Barramundi Limited/Announcement
Barramundi Limited logo

BRM - March 2025 Quarter Newsletter

Operational Update27 April 2025BRMFinancials

In the March Quarter (“Q1”), Barramundi’s gross performance fell
-9.8%, and the adjusted NAV return was down -10.0%, both lagging

the -3.0% decrease in the benchmark return.

The focus of our Q1 Newsletter is to explore how we have sought

to sensibly take advantage of the significant share price volatility

experienced in the period. In summary, where companies are

performing well operationally, but share prices have fallen (related

to broader market reasons), we have added to our positions. Where

companies have performed poorly, we have been circumspect. In

some cases, we have reduced our weighting, with others we have

sold our shareholding. We have also been measured in responding

to controversy that has embroiled Wisetech, a key investment for us.

Here we have engaged with what we regard as a high-quality business

rather than following the knee-jerk market response by selling our

shares.

We think we will be well served by these activities. Despite the

disappointing start to the year, our portfolio companies are well

positioned to grow their profits over the medium term. This ultimately

will be reflected in their share price returns. We are well positioned to

reap these rewards given the portfolio positioning changes we have

made in Q1.

Significant dispersion of equity returns

across different geographies in Q1

US foreign and trade policy uncertainty drove dispersion of equity

returns across geographies and sectors. Europe sharply outperformed

the American equity market. Information Technology sectors typically

did poorly across markets.

In Australia, equities performed more in line with American indices.

Industrials (+1.5%) and Materials (-1%) buoyed by gold miners were

two of the better sectors in Q1. And as seen in the US, information

technology (-18%) was the worst performing sector and helped drag

the Australian share market lower.

Part of the return dispersion across the ASX was driven by the rising

global economic (and tariff related) uncertainty. Part of this was also

driven by company specific announcements during the semi-annual

financial reporting season in February. Companies that disappointed

market expectations, irrespective of whether it was due to temporary

or more structural reasons, saw their share prices fall sharply.

Opportunity knocks when market

wobbles collide with high performing

companies

Skittish and volatile markets such as those experienced in Q1 present

investors with opportunity.

We capitalised on this by adding to high quality positions including

online classified advertising businesses CAR Group (-12% in A$) and

SEEK (-4%) and the global leader in treating profound hearing loss,

Cochlear (-9%).

These companies are all leaders in their field, with broad economic

moats around their core divisions. The management teams are

performing strongly in this economic climate.

Cochlear received regulatory approvals in Australia and Canada for

its newest sound processor and hinted at further product releases to

come. This lays the foundation for further growth in future years.

SEEK and CAR Group demonstrated tangible progress in delivering

on key profit metrics in what has been a tricky global economic

environment. As a job advertising platform SEEK has little control over

the economy and appetite for businesses to hire employees. But SEEK

did well in what it could control, taking market share in advertising,

lifting prices, controlling costs and investing in new products. In

Australia its share of advertising placements now sits at 35%, over 4x

that of its nearest competitor.

CAR Group has expanded successfully internationally over the last

15yrs. Apart from Australia, it now counts South Korea, the US and

Brazil amongst key meaningful markets that help drive and diversify

its earnings growth. Each of these markets is structurally growing. Like

SEEK, CAR’s management team is juggling its levers of price, cost and

product investment well to provide durability to that growth runway.

We were happy buying more shares in each of these companies that

are selling for less than they were at the start of the year. We have

funded these purchases from a combination of positions that look

relatively more expensive as well as from positions we have exited (see

below).

Balanced approach as we engage with

Wisetech over governance

In responding to the 33% share price drop in software company

Wisetech’s case, the calculus is different. This is reflected in our

measured decision to remain invested but at a lower target weight

than we have been invested in historically.

Wisetech is one of the highest quality companies on the Australian

share market. Its software is solving critical challenges for large

logistics companies. It is becoming ever more important to its customer

base as it increases the number of bottlenecks that it solves for its

customers. It is the clear market leader and has decades of growth

ahead of it.

Personal controversy related to the founder (and Wisetech’s largest

shareholder) Richard White, resulted in a stoush with the Board. This

ended with four independent Board members resigning abruptly in

February. This governance turmoil saw a number of large shareholders

exit their positions. This was the primary driver of recent share price

weakness.

We are deeply unhappy with the governance turmoil. But rather

than sell our position at what we think is now a compellingly cheap

valuation, we elected to engage with the company. Alongside other

institutional shareholders who also see merit in this approach, we have

actively encouraged the company to take expeditious yet orderly steps

to refresh the Board. We also pushed for the company to embark on

a clear succession plan to ensure a smooth transition to a new CEO,

one capable of achieving Wisetech’s significant potential in the future.

If the company delivers on these steps alongside the clearly articulated

software product development plan, we think shareholders will do very

well in time.

It is early days in this governance reset. But we have been satisfied

with the company’s efforts thus far in responding to this engagement.

This includes announcing the appointment of two new directors to

the Board in late March. If the company continues to improve its

governance structure, our position sizing could be reviewed again in

time.

1

¹ Share price premium to NAV (using the net asset value per share, after expenses, fees and tax, to four decimal places).

1 January 2025 – 31 March 2025

$

0.6 6

Share Price

as at 31 March 2025

QUARTERLY NEWSLETTER

BRM NAVPREMIUM

1

$

0.6 51.5

%

Exercising caution where an investment
thesis has been dented

In a handful of cases, we saw the market react sharply to financial

updates from our companies where management execution lay at

the core of the poor financial results. Insurance construction /support

services company Johns Lyng (-42%), pizza franchise operator

Dominos (-11%) and supermarket operator Woolworths (-2%) all fit

into this category.

As we mentioned in our commentary last month, we like the

scale moat afforded to Woolworths by virtue of being the largest

supermarket operator in Australia. However, management has

consistently underperformed its key competitors in both Australia and

New Zealand for almost two years and so we have sold and exited our

position.

In Johns Lyng’s case, poor execution within its Australian business saw

a key insurance customer re-allocate work to Johns Lyng’s competitors.

This put a deep dent in its profitability which was further exacerbated

by benign weather (hence fewer insurance claims were made). We’re

confident that inclement weather will return, leading to property

damage and a rise in future insurance claims. However, we are less

PERFORMANCE

as at 31 March 2025

3 Months

3 Years

(annualised)

5 Years

(annualised)

Company Performance

Total Shareholder Return(2.1%)(0.7%)+15.7%

Adjusted NAV Return (10.0%)+4.3%+13.8%

Portfolio Performance

Gross Performance Return(9.8%)+6.5%+16.2%

Benchmark Index¹(3.0%)+6.4%+14.2%

1

Benchmark Index: S&P/ASX 200 Index (hedged 70% to NZD)

Non-GAAP Financial Information

Barramundi uses non-GAAP measures, including adjusted net asset value, adjusted NAV return, gross

performance return and total shareholder return. The rationale for using such non-GAAP measures is as

follows:

»adjusted net asset value – the underlying value of the investment portfolio adjusted for capital

allocation decisions after expenses, fees and tax,

»adjusted NAV return – the percentage change in the adjusted NAV value,

»gross performance return – the Manager’s portfolio performance in terms of stock selection and

currency hedging before expenses, fees and tax, and

»total shareholder return – the return combines the share price performance, the warrant price

performance, the net value of converting any warrants into shares, and the dividends paid to

shareholders. It assumes all dividends are reinvested in the company’s dividend reinvestment plan,

and that shareholders exercise their warrants, (if they were in the money), at warrant expiry date..

All references to adjusted net asset value, adjusted NAV return, gross performance return and total

shareholder return in this newsletter are to such non-GAAP measures. The calculations applied to non-

GAAP measures are described in the Barramundi Non-GAAP Financial Information Policy. A copy of the

policy is available at

barramundi.co.nz/about-barramundi/barramundi-policies.

Company% Holdings

Ansell2.1%

ANZ Banking Group2.7%

AUB Group5.6%

Audinate Group1.5%

Brambles5.4%

CAR Group4.9%

Cochlear Limited3.3%

Commonwealth Bank1.9%

Credit Corp3.7%

CSL10.8%

Domino's Pizza2.2%

Fineos Corporation Holdings2.8%

James Hardies Industries Plc2.7%

Johns Lyng Group2.3%

Maas Group Holdings Limited2.2%

Macquarie Group5.1%

National Australia Bank3.3%

NEXTDC2.8%

oOh! Media3.8%

PWR Holdings1.8%

REA Group2.0%

ResMed4.9%

SEEK6.2%

WiseTech Global5.9%

Xero Limited5.3%

Equity Total95.2%

Australian cash1.6%

New Zealand cash2.6%

Total cash4.2%

Forward foreign exchange contracts 0.6%

Total 100.0%

PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS

SUMMARY

as at 31 March 2025

Disclaimer: The information in this newsletter has been prepared as at the date noted on the front page. The information has been prepared as a general summary of the matters covered

only, and it is by necessity brief. The information and opinions are based upon sources which are believed to be reliable, but Barramundi Limited and its officers and directors make no

representation as to its accuracy or completeness. The newsletter is not intended to constitute professional or investment advice and should not be relied upon in making any investment

decisions. Professional financial advice from a financial adviser should be taken before making an investment. To the extent that the newsletter contains data relating to the historical

performance of Barramundi Limited or its portfolio companies, please note that fund performance can and will vary and that future results may have no correlation with results historically

achieved.

Barramundi Limited

Private Bag 93 502, Takapuna, Auckland 0740, New Zealand

Phone: +64 9 489 7074

Email: enquire@barramundi.co.nz | www.barramundi.co.nz

If you would like to receive future

newsletters electronically please email

us at enquire@barramundi.co.nz

SIGNIFICANT RETURNS IMPACTING

THE PORTFOLIO DURING THE

QUARTER IN AUSTRALIAN DOLLARS

JOHNS LYNG

-42

%

WISETECH

-33

%

NEXTDC

-25

%

MAAS GROUP

-24

%

JAMES HARDIE

-23

%

enamoured with how easily an insurer was able to take work away

from Johns Lyng. This suggests its moat may be narrower than we

first thought. It is an issue we’re working through with management

(including monitoring whether Johns Lyng is able to recoup that lost

share – something management remain confident in doing). As such,

we have not added to our position.

Domino’s fits into a similar category. Dominos replaced its CEO in late

2024. The new CEO has taken some significant steps to remedy poor

decisions made in particularly Japan under the prior CEO’s tenure.

These steps, which include shutting down a raft of unprofitable stores

across the Domino’s network, seem sensible. However, we are looking

for more evidence of management execution and an improvement in

overall operations before we are prepared to add to shares that at face

value look relatively cheap.

Robbie Urquhart

Senior Portfolio Manager

Fisher Funds Management Limited

14 April 2025

Data sourced from publicly available filings. Our datasets may not be complete. Automated analysis can produce errors. If you believe any data on this page is incorrect, please contact us at hello@nzxplorer.co.nz. For informational purposes only. Not investment advice.