Chatham Rock Phosphate Limited logo

CHATHAM ROCK PHOSPHATE LIMITED (“CRP”) MD & A to 3132018

Full Year Results14 June 2018CRPIndustrials

Consolidated Financial Statements
(Expressed in Canadian dollars)


CHATHAM ROCK PHOSPHATE LIMITED

For the year ended March 31, 2018 and 2017

1




CONTENTS


Canadian declaration – Management’s Responsibility for

Financial Reporting

2

New Zealand declaration – Directors’ declaration 3

Auditors’ Report 4

Statement of Financial Position 5

Statement of Changes in Equity 6

Statement of Comprehensive Income 7

Statement of Cash Flows 8

Notes to the Financial Statements 9-30



2


CANADIAN DECLARATION


MANAGEMENT’S RESPONSIBILITY FOR FINANCIAL REPORTING




The accompanying consolidated financial statements of Chatham Rock Phosphate Limited and all the

information in this annual report are the responsibility of management and have been approved by the Board

of Directors.


The consolidated financial statements have been prepared by management in accordance with International

Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”). Financial statements are not precise since they include certain amounts

based on estimates and judgments. Management has determined such amounts on a reasonable basis in order

to ensure that the financial statements are presented fairly, in all material respects. Management has prepared

the financial information presented elsewhere in the annual report and has ensured that it is consistent with

that in the financial statements.


Chatham Rock Phosphate maintains systems of internal accounting and administrative controls in order to

provide, on a reasonable basis, assurance that the financial information is relevant, reliable and accurate and

that the Company’s assets are appropriately accounted for and adequately safeguarded.


The Board of Directors is responsible for ensuring that management fulfills its responsibilities for financial

reporting and is ultimately responsible for reviewing and approving the financial statements. The Board carries

out this responsibility principally through its Audit Committee. (“Committee”).


The Committee is appointed by the Board, and the majority of its members are independent non-executive

directors. The Committee meets at least four times a year with management, and as required with the external

auditors, to discuss internal controls over the financial reporting process, auditing matters and financial

reporting issues, to satisfy itself that each party is properly discharging its responsibilities, and to review the

quarterly and the annual reports, the financial statements and the external auditors’ report. The Committee

reports its findings to the Board for consideration when approving the financial statements for issuance to the

shareholders. The Committee also considers, for review by the Board and approval by the shareholders, the

engagement or reappointment of the external auditors. KPMG, the external auditors, were engaged to audit

the consolidated financial statements in accordance with Canadian Generally Accepted Auditing Standards and

International Standards on Auditing (New Zealand) on behalf of the shareholders. KPMG has full and free access

to the Audit Committee.



Chris Castle

Chief Executive Officer



Robyn Hamilton

Chief Financial Officer


June 12, 2018



3


NEW ZEALAND DECLARATION



DIRECTORS’ DECLARATION



In the opinion of the directors of Chatham Rock Phosphate Limited, the consolidated financial statements and

notes, on pages 5 to 30:


• materially comply with both International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) and generally accepted

accounting practice in New Zealand and give a true and fair view of the financial position of the company and

the group as at March 31, 2018 and the results of their operations and cash flows for the year ended on that

date, and


• Have been prepared using appropriate accounting policies, which have been consistently applied and

supported by reasonable judgements and estimates.


The directors believe that proper accounting records have been kept which enable, with reasonable accuracy, the

determination of the financial position of the company and the group and facilitate compliance of the financial

statements with the Financial Reporting Act 2013 and Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013.


The directors consider that they have taken adequate steps to safeguard the assets of the company and group, and

to prevent and detect fraud and other irregularities. Internal control procedures are also considered to be sufficient

to provide a reasonable assurance as to the integrity and reliability of the financial statements.


The directors are pleased to present the financial statements for Chatham Rock Phosphate Limited for the year

ended March 31, 2018.



For and on behalf of the Board of Directors




___________________________ __________________________________

C Castle J Hatchwell

Director Director

Date: 12 June 2018 Date: 12 June 2018






INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT


To the Shareholders of Chatham Rock Phosphate Limited


We have audited the accompanying consolidated financial statements of Chatham Rock Phosphate Limited, which

comprise the consolidated statements of financial position as at March 31, 2018 and March 31, 2017, the

consolidated statements of profit or loss and other comprehensive income, changes in equity and cash flows for

the years then ended, and related notes, comprising a summary of significant accounting policies and other

explanatory information.

Management’s Responsibility for the Consolidated Financial Statements


Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these consolidated financial statements in

accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards, and for such internal control as management

determines is necessary to enable the preparation of consolidated financial statements that are free from material

misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Auditors’ Responsibility


Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit. We

conducted our audit in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require

that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about

whether the consolidated financial statements are free from material misstatement.

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the

consolidated financial statements. The procedures selected depend on our judgment, including the assessment of

the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making

those risk assessments, we consider internal control relevant to the entity’s preparation and fair presentation of the

consolidated financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances,

but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity’s internal control. An audit also

includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates

made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements.

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained in our audit is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for

our audit opinion.

Opinion


In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial

position of Chatham Rock Phosphate Limited as at March 31, 2018 and March 31, 2017, and its consolidated

financial performance and its consolidated cash flows for the years then ended in accordance with International

Financial Reporting Standards.

Emphasis of Matter


Without modifying our opinion we draw attention to Note 2(d) in the consolidated financial statements financial

statements. The Group has incurred negative cash flow from operations of $2,418,336 (2017: $1,300,839),

a loss of $1,228,005 (2017: $1,636,550) and as at 31 March 2018 has a current year working capital surplus of

$10,130 (2017: $126,081).


The ability to continue to operate long-term is dependent on raising further funding to pursue the Group’s corporate

goals. These events or conditions indicate that a material uncertainty exists that may cast significant doubt on the

Group’s ability to continue as a going concern. Our opinion is not modified in respect of this matter.





12 June 2018

New Zealand



4



5


CHATHAM ROCK PHOSPHATE LIMITED

Consolidated Balance Sheet

(Expressed in Canadian dollars)


March 31, March 31,

Notes

2018 2017





Assets









Current assets:





Cash and cash equivalents



$ 81,484 $ 762,672

Accounts receivable and other receivables



12,631 103,541

Current tax assets


9,973 7,573

Other current assets

5

169,271 556,450



273,359 1,430,236





Non-current assets:




Property, plant and equipment



106 285

NZX Bond


13,962 13,992

Mineral property interest

6

4,552,204 4,244,497



4,566,272 4,258,774




Total assets


$ 4,839,631 $ 5,689,010




Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity






Current liabilities:



Trade and other payables

7

$ 263,229 $ 1,304,155



263,229 1,304,155





Total liabilities


263,229 1,304,155


Shareholders’ equity:




Share capital

8

33,843,499 32,426,568

Currency translation reserve


99,955 97,334

Deficit


(29,367,052) (28,139,047)

Total shareholders’ equity


4,576,402 4,384,855




Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity


$ 4,839,631 $ 5,689,010


Going concern (note 1)

Commitments and contingencies (note 19)


The accompanying notes form an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.



6


CHATHAM ROCK PHOSPHATE LIMITED

Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive (Loss) Income

(Expressed in Canadian dollars)

For the year ended March 31, 2018 and 2017




Notes 2018 2017




Revenue

$ 4,585


$ -



Finance income


7,650 8,216

Finance expense


(50,469) (2,809)

Net finance income/(expense)


11 (42,819) 5,407



Expenses



General and administrative expenses 12 (1,102,537) (1,488,192)

Depreciation

(176) (531)

Exploration costs

(10,230) (2,513)

Marine Consent Application costs

(76,828) (150,721)

Profit/(loss) before income tax (continuing

operations)

(1,228,005) (1,636,550)


Income tax expense




-


-

Net (loss)/profit for the period from continuing

operations

(1,228,005) (1,636,550)






Total comprehensive (loss)/profit for the period



$(1,228,005)


$ (1,636,550)


Basic shareholders’ loss per share (Canadian

cents)



¢ (7.93)


¢ (0.24)


Diluted shareholders’ loss per share (Canadian

cents)




¢ (7.93)


¢ (0.24)


Weighted average number of common shares

outstanding



15,486,362


753,037,211





The accompanying notes form an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.



7


CHATHAM ROCK PHOSPHATE LIMITED

Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity

(Expressed in Canadian dollars, except number of common shares)

For the year ended March 31, 2018 and 2017



Number of Foreign

common Number of Share Translation Accumulated Shareholders’

shares warrants capital reserve deficit equity


Balance, 1 April, 2016 498,206,514 - $ 29,888,605 $ - $ (26,502,497) $ 3,377,275


Issue of shares, net of costs 343,673,040 - 1,929,548 - - 1,929,548

Cancellation of shares (12,034,492) - (44,553) - - (44,553)

Shares surrendered in RTO (817,572,286) - - - - -

Shares issued for acquisition costs 1,355,037 - 589,228 - - 589,228

Mandatory warrants issued in RTO - 379,214 63,740 - - 63,740

Discretionary warrants issued in RTO - 1,524,618 - - - -

Currency translation gain - - - 106,167 - 106,167

Net income for the period - - - - (1,636,550) (1,636,550)


Balance, March 31, 2017 13,627,813 1,903,832 $ 32,426,568 $ 97,334 $ (28,139,047) $ 4,384,855


Issue of shares, net of costs 3,673,333 - 1,416,931 - - 1,416,931

Issue of discretionary warrants - 932,074 - - - -

Exercised mandatory warrants 379,214 (379,214) - - - -

Expired discretionary warrants - (1,524,618) - - - -

Currency translation loss - - - 2,621 - 2,621

Net loss for the period - - - - (1,228,005) (1,228,005)


Balance, March 31, 2018 17,680,360 932,074 $ 33,843,499 $ 99,955 $ (29,367,052) $ 4,576,402


The accompanying notes form an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


8


CHATHAM ROCK PHOSPHATE LIMITED

Consolidated Statements of Cash flows

(Expressed in Canadian dollars)

For the year ended March 31, 2018 and 2017




Notes 2018 2017





Cash flows from operating activities:




Net interest received

$ 5,250 $ 1,024

Cash received from customers

4,585 -

Cash paid to suppliers

(1,179,365) (1,074,746)

Exploration expenditure

(1,198,371) (233,044)

Interest paid

(50,435) -

Tax refund received

- 5,927

Net cash (used in) operating activities

18

(2,418,336)

(1300,839)






Cash flows from investing activities:





Funds withdrawn from Trust account


462,118

-

Funds deposited in Trust account


(4,678)

(273,039)

Net cash (used in) investing activities



457,440

(273,039)






Cash flows from financing activities:






Proceeds from issue of share capital, net of

issue costs



1,296,954


1,925,191

Cash received from reverse acquisition



-

242,005

Net cash from financing activities


1,296,954

2,167,196





Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash

equivalents


(663,942)


593,318

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of

period


762,672


166,461

Effect of foreign exchange rate fluctuations on

cash held


(17,246)


2,893

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period



$ 81,484

$ 762,672



The accompanying notes form an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


CHATHAM ROCK PHOSPHATE LIMITED
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(Expressed in Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated)

For the year ended March 31, 2018 and 2017




9


1. Nature of business and going concern


Chatham Rock Phosphate Limited (the “Group” or “CRP”) is a development-stage Group incorporated under the

Business Corporations Act (British Columbia) and listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange’s Venture Exchange (“TSX-

V”). The Group is also registered on the overseas company register under the New Zealand Companies Act 1993

and listed on the New Zealand Stock Exchange’s Alternative Market (“NZAX”). The Group is an FMC reporting entity

under part 7 of the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013 (New Zealand)

The Group comprises the parent Group and its wholly owned subsidiaries. The financial statements are presented

for the consolidated group.

Chatham Rock Phosphate Limited’s focus is the development and exploitation of the Chatham Rise rock phosphate

deposit offshore New Zealand and potential overseas phosphate projects.

The Group’s registered offices are:

• Suite 1750, 1185 West Georgia Street, Vancouver, B.C., Canada V6E 4E6

• Level 1, 93 The Terrace, Wellington 6011, New Zealand

Accordingly, the Group has reporting obligations in both the Canadian and New Zealand jurisdictions.


2. Basis of preparation


(a) Statement of compliance:

These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the principles of the

International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board

(“IASB”). .

(b) Approval of the financial statements:

The consolidated financial statements for the year ended March 31, 2018 were reviewed by the Audit Committee

and approved and authorized for issue by the Board of Directors on June 12, 2018.

(c) Basis of measurement:

These consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the historical cost basis, utilising the accrual

method of accounting unless otherwise described in the following notes.

CHATHAM ROCK PHOSPHATE LIMITED
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(Expressed in Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated)

For the year ended March 31, 2018 and 2017




10


2. Basis of preparation (continued)


(d) Going concern

These consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which assumes that

the Group will be able to realise its assets and extinguish its liabilities in the normal course of business and at

amounts stated in the financial report. This includes the Group’s minerals mining commitments, being the

minimum work requirements under the Minerals Mining Permit 55549, as set out in Note 19.

The Group incurred a net loss of $1,228,005 during the year ended 31 March 2018 and, as of that date, the

Group’s current assets exceed its current liabilities. The Group had cash reserves of $81,484 and permit work

commitments with associated indicative costings as set out in Note 19.

The above mentioned conditions indicate the existence of a material uncertainty that may cast significant doubt

on the Group’s ability to continue as a going concern.

The Directors have prepared a cash flow forecast through to the period ending March 31, 2019 to support the

ongoing operations of the Group that includes the following:

• The Group continues to manage its corporate costs appropriately within existing available funds.

• The Directors will continue to raise further capital as required by one of a combination of the following:

placement of shares, pro-rata issue to shareholders, and/or further issue of shares to the public.

• The Directors plan to evolve the company from a single project focus into a more diversified company,

principally involving other phosphate assets.

No adjustments have been made relating to the recoverability and reclassification of recorded net asset

amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the exploration permits be ultimately

surrendered or cancelled. The Directors determined the carrying value of assets to be appropriate subject to

the above conditions being met.

(e) Functional and presentation currency:

These consolidated financial statements are presented in Canadian dollars ($) as the Group’s primary listing is

on the Toronto Stock Exchange’s Venture Exchange. The functional currency of the parent company is

Canadian Dollars and the functional currency of Chatham Rock Phosphate (NZ) Limited, the subsidiary

company, is New Zealand dollars (NZD), the currency of the primary economic environment in which it operates.

(f) Significant accounting judgements, estimates and assumptions:

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements requires management to make judgements, estimates

and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of revenues, expenses, assets and liabilities, and

accompanying disclosures, and the disclosure of contingent liabilities. Uncertainty about these assumptions

and estimates could result in outcomes that require a material adjustment to the carrying amount of assets or

liabilities affected in future periods.

CHATHAM ROCK PHOSPHATE LIMITED
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(Expressed in Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated)

For the year ended March 31, 2018 and 2017




11


2. Basis of preparation (continued)

The key assumptions concerning the future and other key sources of estimation uncertainty at the reporting

date, that have a significant risk of causing a material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities

within the next financial year, are described below. The Group based its assumptions and estimates on

parameters available when the financial statements were prepared. Existing circumstances and assumptions

about future developments, however, may change due to market changes or circumstances arising beyond the

control of the Company. Such changes are reflected in the assumptions when they occur.

In the process of applying the Group’s accounting policies, management has made the following judgements,

which have the most significant effect on amounts recognised in the consolidated financial statements:

Share-based payment transactions

The Group measures the cost of equity-settled transactions by reference to the fair value of the equity

instruments at the date at which they are granted.

Exploration and evaluation costs

Significant judgement is required in determining whether it is likely that future economic benefits will be derived

from the capitalised exploration and evaluation expenditure. In the judgement of the Directors, at March 31,

2018 exploration activities in each area of interest where amounts remain capitalised have not yet reached a

stage which permits a reasonable assessment of the existence or otherwise of economically recoverable

reserves. Active and significant operations in relation to each of those areas of interest are planned and nothing

has come to the attention of the Directors to indicate future economic benefits will not be achieved.

In the event where ongoing committed activities cannot be funded by existing financial resources, the Group

will either need to raise additional capital, or meet its obligations either by farm-out or partial sale of the Group’s

exploration interests, or subject to negotiation and approval, vary the minimum work requirements. The

Directors are continually monitoring those areas of interest and are exploring alternatives for funding the

development of those areas of interest when economically recoverable reserves are confirmed. If new

information becomes available that suggests the recovery of expenditure is unlikely, the amounts capitalised

will need to be reassessed at that time.


(g) New standards and interpretations not yet adopted

At the date of authorisation of these consolidated financial statements, certain new standards and

interpretations to existing standards have been published but not yet effective, and have not been adopted early

by the Group.

Management anticipates that all pronouncements will be adopted in the first accounting period beginning on or

after the effective date of the new standard. Information on new standards, amendments and interpretations

that are expected to be relevant to the Group’s consolidated financial statements is provided below. Certain

other new standards and interpretations issued but not yet effective, that are not expected to have a material

impact on the Group’s consolidated financial statements, have not been disclosed.

CHATHAM ROCK PHOSPHATE LIMITED
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(Expressed in Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated)

For the year ended March 31, 2018 and 2017




12


2. Basis of preparation (continued)

IFRS 9 - Financial Instruments (effective from 1 January 2018)

IFRS 9 will replace the multiple classification and measurement models in IAS 39, Financial Instruments:

Recognition and Measurement, with a single model that has only two classification categories: amortized cost

and fair value. The new standard also requires a single impairment method to be used, provides additional

guidance on the classification and measurement of financial liabilities, and provides a new general hedge

accounting standard.

The Company has chosen not to early adopt IFRS 9 Financial Instruments (effective for the year ending March

31, 2019), which was issued during the year. The standard is not expected to have a material impact on the

Group’s financial statements.

Certain comparative information has been represented to conform with current year’s presentation.

3. Significant accounting policies


The accounting policies set out below have been applied consistently for all periods presented in these consolidated

financial statements.

(a) Basis of consolidation:

Business combinations are accounted for using the acquisition method as at the acquisition date, which is the

date on which control is transferred to the Group. Control is the power to govern the financial and operating

policies of an entity so as to obtain benefits from its activities. In assessing control, the Group takes into

consideration potential voting rights that currently are exercisable.


Transactions costs, other than those associated with the issue of debt or equity securities, that the Group incurs

in connection with a business combination are expensed as incurred. Any contingent consideration payable is

measured at fair value at the acquisition date. If the contingent consideration is classified as equity, then it is

not re-measured and settlement is accounted for within equity.


Otherwise, subsequent changes in the fair value of the contingent consideration are recognised in profit or loss.

The Group recognises the fair value of all identifiable assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities of the acquired

business.

Subsidiaries

Subsidiaries are entities controlled by the Group. The financial statements of subsidiaries are included in the

consolidated financial statements from the date that control commences until the date that control ceases.

CHATHAM ROCK PHOSPHATE LIMITED
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(Expressed in Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated)

For the year ended March 31, 2018 and 2017




13


3. Significant accounting policies (continued)


Transactions eliminated on consolidation

Intra-group balances are eliminated in preparing the consolidated financial statements.

These consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Group and its subsidiaries. All inter-Group

transactions and balances are eliminated on consolidation.


Significant subsidiaries of the Group are as follows:


Country of Effective

Name incorporation interest


Chatham Rock Phosphate (NZ) Limited New Zealand 100

Manmar Investments One Hundred and Six (Proprietary)

Limited

Namibia 100

Glass Earth (New Zealand) Limited New Zealand 100

HPD New Zealand Limited New Zealand 100

Glass Earth Geothermal Limited New Zealand 100

Glass Earth Mining Limited New Zealand 100

Goldmines New Zealand Limited New Zealand 100



(b) Currency translation:

Transactions in currencies other than the functional currency are recorded at the rate of exchange prevailing

on the date of the transaction. Monetary assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rate in place on

the reporting date. Non-monetary items that are measured at historical cost in a foreign currency are translated

at the exchange rate on the date of the transaction. Non-monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign

currencies that are measured at fair value are retranslated to the functional currency at the exchange rate at

the date the fair value was determined. Foreign currency translation differences are recognised in profit or loss.

For consolidation purposes, Chatham Rock Phosphate (NZ) Limited is translated into the Group’s presentation

currency of Canadian dollars. Assets and liabilities are translated using the exchange rate prevailing at the end

of the reporting period. Income and expense items are translated at the average exchange rate for the relevant

period. Translation differences are recognised in other comprehensive income (loss) and are accumulated

within equity in the currency translation reserve.


(c) Financial instruments:

Receivables

Receivables are stated at their cost less impairment losses.

Trade and other payables

Trade and other payables are stated at cost.


CHATHAM ROCK PHOSPHATE LIMITED
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(Expressed in Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated)

For the year ended March 31, 2018 and 2017




14


3. Significant accounting policies (continued)


(d) Share capital:

Common shares are classified as equity. Incremental costs directly attributable to the issue of ordinary shares

and share options are recognised as a deduction from equity.

(e) Impairment:

The carrying amounts of the Group’s assets are reviewed at each balance sheet date to determine whether

there is any objective evidence of impairment.

An impairment loss is recognised whenever the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its recoverable amount.

Impairment losses directly reduce the carrying amount of assets and are recognised in the Statement of

Comprehensive Income.

(f) Mineral property interest:

Exploration and evaluation costs, including the costs of applying and acquiring licences, are capitalised as

intangible assets on an area of interest basis. Costs incurred before the Group has obtained the legal rights to

explore an area are recognised in the Statement of Comprehensive Income.

Exploration and evaluation assets are classified as finite lived tangible assets and are measured at cost less

any accumulated amortisation and impairment losses. Amortisation will commence once the Group has

commenced mining operations and will be recognised on a unit of production basis.

Exploration and evaluation assets are recognised and carried forward if the rights of the area of interest are

current and either:

(i) The expenditures are expected to be recouped through successful development and exploitation of

the area of interest; or

(ii) Activities in the area of interest have not at the reporting date, reached a stage which permits a

reasonable assessment of the existence or other wise of economically recoverable reserves and

active and significant operations in, or in relation to, the area of interest are continuing.


Ultimate recoupment of costs is dependent on successful development and commercial exploration or

alternatively sale of respective areas. Costs are written off as soon as an area has been abandoned or

considered to be non-commercial.

Exploration and evaluation assets are assessed for impairment if:

(i) Sufficient data exists to determine technical feasibility and commercial viability, and

(ii) Facts and circumstances suggest that the carrying amount exceeds the recoverable amount (see

impairment accounting policy (e)). For the purposes of impairment testing, exploration and evaluation

assets are allocated to cash-generating units to which the exploration activity relates. The cash

generating unit shall not be larger than the area of interest.

CHATHAM ROCK PHOSPHATE LIMITED
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(Expressed in Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated)

For the year ended March 31, 2018 and 2017




15


3. Significant accounting policies (continued)


Once the technical feasibility and commercial viability of the extraction of mineral resources in an area of interest

are demonstrable, exploration and evaluation assets attributable to that area of interest are first tested for

impairment and then reclassified from intangible assets to mining property and development assets within

property, plant and equipment.

(g) Finance income and expenses:

Finance income comprises interest income on bank deposits and foreign currency gains that are recognised in

the Statement of Comprehensive Income. Interest income is recognised as it accrues, using the effective

interest method.

Finance expenses comprise interest expense and foreign currency losses, are recognised in the Statement of

Comprehensive Income. All borrowing costs are recognised in the Statement of Comprehensive Income using

the effective interest method.

(h) Income tax:

Income tax expense comprises current and deferred tax. Income tax expense is recognised in the Statement

of Comprehensive Income except to the extent that it relates to items recognised directly in equity, in which

case it is recognised in equity.

Current tax is the expected tax payable on the taxable income for the year, using tax rates enacted or

substantively enacted at the reporting date, and any adjustment to tax payable in respect of previous years.

Deferred tax is recognised in respect of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and

liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for taxation purposes. Deferred tax is measured

at the tax rates that are expected to be applied to the temporary differences when they reverse, based on the

laws that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the reporting date.

A deferred tax asset is recognised to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profits will be available

against which temporary differences can be utilised. Deferred tax assets are reviewed at each reporting date

and are reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that the related tax benefit will be realised.

(i) Earnings per share:

The Group presents basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS) data for its ordinary shares. Basic EPS is

calculated by dividing the profit or loss attributable to ordinary shareholders of the Group by the weighted

average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the period.


Diluted EPS is determined by adjusting the profit or loss attributable to ordinary shareholders and the weighted

average number of ordinary shares outstanding for the effects of all dilutive potential ordinary shares, which

comprise share warrants and options.

CHATHAM ROCK PHOSPHATE LIMITED
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(Expressed in Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated)

For the year ended March 31, 2018 and 2017




16


4. Segment reporting


The Group conducts its business as a single reportable operating segment, being the development of a defined rock

phosphate deposit.


The chief operating decision maker, who is responsible for allocating resources and assessing performance of the

operating segment, has been identified as the Board. The Board manages development activity through review and

approval of contracts and other operational information.


The Group operates in the minerals exploration industry within New Zealand and has commenced due diligence

activities on phosphate assets overseas.


5. Other current assets




2018 2017


Prepayments $ 164,593 $ 86,370

Duncan Cotterill Trust Account - 470,080

Salley Bowes Harwardt Trust Account 4,678 -


$ 169,271 $ 556,450


Following a High Court ruling, funds in the Duncan Cotterill Trust account were used to settle disputed EPA

expenses during the current financial year.


6. Mineral property interest


Exploration and evaluation on Chatham Rise Project



2018 2017


Opening balance $ 4,244,497 $ 3,763,865

Exploration costs capitalised 316,808 331,917

Foreign exchange fluctuation (9,101) 148,715


Net book value $ 4,552,204 $ 4,244,497


The recoverability of the carrying amounts of exploration and evaluation assets is dependent on the Group gaining

a Marine Consent for the project to be commercially successful. Commitments and tenure of the permit is included

in Note 19.


CHATHAM ROCK PHOSPHATE LIMITED
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(Expressed in Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated)

For the year ended March 31, 2018 and 2017




17


6. Mineral property interest (continued)


The Group was granted a Minerals Prospecting Licence (“MPL”) 50270 under the Continental Shelf Act 1964 on

February 25, 2010 for a period of four years. The licence covers 2887km2 of the Chatham Rise and is located

approximately 450 kilometres east of Christchurch.


On February 11, 2015 the Group was refused Marine Consent from the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA),

New Zealand’s environmental regulator on grounds which the Group disputes. Subsequently, the Directors impaired

the carrying value of the capitalised costs to represent their best estimate of the recoverability as the Group

reconsiders the re-submission of the Marine Consent with the EPA.


On April 27, 2017 and December 8, 2017 the Group was granted a change of conditions in the permit to further

defer the minimum work programme commitments. All work commitments have been met to date.


In September 2012, the Group applied for 5 prospecting licences offshore Namibia. It remains the intention of the

Directors to pursue these licences.


7. Trade other payables



2018 2017


Trade and other payables due to related parties $ 50,286 $ 212,247

Other trade payables 161,584 179,383

Environmental Protection Agency - 741,865

Accrued expenses 51,359 170,660


$ 263,229 $ 1,304,155

The EPA outstanding $851,865 was settled during the year including interest costs of NZD$55,000 and legal fee

reimbursements of NZD$110,000.


8. Share capital


(a) Authorised:

The Group's share capital consists of an unlimited number of common shares without par value.

The holders of ordinary shares are entitled to receive dividends and are entitled to one vote per share at

meetings of the Group, to the extent to which they have been paid up. All shares rank equally with regard to the

Group’s residual assets.





CHATHAM ROCK PHOSPHATE LIMITED
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(Expressed in Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated)

For the year ended March 31, 2018 and 2017




18


8. Share capital (continued)


(b) Issued and outstanding:


Number

of shares Amount


Balance, April 1, 2016 498,206,514 $ 29,888,605


Issued during the year:

Shares issued net of costs 343,673,040 1,929,548

Cancellation of shares (12,034,492) (44,553)

Shares surrendered in RTO (817,572,286) -

Mandatory warrants issued in RTO - 63,740

Shares issued for acquisition cost 1,355,037 589,228


Balance, March 31, 2017 13,627,813 32,426,568



Issued during the year:

Warrants exercised 379,214 -

Shares issued net of costs 3,673,333 1,416,931


Balance, March 31, 2018 17,680,360 $ 33,843,499


(c) On April 19, 2017 the Company closed a non-brokered private placement of 89,764 common shares for gross

proceeds of CAD$33,213, at a price of CAD$0.37 per common share, under terms that were agreed in October

2017.


(d) On June 28, 2017 the Company closed a non-brokered private placement of 884,587 units at a price of

CAD$0.50 per Unit for gross proceeds of CAD$442,293.50. Each unit consists of one common share and one-

half of one non-transferable share purchase warrant. Each whole warrant entitles the holder to purchase one

common share at a price of CAD$1.00 per share any time prior to the date that is two years from the date of

issuance. A finder’s fee of 6,827 Units was payable to an arm’s length party in connection with this placement.


(e) On October 12, 2017 pursuant to debt settlement agreements with certain of its directors, officers and

consultants, a total of C$167,370 of unpaid wages and consulting fees to such directors, officers and consultants

was settled by the issuance of 347,321 common shares at deemed prices of between C$0.43 to C$0.576 per

share.


(f) On December 1, 2017 the Company issued 1,372,097 common shares pursuant to the rights Issue. The issue

price of the Shares is NZ$0.40 for gross proceeds of NZ$548,838 (C$483,636)


(g) On January 24, 2018 the Company closed a non-brokered private placement of 972,737 units at a price of

CAD$0.30 per Unit for gross proceeds of CAD$291,821. Each Unit consists of one common share and one-half

of one non-transferable share purchase warrant. Each whole warrant entitles the holder thereof to acquire one

common share at a price of CAD$0.45 per share at any time prior to the date that is two years from the date of

issuance.

CHATHAM ROCK PHOSPHATE LIMITED
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(Expressed in Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated)

For the year ended March 31, 2018 and 2017




19


(h) Mandatory Warrants - In February 2017 the Company issued 379,214 Mandatory Warrants as a result of the

reverse takeover by Chatham Rock Phosphate (NZ) Limited (formerly Chatham Rock Phosphate Limited). Each

mandatory warrant requires the holders to acquire one common share of the Company at a price of NZD$0.394

per share on or before April 17, 2018. All of these Mandatory Warrants were exercised in June 2017.


On June 28, 2017 as part of a non-brokered private placement the Company issued 442,293 non-transferable

share purchase warrants. Each warrant entitles the holder to purchase one common share at a price of

CAD$1.00 per share any time prior to the date that is two years from the date of issuance. A finder’s fee of

3,413 warrants were issued as part of a finder’s fee payable to an arm’s length party in connection with this

placement.


On January 24, 2018 as part of a non-brokered private placement the Company issued 486,368 non-

transferable share purchase warrants. Each warrant entitles the holder thereof to acquire one common share

at a price of CAD$0.45 per share at any time prior to the date that is two years from the date of issuance.


(i) Discretionary Warrants - In February 2017 the Company issued 1,524,618 Discretionary Warrants as a result

of the reverse takeover by Chatham Rock Phosphate (NZ) Limited (formerly Chatham Rock Phosphate Limited).

Each discretionary warrant requires the holder to acquire one common share of the Company at a price of

NZD$0.394 per share on or before March 17, 2018. These discretionary warrants were not exercised before

March 17, 2017 and have now expired.


In February 2017 the Company acquired Antipodes Gold Limited via a reverse acquisition. Each shareholder

was offered 1 AXG share for 65.59 shares held in the Company.


9. Share based payments


(a) Recognised share-based payment expenses

The purpose of the share-based payments is to reward key consultants and cornerstone investors in a manner

that aligns remuneration with the creation of shareholder wealth.

As the Company’s activities have been predominantly developing an already defined mineral deposit,

shareholder wealth is dependent, for the foreseeable future, on development success rather than an

improvement in the Company’s earnings.

(b) Equity-settled transactions

Share-based payments of C$167,370 (March, 31 2017: C$84,897, prior to the reverse takeover) settled by the

issue of 347,231 (March, 31 2017: 11,318,795) ordinary shares in the Company




CHATHAM ROCK PHOSPHATE LIMITED
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(Expressed in Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated)

For the year ended March 31, 2018 and 2017




20


10. Earnings per share


The earnings and weighted average number of outstanding shares used in the calculation of basic and diluted

earnings per share are as follows:



2018 2017


Loss used in the calculation of basic

EPS

(1,228,005) (1,636,550)

Weighted average number of

outstanding shares for the purpose of

basic EPS

15,486,362 693,708,728

Effect of dilution, weighted number of

mandatory warrants

- 36,363

Weighted average number of

outstanding shares used in the

calculation of diluted EPS

15,486,362 693,745,091

Basic loss per share (Canadian cents) (7.93) (0.24)

Diluted loss per share (Canadian cents) (7.93) (0.24)




No dilution effect on diluted EPS as the company was operating at a net loss for the period


11. Finance income and expenses




2018 2017




Interest income on bank deposits 7,650 8,216

Finance income 7,650 8,216

Interest expense 50,435 -

Net foreign exchange losses 34 2,809

Finance expense 50,469 2,809

Net finance income and expenses (42,819) 5,407


CHATHAM ROCK PHOSPHATE LIMITED
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(Expressed in Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated)

For the year ended March 31, 2018 and 2017




21


12. General and administrative expenses


The following items of expenditure are included in administrative expenses:



2018 2017




Auditor’s remuneration to KPMG

comprises:


Audit of annual financial statements 32,375 26,996

Professional fees charged in respect

of RTO

- 21,881

Total auditors’ remuneration 32,375 48,877

Accountancy fees 43,254 21,411

Consultancy fees 222,158 223,615

Directors fees - -

Insurance 16,545 6,502

Legal fees 163,593 303,290

Listing fees 16,110 39,223

Management fees 190,919 107,904

Registry fees 22,801 55,241

Rent 20,175 18,618

Reverse acquisition costs - 335,517

Travel 173,842 53,071


The Board has agreed to forfeit directors fees for the year ended March 31, 2018 (beyond the amount charged)

as they are remunerated for their services through consultancy fees.


Refer to Note 17 for discussion on consultancy fees, which are charged by related parties.

CHATHAM ROCK PHOSPHATE LIMITED
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(Expressed in Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated)

For the year ended March 31, 2018 and 2017




22


13. Income tax expense in the Statement of Comprehensive Income


Reconciliation of effective tax rate



2018 2017




Profit/(loss) for the year $ (1,228,005) $ (1,636,550)

Income tax using the Company’s domestic tax rate

27% (2017: 26%)

(331,562) (426,503)

Tax effect of:

Non-deductible expenditure 77,908 185,512

Current year losses for which no deferred tax is

recognised

327,854 379,201

Change in unrecognized temporary differences (61,921) (106,479)

Foreign tax rate differentials (12,279) (32,731)

Income tax expense - -

Comprising:


Current tax expense

- -

Deferred tax expense


Origination and reversal of temporary differences (59,709) (98,873)

Change in unrecognized temporary differences 59,709 98,873

Total income tax expense in income statement

- -


The current tax assets consists of:


Resident withholding tax paid 2,126 7,573

Current tax assets

$ 2,126 $ 7,573


14. Deferred tax assets and liabilities


Unrecognised deferred tax assets

Deferred tax assets have not been recognized in respect of the following:


2018 2017


Deductible temporary differences $ - $ -

Tax losses (9,572,075) (9,244,220)

$ (9,572,075) $ (9,244,220)


Recognised deferred tax assets and liabilities

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are attributable to the following:


2018 2017


Property, plant and equipment $ - $ 43

Intangible assets 1,084,877 1,014,914

Trade and other payables 6,616 6,051

Tax losses (1,091,493) (1,021,008)

$ - $ -

CHATHAM ROCK PHOSPHATE LIMITED
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(Expressed in Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated)

For the year ended March 31, 2018 and 2017




23


15. Financial instruments


Exposure to credit, market, foreign currency, equity prices and liquidity risks arise in the normal course of the Group’s

business.

Financial instruments are comprised of accounts receivable and other receivables, cash and cash equivalents, other

financial assets, trade creditors and other payables, borrowings, and other financial liabilities.

Recognition and de-recognition of financial assets and liabilities

Financial assets and financial liabilities are recognised when the Group becomes a party to the contractual

provisions of the financial instrument. Financial assets and financial liabilities are recognised initially at fair value

plus transaction costs

Financial assets are derecognised when the contractual rights to the cash flows from the financial asset expire, or

if the Group transfers the financial asset to another party without retaining control or substantial all risks and rewards

of the asset.

A financial liability is derecognised when it is extinguished, discharged, cancelled or expires.

Subsequent measurement of financial assets

All financial assets held by the Group in the years reported have been designated into one classification, "loans and

receivables", being non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an

active market. After initial recognition these are measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method, less

provision for impairment. Discounting is omitted where the effect of discounting is immaterial.

All financial assets are subject to review for impairment at least once each reporting date. Accounts receivable are

reviewed for impairment when accounts are past due or when other objective evidence is received that a specific

counterparty will default.

Subsequent measurement of financial liabilities

Trade payables and other borrowings are subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest

method.

Sensitivity analysis

In managing currency risks the Group aims to reduce the impact of short-term fluctuations on the Group’s earnings.

Over the longer-term, however, permanent changes in foreign exchange will have an impact on profit.

It is estimated that a general increase of one percentage point in the value of the New Zealand dollar against other

foreign currencies would have decreased the Group’s profit before income tax by approximately $nil for the period

ended March 31, 2018 (2017: $nil). As a purchaser of foreign currency, the Group’s risk is that the NZD depreciates.

Credit risk:

The Group incurs credit risk from financial instruments when a counter party fails to meet its contractual obligations.

Credit risk arises on cash and other receivables. The Group does not have a significant concentration of credit risk

with any single party.

CHATHAM ROCK PHOSPHATE LIMITED
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(Expressed in Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated)

For the year ended March 31, 2018 and 2017




24


15. Financial instruments (continued)


Market risk:

Market risk is that changes in market prices, such as foreign exchange rates and interest rates will affect the Group’s

income or the value of it’s holding of financial instruments. The objective of market risk management is to manage

and control market risk exposures within acceptable parameters, while optimising the return.

(i) Foreign currency risk:

The Group is exposed to foreign currency risk on purchases that are denominated in a currency other than

the Group’s functional currency, New Zealand dollars (NZD). It is the Group’s policy not to hedge foreign

currency risks.

At March 31, 2018, the Group is exposed to currency risk through the following assets and liabilities

denominated in Canadian dollars:



2018 2017


Cash and cash equivalents 51,574 -

Other current assets 4,678 -

Accounts payable (17,519) (14,065)

38,733 (14,065)


(ii) Interest rate risk:

Interest rate risk is the risk that the fair value or future cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate

because of changes in market interest rates.

The Group’s cash and cash equivalents attract interest at floating rates and have maturities of 90 days or

less. The interest is typical of New Zealand banking rates, which are at present historically low; however,

the Group’s conservative investment strategy mitigates the risk of deterioration to capital invested. A

change of 100 basis points in the interest rate would not be material to the consolidated financial

statements.

Liquidity risk:

Liquidity risk is the risk that the Group will not be able to meet its financial obligations as they fall due. The

Group’s approach to managing liquidity is to ensure, as far as possible, that it will always have sufficient

liquidity to meet its liabilities when due, under both normal and stressed conditions, without incurring

unacceptable losses or risking damage to the Group’s reputation.

Ultimate responsibility for liquidity risk management rests with the Board of Directors, which has built an

appropriate liquidity risk framework for the management of the Group’s short, medium and longer term

funding and liquidity management requirements. The Group manages liquidity risk by maintaining adequate

banking facilities through monitoring of future rolling cash flow forecasts of its operations, which reflect

management’s expectations of the settlement of financial assets and liabilities.

CHATHAM ROCK PHOSPHATE LIMITED
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(Expressed in Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated)

For the year ended March 31, 2018 and 2017




25


15. Financial instruments (continued)


The only financial liabilities are trade and other payables. At March 31, 2018, the Group had $263,299 (2017:

$1,304,155) in trade and other payables. Trade payables are non-interest bearing and have a contractual maturity

of less than 30 days.


(a) Financial assets and liabilities:


As at March 31, 2018, the carrying and fair values of our financial instruments by category are as follows:



Loans and

receivables

Financial

liabilities

Carrying

value Fair value

Less than 1

year 1 to 3 years

$ $ $ $ $ $



Financial assets




Cash and cash

equivalent 81,484 - 81,484 81,484 81,484 -

Trade and other

receivables 12,631


- 12,631 12,631 12,631 -

Other current assets 4,678


- 4,678 4,678 4,678 -

NZX Bond 13,962


- 13,962 13,962 13,962 -



Total financial assets 112,755


- 112,755 112,755 112,755 -



Financial liabilities




Trade and other

payables - 263,299 263,299 263,299 263,299 -



Total financial

liabilities - 263,299 263,299 263,299 263,299 -


(b) Fair value:

All financial instruments measured at fair value are categorized into one of three hierarchy levels, described

below, for disclosure purposes. Each level is based on the transparency of the inputs used to measure the fair

values of assets and liabilities:

• Level 1 - Values based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the

measurement date for identical assets and liabilities.

• Level 2 - Values based on quoted prices in markets that are not active or model inputs that are observable

either directly or indirectly for substantially the full contractual term of the asset or liability.

• Level 3 - Values based on prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both unobservable

and significant to the overall fair value measurement.

CHATHAM ROCK PHOSPHATE LIMITED
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(Expressed in Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated)

For the year ended March 31, 2018 and 2017




26


15. Financial instruments (continued)


The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable and accrued

liabilities approximate their respective fair values due to the short-term nature of these instruments. The

carrying value of the bank term loan approximates its fair value due to the existence of floating market-based

interest rates.

The Group has no financial assets or liabilities included in Level 1, 2 or 3 of the fair value hierarchy.


16. Capital management


The Group defines the capital that it manages as its shareholder equity.

The Group’s objectives with respect to managing capital are to safeguard the Group’s ability to continue as a going

concern so that it can provide future returns to shareholders and benefits for other stakeholders.

The Group’s capital structure reflects a Group focused on mineral exploration and financing both internal and

external growth opportunities. The exploration for and development of mineral deposits involves significant risk

which even a combination of careful evaluation, experience and knowledge may not adequately mitigate.

In order to maintain or adjust its capital structure, the Group may issue new shares or sell assets to fund ongoing

operations.

The Group manages its capital structure by performing the following:

• Preparing budgets and cash-flow forecasts which are reviewed and approved by the Board of Directors;

• Regular internal reporting and Board of Directors meetings to review actual versus budgeted spending and

cash-flows; and

• Detailed project analysis to assess and determine new funding requirements.

There were no changes in the Group’s approach to capital management during the period. The Group is not subject

to externally imposed capital requirements.


17. Related party transactions


(a) Balances receivable and payable:

The amounts due to related parties and included in accounts payable, are non-interest bearing, unsecured and

due on demand, and comprise the following:


2018 2017


Due to directors $ 40,140 $ 181,965

Due to executive officers 10,146 30,282

$ 50,286 $ 212,247

CHATHAM ROCK PHOSPHATE LIMITED
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(Expressed in Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated)

For the year ended March 31, 2018 and 2017




27


17. Related party transactions (continued)


(b) Key management personnel:

Key management personnel includes the consulting and management fees paid and/or accrued to the Group’s

senior officers and directors as follows:


2018 2017


Consultancy fees $ 155,457 $ 373,363

Management fees 190,919 -

$ 346,376 $ 373,363


Depending on the nature of services and costs, certain amounts have been capitalized to intangible assets as

they are directly attributable to the Chatham Rise project.


Transactions and balances with key management personnel and their related parties


During the year, the Company paid management fees of $3,851 (2017: $52,050) to Chris Castle. The

outstanding balance at balance date was $nil (2017: $52,050).


During the year, the Company paid consultancy fees of $38,695 (2017: $53,952) to Robert Goodden Consulting

Ltd, a company in which Mr R Goodden is also a Director. The outstanding balance at balance date was $29,879

(2017: $26,025).


During the year, the Company paid consultancy fees for stakeholder management of $35,901 (2017: $nil) to

Ms L Sanders. The outstanding balance at balance date was $7,609 (2017: $nil). During the year, the Company

paid consultancy fees for stakeholder management of $nil (2017: $74,286) to LJ Sanders Consulting Ltd, a

company in which Ms L Sanders is also a Director. The outstanding balance at balance date was $nil (2017:

$49,881) of which $nil (2017 $24,556) is included in trade payables.


During the year, the Company paid consultancy fees of $1,926 (2017: $81,879) to Robin Falconer Associates

Ltd, a company in which Mr R Falconer is also a Director. The outstanding balance at balance date was $1,954

(2017: $54,009) of which $nil (2017: $27,984) is included in trade payables.


During the year, the Company paid consultancy fees of $61,439 (2017: $49,058) to CRP-OCS Consulting Ltd,

a company in which Mr R Wood is also a Director. The outstanding balance at balance date was $10,146 (2017:

$30,282) of which $10,146 (2017:$27,671) is included in trade payables.


During the year, the Company paid consultancy fees of $17,496 (2017: $6,284) to Nevay Holdings Ltd, a

company in which Mr C Castle & Ms J Hatchwell are also Directors. The outstanding balance at balance date

was $698 (2017: $nil).



CHATHAM ROCK PHOSPHATE LIMITED
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(Expressed in Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated)

For the year ended March 31, 2018 and 2017




28


17. Related party transactions (continued)


Some of the Directors of Chatham Rock Phosphate Ltd are commonly Directors in Aorere Resources Limited,

which in its own name and through its subsidiary; Mineral Investments Ltd has a combined 3.5% (2017: 4.58%)

shareholding in Chatham Rock Phosphate Ltd.


Ms L Sanders, Mr C Castle and Ms J Hatchwell are Directors of Chatham Rock Phosphate Ltd and are also

commonly Directors in Widespread Limited.


During the year, the Company paid management fees of $187,068 (2017: $55,854) to Aorere Resources

Limited. The outstanding balance at balance date was $nil (2017: $nil).



18. Reconciliation of the profit/(loss) for the year with the net cash from operating activities




2018 2017





Profit/(loss) for the period



$(1,228,005)

$

(1,636,550)

Adjustments for:





Depreciation



176

532

Reverse acquisition cost (non-cash)



-

335,517

Expenses (non-cash)



-

30,810






Change in trade and other receivables



21,387

20,224

Change in other current assets



(77,465)

(7,663)

Change in current tax assets



-

(1,281)

Change in trade and other payables



(822,319)

257,063

Change in exploration expenditure



(312,110)

(289,490)

Net cash from operating activities



(2,418,336)

$ (1,300,839)



19. Commitments and contingencies


Licence work commitments

The Group has the following indicative expenditure commitments at balance date (being minimum work

requirements under its minerals mining permit and minerals prospecting licence). The Company is dependent on

certain factors to be able to meet these minimum work requirements. They are set out in Note 2(e).


2018 2017

NZD NZD



Within one year $ - $ -

After one year but not more than five years $ 6,000,000 $ 6,000,000

$ 6,000,000 $ 6,000,000

CHATHAM ROCK PHOSPHATE LIMITED
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(Expressed in Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated)

For the year ended March 31, 2018 and 2017




29


19. Commitments and contingencies (continued)


Minerals Mining Permit 55549

The Minerals Mining Permit was granted on December 6, 2013. On December 7, 2017 the Company was granted

a change of conditions in the permit to defer the minimum work programme commitments. To date all minimum work

commitments have been completed. The minimum work programme includes:

Within 60 months of the commencement date of the permit, the permit holder shall:

• Complete an updated resource optimisation study for the permit area; and

• Prepare a technical report detailing all work completed during this stage of the work programme to be

submitted to the chief executive in accordance with the regulations.

Within 72 months of the commencement date of the permit, the permit holder shall:

• Complete and submit a sufficiently detailed engineering study and feasibility study, which (without

limitation) is at the level of detail to reach a decision-to-mine milestone; and

• Submit a detailed timeline for the construction/refit of a selected vessel including (without limitation) the

detail timing of the commissioning and mobilisation to the Chatham Rise; and

• Complete and submit a marine operations risk review report that includes (without limitation) a HAZID Risk

Assessment Matrix, risk review of on-board processing and risk review of planned and unplanned

maintenance in various weather scenarios; and

• Either commit by notice in writing to the Chief Executive to carry out the work programme obligations set

out for the following 24 months and to commence production within 60 months of the commencement date

of the permit or surrender the permit.

Within 96 months of the commencement date of the permit, the permit holder must spend on average $2 million per

annum completing appropriate sampling, geophysical and geotechnical surveys and data analysis (without

limitation) in respect of the mining blocks identified for the first five years of production. For the remainder of the

term the Company must spend $2 million per annum on carrying out further specified work programme

commitments.


Glass Earth Gold

In March 2014 Glass Earth (New Zealand) Limited (Group’s wholly owned subsidiary) received a notice of claim of

$300,000 from the owner of a property, at which the subsidiary undertook mining activity over the years 2010-12, in

relation to a land access agreement. Whilst it is the intention of the subsidiary to defend this claim, a $37,000

provision has been recognized in these financial statements (no changes from the prior year) to reflect the Group’s

best estimate of any potential legal and other costs associated with defending this claim.

CHATHAM ROCK PHOSPHATE LIMITED
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(Expressed in Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated)

For the year ended March 31, 2018 and 2017




30


20. Subsequent events


Subsequent to year end the Company has received $312,000 towards a non-brokered private placement of up to

4,800,000 units at a price of CAD$0.25 per Unit. Each unit consists of one common share and one-half of one non-

transferable share purchase warrant. Each whole warrant entitles the holder to purchase one common share at a

price of CAD$0.45 per share any time prior to the date that is two years from the date of issuance.


There were no other material subsequent events up to the date of the Audit report.

---

Chatham Rock Phosphate MD&A Report for March 2018 Page 1

 

CHATHAM ROCK PHOSPHATE LIMITED (“CRP”)

  

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS 

FOR THE YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 2018 

 (All amounts stated in Canadian dollars, unless otherwise indicated) 

Attention is called to a caution in respect of Forward‐Looking Statements ‐ included at page 24 

 

CRP is now Stock Exchange listed in Canada, New Zealand and Germany.  

 

Chatham is now positioned on the world stage, to more effectively raise funds from 

international investors. These funds are required to reapply for the Marine Consent required to 

give effect to our granted mining permit.  Our overall objective 

is the mining of phosphate 

nodules on the Chatham Rise (offshore New Zealand).  

 

The TSX.V listing in Canada was achieved by means of a merger with dual listed Antipodes Gold 

Limited (“Antipodes Gold”), which, having sold its Coromandel based gold assets to Newmont 

New Zealand, was a cashed‐up shell. 

Antipodes Gold consolidated its shares 1 for 10 and then 

made a one Antipodes share for 65.59 Chatham shares offer.  That process was complex, highly 

regulated and took over a year to complete.  

 

In parallel with that CRP undertook multiple investor roadshows in Europe and Canada and 

continued to steadily 

raise working capital from investors there, as well as in New Zealand and 

Asia. CRP has now raised more than $5.5 million since the Marine Consent was declined in 

February 2015. During this period, the market capitalisation has recovered from $2.4 million to 

over a peak of $10 million and is

 presently around $5.2 million.  

 

The cornerstone investors are based in Singapore, Germany and Switzerland and together with 

the CRP management team hold, directly and indirectly, approximately 32% of the company. 

The rest of the shares are held by more than 1,800 shareholders in nine countries.   

 

CRP is expecting to 

raise the funds required to complete the Marine Consent reapplication and 

to cover the costs of the Environmental Protection Authority hearing during the next twelve 

months. 

 

It is expected to take 15 months to complete the work required to submit the re‐application 

with a likely submission date in Q3, 

2019. This would lead to an expected grant date of Q2, 2020 

and eventual production in 2022.  

  

 
Chatham Rock Phosphate MD&A Report for March 2018 Page 2


 

Contents 

 

INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 3 

CORPORATE HISTORY AND NATURE OF THE BUSINESS ................................................................................ 3 

BOARD OF DIRECTORS ................................................................................................................................... 5 

CAPITAL TRANSACTIONS AND SIGNIFICANT EVENTS .................................................................................... 5 

Capital Transactions .................................................................................................................................. 5 

Significant Events ....................................................................................................................................... 5 

CHATHAM ROCK PROJECT and EXPLORATION .............................................................................................. 6 

FINANCIAL COMMENTARY .......................................................................................................................... 11 

Summary of Quarterly Results ................................................................................................................ 

11 

Significant Expenses of a Corporate Nature ............................................................................................ 11 

Liquidity and Capital Resources ............................................................................................................... 12 

Related Party Transactions ...................................................................................................................... 12 

SUBSEQUENT EVENTS .................................................................................................................................. 12 

Use of Financial Instruments ................................................................................................................... 13 

Contractual Obligations and Commitments ............................................................................................ 13 

Off‐Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contingent Liabilities .................................................................. 13 

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates 

.............................................................................................. 13 

Mineral Properties ................................................................................................................................... 14 

OUTLOOK ..................................................................................................................................................... 14 

RISKS, UNCERTAINTIES AND OTHER ISSUES ................................................................................................ 14 

Risk Factors .............................................................................................................................................. 14 

SUPPLEMENTAL TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ..................................................................................... 23 

Outstanding Share and Option Data ....................................................................................................... 23 

FORWARD‐LOOKING STATEMENTS ............................................................................................................ 24 

 
Chatham Rock Phosphate MD&A Report for March 2018 Page 3


INTRODUCTION 

This discussion and analysis of the operating results and financial condition of Chatham Rock Phosphate 

Limited (“Chatham Rock”, or the “Company”) for the year ended March 31, 2018, as prepared on June 

12, 2018 should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and related 

notes for the same

 period and is intended to provide the reader with a review of the factors that 

affected the Company’s performance during that year and the factors reasonably expected to impact 

future operations and results.   

The audited consolidated financial statements and related notes of Chatham Rock have been prepared in 

accordance with 

accounting principles that comply with International Financial Reporting Standards 

(“IFRS”) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board.  The financial statements and all 

amounts in this report are expressed in Canadian dollars, except where otherwise indicated. 

 

CORPORATE HISTORY AND NATURE OF THE BUSINESS 

Chatham Rock is incorporated under the Business Corporations Act (British Columbia) and listed on the 

Toronto Stock Exchange’s Venture Exchange (“TSX‐V”). The Company is also registered under the New 

Zealand Companies Act 1993 and listed on the New Zealand Stock Exchange’s Alternative Market 

(“NZAX”).   

A name change from

 Antipodes Gold Limited to Chatham Rock, in February 2017, was undertaken at the 

same time as a reverse takeover arrangement for the Company to acquire its main subsidiary, Chatham 

Rock Phosphate (NZ) Limited (“Chatham (NZ)”) (which was incorporated in New Zealand under the 

Companies Act 1993 on April 27, 

2004). 

Chatham (NZ)'s registered office and principal place of business is located at Level 1, 93 The Terrace, 

Wellington 6011, New Zealand.    

Significant Intercorporate Relationships    

 


Chatham (NZ) is a junior mineral development company, focused on the development of a marine 

phosphorite deposit off the coast of New Zealand.  It has

 not commenced mining operations or 

generated operating revenues to date.   

Chatham (NZ) holds a Mining Permit over an area off the coast of New Zealand with significant seabed 

deposits of rock phosphate and other potentially valuable minerals. 

In 2007, Chatham (NZ) and an associate applied for a prospecting license over

 an area covering a portion 

of a phosphorite deposit on the Chatham Rise, being historically an intensively investigated area of the 

Chatham Rise for potentially economic concentrations of rock phosphate. 

100%

Manmar Investments 106 

(Proprietary) Limited

Incorporated under the laws 

of Namibia

Chatham Rock Phosphate Limited (Chatham Rock)

Incorporated under the Business Corporations Act (British Columbia) 

Chatham Rock Phosphate (NZ) Limited

Incorporated under the New Zealand 

Companies Act 1993

 
Chatham Rock Phosphate MD&A Report for March 2018 Page 4


In 2010, Chatham (NZ) (as to 90%) and its associate (as to 10%) were jointly granted a prospecting 

licence, pursuant to the Crown Minerals Act 1991 of New Zealand, covering 4,726 ݉݇


 of the Chatham 

Rise.  Following the prospecting licence being granted, Chatham (NZ) carried out significant background 

work as part of the licence requirements to further characterize the phosphorite resource and assess the 

potential environmental impacts of a possible mining operation in a marine environment. 

Since acquiring the original prospecting licence 

in 2010, Chatham (NZ) has commissioned six cruises in 

two programs.  The key objects of the cruises were to corroborate the previous work conducted on the 

Chatham Rise and to collect further geological, geotechnical, geophysical and environmental data.  For 

phosphorite grade corroboration purposes, the M.V. Tranquil Image cruise collected 55 samples

 using a 

Van Veen grab.  The R.V. Dorado Discovery conducted four cruises out to the project area and collected 

181 box core and grab samples as well as environmental data. 

The data collected by Chatham (NZ) allowed better delineation of the deposit.  The more recent work by 

Chatham (NZ) on 

investigating this resource confirmed the general tenor of the phosphorite grades and 

location of phosphorite in the area, advanced work aimed at investigating the feasibility of mining the 

resource, and has provided valuable information to assess the environmental effects of the proposed 

mining operations. 

In early 2011, Chatham (NZ) commissioned 

independent studies for the design of a system to recover 

phosphorite from the Chatham Rise seabed from three of the largest dredging companies in the world.  

Boskalis Offshore Subsea Contracting B.V (“Boskalis”) was one of the participants and was selected by 

Chatham (NZ) as its preferred technical partner for the Chatham

 Rise Project.   

Chatham (NZ) divested some oil and gas related investments to its associate in exchange for it 

transferring its 10% interest in the prospecting license to Chatham (NZ), resulting in the project 

becoming wholly owned by Chatham (NZ). 

In September 2012, Chatham (NZ) applied for a Mining Permit in

 respect of a part of the area covered by 

the Continental Shelf Licence.  As part of that application process and in anticipation of applying for the 

Marine Consent, Chatham (NZ) consulted with a range of stakeholders.  This has included the local 

(Maori) Iwi, the Chatham Islands community, the Government, fishing 

groups and a range of 

environmental groups.  The purpose of this consultation was to establish a relationship with these 

parties and to identify and resolve issues associated with the mining proposal.  As a result, the Directors 

believe that the project is now well understood by a wide range of stakeholders and

 in turn Chatham 

(NZ) has a better understanding of the views and possible concerns of all parties whose interests are 

potentially affected by the project.   

The Mining Permit was granted on December 6, 2013.   

In May 2014, Chatham (NZ) submitted to the (New Zealand) Environmental Protection Authority (“EPA”) 

a

 formal application for Marine Consents.  The application was declined on February 11, 2015.   

Chatham (NZ) aims to pursue a re‐submission of its Marine Consent application and has been raising 

equity capital in preparation for this task.  

  

 
Chatham Rock Phosphate MD&A Report for March 2018 Page 5


 

BOARD OF DIRECTORS  

 Chris Castle     President, Managing Director and CEO (New Zealand based); 

 Robert Goodden     Independent non‐executive Chairman (England based);  

 Robin Falconer  Independent non‐executive director (New Zealand based); 

 Jill Hatchwell    Non‐executive director (New Zealand based); 

 Linda Sanders  Non‐executive director (New Zealand based); 

 Ernst 

Schönbächler Non‐executive director (Switzerland based); and 

 Ryan Wong  Non‐executive director (Malaysia based). 

Mr Justin Cochrane Independent non‐executive director (Toronto, Canada) resigned December 22, 

2017. 

 

CAPITAL TRANSACTIONS AND SIGNIFICANT EVENTS 

Capital Transactions 

Chatham (NZ) has continued to raise additional equity capital totalling $1.6m in the eighteen months to 

March 31, 2018.  These funds are being applied to the preparatory work in reapplying for the marine 

consent for the Chatham Rise project.    


Significant Events 

Apart from strong progress in preparing for the marine consent reapplication, the Company completed 

its reverse takeover merger with Antipodes Gold Limited on 24 February 2017.  

  

This resulted in Chatham Rock gaining a listing on the Toronto Venture Exchange (TSX.V Code “NZP”).   

Chatham Rock is now also quoted on 

the Frankfurt Exchange.    

 

The Company and Board of Directors has been strengthened by funding from new shareholders, who are 

now represented by a new director each (Mr Schönbächler and Mr Wong) who add further skill sets to 

the Board.   

 

 

 
Chatham



CHATHA

CHATHAM


The sum

m

Project” o

prepared 

Chatham 

 

The Chat

h

Canadian 

Form 43‐

1

resource f

technical 

complian

c

estimate d

this Repor

on the Ch

since the p

 

Property 

D

 

The Proje

c

east coast


  

m Rock Phos

AM ROCK P

M RISE TECH

mary below 

or the “Proje

by René Ster

Rise Project, 

t

ham Rise Tech

National Ins

101F1.  The R

for the Chat

report com

p

ce with the 2

disclosed in t

rt presents th

hatham Rise P

previous repo

Description a

ct covers an 

t of New Zeala


phate MD&

PROJECT a

HNICAL REPO

concerning C

ect”) is taken

k, MSc MAIG 

the reader is 

hnical Report

trument 43‐1

eport constit

ham Rise Pro

piled by RSC

2012 edition 

the present R

he estimate i

Project in ligh

ort (RSC, 2014

and Ownersh

area of seabe

and at approx

 

L

&A Report fo

and EXPLO

ORT 

Chatham’s C

 from the Ch

MAusIMM C

directed to re

t has been co

101 Standard

tutes the supp

oject.  This r

C on behalf o

of the Joint

Report has no

n compliance

ht of environ

4) was publish

ip 

ed phosphori

ximately 350 

Location of the

or March 20

ORATION  

Chatham Rise

hatham Rise 

CP (Geo).  For 

ead the full C

mpiled by RS

ds of Disclosu

porting docum

resource esti

of Chatham 

t Ore Reserve

ot changed a

e with NI 43‐

nmental perm

hed.  The effe

te nodules th

to 450 m wa

NewZe

e Chatham Rise

018

e Phosphorite

Technical Re

further deta

Chatham Rise 

SC Consulting

ure for Mine

mentation fo

mate has pre

(NZ) (RSC, 2

es Committe

and has an ef

‐101, and also

mitting develo

ective date of

hat is situated

ter depth.  

ealand

e Project

e Project (th

eport dated A

iled informat

Technical Re

g Ltd (“RSC”) i

eral Projects 

or the estimat

eviously bee

2014), which

ee (JORC).  W

ffective date 

o includes up

opments that

f the Report i

d about 450 


P

he “Chatham

April 24, 201

tion concernin

eport. 

in complianc

e

(“NI 43‐101”

te of a phosp

n the subje

c

h was prepar

While the res

of March 3, 

pdated inform

t have taken 

is July 6, 2015

km offshore 

age 6

m Rise 

15 and 

ng the 

e with 

”) and 

horite 

ct of a 

red in 

source 

2014, 

mation 

place 

5. 

of the 

 

 
Chatham Rock Phosphate MD&A Report for March 2018 Page 7


The permits are Mining Permit 55549 granted to Chatham (NZ) in December 2013 (“Mining Permit”) 

along with the Continental Shelf licence MPL 50270 granted in February 2010 (“Prospecting Licence”).  

The Mining Permit is not due to expire until 2033 and, subject to the granting of a Marine Consent from

 

the Environmental Protection Authority (“EPA”), will allow Chatham (NZ) to conduct mining operations.  

The Prospecting Licence (MPL 50270) expired on February 25, 2014 and an application for an extension 

of a term for a further four years was submitted to New Zealand Petroleum and Minerals (“NZPAM”) in 

December 2013. 

 

The licence was successfully renewed in August 2016, for a further 6 years from February 2014. The 

licence area has been reduced from 3,905 square kilometres to 2,876 square kilometres.  

 

A summary of these licence holdings and applications in shown at the table below.  

 

Chatham Licence Holdings and Applications 


Asset Holder Interest (%) Status 

Licence 

Expiry Area (km

2


MP 55549 

Mining Permit 

Chatham 

(NZ) 

100ExplorationDec. 5, 2033 820 

MPL 50270 

Prospecting 

Licence 

Chatham 

(NZ) 

100ExplorationFeb. 24, 

2020 

 

 

2,876 



Geology and Mineralization 

 

The phosphorite deposit occurs as a thin surficial seafloor layer of phosphorite‐bearing glauconitic sand 

with thicknesses typically ranging from 0 to 1 m, at depths of 350 to 450 m below sea level.  The sand 

layer consists of mainly silt and sand‐sized sediments, with phosphatised chalk

 nodules up to 15 cm in 

diameter.  

 

Exploration 

 

Phosphorite nodules were first discovered on the Chatham Rise in the 1950s by a New Zealand 

Government survey.  During the 1960s to 1980s several private and government sponsored cruises 

explored the Chatham Rise and surrounding seafloor area.  The most extensive surveys were

 conducted 

by an agreement between the New Zealand Department of Scientific and Industrial Research and the 

West German Government on cruises by the German research vessels R.V. Valdivia in 1978 and R.V. 

Sonne in 1981.  

 

The 1978 R.V. Valdivia cruise was the first intensive sampling and research campaign to be 

conducted 

over the Chatham Rise; a total of 655 samples from 689 attempts were collected over a 300 km


area in 

the west of the Project area.  The majority of the samples were collected using a large Van Veen‐style 

grab of 0.12 m

3

volume, weighing approximately 400 kg.  

 

The 1981 R.V. Sonne cruise was the most comprehensive exploration effort to assess the Chatham Rise 

phosphorite deposit.  In addition to oceanographic, meteorological and geophysical data, the cruise 

collected 19 hours of video recordings of the sea floor as well as 519 sediment samples taken 

by a 

pneumatic grab‐sampler. The seafloor sediment samples collected during this cruise are the most 

representative sample data collected on the Chatham Rise and are considered to be of a high enough 

quality to include in a resource estimation. 

 

 
Chatham Rock Phosphate MD&A Report for March 2018 Page 8


Since acquiring the licence in 2010, Chatham (NZ) has conducted six cruises in two programs in the 

Project area.  The key task of the cruises was to validate the previous work conducted on the Chatham 

Rise and collect further geological, geotechnical, geophysical and environmental data.  For phosphorite 

grade estimation purposes the

 M.V. Tranquil Image cruise collected 55 samples using a Van Veen grab.  

The R.V. Dorado Discovery conducted four cruises to the Project area and collected 206 box core and 

grab samples. 

 

Sample quality and QA/QC measures varied considerably between the cruises and within each cruise.  A 

critical part of the 

assessment of the data collected in the Project area was to determine what quality 

thresholds to use to allow or disallow data to enter into the estimation process.  As part of the data 

verification process, the relative and absolute quality of the data was assessed in as much detail as 

practically

 possible.  In general, the best samples were those that were collected using the pneumatic 

grab, sampled the full sand horizon, had a small survey error and had no other apparent data 

ambiguities.  Samples collected from the R.V. Sonne are considered to represent the better quality 

samples collected in the licence 

area, followed by some of the R.V. Valdivia samples and then the box 

core samples from the Dorado Discovery.  Samples not included in the resource estimate are samples 

that failed due to technical failure, samples collected but which have no data recorded, samples with no 

location coordinates, non‐validated data and

 samples documented as washed or otherwise biased.  

 

Mineral Resources 

 

Definition of the domains used for modelling was based on seismic facies delineated during the R.V. 

Sonne cruise.  A 2D block model was constructed based on 1 km by 1 km blocks that covers the main 

sampled area based on the

 average data spacing in the main sample areas.  A maximum search radius of 

3,000 m was used based on variogram modelling. 

 

Estimation was performed in each domain using ordinary kriging using the accumulation method on the 

parameters Ph kg/ m

2

 (phosphorite grade), Depth and Sample Quality Ranking (“SQR”).  The grade (Ph 

kg/ m

2

) was then calculated by dividing Ph kg/ m

2

 by the estimated Depth for each block. 

 

A total of 80 million m


at an average grade of 290 kg/ m

2

 is classified as a global Inferred Mineral 

Resource at a cut‐off grade of 100 kg/ m

2

 (table below).  There are no resources classified in indicated or 

measured categories.  As the Chatham Rise phosphorite resource is classified entirely as an Inferred 

Mineral Resource it does not constitute a mineral reserve and so does not have demonstrated economic 

viability.  The specification of the phosphorite (i.e. the phosphate content) 

has been studied by various 

operators including Chatham (NZ), and, even though a representative average grade cannot be 

determined for the Mineral Resource, the tenor of the specification (in the order of 18‐19% P2O5 of 

screened material) is suitable to allow classification into the Inferred Mineral Resource category. 

 

The average

 thickness of the resource is 0.20 m. 

 

Statement of Mineral Resources (phosphorite) for Mining Permit 55549, Chatham Rise.  Estimates are 

rounded to reflect the level of confidence in these resources at the present time. 



Classification Volume (m

3

) Thickness (cm) Ph kg/m

3

 

Inferred 

Mineral 

Resource 

80,000,00020290

Notes: 

1. The Mineral Resource is reported in accordance with CIM NI 43‐101, 2011 edition 

2. The Mineral Resource is contained within MP 55549 

 
Chatham Rock Phosphate MD&A Report for March 2018 Page 9


3. All resources have been rounded to the nearest 0.1 million tonnes 

4. Ph kg/m

3

 is the weight of phosphorite per cubic metre 

5. Even though a representative average grade for the specification (phosphate 

grade) cannot be determined for the Mineral Resource, the tenor of the 

specification (in the order of 18‐19% P

2

O

5

 of screened material) is suitable to allow 

classification into the Inferred Mineral Resource category 

6. The Mineral Resource is reported at 100 kg/m

3

 phosphorite cut‐off grade 

7. The Mineral Resource is classified entirely as an Inferred Mineral Resource.  It does 

not constitute a mineral reserve and so does not have demonstrated economic 

viability. 


RSC’s analysis to date indicates that a potentially economically extractable Mineral Resource exists in the 

Project area.  Several high‐profile sampling cruises, most independent from each other, have all 

identified grades of economic interest within the same area.  These cruises have been well documented 

and specific knowledge on sampling systems has

 been retained and included in this Report. 

 

Recommendations 

 

In addition to the Inferred Mineral Resource described above, in RSC's opinion, there is significant 

exploration potential to extend the Mineral Resource within the Mining Permit.  Based on existing 

sampling data (that was not included in the resource because of lower density

 of sampling or lower SQR 

numbers), the exploration target would be in the order of 30,000,000 to 50,000,000 m


at grades 

between 200 and 300 kg/m


.  The potential quantity and grade of this global exploration target is 

conceptual in nature.  There has been insufficient exploration to define a Mineral Resource and it is 

uncertain if further exploration will result in the target being delineated as a Mineral Resource.  

Exploration potential also exists outside MP 55549 and

 within Chatham (NZ)'s MPL 50270 permit; 

however, there is insufficient suitable information to quantify a target range.  

 

RSC recommends that further seafloor sampling is undertaken to both increase the confidence in the 

established Mineral Resource as well as to extend the boundaries of the resource, predominantly 

towards the west where 

currently low‐quality Valdivia data indicate an exploration target of at least 5 Mt 

phosphorite.  Increasing the confidence in the current Mineral Resource by additional sampling will give 

Chatham (NZ) the grade and geological confidence in the phosphorite deposit to allow them to further 

develop mining plans and economic studies.  

 

Outlook 


Chatham (NZ) continues to progress the Chatham Rise Project towards mining whilst also examining 

other high quality phosphate projects featuring strong grades, meaningful size, mining‐friendly locales 

near significant markets.  

 

Chatham (NZ) remains confident that its phosphate deposit places it in a strong position globally to 

deliver an essential

 ingredient to the agriculture industry, where the demand for food remains a growth 

market in turbulent economic times.  Despite challenging market conditions, Chatham (NZ) considers 

that the ongoing volatility in the major phosphate producing regions (Middle East and North Africa) 

supports its conviction in the importance of executing well‐planned, 

efficient exploration and 

development program designed to advance this high‐quality phosphate project; and to pursue other high 

–quality projects within our area of expertise.  

 

The Chatham Rise phosphate has valuable attributes: 

 

 It is a reactive phosphate, of grades between 21‐22% P205 that may be directly applied to 

existing pastures, without the necessity of beneficiation or upgrading. 

 
Chatham Rock Phosphate MD&A Report for March 2018 Page 10


 

 It is low in deleterious metals (cadmium), and has other significant environmental benefits over 

conventional imported phosphate products. 

 

 It is a key ingredient of New Zealand’s major agriculture industry. 

 

 The project shows strong economic advantages over imported products where production and 

delivery to market costs of 

the Chatham Rise product are equivalent to transport costs to NZ of 

similar products. 

 

 There is significant upside exploration potential, with grab tests of adjacent ground showing 

individual samples of economic grade, and much of the highly prospective Chatham Rise is 

untested. 

 

Chatham (NZ) is in the process of

 reapplying for a marine consent to mine phosphate nodules on the 

Chatham Rise seabed.  Mitigation of the effects of mining on the corals by excluding known coral areas, 

adaptive management, articulation of the clear economic benefits, and a better understanding of 

modelling and risk management should ameliorate EPA concerns.  Chatham 

(NZ) remains confident that 

marine resource consents will be granted. 

 

Current Work Program 

 

 Working closely with the various government organizations, significant work is aimed at 

preparing re‐application documents for the Marine Consent. 

 

 Additional field trials are being scoped to establish the suitability of the Chatham phosphate for

 

direct application in a range of New Zealand geographic agricultural conditions. 

 

 Optimization of the current resources is being undertaken to establish better mine plans that 

amongst a range of outcomes addresses the exclusion of known coral thickets. 

 

  

 
Chatham Rock Phosphate MD&A Report for March 2018 Page 11


FINANCIAL COMMENTARY

The Company prepares and files its financial statements and related notes in accordance with accounting 

principles that comply with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) as issued by the 

International Accounting Standards Board. 

Selected Annual Information 

 Year ended March 31 

 2018 2017 2016 

$000s except for per share    

Total revenue ‐ ‐  

Net profit/(loss) (1,228) (1,637) (725) 

Profit/(Loss) per share – basic and diluted (cents) (7.93) (0.24) (0.20) 

Total assets 4,840 5,689 4,266 

Total long‐term liabilities ‐ ‐ ‐ 

Distribution or cash dividend declared per share ‐ ‐ ‐ 

 

Summary of Quarterly Results 

Quarterly results for the past eight quarters ending March 31, 2018 are as follows: 

 2018 2017 

$000s Q4 Q3 Q2 Q1 Q4 Q3 Q2 Q1 

Cash 81 63 321 779 763 599 493 334 

Working capital 10 (37) (283) 207 126 728 1,019 519 

Total assets 4,840 4,608 5,261 5,892 5,689 5,755 5,955 5,384 

Profit/(Loss) for 

period 

(220) (269) (421) (318) (960) (246) (201) (228) 

Profit/(Loss) per 

share (cents) 

(1.11) (1.71) (2.81) (2.30) (0.14) (0.03) (0.02) (0.04) 

Mineral Project 

expenditures * 

(335) (1,020) 81 76 106 77 

 

111 113 

Cash flow from 

financing (net) 

323 469 (4) 509 553 397 

 

763 422 

Weighted 

average shares 

(millions) 

15 16 15 14 694 829 824 605 

*In recent years, mineral project expenditures have been focussed on the marine consent application and 

reapplication.   

The Company records losses each quarter/year arising from the expensing of its general and 

administration expenses as well as any write‐off of exploration expenditures and other non‐cash expense 

items.  Periodic reviews of

 capitalized exploration expenditures are undertaken and write‐offs and 

provisions are expensed to the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income.   

 

Significant Expenses of a Corporate Nature 

For the year ended March 31, 2018 the Group recorded a Net Loss before income taxes of $1,228,000 

(2017: Net Loss of $1,637,000).   

 
Chatham Rock Phosphate MD&A Report for March 2018 Page 12


Significant expense categories (apart from accumulated exploration write‐offs and provisions) for the 

year are discussed below:  

 

Expenditure 2018

Note 

 

2017 

General and administration 2711 154 

Audit fees 322 49 

Legal fees 1643 303 

Reverse acquisition costs ‐ 336 

Consulting fees 222224 

Registry, Filing and Listing 3994 

Travel and accommodation 17453 

Total 9021,213 

Note 

1. General and Administration costs includes management fees $191,000, accounting services 

$43,000, insurance $17,000 and New Zealand office costs $20,000. 

2. Audit fees covers the audit for 31 March 2018. 

3. Legal costs includes $55,000 payable on settlement of the EPA decision. 

Liquidity and Capital Resources   

The Company’s cash position as at March 31, 2018 was $81,484. Trade and other payables total 

$263,229.  

Judgement was entered against the Group after the Judicial Review held in March, relating to costs 

charged by the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) in respect of the marine consent hearing 

process. The EPA sought

 payment of approximately $714,029 of invoiced but unpaid costs which had 

been challenged by the Directors. The Group immediately paid the EPA the sum under dispute. Interest 

and legal costs of NZ$110,000 were subsequently settled during January 2018. 

The Company’s existing share, option and warrant capital structure is set out 

at the end of this report 

under the heading of “Supplemental to the Financial Statements”. 


Related Party Transactions 

Related party transactions are in the normal course of business and are measured at the exchange 

amount, which is the fair value as agreed between management and the related parties.     

Related party consultancy and management fees totalled $346,376 for the year (2017: $373,363) and are 

set out in detail in the

 financial statements at Note 17.   

Depending on the nature of the services and costs, certain amounts have been capitalised to intangible 

assets as they are directly attributable to the Chatham Rise Project. 

 

SUBSEQUENT EVENTS   

There are no subsequent events to report apart from those mentioned above, being: 

 
Chatham Rock Phosphate MD&A Report for March 2018 Page 13


Subsequent to year end the Company has received $593,000 towards a non‐brokered private placement 

of up to 4,800,000 units at a price of CAD$0.25 per Unit. Each unit consists of one common share and 

one‐half of one non‐transferable share purchase warrant. Each whole warrant entitles the holder to

 

purchase one common share at a price of CAD$0.45 per share any time prior to the date that is two years 

from the date of issuance. In the event that the common shares of the Company trade on the TSX 

Venture Exchange at a closing price of greater than CAD$0.60 

per common share for a period of 20 

consecutive trading days at any time after four months and one day after the closing date of the private 

placement, the Company may accelerate the expiry date of the Warrants by giving notice to the holders 

thereof by way of a news release

 and in such case the Warrants will expire on the 30th day after the date 

of dissemination of the news release. 

 

Use of Financial Instruments 

For the year ended March 31, 2018 Chatham Rock did not enter into any specialized financial 

agreements to minimize its investment risk, currency risk or commodity risk. The principal financial 

instruments affecting the Company’s financial condition and results of operations are currently its cash, 

amounts receivable and prepayments, and accounts payable

 and accrued liabilities.  


Contractual Obligations and Commitments 

a) At March 31, 2018 the Group had no capital commitments (March 31, 2017: Nil).   

b) The Company has no further commitments under the terms of non‐cancellable operating leases 

(March 31, 2017: Nil). 

c) The Company has future multi‐year work program obligations in order to maintain tenure of its

 

mineral permits. These obligations include: ‐ permit rentals, mapping, sampling, data compilation 

and modelling.  These are set out in detail in the financial statements at Note 19. 


Off‐Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contingent Liabilities 

The Company has no off‐balance sheet arrangements.   

 

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates 

Preparing financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the 

reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of any contingent assets and liabilities as at 

the date of the financial statements, as well as the reported amounts of revenues earned and expenses 

incurred during the period.

 These estimates are based on historical experience and other assumptions 

that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. 

The Company’s significant accounting policies are those that affect its financial statements, and are 

summarized in Note 3 of the audited financial statements for the year ended March 31, 2018.  

Critical 

accounting policies and estimates in the year included capitalization of the costs relating to the 

acquisition, exploration and development of non‐producing resource properties and the recognition of 

impairment of those assets, the allocation of proceeds on the purchase or sale of assets, the valuation of 

stock based compensation and tax

 accounts, and contingent liabilities.  

Actual results could differ from these estimates. 

 
Chatham Rock Phosphate MD&A Report for March 2018 Page 14



Mineral Properties 

The decision to capitalize exploration expenditures, and the timing of the recognition that capitalized 

exploration is unlikely to have future economic benefits, can materially affect the reported earnings of 

the Company. In line with accepted industry practice for exploration companies, the Company has 

adopted the policy of deferring property specific acquisition,

 exploration and development costs. 

Deferred costs relating to properties that are relinquished, or where continued exploration is deemed 

inappropriate, are written off in the year such assessment is made. If the Company adopted a policy of 

expensing all exploration costs, the Company’s asset base, shareholders’ equity, and loss from 

operations 

would be materially different. These deferred costs will be amortized on the unit‐of‐

production basis over the estimated useful lives of the properties following the commencement of 

production. The cost of mineral properties includes any cash consideration paid, and the fair market 

value of shares issued on the acquisition of

 property interests, if any. The recorded amounts represent 

actual expenditures incurred and are not intended to reflect present or future values.  

The Company reviews capitalized costs on its property interests on a periodic, or at least annual, basis 

and will recognize an impairment in value based upon current exploration results 

and upon 

management’s assessment of the future probability of profitable revenues from the property or from the 

sale of the property.  Management’s assessment of the property’s estimated current fair market value 

may also be based upon a review of other property transactions that have occurred in the same 

geographic area as

 that of the property under review. 


OUTLOOK 

During 2018 and 2019 the Company proposes to raise sufficient equity finance to complete the re‐

application process for the Marine Consent which has just commenced   

It is then expected to take 15 months to complete the work required to submit the re‐application with a 

likely submission date in Q3,

 2019. This would lead to an expected grant date of Q2, 2020 and eventual 

production in 2022.  

  

For additional information, please refer to the Company’s website at www.rockphosphate.co.nz and for 

regulatory filings, including news releases, please refer to www.SEDAR.com.  

 

RISKS, UNCERTAINTIES AND OTHER ISSUES 

Risk Factors 

Chatham (NZ)’s business of exploring and developing for mineral resources involves a variety of 

operational, financial and regulatory risks that are typical in the natural resource industry.  Chatham (NZ) 

attempts to mitigate these risks and minimize their effect on its financial performance, but there is no 

guarantee that Chatham (NZ) will

 be profitable in the future.  The Company’s common shares should be 

considered speculative.  Investors should carefully consider the following risk factors: 

a. Marine Consent 

 

Chatham (NZ) cannot commence mining operations without the Marine Consent.  Chatham (NZ) 

filed for the Marine Consent on May 14, 2014 but was declined on February 

11, 2015.  While 

Chatham (NZ) considers that it has a good case to receive the Marine Consent on re‐ application, 

 
Chatham Rock Phosphate MD&A Report for March 2018 Page 15


there is no guarantee that the Marine Consent will be granted.  If Marine Consent is not granted 

or is granted subject to economically unfeasible conditions, Chatham (NZ) will not be able to 

proceed with mining operations in respect of the Mining Permit, which could have a material 

adverse effect on the

 financial condition, operations, and prospects of Chatham (NZ). 

 

Recent revisions to the Exclusive Economic Zone (“EEZ”) ACT mean that the Marine Consent 

decision‐making process will typically be completed within a nine‐month period, however, there 

is provision for timeframes to be extended in certain circumstances. Any delay in 

the Marine 

Consent decision‐making process could delay the entering into of a mining contract and the 

commencement of mining operations and production, which could have a material adverse 

effect on the financial condition, operations, and prospects of Chatham (NZ). 

 

b. Uncertainty Relating to Mineral Resources 

 

Resource estimates are a

 product of the skill, experience and judgements of the person carrying 

out the resource estimation and no assurances can be given that the estimated grade and tonnes 

will be realized or that Chatham (NZ) will receive the prices assumed in determining its 

resources.  Valid estimates made at a given time 

may significantly change when new information 

becomes available.  While Chatham (NZ) believes that the resource estimates included in this 

Document are reasonable, resource estimates by their nature are imprecise and depend on the 

quality of the sampling data and to a certain extent, upon statistical inferences that may 

ultimately prove unreliable.

 

 

All of Chatham (NZ)'s resources are reported as Inferred Mineral Resources.  Inferred Mineral 

Resources have a great deal of uncertainty associated with them as to their existence (both 

quantity and ultimately recovered grade).  Generally, Inferred Mineral Resources cannot form 

the basis of a feasibility study or bankable feasibility study.  Owing

 to the nature of Chatham 

(NZ)'s phosphate deposit, and its accessibility, it is not guaranteed that the deposit will ever be 

converted to the measured and indicated resource categories.  As such, there can be no 

assurance that third parties will find Chatham (NZ)'s resource categorization acceptable for 

future funding purposes 

or capital investment decisions, which could have a material adverse 

effect on the financial condition, operations, and prospects of Chatham (NZ). 

 

c. Mining Contract and Mining Process Risk 

 

The technical ability of Chatham (NZ) to extract phosphorite from the seabed is unproven and 

will require the development of a novel 

mining technique in order to accommodate the depth of 

the sea in the Chatham Rise area.  Therefore, there are no assurances that the proposed mining 

method will perform at the necessary water depths as intended or at all. 

 

d. Requirement for Future Funding 

 

Chatham (NZ) is likely to require access

 to further funding in the future and prior to 

commencement of production for a variety of reasons, including working capital, expansion of 

the business, new developments relating to existing operations or new acquisitions.  General 

market conditions, volatile phosphorite markets, the lack of any necessary permit or contract to 

mine, a 

claim against Chatham (NZ) or other factors may make it difficult to secure funding.  

There is no assurance that Chatham (NZ) will be successful in obtaining required funding as and 

when needed on commercially acceptable terms. While Chatham (NZ) has contracted for future 

funding with the Drip Investors and expects that

 those funding commitments from the Drip 

Investors will be satisfied, as with any arrangement of this type, Chatham (NZ) does have a risk of 

default on those commitments being satisfied. 

 
Chatham Rock Phosphate MD&A Report for March 2018 Page 16


 

e. Work Program Commitments 

 

The Mining Permit issued by the New Zealand Petroleum and Minerals (“NZPAM”) department, 

originally required that mining operations commence on or before December 6, 2017 at a mining 

rate of not less than 800,000 tonnes of phosphorite per annum.  Chatham (NZ) has sought and 

already

 been granted changes to the terms of the Mining Permit to reflect that mining 

operations cannot commence before 2019.  Further changes to the conditions of the mining 

permit have subsequently been applied for to reflect ongoing delays in the environmental 

permitting process that Chatham (NZ) must undertake. Chatham (NZ) believes 

that the specified 

mining rate can be achieved with the currently contemplated mining processes, but many of the 

steps needed to reach commencement of mining are beyond the control of Chatham (NZ) and as 

such there can be no guarantee that Chatham (NZ) will be able to meet this target production

 

within the required deadline or at all.  There can be no guarantee that Chatham (NZ) will receive 

Marine Consent and such other permits as may be required for mining operations, nor that it will 

enter into a mining contract should Marine Consent be granted or that a suitable mining vessel 

will be available in the timescale required to allow Chatham (NZ) to satisfy the Mining Permit 

requirements. 

 

The failure of Chatham (NZ) to commence mining at a rate of not less than 800,000 tonnes of 

phosphorite per annum could result in a breach of the Mining Permit and give rise 

to the power 

of the appropriate Minister, as defined in the Crown Minerals Act 1991 of New Zealand, to 

revoke the Mining Permit.  Whilst Chatham (NZ) believes that the appropriate Minister would 

likely amend the terms of the Mining Permit in such circumstances, provided he or she was 

satisfied that Chatham

 (NZ) was making good progress to commence mining operations as soon 

as practicable, there can be no assurance that such discretion would be exercised and any such 

failing could have a material adverse effect on the financial condition, operations, and prospects 

of Chatham (NZ). 

 

The Mining Permit imposed other conditions 

upon Chatham (NZ) as well, including the 

requirement to complete a study within 24 months of the permit being granted (i.e. by 6 

December 2017) in support of a final investment decision.  This deadline has been altered and is 

expected to be waived again. However, no assurance can be given that

 NZPAM will accept 

Chatham (NZ)'s revised timing in satisfaction of this condition, when completed and presented.  

Any such failing could result in the termination or modification of the Mining Permit, which could 

have a material adverse effect on the financial condition, operations, and prospects of Chatham 

(NZ). 

 

Chatham (NZ) was

 also expected to complete appropriate sampling, geophysical and 

geotechnical surveys required to define mining blocks within 48 months of the permit being 

granted (i.e. by 6 December 2017) and spend a minimum of NZD2 million per annum (C$1.9m) in 

carrying out its activities.  This deadline has also been altered once 

and is expected to be altered 

again. However, failure to comply with this condition could result in the termination or 

modification of the Mining Permit, which could have a material adverse effect on the financial 

condition, operations, and prospects of Chatham (NZ). 

 

f. Market Risk 

 

Whilst Chatham (NZ) has engaged

 in market research and identified a number of potential 

buyers and markets in relation to the product to be mined from Chatham Rise, Chatham (NZ) has 

not yet entered into any marketing, sales or offtake agreements that are in markets considered 

material to Chatham (NZ).  In addition, Chatham (NZ) cannot 

be assured of the quality of product 

 
Chatham Rock Phosphate MD&A Report for March 2018 Page 17


that it intends to produce given the nature of Chatham (NZ)'s resource, which could affect 

anticipated demand. Further, the market may develop and change prior to the commencement 

of mining operations and impact negatively on anticipated demand, whether as a result in a 

change in technology, a new source of phosphate

 production or otherwise.  There can be no 

assurance, therefore, that Chatham (NZ) will be in a position to sell all of its mining output, if any, 

at profitable prices, nor at all. 

 

g. Mining Contract and Mining Process Risk 

 

The technical ability of Chatham (NZ) to extract phosphorite from 

the seabed is unproven and 

will require the development of a novel mining technique in order to accommodate the depth of 

the sea in the Chatham Rise area.  Chatham (NZ) intends to use a vessel that is specially modified 

and equipped with a trailing suction unit.  Whilst this solution relies on

 existing, proven 

technology, the compilation of those techniques is novel and the use of the process in its 

proposed form and at the depths of the Chatham Rise area is untried and may require further 

work.  Therefore, there are no assurances that the proposed mining method will perform at the 

necessary water depths as intended or at all. 

 

Modification of a vessel for such purpose will only take place if Chatham (NZ) is granted the 

Marine Consent and enters into a mining contract.  There can be no assurance that Chatham (NZ) 

will be able to enter into such a contract 

on acceptable terms, nor at all, and the failure to do so 

could delay the development of Chatham (NZ)'s project, alter Chatham (NZ)'s mining cost 

assumptions and impair the ability of Chatham (NZ) to carry out future fund raises. Whilst the 

Directors believe that there is competition for the award of

 the mining contract on competitive 

terms, there is no certainty that any alternative contractors to Boskalis would be able to use the 

design work completed by Boskalis, nor that any alternative contractor would be able to provide 

an independently engineered processing solution on a timely basis and at a similar 

anticipated 

cost. 

 

Work on funding strategies for vessel modification or charter is currently being considered by 

Chatham (NZ). The present idea (in conjunction with project leader Boskalis) is to establish a 

special purpose vehicle to own the vessel and to fund the modifications by way of a combination 

of debt and

 equity. A consortium of investors would be sought by Boskalis to contribute equity.  

There is a risk that the required funding may not be secured at all or on terms unfavourable to 

Chatham (NZ), the special purpose vehicle, or the mining operator.  Subject to finalization of the 

financing strategy, Chatham 

Rock may need to contribute equity into the special purpose vehicle 

which may require that Chatham Rock secures further funds. It is not Chatham Rock's intention 

to make a significant equity contribution.  It is also possible, however, that the vessel could be 

owned by a third party marine investor and chartered.

 

 

h. Intellectual Property Risk 

 

In addition to the above, while the proposed mining system comprises a compilation of existing 

technology, freedom‐to‐operate searches have not been undertaken.  There is a remote 

possibility that some intellectual property rights associated with the mining system design could 

be proprietary to other 

parties.  This could require licensing arrangements to be negotiated with 

such parties or alternative designs to be developed (where any such proprietary rights exist).  

There can be no assurance that such licensing arrangements will be negotiated on terms 

favourable or acceptable to Chatham (NZ) or at all. 

 

i. Production Risks 

 

 
Chatham Rock Phosphate MD&A Report for March 2018 Page 18


The future development of any mineral deposit involves significant risks that even a combination 

of careful evaluation, experience and knowledge may not eliminate. This is particularly the case 

in an offshore deposit such as that at Chatham Rise, which is subject to additional risks related to 

its marine location. For example,

 production will be affected by weather patterns and sustained 

periods of bad weather could adversely impact mining activity and reduce tonnages of the rock 

phosphate mined. No assurance can be given that Chatham (NZ) will meet its annual target 

production rates of 1.5Mt per annum once production starts. 

 

Recently a

 New Zealand company called Rocket Lab has signalled that it will be launching 

satellites from the Mahia Peninsula, about 500 km west of the project area. There is a risk that 

jettisoned rocket components could either sink the dredging vessel and/or impede the 

phosphate recovery operations.    

 

Chatham (NZ) has no

 operating history upon which to base estimates of future cash flow.  

Chatham (NZ)'s estimates of resources and cash operating costs are, to a large extent, based 

upon geological, engineering and market analyses.  Estimates of capital and operating costs are 

necessarily preliminary at this stage of Chatham (NZ)'s development.  It is 

possible that actual 

costs and economic returns may differ materially from Chatham (NZ)'s best estimates.  It is not 

unusual in the mining industry for new mining operations to experience unexpected problems 

during the pre‐production phase, take much longer than originally anticipated to bring into a 

producing phase, and to require

 more capital than anticipated. 

 

j. Changes in Law and Policy 

 

The laws, regulations, and authorities governing Chatham (NZ) and its operations may change, 

and may result in additional material expenditures or time delays.  Exploration and mining 

permits may be susceptible to revision or cancellation by new laws or changes 

in direction by the 

government of the day.  In addition, the Exclusive Economic Zone and Continental Shelf 

(Environmental Effects) Act 2012 is new and, as with any new legislation, has not been tested by 

the Courts and could be subject to uncertainty as to its interpretation or application. 

 

Whilst the Directors

 believe that the Government and population of New Zealand generally 

support the development of natural resources in the manner contemplated by Chatham (NZ), 

there is no assurance that future political and economic conditions will not result in the adoption 

of different policies or attitudes affecting ownership of assets, land tenure 

and mineral 

concessions, taxation, royalties, environmental protection, labour relations and return of capital.  

This may affect Chatham (NZ)'s ability to undertake exploration, development and mining 

activities on its projects. 

 

k. Regulatory Compliance Risks 

 

Chatham (NZ)'s future expected mining operations and exploration activities, as well as the 

transportation and handling of 

any products mined, are or will be subject to extensive 

regulations and laws.  Such regulations relate to production, development, exploration, exports, 

imports, taxes and royalties, labour standards, occupational health, waste disposal, protection 

and remediation of the environment, decommissioning and reclamation, toxic substances, 

transportation safety and emergency response, and other matters. Compliance

 with such 

regulations and laws increases the costs of Chatham (NZ)'s operations. 

 

It is possible that, in the future, the costs, delays and other effects associated with such laws and 

regulations may impact Chatham (NZ)'s decision as to whether to operate existing projects, or, 

with respect to exploration and development 

properties, whether to proceed with exploration or 

 
Chatham Rock Phosphate MD&A Report for March 2018 Page 19


development, or that such laws and regulations may result in Chatham (NZ) incurring significant 

costs to remediate or decommission properties that do not comply with applicable 

environmental standards at such time. 

 

Chatham (NZ) expends significant financial and managerial resources to comply with such laws 

and regulations and anticipates the need 

for even greater resources if production is commenced.  

Because legal requirements are subject to change and to interpretation, Chatham (NZ) is unable 

to predict the ultimate cost of compliance with these requirements or their effect on operations.  

Furthermore, future changes in governments, regulations and policies, such as those affecting 

Chatham (NZ)'s

 mining operations and phosphorite transport, could materially and adversely 

affect Chatham (NZ)'s results of operations and financial condition in a particular period or its 

long term business prospects. 

 

Failure to comply with applicable laws, regulations and permitting requirements may result in 

enforcement actions.  These actions may result in orders issued

 by regulatory or judicial 

authorities causing operations to cease or be curtailed, and may include corrective measures 

requiring capital expenditures, installation of additional equipment or remedial actions.  

Chatham (NZ) may be required to compensate others who suffer loss or damage by reason of its 

activities and may have civil or 

criminal fines or penalties imposed for violations of applicable 

laws or regulations. 

 

l. Reliance on Key Equipment 

 

The ability of Chatham (NZ) to extract the phosphorite from the seabed will be dependent on 

unique mining equipment, including a specialized vessel and trailing suction unit.  Should this 

unique equipment become unavailable

 once commissioned, Chatham (NZ) will likely have no 

alternative access to its Mineral Resource. The equipment may become temporarily or 

permanently unavailable to Chatham (NZ) due to factors beyond Chatham (NZ)'s control, 

including adverse weather conditions, labour stoppages, rocket strike, technical failures, 

government regulations, failure to secure any necessary intellectual 

property licenses or 

decisions of the equipment operator.  The unavailability of such equipment could have a material 

adverse effect on the financial condition, operations, and prospects of Chatham (NZ).  

 

m. Phosphate Demand and Pricing 

 

The profitability of Chatham Rock's group operations, and its ordinary Share price, will be highly 

dependent 

upon the market price of phosphate rock. Chatham (NZ)’s net earnings and operating 

cash flow will be closely related and sensitive to fluctuations in the long and short term market 

price of phosphorite.  Commodity prices fluctuate widely and are affected by numerous factors 

beyond the control of Chatham (NZ).  The world

 supply of and demand for fertilizers and the 

stability of exchange rates can all cause significant fluctuations in prices.  These factors cannot be 

accurately predicted.  The price of fertilizers has fluctuated widely in recent years and future 

price declines could cause commercial production to be impracticable, which could have a 

material adverse effect on the financial condition, operations, and prospects of Chatham (NZ). 

 

n. Reliance on Key Personnel 

 

Chatham (NZ)'s success will largely depend on the efforts and abilities of certain senior officers 

and key personnel.  Chatham (NZ) is committed to providing attractive working conditions to 

assist in retaining its

 key senior management personnel.  However, there can be no assurance 

Chatham (NZ) will be able to retain these key personnel.  Furthermore, the number of individuals 

with relevant mining and operational experience in this industry is small.  The loss of key 

 
Chatham Rock Phosphate MD&A Report for March 2018 Page 20


personnel or the inability to recruit and retain high‐calibre staff could have a material adverse 

effect on Chatham (NZ).  The addition of new personnel or employees and the departure of 

existing contractors, particularly in key positions, can be disruptive and may have a material 

adverse effect on the financial condition,

 operations, and prospects of Chatham (NZ). 

 

Personnel requirements of Chatham (NZ) will also change.  At present, Chatham (NZ) has a 

particular need for scientific and communications expertise as it pursues the Marine Consent.  If 

granted, those needs will reduce and there will be increased need for engineering and sales and 

marketing capabilities. There can be no assurance that additional personnel with such 

capabilities, fit for Chatham (NZ)'s purpose, will be secured.  

 

o. Property Title Risk 

 

The Mining Permit covers an offshore area in the EEZ of New Zealand.  The Mining Permit and 

Marine Consent (if issued) can be considered utilization

 rights to that offshore area.  These rights 

may be subject to defects or challenges.  If such defects or challenges cover a material portion of 

Chatham (NZ)'s offshore area, they could materially and adversely affect Chatham (NZ)'s 

reported Mineral Resources or its long term business prospects.  As well, any prolonged 

challenge 

to Chatham (NZ)'s rights could result in substantial delays in its development 

timetable, which could have a material adverse effect on the financial condition, operations, and 

prospects of Chatham (NZ).  Ambiguity can arise in the interpretation of mining legislation 

regulations, permits and policy, including whether or not conditions have or have

 not been 

satisfied (either at the time of satisfaction or subsequent thereto).  For example, the precise 

form of study that is required to be delivered in support of a decision to mine and in satisfaction 

of Mining Permit is not subject to any further detailed guidance or definition.  Interpretations, 

whether 

at the relevant time or subsequent thereto, could result in claims or losses that have a 

material adverse impact on the business, operations, assets or prospects of Chatham (NZ). 

 

 

Maori customary rights, as well as requirements to consult with Maori under applicable New 

Zealand law, are relevant to Chatham (NZ)'s 

rights.  Managing relations with local Maori 

communities is a matter of paramount importance to Chatham (NZ).  Notwithstanding that 

Maori interests do not carry with them a form of "veto" or similar right in relation to the Mining 

Permit or the potential grant of the Marine Consent, there can be no assurance

 that customary 

rights claims, as well as related consultation issues, will not arise on or with respect to Chatham 

(NZ)'s rights and impact on Chatham (NZ)'s exploration, development and mining activities, 

which could have a material adverse effect on the financial condition, operations, and prospects 

of Chatham (NZ). 

 

p. Environmental

 Risk 

 

Chatham (NZ)'s New Zealand projects are subject to New Zealand environmental laws.  These 

laws include laws generally applying to the protection of the environment, as well as specific 

regulation relating to areas in which Chatham operates.  Exploration and mining projects can 

cause a variety of environmental impacts and Chatham 

(NZ) is conscious of a number of potential 

impacts in respect of its proposed mining operations, including: 

 

 impact on fish stocks on the Chatham Rise; 

 pollution risks from the vessel (e.g. oil spills); 

 impact on benthic communities; and 

 effects of plume (where silt and seabed materials 

are separated from the rock phosphate 

 
Chatham Rock Phosphate MD&A Report for March 2018 Page 21


and returned to the ocean floor, but do not settle on the seabed immediately and then 

go into the lower levels of the water column). 

 

Chatham (NZ) has collected and analysed extensive data on these potential effects to develop 

and mitigation strategies, as well as contracted scientific organizations in New 

Zealand and The 

Netherlands (including NIWA and Deltares) to assess the environmental impacts of its 

operations.  This information comprises a significant part of the Marine Consent application. 

 

Chatham (NZ) intends to carry out its operations in compliance with all applicable environmental 

laws and in compliance with any conditions imposed upon 

it, as well as in a responsible manner.  

In the event that Chatham (NZ) does not operate in compliance with all applicable laws and 

conditions there is a risk that the Mining Permit and/or Marine Consent, if granted, could be 

forfeited or other adverse consequences could arise. 

 

q. NGO Risk 

 

Mining companies are often the target of actions by non‐governmental organizations and 

environmental groups in the countries in which they operate.  Such organizations and groups 

may take actions that are illegal, unauthorized or dangerous, without the support of 

government, to disrupt commercial operations.  There can be no guarantee that 

any future 

action will not be taken by any non‐governmental organization or environmental group to 

disrupt Chatham (NZ)'s mining operations.  They may also apply pressure to local, regional and 

national government officials, or local iwi groups, to take actions that are adverse to Chatham 

(NZ)'s operations.  Such actions could have

 an adverse effect on Chatham (NZ)'s ability to 

produce and sell its products, which could have a material adverse effect on the financial 

condition, operations, and prospects of Chatham (NZ). 

 

r. Profitability and Operating History 

 

Chatham (NZ) has no history or earning revenue or profits and no assurance can be

 given by 

Chatham (NZ) that it will have future revenues or profits, since these are dependent on the 

future development and success of any mining operation.  Chatham (NZ) has no history of mining 

operations and is in a pre‐revenue stage of development.  As such, Chatham (NZ) is subject to 

many risks common to such enterprises, including under‐capitalization, cash shortages, 

limitations with respect to personnel, financial and other resources and the lack of revenue.  

There is no assurance that Chatham (NZ) will be successful in achieving a return on Shareholders' 

investment. 

 

s. Competition and Customer Strength 

 

The fertilizer and 

mining industries are intensely competitive in all phases of exploration, 

development and production. Competition in the mining industry is primarily for properties that 

can be developed and produced economically; technical and commercial expertise; and capital.  

Many competitors not only explore for and mine phosphate rock, but conduct beneficiation and 

marketing operations

 on a global basis.  Such competition may result in embedded relationships 

with customers that make it difficult for Chatham (NZ) to negotiate offtake or other supply 

arrangements.  As well, many potential phosphate customers are better capitalized than 

Chatham (NZ) and may engage in tactical order delays and other behaviour that 

could cause 

Chatham (NZ) to suffer cash flow difficulties and induce it to execute transactions that do not 

reflect market conditions, which could have a material adverse effect on the financial condition, 

operations, and prospects of Chatham (NZ). 

 

 
Chatham Rock Phosphate MD&A Report for March 2018 Page 22


t. Conflicts of Interest 

 

Certain of the Chatham (NZ)’s directors, officers and significant shareholders are or may become 

shareholders, directors and/or officers of other natural resource companies, and, to the extent 

that such other companies may participate in ventures with Chatham (NZ), these individuals may 

have a conflict of interest in

 negotiating and concluding terms respecting the extent of such 

participation. 

 

In the event that such a conflict of interest arises at a meeting of the directors, a director who 

has such a conflict will abstain from voting for or against the approval of such participation or of 

its terms.  In

 appropriate cases the Chatham (NZ) will establish a special committee of 

independent directors to review a matter in which one or more directors or officers may have a 

conflict. 

 

From time to time, the Chatham (NZ), together with other companies, may be involved in a joint 

venture opportunity where several

 companies participate in the acquisition, exploration and 

development of natural resource properties, thereby permitting Chatham (NZ) to be involved in 

a greater number of larger projects with an associated reduction of financial exposure in any 

given project.  Chatham (NZ) may also assign all or a portion of its interest in 

a particular project 

to any of these companies due to the financial position of the other Company or companies. 

 

In accordance with the laws of the province of British Columbia, the directors are required to act 

honestly and in good faith with a view to furthering the best interest of Chatham

 (NZ).  In 

determining whether or not the Chatham (NZ) will participate in a particular program or 

transaction and the terms of such participation, the directors will primarily consider the potential 

benefits to Chatham (NZ), the degree of risk to which the Chatham (NZ) may be exposed and its 

financial position 

at that time.  Other than as indicated, the Chatham (NZ) has no procedures or 

mechanisms to deal with conflicts of interest. 

 

u. Dependence on General Economic Conditions 

 

The operating and financial performance of Chatham (NZ) is influenced by a variety of general 

economic and business conditions, including levels of consumer 

spending, inflation, interest 

rates and exchange rates, access to debt and capital markets, and government fiscal, monetary 

and regulatory policies.  Prolonged deterioration in general economic conditions, including an 

increase in interest rates or a decrease in consumer and business demand, could have a material 

adverse effect on Chatham (NZ)'s business and

 financial condition.  

 

v. Exchange Rates 

 

Chatham (NZ) is exposed to movements in exchange rates.  Chatham (NZ)'s historical (New 

Zealand) financial statements are expressed and maintained in New Zealand dollars.  Exchange 

rate movements between New Zealand and other countries may impact the profit and loss 

account or assets and liabilities of

 Chatham (NZ), to the extent the foreign exchange rate risk is 

not hedged or not appropriately hedged. 

 

w. Insurance Risk 

 

Although Chatham (NZ) may obtain insurance to cover some of these risks and hazards in 

amounts it believes to be reasonable, such insurance may not provide adequate coverage in 

the 

event of certain circumstances.  No assurance can be given that such insurance will continue to 

be available or that it will be available at economically feasible premiums or that it will provide 

 
Chatham Rock Phosphate MD&A Report for March 2018 Page 23


sufficient coverage for losses related to these or other risks and hazards.  Furthermore, there are 

risks that Chatham (NZ) cannot insure against, or may elect not to insure against, any such risks 

and hazards and Chatham (NZ) may be subject to liability or sustain loss in such circumstances, 

which could have

 a material adverse effect on the financial condition, operations, and prospects 

of Chatham (NZ). 

 

x. Dividends 

 

There can be no assurance as to the level of future dividends.  The declaration, payment and 

amount of any future dividends of Chatham (NZ) are subject to the discretion of the 

Shareholders or, 

in the case of interim dividends to the discretion of the directors, and will 

depend upon, amongst other things, Chatham (NZ)'s earnings, financial position, cash 

requirements, availability of profits, as well as provisions for relevant laws or generally accepted 

accounting principles from time to time. 

 

Under New Zealand law the board

 of directors may declare dividends from time to time from 

distributable profits provided that the board of directors first resolves and certifies that following 

the dividend being paid, Chatham (NZ) will satisfy the solvency test under the Companies Act 

1993.  This solvency test requires that the board of directors believes 

on reasonable grounds that 

Chatham (NZ) will be able to meet its debts as they fall due and that its assets exceed liabilities, 

including contingent liabilities. 

 

y. Taxation 

 

The tax rules, including stamp duty provisions and their interpretation, relating to an investment 

in Chatham (NZ) may change during the life

 of Chatham Rise project.  The levels of, and reliefs 

from, taxation may also change and vary in respect of a given investor's circumstances.  

 

z. Dual Regulation 

Chatham Rock’s New Zealand subsidiary, Chatham Rock Phosphate (NZ) Limited is primarily 

regulated by the Companies Act 1993.  As a company listed on the

 NZAX, Chatham Rock has the 

Toronto Venture Exchange as its home exchange, with a copy of each document filed in Canada, 

to also be filed with the NZAX. 

aa.  Litigation 

During 2017 Chatham Rock Phosphate (NZ) Limited was engaged in New Zealand High Court 

proceedings with the EPA. Judgement was

 entered against Chatham in December who 

immediately paid the EPA the sum under dispute. Interest and legal costs of NZ$110,000 were 

subsequently settled during January 2018. 


SUPPLEMENTAL TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 

Outstanding Share and Option Data 

Chatham Rock’s shares trade on the TSX Venture Exchange (ticker code NZP), the New Zealand 

Alternative Exchange (ticker code CRP) and the Frankfurt Stock Exchange (ticker code 3GRE). The 

Company is authorized to issue an unlimited number of common shares without par value.  

 

 
Chatham Rock Phosphate MD&A Report for March 2018 Page 24


As at March 31 2017, 17,681,093 common shares were issued and outstanding. There are no shares 

subject to TSX Venture escrow provisions.  

 

On June 28, 2017 the Company closed a non‐brokered private placement of 884,587 units at a price of 

CAD$0.50 per Unit for gross proceeds of CAD$442,293.50. Each 

Unit consists of one common share in 

the capital of the Company and one‐half of one non‐transferable share purchase warrant. Each whole 

warrant entitles the holder to purchase one common share at a price of CAD$1.00 per share any time 

prior to the date that is two years from

 the date of issuance. A finder’s fee of 6,827 Units was payable to 

an arm’s length party in connection with this placement. 

On October 12, 2017 pursuant to debt settlement agreements with certain of its directors, officers and 

consultants, a total of C$193,473 of unpaid wages and consulting fees to 

such directors, officers and 

consultants was settled by the issuance of 347,321 common shares at deemed prices of between C$0.43 

to C$0.576 per share. 

 

On December 1, 2017 the Company issued 1,372,097 common shares pursuant to the rights Issue. The 

issue price of the Shares is NZ$0.40.  

 

On January 24, 2018 the Company closed a non‐brokered private placement of 972,737 units at a price of 

CAD$0.30 per Unit for gross proceeds of CAD$291,821. Each Unit consists of one common share and 

one‐half of one non‐transferable share purchase warrant. Each whole warrant entitles the holder thereof

 

to acquire one common share at a price of CAD$0.45 per share at any time prior to the date that is two 

years from the date of issuance.  

 

In May 2018, the Company granted, pursuant to its stock option plan, incentive stock options to its 

directors, officers and consultants to 

purchase up to an aggregate of 1,690,000 common shares in the 

capital stock of the Company, exercisable for a period of five years, at a price of CAD$0.29 per share.



Mandatory Warrants

On June 28, 2017 as part of a non-brokered private placement the Company issued 442,293 non-transferable share

purchase warrants. Each warrant entitles the holder to purchase one common share at a price of CAD$1.00 per share

any time prior to the date that is two years from the date of issuance. A finder’s fee of 3,413 warrants were issued as

part of a finder’s fee payable to an arm’s length party in connection with this placement.


On January 24, 2018 as part of a non-brokered private placement the Company issued 486,368 non-transferable

share purchase warrants. Each warrant entitles the holder thereof to acquire one common share at a price of

CAD$0.45 per share at any time prior to the date that is two years from the date of issuance.

 

FORWARD‐LOOKING STATEMENTS 

These audited consolidated financial statements and this Management’s Discussion and Analysis, 

contains certain “Forward‐Looking Statements” that are prospective and reflect management’s 

expectations regarding Chatham Rock Phosphate Limited’s (“Chatham Rock” or “Company”) future 

growth, results of operations, performance and business prospects and opportunities. Forward‐looking 

information can often be identified

 by forward‐looking words such as “anticipate”, “believe”, “expect”, 

“goal”, “plan”, “intend”, “estimate”, “may” and “will” or similar words suggesting future outcomes, or 

other expectations, beliefs, plans, objectives, assumptions, intentions or statements about future events 

or performance.  

 
Chatham Rock Phosphate MD&A Report for March 2018 Page 25


All statements, other than statements of historical fact, included herein, including without limitation, 

statements regarding potential mineralization and reserves, estimates of future production, unit costs, 

costs of capital projects and timing of commencement of operations, exploration results and future plans 

and objectives of the Company are forward‐looking statements that involve

 various risks and 

uncertainties. There can be no assurance that such statements will prove to be accurate, and actual 

results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. 

Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from Company’s expectations are 

disclosed in its documents 

filed from time to time with the TSX Venture Exchange and other regulatory 

authorities and include, but are not limited to, failure to establish estimated resources and reserves, the 

grade and recovery of ore to be mined varying from estimates, capital and operating costs varying 

significantly from estimates, delays in obtaining

 or failure to obtain required governmental, 

environmental or other project approvals, inflation, changes in exchange rates, fluctuations in 

commodity prices, delays in the development of projects and other factors.     

Shareholders and prospective investors should be aware that these statements are subject to known and 

unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors 

that could cause actual results to differ materially from 

those suggested by the forward‐looking statements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance 

on forward‐looking information. By its nature, forward‐looking information involves numerous 

assumptions, inherent risks and uncertainties, both general and specific, that contribute to the possibility 

that

 the predictions, forecasts, projections and various future events will not occur. 

Chatham Rock undertakes no obligation to update publicly or otherwise revise any forward‐looking 

information whether as a result of new information, future events or other such factors which  affect this 

information, except as required by law.

Data sourced from publicly available filings. Our datasets may not be complete. Automated analysis can produce errors. If you believe any data on this page is incorrect, please contact us at hello@nzxplorer.co.nz. For informational purposes only. Not investment advice.

Other issuers discussed similar conditions around this time

Matched by meaning across NZX announcement text, not keywords — based on our semantic index of announcement bodies.

  • AFT — AFT Pharmaceuticals Limited: Annual Report FY2018
    2018-06-14

    3233AFT PHARMACEUTICALS LIMITED Annual Report 2018 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income For the year ended 31 March 2018 $NZ000’s 20182017 Loss after tax(12,724)(18,388) Other comprehensive income May be subsequently reclassified to profit and loss…”

  • AFT — AFT Pharmaceuticals Limited: Annual Report
    2018-06-18

    3233AFT PHARMACEUTICALS LIMITED Annual Report 2018 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income For the year ended 31 March 2018 $NZ000’s 20182017 Loss after tax(12,724)(18,388) Other comprehensive income May be subsequently reclassified to profit and loss…”

  • CHI — Channel Infrastructure NZ Limited: Refining NZ 2017 Annual Report
    2018-03-22

    GROUPGROUP 20172016 NOTE$000$000 CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES Receipts from customers 422,036 356,773 Payment for supplies and other expenses (128,785) (133,629) Payments to employees (56,350) (54,950) CASH GENERATED FROM OPERATIONS 236,901 168,194 Interest received 2…”