Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited logo

MCK Target Company Statement

M&A23 February 2025MCKConsumer Discretionary

24 February 2025
in response to a full takeover offer by

CDL Hotels Holdings New Zealand Limited

You should read this Target Company Statement in its entirety, including the Independent Adviser’s

Report from Northington Partners Limited, carefully and in full when considering whether to accept

the Offer. This is an important document and requires your urgent attention. If you have any questions

in respect of this document or the Offer, you should seek advice from your financial or legal adviser.

TARGET COMPANY

STATEMENT

2MILLENNIUM & COPTHORNE HOTELS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED | TARGET COMPANY STATEMENT 2025

3
CONTENTS

Letter from the Chair of

the Independent Directors 5

Section 1: Independent Directors’ Recommendation 11

Section 2: Takeovers Code Disclosures 19

Schedules 1–5 33

Appendix: Independent Adviser’s Report 41

Cover Image: M Social Auckland 196/200 Quay Street, Auckland CBD.

Left: Beast & Butterflies Restaurant inside M Social Auckland.

CONTENTS

4MILLENNIUM & COPTHORNE HOTELS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED | TARGET COMPANY STATEMENT 2025

55
LETTER FROM

THE CHAIR OF

THE INDEPENDENT

DIRECTORS

LETTER FROM THE CHAIR OF THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS

Left: The bar at Beast & Butterflies Restaurant, M Social Auckland.

6MILLENNIUM & COPTHORNE HOTELS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED | TARGET COMPANY STATEMENT 2025
24 February 2025

Dear Shareholder,

The Independent Directors of MCK

strongly recommend shareholders

DO NOT ACCEPT the Offer. You should

ignore the Offer documents sent to you

by CDLHH NZ and TAKE NO ACTION.

You will have recently received a Takeover Offer

from CDL Hotels Holdings New Zealand Limited

(CDLHH NZ) to acquire all of your ordinary shares

(Ordinary Shares) in Millennium & Copthorne

Hotels New Zealand Limited (MCK) for $2.25 per

Ordinary Share (the Offer). CDLHH NZ is an indirect

wholly owned subsidiary of Singapore Exchange-

listed City Developments Limited (CDL Group).

CDLHH NZ currently owns 75.86% of the Ordinary

Shares and 91.34% of the redeemable non-voting

preference shares (Preference Shares) in MCK. The

Offer is for CDLHH NZ to acquire all the remaining

Ordinary Shares that it does not currently own.

MCK’s response to the Offer has been managed

by the committee of Independent Directors of the

MCK Board (the Independent Committee),

comprising Leslie Preston (Independent Committee

Chair), Colin Sim and Graham McKenzie. The

Independent Directors do not own any Ordinary

Shares or Preference Shares in MCK.

The two MCK directors who are associated with

CDLHH NZ, Kevin Hangchi and Eik Sheng Kwek, do not

sit on the Independent Committee because they have

a conflict of interest. In addition, MCK’s Managing

Director (Stuart Harrison) also does not sit on the

Independent Committee because he has a potential

conflict of interest due to his executive role with MCK.

The Independent Committee has sought advice

from Cameron Partners Limited (Cameron

Partners) as financial adviser and Bell Gully as legal

adviser, and carefully considered the report from

the Independent Adviser, Northington Partners

Limited (Northington or the Independent Adviser),

in assessing the merits of the Offer and making its

recommendation to shareholders.

Reasons NOT TO ACCEPT the Offer

The Offer of $2.25 per Ordinary Share is significantly

below the Independent Adviser’s valuation range of

$4.40 to $5.00 per Ordinary Share (with the midpoint

of the Independent Adviser’s valuation range

being $4.70 per Ordinary Share). The Independent

Adviser concludes that “the mid-point value of our

assessed value range ($4.70 per share) is more

than double the Offer Price of $2.25. Even allowing

for a reasonable margin of error in relation to our

valuation, we conclude that the Offer significantly

undervalues the Company.”

The Independent Adviser’s Report is set out in the

Appendix to this Target Company Statement. The

Independent Committee strongly encourages all

holders of Ordinary Shares to read the full Target

Company Statement (including the Independent

Adviser’s Report).

The primary reasons why the Independent Directors

believe you should NOT ACCEPT the Offer are:

1. The Offer price of $2.25 per Ordinary Share

is significantly below the Independent

Adviser’s assessment of value for the

Ordinary Shares. The Independent Adviser

has assessed a value range of $4.40 to

$5.00 per Ordinary Share, with a midpoint

of $4.70 per Ordinary Share.

2. The timing of the Offer significantly

discounts the benefits to the Company that

shareholders can expect as the hotel and

property markets recover. MCK remains

confident in its outlook and its ability to

continue to make progress under its Revive

and Thrive Strategy. The Independent

Directors believe that MCK is well positioned

to benefit from a recovery in the tourism and

property markets.

LETTER FROM THE CHAIR OF

THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS

7
3. The Offer undervalues recent capital

expenditure on key hotels. Over the last

three financial years, MCK has invested

approximately $59.0 million of capital

expenditure on a number of hotels, the

majority of which was spent on major

refurbishments to the Millennium Hotel

Queenstown, the Millennium Hotel Rotorua,

the Copthorne Hotel & Resort Bay of Islands

and the Copthorne Hotel Palmerston North.

The Independent Directors believe that

the expected benefits from this capital

expenditure are yet to be fully reflected in

MCK’s operating results.

4. The Offer is at a material discount to the

market value of MCK’s net assets and

significantly undervalues the $129.5

million of recent acquisitions made by

MCK. These assets were acquired at market

values, with the acquisitions supported

at the MCK Board by the two CDLHH NZ

representative directors. MCK has recently

acquired 50% of Sofitel Brisbane Central

for $95.4 million (December 2023), hotel

development land in Whangarei for $2.2

million (August 2024), and The Mayfair Hotel

Christchurch for $31.9 million (January

2025). Despite CDLHH NZ’s support for MCK

to acquire these assets at market values,

the Offer is at a material discount to MCK’s

internally assessed market value of its net

assets of $5.39 per Ordinary Share.

1

5. The Offer does not value the benefits that

could be captured by CDLHH NZ. There are

benefits available to CDLHH NZ from acquiring

all of the Ordinary Shares. These strategic

benefits include the potential redemption of

the Preference Shares at a price below the

Offer price for the Ordinary Shares, complete

control of MCK’s business if MCK ceases to be

listed on NZX, and potential cost synergies.

Further details are set out in Section 1 of this Target

Company Statement.

Offer conditions

The Offer is conditional on (among other matters)

CDLHH NZ receiving acceptances in relation to the

Ordinary Shares, which when taken together with

the Ordinary Shares that it already holds or controls,

confer on CDLHH NZ 90% or more of the voting rights

in MCK. Should CDLHH NZ reach this threshold, it may

compulsorily acquire all of the remaining Ordinary

Shares in MCK. CDLHH NZ is entitled to waive this

condition, in which case (if all other conditions have

been satisfied or, if capable of waiver, waived) it could

take up all acceptances of the Offer received.

The Offer is also conditional on (among other

matters) CDLHH NZ receiving approval under the

Overseas Investment Act. This may take some time.

Furthermore, CDLHH NZ has included as a condition

of its Offer, that MCK may not pay or declare any

dividend during the period from (and including)

20 January 2025 (being the date on which CDLHH

NZ gave its Takeover Notice) until the date on

which the Offer is declared unconditional or

lapses. This means that shareholders will not

receive a final dividend for FY24 (unless the Offer

lapses and the Board subsequently decides to

pay a dividend in respect of FY24). In the last two

financial years, MCK paid a final dividend of 3.0

cents per Ordinary Share in May 2023 and in May

2024. If the Offer is successful, shareholders will

not receive any final dividend in respect of FY24.

Timing

The Offer must remain open until at least 5.00pm

NZT on 8 May 2025. CDLHH NZ may elect to

extend the Offer beyond this date to 7 July 2025

(in the latest permitted circumstances).

If you accept the Offer, your decision is irrevocable

and cannot be withdrawn. There is no benefit

to accepting the Offer early and prior to the

satisfaction of all of the conditions. If you accept

the Offer early, you will not be paid until all

conditions have been met, satisfied or waived.

LETTER FROM THE CHAIR OF THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS

LETTER FROM THE CHAIR OF THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS

1. Per Investor Presentation for FY24 results.

8MILLENNIUM & COPTHORNE HOTELS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED | TARGET COMPANY STATEMENT 2025
MCK has more than 1,300 holders of Ordinary

Shares

2

and as at 20 February 2025 (being the

latest practicable date before the date of this

Target Company Statement), CDLHH NZ had not

announced that it had received acceptances of

the Offer in respect of an additional 1% or more

of the Ordinary Shares.

Preference Shares

MCK also has redeemable non-voting preference

shares listed on the NZX Main Board under the ticker

‘MCKPA’ (Preference Shares). CDLHH NZ owns 91.34%

of the Preference Shares. Although the Preference

Shares rank equally with the Ordinary Shares with

respect to all distributions made by MCK (subject to

a liquidation preference) they do not (and are not

required under the Takeovers Code to) form part of

the Offer. However, independently of the Offer, CDLHH

NZ has indicated that it is willing to acquire the

Preference Shares at $1.70 per share via its broker,

Craigs Investment Partners Limited, through buying

on the NZX Main Board (the RPS Offer).

CDLHH NZ has stated that it may also elect to seek to

have the Preference Shares issued by MCK redeemed,

if CDLHH NZ is successful in acquiring all of the

outstanding Ordinary Shares. Preference Shares can

be redeemed by MCK at any time if the redemption is

approved by holders of Preference Shares by way of

special resolution. CDLHH NZ has sufficient votes to

pass such a special resolution. The redemption price

for each Preference Share would be the higher of their

20-day volume weighted average price or their issue

price of $0.64.

Historically, the Preference Shares have traded broadly

in line with the Ordinary Shares (reflecting essentially

the same economic rights). However, the Ordinary

Shares traded at $2.40 and the Preference Shares

traded at $1.80 per share on Thursday, 20 February

2025, being the last practicable trading day prior to

the release of this Target Company Statement. To the

extent the Preference Shares were redeemed for a

price below the Offer price for the Ordinary Shares,

it would increase the value of the Ordinary Shares.

CDLHH NZ is suggesting this could happen

in the event its Offer is successful.

The Independent Directors make no recommendation

in respect of the RPS Offer. The Takeovers Code does

not apply to the RPS Offer and this Target Company

Statement does not include information about the

RPS Offer. Shareholders who are considering selling

their Preference Shares as part of the RPS Offer

or otherwise are recommended to seek their own

professional advice.

In assessing the Offer for Ordinary Shares, MCK

shareholders who also own Preference Shares may

wish to consider the implications for their Preference

Shares (including their potential redemption) if the

Offer is successful.

Summary

MCK offers its shareholders a unique investment

opportunity as the only hotels and property group

listed on the NZX.

Our core focus is to deliver value to all MCK

shareholders, and we want all of our shareholders to

benefit from the future value we believe is available

through MCK. We believe that if the major shareholder

wishes to acquire all of MCK, it should pay an

appropriate price. The Independent Directors are

firmly of the view that CDLHH NZ’s current Offer

is too low and is inadequate.

This document sets out your Independent Director’s

formal response to the Offer, including reasons

why we believe you should NOT accept the Offer.

However, the decision whether or not to accept the

Offer is an individual decision. The Independent

Directors recommend you read the Target Company

Statement carefully and in full, including the

Independent Adviser’s Report, before making a

decision (including the Independent Adviser’s

assessment of the merits of the Offer on pages 5, 6,

36 and 37 of the Independent Adviser’s Report).

LETTER FROM THE CHAIR OF

THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS

(CONTINUED)

2. As at 13 February 2025.

9LETTER FROM THE CHAIR OF THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS
LETTER FROM THE CHAIR OF THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS

If you have any queries in relation to the Offer,

please email enquiries@mckhotels.co.nz. If you are

in any doubt how to respond to the Offer, please

seek financial advice from an independent, qualified

adviser in relation to your particular circumstances.

Your Independent Directors will continue to keep you

updated on all material developments in relation to

the Offer. Announcements are available on the NZX

website (www.nzx.com/companies/MCK) and the MCK

website (https://mckhotels.co.nz/investors/).

Yours sincerely,

Leslie Preston

Chair of the Independent Directors Committee of MCK

10MILLENNIUM & COPTHORNE HOTELS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED | TARGET COMPANY STATEMENT 2025

1111
SEC TION 1:

INDEPENDENT

DIRECTORS’

RECOMMENDATION

SECTION 1: INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS’ RECOMMENDATION

Left: The newly refurbished reception

area at Millennium Hotel Queenstown.

12MILLENNIUM & COPTHORNE HOTELS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED | TARGET COMPANY STATEMENT 2025
The Independent Directors unanimously recommend

that you DO NOT ACCEPT the Offer from CDLHH NZ in

respect of your Ordinary Shares in MCK.

The Independent Directors did not encourage or

solicit CDLHH NZ’s Offer.

The primary reasons for the Independent Director’s

DO NOT ACCEPT recommendation are set out below

and discussed throughout this Section:

1. The Offer price of $2.25 per Ordinary Share

is significantly below the Independent

Adviser’s assessment of value for the

Ordinary Shares. The Independent Adviser

has assessed a value range of $4.40 to

$5.00 per Ordinary Share, with a midpoint

of $4.70 per Ordinary Share.

2. The timing of the Offer significantly

discounts the benefits to the Company

that shareholders can expect as the hotel

and property markets recover.

3. The Offer undervalues recent capital

expenditure on key hotels.

4. The Offer is at a material discount to the

market value of MCK’s net assets and

significantly undervalues the $129.5

million of recent acquisitions made

by MCK. These assets were acquired at

market values, with the acquisitions

supported at the MCK Board by the two

CDLHH NZ representative directors.

5. The Offer does not value the benefits

that could be captured by CDLHH NZ.

Further details are set out on the following pages.

The Independent Directors strongly encourage

you to take these factors into account, together

with the assessment of the Independent Adviser

as to the merits of the Offer, when considering

your response to CDLHH NZ’s Offer. The Independent

Adviser’s assessment of the merits of the Offer is

set out on pages 5, 6, 36 and 37 of the Independent

Adviser’s Report.

The Independent Adviser’s Report is set out in the

Appendix to this Target Company Statement.

Please read the Target Company Statement carefully

and in full when considering whether or not to accept

the Offer. The decision whether or not to accept

the Offer is an individual decision. If you have any

questions in respect of this document or the Offer,

you should seek financial advice from an independent,

qualified adviser.

1. The Offer price of $2.25 per Ordinary

Share is significantly below the

Independent Adviser’s assessment of value

for the Ordinary Shares. The Independent

Adviser has assessed a value range of

$4.40 to $5.00 per Ordinary Share, with

a midpoint of $4.70 per Ordinary Share

Northington Partners Limited (Northington or the

Independent Adviser) was engaged to prepare an

Independent Adviser’s Report to assess the merits

of the Offer for holders of the Ordinary Shares.

Northington’s independent report is attached in full

in the Appendix to this Target Company Statement.

Northington states that the “mid-point value of

our assessed range ($4.70 per share) is more

than double the Offer Price of $2.25. Even

allowing for a reasonable margin of error in

relation to our valuation, we conclude that the

Offer significantly undervalues the Company.”

The Independent Adviser’s Report confirms the

view of the Independent Directors that the Offer

is too low and is inadequate.

Comparison of Offer Price to Assessed Value

The Independent Adviser has assessed a valuation

range of $4.40 to $5.00 per Ordinary Share,

with a mid-point of $4.70 per Ordinary Share.

This is significantly higher than the Offer Price

of $2.25 per Ordinary Share. The Offer price

represents a material discount to the mid-point

of the Independent Adviser’s valuation range

as illustrated in the chart following.

SECTION 1: INDEPENDENT

DIRECTORS’ RECOMMENDATION

13
The Independent Adviser notes that its value

range for MCK of $4.40 to $5.00 per Ordinary

Share compares to MCK’s reported book value

per Ordinary Share of $3.46 as of 31 December

2024. The book value reflects the carrying value

for MCK’s assets, which are recorded at cost less

accumulated depreciation and impairment losses.

If MCK’s properties were reported at market value

(as was MCK’s accounting policy prior to FY21), the

Independent Adviser’s assessment of the adjusted

net asset value per Ordinary Share is $5.71 as of

31 December 2024 (prior to tax considerations).

Predominantly allowing for the implied deferred

tax on the market revaluations (and, to a lesser

extent, capital gains tax on the Sydney Apartments

value), MCK’s internally assessed market value of

its net assets is $5.39 per share.

The Independent Adviser states its value range

therefore represents a discount to its market value

adjusted net asset value per Ordinary Share of 13%

to 23% (or a 7% to 18% discount to MCK’s reported

adjusted net asset value of $5.39) and that this

discount largely reflects company overheads which

are reported in the Independent Adviser’s valuation

framework but not incorporated into the property

market valuations.

Valuation Approach

Based on the unique characteristics of MCK’s hotel

and property investments, the Independent Adviser

has assessed MCK’s value on a component “sum-

of-the-parts” basis both as a going concern (Going

Concern Value) and under an orderly realisation of

assets through the sale of its hotel, residential and

investment properties (Wind-Up Value).

The Independent Adviser states in the Independent

Adviser’s Report that it has assumed for the purposes

of the Going Concern Value and the Wind-Up Value

that the number of MCK shares on issue is the fully

diluted number of both the Ordinary Shares and the

Preference Shares. Therefore, MCK’s Ordinary Shares

and Preference Shares were valued equally by the

Independent Adviser. To the extent MCK’s Preference

Shares were redeemed for a price below $4.70 per

share (being the mid-point of the assessed valuation

range), the Independent Adviser’s valuation range for

Ordinary Shares would increase.

The Independent Adviser also notes in the

Independent Adviser’s Report that although the Offer

price represents a premium of 29.0% to the 20-day

VWAP of MCK’s Ordinary Shares ($1.75) prior to

CDLHH NZ’s announcement of its intention to make

an offer (on 20 January 2025), Northington suggests

that MCK’s share price is of limited relevance in this

instance. This is because the observed NZX prices

relate to trades for small parcels of shares and reflect

that MCK shares are very illiquid. The Independent

Adviser suggests that the low price (relative to its

assessed value) may also reflect that CDLHH NZ

has control of MCK and is pursuing a strategy which

favours long-term capital appreciation over cash

distributions in the short term.

Consequences for Minority Shareholders

if the Offer is Not Successful

The Independent Adviser discusses the

consequences for minority shareholders if

the Offer is not successful on pages 6, 36

and 37 of the Independent Adviser’s Report.

SECTION 1: INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS’ RECOMMENDATION

SECTION 1: INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS’ RECOMMENDATION

$6.00

$5.00

$4.00

$3.00

$2.00

$1.00

Offer PriceIndependent

Adviser’s valuation

range: Low

Mid-point $4.70

$2.25

$4.40

$5.00

Independent

Adviser’s valuation

range: High

14MILLENNIUM & COPTHORNE HOTELS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED | TARGET COMPANY STATEMENT 2025
The Independent Adviser states that if the Offer

conditions are not fully satisfied or waived by CDLHH

NZ, the Offer will lapse and MCK will continue to

operate in its current form. It assesses that MCK

shares are likely to continue to trade at a significant

discount to the Independent Adviser’s assessed value

range because of the lack of liquidity and ongoing

minority discount attributed to small share parcels.

The Independent Adviser states that if the Offer

is unsuccessful, it believes that CDLHH NZ will

remain motivated to reach the 90% ownership

level needed to utilise the compulsory acquisition

provisions of the Takeovers Code. One of those

options is to make a further takeover offer at a

higher price (or to increase the price for the current

Offer in accordance with the Takeovers Code).

The Independent Adviser says that in its view

the likelihood of an alternative takeover offer

emerging for MCK from a party other than CDLHH

NZ is extremely low. As CDLHH NZ already controls

75.9% of the voting rights in MCK, any alternative

takeover offer would require CDLHH NZ’s support.

The Independent Adviser also states that while the

Offer price of $2.25 per Ordinary Share is considerably

lower than the assessed value range of $4.40 to $5.00

per Ordinary Share, some shareholders may see the

Offer as an opportunity to exit their investment in

MCK at a known price (without brokerage costs). It

notes that Ordinary Shares are highly illiquid and, in

its view, will remain so if the Offer is unsuccessful.

Given the uncertainties relating to the share price and

the market liquidity after the Offer has closed, the

Independent Adviser notes that some shareholders

may accept a price lower than the perceived value

of the Ordinary Shares in return for a certain exit.

However, the Independent Directors are firmly

of the view that the current Offer price is too

low and, even if you do wish to accept the Offer,

there is no benefit to accepting the Offer early.

2. The timing of the Offer significantly

discounts the benefits to the Company

that shareholders can expect as the

hotel and property markets recover

MCK’s results for the year ending 31 December 2024

recorded consolidated group revenue of $176.2

million (2023: $145.7 million), group operating

profit before tax and non-controlling interests of

$47.1 million (2023: $37.5 million) and earnings

per share of 17.17 cents

3

(2023: 13.65 cents). MCK

remains confident in its outlook and of its ability

to continue to make progress under its Revive

and Thrive Strategy. The Independent Directors

believe that MCK is well positioned to benefit from

a recovery in the tourism and property markets.

During 2024, MCK experienced a strong turnaround

in its hotels business but it has still not yet fully

recovered from the impact of the COVID pandemic

on the tourism market:

• New Zealand hotel revenue grew 8.3% to $109.5

million in 2024 ($101.1 million in 2023).

• Hotel occupancy improved during 2024 but has

still not recovered to pre-COVID levels. From

2023 to 2024, MCK’s occupancy improved from

61% to 66% across its New Zealand hotels and

further improvement has been evidenced in

January and during February 2025. However,

occupancy still remains below 2019 levels (81%).

• 2024 New Zealand hotel revenue was 13.5% below

2019 and EBITDA was 53.5% lower than 2019.

• MCK strategically focuses on the international

visitor markets. In 2019, international visitors

accounted for 54% of all occupancy in New

Zealand hotels.

• International visitor arrivals are expected to

return to pre-COVID levels by Q1 2027.

4

• The ongoing recovery of New Zealand’s tourism

sector is expected to drive earnings growth within

MCK’s hotel business in 2025 and beyond.

SECTION 1: INDEPENDENT

DIRECTORS’ RECOMMENDATION

(CONTINUED)

3. Adjusted for one-off deferred tax adjustment, made as

a result of government legislation change.

4. TECNZ International Arrivals Forecast January 2025, Westpac.

15
• The Sofitel Brisbane Central had a soft first

quarter, but saw solid demand across its core

segments as 2024 progressed.

The below charts illustrate the ongoing recovery

in New Zealand’s tourism sector and MCK’s hotel

occupancy, revenue and earnings.

The Independent Directors believe that the property

markets are expected to begin to recover as interest

rates fall and economies improve:

• The market value of CDL Investments New Zealand

Limited (CDI), MCK’s 65% subsidiary, is currently

impacted by weakness in the property market.

As the property market begins to stabilise and

potentially improve (see the forecasts in the

below chart), the market value of CDI’s assets and

the profitability of its developments would likely

increase; and

• improvements in the property market more

generally would also lift the market valuations

for CDI’s tenanted industrial property and

MCK’s other property assets (hotels, Sydney

apartments, vacant surplus land).

SECTION 1: INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS’ RECOMMENDATION

5. Statistics New Zealand Visitor Arrivals.

6. RBNZ February 2025 Monetary Policy Statement.

FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24

43.4

14.6

22.9

4.8

19.3

17.4

New Zealand hotel EBITDA ($m)

FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24

126.6

64.1

55.2

65.2

101.1

109.5

New Zealand hotel revenue ($m)

Jan 20

Jan 21

Jan 22

Jan 23

Jan 24

Apr 20

Apr 21

Apr 22

Apr 23

Apr 24

Jul 20

Jul 21

Jul 22

Jul 23

Jul 24

Oct 20

Oct 21

Oct 22

Oct 23

Oct 24

Occupancy

International

Arrivals

International visitor numbers to New Zealand

and MCK’s New Zealand hotel occupancy

5

SECTION 1: INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS’ RECOMMENDATION

Dec 20Dec 21Dec 22Dec 23Dec 24Dec 25Dec 26Dec 27

4,000

3,500

3,000

2,500

2,000

Actual

Forecast

CoreLogic’s New Zealand house price index

6

16MILLENNIUM & COPTHORNE HOTELS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED | TARGET COMPANY STATEMENT 2025
SECTION 1: INDEPENDENT

DIRECTORS’ RECOMMENDATION

(CONTINUED)

3. The Offer undervalues recent

capital expenditure on key hotels

MCK is partially through a significant

refurbishment and upgrade of hotel properties.

This programme commenced in 2022 and

is expected to be completed in 2025.

Over the last three years, MCK has allocated

approximately $59.0 million of capital expenditure

on a number of hotels, the majority of which was

spent on major refurbishments and upgrades to:

• Millennium Hotel Queenstown;

• Millennium Hotel Rotorua;

• Copthorne Hotel & Resort Bay of Islands; and

• Copthorne Hotel Palmerston North.

Recently completed refurbishments and upgrades

are expected to lift average daily room rates and

earnings. Over 390 rooms have been refurbished

in the last three years and over 140 additional

rooms are due to be completed in FY25. In total,

this represents over 30% of MCK’s 1,720 owned

New Zealand hotel rooms (excluding The Mayfair

Hotel Christchurch). The Independent Directors

believe that the expected benefits to revenue and

earnings from this recent capital expenditure has

yet to be fully reflected in MCK’s operating results.

The Independent Directors believe that the Offer

undervalues the capital expenditure investment

made to date, and being completed, by MCK.

4. The Offer is at a material discount to

the market value of MCK’s net assets

and significantly undervalues the $129.5

million of recent acquisitions made by

MCK. These assets were acquired at

market values, with the acquisitions

supported at the MCK Board by the two

CDLHH NZ representative directors

Strategic acquisitions are a key component of the

growth strategy for MCK and its subsidiaries. As the

controlling shareholder, CDLHH NZ has supported this

strategy and MCK’s recent investments.

MCK has invested $129.5 million on hotel acquisitions

in the past two years comprising:

• $31.9 million for The Mayfair Hotel Christchurch

in January 2025;

• $2.2 million for development land in Whangarei

in August 2024; and

• $95.4 million for 50% of Sofitel Brisbane

Central in December 2023. The remaining 50%

was acquired by a subsidiary of CDL Group.

By supporting recent investments and acquisitions,

CDLHH NZ has indicated that it is willing to pay

market value for hotel and property assets.

Furthermore, CDL Group partnered with MCK in

acquiring Sofitel Brisbane Central.

MCK’s internally assessed market value of its net

assets implies a price of $5.39 per share.

7

Despite

a willingness to acquire assets at market value,

CDLHH NZ’s Offer for MCK of $2.25 per Ordinary

Share is at a material discount to the net market

value of MCK’s assets and appears to significantly

undervalue MCK’s recently acquired properties.

5. The Offer does not value the benefits

that could be captured by CDLHH NZ

MCK’s Independent Directors believe that there

are potentially significant benefits available to

CDLHH NZ from fully acquiring MCK. These strategic

benefits include:

• The potential redemption of Preference Shares;

• Complete control of MCK’s business if MCK ceases

to be listed on NZX; and

• Potential cost synergies.

The above strategic benefits are discussed below.

If the Offer is successful, these strategic benefits

could be captured by CDLHH NZ and its shareholders,

with no value benefit for the other holders of the

Ordinary Shares. Given the significant strategic

value in CDLHH NZ having full ownership of MCK,

the Independent Directors believe that the other

holders of the Ordinary Shares should share in a

proportion of these benefits as part of the Offer.

17SECTION 1: INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS’ RECOMMENDATION
The potential redemption of Preference Shares

MCK’s Preference Shares are listed on the NZX Main

Board under the ticker ‘MCKPA’. CDLHH NZ owns

91.34% of the Preference Shares. Although the

Preference Shares rank equally with the Ordinary

Shares with respect to all distributions made by

MCK (subject to a liquidation preference) they do

not (and are not required under the Takeovers Code

to) form part of the Offer. However, independently

of the Offer, CDLHH NZ has indicated that it is willing

to acquire the Preference Shares at $1.70 per share

via its broker, Craigs Investment Partners Limited,

through buying on the NZX Main Board.

CDLHH NZ has stated that it may also elect to seek to

have the Preference Shares issued by MCK redeemed,

if CDLHH NZ is successful in acquiring all of the

outstanding Ordinary Shares. Preference Shares can

be redeemed by MCK at any time if the redemption is

approved by holders of Preference Shares by way of

special resolution. CDLHH NZ has sufficient votes to

pass such a special resolution. The redemption price

for each Preference Share would be the higher of their

20-day volume weighted average price or $0.64.

Historically, the Preference Shares have traded

broadly in line with the Ordinary Shares (reflecting

essentially the same economic rights).

8

However,

the Ordinary Shares traded at $2.40 and the

Preference Shares traded at $1.80 per share

on Thursday, 20 February 2025, being the last

practicable trading day prior to the release of

this Target Company Statement. To the extent the

Preference Shares were redeemed for a price below

the Offer Price for the Ordinary Shares, it would

increase the value of the Ordinary Shares.

The Independent Directors make no recommendation

in respect of the RPS Offer. The Takeovers Code does

not apply to the RPS Offer and this Target Company

Statement does not include information about the

RPS Offer. Shareholders who are considering selling

their Preference Shares as part of the RPS Offer

or otherwise are recommended to seek their own

professional advice.

In assessing the Offer for Ordinary Shares, MCK

shareholders who also own Preference Shares

may wish to consider the implications for their

Preference Shares (including their potential

redemption) if the Offer is successful.

Complete control of MCK’s capital structure

and business

MCK currently has a robust balance sheet with

debt headroom and the ability to raise equity

from shareholders. Although CDLHH NZ effectively

currently controls MCK’s capital structure, there are

some constraints upon CDLHH NZ due to MCK being

listed and the presence of minority shareholders.

Fully acquiring all of the shares in MCK would provide

CDLHH NZ with complete control of MCK’s capital

structure and business, which offers strategic

benefits and optionality to further accelerate MCK’s

growth through acquisitions and investment.

Fully acquiring all of the shares in MCK would provide

CDL Group direct control of CDI and full ownership of

Sofitel Brisbane Central. This could provide strategic

benefits for CDL Group.

Potential cost synergies

Cost synergies are potentially available to CDLHH

NZ from fully acquiring all of the shares in MCK.

The Independent Adviser has not separately valued

the likely benefits that CDLHH NZ could capture.

Cost synergies are likely to include avoiding costs

associated with being a listed entity and potential

efficiency improvements from full integration into

CDL Group.

SECTION 1: INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS’ RECOMMENDATION

7. Per Investor Presentation for FY24 results.

8. See pages 27 and 28 of the Independent Adviser’s Report.

18MILLENNIUM & COPTHORNE HOTELS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED | TARGET COMPANY STATEMENT 2025

1919
SECTION 2:

TAKEOVERS CODE

DISCLOSURES

SECTION 2: TAKEOVERS CODE DISCLOSURES

Left: A friendly greeting from our Social Team at M Social Auckland

20MILLENNIUM & COPTHORNE HOTELS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED | TARGET COMPANY STATEMENT 2025
SECTION 2: TAKEOVERS

CODE DISCLOSURES

1. Date

This target company statement (the

Target Company Statement) is dated

24 February 2025.

2. Offer

2.1 This Target Company Statement relates to a

full takeover offer (the Offer) by CDL Hotels

Holdings New Zealand Limited (CDLHH NZ)

to purchase all of the ordinary shares (the

Ordinary Shares) in Millennium & Copthorne

Hotels New Zealand Limited (MCK) that it

does not already own for a purchase price of

$2.25 per Ordinary Share, payable in cash.

2.2 The terms of the Offer are set out in an

offer document dated 10 February 2025

(the Offer Document), a copy of which was

sent to holders of Ordinary Shares on 10

February 2025.

2.3 MCK also has redeemable non-voting

preference shares listed on the NZX Main

Board under the ticker ‘MCKPA’ (Preference

Shares). The Preference Shares do not form

part of the Offer because they are not equity

securities for the purposes of the Takeovers

Code. However, independently of the Offer,

CDLHH NZ has indicated in the Offer Document

that it is willing to acquire the Preference

Shares at $1.70 per share via its broker, Craigs

Investment Partners Limited, through buying

on the NZX Main Board (the RPS Offer). In its

Offer Document, CDLHH NZ states that it may

also elect seek to have the Preference Shares

redeemed if it is successful in acquiring all of

the outstanding Ordinary Shares.

2.4 The Independent Directors make no

recommendation in respect of the RPS Offer.

The Takeovers Code does not apply to the RPS

Offer and this Target Company Statement does

not include information about the RPS Offer.

Shareholders who are considering selling their

Preference Shares as part of the RPS Offer or

otherwise are recommended to seek their own

professional advice.

3. Target Company

(a) The name of the target company

is Millennium & Copthorne Hotels

New Zealand Limited (NZX: MCK).

(b) The postal address of MCK is Floor 7,

23 Customs Street East, Auckland

Central, Auckland, 1010, New Zealand.

(c) MCK’s investor website is

https://mckhotels.co.nz/investors/.

(d) The contact email address for MCK

is enquiries@mckhotels.co.nz.

4. Directors of MCK

The directors of MCK are:

(a) Colin Sim

(Chair and Independent Director);

(b) Leslie Sue Preston

(Independent Director and Chair of

Independent Directors’ Committee

formed to consider the Offer);

(c) Graham Andrew McKenzie

(Independent Director);

(d) Kevin Hangchi

(Non-Executive Director);

(e) Eik Sheng Kwek

(Non-Executive Director); and

(f) Stuart Nigel Bruce Harrison

(Managing Director).

5. Ownership of MCK’s equity securities

5.1 The only class of equity securities on issue

in MCK is the Ordinary Shares.

5.2 MCK also has Preference Shares on issue.

However, these are not equity securities

for the purposes of the Takeovers Code.

Accordingly, all references to “equity

securities” throughout this Target Company

Statement refers only to the Ordinary Shares,

unless otherwise specified.

21
5.3 Schedule 1 to this Target Company Statement

sets out the number and the percentage of

Ordinary Shares held or controlled by each

director or senior manager

9

of MCK (a Director

or Senior Manager, respectively) and their

associates. Because Directors Eik Sheng

Kwek and Kevin Hangchi are associated with

CDLHH NZ, Schedule 1 includes the Ordinary

Shares held by CDLHH NZ. Except as set out in

Schedule 1 to this Target Company Statement,

no Director or Senior Manager in MCK or

their associates holds or controls any equity

securities of MCK.

5.4 To the knowledge of MCK, no other person

(other than the Directors, Senior Managers

or their associates, to the extent set out in

Schedule 1) holds or controls 5% or more

of any class of equity securities of MCK.

In particular, details of the shareholdings

held or controlled by CDLHH NZ and City

Developments Limited (being the only

persons who hold or control 5% or more of

the Ordinary Shares) are set out in Schedule 1.

5.5 No equity securities have, during the

two-year period ending on the date of this

Target Company Statement, been issued

to the Directors and Senior Managers or

their associates.

5.6 No Director or Senior Manager, or an associate

of a Director or Senior Manager, has obtained

a beneficial interest under any employee share

scheme or other remuneration arrangement

during the two-year period ending on the date

of this Target Company Statement.

6. Trading in MCK equity securities

6.1 Details of the acquisition or disposition of

Ordinary Shares during the six-month period

ending on 20 February 2025 (being the latest

practicable date before the date of this

Target Company Statement) by Directors,

Senior Managers or their associates and,

to the knowledge of MCK, any other person

holding or controlling 5% or more of the

Ordinary Shares are set out in Schedule 2.

6.2 Except as set out in Schedule 2:

(a) no Director, Senior Manager or

associate of a Director or Senior

Manager; or

(b) to the knowledge of MCK, any person

holding or controlling 5% or more of

any class of equity securities of MCK,

has acquired or disposed of equity securities

of MCK during the six-month period ending on

20 February 2025 (being the latest practicable

date before the date of this Target Company

Statement).

7. Acceptance of Offer by Directors

and Senior Managers

7.1 The table below sets out, as at the date of this

Target Company Statement, the name of every

Director and Senior Manager, and associate of

a Director and Senior Manager, who (to MCK’s

knowledge) has accepted or intends to accept

the Offer and the number of Ordinary Shares in

respect of which the person has accepted, or

intends to accept the Offer.

10

9. For the purposes of this Target Company Statement, the Independent

Directors have determined that the senior managers of MCK for the

purposes of the Takeovers Code are Stuart Nigel Bruce Harrison (Managing

Director), Anand Rambhai (Vice President Finance), Takeshi Ito (Vice

President Legal & Company Secretary), Kenneth Orr (Vice President

Operations), Louise Borton (Director, Property Management), Brendan

Davies (Director, International and Corporate Sales), Nathan Kruger

(Director, Information Technology), Lisa Maclean (Director, Human

Resources), Josie Wilson (Director, Revenue and Distribution) and Melanie

Beattie (Vice President Sales and Partnerships).

10. This information is based on responses to questionnaires circulated to

the Directors and Senior Managers by MCK after receipt of CDLHH NZ’s

Takeover Notice.

SECTION 2: TAKEOVERS CODE DISCLOSURES

NameDescriptionNumber of Ordinary Shares

Nathan KrugerSenior Manager134.80

SECTION 2: TAKEOVERS CODE DISCLOSURES

22MILLENNIUM & COPTHORNE HOTELS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED | TARGET COMPANY STATEMENT 2025
8. Ownership of equity securities of

CDLHH NZ and its related companies

8.1 Schedule 3 to this Target Company

Statement sets out, as at the date of this

Target Company Statement, the name

of every Director, Senior Manager and

associate of a Director or Senior Manager

who holds or controls equity securities of:

(a) CDLHH NZ; or

(b) any related company of CDLHH NZ

(other than MCK),

in each case, together with the number,

designation and percentage of equity

securities of that class of equity securities.

8.2 Because of CDLHH NZ’s current shareholding

in MCK, MCK and its subsidiaries are each

related companies of CDLHH NZ. Accordingly:

(a) the number, designation and

percentage of Ordinary Shares held

or controlled by every Director, Senior

Manager and associate of a Director or

Senior Manager is set out in Schedule 1

to this Target Company Statement.

(b) Schedule 4 sets out the name of every

related company of CDLHH NZ, in

which MCK holds or controls equity

securities of any class, together with the

number, designation and percentage of

equity securities of that class of equity

securities. Because MCK is a related

company of CDLHH NZ, this means that

all of MCK’s subsidiaries are also related

companies of CDLHH NZ. Accordingly, all

of the companies set out in Schedule 4

(other than MCK itself) are MCK’s

subsidiaries. In addition, because

CDLHH NZ (an associate of Directors

Eik Sheng Kwek and Kevin Hangchi)

controls MCK, it too will control the

equity securities set out Schedule 4

to this Target Company Statement.

8.3 Other than as set out in Schedules 1, 3 and 4,

neither MCK nor any of the Directors, Senior

Managers or their associates holds or controls

any equity securities of CDLHH NZ or any

related company of CDLHH NZ.

9. Trading in equity securities of CDLHH

NZ and its related companies

Other than the Ordinary Shares acquired

by CDLHH NZ in MCK set out in Schedule 2

(because CDLHH NZ is an associate of Directors

Eik Sheng Kwek and Kevin Hangchi), neither

MCK, nor any Director, Senior Manager or any

of their associates has acquired or disposed

of any equity securities of CDLHH NZ or any

related company of CDLHH NZ during the

six-month period before 20 February 2025

(being the latest practicable date before the

date of this Target Company Statement).

10. Arrangements between

CDLHH NZ and MCK

10.1 On 31 January 2025, CDLHH NZ agreed

with a request from MCK that if CDLHH NZ

should decide to proceed with a takeover

offer, CDLHH NZ would not make that offer

before 10 February 2025. This was intended

to allow MCK to release its annual results

for the 2024 financial year prior to MCK

releasing the Target Company Statement.

10.2 The Offer Document states that CDLHH NZ

is providing funding for the acquisition

by way of intercompany loan from its sole

shareholder (First 2000 Limited) and/or

its upstream parent company (Millennium

& Copthorne Hotels Limited) which are

also holding companies of MCK. The Offer

Document also states that the amount of the

loan is yet to be determined as the lender

will lend such amount as may be required

to undertake the Offer. The Offer Document

further states that there are no formal loan

terms because the loan is from a holding

SECTION 2: TAKEOVERS

CODE DISCLOSURES

(CONTINUED)

23
company to its (direct or indirect) subsidiary.

In its Offer Document, CDLHH NZ has indicated

that, although there are not currently any

arrangements to do so, because MCK and its

subsidiaries are also subsidiaries of CDLHH

NZ, MCK and its subsidiaries may be required

to provide financial assistance to that

lender, presumably if the Offer is declared

unconditional and CDLHH NZ acquires 100%

of the Ordinary Shares.

10.3 Other than as set out in paragraphs 10.1 and

10.2 above, no agreements or arrangements

(whether legally enforceable or not) have been

made, or are proposed to be made, between

CDLHH NZ or any associates of CDLHH NZ,

and MCK or any related company of MCK,

in connection with, in anticipation of, or in

response to, the Offer.

11. Relationship between

CDLHH NZ and Directors and

Senior Managers of MCK

11.1 Except as set out in paragraph 11.2 below,

no agreement or arrangement (whether

legally enforceable or not) has been made,

or is proposed to be made, between CDLHH

NZ and any associates of CDLHH NZ, and any

Director or Senior Manager or any related

company of MCK (including particulars of any

payment or other benefit proposed to be made

or given by way of compensation for loss of

office, or as to their remaining in or retiring

from office) in connection with, in anticipation

of, or in response to the Offer.

11


11.2 Because of CDLHH NZ’s majority shareholding

in MCK, MCK is a related company of CDLHH

NZ and therefore an associate of CDLHH

NZ for the purposes of the Takeovers Code.

Accordingly, the following disclosure relates

to an agreement between MCK (as an associate

of CDLHH NZ) and three Directors. The

independent directors of MCK (being Leslie

Preston, Colin Sim and Graham McKenzie)

have arrangements with MCK whereby they

will each be paid an initial fee of $30,000 for

the work they carry out in connection with the

takeover notice or Offer. If the circumstances

justify the fee being increased, MCK may

review the fee.

11.3 Except as set out in paragraph 11.4 below,

and at Schedule 5 of this Target Company

Statement, no Directors or Senior Managers of

MCK are also directors or senior managers of

CDLHH NZ, or a related company of CDLHH NZ.

11.4 As noted in paragraph 11.2 above, CDLHH NZ

and MCK are related companies. Therefore,

each of the Directors (as listed in paragraph 4)

and Senior Managers (as listed in footnote 1

on page 7) are automatically also directors

and senior managers (as applicable) of a

related company of CDLHH NZ (being MCK).

In addition, Schedule 5 of this Target Company

Statement sets out the Directors or Senior

Managers of MCK that are also a director or

senior manager of related companies of

CDLHH NZ (other than MCK).

12. Agreement between MCK, and

Directors and Senior Managers

12.1 No agreement or arrangement (whether

legally enforceable or not) has been made,

or is proposed to be made, between MCK

or any related company of MCK, and any of

the Directors or Senior Managers or their

associates of MCK or its related companies,

under which a payment or other benefit may

be made or given by way of compensation

for loss of office, or as to their remaining in

or retiring from office in connection with, in

anticipation of, or in response to, the Offer.

11. This information is based on responses to questionnaires circulated to

the Directors and Senior Managers by MCK after receipt of CDLHH NZ’s

Takeover Notice.

SECTION 2: TAKEOVERS CODE DISCLOSURES

SECTION 2: TAKEOVERS CODE DISCLOSURES

24MILLENNIUM & COPTHORNE HOTELS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED | TARGET COMPANY STATEMENT 2025
13. Interests of Directors and Senior

Managers of MCK in contracts of

CDLHH NZ or its related companies

13.1 Except as set out in paragraph 13.2 below,

no Director or Senior Manager or any of their

associates has an interest in any contract to

which CDLHH NZ, or any related company of

CDLHH NZ, is a party.

12

13.2 As explained in paragraph 8.2, CDLHH NZ and

MCK are related companies. Accordingly, the

following disclosures are made regarding

contractual arrangements to which MCK

or MCK’s subsidiary Hospitality Services

Limited (being related companies of CDLHH

NZ) is a party and in which the Directors or

Senior Managers have interests. Each of the

Directors and Senior Managers are employed

or engaged by MCK or, in the case of the

Senior Managers other than MCK’s Managing

Director Stuart Harrison, Hospitality Services

Limited and, accordingly, have interests in

the contracts relating to their employment or

engagement. The contracts of employment

or engagement for each of the Directors

and Senior Managers were entered into in

the ordinary course of MCK’s business and

are on usual terms and conditions, including

as to monetary compensation.

13A. Interests of MCK’s substantial

security holders in material contracts

of CDLHH NZ or its related companies

13A.1 Except for the potential funding arrangement

described in paragraph 10.2, no person who,

to the knowledge of the Directors or the

Senior Managers holds or controls 5% or more

of any class of equity securities of MCK has

an interest in any material contract to which

CDLHH NZ, or any related company of CDLHH

NZ, is a party.

14. Additional information

14.1 In the opinion of the Directors, no additional

information, to the knowledge of MCK is

required to make the information in the

Offer Document correct or not misleading.

15. Recommendation

15.1 The Board has appointed a committee of

independent directors (the Independent

Committee) to attend to all matters

associated with the Offer. The Independent

Committee comprises Leslie Preston (Chair),

Colin Sim and Graham McKenzie.

15.2 The Independent Committee has carefully

considered a full range of expert advice

available to them (including Northington

Partners Limited’s Independent Adviser’s

Report on the merits of the Offer) and

unanimously recommend that holders of

Ordinary Shares do not accept that Offer for

the reasons set out in the Letter from the Chair

of the Independent Directors and Section 1

(Independent Directors’ Recommendation)

earlier in this Target Company Statement.

15.3 Kevin Hangchi and Eik Sheng Kwek, as

associates of CDLHH NZ, have a conflict

of interest in respect of the Offer. For this

reason, they abstain from making any

recommendation as to whether to accept

or reject the Offer.

15.4 Mr Stuart Harrison, being the Managing

Director of MCK, has a potential conflict of

interest in respect of the Offer because of

his executive role with MCK. For this reason,

Mr Harrison also abstains from making any

recommendation as to whether to accept or

reject the Offer.

SECTION 2: TAKEOVERS

CODE DISCLOSURES

(CONTINUED)

12. This information is based on responses to questionnaires circulated to

the Directors and Senior Managers by MCK after receipt of CDLHH NZ’s

Takeover Notice.

25
16. Actions of MCK

16.1 There are no material agreements or

arrangements (whether legally enforceable

or not) of MCK or any related company of

MCK entered into as a consequence of, in

response to, or in connection with, the Offer.

16.2 There are no negotiations underway as

a consequence of, in response to, or in

connection with the Offer that relate to,

or could result in:

(a) an extraordinary transaction, such

as a merger, amalgamation or

reorganisation, involving MCK or

any of its related companies; or

(b) the acquisition or disposition of

material assets by MCK or any of

its related companies; or

(c) an acquisition of equity securities by, or

of, MCK or any related company MCK; or

(d) any material change in the issued equity

securities of MCK, or the policy of the

Board relating to distributions, of MCK.

16.3 As at the date of this Target Company

Statement, there are no discussions or

negotiations underway between MCK and

any other party in respect of a competing

takeover offer or any other similar transaction.

The Independent Committee does not

anticipate any discussions or negotiations

of this nature during the Offer period.

17. Equity securities of MCK

17.1 As at the date of this Target Company

Statement, MCK has 105,478,743 Ordinary

Shares on issue (excluding the 99,547

Ordinary Shares held as treasury stock).

These are all fully paid.

17.2 MCK has no options, or rights to acquire

equity securities, on issue.

17.3 Subject to the NZX Listing Rules and MCK’s

constitution, Shareholders have in respect of

each Ordinary Share:

(a) subject to the rights of holders of any

shares or other equity securities which

confer special rights as to dividends,

the right to an equal share in dividends

authorised by the Board;

(b) subject to the rights of holders of any

shares or other equity securities which

confer special rights as to distributions,

the right to an equal share in the

distribution of surplus assets on

liquidation of MCK; and

(c) the right to cast one vote on a show of

hands or the right to cast one vote on a

poll (for each share held), at a meeting

of shareholders on any resolution,

including a resolution to:

(i) appoint or remove a director or

auditor;

(ii) alter MCK’s constitution;

(iii) approve a major transaction by

MCK;

(iv) approve an amalgamation

involving MCK (other than an

amalgamation of a wholly

owned subsidiary); and

(v) put MCK into liquidation.

SECTION 2: TAKEOVERS CODE DISCLOSURES

SECTION 2: TAKEOVERS CODE DISCLOSURES

26MILLENNIUM & COPTHORNE HOTELS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED | TARGET COMPANY STATEMENT 2025
17.4 In addition to the Ordinary Shares, MCK has

52,739,543 fully paid Preference Shares on

issue however these are not equity securities

for the purposes of the Takeovers Code, and

do not form part of the Offer. The Preference

Shares are non-voting and rank equally

with the Ordinary Shares with respect to all

distributions made by MCK (including without

limitation, to dividend payments) except

for any distribution made in the context

of a liquidation. MCK may, in its discretion,

subject to the approval of the holders of the

Preference Shares by way of special resolution,

redeem the Preference Shares, in whole or

in part (on a pro rata basis). The terms upon

which the Preference Shares are issued is set

out in the simplified disclosure prospectus

issued by MCK on 17 February 2014.

18. Financial information

18.1 On 24 February 2025, MCK released its

financial results for the twelve months ended

31 December 2024, which included audited

financial statements for that period. A copy

of the audited financial statements, media

release and investor presentation can be

found at https://www.nzx.com/companies/

MCK/announcements?year=2025 or at MCK’s

investor website at https://mckhotels.co.nz/

investors/nzx-announcements/.

18.2 A copy of MCK’s most recent annual report

(being the annual report for the period

ended 31 December 2023) is available on

MCK’s website at https://mckhotels.co.nz/

investors/annual-reports-mck/.

18.3 Each person to whom the Offer is made may

also request a non-electronic copy of that

annual report from MCK by making a written

request to enquiries@mckhotels.co.nz or,

alternatively, by making a written request

to Computershare Investor Services Limited

(enquiry@computershare.co.nz).

18.4 MCK’s most recent half-yearly report since

its annual report for the year ended 31

December 2023 (being the half-yearly report

for the six months ended 30 June 2024)

is available on MCK’s website at https://

mckhotels.co.nz/investors/mck-2018-2013/.

No interim report has been issued since the

issue of the half yearly report for the six

months ended 30 June 2024.

18.5 There have been the following material

changes in the financial or trading position,

or prospects, of MCK, since its 31 December

2023 annual report:

(a) As mentioned in paragraph 18.1

above, on 24 February 2025 MCK

released its financial results for the

twelve months ended 31 December

2024. Those results included the

following material changes in the

financial and trading position of MCK:

(i) a 21% increase in revenue to

$176.2 million from the position

for the financial year which

ended 31 December 2023 (the

previous financial year), MCK’s

highest revenue figure in five

years, and a 32.1% increase in

operating profit to $42.5 million;

(ii) a 25.6% increase in profit before

tax to $47.1 million compared to

the position under the previous

financial year;

(iii) a profit after tax of $2.8 million

for the twelve months ended

31 December 2024, reflecting

the deferred tax adjustment

which was reported in the

interim results. Excluding this

adjustment, the profit after tax

attributed to MCK shareholders

would have been $27.2 million;

SECTION 2: TAKEOVERS

CODE DISCLOSURES

(CONTINUED)

27
(iv) total assets as at 31 December

2024 at book value of $762.3

million; and

(v) a final dividend in respect of

the 2024 financial year was not

declared due to the conditions

of the Offer, which do not allow a

dividend to be paid or declared.

(b) On 23 October 2024, MCK announced

that it had entered into an agreement

to acquire The Mayfair Hotel in

Christchurch. This hotel comprises

67 guest rooms and suites and has a

cocktail bar, conference and meeting

facilities and a café and kitchen.

The purchase price was $31.9 million

plus GST and MCK used its existing

cash resources and bank facilities

to complete the acquisition. This

transaction settled on 22 January 2025.

(c) On 7 August 2024, MCK announced

its financial results for the six months

ended 30 June 2024. Those results

included the unaudited financial

statements for that period and

included the following material

changes in the financial and trading

position and prospects of MCK:

(i) revenue growth of 42% to

$85.32 million and an increase

in net profit before tax of 88% to

$21.53 million compared to the

same period the previous year.

The first half of the financial

year was the first time in five

years where the hotels have

been able to operate without the

impact of pandemic restrictions,

weather-related issues or

large staffing shortages;

(ii) a rise in hotel occupancy to 69.0%

(compared to 59.8% in the same

period the previous year). MCK

was able to show improving

occupancy and profit in the hotels

business, despite a slowdown in

demand for corporate travel and

meetings;

(iii) a one-off, non-cash deferred tax

liability adjustment of $25.76

million, which arose from a change

in tax legislation that came into

effect earlier in 2024. This related

to the depreciation of buildings

owned by MCK; and

(iv) as a result of the adjustment,

which did not affect MCK’s

trading position or cash flow, MCK

recorded an after-tax loss for the

period of $10.17 million.

(d) On 1 August 2024, MCK advised that

changes to tax legislation which removed

the ability to claim tax depreciation

on commercial buildings would result

in a one-off, non-cash deferred tax

liability adjustment of approximately

$26 million. This arose from a change in

tax legislation that came into effect in

2024 and relates to the depreciation of

buildings owned by MCK. MCK noted that

the adjustment would have no impact on

MCK’s trading profitability or cash flows.

(e) On 26 April 2024, MCK announced that it

had reached conditional agreement with

the Whangarei District Council

for the purchase of land in Whangarei’s

CBD for the development of a hotel.

The purchase price was $2.24 million, and

the acquisition was conditional

on due diligence. The transaction settled

on 29 August 2024 and MCK used

existing cash on hand to settle

the purchase.

SECTION 2: TAKEOVERS CODE DISCLOSURES

SECTION 2: TAKEOVERS CODE DISCLOSURES

28MILLENNIUM & COPTHORNE HOTELS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED | TARGET COMPANY STATEMENT 2025
18.6 Other than as set out elsewhere in this

Target Company Statement, or as contained

in the Independent Adviser’s Report:

(a) there have been no known material

changes in the financial or trading

position, or prospects, of MCK since the

31 December 2023 annual report; and

(b) there is no other information about

the assets, liabilities, profitability

and financial affairs of MCK that

could reasonably be expected to be

material to the making of a decision

by Shareholders to accept or reject

the Offer.

19. Independent advice

on merits of Offer

Northington Partners Limited is the

independent adviser who has provided a

report under Rule 21 of the Takeovers

Code on the merits of the Offer. A copy of

Northington Partners Limited’s Independent

Adviser’s Report is attached as the Appendix

to this Target Company Statement.

20. Asset valuations

20.1 Except as set out in paragraph 20.2, this

Target Company Statement does not refer

to a valuation of any asset of MCK.

20.2 The Independent Adviser’s Report refers

to the valuation of certain property assets

of MCK (as set out on pages 23 and 41 of

the Independent Adviser’s Report). Copies

of those valuation reports are available for

inspection at Floor 7, 23 Customs Street East,

Auckland Central, Auckland. Alternatively, a

copy of any such valuation reports will be sent

to any offeree by making such a request to

enquiries@mckhotels.co.nz. As part of making

such a report available to an offeree, that

offeree may first be required to sign a hold

harmless letter in favour of the author of

the relevant report.

20.3 The Takeovers Panel has granted an

exemption to permit certain commercially

sensitive information to be redacted from

those valuation reports.

21. Prospective financial information

21.1 The Independent Adviser’s Report contains

prospective financial information in relation to

MCK. The principal assumptions on which the

prospective financial information is based are

set out in the Independent Adviser’s Report.

21.2 Other than the prospective financial

information referred to in paragraph 21.1

above, this Target Company Statement does

not refer to any other prospective financial

information about MCK.

22. Sales of unquoted equity

securities under Offer

22.1 There are no unquoted equity securities

that are subject of the Offer.

23. Market prices for quoted equity

securities under Offer

23.1 The Ordinary Shares are quoted on the

NZX Main Board.

23.2 The closing price on the NZX Main Board

of the Ordinary Shares on:

(a) 20 February 2025, being the latest

practicable working day before the

date on which this Target Company

Statement is sent to Shareholders,

was NZ$2.40; and

(b) 17 January 2025, being the last

day on which the NZX was open for

business before the date on which

MCK received CDLHH NZ’s takeover

notice, was NZ$1.80.

SECTION 2: TAKEOVERS

CODE DISCLOSURES

(CONTINUED)

29SECTION 2: TAKEOVERS CODE DISCLOSURES
23.3 The highest and lowest closing market prices

of the Ordinary Shares on the NZX Main Board

(and the relevant dates) during the six months

before the Notice Date, were as follows:

(a) the highest closing market price was

NZ$1.90 (on 23 December 2024); and

(b) the lowest closing market price was

NZ$1.66 (on 4 October 2024).

23.4 During the six-month period before the Notice

Date, MCK did not issue any equity securities

or make any changes to any equity securities

on issue which could have affected the market

prices of Ordinary Shares referred to above.

23.5 There is no other information about the

market price of the Ordinary Shares that would

reasonably be expected to be material to the

making of a decision by Shareholders to accept

or reject the Offer.

24. Other information

24.1 The following information is considered

by the Directors to be information that

could reasonably be expected to be

material to the making of a decision by

holders of Ordinary Shares as to whether

to accept or reject the Offer, and the

timing of the giving of any acceptance:

(a) the terms of the Offer state that,

once given, acceptances may not

be withdrawn by acceptors unless

CDLHH NZ fails to pay acceptors in

accordance with the Takeovers Code;

(b) if CDLHH NZ increases the price of

the Offer, CDLHH NZ must provide

the increased price to all holders of

Ordinary Shares whose shares are

acquired under the Offer, whether or

not the shareholder accepted the

Offer before or after the price was

increased; and

(c) payment for Ordinary Shares in respect

of which the Offer is accepted will

only be made by CDLHH NZ within five

working days of the later of the date

on which the relevant acceptance is

received, the date on which the Offer

becomes unconditional or 8 May 2025.

Early acceptance of the Offer will

therefore not result in payment being

made any earlier than the later date

described above.

25. Approval of this Target

Company Statement

25.1 The contents of this Target Company

Statement have been approved by the

Independent Directors of MCK

(Leslie Preston, Colin Sim and Graham

McKenzie), who have been delegated

with authority by the Directors to do so.

25.2 As disclosed in paragraph 15, Eik Sheng Kwek

and Kevin Hangchi have a conflict of interest

in respect of the Offer and Stuart Harrison has

a potential conflict of interest in respect of

the Offer. As a result, they have not formally

approved this Target Company Statement.

13


26. Interpretation

26.1 In this Target Company Statement:

Board means the board of directors of MCK;

CDI means CDL Investments New Zealand

Limited, MCK’s 65% owned subsidiary;

CDLHH NZ means CDL Hotels Holdings New

Zealand Limited;

Directors means the directors of MCK;

SECTION 2: TAKEOVERS CODE DISCLOSURES

13. Mr Stuart Harrison, who is MCK’s Managing Director, has signed this

Target Company Statement in his capacity as Chief Executive Officer

of MCK only, as required by the Takeovers Code.

30MILLENNIUM & COPTHORNE HOTELS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED | TARGET COMPANY STATEMENT 2025
Independent Adviser’s Report means the

independent adviser’s report provided by

Northington Partners Limited under Rule 21 of

the Takeovers Code and set out in the Appendix

to this Target Company Statement;

Independent Committee has the meaning

given to that term in paragraph 15.1 of

section 2 of this Target Company Statement;

Independent Directors means Colin Sim,

Leslie Preston and Graham McKenzie;

MCK means Millennium & Copthorne Hotels

New Zealand Limited;

Notice Date means 20 January 2025;

NZ$ or $ means New Zealand dollars;

NZX means NZX Limited;

NZX Main Board means the main board equity

securities exchange operated by NZX;

Offer has the meaning given to that term

in paragraph 2.1 of section 2 of this Target

Company Statement;

Offer Document has the meaning given

to that term paragraph 2.2 of section 2 of

this Target Company Statement;

Ordinary Shares means ordinary shares

in MCK;

Preference Shares has the meaning given

to that term in paragraph 2.3 of section 2

of this Target Company Statement;

RPS Offer has the meaning given to that

term in paragraph 2.3 of section 2 of this

Target Company Statement;

Senior Manager has the meaning given to

that term in paragraph 5.3 of section 2 of

this Target Company Statement;

Shareholders means the holders of Ordinary

Shares which are the subject of the Offer

by CDLHH NZ;

Takeover s Ac t means the Takeovers Act

1993; and

Takeover s Code means the Takeovers Code

approved by the Takeovers Code Approval

Order 2000 (as amended).

26.2 Words and expressions defined in the

Takeovers Act or the Takeovers Code and not

otherwise defined in this Target Company

Statement have the same meaning when

used in this Target Company Statement.

27. Certificate

To the best of our knowledge and belief,

after making proper enquiry, the information

contained in or accompanying this Target

Company Statement is, in all material respects,

true and correct and not misleading, whether

by omission of any information or otherwise,

and includes all the information required to be

disclosed by MCK under the Takeovers Code.

Signed by:

SECTION 2: TAKEOVERS

CODE DISCLOSURES

(CONTINUED)

Leslie Preston

Director of MCK

Stuart Harrison

Chief Executive

Officer of MCK

Colin Sim

Director of MCK

Anand Rambhai

Chief Financial

Officer of MCK

31SECTION 2: TAKEOVERS CODE DISCLOSURES
SECTION 2: TAKEOVERS CODE DISCLOSURES

THIS PAGE HAS INTENTIONALLY BEEN LEFT BLANK

32MILLENNIUM & COPTHORNE HOTELS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED | TARGET COMPANY STATEMENT 202532MILLENNIUM & COPTHORNE HOTELS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED | TARGET COMPANY STATEMENT 2025

3333
SCHEDULES 1–5

Left: Fine dining at the award winning One80 Restaurant

at Copthorne Hotel Wellington Oriental Bay.

SCHEDULES 1–5

34MILLENNIUM & COPTHORNE HOTELS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED | TARGET COMPANY STATEMENT 2025
SCHEDULES 1–5

Schedule 1: Ordinary Shares owned by Directors, Senior

Managers and their associates (paragraph 5.3)

Notes:

1. This information is taken from responses to questionnaires circulated to the Directors and Senior Managers by MCK after receipt of CDLHH NZ’s Takeover Notice.

2. City Developments Limited is the ultimate holding company of CDLHH NZ. It ultimately controls the Ordinary Shares held by CDLHH NZ, through the following

wholly-owned subsidiaries: Singapura Developments (Private) Limited, Agapier Investments Limited, Reach Across International Limited, Millennium &

Copthorne Hotels Limited, M&C Asia Holdings (UK) Limited, M&C Hospitality Holdings (Asia) Limited, M&C Hotel Enterprises (Asia) Limited, Hong Leong Hotels

Pte. Ltd. and First 2000 Limited.

3. The percentage numbers are rounded to two decimal places.

NameDescription

Number of Ordinary

Shares held or controlled

Percentage of class

CDL Hotels Holdings

New Zealand Limited

Associate of a Director

(Eik Sheng Kwek and Kevin Hangchi)

80,017,014

75.86% (excluding

treasury stock)

City Developments Limited

Associate of a Director

(Eik Sheng Kwek and Kevin Hangchi)

80,017,014

75.86% (excluding

treasury stock)

Nathan KrugerSenior Manager134.800.00%

Schedule 2: Trading in equity securities in MCK (paragraph 6)

Notes:

1. This information is based on (i) responses to questionnaires circulated to the Directors and Senior Managers by MCK after receipt of CDLHH NZ’s Takeover Notice

and (ii) substantial product holder notices filed with NZX.

Name

Disposal or

acquisition

Number of equity

securities acquired or

disposed of

Designation of

equity security

Date

Consideration per

equity security

CDL Hotels Holdings

New Zealand Limited

Acquisition5,273,937Ordinary shares 29 October 2024$1.73

Schedule 3: Ownership of equity securities of CDLHH NZ and its related companies

(other than MCK) – Directors, Senior Managers and their associates (paragraph 8.1)

Notes:

1. This information is taken from (i) responses to questionnaires circulated to the Directors and Senior Managers by MCK after receipt of CDLHH NZ’s Takeover

Notice (ii) New Zealand Companies Office records and (iii) information set out in Schedule 1 of the Offer Document.

2. City Developments Limited is the ultimate holding company of CDLHH NZ. It ultimately controls the shares in CDLHH NZ, through the following wholly-owned

subsidiaries: Singapura Developments (Private) Limited, Agapier Investments Limited, Reach Across International Limited, Millennium & Copthorne Hotels

Limited, M&C Asia Holdings (UK) Limited, M&C Hospitality Holdings (Asia) Limited, M&C Hotel Enterprises (Asia) Limited, Hong Leong Hotels Pte. Ltd. and First

2000 Limited.

3. The percentage numbers are rounded to two decimal places.

NameDescription

Company in which

securities are held or

controlled

Designation of

equity security

Number of equity

securities held or

controlled

Percentage of total

number of equity

securities of class

First 2000 Limited

Associate of a

Director

(Eik Sheng Kwek

and Kevin Hangchi)

CDL Hotels Holdings

New Zealand Limited

– shares held

Ordinary Shares54,221100%

City Developments

Limited

Associate of

a Director

(Eik Sheng Kwek

and Kevin Hangchi)

CDL Hotels Holdings

New Zealand Limited

– shares controlled

Ordinary Shares54,221100%

Kevin HangchiDirector

City Developments

Limited

Ordinary Shares50,0000.01%

Kevin HangchiDirector

City Developments

Limited

Preference Shares24,0600.01%

Kevin HangchiDirector

Hong Leong Investment

Holdings PTE Limited

Ordinary Shares5180.37%

SNB Harrison

Family Trust

Associate of

a Director

(Stuart Harrison)

CDL Investments

New Zealand Limited

Ordinary Shares21,0060.00%

35
Schedule 4: Ownership of equity securities of CDLHH NZ

and its related companies – MCK (paragraph 8.2)

Company in which equity securities are

held or controlled

Designation of equity security

Number of equity

securities held or

controlled

Percentage of total

number of equity

securities of class

CDL Investments

New Zealand Limited

Ordinary Shares190,591,29765.31%

Millennium & Copthorne NZ LimitedOrdinary Shares100100.00%

CDL Land New Zealand LimitedOrdinary Shares1,008,60065.31%

All Seasons Hotels

and Resorts Limited

Ordinary Shares100100.00%

Context Securities LimitedOrdinary Shares11,364100.00%

KIN Holdings LimitedRedeemable Preference Shares4,268,708100.00%

KIN Holdings LimitedOrdinary Shares1000100.00%

Kingsgate International Corporation LimitedOrdinary Shares61,128,784100.00%

Kingsgate Hotels LimitedOrdinary Shares100100.00%

Quantum LimitedOrdinary Shares40,833,818100.00%

Hospitality Group LimitedOrdinary Shares69,999,172100.00%

Hospitality Leases LimitedOrdinary Shares27,130,654100.00%

Hospitality Services LimitedOrdinary Shares3,000,002100.00%

Mayfair Luxury Hotels LimitedOrdinary Shares17,623100.00%

MCKOrdinary Shares99,5470.00%

QINZ (Anzac Avenue) Limited

Non-participating Redeemable Preference

shares

23,783,196100.00%

QINZ (Anzac Avenue) LimitedOrdinary Shares100100.00%

Kingsgate Hotels and Resorts LimitedOrdinary Shares100100.00%

Kingsgate Holdings Pty LimitedOrdinary Shares5,300,002100.00%

Kingsgate Hotel Pty LimitedOrdinary Shares2100.00%

Kingsgate Investments Pty LimitedOrdinary Shares35,000,002100.00%

Millennium & Copthorne Hotels Pty LimitedOrdinary Shares10100.00%

Hotelcorp New Zealand Pty LimitedOrdinary Shares25,191,867100.00%

Marquee Brisbane Hotel Pty LimitedOrdinary Shares150.00%

Marquee Brisbane Hotel Pty 2 LimitedOrdinary Shares150.00%

Marquee Hotel Holdings Pty LimitedOrdinary Shares250.00%

Marquee Hotel Operations Pty LimitedOrdinary Shares150.00%

Notes:

1. This information is taken from (i) responses to questionnaires circulated to the Directors and Senior Managers

by MCK after receipt of CDLHH NZ’s Takeover Notice or (ii) which was otherwise provided by MCK management.

2. MCK holds the 99,547 Ordinary Shares in MCK as treasury stock.

3. The percentage numbers are rounded to two decimal places.

SCHEDULES 1–5

SCHEDULES 1–5

36MILLENNIUM & COPTHORNE HOTELS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED | TARGET COMPANY STATEMENT 2025
Part A – Kevin Hangchi (Director of MCK)

Name of entityPosition

CDLHH NZDirector

KIN Holdings LimitedDirector

SCHEDULES 1–5 (CONTINUED)

Name of entityPosition

KIN Holdings LimitedDirector

Quantum LimitedDirector

All Seasons Hotels and Resorts LtdDirector

Context Securities LimitedDirector

Kingsgate Hotels LimitedDirector

Kingsgate International Corporation LimitedDirector

Hospitality Group LimitedDirector

Mayfair Luxury Hotels LimitedDirector

Kingsgate Hotels and Resorts LimitedDirector

QINZ (Anzac Avenue) LimitedDirector

Hospitality Leases LimitedDirector

Hospitality Services LimitedDirector

Millennium & Copthorne NZ LimitedDirector

Part B – Stuart Harrison (Director of MCK)

Name of entityPosition

CDL Land New Zealand LimitedDirector

Hospitality Services LimitedSenior Manager

Part C – Takeshi Ito (Senior Manager of MCK)

Name of entityPosition

Quantum LimitedDirector

Millennium & Copthorne NZ LimitedDirector

All Seasons Hotels and Resorts LimitedDirector

Context Securities LimitedDirector

Mayfair Luxury Hotels LimitedDirector

Kingsgate Hotels and Resorts LimitedDirector

QINZ (Anzac Avenue) LimitedDirector

Kingsgate Hotels LimitedDirector

Hospitality Leases LimitedDirector

Hospitality Services LimitedDirector

Kingsgate International Corporation LimitedDirector

Kingsgate Holdings Pty LimitedDirector

Kingsgate Investments Pty LimitedDirector

Millennium & Copthorne Hotels Pty LimitedDirector

Hotelcorp New Zealand Pty LimitedDirector

Hospitality Services LimitedSenior Manager

Part D – Anand Rambhai (Senior Manager of MCK)

Part E – Kenneth Orr (Senior Manager of MCK)

Name of entityPosition

Quantum LimitedDirector

Hospitality Group LimitedDirector

Hospitality Services LimitedDirector

Part F – Louise Borton (Senior Manager of MCK)

Name of entityPosition

Hospitality Services LimitedSenior Manager

Part G – Brendan Davies (Senior Manager of MCK)

Name of entityPosition

Hospitality Services LimitedSenior Manager

Schedule 5: Directors and Senior Managers’

roles in related companies of CDLHH NZ

Part H – Nathan Kruger (Senior Manager of MCK)

Name of entityPosition

Hospitality Services LimitedSenior Manager

Part I – Lisa Maclean (Senior Manager of MCK)

Name of entityPosition

Hospitality Services LimitedSenior Manager

Part J – Josie Wilson (Senior Manager of MCK)

Name of entityPosition

Hospitality Services LimitedSenior Manager

Part K – Melanie Beattie (Senior Manager of MCK)

Name of entityPosition

Hospitality Services LimitedSenior Manager

Part L – Eik Sheng Kwek (Director of MCK)

Name of entityPosition

125 OBS (Nominees 1) LimitedDirector

125 OBS (Nominees 2) LimitedDirector

125 OBS GP LimitedDirector

58 High Street Pty LtdDirector

Actas Holdings Pte. Ltd.Director

Adelanto Investments Pte. Ltd.Director

Allinvest Holding Pte LtdDirector

Allsgate Properties LimitedDirector

Alphagate Holdings LimitedDirector

Androgate Properties LimitedDirector

Aquarius Properties Pte. Ltd.Director

Archyield LimitedDirector

Ascent View Holdings Pte. Ltd.Director

Aster Land Development Pte LtdDirector

Aston Properties Pte LtdDirector

Atlasgate SG Holdings Pte. Ltd.Director

Atlasgate UK Holdings LimitedDirector

Atlasgate UK Properties LimitedDirector

ATOS Holding GmbHDirector

Baynes Investments Pte LtdDirector

Beaumont Properties LimitedDirector

Beijing Fortune Hotel Co., Ltd.Director

Bellevue Properties Pte. Ltd.Director

Bestro Holdings LimitedDirector

Bloomshine Holdings LimitedDirector

37
BOP Luxembourg (125 OBS) 2 S.à r.l.Director

Branbury Investments LtdDirector

Bravogate Holdings S.à r.l.Director

Bridge North LimitedDirector

Camborne Developments Pte LtdDirector

Canterbury Riverside OpCo LimitedDirector

Canterbury Riverside Propco LimitedDirector

Canvey Developments Pte. Ltd.Director

CDL Ace Pte. Ltd.Director

CDL Acquisitions Pte. Ltd.Director

CDL Aquila Pte. Ltd.Director

CDL Australia Holdings Pty LtdDirector

CDL Centroid Pte. Ltd.Director

CDL CityInd Pte. Ltd.Director

CDL Cityscape Pte. Ltd.Director

CDL Commercial REIT Management Pte. Ltd.Director

CDL Conservo Pte. Ltd.Director

CDL Constellation Pte. Ltd.Director

CDL Crestview Holdings Pte. Ltd.Director

CDL Crown REIT Management Pte. Ltd.Director

CDL Entertainment & Leisure Pte LtdDirector

CDL Evergreen Pte. Ltd.Director

CDL Galliard Grand GP LimitedDirector

CDLHH NZDirector

CDL Hotels (Chelsea) LimitedDirector

CDL Hotels (Korea) Ltd.Director

CDL Hotels (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd.Director

CDL Hotels (U.K.) LimitedDirector

CDL Hotels Australia Holdings (SG) Pte. Ltd.Director

CDL Hotels Australia Holdings Pty LtdDirector

CDL Hotels Japan Pte. Ltd.Director

CDL Infinity Pte. Ltd.Director

CDL Investments New Zealand LimitedDirector

CDL Kingtse Pte. Ltd.Director

CDL Land Pte LtdDirector

CDL Libra Commercial Pte. Ltd.Director

CDL Libra Pte. Ltd.Director

CDL Management Services Pte. Ltd.Director

CDL Netherlands Investments B.V.Director

CDL Pavona Pte. Ltd.Director

CDL Pegasus Pte. Ltd.Director

CDL Perseus Pte. Ltd.Director

CDL Pisces Commercial Pte. Ltd.Director

CDL Pisces Serviced Residences Pte. Ltd.Director

CDL Pro Star Development Pty LtdDirector

CDL Properties B.V.Director

CDL Queensray Pte. Ltd.Director

CDL Real Estate Asset Managers Pte. Ltd.Director

CDL Real Estate Investment Managers Pte. Ltd.Director

CDL Regulus Pte. Ltd.Director

CDL Sakura Pte. Ltd.Director

CDL Shanghai Holdings Pte. Ltd.Director

CDL-Suzhou Investment Pte LtdDirector

Central Mall Pte LtdDirector

Centro Investment Holding Pte. Ltd.Director

Centro Property Holding Pte. Ltd.Director

Chalon Heritage Hotel Holdings SASSenior Manager

Chalon Haritage Hotel SNCSenior Manager

Chania Holdings LimitedDirector

Chestnut Avenue Developments Pte. Ltd.Director

City Apex Pte. Ltd.Director

City Bonsai Pte. Ltd.Director

City Boost Pte. Ltd.Director

City Century Pte. Ltd.Director

City Condominiums Pte LtdDirector

City Connected Communities Pte. Ltd.Director

City Delta Pte. Ltd.Director

City Developments Investments Pte. Ltd.Director

City Developments Realty LimitedDirector

City Elite Pte LtdDirector

City Gemini Pte. Ltd.Director

City Grand Investments LimitedDirector

City Hotels Pte. Ltd.Director

City Ikonik Pte. Ltd.Director

City Leo Pte. Ltd.Director

City Lux Pte. Ltd.Director

City Montage Pte. Ltd.Director

City Oasis Pte. Ltd.Director

City Orchard Pte. Ltd.Director

City Platinum Holdings Pte. Ltd.Director

City REIT Management Pte. Ltd.Director

City Resyde Pte. Ltd.Director

City Sceptre Investments Pte. Ltd.Director

City Serviced Offices Pte. Ltd.Director

City Sol Luna Holdings Pte. Ltd.Director

City Sol Pte. Ltd.Director

City Strategic Equity Pte. Ltd.Director

City Sunshine Holdings Pte. Ltd.Director

City Symphony Pte. Ltd.Director

City Thrive Pte. Ltd.Director

Citydev Real Estate (Singapore) Pte LtdDirector

Citydev Venture Holdings LimitedDirector

CityNexus (UK) LimitedDirector

CityNexus Pte. Ltd.Director

Cityview Place Holdings Pte. Ltd.Director

Cityzens Development Pte. Ltd.Director

Copthorne (Nominees) LimitedDirector

Copthorne Aberdeen LimitedDirector

Copthorne Hotel (Birmingham) LimitedDirector

Copthorne Hotel (Cardiff) LimitedDirector

Copthorne Hotel (Effingham Park) LimitedDirector

Copthorne Hotel (Gatwick) LimitedDirector

Copthorne Hotel (Manchester) LimitedDirector

Copthorne Hotel (Merry Hill) Construction LimitedDirector

Copthorne Hotel (Merry Hill) LimitedDirector

Copthorne Hotel (Newcastle) LimitedDirector

Copthorne Hotel (Plymouth) LimitedDirector

Copthorne Hotel (Slough) LimitedDirector

SCHEDULES 1–5

SCHEDULES 1–5

38MILLENNIUM & COPTHORNE HOTELS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED | TARGET COMPANY STATEMENT 2025
SCHEDULES 1–5 (CONTINUED)

Copthorne Hotel Holdings LimitedDirector

Copthorne Hotels LimitedDirector

Copthorne Orchid Hotel Singapore Pte LtdDirector

Copthorne Orchid Penang Sdn. Bhd.Director

Crescent View Developments Pte. Ltd.Director

Name of entityPosition

Delfi One Investments Pte. Ltd.Director

Delfi Three Investments Pte. Ltd.Director

Delfi Two Investments Pte. Ltd.Director

Diplomat Hotel Holding LimitedDirector

EastWest Portfolio Pte. Ltd.Director

Easy Thrive Ventures LimitedDirector

Educado Company LimitedDirector

Elite Hotel Management Services Pte. Ltd.Director

Ellinois Management Services Pte. Ltd.Director

Euroform (S) Pte. LimitedDirector

Fergurson Hotel Holdings LimitedDirector

Fergurson Investment Corp.Director

Finite Properties Investment LimitedDirector

First Platinum Holdings Pte. Ltd.Director

Five Star Assurance, Inc.Director

Freshview Developments Pte. Ltd.Director

Friars Road Manco LimitedDirector

GHL CDL Morden LimitedDirector

Glades Properties Pte. Ltd.Director

Grand Plaza Hotel Corporation*Director

Grande Strategic Pte. Ltd.Director

Grange 100 Pte. Ltd.Director

Granmil Holdings Pte LtdDirector

Greystand Holdings LimitedDirector

Guan Realty (Private) LimitedDirector

Harbour Land CorporationDirector

Harbour View Hotel Pte LtdDirector

Harrow Entertainment Pte LtdDirector

Heritage Pro International LimitedDirector

Highline Holdings LimitedDirector

Highline Investments GP LimitedDirector

Highline Properties GP LimitedDirector

Hoko Fitzroy Pty LtdDirector

Hoko Kenmore Pty LtdDirector

Hoko Macaulay Pty LtdDirector

Hoko Mina Pty LtdDirector

Hoko Spencer Pty LtdDirector

Hoko Toowong Pty LtdDirector

Hong Bee Hardware Company, Sdn. BerhadDirector

Hong Leong Enterprises Pte. Ltd.Director

Hong Leong FoundationDirector

Hong Leong Hotel Development LimitedDirector

Hong Leong International Hotel

(Singapore) Pte. Ltd.

Director

Hong Leong Properties Pte. LimitedDirector

Hospitality Holdings Pte. Ltd.Director

Hospitality Ventures Pte. Ltd.Director

Hotel Liverpool LimitedDirector

Hotel Liverpool Management LimitedDirector

HSRE Crosslane (Coventry) LimitedDirector

HSRE Crosslane (Leeds) LimitedDirector

Part L – Eik Sheng Kwek (Director of MCK) (continued)

HSU JV Holdco LimitedDirector

HThree City Jade Pte. Ltd.Director

Iconique Tokutei Mokuteki KaishaDirector

Infinity Properties LimitedDirector

Iselin LimitedDirector

Island Glades Developments Pte. Ltd.Director

Jayland Properties LimitedDirector

Keygate Holdings LimitedDirector

King's Tanglin Shopping Pte. Ltd.Director

Kwek Holdings Pte LtdDirector

Kwek Hong Png Investment Pte. Ltd.Director

Landco Properties LimitedDirector

Le Grove Management Pte LtdDirector

Legend Commercial Pte. Ltd.Director

Legend Commercial Trustee Pte. Ltd.Director

Legend Investment Holdings Pte. Ltd.Director

Legend Quay Pte. Ltd.Director

Lightspark Holdings Limited

(In Members' voluntary liquidation)

Director

Lingo Enterprises LimitedDirector

Lingo Enterprises Limited, Singapore BranchDirector

London Britannia Hotel LimitedDirector

London Tara Hotel LimitedDirector

Lukestone Properties LimitedDirector

M & C (CB) LimitedDirector

M & C (CD) LimitedDirector

M & C Finance (1) LimitedDirector

M & C Management Holdings LimitedDirector

M & C NZ LimitedDirector

M & C Reservations Services LimitedDirector

M&C Asia Finance (UK) LimitedDirector

M&C Asia Holdings (UK) LimitedDirector

M&C Business Trust Management Limited (as

trustee-manager of CDL Hospitality Business Trust

which is stapled together with CDL Hospitality Real

Estate Investment Trust as CDL Hospitality Trusts*)

Director

M&C Capital Pte. Ltd.Director

M&C Galiant Holdings LimitedDirector

M&C Holdings (Thailand) Ltd.Director

M&C Hotel Investments Pte. Ltd.Director

M&C Hotels France Management SARLSenior Manager

M&C Hotels France SASSenior Manager

M&C Hotels Holdings Japan Pte. Ltd.Director

M&C Hotels Holdings LimitedDirector

M&C Hotels Holdings USA LimitedDirector

M&C Hotels Japan Pte. Ltd.Director

M&C New York Finance (UK) LimitedDirector

M&C REIT Management Limited

(as manager of CDL Hospitality Real Estate

Investment Trust which is stapled together

with CDL Hospitality Business Trust as CDL

Hospitality Trusts*)

Director

M&C Restaurants (London) LimitedDirector

M&C Sakura Holdings Pte. Ltd.Director

M&C Sakura Hotel Pte. Ltd.Director

M&C Sakura TMKDirector

M&C Singapore Finance (UK) LimitedDirector

M&C Singapore Holdings (UK) LimitedDirector

M&C Sponsorship LimitedDirector

Marquee Brisbane Hotel Pty LimitedDirector

39
Marquee Brisbane Hotel 2 Pty LimitedDirector

Marquee Hotel Holdings Pty LimitedDirector

Max Office (SKD) General Partner LimitedDirector

Melvale Holdings LimitedDirector

Millennium & Copthorne

(Austrian Holdings) Limited

Director

Millennium & Copthorne (Jersey Holdings) LimitedDirector

Millennium & Copthorne Hotels LimitedDirector

Millennium & Copthorne Hotels Management

(Shanghai) Limited

Director

Millennium & Copthorne International LimitedDirector

Millennium & Copthorne Share Trustees LimitedDirector

Millennium Hotel Holdings EMEA LimitedDirector

Millennium Hotels & Resorts Services LimitedDirector

Millennium Hotels (West London) LimitedDirector

Millennium Hotels (West London) Management

Limited

Director

Millennium Hotels Europe Holdings LimitedDirector

Millennium Hotels Italy Holdings s.r.l.Director

Millennium Hotels LimitedDirector

Millennium Hotels London LimitedDirector

Millennium Hotels Palace Management s.r.l.Director

Millennium Hotels Property s.r.l.Director

Morden Wharf LimitedDirector

Mount V Development Pte. Ltd.

Alternate

Director

MPG St Katharine Finance LimitedDirector

MPG St Katharine GP LimitedDirector

MPG St Katharine LimitedDirector

MPG St Katharine LP LimitedDirector

MPG St Katharine Nominee LimitedDirector

MPG St Katharine Nominee Two LimitedDirector

New Bath Court (Opco) LimitedDirector

New Bath Court LimitedDirector

New Empire Investments Pte. Ltd.Director

New Unity Holdings Ltd.Director

New Vista Realty Pte. Ltd.Director

Newbury Investments Pte LtdDirector

Newmarket Property Holdings LimitedDirector

Northgate Investments LimitedDirector

Novel Developments Pte. Ltd.Director

Palmerston Holdings Sdn. Bhd.Director

Paradise Investments LimitedDirector

Pavo Properties Pte. Ltd.Director

Pinenorth Properties LimitedDirector

Qaiser Holdings LimitedDirector

Queensway Hotel Holdings LimitedDirector

Queensway Hotel LimitedDirector

Rainbow North LimitedDirector

Redvale Developments Pte. Ltd.Director

Redvale Investments Pte. Ltd.Director

Redvale Properties Pte. Ltd.Director

Rehi Normanby Pty LtdDirector

Republic Hotels & Resorts LimitedDirector

Republic Iconic Hotel Pte. Ltd.Director

Republic Plaza City Club (Singapore) Pte LtdDirector

Reselton Properties LimitedDirector

Richmond Hotel Pte LtdDirector

Richview Holdings Pte LtdDirector

Rogo Investments Pte. Ltd.Director

Rogo Realty CorporationDirector

Scentview Holding LimitedDirector

Scottsdale Properties Pte. Ltd.Director

Serangoon Green Pte. Ltd.Director

Siena Commercial Development Pte. Ltd.Director

Siena Residential Development Pte. Ltd.Director

Siena Trustee Pte. Ltd.Director

Silkparc Holdings LimitedDirector

Singapura Developments (Private) LimitedDirector

SKD Marina LimitedDirector

SKIL Four LimitedDirector

SKIL Three LimitedDirector

Sonic Investment Pte. Ltd.Director

South Beach Consortium Pte. Ltd.

Alternate

Director

South Beach International Hotel

Management Pte. Ltd.

Director

Southwaters Investment Pte. Ltd.Director

Sparkland Holdings Pte. Ltd.Director

Summervale Properties Pte. Ltd.Director

Summit Vistas Pte. Ltd.Director

Sunmaster Holdings Pte. Ltd.Director

Sunny Vista Developments Pte. Ltd.Director

Sunshine Plaza Pte LtdDirector

Sycamore House Manco LimitedDirector

Tara Hotels Deutschland GmbH

(In members’ voluntary liquidation)

Director

TC Development Pte. Ltd.Director

The Philippine Fund LimitedDirector

TOSCAP LimitedDirector

Treasure Realm LimitedDirector

Trentwell Management Pte. Ltd.Director

Trentworth Properties LimitedDirector

Ventagrand Holdings Limited

(In members’ voluntary liquidation)

Director

Verwood Holdings Pte. Ltd.Director

Vinemont Investments Pte. Ltd.Director

Welland Investments LimitedDirector

White City Investments LimitedDirector

Whitehall Holdings LimitedDirector

Zatrio Pte LtdDirector

Notes:

1. This information is taken from responses to questionnaires circulated to

the Directors and Senior Managers by MCK after receipt of CDLHH NZ’s

Takeover Notice.

SCHEDULES 1–5

SCHEDULES 1–5

40MILLENNIUM w COPTHORNE HOTELS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED t TARGET COMPANY STATEMENT 2025

4141
APPENDIX:

INDEPENDENT

ADVISER’S REPORT

Left: The Cabana at M Social Auckland.

APPENDIX: INDEPENDENT ADVISER’S REPORT








Statement of Independence

Northington Partners Limited confirms that it:

- Has no conflict of interest that could affect its ability to provide an unbiased report; and

- Has no direct or indirect pecuniary or other interest in the proposed transaction considered in this report,

including any success or contingency fee or remuneration, other than to receive the cash fee for

providing this report.

Northington Partners Limited has satisfied the Takeovers Panel, on the basis of the material provided to the

Panel, that it is independent under the Takeovers Code.

Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New

Zealand Limited

Independent Adviser’s Report

Prepared in relation to the Full Takeover Offer by CDL Hotels Holdings New

Zealand Limited



Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 2

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

1.0 Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................... 4

1.1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ 4

1.2. Summary of the Takeover Offer ................................................................................................................ 4

1.3. Requirements of the Takeovers Code ....................................................................................................... 4

1.4. Basis of Evaluation .................................................................................................................................... 5

1.5. Summary of our Assessment of the Merits of the Offer ............................................................................ 5

1.6. Acceptance or Rejection of the Offer......................................................................................................... 6

2.0 Industry Overview ....................................................................................................................................... 7

2.1. NZ Hotel Sector Overview ......................................................................................................................... 7

2.2. Key Industry Drivers .................................................................................................................................. 7

2.3. Hotel Sector Performance ....................................................................................................................... 10

2.4. Hotel Industry Outlook ............................................................................................................................. 11

2.5. Residential Property Market .................................................................................................................... 12

3.0 Profile of MCK ............................................................................................................................................ 14

3.1. Overview of the Company ....................................................................................................................... 14

3.2. MCK Hotels Portfolio ............................................................................................................................... 14

3.3. CDL Investments ..................................................................................................................................... 16

3.4. Capital Structure and Ownership ............................................................................................................. 17

3.5. Share Price Performance ........................................................................................................................ 17

3.6. Share Liquidity ......................................................................................................................................... 18

3.7. Summary Financial Results ..................................................................................................................... 19

3.8. Market Value of Properties ...................................................................................................................... 22

3.9. Outlook .................................................................................................................................................... 24

4.0 Valuation of MCK ....................................................................................................................................... 26

4.1. Valuation Methodology ............................................................................................................................ 26

4.2. Treatment of Redeemable Preference Shares ........................................................................................ 27

4.3. FY25 Earnings Budget ............................................................................................................................ 28

4.4. Going Concern Value .............................................................................................................................. 29

4.5. Wind-up Value ......................................................................................................................................... 33

4.6. Valuation Conclusion ............................................................................................................................... 35

5.0 Assessment of the Merits of the Offer ..................................................................................................... 36

5.1. Comparison of the Offer Price to our Assessed Value of MCK ............................................................... 36

5.2. Consequences for Minority Shareholders if the Offer is not Successful ................................................. 36

5.3. Outcomes if the Offer is Successful ........................................................................................................ 37

5.4. Ability to Exit at Known Price

................................................................................................................... 37

Appendix 1. Sources of Information Used in this Report ....................................................................... 38

Appendix 2. Declarations, Qualifications and Consents ........................................................................ 39

Appendix 3. MCK Property Portfolio Market Valuation Details .............................................................. 41

Appendix 4. Comparable Companies and Transactions ........................................................................ 42



Cover photo supplied by Millennium & Copthorne Hotels NZ Limited: M Social Hotel Auckland








Statement of Independence

Northington Partners Limited confirms that it:

- Has no conflict of interest that could affect its ability to provide an unbiased report; and

- Has no direct or indirect pecuniary or other interest in the proposed transaction considered in this report,

including any success or contingency fee or remuneration, other than to receive the cash fee for

providing this report.

Northington Partners Limited has satisfied the Takeovers Panel, on the basis of the material provided to the

Panel, that it is independent under the Takeovers Code.

Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New

Zealand Limited

Independent Adviser’s Report

Prepared in relation to the Full Takeover Offer by CDL Hotels Holdings New

Zealand Limited



Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 2

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

1.0 Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................... 4

1.1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ 4

1.2. Summary of the Takeover Offer ................................................................................................................ 4

1.3. Requirements of the Takeovers Code ....................................................................................................... 4

1.4. Basis of Evaluation .................................................................................................................................... 5

1.5. Summary of our Assessment of the Merits of the Offer ............................................................................ 5

1.6. Acceptance or Rejection of the Offer......................................................................................................... 6

2.0 Industry Overview ....................................................................................................................................... 7

2.1. NZ Hotel Sector Overview ......................................................................................................................... 7

2.2. Key Industry Drivers .................................................................................................................................. 7

2.3. Hotel Sector Performance ....................................................................................................................... 10

2.4. Hotel Industry Outlook ............................................................................................................................. 11

2.5. Residential Property Market .................................................................................................................... 12

3.0 Profile of MCK ............................................................................................................................................ 14

3.1. Overview of the Company ....................................................................................................................... 14

3.2. MCK Hotels Portfolio ............................................................................................................................... 14

3.3. CDL Investments ..................................................................................................................................... 16

3.4. Capital Structure and Ownership ............................................................................................................. 17

3.5. Share Price Performance ........................................................................................................................ 17

3.6. Share Liquidity ......................................................................................................................................... 18

3.7. Summary Financial Results ..................................................................................................................... 19

3.8. Market Value of Properties ...................................................................................................................... 22

3.9. Outlook .................................................................................................................................................... 24

4.0 Valuation of MCK ....................................................................................................................................... 26

4.1. Valuation Methodology ............................................................................................................................ 26

4.2. Treatment of Redeemable Preference Shares ........................................................................................ 27

4.3. FY25 Earnings Budget ............................................................................................................................ 28

4.4. Going Concern Value .............................................................................................................................. 29

4.5. Wind-up Value ......................................................................................................................................... 33

4.6. Valuation Conclusion ............................................................................................................................... 35

5.0 Assessment of the Merits of the Offer ..................................................................................................... 36

5.1. Comparison of the Offer Price to our Assessed Value of MCK ............................................................... 36

5.2. Consequences for Minority Shareholders if the Offer is not Successful ................................................. 36

5.3. Outcomes if the Offer is Successful ........................................................................................................ 37

5.4. Ability to Exit at Known Price ................................................................................................................... 37

Appendix 1. Sources of Information Used in this Report .......................................................................

38

Appendix 2. Declarations, Qualifications and Consents ........................................................................ 39

Appendix 3. MCK Property Portfolio Market Valuation Details .............................................................. 41

Appendix 4. Comparable Companies and Transactions ........................................................................ 42



Cover photo supplied by Millennium & Copthorne Hotels NZ Limited: M Social Hotel Auckland


APPENDIX: INDEPENDENT ADVISER’S REPORT

Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 3
Table of Contents

Abbreviations and Definitions

ADR Average Daily Rate

CDI CDL Investments New Zealand Limited

CDL CDL Hotels Holdings New Zealand Limited, a subsidiary of CDL Singapore

Stock Exchange listed City Developments Limited

Code The Takeovers Code

Company MCK

EV Enterprise Value

FY In relation to MCK, financial year ending 31 December

IAR This independent adviser report prepared by Northington Partners

MCK Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited

NAV Net asset value per share

NCI Non-controlling interests

Non-associated Shareholders Shareholders who are neither the Offeror nor Associates of the Offeror

Northington Partners Northington Partners Limited

NZ Hotels MCK’s owned and operated hotels in New Zealand as well as franchised

hotels

NZX NZX Limited

Offer The offer to purchase all of the fully paid ordinary shares in MCK not already

held by the Offeror, at NZ$2.25, dated 10 February 2025

Offeror CDL

RevPAR Revenue per available room

RPS Redeemable Preference Shares

Sofitel Brisbane JV 50% shareholding in Marquee Hotel Holdings Pty Limited, which owns the

Sofitel Brisbane Central Hotel

Surplus Land MCK’s surplus land adjacent to four hotels (Queenstown, Te Anau,

Palmerston North and Rotorua) and a land site acquired in Whangarei in 2024

for a future hotel development

Sydney Apartments Unsold residential units, commercial suites, carspaces and storage cages at

the Zenith Residences apartment complex located at 82-94 Darlinghurst Road

Potts Point NSW 2011, Australia

VWAP Volume-Weighted Average Price



Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 4

Executive Summary

1.0 Executive Summary

1.1. Introduction

Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited (“MCK” or the “Company”) is an NZX-listed

hotel owner and operator. MCK operates 19 hotels based in New Zealand under the Millennium,

Grand Millennium, M Social, Copthorne and Kingsgate brands. MCK is also the majority 65.3%

shareholder in NZX-listed commercial and residential property developer CDL Investments New

Zealand Limited (“CDI”) and has property interests in Australia including apartments in Sydney and a

50% ownership interest in the Sofitel Brisbane Central.

CDL Hotels Holdings New Zealand Limited ("CDL" or the “Offeror”) is MCK’s majority shareholder,

currently owning 75.86% of the ordinary shares on issue. On 20 January 2025, CDL gave notice of its

intention to make a full takeover offer for all of the fully paid ordinary shares in MCK not already held

by CDL (the “Offer”). The price for MCK shares under the Offer was set at $2.25 per share (“Offer

Price”), with the Offer open for acceptances until 5:00pm on 8 May 2025 (unless extended in

accordance with the Code).

MCK has also issued approximately 52 million redeemable preference shares which are listed on the

NZX Main Board (the “RPS”). The RPS are not covered under the Code and are accordingly not

included in the Offer. As such, this report does not provide a view on the value of the RPS.

1.2. Summary of the Takeover Offer

The key terms of the Offer are summarised as follows:

- The Offer is to acquire the 24.14% of ordinary MCK shares that CDL does not already own at

a cash price of NZ$2.25 per share;

- The Offer opened for acceptances on 10 February 2025 and will close at 5:00pm on 8 May

2025 (unless it is extended in accordance with the Code);

- The Offer is subject to several conditions (which can be waived, in whole or part, by CDL at

its discretion), including:

• that CDL receives acceptances which will result in it holding or controlling 90% or

more of the voting rights in MCK (“Minimum Acceptance Condition”);

• CDL obtains consent under the Overseas Investment Act 2005 and the Overseas

Investment Regulations 2005; and

• that a range of certain events or circumstances have not occurred at the time the

Offer is declared unconditional.

The latest date that the Offer can be declared unconditional is 6 June 2025 (unless the Offer

is extended prior); and

- Payment for the shares will be made in cash no later than five working days after the later of

the date on which the Offer acceptance is received, the date on which the Offer is declared

unconditional, or the initial Offer closing date.

1.3. Requirements of the Takeovers Code

MCK is a “Code Company” for the purposes of the Code. The Offer and the Company’s response to

the Offer must therefore comply with the provisions set out in the Code.

Rule 21 of the Code requires that the directors of MCK must obtain a report from an independent

adviser on the merits of the Offer. The Company’s Independent Directors requested Northington

Partners Limited (“Northington Partners”) to prepare the independent adviser’s report required by

Rule 21 of the Code, and our appointment was subsequently approved by the Takeovers Panel.

Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 3
Table of Contents

Abbreviations and Definitions

ADR Average Daily Rate

CDI CDL Investments New Zealand Limited

CDL CDL Hotels Holdings New Zealand Limited, a subsidiary of CDL Singapore

Stock Exchange listed City Developments Limited

Code The Takeovers Code

Company MCK

EV Enterprise Value

FY In relation to MCK, financial year ending 31 December

IAR This independent adviser report prepared by Northington Partners

MCK Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited

NAV Net asset value per share

NCI Non-controlling interests

Non-associated Shareholders Shareholders who are neither the Offeror nor Associates of the Offeror

Northington Partners Northington Partners Limited

NZ Hotels MCK’s owned and operated hotels in New Zealand as well as franchised

hotels

NZX NZX Limited

Offer The offer to purchase all of the fully paid ordinary shares in MCK not already

held by the Offeror, at NZ$2.25, dated 10 February 2025

Offeror CDL

RevPAR Revenue per available room

RPS Redeemable Preference Shares

Sofitel Brisbane JV 50% shareholding in Marquee Hotel Holdings Pty Limited, which owns the

Sofitel Brisbane Central Hotel

Surplus Land MCK’s surplus land adjacent to four hotels (Queenstown, Te Anau,

Palmerston North and Rotorua) and a land site acquired in Whangarei in 2024

for a future hotel development

Sydney Apartments Unsold residential units, commercial suites, carspaces and storage cages at

the Zenith Residences apartment complex located at 82-94 Darlinghurst Road

Potts Point NSW 2011, Australia

VWAP Volume-Weighted Average Price



Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 4

Executive Summary

1.0 Executive Summary

1.1. Introduction

Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited (“MCK” or the “Company”) is an NZX-listed

hotel owner and operator. MCK operates 19 hotels based in New Zealand under the Millennium,

Grand Millennium, M Social, Copthorne and Kingsgate brands. MCK is also the majority 65.3%

shareholder in NZX-listed commercial and residential property developer CDL Investments New

Zealand Limited (“CDI”) and has property interests in Australia including apartments in Sydney and a

50% ownership interest in the Sofitel Brisbane Central.

CDL Hotels Holdings New Zealand Limited ("CDL" or the “Offeror”) is MCK’s majority shareholder,

currently owning 75.86% of the ordinary shares on issue. On 20 January 2025, CDL gave notice of its

intention to make a full takeover offer for all of the fully paid ordinary shares in MCK not already held

by CDL (the “Offer”). The price for MCK shares under the Offer was set at $2.25 per share (“Offer

Price”), with the Offer open for acceptances until 5:00pm on 8 May 2025 (unless extended in

accordance with the Code).

MCK has also issued approximately 52 million redeemable preference shares which are listed on the

NZX Main Board (the “RPS”). The RPS are not covered under the Code and are accordingly not

included in the Offer. As such, this report does not provide a view on the value of the RPS.

1.2. Summary of the Takeover Offer

The key terms of the Offer are summarised as follows:

- The Offer is to acquire the 24.14% of ordinary MCK shares that CDL does not already own at

a cash price of NZ$2.25 per share;

- The Offer opened for acceptances on 10 February 2025 and will close at 5:00pm on 8 May

2025 (unless it is extended in accordance with the Code);

- The Offer is subject to several conditions (which can be waived, in whole or part, by CDL at

its discretion), including:

• that CDL receives acceptances which will result in it holding or controlling 90% or

more of the voting rights in MCK (“Minimum Acceptance Condition”);

• CDL obtains consent under the Overseas Investment Act 2005 and the Overseas

Investment Regulations 2005; and

• that a range of certain events or circumstances have not occurred at the time the

Offer is declared unconditional.

The latest date that the Offer can be declared unconditional is 6 June 2025 (unless the Offer

is extended prior); and

- Payment for the shares will be made in cash no later than five working days after the later of

the date on which the Offer acceptance is received, the date on which the Offer is declared

unconditional, or the initial Offer closing date.

1.3. Requirements of the Takeovers Code

MCK is a “Code Company” for the purposes of the Code. The Offer and the Company’s response to

the Offer must therefore comply with the provisions set out in the Code.

Rule 21 of the Code requires that the directors of MCK must obtain a report from an independent

adviser on the merits of the Offer. The Company’s Independent Directors requested Northington

Partners Limited (“Northington Partners”) to prepare the independent adviser’s report required by

Rule 21 of the Code, and our appointment was subsequently approved by the Takeovers Panel.

APPENDIX: INDEPENDENT ADVISER’S REPORT

Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 5
Executive Summary

This report will accompany the Target Company Statement to be sent to all MCK shareholders and

sets out our opinion on the merits of the Offer. This report should not be used for any other purpose

and should be read in conjunction with the declarations, qualifications and consents set out in

Appendix 2.

1.4. Basis of Evaluation

The exact meaning of the word “merits” is not prescribed in the Code and there is no well accepted,

authoritative New Zealand reference that clearly establishes what should be considered when

assessing the merits of a takeover offer. Although the Takeovers Panel has published a guidance

note about the role of an Independent Adviser, it has been careful not to limit the scope of the

assessment and states that the relevant factors which should be taken into consideration will depend

on the features of the proposed transaction as well as the prevailing circumstances of the parties

involved. However, the Takeovers Panel suggests that a merits assessment is broader than a

valuation assessment and will include other positive and negative aspects of a transaction.

We have assessed the merits of the Offer by taking into account the following factors:

- Our estimate of the underlying value range for 100% of the ordinary shares in MCK;

- A comparison of our estimated value range to the Offer Price;

- The prospects, attractiveness and risk profile of the Company;

- The current level of liquidity for MCK’s shares and other potential opportunities that shareholders

may have to sell shares in the future; and

- Any other advantages or disadvantages for MCK shareholders of accepting or rejecting the Offer.

1.5. Summary of our Assessment of the Merits of the Offer

Our full assessment of the merits of the Offer for MCK’s shareholders is set out in Section 5.0. A

summary is presented below in Table 1.

Table 1: Summary of Merits of the Offer

Item Key Conclusions Further

Information

Value of the

Offer

- We have valued 100% of the equity in MCK in a range between

$696.2 million and $791.1 million, which corresponds to a value of

$4.40 to $5.00 per share. This is based on our assessment of the fair

market value of MCK both as a going concern and via the potential

orderly realisation of assets through a wind-up and liquidation of the

Company.

- As shown below in Figure 1, the mid-point of our assessed value

range ($4.70 per share) is more than double the Offer Price of $2.25.

Even allowing for a reasonable margin of error in relation to our

valuation, we conclude that the Offer significantly undervalues the

Company.

Figure 1: Comparison of Offer Price to Assessed Value Range


Sources: Northington Partners; NZX; Offer.

1

NZX traded price represents the VWAP

of ordinary shares during the 20 days prior to the Offer announcement.

Sections 4

and 5

$4.40

$5.00

$4.70

$1.75

$2.25

$-

$1.00

$2.00

$3.00

$4.00

$5.00

$6.00

$7.00

LowHighMidTraded

Price

(NZX)

Offer

Price

1

Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 6

Executive Summary

Item Key Conclusions Further

Information

- Our valuation range excludes potential synergy and strategic benefits

from 100% ownership of MCK. These are expected to be material and

provide additional value benefit to CDL.


Consequences

for Minority

Shareholders if

the Offer is not

Successful

- If the Offer conditions are not fully satisfied or waived by CDL, the

Offer will lapse and MCK will continue to operate in its current form.

Key consequences for minority shareholders under this scenario

include the following:

o CDL has stated its intention is to make no significant changes to

the business or its strategy. That includes evaluating “business

decisions using criteria that are oriented towards long-term

sustainability”, which we interpret to mean that distributions

would remain at the current low level.

o We expect that the low level of liquidity for MCK shares would

continue and minority shareholders will have limited ability to sell

their MCK shares on market for the foreseeable future.

o The MCK shares are likely to continue to trade at a significant

discount to our assessed value range because of the lack of

liquidity and ongoing minority discount attributed to small share

parcels.

- However, in the event that this Offer is unsuccessful, we believe that

CDL will remain motivated to reach the 90% ownership level needed to

utilise the compulsory acquisition provisions of the Code. One of those

options is to make a further takeover offer at a higher price (or to

increase the price for the current Offer, pursuant to the terms of the

Code).

Section 5

Other

Considerations

in Respect of

the Offer

- In our view, the likelihood of an alternative takeover offer emerging for

MCK from a party other than CDL is extremely low. As CDL already

controls 75.9% of the voting rights in the Company, any alternative

takeover offer would require CDL’s support.

- Because there is no certainty that CDL will make a new offer (or

improve the price under the current Offer), some shareholders may

see the Offer as an opportunity to fully exit their investment in MCK at

a known price (without brokerage costs).

- As discussed above, MCK shares are highly illiquid and will remain so

if the Offer is unsuccessful. Given the uncertainties relating to the

share price and market liquidity after the Offer has closed, some

shareholders may accept a price lower than the perceived value of the

shares in return for a certain exit.

Section 5

1.6. Acceptance or Rejection of the Offer

This report represents one source of information that MCK shareholders may wish to consider when

forming their own view on whether to accept or reject the Offer. It is not possible to contemplate all

shareholders’ personal circumstances or investment objectives and our assessment is therefore

general in nature. The appropriate course of action for each shareholder is dependent on their own

unique situation. If appropriate, shareholders should consult their own professional adviser(s).

Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 5
Executive Summary

This report will accompany the Target Company Statement to be sent to all MCK shareholders and

sets out our opinion on the merits of the Offer. This report should not be used for any other purpose

and should be read in conjunction with the declarations, qualifications and consents set out in

Appendix 2.

1.4. Basis of Evaluation

The exact meaning of the word “merits” is not prescribed in the Code and there is no well accepted,

authoritative New Zealand reference that clearly establishes what should be considered when

assessing the merits of a takeover offer. Although the Takeovers Panel has published a guidance

note about the role of an Independent Adviser, it has been careful not to limit the scope of the

assessment and states that the relevant factors which should be taken into consideration will depend

on the features of the proposed transaction as well as the prevailing circumstances of the parties

involved. However, the Takeovers Panel suggests that a merits assessment is broader than a

valuation assessment and will include other positive and negative aspects of a transaction.

We have assessed the merits of the Offer by taking into account the following factors:

- Our estimate of the underlying value range for 100% of the ordinary shares in MCK;

- A comparison of our estimated value range to the Offer Price;

- The prospects, attractiveness and risk profile of the Company;

- The current level of liquidity for MCK’s shares and other potential opportunities that shareholders

may have to sell shares in the future; and

- Any other advantages or disadvantages for MCK shareholders of accepting or rejecting the Offer.

1.5. Summary of our Assessment of the Merits of the Offer

Our full assessment of the merits of the Offer for MCK’s shareholders is set out in Section 5.0. A

summary is presented below in Table 1.

Table 1: Summary of Merits of the Offer

Item Key Conclusions Further

Information

Value of the

Offer

- We have valued 100% of the equity in MCK in a range between

$696.2 million and $791.1 million, which corresponds to a value of

$4.40 to $5.00 per share. This is based on our assessment of the fair

market value of MCK both as a going concern and via the potential

orderly realisation of assets through a wind-up and liquidation of the

Company.

- As shown below in Figure 1, the mid-point of our assessed value

range ($4.70 per share) is more than double the Offer Price of $2.25.

Even allowing for a reasonable margin of error in relation to our

valuation, we conclude that the Offer significantly undervalues the

Company.

Figure 1: Comparison of Offer Price to Assessed Value Range


Sources: Northington Partners; NZX; Offer.

1

NZX traded price represents the VWAP

of ordinary shares during the 20 days prior to the Offer announcement.

Sections 4

and 5

$4.40

$5.00

$4.70

$1.75

$2.25

$-

$1.00

$2.00

$3.00

$4.00

$5.00

$6.00

$7.00

LowHighMidTraded

Price

(NZX)

Offer

Price

1

Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 6

Executive Summary

Item Key Conclusions Further

Information

- Our valuation range excludes potential synergy and strategic benefits

from 100% ownership of MCK. These are expected to be material and

provide additional value benefit to CDL.


Consequences

for Minority

Shareholders if

the Offer is not

Successful

- If the Offer conditions are not fully satisfied or waived by CDL, the

Offer will lapse and MCK will continue to operate in its current form.

Key consequences for minority shareholders under this scenario

include the following:

o CDL has stated its intention is to make no significant changes to

the business or its strategy. That includes evaluating “business

decisions using criteria that are oriented towards long-term

sustainability”, which we interpret to mean that distributions

would remain at the current low level.

o We expect that the low level of liquidity for MCK shares would

continue and minority shareholders will have limited ability to sell

their MCK shares on market for the foreseeable future.

o The MCK shares are likely to continue to trade at a significant

discount to our assessed value range because of the lack of

liquidity and ongoing minority discount attributed to small share

parcels.

- However, in the event that this Offer is unsuccessful, we believe that

CDL will remain motivated to reach the 90% ownership level needed to

utilise the compulsory acquisition provisions of the Code. One of those

options is to make a further takeover offer at a higher price (or to

increase the price for the current Offer, pursuant to the terms of the

Code).

Section 5

Other

Considerations

in Respect of

the Offer

- In our view, the likelihood of an alternative takeover offer emerging for

MCK from a party other than CDL is extremely low. As CDL already

controls 75.9% of the voting rights in the Company, any alternative

takeover offer would require CDL’s support.

- Because there is no certainty that CDL will make a new offer (or

improve the price under the current Offer), some shareholders may

see the Offer as an opportunity to fully exit their investment in MCK at

a known price (without brokerage costs).

- As discussed above, MCK shares are highly illiquid and will remain so

if the Offer is unsuccessful. Given the uncertainties relating to the

share price and market liquidity after the Offer has closed, some

shareholders may accept a price lower than the perceived value of the

shares in return for a certain exit.

Section 5

1.6. Acceptance or Rejection of the Offer

This report represents one source of information that MCK shareholders may wish to consider when

forming their own view on whether to accept or reject the Offer. It is not possible to contemplate all

shareholders’ personal circumstances or investment objectives and our assessment is therefore

general in nature. The appropriate course of action for each shareholder is dependent on their own

unique situation. If appropriate, shareholders should consult their own professional adviser(s).


APPENDIX: INDEPENDENT ADVISER’S REPORT

Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 7
Industry Overview

2.0 Industry Overview

2.1. NZ Hotel Sector Overview

New Zealand’s accommodation sector is made up of hotels, motels, backpackers, non-traditional

accommodation (home sharing / AirBnb), and holiday parks and campgrounds. MCK only participates

in the hotel sector. The New Zealand hotel sector predominantly serves both domestic and international

travellers, travelling for either tourism or business purposes.

Within the hotel sector, New Zealand has an inventory of approximately 35,000 hotel rooms. Table 2

below details the 10 largest hotel chains in New Zealand as of July 2023 and highlights that MCK is the

second largest operator in the sector (at that time).

Table 2: New Zealand Hotel Market Share by Operator (by Number of Rooms as of July 2023)

Rank Operator Rooms Estimated Market Share %

1 Accor 5,641 16.0%

2 MCK 2,396 6.8%

3 IHG Hotels & Resorts 2,161 6.1%

4 Ascott International Management 1,845 5.2%

5 EVT Hospitality & Entertainment 1,879 5.3%

6 Scenic Hotel Group 1,422 4.0%

7 Distinction Hotels 1,345 3.8%

8 Wyndham Hotels & Resorts 1,359 3.9%

9 Sudima Hotels 1,153 3.3%

10 Hilton Worldwide 1,039 2.9%

Source: Horwath HTL. Operator rooms by chain group (including managed and franchised) as of the assessed date (July 2023).

Current room numbers may differ.

Hotel operators in New Zealand include major global chains such as Accor and Hilton which

predominantly operate in major urban centres, catering to international and corporate travellers.

Alongside these, domestic hotel chains (such as Scenic, Distinction, and Sudima) serve a wider range

of regions including secondary cities and popular tourist destinations, offering accommodation tailored

to local demand. Additionally, a diverse network of smaller independent hotels provides unique,

boutique or budget-friendly options.

More than half of the hotels in New Zealand have fewer than 50 rooms

1

. Approximately 80% of these

smaller hotels are unbranded with independent operators. Branded operators tend to operate larger

hotels and although they represent a smaller portion of hotels by number, they supply approximately

two thirds of the available room supply with an average room size of over 100 rooms per property.

Given the prevalence of small properties, many international brands seek out affiliations, franchise

agreements or management opportunities with existing hotels. MCK is relatively unique in New Zealand

because it generally owns and manages the hotels within its portfolio of brands.

2.2. Key Industry Drivers

The hotel sector serves both domestic and international travellers. With a relatively small population of

~5.2 million people, the performance of the New Zealand hotel sector is highly dependent on

international visitor arrivals. Historically, international travellers contributed circa 50% of New Zealand’s

total hotel room nights.


1

Horwath HTL Hotels & Chains Report 2023

Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 8

Industry Overview

As shown in Figure 2, the Covid-19 pandemic severely impacted travel to New Zealand. International

visitor numbers have since recovered but are yet to reach pre-pandemic levels of ~3.9m arrivals that

were achieved in 2019.

Figure 2: New Zealand International Visitor Arrivals (000s per month)

Source: StatsNZ Visitor Arrivals.

Whilst international visitor numbers have recovered to ~84% of their pre-pandemic levels, this has

largely been driven by a strong recovery of those visiting friends and family. The recovery in the key

hotel related markets of tourism and business has been slower, at circa 79% and 61% respectively as

demonstrated in the subsequent sections below.

2.2.1. International Visitors by Country

Figure 3 provides a summary of international visitor arrivals into New Zealand by country of origin for

the 2016 – 2019 period (broadly pre-Covid) and the subsequent period to the end of 2024.

Figure 3: International Visitor Arrivals – Country of Residence (000s per annum)

Source: StatsNZ Visitor Arrivals.

Australia is by far New Zealand’s most significant source of international arrivals with approximately

1.5m arrivals in 2019 (40% of total arrivals). The 2024 arrivals from Australia have recovered to ~88%

of 2019 levels and remains New Zealand’s key inbound tourism market. Australians have historically

visited for holiday purposes (~40%), to visit friends or family (~40%), or for business purposes (~10%).

Other key markets include the USA, China, Asia (ex-China) and Europe:

− Visitors from the USA have recovered to near pre-pandemic levels, although business travel

from the USA remains 35% down.

− China’s prolonged pandemic response and slow easing of travel restrictions served to delay the

recovery in Chinese tourist numbers. Globally, Chinese tourist activity remains ~15% down on

pre-pandemic levels, but the recovery to travel to New Zealand has been slower with arrivals

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

Jan-15Jan-16Jan-17Jan-18Jan-19Jan-20Jan-21Jan-22Jan-23Jan-24

Vistor ArrivalsSeasonally Adjusted

1,409

1,472

1,495

1,538

360

160

829

1,258

1,358

3,494

3,723

3,858

3,888

996

207

1,434

2,957

3,263

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

4,000

4,500

201620172018201920202021202220232024

USAAmericas less USAOceania less AusOtherAustraliaChinaAsia less ChinaEurope

Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 7
Industry Overview

2.0 Industry Overview

2.1. NZ Hotel Sector Overview

New Zealand’s accommodation sector is made up of hotels, motels, backpackers, non-traditional

accommodation (home sharing / AirBnb), and holiday parks and campgrounds. MCK only participates

in the hotel sector. The New Zealand hotel sector predominantly serves both domestic and international

travellers, travelling for either tourism or business purposes.

Within the hotel sector, New Zealand has an inventory of approximately 35,000 hotel rooms. Table 2

below details the 10 largest hotel chains in New Zealand as of July 2023 and highlights that MCK is the

second largest operator in the sector (at that time).

Table 2: New Zealand Hotel Market Share by Operator (by Number of Rooms as of July 2023)

Rank Operator Rooms Estimated Market Share %

1 Accor 5,641 16.0%

2 MCK 2,396 6.8%

3 IHG Hotels & Resorts 2,161 6.1%

4 Ascott International Management 1,845 5.2%

5 EVT Hospitality & Entertainment 1,879 5.3%

6 Scenic Hotel Group 1,422 4.0%

7 Distinction Hotels 1,345 3.8%

8 Wyndham Hotels & Resorts 1,359 3.9%

9 Sudima Hotels 1,153 3.3%

10 Hilton Worldwide 1,039 2.9%

Source: Horwath HTL. Operator rooms by chain group (including managed and franchised) as of the assessed date (July 2023).

Current room numbers may differ.

Hotel operators in New Zealand include major global chains such as Accor and Hilton which

predominantly operate in major urban centres, catering to international and corporate travellers.

Alongside these, domestic hotel chains (such as Scenic, Distinction, and Sudima) serve a wider range

of regions including secondary cities and popular tourist destinations, offering accommodation tailored

to local demand. Additionally, a diverse network of smaller independent hotels provides unique,

boutique or budget-friendly options.

More than half of the hotels in New Zealand have fewer than 50 rooms

1

. Approximately 80% of these

smaller hotels are unbranded with independent operators. Branded operators tend to operate larger

hotels and although they represent a smaller portion of hotels by number, they supply approximately

two thirds of the available room supply with an average room size of over 100 rooms per property.

Given the prevalence of small properties, many international brands seek out affiliations, franchise

agreements or management opportunities with existing hotels. MCK is relatively unique in New Zealand

because it generally owns and manages the hotels within its portfolio of brands.

2.2. Key Industry Drivers

The hotel sector serves both domestic and international travellers. With a relatively small population of

~5.2 million people, the performance of the New Zealand hotel sector is highly dependent on

international visitor arrivals. Historically, international travellers contributed circa 50% of New Zealand’s

total hotel room nights.


1

Horwath HTL Hotels & Chains Report 2023

Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 8

Industry Overview

As shown in Figure 2, the Covid-19 pandemic severely impacted travel to New Zealand. International

visitor numbers have since recovered but are yet to reach pre-pandemic levels of ~3.9m arrivals that

were achieved in 2019.

Figure 2: New Zealand International Visitor Arrivals (000s per month)

Source: StatsNZ Visitor Arrivals.

Whilst international visitor numbers have recovered to ~84% of their pre-pandemic levels, this has

largely been driven by a strong recovery of those visiting friends and family. The recovery in the key

hotel related markets of tourism and business has been slower, at circa 79% and 61% respectively as

demonstrated in the subsequent sections below.

2.2.1. International Visitors by Country

Figure 3 provides a summary of international visitor arrivals into New Zealand by country of origin for

the 2016 – 2019 period (broadly pre-Covid) and the subsequent period to the end of 2024.

Figure 3: International Visitor Arrivals – Country of Residence (000s per annum)

Source: StatsNZ Visitor Arrivals.

Australia is by far New Zealand’s most significant source of international arrivals with approximately

1.5m arrivals in 2019 (40% of total arrivals). The 2024 arrivals from Australia have recovered to ~88%

of 2019 levels and remains New Zealand’s key inbound tourism market. Australians have historically

visited for holiday purposes (~40%), to visit friends or family (~40%), or for business purposes (~10%).

Other key markets include the USA, China, Asia (ex-China) and Europe:

− Visitors from the USA have recovered to near pre-pandemic levels, although business travel

from the USA remains 35% down.

− China’s prolonged pandemic response and slow easing of travel restrictions served to delay the

recovery in Chinese tourist numbers. Globally, Chinese tourist activity remains ~15% down on

pre-pandemic levels, but the recovery to travel to New Zealand has been slower with arrivals

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

Jan-15Jan-16Jan-17Jan-18Jan-19Jan-20Jan-21Jan-22Jan-23Jan-24

Vistor ArrivalsSeasonally Adjusted

1,409

1,472

1,495

1,538

360

160

829

1,258

1,358

3,494

3,723

3,858

3,888

996

207

1,434

2,957

3,263

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

4,000

4,500

201620172018201920202021202220232024

USAAmericas less USAOceania less AusOtherAustraliaChinaAsia less ChinaEurope

APPENDIX: INDEPENDENT ADVISER’S REPORT

Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 9
Industry Overview

still ~28% below pre-pandemic levels. This is due in part to the pandemic’s impact on

household savings and depreciation of the yuan, leading Chinese travellers to seek out more

budget friendly travel destinations.

− European visitors are down by 140k per annum (25%) compared to pre-pandemic levels. This

is driven by a 85k (28%) reduction in the number of holiday makers and a 20k (45%) reduction

in the number of business travellers.

2.2.2. International Visitors by Purpose

Figure 4 provides a summary of international visitor arrivals into New Zealand by purpose of travel.

Figure 4: International Visitor Arrivals – Purpose of Travel (000s per annum)


Source: StatsNZ Visitor Arrivals.

Tourism travel (holiday/vacation) has historically made up over 50% of international arrivals to New

Zealand but was still slightly lower in 2024 (~48%) and remains ~400k (21%) below pre-pandemic

levels. This reduction is observed across all of New Zealand’s main tourism markets, with the largest

(46%) reduction observed in tourists arriving from China, whilst tourists from Australia and the USA

have largely recovered to be only marginally below pre-pandemic levels.

The reduction in New Zealand tourism activity is at odds with the global tourism market where 2024

global tourism travel was 99% of pre-pandemic levels

2

. This is believed to be due to the significant

increase in travel costs since the pandemic, with tourists becoming more cost-conscious and actively

seeking better value for money. As a high-cost destination and due to the long-travel distances, New

Zealand has faced more headwinds than other international destinations. This has been exacerbated

by staffing issues driven by a tight labour market and a delay in rebuilding the workforce that historically

included many young people holding working holiday visas.

Another major contributor to international arrivals include those visiting for family reasons (~31% of

2024 arrivals). This category has been more immune to Covid-19 compared to business-related and

tourist travel.

2.2.3. Domestic Travellers

Hotel demand from domestic travellers is driven primarily by business travel, leisure and entertainment,

and to a lesser extent, domestic tourism. All of these factors have been impacted by broader domestic

economic conditions and consumer confidence.

Domestic travel experienced a sharp rebound immediately post-pandemic as consumer and business

spending increased, driven by rising wages, pent-up demand, limited international travel opportunities,

strong consumer confidence, and government wage subsidies and broader spending. With borders


2

United Nations World Tourism Organisation – Dec 2024

1,817

1,953

2,021

1,972

515

32

500

1,323

1,564

1,021

1,075

1,098

1,077

289

120

631

976

1,012

3,494

3,723

3,858

3,888

996

207

1,434

2,957

3,263

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

4,000

4,500

201620172018201920202021202220232024

Holiday/VacationBusinessConventions/Conferences

EducationUnspecified/Not CollectedOther

Visit Friends/Relatives

Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 10

Industry Overview

closed, New Zealanders redirected discretionary spending toward domestic tourism, providing a

temporary boost to the sector.

However, this momentum was short-lived as several economic headwinds emerged. As the New

Zealand economy entered a period of slower growth, rising interest rates and higher inflation, business

activity weakened and consumer disposable income levels reduced. This has led to a decline in

corporate travel as companies cut costs and scaled back discretionary spending. Anecdotal evidence

also suggests there may have been a permanent shift in business travel behaviours as the pandemic

transformed the way people work online with less requirement to travel.

Domestic tourism travel has been impacted by the rising cost pressures resulting in reduced or

downgraded travel plans. The re-opening of overseas travel has also resulted in travellers bypassing

New Zealand in favour of holidaying overseas.

While the post-pandemic tourism and economic impacts have largely stabilized, we understand that

domestic travel demand remains significantly lower than during the immediate post-pandemic peak,

and modestly lower than pre-pandemic levels.

2.3. Hotel Sector Performance

Key performance drivers for the hotel sector include hotel occupancy levels (relative to available rooms)

and revenue per bed, usually measured by average daily rate (“ADR”) and revenue per available room

(“RevPAR”) metrics. RevPAR is effectively the same as ADR but reflects overall occupancy levels (i.e.

for a hotel with 100% occupancy, ADR and RevPAR are equal).

Together, the early rebound in domestic travel and the gradual recovery in international travel is

reflected in the total hotel guest nights as shown in Figure 5. Despite international visitor numbers being

down on pre-pandemic levels, hotel guest nights peaked at levels higher than pre-pandemic in late

2023. The continued recovery in international visitors through 2024 replaced the small decrease in

guest nights from domestic travellers and is expected to contribute to increased hotel demand over

2025.

Figure 5: Hotel Guest Nights (000s per month)


Sources: StatsNZ Accommodation Survey (to September 2019), MBIE Accommodation Data Programme (from June 2020).

Improved guest night demand has increased hotel occupancy levels and is a key factor in driving ADRs

and RevPARs as well as supporting the sector in building more rooms (where the demand driven

response is to increase pricing or availability of rooms, including reopening of rooms which may have

been refurbished or closed during the pandemic).

Figure 6 below demonstrates the level of available rooms and hotel occupancy across the New Zealand

hotel sector from 2016 to 2024. This shows that the level of available rooms dropped by approximately

5,000 due to Covid-19 but has since recovered to 2019 levels supported by increasing demand for

rooms. Most of the increased supply has been in the main tourism sectors of Auckland, Queenstown

and Christchurch. Occupancy levels have also increased from as low as ~20% in September 2021 to

~80% in December 2024.

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1,400

1,600

201620172018201920202021202220232024

Total guest nights Domestic guest nights International guest nights

Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 9
Industry Overview

still ~28% below pre-pandemic levels. This is due in part to the pandemic’s impact on

household savings and depreciation of the yuan, leading Chinese travellers to seek out more

budget friendly travel destinations.

− European visitors are down by 140k per annum (25%) compared to pre-pandemic levels. This

is driven by a 85k (28%) reduction in the number of holiday makers and a 20k (45%) reduction

in the number of business travellers.

2.2.2. International Visitors by Purpose

Figure 4 provides a summary of international visitor arrivals into New Zealand by purpose of travel.

Figure 4: International Visitor Arrivals – Purpose of Travel (000s per annum)


Source: StatsNZ Visitor Arrivals.

Tourism travel (holiday/vacation) has historically made up over 50% of international arrivals to New

Zealand but was still slightly lower in 2024 (~48%) and remains ~400k (21%) below pre-pandemic

levels. This reduction is observed across all of New Zealand’s main tourism markets, with the largest

(46%) reduction observed in tourists arriving from China, whilst tourists from Australia and the USA

have largely recovered to be only marginally below pre-pandemic levels.

The reduction in New Zealand tourism activity is at odds with the global tourism market where 2024

global tourism travel was 99% of pre-pandemic levels

2

. This is believed to be due to the significant

increase in travel costs since the pandemic, with tourists becoming more cost-conscious and actively

seeking better value for money. As a high-cost destination and due to the long-travel distances, New

Zealand has faced more headwinds than other international destinations. This has been exacerbated

by staffing issues driven by a tight labour market and a delay in rebuilding the workforce that historically

included many young people holding working holiday visas.

Another major contributor to international arrivals include those visiting for family reasons (~31% of

2024 arrivals). This category has been more immune to Covid-19 compared to business-related and

tourist travel.

2.2.3. Domestic Travellers

Hotel demand from domestic travellers is driven primarily by business travel, leisure and entertainment,

and to a lesser extent, domestic tourism. All of these factors have been impacted by broader domestic

economic conditions and consumer confidence.

Domestic travel experienced a sharp rebound immediately post-pandemic as consumer and business

spending increased, driven by rising wages, pent-up demand, limited international travel opportunities,

strong consumer confidence, and government wage subsidies and broader spending. With borders


2

United Nations World Tourism Organisation – Dec 2024

1,817

1,953

2,021

1,972

515

32

500

1,323

1,564

1,021

1,075

1,098

1,077

289

120

631

976

1,012

3,494

3,723

3,858

3,888

996

207

1,434

2,957

3,263

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

4,000

4,500

201620172018201920202021202220232024

Holiday/VacationBusinessConventions/Conferences

EducationUnspecified/Not CollectedOther

Visit Friends/Relatives

Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 10

Industry Overview

closed, New Zealanders redirected discretionary spending toward domestic tourism, providing a

temporary boost to the sector.

However, this momentum was short-lived as several economic headwinds emerged. As the New

Zealand economy entered a period of slower growth, rising interest rates and higher inflation, business

activity weakened and consumer disposable income levels reduced. This has led to a decline in

corporate travel as companies cut costs and scaled back discretionary spending. Anecdotal evidence

also suggests there may have been a permanent shift in business travel behaviours as the pandemic

transformed the way people work online with less requirement to travel.

Domestic tourism travel has been impacted by the rising cost pressures resulting in reduced or

downgraded travel plans. The re-opening of overseas travel has also resulted in travellers bypassing

New Zealand in favour of holidaying overseas.

While the post-pandemic tourism and economic impacts have largely stabilized, we understand that

domestic travel demand remains significantly lower than during the immediate post-pandemic peak,

and modestly lower than pre-pandemic levels.

2.3. Hotel Sector Performance

Key performance drivers for the hotel sector include hotel occupancy levels (relative to available rooms)

and revenue per bed, usually measured by average daily rate (“ADR”) and revenue per available room

(“RevPAR”) metrics. RevPAR is effectively the same as ADR but reflects overall occupancy levels (i.e.

for a hotel with 100% occupancy, ADR and RevPAR are equal).

Together, the early rebound in domestic travel and the gradual recovery in international travel is

reflected in the total hotel guest nights as shown in Figure 5. Despite international visitor numbers being

down on pre-pandemic levels, hotel guest nights peaked at levels higher than pre-pandemic in late

2023. The continued recovery in international visitors through 2024 replaced the small decrease in

guest nights from domestic travellers and is expected to contribute to increased hotel demand over

2025.

Figure 5: Hotel Guest Nights (000s per month)


Sources: StatsNZ Accommodation Survey (to September 2019), MBIE Accommodation Data Programme (from June 2020).

Improved guest night demand has increased hotel occupancy levels and is a key factor in driving ADRs

and RevPARs as well as supporting the sector in building more rooms (where the demand driven

response is to increase pricing or availability of rooms, including reopening of rooms which may have

been refurbished or closed during the pandemic).

Figure 6 below demonstrates the level of available rooms and hotel occupancy across the New Zealand

hotel sector from 2016 to 2024. This shows that the level of available rooms dropped by approximately

5,000 due to Covid-19 but has since recovered to 2019 levels supported by increasing demand for

rooms. Most of the increased supply has been in the main tourism sectors of Auckland, Queenstown

and Christchurch. Occupancy levels have also increased from as low as ~20% in September 2021 to

~80% in December 2024.

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1,400

1,600

201620172018201920202021202220232024

Total guest nights Domestic guest nights International guest nights

APPENDIX: INDEPENDENT ADVISER’S REPORT

Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 11
Industry Overview

Figure 6: National Hotel Room Availability and Occupancy


Sources: StatsNZ Accommodation Survey (to September 2019), MBIE Accommodation Data Programme (from June 2020).

As shown in Figure 7, the impact of reduced demand in the early stage of the pandemic recovery can

be observed in the ADR charged by hotels and the changes in RevPAR. While hotels have since

increased ADRs in response to increased demand and cost pressures, RevPAR was only marginally

above 2019 levels in 2023 ($158 vs $155). This reflects that 2023 occupancy was still ~69% relative to

81% in 2019. We also note that while ADR and RevPAR have recovered to be above pre-pandemic

levels, significant cost increases mean that profitability per bed remains significantly lower.

Figure 7: New Zealand Hotel Occupancy and Revenue


Source: Hotel Data New Zealand

2.4. Hotel Industry Outlook

The outlook for the New Zealand hotel sector remains positive on the back of an expected recovery in

international tourist arrivals and broader economic recovery which should support improved disposable

income levels and business travel. While there is increasing confidence in the sector outlook, it remains

susceptible to external shocks and any deterioration in the domestic and international economy.

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

-

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

35,000

40,000

201620172018201920202021202220232024

Number of stay units (lhs)Occupancy rate (rhs)

$193

$195

$168

$173

$228

$155

$94 $94

$78

$158

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

$-

$50

$100

$150

$200

$250

20192020202120222023

ADR (NZ$)RevPAR (NZ$)Occupancy (%)

Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 12

Industry Overview

Figure 8: International Visitor Arrivals (Million) – Actuals and TECNZ Forecast


Source: StatsNZ Visitor Arrivals, TECNZ International Arrivals Forecast January 2025.

Figure 8 highlights forecast international tourism arrivals are expected to recover to pre-pandemic

levels by 2027. This is expected to be supported by the recovery in key markets including Australia,

China, the USA and Europe.

Domestic tourism and business travel is also expected to support growing demand for hotel rooms

driven by stabilising costs, the expected easing in interest rates and the consequent improvement in

disposable incomes. This trend is also expected to be supported by increasing number of international

artists playing at New Zealand stadia, the opening of the Christchurch stadium and increasing levels of

convention centre demand.

Increased confidence in the sector has also been demonstrated through the construction of new hotels

or expansion of existing hotels (including MCK’s refurbishment and release of additional rooms in the

last 2 years). Much of the new room supply since 2019 has been driven by the large global operators

including IHG and Wyndham as well as Sudima.

2.5. Residential Property Market

CDI’s business has no exposure to the New Zealand hotel market. Its performance and earnings are

influenced by the residential property market, particularly the market for new homes in residential

subdivisions. The key factors driving the residential property market largely relate to domestic economic

factors including population growth, interest rates, employment and income levels, the availability of

credit (influenced by bank lending restrictions such as loan to value ratios) and the costs of building a

new home.

Recent trends for some of these economic indicators are summarised in Figure 9. These show that

while house construction cost growth has exceeded income growth over the last 10 years, near 0%

interest rates were a key contributor to the increased investment in section sales and new homes (and

house prices) post Covid-19. Other factors which impact on new section sales include the availability of

land, zoning changes (i.e. rural to residential) and council consenting.



0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

Mar-18Mar-19Mar-20Mar-21Mar-22Mar-23Mar-24Mar-25Mar-26Mar-27

Millions

Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 11
Industry Overview

Figure 6: National Hotel Room Availability and Occupancy


Sources: StatsNZ Accommodation Survey (to September 2019), MBIE Accommodation Data Programme (from June 2020).

As shown in Figure 7, the impact of reduced demand in the early stage of the pandemic recovery can

be observed in the ADR charged by hotels and the changes in RevPAR. While hotels have since

increased ADRs in response to increased demand and cost pressures, RevPAR was only marginally

above 2019 levels in 2023 ($158 vs $155). This reflects that 2023 occupancy was still ~69% relative to

81% in 2019. We also note that while ADR and RevPAR have recovered to be above pre-pandemic

levels, significant cost increases mean that profitability per bed remains significantly lower.

Figure 7: New Zealand Hotel Occupancy and Revenue


Source: Hotel Data New Zealand

2.4. Hotel Industry Outlook

The outlook for the New Zealand hotel sector remains positive on the back of an expected recovery in

international tourist arrivals and broader economic recovery which should support improved disposable

income levels and business travel. While there is increasing confidence in the sector outlook, it remains

susceptible to external shocks and any deterioration in the domestic and international economy.

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

-

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

35,000

40,000

201620172018201920202021202220232024

Number of stay units (lhs)Occupancy rate (rhs)

$193

$195

$168

$173

$228

$155

$94 $94

$78

$158

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

$-

$50

$100

$150

$200

$250

20192020202120222023

ADR (NZ$)RevPAR (NZ$)Occupancy (%)

Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 12

Industry Overview

Figure 8: International Visitor Arrivals (Million) – Actuals and TECNZ Forecast


Source: StatsNZ Visitor Arrivals, TECNZ International Arrivals Forecast January 2025.

Figure 8 highlights forecast international tourism arrivals are expected to recover to pre-pandemic

levels by 2027. This is expected to be supported by the recovery in key markets including Australia,

China, the USA and Europe.

Domestic tourism and business travel is also expected to support growing demand for hotel rooms

driven by stabilising costs, the expected easing in interest rates and the consequent improvement in

disposable incomes. This trend is also expected to be supported by increasing number of international

artists playing at New Zealand stadia, the opening of the Christchurch stadium and increasing levels of

convention centre demand.

Increased confidence in the sector has also been demonstrated through the construction of new hotels

or expansion of existing hotels (including MCK’s refurbishment and release of additional rooms in the

last 2 years). Much of the new room supply since 2019 has been driven by the large global operators

including IHG and Wyndham as well as Sudima.

2.5. Residential Property Market

CDI’s business has no exposure to the New Zealand hotel market. Its performance and earnings are

influenced by the residential property market, particularly the market for new homes in residential

subdivisions. The key factors driving the residential property market largely relate to domestic economic

factors including population growth, interest rates, employment and income levels, the availability of

credit (influenced by bank lending restrictions such as loan to value ratios) and the costs of building a

new home.

Recent trends for some of these economic indicators are summarised in Figure 9. These show that

while house construction cost growth has exceeded income growth over the last 10 years, near 0%

interest rates were a key contributor to the increased investment in section sales and new homes (and

house prices) post Covid-19. Other factors which impact on new section sales include the availability of

land, zoning changes (i.e. rural to residential) and council consenting.



0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

Mar-18Mar-19Mar-20Mar-21Mar-22Mar-23Mar-24Mar-25Mar-26Mar-27

Millions

APPENDIX: INDEPENDENT ADVISER’S REPORT

Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 13
Industry Overview

Figure 9: Economic Indicators (2014 – 2024)

Household Income Levels

(individual average annual

earnings, $k)

Interest Rates (5-year bank swap

rate)

New Residential Property

Construction Costs ($/sqm)


Source: Stats NZ (quarterly data for household incomes and residential construction costs to Q4 2024), IRESS. Home

construction costs based on council consent data (value and area of consented new homes).


Figure 10 shows the number of historical residential section sales in the key regions in which CDI

operates (Auckland, Canterbury and Waikato) over the last 10 years (by quarter). Key take-outs from

this data include:

− Over 2015 and 2016 section sales in the Auckland region broadly fluctuated between 600 –

900 per quarter while the Canterbury and Waikato regions were around 500 – 700 per quarter.

Section sales in all regions slowed over the 2017 – 2019 period with Auckland around 500 –

700 and Canterbury and Waikato around the 500 section sales per quarter level;

− The fall-out from Covid-19 generated a significant spike in new residential section sales fuelled

by cheap credit and government stimuli. New residential section sales spiked to over 1,200 in

the 4

th

quarter of 2020 in the Auckland region, over 1,000 in Canterbury and almost 900 in

Waikato; and

− Following the post Covid-19 boom, Canterbury section sales are averaging around 400 per

quarter while Auckland is around 250 per quarter and Waikato sales are around 330 per

quarter, with all regions significantly below pre-2018 levels.


Figure 10: New Zealand Residential Section Sales by Number by Region (Quarterly, 2015 - 2024)


Source: REINZ

The broader outlook for the residential property market remains subdued but is expected to improve

during 2025 following reductions in mortgage interest rates, the stabilisation of construction costs and

growing consumer confidence and income levels.

$40

$45

$50

$55

$60

$65

$70

$75

$80

20142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

6%

20142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

$2,500

$3,000

$3,500

20142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

6.4% CAGR

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

Qtr1Qtr2Qtr3Qtr4Qtr1Qtr2Qtr3Qtr4Qtr1Qtr2Qtr3Qtr4Qtr1Qtr2Qtr3Qtr4Qtr1Qtr2Qtr3Qtr4Qtr1Qtr2Qtr3Qtr4Qtr1Qtr2Qtr3Qtr4Qtr1Qtr2Qtr3Qtr4Qtr1Qtr2Qtr3Qtr4Qtr1Qtr2Qtr3Qtr4

2015201620172018201920202021202220232024

Auckland RegionCanterbury RegionWaikato Region

4.3% CAGR

Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 14

Profile of MCK

3.0 Profile of MCK

3.1. Overview of the Company

As summarised in Figure 11 below, the Company comprises four key business components:

- MCK:

1. NZ hotel ownership and operation, as well as franchised hotels (“NZ Hotels”)

2. Sofitel Brisbane Joint Venture (“Sofitel Brisbane JV”) and Sydney Zenith apartments

(“Sydney Apartments”).

- CDI:

3. Residential and commercial land development (“CDI Residential Land Development”).

4. Investment property ownership (“CDI Investment Property”).

Figure 11: Simplified Corporate Structure of MCK Group


MCK largely comprises MCK Group’s hotel operations. Hotel operators typically pursue a range of

operating models for the ownership and management of hotels. These models can vary between an

“asset heavy” approach in which the entity owns the real estate and operates the hotel, and an “asset

light” approach in which the hotel operator leases the hotel from the property owner or directly manages

the hotel on another entity’s behalf. The asset light model also extends to operators who franchise their

brand.

MCK predominantly operates an asset heavy model; it owns and manages 15 of its NZ Hotels (noting

Copthorne Bay of Islands is 49% owned and 26 rooms at Copthorne Lakeview are owned by

individuals) with 2 hotels managed and 2 franchised. In addition to the hotel properties, MCK owns

surplus land adjacent to four hotels (Queenstown, Te Anau, Palmerston North and Rotorua) as well as

a new land site acquired in Whangarei in 2024 for future hotel development.

Following the conversion of the former Kingsgate Millennium hotel in Sydney into a mixed use

residential and commercial complex completed in 2006, MCK has been in the process of selling the

apartment units. As of 31 December 2024, MCK owned 22 unsold apartments, 2 commercial suites, 14

carparks and 25 storage cages, with the majority currently being rented.

CDI represents MCK Group’s residential development activities and investment property interests.

3.2. MCK Hotels Portfolio

A summary of MCK’s hotels is set out in Table 3 with a location map presented in Figure 12.

MCK’s hotel strategy is to invest in and manage hotels for income and long-term capital growth. NZ

Hotels comprises 19 hotels with a total of 2,506 rooms while the Sofitel Brisbane has a further 416

rooms. MCK operates under seven different brands (including the recently acquired Sofitel Hotel in

Brisbane). Of these hotels:

Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 13
Industry Overview

Figure 9: Economic Indicators (2014 – 2024)

Household Income Levels

(individual average annual

earnings, $k)

Interest Rates (5-year bank swap

rate)

New Residential Property

Construction Costs ($/sqm)


Source: Stats NZ (quarterly data for household incomes and residential construction costs to Q4 2024), IRESS. Home

construction costs based on council consent data (value and area of consented new homes).


Figure 10 shows the number of historical residential section sales in the key regions in which CDI

operates (Auckland, Canterbury and Waikato) over the last 10 years (by quarter). Key take-outs from

this data include:

− Over 2015 and 2016 section sales in the Auckland region broadly fluctuated between 600 –

900 per quarter while the Canterbury and Waikato regions were around 500 – 700 per quarter.

Section sales in all regions slowed over the 2017 – 2019 period with Auckland around 500 –

700 and Canterbury and Waikato around the 500 section sales per quarter level;

− The fall-out from Covid-19 generated a significant spike in new residential section sales fuelled

by cheap credit and government stimuli. New residential section sales spiked to over 1,200 in

the 4

th

quarter of 2020 in the Auckland region, over 1,000 in Canterbury and almost 900 in

Waikato; and

− Following the post Covid-19 boom, Canterbury section sales are averaging around 400 per

quarter while Auckland is around 250 per quarter and Waikato sales are around 330 per

quarter, with all regions significantly below pre-2018 levels.


Figure 10: New Zealand Residential Section Sales by Number by Region (Quarterly, 2015 - 2024)


Source: REINZ

The broader outlook for the residential property market remains subdued but is expected to improve

during 2025 following reductions in mortgage interest rates, the stabilisation of construction costs and

growing consumer confidence and income levels.

$40

$45

$50

$55

$60

$65

$70

$75

$80

20142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

6%

20142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

$2,500

$3,000

$3,500

20142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

6.4% CAGR

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

Qtr1Qtr2Qtr3Qtr4Qtr1Qtr2Qtr3Qtr4Qtr1Qtr2Qtr3Qtr4Qtr1Qtr2Qtr3Qtr4Qtr1Qtr2Qtr3Qtr4Qtr1Qtr2Qtr3Qtr4Qtr1Qtr2Qtr3Qtr4Qtr1Qtr2Qtr3Qtr4Qtr1Qtr2Qtr3Qtr4Qtr1Qtr2Qtr3Qtr4

2015201620172018201920202021202220232024

Auckland RegionCanterbury RegionWaikato Region

4.3% CAGR

Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 14

Profile of MCK

3.0 Profile of MCK

3.1. Overview of the Company

As summarised in Figure 11 below, the Company comprises four key business components:

- MCK:

1. NZ hotel ownership and operation, as well as franchised hotels (“NZ Hotels”)

2. Sofitel Brisbane Joint Venture (“Sofitel Brisbane JV”) and Sydney Zenith apartments

(“Sydney Apartments”).

- CDI:

3. Residential and commercial land development (“CDI Residential Land Development”).

4. Investment property ownership (“CDI Investment Property”).

Figure 11: Simplified Corporate Structure of MCK Group


MCK largely comprises MCK Group’s hotel operations. Hotel operators typically pursue a range of

operating models for the ownership and management of hotels. These models can vary between an

“asset heavy” approach in which the entity owns the real estate and operates the hotel, and an “asset

light” approach in which the hotel operator leases the hotel from the property owner or directly manages

the hotel on another entity’s behalf. The asset light model also extends to operators who franchise their

brand.

MCK predominantly operates an asset heavy model; it owns and manages 15 of its NZ Hotels (noting

Copthorne Bay of Islands is 49% owned and 26 rooms at Copthorne Lakeview are owned by

individuals) with 2 hotels managed and 2 franchised. In addition to the hotel properties, MCK owns

surplus land adjacent to four hotels (Queenstown, Te Anau, Palmerston North and Rotorua) as well as

a new land site acquired in Whangarei in 2024 for future hotel development.

Following the conversion of the former Kingsgate Millennium hotel in Sydney into a mixed use

residential and commercial complex completed in 2006, MCK has been in the process of selling the

apartment units. As of 31 December 2024, MCK owned 22 unsold apartments, 2 commercial suites, 14

carparks and 25 storage cages, with the majority currently being rented.

CDI represents MCK Group’s residential development activities and investment property interests.

3.2. MCK Hotels Portfolio

A summary of MCK’s hotels is set out in Table 3 with a location map presented in Figure 12.

MCK’s hotel strategy is to invest in and manage hotels for income and long-term capital growth. NZ

Hotels comprises 19 hotels with a total of 2,506 rooms while the Sofitel Brisbane has a further 416

rooms. MCK operates under seven different brands (including the recently acquired Sofitel Hotel in

Brisbane). Of these hotels:

APPENDIX: INDEPENDENT ADVISER’S REPORT

Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 15
Profile of MCK

- MCK owns 12 of these hotel properties on a freehold basis with long-term leasehold

agreements on a further 3 properties (Copthorne Auckland, Copthorne Bay of Islands and

Copthorne Greymouth);

- Two hotels are owned and operated by third-parties under franchise arrangements;

- MCK manages two hotels owned by third-parties; and

- The Sofitel Hotel in Brisbane is 50% owned by MCK through a joint-venture and is managed

by the Accor Group.

Table 3: MCK Hotel Portfolio

Location Brand # Rooms Operating Model

Queenstown Copthorne 240 Owned

Rotorua Millennium 228 Owned

Queenstown Millenium 220 Owned

Auckland M Social 190 Owned

Bay of Islands Copthorne 180 49% Owned (JV)

Rotorua Copthorne 58

3

Owned

Wellington Copthorne 118 Owned

Auckland Copthorne 106 Owned

Queenstown Copthorne 85 ~ 64% Owned

Palmerston North Copthorne 76 Owned

Te Anau Kingsgate 69 Owned

Christchurch The Mayfair 67 Owned

Dunedin Kingsgate 55 Owned

Greymouth Copthorne 53 Owned

New Plymouth Millennium 42 Owned


Auckland Grand Millennium 453 Managed

Paihia Kingsgate 113 Managed


Wairarapa Copthorne 102 Franchised

Taupo Millennium 51 Franchised

Total NZ Hotels 2,506


Brisbane Central Sofitel 416 50% Owned (JV)

Sources: MCK Annual Report 2023, website and Company announcements.



3

Although Copthorne Rotorua has 136 rooms available, only 58 are currently utilised.

Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 16

Profile of MCK

Figure 12: NZ Hotels Locations



Sources: MCK Annual Report 2023, website and Company Announcements.


3.3. CDL Investments

MCK owns 65.31% of the NZX listed CDL Investments New Zealand Limited (“CDI”). The company is

primarily engaged in the acquisition, development and sale of residential land in New Zealand. In

addition to the primary land development functions, CDI also engages in commercial development and

investment. CDI has operated in New Zealand for nearly 30 years. From 2018-2023, CDI developed

and sold over 900 residential sections and over the last 20 years has completed numerous subdivisions

in Auckland, Hamilton, Tauranga, Hastings, Havelock North, Taupo, Nelson, Christchurch and

Queenstown.

As shown in Figure 13 below, CDI’s residential property development portfolio spans over 280 hectares

across 14 sites. These projects are expected to deliver a total of over 3,000 sections along with up to

19 additional investment properties.


Millenium


M Collection


Copthorne


Kingsgate

Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 15
Profile of MCK

- MCK owns 12 of these hotel properties on a freehold basis with long-term leasehold

agreements on a further 3 properties (Copthorne Auckland, Copthorne Bay of Islands and

Copthorne Greymouth);

- Two hotels are owned and operated by third-parties under franchise arrangements;

- MCK manages two hotels owned by third-parties; and

- The Sofitel Hotel in Brisbane is 50% owned by MCK through a joint-venture and is managed

by the Accor Group.

Table 3: MCK Hotel Portfolio

Location Brand # Rooms Operating Model

Queenstown Copthorne 240 Owned

Rotorua Millennium 228 Owned

Queenstown Millenium 220 Owned

Auckland M Social 190 Owned

Bay of Islands Copthorne 180 49% Owned (JV)

Rotorua Copthorne 58

3

Owned

Wellington Copthorne 118 Owned

Auckland Copthorne 106 Owned

Queenstown Copthorne 85 ~ 64% Owned

Palmerston North Copthorne 76 Owned

Te Anau Kingsgate 69 Owned

Christchurch The Mayfair 67 Owned

Dunedin Kingsgate 55 Owned

Greymouth Copthorne 53 Owned

New Plymouth Millennium 42 Owned


Auckland Grand Millennium 453 Managed

Paihia Kingsgate 113 Managed


Wairarapa Copthorne 102 Franchised

Taupo Millennium 51 Franchised

Total NZ Hotels 2,506


Brisbane Central Sofitel 416 50% Owned (JV)

Sources: MCK Annual Report 2023, website and Company announcements.



3

Although Copthorne Rotorua has 136 rooms available, only 58 are currently utilised.

Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 16

Profile of MCK

Figure 12: NZ Hotels Locations


Sources: MCK Annual Report 2023, website and Company Announcements.


3.3. CDL Investments

MCK owns 65.31% of the NZX listed CDL Investments New Zealand Limited (“CDI”). The company is

primarily engaged in the acquisition, development and sale of residential land in New Zealand. In

addition to the primary land development functions, CDI also engages in commercial development and

investment. CDI has operated in New Zealand for nearly 30 years. From 2018-2023, CDI developed

and sold over 900 residential sections and over the last 20 years has completed numerous subdivisions

in Auckland, Hamilton, Tauranga, Hastings, Havelock North, Taupo, Nelson, Christchurch and

Queenstown.

As shown in Figure 13 below, CDI’s residential property development portfolio spans over 280 hectares

across 14 sites. These projects are expected to deliver a total of over 3,000 sections along with up to

19 additional investment properties.


Millenium


M Collection


Copthorne


Kingsgate

APPENDIX: INDEPENDENT ADVISER’S REPORT

Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 17
Profile of MCK

Figure 13: CDI Residential Development Portfolio


Source: CDI annual results and property searches.

CDI’s income is highly dependent on the overall residential property market, although EBITDA from

property development activities was greater than $40m per annum in the five years to FY22. With a

weakening property market, FY23 property sales slowed to less than one third of FY21 sales, resulting

in EBITDA of $13.7m from development activities.

CDI aims to diversify its revenue and earnings beyond the residential property market through the

development and ownership of commercial properties. In 2023, rental income from its two warehouses

and two retail spaces totalled $2.5 million, accounting for nearly 8% of the company’s total revenue.

CDI holds significant cash reserves and no debt.

3.4. Capital Structure and Ownership

MCK currently has 105,478,743 ordinary shares on issue, of which CDL currently holds 75.86%. There

are no other substantial security holders (those with a beneficial interest of 5% or more).

MCK has also issued 52,739,543 non-voting RPS, with CDL currently holding 91.34%. The RPS rank

equally with ordinary shares with respect to all distributions made by the Company (including without

limitation, to dividend payments) except for any distributions made in the context of a liquidation of the

Company (see Section 4.2 for further information on the RPS).

MCK has historically maintained a conservative debt profile, funding its growth primarily through

retained earnings and cash reserves. In recent years, the company has actively reduced its debt, with

total Group net cash of $38m as of 31 December 2024 (although the MCK has subsequently drawn

debt to fund the $31.9m purchase of Mayfair Christchurch).

3.5. Share Price Performance

Figure 14 illustrates MCK’s share price performance for the period between 1 January 2022 and 3

February 2025. As at 17 January 2025 (prior to CDL’s announcement of the Offer), MCK’s share price

was $1.80, representing a 52% discount to reported NAV of $3.46 per share as of 31 December 2024.

Hawkes Bay

Arataki

Iona



Hamilton

R2 Growth Cell

(Puketaha)


Christchurch / Rolleston

Prestons Park

Worsleys Road

Stonebrook

Wairakei Road

Nelson

Lucas Terrace

Highland Drive


Auckland

Roscommon Road

Hobsonville Road



Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 18

Profile of MCK

Figure 14: MCK Share Price and associated trading volume (1 Jan 2022 to 3 Feb 2025)

Sources: CapitalIQ. Note: Volume excludes the 5.27 m shares purchased by the Offeror on 29 October 2024.

3.6. Share Liquidity

With over 75% of the outstanding MCK ordinary shares and over 90% of the RPS held by CDL, the

shares on issue in MCK are thinly traded and have poor liquidity.

The trading volume for MCK’s ordinary shares over a number of periods is summarised in Table 4.

Average daily volume in all of the selected periods is very low, ranging between about 1,860 and 6,300

shares per day. The total number of shares traded over the last year (~761k) represents less than 1%

of the total shares on issue and ~3% of the free-float shares (excluding CDL’s shareholding). Bid-ask

spreads have also averaged $0.06, or approximately 3% of the share price since January 2022.

This low liquidity will be a large deterrent to institutional investors and larger market participants, as

executing large trades without significantly moving the share price is likely to be difficult. The absence

of active institutional investors and the limited presence of engaged investors is evident in the lack of

analyst coverage, even when adjusting for market capitalisation.

Table 4: Share Trading History for MCK Ordinary Shares (to 17 January 2025)

30 Days 3 Month 1 Year 3 Year

Total Volume 37,133 317,494 761,097 4,728,244

Average Daily Volume 1,857 5,121 3,020 6,296

Volume as % of free float shares

(excluding CDL shareholding)

0.1% 1.2% 3.0% 18.6%

VWAP $1.75 $1.81 $1.80 $2.00

High Price $1.90 $1.90 $1.95 $2.57

Low Price $1.70 $1.70 $1.66 $1.66

Sources: CapitalIQ. Note: Volume excludes the 5.27m shares purchased by the Offeror on 29 October 2024. Free float shares based

on current shares on issue excluding CDL’s shareholding.





-

100,000

200,000

300,000

400,000

500,000

600,000

700,000

$1.00

$1.50

$2.00

$2.50

$3.00

Jan-22Jul-22Jan-23Jul-23Jan-24Jul-24Jan-25

Volume (rhs)Share Price (lhs)

Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 17
Profile of MCK

Figure 13: CDI Residential Development Portfolio


Source: CDI annual results and property searches.

CDI’s income is highly dependent on the overall residential property market, although EBITDA from

property development activities was greater than $40m per annum in the five years to FY22. With a

weakening property market, FY23 property sales slowed to less than one third of FY21 sales, resulting

in EBITDA of $13.7m from development activities.

CDI aims to diversify its revenue and earnings beyond the residential property market through the

development and ownership of commercial properties. In 2023, rental income from its two warehouses

and two retail spaces totalled $2.5 million, accounting for nearly 8% of the company’s total revenue.

CDI holds significant cash reserves and no debt.

3.4. Capital Structure and Ownership

MCK currently has 105,478,743 ordinary shares on issue, of which CDL currently holds 75.86%. There

are no other substantial security holders (those with a beneficial interest of 5% or more).

MCK has also issued 52,739,543 non-voting RPS, with CDL currently holding 91.34%. The RPS rank

equally with ordinary shares with respect to all distributions made by the Company (including without

limitation, to dividend payments) except for any distributions made in the context of a liquidation of the

Company (see Section 4.2 for further information on the RPS).

MCK has historically maintained a conservative debt profile, funding its growth primarily through

retained earnings and cash reserves. In recent years, the company has actively reduced its debt, with

total Group net cash of $38m as of 31 December 2024 (although the MCK has subsequently drawn

debt to fund the $31.9m purchase of Mayfair Christchurch).

3.5. Share Price Performance

Figure 14 illustrates MCK’s share price performance for the period between 1 January 2022 and 3

February 2025. As at 17 January 2025 (prior to CDL’s announcement of the Offer), MCK’s share price

was $1.80, representing a 52% discount to reported NAV of $3.46 per share as of 31 December 2024.

Hawkes Bay

Arataki

Iona



Hamilton

R2 Growth Cell

(Puketaha)


Christchurch / Rolleston

Prestons Park

Worsleys Road

Stonebrook

Wairakei Road

Nelson

Lucas Terrace

Highland Drive


Auckland

Roscommon Road

Hobsonville Road



Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 18

Profile of MCK

Figure 14: MCK Share Price and associated trading volume (1 Jan 2022 to 3 Feb 2025)

Sources: CapitalIQ. Note: Volume excludes the 5.27 m shares purchased by the Offeror on 29 October 2024.

3.6. Share Liquidity

With over 75% of the outstanding MCK ordinary shares and over 90% of the RPS held by CDL, the

shares on issue in MCK are thinly traded and have poor liquidity.

The trading volume for MCK’s ordinary shares over a number of periods is summarised in Table 4.

Average daily volume in all of the selected periods is very low, ranging between about 1,860 and 6,300

shares per day. The total number of shares traded over the last year (~761k) represents less than 1%

of the total shares on issue and ~3% of the free-float shares (excluding CDL’s shareholding). Bid-ask

spreads have also averaged $0.06, or approximately 3% of the share price since January 2022.

This low liquidity will be a large deterrent to institutional investors and larger market participants, as

executing large trades without significantly moving the share price is likely to be difficult. The absence

of active institutional investors and the limited presence of engaged investors is evident in the lack of

analyst coverage, even when adjusting for market capitalisation.

Table 4: Share Trading History for MCK Ordinary Shares (to 17 January 2025)

30 Days 3 Month 1 Year 3 Year

Total Volume 37,133 317,494 761,097 4,728,244

Average Daily Volume 1,857 5,121 3,020 6,296

Volume as % of free float shares

(excluding CDL shareholding)

0.1% 1.2% 3.0% 18.6%

VWAP $1.75 $1.81 $1.80 $2.00

High Price $1.90 $1.90 $1.95 $2.57

Low Price $1.70 $1.70 $1.66 $1.66

Sources: CapitalIQ. Note: Volume excludes the 5.27m shares purchased by the Offeror on 29 October 2024. Free float shares based

on current shares on issue excluding CDL’s shareholding.





-

100,000

200,000

300,000

400,000

500,000

600,000

700,000

$1.00

$1.50

$2.00

$2.50

$3.00

Jan-22Jul-22Jan-23Jul-23Jan-24Jul-24Jan-25

Volume (rhs)Share Price (lhs)

APPENDIX: INDEPENDENT ADVISER’S REPORT

Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 19
Profile of MCK

3.7. Summary Financial Results

3.7.1. Financial Performance

A summary of MCK’s recent financial performance is set out in Table 5 below for the period from FY22

to FY24.

Table 5: Historical Financial Performance - Years Ending 31 December ($m)

Income Statement (MCK Segment Reporting) FY22 FY23

FY24

Hotel Operations 65.2 101.1 109.5

Residential Land Development 66.1 28.3 46.3

Investment Property 1.2 2.5

2.7

Residential Property Development 11.6 13.8 17.6

Revenue 144.2 145.7 176.2



Cost of Sales (59.7) (67.9) (78.3)

Gross Profit 84.5 77.8 97.9



Administrative Expenses (22.7) (25.5)

(29.8)

Other Operating Expenses (10.3) (11.4)

(17.0)

EBITDA 51.6 40.8

51.1



Finance Income 3.9 7.7 5.3

Finance Costs (2.3) (2.4)

(2.2)

Net Finance Income 1.5 5.3 3.1



Depreciation & Amortisation (8.3) (8.7) (8.6)

Share of Profit of Joint Venture - 0.1 1.5

Profit before Income Tax 44.78 37.5

47.1



Income Tax Expense (12.4) (10.6) (38.3)

Net Profit after Tax 32.4 26.9

8.8

Source: MCK annual reports and FY24 financial results based on segment results. Totals may not sum due to rounding.

MCK’s financial results reflect the consolidated results for MCK and CDI because of MCK’s controlling

interest in CDI. In order to illustrate the relative contributions from the respective businesses over a

period that captures performance both before and after Covid-19, Figure 15 summarises MCK Group

EBITDA by segment.

Figure 15: Summary of Historical EBITDA By Segment ($m)


Source: MCK annual reports and FY24 financial results. Note: includes minority interests but excludes Sofitel Brisbane JV.

$43.8

$43.4

$14.6

$22.9

$4.8

$19.3

$17.4

$45.1

$46.4

$40.8

$42.9

$41.4

$13.7

$22.3

$2.4

$4.1

$6.8

$7.0

$4.6

$5.4

$8.8

$91.3

$94.0

$62.2

$72.8

$51.6

$40.8

$51.1

$0

$20

$40

$60

$80

$100

FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24

Hotel OperationsResidential Land Development

Residential Property DevelopmentInvestment Property

Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 20

Profile of MCK

The main features of MCK’s historic financial performance can be summarised as follows:

- MCK’s hotel operations represents the NZ Hotels and delivered over $40m of EBITDA in both

FY18 and FY19 prior to the impacts of Covid-19. The FY20 to FY22 results were significantly

impacted by lower occupancy as a consequence of the pandemic which also impacted on

room rates due to industry oversupply. The slow recovery in the hotel segment can be

observed through FY23 and FY24, consistent with the broader industry.

- Residential land development and investment property EBITDA represents CDI earnings.

CDI’s substantial portfolio of residential land property sales and the strong post-Covid-19

residential property market resulted in strong earnings from CDI’s property development

through to FY22 (EBITDA > $40m FY18 to FY22). The impact of the weaker property market

and lower levels of activity can be observed in the lower earnings for FY23 and FY24.

- MCK’s Sydney Apartment sales have more recently delivered annual earnings of between

$4.6 and $8.8m of EBITDA. With 22 apartments remaining (as of 31 December 2024), the

contribution to earnings beyond FY26 from this component is expected to be eliminated.

3.7.2. Financial Position

A summary of MCK’s recent financial position is set out in Table 6.

Table 6: Historical Financial Position - Years Ending 31 December ($m)


Balance Sheet as of: FY22 FY23 FY24



Total Cash & ST Investments 173 75 41

Trade and Other Receivables 14 20 23

Inventories 1 2 2

Development Properties 23 27 35

Advances to Related Parties

4

- 63 65

Total Current Assets 212 187 167


Property, Plant & Equipment 255 263 283

Investment in Sofitel Brisbane JV - 44 47

Development Properties 205 217 229

Investment Properties 36 36 36

Total Non-Current Assets 497 560 595


Total Assets 709 747 762



Interest-bearing Loans and Borrowings - 12 -

Trade and Other Payables 28 32 31

Income Tax Payable 1 3 2

Other Current Liabilities 2 3 2

Total Current Liabilities 31 50 35


Interest-bearing Loans and Borrowings - - 3

Lease Liability 25 27 27

Deferred Tax 10 7 33

Total Non-Current Liabilities 35 34 62


Total Liabilities 66 84 97



Net Assets 643 662 665



Issued Capital 383 383 383

Reserves 149 166 165

Treasury Stock (1) (1) (0)


4

Includes advance to Sofitel Brisbane JV of $62.2 million as of 31 Dec 2023 and $63.7 million as of 31 Dec 2024.

Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 19
Profile of MCK

3.7. Summary Financial Results

3.7.1. Financial Performance

A summary of MCK’s recent financial performance is set out in Table 5 below for the period from FY22

to FY24.

Table 5: Historical Financial Performance - Years Ending 31 December ($m)

Income Statement (MCK Segment Reporting) FY22 FY23 FY24

Hotel Operations 65.2 101.1 109.5

Residential Land Development 66.1 28.3 46.3

Investment Property 1.2 2.5 2.7

Residential Property Development 11.6 13.8 17.6

Revenue 144.2 145.7 176.2



Cost of Sales (59.7) (67.9) (78.3)

Gross Profit 84.5 77.8 97.9



Administrative Expenses (22.7) (25.5) (29.8)

Other Operating Expenses (10.3) (11.4) (17.0)

EBITDA 51.6 40.8 51.1



Finance Income 3.9 7.7 5.3

Finance Costs (2.3) (2.4) (2.2)

Net Finance Income 1.5 5.3 3.1



Depreciation & Amortisation (8.3) (8.7) (8.6)

Share of Profit of Joint Venture - 0.1 1.5

Profit before Income Tax 44.78 37.5 47.1



Income Tax Expense (12.4) (10.6) (38.3)

Net Profit after Tax 32.4 26.9 8.8

Source: MCK annual reports and FY24 financial results based on segment results. Totals may not sum due to rounding.

MCK’s financial results reflect the consolidated results for MCK and CDI because of MCK’s controlling

interest in CDI. In order to illustrate the relative contributions from the respective businesses over a

period that captures performance both before and after Covid-19, Figure 15 summarises MCK Group

EBITDA by segment.

Figure 15: Summary of Historical EBITDA By Segment ($m)


Source: MCK annual reports and FY24 financial results. Note: includes minority interests but excludes Sofitel Brisbane JV.

$43.8

$43.4

$14.6

$22.9

$4.8

$19.3

$17.4

$45.1

$46.4

$40.8

$42.9

$41.4

$13.7

$22.3

$2.4

$4.1

$6.8

$7.0

$4.6

$5.4

$8.8

$91.3

$94.0

$62.2

$72.8

$51.6

$40.8

$51.1

$0

$20

$40

$60

$80

$100

FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24

Hotel OperationsResidential Land Development

Residential Property DevelopmentInvestment Property

Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 20

Profile of MCK

The main features of MCK’s historic financial performance can be summarised as follows:

- MCK’s hotel operations represents the NZ Hotels and delivered over $40m of EBITDA in both

FY18 and FY19 prior to the impacts of Covid-19. The FY20 to FY22 results were significantly

impacted by lower occupancy as a consequence of the pandemic which also impacted on

room rates due to industry oversupply. The slow recovery in the hotel segment can be

observed through FY23 and FY24, consistent with the broader industry.

- Residential land development and investment property EBITDA represents CDI earnings.

CDI’s substantial portfolio of residential land property sales and the strong post-Covid-19

residential property market resulted in strong earnings from CDI’s property development

through to FY22 (EBITDA > $40m FY18 to FY22). The impact of the weaker property market

and lower levels of activity can be observed in the lower earnings for FY23 and FY24.

- MCK’s Sydney Apartment sales have more recently delivered annual earnings of between

$4.6 and $8.8m of EBITDA. With 22 apartments remaining (as of 31 December 2024), the

contribution to earnings beyond FY26 from this component is expected to be eliminated.

3.7.2. Financial Position

A summary of MCK’s recent financial position is set out in Table 6.

Table 6: Historical Financial Position - Years Ending 31 December ($m)


Balance Sheet as of: FY22 FY23 FY24



Total Cash & ST Investments 173 75 41

Trade and Other Receivables 14 20 23

Inventories 1 2 2

Development Properties 23 27 35

Advances to Related Parties

4

- 63 65

Total Current Assets 212 187 167


Property, Plant & Equipment 255 263 283

Investment in Sofitel Brisbane JV - 44 47

Development Properties 205 217 229

Investment Properties 36 36 36

Total Non-Current Assets 497 560 595


Total Assets 709 747 762



Interest-bearing Loans and Borrowings - 12 -

Trade and Other Payables 28 32 31

Income Tax Payable 1 3 2

Other Current Liabilities 2 3 2

Total Current Liabilities 31 50 35


Interest-bearing Loans and Borrowings - - 3

Lease Liability 25 27 27

Deferred Tax 10 7 33

Total Non-Current Liabilities 35 34 62


Total Liabilities 66 84 97



Net Assets 643 662 665



Issued Capital 383 383 383

Reserves 149 166 165

Treasury Stock (1) (1) (0)


4

Includes advance to Sofitel Brisbane JV of $62.2 million as of 31 Dec 2023 and $63.7 million as of 31 Dec 2024.

APPENDIX: INDEPENDENT ADVISER’S REPORT

Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 21
Profile of MCK

Equity Attributable to Owners of the Parent 531 548 548


Non-controlling Interests 112 115 117


Total Equity 643 662 665

Source: MCK annual reports and FY24 financial results. Totals may not sum due to rounding.

Key features of MCK’s consolidated historic financial position include:

- The majority of MCK’s operating assets relate to its hotel properties and the investment in

residential development land and commercial properties held through CDI. These assets are

recorded at historic cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment losses. The FY24

consolidated total carrying value of ~$665m (including the minority interests in CDI and the

$64m advance to Sofitel Brisbane JV) is considerably lower than their equivalent market value

of $1,069m (see Section 3.8).

- MCK has modest working capital requirements, primarily relating to the operation of the hotel

business.

- MCK records lease liabilities related to long-term land leases for hotel sites, buildings, and

motor vehicles, which totalled $26.7 million at 31 December 2024.

- As at 31 December 2024, the company held $41 million in cash and short-term investments

and only ~$3m of drawn debt under its $120m bank facility. However, MCK settled on the

acquisition of Mayfair Christchurch in January 2025 and utilised another ~$30m of the

available bank facilities.

- MCK’s deferred tax liability primarily relates to the difference between the depreciation on

buildings for tax purposes and the values used for financial reporting purposes. The change in

tax treatment during FY24 which removed the ability to depreciate buildings resulted in a non-

cash increase in deferred tax liabilities of $25.8m.

- The Minority Interest largely relates to the 34.69% of CDI not owned by MCK. This value is

based on the carrying value of CDI’s properties which, as with MCK, are recorded at historical

cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment losses. The total of ~$117m also includes

MCK’s minority interests in Copthorne Bay of Islands and Copthorne Queenstown Lakeview.

3.7.3. Cash Flow

MCK’s cash flow statement is presented in Table 7.

Table 7: Historical Cash Flow Statement - Years Ending 31 December ($m)

Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows FY22 FY23

FY24





Receipts from customers 146 142 172

Interest received (paid) 3 8

5

Payments to suppliers and employees (85) (100)

(126)

Purchases of development land (25) (20)

(24)

Income tax paid (14) (11)

(14)

Net cash inflow/(outflow) from operating activities 26 20

14





Purchases of property, plant and equipment (7) (14) (28)

Purchases of investment property (14) (0)

(1)

Investment in joint venture - (44)

-

Advance to joint venture - (62)

-

Divestments in short term bank deposits 10 48

63

Net cash inflow/(outflow) from investing activities (11) (72)

33





Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 22

Profile of MCK

Drawdown/(Repayment) of borrowings (1) 12 (9)

Lease payments (3) (2) (2)

Dividends paid to shareholders of MCK (6) (5) (5)

Dividends paid to non-controlling shareholders (4) (4) (5)

Net cash inflow/(outflow) from financing activities (14) 1 (20)





Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 1 (52) 26

Add opening cash and cash equivalents 58 61 11

Exchange rate adjustment 2 2 2





Closing cash and cash equivalents 61 11 40

Source: MCK Annual Reports and FY24 financial results. Totals may not sum due to rounding.

The main features of MCK’s historic cash flow performance can be summarised as follows:

- Total cash receipts include the sale of residential property by CDI and MCK. As a result of the

weak property market in 2023, sales of residential land by CDI reduced significantly. Receipts

from customers recovered in 2024 as a result of strengthening hotel performance and an

increase in sales of residential property.

- Payments to suppliers and employees relate primarily to hotel operations.

- Purchases of development land is that undertaken by CDI. Purchases of property, plant, and

equipment relates to purchases by MCK related to hotels and associated assets.

- The investment in, and advance to, the joint venture in FY23 relates to the purchase of the

Sofitel Brisbane JV.

3.8. Market Value of Properties

3.8.1. MCK Property Portfolio

Prior to 2021, MCK reported the value of its hotel assets at fair market value. In 2021, the company

changed its accounting policy and now reports its assets at historical cost. As result of this change, the

reported value of hotel land and buildings owned by MCK reduced from $630m to $273m. Figure 16

summarises the market value and book value (historic cost less accumulated depreciation and

impairment losses) for MCK Group’s properties since 2020.

Figure 16: Market Value and Book Value of MCK and CDI Properties


Sources: MCK annual reports (including restated 2020 accounts) and FY24 financial results; CDI annual reports and FY24 financial

results; and third-party 2024 valuations as outlined below. Figure does not include The Mayfair Hotel (settled on 22 January 2025).

$630

$273

$629

$259

$589

$255

$719

$361

$646

$377

$193

$109

$238

$139

$267

$158

$270

$171

$276

$188

$0

$200

$400

$600

$800

$1,000

$1,200

Market

Value

Book

Value

Market

Value

Book

Value

Market

Value

Book

Value

Market

Value

Book

Value

Market

Value

Book

Value

20202021202220232024

MCK Hotels & Share of AustraliaCDL Properties (less minority interests)

Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 21
Profile of MCK

Equity Attributable to Owners of the Parent 531 548 548


Non-controlling Interests 112 115 117


Total Equity 643 662 665

Source: MCK annual reports and FY24 financial results. Totals may not sum due to rounding.

Key features of MCK’s consolidated historic financial position include:

- The majority of MCK’s operating assets relate to its hotel properties and the investment in

residential development land and commercial properties held through CDI. These assets are

recorded at historic cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment losses. The FY24

consolidated total carrying value of ~$665m (including the minority interests in CDI and the

$64m advance to Sofitel Brisbane JV) is considerably lower than their equivalent market value

of $1,069m (see Section 3.8).

- MCK has modest working capital requirements, primarily relating to the operation of the hotel

business.

- MCK records lease liabilities related to long-term land leases for hotel sites, buildings, and

motor vehicles, which totalled $26.7 million at 31 December 2024.

- As at 31 December 2024, the company held $41 million in cash and short-term investments

and only ~$3m of drawn debt under its $120m bank facility. However, MCK settled on the

acquisition of Mayfair Christchurch in January 2025 and utilised another ~$30m of the

available bank facilities.

- MCK’s deferred tax liability primarily relates to the difference between the depreciation on

buildings for tax purposes and the values used for financial reporting purposes. The change in

tax treatment during FY24 which removed the ability to depreciate buildings resulted in a non-

cash increase in deferred tax liabilities of $25.8m.

- The Minority Interest largely relates to the 34.69% of CDI not owned by MCK. This value is

based on the carrying value of CDI’s properties which, as with MCK, are recorded at historical

cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment losses. The total of ~$117m also includes

MCK’s minority interests in Copthorne Bay of Islands and Copthorne Queenstown Lakeview.

3.7.3. Cash Flow

MCK’s cash flow statement is presented in Table 7.

Table 7: Historical Cash Flow Statement - Years Ending 31 December ($m)

Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows FY22 FY23 FY24





Receipts from customers 146 142 172

Interest received (paid) 3 8 5

Payments to suppliers and employees (85) (100) (126)

Purchases of development land (25) (20) (24)

Income tax paid (14) (11) (14)

Net cash inflow/(outflow) from operating activities 26 20 14





Purchases of property, plant and equipment (7) (14) (28)

Purchases of investment property (14) (0) (1)

Investment in joint venture - (44) -

Advance to joint venture - (62) -

Divestments in short term bank deposits 10 48 63

Net cash inflow/(outflow) from investing activities (11) (72) 33





Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 22

Profile of MCK

Drawdown/(Repayment) of borrowings (1) 12 (9)

Lease payments (3) (2)

(2)

Dividends paid to shareholders of MCK (6) (5)

(5)

Dividends paid to non-controlling shareholders (4) (4)

(5)

Net cash inflow/(outflow) from financing activities (14) 1

(20)





Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 1 (52) 26

Add opening cash and cash equivalents 58 61

11

Exchange rate adjustment 2 2

2





Closing cash and cash equivalents 61 11 40

Source: MCK Annual Reports and FY24 financial results. Totals may not sum due to rounding.

The main features of MCK’s historic cash flow performance can be summarised as follows:

- Total cash receipts include the sale of residential property by CDI and MCK. As a result of the

weak property market in 2023, sales of residential land by CDI reduced significantly. Receipts

from customers recovered in 2024 as a result of strengthening hotel performance and an

increase in sales of residential property.

- Payments to suppliers and employees relate primarily to hotel operations.

- Purchases of development land is that undertaken by CDI. Purchases of property, plant, and

equipment relates to purchases by MCK related to hotels and associated assets.

- The investment in, and advance to, the joint venture in FY23 relates to the purchase of the

Sofitel Brisbane JV.

3.8. Market Value of Properties

3.8.1. MCK Property Portfolio

Prior to 2021, MCK reported the value of its hotel assets at fair market value. In 2021, the company

changed its accounting policy and now reports its assets at historical cost. As result of this change, the

reported value of hotel land and buildings owned by MCK reduced from $630m to $273m. Figure 16

summarises the market value and book value (historic cost less accumulated depreciation and

impairment losses) for MCK Group’s properties since 2020.

Figure 16: Market Value and Book Value of MCK and CDI Properties


Sources: MCK annual reports (including restated 2020 accounts) and FY24 financial results; CDI annual reports and FY24 financial

results; and third-party 2024 valuations as outlined below. Figure does not include The Mayfair Hotel (settled on 22 January 2025).

$630

$273

$629

$259

$589

$255

$719

$361

$646

$377

$193

$109

$238

$139

$267

$158

$270

$171

$276

$188

$0

$200

$400

$600

$800

$1,000

$1,200

Market

Value

Book

Value

Market

Value

Book

Value

Market

Value

Book

Value

Market

Value

Book

Value

Market

Value

Book

Value

20202021202220232024

MCK Hotels & Share of AustraliaCDL Properties (less minority interests)

APPENDIX: INDEPENDENT ADVISER’S REPORT

Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 23
Profile of MCK

Although MCK no longer records the value of its hotels, developments and investment properties at fair

market value, these assets are periodically independently valued for impairment testing purposes.

These valuations are typically undertaken on a triennial rotating basis with all assets having been

revalued in the last three years. However, following the Offer from CDL, MCK’s valuers have provided

desktop valuation updates for all of the Group’s key property assets that were not valued as part of the

ordinary cycle ending on 31 December 2024. Table 8 summarises the most recent market value for all

of MCK’s hotel properties (refer to Appendix 3 for details on the valuer, value methodology and key

assumptions).

Table 8: MCK Property Portfolio Market Valuation Summary (as of 31 December 2024)

Property/Location

# of Rooms /

Sqm

Property

Valuation

($m)

Value per

Room / Sqm

Valuation

reporting

date

MSocial Hotel Auckland 190 97,500 513 31-Dec-24

Copthorne Hotel Auckland City 106 10,750 101 31-Dec-24

Copthorne Hotel Bay of Islands (49% owned) 180 19,250 107 31-Dec-24

The Mayfair Hotel Christchurch

1

67 31,900 476 22-Jan-25

Kingsgate Hotel Dunedin 55 5,200 95 31-Jan-25

Copthorne Hotel Greymouth 53 11,000 208 31-Jan-25

Millennium Hotel New Plymouth Waterfront 42 11,250 268 31-Dec-24

Copthorne Hotel Palmerston North 76 10,200 134 31-Dec-24

Millennium Queenstown 220 100,000 455 11-Feb-25

Copthorne Hotel & Resort Queenstown Lakefront 240 82,000 342 11-Feb-25

Copthorne Hotel & Resort Queenstown Lakeview 85 21,940 258 31-Jan-25

Millennium Rotorua 228 66,000 289 11-Feb-25

Copthorne Hotel Rotorua 58

2

10,100 174 31-Dec-24

Kingsgate Hotel Te Anau 69 10,000 145 31-Jan-25

Copthorne Hotel Wellington Oriental Bay 118 22,750 193 31-Dec-24

Hotels 1,787 509,840 273

Hotels Surplus Land

3

35,106 34,483 1.0

Sofitel Brisbane JV (50%)

4

416 110,305 512

Sydney Apartments

5

2,181 22,894 10.5


Total Value of MCK Properties (Ex. CDI) 677,522

Sources: Property valuation reports from CVAS (NZ) Limited trading as Colliers and Bower Valuations Limited, unless noted

otherwise. MCK purchase price announcements.

1

The Mayfair Hotel Christchurch value based on the purchase price (transaction settled on 22 January 2025).

2

Although Copthorne Rotorua has 136 rooms available, only 58 are currently utilised.

3

Includes surplus land adjacent to Copthorne Hotel Queenstown Lakefront (value as of 31-Jan-25), to Copthorne Hotel Palmerston

North (value as of 31-Dec-24), to Copthorne Hotel Rotorua (value as of 31-Dec-24), to Kingsgate Hotel Te Anau (value as of 31-Jan-

25), and land purchased in Whangarei on 19-Aug-24 for the development of a hotel.

4

Sofitel Brisbane JV value based on book value of MCK’s share (including advances) as of 31 December 2024 (hotel acquired on 15

December 2023).

5

Sydney apartments value based on man ag ement’s es timat e of ne t re alisable value of AU$20.8m.

3.8.2. CDI Property Portfolio

A summary of CDI’s development and investment property portfolio is set out in Table 9. As at 31

December 2024, the market value of CDI’s properties totalled $422.8m (as reported by CDI),

comprising $357.8m of residential land and $65.1m of commercial investment property (as reported by

MCK).

Table 9: CDI Property Portfolio Market Valuation Summary (31 December 2024)

Property Location Size (ha)

Property

Valuation ($m)

Hobsonville & Trig Roads Whenuapai 13.8

Gordonton, Puketaha & Greenhill Roads Hamilton 132.5

Arataki Road Havelock North 11.2

Iona & Middle Roads Havelock North 70.1

Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 24

Profile of MCK

Pelorus Sound Marlborough 11.8

Lucas Terrace Nelson 3.1

Highland Drive Richmond 10.8

Stonebrook - Lot 2 (Stage 27) Rolleston 0.04

Prestons Park Christchurch 91.1

Worsleys Road Christchurch 29.8

Wairakei Road / Stanleys Road Christchurch 10.1

Total Land Development Projects

384.3 357.8

Burnside Road / Diversey Lane Wiri, Auckland 3.9

Stonebrook Retail Centre Rolleston 0.3

Prestons Park Commercial Centre Christchurch 0.9

Investment Properties

5.0 65.1

Total Value of CDI Properties

422.8

Sources: MCK and CDI FY24 financial results.

CDI has historically reported assets at historical cost (less depreciation where relevant). The $357.8m

market value for CDI’s land development property compares to a 31 December 2024 carrying value of

$251.4m while the $65.1m for the investment property compares to a carrying value of $36.3m.

3.8.3. MCK Adjusted NAV

MCK’s reported net asset value per share attributable to MCK shareholders (“NAV”) as at 31 December

2024 was $3.46 based on the carrying values of MCK Group’s properties. However, this would be

much higher if the properties were valued at market value consistent with MCK’s accounting policy prior

to FY21. The market value of MCK Group’s properties is approximately $356m higher than the carrying

value. All else equal and without considering potential tax implications, this would translate to a NAV for

MCK Group of $5.71 per share (net of CDI minority interests) as summarised in Figure 17

5

.

Figure 17: Adjusted NAV for MCK Group at 31 December 2024


Source: FY24 financial results, Northington Partners assessment of adjusted NAV.

3.9. Outlook

Overall, the outlook for the New Zealand hotel sector remains positive, driven by increasing

international visitor numbers and the expected recovery in the domestic economy. These factors are

set to more than offset the recent and anticipated increases in hotel room capacity.

MCK’s future performance will be significantly influenced by the following:

- Ongoing recovery in international arrivals which are expected to reach pre-pandemic levels by

2027.

- The upcoming completion of the International Convention Centre in Auckland in 2026 is

expected to generate significant demand, particularly for business and convention-related travel.


5

Our assessment of adjusted NAV per share of $5.71 differs to the “Net Asset Backing Per Share on market value basis” of $5.39 reported in MCK’s FY24

financial results. This difference is mainly due to the fact that the Company allows for an increase in deferred tax liability on the property revaluations which

we have ignored as they would be unlikely to crystallise (due to capital gains being tax free in New Zealand if the properties are not held with the intention

of resale).

$2.25$5.71

$3.46

NAV 31 Dec 2024Property @ FMVAdjusted NAV

Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 23
Profile of MCK

Although MCK no longer records the value of its hotels, developments and investment properties at fair

market value, these assets are periodically independently valued for impairment testing purposes.

These valuations are typically undertaken on a triennial rotating basis with all assets having been

revalued in the last three years. However, following the Offer from CDL, MCK’s valuers have provided

desktop valuation updates for all of the Group’s key property assets that were not valued as part of the

ordinary cycle ending on 31 December 2024. Table 8 summarises the most recent market value for all

of MCK’s hotel properties (refer to Appendix 3 for details on the valuer, value methodology and key

assumptions).

Table 8: MCK Property Portfolio Market Valuation Summary (as of 31 December 2024)

Property/Location

# of Rooms /

Sqm

Property

Valuation

($m)

Value per

Room / Sqm

Valuation

reporting

date

MSocial Hotel Auckland 190 97,500 513 31-Dec-24

Copthorne Hotel Auckland City 106 10,750 101 31-Dec-24

Copthorne Hotel Bay of Islands (49% owned) 180 19,250 107 31-Dec-24

The Mayfair Hotel Christchurch

1

67 31,900 476 22-Jan-25

Kingsgate Hotel Dunedin 55 5,200 95 31-Jan-25

Copthorne Hotel Greymouth 53 11,000 208 31-Jan-25

Millennium Hotel New Plymouth Waterfront 42 11,250 268 31-Dec-24

Copthorne Hotel Palmerston North 76 10,200 134 31-Dec-24

Millennium Queenstown 220 100,000 455 11-Feb-25

Copthorne Hotel & Resort Queenstown Lakefront 240 82,000 342 11-Feb-25

Copthorne Hotel & Resort Queenstown Lakeview 85 21,940 258 31-Jan-25

Millennium Rotorua 228 66,000 289 11-Feb-25

Copthorne Hotel Rotorua 58

2

10,100 174 31-Dec-24

Kingsgate Hotel Te Anau 69 10,000 145 31-Jan-25

Copthorne Hotel Wellington Oriental Bay 118 22,750 193 31-Dec-24

Hotels 1,787 509,840 273

Hotels Surplus Land

3

35,106 34,483 1.0

Sofitel Brisbane JV (50%)

4

416 110,305 512

Sydney Apartments

5

2,181 22,894 10.5


Total Value of MCK Properties (Ex. CDI) 677,522

Sources: Property valuation reports from CVAS (NZ) Limited trading as Colliers and Bower Valuations Limited, unless noted

otherwise. MCK purchase price announcements.

1

The Mayfair Hotel Christchurch value based on the purchase price (transaction settled on 22 January 2025).

2

Although Copthorne Rotorua has 136 rooms available, only 58 are currently utilised.

3

Includes surplus land adjacent to Copthorne Hotel Queenstown Lakefront (value as of 31-Jan-25), to Copthorne Hotel Palmerston

North (value as of 31-Dec-24), to Copthorne Hotel Rotorua (value as of 31-Dec-24), to Kingsgate Hotel Te Anau (value as of 31-Jan-

25), and land purchased in Whangarei on 19-Aug-24 for the development of a hotel.

4

Sofitel Brisbane JV value based on book value of MCK’s share (including advances) as of 31 December 2024 (hotel acquired on 15

December 2023).

5

Sydney apartments value based on man ag ement’s es timat e of ne t re alisable value of AU$20.8m.

3.8.2. CDI Property Portfolio

A summary of CDI’s development and investment property portfolio is set out in Table 9. As at 31

December 2024, the market value of CDI’s properties totalled $422.8m (as reported by CDI),

comprising $357.8m of residential land and $65.1m of commercial investment property (as reported by

MCK).

Table 9: CDI Property Portfolio Market Valuation Summary (31 December 2024)

Property Location Size (ha)

Property

Valuation ($m)

Hobsonville & Trig Roads Whenuapai 13.8

Gordonton, Puketaha & Greenhill Roads Hamilton 132.5

Arataki Road Havelock North 11.2

Iona & Middle Roads Havelock North 70.1

Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 24

Profile of MCK

Pelorus Sound Marlborough 11.8

Lucas Terrace Nelson 3.1

Highland Drive Richmond 10.8

Stonebrook - Lot 2 (Stage 27) Rolleston 0.04

Prestons Park Christchurch 91.1

Worsleys Road Christchurch 29.8

Wairakei Road / Stanleys Road Christchurch 10.1

Total Land Development Projects

384.3 357.8

Burnside Road / Diversey Lane Wiri, Auckland 3.9

Stonebrook Retail Centre Rolleston 0.3

Prestons Park Commercial Centre Christchurch 0.9

Investment Properties

5.0 65.1

Total Value of CDI Properties

422.8

Sources: MCK and CDI FY24 financial results.

CDI has historically reported assets at historical cost (less depreciation where relevant). The $357.8m

market value for CDI’s land development property compares to a 31 December 2024 carrying value of

$251.4m while the $65.1m for the investment property compares to a carrying value of $36.3m.

3.8.3. MCK Adjusted NAV

MCK’s reported net asset value per share attributable to MCK shareholders (“NAV”) as at 31 December

2024 was $3.46 based on the carrying values of MCK Group’s properties. However, this would be

much higher if the properties were valued at market value consistent with MCK’s accounting policy prior

to FY21. The market value of MCK Group’s properties is approximately $356m higher than the carrying

value. All else equal and without considering potential tax implications, this would translate to a NAV for

MCK Group of $5.71 per share (net of CDI minority interests) as summarised in Figure 17

5

.

Figure 17: Adjusted NAV for MCK Group at 31 December 2024


Source: FY24 financial results, Northington Partners assessment of adjusted NAV.

3.9. Outlook

Overall, the outlook for the New Zealand hotel sector remains positive, driven by increasing

international visitor numbers and the expected recovery in the domestic economy. These factors are

set to more than offset the recent and anticipated increases in hotel room capacity.

MCK’s future performance will be significantly influenced by the following:

- Ongoing recovery in international arrivals which are expected to reach pre-pandemic levels by

2027.

- The upcoming completion of the International Convention Centre in Auckland in 2026 is

expected to generate significant demand, particularly for business and convention-related travel.


5

Our assessment of adjusted NAV per share of $5.71 differs to the “Net Asset Backing Per Share on market value basis” of $5.39 reported in MCK’s FY24

financial results. This difference is mainly due to the fact that the Company allows for an increase in deferred tax liability on the property revaluations which

we have ignored as they would be unlikely to crystallise (due to capital gains being tax free in New Zealand if the properties are not held with the intention

of resale).

$2.25$5.71

$3.46

NAV 31 Dec 2024Property @ FMVAdjusted NAV

APPENDIX: INDEPENDENT ADVISER’S REPORT

Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 25
Profile of MCK

- The improvement in the domestic economy is also expected to add further demand for hotel

accommodation. As business confidence returns, there is likely to be increased demand from

the corporate sector, while an uplift in disposable income and consumer confidence will drive

more domestic tourism, especially for leisure and entertainment purposes.

Other key factors which are likely to affect the outlook for MCK include the following:

- The improving sector outlook is reflected in the number of hotels recently completed or planned.

Although increasing supply would be expected to suppress occupancy and ADRs, this effect has

not yet been observed in the data. In the short to medium-term, we expect demand to increase

faster than the sector can add new capacity.

- The labour shortages which had a material impact on hotel operations since Covid-19 have

largely been addressed. With a more stable workforce now in place, hotels have been able to

increase room availability and improve service delivery, helping to accommodate the growing

tourist numbers.

- Increasing demand supporting increased ADRs and RevPAR, particularly offsetting recent cost

pressures.

CDI’s outlook will be influenced by the following:

- CDI’s residential development business is inherently cyclical, with performance closely tied to

market conditions and broader economic trends. In a declining interest rate environment, we

expect the property market to show signs of improvement, supporting stronger demand.

- CDI holds a strong portfolio of highly prospective sites and recently completed developments

that position the business well to capitalise on improving market conditions. CDI is already

showing early signs of recovery with sales and earnings in FY24 representing a significant

improvement over FY23.



Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 26

Valuation of MCK

4.0 Valuation of MCK

4.1. Valuation Methodology

Our valuation of MCK has been prepared on the basis of “fair value”. The generally accepted definition

of fair value (and that applied by us in forming our opinion) is the value agreed in a hypothetical

transaction between a knowledgeable, willing, but not anxious buyer and a knowledgeable, willing, but

not anxious seller, acting at arm’s length. Our assessment of equity value is based on a 100% control

position.

The most reliable evidence as to the value of a business or asset is the price at which the business or

closely comparable businesses have been bought and sold in an arm’s length transaction. In the

absence of direct market evidence, estimates of value are made using a range of methodologies. In

most cases, value is determined as a function of the estimated level of cash returns that the business is

expected to generate in the future. The specific approach that is used to estimate this value is

dependent on the nature of the business and the expectations regarding future performance.

The primary valuation methodologies commonly used for valuing businesses include:

- Multiple approach: This method determines value by applying a valuation multiple to the

assessed level of maintainable earnings or other value benchmark (e.g. book value per share)

where the multiple is chosen to reflect both the investment characteristics (growth, overhead

costs, etc) and the risk associated with the future performance of the business.

- Discounted Cash flows: A DCF approach is based on an explicit forecast of the annual cash

flows that will be generated over a specified forecast period. The value of cash flows expected

beyond the explicit forecast period is incorporated into the valuation process by capitalising an

estimate of maintainable cash flows for the terminal period.


-

Orderly realisation of assets: This method involves an estimate of the net proceeds which

would be available following the orderly liquidation of company assets and the resulting net

surplus available for distribution to shareholders.


Given the nature of MCK’s assets, we suggest that the most appropriate measure of fair value for MCK

involves a combination of valuation approaches. This in part reflects that MCK’s hotel business

earnings may still be adversely affected by the legacy impacts of Covid-19 (as discussed in Section 2.2)

and that a multiple approach may not fully reflect the underlying value for MCK’s hotel land and

buildings (which may also have higher alternate use value). Similarly, MCK’s residential development

activities (through CDI) generate lumpy cash flows depending on the prevailing stage and timeframe for

the development portfolio, and that means an earnings approach is inappropriate. The value of MCK

will also be influenced by the investment objectives of the controlling shareholder whose strategy may

differ to other minority shareholders and may not necessarily represent the value maximising strategy

for all shareholders in the short term. It could therefore be the case that winding-up the business will

deliver greater value in the short term compared to continuing to operate as a going concern.

Based on the unique characteristics of MCK’s hotel and property investments, we have assessed

MCK’s value on a component “sum-of-the-parts” basis both as a going concern (“Going Concern

Value”) and under an orderly realisation of assets through the sale of its hotel and residential and

investment properties (“Wind-up Value”).

The Going Concern Value utilises EBITDA multiples for the NZ Hotels business and recent market

valuations (as at 31 December 2024) for all other assets held through MCK and CDI. In contrast, the

Wind-up Value simply utilises market valuations for all Group assets (including the hotels owned by

MCK) with assumptions regarding the length of the sell-down period, the level of net income generated

over the sell-down period and the estimated costs that will be incurred to execute the sell-down.

Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 25
Profile of MCK

- The improvement in the domestic economy is also expected to add further demand for hotel

accommodation. As business confidence returns, there is likely to be increased demand from

the corporate sector, while an uplift in disposable income and consumer confidence will drive

more domestic tourism, especially for leisure and entertainment purposes.

Other key factors which are likely to affect the outlook for MCK include the following:

- The improving sector outlook is reflected in the number of hotels recently completed or planned.

Although increasing supply would be expected to suppress occupancy and ADRs, this effect has

not yet been observed in the data. In the short to medium-term, we expect demand to increase

faster than the sector can add new capacity.

- The labour shortages which had a material impact on hotel operations since Covid-19 have

largely been addressed. With a more stable workforce now in place, hotels have been able to

increase room availability and improve service delivery, helping to accommodate the growing

tourist numbers.

- Increasing demand supporting increased ADRs and RevPAR, particularly offsetting recent cost

pressures.

CDI’s outlook will be influenced by the following:

- CDI’s residential development business is inherently cyclical, with performance closely tied to

market conditions and broader economic trends. In a declining interest rate environment, we

expect the property market to show signs of improvement, supporting stronger demand.

- CDI holds a strong portfolio of highly prospective sites and recently completed developments

that position the business well to capitalise on improving market conditions. CDI is already

showing early signs of recovery with sales and earnings in FY24 representing a significant

improvement over FY23.



Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 26

Valuation of MCK

4.0 Valuation of MCK

4.1. Valuation Methodology

Our valuation of MCK has been prepared on the basis of “fair value”. The generally accepted definition

of fair value (and that applied by us in forming our opinion) is the value agreed in a hypothetical

transaction between a knowledgeable, willing, but not anxious buyer and a knowledgeable, willing, but

not anxious seller, acting at arm’s length. Our assessment of equity value is based on a 100% control

position.

The most reliable evidence as to the value of a business or asset is the price at which the business or

closely comparable businesses have been bought and sold in an arm’s length transaction. In the

absence of direct market evidence, estimates of value are made using a range of methodologies. In

most cases, value is determined as a function of the estimated level of cash returns that the business is

expected to generate in the future. The specific approach that is used to estimate this value is

dependent on the nature of the business and the expectations regarding future performance.

The primary valuation methodologies commonly used for valuing businesses include:

- Multiple approach: This method determines value by applying a valuation multiple to the

assessed level of maintainable earnings or other value benchmark (e.g. book value per share)

where the multiple is chosen to reflect both the investment characteristics (growth, overhead

costs, etc) and the risk associated with the future performance of the business.

- Discounted Cash flows: A DCF approach is based on an explicit forecast of the annual cash

flows that will be generated over a specified forecast period. The value of cash flows expected

beyond the explicit forecast period is incorporated into the valuation process by capitalising an

estimate of maintainable cash flows for the terminal period.


-

Orderly realisation of assets: This method involves an estimate of the net proceeds which

would be available following the orderly liquidation of company assets and the resulting net

surplus available for distribution to shareholders.


Given the nature of MCK’s assets, we suggest that the most appropriate measure of fair value for MCK

involves a combination of valuation approaches. This in part reflects that MCK’s hotel business

earnings may still be adversely affected by the legacy impacts of Covid-19 (as discussed in Section 2.2)

and that a multiple approach may not fully reflect the underlying value for MCK’s hotel land and

buildings (which may also have higher alternate use value). Similarly, MCK’s residential development

activities (through CDI) generate lumpy cash flows depending on the prevailing stage and timeframe for

the development portfolio, and that means an earnings approach is inappropriate. The value of MCK

will also be influenced by the investment objectives of the controlling shareholder whose strategy may

differ to other minority shareholders and may not necessarily represent the value maximising strategy

for all shareholders in the short term. It could therefore be the case that winding-up the business will

deliver greater value in the short term compared to continuing to operate as a going concern.

Based on the unique characteristics of MCK’s hotel and property investments, we have assessed

MCK’s value on a component “sum-of-the-parts” basis both as a going concern (“Going Concern

Value”) and under an orderly realisation of assets through the sale of its hotel and residential and

investment properties (“Wind-up Value”).

The Going Concern Value utilises EBITDA multiples for the NZ Hotels business and recent market

valuations (as at 31 December 2024) for all other assets held through MCK and CDI. In contrast, the

Wind-up Value simply utilises market valuations for all Group assets (including the hotels owned by

MCK) with assumptions regarding the length of the sell-down period, the level of net income generated

over the sell-down period and the estimated costs that will be incurred to execute the sell-down.


APPENDIX: INDEPENDENT ADVISER’S REPORT


Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 27

Valuation of MCK

Table 10 summarises the value approach adopted for each of the asset categories owned by MCK.

Table 10: Summary of Valuation Methodologies for MCK

Group Company Value Component Valuation Approach

MCK

NZ Hotels - EBITDA multiple (Going Concern)

- Updated valuations of the hotel portfolio as at 31

December 2024 (Wind-up)

Sofitel Brisbane JV & Sydney

Apartments

- Book value for Sofitel Brisbane JV (acquired in

December 2023)

- Management’s e sti mate of net real isable val ue for

the Sydney Apartments

Overheads

- MCK allocation incorporated into EBITDA (Going

Concern)

- Net earnings over realisation period (Wind-up)

CDI

Residential Land Development - 31 December 2024 market valuation

Investment Properties - 31 December 2024 market valuation

Overheads - Multiple of CDI allocated overheads

4.2. Treatment of Redeemable Preference Shares

MCK’s RPS are a unique aspect of its capital structure that confer different rights to the holders

compared to those that apply to MCK’s ordinary shares. The key terms of the RPS as they relate to the

valuation of MCK are summarised in Table 11:

Table 11: MCK RPS Key Terms

RPS outstanding

52,739,543

Voting rights

Non-voting other than on matters relating to the RPS

Rights to

distribution

The RPS have equal rights to all distributions (including dividends) made by MCK

except for distributions made under a liquidation (see below)

Redemption The RPS have no maturity date but are redeemable at the Company’s election

subject to having first received the approval of RPS holders. RPS approval requires

a special resolution (75% or more of the votes cast on the resolution to redeem) and

may be voted on by CDL. Given CDL holds 91.3% of the RPS, it is in a position to

unilaterally approve any special resolution.

If the RPS are redeemed, the redemption amount per RPS is the higher of:

- The 20-day volume weighted average price for the RPS on NZX ($1.80 as at

13 February 2025); and

- $0.64, being the original issue price for the RPS

Liquidation

preference

On a liquidation of MCK (as contemplated for a hypothetical wind-up of the business

underlying our Wind-up Value), the RPS rank ahead of ordinary shareholders in

relation to any net surplus proceeds available for distribution.

On a return of surplus assets, the proceeds will be applied between RPS holders

and ordinary shareholders as follows:

- In first priority, up to $0.64 per RPS (being the original issue price for the RPS)

to RPS holders;

- Secondly, the balance will be allocated to ordinary shareholders on a pro rata

basis amongst ordinary shareholders up to $0.64 per ordinary share;

- Finally, in the event of a remaining surplus above this level, all RPS and

ordinary shareholders rank equally on the distribution of the remaining surplus.

In effect, this means that upon a liquidation of MCK, if the available surplus is above

approximately $101.2m (being the application of the above waterfall distribution to

ensure RPS holders and ordinary shareholders each receive at least $0.64 per

share), RPS and ordinary shareholders will then each receive the same value per

share. That is, total proceeds will be distributed equally across all 158,218,286

shares on issue (being the number of both RPS and ordinary shares).


We would expect the price performance of the RPS to mirror the MCK ordinary shares through time

because they have an equal right to any distributions, although the RPS should trade at a discount

because they have no voting influence on key decisions of MCK. The price history for both the ordinary

shares and the RPS are shown in Figure 18. Over the last 5 years, the price relativity of the RPS has


Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 28

Valuation of MCK

fluctuated between a premium and discount to the ordinary shares with an average premium of ~4%.

While this is counterintuitive, we suggest this simply reflects the lack of liquidity in both securities rather

than reflecting the underlying value of the RPS relative to the ordinary shares.

Figure 18: MCK RPS Price Performance Relative to MCK


Source: IRESS

The assumed treatment of the RPS introduces an additional element to our valuation due to their

redemption rights and the likely outcome in the event of a managed liquidation. In this respect, we note

that CDL controls 91.3% of the RPS and can vote on key matters relating to the RPS, including any

possibility of redemption. CDL therefore effectively controls how the RPS will be manged in the future

and we assume that it would vote in a way that maximises the total value to CDL across its holding in

both the ordinary shares and RPS.

The Offer does not apply to the RPS because these are not considered equity securities for the

purposes of the Code. However, the Offer document states that independently of the Offer, CDL is

willing to acquire the RPS at $1.70 per share through its broker on the NZX Main Board. CDL has also

stated it may elect to seek to have the RPS redeemed, if CDL is successful in acquiring all of the

outstanding ordinary shares of MCK. Based on the redemption terms and recent RPS pricing, this

would imply a value of $1.80 per RPS (based on 20-day VWAP as at 13 February).

Unless the RPS consistently traded at a material premium to the ordinary shares (which is very unlikely

in anything other than distress scenarios), we believe there is no commercial incentive for CDL to have

the RPS redeemed. That is, considering its relative ownership of RPS and ordinary shares, the total

economic interest held by CDL in MCK will be maximised if the RPS are not redeemed.

We have therefore assumed for the purposes of both our Going Concern Value and Wind-up Value that

the number of MCK shares on issue is the fully diluted number including both the ordinary shares and

RPS. Considering the value range we have assessed for the Company (as set out below), we believe

that it is always in CDL’s best interest to ensure the RPS are treated in the same way as ordinary

shares (and not redeemed).

4.3. FY25 Earnings Projection

While we have not entirely relied on an earnings-based approach to support our valuation, the valuation

framework includes:

- a multiple based assessment for the NZ Hotels business (as a component of the Going

Concern Value);

- the value impact of certain corporate overheads (both for the Going Concern Value and Wind-

up Value); and

- estimated net income generated by the business over the assumed realisation period (as a

component of the Wind-up Value).

The projected earnings for the MCK business therefore remain important inputs to both our Going

Concern and Wind-up Values. MCK has provided detailed management projections for FY25 based on

key assumptions for each of the component businesses, including hotel occupancy, ADRs and RevPAR

$1.00

$1.25

$1.50

$1.75

$2.00

$2.25

$2.50

$2.75

MCK OrdsMCK RPS


Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 27

Valuation of MCK

Table 10 summarises the value approach adopted for each of the asset categories owned by MCK.

Table 10: Summary of Valuation Methodologies for MCK

Group Company Value Component Valuation Approach

MCK

NZ Hotels - EBITDA multiple (Going Concern)

- Updated valuations of the hotel portfolio as at 31

December 2024 (Wind-up)

Sofitel Brisbane JV & Sydney

Apartments

- Book value for Sofitel Brisbane JV (acquired in

December 2023)

- Management’s e sti mate of net real isable val ue for

the Sydney Apartments

Overheads

- MCK allocation incorporated into EBITDA (Going

Concern)

- Net earnings over realisation period (Wind-up)

CDI

Residential Land Development - 31 December 2024 market valuation

Investment Properties - 31 December 2024 market valuation

Overheads - Multiple of CDI allocated overheads

4.2. Treatment of Redeemable Preference Shares

MCK’s RPS are a unique aspect of its capital structure that confer different rights to the holders

compared to those that apply to MCK’s ordinary shares. The key terms of the RPS as they relate to the

valuation of MCK are summarised in Table 11:

Table 11: MCK RPS Key Terms

RPS outstanding

52,739,543

Voting rights

Non-voting other than on matters relating to the RPS

Rights to

distribution

The RPS have equal rights to all distributions (including dividends) made by MCK

except for distributions made under a liquidation (see below)

Redemption The RPS have no maturity date but are redeemable at the Company’s election

subject to having first received the approval of RPS holders. RPS approval requires

a special resolution (75% or more of the votes cast on the resolution to redeem) and

may be voted on by CDL. Given CDL holds 91.3% of the RPS, it is in a position to

unilaterally approve any special resolution.

If the RPS are redeemed, the redemption amount per RPS is the higher of:

- The 20-day volume weighted average price for the RPS on NZX ($1.80 as at

13 February 2025); and

- $0.64, being the original issue price for the RPS

Liquidation

preference

On a liquidation of MCK (as contemplated for a hypothetical wind-up of the business

underlying our Wind-up Value), the RPS rank ahead of ordinary shareholders in

relation to any net surplus proceeds available for distribution.

On a return of surplus assets, the proceeds will be applied between RPS holders

and ordinary shareholders as follows:

- In first priority, up to $0.64 per RPS (being the original issue price for the RPS)

to RPS holders;

- Secondly, the balance will be allocated to ordinary shareholders on a pro rata

basis amongst ordinary shareholders up to $0.64 per ordinary share;

- Finally, in the event of a remaining surplus above this level, all RPS and

ordinary shareholders rank equally on the distribution of the remaining surplus.

In effect, this means that upon a liquidation of MCK, if the available surplus is above

approximately $101.2m (being the application of the above waterfall distribution to

ensure RPS holders and ordinary shareholders each receive at least $0.64 per

share), RPS and ordinary shareholders will then each receive the same value per

share. That is, total proceeds will be distributed equally across all 158,218,286

shares on issue (being the number of both RPS and ordinary shares).


We would expect the price performance of the RPS to mirror the MCK ordinary shares through time

because they have an equal right to any distributions, although the RPS should trade at a discount

because they have no voting influence on key decisions of MCK. The price history for both the ordinary

shares and the RPS are shown in Figure 18. Over the last 5 years, the price relativity of the RPS has


Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 28

Valuation of MCK

fluctuated between a premium and discount to the ordinary shares with an average premium of ~4%.

While this is counterintuitive, we suggest this simply reflects the lack of liquidity in both securities rather

than reflecting the underlying value of the RPS relative to the ordinary shares.

Figure 18: MCK RPS Price Performance Relative to MCK


Source: IRESS

The assumed treatment of the RPS introduces an additional element to our valuation due to their

redemption rights and the likely outcome in the event of a managed liquidation. In this respect, we note

that CDL controls 91.3% of the RPS and can vote on key matters relating to the RPS, including any

possibility of redemption. CDL therefore effectively controls how the RPS will be manged in the future

and we assume that it would vote in a way that maximises the total value to CDL across its holding in

both the ordinary shares and RPS.

The Offer does not apply to the RPS because these are not considered equity securities for the

purposes of the Code. However, the Offer document states that independently of the Offer, CDL is

willing to acquire the RPS at $1.70 per share through its broker on the NZX Main Board. CDL has also

stated it may elect to seek to have the RPS redeemed, if CDL is successful in acquiring all of the

outstanding ordinary shares of MCK. Based on the redemption terms and recent RPS pricing, this

would imply a value of $1.80 per RPS (based on 20-day VWAP as at 13 February).

Unless the RPS consistently traded at a material premium to the ordinary shares (which is very unlikely

in anything other than distress scenarios), we believe there is no commercial incentive for CDL to have

the RPS redeemed. That is, considering its relative ownership of RPS and ordinary shares, the total

economic interest held by CDL in MCK will be maximised if the RPS are not redeemed.

We have therefore assumed for the purposes of both our Going Concern Value and Wind-up Value that

the number of MCK shares on issue is the fully diluted number including both the ordinary shares and

RPS. Considering the value range we have assessed for the Company (as set out below), we believe

that it is always in CDL’s best interest to ensure the RPS are treated in the same way as ordinary

shares (and not redeemed).

4.3. FY25 Earnings Projection

While we have not entirely relied on an earnings-based approach to support our valuation, the valuation

framework includes:

- a multiple based assessment for the NZ Hotels business (as a component of the Going

Concern Value);

- the value impact of certain corporate overheads (both for the Going Concern Value and Wind-

up Value); and

- estimated net income generated by the business over the assumed realisation period (as a

component of the Wind-up Value).

The projected earnings for the MCK business therefore remain important inputs to both our Going

Concern and Wind-up Values. MCK has provided detailed management projections for FY25 based on

key assumptions for each of the component businesses, including hotel occupancy, ADRs and RevPAR

$1.00

$1.25

$1.50

$1.75

$2.00

$2.25

$2.50

$2.75

MCK OrdsMCK RPS

APPENDIX: INDEPENDENT ADVISER’S REPORT


Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 29

Valuation of MCK

for the NZ Hotels and Sofitel Brisbane JV, and gross development realisations, costs and timing for the

residential developments. Table 12 provides a summary of the FY25 budget for NZ Hotels and the total

MCK business as well as a comparison to FY24 actual results.

Table 12: MCK FY25 Projections vs FY24 Actuals

Segment

FY24

Actual ($m)

FY25

Budget ($m)

Key Budget Assumptions

NZ Hotels $109.5 $134.4 - Overall occupancy rate increases from 67%

to 74%; ADR increases by 3.4%; Additional

contribution from Mayfair Christchurch

Sydney Apartments

$17.6 - Rental income and sale of 12 units

CDI

$49.1 - Property sales and rental income

Total Revenue

$176.2 $202.2

Hotels $17.4 $23.9 - Increase margin resulting from improved

performance and scale

Sydney Apartments $8.8 - Margin on apartment unit sales

CDI $25.0 - CDI property sales mix

Total EBITDA

$51.1 $48.5

Source: MCK FY24 draft annual report; MCK management projections for FY25.

We have tested the reasonableness of the FY25 budget relative to the key input assumptions,

particularly those relating to the NZ Hotels and do not believe any adjustments are required. To support

the Wind-Up Scenario, we have extrapolated the FY25 MCK Group budget out for a further two years to

incorporate our assessment of income from the hotel and property portfolio over the assumed

realisation period (2-3 years). The key Wind-up Value assumptions are detailed in Section 4.5.

4.4. Going Concern Value

4.4.1. NZ Hotels

In determining the Going Concern Value for the NZ Hotels, we have reviewed enterprise value (“EV”) to

EBITDA multiples for available market evidence of comparable companies and transactions. This

benchmarking exercise considers the particular characteristics of the comparable entities or

transactions, including the nature of the assets and form of management (asset heavy property

ownership vs asset light hotel management / franchise / lease). Some of the evidence also includes the

implied multiples MCK has recently paid for its own individual acquisitions including Mayfair

Christchurch and Sofitel Brisbane.

We have elected EBITDA multiples (based on IFRS16 reporting) to assess the Going Concern Value of

the NZ Hotels due to the following key considerations:

− EBITDA is a frequently use valuation metric to assess the value of a company and is not

affected by differences in earnings caused by varying capital structures and depreciation and

amortisation policies;

− It is a commonly used measure by companies in the hotel management industry (including

MCK) to assess performance and the values of property acquisitions; and

− EBITDA is the most frequently available multiple for available hotel sector transaction evidence.

Table 13 summarises the implied EV/forecast EBITDA multiples for comparable listed hotel operators

(asset light and asset heavy) while Table 14 summarises multiples for available transaction evidence.

Appendix 4 provides more details of the companies and transactions used.




Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 30

Valuation of MCK

Table 13: EBITDA Multiples of Comparable Trading Companies


EV/EBITDA Multiple

LTM NTM

Asset-light hotel operators

Average 20.2 x 16.1 x

Median 21.5 x 15.8 x

Asset-heavy hotel operators

Average 14.8 x 12.7 x

Median 13.8 x 12.8 x

Source: S&P Capital IQ (10 February 2025)

Table 14: EBITDA Multiples of Comparable Transactions

Target Acquirer Location Date

Implied EV

/ LTM

EBITDA

Implied EV

/ NTM

EBITDA

Millennium & Copthorne Related Transactions



Mayfair Christchurch MCK New Zealand Oct 2024 n/a 15.0 x

Sofitel Brisbane MCK & City

Developments Ltd

Australia Dec 2023 n/a 17.9 x

Millennium & Copthorne

Hotels plc (35% share)

City Developments Ltd United

Kingdom

Jun 2019 16.5 x 16.2 x

Average


16.5 x 16.4 x

Median


16.5 x 16.2 x

Other Transactions


Average 14.4 x 12.6 x

Median 13.5 x

11.6 x

Average (Overall) 14.5 x

14.0 x

Median (Overall) 13.5 x

14.2 x

Source: S&P Capital IQ (10 February 2025) MCK, and Northington Partners’ estimates.

Based on the available comparable company and transaction evidence, we note the following:

− The implied trading multiples are based on share market prices for small parcels of shares and

therefore do not include a premium that would otherwise be observed in the context of an offer

that results in a controlling shareholding (i.e . the CDL Offer). Consequently, we would expect a

premium to the comparable company multiples in a change of control situation. Control

premiums are typically in a range between 20% and 40% but this depends on a variety of

company specific factors.

− When comparing MCK to the comparable companies for valuation benchmarking, we place

more emphasis on the hotel operators who also own the majority of their investment properties

(as opposed to hotel operators who predominantly franchise, manage or lease their hotels).

− In the absence of New Zealand hotel portfolio sale transactions, MCK’s own purchase of

Mayfair Christchurch in late 2024 and Sofitel Brisbane in 2023 provide useful evidence. We

understand the purchase prices were consistent with the valuations at the time of acquisition

and implied EBITDA multiples of 15.0x and 17.9x respectively.

Based on the comparable company and transaction evidence, we believe that an appropriate multiple

for MCK’s Hotels business is between 14x and 16x. This is consistent with comparable company

multiples for hotel operators when allowing for an appropriate control premium and key transaction

evidence. As noted above, the most direct evidence relates to MCK’s purchase of Mayfair Christchurch

(15.0x) and Sofitel Brisbane (17.9x) as well as CDL’s acquisition of Millenium Copthorne Plc, the former

UK listed hotel group similar to MCK (16.2x). Our selected multiple range for the full business is


Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 29

Valuation of MCK

for the NZ Hotels and Sofitel Brisbane JV, and gross development realisations, costs and timing for the

residential developments. Table 12 provides a summary of the FY25 budget for NZ Hotels and the total

MCK business as well as a comparison to FY24 actual results.

Table 12: MCK FY25 Projections vs FY24 Actuals

Segment

FY24

Actual ($m)

FY25

Budget ($m)

Key Budget Assumptions

NZ Hotels $109.5 $134.4 - Overall occupancy rate increases from 67%

to 74%; ADR increases by 3.4%; Additional

contribution from Mayfair Christchurch

Sydney Apartments

$17.6 - Rental income and sale of 12 units

CDI

$49.1 - Property sales and rental income

Total Revenue

$176.2 $202.2

Hotels $17.4 $23.9 - Increase margin resulting from improved

performance and scale

Sydney Apartments $8.8 - Margin on apartment unit sales

CDI $25.0 - CDI property sales mix

Total EBITDA

$51.1 $48.5

Source: MCK FY24 draft annual report; MCK management projections for FY25.

We have tested the reasonableness of the FY25 budget relative to the key input assumptions,

particularly those relating to the NZ Hotels and do not believe any adjustments are required. To support

the Wind-Up Scenario, we have extrapolated the FY25 MCK Group budget out for a further two years to

incorporate our assessment of income from the hotel and property portfolio over the assumed

realisation period (2-3 years). The key Wind-up Value assumptions are detailed in Section 4.5.

4.4. Going Concern Value

4.4.1. NZ Hotels

In determining the Going Concern Value for the NZ Hotels, we have reviewed enterprise value (“EV”) to

EBITDA multiples for available market evidence of comparable companies and transactions. This

benchmarking exercise considers the particular characteristics of the comparable entities or

transactions, including the nature of the assets and form of management (asset heavy property

ownership vs asset light hotel management / franchise / lease). Some of the evidence also includes the

implied multiples MCK has recently paid for its own individual acquisitions including Mayfair

Christchurch and Sofitel Brisbane.

We have elected EBITDA multiples (based on IFRS16 reporting) to assess the Going Concern Value of

the NZ Hotels due to the following key considerations:

− EBITDA is a frequently use valuation metric to assess the value of a company and is not

affected by differences in earnings caused by varying capital structures and depreciation and

amortisation policies;

− It is a commonly used measure by companies in the hotel management industry (including

MCK) to assess performance and the values of property acquisitions; and

− EBITDA is the most frequently available multiple for available hotel sector transaction evidence.

Table 13 summarises the implied EV/forecast EBITDA multiples for comparable listed hotel operators

(asset light and asset heavy) while Table 14 summarises multiples for available transaction evidence.

Appendix 4 provides more details of the companies and transactions used.




Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 30

Valuation of MCK

Table 13: EBITDA Multiples of Comparable Trading Companies


EV/EBITDA Multiple

LTM NTM

Asset-light hotel operators

Average 20.2 x 16.1 x

Median 21.5 x 15.8 x

Asset-heavy hotel operators

Average 14.8 x 12.7 x

Median 13.8 x 12.8 x

Source: S&P Capital IQ (10 February 2025)

Table 14: EBITDA Multiples of Comparable Transactions

Target Acquirer Location Date

Implied EV

/ LTM

EBITDA

Implied EV

/ NTM

EBITDA

Millennium & Copthorne Related Transactions



Mayfair Christchurch MCK New Zealand Oct 2024 n/a 15.0 x

Sofitel Brisbane MCK & City

Developments Ltd

Australia Dec 2023 n/a 17.9 x

Millennium & Copthorne

Hotels plc (35% share)

City Developments Ltd United

Kingdom

Jun 2019 16.5 x 16.2 x

Average


16.5 x 16.4 x

Median


16.5 x 16.2 x

Other Transactions


Average 14.4 x 12.6 x

Median 13.5 x

11.6 x

Average (Overall) 14.5 x

14.0 x

Median (Overall) 13.5 x 14.2 x

Source: S&P Capital IQ (10 February 2025) MCK, and Northington Partners’ estimates.

Based on the available comparable company and transaction evidence, we note the following:

− The implied trading multiples are based on share market prices for small parcels of shares and

therefore do not include a premium that would otherwise be observed in the context of an offer

that results in a controlling shareholding (i.e . the CDL Offer). Consequently, we would expect a

premium to the comparable company multiples in a change of control situation. Control

premiums are typically in a range between 20% and 40% but this depends on a variety of

company specific factors.

− When comparing MCK to the comparable companies for valuation benchmarking, we place

more emphasis on the hotel operators who also own the majority of their investment properties

(as opposed to hotel operators who predominantly franchise, manage or lease their hotels).

− In the absence of New Zealand hotel portfolio sale transactions, MCK’s own purchase of

Mayfair Christchurch in late 2024 and Sofitel Brisbane in 2023 provide useful evidence. We

understand the purchase prices were consistent with the valuations at the time of acquisition

and implied EBITDA multiples of 15.0x and 17.9x respectively.

Based on the comparable company and transaction evidence, we believe that an appropriate multiple

for MCK’s Hotels business is between 14x and 16x. This is consistent with comparable company

multiples for hotel operators when allowing for an appropriate control premium and key transaction

evidence. As noted above, the most direct evidence relates to MCK’s purchase of Mayfair Christchurch

(15.0x) and Sofitel Brisbane (17.9x) as well as CDL’s acquisition of Millenium Copthorne Plc, the former

UK listed hotel group similar to MCK (16.2x). Our selected multiple range for the full business is

APPENDIX: INDEPENDENT ADVISER’S REPORT


Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 31

Valuation of MCK

modestly lower than the average for these transactions to account for the varying quality of hotels

contained in the NZ Hotels portfolio.

Applying this multiple range to MCK’s FY25 budget EBITDA for the NZ Hotels segment of $32.7m (prior

to any allowance for corporate overheads) results in a value range of $458.1m - $523.5m. While this

value range is consistent with the current market valuations for the same hotel properties ($509.8m

excluding Sofitel Brisbane JV), it excludes the ongoing management overhead of administering and

managing the hotel portfolio. A total of ~$7.7m of corporate overheads has been allocated to NZ Hotels

within the MCK Group.

Our assessed value for the NZ Hotels portfolio is summarised in Table 15 below. After allowing for

overhead costs, our estimate of the Going Concern Value for NZ Hotels is in a range between $350.9m

and $401.1m.

Table 15: Going Concern Value for NZ Hotels


Low ($m) High ($m)

NZ Hotels FY25 EBITDA (pre Overheads) $32.7 $32.7

Allowance for NZ Hotels Corporate Overheads ($7.7) ($7.7)

NZ Hotels net EBITDA $25.1 $25.1

EBITDA Multiple 14.0x 16.0x

Enterprise Value $350.9 $401.1

4.4.2. Sofitel Brisbane JV, Surplus Land & Sydney Apartments

The adopted Going Concern Value for MCK Group’s NZ Hotels excludes certain MCK assets that do

not contribute to EBITDA, including:

− MCK’s 50% investment in Sofitel Brisbane. This is treated as an equity investment for

accounting purposes and its earnings contribution is not included in the FY25 budget EBITDA.

However, given this investment was acquired relatively recently (December 2023) and our

understanding that performance is meeting expectations, we suggest the value of MCK’s 50%

investment at the time of acquisition provides a suitable proxy for its current market value.

Based on the carrying value (including the purchase value and accumulated profits), we have

valued MCK’s 50% investment at $110.3m as of 31 December 2024.

− MCK’s surplus land at Queenstown, Te Anau, Palmerston North, Rotorua and Whangarei.

These land parcels provide scope for future hotel developments or could be sold as surplus

assets. We have added the 31 December 2024 market valuation of $34.5m for the surplus land

to our Going Concern Value with an allowance for +/-5% to account for uncertainty and risk

inherent in the valuation.

In addition, we have added the value of the 22 Sydney apartments owned by MCK. As these units are

expected to be sold within one year, we have adopted management’s est imate of the net realisable

value of $22.9m (with a +/-5% value range allowance).

4.4.3. CDI

As outlined in Section 4.1, we have valued CDI using the current market valuations for the residential

development and investment properties (detailed in Section 3.8.2) less an allowance for the impact of

overheads. This approach reflects that:

− CDI is predominantly involved in land development and section sales which can generate

significant lumpy and inconsistent cash flows depending on development and section sale

timing. The notion of “maintainable earnings” is therefore not applicable;

− The current market valuations for the residential land are largely based on directly comparable

sales evidence in the locations in which CDI operates, or the expected cash flows (both

development outflows and sales inflows and tax) from the property developments. We therefore

suggest that the valuations provide a reasonable estimate for the market value for CDI’s

development properties; and

− Similarly, the values independently assessed for the investment properties directly reflect the

estimated market value for these assets.


Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 32

Valuation of MCK

The aggregated market valuations for the CDI assets make no allowance for the costs of managing and

administering the portfolio. We estimate these costs at $6.0m for FY25 (based on FY24 overheads and

allowing for significant increases in council rates and increased development/sales activity). The total

cost has been valued using a multiple of 9.0x, with the chosen multiple reflecting our assessment of the

expected timeframe for completing the existing portfolio of developments.

Our valuation assessment for CDI is summarised in Table 16. We note:

− In order to capture the potential uncertainty and risk in the valuations for the underlying assets,

we have applied a notional value range of +/- 5%;

− We have included CDI’s net cash position as of 31 December 2024 of $33.2m; and

− The value of CDI attributed to MCK is pro-rated in line with MCK’s shareholding in CDI

(65.31%).

We estimate that the value of CDI attributable to MCK ranges between $248.6m and $276.2m, with a

mid-point of $262.4m.

Table 16: CDI Value Attributable to MCK

Sources: MCK FY24 financial results; CDI FY24 financial results; Northington Partners assessment.

We note that our mid-point CDI valuation of $1.38 per share compares to a current traded price for CDI

shares of $0.79 (as of 20 February 2025), representing a premium of 75%. However, for the same

reasons we discuss in Section 3.6 in relation to the traded value for MCK shares, we do not believe that

the traded value of CDI shares is a reliable measure of underlying value of the business (on a 100%

control basis). We suggest that the traded price for CDI shares simply reflects the very low level of

liquidity and a discount for a minority position.

4.4.4. Going Concern Value Summary

Based on the component values for MCK and CDI, our Going Concern Value for MCK Group is in a

range between $4.36 and $4.89 per share, with a mid-point of $4.62. Our valuation assessment is

summarised in Table 17.

Table 17: Going Concern Value Summary


6

EV of NZ Hotels less non-controlling interests in Copthorne Bay of Islands and Copthorne Queenstown Lakeview (totalling $22.4m based on the market

valuations for the subject properties).

Low ( $m) High ($m)

Mid-Point

($m)

Residential Land Development $339.9 $375.6 $357.8

Investment Property $61.8 $68.3 $65.1

CDI Overheads ($54.3) ($54.3) ($54.3)

Total CDI Enterprise Value $347.4 $389.7 $368.6

Plus Net Cash $33.2 $33.2 $33.2

Total CDI Equity Value $380.7 $422.9 $401.8

CDI Value per Share ($) $1.30 $1.45 $1.38

Less 34.69% Minority Interests ($132.0) ($146.7) ($139.4)

MCK Share of CDI Equity Value (65.31%) $248.6 $276.2 $262.4

MCK Group Going Concern Value ($m) Low High Mid

NZ Hotels (net of hotel NCI)

6

$328.5 $378.6 $353.6

Sofitel Brisbane JV $110.3 $110.3 $110.3

Hotel Surplus Land (-5% / +5%) $32.8 $36.2 $34.5

Sydney Apartments (-5% / +5%) $21.7 $24.0 $22.9

65.3% of CDI $248.6 $276.2 $262.4

Total MCK EV (Ex. CDI Minorities) $741.9 $825.4 $783.7


Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 31

Valuation of MCK

modestly lower than the average for these transactions to account for the varying quality of hotels

contained in the NZ Hotels portfolio.

Applying this multiple range to MCK’s FY25 budget EBITDA for the NZ Hotels segment of $32.7m (prior

to any allowance for corporate overheads) results in a value range of $458.1m - $523.5m. While this

value range is consistent with the current market valuations for the same hotel properties ($509.8m

excluding Sofitel Brisbane JV), it excludes the ongoing management overhead of administering and

managing the hotel portfolio. A total of ~$7.7m of corporate overheads has been allocated to NZ Hotels

within the MCK Group.

Our assessed value for the NZ Hotels portfolio is summarised in Table 15 below. After allowing for

overhead costs, our estimate of the Going Concern Value for NZ Hotels is in a range between $350.9m

and $401.1m.

Table 15: Going Concern Value for NZ Hotels


Low ($m) High ($m)

NZ Hotels FY25 EBITDA (pre Overheads) $32.7 $32.7

Allowance for NZ Hotels Corporate Overheads ($7.7) ($7.7)

NZ Hotels net EBITDA $25.1 $25.1

EBITDA Multiple 14.0x 16.0x

Enterprise Value $350.9 $401.1

4.4.2. Sofitel Brisbane JV, Surplus Land & Sydney Apartments

The adopted Going Concern Value for MCK Group’s NZ Hotels excludes certain MCK assets that do

not contribute to EBITDA, including:

− MCK’s 50% investment in Sofitel Brisbane. This is treated as an equity investment for

accounting purposes and its earnings contribution is not included in the FY25 budget EBITDA.

However, given this investment was acquired relatively recently (December 2023) and our

understanding that performance is meeting expectations, we suggest the value of MCK’s 50%

investment at the time of acquisition provides a suitable proxy for its current market value.

Based on the carrying value (including the purchase value and accumulated profits), we have

valued MCK’s 50% investment at $110.3m as of 31 December 2024.

− MCK’s surplus land at Queenstown, Te Anau, Palmerston North, Rotorua and Whangarei.

These land parcels provide scope for future hotel developments or could be sold as surplus

assets. We have added the 31 December 2024 market valuation of $34.5m for the surplus land

to our Going Concern Value with an allowance for +/-5% to account for uncertainty and risk

inherent in the valuation.

In addition, we have added the value of the 22 Sydney apartments owned by MCK. As these units are

expected to be sold within one year, we have adopted management’s est imate of the net realisable

value of $22.9m (with a +/-5% value range allowance).

4.4.3. CDI

As outlined in Section 4.1, we have valued CDI using the current market valuations for the residential

development and investment properties (detailed in Section 3.8.2) less an allowance for the impact of

overheads. This approach reflects that:

− CDI is predominantly involved in land development and section sales which can generate

significant lumpy and inconsistent cash flows depending on development and section sale

timing. The notion of “maintainable earnings” is therefore not applicable;

− The current market valuations for the residential land are largely based on directly comparable

sales evidence in the locations in which CDI operates, or the expected cash flows (both

development outflows and sales inflows and tax) from the property developments. We therefore

suggest that the valuations provide a reasonable estimate for the market value for CDI’s

development properties; and

− Similarly, the values independently assessed for the investment properties directly reflect the

estimated market value for these assets.


Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 32

Valuation of MCK

The aggregated market valuations for the CDI assets make no allowance for the costs of managing and

administering the portfolio. We estimate these costs at $6.0m for FY25 (based on FY24 overheads and

allowing for significant increases in council rates and increased development/sales activity). The total

cost has been valued using a multiple of 9.0x, with the chosen multiple reflecting our assessment of the

expected timeframe for completing the existing portfolio of developments.

Our valuation assessment for CDI is summarised in Table 16. We note:

− In order to capture the potential uncertainty and risk in the valuations for the underlying assets,

we have applied a notional value range of +/- 5%;

− We have included CDI’s net cash position as of 31 December 2024 of $33.2m; and

− The value of CDI attributed to MCK is pro-rated in line with MCK’s shareholding in CDI

(65.31%).

We estimate that the value of CDI attributable to MCK ranges between $248.6m and $276.2m, with a

mid-point of $262.4m.

Table 16: CDI Value Attributable to MCK

Sources: MCK FY24 financial results; CDI FY24 financial results; Northington Partners assessment.

We note that our mid-point CDI valuation of $1.38 per share compares to a current traded price for CDI

shares of $0.79 (as of 20 February 2025), representing a premium of 75%. However, for the same

reasons we discuss in Section 3.6 in relation to the traded value for MCK shares, we do not believe that

the traded value of CDI shares is a reliable measure of underlying value of the business (on a 100%

control basis). We suggest that the traded price for CDI shares simply reflects the very low level of

liquidity and a discount for a minority position.

4.4.4. Going Concern Value Summary

Based on the component values for MCK and CDI, our Going Concern Value for MCK Group is in a

range between $4.36 and $4.89 per share, with a mid-point of $4.62. Our valuation assessment is

summarised in Table 17.

Table 17: Going Concern Value Summary


6

EV of NZ Hotels less non-controlling interests in Copthorne Bay of Islands and Copthorne Queenstown Lakeview (totalling $22.4m based on the market

valuations for the subject properties).

Low ( $m) High ($m)

Mid-Point

($m)

Residential Land Development $339.9 $375.6 $357.8

Investment Property $61.8 $68.3 $65.1

CDI Overheads ($54.3) ($54.3) ($54.3)

Total CDI Enterprise Value $347.4 $389.7 $368.6

Plus Net Cash $33.2 $33.2 $33.2

Total CDI Equity Value $380.7 $422.9 $401.8

CDI Value per Share ($) $1.30 $1.45 $1.38

Less 34.69% Minority Interests ($132.0) ($146.7) ($139.4)

MCK Share of CDI Equity Value (65.31%) $248.6 $276.2 $262.4

MCK Group Going Concern Value ($m) Low High Mid

NZ Hotels (net of hotel NCI)

6

$328.5 $378.6 $353.6

Sofitel Brisbane JV $110.3 $110.3 $110.3

Hotel Surplus Land (-5% / +5%) $32.8 $36.2 $34.5

Sydney Apartments (-5% / +5%) $21.7 $24.0 $22.9

65.3% of CDI $248.6 $276.2 $262.4

Total MCK EV (Ex. CDI Minorities) $741.9 $825.4 $783.7

APPENDIX: INDEPENDENT ADVISER’S REPORT


Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 33

Valuation of MCK

Source: Northington Partners.

4.5. Wind-up Value

While MCK’s strategy is to operate its hotels, develop its residential land holdings and continue to hold

its investment properties, we believe that the assets could be readily sold on a hypothetical wind-up

scenario. We have therefore also assessed the potential Wind-up Value of MCK on the basis of an

orderly sale of its component assets.

We note that liquidation would require a special resolution of shareholders and CDL therefore controls

any decision to liquidate MCK via its majority shareholding (and CDI through MCK’s majority ownership

interest in that business). While we understand CDL has no intention of changing its current strategy,

we suggest that the Wind-up Value provides a useful counterfactual valuation benchmark to our Going

Concern Value.

Table 18 below summarises the key assumptions used in evaluating the Wind-up Value.

Table 18: Wind-up Value Assumptions

Category Assumptions

Liquidation period - Given the size and unique nature of MCK’s asset portfolio, we consider it unlikely

that the assets could be readily sold to one purchaser and would need to be sold in

multiple parcels. Even the hotel portfolio would likely necessitate a break-up to

reflect the differing quality and locations of the portfolio.

- Given the number and diversity of the assets owned by MCK, we assume that an

orderly realisation of assets would take 2 – 3 years to complete before the final

proceeds could be distributed to shareholders. This timeframe also reflects the

time required to appoint a liquidator and finalise the liquidation process in line with

New Zealand legal requirements.

NZ Hotels, Sofitel

Brisbane JV and

Surplus Land

- The hotel portfolio contains properties with varying quality and locations and we

believe that some of the hotel assets are likely to attract more buyer interest than

others (e.g. MSocial Auckland vs Copthorne Greymouth). We have therefore

assumed that the portfolio is sold down in tranches. Rather than determining the

order of potential sales on an asset-by-asset basis, we have simply assumed the

portfolio is realised as follows: 40% after 1 year, 30% at the end of year 2 and 30%

at the end of year 3.

- The uncertainty over the sell-down timing is partly accounted for in our assumed

sale values. The mid-point values are based on the 31 December 2024 valuations

but with an allowance for 5% value upside and 5% downside.

- All asset sales are assumed to incur total disposal costs of 2%.

Sydney

Apartments

- We have assumed the sales of the remaining Sydney apartments, commercial

units and carparks are completed within one year, consistent with management’s

es ti mates.

Lease liabilities

and deferred tax

liability

- The majority of the on-going lease liabilities for MCK is related to ground leases

that are in place for a small number of hotels. As the property valuers have either

considered the ground lease payments in the forecast cash flows or excluded their

associated revenue (e.g. carparking revenue in M Social Auckland) when

assessing current market value, we have not made an explicit allowance for the

lease liability in the Wind-up Value scenario.

- We have however assumed that the deferred tax liability arising from depreciation

recovery would crystallize under a wind-up scenario and have made an allowance

for that cost in our estimate of the net liquidation proceeds.


7

Adjusted Net Debt includes lease liabilities mainly related to ground rent (in Copthorne Auckland and Copthorne Greymouth hotels) and carpark leases

(in M Social Auckland and Millennium Rotorua) because these costs are not included in the IFRS16 reported EBITDA. It also includes the incremental new

debt facilities ($30m) utilised to purchase the Christchurch Mayfair hotel post 31 December 2024.

Less Adjusted Net Debt

7

($52.4) ($52.4) ($52.4)

MCK Total Equity Value $689.6 $773.1 $731.3

Fully Diluted Shares on Issue

158,218,286 158,218,286 158,218,286

Value per share ($) $4.36 $4.89 $4.62


Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 34

Valuation of MCK

CDI - CDI is assumed to be wound up and liquidated at the same time as MCK with

minority shareholders receiving their proceeds at the end of the realisation period.

- We have assumed CDI’s investment property portfolio is sold at the end of the

liquidation period (2 or 3 years) reflecting our view that these assets are relatively

liquid and will generate stable income over the realisation period. They are

assumed to generate sufficient returns over the liquidation period such that the

eventual sale value will deliver an amount equal to the 31 December 2024 market

value in present value terms. That is, we assume these assets will generate

income and capital appreciation in line with their cost of capital).

- Given the nature of CDI’s residential development activities and the need to

continue development in order to support asset values, we assume that CDI

continues to actively develop and market sections over the realisation period.

Similar to the investment property portfolio, we assume that the cash flows from

ongoing development and section sales generates sufficient returns to justify the

current market valuation of these properties (as of 31 December 2024) in present

value terms.

- To account for the sell-down uncertainty, we have assumed the sale values (in

present value terms) range between 5% below and 5% above their 31 December

2024 market valuations.

Interim Capital

Return

- In order to maximise value from the sell-down, we assume that an interim capital

return is made at the end of year 1 of approximately $130m.

- We have assumed this is achieved through a pro rata share buyback. Given

MCK’s available subscribed capital (and available imputation credits), we assume

that the capital return is non-taxable to shareholders.

Wind-up Costs - We estimate redundancy costs of $7.1 million (based on corporate overhead

salary costs for 6 months) plus $1.0 million for other liquidation related costs (legal,

tax and other wind-up costs).

Net operating cash

flow during

realisation period

- We have assumed that the business would generate annual net cash flows

consistent with MCK’s FY25 budget for the remainder of FY25. We have forecast

FY26 and FY27 operational cash flows consistent with FY25 but reflecting

expected ongoing increases in occupancy rates (to pre-Covid levels by FY27) and

a 3% annual increase in the overall ADR.

- Rental income from CDI’s investment property portfolio and corporate overhead

costs are assumed to be in line with the FY25 budget, with a 3% annual increase

assumed for the remainder the wind-up period.

- Annual capex assumed for FY25-FY27 ($15.9m in FY25, $7.8m in FY26 and

$3.9m in FY27) based on MCK’s capex budget. We have not considered any

additional capex required for other major projects during the wind-up period as the

majority of this capex has been factored in the property market valuations.

- For simplicity, the net cash flows resulting from the on-going business is estimated

to reduce proportionally in line with assumed asset realisations.

- We have allowed for interest income (at 4 %) on the cash proceeds generated from

the orderly realisation of assets.

Present value

calculation

- We estimate the present value of the realisation proceeds from the 2-3 year sell-

down period by discounting the projected cashflows at a nominal, post-tax discount

rate of 10%.

- This rate represents our assessment of the appropriate risk-adjusted return for

MCK’s portfolio which comprises assets with a variety of risk profiles (i .e. higher

risk residential property development vs relatively lower risk investment properties

and hotels).

Source: Northington Partners.

The values of each component of the Wind-up Value are summarised in Table 19 below. In present

value terms, we estimate a total value range between $704.8m and $814.1m. Assuming that the RPS

are not redeemed and will therefore participate in the net proceeds on the same basis as the ordinary

shares (see Section 4.2 above), our valuation equates to $4.45 and $5.15 per share, with a mid-point of

$4.80.


Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 33

Valuation of MCK

Source: Northington Partners.

4.5. Wind-up Value

While MCK’s strategy is to operate its hotels, develop its residential land holdings and continue to hold

its investment properties, we believe that the assets could be readily sold on a hypothetical wind-up

scenario. We have therefore also assessed the potential Wind-up Value of MCK on the basis of an

orderly sale of its component assets.

We note that liquidation would require a special resolution of shareholders and CDL therefore controls

any decision to liquidate MCK via its majority shareholding (and CDI through MCK’s majority ownership

interest in that business). While we understand CDL has no intention of changing its current strategy,

we suggest that the Wind-up Value provides a useful counterfactual valuation benchmark to our Going

Concern Value.

Table 18 below summarises the key assumptions used in evaluating the Wind-up Value.

Table 18: Wind-up Value Assumptions

Category Assumptions

Liquidation period - Given the size and unique nature of MCK’s asset portfolio, we consider it unlikely

that the assets could be readily sold to one purchaser and would need to be sold in

multiple parcels. Even the hotel portfolio would likely necessitate a break-up to

reflect the differing quality and locations of the portfolio.

- Given the number and diversity of the assets owned by MCK, we assume that an

orderly realisation of assets would take 2 – 3 years to complete before the final

proceeds could be distributed to shareholders. This timeframe also reflects the

time required to appoint a liquidator and finalise the liquidation process in line with

New Zealand legal requirements.

NZ Hotels, Sofitel

Brisbane JV and

Surplus Land

- The hotel portfolio contains properties with varying quality and locations and we

believe that some of the hotel assets are likely to attract more buyer interest than

others (e.g. MSocial Auckland vs Copthorne Greymouth). We have therefore

assumed that the portfolio is sold down in tranches. Rather than determining the

order of potential sales on an asset-by-asset basis, we have simply assumed the

portfolio is realised as follows: 40% after 1 year, 30% at the end of year 2 and 30%

at the end of year 3.

- The uncertainty over the sell-down timing is partly accounted for in our assumed

sale values. The mid-point values are based on the 31 December 2024 valuations

but with an allowance for 5% value upside and 5% downside.

- All asset sales are assumed to incur total disposal costs of 2%.

Sydney

Apartments

- We have assumed the sales of the remaining Sydney apartments, commercial

units and carparks are completed within one year, consistent with management’s

es ti mates.

Lease liabilities

and deferred tax

liability

- The majority of the on-going lease liabilities for MCK is related to ground leases

that are in place for a small number of hotels. As the property valuers have either

considered the ground lease payments in the forecast cash flows or excluded their

associated revenue (e.g. carparking revenue in M Social Auckland) when

assessing current market value, we have not made an explicit allowance for the

lease liability in the Wind-up Value scenario.

- We have however assumed that the deferred tax liability arising from depreciation

recovery would crystallize under a wind-up scenario and have made an allowance

for that cost in our estimate of the net liquidation proceeds.


7

Adjusted Net Debt includes lease liabilities mainly related to ground rent (in Copthorne Auckland and Copthorne Greymouth hotels) and carpark leases

(in M Social Auckland and Millennium Rotorua) because these costs are not included in the IFRS16 reported EBITDA. It also includes the incremental new

debt facilities ($30m) utilised to purchase the Christchurch Mayfair hotel post 31 December 2024.

Less Adjusted Net Debt

7

($52.4) ($52.4) ($52.4)

MCK Total Equity Value $689.6 $773.1 $731.3

Fully Diluted Shares on Issue

158,218,286 158,218,286 158,218,286

Value per share ($) $4.36 $4.89 $4.62


Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 34

Valuation of MCK

CDI - CDI is assumed to be wound up and liquidated at the same time as MCK with

minority shareholders receiving their proceeds at the end of the realisation period.

- We have assumed CDI’s investment property portfolio is sold at the end of the

liquidation period (2 or 3 years) reflecting our view that these assets are relatively

liquid and will generate stable income over the realisation period. They are

assumed to generate sufficient returns over the liquidation period such that the

eventual sale value will deliver an amount equal to the 31 December 2024 market

value in present value terms. That is, we assume these assets will generate

income and capital appreciation in line with their cost of capital).

- Given the nature of CDI’s residential development activities and the need to

continue development in order to support asset values, we assume that CDI

continues to actively develop and market sections over the realisation period.

Similar to the investment property portfolio, we assume that the cash flows from

ongoing development and section sales generates sufficient returns to justify the

current market valuation of these properties (as of 31 December 2024) in present

value terms.

- To account for the sell-down uncertainty, we have assumed the sale values (in

present value terms) range between 5% below and 5% above their 31 December

2024 market valuations.

Interim Capital

Return

- In order to maximise value from the sell-down, we assume that an interim capital

return is made at the end of year 1 of approximately $130m.

- We have assumed this is achieved through a pro rata share buyback. Given

MCK’s available subscribed capital (and available imputation credits), we assume

that the capital return is non-taxable to shareholders.

Wind-up Costs - We estimate redundancy costs of $7.1 million (based on corporate overhead

salary costs for 6 months) plus $1.0 million for other liquidation related costs (legal,

tax and other wind-up costs).

Net operating cash

flow during

realisation period

- We have assumed that the business would generate annual net cash flows

consistent with MCK’s FY25 budget for the remainder of FY25. We have forecast

FY26 and FY27 operational cash flows consistent with FY25 but reflecting

expected ongoing increases in occupancy rates (to pre-Covid levels by FY27) and

a 3% annual increase in the overall ADR.

- Rental income from CDI’s investment property portfolio and corporate overhead

costs are assumed to be in line with the FY25 budget, with a 3% annual increase

assumed for the remainder the wind-up period.

- Annual capex assumed for FY25-FY27 ($15.9m in FY25, $7.8m in FY26 and

$3.9m in FY27) based on MCK’s capex budget. We have not considered any

additional capex required for other major projects during the wind-up period as the

majority of this capex has been factored in the property market valuations.

- For simplicity, the net cash flows resulting from the on-going business is estimated

to reduce proportionally in line with assumed asset realisations.

- We have allowed for interest income (at 4 %) on the cash proceeds generated from

the orderly realisation of assets.

Present value

calculation

- We estimate the present value of the realisation proceeds from the 2-3 year sell-

down period by discounting the projected cashflows at a nominal, post-tax discount

rate of 10%.

- This rate represents our assessment of the appropriate risk-adjusted return for

MCK’s portfolio which comprises assets with a variety of risk profiles (i .e. higher

risk residential property development vs relatively lower risk investment properties

and hotels).

Source: Northington Partners.

The values of each component of the Wind-up Value are summarised in Table 19 below. In present

value terms, we estimate a total value range between $704.8m and $814.1m. Assuming that the RPS

are not redeemed and will therefore participate in the net proceeds on the same basis as the ordinary

shares (see Section 4.2 above), our valuation equates to $4.45 and $5.15 per share, with a mid-point of

$4.80.

APPENDIX: INDEPENDENT ADVISER’S REPORT


Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 35

Valuation of MCK

Table 19: Wind-up Value Summary

Source: Northington Partners analysis.

4.6. Valuation Conclusion

Based on our Going Concern Value and Wind-up Value ranges, we have determined a value range for

MCK of between $696.2 million and $791.1 million, with a mid-point value of $743.6 million. As

summarised in Figure 19, this represents a value per share of $4.40 to $5.00 (with a mid-point of

$4.70).

Figure 19: Assessed MCK Value Range ($ per MCK Share)



Source: Northington Partners analysis.


Our value range for MCK of $4.40 - $5.00 per share compares to MCK’s reported book value per share

of $3.46 as of 31 December 2024. The book value reflects the carrying value for MCK’s assets, which

are recorded at cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment losses. If MCK’s properties are

reported at market value (as was the Company’s accounting policy prior to FY21), our assessment of

the adjusted NAV per share is $5.71 as at 31 December 2024 (prior to tax considerations).

Predominantly allowing for the implied deferred tax on the market revaluations (and to a lesser extent,

capital gains tax on the Sydney Apartments value), MCK’s own assessed market value implied NAV is

$5.39

9

.

Our value range therefore represents a discount to our market value adjusted NAV per share of 13% -

23% (or a 7% - 18% discount to MCK’s reported adjusted NAV of $5.39). This discount largely reflects

Company overheads which are incorporated into our valuation framework but not incorporated into the

property market valuations.



8

Our NPV estimate assumes that a first capital return, equivalent to $130m, would be achieved through a pro rata share buyback in February 2026, with

the remaining realisation proceeds (including accumulated net income) distributed to shareholders at the end of the liquidation period (2 to 3 years).

9

We have excluded the deferred tax impact from our assessed NAV as it represents an accounting value that is highly unlikely to ever become payable.

$4.40

$4.45

$4.36

$5.00

$5.15

$4.89

$3.00$3.50$4.00$4.50$5.00$5.50$6.00

Assessed range

Wind-Up Value

Going Concern Value

$ per MCK share

MCK Wind-Up Value

Low ($m)

(3 years/

-5%)

High ($m)

(2 years/

+5%)

Mid-Point

($m)

MCK net proceeds (ex. CDI) over realisation period

$586.4 $642.5 $614.5

CDI net proceeds over realisation period (MCK 65% share)

$292.0 $312.5 $302.3

Net operating cash flow during realisation period

$36.7 $18.7 $27.7

Redundancy and liquidation/wind-up costs

($8.1) ($8.1) ($8.1)

Net Realisable Value

$907.1 $965.6 $936.3



Net Present Value (2-3 years)

8

$704.8 $814.1 $759.5

Assessed Wind-Up Value per share

$4.45 $5.15 $4.80

NAV at market as

of 31 Dec 2024

$5.71

Reported NAV as

of 31 Dec 2024

$3.46


Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 36

Assessment of the Merits of the Offer

5.0 Assessment of the Merits of the Offer

5.1. Comparison of the Offer Price to our Assessed Value of MCK

As set out in Section 4.6, we have assessed the full underlying value of MCK shares in a range

between $4.40 and $5.00 per share, with a mid-point of $4.70 per share.

The full underlying value is the price a person or entity would be expected to pay to acquire the

company as a whole and accordingly includes a premium for control. Although CDL already has

effective control of the Company via its 75.9% shareholding, we believe that the 100% control value of

MCK is the appropriate valuation benchmark for full takeover offers. This represents our estimate of the

value that CDL will acquire for each share if the Offer is successful.

Figure 20 below compares the Offer Price with our assessment of the full underlying value of MCK’s

shares. Given that our mid-point value of $4.70 per share is more than double the Offer Price of $2.25,

we conclude that the Offer significantly undervalues the Company.

Figure 20: Comparison of Offer Price to Assessed Value Range ($ per MCK Share)


(1) NZX traded price represents the volume weighted average ordinary share price during the 20 days prior to the Offer

announcement.


Sources: Northington Partners; NZX; Offer.

Although the Offer Price represents a premium of 29.0% to the 20-day VWAP of MCK’s shares ($1.75)

prior to CDL’s announcement of its intention to make an offer (20 January 2025), we suggest that

MCK’s share price is of limited relevance in this instance. The observed NZX prices relate to trades for

small parcels of shares and reflect that MCK shares are very ill iquid. We suggest the low price (relative

to our assessed value) may also reflect that CDL has control of MCK and is pursuing a strategy which

favours long-term capital appreciation over cash distributions in the short term.

5.2. Consequences for Minority Shareholders if the Offer is not Successful

5.2.1. 90% Minimum Acceptance Condition Not Waived

If the Offer conditions are not fully satisfied or waived by CDL, the Offer will lapse and accepting

shareholders will not receive the Offer Price for their shares. MCK will continue to operate in its current

form and CDL will have a number of options to consider:

- It could simply retain its current shareholding in MCK and continue to operate the Company in

line with the current strategy. Under this scenario, we expect that the price for MCK shares will

continue to trade at a significant discount to our assessed value range because of the lack of

liquidity for MCK shares and ongoing minority discount attributed to small share parcels.

- CDL could increase its shareholding in MCK through the “creep” provisions of the Code. Under

the creep provisions, CDL can acquire up to 5.0% of MCK per 12-month period without having

to make an offer for the Company. However, we note that CDL has already recently utilised

$4.40

$5.00

$4.70

$1.75

$2.25

$-

$1.00

$2.00

$3.00

$4.00

$5.00

$6.00

$7.00

Low

HighMidTraded Price

(NZX)

Offer Price

(1)


Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 35

Valuation of MCK

Table 19: Wind-up Value Summary

Source: Northington Partners analysis.

4.6. Valuation Conclusion

Based on our Going Concern Value and Wind-up Value ranges, we have determined a value range for

MCK of between $696.2 million and $791.1 million, with a mid-point value of $743.6 million. As

summarised in Figure 19, this represents a value per share of $4.40 to $5.00 (with a mid-point of

$4.70).

Figure 19: Assessed MCK Value Range ($ per MCK Share)



Source: Northington Partners analysis.


Our value range for MCK of $4.40 - $5.00 per share compares to MCK’s reported book value per share

of $3.46 as of 31 December 2024. The book value reflects the carrying value for MCK’s assets, which

are recorded at cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment losses. If MCK’s properties are

reported at market value (as was the Company’s accounting policy prior to FY21), our assessment of

the adjusted NAV per share is $5.71 as at 31 December 2024 (prior to tax considerations).

Predominantly allowing for the implied deferred tax on the market revaluations (and to a lesser extent,

capital gains tax on the Sydney Apartments value), MCK’s own assessed market value implied NAV is

$5.39

9

.

Our value range therefore represents a discount to our market value adjusted NAV per share of 13% -

23% (or a 7% - 18% discount to MCK’s reported adjusted NAV of $5.39). This discount largely reflects

Company overheads which are incorporated into our valuation framework but not incorporated into the

property market valuations.



8

Our NPV estimate assumes that a first capital return, equivalent to $130m, would be achieved through a pro rata share buyback in February 2026, with

the remaining realisation proceeds (including accumulated net income) distributed to shareholders at the end of the liquidation period (2 to 3 years).

9

We have excluded the deferred tax impact from our assessed NAV as it represents an accounting value that is highly unlikely to ever become payable.

$4.40

$4.45

$4.36

$5.00

$5.15

$4.89

$3.00$3.50$4.00$4.50$5.00$5.50$6.00

Assessed range

Wind-Up Value

Going Concern Value

$ per MCK share

MCK Wind-Up Value

Low ($m)

(3 years/

-5%)

High ($m)

(2 years/

+5%)

Mid-Point

($m)

MCK net proceeds (ex. CDI) over realisation period

$586.4 $642.5 $614.5

CDI net proceeds over realisation period (MCK 65% share)

$292.0 $312.5 $302.3

Net operating cash flow during realisation period

$36.7 $18.7 $27.7

Redundancy and liquidation/wind-up costs

($8.1) ($8.1) ($8.1)

Net Realisable Value

$907.1 $965.6 $936.3



Net Present Value (2-3 years)

8

$704.8 $814.1 $759.5

Assessed Wind-Up Value per share

$4.45 $5.15 $4.80

NAV at market as

of 31 Dec 2024

$5.71

Reported NAV as

of 31 Dec 2024

$3.46


Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 36

Assessment of the Merits of the Offer

5.0 Assessment of the Merits of the Offer

5.1. Comparison of the Offer Price to our Assessed Value of MCK

As set out in Section 4.6, we have assessed the full underlying value of MCK shares in a range

between $4.40 and $5.00 per share, with a mid-point of $4.70 per share.

The full underlying value is the price a person or entity would be expected to pay to acquire the

company as a whole and accordingly includes a premium for control. Although CDL already has

effective control of the Company via its 75.9% shareholding, we believe that the 100% control value of

MCK is the appropriate valuation benchmark for full takeover offers. This represents our estimate of the

value that CDL will acquire for each share if the Offer is successful.

Figure 20 below compares the Offer Price with our assessment of the full underlying value of MCK’s

shares. Given that our mid-point value of $4.70 per share is more than double the Offer Price of $2.25,

we conclude that the Offer significantly undervalues the Company.

Figure 20: Comparison of Offer Price to Assessed Value Range ($ per MCK Share)


(1) NZX traded price represents the volume weighted average ordinary share price during the 20 days prior to the Offer

announcement.


Sources: Northington Partners; NZX; Offer.

Although the Offer Price represents a premium of 29.0% to the 20-day VWAP of MCK’s shares ($1.75)

prior to CDL’s announcement of its intention to make an offer (20 January 2025), we suggest that

MCK’s share price is of limited relevance in this instance. The observed NZX prices relate to trades for

small parcels of shares and reflect that MCK shares are very ill iquid. We suggest the low price (relative

to our assessed value) may also reflect that CDL has control of MCK and is pursuing a strategy which

favours long-term capital appreciation over cash distributions in the short term.

5.2. Consequences for Minority Shareholders if the Offer is not Successful

5.2.1. 90% Minimum Acceptance Condition Not Waived

If the Offer conditions are not fully satisfied or waived by CDL, the Offer will lapse and accepting

shareholders will not receive the Offer Price for their shares. MCK will continue to operate in its current

form and CDL will have a number of options to consider:

- It could simply retain its current shareholding in MCK and continue to operate the Company in

line with the current strategy. Under this scenario, we expect that the price for MCK shares will

continue to trade at a significant discount to our assessed value range because of the lack of

liquidity for MCK shares and ongoing minority discount attributed to small share parcels.

- CDL could increase its shareholding in MCK through the “creep” provisions of the Code. Under

the creep provisions, CDL can acquire up to 5.0% of MCK per 12-month period without having

to make an offer for the Company. However, we note that CDL has already recently utilised

$4.40

$5.00

$4.70

$1.75

$2.25

$-

$1.00

$2.00

$3.00

$4.00

$5.00

$6.00

$7.00

LowHighMidTraded Price

(NZX)

Offer Price

(1)

APPENDIX: INDEPENDENT ADVISER’S REPORT


Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 37

Assessment of the Merits of the Offer

the creep provisions acquiring 5.0% of MCK through the on-market purchase of 5.3m shares

on 29 October 2024 (increasing its voting control from 70.9% to 75.9%). Therefore, CDL could

not increase its shareholding through the creep provisions until after 29 October 2025.

- CDL could attempt another full takeover at some point in the future. Presumably the new offer

would be made at a higher price to improve the likelihood of receiving acceptances which

would take CDL’s shareholding above the 90% threshold.

We note there is no certainty that CDL will launch a new takeover offer. If that doesn’t eventuate, the

low level of liquidity means that minority shareholders may have limited ability to exit their investment in

MCK for the foreseeable future.

5.2.2. 90% Minimum Acceptance Condition Waived

CDL is entitled to waive the 90% acceptance condition and increase its shareholding to the extent of

any acceptances received. This would result in CDL owning between 76% - 89.9% of the shares on

issue in MCK when the Offer closes. Although under this scenario the future options available to CDL

as outlined above would still apply, we note that:

- Market liquidity for the shares is likely to be further reduced given the lower number of free-

float shares available for trading.

- CDL could not utilise the creep provisions of the Code until 12 months after the Offer has

closed. If the shares acquired under these provisions resulted in CDL holding more than 90%

of the shares on issue, any shares subsequently acquired under the compulsory acquisition

provisions of the Code would need to be at a price per share that was certified as fair and

reasonable by an independent expert.

- Any new offer (and potentially a higher offer price) would only apply to the outstanding shares

at that time. In certain circumstances if CDL reaches the 90% acceptance level to compulsorily

acquire the remaining shares, shareholders may have objection rights in relation to the price

offered for their shares (whereby the price paid to objecting shareholders will be the fair and

reasonable price certified by an independent expert).

5.2.3. Likelihood of Alternative Offers

In our view, the likelihood of an alternative takeover offer emerging for MCK is extremely low. As the

Offeror already controls 75.9% of the voting rights in the Company, any alternative takeover offer would

require the support of the Offeror. For the Offeror to sell into an alternative offer would constitute a

significant about-turn, given it has clearly signalled through the Offer that it intends to exercise its rights

as the dominant owner to compulsorily acquire any shares which are not acquired under the Offer.

Therefore, the likelihood of shareholders receiving better value for their shares than under the current

Offer is dependent on CDL’s propensity to increase the Offer Price under the current Offer (which it is

entitled to do under the Code) or to make a new offer at some point in the future.

5.3. Outcomes if the Offer is Successful

If the Offer receives acceptances which will increase CDL’s shareholding over 90%, the Offeror will

become the dominant owner under Rule 50 of the Code and CDL has stated that it intends to

compulsorily acquire any shares which are not acquired under the Offer. In this situation, all

shareholders will receive the Offer Price for their shares ($2.25) irrespective of whether they accepted

the Offer or not.

5.4. Ability to Exit at Known Price

While the Offer Price of $2.25 per MCK share is considerably lower than our assessed value range of

$4.40 to $5.00 per share, some shareholders may see the Offer as an opportunity to exit their

investment in MCK at a known price (without brokerage costs). As discussed above, MCK shares are

highly illiquid and will remain so if the Offer is unsuccessful. Given the uncertainties relating to the share

price and market liquidity after the Offer has closed, some shareholders may accept a price lower than

the perceived value of the shares in return for a certain exit.



Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 38

Appendix 1

Appendix 1. Sources of Information Used in this Report

Other than the information sources referenced directly in the body of the report, this assessment is

reliant on the following sources of information:

- MCK’s annual reports and announcements.

- MCK’s property valuation reports desktop valuation updates from CVAS (NZ) Limited trading

as Colliers and Bower Valuations Limited.

- MCK’s FY24 financial results and FY25 budget.

- CDI’s FY24 financial results.

- MCK’s hotel operating statistics (historical and budget).

- MCK’s 5-year capex budget.

- Discussions with senior personnel of MCK.

- Various other documents that we considered necessary for the purposes of our analysis.


Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 37

Assessment of the Merits of the Offer

the creep provisions acquiring 5.0% of MCK through the on-market purchase of 5.3m shares

on 29 October 2024 (increasing its voting control from 70.9% to 75.9%). Therefore, CDL could

not increase its shareholding through the creep provisions until after 29 October 2025.

- CDL could attempt another full takeover at some point in the future. Presumably the new offer

would be made at a higher price to improve the likelihood of receiving acceptances which

would take CDL’s shareholding above the 90% threshold.

We note there is no certainty that CDL will launch a new takeover offer. If that doesn’t eventuate, the

low level of liquidity means that minority shareholders may have limited ability to exit their investment in

MCK for the foreseeable future.

5.2.2. 90% Minimum Acceptance Condition Waived

CDL is entitled to waive the 90% acceptance condition and increase its shareholding to the extent of

any acceptances received. This would result in CDL owning between 76% - 89.9% of the shares on

issue in MCK when the Offer closes. Although under this scenario the future options available to CDL

as outlined above would still apply, we note that:

- Market liquidity for the shares is likely to be further reduced given the lower number of free-

float shares available for trading.

- CDL could not utilise the creep provisions of the Code until 12 months after the Offer has

closed. If the shares acquired under these provisions resulted in CDL holding more than 90%

of the shares on issue, any shares subsequently acquired under the compulsory acquisition

provisions of the Code would need to be at a price per share that was certified as fair and

reasonable by an independent expert.

- Any new offer (and potentially a higher offer price) would only apply to the outstanding shares

at that time. In certain circumstances if CDL reaches the 90% acceptance level to compulsorily

acquire the remaining shares, shareholders may have objection rights in relation to the price

offered for their shares (whereby the price paid to objecting shareholders will be the fair and

reasonable price certified by an independent expert).

5.2.3. Likelihood of Alternative Offers

In our view, the likelihood of an alternative takeover offer emerging for MCK is extremely low. As the

Offeror already controls 75.9% of the voting rights in the Company, any alternative takeover offer would

require the support of the Offeror. For the Offeror to sell into an alternative offer would constitute a

significant about-turn, given it has clearly signalled through the Offer that it intends to exercise its rights

as the dominant owner to compulsorily acquire any shares which are not acquired under the Offer.

Therefore, the likelihood of shareholders receiving better value for their shares than under the current

Offer is dependent on CDL’s propensity to increase the Offer Price under the current Offer (which it is

entitled to do under the Code) or to make a new offer at some point in the future.

5.3. Outcomes if the Offer is Successful

If the Offer receives acceptances which will increase CDL’s shareholding over 90%, the Offeror will

become the dominant owner under Rule 50 of the Code and CDL has stated that it intends to

compulsorily acquire any shares which are not acquired under the Offer. In this situation, all

shareholders will receive the Offer Price for their shares ($2.25) irrespective of whether they accepted

the Offer or not.

5.4. Ability to Exit at Known Price

While the Offer Price of $2.25 per MCK share is considerably lower than our assessed value range of

$4.40 to $5.00 per share, some shareholders may see the Offer as an opportunity to exit their

investment in MCK at a known price (without brokerage costs). As discussed above, MCK shares are

highly illiquid and will remain so if the Offer is unsuccessful. Given the uncertainties relating to the share

price and market liquidity after the Offer has closed, some shareholders may accept a price lower than

the perceived value of the shares in return for a certain exit.



Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 38

Appendix 1

Appendix 1. Sources of Information Used in this Report

Other than the information sources referenced directly in the body of the report, this assessment is

reliant on the following sources of information:

- MCK’s annual reports and announcements.

- MCK’s property valuation reports desktop valuation updates from CVAS (NZ) Limited trading

as Colliers and Bower Valuations Limited.

- MCK’s FY24 financial results and FY25 budget.

- CDI’s FY24 financial results.

- MCK’s hotel operating statistics (historical and budget).

- MCK’s 5-year capex budget.

- Discussions with senior personnel of MCK.

- Various other documents that we considered necessary for the purposes of our analysis.


APPENDIX: INDEPENDENT ADVISER’S REPORT


Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 39

Appendix 2

Appendix 2. Declarations, Qualifications and Consents

Declarations

This report is dated 24 February 2025 and has been prepared by Northington Partners at the request of

the directors of MCK to fulfil the reporting requirements pursuant to Rule 21 of the Code. This report, or

any part of it, should not be reproduced or used for any other purpose. Northington Partners

specifically disclaims any obligation or liability to any party whatsoever in the event that this report is

supplied or applied for any purpose other than that for which it is intended.

Prior drafts of this report were provided to MCK for review and discussion. Although minor factual

changes to the report were made after the release of the first draft, there were no changes to our

methodology, analysis, or conclusions.

This report is provided for the benefit of all of the Non-associated Shareholders of MCK that are being

asked to consider the Offer, and Northington Partners consents to the distribution of this report to those

people.

Our engagement terms did not contain any term which materially restricted the scope of our work.

Qualifications

Northington Partners provides an independent corporate advisory service to companies operating

throughout New Zealand. The company specialises in mergers and acquisitions, capital raising

support, expert opinions, financial instrument valuations, and business and share valuations.

Northington Partners is retained by a mix of publicly listed companies, substantial privately held

companies, and state-owned enterprises.

The individuals responsible for preparing this report are Greg Anderson B.Com, M.Com (Hons), Ph.D,

Jonathan Burke B.Com (Hons), BCM, and Pedro Monteiro B.Com, MBA. Each individual has a wealth

of experience in providing independent advice to clients relating to the value of business assets and

equity instruments, as well as the choice of appropriate financial structures and governance issues.

Northington Partners has been responsible for the preparation of numerous independent reports in

relation to takeovers, mergers, and a range of other transactions subject to the Takeovers Code and

NZX Listing Rules.

Independence

Northington Partners has not been previously engaged by MCK or (to the best of our knowledge) by

any other party to the Offer in relation to any matter for the Offer that could affect our independence.

None of the Directors or employees of Northington Partners have any other relationship with any of the

directors or substantial security holders of the parties involved in the Offer.

The preparation of this independent report will be Northington Partners’ only involvement in relation to

the Offer. Northington Partners will be paid a fixed fee for its services which is in no way contingent on

the outcome of our analysis or the content of our report.

Northington Partners does not have any conflict of interest that could affect its ability to provide an

unbiased report.

Disclaimer and Restrictions on the Scope of Our Work

In preparing this report, Northington Partners has relied on information provided by MCK. Northington

Partners has not performed anything in the nature of an audit of that information, and does not express

any opinion on the reliability, accuracy, or completeness of the information provided to us and upon

which we have relied.

Northington Partners has used the provided information on the basis that it is true and accurate in

material respects and not misleading by reason of omission or otherwise. Accordingly, neither

Northington Partners nor its directors, employees or agents, accept any responsibility or liability for any

such information being inaccurate, incomplete, unreliable or not soundly based or for any errors in the

analysis, statements and opinions provided in this report resulting directly or indirectly from any such

circumstances or from any assumptions upon which this report is based proving unjustified.


Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 40

Appendix 2

We reserve the right, but will be under no obligation, to review or amend our report if any additional

information which was in existence on the date of this report was not brought to our attention, or

subsequently comes to light.

Indemnity

MCK has agreed to indemnify Northington Partners (to the maximum extent permitted by law) for all

claims, proceedings, damages, losses (including consequential losses), fines, penalties, costs, charges

and expenses (including legal fees and disbursements) suffered or incurred by Northington Partners in

relation to the preparation of this report, except to the extent resulting from any act or omission of

Northington Partners finally determined by a New Zealand Court of competent jurisdiction to constitute

negligence or bad faith by Northington Partners.

MCK has also agreed to promptly fund Northington Partners for its reasonable costs and expenses

(including legal fees and expenses) in dealing with such claims or proceedings upon presentation by

Northington Partners of the relevant invoices.


Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 39

Appendix 2

Appendix 2. Declarations, Qualifications and Consents

Declarations

This report is dated 24 February 2025 and has been prepared by Northington Partners at the request of

the directors of MCK to fulfil the reporting requirements pursuant to Rule 21 of the Code. This report, or

any part of it, should not be reproduced or used for any other purpose. Northington Partners

specifically disclaims any obligation or liability to any party whatsoever in the event that this report is

supplied or applied for any purpose other than that for which it is intended.

Prior drafts of this report were provided to MCK for review and discussion. Although minor factual

changes to the report were made after the release of the first draft, there were no changes to our

methodology, analysis, or conclusions.

This report is provided for the benefit of all of the Non-associated Shareholders of MCK that are being

asked to consider the Offer, and Northington Partners consents to the distribution of this report to those

people.

Our engagement terms did not contain any term which materially restricted the scope of our work.

Qualifications

Northington Partners provides an independent corporate advisory service to companies operating

throughout New Zealand. The company specialises in mergers and acquisitions, capital raising

support, expert opinions, financial instrument valuations, and business and share valuations.

Northington Partners is retained by a mix of publicly listed companies, substantial privately held

companies, and state-owned enterprises.

The individuals responsible for preparing this report are Greg Anderson B.Com, M.Com (Hons), Ph.D,

Jonathan Burke B.Com (Hons), BCM, and Pedro Monteiro B.Com, MBA. Each individual has a wealth

of experience in providing independent advice to clients relating to the value of business assets and

equity instruments, as well as the choice of appropriate financial structures and governance issues.

Northington Partners has been responsible for the preparation of numerous independent reports in

relation to takeovers, mergers, and a range of other transactions subject to the Takeovers Code and

NZX Listing Rules.

Independence

Northington Partners has not been previously engaged by MCK or (to the best of our knowledge) by

any other party to the Offer in relation to any matter for the Offer that could affect our independence.

None of the Directors or employees of Northington Partners have any other relationship with any of the

directors or substantial security holders of the parties involved in the Offer.

The preparation of this independent report will be Northington Partners’ only involvement in relation to

the Offer. Northington Partners will be paid a fixed fee for its services which is in no way contingent on

the outcome of our analysis or the content of our report.

Northington Partners does not have any conflict of interest that could affect its ability to provide an

unbiased report.

Disclaimer and Restrictions on the Scope of Our Work

In preparing this report, Northington Partners has relied on information provided by MCK. Northington

Partners has not performed anything in the nature of an audit of that information, and does not express

any opinion on the reliability, accuracy, or completeness of the information provided to us and upon

which we have relied.

Northington Partners has used the provided information on the basis that it is true and accurate in

material respects and not misleading by reason of omission or otherwise. Accordingly, neither

Northington Partners nor its directors, employees or agents, accept any responsibility or liability for any

such information being inaccurate, incomplete, unreliable or not soundly based or for any errors in the

analysis, statements and opinions provided in this report resulting directly or indirectly from any such

circumstances or from any assumptions upon which this report is based proving unjustified.


Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 40

Appendix 2

We reserve the right, but will be under no obligation, to review or amend our report if any additional

information which was in existence on the date of this report was not brought to our attention, or

subsequently comes to light.

Indemnity

MCK has agreed to indemnify Northington Partners (to the maximum extent permitted by law) for all

claims, proceedings, damages, losses (including consequential losses), fines, penalties, costs, charges

and expenses (including legal fees and disbursements) suffered or incurred by Northington Partners in

relation to the preparation of this report, except to the extent resulting from any act or omission of

Northington Partners finally determined by a New Zealand Court of competent jurisdiction to constitute

negligence or bad faith by Northington Partners.

MCK has also agreed to promptly fund Northington Partners for its reasonable costs and expenses

(including legal fees and expenses) in dealing with such claims or proceedings upon presentation by

Northington Partners of the relevant invoices.


APPENDIX: INDEPENDENT ADVISER’S REPORT



Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report






Page |

41

Appendix 3

Appendix 3.

MCK Property Portfolio Market Valuation Details


Property/Location


Property

Valuation

($m)


Valuation

reporting date


Valuer


Valuation method used

Key

valuation assumptions


Discount

rate


Cap.


rate


Price per

room/sq

m ($k)


MSocial Auckland


97,500


31

-

Dec

-

24


Bower Valuations L

imited


Average of DCF and Transaction Comparables methods less an allowance for business disruption and costs of sale


6.25%


5.50%


560


Copthorne Auckland City


10,750


31

-

Dec

-

24


CVAS (NZ) Limited

t/

a Colliers


Average of Capitalised Income, DCF and Transaction Comparables (price per room) methods less an allowance for estimated Capex


11.00%


9.50%


150


Copthorne Bay of Islands


19,250


31

-

Dec

-

24


CVAS (NZ) Limited

t/

a Colliers


Average of Capitalised Income, DCF and Transaction Comparables (price per room) methods less an allowance for estimated Capex


12.00%


10.50%


125


Kingsgate Dunedin


5,200


31

-

Jan

-

25


Bower Valuations L

imited


Transaction Comparables


(price per room) cross

-

checked with DCF and

Capitalised Income


8.50%


8.00%


95


Copthorne Greymouth


11,000


31

-

Jan

-

25


Bower Valuations L

imited


Average of DCF, Capitalised Income and Transaction Comparables


(price per room) methods less an allowance for estimated Capex


9.25%


8.25%


210


Millennium New Plymouth


11,250


31

-

Dec

-

24


CVAS (NZ) Limited

t/

a Colliers


Average of Capitalised Income, DCF and Transaction Comparables


(price per room) methods


10.00%


8.50%


275


Copthorne Palmerston North


10,200


31

-

Dec

-

24


CVAS (NZ) Limited

t/

a Colliers


Average of Capitalised Income, DCF and Transaction Comparables


(price per room) methods less an allowance for estimated Capex


10.50%


9.

0

0%


150


Millennium Queenstown


100,000


11

-

Feb

-

25


CVAS (NZ) Limited

t/

a Colliers


Average of Capitalised Income, DCF and Transaction Comparables


(price per room) methods less an allowance for estimated Capex


9.00%


7.25%


475


Copthorne Queenstown Lakefront


82,000


11

-

Feb

-

25


CVAS (NZ) Limited

t/

a Colliers


Average of Capitalised Income, DCF and Transaction Comparables (price per room) methods less an allowance for estimated Capex


9.00%


7.50%


375


Copthorne Queenstown Lakeview


21,940


31

-

Jan

-

25


Bower Valuations L

imited


Transaction Comparables


(price per room) cross

-

checked with DCF and

Capitalised Income


9.25%


8.50%


484


Millennium Rotorua


66,000


11

-

Feb

-

25


CVAS (NZ) Limited

t/

a Colliers


Average of Capitalised Income, DCF and Transaction Comparables


(price per room) methods less an allowance for estimated Capex


9.75%


8.25%


315


Kingsgate Te Anau


10,000


31

-

Jan

-

25


Bower Valuations L

imited


Average of DCF, Capitalised Income and Transaction Comparables


(price per room) methods less an allowance for estimated Capex


8.75%


8.00%


1

50


Copthorne Wellington


22,750


31

-

Dec

-

24


CVAS (NZ) Limited

t/

a Colliers


Average of Capitalised Income, DCF and Transaction Comparables


(price per room) methods


10.75%


9.25%


200


Copthorne Rotorua


10,100


31

-

Dec

-

24


CVAS (NZ) Limited

t/

a Colliers


Land value deducted by an allowance for demolition costs


n/a


n/a


0

.4

/sqm


Queenstown


(surplus land)


18,000


31

-

Jan

-

25


Bower Valuations

L

imited


Market comparison


(rate per sqm)


n/a


n/a


2.5


Palmerston North


(surplus land)


6,300


31

-

Dec

-

24


CVAS (NZ) Limited

t/

a Colliers


Market comparison


(rate per sqm)


n/a


n/a


0.6


Rotorua


(surplus land)


5,675


31

-

Dec

-

24


CVAS (NZ) Limited

t/

a Colliers


Market comparison


(rate per sqm)


n/a


n/a


0.4


Te Anau


(surplus land)


1,900


31

-

Jan

-

25


Bower Valuations

L

imited


Market comparison


(rate per sqm)


n/a


n/a


n/a



Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 42

Appendix 4

Appendix 4. Comparable Companies and Transactions

EBITDA Multiples of Comparable Trading Companies

Company Country

Market Cap

($NZ m)

Enterprise

Value ($NZ m)

EV/EBITDA Multiple

LTM NTM

Asset-light hotel operators


Marriott International United States 149,387 174,267 22.3 x 18.8 x

Hilton Worldwide Holdings United States 114,752 133,745 29.0 x 20.4 x

InterContinental Hotels Group United Kingdom 37,674 42,493 23.4 x 19.2 x

Hyatt Hotels Corporation United States 27,858 31,918 21.5 x 15.8 x

Wyndham Hotels & Resorts United States 14,914 19,185 17.7 x 14.8 x

Choice Hotels International United States 12,696 15,989 18.1 x 15.1 x

Scandic Hotels Group AB Sweden 2,817 9,890 9.3 x 8.9 x

Average (Asset-light)


20.2 x 16.1 x

Median (Asset-light)


21.5 x 15.8 x

Asset-heavy hotel operators



Accor SA France 21,797 27,902 13.9 x 12.8 x

City Developments Ltd Singapore 5,905 20,746 19.7 x 13.8 x

Minor International Ltd Thailand 7,563 17,236 8.0 x 7.2 x

Shangri-La Asia Ltd Hong Kong 4,361 14,116 9.8 x 15.5 x

Pandox AB Sweden 6,311 12,420 19.5 x 17.9 x

CapitaLand Ascott Trust Singapore 4,314 7,978 18.4 x 17.3 x

Meliá Hotels International Spain 2,915 7,711 8.1 x 7.7 x

Hotel Properties Ltd Singapore 2,432 4,821 34.0 x n/a

Playa Hotels & Resorts N.V. Netherlands 2,782 4,313 10.1 x 10.0 x

Mandarin Oriental International Hong Kong 3,911 4,296 17.5 x n/a

PPHE Hotel Group Netherlands 1,214 4,026 14.0 x 12.8 x

Dalata Hotel Group Ireland 1,829 3,551 8.6 x 8.4 x

EVT Limited Australia 2,086 3,435 11.0 x 10.4 x

CDL Hospitality Trusts Singapore 1,354 3,195 22.0 x 18.7 x

Far East Orchard Ltd Singapore 657 1,332 13.7 x n/a

Banyan Tree Holdings Ltd Singapore 379 884 13.5 x n/a

Amara Holdings Ltd Singapore 454 863 20.4 x n/a

Heeton Holdings Ltd Singapore 172 756 19.5 x n/a

Hotel Grand Central Ltd Singapore 691 401 8.0 x n/a

Stamford Land Corporation Ltd Singapore 727 362 5.7 x n/a

Average (Asset-heavy)


14.8 x 12.7 x

Median (Asset-heavy)


13.8 x 12.8 x

Source: S&P Capital IQ (10 February 2025)




Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report






Page |

41

Appendix 3

Appendix 3.

MCK Property Portfolio Market Valuation Details


Property/Location


Property

Valuation

($m)


Valuation

reporting date


Valuer


Valuation method used

Key

valuation assumptions


Discount

rate


Cap.


rate


Price per

room/sq

m ($k)


MSocial Auckland


97,500


31

-

Dec

-

24


Bower Valuations L

imited


Average of DCF and Transaction Comparables methods less an allowance for business disruption and costs of sale


6.25%


5.50%


560


Copthorne Auckland City


10,750


31

-

Dec

-

24


CVAS (NZ) Limited

t/

a Colliers


Average of Capitalised Income, DCF and Transaction Comparables (price per room) methods less an allowance for estimated Capex


11.00%


9.50%


150


Copthorne Bay of Islands


19,250


31

-

Dec

-

24


CVAS (NZ) Limited

t/

a Colliers


Average of Capitalised Income, DCF and Transaction Comparables (price per room) methods less an allowance for estimated Capex


12.00%


10.50%


125


Kingsgate Dunedin


5,200


31

-

Jan

-

25


Bower Valuations L

imited


Transaction Comparables


(price per room) cross

-

checked with DCF and

Capitalised Income


8.50%


8.00%


95


Copthorne Greymouth


11,000


31

-

Jan

-

25


Bower Valuations L

imited


Average of DCF, Capitalised Income and Transaction Comparables


(price per room) methods less an allowance for estimated Capex


9.25%


8.25%


210


Millennium New Plymouth


11,250


31

-

Dec

-

24


CVAS (NZ) Limited

t/

a Colliers


Average of Capitalised Income, DCF and Transaction Comparables


(price per room) methods


10.00%


8.50%


275


Copthorne Palmerston North


10,200


31

-

Dec

-

24


CVAS (NZ) Limited

t/

a Colliers


Average of Capitalised Income, DCF and Transaction Comparables


(price per room) methods less an allowance for estimated Capex


10.50%


9.

0

0%


150


Millennium Queenstown


100,000


11

-

Feb

-

25


CVAS (NZ) Limited

t/

a Colliers


Average of Capitalised Income, DCF and Transaction Comparables


(price per room) methods less an allowance for estimated Capex


9.00%


7.25%


475


Copthorne Queenstown Lakefront


82,000


11

-

Feb

-

25


CVAS (NZ) Limited

t/

a Colliers


Average of Capitalised Income, DCF and Transaction Comparables (price per room) methods less an allowance for estimated Capex


9.00%


7.50%


375


Copthorne Queenstown Lakeview


21,940


31

-

Jan

-

25


Bower Valuations L

imited


Transaction Comparables


(price per room) cross

-

checked with DCF and

Capitalised Income


9.25%


8.50%


484


Millennium Rotorua


66,000


11

-

Feb

-

25


CVAS (NZ) Limited

t/

a Colliers


Average of Capitalised Income, DCF and Transaction Comparables


(price per room) methods less an allowance for estimated Capex


9.75%


8.25%


315


Kingsgate Te Anau


10,000


31

-

Jan

-

25


Bower Valuations L

imited


Average of DCF, Capitalised Income and Transaction Comparables


(price per room) methods less an allowance for estimated Capex


8.75%


8.00%


1

50


Copthorne Wellington


22,750


31

-

Dec

-

24


CVAS (NZ) Limited

t/

a Colliers


Average of Capitalised Income, DCF and Transaction Comparables


(price per room) methods


10.75%


9.25%


200


Copthorne Rotorua


10,100


31

-

Dec

-

24


CVAS (NZ) Limited

t/

a Colliers


Land value deducted by an allowance for demolition costs


n/a


n/a


0

.4

/sqm


Queenstown


(surplus land)


18,000


31

-

Jan

-

25


Bower Valuations

L

imited


Market comparison


(rate per sqm)


n/a


n/a


2.5


Palmerston North


(surplus land)


6,300


31

-

Dec

-

24


CVAS (NZ) Limited

t/

a Colliers


Market comparison


(rate per sqm)


n/a


n/a


0.6


Rotorua


(surplus land)


5,675


31

-

Dec

-

24


CVAS (NZ) Limited

t/

a Colliers


Market comparison


(rate per sqm)


n/a


n/a


0.4


Te Anau


(surplus land)


1,900


31

-

Jan

-

25


Bower Valuations

L

imited


Market comparison


(rate per sqm)


n/a


n/a


n/a



Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 42

Appendix 4

Appendix 4. Comparable Companies and Transactions

EBITDA Multiples of Comparable Trading Companies

Company Country

Market Cap

($NZ m)

Enterprise

Value ($NZ m)

EV/EBITDA Multiple

LTM NTM

Asset-light hotel operators


Marriott International United States 149,387 174,267 22.3 x 18.8 x

Hilton Worldwide Holdings United States 114,752 133,745 29.0 x 20.4 x

InterContinental Hotels Group United Kingdom 37,674 42,493 23.4 x 19.2 x

Hyatt Hotels Corporation United States 27,858 31,918 21.5 x 15.8 x

Wyndham Hotels & Resorts United States 14,914 19,185 17.7 x 14.8 x

Choice Hotels International United States 12,696 15,989 18.1 x 15.1 x

Scandic Hotels Group AB Sweden 2,817 9,890 9.3 x 8.9 x

Average (Asset-light)


20.2 x 16.1 x

Median (Asset-light)


21.5 x 15.8 x

Asset-heavy hotel operators



Accor SA France 21,797 27,902 13.9 x 12.8 x

City Developments Ltd Singapore 5,905 20,746 19.7 x 13.8 x

Minor International Ltd Thailand 7,563 17,236 8.0 x 7.2 x

Shangri-La Asia Ltd Hong Kong 4,361 14,116 9.8 x 15.5 x

Pandox AB Sweden 6,311 12,420 19.5 x 17.9 x

CapitaLand Ascott Trust Singapore 4,314 7,978 18.4 x 17.3 x

Meliá Hotels International Spain 2,915 7,711 8.1 x 7.7 x

Hotel Properties Ltd Singapore 2,432 4,821 34.0 x n/a

Playa Hotels & Resorts N.V. Netherlands 2,782 4,313 10.1 x 10.0 x

Mandarin Oriental International Hong Kong 3,911 4,296 17.5 x n/a

PPHE Hotel Group Netherlands 1,214 4,026 14.0 x 12.8 x

Dalata Hotel Group Ireland 1,829 3,551 8.6 x 8.4 x

EVT Limited Australia 2,086 3,435 11.0 x 10.4 x

CDL Hospitality Trusts Singapore 1,354 3,195 22.0 x 18.7 x

Far East Orchard Ltd Singapore 657 1,332 13.7 x n/a

Banyan Tree Holdings Ltd Singapore 379 884 13.5 x n/a

Amara Holdings Ltd Singapore 454 863 20.4 x n/a

Heeton Holdings Ltd Singapore 172 756 19.5 x n/a

Hotel Grand Central Ltd Singapore 691 401 8.0 x n/a

Stamford Land Corporation Ltd Singapore 727 362 5.7 x n/a

Average (Asset-heavy)


14.8 x 12.7 x

Median (Asset-heavy)


13.8 x 12.8 x

Source: S&P Capital IQ (10 February 2025)



APPENDIX: INDEPENDENT ADVISER’S REPORT


Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 43

Appendix 4

EBITDA Multiples of Comparable Transactions

Target Acquirer Location Date

Transaction

Value ($m)

EV / LTM

EBITDA

EV / NTM

EBITDA

Millennium & Copthorne Related Transactions



Mayfair Luxury Hotels

Limited

Millennium & Copthorne

Hotels NZ Ltd

New Zealand 23/10/2024 32 n/a 15.0 x

Sofitel Brisbane Central

Hotel

Millennium & Copthorne

Hotels NZ Ltd; City

Developments Ltd

Australia 15/12/2023 191 n/a 17.9 x

Millennium & Copthorne

Hotels plc (35% share)

City Developments Ltd United

Kingdom

7/06/2019 1,484 16.5 x 16.2 x

Average


569 16.5 x 16.4 x

Median


191 16.5 x 16.2 x

Other Transactions


Eumundi Group SEQ Hospitality Group Australia 30/10/2024 117 13.7 x n/a

Hilton Boston Back Bay Certares Management;

Belcourt Capital Partners

United States 29/02/2024 281 10.2 x n/a

Amara Holdings (73%) Dymon Asia Private Equity Singapore 14/11/2023 710 19.0 x n/a

Alloggio Group Next Capital Australia 27/03/2023 115 10.8 x n/a

Sofitel Philadelphia Hotel Investor Group United States 3/08/2022 128 21.1 x n/a

easyHotel ICAMAP; Cadim Fonds United

Kingdom

5/08/2019 223 n/a 21.8 x

Radisson Hospitality (49%) Jinjiang International

Holdings

Belgium 11/12/2018 1,024 6.9 x 5.9 x

The Ritz-Carlton, Lake

Tahoe

Braemar Hotels & Resorts United States 13/11/2018 165 13.4 x n/a

Hilton Alexandria Old Town Ashford Hospitality Trust United States 26/06/2018 162 12.1 x n/a

NH Hotel Group (18%) Minor International Group Spain 6/06/2018 704 12.6 x 10.5 x

AccorInvest Group (58%) GIC; Colony NorthStar;

Crédit Agricole; Amundi

Luxembourg 27/02/2018 7,661 12.0 x n/a

Mantra Group AAPC Limited Australia 9/10/2017 1,502 13.0 x 11.6 x

Crowne Plaza Hotel Atlanta

at Ravinia

Hospitality Properties Trust United States 29/06/2017 121 15.3 x n/a

Park Hyatt Beaver Creek

Resort and Spa

Ashford Hospitality Prime

(Braemar Hotels & Resorts)

United States 10/03/2017 210 14.9 x n/a

Global Premium Hotels

(35%)

Investor Group Singapore 23/02/2017 152 29.0 x n/a

Hilton Garden Inn,

Chelsea, New York

Investor Group United States 14/07/2016 90 13.5 x n/a

Starwood Hotels & Resorts

Worldwide

Marriott International United States 16/11/2015 23,413 13.5 x 13.4 x

Jupiter Hotels Holdings Fico Holding; S Hotels and

Resorts

United

Kingdom

12/10/2015 353 13.8 x n/a

Average (Tier 2) 2, 063 14.4 x 12.6 x

Median (Tier 2) 217 13.5 x 11.6 x

Average (Overall) 1,849 14.5 x 14.0 x

Median (Overall) 210 13.5 x 14.2 x

Source: S&P Capital IQ (10 February 2025); MCK




Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited – Independent Adviser’s Report Page | 43

Appendix 4

EBITDA Multiples of Comparable Transactions

Target Acquirer Location Date

Transaction

Value ($m)

EV / LTM

EBITDA

EV / NTM

EBITDA

Millennium & Copthorne Related Transactions



Mayfair Luxury Hotels

Limited

Millennium & Copthorne

Hotels NZ Ltd

New Zealand 23/10/2024 32 n/a 15.0 x

Sofitel Brisbane Central

Hotel

Millennium & Copthorne

Hotels NZ Ltd; City

Developments Ltd

Australia 15/12/2023 191 n/a 17.9 x

Millennium & Copthorne

Hotels plc (35% share)

City Developments Ltd United

Kingdom

7/06/2019 1,484 16.5 x 16.2 x

Average


569 16.5 x 16.4 x

Median


191 16.5 x 16.2 x

Other Transactions


Eumundi Group SEQ Hospitality Group Australia 30/10/2024 117 13.7 x n/a

Hilton Boston Back Bay Certares Management;

Belcourt Capital Partners

United States 29/02/2024 281 10.2 x n/a

Amara Holdings (73%) Dymon Asia Private Equity Singapore 14/11/2023 710 19.0 x n/a

Alloggio Group Next Capital Australia 27/03/2023 115 10.8 x n/a

Sofitel Philadelphia Hotel Investor Group United States 3/08/2022 128 21.1 x n/a

easyHotel ICAMAP; Cadim Fonds United

Kingdom

5/08/2019 223 n/a 21.8 x

Radisson Hospitality (49%) Jinjiang International

Holdings

Belgium 11/12/2018 1,024 6.9 x 5.9 x

The Ritz-Carlton, Lake

Tahoe

Braemar Hotels & Resorts United States 13/11/2018 165 13.4 x n/a

Hilton Alexandria Old Town Ashford Hospitality Trust United States 26/06/2018 162 12.1 x n/a

NH Hotel Group (18%) Minor International Group Spain 6/06/2018 704 12.6 x 10.5 x

AccorInvest Group (58%) GIC; Colony NorthStar;

Crédit Agricole; Amundi

Luxembourg 27/02/2018 7,661 12.0 x n/a

Mantra Group AAPC Limited Australia 9/10/2017 1,502 13.0 x 11.6 x

Crowne Plaza Hotel Atlanta

at Ravinia

Hospitality Properties Trust United States 29/06/2017 121 15.3 x n/a

Park Hyatt Beaver Creek

Resort and Spa

Ashford Hospitality Prime

(Braemar Hotels & Resorts)

United States 10/03/2017 210 14.9 x n/a

Global Premium Hotels

(35%)

Investor Group Singapore 23/02/2017 152 29.0 x n/a

Hilton Garden Inn,

Chelsea, New York

Investor Group United States 14/07/2016 90 13.5 x n/a

Starwood Hotels & Resorts

Worldwide

Marriott International United States 16/11/2015 23,413 13.5 x 13.4 x

Jupiter Hotels Holdings Fico Holding; S Hotels and

Resorts

United

Kingdom

12/10/2015 353 13.8 x n/a

Average (Tier 2) 2, 063 14.4 x 12.6 x

Median (Tier 2) 217 13.5 x 11.6 x

Average (Overall) 1,849 14.5 x 14.0 x

Median (Overall) 210 13.5 x 14.2 x

Source: S&P Capital IQ (10 February 2025); MCK




APPENDIX: INDEPENDENT ADVISER’S REPORT

Millennium Hotel Queenstown Superior Twin Room and bathroom.

Support Office
Tel: (09) 353 5010

Level 7, 23 Customs Street East, Auckland 1010

PO Box 5640, Victoria Street West, Auckland 1142

National Conference Office

Tel: 0800 4 MEETINGS (0800 4 633 846)

Email: meetings@millenniumhotels.co.nz

www.meetingsnz.co.nz

Sales

Email: sales.marketing@millenniumhotels.co.nz

International Sales Tel: (09) 353 5085

Corporate Sales Auckland Tel: (09) 353 5010

Corporate Sales Wellington Tel: (04) 382 0770

Central Reservations

Ph: 0800 808 228

Email: central.res@millenniumhotels.co.nz

www.millenniumhotels.com

---

24 February 2025
Target Company Statement in response to CDLHH NZ takeover offer

Independent Director’s Recommendation: Do not accept the CDLHH NZ offer

The Independent Directors of Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited (MCK, the

Company, NZX: MCK) strongly recommend that shareholders DO NOT ACCEPT the takeover offer

(the Offer) made on 10 February 2025 by CDL Hotels Holdings New Zealand Limited (CDLHH NZ).


The Independent Directors believe the Offer price is too low and inadequate. In particular, the Offer

price of $2.25 per ordinary share is significantly below the Independent Adviser’s valuation range of

$4.40 to $5.00 per ordinary share, with a midpoint of $4.70.


The reasons for the Independent Directors’ recommendation to not accept the Offer are set out in

full in the Target Company Statement which accompanies this announcement and is being sent to

holders of ordinary shares today. The Target Company Statement also incorporates the

Independent Adviser’s Report prepared by Northington Partners Limited (Independent Adviser).


Chair of the Independent Directors Committee, Leslie Preston, said: “Our core focus is to deliver

value to all MCK shareholders, and we want all of our shareholders to benefit from the future value

we believe is available through MCK. We believe that if the major shareholder wishes to acquire all

of MCK, it should pay an appropriate price.


“The Independent Directors are firmly of the view that CDLHH NZ’s current Offer is too low and is

inadequate - the current Offer price of $2.25 per ordinary share is significantly below the bottom of

the Independent Adviser’s range of $4.40 per ordinary share and it does not adequately reflect the

market value of MCK’s hotel and property assets or the recent investments made into

refurbishments, upgrades and acquisitions. Additionally, the Offer undervalues the benefits which

can be expected as the tourism and property markets recover.


“We recommend shareholders do not accept the current offer. To do this, shareholders should

simply disregard the Offer documents sent by CDLHH NZ and take no action.”


The Independent Adviser has concluded that: “the mid-point value of our assessed value range ($4.70

per share) is more than double the Offer Price of $2.25. Even allowing for a reasonable margin of error

in relation to our valuation, we conclude that the Offer significantly undervalues the Company

.”


Holders of ordinary shares should read the Target Company Statement (including the Independent

Adviser’s Report) carefully and in full before deciding what action to take in response to CDLHH NZ’s

offer. The Offer must remain open until at least 5.00pm NZT on 8 May 2025. There is no benefit to

shareholders in accepting the Offer early. Shareholders are encouraged to seek professional

investment and/or legal advice if they have any questions in respect of the offer.


ENDS


Issued by Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited

For shareholder enquiries about the Offer, please email: enquiries@mckhotels.co.nz

For other investor relations enquiries, please contact Stuart Harrison, Managing Director, t: +64 21 869 216

e: stuart.harrison@millenniumhotels.com


For media enquiries please contact: Jackie Ellis, t: +64 27 2462505 e: jackie@ellisandco.co.nz


About Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited

Millennium & Copthorne Hotels New Zealand Limited (NZX:MCK) is the only NZSX listed hotel owner-operator with 19

owned/leased/franchised hotels based in New Zealand under the Millennium, Grand Millennium, M Social,

Copthorne and Kingsgate brands. As part of the Millennium & Copthorne Hotels group, we are proud to be part of a

global network of over 120 properties in gateway cities across Asia, Europe, North America, the Middle East and New

Zealand. MCK also has property interests in Australia through its Kingsgate Group subsidiaries including a 50%

ownership interest in the Sofitel Hotel Brisbane Central through a joint venture. MCK is the majority shareholder in

land developer CDL Investments New Zealand Limited (NZX:CDI).

For more information, visit our website: www.millenniumhotels.co.nz

Data sourced from publicly available filings. Our datasets may not be complete. Automated analysis can produce errors. If you believe any data on this page is incorrect, please contact us at hello@nzxplorer.co.nz. For informational purposes only. Not investment advice.