ArborGen Holdings Limited logo

Rubicon Shareholder Documentation Despatched

Annual Report21 December 2017ARBIndustrials

To: NZX From: LUKE MORIARTY
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


Telephone: 64-9-356 9800

Fax: 64-9-356 9801




Further information on Rubicon Limited can be viewed at the Rubicon web site, at

http://www.rubicon-nz.com.








22 December 2017 - Rubicon confirms that its 2017 Annual Report and Notice of Meeting were

despatched to shareholders today.



END






Rubicon Shareholder Documentation

Despatched

---

Annual Report 2017

1
TheTheTheTheTheTheTheTheTheTThTheThre re re rere rerererrarearearareareareareareeareareestststststststssateateateateteateatetatetamenmemenmenmenmenmenmenenennnnnmmts tsts tsts ts ts tts tsstinininininininnnnintthtthththithihhihiththtttthhihis Rs Rss Rs Repoepoepoepoprt rrrtrtrththathathat atat arerereeeee‘fooooooooorwarwarwarwarwarrwarwwrdrddrdrd dloololooloolooolooooloookinkkinkinkinkinkinkinkinnnkg sg sg ssssstattattaemeememmmmemeememntsnts.’’ AAs thettthese eesee

forforforforforforforforforfoforfwawarwarwwawarwaawawarwwwawarwarwarwwwd-ld-ld-ld-ld-ldd-ld-ldd-lookookookookookkookokookoooooinginginginginginiingiingingngggstststtststststsateateaateaateateateateateateetateateamenmenmenmenmemememenmenmenmememenmemetsts ts ts tstststs tsts s starearareararerereareeararerprprprprprrprprprprprpediedididdiedieediediediedicticticticticticticticticctictivvvevveveveveein nnin in in inattnatnatnatnatnnatnanntuureurereureuruueu, t, t, t, t , t,theyheyheyheyheyheyheyhaaaraaae ssubjubjjjectectctctcteectc to a numuuuumummmberbebbeee

of of of ofof of of ofofoffrisrisrisisrisisrisisrisisrissks kks ks ks ksksskskkskandandandandddandandanddandanddandndunununununnunununuunununucercercercercercercercecercercercctaitaitaitaitaitataitaitaitaintintintintintintintintintiitieseses s s eseessss relrelrerelelelelelelelelreelllatiatiatiatiatiatiatiatitiatitiatiatitng nng ng ng ng ngng ng ngngng nggnggtototototototo tototRRRubRubRubRubRRububicoicoicoicoicocicocoocococoonnn,nn,n,nn,ananananandandananndnououououoouuooor TrTTTTTTTTeeeenoeeenn Cn Cnn nlealealeaaaalealrrworod dLimmmLimited dd

ParPaParParPaParPaPaParPararParPaPatnettnetnetnetnetnetnenenrshrshrshrshrshrshrshrshsipipippipipipipipipp(TC(TC(TC(TC(TC(TC(TC(TC(TCTC(TC(TC(TTCLP)LP)LP)LP)LP)LP)LP)LP)LP)LLP)LPLP)ananaanananannanaaaaaanaad Ad Ad Ad Ad AdAd Ad Ad AArborborbrborborborborborborborboboooborrGerGerGeGGrGerGerGerGerGerGeeGrGGGGGGn in in iin in ininin in iinvenvenvenvenvevevnvenvestmstmstmstmstmstmstmstmstmmmmentententententententententtenttennns,s,s,s,s,s,s,s,ss,s,s,ss,mmmanmanmanmananmananmannmanmmmmmnmmmannyyy oy of wfwhiccccccchhh ahree beyyyybeybeyybeyebononondonnononoo our crontnnnnrollllo..

AAsAsAsAsAsAsAsAsAsAAsa ra rara ra ra ra rresuesueesususuusuuusult,lt,lt,lt,lt,lt,lt,lt,lllacaacacacacacacaactuatuatuatuatuatuatuauauatuuaulrlrlrlrrlrl rrl rl rlrlrlresuesuesuesuesuesuesuesusuuusuesultsltsltsltstltsltsltsltsananananananand cd cd cd cd cd cd cd cdddondondondondondondonddndondonddondonddnitiitiitiitiiititiiitiitiittitittioonsonsonsonsnsonsonsonsoonsonnmmammy y dyddddddddddddydddyiffififfififfffffiffffffffffffffeeer er rrer rematmaterieally fyrooomooothhhosososeooososexxpreessessssessesd ooodooooooorrrr rrrr rr

impimpimpimpimpimpimpimpimpimpimpmpmmpplielielielielielielilieliliied bd bdd bd bd bd bd bddddby sy sy syssy sssuchuchuchuchuchuchchuchchuchstststtstststststtsatateateateaateateteateeateaamemenmmenmmenmmmmemenmenmenmennennmmts.tststs.ts.ts.sts.ss.

IIn InIInIInInnIparparpparpparparpaaptictictictictictictiulaulaulaulaulauuulaulaurrr,rrTCLTCLTCLTCLTCLTCLCLCLTCLTCLTCTCP’sP’sP’sP’s’P’sP’sP’sP’sPPP’sPsPsopopoopopopopopoopopopperaeraeraeererereraertiotitititittitioiotinsnsnandndnaaaaaarereeeeeeesssulsulssssts sarearerererrersssissisgnignfi cficantnttttnly linflnflflfl uencececceceececed bbd bd bd bd bd bd bbd bddy ty ty tyy ty tty tttttyhehhhehe hehehehehehehe he eee hlevllelelelevleleeevleeveleeel el el lelel elel el eelel ell

oof offoooactactaaiviivivty ty tytytytytyty tyty yy tyy yty yiniiniiinininniitheththethethetheththeetheevvaaaaaarriorioriorirriorioous ussecsecsesesesesesstortors os osf ttfhe he ecoeconomnomomomooiiesiesiiniwhwich itopopopoopoppppppperaeraeraeraeraeraeraeraeeeetestestestesttetesteses((((p(p(artartartartartartartartartartartartrttarticuicuicuicuicucuicuicuicuicuicuicucccuclarlarlarlarlarlararlarlarlarararararlarlaaalylly ly ly yly ly ly ly yly ylyyllyly

AusAAAAusAuusAusAAAAtraaaaaalasassllasia,,,,,EuEuEuroproppproproppprope,e,e,,eanaaanananndaaannannaanNNoooooooooorthrthrrhAmAmAmmmmmmmmmmerieerica)ca)c. F. Flucctuatuatiotions in industtttttttriariariariariaiariaririarialol ol olololl olol oooutputputpututputputputputputputputputputputptputut,uuuuuuuucocooooooooooooooommemmemmemmemmemmemmemmemmmmememmmemmemmemmmmmmemrcircircircircircircircircircircircirial al al allallalalalaala

naandndndandnareeeeesididsidsidddssdienntntnialialialallliialcococccconsnsnnstnsrucruuuucurrutiooooooonnnnnnn aannnnnctitictivitvitvitviviviviiviviviyy,capcapitaital al avaivlablaility, housussisisiisisissisissisiingng ngngng ggg ng gngng nngturturturtttururururrturrrtururrrnovnovnovnovnovnovnovnovnovnovnovnovnovnovnovnovnovnvnover er erer er erer er er rrer errer aandandandandaandandandandandndandndnddndprprprprprprrprrppppriciiciiciiciiciiciiciiciiciciiciiciiciicng,ng,ng,ng,ngnggng,ng,ngng,nnnng

llevlevevlevevevlevelselselselselselsoffoffffffrerereereererererpaipaiiprs,rsrs,s,rsrs,s,rerereeeremodmmmodmmmmelelllinnggannd ad addditiotions to exiesting homomomomomommomooes,es,seeesssneneneneenneneneeeneeew ww w hwhww ww w ousousououoususssingingingingngngngingisststststststststtstttstststttartartartartartaartartartrtartartartarartartararrarars,s,sss,s,s,s,sss,sss,,

erelrelreleleative vvevexexexcexcexexceeeceehhanhanhahanhanhanhanhanhge gegegege geratratratatatratatratratarataes es (pa(partiicucularlarlyy the NZ dollar, the EEEurEuEurEurEuro,oo,o,anddththththhhthththe Ue Ue UUUee eeUeS dSdSdSddS dS dS dddoolloollollollolollllolloollar)ar)ar)ar)r)aar)ar)aaara,,,,,,

intnniininnereeerrest sssssratratttttttes,es,ssssss,annanaand dd ppdddrrrrrrofiofitatabililbityityoof customers, can each havvvveee ae aee ae substbstbstbstaaaaantaiiiialaliii impacat ott oooooooonn nnnnn

TCLTCTCTCTCP’sssrereeeeesususususulsusuuts ssssof offoffooopeopeopeopepeeprrratatrrionionnnnnns as s as s aas s sasssssnd ndfi nancial condition. Otherr rrr rrrisrks ks ks kincincincincludludldludulludllleece ce ce ceeeompmmometiiiiitortortortortotrt

propropropropropropducdudduduct ddddt dddddt deevevevloploploplpopoomenmeneennmememennetttt,ttt,proprooodudducdududucdududdt dt dt ddt ddt emaemeeeend and pricing,innputputcocococococococcoocstsstsstsstssstsstsststst, l, l, l, ,ll, l, l, ogggogogoggog og gavaavaaaaavaavaailabilbibiiityyy, a, aaa, aaandndd nddd dd

cusuuutommeer ereconconcononnonncencencencencencenntratratratratratratrtrratiotiotioioioiotttiottioiotin rn riskiskkiskiskiskkskksksk.

ArbArArArArAorGren’en’en’en’’en’’ss s rss rrsiskkkkiss aaas as aas aaand ddnd nd ndnddndndnd ndnuncununcncncuncncncncnceeeerterteereainaintietieeetieeetits is isss iiiiiiinclnclnclnclnclnclnclncncnclncnudeududeudeudeudeudeudeudedde(i((((((n addidtion tttttoto tooohoshhohe neneneneoteoteoteoteoted adadd aaaad ad ad abobooovvovoe in rnnelaelattiiotiotttttnnn n n n

tototooTCLLLP)P))))PP- -- t---t- tt-t- tt- t-heheheheheegloglogloglogglobalbbalbalbabalbalbalbalammammrkerkekrkeeekeeketts ts ttstsandandandandandandananddndandandndddandagggegegeeegegeeggggeogrgaphaphphhphhhhphphaphaiesiesiesesesiesiiesiesiessinininininininininninnnwhwhwhwhwhwhwhwhwhwwichichichichichichchichiichchitiiitiiopopooerateses(p(partarticuiclarlarlarlarlarly lylylylySouoSouuuuouuuSoSothhh hh thht

AmeAmericricricricriciiiciirircaaaaaaa,a,a,aaa,aaaaaNoNorNorNorNorNorNororNthtththAmeAmeeAmeAmericricrrcccccccca,aa,a,a,aa,,,,andandanandandandandandandanandandanddAAuAuAuAAuAuAuAuAAuAAstststststrstrstrststttrtstrsttsaaaaalalalaaasssiasiasiaiaaasaaaaa),),),),),),)),)),,,),),,)intintintintintinnnellellellelellellellellellelleelleeectectectectectectectectectectualualualualualualualaualualualualualualalprprprprprprprprprprrppopepeopeopeopepeopeopeopeopepopopeopeppprtyrtyrtyrtyrtyrtyrtyrtyrtyrtyrtytrtrtrtyprprprprprprprprprprpprppoteoteooootection,n

regregegeggregregregregregegereulaulaulaulaulaulatortorortortortortoororory ay ay y apprpprprprpprpprprrpprrppprpprpprpprppovovoovaovaovaovavaovavaaovovaovavals,ls,ls,ls,ls,ls,sls,spupupupupupupuuupupupupupuupbliblibliblbblibblibllibliblilc ac ac ac ac ac ac acacac and ndnd nd nd nd nd nd nd ddcuscuscuscuscuscuscuscuscuscucuscustomtomtomtomtomtomtomtomtomtomomommoeererererrerrer er erer er erer eaaaccaccaccaccaccaccaccaccacccccepteptepteeptepteptteptepteptteptteptpteptancancancancancancancancanancancancnacnccane oe oe oe oe oe oe oeoe oeoeoof gf gf gf gf gf gf gf gf gff gf gfggeneeneeneeneeneeneeneneeneeneneetictictictictictictictiticciccciallallallallallallallalllllalllllally y ey ey ey ey ey ey eey ey eyy eyy y y ngingingingingiginginginingingigiingneennneeneneeneneeeeneeneeeeeneeeeredrereredredrerereerer

proproproproproproproproprorodddducdducducdducductsts,ts,ts,tstssththththththththththththe eee re re re r rrateateateateateateateaeaaaofofofofofofofofcucucucucucucuucuuuuucucucuuustostostostostostostostostostostottotoomermermermerermermermermeerermermerradadadadadadaddadadaaddoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptopionionioionionionionionionnonionnnofofofofofofffofofoffoofoadadadadadadadadadadadadddvanvanvanvanvanvavanvananvannavanvcedcedcedcedcedcedcedcedcedcedcedcecesseseseseseeeseseseseeseedledledledledledledledledlllldingingingingingingingingingingingingprprprprprprprprprprprpoduoduoduoduoduoduoduoduododuoductsctscctsctctsctstsctststsstcts, t, t t, t, t, t, ttt t, the he he he he he hehe hhehehehesucsucsusususucsucucsucsucsuucuucscescescescescesceseescesceses s s s sss

of of ofArbArArbArbArbArbArbrbrbArbbrbrbrrbArborGorGorGorGororGorGorGorGorGrGooroGGoenenen’en’en’en’en’en’n’en’enenes rs rs rs rsrs rrsseseeseeseeseeseeseeseeeseeseesesarcarcarcarcarcarcrarccarcarcarcrcarcchah ahaah ah aah ah ah ahhahahaahand nd nd ndnd dndndnd dnd d ndndevdevddevdevdevdevdevdevdevdedevdedevdeloeloeloeloeloeloeloeloeloeloloeloeloeepmepmepmepmepmepmpmepmemment nt nt ntntntnt ntntntttttactactactactactactactctcctcciviiviiviiviiviiviviiviviiviivivvitietietietietietietieietietieeeiettiessss,s,s,s,ssss,weaweaweaweaweaweaweaweaweaweaweawweaweawethththethethethethethethethethethetttheer cr cr cr r cr cr cr crr crcrondondondondondondondondondondnndoditiitiitiitiitititiititititiiitonsonsonsonsonsonsonsononsonsnns, c, c, c, c, c, cccccccc,coneoneoneoneoneeoneoneoneoneooononeoeananananananananannanannaadsd sd sd sdd sd sdsssd seedeedeedeedeedeedeedeedeedededeeeeed

inviiinvinvinvententeentententententntententenntennttoryooryoryoryoryoryoryoryooryoryoryy, b, b, b, b, b, bb, b, b, bb, bbbbiolioliolioliololioliolioliolioliooogiogiogiogiogioogogogiogogogcalcalcalcalcalcalcalcalccalccalccmamamamamamamamaaaamaamaattettettettettettettettettetttttttrs,rs,rs,rs,rs,rs,rs,rs,rsrs,aanananananannnananannad td td td td td d td td tdd td tddhehehe he he he he he hehehhfacfacfacfacaccfacccfacfaccct tt tt tt tt tt tt tt ttt tthhathathathaththhahathahathhathathathhatArArArArArArArArArArAAArAArborborborborborborborbororborborborboroGenGenGenGenGenGenGenGenGenGenGeneeenn’s ’s ’s ’s’s’s’s’s ’s ’s’s ’s sannannannannannannannannannannnnnnannnualualualualuaualualualualualccrcrcrcrcrcrcrrrropsopsopsopsopsopopsopsoppoopananad sd d dsssssssssseedeedeedeedeedeedeedeeddeedee

orcorcorcorcoooooharharhhharharharharharharharharharhhaharrds ds ds dsds dsds ds ddsdsdsddarearearearerearearererereareareaarnononononononononont tt tt tt tt tt tt tt ttttttttttthe he he he hehhehe he hehee ehhhhsubsubsubsubsubsubsubsubsubsubsububsubbubujecjecjecjejecjecjecejecjeccecect ot ot ot ot ot otot ot ot ooofif if if if if if iif if ififfnsunsunsunsunsunsunsnsusnsunsunnnsranranraranranranannannnracece ce ccee ceceece ce e coccovcovcovcocovcovovcovcovcovovccvccoer.er.er.er.er.er.er.r.rer.eer.erer.r

AsAsAsAsAsAsAAsAsAsAsAAAsAAAsAa ra ra ra ra rraa rarara raaa esuesuesusuesuesuesuesuesueesuuuuult lt ltlt ltlt t lt lt ltlt tltltlof of of of ofofofofofof of oofothethethethethethethethethehtheheethetetfofffofoffoffofofofofoffofrererrerereregregegrererrroinoinninininnnng, acactactactctctctctactctctacactatualualualualualualualualualualuauaurererererererrerrererrsusulsulsulsulsuusulsullsulsulsulustststststsstsandandandandandandandccocococococococooccnclnclnclnclncllnclnclnclnclncnclnclcnusiusiusiusiusiusiusiusiiususiusiusiusiusonsonsonsonsonsonsonsonsonsonsonooomamammammamamamamamaay dy dy dy dy ddy dy dydy ddy diffiffiffiffiffiffifffiifififfifffffffer er er erer errerrematmatmamatmatmatmatatmaatmamamaterierieriererierierierierieririeeririallallallallallallallallallalallllyfy fy ffy fy fy fyyyy fyromromomromomrommmmmromrommro

thothothothothothothothothothotthse sese se seseseseseseeseesssexpexpexpexpexpexpexpexpexppxexpxpxexresresresresesresesressesresesssesssedsedsedsedsedsedsedsedsedsedseddsseddsesssororororororororororrorimiimimimimimimimimimmmmmplipliplipliplipliplpliplipliliplilplilieded ed ed ededed edededdeddeby yy y byyyysusucsucsucsucsuususuccucuh sh sh sh sh sshshshhsstattattatattattattatatattattatatatattemeemeemeemeemeemeemmmeemementsntsntntsntsntsntsntntststs...

AllAllAllAllAllAllAllAAllAAllrererererererrererererreferferferferferferferferfererrferferreenceencencencencencencenceencencnces es eseses eseessesesseininin inin in ininininninnthithithithithithithththiththiththis ds dsds ds dsds dsdsds dsdddocuocuocuocuococuocuocuocuocuocuuocococouccmenmenmenmenmenmenmenmememenmenmenmenmeeeet tt ttttttt ttt tt tt tttto co co co co o cccccoocurrurrurrururrurrurrurrurrurrurrrrrrencencencencencencenceeeneiesiesiesiesiesiesssiesieseararararararararrarre ae ae aeae a ae aeaeaeaaaaes ss ssssssss ss ss ss ss sssssstattattatattattatttattttattated ed eded eddd dedededdd d– i–i–i– i– i– i– i– i–– i–i.e..e.e.e..e..e..e..e..e.eee.e.USUUSUUSUUSUSSUSUSSSSUUUSUS$$$,$,$,$,$,$,$,$$$,$$,NZ$NZ$NZ$NZ$NZ$NZ$NZ$NZ$NNZ$NZ$NZ$Z$NZ$NZZ$NZ$NZ$ananananananananananannnannad Ed Ed EdEd EdEd EdEd EEEEd Ed Eddddurourourourourourourourourouurourouu.....

TaTaTaTaTaaablblblblbbblblblblblbbblblbllleee eeeeeeee eofofofofofofofoffofofofCCCCCCCCCCCCConononononononooonononntetetetetetetetettetetetntntntntntntntntnnntntntttsssssssssss

ChChChChChhaiaiaaaaiaiaaiaaaiairmrmrmrmrmrmmrmmmrmmmrananaananananananana’s’s’s’s’s’s’ssLLLLLLLetetetetetetettetettetetetetetetetr.r.r.r.r.r.r......................................................................................................................................................................222222222222

FiFFiFiFiFiFiFiFiFiFiFnanaananananananananaaancncncnccncncncnccncnncncniaiaiaiaaiaiaiaiaiaaiaiaiaiaallllllllllStStStStStStStStStStStStSStStSStataatatattatatatatataataatememmemmemmmemeeemmemmememmmeneeeneenenenennenennetsttttststtttsss.......................................................................................................................................8888888888888888

AuAuAuAuAuddidddddididtotootr’r’’’ssssssssssssRReReepopopopooopooooooortrttttttttrtt............................................................................................................................................................................................................443434343434343433434334

GoGoGoGoGoGoGooGGoGGoGveveveveveveevvvvrnnnrnrnnrnrnaanaanananannannaacecece..............................................................................................................................................................................44444444444444488888888888 8

BBBoooBooBooararararaaaaraadddofofoffoffoffoffDDDDDDDDiririririririreececctototoooorsrsrs..........................................................................................................................6666666644

IInInInInInIvvevevestststttsorororooroIIIIInfnfnfnfororororororrrrrrmamaaamaamammmmammmmmtttitititiiiiiiiiiiononononononnooonononnononn............................................................................................................................................... OOOOBCBCBCCCBCBC

2
On 30 May 2017, we announced that our balance date was to change from 30 June to 30 September, effective this year.

Accordingly, this Report covers the 15 months from 1 July 2016 through to 30 September 2017.

In our last Interim Review in February this year, we outlined our immediate objectives as being to –

• “See a positive conclusion to the Tenon Strategic Review and Clearwood sales process; and

• Reach agreement with our ArborGen Partners as to the appropriate funding and value extraction path going forward.

Once these two matters are behind us, the value path for Rubicon will be much clearer for shareholders. We would expect this clarity

will emerge prior to 30 June this year.”

All of this was achieved in the period since those words were written. As you will understand, in order to resolve all of those goals,

the period under review was necessarily dominated by signifi cant transactional activity, all of which was very successfully completed.

It is worth briefl y summarising that activity and the outcomes here –

Tenon – US distribution businesses

• After a full sales process had been run, these activities were sold to a US private equity entity for US$110 million.

• The price was equivalent to 7.3 x Tenon’s 2016 EBITDA

(1)

for these businesses.

• The transaction closed on 2 December 2016.

• All Tenon’s net debt was then repaid.

• Following that, a (fi rst) pro-rata capital return to Tenon shareholders of US$71 million was made on 23 December 2016.

• Rubicon received US$43 million in cash from that fi rst capital return.

Tenon – NZ clearwood manufacturing and (related) global distribution business

• A separate full sales process was also run for this business.

• The business was sold to the Tenon Clearwood Limited Partnership (TCLP) - a private consortium of investors and Rubicon

(2)

, for

US$55 million.

• This price was within the Grant Samuel independent valuation range of US$52-62.5 million.

• Rubicon effectively reduced its ownership

(2)

of the Clearwood business in this process, freeing up US$11 million to be applied to

the ArborGen acquisition.

• The business is structured as a limited partnership, which offers full fl exibility as to future ownership changes for its investors.

• Rubicon operates as the TCLP general partner, managing TCLP’s day-to-day operations.

CChhaiiiiirrrmmmaannnnnnnnnnnnnnnn’’sssss LLLLLeeeeeeeeettttteeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeerrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

3
• The transaction closed on 28 April 2017.

• Debt of US$23.5 million was applied to the acquisition, within TCLP itself.

• A (second) capital return to Tenon shareholders of US$43 million was made on 28 April 2017.

• Rubicon received US$25 million in cash from that second capital return.

Tenon – residual activities

• With the completion of the (above) two sales processes there are now no operating businesses remaining in Tenon, and shareholders

have voted in favour of Tenon being voluntarily liquidated.

• Given the disposition of all its businesses and the two returns of capital that have already been made to shareholders, Tenon now

only has residual ‘clean-up’ bills to pay, leaving a small fi nal cash balance yet to be returned to shareholders.

• We believe Tenon will make a fi nal capital return of ~ US$4.5 million in Q1 of calendar 2018.

• Rubicon’s share of the fi nal capital return is expected to be ~ US$2.6 million.

ArborGen

• Rubicon acquired the ownership interests of International Paper and WestRock in ArborGen Inc, for US$28.5 million.

• Rubicon now owns 100% of ArborGen’s issued share capital, and has a 95% economic interest in the company (given there are

5% of warrants owned by ex-Cellfor investors relating to that acquisition in 2012).

• The acquisition closed on 29 June 2017.

• The deal contains a deferred settlement component, to align with Rubicon’s funding capacity.

• US$13.5 million was paid on closing, US$5 million is to be paid on 31 December 2017, and a fi nal instalment of US$10 million is

to be paid on 30 June 2018.

• Since acquisition, we have chosen to strengthen ArborGen’s balance sheet by the injection of permanent capital of US$6 million,

and we have also advanced US$5 million in working capital lines.

• All of ArborGen’s existing bank lenders have continued bank lines post Rubicon’s acquisition.

As you can imagine, an enormous amount of effort went in to getting ourselves to this desired end-position. In doing so, we

have had strong fi nancial support from our two largest shareholders – Knott Partners and Libra – both of whom injected capital

into Rubicon in June this year (Libra US$9 million and Knott Partners US$3.5 million), in order to strengthen our balance sheet

position. The table on the following page summarises the big picture movements in cash that have occurred over the reporting

period.

CCCCCCChhhaaiirrrrrmmmannn’’ss LLeeetttttttteeeeerr

4
CChhaiiiiirrrmmmaannnnnnnnnnnnnnnn’’sssss LLLLeeeeeeeeettttteeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeerrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

US$ millions In Out Balance

Cash receipt from 1st Tenon capital return 43

Cash receipt from 2nd Tenon capital return 25

Dividend receipt from Tenon 2

Capital injection from Knott and Libra 13

83

Investment into TCLP (14)

ArborGen acquisition-day payment (14)

Repayment of Rubicon debt (20)

Repayment of Rubicon sub-debt (2)

Capital investment into ArborGen (6)

Working capital advances into ArborGen (5)

Other (e.g. acquisition costs, admin, etc) (3)

(64)

Cash movement (and balance) at Rubicon Limited* 19

Cash balance at ArborGen 3

Cash balance at TCLP 4

Cash balance at Tenon 5

Cash and liquid deposits per Consolidated Balance Sheet 31

* includes $6m cash on deposit with Synovus Bank to secure ArborGen’s debt facility

As the table shows, we ended the period with a cash balance of US$19 million. From a balance sheet leverage perspective, and taking

a conservative view by using our market capitalisation as the equity number, our interest bearing debt (net of cash)

(3)

as a percentage

of debt plus equity

(3)

was 27.2% at balance date. If US$15 million in outstanding ArborGen acquisition deferred settlement payments

is included, the leverage moves to 37.4%.

Operationally, moving forward, we have two businesses to report on – TCLP and ArborGen.

For the 15-month period, TCLP (inclusive of the Tenon Clearwood business prior to the formation of TCLP in April 2017) recorded

EBITDA of US$12 million, on revenue of US$108 million. Since its formation on 28 April 2017, TCLP recorded EBITDA of US$4.6 million

for the 5 months through to 30 September 2017. These numbers are in line with the Grant Samuel independent report prepared for

Tenon’ shareholders earlier this year, which estimated EBITDA of US$10.5 million (before General Partner fees) for the 12 months to

30 June 2017.

5
Moving forward, the currency environment continues to be diffi cult to read, particularly the NZD:USD cross rate which has once

again proved to be extremely volatile, operating within a very broad range of 68-75 cents over the past 6 months alone, and

weakening post the NZ parliamentary election results to below 70 cents again. Similarly, the NZD:Euro has moved down across the

period, to now be under 60 cents. Offsetting these positives, we have seen some order fi le weakness in Europe and the US, however

we believe that to be temporary only, and assuming the cross rates behave themselves we are forecasting TCLP earnings for the 12

months to 31 March 2018 (i.e. TCLP’s own fi scal year) of circa US$9.5 million (net of General Partner fees of US$250k).

All partners (including Rubicon) have confi rmed that over the initial years of TCLP’s life, the business will concentrate strongly on

debt-reduction. TCLP is required to reduce its acquisition debt by US$4.3 million per year, which we have already programmed in,

with the fi rst payment of US$2.1 million occurring on 31 December this year. In addition, the facility has certain standard fi nancial

covenants

(4)

which we are comfortable will be met moving forward.

In our Interim Review we set the ArborGen operational goals for the current year as being to –

• Lift total revenue by 12.5%+ ... to more than US$40 million

• Increase average sales price (ASP) in the US year-on-year ... on fl at US volumes

• Lift global loblolly and radiata advanced-genetics pine sales to approach 30% of the total

• Meet the EBITDA break-even goal, inclusive of the full expensing of all R&D (i.e. US GAAP).

Whilst the fi nancial results included in our fi nancial statements are for a 15-month period, the following data has been extracted

such that it aligns with the period set for the above goals – i.e. ArborGen’s 12 month fi nancial year (rather than the full 15-month

accounting period reported here).

The comparable results are as follows –

• Total Revenue rose by 21% ... to US$44 million

• ASP in the US lifted 7% y-o-y ... on US volumes of 270 million

• Global loblolly and radiata advanced-genetics pine sales as a percentage of the total, was 29%

• ArborGen recorded EBITDA of US$1.7 million, inclusive of full R&D expensing.

Put another way, the objectives that had been set for the period were fully met.

Importantly, ArborGen met and comfortably exceeded its fundamental EBITDA break-even goal, with a US GAAP audited EBITDA

result of US$1.7 million. By US GAAP, we mean the result that ArborGen would report in a US ‘listing’ situation. This involves the

full expensing of all R&D activities (US$5.5 million), as US GAAP does not allow capitalisation of those costs. Pre R&D, ArborGen

recorded EBITDA of US$7.2 million (again, US GAAP).

CCCCCCChhhaaiirrrrrmmmaannn’’ss LLeeettttttttteeeeerr

6
In contrast with US GAAP, in Rubicon’s fi nancial statements IFRS require us to capitalise ArborGen’s development spend and expense

its research spend, however we are also required each year to amortise a portion of the ArborGen intellectual property that we carry

on our balance sheet relating to our acquisition of ArborGen. Inclusive of these IFRS accounting requirements, we have reported a

US$3.9 million EBITDA contribution from ArborGen in Rubicon’s fi nancial statements for the 15-month period under review.

Overall, 351 million seedlings were produced globally, up 8%+ on the 324 million reported in the prior year – 270 million in the

US inclusive of more than 60 million in MCP and varietals, 19 million in ANZ, and 62 million in Brazil (a more than doubling of the

prior year’s 30 million, 53 million of which was eucalyptus). ArborGen’s consolidated revenues increased by 21% to US$44 million,

and gross margin lifted to US$15 million (excluding depreciation and amortisations). We believe the past year has defi ned a turning

point in ArborGen’s fi nancial performance, clearly showing the operating leverage that exists within the business moving forward.

Future performance is, of course, dependent upon ArborGen delivering on its basic value proposition – i.e. continuously increasing

advanced-genetics volumes as a percentage of its total unit sales. We hold a strong belief that ArborGen can deliver on that

promise, however we are also aware that in biological businesses it is never a straight line to the fi nish. Short-term events can upset

the trend line. This year two hurricanes struck the US – Harvey (through Texas) and Irma (through Florida). ArborGen was fortunate

that neither event infl icted any material damage on its current year crop, and more importantly on its nursery and orchard facilities.

However, some of the crop that is being grown for customers in the current season may not now be uplifted, as there may be

insuffi cient time for foresters to prepare the land for planting this year. Although we do not yet know what the exact impact of this

on the current (i.e. ArborGen’s March ’18 year) season will be, the current expectation is that operating EBITDA will still more than

double the $1.7 million recorded last year.

The change in the New Zealand government following the recent election process has seen the announcement of new policies

favourable towards the NZ forest industry, and which, in support of climate change, also include a stated goal of expanding the

number of trees planted domestically each year. We have yet to see the detail (e.g. species, regions, etc) of this policy, other than

that a target of 100 million trees per annum being planted in NZ has been widely stated. ArborGen-NZ currently produces around

16 million treestocks per annum, so there is clearly upside for it should this policy be implemented in a managed manner.

As would be expected, as the new 100% owner of ArborGen, we are now undertaking a complete review of the strategic,

operating and fi nancial plan necessary to ensure ArborGen meets its promise. This is a major exercise that will not be completed

until the new calendar year, but once concluded it will represent the blue-print against which the business’ measurable milestones

will be set. We will report on this next year.

As to Governance matters, in September, following the ArborGen acquisition, Ranjan Tandon, who is the Principal of Libra (a very

successful New York hedge fund) which now owns 17.6% of Rubicon, became a Director of Rubicon. Knott Partners retains a

28.2% interest in Rubicon, and together Knott and Libra represent almost half of our share register, with both investors now having

direct Board seat representation, and the ability to provide direction for the Company moving forward. Bill Hasler (a founding

director of Rubicon) and George Karaplis have each indicated their intention to retire from the Board next month. They have

contributed strongly to the Company over an extended period of time, which has included the GFC, the restructuring and sale of

Tenon, and the acquisition of ArborGen. We are extremely grateful for their assistance through all of that period, and we wish them

well for the future.

Chairman’s Letter

7
Moving now to the Outlook, where at TCLP, we will be continuing the relentless operational improvement focus that is engrained

in that business, in order to achieve our year-end earnings forecast. Rubicon is expecting to receive its fi rst dividend payment of

approximately US$0.7 million from TCLP late next month (i.e. December). All surplus cash generated will be utilised to reduce the

outstanding acquisition debt in the partnership. At ArborGen, the focus will be on minimising the impact of Hurricanes Harvey and

Irma on the current (new) year’s fi nancial result, and on the completion of the revised plan for the company which is now underway.

We will also be looking to close-out the ArborGen acquisition with the deferred acquisition-payments of US$5 million and US$10

million to be made on 31 December 2017 and 30 June 2018 respectively.

We will update you on these business goals as we progress through the year.

As usual, I would like to thank all our stakeholders for their continued support – it is very much appreciated.

Sincerely,

Stephen Kasnet

Chairman (on behalf of the Board)

24 November 2017

(

1) EBITDA (i.e. Earnings before Interest, Taxation, Depreciation and Amortisations) is a non-GAAP earnings fi gure that equity analysts tend to focus

on for comparable company performance, because that number removes distortions caused by differences in asset ages, depreciation policies, and

debt:equity structures. Refer also to note 30 of our 30 September 2017 Annual Audited Financial Statements.

(2) Rubicon has a 44.88% equity ownership position in TCLP, and by virtue of voting rights assigned to Rubicon by certain TCLP investors it has a 50.01%

voting control interest in TCLP . Rubicon is also the General Partner of the TCLP . Refer also to note 26 of our 30 September 2017 Annual Audited

Financial Statements.

(3) Net interest bearing debt (net of cash) is $25 million, calculated as Term debt ($33 million) + Current debt ($18 million) + Capital lease ($13 million)

less TCLP/Tenon minority share of term and current debt ($12 million) less Cash and liquid deposits ($31 million) plus TCLP/Tenon minority share of cash

($4 million). Market equity is $67 million, calculated as 487.9 million shares x 19 cents x 72.35 cents (the FX rate at balance date). Book equity is $150

million, as per the Consolidated Balance Sheet in our 30 September 2017 Annual Audited Financial Statements.

(4) Refer note 18 to our 30 September 2017 Annual Audited Financial Statements.

CCCCCCChhhaaiirrrrrmmmaannn’’ss LLeeettttttttteeeeerr

8
RURUBBICOICOICON LN LLLNIMIMIMIIIMTTEDTEDANAANANAD SSUBSIDIIDIIDAARRRIREEESS SSSSS SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS

CConsssoolliidddaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaattttteeeeeeeeeeeeedddddddddd IIInncccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooommmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSStttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaatttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttteeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeemmmeeeennnnttt

FFoorr ththhhhhhhhththhhhhhhheeeeeeeeeeeeeeee151mmoonooooooooooothhss ssss ssssssssssssssssssssssseneeeneeeeeeeedededdddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddd30SSeepepeeeppeppppptetetetteteteeeeeteteteeeeteeeembmbmbmbmmmbmbmbmbmbbmbmmbmmmbmbmbmbmbmmbbbbbmbmbmbbmbmbmbmbmbbbmbmbmbmbmbbbmbmbmbbmbbmbmmmmmmbmbbererereeereere22222222220101010100101010101001010101010101101011011101011011011101011077777777777777777777777777777

RUBICON GROUP

Notes

15 months

Sep 2017

US$m

Re-presented

(1)

Year ended

June 2016

US$m

Revenue11590

Cost of sales7 (90)(71)

Gross earnings2519

Change in fair value of biological assets114–

Earnings by associate1511

Distribution expense7(12)(9)

Administration expense7(9)(6)

Operating earnings excluding items below95

Net fair value gain152–

Operating earnings before fi nancing expense115

Financing expense(4)(2)

Earnings before taxation73

Tax expense8– –

Net earnings after taxation from continuing operations73

Net earning after taxation from discontinued operations31(13)(27)

Net Earnings(6)(24)

Attributable to:

Rubicon shareholders(6)(16)

Minority shareholders–(8)

Net Earnings(6)(24)

Basic / diluted earnings per share information (cents per share)(1.4)(3.9)

Continuing operations 0.7–

Discontinued operations(2.1)(3.9)

Weighted average number of shares outstanding (millions of shares)425409

(1)

The year ended 30 June 2016 has been re-presented to show net profi t after taxation from discontinued operations separately.

The accompanying notes form part of and are to be read in conjunction with these fi nancial statements.

9
RURUBRUBRUBRUBRUICOCOOCOIONNNNNN LLLIMIIIMIITEDTEDTEAANAD SD SUBSSUIDIDIIIAARRRIAARES S

CCCCCCCoooonnssssssoooolliidddaaatteeddd SSSSStttttaaaaattteeemmmeeeennntttt ooooff CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooommmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmppppppppppppppppprrrrreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeehhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeennnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnssiiivvvvvvvvveeeeeee IInnnnncccccccccoommmmeee

FFoFor ththhheeee15151mmmononothththhtsssseenenendededddd330 Seepptetmmbmerrerr2222220117777

RUBICON LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES

Statement in Changes in Equity

For the 15 months ended 30 September 2017

RUBICON GROUP

15 months

Sep 2017

US$m

Year ended

June 2016

US$m

Net Earnings(6)(24)

Items that may be reclassifi ed to the Consolidated Income Statement:

Movement in currency translation reserve3(1)

Movement in hedge reserve–1

Other comprehensive income (net of tax)3–

Total comprehensive income(3)(24)

Total comprehensive income attributable to:

Rubicon shareholders(3) (17)

Minority shareholders–(7)

Total comprehensive income(3)(24)

RUBICON GROUP

Notes

15 months

Sep 2017

US$m

Year ended

June 2016

US$m

Total comprehensive income(3)(24)

Movement in Rubicon shareholders’ equity:

Issue of shares1913 –

Movement in minority shareholders’ equity:

Capital investment by minority2117–

Capital return from Tenon21(46)–

Dividend paid by Tenon21(1)(2)

Total movement in shareholder equity attributable to:

Rubicon shareholders’ equity10(17)

Minority shareholders’ equity(30)(9)

Opening equity attributable to:

Rubicon shareholders140157

Minority shareholders4049

Opening total Group equity180206

Closing equity attributable to:

Rubicon shareholders150140

Minority shareholders211040

Closing Total Group Equity160

180

The accompanying notes form part of and are to be read in conjunction with these fi nancial statements.

RURUBBICOICOICON LN LLLNIMIMIMIIIMTTEDTEDANAANANAD SSUBSIDIIDIIDAARRRIREEESS SSSSS SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
CConsssoolliidddaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaattttteeeeeeeeeeeeedddddddddd SSStttaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaatttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttteeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeemmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeennnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnntttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooffffffffffffff CCaaaasssshhh FFFFFlllooowwwwsssss

FFoorrththhhthhhhhthhhhhheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee151mmmmmmoonoooonoooooththss sssssssss ssssssssssssssssseneeeeeneeeeeeeddeddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddd303SSeepeepeppppepeptetetetteteeeteeteteeeteeteeeetetembmbmbbmbbbbmbmbmmbmmbmbmbbbbmmbmbmmmbbmbmbmbbbmbmbmbmbmbbbmbmbmbbmbbmbmbmmmmmmbmbbererereeeerere222222222201010010101010010101010110101101101011011101010100110111010110101117777777777777777777777777777777

RUBICON GROUP

Notes

15 months

Sep 2017

US$m

Year ended

June 2016

US$m

Cash was provided from operating activities

Receipts from customers275428

Cash provided from operating activities275428

Payments to suppliers, employees and other(278)(395)

Tax paid–(1)

Cash (used in) operating activities(278)(396)

Net cash from (used in) operating activities(3)

32

Sale of Tenon North American operations107–

Investment in fi xed assets13(4)(5)

Investment in associate15–(4)

Investment in subsidiaries15(14)–

Investment in intellectual property14(1)–

Cash in subsidiaries accquired2–

Net cash from (used in) investing activities90(9)

Debt drawdowns5218

Debt repayment(89)(29)

Interest paid(4)(5)

Issue of shares13–

Minority shareholders’ cash fl ow by way of:

Capital return from Tenon21(46)–

Capital investment by minority2117–

Dividend paid by Tenon21(1)(2)

Net cash from (used in) fi nancing activities(58)

(18)

Net movement in cash295

Opening cash, liquid deposits and overdrafts2(3)

Closing Cash, Liquid Deposits and Overdrafts31

2

Net Earnings (6)(24)

Adjustment for:

Financing expense45

Depreciation and amortisations743

Taxation–3

Earnings from associate(1)(1)

Change in fair value of biological assets(4)–

Other non cash items1334

Cash fl ow from operations before net working capital movement10 20

Trade and other receivables1(2)

Inventory(14)9

Trade and other payables– 5

Net working capital movement(13)12

Net cash from operating activities(3)32

The accompanying notes form part of and are to be read in conjunction with these fi nancial statements.

10

11
RURUBRUBRUBRUBRUICOCOOCOIONNNNNN LLLIMIIIMIITEDTEDTEAANAD SD SUBSSUIDIDIIIAARRRIAARES S

CCCCCCCoooonnssssssoooolliidddaaatteeddd BBBBBaaaaallaaaannncceee SSShhhheeeeeett

AAAsAaaatt3030303SSSepepeptetettmbmbmbmmbbererer22220101077

RUBICON GROUP

Notes

Sep 2017

US$m

June 2016

US$m

Current assets

Cash and liquid deposits9312

Trade and other receivables10936

Inventory114171

Total current assets81109

Non current assets

Fixed assets136226

Forest assets–1

Investment in associate15–91

Intellectual property14107–

Goodwill161854

Deferred taxation asset12–8

Total non current assets187180

Total assets268289

Current liabilities

Trade, other payables and provisions17(23)(42)

Curent lease obligation23(1)–

Current debt18(18)(29)

Deferred settlement15(15)–

Total current liabilities(57)(71)

Term liabilities

Term debt18(33)(35)

Financial lease obligation23(12)(3)

Deferred taxation liability12(6)–

Total term liabilities(51)(38)

Total liabilities(108)(109)

Net Assets160180

Equity

Share capital19201188

Reserves20(51)(48)

Equity attributable to Rubicon shareholders150140

Equity attributable to minority shareholders211040

Total Group Equity160180

Net Asset Backing29US 31 cpsUS 34 cps

Stephen Kasnet Luke Moriarty Mark Taylor

Chairman Chief Executive Offi cer & Director Chief Financial Offi cer

24 November 2017

Each of the above signatories certifi es that these fi nancial statements comply with generally accepted accounting standards and

present a true and fair view of the fi nancial affairs of the Rubicon Group.

The accompanying notes form part of and are to be read in conjunction with these fi nancial statements.

12
RURUBBICOICOICON LN LLLNIMIMIMIIIMTTEDTEDANAANANAD SSUBSIDIIDIIDAARRRIREEESS SSSSS SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS

NNoteeesss ttoo tttttttttttttttthhhhheeeeeeeeeeeee CCCooooonnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnsssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssoooooooooooooooooooooooooooollllllllllllllllllllllllllliiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiidddddddddddddddddddddddddaaaaaaaaaaaaattttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttteeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeedddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddd FFiinnnaaaannnccciiiiiaalll SSSttaaaaatttteeemmmeennnnttts

FFoorrththhhhhhhhththhhhhhhhhhhhheeeeeeeeeeeeeperirirrododododooooooooeendndnndnnddddndndddddddddndddnedeeeeedeeeeeeeeee33300000000000000SeSptteememeeemememmmmmmbbebebbbebbebbebeeebebbbbbbbebbbeeeeeerrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr202020202222020200202222022222022222222217171717177777777

1 GENERAL INFORMATION

Rubicon Limited (Rubicon) is an international investor in forestry related industries. Rubicon, a limited liability company incorporated and

domiciled in New Zealand, is listed on the New Zealand stock exchange. As at 30 September 2017 Rubicon had investments in Tenon

Clearwood Limited Partnership (TCLP) (44.88% economic ownership, and 50.01% voting control (by virtue of voting agreements)),

ArborGen Inc (ArborGen) (95% economic interest (with 5% warrants outstanding relating to ArborGen’s acquisition of Cellfor),

and 100% voting interest and ownership of common stock), and Tenon Limited (59.78%, being the listed entity that TCLP formerly

operated under).

This reporting period Rubicon changed its balance date from 30 June to 30 September. Accordingly, the fi nancial statements presented

are for the 15 months from 1 July 2016 to 30 September 2017, with the comparative period being the 12 months ended 30 June

2016. In the comparative year (30 June 2016), the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows and the Consolidated Balance Sheet include

Tenon’s discontinued operations, which are not materially different from the disclosures in note 31 discontinued operations. Changes

have been made to the results for the year ended 30 June 2016 to refl ect Tenon’s US operations as discontinued.

2 APPROVAL OF ACCOUNTS

These fi nancial statements have been prepared on a consolidated basis and were approved for issue by the Board of Directors on 24

November 2017.

3 BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The fi nancial statements presented are those of Rubicon Limited (the Company) and Subsidiaries (the Group).

Basis of preparation

The Company is a FMC (Financial Markets Conduct) reporting entity for the purposes of the Financial Reporting Act 2013 and Financial

Markets Conduct Act 2013.

The accounting policies are consistent with those used in the June 2016 consolidated fi nancial statements. The signifi cant accounting

policies are set out below.

The presentation currency used in the preparation of these fi nancial statements is Rubicon’s functional currency, which is the United States

dollar (US$), rounded to the nearest million dollars.

Statement of compliance

The fi nancial statements have been prepared in accordance with New Zealand International Financial Reporting Standards (NZ IFRS) and

other applicable fi nancial reporting standards. The fi nancial statements are in compliance with International Financial Reporting Standards

(IFRS). The Group has designated itself as a profi t-oriented entity for the purposes of compliance with NZ IFRS.

The fi nancial statements have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Financial Reporting Act 2013, Financial Markets

Conduct Act 2013 and the Companies Act 1993 and comply with generally accepted accounting practice in New Zealand (NZ GAAP).

Chief operating decision-makers

Rubicon’s ‘chief operating decision-makers’ are Ranjan Tandon and David Knott, who are Rubicon Board Directors whose investment funds

and associated parties own approximately 46% of Rubicon’s issued share capital, and, who jointly make strategic decisions for Rubicon.

13
RURUBRUBRUBRUBRUICOCOOCOIONNNNNN LLLIMIIIMIITEDTEDTEAANAD SD SUBSSUIDIDIIIAARRRIAARES S

NNNNNNNooootteeeeessss ttoo ttthhee CCCooooonnnnsssooollliiidddddaaattteeeeddd FFiinnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaannnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnncccccccccccciiiiiiaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaalllllllll SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaatteemmmmmmmmmmeennnnnnnnnnnnnnnntttttttttss

FFoForrththhheeeepepepriririoododoeeeenddndndedededd33300SeSeeepptptpeemmbeeer 200201777111

4 SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Change in Accounting Policy

There have been no changes in accounting policies during the year.

New and amended standards adopted by the Group

There were no new standards or amendments to standards adopted by the Group in the current year that had a material impact on the

Group.

Use of Estimates and Judgement

The preparation of fi nancial statements in conformity with NZ IFRS requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect

the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the fi nancial statements and

the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The principal

areas of judgement in preparing these fi nancial statements are:

Deferred taxation (notes 12 and 15)

NZ IFRS allows the recognition of taxation assets when utilisation is considered probable, which requires an estimation of the future

earnings of the Group.

NZ IFRS requires the measurement of deferred taxation assets and liabilities that refl ect the tax consequences that would follow from the

manner that the Group expects, at balance date, to recover or settle the carrying amount of its assets and liabilities.

Acquisitions, goodwill and impairment (notes 15 and 16)

Upon acquisition of ArborGen, a determination of the fair value of identifi able assets (which does not include goodwill) and liabilities

was made. Any surplus or short-fall to the acquisition price paid is immediately recognised in the income statement. The carrying value of

goodwill is assessed at least annually to ensure there is no impairment. Performing these assessments generally requires the estimation of

future cash fl ows to be generated by the investment, which entails making judgements about the expected future performance and cash

fl ows of the investment and the appropriate discount rate to apply when valuing future cash fl ows. The carrying value of assets acquired

are also affected by the estimates and judgements applied to capitalisation of developmental expenditure and the adopted amortisation

policy.

Basis of Consolidation

Subsidiaries

Subsidiaries are entities that are controlled, either directly or indirectly, by the Company. Control exists when the Parent has the power,

directly or indirectly, to govern the fi nancial and operating policies of an entity so as to obtain benefi ts from its activities. In assessing

control, potential voting rights that presently are exercisable or convertible are taken into account. The fi nancial statements of subsidiaries

are included in the consolidated fi nancial statements from the date that control commences until the date that control ceases. ArborGen,

TCLP and Tenon Limited are subsidiaries of Rubicon Limited.

Transactions and balances between subsidiaries or between the Parent and subsidiaries are eliminated on consolidation.

Associates

Associates are entities in which the Company, either directly or indirectly, has a signifi cant but not controlling interest. The consolidated

fi nancial statements include the Group’s share of the total recognised gains and losses of associates on an equity accounted basis, from

the date that signifi cant infl uence commences until the date that signifi cant infl uence ceases. Associates are initially recognised at cost.

ArborGen was accounted for as an associate of Rubicon Limited up to the date of its 100% acquisition on 28 June 2017.

14
RURUBBICOICOICON LN LLLNIMIMIMIIIMTTEDTEDANAANANAD SSUBSIDIIDIIDAARRRIREEESS SSSSS SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS

NNoteeesss ttoo tttttttttttttttthhhhheeeeeeeeeeeee CCCooooonnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnsssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssoooooooooooooooooooooooooooollllllllllllllllllllllllllliiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiidddddddddddddddddddddddddaaaaaaaaaaaaattttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttteeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeedddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddd FFiinnnaaaannnccciiiiiaalll SSSttaaaaatttteeemmmeennnnttts

FFoorrththhhhhhhhththhhhhhhhhhhhheeeeeeeeeeeeeperirirrododododooooooooeendndnndnnddddndndddddddddndddnedeeeeedeeeeeeeeee33300000000000000SeSptteememeeemememmmmmmbbebebbbebbebbebeeebebbbbbbbebbbeeeeeerrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr202020202222020200202222022222022222222217171717177777777

4 SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES continued

Goodwill

All business combinations are accounted for by applying the purchase method. Goodwill represents the difference between the cost of the

acquisition and the Group’s share of the fair value of the identifi able net assets acquired. Goodwill is stated at cost less any accumulated

impairment losses. Goodwill is allocated to cash-generating units and is not amortised but is assessed at least annually for impairment.

Functional Currency

Foreign operations

Items included in the fi nancial statements of each entity in the Group are measured using the currency that best refl ects the economic

substance of the underlying events and circumstances relevant to that entity (the functional currency). The consolidated fi nancial statements

are presented in US$ (the presentation and functional currency).

The assets and liabilities of all of the Group companies that have a functional currency that differs from the presentation currency,

including goodwill and fair value adjustments arising on consolidation, are translated to the presentation currency at foreign exchange

rates ruling at balance date. All exchange differences arising from the translation of foreign operations are recognised in the foreign

currency translation reserve.

Transactions


Transactions in currencies other than the functional currency are translated at the foreign exchange rate ruling at the date of the

transaction. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the functional currency at balance date are translated

to the functional currency at the foreign exchange rate ruling at that date, with foreign exchange differences arising on translation being

recognised in the income statement. Non-monetary assets and liabilities that are measured in terms of historical cost in a currency other

than the functional currency are translated using the exchange rate at the date of the transaction. Non-monetary assets and liabilities that

are stated at fair value in a currency other than the functional currency are translated using the exchange rate ruling at the date the fair

value was determined.

Valuation of Assets

Land, buildings, plant and equipment


Land, buildings, plant and equipment are stated at historical cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment. Land is not depreciated.

Depreciation on other fi xed assets is calculated using the straight-line method. Expected useful lives are:

Buildings 30 years

Plant and equipment 3 to 13 years

Intangibles 20 to 25 years.

Inventory

Trading inventory, raw materials and work in progress are valued at the lower of cost or net realisable value. Cost includes direct manufacturing

costs and manufacturing overheads at normal operating levels, and excludes borrowing costs. Net realisable value is the estimated selling

price in the ordinary course of business, less applicable variable selling costs.

Biological assets (such as seedlings or treestocks) are measured at the end of each reporting period at their fair value less costs to sell.

Fair value is the price that would be received from the sale of an asset in an orderly transaction between market participants at the

measurement date.

15
RURUBRUBRUBRUBRUICOCOOCOIONNNNNN LLLIMIIIMIITEDTEDTEAANAD SD SUBSSUIDIDIIIAARRRIAARES S

NNNNNNNooootteeeeessss ttoo ttthhee CCCooooonnnnsssooollliiidddddaaattteeeeddd FFiinnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaannnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnncccccccccccciiiiiiaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaalllllllll SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaatteemmmmmmmmmmeennnnnnnnnnnnnnnntttttttttss

FFoForrththhheeeepepepriririoododoeeeenddndndedededd33300SeSeeepptptpeemmbeeer 200201777111

4 SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES continued

Intellectual property

Intellectual property is amortised over the useful life of the assets. Intellectual property relates to the output of ArborGen’s research and

development activities and is reviewed at least annually for impairment, and otherwise is amortised (on average) over 20 years. The useful

life is reviewed each balance date and adjusted if appropriate.

Trade and other receivables

Trade receivables are carried at cost, less provision for impairment. A provision for impairment of trade receivables is established when

there is objective evidence that the Group will not be able to collect all amounts due according to the original terms of receivables. The

amount of the provision is the difference between the asset’s carrying amount and the present value of estimated future cash fl ows,

discounted at the effective interest rate. The movement in the provision is recognised in the income statement.

Cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents comprise cash balances and call deposits. Bank overdrafts that are repayable on demand and form an integral

part of the Group’s cash management are included as a component of cash and cash equivalents for the purpose of the statement of

cash fl ows.

Assets held for sale and discontinued operations

Assets held for sale are assets whose carrying value will be recovered principally through sale rather than through continuing use. Assets

held for sale are stated at the lower of their carrying amount and fair value less costs to sell and are not depreciated or amortised while

they are classifi ed as held for sale.

A discontinued operation is a component of the Group’s business that represents a separate major line of business. Classifi cation as a

discontinued operation occurs upon disposal or when the operation meets the criteria to be classifi ed as held for sale, if earlier.

Impairment


The carrying amounts of the Group’s assets are reviewed regularly, including at each reporting date, to determine whether there is any

indication of impairment. If any such indication exists, the asset’s recoverable amount is estimated and whenever the carrying amount of

an asset or its cash-generating unit exceeds its recoverable amount, an impairment loss is recognised in the income statement.

Impairment losses recognised in respect of cash-generating units are allocated fi rst to reduce the carrying amount of any goodwill

allocated to cash-generating units, and then to reduce the carrying amount of other assets in the cash-generating unit on a pro-rata basis.

The recoverable amount of non-fi nancial assets is the greater of their fair value less costs to sell or value in use. In assessing value in use,

the estimated future cash fl ows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that refl ects current market assessments

of the time value of money and the risks specifi c to the asset. For an asset that does not generate largely independent cash fl ows, the

recoverable amount is determined for the cash-generating unit to which the asset belongs. With the exception of goodwill, an impairment

loss is reversed if there has been a change in the estimates used to determine the recoverable amount.

An impairment loss is reversed only to the extent that the asset’s carrying amount does not exceed the carrying amount that would have

been determined, net of depreciation or amortisation, if no impairment loss had been recognised.

Valuation of Liabilities

Trade and other payables

Trade and other payables are stated at cost.

16
RURUBBICOICOICON LN LLLNIMIMIMIIIMTTEDTEDANAANANAD SSUBSIDIIDIIDAARRRIREEESS SSSSS SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS

NNoteeesss ttoo tttttttttttttttthhhhheeeeeeeeeeeee CCCooooonnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnsssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssoooooooooooooooooooooooooooollllllllllllllllllllllllllliiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiidddddddddddddddddddddddddaaaaaaaaaaaaattttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttteeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeedddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddd FFiinnnaaaannnccciiiiiaalll SSSttaaaaatttteeemmmeennnnttts

FFoorrththhhhhhhhththhhhhhhhhhhhheeeeeeeeeeeeeperirirrododododooooooooeendndnndnnddddndndddddddddndddnedeeeeedeeeeeeeeee33300000000000000SeSptteememeeemememmmmmmbbebebbbebbebbebeeebebbbbbbbebbbeeeeeerrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr202020202222020200202222022222022222222217171717177777777

4 SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES continued

Provisions

A provision is recognised in the balance sheet when the Group has a present legal or constructive obligation as a result of a past event, and

it is probable that an outfl ow of economic benefi ts will be required to settle the obligation. Provisions are measured at the Group’s best

estimate of the expenditure required to settle the present obligation. Provisions are determined by discounting the expected future cash

fl ows at a rate that refl ects current market assessments of the time value of money and, where appropriate, the risks specifi c to the liability.

Interest-bearing borrowings

Interest-bearing borrowings are recognised initially at fair value less attributable transaction costs. Subsequent to initial recognition,

borrowings are stated at amortised cost with any difference between cost and redemption value being recognised in the income statement

over the period of the borrowings on an effective interest rate basis.

Deferred income tax

Deferred income tax is provided in full, using the balance sheet method, on temporary differences arising between the tax bases of assets

and liabilities and their carrying amounts in the consolidated fi nancial statements. Deferred income tax is not accounted for if it arises from

initial recognition of an asset or liability in a transaction, other than a business combination, that at the time of the transaction affects

neither accounting, nor taxable, profi t or loss. Deferred income tax is determined using tax rates (and laws) that have been enacted or

substantively enacted by the balance date and are expected to apply when the related deferred income tax asset is realised or the deferred

income tax liability is settled. The measurement of deferred taxation assets and liabilities refl ects the tax consequences that would follow

from the manner that the Group expects, at balance date, to recover or settle the carrying amount of its assets and liabilities. Deferred

income tax assets are recognised to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profi t will be available against which the temporary

differences can be utilised.

Derivative fi nancial instruments

The Group uses derivative fi nancial instruments for the purpose of managing its exposure to adverse fl uctuations in foreign currency

exchange rates and commodity prices. While these instruments are subject to fl uctuations in value, such fl uctuations are generally offset

by the change in value of the underlying exposures being hedged.

The Group policy specifi cally prohibits the holding or issuing of derivative fi nancial instruments for speculative purposes. Derivatives that

do not qualify for hedge accounting are classifi ed as fi nancial assets and are initially recognised at fair value at the date the contract is

entered into. The subsequent gains or losses arising from changes in the fair value of fi nancial assets are recognised immediately in the

income statement.

However, where derivatives qualify for hedge accounting, recognition of any resultant gain or loss depends on the nature of the item

being hedged.

Cash fl ow hedge

For cash fl ow hedge transactions in which the Group is hedging the variability of future cash fl ows related to a variable-rate asset, liability

or a forecasted transaction, the effective portion of the changes in the fair value of the derivative instrument are reported in the statement

of comprehensive income. The gains and losses on the derivative instrument that are reported in the statement of comprehensive income

are reclassifi ed to earnings in the periods in which earnings are impacted by the variability of the cash fl ows of the hedged item.

The ineffective portion of all hedges is recognised in current period earnings.

The net interest received or paid on the contracts is refl ected as interest income or expense of the related hedged position. Gains and losses

resulting from the termination of contracts are recognised over the original period hedged as long as the underlying cash fl ows are still

probable of occurring. If the hedged positions are sold, or the underlying cash fl ows are no longer probable of occurring, any unrealised

gains or losses are recognised in the current period.

17
RURUBRUBRUBRUBRUICOCOOCOIONNNNNN LLLIMIIIMIITEDTEDTEAANAD SD SUBSSUIDIDIIIAARRRIAARES S

NNNNNNNooootteeeeessss ttoo ttthhee CCCooooonnnnsssooollliiidddddaaattteeeeddd FFiinnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaannnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnncccccccccccciiiiiiaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaalllllllll SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaatteemmmmmmmmmmeennnnnnnnnnnnnnnntttttttttss

FFoForrththhheeeepepepriririoododoeeeenddndndedededd33300SeSeeepptptpeemmbeeer 200201777111

4 SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES continued

Fair value hedges

Changes in the fair value of derivatives, which are designated and qualify as fair value hedges, are recorded in the income statement,

together with any changes in the fair value of the hedged asset or liability that are attributable to the hedged risk.

Cash dividend to equity holders

The Group recognises a liability to make a cash distribution to equity holders when the distribution is authorised and the distribution is

no longer at the discretion of the company. As per the company law in New Zealand, a distribution is authorised when it is approved

by the directors. A corresponding amount is recognised directly in equity.

Income Determination

Revenue recognition

Revenue comprises the fair value of the consideration received for the sale of goods and services, net of any value added tax, returns,

rebates and discounts and after eliminating sales within the Group.

Goods sold

Revenue from the sale of goods is recognised in the income statement when the signifi cant risks and rewards of ownership have been

transferred to the buyer. Products are generally sold with volume discounts and customers have a right to return faulty product. Sales

are recorded based on the price negotiated with the customer, net of estimated volume discounts and returns. Historical experience

is used to estimate the level of returns likely and volume rebates are calculated on a preset formula.

Investment income

Interest income is recognised in the income statement as it accrues, using the effective interest method. Dividend income is recognised

in the income statement on the date the Group’s right to receive payment is established.

Finance expense

Finance expenses comprise interest payable on borrowings calculated using the effective interest rate method.

Leasing commitments

The Group leases certain plant, equipment, land and buildings. Leases in which a signifi cant portion of the risks and rewards of

ownership are retained by the lessor are classifi ed as operating leases. Operating lease payments are charged to the income statement

in the periods of expected benefi t.

Leases in which the Group assumes substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership are classifi ed as fi nance leases. Upon initial

recognition the leased asset is measured at an amount equal to the lower of its fair value and the present value of the minimum

lease payments. Subsequent to initial recognition, the asset, leased under a fi nance lease, is accounted for in accordance with the

accounting policy applicable to that asset.

Research and development costs

All research costs are recognised as an expense when incurred. When a project reaches the stage where it is reasonably certain that

further expenditure can be recovered through the processes or products produced, development expenditure is recognised as a

development asset. The asset is amortised from the commencement of commercial production of the product to which it relates, over

the period of expected benefi t.

18
RURUBBICOICOICON LN LLLNIMIMIMIIIMTTEDTEDANAANANAD SSUBSIDIIDIIDAARRRIREEESS SSSSS SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS

NNoteeesss ttoo tttttttttttttttthhhhheeeeeeeeeeeee CCCooooonnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnsssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssoooooooooooooooooooooooooooollllllllllllllllllllllllllliiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiidddddddddddddddddddddddddaaaaaaaaaaaaattttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttteeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeedddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddd FFiinnnaaaannnccciiiiiaalll SSSttaaaaatttteeemmmeennnnttts

FFoorrththhhhhhhhththhhhhhhhhhhhheeeeeeeeeeeeeperirirrododododooooooooeendndnndnnddddndndddddddddndddnedeeeeedeeeeeeeeee33300000000000000SeSptteememeeemememmmmmmbbebebbbebbebbebeeebebbbbbbbebbbeeeeeerrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr202020202222020200202222022222022222222217171717177777777

4 SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES continued

Income tax

Income tax on the profi t or loss for the year comprises current and deferred tax. Income tax is recognised in the income statement except

to the extent that it relates to items recognised directly in equity, in which case it is recognised in equity.

Current tax is the expected tax payable on the taxable income for the year, using tax rates enacted or substantially enacted at balance

date, and any adjustment to tax payable in respect of previous years.

Employee Benefi ts

Other employee benefi ts

Long service leave vests to certain employees after varying periods of service. The Group’s net obligation in respect of long service leave is

the amount of future benefi t that employees have earned in return for their service in the current and prior periods.

Share-based payments

The grant-date fair value of equity-settled share-based payment arrangements granted to employees is generally recognised as an expense,

with a corresponding increase in equity, over the vesting period of the awards.

Segmental Reporting

Operating segments are reported in a manner consistent with the internal reporting provided to the chief operating decision-makers. The

Group has two reportable segments, which are the Group’s strategic business assets; being Tenon Clearwood (appearance and wood

products) and ArborGen (forestry genetics), which offer different products and services. The Group’s geographical segments are based on

both the location of customers and primary location of assets (refer to note 25 segmental information summary).

Goods and Services Tax

The income statement and statement of cash fl ow have been prepared exclusive of goods and services taxation.

Comparatives

Changes in prior year disclosure comparatives have been made to align with the current year presentation. Changes have been made to

the results for the year ended 30 June 2016 to refl ect Tenon’s US operations as discontinued.

Future NZ IFRS Pronouncements

Standards or interpretations issued but not yet effective and relevant to the Group.

The International Accounting Standards Board has issued a number of standards, amendments and interpretations which are not yet

effective and which may have an impact on the Group’s fi nancial statements. These are detailed below. The Group has not applied these

in preparing these fi nancial statements and will apply each standard in the period in which it becomes mandatory:

a) NZ IFRS 9 – Financial Instruments – Classifi cation and Measurement - This standard addresses the classifi cation, measurement and de-

recognition of fi nancial assets, fi nancial liabilities, impairment of fi nancial assets and hedge accounting, and will be effective for the

year ended 30 September 2019.

b) NZ IFRS 15 – Revenue from Contracts with Customers - This standard establishes the framework for revenue recognition, and will be

effective for the year ended 30 September 2019.

c) NZ IFRS 16 – Leases - This standard requires a lessee to recognise a lease liability refl ecting the future lease payments and a ‘right-of-use

asset’ for substantively all lease contracts, and will be effective for the year ended 30 September 2020.

The Group has not fully assessed the impact of these new standards or amendments.

19
RURUBRUBRUBRUBRUICOCOOCOIONNNNNN LLLIMIIIMIITEDTEDTEAANAD SD SUBSSUIDIDIIIAARRRIAARES S

NNNNNNNooootteeeeessss ttoo ttthhee CCCooooonnnnsssooollliiidddddaaattteeeeddd FFiinnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaannnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnncccccccccccciiiiiiaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaalllllllll SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaatteemmmmmmmmmmeennnnnnnnnnnnnnnntttttttttss

FFoForrththhheeeepepepriririoododoeeeenddndndedededd33300SeSeeepptptpeemmbeeer 200201777111

5 FINANCIAL RISKS

The Group’s principal assets are the investments in Tenon Clearwood and ArborGen.

This note presents information about the Group’s potential exposure to fi nancial risks that the Group has identifi ed; the Group’s

objectives, policies and processes for managing those risks; the estimation of fair values of fi nancial instruments; and the Group’s

management of capital. Quantitative disclosures of some of the key fi nancial risks are made below.

5.1 ArborGen

ArborGen has exposure to fi nancial risks which are actively assessed and managed.

5.1(a) Foreign exchange risk

ArborGen is a US functional currency business, which operates in three geographies – the United States, Brazil and Australasia.

Australasian operations are self suffi cient from a funding perspective, and generally there are no cash fl ows between Australasia

and the US. Accordingly, the foreign exchange risk in Australasia is limited to the translation effect on its earnings and balance sheet

from movements in the USD against the NZD and AUD. The Brazil operations are to a large degree internally self-suffi cient from a

funding perspective, and in addition there has been a link between the Reais and the USD, which limits the effect of relative currency

movements to their translation impacts. There are no transactions in the US operations in a currency other than the USD.

5.1(b) Credit risk

ArborGen is at risk of customer default on payment for treestocks at the conclusion of a growing season. ArborGen mitigates this

risk by dealing with a wide-range of customers in multiple markets, by securing up-front deposits from selected customers for the

treestocks it grows each year, and by retaining title to product until fi nal customer payments have been made. The nature of ArborGen’s

activity is that its customers tend to require yearly repeat business, and historically customer payment defaults have not been material to

ArborGen’s business. However, in the US market (ArborGen’s largest market), as treestock orders are not considered to be unconditional

until late in the season each year, there remains the risk that orders cancelled prior to collection may not be able to be sold to other

customers during the remaining season.

5.1(c) Liquidity risk

ArborGen has banking facilities (in total $28 million (2016: $28 million)) with two banks in the United States. One of these facilities,

a $12.6 million reducing loan, matures in May 2036 and the other, a $15 million revolver, expires in August 2018. These facilities are

used to fund ArborGen’s working capital and capital expenditure needs in its US activities. ArborGen also has a NZ$4.25 million NZ-

based bank facility, which has an expiry date of 1 November 2018, which is used to fund its Australasian operations. If any of these

facilities were not to be renewed then ArborGen would need to obtain similar facilities from other banks, or an equivalent amount of

funding would need to be supplied by Rubicon, or through an ArborGen capital raising event. None of these ArborGen bank facilities

have recourse to Rubicon Limited.

During the reporting period ArborGen was not self-funding, although the commercial operations were cash positive. However,

ArborGen is forecast to be net cash positive moving forward, although it may continue to require intra-season working capital funding

(repayable at the end of the US selling season) from Rubicon.

5.1(d) Interest rate risk

ArborGen’s $12.6 million facility is at a fi xed interest rate. Its US revolver facility is LIBOR + a margin, and is currently fully fl oating. The

mix of fi xed and fl oating in these two facilities balances ArborGen’s relative US interest rate risk. This position is regularly reassessed

based on underlying macro-economic conditions and ArborGen’s cash fl ow projections.

20
RURUBBICOICOICON LN LLLNIMIMIMIIIMTTEDTEDANAANANAD SSUBSIDIIDIIDAARRRIREEESS SSSSS SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS

NNoteeesss ttoo tttttttttttttttthhhhheeeeeeeeeeeee CCCooooonnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnsssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssoooooooooooooooooooooooooooollllllllllllllllllllllllllliiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiidddddddddddddddddddddddddaaaaaaaaaaaaattttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttteeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeedddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddd FFiinnnaaaannnccciiiiiaalll SSSttaaaaatttteeemmmeennnnttts

FFoorrththhhhhhhhththhhhhhhhhhhhheeeeeeeeeeeeeperirirrododododooooooooeendndnndnnddddndndddddddddndddnedeeeeedeeeeeeeeee33300000000000000SeSptteememeeemememmmmmmbbebebbbebbebbebeeebebbbbbbbebbbeeeeeerrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr202020202222020200202222022222022222222217171717177777777

5 FINANCIAL RISKS continued

5.2 Tenon Clearwood

5.2(a) Key fi nancial risks and approach to risk management

Rubicon’s control of the Tenon Clearwood operations has continued over the reporting period, fi rst under the ownership of Tenon until 28

April 2017, then under the ownership of TCLP. The following discussion canvasses the risks in relation to TCLP’s ownership of the Tenon

Clearwood operations.

TCLP’s principal fi nancial instruments comprise receivables, payables, bank loans and overdrafts, cash and short-term deposits and

derivatives.

TCLP manages its exposure to the key fi nancial risks, foreign exchange risk, credit risk and liquidity risk, in accordance with approved

policies and in order to meet the terms of its bank credit facilities. TCLP enters into derivative transactions (principally forward currency

contracts) to manage currency risks. All such transactions are carried out within the approved guidelines. TCLP does not use derivative

fi nancial instruments for speculative purposes.

5.2(a) (i) Key TCLP FX sensitivities

Impact of movement in key sensitivities on -Profi t before

taxation

US$m

1 cent movement in:

NZ$:US$0.73

NZ$:EUR0.23

US$ against Tenon’s weighted basket of currencies0.53

Log Price - NZ$1/tonne (annual 300,000 tonnes) 0.21

The sensitivities calculated above are based upon the TCLP fi scal 2018 operating budget updated for current market conditions. It is

estimated that the US$ sensitivity against TCLP’s weighted basket of currencies would be $0.53 million under a full year of operation.

However, NZ$ log prices have historically tended to move with changes in the US$. If this was assumed in the US$ sensitivity against

Tenon’s weighted basket of currencies, the 1 cent sensitivity would reduce from $0.53 million to $nil. In calculating the sensitivities it is

assumed that key pricing variables remain constant.

5.2(a) (ii) Foreign exchange risk

TCLP operates internationally and is exposed to foreign exchange risk arising from various currency exposures, primarily with respect to

the NZ$. TCLP’s functional currency is the US$. TCLP uses forward contracts to manage its foreign exchange risk arising from its day-

to-day commercial transactions. Foreign exchange risk arises when its commercial transactions and recognised assets and liabilities are

denominated in a currency other than the functional currency.

TCLP’s policy is to manage currency exchange rate exposure to limit the impact that any adverse changes in foreign exchange rates might

have on TCLP’s fi nancial position, profi tability and cash fl ow. Non-monetary assets are recorded in their functional currency, as determined

by the dominant currency of cash fl ows, sales prices, sales markets, expenses and debt structure. The currency denomination and quantum

of debt outstanding are managed so that economic risk exposure to currency movements on the aggregate of balance sheet and revenue

items is within policy limits.

5.2(a) (iii) Interest rate risk

TCLP’s has a LIBOR-based debt facility, and interest periods can be for a term of one, two, three or six months (or such other period or

periods as the lender and the borrower may agree). Borrowings issued at these short-term variable rates expose TCLP to market interest

rate risk. TCLP’s policy is to manage its interest position depending upon underlying interest rate exposures and economic conditions, and

also to meet the terms of the facility agreements.

21
RURUBRUBRUBRUBRUICOCOOCOIONNNNNN LLLIMIIIMIITEDTEDTEAANAD SD SUBSSUIDIDIIIAARRRIAARES S

NNNNNNNooootteeeeessss ttoo ttthhee CCCooooonnnnsssooollliiidddddaaattteeeeddd FFiinnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaannnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnncccccccccccciiiiiiaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaalllllllll SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaatteemmmmmmmmmmeennnnnnnnnnnnnnnntttttttttss

FFoForrththhheeeepepepriririoododoeeeenddndndedededd33300SeSeeepptptpeemmbeeer 200201777111

5 FINANCIAL RISKS continued

5.2(b) Credit risk

Credit risk is the risk of fi nancial loss to TCLP if a customer or counterparty to a fi nancial instrument fails to meet its contractual obligations,

and arises principally from receivables from customers and fi nancial derivatives it has entered into.

5.2(b) (i) Trade and other receivables

TCLP’s exposure to credit risk is infl uenced by the individual characteristics of each customer or counterparty. Credit arrangements are

entered into in accordance with credit rating limits and dollar limits. It is TCLP’s policy that all customers who wish to trade on credit

terms are subject to credit verifi cation procedures including an assessment of their independent credit rating, fi nancial position, past

experience and industry reputation. In the US, TCLP has entered into credit insurance arrangements for approximately 32% of trade

receivables (2016: 27%), thereby reducing the credit risk exposure. The total amount of policy cover is approximately $1.75 million and is

subject to certain blanket deductibles for individual customers. TCLP maintains a provision for doubtful debts based upon an estimate of

losses expected in respect of trade and other receivables (refer to note 27 (b) (i) exposure to credit risk, for analysis of accounts). TCLP has

balanced exposure in the US, operating in both the retail (home centre DIY) and pro-dealer (new home construction builder) segments

of the market, and in addition it sells to large customers in the European wood modifi cation market. In this way it operates a balanced

geographic, market segment, and customer strategy, thereby mitigating risk by diversifying the origin of its net cash fl ows. TCLP has three

customers who each represent between 10-15% of TCLP’s total annual revenues.

5.2(b) (ii) Financial derivatives

TCLP is exposed to counterparty risk in respect of potential default of a counterparty to a fi nancial instrument, with the maximum

exposure equal to the carrying amount of those instruments. Financial instruments are only undertaken with TCLP’s primary lending

institution to minimise the risk of default of counterparties.

5.2(c) Liquidity risk

Liquidity risk is the risk that TCLP will be unable to meet its fi nancial commitments as they fall due. TCLP’s treasury policy aims to maintain

fl exibility in funding by keeping committed credit lines available.

TCLP has bank facilities with the Bank of New Zealand (the specifi cs of which are discussed in detail in note 18 term and current debt),

which does not have any recourse to Rubicon Limited.

TCLP was in compliance with the fi nancial covenants included in its facilities throughout the 2017 fi scal period.

5.2(d) Capital management

TCLP’s objectives when managing capital are to maximise the return for the TCLP investors and safeguard TCLP’s ability to continue as a

going concern. In order to maintain or adjust the capital structure TCLP may buy back its shares, make shareholder distributions, issue new

shares or sell assets, subject to the terms of TCLP’s debt facility and partnership agreement.

5.2(e) Fair value estimation

Financial instruments are recorded in the balance sheet at an estimated fair value. In the 2017 and 2016 periods, foreign exchange

contracts are treated as effective hedges under NZ IAS 39 (refer note 4 signifi cant accounting policies, valuation of liabilities). The fair

value of fi nancial instruments traded in active markets is based on quoted market prices at balance date. The quoted market price used for

fi nancial assets held by TCLP is the exit price. The fair value of fi nancial instruments that are not traded in an active market is determined

by using valuation techniques. Externally sourced valuations are used to value foreign exchange contracts held at balance date.

In line with IFRS 13, the credit quality of counterparties was considered as part of the fair value measurement. The carrying value less

impairment provision of trade receivables and payables are assumed to approximate their fair values. The carrying amount of cash

and liquid deposits and bank overdrafts is equivalent to the fair value. Long-term fi nancial liabilities and other receivables are held at

amortised cost.

22
RURUBBICOICOICON LN LLLNIMIMIMIIIMTTEDTEDANAANANAD SSUBSIDIIDIIDAARRRIREEESS SSSSS SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS

NNoteeesss ttoo tttttttttttttttthhhhheeeeeeeeeeeee CCCooooonnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnsssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssoooooooooooooooooooooooooooollllllllllllllllllllllllllliiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiidddddddddddddddddddddddddaaaaaaaaaaaaattttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttteeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeedddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddd FFiinnnaaaannnccciiiiiaalll SSSttaaaaatttteeemmmeennnnttts

FFoorrththhhhhhhhththhhhhhhhhhhhheeeeeeeeeeeeeperirirrododododooooooooeendndnndnnddddndndddddddddndddnedeeeeedeeeeeeeeee33300000000000000SeSptteememeeemememmmmmmbbebebbbebbebbebeeebebbbbbbbebbbeeeeeerrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr202020202222020200202222022222022222222217171717177777777

5 FINANCIAL RISKS continued

5.3 Rubicon Limited

Rubicon’s capital includes share capital, reserves, retained earnings and minority interest, and Rubicon manages capital in such a manner

as to maintain stakeholder confi dence and safeguard Rubicon’s ability to continue as a going concern, whilst also maximising the return

for shareholders and sustaining resources for the future development of the business. In order to maintain or adjust the capital structure

Rubicon may pay dividends or return capital, or issue new shares or sell assets.

Liquidity risk management requires the maintenance of available cash combined with the availability of funding to meet the Company’s

needs as they develop. Rubicon prepares forecasts of its cash requirements and ensures it has fi nancial resources in place to meet its day-

to-day operating and investment needs.

In addition to the fi nancial risks applicable to its two principal investments (outlined above) Rubicon is exposed to fi nancial risk with respect

to its cash, short-term deposits and sub-debt loans. At balance date Rubicon Limited had borrowings of $6 million and $12.6 million

in cash (2016: debt $26 million, cash nil), and believes these resources, together with forecast proceeds from TCLP and funds yet to be

received from the liquidation of Tenon Limited, will be suffi cient to meet its funding needs through to 30 September 2018.

6 REPORTING CURRENCY

Rubicon reports in United States dollars (US$), consequently all fi nancial numbers are in US$ unless otherwise stated.

7 OPERATING EXPENSES INCLUDE

RUBICON GROUP

15 months

Sep 2017

US$m

Year ended

June 2016

US$m

Depreciation and amortisations included in:

Cost of sales expense (2) (1)

Administration:

Intellectual property (refer note 14) (1)–

Distribution expense (1)–

Total depreciation and amortisations (4) (1)

Cost of inventory expensed in cost of sales (90) (71)

Employee related expenses (21) (14)

Expenses incurred also includes payments made and accrued for:

- Directors fees for non-executive Directors of Rubicon for the current period of $0.5 million (paid in NZ$0.6 million), (2016: $0.4 million

(paid in NZ$0.5 million)).

- The statutory audit of the annual fi nancial statements and review of the interim fi nancial statements in the current period; for Rubicon

$0.1 million (2016: $0.1 million), for Tenon $0.5 million (2016: $0.5 million), TCLP $0.1 million (2016: nil) and ArborGen (PWC) $0.2

million (2016: nil).

23
RURUBRUBRUBRUBRUICOCOOCOIONNNNNN LLLIMIIIMIITEDTEDTEAANAD SD SUBSSUIDIDIIIAARRRIAARES S

NNNNNNNooootteeeeessss ttoo ttthhee CCCooooonnnnsssooollliiidddddaaattteeeeddd FFiinnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaannnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnncccccccccccciiiiiiaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaalllllllll SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaatteemmmmmmmmmmeennnnnnnnnnnnnnnntttttttttss

FFoForrththhheeeepepepriririoododoeeeenddndndedededd33300SeSeeepptptpeemmbeeer 200201777111

7 OPERATING EXPENSES INCLUDE continued

- Taxation services provided by KPMG for Rubicon in the current period of less than $0.1 million (2016: $0.1 million).

- Other services provided by the auditors for Rubicon in the current period were less than $0.1 million (2016: less than $0.1 million),

which include attendance at the annual meetings and agreed upon procedures.

- Until June 2017, Tenon’s NZ corporate offi ce subleased offi ce space from Rubicon. In addition the directors fees associated with the

Rubicon CEO serving as chairman of Tenon were paid to Rubicon for Rubicon’s account. Recovery of offi ce and administrative costs

and directors fees from Tenon were $0.2 million (2016: $0.2 million).

- Refer to Reporting and Disclosure and Auditors in the Corporate Governance section in this Annual Report for commentary on the

Audit Committee process in managing the relationship with the Auditor and confi rming their independence.


8 INCOME TAX EXPENSE

RUBICON GROUP

15 months

Sep 2017

US$m

Year ended

June 2016

US$m

Earnings before taxation 7 3

Taxation at 28% (2) (1)

Adjusted for:

Permanent differences1 –

Tax losses recognised/(written off) 1 1

Taxation (expense)/benefi t ––

9 CASH AND LIQUID DEPOSITS

Cash and liquid deposits comprises cash held by: Rubicon $19 million (inclusive of $6 million cash on deposit with Synovus to secure

the ArborGen debt facility) (2016: nil), Tenon $5 million (2016: $2 million), TCLP $4 million and ArborGen $3 million.

10 TRADE AND OTHER RECEIVABLES

RUBICON GROUP

Sep 2017

US$m

June 2016

US$m

Trade debtors 7 31

Prepayments 1 3

Other receivables 1 2

Trade and other receivables 9 36

24
RURUBBICOICOICON LN LLLNIMIMIMIIIMTTEDTEDANAANANAD SSUBSIDIIDIIDAARRRIREEESS SSSSS SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS

NNoteeesss ttoo tttttttttttttttthhhhheeeeeeeeeeeee CCCooooonnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnsssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssoooooooooooooooooooooooooooollllllllllllllllllllllllllliiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiidddddddddddddddddddddddddaaaaaaaaaaaaattttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttteeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeedddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddd FFiinnnaaaannnccciiiiiaalll SSSttaaaaatttteeemmmeennnnttts

FFoorrththhhhhhhhththhhhhhhhhhhhheeeeeeeeeeeeeperirirrododododooooooooeendndnndnnddddndndddddddddndddnedeeeeedeeeeeeeeee33300000000000000SeSptteememeeemememmmmmmbbebebbbebbebbebeeebebbbbbbbebbbeeeeeerrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr202020202222020200202222022222022222222217171717177777777

11 INVENTORY

RUBICON GROUP

Sep 2017

US$m

June 2016

US$m

Finished goods 11 64

Raw materials

(1)

111

Work in progress

(2)

156

Fair value adjustment on biological assets

(3)

4 –

Inventory 41 71

(1) Raw materials includes logs, seed and other items.

(2) Work in progress is principally growing seedling crop.

(3) Fair value adjustment on biological assets refl ects the change in fair value less costs to sell of biological assets (seedlings) as at

balance date.

12 TAXATION

Deferred taxation asset

Deferred income taxation assets and liabilities are offset when there is a legally enforceable right to do so and when the deferred income

taxes relate to the same fi scal authority.

RUBICON GROUP

Sep 2017

US$m

June 2016

US$m

The gross movement on the deferred taxation asset is as follows:

Opening provision for deferred taxation 8 11

Deferred taxation movement in period– (3)

Transfer to discontinued operations

(1)

(8) –

Deferred taxation asset – 8

Deferred taxation asset

Deferred taxation on assets – 7

Deferred taxation on liabilities – 1

Deferred taxation asset – 8

25
RURUBRUBRUBRUBRUICOCOOCOIONNNNNN LLLIMIIIMIITEDTEDTEAANAD SD SUBSSUIDIDIIIAARRRIAARES S

NNNNNNNooootteeeeessss ttoo ttthhee CCCooooonnnnsssooollliiidddddaaattteeeeddd FFiinnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaannnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnncccccccccccciiiiiiaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaalllllllll SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaatteemmmmmmmmmmeennnnnnnnnnnnnnnntttttttttss

FFoForrththhheeeepepepriririoododoeeeenddndndedededd33300SeSeeepptptpeemmbeeer 200201777111

12 TAXATION continued

Deferred taxation asset

RUBICON GROUP

Depreciation

US$m

Provisions

US$m

Tax losses

US$m

Current assets

US$m

Total

US$m

30 June 2016

Opening provision for deferred taxation (4) 2 14 (1) 11

Movement in deferred taxation –(1)(2)–(3)

Deferred taxation asset as at 30 June 2016

(4) 1 12 (1) 8

30 September 2017

Opening provision for deferred taxation (4) 1 12 (1) 8

Transfer to discontinued operations

(1)

4 (1) (12)1 (8)

Deferred taxation asset as at 30 September 2017

– – –– –

(1) As a result of Tenon’s disposition of all of its operations it derecognised all deferred taxation assets in the period.

NZ IFRS only allows the recognition of taxation assets when utilisation is considered probable, which is subject to the future earnings

of the Group and on meeting shareholder continuity and loss carry forward expiry dates. The Group had taxation losses (gross) at 30

September 2017 of $96 million, predominately in the United States, of which $29 million relates to ArborGen. Following the Rubicon

acquisition of ArborGen, tax loss utilisation in ArborGen is limited to $1.4 million per annum (gross).

Rubicon has imputation credits available to Rubicon shareholders of $3 million (2016: $3 million).

Deferred taxation (liability)

RUBICON GROUP

Sept 2017

US$m

June 2016

US$m

Opening provision for deferred taxation––

Deferred taxation on acquisition of ArborGen (6) –

Deferred taxation (liability)(6)–

Deferred taxation relates to timing differences on intellectual property and product development.

26
RURUBBICOICOICON LN LLLNIMIMIMIIIMTTEDTEDANAANANAD SSUBSIDIIDIIDAARRRIREEESS SSSSS SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS

NNoteeesss ttoo tttttttttttttttthhhhheeeeeeeeeeeee CCCooooonnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnsssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssoooooooooooooooooooooooooooollllllllllllllllllllllllllliiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiidddddddddddddddddddddddddaaaaaaaaaaaaattttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttteeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeedddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddd FFiinnnaaaannnccciiiiiaalll SSSttaaaaatttteeemmmeennnnttts

FFoorrththhhhhhhhththhhhhhhhhhhhheeeeeeeeeeeeeperirirrododododooooooooeendndnndnnddddndndddddddddndddnedeeeeedeeeeeeeeee33300000000000000SeSptteememeeemememmmmmmbbebebbbebbebbebeeebebbbbbbbebbbeeeeeerrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr202020202222020200202222022222022222222217171717177777777

13 FIXED ASSETS

RUBICON GROUP

Sep 2017

US$m

June 2016

US$m

Cost

Land 20 6

Buildings 20 16

Building - fi nance lease 13 –

Plant and equipment36 47

Total cost 89 69

Accumulated depreciation

Buildings (6) (7)

Building - fi nance lease––

Plant and equipment (21) (36)

Total accumulated depreciation (27) (43)

Net book value

Land 20 6

Buildings 14 9

Building - fi nance lease 13 –

Plant and equipment15 11

Fixed assets net book value 62 26

Domicile of fi xed assets

Australasia 28 17

United States 34 9

Fixed assets net book value 62 26

27
RURUBRUBRUBRUBRUICOCOOCOIONNNNNN LLLIMIIIMIITEDTEDTEAANAD SD SUBSSUIDIDIIIAARRRIAARES S

NNNNNNNooootteeeeessss ttoo ttthhee CCCooooonnnnsssooollliiidddddaaattteeeeddd FFiinnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaannnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnncccccccccccciiiiiiaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaalllllllll SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaatteemmmmmmmmmmeennnnnnnnnnnnnnnntttttttttss

FFoForrththhheeeepepepriririoododoeeeenddndndedededd33300SeSeeepptptpeemmbeeer 200201777111

13 FIXED ASSETS continued

RUBICON GROUP

Fixed assets net book value

Land

US$m

Buildings

US$m

Building -

fi nance lease

US$m

Plant and

equipment

US$m

Capital work

in progress

US$m

Total

US$m

30 June 2016

Opening net book value 6 8 – 55 24

Additions–2 – 8 (5) 5

Depreciation charge– (1) –(2)– (3)

Fixed assets net book value as at 30 June 2016 6 9 – 11 – 26

30 September 2017

Opening net book value 6 9 – 11 – 26

Additions– – – 4 – 4

ArborGen assets accquired1610136 –45

Disposition of Tenon North American operations(2)(4)–(4) –(10)

Depreciation charge– (1)–(2)– (3)

Fixed assets net book value as at 30 Sep 2017

20 14 13 15– 62

14 INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

RUBICON GROUP

Sep 2017

US$m

June 2016

US$m

Opening Balance – –

Acquired on acquisition of ArborGen 107 –

Capitalisation during period 1 –

Amortisation during period (1) –

Intellectual property 107 –

28
RURUBBICOICOICON LN LLLNIMIMIMIIIMTTEDTEDANAANANAD SSUBSIDIIDIIDAARRRIREEESS SSSSS SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS

NNoteeesss ttoo tttttttttttttttthhhhheeeeeeeeeeeee CCCooooonnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnsssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssoooooooooooooooooooooooooooollllllllllllllllllllllllllliiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiidddddddddddddddddddddddddaaaaaaaaaaaaattttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttteeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeedddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddd FFiinnnaaaannnccciiiiiaalll SSSttaaaaatttteeemmmeennnnttts

FFoorrththhhhhhhhththhhhhhhhhhhhheeeeeeeeeeeeeperirirrododododooooooooeendndnndnnddddndndddddddddndddnedeeeeedeeeeeeeeee33300000000000000SeSptteememeeemememmmmmmbbebebbbebbebbebeeebebbbbbbbebbbeeeeeerrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr202020202222020200202222022222022222222217171717177777777

15 INVESTMENT IN ARBORGEN

On 28 June 2017 Rubicon acquired the 66.66% of ArborGen shares held by its then partners International Paper and WestRock, and

as a result increased Rubicon’s 33.34% ownership interest to 100% of ArborGen’s issued share capital. The total purchase price for the

partners’ combined shareholding was $28.5 million, with Rubicon paying each partner $6.767 million (total $13.53 million) on 28 June

2017, and agreeing to pay each another $2.5 million on 31 December 2017 (total $5 million) and a fi nal $5 million each on 30 June

2018 (total $10 million). As part of the acquisition, Rubicon agreed with the partners that should it, prior to 30 June 2018, sell-down its

ArborGen position to a third party such that upon completion it holds less than 50% of the business (i.e. shares or assets), for a value

above that implied by the Rubicon acquisition purchase price, then Rubicon would make a cash payment to each partner equivalent to

their share of the sale gain. Separately, there are warrants outstanding equal to 5% of the issued ArborGen share capital, which reduces

Rubicon’s effective economic exposure to ArborGen to 95%. These warrants arose out of ArborGen’s purchase of Cellfor in 2012, and

represent part-consideration for that acquisition. The warrants are automatically exercised upon an IPO of ArborGen, or alternatively at

any time if 66.67% of the warrant holders so elect. The warrants can also be exercised by ArborGen, upon either a sale of substantially

all of the ArborGen business or of a sale of 50.01% or more of ArborGen’s share capital. In addition, the ArborGen senior management

team hold options in respect of 5.3% of ArborGen’s issued share capital. These options are fully vested and can be exercised (subject to

service conditions) at the price per share paid by Rubicon when it acquired 100% of ArborGen, by the holders upon an IPO of ArborGen,

a sale of substantially all of the assets of ArborGen, or upon a sale or restructuring event (including the issuance of new share capital to a

third party) where following such event Rubicon holds less than a 50.01% ownership position.

RUBICON GROUP

June 2017

US$m

June 2016

US$m

Carrying value of associate

(1)

Balance at the beginning of the period 91 87

Capital contributions during period – 4

Earnings of associate 1 1

Effect of exchange rate changes – (1)

Total investment in associate (as at 28 June 2017) 92 91

Earnings relating to associate

(2)

Revenue 49 37

Profi t from associate 4 3

Group's share of earnings relating to associate (to 28 June 2017) 1 1

(1) ArborGen has a 31 March balance date. ArborGen has been accounted for as an associate of Rubicon through to 28 June 2017.

Because of the different timing of the lifting seasons in the US and NZ, the results for the period refl ect a full year revenue in the US,

approximately 15 months revenue in NZ, and 15 months of expenses in both jurisdictions.

(2) 100% of ArborGen’s operations.

29
RURUBRUBRUBRUBRUICOCOOCOIONNNNNN LLLIMIIIMIITEDTEDTEAANAD SD SUBSSUIDIDIIIAARRRIAARES S

NNNNNNNooootteeeeessss ttoo ttthhee CCCooooonnnnsssooollliiidddddaaattteeeeddd FFiinnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaannnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnncccccccccccciiiiiiaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaalllllllll SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaatteemmmmmmmmmmeennnnnnnnnnnnnnnntttttttttss

FFoForrththhheeeepepepriririoododoeeeenddndndedededd33300SeSeeepptptpeemmbeeer 200201777111

15 INVESTMENT IN ARBORGEN continued

RUBICON GROUP

Recognised assets and liabilities acquired of ArborGen

June 2017

US$m

Cash 2

Trade receivables and other3

Inventory23

Fixed assets45

Intellectual property and product development107

Total assets180

Current liabilities(13)

Current debt(11)

Deferred taxation liability(6)

Term liabilities(26)

Total liabilities(56)

Fair value of identifi able net assets124

Pre-existing investment in ArborGen(92)

32

Rubicon acquisition price29

Net fair value adjustment on associate investment and bargain purchase gain arising on acquistion3

Less currency translation reverse reclassifi ed to earnings (1)

Net fair value gain

(3)

2

(3) Under NZ IFRS, the acquisition of 100% of ArborGen required the re-measurement of Rubicon’s existing 33.34% investment. This

exercise was completed on 24 November 2017 and resulted in the recording of a net fair value loss of $48 million to the previous

associate investment carrying value, because NZ IFRS requires us to treat the equity investment as having been disposed of. All the

cumulative foreign exchange differences (accumulated in currency translation reserve) have been reclassifi ed from equity to earnings,

resulting in an expense of $1 million. Separately, NZ IFRS also required the determination of the fair value of ArborGen identifi able

assets and liabilities upon Rubicon’s 100% acquisition on 28 June 2017, compared to Rubicon’s purchase price paid, and this exercise

was completed on 24 November 2017. A fair value of $124 million (100%) was derived, which resulted in a bargain purchase gain

on acquisition of $51 million.

The reason the purchase price, in this instance, does not refl ect the fair value of the ArborGen business acquired is because an

orderly sales process was not run for the business. This was due to the unique nature of the then governing ArborGen shareholders’

agreement, which included strong pre-emptive rights over existing partners’ interests in the event of a sale, and also minority veto

rights in favour of the remaining partner. This meant that a 50.01% ownership interest would not have bought effective control of

the business. Given Rubicon was not prepared to forgo these protective provisions, this in turn meant that the exiting partners were

effectively unable to run a sales process for their respective shareholdings. Accordingly, we believe the business was acquired at a

‘bargain purchase price’ as defi ned by NZ IFRS, requiring a separate fair value determination of the identifi able assets and liabilities

acquired to be made. In determining the fair value of the ArborGen business acquired, we referenced and utilised the work of a third

party independent valuation report. That report was prepared for the ArborGen Board of Directors in May 2017, in support of the

valuation of options issued to ArborGen management in June 2017. The report used a discounted cash fl ow (DCF) model projection,

over a 10-year period inclusive of a terminal value. Only existing core ArborGen markets were valued (i.e. Australia, New Zealand,

United States and Brazil), with growth market opportunities (outside of the core) excluded from the analysis. Separate demand

30
RURUBBICOICOICON LN LLLNIMIMIMIIIMTTEDTEDANAANANAD SSUBSIDIIDIIDAARRRIREEESS SSSSS SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS

NNoteeesss ttoo tttttttttttttttthhhhheeeeeeeeeeeee CCCooooonnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnsssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssoooooooooooooooooooooooooooollllllllllllllllllllllllllliiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiidddddddddddddddddddddddddaaaaaaaaaaaaattttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttteeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeedddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddd FFiinnnaaaannnccciiiiiaalll SSSttaaaaatttteeemmmeennnnttts

FFoorrththhhhhhhhththhhhhhhhhhhhheeeeeeeeeeeeeperirirrododododooooooooeendndnndnnddddndndddddddddndddnedeeeeedeeeeeeeeee33300000000000000SeSptteememeeemememmmmmmbbebebbbebbebbebeeebebbbbbbbebbbeeeeeerrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr202020202222020200202222022222022222222217171717177777777

15 INVESTMENT IN ARBORGEN continued

projections were determined for each geography and end-use market. ArborGen’s addressable seedling market for each was estimated, as

was seedling type (e.g. softwood or hardwood, species, and production technology employed (i.e. traditional, MCP, varietal, transgenic)),

and sales price and cost by product for each market. The largest market and greatest valuation sensitivity resides with the US, where the

model assumed that over a 10-year period, the market size will grow to more than 900 million seedlings per annum, and that ArborGen’s

market share will increase to represent approximately 45% of that total market, and its customers will increasingly move to a higher

share of advanced treestocks in their loblolly pine estates, such that by the terminal year (i.e. year 10) 40% of ArborGen’s loblolly sales

will be in traditional open pollinated (OP) units, with 60% being represented by advanced genetics - i.e. 50% MCP and 10% varietal. For

the purposes of the fair value on acquisition assessment the composite discount rate applied to those cash fl ow projections was 21.3%

nominal pre-tax, and the terminal growth rate (TGR) was 3% nominal (i.e. zero real TGR under a 3% infl ation assumption). On the basis

of those assumptions the model derived a fair value of ArborGen’s identifi able assets and liabilities on acquisition of $124 million. This

value was then compared with that derived from ‘multiples’ applied to the future revenue numbers projected. Using NZ IFRS terminology,

these methods utilised Level 3 and Level 2 inputs respectively, refl ecting the observable certainty that each has.

For impairment testing purposes at balance date, as required by NZ IFRS, a value-in-use (VIU) approach was adopted. As this terminology

implies, this is the estimated value to be derived from continued ownership of the ArborGen business. The VIU analysis utilised the same

DCF model (as above) to derive mid-case ($288 million) and high-case ($407 million) value outcomes, by changing the discount rate, TGR,

and advanced genetics adoption assumptions. The mid-case used exactly the same cash fl ow assumptions as were used to determine the

$124 million ArborGen identifi able assets and liabilities acquisition value (above), however the discount rate applied to those cash fl ows

was 15.75% pre-tax and the TGR was 3.76% nominal. The high-case assumes United States advanced genetics sales of 80% (70% MCP

and 10% varietal) in the terminal year, and a pre-tax discount rate of 15.25% together with a TGR of 5% (i.e. 2% real). By way of example

of sensitivity, if the discount rate and the TGR assumptions in the high case were the same as used in the mid-case, the $407 million VIU

would decrease to $345 million, implying a product adoption sensitivity of $57 million (i.e. the difference between the mid-case value of

$288 million and $345 million), being the value uplift from moving from 60% advanced genetics adoption in the terminal year, to 80%.

16 GOODWILL

RUBICON GROUP

Sep 2017

US$m

June 2016

US$m

Opening balance 54 85

Disposition of Tenon North American operations

(1)

(36)–

Tenon North American operations impairment recognised in discontinued operations

(1)

–(31)

Goodwill 18 54

(1) Following Tenon’s sale of its North American operations all goodwill relates solely to the Tenon Clearwood operations. Recoverable

amount of goodwill is assessed for the business as a single cash generating unit. The recoverable amount of the goodwill is the greater of

its fair value less cost to sell or value in use. In assessing whether an impairment of the carrying value of TCLP (inclusive of goodwill) was

required at balance date, reference was made to the independent Grant Samuel Report prepared in February 2017. That report, which

followed a full sales process of the clearwood business (run by the Tenon independent directors) and which concluded with the TCLP

offer, derived a value range of $52 - $62.5 million. That value was based on a ~5-6 times EBITDA multiple on a fi scal 17 EBITDA forecast

of $10.5 million. Since the preparation of that report, TCLP’s earnings have been largely in line with the Grant Samuel report projection,

and as the purchase price paid was $55.2 million (i.e. towards the middle of the independent valuation range), there is no evidence of a

carrying value impairment to TCLP. Rubicon’s net equity investment in TCLP at 30 September is approximately $16 million, being the initial

investment of $14.2 million (i.e. ($55.2 million purchase price less $23.5 million acquisition debt x 44.88%) plus Rubicon’s share of net

earnings post-acquisition.

31
RURUBRUBRUBRUBRUICOCOOCOIONNNNNN LLLIMIIIMIITEDTEDTEAANAD SD SUBSSUIDIDIIIAARRRIAARES S

NNNNNNNooootteeeeessss ttoo ttthhee CCCooooonnnnsssooollliiidddddaaattteeeeddd FFiinnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaannnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnncccccccccccciiiiiiaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaalllllllll SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaatteemmmmmmmmmmeennnnnnnnnnnnnnnntttttttttss

FFoForrththhheeeepepepriririoododoeeeenddndndedededd33300SeSeeepptptpeemmbeeer 200201777111

17 TRADE, OTHER PAYABLES AND PROVISIONS

RUBICON GROUP

Sep 2017

US$m

June 2016

US$m

Trade creditors (10) (26)

Accrued employee benefi ts (7) (7)

Other payables (1) (3)

Accruals– (6)

Seedling deposits from customers (5) –

Trade, other payables and provisions (23) (42)

18 TERM AND CURRENT DEBT

RUBICON GROUP

Summary of repayment terms

ArborGen

Sep 2017

TCLPRubicon

Sep 2017

US$m

June 2016

US$m

Due for repayment:

Less than one year (8) (4) (6) (18) (29)

between one and two years (3) (4)– (7) (3)

between two and three years (1)–– (1) (3)

between three and four years


(1)–– (1) (29)

between four and fi ve years(1) (15)–(16)–

after fi ve years (8) ––(8)–

Total term and current debt (22) (23) (6) (51) (64)

Summary of Interest Rates by Repayment Period

Sep 2017

%

June 2016

%

Due for repayment:

Less than one year 6.99% 8.44%

between one and two years 4.75% 5.28%

between two and three years 4.95% 5.28%

between three and four years 4.95% 5.02%

between four and fi ve years4.69%–

after fi ve years4.95% –

Current debt - weighted average interest rate 6.99% 8.44%

Term debt - weighted average interest rate 4.75% 5.07%

The weighted average interest rates refl ect the effective interest rate, inclusive of fee amortisations.

32
RURUBBICOICOICON LN LLLNIMIMIMIIIMTTEDTEDANAANANAD SSUBSIDIIDIIDAARRRIREEESS SSSSS SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS

NNoteeesss ttoo tttttttttttttttthhhhheeeeeeeeeeeee CCCooooonnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnsssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssoooooooooooooooooooooooooooollllllllllllllllllllllllllliiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiidddddddddddddddddddddddddaaaaaaaaaaaaattttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttteeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeedddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddd FFiinnnaaaannnccciiiiiaalll SSSttaaaaatttteeemmmeennnnttts

FFoorrththhhhhhhhththhhhhhhhhhhhheeeeeeeeeeeeeperirirrododododooooooooeendndnndnnddddndndddddddddndddnedeeeeedeeeeeeeeee33300000000000000SeSptteememeeemememmmmmmbbebebbbebbebbebeeebebbbbbbbebbbeeeeeerrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr202020202222020200202222022222022222222217171717177777777

18 TERM AND CURRENT DEBT continued

Debt facilities available

ArborGen

US$m

TCLP

US$m

Rubicon

US$m

GROUP

US$m

September 2017 31 23 660

March 2018 31 21 6 58

September 2018 14 19 – 33

September 2019 1115 – 26

September 2020 1015 – 25

September 20219 15 –24

September 2022 9 – –9

Tenon repaid all of its debt following the sale of its US operations in December 2016 and the subsequent sale of its New Zealand clearwood

operations to TCLP.

In February 2017, TCLP signed a multi option agreement facility with the Bank of New Zealand (BNZ), which was utilised on 28 April 2017

in conjunction with the acquisition of Tenon’s New Zealand clearwood assets. The BNZ facility comprises a $23.5 million fi ve-year amortising

cash advance facility and a NZ$4.3 million interchangeable facility. TCLP’s cash advance facility limit reduces by $2.125 million every six

months from (and including) 31 December 2017, until 30 June 2019, when it reduces to $15 million and remains at that level through to

expiry on 28 April 2022. TCLP’s new facility has the following fi nancial ratios and covenants, each of which was met during the period -

- Leverage ratio is the ratio of net debt to EBITDA, with the maximum permitted leverage ratio being 2.75 times until 30 June 2018, and

thereafter 2.5 times

- Interest cover ratio is the ratio of EBIT to net interest expense, with the minimum permitted interest cover ratio being 3 times

- Total assets of the guaranteeing group must be at least 95% of the total assets of the TCLP group

- EBITDA of the guaranteeing group must be at least 95% of the EBITDA of the TCLP group.

Permitted distributions are restricted to 100% of net profi t after tax (NPAT) if the leverage ratio is less than 2 times, and 75% of NPAT if the

leverage ratio is greater than 2 times.

ArborGen has debt facilities with the following banks: Synovus Financial Corporation (Synovus) and AgSouth Farm Credit (AgSouth) in

the United States, and Westpac New Zealand Limited (Westpac) in New Zealand. ArborGen has a non-revolving promissory note issued

to AgSouth for $12.6 million bearing interest at 4.95%, with a maturity date of 1 May 2036, which is secured against the ArborGen’s

US real estate properties. Annual principal repayments of $0.6 million are due 1 May each year. ArborGen has a credit agreement with

Synovus, which provides for a $15 million revolving line of credit (LOC) bearing interest at the 30 day LIBOR base rate plus 2.75%, subject

to a minimum annual rate of 4.25%. The LOC has a maturity date of 31 August 2018 and is collateralised by all the United States assets

not otherwise pledged under the AgSouth note. The terms of the LOC limit borrowings to $6 million for a continuous 60 day period

33
RURUBRUBRUBRUBRUICOCOOCOIONNNNNN LLLIMIIIMIITEDTEDTEAANAD SD SUBSSUIDIDIIIAARRRIAARES S

NNNNNNNooootteeeeessss ttoo ttthhee CCCooooonnnnsssooollliiidddddaaattteeeeddd FFiinnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaannnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnncccccccccccciiiiiiaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaalllllllll SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaatteemmmmmmmmmmeennnnnnnnnnnnnnnntttttttttss

FFoForrththhheeeepepepriririoododoeeeenddndndedededd33300SeSeeepptptpeemmbeeer 200201777111

18 TERM AND CURRENT DEBT continued

between 1 March and 31 August of each year. The Synovus agreement requires ArborGen to maintain a $6 million certifi cate of deposit

with Synovus until settlement of the LOC obligation. The credit agreements with both Synovus and AgSouth require ArborGen to maintain

a minimum net worth of $24 million, which was met at 30 September 2017. ArborGen New Zealand Unlimited (ArborGen NZ) has an

agreement with Westpac for a multi option credit facility (MOCF) for an amount up to NZ$4.25 million, with a maturity date of 1 November

2018. The Westpac facility is collateralised by mortgages over ArborGen NZ’s assets. ArborGen NZ met all of the fi nancial covenants required

by Westpac as of 30 September 2017, including: EBIT/Interest coverage of more than 1.75 times, equity ratio of not less than 60% of

adjusted tangible assets, and loan:value ratio less than 50% of secured property.

Rubicon utilised the proceeds of Tenon’s (December 2016) capital return to repay its $20 million debt with the ANZ in full, so that at

30 September 2017 Rubicon had no outstanding bank debt facilities. In 2015 Rubicon issued $7 million of unsecured subordinated

debt notes (Notes), which were taken up by Rubicon Board and management. On 31 March 2017, $2 million (plus accrued interest

$0.3 million) of these Notes were repaid, leaving Rubicon’s major shareholder and Director David Knott holding all the remaining Notes

totalling $5 million (plus accrued interest). Interest accrued on that balance was capitalised to the principal, and at 30 September 2017

the outstanding balance was $6 million (2016: $7 million). From 30 September 2017, interest is to be paid monthly, at the rate of 12%

per annum, refl ecting the unsecured nature of the Notes, and is inclusive of all fees. The Notes have a maturity date of 1 July 2018.

19 CAPITAL

RUBICON GROUP

Sept 2017

US$m

June 2016

US$m

Share capital at the beginning of the period188 188

Issue of shares

(1)

13 –

Share capital 201 188

Sept 2017June 2016

Opening shares on issue 409,051,378 409,051,378

Issue of shares

(1)

78,856,965 –

NNumber of shares on issue487,908,343409,051,378

(1) In June 2017 Rubicon placed 56.8 million ordinary shares to Libra Fund LP and 22.1 million to Knott Partners LP. The shares were issued

at the 10-day VWAP (NZ21.78 cents per share) raising $12.5 million (NZ$17.175 million) in new capital.

34
20 RESERVES

RUBICON GROUP

Retained earnings

Sep 2017

US$m

June 2016

US$m

Opening balance (46) (30)

Net earnings(6)(16)

Revaluation transferred to retained earnings on disposal

(1)

1–

Closing balance (51) (46)

Revaluation reserve

Opening balance 1 1

Revaluation transferred to retained earnings on disposal

(1)

(1)–

Closing balance – 1

Currency translation reserve

Opening balance (3) (2)

Translation of independent foreign operations – (1)

Transfer to earnings3–

Closing balance – (3)

Total reserves (51) (48)

(1) The revaluation reserve relates to Tenon’s North American operations disposed.

21 EQUITY ATTRIBUTABLE TO MINORITY SHAREHOLDERS

RUBICON GROUP

Sep 2017

US$m

June 2016

US$m

Opening balance 40 49

TCLP minority investment17 –

Tenon capital return

(1)

(46) –

Net earnings– (8)

Movement in hedge reserve – 1

Tenon dividend (1)(2)

Equity attributable to minority shareholders 10 40

(1) In the period Tenon completed two court-approved share cancellations and pro-rata returns of capital, the minority share of which was

$46 million. Upon consolidation, the capital returns paid to Rubicon are eliminated.

22 CAPITAL EXPENDITURE COMMITMENTS

Other than the outstanding deferred settlement payments of $15 million in relation to the ArborGen acquisition (refer note 15), the Group

had no material capital expenditure commitments as at 30 September 2017.

NNoteeesss ttoo tttttttttttttttthhhhheeeeeeeeeeeee CCCooooonnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnsssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssoooooooooooooooooooooooooooollllllllllllllllllllllllllliiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiidddddddddddddddddddddddddaaaaaaaaaaaaattttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttteeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeedddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddd FFiinnnaaaannnccciiiiiaalll SSSttaaaaatttteeemmmeennnnttts

FFoorrththhhhhhhhththhhhhhhhhhhhheeeeeeeeeeeeeperirirrododododooooooooeendndnndnnddddndndddddddddndddnedeeeeedeeeeeeeeee33300000000000000SeSptteememeeemememmmmmmbbebebbbebbebbebeeebebbbbbbbebbbeeeeeerrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr202020202222020200202222022222022222222217171717177777777

35
23 GROUP LEASE COMMITMENTS

The expected future minimum rental payments required under leases (including capitalised fi nance leases) that have initial or remaining

non-cancellable lease terms in excess of one year at 30 September 2017 are as follows:

RUBICON GROUP

Sep 2017

US$m

June 2016

US$m

Lease commitments are as follows:

Within one year 2 10

two years 2 8

three years 2 6

four years 2 4

fi ve years 2 3

After fi ve years 12 12

Total lease commitments 22 43

Lease commitments relate mainly to occupancy leases of buildings and vehicles.

ArborGen has a lease agreement for its research, development and headquarters facility at its head offi ce complex in Ridgeville South

Carolina. The 20-year lease, which commenced in February 2012, has 14.5 years remaining. Under the terms of the lease ArborGen is

obligated to pay annual rent of $1.4 million and has an option to purchase the facility at the higher of market value or the landlord’s

investment plus 5%. This lease is treated as a fi nance lease under NZ IFRS, which means that both the lease asset and liability are

capitalised on the balance sheet. Over the term of the lease the asset is depreciated and the lease liability amortised.

In order to provide the necessary level of support required to have the facility developed, in 2012 each of the ArborGen partners

agreed to guarantee $2 million (each) of ArborGen’s future lease payments. Under the ArborGen sale and purchase agreement,

Rubicon assumed the guarantees of both International Paper and WestRock (given it would be the 100% owner of ArborGen, and

in effect, economically exposed to the full lease commitment in any case). WestRock and International Paper each have the right to

call for a $0.5 million payment from Rubicon on 30 June 2019, which if called would eliminate Rubicon’s assumed partner guarantee.

All other leases, and therefore lease commitments in the above table, are operating leases.

24 REMUNERATION

Key management compensation

Salaries and other short-term employee benefi ts paid to Rubicon, ArborGen, TCLP and Tenon key management employees were $8

million (June 2016: $3 million), which includes payments of $5 million to exiting employees of Tenon.

In December 2016 the period the fi nal payment ($0.3 million), in respect of the Rubicon non-executive Director and executives 2013

TSR plans, was made. This was expensed, and these plans were both terminated in the 2014 fi nancial year.

Upon the 100% acquisition of ArborGen by Rubicon, a plan was put in place to retain ArborGen senior management. The benefi t

under this plan totals $2 million, and provides for the payment by ArborGen of up to $1 million on 1 July 2018 and another $1 million

on 1 July 2019 to senior executives. The package is split across ten individuals, with the requirement being that an individual must still

be employed by ArborGen on those respective dates in order for them to receive a payment on those dates. If an individual is made

redundant by ArborGen, then they will immediately receive the benefi t of the plan.

RURUBRUBRUBRUBRUICOCOOCOIONNNNNN LLLIMIIIMIITEDTEDTEAANAD SD SUBSSUIDIDIIIAARRRIAARES S

NNNNNNNooootteeeeessss ttoo ttthhee CCCooooonnnnsssooollliiidddddaaattteeeeddd FFiinnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaannnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnncccccccccccciiiiiiaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaalllllllll SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaatteemmmmmmmmmmeennnnnnnnnnnnnnnntttttttttss

FFoForrththhheeeepepepriririoododoeeeenddndndedededd33300SeSeeepptptpeemmbeeer 200201777111

36
25 SEGMENTAL INFORMATION SUMMARY

The Group has two reportable segments and their analysis is as follows:

RUBICON GROUP

Appearance and wood products

15 months

Sep 2017

US$m

Year ended

June 2016

US$m

Total revenue 263 430

Operating revenue - discontinued 154 340

Operating revenue - continuing 109 90

Financing expense (1) –

Net earnings after taxation from continuing operations 9 6

Net earnings after taxation from discontinued operations (13) (27)

Total assets 62189

Total assets - discontinued5136

Total assets - continuing5753

Liabilities(33)(81)

Liabilities - discontinued(1)(73)

Liabilities - continuing(32)(8)

Capital expenditure (3) (5)

Depreciation (2) (1)

Forestry genetics

Operating revenue

6 –

Share of (loss)/profi t from associate

1 1

Financing expense

(1) –

Net earnings after taxation from continuing operations

11

Total assets

19391

Investment in associate

–91

Liabilities

(53)–

Capital expenditure

(1)

(2) (4)

Depreciation and amortisation of intellectual property


(2) –

Corporate

Financing expense

(2) (2)

Net earnings after taxation from continuing operations

(3) (4)

Total assets

13 1

Liabilities

(22) (28)

RURUBBICOICOICON LN LLLNIMIMIMIIIMTTEDTEDANAANANAD SSUBSIDIIDIIDAARRRIREEESS SSSSS SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS

NNoteeesss ttoo tttttttttttttttthhhhheeeeeeeeeeeee CCCooooonnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnsssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssoooooooooooooooooooooooooooollllllllllllllllllllllllllliiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiidddddddddddddddddddddddddaaaaaaaaaaaaattttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttteeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeedddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddd FFiinnnaaaannnccciiiiiaalll SSSttaaaaatttteeemmmeennnnttts

FFoorrththhhhhhhhththhhhhhhhhhhhheeeeeeeeeeeeeperirirrododododooooooooeendndnndnnddddndndddddddddndddnedeeeeedeeeeeeeeee33300000000000000SeSptteememeeemememmmmmmbbebebbbebbebbebeeebebbbbbbbebbbeeeeeerrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr202020202222020200202222022222022222222217171717177777777

37
RUBICON GROUP

Total Group

15 months

Sep 2017

US$m

Year ended

June 2016

US$m

Total revenue

269 430

Operating revenue - discontinued

154 340

Operating revenue - continuing - per income statement

115 90

Share of (loss)/profi t from associate

1 1

Financing expense

(4) (2)

Net earnings after taxation from continuing operations

7 3

Net earnings after taxation from discontinued operations

(13) (27)

Total assets - per balance sheet

268 281

Total assets - discontinued

5136

Total assets - continuing

263145

Investment in associate

–91

Liabilities - per balance sheet

(108)(109)

Liabilities - discontinued

(1)(73)

Liabilities - continuing

(107)(36)

Capital expenditure

(5)(9)

Depreciation and amortisation of intellectual property

(4) (1)


The Group’s geographical analysis is as follows:

RUBICON GROUP

Australasia and South America

Sep 2017

US$m

June 2016

US$m

Operating revenue 34 23

Non current assets

(2)

46 36

North America and Europe

Operating revenue 81 67

Non current assets

(2)

141 136

Total Group

Operating revenue 115 90

Non current assets

(2)

187 172

(1) Includes contributions to ArborGen in the June 2016 year.

(2) Excludes deferred taxation asset and fi nancial instruments.

RURUBRUBRUBRUBRUICOCOOCOIONNNNNN LLLIMIIIMIITEDTEDTEAANAD SD SUBSSUIDIDIIIAARRRIAARES S

NNNNNNNooootteeeeessss ttoo ttthhee CCCooooonnnnsssooollliiidddddaaattteeeeddd FFiinnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaannnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnncccccccccccciiiiiiaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaalllllllll SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaatteemmmmmmmmmmeennnnnnnnnnnnnnnntttttttttss

FFoForrththhheeeepepepriririoododoeeeenddndndedededd33300SeSeeepptptpeemmbeeer 200201777111

25 SEGMENTAL INFORMATION SUMMARY continued


38

26 PRINCIPAL OPERATIONS

Rubicon Limited (a New Zealand incorporated limited liability company) is the holding company of the Rubicon Group. The principal

subsidiaries, as at 30 September 2017, were:

Country of

Domicile

% Interest

Sep 2017

% Interest

June 2016

Balance

Date

Principal Activity

Principal subsidiaries

Rubicon Forests Holdings LimitedNZ10010030 SepHolds 59.78% interest in Tenon

Rubicon TC Holdings Limited Partnership

(1)

NZ10030 SepHolds a 44.88% interest in TCLP

Rubicon Clearwood GP Limited

(2)

NZ10030 SepGeneral Partner to TCLP

Rubicon Industries USA LLCUSA10010030 JuneHolds ArborGen, Inc investment

Tenon Clearwood Limited Partnership

(2)

NZ44.8831 MarchWood products

Tenon Clearwood Limited Partnership

subsidiary

Taupo Wood Solutions LLCUSA10031 MarchWood products

Tenon LimitedNZ59.7859.7830 JuneWood products

ArborGen Inc

(3)

USA10033.3431 MarchForestry genetics

ArborGen Inc subsidiaries

ArborGen Comercie de Produtos

Florestal Importacao e Exportacao LTDA

Brazil10010031 MarchForestry genetics

ArborGen Technologia Florestal LTDABrazil10010031 MarchHolding company

ArborGen New Zealand Holding LLCUSA10010031 MarchHolding company

ArborGen New Zealand UnlimitedNZ10010031 MarchForestry genetics

ArborGen Australia Holdings Pty LtdAustralia10010031 MarchHolding company

ArborGen Australia Pty LtdAustralia10010031 MarchForestry genetics

(1) On 28 April 2017, following the preparation of an independent appraisal report by Grant Samuel and a Tenon shareholder vote (in which

Rubicon did not participate), TCLP acquired the Clearwood assets and operations from Tenon. TCLP is a Limited Partnership, and given its

extensive management knowledge of this business, the partners agreed that Rubicon should fulfi l the General Partner operational role for

TCLP (see footnote (2) below). Rubicon also has a 50.01% interest in TCLP, being a direct ownership of 44.88% of the issued TCLP shares,

and (inclusive of rights under separate voting rights agreements) a 50.01% voting control of TCLP. Rubicon Board and management* (and

their associates), who in aggregate hold 5.13% of TCLP (paid for at the same per share price as the total TCLP transaction), have each

given (subject to their right to withdraw) their TCLP voting rights to Rubicon. In addition to raising the funds required to subsequently

complete the 100% acquisition of ArborGen, this ownership and voting right structure fulfi lled the dual Rubicon objectives of incentivising

management to maximise the performance of TCLP and of satisfying the understanding with the TCLP investing parties at the time that

Rubicon’s direct ownership would be below 50% after fi nal completion of the transaction. The TCLP Limited Partners have pre-emptive

rights (in any subsequent transaction, at the transaction ‘transfer’ price proposed) over existing Partners shares should they choose to sell.

(2) Rubicon Clearwood GP Limited is the General Partner of the TCLP, and receives a fee of $0.25 million per annum ($0.1 million received

in period) in return for management services provided. The General Partner can be changed by a majority vote of the Limited Partners.

(3) On 28 June 2017 Rubicon, acquired the 66.66% of ArborGen shares held by its then partners International Paper and WestRock, and as

a result increased Rubicon’s 33.34% ownership interest to 100% of ArborGen’s issued share capital, or 95% by economic interest (given

the 5% warrants outstanding to third parties relating to the ArborGen acquisition of Cellfor in 2012).

* Hugh Fletcher is a trustee of The Fletcher Trust and JMC Fletcher Family Trust, and a director and 20% shareholder of Fletcher Brothers

Limited, each of which also own TCLP shares.

NNoteeesss ttoo tttttttttttttttthhhhheeeeeeeeeeeee CCCooooonnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnsssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssoooooooooooooooooooooooooooollllllllllllllllllllllllllliiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiidddddddddddddddddddddddddaaaaaaaaaaaaattttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttteeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeedddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddd FFiinnnaaaannnccciiiiiaalll SSSttaaaaatttteeemmmeennnnttts

FFoorrththhhhhhhhththhhhhhhhhhhhheeeeeeeeeeeeeperirirrododododooooooooeendndnndnnddddndndddddddddndddnedeeeeedeeeeeeeeee33300000000000000SeSptteememeeemememmmmmmbbebebbbebbebbebeeebebbbbbbbebbbeeeeeerrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr202020202222020200202222022222022222222217171717177777777


39

27 FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

(a) Market risk

(i) Exposure to currency risk

The functional currency of the Group is the US$ and the risk to the Group’s equity and earnings are from assets, liabilities, revenues and

costs in currencies denominated in currencies other than US$. The Group’s exposure to foreign currency risks on fi nancial instruments is

shown in the following:

RUBICON GROUP

Sep 2017June 2016

in US$m

US$Non

US$

US$Non

US$

Cash and liquid deposits 28 3 2 –

Trade debtors and other receivables 5 3 28 4

Trade creditors and other payables(10)(13) (27) (11)

Current debt(17)(1) (29)–

Non current debt(30)(3) (35)–

Gross balance sheet exposure (11) (7)

(ii) Exposure to interest rate risk

The following exchange rates applied during the year:

Average rate

(1)

Spot rate

Sep 2017June 2016Sep 2017June 2016

NZ$:US$0.71620.66780.72350.7117

US$:R$0.31650.3161

US$:AU$0.79030.7840

(1) These are merely arithmetical averages not hedged rates.

Foreign exchange contracts

As at 30 September 2017, TCLP had foreign exchange contracts converting US$10 million and €0.45 million into NZ$14.7 million. TCLP

is a US$ functional currency business, and as a matter of course enters into foreign exchange forward contracts in order to hedge its NZ$

costs. All the US$ contracts were due for settlement by 20 November 2017 and the € contracts are to be settled by 5 December 2017. As

at 30 September 2017 the mark-to-market valuation adjustment on the contracts was a gain of less than $0.1 million and was included

in the cash fl ow hedging reserve.

As at 30 June 2016, the Group had no Foreign Exchange contracts outstanding.

Sensitivity Analysis - gross balance sheet exposure

Given the small size of the gross balance sheet exposure shown above, any movement in the NZ$, R$ and AU$ against the US$ is unlikely

to be material. Rubicon has nil bank debt (2016: $18.9 million) at 30 September 2017, and its subordinated Notes of $6 million (2016:

$7 million) (refer to note 18) are at a fi xed interest rate. At 30 September 2017, Tenon limited had nil debt, TCLP had $23.5 million drawn

at fi xed short term rates and ArborGen had $21.8 million. The weighted average interest rate of borrowings and interest rate hedges are

shown in note 18 term and current debt.

RURUBRUBRUBRUBRUICOCOOCOIONNNNNN LLLIMIIIMIITEDTEDTEAANAD SD SUBSSUIDIDIIIAARRRIAARES S

NNNNNNNooootteeeeessss ttoo ttthhee CCCooooonnnnsssooollliiidddddaaattteeeeddd FFiinnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaannnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnncccccccccccciiiiiiaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaalllllllll SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaatteemmmmmmmmmmeennnnnnnnnnnnnnnntttttttttss

FFoForrththhheeeepepepriririoododoeeeenddndndedededd33300SeSeeepptptpeemmbeeer 200201777111


40

27 FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS continued

(b) Credit risk

(i) Exposure to credit risk

The carrying amount of fi nancial assets represents the maximum credit exposure, which at 30 September 2017 was $40 million of

trade and other receivables, and cash and liquid deposits (2016: $38 million). Cash and liquid deposits are only held with banks that

are part of the Group’s banking consortiums. In the event of default, cash balances may be set off against obligations owing by the

Group to its lenders. Moody’s credit ratings of the counterparties for cash and liquid deposits are all rated as investment grade. The

status of trade debtors, is as follows:

RUBICON GROUP

Sep 2017

US$

June 2016

NZ$

Neither past due or impaired 6 28

Past due but not impaired 1 month 1 2

2 month – 1

7 31

Less provision for doubtful debts – –

Net Trade Debtors 7 31

TCLP and ArborGen have strong histories of trade debtor collections and there is no reason to believe that the debtors will not be

collected. TCLP has credit insurance for a portion of the US based customers.

(c) Liquidity risk

The following are contractual maturities of fi nancial liabilities and net settled derivatives (excluding estimated interest payments). The

amounts disclosed are the contractual undiscounted cash fl ows.

Financial liabilities

Carrying

value

US$m

Fair

value

US$m

0-6

months

US$m

6-12

months

US$m

1-2

years

US$m

2-5

years

US$m

Over

5 years

US$m

30 June 2016

Non derivative fi nancial liabilities

Trade and other payables (41) (41) (37) (4) –––

Debt (64) (64)(2) (27) (3) (32)–

Interest–– (1) (2) (1) (2)–

Financial liabilities as at 30 June 2016 (105) (105) (40) (33) (4) (34) –

30 September 2017

Non derivative fi nancial liabilities

Trade and other payables (23) (23) (19) (3)(1)––

Debt (51) (51) (10) (8) (7) (182)(8)

Finance Leases(13)(13) – (1) (1) (2)(9)

Deferred settlement(15)(15)(5)(10)–––

Financial liabilities as at 30 Sep 2017 (102) (102) (34) (22) (9) (20)(17)

RURUBBICOICOICON LN LLLNIMIMIMIIIMTTEDTEDANAANANAD SSUBSIDIIDIIDAARRRIREEESS SSSSS SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS

NNoteeesss ttoo tttttttttttttttthhhhheeeeeeeeeeeee CCCooooonnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnsssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssoooooooooooooooooooooooooooollllllllllllllllllllllllllliiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiidddddddddddddddddddddddddaaaaaaaaaaaaattttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttteeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeedddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddd FFiinnnaaaannnccciiiiiaalll SSSttaaaaatttteeemmmeennnnttts

FFoorrththhhhhhhhththhhhhhhhhhhhheeeeeeeeeeeeeperirirrododododooooooooeendndnndnnddddndndddddddddndddnedeeeeedeeeeeeeeee33300000000000000SeSptteememeeemememmmmmmbbebebbbebbebbebeeebebbbbbbbebbbeeeeeerrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr202020202222020200202222022222022222222217171717177777777


41

28 CONTINGENT LIABILITIES

Tenon Limited has recorded a contingent liability relating to the uncertainty of the tax treatment of certain debts within the context of its

current liquidation process, however Tenon intends to approach Inland Revenue to confi rm that no unexpected tax liability arises. If any

tax liability was to arise, it is not expected to exceed $1 million. There are no other known contingent liabilities in the Rubicon Group as at

30 September 2017 (June 2016: nil). (Refer also to note 23, which shows lease commitment guarantees)

29 ASSET BACKING

At 30 September 2017 the net asset backing was 31 cents per share (cps) (NZ$ 42 cps), (2016: 34 cps, NZ$ 48 cps); and net tangible asset

backing was 6 cps (NZ$ 8 cps) (2016: 4 cps, NZ$ 6 cps).

30 NON-GAAP MEASURES

Rubicon uses EBITDA when discussing fi nancial performance. This is a non-GAAP fi nancial measure and is not recognised within NZ

IFRS. As it is not necessarily uniformly defi ned or utilised this measure may not be comparable with similarly titled measures used by

other companies. Non-GAAP fi nancial measures should not be viewed in isolation or considered as a substitute for measures reported in

accordance with GAAP. Rubicon believes EBITDA provides useful information, as it is used internally to evaluate performance, and it is also

a measure that equity analysts focus on for comparative company performance purposes, as the measure removes distortions caused by

differences in asset age, depreciation policies and debt:equity structures. The following tables reconcile Net Earnings to operating earnings

before fi nancing expense and then to EBITDA for Tenon / TCLP and ArborGen.

TCLP / Tenon Clearwood

15 months

Sep 2017

US$m

Net Earnings after taxation from continuing operations 9

plus Tax expense –

plus Financing expense 1

Operating earnings before fi nancing expense 10

plus Depreciation and amortisations 2

EBITDA 12

ArborGen

Net Earnings after taxation from continuing operations 1

plus Tax expense –

plus Financing expense 1

Operating earnings before fi nancing expense 2

plus Depreciation and amortisations 2

EBITDA 4

RURUBRUBRUBRUBRUICOCOOCOIONNNNNN LLLIMIIIMIITEDTEDTEAANAD SD SUBSSUIDIDIIIAARRRIAARES S

NNNNNNNooootteeeeessss ttoo ttthhee CCCooooonnnnsssooollliiidddddaaattteeeeddd FFiinnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaannnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnncccccccccccciiiiiiaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaalllllllll SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaatteemmmmmmmmmmeennnnnnnnnnnnnnnntttttttttss

FFoForrththhheeeepepepriririoododoeeeenddndndedededd33300SeSeeepptptpeemmbeeer 200201777111

42
31 DISCOUNTINUED OPERATIONS

During the 2017 year, Tenon disposed of its US and Australian operating assets (classifi ed as discontinued in these fi nancial statements),

sold its Tenon Clearwood operations to TCLP, and Tenon’s shareholders approved the liquidation of the Tenon group of companies,

expected to be in early 2018. For the consolidated Rubicon Group the sale to TCLP is not treated as a sale under NZ IFRS, as control was

maintained throughout. Tenon utilised the majority of the proceeds of sale to repay debt ($38 million) and return capital to shareholders

($114 million), the balance was retained to meet costs to liquidate Tenon, with a fi nal liquidation payment to shareholders yet to occur.


RUBICON GROUP

Income Statement

for the period ended

15 months

Sep 2017

US$m

Year ended

June 2016

US$m

Operating revenue 154 340

Profi t before taxation

(1)

(2) (23)

Loss on disposal

(2)

(2) –

Tax expense on profi t before taxation (9) (4)

Net profi t after taxation from discontinued operations (13) (27)

(1) Profi t before taxation from discontinued operations includes:

Depreciation –(2)

Financing expense(2)(3)

(2) Loss on disposal

Cash infl ow on sale of subsidiaries113

Costs of sale(6)

107

Recognised values on sale

Inventory68

Trade and other receivables28

Fixed assets10

Goodwill36

Trade and other payables(32)

Provision for taxation (1)

109

Net loss on sale(2)

Statement of cash fl ows

for the period ended

15 months

Sep 2017

US$m

Year ended

June 2016

US$m

Net cash from:

Operating activities127

Investing activities107(1)

Financing activities(1)(3)

Net cash from discontinued operations10723

RURUBICOICON LN LLLN N IMIMIMIIITTEDTEDANANNAD S SUBSIDIIDIIDAARIRIRRIESEESES SSSSSSSSSSSSSSS SESEESSSSSSSSS

Notteeeess ttoo ttttttttttttttthhhhheeeeeeeeeeee CCCooooonnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssooooooooooooooooooooooolllllllllllllllllllllllllllliiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiddddddddddddddddddddddddddddaaaaaaaaaaaaaattttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttteeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeedddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddd FFinnaaaannnccciiiiiaaalll SSSttaaaaattttteeemmmeennnnttts

FoForrthththhhhhthhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhheeeeperirioodododoooooooeendndnndnnddddddndndddddddndededeeeeeeeee333300000000000SeSpttemeemeemeemmmmmmmemmbebebebebebbbbbebebbbbbbbbeebbbbebbebeerrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr202020202020202022202222220222220222222222222217171717771777777

43
To the shareholders of Rubicon Limited

Report on the consolidated fi nancial statements

Opinion

In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated fi nancial

statements of Rubicon Limited (the company) and its

subsidiaries (the group) on pages 8 to 42:

i. present fairly in all material respects the group’s fi nancial

position as at 30 September 2017 and its fi nancial

performance and cash fl ows for the 15 months ended on

that date; and

ii. comply with New Zealand Equivalents to International

Financial Reporting Standards and International Financial

Reporting Standards.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated fi nancial

statements which comprise:

— the consolidated statement of fi nancial position as at 30

September 2017;

— t he consolidated statements of comprehensive income,

changes in equity and cash fl ows for the 15 months then

ended; and

— notes, including a summary of signifi cant accounting

policies and other explanatory information.

Basis for opinion

We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (New Zealand) (‘ISAs (NZ)’). We believe that the

audit evidence we have obtained is suffi cient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.

We are independent of the group in accordance with Professional and Ethical Standard 1 (Revised) Code of Ethics for Assurance

Practitioners issued by the New Zealand Auditing and Assurance Standards Board and the International Ethics Standards Board for

Accountants’ Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (IESBA Code), and we have fulfi lled our other ethical responsibilities in

accordance with these requirements and the IESBA Code.

Our responsibilities under ISAs (NZ) are further described in the auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the consolidated fi nancial

statements section of our report.

Our fi rm has also provided other services to the group in relation to other assurance and tax services. Subject to certain

restrictions, partners and employees of our fi rm may also deal with the group on normal terms within the ordinary course of

trading activities of the business of the group. These matters have not impaired our independence as auditor of the group. The

fi rm has no other relationship with, or interest in, the group.

Materiality

The scope of our audit was infl uenced by our application of materiality. Materiality helped us to determine the nature, timing and extent

of our audit procedures and to evaluate the effect of misstatements, both individually and on the consolidated fi nancial statements

as a whole. The materiality for the consolidated fi nancial statements as a whole was set at USD$3m determined with reference to a

benchmark of group net assets. We chose the benchmark because, in our view, this is a key measure of the group’s performance.

Independent Auditor’s Report

$

$

44
Refer to Note 26 and Note 31 to the Financial

Statements.

At the commencement of the current fi nancial

period, the group had a 59.78% interest in Tenon,

a consolidated subsidiary of the group. During the

period, Tenon’s business has been substantially

restructured with:

1. the sale of its US operating assets to third

parties;

2. the sale of its Taupo Clearwood sawmill

operations to a NZ partnership in which

Rubicon has a 44.88% interest which

together with voting agreements with other

partners has allowed Rubicon to maintain

control of the Taupo Clearwood business

throughout the period; and

3. a decision to liquidate the remaining Tenon

companies.

With the exception of the Taupo Clearwood

results which are classifi ed as arising from

continuing operations, all other results have been

classifi ed as discontinued in the Consolidated

Income Statement.

The restructure of Tenon is a key audit matter

because of its signifi cance and complexity of

accounting (including the assessment of control)

to the group and the overall consolidated fi nancial

statements.

Our audit procedures in this area included among others:

Reviewing the sale and purchase agreement for the US Distribution

disposal and confi rming that the calculation of the loss on disposal

was in accordance with the agreement.

Reviewing the sale and purchase agreement for the sale of the

Taupo Clearwood business and the agreements in place to give

Rubicon additional voting rights such that it has maintained control

and confi rming that the accounting refl ects the continuing control of

Rubicon.

Reviewing the costs of liquidating the residual businesses.

Ensuring that the disclosures in the consolidated fi nancial statements

are consistent with the restructure of Tenon.

Based on our audit procedures we have no signifi cant matters to

report with respect to the accounting for the restructure of Tenon,

including the disposal of the US Distribution business and the

ongoing investment of Rubicon in Taupo Clearwood, or with the

related disclosures in the fi nancial statements.

RUBRUBRUICOICOOOICCN LN LLNNLIMIIMITEDTEDTEDEANAND SUBSUBSUBIDIDIDIIDIARAARARIARARARARARRIARIRRRARARARRARARIRARIRRARAAARARARRRRARRARARRAAREEEEEES ESES S SEEEESS EE

Inddddddeeppeennnnnnnnnnnnnnnndddddeeeeeeeeeeeennnnnnnnnttt AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuudddddddddddddddddddddddiiiiiiiiiiiittttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttoooooooooooooooooorrrrrrrrrrr’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’sssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRReeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeppoorrrrtttt

Key Audit Matters

Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgement, were of most signifi cance in our audit of the consolidated

fi nancial statements in the current period. We summarise below those matters and our key audit procedures to address those matters

in order that the shareholders as a body may better understand the process by which we arrived at our audit opinion. Our procedures

were undertaken in the context of and solely for the purpose of our statutory audit opinion on the consolidated fi nancial statements

as a whole and we do not express discrete opinions on separate elements of the consolidated fi nancial statements.

The key audit matter How the matter was addressed in our audit

Restructure of Tenon investment

45
Refer to Note 15 to the Financial Statements.

On 28 June 2017, the group acquired 66.66% of

the outstanding shares in ArborGen (in addition to

the 33.34% previously held) for consideration of

USD28.5m.

The accounting for this transaction is complex

due to the signifi cant estimates and judgements

that are required to determine the values of the

consideration transferred and the identifi cation

and measurement of the fair values of assets

acquired and liabilities assumed.

Due to the size and complexity of the acquisition,

we considered this to be a key audit matter.

Our audit procedures in this area included among others:

Reviewing the ArborGen sale and purchase agreement and the

audited fi nancial statements as at 31 March 2017 to assess whether

the components of the consideration given and the identifi able

ArborGen assets acquired and liabilities assumed were complete and

appropriate.

Using our valuation specialists, reviewing and challenging

management’s assessment of:

1. The fair value of the consideration given for the acquisition.

2. The identifi cation and fair values of the ArborGen tangible and

intangible assets acquired (with a particular focus on the intangible

asset acquired) and liabilities assumed.

3. The future forecasts of business performance, and comparing

recent forecasts with actual fi nancial performance.

Challenging management’s assertion that the price paid to acquire the

remaining 66.66% was a bargain purchase and also management’s

calculation of the loss on the deemed disposal of the existing interest

in ArborGen as required by the relevant accounting standards.

Assessing the appropriateness of the valuation methodology used by

management, testing the assumptions used against other external

market data, where available, and other valuation analyses performed

by third party valuers and subjecting the key assumptions to a

sensitivity analysis to assess whether the valuations fell within an

acceptable range.

Ensuring that the underlying accounting was appropriate and that the

disclosures properly refl ected the judgements and estimates made.

The calculations underlying the fair value assessments are by their

nature subjective and complex and the fair values are sensitive to

the assumptions adopted particularly those in respect of discount

rates, the rates of adoption by the US market of a greater share of

advanced treestocks, and the speed of that adoption. In light of this,

there is a wide range of acceptable outcomes with respect to the

fair value assessments. Based on our own understanding of the

ArborGen business and our own assessment of the valuation ranges,

we are satisfi ed that the fair values determined by management are

supportable.

RURUBRUBRUBRUBRUICOICOCOOCNNN N LNNLIMIMIIITEDTEDTEAANNAD SD UBSSIDIDIIIIDAAARRIRARES

IIIIIInnnnnnddddeeppppppeeenndddeeeentt AAAAAuuuuudddiiitttooorrr’’’’’ssss RRRReeeepppoorrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrtttttttttttttttttttttttttttt

The key audit matter How the matter was addressed in our audit

ArborGen business combination

46
Refer to Note 16 and Note 31 to the Financial

Statements.

After the restructure of Tenon, the group

continues to carry goodwill of USD18m in

relation to its investment in Taupo Clearwood.

The group is required to test its goodwill for

impairment annually.

We focussed on this matter as management

are required to make signifi cant judgements to

determine the assumptions underpinning the

impairment assessment. In light of the sales

process run by the independent directors of

Tenon which concluded with the sale of Tenon

Clearwood in April 2017, management has

based its assessment on this transaction which

was supported by a third party independent

valuation report, and which obtained the

approval of Tenon shareholders in order for it to

proceed.

RUBRUBRUICOICOOOICCN LN LLNNLIMIIMITEDTEDTEDEANAND SUBSUBSUBIDIDIDIIDIARAARARIARARARARARRIARIRRRARARARRARARIRARIRRARAAARARARRRRARRARARRAAREEEEEES ESES S SEEEESS EE

Inddddddeeppeennnnnnnnnnnnnnnndddddeeeeeeeeeeeennnnnnnnnttt AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuudddddddddddddddddddddddiiiiiiiiiiiittttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttoooooooooooooooooorrrrrrrrrrr’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’sssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRReeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeppoorrrrtttt

The key audit matter How the matter was addressed in our audit

Valuation of Taupo Clearwood goodwill

Our audit procedures in this area included among others:

Evaluating, together with our valuation specialists, whether the

overall approach taken by management was appropriate.

Comparing the assumptions regarding trading post April 2017 to

actual results achieved.

Based on our audit procedures, we found the impairment

assessment undertaken by management supported the carrying

value of the Taupo Clearwood goodwill at balance date.

Other Information

The Directors, on behalf of the group, are responsible for the other information included in the Annual Report.

Other information includes the Chairman’s report, Governance, Board of Directors and Investor Information. Our opinion on the

consolidated fi nancial statements does not cover any other information and we do not express any form of assurance conclusion

thereon.

In connection with our audit of the consolidated fi nancial statements our responsibility is to read the other information and, in

doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the consolidated fi nancial statements or our

knowledge obtained in the audit or otherwise appears materially misstated. If, based on the work we have performed, we

conclude that there is a material misstatement of this other information, we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to

report in this regard.

Use of this Independent Auditor’s Report

This independent auditor’s report is made solely to the shareholders as a body. Our audit work has been undertaken so

that we might state to the shareholders those matters we are required to state to them in the independent auditor’s

report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, we do not accept or assume responsibility to

anyone other than the shareholders as a body for our audit work, this independent auditor’s report, or any of the opinions

we have formed.

$

47
RURUBRUBRUBRUBRUICOICOCOOCNNN N LNNLIMIMIIITEDTEDTEAANNAD SD UBSSIDIDIIIIDAAARRIRARES

IIIIIInnnnnnddddeeppppppeeenndddeeeentt AAAAAuuuuudddiiitttooorrr’’’’’ssss RRRReeeepppoorrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrtttttttttttttttttttttttttttt

Responsibilities of the Directors for the Consolidated Financial Statements

The Directors, on behalf of the group, are responsible for:

— the preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated fi nancial statements in accordance with generally accepted

accounting practice in New Zealand (being New Zealand Equivalents to International Financial Reporting Standards) and

International Financial Reporting Standards;

— implementing necessary internal control to enable the preparation of a consolidated set of fi nancial statements that is fairly

presented and free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; and

— assessing the ability to continue as a going concern. This includes disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going

concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless they either intend to liquidate or to cease operations, or

have no realistic alternative but to do so.

Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Consolidated Financial Statements

Our objective is:

— to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated fi nancial statements as a whole are free from material

misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; and

— to issue an independent auditor’s report that includes our opinion.

Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with ISAs NZ

will always detect a material misstatement when it exists.

Misstatements can arise from fraud or error. They are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably

be expected to infl uence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these consolidated fi nancial statements.

A further description of our responsibilities for the audit of these consolidated fi nancial statements is located at

the External Reporting Board (XRB) website at:

http://www.xrb.govt.nz/standards-for-assurance-practitioners/auditors-responsibilities/audit-report-1/

This description forms part of our independent auditor’s report.

The engagement partner on the audit resulting in this independent auditor’s report is Paul Herrod.

For and on behalf of

KPMG Auckland

24 November 2017

© 2017 KPMG, a New Zealand partnership and a member fi rm of the KPMG network of independent

member fi rms affi liated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity.

48
CCorpppooorraattttttttteeeeeeeeeeeeeeee GGGGGGGGGGGGGGooooooooovveeeeerrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaannnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnccccccccccccccccceeeeeeeeeeeee

This section describes how Rubicon’s business practices refl ect corporate governance best practice.

This Annual Report was approved by the Board on 24 November 2017.

All references to $ is to US$ unless otherwise stated.

ETHICAL STANDARDS

Directors observe and foster high ethical standards.

Rubicon’s Code of Conduct and Ethics, Board Charter and other documents related to corporate governance, collectively and individually

encourage high standards of ethical and responsible behaviour.

Rubicon’s Code of Conduct and Ethics sets out clear expectations for ethical decision-making and personal behaviour by Directors and

employees in relation to situations where their or Rubicon’s integrity could be compromised. These include confl icts of interest, proper

use of Company property and information, fair dealings with employees and other stakeholders, compliance with laws and regulations,

reporting of unethical decision making and dishonest behaviour, and related matters.

Included in the Code of Conduct and Ethics are mechanisms for dealing with breaches of the Code. Rubicon’s Code of Conduct and Ethics

has been communicated to all Directors and employees of the Company, and is also published on our corporate website.

BOARD COMPOSITION AND PERFORMANCE

There is a balance of independence, skills, knowledge, experience, and perspectives among Directors that allows the Board

to work effectively.

The Board’s primary role and obligation is to protect and enhance the value of the assets of the Company and to act in the best interests

of the Company. The Board has statutory responsibility for the activities of the Company, which in practice is partially exercised through

delegation to the three Board standing committees (Audit, Remuneration and Nominations).

The Board Charter outlines a number of key roles and responsibilities of the Board, including:

• the review and approval of appropriate corporate strategies and objectives, transactions relating to acquisitions and divestments, capital

expenditures above delegated authority limits, fi nancial and capital structure policies, fi nancial statements and reports to shareholders;

• the review of performance against strategic objectives; and

• ensuring that appropriate systems and processes are in place so that the Group is managed in an honest, ethical, responsible and safe

manner.

The Board Charter is published on our corporate website.

The roles of Chairman and CEO are separate at Rubicon. The Chairman’s role is to foster a constructive corporate governance structure,

manage the Board effectively, provide leadership to the Board, chair shareholders meetings and to interface with the CEO.

The non-executive Director’s principal role is to provide independent judgement. This includes bringing outside experience and objectivity

on all issues which come before the Board, having a detailed knowledge of the Company’s business activities and on-going performance,

so they can make informed decisions.

49
CCCCCCCoooorrpppppoooorraattteeee GGooovvvvveeeeerrrrnnnnaaannnccceee

Board Composition

Rubicon’s Constitution requires a minimum of three Directors and provides for a maximum of nine.

As at 30 September 2017 the Directors of Rubicon were:

SG Kasnet (Chairman) HA Fletcher G Karaplis

(1)

DM Knott

(2)

WA Hasler

(1)

SL Moriarty R Tandon

1) On 31 October 2017, Rubicon announced that Messrs Karaplis and Hasler had indicated their intention to retire as Directors in

December 2017.

(2) In February 2017 Mr DM Knott appointed Mr DM Knott Jr by notice in writing as his alternate director, although he had actively

participated in Board meetings on an invitational basis from December 2016 until his formal appointment. The remaining Directors

unanimously approved Mr DM Knott Jr as Mr DM Knott’s alternate director.

Of Rubicon’s seven Directors, two are ordinarily resident in New Zealand. In addition the Board has identifi ed four of the Directors as being

Independent Directors.

As at 24 November 2017, the Independent Directors and non-Independent Directors of the Board were:

Independent Directors:

SG Kasnet (Chairman) HA Fletcher G Karaplis WA Hasler

Non-Independent Directors:

SL Moriarty

(1)

DM Knott

(2)

R Tandon

(2)

(1) Mr Moriarty is an Executive Director of the Company.

(2) Messrs Knott, Knott Jr and Tandon are Substantial Product Holders, as defi ned in the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013 in Rubicon shares.

At each Annual Shareholders’ Meeting (ASM), one-third of the total number of Directors must retire from offi ce by rotation. The Directors

who retire are those who have been in offi ce longest since last elected. In addition, all Directors appointed to the Board since the last ASM

must also stand for election.

The Company’s Board represents a balance of independence, skills, knowledge, experience and perspectives (refer Board biographies for

details), thereby ensuring the effectiveness of the Board in guiding the strategic direction of the Company and overseeing management.

Directors receive comprehensive information on the Company’s operations and have access to any additional information they consider

necessary for informed decision-making. Rubicon is committed to ensuring its Directors have the knowledge and information to discharge

their responsibilities effectively.

50
CCorpppoorraattttttttteeeeeeeeeeeeeeee GGGGGGGGGGGGGGooooooooovveeeerrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaannnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnccccccccccccccccceeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

BOARD COMMITTEES

The Board uses committees where this enhances its effectiveness in key areas while retaining Board responsibility.

The Board has three permanent committees, being the Audit Committee, the Remuneration Committee and the Nominations

Committee. Committees enhance the effectiveness of the Board through closer examination of issues and more effi cient decision

making. Rubicon’s committees assist the Board in the conduct of its responsibilities and report to the full Board on all material matters

and issues requiring Board decisions. All Board Directors receive copies of all Committee minutes and papers and can attend the

Committee meetings.

Each permanent committee has adopted a formal Charter addressing purpose, constitution and membership, authority, reporting

procedures and evaluation of the committee. These Charters are published on our corporate website.

Audit Committee Members:

R Tandon (Chairman) HA Fletcher WA Hasler SG Kasnet

The Audit Committee is comprised solely of non-executive Directors of the Company. It has been determined by the Board that

several members of the Audit Committee have an adequate accounting or fi nancial background as defi ned in the NZSX Listing Rules.

Although the Chairman is not an Independent Director, the majority of members are Independent Directors.

Further information on the Audit Committee is included under the following Reporting and Disclosure section.

Remuneration Committee Members:

DM Knott (Chairman) R Tandon SG Kasnet HA Fletcher

The Remuneration Committee is responsible for evaluating the performances of the CEO and senior executives of the Company,

setting the remuneration packages for senior executives, and recommending to the Board the remuneration of the CEO and

non-executive Directors.

Nominations Committee Members:

SG Kasnet (Chairman) HA Fletcher G Karaplis DM Knott

WA Hasler SL Moriarty R Tandon

The Nominations Committee comprises the full board, and is responsible for making recommendations of Director appointments. A

majority of the members of the Nominations Committee are Independent Directors.

In addition to the three permanent committees noted above, the Board establishes committees on an “as required” basis to address

specifi c issues that arise. The Board believes this enhances its effectiveness through closer scrutiny of specifi c issues. Currently there

are no such committees operating.

51
CCCCCCCoooorrpppppoooorraattteeee GGooovvvveeeeerrrrnnnnaaannnccceee

REPORTING AND DISCLOSURE

The Board demands integrity both in fi nancial reporting and in the timeliness of material disclosures of entity affairs.

The Board is ultimately responsible for ensuring the quality and integrity of the Company’s fi nancial reports. To achieve this, the Company

has in place a structure to independently verify and safeguard the integrity of the Group’s reporting. The Audit Committee constitutes a

key component of this structure.

The Audit Committee is well resourced and operates under a formal written Charter. The Audit Committee’s terms of reference include

the following duties and responsibilities:

• To review the effectiveness of the internal control framework across the Rubicon Group with management and the independent

Auditor;

• To review the Group’s accounting policies, fi nancial reporting practices, and auditing practices;

• To ensure that the Board is properly and regularly informed and updated on corporate fi nancial matters;

• To review all fi nancial statements of the Group and advise all Directors whether these fi nancial statements comply with the

appropriate laws and regulations;

• To confi rm the integrity of the Group’s fi nancial statements in terms of relevance, reliability, comparability and timeliness;

• To monitor and review the Group’s compliance with regulatory and statutory requirements and obligations;

• To maintain direct communication with the independent Auditor;

• To make recommendations to the Board as to the appointment and discharge of the independent Auditor and to ensure that

the independent Auditor or lead audit partner is changed at least every fi ve years;

• To pre-approve non-audit services; and

• To confi rm the independence of the independent Auditor.

In accordance with best practice the CEO is not a member of the Audit Committee.

DIRECTOR AND MANAGEMENT SHAREHOLDINGS, REMUNERATION

The remuneration of Directors and executives is transparent, fair, and reasonable.

Director and Senior Executives’ Equity Holdings

Rubicon believes it is appropriate to have Directors’ and executives’ remuneration aligned with the performance of the Company, and that

having Directors and executives own Rubicon shares is a good way of achieving this goal.

52
CCorpppoorraattttttttteeeeeeeeeeeeeeee GGGGGGGGGGGGGGooooooooovveeeerrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaannnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnccccccccccccccccceeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

At 24 November 2017, Directors and Senior Executives of the Company held the following relevant interests (as defi ned in the Financial

Markets Conduct Act 2013) in Rubicon shares:

Name Position Number of Shares

SG Kasnet Chairman and non-executive director 613,220

DM Knott / DM Knott Jr Non-executive director 137,663,111

R Tandon Non-executive director 86,108,419

HA Fletcher Non-executive director 5,775,286

WA Hasler Non-executive director 823,804

SL Moriarty Director and Chief Executive Offi cer 3,495,476

MA Taylor CFO and Company Secretary 1,093,234

BG Burton Vice President 633,460

S Ludher-Chandra Vice President 149,420

The Company’s remuneration policies aim to attract and retain talented and motivated Directors and executives who will contribute to

enhancing the performance of the Company.

Non-Executive Director Remuneration

The Company’s remuneration policy for Directors is to remunerate Directors at levels that are fair and reasonable in a competitive market

environment taking into account the skills, knowledge and experience required by the Company.

The remuneration paid, prior to any taxation liability, to non-executive Directors of Rubicon during the 15 months ended 30 September 2017 was:

NZ$ Base Remuneration Base Remuneration Payment of Total

Year to 30 June 2017 Three months to deferred 2013 TSR

30 September 2017 incentive plan

(2)

SG Kasnet (Chairman) $151,375 $37,844 $36,750 $225,969

HA Fletcher

(1)

$94,000 $23,400 $22,875 $140,275

WA Hasler $86,500 $21,625 $21,000 $129,125

G Karaplis $86,500 $21,625 $21,000 $129,125

DM Knott $86,500 $21,625 $21,000 $129,125


(1) The additional base remuneration of NZ$7,500 per annum refl ects the additional workload undertaken by Mr Fletcher as Chair of

both the Audit and Due Diligence Committees during the recent transactional period of the Company.

(2) The Company’s CEO, who is also an Executive Director, received NZ$140,500 in respect of this Plan, but received no directors fees.

The CEO’s other remuneration payment details are shown below.

Non-executive Directors are not entitled to receive retirement payments.

Following the sale of the Tenon distribution business, and the winding down and (soon) liquidation of that company, the Rubicon Board

agreed to reduce Rubicon Directors fees from 1 November 2017 to NZ$95,000 per annum for the Chairman and NZ$62,500 for each

non-executive director, which will reduce annual fees paid to directors by NZ$184,000. The CEO does not receive Rubicon Director fees.

53
CCCCCCCoooorrpppppoooorraattteeee GGooovvvveeeeerrrrnnnnaaannnccceee

Executive Director and Employee Remuneration

Rubicon’s remuneration policy aims to attract, retain and incentivise employees in order to drive and enhance Company performance.

Annual performance incentive payments are determined by the Remuneration Committee (and in the case of the CEO, approved by the

Board), and are calculated by measuring actual performance outputs against target individual and/or Company objectives.

In accordance with Section 211 of the Companies Act, remuneration and other benefi ts (including performance benefi ts and redundancy

payments) which in total exceeded NZ$100,000 per annum received by employees of Rubicon and its subsidiaries (i.e. including Tenon

and ArborGen and their respective subsidiaries) in the 15-month period ended 30 September 2017 is summarised in the following table:

NZ$000 Number of

Employees

$100 to $110 16

$110 to $120 11

$120 to $130 12

$130 to $140 5

$140 to $150 3

$150 to $160 4

$160 to $170 2

$170 to $180 1

$180 to $190 1

$190 to $200 2

$200 to $210 2

$220 to $230 2

$230 to $240 1

$240 to $250 2

$250 to $260 2

$260 to $270 1

$270 to $280 1

$280 to $290 1

$290 to $300 1

$320 to $330 1

$380 to $390 1

$510 to $520 1

$540 to $550 1

$650 to $660 1

$1,000 to $1,010 2

$1,400 to $1,410 1

$1,500 to $1,510 1

$2,050 to $2,060 1

54
CCorpppoorraattttttttteeeeeeeeeeeeeeee GGGGGGGGGGGGGGooooooooovveeeerrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaannnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnccccccccccccccccceeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

Several points need to be made in respect of this table:

• It is a consolidation of data for all employees of Tenon (and its subsidiaries), TCLP (and its subsidiary) ArborGen (and its subsidiaries),

and Rubicon.

• As Rubicon has only four employees in the table, the data is dominated by Tenon and ArborGen employees.

• It is for a 15-month period.

• The table refl ects the period during which the listed entity Tenon Limited is being wound-down and liquidated.

• The table also captures data for the period during which Tenon’s US distribution and Clearwood businesses were each sold, and hence

includes all related incentive, retention and severance payments made to Tenon senior executives during the period.

• The top fi ve payments all relate to executives of Tenon Limited who received severance and incentive payments upon the sale of those

businesses and wind down of the listed Tenon entity.

The base annual salary paid to the Rubicon CEO is NZ$578,000, (or NZ$722,500 for the 15-month period). He also received a retention

payment in March 2017 of NZ$71,834. He did not receive any annual performance incentive payments during the 15-months ended 30

September 2017 or during the year ended 30 June 2016, and nor did he receive any Director fees for his services as a Director of Rubicon,

or for his chairmanship of Tenon Limited, or for his directorship of ArborGen Inc. The public company director fees relating to him serving

as chairman of Tenon were paid directly to Rubicon for Rubicon’s account, however he was awarded a NZ$100,000 payment by the

independent directors of Tenon Limited, as partial recognition of his considerable efforts in successfully leading and concluding the Tenon

sales process over a two-year period.

Rubicon is committed to providing equal employment opportunities and ensures its selection processes for recruitment and employee

development opportunities are free from bias and are based on merit. The Company also has a fl exible working programme that permits

work/life balance.

As at 30 September 2017, six of the Rubicon Group’s senior executives were female, including the SVP of Performance Improvement

(Rubicon), the Financial Controller (Tenon), the General Manager – Brazil (ArborGen), Human Resources Manager (ArborGen), Director

Financial Planning (ArborGen), and Commercial Manager (TCLP).

The following table shows the split for Rubicon Limited only:

2017 2016

Women Men Women Men

Board of Directors 7 6

Senior Executives 1 2 2

RISK MANAGEMENT

The Board regularly verifi es that Rubicon has appropriate processes that identify and manage potential and relevant risks.

The Audit Committee reviews with management and the independent Auditor signifi cant risks and exposures of the Group, and assesses

risk mitigation steps taken by management to minimise such risks.

55
CCCCCCCoooorrpppppoooorraattteeee GGooovvvvveeeeerrrrnnnnaaannncccceee

AUDITORS

The Board ensures the quality and independence of the external audit process.

The Company’s external Auditor is KPMG. Consistent with best practice the audit partner is rotated at no greater than fi ve yearly intervals.

A formal engagement letter with KPMG clearly sets out the responsibilities of KPMG in relation to the external audit of the Group’s

fi nancial statements and fi nancial systems. The Board facilitates full and frank communication between the Audit Committee, KPMG

and management. KPMG attends all Audit Committee meetings and has sessions, at least semi-annually, with the Audit Committee with

management not in attendance.

The Audit Committee is satisfi ed that the independence of KPMG is not compromised by any relationship between KPMG and Rubicon

or any related party or as a result of any non-audit services provided by KPMG, and has obtained confi rmation from KPMG to this effect.

The Audit Committee, together with the Company’s management, monitor the performance of KPMG to ensure that the services being

provided to the Company are of the highest standard, relevant, timely and cost effective.

SHAREHOLDER RELATIONS

The Board fosters constructive relationships with shareholders that encourage them to engage with the Company.

The Board is committed to promoting good relations between Rubicon and its shareholders through:

• communicating effectively with them;

• giving them ready access to information about the Company, its goals, strategies and performance; and

• facilitating participation at shareholder meetings, by rotating the location annually.

The Company’s website includes the following information:

• Annual and Interim Reports;

• Disclosures made to the stock exchange;

• Press releases; and

• Key corporate governance documents.

STAKEHOLDER INTERESTS

The Board respects the interests of stakeholders within the context of the Company’s ownership type and its fundamental

purpose.

Rubicon is strongly committed to meeting its legal and other obligations to stakeholders such as employees, shareholders, and suppliers.

The corporate governance principles followed by Rubicon do not materially differ from the Corporate Governance Best Practice Code

issued by NZX and Corporate Governance Principles and Guidelines issued by the Financial Markets Authority, other than the Chairman

of the Audit Committee is not an Independent Director.

56
CCorpppooorraattttttttteeeeeeeeeeeeeeee GGGGGGGGGGGGGGooooooooovveeeeerrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaannnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnccccccccccccccccceeeeeeeeeeeee

RUBICON INTERESTS REGISTER

Directors’ certifi cates to cover entries in the Interests Register made during the 15 month period in respect of remuneration, dealing in the

Company’s securities, insurance and other interests have been disclosed as required by the New Zealand Companies Act 1993.

Directors’ Interests

The following are particulars of general disclosures of interest given by the Directors of the Company pursuant to section 140(2) of the

Companies Act 1993:

Relationship

SG Kasnet

Governors Academy Trustee

Calypso Management LLC CEO

Tenon Limited Chairman

Ocean Manchester Corporation President

The Kasnet Family Foundation Trustee

First Ipswich Bank Director

Two Harbors Investment Corp Lead Director and Chair of Audit Committee

Stephen G Kasnet 2012 Grantor Retained Annuity Trust Trustee and benefi ciary

Goodbulk Limited Director

Granite Point Mortgage Trust Lead Director and Chair of Audit Committee

ArborGen Inc Director

HA Fletcher

Asia Pacifi c Committee of the Trilateral Commission Member

IAG (New Zealand) Holdings Limited Chairman

IAG (New Zealand) Limited Chairman

The University of Auckland Foundation Trustee

Dilworth Trust Trustee

Insurance Australia Group Limited Director

The New Zealand Portrait Gallery Trustee

Fletcher Brothers Limited Chairman

The Fletcher Trust Trustee

Advisory Committee of the Knox Investment Partners Fund IV Member

Harper Pass Limited Chairman / Shareholder

DM Knott

Knott Partners, LP Co-CEO, Co-Chief Investment Manager

and Co-Managing Partner

DM Knott Jr

Knott Partners, LP Co-CEO, Co-Chief Investment Manager

and Co-Managing Partner

The HiGro Group, LLC Advisory Board

57
CCCCCCCoooorrpppppoooorraattteeee GGooovvvveeeeerrrrnnnnaaannnccceee

Relationship

R Tandon

Libra Advisors LLC Founder and Managing Member

Vostok Emerging Finance Ltd Director

NYU Tandon Engineering School Director

Carl Schurz Park Conservancy Director

SL Moriarty

ArborGen Inc Director

Moriarty Family Trust Trustee and benefi ciary

Moriarty Superannuation Fund Trustee and sole benefi ciary

WA Hasler

(1)

GlobalStar Inc Director

ETwater Inc Director

Ataraxis Director

Haas School of Business at UC Berkeley Director

(1) Mr Hasler has indicated his intention to retire from the Board in December 2017.

During the 15 month period ended 30 September 2017 Directors advised the following appointments / interests:

Relationship

SG Kasnet

Goodbulk Limited Director

ArborGen Inc Director

DM Knott Jr

Knott Partners, LP Co-CEO, Co-Chief Investment Manager

and Co-Managing Partner

The HiGro Group, LLC Advisory Board

R Tandon

Libra Advisors LLC Founder and Managing Member

Vostok Emerging Finance Ltd Director

NYU Tandon Engineering School Director

Carl Schurz Park Conservancy Director

58
CCorppppoorraattttttttteeeeeeeeeeeeeeee GGGGGGGGGGGGooooooooovvveeeeerrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaannnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnncccccccccccccccccceeeeeeeeeeeee

During the 15 month period ended 30 September 2017 Directors advised the following resignations:

Relationship

HA Fletcher

Vector Limited Director

Advisory Board of Gravida National Centre for Growth and Development Member

DM Knott

Paramount Resources Director

Boy’s and Girl’s Harbor Director

Say Yes to Education Director

Undergraduate Financial Aid at the University of Pennsylvania Director

SL Moriarty

Tenon Limited Chairman

G Karaplis

(1)

Tenon Limited Director

(1) Mr Karaplis has indicated his intention to retire from the Board in December 2017

Subsequent to 30 September 2017 Directors advised the following appointments:

Relationship

SG Kasnet

Granite Point Mortgage Trust Lead Director and Chair of Audit Committee

Subsequent to 30 September 2017 Directors advised the following resignations:

Relationship

SG Kasnet

Silver Bay Realty Trust Corp Director and Chair of Audit Committee

WA Hasler

Aviat Networks Director

Inside Track, Inc Director

Dealings in Company Securities

Directors and Offi cers have disclosed that they sold and acquired the following relevant interests in Rubicon shares since 1 July 2016:

Number of Consideration

shares paid

sold NZ$

SG Kasnet 40,045 $0

(1)

(1) Mr Kasnet transferred these shares to his two adult children

59
CCCCCCCoooorrpppppoooorraattteeee GGooovvvveeeeerrrrnnnnaaannnccceee

Number of Consideration

shares paid

acquired NZ$

DM Knott and DM Knott Jr - Knott Partners 22,079,949

(1)

$4,809,013

R Tandon – Libra Fund LP 56,777,016

(1)

$12,366,034

(1) Shares placed in order to strengthen Rubicon’s fi nancial position following the acquisition of ArborGen shares on 28 June 2017 to

take Rubicon to 100% of the issued shares in ArborGen.

Directors’ and Offi cers’ Indemnity and Insurance

In accordance with section 162 of the Companies Act 1993 and the constitution of the Company, the Company has given indemnities to,

and has effected insurance for, Directors and executives of Rubicon and its related companies which indemnify and insure Directors and

executives against monetary losses as a result of actions or omissions by them in the course of their duties. The Company has undertaken

to maintain insurance cover for the Directors and executives for a period of seven years following the date the Director or executive has

ceased to be a Director or executive of the Company. Excluded from the indemnity are actions of criminal liability or breach of the Director’s

duty to act in what they believe to be the best interests of the Company.

On 1 July 2017, the Company renewed its Directors’ and Offi cers’ liability and statutory liability insurance policies.

Donations

During the 15 month period ended 30 September 2017 the total amount of donations made by Rubicon and its subsidiaries was $1,680,

which were all made by Tenon.

Credit Rating

Rubicon has not sought a credit rating.

TENON INTERESTS REGISTER

Section 211(2) of the Companies Act 1993 requires details of entries in the interests register of subsidiaries to be included in the annual

report. The following are entries made to the Tenon interests register during the 15 month period ended 30 September 2017.

Directors’ Interests

Tenon directors have advised the following changes in their interests:

Relationship

SG Kasnet

As per Rubicon entries listed above.

SB Walker

Wood Engineering Technology Limited Initial disclosure – Director

Walker Capital Management Limited Initial disclosure – Managing Director

Grafton Downs Limited Appointed Director

MK Eglinton

BBC Technologies Limited Appointed Chairman

Snapper Rock Limited Appointed Chairman

60
CCorpppoorraattttttttteeeeeeeeeeeeeeee GGGGGGGGGGGGGGooooooooovveeeerrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaannnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnccccccccccccccccceeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

Tenon Directors’ Remuneration

The aggregate amount of director fees paid by Tenon to non-executive directors for services in their capacity as directors during the 15

month ended 30 September 2017 was NZ$515,958.

Directors fees, prior to any taxation liability, paid to individual non-executive directors in the 15 months ended 30 September 2017 were:

NZ$ Total

MK Eglinton $113,958

RH Fisher $49,500

G Karaplis $70,417

SG Kasnet (Chairman from 28 April 2017) $100,625

SB Walker $67,708

Fees paid by Tenon in relation to services provided the Rubicon CEO in his role as Tenon’s Chairman of NZ$113,750 were paid directly to

Rubicon for Rubicon’s account. Please also see disclosure below.

SUBSIDIARY COMPANY DIRECTORS

Section 211(2) of the Companies Act 1993 requires the Company to disclose in relation to directors and former directors of its subsidiaries,

amongst other things, the total remuneration and value of other benefi ts received by them, and particulars of interest register entries made

by them during the 15 month period ended 30 September 2017. No employee of a Rubicon Group company appointed as a director of any

wholly-owned Rubicon subsidiary receives any remuneration or other benefi ts in that role. The remuneration and other benefi ts of employees

are disclosed elsewhere in this Annual Report. Other than in respect of the separately NZX listed Tenon Limited, no director of any Rubicon

subsidiary receives any remuneration or other benefi ts as a director. The following persons held offi ce as directors of subsidiary companies as

at 24 November 2017, or in the case of those persons with the letter (R) after their name, ceased to hold offi ce during the period.

Rubicon Forests Holdings Limited SL Moriarty, MA Taylor

Rubicon Industries USA LLC SG Kasnet, HA Fletcher, DM Knott, DM Knott Jr, SL Moriarty, R Tandon, WA Hasler, G Karaplis

Rubicon Clearwood GP Limited SL Moriarty, MA Taylor, AJ Brown

Rubicon Clearwood Holdings Limited SL Moriarty, MA Taylor, AJ Brown

Tenon Limited MK Eglinton (NZ$113,958), RG Fisher (NZ$49,500), SG Kasnet (NZ$100,625), G Karaplis

(NZ$70,417), SB Walker (NZ$67,708), SL Moriarty (NZ$100,000), Rubicon Limited ($113,750)

(1)

Tenon Holdings Limited PM Gillard, JE Paice, AS White (R), AT Johnston (R)

Tenon Industries Limited PM Gillard, JE Paice, AS White (R), AT Johnston (R)

Tenon Manufacturing Limited PM Gillard, JE Paice, AS White (R), AT Johnston (R)

Tenon Retirement Plan Nominees Limited PM Gillard, JE Paice, AS White (R), AT Johnston (R)

Tenon Custodians Limited PM Gillard, JE Paice, AS White (R), AT Johnston (R)

CNI Forest Nominees Limited PM Gillard, JE Paice, AS White (R), AT Johnston (R)

Fletcher Challenge Forests Finance Limited PM Gillard, JE Paice, AS White (R), AT Johnston (R)

Fletcher Challenge Limited PM Gillard, JE Paice, AS White (R), AT Johnston (R)

Forest Corporation of New Zealand Limited PM Gillard

Kaingaroa Holdings Limited PM Gillard

ArborGen Inc SL Moriarty, AM Baum, SG Kasnet

ArborGen Comercio de Produtos Florestais

Importacao e Exportacao LTDA G Bassa

ArborGen Technologia Florestal LTDA G Bassa

61
CCCCCCCoooorrpppppoooorraattteeee GGooovvvvveeeeerrrrnnnnaaannnccceee

ArborGen New Zealand Holdings, LLC AM Baum

ArborGen New Zealand Unlimited AM Baum, G Mann

ArborGen Australia Holdings Pty Ltd AM Baum, G Mann, A Frees

ArborGen Australia Pty Ltd AM Baum, G Mann, A Frees

(1) Fees paid by Tenon in relation to services provided the Rubicon CEO in his role as Tenon’s Chairman of NZ$113,750 were paid directly

to Rubicon for Rubicon’s account.

SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION

The Company’s shares are listed on the Main Board of NZX Limited. The 20 shareholders of record with the largest holdings of shares

at 31 October 2017 were:

Name Number of shares % of shares

New Zealand Central Securities Depository Limited 394,677,766 80.89

Fletcher Brothers Limited 5,649,731 1.16

Zeta Beta Limited 3,408,000 0.70

Custodial Services Limited 3,133,164 0.64

Sky Hill Limited 3,078,000 0.63

Moriarty Superannuation Fund – SL & DE Moriarty 2,710,124 0.55

The So Proud a/c – S Godfrey, D Toothill & M Godfrey 2,455,527 0.50

The Chiam Family a/c – Sok Eng Boey, Yeow Ann Chiam, Kay Hong Chiam & Shen Mei Chiam 2,241,937 0.46

P Bradfi eld 1,744,300 0.36

Y Wang 1,621,530 0.33

C Flood 1,500,000 0.31

F Pearson & S Pearson (The Tai Shan Foundation) 1,490,400 0.31

G Simms 1,400,000 0.29

Wallace Family a/c – S Wallace & Sievwrights Trustee Services (No.4) Limited 1,250,000 0.26

Taylor Superannuation Fund – M & L Taylor 1,093,234 0.22

B Tyler 1,003,333 0.21

Leveraged Equities Finance Limited 914,736 0.19

P Wheeler 855,363 0.17

W Hasler 823,804 0.17

Chin-Yi Lin and Yu-Ching Lin-Chao 800,000 0.16

Total 431,850,949 88.51

New Zealand Central Securities Depository Limited provides a custodial depository service, which allows electronic trading of securities to

its members, and does not have a benefi cial interest in these shares. Its holders of Rubicon shares at 31 October 2017 were:

Name Number of shares % of shares

HSBC Nominees (New Zealand) Limited 222,882,712 45.68

Citibank Nominees (New Zealand) Limited 109,230,158 22.39

JPMorgan Chase Bank NA NZ Branch - Segregated Clients 46,904,036 9.61

Accident Compensation Corporation 12,371,000 2.54

National Nominees New Zealand Limited 2,657,891 0.54

BNP Paribas Nominees (NZ) Limited 622,047 0.13

HSBC Nominees (New Zealand) Limited A/C State Street 9,922 0.00

Total 394,677,766 80.89

62
CCorpppooorraattttttttteeeeeeeeeeeeeeee GGGGGGGGGGGGGGooooooooovveeeeerrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaannnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnccccccccccccccccceeeeeeeeeeeee

DISTRIBUTION OF SHAREHOLDERS AND HOLDINGS AS AT 31 OCTOBER 2017

Number of shareholders Number of shares

Size of holding Number % Number %

1–999 1,988 32.12 1,330,418 0.27

1,000–9,999 3,482 56.26 9,279,204 1.90

10,000–49,999 476 7.69 9,730,623 2.00

50,000–99,999 100 1.62 6,642,704 1.36

100,000 and over 143 2.31 460,925,394 94.47

Total 6,189 100.00 487,908,343 100.00

DOMICILE OF SHAREHOLDERS AND HOLDINGS AS AT 31 OCTOBER 2017

Number of shareholders Number of shares

Number % Number %

New Zealand 5,158 83.34 474,206,921 97.19

Australia 641 10.36 1,960,787 0.40

United Kingdom 147 2.37 352,434 0.07

United States of America 138 2.23 2,126,667 0.44

Other 105 1.70 9,261,534 1.90

Total 6,189 100.00 487,908,343 100.00

SUBSTANTIAL PRODUCT HOLDERS

According to notices that have been provided under the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013, as at 24 November 2017 the following were

substantial product holders in the Company. In terms of the Act, the number of shares and percentages shown below are as last advised

by the substantial product holder and may not be their current holdings.

Substantial security holder Number of % of issued Date of notice

voting securities Rubicon securities

David Knott

(a)

115,583,162 28.256 23 August 2016

(2)

Libra Fund LP / Ranjan Tandon 86,108,419 17.648 3 July 2017

(1)

Third Avenue Management LLC 44,091,741 9.036 10 July 2017

(1)

Perry Corporation / Richard Perry 39,337,307 8.062 26 October 2017

(1)

Sandell Asset Management Corp

(b)

34,502,835 7.072 26 September 2017

(1)

JP Morgan Clearing Corp

(c)

29,338,903 7.172 19 July 2016

(2)

63
CCCCCCCoooorrpppppoooorraattteeee GGooovvvveeeerrrrnnnnaannccceee

The following substantial product holder notices have been received (which are included in the substantial product holder notices

disclosed above);

Substantial security holder Number of % of issued Date of notice

voting securities Rubicon securities

(a) Mr Knott has disclosed he holds a relevant interest in Rubicon shares held by:

Dorset Management Corporation 105,679,657 25.835 23 August 2016

(2)

Knott Partners L.P.

(i)

82,511,226 20.171 13 June 2014

(2)

(i) Dorset Management Corporation has entered into an investment management agreement with Knott Partners, L.P. pursuant

to which Dorset Management Corporation has discretion over the acquisition, disposition and voting of the securities held by

Knott Partners, L.P. David M Knott is the sole shareholder, Co-Director and Co-President of Dorset Management Corporation.

David M Knott Jr is a Co-Director and Co-President of Dorset Management Corporation.

(b) Castlerigg Master Investments, Ltd has disclosed it has a benefi cial interest in the following shares for which Sandell Asset

Management Corp. has the power to control the disposition of and voting for:

34,502,835 7.072 26 September 2017

(1)

(c) In their substantial security notice JP Morgan Clearing Corp. stated that the nature of their relevant interest was as a “Prime broker

with a conditional power to acquire or dispose of shares under the terms of a Prime Brokerage Agreement”.

The total number of issued voting securities at 24 November 2017 was 487,908,343. All of the references to voting securities in this

section are to the Company’s ordinary shares.

(1) Shares on issue at date substantial product holder notice was received was 487,908,343

(2) Shares on issue at date substantial product holder notice was received was 409,051,378

NZX WAIVERS

No waivers were granted to the Company by NZX under the NZSX Listing Rules during the period from 1 July 2016 to 24 November 2017.

64
BBoarrrddddddd oofff DDDDDiirrrrrrrrrrrrreeeeeeeeeeccttooooooooorrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrsssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss

STEPHEN KASNET

Director and Chairman

BA University of Pennsylvania (Philadelphia)

Steve is CEO of Calypso Management LLC, Trustee of Governors

Academy, President of Ocean Manchester Corporation, Chairman

of Tenon Limited, and a Director of ArborGen Inc, First Ipswich

Bank, Two Harbors Investment Corp, Goodbulk Limited, and

Granite Point Mortgage Trust.

He is a former President and CEO of Raymond Property Company

and Dartmouth Street Capital, which are real estate companies

engaged in the acquisition, development, renovation, ownership

and management of residential and commercial real estate in the

Boston area. Prior to this he was President and CEO of Harbor

Global Company Limited, which maintained the largest real estate

investment fund in Russia and owned and managed one of Russia’s

leading asset management and mutual fund complexes.

HUGH FLETCHER

Director

MBA Stanford University; MCom (Hons) and BSc University of Auckland

Hugh is Chairman of IAG (New Zealand) Holdings Limited, IAG

(New Zealand) Limited and Fletcher Brothers Limited, and a Director

of Insurance Australia Group Limited.

He is also a Trustee of The University of Auckland Foundation,

the Dilworth Trust, The Fletcher Trust, JMC Fletcher Family Trust

and The New Zealand Portrait Gallery, and a member of the Asia

Pacifi c Committee of the Trilateral Commission, and the Advisory

Committee of the Knox Investment Partners Fund IV.

Hugh has broad pastoral farming interests. His executive

experience includes six years as Managing Director and Chief

Operating Officer of Fletcher Challenge Limited, before he

became CEO from 1987–1997.


BILL HASLER

Director

MBA Harvard; BA Pomona College (California), CPA

Bill is former Vice Chairman and Board Director of KPMG Peat

Marwick, a position he held from 1984–1991 after being

responsible for KPMG’s western US operations from 1984–1986,

and subsequently heading their worldwide management consulting

practice from 1986–1991.

Upon leaving KPMG, Bill became Dean and Departmental Chair

of the Haas School of Business at the University of California in

Berkeley. He held this position from 1991–1998, and continues

today as Dean Emeritus.

In addition, Bill is a Director of Globalstar Inc, Ataraxis, ETwater

Inc and the Haas School of Business at UC Berkeley. He is also a

consultant to, and investor in several private technology companies.


GEORGE KARAPLIS

Director

BEng and MBA McGill University

George has over 35 years’ experience building and growing

shareholder value and has a proven track record in high growth

companies.

He has previously led France Telecom’s Global One business in

Greece as Managing Director and was Deputy Chairman of Netia,

a Polish integrated telecom services and media solutions’ company.

He also acted as Chief Financial Offi cer and General Manager of

International Investments for the Hellenic Telecommunications

Organisation.

Prior to that George held a number of management positions in

Canada and Europe. He has relevant experience in the forestry and

wood products industry including with Domtar, a Canadian Paper

and Forest Product producer.

65
DAVID KNOTT

Director

BA University of Pennsylvania; MBA Wharton School of the

University of Pennsylvania

David is the Co-Chief Executive Officer, Co-Chief Investment

Manager and Co-Managing Partner of Knott Partners who, with

associated entities, is Rubicon’s largest shareholder. He has served

as Chief Investment Manager of Knott Partners since 1987, and

prior to this he was a General Partner and analyst at Mandrakos

Associates.

DAVID KNOTT Jr

Alternate Director

BA University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

David is the Co-Chief Executive Offi cer, Co-Chief Investment

Manager and Co-Managing Partner of Knott Partners who, with

associated entities, is Rubicon’s largest shareholder. He has served

as Co-Chief Investment Manager of Knott Partners since March

2017. David is on the Advisory Board of The HiGro Group, LLC.

LUKE MORIARTY

Chief Executive Offi cer and Director

MS Stanford University; LLB (Hons) and BCA Victoria University

Luke has a strong background in business and commercial transactions,

both in New Zealand and North America. His fi nancial experience

has included extensive international business valuation, acquisition,

divestment and joint venture analysis and negotiation, and structuring

and execution in multi-billion dollar transactions – ranging from minority

buyouts to trade sales and IPOs.

He joined the Fletcher Challenge Executive Offi ce in 1999, and in 2000

was instrumental in the structuring of the fi nancial separation of the

Fletcher Challenge Group, including the establishment of Tenon (then

Fletcher Challenge Forests) and the formation of Rubicon in 2001.

Luke is a Director and the CEO of Rubicon and a Director of ArborGen

Inc. He was previously (2012 – 2016) a Monetary Policy Advisor to the

Governor of the Reserve Bank of New Zealand, and the Chairman of

Tenon Limited.

RANJAN TANDON

Director

MBA Harvard Business School; B Tech Indian Institute of Technology

Ranjan is Founder and Managing Member of Libra Advisors LLC

(Libra), which holds a 17.6% interest in Rubicon. Libra had assets of

$2.5 billion and invested in domestic and emerging market equities

prior to conversion to a family offi ce in 2012. He previously served

as Sr Management Trainee with DCM in India, CFO of an LBO,

InterMarine Incorporated, Houston and as a VP with Merrill Lynch

prior to establishing Libra in 1990.

Ranjan is also a Board Member of the NYU Tandon Engineering

School, the Carl Schurz Park Conservancy and has endowed Faculty

Chairs at the Harvard Business School and Yale University. He is

also a Director of a listed Stockholm Company, Vostok Emerging

Finance, which invests in early and growth stage fi ntech companies

across emerging markets.

BBBBBBBoooooaarrrrrddddd oofff DDDDirreeeccctttttoooooorrsss

Investor Information
INVESTOR ENQUIRIES/REGISTERED OFFICE

Level 1, 136 Customs Street West, Auckland

PO Box 68 249, Wellesley St,

Auckland 1141, New Zealand

Telephone: 64 9 356 9800

Facsimile: 64 9 356 9801

Email: information@rubicon-nz.com

Website: www.rubicon-nz.com

STOCK EXCHANGE LISTING

The Company’s shares (RBC) are listed on the NZSX.

SHAREHOLDER ENQUIRIES

Shareholders with enquiries about share transactions or

changes of address should contact the Share Registrar:

Computershare Investor Services Limited

Level 2, 159 Hurstmere Road

Takapuna, Auckland

Private Bag 92 119,

Auckland 1142, New Zealand

Telephone: 64 9 488 8777

Facsimile: 64 9 488 8787

Email: enquiry@computershare.co.nz

ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS

You can elect to receive your shareholder communications

electronically.

To register, visit www.investorcentre.com/nz. To initially access

this website, you will need your CSN or Holder Number and

FIN. You will be guided through a series of steps to register

your account, including setting up a new user ID and password

for on-going use of the website.

Once logged in, click on “My Profi le”. In the Communication

preferences panel, click “update”.

Alternatively send your name, address and CSN or holder

number to ecomms@computershare.co.nz advising you wish

to receive your Rubicon shareholder communications by email.

---

14 December 2017
Notice is hereby given that a

Meeting of Rubicon Limited shareholders

will be held at the Rydges Latimer,

30 Latimer Square, Christchurch

at 10.00am on 12 January 2018

Rubicon Meeting

of Shareholders

Notice of Meeting

Rubicon Limited Meeting
IMPORTANT INFORMATION

This document includes the following information:

• a letter from the Independent Directors of Rubicon Limited;

• a summary of the Proposed Transaction: the proposed sale by Rubicon TC Holdings LP of its 44.88% interest in the Tenon

Clearwood Limited Partnership (TCLP), for which shareholder approval is being sought at the Meeting;

• a description of the business of the Meeting;

• a detailed explanation of the Proposed Transaction; and

• an independent report prepared by Grant Samuel & Associates Limited in relation to the Proposed Transaction.

VOTING/PROXY FORM

Accompanying this document is the Voting/Proxy Form, to enable shareholders to vote on the resolutions by:

• attending the Meeting; or

• lodging a postal vote; or

• appointing a proxy to vote on their behalf at the Meeting.

IMPORTANT DATES

All times are given in New Zealand time.

5.00pm, 5 January 2018Record date for determination of voting entitlements for the Meeting

10.00am, 10 January 2018Latest time for receipt by Rubicon Limited of postal votes and proxies

5.00pm, 10 January 2018Final Purchase Price Per Share advised, following calculation of TCLP net debt

at 31 December 2017

10.00am, 12 January 2018Meeting

10.00am, 31 January 2018Closing of the Proposed Transaction

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

There are statements in this Report that are ‘forward looking statements.’ As these forward-looking statements are predictive in nature, they are

subject to a number of risks and uncertainties relating to Rubicon, and our Tenon Clearwood Limited Partnership (TCLP) and ArborGen investments,

many of which are beyond our control. As a result, actual results and conditions may differ materially from those expressed or implied by such

statements.

In particular, TCLP’s operations and results are significantly influenced by the level of activity in the various sectors of the economies in which it

operates (particularly Australasia, Europe, and North America). Fluctuations in industrial output, commercial and residential construction activity,

capital availability, housing turnover and pricing, levels of repairs, remodelling and additions to existing homes, new housing starts, relative exchange

rates (particularly the NZ dollar, the Euro, and the US dollar), interest rates, and profitability of customers, can each have a substantial impact on

TCLP’s results of operations and financial condition. Other risks include competitor product development, product demand and pricing, input costs, log

availability, and customer concentration risk.

ArborGen’s risks and uncertainties include (in addition to those noted above in relation to TCLP) - the global markets and geographies in which it

operates (particularly South America, North America, and Australasia), intellectual property protection, regulatory approvals, public and

customer acceptance of genetically engineered products, the rate of customer adoption of advanced seedling products, the success of ArborGen’s

research and development activities, weather conditions, cone and seed inventory, biological matters, and the fact that ArborGen’s annual crops and

seed orchards are not the subject of insurance cover.

As a result of the foregoing, actual results and conclusions may differ materially from those expressed or implied by such statements.

All references in this document to currencies are as stated – i.e. US$, NZ$ and Euro.

1
Letter from Independent Directors

Dear Shareholder

We are pleased to invite you to attend a Meeting of Shareholders of Rubicon Limited (Rubicon), which will be held at the Rydges

Latimer, 30 Latimer Square, Christchurch, commencing at 10.00am on 12 January 2018 (New Zealand time). Enclosed is the Notice

of Meeting which outlines the business to be conducted. If you are unable to attend the Meeting, you are encouraged to complete

and lodge your Voting/Proxy Form (either by post or by fax) so that it reaches the registered office of the Company, or the office of

the Share Registry, no later than 10.00am on 10 January 2018 (New Zealand time).

At the Meeting, the resolution shareholders will be given the opportunity to vote on relates to the proposed Sale of Rubicon’s

44.88% shareholding interest in TCLP (the Proposed Transaction), the vehicle that now owns the previous Tenon clearwood

operation. This investment is owned by Rubicon’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Rubicon TC Holdings LP (Vendor).

The proposed Purchasers of Rubicon’s TCLP interest are –

• Dorset Management Corporation (an affiliate of Knott Partners LP) (Knott), as to 20.0%

• Libra Partners NZ, LLC (an affiliate of Libra Fund LP) (Libra), as to 20.0%

• Existing TCLP Limited Partners as to 4.88%

Under the governing TCLP Partnership Agreement (LPA), existing Limited Partners have pre-emptive rights should Partners wish

to sell down their ownership interests. All existing Partners have formally agreed to waive their pre-emptive rights over the 40.0%

(combined) that is to be sold to Knott and Libra, and will participate (or not) according to their pre-emptive rights over the 4.88%

balance of Rubicon’s shareholding interest. We believe the 4.88% will be fully acquired by existing TCLP Partners.

The negotiated Purchase Price for the Sale is US$14.2 million (the cost of Rubicon’s investment in TCLP made earlier this year) plus

Rubicon’s share of the reduction in TCLP’s Net Debt in the period from 28 April 2017 (the date of Rubicon’s investment into TCLP)

through to 31 December 2017. As this latter amount will not be known until 10 January 2018, the final Purchase Price can only be

estimated at this stage, but it is expected to be circa US$15.3 million (net of US$0.7 million dividend to be received by Rubicon prior

to Closing). As we will need to wait until January to finalise that number the exact Purchase Price will not be known until then, and

as a result the Closing will not occur until 31 January 2018.

The strategic rationale for the Proposed Transaction is three-fold, and can be summarised as follows –

• Rubicon needs to make the final two deferred-settlement payments in relation to the recent acquisition of ArborGen, totalling

US$15 million. In addition, Rubicon also needs to repay US$6 million of subordinated debt notes on 1 July 2018. Rubicon Limited

had unrestricted cash of US$12.5 million as at 30 September 2017 (i.e. as per our year-end Audited Financial Statements). Closing

of the Proposed Transaction will ensure there are no funding calls on Rubicon shareholders in order to be able to make these

payments, which in turn should remove any share-price ‘overhang’ that might exist today in relation to funding uncertainty;

• Once our TCLP investment is sold, Rubicon will be 100% focused on ArborGen, as that will then be our only investment. The

Sale will then make Rubicon a ‘pure-play’ for investors on the ArborGen business upside, and with Rubicon’s financials moving

forward then only being ArborGen-based, investors will have greater transparency of ArborGen’s financial results. These two

factors should enhance the attractiveness of the stock to a wider pool of investors; and

• Although not yet finalised, we believe that once the Sale of our TCLP investment has been settled, we will then be in a position to

achieve significant cost-out / savings of up to US$2 million pa (pre restructuring costs), depending on the final operating structure

and model chosen.

We believe that these three factors – the removal of any overhang in the stock price relating to uncertainty as to funding source

of the deferred ArborGen acquisition and subordinated debt payments, simplifying Rubicon to be a pure-play on the ArborGen

business, and the achievement of cost savings, will all be beneficial to building positive momentum in the RBC share price.

Given David Knott and Ranjan Tandon are directors of Rubicon and also principals of Knott and Libra respectively (which will each

acquire 20.0% of TCLP under the Proposed Transaction), they are treated as related parties to the Proposed Transaction. To ensure the

Proposed Transaction is fair to other Rubicon shareholders, the Board of Rubicon established an Independent Committee to manage

the Proposed Transaction. The Independent Committee, comprises independent directors George Karaplis and Steve Kasnet, and

specifically excluded David Knott, Dave Knott Jr and Ranjan Tandon as their funds and associates own 45.9% of Rubicon’s issued

shares. To assist the Committee, and in order to provide an independent assessment for shareholders, the Independent Directors

employed Grant Samuel to prepare an Independent Report to Rubicon’s shareholders (other than to Knott and Libra) on the merits

of the Proposed Transaction. Grant Samuel was selected because they understand the underlying TCLP clearwood business very

well, having valued the business twice in the past 12 months in relation to the two Tenon business sale transactions (the last report

was prepared earlier this year).

2
The Grant Samuel Independent Report is included in this documentation to Rubicon shareholders. In section 5.1 of that Report,

Evaluation and Summary of the Proposed Transaction, Grant Samuel concluded –

“In Grant Samuel’s opinion, the full underlying enterprise value of TCLP is in the range of US$51.3 – US$61.5 million. Rubicon’s pro

rata share of the full underlying value is US$13.6 – US$18.2 million. The consideration for the Proposed Transaction is forecast to be

approximately US$15.3 million which is within Grant Samuel’s assessed range of Rubicon’s 44.88% share of TCLP’s full underlying

value.”

And in Section 5.8 of the Report, Fairness of the Proposed Transaction for the purposes of the NZX Listing Rules, Grant Samuel

concludes:

“In Grant Samuel’s opinion, based on the analysis of the merits outlined above, the terms of the Proposed Transaction are fair and

reasonable to the shareholders of Rubicon not associated with Knott and Libra. In Grant Samuel’s opinion, the information to be

provided by Rubicon to its shareholders is sufficient to enable holders of those shares to understand all the relevant factors and

make an informed decision as to the sale of Rubicon’s interest in TCLP.”

The Independent Committee did not deem it necessary to run a third party sales process in relation to Rubicon’s interest in TCLP.

The rationale for that decision was based on the fact that Tenon had earlier this year been through an exhaustive 18-month sales

process for the Clearwood business supported by an international investment banker, and concluded that the TCLP consortium

provided the best value outcome. Given that the consideration offered under the Proposed Transaction is the same as that which

Rubicon invested into TCLP on 28 April 2017 (i.e. US$14.2 million) adjusted upwards for Rubicon’s share of the reduction in TCLP’s

Net Debt that has occurred since, the estimated Purchase Price falls within the Grant Samuel value range, and the Rubicon stake is

a non-strategic block in a Limited Partnership structure, there was no benefit to Rubicon shareholders (only considerable cost and

time delay) to be derived from running another extended sales process.

There will only be one resolution on which shareholders will be asked to vote upon at the Meeting, but it has two aspects to it. The

first, is in relation to NZX Listing Rule 9.1, which Rule requires an Ordinary Resolution of shareholders to approve a transaction that

would change the essential nature of Rubicon’s business. Although this may not be the case with the Sale of our TCLP investment,

we have chosen to take the conservative path and seek shareholder approval on this point. All shareholders are entitled to vote

on this aspect of the resolution. The second aspect, is in relation to Listing Rule 9.2, which requires an Ordinary Resolution to be

passed in order to approve a material transaction with related parties. As Knott, Libra, and their associates are related parties to the

Proposed Transaction, they are not entitled to vote on this Resolution.

As noted above, shareholder approval of the sale of Rubicon’s 44.88% interest in TCLP will result in ArborGen then being Rubicon’s

sole asset. We have great belief in the potential future upside in ArborGen. It is a global leader in advanced forestry genetics,

operating in the world’s major commercial tree species (pine and eucalyptus), in geographies with high annual planting rates

(Brazil, the US, and Australasia). It sells to major forestry players in those countries, and has a leading market position in its largest

commercial market, the US. It has a pre-eminent intellectual property position, which includes an industry-leading germplasm

repository (i.e. genetic library), a proprietary ‘tree machine’ platform, an extensive database of global trials, varietal and transgenic

technology, and a genomics platform - all protected by a patent portfolio and a ‘bank’ of trade secrets. It has a portfolio of advanced

products that do not require regulatory approval, which are currently being commercialised. In its last fiscal year, ArborGen turned

EBITDA positive, and its forecasts are for it to be cash-positive from now onwards. The considerable investment in research,

capability and customer preparation has been made. ArborGen is now all about commercialising that investment by converting its

customers to its advanced genetics products. We believe it is well positioned to do so, and that this will be reflected in its future

earnings, and hence in its value for Rubicon shareholders.

Your Independent Directors unanimously recommend that shareholders vote in favour of the Proposed Transaction, and

we look forward to meeting with you and discussing these matters at the Meeting on 12 January 2018.

Yours sincerely,


Steve Kasnet

On behalf of the Committee of Independent Directors

14 December 2017

3
Summary of the Proposed Transaction

PROPOSED TRANSACTION

Rubicon TC Holdings has determined that it will sell its 44.88% ownership interest in TCLP.

On 11 December 2017, Rubicon TC Holdings reached an agreement with Knott and Libra to (subject to requisite Rubicon shareholder

approval at this Meeting) sell to each of those parties 20.0% of TCLP’s issued shares (i.e. in the aggregate, 40.00% of its 44.88%

ownership interest). Rubicon TC Holdings’ remaining 4.88% ownership interest in TCLP will be offered to existing TCLP Partners under

the pre-emptive provisions of the LPA, and Rubicon TC Holdings expects the 4.88% to be fully acquired by some (or all) of the existing

TCLP Partners.

Disposition of Rubicon TC Holdings’ 44.88% ownership interest would then leave Rubicon with no ownership interest in TCLP.

The Proposed Transaction is subject to the approval by the Company’s shareholders as:

• a major transaction for the purposes of the NZX Main Board Listing Rules; and

• a material transaction with a related party for the purposes of the NZX Main Board Listing Rules.

The Purchase Price for Rubicon’s 44.88% ownership interest is estimated to be circa US$15.3 million, however the exact Purchase Price

will be dependent on TCLP’s Net Debt as at 31 December 2017, which number will not be known until January 2018. Accordingly, if

shareholders approve the Sale, Closing will not occur until 31 January 2018.

RECOMMENDATION

The Independent Directors unanimously recommend that shareholders vote in favour of the Proposed Transaction.

4
Business of the Meeting

Notice is hereby given that a meeting of shareholders (Meeting) of Rubicon Limited (the Company) will be held at 10.00am on

12 January 2018, at Rydges Latimer, 30 Latimer Square, Christchurch.

A. INTRODUCTION AND ADDRESS

B. SHAREHOLDER DISCUSSION

C. RESOLUTION

Resolution 1 – Proposed Transaction – Ordinary Resolution

There is only one resolution to be put to the Meeting, and that is:

To consider and, if thought fit, pass the following as an ordinary resolution under NZX Main Board Listing Rules 9.1 and 9.2:

That the Sale of Rubicon TC Holdings LP’s 44.88% ownership interest in TCLP, on the terms described in the Notice of Meeting,

be approved.

Discussion of the Shareholder Resolution

Explanatory Note to Resolution 1 – Proposed Transaction – Ordinary Resolution

NZX Main Board Listing Rules

NZX Main Board Listing Rule 9.1 provides that the Company and its subsidiaries must not enter into a transaction, or series of linked

or related transactions, to sell assets: (a) which would change the essential nature of the business of the Company; or (b) in respect

of which the gross value is in excess of 50% of the “average market capitalisation” of the Company and its subsidiaries, in each case

except with the prior approval of an ordinary resolution of the Company (or a special resolution if section 129 of the Companies

Act also applies). As the Proposed Transaction may change the essential nature of Rubicon’s business, approval is being sought for

the Proposed Transaction under the first limb of NZX Main Board Listing Rule 9.1. The Proposed Transaction falls beneath the 50%

threshold of the second limb of Listing Rule 9.1, and approval is not required under that limb.

The Proposed Transaction does not require approval as a “major transaction” for the Company under section 129 of the Companies Act.

NZX Main Board Listing Rule 9.2 provides that the Company and its subsidiaries must not enter into a “material transaction” if a

“related party” is a party to that transaction unless it is approved by shareholders by way of an ordinary resolution. For these purposes

a “material transaction” includes a disposal of assets having an “aggregate net value” in excess of 10% of the “average market

capitalisation” of the Company and its subsidiaries. The Purchasers are “related parties” of the Company, as Knott and Libra each

hold a relevant interest in 10% or more of Rubicon’s issued share capital (and, in the aggregate, own 45.9% of Rubicon’s issued share

capital with Knott owning 28.2% and Libra 17.7%). As related parties, neither Knott nor Libra (and their associates) will be able to

vote on this resolution for these purposes.

Procedural Notes

(i) Resolution 1 is required to be approved as an ordinary resolution, required to be passed by a simple majority of the votes of those

shareholders entitled to vote and voting on that resolution.

Votes cast on Resolution 1 will be counted first to determine whether or not it has been passed for the purposes of NZX Main

Board Listing Rule 9.1, and secondly to determine whether or not it has been passed for the purposes of NZX Main Board Listing

Rule 9.2. Resolution 1 will only take effect if Resolution 1 is approved by the required votes (as outlined above) and the Proposed

Transaction is completed.

As to the first count, all shareholders are entitled to vote on Resolution 1 for the purposes of the approval required under NZX

Main Board Listing Rule 9.1. As to the second count, any persons who are related parties or beneficiaries to the Proposed

Transaction (including Knott, Libra, and their associates) are disqualified persons under Listing Rule 9.3.1, and their votes will be

disregarded for the purposes of the approval required under NZX Main Board Listing Rule 9.2.

5
(ii) The persons who will be entitled to vote on the resolutions at this Meeting are those persons who are shareholders at 5.00pm,

5 January 2018 (New Zealand time), and only the shares registered in those shareholders’ names on that date may be voted at

the Meeting.

(iii) The accompanying Voting/Proxy Form should be used to vote on the resolutions. Shareholders can participate by postal vote, by

proxy or by casting their vote in person at the Meeting.

(iv) Shareholders may cast a postal vote on the resolutions to be voted on at the Meeting by indicating their voting directions on the

enclosed Voting/Proxy Form, signing the form and sending it either by post to the registered office of the Company or by post or

by fax to the office of the Share Registrar. The completed Voting/Proxy Form must be received no later than 10.00am, 10 January

2018 (New Zealand time). The Company Secretary has been authorised by the Board to receive and count postal votes at the

Meeting.

(v) Any shareholder who is entitled to attend and vote at the Meeting may appoint a proxy to attend and vote in their place. When

appointing a proxy, a shareholder can choose to either direct the proxy how to vote or leave the decision on how to vote up to

the proxy’s discretion. If a shareholder appoints a person who is not entitled to vote on a particular resolution as their proxy, that

proxy will not be able to cast that shareholder’s votes on that resolution unless they have been directed how to vote (i.e., the

proxy cannot exercise their discretion). A shareholder wishing to appoint a proxy should complete the enclosed Voting/Proxy Form

and send it either by post to the registered office of the Company or by post or by fax to the office of the Share Registrar. The

completed Voting/Proxy Form must be received no later than 10.00am, 10 January 2018 (New Zealand time). A proxy does not

have to be a shareholder in the Company. For example, shareholders may appoint the chairman of the Meeting to act as their

proxy, or another person. The chairman of the Meeting, in that capacity, will vote discretionary proxies held by the “chairman of

the meeting” in favour of the resolution.

(vi) Rubicon directors Hugh Fletcher, William Hasler, and Luke Moriarty, and management, (and/or parties associated with them), hold

shares in TCLP. While they are not contractually required or committed to acquire any of the shares Rubicon is proposing to sell,

they do have pro-rata pre-emptive rights (common to all TCLP shareholders) under the LPA which would enable them to do so in

respect to some of the 4.88% not being acquired by Knott and Libra. All have indicated that they, and their associates, will not

vote Rubicon shares held by them (if any) on the Resolution. The three directors were not members of Rubicon’s Independent

Committee. Please also refer the table of shares held by Rubicon Directors and/or associated persons shown on page 8.

(vii) This Notice of Meeting has been approved by NZX Limited in accordance with NZX Main Board Listing Rule 6.1.1, however, NZX

dos not take responsibility for any statement contained in this Notice of Meeting.

(viii) Shareholders may revoke their proxies by giving written notice of revocation to the registered office of the Company or the office

of the Share Registrar no later than 10.00am, 10 January 2018 (New Zealand time).

(ix) Address details for the Share Registrar are set out in the Voting/Proxy Form.

By Order of the Board

Auckland

New Zealand

14 December 2017


Mark Taylor

Company Secretary

Rubicon Limited

6
The Proposed Transaction

Investment being sold

Rubicon TC Holdings’ 44.88% ownership interest in TCLP (i.e. 14,226,000 TCLP shares). TCLP is the owner of the Clearwood business

and operations formerly owned by Tenon. Rubicon has agreed to guarantee Rubicon TC Holdings’ obligations under the Agreement.

Consideration

The Purchase Price is US$14,226,000, plus the reduction in Net Debt between 28 April 2017 (being the day Rubicon TC Holdings

acquired its interest in TCLP) and 31 December 2017 multiplied by 44.88%. As the reduction in Net Debt will not be known until

January 2018, the exact Purchase Price is unknown today, however it is currently estimated to be circa US$15.3 million (net of a US$0.7

million dividend to be received by Rubicon prior to Closing). The Purchase Price will be advised to shareholders on 10 January 2018,

following calculation of the 31 December 2017 TCLP Net Debt position. If Rubicon shareholders approve the Proposed Transaction, the

Purchase Price is payable in cash, on 31 January 2018.

Purchasers

The Purchasers of Rubicon TC Holding’s 44.88% ownership interest in TCLP are Knott and Libra as to 40.0% (i.e. 12,680,000 TCLP

shares, or 6,340,000 TCLP shares to each of Knott and Libra), and the purchasers of the remaining 4.88% (i.e. 1,546,000 TCLP shares)

will be some (or all) of the existing TCLP Partners under the Partner pre-emptive provisions of the LPA.

Key conditions

The Proposed Transaction is subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, including:

• The approval of the Company’s shareholders;

• No injunctions or restraints having been enacted or enforced by any governmental authority or any other legal restraint or prohibition

preventing the consummation of the transactions contemplated under the Agreement;

• The BNZ, as lender to the TCLP, unconditionally approving the Proposed Transaction and continuing to make available its current

bank facilities to TCLP on existing terms; and

• There having been no material adverse change in the Clearwood business between signing and Closing.

The Sale Agreement will terminate if any of the conditions have not been fulfilled by 15 February 2018.

Exclusivity arrangements

Rubicon has agreed not to actively pursue any proposals with any person in relation to a potential Sale of its TCLP investment unless

the Sale Agreement has been terminated in accordance with its terms. If Rubicon receives an unsolicited approach from a third party

to acquire Rubicon TC Holdings’ 44.88% interest in TCLP (an Alternative Proposal), it must advise that third party of the existence

of the Sale Agreement and notify the Purchasers of the approach received (including its terms). However, Rubicon may engage with

a third party in respect of an Alternative Proposal if it is received before shareholders approve the Proposed Transaction, the Board

considers that it is superior to the Proposed Transaction and believes the TCLP Partners would waive their pre-emptive rights to allow

the Alternative Proposal to proceed and the BNZ would approve the Alternative Proposal, and the Board has received legal advice that

failure to act on such a proposal (a Superior Proposal) would be likely to violate their fiduciary duties. Rubicon must give the Purchasers

the opportunity to match any such Superior Proposal.

Key representations, warranties and undertakings

Rubicon TC Holdings and Rubicon warrant to Knott, Libra, and the existing Partner purchasers of its TCLP interest, that:

• The Company has full legal title to the Shares; and

• The Company is duly authorised to enter into the Proposed Transaction.

Other warranties given are limited in nature, have a life of only six months, and a maximum aggregate claim amount of US$0.4 million,

with the main warranty being that the Company did not make any claim (and did not elect not to pursue a claim) under the warranties

given by Tenon in the Tenon Purchase Agreement, and no circumstance existed that would have allowed TCLP to make such a claim,

and there is no fact, circumstance or matter now existing that would allow a claim to proceed under the Tenon Purchase Agreement

had that warranty period not already expired.

Knott, Libra, and the existing Partner purchasers of Rubicon TC Holdings’ TCLP interest, acknowledge that apart from the above

warranties made by TC Holdings and Rubicon, that no other warranties or representations are being given, and that they are relying

solely on their own judgement, investigations, and professional advice, and that they are not relying on any statement, undertaking,

representation or warranty of any kind, other than the warranties noted above.

Knott and Libra have undertaken to sign a deed of adherence to TCLP in the form required by the LPA.

7
Closing

If the Company’s shareholders approve the Proposed Transaction at the Meeting and all other conditions are satisfied, Closing of the

Proposed Transaction will take place on 31 January 2018.

Use of Sale proceeds

The net proceeds of the Proposed Transaction (together with existing cash resources) will be used to meet the outstanding US$15

million in deferred settlement payments relating to the ArborGen acquisition made by Rubicon earlier this year, and the repayment of

the outstanding US$6 million subordinated note on 1 July 2018. Rubicon’s residual cash balance (net of restructuring costs) will then

be used to advance ArborGen’s business and operations.

Guarantee and other covenants provided by the Company

Rubicon has guaranteed Rubicon TC Holdings’ performance of its obligations under the Sale Agreement.

Summary of Independent Advisers’ Report to shareholders

Grant Samuel & Associates Limited was commissioned by the Independent Directors to undertake an independent review of the

Proposed Transaction. Section 5.8 of Grant Samuel’s report, Fairness of the Proposed Transaction for the purposes of the NZX Listing

Rules, concludes:

“In Grant Samuel’s opinion, based on the analysis of the merits outlined above, the terms of the Proposed Transaction are fair and

reasonable to the shareholders of Rubicon not associated with Knott and Libra. In Grant Samuel’s opinion, the information to be

provided by Rubicon to its shareholders is sufficient to enable holders of those shares to understand all the relevant factors and make

an informed decision as to the sale of Rubicon’s interest in TCLP.”

A full copy of the Grant Samuel report is appended to this Notice of Meeting, and the above extract should not be read in isolation

from the full Grant Samuel report. Please also make reference to page 7 of the Grant Samuel report, where a schematic of Rubicon’s

investment ownership position is shown.

If the Proposed Transaction does not proceed

As described above, the Proposed Transaction is subject to the Company’s shareholders approving it at the Meeting. The Proposed

Transaction will not complete in the event that shareholders do not approve it or one of the other conditions is not satisfied or waived.

There are no break fees or termination fees should the Proposed Transaction not be approved by shareholders.

Rubicon would then continue to own 44.88% of TCLP, and it would continue to be subject to the risks and influences to which

it is currently exposed. Those influences include the level of activity in the various sectors of the economies in which it competes,

particularly in New Zealand, Europe, and North America, fluctuations in industrial output, commercial and residential construction

activity, capital availability, housing turnover and pricing, levels of repairs, remodelling and additions to existing homes, new housing

starts, fibre availability, relative exchange rates (particularly Euro and US$), interest rates and profitability of customers. Other risks

include competitor product development, product demand and pricing, input costs, and customer concentration risk.

In addition, Rubicon would need to find another source of funding in order to meet the outstanding US$15 million in deferred

settlement payments relating to the ArborGen acquisition made earlier this year, and the repayment of the outstanding US$6 million

subordinated notes, all by 1 July 2018.

If the Proposed Transaction does not proceed, Rubicon would not be able to remove all of the estimated (up to) US$2 million per

annum in overhead savings.

Whilst Rubicon believes the 4.88% proposed to be sold to existing TCLP Partners will be fully acquired by those Partners, if it were not

then Rubicon would look to sell any remaining balance to other parties.

Alternatives to the Proposed Transaction

The main alternative to the Proposed Transaction that was considered was the issuance of new Rubicon equity. The Independent

Committee rejected this alternative, given its belief that the Rubicon share price is materially undervalued at the current level, that any

share placement would be dilutive to non-participating shareholders, and that a rights issue would be expensive and time-consuming

to complete and with unknown certainty of outcome in the absence of a full underwrite.

Recommendation

The Independent Directors consider that the Closing of the Proposed Transaction is in the Company’s best interests and

of benefit to all shareholders and, as a result, unanimously recommend that shareholders vote in favour of the Proposed

Transaction.

8
Directors

Directors of the Company, and associated persons of those Directors, who own Rubicon shares are shown in the table below.

Shares held by Directors and/or associated persons

DirectorHow heldNumber of

Ordinary Shares

% of Rubicon


issued shares

David Knott, Dave Knott Jr, and AssociatesBeneficial137,663,11128.2%

Libra Funds LP, Ranjan Tandon, and AssociatesBeneficial86,108,41917.7%

H.A. FletcherNon-Beneficial5,775,2861.2%

W.A. HaslerBeneficial823,8040.2%

S.G. KasnetBeneficial and


Non-Beneficial

613,2200.1%

S.L. MoriartyBeneficial3,495,4760.7%

9
Glossary

The following terms have the following meanings when used in this Notice of Meeting.

Associates means, in respect of a person, that person’s “Associated Persons” for the purposes of the NZX Main Board Listing

Rules. In broad terms, a person (the “first person”) is an Associated Person of another person (the “second person”) if, in making a

decision or exercising a power affecting the Company, the first person could be influenced as a consequence of an arrangement or

relationship existing between, or involving, the first person and the second person.

Board means the board of directors of the Company.

Closing means 31 January 2018.

Companies Act means the Companies Act 1993 (New Zealand).

Company means Rubicon Limited and/or Rubicon TC Holdings LP as the context may require.

Directors mean the directors of the Company.

Group means Rubicon Limited and its subsidiaries.

Guarantor means Rubicon Limited, who is guaranteeing the performance by Rubicon TC Holdings of its obligations under the Sale

Agreement.

Independent Committee means a Committee of Independent Directors.

Independent Directors means George Karaplis and Steve Kasnet.

Knott means Dorset Management Corporation, and Knott Partners LP (who together with Associates own 28.2% of Rubicon’s

issued shares).

Libra means Libra Partners NZ, LLC, and Libra Fund LP (who together with Associates own 17.7% of Rubicon’s issued shares).

LPA means the Limited Partnership Agreement that governs TCLP.

Meeting means the meeting of shareholders of the Company, to be held on 12 January 2018, and any adjournments or

postponements thereof.

Net Debt means TCLP’s outstanding bank debt (inclusive of accrued and unpaid interest) less cash at bank and liquid deposits

(including accrued and unpaid interest receivable).

Notice of Meeting means this notice of meeting by the Company for the purpose of calling the Meeting.

NZ$ means New Zealand dollars.

NZX Main Board means the main board equity securities market operated by NZX.

Partner(s) means a Limited Partner owning shares issued by TCLP.

Purchase Price refers to the Purchase price for all Rubicon TC Holdings’ ownership interest in TCLP, and means US$14,226,000,

plus the US$ amount by which Net Debt has reduced (in the period from 28 April 2017 through to 31 December 2017) multiplied by

44.88%.

Purchase Price Per Share means Purchase Price divided by 14,226,000.

Proposed Transaction means the Sale of Rubicon TC Holdings’ ownership interest in TCLP.

Purchaser(s) means Knott, Libra, and the existing TCLP shareholders who purchase 4.88% of TCLP.

Rubicon means Rubicon Limited or, where the context requires, the group comprising Rubicon Limited and its subsidiaries.

Rubicon TC Holdings means Rubicon TC Holdings LP, the direct owner of Rubicon’s 44.88% TCLP shares.

Sale means the sale of Rubicon TC Holdings’ 44.88% ownership interest in TCLP.

Sale Agreement means the sale and purchase agreement relating to Rubicon TC Holdings’ ownership interest in TCLP, between

Rubicon TC Holdings (and Rubicon Limited as Guarantor) and the Purchasers, over 40% of TCLP’s issued shares.

Share Registrar means Computershare Investor Services Limited.

TCLP means the Tenon Clearwood Limited Partnership, which, on 28 April 2017, acquired the assets of the Clearwood business

formerly owned by Tenon Limited.

Tenon means Tenon Limited or, where the context requires, the group comprising Tenon Limited and its subsidiaries.

Tenon Purchase Agreement means the sale and purchase agreement relating to the Clearwood business and assets, dated 14

February 2017, between Tenon Manufacturing Limited, Tenon, and TCLP.

US$ means United States dollars.

Voting/Proxy Form means the voting / proxy form accompanying this Notice of Meeting.

1
RUBICON LIMITED

INDEPENDENT APPRAISAL REPORT ON THE PROPOSED SALE OF RUBICON

LIMITED’S INTEREST IN TENON CLEARWOOD LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

GRANT SAMUEL & ASSOCIATES LIMITED

DECEMBER 2017



2

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 TERMS OF THE PROPOSED TRANSACTION ____________________________________________________ 3

1.1 Background _______________________________________________________________________ 3

1.2 Details of the Proposed Transaction ____________________________________________________ 3

2 SCOPE OF THE REPORT ___________________________________________________________________ 5

2.1 Purpose of the Report _______________________________________________________________ 5

2.2 Requirements of the NZX Listing Rules __________________________________________________ 5

2.3 Basis of Evaluation __________________________________________________________________ 6

3 PROFILE OF RUBICON ____________________________________________________________________ 7

3.1 History ___________________________________________________________________________ 7

3.2 Rubicon Forecast Financial Performance ________________________________________________ 8

3.3 Rubicon Financial Position ____________________________________________________________ 9

3.4 Cash Flows _______________________________________________________________________ 10

3.5 Tenon Clearwood Limited Partnership _________________________________________________ 10

3.6 Profile of ArborGen ________________________________________________________________ 14

3.7 Rubicon’s Ownership _______________________________________________________________ 17

3.8 Rubicon’s Share Price Performance ___________________________________________________ 17

4 VALUATION OF TENON CLEARWOOD LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ___________________________________ 18

4.1 Summary ________________________________________________________________________ 18

4.2 Earnings for Valuation ______________________________________________________________ 19

4.3 Preferred Methodology _____________________________________________________________ 19

4.4 Earnings Multiple Analysis ___________________________________________________________ 20

5 MERITS OF THE PROPOSED TRANSACTION __________________________________________________ 23

5.1 Evaluation and Summary of the Proposed Transaction ____________________________________ 23

5.2 Evaluation of the Sale Price and Terms of the Proposed Transaction _________________________ 23

5.3 Merits of the Proposed Transaction ___________________________________________________ 23

5.4 The likelihood of an alternative offer __________________________________________________ 24

5.5 Evaluation on the impact of Rubicon’s earnings and financial position ________________________ 25

5.6 Alternatives to the Proposed Transaction _______________________________________________ 26

5.7 The timing and circumstances surrounding the Proposed Transaction ________________________ 26

5.8 Fairness of the Proposed Transaction for the purposes of the NZX Listing Rules ________________ 26

5.9 Acceptance or Rejection of the Proposed Transaction _____________________________________ 26

APPENDIX 1 RECENT TRANSACTION EVIDENCE ___________________________________________________ 26

APPENDIX 2 COMPARABLE LISTED COMPANIES __________________________________________________ 28

APPENDIX 3 OVERVIEW OF THE NEW ZEALAND TIMBER PROCESSING INDUSTRY ________________________ 29

APPENDIX 4 VALUATION METHODOLOGY DESCRIPTIONS ___________________________________________ 30

APPENDIX 5 INTERPRETATION OF MULTIPLES ____________________________________________________ 32

APPENDIX 6 QUALIFICATIONS, DECLARATIONS AND CONSENTS ______________________________________ 34



3

1 Terms of the Proposed Transaction

1.1 Background

On 11 December 2017, Rubicon Limited (Rubicon) announced that it proposes to sell its 44.88%

shareholding

1

in Tenon Clearwood Limited Partnership (TCLP) to Dorset Management Corporation (an

affiliate of Knott Partners LP) (Knott), Libra Partners NZ, LLC (an affiliate of Libra Fund LP) (Libra) and the

other partners in TCLP (together the Proposed Purchasers) for consideration estimated to be US$15.3

million, representing the cost of Rubicon’s investment into TCLP in April 2017 (US$14.2 million) plus Rubicon’s

share of the net cash generated in TCLP in the period from 28 April 2017 through to 31 December 2017

(estimated to be US$1.1 million following the payment of an upcoming dividend of US$0.7 million in

December 2017)

2

(the Proposed Transaction).


A summary of the proportion of Rubicon’s TCLP shares that the Proposed Purchasers are acquiring is outlined

below:

PROPOSED PURCHASERS – PROPORTION OF SHARES ACQUIRED

% OF TCLP SHAREHOLDING ACQUIRED

Knott 20.00%

Libra 20.00%

Existing TCLP Limited Partners 4.88%

Share % to be acquired 44.88%


Under the TCLP Partnership Agreement, the Limited Partners have pre-emptive rights should partners wish

to sell their shareholding. All existing Partners have agreed to waive their pre-emptive rights over the 40%

interest in TCLP being sold to Knott and Libra. The residual 4.88% balance is to be taken up by existing TCLP

Limited Partners under the pre-emptive provisions of the TCLP Partnership Agreement.

In June 2017, Rubicon acquired the remaining 66.66% of the shares it did not own in US-based forestry

genetics company, ArborGen Inc. (ArborGen) for US$28.5 million. Rubicon needs to make two final deferred-

settlement payments totalling US$15 million to complete the purchase of ArborGen. In addition, Rubicon

also needs to repay US$6 million of subordinated debt notes on 30 June 2018.


The sale of the 44.88% interest in TCLP will result in ArborGen being Rubicon’s sole asset.


The completion of the Proposed Transaction will ensure funding calls on Rubicon Shareholders will not be

required in order for Rubicon to meet all of these payments.


1.2 Details of the Proposed Transaction

The proposed sale of Rubicon’s 44.88% shareholding in TCLP is subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions

which include:

§ the approval of the Proposed Transaction. There will be one resolution on which shareholders will be

asked to vote on:

• an ordinary resolution of shareholders to approve the Proposed Transaction as it may change

the essential nature of Rubicon’s business. This is required under Listing Rule 9.1; and

• an ordinary resolution to approve a material transaction with a related party. This is required

under Listing Rule 9.2.

§ the BNZ, as lender to TCLP, unconditionally approving the Proposed Transaction and continuing to make

available its current bank facilities to TCLP on existing terms;

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

1

Shares are held by Rubicon TC Holdings, a 100% subsidiary of Rubicon Limited. For the purpose of this report company means Rubicon Limited or Rubicon TC

Holdings Limited as the case may be.

2

The net debt position will not be known until 10 January 2018.



4

§ TCLP’s business not having suffered a material adverse change (or an event having occurred that is

reasonably likely to result in that occurring); and

§ no law being enacted or enforced that prevents the consummation of the Proposed Transaction.

The fundamental warranties being provided to the Proposed Purchasers are that Rubicon:

§ has full legal title to the Shares; and

§ is duly authorised to enter into the Proposed Transaction.


Other warranties being given are limited in nature, have a life of only six months, and a maximum aggregate

claim amount of US$0.4 million.


Rubicon has entered into an exclusivity agreement with the Proposed Purchasers not to actively pursue any

proposals with any person in relation to a potential sale of its TCLP investment unless the Proposed

Transaction sale agreement (Sale Agreement) has been terminated in accordance with its terms. If Rubicon

receives an unsolicited approach from a third party to acquire Rubicon’s 44.88% interest in TCLP (an

Alternative Proposal), it must advise that third party of the existence of the Sale Agreement and notify the

Proposed Purchasers of the approach received (including its terms). However, Rubicon may engage with a

third party in respect of an Alternative Proposal if:

§ it is received before shareholders approve the Proposed Transaction; and

§ the Independent Committee:

• considers that it is superior to the Proposed Transaction; and

• believes the TCLP Partners would waive their pre-emptive rights to allow the Alternative Proposal

to proceed; and

• believes the BNZ would approve the Alternative Proposal; and

§ the Committee has received legal advice that failure to act on such a proposal would be likely to violate

their fiduciary duties.

Rubicon must give the Proposed Purchasers the opportunity to match any such superior proposal. 



The Proposed Acquisition is conditional upon the resolution being passed by Rubicon shareholders. If the

resolution is passed by Rubicon shareholders, the transaction is expected to be completed on 31 January

2018.



5

2 Scope of the Report

2.1 Purpose of the Report

The Independent Directors of Rubicon have engaged Grant Samuel and Associates (Grant Samuel) to prepare

an Independent Appraisal Report to consider the Proposed Transaction. Grant Samuel is independent of

Rubicon, the Proposed Purchasers and the TCLP and has no involvement with, or interest in, the outcome of

the Proposed Transaction.


The Proposed Transaction is subject to both Rule 9.1 of the NZSX Listing Rules relating to the disposal of a

listed company’s assets and Rule 9.2 relating to transactions with related parties.


The Notice of Meeting to consider the Proposed Transaction must contain such information, reports,

valuations, and other material as are necessary to enable the holders of Rubicon shares to appraise the

implications of the Proposed Transaction.


A copy of this report will accompany the Notice of Meeting to be sent to all Rubicon shareholders. This report

is addressed to Rubicon’s Independent Directors, for the benefit of Rubicon shareholders not associated with

Knott and Libra and their associates.


The report should not be used for any purpose other than as an expression of Grant Samuel’s opinion as to

the fairness of the Proposed Transaction. This report should be read in conjunction with the Qualifications,

Declarations and Consents outlined at Appendix 6.


2.2 Requirements of the NZX Listing Rules

2.2.1 Major transaction under Listing Rule 9.1.

Listing Rule 9.1.1 provides that, except with the prior approval of an ordinary resolution, Rubicon may not

enter into any transaction or series of linked or related transactions to acquire, sell, exchange, or otherwise

dispose of assets in Rubicon:


a) which would change the essential nature of the business of the Company; or

b) in respect of which the gross value is in excess of 50% of the average market capitalisation of the

Company.


In accordance with 9.1.2, an Appraisal Report is required to accompany the Notice of Meeting to approve

the required ordinary resolution.


2.2.2 Transaction with Related Parties under Listing Rule 9.2.1.

Listing Rule 9.2.1 requires that where there is a material transaction with a Related Party, it must be approved

by the shareholders other than the related parties and its associates. The Notice of Meeting must be

accompanied by an Appraisal Report which contains such information as is necessary for Rubicon

shareholders to decide whether the terms of the proposed sale are fair.


Some of the Proposed Purchasers are considered to be Related Parties of Rubicon, as the beneficial

shareholders of Knott and Libra each hold a relevant interest in 10% or more of Rubicon’s issued share capital.

Knott and Libra together hold 45.9% of Rubicon’s shares. In relation to Rule 9.2, Knott and Libra and their

associates cannot vote on that part of the ordinary resolution.


In addition, Rubicon directors Hugh Fletcher, William Hasler and Luke Moriarty, and management, (and/or

parties associated with them) hold shares in TCLP and will not vote their Rubicon shares on the resolution.

While they are not contractually required or committed to acquire any of the TCLP shares Rubicon is

proposing to sell, they have pro rata pre-emptive rights (common to all TCLP shareholders) under the TCLP

Partnership Agreement, which will enable them to acquire shares in respect to some of the 4.88% not being

acquired by Knott and Libra.



6

2.2.3 Appraisal Report Requirements

Pursuant to Listing Rule 1.7.2, the Appraisal Report is required to:

§ be addressed to the Independent Directors of Rubicon;

§ be expressed to be for the benefit of the shareholders of Rubicon not associated with Knott and Libra

and their associates;

§ state whether or not in the opinion of Grant Samuel the consideration and the terms and condition of

the proposed sale of the 44.88% interest in TCLP are “fair” to Rubicon’s shareholders (other than those

associated with Knott and Libra and their associates);

§ state whether or not in Grant Samuel’s opinion the information to be provided by Rubicon to its

shareholders is sufficient to enable holders of those shares to understand all the relevant factors and

make an informed decision as to the “fairness” of the proposed sale and the grounds for that opinion;

§ state whether Grant Samuel has obtained all information which it believes desirable for the purposes

of preparing the report, including all relevant information which is or should have been known by any

director of Rubicon and made available to the directors;

§ state any material assumptions on which Grant Samuel’s opinion is based; and

§ state any term of reference which may have materially restricted the scope of the report.


The term “fair” has no legal definition in New Zealand either in the NZX Listing Rules or in any other statutes

dealing with securities or commercial law. However, guidance in interpreting and applying the rule can be

gained both from regulatory interpretation in other jurisdictions and rulings made by the NZX.


The decision of each Rubicon shareholder as to whether or not to vote in favour of the Proposed Transaction

is a matter for individual shareholders, having considered all relevant factors and their own preference either

in favour of or against the Proposed Transaction.


2.3 Basis of Evaluation

Grant Samuel has evaluated the Proposed Transaction by reviewing the following factors:

§ the estimated value range of the 44.88% interest in TCLP and the value of the Proposed Transaction

when compared to the estimated value range;

§ the likelihood of an alternative offer and alternative transactions that could realise fair value;

§ any advantages or disadvantages for Rubicon shareholders of accepting or rejecting the Proposed

Transaction;

§ the potential alternatives to the Proposed Transaction and the process followed to yield these

outcomes; and

§ reviewing the current trading conditions for TCLP and the timing and circumstances surrounding the

Proposed Transaction.




7

3 Profile of Rubicon

3.1 History

Rubicon was formed as a new company to assist in the separation of the Fletcher Challenge Group, and also

in the capitalisation of Fletcher Forests Limited (Fletcher Forests) to allow that company to become a stand-

alone entity. Tenon Limited (Tenon) subsequently emerged from the restructuring of Fletcher Forests, which

itself was originally part of the Fletcher Challenge Limited (Fletcher Challenge) group of companies. As part

of the Fletcher Challenge separation transactions Fletcher Forests received NZ$90 million from a placement

of Fletcher Forests shares to newly formed Rubicon and NZ$80 million from the sale of its South American

and biotechnology assets to Rubicon. The Fletcher Challenge separation was implemented in March 2001,

following which Rubicon and Fletcher Forests traded as separate publicly listed entities.


In late 2002, Fletcher Forests transitioned from a forestry growth strategy to refocus its business on the

higher yielding wood processing, marketing and in-market distribution activities. In 2003 Fletcher Forests

sold all of its forest estates and contemporaneously with the sale, changed its name to Tenon. Sale proceeds

from the forest estate sale were distributed to shareholders. In March 2004, Rubicon successfully launched

a takeover bid to acquire 50.01% of Tenon, and it has since increased its ownership interest to 59.78%.


In December 2016, Tenon sold the company’s North American business to Blue Wolf Capital for

approximately US$113 million (the Tenon USA Transaction).


In April 2017, Tenon sold its last remaining asset, the Clearwood business (Clearwood) to TCLP. As a result

of this transaction:

§ Rubicon became a 44.88% shareholder in TCLP, at a cost of US$14.2 million; and

§ Tenon delisted from the NZX Main Board on 31 July 2017 and Tenon shareholders have voted to place

Tenon into voluntary liquidation given it no longer has any operating assets. The proportion of the

Tenon cash surplus upon completion of the liquidation payable to Rubicon is estimated to be around

US$2.6 million, and the payment should be able to be made in the first quarter of 2018.


Today, Rubicon is comprised of:

§ a 100% interest in US-based forestry genetics company, ArborGen;

§ a 44.88% interest in TCLP; and

§ a 59.78% interest in Tenon.

RUBICON – SUMMARISED COMPANY STRUCTURE




Entering voluntary liquidation

59.78%

shareholder

100.00%

shareholder

44.88%

shareholder

Rubicon

100.00%

shareholder

Clearwood

AborGen

Tenon

TCLP



8

The sale of Rubicon’s interest in TCLP and the liquidation of Tenon will result in ArborGen being Rubicon’s

sole asset. Rubicon has a 100% voting interest and ownership in ArborGen, and a 95% economic interest due

to outstanding warrants relating to ArborGen’s acquisition of Cellfor in 2012. The warrants are automatically

exercised upon an IPO of ArborGen or alternatively at any time if 66.7% of the warrant holders elect to do

so. The warrants can also be exercised by ArborGen if substantially all of ArborGen’s assets are sold or if

50.01% or more of ArborGen’s shares are sold. The warrants do not provide the holders with access to

dividends. In addition, ArborGen’s senior management team hold options in respect of 5.3% of ArborGen’s

issued capital. The options are fully vested and are exercisable at the same price per share paid by Rubicon

(when it moved to 100% ownership of ArborGen in June 2017) by the option holders upon an IPO of

ArborGen, the sale of all or substantially all of ArborGen’s assets or shares, or the issue of new shares

resulting in a change in majority control of ArborGen.


3.2 Rubicon Forecast Financial Performance

The pro forma forecast financial performance of Rubicon for the 12 months ending 31 March 2018 (FY18)

(prior to the Proposed Transaction) is summarised below:

RUBICON PRO FORMA FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE (US$MILLIONS)

YEAR ENDED 31 MARCH 2018F

Revenue

128.8

Cost of sales (98.6)

Gross profit

30.2

Gross margin %

23%

Overhead expenses

(13.8)

EBITDA

16.4

EBITDA margin %

13%

Depreciation and amortisation

(10.3)

EBIT 6.1

Net Interest (4.0)

Net profit before tax

2.1

Tax

-

Net profit after tax

2.1


The following points should be taken into consideration when reviewing the table above:

§ over the last 12 months Rubicon has changed its balance date from 30 June to 30 September, Tenon

(which is consolidated into Rubicon’s accounts) sold its US distribution business to Blue Wolf, and

Clearwood to TCLP, and Rubicon acquired the remaining 66.66% of the shares in ArborGen that it did

not already own. The transaction activity and balance date change makes it challenging to compare

Rubicon’s financial performance prior periods;

§ the pro forma forecast presented above combines the FY18 forecast for TCLP and ArborGen (detailed

below). It is important to note that, although TCLP is consolidated into Rubicon’s financial statements

(because it has a 50.01% voting control by virtue of voting control agreements over 5.13% of the TCLP

shares), it only owns 44.88% of TCLP and Rubicon shareholders are, subject to meeting various bank

covenants, only entitled to its proportion of net profit before taxation from the business;

§ the pro forma position before the Proposed Transaction is outlined above as it is used to assess the

merits of the Proposed Transaction (see section 5.5); and

§ analysis of the underlying financial performance of TCLP and ArborGen are provided in sections 3.5 and

3.6 of this report.



9

3.3 Rubicon Financial Position

The financial position of Rubicon as at 30 September 2017, as reported in Rubicon’s 2017 audited financial

statements and the pro forma financial position after the liquidation of Tenon, payment of the deferred-

settlement payments in relation to the acquisition of ArborGen and the repayment of the subordinated debt

is summarised below:

RUBICON – FINANCIAL POSITION (US$ MILLIONS)

AS AT 30 SEPTEMBER 2017 AS REPORTED

PRO FORMA

ADJUSTMENTS

PRO FORMA POSITION

BEFORE THE

PROPOSED

TRANSACTION

Receivables

9.1 - 9.1

Inventory 41.0 - 41.0

Creditors (23.6) 1.1 (22.5)

Current lease obligation (0.7) - (0.7)

Working capital

25.8 1.1 26.9

Fixed assets 62.0 - 62.0

Goodwill 18.0 - 18.0

Intellectual property 106.9 - 106.9

Deferred tax liability (6.0) - (6.0)

Net operating assets

206.7 1.1 207.8

Cash and liquid deposits 31.2 (23.8) 7.4

Deferred settlement (15.0) 15.0 -

Current Debt (17.9) 6.0 (11.9)

Term debt (33.3) - (33.3)

Net bank debt

(35.0) (2.8) (37.8)

Lease obligation (11.9) - (11.9)

Net debt

(46.9) (2.8) (49.7)

Net assets 159.8 (1.7) 158.1


The following points should be taken into consideration when reviewing the table above:

§ the pro forma position before the Proposed Transaction is outlined above as it is used to assess the

merit of the Proposed Transaction (see section 5.5);

§ the pro forma financial position assumes a US$2.6 million capital return from the liquidation of Tenon;

and

§ analysis of the underlying balance sheets of TCLP and ArborGen are provided in sections 3.5 and 3.6.



10

3.4 Cash Flows

The pro forma forecast cash flows for Rubicon for FY18F are summarised below:

RUBICON – PRO FORMA FREE CASH FLOW (US$ MILLIONS)

YEAR END 31 MARCH

3

2018F

EBITDA less finance costs 12.4

Less: Capital expenditure (3.2)

Less: R&D (5.8)

Free cash flow before movements in working capital 3.4


3.5 Tenon Clearwood Limited Partnership

3.5.1 Business operations

TCLP (i.e. Clearwood) is the leading New Zealand manufacturer of radiata clear wood products for sale into

the high-value global markets in Europe and the US. The business comprises a large grade cutting mill in

Taupo, New Zealand with an associated remanufacturing plant, and integrated global sales and marketing

activities. The company is responsible for exporting approximately 30% of the total manufactured pine

products from New Zealand to the US, and is the fifth largest containerised exporter out of New Zealand.

Clearwood employs approximately 275 full time equivalent staff and operates in the New Zealand Timber

Processing industry. An overview of the New Zealand Timber Processing industry is provided in Appendix 3.


The US is Clearwood’s primary export market, being the destination for approximately 85% of all its high-

value products, with Europe being Clearwood’s second major fast-developing market. Clearwood’s key

export markets are described below:

§ United States - supplying into the new home construction market (via its own sales and distribution

arm (Taupo Wood Solutions selling to pro-dealers and wholesalers) and to the remodelling & renovation

market both directly and indirectly (through Empire, under a 5-year exclusive arrangement);

§ Europe - supplying the high-value, high-growth wood modification market; and

§ Other markets - these primarily comprise China and New Zealand for lower-grade ‘shop’ and industrial

product.


New Zealand’s pruned radiata pine resource is unique globally as the harvested log at maturity contains

approximately 5.0-5.5 metres in length of clear (no knots) high quality fibre – this is the genesis of Tenon’s

‘Clearwood’ business name. Although clear wood represents only 30% of the volume of a pruned log, it

typically represents more than 50% of the log’s total value.


The Clearwood operation procures approximately 300,000 m

3

annually of high quality pruned logs from

Central North Island forest owners. At its operations in Taupo, it converts the logs into long length, clear

boards, moulding and related products. Initially, Clearwood converted these logs solely into clear commodity

lumber and sold that to US-based remanufacturers, however over the past decade Clearwood has developed

its own portfolio of customers and markets for finished processed clear products, to such an extent that

today 85% of Clearwood’s high-value clear product is sold by it in remanufactured form, with only 15% being

sold as clear lumber.


_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

3

Includes 100% of TCLP’s cash flow.



11

3.5.2 Procurement

Clearwood is the largest consumer of pruned logs in New Zealand, and sources the vast majority of its

requirements from the Central North Island forest estate. The projected supply from this market is shown

below:

PROJECTED CENTRAL NORTH ISLAND PRUNED LOG RESOURCE

4



Clearwood benefits from having in-depth knowledge of the forestry market, as it was the previous owner of

significant forest resources in the Central North Island. This gives the company insights into log quality,

demand and supply requirements, industry volume and price metrics, assisting Clearwood in its objective of

acquiring the highest quality logs at the lowest average delivered price.


3.5.3 Sawmill and remanufacturing operations

Clearwood operates the largest pruned log sawmill in New Zealand. Based in Taupo, the 377,000 square foot

sawmill and warehouse facility is situated on a combined site of 34.4 hectares (including 12.5 hectares of

surplus land). The sawmill currently operates at 75% of capacity, consuming approximately 300,000m

3

of

logs per annum. This throughput can be increased to 3.5-4.0 shifts a day, consuming up to approximately

400,000 m

3

of logs per annum. Clearwood has consistently and successfully run on four shifts previously to

meet market demand. There are nine kilns operating on the site, which are powered by geothermal energy.


Clearwood has recently installed new technology including an optimising edger in September 2015 at a cost

US$4.7 million, and an upgrade to the ripline in the remanufacturing plant in the final quarter of FY16 at a

cost of US$2.3 million. The commissioning of the edger and ripline projects completed all major programmed

capital expenditure at the Taupo site, other than the installation of additional drying kilns (estimated at

approximately US$2 million) which would be required if the site was to move to a four-shift basis, if and when

market demand warranted this investment.


_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

4

Tenon (from National Exotic Forest Description Report and Ministry of Primary Industries)

1.00

1.05

1.10

1.15

1.20

1.25

1.30

1.35

1.40

2015 -20192020 -20242025 -2029

Tonnes per annum



12

3.5.4 Clearwood Financial Performance

The financial performance of Clearwood (excluding corporate and public company overhead costs) for the

financial years ended 30 June 2015 (FY15), 2016 (FY16) and 2017 (FY17) together with the forecast for

Clearwood for the year ending 31 March 2018 (FY18) is summarised below.

CLEARWOOD FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE (US$ MILLIONS)

30 JUNE 31 MARCH

YEAR END 2015 2016 2017 2018F

5


Sales 76.7 81.2 87.9 80.8

Cost of sales (68.5) (66.6) (76.0) (68.8)

Gross profit 8.2 14.6 11.9 12.0

Gross margin % 11% 18% 14% 15%

Overhead expenses (2.8) (2.8) (1.8) (2.7)

EBITDA 5.4 11.8 10.1 9.3

EBITDA margin % 7% 14% 11% 12%

Depreciation and amortisation (1.0) (1.4) (1.6) (1.6)

EBIT 4.4 10.4 8.5 7.7


The following points should be taken into consideration when reviewing the table above:

§ when Clearwood was acquired by TCLP the balance date was changed from 30 June to 31 March;

§ Clearwood’s gross margin increased in FY16 due to a change in product mix towards higher value

products, the impact of the edger and ripline upgrades, and the weaker New Zealand dollar;

§ the gross margin decline in FY17 was largely due:

• to the average exchange rates increasing from NZ$0.67 to over NZ$0.71 per US$, and from

NZ$0.60 to over NZ$0.66 per EURO; and

• log prices remaining relatively constant in US dollar terms for the past 12 months;

§ Clearwood is a US functional currency operation, and the strength of the New Zealand dollar is a key

driver of earnings. A 1 cent movement in the US dollar against the weighted basket of currencies

Clearwood trades with would equate to an approximate US$0.5 million EBITDA impact, ceteris paribus

(assuming no compensating change in New Zealand dollar log prices). A 1 cent movement in the US

dollar against the EURO would equate to an approximate US$0.2 million EBITDA impact, ceteris paribus.

A 1 cent movement in the US dollar against the NZ dollar would equate to an approximate US$0.7

million EBITDA impact ceteris paribus. NZ dollar log prices have historically tended to move with

changes in the US dollar. If this was assumed in the US dollar sensitivity against TCLP’s weighted basket

of currencies, the 1 cent sensitivity would reduce from $0.5 million to $nil;

§ Clearwood has exited its Australian activities and therefore the results shown above exclude the

Australian activities over the past three financial years; and

§ the forecast for the year ending 31 March 2018 is based on the following material assumptions:

• USD: NZD average over the year of 0.710;

• EURO: NZD average over the year of 0.614;

• log purchases of 290,500 tonnes; and

• sawmill production of 168,000 tonnes.



_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

5

Net of General Partner fees of US$0.25m pa and US$0.2m pa of costs previously borne by Tenon corporate.



13

3.5.5 Clearwood Financial Position

The financial position of Clearwood as at 30 September 2017 is summarised below:

CLEARWOOD – FINANCIAL POSITION (US$ MILLIONS)

AS AT 30 SEPTEMBER 2017

Receivables

6.3

Inventory 12.2

Creditors (9.3)

Working capital 9.2

Fixed assets 17.4

Goodwill 18.0

Net operating assets

44.6

Cash and liquid deposits 3.7

Current debt (4.2)

Term debt (19.3)

Net bank debt

(19.8)

Net assets 24.8


The following points should be taken into consideration when reviewing the table above:

§ the TCLP financial position reflects the acquisition of Clearwood for US$55 million in April 2017; and

§ TCLP is required to reduce its 5-year bank acquisition facility by US$4.3 million per annum, until the

principal is reduced to US$15 million. Rubicon believes that these payments will be made and that TCLP

will continue to operate within its financial covenants even if the Proposed Transaction is not approved.

3.5.6 Cash Flows

The cash flows for Clearwood for FY15, FY16, FY17 and FY18F are summarised below:

CLEARWOOD - FREE CASH FLOW (US$ MILLIONS)


30 JUNE 31 MARCH

YEAR END 2015 2016 2017 2018F

EBITDA less finance costs

6

5.4 11.8 10.1 8.2

Less: Capital expenditure (5.9) (3.7) (1.1) (1.3)

Free cash flow (excluding movements in working capital)

(0.5) 8.1 9.0

6.9



_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

6

Financing costs were not attributed to Clearwood in the years 2015-2017.



14

3.6 Profile of ArborGen

3.6.1 Background

ArborGen was established in 2000 and is considered to be a global leader in the commercialisation of

advanced forestry genetics. Through the application of a proprietary technology platform to its extensive

forestry germplasm base (i.e. genetic library), ArborGen develops and produces high-value plantation tree

seedlings that generate an improvement in forestry productivity.


ArborGen has a strong and growing market position, with over 6,000 active customers, including many of the

largest forest land owners and managers in the United States, New Zealand, Brazil and Australia.


ArborGen is the largest global provider of tree seedlings to the commercial forestry industry, currently

producing more than 350 million seedlings per annum. Its products are specifically developed for land owners

and managers supplying the sawtimber, plywood and other structural wood products, pulp and paper, and

industrial markets. ArborGen’s current focus is on loblolly pine, radiata pine and eucalyptus, which are

among the most widely-planted commercial species in the world.


ArborGen has 160 employees and owns or leases 15 nurseries, 16 seed orchards, 32 distribution centres and

three research and development facilities located throughout the Southern United States, New Zealand,

Australia and Brazil.


3.6.2 Intellectual Property

ArborGen’s proprietary ‘tree machine’ technology platform enables it to be the only commercial seedling

company with products spanning a broad technology spectrum. It sells conventional seedling products

developed using traditional plant breeding methods, as well as proprietary next-generation seedling

products developed using plant breeding technologies (including genomics) and clonal propagation. Its next-

generation products are designed to enhance customers’ financial returns by, for example, improving the

growth rates, yields, log quality, uniformity and processing efficiency of trees, and enable it to create and

capture greater value than with conventional products.


ArborGen’s product development pipeline includes improved versions of these next-generation seedling

products as well as transgenic seedling products, which are seedling products with specific genes introduced

to enhance targeted traits. Other than certain eucalyptus products in Brazil, which will utilise transgenic

technology, none of its products on the market or under development require any regulatory review or

approval.


ArborGen believes it has the broadest portfolio of intellectual property in its industry, as well as the largest

and most diverse repositories of germplasm, encompassing more than 40 commercial tree species and

hybrids. It operates an extensive field trial system, with trials (both commercial and field) in multiple

geographic and site specific locations in each of the US, Brazil, New Zealand, Australia, and China. It is using

genomics technology in pine, and its biotechnology capabilities in eucalyptus, to further accelerate and

enhance its tree improvement programs.




15

3.6.3 ArborGen Financial Performance

The financial performance of ArborGen (excluding Rubicon corporate and public company overhead costs)

for the financial years ended 31 March 2017 (FY17) together with the forecast for the year ending 31 March

2018 (FY18) is summarised below:

ARBORGEN FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE (US$ MILLIONS)

7


YEAR END 31 MARCH 2017 2018F

Revenue

44.5 48.0

Cost of sales (29.5) (29.8)

Gross profit

15.0 18.2

Gross margin %

34% 38%

Overhead expenses

(7.8) (8.4)

EBITDA

7.2 9.8

EBITDA margin %

16% 20%

Depreciation and amortisation

(8.7) (8.7)

EBIT

(1.5) 1.1


The following points should be taken into consideration when reviewing the table above:

§ ArborGen is applying a business model similar to that which has been successfully applied in agriculture,

where seed companies have introduced advanced genetics crops that have dramatically improved the

economic per acre as compared to their conventional seed competitors. Through increased pricing,

these seed companies are sharing in the higher value their advanced products create for their

customers;

§ in FY17, ArborGen achieved revenue growth of 21%, due to market growth and the average selling price

increasing in the United States by 7% on volumes of 270 million seedlings;

§ ArborGen’s revenue is forecast to increase by 8% in FY18 and gross margin % is forecast to increase to

38% due to ArborGen focusing on transitioning its customers from conventional seedling products to

its next-generation advanced genetics products, resulting in a higher average sales price;

§ the forecast financial performance for FY18 will be impacted by Hurricanes Irma and Harvey in the

United States. While the full extent of the impact is not known at this stage, ArborGen is currently

forecasting that its EBITDA will improve significantly relative to the prior period. The business

anticipates EBITDA to increase by US$2.6 million due to the improvement in gross margin % and the

increase in revenue;

§ ArborGen plans to increase its market-share in those geographies and markets in which it is already

established – i.e. the US, Brazil, NZ and Australia. It is also investigating expanding into new markets

and geographies, where its products, technology and partners position it for rapid growth; and

§ the recent change in the New Zealand Government has resulted in the announcement of new polices

favourable towards the New Zealand forestry industry and climate change. The details have not been

finalised, but there is potential for the change in policy to have a positive impact on ArborGen’s future

earnings.




_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

7

Numbers shown in this table are as prepared under NZ-IFRS and are pre-restructuring costs. Rubicon advises that the comparable EBITDA numbers under US-

GAAP are US$1.7 million (2017) and US$4.0 million (2018F).



16

3.6.4 ArborGen Financial Position

The financial position of ArborGen as at 30 September 2017 is summarised below:

ARBORGEN FINANCIAL POSITION (US$ MILLIONS)


AS AT 30 SEPTEMBER 2017

Receivables

2.8

Inventory 28.8

Creditors (11.6)

Current lease obligation (0.7)

Working capital

19.3

Fixed assets 44.6

Intellectual property 106.9

Deferred tax liability (6.0)

Net operating assets

164.8

Cash and liquid deposits 8.9

Current Debt (7.7)

Term debt (14.0)

Net bank debt

(12.8)

Lease obligation (11.9)

Net debt

(24.7)

Net assets 140.1


The following points should be taken into consideration when reviewing the table above:

§ ArborGen has a lease agreement for its research, development and headquarters facility at its head

office in South Carolina, United States. The 20 year lease commenced in early 2012 and has 14.5 years

remaining. The lease cash costs are US$1.4 million per annum. This lease is treated as a finance lease

under NZ-IFRS, which results in the property and the lease liability being capitalised on the balance

sheet. The net assets do not change as the accounting policy results in a neutral outcome (i.e. the assets

are offset by the liability);

§ all of ArborGen’s existing financers have continued to provide funding lines post Rubicon’s acquisition

of the 66.66% of ArborGen that it did not already own. Cash and liquid deposits includes a US$6.0 million

deposit with Synovus Bank to secure ArborGen’s working capital facility; and

§ ArborGen’s intellectual property (US$107 million) reflects the value of its:

• industry-leading germplasm, which is the output of more than (in aggregate) 100 years of tree

improvement activity undertaken by ArborGen’s predecessor partner companies (Fletcher

Challenge, International Paper, and WestRock);

• ArborGen’s proprietary ‘tree machine’ platform;

• extensive database of loblolly, radiata, and eucalyptus trials;

• varietal and transgenic technology;

• genomics platform; and

• patent portfolio.



17

3.6.5 ArborGen Cash Flows

The cash flows for ArborGen for FY18F is summarised below:

ARBORGEN - FREE CASH FLOW (US$ MILLIONS)

YEAR END 31 MARCH 2018F

EBITDA less finance costs

7.6

Less: capital expenditure (1.9)

Less: research and development (5.8)

Free cash flow (excluding movements in working capital) (0.1)


3.7 Rubicon’s Ownership

As of the date of this report, Rubicon had 487,908,343 shares on issue, held by approximately 6,190

shareholders. Rubicon’s top shareholders are shown below:

RUBICON – TOP SHAREHOLDERS AS AT 14 DECEMBER 2017

SHAREHOLDER SHARES (MILLIONS) % TOTAL

Knott Partners LP (David Knott and associates) 137.7 28.2%

Libra Fund LP (Ranjan Tandon) 86.1 17.7%

Perry Corporation 39.3 8.0%

Third Avenue Management LLC 38.2 7.8%

Sandell Asset Management 22.0 4.5%

Top 5 Shareholders 323.3 66.3%

Other Shareholders 164.6 33.7%

Total 487.9 100.0%


On 29 June 2017, in order to strengthen its balance sheet and to assist with the funding of ArborGen, Rubicon

issued 78.9 shares via share placement to raise US$12.5 million (NZ$17.2 million). The participants in the

share placement were Libra and Knott, which acquired 56.78 and 22.08 million shares respectively. The top

5 shareholders own 66% of the shares on issue.


3.8 Rubicon’s Share Price Performance

The share price and trading volume history of Rubicon shares since the share placement on 29 June 2017 is

shown below:

SHARE PRICE PERFORMANCE OF RUBICON SHARES AND VOLUME TRADED SINCE 30 JUNE 2017


Rubicon is a thinly traded share. As at 13 December 2017 Rubicon had a market capitalisation of $95.1

million.

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

8000

9000

10000

$0.00

$0.05

$0.10

$0.15

$0.20

$0.25

Jul-2017 Aug-2017 Sep-2017

Oct-2017

Nov-2017 Dec-2017

Volume (000s)

Price

Volume Price



18

4 Valuation of Tenon Clearwood Limited Partnership

4.1 Summary

Grant Samuel’s valuation of TCLP is outlined below:

VALUATION SUMMARY TCLP (US$ MILLIONS)

LOW HIGH

TCLP Enterprise value 51.3 61.5

Less estimated net debt as at 31 December 2017 (21.0) (21.0)

Value Equity (US$) 30.3 40.5

Rubicon’s shareholding in TCLP 44.88% 44.88%

Value of Rubicon’s shareholding 13.6 18.2


Grant Samuel makes the following observations regarding the valuation of TCLP:

§ Grant Samuel has valued Rubicon’s share of TCLP by estimating the full underlying value and multiplying

the result by Rubicon’s shareholding of 44.88%;

§ the TCLP valuation has been estimated on the basis of fair market value as a going concern, defined as

the estimated price that could be realised in an open market over a reasonable period of time, assuming

that potential buyers have full information. The valuation of TCLP is appropriate for the acquisition of

the company as a whole and accordingly incorporates a premium for control;

§ the TCLP partnership structure contains standard pre-emptive provisions, which restricts the

marketability of partner shareholdings;

§ the valuation is based on TCLP management’s latest EBITDA forecast for FY18 adjusted to current

exchange rates as outlined in section 4.2 below;

§ the New Zealand dollar has weakened recently against the US dollar and the Euro and this is the area

where TCLP’s greatest sensitivity lies. A weakening New Zealand dollar (all other things held constant)

results in higher earnings for TCLP due to a large proportion of the cost base being denominated in New

Zealand dollars and the majority of the revenue is denominated in foreign currencies;

§ TCLP exhibited improved performance in FY16 and FY17 when compared with prior years, in part due

to the recovery in US housing sector activity, the development of the European market for Clearwood’s

products, the benefit from the capital programme completed at the Taupo mill in 2016, and a lower

$NZ:US exchange rate in part offset by higher log prices in NZ dollars. Although some orders from both

the US and Europe have softened recently, this is believed to be temporary;

§ Clearwood has a broad and balanced customer portfolio with limited reliance on any single customer;

§ maintenance capital expenditure will be at or below depreciation for a number of years following the

completion of the recent capital expenditure programme at the Taupo mill; and

§ TCLP’s unique long length wide clear products are currently in healthy demand globally.



19

4.2 Earnings for Valuation

The forecast EBITDA for the year ending 31 March 2018 is US$9.3 million. For the purposes of the valuation

Grant Samuel has applied current exchange rates to the forecast. Although the current FX rates are lower

than the average for the past 12 months, they have been very volatile over the last quarter in particular.

However, the overall trend has been a weakening NZ dollar against Clearwood’s key currencies. These

changes to the underlying assumptions increases the forecast EBITDA for the year ending 31 March 2018 to

US$10.25 million. The earnings for valuation is shown below:

TCLP EARNINGS FOR VALUATION (US$000)


YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2017 31 MARCH 2018F

Sales 87.9 81.5

Cost of sales (76.0) (68.7)

Gross profit 11.9 12.8

Gross margin % 14% 16%

Overhead expenses (1.8) (2.5)

EBITDA 10.1 10.3

Depreciation and amortisation (1.6) (1.6)

EBIT 8.5 8.7


The earnings for valuation for the year ending 31 March 2018 is based on the following material assumptions:

§ USD: NZD exchange rate average over the year of 0.685;

§ EURO: NZD exchange rate average over the year of 0.585;

§ log purchases of 290,500 tonnes; and

§ sawmill production of 168,000 tonnes.


4.3 Preferred Methodology

Grant Samuel’s valuation of TCLP has been estimated on the basis of fair market value as a going concern,

defined as the estimated price that could be realised in an open market over a reasonable period of time

assuming that potential buyers have full information.


The most reliable evidence as to the value of a business is the price at which the business or a comparable

business has been bought and sold in an arm’s length transaction. In the absence of direct market evidence

of value, estimates of value are made using methodologies that infer value from other available evidence.


There are four primary valuation methodologies commonly used for valuing businesses:

§ capitalisation of earnings or cash flows;

§ discounting of projected cash flows;

§ industry rules of thumb; and

§ estimation of the aggregate proceeds from an orderly realisation of assets.


Each of these valuation methodologies has application in different circumstances. The primary criterion for

determining which methodology is appropriate is the actual practice adopted by purchasers of the type of

business involved. A detailed description of each of these methodologies is outlined at Appendix 4.




20

Preferred Approach

Grant Samuel has adopted the capitalisation of earnings methodology to determine a value range for TCLP.

The primary reasons why the capitalisation of earnings method has been chosen are:

§ multiples of earnings for comparable transactions are centred around a reasonably tight band; and

§ discounted cash flow analysis relies on a detailed forecast of future earnings and cash flows. TCLP’s

management do not prepare long term forecasts. A discounted cash flow valuation is often used to cross

check against the capitalisation of earnings methodology. As there were no long-term forecasts this was

not possible.


4.4 Earnings Multiple Analysis

4.4.1 Sharemarket Evidence

The valuation of Clearwood has been considered in the context of the multiples implied by the share market

ratings of listed companies with operations in the timber processing industry:

SHARE MARKET RATINGS OF SELECTED LISTED COMPANIES

8


COMPANY

MARKET

CAP

(MILLIONS)

EBITDA MULTIPLE

9


(TIMES)

EBIT MULTIPLE

10


(TIMES)

HISTORIC

FORECAST

(1)

FORECAST

(2)

HISTORIC

FORECAST

(1)

FORECAST

(2)

Canfor Corporation CA$3,237

6.8 5.2 5.6 12.6 8.6 8.4

Conifex Timber Inc. CA$140

8.5 6.7 5.3 15.7 10.8 9.1

Interfor Corporation CA$1,422

8.0 6.1 6.1 18.0 12.2 12.1

Lousiana Pacific Corporation US$3,922

10.0 5.5 6.1 16.9 6.9 7.7

West Fraser Timber Co Ltd CA$5,967

9.6 6.6 6.6 13.4 8.8 8.4

Western Forest Products Inc. CA$994

6.3 6.3 5.7 8.4 9.6 7.4

Average

8.2 6.1 5.9 14.2 9.5 8.8

Median

8.2 6.2 5.9 14.5 9.2 8.4

Source: Grant Samuel analysis

11



The following points are relevant when considering the table above:

§ all of the companies have a 31 December financial year end. Forecast (1) therefore represents the

financial year ending 31 December 2017 and Forecast (2) represents the financial year ending 31

December 2018;

§ detailed descriptions of each company are provided in Appendix 2. There are key differences between

the operations and scale of the comparable companies when compared with Clearwood. With the

exception of Conifex all of the listed timber processing companies are significantly larger than Tenon’s

Clearwood activities. Clearwood is smaller than any of the companies shown in the table, with market

capitalisations of West Fraser and Canfor being approximately 30 and 60 times larger respectively of

Clearwood’s implied trading value and revenues are also materially larger than Clearwood;

§ the implied multiples have been calculated based on closing share prices as at 8 December 2017. The

share prices do not include a premium for control;

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

8


The companies selected have a variety of year ends. The financial information presented in the Historic column corresponds to the most recent actual

annual result. The forecast column corresponds to the forecast for the subsequent year.

9


Represents gross capitalisation (that is, the sum of the market capitalisation adjusted for minorities, plus borrowings less cash as at the latest balance

date) divided by EBIT.

10


Represents gross capitalisation (that is, the sum of the market capitalisation adjusted for minorities, plus borrowings less cash as at the latest balance

date) divided by EBITDA.

11


Grant Samuel analysis based on company announcements and, in the absence of company published financial forecasts, brokers’ reports. Where

company financial forecasts are not available, the median of the financial forecasts prepared by a range of brokers has generally been used to derive

relevant forecast value parameters. The source, date and number of broker reports utilised for each company depends on analyst coverage, availability

and recent corporate activity.



21

§ none of the listed timber processing companies operate primarily in the conversion and marketing of

clear pruned resource, and none has the European focus that Clearwood has. Also, none of the

companies have the same exposure to movements in the NZD: USD that Clearwood does. However,

the multiples implied by the share prices of listed timber processing companies does provide a

framework within which to assess the value of Clearwood; and

§ listed timber processing companies are trading within a band of 5.2 to 6.7 times forecast EBITDA for the

year ending 31 December 2017, with an average of 6.1 times. The implied multiples of forecast EBITDA

are depicted below:

IMPLIED MULTIPLES OF FORECAST EBITDA OF LISTED TIMBER PROCESSING COMPANIES


4.4.2 Transaction Evidence – Timber Processing Businesses

The valuation of TCLP has been considered having regard to the earnings multiples implied by the prices at

which broadly comparable companies and businesses have changed hands. The table below contains analysis

of the earnings multiples implied by the prices of recent acquisitions of timber processing businesses:


RECENT TIMBER PROCESSING TRANSACTIONS – MULTIPLES (TIMES)

DATE TARGET ACQUIRER IMPLIED EV ($M)

HISTROICAL IMPLIED

EV/EBITDA

MULTIPLES

Sep-15 Anthony Forest Products Canfor US$94 5.8

Mar-15 Simpson Lumber Company Interfor US$125 5.2

Apr-17 Tenon Clearwood TCLP US$55 5.3

Average 5.3

Source: Grant Samuel analysis, Capital IQ.


Larger businesses generally, but not always, tend to transact at higher multiples reflecting more robust and

diversified earnings, stronger market positions and often enhanced financial and management disciplines,

management team depth and systems. Brief descriptions of the transactions are set out below in Appendix

1.




5.2

5.5

5.5

6.1

6.6 6.6

6.7

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Canfor

Corporation

Lousiana

Pacific

Corporation

TCLP

Valuation

-

Midpoint

Interfor

Corporation

Western

Forest

Products Inc.

West Fraser

Timber Co

Ltd

Conifex

Timber Inc.

Forecast EBITDA Multiples



22

4.4.3 Implied Multiples – TCLP

Grant Samuel’s valuation of TCLP implies the following multiples:

TCLP - IMPLIED MULTIPLES

VALUATION RANGE

EARNINGS (US$M) LOW HIGH

Multiple of FY17 EBITDA (Year to 30 June 2017)

10.1 5.1 6.1

Multiple of FY18F EBITDA (Year to 31 March 2018) 10.3 5.0 6.0

Multiple of FY17 EBIT (Year to 30 June 2017) 8.5 6.0 7.2

Multiple of FY18F EBIT (Year to 31 March 2018) 8.7 5.9 7.1


The evidence from the share prices of comparable listed companies and the prices of transaction involving

comparable business or assets is consistent with the multiples implied by Grant Samuel’s valuation of TCLP.



23

5 Merits of the Proposed Transaction

5.1 Evaluation and Summary of the Proposed Transaction

In Grant Samuel’s opinion, the full underlying enterprise value of TCLP is in the range of US$51.3 – US$61.5

million. Rubicon’s pro rata share of the full underlying value is US$13.6 – US$18.2 million. The

consideration for the Proposed Transaction is forecast to be approximately US$15.3 million which is within

Grant Samuel’s assessed range of Rubicon’s 44.88% share of TCLP’s full underlying value.


5.2 Evaluation of the Sale Price and Terms of the Proposed Transaction

Grant Samuel has been requested to provide an opinion in accordance with Listing Rule 1.7.2 of the NZX

Listing Rules as to whether the price and terms of the Proposed Sale of TCLP to the Prospective Purchasers

are “fair” to Rubicon shareholders other than the purchasers of Rubicon’s shares of TCLP who are also

shareholders in Rubicon.


The Prospective Acquirers have offered to acquire Rubicon’s share of equity for an estimated US$15.3 million,

representing the cost of Rubicon’s investment in TCLP in April 2017, plus Rubicon’s share of the net cash

generated by TCLP in the period from 28 April 2017 through to 31 December 2017, less Rubicon’s share of a

dividend to be paid in December 2017

12

. The Prospective Acquirers’ offer is within Grant Samuel’s valuation

of Rubicon’s share of the equity of US$13.6 – US$18.2 million.

COMPARISON OF THE PROPOSED TRANSACTION PRICE WITH GRANT SAMUEL’S VALUATION RANGE


Rubicon is being offered its pro rata share of the full underlying value. No discount is being applied to the

offer price, for the Rubicon shareholding, which in these circumstances Grant Samuel believes is appropriate

given all of the shareholders, including Rubicon paid that price in April 2017.


Accordingly, in Grant Samuel’s opinion, for the purpose of Listing Rule 1.7.2 of the NZX Listing Rules the price

and terms of the Sale of Rubicon’s interest in TCLP are “fair” to Rubicon shareholders (other than Knott

Partners LP and Libra Funds LP). This opinion is expressed only for the benefit of the shareholders of Rubicon

shareholders not associated with TCLP.


5.3 Merits of the Proposed Transaction

§ the sale of the minority interest in TCLP will result in Rubicon being a pure play forestry genetics

company. With Rubicon now owning 100% of ArborGen and it being the only investment of Rubicon, it

will provide investors with a high degree of transparency. These two factors may enhance the

attractiveness of the shares to new investors. This observation is tempered by the fact that the five

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

12

The net debt position will not be known until 10 January 2018, however Rubicon’s share of the reduction in debt through to 31 December is currently estimated

to be US$1.1 million.

13.6

15.3

18.2

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

Grant

Samuel

-

Low

Valuation

Value of the

Proposed

Transaction

Grant

Samuel

-

High

Valuation

Equity Value ($millons)



24

largest shareholders, collectively hold 66% of the shares on issue, severely limiting liquidity and limiting

the attractiveness to otherwise likely institutional investors;

§ if the Proposed Transaction is approved, annual cost savings are estimated to be up to US$2.0 million.

If the Proposed Transaction is not approved cost savings of this magnitude will not be able to be

realised;

§ Rubicon needs to make two final deferred-settlement payments that total US$15 million to complete

the purchase of ArborGen. In addition, it also needs to repay US$6 million of subordinated debt notes.

The cash on hand combined with the proceeds of the sale of TCLP will enable Rubicon to meet all of

these payments. If the Proposed Transaction is not approved then Rubicon will need to find another

source of funding in order to meet these payments;

§ the sale of TCLP will remove exposure to the more volatile earnings of Clearwood which suffers from

the vagaries of both fluctuating demand in the United States, movements in exchange rates and log

prices;

§ ArborGen and Clearwood operate independently from one another and there is no benefit to either

from having a common shareholder;

§ if the Proposed Transaction is not approved it is likely that Rubicon will need to find another source of

funding in order to meet the outstanding US$15 million in deferred settlement payments (US$5 million

on 31 December 2017, and US$10 million on 30 June 2018) relating to the ArborGen acquisition made

earlier this year, and the repayment of the outstanding US$6 million subordinated note on 1 July 2018;

§ as at 13 December 2017 Rubicon had a market capitalisation of NZ$95.1 million. The combined value

of the Proposed Transaction and the price paid for the remaining 66.66% of the shares it did not own in

ArborGen implies a market capitalisation that is broadly in line with its current market value. The price

at which the shares will ultimately trade on-market, if the Proposed Transaction is approved, will

depend on a range of factors, including New Zealand and global equity market conditions;

§ Rubicon listed on 26 March 2001 and over the last 16 years it has not paid a dividend. The Proposed

Transaction is unlikely to impact dividends in the immediate future; and

§ Knott, Libra and their associates hold 45.9% of Rubicon’s shares and are entitled to vote on the part of

the resolution that requires the approval by 50% of those shareholders eligible to vote and voting as

the Proposed Transaction may change the essential nature of Rubicon’s business.


5.4 The likelihood of an alternative offer

Rubicon’s Independent Committee did not deem it necessary to run a third party sales process in relation to

its interest in TCLP. The rationale for that decision was based on the fact that Tenon had only earlier this

year been through an exhaustive 18-month sales process for the Clearwood business supported by an

international investment bank, which concluded in the sale to TCLP provided the best value outcome.


The Independent Directors did not believe there was any benefit to Rubicon shareholders (only considerable

cost and time delay) to be derived from running a sales process for a 44.88% shareholding.


The pre-emptive rights contained in the TCLP Partnership Agreement also constrain the ability of Rubicon to

freely sell its shareholding in TCLP. Under the TCLP Partnership Agreement, if Rubicon wishes to sell its shares

to any other party other than the existing TCLP partners it must first offer its shares on the same terms to

the existing TCLP partners and this offer must remain open for a period of 60 days.


Rubicon has also entered into an exclusivity agreement with the Prospective Purchasers. The prospects of

an alternative offer are low when taking into account the sales process run earlier in the year, the existing

pre-emptive rights and the exclusivity agreement.



25

5.5 Evaluation on the impact of Rubicon’s earnings and financial position

Financial analysis comparing the status quo (i.e. the Proposed Transaction is not approved and Rubicon

continues to hold 44.88% of TCLP) with the pro forma financials if the Proposed Transaction is approved is

outlined below:

FINANCIAL EVALUATION OF THE IMPACT OF THE PROPOSED TRANSACTION (US$ MILLIONS)

STATUS QUO

IF THE PROPOSED

TRANSACTION IS

APPROVED

13


Forecast Financial Performance for 12 months to 31 March 2018

Revenue

128.8 48.0

EBITDA (adjusted for depreciation and interest related to property) 14.7 7.4

14


EBIT (adjusted for depreciation and interest related to property) 5.2 (0.5)

Net Interest (excluding property leases) (3.1) (0.3)

Net operating cash flow

3.4 0.2

Financial Position as at 30 September 2017


Net tangible operating assets

33.2 42.4

Net debt (excluding property lease)

(37.8) (2.0)

Financial leverage ratios

15



Leverage ratio (net debt / EBITDA)

3.9 0.3

Interest cover (EBITDA / net interest)

3.8 23.5

Interest cover (EBIT / net interest)

0.4 (1.6)


The following points should be taken into consideration when reviewing the table above:

§ the pro forma financial performance and financial position included in the table above is on a

consolidated basis and assumes Tenon has been liquidated, the two final ArborGen acquisition

deferred-settlement payments totalling US$15 million, and the US$6 million repayment of

subordinated debt notes have each been made;

§ if the Proposed Transaction is approved the net bank debt is forecast to decrease from US$37 million

to US$2 million. As at 30 September 2017 TCLP had net debt of US$20 million. If the investment in

TCLP is sold, Rubicon receives approximately US$15.3 million for its 44.88% shareholding, and the net

debt liability is left in TCLP;

§ EBIT

13

is assumed to increase by US$2.0 million if the Proposed Transaction proceeds, due to cost

savings assumed;

§ the EBTIDA, EBIT and net interest has been adjusted to remove the impact of the accounting treatment

of the ArborGen property lease as a finances lease; and

§ if the Proposed Transaction is approved Rubicon’s financial leverage ratios improve, with the exception

being its Interest cover ratio (EBIT/ Net interest). The requirement to raise further capital is largely

eliminated, given the Company’s expectation that ArborGen is forecasting positive net operating cash

flows (after interest payments) beginning the next financial year and onwards.


_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

13

Pre restructuring costs, which have not yet been determined, pending a Board decision on the final operating structure and model.

14

This includes head office costs of US$0.7 million.

15

Assumes 44.88% of TCLP’s debt and earnings



26

5.6 Alternatives to the Proposed Transaction

The only real alternative is to not sell the 44.88% shareholding in TCLP. TCLP is a good investment, despite it

being exposed to number of factors which causes volatility in its earnings. These include:

§ the level of activity in the various sectors of the economies in which it competes, particularly in New

Zealand, Europe, and North America;

§ fluctuations in industrial output;

§ commercial and residential construction activity;

§ capital availability and interest rates;

§ the housing markets (including additions to existing homes, repairs and new builds); and

§ relative exchange rates (particularly EURO and US$).


In Grant Samuel’s opinion, if Rubicon wanted to keep its shareholding in TCLP it is likely that it will need more

capital to deleverage the company.


Rubicon made a US$12.5 million shareholder placement in June 2017 to its two largest shareholders, Libra

and Knott, in connection with its move to 100% ownership of ArborGen. Without the support of two

shareholders who control 45.9% of the shares in Rubicon, any capital raising could prove to be problematic.


5.7 The timing and circumstances surrounding the Proposed Transaction

The Tenon Board ran two separate sales processes over the past 24 months to sell each of its US distribution

activities and its Clearwood operations. Following the US business’ sale to Blue Wolf, Tenon then sold

Clearwood to TCLP in April 2017. After the 18-month sales process for Clearwood, the best offer received

was from TCLP. Rubicon never intended to be a long term holder of its shares in Clearwood but it participated

as a limited partner in the consortium in order to allow the wind-down and liquidation of Tenon to occur.

The Proposed Transaction will enable Rubicon to sell its shares in TCLP, thereby achieving the outcome

Rubicon is seeking, which is to eliminate debt of Rubicon Limited, and become a listed entity that has a single

focused asset, ArborGen.


5.8 Fairness of the Proposed Transaction for the purposes of the NZX Listing Rules

In Grant Samuel’s opinion, based on the analysis of the merits outlined above, the terms of the Proposed

Transaction are fair and reasonable to the shareholders of Rubicon not associated with Knott and Libra. In

Grant Samuel’s opinion, the information to be provided by Rubicon to its shareholders is sufficient to enable

holders of those shares to understand all the relevant factors and make an informed decision as to the sale

of Rubicon’s interest in TCLP. The grounds for Grant Samuel’s opinion are set out in this Report. Grant

Samuel has obtained all information which it believes desirable for the purposes of preparing this report,

including all relevant information which is or should have been known by any Director of Rubicon and made

available to the Directors.


5.9 Acceptance or Rejection of the Proposed Transaction

Acceptance or rejection of the Proposed Transaction is a matter for individual shareholders based on their

own view as to value and future market conditions, risk profile, liquidity preference, portfolio strategy, tax

position and other factors. In particular, taxation consequences will vary widely across shareholders.

Shareholders will need to consider these consequences and, if appropriate, consult their own professional

adviser(s).



GRANT SAMUEL & ASSOCIATES LIMITED

14 December 2017



27

Appendix 1 Recent Transaction Evidence

Transactions involving Building Product Distributors:

Anthony Forest Products / Canfor

In October 2015, Canfor acquired Anthony Forest Products (AFP) for US$94 million. AFP is engaged in the

integrated forest products business offering its products through dealers in the United States and

internationally. The company operates six facilities producing lumber, engineered wood and wood chips in

Southern United States. Canfor identified AFP as a strategic acquisition, in particular to grow its presence in

the southern United Sates. The purchase price implied a multiple of 5.8 times EBITDA.


Simpson Lumber Company / Interfor

In March 2015, Interfor acquired four sawmills from Simpson Lumber Company for US$125 million. The

transaction increased Interfor’s annual lumber production capacity by 30% and was highlighted as important

to Interfor's growth strategy. As a result of the acquisition, two-thirds of Interfor's total annual capacity is

now spread throughout the North and South of the US. The purchase price implied a multiple of 5.2 times

EBITDA.


Tenon / TCLP

In April 2017, TCLP acquired 100.0% of Tenon Clearwood. The purchase price of US$55 million (debt free)

implied a multiple of 5.3 times EBITDA.




28

Appendix 2 Comparable Listed Companies

The following table provides a high level comparison of each of the companies to Clearwood:

COMPARISON OF LISTED TIMBER PROCESSING BUSINESSES (CA$ UNLESS SPECIFIED OTHERWISE)


CANFOR

CORPORATION

CONIFEX

TIMBER INC.

INTERFOR

CORPORATION

WEST FRASER

TIMBER CO

WESTERN

FOREST

PRODUCTS

INC.

CLEARWOOD

Processing

capacity (bbf)

5.8 0.525 3.0 6.3 1.1 220m3 (000)

# of mills 23 2 14 40 9 1

# of employees 6,260 600 2,860 7,800 2,080 275

Profitability

FY17F Revenue

(CA$b)

4.583 0.459 1.934 5.085 1.156 US$87.9m

FY17 EBITDA

(CA$b)

0.680 0.043 0.258 0.674 0.146 US$10.1m

EBITDA margin % 14.8% 9.3% 13.3% 19.2% 12.7% 11.5%

The following comments are relevant when considering the table above:

§ West Fraser Timber Company Limited (West Fraser) is the largest timber processing company in North

America, the largest plywood producer in Canada and the third largest pulp producer in Canada. The

company has 28 timber mills, 7 panel mills and 5 pulp & paper mills. Approximately two thirds of West

Fraser’s revenue are derived from lumber products with the remainder coming from pulp & paper and

wood panels. Approximately 80% of revenue is generated in North America and 20% from China and

other Asian countries;

§ Canfor Corporation Limited (Canfor) is the third largest timber processing company in North America

with 23 sawmills, four energy plants, three engineered product facilities and four pulp mills.

Approximately two thirds of its revenue are generated in North America with the remaining third of

revenue from Asia (primarily China and Japan). Canfor’s pulp and paper segment business is one of the

largest producers of softwood kraft pulp in Canada;

§ Interfor Corporation (Interfor) is the fourth largest timber processing company in North America with

14 sawmills (9 in the US and 5 in British Colombia). Two-thirds of the company’s processing capacity is

located in the US (predominantly in the Southern states). Approximately 80% of Interfor’s products are

commodity grade. 80% of Interfor’s sales are made in North America with key export markets for the

remaining 20% being Japan and China;

§ Western Forest Products Inc. (Western) is the eleventh largest timber processing company in North

America with nine sawmills. Approximately 65% of Western’s revenue is from the North American

market with Japan, China, other Asian countries and Europe making up the remaining 35%; and

§ Conifex Timber Inc. (Conifex) is much smaller than the other listed North American timber processing

companies with market capitalisation of CA$140 million.







29

Appendix 3 Overview of the New Zealand Timber Processing Industry

Introduction

The timber industry is an integral part of the New Zealand economy contributing an annual gross income of

around $5 billion (3% of New Zealand's GDP) and directly employing approximately 20,000 people. Wood

products are New Zealand's third largest export earner (behind dairy and meat) with New Zealand sawmills

exporting approximately 2 million cubic metres per annum. New Zealand’s largest export markets are China,

Australia and the US. New Zealand timber also has a strong presence throughout Asia, the Middle East,

Europe and the Pacific.


Radiata Pine

New Zealand timber primarily comes from renewable plantation forests that are managed on a sustainable

basis with the predominant species being Radiata Pine. Radiata is considered a globally unique product and

is one of the most versatile softwoods with superior machining and finishing qualities. Furthermore, its

uniform appearance means that it is an easy wood to paint and stain, adding to its popularity.


Due to New Zealand’s unique growing conditions and pruning regime, New Zealand Radiata produces wide,

long length clear fibre (i.e. knot free), which can be converted into high-value clear finished products, making

them highly desirable in the US NHC and Pro-dealer markets.


The pruning regime in New Zealand sees the trees pruned to 5-8 metres each year up to the age of 10. As a

result of this process, clear wood forms around the knots where the branches have been pruned and creates

a log consisting of straight-grained clear wood suitable for high-value appearance applications. Although the

pruned part of the tree consists of only approximately 15% of the height of the full-grown pine tree, it

typically equates to approximately 50% of the total value.

16



New Zealand Timber Supply

The Central North Island is the largest forest area in New Zealand.

NZ PLANTED FOREST AND STANDING VOLUME


PLANTED HECTARES (000) STANDING VOLUME (MILLION M

3

)

Northland 186 58

Central North Island 568 182

East Coast 156 54

Hawkes Bay 134 42

Southern North Island 160 54

Marlborough 167 42

West Coast 31 6

Canterbury 97 21

Otago Southland 206 41

Total NZ 1,705 500


_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

16

Source: NZ Ministry of Primary Industries



30

Appendix 4 Valuation Methodology Descriptions

Capitalisation of Earnings

Capitalisation of earnings or cash flows is most appropriate for businesses with a substantial operating history

and a consistent earnings trend that is sufficiently stable to be indicative of ongoing earnings potential. This

methodology is not particularly suitable for start-up businesses, businesses with an erratic earnings pattern

or businesses that have unusual expenditure requirements. This methodology involves capitalising the

earnings or cash flows of a business at a multiple that reflects the risks of the business and the stream of

income that it generates. These multiples can be applied to a number of different earnings or cash flow

measures including EBITDA, EBITA, EBIT or net profit after tax. These are referred to respectively as EBITDA

multiples, EBITA multiples, EBIT multiples and price earnings multiples. Price earnings multiples are

commonly used in the context of the share market. EBITDA, EBITA and EBIT multiples are more commonly

used in valuing whole businesses for acquisition purposes where gearing is in the control of the acquirer.


Where an ongoing business with relatively stable and predictable earnings is being valued Grant Samuel uses

capitalised earnings or operating cash flows as a primary reference point. Application of this valuation

methodology involves:

§ estimation of earnings or cash flow levels that a purchaser would utilise for valuation purposes having

regard to historical and forecast operating results, non-recurring items of income and expenditure and

known factors likely to impact on operating performance; and

§ consideration of an appropriate capitalisation multiple having regard to the market rating of comparable

businesses, the extent and nature of competition, the time period of earnings used, the quality of

earnings, growth prospects and relative business risk.

The choice between the parameters is usually not critical and should give a similar result. All are commonly

used in the valuation of industrial businesses. EBITDA can be preferable if depreciation or non-cash charges

distort earnings or make comparisons between companies difficult but care needs to be exercised to ensure

that proper account is taken of factors such as the level of capital expenditure needed for the business and

whether or not any amortisation costs also relate to ongoing cash costs. EBITA avoids the distortions of

goodwill amortisation. EBIT can better adjust for differences in relative capital intensity.


Determination of the appropriate earnings multiple is usually the most judgemental element of a valuation.

Definitive or even indicative offers for a particular asset or business can provide the most reliable support for

selection of an appropriate earnings multiple. In the absence of meaningful offers, it is necessary to infer the

appropriate multiple from other evidence.


The usual approach is to determine the multiple that other buyers have been prepared to pay for similar

businesses in the recent past. However, each transaction will be the product of a unique combination of

factors. A pattern may emerge from transactions involving similar businesses with sales typically taking place

at prices corresponding to earnings multiples within a particular range. This range will generally reflect the

growth prospects and risks of those businesses. Mature, low growth businesses will, in the absence of other

factors, attract lower multiples than those businesses with potential for significant growth in earnings.


An alternative approach used in valuing businesses is to review the multiples at which shares in listed

companies in the same industry sector trade on the share market. This gives an indication of the price levels

at which portfolio investors are prepared to invest in these businesses. Share prices reflect trades in small

parcels of shares (portfolio interests) rather than whole companies and it is necessary to adjust for this factor.


The analysis of comparable transactions and share market prices for comparable companies will not always

lead to an obvious conclusion as to which multiple or range of multiples will apply. There will often be a wide

spread of multiples and the application of judgement becomes critical. Moreover, it is necessary to consider

the particular attributes of the business being valued and decide whether it warrants a higher or lower

multiple than the comparable companies. This assessment is essentially a judgement.



31

Discounted Cash Flow

Discounting of projected cash flows has a strong theoretical basis. It is the most commonly used method for

valuation in a number of industries, and for the valuation of start-up projects where earnings during the first

few years can be negative. DCF valuations involve calculating the net present value of projected cash flows.

This methodology is able to explicitly capture the effect of a turnaround in the business, the ramp up to

maturity or significant changes expected in capital expenditure patterns. The cash flows are discounted using

a discount rate, which reflects the risk associated with the cash flow stream. Considerable judgement is

required in estimating future cash flows and it is generally necessary to place great reliance on medium to

long-term projections prepared by management. The discount rate is also not an observable number and

must be inferred from other data (usually only historical). None of this data is particularly reliable so

estimates of the discount rate necessity involve a substantial element of judgment. In addition, even where

cash flow forecasts are available the terminal or continuing value is usually a high proportion of value.

Accordingly, the multiple used in assessing this terminal value becomes the critical determinant in the

valuation (i.e. it is a “de facto” cash flow capitalisation valuation). The net present value is typically extremely

sensitive to relatively small changes in underlying assumptions, few of which are capable of being predicted

with accuracy, particularly beyond the first two or three years. The arbitrary assumptions that need to be

made and the width of any value range mean the results are often not meaningful or reliable.

Notwithstanding these limitations, DCF valuations are commonly used and can at least play a role in providing

a check on alternative methodologies, not least because explicit and relatively detailed assumptions need to

be made as to the expected future performance of the business operations.

Realisation of Assets

Valuations based on an estimate of the aggregate proceeds from an orderly realisation of assets are

commonly applied to businesses that are not going concerns. They effectively reflect liquidation values and

typically attribute no value to any goodwill associated with ongoing trading. Such an approach is not

appropriate in Rubicon’s case.

Industry Rules of Thumb

Industry rules of thumb are commonly used in some industries. These are generally used by a valuer as a

“cross check” of the result determined by a capitalised earnings valuation or by discounting cash flows, but

in some industries rules of thumb can be the primary basis on which buyers determine prices. Grant Samuel

is not aware of any commonly used rules of thumb that would be appropriate to value TCLP. In any event, it

should be recognised that rules of thumb are usually relatively crude and prone to misinterpretation.





32

Appendix 5 Interpretation of Multiples

Earnings multiples are normally benchmarked against two primary sets of reference points:

§ the multiples implied by the share prices of listed peer group companies; and

§ the multiples implied by the prices paid in acquisitions of other companies in the same industry.

In interpreting and evaluating such data it is necessary to recognise that:

§ multiples based on listed company share prices do not include a premium for control and are therefore

often (but not always) less than multiples that would apply to acquisitions of controlling interests in

similar companies. However, while the premium paid to obtain control in takeovers is observable

(typically in the range 20-35%) it is inappropriate to simply add a premium to listed multiples. The

premium for control is an outcome of the valuation process, not a determinant of value. Premiums are

paid for reasons that vary from case to case and may be substantial due to synergy or other benefits

available to the acquirer. In other situations premiums may be minimal or even zero. There are

transactions where no corporate buyer is prepared to pay a price in excess of the prices paid by share

market investors;

§ acquisition multiples from comparable transactions are therefore usually seen as a better guide when

valuing 100% of a business but the data tends to be less transparent and information on forecast earnings

is often unavailable;

§ the analysis will give a range of outcomes from which averages or medians can be determined but it is

not appropriate to simply apply such measures to the company being valued. The most important part

of valuation is to evaluate the attributes of the specific company being valued and to distinguish it from

its peers so as to form a judgement as to where on the spectrum it belongs;

§ acquisition multiples are a product of the economic and other circumstances at the time of the

transaction. However, each transaction will be the product of a unique combination of factors, including:

• economic factors (e.g. economic growth, inflation, interest rates) affecting the markets in which the

company operates;

• strategic attractions of the business – its particular strengths and weaknesses, market position of

the business, strength of competition and barriers to entry;

• the company’s own performance and growth trajectory;

• rationalisation or synergy benefits available to the acquirer;

• the structural and regulatory framework;

• investment and share market conditions at the time, and

• the number of competing buyers for a business.

§ acquisitions and listed companies in different countries can be analysed for comparative purposes, but it

is necessary to give consideration to differences in overall share market levels and rating between

countries, economic factors (economic growth, inflation, interest rates), market structure (competition

etc.) and the regulatory framework. It is not appropriate to adjust multiples in a mechanistic way for

differences in interest rates or share market levels;

§ acquisition multiples are based on the target’s earnings but the price paid normally reflects the fact that

there were cost reduction opportunities or synergies available to the acquirer (at least if the acquirer is a

“trade buyer” with existing businesses in the same or a related industry). If the target’s earnings were

adjusted for these cost reductions and/or synergies the effective multiple paid by the acquirer would be

lower than that calculated on the target’s earnings;

§ while EBITDA multiples are commonly used benchmarks they are an incomplete measure of cash flow.

The appropriate multiple is affected by, among other things, the level of capital expenditure (and working

capital investment) relative to EBITDA. In this respect:

• EBIT multiples can in some circumstances be a better guide because (assuming depreciation is a

reasonable proxy for capital expenditure) they effectively adjust for relative capital intensity and

present a better approximation of free cash flow. However, capital expenditure is lumpy and

depreciation expense may not be a reliable guide. In addition, there can be differences between

companies in the basis of calculation of depreciation; and



33

• businesses that generate higher EBITDA margins than their peer group companies will, all other

things being equal, warrant higher EBITDA multiples because free cash flow will, in relative terms,

be higher (as capital expenditure is a smaller proportion of earnings).






34

Appendix 6 Qualifications, Declarations and Consents

Qualifications

The Grant Samuel group of companies provides corporate advisory services in relation to mergers and

acquisitions, capital raisings, corporate restructuring and financial matters generally. One of the primary

activities of Grant Samuel is the preparation of corporate and business valuations and the provision of

independent advice and expert’s reports in connection with mergers and acquisitions, takeovers and capital

reconstructions. Since inception in 1988, Grant Samuel and its related companies have prepared more than

450 public expert and appraisal reports.


The persons responsible for preparing this report on behalf of Grant Samuel are Michael Lorimer, BCA, Simon

Cotter, BCom, MAppFin, FFin, and Jake Sheehan, BCom (Hons). Each has a significant number of years of

experience in relevant corporate advisory matters.

Limitations and Reliance on Information

Grant Samuel’s opinion is based on economic, market and other conditions prevailing at the date of this

report. Such conditions can change significantly over relatively short periods of time. The report is based

upon financial and other information provided by the directors, management and advisers of Rubicon. Grant

Samuel has considered and relied upon this information. Grant Samuel believes that the information

provided was reliable, complete and not misleading and has no reason to believe that any material facts have

been withheld.


The information provided has been evaluated through analysis, enquiry, and review for the purposes of

forming an opinion as to the underlying value of TCLP. However, in such assignments time is limited and

Grant Samuel does not warrant that these inquiries have identified or verified all of the matters which an

audit, extensive examination or “due diligence” investigation might disclose. Grant Samuel has not

undertaken a due diligence investigation of Rubicon or TCLP. In addition, preparation of this report does not

imply that Grant Samuel has audited in any way the management accounts or other records of Rubicon. It is

understood that, where appropriate, the accounting information provided to Grant Samuel was prepared in

accordance with generally accepted accounting practice and in a manner consistent with methods of

accounting used in previous years.


An important part of the information base used in forming an opinion of the kind expressed in this report is

the opinions and judgement of the management of the relevant enterprise. That information was also

evaluated through analysis, enquiry and review to the extent practicable. However, it must be recognised

that such information is not always capable of external verification or validation.


The information provided to Grant Samuel included projections of future revenues, expenditures, profits and

cash flows of Rubicon prepared by the management of Rubicon. Grant Samuel has used these projections

for the purpose of its analysis. Grant Samuel has assumed that these projections were prepared accurately,

fairly and honestly based on information available to management at the time and within the practical

constraints and limitations of such projections. It is assumed that the projections do not reflect any material

bias, either positive or negative. Grant Samuel has no reason to believe otherwise.


However, Grant Samuel in no way guarantees or otherwise warrants the achievability of the projections of

future profits and cash flows for Rubicon. Projections are inherently uncertain. Projections are predictions

of future events that cannot be assured and are necessarily based on assumptions, many of which are beyond

the control of management. The actual future results may be significantly more or less favourable.


To the extent that there are legal issues relating to assets, properties, or business interests or issues relating

to compliance with applicable laws, regulations, and policies, Grant Samuel assumes no responsibility and

offers no legal opinion or interpretation on any issue. In forming its opinion, Grant Samuel has assumed,

except as specifically advised to it, that:

• the title to all such assets, properties, or business interests purportedly owned by Rubicon is good

and marketable in all material respects, and there are no material adverse interests, encumbrances,

engineering, environmental, zoning, planning or related issues associated with these interests, and



35

that the subject assets, properties, or business interests are free and clear of any and all material

liens, encumbrances or encroachments;

• there is compliance in all material respects with all applicable national and local regulations and

laws, as well as the policies of all applicable regulators other than as publicly disclosed, and that all

required licences, rights, consents, or legislative or administrative authorities from any government,

private entity, regulatory agency or organisation have been or can be obtained or renewed for the

operation of the business of Rubicon or TCLP, other than as publicly disclosed;

• various contracts in place and their respective contractual terms will continue and will not be

materially and adversely influenced by potential changes in control; and

• there are no material legal proceedings regarding the business, assets or affairs of TCLP.

Disclaimers

It is not intended that this report should be used or relied upon for any purpose other than as an expression

of Grant Samuel’s opinion as to the merits of the Proposed Transaction. Grant Samuel expressly disclaims

any liability to any Rubicon security holder who relies or purports to rely on the report for any other purpose

and to any other party who relies or purports to rely on the report for any purpose whatsoever.


This report has been prepared by Grant Samuel with care and diligence and the statements and opinions

given by Grant Samuel in this report are given in good faith and in the belief on reasonable grounds that such

statements and opinions are correct and not misleading. However, no responsibility is accepted by Grant

Samuel or any of its officers or employees for errors or omissions however arising in the preparation of this

report, provided that this shall not absolve Grant Samuel from liability arising from an opinion expressed

recklessly or in bad faith.


Grant Samuel has had no involvement in the preparation of the Notice of Meeting issued by Rubicon and has

not verified or approved any of the contents of the Notice of Meeting. Grant Samuel does not accept any

responsibility for the contents of the Notice of Meeting (except for this report).

Independence

Grant Samuel and its related entities do not have any shareholding in or other relationship or conflict of

interest with Rubicon that could affect its ability to provide an unbiased opinion in relation to the Proposed

Transaction. Grant Samuel had no part in the formulation of the Proposed Transaction. Its only role has

been the preparation of this report. Grant Samuel will receive a fixed fee for the preparation of this report.

This fee is not contingent on the outcome of the Proposed Transaction. Grant Samuel will receive no other

benefit for the preparation of this report.

Information

Grant Samuel has obtained all the information that it believes is desirable for the purposes of preparing this

report, including all relevant information which is or should have been known to any Director of Rubicon and

made available to the Directors. Grant Samuel confirms that in its opinion the information provided by

Rubicon and contained within this report is sufficient to enable Rubicon security holders to understand all

relevant factors and make an informed decision in respect of the Proposed Transaction. The following

information was used and relied upon in preparing this report:


§ Publicly Available Information

• Rubicon Annual Reports for FY14, FY15, FY16 and FY 17;

• Capital IQ website to identify comparable transactions;

• Substantial Product Holder notices issued by Rubicon’s major shareholders; and

• Rubicon’s recent Public Filings.


§ Non Public Information

• Tenon Clearwood Management Reports April-October 2017; and

• Management forecasts for Tenon Clearwood and Taupo Wood Solutions for year ending 31 March

2018.

Declarations



36

Rubicon has agreed that it will indemnify Grant Samuel and its employees and officers in respect of any

liability suffered or incurred as a result of or in connection with the preparation of the report. This indemnity

will not apply in respect of the proportion of any liability found by a Court to be primarily caused by any

conduct involving gross negligence or wilful misconduct by Grant Samuel. Rubicon has also agreed to

indemnify Grant Samuel and its employees and officers for time spent and reasonable legal costs and

expenses incurred in relation to any inquiry or proceeding initiated by any person. Where Grant Samuel or

its employees and officers are found to have been grossly negligent or engaged in wilful misconduct Grant

Samuel shall bear the proportion of such costs caused by its action. Any claims by Rubicon are limited to an

amount equal to the fees paid to Grant Samuel.


Advance drafts of this report were provided to the Independent Directors of Rubicon. Certain changes were

made to the drafting of the report as a result of the circulation of the draft report. There was no alteration

to the methodology, evaluation or conclusions as a result of issuing the drafts.

Consents

Grant Samuel consents to the issuing of this report in the form and context in which it is to be included in

Notice of Meeting to be sent to security holders of Rubicon. Neither the whole nor any part of this report

nor any reference thereto may be included in any other document without the prior written consent of Grant

Samuel as to the form and context in which it appears.

Data sourced from publicly available filings. Our datasets may not be complete. Automated analysis can produce errors. If you believe any data on this page is incorrect, please contact us at hello@nzxplorer.co.nz. For informational purposes only. Not investment advice.