New Zealand King Salmon Investments Limited logo

NZK FY18 Annual Report

Annual Report26 September 2018NZKConsumer Staples

ANNUAL
REPORT

2018

Big ideas often have humble beginnings.
King salmon were introduced to New Zealand

over 100 years ago. From these first small eggs,

a self-sustaining wild population developed,

and the idea of salmon for game fishing led to

another big idea: King salmon farming.

Our company embraced this vision, which is

why we’re now the world’s largest producer of

this rare species, farming more than 50% of

the world’s supply. Our team of nearly 500,

most in the Top of the South Island, export our

outstanding premium products to 18 countries

and we’re pretty proud of what we’ve achieved.

Now we’re embracing the next big ideas.

With global demand for protein expected


to double by 2050, New Zealand has the

opportunity to feed the world with minimal

environmental impact. We can develop a


world-leading aquaculture industry that is the

greenest primary industry in the country.

New Zealand King Salmon is an aspirational

company and we are excited about what’s in

front of us. It won’t be easy to achieve – but what

big idea ever was?

We believe in creating the ultimate salmon
experience. As the world’s largest producer

with more than 30 years of farming,

processing and branding our unique breed,

we’re the King salmon experts.

Our company and our industry already contribute to a high

quality of life, not only in the Top of the South Island, but all

over New Zealand too.

But there’s even more we can do.

We think it’s time to harness the big ideas to place

New Zealand and our industry, at the forefront of sustainable

food development.

Our King salmon is the highest quality, tastiest salmon you

can get. We’re also incredibly committed to making sure it’s

grown in the safest, most sustainable way possible.

We’re proud that our high-value brands – Ōra King TYEE,

Ōra King, Regal, Southern Ocean and Omega Plus – are

known for their quality, category leadership and innovation

across New Zealand and an increasing number of

international markets.

By investing in cutting-edge aquaculture technology and

expertise, we have the opportunity to position our farming

operations to drive our brands forward and deliver even

better results.

Our aspiration is to farm to the highest standards with

a combination of open ocean and inshore sites, reducing

the impact on our communities and the environment.

The proposed farm relocation would be a stepping stone

towards this vision, by growing our business in a way that

is environmentally, socially and economically sustainable.

This is the future for salmon farming in New Zealand and this

is our opportunity to generate value over the long-term.

“Proudly contributing to
a sustainable food future

with a unique breed of

King salmon grown and

processed in the Top of

the South, New Zealand.”

17% ABOVE FY18 PDS FORECAST
SALMON

BITES

$

16.1

$

160.3

$

26.2

million

million

million

NET PROFIT

AFTER TAX

PRO FORMA

OPERATING

EBITDA

WE SUPPLY

MORE THAN

OF THE WORLD’S

FARMED KING

SALMON

0.7

%

ONLY

OF THE WORLD’S

SALMON IS

KING SALMON

50

%

METRIC TONNES HARVESTED

8,018

4.4

kg

REVENUE OF

AVERAGE

HARVEST

SIZE

$

550million

REVENUE

GENERATED BY

AQUACULTURE

IN NEW ZEALAND

$
28.9

$

503,000

$

904

1223

million

million

RESTAURANTS

FEATURING

ŌRA KING

ON THE MENU

87

%

NEW JOBS

IN FY1818

446

EMPLOYEES

375

SHAREHOLDERS

TOP OF THE

SOUTH

LOW FLOW SALMON

FARMS UNDER

CONSIDERATION

FOR RELOCATION

9ha

TOTAL REGAL BRANDED SALES

TOTAL OMEGA

PLUS PET

FOOD SALES

OF TEAM MEMBERS AT

OR ABOVE LIVING WAGE

5

th

LARGEST

EMPLOYER IN

THE TOP OF

THE SOUTH

A SINGLE

Ō RA KING TYEE

SOLD FOR

1

st

NZD

REVENUE HIGH FLOW SITES

PER HECTARE

BEST AQUACULTURE PRACTICES

(BAP) CERTIFIED SALMON

PRODUCER IN AUSTRALASIA

4 star

$

30.4

CHAIR & CEO REPORT
John Ryder

CHAIRMAN

Grant Rosewarne

MANAGING

DIRECTOR & CEO

The conclusion of our second year as a public

company brings great satisfaction to the Board

and senior management, with a successful

year’s performance, despite challenging

growing and climatic conditions. In addition,

we’ve made further steps in improving our

aquaculture and processing infrastructure, to

deliver the best quality product possible within

the current constrained supply. We must find

a way to capitalise on the thriving demand

we see for our brands worldwide, and suitable

water space is a critical factor in achieving this.

Our long-term plan for capacity expansion and improved

biosecurity has been a key area of focus this year, with the

first stage of the plan hinging on a positive decision from the

Ministry of Primary Industries (MPI) farm relocation proposal.

Longer-term, we are committed to exploring open ocean sites

with newly commercialised farming technology.

Pursuing these big ideas with persistence and sound science

will give us the tools to transform our industry into a significant

contributor to a sustainable food future. We are proud to be

part of the aquaculture industry in New Zealand, which has

huge growth potential.

We’re now the fifth largest employer in the Top of the

South region, and a significant New Zealand food business

and exporter. As the business continues to grow, we have

a responsibility to our industry and to our home region to

demonstrate leadership, set a great example, and collaborate

towards smarter outcomes all-round. Salmon farming is already

one of the most efficient forms of animal food production in

the world, and we are always trying to do even better for our

local communities, our consumers, and all New Zealanders.

NZKS’s mission is to:

• Enrich the lives of our Customers (taste and health),

Team Members (wellness, personal development and

wealth) and Shareholders (wealth, environmental and

social conscience).

• Contribute positively to the Communities in which we

operate providing regional prosperity and operating to

achieve net improvements to the natural environment.

• Reward our Partners (value added relationships) and

Suppliers (transactional relationships) fairly.

We will increase our scale if it maximises the outcomes

for all these stakeholders. As a result of coming into contact

with NZKS we want all stakeholders to be better off.

NZKS is for good.

With regard to our team members we want them, as stated

above, to have the positive outcomes of wellness, personal

development and wealth. We find it helpful and convenient that

someone has created a credible benchmark regarding a decent

living standard in the Living Wage concept. For the time being,

we have adopted this benchmark and set it as a target to be

achieved for all our team members. In the future we may retain

this target or adopt an alternative benchmark. At the end of

FY18, 87% of our team members were at or above the Living

Wage benchmarked and we expect to increase this over time.

A PIVOTAL MOMENT FOR

A GREEN INDUSTRY

A recently released report by the Global Salmon Initiative

(GSI) shows that global demand for protein is set to double by

2050, and that salmon is the most resource-efficient animal

production method on the planet.

International demand for our premium brands is outstripping the

sector’s ability to supply, and with increasing attention around

the appropriate future use of our natural resources, the industry

needs strong Government support to keep growing.

NEW ZEALAND KING SALMON | ANNUAL REPORT FY18

8

INTRODUCTION CHAIR & CEO REPORT

Aquaculture is a ‘sunrise’ industry – in comparison to ‘sunset’
industries such as oil and gas – and has the potential to

contribute significantly to New Zealand’s sustainable food

future. To put this into context, the revenue from just 80 surface

hectares of farming space – roughly the size of a small land farm

and around three times the size of today’s salmon industry in

New Zealand – would be enough to completely eliminate New

Zealand’s 2017 trade deficit of $2.8 billion.

We believe that aquaculture could be the greenest primary

industry for New Zealand, contributing to regional economic

growth and sustainable leadership with a locally sourced

low-impact, healthy and high-value protein.

As a company, we are on the cusp of fulfilling our vision for

growth. The MPI salmon farm relocation proposal currently

being considered by the Government, is the first step in the

industry adapting to deliver improved environmental, social

and economic outcomes for our region. Moving our nine surface

hectares is an important step that allows us to develop and

prove new technology in preparation for offshore farming.

MINISTRY OF PRIMARY

INDUSTRIES' SALMON FARM

RELOCATION PROPOSAL

Over the course of the year, we’ve continued to work positively

with the new Government to progress a plan to relocate some

of our farms to higher-flow waters. The past summer has seen

challenges with fish survival due to warmer water temperatures

in the Marlborough Sounds. Farms located in higher-flow waters

will deliver much better survival over high temperature periods.

We want to move some of our farms to prepare for the future

of salmon farming, improve biosecurity, reduce fish mortality

and create even more green jobs. Through more efficient use

of marine farming space, rather than additional new space,

a successful relocation proposal could create hundreds of new

jobs, significant additional revenue, and thus, the springboard

required to support investing in offshore farms.

OCEAN FARMING – THE

NEXT BIG IDEA

Ocean farming is part of the future of our industry. It will

mean we can farm beyond the Sounds, maximise our

biosecurity management, and further reduce the impact

we have on our community. Long-term, we see our business

requiring a combination of open ocean and inshore sites

to operate successfully and at best practice. It is likely that

inshore sites will be used for staging and harvesting.

Ocean farming provides the best conditions to produce

quality protein at a greater scale, with next to no

environmental footprint. This means we can create

more regional GDP and local jobs, yet avoid disturbing

residents and recreational water users. Additionally,

developing open ocean farming allows us to implement

best practice biosecurity management, by way of

appropriate spatial separation.

Our first step is to develop and prove technology for ocean

farming in New Zealand’s environment, with our unique

species. This requires investment in training and farm

infrastructure, with the first prototype submersible pens

expected to be trialled within our proposed relocation to

higher-flow sites in the Sounds.

Our ability to grow beyond our current projected capacity

of 12,000 metric tonnes by 2032 is predicated on our ability

to deliver considered, collaborative and innovative farming

solutions whilst minimising our impact on nature.

There's a long way to go before we can achieve our

open ocean vision, and we'll be working closely with the

Government, communities and iwi as our plan develops.

“A successful farm relocation

is the first step in fulfilling our

future farming vision.”

Grant Rosewarne, Managing Director & CEO

We hope for a decision from the Minister of Fisheries

in the near future.

2018: BIG IDEAS START HERE

9

INTRODUCTION CHAIR & CEO REPORT

10
NEW ZEALAND KING SALMON ff ANNUAL REPORT FY18

FINANCIAL UPDATE
For the twelve-month period ending 30 June 2018, the Board is

delighted to report a record net profit after tax of $16.1 million.

This is up 14.0% on the Prospective Financial Information (PFI)

as included in our Product Disclosure Statement (PDS). The Pro

Forma operating EBITDA, a metric used extensively by your Board

as an indication of the underlying profitability for the group, is

$26.2 million, up 21.1% on FY17 and 17.0% ahead of PFI.

The excellent FY18 results can be attributed to an initial boost in

volume and an increasing global demand for our salmon.

We saw strong sales growth in export markets, including

increased sales of Ōra King, which delivered improved value.

FY18 saw the company sell 7,779 metric tonnes of gilled and

gutted salmon, an increase of 7.7% on FY17 and up 4.0% on PFI.

Whilst FY18 was impacted by an extended summer period

of higher water temperatures, our strong H1 performance,

coupled with product and pricing mix strategies, helped us

maintain the highest possible value. Our focus remains on our

branded salmon products, with sales of Ōra King, our best-of-

breed salmon brand for premium foodservice, up 25.9% on FY17

and 16.7% on PFI.

New Zealand King Salmon is pleased to advise that a final

dividend of 3.0 cents per share was declared for payment on

21 September, bringing the total dividend paid for FY18 to

5.0 cents per share.

BUSINESS UPDATE

It’s been a tough year in maintaining access for Kiwis to locally

grown fresh King salmon. New Zealand’s enviable position

as a predominantly King salmon producing market has been

threatened due to the lack of local supply, with imported

Atlantic salmon partially filling that gap. Through our

communications programs and our work in the trade,

we’ve aimed to guide consumers to easily identify local King

salmon when they’re shopping, as well as pointing out the

species’ differences.

The nationwide Regal advertising campaign, featuring

Al Brown and Reg the Seal, reinforced our premium local offer

with a strong Marlborough provenance message – “It’s the

merroir that makes the difference”. Coupled with new product

launches of the Regal Manuka Smoked range and an extended

Omega Plus range, we maintained a strong category voice

in the domestic market.

Overseas, we launched Regal smoked salmon ranges in North

America, and in Asia towards the end of the year, whilst Ōra King

sales continued to lead growth, particularly in North America

with regional sales of 2,175 metric tonnes, up 26.6% on FY17.

We also brought one of our big ideas to fruition this year, with

the launch of our exciting new Ōra King TYEE, a pioneering

aquaculture discovery. The unique characteristics of our breed

John Ryder

CHAIRMAN

Grant Rosewarne

MANAGING DIRECTOR & CEO

enable us to grow these rare salmon to over 13 kilograms –

delivering our customers an even more luxurious, yet sustainable,

sushi experience.

PRODUCTION DEVELOPMENTS

As the FY18 year progressed it became apparent that volume

was going to be significantly ahead of NZKS’s expectations and

well ahead of FY17 and PFI. However, at around the same time,

the record FY18 marine summer temperatures took their toll

and brought the volume back to 7.7% up on FY17 and 4.0% up

on PFI. The costs associated with higher mortality would have

normally negatively impacted our financial results, but we were

able to maximise value and thereby achieved a record net

profit after tax.

We continue to work on solutions to address the risk of rising

seawater temperatures – in addition to a strong focus on fish

husbandry and animal welfare, this year we have reduced

stocking density on some farms. We see opportunities to improve

future survival rates for our fish via preventative immunisation

in our hatchery, and specifically targeting robustness in our

selective breeding program.

SUMMARY

The Board would like to take this opportunity to acknowledge

the contribution of our team to New Zealand King Salmon’s

very successful delivery of the two-year commitment within

the Prospective Financial Information (PFI). We would also like

to thank the broader New Zealand King Salmon team - our

shareholders, our customers, our community and our partners,

for supporting us throughout the year.

We look forward to “Creating the Ultimate Salmon

Experience” and achieving our mission to enrich the lives

of all our stakeholders.

Despite the extraordinarily hot

summer, our strategy of strong

brands, diversified markets

and innovation has delivered

a record result.

2018: BIG IDEAS START HERE

11

INTRODUCTION CHAIR & CEO REPORT

PROSPECTIVE FINANCIAL
INFORMATION

Your Board is pleased to announce Net profit

after tax of $16.1m for the full year. This result

is significantly ahead (14.0%) of the Prospective

Financial Information (PFI) as disclosed in our

Product Disclosure Statement (PDS). We are also

delighted to report an operating result that sets

a new record in the history of NZKS. Not only

is Pro Forma operating EBITDA of $26.2m a new

record for the company, it is significantly ahead

of both FY17 and PFI (17.0% and 21.1% respectively).

This result was made possible by the strong

demand both domestically and offshore for our

world-leading salmon, giving rise to increases

in both volumes sold and average sale prices.

The global demand for our unique salmon creates

a platform for future earnings.

FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE – KEY INDICATORS

Directors and management use non-GAAP profit measures when discussing financial performance in this document. The Directors and management believe that

these measures provide information that is useful to stakeholders along with GAAP measures. International financial reporting standards require us to value our

biological assets (salmon) at the end of each year. Changes in the values of biological assets are recognised as a gain or loss in our accounts. However, because only

a small percentage of these fish are ready for harvest, our approach is to focus on profit or loss prior to this adjustment. Furthermore, the non-GAAP profit measures

discussed above are also used internally to evaluate company performance. Non-GAAP profit measures are not prepared in accordance with NZ IFRS and are not

uniformly defined, therefore the non-GAAP profit measures reported in this document may not be comparable with those that other companies report and should

not be viewed in isolation or considered as a substitute for measures reported by New Zealand King salmon Investments Limited in accordance with NZ IFRS.

20182017

Income Statement ($000)ActualPDSActual

Sales volume (MT) 7, 7 7 9 7,480 7,223

Revenue 160.3 143.6

136.4

EBITDA 28.5 26.1

38.5

Pro Forma EBITDA 26.2 22.4

21.6

Net Profit After Tax (NPAT) 16.1 14.1

22.8

Pro Forma Operating NPAT 14.5 11.5

11.8

Total assets 216.0 198.8

204.5

Cash and cash equivalents 14.4 0.6

10.6

Total liabilities 49.7 45.1

45.8

Net Cash/(debt)4.09.6

0.1

Net cash flows from operating activities 24.8 11.5

5.3

The table below summarises the key financial metrics for the business for FY18:

NEW ZEALAND KING SALMON | ANNUAL REPORT FY18

12

INTRODUCTION PROSPECTIVE FINANCIAL INFORMATION

BIOLOGICAL PERFORMANCE – KEY INDICATORS
Low FY17 summer water temperatures and mortality resulted in strong first half growth and harvest of 8,018 metric tonnes,

significantly in excess of the forecasted harvest of 7,518 metric tonnes as noted in the PDS (up 6.7%).

Extended high summer water temperatures gave rise to a significant increase in mortality which increased to 20.4%, ahead of

our PDS (11.0%) and the year prior (8.5%). This increase in summer mortality also negatively impacted closing livestock biomass,

which at 5,391 metric tonnes is now below both the PDS and the prior year, and also the feed volume discharged.

Whilst this result was disappointing, our aquaculture team is focused on continuing to improve fish diet to drive improved fish

health outcomes, as well as investigating other options to lower both the feed conversion ratio (FCR) and mortality in future years.

Actions already put in place to mitigate the ongoing effects of increased temperatures include:

• Immunisation of smolt in freshwater prior to transfer to sea (with nearly one million smolt already immunised and transferred).

• The introduction of additional resource into our fish health and welfare team.

• Continuing evolution and refinement of summer diets including the trialling of specialist health diets.

The FCR showed on improvement on FY17 as benefits were seen from changes to diet, however this remains above our PDS forecasts.

We continue efforts to further improve FCR and are working with Seafood Innovations Ltd, the Cawthron Institute, and existing and

prospective international feed partners to undertake research into improving feed for the King salmon species.

The table below shows key biological measures against the actual performance and the 2018 forecast detailed in the PDS:

20182017

Reconciliation of Non-GAAP to GAAP FinancialsActualPDSActual

Net Profit/ (Loss) After Tax 16,125 14,149 22,764

Add Back:

Depreciation, amortisation and impairment5,105 5,928 4,366

Net financing cost690 478 1,802

Income tax expense/ (income)6,562 5,541 9,601

Statutory EBITDA 28,482 26,096 38,533

Deduct:

Fair value (gains) / losses(2,549)(3,742)(17,962)

Operating EBITDA 25,933 22,354 20,571

Pro Forma adjustments:

Non-recurring or infrequent items

Consent swap expense write off232 - 846

Offer costs - - 1,970

Supplier settlement gain- - (1,784)

Pro Forma Operating EBITDA 26,165 22,354 21,603

Deduct:

Depreciation and amortisation(5,105)(5,928)(4,366)

Net financing cost(690)(478)(878)

Income tax (expense) / income(5,913)(4,493)(4,567)

Pro Forma Operating NPAT 14,457 11,455 11,792

20182017

Biological MetricsActualPDSActual

Harvest Volume (MT)8,0187,5187, 2 3 2

Feed Conversion Ratio (FCR)1.811.76

1.84

Mortality as a % of Biomass20.4%11.0%

8.5%

Closing Livestock Biomass (MT)5,3916,889

6,227

Feed volume (MT)17,95217,986

18,948

In calculating Pro Forma Operating NPAT the income tax expense differs from statutory due to the adjusting of income tax to reflect tax expense on Pro Forma

Operating EBITDA.

The table below shows how Pro Forma EBITDA and Pro Forma Net Profit reconcile to Net Profit in our Financial Statements

(which are prepared in accordance with NZ IFRS).

2018: BIG IDEAS START HERE

13

INTRODUCTION PROSPECTIVE FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Waihinau Bay
Waitata

Kopāua

Forsyth Bay

Crail Bay

(2 sites)

Ruakaka

Otanerau

Ngamahau

Te Pangu

Clay Point

Tio Point

Richmond Bay South

Horseshoe Bay

Mid Waitata

Blowhole Point South

Blowhole Point North

MPI FARM

RELOCATION

FUTURE FARMING RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT

Data collection, initial benchmarking, trialling of technology,

continuing to explore waterspace options in other regions of NZ

VOLUME

*Regional direct and indirect

assuming full relocation.

20162017201820192021

Proposed low flow

sites for relocation

THE BENEFITS

Proposed new

high flow sites

Active sites

8,018mt

~9,500mt

7,232mt

6,315mt

OUR VISION FOR

FUTURE FARMING

FUTURE INCREMENTAL GROWTH

Based on existing water space

FISH HEALTH

SOCIAL

REGIONAL

ECONOMY

ENVIRONMENTAL

In February, the report and

recommendations from the

Marlborough Sounds Salmon

Farm Relocation Advisory Panel

were released. The Minister of

Fisheries is expected to make

a decision in FY19.

PwC Economic

Impact Assessment

Up to 407 new jobs

and $39 million GDP

*

FINANCIAL YEAR

Waihinau Bay
Waitata

Kopāua

Forsyth Bay

Crail Bay

(2 sites)

Ruakaka

Otanerau

Ngamahau

Te Pangu

Clay Point

Tio Point

Richmond Bay South

Horseshoe Bay

Mid Waitata

Blowhole Point South

Blowhole Point North

2032~2028

THE FUTURE INCLUDES

OCEAN FARMING

In addition to optimising conditions

and practices for our existing sea

farms, the next big idea is to focus on

our longer-term options for growth,

in particular ocean farming. There

are well-documented biosecurity

benefits to having farms in multiple

locations and we are currently

reviewing opportunities for farming

in several areas around the South

Island, including Stewart Island. These

steps are at the very early phase of

information gathering and assessment

and are some years away from full

commercial implementation.

Wave

heights

up to

11m

Submersible

for protection

from storms

Distance from

shore at least

2km

POTENTIAL COMMERCIALISATION

THE BENEFITS

~12,000mt

BIOSECURITY

DISTANCE FROM

COMMUNITIES

MINIMAL

SEABED IMPACT

SPACE & DEPTH

O U R
SUSTAINABILITY

STORY

The success of our business

in today’s world is highly

dependent on the communities

and the environment in which

we live and operate, as well

as the people who care for

our salmon and our products

throughout the life cycle.

INTRODUCING OUR
SUSTAINABILITY STORY

Sustainable environmental practices have been

an integral part of our business for many years.

In today's context, sustainability is also about

people and, in a business context, delivering

long-term value to stakeholders.

ANY BIG IDEA MUST BE SUSTAINABLE

From our base in regional New Zealand, we have a vision

for sustainable economic growth. While mitigating the

environmental effects of our activities throughout our entire

business, we also strive for the prosperity and ongoing

development of our people, our stakeholders and

our community.

We aim to pass on our land and water environments to the

next generation and beyond in the same or better condition

than we inherited them.

Access to natural resources, water quality, climate change

and regional economic development are major sustainable

development issues for New Zealand in the early years of

the 21st century.

Our Government has an ambitious target for New Zealand

to become a world leader in sustainability, including improving

the quality of fresh water resources, and achieving a carbon

neutral target by 2050. We believe that our business can

contribute positively towards a better outcome for our

country, and the planet.

Last year, we announced our commitment to five United

Nations' Sustainable Development Goals as a guiding framework

for our sustainability activities, and as a follow-on to this, we

have now committed to five sustainability goals specific to our

business, outlined on the opposite page.

VERIFYING OUR SUSTAINABLE

PRACTICES

Our environmental certifications and recommendations are

achieved through regular audits with independent accreditation

bodies. This year, we achieved another milestone with the Global

Aquaculture Alliance’s (GAA) Best Aquaculture Practices (BAP)

programme. In April 2018, our largest feed supplier, Skretting

Tasmania, achieved BAP certification, enabling NZKS to gain

a fourth star as part of the certification.

Four stars is the highest designation in the BAP third-party

certification program, indicating that a product originates

from a BAP-certified processing plant, farm, hatchery and feed

mill. New Zealand King Salmon is not only the first King salmon

company to earn the distinction worldwide, but also the first

salmon producer in Australasia with four stars. Our other feed

suppliers already carry the requisite certification to support

the achievement of the fourth star.

We also contributed to the fifth year of industry sustainability

reporting with the Global Salmon Initiative (GSI) covering

14 key sustainability indicators – 9 environmental and 5 social.

For more information visit www.globalsalmoninitiative.org/en/

sustainability-report.

AQUACULTURE STEWARDSHIP

COUNCIL (ASC)

As a business, we are aligned with the GSI goal to maintain

and grow the industry’s license to operate, done so by improving

the reputation of both farmed salmon and salmon farming.

As part of the long-term vision of the group, New Zealand

King Salmon has signed up to implement the Aquaculture

Stewardship Council (ASC) accreditation by 2020. We are

currently engaging with auditing bodies to conduct a pilot

evaluation at one of our farm sites.

1

st

Salmon producer

in Australasia to

achieve 4 star

Best Aquaculture

Practices (BAP)

Certification

We aim to pass on our land and

water environments to the next

generation and beyond in the

same or better condition than

we inherited them.

NEW ZEALAND KING SALMON | ANNUAL REPORT FY18

18

OUR SUSTAINABILITY STORY INTRODUCING OUR SUSTAINABILITY STORY

We work to fulfil salmon aquaculture’s potential
as a positive force for the health of people,

nature and our company.

We are committed to caring for water

in our region.

We are a trustworthy and transparent

neighbour and community partner.

We attract and develop talented people

across our diverse roles and teams.

We are committed to using resources responsibly

and reducing our impacts wherever possible.

OUR COMMITMENT TO SUSTAINABILITY

We are focused on the following United Nations Sustainable Development Goals

2018: BIG IDEAS START HERE

19

OUR SUSTAINABILITY STORY OUR COMMITMENT TO SUSTAINABILITY

OUR PEOPLE
One of the key ingredients to the future

sustainability of any business is its people.

With close to 500 team members, predominantly based

in Marlborough and Nelson, we are a significant employer

for the region, requiring a diverse range of skills and

experience. We are proud to be the fifth largest employer

in the Top of the South Island.

We want to help our community prosper by providing an

increasing number of 'green jobs' in our region, committing

to fair pay, attracting and nurturing talent, maintaining

a safe, happy and productive workplace and driving an

engaged culture. In the last year, 18 new roles were recruited

across our business, including eight in Marlborough.

Our goal of ensuring all our team members are paid to the

New Zealand Living Wage standard - around $4 an hour

more than minimum wage - is on track. During the year, we

celebrated our latest milestone towards achieving this as a

result of a further pay increase for those on the collective

agreement in the processing and supply chain teams.

At the end of FY18, 87% of our team members were on

or above the current Living Wage of $20.20 per hour. This

Living Wage is set to increase in September 2018 to $20.55

per hour. By mid-2019, we will have more than 90% of team

members at or over the $20.55 mark.

*Full time equivalent (FTE) figures are approximate and based on a best effort estimate as at April 2018. Nelson, Marlborough and Tasman.

In 2019, all of our team

members will be at or over the

current living wage of $20.20.

LARGEST EMPLOYER IN

THE TOP OF THE SOUTH

*

5

th

NEW ZEALAND KING SALMON | ANNUAL REPORT FY18

20

OUR SUSTAINABILITY STORY OUR PEOPLE

TALENT RECRUITMENT AND
RETENTION

Our people are key to our success. We recognise the need to

attract and retain great talent, continually supporting them

in their professional development.

Supporting our managers in the recruitment process is the first

step to securing the right people with the right skills to fill the

right roles. A key part of this is also around additional personality

profiling and testing to ensure the right cultural fit.

Leadership development is supported within the company

with targeted manager and leadership workshops. Many

team members have gone through the two-day Courageous

Conversations workshops, encouraging strong, sensitive and

assertive communication. More cross-functional visits and

secondment programmes are underway, where we move

team members around the company to encourage learning

opportunities. Team members also undertake international

visits to familiarise themselves with current best practice to

bring the learnings back for application within business.

Professional and personal development includes a broad range

of development activities from qualification-based programs to

focused short courses. We continue to engage with our leaders

and team members with structured leadership and health and

safety conferences, where business strategy and information are

communicated and new ideas are discussed.

THE VALUE OF RECOGNISING

POSITIVE BEHAVIOURS

We actively recognise team members who demonstrate our

company standards and behaviours at a high level. The Way

We Work and Positive Safety Behaviour Awards are a great

way of recognising when our team members go the extra

mile. In the last six months of our financial year we received

approximately 100 nominations for Way We Work or Positive

Safety Behaviour Awards. A few examples of the excellent

work are detailed below:

A team member was nominated for when he was doing

a pre-dive check and noticed the depth gauge hose

failed under pressure. The consequence of a dive gear

failure can be very high so this shows the importance

of doing pre-dive checks correctly and in line with our

standard operating procedures.

A team member was nominated for conducting a very

detailed safety briefing when introducing a new team

member to water blasting. Research has indicated that

new team members are more at risk of accidents than

experienced people so taking time to explain it thoroughly

is a great way of reducing the likelihood of an accident. We

did have a notifiable incident involving a water blaster in

FY18 which fortunately did not result in injury.

21

2018: BIG IDEAS START HERE

DIVERSITY
As part of our efforts to attract and retain a diverse

workforce, we work hard to ensure our new team members

are well supported in their new roles and homes. Financial

assistance is offered to relocate key international recruits and

English language training is available. We are committed

to supporting a diverse workforce in terms of race, age and

gender, and our membership of the Employee Assistance

Programme continues to ensure relevant support and advice

is readily available to every team member.

We also put a lot of effort into supporting employees as

they get older or those who suffer age-related disabilities

or unexpected life changes. NZKS is also proud to be

supportive of working parents, with a range of mothers,

in particular, working part or flexi-time to suit their

childcare commitments.

Our company is proud of the way it continues to attract

international talent. For example, this year, we recruited a fish

welfare specialist and qualified vet from Chile. He brings 12 years

of experience in fish farming, working in the areas of salmon

production, fish health and welfare and fish feed analysis. This

appointment is part of our ongoing commitment to fish welfare.

We also actively encourage movement and promotion within

existing teams. For example, one team member has progressed

through several roles to recently join our customer service

team. Similarly, two of our farm workers have moved to the

net cleaning team, and others have moved between the

harvest and dive teams.

We also welcome secondments such as one team member

who worked in our hot smoke factory for 13 years, and is now

on secondment at our hatchery in Takaka, and another who

is now working part-time in marketing in addition to his role

in the customer service team.

NEW ZEALAND KING SALMON | ANNUAL REPORT FY18

22

OUR SUSTAINABILITY STORY OUR PEOPLE

WORK PLACEMENTS AND
INTERNSHIPS

We also understand the value in supporting students, the

next generation of our workforce.

By offering work placements and internships, we provide

students an opportunity to gain hands-on experience working

within a local organisation.

We partner with Nelson Marlborough Institute of Technology

(NMIT) to provide scholarships and work experience for

Aquaculture students, many of whom have completed

placements at our hatcheries or on our sea farms. We are

delighted to have some of those graduates now employed

in our Aquaculture team.

This year, we increased the NMIT scholarships to include two

recipients from the NMIT Business School and the Culinary

School to reflect the diverse range of careers available within our

company. Each scholar will be offered tailored work experience

opportunities to suit their career aspirations.

We have also taken on students as paid interns in our Finance,

IT and Marketing teams, as well as in our new division,

Omega Innovations.

SCHOLARSHIP RECIPIENTS 2018

Chris Waters

NZ King Salmon Aquaculture Scholarship recipient, Year 3

A special interest in whether native New Zealand sea cucumbers

can be grown below salmon farms was behind Chris Waters’

scholarship application. Being a mature student with two sons

still at home, Chris has no access to a student loan this year

so the scholarship is “significant’ for him to complete his study.

He hopes to one day repay NZKS as a future employee.

David Stephens

NZ King Salmon Aquaculture Scholarship recipient, Year 2

David Stephens is halfway towards achieving the degree

he’s always wanted, a dream that stems from a lifelong love

of the marine environment and an interest in aquaculture.

Ruby Boyd

NZ King Salmon Aquaculture Scholarship recipient, Year 1

Whakatane student Ruby Boyd, 17, loves seafood, so when

she happened to meet an NMIT lecturer who told her about

their aquaculture course, she enrolled and moved to Nelson.

“It’s something I’m interested in and something I can get

a job in.”

Raylene Juniper

NZ King Salmon Business Scholarship recipient

Raylene Juniper (also known as Raylene Finlay) started studying

accounting in February 2017 and despite the "hard going"

of juggling four of her five children still living at home, has

maintained an A average.

"My goal is to provide for my family the best I can and I couldn't

see a supermarket job or the dole doing that. I wanted to show

the kids that even though it's hard, you still can manage things,

and to go for it."

Eugene Ringdahl

NZ King Salmon Hospitality Scholarship recipient

Eugene Ringdahl already had a few years of cooking experience

under his apron when he decided it was time to extend his

knowledge and continue his learning. Eugene also works as

chef de partie at The Tides Restaurant in Nelson.

“Aquaculture is something I’m

interested in, and I know there are

good job opportunities.”

Ruby Boyd, Scholarship recipient

Left to right: Grant Rosewarne, David, Eugene (front), Ruby,

Jemma McCowan, Raylene and Chris after the NMIT

scholarship ceremony.

2018: BIG IDEAS START HERE

23

OUR SUSTAINABILITY STORY OUR PEOPLE

OUR ACHIEVEMENTS
THIS YEAR

July 2017 – June 2018

OUR ACHIEVEMENTS

THIS YEAR

July 2017 – June 2018

Our approach to health, safety and wellness is a critical

part of our daily work, as well as our longer-term

thinking, as we believe that a healthy and safe workplace

is all of our team’s responsibility together.

HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELLNESS

OUR FOUR KEY HSW PRINCIPLES:

ENGAGEMENT

We will involve all our team

members in our plans to

improve our health, safety

and wellness performance.

PERFORMANCE

We will actively look to

recognise positive health,

safety and wellness behaviours

and will challenge any

team member who fails to

set the highest personal

standards of health and safety

performance, while continuing

to improve equipment

and infrastructure.

• Continually improving I-safe

functionality and near miss

reporting staying high.

• Water blaster process.

• Winch safety.

• Lone worker safety.

• Lifejackets / water

guard rails.

• Traffic management plans

created for Beatty and

Bullen Street sites.

• Ice tower identified as

a confined space, new

equipment and processes in

place to help manage risk.

• Winch design and

process improvements.

ACCOUNTABILITY

All our team members will

have a clear understanding

of their health, safety and

wellness accountabilities

through clarity of expectations

and ongoing training.

• Bi-annual leadership

and health and safety

representatives’

conferences.

• Engaged a new senior

advisor in health safety

and wellness.

• Expanded cross functional

visits to include reps visiting

other sites.

• 4 reps trained in Incident

Cause Analysis Method

(ICAM) investigation

techniques.

• Stop smoking seminar held

for Processing employees.

• Flu vaccination take-up

almost doubled with

150 carried out this year,

compared to 88 last year.

• Asbestos management

survey and management

plans completed.

• Seismic assessments

completed for all sites.

• New electronic pallet jacks

ordered for Tory Channel

barges that provide back

rest protection for the

operator and are rated to

take the correct weight of

feed bags.

• Fire reviews completed

for all factories.

SYSTEMS & PROCESSES

We will have systems and

processes that manage risk in

the workplace. We commit to

design and engineer high-risk

activities out of our business

wherever possible.

01020304

OUR ACHIEVEMENTS

THIS YEAR

July 2017 – June 2018

OUR ACHIEVEMENTS

THIS YEAR

July 2017 – June 2018

• Monthly internal audit

completion rates increased

by 75% when compared to

the first quarter of 2017.*

• Contractors have been

pre-qualified and moved

towards the implementation

of Rapid Global, an

award-winning workplace

health and safety

software provider.

Our health, safety and wellness strategy (HSW)

is built around four key principles: accountability,

engagement, performance, and systems and

processes. This year, we implemented the

following projects to align with our four principles.

*Monthly internal audit completion rates increased by 75% in Q4, compared to similar period last year (Apr–Jun)

NEW ZEALAND KING SALMON | ANNUAL REPORT FY18

24

OUR SUSTAINABILITY STORY HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELLNESS

ADDRESSING CRITICAL RISK
We have identified six critical risks in our business. This focus on

our critical risks is in line with Worksafe and ACC thinking and

we will investigate further the potential of the Safe+ audit tool

as a way to measure our performance.

This year we took the following improvement actions:

STAYING SAFE AT WORK

We continue to monitor the headline measure of Lost Time

Injury Frequency Ratio (LITFR). This year, the LTIFR remained at

a similar level to previous years at 18.1. However, we continue to

incur less serious LTIs such as slips, trips and manual handling

injuries, that result in less time off work for our team members.

This is displayed by our new severity indicator measure (average

number of days lost from LTI) which continues to drop – from

10.0 to 5.1 over the course of the year.

During the financial year we had two notifiable incidents

reported to Worksafe, one involving a water blaster fire that

fortunately did not result in any significant injury. The second

notifiable incident resulted in a finger injury at one of our sea

farms. While using a winch, one of our team members had their

finger pulled through, partially severing his little finger. The finger

was reattached successfully and the team member returned

initially on light duties to upskill and train, and he is now back

working on full duties as a valued team member. We conducted

a thorough post-incident investigation which has resulted in

the current roll out stage of what we believe is the only guarded

winch in the aquaculture industry.

Frequency rates for near miss notifications remained strong

at 998 in the year, whilst absenteeism continued to improve.

Our absenteeism for FY18 was 2.84%, down from 3.18% in FY17.

We are proud to report a 20% discount on our ACC levies

(improved from last year). In FY18, ACC moved away from

its traditional audit to a performance-based system. This has

shown NZKS to have outperformed our peers within the industry,

whilst the aquaculture industry itself has also exceeded other

comparable industries.

New Zealand

King Salmon

Industry

Peer Group

Risk Management Rate

*

0.240.5

Rehabilitation Rate

**

15.3732.33

*Number of qualifying claims with medical costs greater than $500 (or fatal claims) per $1 million liable earnings in the LRG

**Rehabilitation rate: Number of weekly compensation days for qualifying claims per $1 million liable earnings in the LRG)

Maritime Operations

• Refresher training for skippers.

• Life jacket retesting for self-righting.

• Purchase of Remote Operated Vehicles (ROVs)

to reduce deep diving activity.

Fire, Electricity and Natural Events

• Lone worker device trials completed in our

Takaka freshwater facility, the Bullen Street

factory, and our sea farms.

• Updated process for refuelling water blasters.

• Development of emergency response plans for

sea farms in conjunction with Helicopter Rescue.

• Seismic surveys completed, with improvements

required in our freshwater facilities.

Heights and Lifting

• Working at heights training for Coldstore team.

• Harvest lifting mechanisms (winches) policy

and process reviewed and updated.

• Barge lifting mechanism for feed hatches

reviewed and updated.

• Installation of lifting devices and roof anchors in

cold smoked facility.

• Regular reinforcement of two-person lift and

lifting technique with factory team members.

Confined Spaces

• Installation of Davit crane for factory ice tower.

• Gas detection installed on sea farm barges.

Mobile Plant and Equipment

• Forklift retender incorporated key operator

training requirements and new technology

to manage risk.

• Trialling removal of forklift from harvest vessel.

• Reviewing truck loading process.

Construction Activity

• Review of lock-out tag out completed in

Bullen Street factory.

• Asbestos management plan and

register created.

2018: BIG IDEAS START HERE

25

OUR SUSTAINABILITY STORY HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELLNESS

Caring for our environment is crucial to
our salmon’s well-being, and to protect our

community’s natural resources. Our operations

across the entire supply chain have an impact

on the environment, which we aim to minimise.

INCREASED TRANSPARENCY

Our company aims to be honest and transparent, and we

continually look for better ways to deliver open information

about our activities. Consumers have an increasing interest

in understanding more about the producers of the food they

choose. There is a growing desire for safe food which has been

produced ethically and with care for the environment. We strive

to go beyond compliance, aiming instead for best practice.

Independent monitoring of our salmon farms is carried out by

the Cawthron Institute. A report is available for each farm on

the biochemical and biological state of the seabed, and the

nutrient status of the water column around the farm.

Copper and zinc levels are also measured. Seabed impact is

one of the most common concerns, and we have prioritised

information on this topic. The state of the seabed is assigned

an enrichment score (ES) by Cawthron

1

. We have committed

to the agreed standard of the Best Management Practice (BMP)

threshold of ES5.

A video showing footage from the seabed in Waitata Reach

in 2011 (before our salmon farm was placed there) and from

December 2017, is now available on our website. Stills opposite

show the ES score assigned by Cawthron for a similar period.

They show the life under the seafloor including blue and green

shell mussels, scallops and burrow holes where crustaceans

have hidden.

Our team members now routinely deploy Remote Operated

Vehicles under our marine farms to monitor the benthic

(seabed) and this footage will be uploaded to our website

in future.

ACHIEVING BEST MANAGEMENT

PRACTICES IN OUR REGION

The 2014 ‘Best Management Practice (BMP) guidelines for

salmon farms in the Marlborough Sounds – Benthic’ have already

been incorporated at a number of our farm sites. A review of the

Benthic standards was carried out earlier this year to ensure they

are aligned with latest knowledge.

This year we have incorporated the BMP guidelines in our most

recent resource consent at Te Pangu, and we are committed to

implementing them across all of our remaining sites.

Working with a range of scientists and community stakeholders,

we have now begun to develop the ‘Best Management Practice

OUR ENVIRONMENT

guidelines – Water Quality’ for salmon farms in the Marlborough

Sounds. These are expected to be complete by the end of 2018

and will then be implemented on all our farms. We already

actively contribute to Marlborough District Council-coordinated

Sounds-wide monitoring.

MARINE WILDLIFE

Our company is a member of the King Shag working group.

The King Shag is an endangered species only found in small

numbers in the outer Marlborough Sounds. Unfortunately, a

count carried out in February this year showed a 24% decline

in bird numbers since 2015. Counts by the Department of

Conservation have shown a similar decline.

There is a significant element of uncertainty as to the reasons

for this year’s dramatic decline in numbers for what appears

to have been a relatively long-term stable population. What we

do know is that there have been no dramatic changes in our

operations which could have contributed to the decline and this

is not in dispute. There have been two severe weather events -

cyclones Fehi and Gita and they may be involved. In cooperation

with the working group we intend to work toward a greater

understanding of this species.

Seal interactions are managed by the Department of

Conservation under the Marine Mammals Protection Act 1978

and we require a permit to handle them. We take their safety

very seriously and work hard to protect them.

Some sharks are also protected. Our interactions with sharks

are minimal given the predator protection nets we have

on our farms.

The Marine Mammal and Shark Management Plan and the

King Shag Management Plan are both available on our

company website.

1

ES is the industry-accepted environmental quality standard providing environmental 'bottom lines' against which effects can be assessed.

Our company aims to be honest

and transparent, and we

remain committed to providing

information about our activities.

NEW ZEALAND KING SALMON fi ANNUAL REPORT FY18

26

OUR SUSTAINABILITY STORY OUR ENVIRONMENT

Waste Capture
A project has been started to

look at ways to capture fish

waste before it reaches the

seabed. That work is ongoing

and could potentially add

significant benefits to the way

lower flow sites can be farmed.

WAITATA FARM SEABED

2011

SEABED BEFORE FARM

Estimated average ES score of 1.5-2.51.

1

2018

SEABED AFTER FARM

Estimated average ES score of 3.3 at the edge of the net pens

DNA

New Zealand King Salmon is

supporting an investment in

world-leading technology to

assess the level of enrichment

on the seabed, which will result

in a simplified sampling regime

and more rapid assessment.

FOUR IDEAS TO MANAGE ORGANIC MATTER

Waste Utilisation

Once waste is captured,

end uses for the recovered

waste will be required,

perhaps as fertiliser. An

application has been made to

the Ministry for Environment’s

Waste Minimisation Fund

for a project to explore

potential end uses, which

may result in additional

funding over the company’s

current investment.

Remediation

A project led by the Cawthron

Institute to trial a vacuum

technique on the seabed

under lower flow salmon

farms is proposed and is

currently going through a

consenting process.

1

Based on the estimated ES scores for areas of ‘natural’ seabed in the Marlborough Sounds (MPI 2015).

Unfortunately much of the

Marlborough Sounds has been

damaged by human activity other

than aquaculture (dredging,

trawling and sedimentation).

GREENSHELL AND BLUE MUSSELS

Māori Name: kuku, kūtai

Scientific: Perna canaliculus and

Mytilus edulis aoteanus

As filter feeders, mussels take all their

nutrients from the seawater, and as a

result, loose greenshell and blue mussels

are frequently found under salmon

farms. Blue mussels are abundant in

New Zealand waters but not generally

commercially harvested, whilst

greenshell mussels are farmed.

SILT

Sites selected for

salmon farming

typically have

seabeds composed

of fine sand or clay,

rather than reefs

or other delicate

ecosystems.

BURROW HOLES

Seabed habitats for

crustaceans and

other marine life.

2018: BIG IDEAS START HERE

27

OUR SUSTAINABILITY STORY OUR ENVIRONMENT

Our commitment in
the community is to:

We’re all

about here.

CONTRIBUTE

TO REGIONAL

ECONOMIC

DEVELOPMENT

PRODUCE THE

WORLD’S FINEST

SALMON AND MAKE

OUR COMMUNITY

PROUD

BE A GOOD

NEIGHBOUR AND

COMMUNITY

PARTNER

PARTICIPATE

IN FLAGSHIP

LOCAL FOOD

AND WINE

EVENTS

BUILD

CONSTRUCTIVE

PARTNERSHIPS

WITH IWI AND

LOCAL SUPPLIERS

SUPPORT YOUTH

DEVELOPMENT TO

IMPROVE LIFE IN

THE COMMUNITY

DELIGHT CONSUMERS

WITH KING SALMON

EXPERIENCES

We believe engaging proactively and positively
with our community is crucial. We're proud of

our home in the Top of the South, and we want

to make it even better.

We work hard to be well-regarded and respected in the

community. Although we're a global business, it's important to

us we remain local too. Contributing to the region – and being

collaborative and communicative here – is a part of our DNA.

We are proud of the role we play in the regional economy of the

Top of the South. Salmon farming has an ‘economic multiplier’

effect – it creates work and income for employees, as well as a

raft of local suppliers. We regularly host VIPs in the region and

make sure they see the best the region has to offer.

We now have over 375 shareholders amongst Top of the

South residents and this year we employed our first full-time

sponsorships & events coordinator, based in the Picton office.

In November 2017, we held our first Annual Shareholder Meeting

(ASM) in Blenheim which was followed by a dinner celebrating

our story through food. This event was held at acclaimed

Marlborough restaurant, Arbour, where shareholders joined

Board members and senior management for a degustation

dinner, raising funds for the Graeme Dingle Foundation locally.

SPONSORSHIP AND EVENTS

We support many community organisations, charities and

events, with financial and product sponsorship in Marlborough,

Nelson, Golden Bay and Canterbury.

Environmental and Conservation

We are involved in an increasing number of environmental-based

initiatives that fit with our sustainability ethos in partnership

with organisations such as the Kaipupu Wildlife Sanctuary and

the Mistletoe Bay Foundation.

We also ran our popular ‘Sounds, Salmon and Songbirds’ tours

for the third consecutive year with Marlborough Tour Company

and Kaipupu Wildlife Sanctuary, giving guests a unique

experience in the Sounds.

Education and Youth

We also contribute to projects which support youth development

and education. These include the Graeme Dingle Foundation

KiwiCan Programme, focused on the Picton and Waikawa Bay

primary schools; the Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) scheme at

Marlborough Girls College; the premier Marlborough Girls College

and Golden Bay High School netball teams for their 2017 winter

season; and the Marlborough Boys College first XV rugby team.

We work with schools around the region with educational visits,

in-classroom aquariums and prize giving support as well as a

OUR COMMUNITY

year-round programme with Nelson Marlborough Institute

of Technology.

At the beginning of 2018, we worked with the Environmental

Sustainability Class from Marlborough Girls College to help them

better understand salmon farming in the Marlborough Sounds,

including a class field trip to visit a farm and meet our team.

We also have a Salmon Education Kit which is publicly

available online and in hard copy for all schools to utilise

in lesson planning.

Other Commitments

We have supported disadvantaged groups in Nelson/ Tasman

through the Fifeshire Foundation for a number of years. We also

support education about our industry and the promotion of food

tourism in the Marlborough region as a strategic partner with

Destination Marlborough.

We provide support to several key business and industry

groups, including sponsorship of the Marlborough Chamber

of Commerce (MCOC) Business Awards, the Nelson Business

Awards, the Aquaculture New Zealand Conference, local

Institute of Directors' events and the Nelson Hospitality Awards.

Local Events

Each year we participate in a number of key events in the

Marlborough region, including the Marlborough Wine & Food

Festival, the Picton Maritime Festival, the Havelock Mussel

Festival and Feast Marlborough. At the larger events, we

often provide a celebrity chef to demonstrate salmon recipes.

At the 2018 Marlborough Wine & Food Festival, we had

Annabelle White cook up a storm and Al Brown joined us for

Feast Marlborough’s Friday Night Feast. We also use these events

as a great opportunity to showcase our processing team’s

filleting and pin-boning skills, often encouraging the crowd

to get involved as well.

In September, we opened the doors to the public on our newly

commissioned state-of-the-art feed and accommodation barge

for the Waitata salmon farm in the Pelorus Sound. A naming

ceremony and blessing was conducted by local Te Atiawa iwi

with the barge named ‘Paerangi’ – meaning ‘new horizons’.

Completed in Picton by local contractor, Cuddon Ltd, the barge

is built to blend in with the local environment with muted

camouflage colours and a nautical-style look. In addition to

delivering the required feed to grow the salmon, it also provides

accommodation and facilities for team members.

WORKING WITH IWI

We strive to have good relationships with Te Tau Ihu (Top of

the South) iwi. We collaborate with iwi on a variety of strategic

partnerships and projects, sometimes with formal agreements,

and other times on an informal basis.

A delegation of iwi representatives accompanied a group

to the AquaVision conference in Norway in June.

2018: BIG IDEAS START HERE

29

OUR SUSTAINABILITY STORY OUR COMMUNITY

FROM EGG
TO PLATE

Our operations encompass the

life cycle of the King salmon and

culminate in delivering the highest

quality salmon products to consumers

and chefs around the world.

MARK GILLARD
Since pre-school, I have always been interested in

collecting, looking after and breeding things, especially fish.

On completing my degree in Zoology in the early 1970s,

I went to work in the wild eel fishery for 6 years.

One day I noticed an ad in the paper for someone to manage

an ocean ranching salmon operation on the Clutha River.

I applied and never looked back. I’m not sure that my wife

Heather knew what she was getting herself in to.

The role turned out to be a dream job: leading edge,

independent and with a requirement to get on with everyone

including the local anglers. Eventually I had anglers giving me

their prized salmon for use as broodstock. The small hatchery

I built with the expectation that it would last for only a few

years is still going today and is now owned by Sanford.

From there, I relocated to the Marlborough Sounds to take over

a pilot-scale salmon farm in Hallam Cove in 1985. The Hallam

Cove farms were moved out to Bulwer (Waihinau) in 1989, then

Forsyth and Port Ligar. I was responsible for the design and

build of those farms and for a small hatchery on the banks of

the Onamalutu Stream in Marlborough. That small hatchery

was where our NZKS breeding programme began.

The company then merged with the freshwater farm at Takaka

to form Southern Ocean Seafoods and I moved to the head

office in Nelson in 1994. I have carried out a range of roles and

now look after maintaining and growing our security of tenure

mainly in our seawater aquaculture operations.

MEET ONE OF

OUR PIONEERS

My wife and I have lived on a 30ha block one hour south of

Nelson growing cattle and sheep for over 16 years. I have

travelled to all of the major salmon producing countries

attending various conferences and meetings around the world.

I have been involved in the NZ Salmon Farmers' Association

since its inception in the 70s and was Chair for over 17 years,

as well as a founding board member at Aquaculture NZ.

I have represented aquaculture in one way or another since

my days in Kaitangata, both in company operations and

industry governance. My tenure within the aquaculture industry

is now over 39 years and I am learning as much now as when

I first started - I’m not sure any other industry can match the

opportunity for such a career.

First harvest from Hallam Cove in the 1980s

Hallam Cove

Salmon Farm, 1984

“I’m not sure any other industry

can match the opportunity for

such a career.”

Mark harvesting salmon

eggs, 1980

Mark at Waitata

farm, 2018

NEW ZEALAND KING SALMON | ANNUAL REPORT FY18

32

FROM EGG TO PLATE MEET ONE OF OUR PIONEERS

We have an ongoing commitment in our
freshwater, seawater, processing and

supply chain operations to enhance our

expertise, capability and infrastructure,

whilst managing key risks.

KEY OPERATIONAL

ACHIEVEMENTS

33

2018: BIG IDEAS START HERE

tipped the scales at 15.8kg! As large King salmon, TYEE are tricky
fish to grow and absolutely deserve their “natural wonder”

tag. Our freshwater team is continually improving production

methods and gaining a better understanding of the behaviour

and potential of this unique fish.

Infastructure projects underway in our freshwater facilities

include improving temperature control at the Takaka incubation

facility, particularly over the summer period, but also to improve

the regulation of time of hatch. Our Tentburn hatchery will

benefit from improved load-out facilities for a quality smolt

transfer result.

CEO Grant Rosewarne

hoists a 15 kilogram

TYEE at the ASM dinner

in November 2017

Reconfirming Our Unique Breed

Our freshwater classical breeding programme has been

in place for more than 25 years, and delivers the critical

scientific rigour to our Ōra King breed and brand story.

This year, we partnered with our independent genetic

and aquaculture breeding advisors, Xelect, to re-confirm

the unique traits of our Ōra King salmon breed. Using

state of the art molecular genetics tools, Xelect was able

to accurately and reliably distinguish our breed from

other King salmon strains on the commercial market to

confirm that the strain of fish produced by NZKS is truly

genetically unique and can be designated a “Unique

Breed”. This information protects the integrity of the

brand and should discourage attempts at false marketing.

This year, in addition to our Takaka team managing the longest

established commercial selective breeding programme for

King salmon in the world, our Tentburn team provided the

seawater farms with nearly three million smolt for growout.

These achievements were complemented by another milestone

– with the launch of our ground-breaking Ōra King TYEE grown

and harvested at our Takaka facility.

Over a one-month period in April/May, nearly one million of

our smolt were immunised in freshwater before transfer to sea,

giving them the greatest opportunity to maintain robust health

in the more challenging seawater environment.

Smolt transfer from our Tentburn and Waiau freshwater facilities

to seawater takes place between October and July to ensure

a year-round supply of salmon at an optimum size. The smolt

average 100 – 150 grams at the time of transfer. Various transfers

are made to our Te Pangu, Clay Point, Kopaua, Ruakaka and

Waihinau farms over this period, with larger fish transferred

to the remainder of farms after a period of seawater grow out.

Over the last 12 months, 37 Ōra King TYEE have been supplied

to international customers from our Takaka freshwater facility,

at a minimum weight of 13.6kg (30 pounds). Our largest TYEE

We operate three freshwater

facilities for broodstock, smolt

and as risk mitigation.

FRESHWATER

NEW ZEALAND KING SALMON | ANNUAL REPORT FY18

34

FROM EGG TO PLATE KEY OPERATIONAL ACHIEVEMENTS

Fish performance in the first half of the year was very promising,
however this year’s record-breaking summer temperatures

were extremely challenging for many farmers, whether land

or sea. Our farming teams worked extremely hard to mitigate

the impact, but with above-average water temperatures in the

Pelorus Sound, we did experience heightened fish health and

mortality issues, with the warm water impairing the natural

immune response of the fish, leaving some of them

susceptible to illness.

We implemented management measures including changes

to harvest timing to reduce fish numbers on the more affected

sites, and constant net cleaning activity to ensure that the fish

had the best possible conditions in terms of flow and oxygen

availability. Longer term measures include obtaining higher

flow, colder waters, building warm weather resistance into our

breeding program, ongoing diet improvements, and immunising

our smolt at the freshwater stage.

The larger smolt grown in freshwater have resulted in very

positive production results, reducing the cycle time required

in the seawater phase and delivering excellent growth and fish

quality at harvest.

Regarding infrastructure projects, a state of the art 172-tonne

barge was completed with local engineering firm, Cuddon Ltd.

The barge is equipped with an automatic feeding system

and can carry about 240 tonnes of fish feed to supply our

Waitata sea farm.

We have commenced the capacity upgrade and expansion

in the Pelorus farms (Waitata and Kopa ̄ua), following the

successful completion of three years of positive environmental

results at our new farms.

The final phase of expansion will be the Ngamahau farm

development in the Tory Channel, due for completion in early

2019 with local supplier Cuddon Ltd, which will see additional

pen space installed.

The farm improvement projects are benefiting from more

centralised project co-ordination and the appointment of

specialist Project Managers, as well as ensuring that we capture

the full operational value in the shortest interval possible.

Security of Tenure

Our 35-year sea farm consents at Ngamahau, Waitata and

Kopa ̄ua are about to reach the three-year point at which

incremental volumes can be implemented subject to compliance

with consent conditions. There will be an increase in discharge

of 1,000 metric tonnes of feed for Waitata during 2019, with the

other two farms increased by 500 metric tonnes during 2020.

Meanwhile, a plan change and resource consent application

is underway at Te Pangu which would allow the farm to be

moved closer to the main channel, siting it in a more optimum,

high-flow location.

Our greatest constraint to growth is the availability of suitable

seawater space in New Zealand. In addition to the MPI Farm

Relocation Process, we are contributing to the Marlborough

Environment Plan (MEP) review process, which we understand

will use the outcome of the site relocation process to help inform

its policies and rules. MPI has been working with DoC and MfE

on the National Environmental Standard (NES) for marine

aquaculture to incorporate changes based on submissions

and feedback, and amendments have already been made to

a number of proposed policies. A cost-benefit analysis is being

carried out with a recommendation expected to be provided to

Cabinet early in 2019. All our marine farms have a Biosecurity

Management Plan (BioMP) and we are also working with the

Government to produce a standardised industry BioMP.

Feed Research Update

In 2015, a four-year $5.2 million research programme with the

Cawthron Institute, Seafood Innovations Ltd (SIL) and salmon

feed companies, was undertaken, to ascertain the optimal

diet for our salmon. This year (year three), a series of trials

were conducted to enable us to develop new salmon feed

commercially. These trials have increased the energy in the fish

diet resulting in the same fish growth for less food and less

nitrogenous discharge and/or effluent. In the next financial year

(FY19) the focus will be on determining digestible protein and

energy levels for diets fed at various life stages. The findings from

this research will be trialled in our seafarms in FY19/FY20 with

commercialisation into production thereafter.

Following transfer from freshwater,

salmon are grown for up to 18 months

in one of our seawater farms.

SEAWATER

Wheat

19

%

Fish Meal

18

%

16

%

Veg. Meal

5

%

Veg. Oils

Avian Meal

26

%

Fish Oil

9

%

Avian Oil

2

%

Meat Meal

5

%

Components of feed (1990)

Veg. Oils

17

%

Fish Meal

59

%

24

%

Fish Oil

Components of feed (Current)

Wheat

19

%

Fish Meal

18

%

16

%

Veg. Meal

5

%

Veg. Oils

Avian Meal

26

%

Fish Oil

9

%

Avian Oil

2

%

Meat Meal

5

%

Components of feed (1990)

Veg. Oils

17

%

Fish Meal

59

%

24

%

Fish Oil

Components of feed (Current)

GLOBAL SALMON

AQUACULTURE

(1990)

1

NEW ZEALAND

KING SALMON

(CURRENT)

Percentages are

approximate

and based

on our most

commonly

used feed type.

COMPONENTS

OF FEED

1

Source: Marine Harvest - Salmon Industry handbook 2016.

2018: BIG IDEAS START HERE

35

FROM EGG TO PLATE KEY OPERATIONAL ACHIEVEMENTS

The increased demand for value-added products has
triggered investment in improved slicing technology and

equipment to increase throughput and capacity in our

smoked salmon factories.

At the end of FY18, we installed a new kiln for our Ready to Eat

(RTE) Cold Smoke factory. Amongst many benefits, it will help

to deliver a shorter smoking time and a more consistent smoke

quality. It is environmentally friendly with low energy costs, since

no reheating is required. Our engineering team delivered in time

and under budget.

Hygiene in the factories is a critical food safety factor

and improves shelf life and customer satisfaction. We are

engineering food safety and quality into equipment selection

and process design to ensure that we can increase capacity

without compromising quality and hygiene standards. Project

management and learning from the world’s best are two of the

initiatives rolled out this year to further improve our capability.

Our processing department now has a dedicated project

management and process development expert and a food

safety team that are motivated and committed to best practice.

In general, we are aiming for best practice energy and water

management across our factories, through increased monthly

reporting and a dedicated team developing priority energy

saving projects.

Quality

Quality remains a priority focus in delivering brand value to our

customers. Texture is a key quality indicator and we have recently

invested in equipment to better understand what happens to

the texture of our fish through the processing and supply chain.

Understanding this will help to further improve quality and also

to link results with feed and husbandry decisions. Microbiology

research is helping us improve the shelf life of our products whilst

maintaining safety and high quality. We are also investigating

new freezing technologies and chilled storage to further

enhance our quality.

Salmon are weighed, gilled and gutted.

Depending on final use, further processing

can take place, such as filleting, portioning

or smoking.

PROCESSING

Our salmon are treated to the highest

standards of care, with fish health and

wellness a priority

FISH WELFARE

As a company, we take fish welfare very seriously, and we strive

to keep our salmon healthy and well cared for.

This year, we have invested significantly in our fish welfare team

and associated operational activities to cater for the specific

biology and husbandry needs of our King salmon, and to provide

the highest standards of care.

The focus of our fish welfare team is to continually monitor the

welfare and condition of our salmon to help them cope with

emerging or existing challenges to wellness. Most recently we

introduced routine immunisation programmes for our juveniles

in freshwater to protect them against the naturally occurring

micro-organisms that they will encounter in seawater.

Quality remains a priority

focus in delivering brand

value to our customers.

Salmon are humanely harvested at sea

and transferred back to our processing

facilities in Nelson on the same day.

HARVEST

This year, a decision was made, in accordance with international

best practice, to transfer the harvest function to the quality

team, acknowledging the critical part that harvest plays in the

resultant quality within the factory. This move will help us stay

connected across multiple locations and teams, with the goal

of implementing pre-rigor primary processing, and flow-on

improvements in texture and minimal blood retention.

Since moving to a pump method last year, the harvest team has

seen a steady improvement in quality. A consultant has been

brought on board to further embed our harvesting system and

to look into the next generation of harvesting as our numbers

and fish size increases.

A specialist has also been recruited to help improve the

pneumatics for our stunners which are critical for animal welfare

and quality. Trials are being carried out to understand the rigor

curve to pinpoint optimal processing times, plus we’ve brought

on board a second barge to get our fish to plant quickly.

NEW ZEALAND KING SALMON Ō ANNUAL REPORT FY18

36

FROM EGG TO PLATE KEY OPERATIONAL ACHIEVEMENTS

37
2018: BIG IDEAS START HERE

Our production planning, procurement, customer services,
logistics, coldstore and pick 'n' pack teams ensure our salmon

products get to customers when required, while our ICT

and project management teams ensure we have the right

technology and systems in place to deliver year-round.

Delivering a great final product safely to our consumers and

chefs means taking care of quality throughout the supply

chain. We do this through a range of food safety and quality

controls, as well as core ICT and project management

programs, and the smart and thoughtful use of packaging.

We are also striving to reduce our carbon footprint by utilising

many of the new direct airline routes that have opened

up e.g. Houston and Chicago. Negotiating company-wide

contracts for major consumables and services is also critical

to ensuring quality, cost-effective solutions that meet

our business needs.

Tenders

Three key service contracts negotiated this year were for our

forklifts, laundry and the Omega Plus packaging range.

We focused on the needs of key forklift operators, so that the

chosen supplier delivered health and safety training, compliant

clothing and met the quality standards reflecting our market

position. On-board performance was a non-negotiable,

improving health and safety of drivers and pedestrians.

These systems allow us to reward good driver behaviour

and reduce operating costs.

Sustainability was a key focus for the laundry tender. We

sought better performing garments with a focus on end-of-life

use of garments, as well as ensuring traceability of process to

ensure food safety standards are always met.

With the Omega Plus packaging range, we worked to

ensure this high-spec product could be produced at an

affordable price, as well as adding a second approved

pouch supplier to our stable of packaging suppliers.

IT Upgrades

Over the last 12 months the ICT team has been focused on

improving performance, security and efficiency across the

business. Key projects include:

Client Compute Platform Upgrade (CCPU)

Delivering the latest version of the Microsoft Office

Suite to all computer users to ensure that everyone

has a secure feature-rich set of tools to meet their

work requirements.

Enterprise Resource Planning (Stage 1 Innova)

Installing Innova as our Manufacturing Execution

System (MES) across all factories set the platform

for greater factory efficiencies, ensuring we obtain

the maximum performance benefits from our

specialised factory hardware. Innova is one of the

most sophisticated integrated systems in the world,

establishing our company at the forefront of

New Zealand food manufacturing.

Enterprise Resource Planning (Stage 2 NAV)

Replacement of our Core Financial System (M3) with

Microsoft Dynamic NAV is a substantial project and

impacts every area of the business. Although this

project has not been fully deployed, it is well underway.

NAV will improve our ability to plan, forecast and deliver

to our customers by providing relevant information

to all team members to make better business decisions.

Internet Services Review

With our continued use of cloud-based hosted services

our reliance on quality internet services increases.

This project doubled the capacity of our existing

services to meet our current and future needs and

introduced automatic failover to a secondary location

to ensure business continuity is maintained in the case

of a localised event or natural disaster.

Includes production planning, logistics,

coldstore and pick 'n' pack/dispatch teams,

procurement, customer services, ICT and

project management.

SUPPLY CHAIN

NEW ZEALAND KING SALMON | ANNUAL REPORT FY18

38

FROM EGG TO PLATE KEY OPERATIONAL ACHIEVEMENTS

30
Product development technologists

collaborate with sales, marketing,

operations, and our supply chain team

to develop and launch innovative new

products that suit our customers needs.

NEW PRODUCT

DEVELOPMENT

MANAGING KEY PROJECTS WELL

TOTAL

PROJECTS

TRAINING

SESSIONS

19

ACTIVE

PROJECT

MANAGEMENT

USERS

65

Project Management

Our project management office (PMO) has now been in

operation for a full financial year. The three key focus areas

have been a) raising the basic level of project management

awareness, b) introducing tools to effectively operate multi-sized

change activities, and c) developing a monthly governance and

reporting culture for the 30 largest projects.

A programme manager responsible for overall project visibility

and outcomes has been joined by 3 dedicated project managers

in the business.

Regular project reviews, improved project communication, and

authorisation at key steps in project life-cycles are features of

the new approach. 2019 will reinforce the new approach with

further training and support, as well as an overall program

and portfolio prioritisation.

New product development is a critical element in our brand

leadership program to keep our brands fresh and relevant.

Our product development team has had a productive year

working on over 100 projects with 40 Stock Keeping Units (SKUs)

launched (includes chilled and frozen versions), delivering over

$2.8 million gross margin.

In addition to the development of Ōra King TYEE and the Regal

Manuka range, the team has worked on new glazes to add to

the fresh serve-over range. International interest in our Regal

smoked range has resulted in bespoke ranges, whilst fresh value-

add products have also been developed for North American

foodservice customers. We also collaborated with long-standing

domestic customers to extend existing product offers in

acknowledgment of evolving customer needs and cuisine trends.

Packaging choices have an impact on our commitment to using

resources responsibly. We need to maintain a safe and well-

presented product, whilst caring for the environment. In addition

to a general push to reduce our packaging footprint, the team

is also considering plant-based alternatives to plastic, and

reducing polystyrene usage.

Three years ago, the Omega Innovations division was established

with the specific task of reviewing by-products generated

and seeking out high-value products that would utilise these

materials. The division now comprises four full time team

members including a division manager, a national sales

manager, production coordinator and project manager.

Since then, we have made some fundamental changes to our

by-product and offal management systems. Furthermore, we

have identified products and industries where we see value for

our business. We are currently investing in a project to convert

leftover heads, frames, skins, and trimmings into a convenient

large block for bulk supply to the pet food industry. The project

will identify the equipment and freezing capacity upgrades

required to commercialise such products.

We also continue to explore the opportunity for garden care and

nutriceutical products based on the use of various by-products.

Utilising our by-products to minimise

waste, whilst creating innovative products

to meet a gap in the market.

OMEGA INNOVATIONS

2018: BIG IDEAS START HERE

39

FROM EGG TO PLATE KEY OPERATIONAL ACHIEVEMENTS

A VISION FOR THE FUTURE
In June, we hosted a 25-strong delegation to this year’s

AquaVision conference in Stavanger, Norway. The event has

established itself as the world’s number one conference for the

aquaculture industry. Every second year, top decision makers

gather in Stavanger to discuss aquaculture as it relates to public

policy, and to learn about exciting new technologies which will

ideally position aquaculture to help feed a growing planet while

decreasing the environmental footprint of food production.

AquaVision 2018 and the associated field trips in Norway were

the ideal opportunity for the delegation to hear first-hand

about the potential for growth and the associated challenges

faced by companies, and independently assess what the future

for a sustainable, high-value and healthy protein industry could

look like in regional New Zealand. Our delegation included

senior members from five different iwi, local and central

government representatives, environmental NGOs, media,

and industry groups.

Norway provides an excellent example of how salmon farming

has developed successfully. Norway is a comparable size to

Aquaculture is already the world’s fastest

growing food production industry and

is one of the most efficient forms of food

production, making it a sustainable solution

to feeding our planet. Being a part of this

blue revolution is important to our company.

New Zealand with regards to land mass and population (land

mass 20.8% bigger; population 9.3% bigger), however when

it comes to quality infrastructure and many positive societal

measures, it tends to rank at the top of the OECD countries,

whereas New Zealand is generally positioned further down the

ranking. Norway, with its renowned high standards, already has

a salmon and trout industry almost 100 times our size, with a

plan to move to 400 times our size by 2050. In fact, Norway

is replacing its number one industry – oil and gas, with exports

valued at over NZ$70 billion – with their sustainable wild fishery

and salmon aquaculture.

NEW ZEALAND KING SALMON | ANNUAL REPORT FY18

40

FROM EGG TO PLATE KEY OPERATIONAL ACHIEVEMENTS

41
2018: BIG IDEAS START HERE

STRONG
BRANDS

Our premium

brands tell the

story behind

our products to

our core groups of

customers - discerning

chefs, consumers, retailers

and wholesalers, both here in

New Zealand and worldwide.

Ōra King Awards 2017
Best Dish Australia

by Chris Bonello

OUR BRANDS
The New Zealand King Salmon brand is our corporate brand.

The brand represents our business as a whole, expressing our

vision, purpose, values and culture.

We also communicate with our varied stakeholder groups

through our corporate brand, including our shareholders, our

community, our suppliers, partners and customers.

In all our brand activities, opportunities for more personal

engagement serve us best. Our first annual report brought

to life our story, through our people, our environment and our

product. More informal activities also proved valuable - such

as the post-Annual Shareholders Meeting dinner and Investor

Open Day. These activities added a personal, creative touch

to our investor relations, but also gathered investor feedback

one-on-one.

We have also focused on sustainability and community-specific

communications work this year, as well as a proactive

communications program around the benefits of aquaculture

and the positive future for aquaculture in NZ.

Our approach to communicating with investors was recognised

this year when we were announced as the winner of the NZX

Emerging Leaders Best Investor Relations Award at the 2018

INFINZ (Institute of Finance Professionals NZ Inc) Awards.

We were proud that the judges referred to NZ King Salmon as

“a leading light in the NZ market when it comes to disclosure

and transparency”.

Analysts and investors commented that management are

generous with their time, key operational metrics are provided

to the market and our environmental, social and governance

reporting is very comprehensive.

Our premium brands position our

salmon products in a variety of

high value customer segments,

with in-depth, engaging stories.

Ōra King is our unique breed of King salmon, designed for

culinary excellence. Focused on the premium food service

channel, Ōra King is proudly featured on the menus of more

than 1,200 premium dining restaurants worldwide.

This year, the Ōra King creative team, including our partners

at Downing Creative Marketing, were lauded for various design

projects, including awards for the Ōra King business cards, and

the Ōra King Awards invitation design.

Our flagship campaign - the Ōra King Awards – celebrated its

fifth year as an industry competition offering chefs the chance

to create a special dish using our stunning Ōra King salmon as

the hero ingredient. The Awards ceremony for 2017 was held

in Tokyo to commemorate the first year of participation from

leading Japanese chefs.

To fit the theme, chefs were asked to create a dish with

a Japanese twist. After an initial selection round, the final

contenders were then independently judged by a panel of

leading food experts. With over 300 chefs entering from

our four largest markets, the 2017 Awards were our most

successful to date.

The finalists and Best Ōra King Ambassadors from

New Zealand, Australia and North America were flown

to Tokyo to join Japanese chefs for the Awards ceremony.

A gastronomic tour of Japan included the famed tuna auction

at the world’s largest seafood market, Tsukiji Market, meals at

world-renowned restaurants and visits to traditional artisan

producers. The Japanese finalists were flown to New Zealand

for an equivalent gastronomic tour as well as the opportunity

to experience first-hand how our best-of-breed Ōra King

salmon is grown.

The 6th Annual Ōra King Awards for 2018 were launched in

June with the theme “Inspired by Art”.

NEW ZEALAND KING SALMON | ANNUAL REPORT FY18

44

STRONG BRANDS OUR BRANDS

GETTING ŌRA KING ON THE MENU
An integral part of our strategy is achieving brand recognition

on the menu at premium restaurants using Ōra King. As a

result, chefs and front of house staff can pass on the story of

Ōra King, and diners are then encouraged to seek out Ōra King

by name, achieving greater depth in brand story and greater

loyalty of customer.

This year, we achieved another step in securing approximately

350 new restaurants with Ōra King listed on the menu – with

one stand-out achievement in Australia in a five-star hotel from

a significant international hotel banner group. Ōra King now

features on the menu at this hotel's award-winning flagship

restaurant. With dishes on four set menu options, alongside

bluefin tuna and other high-value seafood, this customer is

now a high-volume user, consuming around 100 kilograms

(20 fish) per week. This example represents an optimal

scenario for linking brand with sales outcomes in a restaurant

environment. The customer had previously purchased Australian

Atlantic salmon, but has now recognised the unique culinary

characteristics of Ōra King for its menu.

ŌRA KING BEST DISH

WINNERS 2017:

Marc Soper

Wharekauhau Country Estate, Wairarapa, New Zealand

Yosuke Kanai

Fleuve, Hotel Granvia, Osaka, Japan

Travis Swikard

Boulud Sud, New York City, USA

Christopher Bonello

MPD Steak Kitchen, Melbourne, Australia

Ōra King Awards Best

Dish North America

winner, Travis Swikard of

Boulud Sud, New York City

Ōra King Awards 2017

NZ Finalists Makoto

Tokuyama, Marc Soper

and Mark McAllister

in Tokyo

“We saw the theme expressed in

the use of Japanese ingredients

produced in New Zealand, such

as wasabi, fresh yuzu and sake,

in classical dishes reinterpreted,

and in seasonal, regional and

historical ideas.”

Geoff Scott, Judge

2018: BIG IDEAS START HERE

45

STRONG BRANDS OUR BRANDS

It is said, that in the old days the ocean felt empty.
So she filled herself with life, and named the salmon her kings.

She hid a portion of these salmon. In dark places she grew

them — where other fish fear to wander. She named these

few Tyee, and set them apart to be kings among kings.

No two Tyee are alike. They have wrestled their way to the

top. Their fins may bear the scars of a life truly lived, the

remnants of frays won, and lost.

Tyee are rare among salmon. No less than 30 pounds in

imperial weight, these salmon are giants — leviathans that

will sear themselves in your mind for years to come.

One of the highlights of the year was the
launch of a world-first innovation - the Ōra

King TYEE. This prized product has been made

available in limited quantities to a fortunate

few discerning chefs and diners worldwide.

The legendary Tyee salmon, caught in the Campbell River of

British Columbia since 1924, is famed in the wild for its size and

rarity. Our long-standing breeding program can now deliver

Ōra King TYEE, a unique King salmon that grows to more than

double the size of an Ōra King salmon - over 13 kilograms.

Unique characteristics of the Ōra King breed combined with the

ideal farming environment have enabled these salmon to grow

to such an incredible size.

With less than 10 fish available for sale each month, all

individually harvested and tagged with identification numbers,

an exclusive group of chefs have experienced Ōra King TYEE

and have remarked on its delicate flavour, distinctive 'bite',

and clean, herbaceous palate.

“The pure size of

the fish made such

a statement in our

kitchen. The Ōra King

TYEE surpassed all

expectations, deeply

marbled yet firm,

this fish ate like

no other.”

Chef Nathan Gould, Boston

Ōra King TYEE steak by

chef Nathan Gould.

Aaron Ballantyne

and Kevin Hopgood

of Hopgood's & Co.,

Nelson

45
%

With over 25 years of leadership in the

salmon category in New Zealand, Regal is our

premium retail brand. We finished the year

with a 45% market share

1

, despite increased

competition from Atlantic salmon. In

addition, our brand awareness has increased

from 85% to 90%

2

amongst smoked salmon

shoppers in New Zealand.

Our major new product launch this year - the Regal Manuka

range in September 2017 - has proven successful, with

excellent consumer and trade feedback. The Regal Double

Manuka Wood Roasted 200g product has been a particular

success story.

We also rolled-out a packaging renovation across the Regal

range to increase the brand presence in store, reinforcing

the brand story and premium positioning. Our sustainability

credentials have been moved to the front of each pack to

emphasise the credibility of our producer story.

Achieving brand clarity in the fresh serve-over is an ongoing

challenge, however this year we reached an agreement with

a retail chain to incorporate Regal branding in the serve-over.

Regal branded fish spikes will highlight the brand to shoppers

demonstrating quality and local provenance. Achieving this

branding equates to a 10% increase in branding penetration

for our business.

In the USA, Regal has been successfully launched in a regional

division of a major supermarket banner. Four cold smoked

products are now present in 129 stores. The range is selling

well, with positive feedback from the trade and consumers.

Work is underway to expand distribution in the USA.

Total Regal branded sales for the last fiscal year are

$28.9m with $3.3m coming from overseas markets - 11.6%.

This represents established sales in Australia as our new

markets have only just commenced.

Our Regal Consumer Panel now has over 1,000 members,

and is a valuable tool for gauging consumer sentiment,

usage and attitudes.

1

IRI, Total Supermarkets, MAT scan data Value Share to 30/06/18

2

Nielsen Brand Health Tracker, April 2018

OVERALL, REGAL IS THE LEADER IN THE

CHILLED SMOKED SALMON CATEGORY

Regal dominates awareness, brand loyalty

measures and brand equity.

90

%

#

1

REGAL TOPS TOTAL

BRAND AWARENESS AT

With our value-brand, Southern Ocean

performing second equal at 54%.

BRAND LOYALTY FOR REGAL

HAS STRENGTHENED OVER

THE PAST THREE YEARS

And there has been a significant rise

in the number of shoppers who would

consider buying Regal.

REGAL LEADS THE CATEGORY IN TERMS

OF THE TOP DRIVERS OF BRAND EQUITY

“Tastes

the best”

“Is a brand

for me and

my family”

“Has the

best quality

salmon”

NIELSEN BRAND HEALTH KEY POINTS

2

REGAL MARKET SHARE

IN SMOKED SALMON

CATEGORY

1

NEW ZEALAND KING SALMON fi ANNUAL REPORT FY18

48

STRONG BRANDS OUR BRANDS

Our major new product launch
this year - the Regal Manuka

range in September 2017 - has

proven successful, with excellent

consumer and trade feedback.

REGAL MANUKA SUCCESS

The three new Regal Manuka smoked products have sold a

combined $2.9 million since launch in September*. Regal brand

sales are also up 19% since launch of the Manuka range.

*Products initially launched in Foodstuffs only; IRI scandata, Total Foodstuffs dollar sales from WE 24/9/17 to 24/6/18

2018: BIG IDEAS START HERE

49

STRONG BRANDS OUR BRANDS

REG AND AL
Regal was back on TV screens after a five year hiatus, with

popular celebrity chef Al Brown and his new seafood connoisseur

mate, Reg the seal. With a tagline of "it's the merroir that makes

the difference" driving the provenance of the Marlborough

Sounds, the distinctive campaign was made up of a TV

advertisement, light box displays near supermarket entrances in

key mall locations, and a digital and social media component.

An external review of the TV advertisement, in addition to

positive feedback from consumers directly, indicated that

the campaign is considered likeable, memorable and unique.

Shoppers thought of high quality, New Zealand origin product

as a result of seeing the ad and recognised that there was a new

Regal Manuka range to look out for in-store. We plan to use Reg

and Al in future campaigns to support new product launches.

NEW ZEALAND KING SALMON | ANNUAL REPORT FY18

50

STRONG BRANDS OUR BRANDS

Positioned as a premium pet food brand with King salmon
as the number one ingredient, Omega Plus is ‘vet quality at

supermarket prices’.

This year, we added wet cat food products to the Omega

Plus range and initial sales have been very strong. The range

now covers wet and dry cat and dog food, with salmon as the

number-one ingredient. High in Omega-3 and protein, the range

delivers a variety of nutritional benefits including a healthy skin

and coat, joint mobility, intestinal health and antioxidants.

Another major area of focus has been to finalise long-term

packaging in the form of fully printed pouches. Distribution

continues to develop positively in the highly competitive retail

channel, with an agreement now in place with another major

supermarket chain for listing once the new packaging is

available. Our retail footprint will then increase to over 100

stores nationally.

Our online customers have developed much faster than

expected, particularly in sales of treats and the salmon oil

dietary supplement. We see good future opportunity in the

online channel for pet products in New Zealand.

We have also been exploring export market opportunities for

Omega Plus this year with key export markets short-listed. China

is our initial focus with the first shipment due to leave later this

year for a large e-commerce customer. We have customised

our packaging to suit the Chinese market requirements.

Market research has also been conducted in North America

to determine brand perception in this market.

Southern Ocean is our value brand, predominantly sold as

smoked salmon products in New Zealand domestic channels.

Southern Ocean is the third most recognised smoked salmon

brand in New Zealand with 54% awareness in the recent

Nielsen study.

With the advent of imported Atlantic salmon in the domestic

market, Southern Ocean has played an important role in

mitigating the new entrants' arrival in the value sector -

maintaining a 17% value share in New Zealand grocery.

1

Our Southern Ocean brand is currently undergoing an

exciting rebrand and range review to increase growth and

brand relevance.

Big Catch is a brand from the Omega Innovations division which

utilises by-products to create salmon burley. By producing a

bacterially inert burley through heat treatment, concerns around

raw materials returning to the marine environment are removed,

representing good biosecurity practice.

Big Catch Salmon Burley delivers a small particle size and

a steady stream of salmon oil as it thaws. It’s perfect for

attracting all types of fish. Big Catch is for the quintessential

Kiwi fisherman who is passionate about the sport and

high-quality burley.

We have now developed a 3kg burley "bomb", which is

now heat-treated, enabling us to explore export and meet

customer demand.

1

IRI, Total Supermarkets, MAT Value Share to 30/06/18

2018: BIG IDEAS START HERE

51

STRONG BRANDS OUR BRANDS

Regal
18

%

New Zealand

King Salmon

(E ectively unbranded)

37

%

35

%

Ōra King

Southern

Ocean

10

%

8

%

Wood

Roasted

Cold

Smoked

Other

3

%

17

%

Whole

Salmon

49

%

23

%

Fillets and

Portions

MARKET GROWTH

AND DEMAND

In anticipation of future growth in production,

identifying and entering new high-value

customer segments in advance is essential to

drive demand. Our world-class sales teams

located in key markets are expert in delivering

relevant and innovative brand solutions to the

right customer and channel.

WITHIN NEW ZEALAND – BALANCING

SUPPLY AND DEMAND

Our continued focus on doubling salmon consumption per

capita within the New Zealand domestic market remains firm.

However, the combination of warmer than usual growing

conditions and higher customer demand meant that orders for

premium locally produced salmon surpassed our ability to supply.

Over the past few years, New Zealanders’ preferences have

evolved, and salmon is now recognised as not only tasty, but

also rich in Omega 3 and a nutritious source of protein alongside

traditional Kiwi favourites like beef and lamb. Across all food

categories, families and restaurants clearly prefer fresh, local

produce and this is particularly the case when it comes

to seafood.

The retail market within New Zealand had one of the strongest

seasonal demand periods that we have seen. Warm weather

patterns in spring and summer created a perfect environment

for home entertainment. This, combined with a great Regal

advertising campaign, saw demand surge into the festive

season. Growth of 36%

1

occurred compared to the same trading

period in 2017.

The foodservice sector also benefited from this weather pattern

and demand for salmon on menus increased significantly.

By mid-summer this increase in demand had outstripped all

available supply. Values firmed across all sectors as the shortage

in supply created an exceedingly strong market.

IMPORTED SALMON ENTERS THE

MARKET

As a result, imported Atlantic salmon proved the only solution

for local customers to keep supplying consumers with a salmon

offer. To maintain our category leadership and emphasise the

premium qualities of our local King salmon, whilst ensuring

continuity of salmon supply to our customers, a decision was

made to incorporate an imported branded salmon offer

in our range.

1

Dec 17 vs Dec 16. Source: IRI Total Supermarkets, Regal dollar growth

SALES BY

BRAND

($ FY18)

SALES BY

PRODUCT

($ FY18)

Retail

32

%

International

Foodservice

47

%

Domestic

Foodservice

21

%

SALES BY

CHANNEL

($ FY18)

NEW ZEALAND KING SALMON | ANNUAL REPORT FY18

52

STRONG BRANDS MARKET GROWTH AND DEMAND

Atlantic salmon is the most common type of salmon
globally and has a lower fat content and a different taste

from our local, premium King salmon. We continue to champion

King salmon as the premium salmon of choice for Kiwi and

international consumers, and our communications are

designed to remind consumers to check before they buy,

and to understand the difference between local King salmon

and imported Atlantic Salmon.

As outlined in previous sections, we have a growth plan to get

more branded Atlantic product on local shelves in the future.

The combination of warmer than

usual growing conditions and

higher customer demand meant

that orders for premium locally

produced salmon surpassed our

ability to supply.

2018: BIG IDEAS START HERE

53

STRONG BRANDS MARKET GROWTH AND DEMAND

29
%

NORTH

AMERICA

NEW

ZEALAND

50

%

7

%

AUSTRALIA

6

%

ASIA

EX JAPAN

5

%

JAPAN

2

%

EUROPE

1

%

CHINA

SALES BY MARKET

($ FY18)

INTERNATIONAL GROWTH

Within North America, we successfully launched our Regal

Smoked Salmon into a division of a nationwide retailer.

Acceptance and customer feedback for the Regal product

in North America confirms that the retail market has enormous

potential. We are actively working to maximise this potential

and this is reflected in the addition of a retail resource based

in North America. We also established a North American

subsidiary company in order to manage the timely distribution

of stock to retail.

Our Ōra King story resonates strongly with the North American

market and we saw further reach over this past year into the

premium and fine dining restaurant sector.

Our market positioning in North America was also

boosted with the launch of our unique product

offering – Ōra King TYEE. The value positioning is aligned

with the most coveted sushi fish species – such as blue

fin tuna. American chefs have been eager early adopters

for our TYEE, and a regular user base has already been

established in the United States.

The Japan team continue to adjust the channel split after

traditionally being a retail orientated market. Our focus with

Ōra King in foodservice has been a slower transition in Japan

but the recent addition of two foodservice focused importers

will expand our reach into the targeted premium dining sector.

The Ōra King Awards are now in the second year in Japan, and

this brand campaign has been instrumental in accessing chefs

and building more enduring relationships.

NEW ZEALAND KING SALMON | ANNUAL REPORT FY18

54

STRONG BRANDS WE ARE DIVERSIFIED

29
%

NORTH

AMERICA

NEW

ZEALAND

50

%

7

%

AUSTRALIA

6

%

ASIA

EX JAPAN

5

%

JAPAN

2

%

EUROPE

1

%

CHINA

Our operations are well

diversified without over

reliance on any one market,

channel, brand or product.

We have developed a

robust formula to achieve

value via our strong

brands, which tell the story

of our King salmon to a

variety of audiences.

Over the past year, our team in Australia have made significant

progress. Local production in Tasmania has undergone some

challenges but demand for salmon has remained strong.

The work we have undertaken over these past years has

positioned us well to lead the market with our brand. Demand

for Ōra King outstripped supply and price returns strengthened

to be at parity with most of our export markets.

China has seen consistent growth over the past year. We have

supported our shareholder, China Resources Ng Fung Limited

by appointing a dedicated Market Manager based in Shanghai

with Primary Collaboration NZ (PCNZ). Our entry into the

China market was initially via the retail sector, but our focus

remains with our Ōra King product in premium restaurants and

foodservice, mainly in Shanghai.

Our European market continues to develop despite constrained

supply. This year, we expanded our fresh whole program with

business into Italy, whilst continuing our premium frozen

program into flagship European customers looking for a

high-quality, convenient sushi input. Well known Michelin star

and Japanese fusion restaurants are now loyal customers.

We anticipate that this region will be an ideal recipient for

branded smoked salmon and high-quality frozen products

in future years.

Surging demand over the past year and a general shortage of

supply has provided an opportunity to review our market mix

throughout the Southern Asian region. We have also supported

this region with a contracted market manager to ensure our Ōra

King story and product is represented all the way to the end user.

2018: BIG IDEAS START HERE

55

STRONG BRANDS WE ARE DIVERSIFIED

DIRECTORS &
MANAGEMENT

JOHN RYDER
Independent Chairman

MCom (Hons), FCA, CMA

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

JACK PORUS

Non-Executive Director

BCom, LLB

THOMAS SONG

Non-Executive Director

FCCA

MARK HUTTON

Independent

Non-Executive Director

BCom

John became a Director of

New Zealand King Salmon

in 2009 and Chair in 2016.

John is an active investor

and company Director, and

his current roles include

Executive Chairman of Alpine

Retirement Group Limited

and Independent Chairman of

Direct Capital IV Management

Limited. John was the

cofounder of NZX listed Ryman

Healthcare Limited (where he

was co-Managing Director)

and was a Director of NZX

listed Michael Hill International

Limited. He was involved in the

initial public offering of both

of these companies. John is a

Chartered Accountant.

Jack has been a Director of

New Zealand King Salmon

since 2008. Jack is Joint

Managing Partner of law firm

Glaister Ennor which he joined

in 1972. Jack has practiced

in all areas of property law,

commercial law, trusts and

estate planning and is an

experienced mediator. Jack

is currently the chairman of

Pinnacle Life Limited and a

Director of Neil Corporation

Limited, Norfolk Financial

Management Limited as well

as other substantial private

businesses, and is a trustee

of numerous personal and

charitable trusts. Jack is a

nominated appointee for

major New Zealand King

Salmon shareholder, Oregon

Group Limited.

Thomas has been a Director

of New Zealand King Salmon

since 2008. Thomas is

Managing Director of major

New Zealand King Salmon

shareholder, Oregon Group

Limited. In this role Thomas

is also the Chairman of Neil

Corporation Limited and

Winstone Pulp International

Limited. Thomas is a fellow

member of the Association

of Chartered Certified

Accountants (UK).

Mark became a Director of

New Zealand King Salmon

in 2008. He is a founding

partner of Direct Capital. Mark

has a background in private

equity, specialising in portfolio

management with a focus on

strategy, growth and capital

funding. Mark is currently

a Director for a number of

Direct Capital entities. Mark

is also Director of NZX listed

Scales Corporation and

a Director of investment

company Evergreen Partners

Limited. Mark is also Chair

of our Nominations and

Remunerations Committee.

Our Board brings many years of

experience in salmon farming,

processing and marketing alongside

broader business experience in

New Zealand and internationally.

NEW ZEALAND KING SALMON - ANNUAL REPORT FY18

58

DIRECTORS AND MANAGEMENT BOARD OF DIRECTORS

PAUL STEERE
Independent

Non-Executive Director

XIN WANG

Non-Executive Director

MBA, Bs

NELSON LIU

Alternate Director to Xin Wang

MBA

GRANT ROSEWARNE

Managing Director and CEO

MBA (Executive), BAppSc

Paul was the founding CEO

of New Zealand King Salmon

from its formation in 1996 until

2009 and has been a Director

of New Zealand King Salmon

since 2009. He is Chair of the

Audit and Risk Committee.

Paul has a background in

manufacturing, international

trade and fast-moving

consumer goods having

previously held senior

executive positions with a

British multinational including

in Hong Kong and Singapore

before joining the NZ Dairy

Board as a General Manager

for eight years which included

responsibility for major

product lines and aligned

regional global markets.

Paul is currently Chairman

of Nelson Airport Limited,

Deputy Chair and Councillor

of Nelson Marlborough

Institute of Technology and a

Chairman of other substantial

private businesses in wine

and architectural facades. He

chairs an advisory committee

for advancing aquaculture in

the South Pacific Community

which supports initiatives

funded by NZ MFat. He served

on the National Board of New

Zealand Red Cross and its

Foundation from 2003 to 2013.

Xin became a Director in 2017.

Xin is the General Manager of

the Corporate Strategy and

Development Department at

China Resources Enterprise,

Limited. Xin was previously the

Assistant General Manager

of China Resources Ng Fung

Limited, in charge of strategy

and corporate development.

She joined China Resources

Group in 2010. Prior to that,

she was with McKinsey &

Company. She holds a B.S.

degree from Fudan University,

an MBA degree from Kellogg

Business School, Northwestern

University and a Master’s

degree from the University of

Illinois in Chicago.

Nelson Liu brings to New

Zealand King Salmon his

vast experience in the ports

and logistics industries. He

was previously an Executive

Director of China Merchants

Holdings International

Company Limited (a Hong

Kong Hang Seng Index

constituent stock company),

which was primarily involved

in the investment and

management of ports,

terminals and logistics parks.

Nelson is presently a Director

of the Port of Newcastle,

Australia. He holds a Master

of Business Administration

from the Roosevelt

University in USA.

Grant started his career

in technical roles having

completed a degree in

Chemistry and Microbiology.

He went on to gain

considerable international

consumer goods sales,

marketing and general

management experience. He

has worked across a number

of consumer goods categories

including dairy, wine, fresh

produce, and dry grocery as

well as foodservice segments

from cafes to fine dining.

Grant’s international business

expertise spans Britain, Europe

and Australasia, with blue chip

companies such as Unilever,

Cerebos and Douwe Egberts /

Sara Lee.

Grant was appointed CEO of

New Zealand King Salmon in

2009. During his time as CEO,

Grant has focused on lifting

New Zealand King Salmon’s

unique products from a

premium commodity to a

worldwide branded

food delicacy.

2018: BIG IDEAS START HERE

59

DIRECTORS AND MANAGEMENT BOARD OF DIRECTORS

SENIOR LEADERSHIP TEAM
GRANT ROSEWARNE

Managing Director and CEO

See previous page.

DAVID WHYTE

Chief Operating Officer

A marine biologist by training, David

has more than 30 years’ experience

in the aquaculture industry. He joined

New Zealand King Salmon to lead the

aquaculture and processing operations

teams, after more than a decade working

in Tasmanian salmon farming.

During his time in Australia, David led

business improvement projects on feed,

technology, planning, customer service,

third party certification, new species

diversification and new lease acquisition.

Prior to this he worked in technical and

commercial management roles in

Marine Harvest Scotland, Biomar UK

and AKVA Group.

ANDREW CLARK

Chief Financial Officer

Andrew has more than two decades

of finance experience across leading

New Zealand aquaculture and dairy

businesses. He has occupied many senior

finance roles in the United States, New

Zealand, Venezuela and Uruguay.

Andrew is passionate about growing New

Zealand’s exports and supporting regional

development. After working overseas for

many years, he has seen first-hand the

huge potential for New Zealand premium

food and beverages globally.

Andrew joined New Zealand King

Salmon in 2011.

NEW ZEALAND KING SALMON | ANNUAL REPORT FY18

60

DIRECTORS AND MANAGEMENT SENIOR LEADERSHIP TEAM

JEMMA MCCOWAN
General Manager, Marketing

Jemma joined New Zealand King Salmon

in 2012 to launch Ōra King, our premium

foodservice brand, in New Zealand and

abroad. Jemma’s team now manages the

marketing and product development for

New Zealand King Salmon’s multiple retail

and foodservice brands globally.

Jemma is an unashamed champion

of New Zealand produce and believes

most Kiwis don’t realise the full value of

what the country offers on the global

stage. During her time at New Zealand

King Salmon, she has played a lead role

in taking the company’s brands to new

global markets as well as the business’

sustainability projects.

Prior to joining New Zealand King Salmon,

Jemma spent fifteen years working in

international business development and

marketing for an Australian seafood

exporter and the Australian Trade

Commission (Austrade).

GRAEME TREGIDGA

General Manager, Sales

Graeme started his career working for his

family’s horticultural business. He is the

first to admit that since then, working in

primary produce has got under his skin.

Prior to joining New Zealand King Salmon

in 2004, Graeme spent 16 years working

in various horticulture roles in processing,

domestic and international sales,

and management.

Graeme is passionate about taking New

Zealand’s products to the world and has

seen first-hand the value of telling strong

brand stories about New Zealand primary

products. He has been a central part

of growing New Zealand King Salmon’s

exports throughout Japan, North

America, Australia, China and South-East

Asia, as well as growing sales in

New Zealand.

SHAUN YOUNG

General Manager, Supply Chain

During the last decade, Shaun has worked

at New Zealand King Salmon across a

range of special projects and sales roles

in Auckland and Nelson. As General

Manager, Supply Chain, Shaun now leads

the company’s planning, procurement,

customer service, logistics and ICT teams.

His team coordinates shipping fresh

King Salmon around the world; including

getting product from the top of New

Zealand’s South Island to New York

almost every day of the year.

Prior to working for New Zealand King

Salmon, Shaun worked for Cadbury and

Goodman Fielder in sales management

and analytical roles.

2018: BIG IDEAS START HERE

61

DIRECTORS AND MANAGEMENT SENIOR LEADERSHIP TEAM

FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS

1 JULY 2017 - 30 JUNE 2018

Statement of comprehensive income 64
Statement of financial position 65

Statement of changes in equity 66

Statement of cash flows 67

Notes to the financial statements 68

1. Corporate information 68

2. Basis of preparation 68

3. Summary of significant accounting policies 69

4. New standards and interpretations not yet adopted 73

5. Segment information 74

6. Other income 75

7. Expenses 75

8. Financing income and costs 75

9. Income tax 76

10. Components of other comprehensive income 77

11. Earnings per share 77

12. Cash and cash equivalents 77

13. Trade and other receivables 78

14. Inventories 78

15. Biological assets 79

16. Property, plant and equipment 80

17. Intangibles 81

18. Non-current assets held for sale 81

19. Interest bearing loans and borrowings 82

20. Trade and other payables 82

21. Employee benefits 82

22. Commitments and contingencies 83

23. Financial risk management 83

24. Fair values of financial instruments 86

25. Capital management 86

26. Capital and reserves 87

27. Events after balance date 88

28. Related party disclosures 88

29. Auditor’s remuneration 89

30. Reconciliation of net operating cash flow to profit/(loss) 89

31. Comparison to prospective financial statements 90

Independent Auditor’s Report 94

Corporate Governance 98

Director Disclosures 115

Corporate Directory 119

Glossary 120

From Egg to Plate 121

CONTENTS

2018: BIG IDEAS START HERE

63

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTENTS

STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2018

20182017

Note$000$000

Revenue5160,271 136,351

Cost of goods sold14(145,320) (119,879)

Fair value gain on biological transformation1550,309 54,845

Freight costs to market(15,212) (13,360)

Gross profit50,048 57,957

Other income61,822 2,574

Sales, marketing and advertising expenses(10,381) (8,748)

Distribution overheads(3,348) (2,993)

Corporate expenses7(9,312) (7,261)

Other expenses7(347) (2,996)

Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation28,482 38,533

Depreciation and amortisation expense16, 17(5,105) (4,366)

Finance income8198 188

Finance expenses8(888) (1,990)

Profit before tax22,687 32,365

Income tax expense9(6,562) (9,601)

Net profit after tax16,125 22,764

Other comprehensive income

Foreign currency translation differences10120 12

Net movement on cash flow hedges10(2,571) 6,063

Income tax effect of movement on cash flow hedges10721 (1,700)

Share based payment expense10263 142

Net other comprehensive income/(loss that will subsequently reverse through profit or loss)(1,467) 4,517

Total comprehensive income/(loss)14,658 27,281

Earnings per share

Basic earnings per share11 $0.12 $0.16

Diluted earnings per share11 $0.12 $0.16

NEW ZEALAND KING SALMON | ANNUAL REPORT FY18

64

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION
AS AT 30 JUNE 2018

DIRECTOR

28 August 2018

DIRECTOR

28 August 2018

For and on behalf of the Board, who authorised the issue of these financial statements on 28 August 2018.

20182017

ASSETSNote$000$000

Current assets

Cash and cash equivalents1214,428 10,647

Trade and other receivables1312,426 11,688

Inventories1416,582 16,674

Biological assets1571,566 68,556

Non-current assets held for sale- 421

Derivative financial assets241,057 2,066

Total current assets116,059 110,052

Non-current assets

Property, plant and equipment1643,722 35,726

Biological assets157,888 10,960

Derivative financial assets241,884 3,196

Deferred tax asset92,052 1,636

Intangible assets175,114 3,687

Goodwill1739,255 39,255

Total non-current assets99,915 94,460

TOTAL ASSETS215,974 204,512

LIABILITIES

Current liabilities

Trade and other payables2013,924 13,282

Employee benefits213,384 3,028

Borrowings19461 414

Other financial liabilities2846 18

Derivative financial liabilities241,189 1,277

Taxation payable4,902 2,285

Total current liabilities23,906 20,304

Non-current liabilities

Employee benefits21473 451

Borrowings1910,000 10,124

Deferred tax liabilities913,995 14,010

Derivative financial liabilities241,299 948

Total non-current liabilities25,767 25,533

TOTAL LIABILITIES49,673 45,837

NET ASSETS166,301 158,675

EQUITY

Share capital26122,579 122,518

Reserves328 1,795

Retained earnings43,394 34,362

TOTAL EQUITY166,301 158,675

Net tangible assets per share

Net tangible assets per share $1.22 $1.15

2018: BIG IDEAS START HERE

65

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION

STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2018

Share

Capital

Foreign

Currency

Translation

Reserve

Hedge

Reserve

Share

Based

Payment

Reserve

Retained

Earnings

Total

Equity

Note$000$000$000$000$000$000

Balance as at 1 July 2017122,518 (515) 2,168 142 34,362 158,675

Profit for the period- - - - 16,125 16,125

Other comprehensive income/(loss)10- 120 (1,850) 263 - (1,467)

Total comprehensive income/(loss) for the period- 120 (1,850) 263 16,125 14,658

Shares issued2661 - - - - 61

Distribution to shareholders26- - - - (7,093) (7,093)

Balance as at 30 June 2018122,579 (395) 318 405 43,394 166,301

Balance as at 1 July 201625,296 (527) (2,195) - 14,440 37,014

Profit for the period- - - - 22,764 22,764

Other comprehensive income/(loss)10- 12 4,363 142 - 4,517

Total comprehensive income/(loss) for the period- 12 4,363 142 22,764 27,281

Increase in share capital in preparation for IPO2668,914 - - - - 68,914

Shares issued2630,105 - - - - 30,105

Transaction costs arising on share issue26(1,797) - - - - (1,797)

Distribution to shareholders26- - - - (2,842) (2,842)

Balance as at 30 June 2017122,518 (515) 2,168 142 34,362 158,675

NEW ZEALAND KING SALMON | ANNUAL REPORT FY18

66

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY

STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2018

20182017

Note$000$000

Operating activities

Receipts from customers161,212 135,163

Payments to suppliers(97,453) (97,428)

Payments to employees(35,029) (30,268)

Interest received164 181

Interest paid(597) (1,317)

Insurance and settlement income150 1,998

Income tax paid(3,609) (2,999)

Net cash flows from / (used in) operating activities3024,838 5,330

Investing activities

Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment19 29

Purchase of property, plant and equipment(14,022) (7,449)

Purchase of intangible assets(88) (48)

Net cash flow (used in) / from investing activities(14,091) (7,468)

Financing activities

Drawdown of revolving loan124 (8,876)

Government grants received148 110

Gross proceeds from share issue42 30,105

Transaction costs arising from share issue- (1,797)

Proceeds from shareholder advances- 1,402

Repayment of shareholder advances(89) (7,651)

Payment of finance lease liabilities(98) (85)

Dividends paid(7,093) (2,842)

Net cash flows (used in) / from financing activities(6,966) 10,366

Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents3,781 8,228

Cash and cash equivalents at 1 July1210,647 2,419

Cash and cash equivalents at 30 June1214,428 10,647

2018: BIG IDEAS START HERE

67

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

NOTES TO THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2018

1. CORPORATE INFORMATION

The financial statements of New Zealand King Salmon Investments Limited (the Company) and its subsidiaries (together the Group)

for the year ended 30 June 2018 were authorised by the directors on 28 August 2018.

New Zealand King Salmon Investments Limited is a profit-orientated company incorporated and domiciled in New Zealand.

The Company is registered under the Companies Act 1993 and listed on the NZX Main Board (“NZX”) and the Australian Securities

Exchange (“ASX”). The Company is an FMC reporting entity under the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013.

The Group is principally engaged in the farming, processing and sale of premium salmon products.

2. BASIS OF PREPARATION

a. Statement of compliance

The consolidated financial statements comply with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and also with New Zealand

Equivalents to International Financial Reporting Standards (NZ IFRS).

b. Basis of measurement

The financial statements have been prepared on a historical cost basis except for biological assets and financial instruments which

have been measured at fair value.

c. Significant accounting judgements, estimates and assumptions

The preparation of the Group’s consolidated financial statements requires management to make judgements, estimates

and assumptions that affect the reported outcomes of revenues, expenses, assets, liabilities and the accompanying disclosures.

The Group based its assumptions and estimates on parameters available when the consolidated financial statements were prepared.

Uncertainties about these assumptions and estimates could result in an outcome that requires a material adjustment to the carrying

amount of assets or liabilities in future periods.

Specific areas requiring significant estimates and judgements include:

Valuation of biological assets

The Group recognises stocks of live fish at fair value less costs to sell according to the principles of NZ IAS 41 Agriculture. The fair value

is measured using a valuation model that relies on various assumptions and information available at balance date. Inputs include

anticipated market prices, quality mix, current weights of livestock relative to expected harvest weight, mortality rates, growth rates

and production costs. The income or loss that is ultimately recognised at time of sale may be significantly different from that implied

by the fair value adjustment at the end of a reporting period. The fair value uplift from accumulated costs to date has no cash impact.

Further details of the valuation and sensitivity to change in key inputs are given in note 15.

Impairment testing of intangibles

The Group reviews the carrying value of goodwill on an annual basis and assesses whether it is impaired according to the principles

of NZ IAS 36 Impairment of Assets. This requires the goodwill to be allocated to cash generating units with which it would naturally be

associated and the value in use of the cash generating units to be estimated. The value in use is estimated using a standard industry

model that relies on various assumptions and information available at balance date. Inputs include estimations of the growth rate of

the Group, future market conditions, prices, and discount rates. Further details of the value in use assessment are given in note 17.

Valuation of financial derivatives

The Group recognises financial derivatives at fair value according to the principles of NZ IFRS 13 Fair Value Measurement. The value is

calculated by a third party expert using an industry standard model. Inputs to the model are obtained externally by the service provider.

Further details of the valuation are included in note 24.

Useful lives of assets

The Group estimates the useful lives of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets based on historical performance and

currently consented future asset uses.

NEW ZEALAND KING SALMON | ANNUAL REPORT FY18

68

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

d. Foreign currency translation
Functional and presentation currency

The Group’s consolidated financial statements are presented in New Zealand dollars, which is also the parent Company’s functional

currency. The Australian subsidiary’s functional currency is Australian dollars which is translated into the presentation currency in these

financial statements. The USA subsidiary’s functional currency is United States dollars which is translated into the presentation currency

in these financial statements.

Transactions and balances

Transactions in foreign currencies are initially recorded in the functional currency by applying the exchange rates ruling at the date of the

transaction. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are retranslated at the rate of exchange at balance date.

Non-monetary items that are measured in terms of historical cost in a foreign currency are translated using the exchange rate as at the

date of the initial transaction. Non-monetary items measured at fair value in a foreign currency are translated using the exchange rates

at the date when the fair value was determined.

Translation of Group subsidiaries functional currency to presentation currency

The assets and liabilities of both the Australian and USA subsidiaries are translated into New Zealand dollars at the rate of exchange

at balance date. Revenues and expenses are translated at rates approximating the exchange rate at the date of the transaction.

The exchange differences arising on translation for consolidation are recognised in other comprehensive income.

3. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICIANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

a. Basis of consolidation

The financial statements comprise the financial statements of New Zealand King Salmon Investments Limited and its subsidiaries

(per note 28) as at 30 June each year. Subsidiaries are all those entities over which the Company has control.

The financial statements of the subsidiaries are prepared for the same reporting period as the Parent company using consistent

accounting policies.

In preparing the consolidated financial statements, all intercompany balances and transactions, income and expenses and profit

and losses resulting from intra-group transactions have been eliminated in full.

Subsidiaries are fully consolidated from the date on which control is obtained by the Group and cease to be consolidated from the

date on which control is transferred out of the Group.

b. Business combinations

Business combinations are accounted for using the acquisition method. The consideration transferred in a business combination is

measured at fair value which is calculated as the sum of the acquisition date fair value of assets acquired by the Group and the liabilities

assumed by the Group. Acquisition related costs are expensed as incurred and included in administrative expenses. Any contingent

consideration to be transferred by the Group is recognised at fair value at acquisition date.

c. Financial instruments

All financial instruments are initially recognised at the fair value of the consideration received, less directly attributable transaction costs

in the case of financial assets and liabilities not recorded at fair value through profit or loss. Subsequently the Group applies the following

accounting policies for financial instruments:

Cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents in the balance sheet comprise cash at bank and call deposits. For the purpose of the statement of cash flows,

cash and cash equivalents consist of cash and short-term deposits net of outstanding bank overdrafts.

Trade and other receivables

Short term trade and other receivables are not discounted and are initially stated at cost. Gains and losses are recognised in the profit

or loss when the receivables are derecognised or impaired.

Loans

Loans and amounts owing from related companies are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that

are not quoted in an active market. After initial recognition such assets are carried at amortised cost using the effective interest

method. Gains and losses are recognised in profit or loss when the loans are derecognised or impaired.

Trade and other payables

Trade and other payables are carried at cost due to their short term nature and are not discounted. They represent liabilities for goods

and services provided to the Group prior to the end of the financial year that are unpaid and arise when the Group becomes obliged to

make future payments in respect of the purchase of these goods and services. The amounts are unsecured and are usually paid within

30-60 days of recognition.

Interest bearing borrowings

After initial recognition interest bearing borrowings are subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method.

Fees paid on establishment of loan facilities that are yield related are included as part of the carrying amount. Borrowings are classified

as current liabilities unless the Group has an unconditional right to defer settlement of the liability for at least 12 months after the

2018: BIG IDEAS START HERE

69

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

balance date. Borrowing costs are generally recognised as an expense when incurred with the exception of borrowing costs associated
with a qualifying asset which are capitalised as part of the cost of that asset.

Financial guarantee

Financial guarantee contracts issued by the Group are those contracts that require a payment to be made to reimburse the holder

for a loss it incurs because the specified debtor fails to make a payment when due in accordance with the terms of a debt instrument.

Financial Guarantee contracts are recognised initially as a liability at fair value, adjusted for transaction costs that are directly attributed

to the issuance of the guarantee. Subsequently the liability is measured at the higher of the best estimate of the expenditure required

to settle the present obligation at balance date and the amount recognised less cumulative amortisation.

Derivative financial instruments and hedging

The Group uses derivative financial instruments including forward currency contracts, options and interest rate swaps to hedge risks

associated with interest rate and foreign currency fluctuations. Such derivative financial instruments are initially recognised at fair value

on the date on which a derivative contract is entered into and are subsequently re-measured to fair value at balance date. Derivatives

are carried as assets when their fair value is positive and as liabilities when their fair value is negative.

The fair values of forward currency contracts are calculated by reference to current forward exchange rates for contracts with similar

maturity profiles. The fair values of interest rate swaps are determined by reference to market values for similar instruments.

The Group designates its derivative financial instruments as hedges of a particular risk associated with a recognised asset or liability

or a highly probable commitment that could affect profit or loss. The effective portion of the gain or loss on the hedging instrument

is recognised directly in other comprehensive income in the hedge reserve, while the ineffective portion is recognised in profit or loss

as other income or expenses.

Amounts accumulated in equity are transferred to profit or loss when the hedged item affects profit or loss.

d. Inventories

Inventories including raw materials, work in progress and finished goods are valued at the lower of cost or net realisable value.

Costs incurred in bringing each product to its present location and condition are accounted for as follows:

Raw materials – the cost of fish is measured at fair value at harvest date. The cost of other raw materials is based on the purchase

price including import duties and other taxes, transport, handling and other costs directly attributable to the acquisition of the goods

and materials. Costs are determined on a weighted average basis.

Manufactured finished goods and work in progress - cost of direct materials, labour and a proportion of manufacturing overheads

appropriate to the state of manufacture. Costs are assigned on the basis of weighted average costs. The cost of items transferred from

biological assets is their fair value less costs to sell at the date of harvest.

Net realisable value - the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business less estimated costs of completion and the estimated

costs necessary to make the sale.

e. Biological assets

Biological assets include fish livestock measured at fair value less estimated costs to sell. The net gain or loss resulting from the fair

value measurement is recognised in profit or loss.

The fair value of fish livestock is derived from the amount expected to be received from the sale of the asset in an active market.

The target live weight of the harvestable fish is defined as a fish with a live weight of 4kg or greater. Many fish are harvested with a live

weight above or below this weight.

For brood stock and fish where little biological transformation has taken place since initial cost was incurred, cost less impairment

is used as an approximation of fair value. This value is used up to the point at which fish are transferred to sea water. Fish stock is

transferred to inventory at the time of harvest. The transfer is recorded at its fair value which is deemed to be cost for the purposes

of inventory valuation.

f. Property, plant and equipment

Property, plant and equipment are stated at historical cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment. Depreciation is provided

on a straight line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets as follows:

Freehold land not depreciated

Freehold buildings twenty to fifty years

Building fit out three to twenty five years

Leasehold improvements five to ten years

Plant, furniture and fittings three to twenty years

Motor vehicles five years

Sea vessels ten to twenty years

The residual values, useful lives and methods of depreciation of property, plant and equipment are reviewed at each financial year end

and adjusted prospectively if appropriate. An asset’s carrying value is written down immediately to its recoverable amount if its carrying

value is greater than its estimated recoverable amount.

NEW ZEALAND KING SALMON ff ANNUAL REPORT FY18

70

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

An item of property, plant and equipment is derecognised upon disposal or when no further future economic benefits are expected
from its use or disposal. Any gain or loss arising on de-recognition of the asset (calculated as the difference between the net disposal

proceeds and the carrying amount of the asset) is included in profit or loss in the year the asset is derecognised.

g. Leases

The determination of whether an arrangement is or contains a lease is based on the substance of the arrangement and requires an

assessment of whether the fulfilment of the arrangement is dependent on the use of a specific asset or assets and the arrangement

conveys a right to use the asset.

Group as a lessee

A lease is classified at the inception date as a finance lease or an operating lease. Finance leases, which transfer to the Group

substantially all the risks and benefits incidental to ownership of the leased item, are capitalised at the inception of the lease at the

fair value of the leased asset or, if lower, at the present value of the minimum lease payments. Lease payments are apportioned

between the finance charges and reduction of the lease liability so as to achieve a constant rate of interest on the remaining balance

of the liability. Finance charges are recognised as an expense in profit or loss.

Capitalised leased assets are depreciated over the shorter of the estimated useful life of the asset and the lease term if there is no

reasonable certainty that the Group will obtain ownership by the end of the lease term.

Operating lease payments are recognised as an expense in profit or loss on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Lease incentives

are recognised in profit or loss as an integral part of the total lease expense.

h. Intangibles

Intangible assets acquired separately or in a business combination are initially measured at cost. The cost of an intangible asset acquired

in a business combination is its fair value as at the date of acquisition. Following initial recognition intangible assets are carried at cost

less any accumulated amortisation and any accumulated impairment losses. Internally generated intangible assets are not capitalised

and the expenditure is recognised in profit or loss in the year in which the expenditure is incurred.

The useful lives of intangible assets are assessed to be either finite or indefinite. Intangible assets with finite lives are amortised over

the useful life and tested for impairment whenever there is an indication that the intangible asset may be impaired. The amortisation

period and the amortisation method for an intangible asset with a finite useful life is reviewed at least at each financial year-end.

Changes in the expected useful life or the expected pattern of consumption of future economic benefits embodied in the asset are

accounted for prospectively by changing the amortisation period or method, as appropriate, which is a change in accounting estimate.

The amortisation expense on intangible assets with finite lives is recognised in profit or loss in the expense category consistent with the

function of the intangible asset.

Intangible assets with indefinite useful lives are not amortised but are tested for impairment annually, either individually or at the

cash-generating unit level. The assessment of useful life is reviewed annually to determine whether the indefinite life continues to be

supportable. If not, the change in useful life from indefinite to definite is made on a prospective basis.

A summary of the policies applied to the Group’s intangible assets is as follows:

Goodwill and trade marks

Useful lives: Indefinite

Internally generated or acquired: Acquired

Intellectual property, marine farm and hatchery licences and marina berth

Useful lives: Finite

Amortisation method used: Straight line, five to thirty five years

Internally generated or acquired: Acquired

Computer Software

Useful lives: Finite

Amortisation method used: Straight line, four to seven years

Internally generated or acquired: Acquired

i. Research and development costs

Research costs are generally expensed as incurred. Development expenditures are capitalised as intangible assets when the Group

can demonstrate:

- Costs can be reliably measured.

- Completion of the project is technically feasible.

- Resources are available to complete the project.

- There is an intention to use the resulting asset and it will generate future economic benefits.

During the period of development the asset is tested for impairment annually.

2018: BIG IDEAS START HERE

71

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

j. Employee benefits
Wages, salaries, annual leave and sick leave

Liabilities for wages and salaries including non-monetary benefits, annual leave and accumulating sick leave expected to be settled

within 12 months of the reporting date are recognised in respect of employees’ services up to the reporting date. They are measured

at the amounts expected to be paid when the liabilities are settled. Liabilities for non-accumulating sick leave are recognised when

the leave is taken and are measured at the rates paid or payable.

Long service leave

The liability for long service leave is recognised and measured at the present value of expected future payments to be made in respect

of services provided by employees up to the reporting date using the projected unit credit method. Consideration is given to expected

future wage and salary levels, experience of employee departures and periods of service.

Defined contribution plans

Contributions made to a defined contribution plan are expensed as incurred.

k. Contributed equity

Ordinary shares

Ordinary shares are classified as equity. Incremental costs directly attributable to the issue of new shares or options are shown in

equity as a deduction net of tax from the proceeds. Other capital raising costs are expensed as incurred.

l. Revenue Recognition

Revenue is recognised and measured at the fair value of the consideration received or receivable to the extent it is probable that the

economic benefits will flow to the Group and the revenue can be reliably measured. The following specific recognition criteria must also

be met before revenue is recognised:

Sale of goods

Revenue is recognised when the significant risks and rewards of ownership of the goods have passed to the buyer and the costs

incurred or to be incurred in respect of the transaction can be measured reliably. Risks and rewards of ownership are passed to the

buyer depending on the agreed shipping terms. This is typically when legal ownership is passed over.

Interest income

Revenue is recognised as interest accrues using the effective interest method.

Insurance proceeds

Insurance proceeds are recognised in the financial statements when receipt is virtually certain and can be measured reliably.

m. Taxes

Income taxes

Current tax assets and liabilities for the current and prior periods are measured at the amount expected to be recovered from or paid

to the taxation authorities based on the current period’s taxable income. The tax rates and tax laws used to compute the amount are

those that are enacted or substantively enacted by the balance sheet date.

Deferred income tax is provided on all temporary differences at the balance sheet date between the tax bases of assets and liabilities

and their carrying amounts for financial reporting purposes.

The carrying amount of deferred income tax assets is reviewed at each balance sheet date and reduced to the extent that it is no longer

probable that sufficient taxable profit will be available to allow all or part of the deferred income tax asset to be utilised. Unrecognised

deferred income tax assets are reassessed at each balance sheet date and are recognised to the extent that it has become probable

that future taxable profit will allow the deferred tax asset to be recovered.

Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are measured at the tax rates that are expected to apply to the year when the asset is realised

or the liability is settled, based on tax rates (and tax laws) that have been enacted or substantively enacted at the balance sheet date.

Income taxes relating to items recognised directly in equity are recognised in equity and not in profit or loss.

Deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities are offset only if a legally enforceable right exists to set off current tax assets against

current tax liabilities and the deferred tax assets and liabilities relate to the same taxable entity and the same taxation authority.

Other taxes

Revenues, expenses and assets are recognised net of the amount of GST, except when:

- The GST incurred on a purchase of goods and services is not recoverable from the taxation authority, in which case the GST

is recognised as part of the cost of acquisition of the asset or as part of the expense item as applicable.

- Receivables and payables, which are stated with the amount of GST included.

- The net amount of GST recoverable from or payable to the taxation authority is included as part of receivables or payables

in the balance sheet.

- Commitments and contingencies are disclosed net of the amount of GST recoverable from or payable to the taxation authority.

- The Group recognises uncertain tax positions as a liability where it is probable that an outflow of resources will be required.

NEW ZEALAND KING SALMON | ANNUAL REPORT FY18

72

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

n. Share-based payments
Certain employees of the Group receive remuneration in the form of share-based payments, whereby employees render services as

consideration for equity instruments (equity-settled transactions). The cost of equity-settled transactions is determined by the fair value

at the date when the grant is made using an appropriate valuation model, further details of which are given in Note 26.

That cost is recognised in employee benefits expense, together with a corresponding increase in equity (other capital reserves), over

the period in which the service and, where applicable, the performance conditions are fulfilled (the vesting period). The cumulative

expense recognised for equity-settled transactions at each reporting date until the vesting date reflects the extent to which the vesting

period has expired and the Group’s best estimate of the number of equity instruments that will ultimately vest. The expense or credit in

the statement of comprehensive income for the period represents the movement in cumulative expense recognised as at the beginning

and end of that period.

Service and non-market performance conditions are not taken into account when determining the grant date fair value of awards,

but the likelihood of the conditions being met is assessed as part of the Group’s best estimate of the number of equity instruments

that will ultimately vest. Market performance conditions are reflected within the grant date fair value. Any other conditions attached

to an award, but without an associated service requirement, are considered to be non-vesting conditions. Non-vesting conditions

are reflected in the fair value of an award and lead to an immediate expensing of an award unless there are also service and/or

performance conditions.

No expense is recognised for awards that do not ultimately vest because non-market performance and/or service conditions have

not been met. Where awards include a market or non-vesting condition, the transactions are treated as vested irrespective of whether

the market or non-vesting condition is satisfied, provided that all other performance and/or service conditions are satisfied.

When the terms of an equity-settled award are modified, the minimum expense recognised is the grant date fair value of the

unmodified award, provided the original terms of the award are met. An additional expense, measured as at the date of modification,

is recognised for any modification that increases the total fair value of the share-based payment transaction, or is otherwise beneficial

to the employee. Where an award is cancelled by the entity or by the counterparty, any remaining element of the fair value of the

award is expensed immediately through profit or loss.

4. NEW STANDARDS AND INTERPRETATIONS NOT YET ADOPTED

Various new standards, amendments to standards and interpretations are effective for annual periods beginning on or after

the current reporting period and have not been applied in preparing these consolidated financial statements. The following changes

may have a significant effect on the consolidated financial statements of the group:

NZ IFRS 9: Financial Instruments

NZ IFRS 9, ‘Financial Instruments’ replaces NZ IAS 39 ‘Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement’. The standard is effective

for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2018 and earlier application is permitted.

The new standard addresses the classification, measurement and de-recognition of financial assets and financial liabilities, introduces

new rules for hedge accounting and introduced a new impairment model.

The Group intends to adopt NZ IFRS 9 on its effective date and is currently assessing its full impact. The standard is not expected

to significantly impact the Group as the valuation and measurement of the Group’s financial assets and liabilities are not

expected to change.

NZ IFRS 15: Revenue from Contracts with Customers

NZ IFRS 15, ‘Revenue from Contracts with Customers’ establishes the framework for revenue recognition. The standard replaces

NZ IAS 18 ‘Revenue’ and NZ IAS 11 ‘Construction Contracts’ and related interpretations. The standard is effective for annual periods

beginning on or after 1 January 2018 and earlier application is permitted.

The new standard is based on the principle that revenue is recognised when control of a good or service transfers to a customer.

The notion of control replaces the existing notion of risks and rewards.

The Group intends to adopt NZ IFRS 15 on its effective date and is currently assessing its full impact. This standard is not expected to

significantly impact the Group as the majority of sales enable control to be transferred to customers within one to two days of dispatch.

NZ IFRS 16: Leases

NZ IFRS 16, ‘Leases’, replaces the current guidance in NZ IAS 17. Under NZ IFRS 16, a contract is, or contains, a lease if the contract

conveys the right to control the use of an identified asset for a period of time in exchange for consideration. Under NZ IAS 17,

a lessee was required to make a distinction between a finance lease (on balance sheet) and an operating lease (off balance sheet).

NZ IFRS 16 now requires a lessee to recognise a lease liability reflecting future lease payments and a ‘right-of-use asset’ for virtually

all lease contracts.

The standard is effective for accounting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2019. Early adoption is permitted but only in

conjunction with NZ IFRS 15, ‘Revenue from Contracts with Customers’.

The Group intends to adopt NZ IFRS 16 on its effective date and has yet to assess its full impact. The group currently leases a number

of offices, buildings, vehicles, water space and minor plant and equipment.

2018: BIG IDEAS START HERE

73

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

5. SEGMENT INFORMATION
Segment results

For management purposes, the Group is organised into three business units based on geographical sales market and customer

channel. The operating results of the business units are monitored for the purpose of making decisions about resource allocation

and performance assessment.

The Group’s reportable segments are:

New Zealand Retail

The company provides these customers with pre-packed value-added products (including wood roasted and cold smoked product),

whole fresh fish and pre-cut fillets.

New Zealand Foodservice

The company provides these customers with a broad variety of salmon products including whole fresh fish, pre-cut fillets, portions

and a range of smoked products.

Export

Predominantly customers based outside New Zealand most of whom currently fall into the foodservice category as described above.

Segment performance is evaluated at the EBITDA level and results are as follows:

New

Zealand

Retail

New

Zealand

Foodservice

Export

MarketTotal

$000$000$000$000

Year ended 30 June 2018

Revenue41,415 37,811 81,045 160,271

Segment EBITDA4,904 6,702 16,876 28,482

Year ended 30 June 2017

Revenue35,439 38,385 62,527 136,351

Segment EBITDA7,031 12,101 19,401 38,533

Depreciation, amortisation, finance income and costs, and fair value gains and losses on financial assets are not allocated

to individual segments as the underlying instruments are managed on a group basis.

Segment profit reconciles to profit before income tax as follows:

20182017

$000$000

Segment profit28,482 38,533

Depreciation, amortisation and impairment(5,105) (4,366)

Net finance costs(690) (1,802)

Group profit before tax22,687 32,365

The Group does not prepare information allocating assets and liabilities to the market facing segments as all material assets

and liabilities are managed on a group basis.

20182017

Revenue by geographical location of customers

$000$000

New Zealand79,226 73,824

North America48,435 35,956

Australia11,497 12,035

Japan8,265 6,034

Europe2,860 1,986

Other9,988 6,516

Total revenue160,271 136,351

Sales net of settlement discounts to two major customers for the year totalled $16,595k and $16,535k or 10.4% and 10.3%

respectively (2017 one major customer accounted for $16,511k or 12.1%). In both years, these customers were included in the

New Zealand Retail segment.

NEW ZEALAND KING SALMON | ANNUAL REPORT FY18

74

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

6. OTHER INCOME
20182017

Other income

$000$000

Grants received 148 112

Supplier settlement- 1,784

Rebate on supply1,135 -

Insurance settlements188 214

Supplier forgiveness of debt- 348

Contract penalties (received)175 -

Profit on sale of property, plant and equipment19 28

Other income157 88

Total other income1,822 2,574

7. EXPENSES

20182017

Corporate and other expenses include:$000$000

Trade receivables written off10 1

Impairment of trade receivables20 84

Professional fees related to capital raising- 1,970

Research cost660 849

Water space process expense171 846

Loss on Assets Held for Sale113 180

Minimum lease payments - operating leases1,477 1,118

Directors' fees420 320

Other directors' expenses43 18

Donations17 43

20182017

Employee benefits expense$000$000

Wages and salaries29,616 26,445

Defined contribution plan expenses683 569

Restructuring costs40 (4)

Other employee benefits expenses3,933 3,476

Outsourced labour1,399 555

Total employee benefits expense35,671 31,041

8. FINANCE INCOME AND COSTS

20182017

Finance income$000$000

Interest income198 188

Total finance income198 188

20182017

Finance costs$000$000

Bank facility fees293 284

Interest on bank loans and overdrafts595 1,210

Interest on shareholder loans- 496

Total finance costs888 1,990

2018: BIG IDEAS START HERE

75

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

9. INCOME TAX
20182017

Recognised in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income$000$000

Current income tax expense6,143 4,745

Under provision - previous year127 (49)

Deferred tax relating to origination and reversal of temporary differences292 4,905

Total income tax expense/(credit) in the statement of comprehensive income6,562 9,601

Tax amounts posted directly to equity(721) 1,700

Reconciliation of tax expense to statutory income tax rate

Profit /(loss) before tax22,687 32,365

Income tax using the company tax rate 28%6,352 9,063

Non deductible/non assessable items73 617

Under provision - previous year127 (49)

Prior period adjustment(30) -

Other differences40 (30)

Total tax expense6,562 9,601

Statement of financial position deferred tax assets and liabilities20182017

Deferred tax liabilities $000$000

Accelerated depreciation for tax purposes (2,807) (2,853)

Fair value adjustment to biological assets(10,300) (9,640)

Gains on foreign currency hedges(426) (1,108)

Increase accounting cost for finished goods(462) (409)

Total deferred tax liabilities(13,995) (14,010)

Deferred tax assets

Provision for doubtful trade debtors23 43

Provision for employee benefits793 570

Impairment of non-current assets- 176

Share based payments113 40

Losses on foreign currency hedges299 258

Other provisions824 549

Total deferred tax assets2,052 1,636

Net deferred tax liability(11,943) (12,374)

Statement of comprehensive income deferred tax assets and liabilities20182017

Deferred tax liabilities $000$000

Accelerated depreciation for tax purposes (42) 129

Fair value adjustment to biological assets661 4,991

Increase accounting cost for finished goods53 38

Total deferred tax liabilities672 5,158

Deferred tax assets

Provision for doubtful trade debtors20 (26)

Provision for employee benefits(222) (24)

Impairment of non-current assets176 114

Share based payments(74) (40)

Other provisions(280) (277)

Total deferred tax assets(380) (253)

Deferred tax (credit)/expense292 4,905

Imputation credit account

The imputation credit account balance in the New Zealand King Salmon Company Limited as at 30 June 2018 is $3,504k (2017: $1,821k).

NEW ZEALAND KING SALMON | ANNUAL REPORT FY18

76

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

10. COMPONENTS OF OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
20182017

Movement in reserves$000$000

Forward currency contracts

Reclassification during the year to profit or loss12 (18)

Income tax effect(2) 5

Realised/unrealised net gain/(loss) during the year (2,436) 4,997

Income tax effect682 (1,400)

Interest rate swaps

Realised/unrealised net gain/(loss) during the year (147) 1,084

Income tax effect41 (305)

Currency translation differences

Currency translation differences120 12

Share based payment expenses

Share based payment expense263 142

Net movement in reserves(1,467) 4,517

11. EARNINGS PER SHARE

Basic earnings per share amounts are calculated by dividing the profit for the year attributable to shareholders of the Company

by the weighted average number of ordinary shares on issue during the year. Diluted earnings per share assume conversion of all

potential ordinary shares in determining the weighted average number of ordinary shares on issue.

20182017

Earnings per share$000$000

Profit attributable to ordinary equity holders 16,125 22,764

# of Shares# of Shares

000000

Weighted average number of ordinary shares for diluted earnings per share138,475138,158

Basic earnings per share$0.12$0.16

Diluted earnings per share$0.12$0.16

12. CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

20182017

Cash and cash equivalents$000$000

Cash at bank and on hand14,021 10,175

Short-term deposits407 472

Total cash and cash equivalents14,428 10,647

2018: BIG IDEAS START HERE

77

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

13. TRADE AND OTHER RECEIVABLES
20182017

Trade and other receivables$000$000

Trade receivables11,016 10,848

Allowance for impairment loss(110) (153)

Prepayments1,103 970

Other receivables417 23

Total trade and other receivables12,426 11,688

Trade receivables generally have 20-30 day terms and are recognised at their realisable value. Collectability of trade receivables

is reviewed on an ongoing basis. Debts that are known to be uncollectable are written off when identified. Impairment losses are

recognised net of insurance proceeds when there is objective evidence that the Group will not be able to collect the debt.

20182017

Ageing analysis of trade receivables$000$000

> 90 days overdue112 90

31 - 90 days overdue141 68

15 - 30 days overdue784 49

< 15 days overdue356 1,867

Not yet due9,623 8,774

Total receivables11,016 10,848

20182017

Receivables impairment movement$000$000

As at 1 July153 69

Additional provisions for impairment130 151

Receivables written off during the year(10) 1

Reversal of unused amounts(163) (68)

As at 30 June110 153

14. INVENTORIES

20182017

Inventories$000$000

Raw materials9,822 9,525

Work in progress106 -

Finished goods6,654 7,149

Total inventories16,582 16,674

The closing cost of finished goods as at 30 June 2018 includes a fair value uplift at point of harvest of $2,354k (2017: $2,391k)

and an impairment provision of $1,638k (2017: $1,446k).

20182017

Amount of inventories recognised as an expense in the statement of comprehensive income$000$000

Cost of inventories recognised as an expense145,093 119,627

Movement in net realisable value of inventory decrease227 252

Total cost of goods sold145,320 119,879

The cost of inventories recognised as an expense for the year ended 30 June 2018 includes a fair value uplift at point of harvest

of $47,988k (2017: $37,135k).

NEW ZEALAND KING SALMON | ANNUAL REPORT FY18

78

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

15. BIOLOGICAL ASSETS
The Group has three hatcheries in the South Island and eight operational marine salmon farms in the Marlborough Sounds.

The fish livestock typically grow for up to 31 months before harvest.

Cost Fair Value GainTotal

Biological assets$000$000$000

As at 1 July 201745,087 34,429 79,516

Increase due to biological transformation

1

67,846 36,692 104,538

Decrease due to harvest

2

(57,768) (47,951) (105,719)

Decrease due to mortality

3

(12,498) - (12,498)

Changes in fair value

4

- 13,617 13,617

As at 30 June 201842,667 36,787 79,454

1

Biological transformation fair value is impacted by volume increases and fish weight at reporting date relative to the target

fish harvest weight of 4 kgs (proportional recognition).

2

Harvested fair value is included in cost of goods sold in the statement of comprehensive income and is calculated by multiplying

the current years harvest (biomass) by the prior years estimated gross margin per kg (recognised at 100%).

3

Mortality cost is expensed directly to the statement of comprehensive income in the period which it occurs and is not subject

to a fair value uplift.

4

Changes in fair value are impacted by movements in margin primarily being changes in sales price and costs to sell

(fish cost, harvest, processing and freight to market).

Cost Fair Value GainTotal

Biological assets$000$000$000

As at 1 July 201636,347 16,603 52,950

Increase due to biological transformation70,330 50,606 120,936

Decrease due to harvest(56,346) (37,019) (93,365)

Decrease due to mortality(5,244) - (5,244)

Changes in fair value- 4,239 4,239

As at 30 June 201745,087 34,429 79,516

20182017

Fair value gain/(loss) recognised in profit and loss$000$000

Gain arising from growth of biological assets36,692 50,606

Movement in fair value of biological assets13,617 4,239

Total fair value gain on biological transformation50,309 54,845

20182017

Harvested biomassmtmt

Harvested live weight biomass9,112 8,218

Total live weight harvested for the period (metric tonne)9,112 8,218

20182017

Estimated closing biomassmtmt

Closing fresh water stocks105 142

Closing sea water stocks5,286 6,085

Total estimated closing biomass live weight as at period end5,391 6,227

Fair value measurement

Measurement of fair value is performed using a fair value model. The method of valuation therefore falls into level 3 of the fair value

hierarchy as the inputs are unobservable inputs.

The valuation of biological assets is carried out separately for each site at a brood and strategy level. Estimated actual cost up

to the date of harvest per site is used to measure the expected margin at the time the fish is defined as ready for harvest, being

4.0kg live weight. Selling price is estimated at balance date based on the most relevant future market price at expected harvest date.

The expected gross margin is recognised proportionately based on average biomass at reporting date. Fair value measurement

commences at the date of transfer to sea water as this is considered the point at which the fish commence their grow out cycle.

2018: BIG IDEAS START HERE

79

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Fair value risk and sensitivity
The Group is exposed to financial risks relating to the production of salmon stocks including climatic events, disease and contamination

of water space.

The Group seeks to produce and market the highest quality salmon products. Extensive monitoring and benchmarking is carried out

to provide optimum conditions and diets to maximise fish performance during the grow out cycle. Sales are maintained in a range

of brands, products and markets to maximise returns from the quality mix of fish harvested. The Group has insurance to cover some

of the risks relating to the livestock.

The estimate of unrealised fair value gain from cost is based on several assumptions. Changes in these assumptions will impact the fair

value calculation. The realised profit which is achieved on the sale of inventory will differ from the calculations of fair value of biological

assets because of changes in key factors such as the final market destinations of inventory sold, changes in price, foreign exchange rates,

harvest weight, growth rates, mortality, cost levels and differences in harvested fish quality.

Leaving all other variables constant a 10.0% increase/decrease in average future sales prices would increase/decrease the fair value of

biological assets on hand and profit before tax by $10.8m (2017: 5% increase/decrease $5.4m) (excludes the impact of finished goods),

while a 10.0% increase/decrease in future harvest volume would increase/decrease the fair value of biological assets on hand and profit

before tax by $3.6m (2017: 5% increase/decrease $1.7m).

A 10% increase/decrease in costs to sell would decrease/increase the fair value of biological assets on hand and profit before tax by

$7.0m (2017: 5% increase/decrease $3.5m). Changes in fish health and environmental factors may affect the quality of harvested fish,

which may be reflected in realised profit via both achieved sales price and production costs.

16. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

Freehold

land and

buildings

Plant,

equipment

and fittings

Vehicles and

sea vessels

Construction

in progressTotal

Cost$000$000$000$000$000

As at 1 July 20179,029 50,919 2,385 1,085 63,418

Additions715 4,744 137 7,573 13,169

Disposals(49) (4,456) (157) (5,724) (10,386)

As at 30 June 20179,695 51,207 2,365 2,934 66,201

Additions301 10,427 334 12,009 23,071

Disposals- (116) (97) (10,209) (10,422)

As at 30 June 20189,996 61,518 2,602 4,734 78,850

Depreciation and impairment

As at 1 July 20171,442 27,685 1,694 - 30,821

Depreciation250 3,748 125 - 4,123

Impairment- - - - -

Disposals(33) (4,285) (151) - (4,469)

As at 30 June 20171,659 27,148 1,668 - 30,475

Depreciation281 4,437 145 - 4,863

Impairment- - - - -

Disposals- (113) (97) - (210)

As at 30 June 20181,940 31,472 1,716 - 35,128

Net Book Value

As at 30 June 20178,036 24,059 697 2,934 35,726

As at 30 June 20188,056 30,046 886 4,734 43,722

Borrowing costs

There were no borrowing costs capitalised in 2018 (2017: $nil).

Impairment

There were no impairment losses recognised in 2018 (2017: $nil).

Finance Leases

The carrying value of property, plant and equipment held under finance leases as at 30 June 2018 was $310k (2017: $353k).

There were no additions of property, plant and equipment under finance leases in the 2018 year, $nil (2017: $136k). Leased assets

are pledged as security for the related finance lease liabilities.

NEW ZEALAND KING SALMON | ANNUAL REPORT FY18

80

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

17. INTANGIBLES
Development

in progressTrademarks

Farm and

hatchery

licensesSoftwareGoodwillTotal

Cost$000$000$000$000$000$000

As at 1 July 20163 242 4,322 3,927 39,255 47, 749

Additions457 - 57 11 - 525

Disposals(452) - - (1,817) - (2,269)

Transferred to assets held for sale- - - - - -

As at 30 June 20178 242 4,379 2,121 39,255 46,005

Additions1,363 - 6 524 - 1,893

Disposals(541) - - - - (541)

Transferred from assets held for sale- - 308 - - 308

As at 30 June 2018830 242 4,693 2,645 39,255 47,665

Depreciation and impairment

As at 1 July 2016- 200 680 3,743 - 4,623

Amortisation- - 131 112 - 243

Disposals- - - (1,812) - (1,812)

Impairment- - - - - -

As at 30 June 2017- 200 811 2,043 - 3,054

Amortisation- - 141 101 - 242

Disposals- - - - - -

Impairment- - - - - -

As at 30 June 2018- 200 952 2,144 - 3,296

Net Book Value

As at 30 June 20178 42 3,568 78 39,255 42,951

As at 30 June 2018830 42 3,741 501 39,255 44,369

Goodwill

Goodwill resulted from the acquisition of The New Zealand King Salmon Co. Limited and is subject to annual impairment testing.

The Group performs an annual impairment test in June each year. The Group considers the relationship between its market capitalisation

and its book value, among other indicators, when reviewing for indicators of impairment.

The goodwill is notionally allocated to the New Zealand King Salmon Company’s operating segments as cash generating units.

The recoverable amounts of the cash generating units have been determined based on a value in use calculation using future estimated

cash flows, capital expenditure and changes in working capital over a five year period, plus an estimated terminal value. The forecasts

were based on actual results and expected future use of water space licences currently held, before fair value adjustments to biological

assets. The growth rate used to estimate the cash flows of the unit beyond the five-year period is 1.7% p.a. (2017: 3.3% p.a.). A discount

rate of 10.36% p.a. (2017: 11.1% p.a.) has been applied to discount future estimated cash flows to their present value. The net present

value of these future estimated cash flows exceeds the carrying amount of goodwill therefore the Company has concluded that there

is no impairment to the goodwill.

The calculation of value in use is most sensitive to changes in sales prices, exchange rates, sales volumes and fish performance.

Reasonably probable changes in the assumptions used would not cause the carrying value of goodwill to exceed the recoverable

amount for any of the cash generating units.

Trade marks

Trademarks are externally acquired and are carried at cost less impairment. They have indefinite useful lives and are assessed

annually for impairment. No impairment has been recognised during the period (2017: Nil).

18. NON-CURRENT ASSETS HELD FOR SALE

The Marlborough Salmon Farm Relocations Advisory Panel report (made publicly available in February 2018) did not recommend the

relocation of New Zealand King Salmon Crail Bay sites which were previously classified as Marine Licence Held for Sale. This has resulted

in the reintroduction of these licences to intangibles. In accordance with NZ IFRS 5 this has been at the amortised value that would have

been recognised if the asset had not been held for sale, $308K (FY17: $421K). The difference has been recognised as an Expense in the

Statement of Comprehensive Income.

2018: BIG IDEAS START HERE

81

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

19. INTEREST BEARING LOANS AND BORROWINGS
20182017

Current interest bearing loans and borrowings$000$000

Finance lease liabilities133 144

Secured bank loans- -

Other borrowings328 270

Total current interest bearing loans and borrowings461 414

Non-current interest bearing loans and borrowings

Finance lease liabilities- 124

Secured bank loans10,000 10,000

Other borrowings- -

Total non-current interest bearing loans and borrowings10,000 10,124

The Company has facilities with BNZ for $30m, secured by a general security deed over the assets of the Group. The expiry date of

facility A of $18m is 25 November 2020, and facility B of $12m expires on 18 October 2019. At balance date $10m of facility A was drawn

(June 2017: $10m).

20. TRADE AND OTHER PAYABLES

20182017

Trade and other payables$000$000

Trade payables11,170 11,318

Other payables2,754 1,964

Total trade and other payables13,924 13,282

21. EMPLOYEE BENEFITS

20182017

Current employee benefits$000$000

Bonuses1,193 903

Employee annual and sick leave benefits 2,022 1,956

Long service leave169 169

Total current employee benefits3,384 3,028

Non-current employee benefits

Long service leave473 451

Total non-current employee benefits473 451

Long service leave

Long service leave provisions are calculated based on the expected future payments to employees, discounted to their net present value.

NEW ZEALAND KING SALMON | ANNUAL REPORT FY18

82

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

22. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Operating leases

The Group has entered into various operating lease arrangements with providers of premises, vehicles, water space and equipment.

Many of these arrangements are for specified terms with rights of renewal on expiry of the terms. The commitments under

non-cancellable operating leases take into account the renewal periods existing at balance date and are as follows:

20182017

Operating lease commitments as a lessee$000$000

Less than one year568 607

Between one and five years1,052 948

More than five years- 722

Total operating lease commitments as a lessee1,620 2,277

Finance leases

The Group has finance leases for various items of plant and machinery. The Group’s obligations under finance leases are secured

by the lessor’s title to the leased assets. Future minimum lease payments under finance leases, together with the present value of

the net minimum lease payments are as follows:

Minimum lease

payments

Present value

of payments

Finance lease commitments as at 30 June 2018$000$000

Less than one year133 133

Between one and five years- -

Total finance lease commitments as at 30 June 2018133 133

Finance lease commitments as at 30 June 2017

Less than one year143 125

Between one and five years124 108

Total finance lease commitments as at 30 June 2017267 233

Capital commitments

The Group has entered into agreements to purchase plant and equipment. As at 30 June 2018 the total commitment is $1,547k

(2017: $1,137k).

Contingencies

The Group has a contingent liability of $1,066k in respect of a fish transport contract requiring the Group to purchase three bulk

tankers (including modifications made in 2018), should the fish transport contract be terminated early. (2017: $995k).

Guarantees

The group has three guarantee facilities totalling $115k.

23. FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT

The Group’s activities expose it to a variety of financial risks: market risk, credit risk and liquidity risk. The Group uses derivative financial

instruments to hedge certain risk exposures. Financial risk management is the responsibility of the Chief Financial Officer in accordance

with the Treasury Policy approved by the Board of Directors. In addition, the Group has a Treasury Committee, a sub-committee of the

Board that oversees financial risk management.

Market risk

Market risk is the risk that the fair value of future cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate because of changes in market prices.

This comprises of two key types of risks; currency and interest rate risk.

Currency risk

The Group has exposure to foreign exchange risk as a result of transactions denominated in foreign currency, arising primarily from

normal trading activities, but also from the net investment in the foreign subsidiary.

The Group manages its foreign currency risk by hedging its future exposure in respect of its import purchases and its export sales,

over a maximum of five years, when exposures are considered highly probable. The Group hedges this exposure with the use of forward

foreign exchange contracts and options. The notional contract amounts of forward foreign exchange contracts and options outstanding

at balance date were $47.5m on the import side (2017: $57.6m) and $126.2m on the export side (2017: $79.3m), for delivery over the next

five financial years, in line with anticipated payment dates.

The Group imports feed from Chile and Australia, purchases of which are in US and Australian dollars respectively. In order to protect

against exchange rate movements and to manage the inventory costing process, the Group has entered into forward exchange

contracts to purchase Australian, United States dollars and Japanese yen.

2018: BIG IDEAS START HERE

83

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The Group exports salmon to many countries, the major ones being Australia, Japan and the United States. Sales are denominated
in Australian dollars, Japanese yen and US dollars respectively. The Group has entered into forward exchange contracts to sell yen and

US dollars.

The cash flows are expected to occur up to 60 months from 1 July 2018. The profit and loss within cost of sales will be affected

as sales are made.

The Group tests each of the designated cash flow hedges for effectiveness on a monthly basis both retrospectively and prospectively

using the ratio offset method. If the testing falls within the 80%:125% range, the hedge is considered highly effective and continues

to be designated as a cash flow hedge. At balance date all foreign currency hedges were determined to be highly effective.

The NZ dollar equivalent of unhedged currency risk on assets at balance date is $113k (2017: $220k) whilst the NZ dollar equivalent

of unhedged currency risk on liabilities at balance date is $31k (2017: $86k).

Currency sensitivity

The following table demonstrates the sensitivity to a reasonably possible change in the value of the New Zealand Dollar against the key

currencies to which the Group is exposed. The impact on the Group’s pre-tax profit is the result of a change in fair value of monetary

assets and liabilities. The impact on the Group’s equity is due to changes in the fair value of forward exchange contracts and options

designated as cash flow hedges.

EquityProfit

As at 30 June 2018$000$000

Impact of a 5% strengthening of the NZD2,027 (264)

Impact of a 5% weakening of the NZD(2,199) 292

Impact of a 10% strengthening of the NZD3,924 (505)

Impact of a 10% weakening of the NZD(4,653) 617

As at 30 June 2017

Impact of a 5% strengthening of the NZD94 (32)

Impact of a 5% weakening of the NZD(151) 29

Impact of a 10% strengthening of the NZD150 (68)

Impact of a 10% weakening of the NZD(346) 56

Interest rate risk

The Group has exposure to interest rate risk that arises mainly due to the Group’s long-term debt obligations with floating interest

rates. Interest earned on call deposits are based on the current interest rate. Interest rate swaps are used to manage interest rate risk,

current swap cover out to 2024. The amount of Parent borrowing covered using swaps at balance date was $10m (2017: $10m).

The Group manages its interest rate risk by hedging its future exposure with interest swaps, fixing a minimum of 50% of a rolling

12 month projected debt balance. Longer dated periods may be covered with forward starting swaps out to a maximum of 10 years.

Interest rate swaps in place at balance date cover 100% (2017: 100%) of the principal outstanding and are timed to expire in the next

three to forty-two months. Forward starting swaps have been used to further extend maturities out to 2024 ($10m). The fixed interest

rates for the existing swaps range between 4.3% and 5.01% (2017: 3.4% and 4.75%) and the floating rate of 2.03% is aligned to the

floating quarterly bank bill rate. The loss on interest rate swaps at balance date was $1,142k (2017: $986k loss), which has been taken

to reserves.

Interest rate sensitivity

The following table demonstrates the sensitivity of the fair value of the interest rate swaps to a reasonably possible change

in interest rates:

20182017

$000$000

Impact of an increase of 50 basis points287 319

Impact of a decrease of 50 basis points(298) (334)

NEW ZEALAND KING SALMON ff ANNUAL REPORT FY18

84

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Credit risk
Credit risk is the risk of financial loss that arises if a counterparty to a financial instrument does not meet its contractual obligations.

Financial instruments which potentially subject the Group to credit risk principally consist of bank balances, trade receivables, derivative

financial instruments and financial guarantees.

Financial instruments are only entered into with banks that have in place an executed International Swaps and Derivatives Association

(ISDA) Master Agreement with the Group.

Maximum exposures to credit risk as at balance date are:

20182017

$000$000

Cash and short term deposits14,428 10,647

Trade and other receivables12,426 11,688

Derivative financial assets /(liabilities)88 45

The above maximum exposures are net of any recognised provision for losses. No collateral is held on the above amounts.

Concentrations of credit risk

Bank balances are maintained with several banks but mainly with Bank of New Zealand. There is a wide spread of debtors, in terms

of size and geographical location within New Zealand and overseas. Concentration of credit risk in trade receivables is not considered

significant as the Group’s customers operate in different market channels and geographic areas.

Liquidity risk

The Group performs cash flow forecasting activities on a daily basis to ensure it has sufficient cash to meet operational needs and

monitors performance against bank covenants on a monthly basis. Surplus cash is invested in short-term or money market deposits.

Undrawn committed facilities and/or liquid assets are maintained at all times at an amount sufficient to cover the forecast cash

payments to employees, suppliers, tax authorities and banking institutions as they fall due.

The following table analyses the contractual and expected cash flows for all financial liabilities:

Less than

one year

Between

one and

two years

Between

two and

five years

As at 30 June 2018$000$000$000

Bank loans(4,580) 431 1,392

Finance lease liabilities143 - -

Trade and other payables13,924 - -

Financial guarantee contracts115 - -

Total non-derivative liabilities9,602 431 1,392

Forward foreign currency exchange contracts42,518 47,088 25,788

Forward foreign currency options21,931 17,639 15,771

Interest swaps616 804 2,620

Total derivative liabilities65,065 65,531 44,179

As at 30 June 2017

Bank loans330 371 1,351

Finance lease liabilities144 80 44

Trade and other payables13,282 - -

Financial guarantee contracts315 315 315

Total non-derivative liabilities14,071 766 1,710

Forward foreign currency exchange contracts46,198 34,221 21,171

Forward foreign currency options5,495 6,620 4,963

Interest swaps252 245 603

Total derivative liabilities51,945 41,086 26,737

2018: BIG IDEAS START HERE

85

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

24. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The carrying value of cash and short term deposits, trade receivables, trade payables and other current liabilities is considered

a reasonable approximation to their fair value due to the short term maturities of these instruments.

The carrying value of the BNZ loan drawing of $10m is considered a reasonable approximation of its fair value due to the short term

maturities of the drawings. New Zealand King Salmon Investments has the discretion to roll these short term drawings out to 2020.

The following financial instruments of the Group are carried at fair value:

20182017

Current derivative financial assets$000$000

Forward exchange contracts662 1,776

Foreign exchange options395 290

Total Current derivative financial assets1,057 2,066

Non-current derivative financial assets

Forward exchange contracts892 1,882

Foreign exchange options992 1,314

Total Non-current derivative financial assets1,884 3,196

Current derivative financial liabilities

Forward exchange contracts213 519

Foreign exchange options150 24

Interest rate swaps826 734

Total Current derivative financial liabilities1,189 1,277

Non-current derivative financial liabilities

Forward exchange contracts425 451

Foreign exchange options630 307

Interest rate swaps244 190

Total non-current derivative financial liabilities1,299 948

The carrying value of obligations under financial leases differs from fair value as follows:

As at 30 June 2018As at 30 June 2017

Carrying

amount

Fair

value

Carrying

amount

Fair

value

$000$000$000$000

Obligations under finance leases133 133 267 233

Total obligations under finance leases133 133 267 233

Valuation methods

Financial instruments have been categorised into the following hierarchy and valued according to the following definitions,

based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement as a whole:

Level 1: Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the entity can access at the measurement date

Level 2: Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability either directly

(i.e. as prices) or indirectly (i.e. derived from prices)

Level 3: Inputs for the assets or liabilities that are not based on observable market data (unobservable inputs)

All derivative financial instruments for which a fair value is recognised have been categorised within level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

Industry experts have provided the fair values for all derivatives based on an industry standard model.

25. CAPITAL MANAGEMENT

Group capital

The capital of the Group consists of share capital, reserves and retained earnings. The Group’s objectives when managing capital are

to safeguard the Group’s ability to continue as a going concern in order to provide returns for shareholders, benefits for shareholders

and to maintain an optimal capital structure to reduce the cost of capital.

In addition to this, the Group aims to ensure that it meets financial covenants attached to the interest bearing loans and borrowings

that define capital structure requirements. There have been no breaches in the financial covenants of any interest-bearing loans and

borrowings in the current period.

In order to maintain or adjust the capital structure the Group may adjust dividends paid to shareholders, return capital to shareholders,

issue new shares or sell assets to reduce debt.

NEW ZEALAND KING SALMON | ANNUAL REPORT FY18

86

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

26. CAPITAL AND RESERVES
Share capital20182017

Issued shares000000

Ordinary shares138,475 138,158

Total issued shares138,475 138,158

Ordinary shares are fully paid with no par value. Each ordinary share has an equal right to vote, to participate in dividends, and to share

in any surplus on winding up of the Company. Dividends paid during the year consisted of a fully imputed dividend of $0.02 per share and

a $0.01 per share special dividend both paid on 6 September 2017. Additionally, a fully imputed interim dividend of $0.02 per share was

paid on 14 March 2018 (2017: $0.02 paid on 24 March).

# of SharesShare Capital

2018201720182017

Movement in ordinary share capital000000$000$000

As at 1 July138,158 25,295 122,518 25,296

Shareholder loans converted to share capital- 26,941 - 70,202

Shares issued by way of 2.11 to 1 share split- 57,955 - -

Issue of new shares pursuant to IPO- 26,786 - 30,000

Transactional costs arising on share issue- - - (1,797)

Employee offer pursuant to IPO LTI share ownership plan- 1,181 - 1,322

Share issue for employee LTI share scheme317 - - (2,505)

Share issue recognised on repayment of employee loans- - 61 -

Total share capital as at 30 June138,475 138,158 122,579 122,518

Reserves

Foreign currency translation reserve

The foreign currency translation reserve is used to record exchange difference arising from the translation of the financial statements

of the foreign subsidiary.

Hedge reserve

The hedge reserve represents the unrealised gains and losses on interest rate swaps and foreign currency forward contracts that the

Group has taken out in order to mitigate interest rate and foreign currency risks, net of deferred tax.

Share-based payment reserve

The share-based payment reserve relates to two long term incentive (LTI) schemes and and two employee share ownership scheme.

All of these schemes involve the Company making interest-free limited recourse loans to selected personnel to acquire shares in the

Company. The employees must remain in employment for the duration of the vesting or escrow periods before the employees receive

the full benefit of share ownership.

The senior leadership share ownership plan LTI scheme was established prior to the IPO and relates to 3,176,878 shares in the Company.

The ordinary shares in the Company are security for the interest-free limited recourse loans and are held in escrow until after the

financial results have been announced for the year ending 30 June 2018.

The senior executive LTI scheme was established at the time of the IPO and relates to 993,671 shares in the Company. The ordinary

shares in the Company are security for the interest-free limited recourse loans, are held by a Custodian and will vest three years from

the granting date of 19 October 2016. The price to be paid for each share is the issue price at grant date, reduced by any dividends that

are applied to the interest-free limited recourse loans. No shares vested, expired during the year, however 202,714 shares were forfeited

during the year.

A further 317,515 shares were issued on 29 September 2017 with vesting date being 1 September 2020. These shares are also held by

a Custodian with the ordinary shares in the Company being security for the interest free limited recourse loan. The price to be paid

for each share is the issue price at grant date, reduced by any dividends that are applied to the interest free limited recourse loan.

No shares vested or expired during the year however 13,024 shares were forfeited during the year.

The employee share ownership scheme was established at the time of the IPO and relates to 187,076 shares in the Company and was

established at the time of the IPO. The ordinary shares in the Company are security for the interest-free limited recourse loans which

may remain in place whilst the holder is in employment with the Company.

The estimated value of share options was determined using the Black-Scholes pricing calculator and is being amortised over the

respective restrictive periods. The option cost is treated as an employee expense with the corresponding credit included in the share

based payment reserve. The inputs into the option pricing valuation model are the acquisition or granting date, initial issue at the time

of the IPO in October 2016, share price of $1.12, and $1.22 for further shares issued in September 2017 or $1.77 for those who joined the

scheme in September 2017 (which accordingly is the option exercise price), expected share price volatility of 14.1%, option life relative

to each respective vesting or escrow period and a risk free interest rate of 2.1%. During the year 215,738 forfeited LTI shares were held

by the Company as treasury stock, and may be issued to nominated executives in future grants of LTI shares.

Retained earnings

Retained earnings represents the profits retained in the business.

2018: BIG IDEAS START HERE

87

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

27. EVENTS AFTER BALANCE DATE
20182017

Dividends declared after balance date:$000$000

Final cash dividend4,152 2,763

Special dividend- 1,382

4,152 4,145

A final fully imputed dividend of 3 cents per share on ordinary shares was approved on 28 August 2018 for payment on

21 September 2018. These dividends are not recognised as a liability as at 30 June 2018.

28. RELATED PARTY DISCLOSURES

Subsidiaries

New Zealand King Salmon Investments Limited has the following trading subsidiaries.

SubsidiaryCompany of IncorporationEquity Interest

The New Zealand King Salmon Co LimitedNew Zealand100%

New Zealand King Salmon Exports LimitedNew Zealand100%

The New Zealand King Salmon Pty LimitedAustralia100%

New Zealand King Salmon USA IncorporatedUnited States of America100%

The principal activity of The New Zealand King Salmon Co Ltd is the farming and processing of salmon. The activity of New Zealand King

Salmon Exports Ltd, The New Zealand King Salmon Pty Ltd, and New Zealand King Salmon USA Inc is the distribution of salmon.

At balance date Oregon Group Limited owned 40.16% (30 June 2017: 40.26%) and China Resources Ng Fung Limited owned 9.96%

(30 June 2017: 9.97%) of the shares in New Zealand King Salmon Investments Limited.

Transactions with related parties

Sales to and purchases from related parties are made in arm’s length transactions both at normal market prices and on normal

commercial terms. The following provides the total amount of transactions that were entered into with related parties for the

relevant financial year:

20182017

Related party payments$000$000

Interest paid - Oregon Group Limited- 272

Interest paid - Other shareholders- 194

Good and services purchased from other related parties63 258

Total related party payments63 724

Related party sales

Goods and services sold to related parties(1,527) (462)

Total related party sales(1,527) (462)

Sales to and purchases from related parties are made in arm’s length transactions, both at normal market prices and

on normal commercial terms.

Amounts owing to related parties20182017

Current amounts owing to related parties$000$000

Other amounts owing to related parties46 18

Total current amounts owing to related parties46 18

NEW ZEALAND KING SALMON | ANNUAL REPORT FY18

88

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

20182017
Amounts owing by related parties$000$000

Amounts owing by related parties177 94

Total amounts owing by related parties177 94

Compensation of key management personnel of the Group20182017

Key management personnel compensation$000$000

Short-term employee benefits1,947 2,159

Share based payment expense161 112

Post employment pension and medical benefits86 108

Total key management personnel compensation2,194 2,379

29. AUDITOR’S REMUNERATION

20182017

Auditor’s remuneration$000$000

Audit fees112 95

Other assurance33 45

Tax compliance and consultancy67 88

Transaction advisory services- 175

Total auditor’s remuneration212 403

Other assurance services include review of the interim financial statements and performance of agreed upon procedures on

sustainability information of the Group. The prior year also included transaction advisory services relating to work performed

as investigative accountants in connection with the pubilic offer of shares in the Company.

30. RECONCILIATION OF NET OPERATING CASH FLOW TO PROFIT/(LOSS)

20182017

Reconciliation of the profit for the year with the net cash from operating activities$000$000

Profit before tax22,687 32,365

Adjusted for

Depreciation and amortisation5,105 4,366

(Gain)/loss on sale of assets94 (29)

Loss on Asset Held for Sale2 182

Share-based payments263 142

Net foreign exchange differences367 (70)

Capitalised interest on shareholder loans- 389

Movement in prepaid insurances and other loans(461) (112)

Income tax expense(6,562) (9,601)

(Increase) in deferred tax on reserves721 (1,700)

(Increase)/decrease in trade and other receivables and prepayments(738) (1,458)

(Increase)/decrease in inventories and biological assets154 (25,948)

Increase/(decrease) in trade and other payables1,020 (1,503)

Increase/(decrease) in tax liabilities2,186 8,307

Net cash flow from operating activities24,838 5,330

2018: BIG IDEAS START HERE

89

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

31. COMPARISON TO PROSPECTIVE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
ActualProspective

20182018

$000$000

a. Revenue

160,271 143,610

Cost of goods sold(145,320) (122,771)

Fair value gain on biological transformation50,309 37,589

Freight costs to market(15,212) (13,610)

Gross profit50,048 44,818

Other operating income1,822 -

Sales, marketing and advertising expenses(10,381) (9,600)

Distribution overheads(3,348) (2,041)

Corporate Expenses(6,728) (7,081)

Other expenses(2,931) -

Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation28,482 26,096

Depreciation and amortisation(5,105) (5,928)

Finance income198 312

Finance expenses(888) (790)

Profit before tax22,687 19,690

Income tax expense(6,562) (5,541)

Net profit after tax16,125 14,149

Explanation of variances

The fair value gain on biological transformation is higher than the prospective financial information (PFI) due to increases in sales

price and average weight at harvest (see note 15). Gross profit is also higher than PFI due to higher sales volumes and price increases.

Other operating income primarily relates to a supplier feed rebate included under cost of goods sold in PFI.

NEW ZEALAND KING SALMON | ANNUAL REPORT FY18

90

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

b. Prospective statement of financial position
ActualProspective

ASSETS20182018

Current assets$000$000

Cash and cash equivalents14,428 647

Trade and other receivables12,426 12,499

Inventories16,582 19,575

Biological assets71,566 64,974

Assets held for sale- 421

Other financial assets- 1,475

Derivative financial assets1,057 96

Total current assets116,059 99,687

Non-current assets

Property, plant and equipment43,722 44,449

Biological assets7,888 11,162

Derivative financial assets1,884 -

Deferred tax asset2,052 1,343

Intangible assets5,114 2,954

Goodwill39,255 39,255

Total non-current assets99,915 99,163

TOTAL ASSETS215,974 198,850

LIABILITIES

Current liabilities

Trade and other payables13,924 20,460

Employee benefits3,384 2,433

Borrowings461 178

Other financial liabilities46 -

Derivative financial liabilities1,189 992

Taxation payable4,902 580

Total current liabilities23,906 24,643

Non-current liabilities

Employee benefits473 465

Borrowings10,000 10,089

Deferred tax liabilities13,995 9,899

Derivative financial liabilities1,299 -

Total non-current liabilities25,767 20,453

TOTAL LIABILITIES49,673 45,096

NET ASSETS166,301 153,754

EQUITY

Share capital122,579 123,334

Reserves328 (493)

Retained earnings43,394 30,913

TOTAL EQUITY166,301 153,754

Explanation of variances

Cash and cash equivalents are up on PFI due to the higher profit during the PFI period, a reduction in inventory holding cost, and also

due to timing of tax payments. This coupled with an increase in the value of biological assets (due to increases in gross margin and

average size at balance sheet date) have led to a significant increase in net assets. Trade and other payables are lower than PFI due

to timing of capital expenditure, feed purchases and other creditor payments. Deferred tax liabilities were greater than PFI as a result

of a combination of these same factors.

2018: BIG IDEAS START HERE

91

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

c. Prospective statement of changes in equity
ActualProspective

20182018

$000$000

Balance at beginning of period158,675 144,617

Issue of shares61 -

Change in other reserves(1,467) 288

Total profit for the period16,125 14,149

Dividends paid(7,093) (5,300)

Balance at End of Year166,301 153,754

Equity breakdown by component

Share capital122,579 123,334

Reserves328 (493)

Retained earnings43,394 30,913

Total equity166,301 153,754

Explanation of variances

Total equity is higher than PFI due to the higher profit during the PFI period and the movements in cash flow hedge reserve as a result

of changes in forward currency contract positions and movements in foreign exchange rates.

NEW ZEALAND KING SALMON | ANNUAL REPORT FY18

92

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

d. Prospective statement of cash flows
ActualProspective

20182018

Operating Activities$000$000

Receipts from customers161,212 142,534

Payments to suppliers and employees(132,482) (125,966)

Interest received164 -

Interest paid(597) (478)

Feed supplier settlement150 -

Income tax paid(3,609) (4,567)

Net cash flows from operating activities24,838 11,523

Investing Activities

Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment19 -

Purchase of property, plant and equipment(14,022) (11,065)

Purchase of intangible assets(88) -

Net cash flow from investing activities(14,091) (11,065)

Financing Activities

Drawdown of revolving loan124 -

Government grants received148 -

Gross proceeds from share issue42 -

Repayment of shareholder advances(89) -

Payment of finance lease liabilities(98) -

Payment of dividends(7,093) (5,300)

Net cash flows from financing activities(6,966) (5,300)

Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents3,781 (4,842)

Cash and cash equivalents at 1 July10,647 5,489

Cash and cash equivalents at 30 June14,428 647

Explanation of variances

Receipts from customers are up as a result of increases in harvest value and average sales price vs PFI. Purchases of property, plant

and equipment are up on PFI due to timing of capital projects. Payment of dividends are up due to the FY17 1.0 cent per share special

dividend.

2018: BIG IDEAS START HERE

93

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

INDEPENDENT
AUDITOR’S REPORT

Opinion

We have audited the financial statements of New Zealand King Salmon Investments Limited (“the company”) and its subsidiaries

(together “the group”) on pages 64 to 93, which comprise the consolidated statement of financial position of the group as at 30 June 2018,

and the consolidated statement of comprehensive income, consolidated statement of changes in equity and consolidated statement of

cash flows for the year then ended of the group, and the notes to the consolidated financial statements including a summary of significant

accounting policies.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements on pages 64 to 93 present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial

position of the group as at 30 June 2018 and its consolidated financial performance and cash flows for the year then ended in accordance

with New Zealand equivalents to International Financial Reporting Standards and International Financial Reporting Standards.

This report is made solely to the company’s shareholders, as a body. Our audit has been undertaken so that we might state to the company’s

shareholders those matters we are required to state to them in an auditor’s report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by

law, we do not accept or assume responsibility to anyone other than the company and the company’s shareholders, as a body, for our audit

work, for this report, or for the opinions we have formed.

Basis for opinion

We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (New Zealand). Our responsibilities under those standards

are further described in the Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements section of our report.

We are independent of the group in accordance with Professional and Ethical Standard 1 (revised) Code of Ethics for Assurance Practitioners

issued by the New Zealand Auditing and Assurance Standards Board, and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance

with these requirements.

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.

Ernst & Young provides taxation services to the company and have performed other assurance services including review of the interim financial

statements and performance of agreed upon procedures on sustainability information of the group. Partners and employees of our firm may

deal with the group on normal terms within the ordinary course of trading activities of the business of the group. We have no other relationship

with, or interest in, the group.

Key audit matters

Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgement, were of most significance in our audit of the consolidated financial

statements of the current year. These matters were addressed in the context of our audit of the consolidated financial statements as a whole,

and in forming our opinion thereon, but we do not provide a separate opinion on these matters. For each matter below, our description of

how our audit addressed the matter is provided in that context.

We have fulfilled the responsibilities described in the Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements section of the audit

report, including in relation to these matters. Accordingly, our audit included the performance of procedures designed to respond to our

assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements. The results of our audit procedures, including the procedures

performed to address the matters below, provide the basis of our audit opinion on the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

A member firm of Ernst & Young Global Limited

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT TO THE SHAREHOLDERS

OF NEW ZEALAND KING SALMON INVESTMENTS LIMITED

REPORT ON THE AUDIT OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NEW ZEALAND KING SALMON fi ANNUAL REPORT FY18

94

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AUDITOR’S REPORT

A member firm of Ernst & Young Global Limited
VALUATION AND EXISTENCE OF BIOLOGICAL ASSETS

Why significantHow our audit addressed the key audit matter

At 30 June 2018, the consolidated statement of financial position

includes biological assets (live salmon) of $79.5 million with a

biomass of 5,391 metric tonnes measured at fair value less costs

to sell. This includes a fair value increase above cost of

$36.8 million in the carrying amount.

This is a key audit matter because the company’s estimation

of the fair value of biological assets involves estimation of year

end biomass, and a valuation model that relies on significant

estimation including:

»period end and future biomass growth to harvest;

»future fish mortalities;

»forecast sale prices;

»costs to harvest date and sale;

»sales product mix, and;

»weight based recognition of the present value of gross margin

The company’s disclosures are included in Note 15 to the group

financial statements.

Our approach to live salmon valuation focused on the following

procedures. We:

»evaluated the appropriateness of key estimations and

assumptions and their impact on discounted future cash flows;

»tested the mathematical accuracy of discounted cash

flow forecasts;

»agreed key estimation inputs used by the company in their

model to source data and to board approved budgets;

»involved our valuation specialists in the evaluation and testing

of the mathematical logic and accuracy of the calculation

in the valuation model and of the discount rate used; and

»challenged the accuracy of model inputs compared

to historical actual values and considering the accuracy

of previous input forecasts.

Our approach to live salmon existence focused on the following

procedures. We:

»agreed a sample of the records of fish transfers to seafarms;

»considered the key inputs used by the company in estimating

growth and biomass;

»tested controls over fish quantity and biomass adjustments

to the livestock recording system;

»agreed significant quantity and biomass adjustments

made by the company in the livestock recording system

to source data;

»performed analytical procedures over feed conversion

to biomass;

»considered the accuracy of previous internal forecasts of

average fish weight, and quantity of fish harvested compared

to the livestock recording system; and

»considered the appropriateness, sufficiency, and clarity

of biological assets disclosures included in the group

financial statements.


2018: BIG IDEAS START HERE

95

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AUDITOR’S REPORT

A member firm of Ernst & Young Global LimitedA member firm of Ernst & Young Global Limited
GOODWILL IMPAIRMENT ASSESSMENT

Why significantHow our audit addressed the key audit matter

At 30 June 2018, the consolidated statement of financial

position includes goodwill acquired in business combinations of

$39.3 million, assigned to three cash generating units (CGUs).

This is a key audit matter because the annual impairment

assessment of goodwill involves significant judgements related

to future cash flow forecasts, discount rate and terminal growth

rates assumptions.

The company’s disclosures are included in Note 17 to the group

financial statements.

Our approach focused on the following procedures. We:

»evaluated the basis of the group’s CGU determination;

»assessed the allocation of goodwill to CGUs;

»evaluated the appropriateness of key assumptions and

their impact on estimated future cash flows;

»tested the mathematical accuracy of future cash flow

forecasts;

»involved our valuation specialists in assessing the discount rate

and terminal growth rate applied;

»agreed inputs used by the company in their model to assess

impairment, to board approved budgets, and compared these

with historical actual results. We also considered the accuracy

of previous internal forecasts;

»performed sensitivity analyses on key future cash flow

forecast assumptions, including earnings before interest,

tax, depreciation and amortisation; weighted average cost

of capital and capital expenditure levels, to understand the

impact of reasonably possible changes in key assumptions;

»compared the calculated recoverable values to the associated

carrying amounts, and assessed whether any impairment

charges were required; and

»considered the appropriateness, sufficiency, and clarity of

goodwill disclosures included in the group financial statements.

VALUATION OF SEA FARM RELATED ASSETS

Why significantHow our audit addressed the key audit matter

At 30 June 2018, the consolidated statement of financial position

includes sea farm assets recorded within property, plant and

equipment of $24.0 million, and related marine licenses and

resource consents recorded within intangible assets of $3.5 million.

This is a key audit matter because the annual assessment of

remaining useful lives, amortisation periods and identification of

indicators of impairment involves significant judgements related to

future sea farm use, marine licence and resource consent renewal

and environmental compliance.

The company’s disclosures are included in Note 16 and Note 17

to the group financial statements.

Our approach focused on the following procedures. We:

»considered the company’s assessment of compliance with

the resource consents relating to sea farms;

»evaluated the appropriateness of key assumptions used by the

company in their assessment of indicators of impairment of

property, plant and equipment;

»evaluated the appropriateness of key assumptions used by the

company in their determination of remaining useful lives of

significant sea farm assets; and

»considered the appropriateness, sufficiency, and clarity of

property, plant and equipment and marine licence intangible

assets disclosures included in the group financial statements.

A member firm of Ernst & Young Global Limited

NEW ZEALAND KING SALMON ff ANNUAL REPORT FY18

96

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AUDITOR’S REPORT

A member firm of Ernst & Young Global LimitedA member firm of Ernst & Young Global Limited
Information other than the financial statements and auditor’s report

The directors of the company are responsible for the Annual Report, which includes information other than the consolidated financial

statements and auditor’s report which is expected to be made available to us after the date of this auditor’s report.

Our opinion of the consolidated financial statements does not cover the other information and we do not express any form of assurance

conclusion thereon.

In connection with our audit of the consolidated financial statements, our responsibility is to read the other information and, in doing so,

consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the consolidated financial statements or our knowledge obtained during

the audit, or otherwise appears to be materially misstated.

When we read the Annual Report, if we conclude that there is a material misstatements therein, we are required to communicate the matter

to those charged with governance and, if uncorrected, to take appropriate action to bring the matter to the attention of users for whom our

auditor’s report was prepared.

Directors’ responsibilities for the financial statements

The directors are responsible, on behalf of the entity, for the preparation in fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements in

accordance with New Zealand equivalents to International Financial Reporting Standards and International Financial Reporting Standards,

and for such internal control as the directors determine is necessary to enable the preparation of financial statements that are free from

material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

In preparing the consolidated financial statements, the directors are responsible for assessing on behalf of the entity the group’s ability

to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting

unless the directors either intend to liquidate the group or cease operations, or have no realistic alternative but to do so.

Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements

Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements as a whole free from material

misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level

of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (New Zealand) well

always detect material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually

or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these consolidated

financial statements.

A further description of the auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements is located at the External Reporting Board’s

website: https://www.xrb.govt.nz/standards-for-assurance-practitioners/auditors-responsibilities/audit-report-1/. This description forms

part of our auditor’s report.

The engagement partner on the audit resulting in this independent auditor’s report is Bruce Loader.

Chartered Accountants

Christchurch

28 August 2018

A member firm of Ernst & Young Global Limited

2018: BIG IDEAS START HERE

97

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AUDITOR’S REPORT

CORPORATE
GOVERNANCE

The Board of New Zealand King Salmon Investments Limited (the Company) is committed to

ensuring that the Company meets best practice governance principles and maintains the highest

ethical standards. This Corporate Governance Statement provides an overview of the Company’s

governance framework. It is structured to follow the NZX Corporate Governance Code (NZX Code)

and disclose practises relating to the NZX Code’s recommendations.

The Board’s view is that the Company complies with the corporate governance principles

and recommendations set out in the NZX Code apart from specific areas noted in this report.

The Board believes our governance structures and in particular our remuneration approach

meets our strategic objectives. In forming our conclusions we have sought external feedback

from shareholders and advisors to challenge our thinking and validate our findings, which we

have appreciated.

The corporate governance principles and standards of the Company comply with the:

»Financial Markets Authority’s Corporate Governance in New Zealand Principles and Guidelines.

»ASX Corporate Governance Principles and Recommendations.

»NZX and ASX Listing Rules (corporate governance requirements).

The Company’s key corporate governance documents referred to in this statement, including charters and policies, can be found

on the Company’s website, www.kingsalmon.co.nz.

The Company’s Corporate Governance Code was reviewed and updated during June 2018 and is reviewed annually. The Company’s

Corporate Governance Code was approved by the Board on 29 June 2018.

PRINCIPLE 1 – CODE OF ETHICAL BEHAVIOUR

Directors should set high standards of ethical behaviour, model this behaviour and hold management accountable for these

standards being followed throughout the organisation.

RECOMMENDATION 1.1

The Board should document minimum standards of ethical behaviour to which the issuer’s Directors and employees are expected

to adhere (a Code of Ethics).

Code of Ethics

The Board sets a framework of ethical standards for the Company via its Code of Ethics, which is contained in the

Company’s Corporate Governance Code. These standards are expected of all Directors and employees of the Company.

The Code of Ethics covers a wide range of areas including the following:

»Standards of behaviour.

»Conflicts of interest.

»Proper use of Company information and assets.

»Accepting gifts.

»Delegated authorities.

»Compliance with laws and policies.

Senior management dealt with two relatively minor incidents during the year to 30 June 2018 where Company assets were

used inappropriately. In both situations the incidents were dealt with expeditiously.

NEW ZEALAND KING SALMON | ANNUAL REPORT FY18

98

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Every new Director, employee and contractor is provided with a copy of the Code of Ethics and must confirm that they have read
and understand the Code of Ethics. The Code of Ethics is available on the Company’s website.

The Code of Ethics is subject to annual review by the Board.

The Company maintains an interests register, on which Directors and executives disclose any interests such as other directorships,

shareholdings or ownership, which may potentially lead to conflicts or perceived conflicts of interest.

RECOMMENDATION 1.2

An issuer should have a financial product dealing policy which applies to employees and Directors.

Share trading by Company Directors and Employees

The Board of the Company has implemented a formal procedure to handle trading in the Company’s quoted financial products. All Directors,

officers, employees, contractors and advisers of the Company and its subsidiaries (together, the Group) must comply with the procedures set

out in the Financial Products Trading Policy and Guidelines as detailed in the Company’s Corporate Governance Code.

All trading by Directors and senior managers (as defined by the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013) is required to be reported to NZX and

recorded in the Company’s securities trading register. A blackout period is imposed for all Directors and employees between the end of the half

year and full year and the release to NZX of the result for that period. The policy provides that shares may not be traded at any time by any

individual holding material information. The full procedures are outlined in the Securities Trading Policy and Guidelines, which is contained in

the Company’s Code of Ethics.

In addition to the restrictions outlined above, Directors and the senior managers who held or acquired shares in the Company at the time of

listing have entered into escrow arrangements with the Company. Under these arrangements, each escrowed shareholder has agreed not to

sell or otherwise dispose of any of the escrowed shares until the first business day after the Company’s preliminary announcement has been

released to NZX and ASX in respect of its financial results for the year ending 30 June 2018.

PRINCIPLE 2 – BOARD COMPOSITION & PERFORMANCE

To ensure an effective Board, there is a balance of independence, skills, knowledge, experience and perspectives.

Director Independence

The factors the Company takes into account when assessing the independence of its Directors are set out in the NZX Listing Rules and

ASX Corporate Governance Principles and Recommendations.

A Director is considered to be independent if a Director is not an executive of New Zealand King Salmon, nor has been within the last five

years, and if the Director has no direct or indirect interest or relationship that could reasonably influence the Director’s decisions in relation

to the Company.

As a result of the formal BetterBoards evaluation undertaken during the year the Board confirms the designation of John Ryder, Paul Steere

and Mark Hutton as independent directors. Noting Paul Steere resigned as CEO of NZKS in 2009.

The Board has also determined that the Chairman will be an independent director. It is also intended, in the medium term, to have

an equal number of independent directors. The board will continue to assess the appropriate options and opportunities to achieving this goal.

The Board will review any determination it makes on a Director’s independence on becoming aware of any new information that may affect

that Director’s independence. For this purpose, Directors are required to ensure they immediately advise the Board of any new or changed

relationship that may affect their independence or result in a conflict of interest.

2018: BIG IDEAS START HERE

99

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

RECOMMENDATION 2.1
The Board of an issuer should operate under a written charter which sets out the roles and responsibilities of the Board.

Responsibilities of the Board

The Board is the ultimate decision-making body of the Company and appoints the Chief Executive Officer and Managing Director (CEO)

to whom it delegates the responsibility of managing day to day operations.

The Board is responsible for setting the strategic direction of the Company, directing the Company and enhancing shareholder value

in accordance with good corporate governance principles.

In addition to the duties and obligations of the Board under the Companies Act 1993 (the Act) and the NZX Listing Rules, the functions

of the Board include:

»Appointing the CEO.

»Providing counsel to, and reviewing the performance of, the CEO and senior management.

»Reviewing and approving the strategic, business and financial plans prepared by management.

»Monitoring performance against the strategic, business and financial plans.

»Approving major investments and divestments.

»Ensuring ethical behaviour by the Company, Board, management and employees.

»Assessing its own effectiveness in carrying out its functions.

The Board monitors these matters by receiving reports and plans from management and appropriate experts, and by maintaining

an active programme of Company site visits.

The Board uses committees to address certain issues that require detailed consideration by members of the Board who have specialist

knowledge and experience. The Board retains ultimate responsibility for the functions of its committees and determines their responsibilities.

The Board has a statutory obligation to maintain responsibility for certain matters. It also deals directly with issues relating to the

Company’s mission, appointments to the Board, strategy, business and financial plans.

Details of the Board’s role, composition, responsibilities, operation, policies and committees are provided in the Company’s Corporate

Governance Code.

RECOMMENDATION 2.2

Every issuer should have a procedure for the nomination and appointment of Directors to the Board.

Director nomination and appointment

The Board is responsible for appointing Directors. The Nominations and Remuneration Committee manages the appointment process for

new Directors and the re-election of existing Directors in order to make a recommendation to the Board. When considering an appointment,

the Committee will undertake a thorough check of the candidate and background. Where the Board determines a person is an appropriate

candidate, shareholders are notified of that and are provided with all material information that is relevant to the decision on whether to elect

or re-elect a Director.

The Nominations and Remuneration Committee also has responsibility for reviewing the composition of the Board to ensure that the

Company has access to the most appropriate balance of skills, qualifications, experience, perspectives and background to effectively

govern the Company.

During the year the Board has developed a skills matrix setting out the key skills they believe are necessary for governance of the Company.

The Board has determined that to operate effectively and to meet its responsibilities it requires competencies in key disciplines covering

business acumen, strategic ability, governance, industry knowledge, people, finance skills and export markets.

As detailed in the chart below, the size of each section represents a combination of the skills available and the perceived importance

of each of these skills.

NEW ZEALAND KING SALMON | ANNUAL REPORT FY18

100

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Weighted Skills Charts
The skills matrix is used to evaluate whether the collective skills and experience of the Directors meet the Company’s requirements

both currently and into the future.

The composition of the Board is reviewed to ensure that the Company has access to the most appropriate balance of skills, qualifications,

experience, perspectives and background to effectively govern the Company.

A number of areas will be supplemented by on-going director training. The Board noted the range of qualifications, experience, perspectives

and background were appropriate at this time. The average tenure of the current directors is 7.5 years.

RECOMMENDATION 2.3

An issuer should enter into written agreements with each newly appointed Director establishing the terms of their appointment.

Letter of appointment

All new Directors enter into a written agreement with the Company setting out the terms of their appointment.

RECOMMENDATION 2.4 AND 2.8

Every issuer should disclose information about each Director in its annual report or on its website, including a profile of experience,

length of service, independence and ownership interests.

Board of Directors

A profile of each of the Directors is on pages 58 – 59 of this report. The profiles include information on the year of appointment, skills,

experience and background of each Director.

The roles of the Board Chairman, Audit and Finance Committee Chairman, and CEO are not held by the same person.

The Board determines annually on a case-by-case basis on the advice of the Nominations and Remuneration Committee who, in its view,

are Independent Directors. The guidelines set out in the NZX Listing Rules (para.3.3.1) are used for this purpose.

Ownership of the Company’s shares by Directors is encouraged rather than being a requirement. Directors’ ownership interests are

disclosed at page 117.

The Board does not have a tenure policy however it recognises that a regular refreshment programme leads to the introduction of new

perspectives, skills, attributes and experience.

Director period of appoinment0-3 years3-9 years9 years +

Number of Directors*305

*Includes alternate Director

25

%

24

%

12

%

11

%

8

%

6

%

14

%

Weighted Representation Chart

Business Acumen

Strategic Ability

Governance

Industry Knowledge

People

Finance Skills

Export Markets

2018: BIG IDEAS START HERE

101

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

RECOMMENDATION 2.5
An issuer should have a written diversity policy which includes requirements for the Board or a relevant Committee of the Board to set

measurable objectives for achieving diversity (which, at a minimum, should address gender diversity) and to assess annually both the

objectives and the entity’s progress in achieving them.

The Company recognises the value in diversity and seeks to ensure that the Board and workforce of the Company are as diverse as the

community in which we operate. A formal diversity policy has been adopted by the Board on 29 June 2018 and can be found in the Company’s

Corporate Governance Code at https://www.kingsalmon.co.nz/investors/corporate-governance/.

The Company does recruit, promote and compensate on the basis of merit, regardless of gender, ethnicity, religion, age, nationality or union

membership. The Company does require that people in the workplace are treated with respect in accordance with the Company’s Human

Resource Policy and Way We Work document.

The Board is committed to increasing the level of diversity at Board and executive level where ever possible however no measurable objectives

were set for the year ended 30 June 2018. The board is currently reviewing the most appropriate measurable objectives for the year ending

30 June 2019 and will report against its progress in meeting any specific diversity objectives in its 2019 Annual Report.

On 28 March 2018, Carol Chen joined the Board as an Alternate Director for Xin Wang. On 7 June 2018 Nelson Liu replaced Carol Chen

as Alternate Director for Xin Wang.

Responsibility for workplace diversity and the setting of measurable objectives is held by the Nominations and Remuneration Committee.

The gender composition of the Company’s Board and senior leadership team (SLT) is as follows:

As at 30 June 2018As at 30 June 2017

PositionFemaleMaleFemaleMale

Board*1 (13%)7 (87%)1 (14%)6 (86%)

Senior Leadership Team1 (17%)5 (83%)1 (17%)5 (83%)

*Including alternate Directors

Interests Register

The Board maintains an Interests Register. Any Director with an interest in a transaction with the Company must immediately disclose to

the Board the nature, monetary value and extent of the interest. A Director who is interested in a transaction may attend and participate

at a Board meeting at which the transaction is discussed but may not be counted in the quorum for that meeting or vote in respect of the

transaction, unless it is one in respect of which Directors are expressly required by the Companies Act 1993 to sign a certificate.

Particulars of entries made in the Interests Register for the year ended 30 June 2018 are included in the Director Disclosures section on

pages 116.

RECOMMENDATION 2.6

Directors should undertake appropriate training to remain current on how to best perform their duties as Directors of an issuer.

Director Training

The Board does ensure that there is appropriate training available to all Directors to enable them to remain current on how best to

discharge their responsibilities and keep up to date on changes and trends in areas relevant to their work. Directors are provided with

industry information and receive copies of appropriate company documents to enable them to perform their role. The Board has allocated

funding of $1,000 per annum for each Director to provide resources to help develop and maintain skills and knowledge.

Directors are expected to maintain their knowledge of latest governance and business practices in order to perform their duties.

The Board also ensures that new Directors are appropriately introduced to Management and the businesses.

RECOMMENDATION 2.7

The Board should have a procedure to regularly assess Director, Board and Committee performance.

Board Performance Evaluation

The Board annually assesses its effectiveness in carrying out its functions and responsibilities. The Chairman of the Board leads the review

and evaluation of the Board as a whole, and of the Board Committees, against their charters. The Chairman of the Board also engages

with individual Directors to evaluate and discuss performance and professional development

During the year the Board undertook the Institute of Directors’ BetterBoard evaluation. This provided the opportunity for a formal review of

Board operations to ensure best practise was being followed. Several of the conclusions of the BetterBoard evaluation are noted in this report

and have been implemented, particularly in relation to the newly implemented structure of Board committees and nominated participates.

NEW ZEALAND KING SALMON | ANNUAL REPORT FY18

102

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

PRINCIPLE 3 – BOARD COMMITTEES
The Board should use Committees where this will enhance its effectiveness in key areas, while still retaining Board responsibility.

Board Committees

The Board formally reconstituted three committees in June 2018: the existing Nominations and Remuneration Committee, the reformed Audit

and Finance Committee and the new Health, Safety and Risk Committee. Each committee focuses on specific areas of governance

and together they strengthen the Board’s oversight of the Company. Committee membership is reviewed annually.

Each Committee has a written charter that is approved by the Board and sets out its mandate. The charters are reviewed annually with any

proposed changes recommended to the Board for approval. The charters can be found within the Company’s Corporate Governance Code.

Annually each Committee agrees a programme of matters to be addressed over the following 12 month period. The Committees

each annually review their performance against the Committee charter and objectives for the year and report their findings to the Board.

Attendance at Meetings

The table below sets out Director attendance at Board and Committee meetings during the year ended 30 June 2018.

DirectorBoard

Audit & Finance

Committee

Nominations and

Remuneration

Committee

Health, Safety

and Risk

Committee*

John Ryder

(Chair)8/9---

Mark Hutton

(Chair of Nominations & Remuneration Committ)9 /93 / 33 / 3-

Jack Porus9/9-3 / 3-

Thomas Song9/93 / 3--

Paul Steere

(Chair Audit & Risk Committee in FY18)9/93 / 33 / 3-

Xin Wang5/9---

Nelson Liu

(Appointed 6 June 2018)----

Carol Chen (

Appointed 28 March 2018, Resigned 6 June 2018)2/2---

Grant Rosewarne

(Executive Director)9/9---

*First meeting to be held during October 2018.

RECOMMENDATION 3.1

An issuer’s Audit Committee should operate under a written charter. Membership on the Audit and Finance Committee should be

a majority of independent Directors and comprise solely of non-executive Directors of the issuer. The Chair of the Audit and Finance

Committee should not also be the Chair of the Board.

Audit and Finance Committee

The primary function of the Audit and Finance Committee is to assist the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities relating

to the Company:

»To oversee the financial reporting and continuous disclosure processes to ensure that the interests of shareholders are properly

protected in relation to financial reporting and internal control and disclosure maintains integrity, transparency and adequacy.

»To provide the Board with an independent assessment of the Company’s financial position and accounting affairs.

»To oversee the Company’s capital and treasury risk management.

The members of the reformed Committee are all independent non-executive directors, all with accounting and financial background.

The members are Mark Hutton (Chair), Paul Steere and John Ryder. The Chairman of the Audit and Finance Committee and the Board

Chairman are different people.

The Audit and Risk Committee held three meetings during the period ended 30 June 2018 and the members were Paul Steere (Chair), Mark

Hutton and Thomas Song. The agenda items for each meeting generally relate to financial governance, external financial reporting, external

audit, internal controls and processes, and compliance.

2018: BIG IDEAS START HERE

103

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

RECOMMENDATION 3.2
Employees should only attend Audit Committee meetings at the invitation of the Audit Committee.

Meeting Attendance

The CEO and Chief Financial Officer (CFO) are regularly invited to attend Audit and Finance Committee meetings. The committee

also regularly holds private sessions of the committee and external auditors with management excluded.

RECOMMENDATION 3.3 AND 3.4

An issuer should have a Remuneration Committee which operates under a written charter.

Nominations and Remuneration Committee

The Nominations and Remuneration Committee’s role is to assist the Board by:

»Establishment of a clear framework for oversight and management of the Company’s remuneration structure, policies, procedures

and practices to ensure the Company remuneration is fair and reasonable.

»Defining the roles and responsibilities of the Board and senior management.

»Reviewing and making recommendations on Board composition and succession.

In particular, the Nominations and Remuneration Committee’s role is to ensure that the Board is balanced in terms of skills and knowledge

and to ensure that the method of nomination and appointment of Directors is transparent.

Under the Nominations and Remuneration Committee Charter, the Committee shall comprise of, where ever possible, a majority

of independent Directors.

The current members of the Committee are Mark Hutton (Chair), Paul Steere (both of whom are independent non-executive Directors)

and Jack Porus (nominated as a Director by Oregon Group Limited and thus not independent).

The Committee held three meetings during the year ended 30 June 2018.

RECOMMENDATION 3.5

An issuer should consider whether it is appropriate to have any other Board Committees as standing Board Committees.

All Committees should operate under written charters.

Health, Safety and Risk Committee

The Company has since 2015 operated a management Health & Safety Steering Group, generally meeting quarterly and with attendance

by a Board Director.

The Board’s commitment to ensuring a safe and healthy workplace for team members, contractors and visitors has now led to it establishing a

Health, Safety and Risk Committee during June 2018.

The primary functions of the Health, Safety and Risk Committee are:

»To assist the Board to provide leadership and policy for health and safety.

»To assist the Board to fulfil its responsibilities and to ensure compliance with all legislative and regulatory requirements in relation

to the health and safety practices of the Company as those activities affect employees and contractors.

»To support the ongoing improvement of health and safety in the workplace.

»Ensure and overview the identification of risk to the Company’s operations, both financial and non-financial, the mitigation measures

in place and such further measures to be enacted so risk is managed to as satisfactory a level as practical.

The nominated members of the new Committee are Paul Steere (Independent Chair) and Thomas Song (nominated as a Director by

Oregon Group Limited and thus not independent).

RECOMMENDATION 3.6

The Board should establish appropriate protocols that set out the procedure to be followed if there is a takeover offer for the issuer.

Takeover Protocols

The Board has documented and adopted a series of protocols to be followed in the event of a takeover offer being made, including

communication between insiders and any bidder.

It is proposed the reformed Audit and Finance Committee will oversee the protocols and act as the takeover committee, assuming there

are no related parties. The Committee would have responsibility for managing any takeover offer in accordance with the Board protocols and

the New Zealand Takeovers Code.

NEW ZEALAND KING SALMON | ANNUAL REPORT FY18

104

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

PRINCIPLE 4 – REPORTING AND DISCLOSURE
The Board should demand integrity in financial and non-financial reporting, and in the timeliness and balance of corporate disclosure.

RECOMMENDATION 4.1

An issuer’s Board should have a written continuous disclosure policy.

Shareholder Communications and Market Disclosure

The Company’s Board is committed to the principle that high standards of reporting and disclosure are essential for proper accountability

between the Company and its investors, employees and stakeholders.

The Company achieves these commitments, and the promotion of investor confidence, by ensuring that trading in its shares takes place in

an efficient, competitive and informed market. The Company has in place a written Shareholder Communications and Market Disclosure Policy

designed to ensure this occurs. The policy includes procedures intended to ensure that disclosure is made in a timely and balanced manner

and in compliance with the NZX Listing Rules, such that:

»All investors have equal and timely access to material information concerning the Company, including its financial situation,

performance, ownership and governance.

»Company announcements are factual and presented in a clear and balanced way.

The Company is committed to the promotion of investor confidence by ensuring that the trading of Company shares takes place in an

efficient, competitive and informed market. The CFO is responsible for the Company’s compliance with NZX and ASX continuous disclosure

requirements and the Board is advised of, and considers, continuous disclosure issues at each Board meeting or whenever else required.

Significant market announcements, including the preliminary announcement of the half year and full year results, the financial statements

for those periods, and any advice of a change in earnings forecast are approved by the Board.

Directors consider at each Board meeting whether there is any material information which should be disclosed to the market.

RECOMMENDATION 4.2

An issuer should make its Code of Ethics, Board and Committee charters and the policies recommended in the NZX Code,

together with any other key governance documents, available on its website.

Governance Policies and Charters

The Company’s key corporate governance documents, including charters and policies, can be found at

https://www.kingsalmon.co.nz/investors/corporate-governance.

RECOMMENDATION 4.3

Financial reporting should be balanced, clear and objective. An issuer should provide non-financial disclosure at least annually,

including considering material exposure to environmental, economic and social sustainability risks and other key risks.

Financial and Non-Financial Reporting

The Board is responsible for ensuring the integrity and timeliness of its financial reporting. As noted above under ‘Board Committees’,

the Audit and Finance Committee monitors financial reporting risks in relation to the preparation of the financial statements.

The Audit and Finance Committee, with the assistance of management, works to ensure that the financial statements are founded on a sound

system of risk management and internal control and that the system is operating effectively in all material respects in relation to financial

reporting risks.

The Audit and Finance Committee oversees the quality and integrity of external financial reporting including the accuracy, completeness,

balance and timeliness of financial statements. It reviews half-year and annual financial statements and makes recommendations to

the Board concerning accounting policies, areas of judgement, compliance with financial reporting standards, stock exchange and legal

requirements, and the results of the external audit. All matters required to be addressed and for which the Committee has responsibility were

addressed during the period under review.

All interim and full-year financial statements are prepared in accordance with relevant financial standards.

Both financial and non-financial disclosures are made at least annually, including reporting of material exposure to environmental, economic

and social sustainability risks and other key risks. The Company has a strategic target to develop best-in-class sustainability reporting and to

measure and report on key sustainability aspects affecting its businesses.

The Company’s Sustainability Report for 2018 is included in this report at pages 18 – 19, and provides details of the continuing growth and

improvements in the Company’s initiatives in this area. The Company-wide report draws on 5 of the United Nations’ Sustainable Development

Goals focusing on the food sector and aquaculture industry both nationally and globally. The five Goals being focused on are: decent work and

economic growth, climate action, good health and well-being, responsible consumption and production, and life below water.

2018: BIG IDEAS START HERE

105

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

PRINCIPLE 5 – REMUNERATION
The remuneration of Directors and senior management should be transparent, fair and reasonable.

Remuneration Report Introduction

This Remuneration Report outlines the Company’s overall reward strategy for the year ended 30 June 2018 and provides detailed information

on the remuneration arrangements in this period for the Directors of the Company, including the CEO, and other nominated executives.

The Company’s Remuneration Policy, which may be amended from time to time, is reviewed at least once a year. The Company has

also established a number of additional policies to support a strong governance framework and uphold ethical behaviour and responsible

decision making.

Remuneration Policy

The Nominations and Remuneration Committee is responsible for making recommendations to the Board on remuneration policies and

packages for Directors, the CEO and nominated executives. The primary objectives of the Remuneration Policy are to provide a competitive

and flexible structure that reflects market practice but is tailored to the specific circumstances of the Company and which reflects each

person’s duties and responsibilities to attract, motivate and retain people of the appropriate quality. This includes the company responsibility

to monitor diversity and ensure pay equity.

The Nominations and Remuneration Committee reviews market data on remuneration structure and quantum. The remuneration packages

of the CEO and nominated executives are structured to include a Short Term Incentive Scheme (STI Scheme) that is directly linked to the

overall financial and operational performance of the Company. The CEO and nominated executives may also be invited to participate in the

Company’s Long Term Incentive Scheme (LTI Scheme). The long-term benefits of the LTI Scheme are currently solely conditional upon the

Company share price meeting certain performance criteria, details of which are outlined below.

Remuneration Structure

In accordance with best practice corporate governance, the structure of non-executive Director remuneration is separate and distinct

from the remuneration of the CEO and other executives.

Components of Compensation - Non-Executive Directors

a) Remuneration

The Board seeks to set aggregate remuneration for non-executive Directors at a level which provides the Company with the ability to

attract and retain Directors of the highest calibre, whilst incurring a cost which is acceptable to shareholders.

No remuneration is payable to non-executive Directors unless it is approved by the Company’s shareholders. The NZX Listing Rules specify

that shareholders can approve a per Director remuneration amount or an aggregate Directors’ fee pool. Shareholders approved an aggregate

fee pool of $465,000 at the November 2017 Annual General Meeting and no adjustment will be sought at the 2018 Annual Meeting.

The aggregate remuneration paid to non-executive Directors and the manner in which it is apportioned amongst Directors is reviewed

annually, with any proposed increase in the aggregate pool put to shareholders for approval at the Company’s next Annual Shareholders

Meeting. The Board reviews its fees to ensure the Company’s non-executive Directors are fairly remunerated for their services, recognising

the level of skill and experience required to fulfil the role and to enable the Company to attract and retain talented non-executive Directors.

The process involves benchmarking against a group of peer companies. In addition the Board reviews the Committee structure and

appropriate level of resourcing required to make an on-going contribution to long term value creation. During the year the Board made

changes to the committee structure including the formation of the Health, Safety and Risk Committee, bringing an additional focus to

an area considered to be a key driver for the Company.

Non-executive Directors have no entitlement to any performance-based remuneration or participation in any share-based incentive schemes.

This policy reflects the differences in the role of the non-executive Directors, which is to provide oversight and guide strategy, and the role

of management, which is to operate the business and execute the Company’s strategy. Non-executive Directors are encouraged to be

shareholders, but are not required to hold shares in the Company.

Each non-executive Director receives a fee for services as a Director of the Company. An additional fee is also paid for being a member of the

Board’s Nominations and Remuneration Committee, Audit and Finance Committee, and Health, Safety & Risk Committee. The payment of an

additional fee recognises the additional time commitment required by Directors who serve on those committees. Directors are also entitled to

be reimbursed for costs associated with carrying out their duties.

NEW ZEALAND KING SALMON | ANNUAL REPORT FY18

106

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Annual fees paid to the non-executive Directors of the Company for the period 1 July 2017 to 30 June 2018 were as follows:
Fees for serving on CommitteesTotal

DirectorBase Fee

Audit & Risk

Committee

Nominations and

Remuneration Committee

Base &

Committee fees

John Ryder

(Chair)$99,750--$99,750

Mark Hutton$56,375$5,125$6,250$67,750

Jack Porus$56,375-$3,125$59,500

Thomas Song$56,375$5,125-$61,500

Paul Steere$56,375$10,250$3,125$69,750

Xin Wang$56,601--$56,375

Remuneration of CEO and Executives

The number of employees of the Company (including former employees), not being Directors, who received remuneration and other benefits

in excess of $100,000 in the period 1 July 2017 to 30 June 2018 is set out in the remuneration bands detailed below:

Number of employees

RemunerationFY18FY17

$100,000 to $109,99995

$110,000 to $119,99973

$120,000 to $129,99927

$130,000 to $139,99963

$140,000 to $149,99934

$150,000 to $159,99913

$160,000 to $169,9991-

$170,000 to $179,99921

$220,000 to $229,999-1

$230,000 to $239,99911

$240,000 to $249,99911

$260,000 to $269,9991-

$300,000 to $309,999-1

$330,000 to $339,9991-

$440,000 to $449,99911

$490,000 to $499,999-1

* Includes redundancy payments, other prescribed fringe benefits and the option value of LTI Scheme shares

As set out in further detail below, the total remuneration and value of other benefits paid to the CEO (including under the STI Scheme and

LTI Scheme detailed below) for the year ended 30 June 2018 was $695,955 (2017: $764,028).

Components of Compensation – CEO and Other Nominated Executives

b) Structure

The Company aims to reward the CEO and nominated executives with a level and mix of remuneration commensurate with their position

and responsibilities within the Group, so as to:

»Reward them for Company, performance against targets set by reference to appropriate benchmarks and key performance indicators.

»Align their interests with those of shareholders.

»Ensure total remuneration is competitive by market standards.

Remuneration consists of both fixed and variable remuneration components. The variable remuneration component comprises the

STI Scheme and the LTI Scheme.

The proportion of fixed remuneration and variable remuneration is established for the CEO and for each nominated executive by the

Board, following recommendations from the Nominations and Remuneration Committee and the CEO (in the case of the nominated

executives only).

The remuneration packages for the CEO and nominated executives are all subject to Board approval. There were no material changes to

the remuneration structures or targets for the 2018 year.

2018: BIG IDEAS START HERE

107

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The mix of fixed versus variable ‘at risk’ remuneration payable in respect of 2018 versus 2017 was as follows:
i) Fixed annual remuneration

Remuneration levels are reviewed annually to ensure that they are appropriate for the responsibility, qualifications and experience of the

CEO and each nominated executive and are competitive with the market. In addition the overall mix of variable compensation and their terms

are also considered when setting and/or reviewing fixed remuneration.

The CEO and nominated executives receive their fixed annual remuneration in cash and a limited range of prescribed fringe benefits such

as superannuation, motor vehicle and health insurance. The total employment cost of any remuneration package, including fringe benefit tax,

is taken into account in determining an employee’s fixed annual remuneration.

For the financial year ended 30 June 2018, the CEO received $502,520 in fixed annual remuneration. By comparison, the CEO received

$512,371 in fixed annual remuneration for the financial year ended 30 June 2017.

ii) Variable remuneration – STI Scheme

The objective of the STI Scheme is to link the achievement of the annual financial and operational targets with the remuneration received

by the executives charged with meeting those targets. The total potential remuneration under the STI Scheme is set at a level so as to provide

sufficient incentive to the executive to achieve the targets such that the cost to the Company is flexible and in line with the trading outcome

for the year.

Actual STI Scheme payments granted to the CEO and each nominated executive depend on the extent to which specific targets set at the

beginning of the year are met. The target for 2017 and 2018 are directly related to achieving the pro-forma operating EBITDA result detailed

in the PDS.

OTHER

SLT

CEO

0500000100000015000002000000

Fixed

At Risk

Fixed vs At Risk Remuneration FY 2018

OTHER

SLT

CEO

Fixed

At Risk

0500000100000015000002000000

Fixed vs At Risk Remuneration FY 2017

NEW ZEALAND KING SALMON | ANNUAL REPORT FY18

108

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

In future the targets may include a weighted combination of:
»At least 60% for meeting budget or target pro-forma operating EBITDA for the Group.

»Up to 30% for meeting budget or target asset efficiency measures such as Return on Capital Employed for the Group.

»Any balance for strategic objectives and other contributions.

The Nominations and Remuneration Committee considers the performance against the targets and determines the amount, if any, to be

allocated to the CEO and nominated executives. STI Scheme payments are delivered as a taxable cash bonus and are payable on completion

of the annual audited financial statements.

It should be noted that the level of remuneration detailed in this report for the CEO includes the STI bonus actually paid in 2018 relating to

performance in the 2017 financial year. The total cost for the CEO and other nominated executives of the STI Scheme for 2017 was $412,249

and the total accrual for 2018 is $357,385.

The CEO received $115,697 in STI Scheme payments in 2018 relating to performance in the 2017 financial year and the total accrual for 2018

is $117,664.

STI Scheme payment values are set as a percentage of base cash remuneration, being 30% for the CEO and 25% for the other nominated

executives for the financial year ended 30 June 2018. For the financial year ended 30 June 2018 there were six executives in the STI Scheme,

unchanged from the 2017 year.

In addition to the STI Scheme the Board reserves the ability to pay ad hoc bonus payments to any employee, again either directly related

to the trading outcome or a specific performance target. For the financial year ended 30 June 2018, there were no ad hoc bonus payments to

the CEO or other nominated executives (in 2017, $192,000 was paid to the CEO and other nominated executives, relating to the IPO, of which

the CEO received $87,000).

iii) Variable remuneration – LTI Scheme

The LTI Scheme has been designed to link reward with key performance indicators that drive sustainable growth in shareholder value over

the long term. The objectives of the LTI Scheme are to:

»Align the CEO and nominated executives’ interests with those of shareholders.

»Help provide a long term focus.

»Retain high calibre senior employees by providing an attractive equity-based incentive that builds an ownership of the Company

mindset, encouraging executives to think and act like owners.

The hurdle rate used for the LTI scheme is an absolute share price growth hurdle, which is more challenging over time than a relative

TSR approach. This approach only rewards executives if the shareholders also do well.

Under the LTI Scheme, the CEO and nominated executives are offered an interest free loan which is to be applied to acquire shares in the

Company. Shares acquired under the LTI Scheme are held by a custodian and will only vest to the employee if he or she is still employed by the

Company after three years from the date of issue. All dividends paid during this period are offset against the loan balance. Once the shares

vest, the employee still remains obligated to repay the outstanding balance of the loan. If an employee leaves employment before the expiry

of the three year period, the custodian may exercise a call option to have the employee’s beneficial interest in the shares transferred to it in

consideration of the custodian taking the balance of the loan. Any shares so transferred can be used for future grants or alternatively the

custodian is authorised to sell that employee’s shares with the proceeds applied to repay the balance of the loan, with any deficit covered

by the Company and any surplus retained by the Company.

Although performance rights are the most prevalent LTI instrument in Australasia the company believes the issue of shares and loans is

more relevant for NZKS. The structure is well understood by executives and more closely aligns to the security held by shareholders. In addition

the economic return achieved by executives is more challenging under the current terms.

Each employee’s loan amount (which determines how many shares will be acquired) is set as a percentage of their base salary and selected

employees will be offered a loan for this amount if the criteria set by the Board are met. For the first three years of the LTI Scheme from

2016, the criterion has been the achievement of a compounding gross Total Shareholder Return of 12.5% (including all distributions) over

the reference share price of $1.12, for those executives who joined the scheme at the initial issue at the time of the IPO in October 2016,

and $1.77 for those who joined the scheme in September 2017. The reference share price for any new participants will be set at the time

of joining the scheme.

An offer may be made under the LTI Scheme to the CEO and nominated executives each financial year and is based on individual performance

as assessed by the annual appraisal process. If an executive does not sustain a consistent level of high performance they will not be nominated

for participation in the LTI Scheme. The Nominations and Remuneration Committee reviews all nominated executives, with participation in

the LTI Scheme subject to final Board approval. The Board has retained the discretion to vary the applicable criteria for each offer under the

LTI Scheme. Once the Board has fixed the criteria for a specific offer under the LTI Scheme, those performance hurdles cannot be varied in

respect of that offer.

A total of 993,671 shares were allocated in establishing the LTI Scheme at the time of IPO in October 2016, with matching interest free loans

of $1,112,911, being an issue price of $1.12 per share. Of this total the CEO received 308,880 shares.

A further 317,515 shares were allocated in September 2017, being 270,274 at an issue price of $1.22 per share (being a 12.5% Total Shareholder

Return over the initial $1.12 IPO share price, of which the CEO received 94,833 shares) along with matching interest free loans of $329,734,

and 47,241 shares at an issue price of $1.77 per share to new nominated executives, along with matching interest free loans of $83,617.

During the year, a number of employees left the Company, resulting in the forfeiture of 215,738 shares, the consequent exercise of call

options and redemption of gross loans of $244,747.

2018: BIG IDEAS START HERE

109

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

As at 30 June 2018, the CEO holds 403,713 shares under the LTI Schemes, which have not yet vested. There is a total of $439,757 in loans
outstanding relating to those shares, after applying dividends paid by the Company, to reduce the loan balances.

LTI Scheme loan amounts are set as a percentage of base cash remuneration, being 30% for the CEO and between 5% and 20% for other

nominated executives in respect of the financial year ended 30 June 2018. As at ended 30 June 2018, there were 40 nominated executives

in the LTI Scheme, compared with 24 as at 30 June 2017.

If performance hurdles are achieved a further 311,101 shares will be issued under the LTI Scheme relating to the financial year ended

30 June 2018. The CEO’s entitlement is for 90,510 shares.

iv) Senior Executive Share Ownership Scheme

The CEO and certain other executives were participants in an executive share ownership scheme prior to the IPO, in which participants have

been provided with an interest free loan of up to 200% of the amount which the senior executive invests in the Company. At the time of the

IPO 3,176,878 shares were held by executives via the Ownership Scheme, partly funded by interest free loans of $1,287,500. The CEO holds

1,937,170 shares under the Ownership Scheme, supported by a loan of $700,000.

These shares which have been subject to sale restrictions since the IPO were released from escrow on announcement of the 2018 financial

results. Also during the year, one executive holding 114,714 shares left the scheme, as a consequence repaying the related loan of $46,875.

Shares held by the CEO and nominated executives

The total numbers of shares allocated under the Senior Executive Share Ownership Scheme and LTI Schemes as at 30 June 2018 are as follows:

It should be noted under the relevant accounting standards the loans granted to participants in both the Executive Share Ownership Scheme

Allocation DateVesting DateNumber of Shares

Scheme

Balance

at start

of year

Granted

during

the year

Vested

during

the year

Lapsed or

transferred

during

the year

Balance at

the end of

the year

Senior Executive Share

Ownership Scheme

Various 2011-201629 August 2018 3,176,878 - - 114,714 3,062,164

LTI IPO Scheme19 October 201619 October 2019 993,671 - - 202,714790,957

LTI 2017 Scheme29 September 20171 September 2020 -317,515 - 13,024304,491

4,170,549 317,515 - 330,4524,157,612

Allocation

Date of SharesScheme

Allocation Cost

at Grant Date

P&L

Amortisation

Various 2011-2016Senior Executive Share

Ownership Scheme

$1,287,500$160,654

19 October 2016LTI IPO Scheme$1,112,911$42,816

29 September 2017LTI 2017 Scheme$413,351$59,340

and LTI Schemes participants are not recorded on the company balance sheet.

As at the end of the financial year ended 30 June 2018, the total balance owing under the loans advanced to the CEO under the Senior

Executive Share Ownership Scheme and the LTI Schemes was $1,139,757 (2017: $1,040,197).

Under accounting standard IFRS 2 Share Based Payments, as the LTI shares are classified as options, the total cost of each annual allocation

is spread across the three years of the vesting period from the date of issue.

As a result the total expense recorded in the Statement of Comprehensive Income for the financial year ended 30 June 2018 is $262,784

(2017: $142,206) including $128,750 (2017: $77,738) incurred for the CEO. The total cost relating to each financial year will include the pro rata

share of several allocations.

The total annual cost of the LTI scheme relating to shares issued from 2016 and 2017 is detailed below:

It should be noted the table above records the accounting cost to the company. It does not relate to the economic benefit received

by the executive, which is directly linked to the share price movement over the vesting period.

NEW ZEALAND KING SALMON ff ANNUAL REPORT FY18

110

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Employee Share Ownership Scheme
At the time of the Company’s initial public offering, it established an Employee Share Ownership Scheme to facilitate an increase in the

level of participation by employees as shareholders, which improves the alignment of interests between employees and shareholders.

Under the scheme, each eligible employee was offered an interest free loan up to $5,000 to fund 50% of the subscription price for the

shares which employee wished to acquire in the Company. Employees are obliged to repay their loans when the shares are sold or when

they leave the Company.

A total of 187,076 shares were issued at the time, supported by loans of $104,762 from the Company. During the period, employees holding

20,538 shares have left the Company, and a further 3,982 shares have been sold by current employees, resulting in repayment of $13,731

of loans. As at 30 June 2018, the following shares were held by employees under the Employee Share Ownership Plan:

Allocation DateVesting DateNumber of Shares

Scheme

Balance at

start of year

Sold during

the year

Balance at the

end of the year

Employee Share Ownership Plan19 October 201619 October 2016187,07624,520162,556

PRINCIPLE 6 - RISK MANAGEMENT

Directors should have a sound understanding of the material risks faced by the issuer and how to manage them. The Board regularly

verifies that the issuer has appropriate processes that identify and manage potential and material risks.

RECOMMENDATION 6.1

An issuer should have a risk management framework for its business and the issuer’s Board should receive and review regular reports.

Risk Management Framework

The Board is responsible for ensuring that key business and financial risks are identified, and that appropriate controls and procedures are

in place to effectively manage those risks.

The newly formed Health, Safety and Risk Management Committee has overall responsibility for ensuring that Company’s risk management

framework is appropriate and that it appropriately identifies, considers and manages risks.

Risk management is an integral part of the Company’s business. A risk management framework incorporating a risk register is used to identify

those situations and circumstances in which the Company may be materially at risk and for which risk mitigation activities are appropriate.

This approach is intended to provide a comprehensive, company-wide awareness of risk in senior management, supported by a consistent

method of identifying, assessing, controlling, monitoring and reporting existing and potential risks to the Company’s business.

The Company has designed and implemented a risk framework for the oversight and management of financial and non-financial business

risks, as well as related internal compliance systems that are designed to:

»Team members and contractors work in a safe and healthy working environment.

»Optimise the return to stakeholders whilst also protecting their interests.

»Safeguard the Company’s assets, biological assets and the environment.

»Maintain food quality standards and product quality.

»Fulfil the Company’s strategic objectives.

»Manage the financial and non- financial risks associated with the business.

The Board has delegated responsibility to the Health, Safety & Risk Committee to establish and regularly review the Company’s risk

management framework. As part of this framework the Committee is tasked with identifying situations and circumstances in which the

Company may be materially at risk, and initiating appropriate action through the Board or CEO. A risk management policy is overseen

by the CEO and supports a comprehensive approach to the management of those risks identified as material to the Company’s operations.

Risk management is a standing item on the agenda for Health, Safety & Risk Committee meetings, with detailed reports provided by

senior management.

The CEO and CFO have provided the Board, through the Audit and Finance Committee, with assurances that, in their opinion, financial

records have been properly maintained, that the financial statements comply with those accounting standards under which the Company

must report and that the statements give a true and fair view of the Company’s financial position and performance. These representations

are given on the basis that a sound system of internal controls and risk management is operating effectively in all material respects in relation

to financial reporting.

In managing the Company’s business risks, the Board approves and monitors policy and procedures in areas such as treasury management,

financial performance, taxation and delegated authorities.

2018: BIG IDEAS START HERE

111

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Insurance
The Company has insurance policies in place covering most areas where risk to its assets and business can be insured at a reasonable cost.

RECOMMENDATION 6.2

An issuer should disclose how it manages its health and safety risks and should report on their health and safety risks, performance

and management.

Health and Safety

The Board and management are committed to promoting a safe and healthy working environment for everyone working in, or interacting

with, the Company. The Company strives for continuous improvement that takes us beyond compliance in health, safety and wellness.

This includes the reviewing of our health and safety policy statement as well as the systems and processes that support our safety objectives.

The Company’s Health, Safety & Risk Committee Charter creates a shared responsibility for all our team members and contractors to so

far as reasonably practicable take all steps in providing a working environment that promotes health and wellbeing. Effective controls based

on industry knowledge and best practice guidelines inform and support our risk management across all areas of the business.

The Company uses a risk-based approach, having identified a number of critical risk areas, being:

»Maritime operations

»Fire, electricity and natural events

»Heights and lifting

»Confined spaces

»Mobile plant and equipment

»Construction activity

Each of these critical risk areas has initiatives designed to eliminate, isolate or minimise risk.

The Company uses a combination of leading and lagging performance measures in health and safety. One of these measures is Lost-Time

Injury Frequency Rate (LTIFR). Our current LTIFR performance reflects the commitment and effort the business has dedicated to health

and safety, with a 1% increase over the last 12 months. The relative severity of LTIFR in days lost has reduced from 10 days to 5.5 days over

the past 12 months.

Further information is included in the Sustainability Report at pages 18-19.

PRINCIPLE 7 – AUDITORS

The Board should ensure the quality and independence of the external audit process.

RECOMMENDATION 7.1 AND 7.2

The Board should establish framework for the issuer’s relationship with its external auditors.

The external auditor does attend the issuer’s Annual Shareholders Meeting to answer questions from shareholders in relation to the audit.

External Auditor

The Company’s Audit and Finance Committee is responsible for oversight of the Company’s external audit arrangements to safeguard

the integrity of financial reporting. The Company maintains an External Auditor Independence Policy to ensure that audit independence

is maintained, both in fact and appearance.

The policy covers the following areas:

»Appointment of the external auditor.

»Provision of other assurance services by the external auditor.

»Pre-approval process for the provision of other assurance services.

»External auditor lead and engagement partner rotation.

»Hiring of staff from the external auditor.

»Relationships between the external auditor and the Company.

»Reporting on fees and non-audit work.

NEW ZEALAND KING SALMON | ANNUAL REPORT FY18

112

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The role of the external auditor is to audit the financial statements of the Company in accordance with applicable auditing standards
in New Zealand and to report on its findings to the Board and shareholders of the Company.

The External Auditor Independence Policy is available in the Corporate Governance Code which is available on the Company’s website

at https://www.kingsalmon.co.nz/investors/corporate-governance/.

Ernst & Young is the Company’s current external auditor. Bruce Loader is the current audit engagement partner, in his second year following

a partner rotation after the 2016 audit. Fees paid to Ernst & Young are included in note 29 of the notes to the financial statements.

Both the Company’s Audit and Finance Committee Charter and the External Auditor Independence Policy require the external auditor to

be independent, recognising the importance of facilitating frank dialogue between the Audit and Finance Committee, the auditor and

management. The External Auditor Independence Policy requires that the audit partner is rotated after a maximum of five years.

The Audit and Finance Committee Charter requires the Committee to facilitate the continuing independence of the external auditor

by assessing the external auditor’s independence, qualifications, overseeing and monitoring their performance. This involves monitoring

all aspects of the external audit, including the appointment of the auditor, the nature and scope of its audit and reviewing the auditor’s

service delivery plan.

The auditor has been invited to attend the Annual Shareholders’ Meeting and will be available to answer questions about the audit

process and the independence of the auditor.

RECOMMENDATION 7.3

Internal audit functions should be disclosed.

Internal Audit

The Company does not have an internal audit function. However, the Company does have a quality and compliance team dedicated

to food hygiene in relation to the processing of harvested fish through to finished goods that are dispatched to the end customer.

The management Health and Safety Steering Group has overseen internal safety audits throughout the farming and manufacturing process.

The Health, Safety and Risk Committee will now oversee this function. The objective of the quality and compliance team is to enhance and

protect the organisational value of the Company by providing risk-based and objective assurance.

Where necessary, external expertise is obtained for specific audit activities.

Independent Professional Advice

With the approval of the Audit and Finance Committee, Directors are entitled to seek independent professional advice on any issue related

to the fulfilment of his or her duties, at the Company’s expense.

PRINCIPLE 8 – SHAREHOLDER RELATIONS

The Board should respect the rights of shareholders and foster constructive relationship with shareholders that encourage them

to engage with the issuer.

RECOMMENDATION 8.1

An issuer should have a website where investors and interested stakeholders can access financial and operational information

and key corporate governance information about the issuer.

Shareholder Relations

The Company is committed to maintaining a full and open dialogue with its shareholders and other stakeholders. Annual and interim reports,

NZX releases, governance policies and charters and a variety of corporate information is posted onto the Company’s website.

The Company’s preference is for electronic communications in the interests of sustainability and efficiency, however each shareholder is

entitled to receive a paper copy of each annual and interim report.

The Company has an Annual Meeting page in the Investors section on its website. Documents relating to meetings are available.

Shareholder meetings will be held at a time and location to encourage participation in person by shareholders. Annual meetings are currently

held in the Nelson / Marlborough region, reflecting the head office and production locations for the Company.

The Company’s website includes a range of information relevant to shareholders and others concerning the operation of the Company,

including information about the sites we operate, Aquaculture Best Management Practices (BMP), certifications, our brands and the corporate

governance policies of the Company.

2018: BIG IDEAS START HERE

113

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

RECOMMENDATION 8.2
An issuer should allow investors the ability to easily communicate with the issuer, including providing the option to receive

communications from the issuer electronically.

Electronic Communications

Shareholders have the option of receiving their communications electronically.

Contact details for the Company’s head office are available on the website.

RECOMMENDATION 8.3

Shareholders should have the right to vote on major decisions which may change the nature of the company in which they

are invested in.

Major Decisions

Directors’ commitment to timely and balanced disclosure is set out in its Shareholder Communications and Market Disclosure Policy

and includes advising shareholders on any major decisions. Where voting on a matter is required the Board encourages investors to attend

the meeting or to send in a proxy vote. Shareholders may raise matters for discussion at the Annual Shareholders’ Meeting either in person

or by emailing the Company with a question to be asked.

RECOMMENDATION 8.4

Each person who invests money in a company should have one vote per share of the company they own equally with other shareholders.

Voting

The Company conducts voting at its Annual Shareholder Meetings by way of poll and on the basis of one share, one vote.

RECOMMENDATION 8.5

The board should ensure that the annual shareholders notice of meeting is posted on the issuer’s website as soon as possible and at least

28 days prior to the meeting.

Notice of Meeting

The Company’s Notice of Meeting will be available at least 28 days prior to the meeting on the Shareholder Meetings page in the

Investors’ section of the website.

NEW ZEALAND KING SALMON | ANNUAL REPORT FY18

114

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

DIRECTOR
DISCLOSURES

John

Ryder

Mark

Hutton

Jack

Porus

Thomas

Song

Paul

Steere

Xin

Wang


Nelson

Liu

*

Grant

Rosewarne

James V.

Kilmer

Justin

Reynolds

New Zealand King Salmon Investments Limited

New Zealand King Salmon Co. Limited

New Zealand King Salmon Exports Limited

New Zealand King Salmon USA Incorporated

New Zealand King Salmon Pty Limited

NZKS Custodian Limited

King Salmon Limited

MacCure Seafoods Limited

Omega Innovations Limited

Ora King Limited

Regal Salmon Limited

Southern Ocean Salmon Limited

Southern Ocean Seafoods Limited

The following persons were Directors of New Zealand King Salmon Investments Limited and its subsidiaries during the year ended 30 June 2018:

* Nelson Liu is alternate director for Xin Wang, appointed 6 June 2018.

2018: BIG IDEAS START HERE

115

DIRECTOR DISCLOSURES

Name of Director /
Senior Executive

No. of SharesNature of InterestAcquisition /

Disposal

ConsiderationDate

John Ryder

(Chair) 150,000 Beneficial owner Acquisition $1.93 per share 1 March 2018

Paul Steere45,172 Beneficial Owner Acquisition $2.00per share 8 March 2018

Grant Rosewarne26,100 Beneficial Owner Acquisition $1.91 per share 1 March 2018

Grant Rosewarne2,300 Beneficial Owner Acquisition $1.92 per share 5 March 2018

Grant Rosewarne2,981 Beneficial Owner Acquisition $2.04 per share 16 March 2018

Grant Rosewarne245 Beneficial Owner Acquisition $2.22 per share 10 April 2018

Grant Rosewarne7, 76 0 Beneficial Owner Acquisition $2.29 per share 27 April 2018

Grant Rosewarne4,736 Beneficial Owner Acquisition $2.33 per share 2 May 2018

INTERESTS REGISTER

The following entries were made in the interests register of the Company during the year ended 30 June 2018:

Share Dealings by Directors

Dealings by Directors and key senior managers during the year ended 30 June 2018 as entered in the Interest Register of the Company

are as follows:

Disclosure of interest in the Interests Register

Details of Directors disclosures entered in the interests register for the Company as at 30 June 2018 were as follows:

DirectorName of InterestNature of Interest

John Ryder

(Chair)Direct Capital V Management LimitedDirector

Mark HuttonDirect Capital IV Investments LimitedDirector

Direct Capital V Management LimitedDirector

Sirius Capital Investments LimitedDirector

Scales Corporation LimitedDirector

Evergreen Partners Limited (and subsidiaries)Director

Jack PorusGlaister EnnorPartner

Thomas SongOregon Group Limited (and subsidiaries)Director

Paul SteereClean Seas Seafood Pty Ltd, South Australia (ASX)Director*

Nelson Airport LimitedChairman

Nelson Marlborough Institute of TechnologyDeputy Chairman

Allan Scott WinesChairman

Kaynemaile LimitedChairman

Aquaculture Advisory Panel, South Pacific CommunityChairman

Xin WangChina Resources Ng Fung Limited (and subsidiaries)Director

Nelson LiuChina Resources Ng Fung Limited (and subsidiaries)Alternate to Xin Wag

Grant RosewarneAquaculture New ZealandDirector

Seafood New ZealandDirector

* Resigned 30 June 2018

NEW ZEALAND KING SALMON | ANNUAL REPORT FY18

116

DIRECTOR DISCLOSURES

Name of DirectorNumber of ordinary shares
Beneficial

Number of ordinary shares

Non-Beneficial

John Ryder

(Chair)2,167,644 -

Mark Hutton - 500,000

Jack Porus 372,457 -

Paul Steere 780,010 -

Grant Rosewarne 2,541,737 -

Relevant Interests

The table below records the ordinary shares in which Directors had a relevant interest as at 30 June 2018.

Neither Thomas Song, Xin Wang, nor Nelson Liu held any relevant interests (beneficial or non-beneficial) as at 30 June 2018.

Use of Company Information by Directors

No notices were received from Directors pursuant to section 145 of the Companies Act 1993 to use Company information, received in their

capacity as Directors, which would otherwise not have been available to them.

Directors’ Liability

As permitted by the Company’s Constitution and in accordance with Section 162 of the Companies Act 1993, the Company has indemnified

all Directors and arranged Directors’ and Officers’ Liability Insurance which ensures that, to the extent permitted by law, Directors will incur no

monetary loss as a result of actions undertaken as Directors. Certain actions are specifically excluded, for example, the incurring of penalties

and fines, which may be imposed in respect of breaches of the law.

Shareholder Information

As at 30 June 2018 there were 138,475,358 ordinary shares on issue in the Company, each conferring on the registered holder the right

to vote on any resolution at a meeting of shareholders, held as follows:

Size of HoldingNumber of Shareholders%Number of Shares held%

1 - 4,9991,45554.88 2,884,361 2.08

5,000 - 9,99950519.053,437,009 2.48

10,000 - 49,99956621.35 10,094,905 7. 2 9

50,000 - 99,999572.15 3,563,9512.57

100,000 - 499,999501.89 10,655,335 7. 69

Over 500,000180.68107,839,797 7 7. 8 9

2018: BIG IDEAS START HERE

117

DIRECTOR DISCLOSURES

ShareholderNumber of Shares% of shares
Oregon Group Limited 55,622,358 40.16

New Zealand Central Securities Depository Limited 18,858,11913.61

China Resources Ng Fung Limited 13,798,944 9.96

FNZ Custodians Limited 4,086,9092.95

Grantley Bruce Rosewarne & Julie Ann Rosewarne 2,093,902 1.51

John William Dudley Ryder 1,989,6441.43

Investment Custodial Services Limited1,848,2111.33

Susan Glenice Paine & Harvey Te Hawe Ruru & Richard Murray Paine 1,785,715 1.28

NZKS Custodian Limited 1,311,1860.94

Forsyth Barr Custodians Limited986,6700.71

MA Investments Two Limited 920,734 0.66

Custodial Services Limited 814,7170.58

Kevin Glen Douglas & Michelle McKenney Douglas 710,529 0.51

Richard Pelham Garland & Susan Jane Garland 697,322 0.50

Andrew Christopher Clark & Christine Elizabeth Clark 620,259 0.44

Peter Plowman 606,184 0.43

Howard Nicholas Paul Bretherton & Bretherton trustee Limited 588,394 0.42

Sirius Capital Investments Limited 500,000 0.36

Sturgess Consulting Limited 489,704 0.35

Paul James Steere 446,957 0.32

20 Largest Shareholders

Set out below are details of the 20 largest shareholders of the Company as at 30 June 2018:

ShareholderNumber of SharesClass of Share

New Zealand King Salmon Investments Limited 65,852,206 Ordinary

Oregon Group Limited 55,622,348 Ordinary

China Resources Ng Fung Limited 13,798,944 Ordinary

Guardians of New Zealand Superannuation 8,957,866 Ordinary

Substantial Product Holders

Set out below are details of the substantial product holders of the Company as advised by notice to the Company as at 30 June 2018.

The number of shares shown below is as advised in the most recent substantial product holder notices given to the Company and may not

be their holding as at 30 June 2018.

The total number of ordinary shares on issue as at 30 June 2018 was 138,475,358.

Annual Shareholders Meeting

The Company’s 2018 Annual Shareholders’ Meeting will be held in Blenheim on 6th November 2018. Shareholders will be given an opportunity

at the meeting to ask questions and comment on relevant matters. Notice of Meeting will be sent to shareholders in advance of the meeting.

Exercise of NZX Disciplinary Powers

NZX Limited did not exercise any of its powers under Listing Rule 5.4.2 in relation to the Company during the year ended 30 June 2018.

Donations

Donations of $16,977 were made by the Company during the year ended 30 June 2018 (2017: $42,971).

NEW ZEALAND KING SALMON | ANNUAL REPORT FY18

118

DIRECTOR DISCLOSURES

CORPORATE
DIRECTORY

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

John William Dudley Ryder

Independent Non-Executive Chairman

Grantley Bruce Rosewarne

Chief Executive Officer and Managing

Director

Mark Robert Hutton

Independent Non-Executive Director

Jack Lee Porus

Non-Executive Director

Paul James Steere

Independent Non-Executive Director

Thomas Chai Leng Song

Non-Executive Director

Wang Xin

Non-Executive Director

Nelson Liu

Alternate for Wang Xin

BANKERS

The Bank of New Zealand

Deloitte Centre

Level 6, 80 Queen Street

Auckland

AUDITOR

Ernst & Young (EY)

Level 4/93

Cambridge Terrace

Christchurch

New Zealand

LAWYERS

Chapman Tripp

Level 35, 23 Albert Street

Auckland

New Zealand

Gascoigne Wicks

79 High Street

Blenheim

New Zealand

Duncan Cotterill

197 Bridge Street

Nelson

New Zealand

NEW ZEALAND KING

SALMON INVESTMENTS

LIMITED

Ticker: NZK

Listed on the NZX Main Board and

as a Foreign Exempt Listing on the ASX

NZ company number: 2161790

Registered Office

93 Beatty Street

Annesbrook

Nelson 7011

New Zealand

Postal Address

PO Box 1180

Nelson 7040

New Zealand

Telephone

+64 3 548 5714

Website

www.kingsalmon.co.nz

Investor Relations

investor@kingsalmon.co.nz

SHARE REGISTRY

Computershare Investor

Services Limited

Level 2

159 Hurstmere Road

Takapuna,

Auckland 0622

New Zealand

+64 9 488 8777

enquiry@computershare.co.nz

Computershare Investor

Services Pty Limited

Yarra Fall

452 Johnston Street

Abbotsford VIC 3001

Australia

+61 3 9415 4083

enquiry@computershare.co.nz

2018: BIG IDEAS START HERE

119

CORPORATE DIRECTORY

GLOSSARY
ASX

Australian Securities Exchange

CEO

Chief Executive Officer

EBIT

Earnings Before Interest and Tax

EBITDA

Earnings Before Interest, Tax, Depreciation

and Amortisation

FCR

Feed Conversion Ratio

FOB

Free on Board, a term which means that the price for

goods includes delivery at the seller’s expense on to a vessel

at a named port and no further. The buyer bears all costs

thereafter (including costs of sea freight)

FY

Financial Year

G&G

Gilled and gutted weight

GAAP

New Zealand Generally Accepted Accounting Practice

Group

New Zealand King Salmon Investments Limited

and its subsidiaries

IPO

Initial Public Offering

LTI Scheme

Long term incentive scheme

MT

Metric Tonnes

New Zealand King Salmon

New Zealand King Salmon Investments Limited

NPAT

Net Profit after Tax

NZ IFRS

New Zealand equivalents to International Financial

Reporting Standards

NZX

New Zealand Stock Exchange

PDS

Product Disclosure Statement dated 23 September

2016 as published by New Zealand King Salmon

Investments Limited

PFI

Prospective Financial Information contained in the

New Zealand King Salmon Investments Limited Registered

Product Disclosure Statement dated 23 September 2016

SLT

Senior leadership team, comprising CEO, and senior

management direct reports

NEW ZEALAND KING SALMON | ANNUAL REPORT FY18

120

GLOSSARY

FROM EGG TO PLATE
OMEGA INNOVATIONS

A separate division based in Nelson

creating high-value brands from

our by-products.

OUR OPERATIONS

HATCHERY &

BROODSTOCK FACILITIES

We operate three freshwater

facilities for broodstock, smolt

and as risk mitigation.

BROODSTOCK

Broodstock are tagged and

monitored throughout their

lives – we assess the best

female and male salmon.

SEAFARMS

Following transfer from freshwater

hatcheries, salmon are grown for

up to 18 months in one of our

seawater farms.

HARVEST

Salmon are humanely harvested

at sea and transferred back

to our processing facilities in

Nelson on the same day.

PROCESSING

Salmon are weighed, gilled and

gutted. Depending on final use,

further processing can take place

(including filleting, portioning

or smoking).

BRANDING

The highest quality whole

salmon are branded Ōra King

and individually numbered for

traceability. A wide variety of fresh,

smoked and value-added products

are dispatched to retail customers

under our Regal, Southern Ocean,

Big Catch and Omega Plus brands.

AQUACULTURE

This division includes eight

operational sea farm sites

in the Marlborough Sounds,

three hatcheries in Golden

Bay and Canterbury, and an

aquaculture office in Picton.

OUR DIVISIONS

PROCESSING

This division includes HACCP-

approved processing facilities in

Nelson involved in the primary

and value-added processing of our

salmon products. The Processing

division also includes Engineering

and Quality & Compliance.

SUPPLY CHAIN

Based in Nelson, the Supply Chain

division includes Production

Planning, Logistics, Coldstore

and Pick n Pack/Dispatch teams,

Procurement, Customer Services,

ICT and Program Management.

SALES, MARKETING

& NEW PRODUCT

DEVELOPMENT (NPD)

Our Sales, Marketing and NPD

teams are grouped by market

and by channel. Our Auckland

office supports our domestic sales

and marketing activity, and we

have various international Sales

Representative arrangements.

Our marketing and NPD teams

are mainly based in Nelson.

CORPORATE SERVICES

Based in our head office in

Nelson alongside our CEO office,

the Corporate Services division

comprises our Finance and

Human Resources team members.

FISH WELFARE

Our salmon are treated to

the highest standards of

care, with fish health and

wellness a priority.

2018: BIG IDEAS START HERE

121

FROM EGG TO PLATE

NEW ZEALAND KING SALMON INVESTMENTS LIMITED
93 Beatty Street, Annesbrook, Nelson 7011

www.kingsalmon.co.nz

Data sourced from publicly available filings. Our datasets may not be complete. Automated analysis can produce errors. If you believe any data on this page is incorrect, please contact us at hello@nzxplorer.co.nz. For informational purposes only. Not investment advice.