2017 Westpac Group Annual Report
WESTPAC GROUP
Annual Report 2017
2017 Westpac Group
Annual Report
Proudly
Supporting
Australia for
200 Years
On the 8th April 2017 Westpac reached a significant
milestone, celebrating its 200th anniversary.
For 200 years we have helped millions of customers across
Australia and New Zealand manage their finances and
realise their dreams. Much has changed since our company
first began but our commitment to helping our customers,
communities and people to prosper and grow remains at
the heart of everything we do.
Westpac Banking Corporation
ABN 33 007 457 141
The Westpac Group Annual Report,
Annual Review & Sustainability Report and
Sustainability Performance Report represent
Westpac’s extended reporting framework
and can be found online at
www.westpac.com.au/investorcentre.
ON THE COVER
Bank of New South Wales Sydney
office, 1853, and Barry McGuire,
Managing Director and co-founder
of Redspear Safety and Westpac
customer. Read Barry's story online
via the website address below.
This page
Barry McGuire and
Francois Witbooi from
Redspear Safety with
their local Westpac
business banker
Matt Turnbull.
2017 Westpac Group
Sustainability Performance
Report
Proudly
Supporting
Australia for
200 Years
2017 Westpac Group
Annual Review &
Sustainability Report
Proudly
Supporting
Australia for
200 Years
2017 Annual Review
& Sustainability
Report
2017 Sustainability
Performance
Report
WESTPAC GROUP
Annual Report 2017
2017 Westpac Group
Annual Report
Proudly
Supporting
Australia for
200 Years
2017 Annual
Report
Table of contents
2017 Westpac Group Annual Report 1
In this Annual Report a reference to ‘Westpac’, ‘Group’,
‘Westpac Group’, ‘we’, ‘us’ and ‘our’ is to Westpac Banking
Corporation ABN 33 007 457 141 and its subsidiaries unless it
clearly means just Westpac Banking Corporation.
For certain information about the basis of preparing the financial
information in this Annual Report see ‘Reading this report’ in
Section 2. In addition, this Annual Report contains statements that
constitute ‘forward-looking statements’ within the meaning of
Section 21E of the US Securities Exchange Act of 1934. For an
explanation of forward-looking statements and the risks,
uncertainties and assumptions to which they are subject, see
‘Reading this report’ in Section 2.
Information contained in or accessible through the websites
mentioned in this Annual Report does not form part of this report
unless we specifically state that it is incorporated by reference and
forms part of this report. All references in this report to websites are
inactive textual references and are for information only.
Annual Report
Performance highlights 2
Section 1 3
Chairman’s report 4
Chief Executive Officer’s report 7
Information on Westpac 13
Business strategy 13
Outlook 16
Significant developments 17
Directors’ report 26
Remuneration Report 40
Section 2 69
Five year summary 70
Reading this report 71
Review of Group operations 73
Income statement review 75
Balance sheet review 80
Capital resources 84
Divisional performance 86
Consumer Bank 89
Business Bank 90
BT Financial Group (Australia) 91
Westpac Institutional Bank 93
Westpac New Zealand 94
Group Businesses 96
Risk and risk management 97
Risk factors 97
Risk management 105
Credit risk 106
Liquidity risk 106
Market risk 107
Operational risk and compliance risk 108
Other risks 109
Westpac’s approach to sustainability 112
Sustainability performance 112
Five year non-financial summary 117
Other Westpac business information 119
Section 3 121
Financial statements 122
Notes to the financial statements 128
Statutory statements 241
Section 4 253
Shareholding information 254
Additional information 266
Information for shareholders 270
Glossary of abbreviations and defined terms 274
Contact us inside back cover
1
2
3
4
Performance highlights
2 2017 Westpac Group Annual Report
0BNet profit after tax $7,990 million, up 7%
1BDividends $1.88, unchanged
2BCash earnings $8,062 million, up 3%
3BReturns 13.8%, down 22bps
4BCash earnings per ordinary share, up 2%
% change
2017 2016 2017 / 2016
Reported earnings
Net profit after tax
1
($m)
7,990 7,445 7%
Earnings per share
(cents)
238.0 224.6 6%
Dividends per share (cents)
188 188 –
Return on equity
5
(%)
13.6 13.3 33bps
Expense to income ratio
(%)
43.3 43.9 (65bps)
Common Equity Tier 1 capital ratio (%)
10.6 9.5 108bps
Cash earnings basis
2
Cash earnings
($m)
8,062 7,822 3%
Cash earnings per share (cents)
239.7 235.5 2%
Cash earnings return on equity
5
(%)
13.8 14.0 (22bps)
Economic profit
7
($m)
3,774 3,774 –
Net profit attributable to ordinary equity holders.
1
The adjustments to our reported results to derive cash earnings are
2
described in Note 2 of our 2017 financial statements.
Figures for 2009 (and for cash earnings in 2008 only) are presented
3
on a ‘pro forma’ basis; that is, as if the merger between Westpac and
St.George Bank Limited was completed on 1 October 2007. The
basis of presentation of the pro forma results is explained in more
detail in Section 2.1 of Westpac’s Full Year 2009 Results
(incorporating the requirements of Appendix 4E) lodged with the ASX
on 4 November 2009 and that section of the ASX Announcement is
incorporated by reference into this Annual Report.
Cash earnings for 2009 has been restated to exclude the impact of
4
fair value adjustments related to the St.George merger. For further
information refer to Note 32 to the financial statements in Westpac’s
2010 Annual Report.
Return on average ordinary equity.
5
Periods prior to 2015 have not been restated for the bonus element
6
of the 2015 share entitlement offer.
Economic profit represents the excess of adjusted cash earnings
7
over a minimum required rate of return on equity invested. For this
purpose, adjusted cash earnings is defined as cash earnings plus the
estimated value of franking credits paid to shareholders. The
calculation of economic profit is described in more detail in Section 5
of Westpac’s Full Year 2017 Results (incorporating the requirements
of Appendix 4E) lodged with the ASX on 6 November 2017 (the
‘ASX Announcement’).
3,859
3,446
6,346
6,991
5,936
6,751
7,561
8,012
7,445
7,990
08091011121314151617
142
116
139
156
166
174
182
187
188188
20
08091011121314151617
5,047
4,675
5,879
6,301
6,564
7,063
7,628
7,820
7,822
8,062
08091011121314151617
22.3
14.0
16.1
16.0
15.4
15.9
16.4
15.8
14.0
13.8
08091011121314151617
198.3
163.7
197.8
209.3
214.8
227.8
245.4
248.2
235.5
239.7
08091011121314151617
Net profit after tax
1
($m)
Dividends per ordinary share (cents) Special dividends
Cash earnings
2,3,4
($m)
Cash earnings per ordinary share
2,3,4,6
(cents)
Cash earnings to average ordinary equity
2,3,4
(%)
Chairman’s report
Chief Executive Officer’s report
Information on Westpac
Directors’ report
(including Remuneration Report)
1
Chairman’s report
4 2017 Westpac Group Annual Report
Lindsay Maxsted
Chairman
It has been an extraordinary year for your company, with
some significant highs and some challenging lows.
Westpac’s 200 year anniversary was the highlight, marking
an important milestone for your company, and for Australia.
Few companies globally have reached this significant
milestone and to do so with perhaps our strongest ever
balance sheet, sound returns, and as the world’s most
sustainable bank, is something shareholders can be very
proud of. The low for the year has been the further
deterioration in the industry’s reputation and the imposition
of a new federal bank levy (Bank Levy) that has impacted
both the value and the returns from your investment in
Westpac. I will speak further on this below.
2017 performance
Our financial performance this year was sound with statutory
net profit up 7%, lifted by good growth across our banking
businesses and a gain on the further sell-down of our
investment in BT Investment Management of $279 million.
Cash earnings (our preferred measure of performance) for
the year ended 30 September 2017 was up 3% compared to
2016.
Growth across lending, deposits and funds under
administration was sound with margins lower, mostly in the
early part of the year. As a result, net interest income was
2% higher although growth was reduced by the Bank Levy,
which became effective from 1 July 2017. The Bank Levy
had a $95 million impact on revenue and reduced cash
earnings by $66 million, or around 1% for Full Year 2017.
Non-interest income was a little lower over Full Year 2017
(less than 1% down) with a strong performance from our
financial markets business early in the year, partially offset
by lower wealth and insurance income and a provision for
customer payments.
The 2% growth in net interest income combined with the
small decline in non-interest income led to a 2% rise in net
operating income.
Expenses also increased 2% over the year. The rise was
mostly associated with investment in the business and rising
regulatory and compliance costs. Ordinary expense growth
(mostly inflationary increases) was largely offset by
$262 million in productivity improvements.
Impairment charges were significantly lower this year, down
$271 million or 24%. The lower charge reflects the high
quality of our loan portfolio and the successful work-out of
some large stressed facilities.
In our assessment of Westpac’s performance for the year,
the Board was pleased with both overall financial outcomes
and progress on the Group’s strategy. Strategically there
have been further developments on the digital
transformation of the organisation, stronger customer
satisfaction results, another significant reduction in
complaints (down 18% in Australia and 21% in New
Zealand) and a lift in employee engagement — all good
indicators of the strength of the Group’s franchise and value.
The Group’s improved financial performance and excellent
strategic progress contributed to a rise in short term
incentives payable to key management personnel this year.
The Board considered that, overall, performance across a
range of measures exceeded documented expectations.
The Board also considered how the executive team
responded to the sector’s reputation issues.
Longer term incentives did not vest this year as the
stretching hurdles set by the Board when the incentives
were first issued in 2014 were not achieved. These long
term incentives would typically comprise around one third of
an executive’s remuneration.
Capital
From a capital perspective, 2017 has been an important
year for the Group. After a 10-year process we have
achieved a level of capital that our regulator, the Australian
Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA), considers to be
‘unquestionably strong’. Our common equity tier 1 capital
now stands at 10.6%, more than a full percentage point
higher than a year earlier. If we convert this on a like-for-like
basis with international peers, it places us comfortably in the
top quartile of banks globally.
There is a similar story on liquidity. Over the past 10 years
our liquid assets have increased more than fourfold to
$138 billion at 30 September 2017.
APRA has consistently sought to be ahead of global
regulatory trends and this saw a Liquidity Coverage Ratio
introduced in January 2015, with a new Net Stable Funding
Ratio coming into effect from 1 January 2018. Today,
Westpac has ratios of 124% and 109% respectively, ahead
of the 100% benchmarks for both.
We are now materially stronger on both capital and liquidity
in absolute terms and relative to global peers. Of course in
banking you can never be complacent on strength, but it
should be of comfort to shareholders that these ratios are
some of the best in the world.
Chairman’s report
2017 Westpac Group Annual Report 5
Building strength however comes at a cost — increasing
shareholders’ equity, lifting shares on issue and holding
additional liquid assets all impact returns. More specifically,
with the increase in shares on issue, our cash earnings per
share of 239.7 cents was up 2% over the year while the
Group’s return on equity (ROE) was 13.8%
1
, marginally
down from 14.0% in 2016. A further consequence of
building strength is that the Group has held dividends
unchanged over recent halves.
Dividends
This year the Board has determined a final dividend of 94
cents per share, which is unchanged over the prior half and
over the final dividend for 2016. This brings the full year
dividend to 188 cents per share, unchanged from 2016.
In setting the dividend the Group seeks to maintain a payout
ratio that is sustainable over the long term. That is, we aim
to retain sufficient capital for growth and to maintain an
unquestionably strong capital position. At the same time, we
seek to maximise the distribution of franking credits. The
impact of the Bank Levy (which cost an equivalent of 2 cents
per share) was also considered.
The final ordinary dividend represents a payout ratio of
79%
2
. The 94 cents represents a dividend yield of 5.9%
based on the closing share price at 29 September 2017 of
$31.92, or a yield of over 8% after adjusting for franking.
The final ordinary dividend will be paid on
22 December 2017 with the record date of
14 November 2017.
Board changes
There were two changes to the Board over the year. As
discussed in last year’s report, after an outstanding 10-year
tenure, Elizabeth Bryan retired at the conclusion of our 2016
Annual General Meeting (AGM).
In September 2017, we were pleased to announce the
appointment of Nerida Caesar to the Board. Nerida was
most recently the CEO of Equifax, formerly Veda, in
Australia and brings with her a wealth of experience in
technology and innovation.
After the end of the financial year we announced that Robert
Elstone will be retiring following the 2017 AGM. Robert has
been an exceptional director in his six years on the Board;
he has a sharp mind, an attention to detail and an ability to
distil issues and focus on what is important. In a period of
heightened global volatility, having a financial markets
specialist such as Robert has also been an asset to your
Board.
Succession planning for new directors is a regular item on
the Board’s agenda and discussions with new potential
candidates are ongoing. As a result, we anticipate the
appointment of one or two new non-executive directors to
the Board in 2018. Potential appointees are expected to add
strength and diversity to your Board.
1
On a cash earnings basis.
2
On a cash earnings basis.
Banking on trust
Last year I spoke about the important role Australia’s banks
play in the economy, and society, and the overwhelming
benefits they have brought. At an economic level, banks
support Australia’s investment requirements and facilitate
the efficient flow of much-needed foreign capital. At a micro
level, banks not only back individual customers and
businesses to help them meet their financial goals, they
facilitate the efficient flow of funds around the economy.
It has been globally acknowledged that Australia and New
Zealand have been well served by their major banks, both
during and since the Global Financial Crisis. You need only
look at other global markets such as the UK, parts of Europe
and the US to appreciate the devastating impact poorly
performing banks can have on customers and economies
over extended periods. Unfortunately the strength of our
banking sector is not always recognised domestically.
In my report last year I sought to address some of the
banking ‘myths’ that have continued to feature in
commentary on the sector. However, unfortunately, the
quality of debate regarding banks has not improved during
the year.
It is clear that some of the criticism of the Australian Banks is
warranted. There have been times over recent years when
issues surrounding the quality of financial advice; the
treatment of insurance claims, and the quality of lending
and/or enforcement decisions have not been consistent with
putting the customer first and/or acting in their best interests.
As a Bank, and an industry, we have also underestimated
the intensity of community, regulatory and government
reaction to the matters where expectations have not been
met.
At the same time the over reaction by many in leadership
positions has been unhelpful and unnecessarily raised the
level of concern in the community relating to trust in the
sector. In part this is why many people respond to the
question that they trust their banker but don’t trust Banks.
Having said that, let me also be perfectly clear that the
Board and management at Westpac understand we must
act. We have to take more responsibility and lift our
standards to an even higher level – and we are. Brian will
talk to developments further but I can say that the Board is
fully behind these initiatives which essentially involve getting
it right for the customer first time and, in those cases where
we fail to do so, calling out the issue and remediating
promptly and appropriately.
The Bank Levy
I wrote to shareholders when the Bank Levy was first
proposed, to make our position clear and seek your
feedback and support. I want to thank the many
shareholders who responded and those who also shared
their views more broadly, including with their local Members
of Parliament.
1
6 2017 Westpac Group Annual Report
The Bank Levy is now in place, but we must continue to
agitate for its removal. It is a highly inefficient and distortive
tax that places an impost on a small number of Australia’s
largest taxpayers. It discriminates against Australian banks
relative to global peers and it has impacted the value of your
investment and the investments of millions of
superannuation holders across Australia.
Australia’s oldest company
It has been a privilege to be Chairman of Westpac in its
200th year. 2017 has been a special time for the company
and its people and it has given us the opportunity to reflect
on what has been behind our success and our legacy for
the future.
We have created the Westpac Bicentennial Foundation,
and the Businesses of Tomorrow program, and we have
increased community sponsorship. Through each of these
initiatives we have created a stronger connection with the
markets in which we operate. And in so doing we have
created a stronger foundation for your company’s future
success.
It was a real highlight for me to share memories with
shareholders, current and past employees and some of
Westpac’s great leaders over the last 30 years.
It was a particular pleasure to connect with, and speak to,
our last five CEOs, and the last four Chairmen. We had
some great discussions and it is very clear what a great love
all these leaders had, and still have, for your company.
While each leader brought unique skills and experience to
Westpac, what stood out for me was how aligned they were
in their view on strategy and their focus on customer service.
And so as the baton passed between these CEOs it was
invariably a seamless transition. I strongly believe that this
consistency of long-term strategy has played a vital role in
your company’s success.
To mark our 200 years we also published a book filled with
stories about the bank, its people and customers. It is a
great read and I encourage you to see the online version on
our website.
Outlook
We remain very positive about the Australian and New
Zealand economies. Both markets have strong
fundamentals with solid GDP growth, low unemployment
and controlled inflation.
These trends are expected to broadly continue in the year
ahead with Westpac Economics expecting Australia’s GDP
growth to be 3% in 2018. We anticipate that growth will be
supported by an ongoing contribution from exports of
resources and services along with higher public spending,
including for infrastructure and private non-residential
construction. We are however expecting growth to slow
through the year as the construction cycle peaks and weak
income growth continues to weigh on consumers.
Looking ahead, these settings combined with a further
tightening of credit standards and regulatory limits on
elements of mortgage growth, will likely lead to slower
growth in lending and deposits in 2018 relative to 2017. Our
financial settings are in good shape but we will be subject to
the full period impact of the Bank Levy in 2018.
Asset quality is expected to remain sound in the year ahead,
and while there are no signs of material concern we will
remain vigilant, consistent with our low risk approach.
Summary
It has been a landmark year for Westpac. The success we
have achieved, the strength in our balance sheet and the
positive momentum across the Group means we are well
positioned for the future.
As we begin our third century, our biggest challenge lies in
rebuilding our reputation across the communities in which
we operate. If we are to continue prospering in the period
ahead, we must actively demonstrate the value we bring to
society and the value we bring to customers every day. We
will continue to improve on service delivery; genuinely
listening to customers and putting them at the centre of
everything we do. That’s why our service strategy is so
important.
One of the key things our 200th anniversary has shown me
is the passion and commitment of the people of Westpac to
supporting our customers and creating a better future for all
Australians and New Zealanders. It is this passion and
commitment that has seen us through the highs and lows of
the past 200 years and continues to drive us forward and
helps us continue to deliver sustainable returns for you, our
shareholders.
LINDSAY MAXSTED
Chairman
Chief Executive Officer’s report
2017 Westpac Group Annual Report 7
Brian Hartzer
Chief Executive Officer
Dear fellow shareholders,
2017 has been a landmark year for the Westpac Group. As
CEO, it has been an immense honour to lead this company
through our 200th year and into our third century of
business.
At events across the country, and in many of our overseas
offices, I have had the pleasure of speaking with thousands
of our customers, community partners, and staff members.
It has given me—and I know many of our people—a
tremendous sense of pride in this company and the role it
has played in the lives of so many Australians and New
Zealanders throughout its history.
There were many special moments during these events. As
a history ‘tragic’, a particular highlight for me was meeting
Bill McRae, a former employee who served as a Lancaster
Bomber Command pilot in the Royal Air Force during the
Second World War. Bill joined the Bank of New South
Wales in 1929, working in Sydney before our legendary
General Manager, Alfred Davidson, sent him to London to
help build our business in the UK (Alfred Davidson helped
restore Australia’s prosperity during the Great Depression by
initiating the devaluation of the Australian pound). Bill
shared anecdotes of his time in the Royal Air Force and at
the bank on both sides of the war—including how he was
chosen to set up the bank’s first training academy, thanks to
his experience training pilots during the War. I will cherish
his stories.
I also enjoyed meeting customers such as the McDonald
family from Cloncurry, who have banked with Westpac (or
the Bank of New South Wales) since the 1860s. One
customer even brought along his ancestor’s Bank of New
South Wales passbook from 1827—still proudly passed
down as a family heirloom.
Another highlight was sharing a stage in April with five of
Westpac’s former leaders: Gail Kelly, David Morgan, Bob
Joss, Frank Conroy, and Bob White (who sadly passed
away in June). As the Chairman writes in his letter, it was
extraordinary to have some of the great minds of Westpac
all in one place. To put it in perspective, since 1992 these
executives have presided over an increase in the value of
your bank from just less than $5 billion to over $108 billion
today — the total shareholder return over that time
averaging 13% per annum.
There aren’t many companies of our size who could get
such an unbroken chain of former leaders together; and
each of them provided interesting insights from their time as
CEO and observations about today’s business. What really
struck me though was the consistency of their message over
time—the focus on customers, the importance of a strong
balance sheet and inclusive culture, and their pride in
Westpac’s broader role in the community. It was also
pleasing to hear each of them endorse our ‘Service
Revolution’ as the natural extension of these principles and
the right strategy for today.
Bringing our vision to life
As I’ve described in previous letters, our ‘Service Revolution’
strategy is designed to bring to life our vision ‘To be one of
the world’s great service companies, helping our
customers, communities, and people to prosper and
grow’. Our strategy has remained consistent over several
years now, and I’m pleased to report that we’ve continued to
build momentum and deliver projects against each of the five
priorities that comprise the strategy: Service leadership,
performance disciplines, digital transformation, targeted
growth, and workforce revolution.
At its heart, this strategy recognises that we’re a service
business, not a product business—which means that our
core purpose is to help customers achieve what’s important
to them. For shareholders, this means that we create value
by building long-term relationships with our customers—
supporting them through thick and thin.
We recognise that our industry, like the economy as a
whole, is currently undergoing a period of substantial
change. That’s why our primary focus as a management
team is on transforming the company—through the ‘Service
Revolution’ program—to make sure we can continue to
compete and grow value successfully over the medium-to-
long term.
In summary then, our long-term strategy to create value is
to:
maintain a strong balance sheet and conservative risk
appetite, focused on serving our home markets of
Australia and New Zealand;
increase the size of our customer base, through the
development of our multiple brands and well-targeted
segment marketing strategies;
1
8 2017 Westpac Group Annual Report
extend the duration and deepen those relationships by
delivering world-class service and using our digital
assets to encourage people to consolidate their
business with us;
reduce costs and fuel innovation by consolidating and
modernising our technology platforms and forming
partnerships with selected fintech companies;
continue to develop a highly-engaged, inclusive culture
and sustainable work practices that help us to attract
and retain the best talent in our market; while
continuing to deliver a disciplined performance, year-in
and year-out, in order to maintain the shareholder
support for the longer-term investments that we are
making.
With this in mind, let me turn now to our 2017 performance.
2017 performance—an overview
At the start of the financial year, with the support of your
Board, the executive team and I agreed three over-arching
goals for our 200th year:
first, to deliver a strong financial result;
second, to deliver substantial improvements in service
quality for our customers; and
third, to make material progress on our culture and
reputation.
Looking back over the year, I’m pleased with the progress
on each of these goals—although we’ve clearly got more
to do.
Financial performance
Our financial performance exceeded the internal earnings
target that we set at the start of the year. Cash earnings
rose 3%, with a 2% increase in operating income, a 2% rise
in expenses, and a substantial reduction in impairment
charges for bad debts. At the same time, we significantly
strengthened our balance sheet, lifting our common equity
tier 1 (CET1) capital ratio above APRA’s benchmark for
banks to be seen as ‘unquestionably strong’. As these
results include the start of the Federal Government’s new
bank levy, increased ‘macro-prudential’ lending
requirements, and a provision to remediate a number of
historical customer issues (I’ll address these shortly), we
consider this to be a good result. (Note too that our cash
earnings exclude the gain on the sale of shares in BT
Investment Management (BTIM) during the period, which
benefits shareholders’ equity. This gain is included in our
reported statutory profit.)
All of our banking divisions performed well, with cash
earnings growth of between 4% and 18%. However,
earnings from BT Financial Group (our wealth management
and insurance business) were 11% down on last year. This
was primarily driven by a number of infrequent items, as well
as significant incremental regulatory and compliance costs.
However, underlying growth in funds under administration,
insurance premiums, and lending within BTFG continued to
be strong.
We sold down our shareholding in BTIM this year from 29%
to 10%, booking a gain of $279 million. It’s worth reflecting
that this has been an outstanding investment for our
shareholders, many of whom also participated in BTIM’s
initial float back in 2007. The decision to sell down reflects
our belief that the future of this business is about ‘open
architecture’ platforms that provide customers and advisors
with a convenient place to manage all of their money,
wherever they choose to invest it. While some of our
competitors are increasingly looking to exit their wealth and
insurance businesses, we continue to believe that having a
strong business in this category will give us an increasing
competitive advantage as Australia’s population ages in the
years ahead.
Within our banking businesses, there were a number of
significant dynamics at play this year that are worth
highlighting.
The first was in Australian mortgages, where APRA
extended its requirements for banks in ways designed to
improve the resilience of the sector to a potential downturn
or substantial increase in interest rates. Specifically, we
were required to maintain investor mortgage growth to less
than 10% per year, and to reduce the proportion of new
mortgage lending with an interest only option to below 30%.
Through a combination of pricing and other actions, both of
these targets were met: Investor mortgage lending grew at
around 6%, and the proportion of interest only lending for the
September 2017 quarter was 26%. However, the
consequence of these and other changes on loan
serviceability assessments was that our overall mortgage
lending grew a little slower than the overall financial system
this year—a result we were comfortable with.
Looking at our balance sheet more broadly, we continued to
prioritise strong growth in deposits while limiting growth in
lending to where returns remain attractive. Total deposits
were up 4% for the year, with high quality household
deposits growing faster than the financial system. Overall
loans grew 3%, with strong growth in small and medium
business as well as the faster-growing service sectors of
health, education, and tourism. However, this was offset by
slower growth in areas such as commercial property, trade
finance and auto finance, where strong competition from
offshore firms has made the returns much less attractive.
We substantially increased the strength of our capital
position this year as well. Our CET1 capital ratio increased
more than a full percentage point to 10.6%, due to
business unit profit growth, our dividend reinvestment plan,
the further sell-down in BTIM, and better capital efficiency.
Although we are still waiting for APRA’s final capital rules, it
is satisfying to know that the strengthening of our balance
sheet required post the GFC is now nearing its end.
Our funding and liquidity position also improved over the
year. We’ve grown deposits, reduced our reliance on
offshore short-term wholesale funding, and further
lengthened the tenor of funding. We also met the new Net
Stable Funding Ratio requirements (essentially a measure of
our longer-term liquidity position) almost a year before the
required 1 January 2018 start date.
Chief Executive Officer’s report
2017 Westpac Group Annual Report 9
The combination of all of these factors meant that net
interest margin was down 4 basis points over the year,
including one quarter’s impact of the Federal Government’s
Bank Levy (which reduced the margin by 1 basis point).
Most of the margin decline happened early in the year, with
the impact of repricing and a greater focus on return leading
to higher margins in the second half of the financial year.
Asset quality remained strong during the year, with the ratio
of stressed assets to total committed exposures (TCE)
declining 15 basis points to 1.05%, and a significant
reduction in credit impairment charges over the year. This
reflects both a reduction in new impaired assets along with
the work-out of a small number of larger impairments during
the year. Mortgage delinquencies have also been sound
with little change over the year—although we are monitoring
Western Australia and regional Queensland closely, as
these regions continue to be impacted by the slowdown in
mining investment. Fortunately, recent indicators suggest
that the worst may now have passed, especially in WA.
Non-interest income was a little lower over the year (down
$36 million). The Group recorded higher markets income
(particularly in the first half of the year), improved business
line fees, and good funds management and insurance
flows—however these gains were offset by regulatory
reductions to credit card interchange fees as well as
provisions for customer payments that totalled $169 million
(most of which was included in non-interest income).
Operating expenses grew 2% over the year, which was at
the lower end of the 2-3% medium term range that we
expect—a good result. In a challenging revenue
environment, our goal continues to be to offset business-as-
usual expense growth with productivity savings. This year
we generated $262 million in productivity savings—equal to
around 3% of our cost base—and removed over 900 roles.
Some of the productivity initiatives we completed this year
included:
launching new mobile banking features to help
customers do their banking on the go;
installing new call centre technology that speeds up
customer ID verification and provides better functionality
to our call centre team members to help serve
customers better;
streamlining organisation structures and ‘spans of
control’; and
consolidating head office locations and transforming
them into more flexible workspaces.
Thanks to initiatives like these, the overall 2% rise in
expenses was largely driven by investments we are making
in our strategic agenda, along with some increases in cost
for regulatory and compliance activities. The cost to income
ratio for FY17 was 42.2%, which puts us among the most
efficient banks in the world, and we remain committed to
taking this ratio below 40% over the next few years.
At a cash earnings level, 3% growth in cash earnings
translated to a 2% increase in earnings per share—mostly
due to the impact of additional shares issued under the
dividend reinvestment plan. What this highlights is that
higher capital levels come at a cost: With increased capital
during the year contributing to a 22 basis point decline in
return on equity (ROE) to 13.8% (although that level remains
within the 13% to 14% band the Group is seeking to
achieve).
Customer performance
The best assessment of whether we are achieving our goal
of becoming one of the world’s great service companies
comes from our customers, and given the size and scope of
our businesses we look at a number of different customer
feedback measures to help us evaluate our performance.
Although any sample-based survey of customer feedback
has its drawbacks, one of the best overall measures is the
Net Promoter Score (NPS), which looks at the relationship
between customers who are advocates for the bank versus
customers who are detractors of the bank. Pleasingly, the
NPS of our consumer banking business has gradually
improved over the year, moving from the bottom of our major
bank peer group 12 months ago to being ranked first in
September 2017.
Another measure we track is the volume of complaints we
receive, and the relationship between those complaints and
the compliments received over the same period. This year
customer complaints across Australian operations fell 18%
compared to FY16, continuing a trend that we’ve seen for
the last several years. Meanwhile compliments received by
our branch network outnumbered complaints by 3.5 to 1,
improving from 3 to 1 last year.
Few things frustrate customers more than not having
services available when they need them. This year,
improvements to our infrastructure have led to a material
reduction in system downtime: In the first half of FY17 we
recorded five ‘severity one’ incidents (system outages with a
significant customer impact) in Australia—and we had no
such outages in the second half of the year. This compares
with 19 such incidents in the previous year.
Improvements in our technology and processes are
reinforced by the Our Service Promise program, a Group-
wide initiative that defines excellent service for our people
and reminds them to incorporate this mindset into action
every day. The program is fundamental to our efforts to
build a genuine service culture, and it’s working. Across the
Westpac Group I regularly see examples of our people
taking the initiative to solve a customer’s problem, to find
creative ideas that help our customers to thrive financially,
and to build genuine long-term relationships.
It’s also important that I and my leadership team support our
people to deliver that high standard of service. So this year
we’ve worked to reduce roadblocks for our people and free
up more time for them to spend with customers: We’ve
digitised time-absorbing tasks, improved the usability of staff
tools, and reduced the number products on offer—making it
easier for our people to recommend the right product and
navigate our processes.
1
10 2017 Westpac Group Annual Report
In our Consumer Bank, we’ve also removed product-based
sales incentives for our front line tellers and personal
bankers, replacing them with service-based metrics. This
means that our people are now more empowered to deliver
better service to customers and indeed are explicitly
rewarded for doing so.
Culture and reputation
As a service business in a highly competitive market, the
quality of our people and culture is a major determinant of
our success. That’s why we’re so focused on making the
Westpac Group attractive to the best bankers in the market,
and creating an environment where those people can do
their best work.
The 200th anniversary gave us the opportunity to remind our
people of the role our company has played—and continues
to play—in helping our customers and Australia/New
Zealand as a whole to thrive. As a result, we’ve seen a
significant increase in staff pride over the year. This—along
with investments we’ve made in our people’s skills,
leadership training, and a variety of community and
sustainability initiatives during the year—has led to a
significant increase in staff morale, as measured by our
employee survey.
On our preferred measure of ‘staff engagement’, we saw a
10 percentage-point increase over the year to 79%. This is
above the global high-performance benchmark for large
companies, and a remarkable increase in a year for a
company with over 39,000 employees.
As well as investing in our people’s skills, we continue to
work hard to make sure the culture is one where everyone
feels welcome and supported. Our Sustainability
Performance Report sets out a number of the initiatives we
undertook this year, but one milestone deserves special
mention: In 2017 Westpac reached its target of having 50%
of its leadership positions held by women. Of course, we
have more to do to ensure diversity is better reflected across
the organisation, but this is a significant achievement.
Improving our reputation
It’s no secret that bank reputations have been under scrutiny
over the past few years, and Westpac has not been immune.
Given the amount of media attention this has received in
recent months, I’d like to make a few observations about the
causes of this situation and what we’re doing about it.
There are a number of causes, starting with missteps by the
banks themselves—including Westpac. These include high-
profile incidents around poor financial advice, denied
insurance claims, poor service, loose or inadequate risk
controls, and allegations of inappropriate staff behaviour.
Although many of these incidents have been specific to
individual institutions, in the current environment each one
affects the reputation of the industry as a whole.
Compounding these issues has been a significant step-up in
community expectations and regulatory intervention. This
has meant that some policies or business practices that
were acceptable in the past no longer pass muster.
At the same time, the volatile political situation in our State
and Federal Parliaments means that issues which would
previously have been dealt with by the appropriate regulator
are now attracting attention from all sides of politics.
The banking sector is working hard to address these
concerns and has nearly completed implementing a six-point
action plan that addresses issues like sales incentives,
complaint handling, support for whistle-blowers, and the
removal of individuals from the industry who breach the law
or codes of conduct. Westpac is fully committed to this effort
and has completed its work on five of the six points (the final
point, a re-write of the Code of Banking Practice, should be
finished next month).
In Westpac’s case, we have participated in a large number
of formal reviews this year by our various regulators and
political bodies, covering topics such as financial planning,
insurance, superannuation, mortgage lending and pricing
practices, credit cards, systems stability, and anti-money
laundering. The Australian Securities and Investments
Commission (ASIC) has also initiated various legal
proceedings against us, alleging we manipulated the bank
bill swap rate (BBSW), provided inappropriate financial
advice through our ‘scaled advice’ phone channel, and
breached our responsible lending obligations. Our principle
is to accept responsibility when we have done the wrong
thing, but in each of these cases we disagree with ASIC’s
position and are defending our actions.
Regardless of the merits, the reality is that the industry has a
significant challenge ahead to rebuild its reputation. In
particular, we need to address the perception that we put our
own needs ahead of those of our customers.
Getting it right and—when we don’t—putting it right
Across the bank we are proactively reviewing our products
and services and the way we have engaged with our
customers. I call this program ‘Get it Right/Put it Right’. The
idea is to make sure that we align all of our products and
services with our customers’ interests, while making them
simpler, fairer, and more transparent. And, where we
uncover an issue that we need to put right, we ensure that
no customer has been disadvantaged from these past
practices. This work has already led to a number of
important changes and actions.
We’ve introduced our new Westpac Lite credit card, with an
interest rate of 9.9% p.a.—the first card of its kind in the
Australian market. We’ve also reduced everyday transaction
fees on our ‘legacy’ personal transaction accounts, and
removed ATM withdrawal fees when non-customers use one
of our ATMs.
Our reviews of our superannuation disclosure resulted in
payments to some of our customers with pre-existing
conditions who did not have the benefit of our improved
disclosure practices. Similarly, we identified that for some
product packages sold in the past customers did not receive
all the benefits to which they were entitled—and we’re now
going back and rectifying the error for each affected
customer. We’ve also automated these benefits so this can’t
happen again.
Chief Executive Officer’s report
2017 Westpac Group Annual Report 11
Based on what we know now, we believe we have dealt with
the most significant of these issues in our 2017 result.
However, these reviews will continue for some time and it is
possible that more issues will emerge that we need to
address. In any event I am confident that this is the right
approach to put our business on a more sustainable footing.
In November last year we appointed Adrian Ahern, a highly
respected former senior lawyer, as our first ‘Customer
Advocate’. Mr. Ahern reports through to me separate from
our businesses, and is thus an independent avenue for
customers to seek a fair and balanced outcome for their
complaints. Our new Customer Council and the new
Stakeholder Advisory Panel are both designed to help us
better understand customer and community views and
identify areas where we could do better. We have also
taken steps to encourage our people to speak up when they
see something that isn’t right, including a new anonymous
phone line and additional protections for whistle-blowers. As
a result we have seen a significant (up 10%) increase in
employees confirming they feel it is ‘safe to speak up’
1
.
The current level of public and political scrutiny is likely to
continue for some time. Hopefully you can see from the
initiatives above that we are committed to taking actions that
will address the substantive issues over time.
Creating a sustainable future
One of the highlights of 2017 was retaining our position as
the most sustainable bank globally in the Dow Jones
Sustainability Index (DJSI). This was the fourth year in a
row and 10th time overall that Westpac has achieved the
global banking sector’s leadership position. The DJSI
assesses companies on a range of criteria including
corporate governance, codes of conduct, HR practices,
community involvement, and environmental policies.
A commitment to sustainable business practices is a big part
of the culture at Westpac: In fact many of our staff have told
me that they were attracted to work at Westpac in large part
because of these policies.
This year we released an updated Climate Change Action
Plan, which attracted significant media and community
attention. In our plan we outlined the steps we will take to
meet our commitment to helping limit global warming to less
than two degrees. This includes our approach to lending to
energy-intensive and renewable sectors, reducing our own
carbon footprint, and helping Australian households to
become more climate-resilient, improve their energy
efficiency and reduce their environmental impact.
The feedback we received on our new climate policy was
overwhelmingly positive. However I know that there are
some shareholders who do not agree with our policy, and
who believe that our actions have overstepped the mark.
Some of you told us that banks should stay out of the
climate debate and just focus on their lending activities. We
respectfully disagree, for two reasons. First, it’s important
that we assess all the risks associated with any lending
proposal, and environmental risks—along with potentially-
related government actions—are increasingly a risk in many
1
2017 Employee Engagement Survey.
transactions. Second, we believe it is in the best long-term
interest of the economy—and therefore our shareholders—
to support a balanced but deliberate transition towards a two
degree economy.
Preparing for a digital future
The final topic I would like to address is how we’re preparing
Westpac for the rapidly-arriving digital future. As many of
you would recall, 2017 saw the 10-year anniversary of
Apple’s iPhone—and it’s astonishing to reflect on how many
aspects of our economy and our daily life have changed in
10 short years.
The impact of digital technology on banking around the
world has been profound, and the changes aren’t close to
done yet. In early October, I visited our branch in Shanghai,
where the vast majority of customers now use an app on
their mobile phone as their main payment device. And two
of the biggest payment applications—WeChatPay and
AliPay—are operated by companies that aren’t even banks.
The threats—and opportunities—created by mobile banking
are profound.
Meanwhile advances in software development, data storage,
and broadband internet mean that so-called ‘cloud
computing’ is an increasingly viable tool for large companies
to improve efficiency and reduce technology costs.
At Westpac one of the main reasons we have survived 200
years is that we’ve always been willing to adapt—to changes
in the economy, in society, and in technology. So we’re
staring straight into these changes and adapting both our
customer service and our underlying technology to make
sure we stay nimble and competitive—and support our
customers to do the same.
This year we also rolled out numerous technology
innovations to customers, including our new wealth platform
(BT Panorama), a new corporate lending portal for
customers of Westpac Institutional Bank, e-conveyancing for
mortgages, cheque digitisation, Lantern Pay (a new payment
platform that supports the Government’s National Disability
Insurance Scheme), and numerous feature and useability
enhancements for mobile banking across all brands.
Our Panorama wealth platform has been a highlight.
Panorama allows investor customers and their advisors to
manage and protect an individual’s wealth and insurance in
a simple-to-use, mobile-accessible platform that integrates
fully into the Group’s online banking systems. The number
of advisers using the platform has continued to grow, with
around $4 billion of funds added to the platform—nearly
100% growth over the year. Other major projects delivered
this year included a new call centre platform, a new ‘big
data’ platform, and the first phase of our new ‘customer
service hub’—which will ultimately help us to consolidate the
St. George and Westpac back-end systems.
We also recognise that much of the innovation and
advances in technology will emerge from small fintech
companies, and so are working hard to build our links with
potential leaders in this arena. To date our Reinventure
venture capital fund has made early-stage investments in
1
12 2017 Westpac Group Annual Report
around 15 fintech startups, giving us an early insight into
emerging innovations in data analysis, payments, and digital
lending. We have also made direct investments in
companies such as zipMoney and Uno Home Loans, which
have the potential to serve as important partners in areas
that are a related but a bit outside of our core businesses.
We must acknowledge that investments in early-stage
companies such as these are inherently risky. However we
have been very pleased so far with the progress these
companies are making. We also find that our involvement
gives us valuable exposure to trends in technology and
some of the emerging business models with which we will
need to compete.
Summary
As you can see, 2017 has been a huge year for the banking
industry, and for the Group. Despite the challenges we
faced, I’m proud of our team and what we have delivered for
you and the future value of your investment in Westpac
shares.
I’ll finish by assuring you that we enter our third century in
great shape, with a clear strategy, growing momentum, and
renewed confidence that we are well on the way to building
one of the world’s great service companies.
All the best,
BRIAN HARTZER
Chief Executive Officer
Westpac Group
Information on Westpac
2017 Westpac Group Annual Report 13
Westpac is one of the four major banking organisations in
Australia and one of the largest banking organisations in
New Zealand. We provide a broad range of banking and
financial services in these markets, including consumer
1
,
business and institutional banking and wealth
management services.
We have branches, affiliates and controlled entities
2
throughout Australia, New Zealand, Asia and in the Pacific
region, and maintain branches and offices in some of the
key financial centres around the world.
3
We were founded in 1817 and were the first bank
established in Australia. In 1850, we were incorporated as
the Bank of New South Wales by an Act of the
New South Wales Parliament. In 1982, we changed our
name to Westpac Banking Corporation following our merger
with the Commercial Bank of Australia. On 23 August 2002,
we were registered as a public company limited by shares
under the Australian Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)
(Corporations Act).
At 30 September 2017, our market capitalisation was
$108 billion
4
and we had total assets of $852 billion.
Business strategy
Westpac’s vision is ‘To be one of the world’s great service
companies, helping our customers, communities and people
to prosper and grow’.
Our strategy seeks to deliver on this vision by building deep
and enduring customer relationships, being a leader in the
community, being a place where the best people want to
work and, in so doing, delivering superior returns for
shareholders.
In delivering on our strategy, we are focused on our core
markets, including Australia and New Zealand, where we
provide a comprehensive range of financial products and
services that assist us in meeting the financial services
needs of customers. With our strong position in these
markets, and over 13 million customers
5
, our focus is on
organic growth, growing customer numbers in our chosen
segments and building stronger and deeper customer
relationships.
A key element of this approach is our portfolio of financial
services brands, which we believe enables us to appeal to a
broader range of customers and provides us with the
strategic flexibility to offer solutions that better meet
individual customer needs.
1
A consumer is defined as a person who uses our products and
services. It does not include business entities.
2
Refer to Note 35 to the financial statements for a list of our material
controlled entities as at 30 September 2017.
3
Contact details for our head office, major businesses and offshore
locations can be found on the inside back cover.
4
Based on the closing share price of our ordinary shares on the ASX
as at 30 September 2017.
5
All customers with an active relationship (excludes channel only and
potential relationships) as at 30 September 2017.
As we continue to build the business, the financial services
environment remains challenging and has required us to
maintain focus on strengthening our financial position while
at the same time improving efficiency. This strengthening
has involved:
lifting the level and quality of our capital;
improving our funding and liquidity position; and
seeking to maintain a high level of asset quality and
provisioning.
While we are currently one of the most efficient banks
globally, as measured by a cost to income ratio, we continue
to focus on ways to simplify our business to make it easier
for customers to do business with us and to make work more
enjoyable for our people. We believe these improvement
efforts also contribute to reducing unit costs that create
capacity for further investment for growth.
Throughout 2017 we continued our focus on delivering
superior outcomes for our customers and shareholders
through our Service Revolution transformation. The Service
Revolution is seeking to: provide a truly personal service for
customers while better anticipating their needs; put
customers in control of their finances; respond to the
increased pace of innovation, disruption and changing
customer behaviours through digitisation and increasing our
capacity for innovation; and innovate and simplify to reinvent
the customer experience.
As part of our delivery of the Service Revolution, we have
developed an integrated, multi-year plan that will be
executed across the Group. In 2017, we delivered significant
outcomes and met key milestones on a number of our
transformation programs focused on the digitisation of the
company through the design and development of a single
bank technology infrastructure. We expect this will
significantly transform customer experiences and drive
operational efficiency. At the same time, our Consumer Bank
and Business Bank transformation programs continued to
deliver market-leading customer services, while lowering the
cost to serve.
Over the year, substantial work has also been undertaken
on conduct and culture, with work focused on continuing to
strengthen our conduct management across the Group. In
addition, work continues on ensuring that we are responding
to our changing regulatory and industry landscape, with
initiatives around a product remediation program,
implementing Australian Bankers’ Association (ABA)
industry initiatives (further information is contained in
‘Significant developments’) and enhancing our remuneration
frameworks.
Sustainability is part of our strategy of seeking to anticipate
and shape the most pressing emerging social issues where
we have the skills and experience to make a meaningful
difference and drive business value. Our approach makes
sustainability part of the way we do business, embedded in
our strategy, values, culture and processes.
1
14 2017 Westpac Group Annual Report
Supporting our customer-focused strategy is a strong set of
company-wide values, which are embedded in our culture.
These are:
integrity;
service;
one team;
courage; and
achievement.
Strategic priorities
In delivering our strategy, we have five strategic priorities
that help guide our activities:
Service leadership
a)
provide a seamless customer experience across
all channels;
deepen relationships through context-based customer
experiences using our portfolio of brands; and
acquire new customers by making it simpler, easier and
better for customers to choose us.
Digital transformation
b)
create a 21st century, digitised bank with multi-
brand capabilities;
simplify products and processes by digitising end-to-
end; and
drive efficiency opportunities from digitisation and
consolidation of systems.
Performance discipline
c)
to be the region’s best performing bank;
manage the business in a balanced way across
strength, growth, return and productivity;
maintain strong levels of capital, to meet the needs of all
our stakeholders and requirements of regulators;
continue to enhance our funding and liquidity position,
including ensuring a diversity of funding pools and
meeting new liquidity requirements; and
maintain a high quality portfolio of assets, coupled with
appropriate provisioning.
Growth highways
d)
focus on stronger growth in:
– small to medium enterprises;
– wealth; and
be targeted in specific business segments.
Workforce revolution
e)
focus on a customer-centric culture;
strengthen the skills of our people to better serve
customers and meet their complete financial needs;
empower our people to drive innovation, deliver new
and improved ways of working and be responsive
to change; and
continue to enhance the diversity of our workforce.
Organisational structure
Our operations comprise the following key customer-facing
business divisions operating under multiple brands.
Consumer Bank (CB) is responsible for sales and service to
consumer customers in Australia under the Westpac,
St.George, BankSA, Bank of Melbourne and RAMS brands.
Activities are conducted through a dedicated team of
specialist consumer relationship managers along with our
call centres and our extensive network of branches and
ATMs. Customers are also supported by a range of internet
and mobile banking solutions. CB also works in an
integrated way with BTFG and WIB in the sales and service
of select financial services and products, including in wealth
and foreign exchange. The revenue from these products is
mostly retained by the product originator.
Business Bank (BB) is responsible for sales and service to
micro, small to medium enterprises (SME) and commercial
business customers in Australia for facilities up to
approximately $150 million. The division operates under the
Westpac, St.George, BankSA and Bank of Melbourne
brands. Customers are provided with a wide range of
banking and financial products and services to support their
borrowing, payments and transaction needs. In addition,
specialist services are provided for cash flow finance, trade
finance, automotive and equipment finance, property finance
and treasury. The division is also responsible for consumer
customers with auto finance loans. BB works in an
integrated way with BTFG and WIB in the sales and service
of select financial services and products including corporate
superannuation, foreign exchange and interest rate hedging.
The revenue from these products is mostly retained by the
product originator.
BT Financial Group (Australia) (BTFG) is the Australian
wealth management and insurance arm of the Westpac
Group, providing a broad range of associated services.
BTFG’s funds management operations include the
manufacturing and distribution of investment,
superannuation, retirement products, wealth administration
platforms, private banking, margin lending and equities
broking. BTFG’s insurance business covers the
manufacturing and distribution of life, general and lenders
mortgage insurance. The division also uses third parties to
manufacture certain general insurance products. In
managing risk across all insurance classes, the division
reinsures certain risks using external providers. BTFG
operates a range of wealth, funds management and financial
advice brands (including Ascalon which is a boutique
incubator of emerging fund managers) and operates under
the banking brands of Westpac, St.George, Bank of
Melbourne and BankSA for Private Wealth and Insurance.
Westpac Institutional Bank (WIB) delivers a broad range of
financial products and services to commercial, corporate,
institutional and government customers with connections to
Australia and New Zealand. WIB operates through dedicated
industry relationship and specialist product teams, with
expert knowledge in transactional banking, financial and
debt capital markets, specialised capital and alternative
investment solutions. Customers are supported throughout
Australia as well as via branches and subsidiaries located in
New Zealand, the US, UK and Asia. WIB is also responsible
Information on Westpac
2017 Westpac Group Annual Report 15
for Westpac Pacific, currently providing a range of banking
services in Fiji and PNG. WIB works in an integrated way
with all the Group’s divisions in the provision of more
complex financial needs, including across foreign exchange
and fixed interest solutions.
Westpac New Zealand is responsible for sales and service
of banking, wealth and insurance products for consumers,
business and institutional customers in New Zealand.
Westpac conducts its New Zealand banking business
through two banks in New Zealand:
Westpac New Zealand Limited (WNZL), which is
incorporated in New Zealand; and
Westpac Banking Corporation (New Zealand Branch),
which is incorporated in Australia.
Westpac New Zealand operates via an extensive network of
branches and ATMs across both the North and South
Islands. Business and institutional customers are also
served through relationship and specialist product teams.
Banking products are provided under the Westpac brand,
while insurance and wealth products are provided under
Westpac Life and BT brands, respectively. Westpac
New Zealand also maintains its own infrastructure, including
technology, operations and treasury.
Group Businesses include:
Treasury, which is responsible for the management of
the Group’s balance sheet including wholesale funding,
capital and management of liquidity. Treasury also
manages the interest rate risk and foreign exchange
risks inherent in the balance sheet, including managing
the mismatch between Group assets and liabilities.
Treasury’s earnings are primarily sourced from
managing the Group’s balance sheet and interest rate
risk (excluding Westpac New Zealand) within set risk
limits;
Group Technology, which comprises functions for the
Australian businesses, is responsible for technology
strategy and architecture, infrastructure and operations,
applications development and business integration; and
Core Support, which comprises functions performed
centrally, including Australian banking operations,
property services, strategy, finance, risk, compliance,
legal and human resources.
Group Technology costs are fully allocated to other divisions
in the Group. Core Support costs are partially allocated to
other divisions in the Group, with costs attributed to
enterprise activity retained in Group Businesses.
Group Businesses also includes items, including earnings on
capital not allocated to divisions, accounting entries for
certain intra-group transactions that facilitate the
presentation of the performance of the Group’s operating
segments, earnings from non-core asset sales and certain
other head office items such as centrally raised provisions.
Competition
The Group operates in a highly competitive environment
across the regions in which we do business.
We serve the banking, wealth and risk management needs
of customer segments from consumers to small businesses
through to large corporate and institutional clients. The
Group competes with other financial services industry
players for customers, by covering their transacting, saving,
investing, protecting and borrowing needs with a wide set of
products and services. Our competitors range from large
global organisations with broad offerings to entities more
focused on specific regions, products or services. Our
competitors include financial services and advisory
companies such as banks, investment banks, credit unions,
building societies, mortgage originators, credit card issuers,
brokerage firms, fund and asset management companies,
insurance companies, online financial services providers and
increasingly, technology companies are also developing
competitive offerings.
Like other financial services providers, our competitive
position across customer segments, products and
geographies is determined by a variety of factors. These
include:
the quality, range, innovation and pricing of products
and services offered;
digital and technology solutions;
customer service quality and convenience;
the effectiveness of, and access to, distribution
channels;
brand reputation and preference;
the types of customer served; and
the talent and experience of our employees.
We also operate in an environment where digital innovation
is changing the competitive landscape. In the context of
innovation, we are dependent on our ability to offer new
products and services that match evolving customer
preference and compare favourably to those of our
competitors. The competitive nature of the industry means
that if we are not successful in developing or introducing
new products and services, or in responding or adapting to
changes in customer preferences and habits, we will lose
customers to our competitors.
Competition within Australia’s financial system is evidenced
by both the significant number of providers and the range of
products and services available to customers. In Australia,
we have seen competition for deposits partly driven by
clearer global regulatory requirements for liquidity
management in the post-Global Financial Crisis
environment, such as the introduction of the Liquidity
Coverage Ratio (LCR) in 2015 and the upcoming Net Stable
Funding Ratio (NSFR). Banks and other financial institutions
also seek to achieve a higher proportion of high quality
deposit funding as credit rating agencies and debt investors
look for strong balance sheet positions in their assessment
of quality institutions.
Competition for lending is also expected to remain high. At
the same time, businesses and consumers are cautious
about the global outlook and continue to reduce gearing.
The residential mortgage business continues to be highly
competitive, with increased regulatory oversight to make the
balance sheets of both borrowers and lenders more resilient.
In particular, the most recent regulatory focus has been on
limiting interest only lending. The high degree of competition
1
16 2017 Westpac Group Annual Report
and regulatory interest is expected to continue. Serving
business customers’ transaction and trade financing needs
has been at the centre of competitive activity as customer
expectations increase.
In our wealth business, we expect the broader competitive
landscape to continue to undergo significant change with
ongoing consolidation in life insurance, continued regulatory
and structural change in financial advice, and increased
overseas interest and participation in superannuation.
In New Zealand, the Group is experiencing strong
competition as banks vie for new customers. Competition for
deposits remains intense and home lending is particularly
competitive on price and switching incentives.
Outlook
1
The Australian economy has continued to grow solidly in
2017. GDP increased by 1.8% for the year to June 2017,
being affected by the severe weather along Australia’s
eastern seaboard in the March quarter 2017. As this impact
fades, GDP growth is forecast to increase to around 3% by
the end of calendar 2017.
Recent growth has been supported by continued
employment growth, more confidence around the global
economy, higher commodity prices, a boost in public
spending and a reduced drag from the slowdown in mining
investment. We have also been encouraged by some
improvement in the level of non-mining business investment,
particularly in the construction sector.
Despite this encouraging news, the Reserve Bank has
chosen to keep interest rates on hold. Concerns around the
consumer are a key issue. Income growth has been modest;
household leverage has increased and household budgets
are being impacted by rising energy costs.
The current mix of growth has continued to vary across
Australia. NSW and Victoria are performing particularly well,
benefiting from low interest rates and stronger housing
construction. Conditions have been much more challenging
in areas impacted by the slowdown in mining (WA and
regional Queensland). In both these regions we have seen
rising unemployment, falling house prices, restrained
spending and higher loan delinquencies. More recently,
there are signs of an improvement, particularly in light of
higher commodity prices, although realistically, a full
recovery is likely to take some time.
In New Zealand, the economy has also been sound, with a
solid pipeline of construction projects, strong population
growth and low interest rates all supporting growth. Some
construction delays and capacity constraints have, however,
limited this growth. GDP growth has held at around 3%, with
unemployment of around 5% and inflation near 2%.
The international outlook has improved over the year. The
consensus view at the recent IMF meeting in Washington
was that 2017 has been the best year for synchronised
global growth since the Global Financial Crisis.
Within Australia, the 2018 outlook is for real GDP to grow at
around 2.5%, with growth expected to slow through the year.
That profile reflects the Group’s expectation that ongoing
1
All data and opinions under ‘Outlook’ are generated by our internal
economists and management.
weak income growth will further weigh on the consumer
through 2018. Prospects for a reasonable lift in business
investment are still clouded while housing construction, after
being a contributor to growth, is likely to peak with its impact
slowing in the year ahead. On the other hand, there will be
ongoing contributions from exports, both resources and
services, public demand, including infrastructure and from
private non-residential construction. Consistent with that
growth profile, we expect the recent strength in employment
growth to slow next year, with a small rise in the
unemployment rate likely.
Inflation is also anticipated to remain at the lower end of the
RBA’s target band and this, along with a modest slowdown
in growth, is expected to see the RBA’s cash rate hold at
1.5% through 2018.
Financial system credit grew by just below 6% in the year to
September 2017, with system housing credit rising 6.5%,
and system business credit expanding by 4.5%. Other
consumer credit declined over the year by just over 1% –
this continues a path of no growth in other consumer credit
for a number of years.
Given the economic backdrop, and the further tightening of
credit standards as the full consequences of macro-
prudential measures flow through, growth in financial system
credit in the year to September 2018 is expected to slow to
around 4.5%. In particular, housing credit growth is forecast
to ease to closer to 5.0%, while business credit is expected
to slow to nearer 4.0%.
Westpac Group remains focused on executing our strategy
of creating a great service company, with our five strategic
priorities assisting to guide this transformation. These
include:
maintaining our performance disciplines – continuing to
be prudent in the management of capital, funding and
liquidity; managing returns effectively seeking to
achieve a cash ROE between 13% and 14% and
remaining disciplined on asset growth;
through service leadership, continue to build our
customer base while also increasing the depth of
customer relationships;
digital transformation is utilising technology to materially
improve efficiency and reduce the Group’s cost to
income ratio to below 40% in the medium term;
wealth, small and medium business enterprises will
continue to be our areas of targeted growth. These
include further building on the Group’s wealth
management system, called Panorama, and using new
technologies to make business banking more
accessible to customers; and
through our workforce revolution priority we are seeking
to further build a stronger and more diverse workforce
where the best people want to work.
The financial services industry continues to experience
significant regulatory change and pressure. The Bank Levy
will be fully applied through the year. Following
announcements from our regulator, APRA, we have greater
clarity on what sort of capital levels we require to be
considered ‘unquestionably strong’. APRA have indicated
Information on Westpac
2017 Westpac Group Annual Report 17
they expect to finalise their updated capital rules by the end
of calendar 2017, which will draw upon the capital
frameworks being developed by the Basel Committee on
Banking Supervision. Banks are expected to be required to
meet these new standards by 1 January 2020. We believe
the Group is already well placed to meet the Net Stable
Funding Ratio (NSFR) which applies from 1 January 2018.
Given the strength of our business, and our balance sheet,
in both absolute terms and relative to peers, we believe
Westpac is well placed to respond to any additional
regulatory requirements.
Looking ahead, with our strong positioning, disciplined
growth and solid operating performance across all divisions,
combined with good progress on our strategic priorities,
Westpac believes it is well positioned to continue delivering
sustainable outcomes for shareholders and customers.
Significant developments
Corporate significant developments
Bank Levy for Authorised Deposit-taking Institutions (ADIs)
On 23 June 2017, legislation was enacted that introduced a
new levy on ADIs with liabilities of at least $100 billion (Bank
Levy). The Bank Levy became effective from 1 July 2017
and the rate is set at 0.06% per annum of certain ADI
liabilities. There is no end date provided for the Bank Levy.
The Bank Levy applies to liabilities of Westpac (including its
offshore branches), but does not apply to liabilities of
Westpac’s subsidiaries. Furthermore, the Bank Levy is not
charged on Additional Tier 1 capital, deposits protected by
the Financial Claims Scheme and RBA exchange settlement
balances. The legislation also provides for inclusion of
derivative liabilities on a net basis and for the Bank Levy to
be tax deductible.
The Bank Levy cost Westpac $95 million in Full Year 2017,
with an after tax impact of $66 million and is estimated to
cost Westpac approximately $405 million in Full Year 2018,
with an after tax impact of approximately $284 million.
House of Representatives Standing Committee on
Economics’ Review of the Four Major Banks and other
reviews
On 16 September 2016, the Chairman of the House of
Representatives Standing Committee on Economics
announced that the Committee had commenced its Review
of the Four Major Banks (Parliamentary Review). The terms
of reference for the Parliamentary Review are wide-ranging,
with one area of focus being how individual banks and the
industry as a whole are responding to issues identified
through other inquiries, including through the Australian
Bankers’ Association (ABA) action plan. Westpac attended
public hearings of the Parliamentary Review on
6 October 2016, 8 March 2017 and 11 October 2017.
The first report of the Parliamentary Review was published
on 24 November 2016 and contained ten recommendations.
The second report was published on 21 April 2017. In its
second report, the Committee restated its support for the
recommendations in the first report and supported a
recommendation of the Australian Small Business and
Family Enterprise Ombudsman to remove non-monetary
default clauses in small business loan contracts.
In May 2017, the Australian Government announced that it
supported nine of the ten recommendations made by the
Committee in its first report and announced a range of
measures designed to implement these recommendations,
such as:
the introduction of the Banking Executive Accountability
Regime (discussed below);
an independent review to recommend the best
approach to implement an open banking regime with
respect to banking product and consumer data; and
the creation of a new dispute resolution framework,
including the establishment of the Australian Financial
Complaints Authority, which is designed to be a single
external dispute resolution body for the handling of
financial and superannuation disputes.
On 29 November 2016, the Senate referred an inquiry into
the regulatory framework for the protection of consumers,
including small businesses, in the banking, insurance and
financial services sector to the Senate Economics
References Committee. The terms of reference for the
inquiry focus on a range of matters relating to the protection
of consumers against wrongdoing in the sector. They also
require the inquiry to examine the availability and adequacy
of redress and support for consumers who have been
victims of wrongdoing. The inquiry is scheduled to produce a
report in the first half of 2018.
Further, there are a number of other reviews commissioned
by the Australian Government, including an independent
review to recommend the best approach to implement an
open banking regime in Australia. The review will advise on
the design of the model and regulatory framework to require
banks to share product and customer data with customers
and third parties, including the scope of data sets to be
shared, data transfer mechanisms, risks such as customer
trust and privacy safeguard requirements, and costs of
implementation. The review will report to the Government by
the end of 2017.
In addition to the reviews and inquiries mentioned above, the
ACCC is undertaking a specific inquiry, until 30 June 2018,
into the pricing of residential mortgages by those banks
affected by the Bank Levy (including Westpac), which
includes monitoring the extent to which the Bank Levy is
passed on to customers.
As these reviews and inquiries progress, they may lead to
further regulation and reform.
Banking Executive Accountability Regime
In May 2017, the Australian Government announced that it
would introduce the Banking Executive Accountability
Regime (BEAR). The Government’s stated intention is to
introduce a strengthened responsibility and accountability
framework for the most senior and influential directors and
executives in ADI groups (referred to as ‘accountable
persons’ under BEAR). The Treasury Laws Amendment
(Banking Executive Accountability and Related Measures)
Bill 2017 was introduced into Parliament on 19 October
2017. The Bill has been referred to the Senate Economics
Legislation Committee, which is expected to report on the
Bill by 24 November 2017.
1
18 2017 Westpac Group Annual Report
If enacted in the form currently proposed, BEAR will involve
a range of new measures, including:
imposing a set of requirements to be met by ADIs and
accountable persons, including accountability
obligations;
requirements for ADIs to register accountable persons
with APRA prior to their commencement in an
accountable person role, to maintain and provide APRA
with a map of the roles and responsibilities of
accountable persons across the ADI group, and to give
APRA accountability statements for each accountable
person detailing that individual’s roles and
responsibilities; and
new and stronger APRA enforcement powers, including
disqualification powers in relation to accountable
persons who breach the obligations of BEAR and a new
civil penalty regime that will enable APRA to seek civil
penalties in the Federal Court of up to $210 million (for
large ADIs, such as Westpac) where an ADI breaches
its obligations under BEAR and the breach relates to
‘prudential matters’.
The proposed commencement date for implementation of
BEAR is 1 July 2018 (with transitional arrangements for
certain aspects of BEAR).
Productivity Commission Inquiry into Competition in the
Australian Financial System
In May 2017, the Australian Government announced a
Productivity Commission inquiry into competition in the
financial system. This review was a recommendation of the
Financial System Inquiry. The terms of reference are broad
and require the Productivity Commission to review
competition in Australia’s financial system with a view to
improving consumer outcomes, and the productivity and
international competitiveness of the financial system and the
economy more broadly, and supporting ongoing financial
system innovation, while balancing these with financial
stability objectives. The review commenced on 1 July 2017
and the Productivity Commission is due to hand its final
report to the Government by 1 July 2018.
Australian Bankers’ Association Banking Reform Program
and industry initiatives
On 21 April 2016, the ABA announced an action plan to
protect consumer interests, increase transparency and
accountability and build trust and confidence in banks.
The reform program includes a number of industry-led
initiatives including:
a review of product sales commissions and product
based payments;
the establishment of an independent customer advocate
in each bank;
supporting the broadening of external dispute resolution
schemes;
evaluating the establishment of an industry-wide,
mandatory, last resort compensation scheme;
strengthening protections available to whistleblowers;
the implementation of a new information sharing
protocol to help stop individuals with a history of poor
conduct moving around the industry;
strengthening the commitment to customers in the Code
of Banking Practice; and
supporting ASIC as a strong regulator.
On 20 October 2017, the independent governance expert
overseeing the ABA action plan released his sixth report
titled, Australian banking industry: Package of Initiatives,
which noted that banks are continuing to make good
progress in delivering the initiatives, with a number of the
initiatives now implemented or moving into implementation
stage.
Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC)
Enforcement Review Taskforce
On 19 October 2016, the Australian Government released
the terms of reference for the ASIC Enforcement Review
Taskforce (Taskforce), which will assess the suitability of
ASIC’s existing regulatory tools (including the penalties
available) and whether they need to be strengthened.
The Taskforce has completed consultations on a range of
matters, including proposed reforms to the mandatory
breach reporting framework. These reforms include clarifying
when a reporting obligation is triggered, expanding the class
of reports that must be made to include misconduct by
individual advisers and employees and strengthening the
penalties for failing to report, including through the
introduction of an infringement notice regime.
The Taskforce has also consulted on:
strengthening ASIC’s licensing powers, which would
enable ASIC to take action to refuse to grant, or to
suspend or cancel, a licence where the applicant or
licensee is not considered to be a fit and proper person;
and
proposals to expand ASIC’s powers to ban senior
managers working in financial services businesses.
It is currently consulting on proposals to strengthen penalties
for corporate and financial sector misconduct.
The Taskforce is scheduled to report its recommendations to
the Australian Government in 2017.
Product design and distribution obligations and product
intervention power
As part of a package of reforms announced by the Australian
Government in 2016, the Federal Government announced
that it would accelerate the implementation of certain
recommendations made by the Financial System Inquiry
(FSI), including granting ASIC a product intervention power
and introducing a new ‘principles-based’ product design and
distribution obligation on issuers and distributors.
On 13 December 2016, the Australian Government released
a consultation paper seeking feedback on these proposed
reforms. Submissions on the consultation paper closed on
15 March 2017 and it is anticipated that draft legislation will
be released for consultation in 2018.
Information on Westpac
2017 Westpac Group Annual Report 19
Financial benchmarks reform
In October 2016, the Australian Government announced a
package of measures designed to strengthen the regulation
of financial benchmarks. The measures were recommended
to the Australian Government by the Council of Financial
Regulators following a consultation process on financial
benchmark reform.
The key measures to be implemented include:
ASIC will be empowered to develop enforceable rules
for administrators and entities that make submissions to
significant benchmarks (such as Westpac), including the
power to compel submissions to benchmarks in the
case that other calculation mechanisms fail;
administrators of significant benchmarks will be required
to hold a new ‘benchmark administration’ licence issued
by ASIC (unless granted an exemption); and
the manipulation of any financial benchmark or financial
product used to determine a financial benchmark (such
as negotiable certificates of deposit) will be made a
specific criminal and civil offence.
These measures are expected to be implemented over the
next 6-12 months.
Residential mortgage lending – reviews by and engagement
with regulators
APRA has been looking at, and speaking publicly about, the
broader issue of bank serviceability standards pertaining to
residential mortgage lending. Westpac is engaging
proactively with APRA in relation to its work in this area.
In the mortgage area, ASIC continues to focus on interest
only mortgage origination and high risk customer groups.
ASIC has also initiated a review into public statements by
some banks (including Westpac) about interest rate
changes. We are working with ASIC on their reviews in
these areas.
BBSW proceedings
Following ASIC’s investigations into the interbank short-term
money market and its impact on the setting of the bank bill
swap reference rate (BBSW), on 5 April 2016, ASIC
commenced civil proceedings against Westpac in the
Federal Court of Australia, alleging certain misconduct,
including market manipulation and unconscionable conduct.
The conduct that is the subject of the proceedings is alleged
to have occurred between 6 April 2010 and 6 June 2012.
Westpac is defending these proceedings. ASIC is seeking
from the court declarations that Westpac breached various
provisions of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) and the
Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001
(Cth), pecuniary penalties of unspecified amounts and
orders requiring Westpac to implement a comprehensive
compliance program for persons involved in Westpac’s
trading in the relevant market.
In August 2016, a class action was filed in the United States
District Court for the Southern District of New York against
Westpac and a large number of other Australian and
international banks alleging misconduct in relation to BBSW.
These proceedings are at an early stage and the level of
damages sought has not been specified. Westpac is
defending these proceedings.
ASIC’s responsible lending litigation against Westpac
On 1 March 2017, ASIC commenced Federal Court
proceedings against Westpac in relation to home loans
entered into between December 2011 and March 2015,
which were automatically approved by Westpac’s systems.
ASIC has alleged that the way in which Westpac used the
Household Expenditure Measure (HEM) benchmark to
assess the suitability of home loans for customers during
this period was in contravention of the National Consumer
Credit Protection Act 2009 (Cth) (NCCPA). On
26 September 2017, ASIC amended its court documents to
include an additional allegation that the way serviceability
was assessed for interest only loans during the same period
also contravened the NCCPA. ASIC has also raised specific
allegations in respect of seven loan applications. ASIC
alleges that Westpac improperly assessed whether those
loans were unsuitable because of the way Westpac used
HEM, and for five of the loan applications (which are loans
with an interest only period), because of the way Westpac
assessed serviceability. ASIC has not made any criminal
allegations, or allegations against specific individuals.
Westpac is defending the proceedings.
Outbound scaled advice division proceedings
On 22 December 2016, ASIC commenced Federal Court
proceedings against BT Financial Management Limited
(BTFM) and Westpac Securities Administration Limited
(WSAL) in relation to a number of superannuation account
consolidation campaigns conducted between 2013 and
2016. ASIC has alleged that in the course of some of these
campaigns, customers were provided with personal advice
in contravention of a number of Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)
provisions. ASIC has selected 15 specific customers as the
focus of their claim. BTFM and WSAL are defending the
proceedings. The proceedings are scheduled to be heard in
February 2018.
Class action against Westpac Banking Corporation and
Westpac Life Insurance Services Limited
On 12 October 2017, a class action was filed in the Federal
Court of Australia on behalf of customers who, since
October 2011, have obtained insurance issued by Westpac
Life Insurance Services Limited (WLIS) on the
recommendation of financial advisers at Westpac Banking
Corporation, St.George Bank, Bank of Melbourne, BankSA
or BT Advice. The action is in relation to the premiums these
customers have been charged for the WLIS policies. The
plaintiffs have alleged, amongst other things, that in
providing the financial advice Westpac breached the
fiduciary duties it owed to the members of the class, the
conduct was unconscionable and WLIS was knowingly
involved in these breaches. Westpac and WLIS are
defending the proceedings.
Brexit
On 29 March 2017, the Prime Minister of the United
Kingdom (UK) notified the European Council in accordance
with Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union of the UK’s
intention to withdraw from the European Union (EU),
triggering a two year period for the negotiation of the UK’s
withdrawal from the EU.
As Westpac’s business and operations are based
predominantly in Australia and New Zealand, the direct
impact of the UK’s departure from the EU is unlikely to be
1
20 2017 Westpac Group Annual Report
material to Westpac. However, it remains difficult to predict
the impact that Brexit may have on financial markets, the
global economy and the global financial services industry.
Reduction to the corporate tax rate
On 11 May 2017, the Australian Government introduced into
Parliament a bill to reduce the corporate tax rate
progressively from 30% to 25% over the next 10 years for all
corporate entities in a staged approach with reference to
aggregated annual turnover thresholds. If the legislation is
passed in its current form, the benefit will begin to take effect
from 1 July 2023, when the corporate tax rate for Westpac
will reduce to 27.5%. Accordingly, the proposed reduction to
the corporate tax rate will not significantly impact Westpac in
the short term. A reduction to the corporate tax rate will
reduce the value of imputation credits ultimately attached to
franked dividends and distributions to certain security
holders.
Taxation of cross-border financing arrangements
The Australian and New Zealand Governments have each
decided to implement the Organisation for Economic Co-
operation and Development’s (OECD) proposals relating to
the taxation treatment of cross-border financing
arrangements. These proposals may affect the taxation
arrangements for ‘hybrid’ regulatory capital instruments
issued by Westpac. If implemented without grandfathering,
the potential effect of the OECD proposals is to increase the
after-tax cost to Westpac of certain previously issued
Additional Tier 1 capital securities. Neither Government has
released draft legislation.
Comprehensive Credit Reporting (CCR)
On 2 November 2017, the Federal Treasurer announced
that the Australian Government will legislate for a mandatory
comprehensive credit reporting regime to come into effect by
1 July 2018. This would require credit providers to provide a
monthly update to credit reporting agencies of all open
consumer credit accounts, including credit cards, personal
loans, mortgages and auto loans. According to the
announcement, the four major banks will be required to have
50% of their credit data ready for reporting by 1 July 2018,
increasing to 100% a year later.
Westpac is currently moving to implement CCR, as we
recognise that CCR supports our principles for responsible
lending by enhancing transparency of consumers’ existing
liabilities. Westpac is also focused on ensuring the highest
level of security of personal data is maintained within the
data sharing arrangements that will underpin CCR data
supply and use.
Sale of shares in BTIM
On 26 May 2017, Westpac sold 60 million shares in BTIM at
a price of $10.75 per share, pursuant to a fully underwritten
institutional offer. Following completion of the sale,
Westpac’s holding in BTIM decreased to approximately
10%. Westpac has announced that it intends to sell its
remaining 10% shareholding in BTIM in the future, subject to
favourable market conditions. In accordance with escrow
arrangements communicated to BTIM in respect of the
retained shareholding, any sale would not occur prior to the
release of BTIM’s first half 2018 results (expected to be in
May 2018).
Issue of Additional Tier 1 capital securities
On 21 September 2017, Westpac issued US$1.25 billion
Additional Tier 1 capital securities, which qualify as
Additional Tier 1 capital under APRA’s capital adequacy
framework.
Regulatory significant developments
Financial System Inquiry’s (FSI) recommendations on bank
capital
The Australian Government’s response to the FSI has
endorsed APRA’s actions in implementing the FSI’s capital-
related recommendations, and has confirmed APRA’s
responsibility for implementing the remaining
recommendations.
On 19 July 2017, APRA released an information paper titled,
Strengthening banking system resilience – establishing
unquestionably strong capital ratios. In its release, APRA
concluded that the four major Australian banks, including
Westpac, need to have a CET1 ratio of at least 10.5%, as
measured under the existing capital framework to be
considered ‘unquestionably strong’. Banks are expected to
meet this new benchmark by 1 January 2020.
APRA’s implementation of capital standards to produce
‘unquestionably strong capital ratios’ will also incorporate
changes to the prudential framework, including consideration
of the finalisation of international Basel III reforms. The final
Basel III reforms may result in significant changes in the risk
weighted asset framework including the introduction of a
revised capital floor for internal model-based methods,
based on standardised approaches.
Whilst APRA has signalled that its revisions to the capital
framework will not necessitate further capital increases for
the industry above the 10.5% benchmark, the details of the
changes (including at a product level) remain unclear.
APRA has announced that it intends to release a discussion
paper on proposed revisions to the capital framework later in
2017 and, following release of the discussion paper, that it
expects to consult on draft prudential standards giving effect
to the new framework in 2018, leading to the release of final
prudential standards in 2019. The new framework is
anticipated to take effect in early 2021.
In addition to the risk-based capital ratio, APRA may also
implement other key FSI recommendations, including:
the introduction of a leverage ratio that acts as a
backstop to an ADI’s risk-based capital requirements.
Whilst APRA requires the disclosure of the leverage
ratio on a quarterly basis, it is yet to be implemented as
a minimum requirement; and
the implementation of a framework for additional loss-
absorbing capacity, discussed further below.
Resolution planning including additional loss absorbing
capacity and APRA’s crisis management powers
In response to the FSI recommendations, the Australian
Government also agreed to further reforms regarding crisis
management. In August 2017, Treasury issued draft
legislation to strengthen APRA’s crisis management powers.
This was introduced into Parliament in October 2017. The
intention of these reforms is to strengthen APRA’s powers to
facilitate the orderly resolution of an institution so as to
protect the interests of depositors and to protect the stability
Information on Westpac
2017 Westpac Group Annual Report 21
of the financial system. The reforms also enhance APRA’s
ability to take actions in relation to resolution planning,
including measures to ensure regulated entities and their
groups are better prepared for resolution.
Consistent with international developments, APRA may also
establish a framework for additional loss absorbing capacity
for the four major Australian banks, including Westpac. The
intention of this would be to facilitate the orderly resolution of
banks and minimise taxpayer support. APRA is yet to
release any consultation on additional loss-absorbing
capacity.
Macro-prudential regulation
From December 2014, APRA has made use of macro-
prudential measures targeting mortgage lending that
continue to impact lending practices in Australia. The
measures include limiting investment property lending
growth to below 10% and imposing additional levels of
conservatism in serviceability assessments.
On 31 March 2017, APRA added to these measures,
requiring ADIs to restrict mortgage lending with interest only
terms to 30% of new mortgage lending. APRA also indicated
that it expects ADIs to place strict internal limits on the
volume of interest only loans with loan-to-valuation ratios
above 80%.
Westpac has implemented steps to achieve these limits,
including introducing differential pricing for investor property
loans and interest only loans, a restriction on the volume of
interest only loans with an LVR of greater than 80%
(includes limit increases, interest only term extension and
switches), no repayment switch fee for customers switching
to principal and interest from interest only loans and no
longer accepting external refinances (from other financial
institutions) for owner occupied interest only loans. Interest
only residential mortgages constituted 26% of new mortgage
lending for the quarter ended 30 September 2017 (currently
46% of Westpac’s overall Australian residential mortgage
portfolio as at 30 September 2017).
Further details of Westpac’s other regulatory disclosures
required in accordance with prudential standard APS 330
can be accessed at
www.westpac.com.au/aboutwestpac/investor-
centre/financial-information/regulatorydisclosures.
Other regulatory developments
Net Stable Funding Ratio
APRA released a revised prudential standard on liquidity
(APS 210) on 20 December 2016. This prudential standard
includes the Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR) requirement,
a measure designed to encourage longer-term funding of
assets and better match the duration of assets and liabilities.
The revised APS 210, inclusive of the NSFR, will commence
from 1 January 2018. During Full Year 2017, Westpac
continued to take steps in preparation for the introduction of
the NSFR from 1 January 2018. Based on the latest
guidance from APRA, Westpac had an estimated NSFR at
30 September 2017 which is above that required from
1 January 2018.
OECD Common Reporting Standard
The OECD has developed Common Reporting Standard
(CRS) rules for the automatic exchange of customer tax
residency and financial account information amongst
participating CRS countries.
CRS requires the Westpac Group to collect and check the
tax residency of all customers and to report the tax
residency and financial account details of non-resident
customers to the relevant authorities in jurisdictions with
which Australia has entered into an exchange of information
agreement.
Together with other Australian financial institutions, Westpac
began collecting tax residency information from 1 July 2017
and will report these details and associated financial account
information from July 2018.
Westpac has implemented changes to its business
operations to comply with the CRS requirements in countries
which have implemented the rules prior to 1 July 2017.
European Union General Data Protection Regulation
The European Union General Data Protection Regulation
(the GDPR) contains new data protection requirements that
will apply from 25 May 2018. The GDPR is intended to
‘strengthen and unify’ data protection for individuals across
the EU and supersedes the existing EU Data Protection
Directive. Australian businesses of any size may need to
comply if they have an establishment in the EU, if they offer
goods or services in the EU, or if they monitor the behaviour
of individuals in the EU. Westpac is evaluating the impact of
GDPR on its businesses with a view to implementing the
necessary changes before commencement of the GDPR.
OTC derivatives reform
International regulatory reforms relating to over-the-counter
(OTC) derivatives continue to be implemented by financial
regulators across the globe, with the focus moving to
implementing variation margin and initial margin
requirements for non-centrally cleared derivatives.
Variation margin requirements in a number of key
jurisdictions for Westpac (being Australia, the EU, US and
Hong Kong) became applicable during Full Year 2017.
Westpac has completed a substantial amount of work to
comply with all applicable variation margin requirements. In
addition, initial margin requirements commenced on
1 September 2016. These requirements are being
introduced in phases through to 1 September 2020.
Westpac currently expects that it will be required to
commence exchanging initial margin by either September
2018 or September 2019.
New Zealand
Regulatory reforms and significant developments in
New Zealand include:
Reserve Bank of New Zealand (RBNZ) – macro-prudential
policy framework
On 8 June 2017, the RBNZ published a consultation paper
seeking feedback on serviceability restrictions such as debt-
to-income ratio (DTI) limits being added to its macro-
prudential toolkit. The RBNZ stated in the consultation paper
that the RBNZ would not utilise a DTI policy in current
market conditions, but considers DTI limits a useful option in
the future.
1
22 2017 Westpac Group Annual Report
RBNZ – Review of Outsourcing Policy
On 19 September 2017, the RBNZ released the final version
of its revised Outsourcing Policy (and updated conditions of
registration). These took effect on 1 October 2017. Key
changes under the revised policy are:
banks will need to obtain a non-objection letter from the
RBNZ before entering into outsourcing arrangements
with a parent or other related party;
a bank that outsources certain functions to any third
party will need to have certain prescribed contractual
terms with that third party and ensure that the third party
has adequate disaster recovery and business continuity
plan capability in relation to the outsourced function;
a bank that outsources certain functions to its overseas
parent or to another non-controlled related party will
need to have robust back-up arrangements in place;
banks will be required to maintain a compendium of
functions and processes that have been outsourced;
and
banks that are members of foreign-owned banking
groups, such as WNZL, will be required to have a
separation plan which describes how they would
operate previously outsourced services if a statutory
manager is appointed or they are otherwise separated
from their overseas parent.
There will be a five year transitional period in relation to
existing outsourcing arrangements.
The key impact of the revised policy will be in respect of
outsourcing arrangements related to institutional products,
settlements, finance, risk management and regulatory
reporting.
RBNZ Capital Review
In March 2017, the RBNZ outlined its plans for its review of
bank capital requirements. The RBNZ’s aim is to agree a
capital regime that ensures a very high level of confidence in
the solvency of the banking system while avoiding economic
inefficiency. The review will look at the three key
components of the regulatory capital regime:
the definition of eligible capital instruments;
the measurement of risk, in particular the risk weights
attached to credit exposures; and
the minimum capital ratio and buffers.
The RBNZ has said that the outcomes of the review will be
heavily influenced by the international regulatory context, the
risk characteristics of the New Zealand system, and the
RBNZ’s regulatory capital approach. The RBNZ released a
high-level Issues Paper in May 2017 and a consultation
paper considering what type of financial instruments should
qualify as bank capital. The RBNZ expects to conclude its
review in the first quarter of 2018. Based on the high level
information released to date, the expectation is that the
RBNZ will likely propose increasing capital ratios and certain
risk weights, with internal ratings-based (IRB) banks having
fewer models to use (to reduce the difference between
standardised and IRB banks).
Reform of the regulation of financial advice
The New Zealand Government announced plans for
changes to the regime regulating financial advice in
July 2016. In August 2017, the Financial Services
Legislation Amendment Bill was introduced into Parliament.
Under the proposed new regime, financial advice will be
provided by licensed firms who will employ financial advisers
and nominated representatives. A Code of Conduct will
apply to all advice and advisers and representatives will be
subject to the same duties and ethical standards, including a
duty to give priority to the client’s interests. Firms will be
responsible for ensuring their advisers and representatives
comply with these duties. The reforms will also remove
legislative barriers to the provision of robo-advice.
A two stage transition is proposed with all industry
participants being required to be operating under a full
licence by May 2021.
RBNZ – Review under section 95 of the Reserve Bank of
New Zealand Act 1989
On 10 February 2017, the RBNZ issued WNZL with a notice
under section 95 of the Reserve Bank of New Zealand Act
1989, requiring WNZL to obtain an independent review of its
compliance with advanced internal rating-based aspects of
the RBNZ’s ‘Capital Adequacy Framework (Internal Models
Based Approach) (BS2B)’ (BS2B). WNZL has disclosed
non-compliance with BS2B (compliance with which is a
condition of registration for WNZL) in its quarterly disclosure
statements. WNZL expects to receive the RBNZ’s final
decision in 2017. There are a range of possible
consequences for WNZL, including potential increases in
minimum capital requirements.
Supervision and regulation
Australia
Within Australia, we are subject to supervision and
regulation by six principal agencies: the Australian
Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA); the Reserve Bank
of Australia (RBA); the Australian Securities and
Investments Commission (ASIC); the Australian Securities
Exchange (ASX); the Australian Competition and Consumer
Commission (ACCC); and the Australian Transaction
Reports and Analysis Centre (AUSTRAC).
APRA is the prudential regulator of the Australian financial
services industry. It oversees banks, credit unions, building
societies, general insurance, re-insurance, life insurance and
private health insurance companies, friendly societies and
most of the superannuation (pension) industry. APRA’s role
includes establishing and enforcing prudential standards and
practices designed to ensure that, under all reasonable
circumstances, financial promises made by the institutions it
supervises are met within a stable, efficient and competitive
financial system. APRA is expected to have new and
strengthened powers under the proposed new Banking
Executive Accountability Regime. For further information,
refer to ‘Significant developments’ above.
As an ADI, we report prudential information to APRA,
including information in relation to capital adequacy, large
exposures, credit quality and liquidity. Our controlled entities
in Australia that are authorised insurers and trustees of
superannuation funds are also subject to the APRA
regulatory regime. Reporting is supplemented by
consultations, on-site inspections and targeted reviews. Our
Information on Westpac
2017 Westpac Group Annual Report 23
external auditor also has an obligation to report on
compliance with certain statutory and regulatory banking
requirements and on any matters that in their opinion may
have the potential to materially prejudice the interests of
depositors and other stakeholders.
Australia’s risk-based capital adequacy guidelines are based
on the approach agreed upon by the BCBS. National
discretion is then applied to that approach, which results in
Australia’s capital requirements being more stringent. Refer
to ‘Capital resources – Basel Capital Accord’ in Section 2.
The RBA is responsible for monetary policy, maintaining
financial system stability and promoting the safety and
efficiency of the payments system. The RBA is an active
participant in the financial markets, manages Australia’s
foreign reserves, issues Australian currency notes and
serves as banker to the Australian Government.
ASIC is the national regulator of Australian companies and
consumer protection within the financial sector. Its primary
responsibility is to regulate and enforce company, consumer
credit, financial markets and financial products and services
laws that protect consumers, investors and creditors. With
respect to financial services, it promotes fairness and
transparency by providing consumer protection, using
regulatory powers to enforce laws relating to deposit-taking
activities, general insurance, life insurance, superannuation,
retirement savings accounts, securities (such as shares,
debentures and managed investments) and futures
contracts and financial advice. ASIC has responsibility for
supervising trading on Australia’s domestic licensed markets
and of trading participants. There are currently proposals to
strengthen ASIC’s existing powers and to provide ASIC with
a product intervention power. For further information, refer to
‘Significant developments’ above.
The ASX operates Australia’s primary national market for
trading of securities issued by listed companies. Some of our
securities (including our ordinary shares) are listed on the
ASX and we therefore have obligations to comply with the
ASX Listing Rules, which have statutory backing under the
Corporations Act 2001. The ASX has responsibility for the
oversight of listed entities under the ASX Listing Rules and
for monitoring and enforcing compliance with the ASX
Operating Rules by its market, clearing and
settlement participants. ASX is now also the benchmark
administrator of BBSW.
The ACCC is the regulator responsible for the regulation and
prohibition of anti-competitive and unfair market practices
and mergers and acquisitions in Australia. Its broad
objective is to administer the Competition and Consumer Act
2010 (Cth) and related legislation to bring greater
competitiveness, fair trading, consumer protection and
product safety to the Australian economy. The ACCC’s role
in consumer protection complements that of ASIC (for
financial services) and Australian state and territory
consumer affairs agencies that administer the unfair trading
legislation of their jurisdictions.
The Australian Government’s present policy, known as the
‘four pillars policy’, is that there should be no fewer than four
major banks to maintain appropriate levels of competition in
the banking sector. Under the Financial Sector
(Shareholdings) Act 1998 (Cth), the Australian
Government’s Treasurer must approve an entity acquiring a
stake of more than 15% in a particular financial sector
company.
Proposals for foreign acquisitions of a stake in Australian
banks are subject to the Australian Government’s foreign
investment policy and, where required, approval by the
Australian Government under the Australian Foreign
Acquisitions and Takeovers Act 1975 (Cth). For further
details refer to ‘Limitations affecting security holders’ in
Section 4.
AUSTRAC oversees the compliance of Australian reporting
entities (including Westpac) with the requirements under the
Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing
Act 2006 (Cth) and the Financial Transaction Reports
Act 1988 (Cth). These requirements include:
implementing programs for identifying and monitoring
customers, and for managing the risks of money
laundering and terrorism financing;
reporting suspicious matters, threshold transactions and
international funds transfer instructions; and
submitting an annual compliance report.
AUSTRAC provides financial information to Australian
federal law enforcement, national security, human services
and revenue agencies, and certain international
counterparts.
New Zealand
The Reserve Bank of New Zealand (RBNZ) is responsible
for supervising New Zealand registered banks. The
New Zealand prudential supervision regime requires that
registered banks publish quarterly disclosure statements,
which contain information on financial performance and risk
positions as well as attestations by the directors about the
bank’s compliance with its conditions of registration and
certain other matters. The RBNZ is developing proposals to
replace off-quarter disclosure statements with a ‘dashboard’
of key information about each locally incorporated bank to
be published on the RBNZ’s website.
The Financial Markets Authority (FMA) is a financial conduct
regulator whose main objective is to promote and facilitate
the development of fair, efficient and transparent financial
markets. Its functions include promoting the confident and
informed participation of businesses, investors and
consumers in those markets. The Financial Markets Conduct
Act, which was passed in 2013, resulted in the FMA having
extensive new responsibilities in the licensing and
supervision of various market participants as well as new
enforcement powers.
United States
Our New York branch is a US federally licensed branch and
therefore is subject to supervision, examination and
regulation by the US Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency and the Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System (the US Federal Reserve) under the US
International Banking Act of 1978 (IBA) and related
regulations.
A US federal branch must maintain, with a US Federal
Reserve member bank, a capital equivalency deposit as
prescribed by the US Comptroller of the Currency, which is
at least equal to 5% of its total liabilities (including
1
24 2017 Westpac Group Annual Report
acceptances, but excluding accrued expenses, and amounts
due and other liabilities to other branches, agencies and
subsidiaries of the foreign bank).
In addition, a US federal branch is subject to periodic onsite
examination by the US Comptroller of the Currency. Such
examination may address risk management, operations,
asset quality, compliance with the record-keeping and
reporting, and any additional requirements prescribed by the
US Comptroller of the Currency from time to time.
A US federal branch of a foreign bank is, by virtue of the
IBA, subject to the receivership powers exercisable by the
US Comptroller of the Currency.
As of 22 June 2016, we elected to be treated as a financial
holding company in the US pursuant to the Bank Holding
Company Act of 1956 and Federal Reserve Board
Regulation Y. Our election will remain effective so long as
we meet certain capital and management standards
prescribed by the US Federal Reserve.
Westpac and some of its affiliates are engaged in various
activities that are subject to regulation by other US federal
regulatory agencies, including the US Securities and
Exchange Commission and the US Commodity Futures
Trading Commission.
Anti-money laundering regulation and
related requirements
Westpac has a Group-wide program to manage its
obligations under the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-
Terrorism Financing Act 2006 (Cth). We continue to actively
engage with the regulator, AUSTRAC, on our activities.
Our Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism
Financing Policy (AML/CTF Policy) sets out how the
Westpac Group complies with its legislative obligations.
The AML/CTF Policy applies to all business divisions and
employees (permanent, temporary and third party providers)
working in Australia, New Zealand and overseas.
United States
The USA PATRIOT Act of 2001 requires US financial
institutions, including the US branches of foreign banks, to
take certain steps to prevent, detect and report individuals
and entities involved in international money laundering and
the financing of terrorism. The required actions include
verifying the identity of financial institutions and other
customers and counterparties, terminating correspondent
accounts for foreign ‘shell banks’ and obtaining information
about the owners of foreign bank clients and the identity of
the foreign bank’s agent for service of process in the US.
The anti-money laundering compliance requirements of the
USA PATRIOT Act include requirements to adopt and
implement an effective anti-money laundering program,
report suspicious transactions or activities, and implement
due diligence procedures for correspondent and other
customer accounts. Westpac’s New York branch and
Westpac Capital Markets LLC maintain an anti-money
laundering compliance program designed to address US
legal requirements.
US economic and trade sanctions, as administered by the
Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), prohibit or
significantly restrict US financial institutions, including the US
branches and operations of foreign banks, and other US
persons from doing business with certain persons, entities
and jurisdictions. Westpac’s New York branch and
Westpac Capital Markets LLC maintain compliance
programs designed to comply with OFAC sanctions
programs, and Westpac has a Group-wide program to
ensure adequate compliance.
Legal proceedings
Our entities are defendants from time to time in legal
proceedings arising from the conduct of our business.
Material legal proceedings, if any, are described in Note 31
to the financial statements and under ‘Significant
developments’ above. Where appropriate as required by the
accounting standards, a provision has been raised in respect
of these proceedings and disclosed in the financial
statements.
Principal office
Our principal office is located at 275 Kent Street, Sydney,
New South Wales, 2000, Australia. Our telephone number
for calls within Australia is (+61) 2 9155 7713 and our
international telephone number is (+61) 2 9155 7700.
2017 Westpac Group Annual Report 25
Corporate Governance Statement
Our approach to corporate governance is based on a set of
values and behaviours that underpin day-to-day activities,
provide transparency and fair dealing and seek to protect
stakeholder interests.
This approach includes a commitment to excellence in
governance standards, which we see as fundamental to the
sustainability of our business and our performance. It
includes monitoring local and global developments in
corporate governance and assessing their implications.
We comply with the ASX Corporate Governance Principles
and Recommendations (third edition) published by the ASX
Limited’s Corporate Governance Council.
Westpac’s 2017 Corporate Governance Statement and a
range of documents referred to in it are available on our
corporate governance website at
www.westpac.com.au/corpgov. This website contains copies
and summaries of charters, principles and policies referred
to in the Corporate Governance Statement.
Websites
Investor communications and information, including this
2017 Westpac Group Annual Report, the 2017 Westpac
Group Annual Review and Sustainability Report, the 2017
Westpac Group Sustainability Performance Report and
investor discussion packs and presentations can be
accessed at www.westpac.com.au/investorcentre.
1
Directors’ report
26 2017 Westpac Group Annual Report
Our Directors present their report together with the financial statements of the Group for the financial year ended
30 September 2017.
1. Directors
The names of the persons who have been Directors, or appointed as Directors, during the period since 1 October 2016 and up
to the date of this report are: Lindsay Philip Maxsted, Brian Charles Hartzer, Elizabeth Blomfield Bryan (retired as a Director on
9 December 2016), Nerida Frances Caesar (Director from 1 September 2017), Ewen Graham Wolseley Crouch, Catriona
Alison Deans (Alison Deans), Craig William Dunn, Robert George Elstone, Peter John Oswin Hawkins and Peter Ralph
Marriott.
Particulars of the skills, experience, expertise and responsibilities of the Directors at the date of this report, including all
directorships of other listed companies held by a Director at any time in the past three years immediately before
30 September 2017 and the period for which each directorship has been held, are set out below.
Name: Lindsay Maxsted,
DipBus (Gordon), FCA, FAICD
Age: 63
Term of office: Director since
March 2008 and Chairman since
December 2011.
Date of next scheduled
re-election: December 2017.
Independent: Yes.
Current directorships of listed
entities and dates of office:
Transurban Group (since
March 2008, and Chairman since
August 2010), BHP Billiton
Limited (since March 2011) and
BHP Billiton plc (since
March 2011).
Other principal directorships:
Managing Director of Align Capital
Pty Ltd and Director of Baker Heart
and Diabetes Institute.
Other interests: Nil.
Other Westpac related entities
directorships and dates of
office: Nil.
Skills, experience and expertise:
Lindsay was formerly a partner at
KPMG and was the CEO of that
firm from 2001 to 2007. His
principal area of practice prior to
his becoming CEO was in the
corporate recovery field managing
a number of Australia’s largest
insolvency/workout/turnaround
engagements including
Linter Textiles (companies
associated with Abraham
Goldberg), Bell Publishing Group,
Bond Brewing, McEwans
Hardware and Brashs. He is also
a former Director and Chairman
of the Victorian Public Transport
Corporation.
Westpac Board Committee
membership: Chairman of the
Board Nominations Committee.
Member of each of the Board
Audit and Board Risk &
Compliance Committees.
Directorships of other listed
entities over the past three
years and dates of office: Nil.
Name: Brian Hartzer,
BA, CFA
Age: 50
Term of office: Managing
Director & Chief Executive
Officer since February 2015.
Date of next scheduled
re-election: Not applicable.
Independent: No.
Current directorships of listed
entities and dates of office:
Nil.
Other principal directorships:
The Australian National
University Business and Industry
Advisory Board (Chairman since
March 2017), the Financial
Markets Foundation for Children
and Australian Bankers’
Association Incorporated.
Other interests: Nil.
Other Westpac related entities
directorships and dates of
office: Nil.
Skills, experience and expertise:
Brian was appointed Managing
Director & Chief Executive Officer
in February 2015. Brian joined
Westpac as Chief Executive,
Australian Financial Services in
June 2012 encompassing Westpac
Retail & Business Banking,
St.George Banking Group and BT
Financial Group. Prior to joining
Westpac, Brian spent three years
in the UK as CEO for Retail,
Wealth and Ulster Bank at the
Royal Bank of Scotland Group.
Prior to that, he spent ten years
with Australia and New Zealand
Banking Group Limited (ANZ) in
Australia in a variety of roles,
including his final role as CEO,
Australia and Global Segment
Lead for Retail and Wealth.
Before joining ANZ, Brian spent
ten years as a financial services
consultant in New York, San
Francisco and Melbourne.
Westpac Board Committee
membership: Member of the
Board Technology Committee.
Directorships of other listed
entities over the past three
years and dates of office: Nil.
Directors’ report
2017 Westpac Group Annual Report 27
Name: Nerida Caesar,
BCom, MBA, GAICD
Age: 53
Term of office: Director since
September 2017.
Date of next scheduled
re-election: December 2017.
Independent: Yes.
Current directorships of listed
entities and dates of office: Nil.
Other principal directorships:
Stone and Chalk Limited and
Genome.One Pty Ltd.
Other interests: Member of the
University of Technology Vice
Chancellor’s Industry Advisory
Board and the Federal
Government’s FinTech Advisory
Group.
Other Westpac related entities
directorships and dates of
office: Nil.
Skills, experience and
expertise: Nerida has 30 years
of broad-ranging commercial and
business management
experience. Most recently,
Nerida was Group Managing
Director and Chief Executive
Officer, Australia and New
Zealand, of Equifax (formerly
Veda Group Limited) from
February 2011.
Nerida was formerly Group
Managing Director, Telstra
Enterprise and Government,
responsible for Telstra’s
corporate, government and large
business customers in Australia
as well as the international sales
division. She also worked as
Group Managing Director,
Telstra Wholesale, and prior to
that held the position of
Executive Director National
Sales where she was
responsible for
managing products, services and
customer relationships throughout
Australia.
Prior to joining Telstra, Nerida
held several senior management
and sales positions with IBM
within Australia and internationally
over a 20 year period, including
as Vice President of IBM’s Intel
Server Division for the Asia
Pacific region.
Westpac Board Committee
membership: Member of each of
the Board Risk & Compliance and
Board Technology Committees.
Directorships of other listed
entities over the past three
years and dates of office: Veda
Group Limited (December 2013 –
February 2016). Veda Group
Limited was a listed entity from
December 2013 to February 2016
when it was delisted upon its
acquisition by Equifax Inc.
Name: Ewen Crouch AM,
BEc (Hons.), LLB, FAICD
Age: 61
Term of office: Director since
February 2013.
Date of next scheduled
re-election: December 2019.
Independent: Yes.
Current directorships of listed
entities and dates of office:
BlueScope Steel Limited (since
March 2013).
Other principal directorships:
Sydney Symphony Orchestra
Holdings Pty Limited and Jawun.
Other interests: Member of the
Commonwealth Remuneration
Tribunal, Law Committee of the
Australian Institute of Company
Directors and Corporations
Committee of the Law Council of
Australia.
Other Westpac related entities
directorships and dates of
office: Nil.
Skills, experience and
expertise: Ewen was a Partner
at Allens from 1988 to 2013,
where he was one of Australia’s
most accomplished mergers and
acquisitions lawyers. He served
as a member of the firm’s board
for 11 years, including four years
as Chairman of Partners. His
other roles at Allens included Co-
Head Mergers and Acquisitions
and Equity Capital Markets,
Executive Partner, Asian offices
and Deputy Managing Partner.
He is now a Consultant to Allens.
Ewen served as a director of
Mission Australia from 1995 and
as Chairman from 2009, before
retiring in November 2016. From
2010 to 2015, Ewen was a
member of the Takeovers Panel.
In 2013, Ewen was awarded an
Order of Australia in recognition
of his significant service to the
law as a contributor to legal
professional organisations and
to the community.
Westpac Board Committee
membership: Chairman of the
Board Risk & Compliance
Committee. Member of each of
the Board Nominations and
Board Remuneration
Committees.
Directorships of other listed
entities over the past three
years and dates of office: Nil.
1
28 2017 Westpac Group Annual Report
Name: Alison Deans,
BA, MBA, GAICD
Age: 49
Term of office: Director since
April 2014.
Date of next scheduled
re-election: December 2017.
Independent: Yes.
Current directorships of listed
entities and dates of office:
Cochlear Limited (since
January 2015).
Other principal directorships:
kikki.K Holdings Pty Ltd and
SCEGGS Darlinghurst Limited.
Other interests: Senior Advisor,
McKinsey & Company and
Investment Committee member
of the CSIRO Innovation Fund
(Main Sequence Ventures).
Other Westpac related entities
directorships and dates of
office: Nil.
Skills, experience and
expertise: Alison has more than
20 years’ experience in senior
executive roles focused on
building digital businesses and
digital transformation across
e-commerce, media and financial
services. During this time, Alison
served as the CEO of eCorp
Limited, CEO of Hoyts Cinemas
and CEO of eBay, Australia and
New Zealand. She was the CEO
of a technology-based
investment company netus Pty
Ltd. Alison was an Independent
Director of Social Ventures
Australia from September 2007
to April 2013.
Westpac Board Committee
membership: Member of each
of the Board Risk & Compliance
and Board Technology
Committees.
Directorships of other listed
entities over the past three
years and dates of office:
Insurance Australia Group
Limited (February 2013 –
October 2017).
Name: Craig Dunn,
BCom, FCA
Age: 54
Term of office: Director since
June 2015.
Date of next scheduled
re-election: December 2018.
Independent: Yes.
Current directorships of listed
entities and dates of office:
Telstra Corporation Limited
(since April 2016).
Other principal directorships:
Financial Literacy Australia
Limited, Chairman of The
Australian Ballet and Chairman
of Stone and Chalk Limited.
Other interests: Chairman of
the Australian Government’s
Fintech Advisory Group and the
International Standards
Technical Committee on
Blockchain and
Distributed Ledger Technologies
(ISO/TC 307). Member of the
ASIC External Advisory Panel,
and the New South Wales
Government’s Quantum
Computing Fund Advisory Panel.
Board member of Jobs for New
South Wales and Consultant to
King & Wood Mallesons.
Other Westpac related entities
directorships and dates of
office: Nil.
Skills, experience and
expertise: Craig has more than
20 years’ experience in financial
services, including as CEO of
AMP Limited from 2008 to 2013.
Craig was previously a Board
member of the Australian
Japanese Business Cooperation
Committee and the New South
Wales Government’s Financial
Services Knowledge Hub, and
former Chairman of the
Investment and Financial
Services Association (now the
Financial Services Council). He
was also a member of the
Financial Services Advisory
Committee, the Australian
Financial Centre Forum, the
Consumer and Financial
Literacy Taskforce and a Panel
member of the Australian
Government’s Financial System
Inquiry.
Westpac Board Committee
membership: Chairman of the
Board Remuneration
Committee. Member of each of
the Board Nominations and
Board Risk & Compliance
Committees.
Directorships of other listed
entities over the past three
years and dates of office: Nil.
Directors’ report
2017 Westpac Group Annual Report 29
Name: Robert Elstone,
BA (Hons.), MA (Econ.), MCom
Age: 64
Term of office: Director since
February 2012.
Date of next scheduled
re-election: Not applicable.
Robert Elstone will retire
following the 2017 AGM.
Independent: Yes.
Current directorships of listed
entities and dates of office: Nil.
Other principal directorships:
University of Western Australia
Business School.
Other interests: Adjunct
Professor at the Business
Schools of the Universities of
Sydney and Western Australia.
Other Westpac related entities
directorships and dates of
office: Nil.
Skills, experience and
expertise: Robert has over
30 years’ experience in senior
management roles spanning
investment banking, corporate
finance, wholesale financial
markets and risk management.
From July 2006 to October 2011,
Robert was Managing Director
and CEO of ASX Limited.
Previously, he was Managing
Director and CEO of the Sydney
Futures Exchange from
May 2000 to July 2006, and from
January 1995 to May 2000, he
was Finance Director of Pioneer
International. Robert was a Non-
executive Director of the
National Australia Bank from
September 2004 to July 2006,
an inaugural member of the
Board of Guardians of the
Future Fund, and former
Chairman of the Financial
Sector Advisory Council to the
Federal Treasurer.
Westpac Board Committee
membership: Member of each
of the Board Audit, Board
Remuneration and Board Risk &
Compliance Committees.
Directorships of other listed
entities over the past three
years and dates of office: Nil.
Name: Peter Hawkins,
BCA (Hons.), SF Fin, FAIM,
ACA (NZ), FAICD
Age: 63
Term of office: Director since
December 2008.
Date of next scheduled
re-election: December 2017.
Independent: Yes.
Current directorships of listed
entities and dates of office:
Mirvac Group (since
January 2006).
Other principal directorships:
Liberty Financial Pty Ltd and
Crestone Holdings Limited.
Other interests: Nil.
Other Westpac related entities
directorships and dates of
office: Member of the Bank of
Melbourne Advisory Board since
November 2010.
Skills, experience and
expertise: Peter’s career in the
banking and financial services
industry spans over 40 years in
Australia and overseas at both
the highest levels of
management and directorship of
major organisations. Peter has
held various senior management
and directorship positions with
Australia and New Zealand
Banking Group Limited from
1971 to 2005.
He was also previously a Director
of BHP (NZ) Steel Limited,
ING Australia Limited, Esanda
Finance Corporation, Visa Inc and
Clayton Utz.
Westpac Board Committee
membership: Chairman of the
Board Technology Committee.
Member of each of the Board
Audit, Board Nominations and
Board Risk & Compliance
Committees.
Directorships of other listed
entities over the past three
years and dates of office: MG
Responsible Entity Limited, which
is the responsible entity for ASX
listed MG Unit Trust (April 2015 to
October 2016).
Name: Peter Marriott,
BEc (Hons.), FCA
Age: 60
Term of office: Director since
June 2013.
Date of next scheduled
re-election: December 2019.
Independent: Yes.
Current directorships of listed
entities and dates of office:
ASX Limited (since July 2009).
Other principal directorships:
ASX Clearing Corporation
Limited, ASX Settlement
Corporation Limited and
Austraclear Limited.
Other interests: Member of the
Review Panel & Policy Council of
the Banking & Finance Oath.
Other Westpac related entities
directorships and dates of
office: Nil.
Skills, experience and
expertise: Peter has over
30 years’ experience in senior
management roles in the finance
industry encompassing
international banking, finance
and auditing. Peter joined
Australia and New Zealand
Banking Group Limited (ANZ) in
1993 and held the role of Chief
Financial Officer from July 1997
to May 2012. Prior to his career
at ANZ, Peter was a banking and
finance, audit and consulting
partner at KPMG Peat Marwick.
Peter was formerly a Director of
ANZ National Bank Limited in
New Zealand and various ANZ
subsidiaries.
Westpac Board Committee
membership: Chairman of the
Board Audit Committee. Member
of each of the Board Nominations,
Board Risk & Compliance and
Board Technology Committees.
Directorships of other listed
entities over the past three
years and dates of office: Nil.
1
30 2017 Westpac Group Annual Report
Company Secretary
Our Company Secretaries as at 30 September 2017 were Rebecca Lim and Tim Hartin.
Rebecca Lim (B Econ, LLB (Hons.)) was appointed as a Group Executive effective 1 October 2016, with her title now being
Group Executive, Compliance, Legal & Secretariat
1
, as well as Company Secretary. Rebecca joined Westpac in 2002 and has
held a variety of senior leadership roles including General Manager, Human Resources for St.George Bank and General
Manager, St.George Private Clients. She was appointed Group General Counsel in November 2011 and Chief Compliance
Officer from 2013 to 2017. Rebecca held an in-house role in investment banking at Goldman Sachs in London after which she
joined Westpac on her return to Australia. Rebecca was previously with US firm Skadden Arps where she worked in the
Corporate Finance area in both New York and London. Prior to that she worked at Blake Dawson Waldron (now Ashurst) as a
solicitor.
Tim Hartin (LLB (Hons.)) was appointed Group Company Secretary in November 2011. Before that appointment, Tim was
Head of Legal - Risk Management & Workouts, Counsel & Secretariat and prior to that, he was Counsel, Corporate Core.
Before joining Westpac in 2006, Tim was a Consultant with Gilbert + Tobin, where he provided corporate advisory services to
ASX listed companies. Tim was previously a lawyer at Henderson Boyd Jackson W.S. in Scotland and in London in Herbert
Smith’s corporate and corporate finance division.
2. Executive Team
As at 30 September 2017 our Executive Team was:
Name Position
Year Joined
Group
Year Appointed
to Position
Brian Hartzer Managing Director & Chief Executive Officer 2012 2015
Lyn Cobley Chief Executive, Westpac Institutional Bank 2015 2015
Brad Cooper Chief Executive Officer, BT Financial Group 2007 2010
Dave Curran Chief Information Officer 2014 2014
George Frazis Chief Executive, Consumer Bank 2009 2015
Alexandra Holcomb Chief Risk Officer 1996 2014
Peter King Chief Financial Officer 1994 2014
Rebecca Lim
1
Group Executive, Compliance, Legal & Secretariat 2002 2016
David Lindberg Chief Executive, Business Bank 2012 2015
David McLean Chief Executive Officer, Westpac New Zealand Limited 1999 2015
Christine Parker Group Executive, Human Resources, Corporate Affairs & Sustainability 2007 2011
Gary Thursby Group Executive, Strategy & Enterprise Services 2008 2016
There are no family relationships between or among any of our Directors or Executive Team members.
1
Prior to 2 October 2017, Rebecca Lim’s title was Group General Counsel & Chief Compliance Officer.
Directors’ report
2017 Westpac Group Annual Report 31
Brian Hartzer BA, CFA. Age 50
Managing Director & Chief Executive Officer
Brian was appointed Managing Director & Chief Executive Officer in February 2015. Brian joined Westpac
as Chief Executive, Australian Financial Services in June 2012 encompassing Westpac Retail & Business
Banking, St.George Banking Group and BT Financial Group.
Brian is a Director of the Australian Bankers’ Association and was formerly the Chairman until December
2015. Prior to joining Westpac, Brian spent three years in the UK as CEO for Retail, Wealth and Ulster
Bank at the Royal Bank of Scotland Group. Prior to that, he spent ten years with Australia and New
Zealand Banking Group Limited (ANZ) in Australia in a variety of roles, including his final role as CEO,
Australia and Global Segment Lead for Retail and Wealth. Before joining ANZ, Brian spent ten years as a
financial services consultant in New York, San Francisco and Melbourne.
Brian graduated from Princeton University with a degree in European History and is a Chartered Financial
Analyst.
Lyn Cobley BEc, SF FIN, GAICD. Age 54
Chief Executive, Westpac Institutional Bank
Lyn was appointed Chief Executive, Westpac Institutional Bank in September 2015. She has responsibility
for Westpac’s global relationships with corporate, institutional and government clients as well as all
products across financial and capital markets, transactional banking, structured finance and working
capital payments. In addition, Lyn oversees Hastings Funds Management as well as Westpac’s
International and Pacific Island businesses.
Lyn has over 25 years’ experience in financial services. Prior to joining Westpac, Lyn held a variety of
senior positions at the Commonwealth Bank of Australia including serving as Group Treasurer from 2007
to 2013 and most recently as Executive General Manager, Retail Products & Third Party Banking. She
was also Head of Financial Institutions at Barclays Capital in Australia, held senior roles at Citibank in
Australia and Asia Pacific including Head of Securitisation and was CEO of Trading Room (a joint venture
between Macquarie Bank and Fairfax).
Lyn is a Board member of the Australian Financial Markets Association (AFMA), the Banking & Finance
Oath and the Westpac Foundation. She is Chairman of Westpac’s Asia Advisory Board and is also a
member of Chief Executive Women.
Lyn has a Bachelor of Economics from Macquarie University, is a Senior Fellow of the Financial Services
Institute of Australia and is a graduate of the Australian Institute of Company Directors.
Brad Cooper DipBM, MBA. Age 55
Chief Executive Officer, BT Financial Group
Brad was appointed Chief Executive Officer, BT Financial Group in February 2010. Brad initially joined
Westpac in April 2007 as Chief Executive, Westpac New Zealand Limited and after successfully leading a
change program in that market, moved to the role of Group Chief Transformation Officer, leading the
Westpac Group’s St.George merger implementation. Prior to joining Westpac, Brad was Chairman of GE
Capital Bank and CEO of GE Consumer Finance UK & Ireland. He drove GE’s UK Six Sigma program and
was certified as a Quality Leader (Black Belt) in December 2002. He was promoted to CEO of GE
Consumer Finance UK in January 2003 and appointed Chairman of GE Capital Bank in April 2004.
Dave Curran BCom. Age 52
Chief Information Officer
Dave was appointed Chief Information Officer in September 2014. Dave has almost 30 years of
experience with proven expertise in IT and financial services and the implementation of large, complex
projects.
Since 2015, Dave has been on the Board of the Westpac Bicentennial Foundation, a $100 million
scholarship fund with exclusive focus on Australian education and leadership.
Before joining Westpac, Dave spent ten years in senior roles at the Commonwealth Bank of Australia
(CBA). Before joining CBA, he spent sixteen years at Accenture, where he was a partner, primarily
consulting on financial services.
1
32 2017 Westpac Group Annual Report
George Frazis B Eng (Hons.), MBA (AGSM/Wharton). Age 53
Chief Executive, Consumer Bank
George was appointed Chief Executive, Consumer Bank in June 2015, responsible for managing the end
to end relationship with consumer customers. This includes all consumer distribution, digital, marketing,
transformation and banking products and services under the Westpac, St.George, BankSA, Bank of
Melbourne and RAMS brands.
Prior to this appointment, he was CEO, St.George Banking Group. George joined the Westpac Group in
March 2009 as Chief Executive, Westpac New Zealand Limited. George is highly experienced in the
financial services industry. He was formerly Group Executive General Manager at National Australia Bank.
Prior to that, George was a senior executive in Commonwealth Bank of Australia’s Institutional Banking
Division and has also been a partner with the Boston Consulting Group and an officer in the Royal
Australian Air Force. George is a Governor of the St.George Foundation and is Chair of the Prime
Minister’s Industry Advisory Committee on Veterans’ Employment.
Alexandra Holcomb BA, MBA, MA. Age 56
Chief Risk Officer
Alexandra was appointed Chief Risk Officer in August 2014. As Westpac Group’s Chief Risk Officer,
Alexandra is responsible for key risk management activities across the enterprise.
Since joining Westpac in 1996, Alexandra has held a number of senior positions including Group General
Manager, Group Strategy, M&A and Major Projects, Group Executive, Group Strategy, Head of Westpac
Institutional Bank Strategy, and until August 2014 was the Group General Manager of Global
Transactional Services.
Prior to joining Westpac, Alexandra was a senior executive from 1992 to 1996 with Booz Allen & Hamilton
International where she specialised in international credit, working throughout the Asia Pacific region.
Before that, she worked with Chase Manhattan Bank in New York in private and business banking and
international credit audit. She also worked in project finance in Paris and New York for Banque Indosuez
and Barclays Bank respectively.
Alexandra is Deputy Chairman of the Asia Society Australia and serves on the Westpac Foundation Board.
She is a member of Chief Executive Women and a Fellow of the Australian Institute of Company Directors.
Alexandra has an MBA in Finance and Multinational Management from the Wharton School of Business
and a Master of Arts in International Studies and French from the University of Pennsylvania. She also
holds a BA in English and Economics from Cornell University.
Peter King BEc, FCA. Age 47
Chief Financial Officer
Peter was appointed Chief Financial Officer in April 2014, with responsibility for Westpac’s Finance, Group
Audit, Tax, Treasury and Investor Relations functions. Prior to this appointment, Peter was the Deputy
Chief Financial Officer for three years.
Since joining Westpac in 1994, Peter has held senior finance positions across the Group, including in
Group Finance, Business and Consumer Banking, Business and Technology Services, Treasury and
Financial Markets.
Peter commenced his career at Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu. He has a Bachelor of Economics from Sydney
University and completed the Advanced Management Programme at INSEAD. He is a Fellow of the
Institute of Chartered Accountants.
Rebecca Lim B Econ, LLB (Hons). Age 45
Group Executive, Compliance, Legal & Secretariat
Rebecca was appointed as Westpac’s Group Executive responsible for compliance, legal and secretariat
functions globally from October 2016. She was appointed Group General Counsel in November 2011 and
was Chief Compliance Officer from 2013 to 2017.
Rebecca joined Westpac in 2002 and has held a variety of other senior leadership roles including General
Manager, Human Resources for St.George Bank and General Manager, St.George Private Clients.
Rebecca began her career at Blake Dawson Waldron (now Ashurst) before joining the US firm Skadden
Arps where she worked in both New York and London. Rebecca then moved into an in-house role in
investment banking at Goldman Sachs in London before returning to Australia and joining Westpac.
Rebecca is Deputy Chair of the GC100 Executive Committee and a member of Chief Executive Women.
Directors’ report
2017 Westpac Group Annual Report 33
David Lindberg HBA (Hons. Economics). Age 42
Chief Executive, Business Bank
David was appointed Chief Executive, Business Bank in June 2015. He manages the Group’s end to end
relationships with business customers for the Westpac, St.George, BankSA and Bank of Melbourne
brands. The Business Bank provides a wide range of banking and financial products and services to
Australia’s small, commercial, corporate and agri businesses.
Prior to this appointment, David was Chief Product Officer, responsible for the Group’s retail and business
products across all brands, as well as overseeing the Group’s digital activities. Before joining Westpac in
2012, David was Executive General Manager, Cards, Payments & Retail Strategy at the Commonwealth
Bank of Australia. David was also formerly Managing Director, Strategy, Marketing & Customer
Segmentation at Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited and Managing Vice President and
Head of Australia for First Manhattan.
David McLean LLB (Hons.). Age 59
Chief Executive Officer, Westpac New Zealand Limited
David was appointed Chief Executive Officer, Westpac New Zealand Limited in February 2015. Since
joining Westpac in February 1999, David has held a number of senior roles, including Head of Debt Capital
Markets New Zealand, General Manager, Private, Wealth and Insurance New Zealand and Head of
Westpac Institutional Bank New Zealand, and most recently, Managing Director of the Westpac New York
branch.
Before joining Westpac, David was Director, Capital Markets at Deutsche Morgan Grenfell since 1994. He
also established the New Zealand branch of Deutsche Bank and was New Zealand Resident Branch
Manager. In 1988, David joined Southpac/National Bank as a Capital Markets Executive. Prior to this,
David worked as a lawyer in private practice and also served as in‐house counsel for NatWest NZ from
1985. David is a Barrister & Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand.
Christine Parker BGDipBus (HRM). Age 57
Group Executive, Human Resources, Corporate Affairs & Sustainability
Christine was appointed Group Executive, Human Resources, Corporate Affairs & Sustainability in
October 2011, with responsibility for human resources strategy and management, including reward and
recognition, safety, learning and development, careers and talent, employee relations and employment
policy. She is also responsible for Corporate Affairs and Sustainability, and Customer Advocacy.
Prior to this appointment, she was Group General Manager, Human Resources, from March 2010, with
responsibilities across the entire Westpac Group. Prior to that, Christine was General Manager, Human
Resources, Westpac New Zealand Limited.
Prior to joining Westpac in 2007, Christine was Group Human Resources Director, Carter Holt Harvey, and
from 1999 to 2004, she was Director of Human Resources with Restaurant Brands New Zealand.
Christine is a Governor of the St.George Foundation and also a Director of Women’s Community Shelters.
Gary Thursby BEc, DipAcc, FCA. Age 55
Group Executive, Strategy & Enterprise Services
Gary was appointed Group Executive Strategy & Enterprise Services in October 2016. In addition to
leading the Group’s strategy function, his role is designed to accelerate the delivery of the Group’s Service
Revolution and provide services to support the Group’s operating businesses.
Gary’s responsibilities also include banking operations, procurement, property, analytics, and enterprise
investments. In addition, Gary oversees the Group’s mergers & acquisitions and business development
portfolios.
Before joining Westpac in 2008, Gary held a number of senior finance roles at Commonwealth Bank of
Australia (CBA) including Deputy CFO and CFO Retail Bank. Gary has over 20 years’ experience in
financial services, covering finance, M&A and large scale program delivery. He commenced his career at
Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu.
Gary has a Bachelor of Economics and a Post Graduate Diploma in Accounting from Flinders University of
South Australia and is a Fellow of the Institute of Chartered Accountants.
1
34 2017 Westpac Group Annual Report
3. Report on the business
Principal activities a)
The principal activities of the Group during the financial year ended 30 September 2017 were the provision of financial services
including lending, deposit taking, payments services, investment portfolio management and advice, superannuation and funds
management, insurance services, leasing finance, general finance, interest rate risk management and foreign exchange
services.
There have been no significant changes in the nature of the principal activities of the Group during 2017.
Operating and financial review
b)
The net profit attributable to equity holders of Westpac for the financial year ended 30 September 2017 was $7,990 million, an
increase of $545 million or 7% compared to 2016. Key features of this result were:
a 4% increase in net operating income before operating expenses and impairment charges with:
– net interest income of $15,516 million, an increase of $368 million or 2% compared to 2016, with total loan growth of 3%
and a 4 basis point decrease in net interest margin to 2.06%; and
– non-interest income of $6,286 million, an increase of $449 million or 8% compared to 2016, primarily due to a $279
million gain associated with the sale of shares in BT Investment Management Limited (BTIM), a rise in trading income of
$78 million and the impact of volatility in economic hedges of $140 million. These increases were partly offset by
provisions for customer refunds and lower wealth management and insurance income;
operating expenses were $9,434 million, an increase of $217 million or 2% compared to 2016 due to annual salary and
rental increases, higher technology expenses related to the Group’s investment program, a rise in regulatory and
compliance costs and expenses associated with the sale of shares in BTIM. These increases were partially offset by
productivity benefits; and
impairment charges were $853 million, a decrease of $271 million or 24% compared to 2016. Asset quality remained
sound, with stressed exposures as a percentage of total committed exposures at 1.05%, down 15 basis points over the
year. The decrease in impairment charges was primarily due to significantly lower large individual provisions. Additional
provisioning for these larger facilities was required in 2016, following the downgrade to impaired.
A review of the operations of the Group and its divisions and their results for the financial year ended 30 September 2017 is set
out in Section 2 of the Annual Report under the sections ‘Review of Group operations’, ‘Divisional performance’ and ‘Risk and
risk management’, which form part of this report.
Further information about our financial position and financial results is included in the financial statements in Section 3 of this
Annual Report, which form part of this report.
Dividends
c)
Since 30 September 2017, Westpac has announced a final ordinary dividend of 94 cents per Westpac ordinary share, totalling
approximately $3,191 million for the year ended 30 September 2017 (2016 final ordinary dividend of 94 cents per Westpac
ordinary share, totalling approximately $3,145 million). The dividend will be fully franked and will be paid on 22 December 2017.
An interim ordinary dividend for the current financial year of 94 cents per Westpac ordinary share for the half year ended
31 March 2017, totalling $3,156 million, was paid as a fully franked dividend on 4 July 2017 (2016 interim ordinary dividend of
94 cents per Westpac ordinary share, totalling $3,136 million). The payment comprised direct cash disbursements of
$2,031 million with $1,125 million being reinvested by participants through the DRP.
Further, in respect of the year ended 30 September 2016, a fully franked final dividend of 94 cents per ordinary share totalling
$3,145 million was paid on 21 December 2016. The payment comprised direct cash disbursements of $2,818 million with
$327 million being reinvested by participants through the DRP.
New shares were issued to satisfy the DRP for each of the 2016 final ordinary dividend and the 2017 interim ordinary dividend.
Significant changes in state of affairs and events during and since the end of the 2017 financial year
d)
Significant changes in the state of affairs of the Group were:
introduction of the Federal Government’s Bank Levy for ADIs. The Bank Levy cost Westpac $95 million in Full Year 2017,
with an after tax impact of $66 million and is estimated to cost Westpac approximately $405 million in Full Year 2018, with
an after tax impact of approximately $284 million;
the sale by Westpac of 60 million shares in BTIM for $10.75 per share;
the issuance of US$1.25 billion AT1 securities, which qualify as Additional Tier 1 capital under APRA’s capital adequacy
framework;
the proposed sale by Westpac of its interest in Hastings Management Pty Limited, which is subject to confirmatory due
diligence and regulatory approvals; and
Directors’ report
2017 Westpac Group Annual Report 35
ongoing regulatory changes and developments, which have included changes relating to liquidity, capital, financial
services, taxation, executive accountability and other regulatory requirements.
For a discussion of these matters, please refer to ‘Significant developments’ in Section 1 under ‘Information on Westpac’.
The Directors are not aware of any other matter or circumstance that has occurred since the end of the financial year that has
significantly affected or may significantly affect the operations of the Group, the results of these operations or the state of affairs
of the Group in subsequent financial years.
Business strategies, developments and expected results
e)
Our business strategies, prospects and likely major developments in the Group’s operations in future financial years and the
expected results of those operations are discussed in Section 1 of the Annual Report under ‘Information on Westpac’, including
under ‘Outlook’ and ‘Significant developments’.
Further information on our business strategies and prospects for future financial years and likely developments in our
operations and the expected results of operations have not been included in this report because the Directors believe it would
be likely to result in unreasonable prejudice to us.
4. Directors’ interests
Directors’ interests in securities a)
The following particulars for each Director are set out in the Remuneration Report in Section 10 of the Directors’ report for the
year ended 30 September 2017 and in the tables below:
their relevant interests in our shares or the shares of any of our related bodies corporate;
their relevant interests in debentures of, or interests in, any registered managed investment scheme made available by us
or any of our related bodies corporate;
their rights or options over shares in, debentures of, or interests in, any registered managed investment scheme made
available by us or any of our related bodies corporate; and
any contracts:
– to which the Director is a party or under which they are entitled to a benefit; and
– that confer a right to call for or deliver shares in, debentures of, or interests in, any registered managed investment
scheme made available by us or any of our related bodies corporate.
1
36 2017 Westpac Group Annual Report
Directors’ interests in Westpac and related bodies corporate as at 6 November 2017
Number of Relevant Interests in
Westpac
Ordinary Shares
Number of Westpac
Share Rights
Westpac
CPS
Westpac Banking Corporation
Current Directors
Lindsay Maxsted 20,689
-
-
Brian Hartzer 77,427
1
569,426
2
-
Nerida Caesar
-
-
-
Ewen Crouch 36,450
3
-
-
Alison Deans
9,392
-
-
Craig Dunn
8,869
-
-
Robert Elstone 12,096
-
-
Peter Hawkins
15,880
4
-
1,370
Peter Marriott
20,870
-
-
1
Brian Hartzer’s interest in Westpac ordinary shares includes 20,222 restricted shares held under the CEO Restricted Share Plan.
2
Share rights issued under the CEO Long Term Incentive Plan and Long Term Incentive Plan.
3
Ewen Crouch and his related bodies corporate also hold relevant interests in 250 Westpac Capital Notes 2.
4
Peter Hawkins and his related bodies corporate also hold relevant interests in 850 Westpac Capital Notes 3 and 882 Westpac Capital Notes 4.
Note: Certain subsidiaries of Westpac offer a range of registered schemes. The Directors from time to time invest in these schemes and are required to
provide a statement to the ASX when any of their interests in these schemes change. ASIC has exempted each Director from the obligation to notify the
ASX of a relevant interest in a security that is an interest in BT Cash Management Trust (ARSN 087 531 539), BT Premium Cash Fund (ARSN 089 299
730), Westpac Cash Management Trust (ARSN 088 187 928), BT Wholesale Managed Cash Fund (ARSN 088 832 491), BT Wholesale Enhanced Cash
Fund (ARSN 088 863 469), Advance Cash Multi-Blend Fund (ARSN 094 113 050) or BT Cash (ARSN 164 257 854).
Directors’ report
2017 Westpac Group Annual Report 37
Indemnities and insurance b)
Under the Westpac Constitution, unless prohibited by statute, we indemnify each of the Directors and Company Secretaries of
Westpac and of each of our related bodies corporate (except related bodies corporate listed on a recognised stock exchange),
each employee of Westpac or our subsidiaries (except subsidiaries listed on a recognised stock exchange), and each person
acting as a responsible manager under an Australian Financial Services Licence of any of Westpac’s wholly-owned
subsidiaries against every liability (other than a liability for legal costs) incurred by each such person in their capacity as
director, company secretary, employee or responsible manager, as the case may be; and all legal costs incurred in defending
or resisting (or otherwise in connection with) proceedings, whether civil or criminal or of an administrative or investigatory
nature, in which the person becomes involved because of that capacity.
Each of the Directors named in this Directors’ report and each of the Company Secretaries of Westpac has the benefit of
this indemnity.
Consistent with shareholder approval at the 2000 Annual General Meeting, Westpac has entered into a Deed of Access and
Indemnity with each of the Directors, which includes indemnification in identical terms to that provided in the Westpac
Constitution.
Westpac also executed a deed poll in September 2009 providing indemnification equivalent to that provided under the Westpac
Constitution to individuals acting as:
statutory officers (other than as a director) of Westpac;
directors and other statutory officers of wholly-owned subsidiaries of Westpac; and
directors and statutory officers of other nominated companies as approved by Westpac in accordance with the terms of the
deed poll and Westpac’s Contractual Indemnity Policy.
Some employees of Westpac’s related bodies corporate and responsible managers of Westpac and its related bodies
corporate are also currently covered by a deed poll that was executed in November 2004, which is in similar terms to the
September 2009 deed poll.
The Westpac Constitution also permits us, to the extent permitted by law, to pay or agree to pay premiums for contracts
insuring any person who is or has been a Director or Company Secretary of Westpac or any of its related bodies corporate
against liability incurred by that person in that capacity, including a liability for legal costs, unless:
we are forbidden by statute to pay or agree to pay the premium; or
the contract would, if we paid the premium, be made void by statute.
Under the September 2009 deed poll, Westpac also agrees to provide directors’ and officers’ insurance to Directors of Westpac
and Directors of Westpac’s wholly-owned subsidiaries.
For the year ended 30 September 2017, the Group has insurance cover which, in certain circumstances, will provide
reimbursement for amounts which we have to pay under the indemnities set out above. That cover is subject to the terms and
conditions of the relevant insurance, including but not limited to the limit of indemnity provided by the insurance. The insurance
policies prohibit disclosure of the premium payable and the nature of the liabilities covered.
Options and share rights outstanding
c)
As at the date of this report there are 256,840 share options outstanding and 5,107,825 share rights outstanding in relation to
Westpac ordinary shares. The expiry date of the share options range between 17 December 2017 and 1 October 2018 and the
weighted average exercise price is $26.36. The latest dates for exercise of the share rights range between 17 December 2017
and 1 October 2032.
Holders of outstanding share options and share rights in relation to Westpac ordinary shares do not have any rights under the
share options and share rights to participate in any share issue or interest of Westpac or any other body corporate.
Proceedings on behalf of Westpac
d)
No application has been made and no proceedings have been brought or intervened in, on behalf of Westpac under
section 237 of the Corporations Act.
1
38 2017 Westpac Group Annual Report
5. Environmental disclosure
As part of our 2017 Sustainability Strategy, we have set
targets for our environmental performance. The Westpac
Group’s environmental framework starts with ‘Our Principles
for Doing Business’, which outline our broad environmental
principles. This framework includes:
our Westpac Group Environment Policy, which has
been in place since 1992;
our Sustainability Risk Management Framework;
our Responsible Sourcing Code of Conduct; and
public reporting of our environmental performance.
We also participate in a number of voluntary initiatives
including the Dow Jones Sustainability Index, CDP
1
, the
Equator Principles, the Principles for Responsible
Investment, the United Nations Global Compact and the
Banking Environment Initiative’s Soft Commodities Compact.
The National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting Act 2007
(Cth) (National Greenhouse Act) came into effect in
July 2008. The Group reports on greenhouse gas emissions,
energy consumption and production under the National
Greenhouse Act for the period 1 July through 30 June
each year.
The Group was previously subject to the reporting
requirements of the Energy Efficiency Opportunities Act
2006 (Cth) (EEO Act). The Commonwealth Government
repealed the EEO Act, effective from 29 June 2014.
Accordingly, all obligations and activities under the EEO
Program, including reporting requirements, have ceased.
2
Our operations are not subject to any other significant
environmental regulation under any law of the
Commonwealth of Australia or of any state or territory of
Australia. We may, however, become subject to
environmental regulation as a result of our lending activities
in the ordinary course of business and we have policies in
place to ensure that this potential risk is addressed as part of
our normal processes.
We have not incurred any liability (including for rectification
costs) under any environmental legislation.
Further details on our environmental performance, including
information on our climate change approach, details of our
emissions profile and environmental footprint, and progress
against our environmental targets and carbon neutral
program are available on our website at
www.westpac.com.au/sustainability.
1
Formerly known as the Carbon Disclosure Project.
2
Westpac implemented energy efficiency opportunities that are
expected to result in estimated energy savings of 14,964GJ, carbon
savings of 2,858 tCO2e and cost savings of $791,544 per year.
6. Human rights supply chain disclosure
Westpac’s overall approach to human rights is set out in our
Westpac Group Human Rights Position Statement, and this
references our Responsible Sourcing Code of Conduct as
the primary framework for managing human rights in our
supply chain.
The Group is subject to the United Kingdom’s Transparency
in Supply Chains provisions under the Modern Slavery Act
2015, which came into effect in March 2015. Westpac
releases an annual statement each year for the period
ended 30 September to disclose the steps taken during the
year to help prevent modern slavery from occurring within
the Group’s operations and supply chain.
7. Rounding of amounts
Westpac is an entity to which ASIC Corporations Instrument
2016/191 dated 24 March 2016, relating to the rounding of
amounts in directors’ reports and financial reports, applies.
Pursuant to this Instrument, amounts in this Directors’ report
and the accompanying financial report have been rounded to
the nearest million dollars, unless indicated to the contrary.
8. Political expenditure
In line with Westpac policy, no cash donations were made to
political parties during the financial year ended
30 September 2017.
In Australia, political expenditure for the financial year ended
30 September 2017 was $162,726. This relates to payment
for participation in legitimate political activities where they
were assessed to be of direct business relevance to
Westpac. Such activities include business observer
programs attached to annual party conferences, policy
dialogue forums and other political functions, such as
speeches and events with industry participants.
In New Zealand, political expenditure for the financial year
ended 30 September 2017 was NZD$2,756. In line with
Westpac policy, no cash donations were made to political
parties in New Zealand during the year.
Directors’ report
2017 Westpac Group Annual Report 39
9. Directors’ meetings
Each Director attended the following meetings of the Board and Committees of the Board during the financial year ended
30 September 2017:
Notes Board
Audit
Committee
Risk & Compliance
Committee
Nominations
Committee
Remuneration
Committee
Technology
Committee
Number of meetings
held during the year
Directo
r A B A B A B A B A B A B
Lindsay Maxsted 1
9 9 4 4 4 4 4 4 - - - -
Brian Hartzer 2 9 9 - - - - - - - - 4 4
Elizabeth Bryan 3
2 2 - - 1 1 1 1 2 2 - -
Nerida Caesar 4
1 1 - - - - - - - - - -
Ewen Crouch 5
9 9 - - 4 4 4 4 6 6 - -
Alison Deans 6
9 9 - - 4 4 - - - - 4 4
Craig Dunn 7
9 9 - - 4 4 3 3 6 6 - -
Robert Elstone 8
9 9 4 4 4 4 - - 6 6 - -
Peter Hawkins 9
9 9 4 4 4 3 4 4 - - 4 4
Peter Marriott 10
9 9 4 4 4 4 4 4 - - 4 4
This table shows membership of standing Committees of the Board. From time to time the Board may form other committees or
request Directors to undertake specific extra duties.
A - Meetings eligible to attend as a member B - Meetings attended as a member
Unless otherwise stated, each Director has been a member, or the Chairman, of the relevant Committee for the whole of the
period from 1 October 2016.
1
Chairman of the Board Nominations Committee. Member of the Board Audit Committee and the Board Risk & Compliance Committee.
2
Member of the Board Technology Committee.
3
Elizabeth Bryan retired from the Board and its Committees on 9 December 2016.
4
Nerida Caesar was appointed as a Director on 1 September 2017. Member of the Board Risk & Compliance Committee and Board Technology
Committee from 28 September 2017.
5
Chairman of the Board Risk & Compliance Committee from 9 December 2016. Chairman of the Board Remuneration Committee, and member of the
Board Risk & Compliance Committee, until 9 December 2016. Member of the Board Nominations Committee and from 9 December 2016, a member
of the Board Remuneration Committee.
6
Member of the Board Risk & Compliance Committee and the Board Technology Committee.
7
Chairman of the Board Remuneration Committee from 9 December 2016. Member of the Board Remuneration Committee until 9 December 2016.
Member of the Board Risk & Compliance Committee, and from 9 December 2016, a member of the Board Nominations Committee.
8
Member of the Board Remuneration Committee, the Board Risk & Compliance Committee and the Board Audit Committee.
9
Chairman of the Board Technology Committee. Member of the Board Audit Committee, the Board Nominations Committee and the Board Risk &
Compliance Committee.
10
Chairman of the Board Audit Committee. Member of the Board Risk & Compliance Committee, the Board Technology Committee and the Board
Nominations Committee.
1
40 2017 Westpac Group Annual Report
10. Remuneration Report
Introduction from the Chairman of the Board Remuneration Committee
Dear Shareholder,
We are pleased to present Westpac’s 2017 Remuneration Report (Report).
The past year has seen significant developments in the banking industry relating to remuneration. The Banking Executive
Accountability Regime (BEAR) will be put before Parliament and the Retail Banking Remuneration Review commissioned by
the Australian Banker’s Association (known as the Sedgwick report) was released earlier this year.
A comprehensive review is being undertaken in anticipation of the enactment of the BEAR legislation to ensure that our CEO
and Group Executive remuneration framework and principles remain consistent with both the letter and spirit of legislative
developments. While this review is underway in 2018, the remuneration framework will remain unchanged and be consistent
with the 2017 structures outlined in this Report.
We are also committed to implementing fully the recommendations of the Sedgwick report, which we are addressing in a
phased manner over the next three years. To date we have made significant progress on implementing around three quarters
of the recommendations, with good progress made on implementation of the remaining recommendations as we develop
appropriate support systems, frameworks and metrics. For example, in November 2016 we removed all product-related
incentives from around 2,000 tellers in the Westpac branch network.
2017 Remuneration outcomes – the link to Group performance
Each year the Board assesses a number of factors when determining remuneration outcomes. In addition to the financial
results included in Short-term Incentive (STI) balanced scoreboards, the Committee assesses other elements of performance
such as the quality of the results, key performance drivers, meeting customer needs, the risk and operating environment and
effectiveness of implementation of strategic initiatives to determine if the scoreboard outcomes adequately reflect actual
performance and returns to shareholders.
In what continues to be a challenging and competitive business environment, the Group’s financial performance was sound.
There was moderate growth in cash earnings and earnings per share, with marginal declines in return on equity and economic
profit, as capital and funding positions were strengthened further to position the Group to meet APRA’s unquestionably strong
benchmark. Significant improvements were achieved in net promoter scores (NPS) for customers, with Westpac being rated
with the highest overall NPS among major Australian banks for the first time in September 2017; employee engagement scores
also increased significantly, with outcomes achieved above the high performing global norm. This year we also retained our
position as the most sustainable bank globally in the 2017 Dow Jones Sustainability Indices for the fourth year running.
STI outcomes
It is against these outcomes that the short and long-term incentives were determined. STI outcomes during the year for the
CEO and the Group Executive team averaged 109% of target, up by an average of 14% on last year, and were within a range
of 96% to 116%. Different incentive outcomes across the Group Executive team reflect the performance of each division and
the quality of the performance delivered by the accountable executive.
Long-term Incentive (LTI) outcomes
In 2017, the 2014 LTI reached its test date. As the minimum performance vesting thresholds were not met, none of the 2014
LTI will vest.
More specifically:
Westpac’s LTI plan Total Shareholder Return (TSR) over the last three years was 11.791%, which was below the 50th
percentile vesting threshold, so none of the 2014 TSR hurdled rights vested. This is the third consecutive year where the
TSR hurdle has not been met; and
Westpac’s Cash Earnings per Share (EPS) growth over the last three years was also below the vesting threshold of 15.8%
(5.0% compound annual growth), so none of the 2014 EPS hurdled rights vested.
Directors’ report
2017 Westpac Group Annual Report 41
Changes to Key Management Personnel in 2017
The appointment effective 1 October 2016 of Rebecca Lim as the Group General Counsel & Chief Compliance Officer
1
and
Gary Thursby as Group Executive, Strategy & Enterprise Services was advised in last year’s Report, and their remuneration
details for the full 2017 period have been disclosed.
Philip Coffey retired during the year, after 21 years with Westpac.
This year we have made some minor changes to the way that we have presented the information in our Report, with the aim of
improving its format and layout.
We welcome your feedback as we continue to improve the disclosure of our remuneration policies, practices and outcomes.
Craig Dunn
Chairman – Board Remuneration Committee
1
Rebecca Lim’s title was amended to Group Executive, Compliance, Legal & Secretariat effective 2 October 2017.
1
42 2017 Westpac Group Annual Report
Topics covered in this Report
Section 1
List of 2017 Key Management Personnel
Section 2
Summary of 2017 CEO and Group Executive remuneration strategy and framework
Section 3
Summary of 2017 remuneration outcomes including:
remuneration paid and vested;
equity awarded;
LTI and STI outcomes; and
further details on the link to Group performance
Section 4
Further detail on 2017 executive remuneration structure
Section 5
Remuneration governance
Section 6
Non-executive Director remuneration structure
Section 7
Statutory remuneration disclosures including:
Non-executive Director remuneration;
CEO and Group Executive remuneration; and
additional statutory disclosures
Note: All references to Return on Equity (ROE) in this remuneration report are on a cash ROE basis. Refer to the
Glossary of abbreviations and defined terms for more detail.
Directors’ report
2017 Westpac Group Annual Report 43
1. Key Management Personnel remuneration disclosed in this Report
The remuneration of Key Management Personnel (KMP) for the Group is disclosed in this Report. In 2017, KMP comprised
Non-executive Directors, the CEO and Group Executives who reported to the CEO.
CEO and Group Executives
Name Position Term as KMP
Managing Director & Chief Executive Officer
Brian Hartzer Managing Director & Chief Executive Officer Full Year
Current Group Executives
Lyn Cobley Chief Executive, Westpac Institutional Bank Full Year
Brad Cooper Chief Executive Officer, BT Financial Group Full Year
Dave Curran Chief Information Officer Full Year
George Frazis Chief Executive, Consumer Bank Full Year
Alexandra Holcomb Chief Risk Officer Full Year
Peter King Chief Financial Officer Full Year
Rebecca Lim Group General Counsel & Chief Compliance Officer Commenced 1 October 2016
David Lindberg Chief Executive, Business Bank Full Year
David McLean Chief Executive Officer, Westpac New Zealand Limited Full Year
Christine Parker Group Executive, Human Resources, Corporate Affairs & Sustainability Full Year
Gary Thursby Group Executive, Strategy & Enterprise Services Commenced 1 October 2016
Former Group Executive
Philip Coffey Deputy Chief Executive Officer Ceased role 31 May 2017
Non-executive Directors
Name Position Term as KMP
Current Non-executive Directors
Lindsay Maxsted Chairman Full Year
Nerida Caesar Director Appointed 1 September 2017
Ewen Crouch Director Full Year
Alison Deans Director Full Year
Craig Dunn Director Full Year
Robert Elstone Director Full Year
Peter Hawkins Director Full Year
Peter Marriott Director Full Year
Former Non-executive Director
Elizabeth Bryan Director Retired 9 December 2016
1
44 2017 Westpac Group Annual Report
2. Summary of the 2017 CEO and Group Executive remuneration framework
Cash STI (50%)
Deferred STI Cash STI
Short-term Incentive (STI)
Westpac’s remuneration strategy is designed to attract and retain talented employees by rewarding them for achieving high
performance and delivering superior long term results for our customers and shareholders, while adhering to sound management
and governance principles and reflecting accountability.
The remuneration framework is designed to:
align remuneration with customer and shareholder interests;
support appropriate risk culture and employee conduct;
differentiate pay for behaviour and performance in line with our
strategy and vision;
Remuneration Principles
Fixed Remuneration
Long-term Incentive (LTI)
At Risk Remuneration (Variable Reward)
Fixed remuneration comprises:
cash salary;
salary sacrificed items; and
superannuation contributions.
STI delivered as:
50% cash; and
50% restricted ordinary shares or
share rights (for Group Executives
outside Australia
).
LTI comprises:
performance share rights which
may vest to varying degrees if
performance hurdles are achieved.
Total Reward Framework
Timeline of potential 2017 remuneration
Performance, governance and risk-adjustment overlay
All performance is assessed by the Board with reference to Group and divisional risk management policies. The Board retains the
ultimate discretion to adjust remuneration outcomes and/or unvested variable reward (including to zero). This applies to equity granted
under both the deferred STI and LTI plans if information comes to light that all or part of the award was not justified (malus).
FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20
Deferred STI (25%)
Deferred STI (25%)
STI
LTI
Fixed
remuneration
Base salary
LTI subject to Relative TSR performance (50%) – measured over 4 years
LTI subject to ROE performance (50%) – measured over 3 years
+1 year holding
All equity based
remuneration is
subject to:
reduction via malus (if
required); and
potential further
restrictions to ensure
minimum shareholder
requirements are met.
Rewards financial and non-financial
performance consistent with the
Group’s strategy over the short to
medium term. The deferred
component provides:
alignment with shareholders over the
medium term; and
at risk pay with malus provisions.
STI performance measures include
economic profit, earnings, risk,
strategic programs, customer
outcomes, people and sustainability.
The STI performance measures have
been selected to ensure focus in these
key areas.
Aligns executive accountability
and remuneration outcomes with
the delivery of sustained group
performance and shareholder
interests over the long term. The
LTI is also subject to adjustments
via malus provisions during the
performance period if required.
LTI performance measures (50:50):
TSR is a comparative measure of
Westpac’s performance relative to
peers; and
ROE aims to reward achievement
of returns above the cost of capital
while generating shareholder value.
34%
34%
32%
Target
pay mix
Purpose
Delivery
FY17
approach
Provided to attract and retain
executives, and takes into
account the size and complexity
of the role, individual
responsibilities, experience and
skills.
Fixed remuneration is set with
reference to relevant market
benchmarks in the financial
services industry.
provide market competitive and fair remuneration;
enable recruitment and retention of talented employees;
provide the ability to risk adjust remuneration; and
be simple, flexible and transparent.
Date paid
Date earned
Date granted Vesting date
Directors’ report
2017 Westpac Group Annual Report 45
3. Summary of remuneration outcomes
Executive KMP remuneration – paid and vested in 2017
1
3.1.
The following table shows the actual remuneration paid or vested to each executive KMP in 2017 compared to 2016
(unaudited) and includes:
fixed remuneration earned during the year;
cash STI awarded and paid in respect of the 2017 and 2016 performance years;
deferred STI amounts awarded in prior years that vested at the end of 2017 and 2016 respectively; and
LTI originally granted in 2014 and 2013 that vested or was forfeited at the end of 2017 and 2016 respectively.
This table shows actual remuneration paid, vested or forfeited while Section 7 represents outcomes prepared in accordance
with Australian Accounting Standards (AAS).
Fixed
Remuneration
Cash STI
awarded
and paid
Prior year
Deferred STI
vested
Prior year LTI
vested
2
Total realised
remuneration
Prior year LTI
forfeited
2
Name
$ $ $ $ $ $
Managing Director & Chief Executive Officer
Brian Hartzer
2017 2,686,000 1,490,730 1,280,114 -
5,456,844
3,046,592
2016 2,686,000 1,302,710 949,349 -
4,938,059
2,610,944
Current Group Executives
Lyn Cobley, Chief Executive, Westpac Institutional Bank
2017 1,122,000 640,000 244,864 -
2,006,864
-
2016 1,122,000 492,500 - -
1,614,500
-
Brad Cooper, Chief Executive Officer, BT Financial Group
2017 1,102,517 792,500 779,625 -
2,674,642
2,206,129
2016 1,102,517 735,000 733,887 -
2,571,404
1,350,495
Dave Curran, Chief Information Officer
2017 952,000 552,500 510,291 -
2,014,791
-
2016 952,000 467,500 258,810 -
1,678,310
-
George Frazis, Chief Executive, Consumer Bank
2017 1,150,000 872,500 876,225 -
2,898,725
1,155,565
2016 1,150,000 815,000 798,746 -
2,763,746
990,344
Alexandra Holcomb, Chief Risk Officer
2017 1,003,000 532,500 498,536 -
2,034,036
772,487
2016 1,003,000 492,500 400,492 -
1,895,992
450,134
Peter King, Chief Financial Officer
2017 1,088,000 615,000 536,202 -
2,239,202
1,132,480
2016 1,088,000 545,000 410,367 -
2,043,367
270,075
Rebecca Lim, Group General Counsel & Chief Compliance Officer
2017 750,000 412,500 248,227 -
1,410,727
388,674
2016 ---------------------------------------------------------------------Not a KMP in 2016-----------------------------------------------------------------------
David Lindberg, Chief Executive, Business Bank
2017 952,000 532,500 419,808 -
1,904,308
709,083
2016 901,000 477,500 314,033 -
1,692,533
405,142
David McLean, Chief Executive Officer, Westpac New Zealand Limited
2017 864,889 412,570 430,410 -
1,707,869
-
2016 854,565 363,050 285,422 -
1,503,037
-
1
46 2017 Westpac Group Annual Report
Fixed
Remuneration
Cash STI
awarded
and paid
Prior year
Deferred STI
vested
Prior year LTI
vested
2
Total realised
remuneration
Prior year LTI
forfeited
2
Name
$ $ $ $ $ $
Current Group Executives (cont.)
Christine Parker, Group Executive, Human Resources, Corporate Affairs & Sustainability
2017 850,000 517,500 481,816 -
1,849,316
1,365,665
2016 850,000 450,000 457,952 -
1,757,952
630,225
Gary Thursby, Group Executive, Strategy & Enterprise Services
2017 840,000 485,000 371,764 -
1,696,764
409,680
2016 ---------------------------------------------------------------------Not a KMP in 2016-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Former Group Executive
Philip Coffey, Deputy Chief Executive Officer
3
2017 908,741 457,500 669,828 -
2,036,069
2,237,655
2016 1,363,112 597,500 694,327 -
2,654,939
1,530,554
We have adopted a new approach for this table regarding equity disclosures, where we show equity that vests at the end of the performance year as
1
being part of the remuneration for that performance year (i.e. the 1 October 2017 vesting of deferred STI and LTI is one day after the completion of
the 2017 performance year and is shown as vested or forfeited against 2017 in the table below). This is different from the approach adopted in prior
years, where equity was disclosed as being part of remuneration in the year in which it vested or was forfeited.
The value shown is calculated by multiplying the number of equity instruments by the closing share price on the date of vesting or forfeiture.
2
See Section 1 for details.
3
Summary of Group LTI vesting outcomes
The vesting outcomes for LTI awards to the CEO (CEO LTI Plan) and Group Executives (Westpac LTI Plan) that reached the
completion of the performance period in 2017 and 2016 appear below:
Performance
measure
Performance
start date
Test date
Performance range
Outcome
%
Vested
%
Lapsed
Threshold Maximum
2014
LTI
grant
TSR
(50% of award)
1 October 2014
1 October
2017
50
th
percentile
75
th
percentile
20
th
percentile
0% 100%
EPS
(50% of award)
1 October 2014
1 October
2017
5.0% CAGR 7.0% CAGR
(0.8%)
CAGR
0% 100%
2013
LTI
grant
TSR
(50% of award)
1 October 2013
1 October
2016
50
th
percentile
75
th
percentile
20
th
percentile
0% 100%
EPS
(50% of award)
1 October 2013
1 October
2016
4.0% CAGR 6.0% CAGR
1.10%
CAGR
0% 100%
Other equity that vested during 2017
Lyn Cobley had 16,696 restricted shares which vested in July 2017 which were allocated in respect of equity forfeited from her
previous employer on joining Westpac.
Directors’ report
2017 Westpac Group Annual Report 47
Executive KMP remuneration – equity awarded in 2017 3.2.
The following table shows the fair value of equity awarded in 2017 and 2016 (unaudited) which is due to vest in future years,
subject to performance hurdles, tenure and malus conditions as applicable including:
deferred STI awards, being restricted shares valued as 50% of the STI allocated in the year divided by the 5 day volume
weighted average price (VWAP)
1
to date of grant; and
LTI awards, showing fair value of share rights granted in the year, where fair value is 40% of face value at date of grant for
the 2017 award, and 41.5%
2
of face value at the date of grant for the 2016 award. LTI share rights are subject to
performance conditions – see Section 4.3 for more detail.
The final value of equity that vests will depend on the proportion of shares or share rights that vest and the share price at the
time of vesting. The values differ from those in Section 7 which represent outcomes prepared in accordance with AAS.
This table can be read in conjunction with table 7.3 which shows the number of securities granted in 2017.
Deferred STI LTI (Fair value)
Name
$ $
Managing Director & Chief Executive Officer
Brian Hartzer
3
2017 1,490,730 2,528,000
2016 1,302,710 2,528,000
Group Executives
Lyn Cobley 2017 640,000 1,056,000
Chief Executive, Westpac Institutional Bank 2016 492,500 1,056,000
Brad Cooper 2017 792,500 1,050,000
Chief Executive Officer, BT Financial Group 2016 735,000 1,050,000
Dave Curran 2017 552,500 896,000
Chief Information Officer 2016 467,500 896,000
George Frazis 2017 872,500 1,000,000
Chief Executive, Consumer Bank 2016 815,000 1,000,000
Alexandra Holcomb 2017 532,500 944,000
Chief Risk Officer 2016 492,500 944,000
Peter King 2017 615,000 1,024,000
Chief Financial Officer 2016 545,000 1,024,000
Rebecca Lim 2017 412,500 700,000
Group General Counsel & Chief Compliance Officer 2016 ----------------- Not a KMP in 2016 --------------
David Lindberg 2017 532,500 912,000
Chief Executive, Business Bank 2016 477,500 848,000
David McLean 2017 412,570 810,138
Chief Executive Officer, Westpac New Zealand Limited 2016 363,050 804,296
Christine Parker 2017 517,500 750,000
Group Executive, Human Resources, Corporate Affairs & Sustainability 2016 450,000 750,000
Gary Thursby 2017 485,000 700,000
Group Executive, Strategy & Enterprise Services 2016 ----------------- Not a KMP in 2016 --------------
Former Group Executive
Philip Coffey
4
2017 457,500 1,280,000
Deputy Chief Executive Officer 2016 597,500 1,280,000
The 2017 award 5 day VWAP was $29.87, and the 2016 award 5 day VWAP was $29.87.
1
The fair value of 2016 TSR and EPS rights was 40% and 43% respectively.
2
The 2016 LTI opportunity for Brian Hartzer does not include the part year award for 2015 following his appointment as CEO that was awarded at the
3
same time as the 2016 LTI award.
See Section 1 for details.
4
1
48 2017 Westpac Group Annual Report
Summary of 2017 STI outcomes - How Group performance impacted CEO and Group Executive STI outcomes 3.3.
STI scoreboard targets provide the basis of short term variable reward and communicate the areas of focus for the year, which
includes the management of risk and demonstrating behaviours which are aligned to the Group values.
Application of discretion
The Board and the Remuneration Committee recognise that the scoreboard approach, while embracing a number of
complementary performance objectives, may not always enable a complete assessment of overall performance. The Board and
Remuneration Committee may therefore make discretionary adjustments, positive and negative, to the scoreboard outcomes
for the CEO and Group Executives. The Board and Remuneration Committee use the following criteria to apply discretionary
adjustments:
matters not known or not relevant at the beginning of the financial year, which are relevant to the under or over
performance of the CEO and Group Executives during the financial year;
the degree of stretch implicit in the scoreboard measures and targets themselves and the context in which the targets were
set;
whether the operating environment during the financial year has been materially better or worse than forecast;
comparison with the performance of the Group’s principal competitors;
any relevant positive or negative risk management or reputational issue that impacts the Group;
the quality of the financial result including its composition and sustainability;
whether there have been major positive or negative aspects regarding the quality of leadership and/or behaviours
consistent with our values; and
any other relevant under or over performance or other matter not captured.
The process ensures that financial measures such as economic profit are adjusted for non-operating items which impact the
current year process such as write-offs, accounting standard changes or one-off transactions (where appropriate) to ensure
that employees are neither advantaged nor disadvantaged when determining the incentive outcome. Adjustments are
considered on a multi-year basis where appropriate e.g. where a material adjustment impacts future earnings.
Group balanced scoreboard – CEO performance objectives
The structure of the Group balanced scoreboard (which forms the CEO scoreboard), performance measures, weightings,
assessment and the resulting STI outcomes are detailed in the following tables. The Group balanced scoreboard is also used in
part for the Group Executive STI outcomes, in combination with individual scoreboard measures which contribute to
determining the overall Group outcome.
The STI outcomes for individual executives have been determined using both quantitative and qualitative inputs including: the
overall Group performance relative to the external competitive environment, individual performance against stretching targets,
and judgement of individual’s capability and contribution to the Group relative to peer executives including demonstrated
leadership behaviours.
Directors’ report
2017 Westpac Group Annual Report 49
Group balanced scoreboard – CEO performance objectives (cont.)
Measure Weighting Assessment Considerations
Performance disciplines
Economic profit
Delivering
underlying returns
that create value
for shareholders
30%
Delivered economic profit of $3,774 million with ROE at 13.8%
within the 13-14% range we are seeking to achieve. Cash
earnings growth of 3% was offset by a 5% increase in capital
charge as we boosted capital levels in preparation for APRA
‘unquestionably strong’ capital requirements.
The Group prioritised return over growth, and capital
requirements were managed actively with credit risk weighted
assets down 3%.
Core earnings
growth
Delivering
consistent and
sustainable
growth in core
earnings
10% Increased 1%.
Revenues grew 2% supported by a 5% lending growth and 4%
deposit growth partly offset by 4bps margin compression.
Expenses rose just below 2% with productivity largely offsetting
operating costs, with the increase due to investment and higher
regulatory and compliance costs.
Capital
management
Providing a
strong, stable and
sustainable capital
base on which to
grow the business
10%
Capital and liquidity positions are well placed to meet new
regulatory requirements.
Common equity tier 1 ratio of 10.6% was over a full percentage
point higher over the year. Ended the year above the
‘unquestionably strong’ capital requirement set by APRA which
does not come into effect until 2020.
The Group is well placed for the introduction of the Net Stable
Funding Ratio from 1 January 2018, with the
30 September 2017 ratio at 109%.
Adherence to
Group Risk
Appetite
Statement
Ensuring we
operate within
accepted risk
tolerances
10%
The external risk, regulatory and compliance environment
continues to be increasingly complex and challenging. Overall
we have remained within the Group Risk Appetite.
Financial risk classes have been managed well including
capital, funding and credit risk. We have continued to tighten
underwriting standards in the residential and commercial
property portfolios.
Improvements have been made to the control environment
across fraud, financial crime and conduct risk. Responsible
lending, financial advice and sales practices have been a key
focus, with management accelerating the pace of customer
remediation programs. We have also made provisions for
customer refunds and payments where we’ve identified
instances where we need to take action so that our customers
are not at a disadvantage from certain past practices. Ongoing
programs of work are underway to address and enhance
management of system and data related risks.
Driving strategic change
Service
revolution
Putting customers
at the centre of
everything we do
10%
Finished the year as No 1 in the Australian ranking for both
consumer and business Net Promoter Score (Roy Morgan);
with Westpac finishing the year ranked No 2 for Customer
Satisfaction in the DBM survey.
Complaints reduced by 18%.
Continued to roll out multiple technology innovations to
customers, including Panorama (our wealth management
platform), e-conveyancing, Corporate Lending portal and faster
on-boarding, Collections web portal, LOLA (our Live Online
Lending Application), and numerous feature and useability
enhancements for mobile banking across all brands.
TARGETMAX
TARGETMAX
TARGETMAX
TARGETMAX
TARGETMAX
1
50 2017 Westpac Group Annual Report
Measure Weighting Assessment Considerations
Driving strategic change (cont.)
Service
revolution (cont.)
Continued to receive external recognition with some of the
awards won this year being: Retail Financial Institution of the
year, Best Private Bank in Australia, Best use of technology in
Private Banking/Wealth Management, and Best Digital Bank
(NZ).
Building growth
highways
Securing future
growth in earnings
10%
Grew ahead of expectations on deposits and SME lending and
in target segments of health and professional services.
In Wealth maintained a market share of #1 on all retail
platforms with positive net flows in funds under administration.
Digital
transformation
Delivering
solutions that
anticipate the
needs and
expectations of
our customers
10%
Delivered $262 million in productivity savings, through digitising
activities and transactions, reducing manual activity and
increasing eStatements.
Good progress on a number of major investments - Customer
Service Hub, launched a Big Data platform and installed a new
call centre platform. Major milestones included implementation
of the Oracle Banking platform and Group Customer Master
within the Westpac Technology environment.
All programs on track, delivering committed milestones and
outcomes.
Continued our focus on using technology to drive
transformation. We have used process automation and
simplification initiatives across ~500 processes and the
management of ~32 million customer activities annually.
Upgraded our Cybersecurity Coordination Centre (further
improving our ability to detect and respond to global threats
24x7).
Installed new call centre infrastructure that will materially
improve the experience of calling Westpac as well as providing
the foundation for a range of new customer service initiatives.
People
People and
sustainability
Providing an
environment that
encourages our
employees to be
the best they can
be and drives the
right behaviours
10%
We were awarded the Dow Jones Sustainability Index’s most
sustainable bank for 4th year in a row, with our highest score
ever achieved of 94 out of 100 points.
Achieved our target of 50% of women in leadership roles.
Group employee engagement was 79%, 2% above the Global
High Performing Norm, with employee pride in the organisation
increasing 11 points to 91%.
Strengthened our incident management and whistleblowing
processes to help our employees ‘feel safe to speak up’ (latest
employee survey result being 80% and above the Global High
Performing Norm of 79%).
Our Health, Safety and Wellbeing metrics continue to be market
leading with Lost Time Injury Frequency rates of 0.65 relative to
a target of 0.75 and our same day incident reporting exceeding
90%.
CEO STI outcome for 2017
The CEO outcome for 2017 was determined by the Board with reference to the Group balanced scoreboard outcome and the
principles of discretion detailed overleaf.
Name and position title Target STI
STI outcome
% of target
STI outcome
% of max
Actual Cash
STI
(50%)
Actual Deferred
STI
(50%)
Brian Hartzer
$2,686,000 111% 74% $1,490,730 $1,490,730
Managing Director & Chief Executive Officer
TARGETMAX
TARGETMAX
TARGETMAX
Directors’ report
2017 Westpac Group Annual Report 51
Individual Group Executive STI outcomes for 2017
Name and position title Target STI
STI outcome %
of target
STI outcome
% of max
Actual Cash
STI
(50%)
Actual
Deferred STI
(50%)
Current Group Executives
Lyn Cobley
$1,122,000 114% 76% $640,000 $640,000
Chief Executive, Westpac Institutional Bank
Brad Cooper
$1,600,000 99% 66% $792,500 $792,500
Chief Executive Officer, BT Financial Group
Dave Curran
$952,000 116% 77% $552,500 $552,500
Chief Information Officer
George Frazis
$1,600,000 109% 73% $872,500 $872,500
Chief Executive, Consumer Bank
Alexandra Holcomb
$1,003,000 106% 71% $532,500 $532,500
Chief Risk Officer
Peter King
$1,088,000 113% 75% $615,000 $615,000
Chief Financial Officer
Rebecca Lim
$750,000 110% 73% $412,500 $412,500
Group General Counsel & Chief Compliance
Officer
David Lindberg
$969,000 110% 73% $532,500 $532,500
Chief Executive, Business Bank
David McLean
$860,772 96% 64% $412,570 $412,570
Chief Executive Officer, Westpac New
Zealand Limited
Christine Parker
$900,000 115% 77% $517,500 $517,500
Group Executive, Human Resources,
Corporate Affairs & Sustainability
Gary Thursby
$860,000 113% 75% $485,000 $485,000
Group Executive, Strategy & Enterprise
Services
Former Group Executive
Philip Coffey
1
$906,667 101% 67% $457,500 $457,500
Deputy Chief Executive Officer
See Section 1 for details.
1
Group financial performance – five year perspective 3.4.
The following table provides the Group’s economic profit, ROE, TSR, dividends per share, cash earnings per share and share
price performance each year from 2013 for the past five years including 2017 and the STI outcomes for the CEO over the same
period:
Years Ended 30 September
2017 2016 2015 2014 2013
CEO STI outcome (% target) 111% 97% 108% 127% 123%
Economic profit ($m) 3,774 3,774 4,418 4,491 4,068
ROE 13.77% 14.00% 15.80% 16.40% 15.90%
TSR – three years 11.79% 15.24% 62.30% 102.03% 66.09%
TSR – five years 81.32% 100.72% 92.78% 103.74% 90.91%
Dividends per Westpac share (cents)
1
188 188 187 182 174
Cash earnings per Westpac share
2
$2.40 $2.35 $2.48 $2.45 $2.28
Share price – high $35.39 $33.74 $40.07 $35.99 $34.79
Share price – low $28.92 $27.57 $29.10 $30.00 $24.23
Share price – close $31.92 $29.51 $29.70 $32.14 $32.73
Does not include $0.20 special dividend determined in 2013.
1
Cash earnings are not prepared in accordance with AAS and have not been subject to audit.
2
1
52 2017 Westpac Group Annual Report
4. Further detail on 2017 executive remuneration structure
Fixed remuneration 4.1.
Fixed remuneration takes into account the size and complexity of the role, individual responsibilities, experience and skills.
Fixed remuneration is set based on relevant market benchmarks within the financial services industry.
Short-term incentive 4.2.
STI provides the opportunity for participants to earn cash and deferred equity incentives where specific outcomes have been
achieved in the financial year. The STI outcomes for the CEO and each Group Executive are assessed using a balanced
scoreboard, combining both annual financial and non-financial objectives which support the Group’s strategy.
2017 STI Plan
Plan structure 50% cash, 50% deferred equity in the form of restricted ordinary shares (or share rights for Group
Executives based outside of Australia).
The equity portion of the STI award vests over the following schedule: 50% at the end of year 1, and 50% at
the end of year 2.
Target
opportunity
The CEO’s STI target for 2017 was $2,686,000, unchanged from 2016.
STI targets for the CEO and Group Executives are set by the Remuneration Committee and approved by the
Board at the beginning of each performance year, based on a range of factors including market
competitiveness and the nature of each role. The STI targets for the 2017 performance year did not increase
for those Group Executives whose fixed remuneration was unchanged in 2017.
Maximum
opportunity
The maximum STI opportunity is 150% of target (the minimum opportunity being nil).
Performance
conditions
Performance is measured against risk-adjusted financial targets and non-financial targets which support the
Group’s strategy. Performance measures are based on performance at Group, divisional and individual
level. The deferred STI awards recognise past performance and are not subject to further performance
hurdles (other than continued service) and receive dividends over the vesting period.
See Section 3.3 for the Group balanced scoreboard.
Assessment of
performance
outcomes
STI outcomes are subject to both a quantitative and qualitative assessment, including a risk management
overlay, which is embedded in the scoreboard measurement process. The Board has the capacity to adjust
STI outcomes (and reduce STI outcomes to zero if appropriate) in the assessment process.
Long-term incentive 4.3.
The LTI is designed to align the remuneration of executives to the long-term performance of the Group and the interests of
shareholders. The amount of the award takes into account market benchmarks, individual performance over time, succession
potential and key skills.
LTI structure 2017 (awarded at the beginning of the 2017 performance year)
CEO LTI Plan and Westpac LTI Plan
Equity
instrument
Performance share rights - One share right entitles the holder to one ordinary share at the time of vesting at
a nil exercise cost. Share rights do not attract the payment of dividends.
LTI award
opportunity
The CEO was granted an LTI award of $2,528,000 (at fair value) in the form of share rights for 2017 under
the CEO LTI Plan.
At the beginning of each year, the Board, advised by the Remuneration Committee, sets the dollar value of
the LTI award target for the CEO and each Group Executive.
Determining
the number of
securities
The number of share rights each individual receives is determined by dividing the dollar value of the LTI
award by the fair value of the share rights at the beginning of the performance assessment period
(performance period).
The fair value of share rights is determined by an independent valuer taking as a starting point the market
price of Westpac shares at grant and using a Monte Carlo simulation pricing model, applying assumptions
based on expected life, volatility, risk-free interest rate and dividend yield associated with the securities and
the risk of forfeiture attributed to each performance hurdle. The Remuneration Committee caps the valuation
at a maximum discount of 60% of the relevant share price. The value of a TSR hurdled share right may be
different to an ROE hurdled share right.
Directors’ report
2017 Westpac Group Annual Report 53
CEO LTI Plan and Westpac LTI Plan
Performance
hurdles
2017 LTI (Awarded in December 2016)
TSR
50% of the allocation
ROE
50% of the allocation
The TSR performance hurdle measures Westpac’s
TSR against a composite TSR index over the four
year performance period, providing an arms-length
assessment of our comparative performance against
peers.
At the end of the performance period, TSR
performance of each of the index companies will be
multiplied by its index TSR weighting, and the total of
the 10 scores will comprise the composite index
performance measure.
Performance levels required for vesting of TSR share
rights are detailed in the table below:
TSR performance
(2017 to 2020 inclusive)
% vesting
At or exceeding the index
growth by 21.55
1
100%
Between meeting index and
exceeding the index growth
by 21.55
Straight line
vesting
Equal to index 50%
Below index 0%
1
21.55 (5% average compound annual growth rate)
The companies in the 2017 peer group for the
Westpac LTI Plan and their relative weightings are:
For the 2017 grant, the TSR share rights will be
tested against the performance hurdle on 30
September 2020.
This hurdle aims to reward achievement of returns
comfortably above the Group’s cost of capital while
generating shareholder value and further improving
how efficiently the Group uses its limited capital
resources within the Group’s risk appetite.
The ROE performance hurdle measures the
average cash return on average ordinary equity
over the three year performance period.
ROE rights which satisfy the ROE hurdle and qualify
for vesting at the completion of the three year
performance period will have a one year holding
lock applied and will vest at the completion of the
four year term from the commencement date. A
description of the process used to determine cash
earnings is provided at Note 2 to the financial
statements.
Performance levels required for vesting of ROE
share rights are detailed in the table below:
ROE performance
(2017 to 2019 inclusive)
% vesting
At or above 14.5% 100%
Between 13.5% and 14.5%
Straight line
vesting
Equal to 13.5% 50%
Below 13.5% 0%
For the 2017 grant, the share rights will be tested
against the performance hurdles on
30 September 2019. Share rights that qualify for
vesting will have a one year holding lock applied
and will vest on 30 September 2020.
Who
measures the
performance
hurdle
outcomes?
To ensure objectivity and external validation, TSR
results are calculated by an independent external
consultant and are provided to the Board or its
delegate to review and determine vesting outcomes.
Under the relevant plan rules, the Board may
exercise discretion if in all prevailing circumstances
Directors think it is appropriate to do so when
determining the ultimate vesting outcome.
The ROE outcome will be determined by the Board
based on the ROE disclosed in our results at the
completion of the performance period. Under the
relevant plan rules, the Board may exercise
discretion if in all prevailing circumstances Directors
think it is appropriate to do so when determining the
ultimate vesting outcome.
No re-testing There has been no re-testing on LTI awards made since 2011. No award currently on foot is subject to re-
testing. Accordingly, securities that have not vested after the measurement period lapse immediately.
CompanyTSR weighting
ANZ Banking Group16.67%
Commonwealth Bank16.67%
National Australia Bank16.67%
AMP7.14%
Bank of Queensland7.14%
Bendigo and Adelaide Bank7.14%
Challenger7.14%
Macquarie Group7.14%
Perpetual7.14%
Suncorp Group7.14%
1
54 2017 Westpac Group Annual Report
CEO LTI Plan and Westpac LTI Plan
Early vesting
is possible in
limited cases
For awards made since 1 October 2009, unvested securities may vest before a test date if the executive is
no longer employed by the Group due to death or disability. In general, any such vesting is not subject to
performance hurdles being met.
Treatment of
securities
The Board has discretion in relation to performance share rights where the CEO or a Group Executive
resigns or retires or otherwise leaves the Group before vesting occurs. This discretion enables the Board to
vest the relevant securities or leave them on foot for the remainder of the performance period. In exercising
its discretion, the Board will take into account all relevant circumstances including those surrounding the
departure in question. The Board may also adjust the number of performance share rights downwards, or to
zero (in which case they will lapse) where the circumstances of the departure warrant, or to respond to
misconduct resulting in significant financial and/or reputational impact to Westpac.
Where a holder acts fraudulently or dishonestly, or is in material breach of their obligations under the
relevant equity plan, unexercised performance share rights (whether vested or unvested) will lapse unless
the Board determines otherwise.
Details for other LTI awards currently on foot (CEO and Group Executives) can be found in the following Reports:
2015 LTI award, vesting on 30 September 2018 – 50% of award subject to ranked TSR performance against a peer group,
and 50% of the award subject to cash EPS CAGR performance condition. Refer to the 2015 Annual Report; and
2016 LTI award, vesting on 30 September 2019 – 50% of award subject to TSR performance against a weighted
composite index of comparator companies, and 50% of the award subject to cash EPS CAGR performance condition.
Refer to the 2016 Annual Report.
LTI structure 2018 (awarded at the beginning of 2018 performance year)
The LTI structure for the 2018 award will retain the same design features as the 2017 award.
The TSR hurdle, as detailed above, will remain unchanged in 2018.
The performance range for the ROE component of the 2018 LTI has been set at an average ROE of between 13.25% and
14.25%. The range is 25 basis points lower than the 2017 LTI ROE target as it reflects updated information on regulatory
capital requirements, and the likely prospects of a more competitive business environment and higher impairment charges. The
ROE target range also takes into account the Group’s risk appetite whilst incentivising the delivery of stretching performance
outcomes.
The Board retains ultimate discretion to ensure that vesting outcomes deliver alignment between performance and shareholder
outcomes.
Directors’ report
2017 Westpac Group Annual Report 55
Shareholding requirements and hedging policy 4.4.
To align further their interests with those of shareholders, the CEO and Group Executives are required to build and maintain a
substantial Westpac shareholding within five years of being appointed to their role.
Minimum shareholding requirement
CEO
Five times annual fixed remuneration ($13.43 million)
Group Executives
$1.2 million each
All Group Executives who have been in a Group Executive role for more than five years meet these shareholding requirements.
Executives that have been in Group Executive roles for less than five years are working towards, or have already satisfied,
these requirements.
Participants in the Group’s equity plans are forbidden from entering, either directly or indirectly, into hedging arrangements for
unvested securities in their STI and LTI equity awards. No financial products of any kind may be used to mitigate the risk
associated with these awards. Any attempt to hedge these securities makes them subject to forfeiture. These restrictions have
been in place for some time and satisfy the requirements of the Corporations Act which prohibit hedging of unvested securities.
Employment agreements
4.5.
The remuneration and other terms of employment for the CEO and Group Executives are formalised in their employment
agreements. Each of these employment agreements provides for the payment of fixed and performance-based remuneration,
employer superannuation contributions and other benefits such as death and disablement insurance cover.
The term and termination provisions of the employment agreements for the FY17 Executive KMP are summarised below:
Term Who Conditions
Duration of agreement
CEO and all Group Executives
Ongoing until notice given by either
party
Notice to be provided by the
executive or the Group to terminate
the employment agreement
CEO and Group Executives
(excluding Philip Coffey)
12 months
1
Philip Coffey 6 months
Termination payments to be made
on termination without cause
2
CEO and all Group Executives
Deferred STI and LTI awards vest
according to the applicable equity plan
rules
Termination for cause CEO and Group Executives
(excluding Brad Cooper and Philip
Coffey)
Immediately for misconduct
3 months’ notice for poor performance
Brad Cooper and Philip Coffey Immediately for misconduct
Contractual notice period for poor
performance
Post-employment restraints
CEO and all Group Executives 12 month non-solicitation restraint
Payment in lieu of notice may in certain circumstances be approved by the Board for some or all of the notice period.
1
The maximum liability for termination benefits for the CEO and other Executive KMP at 30 September 2017 was $13.4 million (2016: $13 million).
2
1
56 2017 Westpac Group Annual Report
5. Remuneration governance
The Group’s remuneration policy supports Westpac’s vision and strategy by:
requiring the design and management of remuneration to align with customer and shareholder interests;
supporting financial soundness; and
encouraging prudent risk management.
The role of the Board is to provide strategic guidance for the Group and effective oversight of management. As part of this role,
the Board has overall accountability for remuneration.
The Remuneration Committee assists the Board to fulfil its remuneration responsibilities to shareholders by monitoring the
remuneration policies and practices of the Group, external remuneration practices, market expectations and regulatory
requirements in Australia and internationally. The Committee’s purpose, responsibilities and duties are outlined in the Board
Remuneration Committee Charter which is available on the Group’s website. The Charter was last reviewed and amended in
March 2016.
The Group’s remuneration strategy, executive remuneration framework, policies and practices all reflect the sound risk
management that is fundamental to the way the Group operates, the law and high standards of governance. The performance
of each division is reviewed and measured with reference to how risk is managed and the results influence remuneration
outcomes for accountable employees.
In carrying out its duties, the Remuneration Committee can access risk and financial control personnel and engage external
advisors who are independent of management. The Chairman of the Board Risk & Compliance Committee is also a member of
the Remuneration Committee, and members of the Remuneration Committee are also members of the Board Risk &
Compliance Committee.
The executive Total Reward framework (outlined in Section 2 of this Report) specifically includes features to take account of
risk.
Members of the Remuneration Committee during 2017
All members of the Remuneration Committee are independent Non-executive Directors. During 2017, the members were:
Craig Dunn (Chairman from 9 December 2016);
Ewen Crouch (Chairman to 9 December 2016);
Elizabeth Bryan (retired on 9 December 2016); and
Robert Elstone.
Independent remuneration consultant
In 2017, the Board retained Guerdon Associates as its independent consultant to provide specialist information on executive
remuneration and other remuneration matters, the services being provided directly to the Remuneration Committee
independent of management. The Chairman of the Remuneration Committee oversees the engagement and costs of the
independent consultant.
Work undertaken by Guerdon Associates during 2017 included the provision of information relating to the benchmarking of
Non-executive Director, CEO and Group Executive remuneration. No remuneration recommendations, as prescribed under the
Corporations Act, were made by Guerdon Associates in 2017.
Approval of remuneration decisions
The Group follows a strict process of ‘two-up’ approval for all remuneration decisions. This means that remuneration is
approved by the next most senior person above the employee’s manager. This concept is also reflected in our requirement for
the Board, based on recommendations from the Remuneration Committee, to approve performance outcomes and
remuneration for:
the CEO and Group Executives; and
other executives who report directly to the CEO, other persons whose activities in the Board’s opinion affect the financial
soundness of the Group and any other person specified by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority.
Any significant remuneration arrangements that fall outside the Group Remuneration Policy are referred to the Remuneration
Committee for review and approval.
Directors’ report
2017 Westpac Group Annual Report 57
6. Non-executive Director remuneration
Structure and policy
6.1.
Remuneration policy
Westpac’s Non-executive Director remuneration strategy is designed to attract and retain experienced, qualified Board
members and remunerate them appropriately for their time and expertise.
Fees for Non-executive Directors are not related to the Group’s short-term results and Non-executive Directors do not receive
performance-based remuneration. Non-executive Director remuneration consists of the following components:
Remuneration Component Paid as Detail
Base fee
Cash
This fee is for service on the Westpac Banking Corporation Board.
The base fee for the Chairman covers all responsibilities, including all
Board Committees.
Committee fees
Cash
Additional fees are paid to other Non-executive Directors for chairing or
participating in Board Committees.
Employer superannuation
contributions
Superannuation
Reflects statutory superannuation contributions which are capped at the
superannuation maximum contributions base as prescribed under the
Superannuation Guarantee legislation.
Subsidiary Board and
Advisory Board fees
Cash
Fees are for service on Subsidiary Boards and Advisory Boards and are
paid by the relevant subsidiary.
Non-executive Director remuneration in 2017
Non-executive Director fee review – Effective 1 October 2016
The Board reviewed the Non-executive Director fee framework in late 2016. On the basis of market data provided by Guerdon
Associates, the Board approved an increase to the member fees for the Board Technology Committee recognising the
workload associated with these roles.
Changes to Board and Committee composition
The following changes were made to Board and Committee composition:
Elizabeth Bryan retired on 9 December 2016 following the 2016 Annual General Meeting;
Ewen Crouch was appointed Chairman of the Board Risk & Compliance Committee effective 9 December 2016 stepping
down as Chairman of the Board Remuneration Committee on the same date (remaining a member of that Committee);
Craig Dunn was appointed as Chairman of the Board Remuneration Committee and member of the Board Nominations
Committee effective 9 December 2016; and
Nerida Caesar was appointed as a Non-executive Director to the Westpac Board effective 1 September 2017 and
appointed to the Board Risk & Compliance and Board Technology Committees effective 28 September 2017.
Fee pool
At the 2008 Annual General Meeting, the current fee pool of $4.5 million per annum was approved by shareholders. For the
year ended 30 September 2017, $2.94 million (65%) of this fee pool was used. The fee pool is inclusive of employer
superannuation contributions.
1
58 2017 Westpac Group Annual Report
Fee framework
This section details the current Non-executive Director fee framework.
Base and Committee fees
The following table sets out the Board and standing Committee fees:
Annual Rate
Base Fee $
Chairman 810,000
Non-executive Directors 225,000
Committee Chairman Fees
Audit Committee 70,400
Risk and Compliance Committee 70,400
Remuneration Committee 63,800
Technology Committee 35,200
Committee Membership Fees
Audit Committee 32,000
Risk and Compliance Committee 32,000
Remuneration Committee 29,000
Technology Committee 20,000
Committee fees are not payable to the Chairman of the Board and members of the Nominations Committee.
Employer superannuation contributions
The Group pays superannuation contributions to Non-executive Directors of up to 9.5% of their fees. The contributions are
capped at the superannuation maximum compulsory contributions base prescribed under the Superannuation Guarantee
legislation.
Subsidiary Board and Advisory Board fees
During the reporting period, additional fees of $35,000 were paid to Peter Hawkins as a member of the Bank of Melbourne
Advisory Board.
Minimum shareholding
Non-executive Directors are required to build and maintain their individual holdings of Westpac ordinary shares to align their
interests with the long-term interests of shareholders. The Board Chair and each Non-executive Director are required to hold an
interest in shares in Westpac with a market value not less than the Board base fee within five years of appointment to the
Board. Details of Non-executive Directors’ Westpac (and related bodies corporate) shareholdings are set out in Section 7.4.
Directors’ report
2017 Westpac Group Annual Report 59
7. Statutory remuneration details
Details of Non-executive Director remuneration
7.1.
Details of Non-executive Director remuneration are set out in the table below:
Short-Term Benefits Post-Employment Benefits
Westpac Banking
Corporation Board
Fees
1
Subsidiary and
Advisory Board Fees Superannuation Total
Name $ $ $ $
Current Non-executive Directors
Lindsay Maxsted, Chairman
2017 810,000 - 19,734 829,734
2016 810,000 - 19,540 829,540
Nerida Caesar
2
2017 18,921 - 1,619 20,540
Ewen Crouch
2017 323,719 - 19,734 343,453
2016 320,800 - 19,540 340,340
Alison Deans
2017 277,000 - 19,734 296,734
2016 273,000 - 19,540 292,540
Craig Dunn
2017 314,221 - 19,734 333,955
2016 286,000 - 19,540 305,540
Robert Elstone
2017 318,000 - 19,734 337,734
2016 318,000 - 19,540 337,540
Peter Hawkins
2017 324,200 35,000 19,658 378,858
2016 324,200 35,000 19,465 378,665
Peter Marriott
2017 347,400 - 19,734 367,134
2016 343,400 - 19,540 362,940
Former Non-executive Director
Elizabeth Bryan
2
2017 62,214 - 3,709 65,923
2016 324,400 - 19,540 343,940
Total fees
2017 2,795,675 35,000 143,390 2,974,065
2016
3
2,999,800 35,000 156,245 3,191,045
Includes fee paid to the Chairman and members of Board Committees.
1
Refer to Section 1 of the Report for details.
2
The total fees for 2016 reflect the prior year remuneration for the 2016 reported Non-executive Directors.
3
1
60 2017 Westpac Group Annual Report
Remuneration details – CEO and Group Executives 7.2.
This section sets out details of remuneration for the CEO and Group Executives for the 2017 financial year, calculated in
accordance with AAS.
Short-Term Benefits
Post-
Employment
Benefits
Other
Long-
Term
Benefits Share-Based Payments
Fixed
Remu-
neration
1
STI (Cash)
2
Non-
Monetary
Benefits
3
Other
Short-Term
Benefits
4
Superann-
uation
Benefits
5
Long
Service
Leave
Restricted
Shares
6
Share
Rights
78
Total
9
Name $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
Managing Director & Chief Executive Officer
Brian Hartzer
2017 2,665,249 1,490,730 19,494 - 41,226 40,697 1,287,590 1,136,724 6,681,710
2016 2,774,879 1,302,710 21,349 - 36,522 40,722 1,128,139 1,447,696 6,752,017
Current Group Executives
Lyn Cobley, Chief Executive, Westpac Institutional Bank
2017 1,089,650 640,000 4,014 - 37,818 16,995 767,014 591,601 3,147,092
2016 1,097,409 492,500 1,850 - 27,480 17,005 977,182 307,514 2,920,940
Brad Cooper, Chief Executive Officer, BT Financial Group
2017 1,064,384 792,500 2,924 - 39,503 (41,160) 754,634 347,391 2,960,176
2016 1,060,435 735,000 4,089 - 36,727 16,730 831,388 800,145 3,484,514
Dave Curran, Chief Information Officer
2017 941,632 552,500 4,014 - 28,451 14,424 487,089 404,406 2,432,516
2016 914,905 467,500 4,089 - 25,921 14,424 428,244 461,898 2,316,981
George Frazis, Chief Executive, Consumer Bank
2017 1,127,559 872,500 4,014 - 40,509 17,419 842,782 401,563 3,306,346
2016 1,131,541 815,000 3,039 - 37,090 17,451 925,520 591,094 3,520,735
Alexandra Holcomb, Chief Risk Officer
2017 950,564 532,500 2,924 - 39,645 4,669 520,145 386,131 2,436,578
2016 949,671 492,500 3,039 - 36,936 16,199 587,415 566,909 2,652,669
Peter King, Chief Financial Officer
2017 1,047,360 615,000 4,014 - 34,421 16,485 537,796 405,875 2,660,951
2016 1,041,344 545,000 4,089 - 31,072 48,728 499,345 661,789 2,831,367
Rebecca Lim, Group General Counsel & Chief Compliance Officer
2017 756,722 412,500 3,512 - 28,201 45,641 425,776 206,069 1,878,421
David Lindberg, Chief Executive, Business Bank
2017 928,528 532,500 11,901 - 27,244 18,507 453,174 398,655 2,370,509
2016 880,296 477,500 17,070 - 23,103 15,069 403,624 464,140 2,280,802
David McLean, Chief Executive Officer, Westpac New Zealand Limited
2017 736,628 412,570 39,739 - 76,082 - 39 837,360 2,102,418
2016 760,848 363,050 33,753 - 76,093 - 14,322 932,957 2,181,023
Christine Parker, Group Executive, Human Resources, Corporate Affairs & Sustainability
2017 824,006 517,500 4,604 - 26,643 (3,479) 464,335 260,141 2,093,750
2016 849,556 450,000 4,650 - 24,279 (5,013) 518,374 558,680 2,400,526
Gary Thursby, Group Executive, Strategy & Enterprise Services
2017 820,262 485,000 2,924 - 29,819 12,642 372,119 225,354 1,948,120
Former Group Executive
Philip Coffey, Deputy Chief Executive Officer
10
2017 844,753 457,500 3,053 - 28,654 13,750 780,444 2,811,904 4,940,058
2016 1,289,796 597,500 4,105 - 41,497 20,678 766,988 913,187 3,633,751
Fixed remuneration is the total cost of salary, salary sacrificed benefits (including motor vehicles, parking, etc., and any associated fringe benefits tax
1
(FBT)) and an accrual for annual leave entitlements.
2017 STI figures reflect annual cash performance awards accrued but not yet paid in respect of the year ended 30 September 2017. STI awards are
2
paid in the December pay cycle.
Non-monetary benefits are determined on the basis of the cost to the Group (including associated FBT, where applicable) and include annual health
3
checks, provision of taxation advice, relocation costs, living away from home expenses and allowances.
Includes payments on cessation of employment or other contracted amounts.
4
The CEO and Group Executives are provided with life insurance cover under the Westpac Group Plan at no cost. Superannuation benefits have been
5
calculated consistent with AASB 119 Employee Benefits.
The value of restricted shares is amortised over the applicable vesting period and the amount shown is the amortisation relating to the 2017 reporting
6
year (and 2016 year as comparison). See footnote 10 for the treatment of Philip Coffey’s equity.
Directors’ report
2017 Westpac Group Annual Report 61
Equity-settled remuneration is based on the amortisation over the vesting period (normally three or four years) of the ‘fair value’ at grant date of
7
hurdled and unhurdled options and share rights that were granted during the four years ended 30 September 2017. Details of prior years’ grants have
been disclosed in previous Annual Reports. The value for David McLean includes 53% attributed to deferred STI. See footnote 10 for the treatment of
Philip Coffey’s equity.
The expensed value of the December 2015 LTI EPS hurdled rights has been reduced to 0% and the expensed value of the December 2016 LTI EPS
8
hurdled rights and 2017 LTI ROE hurdled rights have been reduced to 50%. This reflects the Board’s current assessment of the probability of the
threshold ROE (2017 grant) or EPS hurdles (2015 and 2016 grants) being met and share rights vesting over time. See footnote 10 for the treatment
of Philip Coffey’s equity.
The percentage of the total remuneration which is performance related (i.e. STI cash plus share-based payments) was: Brian Hartzer 59%,
9
Lyn Cobley 64%, Philip Coffey 82%, Brad Cooper 64%, Dave Curran 59%, George Frazis 64%, Alexandra Holcomb 59%, Peter King 59%,
Rebecca Lim 56%, David Lindberg 58%, David McLean 59%, Christine Parker 59% and Gary Thursby 56%. The percentage of total remuneration
delivered in the form of options (including share rights) was: Brian Hartzer 17%, Lyn Cobley 19%, Philip Coffey 57%, Brad Cooper 12%,
Dave Curran 17%, George Frazis 12%, Alexandra Holcomb 16%, Peter King 15%, Rebecca Lim 11%, David Lindberg 17%, David McLean 40%,
Christine Parker 12% and Gary Thursby 12%.
Refer Section 1 of the Report for details. The share based payment values for Philip Coffey reflect the accruals for all unvested equity granted for the
10
entire period up to the end of each performance period. For example, the 2017 LTI will include the accrual for four years until the vesting date in lieu
of a single year accrual value for 2017. While the full value is being accrued for all unvested equity held by Philip Coffey, the awards may or may not
vest subject to the relevant performance hurdles.
1
62 2017 Westpac Group Annual Report
Movement in equity-settled instruments during this year 7.3.
This table shows the details of movements during 2017 in the number and value of equity instruments for the CEO and Group
Executives under the relevant plans:
Name Type of Equity-Based Instrument
Number
Granted
1
Number
Vested
2
Number
Exercised
3
Value
Granted
4
$
Value
Exercised
5
$
Value
Forfeited or
Lapsed
5,6
$
Managing Director & Chief Executive Officer
Brian Hartzer CEO Performance share rights 211,548 - - 4,226,729 - -
Performance share rights - - - - - 2,610,944
Shares under the CEO Restricted
Share Plan
40,444 19,746 - 1,302,187 - -
Shares under Restricted Share Plan - 12,075 - - - -
Current Group Executives
Lyn Cobley Performance share rights 88,368 - - 1,693,573 - -
Shares under Restricted Share Plan 15,290 16,696 - 492,296 - -
Brad Cooper Performance share rights 87,866 - - 1,683,952 - 1,350,495
Shares under Restricted Share Plan 22,819 24,599 - 734,710 - -
Dave Curran Performance share rights 74,978 - - 1,436,953 - -
Shares under Restricted Share Plan 14,514 8,675 - 467,311 - -
George Frazis Performance share rights 83,682 - - 1,603,766 - 990,344
Shares under Restricted Share Plan 25,302 26,773 - 814,655 - -
Alexandra Holcomb Performance share rights 78,994 - - 1,513,920 - 450,134
Performance options - - 38,847 - 65,509 -
Shares under Restricted Share Plan 15,290 19,268 - 492,296 - -
Peter King Performance share rights 85,690 - - 1,642,249 - 270,075
Shares under Restricted Share Plan 16,920 13,755 - 544,778 - -
Rebecca Lim Performance share rights 58,576 - - 1,122,609 - 252,066
Shares under Restricted Share Plan 7,619 8,433 - 245,311 - -
David Lindberg Performance share rights 76,316 - - 1,462,596 - 405,142
Shares under Restricted Share Plan 14,824 11,849 - 477,292 - -
David McLean Performance share rights 67,094 - - 1,285,857 - -
Unhurdled share rights 12,332 14,623 - 356,629 - -
Shares under Restricted Share Plan - 1,327 - - - -
Christine Parker Performance share rights 62,760 - - 1,202,795 - 630,225
Shares under Restricted Share Plan 13,970 15,350 - 449,796 - -
Gary Thursby Performance share rights 58,576 - - 1,122,609 - 351,085
Shares under Restricted Share Plan 11,176 11,609 - 359,837 - -
Former Group Executive
Philip Coffey Performance share rights 107,112 - - 2,052,801 - 1,503,554
Shares under Restricted Share Plan 18,550 23,273 - 597,259 - -
No performance options were granted in 2017. Deferred STI in the form of restricted shares or unhurdled share rights (David McLean) are awarded in
1
December. David McLean’s unhurdled deferred STI share rights allocated in December 2016 were allocated at a fair value of $30.28 (rights vesting
on 1 October 2017) and $28.47 (rights vesting on 1 October 2018).
No hurdled share rights granted in 2013 vested in October 2016 as assessed against the TSR and EPS performance hurdles.
2
Vested options and share rights that were awarded prior to October 2009 can be exercised up to a maximum of 10 years from their commencement
3
date. Vested rights awarded between October 2009 and July 2015 are automatically exercised at vesting. Vested rights granted after July 2015 may
be exercised at will up to a maximum of 15 years from their commencement date. For each share right and each performance option exercised during
the year, the relevant executive received one fully paid Westpac ordinary share. The exercise price for share rights is nil.
Directors’ report
2017 Westpac Group Annual Report 63
For performance share rights, the value granted represents the number of securities granted multiplied by the fair value per instrument as set out in
4
the table in the sub-section titled ‘Fair value of LTI grants made during the year’ below. For restricted shares, the value granted represents the
number of ordinary shares granted multiplied by the five day VWAP of a Westpac ordinary share on the date the shares were granted. These values,
which represent the full value of the equity-based awards made to disclosed CEO and Group Executives in 2017, do not reconcile with the amount
shown in the table in Section 7.2 of this Report, which shows the amount amortised in the current year of equity awards over their vesting period. The
minimum total value of the grants for future financial years is nil and an estimate of the maximum possible total value in future financial years is the
fair value, as shown above.
The value of each option or share right exercised or lapsed is calculated based on the five day volume weighted average price of Westpac ordinary
5
shares on the ASX on the date of exercise (or lapse), less the relevant exercise price (if any). Where the exercise price is greater than the five day
VWAP of Westpac ordinary shares, the value has been calculated as nil.
Apart from equity instruments referred to in this section, no other equity instruments granted in prior years vested and none were forfeited during the
6
financial year.
Fair value of LTI grants made during the year
The table below provides a summary of the fair value of LTI awards granted to the CEO and Group Executives during 2017
calculated in accordance with AASB 2 (Share-based Payment) and is used for accounting purposes only. The LTI grants will
vest on satisfaction of performance and/or service conditions tested in future financial years.
Fair
Performance
Commencement Value
2
per
Equity Instrument Granted to Hurdle Grant Date Date
1
Test Date Expiry Instrument
CEO Long-Term
Brian Hartzer
TSR Index 9 December 2016 1 October 2016 1 October 2020 1 October 2031 $14.09
Incentive Plan ROE 9 December 2016 1 October 2016 1 October 2019 1 October 2031 $25.87
Westpac Long-Term
All Group
Executives
TSR Index 1 December 2016 1 October 2016 1 October 2020 1 October 2031 $13.33
Incentive Plan ROE 1 December 2016 1 October 2016 1 October 2019 1 October 2031 $25.00
The commencement date is the start of the performance period.
1
The fair values of share rights granted during the year included in the table above have been independently calculated at their respective grant dates
2
based on the requirements of AASB 2 (Share-based Payment). The fair value of rights with ROE hurdles has been assessed with reference to the
share price at grant date and a discount rate reflecting the expected dividend yield over their vesting periods which for the rights valued at $25.00 is
four years to the 1 October 2019 vesting date. For the purpose of allocating rights with ROE hurdles, the valuation also takes into account the
average ROE outcome using a Monte Carlo simulation model. The fair value of rights with hurdles based on TSR performance relative to a group of
comparator companies also takes into account the average TSR outcome determined using a Monte Carlo simulation pricing model.
Movement in equity-settled instruments during this year 7.4.
Equity holdings
The following table sets out details of relevant interests in Westpac ordinary shares held by Non-executive Directors (including
their related parties) during the year ended 30 September 2017
1
:
Name
Number Held at
Start of the Year
Other Changes
During the Year
Number Held at
End of the Year
Current Non-executive Directors
Lindsay Maxsted
19,550 1,217 20,767
Nerida Caesar
2
n/a - -
Ewen Crouch
3
40,245 19 40,264
Alison Deans
9,392 - 9,392
Craig Dunn
8,869 - 8,869
Robert Elstone
11,384 712 12,096
Peter Hawkins
4
15,880 - 15,880
Peter Marriott
20,870 - 20,870
Former Non-executive Director
Elizabeth Bryan
2
27,967 - n/a
None of these share interests include non-beneficially held shares.
1
The information relates to the period these individuals were Non-executive Directors. Refer Section 1 for details.
2
In addition to holdings of ordinary shares, Ewen Crouch and his related parties held interests in 250 Westpac Capital Notes 2 at year end.
3
In addition to holdings of ordinary shares, Peter Hawkins and his related parties held interests in 1,370 Convertible Preference Shares, 850 Westpac
4
Capital Notes 3 and 882 Westpac Capital Notes 4 at year end.
1
64 2017 Westpac Group Annual Report
Details of Westpac equity holdings of Executive Key Management Personnel 7.5.
The following table sets out details of Westpac equity held by the CEO and Group Executives (including their related parties)
for the year ended 30 September 2017
1
:
Name
Type of Equity-based
Instrument
Number
Held at
Start of
the Year
Number
Granted
During the
Year as
Remuneration
Received on
Exercise
and/or
Exercised
During the
Year
Number
Lapsed
During
the Year
Other
Changes
During
the Year
Number
Held at
End of the
Year
Number
Vested and
Exercisable
at End of
the Year
Managing Director & Chief Executive Officer
Brian Hartzer Ordinary shares 53,722 40,444 - - (16,739) 77,427 -
CEO Performance
share rights
323,615 211,548 - - - 535,163 -
Performance share rights 215,375 - - (85,828) - 129,547 -
Current Group Executives
Lyn Cobley Ordinary shares 56,360 15,290 - - - 71,650 -
Performance share rights 90,914 88,368 - - - 179,282 -
Brad Cooper Ordinary shares 83,973 22,819 - - - 106,792 -
Performance share rights 272,648 87,866 - (44,394) - 316,120 -
Dave Curran Ordinary shares 17,350 14,514 - - - 31,864 -
Performance share rights 135,898 74,978 - - - 210,876 -
George Frazis Ordinary shares 136,267 25,302 - - (90,000) 71,569 -
Performance share rights 207,708 83,682 - (32,555) - 258,835 -
Alexandra Holcomb
Ordinary shares 27,188 15,290 38,847 - (58,115) 23,210 -
Performance options 38,847 - (38,847) - - - -
Performance share rights 178,733 78,994 - (14,797) - 242,930 -
Peter King
Ordinary shares 61,323 16,920 - - - 78,243 -
Performance share rights 192,804 85,690 - (8,878) - 269,616 -
Rebecca Lim Ordinary shares 27,084 7,619 - - (8,433) 26,270 -
Performance share rights 51,228 58,576 - (8,286) - 101,518 -
David Lindberg Ordinary shares 41,202 14,824 - - (8,000) 48,026 -
Performance share rights 133,486 76,316 - (13,318) - 196,484 -
David McLean Ordinary shares 9,613 - - - - 9,613 -
Performance share rights 102,608 67,094 - - - 169,702 2,148
Unhurdled share rights 30,504 12,332 - - - 42,836 19,770
Christine Parker Ordinary shares 23,408 13,970 - - (15,350) 22,028 -
Performance share rights 177,182 62,760 - (20,717) - 219,225 -
Gary Thursby Ordinary shares 65,853 11,176 - - - 77,029 -
Performance share rights 65,601 58,576 - (11,541) - 112,636 -
Former Group Executive
Philip Coffey
2
Ordinary shares 350,253 18,550 - - (100,076) n/a -
Performance share rights 314,438 107,112 - (50,313) - n/a -
The highest number of shares held by an individual in the table is 0.0031% of total Westpac ordinary shares outstanding as at 30 September 2017.
1
The information relates to the period the individual was a Key Management Personnel. Refer Section 1 for details.
2
Directors’ report
2017 Westpac Group Annual Report 65
Loans to Non-executive Directors and Executive Key Management Personnel disclosures 7.6.
All financial instrument transactions that occurred during the financial year between Directors or Executive KMP and the Group
are in the ordinary course of business on terms and conditions (including interest and collateral) as apply to other employees
and certain customers. These transactions consisted principally of normal personal banking and financial investment services.
Details of loans to Non-executive Directors and Executive KMP (including their related parties) of the Group:
Balance at Start of
the Year
1,2
$
Interest Paid
and Payable
for the Year
$
Interest Not
Charged During
the Year
$
Balance at
End of the
Year
$
Number in
Group at End of
the Year
Non-executive Directors 3,932,987 163,646 - 3,199,593 2
Executive KMP 14,912,791 575,820 - 12,090,727 7
18,845,778 739,466 - 15,290,320 9
Some opening balances have been restated to include additional individual loans.
1
Opening balances are reflective of changes to Key Management Personnel effective from 1 October 2016.
2
Individuals (including their related parties) with loans above $100,000 during the 2017 financial year:
Balance at Start of
the Year
1,2
$
Interest Paid
and Payable
for the Year
$
Interest Not
Charged During
the Year
$
Balance at
End of the
Year
$
Highest
Indebtedness
during the Year
$
Directors
Lindsay Maxsted 2,598,160 111,846 - 2,061,911 2,971,831
Ewen Crouch 1,334,827 51,800 - 1,137,682 1,516,138
Executive KMP
Brian Hartzer 106,748 6,544 - 83,617 191,366
Philip Coffey
3
2,394,000 78,148 - n/a 2,399,831
Brad Cooper 867,571 73,943 - 2,037,998 2,058,343
Alexandra Holcomb 3,665,374 183,799 - 4,114,727 4,122,365
Rebecca Lim 2,856,283 18,096 - 711,642 2,863,432
David McLean 475,551 24,414 - 534,828 597,442
Christine Parker 2,619,094 111,610 - 2,647,386 2,776,565
Gary Thursby 1,928,170 79,266 - 1,960,529 2,088,080
Some opening balances have been restated to include additional individual loans.
1
Opening balances are reflective of changes to Key Management Personnel effective from 1 October 2016.
2
The information relates to the period the individual was a Key Management Personnel. Refer Section 1 of this Report for details.
3
1
66 2017 Westpac Group Annual Report
11. Auditor
a) Auditor’s independence declaration
A copy of the auditor’s independence declaration as required under section 307C of the Corporations Act is below:
Auditor’s Independence Declaration
As lead auditor for the audit of Westpac Banking Corporation for the year ended 30 September 2017, I declare
that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, there have been:
a. no contraventions of the auditor independence requirements of the Corporations Act 2001 in relation to the
audit; and
b. no contraventions of any applicable code of professional conduct in relation to the audit.
This declaration is in respect of Westpac Banking Corporation and the entities it controlled during the period.
Lona Mathis
Partner
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Sydney
6 November 2017
PricewaterhouseCoopers, ABN 52 780 433 757
One International Towers Sydney, Watermans Quay, BARANGAROO NSW 2000
T +61 2 8266 0000, F +61 2 8266 9999, www.pwc.com.au
Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation
Directors’ report
2017 Westpac Group Annual Report 67
Non-audit services b)
We may decide to engage PwC on assignments additional to their statutory audit duties where their expertise or experience
with Westpac or a controlled entity is important.
Details of the non-audit service amounts paid or payable to PwC for non-audit services provided during the 2016 and 2017
financial years are set out in Note 39 to the financial statements.
PwC also provides audit and non-audit services to non-consolidated entities, non-consolidated trusts of which a
Westpac Group entity is trustee, manager or responsible entity and non-consolidated superannuation funds or pension funds.
The fees in respect of these services were approximately $6 million in total (2016 $8.1 million). PwC may also provide audit and
non-audit services to other entities in which Westpac holds a minority interest and which are not consolidated. Westpac is not
aware of the amount of any fees paid to PwC by those entities.
Westpac has a policy on engaging PwC, details of which are set out in Westpac’s Corporate Governance Statement and in the
subsection entitled ‘Engagement of the external auditor’, which forms part of this Directors’ report.
The Board has considered the position and, in accordance with the advice received from the Board Audit Committee, is
satisfied that the provision of the non-audit services during 2017 by PwC is compatible with the general standard of
independence for auditors imposed by the Corporations Act. The Directors are satisfied that the provision of non-audit services
by PwC, as set out above, did not compromise the auditor independence requirements of the Corporations Act for the
following reasons:
all non-audit services have been reviewed by the Board Audit Committee, which is of the view that they do not impact the
impartiality and objectivity of the auditor; and
based on Board quarterly independence declarations made by PwC to the Board Audit Committee, none of the services
undermine the general principles relating to auditor independence including reviewing or auditing PwC’s own work, acting
in a management or a decision-making capacity for the company, acting as advocate for the company or jointly sharing
economic risk and rewards.
12. Responsibility statement
The Directors of Westpac Banking Corporation confirm that to the best of their knowledge:
the consolidated financial statements for the financial year ended 30 September 2017, which have been prepared in
accordance with the accounting policies described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, being in accordance
with Australian Accounting Standards (AAS), give a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities, financial position and profit
of the Group; and
the Annual Report from the section entitled ‘Information on Westpac’ to and including the section entitled ‘Other Westpac
business information’ includes a fair review of the information required by the Disclosure Guidance and Transparency
Rules 4.1.8R to 4.1.11R of the United Kingdom Financial Conduct Authority, together with a description of the principal
risks and uncertainties faced by the Group.
Signed in accordance with a resolution of the Board.
Lindsay Maxsted
Chairman
6 November 2017
Brian Hartzer
Managing Director & Chief Executive Officer
6 November 2017
1
68 2017 Westpac Group Annual Report
This page has been intentionally left blank
Five year summary
Reading this report
Review of Group operations
Divisional performance
Risk and risk management
Westpac’s approach to sustainability
Other Westpac business information
2
Five year summary
1
70 2017 Westpac Group Annual Report
(in $m unless otherwise indicated) 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013
Income statements for the years ended 30 September
2
Net interest income 15,516 15,148 14,267 13,542 12,821
Non-interest income 6,286 5,837 7,375 6,395 5,774
Net operating income before operating expenses
and impairment charges 21,802 20,985 21,642 19,937 18,595
Operating expenses (9,434) (9,217) (9,473) (8,547) (7,976)
Impairment charges (853) (1,124) (753) (650) (847)
Profit before income tax 11,515 10,644 11,416 10,740 9,772
Income tax expense (3,518) (3,184) (3,348) (3,115) (2,947)
Profit attributable to non-controlling interests (7) (15) (56) (64) (74)
Net profit attributable to owners of Westpac
Banking Corporation 7,990 7,445 8,012 7,561 6,751
Balance sheet as at 30 September
2
Loans 684,919 661,926 623,316 580,343 536,164
Other assets 166,956 177,276 188,840 190,499 164,933
Total assets 851,875 839,202 812,156 770,842 701,097
Deposits and other borrowings 533,591 513,071 475,328 460,822 424,482
Debt issues 168,356 169,902 171,054 152,251 144,133
Loan capital 17,666 15,805 13,840 10,858 9,330
Other liabilities 70,920 82,243 98,019 97,574 75,615
Total liabilities 790,533 781,021 758,241 721,505 653,560
Total shareholders' equity and non-controlling interests 61,342 58,181 53,915 49,337 47,537
Key financial ratios
Shareholder value
Dividends per ordinary share (cents) 188 188 187 182 174
Special dividends per ordinary share (cents) - - - - 20
Dividend payout ratio (%)
3
79.28 84.19 73.39 74.68 79.71
Return on average ordinary equity (%) 13.65 13.32 16.23 16.27 15.22
Basic earnings per share (cents) 238.0 224.6 255.0 242.5 217.2
Net tangible assets per ordinary share ($)
4
14.66 13.90 13.02 11.51 11.02
Share price ($):
High 35.39 33.74 40.07 35.99 34.79
Low 28.92 27.57 29.10 30.00 24.23
Close 31.92 29.51 29.70 32.14 32.73
Business performance
Operating expenses to operating income ratio (%) 43.27 43.92 43.77 42.87 42.89
Net interest margin (%) 2.06 2.10 2.09 2.09 2.14
Capital adequacy
Total equity to total assets (%) 7.2 6.9 6.6 6.4 6.8
Total equity to total average assets (%) 7.1 6.9 6.8 6.7 6.9
APRA Basel III:
Common equity Tier 1 (%) 10.56 9.48 9.50 8.97 9.10
Tier 1 ratio (%) 12.66 11.17 11.38 10.56 10.65
Total capital ratio (%) 14.82 13.11 13.26 12.28 12.25
Credit quality
Net impaired assets to equity and collectively assessed provisions (%) 1.29 1.79 1.80 2.49 4.08
Total provisions for impairment on loans and credit commitments to total
loans (basis points) 45 54 53 60 73
Other information
Full time equivalent employees (number at financial year end)
5
35,096 35,580 35,484 36,596 35,894
1
Where accounting classifications have changed or where changes in accounting policy are adopted retrospectively, comparatives have been
revised and may differ from results previously reported.
2
The above income statement extracts for 2017, 2016 and 2015 and balance sheet extracts for 2017 and 2016 are derived from the consolidated
financial statements included in this Annual Report. The above income statement extracts for 2014 and 2013 and balance sheet extracts for
2015, 2014 and 2013 are derived from financial statements previously published.
3
Excludes special dividends and adjusted for Treasury shares.
4
Total equity attributable to owners of Westpac Banking Corporation, after deducting intangible assets divided by the number of ordinary shares
outstanding, less Treasury shares held.
5
Full-time equivalent employees includes full-time, pro-rata part-time, overtime, temporary and contract staff.
Reading this report
2017 Westpac Group Annual Report 71
Disclosure regarding forward-looking statements
This Annual Report contains statements that constitute ‘forward-looking statements’ within the meaning of Section 21E of the
US Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Forward-looking statements are statements about matters that are not historical facts. Forward-looking statements appear in a
number of places in this Annual Report and include statements regarding Westpac’s intent, belief or current expectations with
respect to its business and operations, market conditions, results of operations and financial condition, including, without
limitation, future loan loss provisions and financial support to certain borrowers. Words such as ‘will’, ‘may’, ‘expect’, ‘intend’,
‘seek’, ‘would’, ‘should’, ‘could’, ‘continue’, ‘plan’, ‘estimate’, ‘anticipate’, ‘believe’, ‘probability’, ‘risk’, ‘aim’ or other similar words
are used to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements reflect Westpac’s current views with respect
to future events and are subject to change, certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions which are, in many instances, beyond
Westpac’s control, and have been made based upon management’s expectations and beliefs concerning future developments
and their potential effect upon Westpac. There can be no assurance that future developments will be in accordance with
Westpac’s expectations or that the effect of future developments on Westpac will be those anticipated. Actual results could
differ materially from those expected, depending on the outcome of various factors, including, but not limited to:
the effect of, and changes in, laws, regulations, taxation or accounting standards or practices and government policy,
particularly changes to liquidity, leverage and capital requirements;
regulatory investigations, litigation, fines, penalties, restrictions or other regulator imposed conditions, including as a result
of our failure to comply with laws (such as financial crime laws), regulations or regulatory policy;
internal and external events which may adversely impact Westpac’s reputation;
information security breaches, including cyberattacks;
reliability and security of Westpac’s technology and risks associated with changes to technology systems;
the stability of Australian and international financial systems and disruptions to financial markets and any losses or
business impacts Westpac or its customers or counterparties may experience as a result;
market volatility, including uncertain conditions in funding, equity and asset markets;
adverse asset, credit or capital market conditions;
the conduct, behaviour or practices of Westpac or its staff;
changes to Westpac’s credit ratings or to the methodology used by credit rating agencies;
levels of inflation, interest rates, exchange rates and market and monetary fluctuations;
market liquidity and investor confidence;
changes in economic conditions, consumer spending, saving and borrowing habits in Australia, New Zealand and in other
countries in which Westpac or its customers or counterparties conduct their operations and Westpac’s ability to maintain or
to increase market share, margins and fees, and control expenses;
the effects of competition in the geographic and business areas in which Westpac conducts its operations;
the timely development and acceptance of new products and services and the perceived overall value of these products
and services by customers;
the effectiveness of Westpac’s risk management policies, including internal processes, systems and employees;
the incidence or severity of Westpac insured events;
the occurrence of environmental change (including as a result of climate change) or external events in countries in which
Westpac or its customers or counterparties conduct their operations;
changes to the value of Westpac’s intangible assets;
changes in political, social or economic conditions in any of the major markets in which Westpac or its customers or
counterparties operate;
the success of strategic decisions involving diversification or innovation, in addition to business expansion and integration
of new businesses; and
various other factors beyond Westpac’s control.
The above list is not exhaustive. For certain other factors that may impact on forward-looking statements made by Westpac,
refer to ‘Risk factors’ under the section ‘Risk and risk management’. When relying on forward-looking statements to make
decisions with respect to Westpac, investors and others should carefully consider the foregoing factors and other uncertainties
and events.
Westpac is under no obligation to update any forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report, whether as a result
of new information, future events or otherwise, after the date of this Annual Report.
2
72 2017 Westpac Group Annual Report
Significant developments
For a discussion of significant developments impacting the Group, refer to ‘Significant developments’ under ‘Information on
Westpac’ in Section 1.
Currency of presentation, exchange rates and certain definitions
In this Annual Report, ‘financial statements’ means our audited consolidated balance sheets as at 30 September 2017 and
30 September 2016 and income statements, statements of comprehensive income, changes in equity and cash flows for each
of the years ended 30 September 2017, 2016 and 2015 together with accompanying notes which are included in this Annual
Report.
Our financial year ends on 30 September. As used throughout this Annual Report, the financial year ended 30 September 2017
is referred to as 2017 and other financial years are referred to in a corresponding manner.
We publish our consolidated financial statements in Australian dollars. In this Annual Report, unless otherwise stated or the
context otherwise requires, references to ‘dollars’, ‘dollar amounts’, ‘$’, ‘AUD’ or ‘A$’ are to Australian dollars, references to
‘US$’, ‘USD’ or ‘US dollars’ are to United States dollars and references to ‘NZ$’, ‘NZD’ or ‘NZ dollars’ are to New Zealand
dollars. Solely for the convenience of the reader, certain Australian dollar amounts have been translated into US dollars at a
specified rate. These translations should not be construed as representations that the Australian dollar amounts actually
represent such US dollar amounts or have been or could be converted into US dollars at the rate indicated. Unless otherwise
stated, the translations of Australian dollars into US dollars have been made at the rate of A$1.00 = US$0.7840, the noon
buying rate in New York City for cable transfers in Australian dollars as certified for customs purposes by the Federal Reserve
Bank of New York (the ‘noon buying rate’) as of Friday, 29 September 2017. The Australian dollar equivalent of New Zealand
dollars at 29 September 2017 was A$1.00 = NZ$1.0867, being the closing spot exchange rate on that date. Refer to ‘Exchange
rates’ in Section 4 for information regarding the rates of exchange between the Australian dollar and the US dollar for the
financial years ended 30 September 2013 to 30 September 2017.
Any discrepancies between totals and sums of components in tables contained in this Annual Report are due to rounding.
Review of Group operations
2017 Westpac Group Annual Report 73
Selected consolidated financial and operating data
We have derived the following selected financial information as of, and for the financial years ended, 30 September 2017,
2016, 2015, 2014 and 2013 from our audited consolidated financial statements and related notes.
This information should be read together with our audited consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes
included elsewhere in this Annual Report.
Accounting standards
The financial statements and other financial information included elsewhere in this Annual Report, unless otherwise indicated,
have been prepared and presented in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards (AAS). Compliance with AAS ensures
that the financial statements also comply with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as issued by the International
Accounting Standards Board (IASB).
The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the accounting policies described in the Notes to the financial
statements.
Recent accounting developments
For a discussion of recent accounting developments refer to Note 1 to the financial statements.
Critical accounting estimates
Our reported results are sensitive to the accounting policies, assumptions and estimates that underlie the preparation of the
income statement and the balance sheet. Note 1(b) includes details of the areas of our critical accounting assumptions and
estimates and a reference to the relevant note in the financial statements providing further information. Each of the
assumptions and estimates have been discussed at our Board Audit Committee (BAC). The following is a summary of the
areas involving our most critical accounting estimates.
Fair value of financial instruments
Financial instruments classified as held-for-trading (including derivatives) or designated at fair value through income statement
and financial assets classified as available-for-sale are recognised in the financial statements at fair value. All derivatives are
measured and recognised at fair value. As far as possible, financial instruments are valued with reference to quoted,
observable market prices or by using models which employ observable valuation parameters. Where valuation models rely on
parameters for which inputs are not observable, judgements and estimation may be required.
As at 30 September 2017, the fair value of trading securities and financial assets designated at fair value through profit or loss,
available-for-sale securities, loans designated at fair value, life insurance assets and regulatory deposits with central banks
overseas was $101,923 million (2016: $102,595 million). The value of other financial liabilities at fair value through income
statement, deposits and other borrowings at fair value, debt issues at fair value and life insurance liabilities was $64,317 million
(2016: $67,643 million). The fair value of outstanding derivatives was a net liability of $1,342 million (2016: $3,849 million net
liability). The fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities determined by valuation models that use unobservable market
prices was $1,399 million (2016: $1,587 million) and $9 million (2016: $17 million), respectively. The fair value of financial
assets and financial liabilities, including derivatives, is largely determined based on valuation models using observable market
prices and rates. Where observable market inputs are not available, day one profits or losses are not recognised.
We believe that the judgements and estimates used are reasonable in the current market. However, a change in these
judgements and estimates would lead to different results as future market conditions can vary from those expected.
Provisions for impairment charges on loans
Provisions for credit impairment represent management’s best estimate of the impairment charges incurred in the loan
portfolios as at the balance date. There are two components of our loan impairment provisions: Individually Assessed
Provisions (IAPs) and Collectively Assessed Provisions (CAPs).
IAPs are raised where loans exceeding specified thresholds are assessed as impaired. In determining IAPs, considerations that
have a bearing on the amount and timing of expected future cash flows are taken into account. For example, the business
prospects of the customer, the realisable value of collateral, our position relative to other claimants, the reliability of customer
information and the likely cost and duration of the work-out process. These judgements and estimates can change with time as
new information becomes available or as work-out strategies evolve, resulting in revisions to the impairment provision as
individual decisions are made.
CAPs are raised for impaired loans below specified thresholds and for all loans which are not individually identified as impaired.
The CAPs are established on a portfolio basis taking into account the level of arrears, collateral and security, past loss
experience, current economic conditions, expected default and timing of recovery based on portfolio trends. The most
significant factors in establishing these provisions are estimated loss rates and related emergence periods. The future credit
quality of these portfolios is subject to uncertainties that could cause actual credit losses to differ from reported loan impairment
provisions. These uncertainties include the economic environment, notably interest rates, unemployment levels, payment
behaviour and bankruptcy rates.
As at 30 September 2017, gross loans to customers were $687,785 million (2016: $665,256 million) and the provision for
impairment on loans was $2,866 million (2016: $3,330 million).
2
74 2017 Westpac Group Annual Report
Goodwill
Goodwill represents the excess of purchase consideration, the amount of any non-controlling interest in the acquiree and the
acquisition date fair value of any previous equity interest in the acquiree, over the fair value of the identified net assets of
acquired businesses. The determination of the fair value of the assets and liabilities of acquired businesses requires the
exercise of management judgement. Different fair values would result in changes to the goodwill and to the post-acquisition
performance of the acquisitions.
Goodwill is tested for impairment annually by determining if the carrying value of the cash-generating unit (CGU) that it has
been allocated to is recoverable. The recoverable amount is the higher of the CGU’s fair value less costs to sell and its value-
in-use. Determination of appropriate cash flows and discount rates for the calculation of the value in use is subjective. As at
30 September 2017, the carrying value of goodwill was $9,012 million (2016: $9,030 million).
Superannuation obligations
The actuarial valuation of our defined benefit plan obligations are dependent upon a series of assumptions, the key ones being
price inflation, salary growth, mortality, morbidity, discount rate and investment returns. Different assumptions could
significantly alter the amount of the difference between plan assets and defined benefit obligations and the amount recognised
directly in retained profits.
The aggregate superannuation deficits across all our plans as at 30 September 2017 were $43 million (2016: $282 million).
One plan had a superannuation surplus as at 30 September 2017 of $48 million (2016: $32 million).
Provisions (other than loan impairment charges)
Provisions are held in respect of a range of obligations such as employee entitlements, restructuring costs, litigation provisions,
non-lending losses, impairment charges on credit commitments and surplus lease space. Some of the provisions involve
significant judgement about the likely outcome of various events and estimated future cash flows. Refer Note 29.
Income taxes
The Group is subject to income taxes in Australia and jurisdictions where it has foreign operations. All our businesses
predominantly operate in jurisdictions with similar tax rates to the Australian corporate tax rate. Significant judgement is
required in determining the worldwide provision for income taxes. There are many transactions and calculations undertaken
during the ordinary course of business for which the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. For these circumstances, we hold
appropriate provisions. Where the final outcome of these matters is different from the amounts that were initially recorded, such
differences will impact the current and deferred tax provisions in the period where such determination is made.
Life insurance contract liabilities
The actuarial valuation of life insurance contract liabilities and associated deferred policy acquisition costs are dependent upon
a number of assumptions. The key factors impacting the valuation of these liabilities and related assets are the cost of
providing benefits and administering the contracts, mortality and morbidity experience, discontinuance experience and the rate
at which projected future cash flows are discounted.
Review of Group operations
2017 Westpac Group Annual Report 75
Income statement review
Consolidated income statement
1
For the years ending 30 September 2017 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013
(in $m unless otherwise indicated) US$
2
A$ A$ A$ A$ A$
Interest income 24,486 31,232 31,822 32,295 32,248 33,009
Interest expense (12,321) (15,716) (16,674) (18,028) (18,706) (20,188)
Net interest income 12,165 15,516 15,148 14,267 13,542 12,821
Non-interest income 4,928 6,286 5,837 7,375 6,395 5,774
Net operating income before operating expenses
and impairment charges 17,093 21,802 20,985 21,642 19,937 18,595
Operating expenses (7,396) (9,434) (9,217) (9,473) (8,547) (7,976)
Impairment charges (669) (853) (1,124) (753) (650) (847)
Profit before income tax 9,028 11,515 10,644 11,416 10,740 9,772
Income tax expense (2,758) (3,518) (3,184) (3,348) (3,115) (2,947)
Net profit for the year 6,270 7,997 7,460 8,068 7,625 6,825
Profit attributable to non-controlling interests (6) (7) (15) (56) (64) (74)
Net profit attributable to owners of Westpac
Banking Corporation 6,264 7,990 7,445 8,012 7,561 6,751
Weighted average number of ordinary shares (millions) 3,355 3,355 3,313 3,140 3,114 3,103
Basic earnings per ordinary share (cents) 186.6 238.0 224.6 255.0 242.5 217.2
Diluted earnings per share (cents)
3
179.8 229.3 217.8 248.2 237.6 212.5
Dividends per ordinary share (cents) 147 188 188 187 182 174
Special dividends per ordinary share (cents) - - - - - 20
Dividend payout ratio (%)
4
79.28 79.28 84.19 73.39 74.68 79.71
1
Where accounting classifications have changed or where changes in accounting policy are adopted retrospectively, comparatives have been
revised and may differ from results previously reported.
2
Australian dollar amounts have been translated into US dollars solely for the convenience of the reader at the rate of A$1.00 = US$0.7840, the
noon buying rate in New York City on 29 September 2017.
3
Based on basic earnings per share, with the weighted average number of fully paid ordinary shares outstanding adjusted for the conversion of
dilutive potential ordinary shares, issued for no consideration, and after adjusting earnings for distributions on dilutive potential ordinary shares.
4
Excludes special dividends and adjusted for Treasury shares.
Overview of performance – 2017 v 2016
Net profit attributable to owners of Westpac Banking Corporation for 2017 was $7,990 million, an increase of $545 million or 7%
compared to 2016. Features of this result included a $817 million or 4% increase in net operating income before operating
expenses and impairment charges, a $217 million or 2% increase in operating expenses and a $271 million or 24% decrease in
impairment charges.
Net interest income increased $368 million or 2% compared to 2016, with total loan growth of 3%, primarily from Australian
housing which grew 6%. Reported net interest margin decreased 4 basis points to 2.06% from higher funding costs, the impact
of lower interest rates, and lower treasury earnings, partly offset by loan repricing.
Non-interest income increased $449 million or 8% compared to 2016 primarily due to a $279 million gain associated with sale
of shares in BT Investment Management Limited (BTIM), a rise in trading income of $78 million and the impact of volatility in
economic hedges of $140 million. These increases were partly offset by provisions for customer refunds, and lower wealth
management and insurance income.
Operating expenses increased $217 million or 2% compared to 2016. The rise in operating expenses includes annual salary
and rental increases, higher technology expenses related to the Group’s investment program, a rise in regulatory and
compliance costs and expenses associated with the sale of shares in BTIM. These increases were partially offset by
productivity benefits.
Impairment charges were $271 million lower or 24% compared to 2016. Asset quality remained sound, with stressed exposures
as a percentage of total committed exposures (TCE) at 1.05%, down 15 basis points over the year. The decrease in impairment
charges was primarily due to significantly lower large individual provisions. Additional provisioning for these larger facilities was
required in 2016, following the downgrade to impaired.
The effective tax rate of 30.6% in 2017 was higher than the 2016 effective tax rate of 29.9% as 2016 benefited from the
finalisation of some prior period taxation matters.
2017 basic earnings per share were 238.0 cents per share compared to 224.6 cents per share in 2016.
74 2017 Westpac Group Annual Report
Goodwill
Goodwill represents the excess of purchase consideration, the amount of any non-controlling interest in the acquiree and the
acquisition date fair value of any previous equity interest in the acquiree, over the fair value of the identified net assets of
acquired businesses. The determination of the fair value of the assets and liabilities of acquired businesses requires the
exercise of management judgement. Different fair values would result in changes to the goodwill and to the post-acquisition
performance of the acquisitions.
Goodwill is tested for impairment annually by determining if the carrying value of the cash-generating unit (CGU) that it has
been allocated to is recoverable. The recoverable amount is the higher of the CGU’s fair value less costs to sell and its value-
in-use. Determination of appropriate cash flows and discount rates for the calculation of the value in use is subjective. As at
30 September 2017, the carrying value of goodwill was $9,012 million (2016: $9,030 million).
Superannuation obligations
The actuarial valuation of our defined benefit plan obligations are dependent upon a series of assumptions, the key ones being
price inflation, salary growth, mortality, morbidity, discount rate and investment returns. Different assumptions could
significantly alter the amount of the difference between plan assets and defined benefit obligations and the amount recognised
directly in retained profits.
The aggregate superannuation deficits across all our plans as at 30 September 2017 were $43 million (2016: $282 million).
One plan had a superannuation surplus as at 30 September 2017 of $48 million (2016: $32 million).
Provisions (other than loan impairment charges)
Provisions are held in respect of a range of obligations such as employee entitlements, restructuring costs, litigation provisions,
non-lending losses, impairment charges on credit commitments and surplus lease space. Some of the provisions involve
significant judgement about the likely outcome of various events and estimated future cash flows. Refer Note 29.
Income taxes
The Group is subject to income taxes in Australia and jurisdictions where it has foreign operations. All our businesses
predominantly operate in jurisdictions with similar tax rates to the Australian corporate tax rate. Significant judgement is
required in determining the worldwide provision for income taxes. There are many transactions and calculations undertaken
during the ordinary course of business for which the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. For these circumstances, we hold
appropriate provisions. Where the final outcome of these matters is different from the amounts that were initially recorded, such
differences will impact the current and deferred tax provisions in the period where such determination is made.
Life insurance contract liabilities
The actuarial valuation of life insurance contract liabilities and associated deferred policy acquisition costs are dependent upon
a number of assumptions. The key factors impacting the valuation of these liabilities and related assets are the cost of
providing benefits and administering the contracts, mortality and morbidity experience, discontinuance experience and the rate
at which projected future cash flows are discounted.
2
76 2017 Westpac Group Annual Report
The Board has determined a final dividend of 94 cents per ordinary share. The full year ordinary dividends of 188 cents is
unchanged over ordinary dividends declared in 2016 and a pay-out ratio of 79.3%. The full year ordinary dividend is fully
franked.
The Board considered the impact of the Bank Levy on shareholders (which equated to 2 cents per share in 2017), and decided
to leave the dividend unchanged.
Income statement review – 2017 v 2016
Net interest income – 2017 v 2016
$m 2017 2016 2015
Interest income 31,232 31,822 32,295
Interest expense (15,716) (16,674) (18,028)
Net interest income 15,516 15,148 14,267
Increase/(decrease) in net interest income
Due to change in volume 855 1,313 878
Due to change in rate (487) (432) (153)
Change in net interest income 368 881 725
Net interest income increased $368 million or 2% compared to 2016. Key features include:
4% increase in average interest-earning assets, primarily from growth in Australian housing. Third party liquid assets
increased $11 billion or 13% in response to a $10 billion lower Committed Liquidity Facility (CLF), which reduced from $59
billion to $49 billion on 1 January 2017;
Group net interest margin decreased 4 basis points. Higher funding costs primarily from term deposit competition, the
impact of lower interest rates and lower Treasury earnings were, partly offset by loan repricing and economic hedge
volatility.
Total loans increased $23.0 billion or 3% compared to 2016. Excluding foreign currency translation impacts, total loans
increased $26.0 billion or 4%.
Key features of total loan growth were:
Australian housing loans increased $23.0 billion or 6%. During the year, the Group further tightened origination standards,
reduced new lending discounts and adjusted interest rates on different loan categories. Based on the APRA definition of
investor lending, the Group’s investor property lending grew 6%, below the 10% cap. Fixed rate loans increased from 17%
of the portfolio in 2016 to 21% in 2017;
Australian business loans increased $0.3 billion, with growth in Business Bank (BB) across SME, professional services and
health, largely offset by lower institutional lending including a decline in the utilisation of mortgage warehouse facilities; and
New Zealand lending increased NZ$2.1 billion or 3%. Housing loans grew at 4% and business lending increased 1%
primarily from growth in SME and agriculture. Following the Loan to Value Ratio (LVR) restrictions imposed by the RBNZ
on investor property loans (with an LVR of greater than 60%), the proportion of new flows for investor property lending
decreased by 9 percentage points to 22%.
Total customer deposits increased $20.1 billion or 4% compared to 2016. Excluding foreign currency translation impacts,
customer deposits increased $22.3 billion or 5%.
Key features of total customer deposits growth were:
Australian customer deposits increased $23.8 billion or 6%, with above system
1
growth in household deposits and growth
in institutional deposits. Customers continued to direct funds to mortgage offset accounts, supporting 8% growth in
Australian non-interest bearing deposits. The Group continues to focus on growing higher quality deposits in preparation
for the introduction of the Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR) on 1 January 2018;
New Zealand customer deposits increased NZ$0.9 billion or 2%, with a 14% increase in non-interest bearing deposits from
growth in business and consumer transaction accounts; and
Other overseas deposits decreased $2.6 billion or 18% due to a decline in Asian deposits.
Certificate of deposits increased $0.5 billion or 1%, with lower balances offshore more than offset by growth in Australia.
1
Source: Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA)
Review of Group operations
2017 Westpac Group Annual Report 77
Interest spread and margin – 2017 v 2016
$m 2017 2016 2015
Group
Net interest income 15,516 15,148 14,267
Average interest earning assets 752,294 721,843 683,814
Average interest earning liabilities 694,924 667,276 640,628
Average net non-interest bearing assets, liabilities and equity 57,370 54,567 43,186
Interest spread
1
1.89% 1.91% 1.91%
Benefit of net non-interest bearing assets, liabilities and equity
2
0.17% 0.19% 0.18%
Net interest margin
3
2.06% 2.10% 2.09%
1
Interest spread is the difference between the average yield on all interest earning assets and the average yield on all interest bearing
liabilities.
2
The benefit of net non-interest bearing assets, liabilities and equity is determined by applying the average yield paid on all interest bearing
liabilities to the average level of net non-interest bearing funds as a percentage of average interest earning assets.
3
Net interest margin is calculated by dividing net interest income by average interest earning assets.
Net interest margin was 2.06% in 2017, down 4 basis points compared to 2016. Key drivers of the margin decrease were:
9 basis points increase from loan spreads primarily from the full year impact of Australian mortgage and business lending
repricing in 2016 and changes to Australian mortgage rates for interest-only and investor loans during 2017. This was
partly offset by broad based competition and higher short term funding costs;
5 basis points decrease from customer deposit spreads, driven by increased competition for term deposits in late 2016 and
early 2017 and the impact of lower interest rates on the hedging of transaction deposits;
2 basis points decrease from higher term wholesale funding costs as the Group lengthened average tenors in preparation
for the implementation of NSFR on 1 January 2018 and an increase in Additional Tier 1 and Tier 2 capital balances and the
higher cost of these instruments;
1 basis point decrease from the introduction of the Bank Levy;
Capital and other decreased 2 basis points primarily from the impact of lower interest rates;
2 basis points decrease from liquidity, due to increased holdings of third party liquid assets; and
1 basis point decrease from Treasury and Markets, with lower market volatility impacting returns from interest rate risk
management.
Non-interest income – 2017 v 2016
$m 2017 2016 2015
Fees and commissions 2,755 2,755 2,942
Wealth management and insurance income 1,800 1,899 2,228
Trading income 1,202 1,124 964
Other income 529 59 1,241
Non-interest income 6,286 5,837 7,375
Non-interest income was $6,286 million in 2017, an increase of $449 million or 8% compared to 2016. The increase was
impacted by a number of infrequent items ($136 million), including the profit on the further sale of BTIM shares ($279 million),
provisions for customer refunds and payments related to Advice and wealth products
1
($111 million) and a revaluation loss on
the Group’s investments in boutique funds ($32 million). Excluding these items, non-interest income increased $313 million or
5% due to the impact of hedging New Zealand future earnings, higher Westpac Institutional Bank (WIB) markets income,
increase in operating lease rental income and higher business lending fees, partly offset by lower wealth management and
insurance income and a reduction in Australian credit card interchange fees.
Fees and commissions of $2,755 million in 2017 were flat compared to 2016, due to:
lower Advice income including provisions for customer refunds and payments ($55 million);
lower Australian credit card income ($39 million) primarily from lower revenue associated with rewards programs and
regulatory impacts on interchange rates from 1 July 2017; partly offset by
1
Some of the items provided for include: payments to superannuation customers with pre-existing conditions who did not have the benefit of our
improved disclosure practices and had their claims denied; payments to customers who did not receive all the benefits to which they were entitled
under their ‘packaged accounts’; and refunds where ongoing advice fees were paid but we were unable to demonstrate that advice service was
provided in the relevant period.
2
78 2017 Westpac Group Annual Report
increased business lending fees ($50 million) supported by higher line fees from business growth;
higher New Zealand credit card income ($41 million) primarily from a change to accounting treatment for credit card
rewards scheme to align with Group practice; and
higher transaction fees ($15 million) from an increase in account numbers, pricing changes, and transaction volumes
across the Group.
Wealth management and insurance income was $1,800 million in 2017, a decrease of $99 million or 5% compared to 2016
with:
provisions for customer refunds and payments related to wealth products ($56 million);
insurance income decreased $29 million, primarily from;
- general insurance income reduced $32 million from higher claims, including the impact of Cyclone Debbie, partly offset
by a 2% increase in net earned premiums; and
- life insurance income was little changed (down $3 million) with higher claims partly offset by a 6% increase in net
earned premiums; partly offset by
- higher Lenders mortgage insurance (LMI) income ($6 million) related to arrangements for mortgages with an LVR
>90%;
lower contribution from investments in boutique funds ($26 million); and
a decrease in funds under management (FUM) and funds under administration (FUA) income ($13 million), with the benefit
from higher asset markets and positive net flows more than offset by margin compression from the transfer of legacy
products to lower fee ‘MySuper’ products; partly offset by
increase in WIB wealth management income ($6 million).
Trading income was $1,202 million in 2017, an increase of $78 million or 7% compared to 2016. This was primarily driven by
higher WIB markets income from an increase in risk management income across fixed income, foreign exchange and
commodities and higher derivative valuation adjustments.
Other income was $529 million in 2017, an increase of $470 million compared to 2016. This result was driven by the profit on a
further sale of BTIM shares ($279 million), the impact of hedging New Zealand future earnings ($140 million) and higher rental
income on operating leases ($34 million) from portfolio growth.
Operating expenses – 2017 v 2016
$m 2017 2016 2015
Staff expenses 4,701 4,601 4,704
Occupancy expenses 1,073 1,032 954
Technology expenses 2,008 1,929 2,288
Other expenses 1,652 1,655 1,527
Total operating expenses 9,434 9,217 9,473
Total operating expenses to net operating income ratio 43.27% 43.92% 43.77%
Operating expenses increased $217 million or 2% compared to 2016. The key factors of the result were:
growth in regulation and compliance expenses of $84 million;
higher investment related expenses of $82 million;
separation costs related to the sale of shares in BTIM of $35 million; and
productivity benefits of $262 million largely offset growth in other operating costs.
Staff expenses were $4,701 million, an increase of $100 million or 2% compared to 2016. Annual salary increases, higher
investment costs and separation costs related to the further sale of shares in BTIM were partly offset by productivity benefits,
lower restructuring costs and reduced share based payments.
Occupancy expenses increased $41 million or 4% compared to 2016 due to higher expenses relating to annual rental
expenses and exit costs associated with retail property consolidation and branch network optimisation.
Technology expense increased $79 million or 4% compared to 2016 largely from the completion of key elements of the Group’s
investment programs. This included higher amortisation of software assets ($57 million) and higher software maintenance and
licensing costs ($36 million) from programs including the Customer Service Hub, Panorama, new payment platform and
systems for regulatory and compliance purposes.
Review of Group operations
2017 Westpac Group Annual Report 79
Other expenses decreased $3 million compared to 2016. The increase in regulatory and compliance costs have been mostly
offset by lower outsourced operational costs. In addition, non-lending losses were $8 million lower from reduced credit card and
digital fraud, which has benefitted from recent enhancements to early detection capability and additional security.
Impairment charges – 2017 v 2016
$m 2017 2016 2015
Impairment charges 853 1,124 753
Impairment charges to average gross loans (basis points) 13 17 12
Asset quality improved through 2017 with stressed assets to total committed exposures reducing 15 basis points to 1.05%. The
reduction in stress mostly reflects the work-out or return to health of a number of watchlist and substandard facilities. Impaired
assets were also lower, with gross impaired assets to gross loans reducing 10 basis points to 0.22%. The reduction in impaired
assets principally related to the work-out or write-off of a small number of institutional facilities. Where stress in the portfolio has
emerged it can mostly be traced back to the slowdown in mining investment, sectors undergoing structural change, along with a
rises in delinquencies and properties in possession in these regions, particularly in Western Australia and Queensland.
The improved asset quality and the write-off of a small number of larger impaired facilities led to a reduction in provisions which
were down $483 million. IAPs were $389 million lower while collectively assessed provisions were $94 million lower. Within
collectively assessed provisions the economic overlay was reduced by $66 million, ending at $323 million as at 30 September
2017.
This trend of improved asset quality and work-out of existing stressed facilities has contributed to the reduction in impairment
charges in 2017.
Impairment charges of $853 million were down $271 million or 24% compared to 2016.
Key movements included:
total new IAPs less write-backs and recoveries were $226 million lower than 2016. New IAPs decreased $117 million
primarily due to a small number of large impairments in WIB in 2016 whereas there were only two larger facilities that
migrated to impaired over 2017. This was partially offset by higher new IAPs in the Business Bank and in mortgages. 2017
also benefited from a larger number of write-backs and recoveries which were $109 million higher than 2016 as impaired
facilities were worked out; and
CAPs were $45 million lower due to a $66 million reduction in the economic overlay provision and a $45 million benefit
from improvement in asset quality, partially offset by a $66 million lift in write-offs principally in personal lending associated
with changes to reporting of customers granted hardship assistance.
Income tax expense – 2017 v 2016
$m 2017 2016 2015
Income tax expense 3,518 3,184 3,348
Tax as a percentage of profit before income tax expense (effective tax rate) 30.55% 29.91% 29.33%
The effective tax rate of 30.6% in 2017 was higher than the 2016 effective tax rate of 29.9% as 2016 benefited from the
finalisation of some prior period taxation matters. The effective tax rate above the Australian corporate tax rate of 30% reflects
several Additional Tier 1 instruments whose distributions are not deductible for Australian taxation purposes.
2
80 2017 Westpac Group Annual Report
Balance sheet review
Selected consolidated balance sheet data
1
The detailed components of the balance sheet are set out in the notes to the financial statements.
As at 30 September 2017 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013
US$m
2
A$m A$m A$m A$m A$m
Cash and balances with central banks 14,423 18,397 17,015 14,770 25,760 11,699
Receivables due from other financial institutions 5,588 7,128 9,951 9,583 7,424 11,210
Trading securities and financial assets designated at
fair value and available-for-sale securities 67,451 86,034 81,833 82,287 81,933 79,100
Derivative financial instruments 18,842 24,033 32,227 48,173 41,404 28,356
Loans 536,976 684,919 661,926 623,316 580,343 536,164
Life insurance assets 8,344 10,643 14,192 13,125 11,007 13,149
All other assets 16,246 20,721 22,058 20,902 22,971 21,419
Total assets 667,870 851,875 839,202 812,156 770,842 701,097
Payables due to other financial institutions 17,175 21,907 18,209 18,731 18,636 8,836
Deposits and other borrowings 418,335 533,591 513,071 475,328 460,822 424,482
Other financial liabilities at fair value through
income statement 3,180 4,056 4,752 9,226 19,236 10,302
Derivative financial instruments 19,894 25,375 36,076 48,304 39,539 32,990
Debt issues 131,991 168,356 169,902 171,054 152,251 144,133
Life insurance liabilities 7,071 9,019 12,361 11,559 9,637 11,938
All other liabilities 8,282 10,563 10,845 10,199 10,526 11,549
Total liabilities excluding loan capital 605,928 772,867 765,216 744,401 710,647 644,230
Total loan capital 13,850 17,666 15,805 13,840 10,858 9,330
Total liabilities 619,778 790,533 781,021 758,241 721,505 653,560
Net assets 48,092 61,342 58,181 53,915 49,337 47,537
Total equity attributable to owners of Westpac
Banking Corporation 48,050 61,288 58,120 53,098 48,456 46,674
Non-controlling interests 42 54 61 817 881 863
Total shareholders' equity and non-
controlling interests 48,092 61,342 58,181 53,915 49,337 47,537
Average balances
Total assets 677,788 864,525 843,555 798,703 737,124 688,295
Loans and other receivables
3
515,917 658,058 629,159 594,200 559,789 516,482
Total equity attributable to owners of Westpac
Banking Corporation 45,908 58,556 55,896 49,361 46,477 44,350
Non-controlling interests 16 20 575 854 862 1,972
1
Where accounting classifications have changed or where changes in accounting policy are adopted retrospectively, comparatives have been
revised and may differ from results previously reported.
2
Australian dollar amounts have been translated into US dollars solely for the convenience of the reader at the rate of A$1.00 = US$0.7840,
the noon buying rate in New York City on 29 September 2017.
3
Includes interest earning balances. Other receivables include cash and balances with central banks and other interest earning assets.
Review of Group operations
2017 Westpac Group Annual Report 81
Summary of consolidated ratios
As at 30 September 2017 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013
(in $m unless otherwise indicated) US$
1
A$ A$ A$ A$ A$
Profitability ratios (%)
Net interest margin
2
2.06 2.06 2.10 2.09 2.09 2.14
Return on average assets
3
0.92 0.92 0.88 1.00 1.03 0.98
Return on average ordinary equity
4
13.65 13.65 13.32 16.23 16.27 15.22
Return on average total equity
5
13.64 13.64 13.18 15.96 15.97 14.57
Capital ratios (%)
Average total equity to average total assets 6.78 6.78 6.69 6.29 6.42 6.73
Common equity Tier 1 10.56 10.56 9.48 9.50 8.97 9.10
Tier 1 ratio 12.66 12.66 11.17 11.38 10.56 10.65
Total capital ratio 14.82 14.82 13.11 13.26 12.28 12.25
Earning ratios
Basic earnings per ordinary share (cents)
6
186.6 238.0 224.6 255.0 242.5 217.2
Diluted earnings per ordinary share (cents)
7
179.8 229.3 217.8 248.2 237.6 212.5
Dividends per ordinary share (cents) 147 188 188 187 182 174
Special dividends per ordinary share (cents) - - - - - 20
Dividend payout ratio (%) 79.28 79.28 84.19 73.39 74.68 79.71
Credit quality ratios
Impairment charges on loans written off (net of recoveries) 1,167 1,488 1,052 1,107 1,302 1,323
Impairment charges on loans written off (net of recoveries) to
average loans (bps) 22 22 16 18 23 25
1
Australian dollar amounts have been translated into US dollars solely for the convenience of the reader at the rate of A$1.00 = US$0.7840, the
noon buying rate in New York City on 29 September 2017.
2
Calculated by dividing net interest income by average interest earning assets.
3
Calculated by dividing net profit attributable to owners of Westpac Banking Corporation by average total assets.
4
Calculated by dividing net profit attributable to owners of Westpac Banking Corporation by average ordinary equity.
5
Calculated by dividing net profit attributable to owners of Westpac Banking Corporation by average ordinary equity and non-controlling interests.
6
Based on the weighted average number of fully paid ordinary shares.
7
Based on basic earnings per share, with the weighted average number of fully paid ordinary shares outstanding adjusted for the conversion
of dilutive potential ordinary shares, issued for no consideration, and after adjusting earnings for distributions on dilutive potential ordinary
shares.
Balance sheet review
Assets – 2017 v 2016
Total assets as at 30 September 2017 were $851.9 billion, an increase of $12.7 billion or 2% compared to 30 September 2016.
Significant movements during the year included:
cash and balances with central banks increased $1.4 billion or 8% reflecting higher liquid assets;
receivables due from other financial institutions decreased $2.8 billion or 28% mainly due to reduction in collateral posted
with derivative counterparties;
trading securities and financial assets designated at fair value and available-for-sale securities increased $4.2 billion or 5%
in response to a CLF reduction on 1 January 2017;
derivative assets decreased $8.2 billion or 25% mainly driven by the closing out of positions via cash settlement, partly
offset by movements in foreign currency translation impacts on cross currency swaps and forward contracts;
loans grew $23.0 billion or 3%. Refer to loan quality – 2017 v 2016 below for further information; and
life insurance assets decreased $3.5 billion or 25% mainly due to the deconsolidation of 16 managed funds as a result of a
decline in the Group’s unit holdings.
2
82 2017 Westpac Group Annual Report
Liabilities and equity – 2017 v 2016
Total liabilities as at 30 September 2017 were $790.5 billion, an increase of $9.5 billion or 1% compared to 30 September 2016.
Significant movements during the year included:
payables due to other financial institutions increased $3.7 billion or 20% due to increased funding of securities through
repurchase agreement and interbank borrowings, partially offset by lower offshore central bank deposits;
deposits and other borrowings increased $20.5 billion or 4%;
other financial liabilities at fair value through the income statement decreased $0.7 billion or 15% reflecting reduced
securities sold through repurchase agreements;
derivative liabilities decreased $10.7 billion or 30% mainly driven by the closing out of positions via cash settlement, partly
offset by movements in foreign currency translation impacts on cross currency swaps and forward contracts;
debt issues decreased $1.5 billion or 1% ($1.7 billion or 1% increase excluding foreign currency translation impacts);
life insurance liabilities decreased $3.3 billion or 27% mainly due to the deconsolidation of 16 managed funds as a result of
a decline in the Group’s unit holdings; and
loan capital increased $1.9 billion or 12% mainly due to issuances of $1.6 billion of USD Additional Tier 1 securities and
net issuances of $0.3 billion of Tier 2 subordinated notes. During the year $2.5 billion of Tier 2 Basel III fully compliant
subordinated notes were issued, mostly offset by the redemption of $2.2 billion of Tier 2 Basel III transitional subordinated
notes (including foreign currency translation impacts).
Equity attributable to owners of Westpac Banking Corporation increased $3.2 billion reflecting additional retained profits less
dividends paid during the period and shares issued under the 2017 interim DRP and 2016 final DRP.
Loan quality – 2017 v 2016
As at 30 September
$m 2017 2016 2015
Total gross loans
1
687,785 665,256 626,344
Average gross loans
Australia 588,920 562,633 526,378
New Zealand 72,269 67,686 62,508
Other overseas 12,837 15,112 15,906
Total average gross loans 674,026 645,431 604,792
1
Gross loans are stated before related provisions for impairment.
Total gross loans represented 81% of the total assets of the Group as at 30 September 2017, compared to 79% in 2016.
Australia average gross loans were $588.9 billion in 2017, an increase of $26.3 billion or 5% from $562.6 billion in 2016. This
increase was primarily due to growth in housing lending.
New Zealand average gross loans were $72.3 billion in 2017, an increase of $4.6 billion or 7% from $67.7 billion in 2016. This
increase was primarily due to growth in housing lending.
Other overseas average loans were $12.8 billion in 2017, a decrease of $2.3 billion or 15% from $15.1 billion in 2016. This was
primarily due to a decline in Asia.
Approximately 13.1% of the loans at 30 September 2017 mature within one year and 18.9% mature between one year and five
years. Retail lending comprises the majority of the loan portfolio maturing after five years.
Review of Group operations
2017 Westpac Group Annual Report 83
As at 30 September
$m 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013
Impaired loans
Non-performing loans
1
:
Gross 1,142 1,851 1,593 2,030 3,249
Impairment provisions (507) (885) (689) (862) (1,363)
Net 635 966 904 1,168 1,886
Restructured loans:
Gross 27 31 39 93 156
Impairment provisions (12) (16) (16) (44) (56)
Net 15 15 23 49 100
Overdrafts, personal loans and revolving credit facilities greater than
90 days past due:
Gross 373 277 263 217 195
Impairment provisions (195) (166) (172) (141) (135)
Net 178 111 91 76 60
Net impaired loans 828 1,092 1,018 1,293 2,046
Provisions for impairment on loans and credit commitments
Individually assessed provisions 480 869 669 867 1,364
Collectively assessed provisions 2,639 2,733 2,663 2,614 2,585
Total provisions for impairment on loans and
credit commitments 3,119 3,602 3,332 3,481 3,949
Loan quality
Total impairment provisions for impaired loans to total impaired loans
2
46.30% 49.42% 46.28% 44.76% 43.17%
Total impaired loans to total loans 0.22% 0.32% 0.30% 0.40% 0.67%
Total provisions for impairment on loans and credit commitments
to total loans 0.45% 0.54% 0.53% 0.60% 0.73%
Total provisions for impairment on loans and credit commitments to total
impaired loans 202.3% 166.8% 175.8% 148.8% 109.7%
1
Non-performing loans are loans with an impaired internal risk grade, excluding restructured assets.
2
Impairment provisions relating to impaired loans include IAP plus the proportion of the CAP that relate to impaired loans. The proportion of the CAP
that relates to impaired loans was $234 million as at 30 September 2017 (2016: $198 million, 2015: $208 million, 2014: $180 million,
2013: $190 million). This sum is compared to the total gross impaired loans to determine this ratio.
The credit quality of the portfolio improved over 2017, with total stressed exposures to TCE remaining low. Total impaired loans
as a percentage of total gross loans were 0.22% at 30 September 2017, a decrease of 0.10% from 0.32% at 30 September
2016.
At 30 September 2017, we had one impaired counterparty with exposure greater than $50 million, accounting for 5% of total
impaired loans. This compares to four impaired counterparties with exposure greater than $50 million in 2016 accounting for
30% of total impaired loans. There were four impaired exposures at 30 September 2017 that were less than $50 million and
greater than $20 million (2016: seven impaired exposures).
At 30 September 2017, 78% of our exposure was to either investment grade or secured consumer mortgage segment (2016:
78%, 2015: 77%, 2014: 77%) and 96% of our exposure as at 30 September 2017 was in Australia, New Zealand and the
Pacific region (2016: 96%, 2015: 95%, 2014: 95%).
We believe that Westpac remains appropriately provisioned. Total impairment provisions for impaired loans to total impaired
loans coverage at 46.3% at 30 September 2017 compared to 49.4% at 30 September 2016. Total provisions for impairment on
loans and credit commitments to total impaired loans represented 202.3% of total impaired loans as at 30 September 2017, up
from 166.8% at 30 September 2016. Total provisions for impairments on loans and credit commitments to total loans were
0.45% at 30 September 2017, down from 0.54% at 30 September 2016 (2015: 0.53%).
Group mortgage loans 90 days past due at 30 September 2017 were 0.62% of outstandings, up from 0.61% of outstandings at
30 September 2016 (2015: 0.42%).
Group other consumer loan delinquencies (including credit card and personal loan products) were 1.57% of outstandings as at
30 September 2017, an increase of 46 basis points from 1.11% of outstandings as at 30 September 2016 (2015: 1.07%).
Potential problem loans as at 30 September 2017 amounted to $1,247 million, a decrease of 13% from $1,436 million at
30 September 2016. The decrease in potential problem loans was mainly due to the upgrade of loans that were impacted by
the downturn in the New Zealand dairy portfolio.
2
84 2017 Westpac Group Annual Report
Potential problem loans are facilities that are performing and no loss is expected, but the customer demonstrates significant
weakness in debt servicing or security cover that could jeopardise repayment of debt on current terms if not rectified. Potential
problem loans are identified using established credit frameworks and policies, which include the ongoing monitoring of facilities
through the use of watchlists.
Capital resources
APRA measures an ADI’s regulatory capital using three measures:
Common Equity Tier 1 Capital (CET1) comprises the highest quality components of capital that consists of paid-up share
capital, retained profits and certain reserves, less certain intangible assets, capitalised expenses and software, and
investments and retained profits in insurance and funds management subsidiaries that are not consolidated for capital
adequacy purposes;
Tier 1 Capital being the sum of CET1 and Additional Tier 1 Capital. Additional Tier 1 Capital comprises high quality
components of capital that consists of certain securities not included in CET1, but which include loss absorbing
characteristics; and
Total Capital being the sum of Tier 1 Capital and Tier 2 Capital. Tier 2 Capital includes subordinated instruments and other
components of capital that, to varying degrees, do not meet the criteria for Tier 1 Capital, but nonetheless contribute to the
overall strength of an ADI and its capacity to absorb losses.
Under APRA’s Prudential Standards, Australian ADIs, including Westpac, are required to maintain a minimum CET1 ratio of at
least 4.5%, Tier 1 ratio of at least 6.0% and Total Regulatory Capital of at least 8.0%. APRA may also require ADIs, including
Westpac, to meet Prudential Capital Requirements (PCRs) above the minimum capital ratios. APRA does not allow the PCRs
for individual ADIs to be disclosed.
APRA also requires ADIs to hold additional CET1 buffers comprising of:
a capital conservation buffer (CCB) of 3.5%, for ADI’s designated by APRA as domestic systemically important banks
(D-SIBs) (unless otherwise determined by APRA), which includes a 1.0% surcharge for D-SIBs. APRA has determined that
Westpac is a D-SIB; and
a countercyclical buffer. The countercyclical buffer is set on a jurisdictional basis and APRA is responsible for setting the
requirement in Australia. The countercyclical buffer requirement is currently set to zero for Australia and New Zealand.
Collectively, the above buffers are referred to as the "Capital Buffer". Should the CET1 capital ratio fall within the capital buffer
range, restrictions on the distributions of earnings will apply. This includes restrictions on the amount of earnings that can be
distributed through dividends, Additional Tier 1 Capital distributions and discretionary staff bonuses.
Capital management strategy
Westpac’s approach to capital management seeks to balance the fact that capital is an expensive form of funding with the need
to be adequately capitalised. Westpac considers the need to balance efficiency, flexibility and adequacy when determining
sufficiency of capital and when developing capital management plans.
Westpac evaluates these considerations through an Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process (ICAAP), the key features
of which include:
the development of a capital management strategy, including consideration of regulatory minimums, capital buffers and
contingency plans;
consideration of both economic and regulatory capital requirements;
a stress testing framework that challenges the capital measures, coverage and requirements including the impact of
adverse economic scenarios; and
consideration of the perspectives of external stakeholders including rating agencies and equity and debt investors.
In light of APRA’s announcement on ‘unquestionably strong’ capital on 19 July 2017, Westpac has ceased to use its preferred
range of 8.75% to 9.25% as a guide to managing capital levels. Westpac will revise its preferred range for the CET1 ratio once
APRA finalises its review of the capital adequacy framework. In the interim, Westpac will seek to operate with a CET1 ratio of at
least 10.5% in March and September as measured under the existing capital framework. This also takes into consideration:
current regulatory capital minimums and the CCB, which together are the total CET1 requirement;
stress testing to calibrate an appropriate buffer against a downturn; and
quarterly volatility of capital ratios due to the half yearly cycle of ordinary dividend payments.
Review of Group operations
2017 Westpac Group Annual Report 85
Basel Capital Accord
APRA’s risk-based capital adequacy standards are generally consistent with the International Regulatory Framework for Banks,
also known as Basel III, issued by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS), except where APRA has exercised
certain discretions. On balance, the application of these discretions acts to reduce capital ratios reported under APRA’s
Prudential Standards relative to the BCBS approach and to those reported in some other jurisdictions.
Westpac is accredited by APRA to apply advanced models permitted by the Basel III global capital adequacy regime to the
measurement of its regulatory capital requirements. Westpac uses the Advanced Internal Ratings Based approach for credit
risk, the Advanced Measurement Approach (AMA) for operational risk and the internal model approach for Interest Rate Risk in
the Banking Book (IRRBB).
Westpac’s Level 2 regulatory capital ratios as at 30 September are summarised in the table below. As the table summarises
Westpac’s Level 2 regulatory capital structure, the capital amounts shown are not the same as the Westpac Group’s
consolidated financial statements. Westpac’s Pillar 3 Report provides further details regarding Westpac’s capital structure.
$m 2017 2016
Common equity 60,520 57,235
Deductions from common equity (17,850) (18,360)
Total common equity after deductions 42,670 38,875
Additional Tier 1 capital 8,505 6,910
Net Tier 1 regulatory capital 51,175 45,785
Tier 2 capital 8,952 8,201
Deductions from Tier 2 capital (217) (218)
Total Tier 2 capital after deductions 8,735 7,983
Total regulatory capital 59,910 53,768
Credit risk 349,258 358,812
Market risk 8,094 7,861
Operational risk 31,229 33,363
Interest rate risk in the banking book 11,101 5,373
Other assets 4,553 4,644
Total risk weighted assets 404,235 410,053
Common Equity Tier 1 capital ratio 10.56% 9.48%
Additional Tier 1 capital ratio 2.10% 1.69%
Tier 1 capital ratio 12.66% 11.17%
Tier 2 capital ratio 2.16% 1.94%
Total regulatory capital ratio 14.82% 13.11%
Refer to ‘Significant developments’ in Section 1 for a discussion on future regulatory developments that may impact upon
capital requirements.
2
Divisional performance
86 2017 Westpac Group Annual Report
Divisional performance – 2017 v 2016
Westpac reports under the following five primary customer-facing business divisions:
Consumer Bank, which we refer to as CB: responsible for all Australian consumer relationships across all brands;
Business Bank, which we refer to as BB: responsible for all Australian business and commercial consumer relationships
across all brands;
BT Financial Group (Australia), which we refer to as BTFG: responsible for the Group's wealth management, insurance
and private banking businesses;
Westpac Institutional Bank, which we refer to as WIB: responsible for the relationship with institutional and corporate
customers, along with the Group's international operations including Asia and the Pacific; and
Westpac New Zealand: responsible for all customer segments in New Zealand.
Group Businesses include Treasury, Group Technology and Core Support.
The Group has completed an update to its capital allocation framework. The update further improves the alignment of capital
held by divisions with regulatory capital requirements. Divisional results have been restated for 2016 and 2015 to ensure
comparability with 2017 results (refer to Note 2 to the financial statements for the disclosure of the Group’s reportable operating
segments and revisions to capital allocation).
The accounting standard AASB 8 Operating Segments requires segment results to be presented on a basis that is consistent
with information provided internally to Westpac’s key decision makers. In assessing financial performance, including divisional
results, Westpac Group uses a measure of performance referred to as ‘cash earnings’. Cash earnings is viewed as a measure
of the level of profit that is generated by ongoing operations and is therefore considered in assessing distributions, including
dividends. Cash earnings is neither a measure of cash flow nor net profit determined on a cash accounting basis, as it includes
non-cash items reflected in net profit determined in accordance with AAS. To calculate cash earnings, the specific adjustments
to the net profit attributable to owners of Westpac Banking Corporation include both cash and non-cash items and are outlined
below. Management believes this allows the Group to more effectively assess performance for the current period against prior
periods and to compare performance across business divisions and across peer companies.
A reconciliation of cash earnings to net profit attributable to owners of Westpac Banking Corporation for each business division
is set out in Note 2 to the financial statements.
To determine cash earnings, three categories of adjustments are made to statutory results:
material items that key decision makers at Westpac believe do not reflect ongoing operations;
items that are not considered when dividends are recommended, such as the amortisation of intangibles, impact of
Treasury shares and economic hedging impacts; and
accounting reclassifications between individual line items that do not impact statutory results.
The discussion of our divisional performance in this section is presented on a cash earnings basis unless otherwise stated.
Cash earnings is not directly comparable to statutory results presented in other parts of this Annual Report.
Outlined below are the cash earnings adjustments to the reported result:
amortisation of intangible assets: The merger with St.George and the acquisition of select Lloyds' Australian businesses
resulted in the recognition of identifiable intangible assets. Notional identifiable intangible assets were also recognised
within the carrying value of BTIM during the period this investment was equity accounted. The intangible assets recognised
relate to core deposits, customer relationships, management contracts and distribution relationships. These intangible
items are amortised over their useful lives, ranging between four and twenty years. This amortisation (excluding capitalised
software) is a cash earnings adjustment because it is a non-cash flow item and does not affect cash distributions available
to shareholders;
acquisition, transaction and integration expenses: Costs associated with the acquisition of select Lloyds' Australian
businesses were treated as a cash earnings adjustment as they do not reflect the earnings expected from the acquired
businesses following the integration period;
capitalised technology cost balances: Following changes to the Group's technology and digital strategy, rapid changes in
technology and evolving regulatory requirements, a number of accounting changes were introduced in 2015, including
moving to an accelerated amortisation methodology for most existing assets with a useful life of greater than three years,
writing off the capitalised cost of regulatory program assets where the regulatory requirements have changed and directly
expensing more project costs. The expense recognised in 2015 to reduce the carrying value of impacted assets was
treated as a cash earnings adjustment given its size and that it does not reflect ongoing operations;
fair value on economic hedges (which do not qualify for hedge accounting under AAS) comprise:
- the unrealised fair value (gain)/loss on foreign exchange hedges of future New Zealand earnings impacting non-
interest income is reversed in deriving cash earnings as they may create a material timing difference on reported
results but do not affect the Group's cash earnings over the life of the hedge; and
Divisional performance
2017 Westpac Group Annual Report 87
- the unrealised fair value (gain)/loss on hedges of accrual accounted term funding transactions are reversed in deriving
cash earnings as they may create a material timing difference on reported results but do not affect the Group's cash
earnings over the life of the hedge;
ineffective hedges: The unrealised (gain)/loss on ineffective hedges is reversed in deriving cash earnings for the period
because the gain or loss arising from the fair value movement in these hedges reverses over time and does not affect the
Group's profits over time;
Lloyds tax adjustments: Tax adjustments arising from the acquisition of Lloyds have been treated as a cash earnings
adjustment in line with our treatment of Lloyds acquisition and integration costs;
sale of BTIM shares: During 2015 the Group recognised a significant gain following the partial sale of the Group’s
shareholding in BTIM. This gain has been treated as a cash earnings adjustment given its size and that it does not reflect
ongoing operations. During 2017 the Group recognised a gain, net of costs, following the further sell down of the Group's
shareholding in BTIM. Consistent with previous treatment this gain has been treated as a cash earnings adjustment given
its size and that it does not reflect ongoing operations. The Group has indicated that it may sell the remaining 10%
shareholding in BTIM at some future date. Any future gain or loss on the sale will similarly be excluded from the calculation
of cash earnings;
Treasury shares: Under AAS, Westpac shares held by the Group in the managed funds and life businesses are deemed to
be Treasury shares and the results of holding these shares cannot be recognised as income in the reported results. In
deriving cash earnings, these results are included to ensure there is no asymmetrical impact on the Group’s profits
because the Treasury shares support policyholder liabilities and equity derivative transactions which are re-valued in
determining income;
accounting reclassifications between individual line items that do not impact reported results comprise:
- in 2017 the Group changed the accounting treatment for Westpac New Zealand credit card rewards scheme to align
with Group practice. This change has no impact on cash earnings or reported profit but it has led to the restatement of
non-interest income and operating expenses, within cash earnings, in prior periods. Components of reported profit
have not been changed;
- policyholder tax recoveries: Income and tax amounts that are grossed up to comply with the AAS accounting standard
covering Life Insurance Business (policyholder tax recoveries) are reversed in deriving income and taxation expense
on a cash earnings basis; and
- operating leases: Under AAS rental income on operating leases is presented gross of the depreciation of the assets
subject to the lease. These amounts are offset in deriving non-interest income and operating expenses on a cash
earnings basis.
The guidance provided in Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) Regulatory Guide 230 has been followed
when presenting this information.
2
88 2017 Westpac Group Annual Report
Cash earnings and assets by division
The following tables present, for each of the key divisions of our business, the cash earnings and total assets at the end of the
financial years ended 30 September 2017, 2016 and 2015. Refer to Note 2 to the financial statements for the disclosure of our
geographic and business segments and the reconciliation to net profit attributable to owners of Westpac Banking Corporation.
Cash earnings by business division
$m 2017 2016 2015
Consumer Bank 3,104 2,984 2,625
Business Bank 2,099 1,975 1,957
BT Financial Group (Australia) 771 868 906
Westpac Institutional Bank 1,304 1,106 1,357
Westpac New Zealand 916 825 863
Group Businesses (132) 64 112
Total cash earnings 8,062 7,822 7,820
Total assets by business division
$bn 2017 2016 2015
Consumer Bank 369.5 351.5 328.6
Business Bank 161.1 156.8 149.3
BT Financial Group (Australia) 35.2 38.2 35.8
Westpac Institutional Bank 102.9 110.4 127.3
Westpac New Zealand 81.3 82.1 71.5
Group Businesses 101.9 100.2 99.7
Total assets 851.9 839.2 812.2
In presenting divisional results on a management reporting basis, internal charges and transfer pricing adjustments are
included in the performance of each division reflecting the management structure rather than the legal entity (these results
cannot be compared to results for individual legal entities). Where management reporting structures or accounting
classifications have changed, financial results for comparative periods have been revised and may differ from results previously
reported.
Our internal transfer pricing frameworks facilitate risk transfer, profitability measurement, capital allocation and business unit
alignment, tailored to the jurisdictions in which we operate. Transfer pricing allows us to measure the relative contribution of our
products and divisions to the Group’s interest margin and other dimensions of performance. Key components of our transfer
pricing frameworks are funds transfer pricing for interest rate and liquidity risk and allocation of basis and contingent liquidity
costs, including capital allocation.
Divisional performance
2017 Westpac Group Annual Report 89
Consumer Bank
Consumer Bank (CB) is responsible for sales and service to consumer customers in Australia under the Westpac, St.George,
BankSA, Bank of Melbourne and RAMS brands. Activities are conducted through a dedicated team of specialist consumer
relationship managers along with an extensive network of branches, call centres and ATMs. Customers are also supported by a
range of internet and mobile banking solutions. CB also works in an integrated way with BTFG and WIB in the sales and
service of select financial services and products including in wealth and foreign exchange. The revenue from these products is
mostly retained by the product originator.
Financial performance
$m 2017 2016 2015
Net interest income 7,509 7,175 6,403
Non-interest income 802 850 940
Net operating income before operating expenses and impairment charges 8,311 8,025 7,343
Operating expenses (3,337) (3,270) (3,113)
Impairment charges (541) (492) (478)
Profit before income tax 4,433 4,263 3,752
Income tax expense (1,329) (1,279) (1,127)
Cash earnings for the year 3,104 2,984 2,625
Net cash earnings adjustments (116) (116) (116)
Net profit attributable to owners of Westpac Banking Corporation 2,988 2,868 2,509
$bn $bn $bn
Deposits and other borrowings 191.8 180.6 168.2
Net loans 362.5 344.8 320.7
Total assets 369.5 351.5 328.6
Total operating expenses to net operating income ratio 40.15% 40.75% 42.39%
2017 v 2016
The 4% rise in cash earnings to $3,104 million, was due to balance sheet growth and disciplined expense management.
Net interest
income up $334
million, 5%
mortgages growth was slightly below system
1
. The decline in other lending was in credit cards and
personal loans (in line with lower system
1
balances);
the above system growth in deposits included a 9% lift in transaction account balances; and
net interest margin was 3 basis points lower primarily from higher wholesale funding and deposits
costs, partly offset by some repricing and continued discipline on discounting.
Non-interest
income down
$48 million, 6%
decline mostly due to lower cards income (net impact of interchange fee changes, loyalty point
redemption costs, and a prior year benefit not repeated) and provisions for customer refunds and
payments; partly offset by;
some fee repricing and higher foreign exchange income.
Operating
expenses up
$67 million, 2%
higher technology and investment related costs;
a rise in regulatory and compliance spending;
increased product development and marketing costs; and
productivity benefits largely offset business as usual expense increases.
Impairment
charges up $49
million, 10%
higher impairments were mostly due to an increase in mortgage IAPs for regions impacted by the
slowing of the mining investment cycle and CAPs for hardship changes in the other consumer
lending portfolio; and
90+ day other consumer loan delinquencies were higher mostly due to changes in the measurement
and reporting of customers in hardship arrangements. Excluding hardship changes, 90+ day
delinquencies improved.
1
Source: RBA September 2017.
2
90 2017 Westpac Group Annual Report
Business Bank
Business Bank (BB) is responsible for sales and service to micro, SME and commercial business customers in Australia for
facilities up to approximately $150 million. The division operates under the Westpac, St.George, BankSA and Bank of
Melbourne brands. Customers are provided with a wide range of banking and financial products and services to support their
borrowing, payments and transaction needs. In addition, specialist services are provided for cash flow finance, trade finance,
automotive and equipment finance, property finance and treasury. The division is also responsible for consumer customers with
auto finance loans. BB works in an integrated way with BTFG and WIB in the sales and service of select financial services and
products including corporate superannuation, foreign exchange and interest rate hedging. The revenue from these products is
mostly retained by the product originator.
Financial performance
$m 2017 2016 2015
Net interest income 4,055 3,925 3,735
Non-interest income 1,153 1,104 1,068
Net operating income before operating expenses and impairment charges 5,208 5,029 4,803
Operating expenses (1,839) (1,796) (1,731)
Impairment charges (367) (410) (273)
Profit before income tax 3,002 2,823 2,799
Income tax expense (903) (848) (842)
Cash earnings for the year 2,099 1,975 1,957
Net cash earnings adjustments (10) (10) (10)
Net profit attributable to owners of Westpac Banking Corporation 2,089 1,965 1,947
$bn $bn $bn
Deposits and other borrowings 115.3 110.6 101.8
Net loans 157.5 153.4 146.4
Total assets 161.1 156.8 149.3
Total operating expenses to net operating income ratio 35.31% 35.71% 36.04%
2017 v 2016
Cash earnings of $2,099 million was $124 million, or 6% higher than 2016 from net operating income before operating
expenses and impairment charges growth of 4% and a 10% decline in impairment charges. The result was supported by
increased fee income, balance sheet growth and productivity gains.
Net interest
income up $130
million, 3%
lending growth of 3% was supported by growth in SME and targeted industries while commercial
property lending was lower from optimising risk return profile;
a 15% rise in transaction balances supported the 4% rise in deposits. Term deposit balances
declined following the migration of some customers to Private Wealth (in BTFG); and
net interest margin was little changed over the year. Asset spreads were higher following some
repricing, although these were offset by lower deposit spreads and higher wholesale funding costs.
Non-interest
income up $49
million, 4%
higher line fees from both portfolio growth and some repricing for facilities; and
fees were also supported by the growth in transaction balances and repricing.
Operating
expenses up
$43 million, 2%
business as usual cost increases were largely offset by efficiency gains from digitisation of processes
and streamlining in the division’s service model including specialist industry teams and more targeted
handling of customer service requests; and
increased investment spending and technology costs led to most of the increase.
Impairment
charges down
$43 million,
10%
lower impairments were principally due to improved collections processes for auto finance. This was
partly offset by increased provisions across the property, construction, mining and manufacturing
sectors, particularly in Queensland; and
credit quality remains sound, with total stressed assets to TCE lower. Auto delinquencies were
higher due to the changes in hardship reporting.
Divisional performance
2017 Westpac Group Annual Report 91
BT Financial Group (Australia)
BT Financial Group (Australia) (BTFG) is the Australian wealth management and insurance arm of the Westpac Group
providing a broad range of associated services. BTFG’s funds management operations include the manufacturing and
distribution of investment, superannuation, retirement products, wealth administration platforms, private banking, margin
lending and equities broking. BTFG’s insurance business covers the manufacturing and distribution of life, general and lenders
mortgage insurance. The division also uses third parties to manufacture certain general insurance products. In managing risk
across all insurance classes the division reinsures certain risks using external providers. BTFG operates a range of wealth,
funds management and financial advice brands and operates under the banking brands of Westpac, St.George, Bank of
Melbourne and BankSA for Private Wealth and Insurance.
In 2017 Westpac sold down its investment in BT Investment Management Limited (BTIM) from 29% to 10%. That sale led to a
change in the way the business is accounted for from being equity accounted to being reflected as an available-for-sale
investment. The profit on sale of shares in BTIM is not included in BTFG’s cash earnings results below.
Financial performance
$m 2017 2016 2015
Net interest income 537 486 434
Non-interest income 1,744 1,908 2,192
Net operating income before operating expenses and impairment charges 2,281 2,394 2,626
Operating expenses (1,176) (1,160) (1,286)
Impairment (charges)/benefit (4) - 4
Profit before income tax 1,101 1,234 1,344
Income tax expense (330) (366) (406)
Profit attributable to non-controlling interests - - (32)
Cash earnings for the year 771 868 906
Net cash earnings adjustments 160 (32) (23)
Net profit attributable to owners of Westpac Banking Corporation 931 836 883
$bn $bn $bn
Deposits and other borrowings 29.7 25.5 23.4
Net loans 20.1 18.6 17.2
Total assets 35.2 38.2 35.8
Funds Under Management (FUM)
1
53.1 48.4 46.3
Funds Under Administration (FUA) 138.3 130.8 121.9
Total operating expenses to net operating income ratio 51.56% 48.45% 48.97%
Cash earnings
$m 2017 2016 2015
Funds management business 435 520 560
Insurance 293 309 291
Capital and other 43 39 55
Total cash earnings 771 868 906
1
FUM represents Retail which includes Annuities, Retail Investment, Retirement Products and Retail Superannuation where risk profiles are selected
by investors and Investment Solutions through Advance (a multi manager of investment management companies).
2
92 2017 Westpac Group Annual Report
2017 v 2016
Cash earnings was 11% lower than full year 2016, impacted by a number of infrequent items totalling $129 million before tax.
The cash earnings impact of infrequent items (after tax) includes provisions for customer refunds and payments ($58 million),
revaluation loss on investments in boutique funds ($24 million) and lower revenue following the further sale of shares in BTIM
($10 million). The underlying business was flat over the year with volume growth partly offset by lower FUM and FUA margins,
lower Advice activity levels, higher insurance claims and increased regulatory and compliance costs.
Net interest
income up $51
million, 10%
balance sheet growth in Private Wealth, deposits up 16% and loans up 8%; and
net interest margin was up 13 basis points mostly due to repricing of certain mortgages and improved
term deposit spreads.
Non-interest
income down
$164 million,
9%
Funds Management contribution was down $151 million:
- infrequent items indicated above ($129 million);
- advice income was lower mostly from reduced activity ($33 million); and
- FUM and FUA revenue was higher with growth in average FUM and FUA (10% and 7%
respectively) offsetting lower margins from product mix changes, including the migration to
MySuper products. FUM and FUA net flows were $4 billion for the year.
insurance income was down $26 million (or 5%);
- general insurance income was lower ($33 million) mostly from higher claims concentrated in the
first half of the year;
- life insurance income was flat as the 10% growth in in-force premiums and improved lapses
were offset by higher claims; and
- LMI contribution was higher mostly due to the arrangements for loans with a LVR >90%.
partly offsetting this was improved returns on capital mostly related to lower hedging costs.
Operating
expenses up
$16 million, 1%
regulatory and compliance costs were $28 million higher over the year;
investment related spending was up from costs associated with the launch of Panorama; and
productivity benefits mostly offset these increases.
Funds management business
$m 2017 2016 2015
Net interest income 525 474 416
Non-interest income 1,183 1,334 1,663
Net operating income before operating expenses and impairment charges 1,708 1,808 2,079
Operating expenses (1,082) (1,067) (1,219)
Impairment (charges)/benefit (3) - 4
Profit before income tax 623 741 864
Income tax expense (188) (221) (272)
Profit attributable to non-controlling interests - - (32)
Cash earnings for the year 435 520 560
Net cash earnings adjustments 160 (32) (23)
Net profit attributable to owners of Westpac Banking Corporation 595 488 537
Total operating expenses to net operating income ratio 63.35% 59.02% 58.63%
Insurance business
The Insurance business result includes the Westpac and St.George Life Insurance, General Insurance and Lenders Mortgage
Insurance (LMI) businesses.
$m 2017 2016 2015
Net interest income 8 5 6
Non-interest income 499 525 488
Net operating income before operating expenses and impairment charges 507 530 494
Operating expenses (92) (88) (79)
Profit before income tax 415 442 415
Income tax expense (122) (133) (124)
Cash earnings for the year 293 309 291
Net cash earnings adjustments - - -
Net profit attributable to owners of Westpac Banking Corporation 293 309 291
Total operating expenses to net operating income ratio 18.15% 16.60% 15.99%
Divisional performance
2017 Westpac Group Annual Report 93
Westpac Institutional Bank
Westpac Institutional Bank (WIB) delivers a broad range of financial products and services to commercial, corporate,
institutional and government customers with connections to Australia and New Zealand. WIB operates through dedicated
industry relationship and specialist product teams, with expert knowledge in transactional banking, financial and debt capital
markets, specialised capital, and alternative investment solutions. Customers are supported throughout Australia as well as via
branches and subsidiaries located in New Zealand, the US, UK and Asia. WIB is also responsible for Westpac Pacific currently
providing a range of banking services in Fiji and PNG. WIB works in an integrated way with all the Group’s divisions in the
provision of more complex financial needs including foreign exchange and fixed interest solutions.
Financial performance
$m 2017 2016 2015
Net interest income 1,507 1,574 1,658
Non-interest income 1,706 1,536 1,578
Net operating income before operating expenses and impairment charges 3,213 3,110 3,236
Operating expenses (1,323) (1,347) (1,319)
Impairment (charges)/benefit (56) (177) 38
Profit before income tax 1,834 1,586 1,955
Income tax expense (523) (473) (590)
Profit attributable to non-controlling interests (7) (7) (8)
Cash earnings for the year 1,304 1,106 1,357
Net cash earnings adjustments - - -
Net profit attributable to owners of Westpac Banking Corporation 1,304 1,106 1,357
$bn $bn $bn
Deposits and other borrowings
1
89.4 88.4 80.3
Net loans 74.0 73.8 76.3
Total assets 102.9 110.4 127.3
Total operating expenses to net operating income ratio 41.18% 43.31% 40.76%
1
Refers to total customer deposits in this table and excludes Certificates of Deposit.
2017 v 2016
Cash earnings of $1,304 million, was $198 million or 18% higher compared to 2016, supported by higher customer and trading
income, disciplined expense management and lower impairments.
Net interest
income down
$67 million, 4%
average loan balances were lower over the year, which contributed to lower net interest income;
partly offset by
7 basis points improvement in net interest margin from the run-down in lower returning assets and
pricing disciplines.
Non-interest
income up $170
million, 11%
higher trading revenue across both fixed income and commodities;
customer revenue was higher reflecting some larger customer transactions; and
positive movement in derivative valuation adjustments.
Operating
expenses
down $24
million, 2%
disciplined operating expense management, productivity initiatives and lower investment in Asia
contributed to the 2% reduction in operating expenses.
Impairment
charges down
$121 million,
68%
asset quality was sound, with the ratio of impaired assets to TCE down 26 basis points following the
work-out and write-off of some larger facilities; and
the lower charge was partly due to higher impairment charges in 2016 with increased provisions for
the downgrade of a small number of large names.
2
94 2017 Westpac Group Annual Report
Westpac New Zealand
Westpac New Zealand is responsible for sales and service of banking, wealth and insurance products for consumers, business
and institutional customers in New Zealand. Westpac conducts its New Zealand banking business through two banks in New
Zealand: Westpac New Zealand Limited, which is incorporated in New Zealand and Westpac Banking Corporation (New
Zealand Branch), which is incorporated in Australia. Westpac New Zealand operates via an extensive network of branches and
ATMs across both the North and South Islands. Business and institutional customers are also served through relationship and
specialist product teams. Banking products are provided under the Westpac brand while insurance and wealth products are
provided under Westpac Life and BT brands, respectively. Westpac New Zealand also maintains its own infrastructure,
including technology, operations and treasury.
Financial performance
$m 2017 2016 2015
Net interest income 1,627 1,606 1,583
Non-interest income
1
479 482 493
Net operating income before operating expenses and impairment charges 2,106 2,088 2,076
Operating expenses
1
(903) (889) (844)
Impairment (charges)/benefit 72 (54) (44)
Profit before income tax 1,275 1,145 1,188
Income tax expense (359) (320) (322)
Profit attributable to non-controlling interests - - (3)
Cash earnings for the year 916 825 863
Net cash earnings adjustments (14) 2 -
Net profit attributable to owners of Westpac Banking Corporation 902 827 863
$bn $bn $bn
Deposits and other borrowings
2
53.7 54.9 47.3
Net loans 71.1 71.7 62.8
Total assets 81.3 82.1 71.5
Funds under management
3
7.7 7.1 5.9
Funds under administration
3
1.6 2.0 1.8
Total operating expenses to net operating income ratio 42.88% 42.58% 40.66%
1
Comparatives have been restated for the accounting change to the Westpac New Zealand credit card rewards scheme.
(2016: $33 million, 2015: $36 million).
2
Refers to total customer deposits in this table.
3
During 2017 $0.2 billion transferred from FUA to FUM.
Divisional performance
2017 Westpac Group Annual Report 95
2017 v 2016
Cash earnings up 11% to $916 million, with an impairment benefit of $72 million, from higher write-back and recoveries. Net
operating income before operating expenses and impairment charges was up 1%, with volume growth offset by margin decline.
Operating expenses were up 2% driven by investment in the division’s transformation program.
Net interest
income up $21
million, 1%
excluding foreign currency translation impacts, loan growth of 3% was mostly in mortgages, up 4%
with business lending 1% higher;
excluding foreign currency translation impacts, deposits growth of 2% was mostly in term deposits
(3%) with customers preferring higher rate term products over at call accounts;
net interest margin was 13 basis points lower mostly from increased deposit competition and
increased wholesale funding costs, partly offset by;
repricing of certain mortgages and business loans.
Non-interest
income down
$3 million,1%
increased investment income (from a 6% increase in FUM and FUA excluding foreign currency
translation impacts) and higher cards income were offset by higher insurance claims and lower
banking fees following the removal of some consumer fees.
Operating
expenses up
$14 million, 2%
the increase was principally due to costs of and investment in the division’s transformation program;
and
outside of this increase operating expenses were 3% lower through a range of productivity initiatives
including a net reduction of 20 branches, a 3% reduction in FTE, increased self-serve adoption and
the digitisation of more processes.
Impairment
benefit of $72m
compared to a
$54 million
impairment
charge.
asset quality remained sound with stressed assets to TCE reducing 48 basis points to 2.06%. The
decline was due to reduction of stress in the dairy sector (improving milk prices). Consumer 90+ day
delinquencies were a little higher but continue to be near historical lows; and
the impairment benefit reflects the work-out and write-back of a few large facilities combined with the
lower levels of stress.
2
96 2017 Westpac Group Annual Report
Group Businesses
This segment comprises:
Treasury, which is responsible for the management of the Group’s balance sheet including wholesale funding, capital and
management of liquidity. Treasury also manages the interest rate risk and foreign exchange risks inherent in the balance
sheet, including managing the mismatch between Group assets and liabilities. Treasury’s earnings are primarily sourced
from managing the Group’s balance sheet and interest rate risk, (excluding Westpac New Zealand) within set risk limits;
Group Technology
1
, which comprises functions for the Australian businesses is responsible for technology strategy and
architecture, infrastructure and operations, applications development and business integration;
Core Support
2
, which comprises functions performed centrally, including Australian banking operations, property services,
strategy, finance, risk, compliance, legal and human resources; and
Group Businesses also includes: earnings on capital not allocated to divisions, accounting entries for certain intra-group
transactions that facilitate the presentation of the performance of the Group’s operating segments, earnings from non-core
asset sales, earnings and costs associated with the Group’s fintech investments, and certain other head office items such
as centrally raised provisions.
Financial performance
$m 2017 2016 2015
Net interest income 469 582 426
Non-interest income (32) 8 66
Net operating income before operating expenses and impairment charges 437 590 492
Operating expenses (527) (469) (378)
Impairment benefits 43 9 -
Profit before income tax (47) 130 114
Income tax (expense)/benefit (85) (58) 13
Profit attributable to non-controlling interests - (8) (15)
Cash earnings for the year (132) 64 112
Net cash earnings adjustments (92) (221) 341
Net profit attributable to owners of Westpac Banking Corporation (224) (157) 453
2017 v 2016
Cash earnings decreased by $196 million from lower Treasury revenue, increased expenses and a higher tax expense.
Net operating
income down
$153 million,
26%
net interest income decreased $113 million largely from lower Treasury revenue related to interest
rate risk management; and
non-interest income decreased $40 million primarily due to the impact of exchange rate movements
on the hedging of New Zealand earnings.
Operating
expenses up
$58 million,
12%
increase in operating expenses primarily from higher expenses associated with the Group’s fintech
investments and higher regulatory and compliance costs.
Impairment
benefits up $34
million
impairment benefit increased $34 million due to a reduction to the centrally held economic overlay
provisions, largely related to the mining sector. This reduction offsets provisions raised in divisions.
Tax and non-
controlling
interests up $19
million, 29%
tax and non-controlling interests increased $19 million, as 2016 benefitted from the finalisation of
prior period taxation matters, and hybrid distributions (not deductible for tax purposes) were also
higher in the current year.
1
Costs are fully allocated to other divisions in the Group.
2
Costs are partially allocated to other divisions in the Group, with costs attributed to enterprise activity retained in Group Businesses.
Risk and risk management
2017 Westpac Group Annual Report 97
Risk factors
Our business is subject to risks that can adversely impact our financial performance, financial condition and future
performance. If any of the following risks occur, our business, prospects, reputation, financial performance or financial condition
could be materially adversely affected, with the result that the trading price of our securities could decline and as a security
holder you could lose all, or part, of your investment. You should carefully consider the risks described and the other
information in this Annual Report before investing in our securities. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only
ones we face. Additional risks and uncertainties that we are unaware of, or that we currently deem to be immaterial, may also
become important factors that affect us.
Risks relating to our business
Our businesses are highly regulated and we could be adversely affected by changes in laws, regulations or regulatory
policy
As a financial institution, we are subject to detailed laws and regulations in each of the jurisdictions in which we operate or
obtain funding, including Australia, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, the United States and various jurisdictions in Asia. We
are also supervised by a number of different regulatory and supervisory authorities which have broad administrative powers
over our businesses. In Australia, the relevant regulatory authorities include the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority
(APRA), Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA), Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), Australian Securities
Exchange (ASX), Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC), the Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis
Centre (AUSTRAC) and the Australian Taxation Office (ATO). The Reserve Bank of New Zealand (RBNZ) and the Financial
Markets Authority (FMA) have supervisory oversight of our New Zealand operations. In the United States, we are subject to
supervision and regulation by the US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), the Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and the US Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC). In the United Kingdom, we are subject to supervision and regulation by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and the
Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA). In Asia, we are subject to supervision and regulation by local authorities, including the
Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS), the China Banking Regulatory Commission (CBRC) and the Hong Kong Monetary
Authority (HKMA). In other jurisdictions in which we operate, including various Pacific countries, we are also required to comply
with relevant requirements of the local regulatory bodies.
The Group’s business, reputation, prospects, financial performance and financial condition could all be affected by changes to
law and regulation, changes to policies and changes in the supervisory activities of our regulators.
As with other financial services providers, we face increasing supervision and regulation in most of the jurisdictions in which we
operate or obtain funding particularly in the areas of funding, liquidity, capital adequacy, tax, anti-money laundering and
counter-terrorism financing, conduct, competition and consumer protection (including in the design and distribution of financial
products), remuneration, privacy, data access, prudential regulation, anti-bribery and corruption, and economic and trade
sanctions.
Regulatory changes could impact us in a number of ways. For example, new regulation could require us to have increased
levels of liquidity and higher levels of, and better quality, capital and funding. Regulatory change could also result in restrictions
on how we operate our business by imposing restrictions on the types of businesses we can conduct, require us or our
competitors to change our business models or require us to amend our corporate structure.
If regulatory change has any such effect, it could adversely affect one or more of our businesses, restrict our flexibility, require
us to incur substantial costs and could impact the profitability of one or more of our business lines. Any such costs or
restrictions could adversely affect our business, prospects, financial performance or financial condition.
Regulation may also affect how we provide products and services to our customers. New laws and regulations could restrict our
ability to provide products and services to certain customers (including by imposing regulatory limits on certain types of lending
and on lending to certain customer segments), require us to alter our product and service offerings and restrict our ability to set
prices for certain products and services. These types of changes could affect our profitability by adversely affecting our ability to
maintain or increase margins and fees. This could occur because a regulation seeks to place a cap on the price of a product or
service we provide, or because, in response to new regulation, we increase the price we charge for a product or service. This
price increase could lead to customers seeking out alternative products or services, whether within the Group or with a
competitor (including customers switching residential mortgages from interest-only to principal and interest).
There are numerous sources of regulatory change that could affect our business. In some cases, changes to regulation are
driven by international bodies. For example, in December 2010, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS)
announced a revised global regulatory framework known as Basel III. Basel III, among other things, increased the required
quality and quantity of capital held by banks and introduced new standards for the management of liquidity risk. The BCBS
continues to refine this framework, while, in July 2017, APRA took steps to implement the next wave of capital requirements for
banks by clarifying its expectations for banks to hold ‘unquestionably strong’ levels of capital. In other cases, authorities in the
various jurisdictions in which we operate or obtain funding may propose regulatory change for financial institutions. Examples of
proposed regulatory change that could impact us include changes to accounting and reporting standards, derivatives reform
and changes to tax legislation (including dividend imputation). Further details on regulatory changes that may impact Westpac
(including the Basel III framework) are set out in ‘Significant developments’ in Section 1.
2
98 2017 Westpac Group Annual Report
Further changes may occur driven by policy, prudential or political factors. Westpac is currently operating in an environment
where there is increased political scrutiny of the Australian financial services sector. This environment has served to increase
the pace and scope of regulatory change. For example, as part of the Federal Government’s 2017 Budget, a series of reforms
impacting the banking sector were announced, including the introduction of the Bank Executive Accountability Regime (BEAR)
and a new levy on ADIs with liabilities of at least A$100 billion. Further details about the Bank Levy and BEAR are set out in
‘Significant developments’ in Section 1.
Legislation introduced in one jurisdiction may lead to other governments seeking to introduce similar legislation in their
jurisdiction. This was demonstrated by the South Australian Government’s proposal to introduce a levy on the banks that are
subject to the Federal Government’s Bank Levy. While it is unclear if the South Australian levy will come into effect, it is
possible that other governments may attempt to introduce their own version of the Bank Levy or similar legislation in the future.
As part of the heightened political scrutiny on the financial services sector, the Australian Government, other regulators and
parliamentary bodies are increasingly initiating reviews and inquiries (such as the Financial System Inquiry, the House of
Representatives Standing Committee on Economics’ ongoing ‘Review of Australia’s Four Major Banks’ and the Senate
Economics References Committee’s inquiry into consumer protection in the banking, insurance and financial sector, the
Productivity Commission Inquiry into Competition in the Australian Financial System and the ACCC inquiry into residential
mortgage pricing). These reviews and commissions of inquiry could lead to substantial regulatory change or investigations,
which could have a material impact on our business, prospects, financial performance or financial condition.
It is also possible that governments or regulators in jurisdictions in which we operate or obtain funding might revise their
application of existing regulatory policies that apply to, or impact, our business (including by instituting macro-prudential limits
on lending). Regulators or governments may take this action for a variety of reasons, including for reasons relating to national
interest and/or systemic stability.
Regulatory changes and the timing of their introduction continue to evolve and we manage our businesses in the context of
regulatory uncertainty and complexity. The nature and impact of future changes are not predictable and are beyond our control.
Regulatory compliance and the management of regulatory change are an important part of our planning processes. We expect
that we will be required to continue to invest significantly in compliance and the management and implementation of regulatory
change and, at the same time, significant management attention and resources will be required to update existing, or
implement new, processes to comply with new regulations. Furthermore, the challenge in managing regulatory change may be
heightened by multiple jurisdictions seeking to adopt a coordinated approach to the introduction of new regulations. Where
these jurisdictions elect not to adopt regulation in a uniform manner across each jurisdiction, this may result in conflicts
between the specific requirements of the different jurisdictions in which we operate.
For further information refer to ‘Significant developments’ in Section 1 and the sections ‘Critical accounting assumptions and
estimates’ and ‘Future developments in accounting standards’ in Note 1 to the financial statements.
Our businesses are highly regulated and we could be adversely affected by failing to comply with laws, regulations or
regulatory policy
We are responsible for ensuring that we comply with all applicable legal and regulatory requirements (including accounting
standards) and industry codes of practice in the jurisdictions in which we operate or obtain funding, as well as meeting our
ethical standards.
The Group is subject to compliance risk, which is the risk of legal or regulatory sanction or financial or reputational loss, arising
from our failure to abide by the compliance obligations required of us. This risk is exacerbated by the increasing complexity and
volume of global regulation. Compliance risk can also arise where we interpret our regulatory obligations, compliance
requirements and rights (including tax incentives) differently to our regulators or a court.
The Group’s failure, or suspected failure, to comply with a compliance obligation could lead to a regulator commencing an
investigation into the Group or taking other administrative or enforcement action against us. In addition, the failure or alleged
failure of our competitors to comply with their compliance obligations could lead to increased regulatory scrutiny across the
financial services sector.
In many cases, our regulators have broad administrative and enforcement powers. For example, under the Banking Act 1959
(Cth), APRA can, in certain circumstances, investigate our affairs and/or issue a direction to us (such as a direction to comply
with a prudential requirement, to conduct an audit, to remove a Director, executive officer or employee or not to undertake
transactions). Other regulators also have the power to investigate, including looking into past conduct.
The powers exercisable by our regulators may also be expanded in the future. For example, the Australian Government has
consulted on a proposal to provide ASIC with a product intervention power and has also consulted on expanding ASIC’s
powers to ban individuals working in the financial services sector. Further details are set out in ‘Significant developments’ in
Section 1.
Changes may also occur in the oversight approach of regulators which could result in a regulator exercising its enforcement
powers rather than adopting a more consultative approach.
Risk and risk management
2017 Westpac Group Annual Report 99
In recent years, there have been significant increases in the nature and scale of regulatory investigations, enforcement actions
and the quantum of fines issued by global regulators. The nature of regulatory activity can be wide-ranging and may result in
litigation, fines, penalties, reputational damage, revocation, suspension or variation of conditions of relevant regulatory licences
(including potentially requiring us to change or adjust our business model) or other enforcement or administrative action or
agreements (such as enforceable undertakings).
For example:
In April 2016, ASIC commenced civil proceedings against Westpac in the Federal Court of Australia, alleging certain
misconduct in relation to the setting of the BBSW in the period April 2010 to June 2012, including market manipulation and
unconscionable conduct. Westpac is defending the proceedings;
On 1 March 2017, ASIC commenced civil proceedings against Westpac in the Federal Court of Australia in relation to
certain home loan responsible lending practices (including interest only lending). Westpac is defending the proceedings;
and
On 15 March 2017, Westpac entered into an enforceable undertaking with ASIC following ASIC’s industry-wide
investigation into wholesale Spot Foreign Exchange (FX) trading activity between January 2008 and June 2013. As part of
the enforceable undertaking, Westpac undertook, amongst other things, to continue to progress its program of
strengthening its policies and processes in its Spot FX trading business, with input from an independent expert.
Furthermore, regulatory activity may result in Westpac being exposed to the risk of litigation brought by third parties (including
through class action proceedings). The outcome of such litigation (including class action proceedings) may be payment of
compensation to third parties and/or further remediation activities. In addition, action taken in one jurisdiction may prompt
similar action to be taken in another jurisdiction.
During the year ended 30 September 2017, Westpac has responded to requirements, compulsory notices and requests for
information from its regulators as part of both industry-wide and Westpac-specific reviews, including in relation to matters
involving sales practices, responsible lending, reverse mortgages, interest only loans, the provision of financial advice and
ongoing advice service fees.
Regulatory investigations, litigation, fines, penalties, revocation, suspension or variation of conditions of relevant regulatory
licences or other enforcement or administrative action or agreements (such as enforceable undertakings) could, either
individually or in aggregate with other regulatory action, adversely affect our business, reputation, prospects, financial
performance or financial condition.
The failure to comply with financial crime obligations could have an adverse effect on our business and reputation
The Group is subject to anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing laws, anti-bribery and corruption laws and
economic and trade sanctions laws in the jurisdictions in which it operates. These laws can be complex, and are undergoing
change in a number of jurisdictions. Furthermore, in recent years there has been increased focus on compliance with these
obligations, with regulators around the globe commencing large-scale investigations and taking enforcement action where they
have identified non-compliance (often seeking significant monetary penalties).
While the Group has systems, policies, processes and controls in place that are designed to manage its financial crime
obligations, these may not always be effective. If we fail to comply with these obligations, we could face regulatory action such
as litigation, fines, penalties and the revocation, suspension or variation of licence conditions. Non-compliance could also lead
to litigation commenced by third parties (including class action proceedings) and cause reputational damage. These actions
could, either individually or in aggregate, adversely affect our business, reputation, prospects, financial performance or financial
condition.
Reputational damage could harm our business and prospects
Our ability to attract and retain customers and our prospects could be adversely affected if our reputation is damaged.
Reputation risk is the risk of loss of reputation, stakeholder confidence or public trust and standing. It arises where there are
differences between stakeholders’ current and emerging perceptions, beliefs and expectations and our current and planned
activities, processes, performance and behaviours.
During the full year ended 30 September 2017, we commenced a broader program to reduce complexity and resolve prior
issues that have the potential to impact customers and reputation. As part of these reviews, we are strengthening our
processes and controls in certain businesses and we have identified some prior instances where we are now taking action to
put things right so that our customers are not at a disadvantage from certain past practices. For further information about these
and other internal reviews, refer to Note 31 to the Financial Statements.
There are various potential sources of reputational damage, including failure to effectively manage risks in accordance with our
risk management frameworks, potential conflicts of interest, failure to comply with legal and regulatory requirements, failure to
meet our market disclosure obligations, regulatory investigations into past conduct, adverse findings from regulatory reviews
(including Westpac-specific and industry-wide reviews), making inaccurate public statements, environmental, social and ethical
issues, engagement and conduct of external suppliers, failure to comply with anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism
2
100 2017 Westpac Group Annual Report
financing laws, anti-bribery and corruption laws, economic and trade sanctions legislation or privacy laws, litigation, failure of
information security systems, improper sales and trading practices, failure to comply with personnel and supplier policies,
improper conduct of companies in which we hold strategic investments, technology failures and security breaches and
inadequate record keeping which may prevent Westpac from demonstrating that a past decision was appropriate at the time it
was made.
Westpac may incur reputational damage where one of its practices fails to meet evolving community expectations. As these
expectations may exceed the standard required in order to comply with the law, Westpac may incur reputational damage even
where it has met its legal obligations. A divergence between community expectations and Westpac’s practices could arise in a
number of ways, including in relation to our product and services disclosure practices, the features and benefits available under
our products, pricing policies and use of data. Our reputation could also be adversely affected by the actions of the financial
services industry in general or from the actions of our competitors, customers, suppliers and other counterparties. Furthermore,
the risk of reputational damage may be heightened by the increasing use of social media.
Failure, or perceived failure, to appropriately address issues that could or do give rise to reputational risk could also impact the
regulatory change agenda, give rise to additional legal risk, subject us to regulatory investigations, regulatory enforcement
actions, fines and penalties or litigation brought by third parties (including class actions), require us to remediate and
compensate customers and incur remediation costs or harm our reputation among customers, investors and the marketplace.
This could lead to loss of business which could adversely affect our business, prospects, financial performance or financial
condition.
We could suffer information security risks, including cyberattacks
The proliferation of new technologies, the increasing use of the internet and telecommunications to conduct financial
transactions and the growing sophistication and activities of attackers (including organised crime and state-sponsored actors)
have resulted in increased information security risks for major financial institutions such as Westpac and our external service
providers.
While Westpac has systems in place to protect against, detect and respond to cyberattacks, these systems may not always be
effective and there can be no assurance that we will not suffer losses from cyberattacks or other information security breaches
in the future.
Our operations rely on the secure processing, storage and transmission of information on our computer systems and networks,
and the systems and networks of external suppliers. Although we implement measures to protect the security, integrity and
confidentiality of our information, there is a risk that the computer systems, software and networks on which we rely may be
subject to security breaches, unauthorised access, malicious software, external attacks or internal breaches that could have an
adverse impact on our confidential information or that of our customers and counterparties.
Major banks in other jurisdictions have suffered security breaches from sophisticated cyberattacks. Our external service
providers or other parties that facilitate our business activities (such as vendors, exchanges, clearing houses, central
depositories and financial intermediaries) are also subject to the risk of cyberattacks. Any such security breach could result in
the loss of customers and business opportunities, significant disruption to Westpac’s operations, misappropriation of Westpac’s
confidential information and/or that of our customers and damage to Westpac’s computers or systems and/or those of our
customers. Such a security breach could also result in reputational damage, claims for compensation and regulatory
investigations and penalties, which could adversely affect our business, prospects, financial performance, or financial condition.
Our risk and exposure to such threats remains heightened because of the evolving nature of technology, Westpac’s
prominence within the financial services industry, the prominence of our customers (including government, mining and health)
and our plans to continue to improve and expand our internet and mobile banking infrastructure.
We could suffer losses due to technology failures
The reliability, integrity and security of our information and technology is crucial in supporting our customers’ banking
requirements and meeting our compliance obligations and our regulators’ expectations.
While the Group has a number of processes in place to provide for and monitor the availability and recovery of our systems,
there is a risk that our information and technology systems might fail to operate properly or become disabled as a result of
events that are wholly or partially beyond our control. If we incur a technology failure we may fail to meet a compliance
obligation, which could result in a regulator commencing an investigation and/or taking administrative or enforcement action
against us.
Further, in order to continue to deliver new products and services to customers and comply with our regulatory obligations, we
need to regularly renew and enhance our technology. We are constantly managing technology projects including projects to
consolidate technology platforms, simplify and enhance our technology and operations environment, improve productivity and
provide for a better customer experience. Failure to implement these projects or manage associated change effectively could
result in cost overruns, unrealised productivity, operational instability or reputational damage. In turn, this could place us at a
competitive disadvantage and adversely affect our financial performance.
Risk and risk management
2017 Westpac Group Annual Report 101
Adverse credit and capital market conditions or depositor preferences may significantly affect our ability to meet
funding and liquidity needs and may increase our cost of funding
We rely on deposits, and credit and capital markets, to fund our business and as a source of liquidity. Our liquidity and costs of
obtaining funding are related to credit and capital market conditions.
Global credit and capital markets can experience periods of extreme volatility, disruption and decreased liquidity as was
demonstrated during the Global Financial Crisis. While there have now been extended periods of stability in these markets, the
environment remains unpredictable. The main risks we face are damage to market confidence, changes to the access and cost
of funding and a slowing in global activity or other impacts on entities with whom we do business.
As of 30 September 2017, approximately 30% of our total funding originated from domestic and international wholesale
markets. Of this, around 62% was sourced outside Australia and New Zealand. Customer deposits provide around 62% of total
funding. Customer deposits held by Westpac are comprised of both term deposits which can be withdrawn after a certain
period of time and at call deposits which can be withdrawn at any time.
A shift in investment preferences could result in deposit withdrawals by customers which could increase our need for funding
from other, potentially less stable, or more expensive, forms of funding.
If market conditions deteriorate due to economic, financial, political or other reasons, there may also be a loss of confidence in
bank deposits and we could experience unexpected deposit withdrawals. In this situation our funding costs may be adversely
affected and our liquidity and our funding and lending activities may be constrained.
If our current sources of funding prove to be insufficient, we may be forced to seek alternative financing. The availability of such
alternative financing, and the terms on which it may be available, will depend on a variety of factors, including prevailing market
conditions, the availability of credit, our credit ratings and credit market capacity. Even if available, these alternatives may be
more expensive or on unfavourable terms, which could adversely affect our financial performance, liquidity, capital resources or
financial condition. There is no assurance that we will be able to obtain adequate funding and do so at acceptable prices, nor
that we will be able to recover any additional costs.
If Westpac is unable to source appropriate funding, we may also be forced to reduce our lending or begin selling liquid
securities. Such actions may adversely impact our business, prospects, liquidity, capital resources, financial performance or
financial condition.
Westpac enters into collateralised derivative obligations, which may require Westpac to post additional collateral based on
movements in market rates, which has the potential to adversely affect Westpac’s liquidity or ability to use derivative obligations
to hedge its interest rate, currency and other financial instrument risks.
For a more detailed description of liquidity risk, refer to ‘Funding and liquidity risk management’ in Note 22 to the financial
statements.
Sovereign risk may destabilise financial markets adversely
Sovereign risk is the risk that foreign governments will default on their debt obligations, will be unable to refinance their debts
as they fall due or will nationalise parts of their economy including assets of financial institutions such as Westpac. Sovereign
defaults could negatively impact the value of our holdings of high quality liquid assets. There may also be a cascading effect to
other markets and countries, the consequences of which, while difficult to predict, may be similar to or worse than those
experienced during the Global Financial Crisis. Such an event could destabilise global financial markets adversely affecting our
liquidity, financial performance or financial condition.
Failure to maintain credit ratings could adversely affect our cost of funds, liquidity, competitive position and access to
capital markets
Credit ratings are independent opinions on our creditworthiness. Our credit ratings can affect the cost and availability of our
funding from capital markets and other funding sources and they may be important to customers or counterparties when
evaluating our products and services. Therefore, maintaining high credit ratings is important.
The credit ratings assigned to us by rating agencies are based on an evaluation of a number of factors, including our financial
strength, the quality of our governance, structural considerations regarding the Australian financial system and the credit rating
of the Australian Government. A credit rating downgrade could be driven by a downgrade of the Australian Government, the
occurrence of one or more of the other risks identified in this section or by other events including changes to the methodologies
used by the rating agencies to determine ratings.
A downgrade or series of downgrades to our credit ratings could have an adverse effect on our cost of funds and related
margins, collateral requirements, liquidity, competitive position and our access to capital markets. The extent and nature of
these impacts would depend on various factors, including the extent of any ratings change, whether our ratings differ among
agencies (split ratings) and whether any ratings changes also impact our competitors or the sector.
2
102 2017 Westpac Group Annual Report
A systemic shock in relation to the Australian, New Zealand or other financial systems could have adverse
consequences for Westpac or its customers or counterparties that would be difficult to predict and respond to
There is a risk that a major systemic shock could occur that causes an adverse impact on the Australian, New Zealand or other
financial systems.
As outlined above, during the past decade the financial services industry and capital markets have been, and may continue to
be, adversely affected by market volatility, global economic conditions, geopolitical instability (such as threats of or actual
conflict occurring around the world) and political developments (such as Brexit). A shock to one of the major global economies
could again result in currency and interest rate fluctuations and operational disruptions that negatively impact the Group.
Any such market and economic disruptions could adversely affect financial institutions such as Westpac because consumer
and business spending may decrease, unemployment may rise and demand for the products and services we provide may
decline, thereby reducing our earnings. These conditions may also affect the ability of our borrowers to repay their loans or our
counterparties to meet their obligations, causing us to incur higher credit losses and affect investors’ willingness to invest in the
Group. These events could also result in the undermining of confidence in the financial system, reducing liquidity, impairing our
access to funding and impairing our customers and counterparties and their businesses. If this were to occur, our business,
prospects, financial performance or financial condition could be adversely affected.
The nature and consequences of any such event are difficult to predict and there can be no certainty that we could respond
effectively to any such event.
Declines in asset markets could adversely affect our operations or profitability
Declines in Australian, New Zealand or other asset markets, including equity, residential and commercial property and other
asset markets, could adversely affect our operations and profitability.
Declining asset prices also impact our wealth management business. Earnings in our wealth management business are, in
part, dependent on asset values because we typically receive fees based on the value of securities and/or assets held or
managed. A decline in asset prices could negatively impact the earnings of this business.
Declining asset prices could also impact customers and counterparties and the value of security (including residential and
commercial property) we hold against loans and derivatives. This may impact our ability to recover amounts owing to us if
customers or counterparties were to default. It may also affect our level of provisioning which in turn impacts our profitability
and financial condition.
Our business is substantially dependent on the Australian and New Zealand economies
Our revenues and earnings are dependent on economic activity and the level of financial services our customers require. In
particular, lending is dependent on various factors including economic growth, business investment, business and consumer
sentiment, levels of employment, interest rates, asset prices and trade flows in the countries in which we operate.
We conduct the majority of our business in Australia and New Zealand and, consequently, our performance is influenced by the
level and cyclical nature of lending in these countries. These factors are in turn impacted by both domestic and international
economic conditions, natural disasters and political events. A significant decrease in Australian and New Zealand housing
valuations could adversely impact our home lending activities because borrowers with loans in excess of their property value
show a higher propensity to default. In the event of defaults our security may be eroded, causing us to incur higher credit
losses. The demand for our home lending products may also decline due to adverse changes in tax legislation (such as
changes to tax rates, concessions or deductions), regulatory requirements or other buyer concerns about decreases in values.
Adverse changes to economic and business conditions in Australia and New Zealand and other countries such as China, India
and Japan, could also adversely affect the Australian economy and our customers. In particular, due to the current economic
relationship between Australia and China, particularly in the mining and resources sectors, a slowdown in China’s economic
growth could negatively impact the Australian economy. Changes in commodity prices, Chinese government policies and
broader economic conditions could, in turn, result in reduced demand for our products and services and affect the ability of our
borrowers to repay their loans. If this were to occur, it could negatively impact our business, prospects, financial performance or
financial condition.
An increase in defaults in credit exposures could adversely affect our liquidity, capital resources, financial
performance or financial condition
Credit risk is the risk of financial loss where a customer or counterparty fails to meet their financial obligations to Westpac. It is
a significant risk and arises primarily from our lending activities.
We establish provisions for credit impairment based on current information. If economic conditions deteriorate, some customers
and/or counterparties could experience higher levels of financial stress and we may experience a significant increase in
defaults and write-offs, and be required to increase our provisioning. Such events would diminish available capital and could
adversely affect our liquidity, capital resources, financial performance or financial condition.
Risk and risk management
2017 Westpac Group Annual Report 103
Credit risk also arises from certain derivative, clearing and settlement contracts we enter into, and from our dealings with, and
holdings of, debt securities issued by other banks, financial institutions, companies, clearing houses, governments and
government bodies, the financial conditions of which may be affected to varying degrees by economic conditions in global
financial markets.
For a discussion of our risk management procedures, including the management of credit risk, refer to the ‘Risk management’
section and Note 22 to the financial statements.
We face intense competition in all aspects of our business
The financial services industry is highly competitive. We compete, both domestically and internationally, with retail and
commercial banks, asset managers, investment banking firms, brokerage firms, other financial service firms and businesses in
other industries with emerging financial services aspirations. This includes specialist competitors that may not be subject to the
same capital and regulatory requirements and therefore may be able to operate more efficiently. Digital technologies are
changing consumer behaviour and the competitive environment. The use of digital channels by customers to conduct their
banking continues to rise and emerging competitors are increasingly utilising new technologies and seeking to disrupt existing
business models, including in relation to digital payment services. The Group faces competition from established providers of
financial services as well as from banking businesses developed by non-financial services companies.
If we are unable to compete effectively in our various businesses and markets, our market share may decline. Increased
competition may also adversely affect us by diverting business to our competitors or creating pressure to lower margins and
fees.
Increased competition for deposits could also increase our cost of funding and lead us to seek access to other types of funding
or reduce lending. We rely on bank deposits to fund a significant portion of our balance sheet and deposits have been a
relatively stable source of funding. We compete with banks and other financial services firms for such deposits. To the extent
that we are not able to successfully compete for deposits, we would be forced to rely more heavily on other, potentially less
stable or more expensive forms of funding, or reduce lending.
We are also dependent on our ability to offer products and services that match evolving customer preferences. If we are not
successful in developing or introducing new products and services or responding or adapting to changes in customer
preferences and habits, we may lose customers to our competitors. This could adversely affect our business, prospects,
financial performance or financial condition.
For more detail on how we address competitive pressures refer to ‘Competition’ in Section 1.
We could suffer losses due to market volatility
We are exposed to market risk as a consequence of our trading activities in financial markets, our defined benefit plan and
through the asset and liability management of our financial position. This is the risk of an adverse impact on earnings resulting
from changes in market factors, such as foreign exchange rates, commodity prices, equity prices and interest rates including
the potential for negative interest rates. This includes interest rate risk in the banking book, such as the risk to interest income
from a mismatch between the duration of assets and liabilities that arises in the normal course of business activities. If we were
to suffer substantial losses due to any market volatility it may adversely affect our business, prospects, liquidity, capital
resources, financial performance or financial condition. For a discussion of our risk management procedures, including the
management of market risk, refer to the ‘Risk management’ section.
We could suffer losses due to operational risks
Operational risk is the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, people and systems or from external
events. It also includes, among other things, technology risk, model risk and outsourcing risk, as well as the risk of business
disruption due to external events such as natural disasters, environmental hazard, damage to critical utilities, and targeted
activism and protest activity. While we have policies, processes and controls in place to manage these risks, these may not
always be effective.
If a process or control is ineffective, it could result in an adverse outcome for Westpac’s customers. For example, a process
breakdown could result in a customer not receiving a product on the terms and conditions, or at the pricing, they agreed to. In
addition, inadequate record keeping may prevent Westpac from demonstrating that a past decision was appropriate at the time
it was made. If this was to occur, Westpac may incur significant costs in paying refunds and compensation to customers, as
well as remediating any underlying process breakdown. These types of failure may also result in increased regulatory scrutiny,
with a regulator potentially commencing an investigation and/or taking other enforcement, administrative or supervisory action.
We could incur losses from fraudulent applications for loans or from incorrect or fraudulent payments and settlements,
particularly real-time payments. Fraudulent conduct can also emerge from external parties seeking to access the bank’s
systems and customers’ accounts. If systems, procedures and protocols for managing fraud fail, or are ineffective, they could
lead to losses which could adversely affect our business, prospects, reputation, financial performance or financial condition.
As a financial services organisation, Westpac is heavily reliant on the use of data and models in the conduct of its business
(including in the calculation of risk-weighted assets). We are therefore exposed to model risk, being the risk of loss arising
because of errors or inadequacies in data or a model, or in the control and use of the model.
2
104 2017 Westpac Group Annual Report
Westpac relies on a number of suppliers, both in Australia and overseas, to provide services to it and its customers. Failure by
these suppliers to deliver services as required could disrupt services and adversely impact Westpac’s operations, profitability or
reputation.
Operational risks can directly impact our reputation and result in financial losses (including through decreased demand for our
products and services) which would adversely affect our financial performance or financial condition.
The Group (and individual entities within the Group) may, from time to time, be involved in legal proceedings (including class
action proceedings), regulatory actions or arbitration arising from the conduct of their business. These may, either individually
or in aggregate, adversely affect the Group’s business, operations, prospects or financial condition. Such matters are subject to
many uncertainties (for example, the outcome may not be able to be predicted accurately) and the Group may be required to
pay money such as damages, fines, penalties or legal costs. The Group’s material contingent liabilities are described in Note
31 to the financial statements. There is a risk that these contingent liabilities may be larger than anticipated or that additional
litigation or other contingent liabilities may arise.
For a discussion of our risk management procedures, including the management of operational risk, refer to the ‘Risk
management’ section.
We could suffer losses due to conduct risk
Conduct risk is the risk that our provision of services and products results in unsuitable or unfair outcomes for our stakeholders
or undermines market integrity. This risk can manifest itself through the poor conduct of our employees, contractors and
external service providers. In addition, conduct risk could occur through the provision of products and services to our customers
that do not meet their needs or do not support market integrity. This could occur through a failure to meet professional
obligations to specific clients (including fiduciary and suitability requirements), poor product design and implementation, selling
products and services outside of customer target markets or a failure to adequately provide the products or services we had
agreed to provide a customer. While we have policies and processes that are designed to manage poor conduct outcomes,
these policies and processes may not always be effective. The failure of these policies and processes could result in financial
losses and reputational damage and this could adversely affect our business, prospects, financial performance or financial
condition.
We could suffer losses due to failures in governance or risk management strategies
We have implemented risk management strategies, frameworks and internal controls involving processes and procedures
intended to identify, monitor and manage risks including liquidity risk, credit risk, equity risk, market risk (such as interest rate
and foreign exchange risk), compliance risk, conduct risk, insurance risk, sustainability risk, related entity (contagion) risk and
operational risk, all of which may impact the Group’s reputation.
However, there are inherent limitations with any risk management framework as there may exist, or emerge in the future, risks
that we have not anticipated or identified. The effectiveness of risk management frameworks is also connected to the
establishment and maintenance of a sound risk management culture.
If any of our governance or risk management processes and procedures prove ineffective or inadequate or are otherwise not
appropriately implemented, we could suffer unexpected losses and reputational damage which could adversely affect our
business, prospects, financial performance or financial condition.
For a discussion of our risk management procedures, refer to the ‘Risk management’ section.
Climate change may have adverse effects on our business
We and our customers may be adversely affected by the physical risks of climate change, including increases in temperatures,
sea levels, and the frequency and severity of adverse climatic events including fires, storms, floods, and droughts. These
changes may directly impact us and our customers through reputational damage, environmental factors, insurance risk, and an
increase in defaults in credit exposures.
Initiatives to mitigate or respond to adverse impacts of climate change may in turn impact market and asset prices, economic
activity, and customer behaviour, particularly in geographic locations and industry sectors adversely affected by these changes.
Failure to effectively manage these transition risks could adversely affect our reputation, business, prospects, financial
performance or financial condition.
We could suffer losses due to environmental factors
We and our customers operate businesses and hold assets in a diverse range of geographic locations. Any significant
environmental change or external event (including fire, storm, flood, earthquake, pandemic, civil unrest or terrorism events) in
any of these locations has the potential to disrupt business activities, impact on our operations, damage property and otherwise
affect the value of assets held in the affected locations and our ability to recover amounts owing to us. In addition, such an
event could have an adverse impact on economic activity, consumer and investor confidence, or the levels of volatility in
financial markets, all of which could adversely affect our business, prospects, financial performance or financial condition.
Risk and risk management
2017 Westpac Group Annual Report 105
We could suffer losses due to insurance risk
We have exposure to insurance risk in our life insurance, general insurance and lenders mortgage insurance businesses, which
may adversely affect our business, operations or financial condition.
Insurance risk is the risk of mis-estimation of the expected cost of insured events, volatility in the number or severity of insured
events, and mis-estimation of the cost of incurred claims.
In the life insurance business, risk arises primarily through mortality (death) and morbidity (illness and injury) risks, the costs of
claims relating to those risks being greater than was anticipated when pricing those risks and policy lapses.
In the general insurance business, insurance risk arises mainly through environmental factors (including storms, floods and
bushfires) and other calamities, such as earthquakes, tsunamis and volcanic activity, as well as general variability in home and
contents insurance claim amounts. The frequency and severity of external events such as natural disasters is difficult to predict
and it is possible that the amounts we reserve for potential losses from existing events, such as those arising from natural
disaster events, may not be adequate to cover actual claims that may arise.
In the lenders mortgage insurance business, insurance risk arises primarily from unexpected downturn in economic conditions
leading to higher levels of mortgage defaults from unemployment or other economic factors.
If our reinsurance arrangements are not effective, this could also lead to greater risks, and more losses than anticipated.
We could suffer losses due to impairment of capitalised software, goodwill and other intangible assets that may
adversely affect our business, operations or financial condition.
In certain circumstances Westpac may be exposed to a reduction in the value of intangible assets. As at 30 September 2017,
Westpac carried goodwill principally related to its investments in Australia, other intangible assets principally relating to assets
recognised on acquisition of subsidiaries and capitalised software balances.
Westpac is required to assess the recoverability of the goodwill and other intangible asset balances on at least an annual basis
or wherever an indicator of impairment exists. For this purpose Westpac uses a discounted cash flow calculation. Changes in
the methodology or assumptions upon which the calculation is based, together with expected changes in future cash flows,
could materially impact this assessment, resulting in the potential write-off of part or all of the intangible assets.
Capitalised software and other intangible assets are assessed for indicators of impairment at least annually or on indication of
impairment. In the event that an asset is no longer in use, or its value has been reduced or that its estimated useful life has
declined, an impairment will be recorded, adversely impacting the Group’s financial condition. The estimates and assumptions
used in assessing the useful life of an asset can be affected by a range of factors including changes in strategy and the rate of
external changes in technology and regulatory requirements.
We could suffer losses if we fail to syndicate or sell down underwritten securities
As a financial intermediary, we underwrite listed and unlisted debt and equity securities. Underwriting activities include the
development of solutions for corporate and institutional customers who need capital and investor customers who have an
appetite for certain investment products. We may guarantee the pricing and placement of these facilities. We could suffer
losses if we fail to syndicate or sell down our risk to other market participants. This risk is more pronounced in times of
heightened market volatility.
Certain strategic decisions may have adverse effects on our business
Westpac, at times, evaluates and may implement strategic decisions and objectives including diversification, innovation,
divestment or business expansion initiatives, including acquisitions of businesses. The expansion or integration of a new
business, or entry into a new business, can be complex and costly and may require Westpac to comply with additional local or
foreign regulatory requirements which may carry additional risks. In addition, we may be unable to successfully divest
businesses or assets. These activities may, for a variety of reasons, not deliver the anticipated positive business results and
could have a negative impact on our business, prospects, engagement with regulators, financial performance or financial
condition.
Risk management
Westpac’s vision is to be one of the world’s great service companies, helping our customers, communities and people to
prosper and grow.
Effective risk management including a sound risk culture is one of the keys to achieving our vision as it influences our
customers’ experiences, the public’s perceptions, our financial performance, our reputation and our shareholders’ expectations.
It is critical to our future success. We regard managing risk as a core function performed at all levels of the Group.
The Risk Management Strategy is approved by the Board and reviewed by the Board Risk and Compliance Committee (BRCC)
on an annual basis or more frequently where required by a material business or strategy change or a material change to the
Group’s risk profile. It is owned by the Chief Executive Officer (CEO).
2
106 2017 Westpac Group Annual Report
For further information regarding the role and responsibilities of the BRCC and other Board committees in managing risk, refer
to Westpac’s 2017 Corporate Governance Statement available at www.westpac.com.au/corpgov.
The CEO and Executive Team are responsible for implementing our Risk Management Strategy and frameworks, and for
developing policies, controls, processes and procedures for identifying and managing risk in all of Westpac’s activities.
We adopt a Three Lines of Defence approach to risk management which reflects our culture of ‘risk is everyone’s business’ in
which all employees are responsible for identifying and managing risk and operating within the Group’s desired risk profile.
For a discussion of the risks to which Westpac is exposed, and its policies to manage these risks, refer to Westpac’s 2017
Corporate Governance Statement and Note 22 to the financial statements.
Credit risk
Credit risk is the risk of financial loss where a customer or counterparty fails to meet their financial obligations to Westpac.
We have a framework and supporting policies for managing the credit risk associated with lending across our business
divisions. The framework and policies encompass all stages of the credit cycle – origination, evaluation, approval,
documentation, settlement, ongoing administration and problem management. For example, we have established product-
based standards for lending to individuals, with key controls including minimum serviceability standards and maximum loan to
security value ratios. We offer residential property loans to both owner-occupiers and investors at both fixed and variable rates,
secured by a mortgage over the property or other acceptable collateral. Where we lend to higher loan to value ratios, we
typically also require lenders mortgage insurance. Similarly, we have established criteria for business, commercial, corporate
and institutional lending, which can vary by industry segment. In this area we focus on the performance of key financial risk
ratios, including interest coverage, debt serviceability and balance sheet structure. When providing finance to smaller business,
commercial and corporate borrowers we typically obtain security, such as a mortgage over property and/or a general security
agreement over business assets. For larger corporates and institutions, we typically also require compliance with selected
financial ratios and undertakings and may hold security. In respect of commercial property lending, we maintain loan origination
and ongoing risk management standards, including specialised management for higher value loans. We consider factors such
as the nature, location, quality and expected demand for the asset, tenancy profile and experience and quality of management.
We actively monitor the Australian and New Zealand property markets and the composition of our commercial property loan
book across the Group.
The extension of credit is underpinned by the Group’s Principles of Responsible Lending. This is reflected in our commitment to
comply with all local legislation, codes of practice and relevant guidelines and obligations to market our products responsibly
and stay in touch with the expectations of customers and the community.
Refer to Note 22 to the financial statements for details of our credit risk management policies.
Provisions for impairment charges on loans
For information on the basis for determining the provision for impairment charges on loans refer to ‘Critical accounting
assumptions and estimates’ in Note 14 to the financial statements.
Credit risk concentrations
We monitor our credit portfolio to manage risk concentrations. At 30 September 2017, our exposure to consumers comprised
72% (2016: 72%, 2015: 71%) of our on-balance sheet loans and 59% (2016: 58%, 2015: 57%) of total credit commitments. At
30 September 2017, 92% (2016: 91%, 2015: 90%) of our exposure to consumers was supported by residential real estate
mortgages. The consumer category includes investment property loans to individuals, credit cards, personal loans, overdrafts
and lines of credit. Our consumer credit risks are diversified, with substantial consumer market share in every state and territory
in Australia, New Zealand and the Pacific region. Moreover, these customers service their debts with incomes derived from a
wide range of occupations, in city as well as country areas.
Exposures to businesses, government and other financial institutions are classified into a number of industry clusters based on
groupings of related Australian and New Zealand Standard Industrial Classification (ANZSIC) codes and are monitored against
industry risk limits. The level of industry risk is measured and monitored on a dynamic basis. We also control the concentration
risks that can arise from large exposures to individual borrowers.
Liquidity risk
Liquidity risk is the risk that the Group will be unable to fund assets and meet obligations as they become due. This risk could
potentially arise as a result of:
an inability to meet both expected and unexpected current and future cash flows and collateral needs without affecting
either daily operations or the financial condition of the bank; and/or
inadequate market depth or market disruption impacting the ability to offset or eliminate a position at the market price.
The Westpac Group has a liquidity risk management framework which seeks to meet cash flow obligations under a wide range
of market conditions, including name specific and market-wide scenarios as well as meeting the requirements of the LCR.
Refer to Note 22 to the financial statements for a more detailed discussion of our liquidity risk management policies.
Risk and risk management
2017 Westpac Group Annual Report 107
Westpac debt programs and issuing shelves
Access in a timely and flexible manner to a diverse range of debt markets and investors is provided by the following programs
and issuing shelves as at 30 September 2017:
Program Limit Issuer(s) Program/Issuing Shelf Type
Australia
No limit WBC Debt Issuance Program
Euro Market
USD 2.5 billion WBC Euro Transferable Certificate of Deposit Program
USD 20 billion WBC/WSNZL
1
Euro Commercial Paper and Certificate of Deposit Program
USD 70 billion WBC Euro Medium Term Note Program
USD 10 billion WSNZL
1
Euro Medium Term Note Program
USD 40 billion WBC
2
Global Covered Bond Program
EUR 5 billion WSNZL
3
Global Covered Bond Program
Japan
JPY 750 billion WBC Samurai shelf
JPY 750 billion WBC Uridashi shelf
United States
USD 45 billion WBC US Commercial Paper Program
USD 10 billion WSNZL
1
US Commercial Paper Program
USD 35 billion WBC US Medium Term Note Program
USD 15 billion WBC (NY Branch) US Medium Term Deposit Note Program
No limit WBC (NY Branch) Certificate of Deposit Program
No limit WBC US Securities and Exchange Commission registered shelves
New Zealand
No limit WNZL Medium Term Note and Registered Certificate of Deposit Program
1
Notes issued under this program by Westpac Securities NZ Limited, London branch are guaranteed by Westpac New Zealand Limited, its
parent company.
2
Notes issued under this program are guaranteed by BNY Trust Company of Australia Limited as trustee of the Westpac Covered Bond Trust.
3
Notes issued under this program by Westpac Securities NZ Limited, London branch are guaranteed by Westpac New Zealand Limited, its parent
company, and Westpac NZ Covered Bond Limited.
Market risk
Market risk is the risk of an adverse impact on earnings resulting from changes in market factors, such as foreign exchange
rates, interest rates, commodity prices or equity prices. This includes interest rate risk in the banking book – the risk to interest
income from a mismatch between the duration of assets and liabilities that arises in the normal course of business activities.
Market risk arises in both trading and banking book activities.
Our trading activities are conducted in our Financial Markets and Treasury businesses. Financial Markets trading book activity
represents dealings that encompass book running and distribution activity. Treasury’s trading activity represents dealings that
include the management of interest rate, foreign exchange (FX) and credit spread risk associated with wholesale funding, liquid
asset portfolios and hedging of foreign currency earnings and capital deployed offshore.
Refer to Note 22 to the financial statements for a more detailed discussion of our market risk management policies.
2
108 2017 Westpac Group Annual Report
The table below depicts the aggregate Value at Risk (VaR), by risk type, for traded risk for the year ended 30 September:
Consolidated and Parent Entity 2017 2016 2015
$m High Low Average High Low Average High Low Average
Interest rate risk 16.0 4.6 8.5 14.0 4.6 8.8 18.1 7.0 11.4
Foreign exchange risk 9.4 0.6 3.1 12.2 1.4 5.1 11.8 0.5 3.6
Equity risk 0.4 0.0 0.1 2.9 0.1 0.3 0.6 0.1 0.3
Commodity risk
1
14.1 3.3 6.6 4.5 1.4 2.7 5.7 1.7 3.1
Other market risks
2
5.1 3.5 4.2 6.0 2.6 3.6 6.7 2.9 4.6
Diversification effect n/a n/a (8.6) n/a n/a (8.0) n/a n/a (7.2)
Net market risk 22.9 9.7 13.9 18.7 7.7 12.5 23.5 9.0 15.8
1
Includes electricity risk.
2
Include prepayment risk and credit spread risk (exposure to movements in generic credit rating bands).
The graph below compares the actual profit and loss from trading activities on a daily basis to VaR
1
over the reporting period:
Traded Risk: Actual Profit and Loss vs. VaR
01 October 2016 to 30 September 2017
Each point on the graph represents one day’s profit or loss from trading activities. The result is placed on the graph relative to
the associated VaR utilisation. The downward sloping line represents the point where a loss is equal to VaR utilisation.
Therefore, any point below the line represents a back-test exception (i.e. where the loss is greater than VaR).
Operational risk and compliance risk
Operational risk is the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, people and systems, or from external
events. This definition is aligned to regulatory (Basel II) definition, including legal and regulatory risk but excluding strategic and
reputation risk. It also includes, among other things, technology risk, model risk and outsourcing risk.
The way operational risk is managed has the potential to positively or negatively impact our customers, our employees, our
financial performance and our reputation.
Compliance risk is the risk of legal or regulatory sanction, financial or reputational loss, arising from our failure to abide by the
compliance obligations required of us.
For information on our management of operational and compliance risk, refer to Westpac’s 2017 Corporate Governance
Statement, available at www.westpac.com.au/corpgov.
1
Westpac estimates VaR as the potential loss in earnings from adverse market movements and is calculated over a 1 day time horizon to a 99%
confidence level using 1 year of historical data.
(20)
(15)
(10)
(5)
-
5
10
15
20
- 5 10 15 20
Actual Profit
and Loss ($m)
Daily Value at Risk ($m)
Risk and risk management
2017 Westpac Group Annual Report 109
The Group’s Operational Risk Management Framework and Compliance Management Framework provide the basis for
divisions to identify, assess, measure, manage, monitor and report on their risks. The Operational Risk Management
Framework sets out the Group’s approach to managing operational risk, and is supported by a number of key Group-wide and
divisional operational risk policies. The Compliance Management Framework sets out the approach of Westpac Group to
managing compliance obligations and mitigating compliance risk, in order to achieve our compliance objective. This is
discussed in further detail in Note 22 to the financial statements.
Other risks
Business risk
The risk associated with the vulnerability of a line of business to changes in the business environment.
Conduct risk
The risk that our provision of services and products results in unsuitable or unfair outcomes for our stakeholders or undermines
market integrity.
The Westpac Group Code of Conduct describes the standards of conduct expected of our people, both employees and
contractors. It is supported by policies and procedures to manage conduct-related risks, including through our dealings in
financial markets, and through managing our statutory and professional obligations to specific clients, including fiduciary and
suitability requirements, and product management and design.
Sustainability risk
The risk of reputational or financial loss due to failure to recognise or address material existing or emerging sustainability
related environmental, social or governance issues.
The Group has in place a Sustainability Risk Management Framework that is supported by a suite of key policies and position
statements. These include the Principles for Doing Business, Responsible Investment Position Statement, Environmental,
Social and Governance (ESG) Credit Risk Policy, Climate Change Position Statement and Action Plan, Human Rights Position
Statement and Action Plan and sensitive sector position statements, and Responsible Sourcing Code of Conduct and
Framework, many of which are publicly available. The Sustainability Risk Management Framework was reviewed and updated
in 2017.
Westpac is also a signatory to a number of voluntary principles-based frameworks that guide the integration of ESG-related
issues into banking, lending and investment analysis. These include the Equator Principles, covering project finance activities
and the Principles for Responsible Investments, covering investment analysis.
Equity risk
The potential for financial loss arising from movements in equity values. Equity risk may be direct, indirect or contingent.
The Group’s direct equity risk arises from principal investments or net trading or underwriting positions in listed or unlisted
equities. It also includes seed funding, debt for equity swaps, equity derivatives and other situations where the value of
Westpac’s investment is directly affected by the change in value of the equity instrument to the full extent of that change.
Our indirect equity risk arises from movements in the equity markets that affect business performance e.g. income derived as a
result of managing or the administration of equity investments on behalf of other parties where fee income is based on the
value of funds under management.
Our contingent equity risk arises from normal lending activities secured by, or with recourse to, listed and/or unlisted equities or
to another equity-like source of risk protection. This risk materialises when there is a default, and a subsequent shortfall from
the realisation of equity-related assets that is not covered from other sources of recourse.
The Group has in place various policies, limits and controls which seek to manage these risks and the conflicts of interest that
can potentially arise.
Insurance risk
The risk in our licensed regulated insurance entities of mis-estimation of the expected cost of insured events, volatility in the
number or severity of insured events, and mis-estimation of the cost of incurred claims.
Subsidiaries within the Group undertake life insurance, general insurance and lenders mortgage insurance. They are governed
by independent boards and are subject to separate regulatory oversight and controls. These subsidiaries have reinsurance
arrangements in place to reduce risk, including from catastrophic events. They are capitalised to a level that exceeds the
minimum required by the relevant regulator.
Related entity (contagion) risk
The risk that problems arising in other Westpac Group members compromise the financial and operational position of the
authorised deposit-taking institution in the Westpac Group.
The Group has in place a Related Entity Risk Management Framework and a suite of supporting policies and procedures
governing the control of dealings with, and activities that may be undertaken by, Group members. Controls include the
measurement, approval and monitoring of, and limitations on, the extent of intra-group credit exposures and other forms of
2
110 2017 Westpac Group Annual Report
parent entity support, plus requirements related to control of Group badging, product distribution, promotional material, service-
level agreements and managing potential conflicts of interest.
Reputation risk
The risk of the loss of reputation, stakeholder confidence, or public trust and standing.
Reputation risk arises where there are differences between stakeholder’s current and/or emerging perceptions, beliefs and
expectations relative to our current and planned activities, performance and behaviours. It can affect the Group’s brands and
businesses positively or negatively. Stakeholder perceptions can include (but are not limited to) views on financial performance,
quality of products or services, quality of management, leadership and governance, history and heritage and our approach to
sustainability, social responsibility and ethical behaviour.
We have a Reputation Risk Management Framework and key supporting policies in place covering the way we manage
reputation risk as one of our key risks across the Group, including the setting of risk appetite and roles and responsibilities for
risk identification, measurement and management, monitoring and reporting. The Reputation Risk Management Framework
was reviewed and updated in 2017.
Structured entities
We are associated with a number of structured entities in the ordinary course of business, primarily to provide funding and
financial services products to our customers.
Structured entities are typically set up for a single, pre-defined purpose, have a limited life, generally are not operating entities
and do not have employees. The most common form of structured entity involves the acquisition of financial assets by the
structured entity that is funded by the issuance of securities to external investors (securitisation). Repayment of the securities is
determined by the performance of the assets acquired by the structured entity.
Under AAS, a structured entity is consolidated and reported as part of the Group if it is controlled by the parent entity in line
with AASB 10 Consolidated Financial Statements. The definition of control is based on the substance rather than the legal
form. Refer to Note 36 to the financial statements for a description of how we apply the requirements to evaluate whether to
consolidate structured entities and for information on both consolidated and unconsolidated structured entities.
In the ordinary course of business, we have established or sponsored the establishment of structured entities in relation to
securitisation, as detailed below.
Covered bond guarantors
Through our covered bond programs we assign our equitable interests in residential mortgage loans to a structured entity
covered bond guarantor which guarantees the obligations of our covered bonds. We provide arm’s length swaps to the covered
bond guarantor in accordance with relevant prudential guidelines. We have no obligation to repurchase any assets from the
covered bond guarantor, other than in certain circumstances where there is a breach of representation or warranty. We may
repurchase loans from the covered bond guarantor at our discretion, subject to the conditions set out in the transaction
documents.
As at 30 September 2017, the carrying value of assets pledged for the covered bond programs for the Group was $42.1 billion
(2016: $45.4 billion).
Refer to Note 25 to the financial statements for further details.
Securitisation structured entities
Through our securitisation programs we assign our equitable interests in assets (in respect of RMBS, principally residential
mortgage loans, and in respect of ABS, principally auto receivables) to structured entities, which issue securities to investors.
We provide arm’s length interest rate swaps and liquidity facilities to the structured entities in accordance with relevant
prudential guidelines. We have no obligation to repurchase any securitisation securities, unless there is a breach of
representation or warranty within 120 days of the initial sale (except in respect of our program in New Zealand which imposes
no such time limitation). We may remove assets from the program where they cease to conform with the terms and conditions
of the securitisation programs or through a program’s clean-up features.
As at 30 September 2017, our assets securitised through a combination of privately or publicly placed issues primarily to
Australian, New Zealand, European and Asian investors was $8.2 billion (2016: $9.5 billion).
Under AAS substantially all of the structured entities involved in our loan securitisation programs are consolidated by the
Group.
Refer to Note 25 to the financial statements for further details.
Risk and risk management
2017 Westpac Group Annual Report 111
Customer funding conduits
We arrange financing for certain customer transactions through a commercial paper conduit that provides customers with
access to the commercial paper market. As at 30 September 2017, we administered one significant conduit (2016: one), that
was created prior to 1 February 2003, with commercial paper outstanding of $0.4 billion (2016: $0.9 billion). We provide a letter
of credit facility as credit support to the commercial paper issued by the conduit. This facility is a variable interest in the conduit
that we administer and represents a maximum exposure to loss of $41 million as at 30 September 2017 (2016: $97 million).
The conduit is consolidated by the Group.
Refer to Note 25 to the financial statements for further details.
Structured finance transactions
We have entered into transactions with structured entities to provide financing to customers or to provide financing to the
Group. Any financing arrangements to customers are entered into under normal lending criteria and are subject to our normal
credit approval processes. The assets arising from these financing activities are generally included in loans, receivables due
from other financial institutions or available-for-sale securities. The liabilities arising from these financing activities are generally
included in payables due to other financial institutions, debt issues or financial liabilities designated at fair value. Exposures in
the form of guarantees or undrawn credit lines are included within contingent liabilities and credit-related commitments.
Other off-balance sheet arrangements
Refer to Note 38 to the financial statements for details of our superannuation plans and Note 31 for details of our contingent
liabilities, contingent assets and credit commitments.
Financial reporting
Internal control over financial reporting
The US Congress passed the Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act in July 2002, which is commonly
known as the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOx). SOx is a wide ranging piece of US legislation concerned largely with financial
reporting and corporate governance. We are obligated to comply with SOx by virtue of being a foreign registrant with the SEC
and we have established procedures designed to comply with all applicable requirements of SOx.
Disclosure controls and procedures
Our management, with the participation of our CEO and CFO, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the US Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of
30 September 2017.
Based upon this evaluation, our CEO and CFO have concluded that the design and operation of our disclosure controls and
procedures were effective as of 30 September 2017.
Management’s Report on internal control over financial reporting
Rule 13a-15(a) under the US Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires us to maintain an effective system of internal control
over financial reporting. Refer to the sections headed ‘Management’s report on internal control over financial reporting’ and
‘Report of independent registered public accounting firm’ in Section 3 for those reports.
Changes in our internal control over financial reporting
There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the US Securities
Exchange Act of 1934) for the year ended 30 September 2017 that has been identified and that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
2
Westpac’s approach to sustainability
112 2017 Westpac Group Annual Report
Sustainability performance
Westpac’s approach to sustainability
The Group’s approach to operating sustainably is designed to anticipate, respond to and shape the most pressing emerging
topics (issues and opportunities) that have the potential to materially impact customers, employees, suppliers, shareholders
and communities. We believe that as one of Australia’s largest companies we have a role to play in helping to create positive
social, economic and environmental impact, for the benefit of all. This view is embedded within our core business activities, and
aligns with the priorities set out in the Group’s strategy.
Guiding our approach
Accountability for the Group’s Sustainability Strategy starts with the Board and flows through to all employees. The Board has
responsibility for considering the social, ethical and environmental impact of the Group’s activities, setting standards and
monitoring compliance with sustainability policies and practices. The Westpac Sustainability Council, comprising senior leaders
from across the business and meeting four times a year, oversees strategic progress and guides the Group’s approach.
Progress against the sustainability strategy is reported to and discussed with the Executive Team and Board twice each year,
with other items discussed on an as needs basis.
Westpac’s sustainability strategy is based upon the use of the widely accepted global standard for corporate responsibility and
sustainable development, the AA1000 AccountAbility Principles Standard (2008).
Our sustainability principles
In line with AA1000, Westpac has adopted the Standard’s three key principles:
Involving all stakeholders in identifying topics and developing strategy – Inclusivity;
Evaluating all topics identified to determine the impact they may have on stakeholders and the Group’s operations –
Sustainability materiality; and
Ensuring decisions, actions and performance, as well as communication with stakeholders, is responsive to the topics
identified – Responsiveness.
Frameworks and policies
Westpac responds to enduring and emerging material topics through frameworks and policies that are complementary to the
business strategy and form part of the Group’s overall approach to risk management. Collectively, they help to guide decisions,
manage risk and drive action. Key frameworks and policies include:
Our Principles for Doing Business – which sets out the behaviours the Group expects to be judged against in pursuit of the
vision, and the framework to embed sustainable practices throughout the business in the areas of: governance and ethics;
customer practices; employee practices; care for the environment; community involvement; and supply chain
management;
Our Sustainability and Reputation Risk Management Frameworks – which set out how the Group manages these risks in
operations, lending and investment decisions, and the supply chain provides a clear guide on roles and responsibilities
within the organisation, reflecting the Group’s ‘three lines of defence’ risk management approach; and
A suite of policies that embed the principles and management requirements into day to day operations. These include
internal and external sensitive sector position statements, as well as Group-wide issue-based positions.
Sustainability leadership
Leadership in sustainability is regularly acknowledged and validated by a number of third party ratings and awards. During
2017, these included:
Assessed as the most sustainable bank globally in the 2017 Dow Jones Sustainability Indices (DJSI) achieving a score of
94. This marks the fourth year in a row and 10th time that Westpac has achieved global banking sector leadership, and the
16th year in a row that Westpac has been recognised among global banking leaders;
Assigned a Gold Class ranking in the RobecoSAM Sustainability Yearbook for 2017, released in January 2017; and
Recognised as one of only ten Australian companies to achieve Leadership level in the 2017 CDP
1
, with a climate score of
A-. This puts Westpac among the top 22% of companies globally to achieve this level.
1
Formerly the Carbon Disclosure Project.
Westpac’s approach to sustainability
2017 Westpac Group Annual Report 113
Material sustainability topics
Westpac identifies the most material sustainability topics through regular assessments of industry trends, internal reports,
information from stakeholder engagement and independent research. The table below outlines those topics considered highly
material for the Group and its stakeholders, and further detailed in Westpac’s 2017 Sustainability Performance Report.
Prioritisation of material topics continues to be subject to annual independent external assurance by PricewaterhouseCoopers.
Material sustainability topic Full year responses and achievements
Customer
experience,
support and
access
Customers’ needs are
becoming more complex,
and at the same time they
want banking to be simpler
and more efficient.
Launched a new credit card, Westpac Lite, in response to customer feedback for a
simple, low rate and low limit ‘no frills’ credit card and also launched Westpac
SmartPlan, an online tool to help customers manage their credit card balance and
pay down their debts more easily;
Introduced a number of new products and services such as ‘Bump Savings account’
which encourages savings habits early that allows parents and children to set and
track savings goals; and partnered with Mathspace to provide free access to online
maths education for all Australians; and
Released a Financial Inclusion Plan outlining our vision for financial inclusion, with
priority areas of crisis and hardship, understanding money and inclusive growth.
Information
security and
data privacy
Maintaining customer
confidentiality and the
security of our systems is
paramount given the threat
of cyberattacks and the
evolving nature of
technology.
Invested in new cybersecurity capability and additional dedicated resources to
counter new and emerging threats;
Enhanced the resilience and security of systems to protect the privacy,
confidentiality, integrity and availability of customer information and sensitive
commercial data; and
Delivered cybercrime information sessions to more than 3,000 business customer
across Australian capital cities.
Digital product
and service
transformation
Digitisation offers
opportunities to improve
efficiency and deliver
services in new ways,
including new fintech
business models which we
are embracing to better
meet changing customer
expectations.
Introduced 160 new features and enhancements across digital banking platforms,
including:
- categorisation of customers transactions into groups such as bills and payments,
food and beverages etc;
- secured and unsecured personal loan applications where existing customers can
apply online, receive an instant response, accept their contract electronically and
receive funds automatically 24/7.
Westpac Quick Transfer is a new function in our mobile banking app allowing
customers to make transfers among their own accounts without having to log in.
This was awarded a 2017 CANSTAR Innovation Excellence Award; and
Continued to incubate and partner with a number of fintech start-ups to offer new
services for customers now and in the future.
Changing
regulatory
landscape
Supervision and regulation
in jurisdictions in which
Westpac operates continues
to evolve, creating
uncertainty in the operating
environment.
Invested over $325 million during the year to enhance existing and implement new
processes to comply with recent regulatory and compliance changes; and
For further detail, see Section 1 Information on Westpac.
Conduct and
culture
Conduct and culture is vital
for maintaining the trust of
customers, shareholders
and regulators.
Established a customer advocate to provide a new independent avenue of review of
complaints for personal and small business customers;
Rolled out refreshed ‘Doing the Right Thing’ mandatory compliance training which
aligns to our Values and includes an updated ethical awareness component;
Improved alignment of sales practices to Our Service Promise by removing all sales
incentives for tellers and personal bankers are now incentivised equally for sales
and service;
Updated Whistleblower Policy, increased the channels available to report matters,
and established a wellbeing and quality assurance process to ensure whistleblowers
receive adequate support;
Continue to actively review the design and communication of our products and
services for fairness and suitability, and established Product Governance
Committees in each division; and
Made progress in implementing industry reform initiatives, such as the conduct
background check protocol, through our commitment to the ABA-led Better Banking
Reform Program.
2
114 2017 Westpac Group Annual Report
Material sustainability topic Full year responses and achievements
Governance,
risk and
remuneration
Clear governance practices,
active management of risk,
commitment to compliance,
and fair remuneration in our
operations, supplier and
partner relationships is critical
to the longevity and financial
wellbeing of the Group.
For further detail, see Section 1 Corporate governance and our Remuneration Report
and Section 2 Risk and risk management.
Financial and
economic
performance
Maintaining a healthy
financial performance and
strong balance sheet is vital
to the Group’s long term
sustainability.
Delivered another sound performance with a cash return on equity of 13.8%
supported by disciplined business growth and well managed margins;
Strengthened the balance sheet meeting APRA’s ‘unquestionably strong’ capital
benchmark capital ratio of 10.5%. On track for the implementation of the Net Stable
Funding Ratio on 1 January 2018; and
Asset quality has improved with level of stressed assets decreasing over the year.
Climate
change
transition
and
opportunities
As a major financial
institution, Westpac has an
important role to play in
supporting the transition to a
sustainable economy model
aligned to a two degree
economy, meaning the
Australian economy reaches
net zero emissions by 2050.
Informed by our climate scenario analysis completed in 2016, developed the next
phase of actions we are taking over the short, medium and long term demonstrating
our commitment to operate consistent with limiting global warming to less than two
degrees Celsius;
Issued the first offshore foreign currency Climate Bond by an Australian bank, and
published the first Westpac Climate Bond Impact Report;
Announced new targets to increase lending and facilitate climate change solutions;
and
Continued to report climate related disclosures in our annual Sustainability
Performance Report and commenced alignment with the recommendations of the
Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD).
Value chain
sustainability
risks
We actively manage a range
of sustainability risks
(including climate change
and human rights) in our
value chain through our
lending to customers, our
investments in funds, and
through our supply chain.
Continued to apply the Group’s Sustainability Risk Management Framework to the
identification, assessment and management of sustainability risks across the
organisation – including to decisions related to customers and suppliers;
Refreshed and reset our Position Statement and 2020 Action Plan for both Human
Rights and Climate Change and updated other position statements, including
Financing Agribusiness and Providers of Payday Lending;
Released our Responsible Sourcing Code of Conduct and established a global
Responsible Sourcing Steering Committee to oversee its application across
jurisdictions; and
Released our first statement in response to the UK Modern Slavery Act requirements
for large companies operating in the UK to report on the steps taken to prevent
slavery and human trafficking in supply chains.
Inclusion
and diversity
As the population ages and
becomes more culturally
diverse, Westpac needs to
think creatively about how to
find, develop and retain the
right employees and tailor
services that consider diverse
customer needs.
Reached 50% women in leadership roles and exceeded 40% women in general
management positions;
Indigenous employment parity was maintained, whereby the proportion of Indigenous
Australians employed is 4%, reflecting the proportion of Indigenous Australians in the
wider Australian population;
Hosted Australia’s first corporate LGBTIQ inclusion summit which featured a number
of high profile speakers from business, sports and entertainment;
Announced our Accessibility Action Plan for 2017-2020 continuing our public
commitment to enhance access and inclusion for our employees, customers and
communities; and
St.George Bank became the first Australian bank to be accredited as dementia-
friendly by Alzheimer’s Australia.
Talent
attraction
and retention
Attracting, retaining and
developing the right people
requires innovative
recruitment strategies and
working conditions to match
changing employee
expectations.
Launched Certificate of Executive Leadership, a professional accreditation with the
Australian Graduate School of Management in Australia and the University of
Auckland in New Zealand to more than 900 leaders to strengthen the leadership
capabilities of our middle managers;
Introduced Motivate, our new approach to performance, development and reward to
four divisions, with the remainder set to follow in 2018;
To build the skills of the future and encourage a culture of lifelong learning,
LearningBank (our new learning and development platform) was extended to all
employees and to Westpac Scholars through the Westpac Bicentennial Foundation;
and
Conducted a Group-wide employee engagement survey which demonstrated good
progress in all key areas and an overall engagement score of 79%, placing the
Group in the top 25% of companies globally against the survey benchmark.
For further detail, please see our Annual Review and Sustainability Report and Sustainability Performance Report.
Westpac’s approach to sustainability
2017 Westpac Group Annual Report 115
Sustainability objectives
Our 2013-2017 Sustainability Strategy sets measureable objectives against the following three priority areas:
Embracing societal change: helping improve the way people work and live, as our society changes;
Environmental solutions: helping find solutions to environmental challenges; and
Better financial futures: helping customers to have a better relationship with money, for a better life.
Performance against sustainability objectives
1
Priority Objectives Full year 2017 performance
Help improve
the way
people work
and live, as
our society
changes
Ensure our workforce is
representative of the community
Proportion of leadership roles held by women increased from 48% to 50%
achieving the Group’s 2017 target;
Recruited an additional 177 people who identify as Aboriginal and Torres Strait
Islander peoples, bringing to 628 those recruited and exceeding our three year
goal of 500 by 2017;
Participation of mature aged workers (50+) is 22.2%, up from 21.5% a year ago;
and
Financial wellbeing of women aged 40+ as rated by the BT Financial Health Index
survey remained stable.
Extend length and quality of
working lives
Mean employee retirement age was 62.3 years, up compared to a year ago; and
Workplace wellbeing as measured by the Work Ability Index remained within the
‘good’ range.
Anticipate the future product and
service needs of ageing and
culturally diverse customers
Increased convenience for multi-cultural customers by enabling foreign currency
accounts in core currencies to be opened via Westpac Live online banking;
Introduced new Bereavement Support sites on the websites for all our major bank
brands, as well as Bereavement customer guide booklets;
Improved online guidance and banker training supporting bereaved customers for
all four bank brands in Australia;
Launched educational videos via the Westpac Davidson Institute to help new
arrivals and multicultural Australians better understand Australian super, tax and
the process of transferring money overseas; and
Launched live stream videos via our social media platforms with tips on how
Chinese students in the midst of planning their move to Australia can manage
their finances.
Help find
solutions to
environmental
challenges
Provide products and services to
help customers adapt to
environmental challenges
Since 2013 launched nine unique products/services, including incorporation of
sustainability market data into the Panorama investment platform and announced
as the preferred financial partner for the Tasmanian Energy Efficiency Loan
Scheme.
Increase lending and investment
in CleanTech and environmental
services
Increased committed exposure to the CleanTech and environmental services
sector relative to 2016, taking total committed exposure to $7.0 billion, surpassing
the 2017 target by 16%.
Reduce our environmental
footprint
Maintained carbon neutral status and achieved a reduction of more than 40% in
office paper consumption since 2012;
Bank of Melbourne’s 525 Collins Street branch became the first 6 Star Green Star
bank branch in Victoria, reflecting leading eco-efficient practices;
Achieved 2017 power usage effectiveness target of 1.6 and surpassed the 2017
energy efficiency target with 169 kWh/m
2
; and
Recycling rates and water consumption in Sydney head offices improved to 75%
and 104,866 kL respectively.
1
All results as at 30 September 2017 except environmental footprint which is as at 30 June 2017. Refer to www.westpac.com.au/sustainability for
glossary of terms and metric definitions.
2
116 2017 Westpac Group Annual Report
Priority Objectives Full year 2017 performance
Help
customers to
have a better
relationship
with money,
for a better
life
Ensure all our customers
have access to the right
advice to achieve a
secure retirement
Lifted engagement between customers and BT Adviser View to increase transparency on
quality of advice and service; and
BT Advice average customer satisfaction rating was 4.91 out of 5.00 for 2017, above the
target of 4.90.
Help our customers meet
their financial goals in
retirement
The proportion of Group customers with Group superannuation was 7.5%, a decrease
compared to 7.8% in 2016;
Launched SuperCheck, a tool which allows our customers to find all their superannuation
within 60 seconds and open an account and rollover in three clicks, in Westpac and
St.George group channels; and
‘Wealth Review’ tool provided members and their families key insights into their financial
position.
Increase access to
financial services in the
Pacific
Launched Choice Wantok, an ambitious financial inclusion program in PNG as part of a
joint venture between Westpac and the Pacific Financial Inclusion Program;
Met 2017 target for the number of 300,000 Choice Basic banking customers in our Pacific
operations ahead of schedule; and
There were nearly 177,000 mobile banking activations and over 330,000 In-store
transactional volumes as at 30 September 2017.
Help people gain access
to social and affordable
housing and services
Lent over $1.32 billion to the social and affordable housing sector, up from $1.05 billion at
30 September 2016 and short of our $2 billion 2017 target.
Westpac’s approach to sustainability
2017 Westpac Group Annual Report 117
Five year non-financial summary
1
Key trends across a range of non-financial areas of performance are provided in the following five year non-financial summary,
with a more detailed account of sustainability performance included in our Annual Review and Sustainability Report and
Sustainability Performance Report.
2017 2016 2015 2014 2013
Customer
Total customers (millions)
2
13.8 13.4 13.1 12.8 12.2
Digitally active customers (millions)
3
5.3 4.9 4.9 4.7 4.2
Branches
4
1,251 1,310 1,429 1,534 1,544
Branches with 24/7 capability (%)
5
29 27 22 15 -
ATMs 3,665 3,757 3,850 3,890 3,814
Smart ATMs (%)
6
44 37 31 24 17
Change in consumer compliments (%) - Australia 19 38 - - -
Change in consumer complaints (%) - Australia (18) (31) (31) (27) (15)
Change in consumer complaints (%) - NZ (21) (7) (18) (16) 19
Wealth customer penetration (%)
7
17.6 19.1 19.7 20.0 18.7
Employees
Total employees (full-time equivalent)
8
35,096 35,580 35,484 36,596 35,894
Employee voluntary attrition (%)
9
9.6 10.6 10.6 9.8 9.8
New starter retention (%)
10
84.7 85.5 85.3 88.0 86.7
Employee engagement index (%)
11
79 69 - - -
Lost Time Injury Frequency Rate (LTIFR)
12
0.6 0.8 0.8 1.1 1.5
Women as percentage of the total workforce (%) 58 58 59 59 60
Women in leadership (%)
13
50 48 46 44 42
Environment
Total Scope 1 and 2 emissions - Aust and NZ (tonnes CO
2
-e)
14
131,723 154,339 173,437 175,855 180,862
Total Scope 3 emissions - Aust and NZ (tonnes CO
2
-e)
15
68,415 63,016 67,899 73,871 85,013
Paper consumption - Aust and NZ (tonnes)
16
2,706 3,304 4,857 5,334 5,762
Sustainable lending and investment
CleanTech and environmental services attributable
financing - Aust and NZ ($m) 6,979 6,193 6,054 7,978 6,438
Proportion of electricity generation financing in renewables including
hydro - Aust and NZ (%)
17
65 59 61 59 55
Electricity generation portfolio emissions intensity
(tonnes CO
2
-e/MWh)
18
0.36 0.38 0.38 0.41 0.44
Finance assessed under the Equator Principles - Group ($m)
19
891 617 1,065 851 268
Responsible investment funds under management ($m)
20
21,881 18,723 15,017 - -
Social impact
Community investment ($m)
21
164 148 149 217 131
Community investment as a percentage of pre-tax profits - Group (%) 1.42 1.39 1.30 2.02 1.33
Community investment as a percentage of pre-tax operating profit
(cash earnings basis) 1.41 1.32 1.33 1.99 1.28
Financial education (participants)
22
112,263 59,596 65,538 49,812 32,577
Supply chain
23
Number of suppliers assessed against Responsible Sourcing
Code of Conduct 31 - - - -
Spend with indigenous Australian suppliers - Australia ($m)
24
2.5 1.6 1.2 - -
2
118 2017 Westpac Group Annual Report
1
All data represents Group performance as at 30 September unless otherwise stated.
2
All customers with an active relationship (excludes channel only and potential relationships).
3
Unique customers who have successfully authenticated (including Quickzone) into the digital banking platforms within 90 days. Figures
prior to 2016 are not comparable.
4
FY16 restated from 1,309 to 1,310.
5
Branches that allow customers to self-serve 24/7 via a range of devices that allow them to withdraw and deposit cash, coin exchange etc.
(not all these services would be available at every 24/7 zone). Access determined by individual location (i.e. shopping centre opening
hours may prevent 24/7 access).
6
ATMs with deposit taking functionality. Excludes old style envelope deposit machines.
7
Data based on Roy Morgan Research, respondents aged 14+; 12 month average to September. Wealth customer penetration is defined
as the proportion of Australians who have a Deposit or Transaction Account, Mortgage, Personal Lending or Major Card with the Westpac
Group and also have Managed Investments, Superannuation or Insurance with the Westpac Group.
8
Full-time equivalent employees include permanent (full-time and pro-rata part-time staff) employees, and temporary (overtime, temporary
and contract staff) employees.
9
Employee voluntary attrition refers to the total voluntary separation of permanent employees over the 12 month average total permanent
headcount for the period (includes full time, part time and maximum term employees). Westpac Pacific figures included since FY15.
10
Voluntary new starter retention over the 12 month rolling new starter headcount for the period (includes full time and part time permanent
employees). Westpac Pacific figures included since FY15.
11
New employee engagement survey conducted in 2016 and prior data not included due to change in survey methodology.
12
Lost Time Injury Frequency Rate (LTIFR) measures the number of Lost Time Injuries, defined as injuries or illnesses (based on workers
compensation claims accepted) resulting in an employee being unable to work for a full scheduled day (or shift) other than the day (or
shift) on which the injury occurred where work was a significant contributing factor, per one million hours worked in the rolling 12 months
reported. Westpac Pacific figures included since FY16.
13
Women in Leadership refers to the proportion of women (permanent and maximum term) in leadership roles across the Group. It includes
the CEO, Group Executives, General Managers, senior leaders with significant influence on business outcomes (direct reports to General
Managers and their direct reports), large (3+) team people leaders three levels below General Manager, and Bank and Assistant Bank
Managers.
14
Scope 1 greenhouse emissions are the release of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere as a direct result of Westpac's Australian and
New Zealand banking operations. Scope 2 emissions are indirect greenhouse gas emissions from consumption of purchased electricity
from Westpac's Australian and New Zealand banking operations. Australian data is prepared in accordance with the National Greenhouse
and Energy Reporting Act 2007. New Zealand data is prepared in accordance with the guidance for Voluntary Corporate Greenhouse Gas
Reporting published by the New Zealand Ministry for the Environment. These definitions also align with the GHG protocol and ISO 14064-
1 standard and are reported for the period 1 July to 30 June.
15
Scope 3 emissions are greenhouse gases emitted as a consequence of Westpac's Australian and New Zealand banking operations but by
another facility. Australian data is prepared in accordance with the National Carbon Offset Standard. New Zealand data is prepared in
accordance with the New Zealand Ministry for the Environment for GHG reporting. These definitions also align with the GHG protocol and
ISO 14064-1 standard and are reported for the period 1 July to 30 June.
16
Total copy paper purchased (in tonnes) by the Group as reported by its suppliers.
17
Measured as the percentage of indirect and direct financing (total committed exposure) to energy generation assets in the Australian and
New Zealand electricity markets.
18
Data is based on the reported exposures to energy generation (AUD lending only). The average financed emissions intensity is calculated
by weighting each loan (total committed exposures) by the emissions intensity of each company.
19
The Equator Principles is a voluntary set of standards for determining, assessing and managing social and environmental risk in project
financing.
20
BTFG funds applying an environmental, social and governance (ESG integration) approach. Data prior to 2015 not available due to
change in reporting methodology.
21
This amount includes monetary contributions, time contributions, management costs and in-kind contributions comprising gifts and
foregone fee revenue. The 2014 figure includes Westpac's $100 million contribution to the Westpac Bicentennial Foundation.
22
Total number of employees, customers and general public attending financial education courses offered by the Westpac Group during the
year (including online webinars). In Australia financial education covers personal, business and social sector content inclusive of modules
on financial basics, owning your home, building wealth, retirement planning, starting and growing a business and financials for non-profit
organisations. New Zealand and Pacific businesses deliver locally tailored programs.
23
New metrics introduced as we implement the Group’s Responsible Sourcing Code of Conduct.
24
Annual spend with businesses that are 51% or more owned and operated by an Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander person and certified
with a relevant member organisation.
Other Westpac business information
2017 Westpac Group Annual Report 119
Employees
The number of employees in each area of business as at 30 September:
2017 2016 2015
Consumer Bank
1
10,162 9,207 9,240
Business Bank 3,136 3,186 3,060
BT Financial Group (Australia) 4,175 4,153 4,045
Westpac Institutional Bank 2,682 2,693 2,846
Westpac New Zealand
2
4,328 4,445 4,618
Group Businesses 10,613 11,896 11,675
Total Group businesses
3
35,096 35,580 35,484
1
Consumer Bank and Group Businesses employees impacted by the transfer of customer contact centres during 2017. Prior periods
were not restated
2
Comparatives have been restated for New Zealand contractors. (2016: increased by 300, 2015: increased by 243)
3
Total employees include full-time, pro-rata part time, overtime, temporary and contract staff.
2017 v 2016
Total employees decreased by 484 compared to 30 September 2016 from productivity initiatives that have streamlined and
digitised processes across both technology and operations, partly offset by investment in growth and productivity initiatives and
resources for compliance activities.
Property
We occupy premises primarily in Australia, New Zealand and the Pacific Islands including 1,251 branches (2016: 1,310) as at
30 September 2017. As at 30 September 2017, we owned approximately 1.6% (2016: 1.6%) of the premises we occupied in
Australia, none (2016: none) in New Zealand and 40% (2016: 40%) in the Pacific Islands. The remainder of premises are held
under commercial lease with terms generally averaging three to five years. As at 30 September 2017, the carrying value of our
directly owned premises and sites was approximately $95 million (2016: $102 million).
Westpac Place in the Sydney CBD is the Group’s head office. In December 2015, an Agreement for Lease was executed for
275 Kent Street, allowing for Westpac’s continued occupation of levels 1-23 until 2030, and for an earlier exit of levels 24-32 in
2024. This site is currently undergoing a refurbishment program and will have the capacity for over 6,000 staff in an agile
environment upon its completion.
Westpac also occupies levels 1-28 of T2 in International Towers Sydney with a lease extended until 2030. This site has a
capacity for over 6,000 personnel in an agile environment.
We continue a corporate presence in Kogarah, in the Sydney metro area, which is a key corporate office of St.George. The
Kogarah office has a 2,650 seat capacity and is home to ‘The Hive’, our innovation centre. A lease commitment at this site
extends to 2034 with five five-year options to extend.
In Melbourne, Westpac has occupied the majority of 150 Collins Street since October 2015 with a lease term that extends to
2026. This was Westpac’s first fully agile workspace environment with over 1,000 staff now occupying our new Melbourne
Head Office.
‘Westpac on Takutai Square’ is Westpac New Zealand’s head office, located at the eastern end of Britomart Precinct near
Customs Street in Auckland, contains 24,510 square metres of office space across two buildings and has a capacity of
approximately 2,110 seats. A lease commitment at this site extends to 2021, with two six-year options to extend.
Significant long term agreements
Westpac has no individual contracts, other than contracts entered into in the ordinary course of business, that would constitute
a material contract.
2
120 2017 Westpac Group Annual Report
Related party disclosures
Details of our related party disclosures are set out in Note 40 to the financial statements and details of Directors’ interests in
securities are set out in the Remuneration Report included in the Directors’ Report.
Other than as disclosed in Note 40 to the financial statements and the Remuneration Report, if applicable, loans made to
parties related to Directors and other key management personnel of Westpac are made in the ordinary course of business on
normal terms and conditions (including interest rates and collateral). Loans are made on the same terms and conditions
(including interest rates and collateral) as they apply to other employees and certain customers in accordance with established
policy. These loans do not involve more than the normal risk of collectability or present any other unfavourable features.
Auditor’s remuneration
Auditor’s remuneration, including goods and services tax, to the external auditor for the years ended 30 September 2017 and
2016 is provided in Note 39 to the financial statements.
Audit related services
Westpac Group Secretariat monitors the application of the pre-approval process in respect of audit, audit-related and non-audit
services provided by PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) and promptly brings to the attention of the BAC any exceptions that need
to be approved pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(i)(C) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X. The pre-approval guidelines are
communicated to Westpac’s divisions through publication on the Westpac intranet.
During the year ended 30 September 2017, there were no fees paid by Westpac to PwC that required approval by the BAC
pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(i)(C) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X.
Financial statements
Income statements
Statements of comprehensive income
Balance sheets
Statements of changes in equity
Cash flow statements
Notes to the financial statements
Note 1 Financial statements preparation Note 24 Offsetting financial assets and financial liabilities
Note 25 Securitisation, covered bonds and other
Financial
performance Note 25 transferred assets
Note 2 Se
gment reporting
Note 3 Net interest income Other assets, other liabilities, commitments and
Note 4 Non-interest income contin
gencies
Note 5 O
perating expenses Note 26 Intangible assets
Note 6 Im
pairment charges Note 27 Other assets
Note 7 Income tax Note 28 Provisions
Note 8 Earnin
gs per share Note 29 Other liabilities
Note 9 Avera
ge balance sheet and interest rates Note 30 Operating lease commitments
Note 31 Contin
gent liabilities, contingent assets and
Financial assets and financial liabilities Note 31 credit commitments
Note 10 Receivables due from other financial institutions
Note 11 Tradin
g securities and financial assets Capital and dividends
Note 11 desi
gnated at fair value Note 32 Shareholders’ equity
Note 12 Available-fo
r-sale securities Note 33 Capital adequacy
Note 13 Loans Note 34 Dividends
Note 14 Provisions for im
pairment charges
Note 15 Life insurance assets and life Grou
p structure
Note 15 insurance liabilities Note 35 Investments in subsidiaries and associates
Note 16 Pa
yables due to other financial institutions Note 36 Structured entities
Note 17 De
posits and other borrowings
Note 18 Other financial liabilities at fair value throu
gh Employee benefits
Note 18 income statement Note 37 Share-based
payments
Note 19 Debt issues Note 38 Su
perannuation commitments
Note 20 Loan ca
pital
Note 21 Derivative financial instruments Other
Note 22 Financial risk Note 39 Auditor’s remuneration
Note 23 Fair values of financial assets and financial Note 40 Related
party disclosures
Note 23 liabilities Note 41 Notes to the cash flow statements
Note 42 Subse
quent events
Statutory statements
Directors’ declaration
Management’s report on internal control over financial reporting
Independent auditor’s report to the members of Westpac Banking Corporation
Report of independent registered public accounting firm
3
Financial statements
122 2017 Westpac Group Annual Report
Income statements for the years ended 30 September
Westpac Banking Corporation
Consolidated Parent Entity
$m Note 2017 2016 2015 2017 2016
Interest income 3 31,232 31,822 32,295 30,865 31,803
Interest expense 3 (15,716) (16,674) (18,028) (17,765) (19,182)
Net interest income 15,516 15,148 14,267 13,100 12,621
Non-interest income 4 6,286 5,837 7,375 6,131 4,617
Net operating income before operating expenses and impairment charges 21,802 20,985 21,642 19,231 17,238
Operating expenses 5 (9,434) (9,217) (9,473) (7,898) (7,572)
Impairment charges 6 (853) (1,124) (753) (870) (922)
Profit before income tax 11,515 10,644 11,416 10,463 8,744
Income tax expense 7 (3,518) (3,184) (3,348) (2,620) (2,437)
Net profit for the year 7,997 7,460 8,068 7,843 6,307
Profit attributable to non-controlling interests (7) (15) (56) - -
Net profit attributable to owners of Westpac Banking Corporation 7,990 7,445 8,012 7,843 6,307
Earnings per share (cents)
Basic 8 238.0 224.6 255.0
Diluted 8 229.3 217.8 248.2
The above income statements should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.
Financial statements
2017 Westpac Group Annual Report 123
Statements of comprehensive income for the years ended 30 September
Westpac Banking Corporation
Consolidated Parent Entity
$m
2017 2016 2015 2017 2016
Net profit for the year
7,997 7,460 8,068 7,843 6,307
Other comprehensive income
Items that may be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss
Gains/(losses) on available-for-sale securities:
Recognised in equity 75 56 (148) 88 71
Transferred to income statements (3) (8) (73) (3) (1)
Gains/(losses) on cash flow hedging instruments:
Reco
[TRUNCATED]
Data sourced from publicly available filings. Our datasets may not be complete. Automated analysis can produce errors. If you believe any data on this page is incorrect, please contact us at hello@nzxplorer.co.nz. For informational purposes only. Not investment advice.