Waiver from NZX Listing Rule 4.6.1(c)
NZ RegCo
0
05.08.2021
NZ RegCo Decision
Cavalier Corporation Limited (CAV)
Application for waiver from NZX Listing Rule 4.6.1(c)
NZ RegCo
1
Background
1. The information on which this decision is based on is set out in Appendix One to this decision.
This waiver will not apply if that information is not, or ceases to be, full and accurate in all material
respects.
2. The NZX Listing Rules (“Rules”) to which this decision relates are set out in Appendix Two.
3. Capitalised terms that are not defined in these decisions have the meanings given to them in the
Rules.
Waiver from Listing Rule 4.6.1(c)
Decision
4. Subject to the conditions set out in paragraph 6 below, and on the basis that the information
provided by Cavalier Corporation Limited (“CAV”) is complete and accurate in all material
respects, NZ RegCo grants CAV a waiver from Rule 4.6.1, to the extent that this Rule prohibits
CAV from issuing Equity Securities to Greg Smith as a consequence of Performance Rights which
were previously issued to Paul Alston and lapsed upon his resignation (“Performance Rights”)
(“Proposal”).
5. The waiver shall have the effect that the Equity Securities issued to Greg Smith “replace” the
Performance Rights issued to Paul Alston for the purposes of calculating the 3% threshold in
accordance with Rule 4.6.1(c) (“Replacement Securities”). That is, the Performance Rights
issued to Paul Alston will not be counted when calculating the Equity Securities that CAV will be
able to issue pursuant to Rule 4.6.1 to Greg Smith ahead of 24 December 2021.
6. The waiver in paragraphs 4 and 5 above is provided on the conditions that:
a. The Performance Rights held by Paul Alston have lapsed and will not, in any case, convert to
ordinary shares issued by CAV;
b. The Equity Securities that are issued to Greg Smith in accordance with the Proposal do not
result in CAV exceeding the 3% threshold in the Rule (within the relevant 12-month period);
c. The issue of Replacement Securities will not be backdated to 24 December 2020, but will
instead have a separate issue date from which CAV is required to calculate the relevant 3%
cap set by Rule 4.6.1(c).
Reasons
7. In coming to the decision to provide the waiver set out in paragraph 4 above, NZ RegCo has
considered that:
a. the policy underlying Rule 4.6.1, in combination with Rule 4.1.1, is to
i) recognise the valuable benefit to Issuers and their Equity Security Holders that Employee
share schemes provide, by providing an exception to Rule 4.1.1; and
ii) to limit the dilution of existing Equity Security holders as a result of issues made pursuant
to share schemes, by placing a limit on the percentage of Equity Securities that may be
issued to Employees within a period of a year; and
b. The grant of this waiver is consistent with the policy grounds behind Rule 4.6.1;
NZ RegCo
2
Confidentiality
8. CAV has requested that this application and any decision be kept confidential until the Board of
CAV has resolved to adopt the Proposal.
9. In accordance with Rule 9.7.2(a) NZ RegCo grants this request.
Appendix One
1. CAV is a Listed Issuer with Securities Quoted on the NZX Main Board.
2. On 24 December 2020, CAV announced the adoption of a new long-term incentive scheme
whereby performance rights (convertible into ordinary shares of CAV) were issued to selected
executive employees (“Performance Rights”).
3. Paul Alston, the Chief Executive of CAV, was issued 42.2% of the Performance Rights (entitling
him to circa 1.14% of CAV’s share capital). On 22 April 2021, CAV announced the resignation of
Paul Alston. As a consequence of Mr Alston’s resignation, the Performance Rights which had
been issued to him have lapsed.
4. On 23 June 2021, CAV announced the appointment of Greg Smith as the new CEO (effective on
26 July 2021). The Board of CAV now wishes to issue Equity Securities to Mr Smith to align his
incentives with shareholders (“Proposal”).
NZ RegCo
3
Appendix Two
Rule 4.6.1
An issuer may issue Equity Securities if:
...
(c) the number to be issued, together with all other Equity Securities of the same Class issued under
this Rule 4.6.1 over the shorter of the previous 12 months or the period since the Issuer was
Listed, will not exceed 3% of the aggregate of:
i. the total number of Equity Securities of that Class on issue at the commencement of that
Period, and
ii. the total number of Equity Securities of that Class issued during that period under Rules 4.2.1,
4.3, 4.5.1, 4.8 and 4.9
provided that for the purposes of this Rule 4.6.1:
(d) Financial Products which may Convert to Quoted Equity Securities are deemed to correspond in
number to, and be deemed to be of the same Class as, the Quoted Equity Securities into which
they may Convert.
...
Data sourced from publicly available filings. Our datasets may not be complete. Automated analysis can produce errors. If you believe any data on this page is incorrect, please contact us at hello@nzxplorer.co.nz. For informational purposes only. Not investment advice.
Other issuers discussed similar conditions around this time
Matched by meaning across NZX announcement text, not keywords — based on our semantic index of announcement bodies.
- ERD — EROAD: Waiver from NZX Listing Rules 4.2.2 and 4.19.12021-07-13
“NZ RegCo 0 13.07.2021 NZ RegCo Decision EROAD Limited (ERD) Application for waivers from NZX Listing Rules 4.2.2 and 4.19.1 NZ RegCo 1 Background 1. The information on which these decisions are based is set out in Appendix One to this decision.…”
- NZL — New Zealand Rural Land Company Limited: Waiver from NZX Listing Rule 5.1.1(b)2021-10-22
“NZ RegCo 18.10.2021 NZ RegCo Decision New Zealand Rural Land Company Limited (NS) (NZL) Application for waiver from NZX Listing Rule 5.1.1(b) NZ RegCo Background 1. The information on which this decision is based is set ou…”
- AIR — Air New Zealand: Waivers from NZX Listing Rules 5.1.1 and 5.2.1.2021-09-29
“30 September 2021 NZ RegCo Decision Air New Zealand Limited (NS) ("AIR") Application for waivers from NZX Listing Rules 5.1.1 and 5.2.1 NZ RegCo 2 Background 1. The information on which this decision is based is set out in Appendix One to this decision. The…”