Fitch Long-Term and Short-Term Ratings
NZX/ASX Release
Fitch Long-Term and Short-Term Ratings
29 October 2019
Fitch Ratings (Fitch) has affirmed the Long-Term Issuer Default Ratings (IDR) of Heartland Group
Holdings Limited (NZX/ASX: HGH) (Heartland Group) and Heartland Bank Limited (NZX: HBL)
(Heartland Bank) at 'BBB' and the Long-Term IDR of Heartland Australia Group Pty Ltd (Heartland
Australia) at 'BBB-'. The Outlooks are Stable.
Fitch has downgraded the Short-Term IDR on Heartland Group and Heartland Bank to ‘F3’ from ‘F2’.
This follows a change in Fitch’s ratings criteria.
Fitch’s press release is attached.
- Ends -
For further information, please contact:
Andrew Dixson
Head of Corporate Finance
Heartland Group Holdings Limited
09 927 9274
10/25/2019Press Release
https://www.fitchratings.com/site/pr/10098565#1/6
Fitch Affirms Heartland at 'BBB'; Downgrades Short-Term IDR to
'F3'
Fitch Ratings - Sydney - 24 October 2019:
Fitch Ratings has affirmed the Long-Term Issuer Default Ratings (IDR) of Heartland Group Holdings Limited
(HGL) and Heartland Bank Limited (HBL) at 'BBB' and the Long-Term IDR of Heartland Australia Group Pty
Ltd (HAG) at 'BBB-'. The Outlooks are Stable.
At the same time, Fitch has downgraded the Short-Term IDRs on HGL and HBL to 'F3' from 'F2' because
the funding and liquidity mid-point of 'bbb', which feeds into the Viability Rating, is below the minimum level
required to maintain the Short-Term IDR at 'F2' under Fitch's cross-sector Short-Term Ratings Criteria. The
Short-Term IDR has been removed from Under Criteria Observation, under which it was placed in May 2019
following the publication of the new criteria.
RATING ACTIONS
ENTITY/DEBTRATINGPRIOR
Heartland Australia Group Pty
Ltd
LT IDR
BBB-
Affirmed
BBB-
ST IDR
F3
Affirmed
F3
Support
2
Affirmed
2
Heartland Group Holdings
Limited
LT IDR
BBB
Affirmed
BBB
ST IDR
F3
Downgrade
F2
LC LT IDR
BBB
Affirmed
BBB
LC ST IDR
F3
Downgrade
F2
Viability
bbb
Affirmed
bbb
Heartland Bank Limited
LT IDR
BBB
Affirmed
BBB
ST IDR
F3
Downgrade
F2
LC LT IDR
BBB
BBB
10/25/2019Press Release
https://www.fitchratings.com/site/pr/10098565#2/6
Affirmed
LC ST IDR
F3
Downgrade
F2
Viability
bbb
Affirmed
bbb
Support
5
Affirmed
5
Support Floor
NF
Affirmed
NF
senior unsecured
LT
BBB
Affirmed
BBB
senior unsecured
ST
F3
Downgrade
F2
Key Rating Drivers
IDRS AND VIABILITY RATINGS FOR HGL and HBL
The ratings on HGL and HBL are driven by the group's consolidated risk profile, which reflects the close
correlation between failure and default probabilities of the two entities and the group's higher risk appetite
relative to peers, although this is mitigated by its stronger profitability. HBL accounted for 85% of the
consolidated group's total assets as at the financial year ending June 2019 (FY19).
Risk appetite remains the key driver of the ratings, particularly the group's underwriting standards. The
group's underwriting standards have improved over time and its systems and underwriting processes have
benefited from ongoing investment. However, we expect the group's financial profile to be more vulnerable
to economic shocks given the higher-risk nature of its loan book.
Group profitability continues to compare favourably against that of peers, benefiting from the higher margins
of its loan book and sound cost-to-income ratio. This provides adequate buffers to absorb larger impairment
charges during a downturn. Fitch believes the continued investment in platforms and increased focus on
compliance could pressure costs for the next year, but these should remain manageable.
Asset quality is sound and the impaired loan ratio has remained consistent, but trails that of most domestic
peers due to differing exposure types. An increase in the impaired loan ratio in FY19 was largely due to the
adoption of IFRS9 and Fitch's adoption of Stage 3 loans, where disclosed, as the impaired loan figure when
calculating the ratio. We expect the group's asset quality ratios to remain around current levels for the next
year, supported by the low interest-rate environment.
The group's funding profile has been generally stable over the last few years, despite reliance on
confidence-sensitive wholesale funding remaining higher than for domestic peers. We believe the group's
strong interest margin will improve flexibility should the group need to attract more deposits. The liquidity
profile is satisfactory, although the group has less contingent liquidity sources compared with peers, as its
reverse mortgage book is not repo-eligible and therefore cannot be securitised to provide additional liquidity.
The senior unsecured debt ratings are driven by the same rationale as the Viability Ratings.
SUPPORT RATING AND SUPPORT RATING FLOOR FOR HBL
10/25/2019Press Release
https://www.fitchratings.com/site/pr/10098565#3/6
The Support Rating and Support Rating Floor of HBL reflect Fitch's view that while support for the group
from the New Zealand sovereign is possible, it cannot be relied on. We believe the group's small size and
the existence of the open bank resolution scheme lowers the propensity of the sovereign to support its
banks. The scheme allows for the imposition of losses on depositors and senior debt holders to recapitalise
a failed institution.
HAG
HAG's IDRs are driven by institutional support from its parent, HGL, which fully owns HAG. We believe
HAG, which holds the group's Australia business, is a strategically important part of HGL and has strong
management synergies with the parent and benefits from being part of the wider group.
HAG's IDR is notched down once from the parent to reflect our view that while HAG is important to the
group, its small size means that it is not a key and integral part of the business. HAG's Support Rating of '2'
reflects Fitch's view that there is high probability of support from HGL.
RATING SENSITIVITIES
IDRS AND VIABILITY RATING FOR HGL and HBL
The IDRs and Viability Rating of HGL and HBL are sensitive to a change in Fitch's assessment of the
group's risk appetite. Aggressive expansion by the group into new or existing market segments that
compromise its risk-management practices would be negative for the ratings. Looser underwriting or
sustaining a more aggressive growth strategy over a long period could weaken the consolidated financial
profile, including funding and liquidity, and pressure the ratings.
There is little scope for the ratings to be upgraded unless the franchise were to strengthen significantly
relative to peers, which is not probable without increasing its risk appetite. Fitch expects HGL's ratings to
remain equalised with those of HBL over the next two years. However, bottom-up analysis of the group will
be required for HGL's ratings should HAG become a more material part of the group.
SUPPORT RATING AND SUPPORT RATING FLOOR FOR HBL
The Support Rating and Support Rating Floor of HBL are sensitive to any change in assumptions around
the propensity or ability of the New Zealand government to provide timely support.
HAG
Any change in the propensity or ability of HGL to provide support to HAG is likely to result in changes to
HAG's IDRs and Support Rating.
ESG Considerations
Unless otherwise disclosed in this section, the highest level of ESG credit relevance is a score of 3 - ESG
issues are credit neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on the entity, either due to their nature or the
way in which they are being managed by the entity.
For more information on our ESG Relevance Scores, visit www.fitchratings.com/esg
Additional information is available on www.fitchratings.com
10/25/2019Press Release
https://www.fitchratings.com/site/pr/10098565#4/6
FITCH RATINGS ANALYSTS
Primary Rating Analyst
George Hong
Director
+61 2 8256 0345
Fitch Australia Pty Ltd
Level 15 77 King Street
Sydney NSW 2000
Secondary Rating Analyst
Tim Roche
Senior Director
+61 2 8256 0310
Committee Chairperson
Heakyu Chang
Senior Director
+822 3278 8363
MEDIA CONTACTS
Leslie Tan
Singapore
+65 6796 7234
leslie.tan@thefitchgroup.com
Peter Hoflich
Singapore
+65 6796 7229
peter.hoflich@thefitchgroup.com
Applicable Criteria
Non-Bank Financial Institutions Rating Criteria (pub. 12 Oct 2018)
Bank Rating Criteria (pub. 12 Oct 2018)
Short-Term Ratings Criteria (pub. 02 May 2019)
Additional Disclosures
Dodd-Frank Rating Information Disclosure Form
Solicitation Status
Endorsement Policy
DISCLAIMER
ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE
READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK:
HTTPS://WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM/UNDERSTANDINGCREDITRATINGS. IN ADDITION, RATING
DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY'S
PUBLIC WEB SITE AT WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA, AND
10/25/2019Press Release
https://www.fitchratings.com/site/pr/10098565#5/6
METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH'S CODE OF CONDUCT,
CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE, AND OTHER
RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE CODE OF CONDUCT
SECTION OF THIS SITE. DIRECTORS AND SHAREHOLDERS RELEVANT INTERESTS ARE AVAILABLE
AT HTTPS://WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM/SITE/REGULATORY. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER
PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS
SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY
CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE.
COPYRIGHT
Copyright © 2019 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY
10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission
in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its
ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it
receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts
a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings
methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the
extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch's factual
investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the
rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is
offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information,
access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party
verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports,
engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of
independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the
particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch's ratings and reports should
understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all
of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete.
Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to
Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch
must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and
attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other
information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events
that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings
and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or
forecast was issued or affirmed.
The information in this report is provided "as is" without any representation or warranty of any kind, and
Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of
a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and
reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously
evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no
individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address
the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not
engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in
a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals
are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a
substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in
connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason
in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a
recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market
price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of
10/25/2019Press Release
https://www.fitchratings.com/site/pr/10098565#6/6
payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other
obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or
the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues
issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single
annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency
equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent
by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United
States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the
securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and
distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print
subscribers.
For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian
financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale
clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are
retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001
Fitch Ratings, Inc. is registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission as a Nationally
Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (the "NRSRO"). While certain of the NRSRO's credit rating
subsidiaries are listed on Item 3 of Form NRSRO and as such are authorized to issue credit ratings on
behalf of the NRSRO (see https://www.fitchratings.com/site/regulatory), other credit rating subsidiaries are
not listed on Form NRSRO (the "non-NRSROs") and therefore credit ratings issued by those subsidiaries
are not issued on behalf of the NRSRO. However, non-NRSRO personnel may participate in determining
credit ratings issued by or on behalf of the NRSRO.
SOLICITATION STATUS
The ratings above were solicited and assigned or maintained at the request of the rated entity/issuer or a
related third party. Any exceptions follow below.
Endorsement Policy
Fitch's approach to ratings endorsement so that ratings produced outside the EU may be used by regulated
entities within the EU for regulatory purposes, pursuant to the terms of the EU Regulation with respect to
credit rating agencies, can be found on the EU Regulatory Disclosures page. The endorsement status of all
International ratings is provided within the entity summary page for each rated entity and in the transaction
detail pages for all structured finance transactions on the Fitch website. These disclosures are updated on a
daily basis.
Fitch Updates Terms of Use & Privacy Policy
We have updated our Terms of Use and Privacy Policies which cover all of Fitch Group's websites. Learn more.
Data sourced from publicly available filings. Our datasets may not be complete. Automated analysis can produce errors. If you believe any data on this page is incorrect, please contact us at hello@nzxplorer.co.nz. For informational purposes only. Not investment advice.
Other issuers discussed similar conditions around this time
Matched by meaning across NZX announcement text, not keywords — based on our semantic index of announcement bodies.
- ANZ — ANZ Group Holdings Limited: ANZ Bank New Zealand Disclosure Statement2019-12-12
“REGISTERED BANK DISCLOSURES B1. GENERAL DISCLOSURES (continued) Other material matters Outcome of the RBNZ capital review On 14 December 2018, the RBNZ sought feedback on proposals to reform the amount of regulatory capital required of banks incorporated in New Zeal…”
- WBC — Westpac Banking Corporation: WNZL Disclosure Statement – 30 September 20192019-11-27
“Registered bank disclosures 88 Westpac New Zealand Limited i. General information (Unaudited) (continued) Auditor PricewaterhouseCoopers PricewaterhouseCoopers Tower 188 Quay Street Auckland, New Zealand Pending proceedings or arbitration A description of any pending legal pr…”
- WBC — Westpac Banking Corporation: WBC – NZ Banking Group Disclosure Statement – 30 Sep 20192019-11-29
“Registered bank disclosures 93 Westpac Banking Corporation - New Zealand Banking Group i. General information (Unaudited) (continued) Pending proceedings or arbitration On 20 November 2019, the Overseas Bank received a statement of claim from AUSTRAC (the Austra…”