Pacific Edge Limited logo

Q4 25 Cxbladder Volumes Rise and Key Metrics Improve

Quarterly Update3 April 2025PEBHealthcare

4 April 2025


Q4 25 CXBLADDER VOLUMES RISE AND KEY METRICS IMPROVE

Pacific Edge sees lift in number of US clinicians ordering Cxbladder and number of tests

ordered per clinician


DUNEDIN, New Zealand – Cancer diagnostics company Pacific Edge (NZX, ASX: PEB) today

announces tests processed at its laboratories in Q4 25 improved 6.8% on the prior quarter (Q3

25), lifted by increased adoption in the US.

Total laboratory throughput (TLT) in Q4 25 rose to 7,577 tests from 7,092 tests in Q3 25.

Q4 25 US TLT was 6,490 tests up 11.7% from the 5,808 tests in Q3 25, lifted by an increase

in the number of unique US ordering clinicians to 914 from 866

1

in Q3 25 and an increase in

the number of tests each US clinician orders to 7.1 from 6.7

1

in Q3 25. The US volume lift

follows continuing incremental improvements in sales force efficiency, up to 406 tests per sales

FTE from 379 tests in Q3 25, and a seasonal post-holiday rebound.

The American Urological Association’s (AUA) February 2025 inclusion of Cxbladder Triage

with a ‘Grade A’

2

evidence rating in its new microhematuria guideline has changed our sales

pitch to clinicians, medical policy makers and healthcare payers, and generated renewed

interest in Cxbladder among the broader urology customer base.

The longer-term impact of this change may take some time to affect the daily lab throughput

figures, and as we await various coverage-related events, our commercial team will focus on

profitability per sales resource in the wake of the guideline update before seeking to expand

the size of the team. Further commentary on the implications of this guideline for Pacific Edge

are detailed in the investor update released today.

Q4 25 Asia Pacific TLT was 1,087 tests down 15% on the 1,284 tests in Q3 25, with the

decrease partly reflecting a reduction in evaluation and clinical study volumes as we continue

to focus on commercial testing volumes and see the impact of budgetary constraints within

some Health New Zealand – Te Whatu Ora regions.

Total volumes for the year to the end of March 2025 (FY 25) were down 11.5% to 28,894 tests

from 32,633 in FY 24, with the fall reflecting the reduction in the sales force compared to the

prior financial year in response to the uncertainty over Medicare coverage of Cxbladder.

In addition to the commentary on the guideline, the Q4 25 investor update also provides:


1

The number of ordering clinicians in Q3 25 and the tests per ordering clinician has been restated to

reflect post period adjustments.

2

The AUA defines ‘Grade A’ evidence as evidence with a high certainty rating and notes evidence of

this grade makes it "very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect".





- An overview of the new evidence demonstrating the clinical utility of Cxbladder Monitor

in the surveillance for the recurrence of bladder cancer and the cost savings it delivers

to healthcare payers.

- Our formal rebuttal of the evidentiary review of ‘Genetic Testing in Oncology: Specific

Tests’ (L39365) Local Coverage Determination released on 9 January 2025.

- Advances in our clinical evidence generation program and how the AUA guideline

inclusion has further validated the role our clinical science team plays in creating

shareholder value.


Released for an on behalf of Pacific Edge by Grant Gibson, Chief Financial Officer.

For more information:

Investors: Media:

Dr Peter Meintjes Richard Inder

Chief Executive The Project

Pacific Edge P: +64 21 645 643

P: 022 032 1263

OVERVIEW

Pacific Edge: www.pacificedgedx.com

Pacific Edge Limited (NZX/ ASX: PEB) is a global cancer diagnostics company leading the way

in the development and commercialization of bladder cancer diagnostic and prognostic tests

for patients presenting with hematuria or surveillance of recurrent disease. Headquartered in

Dunedin, New Zealand, the company provides its suite of Cxbladder tests globally through its

wholly owned, and CLIA certified, laboratories in New Zealand and the USA.

Cxbladder: www.cxbladder.com

Cxbladder is a urine-based genomic biomarker test optimized for the detection and surveillance

of bladder cancer. The Cxbladder evidence portfolio developed over the past 14 years includes

more than 20 peer reviewed publications for primary detection, surveillance, adjudication of

atypical urine cytology and equivocal cystoscopy. Cxbladder is the focal point of numerous

ongoing and planned clinical studies to generate an ever-increasing body of clinical utility

evidence supporting adoption and use in the clinic to improve patient health outcomes.

Cxbladder has been trusted by over 4,400 US urologists in the diagnosis and management of

more than 100,000 patients, including the option for in-home sample collection. In New

Zealand, Cxbladder is accessible to 75% of the population via public healthcare and all

residents have the option of buying the test online.

---

APRIL 2025
INVESTOR UPDATE

INSIDE

Letter from the CEO 2

Q4 25 test volumes 3

AUA Guideline supportive of

commercial operations 5

Guideline features at SESAUA

Meeting 6

Rebutting Novitas’ evidentiary

review 6

Monitor gets support in Australia 7

Clinical study program update 9

Dear Shareholders,
The American Urological Association’s (AUA)

2025 amendment to the microhematuria guideline

was an important moment for the AUA, and highly

consequential for urologists, healthcare payers

and providers of advanced non-invasive urine-

based diagnostics worldwide. It was particularly

consequential for Pacific Edge, with Cxbladder Triage

receiving a ‘Grade A’

1

recommendation in the guideline

and specific language on its use.

The amendments stand in sharp contrast to

the 2020 guideline, which guided against the use

of urine-based biomarkers in lieu of a cystoscopy.

In making the change, the AUA has demonstrated

its determination to support innovation in

urological practice and improvements

to the existing standard of care by

integrating genomic biomarkers

as an alternative for physicians

to consider as part of their

evaluation of hematuria patients.

It is a significant move that

aligns the AUA guideline

with established practices for

prostate, breast, colon and other

cancers. It also offers significant

benefits to patients, reducing

the burden of unnecessary

cystoscopies in lower risk patients

and improving access to care for a

greater number of patients.

Of importance to investors is that the

language used in the guideline is among the strongest

that could have been envisaged given the available

published evidence, the most significant of which is

our STRATA randomized controlled study

2

. We will

publish more clinical utility evidence for Triage Plus

(the focus of the CREDIBLE study) (see page 9) as

we look to further expand the indications for our tests

in line with our long-term goal to establish Cxbladder

as the preferred urine-biomarker for genomic risk

stratification of hematuria patients.

Meanwhile, the AUA’s recognition of Cxbladder

Triage as the only biomarker with ‘Grade A’ evidence

sends a very strong message to the market.

We have long maintained that the quality of our clinical

evidence establishes the greatest possible barrier for

our competitors. This recommendation reinforces

our first-mover advantage. Meanwhile we are further

differentiated from other urine-based biomarkers

in hematuria evaluation by the intended use to risk

stratify microhematuria populations. Other tests have

only established utility as adjunctive tests to resolve

atypical cytologies and equivocal cystoscopies. These

clear points of difference profoundly mark the ‘moat’

around our business and that we have no current peers.

This achievement, driven by our Clinical Science team,

underscores their pivotal role in creating long-term

value for our shareholders.

From a business perspective, the guideline is

a substantial strategic milestone on which

to build our commercial operations.

We expect the guideline to catalyze

increased testing volume and revenue

despite coverage uncertainty.

Similarly, we expect this to drive

medical policy and commercial

contracting conversations with

the vast number of healthcare

plans in the US such as those

with Blue Cross Blue Shield we

highlighted in the Q3 25 update in

January. It also future proofs Triage

against an ever-increasing evidence

threshold for reimbursement, and it

stands to entrench reliable reimbursement

of Cxbladder, so that we can focus on scaling

our commercial activities profitably without the

distraction of reimbursement risk.

The biggest short-term opportunity is to leverage

the guideline language in our ongoing policy dialogue

and legal action with Novitas and our engagement

with the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services

(CMS) over the adverse ‘Genetic Testing in Oncology:

Specific Tests’ (L39365) local coverage determination

(LCD) (see page 3). This LCD, released in January, and

the uncertainty created by its predecessor ‘Genetic

Testing for Oncology’ (DL39365), have continued

to limit the growth of our US business to a rate well

below its potential (see page 3).

LETTER FROM THE CEO

Guideline inclusion validates

and accelerates strategy

“The guideline

clearly marks the

‘moat’ around

our business and

that we have no

genuine peers.”

2

1

The AUA defines ‘Grade A’ evidence as evidence with a high certainty rating and notes evidence of this grade makes it “very confident that the true effect lies close to

that of the estimate of the effect”.

2

Lotan Y, Daneshmand S, Shore N, Black P, Scarpato KP, Patel A, Lough T, Shoskes DA, Raman JD. A Multicenter Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing

Cxbladder Triage to Cystoscopy in Patients With Microhematuria. The Safe Testing of Risk for Asymptomatic Microhematuria Trial. J Urol 2024

With Cxbladder Triage now in the AUA guideline,
our Clinical Science team is focused on coverage and

guidelines inclusion for Triage Plus and Monitor Plus,

while our R&D Team is focused on simplifying our

portfolio of Cxbladder tests as In Vitro Diagnostic

(IVD)-ready versions. Implicit in this vision for

innovation is that we will need to place greater

emphasis on the ‘D’ in R&D, thus creating the

opportunity for decentralized deployment for our

tests in the rest of the world.

The challenge for Pacific Edge is to make the

most of the immediate commercial opportunities we

have created. In the US this means being recognized

for not only delivering the best clinical outcomes in

the market – a title we can now confidently claim for

Cxbladder Triage with the AUA’s endorsement – but

also for offering the simplest user experience.

We will achieve this second goal by investing in

digital connections that streamline test ordering and

results delivery for an excellent customer experience.

These investments include new integrations with

electronic medical record and pathology laboratory

systems - building on the successful implementations

with organizations like Kaiser Permanente and

Lumea – and enhancements to our customer

portal for clients unable to connect directly to our

systems. Additionally, we need to further develop

and appropriately incentivize our sales, customer

service, and medical affairs teams, empowering them

to effectively communicate and deliver Cxbladder’s

clinical and economic value wherever demand is

identified.

We remain steadfast on our vision, while adaptable

regarding how we deliver, and I am looking forward to

reporting on progress in the new financial year.

With my warm regards,

Dr Peter Meintjes

Chief Executive

LETTER FROM THE CEO CONTINUED

Cxbladder tests processed at Pacific Edge’s laboratories in laboratories in Q4 25 improved 6.8% on the

prior quarter (Q3 25), lifted by increased adoption in the US.

Cxbladder tests processed at Pacific Edge’s laboratories in laboratories in Q4 25 improved 6.8% on the

prior quarter (Q3 25), lifted by increased adoption in the US.

Total laboratory throughput (TLT) in Q4 25 rose to 7,577 tests from 7,092 tests in Q3 25.

Q4 25 US TLT was 6,490 tests up 11.7% from the 5,808 tests in Q3 25, lifted by an increase in the

number of unique US ordering clinicians to 914 from 866

1

in Q3 25 and an increase in the number of

tests each US clinician orders to 7.1 from 6.7

1

in Q3 25. The US volume lift follows continuing incremental

improvements in sales force efficiency, up to 406 tests per sales FTE from 379 tests in Q3 25, and a

seasonal post-holiday rebound.

The American Urological Association’s (AUA) February 2025 inclusion of Cxbladder Triage with a

‘Grade A’

2

evidence rating in its new microhematuria guideline has changed our sales pitch to clinicians,

medical policy makers and healthcare payers, and generated renewed interest in Cxbladder among the

broader urology customer base.

The longer-term impact of this change may take some time to affect the daily lab throughput figures,

and as we await various coverage-related events, our commercial team will focus on profitability per sales

resource in the wake of the guideline update before seeking to expand the size of the team.

Q4 25 Asia Pacific TLT was 1,087 tests down 15% on the 1,284 tests in Q3 25, with the decrease partly

reflecting a reduction in evaluation and clinical study volumes as we continue to focus on commercial

testing volumes and see the impact of budgetary constraints within some Health New Zealand – Te Whatu

Ora regions.

Total volumes for the year to the end of March 2025 (FY 25) were down 11.5% to 28,894 tests from

32,633 in FY 24, with the fall reflecting the reduction in the sales force compared to the prior financial year

in response to the uncertainty over Medicare coverage of Cxbladder.

TEST VOLUMES

Cxbladder volumes rise with increased US clinical usage

3

1

The number of ordering clinicians in Q3 25 and the tests per ordering clinician has been restated to reflect post period adjustments.

2

The AUA defines ‘Grade A’ evidence as evidence with a high certainty rating and notes evidence of this grade makes it “very confident that the true

effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect”.

-
1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

8,000

9,000

10,000

Test volume

US

Q4 22

5,290

952

6,242

Q1 23

6,073

983

7,056

Q2 25

5,682

1,360

7,042

Q3 25

5,808

1,284

7,092

Q4 25

6,490

1,087

7,577

Q2 23

6,699

1,165

7,864

Q3 23

6,629

1,139

7,768

Q4 23

1,061

8,877

Q1 24

8,627

1,079

9,706

Q2 24

7,335

1,199

8,534

Q3 24

6,041

1,142

7,183

Q1 25

5,905

1,278

7,183

Q4 24

6,099

1,111

7,210

APAC

-

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1,400

1,600

-

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

US Ordering Clinicians

Tests/Clinician

US ORDERING CLINICIANS (LHS)

Q4 22

789

Q1 23

895

890866

Q1 25

867

Q2 25Q3 25Q2 23

978

Q3 23

1,082

Q4 23

1,150

Q1 24

1,232

Q2 24

1,147

Q3 24

1,016

Q4 24

915914

TESTS/ORDERING CLINICIANS (RHS)

7.0

6.1

6.7

6.8

6.8

6.4

6.8

-

10

20

30

40

50

60

-

50

100

150

300

200

250

70350

80400

Average Sales FTE

Average US Test Volume/Sales FTE

US AVERAGE SALES FTE (LHS)US TEST VOLUMES/SALES FTE (RHS)

187

222

226

201

239

288

265

28

Q4 22

27

Q1 23


30

Q2 23

33

Q3 23

33

Q4 23

30

Q1 24

28

Q2 24

21

Q3 24

16

Q4 24

15

Q1 25

15

Q2 25

1516

Q3 25

Q4 25

Q4 25

292

5.9

6.7

381

6.8

403

379

7.1

406

6.4

6.7

379

7,816

-

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

8,000

9,000

10,000

Test volume

US

Q4 22

5,290

952

6,242

Q1 23

6,073

983

7,056

Q2 25

5,682

1,360

7,042

Q3 25

5,808

1,284

7,092

Q4 25

6,490

1,087

7,577

Q2 23

6,699

1,165

7,864

Q3 23

6,629

1,139

7,768

Q4 23

1,061

8,877

Q1 24

8,627

1,079

9,706

Q2 24

7,335

1,199

8,534

Q3 24

6,041

1,142

7,183

Q1 25

5,905

1,278

7,183

Q4 24

6,099

1,111

7,210

APAC

-

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1,400

1,600

-

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

US Ordering Clinicians

Tests/Clinician

US ORDERING CLINICIANS (LHS)

Q4 22

789

Q1 23

895

890866

Q1 25

867

Q2 25Q3 25Q2 23

978

Q3 23

1,082

Q4 23

1,150

Q1 24

1,232

Q2 24

1,147

Q3 24

1,016

Q4 24

915914

TESTS/ORDERING CLINICIANS (RHS)

7.0

6.1

6.7

6.8

6.8

6.4

6.8

-

10

20

30

40

50

60

-

50

100

150

300

200

250

70350

80400

Average Sales FTE

Average US Test Volume/Sales FTE

US AVERAGE SALES FTE (LHS)US TEST VOLUMES/SALES FTE (RHS)

187

222

226

201

239

288

265

28

Q4 22

27

Q1 23


30

Q2 23

33

Q3 23

33

Q4 23

30

Q1 24

28

Q2 24

21

Q3 24

16

Q4 24

15

Q1 25

15

Q2 25

1516

Q3 25

Q4 25

Q4 25

292

5.9

6.7

381

6.8

403

379

7.1

406

6.4

6.7

379

7,816

-

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

8,000

9,000

10,000

Test volume

US

Q4 22

5,290

952

6,242

Q1 23

6,073

983

7,056

Q2 25

5,682

1,360

7,042

Q3 25

5,808

1,284

7,092

Q4 25

6,490

1,087

7,577

Q2 23

6,699

1,165

7,864

Q3 23

6,629

1,139

7,768

Q4 23

1,061

8,877

Q1 24

8,627

1,079

9,706

Q2 24

7,335

1,199

8,534

Q3 24

6,041

1,142

7,183

Q1 25

5,905

1,278

7,183

Q4 24

6,099

1,111

7,210

APAC

-

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1,400

1,600

-

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

US Ordering Clinicians

Tests/Clinician

US ORDERING CLINICIANS (LHS)

Q4 22

789

Q1 23

895

890866

Q1 25

867

Q2 25Q3 25Q2 23

978

Q3 23

1,082

Q4 23

1,150

Q1 24

1,232

Q2 24

1,147

Q3 24

1,016

Q4 24

915914

TESTS/ORDERING CLINICIANS (RHS)

7.0

6.1

6.7

6.8

6.8

6.4

6.8

-

10

20

30

40

50

60

-

50

100

150

300

200

250

70350

80400

Average Sales FTE

Average US Test Volume/Sales FTE

US AVERAGE SALES FTE (LHS)US TEST VOLUMES/SALES FTE (RHS)

187

222

226

201

239

288

265

28

Q4 22

27

Q1 23


30

Q2 23

33

Q3 23

33

Q4 23

30

Q1 24

28

Q2 24

21

Q3 24

16

Q4 24

15

Q1 25

15

Q2 25

1516

Q3 25

Q4 25

Q4 25

292

5.9

6.7

381

6.8

403

379

7.1

406

6.4

6.7

379

7,816

FIGURE 1: TOTAL TEST VOLUMES

1

FIGURE 2: CXBLADDER CLINICAL ADOPTION

FIGURE 3: US SALES FORCE EFFICIENCY

TEST VOLUMES CONTINUED

1

Volumes in some prior quarters of FY24 are marginally different from those reported in earlier investor updates reflecting post period adjustments.

The number of ordering clinicians in Q3 25 and Q1 25 and the tests per ordering clinician in Q3 25 have been restated to reflect post period adjustments.

4

5
REVENUE GENERATION

1

Pacific Edge estimates

2

Lotan Y, Daneshmand S, Shore N, Black P, Scarpato KP, Patel A, Lough T, Shoskes DA, Raman JD. A Multicenter Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing

Cxbladder Triage to Cystoscopy in Patients With Microhematuria. The Safe Testing of Risk for Asymptomatic Microhematuria Trial. J Urol 2024.

3

Harvey JC, Cambridge LM, Ellen CW, Colonval M, Hazlett JA, Newell J, Zhou X, Guilford PJ. Analytical Validation of Cxbladder® Detect, Triage, and Monitor:

Assays for Detection and Management of Urothelial Carcinoma. Diagnostics. 2024; 14(18):2061.


Copyright © 2025 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. ®

1

Any person or company accessing this guideline with the intent of using the guideline for promotional purposes must obtain a licensable copy.


MMIICCRROOHHE EMMAATTUURRIIAA::

AAUUAA//SSUUFFUU GGUUIIDDEELLIINNEE ((22002200,, AAMMEENNDDEEDD 22002255))

Guideline Panel

Daniel A. Barocas, MD, MPH;* Stephen Boorjian, MD;* Ronald Alvarez, MD, MBA;

Tracy M. Downs, MD; Cary P. Gross, MD; Blake Hamilton, MD; Kathleen Kobashi, MD;

Robert Lipman; Yair Lotan, MD; Casey Ng, MD; Matthew Nielsen, MD, MS; Andrew

Peterson, MD; Jay Raman, MD; Rebecca Smith-Bindman, MD

* Equal author contribution

Amendment Panel

Daniel A. Barocas, MD, MPH, FACS; Yair Lotan, MD; Richard S. Matulewicz, MD, MSCI,

MS; Jay D. Raman, MD, FACS, FRCS(Glasg); Mary E. Westerman, MD

Amendment Staff and Consultants

Lauren J. Pak, MHS, MS; Erin Kirkby, MS; Lesley Souter, PhD

SUMMARY

Purpose

The purpose of this guideline is to provide a clinical framework for the diagnosis, evaluation, and follow-up of microhematuria

(MH).

Methodology

OVID was used to systematically search MEDLINE and EMBASE databases for articles evaluating hematuria using criteria

determined by the expert panel. The initial draft evidence report included evidence published from January 2010 through

February 2019. A second search conducted to update the report included studies published up to December 2019. Five

systematic reviews and 91 primary literature studies met the study selection criteria and were chosen to form the evidence

base. These publications were used to create the majority of the clinical framework. When sufficient evidence existed, the

body of evidence for a particular modality was assigned a strength rating of A (high), B (moderate), or C (low); and evidence-

based statements of Strong, Moderate, or Conditional Recommendation were developed. Additional information is provided

as Clinical Principles and Expert Opinions when insufficient evidence exists. In 2024, this Guideline was reviewed via the

AUA update literature review (ULR) process, which identified 82 studies for full-text review that were published between

December 2019 and June 7, 2024. Of those 82 studies, 23 met inclusion criteria for qualitative synthesis. The subsequent

amendment is based on data released since the initial 2020 publication of this Guideline.



American Urological Association (AUA)/

Society of Urodynamics, Female Pelvic Medicine & Urogenital Reconstruction (SUFU)

APPROVED BY THE AUA

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

FEBRUARY 2025

Authors’ disclosure of potential

conflicts of interest and

author/staff contributions appear

at the end of the article.


© 2025 by the American

Urological Association


Guideline supportive of commercial operations

The American Urological Association’s inclusion of Cxbladder Triage as a recommended alternative to the

standard of care in the evaluation of microhematuria (MH) patients, represents a substantial strategic milestone

on which to build our commercial operations.

The guideline, released in late February, will help to reduce the burden of unnecessary cystoscopies for lower risk

patients, resulting in less patient discomfort, lower morbidity, and improved access to care by reducing wait times.

It states urologists may use urine-based biomarkers for intermediate-risk patients presenting with MH to assist

their decision on whether to defer a cystoscopy: “In appropriately counseled intermediate-risk patients who want

to avoid cystoscopy and accept the risk of forgoing direct visual inspection of the bladder urothelium, clinicians

may offer urine cytology or validated urine-based tumor markers... to facilitate the decision regarding the utility of

cystoscopy. Renal and bladder ultrasound should still be performed in these cases.”

Intermediate risk’ patients represent a large serviceable market for Triage, amounting to anywhere from 40-

70% of all MH patients, or up to 3.5 million patients per year in the US alone

1

. This figure represents the base-line

population indicated by the guideline, but we expect through the development of further evidence and clinician

education to extend our addressable market to almost all patients presenting with hematuria.

In a significant achievement, the guideline mentions Cxbladder Triage as the only urine-based biomarker test that

has ‘Grade A’ evidence from a randomized controlled trial (the STRATA study

2

) in support of this recommendation.

The study was the first randomized controlled trial of any urine biomarker and demonstrated that Cxbladder Triage

could safely and effectively reduce cystoscopies by as much as 59% without missing tumors.

The specific mention of Cxbladder Triage in the guideline reinforces our first mover advantage and establishes

a high evidentiary standard that any other test must meet to be competitive.

The largest immediate opportunity is to leverage the guideline language in our ongoing policy dialogue with

Medicare Administrative Contractor Novitas and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services over the adverse

‘Genetic Testing in Oncology: Specific Tests’ (L39365) local coverage determination (LCD) released in January.

Should these discussions not yield the certainty we seek, and the LCD comes into effect on 24 April 2025, we

will use the new guideline, and the evidence ignored by Novitas as it finalized the LCD (including the STRATA

study and updated Analytical Validation studies of Triage and Detect

3

). In the meantime, we have submitted a

reconsideration request for Cxbladder Triage under the ‘Biomarkers for Oncology’ LCD (L35396) using all current

evidence and Novitas has deemed our submission valid.

Separately, the new guideline provides additional support to our contracting negotiations with healthcare

plans across the US and in new markets and will help to catalyze change in the practice of independent

urologists worldwide.

6
GUIDELINES

Guideline success featured at key meeting

EVIDENCE INTEGRITY

Novitas’ flawed understanding of Cxbladder evidence

A Pacific Edge symposium – Cxbladder Triage: Risk Stratification for Patients with Microhematuria – attracted

significant interest at the Annual Meeting of the Southeastern Section of the American Urological Association

(SESAUA) in mid-March.

SESAUA was the first opportunity for Pacific Edge to promote Cxbladder Triage since its inclusion in the

guideline. The symposium was a standing room only event and was led by Dr Zachary Klaassen, Urologic

Oncologist and Associate Professor of Urology; Wellstar MCG Health and the Georgia Cancer Center. It

covered the details of the guideline, and the benefits Cxbladder Triage offered in reducing the burden of

unnecessary cystoscopies for those with a lower risk of cancer, resulting in less patient discomfort and

morbidity.

Watch the symposium online here

Pacific Edge on 20 February released a point-by-point

rebuttal of the evidentiary review used to support

the finalization of the adverse ‘Genetic Testing in

Oncology: Specific Tests’ (L39365) LCD that threatens

to end Medicare coverage of our tests.

Our goal in releasing this rebuttal was to ensure all

our stakeholders – patients, clinicians, medical policy

makers, healthcare payers, our investors and our own

people – understand our confidence in the clinical

value of Cxbladder.

Pacific Edge’s clinical evidence program is

focused on developing high-quality clinical evidence

for Cxbladder tests in a structured framework of

Analytical Validity, Clinical Validity, and Clinical Utility,

with the endpoints and sample sizes required for

coverage decisions and guideline inclusion. Cxbladder

Triage’s February inclusion in the AUA microhematuria

guideline with a ‘Grade A’ classification of the evidence

supporting the use of it is an unequivocal validation

of this approach and contrasts starkly with Novitas’

review of our evidence portfolio.

Our analysis of the LCD evidentiary review found:

- Novitas conflates feasibility testing of biomarkers

in urine with test development of a specific clinical

diagnostic lab test.

- Novitas misinterprets evidence for Cxbladder Triage

and Detect by framing them as screening tests for

an asymptomatic population, rather than tests to

support clinical decision making.

- Novitas misinterprets evidence for Cxbladder

Detect and Triage because it misunderstands the

patient population targeted by the tests (patients

presenting with hematuria, not asymptomatic

patients).

- Novitas misinterprets evidence for Cxbladder

because it does not understand how the information

generated by the tests is used to guide clinical

decision making.

- Novitas has based its evidentiary review on a

preliminary version of the Cxbladder test, referred to

as uRNA-D, which is not the test offered to Medicare

patients.

Our full rebuttal can be downloaded here

CXBLADDER MONITOR SAVINGS
New evidence supports the clinical and economic

value of Cxbladder Monitor

Two new studies examining the deployment of Cxbladder Monitor in

Australia and New Zealand have demonstrated the clinical utility of the

test for the surveillance for the recurrence of bladder cancer and the cost

savings it delivers to healthcare payers. This real-world evidence is further

supported by a new health economics study that demonstrates the savings

the test offers to healthcare payers against the American Urological

Association standard of care.

Monitor garners support in Australia

A new real world evidence study conducted by Northern Health in Melbourne, Australia, has

demonstrated the effectiveness and safety of Cxbladder Monitor as an alternative approach in the

surveillance for bladder cancer recurrence

1

.

The retrospective study was designed to determine whether clinically significant bladder

cancer recurrences, specifically progression to invasive or metastatic disease, were missed using

Northern Health’s protocol, which alternated annually between a Cxbladder Monitor test and flexible

cystoscopy, compared to the standard yearly cystoscopy recommended by the European Association

of Urology (EAU).

The findings highlighted notable clinical and operational benefits including

the significant potential of Monitor to optimize bladder cancer surveillance

programs, reduce healthcare costs, and substantially improve patient

satisfaction and overall healthcare system efficiency.

Notably, the new protocol achieved a 59% reduction in the hospital’s

surveillance cystoscopy waitlist, greatly improving patient access and

resource allocation.

Financial analysis revealed substantial cost savings, with each Monitor

test being approximately A$850 cheaper compared to conventional

cystoscopy, leading to savings for Northern Health.

The budget impact benefits of Monitor were also affirmed in a Pacific

Edge study accepted for publication in the JU Open Plus journal (see page 8).

The researchers concluded, “An alternating Cxbladder Monitor and Flexible

Cystoscopy surveillance protocol can be safely used for NMIBC

2

patients eligible

for annual surveillance, without clinically significant recurrences being missed. This can also alleviate

a health center’s surveillance cystoscopy waitlist and allow improved patient access to cystoscopy.

Cxbladder Monitor was found to be cheaper, and the patients enthusiastically accepted it as an

alternative to cystoscopy.”

7

1

Guduguntla A, Whish-Wilson T, Chandler L, Gyomber D. A novel bladder cancer surveillance schedule

using bladder Cx for patients on annual surveillance. BJUI Compass. 2025;6(1).

2

Non-muscle invasive bladder cancer

“...the new

protocol achieved

a 59% reduction

in the hospital’s

surveillance

cystoscopy”

CXBLADDER MONITOR SAVINGS CONTINUED
Cxbadder Monitor delivers savings in New Zealand

A retrospective study at Te Whatu Ora Health

in Auckland found Cxbladder Monitor, for the

surveillance for the recurrence of low-risk

non-muscle invasive bladder cancer, is more

patient-friendly, safe and saved the health provider

$39,000

1

over a three-year period.

A study led by Dr Alexandra Gower and

colleagues evaluated 206 urine-based Cxbladder

Monitor tests conducted between 2020 and 2023.

Researchers found Cxbladder Monitor detected

19 positive results, with follow-up cystoscopies

confirming recurrence in four cases. Among negative

results, 7% later showed recurrence in follow up

examinations including a single high-grade case (0.5%). Patients reported preferring Cxbladder Monitor,

highlighting the benefits of less anxiety, reduced discomfort, and fewer logistical issues associated with

the test when compared to a cystoscopy.

Meanwhile the analysis found substantial cost savings, with Cxbladder Monitor costing $395 per test

versus $643 for a traditional cystoscopy. Over three years, using Cxbladder Monitor, alternated annually

with cystoscopy reduced total expenses at the health provider by nearly $39,000, averaging about

$13,000 saved per year.

The researchers concluded: “Our findings indicate Cxbladder Monitor provides a safe, efficient, and

patient-preferred alternative to routine cystoscopy surveillance. These results could prompt broader

adoption, significantly impacting how bladder cancer surveillance is managed, balancing cost control

and patient well-being.”

A new health economics study has shown that the inclusion of Cxbladder Monitor into bladder

cancer recurrence surveillance protocols can save healthcare payers as much as $686

2

per

patient over a five year surveillance period.

The study

3

, accepted for publication in the JU Open Plus journal, compared the American

Urological Association (AUA) bladder cancer surveillance protocols, with a new protocol that

included Monitor in the surveillance program nine months after diagnosis. Under the Cxbladder

protocol, cystoscopies were deferred if the Monitor test returned negative results, postponing

invasive examinations until the next routine check-up.

Compared to the AUA standard of care, Cxbladder Monitor reduced mean total costs by

$68,621 for 100 patients over 5 years or $137 per patient per year. Additionally, this approach

reduced the number of cystoscopies by 129 examinations per 100 patients (0.31 per patient per

year), with no difference in delayed cancer diagnosis, highlighting both the economic and clinical

efficiencies of the Cxbladder Monitor test.

... and against the AUA standard of care

8

2

All references to dollar amounts in this item are US dollars.

3

Mark Tyson MD, MPH, John P. Sfakianos MD, Daniel A Shoskes MD, Tobias Muench, Kim Seemann, Rhodri Saunders, Siamak Daneshmand.

Economic Impact Model of Incorporating Cxbladder Monitor in the Surveillance of Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer; article accepted for

publication.

1

All references to dollar amounts in this item are NZ dollars.

CLINICAL EVIDENCE PROGRAM
Evidence to drive clinical practice change

Our clinical study program is at the foundation of Pacific Edge’s value. We are focused on generating the compelling

clinical evidence required to drive behavior change in physicians. Specifically, we seek to produce evidence that

is founded on the frameworks of Analytical Validity (AV), Clinical Validity (CV) and Clinical Utility (CU), with the

endpoints and sample sizes required for coverage decisions and guideline inclusion.

STUDYGOALPOPULATION AND

USE

STATUS

STRATA

Safe Testing

of Risk for

AsymptomaTic

MicrohematuriA

• CU for Triage

• CV/CU for

Triage Plus

(retrospective)

• Microhematuria

(MH)

• Risk stratification

- Recruitment closed with 555 patients including

223 low risk patients (test and control) with

interim analysis results published in Journal of

Urology and led to Guidelines inclusion for 2025

update.

- Monitoring for final analysis completed mid-Aug,

some re-work needed. Database lock expected

Q2 2025 and final Clinical Study Report (CSR)

expected Q3-4 2025.

DRIVE

Detection and

Risk stratification

In VEterans

presenting with

hematuria

• CV for Triage Plus

for a Veterans’

cohort

• Data for MH

pooled analysis

• MH and gross

hematuria (GH)

• Risk stratification

- Enrolment closed with 710 patients enrolled

including 46 tumour confirmed patients

(target was 45) from across 10 US Veteran Affairs

(VA) sites.

- Database lock completed and publication

submission expected by March 2025.

microDRIVE

Detection and

Risk stratification

In VEterans

presenting with

microhematuria

• CV of Triage Plus

• Data for MH

pooled analysis

• MH

• Detection

- Currently a decentralised study across all

VAMC

1

coordinated using a single US VA.

- Protocol amendment approved - 3 more sites to

join in Q2 2025 to increase enrolment.

- 467 patients have consented for the study

with 305 samples received to date.

- The target is 1000 patients with 35 tumour

confirmed patients.

- Last patient in is now projected to be

Q3 2025.

AUSSIE

Australian Urologic

risk Stratification

of patientS wIth

hEmaturia

• CV of Triage

Plus (Australian

cohort)

• Data for MH

pooled analysis

• MH and GH

• Risk stratification

- The target is 35 Urothelial Cancer (UC) confirmed

patients including a minimum of 10 MH patients.

- Currently 543 subjects enrolled with 35 UC

confirmed including 5 MH patients.

- Last patient in projected to be Q3 2025.

POOLED

ANALYSIS

• CV of Triage Plus • MH and GH

• Risk stratification

- MH (and separately GH patient data where

available) from DRIVE, AUSSIE and microDRIVE

will be pooled and performance determined.

- Paper submission is one quarter after publication

of DRIVE, microDRIVE and AUSSIE.

LOBSTER

LOngitudinal

Bladder cancer

Study for

Tumor Recurrence

• CV of Monitor and

Monitor

+

• Surveillance

• Risk stratification

- Enrolment will be complete when 75 UC

recurrences are observed across 10–15 sites.

- Enrolment is 388 subjects providing 894 samples

with 52 UC recurrences observed to date.

- We project last patient in (to observe 75

recurrences) between Q4 2025 to Q2 2026.

CREDIBLE

Cystoscopic

REDuction

In BLadder

Evaluations for

microhematuria

• CU of Triage Plus


• MH

• Risk stratification

- Study level Institutional Review Board (IRB)

approvals received, site level IRB approvals for

7 sites, contracts finalized for 10 of expected 15

sites.

- Currently amending the protocol to address KOL

feedback and adjust to AUA guideline changes.

- Enrolment due to commence 1 April 2025.

Quarterly dates are calendar year not financial years

9

1

Veterans Affairs Medical Centers

ABOUT US
Pacific Edge Limited (NZX/ASX: PEB) is a global cancer diagnostics company leading the way in the development

and commercialization of bladder cancer diagnostic and prognostic tests for patients presenting with hematuria

or surveillance of recurrent disease. Headquartered in Dunedin, New Zealand, the company provides its suite of

Cxbladder tests globally through its wholly owned, and CLIA certified, laboratories in New Zealand and the USA.

VISIT US ONLINE:

www.pacificedgedx.com

www.cxbladder.com

FOLLOW US ON SOCIAL MEDIA:

www.facebook.com/PacificEdgeLtd

www.facebook.com/Cxbladder

www.twitter.com/PacificEdgeLtd

www.twitter.com/Cxbladder

www.linkedin.com/company/pacific-edge-ltd

CONTACT US:

Centre for Innovation

87 St David Street

PO Box 56

Dunedin 9016, New Zealand

T: 0800 555 563 (NZ)

+64 3 577 6733 (Overseas)

E: investors@pacificedge.co.nz

Data sourced from publicly available filings. Our datasets may not be complete. Automated analysis can produce errors. If you believe any data on this page is incorrect, please contact us at hello@nzxplorer.co.nz. For informational purposes only. Not investment advice.