MCK Target Company Statement
24 February 2025
in response to a full takeover offer by
CDL Hotels Holdings New Zealand Limited
You should read this Target Company Statement in its entirety, including the Independent Adviser’s
Report from Northington Partners Limited, carefully and in full when considering whether to accept
the Offer. This is an important document and requires your urgent attention. If you have any questions
in respect of this document or the Offer, you should seek advice from your financial or legal adviser.
TARGET COMPANY
STATEMENT
2MILLENNIUM & COPTHORNE HOTELS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED | TARGET COMPANY STATEMENT 2025
3
CONTENTS
Letter from the Chair of
the Independent Directors 5
Section 1: Independent Directors’ Recommendation 11
Section 2: Takeovers Code Disclosures 19
Schedules 1–5 33
Appendix: Independent Adviser’s Report 41
Cover Image: M Social Auckland 196/200 Quay Street, Auckland CBD.
Left: Beast & Butterflies Restaurant inside M Social Auckland.
CONTENTS
4MILLENNIUM & COPTHORNE HOTELS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED | TARGET COMPANY STATEMENT 2025
55
LETTER FROM
THE CHAIR OF
THE INDEPENDENT
DIRECTORS
LETTER FROM THE CHAIR OF THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS
Left: The bar at Beast & Butterflies Restaurant, M Social Auckland.
6MILLENNIUM & COPTHORNE HOTELS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED | TARGET COMPANY STATEMENT 2025
24 February 2025
Dear Shareholder,
The Independent Directors of MCK
strongly recommend shareholders
DO NOT ACCEPT the Offer. You should
ignore the Offer documents sent to you
by CDLHH NZ and TAKE NO ACTION.
You will have recently received a Takeover Offer
from CDL Hotels Holdings New Zealand Limited
(CDLHH NZ) to acquire all of your ordinary shares
(Ordinary Shares) in Millennium & Copthorne
Hotels New Zealand Limited (MCK) for $2.25 per
Ordinary Share (the Offer). CDLHH NZ is an indirect
wholly owned subsidiary of Singapore Exchange-
listed City Developments Limited (CDL Group).
CDLHH NZ currently owns 75.86% of the Ordinary
Shares and 91.34% of the redeemable non-voting
preference shares (Preference Shares) in MCK. The
Offer is for CDLHH NZ to acquire all the remaining
Ordinary Shares that it does not currently own.
MCK’s response to the Offer has been managed
by the committee of Independent Directors of the
MCK Board (the Independent Committee),
comprising Leslie Preston (Independent Committee
Chair), Colin Sim and Graham McKenzie. The
Independent Directors do not own any Ordinary
Shares or Preference Shares in MCK.
The two MCK directors who are associated with
CDLHH NZ, Kevin Hangchi and Eik Sheng Kwek, do not
sit on the Independent Committee because they have
a conflict of interest. In addition, MCK’s Managing
Director (Stuart Harrison) also does not sit on the
Independent Committee because he has a potential
conflict of interest due to his executive role with MCK.
The Independent Committee has sought advice
from Cameron Partners Limited (Cameron
Partners) as financial adviser and Bell Gully as legal
adviser, and carefully considered the report from
the Independent Adviser, Northington Partners
Limited (Northington or the Independent Adviser),
in assessing the merits of the Offer and making its
recommendation to shareholders.
Reasons NOT TO ACCEPT the Offer
The Offer of $2.25 per Ordinary Share is significantly
below the Independent Adviser’s valuation range of
$4.40 to $5.00 per Ordinary Share (with the midpoint
of the Independent Adviser’s valuation range
being $4.70 per Ordinary Share). The Independent
Adviser concludes that “the mid-point value of our
assessed value range ($4.70 per share) is more
than double the Offer Price of $2.25. Even allowing
for a reasonable margin of error in relation to our
valuation, we conclude that the Offer significantly
undervalues the Company.”
The Independent Adviser’s Report is set out in the
Appendix to this Target Company Statement. The
Independent Committee strongly encourages all
holders of Ordinary Shares to read the full Target
Company Statement (including the Independent
Adviser’s Report).
The primary reasons why the Independent Directors
believe you should NOT ACCEPT the Offer are:
1. The Offer price of $2.25 per Ordinary Share
is significantly below the Independent
Adviser’s assessment of value for the
Ordinary Shares. The Independent Adviser
has assessed a value range of $4.40 to
$5.00 per Ordinary Share, with a midpoint
of $4.70 per Ordinary Share.
2. The timing of the Offer significantly
discounts the benefits to the Company that
shareholders can expect as the hotel and
property markets recover. MCK remains
confident in its outlook and its ability to
continue to make progress under its Revive
and Thrive Strategy. The Independent
Directors believe that MCK is well positioned
to benefit from a recovery in the tourism and
property markets.
LETTER FROM THE CHAIR OF
THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS
7
3. The Offer undervalues recent capital
expenditure on key hotels. Over the last
three financial years, MCK has invested
approximately $59.0 million of capital
expenditure on a number of hotels, the
majority of which was spent on major
refurbishments to the Millennium Hotel
Queenstown, the Millennium Hotel Rotorua,
the Copthorne Hotel & Resort Bay of Islands
and the Copthorne Hotel Palmerston North.
The Independent Directors believe that
the expected benefits from this capital
expenditure are yet to be fully reflected in
MCK’s operating results.
4. The Offer is at a material discount to the
market value of MCK’s net assets and
significantly undervalues the $129.5
million of recent acquisitions made by
MCK. These assets were acquired at market
values, with the acquisitions supported
at the MCK Board by the two CDLHH NZ
representative directors. MCK has recently
acquired 50% of Sofitel Brisbane Central
for $95.4 million (December 2023), hotel
development land in Whangarei for $2.2
million (August 2024), and The Mayfair Hotel
Christchurch for $31.9 million (January
2025). Despite CDLHH NZ’s support for MCK
to acquire these assets at market values,
the Offer is at a material discount to MCK’s
internally assessed market value of its net
assets of $5.39 per Ordinary Share.
1
5. The Offer does not value the benefits that
could be captured by CDLHH NZ. There are
benefits available to CDLHH NZ from acquiring
all of the Ordinary Shares. These strategic
benefits include the potential redemption of
the Preference Shares at a price below the
Offer price for the Ordinary Shares, complete
control of MCK’s business if MCK ceases to be
listed on NZX, and potential cost synergies.
Further details are set out in Section 1 of this Target
Company Statement.
Offer conditions
The Offer is conditional on (among other matters)
CDLHH NZ receiving acceptances in relation to the
Ordinary Shares, which when taken together with
the Ordinary Shares that it already holds or controls,
confer on CDLHH NZ 90% or more of the voting rights
in MCK. Should CDLHH NZ reach this threshold, it may
compulsorily acquire all of the remaining Ordinary
Shares in MCK. CDLHH NZ is entitled to waive this
condition, in which case (if all other conditions have
been satisfied or, if capable of waiver, waived) it could
take up all acceptances of the Offer received.
The Offer is also conditional on (among other
matters) CDLHH NZ receiving approval under the
Overseas Investment Act. This may take some time.
Furthermore, CDLHH NZ has included as a condition
of its Offer, that MCK may not pay or declare any
dividend during the period from (and including)
20 January 2025 (being the date on which CDLHH
NZ gave its Takeover Notice) until the date on
which the Offer is declared unconditional or
lapses. This means that shareholders will not
receive a final dividend for FY24 (unless the Offer
lapses and the Board subsequently decides to
pay a dividend in respect of FY24). In the last two
financial years, MCK paid a final dividend of 3.0
cents per Ordinary Share in May 2023 and in May
2024. If the Offer is successful, shareholders will
not receive any final dividend in respect of FY24.
Timing
The Offer must remain open until at least 5.00pm
NZT on 8 May 2025. CDLHH NZ may elect to
extend the Offer beyond this date to 7 July 2025
(in the latest permitted circumstances).
If you accept the Offer, your decision is irrevocable
and cannot be withdrawn. There is no benefit
to accepting the Offer early and prior to the
satisfaction of all of the conditions. If you accept
the Offer early, you will not be paid until all
conditions have been met, satisfied or waived.
LETTER FROM THE CHAIR OF THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS
LETTER FROM THE CHAIR OF THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS
1. Per Investor Presentation for FY24 results.
8MILLENNIUM & COPTHORNE HOTELS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED | TARGET COMPANY STATEMENT 2025
MCK has more than 1,300 holders of Ordinary
Shares
2
and as at 20 February 2025 (being the
latest practicable date before the date of this
Target Company Statement), CDLHH NZ had not
announced that it had received acceptances of
the Offer in respect of an additional 1% or more
of the Ordinary Shares.
Preference Shares
MCK also has redeemable non-voting preference
shares listed on the NZX Main Board under the ticker
‘MCKPA’ (Preference Shares). CDLHH NZ owns 91.34%
of the Preference Shares. Although the Preference
Shares rank equally with the Ordinary Shares with
respect to all distributions made by MCK (subject to
a liquidation preference) they do not (and are not
required under the Takeovers Code to) form part of
the Offer. However, independently of the Offer, CDLHH
NZ has indicated that it is willing to acquire the
Preference Shares at $1.70 per share via its broker,
Craigs Investment Partners Limited, through buying
on the NZX Main Board (the RPS Offer).
CDLHH NZ has stated that it may also elect to seek to
have the Preference Shares issued by MCK redeemed,
if CDLHH NZ is successful in acquiring all of the
outstanding Ordinary Shares. Preference Shares can
be redeemed by MCK at any time if the redemption is
approved by holders of Preference Shares by way of
special resolution. CDLHH NZ has sufficient votes to
pass such a special resolution. The redemption price
for each Preference Share would be the higher of their
20-day volume weighted average price or their issue
price of $0.64.
Historically, the Preference Shares have traded broadly
in line with the Ordinary Shares (reflecting essentially
the same economic rights). However, the Ordinary
Shares traded at $2.40 and the Preference Shares
traded at $1.80 per share on Thursday, 20 February
2025, being the last practicable trading day prior to
the release of this Target Company Statement. To the
extent the Preference Shares were redeemed for a
price below the Offer price for the Ordinary Shares,
it would increase the value of the Ordinary Shares.
CDLHH NZ is suggesting this could happen
in the event its Offer is successful.
The Independent Directors make no recommendation
in respect of the RPS Offer. The Takeovers Code does
not apply to the RPS Offer and this Target Company
Statement does not include information about the
RPS Offer. Shareholders who are considering selling
their Preference Shares as part of the RPS Offer
or otherwise are recommended to seek their own
professional advice.
In assessing the Offer for Ordinary Shares, MCK
shareholders who also own Preference Shares may
wish to consider the implications for their Preference
Shares (including their potential redemption) if the
Offer is successful.
Summary
MCK offers its shareholders a unique investment
opportunity as the only hotels and property group
listed on the NZX.
Our core focus is to deliver value to all MCK
shareholders, and we want all of our shareholders to
benefit from the future value we believe is available
through MCK. We believe that if the major shareholder
wishes to acquire all of MCK, it should pay an
appropriate price. The Independent Directors are
firmly of the view that CDLHH NZ’s current Offer
is too low and is inadequate.
This document sets out your Independent Director’s
formal response to the Offer, including reasons
why we believe you should NOT accept the Offer.
However, the decision whether or not to accept the
Offer is an individual decision. The Independent
Directors recommend you read the Target Company
Statement carefully and in full, including the
Independent Adviser’s Report, before making a
decision (including the Independent Adviser’s
assessment of the merits of the Offer on pages 5, 6,
36 and 37 of the Independent Adviser’s Report).
LETTER FROM THE CHAIR OF
THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS
(CONTINUED)
2. As at 13 February 2025.
9LETTER FROM THE CHAIR OF THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS
LETTER FROM THE CHAIR OF THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS
If you have any queries in relation to the Offer,
please email enquiries@mckhotels.co.nz. If you are
in any doubt how to respond to the Offer, please
seek financial advice from an independent, qualified
adviser in relation to your particular circumstances.
Your Independent Directors will continue to keep you
updated on all material developments in relation to
the Offer. Announcements are available on the NZX
website (www.nzx.com/companies/MCK) and the MCK
website (https://mckhotels.co.nz/investors/).
Yours sincerely,
Leslie Preston
Chair of the Independent Directors Committee of MCK
10MILLENNIUM & COPTHORNE HOTELS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED | TARGET COMPANY STATEMENT 2025
1111
SEC TION 1:
INDEPENDENT
DIRECTORS’
RECOMMENDATION
SECTION 1: INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS’ RECOMMENDATION
Left: The newly refurbished reception
area at Millennium Hotel Queenstown.
12MILLENNIUM & COPTHORNE HOTELS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED | TARGET COMPANY STATEMENT 2025
The Independent Directors unanimously recommend
that you DO NOT ACCEPT the Offer from CDLHH NZ in
respect of your Ordinary Shares in MCK.
The Independent Directors did not encourage or
solicit CDLHH NZ’s Offer.
The primary reasons for the Independent Director’s
DO NOT ACCEPT recommendation are set out below
and discussed throughout this Section:
1. The Offer price of $2.25 per Ordinary Share
is significantly below the Independent
Adviser’s assessment of value for the
Ordinary Shares. The Independent Adviser
has assessed a value range of $4.40 to
$5.00 per Ordinary Share, with a midpoint
of $4.70 per Ordinary Share.
2. The timing of the Offer significantly
discounts the benefits to the Company
that shareholders can expect as the hotel
and property markets recover.
3. The Offer undervalues recent capital
expenditure on key hotels.
4. The Offer is at a material discount to the
market value of MCK’s net assets and
significantly undervalues the $129.5
million of recent acquisitions made
by MCK. These assets were acquired at
market values, with the acquisitions
supported at the MCK Board by the two
CDLHH NZ representative directors.
5. The Offer does not value the benefits
that could be captured by CDLHH NZ.
Further details are set out on the following pages.
The Independent Directors strongly encourage
you to take these factors into account, together
with the assessment of the Independent Adviser
as to the merits of the Offer, when considering
your response to CDLHH NZ’s Offer. The Independent
Adviser’s assessment of the merits of the Offer is
set out on pages 5, 6, 36 and 37 of the Independent
Adviser’s Report.
The Independent Adviser’s Report is set out in the
Appendix to this Target Company Statement.
Please read the Target Company Statement carefully
and in full when considering whether or not to accept
the Offer. The decision whether or not to accept
the Offer is an individual decision. If you have any
questions in respect of this document or the Offer,
you should seek financial advice from an independent,
qualified adviser.
1. The Offer price of $2.25 per Ordinary
Share is significantly below the
Independent Adviser’s assessment of value
for the Ordinary Shares. The Independent
Adviser has assessed a value range of
$4.40 to $5.00 per Ordinary Share, with
a midpoint of $4.70 per Ordinary Share
Northington Partners Limited (Northington or the
Independent Adviser) was engaged to prepare an
Independent Adviser’s Report to assess the merits
of the Offer for holders of the Ordinary Shares.
Northington’s independent report is attached in full
in the Appendix to this Target Company Statement.
Northington states that the “mid-point value of
our assessed range ($4.70 per share) is more
than double the Offer Price of $2.25. Even
allowing for a reasonable margin of error in
relation to our valuation, we conclude that the
Offer significantly undervalues the Company.”
The Independent Adviser’s Report confirms the
view of the Independent Directors that the Offer
is too low and is inadequate.
Comparison of Offer Price to Assessed Value
The Independent Adviser has assessed a valuation
range of $4.40 to $5.00 per Ordinary Share,
with a mid-point of $4.70 per Ordinary Share.
This is significantly higher than the Offer Price
of $2.25 per Ordinary Share. The Offer price
represents a material discount to the mid-point
of the Independent Adviser’s valuation range
as illustrated in the chart following.
SECTION 1: INDEPENDENT
DIRECTORS’ RECOMMENDATION
13
The Independent Adviser notes that its value
range for MCK of $4.40 to $5.00 per Ordinary
Share compares to MCK’s reported book value
per Ordinary Share of $3.46 as of 31 December
2024. The book value reflects the carrying value
for MCK’s assets, which are recorded at cost less
accumulated depreciation and impairment losses.
If MCK’s properties were reported at market value
(as was MCK’s accounting policy prior to FY21), the
Independent Adviser’s assessment of the adjusted
net asset value per Ordinary Share is $5.71 as of
31 December 2024 (prior to tax considerations).
Predominantly allowing for the implied deferred
tax on the market revaluations (and, to a lesser
extent, capital gains tax on the Sydney Apartments
value), MCK’s internally assessed market value of
its net assets is $5.39 per share.
The Independent Adviser states its value range
therefore represents a discount to its market value
adjusted net asset value per Ordinary Share of 13%
to 23% (or a 7% to 18% discount to MCK’s reported
adjusted net asset value of $5.39) and that this
discount largely reflects company overheads which
are reported in the Independent Adviser’s valuation
framework but not incorporated into the property
market valuations.
Valuation Approach
Based on the unique characteristics of MCK’s hotel
and property investments, the Independent Adviser
has assessed MCK’s value on a component “sum-
of-the-parts” basis both as a going concern (Going
Concern Value) and under an orderly realisation of
assets through the sale of its hotel, residential and
investment properties (Wind-Up Value).
The Independent Adviser states in the Independent
Adviser’s Report that it has assumed for the purposes
of the Going Concern Value and the Wind-Up Value
that the number of MCK shares on issue is the fully
diluted number of both the Ordinary Shares and the
Preference Shares. Therefore, MCK’s Ordinary Shares
and Preference Shares were valued equally by the
Independent Adviser. To the extent MCK’s Preference
Shares were redeemed for a price below $4.70 per
share (being the mid-point of the assessed valuation
range), the Independent Adviser’s valuation range for
Ordinary Shares would increase.
The Independent Adviser also notes in the
Independent Adviser’s Report that although the Offer
price represents a premium of 29.0% to the 20-day
VWAP of MCK’s Ordinary Shares ($1.75) prior to
CDLHH NZ’s announcement of its intention to make
an offer (on 20 January 2025), Northington suggests
that MCK’s share price is of limited relevance in this
instance. This is because the observed NZX prices
relate to trades for small parcels of shares and reflect
that MCK shares are very illiquid. The Independent
Adviser suggests that the low price (relative to its
assessed value) may also reflect that CDLHH NZ
has control of MCK and is pursuing a strategy which
favours long-term capital appreciation over cash
distributions in the short term.
Consequences for Minority Shareholders
if the Offer is Not Successful
The Independent Adviser discusses the
consequences for minority shareholders if
the Offer is not successful on pages 6, 36
and 37 of the Independent Adviser’s Report.
SECTION 1: INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS’ RECOMMENDATION
SECTION 1: INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS’ RECOMMENDATION
$6.00
$5.00
$4.00
$3.00
$2.00
$1.00
Offer PriceIndependent
Adviser’s valuation
range: Low
Mid-point $4.70
$2.25
$4.40
$5.00
Independent
Adviser’s valuation
range: High
14MILLENNIUM & COPTHORNE HOTELS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED | TARGET COMPANY STATEMENT 2025
The Independent Adviser states that if the Offer
conditions are not fully satisfied or waived by CDLHH
NZ, the Offer will lapse and MCK will continue to
operate in its current form. It assesses that MCK
shares are likely to continue to trade at a significant
discount to the Independent Adviser’s assessed value
range because of the lack of liquidity and ongoing
minority discount attributed to small share parcels.
The Independent Adviser states that if the Offer
is unsuccessful, it believes that CDLHH NZ will
remain motivated to reach the 90% ownership
level needed to utilise the compulsory acquisition
provisions of the Takeovers Code. One of those
options is to make a further takeover offer at a
higher price (or to increase the price for the current
Offer in accordance with the Takeovers Code).
The Independent Adviser says that in its view
the likelihood of an alternative takeover offer
emerging for MCK from a party other than CDLHH
NZ is extremely low. As CDLHH NZ already controls
75.9% of the voting rights in MCK, any alternative
takeover offer would require CDLHH NZ’s support.
The Independent Adviser also states that while the
Offer price of $2.25 per Ordinary Share is considerably
lower than the assessed value range of $4.40 to $5.00
per Ordinary Share, some shareholders may see the
Offer as an opportunity to exit their investment in
MCK at a known price (without brokerage costs). It
notes that Ordinary Shares are highly illiquid and, in
its view, will remain so if the Offer is unsuccessful.
Given the uncertainties relating to the share price and
the market liquidity after the Offer has closed, the
Independent Adviser notes that some shareholders
may accept a price lower than the perceived value
of the Ordinary Shares in return for a certain exit.
However, the Independent Directors are firmly
of the view that the current Offer price is too
low and, even if you do wish to accept the Offer,
there is no benefit to accepting the Offer early.
2. The timing of the Offer significantly
discounts the benefits to the Company
that shareholders can expect as the
hotel and property markets recover
MCK’s results for the year ending 31 December 2024
recorded consolidated group revenue of $176.2
million (2023: $145.7 million), group operating
profit before tax and non-controlling interests of
$47.1 million (2023: $37.5 million) and earnings
per share of 17.17 cents
3
(2023: 13.65 cents). MCK
remains confident in its outlook and of its ability
to continue to make progress under its Revive
and Thrive Strategy. The Independent Directors
believe that MCK is well positioned to benefit from
a recovery in the tourism and property markets.
During 2024, MCK experienced a strong turnaround
in its hotels business but it has still not yet fully
recovered from the impact of the COVID pandemic
on the tourism market:
• New Zealand hotel revenue grew 8.3% to $109.5
million in 2024 ($101.1 million in 2023).
• Hotel occupancy improved during 2024 but has
still not recovered to pre-COVID levels. From
2023 to 2024, MCK’s occupancy improved from
61% to 66% across its New Zealand hotels and
further improvement has been evidenced in
January and during February 2025. However,
occupancy still remains below 2019 levels (81%).
• 2024 New Zealand hotel revenue was 13.5% below
2019 and EBITDA was 53.5% lower than 2019.
• MCK strategically focuses on the international
visitor markets. In 2019, international visitors
accounted for 54% of all occupancy in New
Zealand hotels.
• International visitor arrivals are expected to
return to pre-COVID levels by Q1 2027.
4
• The ongoing recovery of New Zealand’s tourism
sector is expected to drive earnings growth within
MCK’s hotel business in 2025 and beyond.
SECTION 1: INDEPENDENT
DIRECTORS’ RECOMMENDATION
(CONTINUED)
3. Adjusted for one-off deferred tax adjustment, made as
a result of government legislation change.
4. TECNZ International Arrivals Forecast January 2025, Westpac.
15
• The Sofitel Brisbane Central had a soft first
quarter, but saw solid demand across its core
segments as 2024 progressed.
The below charts illustrate the ongoing recovery
in New Zealand’s tourism sector and MCK’s hotel
occupancy, revenue and earnings.
The Independent Directors believe that the property
markets are expected to begin to recover as interest
rates fall and economies improve:
• The market value of CDL Investments New Zealand
Limited (CDI), MCK’s 65% subsidiary, is currently
impacted by weakness in the property market.
As the property market begins to stabilise and
potentially improve (see the forecasts in the
below chart), the market value of CDI’s assets and
the profitability of its developments would likely
increase; and
• improvements in the property market more
generally would also lift the market valuations
for CDI’s tenanted industrial property and
MCK’s other property assets (hotels, Sydney
apartments, vacant surplus land).
SECTION 1: INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS’ RECOMMENDATION
5. Statistics New Zealand Visitor Arrivals.
6. RBNZ February 2025 Monetary Policy Statement.
FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24
43.4
14.6
22.9
4.8
19.3
17.4
New Zealand hotel EBITDA ($m)
FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24
126.6
64.1
55.2
65.2
101.1
109.5
New Zealand hotel revenue ($m)
Jan 20
Jan 21
Jan 22
Jan 23
Jan 24
Apr 20
Apr 21
Apr 22
Apr 23
Apr 24
Jul 20
Jul 21
Jul 22
Jul 23
Jul 24
Oct 20
Oct 21
Oct 22
Oct 23
Oct 24
Occupancy
International
Arrivals
International visitor numbers to New Zealand
and MCK’s New Zealand hotel occupancy
5
SECTION 1: INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS’ RECOMMENDATION
Dec 20Dec 21Dec 22Dec 23Dec 24Dec 25Dec 26Dec 27
4,000
3,500
3,000
2,500
2,000
Actual
Forecast
CoreLogic’s New Zealand house price index
6
16MILLENNIUM & COPTHORNE HOTELS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED | TARGET COMPANY STATEMENT 2025
SECTION 1: INDEPENDENT
DIRECTORS’ RECOMMENDATION
(CONTINUED)
3. The Offer undervalues recent
capital expenditure on key hotels
MCK is partially through a significant
refurbishment and upgrade of hotel properties.
This programme commenced in 2022 and
is expected to be completed in 2025.
Over the last three years, MCK has allocated
approximately $59.0 million of capital expenditure
on a number of hotels, the majority of which was
spent on major refurbishments and upgrades to:
• Millennium Hotel Queenstown;
• Millennium Hotel Rotorua;
• Copthorne Hotel & Resort Bay of Islands; and
• Copthorne Hotel Palmerston North.
Recently completed refurbishments and upgrades
are expected to lift average daily room rates and
earnings. Over 390 rooms have been refurbished
in the last three years and over 140 additional
rooms are due to be completed in FY25. In total,
this represents over 30% of MCK’s 1,720 owned
New Zealand hotel rooms (excluding The Mayfair
Hotel Christchurch). The Independent Directors
believe that the expected benefits to revenue and
earnings from this recent capital expenditure has
yet to be fully reflected in MCK’s operating results.
The Independent Directors believe that the Offer
undervalues the capital expenditure investment
made to date, and being completed, by MCK.
4. The Offer is at a material discount to
the market value of MCK’s net assets
and significantly undervalues the $129.5
million of recent acquisitions made by
MCK. These assets were acquired at
market values, with the acquisitions
supported at the MCK Board by the two
CDLHH NZ representative directors
Strategic acquisitions are a key component of the
growth strategy for MCK and its subsidiaries. As the
controlling shareholder, CDLHH NZ has supported this
strategy and MCK’s recent investments.
MCK has invested $129.5 million on hotel acquisitions
in the past two years comprising:
• $31.9 million for The Mayfair Hotel Christchurch
in January 2025;
• $2.2 million for development land in Whangarei
in August 2024; and
• $95.4 million for 50% of Sofitel Brisbane
Central in December 2023. The remaining 50%
was acquired by a subsidiary of CDL Group.
By supporting recent investments and acquisitions,
CDLHH NZ has indicated that it is willing to pay
market value for hotel and property assets.
Furthermore, CDL Group partnered with MCK in
acquiring Sofitel Brisbane Central.
MCK’s internally assessed market value of its net
assets implies a price of $5.39 per share.
7
Despite
a willingness to acquire assets at market value,
CDLHH NZ’s Offer for MCK of $2.25 per Ordinary
Share is at a material discount to the net market
value of MCK’s assets and appears to significantly
undervalue MCK’s recently acquired properties.
5. The Offer does not value the benefits
that could be captured by CDLHH NZ
MCK’s Independent Directors believe that there
are potentially significant benefits available to
CDLHH NZ from fully acquiring MCK. These strategic
benefits include:
• The potential redemption of Preference Shares;
• Complete control of MCK’s business if MCK ceases
to be listed on NZX; and
• Potential cost synergies.
The above strategic benefits are discussed below.
If the Offer is successful, these strategic benefits
could be captured by CDLHH NZ and its shareholders,
with no value benefit for the other holders of the
Ordinary Shares. Given the significant strategic
value in CDLHH NZ having full ownership of MCK,
the Independent Directors believe that the other
holders of the Ordinary Shares should share in a
proportion of these benefits as part of the Offer.
17SECTION 1: INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS’ RECOMMENDATION
The potential redemption of Preference Shares
MCK’s Preference Shares are listed on the NZX Main
Board under the ticker ‘MCKPA’. CDLHH NZ owns
91.34% of the Preference Shares. Although the
Preference Shares rank equally with the Ordinary
Shares with respect to all distributions made by
MCK (subject to a liquidation preference) they do
not (and are not required under the Takeovers Code
to) form part of the Offer. However, independently
of the Offer, CDLHH NZ has indicated that it is willing
to acquire the Preference Shares at $1.70 per share
via its broker, Craigs Investment Partners Limited,
through buying on the NZX Main Board.
CDLHH NZ has stated that it may also elect to seek to
have the Preference Shares issued by MCK redeemed,
if CDLHH NZ is successful in acquiring all of the
outstanding Ordinary Shares. Preference Shares can
be redeemed by MCK at any time if the redemption is
approved by holders of Preference Shares by way of
special resolution. CDLHH NZ has sufficient votes to
pass such a special resolution. The redemption price
for each Preference Share would be the higher of their
20-day volume weighted average price or $0.64.
Historically, the Preference Shares have traded
broadly in line with the Ordinary Shares (reflecting
essentially the same economic rights).
8
However,
the Ordinary Shares traded at $2.40 and the
Preference Shares traded at $1.80 per share
on Thursday, 20 February 2025, being the last
practicable trading day prior to the release of
this Target Company Statement. To the extent the
Preference Shares were redeemed for a price below
the Offer Price for the Ordinary Shares, it would
increase the value of the Ordinary Shares.
The Independent Directors make no recommendation
in respect of the RPS Offer. The Takeovers Code does
not apply to the RPS Offer and this Target Company
Statement does not include information about the
RPS Offer. Shareholders who are considering selling
their Preference Shares as part of the RPS Offer
or otherwise are recommended to seek their own
professional advice.
In assessing the Offer for Ordinary Shares, MCK
shareholders who also own Preference Shares
may wish to consider the implications for their
Preference Shares (including their potential
redemption) if the Offer is successful.
Complete control of MCK’s capital structure
and business
MCK currently has a robust balance sheet with
debt headroom and the ability to raise equity
from shareholders. Although CDLHH NZ effectively
currently controls MCK’s capital structure, there are
some constraints upon CDLHH NZ due to MCK being
listed and the presence of minority shareholders.
Fully acquiring all of the shares in MCK would provide
CDLHH NZ with complete control of MCK’s capital
structure and business, which offers strategic
benefits and optionality to further accelerate MCK’s
growth through acquisitions and investment.
Fully acquiring all of the shares in MCK would provide
CDL Group direct control of CDI and full ownership of
Sofitel Brisbane Central. This could provide strategic
benefits for CDL Group.
Potential cost synergies
Cost synergies are potentially available to CDLHH
NZ from fully acquiring all of the shares in MCK.
The Independent Adviser has not separately valued
the likely benefits that CDLHH NZ could capture.
Cost synergies are likely to include avoiding costs
associated with being a listed entity and potential
efficiency improvements from full integration into
CDL Group.
SECTION 1: INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS’ RECOMMENDATION
7. Per Investor Presentation for FY24 results.
8. See pages 27 and 28 of the Independent Adviser’s Report.
18MILLENNIUM & COPTHORNE HOTELS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED | TARGET COMPANY STATEMENT 2025
1919
SECTION 2:
TAKEOVERS CODE
DISCLOSURES
SECTION 2: TAKEOVERS CODE DISCLOSURES
Left: A friendly greeting from our Social Team at M Social Auckland
20MILLENNIUM & COPTHORNE HOTELS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED | TARGET COMPANY STATEMENT 2025
SECTION 2: TAKEOVERS
CODE DISCLOSURES
1. Date
This target company statement (the
Target Company Statement) is dated
24 February 2025.
2. Offer
2.1 This Target Company Statement relates to a
full takeover offer (the Offer) by CDL Hotels
Holdings New Zealand Limited (CDLHH NZ)
to purchase all of the ordinary shares (the
Ordinary Shares) in Millennium & Copthorne
Hotels New Zealand Limited (MCK) that it
does not already own for a purchase price of
$2.25 per Ordinary Share, payable in cash.
2.2 The terms of the Offer are set out in an
offer document dated 10 February 2025
(the Offer Document), a copy of which was
sent to holders of Ordinary Shares on 10
February 2025.
2.3 MCK also has redeemable non-voting
preference shares listed on the NZX Main
Board under the ticker ‘MCKPA’ (Preference
Shares). The Preference Shares do not form
part of the Offer because they are not equity
securities for the purposes of the Takeovers
Code. However, independently of the Offer,
CDLHH NZ has indicated in the Offer Document
that it is willing to acquire the Preference
Shares at $1.70 per share via its broker, Craigs
Investment Partners Limited, through buying
on the NZX Main Board (the RPS Offer). In its
Offer Document, CDLHH NZ states that it may
also elect seek to have the Preference Shares
redeemed if it is successful in acquiring all of
the outstanding Ordinary Shares.
2.4 The Independent Directors make no
recommendation in respect of the RPS Offer.
The Takeovers Code does not apply to the RPS
Offer and this Target Company Statement does
not include information about the RPS Offer.
Shareholders who are considering selling their
Preference Shares as part of the RPS Offer or
otherwise are recommended to seek their own
professional advice.
3. Target Company
(a) The name of the target company
is Millennium & Copthorne Hotels
New Zealand Limited (NZX: MCK).
(b) The postal address of MCK is Floor 7,
23 Customs Street East, Auckland
Central, Auckland, 1010, New Zealand.
(c) MCK’s investor website is
https://mckhotels.co.nz/investors/.
(d) The contact email address for MCK
is enquiries@mckhotels.co.nz.
4. Directors of MCK
The directors of MCK are:
(a) Colin Sim
(Chair and Independent Director);
(b) Leslie Sue Preston
(Independent Director and Chair of
Independent Directors’ Committee
formed to consider the Offer);
(c) Graham Andrew McKenzie
(Independent Director);
(d) Kevin Hangchi
(Non-Executive Director);
(e) Eik Sheng Kwek
(Non-Executive Director); and
(f) Stuart Nigel Bruce Harrison
(Managing Director).
5. Ownership of MCK’s equity securities
5.1 The only class of equity securities on issue
in MCK is the Ordinary Shares.
5.2 MCK also has Preference Shares on issue.
However, these are not equity securities
for the purposes of the Takeovers Code.
Accordingly, all references to “equity
securities” throughout this Target Company
Statement refers only to the Ordinary Shares,
unless otherwise specified.
21
5.3 Schedule 1 to this Target Company Statement
sets out the number and the percentage of
Ordinary Shares held or controlled by each
director or senior manager
9
of MCK (a Director
or Senior Manager, respectively) and their
associates. Because Directors Eik Sheng
Kwek and Kevin Hangchi are associated with
CDLHH NZ, Schedule 1 includes the Ordinary
Shares held by CDLHH NZ. Except as set out in
Schedule 1 to this Target Company Statement,
no Director or Senior Manager in MCK or
their associates holds or controls any equity
securities of MCK.
5.4 To the knowledge of MCK, no other person
(other than the Directors, Senior Managers
or their associates, to the extent set out in
Schedule 1) holds or controls 5% or more
of any class of equity securities of MCK.
In particular, details of the shareholdings
held or controlled by CDLHH NZ and City
Developments Limited (being the only
persons who hold or control 5% or more of
the Ordinary Shares) are set out in Schedule 1.
5.5 No equity securities have, during the
two-year period ending on the date of this
Target Company Statement, been issued
to the Directors and Senior Managers or
their associates.
5.6 No Director or Senior Manager, or an associate
of a Director or Senior Manager, has obtained
a beneficial interest under any employee share
scheme or other remuneration arrangement
during the two-year period ending on the date
of this Target Company Statement.
6. Trading in MCK equity securities
6.1 Details of the acquisition or disposition of
Ordinary Shares during the six-month period
ending on 20 February 2025 (being the latest
practicable date before the date of this
Target Company Statement) by Directors,
Senior Managers or their associates and,
to the knowledge of MCK, any other person
holding or controlling 5% or more of the
Ordinary Shares are set out in Schedule 2.
6.2 Except as set out in Schedule 2:
(a) no Director, Senior Manager or
associate of a Director or Senior
Manager; or
(b) to the knowledge of MCK, any person
holding or controlling 5% or more of
any class of equity securities of MCK,
has acquired or disposed of equity securities
of MCK during the six-month period ending on
20 February 2025 (being the latest practicable
date before the date of this Target Company
Statement).
7. Acceptance of Offer by Directors
and Senior Managers
7.1 The table below sets out, as at the date of this
Target Company Statement, the name of every
Director and Senior Manager, and associate of
a Director and Senior Manager, who (to MCK’s
knowledge) has accepted or intends to accept
the Offer and the number of Ordinary Shares in
respect of which the person has accepted, or
intends to accept the Offer.
10
9. For the purposes of this Target Company Statement, the Independent
Directors have determined that the senior managers of MCK for the
purposes of the Takeovers Code are Stuart Nigel Bruce Harrison (Managing
Director), Anand Rambhai (Vice President Finance), Takeshi Ito (Vice
President Legal & Company Secretary), Kenneth Orr (Vice President
Operations), Louise Borton (Director, Property Management), Brendan
Davies (Director, International and Corporate Sales), Nathan Kruger
(Director, Information Technology), Lisa Maclean (Director, Human
Resources), Josie Wilson (Director, Revenue and Distribution) and Melanie
Beattie (Vice President Sales and Partnerships).
10. This information is based on responses to questionnaires circulated to
the Directors and Senior Managers by MCK after receipt of CDLHH NZ’s
Takeover Notice.
SECTION 2: TAKEOVERS CODE DISCLOSURES
NameDescriptionNumber of Ordinary Shares
Nathan KrugerSenior Manager134.80
SECTION 2: TAKEOVERS CODE DISCLOSURES
22MILLENNIUM & COPTHORNE HOTELS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED | TARGET COMPANY STATEMENT 2025
8. Ownership of equity securities of
CDLHH NZ and its related companies
8.1 Schedule 3 to this Target Company
Statement sets out, as at the date of this
Target Company Statement, the name
of every Director, Senior Manager and
associate of a Director or Senior Manager
who holds or controls equity securities of:
(a) CDLHH NZ; or
(b) any related company of CDLHH NZ
(other than MCK),
in each case, together with the number,
designation and percentage of equity
securities of that class of equity securities.
8.2 Because of CDLHH NZ’s current shareholding
in MCK, MCK and its subsidiaries are each
related companies of CDLHH NZ. Accordingly:
(a) the number, designation and
percentage of Ordinary Shares held
or controlled by every Director, Senior
Manager and associate of a Director or
Senior Manager is set out in Schedule 1
to this Target Company Statement.
(b) Schedule 4 sets out the name of every
related company of CDLHH NZ, in
which MCK holds or controls equity
securities of any class, together with the
number, designation and percentage of
equity securities of that class of equity
securities. Because MCK is a related
company of CDLHH NZ, this means that
all of MCK’s subsidiaries are also related
companies of CDLHH NZ. Accordingly, all
of the companies set out in Schedule 4
(other than MCK itself) are MCK’s
subsidiaries. In addition, because
CDLHH NZ (an associate of Directors
Eik Sheng Kwek and Kevin Hangchi)
controls MCK, it too will control the
equity securities set out Schedule 4
to this Target Company Statement.
8.3 Other than as set out in Schedules 1, 3 and 4,
neither MCK nor any of the Directors, Senior
Managers or their associates holds or controls
any equity securities of CDLHH NZ or any
related company of CDLHH NZ.
9. Trading in equity securities of CDLHH
NZ and its related companies
Other than the Ordinary Shares acquired
by CDLHH NZ in MCK set out in Schedule 2
(because CDLHH NZ is an associate of Directors
Eik Sheng Kwek and Kevin Hangchi), neither
MCK, nor any Director, Senior Manager or any
of their associates has acquired or disposed
of any equity securities of CDLHH NZ or any
related company of CDLHH NZ during the
six-month period before 20 February 2025
(being the latest practicable date before the
date of this Target Company Statement).
10. Arrangements between
CDLHH NZ and MCK
10.1 On 31 January 2025, CDLHH NZ agreed
with a request from MCK that if CDLHH NZ
should decide to proceed with a takeover
offer, CDLHH NZ would not make that offer
before 10 February 2025. This was intended
to allow MCK to release its annual results
for the 2024 financial year prior to MCK
releasing the Target Company Statement.
10.2 The Offer Document states that CDLHH NZ
is providing funding for the acquisition
by way of intercompany loan from its sole
shareholder (First 2000 Limited) and/or
its upstream parent company (Millennium
& Copthorne Hotels Limited) which are
also holding companies of MCK. The Offer
Document also states that the amount of the
loan is yet to be determined as the lender
will lend such amount as may be required
to undertake the Offer. The Offer Document
further states that there are no formal loan
terms because the loan is from a holding
SECTION 2: TAKEOVERS
CODE DISCLOSURES
(CONTINUED)
23
company to its (direct or indirect) subsidiary.
In its Offer Document, CDLHH NZ has indicated
that, although there are not currently any
arrangements to do so, because MCK and its
subsidiaries are also subsidiaries of CDLHH
NZ, MCK and its subsidiaries may be required
to provide financial assistance to that
lender, presumably if the Offer is declared
unconditional and CDLHH NZ acquires 100%
of the Ordinary Shares.
10.3 Other than as set out in paragraphs 10.1 and
10.2 above, no agreements or arrangements
(whether legally enforceable or not) have been
made, or are proposed to be made, between
CDLHH NZ or any associates of CDLHH NZ,
and MCK or any related company of MCK,
in connection with, in anticipation of, or in
response to, the Offer.
11. Relationship between
CDLHH NZ and Directors and
Senior Managers of MCK
11.1 Except as set out in paragraph 11.2 below,
no agreement or arrangement (whether
legally enforceable or not) has been made,
or is proposed to be made, between CDLHH
NZ and any associates of CDLHH NZ, and any
Director or Senior Manager or any related
company of MCK (including particulars of any
payment or other benefit proposed to be made
or given by way of compensation for loss of
office, or as to their remaining in or retiring
from office) in connection with, in anticipation
of, or in response to the Offer.
11
11.2 Because of CDLHH NZ’s majority shareholding
in MCK, MCK is a related company of CDLHH
NZ and therefore an associate of CDLHH
NZ for the purposes of the Takeovers Code.
Accordingly, the following disclosure relates
to an agreement between MCK (as an associate
of CDLHH NZ) and three Directors. The
independent directors of MCK (being Leslie
Preston, Colin Sim and Graham McKenzie)
have arrangements with MCK whereby they
will each be paid an initial fee of $30,000 for
the work they carry out in connection with the
takeover notice or Offer. If the circumstances
justify the fee being increased, MCK may
review the fee.
11.3 Except as set out in paragraph 11.4 below,
and at Schedule 5 of this Target Company
Statement, no Directors or Senior Managers of
MCK are also directors or senior managers of
CDLHH NZ, or a related company of CDLHH NZ.
11.4 As noted in paragraph 11.2 above, CDLHH NZ
and MCK are related companies. Therefore,
each of the Directors (as listed in paragraph 4)
and Senior Managers (as listed in footnote 1
on page 7) are automatically also directors
and senior managers (as applicable) of a
related company of CDLHH NZ (being MCK).
In addition, Schedule 5 of this Target Company
Statement sets out the Directors or Senior
Managers of MCK that are also a director or
senior manager of related companies of
CDLHH NZ (other than MCK).
12. Agreement between MCK, and
Directors and Senior Managers
12.1 No agreement or arrangement (whether
legally enforceable or not) has been made,
or is proposed to be made, between MCK
or any related company of MCK, and any of
the Directors or Senior Managers or their
associates of MCK or its related companies,
under which a payment or other benefit may
be made or given by way of compensation
for loss of office, or as to their remaining in
or retiring from office in connection with, in
anticipation of, or in response to, the Offer.
11. This information is based on responses to questionnaires circulated to
the Directors and Senior Managers by MCK after receipt of CDLHH NZ’s
Takeover Notice.
SECTION 2: TAKEOVERS CODE DISCLOSURES
SECTION 2: TAKEOVERS CODE DISCLOSURES
24MILLENNIUM & COPTHORNE HOTELS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED | TARGET COMPANY STATEMENT 2025
13. Interests of Directors and Senior
Managers of MCK in contracts of
CDLHH NZ or its related companies
13.1 Except as set out in paragraph 13.2 below,
no Director or Senior Manager or any of their
associates has an interest in any contract to
which CDLHH NZ, or any related company of
CDLHH NZ, is a party.
12
13.2 As explained in paragraph 8.2, CDLHH NZ and
MCK are related companies. Accordingly, the
following disclosures are made regarding
contractual arrangements to which MCK
or MCK’s subsidiary Hospitality Services
Limited (being related companies of CDLHH
NZ) is a party and in which the Directors or
Senior Managers have interests. Each of the
Directors and Senior Managers are employed
or engaged by MCK or, in the case of the
Senior Managers other than MCK’s Managing
Director Stuart Harrison, Hospitality Services
Limited and, accordingly, have interests in
the contracts relating to their employment or
engagement. The contracts of employment
or engagement for each of the Directors
and Senior Managers were entered into in
the ordinary course of MCK’s business and
are on usual terms and conditions, including
as to monetary compensation.
13A. Interests of MCK’s substantial
security holders in material contracts
of CDLHH NZ or its related companies
13A.1 Except for the potential funding arrangement
described in paragraph 10.2, no person who,
to the knowledge of the Directors or the
Senior Managers holds or controls 5% or more
of any class of equity securities of MCK has
an interest in any material contract to which
CDLHH NZ, or any related company of CDLHH
NZ, is a party.
14. Additional information
14.1 In the opinion of the Directors, no additional
information, to the knowledge of MCK is
required to make the information in the
Offer Document correct or not misleading.
15. Recommendation
15.1 The Board has appointed a committee of
independent directors (the Independent
Committee) to attend to all matters
associated with the Offer. The Independent
Committee comprises Leslie Preston (Chair),
Colin Sim and Graham McKenzie.
15.2 The Independent Committee has carefully
considered a full range of expert advice
available to them (including Northington
Partners Limited’s Independent Adviser’s
Report on the merits of the Offer) and
unanimously recommend that holders of
Ordinary Shares do not accept that Offer for
the reasons set out in the Letter from the Chair
of the Independent Directors and Section 1
(Independent Directors’ Recommendation)
earlier in this Target Company Statement.
15.3 Kevin Hangchi and Eik Sheng Kwek, as
associates of CDLHH NZ, have a conflict
of interest in respect of the Offer. For this
reason, they abstain from making any
recommendation as to whether to accept
or reject the Offer.
15.4 Mr Stuart Harrison, being the Managing
Director of MCK, has a potential conflict of
interest in respect of the Offer because of
his executive role with MCK. For this reason,
Mr Harrison also abstains from making any
recommendation as to whether to accept or
reject the Offer.
SECTION 2: TAKEOVERS
CODE DISCLOSURES
(CONTINUED)
12. This information is based on responses to questionnaires circulated to
the Directors and Senior Managers by MCK after receipt of CDLHH NZ’s
Takeover Notice.
25
16. Actions of MCK
16.1 There are no material agreements or
arrangements (whether legally enforceable
or not) of MCK or any related company of
MCK entered into as a consequence of, in
response to, or in connection with, the Offer.
16.2 There are no negotiations underway as
a consequence of, in response to, or in
connection with the Offer that relate to,
or could result in:
(a) an extraordinary transaction, such
as a merger, amalgamation or
reorganisation, involving MCK or
any of its related companies; or
(b) the acquisition or disposition of
material assets by MCK or any of
its related companies; or
(c) an acquisition of equity securities by, or
of, MCK or any related company MCK; or
(d) any material change in the issued equity
securities of MCK, or the policy of the
Board relating to distributions, of MCK.
16.3 As at the date of this Target Company
Statement, there are no discussions or
negotiations underway between MCK and
any other party in respect of a competing
takeover offer or any other similar transaction.
The Independent Committee does not
anticipate any discussions or negotiations
of this nature during the Offer period.
17. Equity securities of MCK
17.1 As at the date of this Target Company
Statement, MCK has 105,478,743 Ordinary
Shares on issue (excluding the 99,547
Ordinary Shares held as treasury stock).
These are all fully paid.
17.2 MCK has no options, or rights to acquire
equity securities, on issue.
17.3 Subject to the NZX Listing Rules and MCK’s
constitution, Shareholders have in respect of
each Ordinary Share:
(a) subject to the rights of holders of any
shares or other equity securities which
confer special rights as to dividends,
the right to an equal share in dividends
authorised by the Board;
(b) subject to the rights of holders of any
shares or other equity securities which
confer special rights as to distributions,
the right to an equal share in the
distribution of surplus assets on
liquidation of MCK; and
(c) the right to cast one vote on a show of
hands or the right to cast one vote on a
poll (for each share held), at a meeting
of shareholders on any resolution,
including a resolution to:
(i) appoint or remove a director or
auditor;
(ii) alter MCK’s constitution;
(iii) approve a major transaction by
MCK;
(iv) approve an amalgamation
involving MCK (other than an
amalgamation of a wholly
owned subsidiary); and
(v) put MCK into liquidation.
SECTION 2: TAKEOVERS CODE DISCLOSURES
SECTION 2: TAKEOVERS CODE DISCLOSURES
26MILLENNIUM & COPTHORNE HOTELS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED | TARGET COMPANY STATEMENT 2025
17.4 In addition to the Ordinary Shares, MCK has
52,739,543 fully paid Preference Shares on
issue however these are not equity securities
for the purposes of the Takeovers Code, and
do not form part of the Offer. The Preference
Shares are non-voting and rank equally
with the Ordinary Shares with respect to all
distributions made by MCK (including without
limitation, to dividend payments) except
for any distribution made in the context
of a liquidation. MCK may, in its discretion,
subject to the approval of the holders of the
Preference Shares by way of special resolution,
redeem the Preference Shares, in whole or
in part (on a pro rata basis). The terms upon
which the Preference Shares are issued is set
out in the simplified disclosure prospectus
issued by MCK on 17 February 2014.
18. Financial information
18.1 On 24 February 2025, MCK released its
financial results for the twelve months ended
31 December 2024, which included audited
financial statements for that period. A copy
of the audited financial statements, media
release and investor presentation can be
found at https://www.nzx.com/companies/
MCK/announcements?year=2025 or at MCK’s
investor website at https://mckhotels.co.nz/
investors/nzx-announcements/.
18.2 A copy of MCK’s most recent annual report
(being the annual report for the period
ended 31 December 2023) is available on
MCK’s website at https://mckhotels.co.nz/
investors/annual-reports-mck/.
18.3 Each person to whom the Offer is made may
also request a non-electronic copy of that
annual report from MCK by making a written
request to enquiries@mckhotels.co.nz or,
alternatively, by making a written request
to Computershare Investor Services Limited
(enquiry@computershare.co.nz).
18.4 MCK’s most recent half-yearly report since
its annual report for the year ended 31
December 2023 (being the half-yearly report
for the six months ended 30 June 2024)
is available on MCK’s website at https://
mckhotels.co.nz/investors/mck-2018-2013/.
No interim report has been issued since the
issue of the half yearly report for the six
months ended 30 June 2024.
18.5 There have been the following material
changes in the financial or trading position,
or prospects, of MCK, since its 31 December
2023 annual report:
(a) As mentioned in paragraph 18.1
above, on 24 February 2025 MCK
released its financial results for the
twelve months ended 31 December
2024. Those results included the
following material changes in the
financial and trading position of MCK:
(i) a 21% increase in revenue to
$176.2 million from the position
for the financial year which
ended 31 December 2023 (the
previous financial year), MCK’s
highest revenue figure in five
years, and a 32.1% increase in
operating profit to $42.5 million;
(ii) a 25.6% increase in profit before
tax to $47.1 million compared to
the position under the previous
financial year;
(iii) a profit after tax of $2.8 million
for the twelve months ended
31 December 2024, reflecting
the deferred tax adjustment
which was reported in the
interim results. Excluding this
adjustment, the profit after tax
attributed to MCK shareholders
would have been $27.2 million;
SECTION 2: TAKEOVERS
CODE DISCLOSURES
(CONTINUED)
27
(iv) total assets as at 31 December
2024 at book value of $762.3
million; and
(v) a final dividend in respect of
the 2024 financial year was not
declared due to the conditions
of the Offer, which do not allow a
dividend to be paid or declared.
(b) On 23 October 2024, MCK announced
that it had entered into an agreement
to acquire The Mayfair Hotel in
Christchurch. This hotel comprises
67 guest rooms and suites and has a
cocktail bar, conference and meeting
facilities and a café and kitchen.
The purchase price was $31.9 million
plus GST and MCK used its existing
cash resources and bank facilities
to complete the acquisition. This
transaction settled on 22 January 2025.
(c) On 7 August 2024, MCK announced
its financial results for the six months
ended 30 June 2024. Those results
included the unaudited financial
statements for that period and
included the following material
changes in the financial and trading
position and prospects of MCK:
(i) revenue growth of 42% to
$85.32 million and an increase
in net profit before tax of 88% to
$21.53 million compared to the
same period the previous year.
The first half of the financial
year was the first time in five
years where the hotels have
been able to operate without the
impact of pandemic restrictions,
weather-related issues or
large staffing shortages;
(ii) a rise in hotel occupancy to 69.0%
(compared to 59.8% in the same
period the previous year). MCK
was able to show improving
occupancy and profit in the hotels
business, despite a slowdown in
demand for corporate travel and
meetings;
(iii) a one-off, non-cash deferred tax
liability adjustment of $25.76
million, which arose from a change
in tax legislation that came into
effect earlier in 2024. This related
to the depreciation of buildings
owned by MCK; and
(iv) as a result of the adjustment,
which did not affect MCK’s
trading position or cash flow, MCK
recorded an after-tax loss for the
period of $10.17 million.
(d) On 1 August 2024, MCK advised that
changes to tax legislation which removed
the ability to claim tax depreciation
on commercial buildings would result
in a one-off, non-cash deferred tax
liability adjustment of approximately
$26 million. This arose from a change in
tax legislation that came into effect in
2024 and relates to the depreciation of
buildings owned by MCK. MCK noted that
the adjustment would have no impact on
MCK’s trading profitability or cash flows.
(e) On 26 April 2024, MCK announced that it
had reached conditional agreement with
the Whangarei District Council
for the purchase of land in Whangarei’s
CBD for the development of a hotel.
The purchase price was $2.24 million, and
the acquisition was conditional
on due diligence. The transaction settled
on 29 August 2024 and MCK used
existing cash on hand to settle
the purchase.
SECTION 2: TAKEOVERS CODE DISCLOSURES
SECTION 2: TAKEOVERS CODE DISCLOSURES
28MILLENNIUM & COPTHORNE HOTELS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED | TARGET COMPANY STATEMENT 2025
18.6 Other than as set out elsewhere in this
Target Company Statement, or as contained
in the Independent Adviser’s Report:
(a) there have been no known material
changes in the financial or trading
position, or prospects, of MCK since the
31 December 2023 annual report; and
(b) there is no other information about
the assets, liabilities, profitability
and financial affairs of MCK that
could reasonably be expected to be
material to the making of a decision
by Shareholders to accept or reject
the Offer.
19. Independent advice
on merits of Offer
Northington Partners Limited is the
independent adviser who has provided a
report under Rule 21 of the Takeovers
Code on the merits of the Offer. A copy of
Northington Partners Limited’s Independent
Adviser’s Report is attached as the Appendix
to this Target Company Statement.
20. Asset valuations
20.1 Except as set out in paragraph 20.2, this
Target Company Statement does not refer
to a valuation of any asset of MCK.
20.2 The Independent Adviser’s Report refers
to the valuation of certain property assets
of MCK (as set out on pages 23 and 41 of
the Independent Adviser’s Report). Copies
of those valuation reports are available for
inspection at Floor 7, 23 Customs Street East,
Auckland Central, Auckland. Alternatively, a
copy of any such valuation reports will be sent
to any offeree by making such a request to
enquiries@mckhotels.co.nz. As part of making
such a report available to an offeree, that
offeree may first be required to sign a hold
harmless letter in favour of the author of
the relevant report.
20.3 The Takeovers Panel has granted an
exemption to permit certain commercially
sensitive information to be redacted from
those valuation reports.
21. Prospective financial information
21.1 The Independent Adviser’s Report contains
prospective financial information in relation to
MCK. The principal assumptions on which the
prospective financial information is based are
set out in the Independent Adviser’s Report.
21.2 Other than the prospective financial
information referred to in paragraph 21.1
above, this Target Company Statement does
not refer to any other prospective financial
information about MCK.
22. Sales of unquoted equity
securities under Offer
22.1 There are no unquoted equity securities
that are subject of the Offer.
23. Market prices for quoted equity
securities under Offer
23.1 The Ordinary Shares are quoted on the
NZX Main Board.
23.2 The closing price on the NZX Main Board
of the Ordinary Shares on:
(a) 20 February 2025, being the latest
practicable working day before the
date on which this Target Company
Statement is sent to Shareholders,
was NZ$2.40; and
(b) 17 January 2025, being the last
day on which the NZX was open for
business before the date on which
MCK received CDLHH NZ’s takeover
notice, was NZ$1.80.
SECTION 2: TAKEOVERS
CODE DISCLOSURES
(CONTINUED)
29SECTION 2: TAKEOVERS CODE DISCLOSURES
23.3 The highest and lowest closing market prices
of the Ordinary Shares on the NZX Main Board
(and the relevant dates) during the six months
before the Notice Date, were as follows:
(a) the highest closing market price was
NZ$1.90 (on 23 December 2024); and
(b) the lowest closing market price was
NZ$1.66 (on 4 October 2024).
23.4 During the six-month period before the Notice
Date, MCK did not issue any equity securities
or make any changes to any equity securities
on issue which could have affected the market
prices of Ordinary Shares referred to above.
23.5 There is no other information about the
market price of the Ordinary Shares that would
reasonably be expected to be material to the
making of a decision by Shareholders to accept
or reject the Offer.
24. Other information
24.1 The following information is considered
by the Directors to be information that
could reasonably be expected to be
material to the making of a decision by
holders of Ordinary Shares as to whether
to accept or reject the Offer, and the
timing of the giving of any acceptance:
(a) the terms of the Offer state that,
once given, acceptances may not
be withdrawn by acceptors unless
CDLHH NZ fails to pay acceptors in
accordance with the Takeovers Code;
(b) if CDLHH NZ increases the price of
the Offer, CDLHH NZ must provide
the increased price to all holders of
Ordinary Shares whose shares are
acquired under the Offer, whether or
not the shareholder accepted the
Offer before or after the price was
increased; and
(c) payment for Ordinary Shares in respect
of which the Offer is accepted will
only be made by CDLHH NZ within five
working days of the later of the date
on which the relevant acceptance is
received, the date on which the Offer
becomes unconditional or 8 May 2025.
Early acceptance of the Offer will
therefore not result in payment being
made any earlier than the later date
described above.
25. Approval of this Target
Company Statement
25.1 The contents of this Target Company
Statement have been approved by the
Independent Directors of MCK
(Leslie Preston, Colin Sim and Graham
McKenzie), who have been delegated
with authority by the Directors to do so.
25.2 As disclosed in paragraph 15, Eik Sheng Kwek
and Kevin Hangchi have a conflict of interest
in respect of the Offer and Stuart Harrison has
a potential conflict of interest in respect of
the Offer. As a result, they have not formally
approved this Target Company Statement.
13
26. Interpretation
26.1 In this Target Company Statement:
Board means the board of directors of MCK;
CDI means CDL Investments New Zealand
Limited, MCK’s 65% owned subsidiary;
CDLHH NZ means CDL Hotels Holdings New
Zealand Limited;
Directors means the directors of MCK;
SECTION 2: TAKEOVERS CODE DISCLOSURES
13. Mr Stuart Harrison, who is MCK’s Managing Director, has signed this
Target Company Statement in his capacity as Chief Executive Officer
of MCK only, as required by the Takeovers Code.
30MILLENNIUM & COPTHORNE HOTELS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED | TARGET COMPANY STATEMENT 2025
Independent Adviser’s Report means the
independent adviser’s report provided by
Northington Partners Limited under Rule 21 of
the Takeovers Code and set out in the Appendix
to this Target Company Statement;
Independent Committee has the meaning
given to that term in paragraph 15.1 of
section 2 of this Target Company Statement;
Independent Directors means Colin Sim,
Leslie Preston and Graham McKenzie;
MCK means Millennium & Copthorne Hotels
New Zealand Limited;
Notice Date means 20 January 2025;
NZ$ or $ means New Zealand dollars;
NZX means NZX Limited;
NZX Main Board means the main board equity
securities exchange operated by NZX;
Offer has the meaning given to that term
in paragraph 2.1 of section 2 of this Target
Company Statement;
Offer Document has the meaning given
to that term paragraph 2.2 of section 2 of
this Target Company Statement;
Ordinary Shares means ordinary shares
in MCK;
Preference Shares has the meaning given
to that term in paragraph 2.3 of section 2
of this Target Company Statement;
RPS Offer has the meaning given to that
term in paragraph 2.3 of section 2 of this
Target Company Statement;
Senior Manager has the meaning given to
that term in paragraph 5.3 of section 2 of
this Target Company Statement;
Shareholders means the holders of Ordinary
Shares which are the subject of the Offer
by CDLHH NZ;
Takeover s Ac t means the Takeovers Act
1993; and
Takeover s Code means the Takeovers Code
approved by the Takeovers Code Approval
Order 2000 (as amended).
26.2 Words and expressions defined in the
Takeovers Act or the Takeovers Code and not
otherwise defined in this Target Company
Statement have the same meaning when
used in this Target Company Statement.
27. Certificate
To the best of our knowledge and belief,
after making proper enquiry, the information
contained in or accompanying this Target
Company Statement is, in all material respects,
true and correct and not misleading, whether
by omission of any information or otherwise,
and includes all the information required to be
disclosed by MCK under the Takeovers Code.
Signed by:
SECTION 2: TAKEOVERS
CODE DISCLOSURES
(CONTINUED)
Leslie Preston
Director of MCK
Stuart Harrison
Chief Executive
Officer of MCK
Colin Sim
Director of MCK
Anand Rambhai
Chief Financial
Officer of MCK
31SECTION 2: TAKEOVERS CODE DISCLOSURES
SECTION 2: TAKEOVERS CODE DISCLOSURES
THIS PAGE HAS INTENTIONALLY BEEN LEFT BLANK
32MILLENNIUM & COPTHORNE HOTELS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED | TARGET COMPANY STATEMENT 202532MILLENNIUM & COPTHORNE HOTELS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED | TARGET COMPANY STATEMENT 2025
3333
SCHEDULES 1–5
Left: Fine dining at the award winning One80 Restaurant
at Copthorne Hotel Wellington Oriental Bay.
SCHEDULES 1–5
34MILLENNIUM & COPTHORNE HOTELS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED | TARGET COMPANY STATEMENT 2025
SCHEDULES 1–5
Schedule 1: Ordinary Shares owned by Directors, Senior
Managers and their associates (paragraph 5.3)
Notes:
1. This information is taken from responses to questionnaires circulated to the Directors and Senior Managers by MCK after receipt of CDLHH NZ’s Takeover Notice.
2. City Developments Limited is the ultimate holding company of CDLHH NZ. It ultimately controls the Ordinary Shares held by CDLHH NZ, through the following
wholly-owned subsidiaries: Singapura Developments (Private) Limited, Agapier Investments Limited, Reach Across International Limited, Millennium &
Copthorne Hotels Limited, M&C Asia Holdings (UK) Limited, M&C Hospitality Holdings (Asia) Limited, M&C Hotel Enterprises (Asia) Limited, Hong Leong Hotels
Pte. Ltd. and First 2000 Limited.
3. The percentage numbers are rounded to two decimal places.
NameDescription
Number of Ordinary
Shares held or controlled
Percentage of class
CDL Hotels Holdings
New Zealand Limited
Associate of a Director
(Eik Sheng Kwek and Kevin Hangchi)
80,017,014
75.86% (excluding
treasury stock)
City Developments Limited
Associate of a Director
(Eik Sheng Kwek and Kevin Hangchi)
80,017,014
75.86% (excluding
treasury stock)
Nathan KrugerSenior Manager134.800.00%
Schedule 2: Trading in equity securities in MCK (paragraph 6)
Notes:
1. This information is based on (i) responses to questionnaires circulated to the Directors and Senior Managers by MCK after receipt of CDLHH NZ’s Takeover Notice
and (ii) substantial product holder notices filed with NZX.
Name
Disposal or
acquisition
Number of equity
securities acquired or
disposed of
Designation of
equity security
Date
Consideration per
equity security
CDL Hotels Holdings
New Zealand Limited
Acquisition5,273,937Ordinary shares 29 October 2024$1.73
Schedule 3: Ownership of equity securities of CDLHH NZ and its related companies
(other than MCK) – Directors, Senior Managers and their associates (paragraph 8.1)
Notes:
1. This information is taken from (i) responses to questionnaires circulated to the Directors and Senior Managers by MCK after receipt of CDLHH NZ’s Takeover
Notice (ii) New Zealand Companies Office records and (iii) information set out in Schedule 1 of the Offer Document.
2. City Developments Limited is the ultimate holding company of CDLHH NZ. It ultimately controls the shares in CDLHH NZ, through the following wholly-owned
subsidiaries: Singapura Developments (Private) Limited, Agapier Investments Limited, Reach Across International Limited, Millennium & Copthorne Hotels
Limited, M&C Asia Holdings (UK) Limited, M&C Hospitality Holdings (Asia) Limited, M&C Hotel Enterprises (Asia) Limited, Hong Leong Hotels Pte. Ltd. and First
2000 Limited.
3. The percentage numbers are rounded to two decimal places.
NameDescription
Company in which
securities are held or
controlled
Designation of
equity security
Number of equity
securities held or
controlled
Percentage of total
number of equity
securities of class
First 2000 Limited
Associate of a
Director
(Eik Sheng Kwek
and Kevin Hangchi)
CDL Hotels Holdings
New Zealand Limited
– shares held
Ordinary Shares54,221100%
City Developments
Limited
Associate of
a Director
(Eik Sheng Kwek
and Kevin Hangchi)
CDL Hotels Holdings
New Zealand Limited
– shares controlled
Ordinary Shares54,221100%
Kevin HangchiDirector
City Developments
Limited
Ordinary Shares50,0000.01%
Kevin HangchiDirector
City Developments
Limited
Preference Shares24,0600.01%
Kevin HangchiDirector
Hong Leong Investment
Holdings PTE Limited
Ordinary Shares5180.37%
SNB Harrison
Family Trust
Associate of
a Director
(Stuart Harrison)
CDL Investments
New Zealand Limited
Ordinary Shares21,0060.00%
35
Schedule 4: Ownership of equity securities of CDLHH NZ
and its related companies – MCK (paragraph 8.2)
Company in which equity securities are
held or controlled
Designation of equity security
Number of equity
securities held or
controlled
Percentage of total
number of equity
securities of class
CDL Investments
New Zealand Limited
Ordinary Shares190,591,29765.31%
Millennium & Copthorne NZ LimitedOrdinary Shares100100.00%
CDL Land New Zealand LimitedOrdinary Shares1,008,60065.31%
All Seasons Hotels
and Resorts Limited
Ordinary Shares100100.00%
Context Securities LimitedOrdinary Shares11,364100.00%
KIN Holdings LimitedRedeemable Preference Shares4,268,708100.00%
KIN Holdings LimitedOrdinary Shares1000100.00%
Kingsgate International Corporation LimitedOrdinary Shares61,128,784100.00%
Kingsgate Hotels LimitedOrdinary Shares100100.00%
Quantum LimitedOrdinary Shares40,833,818100.00%
Hospitality Group LimitedOrdinary Shares69,999,172100.00%
Hospitality Leases LimitedOrdinary Shares27,130,654100.00%
Hospitality Services LimitedOrdinary Shares3,000,002100.00%
Mayfair Luxury Hotels LimitedOrdinary Shares17,623100.00%
MCKOrdinary Shares99,5470.00%
QINZ (Anzac Avenue) Limited
Non-participating Redeemable Preference
shares
23,783,196100.00%
QINZ (Anzac Avenue) LimitedOrdinary Shares100100.00%
Kingsgate Hotels and Resorts LimitedOrdinary Shares100100.00%
Kingsgate Holdings Pty LimitedOrdinary Shares5,300,002100.00%
Kingsgate Hotel Pty LimitedOrdinary Shares2100.00%
Kingsgate Investments Pty LimitedOrdinary Shares35,000,002100.00%
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels Pty LimitedOrdinary Shares10100.00%
Hotelcorp New Zealand Pty LimitedOrdinary Shares25,191,867100.00%
Marquee Brisbane Hotel Pty LimitedOrdinary Shares150.00%
Marquee Brisbane Hotel Pty 2 LimitedOrdinary Shares150.00%
Marquee Hotel Holdings Pty LimitedOrdinary Shares250.00%
Marquee Hotel Operations Pty LimitedOrdinary Shares150.00%
Notes:
1. This information is taken from (i) responses to questionnaires circulated to the Directors and Senior Managers
by MCK after receipt of CDLHH NZ’s Takeover Notice or (ii) which was otherwise provided by MCK management.
2. MCK holds the 99,547 Ordinary Shares in MCK as treasury stock.
3. The percentage numbers are rounded to two decimal places.
SCHEDULES 1–5
SCHEDULES 1–5
36MILLENNIUM & COPTHORNE HOTELS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED | TARGET COMPANY STATEMENT 2025
Part A – Kevin Hangchi (Director of MCK)
Name of entityPosition
CDLHH NZDirector
KIN Holdings LimitedDirector
SCHEDULES 1–5 (CONTINUED)
Name of entityPosition
KIN Holdings LimitedDirector
Quantum LimitedDirector
All Seasons Hotels and Resorts LtdDirector
Context Securities LimitedDirector
Kingsgate Hotels LimitedDirector
Kingsgate International Corporation LimitedDirector
Hospitality Group LimitedDirector
Mayfair Luxury Hotels LimitedDirector
Kingsgate Hotels and Resorts LimitedDirector
QINZ (Anzac Avenue) LimitedDirector
Hospitality Leases LimitedDirector
Hospitality Services LimitedDirector
Millennium & Copthorne NZ LimitedDirector
Part B – Stuart Harrison (Director of MCK)
Name of entityPosition
CDL Land New Zealand LimitedDirector
Hospitality Services LimitedSenior Manager
Part C – Takeshi Ito (Senior Manager of MCK)
Name of entityPosition
Quantum LimitedDirector
Millennium & Copthorne NZ LimitedDirector
All Seasons Hotels and Resorts LimitedDirector
Context Securities LimitedDirector
Mayfair Luxury Hotels LimitedDirector
Kingsgate Hotels and Resorts LimitedDirector
QINZ (Anzac Avenue) LimitedDirector
Kingsgate Hotels LimitedDirector
Hospitality Leases LimitedDirector
Hospitality Services LimitedDirector
Kingsgate International Corporation LimitedDirector
Kingsgate Holdings Pty LimitedDirector
Kingsgate Investments Pty LimitedDirector
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels Pty LimitedDirector
Hotelcorp New Zealand Pty LimitedDirector
Hospitality Services LimitedSenior Manager
Part D – Anand Rambhai (Senior Manager of MCK)
Part E – Kenneth Orr (Senior Manager of MCK)
Name of entityPosition
Quantum LimitedDirector
Hospitality Group LimitedDirector
Hospitality Services LimitedDirector
Part F – Louise Borton (Senior Manager of MCK)
Name of entityPosition
Hospitality Services LimitedSenior Manager
Part G – Brendan Davies (Senior Manager of MCK)
Name of entityPosition
Hospitality Services LimitedSenior Manager
Schedule 5: Directors and Senior Managers’
roles in related companies of CDLHH NZ
Part H – Nathan Kruger (Senior Manager of MCK)
Name of entityPosition
Hospitality Services LimitedSenior Manager
Part I – Lisa Maclean (Senior Manager of MCK)
Name of entityPosition
Hospitality Services LimitedSenior Manager
Part J – Josie Wilson (Senior Manager of MCK)
Name of entityPosition
Hospitality Services LimitedSenior Manager
Part K – Melanie Beattie (Senior Manager of MCK)
Name of entityPosition
Hospitality Services LimitedSenior Manager
Part L – Eik Sheng Kwek (Director of MCK)
Name of entityPosition
125 OBS (Nominees 1) LimitedDirector
125 OBS (Nominees 2) LimitedDirector
125 OBS GP LimitedDirector
58 High Street Pty LtdDirector
Actas Holdings Pte. Ltd.Director
Adelanto Investments Pte. Ltd.Director
Allinvest Holding Pte LtdDirector
Allsgate Properties LimitedDirector
Alphagate Holdings LimitedDirector
Androgate Properties LimitedDirector
Aquarius Properties Pte. Ltd.Director
Archyield LimitedDirector
Ascent View Holdings Pte. Ltd.Director
Aster Land Development Pte LtdDirector
Aston Properties Pte LtdDirector
Atlasgate SG Holdings Pte. Ltd.Director
Atlasgate UK Holdings LimitedDirector
Atlasgate UK Properties LimitedDirector
ATOS Holding GmbHDirector
Baynes Investments Pte LtdDirector
Beaumont Properties LimitedDirector
Beijing Fortune Hotel Co., Ltd.Director
Bellevue Properties Pte. Ltd.Director
Bestro Holdings LimitedDirector
Bloomshine Holdings LimitedDirector
37
BOP Luxembourg (125 OBS) 2 S.à r.l.Director
Branbury Investments LtdDirector
Bravogate Holdings S.à r.l.Director
Bridge North LimitedDirector
Camborne Developments Pte LtdDirector
Canterbury Riverside OpCo LimitedDirector
Canterbury Riverside Propco LimitedDirector
Canvey Developments Pte. Ltd.Director
CDL Ace Pte. Ltd.Director
CDL Acquisitions Pte. Ltd.Director
CDL Aquila Pte. Ltd.Director
CDL Australia Holdings Pty LtdDirector
CDL Centroid Pte. Ltd.Director
CDL CityInd Pte. Ltd.Director
CDL Cityscape Pte. Ltd.Director
CDL Commercial REIT Management Pte. Ltd.Director
CDL Conservo Pte. Ltd.Director
CDL Constellation Pte. Ltd.Director
CDL Crestview Holdings Pte. Ltd.Director
CDL Crown REIT Management Pte. Ltd.Director
CDL Entertainment & Leisure Pte LtdDirector
CDL Evergreen Pte. Ltd.Director
CDL Galliard Grand GP LimitedDirector
CDLHH NZDirector
CDL Hotels (Chelsea) LimitedDirector
CDL Hotels (Korea) Ltd.Director
CDL Hotels (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd.Director
CDL Hotels (U.K.) LimitedDirector
CDL Hotels Australia Holdings (SG) Pte. Ltd.Director
CDL Hotels Australia Holdings Pty LtdDirector
CDL Hotels Japan Pte. Ltd.Director
CDL Infinity Pte. Ltd.Director
CDL Investments New Zealand LimitedDirector
CDL Kingtse Pte. Ltd.Director
CDL Land Pte LtdDirector
CDL Libra Commercial Pte. Ltd.Director
CDL Libra Pte. Ltd.Director
CDL Management Services Pte. Ltd.Director
CDL Netherlands Investments B.V.Director
CDL Pavona Pte. Ltd.Director
CDL Pegasus Pte. Ltd.Director
CDL Perseus Pte. Ltd.Director
CDL Pisces Commercial Pte. Ltd.Director
CDL Pisces Serviced Residences Pte. Ltd.Director
CDL Pro Star Development Pty LtdDirector
CDL Properties B.V.Director
CDL Queensray Pte. Ltd.Director
CDL Real Estate Asset Managers Pte. Ltd.Director
CDL Real Estate Investment Managers Pte. Ltd.Director
CDL Regulus Pte. Ltd.Director
CDL Sakura Pte. Ltd.Director
CDL Shanghai Holdings Pte. Ltd.Director
CDL-Suzhou Investment Pte LtdDirector
Central Mall Pte LtdDirector
Centro Investment Holding Pte. Ltd.Director
Centro Property Holding Pte. Ltd.Director
Chalon Heritage Hotel Holdings SASSenior Manager
Chalon Haritage Hotel SNCSenior Manager
Chania Holdings LimitedDirector
Chestnut Avenue Developments Pte. Ltd.Director
City Apex Pte. Ltd.Director
City Bonsai Pte. Ltd.Director
City Boost Pte. Ltd.Director
City Century Pte. Ltd.Director
City Condominiums Pte LtdDirector
City Connected Communities Pte. Ltd.Director
City Delta Pte. Ltd.Director
City Developments Investments Pte. Ltd.Director
City Developments Realty LimitedDirector
City Elite Pte LtdDirector
City Gemini Pte. Ltd.Director
City Grand Investments LimitedDirector
City Hotels Pte. Ltd.Director
City Ikonik Pte. Ltd.Director
City Leo Pte. Ltd.Director
City Lux Pte. Ltd.Director
City Montage Pte. Ltd.Director
City Oasis Pte. Ltd.Director
City Orchard Pte. Ltd.Director
City Platinum Holdings Pte. Ltd.Director
City REIT Management Pte. Ltd.Director
City Resyde Pte. Ltd.Director
City Sceptre Investments Pte. Ltd.Director
City Serviced Offices Pte. Ltd.Director
City Sol Luna Holdings Pte. Ltd.Director
City Sol Pte. Ltd.Director
City Strategic Equity Pte. Ltd.Director
City Sunshine Holdings Pte. Ltd.Director
City Symphony Pte. Ltd.Director
City Thrive Pte. Ltd.Director
Citydev Real Estate (Singapore) Pte LtdDirector
Citydev Venture Holdings LimitedDirector
CityNexus (UK) LimitedDirector
CityNexus Pte. Ltd.Director
Cityview Place Holdings Pte. Ltd.Director
Cityzens Development Pte. Ltd.Director
Copthorne (Nominees) LimitedDirector
Copthorne Aberdeen LimitedDirector
Copthorne Hotel (Birmingham) LimitedDirector
Copthorne Hotel (Cardiff) LimitedDirector
Copthorne Hotel (Effingham Park) LimitedDirector
Copthorne Hotel (Gatwick) LimitedDirector
Copthorne Hotel (Manchester) LimitedDirector
Copthorne Hotel (Merry Hill) Construction LimitedDirector
Copthorne Hotel (Merry Hill) LimitedDirector
Copthorne Hotel (Newcastle) LimitedDirector
Copthorne Hotel (Plymouth) LimitedDirector
Copthorne Hotel (Slough) LimitedDirector
SCHEDULES 1–5
SCHEDULES 1–5
38MILLENNIUM & COPTHORNE HOTELS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED | TARGET COMPANY STATEMENT 2025
SCHEDULES 1–5 (CONTINUED)
Copthorne Hotel Holdings LimitedDirector
Copthorne Hotels LimitedDirector
Copthorne Orchid Hotel Singapore Pte LtdDirector
Copthorne Orchid Penang Sdn. Bhd.Director
Crescent View Developments Pte. Ltd.Director
Name of entityPosition
Delfi One Investments Pte. Ltd.Director
Delfi Three Investments Pte. Ltd.Director
Delfi Two Investments Pte. Ltd.Director
Diplomat Hotel Holding LimitedDirector
EastWest Portfolio Pte. Ltd.Director
Easy Thrive Ventures LimitedDirector
Educado Company LimitedDirector
Elite Hotel Management Services Pte. Ltd.Director
Ellinois Management Services Pte. Ltd.Director
Euroform (S) Pte. LimitedDirector
Fergurson Hotel Holdings LimitedDirector
Fergurson Investment Corp.Director
Finite Properties Investment LimitedDirector
First Platinum Holdings Pte. Ltd.Director
Five Star Assurance, Inc.Director
Freshview Developments Pte. Ltd.Director
Friars Road Manco LimitedDirector
GHL CDL Morden LimitedDirector
Glades Properties Pte. Ltd.Director
Grand Plaza Hotel Corporation*Director
Grande Strategic Pte. Ltd.Director
Grange 100 Pte. Ltd.Director
Granmil Holdings Pte LtdDirector
Greystand Holdings LimitedDirector
Guan Realty (Private) LimitedDirector
Harbour Land CorporationDirector
Harbour View Hotel Pte LtdDirector
Harrow Entertainment Pte LtdDirector
Heritage Pro International LimitedDirector
Highline Holdings LimitedDirector
Highline Investments GP LimitedDirector
Highline Properties GP LimitedDirector
Hoko Fitzroy Pty LtdDirector
Hoko Kenmore Pty LtdDirector
Hoko Macaulay Pty LtdDirector
Hoko Mina Pty LtdDirector
Hoko Spencer Pty LtdDirector
Hoko Toowong Pty LtdDirector
Hong Bee Hardware Company, Sdn. BerhadDirector
Hong Leong Enterprises Pte. Ltd.Director
Hong Leong FoundationDirector
Hong Leong Hotel Development LimitedDirector
Hong Leong International Hotel
(Singapore) Pte. Ltd.
Director
Hong Leong Properties Pte. LimitedDirector
Hospitality Holdings Pte. Ltd.Director
Hospitality Ventures Pte. Ltd.Director
Hotel Liverpool LimitedDirector
Hotel Liverpool Management LimitedDirector
HSRE Crosslane (Coventry) LimitedDirector
HSRE Crosslane (Leeds) LimitedDirector
Part L – Eik Sheng Kwek (Director of MCK) (continued)
HSU JV Holdco LimitedDirector
HThree City Jade Pte. Ltd.Director
Iconique Tokutei Mokuteki KaishaDirector
Infinity Properties LimitedDirector
Iselin LimitedDirector
Island Glades Developments Pte. Ltd.Director
Jayland Properties LimitedDirector
Keygate Holdings LimitedDirector
King's Tanglin Shopping Pte. Ltd.Director
Kwek Holdings Pte LtdDirector
Kwek Hong Png Investment Pte. Ltd.Director
Landco Properties LimitedDirector
Le Grove Management Pte LtdDirector
Legend Commercial Pte. Ltd.Director
Legend Commercial Trustee Pte. Ltd.Director
Legend Investment Holdings Pte. Ltd.Director
Legend Quay Pte. Ltd.Director
Lightspark Holdings Limited
(In Members' voluntary liquidation)
Director
Lingo Enterprises LimitedDirector
Lingo Enterprises Limited, Singapore BranchDirector
London Britannia Hotel LimitedDirector
London Tara Hotel LimitedDirector
Lukestone Properties LimitedDirector
M & C (CB) LimitedDirector
M & C (CD) LimitedDirector
M & C Finance (1) LimitedDirector
M & C Management Holdings LimitedDirector
M & C NZ LimitedDirector
M & C Reservations Services LimitedDirector
M&C Asia Finance (UK) LimitedDirector
M&C Asia Holdings (UK) LimitedDirector
M&C Business Trust Management Limited (as
trustee-manager of CDL Hospitality Business Trust
which is stapled together with CDL Hospitality Real
Estate Investment Trust as CDL Hospitality Trusts*)
Director
M&C Capital Pte. Ltd.Director
M&C Galiant Holdings LimitedDirector
M&C Holdings (Thailand) Ltd.Director
M&C Hotel Investments Pte. Ltd.Director
M&C Hotels France Management SARLSenior Manager
M&C Hotels France SASSenior Manager
M&C Hotels Holdings Japan Pte. Ltd.Director
M&C Hotels Holdings LimitedDirector
M&C Hotels Holdings USA LimitedDirector
M&C Hotels Japan Pte. Ltd.Director
M&C New York Finance (UK) LimitedDirector
M&C REIT Management Limited
(as manager of CDL Hospitality Real Estate
Investment Trust which is stapled together
with CDL Hospitality Business Trust as CDL
Hospitality Trusts*)
Director
M&C Restaurants (London) LimitedDirector
M&C Sakura Holdings Pte. Ltd.Director
M&C Sakura Hotel Pte. Ltd.Director
M&C Sakura TMKDirector
M&C Singapore Finance (UK) LimitedDirector
M&C Singapore Holdings (UK) LimitedDirector
M&C Sponsorship LimitedDirector
Marquee Brisbane Hotel Pty LimitedDirector
39
Marquee Brisbane Hotel 2 Pty LimitedDirector
Marquee Hotel Holdings Pty LimitedDirector
Max Office (SKD) General Partner LimitedDirector
Melvale Holdings LimitedDirector
Millennium & Copthorne
(Austrian Holdings) Limited
Director
Millennium & Copthorne (Jersey Holdings) LimitedDirector
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels LimitedDirector
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels Management
(Shanghai) Limited
Director
Millennium & Copthorne International LimitedDirector
Millennium & Copthorne Share Trustees LimitedDirector
Millennium Hotel Holdings EMEA LimitedDirector
Millennium Hotels & Resorts Services LimitedDirector
Millennium Hotels (West London) LimitedDirector
Millennium Hotels (West London) Management
Limited
Director
Millennium Hotels Europe Holdings LimitedDirector
Millennium Hotels Italy Holdings s.r.l.Director
Millennium Hotels LimitedDirector
Millennium Hotels London LimitedDirector
Millennium Hotels Palace Management s.r.l.Director
Millennium Hotels Property s.r.l.Director
Morden Wharf LimitedDirector
Mount V Development Pte. Ltd.
Alternate
Director
MPG St Katharine Finance LimitedDirector
MPG St Katharine GP LimitedDirector
MPG St Katharine LimitedDirector
MPG St Katharine LP LimitedDirector
MPG St Katharine Nominee LimitedDirector
MPG St Katharine Nominee Two LimitedDirector
New Bath Court (Opco) LimitedDirector
New Bath Court LimitedDirector
New Empire Investments Pte. Ltd.Director
New Unity Holdings Ltd.Director
New Vista Realty Pte. Ltd.Director
Newbury Investments Pte LtdDirector
Newmarket Property Holdings LimitedDirector
Northgate Investments LimitedDirector
Novel Developments Pte. Ltd.Director
Palmerston Holdings Sdn. Bhd.Director
Paradise Investments LimitedDirector
Pavo Properties Pte. Ltd.Director
Pinenorth Properties LimitedDirector
Qaiser Holdings LimitedDirector
Queensway Hotel Holdings LimitedDirector
Queensway Hotel LimitedDirector
Rainbow North LimitedDirector
Redvale Developments Pte. Ltd.Director
Redvale Investments Pte. Ltd.Director
Redvale Properties Pte. Ltd.Director
Rehi Normanby Pty LtdDirector
Republic Hotels & Resorts LimitedDirector
Republic Iconic Hotel Pte. Ltd.Director
Republic Plaza City Club (Singapore) Pte LtdDirector
Reselton Properties LimitedDirector
Richmond Hotel Pte LtdDirector
Richview Holdings Pte LtdDirector
Rogo Investments Pte. Ltd.Director
Rogo Realty CorporationDirector
Scentview Holding LimitedDirector
Scottsdale Properties Pte. Ltd.Director
Serangoon Green Pte. Ltd.Director
Siena Commercial Development Pte. Ltd.Director
Siena Residential Development Pte. Ltd.Director
Siena Trustee Pte. Ltd.Director
Silkparc Holdings LimitedDirector
Singapura Developments (Private) LimitedDirector
SKD Marina LimitedDirector
SKIL Four LimitedDirector
SKIL Three LimitedDirector
Sonic Investment Pte. Ltd.Director
South Beach Consortium Pte. Ltd.
Alternate
Director
South Beach International Hotel
Management Pte. Ltd.
Director
Southwaters Investment Pte. Ltd.Director
Sparkland Holdings Pte. Ltd.Director
Summervale Properties Pte. Ltd.Director
Summit Vistas Pte. Ltd.Director
Sunmaster Holdings Pte. Ltd.Director
Sunny Vista Developments Pte. Ltd.Director
Sunshine Plaza Pte LtdDirector
Sycamore House Manco LimitedDirector
Tara Hotels Deutschland GmbH
(In members’ voluntary liquidation)
Director
TC Development Pte. Ltd.Director
The Philippine Fund LimitedDirector
TOSCAP LimitedDirector
Treasure Realm LimitedDirector
Trentwell Management Pte. Ltd.Director
Trentworth Properties LimitedDirector
Ventagrand Holdings Limited
(In members’ voluntary liquidation)
Director
Verwood Holdings Pte. Ltd.Director
Vinemont Investments Pte. Ltd.Director
Welland Investments LimitedDirector
White City Investments LimitedDirector
Whitehall Holdings LimitedDirector
Zatrio Pte LtdDirector
Notes:
1. This information is taken from responses to questionnaires circulated to
the Directors and Senior Managers by MCK after receipt of CDLHH NZ’s
Takeover Notice.
SCHEDULES 1–5
SCHEDULES 1–5
40MILLENNIUM w COPTHORNE HOTELS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED t TARGET COMPANY STATEMENT 2025
4141
APPENDIX:
INDEPENDENT
ADVISER’S REPORT
Left: The Cabana at M Social Auckland.
APPENDIX: INDEPENDENT ADVISER’S REPORT
Statement of Independence
Northington Partners Limited confirms that it:
- Has no conflict of interest that could affect its ability to provide an unbiased report; and
- Has no direct or indirect pecuniary or other interest in the proposed transaction considered in this report,
including any success or contingency fee or remuneration, other than to receive the cash fee for
providing this report.
Northington Partners Limited has satisfied the Takeovers Panel, on the basis of the material provided to the
Panel, that it is independent under the Takeovers Code.
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New
Zealand Limited
Independent Adviser’s Report
Prepared in relation to the Full Takeover Offer by CDL Hotels Holdings New
Zealand Limited
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 2
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
1.0 Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................... 4
1.1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ 4
1.2. Summary of the Takeover Offer ................................................................................................................ 4
1.3. Requirements of the Takeovers Code ....................................................................................................... 4
1.4. Basis of Evaluation .................................................................................................................................... 5
1.5. Summary of our Assessment of the Merits of the Offer ............................................................................ 5
1.6. Acceptance or Rejection of the Offer......................................................................................................... 6
2.0 Industry Overview ....................................................................................................................................... 7
2.1. NZ Hotel Sector Overview ......................................................................................................................... 7
2.2. Key Industry Drivers .................................................................................................................................. 7
2.3. Hotel Sector Performance ....................................................................................................................... 10
2.4. Hotel Industry Outlook ............................................................................................................................. 11
2.5. Residential Property Market .................................................................................................................... 12
3.0 Profile of MCK ............................................................................................................................................ 14
3.1. Overview of the Company ....................................................................................................................... 14
3.2. MCK Hotels Portfolio ............................................................................................................................... 14
3.3. CDL Investments ..................................................................................................................................... 16
3.4. Capital Structure and Ownership ............................................................................................................. 17
3.5. Share Price Performance ........................................................................................................................ 17
3.6. Share Liquidity ......................................................................................................................................... 18
3.7. Summary Financial Results ..................................................................................................................... 19
3.8. Market Value of Properties ...................................................................................................................... 22
3.9. Outlook .................................................................................................................................................... 24
4.0 Valuation of MCK ....................................................................................................................................... 26
4.1. Valuation Methodology ............................................................................................................................ 26
4.2. Treatment of Redeemable Preference Shares ........................................................................................ 27
4.3. FY25 Earnings Budget ............................................................................................................................ 28
4.4. Going Concern Value .............................................................................................................................. 29
4.5. Wind-up Value ......................................................................................................................................... 33
4.6. Valuation Conclusion ............................................................................................................................... 35
5.0 Assessment of the Merits of the Offer ..................................................................................................... 36
5.1. Comparison of the Offer Price to our Assessed Value of MCK ............................................................... 36
5.2. Consequences for Minority Shareholders if the Offer is not Successful ................................................. 36
5.3. Outcomes if the Offer is Successful ........................................................................................................ 37
5.4. Ability to Exit at Known Price
................................................................................................................... 37
Appendix 1. Sources of Information Used in this Report ....................................................................... 38
Appendix 2. Declarations, Qualifications and Consents ........................................................................ 39
Appendix 3. MCK Property Portfolio Market Valuation Details .............................................................. 41
Appendix 4. Comparable Companies and Transactions ........................................................................ 42
Cover photo supplied by Millennium & Copthorne Hotels NZ Limited: M Social Hotel Auckland
Statement of Independence
Northington Partners Limited confirms that it:
- Has no conflict of interest that could affect its ability to provide an unbiased report; and
- Has no direct or indirect pecuniary or other interest in the proposed transaction considered in this report,
including any success or contingency fee or remuneration, other than to receive the cash fee for
providing this report.
Northington Partners Limited has satisfied the Takeovers Panel, on the basis of the material provided to the
Panel, that it is independent under the Takeovers Code.
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New
Zealand Limited
Independent Adviser’s Report
Prepared in relation to the Full Takeover Offer by CDL Hotels Holdings New
Zealand Limited
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 2
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
1.0 Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................... 4
1.1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ 4
1.2. Summary of the Takeover Offer ................................................................................................................ 4
1.3. Requirements of the Takeovers Code ....................................................................................................... 4
1.4. Basis of Evaluation .................................................................................................................................... 5
1.5. Summary of our Assessment of the Merits of the Offer ............................................................................ 5
1.6. Acceptance or Rejection of the Offer......................................................................................................... 6
2.0 Industry Overview ....................................................................................................................................... 7
2.1. NZ Hotel Sector Overview ......................................................................................................................... 7
2.2. Key Industry Drivers .................................................................................................................................. 7
2.3. Hotel Sector Performance ....................................................................................................................... 10
2.4. Hotel Industry Outlook ............................................................................................................................. 11
2.5. Residential Property Market .................................................................................................................... 12
3.0 Profile of MCK ............................................................................................................................................ 14
3.1. Overview of the Company ....................................................................................................................... 14
3.2. MCK Hotels Portfolio ............................................................................................................................... 14
3.3. CDL Investments ..................................................................................................................................... 16
3.4. Capital Structure and Ownership ............................................................................................................. 17
3.5. Share Price Performance ........................................................................................................................ 17
3.6. Share Liquidity ......................................................................................................................................... 18
3.7. Summary Financial Results ..................................................................................................................... 19
3.8. Market Value of Properties ...................................................................................................................... 22
3.9. Outlook .................................................................................................................................................... 24
4.0 Valuation of MCK ....................................................................................................................................... 26
4.1. Valuation Methodology ............................................................................................................................ 26
4.2. Treatment of Redeemable Preference Shares ........................................................................................ 27
4.3. FY25 Earnings Budget ............................................................................................................................ 28
4.4. Going Concern Value .............................................................................................................................. 29
4.5. Wind-up Value ......................................................................................................................................... 33
4.6. Valuation Conclusion ............................................................................................................................... 35
5.0 Assessment of the Merits of the Offer ..................................................................................................... 36
5.1. Comparison of the Offer Price to our Assessed Value of MCK ............................................................... 36
5.2. Consequences for Minority Shareholders if the Offer is not Successful ................................................. 36
5.3. Outcomes if the Offer is Successful ........................................................................................................ 37
5.4. Ability to Exit at Known Price ................................................................................................................... 37
Appendix 1. Sources of Information Used in this Report .......................................................................
38
Appendix 2. Declarations, Qualifications and Consents ........................................................................ 39
Appendix 3. MCK Property Portfolio Market Valuation Details .............................................................. 41
Appendix 4. Comparable Companies and Transactions ........................................................................ 42
Cover photo supplied by Millennium & Copthorne Hotels NZ Limited: M Social Hotel Auckland
APPENDIX: INDEPENDENT ADVISER’S REPORT
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 3
Table of Contents
Abbreviations and Definitions
ADR Average Daily Rate
CDI CDL Investments New Zealand Limited
CDL CDL Hotels Holdings New Zealand Limited, a subsidiary of CDL Singapore
Stock Exchange listed City Developments Limited
Code The Takeovers Code
Company MCK
EV Enterprise Value
FY In relation to MCK, financial year ending 31 December
IAR This independent adviser report prepared by Northington Partners
MCK Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited
NAV Net asset value per share
NCI Non-controlling interests
Non-associated Shareholders Shareholders who are neither the Offeror nor Associates of the Offeror
Northington Partners Northington Partners Limited
NZ Hotels MCK’s owned and operated hotels in New Zealand as well as franchised
hotels
NZX NZX Limited
Offer The offer to purchase all of the fully paid ordinary shares in MCK not already
held by the Offeror, at NZ$2.25, dated 10 February 2025
Offeror CDL
RevPAR Revenue per available room
RPS Redeemable Preference Shares
Sofitel Brisbane JV 50% shareholding in Marquee Hotel Holdings Pty Limited, which owns the
Sofitel Brisbane Central Hotel
Surplus Land MCK’s surplus land adjacent to four hotels (Queenstown, Te Anau,
Palmerston North and Rotorua) and a land site acquired in Whangarei in 2024
for a future hotel development
Sydney Apartments Unsold residential units, commercial suites, carspaces and storage cages at
the Zenith Residences apartment complex located at 82-94 Darlinghurst Road
Potts Point NSW 2011, Australia
VWAP Volume-Weighted Average Price
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 4
Executive Summary
1.0 Executive Summary
1.1. Introduction
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited (“MCK” or the “Company”) is an NZX-listed
hotel owner and operator. MCK operates 19 hotels based in New Zealand under the Millennium,
Grand Millennium, M Social, Copthorne and Kingsgate brands. MCK is also the majority 65.3%
shareholder in NZX-listed commercial and residential property developer CDL Investments New
Zealand Limited (“CDI”) and has property interests in Australia including apartments in Sydney and a
50% ownership interest in the Sofitel Brisbane Central.
CDL Hotels Holdings New Zealand Limited ("CDL" or the “Offeror”) is MCK’s majority shareholder,
currently owning 75.86% of the ordinary shares on issue. On 20 January 2025, CDL gave notice of its
intention to make a full takeover offer for all of the fully paid ordinary shares in MCK not already held
by CDL (the “Offer”). The price for MCK shares under the Offer was set at $2.25 per share (“Offer
Price”), with the Offer open for acceptances until 5:00pm on 8 May 2025 (unless extended in
accordance with the Code).
MCK has also issued approximately 52 million redeemable preference shares which are listed on the
NZX Main Board (the “RPS”). The RPS are not covered under the Code and are accordingly not
included in the Offer. As such, this report does not provide a view on the value of the RPS.
1.2. Summary of the Takeover Offer
The key terms of the Offer are summarised as follows:
- The Offer is to acquire the 24.14% of ordinary MCK shares that CDL does not already own at
a cash price of NZ$2.25 per share;
- The Offer opened for acceptances on 10 February 2025 and will close at 5:00pm on 8 May
2025 (unless it is extended in accordance with the Code);
- The Offer is subject to several conditions (which can be waived, in whole or part, by CDL at
its discretion), including:
• that CDL receives acceptances which will result in it holding or controlling 90% or
more of the voting rights in MCK (“Minimum Acceptance Condition”);
• CDL obtains consent under the Overseas Investment Act 2005 and the Overseas
Investment Regulations 2005; and
• that a range of certain events or circumstances have not occurred at the time the
Offer is declared unconditional.
The latest date that the Offer can be declared unconditional is 6 June 2025 (unless the Offer
is extended prior); and
- Payment for the shares will be made in cash no later than five working days after the later of
the date on which the Offer acceptance is received, the date on which the Offer is declared
unconditional, or the initial Offer closing date.
1.3. Requirements of the Takeovers Code
MCK is a “Code Company” for the purposes of the Code. The Offer and the Company’s response to
the Offer must therefore comply with the provisions set out in the Code.
Rule 21 of the Code requires that the directors of MCK must obtain a report from an independent
adviser on the merits of the Offer. The Company’s Independent Directors requested Northington
Partners Limited (“Northington Partners”) to prepare the independent adviser’s report required by
Rule 21 of the Code, and our appointment was subsequently approved by the Takeovers Panel.
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 3
Table of Contents
Abbreviations and Definitions
ADR Average Daily Rate
CDI CDL Investments New Zealand Limited
CDL CDL Hotels Holdings New Zealand Limited, a subsidiary of CDL Singapore
Stock Exchange listed City Developments Limited
Code The Takeovers Code
Company MCK
EV Enterprise Value
FY In relation to MCK, financial year ending 31 December
IAR This independent adviser report prepared by Northington Partners
MCK Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited
NAV Net asset value per share
NCI Non-controlling interests
Non-associated Shareholders Shareholders who are neither the Offeror nor Associates of the Offeror
Northington Partners Northington Partners Limited
NZ Hotels MCK’s owned and operated hotels in New Zealand as well as franchised
hotels
NZX NZX Limited
Offer The offer to purchase all of the fully paid ordinary shares in MCK not already
held by the Offeror, at NZ$2.25, dated 10 February 2025
Offeror CDL
RevPAR Revenue per available room
RPS Redeemable Preference Shares
Sofitel Brisbane JV 50% shareholding in Marquee Hotel Holdings Pty Limited, which owns the
Sofitel Brisbane Central Hotel
Surplus Land MCK’s surplus land adjacent to four hotels (Queenstown, Te Anau,
Palmerston North and Rotorua) and a land site acquired in Whangarei in 2024
for a future hotel development
Sydney Apartments Unsold residential units, commercial suites, carspaces and storage cages at
the Zenith Residences apartment complex located at 82-94 Darlinghurst Road
Potts Point NSW 2011, Australia
VWAP Volume-Weighted Average Price
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 4
Executive Summary
1.0 Executive Summary
1.1. Introduction
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited (“MCK” or the “Company”) is an NZX-listed
hotel owner and operator. MCK operates 19 hotels based in New Zealand under the Millennium,
Grand Millennium, M Social, Copthorne and Kingsgate brands. MCK is also the majority 65.3%
shareholder in NZX-listed commercial and residential property developer CDL Investments New
Zealand Limited (“CDI”) and has property interests in Australia including apartments in Sydney and a
50% ownership interest in the Sofitel Brisbane Central.
CDL Hotels Holdings New Zealand Limited ("CDL" or the “Offeror”) is MCK’s majority shareholder,
currently owning 75.86% of the ordinary shares on issue. On 20 January 2025, CDL gave notice of its
intention to make a full takeover offer for all of the fully paid ordinary shares in MCK not already held
by CDL (the “Offer”). The price for MCK shares under the Offer was set at $2.25 per share (“Offer
Price”), with the Offer open for acceptances until 5:00pm on 8 May 2025 (unless extended in
accordance with the Code).
MCK has also issued approximately 52 million redeemable preference shares which are listed on the
NZX Main Board (the “RPS”). The RPS are not covered under the Code and are accordingly not
included in the Offer. As such, this report does not provide a view on the value of the RPS.
1.2. Summary of the Takeover Offer
The key terms of the Offer are summarised as follows:
- The Offer is to acquire the 24.14% of ordinary MCK shares that CDL does not already own at
a cash price of NZ$2.25 per share;
- The Offer opened for acceptances on 10 February 2025 and will close at 5:00pm on 8 May
2025 (unless it is extended in accordance with the Code);
- The Offer is subject to several conditions (which can be waived, in whole or part, by CDL at
its discretion), including:
• that CDL receives acceptances which will result in it holding or controlling 90% or
more of the voting rights in MCK (“Minimum Acceptance Condition”);
• CDL obtains consent under the Overseas Investment Act 2005 and the Overseas
Investment Regulations 2005; and
• that a range of certain events or circumstances have not occurred at the time the
Offer is declared unconditional.
The latest date that the Offer can be declared unconditional is 6 June 2025 (unless the Offer
is extended prior); and
- Payment for the shares will be made in cash no later than five working days after the later of
the date on which the Offer acceptance is received, the date on which the Offer is declared
unconditional, or the initial Offer closing date.
1.3. Requirements of the Takeovers Code
MCK is a “Code Company” for the purposes of the Code. The Offer and the Company’s response to
the Offer must therefore comply with the provisions set out in the Code.
Rule 21 of the Code requires that the directors of MCK must obtain a report from an independent
adviser on the merits of the Offer. The Company’s Independent Directors requested Northington
Partners Limited (“Northington Partners”) to prepare the independent adviser’s report required by
Rule 21 of the Code, and our appointment was subsequently approved by the Takeovers Panel.
APPENDIX: INDEPENDENT ADVISER’S REPORT
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 5
Executive Summary
This report will accompany the Target Company Statement to be sent to all MCK shareholders and
sets out our opinion on the merits of the Offer. This report should not be used for any other purpose
and should be read in conjunction with the declarations, qualifications and consents set out in
Appendix 2.
1.4. Basis of Evaluation
The exact meaning of the word “merits” is not prescribed in the Code and there is no well accepted,
authoritative New Zealand reference that clearly establishes what should be considered when
assessing the merits of a takeover offer. Although the Takeovers Panel has published a guidance
note about the role of an Independent Adviser, it has been careful not to limit the scope of the
assessment and states that the relevant factors which should be taken into consideration will depend
on the features of the proposed transaction as well as the prevailing circumstances of the parties
involved. However, the Takeovers Panel suggests that a merits assessment is broader than a
valuation assessment and will include other positive and negative aspects of a transaction.
We have assessed the merits of the Offer by taking into account the following factors:
- Our estimate of the underlying value range for 100% of the ordinary shares in MCK;
- A comparison of our estimated value range to the Offer Price;
- The prospects, attractiveness and risk profile of the Company;
- The current level of liquidity for MCK’s shares and other potential opportunities that shareholders
may have to sell shares in the future; and
- Any other advantages or disadvantages for MCK shareholders of accepting or rejecting the Offer.
1.5. Summary of our Assessment of the Merits of the Offer
Our full assessment of the merits of the Offer for MCK’s shareholders is set out in Section 5.0. A
summary is presented below in Table 1.
Table 1: Summary of Merits of the Offer
Item Key Conclusions Further
Information
Value of the
Offer
- We have valued 100% of the equity in MCK in a range between
$696.2 million and $791.1 million, which corresponds to a value of
$4.40 to $5.00 per share. This is based on our assessment of the fair
market value of MCK both as a going concern and via the potential
orderly realisation of assets through a wind-up and liquidation of the
Company.
- As shown below in Figure 1, the mid-point of our assessed value
range ($4.70 per share) is more than double the Offer Price of $2.25.
Even allowing for a reasonable margin of error in relation to our
valuation, we conclude that the Offer significantly undervalues the
Company.
Figure 1: Comparison of Offer Price to Assessed Value Range
Sources: Northington Partners; NZX; Offer.
1
NZX traded price represents the VWAP
of ordinary shares during the 20 days prior to the Offer announcement.
Sections 4
and 5
$4.40
$5.00
$4.70
$1.75
$2.25
$-
$1.00
$2.00
$3.00
$4.00
$5.00
$6.00
$7.00
LowHighMidTraded
Price
(NZX)
Offer
Price
1
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 6
Executive Summary
Item Key Conclusions Further
Information
- Our valuation range excludes potential synergy and strategic benefits
from 100% ownership of MCK. These are expected to be material and
provide additional value benefit to CDL.
Consequences
for Minority
Shareholders if
the Offer is not
Successful
- If the Offer conditions are not fully satisfied or waived by CDL, the
Offer will lapse and MCK will continue to operate in its current form.
Key consequences for minority shareholders under this scenario
include the following:
o CDL has stated its intention is to make no significant changes to
the business or its strategy. That includes evaluating “business
decisions using criteria that are oriented towards long-term
sustainability”, which we interpret to mean that distributions
would remain at the current low level.
o We expect that the low level of liquidity for MCK shares would
continue and minority shareholders will have limited ability to sell
their MCK shares on market for the foreseeable future.
o The MCK shares are likely to continue to trade at a significant
discount to our assessed value range because of the lack of
liquidity and ongoing minority discount attributed to small share
parcels.
- However, in the event that this Offer is unsuccessful, we believe that
CDL will remain motivated to reach the 90% ownership level needed to
utilise the compulsory acquisition provisions of the Code. One of those
options is to make a further takeover offer at a higher price (or to
increase the price for the current Offer, pursuant to the terms of the
Code).
Section 5
Other
Considerations
in Respect of
the Offer
- In our view, the likelihood of an alternative takeover offer emerging for
MCK from a party other than CDL is extremely low. As CDL already
controls 75.9% of the voting rights in the Company, any alternative
takeover offer would require CDL’s support.
- Because there is no certainty that CDL will make a new offer (or
improve the price under the current Offer), some shareholders may
see the Offer as an opportunity to fully exit their investment in MCK at
a known price (without brokerage costs).
- As discussed above, MCK shares are highly illiquid and will remain so
if the Offer is unsuccessful. Given the uncertainties relating to the
share price and market liquidity after the Offer has closed, some
shareholders may accept a price lower than the perceived value of the
shares in return for a certain exit.
Section 5
1.6. Acceptance or Rejection of the Offer
This report represents one source of information that MCK shareholders may wish to consider when
forming their own view on whether to accept or reject the Offer. It is not possible to contemplate all
shareholders’ personal circumstances or investment objectives and our assessment is therefore
general in nature. The appropriate course of action for each shareholder is dependent on their own
unique situation. If appropriate, shareholders should consult their own professional adviser(s).
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 5
Executive Summary
This report will accompany the Target Company Statement to be sent to all MCK shareholders and
sets out our opinion on the merits of the Offer. This report should not be used for any other purpose
and should be read in conjunction with the declarations, qualifications and consents set out in
Appendix 2.
1.4. Basis of Evaluation
The exact meaning of the word “merits” is not prescribed in the Code and there is no well accepted,
authoritative New Zealand reference that clearly establishes what should be considered when
assessing the merits of a takeover offer. Although the Takeovers Panel has published a guidance
note about the role of an Independent Adviser, it has been careful not to limit the scope of the
assessment and states that the relevant factors which should be taken into consideration will depend
on the features of the proposed transaction as well as the prevailing circumstances of the parties
involved. However, the Takeovers Panel suggests that a merits assessment is broader than a
valuation assessment and will include other positive and negative aspects of a transaction.
We have assessed the merits of the Offer by taking into account the following factors:
- Our estimate of the underlying value range for 100% of the ordinary shares in MCK;
- A comparison of our estimated value range to the Offer Price;
- The prospects, attractiveness and risk profile of the Company;
- The current level of liquidity for MCK’s shares and other potential opportunities that shareholders
may have to sell shares in the future; and
- Any other advantages or disadvantages for MCK shareholders of accepting or rejecting the Offer.
1.5. Summary of our Assessment of the Merits of the Offer
Our full assessment of the merits of the Offer for MCK’s shareholders is set out in Section 5.0. A
summary is presented below in Table 1.
Table 1: Summary of Merits of the Offer
Item Key Conclusions Further
Information
Value of the
Offer
- We have valued 100% of the equity in MCK in a range between
$696.2 million and $791.1 million, which corresponds to a value of
$4.40 to $5.00 per share. This is based on our assessment of the fair
market value of MCK both as a going concern and via the potential
orderly realisation of assets through a wind-up and liquidation of the
Company.
- As shown below in Figure 1, the mid-point of our assessed value
range ($4.70 per share) is more than double the Offer Price of $2.25.
Even allowing for a reasonable margin of error in relation to our
valuation, we conclude that the Offer significantly undervalues the
Company.
Figure 1: Comparison of Offer Price to Assessed Value Range
Sources: Northington Partners; NZX; Offer.
1
NZX traded price represents the VWAP
of ordinary shares during the 20 days prior to the Offer announcement.
Sections 4
and 5
$4.40
$5.00
$4.70
$1.75
$2.25
$-
$1.00
$2.00
$3.00
$4.00
$5.00
$6.00
$7.00
LowHighMidTraded
Price
(NZX)
Offer
Price
1
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 6
Executive Summary
Item Key Conclusions Further
Information
- Our valuation range excludes potential synergy and strategic benefits
from 100% ownership of MCK. These are expected to be material and
provide additional value benefit to CDL.
Consequences
for Minority
Shareholders if
the Offer is not
Successful
- If the Offer conditions are not fully satisfied or waived by CDL, the
Offer will lapse and MCK will continue to operate in its current form.
Key consequences for minority shareholders under this scenario
include the following:
o CDL has stated its intention is to make no significant changes to
the business or its strategy. That includes evaluating “business
decisions using criteria that are oriented towards long-term
sustainability”, which we interpret to mean that distributions
would remain at the current low level.
o We expect that the low level of liquidity for MCK shares would
continue and minority shareholders will have limited ability to sell
their MCK shares on market for the foreseeable future.
o The MCK shares are likely to continue to trade at a significant
discount to our assessed value range because of the lack of
liquidity and ongoing minority discount attributed to small share
parcels.
- However, in the event that this Offer is unsuccessful, we believe that
CDL will remain motivated to reach the 90% ownership level needed to
utilise the compulsory acquisition provisions of the Code. One of those
options is to make a further takeover offer at a higher price (or to
increase the price for the current Offer, pursuant to the terms of the
Code).
Section 5
Other
Considerations
in Respect of
the Offer
- In our view, the likelihood of an alternative takeover offer emerging for
MCK from a party other than CDL is extremely low. As CDL already
controls 75.9% of the voting rights in the Company, any alternative
takeover offer would require CDL’s support.
- Because there is no certainty that CDL will make a new offer (or
improve the price under the current Offer), some shareholders may
see the Offer as an opportunity to fully exit their investment in MCK at
a known price (without brokerage costs).
- As discussed above, MCK shares are highly illiquid and will remain so
if the Offer is unsuccessful. Given the uncertainties relating to the
share price and market liquidity after the Offer has closed, some
shareholders may accept a price lower than the perceived value of the
shares in return for a certain exit.
Section 5
1.6. Acceptance or Rejection of the Offer
This report represents one source of information that MCK shareholders may wish to consider when
forming their own view on whether to accept or reject the Offer. It is not possible to contemplate all
shareholders’ personal circumstances or investment objectives and our assessment is therefore
general in nature. The appropriate course of action for each shareholder is dependent on their own
unique situation. If appropriate, shareholders should consult their own professional adviser(s).
APPENDIX: INDEPENDENT ADVISER’S REPORT
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 7
Industry Overview
2.0 Industry Overview
2.1. NZ Hotel Sector Overview
New Zealand’s accommodation sector is made up of hotels, motels, backpackers, non-traditional
accommodation (home sharing / AirBnb), and holiday parks and campgrounds. MCK only participates
in the hotel sector. The New Zealand hotel sector predominantly serves both domestic and international
travellers, travelling for either tourism or business purposes.
Within the hotel sector, New Zealand has an inventory of approximately 35,000 hotel rooms. Table 2
below details the 10 largest hotel chains in New Zealand as of July 2023 and highlights that MCK is the
second largest operator in the sector (at that time).
Table 2: New Zealand Hotel Market Share by Operator (by Number of Rooms as of July 2023)
Rank Operator Rooms Estimated Market Share %
1 Accor 5,641 16.0%
2 MCK 2,396 6.8%
3 IHG Hotels & Resorts 2,161 6.1%
4 Ascott International Management 1,845 5.2%
5 EVT Hospitality & Entertainment 1,879 5.3%
6 Scenic Hotel Group 1,422 4.0%
7 Distinction Hotels 1,345 3.8%
8 Wyndham Hotels & Resorts 1,359 3.9%
9 Sudima Hotels 1,153 3.3%
10 Hilton Worldwide 1,039 2.9%
Source: Horwath HTL. Operator rooms by chain group (including managed and franchised) as of the assessed date (July 2023).
Current room numbers may differ.
Hotel operators in New Zealand include major global chains such as Accor and Hilton which
predominantly operate in major urban centres, catering to international and corporate travellers.
Alongside these, domestic hotel chains (such as Scenic, Distinction, and Sudima) serve a wider range
of regions including secondary cities and popular tourist destinations, offering accommodation tailored
to local demand. Additionally, a diverse network of smaller independent hotels provides unique,
boutique or budget-friendly options.
More than half of the hotels in New Zealand have fewer than 50 rooms
1
. Approximately 80% of these
smaller hotels are unbranded with independent operators. Branded operators tend to operate larger
hotels and although they represent a smaller portion of hotels by number, they supply approximately
two thirds of the available room supply with an average room size of over 100 rooms per property.
Given the prevalence of small properties, many international brands seek out affiliations, franchise
agreements or management opportunities with existing hotels. MCK is relatively unique in New Zealand
because it generally owns and manages the hotels within its portfolio of brands.
2.2. Key Industry Drivers
The hotel sector serves both domestic and international travellers. With a relatively small population of
~5.2 million people, the performance of the New Zealand hotel sector is highly dependent on
international visitor arrivals. Historically, international travellers contributed circa 50% of New Zealand’s
total hotel room nights.
1
Horwath HTL Hotels & Chains Report 2023
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 8
Industry Overview
As shown in Figure 2, the Covid-19 pandemic severely impacted travel to New Zealand. International
visitor numbers have since recovered but are yet to reach pre-pandemic levels of ~3.9m arrivals that
were achieved in 2019.
Figure 2: New Zealand International Visitor Arrivals (000s per month)
Source: StatsNZ Visitor Arrivals.
Whilst international visitor numbers have recovered to ~84% of their pre-pandemic levels, this has
largely been driven by a strong recovery of those visiting friends and family. The recovery in the key
hotel related markets of tourism and business has been slower, at circa 79% and 61% respectively as
demonstrated in the subsequent sections below.
2.2.1. International Visitors by Country
Figure 3 provides a summary of international visitor arrivals into New Zealand by country of origin for
the 2016 – 2019 period (broadly pre-Covid) and the subsequent period to the end of 2024.
Figure 3: International Visitor Arrivals – Country of Residence (000s per annum)
Source: StatsNZ Visitor Arrivals.
Australia is by far New Zealand’s most significant source of international arrivals with approximately
1.5m arrivals in 2019 (40% of total arrivals). The 2024 arrivals from Australia have recovered to ~88%
of 2019 levels and remains New Zealand’s key inbound tourism market. Australians have historically
visited for holiday purposes (~40%), to visit friends or family (~40%), or for business purposes (~10%).
Other key markets include the USA, China, Asia (ex-China) and Europe:
− Visitors from the USA have recovered to near pre-pandemic levels, although business travel
from the USA remains 35% down.
− China’s prolonged pandemic response and slow easing of travel restrictions served to delay the
recovery in Chinese tourist numbers. Globally, Chinese tourist activity remains ~15% down on
pre-pandemic levels, but the recovery to travel to New Zealand has been slower with arrivals
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
Jan-15Jan-16Jan-17Jan-18Jan-19Jan-20Jan-21Jan-22Jan-23Jan-24
Vistor ArrivalsSeasonally Adjusted
1,409
1,472
1,495
1,538
360
160
829
1,258
1,358
3,494
3,723
3,858
3,888
996
207
1,434
2,957
3,263
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
201620172018201920202021202220232024
USAAmericas less USAOceania less AusOtherAustraliaChinaAsia less ChinaEurope
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 7
Industry Overview
2.0 Industry Overview
2.1. NZ Hotel Sector Overview
New Zealand’s accommodation sector is made up of hotels, motels, backpackers, non-traditional
accommodation (home sharing / AirBnb), and holiday parks and campgrounds. MCK only participates
in the hotel sector. The New Zealand hotel sector predominantly serves both domestic and international
travellers, travelling for either tourism or business purposes.
Within the hotel sector, New Zealand has an inventory of approximately 35,000 hotel rooms. Table 2
below details the 10 largest hotel chains in New Zealand as of July 2023 and highlights that MCK is the
second largest operator in the sector (at that time).
Table 2: New Zealand Hotel Market Share by Operator (by Number of Rooms as of July 2023)
Rank Operator Rooms Estimated Market Share %
1 Accor 5,641 16.0%
2 MCK 2,396 6.8%
3 IHG Hotels & Resorts 2,161 6.1%
4 Ascott International Management 1,845 5.2%
5 EVT Hospitality & Entertainment 1,879 5.3%
6 Scenic Hotel Group 1,422 4.0%
7 Distinction Hotels 1,345 3.8%
8 Wyndham Hotels & Resorts 1,359 3.9%
9 Sudima Hotels 1,153 3.3%
10 Hilton Worldwide 1,039 2.9%
Source: Horwath HTL. Operator rooms by chain group (including managed and franchised) as of the assessed date (July 2023).
Current room numbers may differ.
Hotel operators in New Zealand include major global chains such as Accor and Hilton which
predominantly operate in major urban centres, catering to international and corporate travellers.
Alongside these, domestic hotel chains (such as Scenic, Distinction, and Sudima) serve a wider range
of regions including secondary cities and popular tourist destinations, offering accommodation tailored
to local demand. Additionally, a diverse network of smaller independent hotels provides unique,
boutique or budget-friendly options.
More than half of the hotels in New Zealand have fewer than 50 rooms
1
. Approximately 80% of these
smaller hotels are unbranded with independent operators. Branded operators tend to operate larger
hotels and although they represent a smaller portion of hotels by number, they supply approximately
two thirds of the available room supply with an average room size of over 100 rooms per property.
Given the prevalence of small properties, many international brands seek out affiliations, franchise
agreements or management opportunities with existing hotels. MCK is relatively unique in New Zealand
because it generally owns and manages the hotels within its portfolio of brands.
2.2. Key Industry Drivers
The hotel sector serves both domestic and international travellers. With a relatively small population of
~5.2 million people, the performance of the New Zealand hotel sector is highly dependent on
international visitor arrivals. Historically, international travellers contributed circa 50% of New Zealand’s
total hotel room nights.
1
Horwath HTL Hotels & Chains Report 2023
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 8
Industry Overview
As shown in Figure 2, the Covid-19 pandemic severely impacted travel to New Zealand. International
visitor numbers have since recovered but are yet to reach pre-pandemic levels of ~3.9m arrivals that
were achieved in 2019.
Figure 2: New Zealand International Visitor Arrivals (000s per month)
Source: StatsNZ Visitor Arrivals.
Whilst international visitor numbers have recovered to ~84% of their pre-pandemic levels, this has
largely been driven by a strong recovery of those visiting friends and family. The recovery in the key
hotel related markets of tourism and business has been slower, at circa 79% and 61% respectively as
demonstrated in the subsequent sections below.
2.2.1. International Visitors by Country
Figure 3 provides a summary of international visitor arrivals into New Zealand by country of origin for
the 2016 – 2019 period (broadly pre-Covid) and the subsequent period to the end of 2024.
Figure 3: International Visitor Arrivals – Country of Residence (000s per annum)
Source: StatsNZ Visitor Arrivals.
Australia is by far New Zealand’s most significant source of international arrivals with approximately
1.5m arrivals in 2019 (40% of total arrivals). The 2024 arrivals from Australia have recovered to ~88%
of 2019 levels and remains New Zealand’s key inbound tourism market. Australians have historically
visited for holiday purposes (~40%), to visit friends or family (~40%), or for business purposes (~10%).
Other key markets include the USA, China, Asia (ex-China) and Europe:
− Visitors from the USA have recovered to near pre-pandemic levels, although business travel
from the USA remains 35% down.
− China’s prolonged pandemic response and slow easing of travel restrictions served to delay the
recovery in Chinese tourist numbers. Globally, Chinese tourist activity remains ~15% down on
pre-pandemic levels, but the recovery to travel to New Zealand has been slower with arrivals
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
Jan-15Jan-16Jan-17Jan-18Jan-19Jan-20Jan-21Jan-22Jan-23Jan-24
Vistor ArrivalsSeasonally Adjusted
1,409
1,472
1,495
1,538
360
160
829
1,258
1,358
3,494
3,723
3,858
3,888
996
207
1,434
2,957
3,263
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
201620172018201920202021202220232024
USAAmericas less USAOceania less AusOtherAustraliaChinaAsia less ChinaEurope
APPENDIX: INDEPENDENT ADVISER’S REPORT
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 9
Industry Overview
still ~28% below pre-pandemic levels. This is due in part to the pandemic’s impact on
household savings and depreciation of the yuan, leading Chinese travellers to seek out more
budget friendly travel destinations.
− European visitors are down by 140k per annum (25%) compared to pre-pandemic levels. This
is driven by a 85k (28%) reduction in the number of holiday makers and a 20k (45%) reduction
in the number of business travellers.
2.2.2. International Visitors by Purpose
Figure 4 provides a summary of international visitor arrivals into New Zealand by purpose of travel.
Figure 4: International Visitor Arrivals – Purpose of Travel (000s per annum)
Source: StatsNZ Visitor Arrivals.
Tourism travel (holiday/vacation) has historically made up over 50% of international arrivals to New
Zealand but was still slightly lower in 2024 (~48%) and remains ~400k (21%) below pre-pandemic
levels. This reduction is observed across all of New Zealand’s main tourism markets, with the largest
(46%) reduction observed in tourists arriving from China, whilst tourists from Australia and the USA
have largely recovered to be only marginally below pre-pandemic levels.
The reduction in New Zealand tourism activity is at odds with the global tourism market where 2024
global tourism travel was 99% of pre-pandemic levels
2
. This is believed to be due to the significant
increase in travel costs since the pandemic, with tourists becoming more cost-conscious and actively
seeking better value for money. As a high-cost destination and due to the long-travel distances, New
Zealand has faced more headwinds than other international destinations. This has been exacerbated
by staffing issues driven by a tight labour market and a delay in rebuilding the workforce that historically
included many young people holding working holiday visas.
Another major contributor to international arrivals include those visiting for family reasons (~31% of
2024 arrivals). This category has been more immune to Covid-19 compared to business-related and
tourist travel.
2.2.3. Domestic Travellers
Hotel demand from domestic travellers is driven primarily by business travel, leisure and entertainment,
and to a lesser extent, domestic tourism. All of these factors have been impacted by broader domestic
economic conditions and consumer confidence.
Domestic travel experienced a sharp rebound immediately post-pandemic as consumer and business
spending increased, driven by rising wages, pent-up demand, limited international travel opportunities,
strong consumer confidence, and government wage subsidies and broader spending. With borders
2
United Nations World Tourism Organisation – Dec 2024
1,817
1,953
2,021
1,972
515
32
500
1,323
1,564
1,021
1,075
1,098
1,077
289
120
631
976
1,012
3,494
3,723
3,858
3,888
996
207
1,434
2,957
3,263
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
201620172018201920202021202220232024
Holiday/VacationBusinessConventions/Conferences
EducationUnspecified/Not CollectedOther
Visit Friends/Relatives
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 10
Industry Overview
closed, New Zealanders redirected discretionary spending toward domestic tourism, providing a
temporary boost to the sector.
However, this momentum was short-lived as several economic headwinds emerged. As the New
Zealand economy entered a period of slower growth, rising interest rates and higher inflation, business
activity weakened and consumer disposable income levels reduced. This has led to a decline in
corporate travel as companies cut costs and scaled back discretionary spending. Anecdotal evidence
also suggests there may have been a permanent shift in business travel behaviours as the pandemic
transformed the way people work online with less requirement to travel.
Domestic tourism travel has been impacted by the rising cost pressures resulting in reduced or
downgraded travel plans. The re-opening of overseas travel has also resulted in travellers bypassing
New Zealand in favour of holidaying overseas.
While the post-pandemic tourism and economic impacts have largely stabilized, we understand that
domestic travel demand remains significantly lower than during the immediate post-pandemic peak,
and modestly lower than pre-pandemic levels.
2.3. Hotel Sector Performance
Key performance drivers for the hotel sector include hotel occupancy levels (relative to available rooms)
and revenue per bed, usually measured by average daily rate (“ADR”) and revenue per available room
(“RevPAR”) metrics. RevPAR is effectively the same as ADR but reflects overall occupancy levels (i.e.
for a hotel with 100% occupancy, ADR and RevPAR are equal).
Together, the early rebound in domestic travel and the gradual recovery in international travel is
reflected in the total hotel guest nights as shown in Figure 5. Despite international visitor numbers being
down on pre-pandemic levels, hotel guest nights peaked at levels higher than pre-pandemic in late
2023. The continued recovery in international visitors through 2024 replaced the small decrease in
guest nights from domestic travellers and is expected to contribute to increased hotel demand over
2025.
Figure 5: Hotel Guest Nights (000s per month)
Sources: StatsNZ Accommodation Survey (to September 2019), MBIE Accommodation Data Programme (from June 2020).
Improved guest night demand has increased hotel occupancy levels and is a key factor in driving ADRs
and RevPARs as well as supporting the sector in building more rooms (where the demand driven
response is to increase pricing or availability of rooms, including reopening of rooms which may have
been refurbished or closed during the pandemic).
Figure 6 below demonstrates the level of available rooms and hotel occupancy across the New Zealand
hotel sector from 2016 to 2024. This shows that the level of available rooms dropped by approximately
5,000 due to Covid-19 but has since recovered to 2019 levels supported by increasing demand for
rooms. Most of the increased supply has been in the main tourism sectors of Auckland, Queenstown
and Christchurch. Occupancy levels have also increased from as low as ~20% in September 2021 to
~80% in December 2024.
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
201620172018201920202021202220232024
Total guest nights Domestic guest nights International guest nights
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 9
Industry Overview
still ~28% below pre-pandemic levels. This is due in part to the pandemic’s impact on
household savings and depreciation of the yuan, leading Chinese travellers to seek out more
budget friendly travel destinations.
− European visitors are down by 140k per annum (25%) compared to pre-pandemic levels. This
is driven by a 85k (28%) reduction in the number of holiday makers and a 20k (45%) reduction
in the number of business travellers.
2.2.2. International Visitors by Purpose
Figure 4 provides a summary of international visitor arrivals into New Zealand by purpose of travel.
Figure 4: International Visitor Arrivals – Purpose of Travel (000s per annum)
Source: StatsNZ Visitor Arrivals.
Tourism travel (holiday/vacation) has historically made up over 50% of international arrivals to New
Zealand but was still slightly lower in 2024 (~48%) and remains ~400k (21%) below pre-pandemic
levels. This reduction is observed across all of New Zealand’s main tourism markets, with the largest
(46%) reduction observed in tourists arriving from China, whilst tourists from Australia and the USA
have largely recovered to be only marginally below pre-pandemic levels.
The reduction in New Zealand tourism activity is at odds with the global tourism market where 2024
global tourism travel was 99% of pre-pandemic levels
2
. This is believed to be due to the significant
increase in travel costs since the pandemic, with tourists becoming more cost-conscious and actively
seeking better value for money. As a high-cost destination and due to the long-travel distances, New
Zealand has faced more headwinds than other international destinations. This has been exacerbated
by staffing issues driven by a tight labour market and a delay in rebuilding the workforce that historically
included many young people holding working holiday visas.
Another major contributor to international arrivals include those visiting for family reasons (~31% of
2024 arrivals). This category has been more immune to Covid-19 compared to business-related and
tourist travel.
2.2.3. Domestic Travellers
Hotel demand from domestic travellers is driven primarily by business travel, leisure and entertainment,
and to a lesser extent, domestic tourism. All of these factors have been impacted by broader domestic
economic conditions and consumer confidence.
Domestic travel experienced a sharp rebound immediately post-pandemic as consumer and business
spending increased, driven by rising wages, pent-up demand, limited international travel opportunities,
strong consumer confidence, and government wage subsidies and broader spending. With borders
2
United Nations World Tourism Organisation – Dec 2024
1,817
1,953
2,021
1,972
515
32
500
1,323
1,564
1,021
1,075
1,098
1,077
289
120
631
976
1,012
3,494
3,723
3,858
3,888
996
207
1,434
2,957
3,263
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
201620172018201920202021202220232024
Holiday/VacationBusinessConventions/Conferences
EducationUnspecified/Not CollectedOther
Visit Friends/Relatives
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 10
Industry Overview
closed, New Zealanders redirected discretionary spending toward domestic tourism, providing a
temporary boost to the sector.
However, this momentum was short-lived as several economic headwinds emerged. As the New
Zealand economy entered a period of slower growth, rising interest rates and higher inflation, business
activity weakened and consumer disposable income levels reduced. This has led to a decline in
corporate travel as companies cut costs and scaled back discretionary spending. Anecdotal evidence
also suggests there may have been a permanent shift in business travel behaviours as the pandemic
transformed the way people work online with less requirement to travel.
Domestic tourism travel has been impacted by the rising cost pressures resulting in reduced or
downgraded travel plans. The re-opening of overseas travel has also resulted in travellers bypassing
New Zealand in favour of holidaying overseas.
While the post-pandemic tourism and economic impacts have largely stabilized, we understand that
domestic travel demand remains significantly lower than during the immediate post-pandemic peak,
and modestly lower than pre-pandemic levels.
2.3. Hotel Sector Performance
Key performance drivers for the hotel sector include hotel occupancy levels (relative to available rooms)
and revenue per bed, usually measured by average daily rate (“ADR”) and revenue per available room
(“RevPAR”) metrics. RevPAR is effectively the same as ADR but reflects overall occupancy levels (i.e.
for a hotel with 100% occupancy, ADR and RevPAR are equal).
Together, the early rebound in domestic travel and the gradual recovery in international travel is
reflected in the total hotel guest nights as shown in Figure 5. Despite international visitor numbers being
down on pre-pandemic levels, hotel guest nights peaked at levels higher than pre-pandemic in late
2023. The continued recovery in international visitors through 2024 replaced the small decrease in
guest nights from domestic travellers and is expected to contribute to increased hotel demand over
2025.
Figure 5: Hotel Guest Nights (000s per month)
Sources: StatsNZ Accommodation Survey (to September 2019), MBIE Accommodation Data Programme (from June 2020).
Improved guest night demand has increased hotel occupancy levels and is a key factor in driving ADRs
and RevPARs as well as supporting the sector in building more rooms (where the demand driven
response is to increase pricing or availability of rooms, including reopening of rooms which may have
been refurbished or closed during the pandemic).
Figure 6 below demonstrates the level of available rooms and hotel occupancy across the New Zealand
hotel sector from 2016 to 2024. This shows that the level of available rooms dropped by approximately
5,000 due to Covid-19 but has since recovered to 2019 levels supported by increasing demand for
rooms. Most of the increased supply has been in the main tourism sectors of Auckland, Queenstown
and Christchurch. Occupancy levels have also increased from as low as ~20% in September 2021 to
~80% in December 2024.
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
201620172018201920202021202220232024
Total guest nights Domestic guest nights International guest nights
APPENDIX: INDEPENDENT ADVISER’S REPORT
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 11
Industry Overview
Figure 6: National Hotel Room Availability and Occupancy
Sources: StatsNZ Accommodation Survey (to September 2019), MBIE Accommodation Data Programme (from June 2020).
As shown in Figure 7, the impact of reduced demand in the early stage of the pandemic recovery can
be observed in the ADR charged by hotels and the changes in RevPAR. While hotels have since
increased ADRs in response to increased demand and cost pressures, RevPAR was only marginally
above 2019 levels in 2023 ($158 vs $155). This reflects that 2023 occupancy was still ~69% relative to
81% in 2019. We also note that while ADR and RevPAR have recovered to be above pre-pandemic
levels, significant cost increases mean that profitability per bed remains significantly lower.
Figure 7: New Zealand Hotel Occupancy and Revenue
Source: Hotel Data New Zealand
2.4. Hotel Industry Outlook
The outlook for the New Zealand hotel sector remains positive on the back of an expected recovery in
international tourist arrivals and broader economic recovery which should support improved disposable
income levels and business travel. While there is increasing confidence in the sector outlook, it remains
susceptible to external shocks and any deterioration in the domestic and international economy.
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
-
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
201620172018201920202021202220232024
Number of stay units (lhs)Occupancy rate (rhs)
$193
$195
$168
$173
$228
$155
$94 $94
$78
$158
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
$-
$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
20192020202120222023
ADR (NZ$)RevPAR (NZ$)Occupancy (%)
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 12
Industry Overview
Figure 8: International Visitor Arrivals (Million) – Actuals and TECNZ Forecast
Source: StatsNZ Visitor Arrivals, TECNZ International Arrivals Forecast January 2025.
Figure 8 highlights forecast international tourism arrivals are expected to recover to pre-pandemic
levels by 2027. This is expected to be supported by the recovery in key markets including Australia,
China, the USA and Europe.
Domestic tourism and business travel is also expected to support growing demand for hotel rooms
driven by stabilising costs, the expected easing in interest rates and the consequent improvement in
disposable incomes. This trend is also expected to be supported by increasing number of international
artists playing at New Zealand stadia, the opening of the Christchurch stadium and increasing levels of
convention centre demand.
Increased confidence in the sector has also been demonstrated through the construction of new hotels
or expansion of existing hotels (including MCK’s refurbishment and release of additional rooms in the
last 2 years). Much of the new room supply since 2019 has been driven by the large global operators
including IHG and Wyndham as well as Sudima.
2.5. Residential Property Market
CDI’s business has no exposure to the New Zealand hotel market. Its performance and earnings are
influenced by the residential property market, particularly the market for new homes in residential
subdivisions. The key factors driving the residential property market largely relate to domestic economic
factors including population growth, interest rates, employment and income levels, the availability of
credit (influenced by bank lending restrictions such as loan to value ratios) and the costs of building a
new home.
Recent trends for some of these economic indicators are summarised in Figure 9. These show that
while house construction cost growth has exceeded income growth over the last 10 years, near 0%
interest rates were a key contributor to the increased investment in section sales and new homes (and
house prices) post Covid-19. Other factors which impact on new section sales include the availability of
land, zoning changes (i.e. rural to residential) and council consenting.
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
Mar-18Mar-19Mar-20Mar-21Mar-22Mar-23Mar-24Mar-25Mar-26Mar-27
Millions
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 11
Industry Overview
Figure 6: National Hotel Room Availability and Occupancy
Sources: StatsNZ Accommodation Survey (to September 2019), MBIE Accommodation Data Programme (from June 2020).
As shown in Figure 7, the impact of reduced demand in the early stage of the pandemic recovery can
be observed in the ADR charged by hotels and the changes in RevPAR. While hotels have since
increased ADRs in response to increased demand and cost pressures, RevPAR was only marginally
above 2019 levels in 2023 ($158 vs $155). This reflects that 2023 occupancy was still ~69% relative to
81% in 2019. We also note that while ADR and RevPAR have recovered to be above pre-pandemic
levels, significant cost increases mean that profitability per bed remains significantly lower.
Figure 7: New Zealand Hotel Occupancy and Revenue
Source: Hotel Data New Zealand
2.4. Hotel Industry Outlook
The outlook for the New Zealand hotel sector remains positive on the back of an expected recovery in
international tourist arrivals and broader economic recovery which should support improved disposable
income levels and business travel. While there is increasing confidence in the sector outlook, it remains
susceptible to external shocks and any deterioration in the domestic and international economy.
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
-
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
201620172018201920202021202220232024
Number of stay units (lhs)Occupancy rate (rhs)
$193
$195
$168
$173
$228
$155
$94 $94
$78
$158
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
$-
$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
20192020202120222023
ADR (NZ$)RevPAR (NZ$)Occupancy (%)
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 12
Industry Overview
Figure 8: International Visitor Arrivals (Million) – Actuals and TECNZ Forecast
Source: StatsNZ Visitor Arrivals, TECNZ International Arrivals Forecast January 2025.
Figure 8 highlights forecast international tourism arrivals are expected to recover to pre-pandemic
levels by 2027. This is expected to be supported by the recovery in key markets including Australia,
China, the USA and Europe.
Domestic tourism and business travel is also expected to support growing demand for hotel rooms
driven by stabilising costs, the expected easing in interest rates and the consequent improvement in
disposable incomes. This trend is also expected to be supported by increasing number of international
artists playing at New Zealand stadia, the opening of the Christchurch stadium and increasing levels of
convention centre demand.
Increased confidence in the sector has also been demonstrated through the construction of new hotels
or expansion of existing hotels (including MCK’s refurbishment and release of additional rooms in the
last 2 years). Much of the new room supply since 2019 has been driven by the large global operators
including IHG and Wyndham as well as Sudima.
2.5. Residential Property Market
CDI’s business has no exposure to the New Zealand hotel market. Its performance and earnings are
influenced by the residential property market, particularly the market for new homes in residential
subdivisions. The key factors driving the residential property market largely relate to domestic economic
factors including population growth, interest rates, employment and income levels, the availability of
credit (influenced by bank lending restrictions such as loan to value ratios) and the costs of building a
new home.
Recent trends for some of these economic indicators are summarised in Figure 9. These show that
while house construction cost growth has exceeded income growth over the last 10 years, near 0%
interest rates were a key contributor to the increased investment in section sales and new homes (and
house prices) post Covid-19. Other factors which impact on new section sales include the availability of
land, zoning changes (i.e. rural to residential) and council consenting.
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
Mar-18Mar-19Mar-20Mar-21Mar-22Mar-23Mar-24Mar-25Mar-26Mar-27
Millions
APPENDIX: INDEPENDENT ADVISER’S REPORT
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 13
Industry Overview
Figure 9: Economic Indicators (2014 – 2024)
Household Income Levels
(individual average annual
earnings, $k)
Interest Rates (5-year bank swap
rate)
New Residential Property
Construction Costs ($/sqm)
Source: Stats NZ (quarterly data for household incomes and residential construction costs to Q4 2024), IRESS. Home
construction costs based on council consent data (value and area of consented new homes).
Figure 10 shows the number of historical residential section sales in the key regions in which CDI
operates (Auckland, Canterbury and Waikato) over the last 10 years (by quarter). Key take-outs from
this data include:
− Over 2015 and 2016 section sales in the Auckland region broadly fluctuated between 600 –
900 per quarter while the Canterbury and Waikato regions were around 500 – 700 per quarter.
Section sales in all regions slowed over the 2017 – 2019 period with Auckland around 500 –
700 and Canterbury and Waikato around the 500 section sales per quarter level;
− The fall-out from Covid-19 generated a significant spike in new residential section sales fuelled
by cheap credit and government stimuli. New residential section sales spiked to over 1,200 in
the 4
th
quarter of 2020 in the Auckland region, over 1,000 in Canterbury and almost 900 in
Waikato; and
− Following the post Covid-19 boom, Canterbury section sales are averaging around 400 per
quarter while Auckland is around 250 per quarter and Waikato sales are around 330 per
quarter, with all regions significantly below pre-2018 levels.
Figure 10: New Zealand Residential Section Sales by Number by Region (Quarterly, 2015 - 2024)
Source: REINZ
The broader outlook for the residential property market remains subdued but is expected to improve
during 2025 following reductions in mortgage interest rates, the stabilisation of construction costs and
growing consumer confidence and income levels.
$40
$45
$50
$55
$60
$65
$70
$75
$80
20142015201620172018201920202021202220232024
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
20142015201620172018201920202021202220232024
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
$3,500
20142015201620172018201920202021202220232024
6.4% CAGR
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
Qtr1Qtr2Qtr3Qtr4Qtr1Qtr2Qtr3Qtr4Qtr1Qtr2Qtr3Qtr4Qtr1Qtr2Qtr3Qtr4Qtr1Qtr2Qtr3Qtr4Qtr1Qtr2Qtr3Qtr4Qtr1Qtr2Qtr3Qtr4Qtr1Qtr2Qtr3Qtr4Qtr1Qtr2Qtr3Qtr4Qtr1Qtr2Qtr3Qtr4
2015201620172018201920202021202220232024
Auckland RegionCanterbury RegionWaikato Region
4.3% CAGR
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 14
Profile of MCK
3.0 Profile of MCK
3.1. Overview of the Company
As summarised in Figure 11 below, the Company comprises four key business components:
- MCK:
1. NZ hotel ownership and operation, as well as franchised hotels (“NZ Hotels”)
2. Sofitel Brisbane Joint Venture (“Sofitel Brisbane JV”) and Sydney Zenith apartments
(“Sydney Apartments”).
- CDI:
3. Residential and commercial land development (“CDI Residential Land Development”).
4. Investment property ownership (“CDI Investment Property”).
Figure 11: Simplified Corporate Structure of MCK Group
MCK largely comprises MCK Group’s hotel operations. Hotel operators typically pursue a range of
operating models for the ownership and management of hotels. These models can vary between an
“asset heavy” approach in which the entity owns the real estate and operates the hotel, and an “asset
light” approach in which the hotel operator leases the hotel from the property owner or directly manages
the hotel on another entity’s behalf. The asset light model also extends to operators who franchise their
brand.
MCK predominantly operates an asset heavy model; it owns and manages 15 of its NZ Hotels (noting
Copthorne Bay of Islands is 49% owned and 26 rooms at Copthorne Lakeview are owned by
individuals) with 2 hotels managed and 2 franchised. In addition to the hotel properties, MCK owns
surplus land adjacent to four hotels (Queenstown, Te Anau, Palmerston North and Rotorua) as well as
a new land site acquired in Whangarei in 2024 for future hotel development.
Following the conversion of the former Kingsgate Millennium hotel in Sydney into a mixed use
residential and commercial complex completed in 2006, MCK has been in the process of selling the
apartment units. As of 31 December 2024, MCK owned 22 unsold apartments, 2 commercial suites, 14
carparks and 25 storage cages, with the majority currently being rented.
CDI represents MCK Group’s residential development activities and investment property interests.
3.2. MCK Hotels Portfolio
A summary of MCK’s hotels is set out in Table 3 with a location map presented in Figure 12.
MCK’s hotel strategy is to invest in and manage hotels for income and long-term capital growth. NZ
Hotels comprises 19 hotels with a total of 2,506 rooms while the Sofitel Brisbane has a further 416
rooms. MCK operates under seven different brands (including the recently acquired Sofitel Hotel in
Brisbane). Of these hotels:
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 13
Industry Overview
Figure 9: Economic Indicators (2014 – 2024)
Household Income Levels
(individual average annual
earnings, $k)
Interest Rates (5-year bank swap
rate)
New Residential Property
Construction Costs ($/sqm)
Source: Stats NZ (quarterly data for household incomes and residential construction costs to Q4 2024), IRESS. Home
construction costs based on council consent data (value and area of consented new homes).
Figure 10 shows the number of historical residential section sales in the key regions in which CDI
operates (Auckland, Canterbury and Waikato) over the last 10 years (by quarter). Key take-outs from
this data include:
− Over 2015 and 2016 section sales in the Auckland region broadly fluctuated between 600 –
900 per quarter while the Canterbury and Waikato regions were around 500 – 700 per quarter.
Section sales in all regions slowed over the 2017 – 2019 period with Auckland around 500 –
700 and Canterbury and Waikato around the 500 section sales per quarter level;
− The fall-out from Covid-19 generated a significant spike in new residential section sales fuelled
by cheap credit and government stimuli. New residential section sales spiked to over 1,200 in
the 4
th
quarter of 2020 in the Auckland region, over 1,000 in Canterbury and almost 900 in
Waikato; and
− Following the post Covid-19 boom, Canterbury section sales are averaging around 400 per
quarter while Auckland is around 250 per quarter and Waikato sales are around 330 per
quarter, with all regions significantly below pre-2018 levels.
Figure 10: New Zealand Residential Section Sales by Number by Region (Quarterly, 2015 - 2024)
Source: REINZ
The broader outlook for the residential property market remains subdued but is expected to improve
during 2025 following reductions in mortgage interest rates, the stabilisation of construction costs and
growing consumer confidence and income levels.
$40
$45
$50
$55
$60
$65
$70
$75
$80
20142015201620172018201920202021202220232024
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
20142015201620172018201920202021202220232024
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
$3,500
20142015201620172018201920202021202220232024
6.4% CAGR
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
Qtr1Qtr2Qtr3Qtr4Qtr1Qtr2Qtr3Qtr4Qtr1Qtr2Qtr3Qtr4Qtr1Qtr2Qtr3Qtr4Qtr1Qtr2Qtr3Qtr4Qtr1Qtr2Qtr3Qtr4Qtr1Qtr2Qtr3Qtr4Qtr1Qtr2Qtr3Qtr4Qtr1Qtr2Qtr3Qtr4Qtr1Qtr2Qtr3Qtr4
2015201620172018201920202021202220232024
Auckland RegionCanterbury RegionWaikato Region
4.3% CAGR
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 14
Profile of MCK
3.0 Profile of MCK
3.1. Overview of the Company
As summarised in Figure 11 below, the Company comprises four key business components:
- MCK:
1. NZ hotel ownership and operation, as well as franchised hotels (“NZ Hotels”)
2. Sofitel Brisbane Joint Venture (“Sofitel Brisbane JV”) and Sydney Zenith apartments
(“Sydney Apartments”).
- CDI:
3. Residential and commercial land development (“CDI Residential Land Development”).
4. Investment property ownership (“CDI Investment Property”).
Figure 11: Simplified Corporate Structure of MCK Group
MCK largely comprises MCK Group’s hotel operations. Hotel operators typically pursue a range of
operating models for the ownership and management of hotels. These models can vary between an
“asset heavy” approach in which the entity owns the real estate and operates the hotel, and an “asset
light” approach in which the hotel operator leases the hotel from the property owner or directly manages
the hotel on another entity’s behalf. The asset light model also extends to operators who franchise their
brand.
MCK predominantly operates an asset heavy model; it owns and manages 15 of its NZ Hotels (noting
Copthorne Bay of Islands is 49% owned and 26 rooms at Copthorne Lakeview are owned by
individuals) with 2 hotels managed and 2 franchised. In addition to the hotel properties, MCK owns
surplus land adjacent to four hotels (Queenstown, Te Anau, Palmerston North and Rotorua) as well as
a new land site acquired in Whangarei in 2024 for future hotel development.
Following the conversion of the former Kingsgate Millennium hotel in Sydney into a mixed use
residential and commercial complex completed in 2006, MCK has been in the process of selling the
apartment units. As of 31 December 2024, MCK owned 22 unsold apartments, 2 commercial suites, 14
carparks and 25 storage cages, with the majority currently being rented.
CDI represents MCK Group’s residential development activities and investment property interests.
3.2. MCK Hotels Portfolio
A summary of MCK’s hotels is set out in Table 3 with a location map presented in Figure 12.
MCK’s hotel strategy is to invest in and manage hotels for income and long-term capital growth. NZ
Hotels comprises 19 hotels with a total of 2,506 rooms while the Sofitel Brisbane has a further 416
rooms. MCK operates under seven different brands (including the recently acquired Sofitel Hotel in
Brisbane). Of these hotels:
APPENDIX: INDEPENDENT ADVISER’S REPORT
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 15
Profile of MCK
- MCK owns 12 of these hotel properties on a freehold basis with long-term leasehold
agreements on a further 3 properties (Copthorne Auckland, Copthorne Bay of Islands and
Copthorne Greymouth);
- Two hotels are owned and operated by third-parties under franchise arrangements;
- MCK manages two hotels owned by third-parties; and
- The Sofitel Hotel in Brisbane is 50% owned by MCK through a joint-venture and is managed
by the Accor Group.
Table 3: MCK Hotel Portfolio
Location Brand # Rooms Operating Model
Queenstown Copthorne 240 Owned
Rotorua Millennium 228 Owned
Queenstown Millenium 220 Owned
Auckland M Social 190 Owned
Bay of Islands Copthorne 180 49% Owned (JV)
Rotorua Copthorne 58
3
Owned
Wellington Copthorne 118 Owned
Auckland Copthorne 106 Owned
Queenstown Copthorne 85 ~ 64% Owned
Palmerston North Copthorne 76 Owned
Te Anau Kingsgate 69 Owned
Christchurch The Mayfair 67 Owned
Dunedin Kingsgate 55 Owned
Greymouth Copthorne 53 Owned
New Plymouth Millennium 42 Owned
Auckland Grand Millennium 453 Managed
Paihia Kingsgate 113 Managed
Wairarapa Copthorne 102 Franchised
Taupo Millennium 51 Franchised
Total NZ Hotels 2,506
Brisbane Central Sofitel 416 50% Owned (JV)
Sources: MCK Annual Report 2023, website and Company announcements.
3
Although Copthorne Rotorua has 136 rooms available, only 58 are currently utilised.
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 16
Profile of MCK
Figure 12: NZ Hotels Locations
Sources: MCK Annual Report 2023, website and Company Announcements.
3.3. CDL Investments
MCK owns 65.31% of the NZX listed CDL Investments New Zealand Limited (“CDI”). The company is
primarily engaged in the acquisition, development and sale of residential land in New Zealand. In
addition to the primary land development functions, CDI also engages in commercial development and
investment. CDI has operated in New Zealand for nearly 30 years. From 2018-2023, CDI developed
and sold over 900 residential sections and over the last 20 years has completed numerous subdivisions
in Auckland, Hamilton, Tauranga, Hastings, Havelock North, Taupo, Nelson, Christchurch and
Queenstown.
As shown in Figure 13 below, CDI’s residential property development portfolio spans over 280 hectares
across 14 sites. These projects are expected to deliver a total of over 3,000 sections along with up to
19 additional investment properties.
Millenium
M Collection
Copthorne
Kingsgate
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 15
Profile of MCK
- MCK owns 12 of these hotel properties on a freehold basis with long-term leasehold
agreements on a further 3 properties (Copthorne Auckland, Copthorne Bay of Islands and
Copthorne Greymouth);
- Two hotels are owned and operated by third-parties under franchise arrangements;
- MCK manages two hotels owned by third-parties; and
- The Sofitel Hotel in Brisbane is 50% owned by MCK through a joint-venture and is managed
by the Accor Group.
Table 3: MCK Hotel Portfolio
Location Brand # Rooms Operating Model
Queenstown Copthorne 240 Owned
Rotorua Millennium 228 Owned
Queenstown Millenium 220 Owned
Auckland M Social 190 Owned
Bay of Islands Copthorne 180 49% Owned (JV)
Rotorua Copthorne 58
3
Owned
Wellington Copthorne 118 Owned
Auckland Copthorne 106 Owned
Queenstown Copthorne 85 ~ 64% Owned
Palmerston North Copthorne 76 Owned
Te Anau Kingsgate 69 Owned
Christchurch The Mayfair 67 Owned
Dunedin Kingsgate 55 Owned
Greymouth Copthorne 53 Owned
New Plymouth Millennium 42 Owned
Auckland Grand Millennium 453 Managed
Paihia Kingsgate 113 Managed
Wairarapa Copthorne 102 Franchised
Taupo Millennium 51 Franchised
Total NZ Hotels 2,506
Brisbane Central Sofitel 416 50% Owned (JV)
Sources: MCK Annual Report 2023, website and Company announcements.
3
Although Copthorne Rotorua has 136 rooms available, only 58 are currently utilised.
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 16
Profile of MCK
Figure 12: NZ Hotels Locations
Sources: MCK Annual Report 2023, website and Company Announcements.
3.3. CDL Investments
MCK owns 65.31% of the NZX listed CDL Investments New Zealand Limited (“CDI”). The company is
primarily engaged in the acquisition, development and sale of residential land in New Zealand. In
addition to the primary land development functions, CDI also engages in commercial development and
investment. CDI has operated in New Zealand for nearly 30 years. From 2018-2023, CDI developed
and sold over 900 residential sections and over the last 20 years has completed numerous subdivisions
in Auckland, Hamilton, Tauranga, Hastings, Havelock North, Taupo, Nelson, Christchurch and
Queenstown.
As shown in Figure 13 below, CDI’s residential property development portfolio spans over 280 hectares
across 14 sites. These projects are expected to deliver a total of over 3,000 sections along with up to
19 additional investment properties.
Millenium
M Collection
Copthorne
Kingsgate
APPENDIX: INDEPENDENT ADVISER’S REPORT
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 17
Profile of MCK
Figure 13: CDI Residential Development Portfolio
Source: CDI annual results and property searches.
CDI’s income is highly dependent on the overall residential property market, although EBITDA from
property development activities was greater than $40m per annum in the five years to FY22. With a
weakening property market, FY23 property sales slowed to less than one third of FY21 sales, resulting
in EBITDA of $13.7m from development activities.
CDI aims to diversify its revenue and earnings beyond the residential property market through the
development and ownership of commercial properties. In 2023, rental income from its two warehouses
and two retail spaces totalled $2.5 million, accounting for nearly 8% of the company’s total revenue.
CDI holds significant cash reserves and no debt.
3.4. Capital Structure and Ownership
MCK currently has 105,478,743 ordinary shares on issue, of which CDL currently holds 75.86%. There
are no other substantial security holders (those with a beneficial interest of 5% or more).
MCK has also issued 52,739,543 non-voting RPS, with CDL currently holding 91.34%. The RPS rank
equally with ordinary shares with respect to all distributions made by the Company (including without
limitation, to dividend payments) except for any distributions made in the context of a liquidation of the
Company (see Section 4.2 for further information on the RPS).
MCK has historically maintained a conservative debt profile, funding its growth primarily through
retained earnings and cash reserves. In recent years, the company has actively reduced its debt, with
total Group net cash of $38m as of 31 December 2024 (although the MCK has subsequently drawn
debt to fund the $31.9m purchase of Mayfair Christchurch).
3.5. Share Price Performance
Figure 14 illustrates MCK’s share price performance for the period between 1 January 2022 and 3
February 2025. As at 17 January 2025 (prior to CDL’s announcement of the Offer), MCK’s share price
was $1.80, representing a 52% discount to reported NAV of $3.46 per share as of 31 December 2024.
Hawkes Bay
Arataki
Iona
Hamilton
R2 Growth Cell
(Puketaha)
Christchurch / Rolleston
Prestons Park
Worsleys Road
Stonebrook
Wairakei Road
Nelson
Lucas Terrace
Highland Drive
Auckland
Roscommon Road
Hobsonville Road
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 18
Profile of MCK
Figure 14: MCK Share Price and associated trading volume (1 Jan 2022 to 3 Feb 2025)
Sources: CapitalIQ. Note: Volume excludes the 5.27 m shares purchased by the Offeror on 29 October 2024.
3.6. Share Liquidity
With over 75% of the outstanding MCK ordinary shares and over 90% of the RPS held by CDL, the
shares on issue in MCK are thinly traded and have poor liquidity.
The trading volume for MCK’s ordinary shares over a number of periods is summarised in Table 4.
Average daily volume in all of the selected periods is very low, ranging between about 1,860 and 6,300
shares per day. The total number of shares traded over the last year (~761k) represents less than 1%
of the total shares on issue and ~3% of the free-float shares (excluding CDL’s shareholding). Bid-ask
spreads have also averaged $0.06, or approximately 3% of the share price since January 2022.
This low liquidity will be a large deterrent to institutional investors and larger market participants, as
executing large trades without significantly moving the share price is likely to be difficult. The absence
of active institutional investors and the limited presence of engaged investors is evident in the lack of
analyst coverage, even when adjusting for market capitalisation.
Table 4: Share Trading History for MCK Ordinary Shares (to 17 January 2025)
30 Days 3 Month 1 Year 3 Year
Total Volume 37,133 317,494 761,097 4,728,244
Average Daily Volume 1,857 5,121 3,020 6,296
Volume as % of free float shares
(excluding CDL shareholding)
0.1% 1.2% 3.0% 18.6%
VWAP $1.75 $1.81 $1.80 $2.00
High Price $1.90 $1.90 $1.95 $2.57
Low Price $1.70 $1.70 $1.66 $1.66
Sources: CapitalIQ. Note: Volume excludes the 5.27m shares purchased by the Offeror on 29 October 2024. Free float shares based
on current shares on issue excluding CDL’s shareholding.
-
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
700,000
$1.00
$1.50
$2.00
$2.50
$3.00
Jan-22Jul-22Jan-23Jul-23Jan-24Jul-24Jan-25
Volume (rhs)Share Price (lhs)
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 17
Profile of MCK
Figure 13: CDI Residential Development Portfolio
Source: CDI annual results and property searches.
CDI’s income is highly dependent on the overall residential property market, although EBITDA from
property development activities was greater than $40m per annum in the five years to FY22. With a
weakening property market, FY23 property sales slowed to less than one third of FY21 sales, resulting
in EBITDA of $13.7m from development activities.
CDI aims to diversify its revenue and earnings beyond the residential property market through the
development and ownership of commercial properties. In 2023, rental income from its two warehouses
and two retail spaces totalled $2.5 million, accounting for nearly 8% of the company’s total revenue.
CDI holds significant cash reserves and no debt.
3.4. Capital Structure and Ownership
MCK currently has 105,478,743 ordinary shares on issue, of which CDL currently holds 75.86%. There
are no other substantial security holders (those with a beneficial interest of 5% or more).
MCK has also issued 52,739,543 non-voting RPS, with CDL currently holding 91.34%. The RPS rank
equally with ordinary shares with respect to all distributions made by the Company (including without
limitation, to dividend payments) except for any distributions made in the context of a liquidation of the
Company (see Section 4.2 for further information on the RPS).
MCK has historically maintained a conservative debt profile, funding its growth primarily through
retained earnings and cash reserves. In recent years, the company has actively reduced its debt, with
total Group net cash of $38m as of 31 December 2024 (although the MCK has subsequently drawn
debt to fund the $31.9m purchase of Mayfair Christchurch).
3.5. Share Price Performance
Figure 14 illustrates MCK’s share price performance for the period between 1 January 2022 and 3
February 2025. As at 17 January 2025 (prior to CDL’s announcement of the Offer), MCK’s share price
was $1.80, representing a 52% discount to reported NAV of $3.46 per share as of 31 December 2024.
Hawkes Bay
Arataki
Iona
Hamilton
R2 Growth Cell
(Puketaha)
Christchurch / Rolleston
Prestons Park
Worsleys Road
Stonebrook
Wairakei Road
Nelson
Lucas Terrace
Highland Drive
Auckland
Roscommon Road
Hobsonville Road
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 18
Profile of MCK
Figure 14: MCK Share Price and associated trading volume (1 Jan 2022 to 3 Feb 2025)
Sources: CapitalIQ. Note: Volume excludes the 5.27 m shares purchased by the Offeror on 29 October 2024.
3.6. Share Liquidity
With over 75% of the outstanding MCK ordinary shares and over 90% of the RPS held by CDL, the
shares on issue in MCK are thinly traded and have poor liquidity.
The trading volume for MCK’s ordinary shares over a number of periods is summarised in Table 4.
Average daily volume in all of the selected periods is very low, ranging between about 1,860 and 6,300
shares per day. The total number of shares traded over the last year (~761k) represents less than 1%
of the total shares on issue and ~3% of the free-float shares (excluding CDL’s shareholding). Bid-ask
spreads have also averaged $0.06, or approximately 3% of the share price since January 2022.
This low liquidity will be a large deterrent to institutional investors and larger market participants, as
executing large trades without significantly moving the share price is likely to be difficult. The absence
of active institutional investors and the limited presence of engaged investors is evident in the lack of
analyst coverage, even when adjusting for market capitalisation.
Table 4: Share Trading History for MCK Ordinary Shares (to 17 January 2025)
30 Days 3 Month 1 Year 3 Year
Total Volume 37,133 317,494 761,097 4,728,244
Average Daily Volume 1,857 5,121 3,020 6,296
Volume as % of free float shares
(excluding CDL shareholding)
0.1% 1.2% 3.0% 18.6%
VWAP $1.75 $1.81 $1.80 $2.00
High Price $1.90 $1.90 $1.95 $2.57
Low Price $1.70 $1.70 $1.66 $1.66
Sources: CapitalIQ. Note: Volume excludes the 5.27m shares purchased by the Offeror on 29 October 2024. Free float shares based
on current shares on issue excluding CDL’s shareholding.
-
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
700,000
$1.00
$1.50
$2.00
$2.50
$3.00
Jan-22Jul-22Jan-23Jul-23Jan-24Jul-24Jan-25
Volume (rhs)Share Price (lhs)
APPENDIX: INDEPENDENT ADVISER’S REPORT
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 19
Profile of MCK
3.7. Summary Financial Results
3.7.1. Financial Performance
A summary of MCK’s recent financial performance is set out in Table 5 below for the period from FY22
to FY24.
Table 5: Historical Financial Performance - Years Ending 31 December ($m)
Income Statement (MCK Segment Reporting) FY22 FY23
FY24
Hotel Operations 65.2 101.1 109.5
Residential Land Development 66.1 28.3 46.3
Investment Property 1.2 2.5
2.7
Residential Property Development 11.6 13.8 17.6
Revenue 144.2 145.7 176.2
Cost of Sales (59.7) (67.9) (78.3)
Gross Profit 84.5 77.8 97.9
Administrative Expenses (22.7) (25.5)
(29.8)
Other Operating Expenses (10.3) (11.4)
(17.0)
EBITDA 51.6 40.8
51.1
Finance Income 3.9 7.7 5.3
Finance Costs (2.3) (2.4)
(2.2)
Net Finance Income 1.5 5.3 3.1
Depreciation & Amortisation (8.3) (8.7) (8.6)
Share of Profit of Joint Venture - 0.1 1.5
Profit before Income Tax 44.78 37.5
47.1
Income Tax Expense (12.4) (10.6) (38.3)
Net Profit after Tax 32.4 26.9
8.8
Source: MCK annual reports and FY24 financial results based on segment results. Totals may not sum due to rounding.
MCK’s financial results reflect the consolidated results for MCK and CDI because of MCK’s controlling
interest in CDI. In order to illustrate the relative contributions from the respective businesses over a
period that captures performance both before and after Covid-19, Figure 15 summarises MCK Group
EBITDA by segment.
Figure 15: Summary of Historical EBITDA By Segment ($m)
Source: MCK annual reports and FY24 financial results. Note: includes minority interests but excludes Sofitel Brisbane JV.
$43.8
$43.4
$14.6
$22.9
$4.8
$19.3
$17.4
$45.1
$46.4
$40.8
$42.9
$41.4
$13.7
$22.3
$2.4
$4.1
$6.8
$7.0
$4.6
$5.4
$8.8
$91.3
$94.0
$62.2
$72.8
$51.6
$40.8
$51.1
$0
$20
$40
$60
$80
$100
FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24
Hotel OperationsResidential Land Development
Residential Property DevelopmentInvestment Property
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 20
Profile of MCK
The main features of MCK’s historic financial performance can be summarised as follows:
- MCK’s hotel operations represents the NZ Hotels and delivered over $40m of EBITDA in both
FY18 and FY19 prior to the impacts of Covid-19. The FY20 to FY22 results were significantly
impacted by lower occupancy as a consequence of the pandemic which also impacted on
room rates due to industry oversupply. The slow recovery in the hotel segment can be
observed through FY23 and FY24, consistent with the broader industry.
- Residential land development and investment property EBITDA represents CDI earnings.
CDI’s substantial portfolio of residential land property sales and the strong post-Covid-19
residential property market resulted in strong earnings from CDI’s property development
through to FY22 (EBITDA > $40m FY18 to FY22). The impact of the weaker property market
and lower levels of activity can be observed in the lower earnings for FY23 and FY24.
- MCK’s Sydney Apartment sales have more recently delivered annual earnings of between
$4.6 and $8.8m of EBITDA. With 22 apartments remaining (as of 31 December 2024), the
contribution to earnings beyond FY26 from this component is expected to be eliminated.
3.7.2. Financial Position
A summary of MCK’s recent financial position is set out in Table 6.
Table 6: Historical Financial Position - Years Ending 31 December ($m)
Balance Sheet as of: FY22 FY23 FY24
Total Cash & ST Investments 173 75 41
Trade and Other Receivables 14 20 23
Inventories 1 2 2
Development Properties 23 27 35
Advances to Related Parties
4
- 63 65
Total Current Assets 212 187 167
Property, Plant & Equipment 255 263 283
Investment in Sofitel Brisbane JV - 44 47
Development Properties 205 217 229
Investment Properties 36 36 36
Total Non-Current Assets 497 560 595
Total Assets 709 747 762
Interest-bearing Loans and Borrowings - 12 -
Trade and Other Payables 28 32 31
Income Tax Payable 1 3 2
Other Current Liabilities 2 3 2
Total Current Liabilities 31 50 35
Interest-bearing Loans and Borrowings - - 3
Lease Liability 25 27 27
Deferred Tax 10 7 33
Total Non-Current Liabilities 35 34 62
Total Liabilities 66 84 97
Net Assets 643 662 665
Issued Capital 383 383 383
Reserves 149 166 165
Treasury Stock (1) (1) (0)
4
Includes advance to Sofitel Brisbane JV of $62.2 million as of 31 Dec 2023 and $63.7 million as of 31 Dec 2024.
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 19
Profile of MCK
3.7. Summary Financial Results
3.7.1. Financial Performance
A summary of MCK’s recent financial performance is set out in Table 5 below for the period from FY22
to FY24.
Table 5: Historical Financial Performance - Years Ending 31 December ($m)
Income Statement (MCK Segment Reporting) FY22 FY23 FY24
Hotel Operations 65.2 101.1 109.5
Residential Land Development 66.1 28.3 46.3
Investment Property 1.2 2.5 2.7
Residential Property Development 11.6 13.8 17.6
Revenue 144.2 145.7 176.2
Cost of Sales (59.7) (67.9) (78.3)
Gross Profit 84.5 77.8 97.9
Administrative Expenses (22.7) (25.5) (29.8)
Other Operating Expenses (10.3) (11.4) (17.0)
EBITDA 51.6 40.8 51.1
Finance Income 3.9 7.7 5.3
Finance Costs (2.3) (2.4) (2.2)
Net Finance Income 1.5 5.3 3.1
Depreciation & Amortisation (8.3) (8.7) (8.6)
Share of Profit of Joint Venture - 0.1 1.5
Profit before Income Tax 44.78 37.5 47.1
Income Tax Expense (12.4) (10.6) (38.3)
Net Profit after Tax 32.4 26.9 8.8
Source: MCK annual reports and FY24 financial results based on segment results. Totals may not sum due to rounding.
MCK’s financial results reflect the consolidated results for MCK and CDI because of MCK’s controlling
interest in CDI. In order to illustrate the relative contributions from the respective businesses over a
period that captures performance both before and after Covid-19, Figure 15 summarises MCK Group
EBITDA by segment.
Figure 15: Summary of Historical EBITDA By Segment ($m)
Source: MCK annual reports and FY24 financial results. Note: includes minority interests but excludes Sofitel Brisbane JV.
$43.8
$43.4
$14.6
$22.9
$4.8
$19.3
$17.4
$45.1
$46.4
$40.8
$42.9
$41.4
$13.7
$22.3
$2.4
$4.1
$6.8
$7.0
$4.6
$5.4
$8.8
$91.3
$94.0
$62.2
$72.8
$51.6
$40.8
$51.1
$0
$20
$40
$60
$80
$100
FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24
Hotel OperationsResidential Land Development
Residential Property DevelopmentInvestment Property
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 20
Profile of MCK
The main features of MCK’s historic financial performance can be summarised as follows:
- MCK’s hotel operations represents the NZ Hotels and delivered over $40m of EBITDA in both
FY18 and FY19 prior to the impacts of Covid-19. The FY20 to FY22 results were significantly
impacted by lower occupancy as a consequence of the pandemic which also impacted on
room rates due to industry oversupply. The slow recovery in the hotel segment can be
observed through FY23 and FY24, consistent with the broader industry.
- Residential land development and investment property EBITDA represents CDI earnings.
CDI’s substantial portfolio of residential land property sales and the strong post-Covid-19
residential property market resulted in strong earnings from CDI’s property development
through to FY22 (EBITDA > $40m FY18 to FY22). The impact of the weaker property market
and lower levels of activity can be observed in the lower earnings for FY23 and FY24.
- MCK’s Sydney Apartment sales have more recently delivered annual earnings of between
$4.6 and $8.8m of EBITDA. With 22 apartments remaining (as of 31 December 2024), the
contribution to earnings beyond FY26 from this component is expected to be eliminated.
3.7.2. Financial Position
A summary of MCK’s recent financial position is set out in Table 6.
Table 6: Historical Financial Position - Years Ending 31 December ($m)
Balance Sheet as of: FY22 FY23 FY24
Total Cash & ST Investments 173 75 41
Trade and Other Receivables 14 20 23
Inventories 1 2 2
Development Properties 23 27 35
Advances to Related Parties
4
- 63 65
Total Current Assets 212 187 167
Property, Plant & Equipment 255 263 283
Investment in Sofitel Brisbane JV - 44 47
Development Properties 205 217 229
Investment Properties 36 36 36
Total Non-Current Assets 497 560 595
Total Assets 709 747 762
Interest-bearing Loans and Borrowings - 12 -
Trade and Other Payables 28 32 31
Income Tax Payable 1 3 2
Other Current Liabilities 2 3 2
Total Current Liabilities 31 50 35
Interest-bearing Loans and Borrowings - - 3
Lease Liability 25 27 27
Deferred Tax 10 7 33
Total Non-Current Liabilities 35 34 62
Total Liabilities 66 84 97
Net Assets 643 662 665
Issued Capital 383 383 383
Reserves 149 166 165
Treasury Stock (1) (1) (0)
4
Includes advance to Sofitel Brisbane JV of $62.2 million as of 31 Dec 2023 and $63.7 million as of 31 Dec 2024.
APPENDIX: INDEPENDENT ADVISER’S REPORT
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 21
Profile of MCK
Equity Attributable to Owners of the Parent 531 548 548
Non-controlling Interests 112 115 117
Total Equity 643 662 665
Source: MCK annual reports and FY24 financial results. Totals may not sum due to rounding.
Key features of MCK’s consolidated historic financial position include:
- The majority of MCK’s operating assets relate to its hotel properties and the investment in
residential development land and commercial properties held through CDI. These assets are
recorded at historic cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment losses. The FY24
consolidated total carrying value of ~$665m (including the minority interests in CDI and the
$64m advance to Sofitel Brisbane JV) is considerably lower than their equivalent market value
of $1,069m (see Section 3.8).
- MCK has modest working capital requirements, primarily relating to the operation of the hotel
business.
- MCK records lease liabilities related to long-term land leases for hotel sites, buildings, and
motor vehicles, which totalled $26.7 million at 31 December 2024.
- As at 31 December 2024, the company held $41 million in cash and short-term investments
and only ~$3m of drawn debt under its $120m bank facility. However, MCK settled on the
acquisition of Mayfair Christchurch in January 2025 and utilised another ~$30m of the
available bank facilities.
- MCK’s deferred tax liability primarily relates to the difference between the depreciation on
buildings for tax purposes and the values used for financial reporting purposes. The change in
tax treatment during FY24 which removed the ability to depreciate buildings resulted in a non-
cash increase in deferred tax liabilities of $25.8m.
- The Minority Interest largely relates to the 34.69% of CDI not owned by MCK. This value is
based on the carrying value of CDI’s properties which, as with MCK, are recorded at historical
cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment losses. The total of ~$117m also includes
MCK’s minority interests in Copthorne Bay of Islands and Copthorne Queenstown Lakeview.
3.7.3. Cash Flow
MCK’s cash flow statement is presented in Table 7.
Table 7: Historical Cash Flow Statement - Years Ending 31 December ($m)
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows FY22 FY23
FY24
Receipts from customers 146 142 172
Interest received (paid) 3 8
5
Payments to suppliers and employees (85) (100)
(126)
Purchases of development land (25) (20)
(24)
Income tax paid (14) (11)
(14)
Net cash inflow/(outflow) from operating activities 26 20
14
Purchases of property, plant and equipment (7) (14) (28)
Purchases of investment property (14) (0)
(1)
Investment in joint venture - (44)
-
Advance to joint venture - (62)
-
Divestments in short term bank deposits 10 48
63
Net cash inflow/(outflow) from investing activities (11) (72)
33
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 22
Profile of MCK
Drawdown/(Repayment) of borrowings (1) 12 (9)
Lease payments (3) (2) (2)
Dividends paid to shareholders of MCK (6) (5) (5)
Dividends paid to non-controlling shareholders (4) (4) (5)
Net cash inflow/(outflow) from financing activities (14) 1 (20)
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 1 (52) 26
Add opening cash and cash equivalents 58 61 11
Exchange rate adjustment 2 2 2
Closing cash and cash equivalents 61 11 40
Source: MCK Annual Reports and FY24 financial results. Totals may not sum due to rounding.
The main features of MCK’s historic cash flow performance can be summarised as follows:
- Total cash receipts include the sale of residential property by CDI and MCK. As a result of the
weak property market in 2023, sales of residential land by CDI reduced significantly. Receipts
from customers recovered in 2024 as a result of strengthening hotel performance and an
increase in sales of residential property.
- Payments to suppliers and employees relate primarily to hotel operations.
- Purchases of development land is that undertaken by CDI. Purchases of property, plant, and
equipment relates to purchases by MCK related to hotels and associated assets.
- The investment in, and advance to, the joint venture in FY23 relates to the purchase of the
Sofitel Brisbane JV.
3.8. Market Value of Properties
3.8.1. MCK Property Portfolio
Prior to 2021, MCK reported the value of its hotel assets at fair market value. In 2021, the company
changed its accounting policy and now reports its assets at historical cost. As result of this change, the
reported value of hotel land and buildings owned by MCK reduced from $630m to $273m. Figure 16
summarises the market value and book value (historic cost less accumulated depreciation and
impairment losses) for MCK Group’s properties since 2020.
Figure 16: Market Value and Book Value of MCK and CDI Properties
Sources: MCK annual reports (including restated 2020 accounts) and FY24 financial results; CDI annual reports and FY24 financial
results; and third-party 2024 valuations as outlined below. Figure does not include The Mayfair Hotel (settled on 22 January 2025).
$630
$273
$629
$259
$589
$255
$719
$361
$646
$377
$193
$109
$238
$139
$267
$158
$270
$171
$276
$188
$0
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
Market
Value
Book
Value
Market
Value
Book
Value
Market
Value
Book
Value
Market
Value
Book
Value
Market
Value
Book
Value
20202021202220232024
MCK Hotels & Share of AustraliaCDL Properties (less minority interests)
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 21
Profile of MCK
Equity Attributable to Owners of the Parent 531 548 548
Non-controlling Interests 112 115 117
Total Equity 643 662 665
Source: MCK annual reports and FY24 financial results. Totals may not sum due to rounding.
Key features of MCK’s consolidated historic financial position include:
- The majority of MCK’s operating assets relate to its hotel properties and the investment in
residential development land and commercial properties held through CDI. These assets are
recorded at historic cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment losses. The FY24
consolidated total carrying value of ~$665m (including the minority interests in CDI and the
$64m advance to Sofitel Brisbane JV) is considerably lower than their equivalent market value
of $1,069m (see Section 3.8).
- MCK has modest working capital requirements, primarily relating to the operation of the hotel
business.
- MCK records lease liabilities related to long-term land leases for hotel sites, buildings, and
motor vehicles, which totalled $26.7 million at 31 December 2024.
- As at 31 December 2024, the company held $41 million in cash and short-term investments
and only ~$3m of drawn debt under its $120m bank facility. However, MCK settled on the
acquisition of Mayfair Christchurch in January 2025 and utilised another ~$30m of the
available bank facilities.
- MCK’s deferred tax liability primarily relates to the difference between the depreciation on
buildings for tax purposes and the values used for financial reporting purposes. The change in
tax treatment during FY24 which removed the ability to depreciate buildings resulted in a non-
cash increase in deferred tax liabilities of $25.8m.
- The Minority Interest largely relates to the 34.69% of CDI not owned by MCK. This value is
based on the carrying value of CDI’s properties which, as with MCK, are recorded at historical
cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment losses. The total of ~$117m also includes
MCK’s minority interests in Copthorne Bay of Islands and Copthorne Queenstown Lakeview.
3.7.3. Cash Flow
MCK’s cash flow statement is presented in Table 7.
Table 7: Historical Cash Flow Statement - Years Ending 31 December ($m)
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows FY22 FY23 FY24
Receipts from customers 146 142 172
Interest received (paid) 3 8 5
Payments to suppliers and employees (85) (100) (126)
Purchases of development land (25) (20) (24)
Income tax paid (14) (11) (14)
Net cash inflow/(outflow) from operating activities 26 20 14
Purchases of property, plant and equipment (7) (14) (28)
Purchases of investment property (14) (0) (1)
Investment in joint venture - (44) -
Advance to joint venture - (62) -
Divestments in short term bank deposits 10 48 63
Net cash inflow/(outflow) from investing activities (11) (72) 33
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 22
Profile of MCK
Drawdown/(Repayment) of borrowings (1) 12 (9)
Lease payments (3) (2)
(2)
Dividends paid to shareholders of MCK (6) (5)
(5)
Dividends paid to non-controlling shareholders (4) (4)
(5)
Net cash inflow/(outflow) from financing activities (14) 1
(20)
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 1 (52) 26
Add opening cash and cash equivalents 58 61
11
Exchange rate adjustment 2 2
2
Closing cash and cash equivalents 61 11 40
Source: MCK Annual Reports and FY24 financial results. Totals may not sum due to rounding.
The main features of MCK’s historic cash flow performance can be summarised as follows:
- Total cash receipts include the sale of residential property by CDI and MCK. As a result of the
weak property market in 2023, sales of residential land by CDI reduced significantly. Receipts
from customers recovered in 2024 as a result of strengthening hotel performance and an
increase in sales of residential property.
- Payments to suppliers and employees relate primarily to hotel operations.
- Purchases of development land is that undertaken by CDI. Purchases of property, plant, and
equipment relates to purchases by MCK related to hotels and associated assets.
- The investment in, and advance to, the joint venture in FY23 relates to the purchase of the
Sofitel Brisbane JV.
3.8. Market Value of Properties
3.8.1. MCK Property Portfolio
Prior to 2021, MCK reported the value of its hotel assets at fair market value. In 2021, the company
changed its accounting policy and now reports its assets at historical cost. As result of this change, the
reported value of hotel land and buildings owned by MCK reduced from $630m to $273m. Figure 16
summarises the market value and book value (historic cost less accumulated depreciation and
impairment losses) for MCK Group’s properties since 2020.
Figure 16: Market Value and Book Value of MCK and CDI Properties
Sources: MCK annual reports (including restated 2020 accounts) and FY24 financial results; CDI annual reports and FY24 financial
results; and third-party 2024 valuations as outlined below. Figure does not include The Mayfair Hotel (settled on 22 January 2025).
$630
$273
$629
$259
$589
$255
$719
$361
$646
$377
$193
$109
$238
$139
$267
$158
$270
$171
$276
$188
$0
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
Market
Value
Book
Value
Market
Value
Book
Value
Market
Value
Book
Value
Market
Value
Book
Value
Market
Value
Book
Value
20202021202220232024
MCK Hotels & Share of AustraliaCDL Properties (less minority interests)
APPENDIX: INDEPENDENT ADVISER’S REPORT
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 23
Profile of MCK
Although MCK no longer records the value of its hotels, developments and investment properties at fair
market value, these assets are periodically independently valued for impairment testing purposes.
These valuations are typically undertaken on a triennial rotating basis with all assets having been
revalued in the last three years. However, following the Offer from CDL, MCK’s valuers have provided
desktop valuation updates for all of the Group’s key property assets that were not valued as part of the
ordinary cycle ending on 31 December 2024. Table 8 summarises the most recent market value for all
of MCK’s hotel properties (refer to Appendix 3 for details on the valuer, value methodology and key
assumptions).
Table 8: MCK Property Portfolio Market Valuation Summary (as of 31 December 2024)
Property/Location
# of Rooms /
Sqm
Property
Valuation
($m)
Value per
Room / Sqm
Valuation
reporting
date
MSocial Hotel Auckland 190 97,500 513 31-Dec-24
Copthorne Hotel Auckland City 106 10,750 101 31-Dec-24
Copthorne Hotel Bay of Islands (49% owned) 180 19,250 107 31-Dec-24
The Mayfair Hotel Christchurch
1
67 31,900 476 22-Jan-25
Kingsgate Hotel Dunedin 55 5,200 95 31-Jan-25
Copthorne Hotel Greymouth 53 11,000 208 31-Jan-25
Millennium Hotel New Plymouth Waterfront 42 11,250 268 31-Dec-24
Copthorne Hotel Palmerston North 76 10,200 134 31-Dec-24
Millennium Queenstown 220 100,000 455 11-Feb-25
Copthorne Hotel & Resort Queenstown Lakefront 240 82,000 342 11-Feb-25
Copthorne Hotel & Resort Queenstown Lakeview 85 21,940 258 31-Jan-25
Millennium Rotorua 228 66,000 289 11-Feb-25
Copthorne Hotel Rotorua 58
2
10,100 174 31-Dec-24
Kingsgate Hotel Te Anau 69 10,000 145 31-Jan-25
Copthorne Hotel Wellington Oriental Bay 118 22,750 193 31-Dec-24
Hotels 1,787 509,840 273
Hotels Surplus Land
3
35,106 34,483 1.0
Sofitel Brisbane JV (50%)
4
416 110,305 512
Sydney Apartments
5
2,181 22,894 10.5
Total Value of MCK Properties (Ex. CDI) 677,522
Sources: Property valuation reports from CVAS (NZ) Limited trading as Colliers and Bower Valuations Limited, unless noted
otherwise. MCK purchase price announcements.
1
The Mayfair Hotel Christchurch value based on the purchase price (transaction settled on 22 January 2025).
2
Although Copthorne Rotorua has 136 rooms available, only 58 are currently utilised.
3
Includes surplus land adjacent to Copthorne Hotel Queenstown Lakefront (value as of 31-Jan-25), to Copthorne Hotel Palmerston
North (value as of 31-Dec-24), to Copthorne Hotel Rotorua (value as of 31-Dec-24), to Kingsgate Hotel Te Anau (value as of 31-Jan-
25), and land purchased in Whangarei on 19-Aug-24 for the development of a hotel.
4
Sofitel Brisbane JV value based on book value of MCK’s share (including advances) as of 31 December 2024 (hotel acquired on 15
December 2023).
5
Sydney apartments value based on man ag ement’s es timat e of ne t re alisable value of AU$20.8m.
3.8.2. CDI Property Portfolio
A summary of CDI’s development and investment property portfolio is set out in Table 9. As at 31
December 2024, the market value of CDI’s properties totalled $422.8m (as reported by CDI),
comprising $357.8m of residential land and $65.1m of commercial investment property (as reported by
MCK).
Table 9: CDI Property Portfolio Market Valuation Summary (31 December 2024)
Property Location Size (ha)
Property
Valuation ($m)
Hobsonville & Trig Roads Whenuapai 13.8
Gordonton, Puketaha & Greenhill Roads Hamilton 132.5
Arataki Road Havelock North 11.2
Iona & Middle Roads Havelock North 70.1
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 24
Profile of MCK
Pelorus Sound Marlborough 11.8
Lucas Terrace Nelson 3.1
Highland Drive Richmond 10.8
Stonebrook - Lot 2 (Stage 27) Rolleston 0.04
Prestons Park Christchurch 91.1
Worsleys Road Christchurch 29.8
Wairakei Road / Stanleys Road Christchurch 10.1
Total Land Development Projects
384.3 357.8
Burnside Road / Diversey Lane Wiri, Auckland 3.9
Stonebrook Retail Centre Rolleston 0.3
Prestons Park Commercial Centre Christchurch 0.9
Investment Properties
5.0 65.1
Total Value of CDI Properties
422.8
Sources: MCK and CDI FY24 financial results.
CDI has historically reported assets at historical cost (less depreciation where relevant). The $357.8m
market value for CDI’s land development property compares to a 31 December 2024 carrying value of
$251.4m while the $65.1m for the investment property compares to a carrying value of $36.3m.
3.8.3. MCK Adjusted NAV
MCK’s reported net asset value per share attributable to MCK shareholders (“NAV”) as at 31 December
2024 was $3.46 based on the carrying values of MCK Group’s properties. However, this would be
much higher if the properties were valued at market value consistent with MCK’s accounting policy prior
to FY21. The market value of MCK Group’s properties is approximately $356m higher than the carrying
value. All else equal and without considering potential tax implications, this would translate to a NAV for
MCK Group of $5.71 per share (net of CDI minority interests) as summarised in Figure 17
5
.
Figure 17: Adjusted NAV for MCK Group at 31 December 2024
Source: FY24 financial results, Northington Partners assessment of adjusted NAV.
3.9. Outlook
Overall, the outlook for the New Zealand hotel sector remains positive, driven by increasing
international visitor numbers and the expected recovery in the domestic economy. These factors are
set to more than offset the recent and anticipated increases in hotel room capacity.
MCK’s future performance will be significantly influenced by the following:
- Ongoing recovery in international arrivals which are expected to reach pre-pandemic levels by
2027.
- The upcoming completion of the International Convention Centre in Auckland in 2026 is
expected to generate significant demand, particularly for business and convention-related travel.
5
Our assessment of adjusted NAV per share of $5.71 differs to the “Net Asset Backing Per Share on market value basis” of $5.39 reported in MCK’s FY24
financial results. This difference is mainly due to the fact that the Company allows for an increase in deferred tax liability on the property revaluations which
we have ignored as they would be unlikely to crystallise (due to capital gains being tax free in New Zealand if the properties are not held with the intention
of resale).
$2.25$5.71
$3.46
NAV 31 Dec 2024Property @ FMVAdjusted NAV
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 23
Profile of MCK
Although MCK no longer records the value of its hotels, developments and investment properties at fair
market value, these assets are periodically independently valued for impairment testing purposes.
These valuations are typically undertaken on a triennial rotating basis with all assets having been
revalued in the last three years. However, following the Offer from CDL, MCK’s valuers have provided
desktop valuation updates for all of the Group’s key property assets that were not valued as part of the
ordinary cycle ending on 31 December 2024. Table 8 summarises the most recent market value for all
of MCK’s hotel properties (refer to Appendix 3 for details on the valuer, value methodology and key
assumptions).
Table 8: MCK Property Portfolio Market Valuation Summary (as of 31 December 2024)
Property/Location
# of Rooms /
Sqm
Property
Valuation
($m)
Value per
Room / Sqm
Valuation
reporting
date
MSocial Hotel Auckland 190 97,500 513 31-Dec-24
Copthorne Hotel Auckland City 106 10,750 101 31-Dec-24
Copthorne Hotel Bay of Islands (49% owned) 180 19,250 107 31-Dec-24
The Mayfair Hotel Christchurch
1
67 31,900 476 22-Jan-25
Kingsgate Hotel Dunedin 55 5,200 95 31-Jan-25
Copthorne Hotel Greymouth 53 11,000 208 31-Jan-25
Millennium Hotel New Plymouth Waterfront 42 11,250 268 31-Dec-24
Copthorne Hotel Palmerston North 76 10,200 134 31-Dec-24
Millennium Queenstown 220 100,000 455 11-Feb-25
Copthorne Hotel & Resort Queenstown Lakefront 240 82,000 342 11-Feb-25
Copthorne Hotel & Resort Queenstown Lakeview 85 21,940 258 31-Jan-25
Millennium Rotorua 228 66,000 289 11-Feb-25
Copthorne Hotel Rotorua 58
2
10,100 174 31-Dec-24
Kingsgate Hotel Te Anau 69 10,000 145 31-Jan-25
Copthorne Hotel Wellington Oriental Bay 118 22,750 193 31-Dec-24
Hotels 1,787 509,840 273
Hotels Surplus Land
3
35,106 34,483 1.0
Sofitel Brisbane JV (50%)
4
416 110,305 512
Sydney Apartments
5
2,181 22,894 10.5
Total Value of MCK Properties (Ex. CDI) 677,522
Sources: Property valuation reports from CVAS (NZ) Limited trading as Colliers and Bower Valuations Limited, unless noted
otherwise. MCK purchase price announcements.
1
The Mayfair Hotel Christchurch value based on the purchase price (transaction settled on 22 January 2025).
2
Although Copthorne Rotorua has 136 rooms available, only 58 are currently utilised.
3
Includes surplus land adjacent to Copthorne Hotel Queenstown Lakefront (value as of 31-Jan-25), to Copthorne Hotel Palmerston
North (value as of 31-Dec-24), to Copthorne Hotel Rotorua (value as of 31-Dec-24), to Kingsgate Hotel Te Anau (value as of 31-Jan-
25), and land purchased in Whangarei on 19-Aug-24 for the development of a hotel.
4
Sofitel Brisbane JV value based on book value of MCK’s share (including advances) as of 31 December 2024 (hotel acquired on 15
December 2023).
5
Sydney apartments value based on man ag ement’s es timat e of ne t re alisable value of AU$20.8m.
3.8.2. CDI Property Portfolio
A summary of CDI’s development and investment property portfolio is set out in Table 9. As at 31
December 2024, the market value of CDI’s properties totalled $422.8m (as reported by CDI),
comprising $357.8m of residential land and $65.1m of commercial investment property (as reported by
MCK).
Table 9: CDI Property Portfolio Market Valuation Summary (31 December 2024)
Property Location Size (ha)
Property
Valuation ($m)
Hobsonville & Trig Roads Whenuapai 13.8
Gordonton, Puketaha & Greenhill Roads Hamilton 132.5
Arataki Road Havelock North 11.2
Iona & Middle Roads Havelock North 70.1
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 24
Profile of MCK
Pelorus Sound Marlborough 11.8
Lucas Terrace Nelson 3.1
Highland Drive Richmond 10.8
Stonebrook - Lot 2 (Stage 27) Rolleston 0.04
Prestons Park Christchurch 91.1
Worsleys Road Christchurch 29.8
Wairakei Road / Stanleys Road Christchurch 10.1
Total Land Development Projects
384.3 357.8
Burnside Road / Diversey Lane Wiri, Auckland 3.9
Stonebrook Retail Centre Rolleston 0.3
Prestons Park Commercial Centre Christchurch 0.9
Investment Properties
5.0 65.1
Total Value of CDI Properties
422.8
Sources: MCK and CDI FY24 financial results.
CDI has historically reported assets at historical cost (less depreciation where relevant). The $357.8m
market value for CDI’s land development property compares to a 31 December 2024 carrying value of
$251.4m while the $65.1m for the investment property compares to a carrying value of $36.3m.
3.8.3. MCK Adjusted NAV
MCK’s reported net asset value per share attributable to MCK shareholders (“NAV”) as at 31 December
2024 was $3.46 based on the carrying values of MCK Group’s properties. However, this would be
much higher if the properties were valued at market value consistent with MCK’s accounting policy prior
to FY21. The market value of MCK Group’s properties is approximately $356m higher than the carrying
value. All else equal and without considering potential tax implications, this would translate to a NAV for
MCK Group of $5.71 per share (net of CDI minority interests) as summarised in Figure 17
5
.
Figure 17: Adjusted NAV for MCK Group at 31 December 2024
Source: FY24 financial results, Northington Partners assessment of adjusted NAV.
3.9. Outlook
Overall, the outlook for the New Zealand hotel sector remains positive, driven by increasing
international visitor numbers and the expected recovery in the domestic economy. These factors are
set to more than offset the recent and anticipated increases in hotel room capacity.
MCK’s future performance will be significantly influenced by the following:
- Ongoing recovery in international arrivals which are expected to reach pre-pandemic levels by
2027.
- The upcoming completion of the International Convention Centre in Auckland in 2026 is
expected to generate significant demand, particularly for business and convention-related travel.
5
Our assessment of adjusted NAV per share of $5.71 differs to the “Net Asset Backing Per Share on market value basis” of $5.39 reported in MCK’s FY24
financial results. This difference is mainly due to the fact that the Company allows for an increase in deferred tax liability on the property revaluations which
we have ignored as they would be unlikely to crystallise (due to capital gains being tax free in New Zealand if the properties are not held with the intention
of resale).
$2.25$5.71
$3.46
NAV 31 Dec 2024Property @ FMVAdjusted NAV
APPENDIX: INDEPENDENT ADVISER’S REPORT
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 25
Profile of MCK
- The improvement in the domestic economy is also expected to add further demand for hotel
accommodation. As business confidence returns, there is likely to be increased demand from
the corporate sector, while an uplift in disposable income and consumer confidence will drive
more domestic tourism, especially for leisure and entertainment purposes.
Other key factors which are likely to affect the outlook for MCK include the following:
- The improving sector outlook is reflected in the number of hotels recently completed or planned.
Although increasing supply would be expected to suppress occupancy and ADRs, this effect has
not yet been observed in the data. In the short to medium-term, we expect demand to increase
faster than the sector can add new capacity.
- The labour shortages which had a material impact on hotel operations since Covid-19 have
largely been addressed. With a more stable workforce now in place, hotels have been able to
increase room availability and improve service delivery, helping to accommodate the growing
tourist numbers.
- Increasing demand supporting increased ADRs and RevPAR, particularly offsetting recent cost
pressures.
CDI’s outlook will be influenced by the following:
- CDI’s residential development business is inherently cyclical, with performance closely tied to
market conditions and broader economic trends. In a declining interest rate environment, we
expect the property market to show signs of improvement, supporting stronger demand.
- CDI holds a strong portfolio of highly prospective sites and recently completed developments
that position the business well to capitalise on improving market conditions. CDI is already
showing early signs of recovery with sales and earnings in FY24 representing a significant
improvement over FY23.
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 26
Valuation of MCK
4.0 Valuation of MCK
4.1. Valuation Methodology
Our valuation of MCK has been prepared on the basis of “fair value”. The generally accepted definition
of fair value (and that applied by us in forming our opinion) is the value agreed in a hypothetical
transaction between a knowledgeable, willing, but not anxious buyer and a knowledgeable, willing, but
not anxious seller, acting at arm’s length. Our assessment of equity value is based on a 100% control
position.
The most reliable evidence as to the value of a business or asset is the price at which the business or
closely comparable businesses have been bought and sold in an arm’s length transaction. In the
absence of direct market evidence, estimates of value are made using a range of methodologies. In
most cases, value is determined as a function of the estimated level of cash returns that the business is
expected to generate in the future. The specific approach that is used to estimate this value is
dependent on the nature of the business and the expectations regarding future performance.
The primary valuation methodologies commonly used for valuing businesses include:
- Multiple approach: This method determines value by applying a valuation multiple to the
assessed level of maintainable earnings or other value benchmark (e.g. book value per share)
where the multiple is chosen to reflect both the investment characteristics (growth, overhead
costs, etc) and the risk associated with the future performance of the business.
- Discounted Cash flows: A DCF approach is based on an explicit forecast of the annual cash
flows that will be generated over a specified forecast period. The value of cash flows expected
beyond the explicit forecast period is incorporated into the valuation process by capitalising an
estimate of maintainable cash flows for the terminal period.
-
Orderly realisation of assets: This method involves an estimate of the net proceeds which
would be available following the orderly liquidation of company assets and the resulting net
surplus available for distribution to shareholders.
Given the nature of MCK’s assets, we suggest that the most appropriate measure of fair value for MCK
involves a combination of valuation approaches. This in part reflects that MCK’s hotel business
earnings may still be adversely affected by the legacy impacts of Covid-19 (as discussed in Section 2.2)
and that a multiple approach may not fully reflect the underlying value for MCK’s hotel land and
buildings (which may also have higher alternate use value). Similarly, MCK’s residential development
activities (through CDI) generate lumpy cash flows depending on the prevailing stage and timeframe for
the development portfolio, and that means an earnings approach is inappropriate. The value of MCK
will also be influenced by the investment objectives of the controlling shareholder whose strategy may
differ to other minority shareholders and may not necessarily represent the value maximising strategy
for all shareholders in the short term. It could therefore be the case that winding-up the business will
deliver greater value in the short term compared to continuing to operate as a going concern.
Based on the unique characteristics of MCK’s hotel and property investments, we have assessed
MCK’s value on a component “sum-of-the-parts” basis both as a going concern (“Going Concern
Value”) and under an orderly realisation of assets through the sale of its hotel and residential and
investment properties (“Wind-up Value”).
The Going Concern Value utilises EBITDA multiples for the NZ Hotels business and recent market
valuations (as at 31 December 2024) for all other assets held through MCK and CDI. In contrast, the
Wind-up Value simply utilises market valuations for all Group assets (including the hotels owned by
MCK) with assumptions regarding the length of the sell-down period, the level of net income generated
over the sell-down period and the estimated costs that will be incurred to execute the sell-down.
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 25
Profile of MCK
- The improvement in the domestic economy is also expected to add further demand for hotel
accommodation. As business confidence returns, there is likely to be increased demand from
the corporate sector, while an uplift in disposable income and consumer confidence will drive
more domestic tourism, especially for leisure and entertainment purposes.
Other key factors which are likely to affect the outlook for MCK include the following:
- The improving sector outlook is reflected in the number of hotels recently completed or planned.
Although increasing supply would be expected to suppress occupancy and ADRs, this effect has
not yet been observed in the data. In the short to medium-term, we expect demand to increase
faster than the sector can add new capacity.
- The labour shortages which had a material impact on hotel operations since Covid-19 have
largely been addressed. With a more stable workforce now in place, hotels have been able to
increase room availability and improve service delivery, helping to accommodate the growing
tourist numbers.
- Increasing demand supporting increased ADRs and RevPAR, particularly offsetting recent cost
pressures.
CDI’s outlook will be influenced by the following:
- CDI’s residential development business is inherently cyclical, with performance closely tied to
market conditions and broader economic trends. In a declining interest rate environment, we
expect the property market to show signs of improvement, supporting stronger demand.
- CDI holds a strong portfolio of highly prospective sites and recently completed developments
that position the business well to capitalise on improving market conditions. CDI is already
showing early signs of recovery with sales and earnings in FY24 representing a significant
improvement over FY23.
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 26
Valuation of MCK
4.0 Valuation of MCK
4.1. Valuation Methodology
Our valuation of MCK has been prepared on the basis of “fair value”. The generally accepted definition
of fair value (and that applied by us in forming our opinion) is the value agreed in a hypothetical
transaction between a knowledgeable, willing, but not anxious buyer and a knowledgeable, willing, but
not anxious seller, acting at arm’s length. Our assessment of equity value is based on a 100% control
position.
The most reliable evidence as to the value of a business or asset is the price at which the business or
closely comparable businesses have been bought and sold in an arm’s length transaction. In the
absence of direct market evidence, estimates of value are made using a range of methodologies. In
most cases, value is determined as a function of the estimated level of cash returns that the business is
expected to generate in the future. The specific approach that is used to estimate this value is
dependent on the nature of the business and the expectations regarding future performance.
The primary valuation methodologies commonly used for valuing businesses include:
- Multiple approach: This method determines value by applying a valuation multiple to the
assessed level of maintainable earnings or other value benchmark (e.g. book value per share)
where the multiple is chosen to reflect both the investment characteristics (growth, overhead
costs, etc) and the risk associated with the future performance of the business.
- Discounted Cash flows: A DCF approach is based on an explicit forecast of the annual cash
flows that will be generated over a specified forecast period. The value of cash flows expected
beyond the explicit forecast period is incorporated into the valuation process by capitalising an
estimate of maintainable cash flows for the terminal period.
-
Orderly realisation of assets: This method involves an estimate of the net proceeds which
would be available following the orderly liquidation of company assets and the resulting net
surplus available for distribution to shareholders.
Given the nature of MCK’s assets, we suggest that the most appropriate measure of fair value for MCK
involves a combination of valuation approaches. This in part reflects that MCK’s hotel business
earnings may still be adversely affected by the legacy impacts of Covid-19 (as discussed in Section 2.2)
and that a multiple approach may not fully reflect the underlying value for MCK’s hotel land and
buildings (which may also have higher alternate use value). Similarly, MCK’s residential development
activities (through CDI) generate lumpy cash flows depending on the prevailing stage and timeframe for
the development portfolio, and that means an earnings approach is inappropriate. The value of MCK
will also be influenced by the investment objectives of the controlling shareholder whose strategy may
differ to other minority shareholders and may not necessarily represent the value maximising strategy
for all shareholders in the short term. It could therefore be the case that winding-up the business will
deliver greater value in the short term compared to continuing to operate as a going concern.
Based on the unique characteristics of MCK’s hotel and property investments, we have assessed
MCK’s value on a component “sum-of-the-parts” basis both as a going concern (“Going Concern
Value”) and under an orderly realisation of assets through the sale of its hotel and residential and
investment properties (“Wind-up Value”).
The Going Concern Value utilises EBITDA multiples for the NZ Hotels business and recent market
valuations (as at 31 December 2024) for all other assets held through MCK and CDI. In contrast, the
Wind-up Value simply utilises market valuations for all Group assets (including the hotels owned by
MCK) with assumptions regarding the length of the sell-down period, the level of net income generated
over the sell-down period and the estimated costs that will be incurred to execute the sell-down.
APPENDIX: INDEPENDENT ADVISER’S REPORT
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 27
Valuation of MCK
Table 10 summarises the value approach adopted for each of the asset categories owned by MCK.
Table 10: Summary of Valuation Methodologies for MCK
Group Company Value Component Valuation Approach
MCK
NZ Hotels - EBITDA multiple (Going Concern)
- Updated valuations of the hotel portfolio as at 31
December 2024 (Wind-up)
Sofitel Brisbane JV & Sydney
Apartments
- Book value for Sofitel Brisbane JV (acquired in
December 2023)
- Management’s e sti mate of net real isable val ue for
the Sydney Apartments
Overheads
- MCK allocation incorporated into EBITDA (Going
Concern)
- Net earnings over realisation period (Wind-up)
CDI
Residential Land Development - 31 December 2024 market valuation
Investment Properties - 31 December 2024 market valuation
Overheads - Multiple of CDI allocated overheads
4.2. Treatment of Redeemable Preference Shares
MCK’s RPS are a unique aspect of its capital structure that confer different rights to the holders
compared to those that apply to MCK’s ordinary shares. The key terms of the RPS as they relate to the
valuation of MCK are summarised in Table 11:
Table 11: MCK RPS Key Terms
RPS outstanding
52,739,543
Voting rights
Non-voting other than on matters relating to the RPS
Rights to
distribution
The RPS have equal rights to all distributions (including dividends) made by MCK
except for distributions made under a liquidation (see below)
Redemption The RPS have no maturity date but are redeemable at the Company’s election
subject to having first received the approval of RPS holders. RPS approval requires
a special resolution (75% or more of the votes cast on the resolution to redeem) and
may be voted on by CDL. Given CDL holds 91.3% of the RPS, it is in a position to
unilaterally approve any special resolution.
If the RPS are redeemed, the redemption amount per RPS is the higher of:
- The 20-day volume weighted average price for the RPS on NZX ($1.80 as at
13 February 2025); and
- $0.64, being the original issue price for the RPS
Liquidation
preference
On a liquidation of MCK (as contemplated for a hypothetical wind-up of the business
underlying our Wind-up Value), the RPS rank ahead of ordinary shareholders in
relation to any net surplus proceeds available for distribution.
On a return of surplus assets, the proceeds will be applied between RPS holders
and ordinary shareholders as follows:
- In first priority, up to $0.64 per RPS (being the original issue price for the RPS)
to RPS holders;
- Secondly, the balance will be allocated to ordinary shareholders on a pro rata
basis amongst ordinary shareholders up to $0.64 per ordinary share;
- Finally, in the event of a remaining surplus above this level, all RPS and
ordinary shareholders rank equally on the distribution of the remaining surplus.
In effect, this means that upon a liquidation of MCK, if the available surplus is above
approximately $101.2m (being the application of the above waterfall distribution to
ensure RPS holders and ordinary shareholders each receive at least $0.64 per
share), RPS and ordinary shareholders will then each receive the same value per
share. That is, total proceeds will be distributed equally across all 158,218,286
shares on issue (being the number of both RPS and ordinary shares).
We would expect the price performance of the RPS to mirror the MCK ordinary shares through time
because they have an equal right to any distributions, although the RPS should trade at a discount
because they have no voting influence on key decisions of MCK. The price history for both the ordinary
shares and the RPS are shown in Figure 18. Over the last 5 years, the price relativity of the RPS has
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 28
Valuation of MCK
fluctuated between a premium and discount to the ordinary shares with an average premium of ~4%.
While this is counterintuitive, we suggest this simply reflects the lack of liquidity in both securities rather
than reflecting the underlying value of the RPS relative to the ordinary shares.
Figure 18: MCK RPS Price Performance Relative to MCK
Source: IRESS
The assumed treatment of the RPS introduces an additional element to our valuation due to their
redemption rights and the likely outcome in the event of a managed liquidation. In this respect, we note
that CDL controls 91.3% of the RPS and can vote on key matters relating to the RPS, including any
possibility of redemption. CDL therefore effectively controls how the RPS will be manged in the future
and we assume that it would vote in a way that maximises the total value to CDL across its holding in
both the ordinary shares and RPS.
The Offer does not apply to the RPS because these are not considered equity securities for the
purposes of the Code. However, the Offer document states that independently of the Offer, CDL is
willing to acquire the RPS at $1.70 per share through its broker on the NZX Main Board. CDL has also
stated it may elect to seek to have the RPS redeemed, if CDL is successful in acquiring all of the
outstanding ordinary shares of MCK. Based on the redemption terms and recent RPS pricing, this
would imply a value of $1.80 per RPS (based on 20-day VWAP as at 13 February).
Unless the RPS consistently traded at a material premium to the ordinary shares (which is very unlikely
in anything other than distress scenarios), we believe there is no commercial incentive for CDL to have
the RPS redeemed. That is, considering its relative ownership of RPS and ordinary shares, the total
economic interest held by CDL in MCK will be maximised if the RPS are not redeemed.
We have therefore assumed for the purposes of both our Going Concern Value and Wind-up Value that
the number of MCK shares on issue is the fully diluted number including both the ordinary shares and
RPS. Considering the value range we have assessed for the Company (as set out below), we believe
that it is always in CDL’s best interest to ensure the RPS are treated in the same way as ordinary
shares (and not redeemed).
4.3. FY25 Earnings Projection
While we have not entirely relied on an earnings-based approach to support our valuation, the valuation
framework includes:
- a multiple based assessment for the NZ Hotels business (as a component of the Going
Concern Value);
- the value impact of certain corporate overheads (both for the Going Concern Value and Wind-
up Value); and
- estimated net income generated by the business over the assumed realisation period (as a
component of the Wind-up Value).
The projected earnings for the MCK business therefore remain important inputs to both our Going
Concern and Wind-up Values. MCK has provided detailed management projections for FY25 based on
key assumptions for each of the component businesses, including hotel occupancy, ADRs and RevPAR
$1.00
$1.25
$1.50
$1.75
$2.00
$2.25
$2.50
$2.75
MCK OrdsMCK RPS
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 27
Valuation of MCK
Table 10 summarises the value approach adopted for each of the asset categories owned by MCK.
Table 10: Summary of Valuation Methodologies for MCK
Group Company Value Component Valuation Approach
MCK
NZ Hotels - EBITDA multiple (Going Concern)
- Updated valuations of the hotel portfolio as at 31
December 2024 (Wind-up)
Sofitel Brisbane JV & Sydney
Apartments
- Book value for Sofitel Brisbane JV (acquired in
December 2023)
- Management’s e sti mate of net real isable val ue for
the Sydney Apartments
Overheads
- MCK allocation incorporated into EBITDA (Going
Concern)
- Net earnings over realisation period (Wind-up)
CDI
Residential Land Development - 31 December 2024 market valuation
Investment Properties - 31 December 2024 market valuation
Overheads - Multiple of CDI allocated overheads
4.2. Treatment of Redeemable Preference Shares
MCK’s RPS are a unique aspect of its capital structure that confer different rights to the holders
compared to those that apply to MCK’s ordinary shares. The key terms of the RPS as they relate to the
valuation of MCK are summarised in Table 11:
Table 11: MCK RPS Key Terms
RPS outstanding
52,739,543
Voting rights
Non-voting other than on matters relating to the RPS
Rights to
distribution
The RPS have equal rights to all distributions (including dividends) made by MCK
except for distributions made under a liquidation (see below)
Redemption The RPS have no maturity date but are redeemable at the Company’s election
subject to having first received the approval of RPS holders. RPS approval requires
a special resolution (75% or more of the votes cast on the resolution to redeem) and
may be voted on by CDL. Given CDL holds 91.3% of the RPS, it is in a position to
unilaterally approve any special resolution.
If the RPS are redeemed, the redemption amount per RPS is the higher of:
- The 20-day volume weighted average price for the RPS on NZX ($1.80 as at
13 February 2025); and
- $0.64, being the original issue price for the RPS
Liquidation
preference
On a liquidation of MCK (as contemplated for a hypothetical wind-up of the business
underlying our Wind-up Value), the RPS rank ahead of ordinary shareholders in
relation to any net surplus proceeds available for distribution.
On a return of surplus assets, the proceeds will be applied between RPS holders
and ordinary shareholders as follows:
- In first priority, up to $0.64 per RPS (being the original issue price for the RPS)
to RPS holders;
- Secondly, the balance will be allocated to ordinary shareholders on a pro rata
basis amongst ordinary shareholders up to $0.64 per ordinary share;
- Finally, in the event of a remaining surplus above this level, all RPS and
ordinary shareholders rank equally on the distribution of the remaining surplus.
In effect, this means that upon a liquidation of MCK, if the available surplus is above
approximately $101.2m (being the application of the above waterfall distribution to
ensure RPS holders and ordinary shareholders each receive at least $0.64 per
share), RPS and ordinary shareholders will then each receive the same value per
share. That is, total proceeds will be distributed equally across all 158,218,286
shares on issue (being the number of both RPS and ordinary shares).
We would expect the price performance of the RPS to mirror the MCK ordinary shares through time
because they have an equal right to any distributions, although the RPS should trade at a discount
because they have no voting influence on key decisions of MCK. The price history for both the ordinary
shares and the RPS are shown in Figure 18. Over the last 5 years, the price relativity of the RPS has
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 28
Valuation of MCK
fluctuated between a premium and discount to the ordinary shares with an average premium of ~4%.
While this is counterintuitive, we suggest this simply reflects the lack of liquidity in both securities rather
than reflecting the underlying value of the RPS relative to the ordinary shares.
Figure 18: MCK RPS Price Performance Relative to MCK
Source: IRESS
The assumed treatment of the RPS introduces an additional element to our valuation due to their
redemption rights and the likely outcome in the event of a managed liquidation. In this respect, we note
that CDL controls 91.3% of the RPS and can vote on key matters relating to the RPS, including any
possibility of redemption. CDL therefore effectively controls how the RPS will be manged in the future
and we assume that it would vote in a way that maximises the total value to CDL across its holding in
both the ordinary shares and RPS.
The Offer does not apply to the RPS because these are not considered equity securities for the
purposes of the Code. However, the Offer document states that independently of the Offer, CDL is
willing to acquire the RPS at $1.70 per share through its broker on the NZX Main Board. CDL has also
stated it may elect to seek to have the RPS redeemed, if CDL is successful in acquiring all of the
outstanding ordinary shares of MCK. Based on the redemption terms and recent RPS pricing, this
would imply a value of $1.80 per RPS (based on 20-day VWAP as at 13 February).
Unless the RPS consistently traded at a material premium to the ordinary shares (which is very unlikely
in anything other than distress scenarios), we believe there is no commercial incentive for CDL to have
the RPS redeemed. That is, considering its relative ownership of RPS and ordinary shares, the total
economic interest held by CDL in MCK will be maximised if the RPS are not redeemed.
We have therefore assumed for the purposes of both our Going Concern Value and Wind-up Value that
the number of MCK shares on issue is the fully diluted number including both the ordinary shares and
RPS. Considering the value range we have assessed for the Company (as set out below), we believe
that it is always in CDL’s best interest to ensure the RPS are treated in the same way as ordinary
shares (and not redeemed).
4.3. FY25 Earnings Projection
While we have not entirely relied on an earnings-based approach to support our valuation, the valuation
framework includes:
- a multiple based assessment for the NZ Hotels business (as a component of the Going
Concern Value);
- the value impact of certain corporate overheads (both for the Going Concern Value and Wind-
up Value); and
- estimated net income generated by the business over the assumed realisation period (as a
component of the Wind-up Value).
The projected earnings for the MCK business therefore remain important inputs to both our Going
Concern and Wind-up Values. MCK has provided detailed management projections for FY25 based on
key assumptions for each of the component businesses, including hotel occupancy, ADRs and RevPAR
$1.00
$1.25
$1.50
$1.75
$2.00
$2.25
$2.50
$2.75
MCK OrdsMCK RPS
APPENDIX: INDEPENDENT ADVISER’S REPORT
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 29
Valuation of MCK
for the NZ Hotels and Sofitel Brisbane JV, and gross development realisations, costs and timing for the
residential developments. Table 12 provides a summary of the FY25 budget for NZ Hotels and the total
MCK business as well as a comparison to FY24 actual results.
Table 12: MCK FY25 Projections vs FY24 Actuals
Segment
FY24
Actual ($m)
FY25
Budget ($m)
Key Budget Assumptions
NZ Hotels $109.5 $134.4 - Overall occupancy rate increases from 67%
to 74%; ADR increases by 3.4%; Additional
contribution from Mayfair Christchurch
Sydney Apartments
$17.6 - Rental income and sale of 12 units
CDI
$49.1 - Property sales and rental income
Total Revenue
$176.2 $202.2
Hotels $17.4 $23.9 - Increase margin resulting from improved
performance and scale
Sydney Apartments $8.8 - Margin on apartment unit sales
CDI $25.0 - CDI property sales mix
Total EBITDA
$51.1 $48.5
Source: MCK FY24 draft annual report; MCK management projections for FY25.
We have tested the reasonableness of the FY25 budget relative to the key input assumptions,
particularly those relating to the NZ Hotels and do not believe any adjustments are required. To support
the Wind-Up Scenario, we have extrapolated the FY25 MCK Group budget out for a further two years to
incorporate our assessment of income from the hotel and property portfolio over the assumed
realisation period (2-3 years). The key Wind-up Value assumptions are detailed in Section 4.5.
4.4. Going Concern Value
4.4.1. NZ Hotels
In determining the Going Concern Value for the NZ Hotels, we have reviewed enterprise value (“EV”) to
EBITDA multiples for available market evidence of comparable companies and transactions. This
benchmarking exercise considers the particular characteristics of the comparable entities or
transactions, including the nature of the assets and form of management (asset heavy property
ownership vs asset light hotel management / franchise / lease). Some of the evidence also includes the
implied multiples MCK has recently paid for its own individual acquisitions including Mayfair
Christchurch and Sofitel Brisbane.
We have elected EBITDA multiples (based on IFRS16 reporting) to assess the Going Concern Value of
the NZ Hotels due to the following key considerations:
− EBITDA is a frequently use valuation metric to assess the value of a company and is not
affected by differences in earnings caused by varying capital structures and depreciation and
amortisation policies;
− It is a commonly used measure by companies in the hotel management industry (including
MCK) to assess performance and the values of property acquisitions; and
− EBITDA is the most frequently available multiple for available hotel sector transaction evidence.
Table 13 summarises the implied EV/forecast EBITDA multiples for comparable listed hotel operators
(asset light and asset heavy) while Table 14 summarises multiples for available transaction evidence.
Appendix 4 provides more details of the companies and transactions used.
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 30
Valuation of MCK
Table 13: EBITDA Multiples of Comparable Trading Companies
EV/EBITDA Multiple
LTM NTM
Asset-light hotel operators
Average 20.2 x 16.1 x
Median 21.5 x 15.8 x
Asset-heavy hotel operators
Average 14.8 x 12.7 x
Median 13.8 x 12.8 x
Source: S&P Capital IQ (10 February 2025)
Table 14: EBITDA Multiples of Comparable Transactions
Target Acquirer Location Date
Implied EV
/ LTM
EBITDA
Implied EV
/ NTM
EBITDA
Millennium & Copthorne Related Transactions
Mayfair Christchurch MCK New Zealand Oct 2024 n/a 15.0 x
Sofitel Brisbane MCK & City
Developments Ltd
Australia Dec 2023 n/a 17.9 x
Millennium & Copthorne
Hotels plc (35% share)
City Developments Ltd United
Kingdom
Jun 2019 16.5 x 16.2 x
Average
16.5 x 16.4 x
Median
16.5 x 16.2 x
Other Transactions
Average 14.4 x 12.6 x
Median 13.5 x
11.6 x
Average (Overall) 14.5 x
14.0 x
Median (Overall) 13.5 x
14.2 x
Source: S&P Capital IQ (10 February 2025) MCK, and Northington Partners’ estimates.
Based on the available comparable company and transaction evidence, we note the following:
− The implied trading multiples are based on share market prices for small parcels of shares and
therefore do not include a premium that would otherwise be observed in the context of an offer
that results in a controlling shareholding (i.e . the CDL Offer). Consequently, we would expect a
premium to the comparable company multiples in a change of control situation. Control
premiums are typically in a range between 20% and 40% but this depends on a variety of
company specific factors.
− When comparing MCK to the comparable companies for valuation benchmarking, we place
more emphasis on the hotel operators who also own the majority of their investment properties
(as opposed to hotel operators who predominantly franchise, manage or lease their hotels).
− In the absence of New Zealand hotel portfolio sale transactions, MCK’s own purchase of
Mayfair Christchurch in late 2024 and Sofitel Brisbane in 2023 provide useful evidence. We
understand the purchase prices were consistent with the valuations at the time of acquisition
and implied EBITDA multiples of 15.0x and 17.9x respectively.
Based on the comparable company and transaction evidence, we believe that an appropriate multiple
for MCK’s Hotels business is between 14x and 16x. This is consistent with comparable company
multiples for hotel operators when allowing for an appropriate control premium and key transaction
evidence. As noted above, the most direct evidence relates to MCK’s purchase of Mayfair Christchurch
(15.0x) and Sofitel Brisbane (17.9x) as well as CDL’s acquisition of Millenium Copthorne Plc, the former
UK listed hotel group similar to MCK (16.2x). Our selected multiple range for the full business is
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 29
Valuation of MCK
for the NZ Hotels and Sofitel Brisbane JV, and gross development realisations, costs and timing for the
residential developments. Table 12 provides a summary of the FY25 budget for NZ Hotels and the total
MCK business as well as a comparison to FY24 actual results.
Table 12: MCK FY25 Projections vs FY24 Actuals
Segment
FY24
Actual ($m)
FY25
Budget ($m)
Key Budget Assumptions
NZ Hotels $109.5 $134.4 - Overall occupancy rate increases from 67%
to 74%; ADR increases by 3.4%; Additional
contribution from Mayfair Christchurch
Sydney Apartments
$17.6 - Rental income and sale of 12 units
CDI
$49.1 - Property sales and rental income
Total Revenue
$176.2 $202.2
Hotels $17.4 $23.9 - Increase margin resulting from improved
performance and scale
Sydney Apartments $8.8 - Margin on apartment unit sales
CDI $25.0 - CDI property sales mix
Total EBITDA
$51.1 $48.5
Source: MCK FY24 draft annual report; MCK management projections for FY25.
We have tested the reasonableness of the FY25 budget relative to the key input assumptions,
particularly those relating to the NZ Hotels and do not believe any adjustments are required. To support
the Wind-Up Scenario, we have extrapolated the FY25 MCK Group budget out for a further two years to
incorporate our assessment of income from the hotel and property portfolio over the assumed
realisation period (2-3 years). The key Wind-up Value assumptions are detailed in Section 4.5.
4.4. Going Concern Value
4.4.1. NZ Hotels
In determining the Going Concern Value for the NZ Hotels, we have reviewed enterprise value (“EV”) to
EBITDA multiples for available market evidence of comparable companies and transactions. This
benchmarking exercise considers the particular characteristics of the comparable entities or
transactions, including the nature of the assets and form of management (asset heavy property
ownership vs asset light hotel management / franchise / lease). Some of the evidence also includes the
implied multiples MCK has recently paid for its own individual acquisitions including Mayfair
Christchurch and Sofitel Brisbane.
We have elected EBITDA multiples (based on IFRS16 reporting) to assess the Going Concern Value of
the NZ Hotels due to the following key considerations:
− EBITDA is a frequently use valuation metric to assess the value of a company and is not
affected by differences in earnings caused by varying capital structures and depreciation and
amortisation policies;
− It is a commonly used measure by companies in the hotel management industry (including
MCK) to assess performance and the values of property acquisitions; and
− EBITDA is the most frequently available multiple for available hotel sector transaction evidence.
Table 13 summarises the implied EV/forecast EBITDA multiples for comparable listed hotel operators
(asset light and asset heavy) while Table 14 summarises multiples for available transaction evidence.
Appendix 4 provides more details of the companies and transactions used.
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 30
Valuation of MCK
Table 13: EBITDA Multiples of Comparable Trading Companies
EV/EBITDA Multiple
LTM NTM
Asset-light hotel operators
Average 20.2 x 16.1 x
Median 21.5 x 15.8 x
Asset-heavy hotel operators
Average 14.8 x 12.7 x
Median 13.8 x 12.8 x
Source: S&P Capital IQ (10 February 2025)
Table 14: EBITDA Multiples of Comparable Transactions
Target Acquirer Location Date
Implied EV
/ LTM
EBITDA
Implied EV
/ NTM
EBITDA
Millennium & Copthorne Related Transactions
Mayfair Christchurch MCK New Zealand Oct 2024 n/a 15.0 x
Sofitel Brisbane MCK & City
Developments Ltd
Australia Dec 2023 n/a 17.9 x
Millennium & Copthorne
Hotels plc (35% share)
City Developments Ltd United
Kingdom
Jun 2019 16.5 x 16.2 x
Average
16.5 x 16.4 x
Median
16.5 x 16.2 x
Other Transactions
Average 14.4 x 12.6 x
Median 13.5 x
11.6 x
Average (Overall) 14.5 x
14.0 x
Median (Overall) 13.5 x 14.2 x
Source: S&P Capital IQ (10 February 2025) MCK, and Northington Partners’ estimates.
Based on the available comparable company and transaction evidence, we note the following:
− The implied trading multiples are based on share market prices for small parcels of shares and
therefore do not include a premium that would otherwise be observed in the context of an offer
that results in a controlling shareholding (i.e . the CDL Offer). Consequently, we would expect a
premium to the comparable company multiples in a change of control situation. Control
premiums are typically in a range between 20% and 40% but this depends on a variety of
company specific factors.
− When comparing MCK to the comparable companies for valuation benchmarking, we place
more emphasis on the hotel operators who also own the majority of their investment properties
(as opposed to hotel operators who predominantly franchise, manage or lease their hotels).
− In the absence of New Zealand hotel portfolio sale transactions, MCK’s own purchase of
Mayfair Christchurch in late 2024 and Sofitel Brisbane in 2023 provide useful evidence. We
understand the purchase prices were consistent with the valuations at the time of acquisition
and implied EBITDA multiples of 15.0x and 17.9x respectively.
Based on the comparable company and transaction evidence, we believe that an appropriate multiple
for MCK’s Hotels business is between 14x and 16x. This is consistent with comparable company
multiples for hotel operators when allowing for an appropriate control premium and key transaction
evidence. As noted above, the most direct evidence relates to MCK’s purchase of Mayfair Christchurch
(15.0x) and Sofitel Brisbane (17.9x) as well as CDL’s acquisition of Millenium Copthorne Plc, the former
UK listed hotel group similar to MCK (16.2x). Our selected multiple range for the full business is
APPENDIX: INDEPENDENT ADVISER’S REPORT
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 31
Valuation of MCK
modestly lower than the average for these transactions to account for the varying quality of hotels
contained in the NZ Hotels portfolio.
Applying this multiple range to MCK’s FY25 budget EBITDA for the NZ Hotels segment of $32.7m (prior
to any allowance for corporate overheads) results in a value range of $458.1m - $523.5m. While this
value range is consistent with the current market valuations for the same hotel properties ($509.8m
excluding Sofitel Brisbane JV), it excludes the ongoing management overhead of administering and
managing the hotel portfolio. A total of ~$7.7m of corporate overheads has been allocated to NZ Hotels
within the MCK Group.
Our assessed value for the NZ Hotels portfolio is summarised in Table 15 below. After allowing for
overhead costs, our estimate of the Going Concern Value for NZ Hotels is in a range between $350.9m
and $401.1m.
Table 15: Going Concern Value for NZ Hotels
Low ($m) High ($m)
NZ Hotels FY25 EBITDA (pre Overheads) $32.7 $32.7
Allowance for NZ Hotels Corporate Overheads ($7.7) ($7.7)
NZ Hotels net EBITDA $25.1 $25.1
EBITDA Multiple 14.0x 16.0x
Enterprise Value $350.9 $401.1
4.4.2. Sofitel Brisbane JV, Surplus Land & Sydney Apartments
The adopted Going Concern Value for MCK Group’s NZ Hotels excludes certain MCK assets that do
not contribute to EBITDA, including:
− MCK’s 50% investment in Sofitel Brisbane. This is treated as an equity investment for
accounting purposes and its earnings contribution is not included in the FY25 budget EBITDA.
However, given this investment was acquired relatively recently (December 2023) and our
understanding that performance is meeting expectations, we suggest the value of MCK’s 50%
investment at the time of acquisition provides a suitable proxy for its current market value.
Based on the carrying value (including the purchase value and accumulated profits), we have
valued MCK’s 50% investment at $110.3m as of 31 December 2024.
− MCK’s surplus land at Queenstown, Te Anau, Palmerston North, Rotorua and Whangarei.
These land parcels provide scope for future hotel developments or could be sold as surplus
assets. We have added the 31 December 2024 market valuation of $34.5m for the surplus land
to our Going Concern Value with an allowance for +/-5% to account for uncertainty and risk
inherent in the valuation.
In addition, we have added the value of the 22 Sydney apartments owned by MCK. As these units are
expected to be sold within one year, we have adopted management’s est imate of the net realisable
value of $22.9m (with a +/-5% value range allowance).
4.4.3. CDI
As outlined in Section 4.1, we have valued CDI using the current market valuations for the residential
development and investment properties (detailed in Section 3.8.2) less an allowance for the impact of
overheads. This approach reflects that:
− CDI is predominantly involved in land development and section sales which can generate
significant lumpy and inconsistent cash flows depending on development and section sale
timing. The notion of “maintainable earnings” is therefore not applicable;
− The current market valuations for the residential land are largely based on directly comparable
sales evidence in the locations in which CDI operates, or the expected cash flows (both
development outflows and sales inflows and tax) from the property developments. We therefore
suggest that the valuations provide a reasonable estimate for the market value for CDI’s
development properties; and
− Similarly, the values independently assessed for the investment properties directly reflect the
estimated market value for these assets.
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 32
Valuation of MCK
The aggregated market valuations for the CDI assets make no allowance for the costs of managing and
administering the portfolio. We estimate these costs at $6.0m for FY25 (based on FY24 overheads and
allowing for significant increases in council rates and increased development/sales activity). The total
cost has been valued using a multiple of 9.0x, with the chosen multiple reflecting our assessment of the
expected timeframe for completing the existing portfolio of developments.
Our valuation assessment for CDI is summarised in Table 16. We note:
− In order to capture the potential uncertainty and risk in the valuations for the underlying assets,
we have applied a notional value range of +/- 5%;
− We have included CDI’s net cash position as of 31 December 2024 of $33.2m; and
− The value of CDI attributed to MCK is pro-rated in line with MCK’s shareholding in CDI
(65.31%).
We estimate that the value of CDI attributable to MCK ranges between $248.6m and $276.2m, with a
mid-point of $262.4m.
Table 16: CDI Value Attributable to MCK
Sources: MCK FY24 financial results; CDI FY24 financial results; Northington Partners assessment.
We note that our mid-point CDI valuation of $1.38 per share compares to a current traded price for CDI
shares of $0.79 (as of 20 February 2025), representing a premium of 75%. However, for the same
reasons we discuss in Section 3.6 in relation to the traded value for MCK shares, we do not believe that
the traded value of CDI shares is a reliable measure of underlying value of the business (on a 100%
control basis). We suggest that the traded price for CDI shares simply reflects the very low level of
liquidity and a discount for a minority position.
4.4.4. Going Concern Value Summary
Based on the component values for MCK and CDI, our Going Concern Value for MCK Group is in a
range between $4.36 and $4.89 per share, with a mid-point of $4.62. Our valuation assessment is
summarised in Table 17.
Table 17: Going Concern Value Summary
6
EV of NZ Hotels less non-controlling interests in Copthorne Bay of Islands and Copthorne Queenstown Lakeview (totalling $22.4m based on the market
valuations for the subject properties).
Low ( $m) High ($m)
Mid-Point
($m)
Residential Land Development $339.9 $375.6 $357.8
Investment Property $61.8 $68.3 $65.1
CDI Overheads ($54.3) ($54.3) ($54.3)
Total CDI Enterprise Value $347.4 $389.7 $368.6
Plus Net Cash $33.2 $33.2 $33.2
Total CDI Equity Value $380.7 $422.9 $401.8
CDI Value per Share ($) $1.30 $1.45 $1.38
Less 34.69% Minority Interests ($132.0) ($146.7) ($139.4)
MCK Share of CDI Equity Value (65.31%) $248.6 $276.2 $262.4
MCK Group Going Concern Value ($m) Low High Mid
NZ Hotels (net of hotel NCI)
6
$328.5 $378.6 $353.6
Sofitel Brisbane JV $110.3 $110.3 $110.3
Hotel Surplus Land (-5% / +5%) $32.8 $36.2 $34.5
Sydney Apartments (-5% / +5%) $21.7 $24.0 $22.9
65.3% of CDI $248.6 $276.2 $262.4
Total MCK EV (Ex. CDI Minorities) $741.9 $825.4 $783.7
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 31
Valuation of MCK
modestly lower than the average for these transactions to account for the varying quality of hotels
contained in the NZ Hotels portfolio.
Applying this multiple range to MCK’s FY25 budget EBITDA for the NZ Hotels segment of $32.7m (prior
to any allowance for corporate overheads) results in a value range of $458.1m - $523.5m. While this
value range is consistent with the current market valuations for the same hotel properties ($509.8m
excluding Sofitel Brisbane JV), it excludes the ongoing management overhead of administering and
managing the hotel portfolio. A total of ~$7.7m of corporate overheads has been allocated to NZ Hotels
within the MCK Group.
Our assessed value for the NZ Hotels portfolio is summarised in Table 15 below. After allowing for
overhead costs, our estimate of the Going Concern Value for NZ Hotels is in a range between $350.9m
and $401.1m.
Table 15: Going Concern Value for NZ Hotels
Low ($m) High ($m)
NZ Hotels FY25 EBITDA (pre Overheads) $32.7 $32.7
Allowance for NZ Hotels Corporate Overheads ($7.7) ($7.7)
NZ Hotels net EBITDA $25.1 $25.1
EBITDA Multiple 14.0x 16.0x
Enterprise Value $350.9 $401.1
4.4.2. Sofitel Brisbane JV, Surplus Land & Sydney Apartments
The adopted Going Concern Value for MCK Group’s NZ Hotels excludes certain MCK assets that do
not contribute to EBITDA, including:
− MCK’s 50% investment in Sofitel Brisbane. This is treated as an equity investment for
accounting purposes and its earnings contribution is not included in the FY25 budget EBITDA.
However, given this investment was acquired relatively recently (December 2023) and our
understanding that performance is meeting expectations, we suggest the value of MCK’s 50%
investment at the time of acquisition provides a suitable proxy for its current market value.
Based on the carrying value (including the purchase value and accumulated profits), we have
valued MCK’s 50% investment at $110.3m as of 31 December 2024.
− MCK’s surplus land at Queenstown, Te Anau, Palmerston North, Rotorua and Whangarei.
These land parcels provide scope for future hotel developments or could be sold as surplus
assets. We have added the 31 December 2024 market valuation of $34.5m for the surplus land
to our Going Concern Value with an allowance for +/-5% to account for uncertainty and risk
inherent in the valuation.
In addition, we have added the value of the 22 Sydney apartments owned by MCK. As these units are
expected to be sold within one year, we have adopted management’s est imate of the net realisable
value of $22.9m (with a +/-5% value range allowance).
4.4.3. CDI
As outlined in Section 4.1, we have valued CDI using the current market valuations for the residential
development and investment properties (detailed in Section 3.8.2) less an allowance for the impact of
overheads. This approach reflects that:
− CDI is predominantly involved in land development and section sales which can generate
significant lumpy and inconsistent cash flows depending on development and section sale
timing. The notion of “maintainable earnings” is therefore not applicable;
− The current market valuations for the residential land are largely based on directly comparable
sales evidence in the locations in which CDI operates, or the expected cash flows (both
development outflows and sales inflows and tax) from the property developments. We therefore
suggest that the valuations provide a reasonable estimate for the market value for CDI’s
development properties; and
− Similarly, the values independently assessed for the investment properties directly reflect the
estimated market value for these assets.
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 32
Valuation of MCK
The aggregated market valuations for the CDI assets make no allowance for the costs of managing and
administering the portfolio. We estimate these costs at $6.0m for FY25 (based on FY24 overheads and
allowing for significant increases in council rates and increased development/sales activity). The total
cost has been valued using a multiple of 9.0x, with the chosen multiple reflecting our assessment of the
expected timeframe for completing the existing portfolio of developments.
Our valuation assessment for CDI is summarised in Table 16. We note:
− In order to capture the potential uncertainty and risk in the valuations for the underlying assets,
we have applied a notional value range of +/- 5%;
− We have included CDI’s net cash position as of 31 December 2024 of $33.2m; and
− The value of CDI attributed to MCK is pro-rated in line with MCK’s shareholding in CDI
(65.31%).
We estimate that the value of CDI attributable to MCK ranges between $248.6m and $276.2m, with a
mid-point of $262.4m.
Table 16: CDI Value Attributable to MCK
Sources: MCK FY24 financial results; CDI FY24 financial results; Northington Partners assessment.
We note that our mid-point CDI valuation of $1.38 per share compares to a current traded price for CDI
shares of $0.79 (as of 20 February 2025), representing a premium of 75%. However, for the same
reasons we discuss in Section 3.6 in relation to the traded value for MCK shares, we do not believe that
the traded value of CDI shares is a reliable measure of underlying value of the business (on a 100%
control basis). We suggest that the traded price for CDI shares simply reflects the very low level of
liquidity and a discount for a minority position.
4.4.4. Going Concern Value Summary
Based on the component values for MCK and CDI, our Going Concern Value for MCK Group is in a
range between $4.36 and $4.89 per share, with a mid-point of $4.62. Our valuation assessment is
summarised in Table 17.
Table 17: Going Concern Value Summary
6
EV of NZ Hotels less non-controlling interests in Copthorne Bay of Islands and Copthorne Queenstown Lakeview (totalling $22.4m based on the market
valuations for the subject properties).
Low ( $m) High ($m)
Mid-Point
($m)
Residential Land Development $339.9 $375.6 $357.8
Investment Property $61.8 $68.3 $65.1
CDI Overheads ($54.3) ($54.3) ($54.3)
Total CDI Enterprise Value $347.4 $389.7 $368.6
Plus Net Cash $33.2 $33.2 $33.2
Total CDI Equity Value $380.7 $422.9 $401.8
CDI Value per Share ($) $1.30 $1.45 $1.38
Less 34.69% Minority Interests ($132.0) ($146.7) ($139.4)
MCK Share of CDI Equity Value (65.31%) $248.6 $276.2 $262.4
MCK Group Going Concern Value ($m) Low High Mid
NZ Hotels (net of hotel NCI)
6
$328.5 $378.6 $353.6
Sofitel Brisbane JV $110.3 $110.3 $110.3
Hotel Surplus Land (-5% / +5%) $32.8 $36.2 $34.5
Sydney Apartments (-5% / +5%) $21.7 $24.0 $22.9
65.3% of CDI $248.6 $276.2 $262.4
Total MCK EV (Ex. CDI Minorities) $741.9 $825.4 $783.7
APPENDIX: INDEPENDENT ADVISER’S REPORT
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 33
Valuation of MCK
Source: Northington Partners.
4.5. Wind-up Value
While MCK’s strategy is to operate its hotels, develop its residential land holdings and continue to hold
its investment properties, we believe that the assets could be readily sold on a hypothetical wind-up
scenario. We have therefore also assessed the potential Wind-up Value of MCK on the basis of an
orderly sale of its component assets.
We note that liquidation would require a special resolution of shareholders and CDL therefore controls
any decision to liquidate MCK via its majority shareholding (and CDI through MCK’s majority ownership
interest in that business). While we understand CDL has no intention of changing its current strategy,
we suggest that the Wind-up Value provides a useful counterfactual valuation benchmark to our Going
Concern Value.
Table 18 below summarises the key assumptions used in evaluating the Wind-up Value.
Table 18: Wind-up Value Assumptions
Category Assumptions
Liquidation period - Given the size and unique nature of MCK’s asset portfolio, we consider it unlikely
that the assets could be readily sold to one purchaser and would need to be sold in
multiple parcels. Even the hotel portfolio would likely necessitate a break-up to
reflect the differing quality and locations of the portfolio.
- Given the number and diversity of the assets owned by MCK, we assume that an
orderly realisation of assets would take 2 – 3 years to complete before the final
proceeds could be distributed to shareholders. This timeframe also reflects the
time required to appoint a liquidator and finalise the liquidation process in line with
New Zealand legal requirements.
NZ Hotels, Sofitel
Brisbane JV and
Surplus Land
- The hotel portfolio contains properties with varying quality and locations and we
believe that some of the hotel assets are likely to attract more buyer interest than
others (e.g. MSocial Auckland vs Copthorne Greymouth). We have therefore
assumed that the portfolio is sold down in tranches. Rather than determining the
order of potential sales on an asset-by-asset basis, we have simply assumed the
portfolio is realised as follows: 40% after 1 year, 30% at the end of year 2 and 30%
at the end of year 3.
- The uncertainty over the sell-down timing is partly accounted for in our assumed
sale values. The mid-point values are based on the 31 December 2024 valuations
but with an allowance for 5% value upside and 5% downside.
- All asset sales are assumed to incur total disposal costs of 2%.
Sydney
Apartments
- We have assumed the sales of the remaining Sydney apartments, commercial
units and carparks are completed within one year, consistent with management’s
es ti mates.
Lease liabilities
and deferred tax
liability
- The majority of the on-going lease liabilities for MCK is related to ground leases
that are in place for a small number of hotels. As the property valuers have either
considered the ground lease payments in the forecast cash flows or excluded their
associated revenue (e.g. carparking revenue in M Social Auckland) when
assessing current market value, we have not made an explicit allowance for the
lease liability in the Wind-up Value scenario.
- We have however assumed that the deferred tax liability arising from depreciation
recovery would crystallize under a wind-up scenario and have made an allowance
for that cost in our estimate of the net liquidation proceeds.
7
Adjusted Net Debt includes lease liabilities mainly related to ground rent (in Copthorne Auckland and Copthorne Greymouth hotels) and carpark leases
(in M Social Auckland and Millennium Rotorua) because these costs are not included in the IFRS16 reported EBITDA. It also includes the incremental new
debt facilities ($30m) utilised to purchase the Christchurch Mayfair hotel post 31 December 2024.
Less Adjusted Net Debt
7
($52.4) ($52.4) ($52.4)
MCK Total Equity Value $689.6 $773.1 $731.3
Fully Diluted Shares on Issue
158,218,286 158,218,286 158,218,286
Value per share ($) $4.36 $4.89 $4.62
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 34
Valuation of MCK
CDI - CDI is assumed to be wound up and liquidated at the same time as MCK with
minority shareholders receiving their proceeds at the end of the realisation period.
- We have assumed CDI’s investment property portfolio is sold at the end of the
liquidation period (2 or 3 years) reflecting our view that these assets are relatively
liquid and will generate stable income over the realisation period. They are
assumed to generate sufficient returns over the liquidation period such that the
eventual sale value will deliver an amount equal to the 31 December 2024 market
value in present value terms. That is, we assume these assets will generate
income and capital appreciation in line with their cost of capital).
- Given the nature of CDI’s residential development activities and the need to
continue development in order to support asset values, we assume that CDI
continues to actively develop and market sections over the realisation period.
Similar to the investment property portfolio, we assume that the cash flows from
ongoing development and section sales generates sufficient returns to justify the
current market valuation of these properties (as of 31 December 2024) in present
value terms.
- To account for the sell-down uncertainty, we have assumed the sale values (in
present value terms) range between 5% below and 5% above their 31 December
2024 market valuations.
Interim Capital
Return
- In order to maximise value from the sell-down, we assume that an interim capital
return is made at the end of year 1 of approximately $130m.
- We have assumed this is achieved through a pro rata share buyback. Given
MCK’s available subscribed capital (and available imputation credits), we assume
that the capital return is non-taxable to shareholders.
Wind-up Costs - We estimate redundancy costs of $7.1 million (based on corporate overhead
salary costs for 6 months) plus $1.0 million for other liquidation related costs (legal,
tax and other wind-up costs).
Net operating cash
flow during
realisation period
- We have assumed that the business would generate annual net cash flows
consistent with MCK’s FY25 budget for the remainder of FY25. We have forecast
FY26 and FY27 operational cash flows consistent with FY25 but reflecting
expected ongoing increases in occupancy rates (to pre-Covid levels by FY27) and
a 3% annual increase in the overall ADR.
- Rental income from CDI’s investment property portfolio and corporate overhead
costs are assumed to be in line with the FY25 budget, with a 3% annual increase
assumed for the remainder the wind-up period.
- Annual capex assumed for FY25-FY27 ($15.9m in FY25, $7.8m in FY26 and
$3.9m in FY27) based on MCK’s capex budget. We have not considered any
additional capex required for other major projects during the wind-up period as the
majority of this capex has been factored in the property market valuations.
- For simplicity, the net cash flows resulting from the on-going business is estimated
to reduce proportionally in line with assumed asset realisations.
- We have allowed for interest income (at 4 %) on the cash proceeds generated from
the orderly realisation of assets.
Present value
calculation
- We estimate the present value of the realisation proceeds from the 2-3 year sell-
down period by discounting the projected cashflows at a nominal, post-tax discount
rate of 10%.
- This rate represents our assessment of the appropriate risk-adjusted return for
MCK’s portfolio which comprises assets with a variety of risk profiles (i .e. higher
risk residential property development vs relatively lower risk investment properties
and hotels).
Source: Northington Partners.
The values of each component of the Wind-up Value are summarised in Table 19 below. In present
value terms, we estimate a total value range between $704.8m and $814.1m. Assuming that the RPS
are not redeemed and will therefore participate in the net proceeds on the same basis as the ordinary
shares (see Section 4.2 above), our valuation equates to $4.45 and $5.15 per share, with a mid-point of
$4.80.
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 33
Valuation of MCK
Source: Northington Partners.
4.5. Wind-up Value
While MCK’s strategy is to operate its hotels, develop its residential land holdings and continue to hold
its investment properties, we believe that the assets could be readily sold on a hypothetical wind-up
scenario. We have therefore also assessed the potential Wind-up Value of MCK on the basis of an
orderly sale of its component assets.
We note that liquidation would require a special resolution of shareholders and CDL therefore controls
any decision to liquidate MCK via its majority shareholding (and CDI through MCK’s majority ownership
interest in that business). While we understand CDL has no intention of changing its current strategy,
we suggest that the Wind-up Value provides a useful counterfactual valuation benchmark to our Going
Concern Value.
Table 18 below summarises the key assumptions used in evaluating the Wind-up Value.
Table 18: Wind-up Value Assumptions
Category Assumptions
Liquidation period - Given the size and unique nature of MCK’s asset portfolio, we consider it unlikely
that the assets could be readily sold to one purchaser and would need to be sold in
multiple parcels. Even the hotel portfolio would likely necessitate a break-up to
reflect the differing quality and locations of the portfolio.
- Given the number and diversity of the assets owned by MCK, we assume that an
orderly realisation of assets would take 2 – 3 years to complete before the final
proceeds could be distributed to shareholders. This timeframe also reflects the
time required to appoint a liquidator and finalise the liquidation process in line with
New Zealand legal requirements.
NZ Hotels, Sofitel
Brisbane JV and
Surplus Land
- The hotel portfolio contains properties with varying quality and locations and we
believe that some of the hotel assets are likely to attract more buyer interest than
others (e.g. MSocial Auckland vs Copthorne Greymouth). We have therefore
assumed that the portfolio is sold down in tranches. Rather than determining the
order of potential sales on an asset-by-asset basis, we have simply assumed the
portfolio is realised as follows: 40% after 1 year, 30% at the end of year 2 and 30%
at the end of year 3.
- The uncertainty over the sell-down timing is partly accounted for in our assumed
sale values. The mid-point values are based on the 31 December 2024 valuations
but with an allowance for 5% value upside and 5% downside.
- All asset sales are assumed to incur total disposal costs of 2%.
Sydney
Apartments
- We have assumed the sales of the remaining Sydney apartments, commercial
units and carparks are completed within one year, consistent with management’s
es ti mates.
Lease liabilities
and deferred tax
liability
- The majority of the on-going lease liabilities for MCK is related to ground leases
that are in place for a small number of hotels. As the property valuers have either
considered the ground lease payments in the forecast cash flows or excluded their
associated revenue (e.g. carparking revenue in M Social Auckland) when
assessing current market value, we have not made an explicit allowance for the
lease liability in the Wind-up Value scenario.
- We have however assumed that the deferred tax liability arising from depreciation
recovery would crystallize under a wind-up scenario and have made an allowance
for that cost in our estimate of the net liquidation proceeds.
7
Adjusted Net Debt includes lease liabilities mainly related to ground rent (in Copthorne Auckland and Copthorne Greymouth hotels) and carpark leases
(in M Social Auckland and Millennium Rotorua) because these costs are not included in the IFRS16 reported EBITDA. It also includes the incremental new
debt facilities ($30m) utilised to purchase the Christchurch Mayfair hotel post 31 December 2024.
Less Adjusted Net Debt
7
($52.4) ($52.4) ($52.4)
MCK Total Equity Value $689.6 $773.1 $731.3
Fully Diluted Shares on Issue
158,218,286 158,218,286 158,218,286
Value per share ($) $4.36 $4.89 $4.62
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 34
Valuation of MCK
CDI - CDI is assumed to be wound up and liquidated at the same time as MCK with
minority shareholders receiving their proceeds at the end of the realisation period.
- We have assumed CDI’s investment property portfolio is sold at the end of the
liquidation period (2 or 3 years) reflecting our view that these assets are relatively
liquid and will generate stable income over the realisation period. They are
assumed to generate sufficient returns over the liquidation period such that the
eventual sale value will deliver an amount equal to the 31 December 2024 market
value in present value terms. That is, we assume these assets will generate
income and capital appreciation in line with their cost of capital).
- Given the nature of CDI’s residential development activities and the need to
continue development in order to support asset values, we assume that CDI
continues to actively develop and market sections over the realisation period.
Similar to the investment property portfolio, we assume that the cash flows from
ongoing development and section sales generates sufficient returns to justify the
current market valuation of these properties (as of 31 December 2024) in present
value terms.
- To account for the sell-down uncertainty, we have assumed the sale values (in
present value terms) range between 5% below and 5% above their 31 December
2024 market valuations.
Interim Capital
Return
- In order to maximise value from the sell-down, we assume that an interim capital
return is made at the end of year 1 of approximately $130m.
- We have assumed this is achieved through a pro rata share buyback. Given
MCK’s available subscribed capital (and available imputation credits), we assume
that the capital return is non-taxable to shareholders.
Wind-up Costs - We estimate redundancy costs of $7.1 million (based on corporate overhead
salary costs for 6 months) plus $1.0 million for other liquidation related costs (legal,
tax and other wind-up costs).
Net operating cash
flow during
realisation period
- We have assumed that the business would generate annual net cash flows
consistent with MCK’s FY25 budget for the remainder of FY25. We have forecast
FY26 and FY27 operational cash flows consistent with FY25 but reflecting
expected ongoing increases in occupancy rates (to pre-Covid levels by FY27) and
a 3% annual increase in the overall ADR.
- Rental income from CDI’s investment property portfolio and corporate overhead
costs are assumed to be in line with the FY25 budget, with a 3% annual increase
assumed for the remainder the wind-up period.
- Annual capex assumed for FY25-FY27 ($15.9m in FY25, $7.8m in FY26 and
$3.9m in FY27) based on MCK’s capex budget. We have not considered any
additional capex required for other major projects during the wind-up period as the
majority of this capex has been factored in the property market valuations.
- For simplicity, the net cash flows resulting from the on-going business is estimated
to reduce proportionally in line with assumed asset realisations.
- We have allowed for interest income (at 4 %) on the cash proceeds generated from
the orderly realisation of assets.
Present value
calculation
- We estimate the present value of the realisation proceeds from the 2-3 year sell-
down period by discounting the projected cashflows at a nominal, post-tax discount
rate of 10%.
- This rate represents our assessment of the appropriate risk-adjusted return for
MCK’s portfolio which comprises assets with a variety of risk profiles (i .e. higher
risk residential property development vs relatively lower risk investment properties
and hotels).
Source: Northington Partners.
The values of each component of the Wind-up Value are summarised in Table 19 below. In present
value terms, we estimate a total value range between $704.8m and $814.1m. Assuming that the RPS
are not redeemed and will therefore participate in the net proceeds on the same basis as the ordinary
shares (see Section 4.2 above), our valuation equates to $4.45 and $5.15 per share, with a mid-point of
$4.80.
APPENDIX: INDEPENDENT ADVISER’S REPORT
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 35
Valuation of MCK
Table 19: Wind-up Value Summary
Source: Northington Partners analysis.
4.6. Valuation Conclusion
Based on our Going Concern Value and Wind-up Value ranges, we have determined a value range for
MCK of between $696.2 million and $791.1 million, with a mid-point value of $743.6 million. As
summarised in Figure 19, this represents a value per share of $4.40 to $5.00 (with a mid-point of
$4.70).
Figure 19: Assessed MCK Value Range ($ per MCK Share)
Source: Northington Partners analysis.
Our value range for MCK of $4.40 - $5.00 per share compares to MCK’s reported book value per share
of $3.46 as of 31 December 2024. The book value reflects the carrying value for MCK’s assets, which
are recorded at cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment losses. If MCK’s properties are
reported at market value (as was the Company’s accounting policy prior to FY21), our assessment of
the adjusted NAV per share is $5.71 as at 31 December 2024 (prior to tax considerations).
Predominantly allowing for the implied deferred tax on the market revaluations (and to a lesser extent,
capital gains tax on the Sydney Apartments value), MCK’s own assessed market value implied NAV is
$5.39
9
.
Our value range therefore represents a discount to our market value adjusted NAV per share of 13% -
23% (or a 7% - 18% discount to MCK’s reported adjusted NAV of $5.39). This discount largely reflects
Company overheads which are incorporated into our valuation framework but not incorporated into the
property market valuations.
8
Our NPV estimate assumes that a first capital return, equivalent to $130m, would be achieved through a pro rata share buyback in February 2026, with
the remaining realisation proceeds (including accumulated net income) distributed to shareholders at the end of the liquidation period (2 to 3 years).
9
We have excluded the deferred tax impact from our assessed NAV as it represents an accounting value that is highly unlikely to ever become payable.
$4.40
$4.45
$4.36
$5.00
$5.15
$4.89
$3.00$3.50$4.00$4.50$5.00$5.50$6.00
Assessed range
Wind-Up Value
Going Concern Value
$ per MCK share
MCK Wind-Up Value
Low ($m)
(3 years/
-5%)
High ($m)
(2 years/
+5%)
Mid-Point
($m)
MCK net proceeds (ex. CDI) over realisation period
$586.4 $642.5 $614.5
CDI net proceeds over realisation period (MCK 65% share)
$292.0 $312.5 $302.3
Net operating cash flow during realisation period
$36.7 $18.7 $27.7
Redundancy and liquidation/wind-up costs
($8.1) ($8.1) ($8.1)
Net Realisable Value
$907.1 $965.6 $936.3
Net Present Value (2-3 years)
8
$704.8 $814.1 $759.5
Assessed Wind-Up Value per share
$4.45 $5.15 $4.80
NAV at market as
of 31 Dec 2024
$5.71
Reported NAV as
of 31 Dec 2024
$3.46
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 36
Assessment of the Merits of the Offer
5.0 Assessment of the Merits of the Offer
5.1. Comparison of the Offer Price to our Assessed Value of MCK
As set out in Section 4.6, we have assessed the full underlying value of MCK shares in a range
between $4.40 and $5.00 per share, with a mid-point of $4.70 per share.
The full underlying value is the price a person or entity would be expected to pay to acquire the
company as a whole and accordingly includes a premium for control. Although CDL already has
effective control of the Company via its 75.9% shareholding, we believe that the 100% control value of
MCK is the appropriate valuation benchmark for full takeover offers. This represents our estimate of the
value that CDL will acquire for each share if the Offer is successful.
Figure 20 below compares the Offer Price with our assessment of the full underlying value of MCK’s
shares. Given that our mid-point value of $4.70 per share is more than double the Offer Price of $2.25,
we conclude that the Offer significantly undervalues the Company.
Figure 20: Comparison of Offer Price to Assessed Value Range ($ per MCK Share)
(1) NZX traded price represents the volume weighted average ordinary share price during the 20 days prior to the Offer
announcement.
Sources: Northington Partners; NZX; Offer.
Although the Offer Price represents a premium of 29.0% to the 20-day VWAP of MCK’s shares ($1.75)
prior to CDL’s announcement of its intention to make an offer (20 January 2025), we suggest that
MCK’s share price is of limited relevance in this instance. The observed NZX prices relate to trades for
small parcels of shares and reflect that MCK shares are very ill iquid. We suggest the low price (relative
to our assessed value) may also reflect that CDL has control of MCK and is pursuing a strategy which
favours long-term capital appreciation over cash distributions in the short term.
5.2. Consequences for Minority Shareholders if the Offer is not Successful
5.2.1. 90% Minimum Acceptance Condition Not Waived
If the Offer conditions are not fully satisfied or waived by CDL, the Offer will lapse and accepting
shareholders will not receive the Offer Price for their shares. MCK will continue to operate in its current
form and CDL will have a number of options to consider:
- It could simply retain its current shareholding in MCK and continue to operate the Company in
line with the current strategy. Under this scenario, we expect that the price for MCK shares will
continue to trade at a significant discount to our assessed value range because of the lack of
liquidity for MCK shares and ongoing minority discount attributed to small share parcels.
- CDL could increase its shareholding in MCK through the “creep” provisions of the Code. Under
the creep provisions, CDL can acquire up to 5.0% of MCK per 12-month period without having
to make an offer for the Company. However, we note that CDL has already recently utilised
$4.40
$5.00
$4.70
$1.75
$2.25
$-
$1.00
$2.00
$3.00
$4.00
$5.00
$6.00
$7.00
Low
HighMidTraded Price
(NZX)
Offer Price
(1)
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 35
Valuation of MCK
Table 19: Wind-up Value Summary
Source: Northington Partners analysis.
4.6. Valuation Conclusion
Based on our Going Concern Value and Wind-up Value ranges, we have determined a value range for
MCK of between $696.2 million and $791.1 million, with a mid-point value of $743.6 million. As
summarised in Figure 19, this represents a value per share of $4.40 to $5.00 (with a mid-point of
$4.70).
Figure 19: Assessed MCK Value Range ($ per MCK Share)
Source: Northington Partners analysis.
Our value range for MCK of $4.40 - $5.00 per share compares to MCK’s reported book value per share
of $3.46 as of 31 December 2024. The book value reflects the carrying value for MCK’s assets, which
are recorded at cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment losses. If MCK’s properties are
reported at market value (as was the Company’s accounting policy prior to FY21), our assessment of
the adjusted NAV per share is $5.71 as at 31 December 2024 (prior to tax considerations).
Predominantly allowing for the implied deferred tax on the market revaluations (and to a lesser extent,
capital gains tax on the Sydney Apartments value), MCK’s own assessed market value implied NAV is
$5.39
9
.
Our value range therefore represents a discount to our market value adjusted NAV per share of 13% -
23% (or a 7% - 18% discount to MCK’s reported adjusted NAV of $5.39). This discount largely reflects
Company overheads which are incorporated into our valuation framework but not incorporated into the
property market valuations.
8
Our NPV estimate assumes that a first capital return, equivalent to $130m, would be achieved through a pro rata share buyback in February 2026, with
the remaining realisation proceeds (including accumulated net income) distributed to shareholders at the end of the liquidation period (2 to 3 years).
9
We have excluded the deferred tax impact from our assessed NAV as it represents an accounting value that is highly unlikely to ever become payable.
$4.40
$4.45
$4.36
$5.00
$5.15
$4.89
$3.00$3.50$4.00$4.50$5.00$5.50$6.00
Assessed range
Wind-Up Value
Going Concern Value
$ per MCK share
MCK Wind-Up Value
Low ($m)
(3 years/
-5%)
High ($m)
(2 years/
+5%)
Mid-Point
($m)
MCK net proceeds (ex. CDI) over realisation period
$586.4 $642.5 $614.5
CDI net proceeds over realisation period (MCK 65% share)
$292.0 $312.5 $302.3
Net operating cash flow during realisation period
$36.7 $18.7 $27.7
Redundancy and liquidation/wind-up costs
($8.1) ($8.1) ($8.1)
Net Realisable Value
$907.1 $965.6 $936.3
Net Present Value (2-3 years)
8
$704.8 $814.1 $759.5
Assessed Wind-Up Value per share
$4.45 $5.15 $4.80
NAV at market as
of 31 Dec 2024
$5.71
Reported NAV as
of 31 Dec 2024
$3.46
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 36
Assessment of the Merits of the Offer
5.0 Assessment of the Merits of the Offer
5.1. Comparison of the Offer Price to our Assessed Value of MCK
As set out in Section 4.6, we have assessed the full underlying value of MCK shares in a range
between $4.40 and $5.00 per share, with a mid-point of $4.70 per share.
The full underlying value is the price a person or entity would be expected to pay to acquire the
company as a whole and accordingly includes a premium for control. Although CDL already has
effective control of the Company via its 75.9% shareholding, we believe that the 100% control value of
MCK is the appropriate valuation benchmark for full takeover offers. This represents our estimate of the
value that CDL will acquire for each share if the Offer is successful.
Figure 20 below compares the Offer Price with our assessment of the full underlying value of MCK’s
shares. Given that our mid-point value of $4.70 per share is more than double the Offer Price of $2.25,
we conclude that the Offer significantly undervalues the Company.
Figure 20: Comparison of Offer Price to Assessed Value Range ($ per MCK Share)
(1) NZX traded price represents the volume weighted average ordinary share price during the 20 days prior to the Offer
announcement.
Sources: Northington Partners; NZX; Offer.
Although the Offer Price represents a premium of 29.0% to the 20-day VWAP of MCK’s shares ($1.75)
prior to CDL’s announcement of its intention to make an offer (20 January 2025), we suggest that
MCK’s share price is of limited relevance in this instance. The observed NZX prices relate to trades for
small parcels of shares and reflect that MCK shares are very ill iquid. We suggest the low price (relative
to our assessed value) may also reflect that CDL has control of MCK and is pursuing a strategy which
favours long-term capital appreciation over cash distributions in the short term.
5.2. Consequences for Minority Shareholders if the Offer is not Successful
5.2.1. 90% Minimum Acceptance Condition Not Waived
If the Offer conditions are not fully satisfied or waived by CDL, the Offer will lapse and accepting
shareholders will not receive the Offer Price for their shares. MCK will continue to operate in its current
form and CDL will have a number of options to consider:
- It could simply retain its current shareholding in MCK and continue to operate the Company in
line with the current strategy. Under this scenario, we expect that the price for MCK shares will
continue to trade at a significant discount to our assessed value range because of the lack of
liquidity for MCK shares and ongoing minority discount attributed to small share parcels.
- CDL could increase its shareholding in MCK through the “creep” provisions of the Code. Under
the creep provisions, CDL can acquire up to 5.0% of MCK per 12-month period without having
to make an offer for the Company. However, we note that CDL has already recently utilised
$4.40
$5.00
$4.70
$1.75
$2.25
$-
$1.00
$2.00
$3.00
$4.00
$5.00
$6.00
$7.00
LowHighMidTraded Price
(NZX)
Offer Price
(1)
APPENDIX: INDEPENDENT ADVISER’S REPORT
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 37
Assessment of the Merits of the Offer
the creep provisions acquiring 5.0% of MCK through the on-market purchase of 5.3m shares
on 29 October 2024 (increasing its voting control from 70.9% to 75.9%). Therefore, CDL could
not increase its shareholding through the creep provisions until after 29 October 2025.
- CDL could attempt another full takeover at some point in the future. Presumably the new offer
would be made at a higher price to improve the likelihood of receiving acceptances which
would take CDL’s shareholding above the 90% threshold.
We note there is no certainty that CDL will launch a new takeover offer. If that doesn’t eventuate, the
low level of liquidity means that minority shareholders may have limited ability to exit their investment in
MCK for the foreseeable future.
5.2.2. 90% Minimum Acceptance Condition Waived
CDL is entitled to waive the 90% acceptance condition and increase its shareholding to the extent of
any acceptances received. This would result in CDL owning between 76% - 89.9% of the shares on
issue in MCK when the Offer closes. Although under this scenario the future options available to CDL
as outlined above would still apply, we note that:
- Market liquidity for the shares is likely to be further reduced given the lower number of free-
float shares available for trading.
- CDL could not utilise the creep provisions of the Code until 12 months after the Offer has
closed. If the shares acquired under these provisions resulted in CDL holding more than 90%
of the shares on issue, any shares subsequently acquired under the compulsory acquisition
provisions of the Code would need to be at a price per share that was certified as fair and
reasonable by an independent expert.
- Any new offer (and potentially a higher offer price) would only apply to the outstanding shares
at that time. In certain circumstances if CDL reaches the 90% acceptance level to compulsorily
acquire the remaining shares, shareholders may have objection rights in relation to the price
offered for their shares (whereby the price paid to objecting shareholders will be the fair and
reasonable price certified by an independent expert).
5.2.3. Likelihood of Alternative Offers
In our view, the likelihood of an alternative takeover offer emerging for MCK is extremely low. As the
Offeror already controls 75.9% of the voting rights in the Company, any alternative takeover offer would
require the support of the Offeror. For the Offeror to sell into an alternative offer would constitute a
significant about-turn, given it has clearly signalled through the Offer that it intends to exercise its rights
as the dominant owner to compulsorily acquire any shares which are not acquired under the Offer.
Therefore, the likelihood of shareholders receiving better value for their shares than under the current
Offer is dependent on CDL’s propensity to increase the Offer Price under the current Offer (which it is
entitled to do under the Code) or to make a new offer at some point in the future.
5.3. Outcomes if the Offer is Successful
If the Offer receives acceptances which will increase CDL’s shareholding over 90%, the Offeror will
become the dominant owner under Rule 50 of the Code and CDL has stated that it intends to
compulsorily acquire any shares which are not acquired under the Offer. In this situation, all
shareholders will receive the Offer Price for their shares ($2.25) irrespective of whether they accepted
the Offer or not.
5.4. Ability to Exit at Known Price
While the Offer Price of $2.25 per MCK share is considerably lower than our assessed value range of
$4.40 to $5.00 per share, some shareholders may see the Offer as an opportunity to exit their
investment in MCK at a known price (without brokerage costs). As discussed above, MCK shares are
highly illiquid and will remain so if the Offer is unsuccessful. Given the uncertainties relating to the share
price and market liquidity after the Offer has closed, some shareholders may accept a price lower than
the perceived value of the shares in return for a certain exit.
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 38
Appendix 1
Appendix 1. Sources of Information Used in this Report
Other than the information sources referenced directly in the body of the report, this assessment is
reliant on the following sources of information:
- MCK’s annual reports and announcements.
- MCK’s property valuation reports desktop valuation updates from CVAS (NZ) Limited trading
as Colliers and Bower Valuations Limited.
- MCK’s FY24 financial results and FY25 budget.
- CDI’s FY24 financial results.
- MCK’s hotel operating statistics (historical and budget).
- MCK’s 5-year capex budget.
- Discussions with senior personnel of MCK.
- Various other documents that we considered necessary for the purposes of our analysis.
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 37
Assessment of the Merits of the Offer
the creep provisions acquiring 5.0% of MCK through the on-market purchase of 5.3m shares
on 29 October 2024 (increasing its voting control from 70.9% to 75.9%). Therefore, CDL could
not increase its shareholding through the creep provisions until after 29 October 2025.
- CDL could attempt another full takeover at some point in the future. Presumably the new offer
would be made at a higher price to improve the likelihood of receiving acceptances which
would take CDL’s shareholding above the 90% threshold.
We note there is no certainty that CDL will launch a new takeover offer. If that doesn’t eventuate, the
low level of liquidity means that minority shareholders may have limited ability to exit their investment in
MCK for the foreseeable future.
5.2.2. 90% Minimum Acceptance Condition Waived
CDL is entitled to waive the 90% acceptance condition and increase its shareholding to the extent of
any acceptances received. This would result in CDL owning between 76% - 89.9% of the shares on
issue in MCK when the Offer closes. Although under this scenario the future options available to CDL
as outlined above would still apply, we note that:
- Market liquidity for the shares is likely to be further reduced given the lower number of free-
float shares available for trading.
- CDL could not utilise the creep provisions of the Code until 12 months after the Offer has
closed. If the shares acquired under these provisions resulted in CDL holding more than 90%
of the shares on issue, any shares subsequently acquired under the compulsory acquisition
provisions of the Code would need to be at a price per share that was certified as fair and
reasonable by an independent expert.
- Any new offer (and potentially a higher offer price) would only apply to the outstanding shares
at that time. In certain circumstances if CDL reaches the 90% acceptance level to compulsorily
acquire the remaining shares, shareholders may have objection rights in relation to the price
offered for their shares (whereby the price paid to objecting shareholders will be the fair and
reasonable price certified by an independent expert).
5.2.3. Likelihood of Alternative Offers
In our view, the likelihood of an alternative takeover offer emerging for MCK is extremely low. As the
Offeror already controls 75.9% of the voting rights in the Company, any alternative takeover offer would
require the support of the Offeror. For the Offeror to sell into an alternative offer would constitute a
significant about-turn, given it has clearly signalled through the Offer that it intends to exercise its rights
as the dominant owner to compulsorily acquire any shares which are not acquired under the Offer.
Therefore, the likelihood of shareholders receiving better value for their shares than under the current
Offer is dependent on CDL’s propensity to increase the Offer Price under the current Offer (which it is
entitled to do under the Code) or to make a new offer at some point in the future.
5.3. Outcomes if the Offer is Successful
If the Offer receives acceptances which will increase CDL’s shareholding over 90%, the Offeror will
become the dominant owner under Rule 50 of the Code and CDL has stated that it intends to
compulsorily acquire any shares which are not acquired under the Offer. In this situation, all
shareholders will receive the Offer Price for their shares ($2.25) irrespective of whether they accepted
the Offer or not.
5.4. Ability to Exit at Known Price
While the Offer Price of $2.25 per MCK share is considerably lower than our assessed value range of
$4.40 to $5.00 per share, some shareholders may see the Offer as an opportunity to exit their
investment in MCK at a known price (without brokerage costs). As discussed above, MCK shares are
highly illiquid and will remain so if the Offer is unsuccessful. Given the uncertainties relating to the share
price and market liquidity after the Offer has closed, some shareholders may accept a price lower than
the perceived value of the shares in return for a certain exit.
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 38
Appendix 1
Appendix 1. Sources of Information Used in this Report
Other than the information sources referenced directly in the body of the report, this assessment is
reliant on the following sources of information:
- MCK’s annual reports and announcements.
- MCK’s property valuation reports desktop valuation updates from CVAS (NZ) Limited trading
as Colliers and Bower Valuations Limited.
- MCK’s FY24 financial results and FY25 budget.
- CDI’s FY24 financial results.
- MCK’s hotel operating statistics (historical and budget).
- MCK’s 5-year capex budget.
- Discussions with senior personnel of MCK.
- Various other documents that we considered necessary for the purposes of our analysis.
APPENDIX: INDEPENDENT ADVISER’S REPORT
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 39
Appendix 2
Appendix 2. Declarations, Qualifications and Consents
Declarations
This report is dated 24 February 2025 and has been prepared by Northington Partners at the request of
the directors of MCK to fulfil the reporting requirements pursuant to Rule 21 of the Code. This report, or
any part of it, should not be reproduced or used for any other purpose. Northington Partners
specifically disclaims any obligation or liability to any party whatsoever in the event that this report is
supplied or applied for any purpose other than that for which it is intended.
Prior drafts of this report were provided to MCK for review and discussion. Although minor factual
changes to the report were made after the release of the first draft, there were no changes to our
methodology, analysis, or conclusions.
This report is provided for the benefit of all of the Non-associated Shareholders of MCK that are being
asked to consider the Offer, and Northington Partners consents to the distribution of this report to those
people.
Our engagement terms did not contain any term which materially restricted the scope of our work.
Qualifications
Northington Partners provides an independent corporate advisory service to companies operating
throughout New Zealand. The company specialises in mergers and acquisitions, capital raising
support, expert opinions, financial instrument valuations, and business and share valuations.
Northington Partners is retained by a mix of publicly listed companies, substantial privately held
companies, and state-owned enterprises.
The individuals responsible for preparing this report are Greg Anderson B.Com, M.Com (Hons), Ph.D,
Jonathan Burke B.Com (Hons), BCM, and Pedro Monteiro B.Com, MBA. Each individual has a wealth
of experience in providing independent advice to clients relating to the value of business assets and
equity instruments, as well as the choice of appropriate financial structures and governance issues.
Northington Partners has been responsible for the preparation of numerous independent reports in
relation to takeovers, mergers, and a range of other transactions subject to the Takeovers Code and
NZX Listing Rules.
Independence
Northington Partners has not been previously engaged by MCK or (to the best of our knowledge) by
any other party to the Offer in relation to any matter for the Offer that could affect our independence.
None of the Directors or employees of Northington Partners have any other relationship with any of the
directors or substantial security holders of the parties involved in the Offer.
The preparation of this independent report will be Northington Partners’ only involvement in relation to
the Offer. Northington Partners will be paid a fixed fee for its services which is in no way contingent on
the outcome of our analysis or the content of our report.
Northington Partners does not have any conflict of interest that could affect its ability to provide an
unbiased report.
Disclaimer and Restrictions on the Scope of Our Work
In preparing this report, Northington Partners has relied on information provided by MCK. Northington
Partners has not performed anything in the nature of an audit of that information, and does not express
any opinion on the reliability, accuracy, or completeness of the information provided to us and upon
which we have relied.
Northington Partners has used the provided information on the basis that it is true and accurate in
material respects and not misleading by reason of omission or otherwise. Accordingly, neither
Northington Partners nor its directors, employees or agents, accept any responsibility or liability for any
such information being inaccurate, incomplete, unreliable or not soundly based or for any errors in the
analysis, statements and opinions provided in this report resulting directly or indirectly from any such
circumstances or from any assumptions upon which this report is based proving unjustified.
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 40
Appendix 2
We reserve the right, but will be under no obligation, to review or amend our report if any additional
information which was in existence on the date of this report was not brought to our attention, or
subsequently comes to light.
Indemnity
MCK has agreed to indemnify Northington Partners (to the maximum extent permitted by law) for all
claims, proceedings, damages, losses (including consequential losses), fines, penalties, costs, charges
and expenses (including legal fees and disbursements) suffered or incurred by Northington Partners in
relation to the preparation of this report, except to the extent resulting from any act or omission of
Northington Partners finally determined by a New Zealand Court of competent jurisdiction to constitute
negligence or bad faith by Northington Partners.
MCK has also agreed to promptly fund Northington Partners for its reasonable costs and expenses
(including legal fees and expenses) in dealing with such claims or proceedings upon presentation by
Northington Partners of the relevant invoices.
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 39
Appendix 2
Appendix 2. Declarations, Qualifications and Consents
Declarations
This report is dated 24 February 2025 and has been prepared by Northington Partners at the request of
the directors of MCK to fulfil the reporting requirements pursuant to Rule 21 of the Code. This report, or
any part of it, should not be reproduced or used for any other purpose. Northington Partners
specifically disclaims any obligation or liability to any party whatsoever in the event that this report is
supplied or applied for any purpose other than that for which it is intended.
Prior drafts of this report were provided to MCK for review and discussion. Although minor factual
changes to the report were made after the release of the first draft, there were no changes to our
methodology, analysis, or conclusions.
This report is provided for the benefit of all of the Non-associated Shareholders of MCK that are being
asked to consider the Offer, and Northington Partners consents to the distribution of this report to those
people.
Our engagement terms did not contain any term which materially restricted the scope of our work.
Qualifications
Northington Partners provides an independent corporate advisory service to companies operating
throughout New Zealand. The company specialises in mergers and acquisitions, capital raising
support, expert opinions, financial instrument valuations, and business and share valuations.
Northington Partners is retained by a mix of publicly listed companies, substantial privately held
companies, and state-owned enterprises.
The individuals responsible for preparing this report are Greg Anderson B.Com, M.Com (Hons), Ph.D,
Jonathan Burke B.Com (Hons), BCM, and Pedro Monteiro B.Com, MBA. Each individual has a wealth
of experience in providing independent advice to clients relating to the value of business assets and
equity instruments, as well as the choice of appropriate financial structures and governance issues.
Northington Partners has been responsible for the preparation of numerous independent reports in
relation to takeovers, mergers, and a range of other transactions subject to the Takeovers Code and
NZX Listing Rules.
Independence
Northington Partners has not been previously engaged by MCK or (to the best of our knowledge) by
any other party to the Offer in relation to any matter for the Offer that could affect our independence.
None of the Directors or employees of Northington Partners have any other relationship with any of the
directors or substantial security holders of the parties involved in the Offer.
The preparation of this independent report will be Northington Partners’ only involvement in relation to
the Offer. Northington Partners will be paid a fixed fee for its services which is in no way contingent on
the outcome of our analysis or the content of our report.
Northington Partners does not have any conflict of interest that could affect its ability to provide an
unbiased report.
Disclaimer and Restrictions on the Scope of Our Work
In preparing this report, Northington Partners has relied on information provided by MCK. Northington
Partners has not performed anything in the nature of an audit of that information, and does not express
any opinion on the reliability, accuracy, or completeness of the information provided to us and upon
which we have relied.
Northington Partners has used the provided information on the basis that it is true and accurate in
material respects and not misleading by reason of omission or otherwise. Accordingly, neither
Northington Partners nor its directors, employees or agents, accept any responsibility or liability for any
such information being inaccurate, incomplete, unreliable or not soundly based or for any errors in the
analysis, statements and opinions provided in this report resulting directly or indirectly from any such
circumstances or from any assumptions upon which this report is based proving unjustified.
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 40
Appendix 2
We reserve the right, but will be under no obligation, to review or amend our report if any additional
information which was in existence on the date of this report was not brought to our attention, or
subsequently comes to light.
Indemnity
MCK has agreed to indemnify Northington Partners (to the maximum extent permitted by law) for all
claims, proceedings, damages, losses (including consequential losses), fines, penalties, costs, charges
and expenses (including legal fees and disbursements) suffered or incurred by Northington Partners in
relation to the preparation of this report, except to the extent resulting from any act or omission of
Northington Partners finally determined by a New Zealand Court of competent jurisdiction to constitute
negligence or bad faith by Northington Partners.
MCK has also agreed to promptly fund Northington Partners for its reasonable costs and expenses
(including legal fees and expenses) in dealing with such claims or proceedings upon presentation by
Northington Partners of the relevant invoices.
APPENDIX: INDEPENDENT ADVISER’S REPORT
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report
Page |
41
Appendix 3
Appendix 3.
MCK Property Portfolio Market Valuation Details
Property/Location
Property
Valuation
($m)
Valuation
reporting date
Valuer
Valuation method used
Key
valuation assumptions
Discount
rate
Cap.
rate
Price per
room/sq
m ($k)
MSocial Auckland
97,500
31
-
Dec
-
24
Bower Valuations L
imited
Average of DCF and Transaction Comparables methods less an allowance for business disruption and costs of sale
6.25%
5.50%
560
Copthorne Auckland City
10,750
31
-
Dec
-
24
CVAS (NZ) Limited
t/
a Colliers
Average of Capitalised Income, DCF and Transaction Comparables (price per room) methods less an allowance for estimated Capex
11.00%
9.50%
150
Copthorne Bay of Islands
19,250
31
-
Dec
-
24
CVAS (NZ) Limited
t/
a Colliers
Average of Capitalised Income, DCF and Transaction Comparables (price per room) methods less an allowance for estimated Capex
12.00%
10.50%
125
Kingsgate Dunedin
5,200
31
-
Jan
-
25
Bower Valuations L
imited
Transaction Comparables
(price per room) cross
-
checked with DCF and
Capitalised Income
8.50%
8.00%
95
Copthorne Greymouth
11,000
31
-
Jan
-
25
Bower Valuations L
imited
Average of DCF, Capitalised Income and Transaction Comparables
(price per room) methods less an allowance for estimated Capex
9.25%
8.25%
210
Millennium New Plymouth
11,250
31
-
Dec
-
24
CVAS (NZ) Limited
t/
a Colliers
Average of Capitalised Income, DCF and Transaction Comparables
(price per room) methods
10.00%
8.50%
275
Copthorne Palmerston North
10,200
31
-
Dec
-
24
CVAS (NZ) Limited
t/
a Colliers
Average of Capitalised Income, DCF and Transaction Comparables
(price per room) methods less an allowance for estimated Capex
10.50%
9.
0
0%
150
Millennium Queenstown
100,000
11
-
Feb
-
25
CVAS (NZ) Limited
t/
a Colliers
Average of Capitalised Income, DCF and Transaction Comparables
(price per room) methods less an allowance for estimated Capex
9.00%
7.25%
475
Copthorne Queenstown Lakefront
82,000
11
-
Feb
-
25
CVAS (NZ) Limited
t/
a Colliers
Average of Capitalised Income, DCF and Transaction Comparables (price per room) methods less an allowance for estimated Capex
9.00%
7.50%
375
Copthorne Queenstown Lakeview
21,940
31
-
Jan
-
25
Bower Valuations L
imited
Transaction Comparables
(price per room) cross
-
checked with DCF and
Capitalised Income
9.25%
8.50%
484
Millennium Rotorua
66,000
11
-
Feb
-
25
CVAS (NZ) Limited
t/
a Colliers
Average of Capitalised Income, DCF and Transaction Comparables
(price per room) methods less an allowance for estimated Capex
9.75%
8.25%
315
Kingsgate Te Anau
10,000
31
-
Jan
-
25
Bower Valuations L
imited
Average of DCF, Capitalised Income and Transaction Comparables
(price per room) methods less an allowance for estimated Capex
8.75%
8.00%
1
50
Copthorne Wellington
22,750
31
-
Dec
-
24
CVAS (NZ) Limited
t/
a Colliers
Average of Capitalised Income, DCF and Transaction Comparables
(price per room) methods
10.75%
9.25%
200
Copthorne Rotorua
10,100
31
-
Dec
-
24
CVAS (NZ) Limited
t/
a Colliers
Land value deducted by an allowance for demolition costs
n/a
n/a
0
.4
/sqm
Queenstown
(surplus land)
18,000
31
-
Jan
-
25
Bower Valuations
L
imited
Market comparison
(rate per sqm)
n/a
n/a
2.5
Palmerston North
(surplus land)
6,300
31
-
Dec
-
24
CVAS (NZ) Limited
t/
a Colliers
Market comparison
(rate per sqm)
n/a
n/a
0.6
Rotorua
(surplus land)
5,675
31
-
Dec
-
24
CVAS (NZ) Limited
t/
a Colliers
Market comparison
(rate per sqm)
n/a
n/a
0.4
Te Anau
(surplus land)
1,900
31
-
Jan
-
25
Bower Valuations
L
imited
Market comparison
(rate per sqm)
n/a
n/a
n/a
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 42
Appendix 4
Appendix 4. Comparable Companies and Transactions
EBITDA Multiples of Comparable Trading Companies
Company Country
Market Cap
($NZ m)
Enterprise
Value ($NZ m)
EV/EBITDA Multiple
LTM NTM
Asset-light hotel operators
Marriott International United States 149,387 174,267 22.3 x 18.8 x
Hilton Worldwide Holdings United States 114,752 133,745 29.0 x 20.4 x
InterContinental Hotels Group United Kingdom 37,674 42,493 23.4 x 19.2 x
Hyatt Hotels Corporation United States 27,858 31,918 21.5 x 15.8 x
Wyndham Hotels & Resorts United States 14,914 19,185 17.7 x 14.8 x
Choice Hotels International United States 12,696 15,989 18.1 x 15.1 x
Scandic Hotels Group AB Sweden 2,817 9,890 9.3 x 8.9 x
Average (Asset-light)
20.2 x 16.1 x
Median (Asset-light)
21.5 x 15.8 x
Asset-heavy hotel operators
Accor SA France 21,797 27,902 13.9 x 12.8 x
City Developments Ltd Singapore 5,905 20,746 19.7 x 13.8 x
Minor International Ltd Thailand 7,563 17,236 8.0 x 7.2 x
Shangri-La Asia Ltd Hong Kong 4,361 14,116 9.8 x 15.5 x
Pandox AB Sweden 6,311 12,420 19.5 x 17.9 x
CapitaLand Ascott Trust Singapore 4,314 7,978 18.4 x 17.3 x
Meliá Hotels International Spain 2,915 7,711 8.1 x 7.7 x
Hotel Properties Ltd Singapore 2,432 4,821 34.0 x n/a
Playa Hotels & Resorts N.V. Netherlands 2,782 4,313 10.1 x 10.0 x
Mandarin Oriental International Hong Kong 3,911 4,296 17.5 x n/a
PPHE Hotel Group Netherlands 1,214 4,026 14.0 x 12.8 x
Dalata Hotel Group Ireland 1,829 3,551 8.6 x 8.4 x
EVT Limited Australia 2,086 3,435 11.0 x 10.4 x
CDL Hospitality Trusts Singapore 1,354 3,195 22.0 x 18.7 x
Far East Orchard Ltd Singapore 657 1,332 13.7 x n/a
Banyan Tree Holdings Ltd Singapore 379 884 13.5 x n/a
Amara Holdings Ltd Singapore 454 863 20.4 x n/a
Heeton Holdings Ltd Singapore 172 756 19.5 x n/a
Hotel Grand Central Ltd Singapore 691 401 8.0 x n/a
Stamford Land Corporation Ltd Singapore 727 362 5.7 x n/a
Average (Asset-heavy)
14.8 x 12.7 x
Median (Asset-heavy)
13.8 x 12.8 x
Source: S&P Capital IQ (10 February 2025)
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report
Page |
41
Appendix 3
Appendix 3.
MCK Property Portfolio Market Valuation Details
Property/Location
Property
Valuation
($m)
Valuation
reporting date
Valuer
Valuation method used
Key
valuation assumptions
Discount
rate
Cap.
rate
Price per
room/sq
m ($k)
MSocial Auckland
97,500
31
-
Dec
-
24
Bower Valuations L
imited
Average of DCF and Transaction Comparables methods less an allowance for business disruption and costs of sale
6.25%
5.50%
560
Copthorne Auckland City
10,750
31
-
Dec
-
24
CVAS (NZ) Limited
t/
a Colliers
Average of Capitalised Income, DCF and Transaction Comparables (price per room) methods less an allowance for estimated Capex
11.00%
9.50%
150
Copthorne Bay of Islands
19,250
31
-
Dec
-
24
CVAS (NZ) Limited
t/
a Colliers
Average of Capitalised Income, DCF and Transaction Comparables (price per room) methods less an allowance for estimated Capex
12.00%
10.50%
125
Kingsgate Dunedin
5,200
31
-
Jan
-
25
Bower Valuations L
imited
Transaction Comparables
(price per room) cross
-
checked with DCF and
Capitalised Income
8.50%
8.00%
95
Copthorne Greymouth
11,000
31
-
Jan
-
25
Bower Valuations L
imited
Average of DCF, Capitalised Income and Transaction Comparables
(price per room) methods less an allowance for estimated Capex
9.25%
8.25%
210
Millennium New Plymouth
11,250
31
-
Dec
-
24
CVAS (NZ) Limited
t/
a Colliers
Average of Capitalised Income, DCF and Transaction Comparables
(price per room) methods
10.00%
8.50%
275
Copthorne Palmerston North
10,200
31
-
Dec
-
24
CVAS (NZ) Limited
t/
a Colliers
Average of Capitalised Income, DCF and Transaction Comparables
(price per room) methods less an allowance for estimated Capex
10.50%
9.
0
0%
150
Millennium Queenstown
100,000
11
-
Feb
-
25
CVAS (NZ) Limited
t/
a Colliers
Average of Capitalised Income, DCF and Transaction Comparables
(price per room) methods less an allowance for estimated Capex
9.00%
7.25%
475
Copthorne Queenstown Lakefront
82,000
11
-
Feb
-
25
CVAS (NZ) Limited
t/
a Colliers
Average of Capitalised Income, DCF and Transaction Comparables (price per room) methods less an allowance for estimated Capex
9.00%
7.50%
375
Copthorne Queenstown Lakeview
21,940
31
-
Jan
-
25
Bower Valuations L
imited
Transaction Comparables
(price per room) cross
-
checked with DCF and
Capitalised Income
9.25%
8.50%
484
Millennium Rotorua
66,000
11
-
Feb
-
25
CVAS (NZ) Limited
t/
a Colliers
Average of Capitalised Income, DCF and Transaction Comparables
(price per room) methods less an allowance for estimated Capex
9.75%
8.25%
315
Kingsgate Te Anau
10,000
31
-
Jan
-
25
Bower Valuations L
imited
Average of DCF, Capitalised Income and Transaction Comparables
(price per room) methods less an allowance for estimated Capex
8.75%
8.00%
1
50
Copthorne Wellington
22,750
31
-
Dec
-
24
CVAS (NZ) Limited
t/
a Colliers
Average of Capitalised Income, DCF and Transaction Comparables
(price per room) methods
10.75%
9.25%
200
Copthorne Rotorua
10,100
31
-
Dec
-
24
CVAS (NZ) Limited
t/
a Colliers
Land value deducted by an allowance for demolition costs
n/a
n/a
0
.4
/sqm
Queenstown
(surplus land)
18,000
31
-
Jan
-
25
Bower Valuations
L
imited
Market comparison
(rate per sqm)
n/a
n/a
2.5
Palmerston North
(surplus land)
6,300
31
-
Dec
-
24
CVAS (NZ) Limited
t/
a Colliers
Market comparison
(rate per sqm)
n/a
n/a
0.6
Rotorua
(surplus land)
5,675
31
-
Dec
-
24
CVAS (NZ) Limited
t/
a Colliers
Market comparison
(rate per sqm)
n/a
n/a
0.4
Te Anau
(surplus land)
1,900
31
-
Jan
-
25
Bower Valuations
L
imited
Market comparison
(rate per sqm)
n/a
n/a
n/a
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 42
Appendix 4
Appendix 4. Comparable Companies and Transactions
EBITDA Multiples of Comparable Trading Companies
Company Country
Market Cap
($NZ m)
Enterprise
Value ($NZ m)
EV/EBITDA Multiple
LTM NTM
Asset-light hotel operators
Marriott International United States 149,387 174,267 22.3 x 18.8 x
Hilton Worldwide Holdings United States 114,752 133,745 29.0 x 20.4 x
InterContinental Hotels Group United Kingdom 37,674 42,493 23.4 x 19.2 x
Hyatt Hotels Corporation United States 27,858 31,918 21.5 x 15.8 x
Wyndham Hotels & Resorts United States 14,914 19,185 17.7 x 14.8 x
Choice Hotels International United States 12,696 15,989 18.1 x 15.1 x
Scandic Hotels Group AB Sweden 2,817 9,890 9.3 x 8.9 x
Average (Asset-light)
20.2 x 16.1 x
Median (Asset-light)
21.5 x 15.8 x
Asset-heavy hotel operators
Accor SA France 21,797 27,902 13.9 x 12.8 x
City Developments Ltd Singapore 5,905 20,746 19.7 x 13.8 x
Minor International Ltd Thailand 7,563 17,236 8.0 x 7.2 x
Shangri-La Asia Ltd Hong Kong 4,361 14,116 9.8 x 15.5 x
Pandox AB Sweden 6,311 12,420 19.5 x 17.9 x
CapitaLand Ascott Trust Singapore 4,314 7,978 18.4 x 17.3 x
Meliá Hotels International Spain 2,915 7,711 8.1 x 7.7 x
Hotel Properties Ltd Singapore 2,432 4,821 34.0 x n/a
Playa Hotels & Resorts N.V. Netherlands 2,782 4,313 10.1 x 10.0 x
Mandarin Oriental International Hong Kong 3,911 4,296 17.5 x n/a
PPHE Hotel Group Netherlands 1,214 4,026 14.0 x 12.8 x
Dalata Hotel Group Ireland 1,829 3,551 8.6 x 8.4 x
EVT Limited Australia 2,086 3,435 11.0 x 10.4 x
CDL Hospitality Trusts Singapore 1,354 3,195 22.0 x 18.7 x
Far East Orchard Ltd Singapore 657 1,332 13.7 x n/a
Banyan Tree Holdings Ltd Singapore 379 884 13.5 x n/a
Amara Holdings Ltd Singapore 454 863 20.4 x n/a
Heeton Holdings Ltd Singapore 172 756 19.5 x n/a
Hotel Grand Central Ltd Singapore 691 401 8.0 x n/a
Stamford Land Corporation Ltd Singapore 727 362 5.7 x n/a
Average (Asset-heavy)
14.8 x 12.7 x
Median (Asset-heavy)
13.8 x 12.8 x
Source: S&P Capital IQ (10 February 2025)
APPENDIX: INDEPENDENT ADVISER’S REPORT
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 43
Appendix 4
EBITDA Multiples of Comparable Transactions
Target Acquirer Location Date
Transaction
Value ($m)
EV / LTM
EBITDA
EV / NTM
EBITDA
Millennium & Copthorne Related Transactions
Mayfair Luxury Hotels
Limited
Millennium & Copthorne
Hotels NZ Ltd
New Zealand 23/10/2024 32 n/a 15.0 x
Sofitel Brisbane Central
Hotel
Millennium & Copthorne
Hotels NZ Ltd; City
Developments Ltd
Australia 15/12/2023 191 n/a 17.9 x
Millennium & Copthorne
Hotels plc (35% share)
City Developments Ltd United
Kingdom
7/06/2019 1,484 16.5 x 16.2 x
Average
569 16.5 x 16.4 x
Median
191 16.5 x 16.2 x
Other Transactions
Eumundi Group SEQ Hospitality Group Australia 30/10/2024 117 13.7 x n/a
Hilton Boston Back Bay Certares Management;
Belcourt Capital Partners
United States 29/02/2024 281 10.2 x n/a
Amara Holdings (73%) Dymon Asia Private Equity Singapore 14/11/2023 710 19.0 x n/a
Alloggio Group Next Capital Australia 27/03/2023 115 10.8 x n/a
Sofitel Philadelphia Hotel Investor Group United States 3/08/2022 128 21.1 x n/a
easyHotel ICAMAP; Cadim Fonds United
Kingdom
5/08/2019 223 n/a 21.8 x
Radisson Hospitality (49%) Jinjiang International
Holdings
Belgium 11/12/2018 1,024 6.9 x 5.9 x
The Ritz-Carlton, Lake
Tahoe
Braemar Hotels & Resorts United States 13/11/2018 165 13.4 x n/a
Hilton Alexandria Old Town Ashford Hospitality Trust United States 26/06/2018 162 12.1 x n/a
NH Hotel Group (18%) Minor International Group Spain 6/06/2018 704 12.6 x 10.5 x
AccorInvest Group (58%) GIC; Colony NorthStar;
Crédit Agricole; Amundi
Luxembourg 27/02/2018 7,661 12.0 x n/a
Mantra Group AAPC Limited Australia 9/10/2017 1,502 13.0 x 11.6 x
Crowne Plaza Hotel Atlanta
at Ravinia
Hospitality Properties Trust United States 29/06/2017 121 15.3 x n/a
Park Hyatt Beaver Creek
Resort and Spa
Ashford Hospitality Prime
(Braemar Hotels & Resorts)
United States 10/03/2017 210 14.9 x n/a
Global Premium Hotels
(35%)
Investor Group Singapore 23/02/2017 152 29.0 x n/a
Hilton Garden Inn,
Chelsea, New York
Investor Group United States 14/07/2016 90 13.5 x n/a
Starwood Hotels & Resorts
Worldwide
Marriott International United States 16/11/2015 23,413 13.5 x 13.4 x
Jupiter Hotels Holdings Fico Holding; S Hotels and
Resorts
United
Kingdom
12/10/2015 353 13.8 x n/a
Average (Tier 2) 2, 063 14.4 x 12.6 x
Median (Tier 2) 217 13.5 x 11.6 x
Average (Overall) 1,849 14.5 x 14.0 x
Median (Overall) 210 13.5 x 14.2 x
Source: S&P Capital IQ (10 February 2025); MCK
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 43
Appendix 4
EBITDA Multiples of Comparable Transactions
Target Acquirer Location Date
Transaction
Value ($m)
EV / LTM
EBITDA
EV / NTM
EBITDA
Millennium & Copthorne Related Transactions
Mayfair Luxury Hotels
Limited
Millennium & Copthorne
Hotels NZ Ltd
New Zealand 23/10/2024 32 n/a 15.0 x
Sofitel Brisbane Central
Hotel
Millennium & Copthorne
Hotels NZ Ltd; City
Developments Ltd
Australia 15/12/2023 191 n/a 17.9 x
Millennium & Copthorne
Hotels plc (35% share)
City Developments Ltd United
Kingdom
7/06/2019 1,484 16.5 x 16.2 x
Average
569 16.5 x 16.4 x
Median
191 16.5 x 16.2 x
Other Transactions
Eumundi Group SEQ Hospitality Group Australia 30/10/2024 117 13.7 x n/a
Hilton Boston Back Bay Certares Management;
Belcourt Capital Partners
United States 29/02/2024 281 10.2 x n/a
Amara Holdings (73%) Dymon Asia Private Equity Singapore 14/11/2023 710 19.0 x n/a
Alloggio Group Next Capital Australia 27/03/2023 115 10.8 x n/a
Sofitel Philadelphia Hotel Investor Group United States 3/08/2022 128 21.1 x n/a
easyHotel ICAMAP; Cadim Fonds United
Kingdom
5/08/2019 223 n/a 21.8 x
Radisson Hospitality (49%) Jinjiang International
Holdings
Belgium 11/12/2018 1,024 6.9 x 5.9 x
The Ritz-Carlton, Lake
Tahoe
Braemar Hotels & Resorts United States 13/11/2018 165 13.4 x n/a
Hilton Alexandria Old Town Ashford Hospitality Trust United States 26/06/2018 162 12.1 x n/a
NH Hotel Group (18%) Minor International Group Spain 6/06/2018 704 12.6 x 10.5 x
AccorInvest Group (58%) GIC; Colony NorthStar;
Crédit Agricole; Amundi
Luxembourg 27/02/2018 7,661 12.0 x n/a
Mantra Group AAPC Limited Australia 9/10/2017 1,502 13.0 x 11.6 x
Crowne Plaza Hotel Atlanta
at Ravinia
Hospitality Properties Trust United States 29/06/2017 121 15.3 x n/a
Park Hyatt Beaver Creek
Resort and Spa
Ashford Hospitality Prime
(Braemar Hotels & Resorts)
United States 10/03/2017 210 14.9 x n/a
Global Premium Hotels
(35%)
Investor Group Singapore 23/02/2017 152 29.0 x n/a
Hilton Garden Inn,
Chelsea, New York
Investor Group United States 14/07/2016 90 13.5 x n/a
Starwood Hotels & Resorts
Worldwide
Marriott International United States 16/11/2015 23,413 13.5 x 13.4 x
Jupiter Hotels Holdings Fico Holding; S Hotels and
Resorts
United
Kingdom
12/10/2015 353 13.8 x n/a
Average (Tier 2) 2, 063 14.4 x 12.6 x
Median (Tier 2) 217 13.5 x 11.6 x
Average (Overall) 1,849 14.5 x 14.0 x
Median (Overall) 210 13.5 x 14.2 x
Source: S&P Capital IQ (10 February 2025); MCK
APPENDIX: INDEPENDENT ADVISER’S REPORT
Millennium Hotel Queenstown Superior Twin Room and bathroom.
Support Office
Tel: (09) 353 5010
Level 7, 23 Customs Street East, Auckland 1010
PO Box 5640, Victoria Street West, Auckland 1142
National Conference Office
Tel: 0800 4 MEETINGS (0800 4 633 846)
Email: meetings@millenniumhotels.co.nz
www.meetingsnz.co.nz
Sales
Email: sales.marketing@millenniumhotels.co.nz
International Sales Tel: (09) 353 5085
Corporate Sales Auckland Tel: (09) 353 5010
Corporate Sales Wellington Tel: (04) 382 0770
Central Reservations
Ph: 0800 808 228
Email: central.res@millenniumhotels.co.nz
www.millenniumhotels.com
---
24 February 2025
Target Company Statement in response to CDLHH NZ takeover offer
Independent Director’s Recommendation: Do not accept the CDLHH NZ offer
The Independent Directors of Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited (MCK, the
Company, NZX: MCK) strongly recommend that shareholders DO NOT ACCEPT the takeover offer
(the Offer) made on 10 February 2025 by CDL Hotels Holdings New Zealand Limited (CDLHH NZ).
The Independent Directors believe the Offer price is too low and inadequate. In particular, the Offer
price of $2.25 per ordinary share is significantly below the Independent Adviser’s valuation range of
$4.40 to $5.00 per ordinary share, with a midpoint of $4.70.
The reasons for the Independent Directors’ recommendation to not accept the Offer are set out in
full in the Target Company Statement which accompanies this announcement and is being sent to
holders of ordinary shares today. The Target Company Statement also incorporates the
Independent Adviser’s Report prepared by Northington Partners Limited (Independent Adviser).
Chair of the Independent Directors Committee, Leslie Preston, said: “Our core focus is to deliver
value to all MCK shareholders, and we want all of our shareholders to benefit from the future value
we believe is available through MCK. We believe that if the major shareholder wishes to acquire all
of MCK, it should pay an appropriate price.
“The Independent Directors are firmly of the view that CDLHH NZ’s current Offer is too low and is
inadequate - the current Offer price of $2.25 per ordinary share is significantly below the bottom of
the Independent Adviser’s range of $4.40 per ordinary share and it does not adequately reflect the
market value of MCK’s hotel and property assets or the recent investments made into
refurbishments, upgrades and acquisitions. Additionally, the Offer undervalues the benefits which
can be expected as the tourism and property markets recover.
“We recommend shareholders do not accept the current offer. To do this, shareholders should
simply disregard the Offer documents sent by CDLHH NZ and take no action.”
The Independent Adviser has concluded that: “the mid-point value of our assessed value range ($4.70
per share) is more than double the Offer Price of $2.25. Even allowing for a reasonable margin of error
in relation to our valuation, we conclude that the Offer significantly undervalues the Company
.”
Holders of ordinary shares should read the Target Company Statement (including the Independent
Adviser’s Report) carefully and in full before deciding what action to take in response to CDLHH NZ’s
offer. The Offer must remain open until at least 5.00pm NZT on 8 May 2025. There is no benefit to
shareholders in accepting the Offer early. Shareholders are encouraged to seek professional
investment and/or legal advice if they have any questions in respect of the offer.
ENDS
Issued by Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited
For shareholder enquiries about the Offer, please email: enquiries@mckhotels.co.nz
For other investor relations enquiries, please contact Stuart Harrison, Managing Director, t: +64 21 869 216
e: stuart.harrison@millenniumhotels.com
For media enquiries please contact: Jackie Ellis, t: +64 27 2462505 e: jackie@ellisandco.co.nz
About Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited
Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited (NZX:MCK) is the only NZSX listed hotel owner-operator with 19
owned/leased/franchised hotels based in New Zealand under the Millennium, Grand Millennium, M Social,
Copthorne and Kingsgate brands. As part of the Millennium & Copthorne Hotels group, we are proud to be part of a
global network of over 120 properties in gateway cities across Asia, Europe, North America, the Middle East and New
Zealand. MCK also has property interests in Australia through its Kingsgate Group subsidiaries including a 50%
ownership interest in the Sofitel Hotel Brisbane Central through a joint venture. MCK is the majority shareholder in
land developer CDL Investments New Zealand Limited (NZX:CDI).
For more information, visit our website: www.millenniumhotels.co.nz
Data sourced from publicly available filings. Our datasets may not be complete. Automated analysis can produce errors. If you believe any data on this page is incorrect, please contact us at hello@nzxplorer.co.nz. For informational purposes only. Not investment advice.