Infratil Limited/Announcement
Infratil Limited logo

Ruling on NZX Listing Rule 2.11.3

NZX Compliance20 August 2019IFTUtilities

NZX Regulation Decision
Infratil Limited (“IFT”)

Application for a Ruling on NZX Listing Rule 2.11.3








21 August 2019





NZX REGULATION DECISION – 21 August 2019
2 of 4



Background

1. The material information on which this decision is based is set out in Appendix One to this

decision. This ruling will not apply if that information is not, or ceases to be, full and accurate

in all material respects.

2. The Rules to which this decision relates are set out in Appendix Two.

3. Capitalised terms which have not been defined in this decision have the meanings given to

them in the Rules.

Ruling on Rule 2.11.3

Decision

4. On the basis that the information provided by IFT is complete and accurate in all material

respects, NZXR rules that for the purposes of the application of Rule 2.11.3, to Resolution 4

of IFT’s 2019 Notice of Meeting, the phrase “... the number when the remuneration was

approved by an Ordinary Resolution,...” in the first sentence of Rule 2.11.3 means seven

Directors.

Reasons

5. In coming to the decision to grant the ruling set out in paragraph 4 above, NZXR has

considered that:

a. IFT has submitted, and NZXR has no reason not to accept, that without clarification,

there could be ambiguity for both IFT and its shareholders as to either the need, or

ability for the Directors’ remuneration pool to be adjusted following the retirement of the

eighth Director at the end of its 2019 Meeting. It is in the interests of both IFT and its

shareholders that the application of the Rules does not result in ambiguity.


b. IFT has submitted that in the event that IFT were to increase the number of Directors

on its board, IFT would want to be able to adjust the aggregate Directors’ remuneration

pool in line with what 2.11.3 allows – read as if the number of Directors when the

remuneration was approved by shareholder resolution was seven rather than eight.


c. IFT shareholders will have oversight of the Directors’ remuneration pool in a manner

consistent with the requirements of Rule 2.11; and


d. IFT has disclosed information relevant to shareholders’ consideration of the ordinary

resolution to increase Directors’ remuneration in the notice of meeting for the 2019

Meeting.


NZX REGULATION DECISION – 21 August 2019
3 of 4


Appendix One

1. Infratil Limited (IFT) is a Listed Issuer with ordinary shares Quoted on the NZX Main Board

bonds quoted on the NZX Debt Market and as such is subject to the NZX Listing Rules

(Rules).

2. IFT will hold its annual shareholders meeting on 22 August 2019 (2019 Meeting). At this

meeting IFT proposes to seek shareholder approval to increase the aggregate pool of

Directors’ remuneration (Resolution 4) in accordance with the requirements of Rule 2.11.

3. Rule 2.11.3 provides that where Directors’ remuneration is expressed as an amount

payable to all Directors in aggregate, then if there is an increase in the number of Directors

from when the remuneration was approved by an ordinary resolution, the Board may,

without an ordinary resolution, increase the remuneration payable to all Directors of the

Issuer in aggregate by an amount necessary to pay an additional Director remuneration not

exceeding the average amount then being paid to each of the other non-executive

Directors.

4. IFT will seek shareholder approval to increase the pool of Directors’ remuneration on the

basis that its board of Directors will comprise seven Directors immediately following the

meeting. However, at the time the resolution is put to shareholders IFT will temporarily have

eight Directors, as one of the Directors intends to retire at the end rather than the beginning

of the 2019 Meeting, and it is the aggregate remuneration for seven Directors that IFT

wishes its shareholders to approve, given that is the number of Directors shareholders

expect to be in office immediately following the 2019 Meeting.

5. IFT has sought a ruling from NZX Regulation (NZXR) that for the purposes of the

application of Rule 2.11.3 to Resolution 4 of the 2019 Meeting the phrase “...the number

when the remuneration was approved by an Ordinary Resolution,...” in the first sentence of

Rule 2.11.3 means “seven”.

6. The effect of such a ruling means that if IFT increases the number of its Directors in the

future beyond seven, then for the purposes of Rule 2.11.3, the aggregate remuneration

approved by an ordinary resolution at IFT’s 2019 Meeting is deemed to be for seven

Directors, and it will be able to increase Directors’ remuneration for additional Directors

beyond seven in accordance with Rule 2.11.3.


NZX REGULATION DECISION – 21 August 2019
4 of 4


Appendix Two

Rule 2.11 Directors’ Remuneration


2.11.1 No remuneration may be paid by an Issuer, or its Subsidiaries (unless such Subsidiary is

Listed), to a Director in his or her capacity as a Director without prior authorisation by an

Ordinary Resolution. Such resolution must express Directors' remuneration as either a

monetary sum per annum payable to:

(a) all Directors of the Issuer in aggregate, or

(b) any person who from time to time holds office as a Director of the Issuer.

2.11.3 If remuneration is expressed in accordance with Rule 2.11.1(a) and there is an increase

in the number of Directors from the number when the remuneration was approved by an

Ordinary Resolution, the Board may, without an Ordinary Resolution, increase the

remuneration payable to all Directors of the Issuer in aggregate. The amount of the

increase per additional Director may not exceed the amount necessary to enable the

additional Director or Directors to be paid the average amount then being paid to each

non-Executive Director (other than the chairperson) of the Issuer.

Data sourced from publicly available filings. Our datasets may not be complete. Automated analysis can produce errors. If you believe any data on this page is incorrect, please contact us at hello@nzxplorer.co.nz. For informational purposes only. Not investment advice.

Other issuers discussed similar conditions around this time

Matched by meaning across NZX announcement text, not keywords — based on our semantic index of announcement bodies.