Westpac 2019 Group Annual Report
Help when
it matters.
2019
Annual Report
Westpac Group’s 2019 Reporting Suite
Westpac’s full 2019 reporting suite includes
the Group’s Annual Report, Full Year Financial
Results, Investor Discussion Pack, Annual
Review and Sustainability Report, Sustainability
Performance Report, Pillar 3 Report and other
shareholder information including a financial
calendar. For details, visit the Investor Centre
at westpac.com.au/investorcentre.
Annual ReportAnnual Review and
Sustainability Report
Sustainability
Performance Report
Help when
it matters.
2019
Annual Report
Help when
it matters.
2019
Annual Review &
Sustainability Report
Help when
it matters.
2019
Sustainability
Performance Report
Our commitment to helping started in 1817
when Westpac first opened its doors, helping
to build a fledgling colony’s diversified
economy and its own currency.
Helping is at the heart of what we do
and is central to our vision to become
one of the world’s great service
companies. Whether it’s helping
customers buy and pay off their homes,
manage their finances or kick start a
business – or by supporting them in
times of change or difficulty – we are
there to help in the moments that matter.
By getting service right, customers
benefit, the community benefits and
shareholders benefit.
Help when
it matters.
Cover image and this page:
Westpac’s 2019 ‘Baker of Beirut’ campaign
Westpac Banking Corporation
ABN 33 007 457 141
Performance highlights 2
Section 1 3
Chairman’s report 4
Chief Executive Officer’s letter 8
Information on Westpac 14
Significant developments 15
Directors’ report 26
Remuneration Report 44
Section 2 75
Five year summary 76
Reading this report 77
Review of Group operations 79
Income statement review 81
Balance sheet review 87
Capital resources 90
Divisional performance 93
Consumer 96
Business 97
Westpac Institutional Bank 98
Westpac New Zealand 99
Group Businesses 101
Risk and risk management 102
Risk factors 102
Risk management 113
Credit risk 114
Funding and liquidity risk 115
Market risk 116
Operational risk 116
Conduct and compliance risk 116
Governance risk 117
Risk culture 117
Strategic risk 117
Capital adequacy 118
Cyber risk 118
Reputation risk 118
Sustainability risk 118
Westpac’s approach to sustainability 121
Sustainability performance 121
Five year non-financial summary 130
Other Westpac business information 132
Section 3 135
Financial statements 136
Notes to the financial statements 142
Statutory statements 279
Section 4 289
Shareholding information 290
Additional information 300
Information for shareholders 304
Glossary of abbreviations and defined terms 307
Contact us inside back cover
In this Annual Report a reference to ‘Westpac’, ‘Group’, ‘Westpac Group’, ‘we’, ‘us’ and ‘our’ is to Westpac Banking Corporation ABN 33 007
457 141 and its subsidiaries unless it clearly means just Westpac Banking Corporation.
For certain information about the basis of preparing the financial information in this Annual Report see ‘Reading this report’ in Section 2. In
addition, this Annual Report contains statements that constitute ‘forward-looking statements’ within the meaning of Section 21E of the US
Securities Exchange Act of 1934. For an explanation of forward-looking statements and the risks, uncertainties and assumptions to which
they are subject, see ‘Reading this report’ in Section 2.
Information contained in or accessible through the websites mentioned in this Annual Report does not form part of this report unless
we specifically state that it is incorporated by reference and forms part of this report. All references in this report to websites are inactive
textual references and are for information only.
1
2019 Westpac Group Annual Report
1
2
3
4
Table of contents
4
Annual Report
Table of contents
Westpac Group’s 2019 Reporting Suite
Westpac’s full 2019 reporting suite includes
the Group’s Annual Report, Full Year Financial
Results, Investor Discussion Pack, Annual
Review and Sustainability Report, Sustainability
Performance Report, Pillar 3 Report and other
shareholder information including a financial
calendar. For details, visit the Investor Centre
at westpac.com.au/investorcentre.
Annual ReportAnnual Review and
Sustainability Report
Sustainability
Performance Report
Help when
it matters.
2019
Annual Report
Help when
it matters.
2019
Annual Review &
Sustainability Report
Help when
it matters.
2019
Sustainability
Performance Report
Our commitment to helping started in 1817
when Westpac first opened its doors, helping
to build a fledgling colony’s diversified
economy and its own currency.
Helping is at the heart of what we do
and is central to our vision to become
one of the world’s great service
companies. Whether it’s helping
customers buy and pay off their homes,
manage their finances or kick start a
business – or by supporting them in
times of change or difficulty – we are
there to help in the moments that matter.
By getting service right, customers
benefit, the community benefits and
shareholders benefit.
Help when
it matters.
Cover image and this page:
Westpac’s 2019 ‘Baker of Beirut’ campaign
Westpac Banking Corporation
ABN 33 007 457 141
22019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Performance highlights
6,346
6,991
5,936
6,751
7,561
8,012
7,445
7,990
8,095
6,784
Net profit after tax
1
($m)
10111213141516171819
Net profit after tax $6,784 million, down 16%
5,879
6,301
6,564
7,063
7,628
7,820
7,822
8,0628,065
6,849
Cash earnings
2
($m)
10111213141516171819
Cash earnings $6,849 million, down 15%
197.8
209.3
214.8
227.8
245.4
248.2
235.5
239.7
236.2
198.2
Cash earnings per ordinary share
2,4
(cents)
10111213141516171819
Cash earnings per ordinary share, down 16%
139
156
166
174
20
182
187188188188
174
Dividends per ordinary share (cents)
10111213141516171819
Special dividends
Dividends $1.74, down 14 cents
16.116.0
15.4
15.9
16.4
15.8
14.0
13.8
13.0
10.8
Cash earnings to average ordinary equity
2,3
(%)
10111213141516171819
Returns 10.8%, down 225bps
% change
201920182019/2018
Reported earnings
Net profit after tax
1
($m)6,784 8,095 (16%)
Earnings per share (cents)196.5 237.5 (17%)
Dividends per share (cents)174 188 (7%)
Return on equity
3
(%)10.7 13.1 (240bps)
Expense to income ratio (%)48.9 43.8 Large
Common Equity Tier 1 capital ratio (%)10.7 10.6 4bps
Cash earnings basis
2
Cash earnings ($m)6,849 8,065 (15%)
Cash earnings per share (cents)198.2 236.2 (16%)
Cash earnings return on equity (%)
3
10.8 13.0 (225bps)
Economic profit
5
($m)1,619 3,444 (53%)
1. Net profit attributable to ordinary equity holders.
2. The adjustments to our reported results to derive cash earnings are described in Note 2 of our 2019 financial statements.
3. Return on average ordinary equity.
4. Periods prior to 2015 have not been restated for the bonus element of the 2015 share entitlement offer.
5. Economic profit represents the excess of adjusted cash earnings over a minimum required rate of return on equity invested. For
this purpose, adjusted cash earnings is defined as cash earnings plus the estimated value of franking credits paid to shareholders.
The calculation of economic profit is described in more detail in Section 5 of Westpac’s Full Year 2019 Results (incorporating the
requirements of Appendix 4E) lodged with the ASX on 4 November 2019 (the’ASX Announcement’).
Performance highlights
3
2019 Westpac Group Annual Report
1
2
3
4
Chairman’s report
Chief Executive Officer’s letter
Information on Westpac
Directors’ report
(including Remuneration Report)
01
This year
has been
a challenging
period
Lindsay Maxsted
Chairman
42019 Westpac Group Annual Report
A challenging year
This year has been a challenging period for the financial
services sector, and for Westpac. At an industry
level, the repercussions from the Royal Commission
into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and
Financial Services Industry (Royal Commission) have
continued, self-assessments into governance, culture
and accountability have been completed, and there has
been an increase in regulatory actions and remediation
costs. The operating environment has also become
more difficult with lower economic growth, historically
low interest rates, and even more competition from
international banks, non-banks and niche players.
Despite the challenges presented by the environment,
our capital remains above the Australian Prudential
Regulation Authority’s (APRA) unquestionably strong
benchmark, our funding and liquidity is sound, and
our customer franchise is healthy with a market share
of around 20% across most of the major segments in
which we operate. At the same time we have been rated
the most sustainable bank in Australia (and rated 9th in
world) by the Dow Jones Sustainability Index.
Noting our overall position, we do however face a
number of challenges. Over the last 12 months we have
faced into these, sought to work through the issues
and commenced a number of programs to further
strengthen our position – particularly in enhancing our
approach to governance and risk management. We will
continue to do so.
Royal Commission
Last year in my letter to you I spoke about the impact
of the Royal Commission and the lessons for Westpac.
These were:
(1) that we were slow to focus on non-financial risks
such as conduct, compliance and reputation;
(2) we did not fully appreciate the underlying risks in
the financial planning business; and
(3) that some remuneration arrangements inadvertently
contributed to poor behaviour.
Having identified many of our shortcomings last year,
our focus this year has been on fixing the issues and
beginning to restore the trust that you and customers
have placed in us. Dealing with these lessons in reverse
order, we have already made a number of changes
in remuneration across the organisation to reduce
potential conflicts and ensure the right incentives are
in place for employees. We’ve also made changes to
executive remuneration – which I discuss further below.
In relation to the second lesson, in March this year,
following a detailed review, we announced our decision
Chairman’s report
Five year summary
1
to exit the financial planning business. As part of this
change we ceased providing personal financial advice
by salaried financial advisers under our own brands
and discontinued the practice of enabling independent
advice groups to operate under our licence.
On non-financial risks, in addition to some of the
findings of the Royal Commission we completed a
detailed analysis through our Culture Governance and
Accountability (CGA) self-assessment. This report was
produced for the Board and APRA and provided a
thorough assessment of our strengths and weaknesses
in risk culture, governance and accountability. The
report was prepared by a dedicated team supported by
Oliver Wyman (a global independent expert in financial
services) and is available on our website.
The CGA self-assessment indicated that “Westpac’s
governance, accountability and culture settings, in their
totality generally support sound management of the
Group’s non-financial risks.” The report also highlighted
that “Westpac’s management of non-financial risks...
remains generally less mature than its management of
financial risks and this factor is likely near, or at the root
cause of many of Westpac’s non-financial risk related
issues.”
In other findings, the report indicated that some of
Westpac’s strengths had side effects that impacted the
Group’s culture. For example, the Group’s strong focus
on financial risk has contributed to an “organisational
imperative for safety” and a tendency to over-analyse
issues. On the face of it this could be a strength for a
large financial institution however, these characteristics
have also meant that we have tended to be slow in
decision-making and weak on execution.
Enhancing Governance
In response to the findings of our CGA self-assessment,
we have commenced a detailed program of work to
fix the issues. This work is also aligned with our Royal
Commission Response plan.
While there is still much to do we have nevertheless
made significant progress:
• Of the 45 recommendations in our CGA self-
assessment, 40% have now been implemented.
• Of the 49 Royal Commission recommendations that
require action by to us, 11 have been implemented
and progress is underway with a further 11. The
remaining 27 recommendations require further
clarity or legislative change before we can fully
progress but we are doing all we can now.
5
2019 Westpac Group Annual Report
1
2
3
4
Chairman’s report
Reading this report
I want to highlight that the Board sees these changes
as a positive and necessary investment in Westpac’s
long term sustainability and we are monitoring progress
closely. However I do not want to underestimate the
task ahead of us. It is complex and it will take some
time before we can claim completion. That said, we are
determined to invest what is necessary to complete our
plans and build an even more sustainable organisation.
Shareholders should also be aware that the increase
in scrutiny may result in further regulatory action and
litigation against your company. We will continue to
investigate these matters fully and impartially and where
we recognise we have done the wrong thing we will
take responsibility; and if customers have been affected
we will put things right. There will at times however be
genuine disagreement with regulators and in those cases
we will continue to engage constructively.
Financial Performance
This year our financial performance was disappointing.
While we have continued to grow the balance sheet,
and customer numbers, the significant costs associated
with remediating customers, improving governance
and responding to regulatory change have contributed
to a reduction in earnings. Brian will deal with financial
performance in more detail in his letter but let me cover
the key points.
Reported net profit in Full Year 2019 was $6,784 million
down from $8,095 million in 2018. Cash earnings (our
preferred measure of performance) for the year ended
30 September 2019 was $6,849 million, 15% lower than
the 2018 financial year.
To put performance in perspective, of the $1,216 million
decline in cash earnings, $849 million was due to higher
costs associated with customer remediation and costs
associated with exiting financial planning, what we
have called ‘notable items’. The remaining decline was
mainly due to lower interest margins, a decline in wealth
management and insurance revenue and increased
regulatory and compliance costs.
On the balance sheet liquidity, funding and credit
quality remain strong. Our key liquidity ratios continue
to remain comfortably above regulatory minimums and
we have maintained a sound funding mix.
Credit quality has continued to be a highlight with
all elements of the portfolio in good shape. The ratio
of stressed assets to total committed exposures has
remained near cyclical lows at 1.20%, while impaired
assets represent just 0.25% of total lending. There has
been some increase in consumer delinquencies over the
last couple of years consistent with the softening in the
economy but this is not unexpected.
Capital
Reflecting our priority for strength, Westpac has
materially strengthened its capital position over many
years with our ordinary equity almost doubling since
2009 while our asset base has increased by closer to
50% - a material reduction in gearing. Our CET1 capital
ratio started the decade below 7% and at September
2019 was 10.67%.
Despite this position, the lower earnings and a variety
of changes in the calculation of the components of the
CET1 capital ratio (CET1 capital and risk weighted assets)
has meant that, absent any action on our behalf, we
would not have had a sufficient buffer above APRA’s
unquestionably strong benchmark of 10.5%. As a result,
the Board has taken the decision to raise capital through
an institutional placement and a share purchase plan to
raise around $2.5 billion.
The raising is expected to lift the Group’s capital ratios
by around 58
1
basis points giving us extra capacity to
support customers, including if the economy weakens,
while increasing the buffer for any additional factors
that may impact capital in the period ahead, including
regulatory actions, litigation or changes in APRA or
RBNZ capital requirements.
Dividends
The Board also took the difficult decision this half to
reduce the final 2019 dividend to 80 cents per share,
fully franked. This is a 15% reduction on both the final
2018 dividend and the interim 2019 dividend of 94 cents
per share. This dividend represents a final dividend pay
out ratio of 79% and a dividend yield of 5.4% (before
franking).
This brings the full year dividend to 174 cents per share,
down from 188 cents per share in 2018.
There were a number of factors that led to the decision
to reduce the dividend and we recognise the impact
on shareholders, but as a Board we must continue to
prioritise strength and make decisions that we believe
are in the best long term interests of the company.
In setting the dividend, the Group seeks to maintain
a payout ratio that is sustainable, which we currently
assess as being around 70-75%. While the final dividend
payout ratio is above this level, if we exclude the notable
items referred to earlier, the payout ratio, on a cash
earnings basis, is 71%.
1. Based on risk weighted assets as at 30 September 2019, a 46
basis point increase reflects the impact of the placement only of
$2 billion, while a 58 basis point increase reflects the impact of
both the placement and the share purchase plan, assuming the
share purchase plan raises $500 million (the basis point impacts
are net of issue costs).
62019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Chairman’s report
It is also worth highlighting that the Bank Levy has
continued to weigh on earnings and on returns to
shareholders. This year, the Bank Levy was equivalent to
around 8 cents per share (4 cents per share each half).
The Bank Levy is based on the size of certain liabilities,
not on earnings. Accordingly while earnings were lower
this year, the Bank Levy was higher.
The final ordinary dividend will be paid on 20 December
2019 with the record date of 13 November 2019.
Remuneration
At our 2018 AGM, we received a significant vote against
the adoption of our 2018 Remuneration Report and,
as a result, incurred a ‘first strike’. In accordance with
Australia’s Corporations Act, if we receive a ‘second
strike’ against our 2019 Remuneration Report, a
separate resolution must be put to shareholders at the
2019 AGM asking if they wish to hold an extraordinary
general meeting, known as a ‘spill meeting’.
The Board and I recognise that our decisions on
executive remuneration in 2018 were not in line
with shareholder expectations. In response, we
have consulted extensively over the year to better
understand shareholder views and act on their
feedback. We met with groups of individuals with
the help of the Australian Shareholders’ Association
and we held a number of meetings with institutional
shareholders and advisory groups. I have also received
significant correspondence from shareholders. I greatly
appreciate the time that shareholders have taken to
share their thoughts directly with me and your Board.
In my letter to shareholders accompanying the interim
dividend earlier this year, I explained that the key
concern of shareholders was that your Board did not
apply sufficient discretion to short-term variable reward
(STVR) outcomes in 2018, given Westpac’s flat financial
performance in 2018 and the significant risk and
reputation matters that arose.
Shareholders also provided feedback on the overall
quantum of executive pay, the use of a fair value
allocation methodology to determine the award value of
long-term variable reward and the lack of variability in
short-term variable reward to executives over time.
In response to this feedback, combined with your
Board’s assessment, we made a number of changes
to executive remuneration outcomes this year. The
remuneration report discusses these in more detail,
however the key features of remuneration in 2019
include:
• The CEO has not received any STVR this year. At the
same time, the CEO has had no increase in his base
pay, and indeed he has not had an increase in his
base pay since he commenced the role in 2015.
• Group Executives received between 0% and 83% of
their STVR.
• The Board used its discretion to apply downward
remuneration adjustments to two Group Executives
and two former Group Executives in response
to material risk and compliance matters that
impacted the Group. These adjustments reduced
2019 STVR outcomes to zero for the two former
Group Executives. Many of these adjustments
related to events from prior periods. In addition, the
Board exercised its discretion to apply downward
adjustments to a portion of deferred STVR for two
former Group Executives.
• No LTVR vested for the CEO and Group Executives
in 2019 as performance hurdles were not met.
These awards typically make up around one third
of each of the CEO’s or a Group Executive’s total
remuneration; and
• Director base fees were reduced by 20% for all
current Non-executive Directors for the 2019
financial year.
Changes have also been made to 2020 remuneration
structures including the removal of a fair value
allocation methodology (and moving to face value)
to determine the number of performance share
rights issued under the LTVR to the CEO and Group
Executives. This change contributes to a reduction in
the total target remuneration of the CEO and Group
Executives by 23% and 12.5%, respectively.
We will continue to assess our approach to
remuneration, taking into account shareholder feedback
and new requirements which are being developed by
APRA.
Further details on Westpac’s 2019 performance,
governance and remuneration outcomes, is available
in our 2019 Annual Report and our Annual Review and
Sustainability Report.
7
2019 Westpac Group Annual Report
1
2
3
4
Chairman’s report
Board renewal
Over recent years, your Board has undergone
significant renewal and I am confident the Board has
the right mix of skills, experience and diversity to
guide our business. This year we welcomed two new
members to the Board: Margie Seale and Steve Harker.
Margie has already proven to be a valuable addition
to your Board with over 25 years of senior executive
experience in both Australia and internationally. With a
background in consumer goods and global publishing,
Margie also has direct experience in how digital can
disrupt traditional businesses, which is of great value to
your Board.
Steve Harker has strengthened the Board’s banking
and financial services skills, with a particular focus on
investment and institutional banking. Prior to joining
the Board, Steve was Vice Chairman of Morgan Stanley
Australia and was Managing Director of Morgan Stanley
Australia for almost 20 years.
The Board’s commitment
In closing, I would like to reiterate a point from last year’s
report that your Board is here to represent shareholders
and we shall unashamedly continue to do so, including
striving to provide you with the best possible returns on
your investment over the long-term.
We recognise that we still have work to do to rebuild the
platform that will improve Westpac’s sustainability and
restore the trust that you, the community and customers
have placed in us – our role will be to ensure that the
plans we have put in place will be followed through.
Finally, while the Board has been disappointed with the
findings of the Royal Commission and the CGA self-
assessment we recognise that Westpac is a truly special
company. Westpac is Australia’s oldest company with a
deep history of not only supporting its customers but
supporting the nation and the communities in which
we operate. A key part of Westpac’s progress is the
incredible people whose hard work and dedication I see
every day. It is these same people that will see Westpac
emerge from this environment as an even stronger,
sustainable company.
Lindsay Maxsted
Chairman
Chief Executive Officer’s letter
The year ahead
will continue to be
challenging
Brian Hartzer
Chief Executive Officer
82019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Chief Executive Officer’s letter
Dear Shareholder,
The 2019 financial year was a watershed year for the
banking industry, and for Westpac. In response to
the issues highlighted by the Royal Commission
1
and
our Culture, Governance, and Accountability (CGA)
self-assessment
2
, various regulatory actions across
the industry, and a rapidly evolving competitive
environment, we have made significant changes to the
way we serve customers, to our business structure, and
in the technology we use to support our people and our
customers.
These changes include the implementation of the new
Banking Code of Practice; new policies and approaches
for supporting vulnerable customers; the decision to
exit our financial planning business; the implementation
of a number of new controls and compliance processes,
particularly in lending; and the roll-out of a major new
technology system—the Customer Service Hub—that
provides the foundation for improving both service
quality and cost over the next several years.
We also booked significant provisions for customer
remediation payments and costs associated with our
former financial planning network and various other
operational issues we identified as part of our ‘get it
right, put it right’ initiative.
Externally, we confronted the impact of significantly
lower interest rates and a substantial fall in demand for
lending. This coincided with increased competition from
both traditional and new competitors, many of whom
are being enabled by advances in digital and mobile
technology.
Due to these and other factors, our financial
performance for the year was disappointing. I am
acutely aware of the faith you place in us to look after
your investment and deliver acceptable returns—
including dividends. And I would like to assure you that,
despite the unusually large number of challenges we
faced this year, your management team is committed
to investing in the changes needed to build a more
sustainable business and deliver superior returns over
time.
As part of this commitment, we made further progress
on our aspiration to be one of the world’s great service
companies. This included improvements in service
quality, digital transformation, productivity, and service
culture. While much work remains, we finish this year
stronger than we started, with a clear plan and a high
quality, motivated workforce who are committed to
improving execution and getting things done.
As in previous years, my goal with this letter is to
explain what happened this year, what we have
achieved, and where we have fallen short. I also want
to address the changing strategic environment that
we face and how we are adapting so we emerge from
this period as the best positioned bank to deliver
sustainable returns into the future.
I’ve organised this letter to respond to the following
questions:
(1) What drove financial performance this year?
(2) Why are we raising capital?
(3) How are we progressing on our key priorities?
(4) How are we improving non-financial risks, culture,
and governance?
(5) How is the market evolving, and what are our
priorities to respond?
(6) What is the outlook for 2020?
1. What drove financial performance this
year?
We consider financial performance across four
dimensions: strength, return, productivity, and growth.
To be sustainable, banks must strike the right balance
across all these dimensions – and we have had
reasonable success on each.
Balance sheet strength will always be our number
one priority. The lessons of the 1991 recession (the
importance of strong credit risk disciplines) and the
2008 Global Financial Crisis (the importance of strong
funding, liquidity, and capital) are alive and well.
Credit quality remained sound over the year, although
as expected we did see a moderate deterioration in
delinquencies on housing loans, with 0.88% of loan
balances more than 90 days past due. This mostly
reflects some increase in stress and a slowdown
in housing turnover in certain parts of the country,
increasing the time it takes for people to clear their
loans when they need to sell. Our institutional bank
impaired assets to total exposure remain very low at
just 0.08%, while in business lending, impaired assets to
total exposure were up just 3 basis points to 0.62% over
the last 6 months. In New Zealand, the picture is similar
with impaired assets to total exposure just 0.08%, with
the ratio almost halving over the year. The quality of our
credit book meant that impairment charges declined
2% to $794 million, representing 11 basis points of gross
loans.
We finished the year with a strong funding and liquidity
position, which provides resilience in the event of
market disruption. We fully funded new lending with
1. Officially, “The Royal Commission into Misconduct in the
Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry”
2. Westpac’s Culture, Governance and Accountability self-
assessment (CGA) was produced for the Westpac Board and
APRA. A copy is available on our website.
9
2019 Westpac Group Annual Report
1
2
3
4
Chief Executive Officer’s letter
customer deposits, and our Net Stable Funding ratio
(which measures the proportion of our funding that
comes from ‘sticky’ deposits and other long-term
funding sources) was 112%—well above the 100%
regulatory minimum. At the end of September, we held
$144 billion in cash and other liquid assets, representing
127% of our short-term liabilities (the Liquidity Coverage
Ratio).
Our Common equity tier 1 capital ratio finished the year
at 10.7%, and above APRA’s ‘unquestionably strong’
benchmark (I will discuss our capital position in more
detail later in this letter).
Turning to returns, our overall financial result for FY19
was disappointing. Reported profit was down 16% to
$6,784 million and cash earnings were $6,849 million in
FY19, down 15% or $1,216 million.
Performance was significantly impacted by notable
items of $1,130 million (after tax) in FY19—$849 million
higher than the previous year and accounting for most
of the decline in cash earnings. These notable items
largely reflect provisions we’ve set aside for customer
remediation and costs associated with exiting our
financial planning business.
Excluding notable items, cash earnings were $367
million lower—down 4% compared to FY18. This decline
was mostly due to a 7 basis-point decline in margins to
2.16% as a consequence of a lower Treasury contribution
and an extremely competitive environment.
Earnings were also impacted by lower revenue in
wealth management, and insurance. In wealth, revenue
was down following the exit of our financial planning
business, the removal of grandfathered commissions,
the migration of MySuper accounts and the decision to
reprice platform margins—each of which hurts revenue
in the short term but supports customers and helps us
build a more sustainable business. The lower Insurance
income was primarily due to higher claims particularly
from the severe weather events (Qld storms and NSW
hailstorms) experienced early in 2019.
Given the challenging environment, productivity was
a major focus this year. We achieved our productivity
goal by delivering $405 million in savings. This reflected
the continued progress on our digital agenda—as
customers shift to self-service and we automate manual
processes—as well as better supplier management and
the implementation of a simpler management structure
across the Group.
Growth this year—particularly balance sheet growth—
was relatively slow, reflecting lower credit demand in
the economy, our risk appetite, and the decision to
prioritise margin. In housing, we also implemented a
number of changes to our loan assessment approach,
and unfortunately, did so in a way that made the
application process harder than it needed to be. Given
industry competition, some customers and brokers
diverted their business elsewhere – and our lending
slowed.
In response, we’re working hard to simplify our
processes, with a number of improvements already
rolled out. As a result, we expect home lending to
contract early in the year but to be growing in line with
the system by the end of the 2020 financial year.
Small business growth has also been affected by more
onerous lending requirements, given the links between
many small business customers’ personal and business
finances. Credit demand was also weaker among larger
customers—including corporates—but this was more
a function of weaker business sentiment and a softer
economic outlook.
The reduction in cash earnings, and an increase in the
strength of our capital base, meant that the return on
equity declined to 10.75%—down over 2 percentage
points over the year. Given the importance of capital
as a driver of return on equity, it is important to
understand why we are raising capital at this point.
2. Why are we raising capital?
Our common equity tier 1 (CET1) capital ratio of
10.7% remains well above the 8% minimum regulatory
requirement and is ahead of APRA’s unquestionably
strong benchmark. We hold around $46 billion in
common equity, up $7 billion over the last three years.
That capital provides the backing to absorb losses in
the event of a downturn and forms part of the funding
pool for our lending. In addition, banks with high capital
backing are generally rewarded with higher credit
ratings, which make it cheaper to borrow in capital
markets, particularly offshore.
The complexity comes in the way regulators assess our
capital position—usually through the ratio of capital
to risk-weighted assets (the CET1 capital ratio). From
time-to-time regulators recalibrate how they measure
risk-weighted assets, and what should be included, or
excluded, from the capital base. This in turn can reduce
the reported capital ratio, despite the actual dollar
amount of capital going up. In addition, earlier in the
year APRA applied a $500 million capital overlay to
Westpac (and other Major banks) until such time as we
complete the actions from our CGA self-assessment.
This overlay translated into a further reduction in our
CET1 capital ratio of 16 basis points.
At the end of September, our CET1 capital ratio would
have been around 75 basis points higher had it not
been for such developments. Looking ahead, we
face continued uncertainty around APRA’s capital
requirements, the potential for further regulatory
actions and costs, and the earnings headwinds of low
1. Based on risk weighted assets as at 30 September 2019, a 46
basis point increase reflects the impact of the placement only of
$2 billion, while a 58 basis point increase reflects the impact of
both the placement and the share purchase plan, assuming the
share purchase plan raises $500 million (the basis point impacts
are net of issue costs).
10
2019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Chief Executive Officer’s letter
interest rates and higher compliance costs. Furthermore,
the Reserve Bank of New Zealand is currently proposing
to significantly increase the capital requirements for
New Zealand Banks (although the amount of the
increase is yet to be finalised).
Given our priority for balance sheet strength, we
concluded that the prudent course of action was to
seek to raise $2.5 billion in capital, which increases
our CET1 capital ratio by around 58
1
basis points. This
capital is expected to increase our buffer above APRA’s
unquestionably strong benchmark of 10.5% and position
us to respond to potential future impacts on capital
(indicated above) and continue to lend and support the
economy in the event of a downturn.
Our decision to reduce the dividend to 80 cents per
share was not easy, as we know that many shareholders
rely on our dividends for income. In addition, we carry
a substantial balance of franking credits that we would
like to distribute to our shareholders. However, with
increased shares on issue and downward pressure on
returns, we felt it was prudent to bring our payout to
a range that allows us to retain sufficient capital to
support future growth.
3. How are we progressing on our
strategic priorities?
In my letter last year, I identified three priorities for the
year ahead:
• Deal with outstanding issues;
• Maintain momentum in our customer franchise; and
• Structural cost reduction.
Deal with outstanding issues
In recent years a number of issues have emerged
relating to past business practices, operational errors,
gaps in compliance, or changes in regulation. These
were identified through the Royal Commission, our CGA
self-assessment, ongoing product reviews, and various
regulatory actions. The faster we resolve these issues,
the sooner we can refocus investment and management
attention on delivering more for customers, thereby
increasing the value of our franchise.
The most significant change over the year was the
exit of our financial planning business and reducing
our operating divisions from five to four. The financial
planning business had been loss-making for some time
and so this change is expected to be EPS positive in
2020. Exiting the business came with an immediate
shut-down cost, but this will be quickly offset by cost
savings and reduced risk. Our remaining Insurance,
Superannuation, Investments, Platforms and Private
Wealth businesses have been integrated into our
Consumer and Business divisions.
Customer remediation was another area of focus. Over
the course of the year we continued to work through
a backlog of historical issues in our financial planning
and banking businesses and we continue to work with
regulators to agree on a fair and reasonable approach
to remediation.
The most significant of these issues is the so-called “fee
for no service” issue in financial planning.
Under the “Future of Financial Advice” (FOFA)
legislation introduced in 2012, financial planning
businesses were required to eliminate ‘conflicted
remuneration’ (commission) payments to planners and
move to a fee-for-service model. As part of this, BT
implemented systems (including new contracts, new
technology, and an annual fee disclosure statement)
seeking to ensure customers received the advice
services they were paying for. However, as with other
financial planning businesses, we identified some
incidences of advice not being provided and cases
where insufficient records were retained to meet
regulator expectations.
We have therefore been working through a process
to review our customer files and repay customers
where appropriate. This issue is more complex in the
case of aligned dealer group planners, who operated
separately, but under our licence. This was a standard
industry practice, where companies like BT provided
licensing and back-office services to planning groups.
In these cases, we face significant logistical challenges
in obtaining and checking all the historical files of those
non-Westpac advisers, particularly if they have left the
industry.
Other remediation matters include instances where
we didn’t meet certain reporting standards, or made
administrative or operational errors in certain products.
We have established a dedicated remediation hub
to streamline the process of refunding customers.
Currently there are around 750 staff dedicated to
remediation activities, and since 2017 we have paid out
$350m in compensation to customers.
Beyond remediation, our response to the findings of
the Royal Commission and our CGA self-assessment
are well underway. We have implemented 11
recommendations as part of our Royal Commission
program with a further 11 currently being implemented.
We have commenced work on most of the remaining 27
recommendations that presently apply to us, but we will
need to wait until the government passes the required
legislation before we can fully progress the bulk of
these. With our CGA action plan, we have implemented
40% of the recommendations and we expect to
implement the remainder by March 2021. Changes we
have made so far include centralising our complaints
management, enhancing consequence management
and remuneration governance, and introducing new
board and committee processes.
Maintaining momentum in our customer franchise
The long-term success of our business depends on the
strength and depth of our customer relationships. In
2019 we continued to improve our service offering and
the technology needed to deliver better service in the
future.
11
2019 Westpac Group Annual Report
1
2
3
4
Chief Executive Officer’s letter
These and other changes have materially improved
system stability with no major system outages in
FY19—a big step up when you consider just a few years
ago we experienced one or two major issues a month.
Further changes and upgrades are planned that will
further improve the experience for customers and
enable more efficient processes for our bankers.
At the same time, competition has intensified, especially
in the mortgage business. As I indicated earlier,
stepping out of line with the market quickly impacts
market share. This happened to us in the latter part of
the FY19, although we expect this to normalise through
the year ahead.
Increasing structural productivity
Using technology to drive down costs is an important
part of our strategy to remain competitive and deliver
good returns over time. This is increasingly important
in a low-rate, slow-growth environment where margins
are under pressure and regulatory and compliance costs
are rising. At the same time, emerging competitors
have no physical networks to support and have a cost
advantage in delivering some products.
This year our $405 million in productivity savings
through a company-wide focus on simplification,
automation, and digitisation was up one-third on
the productivity savings delivered last year. Part of
this reflects the benefits from prior investments in
digitisation and automation, while a continued shift of
customers from physical to digital channels allowed
us to rationalise 61 branches and reduce ATM numbers
by 375.
Physical presence continues to be important for
many customers and we are investing to upgrade our
branch network in high-volume locations. However,
changing customer traffic patterns into regional
centres and the increasing use of contactless cards
and mobile payments mean that we need fewer, well
located branches to meet demand. To further improve
efficiency, we have entered into an agreement to
sell most of our ‘off-site’ ATM network to a third-
party. This agreement materially retains the level of
service Westpac customers currently receive from our
ATM network but will allow us to benefit from scale
efficiencies that this third party can achieve with their
other cash processing.
Other cost initiatives during the year included
renegotiating supplier arrangements, further
automating back-office operations, and simplifying our
organisational structure. In total, these changes resulted
in a net 5% reduction in full-time equivalent headcount
across the company, despite adding significant
extra resources to support the remediation activities
described above.
Increased compliance, regulatory, and remediation costs
along with revenue headwinds mean that productivity
benefits are not yet visible in traditional measures of
bank productivity, such as the cost-to-income ratio.
However I am confident that, as these programs and
the related costs roll off over the next few years,
the improved efficiency and competitiveness of our
underlying business will become apparent.
In recent years we have built a strong service ethos
throughout the company. Employees participate at least
weekly in service ‘huddles’, where we review our service
standards, share stories and examples of good service,
and discuss where we can improve. This reinforces our
customer-first approach and is further supported by
embedding customer satisfaction and related service
metrics in individual scorecards and performance
rewards.
A focus this year was on improving our ability to
identify and support vulnerable customers. This
included setting up a new Customer Vulnerability
Council, making changes to various complaints policies,
and rolling out training to our people on how to identify
customers experiencing vulnerability. We promoted
this through our Westpac “Help when it matters”
advertising, with campaigns around relationship
breakdown, loss of a loved one, and the impact of
natural disasters.
Our continued focus on service has led to a 2% rise in
customers to 11.2 million in Australia. In business, we
held our #1 NPS
1
ranking in each of our key segments
and increased our lead on #2 while in consumer, we
rank #3 on NPS
1
and closed the gap to #1.
In technology, we delivered several new digital
innovations to make things better for customers. These
included our AI chat-bot ‘Red’, which can respond in
real time to customer enquiries, a fully digital mortgage
process for St.George customers, a new Digital
Institutional Bank platform, an online pricing platform
for term deposits, and an extensive rollout of the real
time New Payments Platform which has seen us process
around 40% of the flows on this platform. Around
40% of our digital sales are now completed online – a
material uplift from just a few years ago.
We have also completed major upgrades to our
technology infrastructure that have improved reliability
and will ultimately enable us to deliver even more for
customers. These include:
• Launching our ‘Customer Service Hub’, a modern
platform for originating and servicing mortgages
and other consumer banking products;
• Rolling out a new data platform that supports the
Government’s ‘Open Banking’ regulations and will
allow us to better understand customer needs;
• Completing the rollout of Panorama, our market-
leading investment platform for independent
financial advisors and their clients; and
• Renewing much of our underlying network and
data centre infrastructure. This included moving
over 600 applications to the new environment and
upgrading over 300 applications hosted on legacy
infrastructure.
1. For details on metric definition and provider please refer to the
2019 Full Year Results Presentation & Investor Discussion Pack
available at www.westpac.com.au
2. BEAR: The Bank Executive Accountability Regime, administered
by APRA
122019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Chief Executive Officer’s letter
4. How are we strengthening non-financial
risk, governance, and accountability?
The findings of the Royal Commission and our CGA
self-assessment highlighted a number of areas where
we need to improve non-financial risk management,
governance, and accountability. To address these,
several major programs of work are under way, with
specific actions being tracked and reported at both the
Group Executive level and to the Board.
Specific areas of focus include:
• Improving the identification, escalation, and
resolution of non-financial risk issues across the
Group, with a particular focus on financial crime-
related issues;
• Enhancing our end-to-end lending processes;
• Providing more detailed reporting on operational
and compliance incidents to the Executive team and
Board;
• Improving the efficiency and effectiveness of
committee meetings;
• Clarifying and strengthening resources under
the ‘Three Lines of Defence’ approach to risk
management;
• Clarifying individual accountability for all managers,
in line with the new BEAR
2
regime; and
• Improving awareness and protection for whistle-
blowers.
In addition, we continue to enhance and reinforce
general risk awareness across the Group.
5. How is the market evolving, and what
are our priorities to respond?
In 2015 we recognised that a once-in-a-generation
change in banking was underway, as a consequence
of changing customer behaviour, new technology, new
competitors, and increased community and regulatory
expectations. Over the past year, these trends have
accelerated. In particular, we see:
• An increasing shift to digital self-service among
customers;
• Increased competition, especially in mortgages, from
foreign and regional banks who rely on mortgage
brokers for their sales;
• The rise of digital-only competitors;
• The growth of fintech businesses offering new, data-
driven services;
• Increased compliance costs and capital requirements
across traditional banking businesses; and
• Continued reputational challenges for banks as
a result of issues identified through the Royal
Commission.
While these challenges are significant—particularly in
the short term—we believe the longer-term outlook for
a large bank like Westpac remains positive given:
• The size and strength of our balance sheet
(especially our deposit base and diverse funding
sources);
• The quality and scale of our customer franchise,
including our portfolio of brands and extensive data
assets;
• The financial resources and skills required to build
the technical innovations and partnerships required
in a digital world;
• Our ability to meet ever-rising regulatory
expectations; and
• Our ability to attract and retain top quality talent in
a small market, given our reputation as an employer
of choice.
We recognise that we are a service business: We’ve set
the goal for Westpac to be “one of the world’s great
service companies, helping our customers, communities
and our people to prosper and grow.”
To grow the long-term value of the company, our
strategy is to build scale in customer relationships
through the provision of world-class service; supported
by a strong balance sheet, great people, and a modern,
highly efficient technology platform, as well as a
network of partnerships among new, digitally-savvy
competitors and suppliers.
To bring this strategy to life, we are continuing to deliver
on a multi-year investment program we call the “Service
Revolution”, designed to strengthen our competitive
offers and reshape the capabilities and cost structure of
the company. This program is organised around three
themes:
• Performance disciplines: Prudently managing our
capital, funding, and liquidity; seeking to maintain a
superior ROE to the peer average while remaining
targeted and disciplined on asset growth and credit
quality;
• Service leadership: Continuing to grow the Group’s
customer base while increasing the quality and
depth of those relationships, as measured through
the number of customers who view us as their
main financial institution. We look to achieve this by
delivering world-class service levels (both personal
and digital), as measured by NPS; recognising that
a great service business requires a high quality, well-
trained, diverse, and engaged workforce; and
• Digital transformation: Using technology to
materially improve efficiency and reduce the Group’s
cost-to-income ratio below 40% in the medium-
term. This will include migrating more sales and
service activity to digital, reshaping the Group’s
distribution network, modernising underlying
technology platforms, and building an extensive
network of digital partnerships and data assets.
While we will continue to deliver this program of work
over several years, we have set a number of specific
priorities over the next couple of years. These are:
1. Service leadership:
• Extend our #1 in NPS
1
for business
• Close the gap to the #1 major bank in consumer
2. Digital transformation:
• Complete roll-out of the Customer Service Hub
to all our mortgage bankers and to external
brokers
• Launch a new mobile banking app with improved
usability and functionality
• Launch Open Banking data capabilities
• Drive digital sales to 45% across the Group
1. For details on metric definition and provider please refer to the
2019 Full Year Results Presentation & Investor Discussion Pack
available at www.westpac.com.au
13
2019 Westpac Group Annual Report
1
2
3
4
Chief Executive Officer’s letter
For banks, the environment remains challenging.
Interest rates at these low levels put significant pressure
on margins, as many deposits are essentially at a
‘floor’ beyond which they can’t be repriced down. In
addition, earnings on invested capital and liquidity are
progressively lower as the portfolio rolls-over to much
lower interest rates.
Regulatory actions—flowing from the Royal Commission
and other industry reviews and investigations—
will continue to require significant investment and
management attention. Regulators have substantially
stepped up their resources and enforcement activity,
leading to a dramatic increase in our own costs as we
respond to the various enquiries, make improvements in
our non-financial risk and control environment, and deal
with the consequences—including fines and other legal
fees—related to any adverse findings.
In addition, regulators in Australia and New Zealand
have a number of reviews underway, in many areas
including home loan pricing, remuneration, and capital/
risk weighted asset methodologies across the sector.
Further clarity on these reviews is expected in the year
ahead.
Conclusion
I want to conclude by thanking shareholders, on behalf
of the management team and all of our employees, for
your continued support this year. We recognise that
reputational issues, regulatory and legal issues, and
financial performance challenges have made this a
difficult year to be an investor in Westpac.
The year ahead will continue to be challenging, from
multiple perspectives—economic, competitive, legal,
reputational, and regulatory. I hope that my letter has
provided some useful context as to the nature of these
challenges and the clear-eyed way in which we are
responding to this environment. We recognise where
we have fallen short, and are absolutely committed to
executing better and delivering on our strategy for the
future.
Through everything that has happened this year, I
remain very proud of this company, and its people.
We are well positioned, with many talented, dedicated
bankers who come to work every day genuinely
seeking to deliver world-class service and innovation for
customers.
I believe Westpac’s future is very bright and 2019
will prove to be a watershed for us in confronting
the realities of a changed banking environment
and responding decisively in ways that set us up to
outperform in the future.
Once again, thank you for your continued support and
faith in the Westpac Group.
Brian Hartzer
Chief Executive Officer The Westpac Group
3. Performance discipline:
• Deliver $500 million in annual productivity
savings in FY20 (23% above FY19)
• Further reshape the network
• Improve controls and risk management
capabilities to ensure Westpac is resilient for
the future, including further implementation of
the Royal Commission and CGA self-assessment
recommendation
We will report progress against each of these goals in
our regular market updates.
6. What is the outlook for 2020?
The economic outlook for Australia remains challenging,
in part reflecting a softer global environment.
Annualised growth in the June quarter of 2019 was only
1.4%, which is lower than population growth of 1.6%. The
dynamics of global trade, weak real wages growth, a
softer housing market, low interest rates and subdued
economic activity have all dampened consumer
confidence.
That said, overall GDP growth remains positive and the
economy continues to benefit from a strong resources
sector, a lower Australian dollar, large infrastructure
investments, and targeted income tax cuts. A slowdown
in residential construction over the last year, combined
with lower interest rates, should see a continued
recovery in house prices building on the momentum
we have seen in the September quarter, particularly
in Sydney and Melbourne. However GDP growth is
likely to remain below longer-term averages (which is ~
2.75%) at 2.3% for calendar 2019 and 2.4% for calendar
2020.
With consumer and business confidence relatively
weak, credit growth has been slow. Overall credit
growth for the Australian financial system slowed to
2.7% in the year to September 2019, down from 4.5%
a year ago. That included a decline in housing credit
growth from 5.4% to 3.1%; business from 3.8% to 3.3%
and personal credit contracting by 4.4% after declining
by 1% a year earlier.
We expect credit growth to lift slightly in 2020 to 3%
overall, with housing credit growth increasing to 3.5%.
Business credit growth is also expected to grow by
around 3%, while other personal credit is expected to
contract by around 2%.
Interest rates are expected to remain very low. The RBA
reduced the cash rate from 1.5% to 0.75% over the year,
and we expect a further rate cut to 0.5% in early 2020.
With rates at this level, there are limited options for the
RBA to cut further if the economy turns down; however
the Commonwealth Budget is set to return to surplus in
2019/20 and the Commonwealth government has the
scope for additional stimulus if required.
Economic conditions in New Zealand have also
softened, with sluggish consumer spending and weak
business confidence. We expect a small improvement
in 2020 supported by lower interest rates; some fiscal
stimulus; and the competitive (lower) New Zealand
dollar.
142019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Information on Westpac
Westpac is one of the four major banking organisations
in Australia and one of the largest banking organisations
in New Zealand. We provide a broad range of banking
and financial services in these markets, including
consumer
1
, business and institutional banking and
wealth management services.
We have branches, affiliates and controlled entities
2
throughout Australia, New Zealand, Asia and in the
Pacific region, and maintain branches and offices in
some of the key financial centres around the world.
3
We were founded in 1817 and were the first bank
established in Australia. In 1850, we were incorporated
as the Bank of New South Wales by an Act of the New
South Wales Parliament. In 1982, we changed our name
to Westpac Banking Corporation following our merger
with the Commercial Bank of Australia. On 23 August
2002, we were registered as a public company limited
by shares under the Australian Corporations Act 2001
(Cth) (Corporations Act).
At 30 September 2019, our market capitalisation was
$103 billion
4
and we had total assets of $907 billion.
Organisational structure
Our business is focused in Australia and New Zealand,
operating under multiple brands. The Group operates
through an extensive branch and ATM network,
significant online capability, and call centres supported
by specialist relationship and product managers. Our
operations comprise the following key divisions:
Consumer is responsible for sales and service to
consumer customers in Australia. Consumer is also
responsible for the Group’s insurance business which
covers the manufacture and distribution of life, general
and lenders mortgage insurances. The division also uses
a third party to manufacture certain general insurance
products. Banking products are provided under the
Westpac, St.George, BankSA, Bank of Melbourne, and
RAMS brands, while insurance products are provided
under Westpac and BT brands. Consumer works with
Business and WIB in the sales, service, and referral
of certain financial services and products including
superannuation, platforms, auto lending and foreign
exchange. The revenue from these products is mostly
retained by the product originators.
Business provides business banking and wealth facilities
and products for customers across Australia. Business is
responsible for manufacturing and distributing facilities
to SME and Commercial business customers (including
Agribusiness) generally for up to $150 million in
exposure. SME customers include relationship managed
and non-relationship managed SME customers
(generally between $100k-$250k facilities). The division
offers a wide range of banking products and services
to support their borrowing, payments and transaction
needs. In addition, specialist services are provided
for cash flow finance, trade finance, automotive and
equipment finance and property finance. The division is
also responsible for Private Wealth and the manufacture
and distribution of investments (including margin
lending and equities broking), superannuation and
retirement products as well as wealth administration
platforms. Business operates under the Westpac,
St.George, BankSA, Bank of Melbourne, and BT brands.
Business works with Consumer and WIB in the sale,
referral and service of select financial services and
risk management products (including corporate
superannuation, foreign exchange and interest rate
hedging). The revenue from these products is mostly
retained by the product originators.
Westpac Institutional Bank (WIB) delivers a broad
range of financial products and services to commercial,
corporate, institutional and government customers
operating in, or with connections to Australia and New
Zealand. WIB operates through dedicated industry
relationship and specialist product teams, with expert
knowledge in transactional banking, and financial
and debt capital markets. Customers are supported
throughout Australia and via branches and subsidiaries
located in New Zealand, the US, UK and Asia. WIB is
also responsible for Westpac Pacific providing a full
range of banking services in Fiji and PNG. WIB works
with all the Group’s divisions in the provision of markets
related financial needs including foreign exchange and
fixed interest solutions.
Westpac New Zealand is responsible for sales and
service of banking, wealth and insurance products for
consumer, business and institutional customers in New
Zealand. Westpac conducts its New Zealand banking
business through two banks: Westpac New Zealand
Limited, which is incorporated in New Zealand and
Westpac Banking Corporation (New Zealand Branch),
which is incorporated in Australia. Westpac New
Zealand operates via an extensive network of branches
and ATMs across both the North and South Islands.
Business and institutional customers are also served
through relationship and specialist product teams.
Banking products are provided under the Westpac
brand while insurance and wealth products are provided
under Westpac Life and BT brands, respectively. New
Zealand also maintains its own infrastructure, including
technology, operations and treasury.
Group Businesses include:
• Treasury, which is responsible for the management
of the Group’s balance sheet including wholesale
funding, capital and the management of liquidity.
Treasury also manages the interest rate risk and
foreign exchange risks inherent in the balance sheet,
including managing the mismatch between Group
assets and liabilities. Treasury’s earnings are primarily
sourced from managing the Group’s balance sheet
and interest rate risk, (excluding Westpac New
Zealand) within set risk limits;
• Group Technology, which is responsible for
technology strategy and architecture, infrastructure
and operations, applications development and
business integration in Australia;
• Core Support, which comprises functions performed
centrally, including Australian banking operations,
property services, strategy, finance, risk, compliance,
legal, human resources, and customer and corporate
relations; and
1. A consumer is defined as a person who uses our products and
services. It does not include business entities.
2. Refer to Note 31 to the financial statements for a list of our
material controlled entities as at 30 September 2019.
3. Contact details for our head office, major businesses and
offshore locations can be found on the inside back cover.
4. Based on the closing share price of our ordinary shares on the
ASX as at 30 September 2019.
Information on Westpac
15
2019 Westpac Group Annual Report
1
2
3
4
Information on Westpac
• Following the Group’s decision to restructure its
wealth operations and exit its Advice business
in March 2019, the residual Advice operations
(including associated remediation) and certain
support functions of BTFG Australia have been
transferred to Group Businesses.
Group Technology costs are fully allocated to other
divisions in the Group. Core Support costs are
partially allocated to other divisions, while Group
Head Office costs are retained in Group Businesses.
Group Businesses also includes earnings on capital not
allocated to divisions, certain intra-group transactions
that facilitate the presentation of the performance of
the Group’s divisions, gains/losses from most asset
sales, earnings and costs associated with the Group’s
Fintech investments, and certain other head office items
such as centrally raised provisions.
Significant developments
Westpac significant developments
Customer remediation
Through the Group’s ‘get it right, put it right’ initiative
we have continued to review products, processes
and policies to identify where we may not have got it
right for our customers. Where problems have been
identified, the Group has committed to fix them and
refund customers. These initiatives identified a number
of issues that require ongoing remediation.
The Group has undertaken steps designed to accelerate
the processing of customer refunds and centralise
oversight of certain remediation under the Chief
Operating Officer.
Further information in relation to compliance, reputation
and remediation provisions is included in Note 27 to the
financial statements.
Changes to wealth strategy
During the course of the year, Westpac reset its wealth
strategy and made a number of changes to its wealth
business. This resulted in the realignment of our major
BT Financial Group businesses into the Consumer and
Business divisions from 1 April 2019.
During the financial year ended 30 September 2019,
Westpac also completed the exit of its personal
financial advice business, which included completing a
sale with Viridian Advisory on 1 July 2019 and moving to
a referral model for financial advisers utilising a panel of
adviser firms.
First strike against remuneration report
On 12 December 2018 at Westpac’s Annual General
Meeting of shareholders, Westpac incurred a first strike
against its remuneration report. A strike occurs where a
company’s remuneration report receives a ‘no’ vote of
25% or more. If Westpac receives a second strike at its
2019 Annual General Meeting, a spill resolution will be
put to shareholders. If 50% or more of votes cast are in
favour of that spill resolution, a spill meeting is required
to be held within 90 days. At that spill meeting, certain
directors will be required to stand for re-election.
In response to the first strike and other feedback
received Westpac has made changes to both the
structure of remuneration and outcomes. Further detail
is included in the Remuneration Report included in the
Directors’ Report.
Financial crime
In an environment of ongoing legislative reform,
regulatory change and increased industry focus,
Westpac continues to progress a program of work
to improve its management of financial crime risks
(including Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-
Terrorism Financing (AML/CTF), sanctions, Anti-Bribery
and Corruption, FATCA and Common Reporting
Standards). This work includes a review of our AML/
CTF policies, the completeness of data feeding into
our AML/CTF systems and our AML/CTF processes
and controls. Westpac has been regularly updating
AUSTRAC on progress and continues to implement
a number of improvements to its AML/CTF Program,
governance, policies, systems and controls together
with related remediation work in respect of certain
controls and reporting practices. These efforts relate to
matters such as customer on-boarding, customer and
payment screening; ongoing customer due diligence,
transaction monitoring and regulatory reporting
(including in relation to International Funds Transfer
Instructions (IFTIs), Suspicious Matter Reports and
Threshold Transaction Reports).
As reported in the Group’s 2018 Annual Report, the
Group self-reported to AUSTRAC a failure to report
a large number of IFTIs (as required under Australia’s
AML/CTF Act). Under the Act, the ‘sender’ financial
institution of an IFTI transmitted out of Australia, or the
‘recipient’ financial institution of an IFTI transmitted into
Australia, is required to report the IFTI to AUSTRAC
within 10 business days of the instruction being sent
or received. The majority of the IFTIs which are the
subject of the Group’s engagement with AUSTRAC,
concern batch instructions received by Westpac
through one WIB product between 2009 and 2018 from
a small number of correspondent banks for payments
made predominantly to beneficiaries living in Australia
in Australian dollars, on behalf of clients of those
correspondent banks. The majority of the payments
were low value, recurring and made by foreign
government pension funds and corporates.
AUSTRAC has issued a number of detailed statutory
notices over the last year requiring information relating
to the Group’s processes, procedures and oversight.
These notices relate to a range of matters including
these IFTI reporting failures and associated potential
failings related to record keeping and obligations
to obtain and pass on certain data in funds transfer
instructions, as well as correspondent banking due
diligence, risk assessments and transaction monitoring.
Westpac has not yet received an indication from
AUSTRAC about the nature of any enforcement action
it may take. The Group is continuing to work with
AUSTRAC in relation to these matters.
Any enforcement action against Westpac may include
civil penalty proceedings and result in the payment of a
significant financial penalty, which Westpac is currently
unable to reliably estimate. Previous enforcement action
by AUSTRAC against other institutions has resulted
in a range of outcomes, depending on the nature and
severity of the relevant conduct and its consequences.
Further information about these matters is set out in
Note 27 to the financial statements. Details about the
consequences of failing to comply with financial crime
obligations is set out in ‘Risk Factors’ in section 2.
162019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Information on Westpac
Regulatory and Government focus
Royal Commission into the banking, superannuation
and financial services industries
On 14 December 2017, the Australian Government
established a Royal Commission into potential
misconduct in Australia’s banks and other financial
services entities. The Royal Commission’s Final Report
was released on 4 February 2019 and contained 76
express recommendations. In light of Westpac’s wealth
strategy reset and the Government’s signalled approach
to implementation, 49 of those recommendations
presently apply to Westpac. Of these 49
recommendations, 11 recommendations have now been
implemented, with Westpac either establishing new
practices and procedures to meet the recommendations
or having existing practices consistent with the
recommendation, and a further 11 recommendations are
in the process of being implemented. Some of these
recommendations will require legislative or regulatory
action before implementation can be completed.
The remaining 27 recommendations require legislative
or regulatory action before implementation work can
commence. Westpac is undertaking preparatory work
where possible, including through participation in
Government consultation.
The recommendations are broadly aimed at
protecting consumers against misconduct, providing
adequate redress and addressing asymmetries of
power and information between financial services
entities and their customers. Implementation of the
recommendations is likely to continue to have a
significant impact on banking and financial services
entities and their regulators. Some of the most
significant recommendations include those concerning
the regulation of mortgage brokers, the prohibition
of unsolicited sales of insurance and superannuation
products and removal of grandfathered commissions.
The Government has stated that it will take action on
all of the recommendations contained within the Final
Report. On 19 August 2019, the Government released its
Royal Commission implementation roadmap which sets
out a timeline for consultation and the introduction of
legislation which will implement the recommendations.
The implementation roadmap foreshadows that a large
number of legislative changes will be enacted into law
or introduced before Parliament by mid-2020.
Other impacts arising from the Royal Commission
include a number of claims being brought against
financial institutions in relation to certain matters
considered during the Royal Commission, and the
referral of several cases of misconduct to the financial
regulators by Commissioner Hayne.
APRA self-assessment
On 29 November 2018, Westpac submitted to APRA
its self-assessment on its frameworks and practices in
relation to governance, culture and accountability. A
copy of Westpac’s self-assessment is available on our
website.
On 22 May 2019, APRA released a report analysing
self-assessments carried out by 36 banks, insurers
and superannuation licensees. APRA noted a wide
variation in the quality of the self-assessments, however
consistent findings in the self-assessments included:
• non-financial risk management requires
improvement;
• accountabilities are not always clear, cascaded and
effectively enforced;
• acknowledged weaknesses are well-known and
some have been long-standing; and
• risk culture is not well understood, and therefore
may not be reinforcing the desired behaviours.
Westpac has a program of work underway to
address the recommendations identified in the
self-assessment report which has oversight of the
Westpac Board. Westpac has implemented 40% of the
recommendations identified in the self-assessment and
expects to complete its program of work by March 2021.
Regulatory reviews and inquiries
Provision of credit - reviews by and engagement
with regulators
The provision and availability of credit for residential
mortgage holders, property investors and businesses
has continued to be a key area of Government, regulator
and industry focus throughout the financial year ended
30 September 2019. Regulatory focus on credit from
APRA has primarily been related to serviceability at
an industry level, while ASIC has continued to consult
on proposed changes to its regulatory guide on
responsible lending. Judicial guidance on the extent of
responsible lending obligations was also obtained from
the Federal Court in its judgment in ASIC’s responsible
lending test case against Westpac (with the judgment
currently under appeal). More information on these
proceedings is set out in this section below.
APRA has also been engaging with Westpac on the
adequacy of our credit risk management framework
including our controls, policies and operating systems.
Following feedback from APRA, the Group is making
a number of changes to its systems and controls to
improve its end-to-end approach in relation to its
mortgage and business lending portfolios, as well as
other key processes. This includes enhancing portfolio
management practices, systems upgrades (including
data collection and rationalisation), strengthening
collateral management processes and improving
assurance and oversight over our credit management
frameworks. This program of work also addresses issues
identified by Westpac’s internal assurance and audit
teams.
Westpac will continue its work to improve its end to end
credit processes and expects engagement with APRA in
this regard to continue throughout Full Year 2020.
17
2019 Westpac Group Annual Report
1
2
3
4
Information on Westpac
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission
(ACCC) inquiry into home loan pricing
On 14 October 2019, the ACCC was directed by the
Treasurer of Australia to conduct an inquiry into home
loan pricing since 1 January 2019. The inquiry has been
established to:
• investigate the prices charged for home loans across
the sector;
• consider how banks make pricing decisions,
including their approach to passing on movements
in the official cash rate;
• examine differences in the prices paid by new and
existing customers;
• examine differences between the interest rates
published by suppliers and the interest rates paid by
customers; and
• investigate barriers that may prevent consumers
from switching lenders.
An interim report is due by 30 March 2020 and a final
report is due by 30 September 2020.
ACCC residential mortgage products price inquiry
in relation to the Bank Levy
The ACCC undertook a specific inquiry into the pricing
of residential mortgages by those banks affected by
the Bank Levy (including Westpac), which included
monitoring the extent to which the Bank Levy was
passed on to customers. The final report was published
in December 2018 and made a number of findings
about the pricing or residential mortgages, including
that the banks that were the subject of the inquiry did
not change residential mortgage prices specifically to
recover the costs of the Bank Levy.
AFCA look back review
On 4 February 2019, the Australian Government
announced that, in response to the recommendations
contained in the Royal Commission’s Final Report, it
would expand the remit of the Australian Financial
Complaints Authority (AFCA) for 12 months so that it
can consider customer claims dating back to 1 January
2008 and award compensation where appropriate.
AFCA has expanded its jurisdiction to consider these
legacy complaints for an additional 12 month period to
30 June 2020.
Increased regulatory powers and oversight
Australian Securities and Investments Commission
(ASIC) Enforcement Review Taskforce
On 16 April 2018, the Australian Government agreed to
implement all of the recommendations made by the
ASIC Enforcement Review Taskforce in its review of the
suitability of ASIC’s existing regulatory tools.
Progress continues to be made in implementing these
recommendations, including:
• the Australian Treasury releasing five draft Bills on 11
September 2019 for consultation which, if enacted,
would further strengthen ASIC’s enforcement
and supervision powers by implementing certain
recommendations relating to search warrants,
access to telecommunications interception
information, licensing and banning orders; and
• the Taskforce releasing a report on 2 October 2019.
The report sets out ASIC’s observations on director
and officer oversight of non-financial risk, how
directors and officers of large and complex financial
services companies are discharging their duties in
relation to oversight and monitoring of non-financial
risk, and ways that governance practices could be
improved.
Enhanced penalties for corporate and financial
sector misconduct
On 12 March 2019, the Treasury Laws Amendment
(Strengthening Corporate and Financial Sector
Penalties) Act 2019 (Cth) received royal assent. The Act
strengthens penalties for corporate and financial sector
misconduct consistent with the ASIC Enforcement
Review Taskforce recommendations.
Key aspects of the Act are to:
• update the penalties for certain criminal offences
in legislation administered by ASIC, including
tripling the maximum imprisonment penalties
for certain criminal offences (from 5 to 15 years),
introducing a formula to calculate financial penalties
for contraventions of civil penalty provisions
by individuals and companies, and removing
imprisonment as a penalty but increasing the
financial penalties for all strict and absolute liability
offences;
• introduce ordinary criminal offences that sit
alongside strict and absolute liability offences;
• expand the civil penalty regime by making a wider
range of offences subject to civil penalties, such as
failures by Australian financial services licensees
to act efficiently, fairly and honestly, and failures
to report significant breaches within 10 days of
becoming aware of the breach or of circumstances
where they are likely to breach;
• introduce a new test that applies to all dishonesty
offences under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth); and
• ensure the Courts prioritise compensating victims
over ordering the payment of financial penalties.
ASIC’s close and continuous monitoring program
ASIC has continued to use a supervisory approach in
which ASIC officers are embedded in major financial
institutions, including Westpac, in order to actively
limit future financial harm to consumers, investors and
markets and to catalyse positive, consumer oriented,
behavioural change.
To date, the model adopted by ASIC is for officers
to make extended onsite visits to major financial
institutions. ASIC’s program is examining culture and
processes in major financial institutions through three
streams: Breach Reporting, Corporate Governance
and Internal Dispute Resolution (IDR). ASIC’s onsite
on Breach Reporting and engagement on Corporate
Governance is now complete. The IDR onsite for
Westpac commenced on 15 October 2019.
182019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Information on Westpac
care with vulnerable customers and train staff to help,
simplified loan contracts for small business written
in plain English, better protection for guarantors and
stronger enforcement of the Code.
The Code will be further updated with key amendments
in response to the recommendations contained in the
Royal Commission’s Final Report, which recommended
changes in relation to the protection of small businesses
and having a greater focus on customers in remote
areas and those with limited English. These changes
include banning informal overdrafts on basic accounts
without prior express agreement with the customer,
abolishing dishonour fees on basic bank accounts and
following AUSTRAC’s guidance on the identification
and verification of persons of Aboriginal or Torres Strait
Islander heritage. Subject to regulatory approvals, it
is expected that these updates will be effective from
1 March 2020.
Open banking regime
The Treasury Laws Amendment (Consumer Data Right)
Act 2019 (Cth) (CDR Act) received royal assent on 12
August 2019. The CDR Act amends the Competition and
Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth)
and the Australian Information Commissioner Act 2010
(Cth) to introduce a consumer data right. The banking
sector is the first sector to which the consumer data
right will apply.
The introduction of a consumer data right in the
Australian economy signifies a shift in how data is
regulated. It will give customers in Australia a right
to direct that their data (starting with banking data)
be shared with accredited third parties and follows
a growing global trend to give consumers control
over their data. Data sharing is expected to facilitate
competition through easier product comparison and
switching. This will have significant implications for
consumers and banks.
On 2 September 2019, the ACCC released the final
Competition and Consumer (Consumer Data Right)
Rules 2019 (CDR Rules). The CDR Rules outline how
the consumer data right is to be implemented in the
banking sector. A revised timetable for the introduction
of open banking was included as part of the CDR Rules.
Both the CDR Act and CDR Rules contain new, detailed
privacy protections under 13 Privacy Safeguards. The
Privacy Safeguards deal with the disclosure, collection,
use, accuracy, storage, security and deletion of
consumer data right data. There are also 58 civil penalty
provisions under the CDR Rules. A breach of the
Privacy Safeguards or the CDR Rules could attract civil
penalties of up to the greater of $10 million, 3 times any
benefit obtained or 10% of 12 month annual turnover for
corporations.
Comprehensive Credit Reporting (CCR)
On 15 August 2019, an updated version of the National
Consumer Credit Protection Amendment (Mandatory
Comprehensive Credit Reporting) Bill 2018 (Cth) was
released for consultation by the Australian Treasury,
following the prior introduction of the Bill into the
House of Representatives in March 2018. It is expected
that this updated Bill will be introduced into Parliament
in late 2019.
Product design and distribution obligations and
product intervention power
On 5 April 2019, the Treasury Laws Amendment (Design
and Distribution Obligations and Product Intervention
Powers) Act 2019 (Cth) received royal assent. The
Act amends the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) and the
National Consumer Credit Protection Act 2009 (Cth)
and grants ASIC a product intervention power and
introduces a new ‘principles-based’ product design and
distribution obligation on issuers and distributors.
Regulatory enforcement approach
On 15 April 2019, APRA released its Enforcement
Approach with immediate effect. The new Enforcement
Approach follows the results of its Enforcement Review,
released on the same day. The Enforcement Review
made seven recommendations which were designed to
help APRA better leverage its enforcement powers to
achieve prudential outcomes.
In response to the Enforcement Review, APRA stated
it would implement all recommendations including
increasing APRA’s enforcement appetite from a ‘last
resort’ to a ‘constructively tough’ approach. The new
enforcement approach sets out how APRA will use its
enforcement powers to prevent and address serious
prudential risks, and to hold entities and individuals to
account. APRA’s approach states that it may do this
well before the risks (whether financial, operational or
behavioural) present an immediate threat to financial
viability. Further, where entities or individuals are failing
to meet prudential obligations, APRA will act quickly
and forcefully, and will be willing to set public examples
to deter unacceptable practices from occurring in the
future.
On 26 February 2019, the ACCC outlined its compliance
and enforcement priorities in its annual Compliance and
Enforcement Policy refresh. The ACCC’s competition
enforcement approach and objectives are supported
by increased budget support from the Government
announced at the end of 2018.
In October 2018, ASIC committed to accelerating
enforcement activities, conducting more civil and
criminal enforcement actions against large financial
institutions and adopting a ‘why not litigate?’
enforcement stance. Following the release of the Royal
Commission’s Final Report, ASIC has established a
separate Office of Enforcement within ASIC.
Review into corporate criminal responsibility
regime
On 10 April 2019, the Australian Government
commissioned the Australian Law Reform Commission
(ALRC) to undertake a comprehensive review of the
corporate criminal responsibility regime. The review
is to consider reforms to the Criminal Code and other
relevant legislation to provide a simpler, stronger
and more cohesive regime for corporate criminal
responsibility. The ALRC’s report is to be provided to
the Australian Government by 30 April 2020.
General regulatory changes affecting our business
Banking Code of Practice
On 31 July 2018, ASIC approved the Banking Code of
Practice (the Code) with an implementation date of
1 July 2019 for each bank that has adopted the Code
(including Westpac). The Code introduces a range of
new measures including a commitment to take extra
19
2019 Westpac Group Annual Report
1
2
3
4
Information on Westpac
Litigation
ASIC’s responsible lending litigation against
Westpac
On 1 March 2017, ASIC commenced Federal Court
proceedings against Westpac in relation to certain
home loans entered into between December 2011 and
March 2015, which were automatically approved by
Westpac’s systems as part of its broader processes.
The proceedings were heard in May 2019. On 13
August 2019, the Court handed down its judgment
in the proceedings, and dismissed ASIC’s case. On 10
September 2019 ASIC filed an appeal in relation to the
decision.
Outbound scaled advice division proceedings
On 22 December 2016, ASIC commenced Federal Court
proceedings against BT Funds Management Limited
(BTFM) and Westpac Securities Administration Limited
(WSAL) in relation to a number of superannuation
account consolidation campaigns conducted between
2013 and 2016. ASIC has alleged that in the course of
some of these campaigns, customers were provided
with personal advice in contravention of a number of
Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) provisions, and selected
15 specific customers as the focus of their claim. In
December 2018 the primary Court handed down a
judgment in which it held that no personal advice
had been provided and that BTFM and WSAL did not
contravene the relevant personal advice provisions
although it did make a finding that BTFM and WSAL
had each contravened section 912A(1)(a) of the
Corporations Act. In February 2019, ASIC filed an appeal
against this decision. On 28 October 2019, the Full
Federal Court handed down its decision in ASIC’s favour
and made findings that BTFM and WSAL each provided
personal advice on the relevant calls. Once formal
declarations of contravention are made, the matter will
be remitted for penalty.
ASIC’s proceedings against Westpac for poor
financial advice by a financial planner
On 14 June 2018, ASIC commenced proceedings in the
Federal Court against Westpac in relation to alleged
poor financial advice provided by a former financial
planner, Mr Sudhir Sinha. Mr Sinha was dismissed by
Westpac in November 2014 and subsequently banned
by ASIC. Westpac has proactively initiated remediation
to identify and compensate affected customers and has
completed remediation activities. ASIC’s proceedings
relate to advice provided by Mr Sinha in respect of four
specific customer files. The matter was heard by the
Court on 15 April 2019 and judgment has been reserved.
Class action against Westpac Banking Corporation
and Westpac Life Insurance Services Limited
On 12 October 2017, a class action was filed in the
Federal Court of Australia on behalf of customers
who, since February 2011, obtained insurance issued
by Westpac Life Insurance Services Limited (WLIS) on
the recommendation of financial advisers employed
within the Westpac Group. The plaintiffs have alleged
that aspects of the financial advice provided by those
advisers breached fiduciary and statutory duties
owed to the advisers’ clients, including the duty to
act in the best interests of the client, and that WLIS
was knowingly involved in those alleged breaches.
Westpac and WLIS are defending the proceedings.
These proceedings are currently stayed by order of the
Court, pending the outcome of an appeal concerning
a procedural issue unrelated to the substantive claims
made in the class action.
BBSW proceedings
Following ASIC’s investigations into the interbank
short-term money market and its impact on the setting
of the bank bill swap reference rate (BBSW), on 5
April 2016, ASIC commenced civil proceedings against
Westpac in the Federal Court of Australia, alleging
certain misconduct, including market manipulation
and unconscionable conduct. On 24 May 2018, Justice
Beach found that Westpac had not engaged in market
manipulation or misleading or deceptive conduct under
the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth). His Honour also found
that there was no ‘trading practice’ of manipulating the
BBSW rate. However, the Court found that Westpac
engaged in unconscionable conduct on 4 occasions
and that Westpac breached certain of its duties as a
financial services licensee. On 9 November 2018, the
Court ordered Westpac to pay a penalty of $3.3 million
and 50% of ASIC’s costs, and have an independent
expert review particular aspects of Westpac’s
compliance arrangements. Westpac has complied with
these orders. The amount of costs recoverable by ASIC
is still in the process of being determined.
In August 2016, a class action was filed in the United
States District Court for the Southern District of New
York against Westpac and large number of Australian
and international banks alleging misconduct in relation
to the bank bill swap reference rate. In April 2019, an
amended claim was filed by the Plaintiffs. Westpac is
defending the proceedings with a Motion to Dismiss
filed in May 2019.
Responsible lending class action
On 21 February 2019, a class action against Westpac
was filed in the Federal Court of Australia. As directed
by the Court, the Plaintiffs filed a Statement of Claim
on 22 May 2019 and an amended statement of claim
on 18 October 2019. The claims allege that Westpac
did not comply with its responsible lending obligations
and entered into certain home loans that it should
otherwise have assessed as unsuitable. The allegations
include that, during the period from 1 January 2011
to 17 February 2018, Westpac failed to: conduct
reasonable inquiries about the customers’ financial
situation, requirements and objectives; verify customer’s
financial situation; conduct assessments of suitability;
and act efficiently and fairly. Westpac is defending the
proceedings.
Cash in super class action
On 5 September 2019, a class action against BT Funds
Management Limited (BTFM) and Westpac Life
Insurance Services Limited (WLIS) was commenced
in relation to aspects of BTFM’s BT Super for Life cash
investment option. The claim follows other industry
class actions as part of Slater and Gordon’s ‘Get your
super back’ campaign.
It is alleged in the proceedings that BTFM failed to
adhere to a number of obligations under the general
law, the relevant trust deed and the Superannuation
Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (Cth), and that WLIS
was knowingly concerned with BTFM’s alleged
contraventions. The damages sought by the claim
are unspecified. BTFM and WLIS are defending the
proceedings.
202019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Information on Westpac
Information on Westpac
Regulatory capital transactions
Capital raising
On 4 November 2019, Westpac announced that it will
be undertaking an underwritten placement of fully paid
ordinary shares in Westpac to institutional investors
to raise $2 billion. As further announced, following the
placement, Westpac will make a share purchase plan
available to shareholders to raise approximately $500
million, subject to scaleback, and with the ability to raise
less or more.
Issue of Westpac Capital Notes 6
On 18 December 2018, Westpac issued approximately
$1.42 billion of securities known as Westpac Capital
Notes 6 which qualify as Additional Tier 1 capital under
APRA’s capital adequacy framework.
Transfer and redemption of Westpac Capital Notes
On 18 December 2018, approximately $722 million
of Westpac Capital Notes were transferred to the
Westpac Capital Notes nominated party for $100 each
pursuant to the Westpac Capital Notes 6 reinvestment
offer. Those Westpac Capital Notes were subsequently
redeemed by Westpac.
On 8 March 2019, being the optional redemption/
transfer date of the Westpac Capital Notes, the
remaining $662 million of Westpac Capital Notes were
transferred to the Westpac Capital Notes nominated
party for $100 each. Those Westpac Capital Notes were
subsequently redeemed by Westpac.
Adoption of new accounting standards
Adoption of AASB 9 and AASB 15
The Group adopted the classification and measurement,
and impairment requirements of AASB 9: Financial
Instruments (AASB 9) on 1 October 2018. AASB
9 includes a forward looking ‘expected credit
loss’ impairment model, revised classification and
measurement model and modifies the approach to
hedge accounting.
The adoption of AASB 9 reduced the Group’s retained
earnings at 1 October 2018 by $722 million (net of tax)
primarily due to the increase in impairment provisions
under the new standard.
The Group also adopted AASB 15: Revenue from
Contracts with Customers (AASB 15) on 1 October 2018.
AASB 15 provides a systematic approach to revenue
recognition by introducing a five-step model governing
revenue measurement and recognition. The adoption
of AASB 15 reduced the Group’s retained earnings at
1 October 2018 by $5 million (net of tax).
Further details of the changes from the adoption of
AASB 9 and AASB 15 as well as details of accounting
standards that have been issued but are not yet
effective for the Group are included in Note 1 to the
financial statements.
Transition to AASB 16
AASB 16: Leases (AASB 16) replaced AASB 117: Leases
from 1 October 2019. AASB 16 requires all leases of
greater than 12 months duration to be presented on
balance sheet by the lessee as a right-of-use asset and
a lease liability. The application of AASB 16 is expected
to result in the recognition of a right-of-use asset of
$3.4 billion with a corresponding lease liability, with no
impact on retained earnings.
Further details of the changes under the new standard
are included in Note 1 to the financial statements.
APRA regulatory changes
APRA’s proposed changes to capital standards
On 19 July 2017, APRA released an Information Paper
titled ‘Strengthening Banking System Resilience -
Establishing Unquestionably Strong Capital Ratios’.
In its release, APRA concluded that the four major
Australian banks, including Westpac, need to have
a common equity tier 1 (CET1) capital ratio of at
least 10.5%, as measured under the existing capital
framework, to be considered ‘unquestionably strong’.
Banks are expected to meet this new benchmark by 1
January 2020.
APRA has commenced consultation on revisions to
the capital framework which includes proposals on
changes to risk weighted assets, including in relation
to residential mortgages as well as improving the
transparency, comparability and flexibility of the
framework.
As part of the proposals, APRA has proposed a
minimum Leverage Ratio requirement of 3.5% for ADIs,
such as Westpac, that use the internal ratings-based
approach to determine capital adequacy.
APRA has indicated that it expects to finalise the
suite of prudential standards to give effect to the
‘unquestionably strong’ benchmark in 2020-21, with
the revised prudential standards likely to come into
effect from 1 January 2022. In regards to the proposed
revisions to the capital treatment of operational risk,
APRA has proposed an earlier implementation date
of 1 January 2021 for advanced IRB banks, such as
Westpac.
APRA has announced that its revisions to the capital
framework are not intended to necessitate further
capital increases for the industry above the 10.5%
benchmark. However, given the proposals include higher
risk weights for certain mortgage products, such as
interest only loans and loans for investment purposes,
the impact on individual banks may vary. The proposals
are currently under consultation and final details remain
unclear, and it is therefore too soon to determine the
impact on Westpac.
Further details of Westpac’s other regulatory
disclosures required in accordance with prudential
standard APS 330 can be accessed at
https://www.westpac.com.au/about-westpac/investor-
centre/financial-information/regulatory-disclosures/.
APRA’s additional capital requirements
On 11 July 2019, Westpac received APRA’s response
to its self-assessment. In its response, APRA decided
to apply an additional $500 million to Westpac’s
operational risk capital requirement. This follows APRA
concluding that Westpac was required to improve its
management and oversight of non-financial risk. The
additional capital requirement will remain in place until
APRA is satisfied that Westpac has completed its action
plan.
The $500 million requirement, applied through an
increase in risk weighted assets, took effect from 30
September 2019. The change reduced Westpac’s Level
2 CET1 capital ratio by 16 basis points. Westpac’s CET1
capital ratio at 30 September 2019 was 10.67%.
21
2019 Westpac Group Annual Report
1
2
3
4
Information on Westpac
APRA’s proposed revisions to subsidiary capital
investment treatment
On 15 October 2019, APRA released a discussion paper
on proposed changes to APS 111 Capital Adequacy:
Measurement of Capital. The key proposal is in relation
to a parent ADI’s treatment of its equity investments in
banking and insurance subsidiaries (Level 1). Westpac’s
largest investment in banking and insurance subsidiaries
is Westpac New Zealand Limited (WNZL). There is no
impact from this proposal on the calculation of the
Group’s reported regulatory capital ratios on a Level 2
basis. On a Level 1 basis, on a proforma basis as at 30
September 2019, it is estimated that applying APRA’s
proposed approach would reduce Westpac’s Level 1
CET1 ratio by approximately 40bps ($1.6 billion). APRA
has indicated that the updated standard will come into
effect from 1 January 2021.
Associations with Related Entities
On 20 August 2019, APRA released the finalised
prudential standard APS 222: Associations with Related
Entities. The revised standard is intended to strengthen
the ability of ADIs to monitor, limit and control risks
arising from transactions and other associations with
related entities. Key changes include revisions to the
limit for exposure to ADIs from 50% of Total Capital to
25% of Tier 1 capital. The revised standard is effective
from 1 January 2021.
Westpac’s largest exposure to a related entity is WNZL.
As at 30 September 2019, Westpac would remain within
the revised limits based on the current level of exposure
to WNZL.
Additional loss absorbing capacity
In response to the Financial System Inquiry
recommendations, the Australian Government agreed
to further reforms regarding crisis management and
establishing a framework for minimum loss-absorbing
and recapitalisation capacity.
On 9 July 2019, APRA announced a requirement for the
Australian major banks (including Westpac) to increase
their total capital requirements by three percentage
points of risk weighted assets (RWA) as measured
under the current capital adequacy framework. This
increase in total capital will take full effect from 1
January 2024.
Based on Westpac’s RWA of $429 billion at 30
September 2019, this represents around $13 billion
of additional capital over the four year transition
period. The additional capital is expected to be raised
through Tier 2 Capital and is likely to be offset by
a decrease in other forms of long term wholesale
funding. Westpac has commenced progress towards
the new requirements and in the financial year ended
30 September 2019 issued a total of $4.2 billion in Tier
2 capital.
APRA is still targeting an additional four to five
percentage points of loss-absorbing capacity. Over the
next four years, APRA will consider feasible alternative
methods for raising the remaining 1-2 percentage
points.
APRA intends to consult on a prudential framework
covering both recovery and resolution planning in 2020.
APRA’s proposed amendment to guidance on
mortgage lending
On 5 July 2019, APRA announced that it no longer
required ADIs to assess home loan applications using a
minimum interest rate of at least 7%. Instead, ADIs are
permitted to review and set their own minimum interest
rate floor for use in serviceability assessments and
utilise a revised interest rate buffer of at least 2.5% over
the loan’s interest rate. Also on 5 July 2019, APRA also
released its final version of Prudential Practice Guide
APG 223 – Residential Mortgage Lending.
APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234: Information
Security Management
On 1 July 2019, APRA’s Prudential Standard CPS 234:
Information Security came into effect, except for
information assets managed by a third party which will
come into effect from the earlier of the next contract
renewal date or 1 July 2020. The standard is aimed at
improving the ability of APRA-regulated entities to
detect cyber adversaries, ensure appropriate security
capabilities are in place commensurate to the risk of
the information assets including responding swiftly
and effectively in the event of an information security
incident. Westpac continues to enhance its systems and
processes to further mitigate cybersecurity risks.
APRA Prudential Standard CPS 511: Remuneration
On 23 July 2019, APRA released for consultation a new
draft prudential standard and supporting discussion
paper on remuneration. It is aimed at clarifying and
strengthening remuneration arrangements in APRA-
regulated entities. The new standard will replace
existing remuneration requirements under CPS/SPS 510
Governance with a proposed implementation date of
1 July 2021.
International developments affecting Westpac
Brexit
There continues to be uncertainty on the timing and
process for the United Kingdom’s (UK) withdrawal from
the European Union (EU).
As Westpac’s business and operations are based
predominantly in Australia and New Zealand, Westpac
expects that the direct impact of the UK’s departure
from the EU is unlikely to be material to Westpac.
However, it remains difficult to predict the impact
that Brexit may have on financial markets, the global
economy and the global financial services industry.
Westpac has contingency planning in place and has
been active in dialogue with affected customers.
OTC derivatives reform
International regulatory reforms relating to over-the-
counter (OTC) derivatives continue to be implemented
across the globe, with a current focus on initial margin
and risk mitigation practices for non-centrally cleared
derivatives.
As of 1 September 2019, Westpac is required to post
and collect collateral on a gross basis, held at third
party custodians. Global initial margin requirements will
continue to be introduced in phases until 1 September
2021.
222019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Information on Westpac
New Zealand
Reserve Bank of New Zealand (RBNZ) - Revised
Outsourcing Policy
As at 30 September 2019, WNZL is compliant with
the requirement in the RBNZ’s revised Outsourcing
Policy (BS11) (Revised Outsourcing Policy) to maintain
a compendium of outsourcing arrangements and work
is underway to comply with the other aspects of the
Revised Outsourcing Policy by 30 September 2022 in
line with the regulatory timeline.
As a result of complying with the Revised Outsourcing
Policy, the ongoing cost of operating the WNZL
business will increase, in addition to the costs of
implementing the changes.
RBNZ Capital Review
On 14 December 2018, the RBNZ released a consultation
paper to seek the public’s view on a proposal to set a
Tier 1 capital requirement equal to 16% of risk weighted
assets for banks deemed systemically important,
such as WNZL. The proposal of a Tier 1 ratio of 6%
of risk weighted assets as a regulatory minimum is
unchanged, and of this no more than 1.5% of risk
weighted assets can be contributed by Additional Tier
1 capital or redeemable preference shares. The RBNZ
has also proposed changes to risk weighted asset
measurements. The RBNZ has proposed a five year
transition period.
The proposed changes aim to further strengthen the
New Zealand banking system to protect the economy
and depositors from bank failure. WNZL would be
required to hold a further estimated NZ$2.3 – 2.9 billion
of Tier 1 capital (assuming a WNZL Tier 1 capital ratio of
16-17%) if the proposals were applied at 30 September
2019. WNZL is already strongly capitalised with a Tier 1
capital ratio of 13.9% at 30 September 2019.
On a pro-forma basis this change would also increase
Westpac’s Level 1 capital requirements by NZ$1.2-
$1.8 billion if the proposals were applied at 30
September 2019, assuming that some of WNZL’s
supplementary capital can be issued externally over
time and that APRA’s proposed revisions to subsidiary
capital investment treatment are implemented (more
information on these proposed revisions is set out
above). Further clarity on the proposals is expected
from the RBNZ in December 2019 with implementation
of any new rules starting from April 2020.
RBNZ - Review under section 95 of the Reserve
Bank of New Zealand Act 1989
In June 2019, in response to a review under section
95 of the Reserve Bank of New Zealand Act 1989 of
WNZL’s compliance with advanced internal rating based
aspects of the RBNZ’s ‘Capital Adequacy Framework
(Internal Models Based Approach)’ (BS2B), WNZL
presented the RBNZ with a submission providing an
overview of its credit risk rating system and activities
undertaken to address compliance issues and enhance
risk management practices.
On 30 October 2019, the RBNZ informed WNZL that it
had accepted the submission and measures undertaken
by WNZL to achieve satisfactory compliance with BS2B,
and that WNZL would retain its accreditation to use
internal models for credit risk in the calculation of its
regulatory capital requirements. It also advised WNZL
that, with effect from 31 December 2019, the RBNZ will
remove the requirement imposed on WNZL since 31
December 2017 to maintain minimum regulatory capital
ratios which are two percentage points higher than the
ratios applying to other locally incorporated banks.
Review of the Reserve Bank of New Zealand Act
In November 2017, the New Zealand Government
announced it would undertake a review of the Reserve
Bank of New Zealand Act 1989 (RBNZ Review). The
RBNZ Review will consist of two phases. The legislation
for the recommended Phase 1 related changes to New
Zealand’s monetary policy framework received royal
assent on 20 December 2018, and came into force on 1
April 2019.
The terms of reference for Phase 2 were released
in June 2018 and will consider the overarching
objectives of the RBNZ’s institutional governance and
decision-making, the macro-prudential framework, the
current prudential supervision model, trans-Tasman
coordination, supervision and enforcement and
resolution and crisis management. Final policy decisions
on all components of the review are expected to be
made in 2020.
RBNZ/Financial Markets Authority (FMA) -
Financial Services Conduct & Culture Review
In May 2018, the RBNZ and FMA commenced a review
in respect of New Zealand’s 10 major banks and 15
life insurers, including WNZL and Westpac Life-NZ-
Limited, to explain why conduct issues highlighted by
the Australian Royal Commission are not present in
New Zealand. An industry thematic review report for
the banks was released on 5 November 2018. WNZL
submitted a plan responding to recommendations in the
review report and in WNZL’s individual feedback letters
to the regulators on 29 March 2019.
The industry thematic review report into life insurers,
including Westpac Life-NZ-Limited, was released on
29 January 2019. The report identified extensive
weaknesses in life insurers’ systems and controls,
governance and management of conduct risks. Westpac
Life-NZ-Limited provided its plan to address the
findings to the regulators in June 2019.
Conduct of Financial Institutions Review
Following the developments and findings of the
Financial Services Conduct and Culture Review
and the Australian Royal Commission, the Minister
of Commerce announced a proposal to introduce
a conduct licensing regime for banks, insurers and
non-bank deposit takers in respect of their conduct
in relation to retail customers. The regime will require
licensed institutions to meet a fair treatment standard,
and implement effective policies, processes, systems
and controls to meet this standard. The regime will also
create obligations relating to remuneration and sales
incentives. Legislation is expected to be introduced to
parliament by the end of 2019.
Reform of Credit Contracts and Consumer Finance
Legislation
In April 2019, the Credit Contracts Legislation
Amendment Bill was introduced to parliament and
is currently before the select committee. The Bill
introduces a number of changes to the Credit Contracts
and Consumer Finance Act, including new duties for
directors and senior managers and increased penalties
and statutory damages. The Bill also introduces stricter
requirements around suitability and affordability
assessments as well as a cap for interest and fees of
‘high cost’ loans (being loans with annualised interest
exceeding 50%). The intention is that the Bill will come
into effect in March 2020.
23
2019 Westpac Group Annual Report
1
2
3
4
Information on Westpac
Supervision and regulation
Australia
Within Australia, we are subject to supervision and
regulation by six principal agencies and bodies: the
Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA);
the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA); the Australian
Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC); the
Australian Securities Exchange (ASX); the Australian
Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC); and
the Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis Centre
(AUSTRAC).
APRA is the prudential regulator of the Australian
financial services industry. It oversees banks, credit
unions, building societies, general insurance, re-
insurance, life insurance and private health insurance
companies, friendly societies and most of the
superannuation (pension) industry. APRA’s role includes
establishing and enforcing prudential standards
and practices designed to ensure that, under all
reasonable circumstances, financial promises made by
the institutions it supervises are met within a stable,
efficient and competitive financial system. APRA has
recently received new and strengthened powers under
the Banking Executive Accountability Regime.
As an ADI, we report prudential information to APRA,
including information in relation to capital adequacy,
large exposures, credit quality and liquidity. Our
controlled entities in Australia that are authorised
insurers and trustees of superannuation funds are also
subject to the APRA regulatory regime. Reporting is
supplemented by consultations, on-site inspections
and targeted reviews. Our external auditor also has
an obligation to report on compliance with certain
statutory and regulatory banking requirements and on
any matters that in their opinion may have the potential
to materially prejudice the interests of depositors and
other stakeholders.
Australia’s risk-based capital adequacy guidelines are
based on the approach agreed upon by the BCBS.
National discretion is then applied to that approach,
which has resulted in Australia’s capital requirements
being more stringent. Refer to ‘Capital resources – Basel
Capital Accord’ in Section 2.
The RBA is responsible for monetary policy, maintaining
financial system stability and promoting the safety and
efficiency of the payments system. The RBA is an active
participant in the financial markets, manages Australia’s
foreign reserves, issues Australian currency notes and
serves as banker to the Australian Government.
ASIC is the national regulator of Australian companies
and consumer protection within the financial sector.
Its primary responsibility is to regulate and enforce
company, consumer credit, financial markets and
financial products and services laws that protect
consumers, investors and creditors. With respect
to financial services, it promotes fairness and
transparency by providing consumer protection, using
regulatory powers to enforce laws relating to deposit-
taking activities, general insurance, life insurance,
superannuation, retirement savings accounts, securities
(such as shares, debentures and managed investments)
and futures contracts and financial advice. ASIC has
responsibility for supervising trading on Australia’s
domestic licensed markets and of trading participants.
ASIC has recently had its existing powers strengthened
to provide ASIC with a product intervention power. For
further information, refer to ‘Significant developments’
above.
The ASX operates Australia’s primary national market
for trading of securities issued by listed companies.
Some of our securities (including our ordinary shares)
are listed on the ASX and we therefore have obligations
to comply with the ASX Listing Rules, which have
statutory backing under the Corporations Act 2001
(Cth). The ASX has responsibility for the oversight
of listed entities under the ASX Listing Rules and
for monitoring and enforcing compliance with the
ASX Operating Rules by its market, clearing and
settlement participants. ASX is now also the benchmark
administrator of BBSW.
The ACCC is the regulator responsible for the regulation
and prohibition of anti-competitive and unfair market
practices and mergers and acquisitions in Australia. Its
broad objective is to administer the Competition and
Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) and related legislation to
bring greater competitiveness, fair trading, consumer
protection and product safety to the Australian
economy. The ACCC’s role in consumer protection
complements that of ASIC (for financial services) and
Australian state and territory consumer affairs agencies
that administer the unfair trading legislation of their
jurisdictions.
The Australian Government’s present policy, known
as the ‘four pillars policy’, is that there should be no
fewer than four major banks to maintain appropriate
levels of competition in the banking sector. Under the
Financial Sector (Shareholdings) Act 1998 (Cth), the
Australian Government’s Treasurer must approve an
entity acquiring a stake of more than 15% in a particular
financial sector company.
Proposals for foreign acquisitions of a stake in
Australian banks are subject to the Australian
Government’s foreign investment policy and, where
required, approval by the Australian Government under
the Australian Foreign Acquisitions and Takeovers
Act 1975 (Cth). For further details refer to ‘Limitations
affecting security holders’ in Section 4.
AUSTRAC oversees the compliance of Australian
reporting entities (including Westpac) with the
requirements under the Anti-Money Laundering and
Counter-Terrorism Financing Act 2006 (Cth) and the
Financial Transaction Reports Act 1988 (Cth). These
requirements include:
• implementing programs for identifying and
monitoring customers, and for managing the risks of
money laundering and terrorism financing;
• reporting suspicious matters, threshold transactions
and international funds transfer instructions; and
• submitting an annual compliance report.
AUSTRAC provides financial information to Australian
federal law enforcement, national security, human
services and revenue agencies, and certain international
counterparts.
New Zealand
The Reserve Bank of New Zealand (RBNZ) is
responsible for supervising New Zealand registered
banks and protects the financial stability of New
Zealand through the application of minimum prudential
obligations. The New Zealand prudential supervision
regime requires that registered banks publish disclosure
statements, which contain information on financial
performance and risk positions as well as attestations
by the directors about the bank’s compliance with its
conditions of registration and certain other matters.
242019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Information on Westpac
The Financial Markets Authority (FMA) and the New
Zealand Commerce Commission (NZCC) are the two
primary conduct and enforcement regulators. The FMA
and NZCC are responsible for ensuring that markets are
fair and transparent and are supported by confident
and informed investors and consumers. Regulation of
markets and their participants is undertaken through
a combination of market supervision, corporate
governance and licensing approvals.
In New Zealand, other relevant regulator mandates
include those relating to taxation, privacy and foreign
affairs and trade.
Banks in New Zealand are also subject to a number of
self- regulatory regimes. Examples include Payments
NZ, the New Zealand Bankers’ Association and the
Financial Services Council (FSC). Examples of industry
agreed codes include the New Zealand Bankers’
Association’s Code of Banking Practice and FSC’s Code
of Conduct.
United States
Our New York branch is a US federally licensed branch
and therefore is subject to supervision, examination and
regulation by the US Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency and the Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System (the US Federal Reserve) under the
US International Banking Act of 1978 (IBA) and related
regulations.
A US federal branch must maintain, with a US Federal
Reserve member bank, a capital equivalency deposit
as prescribed by the US Comptroller of the Currency,
which is at least equal to 5% of its total liabilities
(including acceptances, but excluding accrued
expenses, and amounts due and other liabilities to
other branches, agencies and subsidiaries of the foreign
bank).
In addition, a US federal branch is subject to
periodic onsite examination by the US Comptroller
of the Currency. Such examination may address risk
management, operations, asset quality, compliance with
the record-keeping and reporting, and any additional
requirements prescribed by the US Comptroller of the
Currency from time to time.
A US federal branch of a foreign bank is, by virtue of the
IBA, subject to the receivership powers exercisable by
the US Comptroller of the Currency.
As of 22 June 2016, we elected to be treated as a
financial holding company in the US pursuant to
the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 and Federal
Reserve Board Regulation Y. Our election will remain
effective so long as we meet certain capital and
management standards prescribed by the US Federal
Reserve.
Westpac and some of its affiliates are engaged in
various activities that are subject to regulation by
other US federal regulatory agencies, including the
US Securities and Exchange Commission, the US
Commodity Futures Trading Commission and the
National Futures Association.
Anti-money laundering regulation and
related requirements
Australia
Westpac has a Group-wide program to manage
its obligations under the Anti-Money Laundering
and Counter- Terrorism Financing Act 2006 (Cth).
We continue to actively engage with the regulator,
AUSTRAC, on our activities.
Our Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism
Financing Policy (AML/CTF Policy) sets out how the
Westpac Group complies with its legislative obligations.
The AML/CTF Policy applies to all business divisions
and employees (permanent, temporary and third party
providers) working in Australia, New Zealand and
overseas.
United States
The USA PATRIOT Act of 2001 requires US financial
institutions, including the US branches of foreign banks,
to take certain steps to prevent, detect and report
individuals and entities involved in international money
laundering and the financing of terrorism. The required
actions include verifying the identity of financial
institutions and other customers and counterparties,
terminating correspondent accounts for foreign ‘shell
banks’ and obtaining information about the owners
of foreign bank clients and the identity of the foreign
bank’s agent for service of process in the US. The anti-
money laundering compliance requirements of the
USA PATRIOT Act include requirements to adopt and
implement an effective anti-money laundering program,
report suspicious transactions or activities, and
implement due diligence procedures for correspondent
and other customer accounts. Westpac’s New York
branch and Westpac Capital Markets LLC maintain an
anti-money laundering compliance program designed
to address US legal requirements.
US economic and trade sanctions, as administered by
the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), prohibit or
significantly restrict US financial institutions, including
the US branches and operations of foreign banks, and
other US persons from doing business with certain
persons, entities and jurisdictions. Westpac’s New York
branch and Westpac Capital Markets LLC maintain
compliance programs designed to comply with OFAC
sanctions programs, and Westpac has a Group-wide
program to ensure adequate compliance.
Legal proceedings
Our entities are defendants from time to time in legal
proceedings arising from the conduct of our business.
Material legal proceedings, if any, are described
in Note 27 to the financial statements and under
‘Significant developments’ above. Where appropriate
as required by the accounting standards, a provision
has been raised in respect of these proceedings and
disclosed in the financial statements.
Principal office
Our principal office is located at 275 Kent Street,
Sydney, New South Wales, 2000, Australia. Our
telephone number for calls within Australia is (+61) 2
9155 7713 and our international telephone number is
(+61) 2 9155 7700.
25
2019 Westpac Group Annual Report
1
2
3
4
Information on Westpac
Corporate governance statement
Corporate governance is the framework of systems,
policies and processes by which we operate, make
decisions and hold people to account. The framework
establishes the roles and responsibilities of Westpac’s
Board and management. It also establishes the systems,
policies and processes for monitoring and evaluating
Board and management performance and the practices
for corporate reporting, disclosure, remuneration, risk
management and engagement of security holders.
Our approach to corporate governance is based on a
set of values and behaviours that underpin our day-
to-day activities, provide transparency and fair dealing
and seek to protect stakeholder interests. It includes
a commitment to maintaining the highest standards
of corporate governance, which Westpac sees as
fundamental to the sustainability of our business and
our performance.
We regularly review local and global developments in
corporate governance to assess their implications and
to respond to changes in the operating environment.
We also improve our systems, processes and policies
and look to strengthen our frameworks to reflect
changing expectations where appropriate.
We comply with the ASX Corporate Governance
Principles and Recommendations (third edition)
published by the ASX Limited’s Corporate Governance
Council. In addition, we already comply with a number
of the recommendations contained in the fourth edition
of the ASX Corporate Governance Principles and
Recommendations.
Westpac’s 2019 Corporate Governance Statement and a
range of documents referred to in it are available on our
corporate governance website at www.westpac.com.au/
corpgov. This website contains copies and summaries
of charters, principles and policies referred to in the
Corporate Governance Statement.
Websites
Investor communications and information, including this
2019 Westpac Group Annual Report, the 2019 Westpac
Group Annual Review and Sustainability Report, the
2019 Westpac Group Sustainability Performance Report
and investor discussion packs and presentations can be
accessed at www.westpac.com.au/investorcentre.
Information on Westpac
262019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Directors’ report
Directors’ report
Name: Lindsay Maxsted,
DipBus (Gordon), FCA, FAICD
Age: 65
Term of office: Director since
March 2008 and Chairman since
December 2011.
Date of next scheduled re-election:
December 2020.
Independent: Yes.
Current directorships of listed
entities and dates of office:
Transurban Group (since March 2008
and Chairman since August 2010),
BHP Group Limited (since March 2011)
and BHP Group plc (since March 2011).
Other principal directorships:
Managing Director of Align Capital Pty
Ltd and Director of Baker Heart and
Diabetes Institute.
Other interests: Nil.
Other Westpac related entities
directorships and dates of office: Nil.
Skills, experience and expertise:
Lindsay was formerly a partner at
KPMG and was the CEO of that firm
from 2001 to 2007. His principal area
of practice prior to his becoming CEO
was in the corporate recovery field
managing a number of Australia’s
largest insolvency/workout/turnaround
engagements including Linter Textiles
(companies associated with Abraham
Goldberg), Bell Publishing Group,
Bond Brewing, McEwans Hardware
and Brashs. He is also a former
Director and Chairman of the Victorian
Public Transport Corporation.
Westpac Board Committee
membership: Chairman of the Board
Nominations Committee. Member of
each of the Board Audit and Board
Risk & Compliance Committees.
Directorships of other listed entities
over the past three years and dates
of office: Nil.
Name: Brian Hartzer,
BA, CFA
Age: 52
Term of office: Managing Director &
Chief Executive Officer since
February 2015.
Date of next scheduled re-election:
Not applicable.
Independent: No.
Current directorships of listed
entities and dates of office: Nil.
Other principal directorships:
The Australian National University
Business and Industry Advisory
Board (Chairman since March 2017),
the Financial Markets Foundation
for Children and Australian Banking
Association Incorporated.
Other interests: Nil.
Other Westpac related entities
directorships and dates of office: Nil.
Skills, experience and expertise: Brian
was appointed Managing Director &
Chief Executive Officer in February
2015. Brian joined Westpac as Chief
Executive, Australian Financial Services
in June 2012, encompassing Westpac
Retail & Business Banking, St.George
Banking Group and BT Financial
Group. Prior to joining Westpac, Brian
spent three years in the UK as CEO for
Retail, Wealth and Ulster Bank at the
Royal Bank of Scotland Group.
Prior to that, he spent ten years with
Australia and New Zealand Banking
Group Limited (ANZ) in Australia in a
variety of roles, including his final role
as CEO, Australia and Global Segment
Lead for Retail and Wealth. Before
joining ANZ, Brian spent ten years as
a financial services consultant in New
York, San Francisco and Melbourne.
Westpac Board Committee
membership: Member of the Board
Technology Committee.
Directorships of other listed entities
over the past three years and dates
of office: Nil.
Our Directors present
their report together
with the financial
statements of the Group
for the financial year
ended 30 September
2019.
1. Directors
The names of the persons
who have been Directors, or
appointed as Directors, during
the period since 1 October 2018
and up to the date of this report
are: Lindsay Philip Maxsted,
Brian Charles Hartzer, Nerida
Frances Caesar, Ewen Graham
Wolseley Crouch, Catriona
Alison Deans (Alison Deans),
Craig William Dunn, Yuen Mei
Anita Fung (Anita Fung), Steven
John Harker (Director from
1 March 2019), Peter John Oswin
Hawkins (retired as a Director on
12 December 2018), Peter Ralph
Marriott, Peter Stanley Nash and
Margaret Leone Seale (Director
from 1 March 2019).
Particulars of the skills,
experience, expertise and
responsibilities of the Directors
at the date of this report,
including all directorships of
other listed companies held
by a Director at any time in
the three years immediately
before 30 September 2019
and the period for which each
directorship has been held, are
set out in the following pages.
272019 Westpac Group Annual Report
1
2
3
4
Directors’ report
Name: Ewen Crouch AM,
BEc (Hons.), LLB, FAICD
Age: 63
Term of office: Director since
February 2013.
Date of next scheduled re-election:
December 2019.
Independent: Yes.
Current directorships of listed
entities and dates of office: Corporate
Travel Management Limited (Chairman
since March 2019) and BlueScope
Steel Limited (since March 2013).
Other principal directorships: Sydney
Symphony Orchestra Holdings Pty
Limited and Jawun.
Other interests: Member of the
Commonwealth Remuneration
Tribunal, Law Committee of the
Australian Institute of Company
Directors, Corporations Committee
of the Law Council of Australia and
ASIC’s Director Advisory Panel.
Other Westpac related entities
directorships and dates of office: Nil.
Skills, experience and expertise:
Ewen was a Partner at Allens from
1988 to 2013, where he was one
of Australia’s most accomplished
mergers and acquisitions lawyers.
He served as a member of the firm’s
board for 11 years, including four years
as Chairman of Partners. His other
roles at Allens included Co-Head
Mergers and Acquisitions and Equity
Capital Markets, Executive Partner,
Asian offices and Deputy Managing
Partner. Ewen served as a director of
Mission Australia from 1995 and as
Chairman from 2009, before retiring
in November 2016. From 2010 to 2015,
Ewen was a member of the Takeovers
Panel. In 2013, Ewen was awarded
an Order of Australia in recognition
of his significant service to the law
as a contributor to legal professional
organisations and to the community.
Westpac Board Committee
membership: Chairman of the Board
Risk & Compliance Committee.
Member of each of the Board Audit,
Board Nominations and Board
Remuneration Committees.
Directorships of other listed entities
over the past three years and dates
of office: Nil.
Name: Nerida Caesar,
BCom, MBA, GAICD
Age: 55
Term of office: Director since
September 2017.
Date of next scheduled re-election:
December 2019.
Independent: Yes.
Current directorships of listed
entities and dates of office: Nil.
Other principal directorships:
Workplace Giving Australia Limited
(Chairman since June 2019) and Spark
Investment Holdco Pty Ltd.
Other interests: Member of the
Advisory Board of IXUP Limited.
Advisor to Equifax Australia and
New Zealand.
Other Westpac related entities
directorships and dates of office: Nil.
Skills, experience and expertise:
Nerida has over 30 years of broad-
ranging commercial and business
management experience. She was
Group Managing Director and Chief
Executive Officer, Australia and New
Zealand, of Equifax (formerly Veda
Group Limited) from February 2011
to June 2017. Nerida is also a former
director of Genome.One Pty Ltd and
Stone and Chalk Limited.
Ms Caesar was formerly Group
Managing Director, Telstra Enterprise
and Government, responsible for
Telstra’s corporate, government and
large business customers in Australia
as well as the international sales
division. Nerida also worked as Group
Managing Director, Telstra Wholesale,
and, prior to that, held the position
of Executive Director Enterprise
& Government, where she was
responsible for managing products,
services, and customer relationships
throughout Australia.
Nerida also held several senior
management and sales positions with
IBM within Australia and internationally
over a 20-year period, including as
Vice President of IBM’s Intel Server
Division for the Asia Pacific region.
Westpac Board Committee
membership: Member of each of the
Board Risk & Compliance and Board
Technology Committees.
Directorships of other listed entities
over the past three years and dates
of office: Nil.
Name: Alison Deans,
BA, MBA, GAICD
Age: 51
Term of office: Director since
April 2014.
Date of next scheduled re-election:
December 2020.
Independent: Yes.
Current directorships of listed
entities and dates of office: Cochlear
Limited (since January 2015) and
Ramsay Health Care Limited (since
November 2018).
Other principal directorships:
SCEGGS Darlinghurst Limited, The
Observership Program Limited and
Deputy Group Pty Ltd.
Other interests: Senior Advisor,
McKinsey & Company and Investment
Committee member of the CSIRO
Innovation Fund (Main Sequence
Ventures).
Other Westpac related entities
directorships and dates of office: Nil.
Skills, experience and expertise:
Alison has more than 20 years’
experience in senior executive roles
focused on building digital businesses
and digital transformation across
e-commerce, media and financial
services. During this time, Alison
served as the CEO of eCorp Limited,
CEO of Hoyts Cinemas and CEO of
eBay, Australia and New Zealand. She
was the CEO of a technology-based
investment company netus Pty Ltd.
Alison was an Independent Director
of Social Ventures Australia from
September 2007 to April 2013 and a
director of kikki.K Holdings Pty Ltd
from October 2014 to June 2018.
Westpac Board Committee
membership: Chairman of the Board
Technology Committee. Member
of each of the Board Nominations,
Board Remuneration and Board Risk &
Compliance Committees.
Directorships of other listed entities
over the past three years and
dates of office: Insurance Australia
Group Limited (February 2013 –
October 2017).
282019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Directors’ report
Directors’ report
Name: Anita Fung,
BSocSc, MAppFin
Age: 58
Term of office: Director since
October 2018.
Date of next scheduled re-election:
December 2021.
Independent: Yes.
Current directorships of listed
entities and dates of office: Hong
Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited
(since April 2015, Hong Kong listed),
China Construction Bank Corporation
(since October 2016, Hong Kong
Listed) and Hang Lung Properties
Limited (since May 2015, Hong Kong
listed).
Other principal directorships: Board
member of the Airport Authority Hong
Kong.
Other interests: Member of the Hong
Kong Museum Advisory Committee.
Other Westpac related entities
directorships and dates of office:
Member of Westpac’s Asia Advisory
Board since October 2018.
Skills, experience and expertise:
Anita’s career in the banking industry
spans over 30 years, including 19 years
at HSBC.
During her time at HSBC, Anita held a
number of senior management roles
including Group General Manager,
HSBC Group and most recently as
Chief Executive Officer, Hong Kong
from 2011 to 2015.
Prior to joining HSBC, Anita held
various positions at Standard
Chartered Bank in its Treasury and
Capital markets business.
Westpac Board Committee
membership: Member of the Board
Risk & Compliance Committee.
Directorships of other listed entities
over the past three years and dates
of office: Nil.
Name: Craig Dunn,
BCom, FCA
Age: 56
Term of office: Director since
June 2015.
Date of next scheduled re-election:
December 2021.
Independent: Yes.
Current directorships of listed
entities and dates of office: Telstra
Corporation Limited (since April 2016).
Other principal directorships:
Chairman of The Australian Ballet.
Other interests: Chairman of the
International Standards Technical
Committee on Blockchain and
Distributed Ledger Technologies (ISO/
TC 307) and consultant to King &
Wood Mallesons.
Other Westpac related entities
directorships and dates of office: Nil.
Skills, experience and expertise: Craig
has more than 20 years’ experience
in financial services, including as
CEO of AMP Limited from 2008 to
2013. Craig was previously a director
of Financial Literacy Australia
Limited, a Board member of each
of the Australian Japanese Business
Cooperation Committee, Jobs for
New South Wales, and the New
South Wales Government’s Financial
Services Knowledge Hub. He is the
former Chairman of Stone and Chalk
Limited and of the Investment and
Financial Services Association (now
the Financial Services Council). Craig
was also a member of the Financial
Services Advisory Committee, the
Australian Financial Centre Forum,
the Consumer and Financial Literacy
Taskforce and a Panel member of the
Australian Government’s Financial
System Inquiry.
Westpac Board Committee
membership: Chairman of the Board
Remuneration Committee. Member of
each of the Board Nominations and
Board Risk & Compliance Committees.
Directorships of other listed entities
over the past three years and dates
of office: Nil.
Name: Steven Harker,
BEc (Hons.), LLB
Age: 64
Term of office: Director since
March 2019.
Date of next scheduled re-election:
December 2019.
Independent: Yes.
Current directorships of listed
entities and dates of office: Nil.
Other principal directorships: The
Banking and Finance Oath Limited,
The Hunger Project Australia, ASX
Refinitiv Charity Foundation, New
South Wales Golf Club Foundation
Limited and Ascham School Ltd.
Other interests: Honorary Treasurer of
Ascham School.
Other Westpac related entities
directorships and dates of office: Nil.
Skills, experience and expertise:
Steve has over 35 years of experience
in investment banking. Steve was
formerly Managing Director and Chief
Executive Officer of Morgan Stanley
Australia from 1998 to 2016 and then
Vice Chairman until February 2019.
Prior to joining Morgan Stanley, he
spent fifteen years with Barclays de
Zoete Wedd (BZW, now Barclays
Investment Bank).
Steve is a former Chairman and
Director of Australian Financial
Markets Association Limited and a
former Director of Investa Property
Group. Steve also previously served
on the board of the Centre for
International Finance and Regulation.
He is also a former Guardian of the
Future Fund of Australia.
Westpac Board Committee
membership: Member of each of
the Board Audit and Board Risk &
Compliance Committees.
Directorships of other listed entities
over the past three years and dates
of office: Nil.
292019 Westpac Group Annual Report
1
2
3
4
Directors’ report
Directors’ report
Name: Peter Nash,
BCom, FCA, F Fin
Age: 57
Term of office: Director since
March 2018.
Date of next scheduled re-election:
December 2021.
Independent: Yes.
Current directorships of listed
entities and dates of office: Johns
Lyng Group Limited (Chairman since
October 2017), Mirvac Group (since
November 2018) and ASX Limited
(since June 2019).
Other principal directorships:
Reconciliation Australia Limited and
Golf Victoria Limited.
Other interests: Board member
of the Koorie Heritage Trust and
Migration Council Australia. Member
of the University of Melbourne Centre
for Contemporary Chinese Studies
Advisory Board.
Other Westpac related entities
directorships and dates of office: Nil.
Skills, experience and expertise: Peter
was formerly a Senior Partner with
KPMG until September 2017, having
been admitted to the partnership
of KPMG Australia in 1993. He most
recently served as the National
Chairman of KPMG Australia from
2011 until August 2017, where he was
responsible for the overall governance
and strategic positioning of KPMG in
Australia. In this role, Peter also served
as a member of KPMG’s Global and
Regional Boards.
Peter has experience providing
advice on a range of topics
including business strategy, risk
management, internal controls,
business processes and regulatory
change. He has also provided both
financial and commercial advice to
many Government businesses at
both a Federal and State level. Peter
is a former member of the Business
Council of Australia and its Economic
and Regulatory Committee.
Westpac Board Committee
membership: Member of each of
the Board Audit and Board Risk &
Compliance Committees.
Directorships of other listed entities
over the past three years and dates
of office: Nil.
Name: Peter Marriott,
BEc (Hons.), FCA
Age: 62
Term of office: Director since
June 2013.
Date of next scheduled re-election:
December 2019.
Independent: Yes.
Current directorships of listed
entities and dates of office: ASX
Limited (since July 2009).
Other principal directorships: ASX
Clearing Corporation Limited, ASX
Settlement Corporation Limited and
Austraclear Limited.
Other interests: Member of Monash
University Council and Chairman of the
Monash University Council’s Resources
and Finance Committee.
Other Westpac related entities
directorships and dates of office: Nil.
Skills, experience and expertise: Peter
has over 30 years’ experience in senior
management roles in the finance
industry, encompassing international
banking, finance and auditing. Peter
joined Australia and New Zealand
Banking Group Limited (ANZ) in 1993
and held the role of Chief Financial
Officer from July 1997 to May 2012.
Prior to his career at ANZ, Peter was
a banking and finance, audit and
consulting partner at KPMG Peat
Marwick. Peter was formerly a Director
of ANZ National Bank Limited in New
Zealand and various ANZ subsidiaries.
Westpac Board Committee
membership: Chairman of the
Board Audit Committee. Member
of each of the Board Nominations,
Board Technology and Board Risk &
Compliance Committees.
Directorships of other listed entities
over the past three years and dates
of office: Nil.
Name: Margaret (Margie) Seale,
BA, FAICD
Age: 59
Term of office: Director since
March 2019.
Date of next scheduled re-election:
December 2019.
Independent: Yes.
Current directorships of listed
entities and dates of office: Telstra
Corporation Limited (since May 2012)
and Scentre Group Limited (since
February 2016).
Other principal directorships:
Australian Pacific (Holdings) Pty
Limited.
Other interests: Member of the
Australian Public Service Commission
Centre for Learning and Leadership
Advisory Board.
Other Westpac related entities
directorships and dates of office: Nil.
Skills, experience and expertise:
Margie has more than 25 years’
experience in senior executive
roles in Australia and overseas,
including in consumer goods, global
publishing, sales and marketing,
and the successful transition of
traditional business models to
digital environments. Prior to her
non-executive career, Margie was
the Managing Director of Random
House Australia and New Zealand
and President, Asia Development for
Random House Inc.
Margie is a former Director and
then Chair of Penguin Random
House Australia Pty Limited, and a
former Director of Ramsay Health
Care Limited, Bank of Queensland
Limited and the Australian Publishers’
Association. She also previously served
on the boards of Chief Executive
Women (chairing its Scholarship
Committee), the Powerhouse Museum,
and the Sydney Writers Festival.
Westpac Board Committee
membership: Member of each of the
Board Remuneration and Board Risk &
Compliance Committees.
Directorships of other listed entities
over the past three years and dates
of office: Ramsay Health Care Limited
(April 2015 to October 2018) and Bank
of Queensland Limited (January 2014
to June 2018).
302019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Directors’ report
Company Secretary
Our Company Secretaries as at 30 September 2019 were Rebecca Lim and Tim Hartin.
Rebecca Lim (B Econ, LLB (Hons.)) was appointed Group Executive, Compliance, Legal & Secretariat
1
and
Company Secretary in October 2016. Rebecca joined Westpac in 2002 and has held a variety of senior leadership
roles including General Manager, Human Resources for St.George Bank and General Manager, St.George Private
Clients. She was appointed Group General Counsel in November 2011 and Chief Compliance Officer from 2013
to 2017. Rebecca held an in-house role in investment banking at Goldman Sachs in London before returning to
Australia and joining Westpac. Rebecca was previously with US firm Skadden Arps where she worked in the
Corporate Finance area in both New York and London. Prior to that she worked at Blake Dawson Waldron (now
Ashurst) as a solicitor.
Tim Hartin (LLB (Hons.)) was appointed Group Company Secretary in November 2011. Before that appointment,
Tim was Head of Legal - Risk Management & Workouts, Counsel & Secretariat and prior to that, he was Counsel,
Corporate Core. Before joining Westpac in 2006, Tim was a Consultant with Gilbert + Tobin, where he provided
corporate advisory services to ASX listed companies. Tim was previously a lawyer at Henderson Boyd Jackson W.S.
in Scotland and in London in Herbert Smith’s corporate and corporate finance division.
2. Executive Team
As at 30 September 2019 our Executive Team was:
Name Position
Year Joined
Group
Year
Appointed
to Position
Brian HartzerManaging Director & Chief Executive Officer20122015
Craig BrightChief Information Officer20182018
Lyn CobleyChief Executive, Westpac Institutional Bank20152015
Peter KingChief Financial Officer19942014
Rebecca LimGroup Executive, Legal & Secretariat20022016
David LindbergChief Executive, Consumer20122019
Carolyn McCannGroup Executive, Customer & Corporate Relations20132018
David McLeanChief Executive Officer, Westpac New Zealand19992015
Christine ParkerGroup Executive, Human Resources20072011
David StephenChief Risk Officer20182018
Gary ThursbyChief Operating Officer20082019
Alastair WelshActing Chief Executive, Business19922019
There are no family relationships between or among any of our Directors or Executive Team members.
1. From 1 October 2018, Rebecca Lim’s role and title has been Group Executive, Legal & Secretariat.
312019 Westpac Group Annual Report
1
2
3
4
Directors’ report
Craig Bright
B.Comp.
Age: 54
Chief Information Officer
Craig was appointed Group Chief
Information Officer in December
2018. Craig has more than 30 years’
experience in technology and financial
services. He has held divisional CIO
roles in retail banking, business
banking and investment banking and
led complex global scale technology
operations.
Prior to joining Westpac, Craig was
Chief Technology Officer, Global
Consumer Bank at Citigroup. He led
a division of technology employees
executing a cloud and mobile first
strategy supporting digital channels
and a mix of Citi Smart Banking
formats worldwide. Craig has also held
senior roles at Barclays in London,
National Australia Bank and Ernst &
Young.
Craig has a Bachelor of Computing
from Monash University and a
Computer Field Service Certificate
from Royal Melbourne Institute of
Technology.
Brian Hartzer
BA, CFA.
Age: 52
Managing Director & Chief Executive
Officer
Brian was appointed Managing
Director & Chief Executive Officer in
February 2015. Brian joined Westpac
as Chief Executive, Australian Financial
Services in June 2012, encompassing
Westpac Retail & Business Banking,
St.George Banking Group and BT
Financial Group.
Brian is a Director of the Australian
Banking Association and was formerly
the Chairman until December 2015.
Prior to joining Westpac, Brian spent
three years in the UK as CEO for
Retail, Wealth and Ulster Bank at the
Royal Bank of Scotland Group. Prior to
that, he spent ten years with Australia
and New Zealand Banking Group
Limited (ANZ) in Australia in a variety
of roles, including his final role as CEO,
Australia and Global Segment Lead for
Retail and Wealth. Before joining ANZ,
Brian spent ten years as a financial
services consultant in New York, San
Francisco and Melbourne.
Brian graduated from Princeton
University with a degree in European
History and is a Chartered Financial
Analyst.
Lyn Cobley
BEc, SF FIN, GAICD.
Age: 56
Chief Executive, Westpac Institutional
Bank
Lyn was appointed Chief Executive,
Westpac Institutional Bank in
September 2015. She has responsibility
for Westpac’s global relationships
with corporate, institutional and
government clients as well as all
products across financial and capital
markets, transactional banking,
structured finance and working capital
payments. In addition, Lyn oversees
Westpac’s International and Pacific
Island businesses.
Lyn has over 27 years’ experience
in financial services. Prior to joining
Westpac, Lyn held a variety of senior
positions at the Commonwealth Bank
of Australia, including serving as Group
Treasurer from 2007 to 2013 and most
recently as Executive General Manager,
Retail Products & Third Party Banking.
She also held senior roles at Barclays
Capital in Australia and Citibank in
Australia and Asia Pacific, and was
CEO of Trading Room (a joint venture
between Macquarie Bank and Fairfax).
Lyn is a Board member of the
Australian Financial Markets
Association (AFMA), the Banking
& Finance Oath and the Westpac
Foundation. She is Chairman of
Westpac’s Asia Advisory Board and
is also a member of Chief Executive
Women.
Lyn has a Bachelor of Economics
from Macquarie University, is a Senior
Fellow of the Financial Services
Institute of Australia and is a graduate
of the Australian Institute of Company
Directors.
322019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Directors’ report
Rebecca Lim
B Econ, LLB (Hons).
Age: 47
Group Executive, Legal & Secretariat
Rebecca was appointed as a Westpac
Group Executive in October 2016 and
is responsible for legal and secretariat
functions globally. She was appointed
Group General Counsel in November
2011 and was Chief Compliance Officer
from 2013 to 2017.
Rebecca joined Westpac in 2002
and has held a variety of other senior
leadership roles including General
Manager, Human Resources for
St.George Bank and General Manager,
St.George Private Clients.
Rebecca began her career at Blake
Dawson Waldron (now Ashurst) before
joining the US firm Skadden Arps
where she worked in both New York
and London. Rebecca then moved into
an in-house role in investment banking
at Goldman Sachs in London before
returning to Australia and joining
Westpac.
Rebecca is Deputy Chair of the GC100
Executive Committee and a member
of Chief Executive Women.
Peter King
BEc, FCA.
Age: 49
Chief Financial Officer
Peter was appointed Chief Financial
Officer in April 2014. Peter has
responsibility for Westpac’s Finance,
Tax, Treasury and Investor Relations
functions.
Prior to this appointment, Peter was
the Deputy Chief Financial Officer for
three years and has held other senior
finance positions across the Group,
including in Group Finance, Business
and Consumer Banking, Business and
Technology Services, Treasury and
Financial Markets.
Peter commenced his career at
Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu. He has
a Bachelor of Economics from
Sydney University and completed the
Advanced Management Programme at
INSEAD. He is a Fellow of the Institute
of Chartered Accountants.
David Lindberg
HBA (Hons. Economics).
Age: 44
Chief Executive, Consumer
David was appointed Chief Executive,
Consumer in April 2019, responsible
for the end to end relationships with
consumer customers. This includes
all consumer distribution, digital,
marketing, banking and insurance
products and services under the
Westpac, St.George, BankSA, Bank
of Melbourne, BT, and RAMS brands.
Prior to this appointment, David was
Chief Executive, Business Bank from
June 2015, managing relationships
with business customers for the
Westpac, St.George, BankSA and Bank
of Melbourne brands.
Before this David was Chief Product
Officer for the Group’s retail and
business products, as well as
overseeing the Group’s digital
activities. Before joining Westpac in
2012, David was Executive General
Manager, Cards, Payments & Retail
Strategy at the Commonwealth Bank
of Australia. David was also formerly
Managing Director, Strategy, Marketing
& Customer Segmentation at Australia
and New Zealand Banking Group
Limited and Vice President and Head
of Australia for First Manhattan.
332019 Westpac Group Annual Report
1
2
3
4
Directors’ report
David McLean
LLB (Hons.).
Age: 61
Chief Executive Officer, Westpac New
Zealand
David was appointed Chief Executive
Officer, Westpac New Zealand in
February 2015. Since joining Westpac
in February 1999, David has held a
number of senior roles, including Head
of Debt Capital Markets New Zealand,
General Manager, Private, Wealth and
Insurance New Zealand and Head
of Westpac Institutional Bank New
Zealand, and most recently, Managing
Director of the Westpac New York
branch.
Before joining Westpac, David was
Director, Capital Markets at Deutsche
Morgan Grenfell from 1994. He also
established the New Zealand branch of
Deutsche Bank and was New Zealand
Resident Branch Manager. In 1988,
David joined Southpac/National Bank
as a Capital Markets Executive. Prior
to this, David worked as a lawyer in
private practice and also served as
in-house counsel for NatWest NZ from
1985.
Carolyn McCann
BBus (Com), BA, GradDipAppFin,
GAICD.
Age: 47
Group Executive, Customer &
Corporate Relations
Carolyn was appointed as Westpac’s
Group Executive, Customer &
Corporate Relations in June 2018.
This division brings together
management of the Group’s
customer resolution and reporting,
alongside our corporate affairs,
communications and sustainability
functions, recognising the importance
of setting high service standards and
quickly resolving customer issues in
managing the Group’s relationship
with its customers. Carolyn joined
the Westpac Group in 2013, as
General Manager, Corporate Affairs
& Sustainability, during which time
she played an instrumental role in
leading the Group’s bicentenary
program, including the launch of the
$100 million Westpac Scholars Trust
(formerly known as the Westpac
Bicentennial Foundation).
Prior to joining Westpac, Carolyn
spent 13 years at Insurance Australia
Group in various positions, including
Group General Manager, Corporate
Affairs & Investor Relations. Carolyn
began her career in consulting and
has extensive experience in financial
services.
Christine Parker
BGDipBus (HRM).
Age: 59
Group Executive, Human Resources
Christine was appointed to Westpac
Group’s Executive Team in October
2011. As Group Executive, Human
Resources, Christine leads the HR
function for the Group, responsible
for strengthening our service oriented
and inclusive culture, attracting and
retaining the best talent, developing
and helping our workforce to grow
skills for the future, rewarding and
recognising our people and ensuring
the health and wellbeing of our
people. Christine also oversees the
Group’s Customer Advocate function,
corporate communications, and
supports the CEO and Board on
culture and conduct. Christine also has
responsibility for Office of the Banking
Executive Accountability Regime.
Since joining Westpac in 2007,
Christine has held a variety of senior
leadership roles including Group
General Manager, Human Resources
and General Manager, Human
Resources for Westpac New Zealand
Limited. Before joining Westpac,
Christine held senior HR roles in a
number of high profile organisations
and across a range of industries,
including Carter Holt Harvey and
Restaurant Brands New Zealand.
Christine was previously a Director
of Women’s Community Shelters
and is a current member of Chief
Executive Women, Governor of
St.George Foundation and member
of the Veterans’ Employment Industry
Advisory Committee.
342019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Directors’ report
Gary Thursby
BEc, DipAcc, FCA.
Age: 56
Chief Operating Officer
Gary was appointed Chief Operating
Officer in April 2019, having previously
been in the role of Group Executive,
Strategy & Enterprise Services since
October 2016. In addition to leading
the Group’s strategy function, his
role is designed to support delivery
of the Group’s Service Revolution
and provide services to support the
Group’s operating businesses.
Gary’s responsibilities also include
banking operations, advice
remediation, procurement, property,
analytics and enterprise investments.
In addition, Gary oversees the Group’s
corporate and business development
portfolios.
Before joining Westpac in 2008,
Gary held a number of senior finance
roles at Commonwealth Bank of
Australia including Deputy CFO and
CFO Retail Bank. Gary has over 20
years’ experience in financial services,
covering finance, M&A and large scale
program delivery. He commenced his
career at Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu.
Gary has a Bachelor of Economics
and a Post Graduate Diploma in
Accounting from Flinders University of
South Australia and is a Fellow of the
Institute of Chartered Accountants.
David Stephen
BBus.
Age: 55
Chief Risk Officer
David was appointed Chief Risk Officer
in October 2018, with responsibility
for risk management and compliance
activities across the Group.
Prior to this, David was the Chief Risk
Officer for Royal Bank of Scotland
(RBS) from 2013, having first joined
RBS in 2010 as the Deputy Chief Risk
Officer. David has also previously held
other senior roles at both retail and
investment banks in the UK, USA,
Hong Kong and Australia, including
serving as Chief Risk Officer at ANZ
and Chief Credit Officer at Credit
Suisse Financial Products.
David has a Bachelor of Business in
Banking and Finance from Monash
University and is a Board member of
both the International Financial Risk
Institute and the Financial Services
Institute of Australia (FINSIA).
Alastair Welsh
MBA, BCA, CA.
Age: 54
Acting Chief Executive, Business
Alastair was appointed Acting Chief
Executive, Business in April 2019.
The Business division leads
relationships with Australia’s small,
commercial, corporate and agri
businesses providing a wide range of
banking services and support across
Westpac, St George, BankSA, Bank of
Melbourne and Capital Finance brands.
The division also supports customers’
wealth and investment needs including
Private Wealth, Superannuation,
Platforms, Investments and Operations
businesses through all of our brands.
Alastair holds more than 30 years’
experience in banking in the UK, New
Zealand and Australia. Since joining
Westpac NZ in 1992, he has held a
variety of roles from relationship
management through to leadership
positions for Small Business Banking,
BT Financial Group and Group
Customer Transformation. Prior to this
appointment, Alastair was General
Manager for the Westpac Commercial
Business Bank.
352019 Westpac Group Annual Report
1
2
3
4
Directors’ report
3. Report on the business
a) Principal activities
The principal activities of the Group during the
financial year ended 30 September 2019 were the
provision of financial services including lending, deposit
taking, payments services, investment platforms,
superannuation and funds management, insurance
services, leasing finance, general finance, interest rate
risk management and foreign exchange services.
From 30 June 2019 and 30 September 2019 respectively,
Westpac ceased to provide personal financial advice
through its salaried BT Financial Group planners or its
authorised representatives. Other than this change, there
have been no significant changes in the nature of the
principal activities of the Group during 2019.
b) Operating and financial review
The net profit attributable to owners of Westpac
Banking Corporation for 2019 was $6,784 million, a
decrease of $1,311 million or 16% compared to 2018. Key
features of this result were:
• Net interest income increased $402 million or 2%
compared to 2018 driven by an increase of $686
million due to the reclassification of line fees from
net fee income to interest income, partly offset by
$239 million increase in provisions for estimated
customer refunds, payments, associated costs, and
litigation. Excluding the impact of these items, net
interest income was flat compared to 2018. Average
interest earning assets grew 3% primarily from
Australian and New Zealand housing, broadly offset
by a lower margin. Reported net interest margin
decreased 1 basis point to 2.12%.
• Net fee income decreased $769 million or
32% compared to 2018 primarily due to the
reclassification of line fees to net interest income
($667 million in 2018) and $126 million increase
in provisions for estimated customer refunds,
payments, associated costs and litigation.
• Net wealth management and insurance income
decreased $1,032 million or 50% compared to 2018
primarily due to additional provisions for estimated
customer refunds, payments, associated costs, and
litigation of $531 million, higher general insurance
claims from severe weather events $69 million,
cessation of grandfathered advice commissions $42
million, lower wealth management income due to
changes in platform pricing structure, and exit of the
Hastings business in 2018.
• Trading income decreased $16 million or 2%
compared to 2018. The decline mainly relates to
a change in methodology in derivative valuation
adjustments partially offset by higher non-customer
income.
• Other income is up $57 million or 79% compared
to 2018, primarily due to the non-repeat of a 2018
impairment charge on an equity holding of $104
million.
• Operating expenses increased $540 million or
6% compared to 2018. The increase was mainly
due to a $349 million increase in provisions for
estimated customer refunds, payments, associated
costs, and litigation, higher technology expenses
of $174 million, a rise in regulatory, compliance and
investment related spend of $170 million, partially
offset by the exit of the Hastings business in 2018 of
$158 million and a net productivity benefit.
• Impairment charges were $84 million or 12% higher
compared to 2018. Asset quality remained sound,
with stressed exposures as a percentage of total
committed exposures at 1.20%, up 12 basis points
over the year.
A review of the operations of the Group and its
divisions and their results for the financial year ended
30 September 2019 is set out in Section 2 of the Annual
Report under the sections ‘Review of Group operations’
(see pages 79 to 92), ‘Divisional performance’ (see
pages 93 to 101) and ‘Risk and risk management’ (see
pages 102 to 120), which form part of this report.
Further information about our financial position and
financial results is included in the financial statements in
Section 3 of this Annual Report (see pages 135 to 288),
which form part of this report.
c) Dividends
Since 30 September 2019, Westpac has announced
a final ordinary dividend of 80 cents per Westpac
ordinary share, totalling approximately $2,791 million
for the year ended 30 September 2019 (2018 final
ordinary dividend of 94 cents per Westpac ordinary
share, totalling $3,227 million). The dividend will be fully
franked and will be paid on 20 December 2019.
An interim ordinary dividend for the current financial
year of 94 cents per Westpac ordinary share for the half
year ended 31 March 2019, totalling $3,239 million, was
paid as a fully franked dividend on 24 June 2019 (2018
interim ordinary dividend of 94 cents per Westpac
ordinary share, totalling $3,213 million). The payment
comprised direct cash disbursements of $2,080 million
with $1,159 million being reinvested by participants
through the DRP.
Further, in respect of the year ended 30 September
2018, a fully franked final dividend of 94 cents per
ordinary share totalling $3,227 million was paid on 20
December 2018. The payment comprised direct cash
disbursements of $2,897 million with $330 million, being
reinvested by participants through the DRP.
New shares were issued under the DRP for each of
the 2018 final ordinary dividend and the 2019 interim
ordinary dividend.
362019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Directors’ report
d) Significant changes in state of affairs and events
during and since the end of the 2019 financial year
Throughout the financial year ended 30 September
2019, the Group has operated in a challenging external
environment, which has included ongoing and
heightened scrutiny across the industry (including as
a result of the Royal Commission into Misconduct in
the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services
Industry and self-assessments into governance, culture
and accountability), as well as challenging economic
conditions (refer to the section ‘External environment’
for more details).
In this environment, significant changes in the state of
affairs of the Group were:
• changes to Westpac’s wealth strategy, which
resulted in major BT Financial Group businesses
being realigned into the Consumer and Business
divisions and exiting the provision of personal
financial advice by Westpac Group salaried financial
advisers and authorised representatives;
• compliance, reputation and remediation provisions;
• APRA applying an additional $500 million to
Westpac’s operational risk capital requirement as a
result of Westpac’s self-assessment into its culture,
governance and accountability;
• the issuance of approximately A$1.42 billion AT1
securities, known as Westpac Capital Notes 6, which
qualify as Additional Tier 1 capital under APRA’s
capital adequacy framework, as well as the transfer
and redemption of approximately A$1.38 billion
Westpac Capital Notes; and
• ongoing regulatory changes and developments,
which have included changes relating to financial
services, the expansion of penalties for financial
sector misconduct, the provision of new powers
to regulators, accounting standards, access to
data, information security and other regulatory
requirements.
For a discussion of these matters, please refer to
‘Significant developments’ in Section 1 of the Annual
Report, which forms part of this report (see pages
15 to 22).
On 4 November 2019, Westpac announced that it will
be undertaking an underwritten placement of fully
paid ordinary shares in Westpac to sophisticated and
institutional investors to raise $2 billion. As further
announced, following the placement, Westpac will make
a share purchase plan available to eligible shareholders
and is targeting to raise approximately $500 million.
The proceeds received under the placement and share
purchase plan will be used to strengthen Westpac’s
regulatory capital position.
Other than set out above, the Directors are not aware
of any other matter or circumstance that has occurred
since 30 September 2019 that has significantly affected
or may significantly affect the operations of the Group,
the results of these operations or the state of affairs of
the Group in subsequent financial years.
e) Business strategies, developments and expected
results
Our business strategies, prospects and likely major
developments in the Group’s operations in future
financial years and the expected results of those
operations are discussed below and in ‘Significant
developments’ in Section 1 of the Annual Report
(see pages 15 to 22), which forms part of this report.
External environment
2019 has been another challenging period for financial
services companies, including Westpac. In particular,
the Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking,
Superannuation and Financial Services Industry,
combined with self-assessments into governance,
culture and accountability conducted across the
industry have brought to light examples of poor
behaviour affecting customers, shortcomings in the
management of non-financial risks, and weak risk
cultures. These have added to the erosion of public
sentiment and trust in the financial services industry.
Westpac has taken these developments very seriously
and is now working to respond to the findings of the
Royal Commission’s final report (released 1 February
2019) and its own CGA self-assessment. At the same
time, the Group has been focused on identifying where
we got it wrong for customers and putting things right.
These efforts aim to strengthen the Group’s focus on
leadership, governance and culture, and create better
outcomes for customers and shareholders.
These issues for Westpac, and the sector, have
been accompanied by a weakening in the economic
environment with lower GDP growth, continued weak
wages growth and subdued business and consumer
sentiment. At the same time, interest rates have fallen
to unprecedented lows. For financial services, this has
contributed to more cautious demand for lending,
a decline in deposit growth, lower house prices, and
structural pressures on net interest margins. While
credit growth has slowed, competition has remained
intense across the sector including from domestic and
international banks, and from non-banks.
Business Strategy
The changing environment in which we operate
has reinforced the need to deliver better customer
outcomes and experiences, and underlined the
importance of continuing to deliver on our vision and
strategy, including the Service Revolution.
Westpac’s vision is ‘To be one of the world’s great
service companies, helping our customers, communities
and people to prosper and grow’.
In delivering on our strategy, we are focused on our core
markets, including Australia and New Zealand, where
we provide a comprehensive range of financial products
and services that we believe assist us in meeting the
financial services needs of customers.
With over 14 million customers
1
, our focus is on organic
growth, growing customer numbers in our chosen
segments and building stronger and deeper customer
relationships.
1. All customers with an active relationship (excludes channel only and potential relationships) as at 30 September 2019.
372019 Westpac Group Annual Report
1
2
3
4
Directors’ report
A key element of this approach is our portfolio of
financial services brands, which we believe enables us
to appeal to a broader range of customers and provides
us with the flexibility to offer solutions that better meet
individual customer needs.
As we continue to build the business, the financial
services environment remains challenging and has
required us to maintain focus on our financial position.
This has involved:
• maintaining the high level and quality of our capital;
• continuing to improve our funding and liquidity
position; and
• seeking to maintain a high level of asset quality and
appropriate provisioning.
We continue to focus on ways to simplify our business
to make it easier for customers to do business with us
and to make work better for our people. We believe
these improvement efforts deliver better customer
outcomes while also creating capacity for investment.
Throughout 2019 we continued our focus on seeking
to deliver positive outcomes for our customers
and shareholders through our Service Revolution
transformation.
The Service Revolution is seeking to:
• provide a truly personal service for customers while
better anticipating their needs;
• put customers in control of their finances;
• respond to the increased pace of innovation,
disruption and changing customer behaviours
through digitisation and increasing our capacity for
innovation; and
• innovate and simplify to reinvent the customer
experience.
As part of our delivery of the Service Revolution, we
have developed an integrated, multi-year plan that will
be executed across the Group. In 2019, we continued to
deliver outcomes and milestones on a number of our
transformation programs focused on the digitisation
of the company through the design and development
of a single bank technology infrastructure. We expect
this will transform customer experiences and drive
operational efficiency. At the same time, we believe our
divisional transformation programs continue to deliver
market-leading customer services, while lowering the
cost to serve.
Over the year, substantial work has also continued on
conduct and culture, with work focused on continuing
to strengthen our conduct management across the
Group. Much of the effort this year has been focused
on improving customer outcomes and on our product
reviews, as well as working to ensure we meet customer
and community expectations. We are continuing to
make adjustments and improvements to our business.
In addition, work continues on ensuring that we are
responding to the changing regulatory and industry
landscape.
Sustainability is part of our strategy of seeking to
anticipate and shape the most pressing emerging social
issues where we have the skills and experience to make
a meaningful difference and drive business value. Our
approach makes sustainability part of the way we do
business, embedded in our strategy, values, culture and
processes.
Supporting our customer-focused strategy is a strong
set of company-wide values, which are embedded in
our culture. These are:
• integrity;
• service;
• one team;
• courage; and
• achievement.
In delivering our strategy, we have a set of strategic
priorities that help guide our activities:
Customer Franchise
• Deliver great customer outcomes;
• Create best-in-class service experience;
• Enable channels to work together seamlessly; and
• Maintain strong and differentiated brand portfolio.
Digital transformation
• Build out data infrastructure and capabilities;
• Transform our platforms;
• Strengthen partnerships to efficiently close
capability gaps; and
• Create new digital experiences for customers.
Performance discipline
• Uplift risk management capability;
• Get it right;
• Enhance execution proficiency; and
• Drive structural cost reduction.
Competition
The Group operates in a highly competitive
environment.
We serve the banking, wealth and risk management
needs of customer segments from consumers and
small businesses through to large corporate and
institutional clients. The Group competes with other
financial services providers in every segment and every
product or service. Our competitors include financial
services and advisory companies such as banks (both
domestic and global), investment banks, credit unions,
building societies, mortgage originators, credit card
issuers, brokerage firms, fund and asset management
companies, insurance companies, online financial
services providers, and technology companies large and
small.
Like other financial services providers, our competitive
position across customer segments, products and
geographies is determined by a variety of factors. These
include:
• the quality, range, innovation and pricing of products
and services offered;
• digital and technology solutions;
• customer service quality and convenience;
• the effectiveness of, and access to, distribution
channels;
• brand reputation and preference;
• the types of customers served; and
• the talent and experience of our employees.
382019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Directors’ report
We also operate in an environment where digital
innovation is changing the competitive landscape.
We compete on our ability to offer new products and
services that align to evolving customer preferences.
The competitive nature of the industry means that if
we are not successful in developing or introducing new
products and services, or in responding or adapting to
changes in customer preferences and habits, we could
lose customers to our competitors.
Competition within Australia’s financial system is
evidenced by both the significant number of providers
and the range of products and services available
to customers. In Australia, competition for both
deposits and lending continues to be fierce, both from
established banks as well as new entrants, including
technology firms. Slowing growth in some sectors has
heightened competitive intensity as financial institutions
work to win new customers and retain existing ones.
In our wealth businesses, we expect the broader
competitive landscape to continue to undergo
significant change with ongoing consolidation in life
insurance, increased overseas interest and participation
in superannuation.
In New Zealand, the Group is experiencing strong
competition as banks vie for new customers and seek
to retain existing ones. Competition for deposits and
lending remains intense.
Outlook
1
The Australian economy had a below-trend year with
annual growth to the June quarter 2019 at only 1.4%
which was below population growth of 1.6%.
Growth has been uneven as private spending
contracted over the year while government spending
and exports accounted for all of Australia’s growth.
Weakness in the private sector largely reflects a
contraction in building activity, particularly centred
around residential property, and continuing weakness
in wages which is constraining consumer spending. The
softer Australian growth combined with the slowdown
in the world economy is also impacting business
confidence and investment plans.
Progress in dealing with the shocks to the global
outlook from the trade disputes, particularly between
the US and China, will be important for the outlook for
the global economy and the flow-on effect on business
confidence and investment plans in Australia.
Looking ahead, the Group expects GDP growth to lift
somewhat through the remainder of 2019 and into
2020. This scenario is expected to be supported by
interest rate cuts, the lower Australian dollar, targeted
income tax cuts, and a recovery in housing sentiment.
Nevertheless, GDP growth is likely to remain below
longer term averages (of closer to 2.75%) at 2.3% for
calendar year 2019 and 2.4% for calendar year 2020.
Weakness in wage growth is likely to persist while the
contraction in the residential construction cycle will
extend well into 2020. The Group expects the recent
recovery in house prices, particularly in Sydney and
Melbourne, to extend into 2020, providing some boost
to households who, nevertheless, are likely to remain
cautious on further increasing debt levels.
With the Commonwealth budget expected to return
to surplus in 2019/20, the Commonwealth government
may initiate additional stimulus in 2020 to assist the
recovery as further stimulus from monetary policy
appears to be limited.
With the RBA cash rate having been reduced from 1.5%
to 0.75% over the course of 2019, one more rate cut is
expected in early 2020 to 0.5%. Following that move,
if further stimulus is required, the RBA may adopt
unconventional monetary policies which may include
asset purchases or long term funding for financial
institutions.
Credit growth for the Australian financial system slowed
to 2.7% in the year to September 2019, down from 4.5%
a year earlier. That included a slowdown in housing
credit to 3.1% from 5.4% and business to 3.3% from 3.8%
with personal credit contracting by 4.4% after declining
by 1% a year earlier.
For the year ending 30 September 2020, total system
credit growth is expected to lift to 3%, with housing
credit growth rising to 3.5%. The lift in housing credit
growth is expected to reflect the improving conditions
in major housing markets, particularly following
the more recent rise in lending approvals. Business
credit growth is likely to expand by 3% in the year to
30 September 2020 while other personal credit is
expected to contract by a further 2%.
Economic conditions in New Zealand have also softened
over the year; in part due to the deterioration in the
global back drop which has dampened conditions
in export sectors. Domestic New Zealand conditions
have also softened with sluggish consumer spending
and weak business confidence. Conditions in New
Zealand are likely to remain muted for the remainder
of 2019 followed by an expected improvement in 2020
supported by lower interest rates, some fiscal stimulus,
and the competitive (lower) New Zealand dollar.
The environment for financial services companies is
expected to continue to be impacted by the actions
flowing from the Royal Commission into Misconduct
in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services
Industry that released its final report in February 2019.
The sector will remain focused on implementing the
recommendations of the Royal Commission and other
company specific reviews. At the same time, regulators
have indicated that they will be taking a more active
position in prosecuting cases of misconduct as well
as stepping up supervisory actions. This will likely see
associated costs remain high for the sector in the period
ahead.
In addition, regulators in Australia and New Zealand
have a number of reviews underway, in many areas
including mortgage pricing, remuneration, and capital/
risk weighted asset methodologies across the sector.
Further clarity on these reviews is expected in the year
ahead.
1. All data and opinions under ‘Outlook’ are generated by our internal economists and management.
392019 Westpac Group Annual Report
1
2
3
4
Directors’ report
Westpac Group remains focused on executing our
vision of being one of the world’s great service
companies, with three strategic priorities assisting this
transformation. These are:
• Customer franchise - continuing to build the
Group’s customer base while also increasing the
depth of customer relationships. The Group seeks
to do this via superior service, as measured by NPS,
and by expanding our share of customers that call
us their main financial institution. The priority will
be supported by our strong portfolio of brands and
also recognises that leading in services requires a
high quality, diverse and engaged workforce;
• Digital transformation - utilising technology to
materially improve efficiency and reduce the
Group’s cost to income ratio to below 40% in the
medium term. This will include completing the
modernisation of the Group’s technology platforms,
and migrating more activity to digital that will
assist in the continued restructuring of the Group’s
distribution network and create new experiences for
customers. At the same time we’ve developed some
unique fintech partnerships that will provide new
services and close capability gaps; and
• Performance discipline – continuing to be prudent
in the management of capital, funding and liquidity;
managing returns effectively seeking to achieve a
superior ROE to the peer average and remaining
disciplined and targeted on asset growth. At the
same time the group is focused on improving
its ability to execute on its plans with a focus on
leadership.
In the period ahead, a key focus will be to resolve
outstanding issues, including our response to the
findings of the Royal Commission and our own CGA
self-assessment. At the same time we are looking to
enhance our processes and controls in areas such as
financial crime, end-to-end lending, compliance, and
risk management. As a result, investment across these
areas, is expected to lead to higher costs in 2020.
At the same time, we have already provided for
customer payments and refunds where we may not
have, or have not been able to sufficiently demonstrate
that we have, done the right thing for customers. Our
review of historical practices will continue into 2020
and further provisions may be required. We will also
focus on refunding customers as quickly as practical
where needed.
The low interest rate environment also has an impact
on bank earnings and should interest rates be reduced
further it is likely to place additional pressure on
earnings and returns, as the ability to fully reprice
lending and deposits to account for even lower interest
rates is limited.
Our lending growth is expected to be modest in the
year ahead, partly reflecting the low system growth
but also due to our decision to remain disciplined on
margins and from low mortgage growth. Mortgage
volume declined late in FY19 and are expected to ease
further in the early part of FY20. Growth should then
recover through the year as the resolution of some
process issues gradually sees new applications improve
and outflows slow.
Wealth management income is also expected to
be lower over the year, from our decisions to exit
financial planning, eliminate grandfathered commission
payments and change pricing on our wealth
administration platforms. The impact of regulatory
change may also reduce wealth and insurance income
in the year ahead.
On capital, our current capital raising will further
lift the Group’s CET1 capital ratio and, based on the
current outlook and our capital settings, the Group will
increase its buffer over APRA’s unquestionably strong
benchmark for CET1 capital ratio of over 10.5%.
Given the strength of our customer franchise, and
our balance sheet, we believe we are well placed to
respond to any changes in the operating environment
or regulatory requirements.
Looking ahead, with our strong positioning, disciplined
growth, solid portfolio of businesses, and good
progress on our strategic priorities, Westpac believes
it is well positioned to continue delivering sound
outcomes for shareholders and customers.
Further information on our business strategies
and prospects for future financial years and likely
developments in our operations and the expected
results of operations have not been included in this
report because the Directors believe it would be likely
to result in unreasonable prejudice to us.
f) Risks to our financial performance, position and
our operations
Our financial position, our future financial results,
our operations and the success of our strategy are
subject to a range of risks. These risks are set out and
discussed in Section 2 of this Annual Report under the
section ‘Risk and risk management’, which forms part of
this report (see pages 102 to 120).
402019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Directors’ report
4. Directors’ interests
a) Directors’ interests in securities
The following particulars for each Director are set out in the Remuneration Report in Section 10 of the Directors’
report for the year ended 30 September 2019 and in the tables below:
• their relevant interests in our shares or the shares of any of our related bodies corporate;
• their relevant interests in debentures of, or interests in, any registered managed investment scheme made
available by us or any of our related bodies corporate;
• their rights or options over shares in, debentures of, or interests in, any registered managed investment scheme
made available by us or any of our related bodies corporate; and
• any contracts:
–to which the Director is a party or under which they are entitled to a benefit; and
–that confer a right to call for or deliver shares in, debentures of, or interests in, any registered managed
investment scheme made available by us or any of our related bodies corporate.
Directors’ interests in Westpac and related bodies corporate as at 4 November 2019
Number of Relevant
Interests in Westpac
Ordinary Shares
Number of Westpac
Share Rights
Westpac Banking Corporation
Current Directors
Lindsay Maxsted23,602-
Brian Hartzer151,478
1
636,540
2
Nerida Caesar13,583-
Ewen Crouch78,450
3
-
Alison Deans14,392-
Craig Dunn8,869-
Anita Fung--
Steven Harker10,365
Peter Marriott20,870-
Peter Nash8,020-
Margaret Seale21,719
4
Former Directors
Peter Hawkins15,880
5
-
1. Brian Hartzer’s interest in Westpac ordinary shares includes 20,933 restricted shares held under the CEO Restricted Share Plan.
2. Share rights issued under the CEO Long Term Variable Plan.
3. Ewen Crouch and his related bodies corporate also hold relevant interests in 250 Westpac Capital Notes 2.
4. Margaret Seale and her related bodies corporate also hold relevant interests in 3,220 Westpac Capital Notes 2.
5. Figure displayed is as at Peter Hawkins’s retirement date of 12 December 2018, at which point Peter Hawkins and his related bodies
corporate also held relevant interests in 850 Capital Notes 3, 882 Westpac Capital Notes 4 and 1,370 Westpac Capital Notes 5.
Note: Certain subsidiaries of Westpac offer a range of registered schemes. The Directors from time to time invest in these schemes and are
required to provide a statement to the ASX when any of their interests in these schemes change. ASIC has exempted each Director from
the obligation to notify the ASX of a relevant interest in a security that is an interest in BT Cash Management Trust (ARSN 087 531 539),
BT Premium Cash Fund (ARSN 089 299 730), Westpac Cash Management Trust (ARSN 088 187 928) or Advance Cash Multi-Blend Fund
(ARSN 094 113 050).
412019 Westpac Group Annual Report
1
2
3
4
Directors’ report
b) Indemnities and insurance
Under the Westpac Constitution, unless prohibited
by statute, we indemnify each of the Directors and
Company Secretaries of Westpac and of each of
our related bodies corporate (except related bodies
corporate listed on a recognised stock exchange),
each employee of Westpac or our subsidiaries (except
subsidiaries listed on a recognised stock exchange),
and each person acting as a responsible manager
under an Australian Financial Services Licence of any
of Westpac’s wholly-owned subsidiaries against every
liability (other than a liability for legal costs) incurred by
each such person in their capacity as director, company
secretary, employee or responsible manager, as the
case may be; and all legal costs incurred in defending or
resisting (or otherwise in connection with) proceedings,
whether civil or criminal or of an administrative or
investigatory nature, in which the person becomes
involved because of that capacity.
Each of the Directors named in this Directors’ report
and each of the Company Secretaries of Westpac has
the benefit of this indemnity.
Consistent with shareholder approval at the 2000
Annual General Meeting, Westpac has entered into
a Deed of Access and Indemnity with each of the
Directors, which includes indemnification in identical
terms to that provided in the Westpac Constitution.
Westpac also executed a deed poll in September 2009
providing indemnification equivalent to that provided
under the Westpac Constitution to individuals acting as:
• statutory officers (other than as a director) of
Westpac;
• directors and other statutory officers of wholly-
owned subsidiaries of Westpac; and
• directors and statutory officers of other nominated
companies as approved by Westpac in accordance
with the terms of the deed poll and Westpac’s
Contractual Indemnity Policy.
Some employees of Westpac’s related bodies corporate
and responsible managers of Westpac and its related
bodies corporate are also currently covered by a deed
poll that was executed in November 2004, which is on
similar terms to the September 2009 deed poll.
The Westpac Constitution also permits us, to the extent
permitted by law, to pay or agree to pay premiums for
contracts insuring any person who is or has been a
Director or Company Secretary of Westpac or any of
its related bodies corporate against liability incurred by
that person in that capacity, including a liability for legal
costs, unless:
• we are forbidden by statute to pay or agree to pay
the premium; or
• the contract would, if we paid the premium, be
made void by statute.
Under the September 2009 deed poll, Westpac also
agrees to provide directors’ and officers’ liability
insurance to Directors of Westpac and Directors of
Westpac’s wholly-owned subsidiaries.
For the year ended 30 September 2019, the Group has
insurance cover which, in certain circumstances, will
provide reimbursement for amounts which we have to
pay under the indemnities set out above. That cover
is subject to the terms and conditions of the relevant
insurance, including but not limited to the limit of
indemnity provided by the insurance. The insurance
policies prohibit disclosure of the premium payable and
the nature of the liabilities covered.
c) Share rights outstanding
As at the date of this report there are 4,225,250 share
rights outstanding in relation to Westpac ordinary
shares. The latest dates for exercise of the share rights
range between 1 October 2020 and 1 July 2034.
Holders of outstanding share rights in relation to
Westpac ordinary shares do not have any rights under
the share rights to participate in any share issue or
interest of Westpac or any other body corporate.
d) Proceedings on behalf of Westpac
No application has been made and no proceedings
have been brought or intervened in, on behalf of
Westpac under section 237 of the Corporations Act.
422019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Directors’ report
5. Environmental disclosure
As part of our 2019 Sustainability Strategy, we have set
targets for our environmental performance to 2020.
The Westpac Group’s environmental framework starts
with ‘Our Principles for Doing Business’, which outline
our broad environmental principles. This framework
includes:
• our Westpac Group Environment Policy, which has
been in place since 1992;
• our Sustainability Risk Management Framework;
• our Climate Change Position Statement and 2020
Action Plan;
• our Responsible Sourcing Code of Conduct; and
• public reporting of our environmental performance.
We also participate in a number of voluntary initiatives
including the Dow Jones Sustainability Index (#9
in global banking group and above our Australian
peers), CDP
1
, the Equator Principles, the Principles for
Responsible Banking, the Principles for Responsible
Investment and the United Nations Global Compact.
The National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting Act
2007 (Cth) (NGER) came into effect in July 2008. The
Group reports on greenhouse gas emissions, energy
consumption and production under the NGER for the
period 1 July through 30 June each year.
Our operations are not subject to any other significant
environmental regulation under any law of the
Commonwealth of Australia or of any state or territory
of Australia. We may, however, become subject to
environmental regulation as a result of our lending
activities in the ordinary course of business and we
have policies in place to ensure that this potential risk is
addressed as part of our normal processes.
We have not incurred any liability (including for
rectification costs) under any environmental legislation.
Westpac has reported its performance against the
recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-
related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) in Section 2 of
this Annual Report under the sections titled ‘Risk and
risk management – climate change risk’ (see pages
118 to 120); and ‘Climate-related financial disclosures
(see page 127). Further information about Westpac’s
sustainability performance and approach is also
included in Section 2 of this Annual Report under
the sections ‘Risk and Risk Management’ (see pages
102 to 120) and ‘Westpac’s approach to sustainability’
(see pages 121 to 131).
Additional information about our environmental
performance, including information on our climate
change approach, details of our greenhouse gas
emissions profile and environmental footprint, and
progress against our environmental targets and carbon
neutral program are available on our website at
www.westpac.com.au/sustainability.
6. Human rights supply chain disclosure
Westpac’s overall approach to human rights is set out in
our Westpac Group Human Rights Position Statement,
and this references our Responsible Sourcing Code
of Conduct as the primary framework for managing
human rights in our supply chain.
The Group is subject to the United Kingdom’s
Transparency in Supply Chains provisions under the
Modern Slavery Act 2015, which came into effect in
March 2015. Westpac releases an annual statement
each year for the period ended 30 September to
disclose the steps taken during the year to help prevent
modern slavery from occurring within the Group’s
operations and supply chain.
The Group is subject to the Commonwealth of
Australia’s Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Cth), with the first
reporting year being 2020 and the first report being
due six months from the end of 30 September 2020.
7. Rounding of amounts
Westpac is an entity to which ASIC Corporations
Instrument 2016/191 dated 24 March 2016, relating
to the rounding of amounts in directors’ reports and
financial reports, applies. Pursuant to this Instrument,
amounts in this Directors’ report and the accompanying
financial report have been rounded to the nearest
million dollars, unless indicated to the contrary.
8. Political engagement
In line with Westpac policy, no cash donations were
made to political parties during the financial year ended
30 September 2019.
In Australia, political expenditure for the financial year
ended 30 September 2019 was $166,650. This relates
to payment for participation in legitimate political
activities where they were assessed to be of direct
business relevance to Westpac. Such activities include
business observer programs attached to annual party
conferences, policy dialogue forums and other political
functions, such as speeches and events with industry
participants.
In New Zealand, political expenditure for the financial
year ended 30 September 2019 was NZD$20,170.
1. Formerly known as the Carbon Disclosure Project.
432019 Westpac Group Annual Report
1
2
3
4
Directors’ report
9. Directors’ meetings
Each Director attended the following meetings of the Board and Committees of the Board during the financial year
ended 30 September 2019:
NotesBoard
Audit
Committee
Risk &
Compliance
Committee
Nominations
Committee
Remuneration
Committee
Technology
Committee
Number of meetings
held during the year
Director
ABABABABABAB
Lindsay Maxsted11111665544n/an/an/an/a
Brian Hartzer21111n/an/an/an/an/an/an/an/a44
Nerida Caesar31111n/an/a55n/an/an/an/a44
Ewen Crouch4111144554466n/an/a
Alison Deans51111n/an/a55446644
Craig Dunn61111n/an/a554466n/an/a
Anita Fung71111n/an/a55n/an/an/an/an/an/a
Steven Harker877n/an/a33n/an/an/an/an/an/a
Peter Hawkins9332211n/an/an/an/a11
Peter Marriott101111665544n/an/a44
Peter Nash1111116655n/an/an/an/an/an/a
Margaret Seale1277n/an/a33n/an/an/an/an/an/a
This table shows membership of standing Committees of the Board. From time to time the Board may form other
committees or request Directors to undertake specific extra duties.
A – Meetings eligible to attend as a member B – Meetings attended as a member
Unless otherwise stated, each Director has been a member, or the Chairman, of the relevant Committee for the
whole of the period from 1 October 2018.
1. Chairman of the Board Nominations Committee. Member of the Board Audit Committee and the Board Risk & Compliance Committee.
2. Member of the Board Technology Committee.
3. Member of the Board Risk & Compliance Committee and Board Technology Committee.
4. Chairman of the Board Risk & Compliance Committee. Member of the Board Nominations Committee and the Board Remuneration
Committee, and from 1 January 2019, a member of the Board Audit Committee.
5. Chairman of the Board Technology Committee. Member of the Board Nominations Committee, Board Remuneration Committee and
Board Risk & Compliance Committee.
6. Chairman of the Board Remuneration Committee. Member of the Board Risk & Compliance Committee and the Board Nominations
Committee.
7. Member of the Board Risk & Compliance Committee.
8. Steven Harker was appointed as a Director and member of the Board Risk & Compliance Committee on 1 March 2019.
9. Peter Hawkins retired from the Board and its Committees on 12 December 2018.
10. Chairman of the Board Audit Committee. Member of the Board Nominations Committee, Board Risk & Compliance Committee and the
Board Technology Committee.
11. Member of the Board Audit Committee and Board Risk & Compliance Committee.
12. Margaret Seale was appointed as a Director and member of the Board Risk & Compliance Committee on 1 March 2019.
442019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Directors’ report
Directors’ report
10. Remuneration Report
Introduction from the Chairman of the Board Remuneration Committee
2019 was
a year of reflection
for the Company
and the Board
Craig Dunn, Chairman
Board Remuneration Committee
Dear shareholders,
On behalf of the Board, I am pleased to present
Westpac’s 2019 Remuneration Report.
2019 Group performance
As outlined in the Chairman’s report and the CEO’s
annual letter, 2019 has been another challenging period
for financial services companies, including Westpac.
Examples of poor behaviour affecting customers,
shortcomings in the management of non-financial
risks and poor risk cultures have been at the heart of
challenges faced by the industry.
These issues have been accompanied by slowing
economic activity, further falls in interest rates,
a decline in house prices and weak business and
consumer confidence. These operating conditions have
contributed to more cautious demand for lending, a
decline in deposit growth and intense competition as
more lenders target a smaller pool of new lending.
With this backdrop, Westpac reported cash earnings of
$6,849 million in 2019, a reduction of 15% compared to
the prior year. Our performance in 2019 was impacted
by estimated customer refunds, payments, associated
costs, and litigation, as well as costs incurred with the
restructuring of the Wealth business. Excluding these
items, cash earnings in 2019 were $7,979 million, down
4% relative to 2018.
While earnings were lower, our common equity tier 1
ratio was 10.67% at 30 September 2019 and our liquidity
ratios were well above regulatory minimums. Asset
quality has remained sound and the overall level of
stressed assets remained at low levels over the year.
Recognising that much work has commenced on
improving our approach to non-financial risks, progress
in resolving risk and compliance matters has fallen short
of our expectations. Resolution of these matters and
continued investment in non-financial risk management
remain a focus.
Through the year we have continued to improve service
for customers, particularly via new digital self-serve
options and an enhanced approach to capturing
and responding to complaints. Investments in our
technology infrastructure have improved the stability
and speed of our systems and improved availability for
customers.
2019 remuneration outcomes
Westpac’s short term variable reward (STVR) is
designed to ensure a significant portion of remuneration
is variable, at-risk and linked to the delivery of agreed
plan targets for financial and non-financial measures.
The STVR outcome can range from 0% to 100%
depending on performance relative to targets agreed
at the beginning of the year, or exceed 100% when
exceptional performance is achieved.
The targets for STVR sign-post those areas of focus
that the Board regards as most critical for management
and which encourage the achievement of stretch
performance while operating within appropriate risk
settings. Long term variable reward (LTVR) is designed
to further align the interests of executives with those
of shareholders by rewarding the delivery of sustained
Group performance over the long term.
Key remuneration outcomes for 2019 include:
• The CEO’s STVR award was zero;
• The average 2019 STVR outcome for Group
Executives was 56% of the target opportunity, down
from 87% in 2018;
• The 2016 LTVR lapsed in full;
• The 2020 total target remuneration has been
reduced by 23% and 12.5% for the CEO and Group
Executives, respectively reflecting changes made to
LTVR; and
• Board fees were reduced by 20% as a one-off
measure.
Further detail regarding the key remuneration outcomes
for the CEO, Group Executives and Non-executive
Directors is provided on the following page, and in
sections 3, 6 and 7 of the Remuneration Report.
1
2
3
4
452019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Directors’ report
Chief
Executive
Officer
• The CEO recommended to the Board that he forego his STVR for this year. The Board separately
considered the matter and determined that a zero STVR outcome for 2019 for the CEO was
appropriate to reflect accountability for poor non-financial risk and financial outcomes, as well as
some poor customer outcomes, including those highlighted at the Royal Commission.
• The 2016 LTVR lapsed in full because the relative TSR and cash EPS performance hurdles were not
achieved. The CEO has not received a share-based payment under the LTVR for four consecutive
years, equating to $15.96 million worth of lapsed performance share rights over that period. This
result is aligned with shareholder outcomes over the period.
• In 2019, the CEO received $2.69 million in fixed remuneration and $1.33 million in deferred STVR
awarded in prior years that vested during the year, equalling $4.02 million in total realised
remuneration (i.e. take-home pay). This outcome is 33% of the maximum remuneration he could
have received for the year.
• For 2020, the CEO’s total target remuneration (comprising fixed remuneration, target STVR and
LTVR opportunity at face value) has been reduced by 23% as a result of changes made to LTVR,
as outlined below.
• The CEO has not received a total target remuneration increase since his appointment in 2015.
Group
Executives
• Group Executives received between 0% and 83% of their 2019 STVR target opportunity. The average
2019 STVR outcome for Group Executives was 56% of the target opportunity, down from 87% in 2018.
• The 2019 STVR scorecard outcome for non-financial risk measures was reduced to zero for Group
Executives. In addition, downward remuneration adjustments were applied to two Group Executives
and two former Group Executives in response to material risk and compliance matters that impacted
the Group, in some instances reducing 2019 STVR outcomes to zero. Many of these adjustments
related to events from prior periods which have continued to develop and, in some cases, for which
material remediation costs were accounted for in 2019.
• The Board exercised its discretion to apply downward adjustments to a portion of deferred STVR
awarded in prior years for two former Group Executives.
• The 2016 LTVR lapsed in full because the relative TSR and cash EPS performance hurdles were
not achieved.
• For 2020, the total target remuneration for Group Executives has been reduced by 12.5%, as a result
of changes made to LTVR.
• Given the above remuneration adjustments to current year and deferred STVR, together with changes
made to the LTVR from 2020, the Board determined that further adjustments to the quantum of
2020 LTVR were not required.
• David McLean (Chief Executive Officer, Westpac New Zealand) and Gary Thursby (Chief Operating
Officer) received total target remuneration increases in 2019 of 10.3% and 10.4% respectively to align
their remuneration with the market. David Lindberg received a total target remuneration increase
in 2019 of 6% given the increased size and scale of his role on appointment as the Group Executive,
Consumer. No other Group Executives received total target remuneration increases during 2019.
• David Stephen (Chief Risk Officer) and Craig Bright (Chief Information Officer) were appointed as
Group Executives in 2019. To attract the best international talent, the Board approved remuneration
packages which are higher than those of their predecessors. The Board also approved buyout awards
to compensate these executives for awards forfeited on resignation from their previous employer.
Non-
executive
Directors
• The Chairman and other Non-executive Director base fees for 2019 were reduced by 20% as a one-
off measure, which equated to a $162,000 reduction for the Chairman. The reduction was applied
to all current Non-executive Directors in recognition of our collective accountability as the Board
of Westpac for customer outcomes highlighted by the Royal Commission, shareholder sentiment
leading to the first strike at the 2018 Annual General Meeting and significant non-financial risk
matters.
All
employees
• The 2019 Group variable reward pool for all employees was reduced by $126 million from 2018 to
align with Group performance.
• In addition to the remuneration adjustments for Group Executives, downward remuneration
adjustments were approved for 13 General Managers in response to material risk and compliance
matters impacting the Group, ranging from 10% to 100%.
• The Group managed 1,134 employee conduct matters in Australia in 2019, of which 163 employees
exited the business and 545 employees were subject to formal disciplinary outcomes. A range of
remuneration consequences were also applied for these matters, including ineligibility for STVR and
remuneration adjustments to STVR.
462019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Directors’ report
First strike
Westpac received a first strike at the 2018 Annual
General Meeting, with 64% of votes cast against the
adoption of the 2018 Remuneration Report. This was a
disappointing outcome.
In 2019, we significantly increased our engagement
across different shareholder and shareholder advisory
groups to better understand their concerns. In addition
to ongoing meetings with shareholder advisory groups
and feedback from shareholders in the normal course,
we had individual and group meetings with many of our
institutional shareholders and roundtable meetings with
representative retail shareholders co-facilitated with the
Australian Shareholders’ Association.
It is clear that our executive remuneration outcomes
in 2018 were not in line with shareholder expectations.
Based on the feedback from the 2018 Annual General
Meeting and our more extensive consultations, the key
concerns that led to the first strike included:
(1) 2018 STVR outcomes were not considered
reflective of performance. Shareholders felt that
the scorecard results did not reflect performance in
some areas, in particular non-financial risk, and the
Board did not apply enough downward discretion to
the outcomes.
(2) Remuneration was considered too high,
particularly for the CEO. LTVR granted to the CEO
and Group Executives in 2018 was viewed as high
relative to that of peers, which was partially driven
by the use of fair value to determine the number of
performance share rights to grant for LTVR.
(3) There was insufficient transparency in our
communication with shareholders. Shareholders
believed that further information was required to
explain how STVR outcomes were determined.
The Board and management value these insights and
appreciate your feedback and willingness to engage
constructively.
Changes to remuneration
We spent significant time in 2019 reflecting on your
feedback.
We completed a comprehensive review of executive
remuneration including the remuneration strategy,
frameworks, governance, decision-making processes,
and our approach to communication.
A key objective of our review was to identify
opportunities for improvement and to develop
balanced solutions that consider the expectations of
shareholders, shareholder advisory groups, regulators,
customers and the broader community.
As a result, we have:
• Changed the LTVR allocation approach from 2020.
The number of performance share rights granted to
executives is now determined by the face value of
shares at the grant date, instead of the fair value. We
believe this approach improves transparency and is
in line with changes in market practice.
• Reduced total target and maximum remuneration
for executives from 2020. The Board reduced the
face value of 2020 LTVR opportunities by 43% for
the CEO and 23% to 25% for Group Executives. As
a result, the 2020 total target remuneration has
been reduced by 23% for the CEO and 12.5% for
Group Executives. This means the CEO’s total target
remuneration becomes comparable to that of other
Australian major bank CEOs.
Fixed remuneration
STVR
LTVR (face value)
CEO target remuneration package ($'000)
$2,686
$2,686
$2,686
$2,686
$6,320
$3,585
FY19
FY20
• Reduced fees paid to Non-executive Directors
for 2019. The Chairman and other current
Non-executive Director base fees for 2019 were
reduced by 20% as a one-off measure to recognise
collective accountability as the Board of Westpac
for customer outcomes highlighted by the Royal
Commission, shareholder sentiment leading to the
first strike at the 2018 Annual General Meeting and
significant non-financial risk matters.
• Updated the CEO’s 2019 STVR scorecard.
The balanced scorecard was updated to place a
greater emphasis on non-financial risk management
and customer outcomes.
• Improved our remuneration governance and
decision-making frameworks. We further improved
our approach to the assessment of material risk and
compliance matters and the flow of information
between Board Committees including to support
the Board in determining possible remuneration
adjustments.
• Enhanced our remuneration adjustment guidelines
to strengthen consequence management.
The guidelines build on existing policies and
practices to provide greater clarity and consistency
in the management of employee conduct and the
application of remuneration consequences.
• Introduced clawback as an additional
remuneration adjustment tool. Clawback has been
introduced to enable the Board to recover deferred
variable remuneration after it has vested (to the
extent legally permissible) in circumstances such
as serious misconduct or other conduct that may
have a serious adverse impact on Westpac or its
reputation, customers or people which has resulted
in, or would justify, termination of employment or
where otherwise required by law. Clawback will
apply to variable remuneration awarded in respect
of performance periods commencing on or after
1 October 2019 where conduct warranting clawback
occurs after this date.
• Improved disclosure in the Remuneration Report.
The Remuneration Report provides greater
transparency around the rationale for remuneration
decisions, seeks to clearly demonstrate the link
between performance and remuneration and
provides further detail in relation to Westpac’s
minimum shareholding requirement in section 5.
1
2
3
4
472019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Directors’ report
Other changes for 2020
In addition, the Board has selected relative TSR as
the performance hurdle for the 2020 LTVR plan
as it believes this measure best aligns executive
remuneration outcomes with long-term shareholder
value creation. In recent years, cash ROE has been
used as a LTVR performance hurdle in conjunction
with relative TSR. The Board considers that setting
an absolute cash ROE range over a three year period
has become increasingly difficult in light of current
uncertainties surrounding future regulatory capital
requirements and interest rates, which are at historically
low levels. The Board will review the 2021 LTVR
plan following the release of APRA’s final regulatory
framework for remuneration.
Regulatory developments
APRA is currently consulting on changes to the
regulatory framework for remuneration. The Board
recently provided a submission to APRA on the
proposed changes which sets out Westpac’s overall
support for a stronger, clearer and more consistent
set of requirements. Our submission also recommends
alternatives for consideration by the regulator in relation
to some material aspects of the draft changes, including
in relation to the proposed maximum weighting of
financial performance measures used to determine
variable remuneration. If enacted, some of the proposed
changes would require substantial amendment to
our remuneration arrangements for executives and
employees. The Board will continue to review the
remuneration design in 2020 following the release of
APRA’s final regulatory framework.
On behalf of the Board, I invite you to read our
Remuneration Report and welcome your feedback.
Craig Dunn, Chairman
Board Remuneration Committee
482019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Directors’ report
In this Report
1. Key Management Personnel 49
2. Summary of the 2019 executive reward framework 50
3. 2019 remuneration outcomes and alignment to performance 52
4. Further detail on the executive variable reward structure 59
5. Remuneration governance 62
6. Non-executive Director remuneration 64
7. Statutory remuneration details 66
1
2
3
4
492019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Directors’ report
1. David Lindberg was the Chief Executive, Business Bank until 1 April 2019 when he was appointed as the Chief Executive, Consumer.
2. Gary Thursby’s role and title changed from Group Executive, Strategy & Enterprise Services to Chief Operating Officer on 1 April 2019.
3. Alastair Welsh was the General Manager, Commercial Banking until 1 April 2019 when he was appointed as the Acting Chief Executive,
Business.
1. Key Management Personnel
The remuneration of Key Management Personnel (KMP) for the Group is disclosed in the Report. In 2019, KMP
comprised the CEO, Group Executives and Non-executive Directors as set out in the table below. KMP is defined as
those persons having authority and responsibility for planning, directing and controlling the activities of an entity,
directly or indirectly, including any director (whether executive or otherwise) of that entity.
NamePositionTerm as KMP
Managing Director & Chief Executive Officer
Brian HartzerManaging Director & Chief Executive OfficerFull Year
Current Group Executives
Craig BrightChief Information OfficerCommenced in KMP role on 4 December 2018
Lyn CobleyChief Executive, Westpac Institutional BankFull Year
Peter KingChief Financial OfficerFull Year
Rebecca LimGroup Executive, Legal & SecretariatFull Year
David Lindberg
1
Chief Executive, ConsumerFull Year
Carolyn McCannGroup Executive, Customer & Corporate RelationsFull Year
David McLeanChief Executive Officer, Westpac New ZealandFull Year
Christine ParkerGroup Executive, Human ResourcesFull Year
David StephenChief Risk OfficerFull Year
Gary Thursby
2
Chief Operating OfficerFull Year
Alastair Welsh
3
Acting Chief Executive, BusinessCommenced in KMP role on 1 April 2019
Former Group Executives
Brad CooperChief Executive Officer, BT Financial GroupCeased in KMP role on 1 April 2019
Dave CurranChief Information OfficerCeased in KMP role on 4 December 2018
George FrazisChief Executive, Consumer BankCeased in KMP role on 1 April 2019
Current Non-executive Directors
Lindsay Maxsted ChairmanFull Year
Nerida CaesarDirectorFull Year
Ewen CrouchDirectorFull Year
Alison DeansDirectorFull Year
Craig DunnDirector Full Year
Anita Fung DirectorFull Year
Steven HarkerDirectorCommenced in KMP role on 1 March 2019
Peter MarriottDirectorFull Year
Peter NashDirectorFull Year
Margaret SealeDirectorCommenced in KMP role on 1 March 2019
Former Non-executive Director
Peter HawkinsDirectorRetired on 12 December 2018 following the
completion of the 2018 Annual General Meeting
502019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Directors’ report
2. Summary of the 2019 executive reward framework
The delivery of our vision and strategy is supported by our remuneration strategy, principles and frameworks.
Westpac’s vision and strategy
Westpac’s vision is to be one of the world’s great service companies, helping our customers, communities and people to
prosper and grow. Our strategy seeks to deliver on our vision by building deep and enduring customer relationships, being a
leader in the community, being a place where the best people want to work and, in so doing, delivering sustainable returns for
shareholders.
Remuneration strategy
Westpac’s remuneration strategy is designed to attract and retain talented employees by rewarding them for achieving high
performance and delivering superior long-term results for our customers and shareholders, while adhering to sound risk
management and governance principles.
Remuneration principles
The remuneration strategy is underpinned by the following principles:
• Align remuneration with customer and shareholder interests.
• Support an appropriate risk culture and employee conduct.
• Differentiate pay for behaviour and performance in line with our vision and strategy.
• Provide market competitive and fair remuneration.
• Enable recruitment and retention of talented employees.
• Provide the ability to risk-adjust remuneration.
• Be simple, flexible and transparent.
Executive reward components
Fixed remunerationSTVRLTVR
Purpose
Attract and retain high quality executives
through market competitive and fair
remuneration.
Ensure a portion of remuneration is
variable, at-risk and linked to the delivery
of agreed plan targets for financial and
non-financial measures that support
Westpac’s strategic priorities. The STVR
outcome can range from 0% to 100% of
target depending on performance relative
to targets agreed at the beginning of the
year, or exceed 100% (up to a maximum
of 150% of target) when exceptional
performance is achieved.
Align executive accountability and
remuneration with the long-term interests
of shareholders by rewarding the delivery
of sustained Group performance over the
long-term.
Delivery
Comprises cash salary, salary sacrificed
items and superannuation contributions.
Awarded in cash (50%) and restricted
shares
1
(50%) based on an assessment
of performance over the preceding year.
Restricted shares vest in equal portions
after one and two years following
grant subject to continued service and
adjustment.
Awarded in performance share rights
which vest after four years subject to the
achievement of relative TSR and cash ROE
performance hurdles, continued service and
adjustment.
Alignment to performance
Set with reference to market benchmarks
in the financial services industry in
Australia and globally as well as the size,
responsibilities and complexity of the
role, and the skills and experience of the
executive.
Individual performance impacts fixed
remuneration adjustments.
Performance is assessed using a balanced
scorecard comprising:
• financial and non-financial measures
linked to Westpac’s key strategic
priorities; and
• a modifier to support the adjustment of
the outcome, upwards or downwards
(including to zero), for behaviour,
risk and reputation matters, people
management matters, and any other
matters as determined by the Board.
Performance is assessed against:
• Relative TSR
2
(50%) which is a
comparative measure of Westpac’s
performance relative to peers (measured
over four years); and
• Cash ROE
3
(50%) which aims to reward
the achievement of returns above
the cost of capital while generating
shareholder value (measured over a
three year period with an additional one
year holding lock).
Alignment to shareholders
Minimum shareholding requirements
equivalent to five times annual fixed
remuneration excluding superannuation
for the CEO and $1.2 million for Group
Executives. These requirements must be
satisfied within five years of appointment
as the CEO or as a Group Executive.
Half of the STVR award is deferred into
equity for a period of up to two years to
support alignment with shareholders over
the medium term.
The LTVR is fully delivered in equity and the
relative TSR and cash ROE performance
hurdles are aligned to long-term
shareholder returns and value creation.
1. The Group Executive outside Australia receives deferred STVR as unhurdled share rights.
2. For the 2020 LTVR plan, the performance hurdle will be relative TSR.
3. Cash ROE is return on equity on a cash earnings basis. Cash earnings are not prepared in accordance with AAS and have not been
subject to audit. Refer to Note 2 to the Financial Statements for a description of cash earnings.
1
2
3
4
512019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Directors’ report
2.1. Risk
Westpac’s remuneration arrangements are designed and managed to support effective risk management, the
generation of appropriate risk-based returns and the risk profile associated with our businesses which incorporate
products with varying complexity and maturity profiles.
• Remuneration outcomes: The performance of the Group and each division is reviewed and measured with
reference to how risk is managed in line with Westpac’s Risk Appetite Statement and the results of this
review and measurement influence remuneration outcomes. The key risks that are considered include capital,
credit, market, equity, liquidity, insurance, risk culture, reputation and sustainability, conduct, operational
and compliance risk and financial crime. In addition, STVR outcomes are influenced by relevant risk-related
matters through the Board’s application of the scorecard modifier, which is partly informed by individual risk
assessments for the CEO and each Group Executive.
• Variable reward pool: Each year, the Board determines the size of the variable reward pool which funds
outcomes across the Group. This is based on the Group’s performance for the year and an assessment of how
profit should be shared between shareholders and employees while retaining sufficient capital for growth. The
Group variable reward pool reflects financial performance including financial risk outcomes. A broad range
of financial and non-financial risk measures and customer outcomes may also be taken into account when
allocating the Group variable reward pool.
• Mandatory risk and compliance requirements: Individuals are only eligible to receive a fixed remuneration
adjustment, STVR and LTVR where an individual has satisfied minimum requirement gates which require that
behaviours are in line with Westpac’s Values and Code of Conduct and that the individual has met the risk and
compliance requirements for their role and business.
• Remuneration adjustments for prior period matters: The Board may adjust all forms of unvested deferred
variable reward downward, including to zero, for matters arising in a prior period if circumstances or information
come to light which mean that in the Board’s view all or part of the award was not appropriate. Having decided
that a downward adjustment is appropriate and determined the amount of any adjustment, typically the Board
will first apply that adjustment against the STVR for the current performance period. In instances where an
adjustment to current year STVR is insufficient or unavailable, the Board may apply the adjustment to unvested
deferred variable reward. Clawback provides an additional mechanism to recover vested deferred variable
reward in certain limited circumstances for awards made in respect of performance periods commencing on
or after 1 October 2019. It is the Board’s current intention that clawback will only be considered for relevant
conduct that occurred on or after 1 October 2019.
2.2. 2019 remuneration mix
1
34% Fix ed
remunerati on
17% STVR
(cash component)
17% STVR
(deferred
component)
32% LTVR
Chief Executive Officer and Group Executives
(excluding control function Group Executives)
40% Fix ed
remunerati on
15% STVR
(cash component)
15% STVR
(deferred
component)
30% LTVR
Control fu ncti on G roup Executives²
1. Based on a fair value methodology for LTVR.
2. Includes the Chief Risk Officer, the Group Executive, Legal & Secretariat, the Group Executive, Customer & Corporate Relations and the
Chief Financial Officer.
2.3. Timeline of potential remuneration
+ 1 y ear holding lock
20202021202220232019
Date eli gible for vesting
Date granted
Date paid
Cash STVR award (50%)
Fixed remuneration
LTVR award s ubject to cash ROE performance (50%) – measured o ver 3 y ears
LTVR award s ubject to r elati ve T SR performance ( 50%) – measure d o ver 4 years
Deferred STVR award (25%)
Deferred STVR award (25%)
522019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Directors’ report
3. 2019 remuneration outcomes and alignment to performance
3.1. Snapshot of 2019 remuneration outcomes
Short
term
variable
reward
The assessment of performance against the CEO’s 2019 scorecard focus areas resulted in an outcome
of 60% of target (40% of maximum) reflecting Group performance. This includes a zero outcome for
non-financial risk measures in the scorecard.
Notwithstanding this assessment, the CEO recommended to the Board that he forego his STVR for this
year. The Board separately considered the matter and determined that a zero STVR outcome for 2019
was appropriate to reflect accountability for poor non-financial risk and financial outcomes, as well
as some poor customer outcomes, including those highlighted at the Royal Commission. The Board
adjusted the CEO’s STVR award through the modifier, as outlined in section 3.5.
Westpac’s strategic priorities are cascaded from the CEO to Group Executives in combination with
other relevant divisional or functional measures. STVR outcomes for Group Executives ranged from 0%
to 83% of their 2019 STVR target opportunity.
The 2019 scorecard outcome for non-financial risk measures was also reduced to zero for Group
Executives. In addition, downward remuneration adjustments were applied to two Group Executives
and two former Group Executives in response to material risk and compliance matters impacting the
Group, in some instances reducing 2019 STVR outcomes to zero.
50% of the 2019 STVR awards remain subject to continued service and adjustment over a two year
period.
In addition, the Board exercised its discretion to apply downward adjustments to a portion of deferred
STVR awarded in prior years for two former Group Executives.
Long
term
variable
reward
The relative TSR and cash EPS
1
performance hurdles for the 2016 LTVR were not met and therefore
no LTVR vested during 2019. The Board considered that this outcome was appropriate given the
Group’s performance over the relevant period. This is the fourth consecutive year where LTVR has
not vested.
The table below shows the vesting outcome for the 2016 LTVR award to the CEO and Group
Executives that reached the end of its performance period in 2019.
Performance range
Performance
hurdle
Performance
start dateTest dateThresholdMaximumOutcome % Vested% Lapsed
TSR
50% of
award
1-Oct-151-Oct-19
Equal to
composite
TSR index
Exceeds
composite
TSR index by
21.55 (i.e. 5%
CAGR
2
)
Westpac:
14.508
Index:
17.549
0100
EPS
50% of
award
1-Oct-151-Oct-18
3
4.0% CAGR6.0% CAGR(1.6%) CAGR0100
1. Cash EPS is cash earnings per share. Cash earnings are not prepared in accordance with AAS and have not been subject to audit. Refer
to Note 2 to the Financial Statements for a description of cash earnings.
2. Compound annual growth rate.
3. The cash EPS hurdled performance share rights reached the end of their performance period on 30 September 2018 and were subject
to an additional one year holding lock through to 30 September 2019.
3.2. Group performance
The table below summarises the key performance indicators for the Group and variable reward outcomes over the
last five years.
Years ended 30 September
20192018201720162015
CEO STVR award (% of target)0%77.50%111%97%108%
Average Group Executive STVR (% of target)56%87%109%95%106%
LTVR award (% vested)0%0%0%0%36%
Cash earnings
1
($m) 6,849 8,0658,0627,8227,820
Statutory earnings ($m) 6,784 8,0957,9907,4458,012
Economic profit
2
($m)1,6193,4443,7743,7744,418
Cash ROE10.75%13.00%13.77%13.99%15.84%
TSR – three years15.33%8.27%11.79%15.24%62.30%
TSR – five years14.58%25.67%81.32%100.72%92.78%
Dividends per Westpac share (cents)174188188188187
Cash earnings per Westpac share$1.98$2.36$2.40$2.35$2.48
Share price – high$30.05$33.68$35.39$33.74$40.07
Share price – low$23.30$27.24$28.92$27.57$29.10
Share price – close$29.64$27.93$31.92$29.51$29.70
1. Cash earnings are not prepared in accordance with AAS and have not been subject to audit. Refer to Note 2 to the Financial Statements
for a description of cash earnings.
2. Economic profit is derived from cash earnings.
1
2
3
4
532019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Directors’ report
Return on equity and LTVR vesting (2015 to 2019)
10%
0%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
100%
90%
80%
5%
6%
7%
8%
9%
10%
11%
12%
13%
14%
15%
16%
17%
LTVR award
Return on equity (%)
2015
Return on equity (%)LTVR award (% vested)
2016201720182019
Total shareholder return (from 1 October 2014)
(30)
(20)
(10)
0
10
20
30
Total shareholder return (%)
Oct 14Oct 15Oct 16Oct 17Oct 18Oct 19
Peer 1Peer 2Peer 3Westpac
Cash earnings and CEO STVR award (2015 to 2019)
15%
0%
30%
45%
60%
75%
100%
150%
6,000
6,300
6,600
6,900
7,200
7,800
7,500
8,100
STVR award for the CEO
Cash earnings ($m)
2015
Cash earnings ($m)
STVR award for the CEO (% of target)
2016201720182019
0
0
2,000
1,000
4,000
2,000
6,000
3,000
8,00010,00012,000
5,0004,000
2019 Total Remuneration
2019 Total Remuneration
Craig Bright
2
Chief
Information
Ocer
1,0082019381
Lyn Cobley
Chief Executive,
Westpac
Institutional Bank
1,122
1,1222019
2018
582339
494466
Peter King
Chief Financial
Ocer
1,288517506
1,2883276012019
2018
Rebecca Lim
Group Executive,
Legal & Secretariat
950
950
263
287357
2019
2018
409
David Lindberg
Chief Executive,
Consumer
1,124
1,088
2019
2018
516516
440441
125
Brian Hartzer
Managing Director
& Chief Executive
Ocer
2,686
2019
2018
1,0411,218
1,329
2,686
Realised: 4,015
Foregone (max): 8,096
Realised: 1,389
Foregone (max): 308
Realised: 1,765
Foregone (max): 2,759
Realised: 2,043
Foregone (max): 3,211
Realised: 2,216
Foregone (max): 2,954
Realised: 1,622
Foregone (max): 805
Managing Director & Chief Executive Officer
Current Group Executives
542019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Directors’ report
1. Equity that vested on 1 October 2019 is included in the 2019 figures. Equity that vested on 1 October 2018 is included in the 2018 figures.
2. The information relates to the period the individual was a KMP. Refer to section 1 for further details.
Fixed remunerationCash STVR payment
Vesting of prior year LTVR awards
Vesting of prior year deferred STVR awards
2019 maximum realisable remuneration
3.3. Total realised remuneration – Chief Executive Officer and Group Executives (unaudited)
The charts below summarise the actual remuneration paid and the equity vested
1
to the CEO and Group Executives
relative to the maximum remuneration that could have been received in 2019 and 2018, including:
• fixed remuneration earned during the year;
• cash STVR awarded in respect of the year;
• deferred STVR awarded in prior years that vested during the year; and
• LTVR awarded in prior years that vested during the year.
The charts below also reference the maximum value of remuneration foregone in 2019, including cash STVR not
awarded in respect of the year (based on the maximum STVR opportunity) and deferred STVR and LTVR awarded
in prior years that was forfeited, adjusted or lapsed during the year.
The value of deferred STVR and LTVR is based on the number of restricted shares or share rights multiplied by the
five day volume weighted average share price (VWAP) up to and including the date of vesting. The value of equity
differs from the disclosure in section 7.
Total realised remuneration ($’000)
01,0002,0003,0005,0004,0002019 Total Remuneration
Carolyn McCann
Group Executive,
Customer &
Corporate Relations
195
202
213
2019
2018
740260
75
David McLean
Chief Executive Ocer,
Westpac New Zealand
1,029
901
2019
2018
538427
370498
Christine Parker
Group Executive,
Human Resources
884
884
2019
2018
501315
422428
David Stephen
Chief Risk
O
cer
2019
1,800466
Gary Thursby
Chief Operating
Ocer
900
840
2019
2018
467315
369396
Alastair Welsh
2
Acting Chief
Executive,
Business
2019
135
402
Brad Cooper
2
Chief Executive Ocer,
BT Financial Group
553
1,103
2019
2018
615
666400
Dave Curran
2
Chief Information
O
cer
190
1,054
2019
2018
571
485445
George Frazis
2
Chief Executive,
Consumer Bank
577
1,150
2019
2018
701
735480
Realised: 1,195
Foregone (max): 703
Realised: 1,994
Foregone (max): 2,275
Realised: 1,700
Foregone (max): 2,165
Realised: 2,266
Foregone (max): 547
Realised: 1,682
Foregone (max): 1,082
Realised: 537
Foregone (max): 165
Realised: 1,168
Foregone (max): 3,127
Realised: 761
Foregone (max): 2,156
Realised: 1,278
Foregone (max): 3,006
Former Group Executives
1
2
3
4
552019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Directors’ report
3.4. Other payments made and equity vested during 2019
Craig Bright had 39,827 restricted shares granted under the Restricted Share Plan which vested in August 2019.
David Stephen had 15,727 restricted shares granted under the Restricted Share Plan which vested in March 2019.
The restricted shares were allocated in respect of equity forfeited from their previous employers on joining Westpac.
In addition, Craig Bright received a one-off cash payment of $1,050,000 in lieu of variable reward forfeited from his
previous employer on joining Westpac.
w
562019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Directors’ report
3.5. 2019 CEO and Group Executive short term variable reward outcomes
2019 CEO short term variable reward scorecard
The graphic below illustrates the CEO’s 2019 scorecard outcomes reflecting Group and individual performance.
Group financial performance (40%)
Primary measures of performance include cash earnings and cash ROE against plan,
having regard to cost and margin outcomes.
• Cash earnings were $6,849 million, down $1,216 million (or 15%) compared to 2018
and 81% of the target of $8,411 million, resulting in a zero outcome for the cash
earnings score. Group financial performance was negatively impacted by increased
lending and deposit competition, economy wide slowing of credit growth and
higher regulatory and compliance costs.
• Cash earnings were also impacted by provisions for estimated customer refunds,
payments, associated costs, and litigation, as well as costs associated with
the restructuring of the Wealth business. Excluding the impact of these items,
Westpac’s cash earnings were $7,979 million, down $367 million (or 4%) compared
to 2018.
• Impairment charges were slightly lower as asset quality remained sound. Excluding
the items outlined above, expenses were a little lower, down $16m on 2018, and
margin compression was limited to 4bps with the Group margin (excluding
Treasury & Markets) of 2.08%, resulting in a positive outcome for this focus area of
the scorecard.
• Delivered cash ROE of 10.75%, which is down from 13.00% in 2018 and lower than
the 13.15% target, resulting in a zero outcome for the cash ROE score.
[Non-financial]
0%100%150%
21% of target
Weighted outcome:
8% of target (6% of maximum)
Risk management (15%)
Financial risk management:
Performance measurement is based on operating performance relative to Westpac’s
Risk Appetite Statement as measured by Capital, Funding and Liquidity Management
and Credit Quality.
• Our common equity tier 1 ratio was 10.67%, Net Stable Funding Ratio was 112% and
the Liquidity Coverage Ratio was 127%.
• Maintained sound credit quality across the portfolio, with ratio of stressed assets
to total committed exposures at 1.20%.
Financial
0%100%150%
0%100%150%
87% of target
Non-financial risk management:
Performance measurement is based on operating performance relative to Westpac’s
Risk Appetite Statement, improvements to the control environment and audit and
compliance issue resolution.
• Increased investment to improve non-financial risk management capability over
the year including through targeted hiring in critical roles.
• Notwithstanding this improvement, progress in resolving risk and compliance
matters fell short of our expectations.
• Ongoing significant focus on resolving and remediating compliance, regulatory
and customer issues, including enhancing risk management of sales practices,
product design and maintenance and financial crime systems and processes.
Non-financial
0%100%150%
0%100%150%
0% of target
Weighted outcome (combined):
7% of target (4% of maximum)
Customer outcomes (20%)
Primary measures of performance include net promoter scores (NPS) and complaints
handling.
• Improved service quality for our customers resulting in solid customer growth and
an improvement in NPS. The Business division achieved its target to maintain the
Number 1 ranking on both Customer Satisfaction and NPS having widened the gap
to Number 2. The Consumer division narrowed the gap to Number 1 on NPS and
maintained the Number 2 ranking for the majority of the year.
• Improved how we manage complaints across the Group, through rollout of Group-
wide Complaints Management Framework, refreshed training, simplified internal
processes, detailed root cause analysis and dedicated support for vulnerable
customers. This resulted in a 46% reduction in the average time taken to resolve
issues for customers (which exceeded the 10% target) and the closure of over 1,100
long dated complaints.
[Non-financial]
0%100%150%
99% of target
Weighted outcome:
20% of target (13% of maximum)
TargetMaximumOutcome
w
1
2
3
4
572019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Directors’ report
Customer service transformation (15%)
Primary measures of performance include delivery of strategic initiatives.
• Delivered customer benefits and improved strategic capability through progress in
relation to Service Revolution Transformation milestones, including the Customer
Service Hub and Panorama.
• Significant investment in technology simplification and foundational platforms
improving stability, functionality and efficiency of the technology environment.
• Number of digitally active consumers up 4% and an increase in digital sales in the
Consumer and Business divisions.
• Achieved the target structural productivity of $405 million, a 33% uplift from 2018
and a net ~5% reduction in FTE over the year.
• Execution of the ‘Wealth Reset’ (including the exit of advice business), helping
to deliver a better and more integrated experience for customers and reducing
structural costs.
0%100%150%
100% of target
Weighted outcome:
15% of target (10% of maximum)
Culture and capability (10%)
Performance is measured based on delivery of key people initiatives that further drive
the organisation’s change agenda.
• Delivered key milestones as part of our people strategy within budget and on
schedule, including human capital management systems and the efficiency of the
organisation’s structure, for example, reducing layers between decision makers and
customers.
• Strengthened succession planning across our talent base following the structural
shifts made in the first half of the year.
• Implemented a number of recommendations stemming from the Royal
Commission and our Culture, Governance and Accountability report.
• Employee engagement has remained stable in a challenging industry environment.
Monthly spot engagement numbers have increased during the year in line with the
delivery of our strategy and remediation activity.
0%100%150%
0%
100%150%
102% of target
Weighted outcome:
10% of target (7% of maximum)
Modifier and final outcome
The 2019 STVR outcome for the CEO was zero.
(
Target STVR opportunity
x
Scorecard focus areas outcome
)
–
Scorecard modifier reduction
=
Final outcome
$2,686,00060% of target (40% of maximum)Zero
The CEO recommended to the Board that he forego his STVR for this year. Notwithstanding the scorecard outcome
of 60% of target, the Board separately considered the matter and determined that a zero STVR outcome for 2019 for
the CEO was appropriate to reflect accountability for poor non-financial risk and financial outcomes, as well as some
poor customer outcomes, including those highlighted at the Royal Commission.
2019 Group Executive short term variable reward outcomes
The focus areas of the CEO scorecard are cascaded to Group Executives in combination with other relevant
divisional or functional measures.
2019 STVR outcomes for Group Executives ranged from 0% to 83% of the target opportunity (or 0% to 55% of the
maximum opportunity). The average 2019 STVR outcome for Group Executives was 56% of the target opportunity
(or 37% of the maximum opportunity), down from 87% in 2018.
The average 2019 STVR outcome for functional Group Executives was 70% of the target opportunity. The average
2019 STVR outcome for Australia based Group Executives leading major divisions (including Consumer, Business,
Westpac Institutional Bank and the former BT Financial Group) was 30% of the target opportunity.
The variability in outcomes reflects the lower weighting of financial and customer measures in scorecards for
functional Group Executives in line with the nature of their roles and responsibilities.
In addition, individual and divisional performance impacted STVR outcomes, as well as the application of
downward remuneration adjustments for material risk and compliance matters.
The 2019 STVR outcomes for the CEO and Group Executives are detailed in the following section.
582019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Directors’ report
3.6. Variable reward awarded in 2019 (unaudited)
The table below shows the variable reward awarded to the CEO and Group Executives in 2019, including:
• STVR outcomes for 2019
1
(including the cash and deferred equity components
2
); and
• equity granted under the 2019 LTVR plan
3
.
The final value of equity received by the CEO and Group Executives will depend on the share price at the time
of vesting and the number of restricted shares or share rights that vest, subject to performance hurdles (where
applicable), continued service and adjustment.
The value of equity differs from the disclosure in section 7 which provides the annualised accounting value for
unvested equity awards prepared in accordance with the AAS.
2019 STVR award2019 LTVR award
Name
Target
STVR
opportunity
Maximum
STVR
opportunity
STVR
award (as %
of target)
STVR
award
(as % of
maximum)
STVR
outcome
2
Maximum
STVR
foregone Fair value
3
Face value
4
Managing Director & Chief Executive Officer
Brian Hartzer 2,686,000 4,029,000 0%0%0 4,029,000 2,528,000 5,616,534
Current Group Executives
Craig Bright
5
Chief Information Officer 918,000 1,377,000 83%55% 762,000 615,000 864,000 2,082,651
Lyn Cobley
Chief Executive,
Westpac Institutional Bank 1,122,000 1,683,000 60%40% 677,000 1,006,000 1,056,000 2,346,148
Peter King
Chief Financial Officer 1,088,000 1,632,000 60%40% 653,000 979,000 1,024,000 2,275,045
Rebecca Lim
Group Executive,
Legal & Secretariat 750,000 1,125,000 70%47% 525,000 600,000 700,000 1,555,172
David Lindberg
Chief Executive,
Consumer 1,124,000 1,686,000 22%15% 250,000 1,436,000 1,052,000 2,344,576
Carolyn McCann
Group Executive,
Customer & Corporate Relations 555,000 832,500 70%47% 389,000 443,500 555,000 1,233,059
David McLean
Chief Executive Officer,
Westpac New Zealand 1,028,900 1,543,350 83%55% 853,949 689,401 941,090 2,090,840
Christine Parker
Group Executive,
Human Resources 900,000 1,350,000 70%47% 630,000 720,000 816,000 1,812,901
David Stephen
Chief Risk Officer 1,350,000 2,025,000 69%46% 932,000 1,093,000 1,012,500 2,516,258
Gary Thursby
Chief Operating Officer 900,000 1,350,000 70%47% 630,000 720,000 850,000 1,888,451
Alastair Welsh
5
Acting Chief Executive, Business 400,000 600,000 68%45% 270,000 330,000 - -
Former Group Executives
Brad Cooper
5
Chief Executive Officer,
BT Financial Group 800,000 1,200,000 0%0%0 1,200,000 1,050,000 2,332,807
Dave Curran
5,6
Chief Information Officer - - -- - - - -
George Frazis
5
Chief Executive, Consumer Bank 800,000 1,200,000 0%0%0 1,200,000 1,000,000 2,221,730
Average Group Executive STVR award (%)56%37%
1. The target STVR opportunity and STVR award have been apportioned for part year KMP to reflect their time as KMP.
2. The deferred STVR (granted as restricted shares or unhurdled share rights) is 50% of the total STVR award for the year. The number of
restricted shares granted is determined by reference to the five day VWAP up to and including the day before the grant date. This is
adjusted for non-payment of dividends over the vesting period for unhurdled share rights. The five day VWAP for the 2018 award was
$24.86.
3. The fair value of the performance share rights is shown as at the commencement of the performance period and is determined by an
independent valuer using a Monte Carlo simulation pricing model, taking into consideration the life of the awards, the performance
hurdles and likelihood of vesting, non-payment of dividends prior to vesting and appropriate discount rates. The Board Remuneration
Committee caps the valuation at a maximum discount of 60% of the share price. The fair value of the 2019 award was capped at $11.12.
4. The face value of the performance share rights is calculated by multiplying the number of performance share rights granted during the
year by the five day VWAP up to and including the grant date. For the 2019 awards, the five day VWAP was $24.71 except for Craig
Bright and David Stephen where the five day VWAP was $26.81 and $27.64 respectively.
5. The information relates to the period the individual was a KMP. Refer to section 1 for further details.
6. Dave Curran was not eligible to receive a 2019 STVR or 2019 LTVR award.
1
2
3
4
592019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Directors’ report
4. Further detail on the executive variable reward structure
This section provides further details of the 2019 STVR and LTVR plans and changes for 2020.
4.1. Short term variable reward
The table below sets out the key design features of the 2019 STVR plan and changes for the 2020 STVR plan.
Short term variable reward plan
Plan structure50% of STVR is awarded in cash and 50% is deferred into equity in the form of restricted shares
(or unhurdled share rights for the Group Executive based outside Australia).
One unhurdled share right entitles the holder to one ordinary share at the time of vesting with no
exercise cost.
One restricted share provides the holder with one ordinary share at no cost subject to trading restrictions
until the time of vesting.
Dividends are paid on restricted shares from the grant date.
Target and maximum
opportunity
The target opportunity for the CEO and Group Executives is expressed as a percentage of fixed
remuneration. The target opportunity is set by the Board following recommendation from the Board
Remuneration Committee which considers a range of factors including market competitiveness and the
nature of the role.
Target STVR
(100% of fixed remuneration for the CEO and between
75% and 145% of fixed remuneration for Group Executives
Maximum STVR
(150% of target STVR)
0%100%150%
Remuneration at-risk
Westpac’s STVR is designed to award the target opportunity on
delivery of agreed plan targets for financial and non-financial
measures that support Westpac’s strategic priorities. It is possible
for the outcome to fall below the target amount depending on
performance relative to targets agreed at the beginning of the
year.
Reward for exceptional
performance
There is the possibility to
award up to a maximum of
150% of the STVR target
in circumstances where
exceptional outcomes are
achieved that are also in line
with the Group’s risk appetite
and where an individual
has acted in a manner that
exemplifies the encouraged
behaviours.
Performance measuresSTVR awards are determined based on performance against a balanced scorecard which is designed to
align with shareholder interests by setting challenging measures and seeks to ensure that our customers’
and employees’ needs are met and appropriate risk settings are maintained.
The scorecard is split into two sections:
• Focus areas: Performance is assessed against a balance of financial and non-financial metrics that are
imperative to supporting the effective execution of Westpac’s strategy; and
• Modifier: The Board and Board Remuneration Committee recognise that performance metrics may
not always appropriately reflect overall performance of the Group. The modifier supports adjustment
of the outcome, upwards or downwards (including to zero), for behaviour, risk and reputation matters,
people management matters, and any other matters that the Board feels are not fully reflected in the
focus areas.
Further information on focus areas and application of the modifier for the 2019 scorecard is provided in
section 3.
Deferred STVR awards recognise past performance and are subject to continued service and adjustment.
Deferral period50% of STVR is deferred into equity for a period of up to two years, which aligns executive remuneration
with shareholder interests and acts as a retention mechanism. The deferral period also allows the Board
to apply discretion to reduce deferred components where necessary.
Deferred STVR vests in equal portions one and two years after the grant date, subject to continued
service and adjustment.
Delayed vestingThe Board also has discretion (subject to law) to delay vesting of equity-based awards if the individual is
under investigation for misconduct, the subject of or implicated in legal or regulatory proceedings, if the
Board is considering an adjustment or if otherwise required by law.
Remuneration adjustments for
prior period matters
The Board has discretion to adjust current year STVR.
The Board may also adjust unvested deferred STVR downwards, including to zero, if circumstances
or information come to light which mean that in the Board’s view all or part of the award was not
appropriate.
The Board will typically apply the adjustment to unvested STVR where an adjustment to current year
STVR is considered insufficient or unavailable.
Changes for 2020 Clawback will apply, to the extent legally permissible and practicable, to deferred STVR awarded in
respect of performance periods commencing on or after 1 October 2019 for up to seven years from
the date of grant. Clawback may occur in circumstances of serious or gross misconduct, fraud, bribery,
severe reputational damage, and any other deliberate, reckless or unlawful conduct that may have a
serious adverse impact on Westpac, its customers or its people which has resulted in dismissal or the
Board considers at its discretion would have justified the dismissal of the relevant executive or where
otherwise required by law. It is the Board’s current intention that clawback will only be considered for
relevant conduct that occurred on or after 1 October 2019.
602019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Directors’ report
4.2. Long Term Variable Reward
The table below sets out the key design features of the 2019 LTVR Plan awarded in December 2018 and changes
for the 2020 LTVR plan.
Long term variable reward plan
Plan structureLTVR is awarded in performance share rights which vest after four years subject to the achievement of
performance hurdles, continued service and adjustment.
One performance share right entitles the holder to one ordinary share at the time of vesting with no exercise
cost. Dividends are not accumulated on performance share rights.
Award opportunityThe value of LTVR awarded to the CEO and Group Executives is expressed as a percentage of fixed
remuneration. The value of LTVR is set by the Board following recommendation from the Board
Remuneration Committee which considers a range of factors including market competitiveness and the
nature of the role.
The face value of the LTVR opportunity for the CEO for 2019 is 235% of fixed remuneration, and the face
value of LTVR opportunities for the Group Executives (excluding acting Group Executives) range between
185% and 240% of fixed remuneration.
Refer below for changes to apply for the 2020 LTVR award.
Allocation methodologyIn 2019 and prior years, the number of performance share rights each executive received was determined
by dividing the dollar value of the LTVR award by the fair value of the share right at the beginning of the
performance period. This is valued by an independent valuer using a Monte Carlo simulation pricing model,
taking into consideration the life of the awards, the performance hurdles and likelihood of vesting, non-
payment of dividends prior to vesting and appropriate discount rates. The Board Remuneration Committee
caps the valuation at a maximum discount of 60% of the share price. The value of a relative TSR hurdled
performance share right may be different to the value of a cash ROE hurdled performance share right.
Refer below for changes to apply for the 2020 LTVR award.
Performance hurdlesLTVR performance hurdles represent a balance of internal and external measures that aims to achieve
long-term growth in shareholders’ value and support alignment between executive reward and shareholder
interests.
Relative Total Shareholder Return
50% of the award
Cash return on equity
50% of the award
Relative TSR hurdled performance share rights
only vest where Westpac’s TSR exceeds that of key
competitors.
Relative TSR is a measure of the total return
delivered to shareholders over the performance
period assuming dividends are reinvested, relative
to peers.
The performance hurdle measures Westpac’s TSR
performance over a four year period against a
composite index. The composite index is comprised
of a group of 10 peers with more weight placed on
the three other major Australian banks.
At the end of the performance period, TSR
performance of each index company is multiplied
by its index weighting, and the total of the 10 scores
determines the composite TSR index.
50% will vest if Westpac’s TSR performance
equals the composite TSR index. For 100% to vest,
Westpac’s TSR outcome must exceed the index by
21.55 (i.e. 5% compound annual growth over the four
year performance period) as illustrated below.
100
75
50
25
%
of all ocation
vesting
Relative Total Shareholder Return vesting
Index
Index exceeded by
21 .55
Relative TSR perfor mance
The performance hurdle measures the average cash
return on average ordinary equity over a three year
performance period (with an additional one year
holding lock).
The performance hurdle aims to reward the
achievement of returns above Westpac’s cost of
capital while generating shareholder value and
improving how efficiently the Group uses capital
resources within its risk appetite.
The performance period for cash ROE differs to the
TSR performance period because TSR is an external
measure that can be calculated on an ongoing basis
whereas cash ROE is an internal measure where
the hurdle reflects the time horizon of our financial
forecasting.
The graph below shows the performance levels
required for the cash ROE performance share rights
to vest.
100
75
50
25
%
of allo
cation
Cash return on equity vesting
14%
Cash ROE perfor mance
13%
The companies in the 2019 composite TSR index and their relative weightings are:
ANZ Banking Group
Commonwealth Bank
National Australia Bank
AMP
Bank of Queensland
16.67%
16.67%
16.67%
7.14%
7.14%
Bendigo and Adelaide Bank
Challenger
Macquarie Group
Perpetual
Suncorp Group
7.14%
7.14%
7.14%
7.14%
7.14%
Refer below for changes to apply for the 2020 LTVR award.
1
2
3
4
612019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Directors’ report
Long term variable reward plan
Assessment of
performance outcomes
Relative Total Shareholder Return
The relative TSR result is calculated independently
to ensure objectivity and external validation before
being provided to the Board to determine the vesting
outcome.
The Board may exercise discretion in determining the
final vesting outcome, for example where relative TSR
performance hurdles have been met but the absolute
TSR outcome is negative.
Performance share rights subject to relative TSR
performance will be tested against the performance
hurdle on 30 September 2022.
Cash return on equity
The cash ROE outcome is determined by the Board
based on cash ROE disclosed in the Group’s results
over the performance period.
The Board may exercise discretion in determining the
final vesting outcome.
Performance share rights subject to cash ROE
performance will be tested against the performance
hurdle on 30 September 2021 and will be subject
to an additional one year holding lock through to
30 September 2022.
No re-testingThere is no re-testing. Awards that have not vested after the measurement period lapse immediately.
Early vestingUnvested awards may vest before a test date if the executive is no longer employed by the Group due to
death or disability (subject to law). In these cases, vesting is generally not subject to the performance hurdles
being met.
Delayed vestingThe Board also has discretion (subject to law) to delay vesting of equity-based awards if the individual is
under investigation for misconduct, the subject of or implicated in legal or regulatory proceedings, if the
Board is considering an adjustment or if otherwise required by law.
Treatment of awards on
cessation of employment
The Board has the discretion to determine the treatment of unvested performance share rights where the
CEO or a Group Executive resigns, retires or otherwise leaves the Group before vesting occurs.
The Board may choose to accelerate the vesting of performance share rights or leave the awards on foot for
the remainder of the performance period.
In exercising its discretion, the Board will consider relevant circumstances including those relating to the
departure.
The Board also has the ability to adjust the number of performance share rights downwards (including to
zero) in the event of misconduct resulting in significant financial and/or reputational impact to the Group and
in other circumstances considered appropriate.
Where an executive acts fraudulently or dishonestly, or is in material breach of their obligations under the
relevant equity plan, unexercised performance share rights (whether vested or unvested) will be forfeited
unless the Board determines otherwise.
Remuneration
adjustments for prior
period matters
The Board has discretion to adjust LTVR which is awarded on a prospective basis.
The Board may also adjust unvested LTVR downwards, including to zero, if circumstances or information
come to light which mean that in the Board’s view all or part of the award was not appropriate.
The Board will typically apply the adjustment to unvested LTVR where an adjustment to current and deferred
STVR is considered insufficient or unavailable.
Changes for 2020Allocation methodology: From the 2020 LTVR plan onwards, the number of performance share rights each
executive receives will be determined by dividing the dollar value of the LTVR award by the face value of
performance share rights. The face value is the five day VWAP up to the commencement of the performance
period (which is 1 October 2019 for the 2020 LTVR grant).
Award opportunity: The Board reduced the face value of 2020 LTVR opportunities by 43% for the CEO and
23% to 25% for Group Executives (excluding acting Group Executives). When setting LTVR opportunities
for the CEO and Group Executives, the Board took into account that no dividends are payable on LTVR
performance share rights, the minimum variable remuneration deferrals required by Banking Executive
Accountability Regime (BEAR) and the overall market positioning of the executives’ remuneration
(including adjusting from a fair value to face value allocation methodology). The face value of the 2020
LTVR opportunity for the CEO is 133% of fixed remuneration, and the 2020 LTVR opportunities for Group
Executives (excluding acting Group Executives) range between 140% and 180% of fixed remuneration. The
Board intends the same percentages of fixed remuneration to apply to the determination of LTVR grants at
face value in future years, subject to market benchmarking and any changes that may flow from the release
of APRA’s final regulatory framework for remuneration.
Performance hurdle: Relative TSR has been selected as the performance hurdle for the 2020 LTVR plan as
the Board believes this measure best aligns executive remuneration outcomes with long-term shareholder
value creation. The Board considers that setting an absolute cash ROE range over a three year period
has become increasingly difficult in light of current uncertainties surrounding future regulatory capital
requirements and interest rates, which are at historically low levels. The Board will review the 2021 LTVR plan
following the release of APRA’s final regulatory framework for remuneration.
Clawback: Clawback will apply, to the extent legally permissible and practicable, to LTVR awarded in respect
of performance periods commencing on or after 1 October 2019 for up to seven years from the date of grant.
Clawback may occur in circumstances of serious or gross misconduct, fraud, bribery, severe reputational
damage, and any other deliberate, reckless or unlawful conduct that may have a serious adverse impact on
Westpac, its customers or its people which has resulted in dismissal or the Board considers at its discretion
would have justified the dismissal of the relevant executive or where otherwise required by law. It is the
Board’s current intention that clawback will only be considered for relevant conduct that occurred on or after
1 October 2019.
The table below details other LTVR awards currently on foot.
Vesting datePerformance hurdlesFurther detail
2017 LTVR award30 September 2020• Relative TSR performance against a weighted composite index
of comparator companies (50%)
• Average cash ROE performance (50%)
Refer to the 2017
Annual Report
2018 LTVR award30 September 2021• Relative TSR performance against a weighted composite index
of comparator companies (50%)
• Average cash ROE performance (50%)
Refer to the 2018
Annual Report
622019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Directors’ report
5. Remuneration governance
5.1. Remuneration policy and governance oversight
Westpac’s remuneration policy sets out the mandatory requirements to be reflected in the design and
management of remuneration arrangements across Westpac.
The policy supports Westpac’s vision by requiring the design and management of remuneration to align with
stakeholder interests, support long-term financial soundness and encourage prudent risk management.
The policy is supported by an established governance structure, plans and frameworks, that are designed to
support remuneration decision-making across the Group.
Board
The Board provides strategic guidance for the Group and has oversight of management. The Board has overall
accountability for reviewing and approving executive remuneration as well as Non-executive Director Board and
Committee fees (subject to the Board fee pool approved by shareholders).
Without limiting its role, the Board approves (following recommendation from the Board Remuneration
Committee) performance targets for the CEO, the size of variable reward pools, remuneration (including variable
reward targets and performance outcomes) for the CEO, Group Executives, any other accountable persons
under the BEAR, other persons whose activities in the Board’s opinion affect the financial soundness of the
Group, any other person specified by APRA and any other person the Board determines.
The Board has the discretion to defer, adjust or withdraw aggregate and individual variable reward.
Further detail is contained in the Board and Committee Charters which are available on Westpac’s website.
Board Remuneration Committee
The Board Remuneration Committee assists the Board to fulfil its remuneration responsibilities to shareholders
by monitoring the remuneration policies and practices of the Group and their effectiveness, external
remuneration practices, market expectations and regulatory requirements in Australia and globally. The Board
Remuneration Committee reviews and makes recommendations to the Board in relation to the individual
remuneration levels of individuals outlined above, STVR and LTVR plans and outcomes for the Group Executives
and any other Accountable Persons under the BEAR as well as performance goals and objectives relevant to the
remuneration of the CEO and any and all equity based plans.
In carrying out its duties, the Board Remuneration Committee accesses risk and financial control personnel and
engages external advisers who are independent of management.
Members of the Board Remuneration Committee are independent Non-executive Directors.
Further detail is contained in the Board Remuneration Committee Charter which is available on Westpac’s website.
Interaction with other Board CommitteesManagement remuneration oversight committees
The Chairman of the Board Risk & Compliance
Committee is also a member of the Board
Remuneration Committee. Members of the Board
Remuneration Committee are all members of the
Board Risk & Compliance Committee. The cross
membership of both Committees supports alignment
between risk and reward.
The Board Remuneration Committee seeks feedback
from and considers matters raised by the Board
Risk & Compliance Committee and Board Audit
Committee with respect to remuneration outcomes,
adjustments to remuneration in light of relevant
matters and alignment of remuneration with the risk
management framework.
Divisional remuneration oversight committees
consider areas of risk within the divisions and
consider potential implications for remuneration.
These committees report to the Group Remuneration
Oversight Committee which in turn considers
consistency of remuneration across the Group and
provides information to the Board Remuneration
Committee and Board for review and decision-making
as appropriate.
During the financial year, remuneration governance
arrangements were reviewed and changes were
made to the Terms of Reference for the Group
Remuneration Oversight Committee. This included
an added responsibility for the Group Remuneration
Oversight Committee to review the design and
implementation of remuneration systems for front line
staff, annually, in line with Recommendation 5.4 from
the Royal Commission.
Remuneration consultants
In 2019, the Board retained Guerdon Associates as its independent consultant to provide specialist information
on executive remuneration and other remuneration matters. The services were provided directly to the Board
Remuneration Committee independent of management. The Chairman of the Board Remuneration Committee oversees
the engagement and associated costs. Work undertaken by Guerdon Associates during 2019 included the provision of
information relating to the benchmarking of Non-executive Director, CEO and Group Executive remuneration.
In 2019, no remuneration recommendations, as prescribed under the Corporations Act, were made by Guerdon
Associates.
1
2
3
4
632019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Directors’ report
5.2. Executive minimum shareholding requirements and current compliance
The CEO and Group Executives are required to build and maintain a significant Westpac shareholding within five
years of their appointment to strengthen alignment with shareholder interests.
At 30 September 2019, the CEO and all Group Executives comply with the requirement. The table below sets out
the minimum shareholding requirement for the CEO and Group Executives.
Minimum shareholding requirement
Chief Executive OfficerFive times annual fixed remuneration excluding superannuation, equivalent to $12.26 million
Group ExecutivesEquivalent to $1.2 million
The multiple for the CEO’s shareholding requirement is higher than that of his peers and reflects Westpac’s
approach to calculating the minimum shareholding requirement.
Since 2006, the following has been included for the purpose of calculating the minimum shareholding requirement:
• shares held outright in the individual’s name either solely or jointly with another person;
• shares held in an employee share plan (including deferred STVR); and
• 50% of any unvested performance share rights (including LTVR).
The assessment approach has included shares held in a family trust or self-managed super fund since 2012.
The minimum shareholding requirement will be reviewed in 2020 following the release of APRA’s final regulatory
framework for remuneration.
5.3. Hedging policy
Participants in Westpac’s equity plans are forbidden from entering, either directly or indirectly, into hedging
arrangements for unvested awards in the STVR and LTVR plans. No financial products may be used to mitigate
the risk associated with these awards. Any attempt to hedge awards will result in forfeiture and the Board may
consider other disciplinary action. These restrictions satisfy the requirements of the Corporations Act which
prohibits hedging of unvested awards.
5.4. Employment agreements
The remuneration and other terms of employment for the CEO and Group Executives are formalised in their
employment agreements. Each agreement provides for the payment of fixed and variable reward, employer
superannuation contributions and other benefits such as death and disablement insurance cover.
The table below details the key terms including termination provisions of the employment agreements for the CEO
and Group Executives in 2019.
TermWhoConditions
Duration of agreementCEO and Group Executives• Ongoing until notice given by either party
Notice (by the executive or the Group) to
terminate employment
CEO and Group Executives• 12 months
1
Termination payments on termination
without cause
2
CEO and Group Executives• Deferred STVR and LTVR awards vest
according to the applicable equity plan
rules
Termination for causeCEO and Group Executives (excluding
Brad Cooper)
• Immediately for misconduct
• 3 months’ notice for poor performance
Brad Cooper
3
• Immediately for misconduct
• Contractual notice period for poor
performance
Post-employment restraintsCEO and Group Executives• 12 month non-solicitation restraint
1. Payment in lieu of notice may in certain circumstances be approved by the Board for some or all of the notice period.
2. The maximum liability for termination benefits for the CEO and Group Executives at 30 September 2019 was $16.0 million
(2018: $14.1 million).
3. Brad Cooper ceased in his KMP role as the Chief Executive Officer, BT Financial Group on 1 April 2019.
642019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Directors’ report
6. Non-executive Director remuneration
6.1. Structure and policy
Westpac’s Non-executive Director remuneration strategy is designed to attract and retain experienced, qualified
Board members and provide appropriate remuneration for their time and expertise.
Non-executive Director fees are not related to Westpac’s results. All fees are paid in cash and no discretionary
payments are made for performance. Non-executive Directors are required to build and maintain a minimum
shareholding to align their interests with those of shareholders (refer to section 6.4 for further details).
The table below sets out the components of Non-executive Director remuneration.
Non-executive Director remuneration
Base feeRelates to service on the Westpac Banking Corporation Board. The base fee for the Chairman covers
all responsibilities, including for Board Committees.
Committee feesAdditional fees are paid to Non-executive Directors (other than the Board Chairman) for chairing or
participating in Board Committees other than the Board Nominations Committee.
Employer superannuation
contributions
Reflects statutory superannuation contributions which are capped at the superannuation maximum
contributions base as prescribed under the Superannuation Guarantee legislation.
Subsidiary Board and Advisory
Board fees
Relates to service on Subsidiary Boards and Advisory Boards and are paid by the relevant subsidiary.
6.2. Non-executive Director remuneration in 2019
The base fees payable to the Chairman and other Non-executive Directors were reduced by 20% for 2019 as a
one-off measure. The reduction was applied to all current Non-executive Directors in recognition of the collective
accountability as the Board of Westpac for customer outcomes highlighted by the Royal Commission, shareholder
sentiment leading to the first strike at the 2018 Annual General Meeting and significant non-financial risk matters.
In addition, the Board Risk & Compliance Committee Chairman fee was increased from $70,400 to $90,000
effective 1 October 2018 to reflect the significant increase in the workload of the Committee Chairman. The table
below sets out the annual Board and standing Committee fees and the changes for 2019.
The Non-executive Director fee pool of $4.5 million per annum was approved by shareholders at the 2008
Annual General Meeting. For 2019, $3.11 million (69%) of the fee pool was used. The fee pool includes employer
superannuation contributions.
Base and Committee fees
Annual fee
$Changes for 2019
Chairman810,000One-off reduction of
$162,000 to $648,000
Other Non-executive Directors225,000One-off reduction of
$45,000 to $180,000
Committee Chairman fees
Board Audit Committee70,400No change
Board Risk & Compliance Committee90,000Fee increase to
$90,000 (from $70,400)
effective 1 October 2018
Board Remuneration Committee63,800No change
Board Technology Committee35,200No change
Committee membership fees
Board Audit Committee32,000No change
Board Risk & Compliance Committee32,000No change
Board Remuneration Committee29,000No change
Board Technology Committee20,000No change
Subsidiary Board and Advisory Board fees
During the reporting period, additional fees of $7,241 were paid to Peter Hawkins as a member of the Westpac
Group Victoria Advisory Board (formerly Bank of Melbourne Advisory Board) (during the period in which he was a
KMP) and additional fees of $83,146 were paid to Anita Fung as a member of the Westpac Asia Advisory Board.
1
2
3
4
652019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Directors’ report
6.3. Changes to Board and Committee composition
The table below outlines the changes that were made to the Board and Committee composition during the year
ended 30 September 2019.
Name of Non-executive DirectorChange in positionEffective date
Anita Fung• Appointed Non-executive Director
• Appointed member of the Board Risk & Compliance Committee
1 October 2018
Peter Hawkins• Retired from the Board12 December 2018 following
the completion of the 2018
Annual General Meeting
Ewen Crouch• Appointed member of the Board Audit Committee1 January 2019
Steven Harker• Appointed Non-executive Director
• Appointed member of the Board Risk & Compliance Committee
1 March 2019
Margaret Seale• Appointed Non-executive Director
• Appointed member of the Board Risk & Compliance Committee
1 March 2019
6.4. Non-executive Director minimum shareholding requirement
Non-executive Directors are required to build and maintain a holding in Westpac ordinary shares to align their
interests with those of shareholders. Each Non-executive Director is required to hold an interest in shares in
Westpac with a market value not less than the Board base fee, within five years of appointment to the Board.
At 30 September 2019, all Non-executive Directors comply with the requirement.
662019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Directors’ report
7. Statutory remuneration details
7.1. Details of Non-executive Director remuneration
The table below details Non-executive Director remuneration.
Short-term benefits
Post-employment
benefits
Westpac Banking
Corporation Board
fees
1
Subsidiary and
Advisory Board
fees
Non-
monetary
benefits
3
SuperannuationTotal
Name$$$$$
Current Non-executive Directors
Lindsay Maxsted, Chairman
2019 648,000 -- 20,658 668,658
2018810,000--20,181830,181
Nerida Caesar
2019 232,000 -- 20,658 252,658
2018277,000--20,181297,181
Ewen Crouch
2019 323,000 -- 20,658 343,658
2018324,400--20,181344,581
Alison Deans
2019 276,200 -- 20,658 296,858
2018312,965--20,181333,146
Craig Dunn
2019 275,800 -- 20,658 296,458
2018320,800--20,181340,981
Anita Fung
2019212,000 83,146 6,300 20,658322,104
2018---------------------------------- Not a KMP in 2018----------------------------------
Steven Harker
2
2019123,667--11,972135,639
2018---------------------------------- Not a KMP in 2018----------------------------------
Peter Marriott
2019 302,400 -- 20,658 323,058
2018347,400--20,181367,581
Peter Nash
2019 244,000 -- 20,658 264,658
2018164,690--11,744176,434
Margaret Seale
2
2019123,667-- 11,972 135,639
2018---------------------------------- Not a KMP in 2018----------------------------------
Former Non-executive Director
Peter Hawkins
2
201964,3757, 241-4,24875,864
2018311,83235,000-20,103366,935
Total fees
20192,825,10990,3876,300193,4563,115,252
20182,869,08835,000-152,9313,057,020
1. Includes fees paid to the Chairman and members of Board Committees.
2. The information relates to the period the individual was a KMP. Refer to section 1 for further details.
3. Non-monetary benefits are determined on the basis of the cost to the Group (including associated fringe benefits tax (FBT), where
applicable) and include provision of taxation advice.
1
2
3
4
672019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Directors’ report
7.2. Remuneration details – Chief Executive Officer and Group Executives
The table below sets out details of remuneration for the CEO and Group Executives calculated in accordance with
the AAS.
Short-term benefits
Post-
employment
benefits
Other
long-term
benefitsShare-based payments
Fixed
remuneration
1
Cash
STVR
award
2
Non-
monetary
benefits
3
Other
short-term
benefits
4
Superannuation
benefits
5
Long
service
leave
Restricted
shares
6
Share
rights
7, 8
Total
9
$$$$$$$$$
Managing Director & Chief Executive Officer
Brian Hartzer
20192,608,424-21,966 - 44,32040,6601,169,5811,168,0405,052,991
20182,730,714 1,040,825 20,618 - 42,235 40,697 1,449,964 1,247,127 6,572,180
Current Group Executives
Craig Bright, Chief Information Officer
10,11
2019 1,022,829 381,000 309,495 1,050,000 23,81815,137 2,075,911 170,797 5,048,987
2018------------------------------------------------------- Not a KMP in 2018 -------------------------------------------------------
Lyn Cobley, Chief Executive, Westpac Institutional Bank
20191,108,830338,5004,948 - 30,61116,995516,242508,4372,524,563
20181,085,585 465,500 4,039 - 29,993 17,000 749,930 394,975 2,747,022
Peter King, Chief Financial Officer
20191,222,006326,5004,238 - 36,80319,492549,189483,6922,641,920
20181,232,059 517,000 2,924 - 34,957 90,204 597,487 512,401 2,987,032
Rebecca Lim, Group Executive, Legal & Secretariat
2019950,128262,5004,981 - 31,71814,390422,793260,1081,946,618
2018903,728 356,500 2,924 - 29,912 55,507 512,169 348,768 2,209,508
David Lindberg, Chief Executive, Consumer
20191,129,075125,0006,592 - 30,43423,822470,092475,3682,260,383
20181,049,010 440,500 4,014 - 28,365 25,006 518,657 435,208 2,500,760
Carolyn McCann, Group Executive, Customer & Corporate Relations
2019731,367194,5004,828 - 21,57911,198445,723186,5631,595,758
2018241,365 74,500 1,915 - 5,579 12,665 144,344 25,395 505,763
David McLean, Chief Executive Officer, Westpac New Zealand
2019861,551426,9751,194 - 8 7,7 1 0 - - 907,5802,285,010
2018849,488 498,439 55,885 - 81,444 - - 785,206 2,270,462
Christine Parker, Group Executive, Human Resources
2019875,430315,0003,123 - 27,420(33,023)456,373384,0052,028,328
2018865,802 427,500 2,924 - 26,848 (8,854)500,697 399,535 2,214,452
David Stephen, Chief Risk Officer
2019 1,816,090 466,000 263,844 - 25,90027,2652,023,326 732,611 5,355,036
2018------------------------------------------------------- Not a KMP in 2018 -------------------------------------------------------
Gary Thursby, Chief Operating Officer
2019881,655315,0003,123 - 29,60523,294423,765306,6721,983,114
2018794,889 395,500 2,924 - 28,616 12,693 453,951 344,305 2,032,878
Alastair Welsh, Acting Chief Executive, Business
10
2019 369,151 135,000 438 - 11,861 6,557207,066 13,321 743,394
2018------------------------------------------------------- Not a KMP in 2018 -------------------------------------------------------
Former Group Executives
Brad Cooper, Chief Executive Officer, BT Financial Group
10,12,14
20191,553,160-27,860 - 95,64014,402608,2151,826,9724,126,249
20181,136,073 400,000 17,861- 29,366 16,700 778,096 538,531 2,916,627
Dave Curran, Chief Information Officer
10,14,15
2019173,917 - 1,115 36,475 6,019(45,839)140,1291,309,0461,620,862
20181,021,322 485,000 2,924 - 28,806 20,703 531,367 480,835 2,570,957
George Frazis, Chief Executive, Consumer Bank
10,13,14
20195 57,7 8 9-28,279522,50915,989(97,778)709,9401,739,9233,476,651
20181,109,913 480,000 16,771- 38,132 17,425 858,110 489,032 3,009,383
682019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Directors’ report
1. Fixed remuneration is the total cost of salary, salary sacrificed benefits (including motor vehicles, parking and associated FBT) and an
accrual for annual leave entitlements.
2. 2019 STVR awards reflect annual cash performance awards accrued but not yet paid in respect of the year ended 30 September 2019.
STVR awards are paid in December.
3. Non-monetary benefits are determined on the basis of the cost to the Group (including associated FBT, where applicable) and include
annual health checks, provision of taxation advice, bank funded car parking, relocation costs, living away from home expenses and
allowances. In the 2018 and 2017 Remuneration Reports, non-monetary benefits were understated and 2018 values for two individuals
have been amended in the table above. For 2017, a total of $27,694 was understated reflecting additional car parking benefits.
4. Includes payments on cessation of employment or other contracted amounts.
5. The CEO and Group Executives are provided with life insurance cover under the Westpac Group Plan at no cost. Superannuation
benefits have been calculated consistent with AASB 119 Employee Benefits.
6. The value of restricted shares is amortised over the applicable vesting period and the amount shown is the amortisation relating to 2019
(and 2018 for comparison). The restricted shares held by Craig Bright and David Stephen represent an allocation made in substitution
for forgone unvested equity on joining the Westpac Group. The restricted shares replicate the vesting periods of the equity forgone.
7. Equity-settled remuneration is based on the amortisation over the vesting period (normally one, two or four years) of the fair value
at grant date of hurdled and unhurdled options and share rights that were granted during the four years ended 30 September 2019.
Details of prior year grants are disclosed in previous Annual Reports. The 2019 value for David McLean includes 53% attributed to
deferred STVR awards. The 2019 value for David Stephen includes an allocation of hurdled share rights made in substitution for
unvested equity foregone on joining the Westpac Group, and is subject to Westpac’s 2018 LTVR performance hurdles and vesting
criteria.
8. The expensed value of the 2017 LTVR cash ROE hurdled performance share rights has been reduced to zero. The expensed value of the
2018 and 2019 LTVR cash ROE hurdled performance share rights have been reduced by 50%. This reflects the current assessment of the
probability of vesting.
9. The percentage of the total remuneration which is performance-related (i.e. cash STVR award plus share-based payments) was: Brian
Hartzer 46%, Craig Bright 52%, Lyn Cobley 54%, Peter King 51%, Rebecca Lim 49%, David Lindberg 47%, Carolyn McCann 52%, David
McLean 58%, Christine Parker 57%, David Stephen 60%, Gary Thursby 53%, Alastair Welsh 48%, Brad Cooper 59%, Dave Curran 89% and
George Frazis 70%. The percentage of total remuneration delivered in the form of options (including share rights) was: Brian Hartzer
23%, Craig Bright 3%, Lyn Cobley 20%, Peter King 18%, Rebecca Lim 13%, David Lindberg 21%, Carolyn McCann 12%, David McLean 40%,
Christine Parker 19%, David Stephen 14%, Gary Thursby 15%, Alastair Welsh 2%, Brad Cooper 44%, Dave Curran 81% and George Frazis
50%.
10. The information relates to the period the individual was a KMP. Refer to section 1 for further details.
11. Craig Bright received a one-off cash payment of $1,050,000 in lieu of variable reward forfeited from his previous employer on joining
the Westpac Group.
12. The information relates to Brad Cooper’s KMP role. This includes payments made or to be made during his 12 month notice period from
1 August 2019 to 31 July 2020, where Brad continues to receive fixed remuneration and superannuation. From 1 April 2019 to 31 July
2019, Brad acted as an advisor to the Group and received fixed remuneration of $371,730 (including superannuation), which has been
excluded from the table on the basis that it did not relate to his KMP role.
13. The information relates to George Frazis’ KMP role. From 1 April 2019 to 31 August 2019, George acted as an advisor to the Group and
received fixed remuneration of $480,709 (including superannuation), which has been excluded from the table on the basis that it did
not relate to his KMP role. The value of other short-term benefits relates to payments on cessation of employment, including 4 months’
pay in lieu of notice ($383,333) and annual leave and long service leave entitlements ($139,176).
14. The share based payment values for Brad Cooper, Dave Curran and George Frazis reflect the accruals for all unvested equity up to the
end of each performance period. For example, the 2019 LTVR will include the accrual for four years until the vesting date in lieu of a
single year accrual value for 2018. While the full value is being accrued for all unvested equity, the awards may or may not vest subject
to the relevant performance hurdles.
15. Dave Curran was not eligible to receive a 2019 STVR or 2019 LTVR award.
1
2
3
4
692019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Directors’ report
1. No performance options were granted in 2019. Deferred STVR awards in the form of restricted shares or unhurdled share rights
(for David McLean based in New Zealand) are awarded in December. David McLean’s unhurdled share rights were granted on 19
December 2018 at a fair value of $23.37 (unhurdled share rights which vested on 1 October 2019) and $21.88 (unhurdled rights vesting
on 1 October 2020).
2. No hurdled share rights granted in 2014 vested in October 2018 when assessed against the relative TSR and cash EPS performance
hurdles.
3. Vested options and share rights that were awarded prior to October 2009 can be exercised up to a maximum of 10 years from their
commencement date. Vested share rights awarded between October 2009 and July 2015 are automatically exercised at vesting. Vested
share rights granted after July 2015 may be exercised at will up to a maximum of 15 years from their commencement date. For each
vested share right and each performance option exercised during the year, the relevant executive received one fully paid Westpac
ordinary share. The exercise price for share rights is zero.
4. For performance share rights, the value granted represents the number of securities granted multiplied by the fair value per instrument
as set out in the table in the sub-section titled ‘Fair value of Long Term Variable Reward awards made during the year’ below. For
restricted shares, the value granted represents the number of ordinary shares granted multiplied by the five day VWAP of a Westpac
ordinary share on the date the shares were granted. These values, which represent the full value of the equity-based awards made to
the CEO and Group Executives in 2019, do not reconcile with the amount shown in the table in section 7.2 which shows the amount
amortised in the current year of equity awards over their vesting period. The minimum total value of the grants for future financial years
is zero and an estimate of the maximum possible total value in future financial years is the fair value, as shown above.
5. The value of each option or share right exercised, forfeited or lapsed is calculated based on the five day VWAP of Westpac ordinary
shares on the date of exercise (or forfeiture or lapse), less the relevant exercise price (if any). Where the exercise price is greater than
the five day VWAP of Westpac ordinary shares, the value has been calculated as zero.
6. The information relates to the period the individual was a KMP. Refer to section 1 for further details.
7.3. Movement in equity-settled instruments during the year
The table shows the movements in the number and value of equity instruments for the CEO and Group Executives
under the relevant plan during 2019.
NameType of equity-based instrument
Number
granted
1
Number
vested
2
Number
exercised
3
Value
granted
4
$
Value
exercised
5
$
Value
forfeited or
lapsed
5
$
Managing Director & Chief Executive Officer
Brian HartzerCEO Performance share rights227,338 - - 3,350,962 - 3,176,443
Performance share rights- - - - - 910,932
Shares under the CEO Restricted
Share Plan41,867 43,914 - 1,034,352 - -
Current Group Executives
Craig Bright
6
Performance share rights77,696 - - 1,224,953 - -
Shares under Restricted Share Plan132,151 39,827 - 3,542,324 - -
Lyn CobleyPerformance share rights94,964 - - 1,399,769 - -
Shares under Restricted Share Plan18,724 17,817 - 462,589 - -
Peter KingPerformance share rights92,086 - - 1,357,348 - 1,749,043
Shares under Restricted Share Plan20,796 18,234 - 513,779 - -
Rebecca LimPerformance share rights62,948 - - 927,854 - 367,504
Shares under Restricted Share Plan14,340 17,343 - 354,279 - -
David LindbergPerformance share rights94,602 - - 1,398,440 - 784,008
Shares under Restricted Share Plan17,719 15,875 - 437,760 - -
Carolyn McCannPerformance share rights49,910 - - 735,673 - 376,943
Shares under Restricted Share Plan9,818 10,541 - 242,560 - -
David McLeanPerformance share rights84,630 - - 1,247,446 - 948,126
Unhurdled share rights22,059 13,351 - 502,783 - -
Christine ParkerPerformance share rights73,380 - - 1,081,621 - 1,413,548
Shares under Restricted Share Plan17,196 15,210 - 424,838 - -
David StephenPerformance share rights278,698 - - 4,461,892 - -
Shares under Restricted Share Plan135,929 15,727 - 3,644,447 - -
Gary ThursbyPerformance share rights76,438 - - 1,126,696 - 452,315
Shares under Restricted Share Plan15,909 13,296 - 393,042 - -
Alastair Welsh
6
Performance share rights- - - - - -
Shares under Restricted Share Plan4,223 - - 116,704 - -
Former Group Executive
Brad Cooper
6
Performance share rights94,424 - - 1,391,810 - 1,978,989
Shares under Restricted Share Plan16,090 24,004 - 397,514 - -
Dave Curran
6
Performance share rights- - - - - 1,688,745
Shares under Restricted Share Plan- 16,038 - - - -
George Frazis
6
Performance share rights89,928 - - 1,325,539 - 1,548,156
Shares under Restricted Share Plan19,308 26,518 - 477,017 - -
702019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Directors’ report
Fair value of Long Term Variable Reward awards made during the year
The table below provides a summary of the fair value of LTVR awards granted to the CEO and Group Executives
during 2019 calculated in accordance with AASB 2 Share-based Payment and is used for accounting purposes only.
LTVR awards will only vest if performance hurdles are achieved and service conditions are met in future years.
Plan nameGranted to
Performance
hurdleGrant date
Commencement
date
1
Test dateExpiry
Fair value
2
per
instrument
CEO Long Term
Variable Reward Plan
Brian HartzerRelative TSR12 December
2018
1 October 20181 October 20221 October 2033$10.45
Cash ROE12 December
2018
1 October 20181 October 20211 October 2033$19.03
Westpac Long Term
Variable Reward Plan
Group
Executives
Relative TSR12 December
2018
1 October 20181 October 20221 October 2033$10.45
Cash ROE12 December
2018
1 October 20181 October 20211 October 2033$19.03
7.4. Details of Westpac equity holdings of Non-executive Directors
The table below sets out details of relevant interests in Westpac ordinary shares held by Non-executive Directors
(including their related parties) during the year ended 30 September 2019
3
.
Number held atChangesNumber held at
Namestart of the yearduring the yearend of the year
Current Non-executive Directors
Lindsay Maxsted22,0951,58523,680
Nerida Caesar9,9853,59813,583
Ewen Crouch
4
82,264 - 82,264
Alison Deans14,392 - 14,392
Craig Dunn8,869 - 8,869
Anita Fung - - -
Steven Harker
5
n/a10,36511,930
Peter Marriott
6
41,072(2,001)39,071
Peter Nash8,020 - 8,020
Margaret Seale
5,7
n/a 1,068 37,439
Former Non-executive Director
Peter Hawkins
5
15,880-n/a
1. The commencement date is the start of the performance period.
2. The fair values of performance share rights granted during the year have been independently calculated at their respective grant
dates based on the requirements of AASB 2 Share-based Payment. The fair value of performance share rights with cash ROE hurdles
has been assessed with reference to the share price at grant date and a discount rate reflecting the expected dividend yield over
their vesting periods which for the performance share rights valued at $19.03 is four years to the 1 October 2022 vesting date. For
the purpose of allocating performance share rights with cash ROE hurdles, the valuation also takes into account the average cash
ROE outcome using a Monte Carlo pricing simulation model. The fair value of performance share rights with hurdles based on TSR
performance relative to that of a group of comparator companies also takes into account the average TSR outcome determined using a
Monte Carlo simulation pricing model.
3. Other than as disclosed below, no share interests include non-beneficially held shares.
4. Ewen Crouch holds 42,000 ordinary shares following the grant of probate in a deceased estate for which he is one of the executors. In
addition to holdings of ordinary shares, Ewen Crouch and his related parties held interests in 250 Westpac Capital Notes 2 at year end.
5. The information relates to the period the individual was a KMP. Refer to section 1 for further details.
6. Peter Marriott’s related party ceased to hold an interest in 2,001 ordinary shares following the realisation of assets in a deceased estate.
In addition to holdings of ordinary shares, Peter Marriott and his related parties held interests in 563 Westpac Capital Notes 2
at year end.
7. In addition to holding shares, Margaret Seale and her related parties held interests in 3,220 Westpac Capital Notes 2 at year end.
1. The highest number of shares held by an individual in the table is 0.0043% of total Westpac ordinary shares outstanding as at
30 September 2019.
2. The information relates to the period the individual was a KMP. Refer to section 1 for further details.
1
2
3
4
712019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Directors’ report
7.5. Details of Westpac equity holdings of Executive Key Management Personnel
The table below details Westpac equity held (and movement in that equity) by the CEO and Group Executives
(including their related parties) for the year ended 30 September 2019
1
.
Name
Type of equity-based
instrument
Number
held at
start of
the year
Number
granted
during the
year as
remuneration
Received
on exercise
and/or
exercised
during the
year
Number
forfeited
or lapsed
during the
year
Other
changes
during the
year
Number
held at end
of the year
Number
vested and
exercisable
at end of
the year
Managing Director & Chief Executive Officer
Brian HartzerOrdinary shares109,611 41,867 - - - 151,478 -
CEO Performance share
rights732,817 227,338 - (119,476)- 840,679 -
Performance share rights34,263 - - (34,263)- - -
Current Group Executives
Craig Bright
2
Ordinary sharesn/a132,151 - - - 132,151 -
Performance share rightsn/a77,696 - - - 77,696 -
Lyn CobleyOrdinary shares91,993 18,724 - - - 110,717 -
Performance share rights261,846 94,964 - - - 356,810 -
Peter King Ordinary shares97,791 20,796 - - - 118,587 -
Performance share rights314,259 92,086 - (65,787)- 340,558 -
Rebecca LimOrdinary shares30,876 14,340 - - - 45,216 -
Performance share rights144,092 62,948 - (13,823)- 193,217 -
David LindbergOrdinary shares64,952 17,719 - - - 82,671 -
Performance share rights254,369 94,602 - (29,489)- 319,482 -
Carolyn McCannOrdinary shares49,435 9,818 - - - 59,253 -
Performance share rights42,816 49,910 - (14,178)- 78,548 -
David McLeanOrdinary shares9,613 - - - - 9,613 -
Performance share rights237,918 84,630 - (35,662)- 286,886 2,148
Unhurdled share rights57,218 22,059 - - - 79,277 49,831
Christine ParkerOrdinary shares27,431 17,196 - - (15,000)29,627 -
Performance share rights240,311 73,380 - (53,168)- 260,523 -
David StephenOrdinary shares- 135,929 - - - 135,929 -
Performance share rights- 278,698 - - - 278,698 -
Gary ThursbyOrdinary shares92,445 15,909 - - - 108,354 -
Performance share rights154,553 76,438 - (17,013)- 213,978 -
Alastair Welsh
2
Ordinary sharesn/a4,223 - - (20,802)37,256 -
Performance share rightsn/a- - - - 14,944-
Former Group Executives
Brad Cooper
2
Ordinary shares131,982 16,090 - - - n/a-
Performance share rights329,216 94,424 - (74,436)- n/a-
Dave Curran
2
Ordinary shares49,425 - - - - n/a-
Performance share rights288,436 - - (63,519)- n/a-
George Frazis
2
Ordinary shares81,302 19,308 - - (10,000)n/a-
Performance share rights300,880 89,928 - (58,231)- n/a-
722019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Directors’ report
7.6. Loans to Non-executive Directors and Executive Key Management Personnel disclosures
Financial instrument transactions that occurred during the financial year between Directors, the CEO or Group
Executives and the Group are in the ordinary course of business on terms and conditions (including interest and
collateral) as they apply to other employees and certain customers. These transactions consisted principally of
normal personal banking and financial investment services.
The table below details loans to Non-executive Directors, the CEO and Group Executives (including their related
parties) of the Group.
Balance at start of
the year
$
Interest paid and
payable for the year
$
Interest not charged
during the year
$
Balance at end of
the year
$
Number in Group at
end of the year
Non-executive Directors3,544,610306,091 - 19,785,1624
CEO and Group Executives9,519,382366,076 - 11,932,84510
13,063,992672,167 - 31,718,00714
The table below details KMP (including their related parties) with loans above $100,000 during 2019.
Balance at start of
the year
$
Interest paid and
payable for the year
$
Interest not charged
during the year
$
Balance at end of
the year
$
Highest
indebtedness during
the year
$
Directors
Lindsay Maxsted1,572,88971,630 - 2,666,9792,666,979
Ewen Crouch979,94739,833 - 928,7811,479,947
Steven Harker
1
n/a158,722 - 15,000,00015,000,000
Peter Nash991,77435,906 - 1,189,4021,498,923
CEO and Group Executives
Brian Hartzer9,84715,572 - 806,470814,285
Lyn Cobley2,000,00085,800 - 2,000,0002,007,287
Brad Cooper
1
2,791,36073,973 - n/a3,097,569
Rebecca Lim732,84513,081 - 600,000778,035
Carolyn McCann145,0004,788 - 307,697440,001
David McLean620,84130,059 - 625,816672,004
Christine Parker1,308,48646,955 - 5,001,8665,436,523
David Stephen-3,112--672,755
Gary Thursby1,911,00373,462-1,864,7912,034,797
Alastair Welsh
1
n/a19,274 - 726,205726,205
1. The information relates to the period the individual was a KMP. Refer to section 1 for further details.
732019 Westpac Group Annual Report
1
2
3
4
Directors’ report
Directors’ report
11. Auditor
a) Auditor’s independence declaration
A copy of the auditor’s independence declaration as required under section 307C of the Corporations Act is below:
PricewaterhouseCoopers, ABN 52 780 433 757
One International Towers Sydney, Watermans Quay, Barangaroo NSW 2000, GPO BOX 2650 Sydney
NSW 2001
T: +61 2 8266 0000, F: +61 2 8266 9999, www.pwc.com.au,
Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.
Auditor’s Independence Declaration
As lead auditor for the audit of Westpac Banking Corporation for the year-ended 30
September 2019, I declare that to the best of my knowledge and belief, there have been:
(a) no contraventions of the auditor independence requirements of the
Corporations
Act 2001
in relation to the audit; and
(b) no contraventions of any applicable code of professional conduct in relation to the
audit.
This declaration is in respect of Westpac Banking Corporation and the entities it controlled
during the period.
Lona Mathis Sydney
Partner
PricewaterhouseCoopers
4 November 2019
742019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Directors’ report
b) Non-audit services
We may decide to engage PwC on assignments additional to their statutory audit duties where their expertise or
experience with Westpac or a controlled entity is important.
Details of the non-audit service amounts paid or payable to PwC for non-audit services provided during the 2018
and 2019 financial years are set out in Note 39 and Note 35 to the respective financial statements.
PwC also provides audit and non-audit services to non-consolidated entities, non-consolidated trusts of which a
Westpac Group entity is trustee, manager or responsible entity and non-consolidated superannuation funds or
pension funds. The fees in respect of these services were approximately $7.5 million in total (2018: $7.5 million).
PwC may also provide audit and non-audit services to other entities in which Westpac holds a minority interest and
which are not consolidated. Westpac is not aware of the amount of any fees paid to PwC by those entities.
Westpac has a policy on engaging PwC, details of which are set out in Westpac’s Corporate Governance Statement
and in the subsection entitled ‘Engagement of the external auditor’, which forms part of this Directors’ report.
The Board has considered the position and, in accordance with the advice received from the Board Audit
Committee, is satisfied that the provision of the non-audit services during 2019 by PwC is compatible with the
general standard of independence for auditors imposed by the Corporations Act. The Directors are satisfied, in
accordance with advice received from the Board Audit Committee, that the provision of non-audit services by
PwC, as set out above, did not compromise the auditor independence requirements of the Corporations Act for the
following reasons:
• all non-audit services provided by PwC for the year have been reviewed by the Board Audit Committee, which
is of the view that they do not impact the impartiality and objectivity of PwC; and
• based on Board quarterly independence declarations made by PwC to the Board Audit Committee during
the year, none of the services undermine the general principles relating to auditor independence including
reviewing or auditing PwC’s own work, acting in a management or a decision-making capacity for the company,
acting as advocate for the company or jointly sharing economic risk and rewards.
12. Responsibility statement
The Directors of Westpac Banking Corporation confirm that to the best of their knowledge:
• the consolidated financial statements for the financial year ended 30 September 2019, which have been
prepared in accordance with the accounting policies described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial
statements, being in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards (AAS), give a true and fair view of the
assets, liabilities, financial position and profit of the Group; and
• the Annual Report from the section entitled ‘Information on Westpac’ to and including the section entitled
‘Other Westpac business information’ includes a fair review of the information required by the Disclosure
Guidance and Transparency Rules 4.1.8R to 4.1.11R of the United Kingdom Financial Conduct Authority, together
with a description of the principal risks and uncertainties faced by the Group.
Signed in accordance with a resolution of the Board.
Lindsay Maxsted Brian Hartzer
Chairman Managing Director & Chief Executive Officer
4 November 2019 4 November 2019
Directors’ report
752019 Westpac Group Annual Report
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
Five year summary
Reading this report
Review of Group operations
Divisional performance
Risk and risk management
Westpac’s approach to sustainability
Other Westpac business information
02
762019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Five year summary
1
(in $m unless otherwise indicated)20192018201720162015
Income statements for the years ended 30 September
2
Net interest income16,907 16,505 15,516 15,148 14,267
Net fee income1,655 2,424 2,603 2,611 2,808
Net wealth management and insurance income1,029 2,061 1,800 1,899 2,228
Trading income929 945 1,202 1,124 964
Other income
129 72 529 59 1,241
Net operating income before operating expenses and
impairment charges20,649 22,007 21,650 20,841 21,508
Operating expenses(10,106)(9,566)(9,282)(9,073)(9,339)
Impairment charges
(794)(710)(853)(1,124)(753)
Profit before income tax9,749 11,731 11,515 10,644 11,416
Income tax expense(2,959)(3,632)(3,518)(3,184)(3,348)
Profit attributable to non-controlling interests
(6)(4)(7)(15)(56)
Net profit attributable to owners of Westpac Banking Corporation6,784 8,095 7,990 7,445 8,012
Balance sheet as at 30 September
2
Loans714,770 709,690 684,919 661,926 623,316
Other assets191,856 169,902 166,956 177,276 188,840
Total assets906,626 879,592 851,875 839,202 812,156
Deposits and other borrowings563,247 559,285 533,591 513,071 475,328
Debt issues181,457 172,596 168,356 169,902 171,054
Loan capital21,826 17,265 17,666 15,805 13,840
Other liabilities74,589 65,873 70,920 82,243 98,019
Total liabilities841,119 815,019 790,533 781,021 758,241
Total shareholders’ equity and non-controlling interests65,507 64,573 61,342 58,181 53,915
Key financial ratios
Shareholder value
Dividends per ordinary share (cents)174 188 188 188 187
Dividend payout ratio (%)
3
88.83 79.52 79.28 84.19 73.39
Return on average ordinary equity (%)10.65 13.05 13.65 13.32 16.23
Basic earnings per share (cents)196.5 237.5 238.0 224.6 255.0
Net tangible assets per ordinary share ($)
4
15.36 15.39 14.66 13.90 13.02
Share price ($):
High30.05 33.68 35.39 33.74 40.07
Low23.30 27.24 28.92 27.57 29.10
Close29.64 27.93 31.92 29.51 29.70
Business performance
Operating expenses to operating income ratio (%)48.94 43.47 42.87 43.53 43.42
Net interest margin (%)2.12 2.13 2.06 2.10 2.09
Capital adequacy
Total equity to total assets (%)7.2 7.3 7.2 6.9 6.6
Total equity to total average assets (%)7.3 7.4 7.2 7.0 6.8
APRA Basel III:
Common equity Tier 1 (%)10.67 10.63 10.56 9.48 9.50
Tier 1 ratio (%)12.84 12.78 12.66 11.17 11.38
Total capital ratio (%)15.63 14.74 14.82 13.11 13.26
Credit quality
Net impaired assets to equity and collectively assessed provisions (%)1.41 1.14 1.29 1.79 1.80
Total provisions for expected credit losses/impairment on loans and
credit commitments to total loans (basis points)
5
54 43 45 54 53
Other information
Full time equivalent employees (number at financial year end)
6
33,288 35,029 35,096 35,580 35,484
1. Where accounting classifications have changed or where changes in accounting policy are adopted retrospectively, comparatives have
been restated and may differ from results previously reported.
2. The above income statement extracts for 2019, 2018 and 2017 and balance sheet extracts for 2019 and 2018 are derived from the
consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report. The above income statement extracts for 2016 and 2015 and balance
sheet extracts for 2017, 2016 and 2015 are derived from financial statements previously published.
3. Adjusted for Treasury shares.
4. Total equity attributable to owners of Westpac Banking Corporation, after deducting intangible assets divided by the number of
ordinary shares outstanding, less Treasury shares held.
5. Provisions for expected credit losses (ECL) for the 30 September 2019 year end have been determined based on AASB 9 Financial
Instruments (December 2014) (AASB 9). Comparatives based on AASB 139 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement (AASB
139) have not been restated. Refer to Note 1 and Note 13 to the financial statements for further details.
6. Full-time equivalent employees include full-time, pro-rata part-time, overtime, temporary and contract staff.
Five year summary
1
772019 Westpac Group Annual Report
1
2
3
4
Reading this report
1
2
3
4
Reading this report
Disclosure regarding forward-looking statements
This Annual Report contains statements that constitute ‘forward-looking statements’ within the meaning of
Section 21E of the US Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Forward-looking statements are statements about matters that are not historical facts. Forward-looking statements
appear in a number of places in this Annual Report and include statements regarding Westpac’s intent, belief
or current expectations with respect to its business and operations, market conditions, results of operations
and financial condition, including, without limitation, future loan loss provisions and financial support to certain
borrowers. Words such as ‘will’, ‘may’, ‘expect’, ‘intend’, ‘seek’, ‘would’, ‘should’, ‘could’, ‘continue’, ‘plan’, ‘estimate’,
‘anticipate’, ‘believe’, ‘probability’, ‘risk’, ‘aim’ or other similar words are used to identify forward-looking statements.
These forward-looking statements reflect Westpac’s current views with respect to future events and are subject to
change, certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions which are, in many instances, beyond Westpac’s control, and
have been made based upon management’s expectations and beliefs concerning future developments and their
potential effect upon Westpac. There can be no assurance that future developments will be in accordance with
Westpac’s expectations or that the effect of future developments on Westpac will be those anticipated. Actual
results could differ materially from those expected, depending on the outcome of various factors, including, but
not limited to:
• the effect of, and changes in, laws, regulations, taxation or accounting standards or practices and government
policy, particularly changes to liquidity, leverage and capital requirements;
• regulatory investigations and other actions, inquiries, litigation, fines, penalties, restrictions or other regulator
imposed conditions, including as a result of our actual or alleged failure to comply with laws (such as financial
crime laws), regulations or regulatory policy;
• internal and external events which may adversely impact Westpac’s reputation;
• information security breaches, including cyberattacks;
• reliability and security of Westpac’s technology and risks associated with changes to technology systems;
• the stability of Australian and international financial systems and disruptions to financial markets and any losses
or business impacts Westpac or its customers or counterparties may experience as a result;
• market volatility, including uncertain conditions in funding, equity and asset markets;
• adverse asset, credit or capital market conditions;
• an increase in defaults in credit exposures because of a deterioration in economic conditions;
• the conduct, behaviour or practices of Westpac or its staff;
• changes to Westpac’s credit ratings or the methodology used by credit rating agencies;
• levels of inflation, interest rates (including low or negative rates), exchange rates and market and monetary
fluctuations;
• market liquidity and investor confidence;
• changes in economic conditions, consumer spending, saving and borrowing habits in Australia, New Zealand
and other countries (including as a result of tariffs and protectionist trade measures) in which Westpac or its
customers or counterparties conduct their operations and Westpac’s ability to maintain or to increase market
share, margins and fees, and control expenses;
• the effects of competition, including from established providers of financial services and from non-financial
services entities, in the geographic and business areas in which Westpac conducts its operations;
• the timely development and acceptance of new products and services and the perceived overall value of these
products and services by customers;
• the effectiveness of Westpac’s risk management policies, including internal processes, systems and employees;
• the incidence or severity of Westpac-insured events;
• the occurrence of environmental change (including as a result of climate change) or external events in countries
in which Westpac or its customers or counterparties conduct their operations;
• changes to the value of Westpac’s intangible assets;
• changes in political, social or economic conditions in any of the major markets in which Westpac or its
customers or counterparties operate;
• the success of strategic decisions involving diversification or innovation, in addition to business expansion
activity, business acquisitions and the integration of new businesses; and
• various other factors beyond Westpac’s control.
The above list is not exhaustive. For certain other factors that may impact on forward-looking statements made
by Westpac, refer to ‘Risk factors’ under the section ‘Risk and risk management’. When relying on forward-looking
statements to make decisions with respect to Westpac, investors and others should carefully consider the
foregoing factors and other uncertainties and events.
Westpac is under no obligation to update any forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report,
whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, after the date of this Annual Report.
782019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Reading this report
Significant developments
For a discussion of significant developments impacting the Group, refer to ‘Significant developments’ under
‘Information on Westpac’ in Section 1.
Currency of presentation, exchange rates and certain definitions
In this Annual Report, ‘financial statements’ means our audited consolidated balance sheets as at 30 September 2019
and 30 September 2018 and income statements, statements of comprehensive income, changes in equity and cash
flows for each of the years ended 30 September 2019, 2018 and 2017 together with accompanying notes which are
included in this Annual Report.
Our financial year ends on 30 September. As used throughout this Annual Report, the financial year ended
30 September 2019 is referred to as 2019 and other financial years are referred to in a corresponding manner.
We publish our consolidated financial statements in Australian dollars. In this Annual Report, unless otherwise
stated or the context otherwise requires, references to ‘dollars’, ‘dollar amounts’, ‘$’, ‘AUD’ or ‘A$’ are to Australian
dollars, references to ‘US$’, ‘USD’ or ‘US dollars’ are to United States dollars and references to ‘NZ$’, ‘NZD’ or
‘NZ dollars’ are to New Zealand dollars. Solely for the convenience of the reader, certain Australian dollar
amounts have been translated into US dollars at a specified rate. These translations should not be construed as
representations that the Australian dollar amounts actually represent such US dollar amounts or have been or
could be converted into US dollars at the rate indicated. Unless otherwise stated, the translations of Australian
dollars into US dollars have been made at the rate of A$1.00 = US$0.6746, the noon buying rate in New York City
for cable transfers in Australian dollars as certified for customs purposes by the Federal Reserve Bank of New
York (the ‘noon buying rate’) as of Monday, 30 September 2019. The Australian dollar equivalent of New Zealand
dollars at 30 September 2019 was A$1.00 = NZ$1.0790, being the closing spot exchange rate on that date. Refer to
‘Exchange rates’ in Section 4 for information regarding the rates of exchange between the Australian dollar and the
US dollar for the financial years ended 30 September 2015 to 30 September 2019.
Any discrepancies between totals and sums of components in tables contained in this Annual Report are due to
rounding.
Reading this report
792019 Westpac Group Annual Report
1
2
3
4
Review of Group operations
1
2
3
4
Selected consolidated financial and operating data
We have derived the following selected financial information as of, and for the financial years ended, 30 September
2019, 2018, 2017, 2016 and 2015 from our audited consolidated financial statements and related notes.
This information should be read together with our audited consolidated financial statements and the accompanying
notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report.
Accounting standards
The financial statements and other financial information included elsewhere in this Annual Report, unless otherwise
indicated, have been prepared and presented in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards (AAS).
Compliance with AAS ensures that the financial statements also comply with International Financial Reporting
Standards (IFRS) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB).
The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the accounting policies described in the Notes to
the financial statements.
Recent accounting developments
For a discussion of recent accounting developments refer to Note 1 to the financial statements.
Critical accounting estimates
Our reported results are sensitive to the accounting policies, assumptions and estimates that underlie the
preparation of the income statement and the balance sheet. Note 1(b) includes details of the areas of our critical
accounting assumptions and estimates and a reference to the relevant note in the financial statements providing
further information. Each of the assumptions and estimates have been discussed at our Board Audit Committee
(BAC). The following is a summary of the areas involving our most critical accounting estimates.
Provisions (other than loan impairment charges)
Provisions are held in respect of a range of obligations such as employee entitlements, litigation and non-lending
losses, impairment charges on credit commitments, surplus lease space, restructuring costs and compliance,
regulation and remediation provisions. Some of the provisions involve significant judgement about the likely
outcome of various events and estimated future cash flows. Refer to Note 27.
Provisions for expected credit losses (ECL)/impairment charges on loans
Provisions for ECL are a probability-weighted estimate of the cash shortfalls expected to result from defaults over
the relevant timeframe. They are determined by evaluating a range of possible outcomes and taking into account
the time value of money, past events, current conditions and forecasts of future economic conditions.
The models use three main components to determine the ECL (as well as the time value of money) including:
• Probability of default (PD): the probability that a counterparty will default;
• Loss given default (LGD): the loss that is expected to arise in the event of a default; and
• Exposure at default (EAD): the estimated outstanding amount of credit exposure at the time of the default.
The provisions for ECL are determined based on three stages as follows:
Stage 1: 12 months ECL - performing
For financial assets where there has been no significant increase in credit risk since origination a provision for
12 months ECL is recognised.
Stage 2: Lifetime ECL - performing
For financial assets where there has been a significant increase in credit risk since origination but where the asset is
still performing a provision for lifetime ECL is recognised.
Stage 3: Lifetime ECL – non-performing
For financial assets that are non-performing a provision for lifetime ECL is recognised. Indicators include a breach
of contract with the Group such as a default on interest or principal payments, a borrower experiencing significant
financial difficulties or observable economic conditions that correlate to defaults on a group of loans.
Determining when a financial asset has experienced a significant increase in credit risk since origination is a critical
accounting judgement which is primarily based on changes in internal customer risk grades since origination of
the facility. The change in the internal customer risk grade that the Group uses to represent a significant increase
in credit risk is based on a sliding scale. This means that a higher credit quality exposure at origination would
require a more significant downgrade compared to a lower credit quality exposure before it is considered to have
experienced a significant increase in credit risk.
Interest income is calculated based on the gross carrying amount of financial assets in stages 1 and 2 of the Group’s
ECL model and on the carrying amount net of the provision for ECL for financial assets in stage 3.
The measurement of ECL for each stage and the assessment of significant increase in credit risk consider
information about past events and current conditions as well as reasonable and supportable projections of future
events and economic conditions. The estimation of forward looking information is a critical accounting judgement.
The Group considers three future macroeconomic scenarios including a base case scenario along with upside and
downside scenarios.
Review of Group operations
802019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Review of Group operations
The macroeconomic variables used in these scenarios, based on current economic forecasts, include (but are not
limited to) unemployment rates, real gross domestic product growth rates and residential and commercial property
price indices.
The macroeconomic scenarios are weighted based on the Group’s best estimate of the relative likelihood of each
scenario. The weighting applied to each of the three macroeconomic scenarios takes into account historical
frequency, current trends, and forward looking conditions.
As at 30 September 2019, gross loans to customers were $718,378 million (2018: $712,504 million) and the provision
for ECL/impairment charges on loans was $3,608 million (2018: $2,814 million)
1
.
Fair value of financial instruments
Financial instruments classified as held-for-trading (including derivatives) are measured at fair value through
income statement. Investment securities measured at fair value through other comprehensive income
(AASB 9)/available-for-sale (AASB 139)
2
are also recognised in the financial statements at fair value. As much as
possible, financial instruments are valued with reference to quoted, observable market prices or by using models
which employ observable valuation parameters. Where valuation models rely on parameters for which inputs are
not observable, judgements and estimation may be required.
As at 30 September 2019, the fair value of trading securities and financial assets measured at fair value
through profit or loss, investment securities measured at fair value through other comprehensive income
(2019) / available-for-sale securities (2018), loans designated at fair value and life insurance assets was
$113,989 million (2018: $94,247 million). The fair value of deposits and other borrowings at fair value, other financial
liabilities at fair value, debt issues at fair value and life insurance liabilities was $56,979 million (2018: $56,427 million).
The fair value of outstanding derivatives was a net asset of $763 million (2018: $306 million net liability). The fair
value of financial assets and financial liabilities determined by valuation models that use unobservable market prices
was $399 million (2018: $964 million) and $29 million (2018: $6 million), respectively. The fair value of financial assets
and financial liabilities, including derivatives, is largely determined based on valuation models using observable
market prices and rates. Where observable market inputs are not available, day one profits or losses are not
recognised.
We believe that the judgements and estimates used are reasonable in the current market. However, a change in
these judgements and estimates would lead to different results as future market conditions can vary from those
expected.
Goodwill
Goodwill represents the excess of purchase consideration, the amount of any non-controlling interest in the
acquiree and the acquisition date fair value of any previous equity interest in the acquiree, over the fair value of
the identified net assets of acquired businesses. The determination of the fair value of the assets and liabilities of
acquired businesses requires the exercise of management judgement. Different fair values would result in changes
to the goodwill and to the post-acquisition performance of the acquisitions.
Goodwill is tested for impairment annually by determining if the carrying value of the cash-generating unit (CGU)
that it has been allocated to is recoverable. The recoverable amount is the higher of the CGU’s fair value less
costs to sell and its value-in-use. Determination of appropriate cash flows and discount rates for the calculation
of the value in use is subjective. As at 30 September 2019, the carrying value of goodwill was $8,895 million
(2018: $8,890 million).
Superannuation obligations
The actuarial valuation of our defined benefit plan obligations are dependent upon a series of assumptions, the
key ones being price inflation, salary growth, mortality, morbidity, discount rate and investment returns. Different
assumptions could significantly alter the amount of the difference between plan assets and defined benefit
obligations and the amount recognised directly in retained profits.
The net superannuation deficit across all our plans as at 30 September 2019 was $335 million (2018: net
superannuation surplus of $64 million). As at 30 September 2019, one superannuation plan was in surplus
of $73 million (2018: two plans in surplus of $89 million) and three superannuation plans were in deficit of
$408 million (2018: two plans in deficit of $25 million).
Income taxes
The Group is subject to income taxes in Australia and jurisdictions where it has foreign operations. All our
businesses predominantly operate in jurisdictions with similar tax rates to the Australian corporate tax rate.
Significant judgement is required in determining the worldwide provision for income taxes. There are many
transactions and calculations undertaken during the ordinary course of business for which the ultimate tax
determination is uncertain. For these circumstances, we hold appropriate provisions. Where the final outcome of
these matters is different from the amounts that were initially recorded, such differences will impact the current
and deferred tax provisions in the period where such determination is made.
Life insurance contract liabilities
The actuarial valuation of life insurance contract liabilities and associated deferred policy acquisition costs are
dependent upon a number of assumptions. The key factors impacting the valuation of these liabilities and related
assets are the cost of providing benefits and administering the contracts, mortality and morbidity experience,
discontinuance experience and the rate at which projected future cash flows are discounted.
Review of Group operations
1. The provision for ECL on loans relates to the 30 September 2019 year end balance determined under AASB 9. The provision for
impairment charges on loans related to the 2018 year end balance determined under AASB 139.
2. On adoption of AASB 9, the majority of available-for-sale securities were reclassified to Investment securities measured at fair value
through other comprehensive income (FVOCI). Refer to Note 1 to the financial statements for more details.
812019 Westpac Group Annual Report
1
2
3
4
Review of Group operations
1
2
3
4
Income statement review
Consolidated income statement
1
For the years ending 30 September201920192018201720162015
(in $m unless otherwise indicated)US$
2
A$A$A$A$A$
Interest income22,412 33,222 32,571 31,232 31,822 32,295
Interest expense(11,007)(16,315)(16,066)(15,716)(16,674)(18,028)
Net interest income11,405 16,907 16,505 15,516 15,148 14,267
Net fee income1,116 1,655 2,424 2,603 2,611 2,808
Net wealth management and insurance income694 1,029 2,061 1,800 1,899 2,228
Trading income627 929 945 1,202 1,124 964
Other income88 129 72 529 59 1,241
Net operating income before operating expenses and
impairment charges13,930 20,649 22,007 21,650 20,841 21,508
Operating expenses(6,817)(10,106)(9,566)(9,282)(9,073)(9,339)
Impairment charges(536)(794)(710)(853)(1,124)(753)
Profit before income tax6,577 9,749 11,731 11,515 10,644 11,416
Income tax expense(1,996)(2,959)(3,632)(3,518)(3,184)(3,348)
Net profit for the year4,581 6,790 8,099 7,997 7,460 8,068
Net profit attributable to non-controlling interests(5)(6)(4)(7)(15)(56)
Net profit attributable to owners of Westpac Banking
Corporation4,576 6,784 8,095 7,990 7,445 8,012
Weighted average number of ordinary shares (millions)3,450 3,450 3,406 3,355 3,313 3,140
Basic earnings per ordinary share (cents)132.6 196.5 237.5 238.0 224.6 255.0
Diluted earnings per share (cents)
3
127.8 189.5 230.1 229.3 217.8 248.2
Dividends per ordinary share (cents)117174188 188 188 187
Dividend payout ratio (%)
4
88.83 88.83 79.52 79.28 84.19 73.39
Overview of performance – 2019 v 2018
During 2019, Westpac adopted AASB 9 Financial Instruments (AASB 9) and AASB 15 Revenue from Contracts with
Customers (AASB 15). As the Group chose to apply the standards prospectively, comparatives have not been restated.
Adopting the new standards has resulted in measurement and classification differences between 2019 and prior
years. The significant differences are:
• the measurement of credit loss provision and impairment charges are now on an expected loss basis;
• line fees (mainly in Business) are now recognised in net interest income, previously most was recognised in net
fee income;
• interest on performing loans is now measured on the gross loan value. Previously, interest was recognised on
the loan balance net of impairment provision; and
• certain items previously netted are now presented on a gross basis, including payments from credit card
schemes which were previously netted against related expenditure.
The changes have little impact on net profit but a more significant impact on individual line items. As these
changes have only been applied from 1 October 2018, it is difficult to compare some line items across years. These
changes are discussed further in Section 3, Note 1.
Net profit attributable to owners of Westpac Banking Corporation for 2019 was $6,784 million, a decrease of
$1,311 million or 16% compared to 2018. 2019 included significant increases in provisions for estimated customer
refunds, payments, associated costs, and litigation, along with costs associated with restructuring of the wealth
business, which together reduced net profit after tax by $1,130 million. These items are discussed further in Note
27 to the financial statements. A summary of the impact of provisions for estimated customer refunds, payments,
associated costs, and litigation and wealth restructuring costs split across income statement line items is shown in
the ‘Divisional performance’ section.
Net interest income increased $402 million or 2% compared to 2018 driven by an increase of $686 million due to
the reclassification of line fees from net fee income to interest income, partly offset by $239 million increase in
provisions for estimated customer refunds, payments, associated costs, and litigation. Excluding the impact of
these items, net interest income was flat compared to 2018. Average interest earning assets grew 3% primarily from
Australian and New Zealand housing, offset by a lower margin. Reported net interest margin decreased 1 basis
point to 2.12%.
1. Where accounting classifications have changed or where changes in accounting policy are adopted retrospectively, comparatives have
been restated and may differ from results previously reported.
2. Australian dollar amounts have been translated into US dollars solely for the convenience of the reader at the rate of A$1.00 = US$0.6746
(refer to ‘Reading this report’ section).
3. Based on basic earnings per share, with the weighted average number of fully paid ordinary shares outstanding adjusted for the conversion of
dilutive potential ordinary shares, issued for no consideration, and after adjusting earnings for distributions on dilutive potential ordinary shares.
4. Adjusted for Treasury shares.
822019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Review of Group operations
Net fee income decreased $769 million or 32% compared to 2018 primarily due to the reclassification of line fees to
net interest income ($667 million in 2018) and $126 million increase in provisions for estimated customer refunds,
payments, associated costs and litigation.
Net wealth management and insurance income decreased $1,032 million or 50% compared to 2018 primarily
due to additional provisions for estimated customer refunds, payments, associated costs, and litigation of $531
million, higher general insurance claims from severe weather events $69 million, cessation of grandfathered advice
commissions $42 million, lower wealth management income due to changes in platform pricing structure, and exit
of the Hastings business in 2018.
Trading income decreased $16 million or 2% compared to 2018. The decline mainly relates to a change in
methodology in derivative valuation adjustments partially offset by higher non-customer income.
Other income is up $57 million or 79% compared to 2018, primarily due to the non-repeat of a 2018 impairment
charge on an equity holding of $104 million.
Operating expenses increased $540 million or 6% compared to 2018. The increase was mainly due to a $349
million increase in provisions for estimated customer refunds, payments, associated costs, and litigation and wealth
reset, higher technology expenses of $174 million, a rise in regulatory, compliance and investment related spend
of $170 million, partially offset by the exit of the Hastings business in 2018 of $158 million and a net productivity
benefit.
Impairment charges were $84 million or 12% higher compared to 2018. Asset quality remained sound, with stressed
exposures as a percentage of total committed exposures at 1.20%, up 12 basis points over the year.
The effective tax rate of 30.4% in 2019 was lower than the 2018 effective tax rate of 31.0%. The lower effective tax
rate in 2019 reflects a decrease in non-deductible expenses from the non-repeat of the 2018 goodwill write-off
associated with the exit of Hastings.
The Board has determined a final dividend of 80 cents per ordinary share. The full year ordinary dividends of 174
cents is lower than the ordinary dividends declared in 2018 and represents a pay-out ratio of 88.83%. The full year
ordinary dividend is fully franked.
Income statement review – 2019 v 2018
Net interest income – 2019 v 2018
$m201920182017
Interest income33,222 32,571 31,232
Interest expense(16,315)(16,066)(15,716)
Net interest income16,907 16,505 15,516
Increase/(decrease) in net interest income
Due to change in volume397 648 855
Due to change in rate5 341 (487)
Change in net interest income402
989 368
Net interest income increased $402 million or 2% compared to 2018. Key features include:
• 3% growth in average interest-earning assets, primarily from Australian and New Zealand housing and higher
third party liquids;
• Group net interest margin decreased 1 basis point to 2.12%. Refer to Interest spread and margin – 2019 v 2018 for
primary drivers of margin movement.
832019 Westpac Group Annual Report
1
2
3
4
Review of Group operations
1
2
3
4
Loans increased $5.1 billion or 1% compared to 2018. Excluding foreign currency translation impacts, loans
increased $2.9 billion.
Key features of loan growth were:
• Australian housing loans increased $4.5 billion or 1% with $60.6 billion of new lending partially offset by
$56.1 billion of run off. Owner occupied balances grew 3% and comprised 58% of the portfolio, while investor
property lending decreased 1%;
• Australian personal loans decreased $1.8 billion or 8%, across personal lending, credit cards and auto finance.
Demand for unsecured lending continued to decline in 2019 with our experience in line with the market;
• Australian business and institutional loans decreased $2.0 billion or 1%, mostly due to lower institutional
property lending as divisions prioritised returns over growth, partially offset by growth in agricultural lending;
• Australian provision balances increased $0.8 billion or 32% at the start of the year mostly from the
implementation of AASB 9 on 1 October 2018 , which calculates credit loss provisioning on an expected loss
basis; and
• New Zealand lending increased A$4.4 billion or 6%. Housing loans grew 7%, mostly in fixed rate products and
business lending increased 6%, supported by growth in agricultural, and property lending. This was partially
offset by a decline personal lending and credit cards.
Deposits and other borrowings excluding certificates of deposit increased $6.8 billion or 1% compared to 2018.
Excluding foreign currency translation impacts, deposits and other borrowings excluding certificates of deposit
increased $4.7 billion.
Key features of deposits and other borrowings excluding certificates of deposit growth were:
• Australian deposits and other borrowings excluding certificates of deposit increased $2.4 billion or 1%, mostly
from an increase in savings and transactional deposits, partially offset by a reduction in term deposits. Non-
interest bearing deposits were up 4% from increased mortgage offset balances; and
• New Zealand deposits and other borrowings excluding certificates of deposit increased A$3.1 billion or 5%,
as term deposits were up 4% and interest bearing transactional deposits were up 12%. Non-interest bearing
deposits increased 18%, from growth in business and consumer transactional deposits.
Certificates of deposit decreased $2.8 billion or 7%, reflecting reduced short-term wholesale funding issuance in
this form.
Interest spread and margin – 2019 v 2018
$m201920182017
Group
Net interest income16,907 16,505 15,516
Average interest earning assets798,924 774,944 752,294
Average interest bearing liabilities734,282 715,509 694,924
Average net non-interest bearing assets, liabilities and equity64,642 59,435 57,370
Interest spread
1
1.94% 1.95% 1.89%
Benefit of net non-interest bearing assets, liabilities and equity
2
0.18% 0.18% 0.17%
Net interest margin
3
2.12% 2.13% 2.06%
Group net interest margin of 2.12% decreased 1 basis point from 2018. Key features include:
• Provisions for estimated customer refunds, payments, associated costs, and litigation contributed to a reduction
in margin of 3 basis points;
• 11 basis points increase from the adoption of AASB 15 and AASB 9 primarily related to the reclassification of line
fees from net fee income to net interest income and the measurement of interest on performing loans based on
the gross loan value; and
• Except for these items, net interest margin decreased 9 basis points driven by:
• Changes in short term wholesale funding rates having little impact with the average cost being similar in 2018
and 2019 despite the sharp reduction in bank bill swap rate (BBSW) in the second half of 2019;
• Loan spreads were little changed, with the impact from changes to pricing of Australian variable mortgages
being offset by competition, retention pricing and changes in the mix of the mortgage portfolio with
customers switching from interest only to principal and interest;
• 2 basis point decrease from lower customer deposit spreads due to broad based competition and the impact
from lower interest rates, particularly in the second half of 2019; and
• 2 basis point decrease from liquidity primarily due to increased balances of third party liquid assets.
• Treasury & Markets contribution decreased 5 basis points due to lower Treasury revenue from interest rate
risk management (3 basis points), and fair value adjustments (2 basis points).
1. Interest spread is the difference between the average yield on all interest earning assets and the average yield on all interest bearing
liabilities.
2. The benefit of net non-interest bearing assets, liabilities and equity is determined by applying the average yield paid on all interest
bearing liabilities to the average level of net non-interest bearing funds as a percentage of average interest earning assets.
3. Net interest margin is calculated by dividing net interest income by average interest earning assets.
842019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Review of Group operations
Non-interest income - 2019 v 2018
$m201920182017
Net fee income1,655 2,424 2,603
Net wealth management and insurance income1,029 2,061 1,800
Trading income929 945 1,202
Other income129 72 529
Non-interest income3,742 5,502 6,134
Non-interest income decreased $1,760 million or 32% compared to 2018. Key features include:
• $657 million decrease from provisions for estimated customer refunds, payments, associated costs, and
litigation;
• $508 million decrease from the adoption of AASB 15 primarily related to the reclassification of line fees from
net fee income to net interest income ($667 million) and reclassification of certain items previously netted that
are now presented on a gross basis (up $159 million);
• Exit of Hastings business in 2018 ($203 million); and
• Except for these items, non-interest income decreased by $392 million due to reduced net wealth management
and insurance income and lower trading income.
Net fee income decreased $769 million or 32%, including $126 million additional provisions for estimated customer
refunds, payments, associated costs, and litigation mostly related to financial planning, reclassification of line fees
from non-interest income to net interest income as a result of the adoption of AASB 15 to more appropriately
reflect the relationship with drawn lines of credit (down $667 million) and the reclassification of certain items
previously netted that are now presented on a gross basis including card scheme support payments (up $153
million).
Except for these items, net fee income decreased $129 million or 6% mainly from:
• Lower advice income following the exit of financial planning (down $76 million);
• Lower revenue from payments and transaction fees (down $34 million) driven by increased merchant costs and
lower account based fees in New Zealand following the decision to simplify certain consumer fees; and
• A decrease in business lending and mortgage fees largely due to reduced new lending volumes (down
$27 million); partly offset by
• Higher corporate and institutional lending fees largely from syndication fees generated in the first half of 2019
(up $10 million).
Net wealth management and insurance income decreased $1,032 million or 50% compared to 2018, including
additional provisions for estimated customer refunds, payments, associated costs, and litigation (mostly related to
financial planning) of $531 million. Additionally, there was no contribution from Hastings, following the exit of the
business in 2018 (down $203 million).
Except for these items, net wealth management and insurance income decreased $298 million, mainly from:
• Insurance income decreased $139 million from:
–A reduction in general insurance income (down $69 million) from higher claims, including the New South
Wales hailstorm and Queensland floods;
–A reduction in life insurance income (down $39 million) following the implementation of regulatory reforms
(“Protect Your Super”) and higher claims and movement in policyholder tax recoveries (down $23 million); and
–Lower LMI income (down $8 million) primarily from a reduction in loans written at higher LVR bands.
• Lower Platforms and Superannuation income (down $98 million) primarily driven by margin compression from
full year impact of platform repricing, implementation of regulatory reforms (‘Protect your Super’), product mix
changes and outflows in legacy platforms. This has been partly offset by an 89% increase in BT Panorama funds
to $23 billion due to inflows and higher asset markets; and
• Cessation of grandfathered commission payments (down $42 million).
Trading income decreased $16 million or 2% compared to 2018, primarily driven by the derivative valuation
adjustment (down $78 million) partially offset by higher non-customer income.
Other income increased $57 million or 79% compared to 2018, reflecting the impairment loss on the remaining
Pendal shares in 2018 that did not repeat ($104 million), higher gains from asset sales and revaluation of a Fintech
investment ($98 million), partially offset by loss on financial instruments measured at fair value ($100 million), lower
rental income from operating leases ($35 million) and the impact of hedging future earnings (down $19 million).
852019 Westpac Group Annual Report
1
2
3
4
Review of Group operations
1
2
3
4
Operating expenses – 2019 v 2018
$m201920182017
Staff expenses5,0384,887 4,701
Occupancy expenses1,023 1,033 1,073
Technology expenses2,3192,110 2,008
Other expenses1,7261,536 1,500
Total operating expenses10,106 9,566 9,282
Total operating expenses to net operating income ratio48.94% 43.47% 42.87%
Operating expenses increased $540 million or 6% compared to 2018. Key features include:
• increased costs associated with the Wealth Reset ($241 million higher);
• estimated costs associated with implementing customer refunds and payments and litigation ($108 million
higher);
• an increase due to the reclassification of $238 million predominantly related to merchant and card schemes
from non-interest income to operating expenses; and
• reduced costs from the exit of the Hastings business ($158 million).
Except for these items, operating expenses increased $111 million, primarily driven by regulatory and compliance
costs ($99 million higher) and investment related spend ($71 million higher) with productivity offsetting underlying
cost growth.
Staff expenses increased $151 million or 3% compared to 2018. This was due to costs associated with the Wealth
Reset and estimated costs associated with implementing customer refunds and payments and litigation ($231
million higher). Except for these items, staff expenses decreased $80 million primarily due to a 5% decrease in
FTE from productivity initiatives related to organisation simplification and channel optimisation along with lower
variable reward. This was partly offset by annual salary increases and the Group’s investment programs having a
higher proportion of spend expensed during the year.
Occupancy expenses decreased $10 million or 1% compared to 2018, driven by the reduction in branch numbers
(down 61), the exit of 4 corporate sites and the removal of 375 ATMs. This was partly offset by annual rental
increases and costs associated with branch and ATM rationalisation.
Technology expenses increased $209 million or 10%. This was due to costs associated with the Wealth Reset
and estimated costs associated with implementing customer refunds and payments and litigation ($35 million
higher). Except for these items, technology expenses increased $174 million largely due to higher amortisation of
software assets ($91 million higher) as key platforms became operational, including the Customer Service Hub, New
Payments Platform and Panorama.
Other expenses increased $190 million or 12%. This was due to costs associated with the Wealth Reset and
estimated costs associated with implementing customer refunds and payments and litigation ($83 million higher).
Except for these items, expenses increased $107 million from increased professional services costs primarily related
to regulatory and compliance activity on Financial Crime, data privacy, product and system simplification and risk
management, and higher marketing expenses, partly offset by lower costs associated with the exit of Hastings
business ($111 million lower) and the Royal Commission
862019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Review of Group operations
Impairment charges – 2019 v 2018
$m201920182017
Impairment charges794 710 853
Impairment charges to average gross loans (basis points)
11 10 13
Asset quality remained sound through 2019 with stressed exposures to total committed exposures increasing by
12 basis points to 1.20%. The increase in stressed exposures was due to higher impaired and higher 90+ days but
not impaired facilities. Emerging stress is mostly from an increase in mortgage delinquencies due to the softening
of economic activity and falling house prices.
Given modest change in asset quality, impairment charges have remained low at $794 million in 2019, equal to
11 basis points of gross loans.
Impairment charges for 2019 of $794 million were up $84 million when compared to 2018.
Key movements included:
• The introduction of AASB9 required the removal of the recognition of the time value of money on performing
collective provisions which contributed $115 million increase in impairment charges; and
• Write-offs, included in non-performing provisions, were $95 million higher principally in Australian unsecured
lending portfolios including Auto finance and from increases in customers utilising hardship; partially offset by
• Non performing provisions relating to new individually assessed provisions (IAPs) were $28 million lower due to
lower provisions required in the Business division and New Zealand, partially offset by an increase in WIB; and
• A higher economic overlay release of $96 million 2019 (2018: $22 million). Refer to Note 13.
Income tax expense – 2019 v 2018
$m201920182017
Income tax expense2,959 3,632 3,518
Tax as a percentage of profit before income tax expense (effective tax rate)30.35% 30.96% 30.55%
The effective tax rate of 30.4% in 2019 was lower than the 2018 effective tax rate of 31.0%. The lower effective
tax rate in 2019 reflects a decrease in non-deductible expenses which included penalties and the non-repeat of
the 2018 write-off of the Hastings goodwill associated with the exit of that business which was non-deductible.
The effective tax rate above the Australian corporate tax rate of 30% reflects several Tier 1 Instruments whose
distributions are not deductible for Australian taxation purposes.
872019 Westpac Group Annual Report
1
2
3
4
Review of Group operations
1
2
3
4
Balance sheet review
Selected consolidated balance sheet data
1
The detailed components of the balance sheet are set out in the notes to the financial statements.
201920192018201720162015
As at 30 September US$m
2
A$mA$mA$mA$mA$m
Cash and balances with central banks13,532 20,059 26,788 18,786 17,397 15,135
Collateral paid4,000 5,930 4,787 5,716 8,205 8,137
Trading securities and financial assets measured at
fair value through income statement and investment
securities/available-for-sale securities70,956 105,182 84,251 86,693 82,841 83,231
Derivative financial instruments20,143 29,859 24,101 24,033 32,227 48,173
Loans482,184 714,770 709,690 684,919 661,926 623,316
Life insurance assets6,319 9,367 9,450 10,643 14,192 13,125
All other assets14,476 21,459 20,525 21,085 22,414 21,039
Total assets611,610 906,626 879,592 851,875 839,202 812,156
Collaterial received2,217 3,287 2,184 2,477 1,784 4,045
Deposits and other borrowings379,966 563,247 559,285 533,591 513,071 475,328
Other financial liabilities19,708 29,215 28,105 30,799 28,704 30,671
Derivative financial instruments19,628 29,096 24,407 25,375 36,076 48,304
Debt issues122,411 181,457 172,596 168,356 169,902 171,054
Life insurance liabilities4,977 7,377 7,597 9,019 12,361 11,559
All other liabilities3,788 5,614 3,580 3,250 3,318 3,440
Total liabilities excluding loan capital552,695 819,293 797,754 772,867 765,216 744,401
Loan capital14,724 21,826 17,265 17,666 15,805 13,840
Total liabilities567,419 841,119 815,019 790,533 781,021 758,241
Net assets44,191 65,507 64,573 61,342 58,181 53,915
Total equity attributable to owners of Westpac Banking
Corporation44,155 65,454 64,521 61,288 58,120 53,098
Non-controlling interests36 53 52 54 61 817
Total shareholders’ equity and non-controlling interests44,191 65,507 64,573 61,342 58,181 53,915
Average balances
Total assets603,581 894,724 873,310 854,058 831,439 791,719
Loans and other receivables
3
469,009 695,240 681,201 657,628 631,266 596,378
Total equity attributable to owners of Westpac
Banking Corporation42,981 63,714 62,017 58,556 55,896 49,361
Non-controlling interests34 50 31 20 575 854
1. Where accounting classifications have changed or where changes in accounting policy are adopted retrospectively, comparatives have
been restated and may differ from results previously reported.
2. Australian dollar amounts have been translated into US dollars solely for the convenience of the reader at the rate of
A$1.00 = US$0.6746 (refer to ‘Reading this report’ section).
3. Includes interest earning balances. Effective from 1 October 2018, loans and other receivables are net of Stage 3 provisions to reflect the
adoption of AASB 9. For prior years, loans and receivables are net of provisions for impairment charges on loans (refer to Note 9 of the
financial statements). Other receivables include cash and balances with central banks and other interest earning assets.
882019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Review of Group operations
Summary of consolidated ratios
As at 30 September201920192018201720162015
(in $m unless otherwise indicated)US$
1
A$A$A$A$A$
Profitability ratios (%)
Net interest margin
2
2.12 2.12 2.13 2.06 2.10 2.09
Return on average assets
3
0.76 0.76 0.93 0.94 0.90 1.01
Return on average ordinary equity
4
10.65 10.65 13.05 13.65 13.32 16.23
Return on average total equity
5
10.64 10.64 13.05 13.64 13.18 15.96
Capital ratios (%)
Average total equity to average total assets7.13 7.13 7.10 6.86 6.79 6.34
Common equity Tier 110.67 10.67 10.63 10.56 9.48 9.50
Tier 1 ratio12.84 12.84 12.78 12.66 11.17 11.38
Total capital ratio15.63 15.63 14.74 14.82 13.11 13.26
Earning ratios
Basic earnings per ordinary share (cents)
6
132.6 196.5 237.5 238.0 224.6 255.0
Diluted earnings per ordinary share (cents)
7
127.8 189.5 230.1 229.3 217.8 248.2
Dividends per ordinary share (cents)117174.0188 188 188 187
Dividend payout ratio (%)88.8388.83 79.52 79.28 84.19 73.39
Credit quality ratios
Loans written off (net of recoveries)662 982 948 1,488 1,052 1,107
Loans written off (net of recoveries) to average loans (bps)14 14 14 22 16 18
Balance sheet review
Assets – 2019 v 2018
Total assets as at 30 September 2019 were $906.6 billion, an increase of $27.0 billion or 3% compared to
30 September 2018. Significant movements during the year included:
• cash and balances with central banks decreased $6.7 billion or 25% reflecting lower liquid assets held in this
form;
• collateral paid increased $1.1 billion or 24% mainly due to an increase in collateralised derivative liabilities;
• trading securities and financial assets measured at fair value through income statement (FVIS), available-for-
sale securities and investment securities increased $20.9 billion or 25% reflecting higher liquid assets held in this
form;
• derivative assets increased $5.8 billion or 24% mainly driven by movements in cross currency swaps, foreign
currency forward contracts and interest rate swaps; and
• loans grew $5.1 billion or 1%. Refer to loan quality – 2019 v 2018 below for further information.
Liabilities and equity – 2019 v 2018
Total liabilities as at 30 September 2019 were $841.1 billion, an increase of $26.1 billion or 3% compared to
30 September 2018. Significant movements during the year included:
• collateral received increased $1.1 billion or 51% due to an increase in collateralised derivative assets;
• deposits and other borrowings increased $4.0 billion or 1%;
• other financial liabilities increased $1.1 billion or 4% mainly driven by securities sold under agreements to
repurchase and interbank deposits, partially offset by decreases in accrued interest payable and other financial
liabilities;
• derivative liabilities increased $4.7 billion or 19% driven by movements in cross currency swaps and interest rate
swaps;
• debt issues increased $8.9 billion or 5% ($1.8 billion or 1% decrease excluding foreign currency translation
impacts, fair value and hedge accounting adjustments); and
• loan capital increased $4.6 billion or 26% mainly due to $3.2 billion net issuance of Tier 2 capital instruments in
response to APRA’s Total Loss Absorbing Capital announcement and $1.3 billion impact of hedging and foreign
currency translation.
1. Australian dollar amounts have been translated into US dollars solely for the convenience of the reader at the rate of A$1.00 = US$0.6746
(refer to ‘Reading this report’ section).
2. Calculated by dividing net interest income by average interest earning assets.
3. Calculated by dividing net profit attributable to owners of Westpac Banking Corporation by average total assets.
4. Calculated by dividing net profit attributable to owners of Westpac Banking Corporation by average ordinary equity.
5. Calculated by dividing net profit attributable to owners of Westpac Banking Corporation by average ordinary equity and
non-controlling interests.
6. Based on the weighted average number of fully paid ordinary shares.
7. Based on basic earnings per share, with the weighted average number of fully paid ordinary shares outstanding adjusted for the
conversion of dilutive potential ordinary shares, issued for no consideration, and after adjusting earnings for distributions on dilutive
potential ordinary shares.
892019 Westpac Group Annual Report
1
2
3
4
Review of Group operations
1
2
3
4
Equity attributable to owners of Westpac Banking Corporation increased $0.9 billion or 1% reflecting retained
profits and shares issued under the 2019 interim dividend reinvestment plan (DRP) and 2018 final DRP, partially
offset by $0.7 billion opening retained earnings adjustment due to the adoption of new accounting standards and
dividends paid during the year.
Loan quality – 2019 v 2018
1
As at 30 September
$m201920182017
Total gross loans
1
718,378 712,504 687,785
Average gross loans
Australia622,241 611,398 588,920
New Zealand78,065 73,000 72,269
Other overseas16,615 16,228 12,837
Total average gross loans716,921 700,626 674,026
Total gross loans represented 79% of the total assets of the Group as at 30 September 2019, 2% lower compared
with 30 September 2018. The decrease was mainly due to greater holdings of liquid assets and movements in cross
currency swaps and interest rate swaps.
Australian average gross loans were $622.2 billion in 2019, an increase of $10.8 billion or 2% from $611.4 billion in
2018. This increase was primarily due to growth in housing loans.
New Zealand average gross loans were A$78.1 billion in 2019, an increase of A$5.1 billion or 7% from A$73.0 billion
in 2018. Excluding foreign currency translation impacts, New Zealand average gross loans grew A$2.7 billion or
4%. The growth was mostly from fixed rate housing loans and business lending, partially offset by lower personal
lending and credit cards.
Other overseas average loans were $16.6 billion in 2019, an increase of $0.4 billion or 2% from $16.2 billion in 2018.
This was primarily due to the depreciation of AUD against USD.
Approximately 14% of the loans at 30 September 2019 mature within one year and 17% mature between one year
and five years. Retail lending comprises the majority of the loan portfolio maturing after five years.
Housing and personal loans that were past due, can be disaggregated based on days overdue at 30 September
2019 as follows:
Consolidated20192018
$m30-89 days90+ daysTotal30-89 days90+ daysTotal
Loans
Loans - housing3,5744,0637, 6 373,1333,2716,404
Loans - personal395356751427371798
Total3,9694,4198,3883,5603,6427,202
Impaired exposures
2,3
As at 30 September
$m20192018201720162015
Impaired exposures
Housing and business loans:
Gross1,3271,019 1,142 1,851 1,593
Provisions(534)(458)(507)(885)(689)
Net793 561 635 966 904
Personal loans greater than 90 days past due:
Gross405 371 373 277 263
Provisions(248)(189)(195)(166)(172)
Net157 182 178 111 91
Restructured:
Gross31 26 27 31 39
Provisions(10)(6)(12)(16)(16)
Net21 20 15 15 23
Net impaired exposures971 763 828 1,092 1,018
Provisions for ECL/impairment on loans and credit commitments
Individually assessed provisions412 422 480 869 669
Collectively assessed provisions3,5012,631 2,639 2,733 2,663
Total provisions for ECL/impairment on loans and credit commitments3,913 3,053 3,119 3,602 3,332
Loan quality
Total provisions for ECL/impairment charges on impaired exposures to total impaired
exposures
3
44.92%46.12%46.30%49.42%46.28%
Gross impaired exposures to total gross loans0.25%0.20%0.22%0.32%0.30%
Total provisions for ECL/impairment on loans and credit commitments to gross loans0.54%0.43%0.45%0.54%0.53%
Total provisions for ECL/impairment on loans and credit commitments to gross impaired
exposures222.0%215.6%202.3%166.8%175.8%
1. Gross loans are stated before related provision for ECL/impairment charges on loans and credit commitments.
2. The Group has adopted AASB9 and AASB15 from 1 October 2018. Comparatives have not been restated. Refer to Note 1 for further detail.
3. Impaired provisions relating to impaired loans include IAP plus the proportion of the CAP that relates to impaired loans. The proportion
of the CAP that relates to impaired loans was $380 million as at 30 September 2019 (2018: $231 million, 2017: $234 million, 2016:
$198 million, 2015: $208 million). This sum is compared to the total gross impaired loans to determine this ratio.
902019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Review of Group operations
The credit quality remained sound over 2019, with total stressed exposures to TCE increasing by 12 basis points to
1.20%. Total impaired exposures as a percentage of total gross loans were 0.25% at 30 September 2019, an increase
of 0.05% from 0.20% at 30 September 2018.
At 30 September 2019, we had one impaired counterparty with exposure greater than $50 million, accounting for
4% of total impaired loans. This compares to one impaired counterparty with exposure greater than $50 million in
2018 accounting for 4% of total impaired loans. There was one impaired counterparty at 30 September 2019 that
was less than $50 million and greater than $20 million (2018: two impaired counterparties).
At 30 September 2019, 79% of our exposure was to either investment grade or secured consumer mortgage
segment (2018: 79%, 2017: 78%, 2016: 78%, 2015: 77%) and 96% of our exposure as at 30 September 2019 was in
Australia, New Zealand and the Pacific region (2018: 95%, 2017: 96%, 2016: 96%, 2015: 95%).
We believe that Westpac remains appropriately provisioned. Total impairment provisions for impaired exposure to
total impaired exposure coverage at 44.9% at 30 September 2019 compared to 46.1% at 30 September 2018. Total
provisions for ECL on loans and credit commitments to total impaired exposures represented 222.0% of total impaired
loans as at 30 September 2019, up from 215.6%
1
at 30 September 2018. Total provisions for ECL on loans and credit
commitments to total loans were 0.54% at 30 September 2019, up from 0.43%
1
at 30 September 2018 (2017: 0.45%)
1
.
Group mortgage loans 90 days past due at 30 September 2019 were 0.82% of outstandings, up from 0.67% of
outstandings at 30 September 2018 (2017: 0.62%).
Group other consumer loan delinquencies (including credit card and personal loan products) were 1.69% of
outstandings as at 30 September 2019, up from 1.64% of outstandings as at 30 September 2018 (2017: 1.57%).
Potential problem loans as at 30 September 2019 amounted to $1,297 million, a decrease of 23% from $1,691 million
at 30 September 2018. The decrease in potential problem loans was mainly due to the downgrade of a Institutional
counterparty to impaired over the year.
Potential problem loans are facilities that are performing and no loss is expected, but the customer demonstrates
significant weakness in debt servicing or security cover that could jeopardise repayment of debt on current terms if
not rectified. Potential problem loans are identified using established credit frameworks and policies, which include
the ongoing monitoring of facilities through the use of watchlists.
Capital resources
APRA measures an ADI’s regulatory capital using three measures:
• Common Equity Tier 1 Capital (CET1) comprises the highest quality components of capital that consists of
paid-up share capital, retained profits and certain reserves, less certain intangible assets, capitalised expenses
and software, and investments and retained profits in insurance and funds management subsidiaries that are
not consolidated for capital adequacy purposes;
• Tier 1 Capital being the sum of CET1 and Additional Tier 1 Capital. Additional Tier 1 Capital comprises high
quality components of capital that consist of certain securities not included in CET1, but which include loss
absorbing characteristics; and
• Total Regulatory Capital being the sum of Tier 1 Capital and Tier 2 Capital. Tier 2 Capital includes subordinated
instruments and other components of capital that, to varying degrees, do not meet the criteria for Tier 1 Capital,
but nonetheless contribute to the overall strength of an ADI and its capacity to absorb losses.
Under APRA’s Prudential Standards, Australian ADIs, including Westpac, are required to maintain a minimum CET1
ratio of at least 4.5%, Tier 1 Capital ratio of at least 6.0% and Total Regulatory Capital ratio of at least 8.0%. APRA
may also require ADIs, including Westpac, to meet Prudential Capital Requirements (PCRs) above the minimum
capital ratios. APRA does not allow the PCRs for individual ADIs to be disclosed.
APRA also requires ADIs to hold additional CET1 buffers comprising of:
• a capital conservation buffer (CCB) of 3.5% for ADIs designated by APRA as domestic systemically important
banks (D-SIBs) unless otherwise determined by APRA, which includes a 1.0% surcharge for D-SIBs. APRA has
determined that Westpac is a D-SIB; and
• a countercyclical capital buffer. The countercyclical buffer is set on a jurisdictional basis and APRA is
responsible for setting the requirement in Australia. The countercyclical buffer requirement is currently set to
zero for Australia and New Zealand.
Collectively, the above buffers are referred to as the “Capital Buffer” (CB). Should the CET1 capital ratio fall
within the capital buffer range restrictions on the distributions of earnings will apply. This includes restrictions
on the amount of earnings that can be distributed through dividends, Additional Tier 1 Capital distributions and
discretionary staff bonuses.
1. The provisions for impairment charges on loans and credit commitments were determined under AASB139.
912019 Westpac Group Annual Report
1
2
3
4
Review of Group operations
1
2
3
4
Capital actions
While Westpac’s CET1 capital ratio is above APRA’s ‘unquestionably strong’ benchmark of 10.5%, the Group’s lower
cash earnings, new operational risk capital overlays and changes in the calculation of risk weighted assets has
impacted the Group’s capital generation over the year. Given our priority for balance sheet strength and our goal
to support customer growth, we are seeking to raise approximately $2.5 billion in capital to provide an increased
buffer above APRA’s unquestionably strong benchmark. The raising also creates flexibility for changes in capital
rules and potential litigation or regulatory action. The raising is expected to lift the Group’s CET1 ratios by around
46-58
1
basis points.
Capital management strategy
Westpac’s approach to capital management seeks to ensure that it is adequately capitalised as an ADI. Westpac
evaluates its approach to capital management through an Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process (ICAAP),
the key features of which include:
• the development of a capital management strategy, including consideration of regulatory minimums, capital
buffers and contingency plans;
• consideration of both economic and regulatory capital requirements;
• a stress testing framework that challenges the capital measures, coverage and requirements including the
impact of adverse economic scenarios; and
• consideration of the perspectives of external stakeholders, including rating agencies and equity and debt investors.
In light of APRA’s ‘unquestionably strong’ capital benchmarks, Westpac will seek to operate with a CET1 capital
ratio above 10.5% in March and September as measured under the existing capital framework. Additional buffers
may also be held to reflect challenging or uncertain environments. This also takes into consideration:
• Current regulatory capital minimums and the capital conservation buffer (CCB), which together are the total
CET1 requirement
2
;
• Stress testing to calibrate an appropriate buffer against a downturn; and
• Quarterly volatility of capital ratios due to the half yearly cycle of ordinary dividend payments.
Westpac will revise its target capital level once APRA finalises its review of the capital adequacy framework.
Total regulatory capital developments
On 9 July 2019 APRA announced that it will require the major banks (including Westpac) to lift Total Regulatory
Capital by three percentage points of RWA by 1 January 2024 in order to boost loss absorbing capacity and
support orderly resolution. APRA also confirmed that its overall long term target of an additional four to five
percentage points of loss absorbing capacity remains unchanged, and that it will consider the most feasible
alternative method of sourcing the remaining one to two percentage points, taking into account the particular
characteristics of the Australian financial system.
Further details of APRA’s regulatory changes are set out in the Significant Developments section of the 2019
Annual Report.
1. Based on risk weighted assets as at 30 September 2019, a 46 basis point increase reflects the impact of the placement only of $2
billion, while a 58 basis point increase reflects the impact of both the placement and the share purchase plan, assuming the share
purchase plan raises $500 million (the basis point impacts are net of issue costs).
2. Noting that APRA may apply higher CET1 requirements for an individual ADI.
922019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Review of Group operations
Basel Capital Accord
APRA’s Prudential Standards are generally consistent with the International Regulatory Framework for Banks,
also known as Basel III, issued by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS), except where APRA has
exercised certain discretions. On balance, the application of these discretions acts to reduce capital ratios reported
under APRA’s Prudential Standards relative to the BCBS approach and to those reported in some other jurisdictions.
Westpac is accredited by APRA to apply advanced models permitted by the Basel III global capital adequacy
regime to the measurement of its regulatory capital requirements. Westpac uses the Advanced Internal Ratings
Based approach for credit risk, the Advanced Measurement Approach (AMA) for operational risk and the internal
model approach for Interest Rate Risk in the Banking Book (IRRBB).
Westpac’s Level 2 regulatory capital ratios as at 30 September are summarised in the table below. As the table
summarises Westpac’s Level 2 regulatory capital structure, the capital amounts shown are not the same as the
Westpac Group’s consolidated financial statements. Westpac’s Pillar 3 Report provides further details regarding
Westpac’s capital structure.
Westpac’s Level 2 regulatory capital ratios as at 30 September are summarised in the table below. Westpac’s Pillar
3 Report provides further details regarding Westpac’s capital structure.
$m20192018
Common equity64,320 63,576
Deductions from common equity(18,568)(18,337)
Total common equity after deductions45,75245,239
Additional Tier 1 capital9,299 9,144
Net Tier 1 regulatory capital55,05154,383
Tier 2 capital12,226 8,565
Deductions from Tier 2 capital(255)(233)
Total Tier 2 capital after deductions11,9718,332
Total regulatory capital67,0 2 262,715
Credit risk367,864362,749
Market risk9,3506,723
Operational risk47,68039,113
Interest rate risk in the banking book53012,989
Other assets3,370 3,810
Total risk weighted assets428,794425,384
Common Equity Tier 1 capital ratio10.67%10.63%
Additional Tier 1 capital ratio2.17%2.15%
Tier 1 capital ratio12.84%12.78%
Tier 2 capital ratio2.79%1.96%
Total regulatory capital ratio15.63%14.74%
932019 Westpac Group Annual Report
1
2
3
4
Divisional performance
1
2
3
4
Divisional performance – 2019 v 2018
On 19 March 2019, the Group announced changes to the way it supports customer’s wealth and insurance
needs, realigning its BT Financial Group (BTFG) businesses into expanded Consumer and Business divisions and
exiting the provision of personal financial advice by Westpac Group salaried financial advisers and authorised
representatives. As a result, the insurance business was transferred to Consumer, the funds management business
was transferred to Business , and the Advice business and certain support functions were transferred to Group
Businesses. Changes to the Group’s organisation structure were effective from 1 April 2019 and the results of the
operating segments for 2018 and 2017 have been restated.
Westpac reports under the following four primary customer-facing business divisions:
• Consumer:
–is responsible for sales and service of banking and financial products and services to consumer customers in
Australia;
–responsible for the Group’s Australian insurance business, which covers the manufacture and distribution of
life, general and lenders mortgage insurance; and
–operates under the Westpac, St.George, BankSA, Bank of Melbourne, RAMS and BT brands.
• Business:
–is responsible for sales and service of banking and financial products and services for SME and commercial
business customers in Australia. SME and Commercial business customers typically have facilities up to
approximately $150 million;
–is responsible for Private Wealth, serving the banking needs of high net worth customers across the banking
brands;
–is responsible for the manufacture and distribution of investments (including margin lending and equities
broking), superannuation and retirement products as well as wealth administration platforms; and
–operates under the Westpac, St.George, BankSA, Bank of Melbourne and BT brands.
• Westpac Institutional Bank:
–is responsible for delivering a broad range of financial products and services to commercial, corporate,
institutional and government customers with connections to Australia and New Zealand;
–services include financing, transactional banking, financial and debt capital markets;
–customers are supported throughout Australia, as well as via branches and subsidiaries located in New
Zealand, US, UK and Asia; and
–also responsible for Westpac Pacific, providing a range of banking services in Fiji and Papua New Guinea.
• Westpac New Zealand:
–responsible for sales and service of banking, wealth and insurance products to customers in New Zealand;
–customer base includes consumers, business and institutional customers; and
–operates under the Westpac brand for banking products, the Westpac Life brand for life insurance products
and the BT brand for wealth products.
• Group Businesses include:
–Treasury, which is responsible for the management of the Group’s balance sheet including wholesale
funding, capital and management of liquidity. Treasury also manages the interest rate risk and foreign
exchange risks inherent in the balance sheet, including managing the mismatch between Group assets and
liabilities. Treasury’s earnings are primarily sourced from managing the Group’s balance sheet and interest
rate risk, (excluding Westpac New Zealand) within set risk limits;
–Group Technology, which comprises functions for the Australian businesses, is responsible for technology
strategy and architecture, infrastructure and operations, applications development and business integration;
–Core Support, which comprises functions performed centrally, including Australian banking operations,
property services, strategy, finance, risk, compliance, legal, human resources, and customer and corporate
relations;
–Following the Group’s decision to restructure the Wealth operating segment and to exit of the Advice
business in March 2019, the remaining Advice activities (including associated remediation) and certain
support functions have been transferred to Group Businesses; and
–Group Businesses also includes earnings on capital not allocated to divisions, certain intra-group
transactions that facilitate presentation of performance of the Group’s operating segments, earnings from
non-core asset sales, earnings and costs associated with the Group’s Fintech investments, and certain other
head office items such as centrally held provisions.
The accounting standard AASB 8 Operating Segments requires segment results to be presented on a basis
that is consistent with information provided internally to Westpac’s key decision makers. In assessing financial
performance, including divisional results, Westpac Group uses a measure of performance referred to as ‘cash
earnings’. Cash earnings is viewed as a measure of the level of profit that is generated by ongoing operations and is
therefore considered in assessing distributions, including dividends. Cash earnings is neither a measure of cash flow
nor net profit determined on a cash accounting basis, as it includes both cash and non-cash adjustments to net
profit attributable to owners of Westpac Banking Corporation. Management believes this allows the Group to more
effectively assess performance for the current period against prior periods and to compare performance across
business divisions and across peer companies.
Divisional performance
942019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Divisional performance
A reconciliation of cash earnings to net profit attributable to owners of Westpac Banking Corporation for each
business division is set out in Note 2 of the Financial Statements.
To determine cash earnings, three categories of adjustments are made to statutory results:
• material items that key decision makers at the Westpac Group believe do not reflect operating performance;
• items that are not considered when dividends are recommended, such as the amortisation of intangibles,
impact of Treasury shares and economic hedging; and
• accounting reclassifications between individual line items that do not impact statutory results.
The discussion of our divisional performance in this section is presented on a cash earnings basis unless otherwise
stated. Cash earnings is not directly comparable to statutory results presented in other parts of this Annual Report.
Outlined below are the cash earnings adjustments to the reported result:
• amortisation of intangible assets: Identifiable intangible assets arising from business acquisitions are
amortised over their useful lives, ranging between four and twenty years. This amortisation (excluding
capitalised software) is a cash earnings adjustment because it is a non-cash flow item and does not affect
cash distributions available to shareholders. The last of these intangible assets were fully amortised in
December 2017;
• fair value (gain)/loss on economic hedges (which do not qualify for hedge accounting under AAS) comprise:
–the unrealised fair value (gain)/loss on foreign exchange hedges of future New Zealand earnings impacting
non-interest income is reversed in deriving cash earnings as they may create a material timing difference on
reported results but do not affect the Group’s cash earnings over the life of the hedge; and
–the unrealised fair value (gain)/loss on hedges of accrual accounted term funding transactions are reversed
in deriving cash earnings as they may create a material timing difference on reported results but do not
affect the Group’s cash earnings over the life of the hedge;
• ineffective hedges: The unrealised (gain)/loss on ineffective hedges is reversed in deriving cash earnings
because the gain or loss arising from the fair value movement in these hedges reverses over time and does not
affect the Group’s profits over time;
• adjustment related to Pendal (previously BTIM): Consistent with prior years’ treatment, this item have been
treated as a cash earnings adjustment given their size and that it does not reflect ongoing operations. The
Group has indicated that it may sell the remaining 10% shareholding in Pendal at some future date. From
September 2018, this adjustment relates to the mark to market of the shares and separation costs related to the
original sell down. Any future gain or loss on this shareholding will similarly be excluded from the calculation of
cash earnings;
• Treasury shares: Under AAS, Westpac shares held by the Group in the managed funds and life businesses are
deemed to be Treasury shares and the results of holding these shares cannot be recognised in the reported
results. In deriving cash earnings, these results are included to ensure there is no asymmetrical impact on the
Group’s profits because the Treasury shares support policyholder liabilities and equity derivative transactions
which are re-valued in determining income; and
• accounting reclassifications between individual line items that do not impact reported results comprise:
–policyholder tax recoveries: Income and tax amounts that are grossed up to comply with the AAS covering
Life Insurance Business (policyholder tax recoveries) are reversed in deriving income and taxation expense
on a cash earnings basis; and
–operating leases: Under AAS rental income on operating leases is presented gross of the depreciation of
the assets subject to the lease. These amounts are offset in deriving non-interest income and operating
expenses on a cash earnings basis.
• for Westpac, AASB 9 and AASB 15 were adopted on 1 October 2018 and as comparatives were not restated,
line item movements in our reported results are not directly comparable across periods. In order to provide
the operational trends in business, we have revised the 2018 and 2017 cash earnings comparatives as if the
standards applied on 1 October 2017, except for expected credit loss provisioning which is not feasible. These
adjustments do not impact 2018 and 2017 cash earnings but affect individual line items. These adjustments are
comprised of:
–line fees: The Group has reclassified line fees (mostly Business) from non-interest income to net interest
income to more appropriately reflect the relationship with drawn lines of credit;
–card scheme: Support payments received from Mastercard and Visa have been reclassified to non-interest
income and related expenses have been reclassified to operating expenses;
–interest carrying adjustment: Interest on performing loans (stage 1 and stage 2 loans) is now measured on
the gross loan value. Previously, interest on performing loans was recognised on the loan balance net of
provisions. This adjustment increases interest income and impairment charges;
–other fees and expenses: The Group has restated the classification of a number of fees and expenses.
This has resulted in the grossing up of net interest income, non-interest income, impairment charges and
operating expenses; and
–merchant terminal costs: Some variable costs related to Westpac’s merchant terminal business have been
reclassified between non-interest income and operating expenses.
952019 Westpac Group Annual Report
1
2
3
4
Divisional performance
1
2
3
4
The guidance provided in Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) Regulatory Guide 230 has
been followed when presenting this information.
Comparatives have also been restated for:
• recent customer migration between divisions. This includes restatements to divisional income statements and
balance sheets;
• refinement in expense allocations; and
• changes to the Group’s organisation structure following the realignment of the BTFG businesses into Consumer,
Business and Group Businesses.
Cash earnings by division
The following tables present, for each of the key divisions of our business, the cash earnings and total assets at the
end of the financial years ended 30 September 2019, 2018 and 2017. Refer to Note 2 to the financial statements for
the disclosure of our geographic and business segments and the reconciliation to net profit attributable to owners
of Westpac Banking Corporation.
$m201920182017
Consumer3,288 3,423 3,452
Business2,431 2,756 2,554
Westpac Institutional Bank1,014 1,093 1,163
Westpac New Zealand985 934 917
Group Businesses(869)(141)(24)
Total cash earnings6,849 8,065 8,062
In presenting divisional results on a management reporting basis, internal charges and transfer pricing adjustments
are included in the performance of each division reflecting the management structure rather than the legal entity
(these results cannot be compared to results for individual legal entities). Where management reporting structures
or accounting classifications have changed, financial results for comparative periods have been revised and may
differ from results previously reported.
Our internal transfer pricing frameworks facilitate risk transfer, profitability measurement, capital allocation and
business unit alignment, tailored to the jurisdictions in which we operate. Transfer pricing allows us to measure
the relative contribution of our products and divisions to the Group’s interest margin and other dimensions of
performance. Key components of our transfer pricing frameworks are funds transfer pricing for interest rate and
liquidity risk and allocation of basis and contingent liquidity costs, including capital allocation.
Additional provisions
Net profit for 2019 was impacted by additional provisions after tax of $1,130 million for:
• Estimated customer refunds and payments, associated costs, and litigation of $958 million; and
• Restructuring costs associated with the restructuring of the Wealth business of $172 million.
The tables below show the impact of the estimated customer refunds, payments, associated costs, litigation, and
restructuring costs on the divisions for 2019 and 2018. Restructuring costs associated with the restructuring of the
wealth business is only reflected in Group Business and were only incurred in 2019.
2019 WestpacWestpac
InstitutionalNew ZealandGroup
$mConsumerBusinessBank($A)BusinessesGroup
Net interest income(85)(246)– (13)– (344)
Non-interest income(2)(55)– (4)(759)(820)
Benefits/(expenses)25 (87)– (15)(384)(461)
Core earnings(62)(388)– (32)(1,143)(1,625)
Tax and non-controlling interests29 118 – 9 339 495
Cash earnings(33)(270)– (23)(804)(1,130)
2018 WestpacWestpac
InstitutionalNew ZealandGroup
$mConsumerBusinessBank($A)BusinessesGroup
Net interest income(99)– – (2)(4)(105)
Non-interest income(12)– – (11)(140)(163)
Expenses(39)(5)– (3)(65)(112)
Core earnings(150)(5)– (16)(209)(380)
Tax and non-controlling interests36 – – 4 59 99
Cash earnings(114)(5)– (12)(150)(281)
962019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Divisional performance
Consumer
Consumer is responsible for sales and service to consumer customers in Australia. Consumer is also responsible
for the Group’s insurance business which covers the manufacture and distribution of life, general and lenders
mortgage insurances. The division also uses a third party to manufacture certain general insurance products.
Banking products are provided under the Westpac, St.George, BankSA, Bank of Melbourne, and RAMS brands,
while insurance products are provided under Westpac and BT brands. Consumer works with Business and WIB in
the sales, service, and referral of certain financial services and products including superannuation, platforms, auto
lending and foreign exchange. The revenue from these products is mostly retained by the product originators.
Financial performance
$m201920182017
Net interest income7,942 7,850 7,733
Non-interest income1,141 1,311 1,351
Net operating income before operating expenses and impairment charges9,083 9,161 9,084
Operating expenses(3,817)(3,774)(3,548)
Impairment charges(581)(486)(600)
Profit before income tax4,685 4,901 4,936
Income tax expense(1,397)(1,478)(1,484)
Cash earnings for the year3,288 3,423 3,452
Net cash earnings adjustments– (15)(116)
Net profit attributable to owners of Westpac Banking Corporation3,288 3,408 3,336
$bn $bn $bn
Deposits and other borrowings209.3 206.2 196.2
Net loans388.5 385.4 370.3
Total assets399.2 395.6 381.8
Total operating expenses to net operating income ratio42.02%41.20%39.06%
2019 v 2018
Cash earnings were 4% lower from a decline in non-interest income mainly reflecting weather related general
insurance claims, and an increased impairment charge. Cash earnings also benefited from a reduction in provisions
for estimated customer refunds, payments, associated costs and litigation.
Net interest income
up $92 million, 1%
• Lending increased 1% with growth in mortgages, partly offset by a decline in other personal
lending and higher provisions associated with the adoption of AASB 9. The decline in
personal lending was due to a 6% reduction in cards and lower personal loans;
• A 4% rise in transaction accounts, and 5% increase in savings accounts supported the 2% rise
in deposits. Term deposits were 6% lower; and
• Net interest margin was down 3 basis points. The decline was due to lower mortgage spreads
from increased competition and changes in mortgage mix with less interest only lending. The
decline was partly offset by mortgage repricing late in 2018.
Non-interest
income down $170
million, 13%
• The decline was mostly due to lower insurance income down ($116 million), from higher
weather related claims ($70 million), and lower life insurance income related to the impact of
the Protecting Your Super legislation and from higher claims; and
• Lower fee income from a contraction in net interchange fees and reduced transaction
volumes across banking products.
Operating
expenses up $43
million, 1%
• Operating expenses benefited from the reversal of provisions raised for estimated associated
costs and litigation in respect to customer refunds and payments, a benefit of $25 million,
compared to a charge of $39 million in 2018. Excluding the benefit of this turnaround,
operating expenses were up 3%;
• The rise was due to higher investment related costs including for the customer service hub,
and costs associated with regulatory change projects; and
• Higher costs from annual salary reviews and inflation based increases were more than offset
by productivity gains of $125 million mostly from organisational redesign, rationalisation of
57 branches and 349 ATMs, and further use of digital channels, all of which contributed to a
reduction in FTE. Lower variable remuneration also contributed.
Impairment
charges up $95
million, 20%
• Credit quality remains sound, although stress was higher with stressed exposures to TCE at
0.81% up 16 basis points consistent with the deterioration in the operating environment;
• Mortgage 90+ day delinquencies were up 16 basis points to 0.90% while other consumer 90+
day delinquencies were up 25 basis points; and
• Impairment charges were higher driven by the rise in delinquencies.
972019 Westpac Group Annual Report
1
2
3
4
Divisional performance
1
2
3
4
Business
Business provides business banking and wealth facilities and products for customers across Australia. Business is
responsible for manufacturing and distributing facilities to SME and Commercial business customers (including
Agribusiness) generally for up to $150 million in exposure. SME customers include relationship managed and
non-relationship managed SME customers (generally between $100k-$250k facilities). The division offers a
wide range of banking products and services to support their borrowing, payments and transaction needs. In
addition, specialist services are provided for cash flow finance, trade finance, automotive and equipment finance
and property finance. The division is also responsible for Private Wealth and the manufacture and distribution of
investments (including margin lending and equities broking), superannuation and retirement products as well as
wealth administration platforms. Business operates under the Westpac, St.George, BankSA, Bank of Melbourne, and
BT brands. Business works with Consumer and WIB in the sale, referral and service of select financial services and
risk management products (including corporate superannuation, foreign exchange and interest rate hedging). The
revenue from these products is mostly retained by the product originators.
Financial performance
$m201920182017
Net interest income5,092 5,284 4,950
Non-interest income1,464 1,640 1,617
Net operating income before operating expenses and impairment charges6,556 6,924 6,567
Operating expenses(2,805)(2,651)(2,548)
Impairment charges(272)(321)(369)
Profit before income tax3,479 3,952 3,650
Income tax expense(1,048)(1,196)(1,096)
Cash earnings for the year2,431 2,756 2,554
Net cash earnings adjustments(45)(76)150
Net profit attributable to owners of Westpac Banking Corporation2,386 2,680 2,704
$bn $bn $bn
Deposits and other borrowings147.8 143.8 137.9
Net loans173.0 173.6 169.4
Total assets187.4 188.2 183.7
Total operating expenses to net operating income ratio42.79%38.29%38.80%
2019 v 2018
Cash earnings of $2,431 million were $325 million (or 12%) lower than 2018 with performance impacted by
provisions for estimated customer refunds and payments and associated costs of $270 million after tax. Excluding
these provisions, cash earnings were $60 million or 2% lower from a reduction in non-interest income and increased
regulatory expenditure, partially offset by an increase in net interest margin and a reduction in impairment charges.
Net interest income
down $192 million,
4%
• Lending was largely flat with growth in business lending offset by slower new auto lending;
• Deposits increased 3% mostly in transaction and at call balances. These gains were partly
offset by a 4% decline in term deposits; and
• Net interest margin declined 12 basis points with provisions for customer refunds and
payments ($246 million) contributing 15 basis points to the decline. Excluding this impact, the
net interest margin was up 3 basis points from loan repricing, partly offset by lower deposit
spreads and a shift in the mortgage mix from interest only to principal and interest.
Non-interest
income down $176
million, 11%
• Provisions for estimated customer refunds and payments of $55 million contributed to a
decrease in non-interest income. Excluding these provisions, non-interest income was down
$121 million or 7% mostly due to:
–A reduction in merchant income due to changes in scheme charges; and
–Lower wealth income ($85 million) from platform margin compression due to new
platform pricing, product mix changes, the cessation of grandfathered commission
payments and implementation of Protecting Your Super reforms.
Operating
expenses up $154
million, 6%
• Provisions for estimated costs of $87 million, to implement the division’s remediation
program, was one of the main drivers increasing expenses. Excluding these costs, expenses
were up 3% due to;
–Higher regulatory and compliance costs as well as increased amortisation of investments
and wealth project costs; and
–Other cost increases, mostly salary rises, were largely offset by lower variable reward and
productivity benefits including operating model simplification and continued digitisation
and product simplification.
Impairment
charges down $49
million, 15%
• The level of stressed exposures increased 24 basis points from increased Commercial stressed
exposures across a broad number of industries; and
• Impairment charges decreased from lower individual and collective provisions.
982019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Divisional performance
Westpac Institutional Bank
Westpac Institutional Bank (WIB) delivers a broad range of financial products and services to commercial,
corporate, institutional and government customers operating in, or with connections to Australia and New Zealand.
WIB operates through dedicated industry relationship and specialist product teams, with expert knowledge in
financing, transactional banking, and financial and debt capital markets. Customers are supported throughout
Australia and via branches and subsidiaries located in New Zealand, the US, UK and Asia. WIB is also responsible
for Westpac Pacific providing a full range of banking services in Fiji and PNG. WIB works with all the Group’s
divisions in the provision of markets related financial needs including foreign exchange and fixed interest solutions.
Financial performance
$m201920182017
Net interest income1,443 1,442 1,354
Non-interest income1,292 1,565 1,716
Net operating income before operating expenses and impairment charges2,735 3,007 3,070
Operating expenses(1,284)(1,449)(1,358)
Impairment (charges)/benefits(46)16 (79)
Profit before income tax1,405 1,574 1,633
Income tax expense(386)(476)(463)
Profit attributable to non-controlling interests(5)(5)(7)
Cash earnings for the year1,014 1,093 1,163
Net cash earnings adjustments– – –
Net profit attributable to owners of Westpac Banking Corporation1,014 1,093 1,163
$bn $bn $bn
Deposits and other borrowings101.3 104.9 92.2
Net loans75.4 77.4 74.8
Total assets98.0 102.5 103.3
Total operating expenses to net operating income ratio46.95%48.19%44.23%
2019 v 2018
Cash earnings of $1,014 million was $79 million (or 7%) lower compared to 2018, primarily from a $78 million
movement in derivative valuation adjustments, no contribution from Hastings and a $62 million increase in
impairment charges. The exit of Hastings in 2018 had a $17 million impact on cash earnings but had a more
significant impact on the movements in individual line items. In 2018 Hastings added $203 million to non-interest
income, $158 million to expenses and $29 million to tax.
Net interest income
up $1 million, flat
• Net loans were 3% lower reflecting a focus on return. This included a decline in property
lending;
• Deposits were 3% lower, mostly from a reduction in government balances; and
• Net interest margin down 1 basis point from lower deposits spreads and a change in funding
mix, partly offset by higher loan spreads consistent with the return focus.
Non-interest
income down $273
million, 17%
• Excluding Hastings (2018 $203 million; 2019 nil), non-interest income was down $70 million,
or 5%, from:
–A $78 million movement in derivative valuation adjustment (a $14 million benefit in 2018 to
a $64 million charge in 2019); and
–Partly offset by increase in syndication fees from some large transactions in 2019.
Operating
expenses
down $165 million,
11%
• Excluding Hastings (2018 $158 million; 2019 nil), expenses were down $7 million, or 1%, from
–Productivity benefits from organisation redesign (FTE down 8%) and lower variable
reward costs; and
–Partly offset by higher regulatory, risk and compliance costs, particularly related to
updated requirements for the new Banking Code of Practice and responding to regulator
requests.
Impairment charge
of $46 million
(compared to
a benefit of $16
million in FY18)
• Credit quality remains sound with stressed exposures to TCE of 0.68%. This was up 2 basis
point over the year but remains low in historical terms; and
• Impairment charges were higher due to provisions associated with the migration of two long
standing stressed exposures into impaired.
992019 Westpac Group Annual Report
1
2
3
4
Divisional performance
1
2
3
4
1. Refers to total customer deposits in this table.
Westpac New Zealand
Westpac New Zealand is responsible for sales and service of banking, wealth and insurance products for consumers,
business and institutional customers in New Zealand. Westpac conducts its New Zealand banking business through
two banks in New Zealand: Westpac New Zealand Limited, which is incorporated in New Zealand and Westpac
Banking Corporation (New Zealand Branch), which is incorporated in Australia. Westpac New Zealand operates via
an extensive network of branches and ATMs across both the North and South Islands. Business and institutional
customers are also served through relationship and specialist product teams. Banking products are provided
under the Westpac brand while insurance and wealth products are provided under Westpac Life and BT brands,
respectively. New Zealand also maintains its own infrastructure, including technology, operations and treasury.
Financial performance
NZ$m201920182017
Net interest income1,967 1,958 1,819
Non-interest income448 406 438
Net operating income before operating expenses and impairment charges2,415 2,364 2,257
Operating expenses(993)(930)(949)
Impairment (charges)/benefits10 (25)55
Profit before income tax1,432 1,409 1,363
Income tax expense(390)(393)(392)
Profit attributable to non-controlling interests– – –
Cash earnings for the year1,042 1,016 971
Net cash earnings adjustments(1)14 (15)
Net profit attributable to owners of Westpac Banking Corporation1,041 1,030 956
$bn $bn $bn
Deposits and other borrowings
1
64.5 61.9 58.4
Net loans84.2 80.4 77.3
Total assets97.1 90.0 88.3
Total funds11.5 10.7 10.1
Total operating expenses to net operating income ratio41.12%39.34%42.05%
2019 v 2018
Cash earnings increased 3% over 2018. The increase in cash earnings was supported by a NZ$40 million gain on the sale
of Paymark, and a NZ$10 million impairment benefit partly offset by higher risk management and regulatory costs.
Net interest income
up NZ$9 million,
Flat
• Loans increased 5%, or NZ$3.8 billion. Mortgages increased NZ$2.6 billion, with the majority
of mortgage growth in fixed rate products. Business growth (up NZ$1.3 billion) was
distributed across a range of sectors;
• Deposits increased 4% with a NZ$1.7 billion rise in non-interest bearing and at call accounts
and a NZ$0.9 billion rise in term deposits; and
• Net interest margin declined 8 basis points. Most of the decline (5 basis points) was due to
mix from the increase in lower spread products, particularly fixed rate mortgages. A fall in
deposit spreads from lower interest rates also contributed to the decline in margin.
Non-interest
income up NZ$42
million, 10%
• The gain on sale of Paymark contributed most (NZ$40 million) of the increase in non-interest
income;
• Higher investment income from a 7% increase in fund balances, higher business fees, and a
reduction in provisions for customer refunds and payments, also contributed to the increase;
and
• This was partly offset by lower fee income following the decision to simplify certain consumer
fees.
Operating
expenses up
NZ$63 million, 7%
• Most of the increase was driven by further investment in risk management and regulatory
programs.
• Provisions for estimated costs of NZ$16 million, to implement the division’s remediation
program also contributed to the increase; and
• Excluding investment and the above provisions, costs were broadly unchanged with increases
in salaries and other inflation linked costs offset by productivity savings from increased
digitisation of activities, with FTE down 1% and lower variable remuneration.
Impairment benefit
of NZ$10 million
(compared to an
impairment charge
of NZ$25 million in
FY18)
• Credit quality remains sound, with stressed exposures to TCE of 1.66%, 9 basis points higher
than September 2018 with most of the increase in stress in exposures that are well secured.
Other consumer 90+ day delinquencies increased 20 basis points to 82 basis points, with
much of the rise due to the decline in the portfolio; and
• Impairment benefit mostly from write-back of collectively assessed provision.
1002019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Divisional performance
AUD$m201920182017
Net interest income1,8601,7991,706
Non-interest income423373410
Net operating income before operating expenses and impairment charges2,2832,1722,116
Operating expenses(939)(855)(890)
Impairment (charges)/benefits10(22)51
Profit before income tax1,3541,2951,277
Income tax expense(369)(361)(360)
Profit attributable to non-controlling interests---
Cash earnings for the year985934917
Net cash earnings adjustments(1)13(14)
Net profit attributable to owners of Westpac Banking Corporation984947903
$bn$bn$bn
Deposits and other borrowings59.756.753.7
Net loans78.073.671.1
Total assets90.082.481.3
Total funds10.79.89.3
Total operating expenses to net operating income ratio
1
41.12%39.34%42.05%
1. Ratios calculated using NZ$.
1012019 Westpac Group Annual Report
1
2
3
4
Divisional performance
1
2
3
4
Group Businesses
This segment comprises:
• Treasury, which is responsible for the management of the Group’s balance sheet including wholesale funding,
capital and the management of liquidity. Treasury also manages the interest rate risk and foreign exchange risks
inherent in the balance sheet, including managing the mismatch between Group assets and liabilities. Treasury’s
earnings are primarily sourced from managing the Group’s balance sheet and interest rate risk, (excluding
Westpac New Zealand) within set risk limits;
• Group Technology
1
, which is responsible for technology strategy and architecture, infrastructure and operations,
applications development and business integration in Australia;
• Core Support
2
, which comprises functions performed centrally, including Australian banking operations,
property services, strategy, finance, risk, compliance, legal, human resources, and customer and corporate
relations; and
• Following the Group’s decision to restructure its wealth operations and exit its Advice business in March 2019,
the residual Advice operations (including associated remediation) and certain support functions of BTFG
Australia have been transferred to Group Businesses.
Group Technology costs are fully allocated to other divisions in the Group. Core Support costs are partially
allocated to other divisions, while Group Head Office costs are retained in Group Businesses.
Group Businesses also includes earnings on capital not allocated to divisions, certain intra-group transactions that
facilitate the presentation of the performance of the Group’s divisions, gains/losses from most asset sales, earnings
and costs associated with the Group’s Fintech investments, and certain other head office items such as centrally
raised provisions.
Financial performance
$m201920182017
Net interest income616 812 712
Non-interest income(618)89 181
Net operating income before operating expenses and impairment charges(2)901 893
Operating expenses(1,186)(969)(834)
Impairment benefits95 1 43
Profit before income tax(1,093)(67)102
Income tax (expense)/benefit225 (75)(126)
Profit attributable to non-controlling interests(1)1 –
Cash earnings for the year(869)(141)(24)
Net cash earnings adjustments(19)108 (92)
Net profit attributable to owners of Westpac Banking Corporation(888)(33)(116)
2019 v 2018
Provisions for estimated customer refunds, payments, associated costs, and litigation of $632 million and costs
associated with the Wealth Reset of $172 million incurred during the year was the key driver of the cash earnings
loss of $869 million in 2019. Excluding provisions for estimated customer refunds, payments, associated costs, and
litigation and costs associated with the Wealth Reset, Group Businesses cash earnings was $74 million lower as
the division recorded a loss of $65 million in 2019 compared to cash earnings of $9 million in 2018. The result was
driven by a lower contribution from Treasury partially offset by a higher impairment benefit.
Net operating
income down $903
million, large
• Net operating income was lower primarily from:
–an increased charge for estimated customer refunds and payments ($619 million) related
to Advice;
–a reduced contribution from Treasury related to interest rate risk management (down
$230 million) and lower Advice income; partly offset by
–a gain on asset sales and revaluation gains on a fintech investment ($24 million).
Operating
expenses up $217
million, large
• Estimated costs associated with implementing customer refunds and payments, the Wealth
Reset and litigation were $319 million higher; and
• Lower costs associated with the Royal Commission ($62 million) and lower variable reward.
Impairment
benefit $95 million,
a $94 million
increase
• An impairment benefit of $95 million reflect a reduction in centrally held overlays in 2019,
principally for the mining sector, partially offset by the introduction of an overlay for areas in
Australia impacted by persistent drought conditions, compared to a $1 million benefit in 2018.
1. Costs are fully allocated to other divisions in the Group.
2. Costs are partially allocated to other divisions in the Group, with costs attributed to enterprise activity retained in Group Businesses.
1022019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Risk and risk management
Risk factors
Our business is subject to risks that can adversely impact our financial performance, financial condition and future
performance. If any of the following risks occur, our business, prospects, reputation, financial performance or
financial condition could be materially adversely affected, with the result that the trading price of our securities
could decline and as a security holder you could lose all, or part, of your investment. You should carefully consider
the risks described and the other information in this Annual Report before investing in our securities. The risks and
uncertainties described below are not the only ones we face. Additional risks and uncertainties that we are unaware
of, or that we currently deem to be immaterial, may also become important factors that affect us.
Risks relating to our business
Our businesses are highly regulated and we have been and could be adversely affected by changes in laws,
regulations or regulatory policy
As a financial institution, we are subject to detailed laws and regulations in each of the jurisdictions in which we
operate or obtain funding, including Australia, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, the United States and various
jurisdictions in Asia and the Pacific. We are also supervised by a number of different regulatory and supervisory
authorities which have broad administrative powers over our businesses.
The Group’s business, prospects, reputation, financial performance and financial condition could all be affected by
changes to law and regulation, changes to policies and changes in the supervisory activities and expectations of
our regulators. The Group is currently operating in an environment where there is increased scrutiny of the financial
services sector and specifically, increased scrutiny of financial services providers by regulators. In this environment,
the Group faces increasing supervision and regulation in the jurisdictions in which we operate or obtain funding.
This environment has also served to increase the pace and scope of regulatory change.
Regulatory change could directly and adversely affect the Group’s financial condition and financial position. In
recent years, new laws have required Westpac to maintain increased levels of liquidity and hold higher levels of, and
better quality, capital and funding. Regulatory change may continue in this area. Regulation also affects the way
we operate our business. New regulation could require us to change our existing business models (including by
imposing restrictions on the types of businesses we can conduct) or amend our corporate structure.
Recently, policy makers and regulators have developed and implemented a range of regulations that affect how
we provide products and services to our customers. New laws have been introduced that further regulate our
ability to provide products and services to certain customers and that require us to alter our product and service
offerings. Our ability to set prices for certain products and services may also be impacted by future regulation. The
competitive landscape may also be altered by new laws affecting banks and financial services companies, or our
agents, authorised representatives and external service providers. The phasing in of Open Banking is one example
of new laws that are likely to affect competition amongst banks and other financial services providers in Australia.
Regulatory changes of this type could adversely affect one or more of our businesses, restrict our flexibility, require
us to incur substantial costs, impact the profitability of one or more of our business lines, result in the Group being
unable to increase or maintain market share and/or create pressure on our margins and fees, any of which could
adversely affect our business, prospects, financial performance or financial condition.
There are numerous sources of regulatory change that could affect our business. In some cases, changes to
regulation are driven by international bodies, such as the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS).
Regulatory change may also flow from reviews and inquiries commissioned by Governments or regulators. These
reviews and commissions of inquiry may lead to, and in some cases already have led to, substantial regulatory
change or investigations, which could have a material impact on our business, prospects, reputation, financial
performance or financial condition.
It is also possible that governments or regulators in jurisdictions in which we operate or obtain funding might
revise their application of existing regulatory policies that apply to, or impact, our business (including by instituting
macro-prudential limits on lending). Regulators or governments may take this action for a variety of reasons,
including for reasons relating to national interest and/or systemic stability.
Regulatory changes and the timing of their introduction continue to evolve and we manage our businesses in the
context of regulatory uncertainty and complexity. The nature and impact of future changes are not predictable
and are beyond our control. Regulatory compliance and the management of regulatory change are an important
part of our planning processes. We expect that we will continue to invest significantly in compliance and the
management and implementation of regulatory change and, at the same time, significant management attention
and resources will be required to update existing or implement new processes to comply with new regulations
(such as obligations to provide certain data and information to regulators) or new interpretations of existing laws
or regulations. The failure of the Group to appropriately manage and implement regulatory change, including
by failing to implement effective processes to comply with new regulations, has, in some instances, resulted in,
and could in the future result in, the Group failing to meet a compliance obligation. Further information about
the consequences of failing to meet a compliance obligation is set out in the section titled ‘Our businesses are
highly regulated and we have been or could be adversely affected by failing to comply with laws, regulations or
regulatory policy’ below.
Another consideration in managing regulatory change arises when regulation is introduced in one jurisdiction in
which we operate that conflicts with the way it is introduced in other jurisdictions in which we operate.
For further information about regulatory changes affecting the Group, refer to ‘Significant developments’ in
Section 1 and the sections ‘Critical accounting assumptions and estimates’ and ‘Future developments’ in Note 1 to
the financial statements.
Risk and risk management
1032019 Westpac Group Annual Report
1
2
3
4
Risk and risk management
1
2
3
4
Our businesses are highly regulated and we have been or could be adversely affected by failing to comply
with laws, regulations or regulatory policy
We are responsible for ensuring that we comply with all applicable legal and regulatory requirements and industry
codes of practice in the jurisdictions in which we operate or obtain funding, as well as meeting our ethical standards.
The Group is subject to compliance risk, which is the risk of legal or regulatory sanction or financial or reputational loss,
arising from our failure to abide by the compliance obligations required of us. This risk is exacerbated by the increasing
complexity and volume of regulation and can also arise where we interpret our obligations and rights differently to our
regulators or a Court. The potential for this to occur may be heightened in circumstances where regulation is untested
and/or not accompanied by extensive regulatory guidance.
The Group employs a compliance management system which is designed to identify, assess and manage
compliance risk. While this system is currently in place, it may not always have been or continue to be effective.
Breakdowns may occur in this system due, for example, to flaws in the design of controls or processes. This has
resulted in, and may in the future result in, potential breaches of our compliance obligations, as well as poor
customer outcomes.
The Group also depends on its employees, contractors, agents, authorised representatives and external service
providers to ‘do the right thing’ for it to meet its compliance obligations. Inappropriate conduct by these
individuals, such as neglecting to follow a policy or engaging in misconduct, could result in poor customer
outcomes and a failure by the Group to comply with compliance obligations.
The Group’s failure, or suspected failure, to comply with a compliance obligation could lead to a regulator
commencing surveillance or an investigation into the Group. This may, depending on the circumstances, result in
the regulator taking administrative or enforcement action against the Group and/or its representatives. Regulators
could seek to pursue civil or criminal proceedings, seeking substantial fines, civil penalties or other enforcement
outcomes. In addition, the failure or alleged failure of our competitors to comply with their obligations could lead
to increased regulatory scrutiny across the financial services sector.
In many cases, our regulators have broad powers. For example, under the Banking Act 1959 (Cth), APRA can, in
certain circumstances, issue a direction to us (such as a direction to comply with a prudential requirement, to
conduct an audit, to remove a Director, executive officer or employee, to take remedial action or not to undertake
transactions) or disqualify an ‘Accountable Person’ under the Banking and Executive Accountability Regime.
APRA also has the power to require us to hold additional capital, which they exercised earlier this year by applying
a $500 million overlay to our operational risk capital requirement following the completion of our self-assessment
into our frameworks and practices in relation to governance, culture and accountability. If the Group incurs
additional capital overlays in the future it may need to raise additional capital which could have an adverse impact
on our business, prospects, financial performance and financial condition.
The current political and regulatory environment that the Group is operating in has also seen (and may in the future
see) our regulators receive new powers. Recently, legislation was passed by the Australian Parliament that provided
ASIC with a product intervention power which enables ASIC to make orders that prevent issuers of financial
products from engaging in certain conduct.
In addition, legislation has been passed that materially increases the penalties that can be imposed for corporate
and financial sector misconduct. In particular, ASIC can commence civil penalty proceedings and seek significant
civil penalties against an Australian Financial Services licensee (such as Westpac) for failing to do all things
necessary to ensure that financial services provided under the licence are provided efficiently, honestly and fairly.
The Group may also face significant penalties for failing to comply with other obligations, such as those provided
for under the recently legislated Consumer Data Right. This trend towards increasingly severe penalties for failing
to meet compliance obligations could continue in the future and be expanded into other areas of regulation that
the Group is subject to.
Changes may also occur in the oversight approach of regulators, which could result in a regulator preferring its
enforcement powers over a more consultative approach. In recent years, there have been significant increases in
the nature and scale of regulatory investigations, enforcement actions and the quantum of fines issued by global
regulators.
This dynamic is apparent, with ASIC committing to conducting more enforcement actions against large financial
institutions and adopting a ‘why not litigate?’ enforcement stance. ASIC has also continued to implement its ‘Close
and Continuous Monitoring’ program, which has seen ASIC staff embedded within the institutions they supervise,
including Westpac.
APRA has publicly committed to a revised approach to enforcement as well. APRA has indicated that it will use
enforcement where appropriate to prevent and address serious prudential risks and hold entities and individuals to
account.
The current environment may see a shift in the nature of enforcement proceedings commenced by regulators. As
well as conducting more civil penalty proceedings, our regulators may be more likely to bring criminal proceedings
against institutions and/or their representatives in the future. Alternatively, regulators may elect to make criminal
referrals to the Commonwealth Department of Public Prosecutions or other prosecutorial bodies.
The provision of new powers to regulators, coupled with the increasingly active supervisory and enforcement
approaches adopted by them, increases the prospect of adverse regulatory action being brought against the
Group. Further, the severity and consequences of that action are now greater, given the expansion of penalties for
corporate and financial sector misconduct.
1042019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Risk and risk management
Regulatory action brought against the Group may expose the Group to an increased risk of litigation brought by
third parties (including through class action proceedings), which may require the Group to pay compensation to
third parties and/or undertake further remediation activities.
Regulatory investigations, inquiries, litigation, fines, penalties, infringement notices, revocation, suspension or
variation of conditions of relevant regulatory licences or other enforcement or administrative action or agreements
(such as enforceable undertakings) could, either individually or in aggregate with other regulatory action, adversely
affect our business, prospects, reputation, financial performance or financial condition. For further details about
regulatory matters that may affect the Group, refer to ‘Significant Developments’ in Section 1.
The failure to comply with financial crime obligations could have an adverse effect on our business and
reputation
The Group is subject to anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing (AML/CTF) laws, anti-bribery
and corruption laws, economic and trade sanctions laws and tax transparency laws in the jurisdictions in which
it operates. These laws can be complex and, in some circumstances, impose a diverse range of obligations. For
example, AML/CTF laws require Westpac and other regulated institutions to (amongst other things) undertake
customer identification and verification, conduct ongoing due diligence on customers, maintain and comply with
an AML/CTF program and undertake ongoing risk assessments. AML/CTF laws also require Westpac to report
certain matters and transactions to regulators (including in relation to International Funds Transfer Instructions,
Threshold Transaction Reports and Suspicious Matter Reports) and ensure that certain information is not disclosed
to third parties in a way that would contravene the ‘tipping off’ provisions in AML/CTF legislation.
In recent years there has been increased focus on compliance with financial crime obligations, with regulators
around the globe commencing large-scale investigations and taking enforcement action where they have identified
non-compliance (often seeking significant monetary penalties). Further, due to the large volume of transactions
that the Group processes, the undetected failure or the ineffective implementation, monitoring or remediation of a
system, policy, process or control (including in relation to a regulatory reporting obligation) has in some instances,
and could in the future result in, a significant number of breaches of AML/CTF obligations. This in turn could lead
to significant monetary penalties.
While the Group has systems, policies, processes and controls in place that are designed to manage its financial
crime obligations (including its reporting obligations), these have not always been, and may not in the future
always be effective. The Group is currently undertaking a multi-year program designed to address areas of control
weaknesses in its financial crime management framework and improve the management of this risk class.
If we fail, or where we have failed, to comply with these obligations, we could face regulatory enforcement action
such as litigation, significant fines, penalties and the revocation, suspension or variation of licence conditions.
As reported in the Group’s 2018 Annual Report, the Group self-reported to AUSTRAC a failure to report a large
number of ITFIs (as required under Australia’s AML/CTF Act). AUSTRAC has issued a number of detailed statutory
notices over the last year requiring information relating to the Group’s processes, procedures and oversight. These
notices relate to a range of matters including these IFTI reporting failures and associated potential failings related
to record keeping and obligations to obtain and pass on certain data in funds transfer instructions, as well as
correspondent banking due diligence, risk assessments and transaction monitoring. Further information is set out
in ‘Significant Developments’ in section 1 and in Note 27 to the financial statements.
Non-compliance with financial crime obligations could also lead to litigation commenced by third parties (including
class action proceedings) and cause reputational damage. These actions could, either individually or in aggregate,
adversely affect our business, prospects, reputation, financial performance or financial condition.
Reputational damage could harm our business and prospects
Our ability to attract and retain customers and our prospects could be adversely affected if our reputation is
damaged.
Reputation risk is the risk of loss of reputation, stakeholder confidence or public trust and standing. It arises where
there are differences between stakeholders’ current and emerging perceptions, beliefs and expectations and our
past, current and planned activities, processes, performance and behaviours.
There are various potential sources of reputational damage. Westpac’s reputation may be damaged where any of
its policies, processes, practices or behaviours result in a negative outcome for a customer or a class of customers.
Other potential sources of reputational damage include the failure to effectively manage risks in accordance with
our risk management frameworks , failure to comply with legal and regulatory requirements, adverse findings from
regulatory reviews (including Westpac-specific and industry-wide reviews), environmental, social and ethical issues,
failure of information security systems, technology failures, security breaches and inadequate record keeping which
may prevent Westpac from demonstrating that a past decision was appropriate at the time it was made.
Westpac may suffer reputational damage where its conduct, practices, behaviours or business activities do not
align with the evolving standards and expectations of the community, our regulators and other stakeholders.
As these expectations may exceed the standard required in order to comply with the law, Westpac may incur
reputational damage even where it has met its legal obligations. Our reputation could also be adversely affected by
the actions of the financial services industry in general or from the actions of our competitors, customers, suppliers,
joint-venture partners, strategic partners and other counterparties.
Furthermore, the risk of reputational damage may be heightened by factors such as the increasing use of social
media or the increasing prevalence of groups which seek to publicly challenge the Group’s strategy or approach to
aspects of its business.
1052019 Westpac Group Annual Report
1
2
3
4
Risk and risk management
1
2
3
4
Failure, or perceived failure, to appropriately address issues that could or do give rise to reputational risk could
also impact the regulatory change agenda, give rise to additional legal risk, subject us to regulatory investigations,
regulatory enforcement actions, fines and penalties or litigation brought by third parties (including class actions),
require us to remediate and compensate customers and incur remediation costs or harm our reputation among
customers, investors and the marketplace. This could lead to loss of business which could adversely affect our
business, prospects, financial performance or financial condition.
The Royal Commission has led to, and may continue to lead to, regulatory enforcement activity, litigation
and changes in laws, regulations or regulatory policy, and has resulted in, and may continue to result in,
ongoing reputational damage to the Group, all of which has and may continue to have an adverse effect
on our business and prospects
The Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry investigated
(amongst other things) whether any conduct, practices, behaviours or business activities engaged in by financial
services entities amounted to potential misconduct, or fell below community standards and expectations.
These investigations (including the public hearings, submissions, evidence and findings of the Royal Commission)
had, and may continue to have, an adverse impact on the Group’s reputation and potentially the financial
performance of the Group’s businesses. In addition, the Royal Commission’s findings have led to, and may
continue to lead in the future to, regulators commencing investigations and/or enforcement action against
financial institutions (including the Group). This environment has also resulted in an increase in class actions or
other litigation being commenced by the Group’s customers, including in relation to matters raised at the Royal
Commission. For further information about this risk, refer to the section titled ‘We have and could suffer losses due
to litigation (including class action proceedings)’ below.
In addition, the recommendations made in the Final Report of the Commission (which was publicly released on 4
February 2019) have resulted and will, depending on how its recommendations are implemented, result in further
changes to legislation, and further influence the policies and practices of our regulators. In some instances, this
has already had, and may continue to have in the future, an adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial
performance or financial condition.
The Royal Commission has also led to increased political or regulatory scrutiny of the financial industry in New
Zealand, and may continue to do so.
We have and could suffer losses due to litigation (including class action proceedings)
The Group (and individual entities within the Group) may, from time to time, be involved in legal proceedings,
regulatory actions or arbitration arising from the conduct of their business and the performance of their legal and
regulatory obligations. Proceedings could be commenced against the Group by a range of potential plaintiffs,
such as our customers, shareholders, suppliers and counterparties. These plaintiffs may commence proceedings
individually or they may commence class action proceedings.
In recent years, there has been an increase in the number of class action proceedings brought against financial
services companies (and other organisations more broadly), many of which have resulted in significant monetary
settlements. The risk of class action proceedings being commenced is heightened by findings from regulatory
investigations or inquiries (such as the Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Financial Services Industry),
adverse media, an adverse judgment or the settlement of proceedings brought by a regulator. Furthermore,
there is a risk that class action proceedings commenced against a competitor could lead to similar class action
proceedings being commenced against the Group.
The growth in third party litigation funding in Australia has also contributed to a recent increase in the number
of class actions being commenced in Australia. This trend may continue in light of recent court judgments which
have clarified the courts’ approach to liability and loss on certain types of class action claims. This clarification may
encourage plaintiffs, law firms and funders to bring and maintain class action proceedings, as well as potentially
improve the ability of plaintiffs to establish certain types of class action claims.
From time to time, class action proceedings are commenced against the Group. For further information about class
action proceedings that the Group is currently involved in, refer to Note 27 in the financial statements.
Litigation (including class action proceedings) may, either individually or in aggregate, adversely affect the Group’s
business, operations, prospects, reputation or financial condition. This risk is heightened by the recent increases
in the severity of penalties for certain breaches of the law. Such matters are subject to many uncertainties (for
example, the outcome may not be able to be predicted accurately). Furthermore, the Group’s ability to respond to
and defend litigation may be adversely affected by inadequate record keeping.
Depending on the outcome of any litigation, the Group may be required to comply with broad court orders,
including compliance orders, enforcement orders or otherwise pay money such as damages, fines, penalties or
legal costs.
The Group’s material contingent liabilities are described in Note 27 to the financial statements. There is a risk that these
contingent liabilities may be larger than anticipated or that additional litigation or other contingent liabilities may arise,
which could adversely affect our business, prospects, reputation, financial performance or financial condition.
We have suffered and could in the future suffer information security risks, including cyberattacks
The proliferation of new technologies, the increasing use of the internet and telecommunications to conduct
financial transactions and the growing sophistication and activities of attackers (including organised crime and
state-sponsored actors) have resulted in increased information security risks for major financial institutions such as
Westpac and our external service providers.
1062019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Risk and risk management
While Westpac has systems in place to protect against, detect and respond to cyberattacks, these systems have
not always been, and may not in the future always be effective. There can be no assurance that we will not suffer
losses from cyberattacks or other information security breaches. The Group may not be able to anticipate and
prevent a cyberattack, or it may not be able to implement effective measures to respond to a cyberattack in
progress. Further, there is a risk that the Group will not be able to rectify or minimise the damage resulting from a
cyberattack.
If the Group incurs a successful cyberattack, technology systems might fail to operate properly or become disabled
and it could result in the unauthorised release, gathering, monitoring, misuse, loss or destruction of confidential,
proprietary and other information of the Group, its employees, customers or third parties or otherwise adversely
impact network access, business operations or availability of services.
In addition, as cyber threats continue to evolve, we may be required to expend significant additional resources to
modify or enhance our systems or to investigate and remediate any vulnerabilities or incidents.
Our operations rely on the secure processing, storage and transmission of information on our computer systems
and networks, and the systems and networks of external suppliers. Although we implement measures to protect
the security, integrity and confidentiality of our information, there is a risk that the computer systems, software and
networks on which we rely may be subject to security breaches, unauthorised access, malicious software, external
attacks or internal breaches that could have an adverse impact on our confidential information or that of our
customers and counterparties.
Major banks in other jurisdictions have suffered security breaches from sophisticated cyberattacks. Our external
service providers, other parties that facilitate our business activities and financial platforms and infrastructure
(such as clearing houses, payment systems and exchanges) are also subject to the risk of cyberattacks. Any such
security breach could result in the loss of customers and business opportunities, significant disruption to Westpac’s
operations, misappropriation of Westpac’s confidential information and/or that of our customers and damage
to Westpac’s computers or systems and/or those of our customers. Such a security breach could also result in
reputational damage, claims for compensation and regulatory investigations and penalties, which could adversely
affect our business, prospects, financial performance or financial condition.
Our risk and exposure to such threats remains heightened because of the evolving nature of technology, Westpac’s
prominence within the financial services industry, the prominence of our customers (including those in the
government, mining and health sectors), increasing obligations to make data and information available to external
third parties and our plans to continue to improve and expand our internet and mobile banking infrastructure.
We could suffer losses due to technology failures or our inability to appropriately manage and upgrade
our technology
The reliability, integrity and security of our information and technology is crucial in supporting our customers’
banking requirements and meeting our compliance obligations and our regulators’ expectations.
While the Group has a number of processes in place to provide for and monitor the availability and recovery of
our systems, there is a risk that our information and technology systems might fail to operate properly or become
disabled, including as a result of events that are wholly or partially beyond our control.
If we incur a technology failure we may fail to meet a compliance obligation (such as the obligation to retain
records and data for requisite periods of time), or our customers may be adversely affected. This could potentially
result in reputational damage, remediation costs and a regulator commencing an investigation and/or taking
administrative or enforcement action against us. The overuse or overreliance on legacy or outdated systems may
heighten the risk of a technology failure occurring.
Further, in order to continue to deliver new products and services to customers, comply with our regulatory
obligations (such as obligations to report certain data and information to regulators) and meet the ongoing
expectations of our regulators and our customers, we need to regularly renew and enhance our technology. We
are constantly managing technology projects including projects to consolidate technology platforms, simplify
and enhance our technology and operations environment, assist us to comply with legal obligations, improve
productivity and provide for a better customer experience. Failure to implement these projects or manage
associated change effectively could result in cost overruns, unrealised productivity, operational instability, failure to
meet compliance obligations, reputational damage and/or result in the loss of market share to competitors. In turn,
this could place us at a competitive disadvantage and adversely affect our financial performance.
Adverse credit and capital market conditions or depositor preferences may significantly affect our ability
to meet funding and liquidity needs and may increase our cost of funding
We rely on deposits, and credit and capital markets, to fund our business and as a source of liquidity. Our liquidity
and costs of obtaining funding are related to credit and capital market conditions.
Global credit and capital markets can experience periods of extreme volatility, disruption and decreased liquidity
as was demonstrated during the Global Financial Crisis. While there have now been extended periods of stability in
these markets, the environment remains unpredictable. The main risks we face are damage to market confidence,
changes to the access and cost of funding and a slowing in global activity or other impacts on entities with whom
we do business.
As of 30 September 2019, approximately 30% of our total funding originated from domestic and international
wholesale markets. Of this, around 65% was sourced outside Australia and New Zealand. Customer deposits
provide around 63% of total funding. Customer deposits held by Westpac are comprised of both term deposits
which can be withdrawn after a certain period of time and at call deposits which can be withdrawn at any time.
1072019 Westpac Group Annual Report
1
2
3
4
Risk and risk management
1
2
3
4
A shift in investment preferences could result in deposit withdrawals by customers which could increase our need
for funding from other, potentially less stable, or more expensive, forms of funding.
If market conditions deteriorate due to economic, financial, political or other reasons, there may also be a loss of
confidence in bank deposits and we could experience unexpected deposit withdrawals. In this situation our funding
costs may be adversely affected and our liquidity and our funding and lending activities may be constrained.
If our current sources of funding prove to be insufficient, we may be forced to seek alternative financing. The
availability of such alternative financing, and the terms on which it may be available, will depend on a variety
of factors, including prevailing market conditions, the availability of credit, our credit ratings and credit market
capacity. Even if available, these alternatives may be more expensive or on unfavourable terms, which could
adversely affect our financial performance, liquidity, capital resources or financial condition. There is no assurance
that we will be able to obtain adequate funding, do so at acceptable prices, or that we will be able to recover any
additional costs.
If Westpac is unable to source appropriate funding, we may also be forced to reduce our lending or begin selling
liquid securities. Such actions may adversely impact our business, prospects, liquidity, capital resources, financial
performance or financial condition. If Westpac is unable to source appropriate funding for an extended period, or
if it can no longer sell liquid securities, there is a risk that Westpac will be unable to pay its debts as and when they
become due and payable.
Westpac enters into collateralised derivative obligations, which may require Westpac to post additional collateral
based on movements in market rates, which has the potential to adversely affect Westpac’s liquidity or ability to
use derivative obligations to hedge its interest rate, currency and other financial instrument risks.
For a more detailed description of liquidity risk, refer to ‘Funding and liquidity risk’ in Note 21 to the financial
statements.
Sovereign risk may destabilise financial markets adversely
Sovereign risk is the risk that governments will default on their debt obligations, will be unable to refinance their
debts as they fall due or will nationalise parts of their economy including assets of financial institutions such as
Westpac. Sovereign defaults could negatively impact the value of our holdings of high quality liquid assets. There
may also be a cascading effect to other markets and countries, the consequences of which, while difficult to
predict, may be similar to or worse than those experienced during the Global Financial Crisis. Such an event could
destabilise global financial markets, adversely affecting our liquidity, financial performance or financial condition.
Failure to maintain credit ratings could adversely affect our cost of funds, liquidity, competitive position
and access to capital markets
Credit ratings are independent opinions on our creditworthiness. Our credit ratings can affect the cost and
availability of our funding from capital markets and other funding sources and they may be important to customers
or counterparties when evaluating our products and services. Therefore, maintaining high credit ratings is
important.
The credit ratings assigned to us by rating agencies are based on an evaluation of a number of factors, including
our financial strength, the quality of our governance, structural considerations regarding the Australian financial
system and the credit rating of the Australian Government. A credit rating downgrade could be driven by a
downgrade of the Australian Government, the occurrence of one or more of the other risks identified in this section
or by other events including changes to the methodologies used by the rating agencies to determine ratings.
A downgrade or series of downgrades to our credit ratings could have an adverse effect on our cost of funds
and related margins, collateral requirements, liquidity, competitive position and our access to capital markets. The
extent and nature of these impacts would depend on various factors, including the extent of any ratings change,
whether our ratings differ among agencies (split ratings) and whether any ratings changes also impact our
competitors or the sector.
A systemic shock in relation to the Australian, New Zealand or other financial systems could have adverse
consequences for Westpac or its customers or counterparties that would be difficult to predict and
respond to
There is a risk that a major systemic shock could occur that causes an adverse impact on the Australian,
New Zealand or other financial systems.
As outlined above, during the past decade the financial services industry and capital markets have been, and may
continue to be, adversely affected by market volatility, global economic conditions, geopolitical instability (such
as threats of or actual conflict occurring around the world) and political developments. In particular, there are
significant and ongoing global political developments that have the potential to impact major global economies,
including Brexit and the introduction of tariffs and other protectionist measures by various countries, such as
the US and China. A shock to one of the major global economies could again result in currency and interest rate
fluctuations and operational disruptions that negatively impact the Group.
Any such market and economic disruptions could adversely affect financial institutions such as Westpac because
consumer and business spending may decrease, unemployment may rise and demand for the products and
services we provide may decline, thereby reducing our earnings. These conditions may also affect the ability of
our borrowers to repay their loans or our counterparties to meet their obligations, causing us to incur higher credit
losses and affect investors’ willingness to invest in the Group. These events could also result in the undermining of
confidence in the financial system, reducing liquidity, impairing our access to funding and impairing our customers
and counterparties and their businesses. If this were to occur, our business, prospects, financial performance or
financial condition could be adversely affected.
1082019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Risk and risk management
The nature and consequences of any such event are difficult to predict and there can be no certainty that we could
respond effectively to any such event.
Declines in asset markets could adversely affect our operations or profitability
Declines in Australian, New Zealand or other asset markets, including equity, residential and commercial property
and other asset markets, could adversely affect our operations and profitability.
Declining asset prices also impact our wealth management business. Earnings in our wealth management business
are, in part, dependent on asset values because we typically receive fees based on the value of securities and/or
assets held or managed. A decline in asset prices could negatively impact the earnings of this business.
Declining asset prices could also impact customers and counterparties and the value of security (including
residential and commercial property) we hold against loans and derivatives. This may impact our ability to recover
amounts owing to us if customers or counterparties were to default. It may also affect our level of provisioning
which in turn impacts our profitability and financial condition.
Our business is substantially dependent on the Australian and New Zealand economies
Our revenues and earnings are dependent on economic activity and the level of financial services our customers
require. In particular, lending is dependent on various factors including economic growth, business investment,
business and consumer sentiment, levels of employment, interest rates, asset prices and trade flows in the
countries in which we operate.
We conduct the majority of our business in Australia and New Zealand and, consequently, our performance
is influenced by the level and cyclical nature of lending in these countries. These factors are in turn impacted
by both domestic and international economic conditions, natural disasters and political events. A significant
decrease in Australian and New Zealand housing valuations could adversely impact our home lending activities
because borrowers with loans in excess of their property value show a higher propensity to default. In the event
of defaults our security may be eroded, causing us to incur higher credit losses. The demand for our home lending
products may also decline due to adverse changes in tax legislation (such as changes to tax rates, concessions or
deductions), regulatory requirements or other buyer concerns about decreases in values.
Adverse changes to economic and business conditions in Australia and New Zealand and other countries such as
China, India, Japan and the US could also adversely affect the Australian economy and our customers. In particular,
due to the current economic relationship between Australia and China, particularly in the mining and resources
sectors, a slowdown in China’s economic growth, including as the result of the implementation of tariffs or other
protectionist trade measures, could negatively impact the Australian economy. Changes in commodity prices,
Chinese government policies and broader economic conditions could, in turn, result in reduced demand for our
products and services and affect the ability of our borrowers to repay their loans. If this were to occur, it could
negatively impact our business, prospects, financial performance or financial condition.
Monetary policy can also significantly affect the Group. Interest rate settings (including low or negative rates),
as well as other actions taken by central banks (such as quantitative easing), may adversely affect our cost of
funds, the value of our lending and investments and our margins. Monetary policies also impact the broader
economic conditions of the various jurisdictions that the Group operates or obtains funding in. These policies
could affect demand for our products and services and/or have a negative impact on the Group’s customers and
counterparties, potentially increasing the risk that they will default on their obligations to the Group. All of these
factors could adversely affect our business, prospects, financial performance or financial condition.
An increase in defaults in credit exposures could adversely affect our liquidity, capital resources, financial
performance or financial condition
Credit risk is the risk of financial loss where a customer or counterparty fails to meet their financial obligations to
Westpac. It is a significant risk and arises primarily from our lending activities.
We establish provisions for credit impairment based on current information and our expectations. If economic
conditions deteriorate outside of our expectations, some customers and/or counterparties could experience higher
levels of financial stress and we may experience a significant increase in defaults and write-offs, and be required
to increase our provisioning. Such events would diminish available capital and could adversely affect our liquidity,
capital resources, financial performance or financial condition.
Credit risk also arises from certain derivative, clearing and settlement contracts we enter into, and from our
dealings with, and holdings of, debt securities issued by other banks, financial institutions, companies, clearing
houses, governments and government bodies, the financial conditions of which may be affected to varying degrees
by economic conditions in global financial markets.
For a discussion of our risk management procedures, including the management of credit risk, refer to the ‘Risk
management’ section and Note 21 in the financial statements.
We face intense competition in all aspects of our business
The financial services industry is highly competitive. We compete, both domestically and internationally, with a
range of firms, including retail and commercial banks, asset managers, investment banking firms, brokerage firms,
other financial service firms and businesses in other industries with emerging financial services aspirations. This
includes specialist competitors that may not be subject to the same capital and regulatory requirements and
therefore may be able to operate more efficiently. Digital technologies are changing consumer behaviour and the
competitive environment. The use of digital channels by customers to conduct their banking continues to rise and
emerging competitors are increasingly utilising new technologies and seeking to disrupt existing business models,
1092019 Westpac Group Annual Report
1
2
3
4
Risk and risk management
1
2
3
4
including in relation to digital payment services. The Group faces competition from established providers of
financial services as well as from banking businesses developed by non-financial services companies.
The competitive environment may also change as a result of legislative reforms.
If we are unable to compete effectively in the increasingly competitive environment in which our various businesses
operate, our market share may decline. This may adversely affect us by diverting business to our competitors or
creating pressure to lower margins and fees.
Increased competition for deposits could also increase our cost of funding and lead us to seek access to other
types of funding or reduce lending. We rely on bank deposits to fund a significant portion of our balance sheet and
deposits have been a relatively stable source of funding. We compete with banks and other financial services firms
for such deposits. To the extent that we are not able to successfully compete for deposits, we would be forced to
rely more heavily on other, potentially less stable or more expensive forms of funding, or reduce lending.
We are also dependent on our ability to offer products and services that match evolving customer preferences.
If we are not successful in developing or introducing new products and services or responding or adapting to
changes in customer preferences and habits, we may lose customers to our competitors. This could adversely
affect our business, prospects, financial performance or financial condition.
For more detail on how we address competitive pressures refer to the section titled Competition in the Directors’
Report in Section 1.
We could suffer losses due to market volatility
We are exposed to market risk as a consequence of our trading activities in financial markets, our defined benefit
plan and through the asset and liability management of our financial position. This is the risk of an adverse impact
on earnings resulting from changes in market factors, such as foreign exchange rates, commodity prices, equity
prices, and interest rates including the potential for low or negative interest rates. This includes interest rate risk in
the banking book, such as the risk to interest income from a mismatch between the duration of assets and liabilities
that arises in the normal course of business activities.
Changes in market factors could be driven by a number of developments. As an example, in July 2017, the FCA
which regulates the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”), announced that it would not require panel banks to
continue to submit rates for the calculation of the LIBOR benchmark after 2021. Accordingly, the continuation of
LIBOR in its current form will not be guaranteed after 2021, and it appears likely that LIBOR will be discontinued
or modified by 2021. Any such developments or future changes in the administration of LIBOR or any other
benchmarks could result in adverse consequences to the return on, value of and market for securities and other
instruments whose returns are linked to any such benchmark, including those securities or other instruments issued
by the Group.
If we were to suffer substantial losses due to any market volatility (including changes in the return on, value of
or market for, securities or other instruments) it may adversely affect our business, prospects, liquidity, capital
resources, financial performance or financial condition. For a discussion of our risk management procedures,
including the management of market risk, refer to the ‘Risk management’ section.
We have and could suffer losses due to operational risks
Operational risk is the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, people and systems
or from external events. It also includes, among other things, reputational risk, technology risk, model risk and
outsourcing risk, as well as the risk of business disruption due to external events such as natural disasters,
environmental hazard, damage to critical utilities, and targeted activism and protest activity. While we have policies,
processes and controls in place to manage these risks, these may not always have been, or continue to be effective.
Ineffective processes and controls have resulted in, and could in the future result in an adverse outcome for
Westpac’s customers. For example, a process breakdown could result in a customer not receiving a product on
the terms and conditions, or at the pricing, they agreed to. In addition, inadequate record keeping may prevent
Westpac from demonstrating that a past decision was appropriate at the time it was made or that a particular
action or activity was undertaken. If this was to occur, Westpac may incur significant costs in paying refunds and
compensation to customers, as well as remediating any underlying process breakdown. Failed processes could
also result in Westpac incurring losses because it is not able to enforce its contractual rights. This could arise
in circumstances where Westpac did not correctly document its rights or failed to perfect a security interest.
These types of operational failures, may also result in increased regulatory scrutiny and depending on the nature
of the failure and its impact, result in a regulator potentially commencing an investigation and/or taking other
enforcement, administrative or supervisory action.
We could incur losses from fraudulent applications for loans or from incorrect or fraudulent payments and
settlements, particularly real-time payments. Fraudulent conduct can also emerge from external parties seeking to
access the bank’s systems and customers’ accounts. If systems, procedures and protocols for managing fraud fail,
or are ineffective, they could lead to losses which could adversely affect our customers, as well as our business,
prospects, reputation, financial performance or financial condition.
Accurate and complete data is critical to ensure that Westpac’s systems (both customer facing and back-office)
and financial reporting processes operate effectively. In some areas of its business and operations, Westpac is
1102019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Risk and risk management
affected by poor data quality. This has arisen and could in the future arise in a number of ways, including through
inadequacies in systems, processes and policies. This could lead to deficiencies or failings in customer service,
risk management, financial reporting (including in the calculation of risk weighted assets), credit systems and
processes, compliance with legal obligations (including obligations to provide data to regulators) and also result
in poor decision making, including in relation to the provision of credit and the terms on which it is provided. Poor
data quality could affect the ability of Westpac to improve systems and processes. Westpac is also exposed to
model risk, being the risk of loss arising from errors or inadequacies in data or a model, or in the control and use of
a model.
Westpac is required to retain and access data and documentation for specific retention periods in order to satisfy
its compliance obligations. In some cases, Westpac also retains data to enable it to demonstrate that a past
decision was appropriate at the time it was made. Failings in systems, processes and policies could all adversely
affect Westpac’s ability to retain and access data.
In recent times, financial services entities have been increasingly sharing data with third parties, such as suppliers
and regulators (both domestic and offshore), in order to conduct their business activities and meet regulatory
obligations. A breakdown in a process or control related to the transfer, storage or protection of data transferred
to a third party, or the failure of a third party to use and handle this data correctly, could result in the Group failing
to meet a compliance obligation (including any relevant privacy obligations) and/or have an adverse impact on our
customers and the Group.
Westpac also relies on a number of suppliers, both in Australia and overseas, to provide services to it and its
customers. Failure by these suppliers to deliver services as required could disrupt services and adversely impact
Westpac’s operations, profitability or reputation. The Group could also be adversely affected by events that cause
disruption within the banking and financial services industry. For example, there is a risk that if central banks adopt
negative interest rates in the future, the technology systems used by the Group, its counterparties and/or financial
infrastructure providers may fail to operate correctly and this may cause loss or damage to the Group and/or its
counterparties.
Operational risks can impact our reputation and result in financial losses (including through decreased demand for
our products and services) which would adversely affect our financial performance or financial condition.
For a discussion of our risk management procedures, including the management of operational risk, refer to the
‘Risk management’ section.
Operational risk, technology risk, conduct risk or compliance risk events have required, and could in the
future require, Westpac to undertake customer remediation activity
Westpac relies on a large number of policies, processes, procedures, systems and people to conduct its business.
Breakdowns or deficiencies in one of these areas (arising from one or more operational risk, technology risk,
conduct risk or compliance risk events) have resulted, and could in the future result in, adverse outcomes for
customers which Westpac is required to remediate.
These events could require the Group to incur significant remediation costs (which may include compensation
payments to customers and costs associated with correcting the underlying issue) and result in reputational
damage.
There are significant challenges and risks involved in customer remediation activities. Westpac’s ability to
investigate an adverse customer outcome that may require remediation could be impeded if the issue is a legacy
matter spanning beyond our record retention period, or if our record keeping is otherwise inadequate. Depending
on the nature of the issue, it may be difficult to quantify and scope the remediation activity.
Determining how to properly and fairly compensate customers can also be a complicated exercise involving
numerous stakeholders, such as the affected customers, regulators and industry bodies. The Group’s proposed
approach to a remediation may be affected by a number of events, such as a group of affected customers
commencing class action proceedings on behalf of the broader population of affected customers, or a regulator
exercising their powers to require that a particular approach to remediation be taken. These factors could impact
the timeframe for completing the remediation activity, potentially resulting in Westpac failing to execute the
remediation in a timely manner. A failure of this type could lead to a regulator commencing enforcement action
against the Group. The ineffective or slow completion of a remediation also exposes the Group to reputational
damage, with the Group potentially being criticised by regulators, affected customers, the media and other
stakeholders, resulting in reputational damage.
The significant challenges and risks involved in scoping and executing remediations in a timely way also create the
potential for remediation costs actually incurred to be higher than those initially estimated by the Group.
If the Group cannot effectively scope, quantify or implement a remediation activity in a timely way, there could be
a negative impact on our business, prospects, reputation, financial performance or financial condition.
We have and could suffer losses due to conduct risk
Conduct risk is the risk that our provision of services and products results in unsuitable or unfair outcomes for
our stakeholders or undermines market integrity. Conduct risk could occur through the provision of products and
services to our customers that do not meet their needs or do not support market integrity, as well as the poor
conduct of our employees, contractors, agents, authorised representatives and external service providers, which
could include deliberate attempts by such individuals to circumvent Westpac’s controls, processes and procedures.
This could occur through a failure to meet professional obligations to specific clients (including fiduciary and
suitability requirements), poor product design and implementation, failure to adequately consider customer needs
1112019 Westpac Group Annual Report
1
2
3
4
Risk and risk management
1
2
3
4
or selling products and services outside of customer target markets. Conduct risk may also arise where there has
been a failure to adequately provide a product or services that we had agreed to provide a customer.
While we have frameworks, policies, processes and controls that are designed to manage poor conduct outcomes,
these policies and processes may not always have been or continue to be effective. The failure of these policies
and processes could result in financial losses and reputational damage and this could adversely affect our business,
prospects, financial performance or financial condition.
We could suffer losses and our business has been and could be adversely affected by the failure to adopt
and implement effective risk management
We have implemented risk management strategies, policies and internal controls involving processes and
procedures intended to identify, monitor and manage risks facing the Group. However, our risk management
framework has not always been, or may not in the future prove to be, effective.
This could be because the design of the framework may be inadequate, which could result in key information
not being provided to decision-makers in the right form and in a timely manner, or because of weaknesses in
underlying data. There is also the possibility that key risk management policies, controls and processes may be
ineffective, either due to inadequacies in their design, or because of the poor implementation of these policies,
controls and processes.
There are also inherent limitations with any risk management framework as there may exist, or emerge in the
future, risks that we have not anticipated or identified and our controls may not be effective.
Risk management frameworks may also prove ineffective because of weaknesses in risk culture, which may result
in risks and control weaknesses not being identified, escalated and acted upon. Further, while the development of
appropriate remuneration structures can play an important role in supporting a sound risk culture, a deficiency in
the design or operation of our remuneration structures could have a negative effect, potentially resulting in staff
engaging in excessive risk taking behaviours.
Risk management failings of the type outlined above could adversely the Group in numerous ways, with the
Group potentially being exposed to higher levels of risk than expected, which may result in the Group incurring
unexpected losses, breaches of compliance obligations and reputational damage.
As part of the Group’s risk management framework, the Group measures and monitors risks against its risk
appetite. Where the Group identifies a risk as being out-of-appetite, the Group needs to take steps to bring this
risk back into appetite in a timely way. However, the Group may not always be able to achieve this within proposed
timeframes. This may occur because, for example, the Group experiences delays in enhancing its information
technology systems to better manage the out-of-appetite risk, or in recruiting sufficient numbers of appropriately
trained staff to undertake required activities. It is also possible that, because of external factors beyond the Group’s
control, certain risks may be inherently outside of appetite for periods of time. In addition, the Group is required to
periodically review its risk management framework to determine whether it remains appropriate.
If the Group is unable to bring risks back into appetite, or if it is determined that the Group’s risk management
framework is no longer appropriate, the Group may incur unexpected losses and be required to undertake
considerable remedial work. The failure to remedy this situation could result in increased scrutiny from regulators,
who could take supervisory action such as requiring the Group to hold additional capital or directing the Group
to spend money to enhance its’ risk management systems and controls. The Group has been adversely affected
by weaknesses in risk management systems and controls in the recent past, with APRA requiring Westpac to hold
additional capital following the completion of its Compliance, Governance and Accountability self-assessment.
Inadequacies in addressing risks or in the Group’s risk management framework could also result in the Group failing
to meet a compliance obligation and/or financial losses.
If any of our governance or risk management processes and procedures prove ineffective or inadequate or are
otherwise not appropriately implemented, we could suffer unexpected losses and reputational damage which
could adversely affect our business, prospects, financial performance or financial condition.
For a discussion of our risk management procedures, refer to the ‘Risk management’ section.
The Group’s failure to recruit and retain key executives, employees and Directors may have adverse effects
on our business
Key executives, employees and Directors play an integral role in the operation of Westpac’s business and its pursuit
of its strategic objectives. The unexpected departure of an individual in a key role, or the Group’s failure to recruit
and retain appropriately skilled and qualified persons into these roles, could each have an adverse effect on our
business, prospects, reputation, financial performance or financial condition.
Climate change may have adverse effects on our business
We, our customers and external suppliers, may be adversely affected by the physical risks of climate change,
including increases in temperatures, sea levels, and the frequency and severity of adverse climatic events including
fires, storms, floods and droughts. These effects, whether acute or chronic in nature, may directly impact us and
our customers through reputational damage, environmental factors, insurance risk and business disruption and may
have an adverse impact on financial performance (including through an increase in defaults in credit exposures).
Initiatives to mitigate or respond to adverse impacts of climate change may impact market and asset prices,
economic activity, and customer behaviour, particularly in geographic locations and industry sectors adversely
affected by these changes. Failure to effectively manage these transition risks could adversely affect our business,
prospects, reputation, financial performance or financial condition.
1122019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Risk and risk management
We could suffer losses due to environmental factors
We and our customers operate businesses and hold assets in a diverse range of geographic locations. Any
significant environmental change or external event (including fire, storm, flood, earthquake, pandemic, civil unrest
or terrorism) in any of these locations has the potential to disrupt business activities, impact on our operations,
damage property and otherwise affect the value of assets held in the affected locations and our ability to recover
amounts owing to us. In addition, such an event could have an adverse impact on economic activity, consumer and
investor confidence, or the levels of volatility in financial markets, all of which could adversely affect our business,
prospects, financial performance or financial condition.
We could suffer losses due to insurance risk
We have exposure to insurance risk in our life insurance, general insurance and lenders mortgage insurance
businesses, which may adversely affect our business, operations or financial condition.
Insurance risk is the risk in our licensed regulated insurance entities of lapses being greater than expected, or
the costs of claims being greater than expected due to a failure in product design, underwriting, reinsurance
arrangements or an increase in the severity and/or frequency of insured events.
In the life insurance business, risk arises primarily through mortality (death) and morbidity (illness and injury) risks,
the costs of claims relating to those risks being greater than was anticipated when pricing those risks and policy
lapses (including through an unexpected or sustained increase in the rate of policy lapses).
In the general insurance business, insurance risk arises mainly through environmental factors (including storms,
floods and bushfires) and other calamities, such as earthquakes, tsunamis and volcanic activity, as well as general
variability in home and contents insurance claim amounts. The frequency and severity of external events such
as natural disasters is difficult to predict and it is possible that the amounts we reserve for potential losses from
existing events, such as those arising from natural disaster events, may not be adequate to cover actual claims that
may arise.
In the lenders mortgage insurance business, insurance risk arises primarily from unexpected downturns in
economic conditions leading to higher levels of mortgage defaults from unemployment or other economic factors.
If our reinsurance arrangements are ineffective, this could lead to greater risk, and more losses than anticipated.
There is also a risk that we will not be able to renew an expiring reinsurance arrangement on similar terms,
including in relation to the cost, duration and amount of reinsurance cover provided under that arrangement.
Changes in critical accounting estimates and judgements could expose the Group to losses
The Group is required to make estimates, assumptions and judgements when applying accounting policies and
preparing its financial statements, particularly in connection with the calculation of provisions (including those
related to remediations or credit losses) and the determination of the fair value of financial instruments. A change
in a critical accounting estimate, assumption and/or judgement resulting from new information or from changes in
circumstances or experience could result in the Group incurring losses greater than those anticipated or provided
for. This may have an adverse effect on the Group’s financial performance, financial condition and reputation. The
Group’s financial performance and financial condition may also be impacted by changes to accounting standards
or to generally accepted accounting principles.
We could suffer losses due to impairment of capitalised software, goodwill and other intangible assets
that may adversely affect our business, operations or financial condition
In certain circumstances Westpac may be exposed to a reduction in the value of intangible assets. As at
30 September 2019, Westpac carried goodwill principally related to its investments in Australia, other intangible
assets principally relating to assets recognised on acquisition of subsidiaries and capitalised software balances.
Westpac is required to assess the recoverability of the goodwill and other intangible asset balances on at least
an annual basis or wherever an indicator of impairment exists. For this purpose, Westpac uses a discounted cash
flow calculation. Changes in the methodology or assumptions upon which the calculation is based, together with
changes in expected future cash flows, could materially impact this assessment, resulting in the potential write-off
of part or all of the intangible assets.
In the event that an asset is no longer in use, or its value has been reduced or that its estimated useful life has
declined, an impairment will be recorded, adversely impacting the Group’s financial condition. The estimates and
assumptions used in assessing the useful life of an asset can be affected by a range of factors including changes in
strategy and the rate of external changes in technology and regulatory requirements.
We could suffer losses if we fail to syndicate or sell down underwritten securities
As a financial intermediary, we underwrite listed and unlisted debt and equity securities. Underwriting activities
include the development of solutions for corporate and institutional customers who need capital and investor
customers who have an appetite for certain investment products. We may guarantee the pricing and placement of
these facilities. We could suffer losses if we fail to syndicate or sell down our risk to other market participants. This
risk is more pronounced in times of heightened market volatility.
1132019 Westpac Group Annual Report
1
2
3
4
Risk and risk management
1
2
3
4
Certain strategic decisions may have adverse effects on our business
Westpac, at times, evaluates and may implement strategic decisions and objectives including diversification,
innovation, divestment or business expansion initiatives.
The expansion or integration of a new business, or entry into a new business, can be complex and costly and may
require Westpac to comply with additional local or foreign regulatory requirements which may carry additional
risks.
Westpac also acquires and invests in businesses owned and operated by external parties. These transactions
involve a number of risks for the Group. For example, Westpac may incur financial losses if a business it invests
in does not perform as anticipated or subsequently proves to be overvalued at the time that the transaction was
entered into.
In addition, we may be unable to successfully divest businesses or assets. These activities may, for a variety of
reasons, not deliver the anticipated positive business results and could have a negative impact on our business,
prospects, reputation, engagement with regulators, financial performance or financial condition.
Electing not to pursue a course of action can have an adverse effect on the Group. If Westpac fails to appropriately
respond to changes in the business environment it operates in (including changes related to economic, geopolitical,
regulatory, technological, social and competitive factors) this could have a range of adverse effects on the Group’s
business, such as being unable to increase or maintain market share as well as creating pressure on margins and
fees, any of which could have a negative impact on the Group’s business, prospects, financial performance or
financial condition.
Risk management
At Westpac, our risk management framework is designed to help achieve our vision to be one of the world’s great
service companies, helping our customers, communities and people to prosper and grow, sustainably and within
risk appetite. Our risk management strategy is to deliver effective risk management outcomes through the robust
execution of our risk management framework.
Effective risk management outcomes mean that we:
• deliver suitable, fair and clear outcomes for our customers that support market integrity;
• protect Westpac Group’s depositors, policyholders and investors by maintaining a balance sheet with sound
credit quality and buffers over regulatory minimums; and
• meet our regulatory and statutory obligations.
The Risk Management Framework (RMF) and Risk Management Strategy (RMS) is approved by the Board
following review and recommended by the Board Risk and Compliance Committee (BRCC) on an annual basis or
more frequently where required by a material business or strategy change or a material change to the Group’s risk
profile.
For further information regarding the role and responsibilities of the BRCC and other Board committees in managing
risk, refer to Westpac’s 2019 Corporate Governance Statement available at www.westpac.com.au/corpgov.
The Westpac Board (the Board) is ultimately responsible for our risk management framework and the oversight
of its operation by management. The Board has delegated the oversight of the RMF and its implementation to the
Chief Risk Officer (CRO) as the Accountable Executive.
The Chief Executive Officer (CEO) is the Accountable Executive for the RMS and oversees its implementation
by business units and functions, including in relation to customers, shareholders and Westpac employees and
contractors.
We adopt a Three Lines of Defence model to ensure we practice end-to-end management of risk, within which all
employees play an active role. This necessitates co-operation between businesses and functions, such that there
are no gaps in risk coverage.
Following the conclusion of the Culture, Governance and Accountability review conducted at the request of APRA,
Westpac is conducting a review of, and upgrades to, its end to end risk management capabilities. This is part of an
ongoing program of work that spans both financial and non-financial risk. Two of the key steps under this complex,
multi-year initiative are a renewed focus on the implementation of our three lines of defence model and the
implementation of a new Risk Management Framework, both of which are underway.
Westpac believes that investing in and enhancing end to end risk management capabilities are essential
imperatives. Recent reviews have identified various policies, systems, data, and risk capabilities which require
improvement. A detailed implementation plan is being designed to facilitate these improvements as soon as
possible, including hiring additional experts in areas such as operational risk, stress testing, modelling, financial
crime, risk systems and data management.
For a discussion of the risks to which Westpac is exposed, and its policies to manage these risks, refer to Westpac’s
Corporate Governance Statement and Note 21 to the financial statements.
1142019 Westpac Group Annual Report
Risk and risk management
Credit risk
Credit risk is the risk of financial loss where a customer or counterparty fails to meet their financial obligations to Westpac.
We have a framework and supporting policies for managing the credit risk associated with lending across our
business divisions. The framework and policies encompass all stages of the credit cycle – origination, evaluation,
approval, documentation, settlement, ongoing administration and problem management. For example, we have
established product-based standards for lending to individuals, with key controls including minimum serviceability
standards and maximum loan to security value ratios. We offer residential property loans to both owner-occupiers
and investors at both fixed and variable rates, secured by a mortgage over the property or other acceptable
collateral. Where we lend to higher loan to value ratios, we typically also require lenders mortgage insurance.
Similarly, we have established criteria for business, commercial, corporate and institutional lending, which can
vary by industry segment. In this area we focus on the performance of key financial risk ratios, including interest
coverage, debt serviceability and balance sheet structure. When providing finance to smaller business, commercial
and corporate borrowers we typically obtain security, such as a mortgage over property and/or a general security
agreement over business assets. For larger corporates and institutions, we typically also require compliance with
selected financial ratios and undertakings and may hold security. In respect of commercial property lending, we
maintain loan origination and ongoing risk management standards, including specialised management for higher
value loans. We consider factors such as the nature, location, quality and expected demand for the asset, tenancy
profile and experience and quality of management. We actively monitor the Australian and New Zealand property
markets and the composition of our commercial property loan book across the Group.
The extension of credit is underpinned by the Group’s Principles of Responsible Lending. This is reflected in our
commitment to comply with all local legislation, codes of practice and relevant guidelines and obligations to
market our products responsibly and stay in touch with the expectations of customers and the community.
Refer to Note 21 to the financial statements for details of our credit risk management policies.
Provisions for expected credit losses/impairment charges on loans
For information on the basis for determining the provision for expected credit losses/impairment charges on loans
refer to ‘Critical accounting assumptions and estimates’ in Note 13 to the financial statements.
Credit risk concentrations
We monitor our credit portfolio to manage risk concentrations. At 30 September 2019, our exposure to consumers
comprised 72% (2018: 72%, 2017: 72%) of our on-balance sheet loans and 59% (2018: 59%, 2017: 59%) of total credit
commitments. At 30 September 2019, 92% (2018: 92%, 2017: 92%) of our exposure to consumers was supported by
residential real estate mortgages. The consumer category includes owner-occupier and investment property loans
to individuals, credit cards, personal loans, overdrafts and lines of credit. Our consumer credit risks are diversified,
with substantial consumer market share in every state and territory in Australia, New Zealand and the Pacific
region. Moreover, these customers service their debts with incomes derived from a wide range of occupations, in
city as well as country areas.
Exposures to businesses, government and other financial institutions are classified into a number of industry
clusters based on groupings of related Australian and New Zealand Standard Industrial Classification (ANZSIC)
codes and are monitored against industry risk limits. The level of industry risk is measured and monitored on a
dynamic basis. We also control the concentration risks that can arise from large exposures to individual borrowers
1152019 Westpac Group Annual Report
1
2
3
4
Risk and risk management
1
2
3
4
Funding and liquidity risk
Funding and liquidity risk is the risk that Westpac cannot meet its payment obligations or that it does not have the
appropriate amount, tenor and composition of funding and liquidity to support its assets. Westpac has a Liquidity
Risk Management Framework which sets out Westpac’s funding and liquidity risk appetite, roles and responsibilities
of key people managing funding and liquidity risk within Westpac, risk reporting and control processes and limits
and targets used to manage Westpac’s balance sheet.
Refer to Note 21 to the financial statements for a more detailed discussion of our liquidity risk management policies.
Westpac debt programs and issuing shelves
Access in a timely and flexible manner to a diverse range of debt markets and investors is provided by the
following programs and issuing shelves as at 30 September 2019:
Program LimitIssuer(s)Program/Issuing Shelf Type
Australia
No limitWBCDebt Issuance Program
Euro Market
USD 2.5 billionWBCEuro Transferable Certificate of Deposit Program
USD 20 billionWBC/WSNZL
1
Euro Commercial Paper and Certificate of Deposit Program
USD 70 billionWBCEuro Medium Term Note Program
USD 10 billionWSNZL
1
Euro Medium Term Note Program
USD 40 billionWBC
2
Global Covered Bond Program
EUR 5 billionWSNZL
3
Global Covered Bond Program
Japan
JPY 750 billionWBCSamurai shelf
JPY 750 billionWBCUridashi shelf
United States
USD 45 billionWBCUS Commercial Paper Program
USD 10 billionWSNZL
1
US Commercial Paper Program
USD 35 billionWBCUS Medium Te
[TRUNCATED]
Data sourced from publicly available filings. Our datasets may not be complete. Automated analysis can produce errors. If you believe any data on this page is incorrect, please contact us at hello@nzxplorer.co.nz. For informational purposes only. Not investment advice.