ANZ Group Holdings Limited logo

ANZ Bank New Zealand Disclosure Statement

Annual Report15 November 2018ANZFinancials

ANZ BANK NEW ZEALAND LIMITED
ANNUAL REPORT AND REGISTERED BANK DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 SEPTEMBER 2018

NUMBER 90 | ISSUED NOVEMBER 2018

ANZ BANK NEW ZEALAND LIMITED 2018 ANNUAL REPORT
CONTENTS

Annual Report and Glossary of Terms 2

DISCLOSURE STATEMENT SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Financial Statements Bank Financial Strength Dashboard 89

Consolidated Financial Statements 4 Other Information 92

Notes to the Financial Statements 8

Registered Bank Disclosures 58

Directors’ Statement 83

Independent Auditor’s Report

84

ANNUAL REPORT

FOR T HE YEAR ENDED 30 SEPTEMBER 2018

Pursuant to section 211(3) of the Companies Act 1993, the shareholder of the Bank has agreed that the Annual Report of the Banking

Group need not comply with any of the paragraphs (a), and (e) to (j) of subsection (1) and s ubsection (2) of section 211.

Accordingly, there is no information to be provided in this Annual Report other than the financial statements for the year ended 30

September 2018 and the audit report on those financial statements.

For and on behalf of the B oard of Directors:

Rt H

on Sir John Key, GNZM AC David Hisco

Chair Executive Director

15 November 2018 15 November 2018

GLOSSARY OF TERMS

In this Registered Bank Disclosure Statement (Disclosure Statement) unless the context otherwise requires:

Bank means ANZ Bank New Zealand Limited.

Banking Group, We or Our means the Bank and all its controlled entities.

Immediate Parent Company means ANZ Holdings (New Zealand) Limited.

Ultimate Parent Bank means Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited.

Overseas Banking Group means the worldwide operations of Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited including its controlled

entities.

New Zealand business means all business, operations, or undertakings conducted in or from New Zealand identified and treated as if it

were conducted by a company formed and registered in New Zealand.

NZ Branch means the New Zealand business of the Ultimate Parent Bank.

ANZ New Zealand means the New Zealand business of the Overseas Banking Group.

OnePath means OnePath Life (NZ) Limited.

UDC means UDC Finance Limited.

Registered Office is Ground Floor, ANZ Centre, 23-29 Albert Street, Auckland, New Zealand, which is also the Banking Group’s address for

service.

RBNZ means the Reserve Bank of New Zealand.

APRA means t he Australian Prudential Regulation Authority.

the Order means the Registered Bank Disclosure Statements (New Zealand Incorporated Registered Banks) Order 2014.

Any term or expression which is defined in, or in the manner prescribed by, the Order shall have the meaning given in or prescribed by

the Order.

2

FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS

In 2018, we have redesigned our Financial

Statements to better communicate our performance

to stakeholders by reducing complexity

and simplifying our financial note disclosures.

Consolidated Financial Statements

Income Statement 4

Statement of Comprehensive Income

4

Balance Sheet 5

Cash Flow Statement

6

Statement of Changes in Equity 7

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Basis of Preparation Financial Instrument Disclosures

1. About our Financial Statements

8

15. Financial Risk Management

28


16. Fair Value of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities

40

Financial Performance


17. Assets Charged as Security for Liabilities

43

2. Operating Income

10

and Collateral Accepted as Security for Assets

3. Operating Expenses

12

18. Offsetting

44

4. Income Tax

13

5. Dividends

14

Non-Financial Assets

6. Segment Reporting

14

19. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

45

Financial Assets Equity

7. Cash and Cash Equivalents

16

20. Shareholders' Equity

47

8. Trading Securities

17

21. Capital Management

48

9. Derivative Financial Instruments

18

10. Available-for-sale Assets

21 Consolidation and Presentation

11. Net Loans and Advances

22

22. Controlled Entities

49

12. Provision for Credit Impairment

23

23. Structured Entities

50


24. Transfers of Financial Assets

51

Financial Liabilities

25. Assets and Liabilities Held for Sale

52

13. Deposits and Other Borrowings

25

14. Debt Issuances

26


Other Disclosures

26. Related Party Disclosures

53

27. Commitments and Contingent Liabilities

54

28. Compensation of Auditors

56

3

ANZ BANK NEW ZEALAND LIMITED 2018 ANNUAL REPORT
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

INCOME STATEMENT

2018 2017

For the year ended 30 September Note NZ$m NZ$m

Interest income 6,390 6,198

Interest expense

(3,240)

(3,161)

Net interest income 2 3,150 3,037

Other operating income 2

716

604

Net funds management and insurance income 2

405

329

Share of associates' profit 2 5 5

Operating income

4,276

3,975

Operating expenses 3

(1,517)

(1,468)

Profit before credit impairment and income tax 2,759 2,507

Credit impairment charge 12

(55)

(62)

Profit before income tax 2,704 2,445

Income tax expense 4

(751)

(680)

Profit for the year 1,953

1,765

STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

2018 2017

For the year ended 30 September NZ$m NZ$m

Profit for the year 1,953

1,765

Other comprehensive income

Items that will not be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss 1

15

Items that may be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss

Reserve movements:

Unrealised losses recognised directly in equity

(27)

(32)

Realised losses transferred to the income statement 5 12

Income tax attributable to the above items 7

6

Other comprehensive income after tax (14)1

Total comprehensive income for the year 1,939

1,766

The notes appearing on pages 8 to 56 form an integral part of these financial statements

4

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The notes appearing on pages 8 to 56 form an integral part of these financial statements

5

BALANCE SHEET

2018 2017

As at 30 September Note NZ$m NZ$m

Assets

Cash and cash equivalents 7

2,200

2,338

Settlement balances owed to the Banking Group 656 536

Collateral paid

1,919

1,415

Trading securities 8 8,024 7,663

Derivative financial instruments 9

8,086

9,878

Available-for-sale assets 10

6,502

6,360

Net loans and advances 11 126,466 117,627

Assets held for sale 25

897

3,065

Life insurance contract assets

-

636

Investments in associates 6 7

Goodwill and other intangible assets 19

3,289

3,275

Investments backing insurance contract liabilities -123

Premises and equipment

325

367

Other assets

642

683

Total assets 159,012 153,973

Liabilities

Settlement balances owed by the Banking Group

2,161

1,840

Collateral received 845 613

Deposits and other borrowings 13

108,008

101,657

Derivative financial instruments 9 8,095 9,826

Current tax liabilities

161

39

Deferred tax liabilities

21

187

Liabilities held for sale 25 334 1,088

Payables and other liabilities

947

1,151

Employee entitlements

120

119

Other provisions 76 66

Debt issuances 14

25,135

24,606

Total liabilities 145,903 141,192

Net assets 13,109

12,781

Equity

Share capital 20 11,888 8,888

Reserves

33

48

Retained earnings

1,188

3,845

Total equity 13,109 12,781

For and on behalf of the Board of Directors:

Rt H

on Sir John Key, GNZM AC David Hisco

Chair Executive Director

15 November 2018 15 November 2018

ANZ BANK NEW ZEALAND LIMITED 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


CASH FLOW STATEMENT



2018 2017

For the year ended 30 September NZ$m NZ$m

Profit after income tax 1,953 1,765





Adjustments to reconcile to net cash provided by/(used in) operating activities:




Depreciation and amortisation 88 80

Loss on sale of premises and equipment

4

2

Impairment of goodwill

-

3

Net derivatives/foreign exchange adjustment 1,150 (662)

Other non-cash movements

(22)

88





Net (increase)/decrease in operating assets:



Collateral paid (504) 895

Trading securities

(361)

4,316

Net loans and advances

(5,927)

(5,916)

Other assets (266) (27)




Net increase in operating liabilities:



Deposits and other borrowings

5,312

3,630

Settlement balances owed by the Banking Group 390 4

Collateral received

232

84

Other liabilities

48

120

Total adjustments


144

2,617

Net cash flows provided by operating activities

1



2,097

4,382

Cash flows from investing activities

Available-for-sale assets:

2




Purchases

(4,368)

(10,803)

Proceeds from sale or maturity 4,246 7,266

Other assets

3

(49)

Net cash flows used in investing activities (119)

(3,586)

Cash flows from financing activities




Debt issuances

3




Issue proceeds 3,385 4,922

Redemptions

(3,991)

(3,899)

Proceeds from issue of ordinary shares

3,000

-

Dividends paid (4,611) (1,695)

Net cash flows used in financing activities


(2,217)

(672)

Net increase / (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

(239)

124

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year 2,439 2,315

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year


2,200

2,439


1

Net cash provided by operating activities includes income taxes paid of NZ$619 million (2017: NZ$605 million).

2

We have reassessed the composition of operating, investing and financing cash flows. Cash flows from available-for-sale assets were previously included in operating activities, and

comparative amounts have been reclassified.

3

Movement in debt issuances (Note 14) also includes an NZ$1,365 million increase (2017: NZ$510 million increase) from the effect of foreign exchange rates, a NZ$246 million decrease

(2017: NZ$247 million decrease) from changes in fair value hedging instruments and a NZ$16 million increase (2017: NZ$24 million increase) of other changes.


The notes appearing on pages 8 to 56 form an integral part of these financial statements


6

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY


Share

capital

Available-

for-sale

revaluation

reserve

Cash flow

hedging

reserve

Retained

earnings

Total

equity

Note NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m

As at 1 October 2016

8,888 - 62 3,760 12,710

Profit or loss - - - 1,765 1,765

Unrealised gains / (losses) recognised directly in equity - 7 (39) - (32)

Realised losses transferred to the income statement - - 12 - 12

Actuarial gain on defined benefit schemes - - - 21 21

Income tax credit / (expense) on items recognised directly in equity - (2) 8 (6) -

Total comprehensive income for the year

- 5 (19) 1,780 1,766

Transactions with Immediate Parent Company in its capacity as owner:

Ordinary dividends paid 5 - - - (1,684) (1,684)

Preference dividends paid 20 - - - (11) (11)

Transactions with Immediate Parent Company in its capacity as owner - - - (1,695) (1,695)

As at 30 September 2017

8,888 5 43 3,845 12,781

Profit or loss - - - 1,953 1,953

Unrealised gains / (losses) recognised directly in equity

- 8 (35) - (27)

Realised losses transferred to the income statement

- - 5 - 5

Actuarial gain on defined benefit schemes - - - 2 2

Income tax credit / (expense) on items recognised directly in equity

- (2) 9 (1) 6

Total comprehensive income for the year - 6 (21) 1,954 1,939

Transactions with Immediate Parent Company in its capacity as owner:



Ordinary shares issued 20

3,000 - - - 3,000

Ordinary dividends paid 5 - - - (4,600) (4,600)

Preference dividends paid 20

- - - (11) (11)

Transactions with Immediate Parent Company in its capacity as owner


3,000 - - (4,611) (1,611)

As at 30 September 2018


11,888 11 22 1,188 13,109



The notes appearing on pages 8 to 56 form an integral part of these financial statements


7

ANZ BANK NEW ZEALAND LIMITED 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


1. ABOUT OUR FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

These are the financial statements for ANZ Bank New Zealand Limited (the Bank) and its controlled entities (together, the ‘Banking Group’) for the year

ended 30 September 2018. The Bank is incorporated and domiciled in New Zealand. The address of the Bank’s registered office and its principal place

of business is ANZ Centre, 23-29 Albert Street, Auckland, New Zealand.

On 15 November 2018, the Directors resolved to authorise the issue of these financial statements.

In 2018, we reviewed the content and structure of the financial statements with the aim of increasing their relevance to stakeholders. This review has

resulted in a number of changes to the financial statements from previous years, including:

• moving disclosures required by the Order to a separate ‘Registered Bank Disclosures’ section of the Disclosure Statement;

• information about the Banking Group’s recognition and measurement policies and key judgements and estimates has been relocated and is

now disclosed within the relevant notes to the financial statements;

• removing immaterial disclosures; and

• aggregating prior year numbers in certain disclosures.

Information in the financial statements is included only to the extent we consider it material and relevant to the understanding of the financial

statements. A disclosure is considered material and relevant if, for example:

• the dollar amount is significant in size (quantitative factor);

• the dollar amount is significant by nature (qualitative factor);

• the user cannot understand the Banking Group’s results without the specific disclosure (qualitative factor);

• the information is critical to a user’s understanding of the impact of significant changes in the Banking Group’s business during the period – for

example: business acquisitions or disposals (qualitative factor);

• the information relates to an aspect of the Banking Group’s operations that is important to its future performance (qualitative factor); and

• the information is required under legislative requirements of the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013 or by the Banking Group’s principal

regulator, RBNZ.

This section of the financial statements:

• outlines the basis upon which the Banking Group’s financial statements have been prepared; and

• discusses any new accounting standards or regulations that directly impact financial statement disclosure requirements.

BASIS OF PREPARATION

These financial statements are general purpose (Tier 1) financial statements prepared by a ‘for profit’ entity, in accordance with the requirements of

the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013. These financial statements comply with:

• New Zealand Generally Accepted Accounting Practice, as defined in the Financial Reporting Act 2013;

• New Zealand equivalents to International Financial Reporting Standards (NZ IFRS) and other applicable Financial Reporting Standards, as

appropriate for publicly accountable for-profit entities; and

• International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS).

We present the financial statements of the Banking Group in New Zealand dollars, which is the Banking Group’s functional and presentation currency.

We have rounded values to the nearest million dollars (NZ$m), unless otherwise stated.

BASIS OF MEASUREMENT

We have prepared the financial information in accordance with the historical cost basis - except the following assets and liabilities which we have

stated at their fair value:

• derivative financial instruments;

• available-for-sale financial assets;

• financial instruments held for trading; and

• financial instruments designated at fair value through profit and loss.

BASIS OF CONSOLIDATION

The consolidated financial statements of the Banking Group comprise the financial statements of the Bank and all its subsidiaries. An entity, including

a structured entity, is considered a subsidiary of the group when we determine that the Bank has control over the entity. Control exists when the

Banking Group is exposed to, or has rights to, variable returns from its involvement with the entity and has the ability to affect those returns through

its power over the entity. We assess power by examining existing rights that give the Banking Group the current ability to direct the relevant activities

of the entity. We have eliminated, on consolidation, the effect of all transactions between entities in the Banking Group.

FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSLATION

TRANSACTIONS AND BALANCES

Foreign currency transactions are translated into the relevant functional currency at the exchange rate prevailing at the date of the transaction. At the

reporting date, monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated into the functional currency at the relevant spot rate.

Any foreign currency translation gains or losses that arise are included in profit or loss in the period they arise.

We measure translation differences on non-monetary items at fair value through profit or loss and report them as part of the fair value gain or loss on

these items. We include any translation differences on non-monetary items classified as available-for-sale financial assets in the available-for-sale

revaluation reserve in equity.





8

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS






9

1. ABOUT OUR FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


ACCOUNTING STANDARDS NOT EARLY ADOPTED

A number of new standards, amendments to standards and interpretations have been published but are not mandatory for the financial statements

for the year ended 30 September 2018, and have not been applied by the Banking Group in preparing these financial statements.


The Banking Group has identified three standards where this applies to the Banking Group and further details are set out below.

NZ IFRS 9 Financial Instruments (NZ IFRS 9)

NZ IFRS 9 is effective for the Banking Group from 1 October 2018. NZ IFRS 9 stipulates new requirements for the impairment of financial assets,

classification and measurement of financial assets and financial liabilities and general hedge accounting. Details of the key requirements and

estimated impacts on the Banking Group are outlined below.


Impairment

NZ IFRS 9 replaces the incurred loss impairment model under NZ IAS 39: Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement (NZ IAS 39) with an

expected credit loss (ECL) model incorporating forward looking information. The ECL model will be applied to all financial assets measured at

amortised cost, debt instruments measured at fair value through other comprehensive income, lease receivables, certain loan commitments and

financial guarantees. Under the ECL model, the following three-stage approach is applied to measuring ECL based on credit migration between the

stages since origination:


• Stage 1: At the origination of a financial asset, a provision equivalent to 12 months ECL is recognised.


Stage 2: Where there has been a significant increase in credit risk since origination, a provision equivalent to lifetime ECL is recognised.


Stage 3: Similar to the current NZ IAS 39 requirements for individual impairment provisions, lifetime ECL is recognised for loans where there is

objective evidence of impairment.


Expected credit losses are probability weighted and determined by evaluating a range of possible outcomes, taking into account the time value of

money, past events, current conditions and forecasts of future economic conditions.


Classification and measurement

There are three measurement classifications under NZ IFRS 9: Amortised cost, Fair Value through Profit or Loss and Fair Value through Other

Comprehensive Income. Financial assets are classified into these measurement classifications taking into account the business model within which

they are managed, and their contractual cash flow characteristics.


The classification and measurement requirements for financial liabilities under NZ IFRS 9 are largely consistent with NZ IAS 39 with the exception that

for financial liabilities designated as measured at fair value, gains or losses relating to changes in the entity’s own credit risk are included in other

comprehensive income. This part of the standard was early adopted by the Banking Group on 1 October 2013.


General hedge accounting

NZ IFRS 9 introduces new hedge accounting requirements which more closely align accounting with risk management activities undertaken when

hedging financial and non-financial risks.


NZ IFRS 9 provides the Banking Group with an accounting policy choice to continue to apply the NZ IAS 39 hedge accounting requirements until the

International Accounting Standards Board’s ongoing project on macro hedge accounting is completed. The Banking Group’s current expectation is

that it will continue to apply the hedge accounting requirements of NZ IAS 39.


Transition to NZ IFRS 9

Other than as noted above under classification and measurement of financial liabilities, NZ IFRS 9 has a date of initial application for the Banking Group

of 1 October 2018. The classification and measurement, and impairment requirements, will be applied retrospectively by adjusting opening retained

earnings at 1 October 2018. The Banking Group does not intend to restate comparatives.


Impact

Impairment

Based on the portfolio of in -scope financial assets held as at 30 September 2018, economic conditions prevailing at that time and management’s

judgements and estimates, the application of NZ IFRS 9 as at 1 October 2018 has resulted in higher aggregate impairment provisions of approximately

NZ$72 million, with an associated decrease in deferred tax liabilities of approximately NZ$20 million. The net impact on total equity is a reduction of

approximately NZ$52 million. These estimates remain subject to change until the Banking Group finalises its financial statements for the year ending

30 September 2019.


Classification and measurement of financial assets

There have been no changes in classification and measurement as a result of the application of the business model and contractual cash flow

characteristics tests.






In the process of applying the Banking Group’s accounting policies, management has made a number of judgements and applied

estimates and assumptions about future events. Further information on the key judgements and estimates that we consider

material to the financial statements are contained within the notes to the financial statements.


ANZ BANK NEW ZEALAND LIMITED 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


1. ABOUT OUR FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

NZ IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (NZ IFRS 15)

NZ IFRS 15 is effective for the Banking Group from 1 October 2018 and replaces existing guidance on the recognition of revenue from contracts with

customers. The standard requires identification of distinct performance obligations within a contract, and allocation of the transaction price of the

contract to those performance obligations. Revenue is then recognised as each performance obligation is satisfied. The standard also provides

guidance on whether an entity is acting as a principal or an agent which impacts the presentation of revenue on a gross or net basis.

The Banking Group has assessed all revenue streams existing at the date of transition to the new standard and determined that the impact of NZIFRS

15 is immaterial given the majority of the Banking Group revenues are outside the scope of the standard. The Banking Group will adopt IFRS 15

retrospectively including restatement of prior period comparatives.

NZ IFRS 16 Leases (NZ IFRS 16)


The final version of NZ IFRS 16 was issued in February 2016 and is not effective for the Banking Group until 1 October 2019. NZ IFRS 16 requires a lessee

to recognise its right to use the underlying leased asset, as a right-of-use asset; and its obligation to make lease payments as a lease liability. NZ IFRS 16

substantially carries forward the lessor accounting requirements in NZ IAS 17 Leases.

The Banking Group is in the process of assessing the impact of the application of NZ IFRS 16 and is not yet able to reasonably estimate the impact on

its financial statements.

2. OPERATING INCOME

2018 2017

NZ$m NZ$m

Net Interest income


Interest income by type of financial asset




Financial assets at amortised cost

5,986

5,736

Trading securities

240

351

Available-for-sale assets

159

106

Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss

5

5

Interest income 6,390 6,198

Interest expense by type of financial liability

Financial liabilities at amortised cost (3,168) (3,023)

Financial liabilities designated at fair value through profit or loss

(72)

(138)

Interest expense

(3,240)

(3,161)

Net interest income


3,150

3,037

Other operating income

(i) Fee and commission income


Lending and credit facility fees 32 35

Non-lending fees and commissions 725 702

Fee and commission income

757

737

Fee and commission expense

(363)

(328)

Net fee and commission income

394

409

(ii) Other income


Net foreign exchange earnings and other financial instruments income

237

129

Derivative valuation adjustments

13

33

Loss on sale of mortgages to NZ Branch (1) (1)

Gain on UDC terminated transaction 20 -

Insurance proceeds 20 -

Other

33

34

Other income

322

195

Other operating income


716

604

Net funds management and insurance income


Net funds management income

217

199

Net insurance income 188 130

Net funds management and insurance income 405 329

Share of associates' profit


5

5

Operating income


4,276

3,975







10

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



2. OPERATING INCOME (continued)






RECOGNITION AND MEASUREMENT

NET INTEREST INCOME

Interest Income and Expense

We recognise interest income and expense for all financial instruments, including those classified as held for trading, available-for-sale-

assets

or designated at fair value, in profit or loss using the effective interest rate method. This method uses the effective interest rate of a

financial asset or financial liability to calculate amortised cost. The effective interest rate is the rate that discounts the stream of estimated

future cash receipts or payments over the expected life of the financial instrument or, when appropriate, a shorter period, to the net

carrying amount of

the financial asset or liability. For assets subject to prepayment, we determine their expected life on the basis of

historical behaviour of the particular asset portfolio - taking into account contractual obligations and prepayment experience.

OTHER OPERATING INCOME

Fee and Commission Income

We recognise fees or commissions:

• that relate to the execution of a significant act (for example, advisory or arrangement services, placement fees and underwriting fees)

when the significant act has been completed; and

• charged for providing ongoing services (for example, maintaining and administering existing facilities) as income over the period the

service is provided.

Net Foreign Exchange Earnings and Other Financial Instruments Income

We recognise the following as net foreign exchange earnings and other financial instruments income:

• exchange rate differences arising on the settlement of monetary items and translation differences on monetary items translated at rates

different to those at which they were initially recognised;

• fair value movements (excluding realised and accrued interest) on derivatives not designated as accounting hedges that we use to

manage interest rate and foreign exchange risk on funding instruments;

• the ineffective portions of fair value hedges and cash flow hedges;

• fair value movements on financial assets and financial liabilities designated at fair value through profit or loss or held for trading; and

• immediately upon sale or repayment of a hedged item, the unamortised fair value adjustments in items designated as fair value hedges

and amounts accumulated in equity related to designated cash flow hedges.

NET FUNDS MANAGEMENT AND INSURANCE INCOME

Net Funds Management Income

We recognise the fees we charge to managed investment schemes and other customers when we have provided the service.

Net Insurance Income

We recognise:

• premiums with a regular due date as income on an accruals basis;

• claims on an accruals basis once our liability to the policyholder has been confirmed under the terms of the contract; and

• change in life insurance contract asset, net of liability for reinsurance, under the Margin of Service (MoS) model.

SHARE OF ASSOCIATES’ PROFIT

The equity method is applied to accounting for associates in the consolidated financial statements. Under the equity method, the Banking

Group’s share of the after tax results of associates is included in the Income Statement and the Statement of Comprehensive Income.






11

ANZ BANK NEW ZEALAND LIMITED 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


3. OPERATING EXPENSES

2018 2017

NZ$m NZ$m

Personnel




Salaries and related costs

820

801

Superannuation costs 29 29

Other 42 26

Personnel expenses


891

856

Premises




Leasing and rental costs

82

80

Other

71

73

Premises expenses


153

153

Technology




Licences and outsourced services 126 125

Other 99 93

Technology expenses


225

218

Other




Advertising and public relations

43

41

Professional fees

45

43

Freight, stationery, postage and telephone

44

45

Charges from Ultimate Parent Bank

52

46

Other 64 66

Other expenses 248 241

Operating expenses


1,517

1,468







RECOGNITION AND MEASUREMENT

OPERATING EXPENSES

Operating expenses are recognised as services are provided to the Banking Group over the period in which an asset is consumed or once a

liability is created.

SALARIES AND RELATED COSTS – ANNUAL LEAVE, LONG SERVICE LEAVE AND OTHER EMPLOYEE BENEFITS

Wages and salaries, annual leave, and other employee entitlements expected to be paid or settled within twelve months of employees

rendering service are measured at their nominal amounts using remuneration rates that the Banking Group expects to pay when the liabilities

are settled.

We accrue employee entitlements relating to long service leave using an actuarial calculation. It includes assumptions regarding staff

departures, leave utilisation and future salary increases. The result is then discounted using market yields at the reporting date. The market yields

are determined from a blended rate of high quality corporate bonds with terms to maturity that closely match the estimated future cash

outflows.

If we expect to pay short term cash bonuses, then a liability is recognised when the Banking Group has a present legal or constructive obligation

to pay this amount (as a result of past service provided by the employee) and the obligation can be reliably measured.






12

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



4. INCOME TAX

INCOME TAX EXPENSE

Reconciliation of the prima facie income tax expense on pre-tax profit with the income tax expense recognised in profit or loss:

2018 2017

NZ$m NZ$m

Profit before income tax


2,704

2,445

Prima facie income tax expense at 28%

757

685

Tax effect of permanent differences:

Imputed and non-assessable dividends (1) (1)

Tax provisions no longer required

(3)

(5)

Non assessable income and non deductible expenditure

(1)

2

Subtotal


752

681

Income tax over provided in previous years

(1)

(1)

Income tax expense


751

680

Current tax expense 910 641

Adjustments recognised in the current year in relation to the current tax of previous years (1) (1)

Deferred tax expense/(income) relating to the origination and reversal of temporary differences (158) 40

Income tax expense 751

680

Effective tax rate


27.8%

27.8%







RECOGNITION AND MEASUREMENT

INCOME TAX EXPENSE

Income tax expense comprises both current and deferred taxes and is based on the accounting profit adjusted for differences in the accounting

and tax treatments of income and expenses (that is, taxable income). We recognise tax expense in profit or loss except to the extent to which it

relates to items recognised directly in equity and other comprehensive income, in which case we recognise directly in equity or other

comprehensive income respectively.

CURRENT TAX EXPENSE

Current tax is the tax we expect to pay on taxable income for the year, based on tax rates (and tax laws) which are enacted at the reporting date.

We recognise current tax as a liability (or asset) to the extent that it is unpaid (or refundable).

DEFERRED TAX ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

We account for deferred tax using the balance sheet method. Deferred tax arises because the accounting income is not always the same as the

taxable income. This creates temporary differences, which usually reverse over time. Until they reverse, we recognise a deferred tax asset, or

liability, on the balance sheet. We measure deferred taxes at th e tax rates that we expect will apply to the period(s) when the asset is realised, or

the liability settled, based on tax rates (and tax laws) that have been enacted or substantially enacted at the reporting date.

We offset current and deferred tax assets and liabilities only to the extent that: they relate to income taxes imposed by the same taxation

authority; there is a legal right and intention to settle on a net basis; and it is allowed under the tax law of the relevant jurisdiction.






13

ANZ BANK NEW ZEALAND LIMITED 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


5. DIVIDENDS

ORDINARY SHARE DIVIDENDS



Amount

per share

Total

Dividend

NZ$m

Dividends

Financial Year 2017

Dividend paid in March 2017 23.5 cents 785

Dividend paid in September 2017 26.9 cents 899

Dividends paid during the year ended 30 September 2017

1,684

Financial Year 2018




Dividend paid in March 2018

23.9 cents 800

Dividend paid in April 2018

44.8 cents 1,500

Dividend paid in April 2018 31.0 cents 1,500

Dividend paid in September 2018 12.6 cents 800

Dividends paid during the year ended 30 September 2018


4,600


IMPUTATION CREDIT ACCOUNT







2018 2017

NZ$m NZ$m

Imputation credits available

4,919

4,196


The imputation credit balance for the Banking Group includes the imputation credit balance in relation to both the New Zealand Resident imputation

group and other companies in the Banking Group that are not in the New Zealand Resident imputation group. The imputation credit balance

available includes imputation credits that will arise from the payment of the amount of provision for income tax as at the reporting date.



6. SEGMENT REPORTING

OPERATING SEGMENTS

The Banking Group is organised into three major business segments for segment reporting purposes - Retail, Commercial and Institutional. Centralised

back office and corporate functions support these segments. These segments are consistent with internal reporting provided to the chief operating

decision maker, being the Bank’s Chief Executive Officer.

Segment reporting has been updated to reflect minor changes to the Banking Group’s structure. Comparative data has been adjusted to be

consistent with the current year’s segment definitions.

Retail

Retail provides a full range of banking and wealth management services to consumer, private banking and small business banking customers. We

deliver our services via our internet and app-based digital solutions and network of branches, mortgage specialists, relationship managers and contact

centres.

Commercial

Commercial provides a full range of banking services including traditional relationship banking and sophisticated financial solutions through

dedicated managers focusing on privately owned medium to large enterprises and the agricultural business segment.

Institutional

The Institutional division services global institutional and corporate customers across three product sets: Transaction Banking, Loans & Specialised

Finance and Markets.

• Transaction Banking provides working capital and liquidity solutions including documentary trade, supply chain financing as well as cash

management solutions, deposits, payments and clearing.

• Loans & Specialised Finance provides loan products, loan syndication, specialised loan structuring and execution, project and export finance,

debt structuring and acquisition finance and corporate advisory.

• Markets provide risk management services on foreign exchange, interest rates, credit, commodities, debt capital markets in addition to

managing the Banking Group’s interest rate exposure and liquidity position.

Other

Other includes treasury and back office support functions, none of which constitutes a separately reportable segment.




14

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



6. SEGMENT REPORTING (continued)


Operating segment analysis








Retail Commercial Institutional Other Total

Year ended 30 September 2018 NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m

Interest income

3,538 2,139 719 (6) 6,390

Interest expense (1,761) (1,169) (394) 84 (3,240)

Net interest income 1,777 970 325 78 3,150

Other operating income 680 21 265 155 1,121

Share of associates' profit

5 - - - 5

Operating income

2,462 991 590 233 4,276

Operating expenses

(1,036) (258) (182) (41) (1,517)

Profit before credit impairment and income tax

1,426 733 408 192 2,759

Credit impairment (charge) / release

(50) 41 (46) - (55)

Profit before income tax 1,376 774 362 192 2,704

Income tax expense (384) (217) (101) (49) (751)

Profit after income tax 992 557 261 143 1,953

Other information

Goodwill

1


1,109 1,052 1,069 - 3,230

Net loans and advances

76,843 42,446 7,166 11 126,466

Customer deposits

70,259 16,842 16,954 - 104,055



Year ended 30 September 2017

Interest income 3,430 2,070 699 (1) 6,198

Interest expense (1,727) (1,170) (339) 75 (3,161)

Net interest income 1,703 900 360 74 3,037

Other operating income 688 21 302 (78) 933

Share of associates' profit 5 - - - 5

Operating income 2,396 921 662 (4) 3,975

Operating expenses (1,005) (259) (189) (15) (1,468)

Profit before credit impairment and income tax 1,391 662 473 (19) 2,507

Credit impairment (charge) / release (35) (51) 24 - (62)

Profit before income tax

1,356 611 497 (19) 2,445

Income tax expense (379) (172) (140) 11 (680)

Profit after income tax

977 439 357 (8) 1,765

Other information


Goodwill

1

1,109 1,052 1,069 - 3,230

Net loans and advances

1

71,942 40,963 7,589 45 120,539

Customer deposits

1

67,796 14,059 14,974 - 96,829

1

Including items reclassified as held for sale.




15

ANZ BANK NEW ZEALAND LIMITED 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


6. SEGMENT REPORTING (continued)

OTHER SEGMENT

The Other segment profit/(loss) after income tax comprises:


2018 2017



NZ$m NZ$m

Central functions

1


15

1

Technology and Group Centre

65

59

Economic hedges

48

(43)

Revaluation of insurance policies from changes in interest rates

15

(25)

Total


143

(8)

1

Central functions’ external revenues for the year ended 30 September 2018 includes the $20 million insurance proceeds (Note 2 Operating Income) that were received from a member of

the Overseas Banking Group.



7. CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS


2018 2017

NZ$m NZ$m

Coins, notes and cash at bank

204

202

Securities purchased under agreements to resell in less than 3 months

136

360

Balances with central banks

1,734

1,776

Settlement balances owed to the Banking Group within 3 months

1

126

-

Cash and cash equivalents 2,200

2,338


Reconciliation of cash and cash equivalents to the balance sheet



2018 2017

NZ$m NZ$m

Cash and cash equivalents per the balance sheet

2,200

2,338

Amounts included in settlement balances receivable / (payable):



Nostro accounts

1


-

170

Overdrawn nostro accounts - (69)

Cash and cash equivalents as per the cash flow statement 2,200 2,439

1

Settlement balances due within 3 months have been recognised in cash and cash equivalents on the balance sheet from 30 September 2018.




16

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS






17

8. TRADING SECURITIES


2018 2017

NZ$m NZ$m

Government securities

4,696

3,299

Corporate and financial institution securities

3,328

4,364

Trading securities 8,024 7,663























Judgement is required when applying the valuation techniques used to measure the fair value of trading securities not valued using

quoted market prices. Refer to Note 16 Fair Value of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities for further details.





RECOGNITION AND MEASUREMENT

Trading securities are financial instruments we either:

• acquire principally for the purpose of selling in the short-term; or

• hold as part of a portfolio we manage for short-term profit making.

We recognise purchases and sales of trading securities on trade date:

• initially, we measure them at fair value; and

• subsequently, we measure them in the balance sheet at their fair value with any revaluation recognised in the profit or loss.


ANZ BANK NEW ZEALAND LIMITED 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


9. DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS



Assets Liabilities Assets Liabilities


2018 2018 2017 2017

Fair value NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m

Derivative financial instruments - held for trading 7,746 (7,023) 9,490 (8,992)

Derivative financial instruments - designated in hedging relationships 340 (1,072) 388 (834)

Derivative financial instruments 8,086 (8,095)

9,878 (9,826)

FEATURES

Derivative financial instruments are contracts:

• whose value is derived from an underlying price index (or other variable) defined in the contract – sometimes the value is derived from more

than one variable;

• that require little or no initial net investment; and

• that are settled at a future date.

Movements in the price of the underlying variables, which cause the value of the contract to fluctuate, are reflected in the fair value of the derivative.

PURPOSE

The Banking Group’s derivative financial instruments have been categorised as follows:

Trading

Derivatives held in order to:

• meet customer needs for managing their own risks.

• manage risk in the Banking Group’s positions that are not part of a designated hedge accounting relationship.

• undertake market making and positioning activities to generate profits from short-term fluctuations in prices or

margins.

Designated in Hedging

Relationships

Derivatives designated into hedge accounting relationships in order to minimise profit or loss volatility by matching

movements to underlying positions relating to:

• hedges of the Banking Group’s exposures to interest rate risk and currency risk.

• hedges of other exposures relating to non-trading positions.

TYPES

The Banking Group offers and uses four different types of derivative financial instruments:

Forwards

A contract documenting the rate of interest, or the currency exchange rate, to be paid or received on a notional

principal obligation at a future date.

Futures

An exchange traded contract in which the parties agree to buy and sell an asset in the future for a price agreed on

the transaction date, with a net settlement in cash paid on the future date without physical delivery of the asset.

Swaps

A contract in which one party exchanges one series of cash flows for another.

Options

A contract in which the buyer of the contract has the right - but not the obligation - to buy (known as a “call option”)

or to sell (known as a “put option”) an asset or instrument at a set price on a future date. The seller has the

corresponding obligation to fulfil the transaction to sell or buy the asset or instrument if the buyer exercises the

option.

RISKS MANAGED

The Banking Group offers and uses the instruments described above to manage fluctuations in the following market factors:

Foreign Exchange

Currencies at current or determined rates of exchange.

Interest Rate

Fixed or variable interest rates applying to money lent, deposited or borrowed.

Commodity

Soft commodities (that is, agricultural products such as wheat, coffee, cocoa, and sugar) and hard commodities (that

is, mined products such as gold, oil and gas).

Credit

Counterparty risk in the event of default.




18

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



9. DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (continued)

DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS – HELD FOR TRADING

The majority of the Banking Group’s derivative financial instruments are held for trading. The fair value of derivative financial instruments held for

trading are:


Assets Liabilities Assets Liabilities


2018 2018 2017 2017

Fair value NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m

Interest rate contracts

Forward rate agreements 5 (4) - -

Futures contracts 7 (10) 5 (24)

Swap agreements 4,242 (3,920) 7,062 (6,335)

Options purchased

3 -

3 -

Options sold

- (1)

- (1)

Total 4,257 (3,935)

7,070 (6,360)

Foreign exchange contracts

Spot and forward contracts

1,179 (889)

615 (696)

Swap agreements 2,248 (2,146) 1,773 (1,895)

Options purchased 34 (3) 17 -

Options sold 2 (24) 2 (27)

Total 3,463 (3,062)

2,407 (2,618)

Commodity contracts and credit default swaps 26 (26)

13 (14)

Derivative financial instruments - held for trading 7,746 (7,023)

9,490 (8,992)


DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS – DESIGNATED IN HEDGING RELATIONSHIPS

The Banking Group utilises two types of hedge accounting relationships:


Fair value hedge Cash flow hedge

Objective of this

hedging

arrangement

To hedge our exposure to changes to the fair value of a

recognised asset or liability or unrecognised firm

commitment caused by interest rate or foreign currency

movements.

To hedge our exposure to variability in cash flows of a

recognised asset or liability, a foreign exchange

component of a firm commitment or a highly probable

forecast transaction caused by interest rate, foreign

currency and other price movements.

Recognition of

effective hedge

portion

The following are recognised in profit or loss at the same

time:

• all changes in the fair value of the underlying item

relating to the hedged risk; and

• the change in the fair value of derivatives.

We recognise the effective portion of changes in the

fair value of derivatives designated as a cash flow

hedge in the cash flow hedge reserve.

Recognition of ineffective

hedge portion

Recognised immediately in other operating income.

If a hedging instrument

expires, or is sold,

terminated, or exercised;

or no longer qualifies for

hedge accounting

When we recognise the hedged item in profit or loss, we

recognise the related unamortised fair value adjustment

in profit or loss. This may occur over time if the hedged

item is amortised to profit or loss as part of the effective

yield over the period to maturity.

Only when we recognise the hedged item in profit or

loss is the amount previously deferred in the cash flow

hedge reserve transferred to profit or loss.

Hedged item sold or

repaid

We recognise the unamortised fair value adjustment

immediately in profit or loss.

Amounts accumulated in equity are transferred

immediately to profit or loss.

The fair value of derivative financial instruments designated in hedging relationships are:

Hedge Assets Liabilities Assets Liabilities

accounting 2018 2018 2017 2017

Fair value

type NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m

Interest rate swap agreements Fair value 54 (819) 86 (618)

Interest rate swap agreements Cash flow

286 (253)

302 (216)

Derivative financial instruments - designated in hedging relationships


340 (1,072)

388 (834)




19

ANZ BANK NEW ZEALAND LIMITED 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





20

9. DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (continued)

The impact recognised in profit or loss arising from derivative financial instruments designated in hedge accounting relationships, is as follows:

Hedge 2018 2017

accounting type NZ$m NZ$m

Gain/(loss) recognised in other operating income

Hedged item Fair value 212 153

Hedging instrument Fair Value (221) (159)








































Judgement is required when we select the valuation techniques used to measure the fair value of derivatives, particularly the selection

of valuation inputs that are not readily observable, and the application of valuation adjustments to certain derivatives. Refer to Note 16

Fair Value of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities for further details.





RECOGNITION AND MEASUREMENT

Recognition

Initially and at each reporting date, we recognise all derivatives at fair value. If the fair value of a derivative is:

positive, then we carry it as an asset, but if its value is negative, then we carry it as a liability.

Valuation adjustments are integral in determining the fair value of derivatives. This includes:

• a credit valuation adjustment (CVA) to reflect the counterparty risk and/or event of default; and

• a funding valuation adjustment (FVA) to account for funding costs and benefits in the derivatives portfolio.

Derecognition of

assets and liabilities

We remove derivative assets from our balance sheet when the contracts expire or we have transferred

substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership. We remove derivative liabilities from our balance sheet

when the Banking Group’s contractual obligations are discharged, cancelled or expired.

Impact on the

Income Statement

How we recognise gains or losses on derivative financial instruments depends on whether the derivative is

held for trading or is designated into a hedging relationship. For derivative financial instruments held for

trading, gains or losses from changes in the fair value are recognised in profit or loss.

For an instrument designated into a hedging relationship the recognition of gains or losses depends on the

nature of the item being hedged. Refer to the previous table on page 19 for profit or loss treatment depending

on the hedge type.

Hedge effectiveness

To qualify for hedge accounting a hedge is expected to be highly effective. A hedge is highly effective only if

the following conditions are met:

• the hedge is expected to be highly effective in achieving offsetting changes in fair value or cash flows

attributable to the hedged risk during the period for which the hedge is designated (prospective

effectiveness); and

• the actual results of the hedge are within the range of 80-125% (retrospective effectiveness).

The Banking Group monitors hedge effectiveness on a regular basis but at a minimum at least at each

reporting date.

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS






21

10. AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE ASSETS



2018 2017

Corporate Corporate

and financial and financial

Security Government institution Equity Government institution Equity

Period type securities securities securities Total securities securities securities Total

NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m

Less than 3 months

110 19 - 129

277 270 - 547

Between 3 and 12 months

616 162 - 778

695 158 - 853

Between 1 and 5 years 3,134 1,831 - 4,965 2,609 1,578 - 4,187

Greater than 5 years 458 171 - 629 657 115 - 772

No maturity - - 1 1 - - 1 1

Available-for-sale assets


4,318 2,183 1 6,502

4,238 2,121 1 6,360



































Judgement is required when we select valuation techniques used to measure the fair value of AFS assets not valued using quoted

market prices, particularly the selection of valuation inputs that are not readily observable. Refer to Note 16 Fair Value of Financial Assets

and Financial Liabilities for further details.





RECOGNITION AND MEASUREMENT

Available-for-sale (AFS) assets comprise non-derivative financial assets which we designate as AFS since we do not hold them principally for

trading purposes. They include both equity and debt securities. AFS assets are initially recognised at fair value plus transaction costs and are

revalued at least bi-annually. On revaluation, we include movements in fair value within the available-for-sale revaluation reserve in equity,

except for certain items which are recognised directly in profit or loss, being interest on debt securities, dividends received, foreign exchange on

debt securities and impairment charges.

When we sell the asset, any cumulative gain or loss from the available-for-sale revaluation reserve is recognised in profit or loss.

At each reporting date, we assess whether any AFS assets are impaired. We assess the impairment of any debt securities if an event has occurred

which will have a negative impact on the asset’s estimated cash flows. For equity securities, we assess if there is a significant or prolonged

decline in fair value below cost.

If an AFS asset is impaired, then we remove the cumulative loss related to that asset from the available-for-sale revaluation reserve. We then

recognise it in profit or loss for:

• debt instruments, as a credit impairment expense; and

• equity instruments, as a negative impact in other operating income.

We recognise any later reversals of impairment on debt securities in the profit or loss through the credit impairment charge line. However, we

do not make any reversals of impairment for equity securities. To the extent previously impaired equity securities recover in value, gains are

recognised directly in equity.


ANZ BANK NEW ZEALAND LIMITED 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


11. NET LOANS AND ADVANCES

The following table provides details of net loans and advances for the Banking Group:


2018 2017

Note NZ$m NZ$m

Overdrafts 905 1,040

Credit cards 1,644 1,638

Term loans - housing 78,395 72,524

Term loans - non-housing

44,169

44,227

Finance lease and hire purchase receivables

1,791

1,577

Subtotal 126,904

121,006

Unearned income

(239)

(222)

Capitalised brokerage/mortgage origination fees

313

334

Gross loans and advances (including assets reclassified as held for sale) 126,978 121,118

Provision for credit impairment 12 (512) (579)

Net loans and advances (including assets reclassified as held for sale)


126,466

120,539

Less: Net loans and advances reclassified as held for sale 25

-

(2,912)

Net loans and advances


126,466

117,627

Residual contractual maturity:


- within one year

26,896

23,799

- after more than one year

99,570

93,828

Net loans and advances 126,466 117,627


The Bank has sold residential mortgages to the NZ Branch with a net carrying value of NZ$2,210 million as at 30 September 2018 (2017: NZ$4,337

million). These assets qualify for derecognition as the Bank does not retain a continuing involvement in the transferred assets.





























RECOGNITION AND MEASUREMENT

Loans and advances are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market and are

facilities the Banking Group provides directly to customers or through third party channels.

Loans and advances are initially recognised at fair value plus transaction costs directly attributable to the issue of the loan or advance, which are

primarily brokerage/mortgage origination fees which we amortise over the estimated life of the loan. Subsequently, we then measure loans and

advances at amortised cost using the effective interest rate method, net of any provision for credit impairment.

We classify contracts to lease assets and hire purchase agreements as finance leases if they transfer substantially all the risks and rewards of

ownership of the asset to the customer or an unrelated third party.

The Banking Group enters into transactions in which it transfers financial assets that are recognised on its balance sheet. When the Banking

Group retains substantially all of the risks and rewards of the transferred assets, the transferred assets remain on the Banking Group’s balance

sheet, however if substantially all the risks and rewards are transferred, the Banking Group derecognises the asset.

If the risks and rewards are partially retained and control over the asset is lost, then the Banking Group derecognises the asset. If control over the

asset is not lost, the Banking Group continues to recognise the asset to the extent of its continuing involvement.

We separately recognise the rights and obligations retained, or created, in the transfer as assets and liabilities as appropriate.








22

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



12. PROVISION FOR CREDIT IMPAIRMENT

PROVISION FOR CREDIT IMPAIRMENT – BALANCE SHEET


Net loans and

advances

Off-balance sheet credit

related commitments Total


2018 2017 2018 2017 2018 2017

Provision for credit impairment NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m

Individual provision

Balance at start of year 152 151 - - 152 151

New and increased provisions

213

232

-

-

213

232

Write-backs

(83)

(95)

-

-

(83)

(95)

Bad debts written off (excluding recoveries)

(149)

(133)

-

-

(149)

(133)

Discount unwind

(3)

(3)

-

-

(3)

(3)

Total individual provision 130

152

-

-

130

152

Collective provision






Balance at start of year

343

367

84

104

427

471

Release to profit or loss

(32)

(24)

(13)

(20)

(45)

(44)

Total collective provision 311 343 71 84 382 427

Total provision for credit impairment 441 495 71 84 512 579


CREDIT IMPAIRMENT CHARGE – INCOME STATEMENT

2018 2017

Credit impairment charge NZ$m NZ$m

New and increased provisions

213

232

Write-backs

(83)

(95)

Recoveries of amounts previously written-off

(30)

(31)

Individual credit impairment charge

100

106

Collective credit impairment release

(45)

(44)

Total credit impairment charge 55

62




23

ANZ BANK NEW ZEALAND LIMITED 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





24

12. PROVISION FOR CREDIT IMPAIRMENT (continued)














































When we measure impairment of loans and advances, we use management’s judgement of the extent of losses at reporting date.

Individually Collectively

Key Judgements

•estimated future cash flows

•business prospects for the customer

•realisable value of any collateral

•the Banking Group’s position relative to other

claimants

•reliability of customer information

•likely cost and duration of recovering loans

•estimated future cash flows

•historical loss experience of assets with similar risk

characteristics

•impact of large concentrated losses inherent in the

portfolio

•assessment of the economic cycle

We regularly review our key judgements and update them to reflect actual loss experience.




RECOGNITION AND MEASUREMENT

The Banking Group recognises two types of impairment provisions for its loans and advances:

• individual provisions for significant assets that are assessed to be impaired; and

• collective provisions for portfolios of similar assets that are assessed collectively for impairment.

The accounting treatment for each of them is detailed below:

Individually Collectively

Assessment

If any impaired loans and advances exceed specified

thresholds and an impairment event has been

identified, then we assess the need for a provision

individually.

To allow for any small value loans and advances where

losses may have been incurred but not yet identified, and

individually significant loans and advances that we do not

assess as impaired, we assess them collectively in pools of

assets with similar risk characteristics.

Impairment

Loans and advances are assessed as impaired if we

have objective evidence that we may not recover

principal or interest payments (that is, a loss event

has been incurred).

We estimate the provision on the basis of historical loss

experience for assets with similar credit risk characteristics

to others in the respective collective pool. We adjust the

historical loss experience based on current observable

data – such as: changing economic conditions, the impact

of the inherent risk of large concentrated losses within the

portfolio and an assessment of the economic cycle.

Measurement

We measure impairment loss as the difference between the asset’s carrying amount and estimated future cash

flows discounted to their present value at the asset’s original effective interest rate. We record the result as an

expense in profit or loss in the period we identify the impairment and recognise a corresponding reduction in the

carrying amount of loans and advances through an offsetting provision.

Uncollectable

amounts

If a loan or advance is uncollectable (whether partially or in full), then we write off the balance (and also any re lated

provision for credit impairment).

We write off unsecured retail facilities at the earlier of the facility becoming 180 days past due, or the customer’s

bankruptcy or similar legal release from the obligation to repay the loan or advance. For secured facilities, write offs

occur net of the proceeds determined to be recoverable from the realisation of collateral.

Recoveries

If we recover any cash flows from loans and advances we have previously written off, then we recognise the

recovery in profit or loss in the period the cash flows are received.

Off-balance sheet

amounts

Any off-balance sheet items, such as loan commitments, are considered for impairment both on an individual and

collective basis.











NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



13. DEPOSITS AND OTHER BORROWINGS


2018 2017

Note NZ$m NZ$m

Term deposits 51,298 45,457

On demand and short term deposits 41,602 41,451

Deposits not bearing interest 10,224 8,882

UDC secured investments 17 931 1,039

Total customer deposits

104,055

96,829

Certificates of deposit

910

1,916

Commercial paper

2,486

3,721

Securities sold under repurchase agreements

517

157

Deposits from Immediate Parent Company and NZ Branch 26

40

73

Deposits and other borrowings (including liabilities reclassified as held for sale) 108,008 102,696

Less: Deposits and other borrowings reclassified as held for sale 25 - (1,039)

Deposits and other borrowings


108,008

101,657

Residual contractual maturity:




- to be settled within 1 year

103,492

97,301

- to be settled after 1 year

4,516

4,356

Deposits and other borrowings 108,008 101,657

Carried on Balance Sheet at:




Amortised cost

105,522

97,936

Fair value through profit or loss (designated on initial recognition)

2,486

3,721

Deposits and other borrowings


108,008

101,657











RECOGNITION AND MEASUREMENT

For deposits and other borrowings that:

• are not designated at fair value through profit or loss on initial recognition, we measure them at amortised cost and recognise their interest

expense using the effective interest rate method; and

• are managed on a fair value basis, reduce or eliminate an accounting mismatch or contain an embedded derivative, we designate them as

fair value through profit or loss.

Refer to Note 16 Fair Value of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities for details of the split between amortised cost and fair value.

For deposits and other borrowings designated at fair value we recognise th e amount of fair value gain or loss attributable to changes in the

Banking Group’s own credit risk in other comprehensive income in retained earnings. Any remaining amount of fair value gain or loss we

recognise directly in profit or loss. Once we have recognised an amount in other comprehensive income, we do not later reclassify it to profit or

loss.

Securities sold under repurchase agreements represent a liability to repurchase the financial assets that remain on our balance sheet since the

risks and rewards of ownership remain with

the Banking Group. Over the life of the repurchase agreement, we recognise the difference

between the sale price and the repurchase price and charge it to interest expense in the Income Statement.






25

ANZ BANK NEW ZEALAND LIMITED 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


14. DEBT ISSUANCES

The Banking Group uses a variety of funding programmes to issue unsubordinated debt (including senior debt and covered bonds) and subordinated

debt. The difference between unsubordinated debt and subordinated debt is that holders of unsubordinated debt take priority over holders of

subordinated debt owed by the relevant issuer and subordinated debt will be repaid by the relevant issuer only after the repayment of claims of

depositors, other creditors and the senior debt holders.


2018 2017


NZ$m NZ$m

Senior debt 18,767 16,008

Covered bonds 3,929 5,315

Total unsubordinated debt


22,696

21,323

Subordinated debt



- Additional Tier 1 capital

2,439

2,438

- Other

-

845

Total subordinated debt


2,439

3,283

Total debt issued 25,135 24,606

TOTAL DEBT ISSUED BY CURRENCY

The table below shows the Banking Group’s issued debt by currency of issue, which broadly represents the debt holders’ base location.


2018 2017


NZ$m NZ$m

AUD Australian Dollars 45 54

EUR Euro

6,740

6,676

JPY Japanese Yen

36

38

NZD New Zealand Dollars

6,654

7,147

CHF Swiss Francs

1,658

1,672

USD United States Dollars

10,002

9,019

Total debt issued 25,135

24,606

Residual contractual maturity:

- to be settled within 1 year 3,835 4,014

- to be settled after 1 year

21,300

20,592

Total debt issued 25,135

24,606

Covered bonds are guaranteed by ANZNZ Covered Bond Trust Limited (the Covered Bond Guarantor), solely in its capacity as trustee of ANZNZ

Covered Bond Trust (the Covered Bond Trust). The Covered Bond Trust is a member of the Banking Group, whereas the Covered Bond Guarantor is not

a member of the Banking Group.

NZX Regulation has granted the Bank a waiver from NZX Debt Market Listing Rule (Rule) 7.12.1 to the extent that this Rule requires the Bank to release

to the market details of any acquisition of the Bank’s domestic bonds as a result of its market-making activities or trading on behalf of its clients. The

Bank will notify the NZX if any such domestic bonds are subsequently cancelled. Rule 7.12.1 does not extend to the Bank’s subsidiaries in this context.

The Bank will continue to comply with Rule 7.12.1 in respect of any domestic bonds that are issued, redeemed or purchased by the Bank in any other

capacity.

Senior debt includes a series of bonds quoted on the NZX Debt Market that matures on 22 March 2019 (the Bonds). NZX Regulation has granted the

Bank a waiver from the requirement in Rule 5.2.3 (as modified by NZX Regulation’s Ruling on Rule 5.2.3 issued on 29 September 2015) for the Bonds to

be held by at least 100 members of the public holding at least 25% of the Bonds issued (Spread). The effect of this waiver is that the Bonds may not be

widely held and there may be reduced liquidity in the Bonds. If there is a material reduction in the Spread of the Bonds, the Bank will notify NZX as

appropriate.

SUBORDINATED DEBT

Certain subordinated debt qualifies as regulatory capital for the Banking Group and is classified as Additional Tier 1 (AT1) capital for RBNZ’s capital

adequacy purposes depending on their term and conditions:

• AT1 Capital: perpetual capital instruments such as:

• ANZ NZ Capital Notes (ANZ NZ CN);

• ANZ NZ Internal Capital Notes 1 (ANZ NZ ICN); and

• ANZ NZ Internal Capital Notes 2 (ANZ NZ ICN2).




26

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



14. DEBT ISSUANCES (continued)

AT1 Capital

AT1 capital notes are fully paid convertible non-cumulative perpetual subordinated notes. The AT1 capital notes rank equally with each other and with

the Bank’s preference shares. Holders of AT1 capital notes do not have any right to vote in general meetings of the Bank.

As at 30 September 2018, ANZ NZ CN carried a BB+ credit rating from S&P Global Ratings.

AT1 capital notes are classified as debt given there are circumstances beyond the Bank’s control where the principal is converted into a variable

number of ordinary shares of the Bank (ANZ NZ ICN and ANZ NZ ICN2) or the Ultimate Parent Bank (ANZ NZ CN).

Interest payments on the AT1 capital notes are non-cumulative and subject to the issuer’s absolute discretion and certain payment conditions

(including regulatory requirements).

Where specified, AT1 capital notes provide the Bank with an early redemption or conversion option on a specified date and in certain other

circumstances (such as a tax or regulatory event). This option is subject to RBNZ’s and, in respect of the ANZ NZ CN, APRA’s prior written approval.


Each of the AT1 capital notes will immediately convert into a variable number of ordinary shares of the:

• Bank based on the net assets per share in the Bank’s most recently published Disclosure Statement (ANZ NZ ICN and ANZ NZ ICN2); or

• Ultimate Parent Bank based on the average market price of the Ultimate Parent Bank’s ordinary shares immediately prior to conversion less a 1%

discount, subject to a maximum conversion number (ANZ NZ CN)

if:

• the Banking Group’s, or in the case of the ANZ NZ CN the Overseas Banking Group’s Level 2, common equity tier 1 capital ratio is equal to or less

than 5.125% - known as a Common Equity Capital Trigger Event; or

• RBNZ directs the Bank to convert or write-off the notes or a statutory manager is appointed to the Bank and decides that the Bank must convert

or write-off the notes or, in the case of the ANZ NZ CN, APRA notifies the Ultimate Parent Bank that, without the conversion or write-off of certain

securities or a public injection of capital (or equivalent support), it considers that the Ultimate Parent Bank would become non-viable – known

as a Non-Viability Trigger Event.


Where specified, AT1 capital notes mandatorily convert into a variable number of ordinary shares of the Bank (ANZ NZ ICN and ANZ NZ ICN2) (based

on the net assets per share in the Bank’s most recently published Disclosure Statement) or the Ultimate Parent Bank (ANZ NZ CN) (based on the

average market value of the shares immediately prior to conversion less a 1% discount):

• on a specified mandatory conversion date; or

• on an earlier date under certain circumstances as set out in the terms.

However, the mandatory conversion is deferred for a specified period if certain conversion tests are not met.

The table below show the key details of the AT1 capital notes on issue at 30 September in both the current and the prior year:

ANZ NZ CN ANZ NZ ICN ANZ NZ ICN2

Issuer The Bank The Bank The Bank

Issue date 31 March 2015 5 March 2015 15 June 2016

Issue amount NZ$500 million NZ$1,003 million NZ$938 million

Face value NZ$1 NZ$100 NZ$100

Interest frequency Quarterly in arrears Semi-annually in arrears Semi-annually in arrears

Interest rate

Fixed at 7.2% p.a. until 25

May 2020. Resets in May

2020 to a floating rate: (New

Zealand 3 month Bank bill

rate + 3.5%)

Floating rate: (New Zealand

6 month Bank Bill rate +

3.8%)

Floating rate: (New Zealand

6 month Bank Bill rate +

6.29%)

Issuer's early redemption or conversion option 25 May 2020 24 March 2023

15 June 2026 and each 5th

anniversary

Mandatory conversion date 25 May 2022 24 March 2025 n/a

Common equity capital trigger event Yes Yes Yes

Non-viability trigger event Yes Yes Yes

Carrying value as at 30 September 2018 (net of issue costs) NZ$498 million NZ$1,003 million NZ$938 million










RECOGNITION AND MEASUREMENT

Debt issuances are measured at amortised cost. Where the Banking Group enters into a hedge accounting relationship, the fair value

attributable to the hedge risk is reflected in adjustments to the carrying value of the debt. Interest expense is recognised using the effective

interest rate method.

Subordinated debt with capital-based conversion features (i.e. Common Equity Capital Trigger Event or Non-Viability Trigger Events) are

considered to contain embedded derivatives that we account for separately at fair value through profit and loss. The embedded derivatives arise

because the amount of shares issued on conversion following any of those trigger events is subject to the maximum conversion number,

however they have no value as of the reporting date given the remote nature of those triggering events.






27

ANZ BANK NEW ZEALAND LIMITED 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


15. FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT

RISK MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK AND MODEL

INTRODUCTION

The use of financial instruments is fundamental to the Banking Group’s businesses of providing banking and other financial services to our customers.

The associated financial risks (primarily credit, market, and liquidity risks) are a significant portion of the Banking Group’s principal risks.

This note details the Banking Group’s financial risk management policies, processes and quantitative disclosures in relation to the key financial risks:

Principal financial risks Key sections applicable to this risk

Overview

• An overview of our Risk Management Framework

Credit risk

Credit risk is the risk of financial loss from a customer, or counterparty,

failing to meet their financial obligations – including the whole and

timely payment of principal, interest, collateral, and other receivables.

• Credit risk overview, management and control responsibilities

• Maximum exposure to credit risk

• Credit quality

• Concentrations of credit risk

• Collateral management

Market risk

Market risk is the risk of loss arising from potential adverse changes in

the value of the Banking Group’s assets and liabilities and other trading

positions from fluctuations in market variables. These variables include,

but are not limited to interest rates, foreign exchange, equity prices,

commodity prices, credit spreads, implied volatilities, and asset

correlations.

• Market risk overview, management and control responsibilities

• Measurement of market risk

• Traded and non-traded market risk

• Foreign currency risk – structural exposure

Liquidity and funding risk

Liquidity risk is the risk that the Banking Group is unable to meet its

payment obligations when they fall due; or does not have the

appropriate amount, tenor and composition of funding and liquidity to

fund increases in its assets.

• Liquidity risk overview, management and control responsibilities

• Key areas of measurement for liquidity risk

• Liquidity portfolio management

• Funding position

• Residual contractual maturity analysis of the Banking Group’s liabilities

OVERVIEW

AN OVERVIEW OF OUR RISK MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK

This overview is provided to aid the users of the financial statements to understand the context of the financial disclosures required under NZ IFRS 7

Financial Instruments: Disclosures.

The Board is responsible for establishing and overseeing the Banking Group’s Risk Management Framework (RMF). The Board has delegated authority

to the Bank’s Board Risk Committee (BRC) to develop and monitor compliance with the Banking Group’s financial risk management policies. The BRC

reports regularly to the Board on its activities.

The Board approves the strategic objectives of the Banking Group including:

• the Risk Appetite Statement (RAS), which sets out the Board’s expectations regarding the degree of risk that the Banking Group is prepared to

accept in pursuit of its strategic objectives and business plan; and

• the Risk Management Strategy (RMS), which describes the Banking Group’s strategy for managing risks and the key elements of the RMF that

gives effect to this strategy. This includes a description of each material risk, and an overview of how the RMF addresses each risk, with reference

to the relevant policies, standards and procedures. It also includes information on how the Banking Group identifies measures, evaluates,

monitors, reports and controls or mitigates material risks.

The Banking Group, through its training and management standards and procedures, aims to maintain a disciplined and robust control environment

in which all employees understand their roles and obligations. At the Banking Group, risk is everyone’s responsibility.

The Banking Group has an independent risk management function, headed by the Chief Risk Officer who:

• is responsible for overseeing the risk profile and the ri sk management framework;

• can effectively challenge activities and decisions that materially affect the Banking Group’s risk profile; and

• has an independent reporting line to the BRC to enable the appropriate escalation of issues of concern.

The Internal Audit Function reports directly to the Bank’s Board Audit Committee (BAC). Internal Audit provides:

• an independent evaluation of the Banking Group’s RMF annually and undertakes a comprehensive review every three years;

• assurance on the appropriateness, effectiveness and adequacy of the risk management framework, which includes assurance the framework is

operating effectively; and

• recommendations to improve the framework and/or work practices to strengthen the effectiveness of day to day operations.




28

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



15. FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT (continued)

CREDIT RISK

CREDIT RISK OVERVIEW, MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL RESPONSIBILITIES

Granting credit facilities to customers is one of the Banking Group’s major sources of income. As this activity is also a principal risk, the Banking Group

dedicates considerable resources to its management. The Banking Group assumes credit risk in a wide range of lending and other activities in diverse

markets and in many jurisdictions. Credit risks arise from traditional lending to customers as well as from inter-bank, treasury, trade finance and capital

markets activities around the world.

Our credit risk management framework ensures we apply a consistent approach across the Banking Group when we measure, monitor and manage

the credit risk appetite set by the Board. The Board is assisted and advised by the BRC in discharging its duty to oversee credit risk. The BRC:

• sets the credit risk appetite and credit strategies; and

• approves credit transactions beyond the discretion of executive management.

We quantify credit risk through an internal credit rating system (masterscales) to ensure consistency across exposure types and to provide a consistent

framework for reporting and analysis. The system uses models and other tools to measure the following for customer exposures:

Probability of Default (PD) Expressed by a Customer Credit Rating (CCR), reflecting the Banking Group’s assessment of a customer’s

ability to service and repay debt.

Exposure at Default (EAD) The expected amount of loan outstanding at the time of default.

Loss Given Default (LGD) Expressed by a Security Indicator (SI) ranging from A to G. The SI is calculated by reference to the

percentage of loan covered by security which the Banking Group can realise if a customer defaults. The

A-G scale is supplemented by a range of other SIs which cover such factors as cash cover and sovereign

backing. For retail and some small business lending, we group exposures into large homogenous pools

– and the LGD is assigned at the pool level.

Our specialist credit risk teams develop and validate the Banking Group’s PD and LGD rating models. The outputs from these models drive our day-to-

day credit risk management decisions including origination, pricing, approval levels, regulatory capital adequacy, economic capital allocation, and

credit provisioning.

All customers with whom the Banking Group has a credit relationship are assigned a CCR at origination via either of the following assessment

approaches:

Large and more complex lending Retail and some small business lending

Rating models provide a consistent and structured assessment, with

judgement required around the use of out-of-model factors. We

handle credit approval on a dual approval basis, jointly with the

business writer and an independent credit officer.

Automated assessment of credit applications using a combination of

scoring (application and behavioural), policy rules and external credit

reporting information. If the application does not meet the automated

assessment criteria, then it is referred out for manual assessment.

We use the Banking Group’s internal CCRs to manage the credit quality of financial assets neither past due nor impaired. To enable wider comparisons,

the Banking Group’s CCRs are mapped to external rating agency scales as follows:

Internal Rating The Banking Group Customer Requirements Moody’s Rating S&P Global Ratings

Strong credit profile Demonstrated superior stability in their operating and financial

performance over the long-term, and whose earnings capacity is not

significantly vulnerable to foreseeable events.

Aaa – Baa3 AAA – BBB-

Satisfactory risk Demonstrated sound operational and financial stability over the

medium to long-term — even though some may be susceptible to

cyclical trends or variability in earnings.

Ba1 – B1 BB+ – B+

Sub-standard but not

past due nor impaired

Demonstrated some operational and financial instability, with

variability and uncertainty in profitability and liquidity projected to

continue over the short and possibly medium term.

B2 – Caa B - CCC






29

ANZ BANK NEW ZEALAND LIMITED 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


15. FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT (continued)

MAXIMUM EXPOSURE TO CREDIT RISK

For financial assets recognised on the balance sheet, the maximum exposure to credit risk is the carrying amount. In certain circumstances there may

be differences between the carrying amounts reported on the balance sheet and the amounts reported in the tables below. Principally, these

differences arise in respect of financial assets that are subject to risks other than credit risk, such as equity instruments which are primarily subject to

market risk, or bank notes and coins.

For undrawn facilities, this maximum exposure to credit risk is the full amount of the committed facilities. For contingent exposures, the maximum

exposure to credit risk is the maximum amount the Banking Group would have to pay if the instrument is called upon.

For the purpose of this note, assets presented as assets held for sale in the Balance Sheet have been reallocated to their respective Balance Sheet

categories.

The table below shows our maximum exposure to credit risk of on-balance sheet and off-balance sheet positions before taking account of any

collateral held or other credit enhancements.


Reported Excluded

1

/ Other

2


Maximum exposure to

credit risk



2018 2017 2018 2017 2018 2017


NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m

On-balance sheet positions






Net loans and advances

2,3


126,466

120,539

(71)

(84)

126,537

120,623

Other financial assets:

Cash and cash equivalents 2,200 2,338 204 198 1,996 2,140

Settlement balances owed to the Banking Group

656

536

-

-

656

536

Collateral paid

1,919

1,415

-

-

1,919

1,415

Trading securities

8,024

7,663

-

-

8,024

7,663

Derivative financial instruments

8,086

9,878

-

-

8,086

9,878

Available-for-sale assets

6,502

6,360

-

-

6,502

6,360

Other financial assets

4


719

744

-

-

719

744

Total other financial assets 28,106 28,934 204 198 27,902 28,736

Subtotal 154,572 149,473 133 114 154,439 149,359

Off-balance sheet positions






Undrawn and contingent facilities

2,5


30,105

29,377

71

84

30,034

29,293

Total 184,677

178,850

204

198

184,473

178,652

1 Excluded comprises bank notes and coins and cash at bank within cash and cash equivalents.

2 Other relates to the transfer of individual and collective provisions related to off-balance sheet facilities held in net loans and advances. The provisions are transferred for the purposes of

showing the maximum exposure to credit risk by relevant facility type in this and the following tables.

3 Including items reclassified as held for sale.

4 Other financial assets mainly comprise accrued interest, insurance receivables and acceptances.

5 Undrawn facilities and contingent facilities include guarantees, letters of credit and performance related contingencies.




30

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



15. FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT (continued)

CREDIT QUALITY

The table below provides an analysis of the credit quality of the maximum exposure to credit risk split by:

• neither past due nor impaired financial assets by credit quality;

• past due but not impaired assets by ageing; and

• impaired assets presented as gross amounts and net of provision for credit impairment.


Loans

and advances

Other financial

assets

Off-balance sheet

credit related

commitments Total


2018 2017 2018 2017 2018 2017 2018 2017


NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m

Neither past due nor impaired

Strong credit profile 92,783 81,595 27,368 28,024 23,475 22,922 143,626 132,541

Satisfactory risk

29,335

34,283

521

702

6,186

6,016

36,042

41,001

Sub-standard but not past due or impaired 2,296 2,558 13 10 359 349 2,668 2,917

Subtotal 124,414

118,436

27,902

28,736

30,020

29,287

182,336

176,459

Past due but not impaired








≥ 1 < 30 days 1,420 1,385 - - - - 1,420 1,385

≥ 30 < 60 days

179

290

-

-

-

-

179

290

≥ 60 < 90 days

128

125

-

-

-

-

128

125

≥ 90 days 205 182 - - - - 205 182

Subtotal 1,932

1,982

-

-

-

-

1,932

1,982

Impaired

Impaired loans

321

357

-

-

-

-

321

357

Non-performing commitments

and contingencies

-

-

-

-

14

6

14

6

Gross impaired financial assets 321 357 - - 14 6 335 363

Individual provisions

(130)

(152)

-

-

-

-

(130)

(152)

Subtotal net impaired 191 205 - - 14 6 205 211

Total 126,537

120,623

27,902

28,736

30,034

29,293

184,473

178,652




31

ANZ BANK NEW ZEALAND LIMITED 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


15. FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT (continued)

CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT RISK

Credit risk becomes concentrated when a number of customers are engaged in similar activities, have similar economic characteristics, or have similar

activities within the same geographic region – therefore, they may be similarly affected by changes in economic or other conditions. The Banking

Group monitors its credit portfolio to manage risk concentration and rebalance the portfolio. The Banking Group also applies single customer

counterparty limits to protect against unacceptably large exposures to one single customer.

Analysis of financial assets by industry sector is based on Australian and New Zealand Standard Industrial Classification (ANZSIC) codes. The significant

categories shown are the level one New Zealand Standard Industry Output Categories (NZSIOC), except that Agriculture is shown separately as

required by the Order.


Composition of financial instruments that give rise to credit risk by industry group are presented below:


Loans

and advances

3,4


Other financial

assets

4


Off-balance sheet

credit related

commitments

5

Total

2018 2017 2018 2017 2018 2017 2018 2017

NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m

New Zealand residents

Agriculture 17,844 17,686 82 83 1,373 1,436 19,299 19,205

Forestry and fishing, agriculture services 1,379 1,277 9 5 249 240 1,637 1,522

Manufacturing 2,687 2,729 284 169 1,793 1,798 4,764 4,696

Electricity, gas, water and waste services

1,403

1,602

330

457

1,576

1,522

3,309

3,581

Construction

1,713

1,635

21

18

1,358

1,119

3,092

2,772

Wholesale trade

1,404

1,630

63

54

1,521

1,357

2,988

3,041

Retail trade and accommodation

3,211

3,058

27

28

969

1,133

4,207

4,219

Transport, postal and warehousing

1,222

1,440

121

69

783

894

2,126

2,403

Finance and insurance services

872

903

5,509

5,268

1,567

1,259

7,948

7,430

Public administration and safety

1


364

412

9,654

8,099

1,043

794

11,061

9,305

Rental, hiring & real estate services

31,805

30,697

235

218

3,461

3,699

35,501

34,614

Professional, scientific, technical,

administrative and support services

1,165 1,267 9 10 633 619 1,807 1,896

Households

56,808

51,554

192

180

11,977

11,878

68,977

63,612

All other New Zealand residents

2


2,569

2,625

167

253

1,663

1,474

4,399

4,352

Subtotal 124,446 118,515 16,703 14,911 29,966 29,222 171,115 162,648

Overseas


Finance and insurance services

128

123

11,109

13,126

139

155

11,376

13,404

Households 1,512 1,454 5 5 - - 1,517 1,459

All other non-NZ residents 818 914 85 694 - - 903 1,608

Subtotal

2,458

2,491

11,199

13,825

139

155

13,796

16,471

Gross subtotal 126,904

121,006

27,902

28,736

30,105

29,377

184,911

179,119

Provision for credit impairment (441) (495) - - (71) (84) (512) (579)

Subtotal 126,463 120,511 27,902 28,736 30,034 29,293 184,399 178,540

Unearned income (239) (222) - - - - (239) (222)

Capitalised brokerage / mortgage

origination fees

313

334

-

-

-

-

313

334

Maximum exposure to credit risk 126,537

120,623

27,902

28,736

30,034

29,293

184,473

178,652

1

Public administration and safety includes exposures to local government administration and central government administration, defence and public safety.

2

Other includes exposures to mining, information media and telecommunications, education and training, health care and social assistance and arts, recreation and other services.

3

Excludes individual and collective provisions for credit impairment held in respect of credit related commitments.

4

Including items classified as held for sale.

5

Credit related commitments comprise undrawn facilities, customer contingent liabilities and letters of offer.





32

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



15. FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT (continued)

COLLATERAL MANAGEMENT

We use collateral for on and off-balance sheet exposures to mitigate credit risk if a counterparty cannot meet its repayment obligations from its

expected cashflows. For some products, the collateral provided by customers is fundamental to the product’s structuring, so it is not strictly the

secondary source of repayment - for example, lending secured by trade receivables is typically repaid by the collection of those receivables.

The nature of collateral or security held for the relevant classes of financial assets is as follows:

Net loans and advances


Loans – housing and personal Housing loans are secured by mortgage(s) over property and additional security may take the form of

guarantees and deposits.

Personal lending (including credit cards and overdrafts) is predominantly unsecured. If we take

security, then it is restricted to eligible vehicles, motor homes and other assets.

Loans – business Business loans may be secured, partially secured or unsecured. Typically, we take security by way of a

mortgage over property and/or a charge over the business or other assets.

If appropriate, we may take other security to mitigate the credit risk, for example: guarantees, standby

letters of credit or derivative protection.

Other financial assets


Trading securities, Available-for-sale

assets, Derivatives and Other financial

assets

For trading securities, we do not seek collateral directly from the issuer or counterparty. However, the

collateral may be implicit in the terms of the instrument (for example, with an asset-backed security).

The terms of debt securities may include collateralisation.

For derivatives, we typically terminate all contracts with the counterparty and settle on a net basis at

market levels current at the time of a counterparty default under International Swaps and Derivatives

Association (ISDA) Master Agreements.

Our preferred practice is to use a Credit Support Annex (CSA) to the ISDA so that open derivative

positions with the counterparty are aggregated and cash collateral (or other forms of eligible collateral)

is exchanged daily. The collateral is provided by the counterparty when their position is out of the

money (or provided to the counterparty by the Banking Group when our position is out of the money).

Off-balance sheet positions


Undrawn and contingent liabilities Collateral for off balance sheet positions is mainly held against undrawn facilities, and they are typically

performance bonds on guarantees. Undrawn facilities that are secured include housing loans secured

by mortgages over residential property and business lending secured by commercial real estate and/or

charges over business assets.

The table below shows the estimated value of collateral we hold and the net unsecured portion of credit exposures:


Credit exposure Total value of collateral

Unsecured portion of

credit exposure

2018 2017 2018 2017 2018 2017

NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m

Net loans and advances

1

126,537 120,623 117,337 110,914 9,200 9,709

Other financial assets

1


27,902

28,736

2,029

1,617

25,873

27,119

Off-balance sheet positions

30,034

29,293

15,124

14,526

14,910

14,767

Total 184,473

178,652

134,490

127,057

49,983

51,595

1

Including items reclassified as held for sale.




33

ANZ BANK NEW ZEALAND LIMITED 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


15. FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT (continued)

MARKET RISK

MARKET RISK OVERVIEW, MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL RESPONSIBILITIES

Market risk stems from the Banking Group’s trading and balance sheet management activities, the impact of changes and correlation between interest

rates, foreign exchange rates, credit spreads and volatility in bond, commodity or equity prices.

The BRC delegates responsibility for day-to-day management of both market risks and compliance with market risk policies to the Bank’s Asset &

Liability Committee (ALCO).

Within overall strategies and policies established by the BRC, business units and risk management have joint responsibility for the control of market

risk at the Banking Group level. The Market Risk team (a specialist risk management unit independent of the business) allocates market risk limits at

various levels and monitors and reports on them daily. This detailed framework allocates individual limits to manage and control exposures using risk

factors and profit and loss limits.

Management, measurement and reporting of market risk is undertaken in two broad categories:

Traded Market Risk Non-Traded Market Risk

Risk of loss from changes in the value of financial instruments due

to movements in price factors for both physical and derivative

trading positions. Principal risk categories monitored are:

1. Currency risk – potential loss arising from changes in foreign

exchange rates or their implied volatilities.

2. Interest rate risk – potential loss from changes in market

interest rates or their implied volatilities.

3. Credit spread risk – potential loss arising from a movement in

margin or spread relative to a benchmark.

4. Commodity risk – potential loss arising from changes in

commodity prices or their implied volatilities.

5. Equity risk – potential loss arising from changes in equity

prices.

Risk of loss associated with the management of non-traded interest rate risk,

liquidity risk and foreign exchange exposures. This includes interest rate risk

in the banking book. This risk of loss arises from adverse changes in the

overall and relative level of interest rates for different tenors, differences in

the actual versus expected net interest margin, and the potential valuation

risk associated with embedded options in financial instruments and bank

products.


MEASUREMENT OF MARKET RISK

We primarily manage and control market risk using Value at Risk (VaR), sensitivity analysis and stress testing.

VaR gauges the Banking Group’s possible daily loss based on historical market movements.

The Banking Group’s VaR approach for both traded and non-traded risk is historical simulation. We use historical changes in market rates, prices and

volatilities over:

• the previous 500 business days, to calculate standard VaR, and

• a 1-year stressed period, to calculate stressed VaR.

We calculate traded and non-traded VaR using one-day and ten-day holding periods. For stressed VaR, we use a ten-day period. Back testing is used to

ensure our VaR models remain accurate.

The Banking Group measures VaR at a 99% confidence interval which means there is a 99% chance that a loss will not exceed the VaR on any given

day.




34

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



15. FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT (continued)

TRADED AND NON-TRADED MARKET RISK

Traded market risk

The table below shows the traded market risk VaR on a diversified basis by risk categories:


30 September 2018 30 September 2017

High for Low for Average High for Low for Average

As at year year for year As at year year for year

NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m

Traded value at risk 99% confidence


Foreign exchange risk

0.5 1.6 0.2 0.7

0.1 1.2 0.1 0.4

Interest rate risk

1.4 3.6 0.8 1.9

3.0 5.8 1.3 2.5

Credit spread risk

0.5 0.8 0.3 0.5

0.6 0.8 0.4 0.6

Diversification benefit

1

(1.0) n/a n/a (0.9) (0.9) n/a n/a (0.9)

Total VaR 1.4 4.0 1.0 2.2 2.8 5.3 1.4 2.6

1.

The diversification benefit reflects risks that offset across categories. The high and low VaR figures reported for each factor did not necessarily occur on the same day as the high and low VaR reported for

the Banking Group as a whole. Consequently, a diversification benefit for high and low would not be meani ngful and is therefore omitted from the table.

Non-traded market risk

Balance sheet risk management

The principal objectives of balance sheet risk management are to maintain acceptable levels of interest rate and liquidity risk to mitigate the negative

impact of movements in interest rates on the earnings and market value of the Banking Group’s banking book, while ensuring the Banking Group

maintains sufficient liquidity to meet its obligations as they fall due.

Interest rate risk management

Non-traded interest rate risk relates to the potential adverse impact of changes in market interest rates on the Banking Group’s future net interest

income. This risk arises from two principal sources, namely mismatches between the repricing dates of interest bearing assets and liabilities; and the

investment of capital and other non-interest bearing liabilities in interest bearing assets. Interest rate risk is reported using VaR and scenario analysis

(based on the impact of a 1% rate shock). The table below shows VaR figures for non-traded interest rate risk for the Banking Group.


30 September 2018 30 September 2017

As at

High for

year

Low for

year

Average

for year As at

High for

year

Low for

year

Average

for year

NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m

Non-traded value at risk 99% confidence

Total VaR

8.0 10.2 6.4 7.8

8.3 10.2 7.3 8.2

We undertake scenario analysis to stress test the impact of extreme events on the Banking Group’s market risk exposures. We model a 1% overnight

parallel positive shift in the yield curve to determine the potential impact on our net interest income over the next 12 months. This is a standard risk

measure which assumes the parallel shift is reflected in all wholesale and customer rates.

The table below shows the outcome of this risk measure for the current and previous financial years, expressed as a percentage of reported net

interest income. A positive number signifies that a rate increase is positive for net interest income over the next 12 months.


2018 2017

Impact of 1% rate shock

As at period end

-0.4%

0.6%

Maximum exposure

0.9%

0.9%

Minimum exposure

-1.2%

-0.3%

Average exposure (in absolute terms) 0.0%

0.4%

FOREIGN CURRENCY RISK – STRUCTURAL EXPOSURES

Where it is considered appropriate, the Banking Group takes out economic hedges against larger foreign exchange denominated revenue streams

(primarily Australian Dollar, US Dollar and US Dollar correlated). The primary objective of hedging is to ensure that, if practical, the consolidated capital

ratios are neutral to the effect of changes in exchange rates. During the current and prior years, we had selective hedges in place. Further detail on the

Banking Group’s hedging relationships is disclosed in Note 9 Derivative Financial Instruments.




35

ANZ BANK NEW ZEALAND LIMITED 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


15. FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT (continued)

LIQUIDITY AND FUNDING RISK

LIQUIDITY RISK OVERVIEW, MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL RESPONSIBILITIES

Liquidity risk is the risk that the Banking Group is either:

• unable to meet its payment obligations (including repaying depositors or maturing wholesale debt) when they fall due; or

• does not have the appropriate amount, tenor and composition of funding and liquidity to support its assets.

Management of liquidity and funding is overseen by ALCO. The Banking Group’s liquidity and funding risks are governed by a set of principles

approved by the Risk Committees of the Bank’s and Ultimate Parent Bank’s Boards and include:

• maintaining the ability to meet all payment obligations in the immediate term;

• ensuring that the Banking Group has the ability to meet ‘survival horizons’ under Banking Group specific and general market liquidity stress

scenarios to meet cash flow obligations over the short to medium term;

• maintaining strength in the Banking Group’s balance sheet structure to ensure long term resilience in the liquidity and funding risk profile;

• ensuring the liquidity management framework is compatible with local regulatory requirements;

• preparing daily liquidity reports and scenario analysis to quantify the Banking Group’s positions;

• targeting a diversified funding base to avoid undue concentrations by investor type, maturity, market source and currency;

• holding a portfolio of high quality liquid assets to protect against adverse funding conditions and to support day-to-day operations; and

• establishing a detailed contingency plan to cover different liquidity crisis events.

KEY AREAS OF MEASUREMENT FOR LIQUIDITY RISK

Supervision and regulation

RBNZ requires the Bank to have a comprehensive Board approved liquidity strategy defining: policy, systems and procedures for measuring, assessing,

reporting and managing liquidity. This also includes a formal contingency plan for dealing with a liquidity crisis. The Banking Group is required to meet

one week and one month liquidity mismatch ratios and a one year core funding ratio each day.

Scenario modelling

A key component of the Banking Group’s liquidity management framework is scenario modelling.

Potential severe liquidity crisis scenarios which model the behaviour of cash flows where there is a problem (real or perceived) may include, but are

not limited to, operational issues, doubts about the solvency of the Banking Group, or adverse rating changes. Under these scenarios the Banking

Group may have significant difficulty rolling over or replacing funding. The Banking Group’s liquidity policy requires sufficient high quality liquid assets

to be held to meet its liquidity needs for the following 30 calendar days under the modelled scenarios.

As of 30 September 2018 the Banking Group was in compliance with the above scenarios.

Structural balance sheet metrics

The Banking Group’s liquidity management framework also encompasses structural balance sheet metrics such as the RBNZ core funding ratio. These

metrics are designed to limit the amount of funding required to be rolled over within a 1 year timeframe and so interact with the liquidity scenarios to

maintain the Banking Group‘s liquidity position.

Wholesale funding

The Banking Group’s wholesale funding strategy is designed to deliver a sustainable portfolio of wholesale funds that balances cost efficiency while

targeting diversification by markets, investors, currencies, maturities and funding structures. Short-term wholesale funding requirements, with a

contractual maturity of less than one year, are managed through Treasury and Markets operations. Long-term wholesale funding is managed and

executed through Treasury operations.

The Banking Group also uses maturity concentration limits under the wholesale funding and liquidity management framework. Maturity

concentration limits ensure that the Banking Group is not required to issue large volumes of new wholesale funding within a short time period to

replace maturing wholesale funding. Funding instruments used to meet the wholesale borrowing requirement must be on a pre-established list of

approved products.

Funding capacity and debt issuance planning

The Banking Group adopts a conservative approach to determine its funding capacity. Annually, a funding plan is approved by the Bank’s Board. The

plan is supplemented by regular updates and is linked to the Banking Group’s three year strategic planning cycle.




36

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



15. FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT (continued)

LIQUIDITY PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT

The Banking Group holds a diversified portfolio of cash and high quality highly liquid securities to support liquidity risk management. The size of the

Banking Group’s liquidity portfolio is based on the amount required to meet the requirements of its internal and regulatory liquidity scenario metrics.

Total liquidity portfolio


2018 2017

NZ$m NZ$m

Cash and balances with central banks

2,026

2,102

Certificates of deposit

179

59

Central and local government bonds 7,528 6,609

Government treasury bills

794

775

Reserve Bank bills 50 -

Other bonds

5,493

6,390

Total liquidity portfolio 16,070

15,935


Assets held for managing liquidity risk include short term cash held with RBNZ, New Zealand Government securities, securities issued by supranational

agencies, securities issued by highly rated banks and securities issued by State Owned Enterprises, Local Authorities and highly rated NZ domestic

corporates. These assets would be accepted as collateral by RBNZ in repurchase transactions. At 30 September 2018 the Banking Group would be

eligible to enter into repurchase transactions with a value of NZ$14,044 million. The Banking Group also held unencumbered internal residential

mortgage backed securities (RMBS) which would entitle the Banking Group to enter into repurchase transactions with a value of NZ$7,060 million at

30 September 2018.

Liquidity crisis contingency planning

The Banking Group maintains a liquidity crisis contingency plan to define an approach for analysing and responding to a liquidity-threatening event

on a group wide basis. The framework includes:

• the establishment of crisis severity/stress levels;

• clearly assigned crisis roles and responsibilities;

• early warning signals indicative of an approaching crisis, and mechanisms to monitor and report these signals;

• outlined action plans, and courses of action for altering asset and liability behaviour;

• procedures for crisis management reporting, and covering cash-flow shortfalls; and

• assigned responsibilities for internal and external communications.




37

ANZ BANK NEW ZEALAND LIMITED 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


15. FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT (continued)

FUNDING POSITION

The Banking Group actively uses balance sheet disciplines to prudently manage the funding mix. The Banking Group employs funding metrics to

ensure that an appropriate proportion of its assets are funded from stable sources, including customer liabilities, longer-dated wholesale debt (with

remaining term exceeding one year) and equity.

Analysis of funding liabilities by industry is based on ANZSIC codes. The significant categories shown are the level one New Zealand Standard Industry

Output Categories (NZSIOC).


2018 2017

Note NZ$m NZ$m

Funding composition




Customer deposits

1

13

104,055

96,829

Wholesale funding



Debt issuances

25,135

24,606

Certificates of deposit and commercial paper 3,396 5,637

Other borrowings

557

230

Total wholesale funding

29,088

30,473

Total funding


133,143

127,302

Customer deposits by industry - New Zealand residents




Agriculture, forestry and fishing 3,763 3,487

Manufacturing

2,335

2,024

Construction

2,050

1,851

Wholesale trade 1,571 1,433

Retail trade and accommodation

1,484

1,516

Financial and insurance services 10,661 8,996

Rental, hiring and real estate services

2,878

2,596

Professional, scientific, technical, administrative and support services

5,126

5,034

Public administration and safety 1,572 1,261

Arts, recreation and other services

2,027

1,928

Households

56,640

53,222

All other New Zealand residents

2

3,556 3,483


93,663

86,831

Customer deposits by industry - overseas

Households

9,876

9,461

All other non-NZ residents

516

537

10,392 9,998

Total customer deposits

104,055

96,829

Wholesale funding (financial and insurance services industry)

New Zealand

8,082

9,134

Overseas

21,006

21,339

Total wholesale funding 29,088 30,473

Total funding


133,143

127,302

Concentrations of funding by geography

New Zealand

101,745

95,965

Australia

739

796

United States 13,671 13,471

Europe

9,618

9,784

Other countries

7,370

7,286

Total funding


133,143

127,302

1

Including items reclassified as held for sale.

2

Other includes mining; electricity, gas, water and waste services; transport, postal and warehousing; information media and telecommunications; education and training; health care and

social assistance.




38

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



15. FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT (continued)

RESIDUAL CONTRACTUAL MATURITY ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL OF THE BANKING GROUP’S LIABILITIES

The table below provides residual contractual maturity analysis of financial liabilities at 30 September 2018 within relevant maturity groupings. All

outstanding debt issuances are profiled on the earliest date on which the Banking Group may be required to pay. The amounts represent principal

and interest cash flows – so they may differ from equivalent amounts reported on the balance sheet.

It should be noted that this is not how the Banking Group manages its liquidity risk.



On demand

Less than

3 months

3 to 12

months

1 to 5

years

After

5 years Total

2018 NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m

Settlement balances owed by the Banking Group

1,338 837 - - - 2,175

Collateral received - 845 - - - 845

Deposits and other borrowings

1


52,016 25,701 27,008 4,854 - 109,579

Derivative financial liabilities (trading)

- 6,147 - - - 6,147

Debt issuances

2

- 930 3,676 17,810 4,596 27,012

Other financial liabilities

1


- 119 7 44 76 246

Derivative financial instruments

(balance sheet management)


- gross inflows - 1,790 2,033 9,080 1,266 14,169

- gross outflows

- (1,998) (2,218) (9,368) (1,179) (14,763)


On demand

Less than

3 months

3 to 12

months

1 to 5

years

After

5 years Total

2017 NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m

Settlement balances owed by the Banking Group 1,165 685 - - - 1,850

Collateral received - 613 - - - 613

Deposits and other borrowings

1

58,287 24,814 24,320 4,504 - 111,925

Derivative financial liabilities (trading) - 8,057 - - - 8,057

Debt issuances

2

- 1,604 2,950 16,496 5,424 26,474

Other financial liabilities

1

- 155 6 56 144 361

Derivative financial instruments

(balance sheet management)


- gross inflows - 2,082 2,300 8,128 2,867 15,377

- gross outflows - (2,235) (2,433) (8,328) (2,741) (15,737)

1

Including items reclassified as held for sale.

² Any callable wholesale debt instruments have been included at their next call date. Refer to Note 14 Debt Issuances for subordinated debt call dates.


At 30 September 2018, NZ$93 million (2017: NZ$88 million) of the Banking Group’s non-credit related commitments and NZ$30,105 million (2017:

NZ$29,377 million) of its credit related commitments and contingent liabilities mature in less than 1 year, based on the earliest date on which the

Banking Group may be required to pay.





39

ANZ BANK NEW ZEALAND LIMITED 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


16. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL ASSETS AND FINANCIAL LIABILITIES

The Banking Group carries a significant number of financial instruments on the balance sheet at fair value. The fair value of a financial instrument is the

price that would be re ceived to sell an asset, or paid to transfer a liability, in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement

date.

VALUATION OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The Banking Group has an established control framework, including an appropriate segregation of duties, to ensure that fair values are accurately

determined, reported and controlled. The framework includes the following features:

• products are approved for transacting with external customers and counterparties only where fair values can be appropriately determined;

• quoted market prices used to value financial instruments are independently verified with information from external pricing providers;

• fair value methodologies and inputs are evaluated and approved by a function independent of the party that undertakes the transaction;

• movements in fair values are independently monitored and explained by reference to underlying factors relevant to the fair value; and

• valuation adjustments (such as FVA, CVA and bid-offer) are independently validated and monitored.

If the Banking Group holds offsetting risk positions, then the Banking Group uses the portfolio exemption in NZ IFRS 13 Fair Value Measurement (NZ

IFRS 13) to measure the fair value of such groups of financial assets and financial liabilities. We measure the portfolio based on the price that would be

received to sell a net long position (an asset) for a particular risk exposure, or to transfer a net short position (a liability) for a particular risk exposure.

FAIR VALUE APPROACH AND VALUATION TECHNIQUES

We use valuation techniques to estimate the fair value of financial assets and liabilities for recognition, measurement and disclosure purposes where

no quoted price in an active market exists for that asset or liability. This includes the following:

Asset or Liability Fair Value Approach

Financial instruments classified as:

- Trading securities

- Derivative financial assets and liabilities

- Available-for-sale assets

Valuation techniques are used that incorporate observable market inputs for financial instruments

with similar credit risk, maturity and yield characteristics.

Financial instruments classified as:

- Net loans and advances

- Deposits and other borrowings

- Debt issuances

Discounted cash flow techniques in which contractual future cash flows of the instrument are

discounted using discount rates incorporating wholesale market rates, or market borrowing rates,

for debt with similar maturities or with a yield curve appropriate for the remaining term to maturity.

CLASSIFICATION OF FINANCIAL ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

The following tables set out the classification of financial asset and liability categories according to measurement bases together with the carrying

amounts as reported on the balance sheet.

2018 2017


Fair value

details refer


At

amortised

cost

At fair

value Total

At

amortised

cost

At fair

value Total

to Note NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m

Financial assets


Cash and cash equivalents

2,200 - 2,200

2,338 - 2,338

Settlement balances owed to the Banking Group

656 - 656

536 - 536

Collateral paid

1,919 - 1,919

1,415 - 1,415

Trading securities 8

- 8,024 8,024

- 7,663 7,663

Derivative financial instruments 9 - 8,086 8,086 - 9,878 9,878

Available-for-sale assets 10 - 6,502 6,502 - 6,360 6,360

Net loans and advances

1


126,466 - 126,466

120,539 - 120,539

Other financial assets

1


592 127 719

621 123 744

Total


131,833 22,739 154,572

125,449 24,024 149,473

Financial liabilities


Settlement balances owed by the Banking Group

2,161 - 2,161

1,840 - 1,840

Collateral received

845 - 845

613 - 613

Deposits and other borrowings

1

13 105,522 2,486 108,008 98,975 3,721 102,696

Derivative financial instruments 9 - 8,095 8,095 - 9,826 9,826

Debt issuances

25,135 - 25,135

24,606 - 24,606

Other financial liabilities

1


576 110 686

608 151 759

Total


134,239 10,691 144,930

126,642 13,698 140,340

1

Including items reclassified as held for sale.





40

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



16. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL ASSETS AND FINANCIAL LIABILITIES (continued)

FINANCIAL ASSETS AND LIABILITIES CARRIED AT FAIR VALUE ON THE BALANCE SHEET

The Banking Group categorises financial assets and liabilities carried at fair value into a fair value hierarchy as required by NZ IFRS 13 based on the

observability of inputs used to measure fair value:

• Level 1 – valuations based on quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical financial instruments;

• Level 2 – valuations using inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for a similar financial asset or liability,

either directly or indirectly; and

• Level 3 – valuations using inputs for the assets or liability that are not based on observable market data (unobservable inputs).

The table below summarises the attribution of financial instruments carried at fair value to the fair value hierarchy:


Fair value measurements


Quoted market price

(Level 1)

Using observable

inputs

(Level 2)

Using unobservable

inputs (Level 3)

Total

2018 2017 2018 2017 2018 2017 2018 2017

NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m

Assets








Trading securities

6,795

7,276

1,229

387

-

-

8,024

7,663

Derivative financial instruments 7 5 8,076 9,870 3 3 8,086 9,878

Available-for-sale assets 6,457 5,336 44 1,023 1 1 6,502 6,360

Investments backing insurance contract liabilities

1

- - 127 123 - - 127 123

Total 13,259

12,617

9,476

11,403

4

4

22,739

24,024

Liabilities








Deposits and other borrowings

1


-

-

2,486

3,721

-

-

2,486

3,721

Derivative financial instruments

10

24

8,084

9,801

1

1

8,095

9,826

Other financial liabilities

110

151

-

-

-

-

110

151

Total 120 175 10,570 13,522 1 1 10,691 13,698

1

Including items reclassified as held for sale.

Fair value designation

We designate commercial paper (included in deposits and other borrowings) as fair value through profit or loss where they are managed on a fair

value basis to align the measurement with how the instruments are managed.




41

ANZ BANK NEW ZEALAND LIMITED 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





42

16. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL ASSETS AND FINANCIAL LIABILITIES (continued)

FINANCIAL ASSETS AND FINANCIAL LIABILITIES NOT MEASURED AT FAIR VALUE

The following sets out the Banking Group’s basis of estimating fair values of the above financial instruments carried at amortised cost:

Financial Asset and Liability Fair Value Approach

Net loans and advances to banks Discounted cash flows using prevailing market rates for loans with similar credit quality.

Net loans and advances to customers Present value of future cash flows, discounted using a curve that incorporates changes in

wholesale market rates, the Banking Group cost of wholesale funding and the customer margin, as

appropriate.

Deposit liability without a specified maturity or

at call

The amount payable on demand at the reporting date. We do not adjust the fair value for any

value we expect the Banking Group to derive from retaining the deposit for a future period.

Interest bearing fixed maturity deposits and

other borrowings and acceptances with

quoted market rates

Market borrowing rates of interest for debt with a similar maturity are used to discount contractual

cash flows to derive the fair value.

Debt issuances Calculated based on quoted market prices or observable inputs as applicable. If quoted market

prices are not available, we use a discounted cash flow model using a yield curve appropriate for

the remaining term to maturity of the debt instrument. The fair value reflects adjustments to credit

spreads applicable to the Banking Group for that instrument.

The financial assets and financial liabilities listed in the table below are carried at amortised cost on the Banking Group’s Balance Sheet. While this is

the value at which we expect the assets will be realised and the liabilities settled, the Banking Group provides an estimate of the fair value of the

financial assets and financial liabilities at balance date in the table below.


Carrying amount Categorised into fair value hierarchy Fair value (total)


Quoted market price

(Level 1)

Using observable

inputs

(Level 2)

With significant non-

observable inputs

(Level 3)

2018 2017 2018 2017 2018 2017 2018 2017 2018 2017

NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m

Financial assets










Net loans and advances

1, 2


126,466

120,539

-

-

131

136

126,614

120,452

126,745

120,588

Total 126,466

120,539

-

-

131

136

126,614

120,452

126,745

120,588

Financial liabilities










Deposits and other

borrowings

1


105,522

98,975

-

-

105,592

99,030

-

-

105,592

99,030

Debt issuances 25,135 24,606 2,533 2,855 22,929 22,163 - - 25,462 25,018

Total 130,657

123,581

2,533

2,855

128,521

121,193

-

-

131,054

124,048

1

Including items reclassified as held for sale.

2

We have reviewed the fair value of Net Loans and advances previously presented as Level 2. In line with broader industry practice Net loans and advances other than Loans to Banks are

now presented as Level 3.







The Banking Group evaluates the material accuracy of the valuations incorporated in the financial statements as they can involve a high degree

of judgement and estimation in determining the carrying values of financial assets and financial liabilities at the balance sheet date.

The majority of valuation models the Banking Group uses employ only observable market data as inputs. However, for certain financial

instruments, we may use data that is not readily observable in current markets. If we use unobservable market data, then we need to exercise

more judgement to determine fair value depending on the significance of the unobservable input to the overall valuation. Generally, we

derive unobservable inputs from other relevant market data and compare them to observed transaction prices where available.

When establishing the fair value of a financial instrument using a valuation technique, the Banking Group considers valuation adjustments in

determining the fair value. We may apply adjustments (such as bid/offer spreads, credit valuation adjustments and funding valuation

adjustments – refer Note 9 Derivative Financial Instruments) to the techniques used to reflect the Banking Group’s assessment of factors that

market participants would consider in setting fair value.


NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



17. ASSETS CHARGED AS SECURITY FOR LIABILITIES AND COLLATERAL ACCEPTED AS

SECURITY FOR ASSETS

The following disclosure excludes the amounts presented as collateral paid and received in the Balance Sheet that relate to derivative liabilities and

derivative assets respectively. The terms and conditions of those collateral agreements are included in the standard Credit Support Annex that forms

part of the International Swaps and Derivatives Association Master Agreement.

ASSETS CHARGED AS SECURITY FOR LIABILITIES

Assets charged as security for liabilities include the following types of instruments:

• Securities provided as collateral for repurchase transactions. These transactions are governed by standard industry agreements.

• UDC Secured Investments are secured by a security interest granted under a trust deed over all of UDC’s present and future assets and

undertakings, to Trustees Executors Limited, as supervisor. The assets subject to the security interest comprise mainly loans to UDC's customers

and certain plant and equipment. The security interest secures all amounts payable by UDC on the UDC Secured Investments and all other

monies payable by UDC under the trust deed.

• Specified residential mortgages provided as security for notes and bonds issued to investors as part of the Banking Group’s covered bond

programmes.

The carrying amounts of assets pledged as security are as follows:


2018 2017

NZ$m NZ$m

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase

1


517

157

Assets pledged as collateral for UDC secured investments

3,296

2,985

Residential mortgages pledged as security for covered bonds 10,747 10,595

1

The amounts disclosed as securities sold under arrangements to repurchase include both:

• assets pledged as security which continue to be recognised on the Banking Group’s balance sheet; and

• assets repledged, which are included in the disclosure below.


COLLATERAL ACCEPTED AS SECURITY FOR ASSETS

The Banking Group has received collateral associated with various financial instruments. Under certain transactions the Banking Group has the right to

sell, or to repledge, the collateral received. These transactions are governed by standard industry agreements.

The fair value of collateral we have received and that we have sold or repledged is as follows:


2018 2017

NZ$m NZ$m

Fair value of assets which can be sold or repledged

139

361

Fair value of assets sold or repledged

34

218




43

ANZ BANK NEW ZEALAND LIMITED 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


18. OFFSETTING

We offset financial assets and financial liabilities in the balance sheet (in accordance with NZ IAS 32 Financial Instruments: Presentation) when there is:

• a current legally enforceable right to set off the recognised amounts in all circumstances; and

• an intention to settle the asset and liability on a net basis, or to realise the asset and settle the liability simultaneously.

If the above conditions are not met, the financial assets and financial liabilities are presented on a gross basis.

The Banking Group does not have any arrangements that satisfy the conditions necessary to offset financial assets and financial liabilities within the

balance sheet. The following table identifies financial assets and financial liabilities which have not been offset but are subject to enforceable master

netting agreements (or similar arrangements) and the related amounts not offset in the balance sheet. We have not taken into account the effect of

over collateralisation.


Amount subject to master netting agreement or similar


Total amounts

recognised

in the

Balance Sheet

Amounts not

subject to

master

netting

agreement or

similar Total

Financial

instruments

Financial

collateral

(received)/

pledged Net amount

2018 NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m

Derivative financial instruments

8,086 (1,029) 7,057 (5,711) (481) 865

Reverse repurchase agreements

1


136 - 136 - (136) -

Total financial assets 8,222 (1,029) 7,193 (5,711) (617) 865

Derivative financial instruments

(8,095) 694 (7,401) 5,711 563 (1,127)

Repurchase agreements

2


(517) - (517) - 517 -

Total financial liabilities (8,612) 694 (7,918) 5,711 1,080 (1,127)




Amount subject to master netting agreement or similar


Total amounts

recognised

in the

Balance Sheet

Amounts not

subject to

master

netting

agreement or

similar Total

Financial

instruments

Financial

collateral

(received)/

pledged Net amount


2017 NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m

Derivative financial instruments 9,878 (1,933) 7,945 (7,478) (245) 222

Reverse repurchase agreements

1

360 - 360 - (360) -

Total financial assets

10,238 (1,933) 8,305 (7,478) (605) 222

Derivative financial instruments (9,826) 1,386 (8,440) 7,478 348 (614)

Repurchase agreements

2

(157) - (157) - 157 -

Total financial liabilities

(9,983) 1,386 (8,597) 7,478 505 (614)

1

Reverse repurchase agreements are presented in the Balance Sheet within cash and cash equivalents.

2

Repurchase agreements are presented in the Balance Sheet within deposits and other borrowings.




44

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



19. GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS



2018 2017

Note NZ$m NZ$m

Goodwill 3,230 3,230

Software


53 67

Other intangibles


107 111

Goodwill and other intangible assets (including assets reclassified as held for sale)

3,390

3,408

Less: Goodwill and other intangible assets reclassified as held for sale 25

(101)

(133)

Goodwill and other intangible assets


3,289

3,275


GOODWILL ALLOCATED TO CASH-GENERATING UNITS (CGUs)

An annual assessment is made as to whether the current carrying value of goodwill is impaired. For the purposes of impairment testing, goodwill is

allocated at the date of acquisition to a CGU. Goodwill is considered to be impaired if the carrying amount of the relevant CGU exceeds its recoverable

amount.

To estimate the recoverable amount of the CGU to which each goodwill component is allocated, we use a value-in -use approach.

VALUE-IN-USE

These calculations use cash flow projections based on a number of financial budgets within each segment approved by management covering a

three year period. Cash flow projections are based on a range of readily available economic assumptions including Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and

the Consumer Price Index (CPI). Cash flows beyond the three year period are extrapolated using a 3% growth rate.

These cash flow projections are discounted using a capital asset pricing model. As at 28 February 2018 when the last valuation was prepared, a

discount rate of 11.4% was applied to each cash generating unit. The main variables in the calculation of the discount rate used are the risk free rate,

the beta rate and the market risk premium. The risk free rate is based on the 10 year Government Bond Rate. The beta rate and the market risk

premium are consistent with observable and comparative market rates applied in the regional banking sector. Market observable information is not

readily available at the segment level therefore management performed stress tests for key sensitivities in each segment.

Management believes any reasonable possible change in the key assumptions on which the recoverable amount is based would not cause the

carrying amount of goodwill for any CGU to exceed its recoverable amount.




45

ANZ BANK NEW ZEALAND LIMITED 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





46

19. GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS (continued)
















































Management judgement is used to assess the recoverable value of goodwill, and other intangible assets, and the useful economic life of

an asset (or if an asset has an indefinite life). We reassess the recoverability of the carrying value at each reporting date.

The carrying amount of goodwill is based on judgements including the basis of assumptions and forecasts used for determining earnings

for CGUs, headroom availability, and sensitivities of the forecasts to reasonably possible changes in assumptions. Goodwill is assessed for

indicators of impairment quarterly and tested for impairment annually. The level at which goodwill is allocated, the estimation of future cash

flows and the selection of discount rates or earnings multiples applied requires significant judgement.

At each balance date, software and other intangible assets are assessed for indicators of impairment. In addition, software and intangible

assets not ready for use are tested annually for impairment. In the event that an asset’s carrying amount is determined to be greater than

its recoverable amount, the carrying value of the asset is written down immediately.


In addition, the expected useful life of intangible assets, including software assets, are assessed on an annual basis. The assessment

requires management judgement, and in relation to our software assets, a number of factors can influence the expected economic useful

lives. These factors include changes to business strategy, significant divestments and the underlying pace of technological change.





RECOGNITION AND MEASUREMENT

The table below details how we recognise and measure different intangible assets:

Intangible Goodwill Software Other Intangible Assets

Definition

Excess amount the Banking

Group has paid in acquiring a

business over the fair value less

costs of disposal of the

identifiable assets and liabilities

acquired.

Purchases of off the shelf software

assets are capitalised as assets.

Internal and external costs incurred

in building software and computer

systems costing greater than

NZ$20 million are capitalised as

assets. Those less than NZ$20

million are expensed in the year in

which the costs are incurred.

Acquired portfolios of insurance

and investment business and

management fee rights.

Carrying value

Cost less any accumulated

impairment losses.

Allocated to the cash

generating unit to which the

acquisition relates.

Initially, measured at cost.

Subsequently, carried at cost less

accumulated amortisation and

impairment losses.

Costs incurred in planning or

evaluating software proposals or in

maintaining systems after

implementation are not capitalised.

Initially, measured at fair value at

acquisition.

Subsequently, carried at fair value

less accumulated amortisation and

impairment losses.

Useful life

Indefinite.

Goodwill is reviewed for

impairment at least annually or

when there is an indication of

impairment.

Except for major core

infrastructure, amortised over

periods between 3-5 years.

Major core infrastructure amortised

over periods between 7 or 10 years.

Acquired portfolios of insurance

and investment business are

amortised over 20 years.

Management fee rights have an

indefinite life and are reviewed for

impairment at least annually or

when there is an indication of

impairment.

Depreciation method Not applicable. Straight-line method.

Actuarial methods consistent with

the calculation of life insurance

contract assets.


NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



20. SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY




Number of issued shares NZ$ millions

2018 2017 2018 2017

Ordinary shares




Ordinary shares at start of year

3,345,755,498

3,345,755,498

8,588

8,588

Ordinary shares issued during the year

3,000,000,000

-

3,000

-

Ordinary shares at end of year

1


6,345,755,498

3,345,755,498

11,588

8,588

Preference shares 300,000,000 300,000,000 300 300

Total share capital 6,645,755,498 3,645,755,498 11,888 8,888

1

Includes 650,712 (2017: 650,712) uncalled shares.


Preference shares

The key terms of the preference shares are as follows:

Dividends

Dividends are payable at the discretion of the directors of the Bank and are non-cumulative. The Bank must not resolve to pay any dividend or make

any other distribution on its ordinary shares until the next preference dividend payment date if the dividend on the preference shares is not paid.

Should the Bank elect to pay a dividend, the dividend is based on a floating rate equal to the aggregate of the New Zealand 6 month bank bill rate

plus a 325 basis point margin, multiplied by one minus the New Zealand company tax rate, with dividend payments due on 1 March and 1 September

each year.

Redemption features

The preference shares are redeemable, subject to prior written approval of RBNZ, by the Bank providing notice in writing to holders of the preference

shares:

• on any date on or after a change to laws or regulations that adversely affects the regulatory capital or tax treatment of the preference shares; or


• on any dividend payment date on or after 1 March 2019; or

• on any date after 1 March 2019 if the Bank has ceased to be a wholly owned subsidiary of the Ultimate Parent Bank.

The preference shares may be redeemed for nil consideration should a non-viability trigger event occur.

The preference shares qualify as AT1 capital for RBNZ’s capital adequacy purposes.














RECOGNITION AND MEASUREMENT

Ordinary shares

Ordinary shares have no par value. They entitle holders to receive dividends, or proceeds available on winding

up of the Company, in proportion to the number of fully paid ordinary shares held. They are recognised at the

amount paid per ordinary share net of directly attributable costs. Every holder of fully paid ordinary shares

present at a meeting in person, or by proxy, is entitled to:

• on a show of hands, one vote; and

• on a poll, one vote, for each share held.

Preference shares

All preference shares were issued by the Bank to the Immediate Parent and do not carry any voting rights. The

preference shares are wholly classified as equity instruments as there is no contractual obligation for the Bank

to either deliver cash or another financial instrument or to exchange financial instruments on a potentially

unfavourable basis.

In the event of liquidation, holders of preference shares are entitled to available subscribed capital per share,

pari passu with all holders of existing preference shares and ANZ capital notes but in priority to all holders of

ordinary shares. They have no entitlement to participate in further distribution of profits or assets.

Reserves:


Cash flow hedge

reserve

Includes fair value gains and losses associated with the effective portion of designated cash flow hedging

instruments, net of deferred taxes to be realised when the position is settled.

Available-for-sale

reserve

Includes the changes in fair value and exchange differences on our revaluation of available-for-sale financial

assets, net of deferred taxes to be realised upon disposal of the asset.






47

ANZ BANK NEW ZEALAND LIMITED 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


21. CAPITAL MANAGEMENT

CAPITAL MANAGEMENT STRATEGY

The Banking Group’s core capital objectives are to:

• protect the interests of depositors, creditors and shareholders;

• ensure the safety and soundness of the Banking Group’s capital position; and

• ensure that the capital base supports the Banking Group’s risk appetite, and strategic business objectives, in an efficient and effective manner.

The Board holds ultimate responsibility for ensuring that capital adequacy is maintained. This includes: setting, monitoring and obtaining assurance for

the Banking Group’s Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process (ICAAP) policy and framework; standardised risk definitions for all material risks;

materiality thresholds; capital adequacy targets; internal economic risk capital principles; and risk appetite.

The Banking Group has minimum and trigger levels for common equity tier 1, tier 1 and total capital that ensure sufficient capital is maintained to:

• meet minimum prudential requirements imposed by regulators;

• ensure consistency with the Banking Group’s overall risk profile and financial positions, taking into account its strategic focus and business plan;

and

• support the economic risk capital requirements of the business.

ALCO and its related Capital Management Forum are responsible for developing, implementing and maintaining the Banking Group's ICAAP

framework, including ongoing monitoring, reporting and compliance. The Banking Group’s ICAAP is subject to independent and periodic review

conducted by Internal Audit.

The Banking Group complied with all the regulatory Capital Adequacy requirements during the current and prior years.

REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT

As the Bank is a registered bank in New Zealand, it is primarily regulated by RBNZ under the Reserve Bank of New Zealand Act 1989. The Bank must

comply with the minimum regulatory capital requirements, capital ratios and specific reporting levels that RBNZ sets. RBNZ requirements are

summarised below:


Regulatory capital definition Minimum capital ratios

Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) capital

Comprises ordinary share capital, retained

earnings, and certain accounting reserves. Some

amounts (e.g. the value of goodwill) must be

deducted to determine the final value of CET1

capital.

CET1 capital divided by total risk weighted assets

must be at least 4.5%.

Tier 1 capital CET1 capital plus additional tier 1 instruments,

which comprise high-quality capital and must:

• provide a permanent and unrestricted

commitment of funds;

• be freely available to absorb losses; and

provide for fully discretionary capital

distributions.

Tier 1 capital divided by total risk weighted assets

must be at least 6.0%.

Tier 2 capital

Tier 2 instruments include some subordinated

instruments and accounting reserves that are not

included in Tier 1 capital. Some amounts are

deducted in determining the value of Tier 2

instruments.

No minimum.

Total capital

Tier 1 plus Tier 2 capital. Total capital divided by total risk weighted assets

must be at least 8.0%.

Capital buffer

The Capital buffer is actual CET1 capital in excess

of any of the minimum capital requirements

imposed on the Bank.

Capital buffer divided by total risk weighted assets

should be at least 2.5%.



Reporting levels


Solo consolidated

The registered bank plus subsidiaries which are funded exclusively and wholly owned by the

registered bank.

Banking Group

The registered bank’s consolidated group.


The Bank measures capital adequacy and reports to RBNZ on a Banking Group basis monthly, and measures capital adequacy on a Solo consolidated

basis quarterly. Banking Group and Solo consolidated capital ratios are reported publicly in six-monthly disclosure statements.





48

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



21. CAPITAL MANAGEMENT (continued)

CAPITAL ADEQUACY

The following table provides details of the Banking Group’s capital ratios at 30 September:

2018 2017

Unaudited NZ$m NZ$m

Qualifying capital




Tier 1

Shareholder's equity 13,109 12,781

Preference shares included in Additional Tier 1 capital (300) (300)

Gross Common Equity Tier 1 capital 12,809 12,481

Deductions (3,728) (3,754)

Common Equity Tier 1 capital 9,081 8,727

Additional tier 1 capital

2,776

2,778

Tier 1 capital


11,857

11,505

Tier 2 capital


-

234

Total capital


11,857

11,739

Capital adequacy ratios




Common Equity Tier 1

11.1%

10.7%

Tier 1

14.4%

14.1%

Tier 2


0.0%

0.3%

Total


14.4%

14.4%

Buffer ratio

6.4%

6.2%

Risk weighted assets


82,147

81,642



22. CONTROLLED ENTITIES

The following table lists the principal subsidiaries of the Bank. Principal subsidiaries are those that have transactions or balances with parties outside

the Banking Group. All subsidiaries are 100% owned and incorporated in New Zealand.

Nature of business

ANZ Bank New Zealand Limited Registered bank

ANZ Investment Services (New Zealand) Limited Funds management

ANZ New Zealand (Int'l) Limited Finance

ANZ New Zealand Investments Limited Funds management

ANZ New Zealand Securities Limited On-line share broker

ANZNZ Covered Bond Trust

1

Securitisation entity

Arawata Assets Limited Property

Karapiro Investments Limited Asset finance

Kingfisher NZ Trust 2008-1

1

Securitisation entity

OnePath Life (NZ) Limited Insurance

UDC Finance Limited Asset finance

1

The Banking Group does not own ANZNZ Covered Bond Trust and Kingfisher NZ Trust 2008-1. Control exists as the Banking Group retains substantially all the risks and rewards of the

operations. Details of the Banking Group’s interest in consolidated structured entities is included in Note 23 Structured Entities.















RECOGNITION AND MEASUREMENT

The Banking Group subsidiaries are those entities it controls through:

• being exposed to, or having rights to, variable returns from the entity; and

• being able to affect those returns through its power over the entity.

The Banking Group assesses whether it has power over those entities by examining the Banking Group’s existing rights to direct the relevant

activities of the entity.






49

ANZ BANK NEW ZEALAND LIMITED 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


23. STRUCTURED ENTITIES

A Structured Entity (SE) is an entity that has been designed such that voting or similar rights are not the dominant factor in deciding who controls the

entity, such as when any voting rights relate to administrative tasks only and the relevant activities (being those that significantly affect the entity’s

returns) are directed by means of contractual arrangement. A SE often has some or all of the following features or attributes:

• restricted activities;

• a narrow and well defined objective;

• insufficient equity to permit the SE to finance its activities without subordinated financial support; and

• financing in the form of multiple contractually linked instruments to investors that create concentrations of credit or other risks (tranches).

The Banking Group is involved with both consolidated and unconsolidated SEs which may be established by the Banking Group or by a third party.

SEs are classified as subsidiaries and consolidated when control exists. If the Banking Group does not control a SE, then it will not be consolidated (an

unconsolidated SE). This note provides information on both consolidated and unconsolidated SEs.

The Banking Group’s involvement with SEs is as follows:

Type Details

Securitisation

The Banking Group uses the Kingfisher NZ Trust 2008-1 (the Kingfisher Trust) to securitise residential mortgages

that it has originated, in order to diversify sources of funding for liquidity management. The Kingfisher Trust is an

internal securitisation (bankruptcy remote) vehicle we created for the purpose of structuring assets that are eligible

for repurchase under agreements with RBNZ (these are known as ‘Repo eligible’).

The Banking Group is exposed to variable returns from its involvement with the Kingfisher Trust and has the ability

to affect those returns through its power over the Kingfisher Trust’s activities. The Kingfisher Trust is therefore

consolidated.

As at 30 September 2018 and 30 September 2017 the Banking Group had not entered into any repurchase

agreements with RBNZ for residential mortgage backed securities issued and therefore no collateral had been

accepted by RBNZ under this facility.

Additionally, the Banking Group may acquire interests in securitisation vehicles set up by third parties through

providing lending facilities to, or holding securities issued by, such entities.

ANZNZ Covered Bond Trust

(the Covered Bond Trust)

Substantially all of the assets of the Covered Bond Trust are made up of certain housing loans and related

securities originated by the Bank which are security for the guarantee by ANZNZ Covered Bond Trust Limited as

trustee of the Covered Bond Trust of issuances of covered bonds by the Bank, or its wholly owned subsidiary ANZ

New Zealand (Int’l) Limited, from time to time. The assets of the Covered Bond Trust are not available to creditors

of the Bank, although the Bank (or its liquidator or statutory manager) may have a claim against the residual assets

of the Covered Bond Trust (if any) after all prior ranking creditors of the Covered Bond Trust have been satisfied.

The Banking Group is exposed to variable returns from its involvement with the Covered Bond Trust and has the

ability to affect those returns through its power over the Covered Bond Trust’s activities. The Covered Bond Trust is

therefore consolidated.

Structured finance

arrangements


The Banking Group is involved with SEs established:

• in connection with structured lending transactions to facilitate debt syndication and/or to ring-fence

collateral; and

• to own assets that are leased to customers in structured leasing transactions.

The Banking Group may provide risk management products (derivatives) to the SE.

In all instances, the Banking Group does not control these SEs. Further, the Banking Group’s involvement does not

establish more than a passive interest in decisions about the relevant activities of the SE, and accordingly we do

not consider that interest disclosable.

Funds management activities

The Banking Group is the scheme manager for a number of Managed Investment Schemes (MIS). These MIS

include the ANZ and OneAnswer branded KiwiSaver, retail and wholesale schemes and the Bonus Bonds Scheme,

and are considered to be SEs.


CONSOLIDATED STRUCTURED ENTITIES

Financial or Other Support Provided to Consolidated Structured Entities

The Bank provides lending facilities, derivatives and commitments to the Kingfisher Trust and the Covered Bond Trust and/or holds debt instruments

that they have issued. The Bank did not provide any non-contractual support to consolidated SEs during the year (2017: nil).







50

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS






51

23. STRUCTURED ENTITIES (continued)

UNCONSOLIDATED STRUCTURED ENTITIES

The Banking Group’s Interest in Unconsolidated Structured Entities

An ‘interest’ in an unconsolidated SE is any form of contractual or non-contractual involvement with an SE that exposes the Banking Group to

variability of returns from the performance of that SE. These interests include, but are not limited to: holdings of debt or equity securities; derivatives

that pass on risks specific to the performance of the SE; lending; loan commitments; financial guarantees; and fees from funds management activities.

For the purpose of disclosing in terests in unconsolidated SEs:

• no disclosure is made if the Banking Group’s involvement is not more than a passive interest - for example: when the Banking Group’s

involvement constitutes a typical customer-supplier relationship. On this basis, exposures to unconsolidated SEs that arise from lending, trading

and investing activities are not considered disclosable interests - unless the design of the structured entity allows the Banking Group to

participate in decisions about the relevant activities (being those that significantly affect the entity’s returns).

• ‘interests’ do not include derivatives intended to expose the Banking Group to market risk (rather than performance risk specific to the SE) or

derivatives through which the Banking Group creates, rather than absorbs, variability of the unconsolidated SE (such as purchase of credit

protection under a credit default swap).

The Banking Group earned funds management fees from its MIS of NZ$191 million (2017: NZ$170 million) during the year. Size of these MIS is

indicated by Funds Under Management which varies by fund, with a maximum value of approximately NZ$3.3 billion (2017: NZ$3.4 billion).

The Banking Group did not provide any non-contractual support to unconsolidated SEs during the year (2017: nil): nor does it have any current

intention to provide financial or other support to unconsolidated SEs.

SPONSORED UNCONSOLIDATED STRUCTURED ENTITIES

The Banking Group may also sponsor unconsolidated SEs in which it has no disclosable interest.

For the purposes of this disclosure, the Banking Group considers itself the ‘sponsor’ of an unconsolidated SE if it is the primary party involved in the

design and establishment of that SE and:

• the Banking Group is the major user of that SE; or

• the Banking Group’s name appears in the name of that SE, or on its products; or

• the Banking Group provides implicit or explicit guarantees of that SE’s performance.

The Bank has sponsored the ANZ PIE Fund, which invests only in deposits with the Bank. The Banking Group does not provide any implicit or explicit

guarantees of the capital value or performance of investments in the ANZ PIE Fund. There was no income received from, nor assets transferred to, this

entity during the year.





24. TRANSFERS OF FINANCIAL ASSETS

In the normal course of business the Banking Group enters into transactions where it transfers financial assets directly to third parties. These transfers

may give rise to the Banking Group fully, or partially, derecognising those financial assets - depending on the Banking Group’s exposure to the risks

and rewards or control over the transferred assets. If the Banking Group retains substantially all of the risk and rewards of a transferred asset, the

transfer does not qualify for derecognition and the asset remains on the Banking Group’s balance sheet in its entirety.

Covered bonds

The Banking Group operates a covered bond programme to raise funding. Refer to Note 23 Structured Entities for further details. The covered bonds

issued externally are included within debt is suances.











Significant judgement is required in assessing whether control exists over Structured Entities involved in securitisation activities,

structured finance transactions and investment funds. Judgement is required in relation to the existence of:

•power over the relevant activities (being those that significantly affect the entity’s returns); and

•exposure to variable returns of that entity.


ANZ BANK NEW ZEALAND LIMITED 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





52

24. TRANSFERS OF FINANCIAL ASSETS (continued)

Repurchase agreements

If the Banking Group sells securities subject to repurchase agreements under which substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership remain with

the Banking Group, then those assets are considered to be transferred assets that do not qualify for derecognition. An associated liability is recognised

for the consideration received from the counterparty.

The table below sets out the balance of assets transferred that do not qualify for derecognition, along with the associated liabilities:


Covered bonds Repurchase agreements


2018 2017 2018 2017

NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m

Current carrying amount of assets transferred 10,747 10,595 517 157

Carrying amount of associated liabilities 3,929 5,315 517 157


25. ASSETS AND LIABILITIES HELD FOR SALE

UDC

On 11 January 2017, the Bank announced that it had entered into a conditional agreement to sell UDC to HNA Group (HNA). On 21 December 2017,

the Bank announced that it had been informed that the New Zealand Overseas Investment Office had declined HNA's application to acquire UDC and

the agreement with HNA was terminated in January 2018. The assets and liabilities of UDC are no longer classified as held for sale as at 30 September

2018.

OnePath

On 30 May 2018, the Bank announced that it had agreed to sell OnePath to Cigna Corporation and the final regulatory approval was obtained on 29

October 2018. The transaction is subject to closing conditions and the Bank expects it to close in the 2019 financial year.



2018 2017

OnePath UDC

NZ$m NZ$m

Net loans and advances

-

2,912

Life insurance contract assets 662 -

Goodwill and other intangible assets 101 133

Investments backing insurance contract liabilities 127 -

Other assets 7 20

Total assets held for sale 897 3,065

Deposits and other borrowings - 1,039

Current tax liabilities

16

24

Deferred tax liabilities

175

(9)

Payables and other liabilities

143

33

Employee entitlements

-

1

Total liabilities held for sale 334

1,088












A significant level of judgement is used by the Banking Group to determine:

•whether an asset or group of assets is classified and presented as held for sale or as a discontinued operation; and

•the fair value of the assets and liabilities classified as being held for sale.

Any impairment we record is based on the best available evidence of the fair value compared to the carrying value before the impairment.

The final sale price the Banking Group may achieve will depend on a number of factors and may be different to the fair value we estimate

when recording the impairment. We expect that the sales will complete within 12 months after balance date, subject to the relevant

regulatory approvals and customary terms of sale for such assets.

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



26. RELATED PARTY DISCLOSURES

Key management personnel

Key management personnel (KMP) are defined as directors and those executives who report directly to the Bank’s Chief Executive Officer with

responsibility for the strategic direction and management of a major revenue generating division or who control material revenue and expenses.

Loans made to directors and other KMP are made in the ordinary course of business on normal commercial terms and conditions no more favourable

than those given to other employees or customers, including the term of the loan, security required and the interest rate.

All other transactions with KMP and their related parties are made on terms equivalent to those that prevail in arm’s length transactions. These

transactions generally involve the provision of financial and investment services. All such transactions that have occurred with KMP and their related

parties have been trivial or domestic in nature. In this context, transactions are only disclosed when they are considered of interest to the users of the

financial statements in making and evaluating decisions about the allocation of scarce resources.


2018 2017

NZ$000 NZ$000

Key management personnel compensation



Salaries and short-term employee benefits

11,677

11,430

Post-employment benefits

655

480

Other long-term benefits 38 60

Share-based payments 3,308 3,515

Total


15,678

15,485

Loans to, and securities held by, key management personnel and their related parties


Loans

7,226

5,102

Unsubordinated debt

-

520

Subordinated debt

120

190


Transactions with other related parties

The Bank and Banking Group undertake transactions with the Immediate Parent Company, the Ultimate Parent Bank, other members of the Overseas

Banking Group and associates.

These transactions principally consist of funding and hedging transactions, the provision of other financial and investment services, technology and

process support, and compensation for share based payments made to Banking Group employees. Transactions with related parties outside of the

Banking Group are conducted on an arm’s length basis and on normal commercial terms.

In addition the Bank undertakes similar transactions with subsidiaries, which are eliminated in the consolidated Banking Group financial statements.

Included within the Bank’s transactions with subsidiaries is the provision of administrative functions to some subsidiaries for which no payments have

been made.

Transactions with related parties


2018 2017

NZ$m NZ$m

Ultimate Parent Bank and subsidiaries not part of the Banking Group

Interest income 13 32

Interest expense 138 146

Fee income 9 14

Gain/(loss) on sale of mortgages to the NZ Branch

(1)

(1)

Other operating income

43

23

Operating expenses

52

46

Mortgages sold to the NZ Branch

302

481

Mortgages repurchased from the NZ Branch

1,575

736

Immediate Parent Company


Interest expense 1 1

Ordinary shares issued 3,000 -

Dividends paid 4,611 1,695

Associates




Direct fee expense

10

10

Dividends received

6

5

Share of associates' profit

5

5







53

ANZ BANK NEW ZEALAND LIMITED 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


26. RELATED PARTY DISCLOSURES (continued)

Balances with related parties


2018 2017

NZ$m NZ$m

Ultimate Parent Bank and subsidiaries not part of the Banking Group

Cash and cash equivalents 33 64

Settlement balances owed to the Banking Group

-

111

Derivative financial instruments

2,431

2,623

Other assets

39

42

Immediate Parent Company




Derivative financial instruments

-

4

Associates




Investments in associates 6 7

Total due from related parties 2,509 2,851




Ultimate Parent Bank and subsidiaries not part of the Banking Group




Settlement balances owed by the Banking Group

125

220

Collateral received

257

198

Deposits and other borrowings

11

11

Derivative financial instruments

2,248

2,486

Payables and other liabilities 30 31

Subordinated debt 1,941 1,951

Immediate Parent Company




Deposits and other borrowings

29

62

Derivative financial instruments

1

-

Associates




Payables and other liabilities

1

1

Total due to related parties 4,643 4,960


Balances due from / to related parties are unsecured. The Bank has provided guarantees and commitments to related parties as follows:


2018 2017

NZ$m NZ$m

Financial guarantees provided to the Ultimate Parent Bank

138

155

Undrawn credit commitments provided to the Immediate Parent Company

250

250






27. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES

PROPERTY RELATED COMMITMENTS


2018 2017

NZ$m NZ$m

Property capital expenditure


Contracts for outstanding capital expenditure (not later than 1 year)

7

4

Total capital expenditure commitments for property 7

4

Lease rentals

Land and Buildings 331 370

Furniture and equipment 86 105

Motor vehicles 8 9

Total lease rental commitments 425

484

Due within 1 year

86

84

Due later than 1 year but not later than 5 years

224

256

Due later than 5 years

115

144

Total lease rental commitments 425

484





54

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



27. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES (continued)

CREDIT RELATED COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES


2018 2017


NZ$m NZ$m

Contract amount of:



Undrawn facilities

27,245

26,769

Guarantees and letters of credit

1,531

1,010

Performance related contingencies 1,329 1,598

Total 30,105 29,377


UNDRAWN FACILITIES

The majority of undrawn facilities are subject to customers maintaining specific credit and other requirements or conditions. Many of these facilities

are expected to be only partially used, and others may never be used at all. As such, the total of the nominal principal amounts is not necessarily

representative of future liquidity risks or future cash requirements. Based on the earliest date on which the Banking Group may be required to pay, the

total undrawn facilities of NZ$27,245 million (2017: NZ$26,769 million) mature within 12 months.

GUARANTEES, LETTERS OF CREDIT AND PERFORMANCE RELATED CONTINGENCIES

Guarantees, letters of credit and performance related contingencies relate to transactions that the Banking Group has entered into as principal –

including: guarantees, standby letters of credit and documentary letters of credit.

Documentary letters of credit involve the Banking Group issuing letters of credit guaranteeing payment in favour of an exporter. They are secured

against an underlying shipment of goods or backed by a confirmatory letter of credit from another bank.

Performance related contingencies are liabilities that oblige the Banking Group to make payments to a third party if the customer fails to fulfil its non-

monetary obligations under the contract.

To reflect the risk associated with these transactions, we apply the same credit origination, portfolio management and collateral requirements that we

apply to loans. The contract amount represents the maximum potential amount that we could lose if the counterparty fails to meet its financial

obligations. As the facilities may expire without being drawn upon, the notional amounts do not necessarily reflect future cash requirements. Based

on the earliest date on which the Banking Group may be required to pay, the total guarantees and letters of credit of NZ$1,531 million (2017:

NZ$1,010 million) and total performance related contingencies of NZ$1,329 million (2017: NZ$1,598 million) mature within 12 months.

OTHER CONTINGENT LIABILITIES

There are outstanding court proceedings, claims and possible claims for and against the Banking Group. Where relevant, expert legal advice has been

obtained and, in the light of such advice, provisions and/or disclosures as deemed appropriate have been made. In some instances we have not

disclosed the estimated financial impact of the individual items either because it is not practicable to do so or because such disclosure may prejudice

the interests of the Banking Group.

In recent years there has been an increase in the number of matters on which the Banking Group engages with its regulators. Globally there have

been significant increases in the nature and scale of regulatory investigations and reviews, enforcement actions (whether by court action or otherwise)

and the quantum of fines issued by regulators and customer claims. The Banking Group also instigates engagement with its regulators. The nature of

these investigations and reviews can be wide-ranging and, for example, may include a range of matters including responsible lending practices,

product suitability, wealth advice and adequacy of product disclosure documentation. The Banking Group has received various notices and requests

for information from its regulators as part of both industry-wide and Banking Group specific reviews, and has also made disclosures to its regulators at

its own instigation. There may be exposures to customers which are additional to any regulatory exposures. These could include class actions,

individual claims or customer remediation or compensation activities. The outcomes and total costs associated with such reviews and possible

exposures remain uncertain.



















55

ANZ BANK NEW ZEALAND LIMITED 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


28. COMPENSATION OF AUDITORS


2018 2017

NZ$000 NZ$000

KPMG New Zealand

Audit or review of financial statements

1


2,199

2,227

Audit related services:



Prudential and regulatory services

2


212

225

Offer documents assurance or review

104

146

Other assurance services

3


36

95

Total audit related services 352 466

Total compensation of auditors relating to the Banking Group 2,551 2,693




Fees relating to certain managed funds and not recharged

4


45

46

Total compensation of auditors 2,596

2,739

1

Includes fees for both the audit of the annual financial statements and reviews of interim financial statements.

2

Includes fees for reviews and controls reports required by regulations.

3

Includes fees for Trustee reporting, reviews and other agreed upon procedures engagements.

4

Amounts relate to the ANZ PIE Fund and certain other funds, and include fees for audits of annual financial statements, controls report and other agreed upon procedures engagements.


The Banking Group’s Policy allows KPMG to provide assurance and other audit related services that, while outside the scope of the statutory audit, are

consistent with the role of an external auditor. The Policy allows certain non-audit services to be provided where the service would not contravene

auditor independence requirements. KPMG may not provide services that are perceived to be in conflict with the role of the external auditor or breach

auditor independence. These include consulting advice and subcontracting of operational activities normally undertaken by management, and

engagements where the external auditor may ultimately be required to express an opinion on its own work.





56

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

































This page has been left blank intentionally































57





REGISTERED BANK

DISCLOSURES




This section contains the additional disclosures required by the

Registered Bank Disclosure Statements (New Zealand Incorporated Registered Banks) Order 2014.







Section Order reference Page

B1. General Disclosures Schedule 2 59

B2. Additional Financial Disclosures Schedule 4 68

B3. Asset Quality Schedule 7 69

B4. Capital Adequacy under the Internal Models Based Approach, Schedule 11 70

and Regulatory Liquidity Ratios

B5. Concentration of Credit Exposures to Individual Counterparties Schedule 13 75

B6. Credit Exposures to Connected Parties Schedule 14 76

B7. Insurance Business, Securitisation, Funds Management, other Fiduciary Activities, Schedule 15 77

and marketing and distribution of Insurance Products

B8. Risk Management Policies Schedule 17 79






58

REGISTERED BANK DISCLOSURES



B1. GENERAL DISCLOSURES

Details of ultimate parent bank and ultimate holding company

The ultimate parent bank and ultimate holding company of the Bank is Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited (Ultimate Parent Bank). The

address for service of the Ultimate Parent Bank is ANZ Centre, Melbourne, Level 9, 833 Collins Street, Docklands, Victoria 3008, Australia.

Restrictions on the Ultimate Parent Bank’s ability to provide financial support

Effect of APRA’s Prudential Standards

APRA Prudential Standard APS 222 Associations with Related Entities (APS 222) sets minimum requirements for authorised deposit-taking institutions in

Australia (ADIs), including the Ultimate Parent Bank, in relation to the monitoring, management and control of risks which arise from associations with

related entities and also includes prudential limits on intra-group exposures.

Under APS222, the Ultimate Parent Bank’s ability to provide financial support to the Bank is subject to certain restrictions:

• the Ultimate Parent Bank should not undertake any third party dealings with the prime purpose of supporting the business of the Bank.

• the Ultimate Parent Bank must not hold unlimited exposures (i.e. should be limited as to specified time and amount) in the Bank (e.g. not

provide a general guarantee covering any of the Bank’s obligations).

• the Ultimate Parent Bank must not enter into cross-default clauses whereby a default by the Bank on an obligation (whether financial or

otherwise) is deemed to trigger a default by the Ultimate Parent Bank on its obligations.

• the level of exposure of the Ultimate Parent Bank’s Level 1 total capital base to the Bank should not exceed: (A) 50% on an individual exposure

basis; or (B) 150% in aggregate (being exposures to all similar regulated entities related to the Ultimate Parent Bank).

In addition, APRA confirmed that by 1 January 2021, no more than 5% of the Ultimate Parent Bank’s Level 1 Tier 1 capital base can comprise non-

equity exposures to its New Zealand operations (its New Zealand branch and the Bank) during ordinary times. This limit does not include holdings of

capital instruments or eligible secured contingent funding support provided to the Bank during times of financial stress.

APRA also confirmed that contingent funding support by the Ultimate Parent Bank to the Bank during times of financial stress must be provided on

terms that are acceptable to APRA and that the Ultimate Parent Bank’s exposures to its New Zealand operations must not exceed 50% of the Ultimate

Parent Bank’s Level 1 Tier 1 capital base. At present, only covered bonds meet APRA’s criteria for contingent funding.

In July 2018, APRA released a consultation paper and draft prudential standards on proposed revisions to APS222, which also incorporated changes to

its large exposures framework published in December 2017. APRA’s proposals include revisions to the prudential limits on exposures to related

entities. APRA is proposing to align the capital base used in limit calculations to Level 1 Tier 1 Capital (capital base used in the revised large exposures

framework) and to reduce the individual and aggregate limits of exposures to individual related ADIs. APRA is currently consulting on the proposed

changes, taking into account submissions already received from the Ultimate Parent Bank and the industry. The impact on the Overseas Banking

Group (including ANZ New Zealand) arising from the above consultation will not be known until APRA finalises its review. APRA intends to have the

revised APS222 framework implemented by 1 January 2020.

Effect of the Level 3 framework

Under APRA’s Level 3 Conglomerates regulations, the Ultimate Parent Bank must limit its financial and operational exposures to subsidiaries (including

the Bank). These requirements are not expected to place additional restrictions on the Ultimate Parent Bank’s ability to provide financial or operational

support to the Bank.

Other APRA powers

The Ultimate Parent Bank may not provide financial support in breach of the Australian Banking Act 1959 (the Banking Act). Under the Banking Act:

• APRA must exercise its powers and functions for the protection of a bank’s depositors in Australia and for the promotion of financial system

stability in Australia; and

• in the event of a bank becoming unable to meet its obligations or suspending payment, the assets of the bank in Australia will be available to

meet that bank’s deposit liabilities in Australia in priority to all other liabilities of the bank.

The requirements of the Banking Act and the exercise by APRA of its powers have the potential to impact the management of the liquidity of the

Bank.

Interest in 5% or more of voting securities of the Bank

The Immediate Parent Company holds 100% of the voting securities of the Bank. The Immediate Parent Company has the direct ability to appoint

100% of the directors of the Bank, subject to RBNZ advising that is has no objection to the appointment in accordance with the Bank’s conditions of

registration. RBNZ also has the power under section 113B of the Reserve Bank of New Zealand Act 1989, after obtaining the consent of the Minister of

Finance, to remove, replace, or appoint directors in certain circumstances.

Priority of creditors’ claims

In the event that the Bank was put into liquidation or ceased to trade, claims of secured creditors and those creditors set out in Schedule 7 of the

Companies Act 1993 would rank ahead of the claims of unsecured creditors. Customer deposits, except UDC Secured Investments, are unsecured and

rank equally with other unsecured liabilities of the Bank, and such liabilities rank ahead of any subordinated instruments issued by the Bank.

Guarantees

The Bank has guaranteed the payment of in terest and principal of covered bonds issued by its subsidiary ANZ New Zealand (Int’l) Limited. This

obligation is guaranteed by ANZNZ Covered Bond Trust Limited (the Covered Bond Guarantor), solely in its capacity as trustee of ANZNZ Covered

Bond Trust. The Covered Bond Guarantor’s address for service is Level 9, 34 Shortland Street, Auckland, New Zealand. The Covered Bond Guarantor is

not a member of the Banking Group and has no credit ratings applicable to its long term senior unsecured obligations. The covered bonds have been

assigned a long term rating of Aaa and AAA by Moody’s Investors Service and Fitch Ratings respectively. Refer to page 26 for further details, and to

page 43 for the amount of assets of the ANZ Covered Bond Trust pledged as security for covered bonds.


No other material obligations of the Bank are guaranteed as at 15 November 2018.




59

ANZ BANK NEW ZEALAND LIMITED 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

REGISTERED BANK DISCLOSURES


B1. GENERAL DISCLOSURES (continued)

Directors

Any document or communication may be sent to any Director at the Registered Office. The document or communication should be marked for the

attention of that Director.



Rt Hon Sir John Key, GNZM AC David Hisco Antony Carter

Position

Independent Non-Executive Director

and Chair

Chief Executive Officer and Director Independent Non-Executive Director

Occupation

Company Director Chief Executive Officer New Zealand and

Group Executive

Company Director


Qualifications

BCom, DCom (Honoris Causa) BBus, MBA BE (Hons), ME, FNZIM

Resides

Auckland, New Zealand Auckland, New Zealand Auckland, New Zealand

Other company

directorships

Air New Zealand Ltd, Australia and New

Zealand Banking Group Ltd, Thirty Eight

JK Ltd

None Air New Zealand Ltd, Avonhead Mall Ltd,

Blues Management Ltd, Fisher & Paykel

Healthcare Corporation Ltd, Fisher &

Paykel Healthcare Employee Share

Purchase Trustee Ltd, Fletcher Building

Ltd, Fletcher Building Industries Ltd,

Loughborough Investments Ltd,

Modern Merchants Ltd, Strategic

Interchange Ltd, Tetrad Corporation Ltd



Shayne Elliott Michelle Jablko Mark Verbiest

Position

Non-Executive Director Non-Executive Director Independent Non-Executive Director

Occupation

Chief Executive Officer, Australia and

New Zealand Banking Group Ltd

Chief Financial Officer, Australia and

New Zealand Banking Group Ltd

Company Director

Qualifications

BCom LLB (Hons), B.Ec (Hons) LLB, CFInstD

Resides

Melbourne, Australia Melbourne, Australia Wanaka, New Zealand

Other company

directorships

Australia and New Zealand Banking

Group Ltd, Financial Markets Foundation

for Children

ANZ Holdings (New Zealand) Ltd Bear Fund NZ Ltd, Freightways Ltd, Willis

Bond Capital Partners Ltd, Willis Bond

General Partner Ltd, MyCare Ltd,

Meridian Energy Ltd



Joan Withers

Position

Independent Non-Executive Director

Occupation

Company Director

Qualifications

MBA, AFInstD

Resides

Auckland, New Zealand

Other company

directorships

Mercury NZ Ltd, On Being Bold Ltd,

The Warehouse Group Ltd,

The Warehouse Planit Trustees Ltd,

The Warehouse Management Trustee

Company Ltd, The Warehouse

Management Trustee Company No.2 Ltd





60

REGISTERED BANK DISCLOSURES



B1. GENERAL DISCLOSURES (continued)

Transactions with Directors

No Director has disclosed that he/she or any immediate relative or professional associate has any dealing with the Banking Group which has been

either entered into on terms other than those which would in the ordinary course of business be given to any other person of like circumstances or

means or which could otherwise be reasonably likely to influence materially the exercise of the Director’s duties as a Director of the Bank.

Board Audit Committee

There is a board Audit Committee which covers audit matters. The committee comprises four directors, all of whom are independent directors.

Policy of the board of directors for avoiding or dealing with conflicts of interest

In order to ensure that members of the Board are reminded of their disclosure obligations under the Companies Act 1993, the following procedures

are adopted:

• at least once in each year, Directors are requested to complete, in terms of section 140(1) of the Companies Act 1993, a disclosure of any

interests which they have with the Bank itself. Directors are reminded at this time of their obligation under the Companies Act 1993 to disclose

promptly any transaction or proposed transaction with the Bank in which they have an interest.

• Directors are also requested to make a general disclosure of their interest in other entities in terms of section 140(2) of the Companies Act 1993.

In addition, they are requested to initiate a review of that disclosure if there are any significant alterations which occur subsequently during the

period.

In addition to the written disclosures referred to above, Directors disclose relevant interests which they have before discussion of particular business

items.

The Companies Act 1993 allows a Director with an interest in a transaction to participate in discussions and to vote on all matters relating to that

particular transaction. However, the Board has adopted a guideline whereby a Director with an interest in a transaction should not be present during

any discussions, and should not vote, on any matter pertaining to that particular transaction.

Auditors

KPMG, 18 Viaduct Harbour Avenue, Auckland, New Zealand.

Conditions of registration

The following conditions of registration were applicable as at 30 September 2018, and have applied from 1 January 2018.


The registration of ANZ Bank New Zealand Limited (“the bank”) as a registered bank is subject to the following conditions:


1. That—

(a) the Total capital ratio of the banking group is not less than 8%;

(b) the Tier 1 capital ratio of the banking group is not less than 6%;

(c) the Common Equity Tier 1 capital ratio of the banking group is not less than 4.5%;

(d) the Total capital of the banking group is not less than $30 million;

(e) the bank must not include the amount of an Additional Tier 1 capital instrument or Tier 2 capital instrument issued after 1 January 2013 in the calculation of

its capital ratios unless it has received a notice of non-objection to the instrument from the Reserve Bank; and

(f) the bank meets the requirements of Part 3 of the Reserve Bank of New Zealand document: “Application requirements for capital recognition or repayment

and notification requirements in respect of capital” (BS16) dated November 2015 in respect of regulatory capital instruments.

For the purposes of this condition of registration, —

the scalar referred to in the Reserve Bank of New Zealand document “Capital Adequacy Framework (Internal Models Based Approach)” (BS2B) dated November

2015 is 1.06.

“Total capital ratio”, “Tier 1 capital ratio”, “Common Equity Tier 1 capital ratio”, and “Total capital” must be calculated in accordance with the Reserve Bank of New

Zealand document “Capital Adequacy Framework (Internal Models Based Approach)” (BS2B) dated November 2015;

an Additional Tier 1 capital instrument is an instrument that meets the requirements of subsection 2.13(a) or (c) of the Reserve Bank of New Zealand document

“Capital Adequacy Framework (Internal Models Based Approach)” (BS2B) dated November 2015.

a Tier 2 capital instrument is an instrument that meets the requirements of subsection 2.16(a) or (c) of the Reserve Bank of New Zealand document “Capital

Adequacy Framework (Internal Models Based Approach)” (BS2B) dated November 2015.

1A. That—

(a) the bank has an internal capital adequacy assessment process (“ICAAP”) that accords with the requirements set out in the document “Guidelines on a bank’s

internal capital adequacy assessment process (‘ICAAP’)” (BS12) dated December 2007;

(b) under its ICAAP the bank identifies and measures its “other material risks” defined as all material risks of the banking group that are not explicitly captured in

the calculation of the Common Equity Tier 1 capital ratio, the Tier 1 capital ratio and the Total capital ratio under the requirements set out in the document

“Capital Adequacy Framework (Internal Models Based Approach)” (BS2B) dated November 2015; and

(c) the bank determines an internal capital allocation for each identified and measured “other material risk”.

1B. That the banking group complies with all requirements set out in the Reserve Bank of New Zealand document “Capital Adequacy Framework (Internal Models

Based Approach)” (BS2B) dated November 2015.






61

ANZ BANK NEW ZEALAND LIMITED 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

REGISTERED BANK DISCLOSURES


B1. GENERAL DISCLOSURES (continued)

1C. That, if the buffer ratio of the banking group is 2.5% or less, the bank must:

(a) according to the following table, limit the aggregate distributions of the bank’s earnings to the percentage limit to distributions that corresponds to the

banking group’s buffer ratio:



Banking group's

buffer ratio

Percentage limit to

distributions of the

bank's earnings


0% - 0.625% 0%


>0.625 - 1.25% 20%


>1.25 - 1.875% 40%


>1.875% - 2.5% 60%



(b) prepare a capital plan to restore the banking group’s buffer ratio to above 2.5% within any timeframe determined by the Reserve Bank for restoring the buffer

ratio; and

(c) have the capital plan approved by the Reserve Bank.

For the purposes of this condition of registration, —

“buffer ratio”, “distributions”, and “earnings” have the same meaning as in Part 3 of the Reserve Bank of New Zealand document: “Capital Adequacy Framework

(Internal Models Based Approach)” (BS2B) dated November 2015.

the scalar referred to in the Reserve Bank of New Zealand document “Capital Adequacy Framework (Internal Models Based Approach)” (BS2B) dated November

2015 is 1.06.

2. That the banking group does not conduct any non-financial activities that in aggregate are material relative to its total activities.

In this condition of registration, the meaning of “material” is based on generally accepted accounting practice.

3. That the banking group’s insurance business is not greater than 1% of its total consolidated assets.

For the purposes of this condition of registration, the banking group’s insurance business is the sum of the following amounts for entities in the banking group:

(a) if the business of an entity predominantly consists of insurance business and the entity is not a subsidiary of another entity in the banking group whose

business predominantly consists of insurance business, the amount of the insurance business to sum is the total consolidated assets of the group headed by

the entity; and

(b) if the entity conducts insurance business and its business does not predominantly consist of insurance business and the entity is not a subsidiary of another

entity in the banking group whose business predominantly consists of insurance business, the amount of the insurance business to sum is the total liabilities

relating to the entity’s insurance business plus the equity retained by the entity to meet the solvency or financial soundness needs of its insurance business.

In determining the total amount of the banking group’s insurance business-

(a) all amounts must relate to on balance sheet items only, and must comply with generally accepted accounting practice; and

(b) if products or assets of which an insurance business is comprised also contain a non-insurance component, the whole of such products or assets must be

considered part of the insurance business.

For the purposes of this condition of registration,-

“insurance business” means the undertaking or assumption of liability as an insurer under a contract of insurance:

“insurer” and “contract of insurance” have the same meaning as provided in sections 6 and 7 of the Insurance (Prudential Supervision) Act 2010.

4. That the aggregate credit exposures (of a non-capital nature and net of any allowances for impairment) of the banking group to all connected persons do not

exceed the rating-contingent limit outlined in the following matrix:



Credit Rating of the bank

1


Connected exposure limit

(% of the banking group’s Tier 1

capital)


AA/Aa2 and above 75


AA-/Aa3 70


A+/A1 60


A/A2 40


A-/A3 30


BBB+/Baa1 and below 15



1

This table uses the rating scales of Standard & Poor’s, Fitch Ratings and Moody’s Investors Service. (Fitch Ratings’ scale is identical to Standard & Poor’s)


Within the rating-contingent limit, credit exposures (of a non-capital nature and net of any allowances for impairment) to non-bank connected persons shall not

exceed 15 percent of the banking group’s Tier 1 capital.

For the purposes of this condition of registration, compliance with the rating-contingent connected exposure limit is determined in accordance with the Reserve

Bank of New Zealand document entitled “Connected Exposures Policy” (BS8) dated November 2015.

5. That exposures to connected persons are not on more favourable terms (e.g. as relates to such matters as credit assessment, tenor, interest rates, amortisation

schedules and requirement for collateral) than corresponding exposures to non-connected persons.






62

REGISTERED BANK DISCLOSURES



B1. GENERAL DISCLOSURES (continued)

6. That the bank complies with the following corporate governance requirements:

(a) the board of the bank must have at least five directors;

(b) the majority of the board members must be non-executive directors;

(c) at least half of the board members must be independent directors;

(d) an alternate director,—

(i) for a non-executive director must be non-executive; and

(ii) for an independent director must be independent;

(e) at least half of the independent directors of the bank must be ordinarily resident in New Zealand;

(f) the chairperson of the board of the bank must be independent; and

(g) the bank’s constitution must not include any provision permitting a director, when exercising powers or performing duties as a director, to act other than in

what he or she believes is the best interests of the company (i.e. the bank).

For the purposes of this condition of registration, “non-executive” and “independent” have the same meaning as in the Reserve Bank of New Zealand document

entitled “Corporate Governance” (BS14) dated July 2014.

7. That no appointment of any director, chief executive officer, or executive who reports or is accountable directly to the chief executive officer, is made in respect of

the bank unless:

(a) the Reserve Bank has been supplied with a copy of the curriculum vitae of the proposed appointee; and

(b) the Reserve Bank has advised that it has no objection to that appointment.

8. That a person must not be appointed as chairperson of the board of the bank unless:

(a) the Reserve Bank has been supplied with a copy of the curriculum vitae of the proposed appointee; and

(b) the Reserve Bank has advised that it has no objection to that appointment.

9. That the bank has a board audit committee, or other separate board committee covering audit matters, that meets the following requirements:

(a) the mandate of the committee must include: ensuring the integrity of the bank’s financial controls, reporting systems and internal audit standards;

(b) the committee must have at least three members;

(c) every member of the committee must be a non-executive director of the bank;

(d) the majority of the members of the committee must be independent; and

(e) the chairperson of the committee must be independent and must not be the chairperson of the bank.

For the purposes of this condition of registration, “non-executive” and “independent” have the same meaning as in the Reserve Bank of New Zealand document

entitled “Corporate Governance” (BS14) dated July 2014.

10. That a substantial proportion of the bank’s business is conducted in and from New Zealand.

11. That the bank has legal and practical ability to control and execute any business, and any functions relating to any business, of the bank that are carried on by a

person other than the bank, sufficient to achieve, under normal business conditions and in the event of stress or failure of the bank or of a service provider to the

bank, the following outcomes:

(a) that the bank’s clearing and settlement obligations due on a day can be met on that day;

(b) that the bank’s financial risk positions on a day can be identified on that day;

(c) that the bank’s financial risk positions can be monitored and managed on the day following any failure and on subsequent days; and

(d) that the bank’s existing customers can be given access to payments facilities on the day following any failure and on subsequent days.

This condition ceases to apply in respect of an existing outsourcing arrangement on the earlier of either 1 October 2022 or when the existing outsourcing

arrangement becomes compliant with condition 24, from which point in time condition 24 will apply to that outsourcing arrangement.

For the purposes of this condition of registration:

(a) the term “legal and practical ability to control and execute” is explained in the Reserve Bank of New Zealand document entitled “Outsourcing Policy” (BS11)

dated January 2006; and

(b) the term “existing outsourcing arrangement” is defined in the Reserve Bank of New Zealand document entitled “Outsourcing Policy (BS11)” dated September

2017.

12. That:

(a) the business and affairs of the bank are managed by, or under the direction or supervision of, the board of the bank;

(b) the employment contract of the chief executive officer of the bank or person in an equivalent position (together “CEO”) is with the bank, and the terms and

conditions of the CEO’s employment agreement are determined by, and any decisions relating to the employment or termination of employment of the CEO

are made by, the board of the bank; and

(c) all staff employed by the bank shall have their remuneration determined by (or under the delegated authority of) the board or the CEO of the bank and be

accountable (directly or indirectly) to the CEO of the bank.








63

ANZ BANK NEW ZEALAND LIMITED 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

REGISTERED BANK DISCLOSURES


B1. GENERAL DISCLOSURES (continued)

13. That the banking group complies with the following quantitative requirements for liquidity-risk management:

(a) the one-week mismatch ratio of the banking group is not less than zero per cent at the end of each business day;

(b) the one-month mismatch ratio of the banking group is not less than zero per cent at the end of each business day; and

(c) the one-year core funding ratio of the banking group is not less than 75 per cent at the end of each business day.

For the purposes of this condition of registration, the ratios identified must be calculated in accordance with the Reserve Bank of New Zealand documents entitled

“Liquidity Policy” (BS13) dated January 2018 and “Liquidity Policy Annex: Liquid Assets” (BS13A) dated December 2011.

14. That the bank has an internal framework for liquidity risk management that is adequate in the bank’s view for managing the bank’s liquidity risk at a prudent level,

and that, in particular:

(a) is clearly documented and communicated to all those in the organisation with responsibility for managing liquidity and liquidity risk;

(b) identifies responsibility for approval, oversight and implementation of the framework and policies for liquidity risk management;

(c) identifies the principal methods that the bank will use for measuring, monitoring and controlling liquidity risk; and

(d) considers the material sources of stress that the bank might face, and prepares the bank to manage stress through a contingency funding plan.

15. That no more than 10% of total assets may be beneficially owned by a SPV.

For the purposes of this condition, —

“total assets” means all assets of the banking group plus any assets held by any SPV that are not included in the banking group’s assets:

“SPV” means a person—

(a) to whom any member of the banking group has sold, assigned, or otherwise transferred any asset;

(b) who has granted, or may grant, a security interest in its assets for the benefit of any holder of any covered bond; and

(c) who carries on no other business except for that necessary or incidental to guarantee the obligations of any member of the banking group under a covered

bond:

“covered bond” means a debt security issued by any member of the banking group, for which repayment to holders is guaranteed by a SPV, and investors retain an

unsecured claim on the issuer.

16. That—

(a) no member of the banking group may give effect to a qualifying acquisition or business combination that meets the notification threshold, and does not

meet the non-objection threshold, unless:

(i) the bank has notified the Reserve Bank in writing of the intended acquisition or business combination and at least 10 working days have passed; and

(ii) at the time of notifying the Reserve Bank of the intended acquisition or business combination, the bank provided the Reserve Bank with the information

required under the Reserve Bank of New Zealand Banking Supervision Handbook document “Significant Acquisitions Policy” (BS15) dated December

2011; and

(b) no member of the banking group may give effect to a qualifying acquisition or business combination that meets the non-objection threshold unless:

(i) the bank has notified the Reserve Bank in writing of the intended acquisition or business combination;

(ii) at the time of notifying the Reserve Bank of the intended acquisition or business combination, the bank provided the Reserve Bank with the information

required under the Reserve Bank of New Zealand Banking Supervision Handbook document “Significant Acquisitions Policy” (BS15) dated December

2011; and

(iii) the Reserve Bank has given the bank a notice of non-objection to the significant acquisition or business combination.

For the purposes of this condition of registration, “qualifying acquisition or business combination”, “notification threshold” and “non-objection threshold” have the

same meaning as in the Reserve Bank of New Zealand Banking Supervision Handbook document “Significant Acquisitions Policy” (BS15) dated December 2011.

17. That the bank is pre-positioned for Open Bank Resolution and in accordance with a direction from the Reserve Bank, the bank can—

(a) close promptly at any time of the day and on any day of the week and that effective upon the appointment of the statutory manager—

(i) all liabilities are frozen in full; and

(ii) no further access by customers and counterparties to their accounts (deposits, liabilities or other obligations) is possible;

(b) apply a de minimis to relevant customer liability accounts;

(c) apply a partial freeze to the customer liability account balances;

(d) reopen by no later than 9am the next business day following the appointment of a statutory manager and provide customers access to their unfrozen funds;

(e) maintain a full freeze on liabilities not pre-positioned for open bank resolution; and

(f) reinstate customers’ access to some or all of their residual frozen funds.

For the purposes of this condition of registration, “de minimis”, “partial freeze”, “customer liability account”, and “frozen and unfrozen funds” have the same meaning

as in the Reserve Bank of New Zealand document “Open Bank Resolution (OBR) Pre-positioning Requirements Policy” (BS17) dated September 2013.









64

REGISTERED BANK DISCLOSURES



B1. GENERAL DISCLOSURES (continued)

18. That the bank has an Implementation Plan that—

(a) is up-to-date; and

(b) demonstrates that the bank’s prepositioning for Open Bank Resolution meets the requirements set out in the Reserve Bank document: “Open Bank Resolution

Pre-positioning Requirements Policy” (BS17) dated September 2013.

For the purposes of this condition of registration, “Implementation Plan” has the same meaning as in the Reserve Bank of New Zealand document “Open Bank

Resolution (OBR) Pre-positioning Requirements Policy” (BS17) dated September 2013.

19. That the bank has a compendium of liabilities that—

(a) at the product-class level lists all liabilities, indicating which are—

(i) pre-positioned for Open Bank Resolution; and

(ii) not pre-positioned for Open Bank Resolution;

(b) is agreed to by the Reserve Bank; and

(c) if the Reserve Bank’s agreement is conditional, meets the Reserve Bank’s conditions.

For the purposes of this condition of registration, “compendium of liabilities” and “pre-positioned and non pre-positioned liabilities” have the same meaning as in

the Reserve Bank of New Zealand document “Open Bank Resolution (OBR) Pre-positioning Requirements Policy” (BS17) dated September 2013.

20. That on an annual basis the bank tests all the component parts of its Open Bank Resolution solution that demonstrates the bank’s prepositioning for Open Bank

Resolution as specified in the bank’s Implementation Plan.

For the purposes of this condition of registration, “Implementation Plan” has the same meaning as in the Reserve Bank of New Zealand document “Open Bank

Resolution (OBR) Pre-positioning Requirements Policy” (BS17) dated September 2013.

21. That, for a loan-to-valuation measurement period, the total of the bank’s qualifying new mortgage lending amount in respect of property-investment residential

loans with a loan-to-valuation ratio of more than 65%, must not exceed 5% of the total of the qualifying new mortgage lending amount in respect of property-

investment residential mortgage loans arising in the loan-to-valuation measurement period.

22. That, for a loan-to-valuation measurement period, the total of the bank’s qualifying new mortgage lending amount in respect of non property-investment

residential loans with a loan-to-valuation ratio of more than 80%, must not exceed 15% of the total of the qualifying new mortgage lending amount in respect of

non property-investment residential mortgage loans arising in the loan-to-valuation measurement period.

23. That the bank must not make a residential mortgage loan unless the terms and conditions of the loan contract or the terms and conditions for an associated

mortgage require that a borrower obtain the registered bank’s agreement before the borrower can grant to another person a charge over the residential property

used as security for the loan.

24. That the bank must comply with the Reserve Bank of New Zealand document “Outsourcing Policy” (BS11) dated September 2017.

In these conditions of registration,—

“banking group” means ANZ Bank New Zealand Limited (as reporting entity) and all other entities included in the group as defined in section 6(1) of the Financial

Markets Conduct Act 2013 for the purposes of Part 7 of that Act.

“generally accepted accounting practice” has the same meaning as in section 8 of the Financial Reporting Act 2013.

In conditions of registration 21 to 23, —

“loan-to-valuation ratio”, “non property-investment residential mortgage loan”, “property-investment residential mortgage loan”, “qualifying new mortgage lending

amount in respect of property-investment residential mortgage loans”, “qualifying new mortgage lending amount in respect of non property-investment

residential mortgage loans” and “residential mortgage loan” have the same meaning as in the Reserve Bank of New Zealand document entitled “Framework for

Restrictions on High-LVR Residential Mortgage Lending” (BS19) dated January 2018:

“loan-to-valuation measurement period” means—

(a) the six calendar month period ending on the last day of March 2018; and

(b) thereafter a period of three calendar months ending on the last day of the third calendar month, the first of which ends on the last day of April 2018.


Non-compliance with conditions of registration

During the year ended 30 September 2018, the Bank sought clarification from RBNZ as to the treatment of commitments jointly held with the

Ultimate Parent Bank in the risk weighted exposures for the Banking Group for capital adequacy purposes. RBNZ subsequently confirmed that those

parts of the commitments that are not allocated to the Banking Group, but could become allocated to the Banking Group at the customer’s request

should be included in the Banking Group’s calculation of risk weighted exposures. As a result, the Bank had not complied with Condition of

Registration 1 and Condition of Registration 1B for a period of time. These commitments are included in the Banking Group’s risk weighted exposures

as at 30 September 2018, and the Bank was in full compliance with its Conditions of Registration as at that date. The Banking Group's capital ratios

were not materially affected as a result of the non-compliance. As at 30 September 2018, the Banking Group’s Tier 1 capital ratio decreased by 13 basis

points to 14.4% and it had a NZ$58 million increase in its minimum capital requirement as a result of including these commitments in its risk weighted

exposures. The Bank proactively brought this matter

to the attention of RBNZ, who have acknowledged that no further action is warranted on the part

of RBNZ.










65

ANZ BANK NEW ZEALAND LIMITED 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

REGISTERED BANK DISCLOSURES


B1. GENERAL DISCLOSURES (continued)

Pending proceedings or arbitration

A description of any pending legal proceedings or arbitration concerning any member of the Banking Group that may have a material adverse effect

on the Bank or the Banking Group is included in Note 27 Commitments and Contingent Liabilities.

Credit rating

As at 15 November 2018 the Bank has three credit ratings, which are applicable to its long-term senior unsecured obligations which are payable in

New Zealand in New Zealand dollars. On 19 June 2017, Moody’s Investors Service downgraded the Bank’s credit rating from Aa3 to A1 and changed

the outlook on the Bank from Negative to Stable.

The Bank’s credit ratings are:

Rating Agency Credit Rating Qualification

S&P Global Ratings

AA- Outlook Negative

Fitch Ratings

AA- Outlook Stable

Moody’s Investors Service

A1 Outlook Stable


The following table describes the credit rating grades available:


S&P Global

Ratings

Moody's

Investors

Service

Fitch

Ratings

The following grades display investment grade characteristics:

Ability to repay principal and interest is extremely strong. This is the highest investment category. AAA Aaa AAA

Very strong ability to repay principal and interest. AA Aa AA

Strong ability to repay principal and interest although somewhat susceptible to adverse changes in economic, business

or financial conditions.

A A A

Adequate ability to repay principal and interest. More vulnerable to adverse changes.

BBB Baa BBB

The following grades have predominantly speculative characteristics:

Significant uncertainties exist which could affect the payment of principal and interest on a timely basis.

BB Ba BB

Greater vulnerability and therefore greater likelihood of default.

B B B

Likelihood of default now considered high. Timely repayment of principal and interest is dependent on favourable

financial conditions.

CCC Caa CCC

Highest risk of default. CC to C Ca to C CC to C

Obligations currently in default.

D - RD & D


Credit ratings from S&P Global Ratings and Fitch Ratings may be modified by the addition of "+" or "-" to show the relative standing within the “AA” to “B” categories. Moody's Investors Service

applies numerical modifiers 1, 2, and 3 to each of the “Aa” to “Caa” classifications, with 1 indicating the higher end and 3 the lower end of the rating category.


























66

REGISTERED BANK DISCLOSURES



B1. GENERAL DISCLOSURES (continued)

Historical summary of financial statements



2018 2017 2016 2015 2014

Income Statement NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m

Interest income

6,390

6,198 6,423 6,926 6,272

Interest expense

(3,240)

(3,161) (3,421) (4,051) (3,529)

Net interest income

3,150

3,037 3,002 2,875 2,743

Non-interest income 1,126 938 852 1,175 1,085

Operating income 4,276 3,975 3,854 4,050 3,828

Operating expenses (1,517) (1,468) (1,599) (1,512) (1,489)

Credit impairment (charge) / release

(55)

(62) (150) (74) 16

Profit before income tax 2,704

2,445 2,105 2,464 2,355

Income tax expense

(751)

(680) (570) (681) (639)

Profit after income tax 1,953

1,765 1,535 1,783 1,716


Dividends paid (4,611) (1,695) (1,363) (1,760) (2,353)

Share capital issued 3,000 - - 675 970





Balance Sheet

Total assets

159,012

153,973 160,819 147,527 128,915

Total individually impaired assets

321

357 426 382 634

Total liabilities

145,903

141,192 148,109 135,074 117,134

Equity

13,109

12,781 12,710 12,453 11,781


The amounts included in this summary have been taken from the audited financial statements of the Banking Group.


Directors’ statements

The Directors' statement is included on page 83.

Auditor’s report

The auditor’s report is included on page 84.

Index

The index to the contents of the Disclosure Statement is included on page 2, and an index to the contents of the Financial Statements is included on

page 3.























67

ANZ BANK NEW ZEALAND LIMITED 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

REGISTERED BANK DISCLOSURES


B2. ADDITIONAL FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES

Additional information on the balance sheet


2018 2017



NZ$m NZ$m

Total interest earning and discount bearing assets 145,322 138,795

Total interest and discount bearing liabilities

124,625

119,814

Additional information on interest rate sensitivity

The following tables represent the interest rate sensitivity of the Banking Group's assets, liabilities and off balance sheet instruments by showing the

periods in which these instruments may reprice, that is, when interest rates applicable to each asset or liability can be changed.


Total

Up to

3 months

Over 3 to

6 months

Over 6 to

12 months

Over 1 to

2 years

Over

2 years

Not bearing

interest

2018 NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m

Assets

Cash and cash equivalents 2,200 1,913 - - - - 287

Settlement balances owed to the Banking

Group

656 - - - - - 656

Collateral paid

1,919 1,919 - - - - -

Trading securities

8,024 873 405 492 1,373 4,881 -

Derivative financial instruments

8,086 - - - - - 8,086

Available-for-sale assets

6,502 338 699 42 1,351 4,071 1

Net loans and advances

1

126,466 63,027 10,370 23,835 20,835 8,771 (372)

Other financial assets

1

719 62 55 8 - 2 592

Total financial assets 154,572 68,132 11,529 24,377 23,559 17,725 9,250

Liabilities

Settlement balances owed by the Banking

Group

2,161 750 - - - - 1,411

Collateral received

845 845 - - - - -

Deposits and other borrowings

1


108,008 67,952 12,924 12,444 3,043 1,421 10,224

Derivative financial instruments 8,095 - - - - - 8,095

Debt issuances 25,135 3,979 3,046 757 3,782 13,571 -

Other financial liabilities

1

686 111 - - - - 575

Total financial liabilities 144,930 73,637 15,970 13,201 6,825 14,992 20,305

Hedging instruments - 14,690 1,522 (14,121) (9,146) 7,055 -

Interest sensitivity gap 9,642 9,185 (2,919) (2,945) 7,588 9,788 (11,055)

1

Including items reclassified as held for sale


Reconciliation of mortgage related amounts


As at 30 September 2018


Note NZ$m

Term loans - housing

1

11 78,395

Less: fair value hedging adjustment (10)

Less: housing loans made to corporate customers

(2,224)

Add: unsettled re-purchases of mortgages from the NZ Branch

7

On-balance sheet residential mortgage exposures subject to the IRB approach B4

76,168

Add: off-balance sheet residential mortgage exposures subject to the IRB approach B4

8,232

Total residential mortgage exposures subject to the IRB approach (as per LVR analysis)

B4

84,400

1

Term loans – housing includes loans secured over residential property for owner-occupier, residential property investment and business purposes.










68

REGISTERED BANK DISCLOSURES



B3. ASSET QUALITY

Past due assets

2018 2017


Residential

mortgages

Other retail

exposures

Non-retail

exposures Total

Residential

mortgages

Other retail

exposures

Non-retail

exposures Total


NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m

Less than 30 days past due 595 186 639 1,420 556 187 642 1,385

At least 30 days but less than 60 days past due 109 31 39 179 85 34 171 290

At least 60 days but less than 90 days past due 105 20 3 128 95 18 12 125

At least 90 days past due

152 34 19 205

132 31 19 182

Total past due but not impaired 961 271 700 1,932 868 270 844 1,982


Movement in individually impaired assets

2018 2017


Residential

mortgages

Other retail

exposures

Non-retail

exposures Total

Residential

mortgages

Other retail

exposures

Non-retail

exposures Total

NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m

Balance at beginning of the period

31 20 306 357

57 27 342 426

Additions

21 107 267 395

35 106 430 571

Amounts written off

(1) (77) (71) (149)

(1) (82) (50) (133)

Deletions

(26) (25) (231) (282)

(60) (31) (416) (507)

Balance at end of the period 25 25 271 321 31 20 306 357

Individual provision 21 11 98 130

25 6 121 152


Movement in balances of individual credit impairment allowances


2018 2017


Residential

mortgages

Other retail

exposures

Non-retail

exposures Total

Residential

mortgages

Other retail

exposures

Non-retail

exposures Total

NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m

Balance at beginning of the period

25 6 121 152

37 6 108 151

Individual credit impairment charge / (release)



New and increased provisions

7 90 116 213

5 94 133 232

Write-backs

(9) (8) (66) (83)

(16) (12) (67) (95)

Recoveries of amounts previously written off

- (21) (9) (30)

- (20) (11) (31)

Individual credit impairment charge / (release)

(2) 61 41 100

(11) 62 55 106

Bad debts written off

(1) (77) (71) (149)

(1) (82) (50) (133)

Add back recoveries of amounts previously

written off

- 21 9 30

- 20 11 31

Discount unwind

(1) - (2) (3)

- - (3) (3)

Balance at end of the period 21 11 98 130

25 6 121 152


Movement in balances of collective credit impairment allowances

2018 2017


Residential

mortgages

Other retail

exposures

Non-retail

exposures Total

Residential

mortgages

Other retail

exposures

Non-retail

exposures Total

NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m

Balance at beginning of the period

75 121 231 427

78 130 263 471

Charge / (release) to income statement

7 (3) (49) (45)

(3) (9) (32) (44)

Balance at end of the period 82 118 182 382

75 121 231 427


Asset quality for financial assets designated at fair value

The Banking Group does not have any loans and advances designated at fair value through profit or loss.


Other asset quality information

2018 2017


Residential

mortgages

Other retail

exposures

Non-retail

exposures Total

Residential

mortgages

Other retail

exposures

Non-retail

exposures Total

NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m

Undrawn facilities with impaired customers

- - 14 14

1 - 5 6

Other assets under administration 7 2 - 9 8 2 - 10




69

ANZ BANK NEW ZEALAND LIMITED 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

REGISTERED BANK DISCLOSURES


B4. CAPITAL ADEQUACY UNDER THE INTERNAL MODELS BASED APPROACH, AND REGULATORY

LIQUIDITY RATIOS (UNAUDITED)

RBNZ Basel III capital ratios

Banking Group

Bank

(Solo Consolidated)

RBNZ minimum 2018 2017


2018 2017

Common equity tier 1 capital 4.5% 11.1% 10.7% 9.5% 9.5%

Tier 1 capital 6.0% 14.4% 14.1% 13.0% 13.0%

Total capital 8.0% 14.4% 14.4% 13.0% 13.3%

Buffer ratio 2.5% 6.4% 6.2% n/a n/a


Capital of the Banking Group


As at 30 September 2018 NZ$m

Tier 1 capital

Common equity tier 1 (CET1) capital


Paid up ordinary shares issued by the Bank

11,588

Retained earnings (net of appropriations)

1,188

Accumulated other comprehensive income and other disclosed reserves

33

Less deductions from common equity tier 1 capital


Goodwill and intangible assets, net of associated deferred tax liabilities

(3,381)

Cash flow hedge reserve

(22)

Expected losses to the extent greater than total eligible allowances for impairment

(325)

Common equity tier 1 capital

9,081

Additional tier 1 capital


Preference shares

1

300

NZD 500m ANZ New Zealand Capital Notes (ANZ NZ CN)

2

500

NZD 1,003m ANZ New Zealand Internal Capital Notes (ANZ NZ ICN)

2

1,003

NZD 938m ANZ New Zealand Internal Capital Notes (ANZ NZ ICN2)

2

938

Retained earnings of the Bonus Bonds Scheme

3

55

Less deductions from additional tier 1 capital

Surplus retained earnings of the Bonus Bonds Scheme

3

(20)

Additional tier 1 capital 2,776

Total tier 1 capital

11,857

Tier 2 capital

-

Total capital


11,857

1

Classified as equity on the balance sheet under NZ Generally Accepted Accounting Practice (NZ GAAP).

2

Classified as a liability on the balance sheet under NZ GAAP.

3

Bonus Bonds Scheme is not consolidated on the balance sheet under GAAP but is classified as AT1 capital for capital adequacy purposes as set out in BS2B.


Capital requirements of the Banking Group


Total

exposures

after credit

risk mitigation

Risk

weighted

exposure or

implied risk

weighted

exposure

1


Total capital

requirement

As at 30 September 2018 NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m

Total credit risk

185,616 69,019 5,521

Operational risk

n/a 6,027 482

Market risk

n/a 4,776 382

Agri business supervisory adjustment

n/a 2,325 186

Total


185,616 82,147 6,571

1

The calculation of capital requirements for total credit risk weighted includes a scalar of 1.06 in accordance with the Bank's Conditions of Registration.






70

REGISTERED BANK DISCLOSURES



B4. CAPITAL ADEQUACY UNDER THE INTERNAL MODELS BASED APPROACH, AND REGULATORY

LIQUIDITY RATIOS (UNAUDITED)

(continued)

Credit risk subject to the Internal Ratings Based (IRB) approach



IRB credit exposures by exposure class and customer credit rating


Probability

of default

Exposure at

default

Exposure-

weighted

LGD used

for the

capital

calculation

Exposure-

weighted

risk weight

Risk

weighted

exposure

Total capital

requirement

As at 30 September 2018 % NZ$m % % NZ$m NZ$m

Corporate

0 - 2 0.06 5,757 63 39 2,390 191

3 - 4 0.32 23,866 36 40 10,119 810

5

0.99 12,877 33 58 7,954 636

6

2.27 4,083 33 77 3,314 265

7 - 8

12.86 1,606 38 157 2,666 213

Default

100.00 381 45 163 660 53

Total corporate exposures

1.83 48,570 38 53 27,103 2,168

Sovereign

0 0.01 11,636 5 1 160 13

1 - 8 0.02 680 5 1 10 1

Total sovereign exposures

0.01 12,316 5 1 170 14

Bank

0

0.03 61 65 15 10 1

1

0.03 10,323 57 25 2,748 220

2 - 4

0.12 796 64 41 347 28

5 - 8 4.56 4 48 148 7 -

Total bank exposures 0.04 11,184 58 26 3,112 249

Residential mortgages

0 - 3

0.20 24,424 12 5 1,397 112

4

0.46 34,360 18 15 5,370 430

5

0.92 21,170 23 31 6,963 557

6

1.98 4,504 26 60 2,862 229

7 - 8

4.89 356 27 97 364 29

Default 100.00 220 19 19 42 3

Total residential mortgages exposures 0.85 85,034 18 19 16,998 1,360

Other retail

0 - 2

0.10 561 77 49 294 24

3 - 4

0.27 4,848 78 55 2,805 224

5

1.04 1,941 72 74 1,526 122

6

2.23 1,902 71 90 1,808 145

7 - 8

8.11 1,649 82 128 2,230 178

Default 100.00 80 77 48 42 3

Total other retail exposures 2.64 10,981 76 75 8,705 696

Total credit risk exposures subject to the IRB approach 1.14 168,085 30 31 56,088 4,487


Credit risk exposures subject to the IRB approach have been derived in accordance with Capital Adequacy Framework (Internal Models Based Approach)

(BS2B) and other relevant correspondence with RBNZ setting out prescribed credit risk estimates.











71

ANZ BANK NEW ZEALAND LIMITED 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

REGISTERED BANK DISCLOSURES


B4. CAPITAL ADEQUACY UNDER THE INTERNAL MODELS BASED APPROACH, AND REGULATORY

LIQUIDITY RATIOS (UNAUDITED)

(continued)

IRB credit exposures: On-balance sheet, off-balance sheet and market related contracts


Total

exposure or

principal

amount

Exposure at

default

Exposure-

weighted

LGD used

for the

capital

calculation

Exposure-

weighted

risk weight

Risk

weighted

exposure

Total capital

requirement

As at 30 September 2018 NZ$m NZ$m % % NZ$m NZ$m

On-balance sheet exposures

Corporate

34,724 34,604 33 53 19,298 1,543

Sovereign

12,178 11,855 5 1 120 10

Bank

5,907 5,262 56 19 1,073 86

Residential mortgages

76,168 76,391 19 19 15,761 1,261

Other retail

5,358 5,449 73 93 5,372 429

Total on-balance sheet exposures

134,335 133,561 25 29 41,624 3,329

Off-balance sheet exposures

Corporate

12,154 11,210 48 48 5,684 455

Sovereign

346 313 5 1 2 -

Bank

1,787 1,445 53 18 272 22

Residential mortgages

8,232 8,643 16 14 1,237 99

Other retail

5,514 5,532 79 57 3,333 267

Total off-balance sheet exposures

28,033 27,143 44 37 10,528 843

Market related contracts

Corporate

87,191 2,756 61 73 2,121 170

Sovereign

14,642 148 5 30 48 4

Bank

962,075 4,477 61 37 1,767 141

Total market related contracts

1,063,908 7,381 60 50 3,936 315

Total credit risk exposures subject to the IRB approach 1,226,276 168,085 30 31 56,088 4,487


Other IRB credit exposures




Exposure at

default Risk weight

Risk weighted

exposure

Total capital

requirement

As at 30 September 2018 NZ$m % NZ$m NZ$m

Cash

204 - - -

New Zealand dollar denominated claims on the Crown and RBNZ

1,734 - - -

Other assets

1,502 100 1,592 127

Total other IRB credit risk exposures


3,440 44 1,592 127


Other IRB credit exposures have been calculated in accordance with BS2B.


Additional mortgage information

As required by RBNZ, loan-to-valuation-ratios (LVR) are calculated as the current exposure secured by a residential mortgage divided by the Banking

Group's valuation of the security property at origination of the exposure. Off balance sheet exposures include undrawn and partially drawn residential

mortgage loans as well as commitments to lend. Commitments to lend are formal offers for housing lending which have been accepted by the

customer.


On-balance

sheet

Off-balance

sheet Total

As at 30 September 2018 NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m

LVR range

Does not exceed 60% 37,789 5,565 43,354

Exceeds 60% and not 70% 17,267 1,320 18,587

Exceeds 70% and not 80%

17,234 1,035 18,269

Does not exceed 80%

72,290 7,920 80,210

Exceeds 80% and not 90%

2,617 131 2,748

Exceeds 90%

1,261 181 1,442

Total 76,168 8,232 84,400




72

REGISTERED BANK DISCLOSURES



B4. CAPITAL ADEQUACY UNDER THE INTERNAL MODELS BASED APPROACH, AND REGULATORY

LIQUIDITY RATIOS (UNAUDITED)

(continued)

Specialised lending subject to the slotting approach


Exposure at

default Risk weight

Risk

weighted

exposure

Total capital

requirement

As at 30 September 2018 NZ$m % NZ$m NZ$m

On-balance sheet exposures

Strong

4,594 70 3,408 273

Good

5,735 90 5,472 438

Satisfactory

322 115 393 31

Weak

89 250 234 19

Default

39 - - -

Total on-balance sheet exposures 10,779 83 9,507 761



Exposure

amount

Exposure at

default

Average risk

weight

Risk

weighted

exposure

Total capital

requirement

As at 30 September 2018 NZ$m NZ$m % NZ$m NZ$m

Off-balance sheet exposures

Undrawn commitments and other off balance sheet exposures 1,484 1,302 82 1,135 91

Market related contracts 2,006 102 130 141 11

Total off-balance sheet exposures 3,490 1,404 86 1,276 102


Specialised lending exposures subject to the slotting approach have been calculated in accordance with BS2B.


The supervisory categories of specialised lending above are associated with specific risk-weights. These categories broadly correspond to the

following external credit assessments using S&P Global Ratings' rating scale, Strong: BBB- or better, Good: BB+ or BB, Satisfactory: BB- or B+ and Weak:

B to C-.


Credit risk exposures subject to the standardised approach


Exposure at

default Risk weight

Risk

weighted

exposure

Total capital

requirement

As at 30 September 2018


NZ$m % NZ$m NZ$m

On-balance sheet exposures



Corporates

130 76 105 8

Default

1 150 1 -

Total on-balance sheet exposures 131 77 106 8



Exposure

amount

Average

credit

conversion

factor

Exposure at

default

Average risk

weight

Risk

weighted

exposure

Total capital

requirement

As at 30 September 2018 NZ$m % NZ$m % NZ$m NZ$m

Off-balance sheet exposures

Total off balance sheet exposures subject to the standardised

approach

588 60 352 97 361 29

Market related contracts 222,026 1 1,418 4 61 5


Credit exposures subject to the standardised approach have been calculated in accordance with BS2A.


Equity exposures


Exposure at

default Risk weight

Risk

weighted

exposure

Total capital

requirement

As at 30 September 2018 NZ$m % NZ$m NZ$m

All equity holdings not deducted from capital

7 400 28 2


Equity exposures have been calculated in accordance with BS2B.




73

ANZ BANK NEW ZEALAND LIMITED 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

REGISTERED BANK DISCLOSURES


B4. CAPITAL ADEQUACY UNDER THE INTERNAL MODELS BASED APPROACH, AND REGULATORY

LIQUIDITY RATIOS (UNAUDITED)

(continued)

Credit risk mitigation

As at 30 September 2018, under the IRB approach, the Banking Group had NZ$912 million of Corporate exposures covered by guarantees where the

presence of the guarantees was judged to reduce the underlying credit risk of the exposures. Information on the total value of exposures covered by

financial guarantees and eligible financial collateral is not disclosed, as the effect of these guarantees and collateral on the underlying credit risk

exposures is not considered to be material.

Operational risk

The Banking Group uses the Advanced Measurement Approach for determining its regulatory capital requirement for operational risk calculated in

accordance with BS2B. As at 30 September 2018, the Banking Group had an implied risk weighted exposure of NZ$6,027 million for operational risk

and an operational risk capital requirement of NZ$482 million.

Market risk

The aggregate market risk exposures below have been calculated in accordance with BS2B. The peak end-of-day market risk exposures are for the six

months ended 30 September 2018.


Implied risk weighted

exposure Aggregate capital charge

Period end Peak Period end Peak

As at 30 September 2018 NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m

Interest rate risk

4,733 5,782 379 463

Foreign currency risk

42 152 3 12

Equity risk

1 1 - -

4,776 382


Capital for other material risks

The Banking Group has an Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process (ICAAP) which complies with the requirements of the Bank's Conditions of

Registration. Under the Banking Group's ICAAP it identifies and measures all "other material risks", which are those material risks that are not explicitly

captured in the calculation of the Banking Group's tier 1 and total capital ratios. The other material risks identified by the Banking Group include

pension risk, insurance risk, strategic equity risk, fixed asset risk, deferred acquisition cost risk, value in -force risk, business retention risk and software

risk. The Banking Group's internal capital allocation for these other material risks is NZ$389 million. (2017: NZ$421 million).

Information about Ultimate Parent Bank and Overseas Banking Group

APRA Basel III capital ratios

Overseas Banking Group

Ultimate Parent Bank

(Extended Licensed

Entity)


2018 2017 2018 2017

Common equity tier 1 capital 11.4% 10.6% 11.6% 10.5%

Tier 1 capital 13.4% 12.6% 13.6% 12.7%

Total capital 15.2% 14.8% 15.6% 14.8%


The Ultimate Parent Bank and the Overseas Banking Group are required to hold minimum capital as determined by APRA, which is at least equal to

that specified under the Basel III capital framework.

APRA has authorised the Ultimate Parent Bank and the Overseas Banking Group to use:

• the Advanced Internal Ratings Based (AIRB) methodology for calculation of credit risk weighted assets. There are however small portfolios

(mainly retail and local corporates in Asia Pacific) where the Overseas Banking Group applies the standardised approach.

• the Advanced Measurement Approach (AMA) for the operational risk weighted asset equivalent.

The Overseas Banking Group exceeded the minimum capital requirements set by APRA as at 30 September 2018 and for the comparative prior

periods.

The Overseas Banking Group is required to publicly disclose Pillar 3 financial information as at 30 September 2018. The Overseas Banking Group’s Pillar

3 disclosure document for the quarter ended 30 September 2018, in accordance with APS 330: Public Disclosure of Prudential Information, discloses

capital adequacy ratios and other prudential information. This document can be accessed at the website anz.com.








74

REGISTERED BANK DISCLOSURES



B4. CAPITAL ADEQUACY UNDER THE INTERNAL MODELS BASED APPROACH, AND REGULATORY

LIQUIDITY RATIOS (UNAUDITED)

(continued)

Regulatory liquidity ratios

RBNZ requires banks to hold minimum amounts of liquid assets to help ensure that they are effectively managing their liquidity risks. The mismatch

ratio is a measure of a bank’s liquid assets, adjusted for expected cash inflows and outflows during a 1-month or 1-week period of stress. It is expressed

as a ratio over the bank’s total funding. The Banking Group must maintain its 1-month and 1-week mismatch ratios above zero on a daily basis. The 1-

month and 1-week mismatch ratios are averaged over the quarter.

RBNZ requires banks to get a minimum amount of funding from stable sources called core funding. The minimum amount of core funding is currently

set at 75% of a bank’s total loans. The Banking Group must maintain its core funding ratio above 75% on a daily basis. This measure of the core funding

ratio is averaged over the quarter.

For the three months ended 30 Sep 18 30 Jun 18

Quarterly average 1-week mismatch ratio

5.3%

4.7%

Quarterly average 1-month mismatch ratio

5.1%

4.5%

Quarterly average core funding ratio

89.5%

89.6%


B5. CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT RISK TO INDIVIDUAL COUNTERPARTIES

The Banking Group measures its concentration of credit risk to individual counterparties at the reporting date on the basis of actual exposures. Peak

end-of-day aggregate credit exposures are measured on the basis of internal limits that were not materially exceeded between the reporting date for

the previous disclosure statement and the reporting date for the Disclosure Statement.

The exposure information in the table below excludes exposures to:

• connected persons (ie other members of the Overseas Banking Group and Directors of the Bank);

• the central government or central bank of any country with a long-term credit rating of A- or A3 or above, or its equivalent; and

• any supranational or quasi-sovereign agency with a lo ng-term credit rating of A- or A3 or above, or its equivalent.

As at

Peak end of

day over 6

months to

30 Sep 18 30 Sep 18

Exposures to banks



Total number of exposures to banks that are greater than 10% of CET1 capital

3 3

with a long-term credit rating of A- or A3 or above, or its equivalent

3 3

- 10% to less than 15% of CET1 capital

3 -

- 15% to less than 20% of CET1 capital - 2

- 20% to less than 25% of CET1 capital - 1

with a long-term credit rating of at least BBB- or Baa3, or its equivalent, and at most BBB+ or Baa1, or its equivalent - -

Exposures to non-banks



Total number of exposures to non-banks that are greater than 10% of CET1

2 2

with a long-term credit rating of A- or A3 or above, or its equivalent

2 2

- 10% to less than 15% of CET1 capital

1 1

- 15% to less than 20% of CET1 capital

1 1

with a long-term credit rating of at least BBB- or Baa3, or its equivalent, and at most BBB+ or Baa1, or its equivalent - -


















75

ANZ BANK NEW ZEALAND LIMITED 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

REGISTERED BANK DISCLOSURES


B6. CREDIT EXPOSURES TO CONNECTED PERSONS

Connected persons

Non-bank connected


Amount % of Tier 1 Amount % of Tier 1


NZ$m Capital NZ$m Capital

As at 30 September 2018

Gross amount, before netting

7,907 66.7% - 0.0%

Amount netted

5,475 46.2% - 0.0%

Aggregate credit exposure (on partial bilaterial net basis)

2,432 20.5% - 0.0%

Peak end-of day aggregate credit exposure over the year ended 30 September 2018

Gross amount, before netting 11,196 94.4% - 0.0%

Amount netted 7,718 65.1% - 0.0%

Aggregate credit exposure (on partial bilaterial net basis)

3,478 29.3% - 0.0%


Credit exposures to connected persons

The information on credit exposure to connected persons has been derived in accordance with the RBNZ Banking Supervision Handbook document

Connected Exposures Policy (BS8), is net of individual credit impairment allowances and excludes advances to connected persons of a capital nature.

Peak end-of-day aggregate exposure

Peak end-of-day aggregate credit exposure to connected persons as a ratio to tier 1 capital for the full year accounting period is derived by

determining the maximum end-of-day aggregate amount of credit exposure over the accounting period and then dividing that amount by the

Banking Group’s tier 1 capital as at the reporting date.

Rating contingent limit

The rating-contingent limit that applied to the Banking Group as at 30 September 2018 was 60%. No limit changes have occurred over the year to 30

September 2018. Within the overall rating-contingent limit, there is a sub-limit of 15% of tier 1 capital that applies to the aggregate credit exposure to

non-bank connected persons.

Additional requirements for aggregate credit exposure to connected persons

Aggregate credit exposure to connected persons has been calculated on a partial bilateral net basis. The gross amounts and amounts netted off

under a bilateral netting agreement are included in the table above. There is a limit of 125% of the Banking Group’s tier 1 capital in respect of the gross

amount of aggregate credit exposure to connected persons that can be netted off in determining the net exposure.

Aggregate amount of contingent exposures arising from risk lay-off arrangements

NZ$698 million of contingent exposures of the Banking Group to connected persons arose from risk lay-off arrangements in respect of credit

exposures to counterparties (excluding counterparties that are connected persons) as at 30 September 2018.

Aggregate amount of individual credit impairment allowances against credit exposures to connected persons

There were no individual credit impairment allowances provided against credit exposures to connected persons as at 30 September 2018.






















76

REGISTERED BANK DISCLOSURES



B7. INSURANCE BUSINESS, SECURITISATION, FUNDS MANAGEMENT, OTHER FIDUCIARY ACTIVITES

AND MARKETING AND DISTRIBUTION OF INSURANCE PRODUCTS

Insurance business

The Banking Group conducts insurance business through its subsidiary OnePath. The Banking Group’s aggregate amount of insurance business

comprises the total consolidated assets of OnePath of NZ$940 million (2017: NZ$921 million), which is 0.6% (2017: 0.6%) of the total consolidated

assets of the Banking Group.

Banking Group’s involvement in securitisation, funds management, other fiduciary activities, and marketing and distribution of insurance

products

a) Banking Group’s involvement in the establishment, marketing, or sponsorship of trust, custodial, funds management, and other fiduciary activities

Activity Details

Custodial

The Banking Group operates three custodians:

• ANZ Custodial Services New Zealand Limited, which is the appointed custodian for private banking’s (ANZ Private)

Discretionary Investment Management Service, Wholesale Investment Services and Trading Service;

• ANZ New Zealand Investments Nominees Limited, which is the appointed custodian in respect of direct holdings of

securities by various wholesale customer portfolios managed by ANZ New Zealand Investments Limited (ANZ

Investments); and

• ANZ New Zealand Securities Nominees Limited, which is the appointed custodian for the ANZ Securities share and bond

trading service.

Funds

management


The Banking Group provides the following funds management services:

• Managed Investment Schemes (MIS): The Banking Group’s subsidiaries ANZ Investments and ANZ Investment Services

(New Zealand) Limited (ANZIS) act as manager for a number of managed investment schemes. ANZ Investments holds a

MIS Manager licence, with ANZIS being an authorised body under that licence. ANZ Investments is the issuer and

manager of ANZ and OneAnswer-branded KiwiSaver schemes, retail and wholesale schemes. ANZIS is the issuer and

manager of the Bonus Bonds Scheme and the ANZ PIE Fund.

• Discretionary Investment Management Service (DIMS): The Bank is a licensed DIMS provider. This service is offered to ANZ

Private customers.


Other investment portfolios: ANZ Investments also manages investment portfolios for a number of schemes where the

scheme manager or trustee has outsourced investment management services to ANZ Investments. These schemes are

typically corporate superannuation schemes.

Other fiduciary

activities

ANZ Investments, through its subsidiary OneAnswer Nominees Limited, offers the OneAnswer Portfolio Service. The associated

administration and custody services are provided by FNZ Limited and FNZ Custodians Limited respectively (together FNZ).

FNZ is not a member or related party of the Banking Group.

b) Banking Group’s involvement in the origination of securitised assets, and the marketing or servicing of securitisation schemes

The Banking Group originates securitised assets in the form of residential mortgage backed securities held for potential repurchase transactions with

RBNZ, and covered bonds. Refer to Note 23 Structured Entities for further details about these programmes. Other than these activities, the Banking

Group is not involved in the marketing or servicing of securitisation schemes.

c) Banking Group’s involvement in marketing and distribution of insurance products

The Banking Group markets and distributes life insurance products provided by OnePath.

The Banking Group also markets and distributes other personal and business insurance products provided by or arranged through a number of other

insurance partners. None of these other insurance partners are affiliated insurance entities or affiliated insurance groups.

Arrangements to ensure no adverse impacts arising from the above activities

Arrangements have been put in place to ensure that difficulties arising from the activities in a), b) and c) above would not impact adversely on the

Banking Group. The policies and procedures in place include comprehensive and prominent disclosure of information regarding products, and formal

and regular review of operations and policies by management.














77

ANZ BANK NEW ZEALAND LIMITED 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

REGISTERED BANK DISCLOSURES


B7. INSURANCE BUSINESS, SECURITISATION, FUNDS MANAGEMENT, OTHER FIDUCIARY ACTIVITES AND

MARKETING AND DISTRIBUTION OF INSURANCE PRODUCTS

(continued)

Amounts represented by funds management and securitisation activities

2018 2017

NZ$m NZ$m

Funds under management:

KiwiSaver

1

12,923 11,047

Bonus Bonds Scheme

2

3,300 3,405

Other managed funds

1


2,261

1,984

ANZ PIE Fund

2


1,656

1,381

Discretionary Investment Management Service (DIMS)

3


7,678

7,193

Other investment portfolios

1


2,847

3,480

Total funds under management 30,665

28,490

Funds under custodial arrangements

4

7,970 7,951

Other funds held or managed subject to fiduciary responsibilities

5

1,270 1,325

Outstanding securitised assets originated by the Banking Group - carrying amount of Covered Bonds 3,929 5,315

1

Managed by ANZ New Zealand Investments Limited.

2

Managed by ANZ Investment Services (New Zealand) Limited.

3

Managed by the Bank.

4

Includes NZ$60 million (2017: NZ$370 million) held in custody by ANZ New Zealand Securities Nominees Limited which are not included in funds under management. All other funds held

in custody are included in funds under management.

5

Not included in funds under management.

Financial services provided to entities conducting the above activities

Financial services provided by any member of the Banking Group to entities that conduct the activities in a) or b) above are provided on arm’s length

terms and conditions and at fair value.

Assets purchased from entities conducting the above activities

Over the year ended 30 September 2018, any assets purchased by any member of the Banking Group from entities that conduct the activities in a), b)

or c) above have been purchased on arm’s length terms and conditions and at fair value.

Funding provided to entities in aggregate and individually

The peak end-of day aggregate amount of funding provided to entities that provide services relating to the Banking Group’s involvement in the above

activities over the year ended 30 September 2018 was less than NZ$0.1 million (2017: less than NZ$0.1 million) which was 0.0% (2017: 0.0%) of the

Banking Group’s tier 1 capital and 0.0% (2017: 0.0%) of the total assets of the individual entity.

Method for deriving peak end-of-day amount of funding in aggregate and individually

The peak end-of-day aggregate amount of funding is the maximum end-of-day aggregate amount of funding over the full year accounting period,

divided by the Banking Group’s tier 1 capital as at the balance date, and the total assets as at the balance date of the individual entity to which the

Banking Group has provided funding. Where financial statements for the individual entity are not publicly available, total assets from the publicly

available financial statements of the group of which the entity is a member have been used.





















78

REGISTERED BANK DISCLOSURES



B8. RISK MANAGEMENT POLICIES

Information about risk

The success of the Banking Group’s strategy is underpinned by our sound management of the Banking Group’s risks. All of the Banking

Group’s activities involve - to varying degrees - the analysis, evaluation, acceptance and management of risks or combinations of risks.




The material risks facing per the Banking Group’s RMS, and how these risks are managed are summarised below:

Key material risks

Risk Type Description Management of Risks

Capital Adequacy

Risk

The risk of loss arising from the Banking Group failing to

maintain the level of capital required by prudential re gulators

and other key stakeholders (shareholders, debt investors,

depositors, rating agencies, etc.) to support the Banking

Group’s consolidated operations and risk appetite.

The Banking Group pursues an active approach to Capital

Management through ongoing review, and Board

approval, of the level and composition of the Banking

Group’s capital base against key policy objectives.

Compliance Risk The probability and impact of an event that results in a breach

of any of the following that apply to the Banking Group’s

businesses: laws, regulations, industry standards, codes,

internal policies, internal procedures, or principles of good

governance.

Key features of our Compliance Risk framework include

centralised management of key obligations, and emphasis

on identifying changes in regulations and the business

environment, so as to enable us to:

• proactively assess emerging compliance risks; and

• implement robust reporting and certification

processes.

Credit

Risk

The risk of financial loss resulting from:

• a counterparty failing to fulfil its obligations; or

• a decrease in credit quality of a counterparty resulting in

a financial loss.

Credit Risk incorporates the risks associated with us lending to

customers who could be impacted by climate change or by

changes to laws, regulations, or other policies adopted by

governments or regulatory authorities, including carbon

pricing and climate change adaptation or mitigation policies.

Our Credit Risk framework is top down, being defined by

credit principles and policies. Credit policies, requirements

and procedures cover all aspects of the credit life cycle -

for example: transaction structuring, risk grading, initial

approval, ongoing management and problem debt

management, as well as specialist policy topics.

Liquidity and

Funding Risk

The risk that the Banking Group is unable to meet its payment

obligations as they fall due, including:

• repaying depositors or maturing wholesale debt; or

• the Banking Group having insufficient capacity to fund

increases in assets.

Key principles in managing our Liquidity and Funding Risk

include:

• maintaining the Banking Group’s ability to meet

liquidity ‘survival horizons’ under a range of stress

scenarios to meet cash flow obligations over a short

to medium term horizon;

• maintaining a strong structural funding profile; and

• maintaining a portfolio of high-quality liquid assets

to act as a source of liquidity in times of stress.









79

ANZ BANK NEW ZEALAND LIMITED 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

REGISTERED BANK DISCLOSURES


B8. RISK MANAGEMENT POLICIES (continued)

Risk Type Description Management of Risks

Market

Risk

The risk to the Banking Group’s earnings arising from:

• changes in any interest rates, foreign exchange rates,

credit spreads, volatility, and correlations; or

• from fluctuations in bond, commodity or equity prices.

Our risk management and control framework for Market

Risk involves us quantifying the magnitude of market risk

within the trading and balance sheet portfolios through

independent risk measurement. First, we identify the

range of possible outcomes, the likely timeframe, and the

likelihood of the outcome occurring. Then we allocate an

appropriate amount of capital to support these activities.

Operational Risk

The risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal

processes, people and systems, or from external events.

Operational Risk:

• includes technology risk, cyber risk, legal risk and

conduct risk, and damage arising from inadequate or

failed internal processes, people and systems; but

• excludes Strategic Risk.

The Banking Group operates a three-lines-of-defence

model to manage Operational Risk, with each line of

defence having defined roles, responsibilities and

escalation paths to support effective two-way

communication and effective management of our

operational risk. Also, we have ongoing review

mechanisms to ensure our Operational Risk framework

continues to meet organisational needs and regulatory

requirements.

Reputation Risk

The risk of loss that directly or indirectly impacts earnings,

capital adequacy or value, that is caused by:

• adverse perceptions of the Banking Group held by any

of customers, the community, shareholders, investors,

regulators, or rating agencies;

• conduct risk associated with the Banking Group’s

employees or contractors (or both); or

• the social or environmental (or both) impacts of our

lending decisions.

We manage Reputation Risk by maintaining a positive and

dynamic culture that:

• ensures we act with integrity; and

• enables us to build strong and trusted relationships

with customers and clients, with colleagues, and

with the broader society.

We have well established decision-making frameworks

and policies to ensure our business decisions are guided

by sound social and environmental standards that take

into account Reputation Risk.

Strategic Risk

The risk that the Banking Group’s business strategy and

strategic objectives may le ad to an increase in other key

Material Risks - for example: Credit Risk, Market Risk and

Operational Risk.

We consider and manage Strategic Risks through our

annual strategic planning process, managed by the

Executive Committee and approved by the Board. Any

increase to our key Material Risks is managed in

accordance with the risk management practices specified

above.

Refer to Note 15 Financial Risk Management for the disclosures required under NZ IFRS 7 Financial Instruments: Disclosures.

Capital adequacy

Refer to Note 21 Capital Management for the disclosures required under NZ IAS 1 Presentation of financial statements.

Reviews of the Banking Group’s risk management systems

Refer to Note 15 Financial Risk Management for details of the Internal Audit Function’s reviews of the Banking Group’s RMF. These reviews are not

conducted by a party external to the Banking Group or the Ultimate Parent Bank.

















80

REGISTERED BANK DISCLOSURES



B8. RISK MANAGEMENT POLICIES (continued)

Internal Audit Function of the Banking Group

Refer to Note 15 Financial Risk Management for details of the Internal Audit Function.

The nature and scope of the responsibilities of the Audit Committee responsibilities, to which Internal Audit reports, are to assist the Board of Directors

by providing oversight and review of:

• the Banking Group's financial reporting principles and policies, controls, systems and procedures;

• the effectiveness of the Banking Group’s internal control and risk management framework;

• the work and internal audit standards of Internal Audit which reports directly and solely to the Chair of the Audit Committee. The internal

management reporting line for the General Manager, Internal Audit is to the CEO;

• the integrity of the Banking Group's financial statements and the independent audit thereof, and the Banking Group’s compliance with legal

and regulatory requirements in relation thereto;

• any due diligence procedures;

• prudential supervision procedures and other regulatory requirements to the extent relating to financial reporting; and

• any other matters referred to it by the Board.

The Audit Committee is also responsible for:

• the appointment, annual evaluation and oversight of the external auditor;

• annual review of the independence, fitness and propriety, and qualifications of the external auditor;

• compensation of the external auditor; and

• where deemed appropriate, replacement of the external auditor.

In carrying out its responsibilities and duties, the Audit Committee will aim to seek fair customer outcomes and financial market integrity in its

deliberations.

Measurement of impaired assets

Refer to Note 12 Provision for Credit Impairment and Note 15 Financial Risk Management for details of the Banking Group’s approach to measurement

of impaired assets. Further to this, impairment is assessed monthly, with individual allowances for credit impairment also updated monthly and

collective allowances for credit impairment updated quarterly.

Credit risk mitigation

Refer to Note 18 Offsetting for the policies and processes for, and extent of, on balance sheet netting. The same policies and processes apply to off-

balance sheet credit related commitments. No off-balance sheet credit related commitments or guarantees meet the criteria for netting.

As an Advanced Internal Ratings Based (AIRB) bank, the Banking Group uses the comprehensive method to measure the mitigating effects of

collateral.


The Banking Group assesses the integrity and ability of counterparties to meet their contractual financial obligations for repayment. The Banking

Group generally takes collateral security in the form of real property or a security interest in personal property, except for major government, bank and

corporate counterparties of strong financial standing. Longer term consumer finance, in the form of housing loans, is generally secured against real

estate while short term revolving consumer credit is generally unsecured.

Additional information about credit risk

Implementation of the advanced internal ratings based approach to credit risk measurement

The Banking Group adheres to the standards of risk grading and risk quantification as set out for Internal Ratings Based (IRB) banks in the RBNZ

document Capital Adequacy Framework (Internal Models Based Approach) (BS2B).

Under this IRB Framework banks use their own measures for calculating the level of credit risk associated with customers and exposures, by way of the

primary components of:

• Probability of Default (PD): An estimate of the level of risk of borrower default graded by way of rating models used both at loan origination and

for ongoing monitoring.

• Exposure at Default (EAD): The expected facility exposure at default. Total credit risk-weighted exposures include a scalar of 1.06 in accordance

with the Bank’s Conditions of Registration.

• Loss Given Default (LGD): An estimate of the potential economic loss on a credit exposure, incurred as a consequence of obligor default and

expressed as a percentage of the facility’s EAD. For Retail Mortgage exposures the Bank is required to apply the downturn LGDs according to

loan to value (LVR) bands as set out in BS2B. For farm lending exposures the Banking Group is required to adopt RBNZ prescribed downturn LVR

based LGDs, along with a minimum maturity of 2.5 years and the removal of the firm-size adjustment.

For exposures classified under Specialised Lending, the Banking Group uses slotting tables approved by RBNZ rather than internal estimates.

The exceptions to IRB treatment are three minor portfolios where, due to systems constraints, determining these IRB risk estimates is not currently

feasible or appropriate. Risk weights for these exposures are calculated under a separate treatment as set out in the RBNZ document Capital Adequacy

Framework (Standardised Approach) (BS2A).








81

ANZ BANK NEW ZEALAND LIMITED 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

REGISTERED BANK DISCLOSURES


B8. RISK MANAGEMENT POLICIES (continued)

Classification of Banking Group exposures according to rating approach


Internal ratings based approach

IRB Asset Class Borrower Type Rating Approach

Sovereign Crown IRB - Advanced

RBNZ IRB - Advanced

Any other sovereign and its central bank IRB - Advanced

Bank Registered banks IRB - Advanced

Corporate Corporation, partnerships or proprietorships that do not fit any other asset classification IRB - Advanced

Corporate Small to Medium Enterprises ("SME") with turnover of less than NZ$50 million IRB - Advanced

Retail Mortgages Individuals' borrowings against residential property IRB - Advanced

Other Retail Other lending to individuals (including credit cards) IRB - Advanced

SME business borrowers IRB - Advanced

Corporate sub-class

- Specialised lending

Project finance IRB - Slotting

Income producing real estate IRB - Slotting

Equity IRB

Other assets All other assets not falling within any of the above classes IRB

Standardised approach

Exposure Class Exposure Type Reason for Standardised Approach Future Treatment

Corporate Merchant card prepayment exposures System constraints Move to IRB

Corporate credit cards System constraints Move to IRB

Bank Qualifying Central Counterparty (QCCP) Required by Basel III Standardised


Additional information about operational risk

Operational risk capital is modelled at a New Zealand geographic level and then distributed and adjusted for the business environment and internal

controls down to the business units using the Risk Scenario Methodology. This methodology ensures that there is sufficient operational risk capital

held as a buffer for rare and severe unexpected operational loss events that may impact the New Zealand business. The Methodology applies a

combination of expert judgement, business unit risk profiles, audit findings, and internal and external loss events to derive a series of business specific

Risk Scenarios that are applied to the capital model. The Risk Scenario approach

• assesses the level of the Bank's exposure to specified risk scenarios;

• assesses the scope and quality of the Bank's internal control environment, key operational processes and risk mitigants; and

• directly links the risk scenarios to operational risk capital.

The Banking Group's operating risk capital is calculated using the Ultimate Parent Bank’s methodology, but with standalone New Zealand inputs to

ensure there are no diversification benefits.

The Banking Group does not incorporate any insurance mitigation impact into its capital number. Accordingly, there are no insurance related

questions contained within the Risk Scenario Methodology.

Controls surrounding credit risk rating systems

The term “Rating Systems” covers all of the methods, processes, controls, data collection and technology that support the assessment of credit risk, the

assignment of internal credit risk ratings and the quantification of associated default and loss estimates.

All material aspects of the Rating Systems and risk estimate processes are governed by the Banking Group’s Risk Committee. Risk grades are an integral

part of reporting to senior management and executives. Management and staff of credit risk functions, in conjunction with the relevant Retail and

Wholesale Risk Committees, regularly assess the performance of the rating systems, identify any areas for improvement and monitor progress on

previously identified development work needed.

The Banking Group's Rating Systems are governed by a comprehensive framework of controls that operate at the business unit and support centres,

and through central audit and validation processes. All policies, model designs, model reviews, methodologies, validations, responsibilities, systems

and processes supporting the ratings systems are fully documented.

The Banking Group's Retail and Wholesale ratings functions work closely with the Ultimate Parent Bank's risk ratings functions, are independent of

operational lending activities and are responsible for the ratings strategies and ongoing management of credit risk models within New Zealand. The

annual review of models used across the Banking Group is a function undertaken by the ANZ Decision Model Validation Unit, which is also

independent of credit risk operational functions and is responsible for overseeing the design, implementation and performance of all rating models in

the Banking Group.

The target approach to modelling for the Banking Group is to deploy the model most suitable for the environment. At present this involves an

approach to modelling that combines models developed in New Zealand and models developed by the Ultimate Parent Bank, tested and validated

for use in New Zealand, as appropriate.




82

DIRECTORS' STATEMENT

DIRECTORS' STATEMENT


As at the date on which this Disclosure Statement is signed, after due enquiry, each Director believes that:

• The Disclosure Statement contains all the information that is required by the Registered Bank Disclosure Statements (New Zealand Incorporated

Registered Banks) Order 2014; and

• The Disclosure Statement is not false or misleading.

Over the year ended 30 September 2018, after due enquiry, each Director believes that:

• ANZ Bank New Zealand Limited has complied with all Conditions of Registration that applied during that period except as noted on page 65;

• Credit exposures to connected persons were not contrary to the interests of the Banking Group; and

• ANZ Bank New Zealand Limited had systems in place to monitor and control adequately the Banking Group’s material risks, including credit risk,

concentration of credit risk, interest rate risk, currency risk, equity risk, liquidity risk, operational risk and other business risks, and that those

systems were being properly applied.

This Disclosure Statement is dated, and has been signed by all Directors of the Bank on, 15 November 2018.





Antony Carter





Shayne Elliott





David Hisco





Michelle Jablko





Rt Hon Sir John Key, GNZM AC





Mark Verbiest





Joan Withers
















83

ANZ BANK NEW ZEALAND LIMITED 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT



TO THE SHAREHOLDER OF ANZ BANK NEW ZEALAND LIMITED


REPORT ON THE BANKING GROUP DISCLOSURE STATEMENT




























BASIS FOR OPINION

We conducted our audit in accordance with In ternational Standards on Auditing (New Zealand) (ISA’s (NZ)). We believe that the audit evidence we

have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.

We are independent of the Banking Group in accordance with Professional and Ethical Standard 1 (Revised) Code of Ethics for Assurance Practitioners

issued by the New Zealand Auditing and Assurance Standards Board and the International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants’ Code of Ethics for

Professional Accountants (IESBA Code), and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements and the IESBA

Code.

Our responsibilities under ISA (NZ) are further described in the Auditor’s Responsibilities for the audit of the consolidated financial statements and

registered bank disclosures in section B2, B3, B5, B6, B7 and B8 section of our report.

Our firm has also provided other services to the Banking Group in relation to review of regulatory returns, internal controls reports, prospectus

assurance or reviews and agreed upon procedures engagements. Subject to certain restrictions, partners and employees of our firm may also deal

with the Banking Group on normal terms within the ordinary course of trading activities of the business of the Banking Group. These matters have not

impaired our independence as auditor of the Banking Group. The firm has no other relationship with, or interest in, the Banking Group.

KEY AUDIT MATTERS

Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgement, were of most significance in our audit of the consolidated financial

statements in the current period. We summarise below those matters and our key audit procedures to address those matters in order that the

shareholder as a body may better understand the process by which we arrived at our audit opinion. Our procedures were undertaken in the context

of and solely for the purpose of our statutory audit opinion on the consolidated financial statements as a whole and we do not express discrete

opinions on separate elements of the consolidated financial statements.

PROVISION FOR CREDIT IMPAIRMENT AND DISCLOSURES FOR THE EXPECTED IMPACT OF NZ IFRS 9 FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The Key Audit Matter

The provision for credit impairment is a key audit matter as the Banking Group has significant credit risk exposure to a large number of counterparties

across a wide range of lending and industries. The value of loans and advances on the balance sheet is significant and there is a high degree of

complexity and judgement involved for the Banking Group in estimating individual and collective credit impairment provisions against these loans.

These features resulted in significant audit effort to address the risks around loan recoverability and the determination of related provisions.


OPINION

In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated financial statements of ANZ Bank New Zealand Limited and its subsidiaries (the Banking Group)

on pages 4 to 56:

• give a true and fair view of the Banking Group’s financial position as at 30 September 2018 and its financial performance and cash flows for

the year ended on that date; and

• comply with New Zealand Generally Accepted Accounting Practice, which in this instance means New Zealand Equivalents to International

Financial Reporting Standards (NZ IFRS) and International Financial Reporting Standards.

In our opinion, the Registered Bank disclosures that are required to be disclosed in accordance with Schedules 4, 7, 13, 14, 15 and 17 of the

Registered Bank Disclosure Statements (New Zealand Incorporated Registered Banks) Order 2014 (as amended) (the Order) and is included in

section, B2, B3, B5, B6, B7 and B8 of the Disclosure Statement:

• have been prepared, in all material respects, in accordance with the guidelines issued pursuant to section 78(3) of the Reserve Bank of New

Zealand Act 1989 and any conditions of registration;

• are in accordance with the books and records of the Banking Group in all material respects; and

• fairly states the matters to which it re lates in accordance with those schedules.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated financial statements and registered bank disclosures in section B2, B3, B5, B6, B7 and B8 which

comprise:

• the consolidated statement of financial position as at 30 September 2018;

• the consolidated income statement, statements of comprehensive income, changes in equity and cash flows for the year then ended;

• notes, including a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information; and

• the information that is required to be disclosed in accordance with Schedules 4, 7, 13, 14, 15 and 17 of the Order.




84

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT



In preparation for adoption of NZ IFRS 9 Financial Instruments on 1 October 2018, the Banking Group disclosed the expected impact of adoption. This

added effort to our audit due to the complexity of the accounting standard and its expected pervasive impact on the industry. We focused on the

Banking Group’s disclosure of the expected impact of measuring expected credit losses (ECLs) on loans and advances and the significant judgement

exercised by the Banking Group. The Banking Group’s models to calculate ECLs are inherently complex, and judgement is applied in determining the

correct construct of the models. There are also a number of key assumptions made by the Banking Group in applying the accounting standard

requirements to the models, including the selection and input of forward-looking information.


How the matter was addressed in our audit

Our audit procedures for the individual and collective provision for credit impairment and disclosures for the expected impact of NZ IFRS 9 Financial

Instruments applicable on 1 October 2018 included:

Provisions against specific individual loans (individual provision)

• Testing the key controls over counterparty risk grading for wholesale loans (larger customer exposures that are monitored individually). We

tested the approval of new lending facilities against the Banking Group’s lending policies, the performance of annual loan assessments, and

controls over the monitoring of counterparty credit quality. This included testing controls over the identification of exposures showing signs of

stress, either due to internal factors specific to the counterparty or external macroeconomic factors, and testing the timeliness of and the

accuracy of counterparty risk assessments and risk grading against the requirements of the Banking Group’s lending policies;

• Performing credit assessments of a sample of wholesale loans managed by the Banking Group’s specialist workout and recovery team assessed

as higher risk or impaired, and a sample of other loans, focusing on larger exposures assessed by the Banking Group as showing signs of

deterioration, or in areas of emerging risk (assessed against external market conditions). We challenged the Banking Group’s risk grading of the

loan, their assessment of loan recoverability and the impact on the credit provision. To do this, we reviewed the information on the Banking

Group’s loan file, discussed the case with the loan officer and management, and performed our own assessment of recoverability. This involved

using our understanding of relevant industries and the macroeconomic environment, and comparing assumptions of inputs used by the

Banking Group in recoverability assessments to externally sourced evidence, such as commodity prices, publicly available audited financial

statements, and comparable external valuations of collateral held; and

• Evaluating the Banking Group’s oversight of retail loan portfolios (smaller customer exposures not monitored individually), with a focus on

controls over delinquency statistics monitoring. We tested a sample of provisions held against different loan products, based on their

delinquency profile, and challenged assumptions made in respect of expected recoveries, primarily from collateral held.

Provisions estimated across loan portfolios (collective provision)

• Testing the Banking Group’s processes to validate the models used to calculate collective provisions, and evaluating the Banking Group’s model

methodologies against established market practices and criteria in the accounting standards;

• Testing the key controls within IT systems used to calculate the collective provision, specifically those relating to data management and the

completeness and accuracy of data transfer from underlying source systems to the collective provision models;

• Testing the accuracy of key inputs into models by checking a sample of balances to the general ledger and risk ratings to source systems;

• Challenging the key assumptions in the models such as emergence periods, probability of default and loss given default for a sample of retail

and wholesale portfolios. We compared modelled estimates against actual losses incurred by the Banking Group; and

• Re-performing the calculation of collective provisions, for a sample of retail and wholesale portfolios and using a KPMG-constructed calculation

tool to determine the accuracy of model output.

We also challenged key assumptions in the components of the Banking Group’s collective provision balance held above modelled provision

estimates. This included:

• Evaluating inputs to the concentration risk and economic cycle provisions by comparing underlying portfolio characteristics to loss experience,

current market conditions and specific risks inherent in the Banking Group’s loan portfolios;

• Assessing the requirement for other additional provisions by considering model or data deficiencies identified by the Banking Group’s model

validation processes; and

• Assessing the completeness of additional provisions by checking the consistency of risks identified in the portfolios to their inclusion in the

Banking Group’s assessment.

NZ IFRS 9 Financial Instruments

We assessed the Banking Group’s disclosures for the expected impact of NZ IFRS 9 Financial Instruments which is applicable on 1 October 2018.

Together with KPMG credit risk and economics specialists, our procedures included:

• Assessing the Banking Group’s significant accounting policies against the requirements of the accounting standard;

• Assessing the Banking Group’s ECL modelling methodology and for a sample of models testing key credit modelling assumptions incorporated

in the ECL models against the requirements of the standard and underlying accounting records;

• Assessing forward-looking economic assumptions and the development of economic scenarios against external economic information, and the

application into the ECL models;

• Testing data reconciliation controls between the ECL models and source systems;

• Testing the accuracy of the modelled calculations by re -performing the ECL calculations on a sample basis;

• Assessing the disclosures in the financial statements against the requirements of NZ IFRS.

VALUATION OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The Key Audit Matter

Financial instruments held at fair value on the Banking Group’s balance sheet include available-for-sale assets, trading securities, derivative assets and

liabilities, investments backing insurance contract liabilities, certain debt securities, and other assets and liabilities designated as measured at fair value

through profit or loss.




85

ANZ BANK NEW ZEALAND LIMITED 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT


The instruments are mainly risk management products sold to customers and used by the Banking Group to manage its own interest rate and foreign

exchange risk.

The valuation of financial instruments held at fair value is considered a Key Audit Matter due to:

• Financial instruments held at fair value are significant (15% of assets and 7% of liabilities);

• The significant volume and range of products transacted, increases the risk of inconsistencies in transaction management processes that could

lead to inaccurate valuation;

• Determining the fair value of trading securities and derivatives involves a significant level of judgement by the Banking Group, increasing the risk

of error, and adding complexity to our audit. The level of judgement increases where internal models, as opposed to quoted market prices, are

used to determine fair value of an instrument; and

• The valuation of certain derivatives held by the Banking Group is sensitive to inputs including credit risk, funding rates, probabilities of default

and loss given default, and industry practice is evolving as to how the impact of both funding and credit risk is incorporated within the valuation

of certain derivative instruments. This increased our audit effort in this area and necessitated the involvement of valuation specialists.

How the matter was addressed in our audit

Our audit procedures for the valuation of financial instruments held at fair value included:

• Testing access rights and change management controls for key valuation systems;

• Testing interface controls, notably the completeness and accuracy of data transfers between transaction processing systems, key systems used

to generate valuations and any related valuation adjustments, and the Banking Group’s market risk management and finance systems to identify

inconsistencies in transaction management and valuation processes across products;

• Testing the governance and approval controls such as management review and approval of the valuation models and approval of new products

against policies and procedures;

• Testing the front office management review and approval of the daily financial instrument trading profit and loss reconciliations prepared by the

Banking Group’s independent product control function;

• Testing the management review and approval of model construction and validation, aimed at assessing the validity and robustness of

underlying valuation models; and

• Testing the Banking Group’s data validation controls, such as those over key inputs in generating the fair value to market data where fair values

were determined by front office teams.

We tested the valuation of financial instruments with both observable and unobservable inputs. Our specific testing involved valuation specialists and

included:

• Re-performing the valuation of ‘level 1’ and ‘level 2’ available for sale assets and trading securities, which are primarily government, semi-

government and corporate debt securities, by comparing the observable inputs, including quoted prices, to independently sourced market

data;

• Using independent models, re -calculating the valuation of a sample of derivative assets and li abilities where the fair value was determined using

observable inputs. This included comparing a sample of observable inputs used in the Banking Group’s derivative valuations to independently-

sourced market data, such as interest rates, foreign exchange ra tes and volatilities;

• Where the fair value of derivatives and other financial assets and liabilities were determined using unobservable inputs (‘level 3’ instruments),

challenging the Banking Group’s valuation model by testing the key inputs used to comparable data in the market, including the use of proxy

instruments and available alternatives. We compared the Banking Group’s valuation methodology to industry practice and the criteria in the

accounting standards; and

• Evaluating the appropriateness of the Banking Group’s valuation methodology for derivative financial instruments, having regard to current and

emerging derivative valuation practices across a range of peer institutions and against the required criteria in the accounting standards. We

tested adjustments made to valuations, particularly funding and credit valuation adjustments on un-collateralised derivatives. In particular, for a

sample of individual counterparties, we tested key inputs to the credit valuation adjustment calculation, including the probability of default,

against observable market data. Where proxies were used, we assessed the proxy against available alternatives across a number of locations.

IT SYSTEMS AND CONTROLS

The Key Audit Matter

As a major New Zealand bank, the Banking Group’s businesses utilise a large number of complex, interdependent Information Technology (IT) systems

to process and record a high volume of transactions. Controls over access and changes to IT systems are critical to the recording of financial

information and the preparation of a financial report which provides a true and fair view of the Banking Group’s financial position and performance.

The IT systems and controls, as they impact the financial recording and reporting of transactions, is a key audit matter and our audit approach could

significantly differ depending on the effective operation of the Banking Group’s IT controls. KPMG IT specialists were used throughout the

engagement as a core part of our audit team.

How the matter was addressed in our audit

We tested the control environment for key IT applications (systems) used in processing significant transactions and recording balances in the general

ledger. We also tested automated controls embedded within these systems. Our audit procedures included:

• Testing the governance controls used by the Banking Group’s technology teams and third party suppliers to monitor system integrity, by

checking matters impacting the operational integrity of core systems for escalation and action in accordance with the Banking Group’s policies;

• Testing the access rights given to staff by checking them to approved records, and inspecting the reports over the granting and removal of

access rights. We also looked for evidence of escalation of breaches;

• Testing preventative controls designed to enforce segregation of duties between users within particular systems;

• Testing the operating effectiveness of automated controls, principally relating to the automated calculation of financial transactions. We tested




86

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT



the inputs used within automated calculations to source data and also tested the accuracy of the calculation logic for a sample of transactions

within each identified control; and

• Testing the operating effectiveness of automated reconciliation controls, both between systems and intra-system. For a sample of identified

breaks, in reconciliations, we checked that these were recorded on exception reports, and subsequently investigated and cleared by the Banking

Group.

OTHER INFORMATION

The Directors, on behalf of the Banking Group, are responsible for the General Disclosures required to be included in the Banking Group’s Disclosure

Statement in accordance with Schedule 2 of the Order (section B1).

Our opinion on the consolidated financial statements does not cover section B1 or the Supplementary Information relating to the Bank Financial

Strength Dashboard and other information included on pages 89-92 (collectively referred to as ‘other information’) and we do not express any form of

assurance conclusion thereon.

In connection with our audit of the consolidated financial statements our responsibility is to read the other information and, in doing so, consider

whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the consolidated financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit or

otherwise appears materially misstated. If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude that there is a material misstatement of this other

information, we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report in this regard.

REPORT ON OTHER LEGAL AND REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS

In accordance with the requirements of clauses 2(1)(d) and 2(1)(e) of Schedule 1 of the Order, we report that:

• we have obtained all the information and explanations we have required; and

• in our opinion, proper accounting records have been kept by the Banking Group, as far as appears from our examination of those records.

RESPONSIBILITIES OF DIRECTORS FOR THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND REGISTERED BANK

DISCLOSURES IN SECTION B2, B3, B5, B6, B7 AND B8

The Directors, on behalf of the Banking Group, are responsible for:

• the preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with Clause 24 of the Order, NZ IFRS and

International Financial Reporting Standards;

• the preparation and fair presentation of supplementary information, in accordance with Schedules 4, 7, 13, 14, 15 and 17 of the Order;

• implementing necessary internal controls to enable the preparation of consolidated financial statements that are fairly presented and free from

material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; and

• assessing the ability to continue as a going concern. This includes disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the

going concern basis of accounting unless they either intend to liquidate or to cease operations, or have no realistic alternative but to do so.

AUDITOR’S RESPONSIBILITIES FOR THE AUDIT OF THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND

REGISTERED BANK DISCLOSURES IN SECTION B2, B3, B5, B6, B7 AND B8

Our objective is:

• to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the Disclosure Statement, including the consolidated financial statements prepared in

accordance with Clause 24 of the Order, and registered bank disclosures in section B2, B3, B5, B6, B7 and B8, prepared in accordance with

Schedules 4, 7, 13, 14, 15 and 17 of the Order as a whole is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; and

• to issue an Independent Auditor’s Report that includes our opinion.

Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with International Standards on

Auditing (New Zealand) will always detect a material misstatement when it exists.


Misstatements can arise from fraud or error. They are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to

influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of this consolidated financial statements.


A further description of our responsibilities for the audit of these consolidated financial statements is located at the External Reporting Board (XRB)

website at:


http://www.xrb.govt.nz/standards-for-assurance-practitioners/auditors-responsibilities/audit-report-1/

This description forms part of our independent auditor’s report.









87

ANZ BANK NEW ZEALAND LIMITED 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT





88














BASIS FOR CONCLUSION ON THE REGISTERED BANK DISCLOSURES IN SECTION B4

A review of the registered bank disclosures in section B4 in accordance with NZ SRE 2410 Review of Financial Statements Performed by the Independent

Auditor of the Entity (NZ SRE 2410) is a limited assurance engagement. The auditor performs procedures, primarily consisting of making enquiries,

primarily of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters, and applying analytical and other review procedures. Our responsibilities under

that standard are further described in the Auditor’s Responsibilities for the review of the registered bank disclosures in section B4 of our report.

As the auditor of the Banking Group, NZ SRE 2410 requires that we comply with the ethical requirements relevant to the audit of the annual financial

statements.

RESPONSIBILITIES OF DIRECTORS FOR THE REGISTERED BANK DISCLOSURES IN SECTION B4

The Directors are responsible for the preparation of registered bank disclosures in section B4 that is required to be prepared and disclosed in

accordance with Schedule 11 of the Order and described in section B4 to the Disclosure Statement.

AUDITOR’S RESPONSIBILITIES FOR THE REVIEW OF THE REGISTERED BANK DISCLOSURES IN SECTION B4

Our responsibility is to express a conclusion on the registered bank disclosures in section B4 based on our review. We conducted our review in

accordance with NZ SRE 2410 issued by the New Zealand External Reporting Board. As the auditor of the Banking Group, NZ SRE 2410 requires that we

comply with the ethical requirements relevant to the audit of the annual financial statements, and plan and perform the review to obtain limited

assurance about whether the registered bank disclosures in section B4 is, in all material respects, disclosed in accordance with Schedule 11 of the

Order.


A review of the registered bank disclosures in section B4 in accordance with NZ SRE 2410 is a limited assurance engagement. The auditor performs

procedures, primarily consisting of making enquiries, primarily of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters, and applying analytical

and other review procedures.


The procedures performed in a review are substantially less than those performed in an audit conducted in accordance with International Standards

on Auditing (New Zealand). Accordingly we do not express an audit opinion on the

registered bank disclosures in section B4.

USE OF THE INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT

This Independent Auditor’s Report is made solely to the shareholder as a body. Our work has been undertaken so that we might state to the

shareholder those matters we are required to state to them in the Independent Auditor’s Report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent

permitted by law, we do not accept or assume responsibility to anyone other than the shareholder as a body for our work, this report, or any of the

opinions or conclusions we have formed.


The engagement partner on the audit resulting in this independent auditor's report is Matthew Prichard.


For and on behalf of






KPMG

Auckland

15 November 2018




REVIEW CONCLUSION ON THE REGISTERED BANK DISCLOSURES IN SECTION B4 RELATING TO CAPITAL

ADEQUACY AND REGULATORY LIQUIDITY RATIOS (B4)

Based on our review, nothing has come to our attention that causes us to believe that the information relating to Capital Adequacy and

Regulatory Liquidity Ratios, disclosed in section B4 of the Disclosure Statement, is not, in all material respects disclosed in accordance with

Schedule 11 of the Order.

We have reviewed the registered bank disclosures as disclosed in section B4 of the Disclosure Statement for the year ended 30 September 2018.

The registered bank disclosures that is required to be disclosed in accordance with Schedule 11 of the Order.





BANK FINANCIAL

STRENGTH DASHBOARD




This section does not form part of the Disclosure Statement. It contains information in respect

of the Banking Group included on the Bank Financial Strength Dashboard (Dashboard)

published on RBNZ’s website. There is no requirement for the Directors to review or approve

this information.


Amounts below may differ slightly from those published by RBNZ due to rounding differences.

The tables include reconciliations to amounts included in the Disclosure Statement where there

are classification differences between the financial statements and the Dashboard.




Dashboard

D1. Credit Ratings 90

D2. Capital Adequacy 90

D3. Asset Quality 90

D4. Profitability / Performance 91

D5. Financial Position 91

D6. Liquidity 91

D7. Large Exposures 91


Other information

Reconciliation of total loans by industry and sector 92























89

ANZ BANK NEW ZEALAND LIMITED 2018 ANNUAL REPORT Unaudited

BANK FINANCIAL STRENGTH DASHBOARD


D1. CREDIT RATINGS


As at 30 September 2018

Credit rating

S&P Global

AA-

Fitch

AA-

Moody's

A1


D2. CAPITAL ADEQUACY


Capital ratios



As at 30 September 2018



Total capital ratio 14.4%

Common equity tier 1 (CET1) capital ratio

11.1%

Tier 1 capital ratio

14.4%

Buffer ratio

6.4%

Total capital ratio regulatory minimum

8.0%

Capital


As at 30 September 2018 NZ$m

CET1 capital 12,809

CET1 deductions (3,728)

Net CET1 capital 9,081

Total additional tier 1 capital 2,776

Total tier 1 capital 11,857

Total capital 11,857


Risk weighted assets



Classification differences



Disclosure

Statement

Default

exposures

Credit valuation

adjustments

Exposure

categories Dashboard

As at 30 September 2018


NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m

Sovereign / quasi-sovereign

170 - (46) - 124

Public sector entities

- - (325) 669 344

Registered banks

3,112 - (576) (669) 1,867

Corporates

27,103 (658) (892) 10,724 36,277

Retail / Residential mortgages

16,998 (42) - - 16,956

Other retail

8,705 (42) - (8,663) -

Specialised lending exposures subject to slotting approach 10,783 - (59) (10,724) -

Exposures subject to standardised approach

528 - - (528) -

Problem loans

- 742 - - 742

Equity holdings

28 - - - 28

Credit risk supervisory adjustment

- - - 2,325 2,325

All other assets

1,592 - 1,898 9,191 12,681

Credit risk

69,019 - - 2,325 71,344

Market risk

4,776 - - - 4,776

Operational risk

6,027 - - - 6,027

Agri business supervisory adjustment

2,325 - - (2,325) -

Total risk weighted assets

82,147 - - - 82,147


D3. ASSET QUALITY

Housing Consumer Business Agriculture All other Total

As at 30 September 2018 NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m

Total loans

75,847 3,574 28,821 17,427 1,389 127,058

Impaired loans

35 11 76 154 45 321

Loans 90 days past due but not impaired

151 24 27 3 - 205

Total non-performing loans

186 35 103 157 45 526

Non-performing loans ratio (%) 0.25% 0.98% 0.36% 0.90% 3.24% 0.41%

Individual provisions 8 6 45 35 36 130

Collective provisions 72 64 92 43 111 382

On-balance sheet residential mortgage exposures with LVRs that:

Exceeds 80% and not 90% 3.4%

Exceeds 90% 1.7%



A reconciliation of the amounts in this table to the financial statements is included in the Other Information on page 92.


The Supplementary Information does not form part of the Disclosure Statement


90

BANK FINANCIAL STRENGTH DASHBOARD



D4. PROFITABILITY / PERFORMANCE


Financial statements Classification differences


For the

12 months ended

30 September 2018

Less: For the

9 months ended

30 June 2018

Funds management

income and other

commissions Dashboard


NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m

Interest income 6,390 (4,767) - 1,623

Interest expense 3,240 (2,415) - 825

Net interest income 3,150 (2,352) - 798

Gains/losses on trading and hedging

250 (158) - 92

Fee and commission income

394 (300) 69 163

All other income

482 (368) (69) 45

Operating expenses

1,517 (1,121) - 396

Impaired asset expense

55 (78) - (23)

Profit before tax

2,704 (1,979) - 725

Tax expense

751 (547) - 204

Profit after tax

1,953 (1,432) - 521

Return on assets (%)

1.3%

Return on equity (%)

15.6%

Net interest margin (%)

2.2%


D5. FINANCIAL POSITION

Classification diffe rences


Financial

statements

Other bank

deposits and

other assets

Securities

purchased under

agreements

to re-sell

Subordinated

debt issued to

NZ Branch Dashboard

As at 30 September 2018 NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m

Cash and bank deposits

1


4,119 40 (136) - 4,023

Debt securities held

2

14,653 (78) - - 14,575

Net loans and advances 126,466 - - - 126,466

Derivatives in an asset position 8,086 - - - 8,086

All other assets 5,688 38 136 - 5,862

Total assets


159,012 - - - 159,012

Deposits

104,055 - - - 104,055

Debt securities issued

3


28,531 - - (1,941) 26,590

Other borrowings

4


1,402 1,336 - 1,941 4,679

Derivatives in a liability position

8,095 - - - 8,095

All other liabilities

3,820 (1,336) - - 2,484

Total liabilities 145,903 - - - 145,903

Equity


13,109 - - - 13,109

1

Comprises cash and collateral paid


2

Comprises trading securities, investments backing insurance contract liabilities and available-for-sale assets

3

Comprises debt issuances plus certificates of deposit and commercial paper from deposits and other borrowings

4

Comprises collateral received and the remaining items of deposits and other borrowings


D6. LIQUIDITY


3 months to 30 September 2018

Quarterly average core funding ratio

89.5%

Quarterly average 1-month mismatch ratio

5.1%

Quarterly average 1-week mismatch ratio

5.3%


D7. LARGE EXPOSURES


As at 30 September 2018



Top 5 credit exposures to non-bank counterparties

as a ratio of CET1 capital

51.3%

Credit exposures to non-bank counterparties

that are greater than 10% of CET1 capital

2

Top 5 credit exposures to banks as a ratio of

CET1 capital

48.4%

Credit exposures to banks that are greater than

10% of CET1 capital

3


The Supplementary Information does not form part of the Disclosure Statement


91

ANZ BANK NEW ZEALAND LIMITED 2018 ANNUAL REPORT Unaudited

OTHER INFORMATION


Reconciliation of total loans by industry and sector

The financial statements and Dashboard include amounts for total loans which are based on different definitions. The table below reconciles the

various amounts. This information does not form part of the Disclosure Statement.

Housing loans and residential mortgage definitions

Housing loans comprise loans for owner occupier property use and residential investor property use. Owner occupiers are borrowers who own or are

in the process of buying or building the house or flat they will live in as their principal place of residence. An owner can occupy more than one

property e.g. a family home and a holiday home. Only households can have owner occupier property use loans. Investors are entities or persons

borrowing for the purpose of building or purchasing residential property to rent. This includes ‘Mum and dad’ investor loans and any person(s) that

have a separate residential investor property use loan which is not for their normal business purpose.

Residential mortgage exposures used in the loan-to-valuation ratio analysis are based on the definition of residential mortgage loans as defined in the

Banking Supervision Handbook document Capital Adequacy Framework (internal models based approach) (BS2B). This metric is based on a collateral

definition and may include some other lending that is not defined as Housing lending in the asset quality section of the Dashboard. See the Banking

Supervision Handbook for a more detailed definition.


Housing Consumer Business Agriculture All other

1

Total

As at 30 September 2018 Note NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m NZ$m

Total loans per Balance Sheet 11

78,395 n/a n/a n/a 48,509 126,904

Fair value hedge adjustment

(10) - - - 10 -

Business loans secured by residential property

(2,538) - - 317 2,221 -

Residential investor property

(21,101) - - 49 21,052 -

Other household and agriculture industry loans - 3,574 - 17,478 (21,052) -

Concentration of loans by industry

2

15 54,746 3,574 - 17,844 50,740 126,904

Fair value hedge adjustments - - - - (10) (10)

Unearned income on finance leases - - - - (204) (204)

Deposit components of overdraft product - - - - 368 368

Residential investor property 21,101 - - (49) (21,052) -

Business lending - - 28,462 (51) (28,411) -

Loans by purpose (RBNZ series S31) 75,847 3,574 28,462 17,744 1,431 127,058

Other business loans secured by residential property

- - 359 (317) (42) -

Total loans per Dashboard D3

75,847 3,574 28,821 17,427 1,389 127,058

1

All other in RBNZ series S31 and the Dashboard comprises: Depository and other financial institutions, Central and Local Government, Non-profit institutions serving households.


2

Household exposures (resident and non-resident) in Note 15 Financial Risk Management (Concentrations of Credit Risk) on page 32 comprise Housing and Consumer.


The Supplementary Information does not form part of the Disclosure Statement


92
































This page has been left blank intentionally

Data sourced from publicly available filings. Our datasets may not be complete. Automated analysis can produce errors. If you believe any data on this page is incorrect, please contact us at hello@nzxplorer.co.nz. For informational purposes only. Not investment advice.