Westpac Banking Corporation logo

Westpac 2019 Group Annual Report

Annual Report3 November 2019WBCFinancials

Help when
it matters.

2019

Annual Report

Westpac Group’s 2019 Reporting Suite
Westpac’s full 2019 reporting suite includes

the Group’s Annual Report, Full Year Financial

Results, Investor Discussion Pack, Annual

Review and Sustainability Report, Sustainability

Performance Report, Pillar 3 Report and other

shareholder information including a financial

calendar. For details, visit the Investor Centre

at westpac.com.au/investorcentre.

Annual ReportAnnual Review and

Sustainability Report

Sustainability

Performance Report

Help when

it matters.

2019

Annual Report

Help when

it matters.

2019

Annual Review &

Sustainability Report

Help when

it matters.

2019

Sustainability

Performance Report

Our commitment to helping started in 1817

when Westpac first opened its doors, helping

to build a fledgling colony’s diversified

economy and its own currency.

Helping is at the heart of what we do

and is central to our vision to become

one of the world’s great service

companies. Whether it’s helping

customers buy and pay off their homes,

manage their finances or kick start a

business – or by supporting them in

times of change or difficulty – we are

there to help in the moments that matter.

By getting service right, customers

benefit, the community benefits and

shareholders benefit.

Help when

it matters.

Cover image and this page:

Westpac’s 2019 ‘Baker of Beirut’ campaign

Westpac Banking Corporation

ABN 33 007 457 141

Performance highlights 2
Section 1 3

Chairman’s report 4

Chief Executive Officer’s letter 8

Information on Westpac 14

Significant developments 15

Directors’ report 26

Remuneration Report 44

Section 2 75

Five year summary 76

Reading this report 77

Review of Group operations 79

Income statement review 81

Balance sheet review 87

Capital resources 90

Divisional performance 93

Consumer 96

Business 97

Westpac Institutional Bank 98

Westpac New Zealand 99

Group Businesses 101

Risk and risk management 102

Risk factors 102

Risk management 113

Credit risk 114

Funding and liquidity risk 115

Market risk 116

Operational risk 116

Conduct and compliance risk 116

Governance risk 117

Risk culture 117

Strategic risk 117

Capital adequacy 118

Cyber risk 118

Reputation risk 118

Sustainability risk 118

Westpac’s approach to sustainability 121

Sustainability performance 121

Five year non-financial summary 130

Other Westpac business information 132

Section 3 135

Financial statements 136

Notes to the financial statements 142

Statutory statements 279

Section 4 289

Shareholding information 290

Additional information 300

Information for shareholders 304

Glossary of abbreviations and defined terms 307

Contact us inside back cover

In this Annual Report a reference to ‘Westpac’, ‘Group’, ‘Westpac Group’, ‘we’, ‘us’ and ‘our’ is to Westpac Banking Corporation ABN 33 007

457 141 and its subsidiaries unless it clearly means just Westpac Banking Corporation.

For certain information about the basis of preparing the financial information in this Annual Report see ‘Reading this report’ in Section 2. In

addition, this Annual Report contains statements that constitute ‘forward-looking statements’ within the meaning of Section 21E of the US

Securities Exchange Act of 1934. For an explanation of forward-looking statements and the risks, uncertainties and assumptions to which

they are subject, see ‘Reading this report’ in Section 2.

Information contained in or accessible through the websites mentioned in this Annual Report does not form part of this report unless

we specifically state that it is incorporated by reference and forms part of this report. All references in this report to websites are inactive

textual references and are for information only.

1

2019 Westpac Group Annual Report

1

2

3

4

Table of contents

4

Annual Report

Table of contents

Westpac Group’s 2019 Reporting Suite

Westpac’s full 2019 reporting suite includes

the Group’s Annual Report, Full Year Financial

Results, Investor Discussion Pack, Annual

Review and Sustainability Report, Sustainability

Performance Report, Pillar 3 Report and other

shareholder information including a financial

calendar. For details, visit the Investor Centre

at westpac.com.au/investorcentre.

Annual ReportAnnual Review and

Sustainability Report

Sustainability

Performance Report

Help when

it matters.

2019

Annual Report

Help when

it matters.

2019

Annual Review &

Sustainability Report

Help when

it matters.

2019

Sustainability

Performance Report

Our commitment to helping started in 1817

when Westpac first opened its doors, helping

to build a fledgling colony’s diversified

economy and its own currency.

Helping is at the heart of what we do

and is central to our vision to become

one of the world’s great service

companies. Whether it’s helping

customers buy and pay off their homes,

manage their finances or kick start a

business – or by supporting them in

times of change or difficulty – we are

there to help in the moments that matter.

By getting service right, customers

benefit, the community benefits and

shareholders benefit.

Help when

it matters.

Cover image and this page:

Westpac’s 2019 ‘Baker of Beirut’ campaign

Westpac Banking Corporation

ABN 33 007 457 141

22019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Performance highlights

6,346

6,991

5,936

6,751

7,561

8,012

7,445

7,990

8,095

6,784

Net profit after tax

1

($m)

10111213141516171819

Net profit after tax $6,784 million, down 16%

5,879

6,301

6,564

7,063

7,628

7,820

7,822

8,0628,065

6,849

Cash earnings

2

($m)

10111213141516171819

Cash earnings $6,849 million, down 15%

197.8

209.3

214.8

227.8

245.4

248.2

235.5

239.7

236.2

198.2

Cash earnings per ordinary share

2,4

(cents)

10111213141516171819

Cash earnings per ordinary share, down 16%

139

156

166

174

20

182

187188188188

174

Dividends per ordinary share (cents)

10111213141516171819

Special dividends

Dividends $1.74, down 14 cents

16.116.0

15.4

15.9

16.4

15.8

14.0

13.8

13.0

10.8

Cash earnings to average ordinary equity

2,3

(%)

10111213141516171819

Returns 10.8%, down 225bps

% change

201920182019/2018

Reported earnings

Net profit after tax

1

($m)6,784 8,095 (16%)

Earnings per share (cents)196.5 237.5 (17%)

Dividends per share (cents)174 188 (7%)

Return on equity

3

(%)10.7 13.1 (240bps)

Expense to income ratio (%)48.9 43.8 Large

Common Equity Tier 1 capital ratio (%)10.7 10.6 4bps

Cash earnings basis

2


Cash earnings ($m)6,849 8,065 (15%)

Cash earnings per share (cents)198.2 236.2 (16%)

Cash earnings return on equity (%)

3

10.8 13.0 (225bps)

Economic profit

5

($m)1,619 3,444 (53%)

1. Net profit attributable to ordinary equity holders.

2. The adjustments to our reported results to derive cash earnings are described in Note 2 of our 2019 financial statements.

3. Return on average ordinary equity.

4. Periods prior to 2015 have not been restated for the bonus element of the 2015 share entitlement offer.

5. Economic profit represents the excess of adjusted cash earnings over a minimum required rate of return on equity invested. For

this purpose, adjusted cash earnings is defined as cash earnings plus the estimated value of franking credits paid to shareholders.

The calculation of economic profit is described in more detail in Section 5 of Westpac’s Full Year 2019 Results (incorporating the

requirements of Appendix 4E) lodged with the ASX on 4 November 2019 (the’ASX Announcement’).

Performance highlights

3
2019 Westpac Group Annual Report

1

2

3

4


Chairman’s report

Chief Executive Officer’s letter

Information on Westpac

Directors’ report

(including Remuneration Report)

01

This year
has been

a challenging

period

Lindsay Maxsted

Chairman

42019 Westpac Group Annual Report

A challenging year

This year has been a challenging period for the financial

services sector, and for Westpac. At an industry

level, the repercussions from the Royal Commission

into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and

Financial Services Industry (Royal Commission) have

continued, self-assessments into governance, culture

and accountability have been completed, and there has

been an increase in regulatory actions and remediation

costs. The operating environment has also become

more difficult with lower economic growth, historically

low interest rates, and even more competition from

international banks, non-banks and niche players.

Despite the challenges presented by the environment,

our capital remains above the Australian Prudential

Regulation Authority’s (APRA) unquestionably strong

benchmark, our funding and liquidity is sound, and

our customer franchise is healthy with a market share

of around 20% across most of the major segments in

which we operate. At the same time we have been rated

the most sustainable bank in Australia (and rated 9th in

world) by the Dow Jones Sustainability Index.

Noting our overall position, we do however face a

number of challenges. Over the last 12 months we have

faced into these, sought to work through the issues

and commenced a number of programs to further

strengthen our position – particularly in enhancing our

approach to governance and risk management. We will

continue to do so.

Royal Commission

Last year in my letter to you I spoke about the impact

of the Royal Commission and the lessons for Westpac.

These were:

(1) that we were slow to focus on non-financial risks

such as conduct, compliance and reputation;

(2) we did not fully appreciate the underlying risks in

the financial planning business; and

(3) that some remuneration arrangements inadvertently

contributed to poor behaviour.

Having identified many of our shortcomings last year,

our focus this year has been on fixing the issues and

beginning to restore the trust that you and customers

have placed in us. Dealing with these lessons in reverse

order, we have already made a number of changes

in remuneration across the organisation to reduce

potential conflicts and ensure the right incentives are

in place for employees. We’ve also made changes to

executive remuneration – which I discuss further below.

In relation to the second lesson, in March this year,

following a detailed review, we announced our decision

Chairman’s report

Five year summary

1

to exit the financial planning business. As part of this

change we ceased providing personal financial advice

by salaried financial advisers under our own brands

and discontinued the practice of enabling independent

advice groups to operate under our licence.

On non-financial risks, in addition to some of the

findings of the Royal Commission we completed a

detailed analysis through our Culture Governance and

Accountability (CGA) self-assessment. This report was

produced for the Board and APRA and provided a

thorough assessment of our strengths and weaknesses

in risk culture, governance and accountability. The

report was prepared by a dedicated team supported by

Oliver Wyman (a global independent expert in financial

services) and is available on our website.

The CGA self-assessment indicated that “Westpac’s

governance, accountability and culture settings, in their

totality generally support sound management of the

Group’s non-financial risks.” The report also highlighted

that “Westpac’s management of non-financial risks...

remains generally less mature than its management of

financial risks and this factor is likely near, or at the root

cause of many of Westpac’s non-financial risk related

issues.”

In other findings, the report indicated that some of

Westpac’s strengths had side effects that impacted the

Group’s culture. For example, the Group’s strong focus

on financial risk has contributed to an “organisational

imperative for safety” and a tendency to over-analyse

issues. On the face of it this could be a strength for a

large financial institution however, these characteristics

have also meant that we have tended to be slow in

decision-making and weak on execution.

Enhancing Governance

In response to the findings of our CGA self-assessment,

we have commenced a detailed program of work to

fix the issues. This work is also aligned with our Royal

Commission Response plan.

While there is still much to do we have nevertheless

made significant progress:

• Of the 45 recommendations in our CGA self-

assessment, 40% have now been implemented.

• Of the 49 Royal Commission recommendations that

require action by to us, 11 have been implemented

and progress is underway with a further 11. The

remaining 27 recommendations require further

clarity or legislative change before we can fully

progress but we are doing all we can now.

5
2019 Westpac Group Annual Report

1

2

3

4

Chairman’s report

Reading this report

I want to highlight that the Board sees these changes

as a positive and necessary investment in Westpac’s

long term sustainability and we are monitoring progress

closely. However I do not want to underestimate the

task ahead of us. It is complex and it will take some

time before we can claim completion. That said, we are

determined to invest what is necessary to complete our

plans and build an even more sustainable organisation.

Shareholders should also be aware that the increase

in scrutiny may result in further regulatory action and

litigation against your company. We will continue to

investigate these matters fully and impartially and where

we recognise we have done the wrong thing we will

take responsibility; and if customers have been affected

we will put things right. There will at times however be

genuine disagreement with regulators and in those cases

we will continue to engage constructively.

Financial Performance

This year our financial performance was disappointing.

While we have continued to grow the balance sheet,

and customer numbers, the significant costs associated

with remediating customers, improving governance

and responding to regulatory change have contributed

to a reduction in earnings. Brian will deal with financial

performance in more detail in his letter but let me cover

the key points.

Reported net profit in Full Year 2019 was $6,784 million

down from $8,095 million in 2018. Cash earnings (our

preferred measure of performance) for the year ended

30 September 2019 was $6,849 million, 15% lower than

the 2018 financial year.

To put performance in perspective, of the $1,216 million

decline in cash earnings, $849 million was due to higher

costs associated with customer remediation and costs

associated with exiting financial planning, what we

have called ‘notable items’. The remaining decline was

mainly due to lower interest margins, a decline in wealth

management and insurance revenue and increased

regulatory and compliance costs.

On the balance sheet liquidity, funding and credit

quality remain strong. Our key liquidity ratios continue

to remain comfortably above regulatory minimums and

we have maintained a sound funding mix.

Credit quality has continued to be a highlight with

all elements of the portfolio in good shape. The ratio

of stressed assets to total committed exposures has

remained near cyclical lows at 1.20%, while impaired

assets represent just 0.25% of total lending. There has

been some increase in consumer delinquencies over the

last couple of years consistent with the softening in the

economy but this is not unexpected.

Capital

Reflecting our priority for strength, Westpac has

materially strengthened its capital position over many

years with our ordinary equity almost doubling since

2009 while our asset base has increased by closer to

50% - a material reduction in gearing. Our CET1 capital

ratio started the decade below 7% and at September

2019 was 10.67%.

Despite this position, the lower earnings and a variety

of changes in the calculation of the components of the

CET1 capital ratio (CET1 capital and risk weighted assets)

has meant that, absent any action on our behalf, we

would not have had a sufficient buffer above APRA’s

unquestionably strong benchmark of 10.5%. As a result,

the Board has taken the decision to raise capital through

an institutional placement and a share purchase plan to

raise around $2.5 billion.

The raising is expected to lift the Group’s capital ratios

by around 58

1

basis points giving us extra capacity to

support customers, including if the economy weakens,

while increasing the buffer for any additional factors

that may impact capital in the period ahead, including

regulatory actions, litigation or changes in APRA or

RBNZ capital requirements.

Dividends

The Board also took the difficult decision this half to

reduce the final 2019 dividend to 80 cents per share,

fully franked. This is a 15% reduction on both the final

2018 dividend and the interim 2019 dividend of 94 cents

per share. This dividend represents a final dividend pay

out ratio of 79% and a dividend yield of 5.4% (before

franking).

This brings the full year dividend to 174 cents per share,

down from 188 cents per share in 2018.

There were a number of factors that led to the decision

to reduce the dividend and we recognise the impact

on shareholders, but as a Board we must continue to

prioritise strength and make decisions that we believe

are in the best long term interests of the company.

In setting the dividend, the Group seeks to maintain

a payout ratio that is sustainable, which we currently

assess as being around 70-75%. While the final dividend

payout ratio is above this level, if we exclude the notable

items referred to earlier, the payout ratio, on a cash

earnings basis, is 71%.

1. Based on risk weighted assets as at 30 September 2019, a 46

basis point increase reflects the impact of the placement only of

$2 billion, while a 58 basis point increase reflects the impact of

both the placement and the share purchase plan, assuming the

share purchase plan raises $500 million (the basis point impacts

are net of issue costs).

62019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Chairman’s report

It is also worth highlighting that the Bank Levy has

continued to weigh on earnings and on returns to

shareholders. This year, the Bank Levy was equivalent to

around 8 cents per share (4 cents per share each half).

The Bank Levy is based on the size of certain liabilities,

not on earnings. Accordingly while earnings were lower

this year, the Bank Levy was higher.

The final ordinary dividend will be paid on 20 December

2019 with the record date of 13 November 2019.

Remuneration

At our 2018 AGM, we received a significant vote against

the adoption of our 2018 Remuneration Report and,

as a result, incurred a ‘first strike’. In accordance with

Australia’s Corporations Act, if we receive a ‘second

strike’ against our 2019 Remuneration Report, a

separate resolution must be put to shareholders at the

2019 AGM asking if they wish to hold an extraordinary

general meeting, known as a ‘spill meeting’.

The Board and I recognise that our decisions on

executive remuneration in 2018 were not in line

with shareholder expectations. In response, we

have consulted extensively over the year to better

understand shareholder views and act on their

feedback. We met with groups of individuals with

the help of the Australian Shareholders’ Association

and we held a number of meetings with institutional

shareholders and advisory groups. I have also received

significant correspondence from shareholders. I greatly

appreciate the time that shareholders have taken to

share their thoughts directly with me and your Board.

In my letter to shareholders accompanying the interim

dividend earlier this year, I explained that the key

concern of shareholders was that your Board did not

apply sufficient discretion to short-term variable reward

(STVR) outcomes in 2018, given Westpac’s flat financial

performance in 2018 and the significant risk and

reputation matters that arose.

Shareholders also provided feedback on the overall

quantum of executive pay, the use of a fair value

allocation methodology to determine the award value of

long-term variable reward and the lack of variability in

short-term variable reward to executives over time.

In response to this feedback, combined with your

Board’s assessment, we made a number of changes

to executive remuneration outcomes this year. The

remuneration report discusses these in more detail,

however the key features of remuneration in 2019

include:

• The CEO has not received any STVR this year. At the

same time, the CEO has had no increase in his base

pay, and indeed he has not had an increase in his

base pay since he commenced the role in 2015.

• Group Executives received between 0% and 83% of

their STVR.

• The Board used its discretion to apply downward

remuneration adjustments to two Group Executives

and two former Group Executives in response

to material risk and compliance matters that

impacted the Group. These adjustments reduced

2019 STVR outcomes to zero for the two former

Group Executives. Many of these adjustments

related to events from prior periods. In addition, the

Board exercised its discretion to apply downward

adjustments to a portion of deferred STVR for two

former Group Executives.

• No LTVR vested for the CEO and Group Executives

in 2019 as performance hurdles were not met.

These awards typically make up around one third

of each of the CEO’s or a Group Executive’s total

remuneration; and

• Director base fees were reduced by 20% for all

current Non-executive Directors for the 2019

financial year.

Changes have also been made to 2020 remuneration

structures including the removal of a fair value

allocation methodology (and moving to face value)

to determine the number of performance share

rights issued under the LTVR to the CEO and Group

Executives. This change contributes to a reduction in

the total target remuneration of the CEO and Group

Executives by 23% and 12.5%, respectively.

We will continue to assess our approach to

remuneration, taking into account shareholder feedback

and new requirements which are being developed by

APRA.

Further details on Westpac’s 2019 performance,

governance and remuneration outcomes, is available

in our 2019 Annual Report and our Annual Review and

Sustainability Report.

7
2019 Westpac Group Annual Report

1

2

3

4

Chairman’s report

Board renewal

Over recent years, your Board has undergone

significant renewal and I am confident the Board has

the right mix of skills, experience and diversity to

guide our business. This year we welcomed two new

members to the Board: Margie Seale and Steve Harker.

Margie has already proven to be a valuable addition

to your Board with over 25 years of senior executive

experience in both Australia and internationally. With a

background in consumer goods and global publishing,

Margie also has direct experience in how digital can

disrupt traditional businesses, which is of great value to

your Board.

Steve Harker has strengthened the Board’s banking

and financial services skills, with a particular focus on

investment and institutional banking. Prior to joining

the Board, Steve was Vice Chairman of Morgan Stanley

Australia and was Managing Director of Morgan Stanley

Australia for almost 20 years.

The Board’s commitment

In closing, I would like to reiterate a point from last year’s

report that your Board is here to represent shareholders

and we shall unashamedly continue to do so, including

striving to provide you with the best possible returns on

your investment over the long-term.

We recognise that we still have work to do to rebuild the

platform that will improve Westpac’s sustainability and

restore the trust that you, the community and customers

have placed in us – our role will be to ensure that the

plans we have put in place will be followed through.

Finally, while the Board has been disappointed with the

findings of the Royal Commission and the CGA self-

assessment we recognise that Westpac is a truly special

company. Westpac is Australia’s oldest company with a

deep history of not only supporting its customers but

supporting the nation and the communities in which

we operate. A key part of Westpac’s progress is the

incredible people whose hard work and dedication I see

every day. It is these same people that will see Westpac

emerge from this environment as an even stronger,

sustainable company.

Lindsay Maxsted

Chairman

Chief Executive Officer’s letter
The year ahead

will continue to be

challenging

Brian Hartzer

Chief Executive Officer

82019 Westpac Group Annual Report

Chief Executive Officer’s letter

Dear Shareholder,

The 2019 financial year was a watershed year for the

banking industry, and for Westpac. In response to

the issues highlighted by the Royal Commission

1

and

our Culture, Governance, and Accountability (CGA)

self-assessment

2

, various regulatory actions across

the industry, and a rapidly evolving competitive

environment, we have made significant changes to the

way we serve customers, to our business structure, and

in the technology we use to support our people and our

customers.

These changes include the implementation of the new

Banking Code of Practice; new policies and approaches

for supporting vulnerable customers; the decision to

exit our financial planning business; the implementation

of a number of new controls and compliance processes,

particularly in lending; and the roll-out of a major new

technology system—the Customer Service Hub—that

provides the foundation for improving both service

quality and cost over the next several years.

We also booked significant provisions for customer

remediation payments and costs associated with our

former financial planning network and various other

operational issues we identified as part of our ‘get it

right, put it right’ initiative.

Externally, we confronted the impact of significantly

lower interest rates and a substantial fall in demand for

lending. This coincided with increased competition from

both traditional and new competitors, many of whom

are being enabled by advances in digital and mobile

technology.

Due to these and other factors, our financial

performance for the year was disappointing. I am

acutely aware of the faith you place in us to look after

your investment and deliver acceptable returns—

including dividends. And I would like to assure you that,

despite the unusually large number of challenges we

faced this year, your management team is committed

to investing in the changes needed to build a more

sustainable business and deliver superior returns over

time.

As part of this commitment, we made further progress

on our aspiration to be one of the world’s great service

companies. This included improvements in service

quality, digital transformation, productivity, and service

culture. While much work remains, we finish this year

stronger than we started, with a clear plan and a high

quality, motivated workforce who are committed to

improving execution and getting things done.

As in previous years, my goal with this letter is to

explain what happened this year, what we have

achieved, and where we have fallen short. I also want

to address the changing strategic environment that

we face and how we are adapting so we emerge from

this period as the best positioned bank to deliver

sustainable returns into the future.

I’ve organised this letter to respond to the following

questions:

(1) What drove financial performance this year?

(2) Why are we raising capital?

(3) How are we progressing on our key priorities?

(4) How are we improving non-financial risks, culture,

and governance?

(5) How is the market evolving, and what are our

priorities to respond?

(6) What is the outlook for 2020?

1. What drove financial performance this

year?

We consider financial performance across four

dimensions: strength, return, productivity, and growth.

To be sustainable, banks must strike the right balance

across all these dimensions – and we have had

reasonable success on each.

Balance sheet strength will always be our number

one priority. The lessons of the 1991 recession (the

importance of strong credit risk disciplines) and the

2008 Global Financial Crisis (the importance of strong

funding, liquidity, and capital) are alive and well.

Credit quality remained sound over the year, although

as expected we did see a moderate deterioration in

delinquencies on housing loans, with 0.88% of loan

balances more than 90 days past due. This mostly

reflects some increase in stress and a slowdown

in housing turnover in certain parts of the country,

increasing the time it takes for people to clear their

loans when they need to sell. Our institutional bank

impaired assets to total exposure remain very low at

just 0.08%, while in business lending, impaired assets to

total exposure were up just 3 basis points to 0.62% over

the last 6 months. In New Zealand, the picture is similar

with impaired assets to total exposure just 0.08%, with

the ratio almost halving over the year. The quality of our

credit book meant that impairment charges declined

2% to $794 million, representing 11 basis points of gross

loans.

We finished the year with a strong funding and liquidity

position, which provides resilience in the event of

market disruption. We fully funded new lending with

1. Officially, “The Royal Commission into Misconduct in the

Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry”

2. Westpac’s Culture, Governance and Accountability self-

assessment (CGA) was produced for the Westpac Board and

APRA. A copy is available on our website.

9
2019 Westpac Group Annual Report

1

2

3

4

Chief Executive Officer’s letter

customer deposits, and our Net Stable Funding ratio

(which measures the proportion of our funding that

comes from ‘sticky’ deposits and other long-term

funding sources) was 112%—well above the 100%

regulatory minimum. At the end of September, we held

$144 billion in cash and other liquid assets, representing

127% of our short-term liabilities (the Liquidity Coverage

Ratio).

Our Common equity tier 1 capital ratio finished the year

at 10.7%, and above APRA’s ‘unquestionably strong’

benchmark (I will discuss our capital position in more

detail later in this letter).

Turning to returns, our overall financial result for FY19

was disappointing. Reported profit was down 16% to

$6,784 million and cash earnings were $6,849 million in

FY19, down 15% or $1,216 million.

Performance was significantly impacted by notable

items of $1,130 million (after tax) in FY19—$849 million

higher than the previous year and accounting for most

of the decline in cash earnings. These notable items

largely reflect provisions we’ve set aside for customer

remediation and costs associated with exiting our

financial planning business.

Excluding notable items, cash earnings were $367

million lower—down 4% compared to FY18. This decline

was mostly due to a 7 basis-point decline in margins to

2.16% as a consequence of a lower Treasury contribution

and an extremely competitive environment.

Earnings were also impacted by lower revenue in

wealth management, and insurance. In wealth, revenue

was down following the exit of our financial planning

business, the removal of grandfathered commissions,

the migration of MySuper accounts and the decision to

reprice platform margins—each of which hurts revenue

in the short term but supports customers and helps us

build a more sustainable business. The lower Insurance

income was primarily due to higher claims particularly

from the severe weather events (Qld storms and NSW

hailstorms) experienced early in 2019.

Given the challenging environment, productivity was

a major focus this year. We achieved our productivity

goal by delivering $405 million in savings. This reflected

the continued progress on our digital agenda—as

customers shift to self-service and we automate manual

processes—as well as better supplier management and

the implementation of a simpler management structure

across the Group.

Growth this year—particularly balance sheet growth—

was relatively slow, reflecting lower credit demand in

the economy, our risk appetite, and the decision to

prioritise margin. In housing, we also implemented a

number of changes to our loan assessment approach,

and unfortunately, did so in a way that made the

application process harder than it needed to be. Given

industry competition, some customers and brokers

diverted their business elsewhere – and our lending

slowed.

In response, we’re working hard to simplify our

processes, with a number of improvements already

rolled out. As a result, we expect home lending to

contract early in the year but to be growing in line with

the system by the end of the 2020 financial year.

Small business growth has also been affected by more

onerous lending requirements, given the links between

many small business customers’ personal and business

finances. Credit demand was also weaker among larger

customers—including corporates—but this was more

a function of weaker business sentiment and a softer

economic outlook.

The reduction in cash earnings, and an increase in the

strength of our capital base, meant that the return on

equity declined to 10.75%—down over 2 percentage

points over the year. Given the importance of capital

as a driver of return on equity, it is important to

understand why we are raising capital at this point.

2. Why are we raising capital?

Our common equity tier 1 (CET1) capital ratio of

10.7% remains well above the 8% minimum regulatory

requirement and is ahead of APRA’s unquestionably

strong benchmark. We hold around $46 billion in

common equity, up $7 billion over the last three years.

That capital provides the backing to absorb losses in

the event of a downturn and forms part of the funding

pool for our lending. In addition, banks with high capital

backing are generally rewarded with higher credit

ratings, which make it cheaper to borrow in capital

markets, particularly offshore.

The complexity comes in the way regulators assess our

capital position—usually through the ratio of capital

to risk-weighted assets (the CET1 capital ratio). From

time-to-time regulators recalibrate how they measure

risk-weighted assets, and what should be included, or

excluded, from the capital base. This in turn can reduce

the reported capital ratio, despite the actual dollar

amount of capital going up. In addition, earlier in the

year APRA applied a $500 million capital overlay to

Westpac (and other Major banks) until such time as we

complete the actions from our CGA self-assessment.

This overlay translated into a further reduction in our

CET1 capital ratio of 16 basis points.

At the end of September, our CET1 capital ratio would

have been around 75 basis points higher had it not

been for such developments. Looking ahead, we

face continued uncertainty around APRA’s capital

requirements, the potential for further regulatory

actions and costs, and the earnings headwinds of low

1. Based on risk weighted assets as at 30 September 2019, a 46
basis point increase reflects the impact of the placement only of

$2 billion, while a 58 basis point increase reflects the impact of

both the placement and the share purchase plan, assuming the

share purchase plan raises $500 million (the basis point impacts

are net of issue costs).

10

2019 Westpac Group Annual Report

Chief Executive Officer’s letter

interest rates and higher compliance costs. Furthermore,

the Reserve Bank of New Zealand is currently proposing

to significantly increase the capital requirements for

New Zealand Banks (although the amount of the

increase is yet to be finalised).

Given our priority for balance sheet strength, we

concluded that the prudent course of action was to

seek to raise $2.5 billion in capital, which increases

our CET1 capital ratio by around 58

1

basis points. This

capital is expected to increase our buffer above APRA’s

unquestionably strong benchmark of 10.5% and position

us to respond to potential future impacts on capital

(indicated above) and continue to lend and support the

economy in the event of a downturn.

Our decision to reduce the dividend to 80 cents per

share was not easy, as we know that many shareholders

rely on our dividends for income. In addition, we carry

a substantial balance of franking credits that we would

like to distribute to our shareholders. However, with

increased shares on issue and downward pressure on

returns, we felt it was prudent to bring our payout to

a range that allows us to retain sufficient capital to

support future growth.

3. How are we progressing on our

strategic priorities?

In my letter last year, I identified three priorities for the

year ahead:

• Deal with outstanding issues;

• Maintain momentum in our customer franchise; and

• Structural cost reduction.

Deal with outstanding issues

In recent years a number of issues have emerged

relating to past business practices, operational errors,

gaps in compliance, or changes in regulation. These

were identified through the Royal Commission, our CGA

self-assessment, ongoing product reviews, and various

regulatory actions. The faster we resolve these issues,

the sooner we can refocus investment and management

attention on delivering more for customers, thereby

increasing the value of our franchise.

The most significant change over the year was the

exit of our financial planning business and reducing

our operating divisions from five to four. The financial

planning business had been loss-making for some time

and so this change is expected to be EPS positive in

2020. Exiting the business came with an immediate

shut-down cost, but this will be quickly offset by cost

savings and reduced risk. Our remaining Insurance,

Superannuation, Investments, Platforms and Private

Wealth businesses have been integrated into our

Consumer and Business divisions.

Customer remediation was another area of focus. Over

the course of the year we continued to work through

a backlog of historical issues in our financial planning

and banking businesses and we continue to work with

regulators to agree on a fair and reasonable approach

to remediation.

The most significant of these issues is the so-called “fee

for no service” issue in financial planning.

Under the “Future of Financial Advice” (FOFA)

legislation introduced in 2012, financial planning

businesses were required to eliminate ‘conflicted

remuneration’ (commission) payments to planners and

move to a fee-for-service model. As part of this, BT

implemented systems (including new contracts, new

technology, and an annual fee disclosure statement)

seeking to ensure customers received the advice

services they were paying for. However, as with other

financial planning businesses, we identified some

incidences of advice not being provided and cases

where insufficient records were retained to meet

regulator expectations.

We have therefore been working through a process

to review our customer files and repay customers

where appropriate. This issue is more complex in the

case of aligned dealer group planners, who operated

separately, but under our licence. This was a standard

industry practice, where companies like BT provided

licensing and back-office services to planning groups.

In these cases, we face significant logistical challenges

in obtaining and checking all the historical files of those

non-Westpac advisers, particularly if they have left the

industry.

Other remediation matters include instances where

we didn’t meet certain reporting standards, or made

administrative or operational errors in certain products.

We have established a dedicated remediation hub

to streamline the process of refunding customers.

Currently there are around 750 staff dedicated to

remediation activities, and since 2017 we have paid out

$350m in compensation to customers.

Beyond remediation, our response to the findings of

the Royal Commission and our CGA self-assessment

are well underway. We have implemented 11

recommendations as part of our Royal Commission

program with a further 11 currently being implemented.

We have commenced work on most of the remaining 27

recommendations that presently apply to us, but we will

need to wait until the government passes the required

legislation before we can fully progress the bulk of

these. With our CGA action plan, we have implemented

40% of the recommendations and we expect to

implement the remainder by March 2021. Changes we

have made so far include centralising our complaints

management, enhancing consequence management

and remuneration governance, and introducing new

board and committee processes.

Maintaining momentum in our customer franchise

The long-term success of our business depends on the

strength and depth of our customer relationships. In

2019 we continued to improve our service offering and

the technology needed to deliver better service in the

future.

11
2019 Westpac Group Annual Report

1

2

3

4

Chief Executive Officer’s letter

These and other changes have materially improved

system stability with no major system outages in

FY19—a big step up when you consider just a few years

ago we experienced one or two major issues a month.

Further changes and upgrades are planned that will

further improve the experience for customers and

enable more efficient processes for our bankers.

At the same time, competition has intensified, especially

in the mortgage business. As I indicated earlier,

stepping out of line with the market quickly impacts

market share. This happened to us in the latter part of

the FY19, although we expect this to normalise through

the year ahead.

Increasing structural productivity

Using technology to drive down costs is an important

part of our strategy to remain competitive and deliver

good returns over time. This is increasingly important

in a low-rate, slow-growth environment where margins

are under pressure and regulatory and compliance costs

are rising. At the same time, emerging competitors

have no physical networks to support and have a cost

advantage in delivering some products.

This year our $405 million in productivity savings

through a company-wide focus on simplification,

automation, and digitisation was up one-third on

the productivity savings delivered last year. Part of

this reflects the benefits from prior investments in

digitisation and automation, while a continued shift of

customers from physical to digital channels allowed

us to rationalise 61 branches and reduce ATM numbers

by 375.

Physical presence continues to be important for

many customers and we are investing to upgrade our

branch network in high-volume locations. However,

changing customer traffic patterns into regional

centres and the increasing use of contactless cards

and mobile payments mean that we need fewer, well

located branches to meet demand. To further improve

efficiency, we have entered into an agreement to

sell most of our ‘off-site’ ATM network to a third-

party. This agreement materially retains the level of

service Westpac customers currently receive from our

ATM network but will allow us to benefit from scale

efficiencies that this third party can achieve with their

other cash processing.

Other cost initiatives during the year included

renegotiating supplier arrangements, further

automating back-office operations, and simplifying our

organisational structure. In total, these changes resulted

in a net 5% reduction in full-time equivalent headcount

across the company, despite adding significant

extra resources to support the remediation activities

described above.

Increased compliance, regulatory, and remediation costs

along with revenue headwinds mean that productivity

benefits are not yet visible in traditional measures of

bank productivity, such as the cost-to-income ratio.

However I am confident that, as these programs and

the related costs roll off over the next few years,

the improved efficiency and competitiveness of our

underlying business will become apparent.

In recent years we have built a strong service ethos

throughout the company. Employees participate at least

weekly in service ‘huddles’, where we review our service

standards, share stories and examples of good service,

and discuss where we can improve. This reinforces our

customer-first approach and is further supported by

embedding customer satisfaction and related service

metrics in individual scorecards and performance

rewards.

A focus this year was on improving our ability to

identify and support vulnerable customers. This

included setting up a new Customer Vulnerability

Council, making changes to various complaints policies,

and rolling out training to our people on how to identify

customers experiencing vulnerability. We promoted

this through our Westpac “Help when it matters”

advertising, with campaigns around relationship

breakdown, loss of a loved one, and the impact of

natural disasters.

Our continued focus on service has led to a 2% rise in

customers to 11.2 million in Australia. In business, we

held our #1 NPS

1

ranking in each of our key segments

and increased our lead on #2 while in consumer, we

rank #3 on NPS

1

and closed the gap to #1.

In technology, we delivered several new digital

innovations to make things better for customers. These

included our AI chat-bot ‘Red’, which can respond in

real time to customer enquiries, a fully digital mortgage

process for St.George customers, a new Digital

Institutional Bank platform, an online pricing platform

for term deposits, and an extensive rollout of the real

time New Payments Platform which has seen us process

around 40% of the flows on this platform. Around

40% of our digital sales are now completed online – a

material uplift from just a few years ago.

We have also completed major upgrades to our

technology infrastructure that have improved reliability

and will ultimately enable us to deliver even more for

customers. These include:

• Launching our ‘Customer Service Hub’, a modern

platform for originating and servicing mortgages

and other consumer banking products;

• Rolling out a new data platform that supports the

Government’s ‘Open Banking’ regulations and will

allow us to better understand customer needs;

• Completing the rollout of Panorama, our market-

leading investment platform for independent

financial advisors and their clients; and

• Renewing much of our underlying network and

data centre infrastructure. This included moving

over 600 applications to the new environment and

upgrading over 300 applications hosted on legacy

infrastructure.

1. For details on metric definition and provider please refer to the

2019 Full Year Results Presentation & Investor Discussion Pack

available at www.westpac.com.au

2. BEAR: The Bank Executive Accountability Regime, administered

by APRA

122019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Chief Executive Officer’s letter

4. How are we strengthening non-financial

risk, governance, and accountability?

The findings of the Royal Commission and our CGA

self-assessment highlighted a number of areas where

we need to improve non-financial risk management,

governance, and accountability. To address these,

several major programs of work are under way, with

specific actions being tracked and reported at both the

Group Executive level and to the Board.

Specific areas of focus include:

• Improving the identification, escalation, and

resolution of non-financial risk issues across the

Group, with a particular focus on financial crime-

related issues;

• Enhancing our end-to-end lending processes;

• Providing more detailed reporting on operational

and compliance incidents to the Executive team and

Board;

• Improving the efficiency and effectiveness of

committee meetings;

• Clarifying and strengthening resources under

the ‘Three Lines of Defence’ approach to risk

management;

• Clarifying individual accountability for all managers,

in line with the new BEAR

2

regime; and

• Improving awareness and protection for whistle-

blowers.

In addition, we continue to enhance and reinforce

general risk awareness across the Group.

5. How is the market evolving, and what

are our priorities to respond?

In 2015 we recognised that a once-in-a-generation

change in banking was underway, as a consequence

of changing customer behaviour, new technology, new

competitors, and increased community and regulatory

expectations. Over the past year, these trends have

accelerated. In particular, we see:

• An increasing shift to digital self-service among

customers;

• Increased competition, especially in mortgages, from

foreign and regional banks who rely on mortgage

brokers for their sales;

• The rise of digital-only competitors;

• The growth of fintech businesses offering new, data-

driven services;

• Increased compliance costs and capital requirements

across traditional banking businesses; and

• Continued reputational challenges for banks as

a result of issues identified through the Royal

Commission.

While these challenges are significant—particularly in

the short term—we believe the longer-term outlook for

a large bank like Westpac remains positive given:

• The size and strength of our balance sheet

(especially our deposit base and diverse funding

sources);

• The quality and scale of our customer franchise,

including our portfolio of brands and extensive data

assets;

• The financial resources and skills required to build

the technical innovations and partnerships required

in a digital world;

• Our ability to meet ever-rising regulatory

expectations; and

• Our ability to attract and retain top quality talent in

a small market, given our reputation as an employer

of choice.

We recognise that we are a service business: We’ve set

the goal for Westpac to be “one of the world’s great

service companies, helping our customers, communities

and our people to prosper and grow.”

To grow the long-term value of the company, our

strategy is to build scale in customer relationships

through the provision of world-class service; supported

by a strong balance sheet, great people, and a modern,

highly efficient technology platform, as well as a

network of partnerships among new, digitally-savvy

competitors and suppliers.

To bring this strategy to life, we are continuing to deliver

on a multi-year investment program we call the “Service

Revolution”, designed to strengthen our competitive

offers and reshape the capabilities and cost structure of

the company. This program is organised around three

themes:

• Performance disciplines: Prudently managing our

capital, funding, and liquidity; seeking to maintain a

superior ROE to the peer average while remaining

targeted and disciplined on asset growth and credit

quality;

• Service leadership: Continuing to grow the Group’s

customer base while increasing the quality and

depth of those relationships, as measured through

the number of customers who view us as their

main financial institution. We look to achieve this by

delivering world-class service levels (both personal

and digital), as measured by NPS; recognising that

a great service business requires a high quality, well-

trained, diverse, and engaged workforce; and

• Digital transformation: Using technology to

materially improve efficiency and reduce the Group’s

cost-to-income ratio below 40% in the medium-

term. This will include migrating more sales and

service activity to digital, reshaping the Group’s

distribution network, modernising underlying

technology platforms, and building an extensive

network of digital partnerships and data assets.

While we will continue to deliver this program of work

over several years, we have set a number of specific

priorities over the next couple of years. These are:

1. Service leadership:

• Extend our #1 in NPS

1

for business

• Close the gap to the #1 major bank in consumer

2. Digital transformation:

• Complete roll-out of the Customer Service Hub

to all our mortgage bankers and to external

brokers

• Launch a new mobile banking app with improved

usability and functionality

• Launch Open Banking data capabilities

• Drive digital sales to 45% across the Group

1. For details on metric definition and provider please refer to the

2019 Full Year Results Presentation & Investor Discussion Pack

available at www.westpac.com.au

13
2019 Westpac Group Annual Report

1

2

3

4

Chief Executive Officer’s letter

For banks, the environment remains challenging.

Interest rates at these low levels put significant pressure

on margins, as many deposits are essentially at a

‘floor’ beyond which they can’t be repriced down. In

addition, earnings on invested capital and liquidity are

progressively lower as the portfolio rolls-over to much

lower interest rates.

Regulatory actions—flowing from the Royal Commission

and other industry reviews and investigations—

will continue to require significant investment and

management attention. Regulators have substantially

stepped up their resources and enforcement activity,

leading to a dramatic increase in our own costs as we

respond to the various enquiries, make improvements in

our non-financial risk and control environment, and deal

with the consequences—including fines and other legal

fees—related to any adverse findings.

In addition, regulators in Australia and New Zealand

have a number of reviews underway, in many areas

including home loan pricing, remuneration, and capital/

risk weighted asset methodologies across the sector.

Further clarity on these reviews is expected in the year

ahead.

Conclusion

I want to conclude by thanking shareholders, on behalf

of the management team and all of our employees, for

your continued support this year. We recognise that

reputational issues, regulatory and legal issues, and

financial performance challenges have made this a

difficult year to be an investor in Westpac.

The year ahead will continue to be challenging, from

multiple perspectives—economic, competitive, legal,

reputational, and regulatory. I hope that my letter has

provided some useful context as to the nature of these

challenges and the clear-eyed way in which we are

responding to this environment. We recognise where

we have fallen short, and are absolutely committed to

executing better and delivering on our strategy for the

future.

Through everything that has happened this year, I

remain very proud of this company, and its people.

We are well positioned, with many talented, dedicated

bankers who come to work every day genuinely

seeking to deliver world-class service and innovation for

customers.

I believe Westpac’s future is very bright and 2019

will prove to be a watershed for us in confronting

the realities of a changed banking environment

and responding decisively in ways that set us up to

outperform in the future.

Once again, thank you for your continued support and

faith in the Westpac Group.



Brian Hartzer

Chief Executive Officer The Westpac Group

3. Performance discipline:

• Deliver $500 million in annual productivity

savings in FY20 (23% above FY19)

• Further reshape the network

• Improve controls and risk management

capabilities to ensure Westpac is resilient for

the future, including further implementation of

the Royal Commission and CGA self-assessment

recommendation

We will report progress against each of these goals in

our regular market updates.

6. What is the outlook for 2020?

The economic outlook for Australia remains challenging,

in part reflecting a softer global environment.

Annualised growth in the June quarter of 2019 was only

1.4%, which is lower than population growth of 1.6%. The

dynamics of global trade, weak real wages growth, a

softer housing market, low interest rates and subdued

economic activity have all dampened consumer

confidence.

That said, overall GDP growth remains positive and the

economy continues to benefit from a strong resources

sector, a lower Australian dollar, large infrastructure

investments, and targeted income tax cuts. A slowdown

in residential construction over the last year, combined

with lower interest rates, should see a continued

recovery in house prices building on the momentum

we have seen in the September quarter, particularly

in Sydney and Melbourne. However GDP growth is

likely to remain below longer-term averages (which is ~

2.75%) at 2.3% for calendar 2019 and 2.4% for calendar

2020.

With consumer and business confidence relatively

weak, credit growth has been slow. Overall credit

growth for the Australian financial system slowed to

2.7% in the year to September 2019, down from 4.5%

a year ago. That included a decline in housing credit

growth from 5.4% to 3.1%; business from 3.8% to 3.3%

and personal credit contracting by 4.4% after declining

by 1% a year earlier.

We expect credit growth to lift slightly in 2020 to 3%

overall, with housing credit growth increasing to 3.5%.

Business credit growth is also expected to grow by

around 3%, while other personal credit is expected to

contract by around 2%.

Interest rates are expected to remain very low. The RBA

reduced the cash rate from 1.5% to 0.75% over the year,

and we expect a further rate cut to 0.5% in early 2020.

With rates at this level, there are limited options for the

RBA to cut further if the economy turns down; however

the Commonwealth Budget is set to return to surplus in

2019/20 and the Commonwealth government has the

scope for additional stimulus if required.

Economic conditions in New Zealand have also

softened, with sluggish consumer spending and weak

business confidence. We expect a small improvement

in 2020 supported by lower interest rates; some fiscal

stimulus; and the competitive (lower) New Zealand

dollar.

142019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Information on Westpac

Westpac is one of the four major banking organisations

in Australia and one of the largest banking organisations

in New Zealand. We provide a broad range of banking

and financial services in these markets, including

consumer

1

, business and institutional banking and

wealth management services.

We have branches, affiliates and controlled entities

2


throughout Australia, New Zealand, Asia and in the

Pacific region, and maintain branches and offices in

some of the key financial centres around the world.

3


We were founded in 1817 and were the first bank

established in Australia. In 1850, we were incorporated

as the Bank of New South Wales by an Act of the New

South Wales Parliament. In 1982, we changed our name

to Westpac Banking Corporation following our merger

with the Commercial Bank of Australia. On 23 August

2002, we were registered as a public company limited

by shares under the Australian Corporations Act 2001

(Cth) (Corporations Act).

At 30 September 2019, our market capitalisation was

$103 billion

4

and we had total assets of $907 billion.

Organisational structure

Our business is focused in Australia and New Zealand,

operating under multiple brands. The Group operates

through an extensive branch and ATM network,

significant online capability, and call centres supported

by specialist relationship and product managers. Our

operations comprise the following key divisions:

Consumer is responsible for sales and service to

consumer customers in Australia. Consumer is also

responsible for the Group’s insurance business which

covers the manufacture and distribution of life, general

and lenders mortgage insurances. The division also uses

a third party to manufacture certain general insurance

products. Banking products are provided under the

Westpac, St.George, BankSA, Bank of Melbourne, and

RAMS brands, while insurance products are provided

under Westpac and BT brands. Consumer works with

Business and WIB in the sales, service, and referral

of certain financial services and products including

superannuation, platforms, auto lending and foreign

exchange. The revenue from these products is mostly

retained by the product originators.

Business provides business banking and wealth facilities

and products for customers across Australia. Business is

responsible for manufacturing and distributing facilities

to SME and Commercial business customers (including

Agribusiness) generally for up to $150 million in

exposure. SME customers include relationship managed

and non-relationship managed SME customers

(generally between $100k-$250k facilities). The division

offers a wide range of banking products and services

to support their borrowing, payments and transaction

needs. In addition, specialist services are provided

for cash flow finance, trade finance, automotive and

equipment finance and property finance. The division is

also responsible for Private Wealth and the manufacture

and distribution of investments (including margin

lending and equities broking), superannuation and

retirement products as well as wealth administration

platforms. Business operates under the Westpac,

St.George, BankSA, Bank of Melbourne, and BT brands.

Business works with Consumer and WIB in the sale,

referral and service of select financial services and

risk management products (including corporate

superannuation, foreign exchange and interest rate

hedging). The revenue from these products is mostly

retained by the product originators.

Westpac Institutional Bank (WIB) delivers a broad

range of financial products and services to commercial,

corporate, institutional and government customers

operating in, or with connections to Australia and New

Zealand. WIB operates through dedicated industry

relationship and specialist product teams, with expert

knowledge in transactional banking, and financial

and debt capital markets. Customers are supported

throughout Australia and via branches and subsidiaries

located in New Zealand, the US, UK and Asia. WIB is

also responsible for Westpac Pacific providing a full

range of banking services in Fiji and PNG. WIB works

with all the Group’s divisions in the provision of markets

related financial needs including foreign exchange and

fixed interest solutions.

Westpac New Zealand is responsible for sales and

service of banking, wealth and insurance products for

consumer, business and institutional customers in New

Zealand. Westpac conducts its New Zealand banking

business through two banks: Westpac New Zealand

Limited, which is incorporated in New Zealand and

Westpac Banking Corporation (New Zealand Branch),

which is incorporated in Australia. Westpac New

Zealand operates via an extensive network of branches

and ATMs across both the North and South Islands.

Business and institutional customers are also served

through relationship and specialist product teams.

Banking products are provided under the Westpac

brand while insurance and wealth products are provided

under Westpac Life and BT brands, respectively. New

Zealand also maintains its own infrastructure, including

technology, operations and treasury.

Group Businesses include:

• Treasury, which is responsible for the management

of the Group’s balance sheet including wholesale

funding, capital and the management of liquidity.

Treasury also manages the interest rate risk and

foreign exchange risks inherent in the balance sheet,

including managing the mismatch between Group

assets and liabilities. Treasury’s earnings are primarily

sourced from managing the Group’s balance sheet

and interest rate risk, (excluding Westpac New

Zealand) within set risk limits;

• Group Technology, which is responsible for

technology strategy and architecture, infrastructure

and operations, applications development and

business integration in Australia;

• Core Support, which comprises functions performed

centrally, including Australian banking operations,

property services, strategy, finance, risk, compliance,

legal, human resources, and customer and corporate

relations; and

1. A consumer is defined as a person who uses our products and

services. It does not include business entities.

2. Refer to Note 31 to the financial statements for a list of our

material controlled entities as at 30 September 2019.

3. Contact details for our head office, major businesses and

offshore locations can be found on the inside back cover.

4. Based on the closing share price of our ordinary shares on the

ASX as at 30 September 2019.

Information on Westpac

15
2019 Westpac Group Annual Report

1

2

3

4

Information on Westpac

• Following the Group’s decision to restructure its

wealth operations and exit its Advice business

in March 2019, the residual Advice operations

(including associated remediation) and certain

support functions of BTFG Australia have been

transferred to Group Businesses.

Group Technology costs are fully allocated to other

divisions in the Group. Core Support costs are

partially allocated to other divisions, while Group

Head Office costs are retained in Group Businesses.

Group Businesses also includes earnings on capital not

allocated to divisions, certain intra-group transactions

that facilitate the presentation of the performance of

the Group’s divisions, gains/losses from most asset

sales, earnings and costs associated with the Group’s

Fintech investments, and certain other head office items

such as centrally raised provisions.

Significant developments

Westpac significant developments

Customer remediation

Through the Group’s ‘get it right, put it right’ initiative

we have continued to review products, processes

and policies to identify where we may not have got it

right for our customers. Where problems have been

identified, the Group has committed to fix them and

refund customers. These initiatives identified a number

of issues that require ongoing remediation.

The Group has undertaken steps designed to accelerate

the processing of customer refunds and centralise

oversight of certain remediation under the Chief

Operating Officer.

Further information in relation to compliance, reputation

and remediation provisions is included in Note 27 to the

financial statements.

Changes to wealth strategy

During the course of the year, Westpac reset its wealth

strategy and made a number of changes to its wealth

business. This resulted in the realignment of our major

BT Financial Group businesses into the Consumer and

Business divisions from 1 April 2019.

During the financial year ended 30 September 2019,

Westpac also completed the exit of its personal

financial advice business, which included completing a

sale with Viridian Advisory on 1 July 2019 and moving to

a referral model for financial advisers utilising a panel of

adviser firms.

First strike against remuneration report

On 12 December 2018 at Westpac’s Annual General

Meeting of shareholders, Westpac incurred a first strike

against its remuneration report. A strike occurs where a

company’s remuneration report receives a ‘no’ vote of

25% or more. If Westpac receives a second strike at its

2019 Annual General Meeting, a spill resolution will be

put to shareholders. If 50% or more of votes cast are in

favour of that spill resolution, a spill meeting is required

to be held within 90 days. At that spill meeting, certain

directors will be required to stand for re-election.

In response to the first strike and other feedback

received Westpac has made changes to both the

structure of remuneration and outcomes. Further detail

is included in the Remuneration Report included in the

Directors’ Report.

Financial crime

In an environment of ongoing legislative reform,

regulatory change and increased industry focus,

Westpac continues to progress a program of work

to improve its management of financial crime risks

(including Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-

Terrorism Financing (AML/CTF), sanctions, Anti-Bribery

and Corruption, FATCA and Common Reporting

Standards). This work includes a review of our AML/

CTF policies, the completeness of data feeding into

our AML/CTF systems and our AML/CTF processes

and controls. Westpac has been regularly updating

AUSTRAC on progress and continues to implement

a number of improvements to its AML/CTF Program,

governance, policies, systems and controls together

with related remediation work in respect of certain

controls and reporting practices. These efforts relate to

matters such as customer on-boarding, customer and

payment screening; ongoing customer due diligence,

transaction monitoring and regulatory reporting

(including in relation to International Funds Transfer

Instructions (IFTIs), Suspicious Matter Reports and

Threshold Transaction Reports).

As reported in the Group’s 2018 Annual Report, the

Group self-reported to AUSTRAC a failure to report

a large number of IFTIs (as required under Australia’s

AML/CTF Act). Under the Act, the ‘sender’ financial

institution of an IFTI transmitted out of Australia, or the

‘recipient’ financial institution of an IFTI transmitted into

Australia, is required to report the IFTI to AUSTRAC

within 10 business days of the instruction being sent

or received. The majority of the IFTIs which are the

subject of the Group’s engagement with AUSTRAC,

concern batch instructions received by Westpac

through one WIB product between 2009 and 2018 from

a small number of correspondent banks for payments

made predominantly to beneficiaries living in Australia

in Australian dollars, on behalf of clients of those

correspondent banks. The majority of the payments

were low value, recurring and made by foreign

government pension funds and corporates.

AUSTRAC has issued a number of detailed statutory

notices over the last year requiring information relating

to the Group’s processes, procedures and oversight.

These notices relate to a range of matters including

these IFTI reporting failures and associated potential

failings related to record keeping and obligations

to obtain and pass on certain data in funds transfer

instructions, as well as correspondent banking due

diligence, risk assessments and transaction monitoring.

Westpac has not yet received an indication from

AUSTRAC about the nature of any enforcement action

it may take. The Group is continuing to work with

AUSTRAC in relation to these matters.

Any enforcement action against Westpac may include

civil penalty proceedings and result in the payment of a

significant financial penalty, which Westpac is currently

unable to reliably estimate. Previous enforcement action

by AUSTRAC against other institutions has resulted

in a range of outcomes, depending on the nature and

severity of the relevant conduct and its consequences.

Further information about these matters is set out in

Note 27 to the financial statements. Details about the

consequences of failing to comply with financial crime

obligations is set out in ‘Risk Factors’ in section 2.

162019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Information on Westpac

Regulatory and Government focus

Royal Commission into the banking, superannuation

and financial services industries

On 14 December 2017, the Australian Government

established a Royal Commission into potential

misconduct in Australia’s banks and other financial

services entities. The Royal Commission’s Final Report

was released on 4 February 2019 and contained 76

express recommendations. In light of Westpac’s wealth

strategy reset and the Government’s signalled approach

to implementation, 49 of those recommendations

presently apply to Westpac. Of these 49

recommendations, 11 recommendations have now been

implemented, with Westpac either establishing new

practices and procedures to meet the recommendations

or having existing practices consistent with the

recommendation, and a further 11 recommendations are

in the process of being implemented. Some of these

recommendations will require legislative or regulatory

action before implementation can be completed.

The remaining 27 recommendations require legislative

or regulatory action before implementation work can

commence. Westpac is undertaking preparatory work

where possible, including through participation in

Government consultation.

The recommendations are broadly aimed at

protecting consumers against misconduct, providing

adequate redress and addressing asymmetries of

power and information between financial services

entities and their customers. Implementation of the

recommendations is likely to continue to have a

significant impact on banking and financial services

entities and their regulators. Some of the most

significant recommendations include those concerning

the regulation of mortgage brokers, the prohibition

of unsolicited sales of insurance and superannuation

products and removal of grandfathered commissions.

The Government has stated that it will take action on

all of the recommendations contained within the Final

Report. On 19 August 2019, the Government released its

Royal Commission implementation roadmap which sets

out a timeline for consultation and the introduction of

legislation which will implement the recommendations.

The implementation roadmap foreshadows that a large

number of legislative changes will be enacted into law

or introduced before Parliament by mid-2020.

Other impacts arising from the Royal Commission

include a number of claims being brought against

financial institutions in relation to certain matters

considered during the Royal Commission, and the

referral of several cases of misconduct to the financial

regulators by Commissioner Hayne.

APRA self-assessment

On 29 November 2018, Westpac submitted to APRA

its self-assessment on its frameworks and practices in

relation to governance, culture and accountability. A

copy of Westpac’s self-assessment is available on our

website.

On 22 May 2019, APRA released a report analysing

self-assessments carried out by 36 banks, insurers

and superannuation licensees. APRA noted a wide

variation in the quality of the self-assessments, however

consistent findings in the self-assessments included:

• non-financial risk management requires

improvement;

• accountabilities are not always clear, cascaded and

effectively enforced;

• acknowledged weaknesses are well-known and

some have been long-standing; and

• risk culture is not well understood, and therefore

may not be reinforcing the desired behaviours.

Westpac has a program of work underway to

address the recommendations identified in the

self-assessment report which has oversight of the

Westpac Board. Westpac has implemented 40% of the

recommendations identified in the self-assessment and

expects to complete its program of work by March 2021.

Regulatory reviews and inquiries

Provision of credit - reviews by and engagement

with regulators

The provision and availability of credit for residential

mortgage holders, property investors and businesses

has continued to be a key area of Government, regulator

and industry focus throughout the financial year ended

30 September 2019. Regulatory focus on credit from

APRA has primarily been related to serviceability at

an industry level, while ASIC has continued to consult

on proposed changes to its regulatory guide on

responsible lending. Judicial guidance on the extent of

responsible lending obligations was also obtained from

the Federal Court in its judgment in ASIC’s responsible

lending test case against Westpac (with the judgment

currently under appeal). More information on these

proceedings is set out in this section below.

APRA has also been engaging with Westpac on the

adequacy of our credit risk management framework

including our controls, policies and operating systems.

Following feedback from APRA, the Group is making

a number of changes to its systems and controls to

improve its end-to-end approach in relation to its

mortgage and business lending portfolios, as well as

other key processes. This includes enhancing portfolio

management practices, systems upgrades (including

data collection and rationalisation), strengthening

collateral management processes and improving

assurance and oversight over our credit management

frameworks. This program of work also addresses issues

identified by Westpac’s internal assurance and audit

teams.

Westpac will continue its work to improve its end to end

credit processes and expects engagement with APRA in

this regard to continue throughout Full Year 2020.

17
2019 Westpac Group Annual Report

1

2

3

4

Information on Westpac

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission

(ACCC) inquiry into home loan pricing

On 14 October 2019, the ACCC was directed by the

Treasurer of Australia to conduct an inquiry into home

loan pricing since 1 January 2019. The inquiry has been

established to:

• investigate the prices charged for home loans across

the sector;

• consider how banks make pricing decisions,

including their approach to passing on movements

in the official cash rate;

• examine differences in the prices paid by new and

existing customers;

• examine differences between the interest rates

published by suppliers and the interest rates paid by

customers; and

• investigate barriers that may prevent consumers

from switching lenders.

An interim report is due by 30 March 2020 and a final

report is due by 30 September 2020.

ACCC residential mortgage products price inquiry

in relation to the Bank Levy

The ACCC undertook a specific inquiry into the pricing

of residential mortgages by those banks affected by

the Bank Levy (including Westpac), which included

monitoring the extent to which the Bank Levy was

passed on to customers. The final report was published

in December 2018 and made a number of findings

about the pricing or residential mortgages, including

that the banks that were the subject of the inquiry did

not change residential mortgage prices specifically to

recover the costs of the Bank Levy.

AFCA look back review

On 4 February 2019, the Australian Government

announced that, in response to the recommendations

contained in the Royal Commission’s Final Report, it

would expand the remit of the Australian Financial

Complaints Authority (AFCA) for 12 months so that it

can consider customer claims dating back to 1 January

2008 and award compensation where appropriate.

AFCA has expanded its jurisdiction to consider these

legacy complaints for an additional 12 month period to

30 June 2020.

Increased regulatory powers and oversight

Australian Securities and Investments Commission

(ASIC) Enforcement Review Taskforce

On 16 April 2018, the Australian Government agreed to

implement all of the recommendations made by the

ASIC Enforcement Review Taskforce in its review of the

suitability of ASIC’s existing regulatory tools.

Progress continues to be made in implementing these

recommendations, including:

• the Australian Treasury releasing five draft Bills on 11

September 2019 for consultation which, if enacted,

would further strengthen ASIC’s enforcement

and supervision powers by implementing certain

recommendations relating to search warrants,

access to telecommunications interception

information, licensing and banning orders; and

• the Taskforce releasing a report on 2 October 2019.

The report sets out ASIC’s observations on director

and officer oversight of non-financial risk, how

directors and officers of large and complex financial

services companies are discharging their duties in

relation to oversight and monitoring of non-financial

risk, and ways that governance practices could be

improved.

Enhanced penalties for corporate and financial

sector misconduct

On 12 March 2019, the Treasury Laws Amendment

(Strengthening Corporate and Financial Sector

Penalties) Act 2019 (Cth) received royal assent. The Act

strengthens penalties for corporate and financial sector

misconduct consistent with the ASIC Enforcement

Review Taskforce recommendations.

Key aspects of the Act are to:

• update the penalties for certain criminal offences

in legislation administered by ASIC, including

tripling the maximum imprisonment penalties

for certain criminal offences (from 5 to 15 years),

introducing a formula to calculate financial penalties

for contraventions of civil penalty provisions

by individuals and companies, and removing

imprisonment as a penalty but increasing the

financial penalties for all strict and absolute liability

offences;

• introduce ordinary criminal offences that sit

alongside strict and absolute liability offences;

• expand the civil penalty regime by making a wider

range of offences subject to civil penalties, such as

failures by Australian financial services licensees

to act efficiently, fairly and honestly, and failures

to report significant breaches within 10 days of

becoming aware of the breach or of circumstances

where they are likely to breach;

• introduce a new test that applies to all dishonesty

offences under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth); and

• ensure the Courts prioritise compensating victims

over ordering the payment of financial penalties.

ASIC’s close and continuous monitoring program

ASIC has continued to use a supervisory approach in

which ASIC officers are embedded in major financial

institutions, including Westpac, in order to actively

limit future financial harm to consumers, investors and

markets and to catalyse positive, consumer oriented,

behavioural change.

To date, the model adopted by ASIC is for officers

to make extended onsite visits to major financial

institutions. ASIC’s program is examining culture and

processes in major financial institutions through three

streams: Breach Reporting, Corporate Governance

and Internal Dispute Resolution (IDR). ASIC’s onsite

on Breach Reporting and engagement on Corporate

Governance is now complete. The IDR onsite for

Westpac commenced on 15 October 2019.

182019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Information on Westpac

care with vulnerable customers and train staff to help,

simplified loan contracts for small business written

in plain English, better protection for guarantors and

stronger enforcement of the Code.

The Code will be further updated with key amendments

in response to the recommendations contained in the

Royal Commission’s Final Report, which recommended

changes in relation to the protection of small businesses

and having a greater focus on customers in remote

areas and those with limited English. These changes

include banning informal overdrafts on basic accounts

without prior express agreement with the customer,

abolishing dishonour fees on basic bank accounts and

following AUSTRAC’s guidance on the identification

and verification of persons of Aboriginal or Torres Strait

Islander heritage. Subject to regulatory approvals, it

is expected that these updates will be effective from

1 March 2020.

Open banking regime

The Treasury Laws Amendment (Consumer Data Right)

Act 2019 (Cth) (CDR Act) received royal assent on 12

August 2019. The CDR Act amends the Competition and

Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth)

and the Australian Information Commissioner Act 2010

(Cth) to introduce a consumer data right. The banking

sector is the first sector to which the consumer data

right will apply.

The introduction of a consumer data right in the

Australian economy signifies a shift in how data is

regulated. It will give customers in Australia a right

to direct that their data (starting with banking data)

be shared with accredited third parties and follows

a growing global trend to give consumers control

over their data. Data sharing is expected to facilitate

competition through easier product comparison and

switching. This will have significant implications for

consumers and banks.

On 2 September 2019, the ACCC released the final

Competition and Consumer (Consumer Data Right)

Rules 2019 (CDR Rules). The CDR Rules outline how

the consumer data right is to be implemented in the

banking sector. A revised timetable for the introduction

of open banking was included as part of the CDR Rules.

Both the CDR Act and CDR Rules contain new, detailed

privacy protections under 13 Privacy Safeguards. The

Privacy Safeguards deal with the disclosure, collection,

use, accuracy, storage, security and deletion of

consumer data right data. There are also 58 civil penalty

provisions under the CDR Rules. A breach of the

Privacy Safeguards or the CDR Rules could attract civil

penalties of up to the greater of $10 million, 3 times any

benefit obtained or 10% of 12 month annual turnover for

corporations.

Comprehensive Credit Reporting (CCR)

On 15 August 2019, an updated version of the National

Consumer Credit Protection Amendment (Mandatory

Comprehensive Credit Reporting) Bill 2018 (Cth) was

released for consultation by the Australian Treasury,

following the prior introduction of the Bill into the

House of Representatives in March 2018. It is expected

that this updated Bill will be introduced into Parliament

in late 2019.

Product design and distribution obligations and

product intervention power

On 5 April 2019, the Treasury Laws Amendment (Design

and Distribution Obligations and Product Intervention

Powers) Act 2019 (Cth) received royal assent. The

Act amends the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) and the

National Consumer Credit Protection Act 2009 (Cth)

and grants ASIC a product intervention power and

introduces a new ‘principles-based’ product design and

distribution obligation on issuers and distributors.

Regulatory enforcement approach

On 15 April 2019, APRA released its Enforcement

Approach with immediate effect. The new Enforcement

Approach follows the results of its Enforcement Review,

released on the same day. The Enforcement Review

made seven recommendations which were designed to

help APRA better leverage its enforcement powers to

achieve prudential outcomes.

In response to the Enforcement Review, APRA stated

it would implement all recommendations including

increasing APRA’s enforcement appetite from a ‘last

resort’ to a ‘constructively tough’ approach. The new

enforcement approach sets out how APRA will use its

enforcement powers to prevent and address serious

prudential risks, and to hold entities and individuals to

account. APRA’s approach states that it may do this

well before the risks (whether financial, operational or

behavioural) present an immediate threat to financial

viability. Further, where entities or individuals are failing

to meet prudential obligations, APRA will act quickly

and forcefully, and will be willing to set public examples

to deter unacceptable practices from occurring in the

future.

On 26 February 2019, the ACCC outlined its compliance

and enforcement priorities in its annual Compliance and

Enforcement Policy refresh. The ACCC’s competition

enforcement approach and objectives are supported

by increased budget support from the Government

announced at the end of 2018.

In October 2018, ASIC committed to accelerating

enforcement activities, conducting more civil and

criminal enforcement actions against large financial

institutions and adopting a ‘why not litigate?’

enforcement stance. Following the release of the Royal

Commission’s Final Report, ASIC has established a

separate Office of Enforcement within ASIC.

Review into corporate criminal responsibility

regime

On 10 April 2019, the Australian Government

commissioned the Australian Law Reform Commission

(ALRC) to undertake a comprehensive review of the

corporate criminal responsibility regime. The review

is to consider reforms to the Criminal Code and other

relevant legislation to provide a simpler, stronger

and more cohesive regime for corporate criminal

responsibility. The ALRC’s report is to be provided to

the Australian Government by 30 April 2020.

General regulatory changes affecting our business

Banking Code of Practice

On 31 July 2018, ASIC approved the Banking Code of

Practice (the Code) with an implementation date of

1 July 2019 for each bank that has adopted the Code

(including Westpac). The Code introduces a range of

new measures including a commitment to take extra

19
2019 Westpac Group Annual Report

1

2

3

4

Information on Westpac

Litigation

ASIC’s responsible lending litigation against

Westpac

On 1 March 2017, ASIC commenced Federal Court

proceedings against Westpac in relation to certain

home loans entered into between December 2011 and

March 2015, which were automatically approved by

Westpac’s systems as part of its broader processes.

The proceedings were heard in May 2019. On 13

August 2019, the Court handed down its judgment

in the proceedings, and dismissed ASIC’s case. On 10

September 2019 ASIC filed an appeal in relation to the

decision.

Outbound scaled advice division proceedings

On 22 December 2016, ASIC commenced Federal Court

proceedings against BT Funds Management Limited

(BTFM) and Westpac Securities Administration Limited

(WSAL) in relation to a number of superannuation

account consolidation campaigns conducted between

2013 and 2016. ASIC has alleged that in the course of

some of these campaigns, customers were provided

with personal advice in contravention of a number of

Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) provisions, and selected

15 specific customers as the focus of their claim. In

December 2018 the primary Court handed down a

judgment in which it held that no personal advice

had been provided and that BTFM and WSAL did not

contravene the relevant personal advice provisions

although it did make a finding that BTFM and WSAL

had each contravened section 912A(1)(a) of the

Corporations Act. In February 2019, ASIC filed an appeal

against this decision. On 28 October 2019, the Full

Federal Court handed down its decision in ASIC’s favour

and made findings that BTFM and WSAL each provided

personal advice on the relevant calls. Once formal

declarations of contravention are made, the matter will

be remitted for penalty.

ASIC’s proceedings against Westpac for poor

financial advice by a financial planner

On 14 June 2018, ASIC commenced proceedings in the

Federal Court against Westpac in relation to alleged

poor financial advice provided by a former financial

planner, Mr Sudhir Sinha. Mr Sinha was dismissed by

Westpac in November 2014 and subsequently banned

by ASIC. Westpac has proactively initiated remediation

to identify and compensate affected customers and has

completed remediation activities. ASIC’s proceedings

relate to advice provided by Mr Sinha in respect of four

specific customer files. The matter was heard by the

Court on 15 April 2019 and judgment has been reserved.

Class action against Westpac Banking Corporation

and Westpac Life Insurance Services Limited

On 12 October 2017, a class action was filed in the

Federal Court of Australia on behalf of customers

who, since February 2011, obtained insurance issued

by Westpac Life Insurance Services Limited (WLIS) on

the recommendation of financial advisers employed

within the Westpac Group. The plaintiffs have alleged

that aspects of the financial advice provided by those

advisers breached fiduciary and statutory duties

owed to the advisers’ clients, including the duty to

act in the best interests of the client, and that WLIS

was knowingly involved in those alleged breaches.

Westpac and WLIS are defending the proceedings.

These proceedings are currently stayed by order of the

Court, pending the outcome of an appeal concerning

a procedural issue unrelated to the substantive claims

made in the class action.

BBSW proceedings

Following ASIC’s investigations into the interbank

short-term money market and its impact on the setting

of the bank bill swap reference rate (BBSW), on 5

April 2016, ASIC commenced civil proceedings against

Westpac in the Federal Court of Australia, alleging

certain misconduct, including market manipulation

and unconscionable conduct. On 24 May 2018, Justice

Beach found that Westpac had not engaged in market

manipulation or misleading or deceptive conduct under

the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth). His Honour also found

that there was no ‘trading practice’ of manipulating the

BBSW rate. However, the Court found that Westpac

engaged in unconscionable conduct on 4 occasions

and that Westpac breached certain of its duties as a

financial services licensee. On 9 November 2018, the

Court ordered Westpac to pay a penalty of $3.3 million

and 50% of ASIC’s costs, and have an independent

expert review particular aspects of Westpac’s

compliance arrangements. Westpac has complied with

these orders. The amount of costs recoverable by ASIC

is still in the process of being determined.

In August 2016, a class action was filed in the United

States District Court for the Southern District of New

York against Westpac and large number of Australian

and international banks alleging misconduct in relation

to the bank bill swap reference rate. In April 2019, an

amended claim was filed by the Plaintiffs. Westpac is

defending the proceedings with a Motion to Dismiss

filed in May 2019.

Responsible lending class action

On 21 February 2019, a class action against Westpac

was filed in the Federal Court of Australia. As directed

by the Court, the Plaintiffs filed a Statement of Claim

on 22 May 2019 and an amended statement of claim

on 18 October 2019. The claims allege that Westpac

did not comply with its responsible lending obligations

and entered into certain home loans that it should

otherwise have assessed as unsuitable. The allegations

include that, during the period from 1 January 2011

to 17 February 2018, Westpac failed to: conduct

reasonable inquiries about the customers’ financial

situation, requirements and objectives; verify customer’s

financial situation; conduct assessments of suitability;

and act efficiently and fairly. Westpac is defending the

proceedings.

Cash in super class action

On 5 September 2019, a class action against BT Funds

Management Limited (BTFM) and Westpac Life

Insurance Services Limited (WLIS) was commenced

in relation to aspects of BTFM’s BT Super for Life cash

investment option. The claim follows other industry

class actions as part of Slater and Gordon’s ‘Get your

super back’ campaign.

It is alleged in the proceedings that BTFM failed to

adhere to a number of obligations under the general

law, the relevant trust deed and the Superannuation

Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (Cth), and that WLIS

was knowingly concerned with BTFM’s alleged

contraventions. The damages sought by the claim

are unspecified. BTFM and WLIS are defending the

proceedings.

202019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Information on Westpac

Information on Westpac

Regulatory capital transactions

Capital raising

On 4 November 2019, Westpac announced that it will

be undertaking an underwritten placement of fully paid

ordinary shares in Westpac to institutional investors

to raise $2 billion. As further announced, following the

placement, Westpac will make a share purchase plan

available to shareholders to raise approximately $500

million, subject to scaleback, and with the ability to raise

less or more.

Issue of Westpac Capital Notes 6

On 18 December 2018, Westpac issued approximately

$1.42 billion of securities known as Westpac Capital

Notes 6 which qualify as Additional Tier 1 capital under

APRA’s capital adequacy framework.

Transfer and redemption of Westpac Capital Notes

On 18 December 2018, approximately $722 million

of Westpac Capital Notes were transferred to the

Westpac Capital Notes nominated party for $100 each

pursuant to the Westpac Capital Notes 6 reinvestment

offer. Those Westpac Capital Notes were subsequently

redeemed by Westpac.

On 8 March 2019, being the optional redemption/

transfer date of the Westpac Capital Notes, the

remaining $662 million of Westpac Capital Notes were

transferred to the Westpac Capital Notes nominated

party for $100 each. Those Westpac Capital Notes were

subsequently redeemed by Westpac.

Adoption of new accounting standards

Adoption of AASB 9 and AASB 15

The Group adopted the classification and measurement,

and impairment requirements of AASB 9: Financial

Instruments (AASB 9) on 1 October 2018. AASB

9 includes a forward looking ‘expected credit

loss’ impairment model, revised classification and

measurement model and modifies the approach to

hedge accounting.

The adoption of AASB 9 reduced the Group’s retained

earnings at 1 October 2018 by $722 million (net of tax)

primarily due to the increase in impairment provisions

under the new standard.

The Group also adopted AASB 15: Revenue from

Contracts with Customers (AASB 15) on 1 October 2018.

AASB 15 provides a systematic approach to revenue

recognition by introducing a five-step model governing

revenue measurement and recognition. The adoption

of AASB 15 reduced the Group’s retained earnings at

1 October 2018 by $5 million (net of tax).

Further details of the changes from the adoption of

AASB 9 and AASB 15 as well as details of accounting

standards that have been issued but are not yet

effective for the Group are included in Note 1 to the

financial statements.

Transition to AASB 16

AASB 16: Leases (AASB 16) replaced AASB 117: Leases

from 1 October 2019. AASB 16 requires all leases of

greater than 12 months duration to be presented on

balance sheet by the lessee as a right-of-use asset and

a lease liability. The application of AASB 16 is expected

to result in the recognition of a right-of-use asset of

$3.4 billion with a corresponding lease liability, with no

impact on retained earnings.

Further details of the changes under the new standard

are included in Note 1 to the financial statements.

APRA regulatory changes

APRA’s proposed changes to capital standards

On 19 July 2017, APRA released an Information Paper

titled ‘Strengthening Banking System Resilience -

Establishing Unquestionably Strong Capital Ratios’.

In its release, APRA concluded that the four major

Australian banks, including Westpac, need to have

a common equity tier 1 (CET1) capital ratio of at

least 10.5%, as measured under the existing capital

framework, to be considered ‘unquestionably strong’.

Banks are expected to meet this new benchmark by 1

January 2020.

APRA has commenced consultation on revisions to

the capital framework which includes proposals on

changes to risk weighted assets, including in relation

to residential mortgages as well as improving the

transparency, comparability and flexibility of the

framework.

As part of the proposals, APRA has proposed a

minimum Leverage Ratio requirement of 3.5% for ADIs,

such as Westpac, that use the internal ratings-based

approach to determine capital adequacy.

APRA has indicated that it expects to finalise the

suite of prudential standards to give effect to the

‘unquestionably strong’ benchmark in 2020-21, with

the revised prudential standards likely to come into

effect from 1 January 2022. In regards to the proposed

revisions to the capital treatment of operational risk,

APRA has proposed an earlier implementation date

of 1 January 2021 for advanced IRB banks, such as

Westpac.

APRA has announced that its revisions to the capital

framework are not intended to necessitate further

capital increases for the industry above the 10.5%

benchmark. However, given the proposals include higher

risk weights for certain mortgage products, such as

interest only loans and loans for investment purposes,

the impact on individual banks may vary. The proposals

are currently under consultation and final details remain

unclear, and it is therefore too soon to determine the

impact on Westpac.

Further details of Westpac’s other regulatory

disclosures required in accordance with prudential

standard APS 330 can be accessed at

https://www.westpac.com.au/about-westpac/investor-

centre/financial-information/regulatory-disclosures/.

APRA’s additional capital requirements

On 11 July 2019, Westpac received APRA’s response

to its self-assessment. In its response, APRA decided

to apply an additional $500 million to Westpac’s

operational risk capital requirement. This follows APRA

concluding that Westpac was required to improve its

management and oversight of non-financial risk. The

additional capital requirement will remain in place until

APRA is satisfied that Westpac has completed its action

plan.

The $500 million requirement, applied through an

increase in risk weighted assets, took effect from 30

September 2019. The change reduced Westpac’s Level

2 CET1 capital ratio by 16 basis points. Westpac’s CET1

capital ratio at 30 September 2019 was 10.67%.

21
2019 Westpac Group Annual Report

1

2

3

4

Information on Westpac

APRA’s proposed revisions to subsidiary capital

investment treatment

On 15 October 2019, APRA released a discussion paper

on proposed changes to APS 111 Capital Adequacy:

Measurement of Capital. The key proposal is in relation

to a parent ADI’s treatment of its equity investments in

banking and insurance subsidiaries (Level 1). Westpac’s

largest investment in banking and insurance subsidiaries

is Westpac New Zealand Limited (WNZL). There is no

impact from this proposal on the calculation of the

Group’s reported regulatory capital ratios on a Level 2

basis. On a Level 1 basis, on a proforma basis as at 30

September 2019, it is estimated that applying APRA’s

proposed approach would reduce Westpac’s Level 1

CET1 ratio by approximately 40bps ($1.6 billion). APRA

has indicated that the updated standard will come into

effect from 1 January 2021.

Associations with Related Entities

On 20 August 2019, APRA released the finalised

prudential standard APS 222: Associations with Related

Entities. The revised standard is intended to strengthen

the ability of ADIs to monitor, limit and control risks

arising from transactions and other associations with

related entities. Key changes include revisions to the

limit for exposure to ADIs from 50% of Total Capital to

25% of Tier 1 capital. The revised standard is effective

from 1 January 2021.

Westpac’s largest exposure to a related entity is WNZL.

As at 30 September 2019, Westpac would remain within

the revised limits based on the current level of exposure

to WNZL.

Additional loss absorbing capacity

In response to the Financial System Inquiry

recommendations, the Australian Government agreed

to further reforms regarding crisis management and

establishing a framework for minimum loss-absorbing

and recapitalisation capacity.

On 9 July 2019, APRA announced a requirement for the

Australian major banks (including Westpac) to increase

their total capital requirements by three percentage

points of risk weighted assets (RWA) as measured

under the current capital adequacy framework. This

increase in total capital will take full effect from 1

January 2024.

Based on Westpac’s RWA of $429 billion at 30

September 2019, this represents around $13 billion

of additional capital over the four year transition

period. The additional capital is expected to be raised

through Tier 2 Capital and is likely to be offset by

a decrease in other forms of long term wholesale

funding. Westpac has commenced progress towards

the new requirements and in the financial year ended

30 September 2019 issued a total of $4.2 billion in Tier

2 capital.

APRA is still targeting an additional four to five

percentage points of loss-absorbing capacity. Over the

next four years, APRA will consider feasible alternative

methods for raising the remaining 1-2 percentage

points.

APRA intends to consult on a prudential framework

covering both recovery and resolution planning in 2020.

APRA’s proposed amendment to guidance on

mortgage lending

On 5 July 2019, APRA announced that it no longer

required ADIs to assess home loan applications using a

minimum interest rate of at least 7%. Instead, ADIs are

permitted to review and set their own minimum interest

rate floor for use in serviceability assessments and

utilise a revised interest rate buffer of at least 2.5% over

the loan’s interest rate. Also on 5 July 2019, APRA also

released its final version of Prudential Practice Guide

APG 223 – Residential Mortgage Lending.

APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234: Information

Security Management

On 1 July 2019, APRA’s Prudential Standard CPS 234:

Information Security came into effect, except for

information assets managed by a third party which will

come into effect from the earlier of the next contract

renewal date or 1 July 2020. The standard is aimed at

improving the ability of APRA-regulated entities to

detect cyber adversaries, ensure appropriate security

capabilities are in place commensurate to the risk of

the information assets including responding swiftly

and effectively in the event of an information security

incident. Westpac continues to enhance its systems and

processes to further mitigate cybersecurity risks.

APRA Prudential Standard CPS 511: Remuneration

On 23 July 2019, APRA released for consultation a new

draft prudential standard and supporting discussion

paper on remuneration. It is aimed at clarifying and

strengthening remuneration arrangements in APRA-

regulated entities. The new standard will replace

existing remuneration requirements under CPS/SPS 510

Governance with a proposed implementation date of

1 July 2021.

International developments affecting Westpac

Brexit

There continues to be uncertainty on the timing and

process for the United Kingdom’s (UK) withdrawal from

the European Union (EU).

As Westpac’s business and operations are based

predominantly in Australia and New Zealand, Westpac

expects that the direct impact of the UK’s departure

from the EU is unlikely to be material to Westpac.

However, it remains difficult to predict the impact

that Brexit may have on financial markets, the global

economy and the global financial services industry.

Westpac has contingency planning in place and has

been active in dialogue with affected customers.

OTC derivatives reform

International regulatory reforms relating to over-the-

counter (OTC) derivatives continue to be implemented

across the globe, with a current focus on initial margin

and risk mitigation practices for non-centrally cleared

derivatives.

As of 1 September 2019, Westpac is required to post

and collect collateral on a gross basis, held at third

party custodians. Global initial margin requirements will

continue to be introduced in phases until 1 September

2021.

222019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Information on Westpac

New Zealand

Reserve Bank of New Zealand (RBNZ) - Revised

Outsourcing Policy

As at 30 September 2019, WNZL is compliant with

the requirement in the RBNZ’s revised Outsourcing

Policy (BS11) (Revised Outsourcing Policy) to maintain

a compendium of outsourcing arrangements and work

is underway to comply with the other aspects of the

Revised Outsourcing Policy by 30 September 2022 in

line with the regulatory timeline.

As a result of complying with the Revised Outsourcing

Policy, the ongoing cost of operating the WNZL

business will increase, in addition to the costs of

implementing the changes.

RBNZ Capital Review

On 14 December 2018, the RBNZ released a consultation

paper to seek the public’s view on a proposal to set a

Tier 1 capital requirement equal to 16% of risk weighted

assets for banks deemed systemically important,

such as WNZL. The proposal of a Tier 1 ratio of 6%

of risk weighted assets as a regulatory minimum is

unchanged, and of this no more than 1.5% of risk

weighted assets can be contributed by Additional Tier

1 capital or redeemable preference shares. The RBNZ

has also proposed changes to risk weighted asset

measurements. The RBNZ has proposed a five year

transition period.

The proposed changes aim to further strengthen the

New Zealand banking system to protect the economy

and depositors from bank failure. WNZL would be

required to hold a further estimated NZ$2.3 – 2.9 billion

of Tier 1 capital (assuming a WNZL Tier 1 capital ratio of

16-17%) if the proposals were applied at 30 September

2019. WNZL is already strongly capitalised with a Tier 1

capital ratio of 13.9% at 30 September 2019.

On a pro-forma basis this change would also increase

Westpac’s Level 1 capital requirements by NZ$1.2-

$1.8 billion if the proposals were applied at 30

September 2019, assuming that some of WNZL’s

supplementary capital can be issued externally over

time and that APRA’s proposed revisions to subsidiary

capital investment treatment are implemented (more

information on these proposed revisions is set out

above). Further clarity on the proposals is expected

from the RBNZ in December 2019 with implementation

of any new rules starting from April 2020.

RBNZ - Review under section 95 of the Reserve

Bank of New Zealand Act 1989

In June 2019, in response to a review under section

95 of the Reserve Bank of New Zealand Act 1989 of

WNZL’s compliance with advanced internal rating based

aspects of the RBNZ’s ‘Capital Adequacy Framework

(Internal Models Based Approach)’ (BS2B), WNZL

presented the RBNZ with a submission providing an

overview of its credit risk rating system and activities

undertaken to address compliance issues and enhance

risk management practices.

On 30 October 2019, the RBNZ informed WNZL that it

had accepted the submission and measures undertaken

by WNZL to achieve satisfactory compliance with BS2B,

and that WNZL would retain its accreditation to use

internal models for credit risk in the calculation of its

regulatory capital requirements. It also advised WNZL

that, with effect from 31 December 2019, the RBNZ will

remove the requirement imposed on WNZL since 31

December 2017 to maintain minimum regulatory capital

ratios which are two percentage points higher than the

ratios applying to other locally incorporated banks.

Review of the Reserve Bank of New Zealand Act

In November 2017, the New Zealand Government

announced it would undertake a review of the Reserve

Bank of New Zealand Act 1989 (RBNZ Review). The

RBNZ Review will consist of two phases. The legislation

for the recommended Phase 1 related changes to New

Zealand’s monetary policy framework received royal

assent on 20 December 2018, and came into force on 1

April 2019.

The terms of reference for Phase 2 were released

in June 2018 and will consider the overarching

objectives of the RBNZ’s institutional governance and

decision-making, the macro-prudential framework, the

current prudential supervision model, trans-Tasman

coordination, supervision and enforcement and

resolution and crisis management. Final policy decisions

on all components of the review are expected to be

made in 2020.

RBNZ/Financial Markets Authority (FMA) -

Financial Services Conduct & Culture Review

In May 2018, the RBNZ and FMA commenced a review

in respect of New Zealand’s 10 major banks and 15

life insurers, including WNZL and Westpac Life-NZ-

Limited, to explain why conduct issues highlighted by

the Australian Royal Commission are not present in

New Zealand. An industry thematic review report for

the banks was released on 5 November 2018. WNZL

submitted a plan responding to recommendations in the

review report and in WNZL’s individual feedback letters

to the regulators on 29 March 2019.

The industry thematic review report into life insurers,

including Westpac Life-NZ-Limited, was released on

29 January 2019. The report identified extensive

weaknesses in life insurers’ systems and controls,

governance and management of conduct risks. Westpac

Life-NZ-Limited provided its plan to address the

findings to the regulators in June 2019.

Conduct of Financial Institutions Review

Following the developments and findings of the

Financial Services Conduct and Culture Review

and the Australian Royal Commission, the Minister

of Commerce announced a proposal to introduce

a conduct licensing regime for banks, insurers and

non-bank deposit takers in respect of their conduct

in relation to retail customers. The regime will require

licensed institutions to meet a fair treatment standard,

and implement effective policies, processes, systems

and controls to meet this standard. The regime will also

create obligations relating to remuneration and sales

incentives. Legislation is expected to be introduced to

parliament by the end of 2019.

Reform of Credit Contracts and Consumer Finance

Legislation

In April 2019, the Credit Contracts Legislation

Amendment Bill was introduced to parliament and

is currently before the select committee. The Bill

introduces a number of changes to the Credit Contracts

and Consumer Finance Act, including new duties for

directors and senior managers and increased penalties

and statutory damages. The Bill also introduces stricter

requirements around suitability and affordability

assessments as well as a cap for interest and fees of

‘high cost’ loans (being loans with annualised interest

exceeding 50%). The intention is that the Bill will come

into effect in March 2020.

23
2019 Westpac Group Annual Report

1

2

3

4

Information on Westpac

Supervision and regulation

Australia

Within Australia, we are subject to supervision and

regulation by six principal agencies and bodies: the

Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA);

the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA); the Australian

Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC); the

Australian Securities Exchange (ASX); the Australian

Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC); and

the Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis Centre

(AUSTRAC).

APRA is the prudential regulator of the Australian

financial services industry. It oversees banks, credit

unions, building societies, general insurance, re-

insurance, life insurance and private health insurance

companies, friendly societies and most of the

superannuation (pension) industry. APRA’s role includes

establishing and enforcing prudential standards

and practices designed to ensure that, under all

reasonable circumstances, financial promises made by

the institutions it supervises are met within a stable,

efficient and competitive financial system. APRA has

recently received new and strengthened powers under

the Banking Executive Accountability Regime.

As an ADI, we report prudential information to APRA,

including information in relation to capital adequacy,

large exposures, credit quality and liquidity. Our

controlled entities in Australia that are authorised

insurers and trustees of superannuation funds are also

subject to the APRA regulatory regime. Reporting is

supplemented by consultations, on-site inspections

and targeted reviews. Our external auditor also has

an obligation to report on compliance with certain

statutory and regulatory banking requirements and on

any matters that in their opinion may have the potential

to materially prejudice the interests of depositors and

other stakeholders.

Australia’s risk-based capital adequacy guidelines are

based on the approach agreed upon by the BCBS.

National discretion is then applied to that approach,

which has resulted in Australia’s capital requirements

being more stringent. Refer to ‘Capital resources – Basel

Capital Accord’ in Section 2.

The RBA is responsible for monetary policy, maintaining

financial system stability and promoting the safety and

efficiency of the payments system. The RBA is an active

participant in the financial markets, manages Australia’s

foreign reserves, issues Australian currency notes and

serves as banker to the Australian Government.

ASIC is the national regulator of Australian companies

and consumer protection within the financial sector.

Its primary responsibility is to regulate and enforce

company, consumer credit, financial markets and

financial products and services laws that protect

consumers, investors and creditors. With respect

to financial services, it promotes fairness and

transparency by providing consumer protection, using

regulatory powers to enforce laws relating to deposit-

taking activities, general insurance, life insurance,

superannuation, retirement savings accounts, securities

(such as shares, debentures and managed investments)

and futures contracts and financial advice. ASIC has

responsibility for supervising trading on Australia’s

domestic licensed markets and of trading participants.

ASIC has recently had its existing powers strengthened

to provide ASIC with a product intervention power. For

further information, refer to ‘Significant developments’

above.

The ASX operates Australia’s primary national market

for trading of securities issued by listed companies.

Some of our securities (including our ordinary shares)

are listed on the ASX and we therefore have obligations

to comply with the ASX Listing Rules, which have

statutory backing under the Corporations Act 2001

(Cth). The ASX has responsibility for the oversight

of listed entities under the ASX Listing Rules and

for monitoring and enforcing compliance with the

ASX Operating Rules by its market, clearing and

settlement participants. ASX is now also the benchmark

administrator of BBSW.

The ACCC is the regulator responsible for the regulation

and prohibition of anti-competitive and unfair market

practices and mergers and acquisitions in Australia. Its

broad objective is to administer the Competition and

Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) and related legislation to

bring greater competitiveness, fair trading, consumer

protection and product safety to the Australian

economy. The ACCC’s role in consumer protection

complements that of ASIC (for financial services) and

Australian state and territory consumer affairs agencies

that administer the unfair trading legislation of their

jurisdictions.

The Australian Government’s present policy, known

as the ‘four pillars policy’, is that there should be no

fewer than four major banks to maintain appropriate

levels of competition in the banking sector. Under the

Financial Sector (Shareholdings) Act 1998 (Cth), the

Australian Government’s Treasurer must approve an

entity acquiring a stake of more than 15% in a particular

financial sector company.

Proposals for foreign acquisitions of a stake in

Australian banks are subject to the Australian

Government’s foreign investment policy and, where

required, approval by the Australian Government under

the Australian Foreign Acquisitions and Takeovers

Act 1975 (Cth). For further details refer to ‘Limitations

affecting security holders’ in Section 4.

AUSTRAC oversees the compliance of Australian

reporting entities (including Westpac) with the

requirements under the Anti-Money Laundering and

Counter-Terrorism Financing Act 2006 (Cth) and the

Financial Transaction Reports Act 1988 (Cth). These

requirements include:

• implementing programs for identifying and

monitoring customers, and for managing the risks of

money laundering and terrorism financing;

• reporting suspicious matters, threshold transactions

and international funds transfer instructions; and

• submitting an annual compliance report.

AUSTRAC provides financial information to Australian

federal law enforcement, national security, human

services and revenue agencies, and certain international

counterparts.

New Zealand

The Reserve Bank of New Zealand (RBNZ) is

responsible for supervising New Zealand registered

banks and protects the financial stability of New

Zealand through the application of minimum prudential

obligations. The New Zealand prudential supervision

regime requires that registered banks publish disclosure

statements, which contain information on financial

performance and risk positions as well as attestations

by the directors about the bank’s compliance with its

conditions of registration and certain other matters.

242019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Information on Westpac

The Financial Markets Authority (FMA) and the New

Zealand Commerce Commission (NZCC) are the two

primary conduct and enforcement regulators. The FMA

and NZCC are responsible for ensuring that markets are

fair and transparent and are supported by confident

and informed investors and consumers. Regulation of

markets and their participants is undertaken through

a combination of market supervision, corporate

governance and licensing approvals.

In New Zealand, other relevant regulator mandates

include those relating to taxation, privacy and foreign

affairs and trade.

Banks in New Zealand are also subject to a number of

self- regulatory regimes. Examples include Payments

NZ, the New Zealand Bankers’ Association and the

Financial Services Council (FSC). Examples of industry

agreed codes include the New Zealand Bankers’

Association’s Code of Banking Practice and FSC’s Code

of Conduct.

United States

Our New York branch is a US federally licensed branch

and therefore is subject to supervision, examination and

regulation by the US Office of the Comptroller of the

Currency and the Board of Governors of the Federal

Reserve System (the US Federal Reserve) under the

US International Banking Act of 1978 (IBA) and related

regulations.

A US federal branch must maintain, with a US Federal

Reserve member bank, a capital equivalency deposit

as prescribed by the US Comptroller of the Currency,

which is at least equal to 5% of its total liabilities

(including acceptances, but excluding accrued

expenses, and amounts due and other liabilities to

other branches, agencies and subsidiaries of the foreign

bank).

In addition, a US federal branch is subject to

periodic onsite examination by the US Comptroller

of the Currency. Such examination may address risk

management, operations, asset quality, compliance with

the record-keeping and reporting, and any additional

requirements prescribed by the US Comptroller of the

Currency from time to time.

A US federal branch of a foreign bank is, by virtue of the

IBA, subject to the receivership powers exercisable by

the US Comptroller of the Currency.

As of 22 June 2016, we elected to be treated as a

financial holding company in the US pursuant to

the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 and Federal

Reserve Board Regulation Y. Our election will remain

effective so long as we meet certain capital and

management standards prescribed by the US Federal

Reserve.

Westpac and some of its affiliates are engaged in

various activities that are subject to regulation by

other US federal regulatory agencies, including the

US Securities and Exchange Commission, the US

Commodity Futures Trading Commission and the

National Futures Association.

Anti-money laundering regulation and

related requirements

Australia

Westpac has a Group-wide program to manage

its obligations under the Anti-Money Laundering

and Counter- Terrorism Financing Act 2006 (Cth).

We continue to actively engage with the regulator,

AUSTRAC, on our activities.

Our Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism

Financing Policy (AML/CTF Policy) sets out how the

Westpac Group complies with its legislative obligations.

The AML/CTF Policy applies to all business divisions

and employees (permanent, temporary and third party

providers) working in Australia, New Zealand and

overseas.

United States

The USA PATRIOT Act of 2001 requires US financial

institutions, including the US branches of foreign banks,

to take certain steps to prevent, detect and report

individuals and entities involved in international money

laundering and the financing of terrorism. The required

actions include verifying the identity of financial

institutions and other customers and counterparties,

terminating correspondent accounts for foreign ‘shell

banks’ and obtaining information about the owners

of foreign bank clients and the identity of the foreign

bank’s agent for service of process in the US. The anti-

money laundering compliance requirements of the

USA PATRIOT Act include requirements to adopt and

implement an effective anti-money laundering program,

report suspicious transactions or activities, and

implement due diligence procedures for correspondent

and other customer accounts. Westpac’s New York

branch and Westpac Capital Markets LLC maintain an

anti-money laundering compliance program designed

to address US legal requirements.

US economic and trade sanctions, as administered by

the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), prohibit or

significantly restrict US financial institutions, including

the US branches and operations of foreign banks, and

other US persons from doing business with certain

persons, entities and jurisdictions. Westpac’s New York

branch and Westpac Capital Markets LLC maintain

compliance programs designed to comply with OFAC

sanctions programs, and Westpac has a Group-wide

program to ensure adequate compliance.

Legal proceedings

Our entities are defendants from time to time in legal

proceedings arising from the conduct of our business.

Material legal proceedings, if any, are described

in Note 27 to the financial statements and under

‘Significant developments’ above. Where appropriate

as required by the accounting standards, a provision

has been raised in respect of these proceedings and

disclosed in the financial statements.

Principal office

Our principal office is located at 275 Kent Street,

Sydney, New South Wales, 2000, Australia. Our

telephone number for calls within Australia is (+61) 2

9155 7713 and our international telephone number is

(+61) 2 9155 7700.

25
2019 Westpac Group Annual Report

1

2

3

4

Information on Westpac

Corporate governance statement

Corporate governance is the framework of systems,

policies and processes by which we operate, make

decisions and hold people to account. The framework

establishes the roles and responsibilities of Westpac’s

Board and management. It also establishes the systems,

policies and processes for monitoring and evaluating

Board and management performance and the practices

for corporate reporting, disclosure, remuneration, risk

management and engagement of security holders.

Our approach to corporate governance is based on a

set of values and behaviours that underpin our day-

to-day activities, provide transparency and fair dealing

and seek to protect stakeholder interests. It includes

a commitment to maintaining the highest standards

of corporate governance, which Westpac sees as

fundamental to the sustainability of our business and

our performance.

We regularly review local and global developments in

corporate governance to assess their implications and

to respond to changes in the operating environment.

We also improve our systems, processes and policies

and look to strengthen our frameworks to reflect

changing expectations where appropriate.

We comply with the ASX Corporate Governance

Principles and Recommendations (third edition)

published by the ASX Limited’s Corporate Governance

Council. In addition, we already comply with a number

of the recommendations contained in the fourth edition

of the ASX Corporate Governance Principles and

Recommendations.

Westpac’s 2019 Corporate Governance Statement and a

range of documents referred to in it are available on our

corporate governance website at www.westpac.com.au/

corpgov. This website contains copies and summaries

of charters, principles and policies referred to in the

Corporate Governance Statement.

Websites

Investor communications and information, including this

2019 Westpac Group Annual Report, the 2019 Westpac

Group Annual Review and Sustainability Report, the

2019 Westpac Group Sustainability Performance Report

and investor discussion packs and presentations can be

accessed at www.westpac.com.au/investorcentre.

Information on Westpac

262019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Directors’ report

Directors’ report

Name: Lindsay Maxsted,

DipBus (Gordon), FCA, FAICD

Age: 65

Term of office: Director since

March 2008 and Chairman since

December 2011.

Date of next scheduled re-election:

December 2020.

Independent: Yes.

Current directorships of listed

entities and dates of office:

Transurban Group (since March 2008

and Chairman since August 2010),

BHP Group Limited (since March 2011)

and BHP Group plc (since March 2011).

Other principal directorships:

Managing Director of Align Capital Pty

Ltd and Director of Baker Heart and

Diabetes Institute.

Other interests: Nil.

Other Westpac related entities

directorships and dates of office: Nil.

Skills, experience and expertise:

Lindsay was formerly a partner at

KPMG and was the CEO of that firm

from 2001 to 2007. His principal area

of practice prior to his becoming CEO

was in the corporate recovery field

managing a number of Australia’s

largest insolvency/workout/turnaround

engagements including Linter Textiles

(companies associated with Abraham

Goldberg), Bell Publishing Group,

Bond Brewing, McEwans Hardware

and Brashs. He is also a former

Director and Chairman of the Victorian

Public Transport Corporation.

Westpac Board Committee

membership: Chairman of the Board

Nominations Committee. Member of

each of the Board Audit and Board

Risk & Compliance Committees.

Directorships of other listed entities

over the past three years and dates

of office: Nil.

Name: Brian Hartzer,

BA, CFA

Age: 52

Term of office: Managing Director &

Chief Executive Officer since

February 2015.

Date of next scheduled re-election:

Not applicable.

Independent: No.

Current directorships of listed

entities and dates of office: Nil.

Other principal directorships:

The Australian National University

Business and Industry Advisory

Board (Chairman since March 2017),

the Financial Markets Foundation

for Children and Australian Banking

Association Incorporated.

Other interests: Nil.

Other Westpac related entities

directorships and dates of office: Nil.

Skills, experience and expertise: Brian

was appointed Managing Director &

Chief Executive Officer in February

2015. Brian joined Westpac as Chief

Executive, Australian Financial Services

in June 2012, encompassing Westpac

Retail & Business Banking, St.George

Banking Group and BT Financial

Group. Prior to joining Westpac, Brian

spent three years in the UK as CEO for

Retail, Wealth and Ulster Bank at the

Royal Bank of Scotland Group.

Prior to that, he spent ten years with

Australia and New Zealand Banking

Group Limited (ANZ) in Australia in a

variety of roles, including his final role

as CEO, Australia and Global Segment

Lead for Retail and Wealth. Before

joining ANZ, Brian spent ten years as

a financial services consultant in New

York, San Francisco and Melbourne.

Westpac Board Committee

membership: Member of the Board

Technology Committee.

Directorships of other listed entities

over the past three years and dates

of office: Nil.

Our Directors present

their report together

with the financial

statements of the Group

for the financial year

ended 30 September

2019.

1. Directors

The names of the persons

who have been Directors, or

appointed as Directors, during

the period since 1 October 2018

and up to the date of this report

are: Lindsay Philip Maxsted,

Brian Charles Hartzer, Nerida

Frances Caesar, Ewen Graham

Wolseley Crouch, Catriona

Alison Deans (Alison Deans),

Craig William Dunn, Yuen Mei

Anita Fung (Anita Fung), Steven

John Harker (Director from

1 March 2019), Peter John Oswin

Hawkins (retired as a Director on

12 December 2018), Peter Ralph

Marriott, Peter Stanley Nash and

Margaret Leone Seale (Director

from 1 March 2019).

Particulars of the skills,

experience, expertise and

responsibilities of the Directors

at the date of this report,

including all directorships of

other listed companies held

by a Director at any time in

the three years immediately

before 30 September 2019

and the period for which each

directorship has been held, are

set out in the following pages.

272019 Westpac Group Annual Report
1

2

3

4

Directors’ report

Name: Ewen Crouch AM,

BEc (Hons.), LLB, FAICD

Age: 63

Term of office: Director since

February 2013.

Date of next scheduled re-election:

December 2019.

Independent: Yes.

Current directorships of listed

entities and dates of office: Corporate

Travel Management Limited (Chairman

since March 2019) and BlueScope

Steel Limited (since March 2013).

Other principal directorships: Sydney

Symphony Orchestra Holdings Pty

Limited and Jawun.

Other interests: Member of the

Commonwealth Remuneration

Tribunal, Law Committee of the

Australian Institute of Company

Directors, Corporations Committee

of the Law Council of Australia and

ASIC’s Director Advisory Panel.

Other Westpac related entities

directorships and dates of office: Nil.

Skills, experience and expertise:

Ewen was a Partner at Allens from

1988 to 2013, where he was one

of Australia’s most accomplished

mergers and acquisitions lawyers.

He served as a member of the firm’s

board for 11 years, including four years

as Chairman of Partners. His other

roles at Allens included Co-Head

Mergers and Acquisitions and Equity

Capital Markets, Executive Partner,

Asian offices and Deputy Managing

Partner. Ewen served as a director of

Mission Australia from 1995 and as

Chairman from 2009, before retiring

in November 2016. From 2010 to 2015,

Ewen was a member of the Takeovers

Panel. In 2013, Ewen was awarded

an Order of Australia in recognition

of his significant service to the law

as a contributor to legal professional

organisations and to the community.

Westpac Board Committee

membership: Chairman of the Board

Risk & Compliance Committee.

Member of each of the Board Audit,

Board Nominations and Board

Remuneration Committees.

Directorships of other listed entities

over the past three years and dates

of office: Nil.

Name: Nerida Caesar,

BCom, MBA, GAICD

Age: 55

Term of office: Director since

September 2017.

Date of next scheduled re-election:

December 2019.

Independent: Yes.

Current directorships of listed

entities and dates of office: Nil.

Other principal directorships:

Workplace Giving Australia Limited

(Chairman since June 2019) and Spark

Investment Holdco Pty Ltd.

Other interests: Member of the

Advisory Board of IXUP Limited.

Advisor to Equifax Australia and

New Zealand.

Other Westpac related entities

directorships and dates of office: Nil.

Skills, experience and expertise:

Nerida has over 30 years of broad-

ranging commercial and business

management experience. She was

Group Managing Director and Chief

Executive Officer, Australia and New

Zealand, of Equifax (formerly Veda

Group Limited) from February 2011

to June 2017. Nerida is also a former

director of Genome.One Pty Ltd and

Stone and Chalk Limited.

Ms Caesar was formerly Group

Managing Director, Telstra Enterprise

and Government, responsible for

Telstra’s corporate, government and

large business customers in Australia

as well as the international sales

division. Nerida also worked as Group

Managing Director, Telstra Wholesale,

and, prior to that, held the position

of Executive Director Enterprise

& Government, where she was

responsible for managing products,

services, and customer relationships

throughout Australia.

Nerida also held several senior

management and sales positions with

IBM within Australia and internationally

over a 20-year period, including as

Vice President of IBM’s Intel Server

Division for the Asia Pacific region.

Westpac Board Committee

membership: Member of each of the

Board Risk & Compliance and Board

Technology Committees.

Directorships of other listed entities

over the past three years and dates

of office: Nil.

Name: Alison Deans,

BA, MBA, GAICD

Age: 51

Term of office: Director since

April 2014.

Date of next scheduled re-election:

December 2020.

Independent: Yes.

Current directorships of listed

entities and dates of office: Cochlear

Limited (since January 2015) and

Ramsay Health Care Limited (since

November 2018).

Other principal directorships:

SCEGGS Darlinghurst Limited, The

Observership Program Limited and

Deputy Group Pty Ltd.

Other interests: Senior Advisor,

McKinsey & Company and Investment

Committee member of the CSIRO

Innovation Fund (Main Sequence

Ventures).

Other Westpac related entities

directorships and dates of office: Nil.

Skills, experience and expertise:

Alison has more than 20 years’

experience in senior executive roles

focused on building digital businesses

and digital transformation across

e-commerce, media and financial

services. During this time, Alison

served as the CEO of eCorp Limited,

CEO of Hoyts Cinemas and CEO of

eBay, Australia and New Zealand. She

was the CEO of a technology-based

investment company netus Pty Ltd.

Alison was an Independent Director

of Social Ventures Australia from

September 2007 to April 2013 and a

director of kikki.K Holdings Pty Ltd

from October 2014 to June 2018.

Westpac Board Committee

membership: Chairman of the Board

Technology Committee. Member

of each of the Board Nominations,

Board Remuneration and Board Risk &

Compliance Committees.

Directorships of other listed entities

over the past three years and

dates of office: Insurance Australia

Group Limited (February 2013 –

October 2017).

282019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Directors’ report

Directors’ report

Name: Anita Fung,

BSocSc, MAppFin

Age: 58

Term of office: Director since

October 2018.

Date of next scheduled re-election:

December 2021.

Independent: Yes.

Current directorships of listed

entities and dates of office: Hong

Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited

(since April 2015, Hong Kong listed),

China Construction Bank Corporation

(since October 2016, Hong Kong

Listed) and Hang Lung Properties

Limited (since May 2015, Hong Kong

listed).

Other principal directorships: Board

member of the Airport Authority Hong

Kong.

Other interests: Member of the Hong

Kong Museum Advisory Committee.

Other Westpac related entities

directorships and dates of office:

Member of Westpac’s Asia Advisory

Board since October 2018.

Skills, experience and expertise:

Anita’s career in the banking industry

spans over 30 years, including 19 years

at HSBC.

During her time at HSBC, Anita held a

number of senior management roles

including Group General Manager,

HSBC Group and most recently as

Chief Executive Officer, Hong Kong

from 2011 to 2015.

Prior to joining HSBC, Anita held

various positions at Standard

Chartered Bank in its Treasury and

Capital markets business.

Westpac Board Committee

membership: Member of the Board

Risk & Compliance Committee.

Directorships of other listed entities

over the past three years and dates

of office: Nil.

Name: Craig Dunn,

BCom, FCA

Age: 56

Term of office: Director since

June 2015.

Date of next scheduled re-election:

December 2021.

Independent: Yes.

Current directorships of listed

entities and dates of office: Telstra

Corporation Limited (since April 2016).

Other principal directorships:

Chairman of The Australian Ballet.

Other interests: Chairman of the

International Standards Technical

Committee on Blockchain and

Distributed Ledger Technologies (ISO/

TC 307) and consultant to King &

Wood Mallesons.

Other Westpac related entities

directorships and dates of office: Nil.

Skills, experience and expertise: Craig

has more than 20 years’ experience

in financial services, including as

CEO of AMP Limited from 2008 to

2013. Craig was previously a director

of Financial Literacy Australia

Limited, a Board member of each

of the Australian Japanese Business

Cooperation Committee, Jobs for

New South Wales, and the New

South Wales Government’s Financial

Services Knowledge Hub. He is the

former Chairman of Stone and Chalk

Limited and of the Investment and

Financial Services Association (now

the Financial Services Council). Craig

was also a member of the Financial

Services Advisory Committee, the

Australian Financial Centre Forum,

the Consumer and Financial Literacy

Taskforce and a Panel member of the

Australian Government’s Financial

System Inquiry.

Westpac Board Committee

membership: Chairman of the Board

Remuneration Committee. Member of

each of the Board Nominations and

Board Risk & Compliance Committees.

Directorships of other listed entities

over the past three years and dates

of office: Nil.

Name: Steven Harker,

BEc (Hons.), LLB

Age: 64

Term of office: Director since

March 2019.

Date of next scheduled re-election:

December 2019.

Independent: Yes.

Current directorships of listed

entities and dates of office: Nil.

Other principal directorships: The

Banking and Finance Oath Limited,

The Hunger Project Australia, ASX

Refinitiv Charity Foundation, New

South Wales Golf Club Foundation

Limited and Ascham School Ltd.

Other interests: Honorary Treasurer of

Ascham School.

Other Westpac related entities

directorships and dates of office: Nil.

Skills, experience and expertise:

Steve has over 35 years of experience

in investment banking. Steve was

formerly Managing Director and Chief

Executive Officer of Morgan Stanley

Australia from 1998 to 2016 and then

Vice Chairman until February 2019.

Prior to joining Morgan Stanley, he

spent fifteen years with Barclays de

Zoete Wedd (BZW, now Barclays

Investment Bank).

Steve is a former Chairman and

Director of Australian Financial

Markets Association Limited and a

former Director of Investa Property

Group. Steve also previously served

on the board of the Centre for

International Finance and Regulation.

He is also a former Guardian of the

Future Fund of Australia.

Westpac Board Committee

membership: Member of each of

the Board Audit and Board Risk &

Compliance Committees.

Directorships of other listed entities

over the past three years and dates

of office: Nil.

292019 Westpac Group Annual Report
1

2

3

4

Directors’ report

Directors’ report

Name: Peter Nash,

BCom, FCA, F Fin

Age: 57

Term of office: Director since

March 2018.

Date of next scheduled re-election:

December 2021.

Independent: Yes.

Current directorships of listed

entities and dates of office: Johns

Lyng Group Limited (Chairman since

October 2017), Mirvac Group (since

November 2018) and ASX Limited

(since June 2019).

Other principal directorships:

Reconciliation Australia Limited and

Golf Victoria Limited.

Other interests: Board member

of the Koorie Heritage Trust and

Migration Council Australia. Member

of the University of Melbourne Centre

for Contemporary Chinese Studies

Advisory Board.

Other Westpac related entities

directorships and dates of office: Nil.

Skills, experience and expertise: Peter

was formerly a Senior Partner with

KPMG until September 2017, having

been admitted to the partnership

of KPMG Australia in 1993. He most

recently served as the National

Chairman of KPMG Australia from

2011 until August 2017, where he was

responsible for the overall governance

and strategic positioning of KPMG in

Australia. In this role, Peter also served

as a member of KPMG’s Global and

Regional Boards.

Peter has experience providing

advice on a range of topics

including business strategy, risk

management, internal controls,

business processes and regulatory

change. He has also provided both

financial and commercial advice to

many Government businesses at

both a Federal and State level. Peter

is a former member of the Business

Council of Australia and its Economic

and Regulatory Committee.

Westpac Board Committee

membership: Member of each of

the Board Audit and Board Risk &

Compliance Committees.

Directorships of other listed entities

over the past three years and dates

of office: Nil.

Name: Peter Marriott,

BEc (Hons.), FCA

Age: 62

Term of office: Director since

June 2013.

Date of next scheduled re-election:

December 2019.

Independent: Yes.

Current directorships of listed

entities and dates of office: ASX

Limited (since July 2009).

Other principal directorships: ASX

Clearing Corporation Limited, ASX

Settlement Corporation Limited and

Austraclear Limited.

Other interests: Member of Monash

University Council and Chairman of the

Monash University Council’s Resources

and Finance Committee.

Other Westpac related entities

directorships and dates of office: Nil.

Skills, experience and expertise: Peter

has over 30 years’ experience in senior

management roles in the finance

industry, encompassing international

banking, finance and auditing. Peter

joined Australia and New Zealand

Banking Group Limited (ANZ) in 1993

and held the role of Chief Financial

Officer from July 1997 to May 2012.

Prior to his career at ANZ, Peter was

a banking and finance, audit and

consulting partner at KPMG Peat

Marwick. Peter was formerly a Director

of ANZ National Bank Limited in New

Zealand and various ANZ subsidiaries.

Westpac Board Committee

membership: Chairman of the

Board Audit Committee. Member

of each of the Board Nominations,

Board Technology and Board Risk &

Compliance Committees.

Directorships of other listed entities

over the past three years and dates

of office: Nil.

Name: Margaret (Margie) Seale,

BA, FAICD

Age: 59

Term of office: Director since

March 2019.

Date of next scheduled re-election:

December 2019.

Independent: Yes.

Current directorships of listed

entities and dates of office: Telstra

Corporation Limited (since May 2012)

and Scentre Group Limited (since

February 2016).

Other principal directorships:

Australian Pacific (Holdings) Pty

Limited.

Other interests: Member of the

Australian Public Service Commission

Centre for Learning and Leadership

Advisory Board.

Other Westpac related entities

directorships and dates of office: Nil.

Skills, experience and expertise:

Margie has more than 25 years’

experience in senior executive

roles in Australia and overseas,

including in consumer goods, global

publishing, sales and marketing,

and the successful transition of

traditional business models to

digital environments. Prior to her

non-executive career, Margie was

the Managing Director of Random

House Australia and New Zealand

and President, Asia Development for

Random House Inc.

Margie is a former Director and

then Chair of Penguin Random

House Australia Pty Limited, and a

former Director of Ramsay Health

Care Limited, Bank of Queensland

Limited and the Australian Publishers’

Association. She also previously served

on the boards of Chief Executive

Women (chairing its Scholarship

Committee), the Powerhouse Museum,

and the Sydney Writers Festival.

Westpac Board Committee

membership: Member of each of the

Board Remuneration and Board Risk &

Compliance Committees.

Directorships of other listed entities

over the past three years and dates

of office: Ramsay Health Care Limited

(April 2015 to October 2018) and Bank

of Queensland Limited (January 2014

to June 2018).

302019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Directors’ report

Company Secretary

Our Company Secretaries as at 30 September 2019 were Rebecca Lim and Tim Hartin.

Rebecca Lim (B Econ, LLB (Hons.)) was appointed Group Executive, Compliance, Legal & Secretariat

1

and

Company Secretary in October 2016. Rebecca joined Westpac in 2002 and has held a variety of senior leadership

roles including General Manager, Human Resources for St.George Bank and General Manager, St.George Private

Clients. She was appointed Group General Counsel in November 2011 and Chief Compliance Officer from 2013

to 2017. Rebecca held an in-house role in investment banking at Goldman Sachs in London before returning to

Australia and joining Westpac. Rebecca was previously with US firm Skadden Arps where she worked in the

Corporate Finance area in both New York and London. Prior to that she worked at Blake Dawson Waldron (now

Ashurst) as a solicitor.

Tim Hartin (LLB (Hons.)) was appointed Group Company Secretary in November 2011. Before that appointment,

Tim was Head of Legal - Risk Management & Workouts, Counsel & Secretariat and prior to that, he was Counsel,

Corporate Core. Before joining Westpac in 2006, Tim was a Consultant with Gilbert + Tobin, where he provided

corporate advisory services to ASX listed companies. Tim was previously a lawyer at Henderson Boyd Jackson W.S.

in Scotland and in London in Herbert Smith’s corporate and corporate finance division.

2. Executive Team

As at 30 September 2019 our Executive Team was:

Name Position

Year Joined

Group

Year

Appointed

to Position

Brian HartzerManaging Director & Chief Executive Officer20122015

Craig BrightChief Information Officer20182018

Lyn CobleyChief Executive, Westpac Institutional Bank20152015

Peter KingChief Financial Officer19942014

Rebecca LimGroup Executive, Legal & Secretariat20022016

David LindbergChief Executive, Consumer20122019

Carolyn McCannGroup Executive, Customer & Corporate Relations20132018

David McLeanChief Executive Officer, Westpac New Zealand19992015

Christine ParkerGroup Executive, Human Resources20072011

David StephenChief Risk Officer20182018

Gary ThursbyChief Operating Officer20082019

Alastair WelshActing Chief Executive, Business19922019

There are no family relationships between or among any of our Directors or Executive Team members.

1. From 1 October 2018, Rebecca Lim’s role and title has been Group Executive, Legal & Secretariat.

312019 Westpac Group Annual Report
1

2

3

4

Directors’ report

Craig Bright

B.Comp.

Age: 54

Chief Information Officer

Craig was appointed Group Chief

Information Officer in December

2018. Craig has more than 30 years’

experience in technology and financial

services. He has held divisional CIO

roles in retail banking, business

banking and investment banking and

led complex global scale technology

operations.

Prior to joining Westpac, Craig was

Chief Technology Officer, Global

Consumer Bank at Citigroup. He led

a division of technology employees

executing a cloud and mobile first

strategy supporting digital channels

and a mix of Citi Smart Banking

formats worldwide. Craig has also held

senior roles at Barclays in London,

National Australia Bank and Ernst &

Young.

Craig has a Bachelor of Computing

from Monash University and a

Computer Field Service Certificate

from Royal Melbourne Institute of

Technology.

Brian Hartzer

BA, CFA.

Age: 52

Managing Director & Chief Executive

Officer

Brian was appointed Managing

Director & Chief Executive Officer in

February 2015. Brian joined Westpac

as Chief Executive, Australian Financial

Services in June 2012, encompassing

Westpac Retail & Business Banking,

St.George Banking Group and BT

Financial Group.

Brian is a Director of the Australian

Banking Association and was formerly

the Chairman until December 2015.

Prior to joining Westpac, Brian spent

three years in the UK as CEO for

Retail, Wealth and Ulster Bank at the

Royal Bank of Scotland Group. Prior to

that, he spent ten years with Australia

and New Zealand Banking Group

Limited (ANZ) in Australia in a variety

of roles, including his final role as CEO,

Australia and Global Segment Lead for

Retail and Wealth. Before joining ANZ,

Brian spent ten years as a financial

services consultant in New York, San

Francisco and Melbourne.

Brian graduated from Princeton

University with a degree in European

History and is a Chartered Financial

Analyst.

Lyn Cobley

BEc, SF FIN, GAICD.

Age: 56

Chief Executive, Westpac Institutional

Bank

Lyn was appointed Chief Executive,

Westpac Institutional Bank in

September 2015. She has responsibility

for Westpac’s global relationships

with corporate, institutional and

government clients as well as all

products across financial and capital

markets, transactional banking,

structured finance and working capital

payments. In addition, Lyn oversees

Westpac’s International and Pacific

Island businesses.

Lyn has over 27 years’ experience

in financial services. Prior to joining

Westpac, Lyn held a variety of senior

positions at the Commonwealth Bank

of Australia, including serving as Group

Treasurer from 2007 to 2013 and most

recently as Executive General Manager,

Retail Products & Third Party Banking.

She also held senior roles at Barclays

Capital in Australia and Citibank in

Australia and Asia Pacific, and was

CEO of Trading Room (a joint venture

between Macquarie Bank and Fairfax).

Lyn is a Board member of the

Australian Financial Markets

Association (AFMA), the Banking

& Finance Oath and the Westpac

Foundation. She is Chairman of

Westpac’s Asia Advisory Board and

is also a member of Chief Executive

Women.

Lyn has a Bachelor of Economics

from Macquarie University, is a Senior

Fellow of the Financial Services

Institute of Australia and is a graduate

of the Australian Institute of Company

Directors.

322019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Directors’ report

Rebecca Lim

B Econ, LLB (Hons).

Age: 47

Group Executive, Legal & Secretariat

Rebecca was appointed as a Westpac

Group Executive in October 2016 and

is responsible for legal and secretariat

functions globally. She was appointed

Group General Counsel in November

2011 and was Chief Compliance Officer

from 2013 to 2017.

Rebecca joined Westpac in 2002

and has held a variety of other senior

leadership roles including General

Manager, Human Resources for

St.George Bank and General Manager,

St.George Private Clients.

Rebecca began her career at Blake

Dawson Waldron (now Ashurst) before

joining the US firm Skadden Arps

where she worked in both New York

and London. Rebecca then moved into

an in-house role in investment banking

at Goldman Sachs in London before

returning to Australia and joining

Westpac.

Rebecca is Deputy Chair of the GC100

Executive Committee and a member

of Chief Executive Women.

Peter King

BEc, FCA.

Age: 49

Chief Financial Officer

Peter was appointed Chief Financial

Officer in April 2014. Peter has

responsibility for Westpac’s Finance,

Tax, Treasury and Investor Relations

functions.

Prior to this appointment, Peter was

the Deputy Chief Financial Officer for

three years and has held other senior

finance positions across the Group,

including in Group Finance, Business

and Consumer Banking, Business and

Technology Services, Treasury and

Financial Markets.

Peter commenced his career at

Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu. He has

a Bachelor of Economics from

Sydney University and completed the

Advanced Management Programme at

INSEAD. He is a Fellow of the Institute

of Chartered Accountants.

David Lindberg

HBA (Hons. Economics).

Age: 44

Chief Executive, Consumer

David was appointed Chief Executive,

Consumer in April 2019, responsible

for the end to end relationships with

consumer customers. This includes

all consumer distribution, digital,

marketing, banking and insurance

products and services under the

Westpac, St.George, BankSA, Bank

of Melbourne, BT, and RAMS brands.

Prior to this appointment, David was

Chief Executive, Business Bank from

June 2015, managing relationships

with business customers for the

Westpac, St.George, BankSA and Bank

of Melbourne brands.

Before this David was Chief Product

Officer for the Group’s retail and

business products, as well as

overseeing the Group’s digital

activities. Before joining Westpac in

2012, David was Executive General

Manager, Cards, Payments & Retail

Strategy at the Commonwealth Bank

of Australia. David was also formerly

Managing Director, Strategy, Marketing

& Customer Segmentation at Australia

and New Zealand Banking Group

Limited and Vice President and Head

of Australia for First Manhattan.

332019 Westpac Group Annual Report
1

2

3

4

Directors’ report

David McLean

LLB (Hons.).

Age: 61

Chief Executive Officer, Westpac New

Zealand

David was appointed Chief Executive

Officer, Westpac New Zealand in

February 2015. Since joining Westpac

in February 1999, David has held a

number of senior roles, including Head

of Debt Capital Markets New Zealand,

General Manager, Private, Wealth and

Insurance New Zealand and Head

of Westpac Institutional Bank New

Zealand, and most recently, Managing

Director of the Westpac New York

branch.

Before joining Westpac, David was

Director, Capital Markets at Deutsche

Morgan Grenfell from 1994. He also

established the New Zealand branch of

Deutsche Bank and was New Zealand

Resident Branch Manager. In 1988,

David joined Southpac/National Bank

as a Capital Markets Executive. Prior

to this, David worked as a lawyer in

private practice and also served as

in-house counsel for NatWest NZ from

1985.

Carolyn McCann

BBus (Com), BA, GradDipAppFin,

GAICD.

Age: 47

Group Executive, Customer &

Corporate Relations

Carolyn was appointed as Westpac’s

Group Executive, Customer &

Corporate Relations in June 2018.

This division brings together

management of the Group’s

customer resolution and reporting,

alongside our corporate affairs,

communications and sustainability

functions, recognising the importance

of setting high service standards and

quickly resolving customer issues in

managing the Group’s relationship

with its customers. Carolyn joined

the Westpac Group in 2013, as

General Manager, Corporate Affairs

& Sustainability, during which time

she played an instrumental role in

leading the Group’s bicentenary

program, including the launch of the

$100 million Westpac Scholars Trust

(formerly known as the Westpac

Bicentennial Foundation).

Prior to joining Westpac, Carolyn

spent 13 years at Insurance Australia

Group in various positions, including

Group General Manager, Corporate

Affairs & Investor Relations. Carolyn

began her career in consulting and

has extensive experience in financial

services.

Christine Parker

BGDipBus (HRM).

Age: 59

Group Executive, Human Resources

Christine was appointed to Westpac

Group’s Executive Team in October

2011. As Group Executive, Human

Resources, Christine leads the HR

function for the Group, responsible

for strengthening our service oriented

and inclusive culture, attracting and

retaining the best talent, developing

and helping our workforce to grow

skills for the future, rewarding and

recognising our people and ensuring

the health and wellbeing of our

people. Christine also oversees the

Group’s Customer Advocate function,

corporate communications, and

supports the CEO and Board on

culture and conduct. Christine also has

responsibility for Office of the Banking

Executive Accountability Regime.

Since joining Westpac in 2007,

Christine has held a variety of senior

leadership roles including Group

General Manager, Human Resources

and General Manager, Human

Resources for Westpac New Zealand

Limited. Before joining Westpac,

Christine held senior HR roles in a

number of high profile organisations

and across a range of industries,

including Carter Holt Harvey and

Restaurant Brands New Zealand.

Christine was previously a Director

of Women’s Community Shelters

and is a current member of Chief

Executive Women, Governor of

St.George Foundation and member

of the Veterans’ Employment Industry

Advisory Committee.

342019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Directors’ report

Gary Thursby

BEc, DipAcc, FCA.

Age: 56

Chief Operating Officer

Gary was appointed Chief Operating

Officer in April 2019, having previously

been in the role of Group Executive,

Strategy & Enterprise Services since

October 2016. In addition to leading

the Group’s strategy function, his

role is designed to support delivery

of the Group’s Service Revolution

and provide services to support the

Group’s operating businesses.

Gary’s responsibilities also include

banking operations, advice

remediation, procurement, property,

analytics and enterprise investments.

In addition, Gary oversees the Group’s

corporate and business development

portfolios.

Before joining Westpac in 2008,

Gary held a number of senior finance

roles at Commonwealth Bank of

Australia including Deputy CFO and

CFO Retail Bank. Gary has over 20

years’ experience in financial services,

covering finance, M&A and large scale

program delivery. He commenced his

career at Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu.

Gary has a Bachelor of Economics

and a Post Graduate Diploma in

Accounting from Flinders University of

South Australia and is a Fellow of the

Institute of Chartered Accountants.

David Stephen

BBus.

Age: 55

Chief Risk Officer

David was appointed Chief Risk Officer

in October 2018, with responsibility

for risk management and compliance

activities across the Group.

Prior to this, David was the Chief Risk

Officer for Royal Bank of Scotland

(RBS) from 2013, having first joined

RBS in 2010 as the Deputy Chief Risk

Officer. David has also previously held

other senior roles at both retail and

investment banks in the UK, USA,

Hong Kong and Australia, including

serving as Chief Risk Officer at ANZ

and Chief Credit Officer at Credit

Suisse Financial Products.

David has a Bachelor of Business in

Banking and Finance from Monash

University and is a Board member of

both the International Financial Risk

Institute and the Financial Services

Institute of Australia (FINSIA).

Alastair Welsh

MBA, BCA, CA.

Age: 54

Acting Chief Executive, Business

Alastair was appointed Acting Chief

Executive, Business in April 2019.

The Business division leads

relationships with Australia’s small,

commercial, corporate and agri

businesses providing a wide range of

banking services and support across

Westpac, St George, BankSA, Bank of

Melbourne and Capital Finance brands.

The division also supports customers’

wealth and investment needs including

Private Wealth, Superannuation,

Platforms, Investments and Operations

businesses through all of our brands.

Alastair holds more than 30 years’

experience in banking in the UK, New

Zealand and Australia. Since joining

Westpac NZ in 1992, he has held a

variety of roles from relationship

management through to leadership

positions for Small Business Banking,

BT Financial Group and Group

Customer Transformation. Prior to this

appointment, Alastair was General

Manager for the Westpac Commercial

Business Bank.

352019 Westpac Group Annual Report
1

2

3

4

Directors’ report

3. Report on the business

a) Principal activities

The principal activities of the Group during the

financial year ended 30 September 2019 were the

provision of financial services including lending, deposit

taking, payments services, investment platforms,

superannuation and funds management, insurance

services, leasing finance, general finance, interest rate

risk management and foreign exchange services.

From 30 June 2019 and 30 September 2019 respectively,

Westpac ceased to provide personal financial advice

through its salaried BT Financial Group planners or its

authorised representatives. Other than this change, there

have been no significant changes in the nature of the

principal activities of the Group during 2019.

b) Operating and financial review

The net profit attributable to owners of Westpac

Banking Corporation for 2019 was $6,784 million, a

decrease of $1,311 million or 16% compared to 2018. Key

features of this result were:

• Net interest income increased $402 million or 2%

compared to 2018 driven by an increase of $686

million due to the reclassification of line fees from

net fee income to interest income, partly offset by

$239 million increase in provisions for estimated

customer refunds, payments, associated costs, and

litigation. Excluding the impact of these items, net

interest income was flat compared to 2018. Average

interest earning assets grew 3% primarily from

Australian and New Zealand housing, broadly offset

by a lower margin. Reported net interest margin

decreased 1 basis point to 2.12%.

• Net fee income decreased $769 million or

32% compared to 2018 primarily due to the

reclassification of line fees to net interest income

($667 million in 2018) and $126 million increase

in provisions for estimated customer refunds,

payments, associated costs and litigation.

• Net wealth management and insurance income

decreased $1,032 million or 50% compared to 2018

primarily due to additional provisions for estimated

customer refunds, payments, associated costs, and

litigation of $531 million, higher general insurance

claims from severe weather events $69 million,

cessation of grandfathered advice commissions $42

million, lower wealth management income due to

changes in platform pricing structure, and exit of the

Hastings business in 2018.

• Trading income decreased $16 million or 2%

compared to 2018. The decline mainly relates to

a change in methodology in derivative valuation

adjustments partially offset by higher non-customer

income.

• Other income is up $57 million or 79% compared

to 2018, primarily due to the non-repeat of a 2018

impairment charge on an equity holding of $104

million.

• Operating expenses increased $540 million or

6% compared to 2018. The increase was mainly

due to a $349 million increase in provisions for

estimated customer refunds, payments, associated

costs, and litigation, higher technology expenses

of $174 million, a rise in regulatory, compliance and

investment related spend of $170 million, partially

offset by the exit of the Hastings business in 2018 of

$158 million and a net productivity benefit.

• Impairment charges were $84 million or 12% higher

compared to 2018. Asset quality remained sound,

with stressed exposures as a percentage of total

committed exposures at 1.20%, up 12 basis points

over the year.

A review of the operations of the Group and its

divisions and their results for the financial year ended

30 September 2019 is set out in Section 2 of the Annual

Report under the sections ‘Review of Group operations’

(see pages 79 to 92), ‘Divisional performance’ (see

pages 93 to 101) and ‘Risk and risk management’ (see

pages 102 to 120), which form part of this report.

Further information about our financial position and

financial results is included in the financial statements in

Section 3 of this Annual Report (see pages 135 to 288),

which form part of this report.

c) Dividends

Since 30 September 2019, Westpac has announced

a final ordinary dividend of 80 cents per Westpac

ordinary share, totalling approximately $2,791 million

for the year ended 30 September 2019 (2018 final

ordinary dividend of 94 cents per Westpac ordinary

share, totalling $3,227 million). The dividend will be fully

franked and will be paid on 20 December 2019.

An interim ordinary dividend for the current financial

year of 94 cents per Westpac ordinary share for the half

year ended 31 March 2019, totalling $3,239 million, was

paid as a fully franked dividend on 24 June 2019 (2018

interim ordinary dividend of 94 cents per Westpac

ordinary share, totalling $3,213 million). The payment

comprised direct cash disbursements of $2,080 million

with $1,159 million being reinvested by participants

through the DRP.

Further, in respect of the year ended 30 September

2018, a fully franked final dividend of 94 cents per

ordinary share totalling $3,227 million was paid on 20

December 2018. The payment comprised direct cash

disbursements of $2,897 million with $330 million, being

reinvested by participants through the DRP.

New shares were issued under the DRP for each of

the 2018 final ordinary dividend and the 2019 interim

ordinary dividend.

362019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Directors’ report

d) Significant changes in state of affairs and events

during and since the end of the 2019 financial year

Throughout the financial year ended 30 September

2019, the Group has operated in a challenging external

environment, which has included ongoing and

heightened scrutiny across the industry (including as

a result of the Royal Commission into Misconduct in

the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services

Industry and self-assessments into governance, culture

and accountability), as well as challenging economic

conditions (refer to the section ‘External environment’

for more details).

In this environment, significant changes in the state of

affairs of the Group were:

• changes to Westpac’s wealth strategy, which

resulted in major BT Financial Group businesses

being realigned into the Consumer and Business

divisions and exiting the provision of personal

financial advice by Westpac Group salaried financial

advisers and authorised representatives;

• compliance, reputation and remediation provisions;

• APRA applying an additional $500 million to

Westpac’s operational risk capital requirement as a

result of Westpac’s self-assessment into its culture,

governance and accountability;

• the issuance of approximately A$1.42 billion AT1

securities, known as Westpac Capital Notes 6, which

qualify as Additional Tier 1 capital under APRA’s

capital adequacy framework, as well as the transfer

and redemption of approximately A$1.38 billion

Westpac Capital Notes; and

• ongoing regulatory changes and developments,

which have included changes relating to financial

services, the expansion of penalties for financial

sector misconduct, the provision of new powers

to regulators, accounting standards, access to

data, information security and other regulatory

requirements.

For a discussion of these matters, please refer to

‘Significant developments’ in Section 1 of the Annual

Report, which forms part of this report (see pages

15 to 22).

On 4 November 2019, Westpac announced that it will

be undertaking an underwritten placement of fully

paid ordinary shares in Westpac to sophisticated and

institutional investors to raise $2 billion. As further

announced, following the placement, Westpac will make

a share purchase plan available to eligible shareholders

and is targeting to raise approximately $500 million.

The proceeds received under the placement and share

purchase plan will be used to strengthen Westpac’s

regulatory capital position.

Other than set out above, the Directors are not aware

of any other matter or circumstance that has occurred

since 30 September 2019 that has significantly affected

or may significantly affect the operations of the Group,

the results of these operations or the state of affairs of

the Group in subsequent financial years.

e) Business strategies, developments and expected

results

Our business strategies, prospects and likely major

developments in the Group’s operations in future

financial years and the expected results of those

operations are discussed below and in ‘Significant

developments’ in Section 1 of the Annual Report

(see pages 15 to 22), which forms part of this report.

External environment

2019 has been another challenging period for financial

services companies, including Westpac. In particular,

the Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking,

Superannuation and Financial Services Industry,

combined with self-assessments into governance,

culture and accountability conducted across the

industry have brought to light examples of poor

behaviour affecting customers, shortcomings in the

management of non-financial risks, and weak risk

cultures. These have added to the erosion of public

sentiment and trust in the financial services industry.

Westpac has taken these developments very seriously

and is now working to respond to the findings of the

Royal Commission’s final report (released 1 February

2019) and its own CGA self-assessment. At the same

time, the Group has been focused on identifying where

we got it wrong for customers and putting things right.

These efforts aim to strengthen the Group’s focus on

leadership, governance and culture, and create better

outcomes for customers and shareholders.

These issues for Westpac, and the sector, have

been accompanied by a weakening in the economic

environment with lower GDP growth, continued weak

wages growth and subdued business and consumer

sentiment. At the same time, interest rates have fallen

to unprecedented lows. For financial services, this has

contributed to more cautious demand for lending,

a decline in deposit growth, lower house prices, and

structural pressures on net interest margins. While

credit growth has slowed, competition has remained

intense across the sector including from domestic and

international banks, and from non-banks.

Business Strategy

The changing environment in which we operate

has reinforced the need to deliver better customer

outcomes and experiences, and underlined the

importance of continuing to deliver on our vision and

strategy, including the Service Revolution.

Westpac’s vision is ‘To be one of the world’s great

service companies, helping our customers, communities

and people to prosper and grow’.

In delivering on our strategy, we are focused on our core

markets, including Australia and New Zealand, where

we provide a comprehensive range of financial products

and services that we believe assist us in meeting the

financial services needs of customers.

With over 14 million customers

1

, our focus is on organic

growth, growing customer numbers in our chosen

segments and building stronger and deeper customer

relationships.

1. All customers with an active relationship (excludes channel only and potential relationships) as at 30 September 2019.

372019 Westpac Group Annual Report
1

2

3

4

Directors’ report

A key element of this approach is our portfolio of

financial services brands, which we believe enables us

to appeal to a broader range of customers and provides

us with the flexibility to offer solutions that better meet

individual customer needs.

As we continue to build the business, the financial

services environment remains challenging and has

required us to maintain focus on our financial position.

This has involved:

• maintaining the high level and quality of our capital;

• continuing to improve our funding and liquidity

position; and

• seeking to maintain a high level of asset quality and

appropriate provisioning.

We continue to focus on ways to simplify our business

to make it easier for customers to do business with us

and to make work better for our people. We believe

these improvement efforts deliver better customer

outcomes while also creating capacity for investment.

Throughout 2019 we continued our focus on seeking

to deliver positive outcomes for our customers

and shareholders through our Service Revolution

transformation.

The Service Revolution is seeking to:

• provide a truly personal service for customers while

better anticipating their needs;

• put customers in control of their finances;

• respond to the increased pace of innovation,

disruption and changing customer behaviours

through digitisation and increasing our capacity for

innovation; and

• innovate and simplify to reinvent the customer

experience.

As part of our delivery of the Service Revolution, we

have developed an integrated, multi-year plan that will

be executed across the Group. In 2019, we continued to

deliver outcomes and milestones on a number of our

transformation programs focused on the digitisation

of the company through the design and development

of a single bank technology infrastructure. We expect

this will transform customer experiences and drive

operational efficiency. At the same time, we believe our

divisional transformation programs continue to deliver

market-leading customer services, while lowering the

cost to serve.

Over the year, substantial work has also continued on

conduct and culture, with work focused on continuing

to strengthen our conduct management across the

Group. Much of the effort this year has been focused

on improving customer outcomes and on our product

reviews, as well as working to ensure we meet customer

and community expectations. We are continuing to

make adjustments and improvements to our business.

In addition, work continues on ensuring that we are

responding to the changing regulatory and industry

landscape.

Sustainability is part of our strategy of seeking to

anticipate and shape the most pressing emerging social

issues where we have the skills and experience to make

a meaningful difference and drive business value. Our

approach makes sustainability part of the way we do

business, embedded in our strategy, values, culture and

processes.

Supporting our customer-focused strategy is a strong

set of company-wide values, which are embedded in

our culture. These are:

• integrity;

• service;

• one team;

• courage; and

• achievement.

In delivering our strategy, we have a set of strategic

priorities that help guide our activities:

Customer Franchise

• Deliver great customer outcomes;

• Create best-in-class service experience;

• Enable channels to work together seamlessly; and

• Maintain strong and differentiated brand portfolio.

Digital transformation

• Build out data infrastructure and capabilities;

• Transform our platforms;

• Strengthen partnerships to efficiently close

capability gaps; and

• Create new digital experiences for customers.

Performance discipline

• Uplift risk management capability;

• Get it right;

• Enhance execution proficiency; and

• Drive structural cost reduction.

Competition

The Group operates in a highly competitive

environment.

We serve the banking, wealth and risk management

needs of customer segments from consumers and

small businesses through to large corporate and

institutional clients. The Group competes with other

financial services providers in every segment and every

product or service. Our competitors include financial

services and advisory companies such as banks (both

domestic and global), investment banks, credit unions,

building societies, mortgage originators, credit card

issuers, brokerage firms, fund and asset management

companies, insurance companies, online financial

services providers, and technology companies large and

small.

Like other financial services providers, our competitive

position across customer segments, products and

geographies is determined by a variety of factors. These

include:

• the quality, range, innovation and pricing of products

and services offered;

• digital and technology solutions;

• customer service quality and convenience;

• the effectiveness of, and access to, distribution

channels;

• brand reputation and preference;

• the types of customers served; and

• the talent and experience of our employees.

382019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Directors’ report

We also operate in an environment where digital

innovation is changing the competitive landscape.

We compete on our ability to offer new products and

services that align to evolving customer preferences.

The competitive nature of the industry means that if

we are not successful in developing or introducing new

products and services, or in responding or adapting to

changes in customer preferences and habits, we could

lose customers to our competitors.

Competition within Australia’s financial system is

evidenced by both the significant number of providers

and the range of products and services available

to customers. In Australia, competition for both

deposits and lending continues to be fierce, both from

established banks as well as new entrants, including

technology firms. Slowing growth in some sectors has

heightened competitive intensity as financial institutions

work to win new customers and retain existing ones.

In our wealth businesses, we expect the broader

competitive landscape to continue to undergo

significant change with ongoing consolidation in life

insurance, increased overseas interest and participation

in superannuation.

In New Zealand, the Group is experiencing strong

competition as banks vie for new customers and seek

to retain existing ones. Competition for deposits and

lending remains intense.

Outlook

1


The Australian economy had a below-trend year with

annual growth to the June quarter 2019 at only 1.4%

which was below population growth of 1.6%.

Growth has been uneven as private spending

contracted over the year while government spending

and exports accounted for all of Australia’s growth.

Weakness in the private sector largely reflects a

contraction in building activity, particularly centred

around residential property, and continuing weakness

in wages which is constraining consumer spending. The

softer Australian growth combined with the slowdown

in the world economy is also impacting business

confidence and investment plans.

Progress in dealing with the shocks to the global

outlook from the trade disputes, particularly between

the US and China, will be important for the outlook for

the global economy and the flow-on effect on business

confidence and investment plans in Australia.

Looking ahead, the Group expects GDP growth to lift

somewhat through the remainder of 2019 and into

2020. This scenario is expected to be supported by

interest rate cuts, the lower Australian dollar, targeted

income tax cuts, and a recovery in housing sentiment.

Nevertheless, GDP growth is likely to remain below

longer term averages (of closer to 2.75%) at 2.3% for

calendar year 2019 and 2.4% for calendar year 2020.

Weakness in wage growth is likely to persist while the

contraction in the residential construction cycle will

extend well into 2020. The Group expects the recent

recovery in house prices, particularly in Sydney and

Melbourne, to extend into 2020, providing some boost

to households who, nevertheless, are likely to remain

cautious on further increasing debt levels.

With the Commonwealth budget expected to return

to surplus in 2019/20, the Commonwealth government

may initiate additional stimulus in 2020 to assist the

recovery as further stimulus from monetary policy

appears to be limited.

With the RBA cash rate having been reduced from 1.5%

to 0.75% over the course of 2019, one more rate cut is

expected in early 2020 to 0.5%. Following that move,

if further stimulus is required, the RBA may adopt

unconventional monetary policies which may include

asset purchases or long term funding for financial

institutions.

Credit growth for the Australian financial system slowed

to 2.7% in the year to September 2019, down from 4.5%

a year earlier. That included a slowdown in housing

credit to 3.1% from 5.4% and business to 3.3% from 3.8%

with personal credit contracting by 4.4% after declining

by 1% a year earlier.

For the year ending 30 September 2020, total system

credit growth is expected to lift to 3%, with housing

credit growth rising to 3.5%. The lift in housing credit

growth is expected to reflect the improving conditions

in major housing markets, particularly following

the more recent rise in lending approvals. Business

credit growth is likely to expand by 3% in the year to

30 September 2020 while other personal credit is

expected to contract by a further 2%.

Economic conditions in New Zealand have also softened

over the year; in part due to the deterioration in the

global back drop which has dampened conditions

in export sectors. Domestic New Zealand conditions

have also softened with sluggish consumer spending

and weak business confidence. Conditions in New

Zealand are likely to remain muted for the remainder

of 2019 followed by an expected improvement in 2020

supported by lower interest rates, some fiscal stimulus,

and the competitive (lower) New Zealand dollar.

The environment for financial services companies is

expected to continue to be impacted by the actions

flowing from the Royal Commission into Misconduct

in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services

Industry that released its final report in February 2019.

The sector will remain focused on implementing the

recommendations of the Royal Commission and other

company specific reviews. At the same time, regulators

have indicated that they will be taking a more active

position in prosecuting cases of misconduct as well

as stepping up supervisory actions. This will likely see

associated costs remain high for the sector in the period

ahead.

In addition, regulators in Australia and New Zealand

have a number of reviews underway, in many areas

including mortgage pricing, remuneration, and capital/

risk weighted asset methodologies across the sector.

Further clarity on these reviews is expected in the year

ahead.

1. All data and opinions under ‘Outlook’ are generated by our internal economists and management.

392019 Westpac Group Annual Report
1

2

3

4

Directors’ report

Westpac Group remains focused on executing our

vision of being one of the world’s great service

companies, with three strategic priorities assisting this

transformation. These are:

• Customer franchise - continuing to build the

Group’s customer base while also increasing the

depth of customer relationships. The Group seeks

to do this via superior service, as measured by NPS,

and by expanding our share of customers that call

us their main financial institution. The priority will

be supported by our strong portfolio of brands and

also recognises that leading in services requires a

high quality, diverse and engaged workforce;

• Digital transformation - utilising technology to

materially improve efficiency and reduce the

Group’s cost to income ratio to below 40% in the

medium term. This will include completing the

modernisation of the Group’s technology platforms,

and migrating more activity to digital that will

assist in the continued restructuring of the Group’s

distribution network and create new experiences for

customers. At the same time we’ve developed some

unique fintech partnerships that will provide new

services and close capability gaps; and

• Performance discipline – continuing to be prudent

in the management of capital, funding and liquidity;

managing returns effectively seeking to achieve a

superior ROE to the peer average and remaining

disciplined and targeted on asset growth. At the

same time the group is focused on improving

its ability to execute on its plans with a focus on

leadership.

In the period ahead, a key focus will be to resolve

outstanding issues, including our response to the

findings of the Royal Commission and our own CGA

self-assessment. At the same time we are looking to

enhance our processes and controls in areas such as

financial crime, end-to-end lending, compliance, and

risk management. As a result, investment across these

areas, is expected to lead to higher costs in 2020.

At the same time, we have already provided for

customer payments and refunds where we may not

have, or have not been able to sufficiently demonstrate

that we have, done the right thing for customers. Our

review of historical practices will continue into 2020

and further provisions may be required. We will also

focus on refunding customers as quickly as practical

where needed.

The low interest rate environment also has an impact

on bank earnings and should interest rates be reduced

further it is likely to place additional pressure on

earnings and returns, as the ability to fully reprice

lending and deposits to account for even lower interest

rates is limited.

Our lending growth is expected to be modest in the

year ahead, partly reflecting the low system growth

but also due to our decision to remain disciplined on

margins and from low mortgage growth. Mortgage

volume declined late in FY19 and are expected to ease

further in the early part of FY20. Growth should then

recover through the year as the resolution of some

process issues gradually sees new applications improve

and outflows slow.

Wealth management income is also expected to

be lower over the year, from our decisions to exit

financial planning, eliminate grandfathered commission

payments and change pricing on our wealth

administration platforms. The impact of regulatory

change may also reduce wealth and insurance income

in the year ahead.

On capital, our current capital raising will further

lift the Group’s CET1 capital ratio and, based on the

current outlook and our capital settings, the Group will

increase its buffer over APRA’s unquestionably strong

benchmark for CET1 capital ratio of over 10.5%.

Given the strength of our customer franchise, and

our balance sheet, we believe we are well placed to

respond to any changes in the operating environment

or regulatory requirements.

Looking ahead, with our strong positioning, disciplined

growth, solid portfolio of businesses, and good

progress on our strategic priorities, Westpac believes

it is well positioned to continue delivering sound

outcomes for shareholders and customers.

Further information on our business strategies

and prospects for future financial years and likely

developments in our operations and the expected

results of operations have not been included in this

report because the Directors believe it would be likely

to result in unreasonable prejudice to us.

f) Risks to our financial performance, position and

our operations

Our financial position, our future financial results,

our operations and the success of our strategy are

subject to a range of risks. These risks are set out and

discussed in Section 2 of this Annual Report under the

section ‘Risk and risk management’, which forms part of

this report (see pages 102 to 120).

402019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Directors’ report

4. Directors’ interests

a) Directors’ interests in securities

The following particulars for each Director are set out in the Remuneration Report in Section 10 of the Directors’

report for the year ended 30 September 2019 and in the tables below:

• their relevant interests in our shares or the shares of any of our related bodies corporate;

• their relevant interests in debentures of, or interests in, any registered managed investment scheme made

available by us or any of our related bodies corporate;

• their rights or options over shares in, debentures of, or interests in, any registered managed investment scheme

made available by us or any of our related bodies corporate; and

• any contracts:

–to which the Director is a party or under which they are entitled to a benefit; and

–that confer a right to call for or deliver shares in, debentures of, or interests in, any registered managed

investment scheme made available by us or any of our related bodies corporate.

Directors’ interests in Westpac and related bodies corporate as at 4 November 2019

Number of Relevant

Interests in Westpac

Ordinary Shares

Number of Westpac

Share Rights

Westpac Banking Corporation

Current Directors

Lindsay Maxsted23,602-

Brian Hartzer151,478

1

636,540

2

Nerida Caesar13,583-

Ewen Crouch78,450

3

-

Alison Deans14,392-

Craig Dunn8,869-

Anita Fung--

Steven Harker10,365

Peter Marriott20,870-

Peter Nash8,020-

Margaret Seale21,719

4

Former Directors

Peter Hawkins15,880

5

-

1. Brian Hartzer’s interest in Westpac ordinary shares includes 20,933 restricted shares held under the CEO Restricted Share Plan.

2. Share rights issued under the CEO Long Term Variable Plan.

3. Ewen Crouch and his related bodies corporate also hold relevant interests in 250 Westpac Capital Notes 2.

4. Margaret Seale and her related bodies corporate also hold relevant interests in 3,220 Westpac Capital Notes 2.

5. Figure displayed is as at Peter Hawkins’s retirement date of 12 December 2018, at which point Peter Hawkins and his related bodies

corporate also held relevant interests in 850 Capital Notes 3, 882 Westpac Capital Notes 4 and 1,370 Westpac Capital Notes 5.

Note: Certain subsidiaries of Westpac offer a range of registered schemes. The Directors from time to time invest in these schemes and are

required to provide a statement to the ASX when any of their interests in these schemes change. ASIC has exempted each Director from

the obligation to notify the ASX of a relevant interest in a security that is an interest in BT Cash Management Trust (ARSN 087 531 539),

BT Premium Cash Fund (ARSN 089 299 730), Westpac Cash Management Trust (ARSN 088 187 928) or Advance Cash Multi-Blend Fund

(ARSN 094 113 050).

412019 Westpac Group Annual Report
1

2

3

4

Directors’ report

b) Indemnities and insurance

Under the Westpac Constitution, unless prohibited

by statute, we indemnify each of the Directors and

Company Secretaries of Westpac and of each of

our related bodies corporate (except related bodies

corporate listed on a recognised stock exchange),

each employee of Westpac or our subsidiaries (except

subsidiaries listed on a recognised stock exchange),

and each person acting as a responsible manager

under an Australian Financial Services Licence of any

of Westpac’s wholly-owned subsidiaries against every

liability (other than a liability for legal costs) incurred by

each such person in their capacity as director, company

secretary, employee or responsible manager, as the

case may be; and all legal costs incurred in defending or

resisting (or otherwise in connection with) proceedings,

whether civil or criminal or of an administrative or

investigatory nature, in which the person becomes

involved because of that capacity.

Each of the Directors named in this Directors’ report

and each of the Company Secretaries of Westpac has

the benefit of this indemnity.

Consistent with shareholder approval at the 2000

Annual General Meeting, Westpac has entered into

a Deed of Access and Indemnity with each of the

Directors, which includes indemnification in identical

terms to that provided in the Westpac Constitution.

Westpac also executed a deed poll in September 2009

providing indemnification equivalent to that provided

under the Westpac Constitution to individuals acting as:

• statutory officers (other than as a director) of

Westpac;

• directors and other statutory officers of wholly-

owned subsidiaries of Westpac; and

• directors and statutory officers of other nominated

companies as approved by Westpac in accordance

with the terms of the deed poll and Westpac’s

Contractual Indemnity Policy.

Some employees of Westpac’s related bodies corporate

and responsible managers of Westpac and its related

bodies corporate are also currently covered by a deed

poll that was executed in November 2004, which is on

similar terms to the September 2009 deed poll.

The Westpac Constitution also permits us, to the extent

permitted by law, to pay or agree to pay premiums for

contracts insuring any person who is or has been a

Director or Company Secretary of Westpac or any of

its related bodies corporate against liability incurred by

that person in that capacity, including a liability for legal

costs, unless:

• we are forbidden by statute to pay or agree to pay

the premium; or

• the contract would, if we paid the premium, be

made void by statute.

Under the September 2009 deed poll, Westpac also

agrees to provide directors’ and officers’ liability

insurance to Directors of Westpac and Directors of

Westpac’s wholly-owned subsidiaries.

For the year ended 30 September 2019, the Group has

insurance cover which, in certain circumstances, will

provide reimbursement for amounts which we have to

pay under the indemnities set out above. That cover

is subject to the terms and conditions of the relevant

insurance, including but not limited to the limit of

indemnity provided by the insurance. The insurance

policies prohibit disclosure of the premium payable and

the nature of the liabilities covered.

c) Share rights outstanding

As at the date of this report there are 4,225,250 share

rights outstanding in relation to Westpac ordinary

shares. The latest dates for exercise of the share rights

range between 1 October 2020 and 1 July 2034.

Holders of outstanding share rights in relation to

Westpac ordinary shares do not have any rights under

the share rights to participate in any share issue or

interest of Westpac or any other body corporate.

d) Proceedings on behalf of Westpac

No application has been made and no proceedings

have been brought or intervened in, on behalf of

Westpac under section 237 of the Corporations Act.

422019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Directors’ report

5. Environmental disclosure

As part of our 2019 Sustainability Strategy, we have set

targets for our environmental performance to 2020.

The Westpac Group’s environmental framework starts

with ‘Our Principles for Doing Business’, which outline

our broad environmental principles. This framework

includes:

• our Westpac Group Environment Policy, which has

been in place since 1992;

• our Sustainability Risk Management Framework;

• our Climate Change Position Statement and 2020

Action Plan;

• our Responsible Sourcing Code of Conduct; and

• public reporting of our environmental performance.

We also participate in a number of voluntary initiatives

including the Dow Jones Sustainability Index (#9

in global banking group and above our Australian

peers), CDP

1

, the Equator Principles, the Principles for

Responsible Banking, the Principles for Responsible

Investment and the United Nations Global Compact.

The National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting Act

2007 (Cth) (NGER) came into effect in July 2008. The

Group reports on greenhouse gas emissions, energy

consumption and production under the NGER for the

period 1 July through 30 June each year.

Our operations are not subject to any other significant

environmental regulation under any law of the

Commonwealth of Australia or of any state or territory

of Australia. We may, however, become subject to

environmental regulation as a result of our lending

activities in the ordinary course of business and we

have policies in place to ensure that this potential risk is

addressed as part of our normal processes.

We have not incurred any liability (including for

rectification costs) under any environmental legislation.

Westpac has reported its performance against the

recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-

related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) in Section 2 of

this Annual Report under the sections titled ‘Risk and

risk management – climate change risk’ (see pages

118 to 120); and ‘Climate-related financial disclosures

(see page 127). Further information about Westpac’s

sustainability performance and approach is also

included in Section 2 of this Annual Report under

the sections ‘Risk and Risk Management’ (see pages

102 to 120) and ‘Westpac’s approach to sustainability’

(see pages 121 to 131).

Additional information about our environmental

performance, including information on our climate

change approach, details of our greenhouse gas

emissions profile and environmental footprint, and

progress against our environmental targets and carbon

neutral program are available on our website at

www.westpac.com.au/sustainability.

6. Human rights supply chain disclosure

Westpac’s overall approach to human rights is set out in

our Westpac Group Human Rights Position Statement,

and this references our Responsible Sourcing Code

of Conduct as the primary framework for managing

human rights in our supply chain.

The Group is subject to the United Kingdom’s

Transparency in Supply Chains provisions under the

Modern Slavery Act 2015, which came into effect in

March 2015. Westpac releases an annual statement

each year for the period ended 30 September to

disclose the steps taken during the year to help prevent

modern slavery from occurring within the Group’s

operations and supply chain.

The Group is subject to the Commonwealth of

Australia’s Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Cth), with the first

reporting year being 2020 and the first report being

due six months from the end of 30 September 2020.

7. Rounding of amounts

Westpac is an entity to which ASIC Corporations

Instrument 2016/191 dated 24 March 2016, relating

to the rounding of amounts in directors’ reports and

financial reports, applies. Pursuant to this Instrument,

amounts in this Directors’ report and the accompanying

financial report have been rounded to the nearest

million dollars, unless indicated to the contrary.

8. Political engagement

In line with Westpac policy, no cash donations were

made to political parties during the financial year ended

30 September 2019.

In Australia, political expenditure for the financial year

ended 30 September 2019 was $166,650. This relates

to payment for participation in legitimate political

activities where they were assessed to be of direct

business relevance to Westpac. Such activities include

business observer programs attached to annual party

conferences, policy dialogue forums and other political

functions, such as speeches and events with industry

participants.

In New Zealand, political expenditure for the financial

year ended 30 September 2019 was NZD$20,170.

1. Formerly known as the Carbon Disclosure Project.

432019 Westpac Group Annual Report
1

2

3

4

Directors’ report

9. Directors’ meetings

Each Director attended the following meetings of the Board and Committees of the Board during the financial year

ended 30 September 2019:

NotesBoard

Audit

Committee

Risk &

Compliance

Committee

Nominations

Committee

Remuneration

Committee

Technology

Committee

Number of meetings

held during the year

Director

ABABABABABAB

Lindsay Maxsted11111665544n/an/an/an/a

Brian Hartzer21111n/an/an/an/an/an/an/an/a44

Nerida Caesar31111n/an/a55n/an/an/an/a44

Ewen Crouch4111144554466n/an/a

Alison Deans51111n/an/a55446644

Craig Dunn61111n/an/a554466n/an/a

Anita Fung71111n/an/a55n/an/an/an/an/an/a

Steven Harker877n/an/a33n/an/an/an/an/an/a

Peter Hawkins9332211n/an/an/an/a11

Peter Marriott101111665544n/an/a44

Peter Nash1111116655n/an/an/an/an/an/a

Margaret Seale1277n/an/a33n/an/an/an/an/an/a

This table shows membership of standing Committees of the Board. From time to time the Board may form other

committees or request Directors to undertake specific extra duties.

A – Meetings eligible to attend as a member B – Meetings attended as a member

Unless otherwise stated, each Director has been a member, or the Chairman, of the relevant Committee for the

whole of the period from 1 October 2018.

1. Chairman of the Board Nominations Committee. Member of the Board Audit Committee and the Board Risk & Compliance Committee.

2. Member of the Board Technology Committee.

3. Member of the Board Risk & Compliance Committee and Board Technology Committee.

4. Chairman of the Board Risk & Compliance Committee. Member of the Board Nominations Committee and the Board Remuneration

Committee, and from 1 January 2019, a member of the Board Audit Committee.

5. Chairman of the Board Technology Committee. Member of the Board Nominations Committee, Board Remuneration Committee and

Board Risk & Compliance Committee.

6. Chairman of the Board Remuneration Committee. Member of the Board Risk & Compliance Committee and the Board Nominations

Committee.

7. Member of the Board Risk & Compliance Committee.

8. Steven Harker was appointed as a Director and member of the Board Risk & Compliance Committee on 1 March 2019.

9. Peter Hawkins retired from the Board and its Committees on 12 December 2018.

10. Chairman of the Board Audit Committee. Member of the Board Nominations Committee, Board Risk & Compliance Committee and the

Board Technology Committee.

11. Member of the Board Audit Committee and Board Risk & Compliance Committee.

12. Margaret Seale was appointed as a Director and member of the Board Risk & Compliance Committee on 1 March 2019.

442019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Directors’ report

Directors’ report

10. Remuneration Report

Introduction from the Chairman of the Board Remuneration Committee

2019 was

a year of reflection

for the Company

and the Board

Craig Dunn, Chairman

Board Remuneration Committee

Dear shareholders,

On behalf of the Board, I am pleased to present

Westpac’s 2019 Remuneration Report.

2019 Group performance

As outlined in the Chairman’s report and the CEO’s

annual letter, 2019 has been another challenging period

for financial services companies, including Westpac.

Examples of poor behaviour affecting customers,

shortcomings in the management of non-financial

risks and poor risk cultures have been at the heart of

challenges faced by the industry.

These issues have been accompanied by slowing

economic activity, further falls in interest rates,

a decline in house prices and weak business and

consumer confidence. These operating conditions have

contributed to more cautious demand for lending, a

decline in deposit growth and intense competition as

more lenders target a smaller pool of new lending.

With this backdrop, Westpac reported cash earnings of

$6,849 million in 2019, a reduction of 15% compared to

the prior year. Our performance in 2019 was impacted

by estimated customer refunds, payments, associated

costs, and litigation, as well as costs incurred with the

restructuring of the Wealth business. Excluding these

items, cash earnings in 2019 were $7,979 million, down

4% relative to 2018.

While earnings were lower, our common equity tier 1

ratio was 10.67% at 30 September 2019 and our liquidity

ratios were well above regulatory minimums. Asset

quality has remained sound and the overall level of

stressed assets remained at low levels over the year.

Recognising that much work has commenced on

improving our approach to non-financial risks, progress

in resolving risk and compliance matters has fallen short

of our expectations. Resolution of these matters and

continued investment in non-financial risk management

remain a focus.

Through the year we have continued to improve service

for customers, particularly via new digital self-serve

options and an enhanced approach to capturing

and responding to complaints. Investments in our

technology infrastructure have improved the stability

and speed of our systems and improved availability for

customers.

2019 remuneration outcomes

Westpac’s short term variable reward (STVR) is

designed to ensure a significant portion of remuneration

is variable, at-risk and linked to the delivery of agreed

plan targets for financial and non-financial measures.

The STVR outcome can range from 0% to 100%

depending on performance relative to targets agreed

at the beginning of the year, or exceed 100% when

exceptional performance is achieved.

The targets for STVR sign-post those areas of focus

that the Board regards as most critical for management

and which encourage the achievement of stretch

performance while operating within appropriate risk

settings. Long term variable reward (LTVR) is designed

to further align the interests of executives with those

of shareholders by rewarding the delivery of sustained

Group performance over the long term.

Key remuneration outcomes for 2019 include:

• The CEO’s STVR award was zero;

• The average 2019 STVR outcome for Group

Executives was 56% of the target opportunity, down

from 87% in 2018;

• The 2016 LTVR lapsed in full;

• The 2020 total target remuneration has been

reduced by 23% and 12.5% for the CEO and Group

Executives, respectively reflecting changes made to

LTVR; and

• Board fees were reduced by 20% as a one-off

measure.

Further detail regarding the key remuneration outcomes

for the CEO, Group Executives and Non-executive

Directors is provided on the following page, and in

sections 3, 6 and 7 of the Remuneration Report.

1
2

3

4

452019 Westpac Group Annual Report

Directors’ report

Chief

Executive

Officer

• The CEO recommended to the Board that he forego his STVR for this year. The Board separately

considered the matter and determined that a zero STVR outcome for 2019 for the CEO was

appropriate to reflect accountability for poor non-financial risk and financial outcomes, as well as

some poor customer outcomes, including those highlighted at the Royal Commission.

• The 2016 LTVR lapsed in full because the relative TSR and cash EPS performance hurdles were not

achieved. The CEO has not received a share-based payment under the LTVR for four consecutive

years, equating to $15.96 million worth of lapsed performance share rights over that period. This

result is aligned with shareholder outcomes over the period.

• In 2019, the CEO received $2.69 million in fixed remuneration and $1.33 million in deferred STVR

awarded in prior years that vested during the year, equalling $4.02 million in total realised

remuneration (i.e. take-home pay). This outcome is 33% of the maximum remuneration he could

have received for the year.

• For 2020, the CEO’s total target remuneration (comprising fixed remuneration, target STVR and

LTVR opportunity at face value) has been reduced by 23% as a result of changes made to LTVR,

as outlined below.

• The CEO has not received a total target remuneration increase since his appointment in 2015.

Group

Executives

• Group Executives received between 0% and 83% of their 2019 STVR target opportunity. The average

2019 STVR outcome for Group Executives was 56% of the target opportunity, down from 87% in 2018.

• The 2019 STVR scorecard outcome for non-financial risk measures was reduced to zero for Group

Executives. In addition, downward remuneration adjustments were applied to two Group Executives

and two former Group Executives in response to material risk and compliance matters that impacted

the Group, in some instances reducing 2019 STVR outcomes to zero. Many of these adjustments

related to events from prior periods which have continued to develop and, in some cases, for which

material remediation costs were accounted for in 2019.

• The Board exercised its discretion to apply downward adjustments to a portion of deferred STVR

awarded in prior years for two former Group Executives.

• The 2016 LTVR lapsed in full because the relative TSR and cash EPS performance hurdles were

not achieved.

• For 2020, the total target remuneration for Group Executives has been reduced by 12.5%, as a result

of changes made to LTVR.

• Given the above remuneration adjustments to current year and deferred STVR, together with changes

made to the LTVR from 2020, the Board determined that further adjustments to the quantum of

2020 LTVR were not required.

• David McLean (Chief Executive Officer, Westpac New Zealand) and Gary Thursby (Chief Operating

Officer) received total target remuneration increases in 2019 of 10.3% and 10.4% respectively to align

their remuneration with the market. David Lindberg received a total target remuneration increase

in 2019 of 6% given the increased size and scale of his role on appointment as the Group Executive,

Consumer. No other Group Executives received total target remuneration increases during 2019.

• David Stephen (Chief Risk Officer) and Craig Bright (Chief Information Officer) were appointed as

Group Executives in 2019. To attract the best international talent, the Board approved remuneration

packages which are higher than those of their predecessors. The Board also approved buyout awards

to compensate these executives for awards forfeited on resignation from their previous employer.

Non-

executive

Directors

• The Chairman and other Non-executive Director base fees for 2019 were reduced by 20% as a one-

off measure, which equated to a $162,000 reduction for the Chairman. The reduction was applied

to all current Non-executive Directors in recognition of our collective accountability as the Board

of Westpac for customer outcomes highlighted by the Royal Commission, shareholder sentiment

leading to the first strike at the 2018 Annual General Meeting and significant non-financial risk

matters.

All

employees

• The 2019 Group variable reward pool for all employees was reduced by $126 million from 2018 to

align with Group performance.

• In addition to the remuneration adjustments for Group Executives, downward remuneration

adjustments were approved for 13 General Managers in response to material risk and compliance

matters impacting the Group, ranging from 10% to 100%.

• The Group managed 1,134 employee conduct matters in Australia in 2019, of which 163 employees

exited the business and 545 employees were subject to formal disciplinary outcomes. A range of

remuneration consequences were also applied for these matters, including ineligibility for STVR and

remuneration adjustments to STVR.

462019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Directors’ report

First strike

Westpac received a first strike at the 2018 Annual

General Meeting, with 64% of votes cast against the

adoption of the 2018 Remuneration Report. This was a

disappointing outcome.

In 2019, we significantly increased our engagement

across different shareholder and shareholder advisory

groups to better understand their concerns. In addition

to ongoing meetings with shareholder advisory groups

and feedback from shareholders in the normal course,

we had individual and group meetings with many of our

institutional shareholders and roundtable meetings with

representative retail shareholders co-facilitated with the

Australian Shareholders’ Association.

It is clear that our executive remuneration outcomes

in 2018 were not in line with shareholder expectations.

Based on the feedback from the 2018 Annual General

Meeting and our more extensive consultations, the key

concerns that led to the first strike included:

(1) 2018 STVR outcomes were not considered

reflective of performance. Shareholders felt that

the scorecard results did not reflect performance in

some areas, in particular non-financial risk, and the

Board did not apply enough downward discretion to

the outcomes.

(2) Remuneration was considered too high,

particularly for the CEO. LTVR granted to the CEO

and Group Executives in 2018 was viewed as high

relative to that of peers, which was partially driven

by the use of fair value to determine the number of

performance share rights to grant for LTVR.

(3) There was insufficient transparency in our

communication with shareholders. Shareholders

believed that further information was required to

explain how STVR outcomes were determined.

The Board and management value these insights and

appreciate your feedback and willingness to engage

constructively.

Changes to remuneration

We spent significant time in 2019 reflecting on your

feedback.

We completed a comprehensive review of executive

remuneration including the remuneration strategy,

frameworks, governance, decision-making processes,

and our approach to communication.

A key objective of our review was to identify

opportunities for improvement and to develop

balanced solutions that consider the expectations of

shareholders, shareholder advisory groups, regulators,

customers and the broader community.

As a result, we have:

• Changed the LTVR allocation approach from 2020.

The number of performance share rights granted to

executives is now determined by the face value of

shares at the grant date, instead of the fair value. We

believe this approach improves transparency and is

in line with changes in market practice.

• Reduced total target and maximum remuneration

for executives from 2020. The Board reduced the

face value of 2020 LTVR opportunities by 43% for

the CEO and 23% to 25% for Group Executives. As

a result, the 2020 total target remuneration has

been reduced by 23% for the CEO and 12.5% for

Group Executives. This means the CEO’s total target

remuneration becomes comparable to that of other

Australian major bank CEOs.

Fixed remuneration

STVR

LTVR (face value)

CEO target remuneration package ($'000)

$2,686

$2,686

$2,686

$2,686

$6,320

$3,585

FY19

FY20

• Reduced fees paid to Non-executive Directors

for 2019. The Chairman and other current

Non-executive Director base fees for 2019 were

reduced by 20% as a one-off measure to recognise

collective accountability as the Board of Westpac

for customer outcomes highlighted by the Royal

Commission, shareholder sentiment leading to the

first strike at the 2018 Annual General Meeting and

significant non-financial risk matters.

• Updated the CEO’s 2019 STVR scorecard.

The balanced scorecard was updated to place a

greater emphasis on non-financial risk management

and customer outcomes.

• Improved our remuneration governance and

decision-making frameworks. We further improved

our approach to the assessment of material risk and

compliance matters and the flow of information

between Board Committees including to support

the Board in determining possible remuneration

adjustments.

• Enhanced our remuneration adjustment guidelines

to strengthen consequence management.

The guidelines build on existing policies and

practices to provide greater clarity and consistency

in the management of employee conduct and the

application of remuneration consequences.

• Introduced clawback as an additional

remuneration adjustment tool. Clawback has been

introduced to enable the Board to recover deferred

variable remuneration after it has vested (to the

extent legally permissible) in circumstances such

as serious misconduct or other conduct that may

have a serious adverse impact on Westpac or its

reputation, customers or people which has resulted

in, or would justify, termination of employment or

where otherwise required by law. Clawback will

apply to variable remuneration awarded in respect

of performance periods commencing on or after

1 October 2019 where conduct warranting clawback

occurs after this date.

• Improved disclosure in the Remuneration Report.

The Remuneration Report provides greater

transparency around the rationale for remuneration

decisions, seeks to clearly demonstrate the link

between performance and remuneration and

provides further detail in relation to Westpac’s

minimum shareholding requirement in section 5.

1
2

3

4

472019 Westpac Group Annual Report

Directors’ report

Other changes for 2020

In addition, the Board has selected relative TSR as

the performance hurdle for the 2020 LTVR plan

as it believes this measure best aligns executive

remuneration outcomes with long-term shareholder

value creation. In recent years, cash ROE has been

used as a LTVR performance hurdle in conjunction

with relative TSR. The Board considers that setting

an absolute cash ROE range over a three year period

has become increasingly difficult in light of current

uncertainties surrounding future regulatory capital

requirements and interest rates, which are at historically

low levels. The Board will review the 2021 LTVR

plan following the release of APRA’s final regulatory

framework for remuneration.

Regulatory developments

APRA is currently consulting on changes to the

regulatory framework for remuneration. The Board

recently provided a submission to APRA on the

proposed changes which sets out Westpac’s overall

support for a stronger, clearer and more consistent

set of requirements. Our submission also recommends

alternatives for consideration by the regulator in relation

to some material aspects of the draft changes, including

in relation to the proposed maximum weighting of

financial performance measures used to determine

variable remuneration. If enacted, some of the proposed

changes would require substantial amendment to

our remuneration arrangements for executives and

employees. The Board will continue to review the

remuneration design in 2020 following the release of

APRA’s final regulatory framework.

On behalf of the Board, I invite you to read our

Remuneration Report and welcome your feedback.

Craig Dunn, Chairman

Board Remuneration Committee

482019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Directors’ report

In this Report

1. Key Management Personnel 49

2. Summary of the 2019 executive reward framework 50

3. 2019 remuneration outcomes and alignment to performance 52

4. Further detail on the executive variable reward structure 59

5. Remuneration governance 62

6. Non-executive Director remuneration 64

7. Statutory remuneration details 66

1
2

3

4

492019 Westpac Group Annual Report

Directors’ report

1. David Lindberg was the Chief Executive, Business Bank until 1 April 2019 when he was appointed as the Chief Executive, Consumer.

2. Gary Thursby’s role and title changed from Group Executive, Strategy & Enterprise Services to Chief Operating Officer on 1 April 2019.

3. Alastair Welsh was the General Manager, Commercial Banking until 1 April 2019 when he was appointed as the Acting Chief Executive,

Business.

1. Key Management Personnel

The remuneration of Key Management Personnel (KMP) for the Group is disclosed in the Report. In 2019, KMP

comprised the CEO, Group Executives and Non-executive Directors as set out in the table below. KMP is defined as

those persons having authority and responsibility for planning, directing and controlling the activities of an entity,

directly or indirectly, including any director (whether executive or otherwise) of that entity.

NamePositionTerm as KMP

Managing Director & Chief Executive Officer

Brian HartzerManaging Director & Chief Executive OfficerFull Year

Current Group Executives

Craig BrightChief Information OfficerCommenced in KMP role on 4 December 2018

Lyn CobleyChief Executive, Westpac Institutional BankFull Year

Peter KingChief Financial OfficerFull Year

Rebecca LimGroup Executive, Legal & SecretariatFull Year

David Lindberg

1

Chief Executive, ConsumerFull Year

Carolyn McCannGroup Executive, Customer & Corporate RelationsFull Year

David McLeanChief Executive Officer, Westpac New ZealandFull Year

Christine ParkerGroup Executive, Human ResourcesFull Year

David StephenChief Risk OfficerFull Year

Gary Thursby

2

Chief Operating OfficerFull Year

Alastair Welsh

3

Acting Chief Executive, BusinessCommenced in KMP role on 1 April 2019

Former Group Executives

Brad CooperChief Executive Officer, BT Financial GroupCeased in KMP role on 1 April 2019

Dave CurranChief Information OfficerCeased in KMP role on 4 December 2018

George FrazisChief Executive, Consumer BankCeased in KMP role on 1 April 2019

Current Non-executive Directors

Lindsay Maxsted ChairmanFull Year

Nerida CaesarDirectorFull Year

Ewen CrouchDirectorFull Year

Alison DeansDirectorFull Year

Craig DunnDirector Full Year

Anita Fung DirectorFull Year

Steven HarkerDirectorCommenced in KMP role on 1 March 2019

Peter MarriottDirectorFull Year

Peter NashDirectorFull Year

Margaret SealeDirectorCommenced in KMP role on 1 March 2019

Former Non-executive Director

Peter HawkinsDirectorRetired on 12 December 2018 following the

completion of the 2018 Annual General Meeting

502019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Directors’ report

2. Summary of the 2019 executive reward framework

The delivery of our vision and strategy is supported by our remuneration strategy, principles and frameworks.

Westpac’s vision and strategy

Westpac’s vision is to be one of the world’s great service companies, helping our customers, communities and people to

prosper and grow. Our strategy seeks to deliver on our vision by building deep and enduring customer relationships, being a

leader in the community, being a place where the best people want to work and, in so doing, delivering sustainable returns for

shareholders.

Remuneration strategy

Westpac’s remuneration strategy is designed to attract and retain talented employees by rewarding them for achieving high

performance and delivering superior long-term results for our customers and shareholders, while adhering to sound risk

management and governance principles.

Remuneration principles

The remuneration strategy is underpinned by the following principles:

• Align remuneration with customer and shareholder interests.

• Support an appropriate risk culture and employee conduct.

• Differentiate pay for behaviour and performance in line with our vision and strategy.

• Provide market competitive and fair remuneration.

• Enable recruitment and retention of talented employees.

• Provide the ability to risk-adjust remuneration.

• Be simple, flexible and transparent.

Executive reward components

Fixed remunerationSTVRLTVR

Purpose

Attract and retain high quality executives

through market competitive and fair

remuneration.

Ensure a portion of remuneration is

variable, at-risk and linked to the delivery

of agreed plan targets for financial and

non-financial measures that support

Westpac’s strategic priorities. The STVR

outcome can range from 0% to 100% of

target depending on performance relative

to targets agreed at the beginning of the

year, or exceed 100% (up to a maximum

of 150% of target) when exceptional

performance is achieved.

Align executive accountability and

remuneration with the long-term interests

of shareholders by rewarding the delivery

of sustained Group performance over the

long-term.

Delivery

Comprises cash salary, salary sacrificed

items and superannuation contributions.

Awarded in cash (50%) and restricted

shares

1

(50%) based on an assessment

of performance over the preceding year.

Restricted shares vest in equal portions

after one and two years following

grant subject to continued service and

adjustment.

Awarded in performance share rights

which vest after four years subject to the

achievement of relative TSR and cash ROE

performance hurdles, continued service and

adjustment.

Alignment to performance

Set with reference to market benchmarks

in the financial services industry in

Australia and globally as well as the size,

responsibilities and complexity of the

role, and the skills and experience of the

executive.

Individual performance impacts fixed

remuneration adjustments.

Performance is assessed using a balanced

scorecard comprising:

• financial and non-financial measures

linked to Westpac’s key strategic

priorities; and

• a modifier to support the adjustment of

the outcome, upwards or downwards

(including to zero), for behaviour,

risk and reputation matters, people

management matters, and any other

matters as determined by the Board.

Performance is assessed against:

• Relative TSR

2

(50%) which is a

comparative measure of Westpac’s

performance relative to peers (measured

over four years); and

• Cash ROE

3

(50%) which aims to reward

the achievement of returns above

the cost of capital while generating

shareholder value (measured over a

three year period with an additional one

year holding lock).

Alignment to shareholders

Minimum shareholding requirements

equivalent to five times annual fixed

remuneration excluding superannuation

for the CEO and $1.2 million for Group

Executives. These requirements must be

satisfied within five years of appointment

as the CEO or as a Group Executive.

Half of the STVR award is deferred into

equity for a period of up to two years to

support alignment with shareholders over

the medium term.

The LTVR is fully delivered in equity and the

relative TSR and cash ROE performance

hurdles are aligned to long-term

shareholder returns and value creation.

1. The Group Executive outside Australia receives deferred STVR as unhurdled share rights.

2. For the 2020 LTVR plan, the performance hurdle will be relative TSR.

3. Cash ROE is return on equity on a cash earnings basis. Cash earnings are not prepared in accordance with AAS and have not been

subject to audit. Refer to Note 2 to the Financial Statements for a description of cash earnings.

1
2

3

4

512019 Westpac Group Annual Report

Directors’ report

2.1. Risk

Westpac’s remuneration arrangements are designed and managed to support effective risk management, the

generation of appropriate risk-based returns and the risk profile associated with our businesses which incorporate

products with varying complexity and maturity profiles.

• Remuneration outcomes: The performance of the Group and each division is reviewed and measured with

reference to how risk is managed in line with Westpac’s Risk Appetite Statement and the results of this

review and measurement influence remuneration outcomes. The key risks that are considered include capital,

credit, market, equity, liquidity, insurance, risk culture, reputation and sustainability, conduct, operational

and compliance risk and financial crime. In addition, STVR outcomes are influenced by relevant risk-related

matters through the Board’s application of the scorecard modifier, which is partly informed by individual risk

assessments for the CEO and each Group Executive.

• Variable reward pool: Each year, the Board determines the size of the variable reward pool which funds

outcomes across the Group. This is based on the Group’s performance for the year and an assessment of how

profit should be shared between shareholders and employees while retaining sufficient capital for growth. The

Group variable reward pool reflects financial performance including financial risk outcomes. A broad range

of financial and non-financial risk measures and customer outcomes may also be taken into account when

allocating the Group variable reward pool.

• Mandatory risk and compliance requirements: Individuals are only eligible to receive a fixed remuneration

adjustment, STVR and LTVR where an individual has satisfied minimum requirement gates which require that

behaviours are in line with Westpac’s Values and Code of Conduct and that the individual has met the risk and

compliance requirements for their role and business.

• Remuneration adjustments for prior period matters: The Board may adjust all forms of unvested deferred

variable reward downward, including to zero, for matters arising in a prior period if circumstances or information

come to light which mean that in the Board’s view all or part of the award was not appropriate. Having decided

that a downward adjustment is appropriate and determined the amount of any adjustment, typically the Board

will first apply that adjustment against the STVR for the current performance period. In instances where an

adjustment to current year STVR is insufficient or unavailable, the Board may apply the adjustment to unvested

deferred variable reward. Clawback provides an additional mechanism to recover vested deferred variable

reward in certain limited circumstances for awards made in respect of performance periods commencing on

or after 1 October 2019. It is the Board’s current intention that clawback will only be considered for relevant

conduct that occurred on or after 1 October 2019.

2.2. 2019 remuneration mix

1

34% Fix ed

remunerati on

17% STVR

(cash component)

17% STVR

(deferred

component)

32% LTVR

Chief Executive Officer and Group Executives

(excluding control function Group Executives)


40% Fix ed

remunerati on

15% STVR

(cash component)

15% STVR

(deferred

component)

30% LTVR

Control fu ncti on G roup Executives²

1. Based on a fair value methodology for LTVR.

2. Includes the Chief Risk Officer, the Group Executive, Legal & Secretariat, the Group Executive, Customer & Corporate Relations and the

Chief Financial Officer.

2.3. Timeline of potential remuneration

+ 1 y ear holding lock

20202021202220232019

Date eli gible for vesting

Date granted

Date paid

Cash STVR award (50%)

Fixed remuneration

LTVR award s ubject to cash ROE performance (50%) – measured o ver 3 y ears

LTVR award s ubject to r elati ve T SR performance ( 50%) – measure d o ver 4 years

Deferred STVR award (25%)

Deferred STVR award (25%)

522019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Directors’ report

3. 2019 remuneration outcomes and alignment to performance

3.1. Snapshot of 2019 remuneration outcomes

Short

term

variable

reward

The assessment of performance against the CEO’s 2019 scorecard focus areas resulted in an outcome

of 60% of target (40% of maximum) reflecting Group performance. This includes a zero outcome for

non-financial risk measures in the scorecard.

Notwithstanding this assessment, the CEO recommended to the Board that he forego his STVR for this

year. The Board separately considered the matter and determined that a zero STVR outcome for 2019

was appropriate to reflect accountability for poor non-financial risk and financial outcomes, as well

as some poor customer outcomes, including those highlighted at the Royal Commission. The Board

adjusted the CEO’s STVR award through the modifier, as outlined in section 3.5.

Westpac’s strategic priorities are cascaded from the CEO to Group Executives in combination with

other relevant divisional or functional measures. STVR outcomes for Group Executives ranged from 0%

to 83% of their 2019 STVR target opportunity.

The 2019 scorecard outcome for non-financial risk measures was also reduced to zero for Group

Executives. In addition, downward remuneration adjustments were applied to two Group Executives

and two former Group Executives in response to material risk and compliance matters impacting the

Group, in some instances reducing 2019 STVR outcomes to zero.

50% of the 2019 STVR awards remain subject to continued service and adjustment over a two year

period.

In addition, the Board exercised its discretion to apply downward adjustments to a portion of deferred

STVR awarded in prior years for two former Group Executives.

Long

term

variable

reward

The relative TSR and cash EPS

1

performance hurdles for the 2016 LTVR were not met and therefore

no LTVR vested during 2019. The Board considered that this outcome was appropriate given the

Group’s performance over the relevant period. This is the fourth consecutive year where LTVR has

not vested.

The table below shows the vesting outcome for the 2016 LTVR award to the CEO and Group

Executives that reached the end of its performance period in 2019.

Performance range

Performance

hurdle

Performance

start dateTest dateThresholdMaximumOutcome % Vested% Lapsed

TSR

50% of

award

1-Oct-151-Oct-19

Equal to

composite

TSR index

Exceeds

composite

TSR index by

21.55 (i.e. 5%

CAGR

2

)

Westpac:

14.508

Index:

17.549

0100

EPS

50% of

award

1-Oct-151-Oct-18

3

4.0% CAGR6.0% CAGR(1.6%) CAGR0100

1. Cash EPS is cash earnings per share. Cash earnings are not prepared in accordance with AAS and have not been subject to audit. Refer

to Note 2 to the Financial Statements for a description of cash earnings.

2. Compound annual growth rate.

3. The cash EPS hurdled performance share rights reached the end of their performance period on 30 September 2018 and were subject

to an additional one year holding lock through to 30 September 2019.

3.2. Group performance

The table below summarises the key performance indicators for the Group and variable reward outcomes over the

last five years.

Years ended 30 September

20192018201720162015

CEO STVR award (% of target)0%77.50%111%97%108%

Average Group Executive STVR (% of target)56%87%109%95%106%

LTVR award (% vested)0%0%0%0%36%

Cash earnings

1

($m) 6,849 8,0658,0627,8227,820

Statutory earnings ($m) 6,784 8,0957,9907,4458,012

Economic profit

2

($m)1,6193,4443,7743,7744,418

Cash ROE10.75%13.00%13.77%13.99%15.84%

TSR – three years15.33%8.27%11.79%15.24%62.30%

TSR – five years14.58%25.67%81.32%100.72%92.78%

Dividends per Westpac share (cents)174188188188187

Cash earnings per Westpac share$1.98$2.36$2.40$2.35$2.48

Share price – high$30.05$33.68$35.39$33.74$40.07

Share price – low$23.30$27.24$28.92$27.57$29.10

Share price – close$29.64$27.93$31.92$29.51$29.70

1. Cash earnings are not prepared in accordance with AAS and have not been subject to audit. Refer to Note 2 to the Financial Statements

for a description of cash earnings.

2. Economic profit is derived from cash earnings.

1
2

3

4

532019 Westpac Group Annual Report

Directors’ report

Return on equity and LTVR vesting (2015 to 2019)

10%

0%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

100%

90%

80%

5%

6%

7%

8%

9%

10%

11%

12%

13%

14%

15%

16%

17%

LTVR award

Return on equity (%)

2015

Return on equity (%)LTVR award (% vested)

2016201720182019

Total shareholder return (from 1 October 2014)

(30)

(20)

(10)

0

10

20

30

Total shareholder return (%)

Oct 14Oct 15Oct 16Oct 17Oct 18Oct 19

Peer 1Peer 2Peer 3Westpac

Cash earnings and CEO STVR award (2015 to 2019)

15%

0%

30%

45%

60%

75%

100%

150%

6,000

6,300

6,600

6,900

7,200

7,800

7,500

8,100

STVR award for the CEO

Cash earnings ($m)

2015

Cash earnings ($m)

STVR award for the CEO (% of target)

2016201720182019

0
0

2,000

1,000

4,000

2,000

6,000

3,000

8,00010,00012,000

5,0004,000

2019 Total Remuneration

2019 Total Remuneration

Craig Bright

2

Chief

Information

Ocer

1,0082019381

Lyn Cobley

Chief Executive,

Westpac

Institutional Bank

1,122

1,1222019

2018

582339

494466

Peter King

Chief Financial

Ocer

1,288517506

1,2883276012019

2018

Rebecca Lim

Group Executive,

Legal & Secretariat

950

950

263

287357

2019

2018

409

David Lindberg

Chief Executive,

Consumer

1,124

1,088

2019

2018

516516

440441

125

Brian Hartzer

Managing Director

& Chief Executive

Ocer

2,686

2019

2018

1,0411,218

1,329

2,686

Realised: 4,015

Foregone (max): 8,096

Realised: 1,389

Foregone (max): 308

Realised: 1,765

Foregone (max): 2,759

Realised: 2,043

Foregone (max): 3,211

Realised: 2,216

Foregone (max): 2,954

Realised: 1,622

Foregone (max): 805

Managing Director & Chief Executive Officer

Current Group Executives

542019 Westpac Group Annual Report

Directors’ report

1. Equity that vested on 1 October 2019 is included in the 2019 figures. Equity that vested on 1 October 2018 is included in the 2018 figures.

2. The information relates to the period the individual was a KMP. Refer to section 1 for further details.

Fixed remunerationCash STVR payment

Vesting of prior year LTVR awards

Vesting of prior year deferred STVR awards

2019 maximum realisable remuneration

3.3. Total realised remuneration – Chief Executive Officer and Group Executives (unaudited)

The charts below summarise the actual remuneration paid and the equity vested

1

to the CEO and Group Executives

relative to the maximum remuneration that could have been received in 2019 and 2018, including:

• fixed remuneration earned during the year;

• cash STVR awarded in respect of the year;

• deferred STVR awarded in prior years that vested during the year; and

• LTVR awarded in prior years that vested during the year.

The charts below also reference the maximum value of remuneration foregone in 2019, including cash STVR not

awarded in respect of the year (based on the maximum STVR opportunity) and deferred STVR and LTVR awarded

in prior years that was forfeited, adjusted or lapsed during the year.

The value of deferred STVR and LTVR is based on the number of restricted shares or share rights multiplied by the

five day volume weighted average share price (VWAP) up to and including the date of vesting. The value of equity

differs from the disclosure in section 7.

Total realised remuneration ($’000)

01,0002,0003,0005,0004,0002019 Total Remuneration
Carolyn McCann

Group Executive,

Customer &

Corporate Relations

195

202

213

2019

2018

740260

75

David McLean

Chief Executive O cer,

Westpac New Zealand

1,029

901

2019

2018

538427

370498

Christine Parker

Group Executive,

Human Resources

884

884

2019

2018

501315

422428

David Stephen

Chief Risk

O cer

2019

1,800466

Gary Thursby

Chief Operating

O cer

900

840

2019

2018

467315

369396

Alastair Welsh

2

Acting Chief

Executive,

Business

2019

135

402

Brad Cooper

2

Chief Executive O cer,

BT Financial Group

553

1,103

2019

2018

615

666400

Dave Curran

2

Chief Information

O cer

190

1,054

2019

2018

571

485445

George Frazis

2

Chief Executive,

Consumer Bank

577

1,150

2019

2018

701

735480

Realised: 1,195

Foregone (max): 703

Realised: 1,994

Foregone (max): 2,275

Realised: 1,700

Foregone (max): 2,165

Realised: 2,266

Foregone (max): 547

Realised: 1,682

Foregone (max): 1,082

Realised: 537

Foregone (max): 165

Realised: 1,168

Foregone (max): 3,127

Realised: 761

Foregone (max): 2,156

Realised: 1,278

Foregone (max): 3,006

Former Group Executives

1

2

3

4

552019 Westpac Group Annual Report

Directors’ report

3.4. Other payments made and equity vested during 2019

Craig Bright had 39,827 restricted shares granted under the Restricted Share Plan which vested in August 2019.

David Stephen had 15,727 restricted shares granted under the Restricted Share Plan which vested in March 2019.

The restricted shares were allocated in respect of equity forfeited from their previous employers on joining Westpac.

In addition, Craig Bright received a one-off cash payment of $1,050,000 in lieu of variable reward forfeited from his

previous employer on joining Westpac.

w
562019 Westpac Group Annual Report

Directors’ report

3.5. 2019 CEO and Group Executive short term variable reward outcomes

2019 CEO short term variable reward scorecard

The graphic below illustrates the CEO’s 2019 scorecard outcomes reflecting Group and individual performance.

Group financial performance (40%)

Primary measures of performance include cash earnings and cash ROE against plan,

having regard to cost and margin outcomes.

• Cash earnings were $6,849 million, down $1,216 million (or 15%) compared to 2018

and 81% of the target of $8,411 million, resulting in a zero outcome for the cash

earnings score. Group financial performance was negatively impacted by increased

lending and deposit competition, economy wide slowing of credit growth and

higher regulatory and compliance costs.

• Cash earnings were also impacted by provisions for estimated customer refunds,

payments, associated costs, and litigation, as well as costs associated with

the restructuring of the Wealth business. Excluding the impact of these items,

Westpac’s cash earnings were $7,979 million, down $367 million (or 4%) compared

to 2018.

• Impairment charges were slightly lower as asset quality remained sound. Excluding

the items outlined above, expenses were a little lower, down $16m on 2018, and

margin compression was limited to 4bps with the Group margin (excluding

Treasury & Markets) of 2.08%, resulting in a positive outcome for this focus area of

the scorecard.

• Delivered cash ROE of 10.75%, which is down from 13.00% in 2018 and lower than

the 13.15% target, resulting in a zero outcome for the cash ROE score.

[Non-financial]

0%100%150%

21% of target

Weighted outcome:

8% of target (6% of maximum)

Risk management (15%)

Financial risk management:

Performance measurement is based on operating performance relative to Westpac’s

Risk Appetite Statement as measured by Capital, Funding and Liquidity Management

and Credit Quality.

• Our common equity tier 1 ratio was 10.67%, Net Stable Funding Ratio was 112% and

the Liquidity Coverage Ratio was 127%.

• Maintained sound credit quality across the portfolio, with ratio of stressed assets

to total committed exposures at 1.20%.

Financial

0%100%150%

0%100%150%

87% of target

Non-financial risk management:

Performance measurement is based on operating performance relative to Westpac’s

Risk Appetite Statement, improvements to the control environment and audit and

compliance issue resolution.

• Increased investment to improve non-financial risk management capability over

the year including through targeted hiring in critical roles.

• Notwithstanding this improvement, progress in resolving risk and compliance

matters fell short of our expectations.

• Ongoing significant focus on resolving and remediating compliance, regulatory

and customer issues, including enhancing risk management of sales practices,

product design and maintenance and financial crime systems and processes.

Non-financial

0%100%150%

0%100%150%

0% of target

Weighted outcome (combined):

7% of target (4% of maximum)

Customer outcomes (20%)

Primary measures of performance include net promoter scores (NPS) and complaints

handling.

• Improved service quality for our customers resulting in solid customer growth and

an improvement in NPS. The Business division achieved its target to maintain the

Number 1 ranking on both Customer Satisfaction and NPS having widened the gap

to Number 2. The Consumer division narrowed the gap to Number 1 on NPS and

maintained the Number 2 ranking for the majority of the year.

• Improved how we manage complaints across the Group, through rollout of Group-

wide Complaints Management Framework, refreshed training, simplified internal

processes, detailed root cause analysis and dedicated support for vulnerable

customers. This resulted in a 46% reduction in the average time taken to resolve

issues for customers (which exceeded the 10% target) and the closure of over 1,100

long dated complaints.

[Non-financial]

0%100%150%

99% of target

Weighted outcome:

20% of target (13% of maximum)

TargetMaximumOutcome

w
1

2

3

4

572019 Westpac Group Annual Report

Directors’ report

Customer service transformation (15%)

Primary measures of performance include delivery of strategic initiatives.

• Delivered customer benefits and improved strategic capability through progress in

relation to Service Revolution Transformation milestones, including the Customer

Service Hub and Panorama.

• Significant investment in technology simplification and foundational platforms

improving stability, functionality and efficiency of the technology environment.

• Number of digitally active consumers up 4% and an increase in digital sales in the

Consumer and Business divisions.

• Achieved the target structural productivity of $405 million, a 33% uplift from 2018

and a net ~5% reduction in FTE over the year.

• Execution of the ‘Wealth Reset’ (including the exit of advice business), helping

to deliver a better and more integrated experience for customers and reducing

structural costs.

0%100%150%

100% of target

Weighted outcome:

15% of target (10% of maximum)

Culture and capability (10%)

Performance is measured based on delivery of key people initiatives that further drive

the organisation’s change agenda.

• Delivered key milestones as part of our people strategy within budget and on

schedule, including human capital management systems and the efficiency of the

organisation’s structure, for example, reducing layers between decision makers and

customers.

• Strengthened succession planning across our talent base following the structural

shifts made in the first half of the year.

• Implemented a number of recommendations stemming from the Royal

Commission and our Culture, Governance and Accountability report.

• Employee engagement has remained stable in a challenging industry environment.

Monthly spot engagement numbers have increased during the year in line with the

delivery of our strategy and remediation activity.

0%100%150%

0%

100%150%

102% of target

Weighted outcome:

10% of target (7% of maximum)

Modifier and final outcome

The 2019 STVR outcome for the CEO was zero.

(

Target STVR opportunity

x

Scorecard focus areas outcome

)


Scorecard modifier reduction

=

Final outcome

$2,686,00060% of target (40% of maximum)Zero

The CEO recommended to the Board that he forego his STVR for this year. Notwithstanding the scorecard outcome

of 60% of target, the Board separately considered the matter and determined that a zero STVR outcome for 2019 for

the CEO was appropriate to reflect accountability for poor non-financial risk and financial outcomes, as well as some

poor customer outcomes, including those highlighted at the Royal Commission.

2019 Group Executive short term variable reward outcomes

The focus areas of the CEO scorecard are cascaded to Group Executives in combination with other relevant

divisional or functional measures.

2019 STVR outcomes for Group Executives ranged from 0% to 83% of the target opportunity (or 0% to 55% of the

maximum opportunity). The average 2019 STVR outcome for Group Executives was 56% of the target opportunity

(or 37% of the maximum opportunity), down from 87% in 2018.

The average 2019 STVR outcome for functional Group Executives was 70% of the target opportunity. The average

2019 STVR outcome for Australia based Group Executives leading major divisions (including Consumer, Business,

Westpac Institutional Bank and the former BT Financial Group) was 30% of the target opportunity.

The variability in outcomes reflects the lower weighting of financial and customer measures in scorecards for

functional Group Executives in line with the nature of their roles and responsibilities.

In addition, individual and divisional performance impacted STVR outcomes, as well as the application of

downward remuneration adjustments for material risk and compliance matters.

The 2019 STVR outcomes for the CEO and Group Executives are detailed in the following section.

582019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Directors’ report

3.6. Variable reward awarded in 2019 (unaudited)

The table below shows the variable reward awarded to the CEO and Group Executives in 2019, including:

• STVR outcomes for 2019

1

(including the cash and deferred equity components

2

); and

• equity granted under the 2019 LTVR plan

3

.

The final value of equity received by the CEO and Group Executives will depend on the share price at the time

of vesting and the number of restricted shares or share rights that vest, subject to performance hurdles (where

applicable), continued service and adjustment.

The value of equity differs from the disclosure in section 7 which provides the annualised accounting value for

unvested equity awards prepared in accordance with the AAS.

2019 STVR award2019 LTVR award

Name

Target

STVR

opportunity

Maximum

STVR

opportunity

STVR

award (as %

of target)

STVR

award

(as % of

maximum)

STVR

outcome

2


Maximum

STVR

foregone Fair value

3

Face value

4

Managing Director & Chief Executive Officer

Brian Hartzer 2,686,000 4,029,000 0%0%0 4,029,000 2,528,000 5,616,534

Current Group Executives

Craig Bright

5


Chief Information Officer 918,000 1,377,000 83%55% 762,000 615,000 864,000 2,082,651

Lyn Cobley

Chief Executive,

Westpac Institutional Bank 1,122,000 1,683,000 60%40% 677,000 1,006,000 1,056,000 2,346,148

Peter King

Chief Financial Officer 1,088,000 1,632,000 60%40% 653,000 979,000 1,024,000 2,275,045

Rebecca Lim

Group Executive,

Legal & Secretariat 750,000 1,125,000 70%47% 525,000 600,000 700,000 1,555,172

David Lindberg

Chief Executive,

Consumer 1,124,000 1,686,000 22%15% 250,000 1,436,000 1,052,000 2,344,576

Carolyn McCann

Group Executive,

Customer & Corporate Relations 555,000 832,500 70%47% 389,000 443,500 555,000 1,233,059

David McLean

Chief Executive Officer,

Westpac New Zealand 1,028,900 1,543,350 83%55% 853,949 689,401 941,090 2,090,840

Christine Parker

Group Executive,

Human Resources 900,000 1,350,000 70%47% 630,000 720,000 816,000 1,812,901

David Stephen

Chief Risk Officer 1,350,000 2,025,000 69%46% 932,000 1,093,000 1,012,500 2,516,258

Gary Thursby

Chief Operating Officer 900,000 1,350,000 70%47% 630,000 720,000 850,000 1,888,451

Alastair Welsh

5


Acting Chief Executive, Business 400,000 600,000 68%45% 270,000 330,000 - -

Former Group Executives

Brad Cooper

5


Chief Executive Officer,

BT Financial Group 800,000 1,200,000 0%0%0 1,200,000 1,050,000 2,332,807

Dave Curran

5,6


Chief Information Officer - - -- - - - -

George Frazis

5


Chief Executive, Consumer Bank 800,000 1,200,000 0%0%0 1,200,000 1,000,000 2,221,730

Average Group Executive STVR award (%)56%37%

1. The target STVR opportunity and STVR award have been apportioned for part year KMP to reflect their time as KMP.

2. The deferred STVR (granted as restricted shares or unhurdled share rights) is 50% of the total STVR award for the year. The number of

restricted shares granted is determined by reference to the five day VWAP up to and including the day before the grant date. This is

adjusted for non-payment of dividends over the vesting period for unhurdled share rights. The five day VWAP for the 2018 award was

$24.86.

3. The fair value of the performance share rights is shown as at the commencement of the performance period and is determined by an

independent valuer using a Monte Carlo simulation pricing model, taking into consideration the life of the awards, the performance

hurdles and likelihood of vesting, non-payment of dividends prior to vesting and appropriate discount rates. The Board Remuneration

Committee caps the valuation at a maximum discount of 60% of the share price. The fair value of the 2019 award was capped at $11.12.

4. The face value of the performance share rights is calculated by multiplying the number of performance share rights granted during the

year by the five day VWAP up to and including the grant date. For the 2019 awards, the five day VWAP was $24.71 except for Craig

Bright and David Stephen where the five day VWAP was $26.81 and $27.64 respectively.

5. The information relates to the period the individual was a KMP. Refer to section 1 for further details.

6. Dave Curran was not eligible to receive a 2019 STVR or 2019 LTVR award.

1
2

3

4

592019 Westpac Group Annual Report

Directors’ report

4. Further detail on the executive variable reward structure

This section provides further details of the 2019 STVR and LTVR plans and changes for 2020.

4.1. Short term variable reward

The table below sets out the key design features of the 2019 STVR plan and changes for the 2020 STVR plan.

Short term variable reward plan

Plan structure50% of STVR is awarded in cash and 50% is deferred into equity in the form of restricted shares

(or unhurdled share rights for the Group Executive based outside Australia).

One unhurdled share right entitles the holder to one ordinary share at the time of vesting with no

exercise cost.

One restricted share provides the holder with one ordinary share at no cost subject to trading restrictions

until the time of vesting.

Dividends are paid on restricted shares from the grant date.

Target and maximum

opportunity

The target opportunity for the CEO and Group Executives is expressed as a percentage of fixed

remuneration. The target opportunity is set by the Board following recommendation from the Board

Remuneration Committee which considers a range of factors including market competitiveness and the

nature of the role.

Target STVR

(100% of fixed remuneration for the CEO and between

75% and 145% of fixed remuneration for Group Executives

Maximum STVR

(150% of target STVR)

0%100%150%

Remuneration at-risk

Westpac’s STVR is designed to award the target opportunity on

delivery of agreed plan targets for financial and non-financial

measures that support Westpac’s strategic priorities. It is possible

for the outcome to fall below the target amount depending on

performance relative to targets agreed at the beginning of the

year.

Reward for exceptional

performance

There is the possibility to

award up to a maximum of

150% of the STVR target

in circumstances where

exceptional outcomes are

achieved that are also in line

with the Group’s risk appetite

and where an individual

has acted in a manner that

exemplifies the encouraged

behaviours.

Performance measuresSTVR awards are determined based on performance against a balanced scorecard which is designed to

align with shareholder interests by setting challenging measures and seeks to ensure that our customers’

and employees’ needs are met and appropriate risk settings are maintained.

The scorecard is split into two sections:

• Focus areas: Performance is assessed against a balance of financial and non-financial metrics that are

imperative to supporting the effective execution of Westpac’s strategy; and

• Modifier: The Board and Board Remuneration Committee recognise that performance metrics may

not always appropriately reflect overall performance of the Group. The modifier supports adjustment

of the outcome, upwards or downwards (including to zero), for behaviour, risk and reputation matters,

people management matters, and any other matters that the Board feels are not fully reflected in the

focus areas.

Further information on focus areas and application of the modifier for the 2019 scorecard is provided in

section 3.

Deferred STVR awards recognise past performance and are subject to continued service and adjustment.

Deferral period50% of STVR is deferred into equity for a period of up to two years, which aligns executive remuneration

with shareholder interests and acts as a retention mechanism. The deferral period also allows the Board

to apply discretion to reduce deferred components where necessary.

Deferred STVR vests in equal portions one and two years after the grant date, subject to continued

service and adjustment.

Delayed vestingThe Board also has discretion (subject to law) to delay vesting of equity-based awards if the individual is

under investigation for misconduct, the subject of or implicated in legal or regulatory proceedings, if the

Board is considering an adjustment or if otherwise required by law.

Remuneration adjustments for

prior period matters

The Board has discretion to adjust current year STVR.

The Board may also adjust unvested deferred STVR downwards, including to zero, if circumstances

or information come to light which mean that in the Board’s view all or part of the award was not

appropriate.

The Board will typically apply the adjustment to unvested STVR where an adjustment to current year

STVR is considered insufficient or unavailable.

Changes for 2020 Clawback will apply, to the extent legally permissible and practicable, to deferred STVR awarded in

respect of performance periods commencing on or after 1 October 2019 for up to seven years from

the date of grant. Clawback may occur in circumstances of serious or gross misconduct, fraud, bribery,

severe reputational damage, and any other deliberate, reckless or unlawful conduct that may have a

serious adverse impact on Westpac, its customers or its people which has resulted in dismissal or the

Board considers at its discretion would have justified the dismissal of the relevant executive or where

otherwise required by law. It is the Board’s current intention that clawback will only be considered for

relevant conduct that occurred on or after 1 October 2019.

602019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Directors’ report

4.2. Long Term Variable Reward

The table below sets out the key design features of the 2019 LTVR Plan awarded in December 2018 and changes

for the 2020 LTVR plan.

Long term variable reward plan

Plan structureLTVR is awarded in performance share rights which vest after four years subject to the achievement of

performance hurdles, continued service and adjustment.

One performance share right entitles the holder to one ordinary share at the time of vesting with no exercise

cost. Dividends are not accumulated on performance share rights.

Award opportunityThe value of LTVR awarded to the CEO and Group Executives is expressed as a percentage of fixed

remuneration. The value of LTVR is set by the Board following recommendation from the Board

Remuneration Committee which considers a range of factors including market competitiveness and the

nature of the role.

The face value of the LTVR opportunity for the CEO for 2019 is 235% of fixed remuneration, and the face

value of LTVR opportunities for the Group Executives (excluding acting Group Executives) range between

185% and 240% of fixed remuneration.

Refer below for changes to apply for the 2020 LTVR award.

Allocation methodologyIn 2019 and prior years, the number of performance share rights each executive received was determined

by dividing the dollar value of the LTVR award by the fair value of the share right at the beginning of the

performance period. This is valued by an independent valuer using a Monte Carlo simulation pricing model,

taking into consideration the life of the awards, the performance hurdles and likelihood of vesting, non-

payment of dividends prior to vesting and appropriate discount rates. The Board Remuneration Committee

caps the valuation at a maximum discount of 60% of the share price. The value of a relative TSR hurdled

performance share right may be different to the value of a cash ROE hurdled performance share right.

Refer below for changes to apply for the 2020 LTVR award.

Performance hurdlesLTVR performance hurdles represent a balance of internal and external measures that aims to achieve

long-term growth in shareholders’ value and support alignment between executive reward and shareholder

interests.

Relative Total Shareholder Return

50% of the award

Cash return on equity

50% of the award

Relative TSR hurdled performance share rights

only vest where Westpac’s TSR exceeds that of key

competitors.

Relative TSR is a measure of the total return

delivered to shareholders over the performance

period assuming dividends are reinvested, relative

to peers.

The performance hurdle measures Westpac’s TSR

performance over a four year period against a

composite index. The composite index is comprised

of a group of 10 peers with more weight placed on

the three other major Australian banks.

At the end of the performance period, TSR

performance of each index company is multiplied

by its index weighting, and the total of the 10 scores

determines the composite TSR index.

50% will vest if Westpac’s TSR performance

equals the composite TSR index. For 100% to vest,

Westpac’s TSR outcome must exceed the index by

21.55 (i.e. 5% compound annual growth over the four

year performance period) as illustrated below.

100

75

50

25

%

of all ocation

vesting

Relative Total Shareholder Return vesting

Index

Index exceeded by

21 .55

Relative TSR perfor mance

The performance hurdle measures the average cash

return on average ordinary equity over a three year

performance period (with an additional one year

holding lock).

The performance hurdle aims to reward the

achievement of returns above Westpac’s cost of

capital while generating shareholder value and

improving how efficiently the Group uses capital

resources within its risk appetite.

The performance period for cash ROE differs to the

TSR performance period because TSR is an external

measure that can be calculated on an ongoing basis

whereas cash ROE is an internal measure where

the hurdle reflects the time horizon of our financial

forecasting.

The graph below shows the performance levels

required for the cash ROE performance share rights

to vest.

100

75

50

25

%

of allo

cation

Cash return on equity vesting

14%

Cash ROE perfor mance

13%

The companies in the 2019 composite TSR index and their relative weightings are:

ANZ Banking Group

Commonwealth Bank

National Australia Bank

AMP

Bank of Queensland

16.67%

16.67%

16.67%

7.14%

7.14%

Bendigo and Adelaide Bank

Challenger

Macquarie Group

Perpetual

Suncorp Group

7.14%

7.14%

7.14%

7.14%

7.14%

Refer below for changes to apply for the 2020 LTVR award.

1
2

3

4

612019 Westpac Group Annual Report

Directors’ report

Long term variable reward plan

Assessment of

performance outcomes

Relative Total Shareholder Return

The relative TSR result is calculated independently

to ensure objectivity and external validation before

being provided to the Board to determine the vesting

outcome.

The Board may exercise discretion in determining the

final vesting outcome, for example where relative TSR

performance hurdles have been met but the absolute

TSR outcome is negative.

Performance share rights subject to relative TSR

performance will be tested against the performance

hurdle on 30 September 2022.

Cash return on equity

The cash ROE outcome is determined by the Board

based on cash ROE disclosed in the Group’s results

over the performance period.

The Board may exercise discretion in determining the

final vesting outcome.

Performance share rights subject to cash ROE

performance will be tested against the performance

hurdle on 30 September 2021 and will be subject

to an additional one year holding lock through to

30 September 2022.

No re-testingThere is no re-testing. Awards that have not vested after the measurement period lapse immediately.

Early vestingUnvested awards may vest before a test date if the executive is no longer employed by the Group due to

death or disability (subject to law). In these cases, vesting is generally not subject to the performance hurdles

being met.

Delayed vestingThe Board also has discretion (subject to law) to delay vesting of equity-based awards if the individual is

under investigation for misconduct, the subject of or implicated in legal or regulatory proceedings, if the

Board is considering an adjustment or if otherwise required by law.

Treatment of awards on

cessation of employment

The Board has the discretion to determine the treatment of unvested performance share rights where the

CEO or a Group Executive resigns, retires or otherwise leaves the Group before vesting occurs.

The Board may choose to accelerate the vesting of performance share rights or leave the awards on foot for

the remainder of the performance period.

In exercising its discretion, the Board will consider relevant circumstances including those relating to the

departure.

The Board also has the ability to adjust the number of performance share rights downwards (including to

zero) in the event of misconduct resulting in significant financial and/or reputational impact to the Group and

in other circumstances considered appropriate.

Where an executive acts fraudulently or dishonestly, or is in material breach of their obligations under the

relevant equity plan, unexercised performance share rights (whether vested or unvested) will be forfeited

unless the Board determines otherwise.

Remuneration

adjustments for prior

period matters

The Board has discretion to adjust LTVR which is awarded on a prospective basis.

The Board may also adjust unvested LTVR downwards, including to zero, if circumstances or information

come to light which mean that in the Board’s view all or part of the award was not appropriate.

The Board will typically apply the adjustment to unvested LTVR where an adjustment to current and deferred

STVR is considered insufficient or unavailable.

Changes for 2020Allocation methodology: From the 2020 LTVR plan onwards, the number of performance share rights each

executive receives will be determined by dividing the dollar value of the LTVR award by the face value of

performance share rights. The face value is the five day VWAP up to the commencement of the performance

period (which is 1 October 2019 for the 2020 LTVR grant).

Award opportunity: The Board reduced the face value of 2020 LTVR opportunities by 43% for the CEO and

23% to 25% for Group Executives (excluding acting Group Executives). When setting LTVR opportunities

for the CEO and Group Executives, the Board took into account that no dividends are payable on LTVR

performance share rights, the minimum variable remuneration deferrals required by Banking Executive

Accountability Regime (BEAR) and the overall market positioning of the executives’ remuneration

(including adjusting from a fair value to face value allocation methodology). The face value of the 2020

LTVR opportunity for the CEO is 133% of fixed remuneration, and the 2020 LTVR opportunities for Group

Executives (excluding acting Group Executives) range between 140% and 180% of fixed remuneration. The

Board intends the same percentages of fixed remuneration to apply to the determination of LTVR grants at

face value in future years, subject to market benchmarking and any changes that may flow from the release

of APRA’s final regulatory framework for remuneration.

Performance hurdle: Relative TSR has been selected as the performance hurdle for the 2020 LTVR plan as

the Board believes this measure best aligns executive remuneration outcomes with long-term shareholder

value creation. The Board considers that setting an absolute cash ROE range over a three year period

has become increasingly difficult in light of current uncertainties surrounding future regulatory capital

requirements and interest rates, which are at historically low levels. The Board will review the 2021 LTVR plan

following the release of APRA’s final regulatory framework for remuneration.

Clawback: Clawback will apply, to the extent legally permissible and practicable, to LTVR awarded in respect

of performance periods commencing on or after 1 October 2019 for up to seven years from the date of grant.

Clawback may occur in circumstances of serious or gross misconduct, fraud, bribery, severe reputational

damage, and any other deliberate, reckless or unlawful conduct that may have a serious adverse impact on

Westpac, its customers or its people which has resulted in dismissal or the Board considers at its discretion

would have justified the dismissal of the relevant executive or where otherwise required by law. It is the

Board’s current intention that clawback will only be considered for relevant conduct that occurred on or after

1 October 2019.

The table below details other LTVR awards currently on foot.

Vesting datePerformance hurdlesFurther detail

2017 LTVR award30 September 2020• Relative TSR performance against a weighted composite index

of comparator companies (50%)

• Average cash ROE performance (50%)

Refer to the 2017

Annual Report

2018 LTVR award30 September 2021• Relative TSR performance against a weighted composite index

of comparator companies (50%)

• Average cash ROE performance (50%)

Refer to the 2018

Annual Report

622019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Directors’ report

5. Remuneration governance

5.1. Remuneration policy and governance oversight

Westpac’s remuneration policy sets out the mandatory requirements to be reflected in the design and

management of remuneration arrangements across Westpac.

The policy supports Westpac’s vision by requiring the design and management of remuneration to align with

stakeholder interests, support long-term financial soundness and encourage prudent risk management.

The policy is supported by an established governance structure, plans and frameworks, that are designed to

support remuneration decision-making across the Group.

Board

The Board provides strategic guidance for the Group and has oversight of management. The Board has overall

accountability for reviewing and approving executive remuneration as well as Non-executive Director Board and

Committee fees (subject to the Board fee pool approved by shareholders).

Without limiting its role, the Board approves (following recommendation from the Board Remuneration

Committee) performance targets for the CEO, the size of variable reward pools, remuneration (including variable

reward targets and performance outcomes) for the CEO, Group Executives, any other accountable persons

under the BEAR, other persons whose activities in the Board’s opinion affect the financial soundness of the

Group, any other person specified by APRA and any other person the Board determines.

The Board has the discretion to defer, adjust or withdraw aggregate and individual variable reward.

Further detail is contained in the Board and Committee Charters which are available on Westpac’s website.

Board Remuneration Committee

The Board Remuneration Committee assists the Board to fulfil its remuneration responsibilities to shareholders

by monitoring the remuneration policies and practices of the Group and their effectiveness, external

remuneration practices, market expectations and regulatory requirements in Australia and globally. The Board

Remuneration Committee reviews and makes recommendations to the Board in relation to the individual

remuneration levels of individuals outlined above, STVR and LTVR plans and outcomes for the Group Executives

and any other Accountable Persons under the BEAR as well as performance goals and objectives relevant to the

remuneration of the CEO and any and all equity based plans.

In carrying out its duties, the Board Remuneration Committee accesses risk and financial control personnel and

engages external advisers who are independent of management.

Members of the Board Remuneration Committee are independent Non-executive Directors.

Further detail is contained in the Board Remuneration Committee Charter which is available on Westpac’s website.

Interaction with other Board CommitteesManagement remuneration oversight committees

The Chairman of the Board Risk & Compliance

Committee is also a member of the Board

Remuneration Committee. Members of the Board

Remuneration Committee are all members of the

Board Risk & Compliance Committee. The cross

membership of both Committees supports alignment

between risk and reward.

The Board Remuneration Committee seeks feedback

from and considers matters raised by the Board

Risk & Compliance Committee and Board Audit

Committee with respect to remuneration outcomes,

adjustments to remuneration in light of relevant

matters and alignment of remuneration with the risk

management framework.

Divisional remuneration oversight committees

consider areas of risk within the divisions and

consider potential implications for remuneration.

These committees report to the Group Remuneration

Oversight Committee which in turn considers

consistency of remuneration across the Group and

provides information to the Board Remuneration

Committee and Board for review and decision-making

as appropriate.

During the financial year, remuneration governance

arrangements were reviewed and changes were

made to the Terms of Reference for the Group

Remuneration Oversight Committee. This included

an added responsibility for the Group Remuneration

Oversight Committee to review the design and

implementation of remuneration systems for front line

staff, annually, in line with Recommendation 5.4 from

the Royal Commission.

Remuneration consultants

In 2019, the Board retained Guerdon Associates as its independent consultant to provide specialist information

on executive remuneration and other remuneration matters. The services were provided directly to the Board

Remuneration Committee independent of management. The Chairman of the Board Remuneration Committee oversees

the engagement and associated costs. Work undertaken by Guerdon Associates during 2019 included the provision of

information relating to the benchmarking of Non-executive Director, CEO and Group Executive remuneration.

In 2019, no remuneration recommendations, as prescribed under the Corporations Act, were made by Guerdon

Associates.

1
2

3

4

632019 Westpac Group Annual Report

Directors’ report

5.2. Executive minimum shareholding requirements and current compliance

The CEO and Group Executives are required to build and maintain a significant Westpac shareholding within five

years of their appointment to strengthen alignment with shareholder interests.

At 30 September 2019, the CEO and all Group Executives comply with the requirement. The table below sets out

the minimum shareholding requirement for the CEO and Group Executives.

Minimum shareholding requirement

Chief Executive OfficerFive times annual fixed remuneration excluding superannuation, equivalent to $12.26 million

Group ExecutivesEquivalent to $1.2 million

The multiple for the CEO’s shareholding requirement is higher than that of his peers and reflects Westpac’s

approach to calculating the minimum shareholding requirement.

Since 2006, the following has been included for the purpose of calculating the minimum shareholding requirement:

• shares held outright in the individual’s name either solely or jointly with another person;

• shares held in an employee share plan (including deferred STVR); and

• 50% of any unvested performance share rights (including LTVR).

The assessment approach has included shares held in a family trust or self-managed super fund since 2012.

The minimum shareholding requirement will be reviewed in 2020 following the release of APRA’s final regulatory

framework for remuneration.

5.3. Hedging policy

Participants in Westpac’s equity plans are forbidden from entering, either directly or indirectly, into hedging

arrangements for unvested awards in the STVR and LTVR plans. No financial products may be used to mitigate

the risk associated with these awards. Any attempt to hedge awards will result in forfeiture and the Board may

consider other disciplinary action. These restrictions satisfy the requirements of the Corporations Act which

prohibits hedging of unvested awards.

5.4. Employment agreements

The remuneration and other terms of employment for the CEO and Group Executives are formalised in their

employment agreements. Each agreement provides for the payment of fixed and variable reward, employer

superannuation contributions and other benefits such as death and disablement insurance cover.

The table below details the key terms including termination provisions of the employment agreements for the CEO

and Group Executives in 2019.

TermWhoConditions

Duration of agreementCEO and Group Executives• Ongoing until notice given by either party

Notice (by the executive or the Group) to

terminate employment

CEO and Group Executives• 12 months

1

Termination payments on termination

without cause

2

CEO and Group Executives• Deferred STVR and LTVR awards vest

according to the applicable equity plan

rules

Termination for causeCEO and Group Executives (excluding

Brad Cooper)

• Immediately for misconduct

• 3 months’ notice for poor performance

Brad Cooper

3

• Immediately for misconduct

• Contractual notice period for poor

performance

Post-employment restraintsCEO and Group Executives• 12 month non-solicitation restraint

1. Payment in lieu of notice may in certain circumstances be approved by the Board for some or all of the notice period.

2. The maximum liability for termination benefits for the CEO and Group Executives at 30 September 2019 was $16.0 million

(2018: $14.1 million).

3. Brad Cooper ceased in his KMP role as the Chief Executive Officer, BT Financial Group on 1 April 2019.

642019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Directors’ report

6. Non-executive Director remuneration

6.1. Structure and policy

Westpac’s Non-executive Director remuneration strategy is designed to attract and retain experienced, qualified

Board members and provide appropriate remuneration for their time and expertise.

Non-executive Director fees are not related to Westpac’s results. All fees are paid in cash and no discretionary

payments are made for performance. Non-executive Directors are required to build and maintain a minimum

shareholding to align their interests with those of shareholders (refer to section 6.4 for further details).

The table below sets out the components of Non-executive Director remuneration.

Non-executive Director remuneration

Base feeRelates to service on the Westpac Banking Corporation Board. The base fee for the Chairman covers

all responsibilities, including for Board Committees.

Committee feesAdditional fees are paid to Non-executive Directors (other than the Board Chairman) for chairing or

participating in Board Committees other than the Board Nominations Committee.

Employer superannuation

contributions

Reflects statutory superannuation contributions which are capped at the superannuation maximum

contributions base as prescribed under the Superannuation Guarantee legislation.

Subsidiary Board and Advisory

Board fees

Relates to service on Subsidiary Boards and Advisory Boards and are paid by the relevant subsidiary.

6.2. Non-executive Director remuneration in 2019

The base fees payable to the Chairman and other Non-executive Directors were reduced by 20% for 2019 as a

one-off measure. The reduction was applied to all current Non-executive Directors in recognition of the collective

accountability as the Board of Westpac for customer outcomes highlighted by the Royal Commission, shareholder

sentiment leading to the first strike at the 2018 Annual General Meeting and significant non-financial risk matters.

In addition, the Board Risk & Compliance Committee Chairman fee was increased from $70,400 to $90,000

effective 1 October 2018 to reflect the significant increase in the workload of the Committee Chairman. The table

below sets out the annual Board and standing Committee fees and the changes for 2019.

The Non-executive Director fee pool of $4.5 million per annum was approved by shareholders at the 2008

Annual General Meeting. For 2019, $3.11 million (69%) of the fee pool was used. The fee pool includes employer

superannuation contributions.

Base and Committee fees

Annual fee

$Changes for 2019

Chairman810,000One-off reduction of

$162,000 to $648,000

Other Non-executive Directors225,000One-off reduction of

$45,000 to $180,000

Committee Chairman fees

Board Audit Committee70,400No change

Board Risk & Compliance Committee90,000Fee increase to

$90,000 (from $70,400)

effective 1 October 2018

Board Remuneration Committee63,800No change

Board Technology Committee35,200No change

Committee membership fees

Board Audit Committee32,000No change

Board Risk & Compliance Committee32,000No change

Board Remuneration Committee29,000No change

Board Technology Committee20,000No change

Subsidiary Board and Advisory Board fees

During the reporting period, additional fees of $7,241 were paid to Peter Hawkins as a member of the Westpac

Group Victoria Advisory Board (formerly Bank of Melbourne Advisory Board) (during the period in which he was a

KMP) and additional fees of $83,146 were paid to Anita Fung as a member of the Westpac Asia Advisory Board.

1
2

3

4

652019 Westpac Group Annual Report

Directors’ report

6.3. Changes to Board and Committee composition

The table below outlines the changes that were made to the Board and Committee composition during the year

ended 30 September 2019.

Name of Non-executive DirectorChange in positionEffective date

Anita Fung• Appointed Non-executive Director

• Appointed member of the Board Risk & Compliance Committee

1 October 2018

Peter Hawkins• Retired from the Board12 December 2018 following

the completion of the 2018

Annual General Meeting

Ewen Crouch• Appointed member of the Board Audit Committee1 January 2019

Steven Harker• Appointed Non-executive Director

• Appointed member of the Board Risk & Compliance Committee

1 March 2019

Margaret Seale• Appointed Non-executive Director

• Appointed member of the Board Risk & Compliance Committee

1 March 2019

6.4. Non-executive Director minimum shareholding requirement

Non-executive Directors are required to build and maintain a holding in Westpac ordinary shares to align their

interests with those of shareholders. Each Non-executive Director is required to hold an interest in shares in

Westpac with a market value not less than the Board base fee, within five years of appointment to the Board.

At 30 September 2019, all Non-executive Directors comply with the requirement.

662019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Directors’ report

7. Statutory remuneration details

7.1. Details of Non-executive Director remuneration

The table below details Non-executive Director remuneration.

Short-term benefits

Post-employment

benefits

Westpac Banking

Corporation Board

fees

1

Subsidiary and

Advisory Board

fees

Non-

monetary

benefits

3

SuperannuationTotal

Name$$$$$

Current Non-executive Directors

Lindsay Maxsted, Chairman

2019 648,000 -- 20,658 668,658

2018810,000--20,181830,181

Nerida Caesar

2019 232,000 -- 20,658 252,658

2018277,000--20,181297,181

Ewen Crouch

2019 323,000 -- 20,658 343,658

2018324,400--20,181344,581

Alison Deans

2019 276,200 -- 20,658 296,858

2018312,965--20,181333,146

Craig Dunn

2019 275,800 -- 20,658 296,458

2018320,800--20,181340,981

Anita Fung

2019212,000 83,146 6,300 20,658322,104

2018---------------------------------- Not a KMP in 2018----------------------------------

Steven Harker

2

2019123,667--11,972135,639

2018---------------------------------- Not a KMP in 2018----------------------------------

Peter Marriott

2019 302,400 -- 20,658 323,058

2018347,400--20,181367,581

Peter Nash

2019 244,000 -- 20,658 264,658

2018164,690--11,744176,434

Margaret Seale

2

2019123,667-- 11,972 135,639

2018---------------------------------- Not a KMP in 2018----------------------------------

Former Non-executive Director

Peter Hawkins

2

201964,3757, 241-4,24875,864

2018311,83235,000-20,103366,935

Total fees

20192,825,10990,3876,300193,4563,115,252

20182,869,08835,000-152,9313,057,020

1. Includes fees paid to the Chairman and members of Board Committees.

2. The information relates to the period the individual was a KMP. Refer to section 1 for further details.

3. Non-monetary benefits are determined on the basis of the cost to the Group (including associated fringe benefits tax (FBT), where

applicable) and include provision of taxation advice.

1
2

3

4

672019 Westpac Group Annual Report

Directors’ report

7.2. Remuneration details – Chief Executive Officer and Group Executives

The table below sets out details of remuneration for the CEO and Group Executives calculated in accordance with

the AAS.

Short-term benefits

Post-

employment

benefits

Other

long-term

benefitsShare-based payments

Fixed

remuneration

1

Cash

STVR

award

2

Non-

monetary

benefits

3

Other

short-term

benefits

4

Superannuation

benefits

5

Long

service

leave

Restricted

shares

6

Share

rights

7, 8

Total

9

$$$$$$$$$

Managing Director & Chief Executive Officer

Brian Hartzer

20192,608,424-21,966 - 44,32040,6601,169,5811,168,0405,052,991

20182,730,714 1,040,825 20,618 - 42,235 40,697 1,449,964 1,247,127 6,572,180

Current Group Executives

Craig Bright, Chief Information Officer

10,11

2019 1,022,829 381,000 309,495 1,050,000 23,81815,137 2,075,911 170,797 5,048,987

2018------------------------------------------------------- Not a KMP in 2018 -------------------------------------------------------

Lyn Cobley, Chief Executive, Westpac Institutional Bank

20191,108,830338,5004,948 - 30,61116,995516,242508,4372,524,563

20181,085,585 465,500 4,039 - 29,993 17,000 749,930 394,975 2,747,022

Peter King, Chief Financial Officer

20191,222,006326,5004,238 - 36,80319,492549,189483,6922,641,920

20181,232,059 517,000 2,924 - 34,957 90,204 597,487 512,401 2,987,032

Rebecca Lim, Group Executive, Legal & Secretariat

2019950,128262,5004,981 - 31,71814,390422,793260,1081,946,618

2018903,728 356,500 2,924 - 29,912 55,507 512,169 348,768 2,209,508

David Lindberg, Chief Executive, Consumer

20191,129,075125,0006,592 - 30,43423,822470,092475,3682,260,383

20181,049,010 440,500 4,014 - 28,365 25,006 518,657 435,208 2,500,760

Carolyn McCann, Group Executive, Customer & Corporate Relations

2019731,367194,5004,828 - 21,57911,198445,723186,5631,595,758

2018241,365 74,500 1,915 - 5,579 12,665 144,344 25,395 505,763

David McLean, Chief Executive Officer, Westpac New Zealand

2019861,551426,9751,194 - 8 7,7 1 0 - - 907,5802,285,010

2018849,488 498,439 55,885 - 81,444 - - 785,206 2,270,462

Christine Parker, Group Executive, Human Resources

2019875,430315,0003,123 - 27,420(33,023)456,373384,0052,028,328

2018865,802 427,500 2,924 - 26,848 (8,854)500,697 399,535 2,214,452

David Stephen, Chief Risk Officer

2019 1,816,090 466,000 263,844 - 25,90027,2652,023,326 732,611 5,355,036

2018------------------------------------------------------- Not a KMP in 2018 -------------------------------------------------------

Gary Thursby, Chief Operating Officer

2019881,655315,0003,123 - 29,60523,294423,765306,6721,983,114

2018794,889 395,500 2,924 - 28,616 12,693 453,951 344,305 2,032,878

Alastair Welsh, Acting Chief Executive, Business

10

2019 369,151 135,000 438 - 11,861 6,557207,066 13,321 743,394

2018------------------------------------------------------- Not a KMP in 2018 -------------------------------------------------------

Former Group Executives

Brad Cooper, Chief Executive Officer, BT Financial Group

10,12,14

20191,553,160-27,860 - 95,64014,402608,2151,826,9724,126,249

20181,136,073 400,000 17,861- 29,366 16,700 778,096 538,531 2,916,627

Dave Curran, Chief Information Officer

10,14,15

2019173,917 - 1,115 36,475 6,019(45,839)140,1291,309,0461,620,862

20181,021,322 485,000 2,924 - 28,806 20,703 531,367 480,835 2,570,957

George Frazis, Chief Executive, Consumer Bank

10,13,14

20195 57,7 8 9-28,279522,50915,989(97,778)709,9401,739,9233,476,651

20181,109,913 480,000 16,771- 38,132 17,425 858,110 489,032 3,009,383

682019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Directors’ report

1. Fixed remuneration is the total cost of salary, salary sacrificed benefits (including motor vehicles, parking and associated FBT) and an

accrual for annual leave entitlements.

2. 2019 STVR awards reflect annual cash performance awards accrued but not yet paid in respect of the year ended 30 September 2019.

STVR awards are paid in December.

3. Non-monetary benefits are determined on the basis of the cost to the Group (including associated FBT, where applicable) and include

annual health checks, provision of taxation advice, bank funded car parking, relocation costs, living away from home expenses and

allowances. In the 2018 and 2017 Remuneration Reports, non-monetary benefits were understated and 2018 values for two individuals

have been amended in the table above. For 2017, a total of $27,694 was understated reflecting additional car parking benefits.

4. Includes payments on cessation of employment or other contracted amounts.

5. The CEO and Group Executives are provided with life insurance cover under the Westpac Group Plan at no cost. Superannuation

benefits have been calculated consistent with AASB 119 Employee Benefits.

6. The value of restricted shares is amortised over the applicable vesting period and the amount shown is the amortisation relating to 2019

(and 2018 for comparison). The restricted shares held by Craig Bright and David Stephen represent an allocation made in substitution

for forgone unvested equity on joining the Westpac Group. The restricted shares replicate the vesting periods of the equity forgone.

7. Equity-settled remuneration is based on the amortisation over the vesting period (normally one, two or four years) of the fair value

at grant date of hurdled and unhurdled options and share rights that were granted during the four years ended 30 September 2019.

Details of prior year grants are disclosed in previous Annual Reports. The 2019 value for David McLean includes 53% attributed to

deferred STVR awards. The 2019 value for David Stephen includes an allocation of hurdled share rights made in substitution for

unvested equity foregone on joining the Westpac Group, and is subject to Westpac’s 2018 LTVR performance hurdles and vesting

criteria.

8. The expensed value of the 2017 LTVR cash ROE hurdled performance share rights has been reduced to zero. The expensed value of the

2018 and 2019 LTVR cash ROE hurdled performance share rights have been reduced by 50%. This reflects the current assessment of the

probability of vesting.

9. The percentage of the total remuneration which is performance-related (i.e. cash STVR award plus share-based payments) was: Brian

Hartzer 46%, Craig Bright 52%, Lyn Cobley 54%, Peter King 51%, Rebecca Lim 49%, David Lindberg 47%, Carolyn McCann 52%, David

McLean 58%, Christine Parker 57%, David Stephen 60%, Gary Thursby 53%, Alastair Welsh 48%, Brad Cooper 59%, Dave Curran 89% and

George Frazis 70%. The percentage of total remuneration delivered in the form of options (including share rights) was: Brian Hartzer

23%, Craig Bright 3%, Lyn Cobley 20%, Peter King 18%, Rebecca Lim 13%, David Lindberg 21%, Carolyn McCann 12%, David McLean 40%,

Christine Parker 19%, David Stephen 14%, Gary Thursby 15%, Alastair Welsh 2%, Brad Cooper 44%, Dave Curran 81% and George Frazis

50%.

10. The information relates to the period the individual was a KMP. Refer to section 1 for further details.

11. Craig Bright received a one-off cash payment of $1,050,000 in lieu of variable reward forfeited from his previous employer on joining

the Westpac Group.

12. The information relates to Brad Cooper’s KMP role. This includes payments made or to be made during his 12 month notice period from

1 August 2019 to 31 July 2020, where Brad continues to receive fixed remuneration and superannuation. From 1 April 2019 to 31 July

2019, Brad acted as an advisor to the Group and received fixed remuneration of $371,730 (including superannuation), which has been

excluded from the table on the basis that it did not relate to his KMP role.

13. The information relates to George Frazis’ KMP role. From 1 April 2019 to 31 August 2019, George acted as an advisor to the Group and

received fixed remuneration of $480,709 (including superannuation), which has been excluded from the table on the basis that it did

not relate to his KMP role. The value of other short-term benefits relates to payments on cessation of employment, including 4 months’

pay in lieu of notice ($383,333) and annual leave and long service leave entitlements ($139,176).

14. The share based payment values for Brad Cooper, Dave Curran and George Frazis reflect the accruals for all unvested equity up to the

end of each performance period. For example, the 2019 LTVR will include the accrual for four years until the vesting date in lieu of a

single year accrual value for 2018. While the full value is being accrued for all unvested equity, the awards may or may not vest subject

to the relevant performance hurdles.

15. Dave Curran was not eligible to receive a 2019 STVR or 2019 LTVR award.

1
2

3

4

692019 Westpac Group Annual Report

Directors’ report

1. No performance options were granted in 2019. Deferred STVR awards in the form of restricted shares or unhurdled share rights

(for David McLean based in New Zealand) are awarded in December. David McLean’s unhurdled share rights were granted on 19

December 2018 at a fair value of $23.37 (unhurdled share rights which vested on 1 October 2019) and $21.88 (unhurdled rights vesting

on 1 October 2020).

2. No hurdled share rights granted in 2014 vested in October 2018 when assessed against the relative TSR and cash EPS performance

hurdles.

3. Vested options and share rights that were awarded prior to October 2009 can be exercised up to a maximum of 10 years from their

commencement date. Vested share rights awarded between October 2009 and July 2015 are automatically exercised at vesting. Vested

share rights granted after July 2015 may be exercised at will up to a maximum of 15 years from their commencement date. For each

vested share right and each performance option exercised during the year, the relevant executive received one fully paid Westpac

ordinary share. The exercise price for share rights is zero.

4. For performance share rights, the value granted represents the number of securities granted multiplied by the fair value per instrument

as set out in the table in the sub-section titled ‘Fair value of Long Term Variable Reward awards made during the year’ below. For

restricted shares, the value granted represents the number of ordinary shares granted multiplied by the five day VWAP of a Westpac

ordinary share on the date the shares were granted. These values, which represent the full value of the equity-based awards made to

the CEO and Group Executives in 2019, do not reconcile with the amount shown in the table in section 7.2 which shows the amount

amortised in the current year of equity awards over their vesting period. The minimum total value of the grants for future financial years

is zero and an estimate of the maximum possible total value in future financial years is the fair value, as shown above.

5. The value of each option or share right exercised, forfeited or lapsed is calculated based on the five day VWAP of Westpac ordinary

shares on the date of exercise (or forfeiture or lapse), less the relevant exercise price (if any). Where the exercise price is greater than

the five day VWAP of Westpac ordinary shares, the value has been calculated as zero.

6. The information relates to the period the individual was a KMP. Refer to section 1 for further details.

7.3. Movement in equity-settled instruments during the year

The table shows the movements in the number and value of equity instruments for the CEO and Group Executives

under the relevant plan during 2019.

NameType of equity-based instrument

Number

granted

1

Number

vested

2

Number

exercised

3

Value

granted

4


$

Value

exercised

5


$

Value

forfeited or

lapsed

5


$

Managing Director & Chief Executive Officer

Brian HartzerCEO Performance share rights227,338 - - 3,350,962 - 3,176,443

Performance share rights- - - - - 910,932

Shares under the CEO Restricted

Share Plan41,867 43,914 - 1,034,352 - -

Current Group Executives

Craig Bright

6

Performance share rights77,696 - - 1,224,953 - -

Shares under Restricted Share Plan132,151 39,827 - 3,542,324 - -

Lyn CobleyPerformance share rights94,964 - - 1,399,769 - -

Shares under Restricted Share Plan18,724 17,817 - 462,589 - -

Peter KingPerformance share rights92,086 - - 1,357,348 - 1,749,043

Shares under Restricted Share Plan20,796 18,234 - 513,779 - -

Rebecca LimPerformance share rights62,948 - - 927,854 - 367,504

Shares under Restricted Share Plan14,340 17,343 - 354,279 - -

David LindbergPerformance share rights94,602 - - 1,398,440 - 784,008

Shares under Restricted Share Plan17,719 15,875 - 437,760 - -

Carolyn McCannPerformance share rights49,910 - - 735,673 - 376,943

Shares under Restricted Share Plan9,818 10,541 - 242,560 - -

David McLeanPerformance share rights84,630 - - 1,247,446 - 948,126

Unhurdled share rights22,059 13,351 - 502,783 - -

Christine ParkerPerformance share rights73,380 - - 1,081,621 - 1,413,548

Shares under Restricted Share Plan17,196 15,210 - 424,838 - -

David StephenPerformance share rights278,698 - - 4,461,892 - -

Shares under Restricted Share Plan135,929 15,727 - 3,644,447 - -

Gary ThursbyPerformance share rights76,438 - - 1,126,696 - 452,315

Shares under Restricted Share Plan15,909 13,296 - 393,042 - -

Alastair Welsh

6

Performance share rights- - - - - -

Shares under Restricted Share Plan4,223 - - 116,704 - -

Former Group Executive

Brad Cooper

6

Performance share rights94,424 - - 1,391,810 - 1,978,989

Shares under Restricted Share Plan16,090 24,004 - 397,514 - -

Dave Curran

6

Performance share rights- - - - - 1,688,745

Shares under Restricted Share Plan- 16,038 - - - -

George Frazis

6

Performance share rights89,928 - - 1,325,539 - 1,548,156

Shares under Restricted Share Plan19,308 26,518 - 477,017 - -

702019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Directors’ report

Fair value of Long Term Variable Reward awards made during the year

The table below provides a summary of the fair value of LTVR awards granted to the CEO and Group Executives

during 2019 calculated in accordance with AASB 2 Share-based Payment and is used for accounting purposes only.

LTVR awards will only vest if performance hurdles are achieved and service conditions are met in future years.

Plan nameGranted to

Performance

hurdleGrant date

Commencement

date

1

Test dateExpiry

Fair value

2

per

instrument

CEO Long Term

Variable Reward Plan

Brian HartzerRelative TSR12 December

2018

1 October 20181 October 20221 October 2033$10.45

Cash ROE12 December

2018

1 October 20181 October 20211 October 2033$19.03

Westpac Long Term

Variable Reward Plan

Group

Executives

Relative TSR12 December

2018

1 October 20181 October 20221 October 2033$10.45

Cash ROE12 December

2018

1 October 20181 October 20211 October 2033$19.03

7.4. Details of Westpac equity holdings of Non-executive Directors

The table below sets out details of relevant interests in Westpac ordinary shares held by Non-executive Directors

(including their related parties) during the year ended 30 September 2019

3

.

Number held atChangesNumber held at

Namestart of the yearduring the yearend of the year

Current Non-executive Directors

Lindsay Maxsted22,0951,58523,680

Nerida Caesar9,9853,59813,583

Ewen Crouch

4

82,264 - 82,264

Alison Deans14,392 - 14,392

Craig Dunn8,869 - 8,869

Anita Fung - - -

Steven Harker

5

n/a10,36511,930

Peter Marriott

6

41,072(2,001)39,071

Peter Nash8,020 - 8,020

Margaret Seale

5,7

n/a 1,068 37,439

Former Non-executive Director

Peter Hawkins

5

15,880-n/a

1. The commencement date is the start of the performance period.

2. The fair values of performance share rights granted during the year have been independently calculated at their respective grant

dates based on the requirements of AASB 2 Share-based Payment. The fair value of performance share rights with cash ROE hurdles

has been assessed with reference to the share price at grant date and a discount rate reflecting the expected dividend yield over

their vesting periods which for the performance share rights valued at $19.03 is four years to the 1 October 2022 vesting date. For

the purpose of allocating performance share rights with cash ROE hurdles, the valuation also takes into account the average cash

ROE outcome using a Monte Carlo pricing simulation model. The fair value of performance share rights with hurdles based on TSR

performance relative to that of a group of comparator companies also takes into account the average TSR outcome determined using a

Monte Carlo simulation pricing model.

3. Other than as disclosed below, no share interests include non-beneficially held shares.

4. Ewen Crouch holds 42,000 ordinary shares following the grant of probate in a deceased estate for which he is one of the executors. In

addition to holdings of ordinary shares, Ewen Crouch and his related parties held interests in 250 Westpac Capital Notes 2 at year end.

5. The information relates to the period the individual was a KMP. Refer to section 1 for further details.

6. Peter Marriott’s related party ceased to hold an interest in 2,001 ordinary shares following the realisation of assets in a deceased estate.

In addition to holdings of ordinary shares, Peter Marriott and his related parties held interests in 563 Westpac Capital Notes 2

at year end.

7. In addition to holding shares, Margaret Seale and her related parties held interests in 3,220 Westpac Capital Notes 2 at year end.

1. The highest number of shares held by an individual in the table is 0.0043% of total Westpac ordinary shares outstanding as at
30 September 2019.

2. The information relates to the period the individual was a KMP. Refer to section 1 for further details.

1

2

3

4

712019 Westpac Group Annual Report

Directors’ report

7.5. Details of Westpac equity holdings of Executive Key Management Personnel

The table below details Westpac equity held (and movement in that equity) by the CEO and Group Executives

(including their related parties) for the year ended 30 September 2019

1

.

Name

Type of equity-based

instrument

Number

held at

start of

the year

Number

granted

during the

year as

remuneration

Received

on exercise

and/or

exercised

during the

year

Number

forfeited

or lapsed

during the

year

Other

changes

during the

year

Number

held at end

of the year

Number

vested and

exercisable

at end of

the year

Managing Director & Chief Executive Officer

Brian HartzerOrdinary shares109,611 41,867 - - - 151,478 -

CEO Performance share

rights732,817 227,338 - (119,476)- 840,679 -

Performance share rights34,263 - - (34,263)- - -

Current Group Executives

Craig Bright

2

Ordinary sharesn/a132,151 - - - 132,151 -

Performance share rightsn/a77,696 - - - 77,696 -

Lyn CobleyOrdinary shares91,993 18,724 - - - 110,717 -

Performance share rights261,846 94,964 - - - 356,810 -

Peter King Ordinary shares97,791 20,796 - - - 118,587 -

Performance share rights314,259 92,086 - (65,787)- 340,558 -

Rebecca LimOrdinary shares30,876 14,340 - - - 45,216 -

Performance share rights144,092 62,948 - (13,823)- 193,217 -

David LindbergOrdinary shares64,952 17,719 - - - 82,671 -

Performance share rights254,369 94,602 - (29,489)- 319,482 -

Carolyn McCannOrdinary shares49,435 9,818 - - - 59,253 -

Performance share rights42,816 49,910 - (14,178)- 78,548 -

David McLeanOrdinary shares9,613 - - - - 9,613 -

Performance share rights237,918 84,630 - (35,662)- 286,886 2,148

Unhurdled share rights57,218 22,059 - - - 79,277 49,831

Christine ParkerOrdinary shares27,431 17,196 - - (15,000)29,627 -

Performance share rights240,311 73,380 - (53,168)- 260,523 -

David StephenOrdinary shares- 135,929 - - - 135,929 -

Performance share rights- 278,698 - - - 278,698 -

Gary ThursbyOrdinary shares92,445 15,909 - - - 108,354 -

Performance share rights154,553 76,438 - (17,013)- 213,978 -

Alastair Welsh

2

Ordinary sharesn/a4,223 - - (20,802)37,256 -

Performance share rightsn/a- - - - 14,944-

Former Group Executives

Brad Cooper

2

Ordinary shares131,982 16,090 - - - n/a-

Performance share rights329,216 94,424 - (74,436)- n/a-

Dave Curran

2

Ordinary shares49,425 - - - - n/a-

Performance share rights288,436 - - (63,519)- n/a-

George Frazis

2

Ordinary shares81,302 19,308 - - (10,000)n/a-

Performance share rights300,880 89,928 - (58,231)- n/a-

722019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Directors’ report

7.6. Loans to Non-executive Directors and Executive Key Management Personnel disclosures

Financial instrument transactions that occurred during the financial year between Directors, the CEO or Group

Executives and the Group are in the ordinary course of business on terms and conditions (including interest and

collateral) as they apply to other employees and certain customers. These transactions consisted principally of

normal personal banking and financial investment services.

The table below details loans to Non-executive Directors, the CEO and Group Executives (including their related

parties) of the Group.

Balance at start of

the year

$

Interest paid and

payable for the year

$

Interest not charged

during the year

$

Balance at end of

the year

$

Number in Group at

end of the year

Non-executive Directors3,544,610306,091 - 19,785,1624

CEO and Group Executives9,519,382366,076 - 11,932,84510

13,063,992672,167 - 31,718,00714

The table below details KMP (including their related parties) with loans above $100,000 during 2019.

Balance at start of

the year

$

Interest paid and

payable for the year

$

Interest not charged

during the year

$

Balance at end of

the year

$

Highest

indebtedness during

the year

$

Directors

Lindsay Maxsted1,572,88971,630 - 2,666,9792,666,979

Ewen Crouch979,94739,833 - 928,7811,479,947

Steven Harker

1

n/a158,722 - 15,000,00015,000,000

Peter Nash991,77435,906 - 1,189,4021,498,923

CEO and Group Executives

Brian Hartzer9,84715,572 - 806,470814,285

Lyn Cobley2,000,00085,800 - 2,000,0002,007,287

Brad Cooper

1

2,791,36073,973 - n/a3,097,569

Rebecca Lim732,84513,081 - 600,000778,035

Carolyn McCann145,0004,788 - 307,697440,001

David McLean620,84130,059 - 625,816672,004

Christine Parker1,308,48646,955 - 5,001,8665,436,523

David Stephen-3,112--672,755

Gary Thursby1,911,00373,462-1,864,7912,034,797

Alastair Welsh

1

n/a19,274 - 726,205726,205

1. The information relates to the period the individual was a KMP. Refer to section 1 for further details.

732019 Westpac Group Annual Report
1

2

3

4

Directors’ report

Directors’ report

11. Auditor

a) Auditor’s independence declaration

A copy of the auditor’s independence declaration as required under section 307C of the Corporations Act is below:


PricewaterhouseCoopers, ABN 52 780 433 757

One International Towers Sydney, Watermans Quay, Barangaroo NSW 2000, GPO BOX 2650 Sydney

NSW 2001

T: +61 2 8266 0000, F: +61 2 8266 9999, www.pwc.com.au,


Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.





Auditor’s Independence Declaration


As lead auditor for the audit of Westpac Banking Corporation for the year-ended 30

September 2019, I declare that to the best of my knowledge and belief, there have been:

(a) no contraventions of the auditor independence requirements of the

Corporations

Act 2001

in relation to the audit; and

(b) no contraventions of any applicable code of professional conduct in relation to the

audit.

This declaration is in respect of Westpac Banking Corporation and the entities it controlled

during the period.


Lona Mathis Sydney

Partner

PricewaterhouseCoopers


4 November 2019




742019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Directors’ report

b) Non-audit services

We may decide to engage PwC on assignments additional to their statutory audit duties where their expertise or

experience with Westpac or a controlled entity is important.

Details of the non-audit service amounts paid or payable to PwC for non-audit services provided during the 2018

and 2019 financial years are set out in Note 39 and Note 35 to the respective financial statements.

PwC also provides audit and non-audit services to non-consolidated entities, non-consolidated trusts of which a

Westpac Group entity is trustee, manager or responsible entity and non-consolidated superannuation funds or

pension funds. The fees in respect of these services were approximately $7.5 million in total (2018: $7.5 million).

PwC may also provide audit and non-audit services to other entities in which Westpac holds a minority interest and

which are not consolidated. Westpac is not aware of the amount of any fees paid to PwC by those entities.

Westpac has a policy on engaging PwC, details of which are set out in Westpac’s Corporate Governance Statement

and in the subsection entitled ‘Engagement of the external auditor’, which forms part of this Directors’ report.

The Board has considered the position and, in accordance with the advice received from the Board Audit

Committee, is satisfied that the provision of the non-audit services during 2019 by PwC is compatible with the

general standard of independence for auditors imposed by the Corporations Act. The Directors are satisfied, in

accordance with advice received from the Board Audit Committee, that the provision of non-audit services by

PwC, as set out above, did not compromise the auditor independence requirements of the Corporations Act for the

following reasons:

• all non-audit services provided by PwC for the year have been reviewed by the Board Audit Committee, which

is of the view that they do not impact the impartiality and objectivity of PwC; and

• based on Board quarterly independence declarations made by PwC to the Board Audit Committee during

the year, none of the services undermine the general principles relating to auditor independence including

reviewing or auditing PwC’s own work, acting in a management or a decision-making capacity for the company,

acting as advocate for the company or jointly sharing economic risk and rewards.

12. Responsibility statement

The Directors of Westpac Banking Corporation confirm that to the best of their knowledge:

• the consolidated financial statements for the financial year ended 30 September 2019, which have been

prepared in accordance with the accounting policies described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial

statements, being in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards (AAS), give a true and fair view of the

assets, liabilities, financial position and profit of the Group; and

• the Annual Report from the section entitled ‘Information on Westpac’ to and including the section entitled

‘Other Westpac business information’ includes a fair review of the information required by the Disclosure

Guidance and Transparency Rules 4.1.8R to 4.1.11R of the United Kingdom Financial Conduct Authority, together

with a description of the principal risks and uncertainties faced by the Group.

Signed in accordance with a resolution of the Board.


Lindsay Maxsted Brian Hartzer

Chairman Managing Director & Chief Executive Officer

4 November 2019 4 November 2019

Directors’ report

752019 Westpac Group Annual Report
1

2

3

4


1

2

3

4

Five year summary

Reading this report

Review of Group operations

Divisional performance

Risk and risk management

Westpac’s approach to sustainability

Other Westpac business information

02

762019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Five year summary

1

(in $m unless otherwise indicated)20192018201720162015

Income statements for the years ended 30 September

2

     

Net interest income16,907 16,505 15,516 15,148 14,267 

Net fee income1,655 2,424 2,603 2,611 2,808 

Net wealth management and insurance income1,029 2,061 1,800 1,899 2,228 

Trading income929 945 1,202 1,124 964 

Other income

129 72 529 59 1,241 

Net operating income before operating expenses and

impairment charges20,649 22,007 21,650 20,841 21,508 

Operating expenses(10,106)(9,566)(9,282)(9,073)(9,339)

Impairment charges

(794)(710)(853)(1,124)(753)

Profit before income tax9,749 11,731 11,515 10,644 11,416 

Income tax expense(2,959)(3,632)(3,518)(3,184)(3,348)

Profit attributable to non-controlling interests

(6)(4)(7)(15)(56)

Net profit attributable to owners of Westpac Banking Corporation6,784 8,095 7,990 7,445 8,012 

Balance sheet as at 30 September

2

     

Loans714,770 709,690 684,919 661,926 623,316 

Other assets191,856 169,902 166,956 177,276 188,840 

Total assets906,626 879,592 851,875 839,202 812,156 

Deposits and other borrowings563,247 559,285 533,591 513,071 475,328 

Debt issues181,457 172,596 168,356 169,902 171,054 

Loan capital21,826 17,265 17,666 15,805 13,840 

Other liabilities74,589 65,873 70,920 82,243 98,019 

Total liabilities841,119 815,019 790,533 781,021 758,241 

Total shareholders’ equity and non-controlling interests65,507 64,573 61,342 58,181 53,915 

Key financial ratios     

Shareholder value     

Dividends per ordinary share (cents)174 188 188 188 187 

Dividend payout ratio (%)

3

88.83 79.52 79.28 84.19 73.39 

Return on average ordinary equity (%)10.65 13.05 13.65 13.32 16.23 

Basic earnings per share (cents)196.5 237.5 238.0 224.6 255.0 

Net tangible assets per ordinary share ($)

4

15.36 15.39 14.66 13.90 13.02 

Share price ($):     

High30.05 33.68 35.39 33.74 40.07 

Low23.30 27.24 28.92 27.57 29.10 

Close29.64 27.93 31.92 29.51 29.70 

Business performance     

Operating expenses to operating income ratio (%)48.94 43.47 42.87 43.53 43.42 

Net interest margin (%)2.12 2.13 2.06 2.10 2.09 

Capital adequacy     

Total equity to total assets (%)7.2 7.3 7.2 6.9 6.6 

Total equity to total average assets (%)7.3 7.4 7.2 7.0  6.8 

APRA Basel III:     

Common equity Tier 1 (%)10.67 10.63 10.56 9.48 9.50 

Tier 1 ratio (%)12.84 12.78 12.66 11.17 11.38 

Total capital ratio (%)15.63 14.74 14.82 13.11 13.26 

Credit quality     

Net impaired assets to equity and collectively assessed provisions (%)1.41 1.14 1.29 1.79 1.80 

Total provisions for expected credit losses/impairment on loans and

credit commitments to total loans (basis points)

5

54 43 45 54 53 

Other information     

Full time equivalent employees (number at financial year end)

6

33,288 35,029 35,096 35,580 35,484 

1. Where accounting classifications have changed or where changes in accounting policy are adopted retrospectively, comparatives have

been restated and may differ from results previously reported.

2. The above income statement extracts for 2019, 2018 and 2017 and balance sheet extracts for 2019 and 2018 are derived from the

consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report. The above income statement extracts for 2016 and 2015 and balance

sheet extracts for 2017, 2016 and 2015 are derived from financial statements previously published.

3. Adjusted for Treasury shares.

4. Total equity attributable to owners of Westpac Banking Corporation, after deducting intangible assets divided by the number of

ordinary shares outstanding, less Treasury shares held.

5. Provisions for expected credit losses (ECL) for the 30 September 2019 year end have been determined based on AASB 9 Financial

Instruments (December 2014) (AASB 9). Comparatives based on AASB 139 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement (AASB

139) have not been restated. Refer to Note 1 and Note 13 to the financial statements for further details.

6. Full-time equivalent employees include full-time, pro-rata part-time, overtime, temporary and contract staff.

Five year summary

1

772019 Westpac Group Annual Report
1

2

3

4

Reading this report

1

2

3

4

Reading this report

Disclosure regarding forward-looking statements

This Annual Report contains statements that constitute ‘forward-looking statements’ within the meaning of

Section 21E of the US Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Forward-looking statements are statements about matters that are not historical facts. Forward-looking statements

appear in a number of places in this Annual Report and include statements regarding Westpac’s intent, belief

or current expectations with respect to its business and operations, market conditions, results of operations

and financial condition, including, without limitation, future loan loss provisions and financial support to certain

borrowers. Words such as ‘will’, ‘may’, ‘expect’, ‘intend’, ‘seek’, ‘would’, ‘should’, ‘could’, ‘continue’, ‘plan’, ‘estimate’,

‘anticipate’, ‘believe’, ‘probability’, ‘risk’, ‘aim’ or other similar words are used to identify forward-looking statements.

These forward-looking statements reflect Westpac’s current views with respect to future events and are subject to

change, certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions which are, in many instances, beyond Westpac’s control, and

have been made based upon management’s expectations and beliefs concerning future developments and their

potential effect upon Westpac. There can be no assurance that future developments will be in accordance with

Westpac’s expectations or that the effect of future developments on Westpac will be those anticipated. Actual

results could differ materially from those expected, depending on the outcome of various factors, including, but

not limited to:

• the effect of, and changes in, laws, regulations, taxation or accounting standards or practices and government

policy, particularly changes to liquidity, leverage and capital requirements;

• regulatory investigations and other actions, inquiries, litigation, fines, penalties, restrictions or other regulator

imposed conditions, including as a result of our actual or alleged failure to comply with laws (such as financial

crime laws), regulations or regulatory policy;

• internal and external events which may adversely impact Westpac’s reputation;

• information security breaches, including cyberattacks;

• reliability and security of Westpac’s technology and risks associated with changes to technology systems;

• the stability of Australian and international financial systems and disruptions to financial markets and any losses

or business impacts Westpac or its customers or counterparties may experience as a result;

• market volatility, including uncertain conditions in funding, equity and asset markets;

• adverse asset, credit or capital market conditions;

• an increase in defaults in credit exposures because of a deterioration in economic conditions;

• the conduct, behaviour or practices of Westpac or its staff;

• changes to Westpac’s credit ratings or the methodology used by credit rating agencies;

• levels of inflation, interest rates (including low or negative rates), exchange rates and market and monetary

fluctuations;

• market liquidity and investor confidence;

• changes in economic conditions, consumer spending, saving and borrowing habits in Australia, New Zealand

and other countries (including as a result of tariffs and protectionist trade measures) in which Westpac or its

customers or counterparties conduct their operations and Westpac’s ability to maintain or to increase market

share, margins and fees, and control expenses;

• the effects of competition, including from established providers of financial services and from non-financial

services entities, in the geographic and business areas in which Westpac conducts its operations;

• the timely development and acceptance of new products and services and the perceived overall value of these

products and services by customers;

• the effectiveness of Westpac’s risk management policies, including internal processes, systems and employees;

• the incidence or severity of Westpac-insured events;

• the occurrence of environmental change (including as a result of climate change) or external events in countries

in which Westpac or its customers or counterparties conduct their operations;

• changes to the value of Westpac’s intangible assets;

• changes in political, social or economic conditions in any of the major markets in which Westpac or its

customers or counterparties operate;

• the success of strategic decisions involving diversification or innovation, in addition to business expansion

activity, business acquisitions and the integration of new businesses; and

• various other factors beyond Westpac’s control.

The above list is not exhaustive. For certain other factors that may impact on forward-looking statements made

by Westpac, refer to ‘Risk factors’ under the section ‘Risk and risk management’. When relying on forward-looking

statements to make decisions with respect to Westpac, investors and others should carefully consider the

foregoing factors and other uncertainties and events.

Westpac is under no obligation to update any forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report,

whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, after the date of this Annual Report.

782019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Reading this report

Significant developments

For a discussion of significant developments impacting the Group, refer to ‘Significant developments’ under

‘Information on Westpac’ in Section 1.

Currency of presentation, exchange rates and certain definitions

In this Annual Report, ‘financial statements’ means our audited consolidated balance sheets as at 30 September 2019

and 30 September 2018 and income statements, statements of comprehensive income, changes in equity and cash

flows for each of the years ended 30 September 2019, 2018 and 2017 together with accompanying notes which are

included in this Annual Report.

Our financial year ends on 30 September. As used throughout this Annual Report, the financial year ended

30 September 2019 is referred to as 2019 and other financial years are referred to in a corresponding manner.

We publish our consolidated financial statements in Australian dollars. In this Annual Report, unless otherwise

stated or the context otherwise requires, references to ‘dollars’, ‘dollar amounts’, ‘$’, ‘AUD’ or ‘A$’ are to Australian

dollars, references to ‘US$’, ‘USD’ or ‘US dollars’ are to United States dollars and references to ‘NZ$’, ‘NZD’ or

‘NZ dollars’ are to New Zealand dollars. Solely for the convenience of the reader, certain Australian dollar

amounts have been translated into US dollars at a specified rate. These translations should not be construed as

representations that the Australian dollar amounts actually represent such US dollar amounts or have been or

could be converted into US dollars at the rate indicated. Unless otherwise stated, the translations of Australian

dollars into US dollars have been made at the rate of A$1.00 = US$0.6746, the noon buying rate in New York City

for cable transfers in Australian dollars as certified for customs purposes by the Federal Reserve Bank of New

York (the ‘noon buying rate’) as of Monday, 30 September 2019. The Australian dollar equivalent of New Zealand

dollars at 30 September 2019 was A$1.00 = NZ$1.0790, being the closing spot exchange rate on that date. Refer to

‘Exchange rates’ in Section 4 for information regarding the rates of exchange between the Australian dollar and the

US dollar for the financial years ended 30 September 2015 to 30 September 2019.

Any discrepancies between totals and sums of components in tables contained in this Annual Report are due to

rounding.

Reading this report

792019 Westpac Group Annual Report
1

2

3

4

Review of Group operations

1

2

3

4

Selected consolidated financial and operating data

We have derived the following selected financial information as of, and for the financial years ended, 30 September

2019, 2018, 2017, 2016 and 2015 from our audited consolidated financial statements and related notes.

This information should be read together with our audited consolidated financial statements and the accompanying

notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report.

Accounting standards

The financial statements and other financial information included elsewhere in this Annual Report, unless otherwise

indicated, have been prepared and presented in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards (AAS).

Compliance with AAS ensures that the financial statements also comply with International Financial Reporting

Standards (IFRS) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB).

The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the accounting policies described in the Notes to

the financial statements.

Recent accounting developments

For a discussion of recent accounting developments refer to Note 1 to the financial statements.

Critical accounting estimates

Our reported results are sensitive to the accounting policies, assumptions and estimates that underlie the

preparation of the income statement and the balance sheet. Note 1(b) includes details of the areas of our critical

accounting assumptions and estimates and a reference to the relevant note in the financial statements providing

further information. Each of the assumptions and estimates have been discussed at our Board Audit Committee

(BAC). The following is a summary of the areas involving our most critical accounting estimates.

Provisions (other than loan impairment charges)

Provisions are held in respect of a range of obligations such as employee entitlements, litigation and non-lending

losses, impairment charges on credit commitments, surplus lease space, restructuring costs and compliance,

regulation and remediation provisions. Some of the provisions involve significant judgement about the likely

outcome of various events and estimated future cash flows. Refer to Note 27.

Provisions for expected credit losses (ECL)/impairment charges on loans

Provisions for ECL are a probability-weighted estimate of the cash shortfalls expected to result from defaults over

the relevant timeframe. They are determined by evaluating a range of possible outcomes and taking into account

the time value of money, past events, current conditions and forecasts of future economic conditions.

The models use three main components to determine the ECL (as well as the time value of money) including:

• Probability of default (PD): the probability that a counterparty will default;

• Loss given default (LGD): the loss that is expected to arise in the event of a default; and

• Exposure at default (EAD): the estimated outstanding amount of credit exposure at the time of the default.

The provisions for ECL are determined based on three stages as follows:

Stage 1: 12 months ECL - performing

For financial assets where there has been no significant increase in credit risk since origination a provision for

12 months ECL is recognised.

Stage 2: Lifetime ECL - performing

For financial assets where there has been a significant increase in credit risk since origination but where the asset is

still performing a provision for lifetime ECL is recognised.

Stage 3: Lifetime ECL – non-performing

For financial assets that are non-performing a provision for lifetime ECL is recognised. Indicators include a breach

of contract with the Group such as a default on interest or principal payments, a borrower experiencing significant

financial difficulties or observable economic conditions that correlate to defaults on a group of loans.

Determining when a financial asset has experienced a significant increase in credit risk since origination is a critical

accounting judgement which is primarily based on changes in internal customer risk grades since origination of

the facility. The change in the internal customer risk grade that the Group uses to represent a significant increase

in credit risk is based on a sliding scale. This means that a higher credit quality exposure at origination would

require a more significant downgrade compared to a lower credit quality exposure before it is considered to have

experienced a significant increase in credit risk.

Interest income is calculated based on the gross carrying amount of financial assets in stages 1 and 2 of the Group’s

ECL model and on the carrying amount net of the provision for ECL for financial assets in stage 3.

The measurement of ECL for each stage and the assessment of significant increase in credit risk consider

information about past events and current conditions as well as reasonable and supportable projections of future

events and economic conditions. The estimation of forward looking information is a critical accounting judgement.

The Group considers three future macroeconomic scenarios including a base case scenario along with upside and

downside scenarios.

Review of Group operations

802019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Review of Group operations

The macroeconomic variables used in these scenarios, based on current economic forecasts, include (but are not

limited to) unemployment rates, real gross domestic product growth rates and residential and commercial property

price indices.

The macroeconomic scenarios are weighted based on the Group’s best estimate of the relative likelihood of each

scenario. The weighting applied to each of the three macroeconomic scenarios takes into account historical

frequency, current trends, and forward looking conditions.

As at 30 September 2019, gross loans to customers were $718,378 million (2018: $712,504 million) and the provision

for ECL/impairment charges on loans was $3,608 million (2018: $2,814 million)

1

.

Fair value of financial instruments

Financial instruments classified as held-for-trading (including derivatives) are measured at fair value through

income statement. Investment securities measured at fair value through other comprehensive income

(AASB 9)/available-for-sale (AASB 139)

2

are also recognised in the financial statements at fair value. As much as

possible, financial instruments are valued with reference to quoted, observable market prices or by using models

which employ observable valuation parameters. Where valuation models rely on parameters for which inputs are

not observable, judgements and estimation may be required.

As at 30 September 2019, the fair value of trading securities and financial assets measured at fair value

through profit or loss, investment securities measured at fair value through other comprehensive income

(2019) / available-for-sale securities (2018), loans designated at fair value and life insurance assets was

$113,989 million (2018: $94,247 million). The fair value of deposits and other borrowings at fair value, other financial

liabilities at fair value, debt issues at fair value and life insurance liabilities was $56,979 million (2018: $56,427 million).

The fair value of outstanding derivatives was a net asset of $763 million (2018: $306 million net liability). The fair

value of financial assets and financial liabilities determined by valuation models that use unobservable market prices

was $399 million (2018: $964 million) and $29 million (2018: $6 million), respectively. The fair value of financial assets

and financial liabilities, including derivatives, is largely determined based on valuation models using observable

market prices and rates. Where observable market inputs are not available, day one profits or losses are not

recognised.

We believe that the judgements and estimates used are reasonable in the current market. However, a change in

these judgements and estimates would lead to different results as future market conditions can vary from those

expected.

Goodwill

Goodwill represents the excess of purchase consideration, the amount of any non-controlling interest in the

acquiree and the acquisition date fair value of any previous equity interest in the acquiree, over the fair value of

the identified net assets of acquired businesses. The determination of the fair value of the assets and liabilities of

acquired businesses requires the exercise of management judgement. Different fair values would result in changes

to the goodwill and to the post-acquisition performance of the acquisitions.

Goodwill is tested for impairment annually by determining if the carrying value of the cash-generating unit (CGU)

that it has been allocated to is recoverable. The recoverable amount is the higher of the CGU’s fair value less

costs to sell and its value-in-use. Determination of appropriate cash flows and discount rates for the calculation

of the value in use is subjective. As at 30 September 2019, the carrying value of goodwill was $8,895 million

(2018: $8,890 million).

Superannuation obligations

The actuarial valuation of our defined benefit plan obligations are dependent upon a series of assumptions, the

key ones being price inflation, salary growth, mortality, morbidity, discount rate and investment returns. Different

assumptions could significantly alter the amount of the difference between plan assets and defined benefit

obligations and the amount recognised directly in retained profits.

The net superannuation deficit across all our plans as at 30 September 2019 was $335 million (2018: net

superannuation surplus of $64 million). As at 30 September 2019, one superannuation plan was in surplus

of $73 million (2018: two plans in surplus of $89 million) and three superannuation plans were in deficit of

$408 million (2018: two plans in deficit of $25 million).

Income taxes

The Group is subject to income taxes in Australia and jurisdictions where it has foreign operations. All our

businesses predominantly operate in jurisdictions with similar tax rates to the Australian corporate tax rate.

Significant judgement is required in determining the worldwide provision for income taxes. There are many

transactions and calculations undertaken during the ordinary course of business for which the ultimate tax

determination is uncertain. For these circumstances, we hold appropriate provisions. Where the final outcome of

these matters is different from the amounts that were initially recorded, such differences will impact the current

and deferred tax provisions in the period where such determination is made.

Life insurance contract liabilities

The actuarial valuation of life insurance contract liabilities and associated deferred policy acquisition costs are

dependent upon a number of assumptions. The key factors impacting the valuation of these liabilities and related

assets are the cost of providing benefits and administering the contracts, mortality and morbidity experience,

discontinuance experience and the rate at which projected future cash flows are discounted.

Review of Group operations

1. The provision for ECL on loans relates to the 30 September 2019 year end balance determined under AASB 9. The provision for

impairment charges on loans related to the 2018 year end balance determined under AASB 139.

2. On adoption of AASB 9, the majority of available-for-sale securities were reclassified to Investment securities measured at fair value

through other comprehensive income (FVOCI). Refer to Note 1 to the financial statements for more details.

812019 Westpac Group Annual Report
1

2

3

4

Review of Group operations

1

2

3

4

Income statement review

Consolidated income statement

1


For the years ending 30 September201920192018201720162015

(in $m unless otherwise indicated)US$

2

A$A$A$A$A$

Interest income22,412 33,222 32,571 31,232 31,822 32,295 

Interest expense(11,007)(16,315)(16,066)(15,716)(16,674)(18,028)

Net interest income11,405 16,907 16,505 15,516 15,148 14,267 

Net fee income1,116 1,655 2,424 2,603 2,611 2,808 

Net wealth management and insurance income694 1,029 2,061 1,800 1,899 2,228 

Trading income627 929 945 1,202 1,124 964 

Other income88 129 72 529 59 1,241 

Net operating income before operating expenses and

impairment charges13,930 20,649 22,007 21,650 20,841 21,508 

Operating expenses(6,817)(10,106)(9,566)(9,282)(9,073)(9,339)

Impairment charges(536)(794)(710)(853)(1,124)(753)

Profit before income tax6,577 9,749 11,731 11,515 10,644 11,416 

Income tax expense(1,996)(2,959)(3,632)(3,518)(3,184)(3,348)

Net profit for the year4,581 6,790 8,099 7,997 7,460 8,068 

Net profit attributable to non-controlling interests(5)(6)(4)(7)(15)(56)

Net profit attributable to owners of Westpac Banking

Corporation4,576 6,784 8,095 7,990 7,445 8,012 

Weighted average number of ordinary shares (millions)3,450 3,450 3,406 3,355 3,313 3,140 

Basic earnings per ordinary share (cents)132.6 196.5 237.5 238.0 224.6 255.0 

Diluted earnings per share (cents)

3

127.8 189.5 230.1 229.3 217.8 248.2 

Dividends per ordinary share (cents)117174188 188 188 187 

Dividend payout ratio (%)

4

88.83 88.83  79.52 79.28 84.19 73.39 

Overview of performance – 2019 v 2018

During 2019, Westpac adopted AASB 9 Financial Instruments (AASB 9) and AASB 15 Revenue from Contracts with

Customers (AASB 15). As the Group chose to apply the standards prospectively, comparatives have not been restated.

Adopting the new standards has resulted in measurement and classification differences between 2019 and prior

years. The significant differences are:

• the measurement of credit loss provision and impairment charges are now on an expected loss basis;

• line fees (mainly in Business) are now recognised in net interest income, previously most was recognised in net

fee income;

• interest on performing loans is now measured on the gross loan value. Previously, interest was recognised on

the loan balance net of impairment provision; and

• certain items previously netted are now presented on a gross basis, including payments from credit card

schemes which were previously netted against related expenditure.

The changes have little impact on net profit but a more significant impact on individual line items. As these

changes have only been applied from 1 October 2018, it is difficult to compare some line items across years. These

changes are discussed further in Section 3, Note 1.

Net profit attributable to owners of Westpac Banking Corporation for 2019 was $6,784 million, a decrease of

$1,311 million or 16% compared to 2018. 2019 included significant increases in provisions for estimated customer

refunds, payments, associated costs, and litigation, along with costs associated with restructuring of the wealth

business, which together reduced net profit after tax by $1,130 million. These items are discussed further in Note

27 to the financial statements. A summary of the impact of provisions for estimated customer refunds, payments,

associated costs, and litigation and wealth restructuring costs split across income statement line items is shown in

the ‘Divisional performance’ section.

Net interest income increased $402 million or 2% compared to 2018 driven by an increase of $686 million due to

the reclassification of line fees from net fee income to interest income, partly offset by $239 million increase in

provisions for estimated customer refunds, payments, associated costs, and litigation. Excluding the impact of

these items, net interest income was flat compared to 2018. Average interest earning assets grew 3% primarily from

Australian and New Zealand housing, offset by a lower margin. Reported net interest margin decreased 1 basis

point to 2.12%.

1. Where accounting classifications have changed or where changes in accounting policy are adopted retrospectively, comparatives have

been restated and may differ from results previously reported.

2. Australian dollar amounts have been translated into US dollars solely for the convenience of the reader at the rate of A$1.00 = US$0.6746

(refer to ‘Reading this report’ section).

3. Based on basic earnings per share, with the weighted average number of fully paid ordinary shares outstanding adjusted for the conversion of

dilutive potential ordinary shares, issued for no consideration, and after adjusting earnings for distributions on dilutive potential ordinary shares.

4. Adjusted for Treasury shares.

822019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Review of Group operations

Net fee income decreased $769 million or 32% compared to 2018 primarily due to the reclassification of line fees to

net interest income ($667 million in 2018) and $126 million increase in provisions for estimated customer refunds,

payments, associated costs and litigation.

Net wealth management and insurance income decreased $1,032 million or 50% compared to 2018 primarily

due to additional provisions for estimated customer refunds, payments, associated costs, and litigation of $531

million, higher general insurance claims from severe weather events $69 million, cessation of grandfathered advice

commissions $42 million, lower wealth management income due to changes in platform pricing structure, and exit

of the Hastings business in 2018.

Trading income decreased $16 million or 2% compared to 2018. The decline mainly relates to a change in

methodology in derivative valuation adjustments partially offset by higher non-customer income.

Other income is up $57 million or 79% compared to 2018, primarily due to the non-repeat of a 2018 impairment

charge on an equity holding of $104 million.

Operating expenses increased $540 million or 6% compared to 2018. The increase was mainly due to a $349

million increase in provisions for estimated customer refunds, payments, associated costs, and litigation and wealth

reset, higher technology expenses of $174 million, a rise in regulatory, compliance and investment related spend

of $170 million, partially offset by the exit of the Hastings business in 2018 of $158 million and a net productivity

benefit.

Impairment charges were $84 million or 12% higher compared to 2018. Asset quality remained sound, with stressed

exposures as a percentage of total committed exposures at 1.20%, up 12 basis points over the year.

The effective tax rate of 30.4% in 2019 was lower than the 2018 effective tax rate of 31.0%. The lower effective tax

rate in 2019 reflects a decrease in non-deductible expenses from the non-repeat of the 2018 goodwill write-off

associated with the exit of Hastings.

The Board has determined a final dividend of 80 cents per ordinary share. The full year ordinary dividends of 174

cents is lower than the ordinary dividends declared in 2018 and represents a pay-out ratio of 88.83%. The full year

ordinary dividend is fully franked.

Income statement review – 2019 v 2018

Net interest income – 2019 v 2018

$m201920182017

Interest income33,222 32,571 31,232 

Interest expense(16,315)(16,066)(15,716)

Net interest income16,907 16,505 15,516 

Increase/(decrease) in net interest income   

Due to change in volume397 648 855 

Due to change in rate5 341 (487)

Change in net interest income402

 989 368 

Net interest income increased $402 million or 2% compared to 2018. Key features include:

• 3% growth in average interest-earning assets, primarily from Australian and New Zealand housing and higher

third party liquids;

• Group net interest margin decreased 1 basis point to 2.12%. Refer to Interest spread and margin – 2019 v 2018 for

primary drivers of margin movement.

832019 Westpac Group Annual Report
1

2

3

4

Review of Group operations

1

2

3

4

Loans increased $5.1 billion or 1% compared to 2018. Excluding foreign currency translation impacts, loans

increased $2.9 billion.

Key features of loan growth were:

• Australian housing loans increased $4.5 billion or 1% with $60.6 billion of new lending partially offset by

$56.1 billion of run off. Owner occupied balances grew 3% and comprised 58% of the portfolio, while investor

property lending decreased 1%;

• Australian personal loans decreased $1.8 billion or 8%, across personal lending, credit cards and auto finance.

Demand for unsecured lending continued to decline in 2019 with our experience in line with the market;

• Australian business and institutional loans decreased $2.0 billion or 1%, mostly due to lower institutional

property lending as divisions prioritised returns over growth, partially offset by growth in agricultural lending;

• Australian provision balances increased $0.8 billion or 32% at the start of the year mostly from the

implementation of AASB 9 on 1 October 2018 , which calculates credit loss provisioning on an expected loss

basis; and

• New Zealand lending increased A$4.4 billion or 6%. Housing loans grew 7%, mostly in fixed rate products and

business lending increased 6%, supported by growth in agricultural, and property lending. This was partially

offset by a decline personal lending and credit cards.

Deposits and other borrowings excluding certificates of deposit increased $6.8 billion or 1% compared to 2018.

Excluding foreign currency translation impacts, deposits and other borrowings excluding certificates of deposit

increased $4.7 billion.

Key features of deposits and other borrowings excluding certificates of deposit growth were:

• Australian deposits and other borrowings excluding certificates of deposit increased $2.4 billion or 1%, mostly

from an increase in savings and transactional deposits, partially offset by a reduction in term deposits. Non-

interest bearing deposits were up 4% from increased mortgage offset balances; and

• New Zealand deposits and other borrowings excluding certificates of deposit increased A$3.1 billion or 5%,

as term deposits were up 4% and interest bearing transactional deposits were up 12%. Non-interest bearing

deposits increased 18%, from growth in business and consumer transactional deposits.

Certificates of deposit decreased $2.8 billion or 7%, reflecting reduced short-term wholesale funding issuance in

this form.

Interest spread and margin – 2019 v 2018

$m201920182017

Group   

Net interest income16,907 16,505 15,516 

Average interest earning assets798,924 774,944 752,294 

Average interest bearing liabilities734,282 715,509 694,924 

Average net non-interest bearing assets, liabilities and equity64,642 59,435 57,370 

Interest spread

1

1.94% 1.95% 1.89%

Benefit of net non-interest bearing assets, liabilities and equity

2

0.18% 0.18% 0.17%

Net interest margin

3

2.12% 2.13% 2.06%

Group net interest margin of 2.12% decreased 1 basis point from 2018. Key features include:

• Provisions for estimated customer refunds, payments, associated costs, and litigation contributed to a reduction

in margin of 3 basis points;

• 11 basis points increase from the adoption of AASB 15 and AASB 9 primarily related to the reclassification of line

fees from net fee income to net interest income and the measurement of interest on performing loans based on

the gross loan value; and

• Except for these items, net interest margin decreased 9 basis points driven by:

• Changes in short term wholesale funding rates having little impact with the average cost being similar in 2018

and 2019 despite the sharp reduction in bank bill swap rate (BBSW) in the second half of 2019;

• Loan spreads were little changed, with the impact from changes to pricing of Australian variable mortgages

being offset by competition, retention pricing and changes in the mix of the mortgage portfolio with

customers switching from interest only to principal and interest;

• 2 basis point decrease from lower customer deposit spreads due to broad based competition and the impact

from lower interest rates, particularly in the second half of 2019; and

• 2 basis point decrease from liquidity primarily due to increased balances of third party liquid assets.

• Treasury & Markets contribution decreased 5 basis points due to lower Treasury revenue from interest rate

risk management (3 basis points), and fair value adjustments (2 basis points).

1. Interest spread is the difference between the average yield on all interest earning assets and the average yield on all interest bearing

liabilities.

2. The benefit of net non-interest bearing assets, liabilities and equity is determined by applying the average yield paid on all interest

bearing liabilities to the average level of net non-interest bearing funds as a percentage of average interest earning assets.

3. Net interest margin is calculated by dividing net interest income by average interest earning assets.

842019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Review of Group operations

Non-interest income - 2019 v 2018

$m201920182017

Net fee income1,655 2,424 2,603 

Net wealth management and insurance income1,029 2,061 1,800 

Trading income929 945 1,202 

Other income129 72 529 

Non-interest income3,742 5,502 6,134 

Non-interest income decreased $1,760 million or 32% compared to 2018. Key features include:

• $657 million decrease from provisions for estimated customer refunds, payments, associated costs, and

litigation;

• $508 million decrease from the adoption of AASB 15 primarily related to the reclassification of line fees from

net fee income to net interest income ($667 million) and reclassification of certain items previously netted that

are now presented on a gross basis (up $159 million);

• Exit of Hastings business in 2018 ($203 million); and

• Except for these items, non-interest income decreased by $392 million due to reduced net wealth management

and insurance income and lower trading income.

Net fee income decreased $769 million or 32%, including $126 million additional provisions for estimated customer

refunds, payments, associated costs, and litigation mostly related to financial planning, reclassification of line fees

from non-interest income to net interest income as a result of the adoption of AASB 15 to more appropriately

reflect the relationship with drawn lines of credit (down $667 million) and the reclassification of certain items

previously netted that are now presented on a gross basis including card scheme support payments (up $153

million).

Except for these items, net fee income decreased $129 million or 6% mainly from:

• Lower advice income following the exit of financial planning (down $76 million);

• Lower revenue from payments and transaction fees (down $34 million) driven by increased merchant costs and

lower account based fees in New Zealand following the decision to simplify certain consumer fees; and

• A decrease in business lending and mortgage fees largely due to reduced new lending volumes (down

$27 million); partly offset by

• Higher corporate and institutional lending fees largely from syndication fees generated in the first half of 2019

(up $10 million).

Net wealth management and insurance income decreased $1,032 million or 50% compared to 2018, including

additional provisions for estimated customer refunds, payments, associated costs, and litigation (mostly related to

financial planning) of $531 million. Additionally, there was no contribution from Hastings, following the exit of the

business in 2018 (down $203 million).

Except for these items, net wealth management and insurance income decreased $298 million, mainly from:

• Insurance income decreased $139 million from:

–A reduction in general insurance income (down $69 million) from higher claims, including the New South

Wales hailstorm and Queensland floods;

–A reduction in life insurance income (down $39 million) following the implementation of regulatory reforms

(“Protect Your Super”) and higher claims and movement in policyholder tax recoveries (down $23 million); and

–Lower LMI income (down $8 million) primarily from a reduction in loans written at higher LVR bands.

• Lower Platforms and Superannuation income (down $98 million) primarily driven by margin compression from

full year impact of platform repricing, implementation of regulatory reforms (‘Protect your Super’), product mix

changes and outflows in legacy platforms. This has been partly offset by an 89% increase in BT Panorama funds

to $23 billion due to inflows and higher asset markets; and

• Cessation of grandfathered commission payments (down $42 million).

Trading income decreased $16 million or 2% compared to 2018, primarily driven by the derivative valuation

adjustment (down $78 million) partially offset by higher non-customer income.

Other income increased $57 million or 79% compared to 2018, reflecting the impairment loss on the remaining

Pendal shares in 2018 that did not repeat ($104 million), higher gains from asset sales and revaluation of a Fintech

investment ($98 million), partially offset by loss on financial instruments measured at fair value ($100 million), lower

rental income from operating leases ($35 million) and the impact of hedging future earnings (down $19 million).

852019 Westpac Group Annual Report
1

2

3

4

Review of Group operations

1

2

3

4

Operating expenses – 2019 v 2018

$m201920182017

Staff expenses5,0384,887 4,701 

Occupancy expenses1,023 1,033 1,073 

Technology expenses2,3192,110 2,008 

Other expenses1,7261,536 1,500 

Total operating expenses10,106 9,566 9,282 

Total operating expenses to net operating income ratio48.94% 43.47% 42.87%

Operating expenses increased $540 million or 6% compared to 2018. Key features include:

• increased costs associated with the Wealth Reset ($241 million higher);

• estimated costs associated with implementing customer refunds and payments and litigation ($108 million

higher);

• an increase due to the reclassification of $238 million predominantly related to merchant and card schemes

from non-interest income to operating expenses; and

• reduced costs from the exit of the Hastings business ($158 million).

Except for these items, operating expenses increased $111 million, primarily driven by regulatory and compliance

costs ($99 million higher) and investment related spend ($71 million higher) with productivity offsetting underlying

cost growth.

Staff expenses increased $151 million or 3% compared to 2018. This was due to costs associated with the Wealth

Reset and estimated costs associated with implementing customer refunds and payments and litigation ($231

million higher). Except for these items, staff expenses decreased $80 million primarily due to a 5% decrease in

FTE from productivity initiatives related to organisation simplification and channel optimisation along with lower

variable reward. This was partly offset by annual salary increases and the Group’s investment programs having a

higher proportion of spend expensed during the year.

Occupancy expenses decreased $10 million or 1% compared to 2018, driven by the reduction in branch numbers

(down 61), the exit of 4 corporate sites and the removal of 375 ATMs. This was partly offset by annual rental

increases and costs associated with branch and ATM rationalisation.

Technology expenses increased $209 million or 10%. This was due to costs associated with the Wealth Reset

and estimated costs associated with implementing customer refunds and payments and litigation ($35 million

higher). Except for these items, technology expenses increased $174 million largely due to higher amortisation of

software assets ($91 million higher) as key platforms became operational, including the Customer Service Hub, New

Payments Platform and Panorama.

Other expenses increased $190 million or 12%. This was due to costs associated with the Wealth Reset and

estimated costs associated with implementing customer refunds and payments and litigation ($83 million higher).

Except for these items, expenses increased $107 million from increased professional services costs primarily related

to regulatory and compliance activity on Financial Crime, data privacy, product and system simplification and risk

management, and higher marketing expenses, partly offset by lower costs associated with the exit of Hastings

business ($111 million lower) and the Royal Commission

862019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Review of Group operations

Impairment charges – 2019 v 2018

$m201920182017

Impairment charges794 710 853 

Impairment charges to average gross loans (basis points)

11 10 13 

Asset quality remained sound through 2019 with stressed exposures to total committed exposures increasing by

12 basis points to 1.20%. The increase in stressed exposures was due to higher impaired and higher 90+ days but

not impaired facilities. Emerging stress is mostly from an increase in mortgage delinquencies due to the softening

of economic activity and falling house prices.

Given modest change in asset quality, impairment charges have remained low at $794 million in 2019, equal to

11 basis points of gross loans.

Impairment charges for 2019 of $794 million were up $84 million when compared to 2018.

Key movements included:

• The introduction of AASB9 required the removal of the recognition of the time value of money on performing

collective provisions which contributed $115 million increase in impairment charges; and

• Write-offs, included in non-performing provisions, were $95 million higher principally in Australian unsecured

lending portfolios including Auto finance and from increases in customers utilising hardship; partially offset by

• Non performing provisions relating to new individually assessed provisions (IAPs) were $28 million lower due to

lower provisions required in the Business division and New Zealand, partially offset by an increase in WIB; and

• A higher economic overlay release of $96 million 2019 (2018: $22 million). Refer to Note 13.

Income tax expense – 2019 v 2018

$m201920182017

Income tax expense2,959 3,632 3,518 

Tax as a percentage of profit before income tax expense (effective tax rate)30.35% 30.96% 30.55%

The effective tax rate of 30.4% in 2019 was lower than the 2018 effective tax rate of 31.0%. The lower effective

tax rate in 2019 reflects a decrease in non-deductible expenses which included penalties and the non-repeat of

the 2018 write-off of the Hastings goodwill associated with the exit of that business which was non-deductible.

The effective tax rate above the Australian corporate tax rate of 30% reflects several Tier 1 Instruments whose

distributions are not deductible for Australian taxation purposes.

872019 Westpac Group Annual Report
1

2

3

4

Review of Group operations

1

2

3

4

Balance sheet review

Selected consolidated balance sheet data

1

The detailed components of the balance sheet are set out in the notes to the financial statements.

201920192018201720162015

As at 30 September US$m

2

A$mA$mA$mA$mA$m

Cash and balances with central banks13,532 20,059 26,788 18,786 17,397 15,135 

Collateral paid4,000 5,930 4,787 5,716 8,205 8,137 

Trading securities and financial assets measured at

fair value through income statement and investment

securities/available-for-sale securities70,956 105,182 84,251 86,693 82,841 83,231 

Derivative financial instruments20,143 29,859 24,101 24,033 32,227 48,173 

Loans482,184 714,770 709,690 684,919 661,926 623,316 

Life insurance assets6,319 9,367 9,450 10,643 14,192 13,125 

All other assets14,476 21,459 20,525 21,085 22,414 21,039 

Total assets611,610 906,626 879,592 851,875 839,202 812,156 

Collaterial received2,217 3,287 2,184 2,477 1,784 4,045 

Deposits and other borrowings379,966 563,247 559,285 533,591 513,071 475,328 

Other financial liabilities19,708 29,215 28,105 30,799 28,704 30,671 

Derivative financial instruments19,628 29,096 24,407 25,375 36,076 48,304 

Debt issues122,411 181,457 172,596 168,356 169,902 171,054 

Life insurance liabilities4,977 7,377 7,597 9,019 12,361 11,559 

All other liabilities3,788 5,614 3,580 3,250 3,318 3,440 

Total liabilities excluding loan capital552,695 819,293 797,754 772,867 765,216 744,401 

Loan capital14,724 21,826 17,265 17,666 15,805 13,840 

Total liabilities567,419 841,119 815,019 790,533 781,021 758,241 

Net assets44,191 65,507 64,573 61,342 58,181 53,915 

Total equity attributable to owners of Westpac Banking

Corporation44,155 65,454 64,521 61,288 58,120 53,098 

Non-controlling interests36 53 52 54 61 817 

Total shareholders’ equity and non-controlling interests44,191 65,507 64,573 61,342 58,181 53,915 

Average balances 

     

Total assets603,581 894,724 873,310 854,058 831,439 791,719 

Loans and other receivables

3

469,009 695,240 681,201 657,628 631,266 596,378 

Total equity attributable to owners of Westpac 

     

Banking Corporation42,981 63,714 62,017 58,556 55,896 49,361 

Non-controlling interests34 50 31 20 575 854 

1. Where accounting classifications have changed or where changes in accounting policy are adopted retrospectively, comparatives have

been restated and may differ from results previously reported.

2. Australian dollar amounts have been translated into US dollars solely for the convenience of the reader at the rate of

A$1.00 = US$0.6746 (refer to ‘Reading this report’ section).

3. Includes interest earning balances. Effective from 1 October 2018, loans and other receivables are net of Stage 3 provisions to reflect the

adoption of AASB 9. For prior years, loans and receivables are net of provisions for impairment charges on loans (refer to Note 9 of the

financial statements). Other receivables include cash and balances with central banks and other interest earning assets.

882019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Review of Group operations

Summary of consolidated ratios

As at 30 September201920192018201720162015

(in $m unless otherwise indicated)US$

1

A$A$A$A$A$

Profitability ratios (%)      

Net interest margin

2

2.12 2.12 2.13 2.06 2.10 2.09 

Return on average assets

3

0.76 0.76 0.93 0.94 0.90 1.01 

Return on average ordinary equity

4

10.65 10.65 13.05 13.65 13.32 16.23 

Return on average total equity

5

10.64 10.64 13.05 13.64 13.18 15.96 

Capital ratios (%) 

     

Average total equity to average total assets7.13 7.13 7.10 6.86 6.79 6.34 

Common equity Tier 110.67 10.67 10.63 10.56 9.48 9.50 

Tier 1 ratio12.84 12.84 12.78 12.66 11.17 11.38 

Total capital ratio15.63 15.63 14.74 14.82 13.11 13.26 

Earning ratios 

     

Basic earnings per ordinary share (cents)

6

132.6 196.5 237.5 238.0 224.6 255.0 

Diluted earnings per ordinary share (cents)

7

127.8 189.5 230.1 229.3 217.8 248.2 

Dividends per ordinary share (cents)117174.0188 188 188 187 

Dividend payout ratio (%)88.8388.83 79.52 79.28 84.19 73.39 

Credit quality ratios 

     

Loans written off (net of recoveries)662 982 948 1,488 1,052 1,107 

Loans written off (net of recoveries) to average loans (bps)14 14 14 22 16 18 

Balance sheet review

Assets – 2019 v 2018

Total assets as at 30 September 2019 were $906.6 billion, an increase of $27.0 billion or 3% compared to

30 September 2018. Significant movements during the year included:

• cash and balances with central banks decreased $6.7 billion or 25% reflecting lower liquid assets held in this

form;

• collateral paid increased $1.1 billion or 24% mainly due to an increase in collateralised derivative liabilities;

• trading securities and financial assets measured at fair value through income statement (FVIS), available-for-

sale securities and investment securities increased $20.9 billion or 25% reflecting higher liquid assets held in this

form;

• derivative assets increased $5.8 billion or 24% mainly driven by movements in cross currency swaps, foreign

currency forward contracts and interest rate swaps; and

• loans grew $5.1 billion or 1%. Refer to loan quality – 2019 v 2018 below for further information.

Liabilities and equity – 2019 v 2018

Total liabilities as at 30 September 2019 were $841.1 billion, an increase of $26.1 billion or 3% compared to

30 September 2018. Significant movements during the year included:

• collateral received increased $1.1 billion or 51% due to an increase in collateralised derivative assets;

• deposits and other borrowings increased $4.0 billion or 1%;

• other financial liabilities increased $1.1 billion or 4% mainly driven by securities sold under agreements to

repurchase and interbank deposits, partially offset by decreases in accrued interest payable and other financial

liabilities;

• derivative liabilities increased $4.7 billion or 19% driven by movements in cross currency swaps and interest rate

swaps;

• debt issues increased $8.9 billion or 5% ($1.8 billion or 1% decrease excluding foreign currency translation

impacts, fair value and hedge accounting adjustments); and

• loan capital increased $4.6 billion or 26% mainly due to $3.2 billion net issuance of Tier 2 capital instruments in

response to APRA’s Total Loss Absorbing Capital announcement and $1.3 billion impact of hedging and foreign

currency translation.

1. Australian dollar amounts have been translated into US dollars solely for the convenience of the reader at the rate of A$1.00 = US$0.6746

(refer to ‘Reading this report’ section).

2. Calculated by dividing net interest income by average interest earning assets.

3. Calculated by dividing net profit attributable to owners of Westpac Banking Corporation by average total assets.

4. Calculated by dividing net profit attributable to owners of Westpac Banking Corporation by average ordinary equity.

5. Calculated by dividing net profit attributable to owners of Westpac Banking Corporation by average ordinary equity and

non-controlling interests.

6. Based on the weighted average number of fully paid ordinary shares.

7. Based on basic earnings per share, with the weighted average number of fully paid ordinary shares outstanding adjusted for the

conversion of dilutive potential ordinary shares, issued for no consideration, and after adjusting earnings for distributions on dilutive

potential ordinary shares.

892019 Westpac Group Annual Report
1

2

3

4

Review of Group operations

1

2

3

4

Equity attributable to owners of Westpac Banking Corporation increased $0.9 billion or 1% reflecting retained

profits and shares issued under the 2019 interim dividend reinvestment plan (DRP) and 2018 final DRP, partially

offset by $0.7 billion opening retained earnings adjustment due to the adoption of new accounting standards and

dividends paid during the year.

Loan quality – 2019 v 2018

1


As at 30 September

$m201920182017

Total gross loans

1

718,378 712,504 687,785 

Average gross loans   

Australia622,241 611,398 588,920 

New Zealand78,065 73,000 72,269 

Other overseas16,615 16,228 12,837 

Total average gross loans716,921 700,626 674,026 

Total gross loans represented 79% of the total assets of the Group as at 30 September 2019, 2% lower compared

with 30 September 2018. The decrease was mainly due to greater holdings of liquid assets and movements in cross

currency swaps and interest rate swaps.

Australian average gross loans were $622.2 billion in 2019, an increase of $10.8 billion or 2% from $611.4 billion in

2018. This increase was primarily due to growth in housing loans.

New Zealand average gross loans were A$78.1 billion in 2019, an increase of A$5.1 billion or 7% from A$73.0 billion

in 2018. Excluding foreign currency translation impacts, New Zealand average gross loans grew A$2.7 billion or

4%. The growth was mostly from fixed rate housing loans and business lending, partially offset by lower personal

lending and credit cards.

Other overseas average loans were $16.6 billion in 2019, an increase of $0.4 billion or 2% from $16.2 billion in 2018.

This was primarily due to the depreciation of AUD against USD.

Approximately 14% of the loans at 30 September 2019 mature within one year and 17% mature between one year

and five years. Retail lending comprises the majority of the loan portfolio maturing after five years.

Housing and personal loans that were past due, can be disaggregated based on days overdue at 30 September

2019 as follows:

Consolidated20192018

$m30-89 days90+ daysTotal30-89 days90+ daysTotal

Loans      

Loans - housing3,5744,0637, 6 373,1333,2716,404

Loans - personal395356751427371798

Total3,9694,4198,3883,5603,6427,202

Impaired exposures

2,3


As at 30 September

$m20192018201720162015

Impaired exposures     

Housing and business loans:     

Gross1,3271,019 1,142 1,851 1,593 

Provisions(534)(458)(507)(885)(689)

Net793 561 635 966 904 

Personal loans greater than 90 days past due:     

Gross405 371 373 277 263 

Provisions(248)(189)(195)(166)(172)

Net157 182 178 111 91 

Restructured:     

Gross31 26 27 31 39 

Provisions(10)(6)(12)(16)(16)

Net21 20 15 15 23 

Net impaired exposures971 763 828 1,092 1,018 

Provisions for ECL/impairment on loans and credit commitments     

Individually assessed provisions412 422 480 869 669 

Collectively assessed provisions3,5012,631 2,639 2,733 2,663 

Total provisions for ECL/impairment on loans and credit commitments3,913 3,053 3,119 3,602 3,332 

Loan quality     

Total provisions for ECL/impairment charges on impaired exposures to total impaired

exposures

3

44.92%46.12%46.30%49.42%46.28%

Gross impaired exposures to total gross loans0.25%0.20%0.22%0.32%0.30%

Total provisions for ECL/impairment on loans and credit commitments to gross loans0.54%0.43%0.45%0.54%0.53%

Total provisions for ECL/impairment on loans and credit commitments to gross impaired

exposures222.0%215.6%202.3%166.8%175.8%

1. Gross loans are stated before related provision for ECL/impairment charges on loans and credit commitments.

2. The Group has adopted AASB9 and AASB15 from 1 October 2018. Comparatives have not been restated. Refer to Note 1 for further detail.

3. Impaired provisions relating to impaired loans include IAP plus the proportion of the CAP that relates to impaired loans. The proportion

of the CAP that relates to impaired loans was $380 million as at 30 September 2019 (2018: $231 million, 2017: $234 million, 2016:

$198 million, 2015: $208 million). This sum is compared to the total gross impaired loans to determine this ratio.

902019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Review of Group operations

The credit quality remained sound over 2019, with total stressed exposures to TCE increasing by 12 basis points to

1.20%. Total impaired exposures as a percentage of total gross loans were 0.25% at 30 September 2019, an increase

of 0.05% from 0.20% at 30 September 2018.

At 30 September 2019, we had one impaired counterparty with exposure greater than $50 million, accounting for

4% of total impaired loans. This compares to one impaired counterparty with exposure greater than $50 million in

2018 accounting for 4% of total impaired loans. There was one impaired counterparty at 30 September 2019 that

was less than $50 million and greater than $20 million (2018: two impaired counterparties).

At 30 September 2019, 79% of our exposure was to either investment grade or secured consumer mortgage

segment (2018: 79%, 2017: 78%, 2016: 78%, 2015: 77%) and 96% of our exposure as at 30 September 2019 was in

Australia, New Zealand and the Pacific region (2018: 95%, 2017: 96%, 2016: 96%, 2015: 95%).

We believe that Westpac remains appropriately provisioned. Total impairment provisions for impaired exposure to

total impaired exposure coverage at 44.9% at 30 September 2019 compared to 46.1% at 30 September 2018. Total

provisions for ECL on loans and credit commitments to total impaired exposures represented 222.0% of total impaired

loans as at 30 September 2019, up from 215.6%

1

at 30 September 2018. Total provisions for ECL on loans and credit

commitments to total loans were 0.54% at 30 September 2019, up from 0.43%

1

at 30 September 2018 (2017: 0.45%)

1

.

Group mortgage loans 90 days past due at 30 September 2019 were 0.82% of outstandings, up from 0.67% of

outstandings at 30 September 2018 (2017: 0.62%).

Group other consumer loan delinquencies (including credit card and personal loan products) were 1.69% of

outstandings as at 30 September 2019, up from 1.64% of outstandings as at 30 September 2018 (2017: 1.57%).

Potential problem loans as at 30 September 2019 amounted to $1,297 million, a decrease of 23% from $1,691 million

at 30 September 2018. The decrease in potential problem loans was mainly due to the downgrade of a Institutional

counterparty to impaired over the year.

Potential problem loans are facilities that are performing and no loss is expected, but the customer demonstrates

significant weakness in debt servicing or security cover that could jeopardise repayment of debt on current terms if

not rectified. Potential problem loans are identified using established credit frameworks and policies, which include

the ongoing monitoring of facilities through the use of watchlists.

Capital resources

APRA measures an ADI’s regulatory capital using three measures:

• Common Equity Tier 1 Capital (CET1) comprises the highest quality components of capital that consists of

paid-up share capital, retained profits and certain reserves, less certain intangible assets, capitalised expenses

and software, and investments and retained profits in insurance and funds management subsidiaries that are

not consolidated for capital adequacy purposes;

• Tier 1 Capital being the sum of CET1 and Additional Tier 1 Capital. Additional Tier 1 Capital comprises high

quality components of capital that consist of certain securities not included in CET1, but which include loss

absorbing characteristics; and

• Total Regulatory Capital being the sum of Tier 1 Capital and Tier 2 Capital. Tier 2 Capital includes subordinated

instruments and other components of capital that, to varying degrees, do not meet the criteria for Tier 1 Capital,

but nonetheless contribute to the overall strength of an ADI and its capacity to absorb losses.

Under APRA’s Prudential Standards, Australian ADIs, including Westpac, are required to maintain a minimum CET1

ratio of at least 4.5%, Tier 1 Capital ratio of at least 6.0% and Total Regulatory Capital ratio of at least 8.0%. APRA

may also require ADIs, including Westpac, to meet Prudential Capital Requirements (PCRs) above the minimum

capital ratios. APRA does not allow the PCRs for individual ADIs to be disclosed.

APRA also requires ADIs to hold additional CET1 buffers comprising of:

• a capital conservation buffer (CCB) of 3.5% for ADIs designated by APRA as domestic systemically important

banks (D-SIBs) unless otherwise determined by APRA, which includes a 1.0% surcharge for D-SIBs. APRA has

determined that Westpac is a D-SIB; and

• a countercyclical capital buffer. The countercyclical buffer is set on a jurisdictional basis and APRA is

responsible for setting the requirement in Australia. The countercyclical buffer requirement is currently set to

zero for Australia and New Zealand.

Collectively, the above buffers are referred to as the “Capital Buffer” (CB). Should the CET1 capital ratio fall

within the capital buffer range restrictions on the distributions of earnings will apply. This includes restrictions

on the amount of earnings that can be distributed through dividends, Additional Tier 1 Capital distributions and

discretionary staff bonuses.

1. The provisions for impairment charges on loans and credit commitments were determined under AASB139.

912019 Westpac Group Annual Report
1

2

3

4

Review of Group operations

1

2

3

4

Capital actions

While Westpac’s CET1 capital ratio is above APRA’s ‘unquestionably strong’ benchmark of 10.5%, the Group’s lower

cash earnings, new operational risk capital overlays and changes in the calculation of risk weighted assets has

impacted the Group’s capital generation over the year. Given our priority for balance sheet strength and our goal

to support customer growth, we are seeking to raise approximately $2.5 billion in capital to provide an increased

buffer above APRA’s unquestionably strong benchmark. The raising also creates flexibility for changes in capital

rules and potential litigation or regulatory action. The raising is expected to lift the Group’s CET1 ratios by around

46-58

1

basis points.

Capital management strategy

Westpac’s approach to capital management seeks to ensure that it is adequately capitalised as an ADI. Westpac

evaluates its approach to capital management through an Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process (ICAAP),

the key features of which include:

• the development of a capital management strategy, including consideration of regulatory minimums, capital

buffers and contingency plans;

• consideration of both economic and regulatory capital requirements;

• a stress testing framework that challenges the capital measures, coverage and requirements including the

impact of adverse economic scenarios; and

• consideration of the perspectives of external stakeholders, including rating agencies and equity and debt investors.

In light of APRA’s ‘unquestionably strong’ capital benchmarks, Westpac will seek to operate with a CET1 capital

ratio above 10.5% in March and September as measured under the existing capital framework. Additional buffers

may also be held to reflect challenging or uncertain environments. This also takes into consideration:

• Current regulatory capital minimums and the capital conservation buffer (CCB), which together are the total

CET1 requirement

2

;

• Stress testing to calibrate an appropriate buffer against a downturn; and

• Quarterly volatility of capital ratios due to the half yearly cycle of ordinary dividend payments.

Westpac will revise its target capital level once APRA finalises its review of the capital adequacy framework.

Total regulatory capital developments

On 9 July 2019 APRA announced that it will require the major banks (including Westpac) to lift Total Regulatory

Capital by three percentage points of RWA by 1 January 2024 in order to boost loss absorbing capacity and

support orderly resolution. APRA also confirmed that its overall long term target of an additional four to five

percentage points of loss absorbing capacity remains unchanged, and that it will consider the most feasible

alternative method of sourcing the remaining one to two percentage points, taking into account the particular

characteristics of the Australian financial system.

Further details of APRA’s regulatory changes are set out in the Significant Developments section of the 2019

Annual Report.

1. Based on risk weighted assets as at 30 September 2019, a 46 basis point increase reflects the impact of the placement only of $2

billion, while a 58 basis point increase reflects the impact of both the placement and the share purchase plan, assuming the share

purchase plan raises $500 million (the basis point impacts are net of issue costs).

2. Noting that APRA may apply higher CET1 requirements for an individual ADI.

922019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Review of Group operations

Basel Capital Accord

APRA’s Prudential Standards are generally consistent with the International Regulatory Framework for Banks,

also known as Basel III, issued by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS), except where APRA has

exercised certain discretions. On balance, the application of these discretions acts to reduce capital ratios reported

under APRA’s Prudential Standards relative to the BCBS approach and to those reported in some other jurisdictions.

Westpac is accredited by APRA to apply advanced models permitted by the Basel III global capital adequacy

regime to the measurement of its regulatory capital requirements. Westpac uses the Advanced Internal Ratings

Based approach for credit risk, the Advanced Measurement Approach (AMA) for operational risk and the internal

model approach for Interest Rate Risk in the Banking Book (IRRBB).

Westpac’s Level 2 regulatory capital ratios as at 30 September are summarised in the table below. As the table

summarises Westpac’s Level 2 regulatory capital structure, the capital amounts shown are not the same as the

Westpac Group’s consolidated financial statements. Westpac’s Pillar 3 Report provides further details regarding

Westpac’s capital structure.

Westpac’s Level 2 regulatory capital ratios as at 30 September are summarised in the table below. Westpac’s Pillar

3 Report provides further details regarding Westpac’s capital structure.

$m20192018

Common equity64,320 63,576 

Deductions from common equity(18,568)(18,337)

Total common equity after deductions45,75245,239 

Additional Tier 1 capital9,299 9,144 

Net Tier 1 regulatory capital55,05154,383 

Tier 2 capital12,226 8,565 

Deductions from Tier 2 capital(255)(233)

Total Tier 2 capital after deductions11,9718,332 

Total regulatory capital67,0 2 262,715 

Credit risk367,864362,749 

Market risk9,3506,723 

Operational risk47,68039,113 

Interest rate risk in the banking book53012,989 

Other assets3,370 3,810 

Total risk weighted assets428,794425,384 

Common Equity Tier 1 capital ratio10.67%10.63%

Additional Tier 1 capital ratio2.17%2.15%

Tier 1 capital ratio12.84%12.78%

Tier 2 capital ratio2.79%1.96%

Total regulatory capital ratio15.63%14.74%

932019 Westpac Group Annual Report
1

2

3

4

Divisional performance

1

2

3

4

Divisional performance – 2019 v 2018

On 19 March 2019, the Group announced changes to the way it supports customer’s wealth and insurance

needs, realigning its BT Financial Group (BTFG) businesses into expanded Consumer and Business divisions and

exiting the provision of personal financial advice by Westpac Group salaried financial advisers and authorised

representatives. As a result, the insurance business was transferred to Consumer, the funds management business

was transferred to Business , and the Advice business and certain support functions were transferred to Group

Businesses. Changes to the Group’s organisation structure were effective from 1 April 2019 and the results of the

operating segments for 2018 and 2017 have been restated.

Westpac reports under the following four primary customer-facing business divisions:

• Consumer:

–is responsible for sales and service of banking and financial products and services to consumer customers in

Australia;

–responsible for the Group’s Australian insurance business, which covers the manufacture and distribution of

life, general and lenders mortgage insurance; and

–operates under the Westpac, St.George, BankSA, Bank of Melbourne, RAMS and BT brands.

• Business:

–is responsible for sales and service of banking and financial products and services for SME and commercial

business customers in Australia. SME and Commercial business customers typically have facilities up to

approximately $150 million;

–is responsible for Private Wealth, serving the banking needs of high net worth customers across the banking

brands;

–is responsible for the manufacture and distribution of investments (including margin lending and equities

broking), superannuation and retirement products as well as wealth administration platforms; and

–operates under the Westpac, St.George, BankSA, Bank of Melbourne and BT brands.

• Westpac Institutional Bank:

–is responsible for delivering a broad range of financial products and services to commercial, corporate,

institutional and government customers with connections to Australia and New Zealand;

–services include financing, transactional banking, financial and debt capital markets;

–customers are supported throughout Australia, as well as via branches and subsidiaries located in New

Zealand, US, UK and Asia; and

–also responsible for Westpac Pacific, providing a range of banking services in Fiji and Papua New Guinea.

• Westpac New Zealand:

–responsible for sales and service of banking, wealth and insurance products to customers in New Zealand;

–customer base includes consumers, business and institutional customers; and

–operates under the Westpac brand for banking products, the Westpac Life brand for life insurance products

and the BT brand for wealth products.

• Group Businesses include:

–Treasury, which is responsible for the management of the Group’s balance sheet including wholesale

funding, capital and management of liquidity. Treasury also manages the interest rate risk and foreign

exchange risks inherent in the balance sheet, including managing the mismatch between Group assets and

liabilities. Treasury’s earnings are primarily sourced from managing the Group’s balance sheet and interest

rate risk, (excluding Westpac New Zealand) within set risk limits;

–Group Technology, which comprises functions for the Australian businesses, is responsible for technology

strategy and architecture, infrastructure and operations, applications development and business integration;

–Core Support, which comprises functions performed centrally, including Australian banking operations,

property services, strategy, finance, risk, compliance, legal, human resources, and customer and corporate

relations;

–Following the Group’s decision to restructure the Wealth operating segment and to exit of the Advice

business in March 2019, the remaining Advice activities (including associated remediation) and certain

support functions have been transferred to Group Businesses; and

–Group Businesses also includes earnings on capital not allocated to divisions, certain intra-group

transactions that facilitate presentation of performance of the Group’s operating segments, earnings from

non-core asset sales, earnings and costs associated with the Group’s Fintech investments, and certain other

head office items such as centrally held provisions.

The accounting standard AASB 8 Operating Segments requires segment results to be presented on a basis

that is consistent with information provided internally to Westpac’s key decision makers. In assessing financial

performance, including divisional results, Westpac Group uses a measure of performance referred to as ‘cash

earnings’. Cash earnings is viewed as a measure of the level of profit that is generated by ongoing operations and is

therefore considered in assessing distributions, including dividends. Cash earnings is neither a measure of cash flow

nor net profit determined on a cash accounting basis, as it includes both cash and non-cash adjustments to net

profit attributable to owners of Westpac Banking Corporation. Management believes this allows the Group to more

effectively assess performance for the current period against prior periods and to compare performance across

business divisions and across peer companies.

Divisional performance

942019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Divisional performance

A reconciliation of cash earnings to net profit attributable to owners of Westpac Banking Corporation for each

business division is set out in Note 2 of the Financial Statements.

To determine cash earnings, three categories of adjustments are made to statutory results:

• material items that key decision makers at the Westpac Group believe do not reflect operating performance;

• items that are not considered when dividends are recommended, such as the amortisation of intangibles,

impact of Treasury shares and economic hedging; and

• accounting reclassifications between individual line items that do not impact statutory results.

The discussion of our divisional performance in this section is presented on a cash earnings basis unless otherwise

stated. Cash earnings is not directly comparable to statutory results presented in other parts of this Annual Report.

Outlined below are the cash earnings adjustments to the reported result:

• amortisation of intangible assets: Identifiable intangible assets arising from business acquisitions are

amortised over their useful lives, ranging between four and twenty years. This amortisation (excluding

capitalised software) is a cash earnings adjustment because it is a non-cash flow item and does not affect

cash distributions available to shareholders. The last of these intangible assets were fully amortised in

December 2017;

• fair value (gain)/loss on economic hedges (which do not qualify for hedge accounting under AAS) comprise:

–the unrealised fair value (gain)/loss on foreign exchange hedges of future New Zealand earnings impacting

non-interest income is reversed in deriving cash earnings as they may create a material timing difference on

reported results but do not affect the Group’s cash earnings over the life of the hedge; and

–the unrealised fair value (gain)/loss on hedges of accrual accounted term funding transactions are reversed

in deriving cash earnings as they may create a material timing difference on reported results but do not

affect the Group’s cash earnings over the life of the hedge;

• ineffective hedges: The unrealised (gain)/loss on ineffective hedges is reversed in deriving cash earnings

because the gain or loss arising from the fair value movement in these hedges reverses over time and does not

affect the Group’s profits over time;

• adjustment related to Pendal (previously BTIM): Consistent with prior years’ treatment, this item have been

treated as a cash earnings adjustment given their size and that it does not reflect ongoing operations. The

Group has indicated that it may sell the remaining 10% shareholding in Pendal at some future date. From

September 2018, this adjustment relates to the mark to market of the shares and separation costs related to the

original sell down. Any future gain or loss on this shareholding will similarly be excluded from the calculation of

cash earnings;

• Treasury shares: Under AAS, Westpac shares held by the Group in the managed funds and life businesses are

deemed to be Treasury shares and the results of holding these shares cannot be recognised in the reported

results. In deriving cash earnings, these results are included to ensure there is no asymmetrical impact on the

Group’s profits because the Treasury shares support policyholder liabilities and equity derivative transactions

which are re-valued in determining income; and

• accounting reclassifications between individual line items that do not impact reported results comprise:

–policyholder tax recoveries: Income and tax amounts that are grossed up to comply with the AAS covering

Life Insurance Business (policyholder tax recoveries) are reversed in deriving income and taxation expense

on a cash earnings basis; and

–operating leases: Under AAS rental income on operating leases is presented gross of the depreciation of

the assets subject to the lease. These amounts are offset in deriving non-interest income and operating

expenses on a cash earnings basis.

• for Westpac, AASB 9 and AASB 15 were adopted on 1 October 2018 and as comparatives were not restated,

line item movements in our reported results are not directly comparable across periods. In order to provide

the operational trends in business, we have revised the 2018 and 2017 cash earnings comparatives as if the

standards applied on 1 October 2017, except for expected credit loss provisioning which is not feasible. These

adjustments do not impact 2018 and 2017 cash earnings but affect individual line items. These adjustments are

comprised of:

–line fees: The Group has reclassified line fees (mostly Business) from non-interest income to net interest

income to more appropriately reflect the relationship with drawn lines of credit;

–card scheme: Support payments received from Mastercard and Visa have been reclassified to non-interest

income and related expenses have been reclassified to operating expenses;

–interest carrying adjustment: Interest on performing loans (stage 1 and stage 2 loans) is now measured on

the gross loan value. Previously, interest on performing loans was recognised on the loan balance net of

provisions. This adjustment increases interest income and impairment charges;

–other fees and expenses: The Group has restated the classification of a number of fees and expenses.

This has resulted in the grossing up of net interest income, non-interest income, impairment charges and

operating expenses; and

–merchant terminal costs: Some variable costs related to Westpac’s merchant terminal business have been

reclassified between non-interest income and operating expenses.

952019 Westpac Group Annual Report
1

2

3

4

Divisional performance

1

2

3

4

The guidance provided in Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) Regulatory Guide 230 has

been followed when presenting this information.

Comparatives have also been restated for:

• recent customer migration between divisions. This includes restatements to divisional income statements and

balance sheets;

• refinement in expense allocations; and

• changes to the Group’s organisation structure following the realignment of the BTFG businesses into Consumer,

Business and Group Businesses.

Cash earnings by division

The following tables present, for each of the key divisions of our business, the cash earnings and total assets at the

end of the financial years ended 30 September 2019, 2018 and 2017. Refer to Note 2 to the financial statements for

the disclosure of our geographic and business segments and the reconciliation to net profit attributable to owners

of Westpac Banking Corporation.

$m201920182017

Consumer3,288 3,423 3,452 

Business2,431 2,756 2,554 

Westpac Institutional Bank1,014 1,093 1,163 

Westpac New Zealand985 934 917 

Group Businesses(869)(141)(24)

Total cash earnings6,849 8,065 8,062 

In presenting divisional results on a management reporting basis, internal charges and transfer pricing adjustments

are included in the performance of each division reflecting the management structure rather than the legal entity

(these results cannot be compared to results for individual legal entities). Where management reporting structures

or accounting classifications have changed, financial results for comparative periods have been revised and may

differ from results previously reported.

Our internal transfer pricing frameworks facilitate risk transfer, profitability measurement, capital allocation and

business unit alignment, tailored to the jurisdictions in which we operate. Transfer pricing allows us to measure

the relative contribution of our products and divisions to the Group’s interest margin and other dimensions of

performance. Key components of our transfer pricing frameworks are funds transfer pricing for interest rate and

liquidity risk and allocation of basis and contingent liquidity costs, including capital allocation.

Additional provisions

Net profit for 2019 was impacted by additional provisions after tax of $1,130 million for:

• Estimated customer refunds and payments, associated costs, and litigation of $958 million; and

• Restructuring costs associated with the restructuring of the Wealth business of $172 million.

The tables below show the impact of the estimated customer refunds, payments, associated costs, litigation, and

restructuring costs on the divisions for 2019 and 2018. Restructuring costs associated with the restructuring of the

wealth business is only reflected in Group Business and were only incurred in 2019.

2019  WestpacWestpac  

   InstitutionalNew ZealandGroup 

$mConsumerBusinessBank($A)BusinessesGroup

Net interest income(85)(246)– (13)– (344)

Non-interest income(2)(55)– (4)(759)(820)

Benefits/(expenses)25 (87)– (15)(384)(461)

Core earnings(62)(388)– (32)(1,143)(1,625)

Tax and non-controlling interests29 118 – 9 339 495 

Cash earnings(33)(270)– (23)(804)(1,130)

2018  WestpacWestpac  

   InstitutionalNew ZealandGroup 

$mConsumerBusinessBank($A)BusinessesGroup

Net interest income(99)– – (2)(4)(105)

Non-interest income(12)– – (11)(140)(163)

Expenses(39)(5)– (3)(65)(112)

Core earnings(150)(5)– (16)(209)(380)

Tax and non-controlling interests36 – – 4 59 99 

Cash earnings(114)(5)– (12)(150)(281)

962019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Divisional performance

Consumer

Consumer is responsible for sales and service to consumer customers in Australia. Consumer is also responsible

for the Group’s insurance business which covers the manufacture and distribution of life, general and lenders

mortgage insurances. The division also uses a third party to manufacture certain general insurance products.

Banking products are provided under the Westpac, St.George, BankSA, Bank of Melbourne, and RAMS brands,

while insurance products are provided under Westpac and BT brands. Consumer works with Business and WIB in

the sales, service, and referral of certain financial services and products including superannuation, platforms, auto

lending and foreign exchange. The revenue from these products is mostly retained by the product originators.

Financial performance

$m201920182017

Net interest income7,942 7,850 7,733 

Non-interest income1,141 1,311 1,351 

Net operating income before operating expenses and impairment charges9,083 9,161 9,084 

Operating expenses(3,817)(3,774)(3,548)

Impairment charges(581)(486)(600)

Profit before income tax4,685 4,901 4,936 

Income tax expense(1,397)(1,478)(1,484)

Cash earnings for the year3,288 3,423 3,452 

Net cash earnings adjustments– (15)(116)

Net profit attributable to owners of Westpac Banking Corporation3,288 3,408 3,336 

$bn $bn $bn

Deposits and other borrowings209.3 206.2 196.2 

Net loans388.5 385.4 370.3 

Total assets399.2 395.6 381.8 

Total operating expenses to net operating income ratio42.02%41.20%39.06%

2019 v 2018

Cash earnings were 4% lower from a decline in non-interest income mainly reflecting weather related general

insurance claims, and an increased impairment charge. Cash earnings also benefited from a reduction in provisions

for estimated customer refunds, payments, associated costs and litigation.

Net interest income

up $92 million, 1%

• Lending increased 1% with growth in mortgages, partly offset by a decline in other personal

lending and higher provisions associated with the adoption of AASB 9. The decline in

personal lending was due to a 6% reduction in cards and lower personal loans;

• A 4% rise in transaction accounts, and 5% increase in savings accounts supported the 2% rise

in deposits. Term deposits were 6% lower; and

• Net interest margin was down 3 basis points. The decline was due to lower mortgage spreads

from increased competition and changes in mortgage mix with less interest only lending. The

decline was partly offset by mortgage repricing late in 2018.

Non-interest

income down $170

million, 13%

• The decline was mostly due to lower insurance income down ($116 million), from higher

weather related claims ($70 million), and lower life insurance income related to the impact of

the Protecting Your Super legislation and from higher claims; and

• Lower fee income from a contraction in net interchange fees and reduced transaction

volumes across banking products.

Operating

expenses up $43

million, 1%

• Operating expenses benefited from the reversal of provisions raised for estimated associated

costs and litigation in respect to customer refunds and payments, a benefit of $25 million,

compared to a charge of $39 million in 2018. Excluding the benefit of this turnaround,

operating expenses were up 3%;

• The rise was due to higher investment related costs including for the customer service hub,

and costs associated with regulatory change projects; and

• Higher costs from annual salary reviews and inflation based increases were more than offset

by productivity gains of $125 million mostly from organisational redesign, rationalisation of

57 branches and 349 ATMs, and further use of digital channels, all of which contributed to a

reduction in FTE. Lower variable remuneration also contributed.

Impairment

charges up $95

million, 20%

• Credit quality remains sound, although stress was higher with stressed exposures to TCE at

0.81% up 16 basis points consistent with the deterioration in the operating environment;

• Mortgage 90+ day delinquencies were up 16 basis points to 0.90% while other consumer 90+

day delinquencies were up 25 basis points; and

• Impairment charges were higher driven by the rise in delinquencies.

972019 Westpac Group Annual Report
1

2

3

4

Divisional performance

1

2

3

4

Business

Business provides business banking and wealth facilities and products for customers across Australia. Business is

responsible for manufacturing and distributing facilities to SME and Commercial business customers (including

Agribusiness) generally for up to $150 million in exposure. SME customers include relationship managed and

non-relationship managed SME customers (generally between $100k-$250k facilities). The division offers a

wide range of banking products and services to support their borrowing, payments and transaction needs. In

addition, specialist services are provided for cash flow finance, trade finance, automotive and equipment finance

and property finance. The division is also responsible for Private Wealth and the manufacture and distribution of

investments (including margin lending and equities broking), superannuation and retirement products as well as

wealth administration platforms. Business operates under the Westpac, St.George, BankSA, Bank of Melbourne, and

BT brands. Business works with Consumer and WIB in the sale, referral and service of select financial services and

risk management products (including corporate superannuation, foreign exchange and interest rate hedging). The

revenue from these products is mostly retained by the product originators.

Financial performance

$m201920182017

Net interest income5,092 5,284 4,950 

Non-interest income1,464 1,640 1,617 

Net operating income before operating expenses and impairment charges6,556 6,924 6,567 

Operating expenses(2,805)(2,651)(2,548)

Impairment charges(272)(321)(369)

Profit before income tax3,479 3,952 3,650 

Income tax expense(1,048)(1,196)(1,096)

Cash earnings for the year2,431 2,756 2,554 

Net cash earnings adjustments(45)(76)150 

Net profit attributable to owners of Westpac Banking Corporation2,386 2,680 2,704 

$bn $bn $bn

Deposits and other borrowings147.8 143.8 137.9 

Net loans173.0 173.6 169.4 

Total assets187.4 188.2 183.7 

Total operating expenses to net operating income ratio42.79%38.29%38.80%

2019 v 2018

Cash earnings of $2,431 million were $325 million (or 12%) lower than 2018 with performance impacted by

provisions for estimated customer refunds and payments and associated costs of $270 million after tax. Excluding

these provisions, cash earnings were $60 million or 2% lower from a reduction in non-interest income and increased

regulatory expenditure, partially offset by an increase in net interest margin and a reduction in impairment charges.

Net interest income

down $192 million,

4%

• Lending was largely flat with growth in business lending offset by slower new auto lending;

• Deposits increased 3% mostly in transaction and at call balances. These gains were partly

offset by a 4% decline in term deposits; and

• Net interest margin declined 12 basis points with provisions for customer refunds and

payments ($246 million) contributing 15 basis points to the decline. Excluding this impact, the

net interest margin was up 3 basis points from loan repricing, partly offset by lower deposit

spreads and a shift in the mortgage mix from interest only to principal and interest.

Non-interest

income down $176

million, 11%

• Provisions for estimated customer refunds and payments of $55 million contributed to a

decrease in non-interest income. Excluding these provisions, non-interest income was down

$121 million or 7% mostly due to:

–A reduction in merchant income due to changes in scheme charges; and

–Lower wealth income ($85 million) from platform margin compression due to new

platform pricing, product mix changes, the cessation of grandfathered commission

payments and implementation of Protecting Your Super reforms.

Operating

expenses up $154

million, 6%

• Provisions for estimated costs of $87 million, to implement the division’s remediation

program, was one of the main drivers increasing expenses. Excluding these costs, expenses

were up 3% due to;

–Higher regulatory and compliance costs as well as increased amortisation of investments

and wealth project costs; and

–Other cost increases, mostly salary rises, were largely offset by lower variable reward and

productivity benefits including operating model simplification and continued digitisation

and product simplification.

Impairment

charges down $49

million, 15%

• The level of stressed exposures increased 24 basis points from increased Commercial stressed

exposures across a broad number of industries; and

• Impairment charges decreased from lower individual and collective provisions.

982019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Divisional performance

Westpac Institutional Bank

Westpac Institutional Bank (WIB) delivers a broad range of financial products and services to commercial,

corporate, institutional and government customers operating in, or with connections to Australia and New Zealand.

WIB operates through dedicated industry relationship and specialist product teams, with expert knowledge in

financing, transactional banking, and financial and debt capital markets. Customers are supported throughout

Australia and via branches and subsidiaries located in New Zealand, the US, UK and Asia. WIB is also responsible

for Westpac Pacific providing a full range of banking services in Fiji and PNG. WIB works with all the Group’s

divisions in the provision of markets related financial needs including foreign exchange and fixed interest solutions.

Financial performance

$m201920182017

Net interest income1,443 1,442 1,354 

Non-interest income1,292 1,565 1,716 

Net operating income before operating expenses and impairment charges2,735 3,007 3,070 

Operating expenses(1,284)(1,449)(1,358)

Impairment (charges)/benefits(46)16 (79)

Profit before income tax1,405 1,574 1,633 

Income tax expense(386)(476)(463)

Profit attributable to non-controlling interests(5)(5)(7)

Cash earnings for the year1,014 1,093 1,163 

Net cash earnings adjustments– – – 

Net profit attributable to owners of Westpac Banking Corporation1,014 1,093 1,163 

$bn $bn $bn

Deposits and other borrowings101.3 104.9 92.2 

Net loans75.4 77.4 74.8 

Total assets98.0 102.5 103.3 

Total operating expenses to net operating income ratio46.95%48.19%44.23%

2019 v 2018

Cash earnings of $1,014 million was $79 million (or 7%) lower compared to 2018, primarily from a $78 million

movement in derivative valuation adjustments, no contribution from Hastings and a $62 million increase in

impairment charges. The exit of Hastings in 2018 had a $17 million impact on cash earnings but had a more

significant impact on the movements in individual line items. In 2018 Hastings added $203 million to non-interest

income, $158 million to expenses and $29 million to tax.

Net interest income

up $1 million, flat

• Net loans were 3% lower reflecting a focus on return. This included a decline in property

lending;

• Deposits were 3% lower, mostly from a reduction in government balances; and

• Net interest margin down 1 basis point from lower deposits spreads and a change in funding

mix, partly offset by higher loan spreads consistent with the return focus.

Non-interest

income down $273

million, 17%

• Excluding Hastings (2018 $203 million; 2019 nil), non-interest income was down $70 million,

or 5%, from:

–A $78 million movement in derivative valuation adjustment (a $14 million benefit in 2018 to

a $64 million charge in 2019); and

–Partly offset by increase in syndication fees from some large transactions in 2019.

Operating

expenses

down $165 million,

11%

• Excluding Hastings (2018 $158 million; 2019 nil), expenses were down $7 million, or 1%, from

–Productivity benefits from organisation redesign (FTE down 8%) and lower variable

reward costs; and

–Partly offset by higher regulatory, risk and compliance costs, particularly related to

updated requirements for the new Banking Code of Practice and responding to regulator

requests.

Impairment charge

of $46 million

(compared to

a benefit of $16

million in FY18)

• Credit quality remains sound with stressed exposures to TCE of 0.68%. This was up 2 basis

point over the year but remains low in historical terms; and

• Impairment charges were higher due to provisions associated with the migration of two long

standing stressed exposures into impaired.

992019 Westpac Group Annual Report
1

2

3

4

Divisional performance

1

2

3

4

1. Refers to total customer deposits in this table.

Westpac New Zealand

Westpac New Zealand is responsible for sales and service of banking, wealth and insurance products for consumers,

business and institutional customers in New Zealand. Westpac conducts its New Zealand banking business through

two banks in New Zealand: Westpac New Zealand Limited, which is incorporated in New Zealand and Westpac

Banking Corporation (New Zealand Branch), which is incorporated in Australia. Westpac New Zealand operates via

an extensive network of branches and ATMs across both the North and South Islands. Business and institutional

customers are also served through relationship and specialist product teams. Banking products are provided

under the Westpac brand while insurance and wealth products are provided under Westpac Life and BT brands,

respectively. New Zealand also maintains its own infrastructure, including technology, operations and treasury.

Financial performance

NZ$m201920182017

Net interest income1,967 1,958 1,819 

Non-interest income448 406 438 

Net operating income before operating expenses and impairment charges2,415 2,364 2,257 

Operating expenses(993)(930)(949)

Impairment (charges)/benefits10 (25)55 

Profit before income tax1,432 1,409 1,363 

Income tax expense(390)(393)(392)

Profit attributable to non-controlling interests– – – 

Cash earnings for the year1,042 1,016 971 

Net cash earnings adjustments(1)14 (15)

Net profit attributable to owners of Westpac Banking Corporation1,041 1,030 956 

$bn $bn $bn

Deposits and other borrowings

1

64.5 61.9 58.4 

Net loans84.2 80.4 77.3 

Total assets97.1  90.0 88.3 

Total funds11.5 10.7 10.1 

Total operating expenses to net operating income ratio41.12%39.34%42.05%

2019 v 2018

Cash earnings increased 3% over 2018. The increase in cash earnings was supported by a NZ$40 million gain on the sale

of Paymark, and a NZ$10 million impairment benefit partly offset by higher risk management and regulatory costs.

Net interest income

up NZ$9 million,

Flat

• Loans increased 5%, or NZ$3.8 billion. Mortgages increased NZ$2.6 billion, with the majority

of mortgage growth in fixed rate products. Business growth (up NZ$1.3 billion) was

distributed across a range of sectors;

• Deposits increased 4% with a NZ$1.7 billion rise in non-interest bearing and at call accounts

and a NZ$0.9 billion rise in term deposits; and

• Net interest margin declined 8 basis points. Most of the decline (5 basis points) was due to

mix from the increase in lower spread products, particularly fixed rate mortgages. A fall in

deposit spreads from lower interest rates also contributed to the decline in margin.

Non-interest

income up NZ$42

million, 10%

• The gain on sale of Paymark contributed most (NZ$40 million) of the increase in non-interest

income;

• Higher investment income from a 7% increase in fund balances, higher business fees, and a

reduction in provisions for customer refunds and payments, also contributed to the increase;

and

• This was partly offset by lower fee income following the decision to simplify certain consumer

fees.

Operating

expenses up

NZ$63 million, 7%

• Most of the increase was driven by further investment in risk management and regulatory

programs.

• Provisions for estimated costs of NZ$16 million, to implement the division’s remediation

program also contributed to the increase; and

• Excluding investment and the above provisions, costs were broadly unchanged with increases

in salaries and other inflation linked costs offset by productivity savings from increased

digitisation of activities, with FTE down 1% and lower variable remuneration.

Impairment benefit

of NZ$10 million

(compared to an

impairment charge

of NZ$25 million in

FY18)

• Credit quality remains sound, with stressed exposures to TCE of 1.66%, 9 basis points higher

than September 2018 with most of the increase in stress in exposures that are well secured.

Other consumer 90+ day delinquencies increased 20 basis points to 82 basis points, with

much of the rise due to the decline in the portfolio; and

• Impairment benefit mostly from write-back of collectively assessed provision.

1002019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Divisional performance

AUD$m201920182017

Net interest income1,8601,7991,706

Non-interest income423373410

Net operating income before operating expenses and impairment charges2,2832,1722,116

Operating expenses(939)(855)(890)

Impairment (charges)/benefits10(22)51

Profit before income tax1,3541,2951,277

Income tax expense(369)(361)(360)

Profit attributable to non-controlling interests---

Cash earnings for the year985934917

Net cash earnings adjustments(1)13(14)

Net profit attributable to owners of Westpac Banking Corporation984947903

$bn$bn$bn

Deposits and other borrowings59.756.753.7

Net loans78.073.671.1

Total assets90.082.481.3

Total funds10.79.89.3

Total operating expenses to net operating income ratio

1

41.12%39.34%42.05%

1. Ratios calculated using NZ$.

1012019 Westpac Group Annual Report
1

2

3

4

Divisional performance

1

2

3

4

Group Businesses

This segment comprises:

• Treasury, which is responsible for the management of the Group’s balance sheet including wholesale funding,

capital and the management of liquidity. Treasury also manages the interest rate risk and foreign exchange risks

inherent in the balance sheet, including managing the mismatch between Group assets and liabilities. Treasury’s

earnings are primarily sourced from managing the Group’s balance sheet and interest rate risk, (excluding

Westpac New Zealand) within set risk limits;

• Group Technology

1

, which is responsible for technology strategy and architecture, infrastructure and operations,

applications development and business integration in Australia;

• Core Support

2

, which comprises functions performed centrally, including Australian banking operations,

property services, strategy, finance, risk, compliance, legal, human resources, and customer and corporate

relations; and

• Following the Group’s decision to restructure its wealth operations and exit its Advice business in March 2019,

the residual Advice operations (including associated remediation) and certain support functions of BTFG

Australia have been transferred to Group Businesses.

Group Technology costs are fully allocated to other divisions in the Group. Core Support costs are partially

allocated to other divisions, while Group Head Office costs are retained in Group Businesses.

Group Businesses also includes earnings on capital not allocated to divisions, certain intra-group transactions that

facilitate the presentation of the performance of the Group’s divisions, gains/losses from most asset sales, earnings

and costs associated with the Group’s Fintech investments, and certain other head office items such as centrally

raised provisions.

Financial performance

$m201920182017

Net interest income616 812 712 

Non-interest income(618)89 181 

Net operating income before operating expenses and impairment charges(2)901 893 

Operating expenses(1,186)(969)(834)

Impairment benefits95 1 43 

Profit before income tax(1,093)(67)102 

Income tax (expense)/benefit225 (75)(126)

Profit attributable to non-controlling interests(1)1 – 

Cash earnings for the year(869)(141)(24)

Net cash earnings adjustments(19)108 (92)

Net profit attributable to owners of Westpac Banking Corporation(888)(33)(116)

2019 v 2018

Provisions for estimated customer refunds, payments, associated costs, and litigation of $632 million and costs

associated with the Wealth Reset of $172 million incurred during the year was the key driver of the cash earnings

loss of $869 million in 2019. Excluding provisions for estimated customer refunds, payments, associated costs, and

litigation and costs associated with the Wealth Reset, Group Businesses cash earnings was $74 million lower as

the division recorded a loss of $65 million in 2019 compared to cash earnings of $9 million in 2018. The result was

driven by a lower contribution from Treasury partially offset by a higher impairment benefit.

Net operating

income down $903

million, large

• Net operating income was lower primarily from:

–an increased charge for estimated customer refunds and payments ($619 million) related

to Advice;

–a reduced contribution from Treasury related to interest rate risk management (down

$230 million) and lower Advice income; partly offset by

–a gain on asset sales and revaluation gains on a fintech investment ($24 million).

Operating

expenses up $217

million, large

• Estimated costs associated with implementing customer refunds and payments, the Wealth

Reset and litigation were $319 million higher; and

• Lower costs associated with the Royal Commission ($62 million) and lower variable reward.

Impairment

benefit $95 million,

a $94 million

increase

• An impairment benefit of $95 million reflect a reduction in centrally held overlays in 2019,

principally for the mining sector, partially offset by the introduction of an overlay for areas in

Australia impacted by persistent drought conditions, compared to a $1 million benefit in 2018.

1. Costs are fully allocated to other divisions in the Group.

2. Costs are partially allocated to other divisions in the Group, with costs attributed to enterprise activity retained in Group Businesses.

1022019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Risk and risk management

Risk factors

Our business is subject to risks that can adversely impact our financial performance, financial condition and future

performance. If any of the following risks occur, our business, prospects, reputation, financial performance or

financial condition could be materially adversely affected, with the result that the trading price of our securities

could decline and as a security holder you could lose all, or part, of your investment. You should carefully consider

the risks described and the other information in this Annual Report before investing in our securities. The risks and

uncertainties described below are not the only ones we face. Additional risks and uncertainties that we are unaware

of, or that we currently deem to be immaterial, may also become important factors that affect us.

Risks relating to our business

Our businesses are highly regulated and we have been and could be adversely affected by changes in laws,

regulations or regulatory policy

As a financial institution, we are subject to detailed laws and regulations in each of the jurisdictions in which we

operate or obtain funding, including Australia, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, the United States and various

jurisdictions in Asia and the Pacific. We are also supervised by a number of different regulatory and supervisory

authorities which have broad administrative powers over our businesses.

The Group’s business, prospects, reputation, financial performance and financial condition could all be affected by

changes to law and regulation, changes to policies and changes in the supervisory activities and expectations of

our regulators. The Group is currently operating in an environment where there is increased scrutiny of the financial

services sector and specifically, increased scrutiny of financial services providers by regulators. In this environment,

the Group faces increasing supervision and regulation in the jurisdictions in which we operate or obtain funding.

This environment has also served to increase the pace and scope of regulatory change.

Regulatory change could directly and adversely affect the Group’s financial condition and financial position. In

recent years, new laws have required Westpac to maintain increased levels of liquidity and hold higher levels of, and

better quality, capital and funding. Regulatory change may continue in this area. Regulation also affects the way

we operate our business. New regulation could require us to change our existing business models (including by

imposing restrictions on the types of businesses we can conduct) or amend our corporate structure.

Recently, policy makers and regulators have developed and implemented a range of regulations that affect how

we provide products and services to our customers. New laws have been introduced that further regulate our

ability to provide products and services to certain customers and that require us to alter our product and service

offerings. Our ability to set prices for certain products and services may also be impacted by future regulation. The

competitive landscape may also be altered by new laws affecting banks and financial services companies, or our

agents, authorised representatives and external service providers. The phasing in of Open Banking is one example

of new laws that are likely to affect competition amongst banks and other financial services providers in Australia.

Regulatory changes of this type could adversely affect one or more of our businesses, restrict our flexibility, require

us to incur substantial costs, impact the profitability of one or more of our business lines, result in the Group being

unable to increase or maintain market share and/or create pressure on our margins and fees, any of which could

adversely affect our business, prospects, financial performance or financial condition.

There are numerous sources of regulatory change that could affect our business. In some cases, changes to

regulation are driven by international bodies, such as the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS).

Regulatory change may also flow from reviews and inquiries commissioned by Governments or regulators. These

reviews and commissions of inquiry may lead to, and in some cases already have led to, substantial regulatory

change or investigations, which could have a material impact on our business, prospects, reputation, financial

performance or financial condition.

It is also possible that governments or regulators in jurisdictions in which we operate or obtain funding might

revise their application of existing regulatory policies that apply to, or impact, our business (including by instituting

macro-prudential limits on lending). Regulators or governments may take this action for a variety of reasons,

including for reasons relating to national interest and/or systemic stability.

Regulatory changes and the timing of their introduction continue to evolve and we manage our businesses in the

context of regulatory uncertainty and complexity. The nature and impact of future changes are not predictable

and are beyond our control. Regulatory compliance and the management of regulatory change are an important

part of our planning processes. We expect that we will continue to invest significantly in compliance and the

management and implementation of regulatory change and, at the same time, significant management attention

and resources will be required to update existing or implement new processes to comply with new regulations

(such as obligations to provide certain data and information to regulators) or new interpretations of existing laws

or regulations. The failure of the Group to appropriately manage and implement regulatory change, including

by failing to implement effective processes to comply with new regulations, has, in some instances, resulted in,

and could in the future result in, the Group failing to meet a compliance obligation. Further information about

the consequences of failing to meet a compliance obligation is set out in the section titled ‘Our businesses are

highly regulated and we have been or could be adversely affected by failing to comply with laws, regulations or

regulatory policy’ below.

Another consideration in managing regulatory change arises when regulation is introduced in one jurisdiction in

which we operate that conflicts with the way it is introduced in other jurisdictions in which we operate.

For further information about regulatory changes affecting the Group, refer to ‘Significant developments’ in

Section 1 and the sections ‘Critical accounting assumptions and estimates’ and ‘Future developments’ in Note 1 to

the financial statements.

Risk and risk management

1032019 Westpac Group Annual Report
1

2

3

4

Risk and risk management

1

2

3

4

Our businesses are highly regulated and we have been or could be adversely affected by failing to comply

with laws, regulations or regulatory policy

We are responsible for ensuring that we comply with all applicable legal and regulatory requirements and industry

codes of practice in the jurisdictions in which we operate or obtain funding, as well as meeting our ethical standards.

The Group is subject to compliance risk, which is the risk of legal or regulatory sanction or financial or reputational loss,

arising from our failure to abide by the compliance obligations required of us. This risk is exacerbated by the increasing

complexity and volume of regulation and can also arise where we interpret our obligations and rights differently to our

regulators or a Court. The potential for this to occur may be heightened in circumstances where regulation is untested

and/or not accompanied by extensive regulatory guidance.

The Group employs a compliance management system which is designed to identify, assess and manage

compliance risk. While this system is currently in place, it may not always have been or continue to be effective.

Breakdowns may occur in this system due, for example, to flaws in the design of controls or processes. This has

resulted in, and may in the future result in, potential breaches of our compliance obligations, as well as poor

customer outcomes.

The Group also depends on its employees, contractors, agents, authorised representatives and external service

providers to ‘do the right thing’ for it to meet its compliance obligations. Inappropriate conduct by these

individuals, such as neglecting to follow a policy or engaging in misconduct, could result in poor customer

outcomes and a failure by the Group to comply with compliance obligations.

The Group’s failure, or suspected failure, to comply with a compliance obligation could lead to a regulator

commencing surveillance or an investigation into the Group. This may, depending on the circumstances, result in

the regulator taking administrative or enforcement action against the Group and/or its representatives. Regulators

could seek to pursue civil or criminal proceedings, seeking substantial fines, civil penalties or other enforcement

outcomes. In addition, the failure or alleged failure of our competitors to comply with their obligations could lead

to increased regulatory scrutiny across the financial services sector.

In many cases, our regulators have broad powers. For example, under the Banking Act 1959 (Cth), APRA can, in

certain circumstances, issue a direction to us (such as a direction to comply with a prudential requirement, to

conduct an audit, to remove a Director, executive officer or employee, to take remedial action or not to undertake

transactions) or disqualify an ‘Accountable Person’ under the Banking and Executive Accountability Regime.

APRA also has the power to require us to hold additional capital, which they exercised earlier this year by applying

a $500 million overlay to our operational risk capital requirement following the completion of our self-assessment

into our frameworks and practices in relation to governance, culture and accountability. If the Group incurs

additional capital overlays in the future it may need to raise additional capital which could have an adverse impact

on our business, prospects, financial performance and financial condition.

The current political and regulatory environment that the Group is operating in has also seen (and may in the future

see) our regulators receive new powers. Recently, legislation was passed by the Australian Parliament that provided

ASIC with a product intervention power which enables ASIC to make orders that prevent issuers of financial

products from engaging in certain conduct.

In addition, legislation has been passed that materially increases the penalties that can be imposed for corporate

and financial sector misconduct. In particular, ASIC can commence civil penalty proceedings and seek significant

civil penalties against an Australian Financial Services licensee (such as Westpac) for failing to do all things

necessary to ensure that financial services provided under the licence are provided efficiently, honestly and fairly.

The Group may also face significant penalties for failing to comply with other obligations, such as those provided

for under the recently legislated Consumer Data Right. This trend towards increasingly severe penalties for failing

to meet compliance obligations could continue in the future and be expanded into other areas of regulation that

the Group is subject to.

Changes may also occur in the oversight approach of regulators, which could result in a regulator preferring its

enforcement powers over a more consultative approach. In recent years, there have been significant increases in

the nature and scale of regulatory investigations, enforcement actions and the quantum of fines issued by global

regulators.

This dynamic is apparent, with ASIC committing to conducting more enforcement actions against large financial

institutions and adopting a ‘why not litigate?’ enforcement stance. ASIC has also continued to implement its ‘Close

and Continuous Monitoring’ program, which has seen ASIC staff embedded within the institutions they supervise,

including Westpac.

APRA has publicly committed to a revised approach to enforcement as well. APRA has indicated that it will use

enforcement where appropriate to prevent and address serious prudential risks and hold entities and individuals to

account.

The current environment may see a shift in the nature of enforcement proceedings commenced by regulators. As

well as conducting more civil penalty proceedings, our regulators may be more likely to bring criminal proceedings

against institutions and/or their representatives in the future. Alternatively, regulators may elect to make criminal

referrals to the Commonwealth Department of Public Prosecutions or other prosecutorial bodies.

The provision of new powers to regulators, coupled with the increasingly active supervisory and enforcement

approaches adopted by them, increases the prospect of adverse regulatory action being brought against the

Group. Further, the severity and consequences of that action are now greater, given the expansion of penalties for

corporate and financial sector misconduct.

1042019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Risk and risk management

Regulatory action brought against the Group may expose the Group to an increased risk of litigation brought by

third parties (including through class action proceedings), which may require the Group to pay compensation to

third parties and/or undertake further remediation activities.

Regulatory investigations, inquiries, litigation, fines, penalties, infringement notices, revocation, suspension or

variation of conditions of relevant regulatory licences or other enforcement or administrative action or agreements

(such as enforceable undertakings) could, either individually or in aggregate with other regulatory action, adversely

affect our business, prospects, reputation, financial performance or financial condition. For further details about

regulatory matters that may affect the Group, refer to ‘Significant Developments’ in Section 1.

The failure to comply with financial crime obligations could have an adverse effect on our business and

reputation

The Group is subject to anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing (AML/CTF) laws, anti-bribery

and corruption laws, economic and trade sanctions laws and tax transparency laws in the jurisdictions in which

it operates. These laws can be complex and, in some circumstances, impose a diverse range of obligations. For

example, AML/CTF laws require Westpac and other regulated institutions to (amongst other things) undertake

customer identification and verification, conduct ongoing due diligence on customers, maintain and comply with

an AML/CTF program and undertake ongoing risk assessments. AML/CTF laws also require Westpac to report

certain matters and transactions to regulators (including in relation to International Funds Transfer Instructions,

Threshold Transaction Reports and Suspicious Matter Reports) and ensure that certain information is not disclosed

to third parties in a way that would contravene the ‘tipping off’ provisions in AML/CTF legislation.

In recent years there has been increased focus on compliance with financial crime obligations, with regulators

around the globe commencing large-scale investigations and taking enforcement action where they have identified

non-compliance (often seeking significant monetary penalties). Further, due to the large volume of transactions

that the Group processes, the undetected failure or the ineffective implementation, monitoring or remediation of a

system, policy, process or control (including in relation to a regulatory reporting obligation) has in some instances,

and could in the future result in, a significant number of breaches of AML/CTF obligations. This in turn could lead

to significant monetary penalties.

While the Group has systems, policies, processes and controls in place that are designed to manage its financial

crime obligations (including its reporting obligations), these have not always been, and may not in the future

always be effective. The Group is currently undertaking a multi-year program designed to address areas of control

weaknesses in its financial crime management framework and improve the management of this risk class.

If we fail, or where we have failed, to comply with these obligations, we could face regulatory enforcement action

such as litigation, significant fines, penalties and the revocation, suspension or variation of licence conditions.

As reported in the Group’s 2018 Annual Report, the Group self-reported to AUSTRAC a failure to report a large

number of ITFIs (as required under Australia’s AML/CTF Act). AUSTRAC has issued a number of detailed statutory

notices over the last year requiring information relating to the Group’s processes, procedures and oversight. These

notices relate to a range of matters including these IFTI reporting failures and associated potential failings related

to record keeping and obligations to obtain and pass on certain data in funds transfer instructions, as well as

correspondent banking due diligence, risk assessments and transaction monitoring. Further information is set out

in ‘Significant Developments’ in section 1 and in Note 27 to the financial statements.

Non-compliance with financial crime obligations could also lead to litigation commenced by third parties (including

class action proceedings) and cause reputational damage. These actions could, either individually or in aggregate,

adversely affect our business, prospects, reputation, financial performance or financial condition.

Reputational damage could harm our business and prospects

Our ability to attract and retain customers and our prospects could be adversely affected if our reputation is

damaged.

Reputation risk is the risk of loss of reputation, stakeholder confidence or public trust and standing. It arises where

there are differences between stakeholders’ current and emerging perceptions, beliefs and expectations and our

past, current and planned activities, processes, performance and behaviours.

There are various potential sources of reputational damage. Westpac’s reputation may be damaged where any of

its policies, processes, practices or behaviours result in a negative outcome for a customer or a class of customers.

Other potential sources of reputational damage include the failure to effectively manage risks in accordance with

our risk management frameworks , failure to comply with legal and regulatory requirements, adverse findings from

regulatory reviews (including Westpac-specific and industry-wide reviews), environmental, social and ethical issues,

failure of information security systems, technology failures, security breaches and inadequate record keeping which

may prevent Westpac from demonstrating that a past decision was appropriate at the time it was made.

Westpac may suffer reputational damage where its conduct, practices, behaviours or business activities do not

align with the evolving standards and expectations of the community, our regulators and other stakeholders.

As these expectations may exceed the standard required in order to comply with the law, Westpac may incur

reputational damage even where it has met its legal obligations. Our reputation could also be adversely affected by

the actions of the financial services industry in general or from the actions of our competitors, customers, suppliers,

joint-venture partners, strategic partners and other counterparties.

Furthermore, the risk of reputational damage may be heightened by factors such as the increasing use of social

media or the increasing prevalence of groups which seek to publicly challenge the Group’s strategy or approach to

aspects of its business.

1052019 Westpac Group Annual Report
1

2

3

4

Risk and risk management

1

2

3

4

Failure, or perceived failure, to appropriately address issues that could or do give rise to reputational risk could

also impact the regulatory change agenda, give rise to additional legal risk, subject us to regulatory investigations,

regulatory enforcement actions, fines and penalties or litigation brought by third parties (including class actions),

require us to remediate and compensate customers and incur remediation costs or harm our reputation among

customers, investors and the marketplace. This could lead to loss of business which could adversely affect our

business, prospects, financial performance or financial condition.

The Royal Commission has led to, and may continue to lead to, regulatory enforcement activity, litigation

and changes in laws, regulations or regulatory policy, and has resulted in, and may continue to result in,

ongoing reputational damage to the Group, all of which has and may continue to have an adverse effect

on our business and prospects

The Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry investigated

(amongst other things) whether any conduct, practices, behaviours or business activities engaged in by financial

services entities amounted to potential misconduct, or fell below community standards and expectations.

These investigations (including the public hearings, submissions, evidence and findings of the Royal Commission)

had, and may continue to have, an adverse impact on the Group’s reputation and potentially the financial

performance of the Group’s businesses. In addition, the Royal Commission’s findings have led to, and may

continue to lead in the future to, regulators commencing investigations and/or enforcement action against

financial institutions (including the Group). This environment has also resulted in an increase in class actions or

other litigation being commenced by the Group’s customers, including in relation to matters raised at the Royal

Commission. For further information about this risk, refer to the section titled ‘We have and could suffer losses due

to litigation (including class action proceedings)’ below.

In addition, the recommendations made in the Final Report of the Commission (which was publicly released on 4

February 2019) have resulted and will, depending on how its recommendations are implemented, result in further

changes to legislation, and further influence the policies and practices of our regulators. In some instances, this

has already had, and may continue to have in the future, an adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial

performance or financial condition.

The Royal Commission has also led to increased political or regulatory scrutiny of the financial industry in New

Zealand, and may continue to do so.

We have and could suffer losses due to litigation (including class action proceedings)

The Group (and individual entities within the Group) may, from time to time, be involved in legal proceedings,

regulatory actions or arbitration arising from the conduct of their business and the performance of their legal and

regulatory obligations. Proceedings could be commenced against the Group by a range of potential plaintiffs,

such as our customers, shareholders, suppliers and counterparties. These plaintiffs may commence proceedings

individually or they may commence class action proceedings.

In recent years, there has been an increase in the number of class action proceedings brought against financial

services companies (and other organisations more broadly), many of which have resulted in significant monetary

settlements. The risk of class action proceedings being commenced is heightened by findings from regulatory

investigations or inquiries (such as the Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Financial Services Industry),

adverse media, an adverse judgment or the settlement of proceedings brought by a regulator. Furthermore,

there is a risk that class action proceedings commenced against a competitor could lead to similar class action

proceedings being commenced against the Group.

The growth in third party litigation funding in Australia has also contributed to a recent increase in the number

of class actions being commenced in Australia. This trend may continue in light of recent court judgments which

have clarified the courts’ approach to liability and loss on certain types of class action claims. This clarification may

encourage plaintiffs, law firms and funders to bring and maintain class action proceedings, as well as potentially

improve the ability of plaintiffs to establish certain types of class action claims.

From time to time, class action proceedings are commenced against the Group. For further information about class

action proceedings that the Group is currently involved in, refer to Note 27 in the financial statements.

Litigation (including class action proceedings) may, either individually or in aggregate, adversely affect the Group’s

business, operations, prospects, reputation or financial condition. This risk is heightened by the recent increases

in the severity of penalties for certain breaches of the law. Such matters are subject to many uncertainties (for

example, the outcome may not be able to be predicted accurately). Furthermore, the Group’s ability to respond to

and defend litigation may be adversely affected by inadequate record keeping.

Depending on the outcome of any litigation, the Group may be required to comply with broad court orders,

including compliance orders, enforcement orders or otherwise pay money such as damages, fines, penalties or

legal costs.

The Group’s material contingent liabilities are described in Note 27 to the financial statements. There is a risk that these

contingent liabilities may be larger than anticipated or that additional litigation or other contingent liabilities may arise,

which could adversely affect our business, prospects, reputation, financial performance or financial condition.

We have suffered and could in the future suffer information security risks, including cyberattacks

The proliferation of new technologies, the increasing use of the internet and telecommunications to conduct

financial transactions and the growing sophistication and activities of attackers (including organised crime and

state-sponsored actors) have resulted in increased information security risks for major financial institutions such as

Westpac and our external service providers.

1062019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Risk and risk management

While Westpac has systems in place to protect against, detect and respond to cyberattacks, these systems have

not always been, and may not in the future always be effective. There can be no assurance that we will not suffer

losses from cyberattacks or other information security breaches. The Group may not be able to anticipate and

prevent a cyberattack, or it may not be able to implement effective measures to respond to a cyberattack in

progress. Further, there is a risk that the Group will not be able to rectify or minimise the damage resulting from a

cyberattack.

If the Group incurs a successful cyberattack, technology systems might fail to operate properly or become disabled

and it could result in the unauthorised release, gathering, monitoring, misuse, loss or destruction of confidential,

proprietary and other information of the Group, its employees, customers or third parties or otherwise adversely

impact network access, business operations or availability of services.

In addition, as cyber threats continue to evolve, we may be required to expend significant additional resources to

modify or enhance our systems or to investigate and remediate any vulnerabilities or incidents.

Our operations rely on the secure processing, storage and transmission of information on our computer systems

and networks, and the systems and networks of external suppliers. Although we implement measures to protect

the security, integrity and confidentiality of our information, there is a risk that the computer systems, software and

networks on which we rely may be subject to security breaches, unauthorised access, malicious software, external

attacks or internal breaches that could have an adverse impact on our confidential information or that of our

customers and counterparties.

Major banks in other jurisdictions have suffered security breaches from sophisticated cyberattacks. Our external

service providers, other parties that facilitate our business activities and financial platforms and infrastructure

(such as clearing houses, payment systems and exchanges) are also subject to the risk of cyberattacks. Any such

security breach could result in the loss of customers and business opportunities, significant disruption to Westpac’s

operations, misappropriation of Westpac’s confidential information and/or that of our customers and damage

to Westpac’s computers or systems and/or those of our customers. Such a security breach could also result in

reputational damage, claims for compensation and regulatory investigations and penalties, which could adversely

affect our business, prospects, financial performance or financial condition.

Our risk and exposure to such threats remains heightened because of the evolving nature of technology, Westpac’s

prominence within the financial services industry, the prominence of our customers (including those in the

government, mining and health sectors), increasing obligations to make data and information available to external

third parties and our plans to continue to improve and expand our internet and mobile banking infrastructure.

We could suffer losses due to technology failures or our inability to appropriately manage and upgrade

our technology

The reliability, integrity and security of our information and technology is crucial in supporting our customers’

banking requirements and meeting our compliance obligations and our regulators’ expectations.

While the Group has a number of processes in place to provide for and monitor the availability and recovery of

our systems, there is a risk that our information and technology systems might fail to operate properly or become

disabled, including as a result of events that are wholly or partially beyond our control.

If we incur a technology failure we may fail to meet a compliance obligation (such as the obligation to retain

records and data for requisite periods of time), or our customers may be adversely affected. This could potentially

result in reputational damage, remediation costs and a regulator commencing an investigation and/or taking

administrative or enforcement action against us. The overuse or overreliance on legacy or outdated systems may

heighten the risk of a technology failure occurring.

Further, in order to continue to deliver new products and services to customers, comply with our regulatory

obligations (such as obligations to report certain data and information to regulators) and meet the ongoing

expectations of our regulators and our customers, we need to regularly renew and enhance our technology. We

are constantly managing technology projects including projects to consolidate technology platforms, simplify

and enhance our technology and operations environment, assist us to comply with legal obligations, improve

productivity and provide for a better customer experience. Failure to implement these projects or manage

associated change effectively could result in cost overruns, unrealised productivity, operational instability, failure to

meet compliance obligations, reputational damage and/or result in the loss of market share to competitors. In turn,

this could place us at a competitive disadvantage and adversely affect our financial performance.

Adverse credit and capital market conditions or depositor preferences may significantly affect our ability

to meet funding and liquidity needs and may increase our cost of funding

We rely on deposits, and credit and capital markets, to fund our business and as a source of liquidity. Our liquidity

and costs of obtaining funding are related to credit and capital market conditions.

Global credit and capital markets can experience periods of extreme volatility, disruption and decreased liquidity

as was demonstrated during the Global Financial Crisis. While there have now been extended periods of stability in

these markets, the environment remains unpredictable. The main risks we face are damage to market confidence,

changes to the access and cost of funding and a slowing in global activity or other impacts on entities with whom

we do business.

As of 30 September 2019, approximately 30% of our total funding originated from domestic and international

wholesale markets. Of this, around 65% was sourced outside Australia and New Zealand. Customer deposits

provide around 63% of total funding. Customer deposits held by Westpac are comprised of both term deposits

which can be withdrawn after a certain period of time and at call deposits which can be withdrawn at any time.

1072019 Westpac Group Annual Report
1

2

3

4

Risk and risk management

1

2

3

4

A shift in investment preferences could result in deposit withdrawals by customers which could increase our need

for funding from other, potentially less stable, or more expensive, forms of funding.

If market conditions deteriorate due to economic, financial, political or other reasons, there may also be a loss of

confidence in bank deposits and we could experience unexpected deposit withdrawals. In this situation our funding

costs may be adversely affected and our liquidity and our funding and lending activities may be constrained.

If our current sources of funding prove to be insufficient, we may be forced to seek alternative financing. The

availability of such alternative financing, and the terms on which it may be available, will depend on a variety

of factors, including prevailing market conditions, the availability of credit, our credit ratings and credit market

capacity. Even if available, these alternatives may be more expensive or on unfavourable terms, which could

adversely affect our financial performance, liquidity, capital resources or financial condition. There is no assurance

that we will be able to obtain adequate funding, do so at acceptable prices, or that we will be able to recover any

additional costs.

If Westpac is unable to source appropriate funding, we may also be forced to reduce our lending or begin selling

liquid securities. Such actions may adversely impact our business, prospects, liquidity, capital resources, financial

performance or financial condition. If Westpac is unable to source appropriate funding for an extended period, or

if it can no longer sell liquid securities, there is a risk that Westpac will be unable to pay its debts as and when they

become due and payable.

Westpac enters into collateralised derivative obligations, which may require Westpac to post additional collateral

based on movements in market rates, which has the potential to adversely affect Westpac’s liquidity or ability to

use derivative obligations to hedge its interest rate, currency and other financial instrument risks.

For a more detailed description of liquidity risk, refer to ‘Funding and liquidity risk’ in Note 21 to the financial

statements.

Sovereign risk may destabilise financial markets adversely

Sovereign risk is the risk that governments will default on their debt obligations, will be unable to refinance their

debts as they fall due or will nationalise parts of their economy including assets of financial institutions such as

Westpac. Sovereign defaults could negatively impact the value of our holdings of high quality liquid assets. There

may also be a cascading effect to other markets and countries, the consequences of which, while difficult to

predict, may be similar to or worse than those experienced during the Global Financial Crisis. Such an event could

destabilise global financial markets, adversely affecting our liquidity, financial performance or financial condition.

Failure to maintain credit ratings could adversely affect our cost of funds, liquidity, competitive position

and access to capital markets

Credit ratings are independent opinions on our creditworthiness. Our credit ratings can affect the cost and

availability of our funding from capital markets and other funding sources and they may be important to customers

or counterparties when evaluating our products and services. Therefore, maintaining high credit ratings is

important.

The credit ratings assigned to us by rating agencies are based on an evaluation of a number of factors, including

our financial strength, the quality of our governance, structural considerations regarding the Australian financial

system and the credit rating of the Australian Government. A credit rating downgrade could be driven by a

downgrade of the Australian Government, the occurrence of one or more of the other risks identified in this section

or by other events including changes to the methodologies used by the rating agencies to determine ratings.

A downgrade or series of downgrades to our credit ratings could have an adverse effect on our cost of funds

and related margins, collateral requirements, liquidity, competitive position and our access to capital markets. The

extent and nature of these impacts would depend on various factors, including the extent of any ratings change,

whether our ratings differ among agencies (split ratings) and whether any ratings changes also impact our

competitors or the sector.

A systemic shock in relation to the Australian, New Zealand or other financial systems could have adverse

consequences for Westpac or its customers or counterparties that would be difficult to predict and

respond to

There is a risk that a major systemic shock could occur that causes an adverse impact on the Australian,

New Zealand or other financial systems.

As outlined above, during the past decade the financial services industry and capital markets have been, and may

continue to be, adversely affected by market volatility, global economic conditions, geopolitical instability (such

as threats of or actual conflict occurring around the world) and political developments. In particular, there are

significant and ongoing global political developments that have the potential to impact major global economies,

including Brexit and the introduction of tariffs and other protectionist measures by various countries, such as

the US and China. A shock to one of the major global economies could again result in currency and interest rate

fluctuations and operational disruptions that negatively impact the Group.

Any such market and economic disruptions could adversely affect financial institutions such as Westpac because

consumer and business spending may decrease, unemployment may rise and demand for the products and

services we provide may decline, thereby reducing our earnings. These conditions may also affect the ability of

our borrowers to repay their loans or our counterparties to meet their obligations, causing us to incur higher credit

losses and affect investors’ willingness to invest in the Group. These events could also result in the undermining of

confidence in the financial system, reducing liquidity, impairing our access to funding and impairing our customers

and counterparties and their businesses. If this were to occur, our business, prospects, financial performance or

financial condition could be adversely affected.

1082019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Risk and risk management

The nature and consequences of any such event are difficult to predict and there can be no certainty that we could

respond effectively to any such event.

Declines in asset markets could adversely affect our operations or profitability

Declines in Australian, New Zealand or other asset markets, including equity, residential and commercial property

and other asset markets, could adversely affect our operations and profitability.

Declining asset prices also impact our wealth management business. Earnings in our wealth management business

are, in part, dependent on asset values because we typically receive fees based on the value of securities and/or

assets held or managed. A decline in asset prices could negatively impact the earnings of this business.

Declining asset prices could also impact customers and counterparties and the value of security (including

residential and commercial property) we hold against loans and derivatives. This may impact our ability to recover

amounts owing to us if customers or counterparties were to default. It may also affect our level of provisioning

which in turn impacts our profitability and financial condition.

Our business is substantially dependent on the Australian and New Zealand economies

Our revenues and earnings are dependent on economic activity and the level of financial services our customers

require. In particular, lending is dependent on various factors including economic growth, business investment,

business and consumer sentiment, levels of employment, interest rates, asset prices and trade flows in the

countries in which we operate.

We conduct the majority of our business in Australia and New Zealand and, consequently, our performance

is influenced by the level and cyclical nature of lending in these countries. These factors are in turn impacted

by both domestic and international economic conditions, natural disasters and political events. A significant

decrease in Australian and New Zealand housing valuations could adversely impact our home lending activities

because borrowers with loans in excess of their property value show a higher propensity to default. In the event

of defaults our security may be eroded, causing us to incur higher credit losses. The demand for our home lending

products may also decline due to adverse changes in tax legislation (such as changes to tax rates, concessions or

deductions), regulatory requirements or other buyer concerns about decreases in values.

Adverse changes to economic and business conditions in Australia and New Zealand and other countries such as

China, India, Japan and the US could also adversely affect the Australian economy and our customers. In particular,

due to the current economic relationship between Australia and China, particularly in the mining and resources

sectors, a slowdown in China’s economic growth, including as the result of the implementation of tariffs or other

protectionist trade measures, could negatively impact the Australian economy. Changes in commodity prices,

Chinese government policies and broader economic conditions could, in turn, result in reduced demand for our

products and services and affect the ability of our borrowers to repay their loans. If this were to occur, it could

negatively impact our business, prospects, financial performance or financial condition.

Monetary policy can also significantly affect the Group. Interest rate settings (including low or negative rates),

as well as other actions taken by central banks (such as quantitative easing), may adversely affect our cost of

funds, the value of our lending and investments and our margins. Monetary policies also impact the broader

economic conditions of the various jurisdictions that the Group operates or obtains funding in. These policies

could affect demand for our products and services and/or have a negative impact on the Group’s customers and

counterparties, potentially increasing the risk that they will default on their obligations to the Group. All of these

factors could adversely affect our business, prospects, financial performance or financial condition.

An increase in defaults in credit exposures could adversely affect our liquidity, capital resources, financial

performance or financial condition

Credit risk is the risk of financial loss where a customer or counterparty fails to meet their financial obligations to

Westpac. It is a significant risk and arises primarily from our lending activities.

We establish provisions for credit impairment based on current information and our expectations. If economic

conditions deteriorate outside of our expectations, some customers and/or counterparties could experience higher

levels of financial stress and we may experience a significant increase in defaults and write-offs, and be required

to increase our provisioning. Such events would diminish available capital and could adversely affect our liquidity,

capital resources, financial performance or financial condition.

Credit risk also arises from certain derivative, clearing and settlement contracts we enter into, and from our

dealings with, and holdings of, debt securities issued by other banks, financial institutions, companies, clearing

houses, governments and government bodies, the financial conditions of which may be affected to varying degrees

by economic conditions in global financial markets.

For a discussion of our risk management procedures, including the management of credit risk, refer to the ‘Risk

management’ section and Note 21 in the financial statements.

We face intense competition in all aspects of our business

The financial services industry is highly competitive. We compete, both domestically and internationally, with a

range of firms, including retail and commercial banks, asset managers, investment banking firms, brokerage firms,

other financial service firms and businesses in other industries with emerging financial services aspirations. This

includes specialist competitors that may not be subject to the same capital and regulatory requirements and

therefore may be able to operate more efficiently. Digital technologies are changing consumer behaviour and the

competitive environment. The use of digital channels by customers to conduct their banking continues to rise and

emerging competitors are increasingly utilising new technologies and seeking to disrupt existing business models,

1092019 Westpac Group Annual Report
1

2

3

4

Risk and risk management

1

2

3

4

including in relation to digital payment services. The Group faces competition from established providers of

financial services as well as from banking businesses developed by non-financial services companies.

The competitive environment may also change as a result of legislative reforms.

If we are unable to compete effectively in the increasingly competitive environment in which our various businesses

operate, our market share may decline. This may adversely affect us by diverting business to our competitors or

creating pressure to lower margins and fees.

Increased competition for deposits could also increase our cost of funding and lead us to seek access to other

types of funding or reduce lending. We rely on bank deposits to fund a significant portion of our balance sheet and

deposits have been a relatively stable source of funding. We compete with banks and other financial services firms

for such deposits. To the extent that we are not able to successfully compete for deposits, we would be forced to

rely more heavily on other, potentially less stable or more expensive forms of funding, or reduce lending.

We are also dependent on our ability to offer products and services that match evolving customer preferences.

If we are not successful in developing or introducing new products and services or responding or adapting to

changes in customer preferences and habits, we may lose customers to our competitors. This could adversely

affect our business, prospects, financial performance or financial condition.

For more detail on how we address competitive pressures refer to the section titled Competition in the Directors’

Report in Section 1.

We could suffer losses due to market volatility

We are exposed to market risk as a consequence of our trading activities in financial markets, our defined benefit

plan and through the asset and liability management of our financial position. This is the risk of an adverse impact

on earnings resulting from changes in market factors, such as foreign exchange rates, commodity prices, equity

prices, and interest rates including the potential for low or negative interest rates. This includes interest rate risk in

the banking book, such as the risk to interest income from a mismatch between the duration of assets and liabilities

that arises in the normal course of business activities.

Changes in market factors could be driven by a number of developments. As an example, in July 2017, the FCA

which regulates the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”), announced that it would not require panel banks to

continue to submit rates for the calculation of the LIBOR benchmark after 2021. Accordingly, the continuation of

LIBOR in its current form will not be guaranteed after 2021, and it appears likely that LIBOR will be discontinued

or modified by 2021. Any such developments or future changes in the administration of LIBOR or any other

benchmarks could result in adverse consequences to the return on, value of and market for securities and other

instruments whose returns are linked to any such benchmark, including those securities or other instruments issued

by the Group.

If we were to suffer substantial losses due to any market volatility (including changes in the return on, value of

or market for, securities or other instruments) it may adversely affect our business, prospects, liquidity, capital

resources, financial performance or financial condition. For a discussion of our risk management procedures,

including the management of market risk, refer to the ‘Risk management’ section.

We have and could suffer losses due to operational risks

Operational risk is the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, people and systems

or from external events. It also includes, among other things, reputational risk, technology risk, model risk and

outsourcing risk, as well as the risk of business disruption due to external events such as natural disasters,

environmental hazard, damage to critical utilities, and targeted activism and protest activity. While we have policies,

processes and controls in place to manage these risks, these may not always have been, or continue to be effective.

Ineffective processes and controls have resulted in, and could in the future result in an adverse outcome for

Westpac’s customers. For example, a process breakdown could result in a customer not receiving a product on

the terms and conditions, or at the pricing, they agreed to. In addition, inadequate record keeping may prevent

Westpac from demonstrating that a past decision was appropriate at the time it was made or that a particular

action or activity was undertaken. If this was to occur, Westpac may incur significant costs in paying refunds and

compensation to customers, as well as remediating any underlying process breakdown. Failed processes could

also result in Westpac incurring losses because it is not able to enforce its contractual rights. This could arise

in circumstances where Westpac did not correctly document its rights or failed to perfect a security interest.

These types of operational failures, may also result in increased regulatory scrutiny and depending on the nature

of the failure and its impact, result in a regulator potentially commencing an investigation and/or taking other

enforcement, administrative or supervisory action.

We could incur losses from fraudulent applications for loans or from incorrect or fraudulent payments and

settlements, particularly real-time payments. Fraudulent conduct can also emerge from external parties seeking to

access the bank’s systems and customers’ accounts. If systems, procedures and protocols for managing fraud fail,

or are ineffective, they could lead to losses which could adversely affect our customers, as well as our business,

prospects, reputation, financial performance or financial condition.

Accurate and complete data is critical to ensure that Westpac’s systems (both customer facing and back-office)

and financial reporting processes operate effectively. In some areas of its business and operations, Westpac is

1102019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Risk and risk management

affected by poor data quality. This has arisen and could in the future arise in a number of ways, including through

inadequacies in systems, processes and policies. This could lead to deficiencies or failings in customer service,

risk management, financial reporting (including in the calculation of risk weighted assets), credit systems and

processes, compliance with legal obligations (including obligations to provide data to regulators) and also result

in poor decision making, including in relation to the provision of credit and the terms on which it is provided. Poor

data quality could affect the ability of Westpac to improve systems and processes. Westpac is also exposed to

model risk, being the risk of loss arising from errors or inadequacies in data or a model, or in the control and use of

a model.

Westpac is required to retain and access data and documentation for specific retention periods in order to satisfy

its compliance obligations. In some cases, Westpac also retains data to enable it to demonstrate that a past

decision was appropriate at the time it was made. Failings in systems, processes and policies could all adversely

affect Westpac’s ability to retain and access data.

In recent times, financial services entities have been increasingly sharing data with third parties, such as suppliers

and regulators (both domestic and offshore), in order to conduct their business activities and meet regulatory

obligations. A breakdown in a process or control related to the transfer, storage or protection of data transferred

to a third party, or the failure of a third party to use and handle this data correctly, could result in the Group failing

to meet a compliance obligation (including any relevant privacy obligations) and/or have an adverse impact on our

customers and the Group.

Westpac also relies on a number of suppliers, both in Australia and overseas, to provide services to it and its

customers. Failure by these suppliers to deliver services as required could disrupt services and adversely impact

Westpac’s operations, profitability or reputation. The Group could also be adversely affected by events that cause

disruption within the banking and financial services industry. For example, there is a risk that if central banks adopt

negative interest rates in the future, the technology systems used by the Group, its counterparties and/or financial

infrastructure providers may fail to operate correctly and this may cause loss or damage to the Group and/or its

counterparties.

Operational risks can impact our reputation and result in financial losses (including through decreased demand for

our products and services) which would adversely affect our financial performance or financial condition.

For a discussion of our risk management procedures, including the management of operational risk, refer to the

‘Risk management’ section.

Operational risk, technology risk, conduct risk or compliance risk events have required, and could in the

future require, Westpac to undertake customer remediation activity

Westpac relies on a large number of policies, processes, procedures, systems and people to conduct its business.

Breakdowns or deficiencies in one of these areas (arising from one or more operational risk, technology risk,

conduct risk or compliance risk events) have resulted, and could in the future result in, adverse outcomes for

customers which Westpac is required to remediate.

These events could require the Group to incur significant remediation costs (which may include compensation

payments to customers and costs associated with correcting the underlying issue) and result in reputational

damage.

There are significant challenges and risks involved in customer remediation activities. Westpac’s ability to

investigate an adverse customer outcome that may require remediation could be impeded if the issue is a legacy

matter spanning beyond our record retention period, or if our record keeping is otherwise inadequate. Depending

on the nature of the issue, it may be difficult to quantify and scope the remediation activity.

Determining how to properly and fairly compensate customers can also be a complicated exercise involving

numerous stakeholders, such as the affected customers, regulators and industry bodies. The Group’s proposed

approach to a remediation may be affected by a number of events, such as a group of affected customers

commencing class action proceedings on behalf of the broader population of affected customers, or a regulator

exercising their powers to require that a particular approach to remediation be taken. These factors could impact

the timeframe for completing the remediation activity, potentially resulting in Westpac failing to execute the

remediation in a timely manner. A failure of this type could lead to a regulator commencing enforcement action

against the Group. The ineffective or slow completion of a remediation also exposes the Group to reputational

damage, with the Group potentially being criticised by regulators, affected customers, the media and other

stakeholders, resulting in reputational damage.

The significant challenges and risks involved in scoping and executing remediations in a timely way also create the

potential for remediation costs actually incurred to be higher than those initially estimated by the Group.

If the Group cannot effectively scope, quantify or implement a remediation activity in a timely way, there could be

a negative impact on our business, prospects, reputation, financial performance or financial condition.

We have and could suffer losses due to conduct risk

Conduct risk is the risk that our provision of services and products results in unsuitable or unfair outcomes for

our stakeholders or undermines market integrity. Conduct risk could occur through the provision of products and

services to our customers that do not meet their needs or do not support market integrity, as well as the poor

conduct of our employees, contractors, agents, authorised representatives and external service providers, which

could include deliberate attempts by such individuals to circumvent Westpac’s controls, processes and procedures.

This could occur through a failure to meet professional obligations to specific clients (including fiduciary and

suitability requirements), poor product design and implementation, failure to adequately consider customer needs

1112019 Westpac Group Annual Report
1

2

3

4

Risk and risk management

1

2

3

4

or selling products and services outside of customer target markets. Conduct risk may also arise where there has

been a failure to adequately provide a product or services that we had agreed to provide a customer.

While we have frameworks, policies, processes and controls that are designed to manage poor conduct outcomes,

these policies and processes may not always have been or continue to be effective. The failure of these policies

and processes could result in financial losses and reputational damage and this could adversely affect our business,

prospects, financial performance or financial condition.

We could suffer losses and our business has been and could be adversely affected by the failure to adopt

and implement effective risk management

We have implemented risk management strategies, policies and internal controls involving processes and

procedures intended to identify, monitor and manage risks facing the Group. However, our risk management

framework has not always been, or may not in the future prove to be, effective.

This could be because the design of the framework may be inadequate, which could result in key information

not being provided to decision-makers in the right form and in a timely manner, or because of weaknesses in

underlying data. There is also the possibility that key risk management policies, controls and processes may be

ineffective, either due to inadequacies in their design, or because of the poor implementation of these policies,

controls and processes.

There are also inherent limitations with any risk management framework as there may exist, or emerge in the

future, risks that we have not anticipated or identified and our controls may not be effective.

Risk management frameworks may also prove ineffective because of weaknesses in risk culture, which may result

in risks and control weaknesses not being identified, escalated and acted upon. Further, while the development of

appropriate remuneration structures can play an important role in supporting a sound risk culture, a deficiency in

the design or operation of our remuneration structures could have a negative effect, potentially resulting in staff

engaging in excessive risk taking behaviours.

Risk management failings of the type outlined above could adversely the Group in numerous ways, with the

Group potentially being exposed to higher levels of risk than expected, which may result in the Group incurring

unexpected losses, breaches of compliance obligations and reputational damage.

As part of the Group’s risk management framework, the Group measures and monitors risks against its risk

appetite. Where the Group identifies a risk as being out-of-appetite, the Group needs to take steps to bring this

risk back into appetite in a timely way. However, the Group may not always be able to achieve this within proposed

timeframes. This may occur because, for example, the Group experiences delays in enhancing its information

technology systems to better manage the out-of-appetite risk, or in recruiting sufficient numbers of appropriately

trained staff to undertake required activities. It is also possible that, because of external factors beyond the Group’s

control, certain risks may be inherently outside of appetite for periods of time. In addition, the Group is required to

periodically review its risk management framework to determine whether it remains appropriate.

If the Group is unable to bring risks back into appetite, or if it is determined that the Group’s risk management

framework is no longer appropriate, the Group may incur unexpected losses and be required to undertake

considerable remedial work. The failure to remedy this situation could result in increased scrutiny from regulators,

who could take supervisory action such as requiring the Group to hold additional capital or directing the Group

to spend money to enhance its’ risk management systems and controls. The Group has been adversely affected

by weaknesses in risk management systems and controls in the recent past, with APRA requiring Westpac to hold

additional capital following the completion of its Compliance, Governance and Accountability self-assessment.

Inadequacies in addressing risks or in the Group’s risk management framework could also result in the Group failing

to meet a compliance obligation and/or financial losses.

If any of our governance or risk management processes and procedures prove ineffective or inadequate or are

otherwise not appropriately implemented, we could suffer unexpected losses and reputational damage which

could adversely affect our business, prospects, financial performance or financial condition.

For a discussion of our risk management procedures, refer to the ‘Risk management’ section.

The Group’s failure to recruit and retain key executives, employees and Directors may have adverse effects

on our business

Key executives, employees and Directors play an integral role in the operation of Westpac’s business and its pursuit

of its strategic objectives. The unexpected departure of an individual in a key role, or the Group’s failure to recruit

and retain appropriately skilled and qualified persons into these roles, could each have an adverse effect on our

business, prospects, reputation, financial performance or financial condition.

Climate change may have adverse effects on our business

We, our customers and external suppliers, may be adversely affected by the physical risks of climate change,

including increases in temperatures, sea levels, and the frequency and severity of adverse climatic events including

fires, storms, floods and droughts. These effects, whether acute or chronic in nature, may directly impact us and

our customers through reputational damage, environmental factors, insurance risk and business disruption and may

have an adverse impact on financial performance (including through an increase in defaults in credit exposures).

Initiatives to mitigate or respond to adverse impacts of climate change may impact market and asset prices,

economic activity, and customer behaviour, particularly in geographic locations and industry sectors adversely

affected by these changes. Failure to effectively manage these transition risks could adversely affect our business,

prospects, reputation, financial performance or financial condition.

1122019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Risk and risk management

We could suffer losses due to environmental factors

We and our customers operate businesses and hold assets in a diverse range of geographic locations. Any

significant environmental change or external event (including fire, storm, flood, earthquake, pandemic, civil unrest

or terrorism) in any of these locations has the potential to disrupt business activities, impact on our operations,

damage property and otherwise affect the value of assets held in the affected locations and our ability to recover

amounts owing to us. In addition, such an event could have an adverse impact on economic activity, consumer and

investor confidence, or the levels of volatility in financial markets, all of which could adversely affect our business,

prospects, financial performance or financial condition.

We could suffer losses due to insurance risk

We have exposure to insurance risk in our life insurance, general insurance and lenders mortgage insurance

businesses, which may adversely affect our business, operations or financial condition.

Insurance risk is the risk in our licensed regulated insurance entities of lapses being greater than expected, or

the costs of claims being greater than expected due to a failure in product design, underwriting, reinsurance

arrangements or an increase in the severity and/or frequency of insured events.

In the life insurance business, risk arises primarily through mortality (death) and morbidity (illness and injury) risks,

the costs of claims relating to those risks being greater than was anticipated when pricing those risks and policy

lapses (including through an unexpected or sustained increase in the rate of policy lapses).

In the general insurance business, insurance risk arises mainly through environmental factors (including storms,

floods and bushfires) and other calamities, such as earthquakes, tsunamis and volcanic activity, as well as general

variability in home and contents insurance claim amounts. The frequency and severity of external events such

as natural disasters is difficult to predict and it is possible that the amounts we reserve for potential losses from

existing events, such as those arising from natural disaster events, may not be adequate to cover actual claims that

may arise.

In the lenders mortgage insurance business, insurance risk arises primarily from unexpected downturns in

economic conditions leading to higher levels of mortgage defaults from unemployment or other economic factors.

If our reinsurance arrangements are ineffective, this could lead to greater risk, and more losses than anticipated.

There is also a risk that we will not be able to renew an expiring reinsurance arrangement on similar terms,

including in relation to the cost, duration and amount of reinsurance cover provided under that arrangement.

Changes in critical accounting estimates and judgements could expose the Group to losses

The Group is required to make estimates, assumptions and judgements when applying accounting policies and

preparing its financial statements, particularly in connection with the calculation of provisions (including those

related to remediations or credit losses) and the determination of the fair value of financial instruments. A change

in a critical accounting estimate, assumption and/or judgement resulting from new information or from changes in

circumstances or experience could result in the Group incurring losses greater than those anticipated or provided

for. This may have an adverse effect on the Group’s financial performance, financial condition and reputation. The

Group’s financial performance and financial condition may also be impacted by changes to accounting standards

or to generally accepted accounting principles.

We could suffer losses due to impairment of capitalised software, goodwill and other intangible assets

that may adversely affect our business, operations or financial condition

In certain circumstances Westpac may be exposed to a reduction in the value of intangible assets. As at

30 September 2019, Westpac carried goodwill principally related to its investments in Australia, other intangible

assets principally relating to assets recognised on acquisition of subsidiaries and capitalised software balances.

Westpac is required to assess the recoverability of the goodwill and other intangible asset balances on at least

an annual basis or wherever an indicator of impairment exists. For this purpose, Westpac uses a discounted cash

flow calculation. Changes in the methodology or assumptions upon which the calculation is based, together with

changes in expected future cash flows, could materially impact this assessment, resulting in the potential write-off

of part or all of the intangible assets.

In the event that an asset is no longer in use, or its value has been reduced or that its estimated useful life has

declined, an impairment will be recorded, adversely impacting the Group’s financial condition. The estimates and

assumptions used in assessing the useful life of an asset can be affected by a range of factors including changes in

strategy and the rate of external changes in technology and regulatory requirements.

We could suffer losses if we fail to syndicate or sell down underwritten securities

As a financial intermediary, we underwrite listed and unlisted debt and equity securities. Underwriting activities

include the development of solutions for corporate and institutional customers who need capital and investor

customers who have an appetite for certain investment products. We may guarantee the pricing and placement of

these facilities. We could suffer losses if we fail to syndicate or sell down our risk to other market participants. This

risk is more pronounced in times of heightened market volatility.

1132019 Westpac Group Annual Report
1

2

3

4

Risk and risk management

1

2

3

4

Certain strategic decisions may have adverse effects on our business

Westpac, at times, evaluates and may implement strategic decisions and objectives including diversification,

innovation, divestment or business expansion initiatives.

The expansion or integration of a new business, or entry into a new business, can be complex and costly and may

require Westpac to comply with additional local or foreign regulatory requirements which may carry additional

risks.

Westpac also acquires and invests in businesses owned and operated by external parties. These transactions

involve a number of risks for the Group. For example, Westpac may incur financial losses if a business it invests

in does not perform as anticipated or subsequently proves to be overvalued at the time that the transaction was

entered into.

In addition, we may be unable to successfully divest businesses or assets. These activities may, for a variety of

reasons, not deliver the anticipated positive business results and could have a negative impact on our business,

prospects, reputation, engagement with regulators, financial performance or financial condition.

Electing not to pursue a course of action can have an adverse effect on the Group. If Westpac fails to appropriately

respond to changes in the business environment it operates in (including changes related to economic, geopolitical,

regulatory, technological, social and competitive factors) this could have a range of adverse effects on the Group’s

business, such as being unable to increase or maintain market share as well as creating pressure on margins and

fees, any of which could have a negative impact on the Group’s business, prospects, financial performance or

financial condition.

Risk management

At Westpac, our risk management framework is designed to help achieve our vision to be one of the world’s great

service companies, helping our customers, communities and people to prosper and grow, sustainably and within

risk appetite. Our risk management strategy is to deliver effective risk management outcomes through the robust

execution of our risk management framework.

Effective risk management outcomes mean that we:

• deliver suitable, fair and clear outcomes for our customers that support market integrity;

• protect Westpac Group’s depositors, policyholders and investors by maintaining a balance sheet with sound

credit quality and buffers over regulatory minimums; and

• meet our regulatory and statutory obligations.

The Risk Management Framework (RMF) and Risk Management Strategy (RMS) is approved by the Board

following review and recommended by the Board Risk and Compliance Committee (BRCC) on an annual basis or

more frequently where required by a material business or strategy change or a material change to the Group’s risk

profile.

For further information regarding the role and responsibilities of the BRCC and other Board committees in managing

risk, refer to Westpac’s 2019 Corporate Governance Statement available at www.westpac.com.au/corpgov.

The Westpac Board (the Board) is ultimately responsible for our risk management framework and the oversight

of its operation by management. The Board has delegated the oversight of the RMF and its implementation to the

Chief Risk Officer (CRO) as the Accountable Executive.

The Chief Executive Officer (CEO) is the Accountable Executive for the RMS and oversees its implementation

by business units and functions, including in relation to customers, shareholders and Westpac employees and

contractors.

We adopt a Three Lines of Defence model to ensure we practice end-to-end management of risk, within which all

employees play an active role. This necessitates co-operation between businesses and functions, such that there

are no gaps in risk coverage.

Following the conclusion of the Culture, Governance and Accountability review conducted at the request of APRA,

Westpac is conducting a review of, and upgrades to, its end to end risk management capabilities. This is part of an

ongoing program of work that spans both financial and non-financial risk. Two of the key steps under this complex,

multi-year initiative are a renewed focus on the implementation of our three lines of defence model and the

implementation of a new Risk Management Framework, both of which are underway.

Westpac believes that investing in and enhancing end to end risk management capabilities are essential

imperatives. Recent reviews have identified various policies, systems, data, and risk capabilities which require

improvement. A detailed implementation plan is being designed to facilitate these improvements as soon as

possible, including hiring additional experts in areas such as operational risk, stress testing, modelling, financial

crime, risk systems and data management.

For a discussion of the risks to which Westpac is exposed, and its policies to manage these risks, refer to Westpac’s

Corporate Governance Statement and Note 21 to the financial statements.

1142019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Risk and risk management

Credit risk

Credit risk is the risk of financial loss where a customer or counterparty fails to meet their financial obligations to Westpac.

We have a framework and supporting policies for managing the credit risk associated with lending across our

business divisions. The framework and policies encompass all stages of the credit cycle – origination, evaluation,

approval, documentation, settlement, ongoing administration and problem management. For example, we have

established product-based standards for lending to individuals, with key controls including minimum serviceability

standards and maximum loan to security value ratios. We offer residential property loans to both owner-occupiers

and investors at both fixed and variable rates, secured by a mortgage over the property or other acceptable

collateral. Where we lend to higher loan to value ratios, we typically also require lenders mortgage insurance.

Similarly, we have established criteria for business, commercial, corporate and institutional lending, which can

vary by industry segment. In this area we focus on the performance of key financial risk ratios, including interest

coverage, debt serviceability and balance sheet structure. When providing finance to smaller business, commercial

and corporate borrowers we typically obtain security, such as a mortgage over property and/or a general security

agreement over business assets. For larger corporates and institutions, we typically also require compliance with

selected financial ratios and undertakings and may hold security. In respect of commercial property lending, we

maintain loan origination and ongoing risk management standards, including specialised management for higher

value loans. We consider factors such as the nature, location, quality and expected demand for the asset, tenancy

profile and experience and quality of management. We actively monitor the Australian and New Zealand property

markets and the composition of our commercial property loan book across the Group.

The extension of credit is underpinned by the Group’s Principles of Responsible Lending. This is reflected in our

commitment to comply with all local legislation, codes of practice and relevant guidelines and obligations to

market our products responsibly and stay in touch with the expectations of customers and the community.

Refer to Note 21 to the financial statements for details of our credit risk management policies.

Provisions for expected credit losses/impairment charges on loans

For information on the basis for determining the provision for expected credit losses/impairment charges on loans

refer to ‘Critical accounting assumptions and estimates’ in Note 13 to the financial statements.

Credit risk concentrations

We monitor our credit portfolio to manage risk concentrations. At 30 September 2019, our exposure to consumers

comprised 72% (2018: 72%, 2017: 72%) of our on-balance sheet loans and 59% (2018: 59%, 2017: 59%) of total credit

commitments. At 30 September 2019, 92% (2018: 92%, 2017: 92%) of our exposure to consumers was supported by

residential real estate mortgages. The consumer category includes owner-occupier and investment property loans

to individuals, credit cards, personal loans, overdrafts and lines of credit. Our consumer credit risks are diversified,

with substantial consumer market share in every state and territory in Australia, New Zealand and the Pacific

region. Moreover, these customers service their debts with incomes derived from a wide range of occupations, in

city as well as country areas.

Exposures to businesses, government and other financial institutions are classified into a number of industry

clusters based on groupings of related Australian and New Zealand Standard Industrial Classification (ANZSIC)

codes and are monitored against industry risk limits. The level of industry risk is measured and monitored on a

dynamic basis. We also control the concentration risks that can arise from large exposures to individual borrowers

1152019 Westpac Group Annual Report
1

2

3

4

Risk and risk management

1

2

3

4

Funding and liquidity risk

Funding and liquidity risk is the risk that Westpac cannot meet its payment obligations or that it does not have the

appropriate amount, tenor and composition of funding and liquidity to support its assets. Westpac has a Liquidity

Risk Management Framework which sets out Westpac’s funding and liquidity risk appetite, roles and responsibilities

of key people managing funding and liquidity risk within Westpac, risk reporting and control processes and limits

and targets used to manage Westpac’s balance sheet.

Refer to Note 21 to the financial statements for a more detailed discussion of our liquidity risk management policies.

Westpac debt programs and issuing shelves

Access in a timely and flexible manner to a diverse range of debt markets and investors is provided by the

following programs and issuing shelves as at 30 September 2019:

Program LimitIssuer(s)Program/Issuing Shelf Type

Australia

No limitWBCDebt Issuance Program

Euro Market

USD 2.5 billionWBCEuro Transferable Certificate of Deposit Program

USD 20 billionWBC/WSNZL

1

Euro Commercial Paper and Certificate of Deposit Program

USD 70 billionWBCEuro Medium Term Note Program

USD 10 billionWSNZL

1

Euro Medium Term Note Program

USD 40 billionWBC

2

Global Covered Bond Program

EUR 5 billionWSNZL

3

Global Covered Bond Program

Japan

JPY 750 billionWBCSamurai shelf

JPY 750 billionWBCUridashi shelf

United States

USD 45 billionWBCUS Commercial Paper Program

USD 10 billionWSNZL

1

US Commercial Paper Program

USD 35 billionWBCUS Medium Te

[TRUNCATED]

Data sourced from publicly available filings. Our datasets may not be complete. Automated analysis can produce errors. If you believe any data on this page is incorrect, please contact us at hello@nzxplorer.co.nz. For informational purposes only. Not investment advice.