Fonterra Shareholders' Fund logo

Fonterra releases Sustainability Report

ESG29 November 2019FSFConsumer Staples

FOR THE YEAR ENDING  JULY 
FONTERRA COOPERATIVE GROUP LIMITED

Sustainability

Report

We know when we work together
we can create goodness.

Our Co-operative is made up of amazing people,

our farmer owners, employees, and the people

we connect with in our communities.

Our Co-operative is stronger when we work

together, in the good times and in the tough

times. That’s the essence of our purpose:

OUR PURPOSE:

OUR VALUES:

OUR VALUES:

Co-operative

spirit

Do what’s

right

Make it

happen

Challenge

boundaries

Our Co-operative,

Empowering people

To create goodness for generations.

You, me, us together

Tātou, tātou.

Working

together for

tomorrow

Matt and Kathryn Roberts are both multi-

generational dairy farmers from Taranaki,

New Zealand, where they live with their

three children, Zara, Brianna and Aiden.

Starting as sharemilkers enabled them to

purchase their rst farm in   ­, before

moving onto their current farm in   €

where they are currently milking ­  cows.

 FONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT ƒ„…†

Healthy Environment
46

Healthy People

20

Healthy Business

76

Appendices

88

About this report

This report covers the activities of Fonterra Co-operative Group Limited and

of joint ventures under Fonterra’s management control. It covers economic,

social and environmental impacts for the year ending  July  – ‘FY’.

This report sits alongside our  Annual Report which sets out our

detailed …nancial performance.

www.fonterra.com/annualreport

In certain sections throughout the report, we have included data relating to periods

prior to FY where such data is relevant to, or useful context for the reader. Where

we have done so, we have made it clear which year(s) the data relates to.

This is our third stand-alone sustainability report (our …rst was in ‹) and we

intend to continue this reporting on an annual basis. This report has been prepared

in accordance with the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standards: Core option.

We have included an index of disclosures against the GRI standards on page.

The GRI Standards are the world’s most widely used standards for sustainability

reporting, enabling organisations to measure and report their most important

sustainability topics.

For more information see:

www.globalreporting.org

Independent assurance of the report has been completed by Bureau Veritas.

This provides assurance that the report complies with GRI Standards and provides

an accurate and fair representation of Fonterra’s sustainability performance.

Refer to the Assurance Statement on page.

We understand the importance of understanding stakeholder perspectives

so we’d appreciate your feedback on this report and our performance.

Please email us at sustainability@fonterra.com

Contents

24283031323436404244

Nutrition

and health

Food safety

and quality

In-school

nutrition

Trusted

Goodness

Our

people

Health, safety

and wellbeing

Employment

rights

Human

rights

Responsible

procurement

Supporting our

communities

0406081012141618

Letter

from the

Board Chair

and CEO

Letter

from the

Sustainability

Advisory Panel

About

Fonterra

Our

approach

Our

progress

Our

context

Our

strategy

Responding

to what's

important

80828486

Group

overview

Our

products

Employment

and income

creation

Creating

value

88909294

Our

contribution

to SDGs

GRI

standards

Assurance

statement

Associations and

memberships

50525456637074

Our

farming and

manufacturing

activities

Working

with farmers

Managing

operations

Land

and water

Climate

change

Packaging

and waste

Animal health

and biosecurity

Introduction

04

­€FONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT ƒ„…†FONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT ƒ„…†

FY ƒ was a year of significant challenges
and change for our Co-op as we continued

to fundamentally change the culture and

strategy of our organisation.

There’s no question about it, it’s been a tough year. We always

knew it was going to be, and should be pleased with the progress

we’ve made.

That might sound strange, given our performance this year, but

we are condent that when we look back at  a few years

from now, it will be to mark the beginning of a new period of

success for the Co-op.

Our Co-op is almost   years old. The decisions and progress

made in a number of areas will help to ensure we have a

sustainable, intergenerational business for another   years.

We started the process for change by looking at our Co-op’s

purpose. We did a lot of listening to people within the Co-op,

to our customers, partners and other stakeholders. They told

us that we need to show up di­erently, but also that this

Co-op’s intergenerational success was what motivated them.

Our new purpose is already guiding our decision making,

culture and behaviour as an organisation.

Our Co-operative, empowering people to create goodness

for generations. You, me, us together. Tātou, tātou.

Developing our new strategy was a key priority for the Board

and senior Management in FY. We started by thinking about

what we have learned from past decisions and agreeing what

we want our Co-op to stand for today.

Eighteen months ago, we may have said we’re a global dairy giant

here to make a di­erence in the lives of two billion people through

a volume ambition of ‡ billion litres of milk by .

Today, we stand for value. We’re a New Zealand dairy farmers’

co-op, doing smart, innovative things with New Zealand milk

to create value for our owners, customers, and communities.

This is the right strategy for us, but requires us to make some

di­erent choices.

We’ve looked at the opportunities and risks as a New Zealand

dairy co-op today. We’ve also taken a clinical look at what our

strengths and weaknesses really are, not what we’ve wanted

them to be.

We believe people will continue to seek out and pay a premium

for products backed by our unique provenance story – our Co-op

heritage, pasture-based New Zealand milk, backed by ethical and

sustainable farming practices. For that reason, we will prioritise

New Zealand milk, complemented by milk components sourced

o­shore only when required.

Part of putting sustainability at the core of everything we do was

the establishment of our Sustainability Advisory Panel this year.

They are a group of experts who play the role of our critical friends

as we respond to issues facing our Co-op and our industry now

and in the future. We welcomed them into our Co-op family with

a whakatau at our Fanshawe Street o’ce.

The Panel has told us that our strategy is solid and we are heading

in the right direction. Equally, it has challenged us to do more to

show leadership in taking the best of New Zealand dairy out to

the world.

It’s not going to be easy. Consumer habits are changing and

they have a growing number of nutritional options, many of

which claim to be more sustainable than dairy.

We have an opportunity to take what’s special about us

– our land, pasture-based farming model, our dairy and our

‘New Zealandness’, to show the world how dairy is part of

the future.

Letter from the

Board Chair and

Chief Executive

John Monaghan

Board Chair

Miles Hurrell

Chief Executive O’cer

Much of the change rests on the shoulders of our farmer owners,

who feel the weight of community expectations getting heavier.

For our part, the Co-op is already putting more energy and resources

into the development of on-farm tools, research and solutions

that will help them to run healthy and sustainable businesses.

We know we can’t do it alone. Our approach is to apply and share

our know-how, and by working with others, deliver technologies

and solutions that don’t exist today.

Most importantly, we’re asking for a clear and consistent

science-based approach. That means taking the emotion out of

these discussions – from both sides – and working constructively

towards the development of realistic policy and solutions.

We will measure the success of our strategy and approach

using triple bottom line reporting. We will measure the health

of our people, our environment, and our business. Each comes

with a number of performance targets, including return on

capital, greenhouse gas emissions, and the engagement levels

of our farmers and sta­.

You will see that this year’s report is laid-out across these three

reporting lines. It is our third year of producing a standalone

Sustainability Report and it continues to be a realistic appraisal

of our progress.

We are condent in our Co-op’s future, and energised about

continuing to evolve our Co-op so that it is here for the benet

of generations to come.

Injuries at work reduced to . per million work

hours, a world-class level for our industry

Net loss after tax

of New Zealand farms now have a Farm Environment

Plan with individually prioritised improvement actions

4.9

$

605m

23%

John Monaghan, Board Chair and

Miles Hurrell, Chief Executive O cer

…FONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 

Introduction

†FONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 

INTRODUCTION

BACK TO CONTENTS

It is my pleasure to introduce Fonterra’s
inaugural Sustainability Advisory Panel,

a group of independent experts who

have agreed to advise the Board and

senior leadership team on the company’s

roadmap towards a sustainable future.

Sustainability is an over-used and misunderstood expression.

For Fonterra, its sustainability ambitions are linked directly

with consumer value on one hand and an intergenerational

responsibility for land and what grows on it, on the other.

A determination not to exhaust the planet’s natural capital,

a concept already well understood by Fonterra’s farmers.

Today these challenges and opportunities, not constrained

by national boundaries, are converging in a con–uence of

unprecedented velocity. To name a few of them:

• Can we provide healthy nutrition for growing populations in a

way which regenerates not depletes, our natural environment?

• Can we continue to farm and operate in New Zealand with

the blessing and support, not the ire, of our communities?

• Can the farming sector re-build its reputation for being a

revered and esteemed sector of New Zealand society?

• Through deeper engagement with iwi, government, the nance

sector and communities can it accelerate change and create

enduring, value adding and low carbon businesses?

In a New Zealand context these represent the most complex set

of challenges and opportunities a business may ever confront.

Each Panelist comes with a respected reputation as an independent

thought leader. A strong technical background in their respective

area of expertise is balanced by a measure of commercial

experience that runs through the group. The Panel’s diversity

enables us to share wide-ranging perspectives across a broad range

of topics such as climate change and the environment, social

and cultural inclusion, farming, packaging, food and nutrition.

The company is midstream in its most profound strategic

reset since its inception and pressure on the company to

improve nancial performance is crucial. At a time of so much

change for both company and sector, the Board’s decision to

establish an independent and unrestricted panel was a bold

and innovative approach.

My Panel members and I thought very carefully before accepting

this role. More important than its appointment, how seriously

would the Panel be engaged? Can we make a di­erence? Can

values of sustainability be fully integrated into commercial

objectives and be at the core of Fonterra’s future strategy?

In its relatively short history, the Panel has been highly productive.

The Fonterra Board, CEO and management team have openly

and proactively engaged with the Panel on a regular basis and

have sought guidance and fresh insights on the many strategic

issues they face. Issues of climate change, and economic, social

and environmental sustainability are urgent and command full

attention at the most senior levels of every enterprise.

With such open access to Fonterra’s decision makers, the Panel

has a unique opportunity to work alongside the management

team to create value for all stakeholders. We have critiqued

the company’s targets on several fronts and have brought an

international perspective to a number of issues.

For management and the Board, I am hopeful that the Panel

will come to be regarded as a “critical friend” to them and the

business. This will come over time and through the evolution

of a trustworthy relationship based on a belief in Fonterra’s

success. I thank my fellow Panelists, and I congratulate the

work of Fonterra’s sustainability team who are doing a great

job within the company.

Rob Fenwick

Chair, Fonterra Sustainability Panel

Letter from the

Sustainability

Advisory Panel

Hugh Logan

Hugh Logan has €‚ years’ experience in

natural resource management. He is chair

of Environment Canterbury’s regional water

management committee and has previously

chaired the Land and Water Forum. He was

a public service Chief Executive for †† years

heading the Ministry for the Environment and

the Department of Conservation. Hugh is also

experienced in international environmental

aˆairs, heading New Zealand delegations

to the IUCN and Convention on Biological

Diversity, and OECD reviews of New Zealand’s

environmental administration.

Sir Rob Fenwick, Chair

Sir Rob Fenwick is the ’rst New Zealander

knighted for services to both business and

conservation. He co-founded the Aotearoa

Circle and New Zealand Business Council for

Sustainable Development and New Zealand's

’rst commercial composting business, Living

Earth. Sir Rob has an honorary doctorate in

Natural Resources from Lincoln University.

He was •‚†– Sir Peter Blake Medallist and

•‚†˜ NZ Business Hall of Fame inductee.

Sir Rob has sustainability advisory roles for

Air NZ, Westpac and Waste Management

NZ and is a director of Ngāti Whātua o Ōrākei’s

commercial holdings and Te Papa. He has

had leadership responsibilities in Predator

Free New Zealand, the Order of St John,

New Zealand Antarctic Research program

and Save the Kiwi Trust.

Bridget Coates

Bridget Coates is a Director of Tegel Group

Holdings Ltd. and Chairperson of Real Estate

Institute of New Zealand. Until recently,

she was a Director of the Reserve Bank of

New Zealand. Bridget was the founder

of private company, White Cloud Dairy

Innovation, which marketed high quality

New Zealand dairy and plant proteins and

other nutritional products to US consumers.

Bridget has also held Board governance

roles including with the New Zealand

Superannuation Fund, Sky City Limited and

Fisher & Paykel Appliances Holdings Ltd., and

with New York-based •†• Equity Management

LLC, a private equity company. She was

formerly CEO of Carter Holt Harvey Plastic

Products and Director of Research for CS

First Boston NZ Ltd.

Paul Gilding

Paul Gilding has over €‚ years of experience

across a range of industries. He is a Fellow at

the University of Cambridge’s Institute for

Sustainability Leadership, where he is exploring

the inherent market disruption in transforming

the global economy to address system wide

sustainability risks. His book “The Great

Disruption” has been widely acclaimed. He

has been CEO of a range of innovative social

enterprises and NGOs including Greenpeace

International, Ecos Corporation and Easy

Being Green. As a corporate advisor he has

worked with the Boards and Executives of many

companies including Unilever, BHP Billiton,

Royal DSM, DuPont and Ford Motor Company.

Michelle Pye

Michelle Pye is a Fonterra shareholder

and, with her husband Leighton, owns and

operates Pye Group, a large scale cross

sector agricultural business based in South

Canterbury. Within the Pye Group, the dairy

business consists of nine dairy farms milking

over ¤,‚‚‚ cows. Michelle worked for

ten years, predominately for rural-based

chartered accountants before working

fulltime with Pye Group. Since •‚†˜ Michelle

has been the South Canterbury representative

on the Fonterra Shareholdersʼ Council.

Aroha Te Pareake Mead

Aroha Te Pareake Mead (Ngāti Awa, Ngāti

Porou) is a Research Associate specialising

in mātauranga - Māori ̈indigenous knowledge,

biocultural heritage, and indigenous cultural

and intellectual property rights. Aroha is

on the Kahui Māori of Genomics Aotearoa

and member of Science Leadership Team of

the Biological Heritage Science Challenge.

Her previous roles include being Director of

Māori Business in the Management School

of Victoria University of Wellington, Policy

Manager and Policy Principal with Te Puni

Kokiri (Cultural Heritage & Indigenous Issues

Unit). She has also ful’lled multiple roles

for the International Union for Conservation

of Nature and served on the Greenpeace

New Zealand Board.

The role of the panel:

The Fonterra Sustainability Advisory Panel was established in •‚†ª,

with the ’rst meeting in October •‚†ª. The role of the Panel is to:

. Review and provide feedback and advice to the Board on

Fonterra’s strategy, targets and initiatives as they relate

to economic, social and environmental sustainability;

. Provide credible, independent expertise and guidance to

the Board to improve performance and outcomes in relation

to sustainability; and

‡. Present to the Board on advice andžor issues that relate

to sustainability and a­ect Fonterra.

Members - from left to right

’FONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 

Introduction

“FONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 

INTRODUCTION

BACK TO CONTENTS

Fonterra is a New Zealand-based dairy
co-operative which brings together

farmers to care for people and the

land through generations.

Dairying is a big part of New Zealand and has been for almost

  years. Farming families have made the most of being able

to grow grass all year-round, producing delicious, fresh milk.

From our home in New Zealand, we make high-quality dairy

ingredients, foodservice and consumer dairy products, which

are sold in more than ‡ countries.

Our range of dairy ingredients are sold under our NZMP™ brand

and can be found in famous food and nutrition brands around

the world.

Under our Anchor™ Food Professionals brand we create high

quality, t-for-purpose products and solutions for foodservice

professionals in over   countries.

We also manufacture, market and distribute our own consumer

products. These products include branded dairy products sold

direct to consumers, such as milk, milk powders, yoghurt, butter

and cheese. Our three global consumer brands are Anchor™,

Anlene™ and Anmum™.

For more information on our products, please refer to

Our Products on page .

Our Brands

About

Fonterra

Global Revenue: $20.1b

FY •: –­—.†b

Global data FY •FY ƒ

Employees (FTE)••,«–ªƒ„,’“”

Manufacturing sites

…

–†–“

Farmgate Milk Price (per kgMS)

paid to shareholder farmers

¬˜.˜¤ —’.˜”

Revenue¬•‚.€b —ƒ„.…b

Net loss after tax ¬†¤˜m—’„”m

Normalised EBIT ¬¤‚•m —“…†m

Normalised earnings per share‚.•€c „.…šc

Normalised operating expenses ¬•,€¤˜m —ƒ,˜……m

Capital expenditure ¬ª˜†m —’„„m

Return on capital

ƒ

˜.«® ”.“›

Economic value distributed

FY •

(– million)

FY ƒ

(– million)

Payment to suppliers (farmers)

for NZ-sourced milk

†‚,††–†,š–“

Payment to suppliers (farmers)

for non-NZ sourced milk

†,•€–†’’

Tax expense

€

€• …šš

Prožt after tax attributable

to shareholders

••† loss

(earnings of

-¬‚.†€ per

share)

””š loss

(earnings of

-¬‚.«– per

share)

Dividend payment to equity holders

of the Co-operative

†˜†

(dividend of

¬‚.†‚ per share)

„

(no dividend

paid)

For our full nancial results, please refer to our Annual Report:

www.fonterra.comannualreport

EUROPE

—“”…m

REVENUE

…

MANUFACTURING

SITE

END FY…“

¬˜ª†m Revenue

† Manufacturing site

REST OF ASIA

—”.”†b

REVENUE

–

MANUFACTURING

SITES

END FY…“

¬–.˜ªb Revenue

€ Manufacturing sites

AUSTRALIA

—….š“b

REVENUE

š

MANUFACTURING

SITES

END FY…“

¬†.ª€b Revenue

̄ Manufacturing sites

NEW ZEALAND

—ƒ.…“b

REVENUE

Ġ

MANUFACTURING

SITES

END FY…“

¬•.‚ªb Revenue

«‚ Manufacturing sites

UNITED STATES

—†˜…m

REVENUE

END FY…“

¬ ̄¤«m Revenue

REST OF WORLD

—ƒ.˜’b

REVENUE

ƒ

MANUFACTURING

SITES

END FY…“

¬«.†•b Revenue

• Manufacturing sites

LATIN AMERICA

¢CHILE, BRAZIL£

—ƒ.…˜b

REVENUE

”

MANUFACTURING

SITES

END FY…“

¬•.• ̄b Revenue

̄ Manufacturing sites

 This is the number of manufacturing sites under Fonterra management control

at the end of FY. Down on FY due to divestments that occurred during the year.

 Return on capital excluding brands, goodwill and equity-accounted investments

was ƒ.„… (down from .…).

ˆ See www.fonterra.comtaxprinciples for details on our approach to tax.

CHINA

—–.ƒ†b

REVENUE

END FY…“

¬«.¤ªb Revenue

ƒFONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 

Introduction

•FONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 

INTRODUCTION

BACK TO CONTENTS

A sustainable future for our Co-operative is
core to our new strategy – it’s how we create

long-term value for future generations.

Our new strategy integrates sustainability into our thinking

and takes a triple-bottom-line approach to our Co-operative

way of doing things.

FY was a tough year and required tough decisions. Despite this,

we have continued to recognise the importance of sustainability.

We outline our approach here and our progress towards key

targets on the next page. While progress is not as strong as

we would like, we are pleased that we have continued to make

progress during the year.

We have three overarching goals and this report is structured

to re–ect these:

Healthy people:

We are working together to care for people and make

a positive social impact.

He aha te mea nui o te ao.

He tāngata, he tāngata, he tāngata.

What is the most important thing in the world?

It is people, it is people, it is people.

Healthy environment:

We are working together to achieve a healthy environment

for farming and society.

Tiakina te whenua i tēnei rā, hei oranga tangata

mō ngā rā e heke mai nei.

Caring for the land today, so that the land cares for us tomorrow.

Healthy business:

We are working together to deliver a sustainable business.

Nā tō rourou, nā taku rourou ka ora ai te iwi.

With your contribution and my contribution, we’ll all thrive together.

Our

approach

Support healthy, sustainable livelihoods for

our farmers by returning the most value from every

drop of milk.

Build a strong co-operative by ensuring our business,

including investments, delivers long-term value.

Meet the changing needs of customers and consumers

by leveraging our unique strengths and innovating to

create sustainable value for them and us.

Improve the health and biodiversity of our land and

waters by having a regenerative mindset, reducing the

impacts of farming and manufacturing, and working in

partnership with others.

Lead the transition to a low-carbon future by investing

in innovation and infrastructure to remove greenhouse

gas emissions from our supply chain.

Meet the growing nutritional demand through

improvements in productivity and minimising waste

from farm to consumer.

Address public health challenges by improving the

nutritional prole of our products and promoting

healthy diets.

Provide positive employment for our people by

promoting a healthy and safe working environment

and developing a diverse, skilled and agile workforce.

Improve the health of our communities by doing

business in the right way, sharing what we do best and

playing our part to build resilient, sustainable communities.

Environment

Key global targets


•‚•–: All New Zealand farms have an FEP.


•‚•–: All packaging recyclable, reusable or compostable.


•‚•–: Zero waste to land’ll.


•‚«‚: «‚® reduction in GHG emissions for

manufacturing operations.


•‚«‚: «‚® reduction in water use at sites in

water-stressed regions.

Key global targets


•‚••: •.–x – «.–x Debt ̈EBITDA.


•‚•€: †‚® return on capital.


•‚•€: –‚c earnings per share.


•‚•€: ¬†,‚–‚m free cash ±ow.

FY…† – Key items

• Injury rate reduced to world class level.

• Health Star Ratings on ¤•® of our applicable

products in New Zealand.

• Gender pay ratio widened †® in New Zealand but

remains well above national average.

FY…† – Key items

• •«® of Fonterra farms in New Zealand now have a

Farm Environment Plan (FEP).

• Brightwater site went live co-’ring biomass.

• New targets set for water, packaging and solid waste.

FY…† – Key items

• ¬†‚ billion paid to New Zealand shareholder farmers.

• Financial discipline resulted in lower operating

expenditure, reduced capital expenditure, improved

cash ±ow and lower debt.

• Signi’cant one-oˆ adverse items resulting in a net loss

of ¬˜‚–m.

Healthy BusinessHealthy PeopleHealthy Environment

Long-term contribution Long-term contribution Long-term contribution

Key global targets


World-class injury prevention.


World-class engagement.


•‚†¤: †‚‚® sites certi’ed to leading food, safety

and quality level.


•‚••: –‚® female representation in senior leadership.


•‚•–: †‚‚® product portfolio meeting endorsed

nutrition guidelines.

 —  FONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT  FONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 

Introduction

INTRODUCTION

BACK TO CONTENTS

Our progress
 All targets are global unless stated otherwise (e.g. NZ). New targets set this year for water use and packaging not included yet.

 All targets are by the end of the calendar year stated.

Core Indicators



Target



PerformanceSee page

FY‰ŠFY‰‹FY‰Œ

Healthy People – To care for people and make a positive social impact

Percentage of everyday and advanced nutrition products that meet

endorsed nutritional guidelines. Fonterra consumer branded products

š”› by •‚•‚

…„„› by •‚•–

–¢£“•œ

Page ­†

Total recordable injury frequency rate (TRIFR) per million work hoursWorld-class (³–) .¤.†.ƒ

Page ۠

Employee engagement

World-class

(Top quartile)

‡.¥ 

nd lowest quartile

¦.

nd highest quartile

†.—’

nd highest quartile

Page ۥ

Percentage of manufacturing sites certi’ed by an independent third party

to leading food safety management system (e.g. FSSC••‚‚‚)

…„„› by •‚†¤¥££ƒ­œ

Page ­•

Female representation in senior leadership

”„›

by •‚••

‡£‡£­ƒœ

Page ۥ

Ethnic representation in senior leadership

ƒ„›

by •‚••

–£ƒœ

Page ۥ

Healthy Environment

– To achieve a healthy environment for farming and society

Farm Environment Plans (FEPs) (NZ)

…„„›

by  

–£­€œ

Page …•

Reduction in absolute manufacturing GHG emissions from FY†– baseline

˜„›

reduction by ‡

¦.¤£

reduction on FY 

. £

reduction on FY 

€.…œ

reduction on FY …

Page “…

Net change in GHG emissions from dairy farming since †€ ̈†– (NZ)

(Pre-farm gate tCO

•

-e)

Neutral

to ‡

‡¢,

reduction on ¦ž 

,¢¦,

reduction on ¦ž 

•“†,———

reduction on  †ž …

Page Ҡ

Manufacturing sites treating wastewater to leading industry standards

…„„›

by ¤

 £¤£­ƒœ

Page …•

Solid waste to land’ll

„ MT

by  

 ,‡¤,¥¦ …,ƒ— 

Page ’ 

Healthy Business

– To deliver a sustainable business

Return on capital

“.”› by end FY

…„› by end FY¦

¥.‡£¤.‡£….•œ

Page •…

Earnings per share

–„c by end FY

”„c by end FY¦

¦c¦c ’c

Page •…

Free cash ±ow

—†„„m by end FY

—…,„”„m by end FY¦

§¤¢m§¤m–“ƒƒm

Page •…

Debt ̈EBITDAƒ.” - ˜.”x by end FY‡. x¦. x†.€x

Page •…


FY performance is evaluated relative to FY:

Good progress.

Some progress or slight delay. O— track.

For Healthy Business indicators FY represents a new baseline.

 ­ €FONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT  FONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 

Introduction

INTRODUCTION

BACK TO CONTENTS

We operate in a challenging
global environment where

food is at the centre of many

sustainability issues.

The world needs to transform the way it produces

and consumes food so that people have access to

su cient good nutrition, while regenerating the

environment and returning decent livelihoods to

farmers in the rural communities.

Our farmer shareholders in New Zealand produce

nutrition from the land, which we turn into food

that is exported and valued by the world.

This presents us with challenges and opportunities

to make a diˆerence to New Zealand and the world.

Sustainable diets will involve diˆerent food sources

ful’lling diˆerent roles and dairy is identi’ed as

playing a part in that. Dairy is a source of high-

quality nutrition which, if produced e ciently and

responsibly, can help improve the management of

ecosystems while enhancing rural livelihoods.

Our

context

• An ageing and growing population that's

expected to reach ª.– billion by •‚«‚.

• Human activity consuming

resources beyond planetary limits.

• Nutritionally poor diets impacting

population health.

• Rising incomes, changing lifestyles.

• Increased consumer interest in natural,

healthy, plant-based, ethical foods.

Take a lead in dairy’s role in sustainable

diets around the world – securing a positive

future for our farming families.

Support farmers and communities as

we work together to regenerate our

natural environment.

Build a strong, sustainable co-op that is

a national champion of New Zealand’s

role in providing sustainable food

for the world.

GLOBAL TRENDS

OUR

OPPORTUNITY

WHAT THE

WORLD NEEDS

Transition global food production to

provide access to healthy nutrition

for people around the world in a

way that regenerates the planet and

returns decent livelihoods to

all those involved

in producing it.

Help New Zealand meet it’s

commitment to keeping global warming

below †.– °C and maintain leadership as

a climate-efficient dairy producer.

Reverse declining environmental health

by playing our part on-farm and in

our operations.

Build stakeholder trust by delivering

against our triple bottom line

commitments.

OUR LOCAL

CHALLENGES

 † …FONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT  FONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 

INTRODUCTION

Introduction

BACK TO CONTENTS

WE WILL CONCENTRATE ON THESE
CONSUMPTION CATEGORIES:

CORE DAIRY

FOODSERVICE

PAEDIATRICS

SPORTS & ACTIVE

MEDICAL & HEALTHY AGEING

Demand for dairy will

remain strong. Changing

global trends support this.

Sustainability

Naturalness

Authenticity & Provenance

Healthy Living

Out of Home

Creating sustainable

value from our farmers’

New Zealand milk

We will match our

unique strengths

to consumer needs

To enhance lives, and

create value for our

farmers and customers

In September ­— ƒ we launched our

new Co-operative strategy with

sustainability at its heart.

This followed a thorough review into all areas of our business,

considering everything in our portfolio and the local and

global context we work in.

Our new strategy represents a fundamental change, moving

us away from our previous volume ambition to focus on value.

It recognises our Co-operative heritage and strengths, our

farmers and their families, and the dairy they produce and it

will take that goodness to the world.

The world needs dairy, and demand for our New Zealand milk will

continue to grow. Global trends are towards more natural foods,

and towards consumers wanting to know more about where

their food comes from, how it is made, and what impact it has

on the environment and communities.

Our Co-op has unique strengths to meet these needs. Our

milk provides nutrition around the world, and our New Zealand

pasture-based farming systems produce it in a natural, e’cient

way that is valued by customers and consumers. We have world-

leading innovation capability, dairy know-how, and customer

relationships which enable us to drive change and show the

world how dairy is part of a better future together.

Our new direction is driven by our clear identity as a New Zealand

dairy co-op that does amazing things with our farmers’ milk,

enhancing lives and creating value for customers and farmers.

Our new strategy

Our strategy is to match our unique strengths to consumer

needs. Doing this will create sustainable value from our farmers’

New Zealand milk, by connecting what our farmers do on farm,

to what our customers value.

Our aim is to continue being globally competitive in Core Dairy

(base and advanced ingredients), while growing in the categories

of Paediatrics, Sports and Active, Foodservice and Medical and

Healthy Ageing. Consumer brands will be a smaller part of our

portfolio targeted where we can create superior value.

We will do this by linking our strategy to our purpose and

values, changing our behaviours and actions, and di­erentiating

ourselves through:

Innovation

To create superior value for our customers and our Co-operative.

Sustainability

To do what is right for the long term good and to meet consumer

and community needs.

E¡ciency

To unlock and create greater value from our scale and e’ciency.

Integrating Sustainability

Our objective is to create a successful and sustainable

Co-operative that delivers positive social, environmental

and economic outcomes. Our new strategy integrates a triple-

bottom-line approach into our Co-operative way of doing

things and we are clear that our overarching goals are:

Healthy People:

To care for people and make a positive social impact.

Healthy Environment:

To achieve a healthy environment for farming and society.

Healthy Business:

To deliver a sustainable business.

We have been reporting our social and environmental

performance for a number of years and this report is our third

annual sustainability report independently assured against Global

Reporting Initiative (GRI) standards. This year we have structured

the report to re–ect these overarching goals.

We are taking this approach to measuring performance across

our Co-operative, and have built this into our employee objective

setting, reward and recognition processes.

Our

strategy

 ’FONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 

Introduction

 “FONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 

BACK TO CONTENTS

Responding to
what’s important

Engaging with our stakeholders

Taking into account the views and perspectives of our stakeholders,

and building relationships, is critical to the long-term success of

our Co-operative. We consider our stakeholders to be those

individuals or entities that are signicantly impacted by our

products and the activities required to source, make and distribute

these or whose actions a­ect our ability to deliver our strategy.

Farmers:

(Our farmer shareholders,

sharemilkers, other supplying

farmers and their employees)

We engage with our New Zealand farmer shareholders at

meetings and roadshows, and through the formal governance

processes of our Co-operative. We also engage with farmers,

sharemilkers and farm employees on an ongoing basis led by our

Area Managers and Sustainable Dairying Advisors or equivalent.

Customers

and consumers:

We engage with our business-to-business customers on an

ongoing basis through our account management teams and by

sharing information through programmes such as SEDEX and

the Carbon Disclosure Project. Our engagement with customers

provides us with insight on their consumers and we engage with

our own direct consumers through our service teams, email and

social media, and consumer research.

Employees:

We engage with our employees on an ongoing basis through

our everyday interactions, regular engagement surveys and

engagement with unions.

Investors:

(Including unit holders, bond

holders and banks)

We engage with our investors on a regular basis through

updates, formal reporting and meetings coordinated by our

Capital Markets team. We also share information through this

report and the Carbon Disclosure Project.

Central and

regional governments:

We engage with central and regional governments, through

our Government and Stakeholders Aˆairs team. We also work

in partnership on issues such as climate change (Pastoral

Greenhouse Gas Research Consortium), NZ Water (Department

of Conservation), and children’s wellbeing (Ministry of Social

Development).

NGOs:

We engage with other non-governmental organisations (NGOs)

through collaboration and consultation on speci’c topics, (e.g.

the New Zealand Nutrition Foundation on nutrition guidelines).

Vendors:

We engage with our non-milk vendors on an ongoing basis

led by our Group Procurement team. For larger vendors the

engagement includes regularly meetings managed by the

Vendor Manager or Category Manager.

This year, we refreshed our materiality

assessment. Starting from the results

of previous assessments, we researched

other potential topics of importance from

sources such as industry guidance and

reports, customer reports and emerging

issues from risk assessments and external

communications. This generated a long list

of topics which we clustered into a set of

topics at a common level of granularity

for further analysis.

The relative importance of the topics to

our stakeholder groups was determined by

a combination of speci’c surveying, ’ndings

of speci’c engagement workshops and

interviewing owners of existing relationships.

The ’ndings for each stakeholder group

were combined into an overall ordered list

of importance, treating all stakeholder

groups on an equal basis.

We assessed the signi’cance of our impact on

society for each topic by considering both the

positive and negative impact of our activities

against four criteria: the extent of our impact

(i.e. local, regional, global), the magnitude

of our impact and the duration of our impact.

Using the combination of importance to

stakeholders and the signi’cance of our

impact we generated an order list of topics

which was discussed with our Sustainability

Advisory Panel and approved by the Fonterra

Management team.

The table on the left lists the most important

topics, in order, and identi’es where we cover

our response in this report. Further details on

the process and results are available:

www.fonterra.com‰

 Š‹MaterialityAssessmentNotes

Determining what’s important

 For more information see www.fonterra.comGovernanceEthicalBusinessNotes

Our material topics

Ensuring the food safety and quality of the products we deliver.

See Food safety and quality on page 

Using water responsibly, including water quality and availability.

See Land and water on page 

Climate change mitigation and adaption.

See Climate change on page 

Contributing to local economies through meaningful employment and

sustainable income creation, including the milk price for our farmers.

See Employment and income creation on page 

Protecting the health and safety of people at work, including their wellbeing.

See Health, safety and wellbeing on page 

Contributing to nutrition and health through the products and information

we deliver, including obesity and under-nutrition.

See Nutrition and health on page 

Ethical business practices, including anti-corruption and fair competition.

See Ethical business practices in appendix Governance and ethical business




Protecting the human rights of individuals impacted by our business actions.

See Human rights on page 

Protecting animal health and welfare within our supply chain, including

responsible use of antibiotics.

See Animal health and biosecutiry on page 

Protecting soil health which is essential for sustainable food production.

See Land and water on page 

Using responsible procurement to in¥uence environmental, social and

economic performance along our supply chain.

See Responsible procurement on page 

Protecting biodiversity and the underlying ecosystem services

we rely upon, including the impact of deforestation.

See Land and water on page , see Responsible procurement on page 

Protecting the employment rights and working conditions of our people,

including diversity and inclusion, training and development.

See Employment rights on page 

Addressing biosecurity risks to animal, plant and human health.

See Animal health and biosecurity on page 

Minimising production waste, including solid waste to land§ll.

See Packaging and waste on page 

Minimising post-consumption waste, including product packaging

and food waste.

See Packaging and waste on page 

 ƒFONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 

Introduction

 •FONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 

INTRODUCTION

BACK TO CONTENTS

In this section:
24

Nutrition and health

28

Food safety and quality

34

Health and safety

36

Employment rights

40

Human rights

42

Responsible procurement

44

Supporting communities

We are working

together to care for

people and make a

positive impact

on society.

Our products help people eat

balanced diets and we’re using our scale

and know-how to respond to people’s

changing needs, attitudes and lifestyles.

We’re looking after people’s safety

and wellbeing, providing employees

with development opportunities

and supporting the communities

we live and work in.

It’s all part of making sure dairy plays

its part in a sustainable food system.

Healthy

People

He aha te mea nui o te ao

He tāngata, he tāngata, he tāngata.

What is the most important thing in the world?

It is people, it is people, it is people.

Healthy People

21FONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT ā12320FONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT ā123

BACK TO CONTENTS

Healthy
People

Caring for people is at the core

of our Co-operative.

We’re mindful of the impact our scale and reach can have

on people’s diets, their livelihoods and society as a whole.

From providing safe and healthy nutrition, through the way

we care for our farmers and employees throughout our value

chain, to the way we support our local communities at home

and abroad.

Caring for farmers

We support farmers by providing sustainable incomes and

standing shoulder-to-shoulder with them to support them

through changes – o­ering tools, services, and help to run

sustainable farming businesses.

Caring for employees

We care for our employees by focusing on their health, safety

and wellbeing, respecting the strength their diversity brings,

and giving them opportunities to develop and progress at work.

Caring for consumers

We provide consumers with safe and nutritious food – whether

that’s through our own consumer products, or in partnership with

our customers through the ingredients we provide. We support

them and their families to have healthy, enjoyable, and sustainable

diets now and into the future.

Caring for communities

We care for our communities through our everyday business

activities – doing what’s right in the way we operate and

providing employment and livelihoods. We also demonstrate

this by investing resources and time into activities that make

a di­erence for our local communities, including community

and in-school nutrition programmes.

How Fonterra is making this happen

We are working together to care for people and make

a positive impact on society. To do this we will:

Address public health challenges by improving the

nutritional prole of our products and promoting healthy diets

Provide positive employment for our people by promoting

a healthy and safe working environment and developing a

diverse, skilled and agile workforce

Improve the health of our communities by doing business in

the right way, sharing what we do best and playing our part to

build resilient, sustainable communities.

• Healthier nutrition: We’ve rolled out Health

Star Ratings on ‚ƒ of our applicable products

in New Zealand – see page 

• Food safety certižcation: ‚ƒ of our manufacturing

sites are independently certi†ed to a leading food

safety management system – see page 

• Gender pay: Gender pay ratio (F‰M

‹

): – see page 

New Zealand ‘. ’ ‰ Australia ‘. ‚ (mean)

New Zealand ‘. ” ‰ Australia ‘. ” (median)

• Health and safety: Injury rate for sta•, contractors

and visitors to our sites reduced to world class level

(. per million hours worked) – see page 

• Addressing family violence: Our support package

for employees impacted by family violence is already

making a di•erence – see page 

• Sustainable procurement: —.’ƒ of our PKE

‚


purchases are traceable to mill and we are

continuing to transition to certi†ed supply of

segregated palm oil products – see page 

KEY ITEMS FROM FY‹Œ

 Ratio of female pay to male pay with . indicating equity and less than . indicating

females paid less.

 PKE – palm kernel expeller, is a by-product of the palm oil industry. It is used by farmers

as a supplemental animal feed.

Fonterra’s contribution to the SDGs

from a healthy people perspective.

Create positive employment

opportunities along our value

chain ( . )

Share our dairy expertise

with small-scale producers ( .)

Responsibly provide products to

support wellbeing of mothers and

infants (. and . )



Promote healthy and informed

consumer choices (.)

Continue to improve the nutritional

prole of our products (.)

Share our dairy expertise with female

small-scale producers (.)

Ensure equal participation and

opportunity for women in our

workforce (.)

Provide positive and inclusive

employment for all groups (‚.)

Address labour and human rights issues

in our supply chain (‚.„, ‚.‚)

Provide a safe and secure working

environment (‚.‚)

 See page Œ for our position on the responsible

promotion of breast milk substitutes.

Healthy People

­€FONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 

HEALTHY PEOPLE

­­FONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 

BACK TO CONTENTS

Nutrition
and health

Good nutrition is essential for people

to lead healthy and fulfilling lives.

Our dairy products can play a valuable role in addressing

deciencies in diets and improving the health and wellbeing

of people around the world.

More than ¥ million people in the world are still hungry and

hunger is rising in Africa, Latin America and Western Asia.

For two billion people, lack of regular access to nutritious food

increases their risk of poor health. In the case of pregnant women,

this risk passes to their child. In  , .  million babies were

born with low birthweight, placing them at a higher risk of dying

in their rst month, su­ering from stunted growth and adult-onset

chronic conditions including obesity and diabetes.

The trends for overweight and obesity are equally concerning, rising

in all regions and contributing to four million deaths globally.

As a food company, we recognise the valuable role dairy products

can play in addressing deciencies in diets and improving health and

wellbeing for people around the world. This section covers our global

approach to nutrition and its contribution to health and wellbeing.

Our approach

The Fonterra Group Nutrition Policy sets out our overarching

commitments to deliver highly nutritious dairy products to the

world and market these in a responsible manner. The policy is

supported by detailed guidelines that dene nutrition criteria

for the composition of products across all branded consumer

products and ingredients.

The New Zealand Nutrition Foundation has independently

reviewed and endorsed these guidelines as evidence-based,

founded in robust nutritional science and re–ecting international

directives on nutrition and health. These guidelines complement

national food standards and regulations, as well as our own

education and advocacy activities to raise awareness of the value

of dairy nutrition in healthy, balanced diets.

We support the aim and intent of the WHO Code for the Marketing

of Breast Milk Substitutes and are committed to complying with the

relevant industry codes and legislation in all countries where our

products targeting infants and young children are sold.

We have established a Global Nutrition Council which is responsible

for governing our nutrition policy, standards and guidelines and

overseeing the nutrition performance of our portfolio.

Developing a©ordable nutrition

We started piloting an a­ordable nutrition product in Ethiopia

this year called Anmit™, an abbreviation of Anchor™ and Atmit.

Atmit is an Ethiopean grain and dairy mixture like a drinkable

porridge that can traditionally take up to a week to prepare, but

our Anmit product delivers the goodness in just two minutes.

Developed with local stakeholders, including the Ethiopian Food

and Nutrition Society, it is fortied with nutrients tailored to local

needs and delivered at an a­ordable price.

Investigating complementary nutrition

Dairy is a unique source of nutrition: a complex mix of proteins,

fats, lactose, minerals and other micronutrients with the –exibility

to play an important role in healthy, balanced diets as recognised

by governments and health experts around the world. Consumers

value the natural goodness of dairy, especially our pasture-based

dairy from New Zealand and we are condent they will continue

to purchase it as a premium source of nutrition.

We’re continuing to investigate the potential of complementary

nutrition sources such as plant and fermentation-produced

nutrition. This involves working with a wide range of world-leading

organisations, including research institutes and start-ups, and in

FY we invested in US-based food company Motif™ Ingredients.

Over time, these complementary ingredients may play a role

in our business alongside our core dairy business, to give more

options to customers and consumers, and help meet global

demand for food.

Supporting action on health

We are committed to identifying and contributing solutions that

aim to help improve health outcomes for children in New Zealand.

This year, we continued to deliver in-school nutrition (see page ),

and for our everyday products, we’ve now rolled out Health Star

Ratings on £ of our applicable



products.

In Australia, we have published a summary of our nutrition

commitments. This includes specic details for our ‘everyday’

foods which are part of the dairy food group in the Australian

Dietary Guidelines. Our commitments cover serving size, sugars,

sodium, fat, colours, –avours and sweeteners.

Compliance with regulations

In the past year, we received no new nes or penalties for

breaches of marketing regulations.

What we’ve been doing

Investing in innovation

The Fonterra Research and Development Centre (FRDC) is one of the

largest of its kind in the world, with over ‡ scientic and technical

experts, including approximately  with PhDs. It’s here that we

invest signicantly in innovation, driving scientically-supported

benets from dairy to meet the nutritional needs and expectations

of society. This year we were granted four new patents, including

Fonterra’s rst ever patent in the area of food safety & quality.

The quality of Fonterra’s ‘Let’s Move’ health research was

recognised at the WCO IOF-ESCEO Congress in Paris in , with

the abstract winning one of ve awards from the IOF committee.

The study involved a nutrient-fortied milk drink and exercise

intervention, and the ndings saw improved mobility across a

range of measures in older women.

Helping support the health of millions of patients

Our Medical Nutrition team is tasked with pioneering a range

of dairy nutrition solutions for people who are recovering from

disease and illness at all stages of life, or who want to take

preventative actions to help them live longer and healthier lives.

During the last year, the team has been helping our customers

formulate products that support elderly people who are malnourished

or at risk of malnutrition. Focusing on malnutrition in healthcare

helps improve the quality of care, improve patient outcomes, reduce

re-admissions and decrease healthcare costs. The team is proud that

our ingredients are already being used in medical nutrition products

that help millions of patients around the world every year.

Improving the nutritional pro§le of our consumer products

We continue to improve the nutritional benets of our consumer

products by formulating to meet consumer nutrition and health

needs. See page  for examples of activities this year.

We also consider criteria such as minimum levels of dairy protein,

calcium, and key vitamins and minimising the addition of sugars,

rened carbohydrates and sweeteners. This year, we introduced

   applicable new or reformulated products, however not enough

of these were focused on improving the portion of our portfolio

that currently does not meet the guidelines. On a volume sold

basis



, the percentage of our applicable portfolio meeting our

endorsed guidelines went down from ¢£ to ¤¥£.

• We will continue to improve the nutritional value

of our consumer branded products and minimise added

sugars, salt and re’ned carbohydrates.

• We will continue to invest in research and development

and new innovations for our entire product range.

WHATʼS NEXT

Our targets

IndicatorTarget PerformanceCommentary

FY ’FY •FY ƒ

Percentage of everyday and advanced

nutrition products that meet endorsed

nutritional guidelines

˜

.

Fonterra consumer branded products (Global)

š”› by ƒ„ƒ„

…„„› by ƒ„ƒ”

–š…›’“›

Although new products have been launched,

the percentage by volumes of product sold

in FY¥



dropped slightly.

Innovation will be required to deliver some

of the remaining improvements.

Our performance

 Applicable products are those intended for everyday consumption in New Zealand and where the packaging is not also used for export to regions where the Health Star Rating is not accepted.

ˆ Assessment of existing products is based on protein and calcium criteria only because most of the portfolio predates the guidelines and information on other criteria is not available. All new

products are assessed against all guideline criteria. Everyday nutrition products are intended to deliver daily serves of dairy nutrition. Advanced nutrition products are daily dairy nutrition

with targeted nutritional fortication based on sound science.

 Due to the timing of data availability, our assessment of compliant volumes sold

in FY is reported in FY.

Good progress.

Some progress or slight delay. O— track.

FY performance:

Healthy People

HEALTHY PEOPLE

­…FONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT  ­†FONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 

BACK TO CONTENTS

Nutrition
and health CONTINUED

NZMP NutriWhite Dairy-Based Powder

In Africa and South-East Asia it’s di cult for low-income

families to buy aˆordable, quality food. Their diets are

often lacking in essential micronutrients. That’s why we

developed NZMP NutriWhite - an aˆordable, nutritionally-

forti’ed dairy-based powder – which is designed for

adding to tea and coˆee. It’s forti’ed with Iron, Zinc,

Calcium and vitamins A, C and D and also tastes good.

NZMP SureStart


MFGM Lipid ’—

Our latest innovative paediatric ingredient was launched at

Health Ingredients Europe in November •‚†ª. The bene’ts

of MFGM Lipid ̄‚ are backed by science which suggest

there is a role supporting infant brain development and

cognition, when used in infant formula products. Our ability

to manufacture this ingredient at multiple sites gives our

customers con’dence we can supply the quantities they need.

Contributing to health and wellbeing

Our products can help improve the health and wellbeing of people

around the world. Here’s a snapshot of how we helped this year.

NZMP Mozzarella Range

We have extended our range of Mozzarella cheeses to meet the

needs of diˆerent customers. These include a premium variety

right through to a cost-eˆective option and some options

that meet speci’c criteria – such as reduced salt. Salt is a vital

ingredient in cheese-making. It adds ±avour, helps with ripening

and works as a natural preservative. Reducing salt is not easy and

requires speci’c know how but doing so means our customers

can oˆer reduced salt options in their product ranges.

Soprole Protein¬

Our range of Protein¶ products oˆer higher levels of quality

dairy protein and are designed to help consumers spread their

protein intake across the day to support optimal muscle health.

In Chile, we have continued to expand our range of Soprole

Protein¶ products this year with four new varieties hitting

supermarket shelves. Soprole Protein¶ Plain yoghurt was voted

by consumers as the Product of the Year for innovation.

NZMP Lifestyle Probiotics

We launched two NZMP probiotics into the sports and active

lifestyle market this year. Originally discovered in New Zealand,

dairy cultures LactoB ‚‚† (HN™) and Bi’doB ‚†¤ (HN ™)

have been clinically researched and we have commercialised

these to help people improve their digestive health and immunity.

Our specialised processing techniques mean we can oˆer

customers a longer shelf-life in some applications.

Anmum Assura


with DR­—™

We extended our Anmum range with the launch of Assura™

in Hong Kong. Assura is a product for expectant and lactating

mothers and this new version contains the probiotic DR•‚™.

Probiotics are live bacteria and yeasts which are especially good

for your digestive system. DR•‚ is our patented probiotic strain

Lactobacillus rhamnosus (HN‚‚†™). It has been clinically proven

to help reduce the risk of children’s eczema by –‚® and has

given some indications that it can reduce the risk of gestational

diabetes by ˜ª®, and the risk of post-natal depression.

DR•‚ is just one of the many cultures that are currently growing

and multiplying at the Microbial Fermentation Unit (MFU), at our

Research & Development Centre in Palmerston North.

Anlene


range extended in Indonesia

In Indonesia this year, we extended our Anlene™

range with new formulations.

Anlene Acti’t includes the MoveMax nutrient bundle

specially designed to support bones, muscles and joints.

It includes dairy protein, Calcium, vitamin C, collagen,

vitamin B•, B˜, B†•, D and E, Magnesium and Zinc.

In addition to MoveMax, Anlene Gold Plus also

includes the BeatPlus nutrient bundle specially

designed to support heart health. It includes ’bre,

Potassium and vitamins B¤ and B†•, and contains

no added sugars or re’ned carbohydrates.

Healthy People

HEALTHY PEOPLE

­’FONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT  ­“FONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 

BACK TO CONTENTS

Our targets
IndicatorTarget PerformanceCommentary

FY ’FY •FY ƒ

Percentage of

manufacturing sites

certižed by an independent

third party to leading food

safety management system

(e.g. FSSCƒƒ„„„)

…„„› by the

end of ƒ„…†

“…›†„›†ƒ›

Divestment of our Venezeulan sites impacted

this number favourably. For the few remaining

sites our focus was on higher priority milk

quality items this year. It is expected that

full certication can be achieved by the end

of .

Total electronic traceability

from žnished product back

to milk supply

All Fonterra products

by the end of ƒ„ƒ„

’ƒ›†…›

…

†˜›

The underlying technology has been delivered

globally. However, the nal integration steps in

a few locations were placed on hold this year

for the portfolio review. The cost-benet of

further integration will be reviewed in FY.

• Complete the independent third-party certi’cation of our

manufacturing sites to a leading food safety management

system (e.g. FSSC••‚‚‚, BRC).

• Continue to in±uence and support the third-party

manufacturers who provide services to us by introducing

the use of our food safety culture auditing process

with key providers.

• To support our food crime response strategy, we will

introduce a new internal tool for our staˆ, allowing them

to report and assess suspicious items more e ciently

and thereby further protect our products, customers

and consumers.

WHATʼS NEXT

Our performance

Food safety

and quality

Safe food. Safe people.

World class quality. It’s our promise.

We make a promise to our customers and consumers to make

our food to standards of uncompromising food safety and

world-class quality. That’s why all our food products are assessed

for health and food safety impacts prior to initial launch and on

an ongoing basis.

Our approach

At Fonterra, food safety and quality is everyone’s responsibility

- from our farms all the way to our customers and consumers

around the world. Accountability for performance extends from

the Board of Directors, through the Fonterra Management Team,

to individual managers, workers, contractors working on Fonterra

sites and providers of goods and services. To ensure consistency

of approach and continuous improvement, the Group Food

Safety, Quality and Regulatory (FSQR) organisation and operating

model, including the Food Safety and Quality Council, has been

embedded across Fonterra.

Our Food Safety and Quality System ensures that, wherever

we are in the world, we have a clear, consistent framework to

deliver safe, quality products and services. Our Food Safety and

Quality System is made up of four key components: our Food

Safety Policy, business unit requirements, partner requirements,

and our food safety and quality behaviours. It is subject to regular

scrutiny from third-party audits by regulators, key account

customers and certication bodies.

What we’ve been doing

Trust in Source

Over the past ve years we have been embedding food safety

and quality as a cornerstone of our culture. In FY¥, we

introduced standardised induction programmes that apply to

both operational and non-operational employees. This means

we start the conversation about food safety with all sta­ from

the moment they join the organisation.

Building on the lessons we have learned from our own sites,

this year we have started to share our thinking with some of

our third-party manufacturers. We have used the ndings of our

audits to prioritise which third-party manufacturers we o­er

our support to rst. The support module includes help on risk

identication and mitigation for food safety.

This year we have also developed a food safety culture auditing

process and piloted its use at selected manufacturing sites around

the world. This allows us to assess the current state at a given site

and identify opportunities to strengthen their food safety culture.

Product traceability

After three and a half years of innovation, design and business

transformation, our Traceability Programme has been completed.

This signicant investment allows us to very e’ciently track

batches of product, the ingredients that went into them and

the primary packaging, from the raw milk we collect and process

right through to the consumer.

Over £ of all New Zealand milk is electronically traceable

back to daily farm collection, and ‡£ of our global supply chain.

We can track the origins of nearly any product within minutes,

and deliver traceability reports to teams around the Co-operative

within three hours.

Having established this underlying technology we are able to

provide innovative new services for our consumers, customers

and employees.

For example, for our consumers, we have continued to expand the

use of QR codes on our Anmum™ paediatric and maternal products.

These QR codes are unique to the specic item in the consumer’s

hand. Using their mobile phone consumers can check the item is

authentic and nd out additional information about its provenance,

both before they buy it and thereafter. This year we launched QR

code products in Vietnam, Indonesia, Singapore and Thailand.

For our customers, the technology o­ers the potential to

support authenticated claims on their products. This year we

entered a collaboration agreement with Nestlé to investigate

the use of blockchain technology, through the OpenSC platform,

to provide consumer access to independently veriable

sustainability and supply chain data.

Within the business, our employees around the world have access

to new traceability information and analysis reports which is

helping with responses to customer requests and decision-making.

No recalls

During the year, there were no consumer recalls of product

for safety reasons.

Milk

Manufacturing

Packaging and ingredients

DistributionConsumers

Total electronic product traceability

 FY was previously reported as … but a plant was omitted from the calculation.

Good progress.

Some progress or slight delay. O— track.

FY performance:

Healthy People

HEALTHY PEOPLE

­ƒFONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT  ­•FONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 

BACK TO CONTENTS

KickStart Breakfast
A nutritious breakfast and a nurturing environment can help

kids achieve their potential. The KickStart Breakfast programme,

is a collaborative initiative which we deliver in partnership with

the Ministry of Social Development and Sanitarium.

The clubs not only provide a healthy breakfast to kids who might

otherwise miss out, they also help students develop social skills,

take on extra responsibilities and connect with their peers,

teachers and volunteers from the wider community.

Fonterra and our farmers provide Anchor™ milk, Sanitarium

provides Weet-Bix™, and the Government supports the

programme through funding. The schools and their local

communities are responsible for providing bowls, cutlery, food

storage facilities and the volunteers to run the breakfast club.

This year, the initiative grew to over , clubs with more

than ‡, Kiwi kids participating.

Fonterra Milk for Schools

Fonterra’s Milk for Schools initiative is helping New Zealand

children get access to nutritious milk every school day.

The initiative is available to all New Zealand schools with

kids aged  - and o­ers a ml daily serving of Anchor™

lite (reduced fat) milk to every child, every day.

The initiative has been running for more than six years and

during FY it was active in almost ,¦ schools with around

¦, children taking part every school day. The programme

is funded by Fonterra and our farmers and it is delivered in

partnership with schools. This year Fonterra farmers provided

¥ million portions of milk to the children.

To celebrate back to school in , schools were invited

to nominate their local community hero. The winners were

Rangikura School in Porirua, Mossburn School in Southland

and Auckland’s Willowbank School, who all received a visit

from Fonterra Ambassador and former All Black captain,

Richie McCaw.

Trusted

Goodness


Non-GMO Project Standard

We see value in maintaining optionality around the use of

technology and the possibilities o­ered by new and emerging life

science technologies such as gene editing. Such advances could

potentially o­er signicant benets for sustainable nutrition,

animal welfare, human health, biosecurity and the environment.

We also listen carefully to our customers and consumers and

recognise the value in New Zealand’s global reputation for its

genetically modied organism (GMO) status, as supported

by the current New Zealand regulatory framework. To date,

no genetically modied plants or animals have been released

in New Zealand.

The Non-GMO Project is a mission-driven non-prot organisation

dedicated to building and protecting a non-GMO food supply

in North America. Its Non-GMO Project Standard is one of the

fastest growing voluntary labels in the United States retail sector.

To become veried, all inputs into an individual product must be

evaluated for compliance, including everything from the cows’

feed, to the activities at the specic site where the product

is manufactured.

We currently have ¦ products veried for Non GMO Project

manufacture for sale into the North American market. We also

have Non-GMO Project verication of our organic milk supply

and associated manufacturing sites.

Cared for Cows Standard

Last year, we launched our Cared for Cows Standard. While we

already have high standards of animal health and welfare, by

having independent certication against this standard we will

be able to reinforce the good work done by our farmers.

The programme involves some extra annual data collection

from farmers covering key indicators of animal health and

welfare performance and additional verication as part of

our on-farm assessment.

For more information see Animal health and biosecurity

on page .

Fonterra’s strategy is about creating more value for our farmers’

milk by connecting what our farmers do on farm to what our

customers value. Global trends indicate consumers want to

know more about where their food comes from, how it is made,

and what impact it has on the environment and communities.

Trusted Goodness™ is our promise to deliver quality milk using

our distinctive pastural-based approach to sustainable farming.

In FY¢, we launched the Trusted Goodness quality seal and

Trusted Goodness on-farm claims as a way to independently

demonstrate specic attributes of our products and the good

work of our farmers.

Independent certication is an important way to give our

customers and consumers condence. For each specic on-farm

claim, our farmers provide information each year. Our Trusted

Goodness on-farm claims are certied by AsureQuality, an

independent Conformity Assessment Body. AsureQuality is

accredited by JAS-ANZ to certify these on-farm claims against

the requirements of our Fonterra Trusted Goodness Scheme.

Trusted Goodness is on products in New Zealand, Australia,

Indonesia, Thailand, Malaysia, and the United States, covering

products such as Anchor™ fresh milk, whole milk powder, butter

and cheese, as well as Anmum™ paediatric formula and Anlene™

adult milk powders.

In addition, NZMP™ customers across North America,

South America, Europe, Taiwan and South East Asia are

leveraging our grass-fed icon and claims on their own brand

packaging and marketing activities. Consumer products that

carry NZMP grass-fed claims include sport nutrition high-protein

beverages and ready-to-mix powders, consumer milk powders

and UHT milk drinks.

Grass and Pasture-Fed Standard

New Zealand’s natural, grass-fed advantage and non-GMO status

are increasingly valued by our customers and consumers.

To support our grass-fed claim, we developed a Grass and Pasture-

Fed Standard that is third-party veried. This standard denes the

requirements for our grass-fed claim as:

• Grass Fed - a minimum of ¥£ grass, grass silage, hay and

forage crops (legumes and brassicas).




• Pasture RaisedžFed - cows have access to pasture at least

£ of their time.




These are amongst the highest rates in the world.

KickStart

Breakfast Clubs

On March †•th, World

Champion Shot Putter

Tom Walsh and Shirley

Primary School helped

us celebrate «‚ million

KickStart breakfasts served

since the programme

began in •‚‚¤.

In

-

school

nutrition

­— • KickStart Breakfast Award winners

• Club of the year - Terrace End School, Palmerston North.

• Student Champion of the Year – Tevita Nusi year 

student at Gisborne Boys High School.

• Unsung Hero (Volunteer) of the Year – Lynne Richards

and Kerry Farrant, Putaruru Primary School, Waikato.

 A grass-fed diet is dened as grass, grass silage, hay and forage crops calculated

on a dry matter basis.

 Excluding milking time (dened as the period that dairy cows are walked

to and from the milking shed and the time taken to perform milking).

Refreshed

pack design

This year we also

updated our pack

design to refresh the

educational facts for

the children to read

while they drink. These

appear in both English

and te reo Māori.

Healthy People

HEALTHY PEOPLE

€ FONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT  €—FONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 

BACK TO CONTENTS

Gender pay by location
Other significant locations

Diversity of our employeesWe have more male staff especially

in the waged category

Turnover (as œ of total workforce)

Pay ratio (Female:male)

Ž.‘‘

Ž.Œ’

‹.Ž“

Ž.Œ‹

Ž.Œ”

Ž.Œ•

‹.‹‹

Ž.‘“

SENIOR LEADERS

MANAGERS

PROFESSIONALS

WAGED

MEAN

GENDER DIVERSITY

…

MEDIAN

Our employee data is drawn from our global SAP-based employee data systems. The turnover data excludes the employees in our Brazilian joint venture operations. Numbers are generally

reported for all xed-term and permanent employees on a full-time equivalent (FTE) basis.Turnover and new hires is permanent employees and headcount basis. Gender pay gap is permanent

employees on headcount basis with pay compared on FTE basis. There are no signicant seasonal variations in the employee data reported. Casual sta— contracted by Fonterra are excluded from

these gures as this represents only a very small proportion of the regular workforce. Percentages shown may not sum to … due to rounding. Diverse or undeclared gender makes up less than .… of our workforce.

20

,

685

Global full-time equivalent employees for FY…†

Full timeFull time

Part timePart time

We employ over ­—,——— staff and most are full time

.

..

FY • ƒƒ,˜”“

.

Our people

Voluntary

ƒ.­œ

…–.†›

Turnover

Rate

Involuntary

†.†œ

Other*

 .€œ

Gap closedGap widened

GLOBAL

Globally on a mean

basis females get

paid more and the

gap is closing.

Globally on a median

basis females get

paid less and the gap

is widening.

Better than

the median for

New Zealand

businesses

which is „.†…”.

MEAN

MEDIAN

‹.ŽŒ

Ž.Œ•

NEW ZEALAND

……

,

š˜ƒ

EMPLOYEES

š„›ƒ†›

FY…†

MEAN

MEDIAN

Ž.Œ–

Ž.Œ•

Pay ratio (Female:male)

GENDER DIVERSITYGENDER PAY

MEAN

MEAN

MEAN

MEAN

MEDIAN

MEDIAN

MEDIAN

MEDIAN

‹.’‘

Ž.Œ”

‹.“–

‹.“•

—.‹‘

Ž.Œ•

‹.“Ž

‹.‹—

AUSTRALIA

GREATER CHINA

CHILE

BRAZIL

FemaleMale

’…œ

•…œ

•†œ

““œ

­…œ

€†œ

 “œ

 …œ

Gender pay gap is closing on an employee category basis

We use a ratio of female:male. We analyse both mean and median to increase our understanding.

 .—— is ideal.

̄€—€—-…—°…—Unknown

Fonterra Board—œƒœƒ œ—œ

Management Team (FMT)—œ†€œ…’œ—œ

Across all employees †œ…’œ­…œ†œ

Senior Leaders œ“—œ€…œ†œ

Managers…œ’—œ­­œ€œ

Professionals­—œ“—œ •œ­œ

Waged …œ…—œ€­œ€œ

AGEGENDER

…

FemaleMale

 •œ•­œ

’ œ

’€œ

’—œ

“­œ

… œ

•†œ

­ƒœ

­’œ

­ƒœ

€•œ

†ƒœ

 “œ

Healthy People

HEALTHY PEOPLE

€€FONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT  €­FONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 

BACK TO CONTENTS

Health,
safety and

wellbeing

We want all Fonterra people to be healthy,

to live a balanced life and to go home from

work safely every day.

Our approach

Fonterra operates a global health and safety management system.

The Fonterra Group Health, Safety and Wellbeing Policy sets out

our requirements for responsible operation and employee safety.

Implementation of and compliance with the policy is overseen by

our global Director of Food Safety, Health and Regulatory.

We are committed to delivering on our health, safety and

wellbeing commitments through:

• People who believe that harm is avoidable and who support

a safe and healthy work environment

• Processes that always prioritise safe work practices and

proactively identify and manage exposure to risk

• Plant and equipment that considers design, operation,

management and maintenance to always prioritise a safe

and healthy work environment.

Accountability for performance extends from the Board of

Directors, through the Fonterra Management Team, to individual

managers, workers and contractors working on Fonterra sites.

What weʼve been doing

Safe home audits

By focusing on areas of vulnerability and identifying

improvements to help keep our people safe, we continue

to improve our health and safety performance. In addition

to self-assessments performed locally, each year we run a

global programme of comprehensive Safe Home Assurance

Audits. These audits are undertaken by our Internal Audit

team, independently of the business unit, and involve a

detailed on-site assessment. This year we increased our

coverage and completed audits at ‡  of our sites. For 

of these, controls were found to be not as e­ective as we

would like and improvement actions have been identied

to address this.

Employee wellbeing

We established a Global Wellbeing Forum this year with a specic

emphasis on mental health. The forum is intended to encourage

local ownership of employee wellbeing in an aligned way, sharing

best practice to accelerate progress.

To support this, we organised a week long ‘Better You’ global team

challenge. Based on the internationally recognised ‘Five Ways to

Wellbeing’: Give, Be Active, Take Notice, Connect and Keep Learning;

teams worked together on a range of up to  short-duration

activities during the week. Across  countries, ,¦ employees

took part with participants surveyed at the end. Feedback was very

positive and ¢£ of respondents felt that the challenge helped

boost their mental health and physical wellbeing.

Around the world, local business units also organised a range of

local wellbeing activities including the use of Good Yarns to talk

about mental health, –u vaccinations and the importance of sleep.

On-farm health and safety

In New Zealand, there are signicant numbers of fatalities

associated with working in the agricultural industry. In the ¢

calendar year there were four reported fatalities working on dairy

farms and six in ¥



. We are active members of the Agricultural

Leaders Health and Safety Action Group and, working with other

organisations, we are seeking ways to help reduce the risk of injury.

This year, some of our on-farm assessments included an extra

survey to help with industry research. The research project, led

by DairyNZ and supported by WorkSafe New Zealand, has been

established to help identify the most common causes of milking

related injuries so that potential solutions can be co-developed.

Government data for the period of Jan-¦ to Aug-¤ shows

there were a total of , milking related injuries. The research

is intended to reduce the frequency, severity andžor the time lost.

On our own Nutrient Management farms in New Zealand, we have

implemented the improvement actions arising from our Safe Home

Assurance Audits in FY¥ and these will be reassessed during FY.

• We continue to seek further improvements in our

performance by focusing on the completion of the actions

arising from investigations into actual or potential high

severity incidents to ensure we eliminate the root causes.

• As part of our focus on staˆ wellbeing, we will empower

our people to talk about mental health by running

“Good Yarn” training workshops.

WHATʼS NEXT

Our targets

IndicatorTarget PerformanceCommentary

FY ’FY •FY ƒ

Work-related fatalities

(attributable to Fonterra –

sta«, contractors,

on-site public)

Zero harm

„„…

Tragically a member of sta­ lost their life

on one of our China farms.

Total recordable injury

frequency rate (TRIFR per

million work hours)

World class for

our industry

group (®”)

”.ƒ’.…–.†

Representing a ¢‡£ reduction from FY this year

we achieved our target.  employees still required

medical treatment, restricted work duties or time

away from work so we will continue to seek further

improvements in both rate and severity.

Number of serious

harm injuries

ƒ

Zero harm

…š…–…“

Having achieved our lowest recorded level in FY¥,

this year saw an increase. This is an area where we

will continue to focus in FY.

Percentage of sta«

participation in at least

one health and wellness

programme per year

Measure and

report only

…“›–…˜›

This year, we re-established a global wellbeing

challenge. We also ran a number of local activities

across the year. In some cases, we were unable to

accurately track participation therefore we have

taken a conservative approach for reporting.

Total recordable injury frequency rate

Our team in Sri Lanka won the top award for Food and Beverage

companies at the National Occupational Safety and Health

Excellence (NOSHE) awards. The team has a focus on continuous

improvement, not only within the workplace but also sharing its

practices with the wider community, including supplying farmers.

Our Susumas site participated for the rst time in the Malaysian

Society for Occupational Safety & Health (MSOSH) Awards.

A stringent audit of the site was undertaken by MSOSH certied

auditors and the team was recognised with a Gold Class I Award

for the manufacturing and chemical sectors.

Two of our sites in New Zealand, designated as Lower Tier Major

Hazard Facilities, received regulatory notices from WorkSafe

New Zealand for improvements. These primarily relate to process

safety and Fonterra has an agreed action plan underway to close

out the matters raised.

Our performance

 Source: Worksafe New Zealand, workplace fatalities by industry.

 Serious harm injuries are injuries that cause temporary or permanent loss of

body function and include those toinvolving both employees and contractors.









TRIFR (per million work hours)



FYFYFYFYFYFYFYFYFYFY

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Good progress.

Some progress or slight delay. O— track.

FY performance:

Healthy People

HEALTHY PEOPLE

€…FONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT  €†FONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 

BACK TO CONTENTS

People are at the heart of our success
so it is vital that we respect their

employment rights and provide them

with a work environment that allows

them to perform at their best and develop.

We’re focused on building a diverse and inclusive workforce that is

highly-engaged and e­ective, while also investing in employees to

help them respond to the ever-evolving nature of work.

Most of our ,μ employees work in processing and

distribution. They are supported by employees in corporate roles

such as sales, marketing, nance and human resources. This

section covers all people who we employ directly and work in sites

or o’ces that are owned or controlled by Fonterra.

Our approach

We have a customer-driven people strategy to ensure we have

the right talent, leadership and engagement.

Our Code of Business Conduct and global policies, including

ethical behaviour, diversity and inclusion, set clear expectations

for how our people need to act and behave. These policies are

supported by local guidance to re–ect relevant regulations and

norms. An understanding of and connection with local markets

is vital to our success. By hiring and developing local talent, we

contribute towards the shared success of our Co-operative and

the countries where we operate.

We fund an independently administered whistle-blowing hotline

(The Way We Work Hotline), facilitated by Deloitte, available

to all employees globally to raise concerns related to serious

wrongdoing or other behaviour they wish to report. We also

provide an Employee Support Programme (EAP) where employees

can seek advice and counselling



.

Fonterra has a long-standing agreement with the International

Union of Food (IUF) and the New Zealand Dairy Workers

Union which recognises our commitment to the Conventions

of the International Labour Organisation (ILO) for all Fonterra

employees. In New Zealand, ¤£ of all full-time equivalent

Fonterra employees are covered by collective bargaining

agreements and we have union agreements and relationships

in many other markets.

What we've been doing

Learning and development

We expect that every employee will embrace the need for lifelong

learning to sustain the relevant capabilities for their role, and we

expect every leader to support on-going workplace development.

Recognising the changing future of work, we’ve been working

with the New Zealand Government and other Kiwi businesses on

an approach to upskill the New Zealand workforce. The Aotearoa

New Zealand Skills Pledge, announced by Prime Minister Jacinda

Ardern, is a commitment by the Government and businesses to

double the number of on-the-job training and reskilling hours we

provide by  . We’ll publicly disclose our investment in on-the-

job training and reskilling hours starting in FY.

Launched in FY¥, ‘amp’ helps employees develop their careers by

spending up to ‡£ of their time on projects outside their normal

day jobs. Powered by a web-based application, where people build

their proles and internal projects specify their needs, ‘amp’ allows

projects to quickly tap into existing talent and employees to nd

development opportunities. This year ‘amp’ won the innovation

and technology award at the New Zealand Human Resources

Awards, the Digital Trailblazer award at the SAP Innovation

Awards, and has connected ‡ people to  projects.

THRIVE is an experiential learning programme which helps sta­

gain a better understanding of Fonterra’s end-to-end supply chain

with the help of gamication, and earned the Talent Acquisitionž

Development & Management Award at this year’s New Zealand

Human Resources Awards. Over , people have utilised the

programme to expand their knowledge and understand how their

role ts into our value chain.

We o­er our employees access to qualications through

development programmes such as DAIRYCRAFT. In partnership

with the Primary Industry Training Organisation, DAIRYCRAFT

currently helps operators in our New Zealand manufacturing sites

and distribution centres to develop relevant technical skills and gain

a national qualication. To date, ¢ employees have completed

the ¥-month programme and a further ¦¤¢ are currently enrolled.

Among the employees who have completed DAIRYCRAFT, this year

we identied    who have subsequently transitioned into higher

level roles. We’ve also expanded the programme and o­ered more

streams, including Lactose, Whey and Casein, with coverage across

all ingredients sites in New Zealand.

In regional New Zealand, we have ‡  sta­ undertaking mechanical,

electrical and heavy automotive apprenticeships – including four

women in what have traditionally been considered male trades.

CASE STUDY

Women in leadership

We believe a diverse and inclusive workforce will help us

to deliver our purpose and enable innovation to ±ourish.

Women in leadership is an area we identi’ed for action

and we started in the business unit responsible for

most of our manufacturing activities and most of our

New Zealand-based workforce.

With the speci’c objective of increasing the number of

female leaders and achieving our target of gender parity

in senior leadership positions, we've been working to

understand and remove barriers to gender balance and

possible hurdles to women progressing into leadership

roles within our operations environments.

We started our ’rst Women’s Coaching Circle in •‚†ª

as a forum for women to learn more about how they can

develop their careers in operations, and raise any issues

they need help with, in a safe and con’dential setting.

This forum is open to all women, both inside our main

manufacturing business unit and beyond, and there's

currently a membership of over † ̄‚ women. Meetings

are facilitated monthly, discussing themes such as how

to have better conversations, unconscious bias, mentoring

and resilience.

While appointments are always based on merit, our aim

is to encourage women to see leadership in operations

as a potential career path – and to apply for opportunities.

We've implemented a ±exible working process to allow

some people to work from diˆerent locations or at

diˆerent times and support better work ̈life balance.

We’ve also put a real focus on diversity in our graduate

recruitment programmes.

In the last two years, we've appointed women to key

operations leadership roles - two Regional Operations

Managers and three Site Operations Manager roles.

We’ll continue the Women’s Coaching Circles, and hope

to extend this so that selected female leaders each sponsor

a circle. We’re also looking to shift the circles from purely

women in leadership, to improving workplace inclusion

more widely.

“The organisation has allowed space and time

for women at all levels to talk openly about issues

important to them and the exibility and trust we

now have is very empowering. We have some really

inspiring women Site Operations Managers and the

success and support they get is allowing others to

see this as a real career path”

Employment

rights

 For more information on our hotline and EAP service please refer to

www.fonterra.comGovernanceEthicalBusinessNotes

Healthy People

€’FONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 

HEALTHY PEOPLE

€“FONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 

BACK TO CONTENTS

Diversity and Inclusion
We believe a diverse and inclusive workforce will enable us to

deliver to our purpose, empowering people to create goodness

for generations – You, Me, Us, Together – Tātou, Tātou. Embedding

diversity and inclusion in how we think, act and operate will also

help innovation –ourish.

Our understanding of the diversity of our people is growing

but the ethnicity of £ of our employees remains unknown.

This is likely to remain a challenge due to the high proportion

of operational workforce with limited access to systems and the

need to respect privacy rights. Collection of some information

must remain voluntary to respect privacy rights.

This year, our major business units have established specic

diversity and inclusion plans, including their women in leadership

aspirations. To support this we have rolled out our ‘Women@Work’

programme – which includes connecting our women quartlerly

on a global level, the development of an Unconscious Bias training

module and improving the way we support parental leave.

We have continued to progress our Rautaki Māori (Māori

strategy), building our Te Ao Māori capability and forging stronger

relationships with groups representing the interests of the

indigenous Māori people of New Zealand. Our Te Mātāpuna

app, which makes Māori culture and language more accessible

to employees, was part of a suite of initiatives that culminated

in Fonterra winning the award for the Business and Corporate

category at the National Māori Language week. We continue

to host Māori language learning through Te Wānanga o Aotearoa

for our second cohort of employees and sta­ from other businesses.

For our manufacturing sta­ we arranged Noho Marae sessions

(time spent on a Marae) to more deeply understand the culture

particularly the importance of positive relationships with tangata

whenua (local host tribe). We’re also integrating aspects of

Te Ao Māori into our daily business including increased use

of Whakatu (welcome ceremonies).

We are also working together with other organisations to

help progress diversity and inclusion in our own organisation

and more widely. For example, Global Women, Champions

for Change, TupuToa and First Foundation in New Zealand,

Workplace Gender Equity in Australia and the local government

in Saudi Arabia.

Closing our gender pay gap

Our approach is that there should be no unexplainable gender

pay gap for any employees, considering factors such as tenure,

qualication levels or experience. For waged employees, this

principle is embedded in our collective employment agreements.

For salaried employees, Fonterra regularly monitors gender pay

and uses a range of independent and external third-party pay

market data to benchmark our competitive pay position and to

ensure internal consistency. This year we are reporting both mean

and median calculations (see page )



.

Our overall gender pay ratio is . using mean and .  using

median. On a mean basis, it improved from . and on a median

basis it widened from .¢. This demonstrates the value of

considering both calculations. In both cases and as in past years,

overseas countries where the highest proportion of men work in

lower paid roles such as operators, technicians, and farm workers,

and the highest proportion of women are in more senior roles do

in–uence the results.

In New Zealand, the female to male base salary is .¢, meaning

the gap has increased since last year (.¥) but is still better than

in FY¢ (.¤). On a median basis FY is .  which compares

well with the national median of . . Our analysis of changes

this year has highlighted the sensitivity of this single metric to

organisational change (e.g. divestment of a business). We are

therefore increasing our attention on the pay ratios within the

di­erent employment categories (i.e. senior leaders, managers,

professionals and waged). On a mean basis, globally our gap

in each category closed slightly this year. Australia remains the

location where we have the most signicant negative gender pay

ratio. Unfortunately, this has remained static at . on a mean

basis and the improvement from .¦  to . ¦ on a median

basis does not show after rounding.

Employee engagement

Employment engagement is integral to our performance. We can

only deliver high quality products and services with motivated

people who are proud to work for Fonterra.

We measure employee engagement in our annual MySay survey,

independently administered by Gallup. The survey, completed

in late Augustžearly September  was completed by ¥¤£ of

employees and showed an increase from ¦. to ¦.¢ (out of  ).

Employment

rights CONTINUED

• Over the coming year, we’ll work with leadership groups

in each country to increase the proportion of women and

ethnic minorities within senior leadership levels, in line

with our diversity targets.

• We’re also working to get the Rainbow Tick, awarded to

New Zealand workplaces that are inclusive and welcoming

for people of diverse sexuality and gender identity.

• We’re prioritising learning for leadership across front-line,

mid-level and executive leaders. We’ll commence the rollout

of our updated Front Line Leaders programme during FY•‚.

• To encourage regional youth into a dairy processing career

we are developing a managed apprenticeship programme.

This new Dairy Processing Apprenticeship will be piloted

in FY•‚ with ˜ apprentices, who will complete a L€ Dairy

Processing quali’cation over a two-year period.

• DAIRYCRAFT will expand it’s learning streams to cover

new streams including ethanol, UHT, powder blending

and consumer cheese.

WHATʼS NEXT

Our performance

This year, Fonterra was accredited with the Gender Tick, which

is awarded to New Zealand employers committed to gender

equality and we were ranked ¥

nd

in the Equileap Gender Equality

Global Ranking. Equileap ranked over ‡,  publicly listed

companies against  gender equality criteria. We’re one of four

NZ companies in the Top  globally. We rate well, but we know

there is still more to be done to ensure that gender equality is

imbedded in our organisation. We were also a nalist in the Equal

Pay Awards for New Zealand.

We also changed the way we recruit our graduate talent to

ensure we are attracting and selecting balanced diversity and

achieved our aspiration of  ž  gender representation for

graduates this year.

 In December , Statistics New Zealand published measurement and analysis guidelines for

gender pay gaps. By publishing both mean and median we will allow comparison with others.

For our own progress, we will continue to use both help us manage improvements over time.

Our targets

IndicatorTarget PerformanceCommentary

FY ’FY •FY ƒ

Employee engagementWorld-class

(Top quartile)

˜.“”

(nd lowest

quartile)

–.„„

(nd highest

quartile)

–.„š

(nd highest

quartile)

The engagement survey for FY was completed

in early FY with ¥¤£ of employees participating.

A score of ¦. is considered top quartile in FY.

Female representation in

senior leadership

”„› by ƒ„ƒƒ

˜„›˜„›ƒ†›

We have made good progress in establishing

direction and developing a talent feeder pipeline.

The opportunity to progress into senior leadership

roles has been limited and divestment of businesses

has impacted this indicator unfavorably.

Ethnic representation in

senior leadership

ƒ„› by ƒ„ƒƒ

–†›†›

Privacy concerns and the voluntary nature of

reporting ethnicity information has limited our

understanding and ability to improve. We continue

to encourage our people to self-report which will

in turn help us to make progress.

Good progress.

Some progress or slight delay. O— track.

FY performance:

Healthy People

HEALTHY PEOPLE

€ƒFONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT  €•FONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 

BACK TO CONTENTS

FAMILY VIOLENCE INVESTIGATIONS
– ONE EVERY 4 MINUTES

IN 2018 POLICE RECORDED:

4

MIN

133 022

UP FROM 118 910 IN 2016

Human

rights

As a large-scale employer, working in

many countries around the world, it is

our responsibility to care for the rights of

people directly and indirectly impacted by

our operations and decisions.

Our approach

Since adopting ISO¤ in ¦ we have been improving

our visibility of and accountability for human rights issues.

Our approach has its foundations in our values and is built on

the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights.

Respect for human rights is embedded in “Our People” Group

Policy, and expectations are articulated throughout our people

standards, and our code of conduct, “The Way We Work”.

Two members of our FMT, the MD Co-operative A­airs and

MD People and Culture, are responsible for the governance of

human rights within our business and our sphere of in–uence.

Human rights due diligence is undertaken across our value chain.

What weʼve been doing

Human rights due diligence

Human Rights ‘due diligence’ is a process to identify and prioritise

actual and potential human rights issues in an organisation’s

direct and indirect sphere of in–uence. In ¢, our workforce

evaluation across New Zealand, Australia, Brazil and Chile, covering

approximately three-quarters of our employees, identied some

concerns about bullying and harassment, long working hours and

the potential for human rights risks in our non-milk supply chain.

This year we have been responding to these concerns within our

workforce (see Addressing bullying below), and in our supply chain.

Within our non-milk supply chain, our process identied a

higher human rights risk associated with some of our non-milk

ingredients. This year, we specically included an assessment of

human rights as part of the quarterly vendor review meetings

with nine key ingredients vendors and increased coverage of

human rights in sta­ training and vendor assessment (See our

Responsible procurement section on page ).

We had intended to extend our due diligence process to our

workforce in other regions but we postponed this due to the

strategic review process. We did commence a more detailed

review of human rights risks on farm.

Addressing bullying

New Zealand has high rates of bullying, and this spills over into

workplaces, a­ecting around one in ve working people. It’s not

just an issue in New Zealand, it impacts workplaces globally and

can seriously impact mental health and wellbeing.

At Fonterra, we believe that everyone has the right to work in

a safe and inclusive environment free from any form of bullying

or harassment. We do not tolerate these harmful behaviours in

our workplace and are taking steps to empower our people

to speak up, stand together and stop them from occurring.

We have committed to a number of initiatives designed to

create a ‘culture of care’.

In FY¥, we developed new online and face-to-face bullying and

harassment training for employees, called “Culture for Care”, and

piloted at our Te Rapa site. This year we extended the pilot to ve

other sites, and then commenced the rollout of e-learning and

face-to-face training to key NZ business units. To date, over

,¤ employees have received the training.

Our performance

We have been selected as a nalist for the Sustainable Business

Network Awards in the Partnering for Good category. This is in

recognition of the collaborative work with other organisations to

develop a family violence support toolkit. The toolkit provides a

starting point for other businesses and has had over  ,  unique

visits since it was publicly launched.

www.businessworkingtoendfamilyviolence.nz

WHATʼS NEXT

• We will extend our due diligence process and continue

with our assessment and response to any issues

identi’ed in our on-farm and non-milk supply chains.

• We will train more staˆ as family violence ’rst

responders – those people that our staˆ and managers

can go to have a ’rst conversation about a family

violence situation.

• We will prepare for the publication of our ’rst

modern slavery report by January •‚•† to satisfy the

requirements of the Australian Modern Slavery Act.

CASE STUDY

Addressing family violence in

New Zealand and Australia

“I would probably still be in a violent

relationship”

In FY†ª, we launched a new initiative for New Zealand

and Australian employees impacted by family violence.

We wanted to ensure we have a caring and sensitive

environment where people can talk about family violence

and know how to get con’dential support if they need it.

In New Zealand, we joined Shine and Women’s Refuge

to launch a programme to raise awareness about family

violence and provide support services for employees who

may need help. Within the Co-op more than –‚ staˆ have

been trained as family violence ’rst responders. This means,

those staˆ in need, who will always remain anonymous,

have someone to go to for a ’rst conversation as they seek

the necessary support.

It's not easy to confront the fact that your relationship

might be abusive.

For those who need it, the programme has been hugely

successful. The following is anonymous feedback from

one employee.

“From the rst time talking about family violence

and my situation with the rst responder, it was

frightening. They reassured me that everything

would be condential. They assisted me through

the rough times.”

“If it wasn’t for the help Fonterra o­ered within

work time, I would probably still be in a violent

relationship. It’s not easy by any means as I was in

a violent relationship for €‚ years so breaking that

cycle of habit was very challenging to say the least.

I was in a very dark place and the rst responder

was there for me every step of the way for doctor

visits and counselling etc.”

“I would like to thank Fonterra, especially my rst

responder, for all that they have done and continue

to do for me. It’s a long journey that is not xed

overnight so the responder’s patience has been

a virtue for me and my children.”

New Zealand statistics. Source: nzfvc.org.nz

Healthy People

† FONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 

HEALTHY PEOPLE

†—FONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 

BACK TO CONTENTS

Responsible
procurement

Our business has considerable scale

and with that comes the opportunity to

influence for good.

In terms of procurement, this means working to source goods

and services produced in an environmentally and socially

responsible way that positively in–uences behaviours in

our supply chain.

By far the largest single input to our business is raw milk,

collected directly from farmers. For more information on how we

work with our farmers, in New Zealand and around the world,

see page .

This section covers our non-milk supply chain, including

capital projects.

Our approach

Our Group Procurement Policy and Procurement Standard set

out our requirements for the procurement of non-milk goods

and services, including capital projects. This includes key principles

such as assuring the health, safety and wellbeing of people, food

safety and quality, environmental sustainability and social practices.

The requirements apply for all purchasing, but for signicant items

our specialist procurement team must be involved in the purchasing

decisions and ongoing management of the vendors.

The Group Policy is approved by the Board of Directors and the

CFO is accountable for ensuring the Group Standard is fully

implemented across the organisation. All sta­ are responsible for

complying with the standard.

The Fonterra Supplier Sustainability Code of Practice sets our

expectations of vendors including upholding standards related to

human rights, fair working conditions and environmental protection.

www.fonterra.com‰sustainabilitycop

We select vendors based on a balanced set of criteria and some

vendors we select may have aspects of social or environmental

performance that requires improvement. We believe we make

a positive contribution to society by working with and in–uencing

vendors who show a willingness to improve. As part of our

regular assessment of vendors, we specically consider social

and environmental risks.

In calendar year ¥, we used ¤,¦‡ tonnes of palm-related

products as an ingredient and, via Farm Source™ stores, we

retailed  , tonnes of Palm Kernel Expeller (PKE), a by-product

of palm oil production, used as a supplementary feed for cows.

Approximately ‡£ of PKE imports into New Zealand are procured

and distributed by Agrifeeds, a joint venture between Fonterra

and Wilmar.

We have been a member of the Roundtable for Sustainable Palm

Oil (RSPO) since  and since  , all our palm oil purchases

have been certied by RSPO. In ¤, we launched our Palm

Product Standard. This requires palm product vendors within

our supply chain to publicly commit to “No Deforestation, No

Peatland Development, and No Exploitation” and have processes

to meet these commitments. We had planned to update this

standard this year but that has been delayed into FY.

What we’ve been doing

Sta© Training and Development

Buyers within our procurement teams play a critical role in

assessing and managing the sustainability performance of

our vendors. This year we ran company-specic training on

sustainability, including social and environmental issues

faced in our supply chain, for our Group Procurement team.

This specically included training on human rights risks to

assist with our preparation to report on Modern Slavery.

Vendor assessments

Assessing and managing the risk of environmental and social

issues within our supply chain is a core part of responsible

procurement. This year, we assessed our top ¦ non-milk

suppliers globally (accounting for ¢ £ of spend) and we extended

the coverage of this assessment to also cover our Farm Source™

retail business. For Farm Source retail, over  vendors were

assessed for human rights and environmental risk, specically

investigating country of origin of goods and including the top

¦  vendors by spend.

We also conducted on-site environmental audits for  vendor

sites. Based on the audit score, the vendor is allocated a risk

rating and a re-audit date. The one vendor site that was identied

as high risk has agreed corrective actions and will be revisited

within  months.

Social procurement

In New Zealand, we joined other leading organisations as founding

members of the country’s rst social procurement buyer group.

Established by the Ākina Foundation, the Fwd: platform connects

procurement teams with social enterprises that have a positive

impact on society as they deliver various goods and services. It

gives us another way to do good through our business activities.

Forest products

Palm products are one of the highest-prole raw materials in our

supply chain. The production of palm products is often linked

to unsustainable practices, including deforestation, habitat

destruction and poor human rights practices. We therefore have

a specic focus on this area but we also consider the risk of

deforestation in our supply chain more widely and we completed

our second response to CDP on Forests this year.

As reported last year, while our supplier Wilmar continues to

conservatively track and report on traceability of PKE to plantation

(£ approximately), traceability to mill is their main focus. Knowing

the source mill is a good indicator of the approximate location of

its suppliers and they have almost reached £ for the specic

countries where we source.

Wilmar, our largest supplier, and Agrifeeds both make detailed

traceability information available on their websites:

www.wilmar-international.com‰sustainability‰progress‰traceability

www.agrifeeds.co.nz‰sustainability

WHATʼS NEXT

• We will continue to expand our engagement with

speci’c vendors in high risk areas to ensure they better

understand our expectations, and we better understand

the practices in their supply chains.

• We will update our Sustainability Code of Practice and

our Palm Products Standard.

• We will continue to work with suppliers of direct and

indirect palm oil ingredients to work towards †‚‚®

certi’ed segregated supply.

Our targets

IndicatorTarget PerformanceCommentary

FY ’

(CY­— “)

FY •

(CY­— ’)

FY ƒ

(CY­— •)

Sourcing ‘segregated

supply’ palm oil from

credible organisations.

…„„› by end

of CYƒ„…“

ƒ.š›š›ƒ˜›

We made good progress during CY¥ and

FY. We missed our original target date but at

the end of FY, by volume,  .¤£ of all palm oil

being purchased from New Zealand and Australia

is certied as segregated supply and over ¢£

on a global basis. Achieving the remaining small

percentage will be challenging but we hope to

achieve this by end CY.

PKE traceable

to mill

…„„› by end

of CYƒ„…“

†’.š›†˜.†›†“.š›

Traceability to mill has continued to improve.

AgriFeeds source all PKE via Wilmar from Indonesia

and Malaysia where it has achieved ¥. £ and .¦£

traceability to mill, respectively.

Our performance

Good progress.

Some progress or slight delay. O— track.

FY performance:

Healthy People

HEALTHY PEOPLE

†€FONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT  †­FONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 

BACK TO CONTENTS

Indonesia
In FY¥, working in partnership with the local Mersi Dairy

Co-operative and supported by local government, we launched

the Fonterra Dairy Cluster Partnership in West Sumatra. We have

been training about ¢ farmers and monitoring their progress.

During FY the focus has been on practices to improve milk

quality and we have seen signicant improvements, from ¤-¥

million CFUžml in June ¥ to an average close to  CFUžml

in September .

Training and monitoring during the year has progressed from milk

quality to also consider environmental and animal welfare aspects

too. Environmental improvements have focused on e¹uent

management and its usage. Animal welfare improvements have

focused on suitable bedding and access to adequate water.

Production has now grown to an average of over , litres of

milk per day and, in addition to local sales, about ¤ litres of milk

is sold from the farms direct to businesses in nearby cities. To help

establish markets for the product, education has been provided on

the use of milk as a nutritional ingredient for local cuisine.

During the year, local schools, kindergarten and university students

have visited farms to increase their understanding of dairy farming

and some of the schools have started their own milk in school

programs. One Junior High School has started a nutritional

breakfast initiative which uses pasteurised milk from a farmer

who completed the Fonterra Dairy Scholarship Program in ¦.

Chile

In FY¢, working with our Chilean subsidiary Prolesur, we

established an exchange scheme to give young Chilean farmers

the opportunity to learn from leading farmers in New Zealand.

During FY, ¦ young farmers completed their full year in

New Zealand and our third group of  young farmers have

now arrived in New Zealand.

Through paid, hands-on work experience with our New Zealand

farmers, the young farmers learn pastoral dairy farming skills.

The young farmers come from Southern Chile, where pastoral

dairy farming is also the main farming system, so when they

return home, they can contribute to the dairy development

potential there.

Sri Lanka

We supported the ‘Gift A Smile’ project which is building three

rural school libraries in our Bingiriya dairy community. Local

Fonterra staˆ donated around •‚‚ valuable books and the

Grass Roots fund provided school exercise books. This project

bene’ted over –‚‚ under-privileged kids attending the schools.

We also participated in a national tree planting campaign

organised the Sri Lankan Army. Local Fonterra staˆ donated

†,–‚‚ plants and the Grass Roots fund provided two solar

powered water pumps.

Australia

As part of the Boomerang movement, a group of volunteers meet

in the Yinnar and District Community Hall to recycle fabric into

reusable fabric bags. The bags are donated to local businesses to

give to their customers as an alternative to single-use plastic bags.

Funding from the Grass Roots Fund allowed the group to

buy enough fabric to make over †‚‚ bags.

Sixty children attending Wydinia Kindergarten and Early Learning

Centre in western Victoria enjoyed the Henny Penny Hatching

program thanks to funding from the Grass Roots Fund. The program

teaches children about caring for animals and the circle of life, by

watching the hatching process, looking after the chicks, through

to them becoming laying hens.

Dairy development

Through our dairy development activities, we support local

dairy farmers in key markets to help build thriving communities.

By working together with local stakeholders and sharing our

expertise and the lessons we continue to learn, we contribute

to wider sustainable development.

Sri Lanka

In Sri Lanka, to help develop the capability of local dairy farmers,

we established our demonstration and training farm at Pannala.

This year we have been transitioning this farm to a new operating

model through a partnership approach and therefore less farmer

training has occurred there. In milk sourcing and supplier relations,

our supplier relationship o’cers have continued to engage with

farmers to improve milk quality and animal welfare, and increase

adoption of best practices to ensure a sustainable supply of milk.

China

Encouraging the development of young Chinese talent in

agriculture is an important aspect of our dairy development work.

More than £ of employees on our China Farms are locally

recruited and trained. We have also provided nancial support

to a further  agriculture and food science students from

 Chinese universities. This takes our total to over , since

the Fonterra Scholarship programme launched in . This year

the Scholarship programme received a “CSR China Top  Award”

from the volunteer platform “Share the Care” with the guidance of

the Central School Department of China Communist Youth League.

We have also been working with local authorities and research

teams in China and New Zealand to build a circular economy

solution. Treated wastewater, manure and biogas residue from

our China Farms is used as a restorative fertiliser to improve

soil health on arable land, including an organic fruit company.

In January , we were awarded “¥ annual sustainable

company” by Pengpai, a well-known media organisation in

China in recognition of the work.

Supporting our

communities

Community investment

We invest in our local communities in a wide range of ways,

including in-school nutrition, foodbanks, dairy development

and supporting community events. In addition, the Fonterra

Grass Roots Fund ’nancially supports initiatives that help to

strengthen our communities, bringing them together, caring

for the environment and promoting safe and healthy lifestyles.

Launched in •‚‚ ̄, it is now active in New Zealand, Australia

and Sri Lanka, with decision-making distributed regionally.

distributed to

­—… initiatives

 

$770k distributed to “ƒ“ initiatives

$750k distributed to “ƒ“ initiatives

FY…“

FY…š

$382k

FY…†

As part of our exchange scheme with Prolesur, young farmers

from Chile learn practical skills on farm in New Zealand.

We also provide dairy

nutrition through our

In-school programmes

- see page 

­­.“m

portions

­

$7.4m

 Most of reduction for FY was due to New Zealand only holding one funding round as we

review our approach.

 A portion is ml of milk for Fonterra Milk for Schools and an estimated £ml of milk

for KickStart Breakfast.

In Australia, as well as donating meals and milk to Foodbank,

some of our sta† also volunteered their time (see page )

Healthy People

†…FONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 

HEALTHY PEOPLE

††FONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 

BACK TO CONTENTS

We are working together to
achieve a healthy environment

for farming and society.

By looking after land, water and animals,

and using resources wisely, we are finding

a path to regenerate the environment.

It’s all part of our transition to a more

sustainable way of dairying.

Tiakina te whenua i tēnei rā,

hei oranga tangata mō ngā rā e heke mai nei.

Caring for the land today,

so that the land cares for us tomorrow.

Healthy

Environment

In this section:

50

Our farming and

manufacturing activities

52

Working with farmers

54

Managing operations

56

Land and water

63

Climate change

70

Packaging and waste

74

Animal health and biosecurity

Healthy Environment

47FONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 201946FONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 2019

BACK TO CONTENTS

Healthy
Environment

We need to protect, enhance and

regenerate our environment to safeguard

opportunities for future generations.

A strong healthy environment supports healthy and enjoyable

lives, and improves the resilience of the planet. It is also the

foundation for sustainable, protable dairy businesses.

Dairying is a big part of New Zealand and has been for almost  

years. Farming families have made the most of being able to grow

grass all year-round, producing delicious, fresh milk. Globally, food

production systems are facing a transformational challenge to meet

the demands of a growing population within environmental limits.

New Zealand farmers lead the world in many aspects of

sustainable dairying, with high productivity, year-round pasture

grazing and lower use of supplementary feeds. However, the scale

of the industry in New Zealand means that our environmental

footprint is of national signicance.

To achieve positive environmental outcomes requires working

together to deliver improvements at scale. Working collaboratively

on our environmental challenges will help build social cohesion

and accelerate progress on environmental outcomes.

The challenges faced are signicant and the changes required will

take time, but we want to play our part. We are working in our

sites, with our farmers and with our communities to face those

challenges and improve our environmental performance, so our

farmers will be able to farm for generations to come.

How Fonterra is making this happen:

We are working together to achieve a healthy environment

for farming and society. To do this we will:

Improve the health and biodiversity of our land

and waters by having a regenerative mindset, reducing

the impacts of farming and manufacturing and working in

partnership with others

Lead the transition to a low-carbon future

by investing in innovation and infrastructure to

remove greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from

our supply chain

Meet the growing nutritional demand through

improvements in productivity and minimising waste

from farm to consumer.

• Farm Environment Plans: •«® of our farms in

New Zealand have Farm Environment Plans tailored

to their speci’c farm – see page 

• GHG emissions: Our global GHG emissions from

manufacturing were reduced by •˜,«€– tCO

•

-e from FY†ª

but estimated global GHG emissions from farming were

up ̄–ª,ª–˜ tCO

•

-e – see page 

• Transitioning from coal: Our Brightwater site went

live co-’ring biomass and we trialled wood pellets

at Te Awamutu – see page 

• New targets set: We have set new global targets

for recyclable packaging and solid waste to land’ll

– see page 

KEY ITEMS FROM FY‹Œ

Share our dairy expertise with

small-scale producers (‚.ž)

Increase productivity through

sustainable practices (‚.)

Fonterra’s contribution

to the SDGs from a healthy

environmental perspective.

Reduce the impact of farming and

manufacturing on water quality (¡.ž)

Increase water e¢ciency in areas of

constrained supply (¡.)

Protect and restore

freshwater ecosystems (¡.¡)

Reduce impact of farming

and manufacturing on

marine ecosystems (‹.‹)

Manage and use natural

resources e¢ciently (‹‚.‚)

Reduce food waste throughout

our supply chain (‹‚.ž)

Reduce waste generation

through our operations and

product packaging (‹‚.”)

Reduce emissions across our supply chain

Support farmers to build

resilience to climate change (‹ž.‹)

Reduce impact of farming

and manufacturing on

freshwater ecosystems (‹”.‹)

Promote the sustainable management

of forests and support a•orestation (‹”.‚)

Healthy Environment

†ƒFONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 

HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT

†•FONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 

BACK TO CONTENTS

Our farming
and manufacturing

activities

SAUDI ARABIANETHERLANDS

…

MANUFACTURING

SITE

…

MANUFACTURING

SITE

ETHIOPIA

…

MANUFACTURING

SITE

LATIN AMERICA

¢CHILE, BRAZIL, VENEZUELA£

”

MANUFACTURING

SITES

…

”…„m LITRES

RAW MILK COLLECTED

AUSTRALIA

š

MANUFACTURING

SITES

…,”“˜m LITRES

RAW MILK COLLECTED

SRI LANKA

…

MANUFACTURING

SITE

…˜m LITRES

RAW MILK COLLECTED

CHINA

ƒš†m LITRES

RAW MILK COLLECTED

MALAYSIA

ƒ

MANUFACTURING

SITES

INDONESIA

…

MANUFACTURING

SITE

 During FY we divested of our Inlaca business in Venezuela and our Tip Top business in New Zealand. This map shows the status as at the end of FY but the raw milk collected

and environmental data on subsequent pages includes the contribution from businesses under our operational control (i.e. part year for those businesses divested).

We are a New Zealand co-operative

– it’s where our shareholder

farmers are based and where we

source most of our milk. We also

have operations around the world

to help us create the most value

for that New Zealand milk.

This map shows the location of the manufacturing

sites we manage and that we report on in this section.

The litres of raw milk collected refers to the total

raw milk that we collected from farms in the region

during FY.

We directly manage a small number of farms around

the world. There are  farms in New Zealand to help

our manufacturing sites manage excess nutrients, seven

farms in China producing fresh milk, one training farm

in Chile and one in Sri Lanka. These are not shown.

NEW ZEALAND

Ġ

MANUFACTURING

SITES

…

…š,…’ƒm LITRES

RAW MILK COLLECTED

Healthy Environment

HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT

… FONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT  …—FONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 

BACK TO CONTENTS

Our Raw Milk Harvesting Standard sets out the minimum
requirements that all farmers must meet. It applies across all

markets we source milk from and forms the basis of the on-farm

audits that we conduct.

Through a combination of our own sta­ and third parties, we

regularly assess supplying farms around the world:

• In New Zealand, every supplying farm is visited each year by

an independent farm assessor. In addition, a more-detailed

assessment is completed for each farm, once every ve years

approximately. This year we completed ,¥¥ of these detailed

audits (£ of supplying farms) and .¦£ of farms were referred

for follow-up.

• In Australia, farms are visited multiple times each year by our

own sta­ and independent assessments are scheduled based

on prior compliance levels. Every farm is assessed at least once

every two years and in FY,  ¢£ of farmers were assessed.

Of the farms where we arranged assessment, £ were referred

for follow-up due to a critical or major non-compliance



.

• In Latin America, each farm is assessed by a combination of our

own sta­ and third parties. In addition, our New Zealand based

team audits a random selection of farms once every three years.

• In China, our farms are under our direct control. These farms

are subject to assessments by our New Zealand Milk Sourcing

team and Internal Audit team. These farms have also been

independently assessed to the benchmark food safety and

quality standard for farms called SQF.

On farms where it is identied that requirements are

not being met, our Sustainable Dairying Advisors (SDAs),

or equivalent, develop an action plan with the farmer which

includes target dates for completion. We may also suspend

the collection of milk until we are satised that all minimum

requirements are being met and that any actions required to

avoid a repeat of the issue have been completed. Milk collection

suspension notices were issued for   farms in New Zealand.

The main reasons for suspension notices were related to fencing

waterways and e¹uent management. The majority of farms

addressed the issues identied and are supplying milk.

The remainder no longer supply Fonterra.

We see a healthy environment as the

foundation for a strong economy and a

sustainable dairy industry.

Our farmers are at the heart of our Co-operative and we will

support them to keep innovating so that they can continue to

farm for generations to come.

Today, more than ¥ £ of our milk comes from the farmers in

New Zealand who own Fonterra. We also source some milk in

other countries so we can meet the needs of our customers and

generate the most value from our New Zealand milk (see map

on page ).

In this section, we cover farming practices on all farms directly

supplying milk to Fonterra’s manufacturing sites globally.

Farms we manage

We directly manage a small number of farms around the world.

In New Zealand, we manage  farms which neighbour our

manufacturing sites. We use these farms to manage excess

water and nutrients from our manufacturing sites. The water

and nutrients improve soil health and support pasture growth,

which allows us to grow and supply supplementary animal

feeds to our farmers.

In China, we operate seven large-scale dairy farms and produce

raw milk for use in local products. This complements the dairy

products we export to China from New Zealand and Australia.

These farms use a housed farming system rather than the

pasture-based model most commonly found on the farms which

supply us with milk. We also directly manage farms for training

and demonstration purposes – one in Sri Lanka and one in Chile.

Expectations for supplying farms

We encourage and support farmers to adopt good management

practices and to continuously improve protability, environmental

e’ciency and resilience. We have a set of policies and standards

that support sustainable dairy farming. Our Terms of Supply and

Farmer Handbooks set expectations for farmers when it comes to

people, the environment, animal health and welfare, biosecurity,

and food safety and quality.

Working together with farmers

We have farmer engagement and support programmes in every

country where we collect raw milk from farms. These help us to

build relationships with farmers, communicate our requirements

with them and support them to improve their farming practices.

We tailor these programmes to re–ect the priority farming issues

in the country and to encourage performance that goes beyond

the minimum requirements.

This year we launched The Co-operative Di­erence in

New Zealand. It is a straight-forward way of bringing together

what our farmers need to know today, and what they need to

prepare for in the future. It also celebrates farmers who go the

extra mile to make our Co-operative more sustainable.

We want to make it easier for farmers to know what needs to be

done and why it matters. Farming is complicated enough these

days and we believe there are ways we can work better together.

The Co-operative Di­erence covers nancial tools; environmental

topics; animal welfare and biosecurity; people and community;

and milk quality topics.

The Co-operative Di©erence:

• Brings together existing on-farm requirements and makes

them easier to understand.

• Recognises farmers who go above these requirements.

• Gives farmers clear guidance on likely future requirements

and trends.

• Saves farmers time by removing duplication and streamlining

reporting requirements.

• Helps our Co-op protect its market position, strengthen our

sustainability claims, and drive demand for our products.

• Supports farmers with on-farm practices by working together

and providing industry-leading assistance and using our

industry partnerships where possible.

• Claries what will happen when requirements aren’t met,

supports those who are struggling, and takes a rm line

with those who refuse to change.

Providing support and services

Our farmers can make the most of the Co-op’s knowledge,

expertise and services in managing their farms. Our sustainable

dairying, milk quality and animal welfare specialists are in every

region and in New Zealand and Australia our ¦-hour Service

Centre team is only ever a phone call away.

In New Zealand we operate a network of ¤¥ Farm Source™

stores, o­ering local knowledge, product advice and expertise.

These stores operate as retail farm supply stores for the farming

community and wider public while also o­ering specic support

services for our supplying shareholders. Farm Source is a wholly

owned subsidiary covered by the same management systems

and policies as our other operations. It provides seasonal deals

for everything from fencing to calf feed and o­ers eligible farmers

benets such as  day interest free purchases and the ability

to earn Farm Source Reward Dollars on every dollar spent in our

stores. From June , eligible farmers can also spread payments

or defer them for six months on all Farm Source store purchases

over § .

In Australia, we do not have retail stores but by leveraging our

scale, we are able to provide special deals and services for farmers

supplying us in Australia through our Farm Source™ Partners

service. We also provided a free electricity tari­ comparison

service for ¥ Australian farms.

Supporting our farmers underpins

everything we do. In person, in digital,

in partnership.

Well dened Terms of Supply to protect

the Co-operative here and now.

Recognition for farmers who are

moving beyond the Terms of Supply.

All on-farm activities aligned

across ve focus areas.

Clear guidance on future direction

based on emerging customer and

community trends.











Working

with

farmers

C

O



O

P



A

N

D

P

R

O

S

P

E

R

I

T

Y

E

N

V

I

R

O

N

M

E

N

T

A

N

I

M

A

L

S

M

I

L

K

Our Core

Terms of supply

O

u

r


F

u

t

u

r

e


A

s

p

i

r

a

t

i

o

n

s

On-Farm Support

P

E

O

P

L

E


A

N

D

C

O

M

M

U

N

I

T

Y











O

u

r


N

e

x

t


S

t

e

p

s


-


K

i


t

e


t

i

h

i


 This gure is calculated excluding farms in Tasmania, where the audits are undertaken by

the local authority and we do not currently have visibility of non-compliance details.

Healthy Environment

HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT

…€FONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT  …­FONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 

BACK TO CONTENTS

Signi§cant spills
This year in New Zealand, there were   signicant spills

associated with tanker events either on farm or on a highway

and totalling about ¤, litres of milk. The events ranged from

  litres to ¤, litres. The ¤, litre event was an accident

involving a contractor’s tanker, which resulted in an environmental

non-compliance and ne (covered in Environment compliance

to left). At our Whareroa site, , litres of nitric acid and

,  litres of cream were spilled to drains. The spill of nitric acid

occurred when a bund failed. The procedures for hose connections

were subsequently reviewed with all drivers at the site.

Environmental compliance

In the past year, our operational sites had twelve incidents of non-

compliance with environmental regulations which resulted in nes

or non-monetary sanctions. Ten of these occurred in New Zealand,

with seven incurring nes, penalties or cost recoveries totalling

§¦,¥¦ and two incurring abatement notices only.

In Australia, our Dennington site incurred a ne of A§‡,‡ 

(§¦, ) from the Water Authority for a discharge of wastewater

to the local municipal treatment plant that did not meet the

acceptance criteria of the trade waste agreement. No clarication

was provided by the Authority on the specic criteria breached.

Our Dennington team has reviewed the event and the robustness

of our biological wastewater treatment plant to further improve

treatment processes on site until all manufacturing operations

cease in November .

Our China Farms received one ne related to an environmental

non-compliance. At Ying Cowbell farm, an EPAº-approved

vendor, who was contracted to transport e¹uent pond sludge

for application to land, did not apply the sludge according to the

dened rules. The EPA concluded that Ying Cowbell had a “non-

delegable” duty regarding the handling of the farm e¹uent and

therefore Fonterra was ned RMB¦, (§¥¤,). However,

the vendor admitted that they had not been working in line with

the contract and paid RMB ¦, to Fonterra to reimburse

it for the ne paid.

In addition to the non-compliances listed above, there were some

minor non-compliances, which did not result in any monetary

or non-monetary sanctions.

In all cases we have taken action to improve processes and

minimise the risk of further non-compliances.

Independent evaluation and

certi§cation of sites

Our manufacturing sites are subject to regular internal and

third-party audits. Internal audits are conducted by sta­

independent of the site and are used to identify areas for

improvement. Third-party audits give regulatory authorities and

our customers independent assessments of our performance.

For example, independent audits against the Sedex Member

Ethical Trade Audit (SMETA) standard for labour practices,

environment, health and safety and business practices are

required by some of our customers. Other customers require

us to undertake an annual assessment by EcoVadis.

Other third-party audits are part of independent certication of

site Environmental Management Systems (EMS) to international

standards, such as ISO¦. Independent certication to

ISO¦, or an equivalent such as EnviroMark Diamond,

provides a third-party evaluation of the performance of our

EMS. This year our Heerenveen site was certied to ISO¦

and, with divestments, at the end of FY, more than ¤¢£ of our

manufacturing sites are certied to this level or equivalent.

We are committed to taking a leading

industry approach to environmental

management for our manufacturing

operations.

Our manufacturing sites, farmers and local communities share

the same environment, with interconnected environmental

challenges. Some aspects must be considered globally such as

climate change (see page ) and packaging waste (see page ),

but we must also consider the localised potential environmental

impacts of our sites, particularly on freshwater quality and

biodiversity (see page ).

Over  £ of our processing by raw milk supply happens in

New Zealand or Australia, but we also manage several other sites

around the world.

The Fonterra Group Environmental Policy, updated in FY,

denes our approach to the management of all environmental

aspects relevant to our activities including, but not limited to,

water, climate and energy, waste and pollution prevention across

our global value chain. This includes assessing and managing

environmental risks, taking a precautionary approach to decision-

making to prevent damage to the environment or human health

where serious threats may exist and implementing best-practice

environmental management systems. The policy is published

on our web site.

www.fonterra.com‰environmentalpolicy

All sites have a manager specically responsible for environmental

compliance. At most sites, this is a dedicated environmental

manager and they are often supported by a site Environmental

Management team. Their focus is on managing site-wide

environmental performance and compliance with local

environmental requirements.

We share some manufacturing sites, which are operated

by joint-venture partners and we make use of some

third-party manufacturing. These sites are excluded

from our performance reporting.

Managing

operations

 EPA – Environmental protection agency

Healthy Environment

HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT

……FONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT  …†FONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 

BACK TO CONTENTS

What weʼve been doing
Sustainable catchments

Achieving sustainable water catchments in the regions where

we operate means working with others to help protect and

regenerate the waterways. We want to connect and empower

farmers, manufacturing sites and local communities so they get

involved and can accelerate progress towards local community

environmental aspirations.

Our Living Water partnership with the New Zealand Department

of Conservation is focused on ve catchments to identify

game-changing and scalable solutions that demonstrate

dairying and freshwater can thrive together. So far, ‡ trials

of di­erent tools and approaches to improve freshwater

have been started and seven solutions have been scaled

or are being used by others.

For example, in Waituna, a new approach to mapping

physiographical factors – such as slope, drainage, soil type –

has been developed. It can be used to optimise the design

and placement of water quality improvements in a catchment.

Based on the success of the Waituna work, a data set for all

New Zealand has been generated and made available for use

by everybody, in all regions. At Pukorokoro-Miranda, we have

developed and successfully trialled a prioritisation tool which

our partners, Western Firth Catchment Group, will now use

in other catchments to make sure they are taking the right

environmental improvement actions in the right place.

Beyond the ve Living Water catchments we’ve been working

alongside local stakeholders such as regional councils, the

Department of Conservation, iwi, farming leaders and other

industry members in catchments across New Zealand. Our aim

is to build on existing community e­orts and work with other

land users and businesses to help achieve the community’s

priorities. In many cases, these include not just water quality

and freshwater biodiversity, but also predator management and

related terrestrial biodiversity (see opposite page for examples).

Healthy freshwater, soil and ecosystems

are essential to the long-term success

of our business, and to the communities

where we live, work and farm.

There are limited resources and impacts to them are experienced

locally. We believe protecting and restoring the environment is

critical to safeguard opportunities for future generations, and this

regenerative mindset must become embedded through our global

value chain. That’s why we are committed to working proactively

with local stakeholders on catchment-wide solutions.

This section covers our impact on land and water arising from

the manufacturing operations that we manage globally and in

relation to the farmers from whom we collect milk.

Our approach

Our manufacturing sites withdraw water from a range of sources

and discharge wastewater. Due to the evaporation of water from

raw milk to make our products, most of our sites are net providers

of water. Sites measure their water use and monitor water

quality and, as we upgrade or build new plants, we make use of

resource-e’cient technologies and aim to adopt leading industry

standards. We also seek process improvements and behaviour

changes which can deliver further improvements.

We are working with farmers to identify their environmental

impact risks and prioritise improvement actions specic to

their situation. Most of our farmers operate pasture-based

farming systems and rely on rainfall as their main water source.

We encourage and support farmers to adopt Good Farming

Practices related to water, soil health and biodiversity including

exclusion of stock from waterways, riparian management,

nutrient management and low-till to no-till land management.

Please refer to “Working with farmers” on page  and “Managing

operations” on page  for more information on our general

approach to improving our environmental performance.

Land

and water

Living Water Catchments

Collective action

on catchments

Our Living Water partnership with

the New Zealand Department of

Conservation is focused on §ve

catchments. The lessons learned

from this partnership are being

used to support farmer and

community action in other

catchments across New Zealand.

SOUTHLAND

In the Waituna Creek, manuka

bundles and logs have been installed

to slow water –ows and provide

habitat for native sh such as the

giant kokopu. Four Living Water

projects have integrated Mātauranga

Māori



alongside western science.

For example, our work at Waituna is all

based on a co-governance approach

with seven other organisations and

Mātauranga Māori is woven into all

work streams. See Whakamana

te Waituna at:

www.waituna.org.nz

CANTERBURY

In Upper Selwyn, habitat

is being restored and an

electric barrier has been

installed to protect the

endangered kōwaro

(mudsh) from predators.

HAWKES BAY

In the Tukipo catchment

a project is underway

to construct a treatment

wetland to improve

water quality.

WAIKATO

We have expanded our

hydroseeding trial to create a

biodiversity corridor along a farm

drain between Lake Rotopiko and

Lake Rotumanuka. Hydroseeding

is a new e’cient spray-on

approach for native planting.

NORTHLAND

In the Ruakaka catchment we

have funded the Mountains to Sea

Conservation Trust to deliver their

Whitebait Connection education

programme into schools and to

increase community understanding

of the water quality and ecological

health issues in the catchment.

‹

Wairua River in Northland

‹

Ararira-LII River in Canterbury

—

”

Pūkorokoro-Miranda in Hauraki

”

Waituna Lagoon in Southland

•

“

Lakes Areare, Ruatuna, Rotomānuka in Waikato

“

•

—

Community catchments

Living Water catchments

 An indigenous Māori world view and knowledge perspective.

Healthy Environment

HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT

…’FONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT  …“FONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 

BACK TO CONTENTS

Improving water quality and reducing
use at factories

Our Nutrient Management team has continued to improve

the way we treat excess nutrients retrieved from wastewater

treatment at some of our sites. The nutrients, which originally

came from collected milk, are used to improve soil health on

our farms to grow grass and maize silage. This means we can

‘close the loop’ back and use the silage to help cows produce

quality milk. All nine dairy farms managed by the Nutrient

Management team now have Farm Environment Plans and

a further . ha of riparian planting was completed this year.

For water e’ciency, we have replaced our New Zealand only

target with a new global target aligned with best-practice thinking.

We will reduce water used at sites in water-stressed regions by

‡£. Rather than having a target which applies regardless of water

availability, the new target prioritises improvements where water is

potentially constrained but we are also still committed to ongoing

improvements in water e’ciency at all other sites. In FY, six

New Zealand sites: Edendale, Clandeboye, Dareld, Brightwater,

Licheld, and Maungaturoto; and one Australian site: Stanhope,

were identied as in water-stressed regions



.

At our Whareroa site, work has been completed to reuse water

evaporators and reverse osmosis plants in our boiler and cooling

towers. This is expected to save over ‡ million litres of water

per year from FY. See the case studies on the next page for

some further examples.

Prioritising on-farm improvements with

Farm Environment Plans

On farm in New Zealand, our top priority is helping farmers

establish Farm Environment Plans (FEPs). A farmer’s FEP is unique

to their farm and includes a detailed map of their farm identifying

areas of existing strength and prioritised improvement areas

for action.

The FEPs consider land and water aspects such as the risk of

sediment or faecal matter transfer into waterways, the risk

of nutrient losses to water bodies, maintaining soil structure,

protecting biodiversity and, where applicable, the management

of irrigation systems to minimise the amount of water used to

meet production objectives.

With stock on dairy farms already excluded from more than

£ of permanent waterways and more than ,  km of

additional small, intermittent waterways, FEPs now focus on the

potential environmental impacts across the farm, from nutrient

management to land and soil management. ࢣ of farms now

have a documented riparian management plan which not only

helps improve water quality and biodiversity but also helps

improve terrestrial biodiversity. With adoption rate of our nutrient

management programme already over ¤£, this year we have

launched a new nitrogen risk management scorecard. Nitrogen

loss risk is calculated across six farm management practices to

help farmers further reduce the risk of nitrogen loss and minimise

the risk of excess nutrients moving from their soil into waterways.

Supporting farmers to achieve Good Farming Practice through

FEPs is how we can make the biggest di­erence to areas such

as soil health. Additionally, we are working with industry partners

to help increase the adoption of farming practices which reduce

soil compaction, such as the appropriate use of stand-o­

infrastructure during periods of soil saturation.

Understanding soil moisture and soil temperature can help

farmers further improve their management practices. This

includes reducing water use but also improving fertiliser and

e¹uent application. By considering the existing moisture and

temperature before application, grass growth can be improved

and nutrient losses minimised. This year in Australia, we

commenced a trial of soil moisture monitoring on  farms

in Northern Victoria. We also arranged and launched a special

deal for our farmers in New Zealand to buy soil moisture probes

via our Farm Source™ stores.

Land

and water CONTINUED

CASE STUDY

Teamwork at Hautapu

Rather than making one single large change, the whole

Hautapu site has been working together to make a lot

of small changes that add up to a big improvement. The

’rst step was understanding the usage of water in greater

detail across the site. This focus began in FY†ª and involved

mapping the water use and installing some extra metering.

It was then up to the entire team to make the diˆerence.

Departments had targets for savings and took responsibility

for investigating excess usage and they continue to do so.

For example, improvements were gained by improving the

e ciency of cleaning-in-place processes and returning

the water condensed from steam for use in the boilers.

The rewards have been reaped in FY†¤, using †˜† million

litres less than FY†ª. That’s enough water to ’ll more than

˜€ Olympic-sized swimming pools. The eˆorts not only

reduced water use, they also improved energy e ciency

and saved wastewater treatment costs too.

CASE STUDY

Doing our bit at Edendale

At Edendale this year, we implemented a system to capture

the water extracted from milk as we turn it into powder.

Using a ’ltration process called reverse osmosis, the water

is treated so we can reuse it in the factory instead of using

fresh water.

We estimate this initiative saved between ̄‚‚- ̄–‚m«

of water per day when it went live in February, and can

save about †,‚‚‚m

«

water per day in optimal operating

conditions. This means we draw less water from the local

aquifer and we can do our part to help ensure it remains

a sustainable resource for the local community. Following

two exceptionally dry winters, monitoring of the aquifer

level has shown a downward trend but, this year there

are positive signs of recovery.

Water is a precious resource.

We want to look after it and use it wisely.

All our manufacturing sites look for ways they can reduce

or reuse water but here, we explain how two sites have

achieved big improvements in completely di©erent ways.

 We determine whether a site is in a water-stressed region using a combination of independent

water-stress information (e.g. WRI Aqueduct) and local information (e.g. water allocation).

Healthy Environment

…ƒFONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 

HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT

…•FONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 

BACK TO CONTENTS

On-farm New Zealand
IndicatorTarget PerformanceCommentary

FY ’FY •FY ƒ

Farms with Farm

Environment Plans

(FEPs)

…„„› by

end ƒ„ƒ”

–…ƒ›

…

ƒ˜›

Our goal for FY was for a further , farms to

have completed an FEP and this has been achieved.

We expect at least a further , to be completed

during FY and we are exploring options for more

FEPs to be delivered each year.

Farms participating in

nutrient management

reporting and

benchmarking

…„„› by

˜„ Nov ƒ„…”

†”›†š›†’›

The e­ort to achieve this target was initially under-

estimated and so it has taken longer than expected

to reach what is considered full adoption and

completion of this target. This year we have launched

a new Nitrogen Risk Scorecard (see page ).

Farms with waterways

have documented

riparian management

plan

…„„› by ˜…

May ƒ„ƒ”

–›ƒ”›˜š›

This is now being progressed with Farm Environment

Plans (see above) but due to prior work completed,

overall progress is more advanced.

Farms with water

meters on signižcant

water intakes

“”› by

ƒ„ƒ„

”…›”˜›”–›

Through FEP’s we are focusing on driving e’cient

water use by all farms, whether for freshwater

irrigation, shed water uses or stock water supply.

FEP’s ensure the water use mitigations are suitable

and applicable for the individual farm and will drive

the best outcome. We will continue to monitor

the presence of water meters but we are no longer

pursuing this target.

Manufacturing

Improvement in water

e°ciency (water used

per cubic metre of milk

processed)

ƒ„› reduction

by ƒ„ƒ„ from

FY…” baseline

for NZ

….˜›

reduction

from FY 

ƒ.–›

reduction

from FY 

’.”›

reduction

from FY 

We made signicant progress this year and it would

have been a greater decrease if the benets from

improvements at Dareld had not been delayed for

extra safety checks.

This New Zealand target has now been superseded

by a global target focused on absolute reduction at

sites in water-stressed regions.

Improvement in water

e°ciency (water used

per cubic metre of milk

processed)

Measure

and report

(global)

––„.–›

improvement

from FY¥

Our water reduction target is now focused on sites

in water-stressed regions but we will continue to

monitor water e’ciency across all our sites.

Manufacturing

sites are treating

wastewater to leading

industry standards

…„„› of

sites by ƒ„ƒ’

(global)

ƒ”›ƒ’›ƒ†›

Due to improved management of irrigation at

Studholme the site met the required standard

this year. Combined with the divestment of our

Venezuelan business, this gave ‡£ improvement.

Water withdrawn by source FY ƒ

Volume

(‚‚‚m

«

)

Percentage

Surface water (including water from

wetlands, rivers, lakes and oceans)

•–,ª€• €¤®

Groundwater† ̄,€• ̄

««®

Municipal water supplies or other

public or private water utilities

¤,€ ̄«

†ª®

Other (e.g. rainwater collection)‚ ‚®

Grand Total”ƒ,š–ƒ

Water discharge FY ƒ

Volume

(‚‚‚m

«

)

Quality

(COD

­

mgžL)

Discharged to irrigation† ̄, ̄˜•

†,••†

Discharged to river•–,‚¤•¹

̄•


Discharged to ocean†«,•€† •,†‚–

Discharged to municipal–,•† ̄

†,ª ̄€

Discharged to other‚ ‚

Grand Total’…,˜……


 Since reporting last year we have revised our approach for recognising those FEPs delivered to our farmers

by other organisations. This has resulted in an increase for FY from … to ….

 Chemical Oxygen Demand – an indicator of water quality measuring chemicals in water that can be oxidised.

ˆ In FY, the discharged to river volume was understated by ˆ. million m

ˆ

due to two omitted cooling water out¦ows.

Globally our absolute water usage has reduced this year by .¦£

and we remain a net producer of water due to the water collected

when we turn milk into powders. A contribution to the reduction

this year is the divestment of three manufacturing sites.

Water withdrawn and discharged gures include the contribution

of these sites for the part of the year that they were under our

management control. Excluding those sites from the entire year

the global reduction in water used was .£.

Land

and water CONTINUED

Our Performance

On farm

• We w

ill continue to support our New Zealand farmers as

they establish Farm Environment Plans (FEP), focusing

on the speci’c priorities for their farm.

• We will use this approach to drive improvements that

positively impact water quality, water use, soil health

and biodiversity.

• We will investigate applying our approach to tailored

farm environment planning in other countries where we

source milk, and aim to set new targets that cover our

global on-farm activities around water.

Manufacturing

• We will continue to focus on operational improvements

within our manufacturing sites, sharing lessons from sites

that successfully improve water e ciency with our other

sites around the world.

• We will continue to progress a prioritised sequence of

such investments to reduce our water usage and upgrade

our wastewater treatment to leading standards.

WHATʼS NEXT

Good progress.

Some progress or slight delay. O— track.

FY performance:

Healthy Environment

HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT

“ FONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT  “—FONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 

BACK TO CONTENTS

“I wanted to demystify climate
change, make it more real and

more achievable for farmers”

Andrew Booth.

Agriculture and associated land use

change account for about ­†œ of global

greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.

Agricultural production is already facing signicant disruption

from changes to climate and increased variability in weather

patterns. All food producers must therefore reduce GHG

emissions and adapt to the e­ects a changing climate has on

agricultural production.

New Zealand’s emissions prole is unique as nearly half of our

greenhouse gases come from the agriculture sector. While most

developed nations face the challenge of transitioning industrial

processes and moving to renewable energy, we must nd a way

to manage our animals’ natural emissions while also addressing

the use of fossil fuels in transport and manufacturing.

We are committed to limiting global average temperature increase

to .  degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels, and we see the

introduction of climate legislation in New Zealand as a critical

step to achieving this.

To move to a sustainable future, we need food that is nutritious

and as emissions e’cient as possible. However, there is a huge

variance between the most and least e’cient producers of each

food type. New Zealand farmers are already some of the most

carbon e’cient in the world, due to our less-intensive e’cient

pasture system.

The New Zealand Biological Emissions Reference Group

identied that total biological emissions in New Zealand

could reduce by £ to £ by ‡ (from a ¢ base) and

by £ to ¦¥£ by  . However, to achieve these reductions

the agriculture sector will need to deploy a comprehensive

package of breakthrough mitigation activities, including some

that are not yet technically and commercially viable.

For Fonterra and its farmer owners, this challenge is signicant.

Our business represents approximately £ of New Zealand’s

gross GHG emissions, with £ of those emissions from farms;

£ per cent from manufacturing and £ from distribution to

markets across the world.

All scientic projections show that the e­ect of global warming

will continue to increase for decades to come, irrespective of

e­orts by the global community to start to reduce emissions. We

therefore support the development of national adaptation plans.

Based on climate change projections, food production in many

parts of the world is expected to experience negative impacts

from resulting changes in natural resources. However, a large

proportion of Fonterra's existing supply base is in regions where

impacts may be less severe than elsewhere, and there is a good

opportunity for New Zealand to continue to produce safe, world-

class quality food products.

This section covers our impact on, and our response to climate

change from the manufacturing operations that we manage

globally and in relation to the farmers from whom we collect milk.

Our Approach

The GHG emissions associated with dairy products primarily

come from the cows on the farms. The largest component of this

is the methane the cows produce while digesting feed, emitted

mainly through belching (see page  for a breakdown for

New Zealand farming).

Within our own operations, the majority of our GHG emissions

arise from the energy we use. Using heat to pasteurise milk and

dry it into powders is great for food safety, and for turning a

short shelf-life, seasonal product into long-life valuable nutrition

which is very e’cient to transport. But it does require signicant

amounts of reliable energy.

The GHG emissions from the distribution of our nished products

to our customers around the world only account for about £ of

our total GHG emissions.

We have set specic targets for GHG emissions arising from our

farming and manufacturing operations and we have initiatives

underway to help achieve these.

Please refer to “Working with farmers” on page  and

“Managing operations” on page  for further details

of our approach.

Climate

change

CASE STUDY

Farmer Focus

Andrew and Vicky Booth are –‚:–‚ sharemilkers on Andrew’s

parents’ dairy farm at Titoki in Northland. Andrew grew up on the

farm before heading oˆ to Lincoln University to study and where

he met Vicky. After getting experience working on some other

farms, Andrew and Vicky returned to the family farm in •‚†‚.

Gradually, building on the work his father started, they made

improvements to the farm, fencing oˆ native bush blocks and

waterways and over the last few years they have planted large

riparian areas in native plants. Working with the Integrated

Kaipara Harbour Management Group to source native plants

and local schools for some planting help, the Booths have

established more than ††,‚‚‚ natives. But planting is just the

start. Andrew has found that manual weeding, especially in the

’rst year is vital to stop the native plants being overrun.

In October •‚†ª, the Booths got a Farm Environment Plan (FEP).

Having already tackled the big obvious jobs, Andrew ’nds the

FEP useful to record what has been done and, working with

the Sustainable Dairy Advisor, the framework helps prioritise

the next improvement actions to get the best return to the

environment for the eˆort and cost.

When DairyNZ was running its climate change information

sessions back in •‚†ª, the science was all quite new to Andrew

but it interested him and he wanted to know more. He

volunteered to be a climate change ambassador so he could

learn and share what farmers can do to play their part.

What he found was farmers are already taking steps to reduce

their footprint without knowing how their improvement is

connected to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. For now,

the biggest reductions are still from good management such

as being e cient with feed, optimising stock numbers and

reducing replacement rates. Andrew was involved in the pilot

of the farm-speci’c GHG report which Fonterra is now rolling

out to all farmers. He ’nds it a useful tool to get a clearer picture

of the where the emissions are coming from, what changes will

help and looking at the trend over time.

Andrew and Vicky were the only farmers amongst the eight

’nalists in the Cawthron Institute’s New Zealand River Awards

this year which recognise those who are working to improve

river health.

Healthy Environment

“€FONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 

HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT

“­FONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 

BACK TO CONTENTS

Climate
change CONTINUED

support decision-making. To support our farmers, we have been

working on a trial of farm-specic GHG reporting. The report

provides the farmers with a breakdown of their estimated on-farm

GHG emissions by the source of those emissions to help them

with decision-making.

Our goal is for all our New Zealand famers to have a report by

the end of . The pilot process has also established a group

of GHG ambassadors, farmers who understand the sources of

GHG emissions and the management changes which can reduce

these and they are sharing their learnings with other farmers.

Engaging on proposed legislation

In New Zealand this year a Zero-Carbon Amendment Bill has been

subject to consultation and Fonterra supports this legislation.

We support the establishment of the Climate Change Commission,

the development of a national adaptation plan and the split gas

approach which recognises the di­erences between short-lived

and longer-lived gases.

We support the ‡ methane target and consider that the

  target should be provisionally set at up to ¦£ net

reduction from ¢, with reviews of the targets based on

scientic and economic analysis. It is very clear that both

the ‡ and   methane targets are very ambitious and

further research and development is needed to achieve them.

Investing in breakthrough technologies

We invest in cutting-edge technologies to reduce agricultural

emissions through the Pastoral Greenhouse Gas Research

Consortium (PGgRC). This year we also started work with

New Zealander, Dr Ian Hunter at the Massachusetts Institute

of Technology and started work with DSM to investigate the

use of their methane inhibitors with pasture-based farming.

We want to identify breakthrough technologies which can provide

a step reduction in the biological emissions produced by cows

and promote such solutions widely so they have an impact wider

than the regions where we farm.

While there are some promising ideas, such as cow breeding,

feeds and inhibitors, we also face some dilemmas. For example,

to maximise the e­ectiveness of inhibitors administered through

supplementary feed, the cows would need to spend more time

in sheds or on feed pads being fed the special feed. This not

only increases the farming costs

¦

, it is at odds with the growing

consumer interest in pasture-based cows. This means our focus

is on inhibitors that can be fed at milking time, and then reduce

emissions while the cow is back out on the pasture.

Transitioning to low-carbon energy sources

Finding viable alternatives to coal is our rst priority. Our coal

use now only occurs in New Zealand, where a third of our sites

still rely on it, primarily in the South Island. The scale of our coal

use and the lack of economically viable alternatives means that

we will remain reliant on coal for longer than we would like.

However, this year, we have committed to not installing any new

coal boilers and not increasing our capacity to burn coal at any

of our manufacturing sites. Our emissions from coal this year

remained essentially the same as FY¥, despite processing more

milk. Fluctuations in milk volumes in di­erent regions, and the

need to retain a secure supply of energy, means our usage of coal

will continue to change a bit from season to season.

In the North Island, we are looking at options to transition

our coal sites, including to natural gas. However, we recognise

that transitioning directly to renewable sources of energy is a

better option.

In the South Island, where natural gas is not available, we are

progressing a combination of wood biomass and increased use

of electricity.

The challenge with adopting wood biomass in New Zealand and

Australia is the security of supply and obtaining su’cient volumes

within a reasonable distance of the sites to allow full displacement

of fossil fuel. However, this year we completed the conversion

of our Brightwater site to co-re wood biomass with coal and

completed a trial of wood pellets at our Te Awamutu site

(see Case Study on page ).

Based on the feasibility study on electrication that we completed

in FY¥, this year we have progressed our planning to electrify

our Stirling site. This will be a multi-year project installing a set of

di­erent technologies including a mechanical vapor recompressor

(MVR) which operates on very low energy usage, a heat pump and

either an electrode boiler or a biomass boiler.

We have a roadmap of proposed projects to deliver our targeted

reduction in GHG emissions. The capital investment will be staged

with each project involving several years of design and planning

before implementation. We also continue to investigate emerging

technologies which could help the transition for some sites further

down the track.


What we’ve been doing

On-farm life cycle assessments

To help us understand the full carbon life cycle to the farm gate for

our main milk supply regions, and identify areas for improvement,

we commission regular independent analysis. This allows us

to estimate our absolute GHG emissions related to farming

(see graphs on page ).

In New Zealand, for the ¢ž¥ season milk, the estimated

cradle-to-farm-gate carbon intensity, including land use change

(LUC) is .



kilograms of carbon dioxide equivalent per kilogram

of fat-and-protein-corrected milk (kg CO½-ežkg FPCM). Excluding

land use change this is .¢¥ kg CO½-ežkg FPCM, which is up

slightly on our ¦ž  baseline season (.¢¢ kg CO½-ežkg FPCM)

and our highest since ž‡ season. The rise is primarily due

to increased brought-in feed, mostly PKE



, due to drought in

some regions.

This year we undertook our rst assessment for farming in Chile.

For the ¤ž¢ season we estimate that farms supplying our

Soprole subsidiary in Northern Chile had an average of .‡¦




CO½-ežkg FPCM and those supplying our Prolesur subsidiary

in Southern Chile had an average of .‡‡



CO½-ežkg FPCM.

Our most recent assessment for our milk collection regions in

Australia was for  ž¤ season at .¥ kg CO½-ežkg FPCM,

and for China the ¤ž¢ season was .¦ kg CO½-ežkg FPCM

‡

.

Improving on-farm performance

Over the last   years, by improving the e’ciency of their farming

operations, New Zealand farmers have reduced on-farm emissions

intensity by about £

¦

with the strongest improvements from

¢ to ¤.

Over the last two years, Owl Farm, a demonstration farm

 

near

Hamilton that supplies Fonterra, has reduced GHG emissions

by ¥£ and lifted operating prot by ¦£ through improved

management practices. Achieving this is challenging and relies

on highly-skilled farm management and high-quality data to

Improving manufacturing energy e¡ciency

Improving energy e’ciency in our manufacturing operations has

been our long-term strategy and it remains a priority. It reduces

emissions, makes commercial sense and will help our transition to

lower carbon fuel sources. Lower energy requirements potentially

means less capital and less additional operating costs for new

fuels and, it is more likely that viable alternatives will be available.

Our long-running focus on energy e’ciency in New Zealand

manufacturing has delivered . £ reduction in energy intensity

since ‡, up slightly on FY¥ and on target to deliver £

by . Specic projects this year have included multiple

heat recovery projects at our Whareroa site, and installation of

condensing economisers at Kauri, Reporoa and Hautapu. If we had

not delivered this . £ energy e’ciency improvement, this year

we would be using an extra  .¥ petajoules. That’s equivalent to

almost one million barrels of oil, or enough energy to power over

¤, New Zealand households for the year.

Around the world, and excluding divestments during the year,

our manufacturing energy e’ciency improved in seven countries

this year and declined in three, giving an overall improvement of

.¥£ to ¢.‡ GJžtonne of nished goods. There was a similar

pattern for emissions intensity giving an overall improvement

of .¤£ to . ‡ tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent per tonne

of nished goods.

The predicted impact of climate change means that some parts

of the world, such as New Zealand, will be better placed to grow

sustainable nutrition. Therefore, although only about £ of our

total emissions arise from distribution, we continue to seek

opportunities to improve e’ciency in logistics. This year, Kotahi,

our ocean freight partner has achieved a reduction in emissions

by moving more containers on larger, well utilised networks.

The carriers Kotahi works with have also been participating in

the International Maritime Organisation’s global ocean freight

emissions reductions initiative. This requires all carriers to have

either switched to lower emitting fuel types, or implemented CO




reduction systems by .

 In previous reporting for on-farm emissions we had aligned with New Zealand government

reporting and used IPCC Assessment Report £ (AR£) global warming potential (GWP)

factors. This year, to allow easier comparison with other geographies, we have adopted

IPCC AR§, with GWP factors of CO ̈ © , N ̈O © „§ and CHª © . We have recalculated

prior years. This change results in an increase of about §….

 PKE is palm kernel expeller. See responsible procurement on page £.

ˆ Figures for Australia and China have also been re-calculated to make use AR§ GWP factors.

£ Interim Climate Change Committee (). Action on Agricultural Emissions (p„).

§ Owl Farm is a demonstration farm and DairyNZ climate change partnership farm.

Healthy Environment

HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT

“…FONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT  “†FONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 

BACK TO CONTENTS

Good progress.
Some progress or slight delay. O— track.

FY performance:

Climate targets

IndicatorTarget Performance

(cumulative change)

Commentary

FY ’FY •FY ƒ

Reduction in manufacturing

energy intensity (energy per

tonne of production)

ƒ„› reduction by

ƒ„ƒ„ from FY„˜

baseline (NZ)

…š.“›

reduction

…†.˜›

reduction

…†.”›

reduction

There was a further improvement

in FY and we remain on track

to deliver this target.

Reduction in absolute

manufacturing emissions

…

˜„› reduction by

ƒ„˜„ from FY…”

baseline (Global)

–.’›

reduction

ƒ.”›

reduction

˜.”›

reduction

We have reduced absolute emissions

by ‡. £ from baseline and our overall

manufacturing emissions intensity

improved slightly compared to FY¥.

We have a roadmap to deliver the

target and capital investment will

be staged.

Net change in GHG

emissions from dairy farming

since …–±…” (NZ)

(Pre-farm gate tCO

ƒ

-e)

ƒ

Neutral to ƒ„˜„

˜†š,„„„

reduction

on ¦ž 

…,…š–,„„„

reduction

on ¦ž 

“’–,„„„

reduction

on ¦ž 

Our estimated absolute GHG

emissions continues to be well

below the baseline season.

There was an increase compared

to FY¥ due to increased milk

production without improved

emissions intensity. Underlying

emissions intensity on farm is

.£ higher than ¦ž  baseline

(.£ higher excluding land use

change component).

 We have recalculated our baseline and performance to exclude the businesses we divested of during FY so the underlying trend can be determined (without this FY was ˆ.… reduction

on baseline). FY manufacturing emissions were also updated to re¦ect nalisation of FY actual data including electricity grid emission factor and coal emission factor.

 Baseline and prior reporting years have been recalculated for this report to make use of IPCC Assessment Report § global warming potential factors.

ˆ Equivalent number of cars calculated using factor from New Zealand Energy E«ciency and Conservation Authority (EECA).

CASE STUDY

Using wood biomass

As we transition our manufacturing operations to

alternative low-emissions fuel sources, we must maintain

a secure supply of energy. It takes a lot of energy to run

our manufacturing sites, particularly those that turn the

highly-perishable milk into long-lasting nutritious powders.

At the peak of the season in New Zealand our sites are

processing over ª‚ million litres of milk per day. Without

continuously available energy, we risk wasting valuable

nutrition and impacting the environment by disposing of it.

In New Zealand, wood biomass is a by-product of forest

harvesting and processing, making it a good low-carbon

alternative to coal. However, it needs to be available close

to our manufacturing sites to avoid the GHG emissions

from transportation and it needs to be available in large

volumes on a reliable and cost-eˆective basis.

We chose Brightwater, one of our smaller sites, as our

prototype. We converted the boiler so it can co-’re wood

biomass with coal. Taking a co-’ring approach for our ’rst

biomass site ensured we had resilience in case we had any

problems with supply or operational performance. It went

live in November •‚†ª, reducing GHG emissions by about

€ª‚ tonnes CO

•

-e during FY†¤ and it is estimated it will save

about •,€‚‚ tonnes CO

•

-e per year.

Building on the lessons learned at Brightwater, this year

we also completed a successful trial at Te Awamutu. We

temporarily ran the coal boiler exclusively on wood pellets

and tested it under diˆerent conditions for three days.

While it highlighted some practical issues which would need

to be managed, we are now working to ensure security and

quality of the wood pellet supply on a cost-eˆective basis.

If full conversion proceeds, it is estimated the site could

reduce carbon emissions by around ª€,‚‚‚ tonnes per year,

equivalent to taking more than «•,‚‚‚

«

cars oˆ the road.

• We will deliver farm-speci’c GHG reporting to all farmers

in New Zealand.

• We will continue to invest in research and development

to investigate breakthrough mitigation technologies for

animal emissions.

• We will continue to progress our energy e ciency

improvements at manufacturing sites.

• We will continue our transition to low-carbon energy

sources at manufacturing sites.

WHATʼS NEXT

Climate

change CONTINUED

Our Performance

Healthy Environment

“’FONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 

HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT

““FONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 

BACK TO CONTENTS

New Zealand GHG emissions
Coal



PROCESS HEAT

Liquid fossil fuels



TRANSPORT

Eg: Packing



NON-ENERGY

Electricity



SITE POWER

Purchased Steam



PROCESS HEAT

Natural Gas



PROCESS HEAT

Enteric methane

Methane





Methane created in the digestive

processes of rumen.

Dung and Urine



Methane released from dung and

e

uent on pasture.

Excreta

Nitrous Oxide




Nitrous oxide caused by dung

and urine on pasture.

Nitrogen fertiliser



Nitrous oxide caused by

Nitrogen fertiliser.

Crop Residues



Emission from material left

on pasture.

Euent



Nitrous oxide from e

uent captured in

the farm’s e

uent management system.

Carbon Dioxide


 ­

Nitrogen Fertiliser

Carbon dioxide from Nitrogen

fertiliser production.



Electricity

Carbon dioxide from farm energy use.



Other Fertilisers

Carbon dioxide from the production

of fertilisers such as lime.



Fuel

Carbon dioxide from farm

vehicle emissions.

Greenhouse Gases:

Emissions on farm are created from the natural

digestion processes of dairy cattle, and are also

caused by the use of farm inputs such as fertilisers.

Reducing the emissions footprint of milk production

requires maximising the percentage of farm dry

matter used for milk production while minimising

the use of other farm inputs.

For detailed information on the scope, methodology and assumptions used in reporting these emissions, including corrections

to prior reporting, see www.fonterra.comEnvironmentalDataReportingNotes

Summing of individual numbers from breakdowns may not add up to the totals due to rounding.

Emissions from biofuels are not shown as protocol excludes them from the total. Biofuels emissions in FY were £,„ tCO



-e.

 To allow better comparison to other New Zealand reporting this excludes land use change and overseas feed components.

On-farm GHG emissions

by scope

(, tCO



-e)

Manufacturing GHG emissions

by source

(, tCO



-e)

Manufacturing GHG emissions

(, tCO



-e)

On-farm GHG emissions

(, tCO



-e)

Emissions footprint

For an average New Zealand Dairy Farm

…,šƒ„

…š,†ƒƒ

…–,’„–

(NZ inventory basis



)

„.š“ kg C„

ƒ

-e±kg FPCM

among the lowest for milk in the world

Total GHG emissions

by value chain segment

(, tCO



-e)









,

,

,

,

,

,





































Non-energy

(e.g. packing CO

,

refrigerants)

Purchased Steam

Electricity

Liquid Fossil Fuels

Natural Gas

Coal

FYFYFY

Total ,

Total ,

Total ,

,   

 

­ ,   

­,   

 ,   

,   



Distribution

Manufacturing

Farming

FY

Total ,





­,   

­„,   

­…,   

­†,   

­‡,   

 ,   

­,   

,   

 

Total , 

Total , 

Total ,









,





,

,

Scope ­

Scope

Scope ˆ

FY

reported

(­…‰­† season)

FY

reported

(­‰­„ season)

FY

reported

(­„‰­… season)

Farms we manage

Supplying Farms

}









,

,

,

,

,

,





































Non-energy

(e.g. packing CO

,

refrigerants)

Purchased Steam

Electricity

Liquid Fossil Fuels

Natural Gas

Coal

FYFYFY

Total ,

Total ,

Total ,

,   

 

­ ,   

­,   

 ,   

,   



Distribution

Manufacturing

Farming

FY

Total ,





­,   

­„,   

­…,   

­†,   

­‡,   

 ,   

­,   

,   

 

Total , 

Total , 

Total ,









,





,

,

Scope ­

Scope

Scope ˆ

FY

reported

(­…‰­† season)

FY

reported

(­‰­„ season)

FY

reported

(­„‰­… season)

Farms we manage

Supplying Farms

}

Global GHG emissions

Climate

change CONTINUED









,

,

,

,

,

,





































Non-energy

(e.g. packing CO

,

refrigerants)

Purchased Steam

Electricity

Liquid Fossil Fuels

Natural Gas

Coal

FYFYFY

Total ,

Total ,

Total ,

,   

 

­ ,   

­,   

 ,   

,   



Distribution

Manufacturing

Farming

FY

Total ,





­,   

­„,   

­…,   

­†,   

­‡,   

 ,   

­,   

,   

 

Total , 

Total , 

Total ,









,





,

,

Scope ­

Scope

Scope ˆ

FY

reported

(­…‰­† season)

FY

reported

(­‰­„ season)

FY

reported

(­„‰­… season)

Farms we manage

Supplying Farms

}

Healthy Environment

HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT

“ƒFONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT  “•FONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 

BACK TO CONTENTS

What we’ve been doing
Setting new targets

We aspire to play our part in achieving the concept of ‘zero waste’ and

this year we set specic global targets to guide our e­orts.

• £ recyclable, reusable or compostable by  .

• Zero solid waste to landll by  .

For Australia we had already committed to the Australian

Packaging Covenant, but this year we also joined the New Zealand

Plastic Packaging Declaration and the Chilean Plastics Pact.

In Australia, there is already an industry support tool available

to independently assess the recyclability of consumer packaging.

Using this tool we have determined that over £ of our

nished goods packaging designed for the Australian market

is considered recyclable.

For the rest of the world such tools do not exist so we are

undertaking a detailed assessment of the packaging materials we

use, how these are combined into nished goods and the typical

recycling infrastructure available in the main markets where we

sell these products. We also think it is important to track our

progress on packaging by the tonnes of nished goods packaging

sold because that better represents our impact on society.

Bulk ingredients products (e.g. pallets of  kg bags of powder) are

a large part of our product portfolio and, at this stage, we already

know that in most markets where we sell, several of our most used

packaging formats are readily recyclable:

• Paper and cardboard

• Metal cans and drums

• Wooden pallets.

We also know that we have a range of formats, used in lower

volumes, where the ability to recycle varies signicantly:

• Multi-layer mixed material cartons used for liquid products

(e.g. Tetrapak)

• Laminated and co-extruded lms (e.g. cheese bags)

• Foil-based lms and papers (e.g. powder sachets).

Led by our Fonterra Research and Development Centre, we have

established a programme to identify and evaluate alternative

sustainable packaging materials and solutions. The assessment is

considering a range of performance attributes including food safety.

Collaborating on waste reduction

To eliminate waste, it is important for businesses and other

organisations to work together. For example, waste streams from

some companies can become value streams for others; and the

combined waste from multiple organisations can reach a scale

that makes new innovations viable. To support this we host

an annual Recycling Forum to facilitate new relationships and

encourage innovation.

Working with Adhesifs, the supplier of labels for some of our large

volume products, we are now able to recycle the plastic backings

from the labels which were a large part of our waste to landll

from our Takanini site in New Zealand. The backings are turned

into tissue paper which is used in shirts and shoe boxes. The tissue

paper can thereafter be put in the normal recycling stream for

paper. This solution is currently overseas but it is a good approach

until we upgrade our labelling equipment in the future.

In FY¥, we completed trials in collaboration with a Kiwi start-up

called Future Post which turns waste plastic into fence posts for

use on farms. This year they won an innovation award at the

New Zealand Field Days and we retail the posts through our

Farm Source™ stores (see case study on page ).

Collaborating on packaging

We have worked with Oji Fibre Solutions in New Zealand to

design a bulk bin suitable for storing and transporting large

volumes of milk powder. Historically we have imported these

bins from an overseas provider, but working with Oji Fibre

Solutions we now have a locally sourced, food-grade solution

which is reusable multiple times and recyclable at the end of its

life. It is also collapsible and stackable, so it is e’cient to store

and transport when not in use. We are now working on a similar

design for liquid products.

In Australia, in collaboration with one of our customers, we have

changed from octo-bins to bulk bags for one specic powder

product, with an annual saving of ¢ tonnes of material.

We are also working with vendors looking at options for changing

the packaging materials we use, including the inclusion of some

recycled plastic content (e.g. rPET). This needs careful evaluation

to validate the food safety aspects, and to assess the options to

make the approach circular and local.

Using less materials

When designing new packaging, we seek to reduce the amount of

materials to an optimal level. This not only reduces the materials

used and saves cost, it also means less materials to be recycled,

reused or disposed of after consumption. However, we must

ensure that packaging is robust enough to protect our products

and avoid wasted food.

In Australia, we eliminated a label from the back of a range of milk.

This only saves g per item but when you sell ¢¥ million per year

that corresponds to ¢¥ tonnes less material per year.

We have also eliminated the foil layer from the outer layer of a

number of products. By eliminating this foil layer, which has been

used to provide colourful information to the consumer, we not

only reduce the quantity of materials used, it generally makes the

underlying packaging easier to recycle too.

Supporting our farmers

In New Zealand, as part of developing a Farm Environment Plan,

our Sustainable Dairy Advisors assess on-farm waste management

with our farmers and assign actions towards best practice.

Our Farm Source™ store network supports industry initiatives

such as the plastic container and waste chemical recovery services

provided by AgRecovery by acting as a drop-o­ location, and

plastic wrap recycling via Plasback, where farmers can order a

collection though our stores.

This year we also sponsored Trish Rankin's study investigating

rural waste practices by New Zealand dairy farmers.

Supporting food banks

Around the world, we support a number of food bank initiatives.

This helps us reduce food waste and provides good nutrition for

those who need it most. In New Zealand, we donated more than

¥ tonnes of food to a number of charities including the Salvation

Army, the Auckland City Mission and Kiwi Harvest. In Australia,

we continued to support Foodbank, Australia’s largest hunger

relief organisation, donating over ¢¦, meals and ¥¥,

Foodbank serves of fresh milk in ¥. In the USA our team

volunteered time to help the charity Feed My Starving Children

by packing boxes of nutritional meals that are sent to malnourished

children around the world. Our team packed  boxes of food

which is enough to provide over ¤, meals for children or

feed ¢ children – for a year. In Chile, we continued to support

Red Alimentos.

Packaging is vital for delivering safe

and quality nutrition, and is also a large

component of our direct and indirect waste.

As we refreshed our materiality assessment this year we explicitly

analysed waste arising from our direct operations separately

from the indirect waste that arises from our packaging after use.

Our assessment concluded that these two topics are of very

similar importance. Furthermore, addressing the recyclability

of our packaging will help reduce both our own solid waste

to landll and that which occurs post consumption.

The majority of our nished goods are ingredients for use

by business customers; but we also produce packaged goods

for foodservice and consumers.

This section covers the packaging used for all nished goods

manufactured at the sites we manage and at third-party

manufacturing sites who make nished goods for us. It also

covers the solid waste related to all sites that we manage,

including manufacturing sites, o’ces, retail stores and farms.

Our approach

We want to maximise the nutritional value delivered from every

drop of milk by minimising food loss across our supply chain,

from the farm to the consumer. This not only helps us deliver the

maximum return to our farmers, it also delivers better outcomes

for people and the environment.

Through our Group Environment Policy and supporting standards,

we require all our sites to: manage hazardous substances

responsibly; reduce waste, including packaging; maximise

manufacturing yield and support local waste solutions. Backing

this, we have packaging design guidelines and a cross-functional

group of experts to set direction and support progress.

Our aim is to deliver products right-rst-time and capture by-

products that were previously considered waste, such as whey,

to make them into new valuable products. You can call this

minimising waste or maximising yield. We regularly monitor

this and a specialist centralised team provides support to

manufacturing sites where the performance is falling behind

the best.

Packaging

and waste

Healthy Environment

HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT

’ FONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT  ’—FONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 

BACK TO CONTENTS

Our targets
IndicatorTarget PerformanceCommentary

FY ’FY •FY ƒ

Solid waste sent to

landžll (tonnes)

(New Zealand )

ƒ„› reduction by

ƒ„ƒ„ from FY…”

baseline (NZ)

”,ƒ†”

š›


up on FY 

”,’’˜

…–›


up on FY 

–,“šš

ƒ›

…


down on FY 

During FY¢ we transitioned to a new waste provider and

this makes it di’cult to meaningfully compare against our

FY  baseline. However, we have made signicant progress

in FY, reducing solid waste to landll by ¢¥  tonnes,

equivalent to a ¦£ reduction since FY¥.

We are now focussing on our new global target.

Solid waste sent to

landžll (tonnes)

(Global)

Zero by ƒ„ƒ”

…”,……˜…’,…“–

ƒ


š›


increase

…”,†„…

….š›


decrease

This is a new global target set this year and we have

achieved a .¢£ reduction since FY¥. The ¢¥  tonne

reduction achieved by our New Zealand business (above)

was negated by increases in other countries around the

world, most signicantly in Chile.

• We will continue to reduce the quantities of materials we

use and increase yield by minimising waste across our full

value chain.

• We will continue to reduce the amount of solid waste we

send to land’ll from all our operational sites.

• We will continue to transition our ’nished goods into

packaging which is more readily recyclable.

WHATʼS NEXT

DEFINITION

Zero waste:

Is where products and processes are designed to minimise

resource use, seeking to conserve and recover resources rather

than burn or bury them, and in–uencing people to change their

lifestyle to better emulate natural cycles.

Our Performance

CASE STUDY

Australian Soft Plastics

In Australia we became a REDcycle Partner. REDcycle collect

soft plastics such as cheese wrappers from special bins

located in major supermarkets and send them to Victorian

manufacturer Replas, who see plastic as a resource that can

be turned into items such as the bench seat shown here.

Nitin, Essam, Eric and Jenny from our Australian packaging

team are passionate about recycling and using the Australian

assessment tool, they have determined that over ¤‚® of

our ’nished goods packaging designed for the Australian

market is now considered recyclable.

(L-R) Nitin Raichurkar, Essam Elkhishin, Eric Taing, Jenny Phillips

CASE STUDY

Future Post

In FY†ª, working together with Kiwi start-up Future Post,

we completed trials which turn waste plastic into fence

posts. This year Future Post won an innovation award at

the New Zealand Field Days.

Anchor milk bottles are sourced from our manufacturing

sites and our bottle back system. Each post is made up

of milk bottles and soft plastics. It takes approximately

•‚ª milk bottles to make a †.ªm post.

The posts are manufactured in New Zealand, available

through our Farm Source™ stores and, at the end of

their life, they can be recycled into a new post.

CASE STUDY

Waitoa site reducing solid waste

Already operating at low levels of solid waste, achieving

further reductions at sites like Waitoa needs everyone’s help.

Personal protection items, such as paper hats and beard

masks, are essential for food safety and these can only

be recycled if they are carefully separated. This means

collection points in changing rooms and all staˆ avoiding

contamination with non-recyclable items such as ear plugs.

The diˆerent plastic types used, and in some cases diˆerent

colours, must be kept separate to make it worthwhile recycling.

This means lots of bins and everyone placing the right stuˆ,

and only the right stuˆ, in each bin. Working together at site

can make a real diˆerence.

 Absolute gures re¦ect totals to landll for operations managed during the year.

Progress against baseline has been recalculated for all years to exclude divested

businesses so underlying trend can be viewed.

 FY has been restated to include ƒ§ˆ tonnes of building construction waste

omitted from last year’s reporting.

Packaging

and waste CONTINUED

Good progress.

Some progress or slight delay. O— track.

FY performance:

Healthy Environment

’€FONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 

HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT

’­FONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 

BACK TO CONTENTS

Cows are the heart of every dairy farm,
and their health and welfare is of

paramount importance to us.

We work with our farmers to meet globally recognised standards

as set by the World Organisation for Animal Health, and eliminate

practices that contravene the Five Freedoms.

This section covers animal health and welfare and biosecurity for

farms we manage and farms that supply us with raw milk around

the world.

Our approach

Our farmers are required to uphold high standards of animal

welfare and comply fully with the latest regulations and codes

of welfare. These requirements are set out in Fonterra’s Terms

of Supply, and are guided by our overarching Group Animal

Welfare and Biosecurity Policy and supporting standards.

We support our farmers to continuously improve animal health

and welfare outcomes. We work with industry bodies and

training organisations to ensure farmers have access to high-

quality information that sets out expected best practice, relevant

regulatory requirements and access to training where required.

We work with industry partners such as meat processors,

transportation companies and regulators to ensure best practice

controls are in place.

The development of strategy, policy and standards for the global

management of farm animal welfare is the responsibility of

Fonterra’s General Manager – Veterinary, Technical and Risk

Management. The management and implementation of Fonterra’s

animal welfare policies and strategies are undertaken at a local

level, supported by our centralised veterinary and risk team.

Globally, our International Milk Quality team assesses animal

welfare as part of its milk quality audits in all markets outside

of New Zealand where we source milk. This enables Fonterra

to identify any issues and recommend improvements to farmers.

Many markets also have local veterinary and milk quality support

teams to manage this work.

What we’ve been doing

Co-operative Di©erence and Cared for Cows

As part of the Co-operative Di­erence (see page ) farmers are

being encouraged to establish animal health plans with their vets

that go beyond compliance with law. The requirements for these

health plans have been developed in collaboration with dairy

cattle vets and include a set of metrics that must be collected

and reported on an annual basis.

Building on the existing data collection, farm assessment and

monitoring activities we already had in place, this year we started

collecting additional information related to animal health and

welfare, including details on mastitis occurrences and lameness.

This extra information is required to support our “Cared for Cows”

programme which launched in New Zealand in June ¥. By

having independent certication against this standard we will be

able to reinforce the good work done by our farmers.

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR)

The prudent use of antimicrobials, particularly those identied as

critically important for the treatment of human disease, will help

to ensure that antibiotics remain e­ective for disease treatment

in the future. Our policy is that, where antibiotics are to be used,

it must be for the treatment of known infections under veterinary

advice. Our milk testing regime includes specic testing for

inhibitory substances such as antibiotics and there are nancial

penalties for farmers associated with non-compliance.

In New Zealand, we are working with regulators and the wider

livestock sector to implement improvements for the management

of AMR. In Australia, the dairy industry is aligning with the

Australian Animal Sector National AMR Plan ¥ and taking a

whole-of-industry approach to best-practice management and

prevention of over-use.

Fonterra has representation on the New Zealand National Mastitis

Advisory Committee, and supports the New Zealand Veterinary

Association’s aspirational goal that “By ‡ New Zealand Inc.

will not need antibiotics for the maintenance of animal health

and wellness.”

Animal

health and

biosecurity

Supporting industry initiatives

A focus in New Zealand this year was winter grazing practices.

Intensive grazing during wet winter periods and the grazing

of fodder crops requires the adoption of good practices to

avoid negative impacts to animal health and welfare and the

environment. During FY we supported DairyNZ, other industry

groups, and both local and national government bodies to

promote the adoption of good practices and to prepare for

next winter.

In Australia the recent focus has been supporting the industry

e­orts to eliminate painful procedures. In ¥ž Fonterra

trialled the mandatory use, and auditing, of pain relief for

calf disbudding on ¦ farms. In June , we also introduced

proactive farm visits to assess animal condition and support

suppliers facing issues such as drought or feed gaps.

Responding to biosecurity incursion

Since July ¢, when Mycoplasma bovis (M. bovis) was detected

for the rst time in New Zealand, we have we have worked with

the Government, sector groups and other dairy companies to

minimise the implications to both animal and farmer welfare,

and support e­orts to eradicate the disease.

The M. bovis bacterium has signicant implications for disease

management, animal welfare and milk production, however, it

poses no risk to milk quality or food safety. Our Farm Source™

team and tanker operators have helped develop and coordinate

multiple rounds of special milk testing to help the government

track the incursion. We are also consulting with government and

supporting their review of the Biosecurity Act (‡).

As of ‡

rd

October , ,¤,¥¤¤ tests have identied 

properties as having M. bovis and with  ¦ of them dairy farms.

¥  of those properties have completed eradication procedures

and are now considered clear of the disease.

Our Perfomance

Somatic cell counts

Somatic cell count (SCC) is not only an indicator of milk quality,

a low SCC also gives an indication of good animal husbandry.

Farmers have delivered excellent results in this area this year, with

reductions in all regions except China which increased slightly

from its great result in FY¥.

The European Union importžexport standard of ¦, cellsžml

is a widely quoted standard and the results shown above indicate

we are signicantly less than this for nearly all countries and we

will continue to work towards lower counts.

Growth hormones

Due to animal welfare concerns, we do not support the use of

hormonal growth promoting substances (HGPs) or substances

stimulating increased milk production, such as rBST.

Neither of these substances are used by farmers in our supply

chain, except in Chile, where there continues to be some isolated

usage of rBST.

Lifespan

Cows in New Zealand have long and productive lives. The latest

available information indicates cows average ¦.  lactations

(¤.  – ¢ years) with a calving interval of ‡¢. days



. These measures

jointly re–ect high reproductive performance, which can only

be achieved under conditions of good animal management.

Genetically Modi§ed Animals

The use of cloned or genetically modied cows is not permitted

by any Fonterra supplier.

• We will continue to work with farmers, veterinarians

and regulators to support strong biosecurity and

promote good animal health and welfare practices.

• We will continue to encourage the adoption of

animal health plans as part of the Co-operative

Diˆerence framework.

• We will continue to stay abreast of international

developments to ensure we maintain leading

standards in the sphere of animal welfare.

WHATʼS NEXT

Somatic cell counts by location

ƒ„…†‡…ˆƒ„…ˆ‡…‰ƒ„…‰‡…Š

Average (mean)

„„„ cells±ml

Average (mean)

„„„ cells±ml

Average (mean)

„„„ cells±ml

New Zealand† ̄ ̄†ª‚†˜ª

Australia†ª˜† ̄ª† ̄†

China†˜ ̄†˜ª†ª«

Chile•˜‚«†¤«†•

BrazilNot available–««€˜ ̄

Sri Lanka˜ ̄˜˜«€–¤¤

Global weighted

average (by volume)

…“„…“–…š˜

 DairyNZ, New Zealand Dairy Statistics, ƒ-.

Healthy Environment

HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT

’…FONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT  ’†FONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 

BACK TO CONTENTS

We are working together to
deliver a sustainable business.

Through science and innovation we can

respond to people’s changing needs,

attitudes and lifestyles to deliver a strong

and stable payout to our farmers and a good

return on capital for our investors. It’s all

part of ensuring our Co-operative is here

for generations to come.

Nā tō rourou, nā taku rourou

ka ora ai te iwi.

With your contribution and my contribution,

we’ll all thrive together.

Healthy

Business

In this section:

80

Group overview

82

Our products

84

Employment and income creation

86

Creating value

Healthy Business

’’FONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT  ’“FONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 

BACK TO CONTENTS

Healthy
business

As a co-operative, our business is

about supporting our shareholder

farmers’ businesses.

That includes paying them the best price for their milk, providing

them with a sustainable income, supporting the health of their

businesses and the wellbeing of their families and employees.

The past few years have presented some challenges in our

performance, which has led to us resetting our strategy and

direction. This has refocused on our core role as a co-operative.

For Fonterra and our farmer shareholders a healthy business

means a strong, sustainable co-operative that creates goodness

for current generations and for generations to come. That means

Healthy People and a Healthy Environment too. But we cannot

make a di­erence to people and the environment if we don’t have

a strong, healthy business to provide a sustainable income and

provide a stable platform for investment in the future.

We believe we have some unique strengths as a large-scale

New Zealand co-operative that means we can lead the way in

sustainable dairy products making a positive di­erence to the

health of people and the environment. Making the most of this

opportunity is the key to the long-term health of our business.

How Fonterra is making this happen:

We are working together to deliver a sustainable business.

To do this we will:

Support healthy, sustainable livelihoods for our farmers

by returning the most value from every drop of milk

Build a strong co-operative by ensuring our business,

including investments, delivers long-term value

Meet the changing needs of customers and consumers

by leveraging our unique strengths and innovating to create

sustainable value for them and us.

• Farmer payments: ¬†‚ billion paid to New Zealand

farmers for •‚†ª ̈†¤ season and ¬† billion

paid farmers for milk sourced in other countries

– see page 

• Return on capital: Our return on capital is –.ª®, down

from ˜.«® but we reduced capital spend by «‚® to

¬˜‚‚ million – see page 

• Fixed milk price: We introduced our ªth ’nancial tool

for farmers. The ’xed milk price tool helps farmers

reduce some of the risk arising from global milk price

volatility – see page 

• Reduced electricity bills: Working with Genesis

Energy in New Zealand we launched a new electricity

plan which can save farmers up to •–® oˆ their milk

shed electricity bill – see page 

KEY POINTS FROM FY‹Œ

Fonterra’s contribution to the SDGs

from a healthy business perspective.

Create positive employment

opportunities along our value

chain ( . )

Lift dairy productivity to meet

growing nutritional needs (‚.)

Provide positive and inclusive

employment for all groups (‚.)

Healthy Business

’ƒFONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 

HEALTHY BUSINESS

’•FONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 

BACK TO CONTENTS

For our full nancial results, please refer to our Annual Report:
www.fonterra.comannualreport

New Zealand Ingredients and our

Foodservice business improved on last

year but were offset by challenges in some

markets, and significant impairments

and one-off items, resulting in a net loss.

Cash –ow improved signicantly and solid progress was made on

reducing expenditure and decreasing debt.

The performance of the largest part of our business, New Zealand

Ingredients, improved on last year with increased sales and lower

operating expenses contributing to higher normalised earnings

before interest and tax (EBIT). Our global Foodservice business

also improved on last year with normalised gross margin up £.

This was despite lower sales volumes, following a slow start to

butter sales in Greater China and Asia. Key areas of challenge

in the business included Australia Ingredients, the ingredients

and consumer businesses in Latin America and the consumer

businesses in Sri Lanka, Hong Kong and New Zealand. These

challenges were the main reasons our normalised gross margin

was down §‡¢ million, or ¦£, on the previous year, but were

largely o­set by normalised operating expenses decreasing by

§¥  million. ‘Other income’ declined due to lower one-o­ gains

than the previous year, and as a result our normalised EBIT

declined £ to §¥ million, from § million the previous year.

There were also some signicant one-o­ items. These totalled §¥

million before tax, and increasing to §¥¥  million after tax. Of this

amount, §  million was attributable to non-controlling interests

and the net amount attributable to equity holders is §¥¤ million.

This included impairing the carrying values of some assets and

other one-o­ accounting adjustments, the most signicant being

DPA Brazil, our Venezuelan consumer business, China Farms and

our New Zealand consumer business. While they do not impact

the day to day operations of the business, they are reported in

the Income Statement and as a result we have reported a Net

Loss After Tax of §¤  million. After adjusting for non-controlling

interests, this represented ‡  cents per share. Our continued focus

on nancial discipline has resulted in a reduction in normalised

operating expenses of §¥  million, or ¢£, and capital expenditure

reducing by §¤ million to §¤ million. Combined with improved

trade working capital and divestments, our free cash –ow improved

signicantly and debt reduced by §¦¤ million. While good progress

has been made on improving cash –ow and reducing debt, given the

disappointing earnings and signicant one-o­ items we decided not

to pay a dividend this year.

Group

overview

 Percentages as shown in tables may not align to the calculation based on numbers

in the tables due to rounding.

 Refer to note  of the Notes to the Financial Statements.

ˆ Includes other operating income, net foreign exchange gain(loss) and share of equity

accounted investees.

£ Debt payback ratio is economic net interest bearing debt divided by earnings before

interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation (known as DebtEBITDA). Both Debt and

EBITDA are adjusted, from reported amounts, for the impact of operating leases, certain

normalisations and non-cash amounts.

§ Gearing ratio is economic net interest bearing debt divided by total capital. Total capital

is equity excluding the hedge reserves, plus economic net interest bearing debt.

„ Return on capital is calculated as normalised EBIT, less a notional tax charge divided

by capital employed including brands, goodwill and equity-accounted investments.

Return on capital, excluding brands, goodwill and equity-accounted investments was

ƒ.„… (ˆ July : .…).

ƒ Includes asset divestments.

FOR THE YEAR ENDED

NZD MILLION‹… JULY ƒ„…Š‹… JULY ƒ„…‰CHANGE

…

Volume (’„„„ MT),‹ž ,‹‚ž‘ƒ

Sales revenue‚‘,‹‹‚‘,ž—(‚)ƒ

Normalised gross margin

ƒ

ž,‘‹”ž,‹”‚()ƒ

Normalised gross margin

percentage

‹”.‘ƒ‹”.ƒ–

Other income and other

˜

‹‹”‚¡(”ž)ƒ

Reported operating expenses¤‚, ‘”¥¤ž,‘ ’¥¡ƒ

Normalised operating

expenses

ƒ

¤‚,ž‹‹¥¤‚, ¡¥’ƒ

Reported EBIT¤‹‘¥‚¡‚(‹‘)ƒ

Normalised EBIT

ƒ

—‹ ‘‚( )ƒ

Net žnance costs¤‹—¥¤‹¡¥ (‹)ƒ

Reported tax expense¤‹’’¥¤‚¥(ž‚‹)ƒ

Net loss after tax¤¡‘”¥¤‹ ¡¥(‚‹‘)ƒ

Reported earnings

per share (cents)

¤‘.ž”¥¤‘.‹¥(‹”ž)ƒ

Normalised earnings

per share

ƒ

(cents)

‘.‹’‘.‚(‚ )ƒ

Dividend per share (cents)¦‹‘–

Adjusted debt to

EBITDA

–

(ratio)

.žx.”x

Gearing ratio

”

—.‚ƒ—.ƒ

Return on capital

’

”.—ƒ¡.žƒ

Free cash ³ow

š

‹,‘ ”¡‘‘—žƒ

Capital expenditure¤¡‘‘¥¤—¡‹¥ž‘ƒ

EUROPE

—“”…m

REVENUE

…

MANUFACTURING

SITE

END FY…“

¬˜ª†m Revenue

† Manufacturing site

REST OF ASIA

—”.”†b

REVENUE

–

MANUFACTURING

SITES

END FY…“

¬–.˜ªb Revenue

€ Manufacturing sites

AUSTRALIA

—….š“b

REVENUE

š

MANUFACTURING

SITES

END FY…“

¬†.ª€b Revenue

̄ Manufacturing sites

NEW ZEALAND

—ƒ.…“b

REVENUE

Ġ

MANUFACTURING

SITES

END FY…“

¬•.‚ªb Revenue

«‚ Manufacturing sites

CHINA

—–.ƒ†b

REVENUE

END FY…“

¬«.¤ªb Revenue

UNITED STATES

—†˜…m

REVENUE

END FY…“

¬ ̄¤«m Revenue

REST OF WORLD

—ƒ.˜’b

REVENUE

ƒ

MANUFACTURING

SITES

END FY…“

¬«.†•b Revenue

• Manufacturing sites

LATIN AMERICA

¢CHILE, BRAZIL£

—ƒ.…˜b

REVENUE

”

MANUFACTURING

SITES

END FY…“

¬•.• ̄b Revenue

̄ Manufacturing sites

Healthy Business

• FONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 

HEALTHY BUSINESS

•—FONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 

BACK TO CONTENTS

Global ingredients
Our range of dairy ingredients are sold under our NZMP™ brand in

more than ‡ countries worldwide and can be found at the heart

of some of the world’s most famous food and nutrition brands.

We o­er one of the broadest ranges of ingredients in the dairy

industry, providing hundreds of solutions to meet the needs of

customers every day. Backed by Fonterra’s New Zealand grass-fed

farming heritage, world-class processing, leading quality standards

and our passion for innovation, our NZMP ingredients are trusted

for their high performance and exceptional quality.

Our range includes powders, proteins, butter, creams and dairy

fats, cheeses and other speciality ingredients that support

applications such as sports and lifestyle nutrition, infant nutrition,

medical nutrition and healthy ageing, beverages, yoghurts and

cultured products.

Foodservice

Foodservice is one of the largest industries in the world and

encompasses food and beverages that are consumed out of

the home such as in restaurants, cafés and bakeries. Under our

Anchor™ Food Professionals brand we create high quality, t-for-

purpose products and solutions for foodservice professionals in

over   countries.

We understand dairy and the role that it can play in delivering great

taste, texture and appearance in the signature dishes and o­erings

that our customers serve to millions of consumers every day.

As well as providing ingredients we provide services through our

Anchor Food Professionals, who work alongside our customers,

in their businesses, sharing new ideas and ways of doing things.

We work with our customers to improve their products and to

grow their business including solutions that improve productivity,

increase yield, reduce wastage and enhance taste.

Consumer

We also manufacture, market and distribute our own consumer

products. These products include branded dairy products sold

direct to consumers, such as milk, milk powders, yoghurt, butter

and cheese. Our three global brands are Anchor™, Anlene™

and Anmum™.

Our

products

CONSUMER

ƒ„–

Volume ('——— tonnes)

—…,ƒš’m

Revenue

—˜”†m

Normalised gross margin

FOODSERVICE

†˜

Volume ('——— tonnes)

—”“’m

Revenue

—†˜m

Normalised gross margin

ASIA

CONSUMER

”ƒ–

Volume ('——— tonnes)

—…,’–…m

Revenue

—˜ƒ–m

Normalised gross margin

FOODSERVICE

…„–

Volume ('——— tonnes)

—”…“m

Revenue

—†“m

Normalised gross margin

OCEANIA

CONSUMER

”ƒš

Volume ('——— tonnes)

—…,˜’–m

Revenue

—˜’šm

Normalised gross margin

FOODSERVICE

˜ƒ

Volume ('——— tonnes)

—…–˜m

Revenue

—˜˜m

Normalised gross margin

LATIN AMERICA

CONSUMER

š’

Volume ('——— tonnes)

—˜’…m

Revenue

—…–”m

Normalised gross margin

FOODSERVICE

ƒƒ˜

Volume ('——— tonnes)

—…,…ƒƒm

Revenue

—ƒ„˜m

Normalised gross margin

GREATER CHINA

Ingredients

MillionFY…‰FY…Š‘’

…

Revenue (—)†˜,«‚˜† ̄,‚«–€®

Normalised gross margin (—)†,€ ̄•†,€• ̄(«®)

Normalised gross margin

…

(›)¤.‚®ª.€®

Foodservice

MillionFY…‰FY…Š‘’

…

Revenue (—)•,€ ̄¤•,«˜¤(€®)

Normalised gross margin (—)«ªª€•˜†‚®

Normalised gross margin

…

(›)†–. ̄®†ª.‚®

Consumer

MillionFY…‰FY…Š‘’

…

Revenue (—)€,˜€«€,˜€•‚®

Normalised gross margin (—)†,•¤–†,†¤–(ª®)

Normalised gross margin

…

(›)• ̄.¤®•–. ̄®

 Percentages as shown in table may not align to the calculation of percentages

based on numbers in the table due to rounding of reported gures.

OUR BRANDS

Healthy Business

•€FONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 

HEALTHY BUSINESS

•­FONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 

BACK TO CONTENTS

Our Co-operative supports the livelihoods
of many thousands of people.

At the heart of our Co-op are our farmer shareholders, who rely

on Fonterra to use their capital wisely to create a sustainable

return from their milk. By supporting the success of their farming

businesses, the people they employ and the vendors they rely on,

we contribute signicantly to regional economic development.

We also support the livelihoods of our employees. On a full-time

equivalent basis, Fonterra directly employs ,¤¥  people

(see Our People on page  for more information on the

makeup of our global workforce).

In New Zealand, industry-wide gures



show that the dairy sector

accounts for £ of total exports (goods and services). The sector

employs ‡¥,¢ people directly – ¤,  on farm and ,

in dairy processing, with thousands of others employed in jobs

supporting the local industry.

Our approach

Creating a sustainable income from the land is the founding

purpose of a farmer-owned Co-operative. Through our Co-operative

structure we maintain farmer ownership and control over collection,

processing, marketing and distribution, with the aim of delivering

healthy, sustainable returns. In the past year, ¢£ of our milk was

produced by farming families running a single farm.

Maintaining a strong national dairy Co-operative supports all dairy

farmers by setting a Farmgate Milk Price. New Zealand is unique

in that  £ of milk production is exported and Fonterra collects

a large proportion of the milk. As a result, there is no ‘market price’

set through competition for supply.

We calculate a Farmgate Milk Price using an independently

approved methodology¾. This enables total returns to be

allocated between payments for milk and returns on the

share capital invested by farmer shareholders and unit holders

in the Co-operative.

Unlike some agricultural products, milk production provides a

regular income. Fonterra pays its farmers monthly for the milk

collected. In New Zealand, the price paid is based on an advanced

rate determined by the projected Farmgate Milk Price for the

season. This advanced rate is adjusted during the season and any

shortfall in payment against a higher nal milk price is paid at the

end of the season.

For our direct workforce, we take a ‘total remuneration’ approach

for our salaried employees which means we generally aim to pay

at the median rate in the markets in which we operate. For roles

that are deemed critical or that have a signicant impact on

business performance we may choose to benchmark at the

upper quartile rate.

Many of our waged employees are covered by collective

agreements. New Zealand industry data



shows that the average

dairy processing wage of §¥ , , is well above all other forms

of food product manufacturing.

What we’ve been doing

Fixed Milk Price

This year we introduced Fixed Milk Price. It’s our eighth nancial

tool for farmers and o­ers ten opportunities a season to x a price

for up to  £ of their estimated milk supply.

This helps farmers reduce some of the risk from global milk price

volatility and gives them more condence in making business

decisions as they know that some of their xed costs are covered.

We can also provide customers with longer contracts at a

guaranteed price. Customers value this certainty and it can

bring additional value back to our Co-operative.

Helping to lower farm operating costs through Farm Source

Through our Farm Source™ stores, we provide seasonal deals

and o­er eligible farmers benets such as -day interest free

purchases and the ability to earn Farm Source Reward Dollars.

In FY, farmers received §¦.¥m in Farm Source Reward Dollars,

store discounts on everyday farming supplies and partnership

deals. From June , eligible farmers can also spread payments

or defer them for six months on all Farm Source store purchases

over § .

We also maximise our collective scale to deliver competitive

prices. In a rst for New Zealand, Genesis Energy has launched

a new electricity plan for Dairy. It’s o­ered exclusively by Farm

Source and can save farmers between   and  £ o­ their milking

shed electricity bill.

If the average-sized Co-operative farm purchased all their

farm supplies from Farm Source, they would get approximately

 cents per kgMS in savings and rewards.

Our Performance

Detailed commentary on our nancial performance is included

in our detailed Annual Report,

www.fonterra.com‰annualreport Š‹

This year, our employee numbers fell by ,¤¢‡. This gure is

global full-time equivalent employees, including permanent

and xed-term. Much of this fall is attributed to our divestment

of businesses such as Tip Top, meaning the people employed by

these businesses are no longer counted in our reporting.

Employment

and income

creation

Economic value distributedFY •FY ƒ

Payment to suppliers (farmers) for NZ-sourced milk˜‹Ž,‹‹• million˜Œ,–—‘ million

New Zealand Farmgate Milk Price ˜’.’Œ per kgMS˜’.“• per kgMS

Payment to suppliers (farmers) for non-NZ sourced milk˜‹,”—• million ˜Œ’’ million

Prožt after tax attributable to shareholders˜””‹ million loss

(earnings of -§‘.‹ per share)

˜••– million loss

(earnings of -§‘.ž” per share)

Dividend payment to equity holders of the Co-operative˜‹’‹ million

(dividend of §‘.‹‘ per share)

˜Ž

(No dividend paid)

Employees (FTE)””,“•‘ ”Ž,’‘•

Our targets

IndicatorTarget

‹

FY ’FY •FY ƒCommentary

Return on capital

–

“.”› by end FYƒƒ

…„› by end FYƒ–

“.˜›’.˜›”.“›

Reduction re–ects a decline in normalised earnings

(EBIT) due to challenges in the ingredients businesses

in Australia and Latin America, and the consumer

businesses in New Zealand, Sri Lanka, Hong Kong and

Latin America. The capital base remained largely stable.

Earnings per share

(cents per share)

–„c by end FYƒƒ

”„c by end FYƒ–

–†cƒ–c…šc

Reduction due to the decline in normalised earnings

(EBIT) compared to prior year (see commentary above).

Free cash ³ow

”

—†„„m by end FYƒƒ

—…,„”„m by end FYƒ–

—’š„m—’„„m

—’††m

Financial discipline resulted in lower operating

expenditure, reduced capital expenditure, improved

cash –ow and lower debt.

Debt±EBITDA

’

ƒ.”-˜.”x by end FYƒƒ

˜.”x–.”x

–.˜x

A decline in normalised earnings (EBIT) due to

challenges listed above was o­set by decreased debt.

• We will build a great team by successfully shifting to

a new customer-led operating model, where we live

our purpose and values through our actions and with a

culture that empowers our people.

• We will continue to support regional New Zealand by

injecting ¬†‚ billion into rural communities by paying a

competitive milk price to farmers.

• We will continue to work on our three-point plan,

with ’nancial targets for FY•‚ of:

– Debt no more than «. ̄–x earnings;

– Capital expenditure no more than ¬–‚‚ million;

– Gross margin more than ¬« billion;

– Earnings guidance †–-•– cents per share.

WHATʼS NEXT

 Source: How does the dairy sector share its growth. NZIER report to DCANZ October . Data from ƒ.

 More information on the Farmgate Milk Price calculation and Milk Price Statements is available on the Fonterra website.

ˆ There can be no certainty of outcome in relation to the matters to which these plans or forward-looking statements relate. They involve risks, uncertainties, assumptions and

other important factors (some of which may be out of Fonterra’s control) that could cause the actual outcomes to be materially di—erent from the results expressed or implied.

No assurance or guarantee is given as to the likelihood of fullment of any such statement or projection.

£ Based on normalised earnings, and capital employed includes brands, goodwill, and equity accounted investments.

§ For comparative purposes divestments proceeds have been excluded from cash ¦ow.

„ Debt payback ratio is economic net interest bearing debt divided by earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation. Both Debt and EBITDA are adjusted,

from reported amounts, for the impact of operating leases, certain normalisations and non-cash amounts.

Healthy Business

HEALTHY BUSINESS

•…FONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT  •†FONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 

BACK TO CONTENTS

Creating value
Outcomes - Our value creationInputs - Our dependencies

Social capital

We export to over ‹ž‘ countries and we are working to encourage

international trade and increase common understanding through

stakeholder engagement.

We partner with others to achieve positive social impact at scale through

programmes such as Fonterra Milk for Schools, KickStart Breakfast, Living

Water, Sustainable Catchments and Fonterra Grass Roots Fund.

Social capital

We rely on the social capital of our Co-operative as nearly ,

New Zealand farmer shareholders working together.

We rely on positive relationships with governments to enable trade and

collaboration with others, to e¢ciently and e•ectively deliver nutritional

products to the world.

Intellectual capital

Our people, processes and systems mean:

• …† of our manufacturing sites are certi‡ed to leading food safety standards

• …ˆ† of our products can be electronically traced back to milk supply

• Š new patents granted this year.

• ‹ journal articles published this year.

We are working to deliver further innovations such as farming practices,

methane reduction, improved nutrition and e¢cient manufacturing.

Intellectual capital

We rely on the know-how, systems and intellectual property that more

than Œ years of dairying experience in New Zealand and more than

‘ years of investment in research and development has generated.

•  PhDs work at our research centre

• Ž‘ families of patents held in force.

Financial capital

We create †nancial value for our investors and farmers by generating

demand for their milk in higher-value products (down ‹ƒ to ¡ƒ in FY‹ ).

• Return on capital was Ž.”†

• •…,ŒŠ” million paid to farmers for New Zealand-sourced milk

• • million paid as dividend.

We are working to deliver a respectable return on capital and a strong

payout to our farmers.

Financial capital

We rely on a strong †nancial base to operate and invest in infrastructure

for the future.

We employed capital of •…,‹‹” million from our farmer shareholders,

unit holders and from debt during FY‹ .

Physical capital

We manufactured Š million tonnes of ‡nished goods and commissioned

new infrastructure including:

• A new cheese plant in New Zealand

We are upgrading our assets to be more resource-e¢cient, lower our

environmental footprint and meet the changing demands of our customers.

Physical capital

We rely on the property, plant and equipment that allow us to collect

milk, and make and distribute our products to the world.

With a total net book value of §¡,”‹‚ million at the end of FY‹

this included:

• Ž‘ milk collection tankers

• Š” manufacturing sites.

Human capital

We are working to improve health and wellbeing through the products

and services we deliver. We provide a workplace that delivers:

• A safe environment (TRIFR ª . per million hrs)

• High sta• engagement (MySay ª .‘’)

• Good development opportunities.

We are working to increase our positive impact by developing a diverse

and inclusive workforce and providing support services to our farmers.

Human capital

Over , talented employees directly contribute around the world.

Over ˆ, farmers and farm workers use their skills to provide

us with milk.

And thousands of people in our supply chain are vital to the provision

of the goods and services we procure.

Natural capital

Our supplying farms emit .Ž million tonnes of CO



-e and can impact

local water quality. We are working with our farmers to achieve a healthy

environment for farming and for society.

Our manufacturing sites emit . million tonnes of CO



-e and discharge

‹ million cubic metres of water, which can impact local water quality.

We are investing to improve resource e¢ciency, transition to renewable

energy and achieve leading standards of wastewater treatment.

Natural capital

Our farmers and their Š.ˆ million milking cows rely on .‹ million

hectares of pastoral land where rain, sunlight and soil grows natural

grass. Some additional inputs include fertiliser, irrigated water and

animal nutrition.

Manufacturing processes farmers' milk, combining it with other ingredients

and materials to make our products. This includes …PJ of energy and

Žˆ million cubic metres of fresh water.

and to consumers.

ENTRY

to make and distributenutrition around the world

and to consumers.as ingredients, for foodservice

from farmers We source raw milk

Healthy Business

HEALTHY BUSINESS

•’FONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT  •“FONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 

BACK TO CONTENTS

Sustainable Development GoalsOur contributionIndicatorOn-FarmManufacturingConsumption
End poverty in all its

forms everywhere

Create positive employment opportunities along our value chain†.•

End hunger, achieve food security

and improved nutrition and promote

sustainable agriculture

Provide access to safe, aˆordable nutrition •.†

Address malnutrition through products tailored to speci’c health needs•.•

Share our dairy expertise with small-scale producers •.«

Lift dairy productivity to meet growing nutritional needs•.€

Ensure healthy lives and promote

well-being for all at all ages

Responsibly provide products to support wellbeing of mothers and infants

«.†

«.•

Continue to improve the nutritional pro’le of our products«.€

Promote healthy and informed consumer choices«.€

Achieve gender equality and

empower all women and girls

Ensure equal participation and opportunities for women in the workforce –.–

Share our dairy expertise with female small-scale producers –.–

Ensure access to sanitation and

water for all

Reduce the impact of farming and manufacturing on water

quality and ecosystems

˜.«

†€.†

†–.†

†–.•

Conserve and sustainably use the

oceans, seas and marine resources

Increase water e ciency in areas of constrained supply ˜.€

Sustainably manage forests, combat

deserti§cation, halt and reverse land

degradation and halt biodiversity loss

Protect and restore freshwater ecosystems ˜.˜

Promote inclusive and sustainable

economic growth, employment and

decent work for all

Provide positive and inclusive employment for all groups ª.–

Address labour and human rights issues in our supply chain

ª. ̄

ª.ª

Provide a safe and secure working environment ª.ª

Ensure sustainable consumption

and production patterns

Manage and use natural resources e ciently †•.•

Reduce food waste throughout our supply chain †•.«

Reduce waste generation through our operations and product packaging †•.–

Take urgent action to combat

climate change and its impacts

Support farmers to build resilience to climate change †«.†

Reduce emissions across our supply chain

Our contribution

to United Nations

Sustainable

Development

Goals

Fonterra supports the United Nations Sustainable Development

Goals (SDGs) and we are committed to playing our part, by

working collaboratively to deliver change at scale.

The Dairy Declaration of Rotterdam



, recognises the SDGs as the

overarching framework for achieving sustainable development to

‡ and the critical contribution the dairy sector will play.

We understand that the SDGs and their underlying targets can

help us rene our sustainability approach, not only to reduce

risks, but also to identify opportunities for growth that contribute

positively to their achievement.

We have analysed our business activities, material issues and value

chain against the SDGs and their underlying ¤ targets. Here we

identify the specic goals where we can make the most material

contribution, the objectives we have prioritised for specic

indicators and where this occurs in our value chain.

We are also implementing members of the Dairy Sustainability

Framework.

The dairy sector’s global approach to sustainable development is

represented by the Dairy Sustainability Framework (DSF). Fonterra is a

founding and implementing member of the DSF. We are committed

to addressing all  DSF criteria within our supply chain, through a

process of continuous improvement prioritised in conjunction with

our material topics. For more information, see:

www.dairysustainabilityframework.org

 A joint declaration of the UN Food and Agriculture Organization and the International

Dairy Federation signed in „.

•••ƒFONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT  FONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 

Appendices

APPENDICES

BACK TO CONTENTS

Global Reporting
Initiative Standards

REFTOPIC TITLE REFERENCE

GENERAL DISCLOSURES

 

Name of the organisationFonterra Co-operative Group Limited



Activities, brands, products, and servicesAbout Fonterra. See page . Our products. See page 



Location of headquartersSee page 



Location of operationsOur farming and manufacturing activities. See page 


Ownership and legal formAbout Fonterra. See page 

 

Markets servedOur Products. See page 

 

Scale of the organisationAbout Fonterra. See page 

 

Information on employees and other workersOur people. See page 



 

Supply chainCreating value. See page 

 

Signicant changes to the organisation and its supply chainWe divested of our Inlaca subsidiary in Venezuela

and our Tip Top ice cream business in New Zealand.

 

Precautionary principle or approachManaging operations. See page 

 

External initiativesAssociations, endorsements and memberships. See page 

 

Membership of associations Associations, endorsements and memberships. See page 

 

Statement from senior decision-makerLetter from the Board Chair and Chief Executive. See page 
 

Values, principles, standards, and norms of behaviour Our Values. See page . Details on our Code of Ethics are

published on page ˆ‰ of the Fonterra Annual Report ‹ŒŽ

 

Mechanisms for advice and concerns about ethicsThe Way We Work Hotline is described on page ˆ‰ of the

Fonterra Annual Report ‹ŒŽ

 

Governance structure A full list of Board Committees is published on page ˆˆ of the

Fonterra Annual Report ‹ŒŽ

 

Executive-level responsibility for economic, environmental,

and social topics

Accountability for sustainability in Governance and

Ethical Business

‹













List of stakeholder groups
Identifying and selecting stakeholders

Approach to stakeholder engagement

Key topics and concerns raised

Responding to what’s important. page 

Our stakeholders in Materiality assessment notes

‰





Collective bargaining agreementsEmployment Rights. See page 




Entities included in the consolidated nancial statements A list of entities is included on page ˆ” of Fonterra’s Annual

Financial Results ‹ŒŽ. The same entities apply to this

Sustainability Report, except where explicitly excluded.





Dening report content and topic boundaries Responding to whatʼs important. See page 

Global Reporting Initiative Standards. See page 





List of material topics Responding to whatʼs important. See page 





Restatements of informationRefer to Environmental Data Reporting Notes

–

for details





Changes in reporting No signi—cant changes other than improved data coverage

and quality

 

Reporting period About This Report. See page 

(Period is  August ‹Œš – ‰ July ‹ŒŽ)

 

Date of most recent report November ‹Œš for period  August ‹Œ” – ‰ July ‹Œš



Reporting cycleAbout This Report. See page  (Annual reporting cycle)



Contact point for questions regarding the report About this report. See page 

(Email: sustainability@fonterra.com)



Claims of reporting in accordance with the GRI StandardsGlobal Reporting Initiative Standards. See page 


GRI content indexGlobal Reporting Initiative Standards. See page 

 - 

External assurance Bureau Veritas Assurance Statement. See page 

ECONOMIC TOPIC DISCLOSURES

-

Direct economic value generated and distributedAbout Fonterra. See page . Employment and income creation.

See page

. Community. See page . Refer to Remuneration

on page

ˆŽ of Annual Report ‹ŒŽ

 -

Proportion of senior management hired from the local communityRefer to Hiring from Local Communities in Additional employee data



.

 -

Conrmed incidents of corruption and actions takenRefer to Anti-corruption in Governance and ethical business

‹

-

Legal actions for anti-competitive behaviour, anti-trust, and

monopoly practices

Legal compliance in Governance and ethical business

‹

ENVIRONMENTAL TOPIC DISCLOSURES

 -

Energy consumption within the organisationClimate change – Our performance. See page 



 -

Energy intensityClimate change – Our performance. See page 

 -

Reduction of energy consumptionClimate change. See page 
 -

Water withdrawal by sourceWater withdrawn by source. See page 

 -

Direct (Scope ‡) GHG emissionsClimate change – Our performance. See page 

 -

 -

 -

Energy indirect (Scope Š) GHG emissions
Other indirect (Scope ‹) GHG emissions

GHG emissions intensity

Climate change – On-farm lifecycle assessments. See page



-

Water discharge by quality and destinationWater discharge. See page 

-

Signicant spillsSigni—cant spills. See page 

-

Non-compliance with environmental laws and regulationsEnvironmental compliance. See page 

-

Negative environmental impacts in the supply chain

and actions taken

Working with farmers. See page 

SOCIAL TOPIC DISCLOSURES

-
New employee hires and employee turnoverOur People. See page 

 -
Types of injury and rates of injury, occupational diseases, lost days,

and absenteeism, and number of work-related fatalities

Health, safety and wellbeing. See page 


-

Programmes for upgrading employee skills and transition

assistance programmes

Learning and development. See page . Employee Assistance

Programme in Governance and ethical business

‹

 -
Diversity of governance bodies and employeesOur People. See page 

 -
Ratio of basic salary and remuneration of women to menGender pay. See page . Our People. See page 

-
Incidents of discrimination and corrective actions takenThe way we work hotline in Governance and ethical business

‹

 -
Operations that have been subject to human rights reviews or

impact assessments

Human Rights. See page 

 -
Political contributionsResponsible political involvement in Governance and

ethical business

‹

-
Assessment of the health and safety impacts of product and

service categories

Improving the nutritional pro—le of our products. See page 

Food safety and quality. See page



-
Incidents of non-compliance concerning product and service

information and labelling

Compliance with regulation. See page 

-
Incidents of non-compliance concerning marketing

communications

Compliance with regulation. See page 

-
Non-compliance with laws and regulations in the social and

economic area

Legal compliance in Governance and ethical business

‹

 For more information, see: www.fonterra.com AdditionalEmployeeData

 For more information, see: www.fonterra.com GovernanceEthicalBusinessNotes

 For more information, see: www.fonterra.com MaterialityAssessmentNotes

 For more information, see: www.fonterra.com EnvironmentalDataReportingNotes

Within scope of assurance.

ŽŒŽFONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT  FONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 

Appendices

APPENDICES

This report has been prepared in accordance with the Global

Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standards: Core option.

To achieve ʼCoreʼ compliance with the GRI standards we must

report against at least one disclosure for each material topic.

For more information:

www.globalreporting.org

BACK TO CONTENTS


To: The Stakeholders of Fonterra Co-operative Group Limited


Introduction and objectives of work


Bureau Veritas New-Zealand Ltd (“Bureau Veritas”) was engaged by Fonterra Co-operative Group Limited (“Fonterra”) to

provide independent limited assurance of its 2019 Sustainability Report (“the Report”). This Assurance Statement applies

to the related information included within the scope of assurance described below.


This information and its presentation in the Report are the sole responsibility of the management of Fonterra. Bureau

Veritas was not involved in the drafting of the Report. Our sole responsibility was to provide independent assurance of the

accuracy of information included. This is the third year in which we have provided limited assurance over the Fonterra

Sustainability Report.


Scope of Assurance


Fonterra requested Bureau Veritas to verify the accuracy and assure the material disclosures, both qualitative and

quantitative, presented in the Report. The Report was prepared in accordance with the GRI Standards Core option. The

complete list of assured elements is referred to within the GRI Index of the Report.


The scope of work was limited to the data and information related to sites and operations under which Fonterra has

operational control for the period of 1

st

August 2018 to 31

st

July 2019.


Methodology


As part of its independent limited assurance, Bureau Veritas undertook the following activities:

 Interviews and follow-up communication with relevant personnel;

 Review of documentary evidence produced by Fonterra representatives;

 Audit of performance data and factual information including source verification; and

 Review of Fonterra’s processes for identification, aggregation and analysis of relevant information, report content

and performance data.


Our work was planned and executed in a manner designed to produce a limited level of assurance and to provide a

sound basis for our conclusions.


Our assurance process is aligned with and informed by Bureau Veritas’ standard procedures and guidelines for external

verification of sustainability reports, the GRI Standards and the International Standard for Assurance Engagements

(ISAE) 3000.


Our findings


On the basis of our methodology and the activities described above, we provide limited assurance that:

 Nothing has come to our attention to indicate that the reviewed statements within the scope of our verification are

inaccurate and the information included therein is not fairly stated; and

 It is our opinion that Fonterra has established systems for the collection, aggregation and analysis of relevant

information and quantitative data.

INDEPENDENT ASSURANCE STATEMENT


Assurance

statement






Evaluation against the Global Reporting Initiative Standards (GRI Standards)


The Report was prepared in accordance with the GRI Standards Core Option, including appropriate considerations of the

reporting principles, profile disclosures, management approach disclosures and performance indicators.


Bureau Veritas’ evaluation of the Report included cross checking the GRI Index against referenced documents.


Limitations and Exclusions


Excluded from the scope of our work is any assurance of information relating to:

 Activities outside the defined reporting period;

 Statements of commitment to, or intention to undertake future actions by Fonterra;

 Statements of position, opinion, belief and/or aspiration by Fonterra;

 Financial data audited by an external third party; and

 Other sites and activities not included in the scope.


This independent assurance statement should not be relied upon to detect all errors, omissions or misstatements that

may exist within the Report.


Statement of independence, impartiality and competence


Bureau Veritas is an independent professional services company that specialises in Quality, Health, Safety, Social and

Environmental management with almost 200 years history in providing independent assurance services.


Bureau Veritas has implemented a Code of Ethics across the business to maintain high ethical standards among staff in

their day to day business activities. We are particularly vigilant in the prevention of conflicts of interest.


No member of the assurance team has a business relationship with Fonterra, its Directors or Managers beyond that

required of this assignment. We have conducted this assurance independently, and there has been no conflict of interest.


The independent assurance team has extensive experience in conducting assurance over environmental, social, security,

safety, health and ethical information, systems and processes, and through its combined experience in this field, an

excellent understanding of good practices in sustainability reporting and assurance.



Bureau Veritas New-Zealand Ltd

11

th

November 2019


Jeremy Leu

General Manager – Certification, Sustainability, Building & Infrastructure

ƒ­ƒ€FONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT  FONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 

Appendices

APPENDICES

BACK TO CONTENTS

REGISTERED OFFICE
Fonterra Co-operative Group Limited

Private Bag



Auckland 

New Zealand

Disclaimer

This report contains some forward-looking statements and projections. There can be no certainty of outcome in relation to the matters to which the forward-

looking statements and projections relate. These forward-looking statements and projections involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, assumptions and

other important factors that could cause the actual outcomes to be materially di„erent from the events or results expressed or implied by such statements and

projections. Those risks, uncertainties, assumptions and other important factors are not all within the control of Fonterra Co-operative Group Limited (Fonterra)

and its subsidiaries (the Fonterra Group) and cannot be predicted by the Fonterra Group.

While all reasonable care has been taken in the preparation of this report none of Fonterra or any of its respective subsidiaries, a‰liates and associated companies

(or any of their respective o‰cers, employees or agents) (Relevant Persons) makes any representation, assurance or guarantee as to the accuracy or completeness

of any information in this report or likelihood of ful‹lment of any forward-looking statement or projection or any outcomes expressed or implied in any forward-

looking statement or projection. The forward-looking statements and projections in this report reŒect views held only at the date of this report.

Statements about past performance are not necessarily indicative of future performance. Except as required by applicable law or any applicable Listing Rules,

the Relevant Persons disclaim any obligation or undertaking to update any information in this report.

This report does not constitute investment advice, or an inducement, recommendation or o„er to buy or sell any securities in Fonterra or the Fonterra

Shareholders’ Fund.

HEADQUARTERS

Fonterra Centre



Fanshawe Street

Auckland Central

Auckland 

New Zealand

Phone ”•–

—–



Fax ”•–

—–



Email: sustainability@fonterra.com

Associations, endorsements

and memberships

FONTERRA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 

APPENDICES

BACK TO CONTENTS

This document is printed using inks derived from
vegetable oils and fatty acid alkyl-esters (modied

vegetable oils) from renewable sources.

It is printed on environmentally responsible paper

stocks, produced using elemental chlorine free (ECF),

FSC

®

certied mixed source pulp manufactured

under strict ISO¦.

Data sourced from publicly available filings. Our datasets may not be complete. Automated analysis can produce errors. If you believe any data on this page is incorrect, please contact us at hello@nzxplorer.co.nz. For informational purposes only. Not investment advice.

Other issuers discussed similar conditions around this time

Matched by meaning across NZX announcement text, not keywords — based on our semantic index of announcement bodies.