Livestock Improvement Corporation Limited logo

LIC 2024/25 Annual Report and Climate Statements

Annual Report20 August 2025LICFinancials

Livestock Improvement
Corporation Limited (LIC)

Annual Report

For the year ended 31 May 2025

There's always room for improvement

Contents
Key metrics 4

Financial trends 5

Directors' report 6

Key results and position 8

Our results for the year 8

Our position at year end 9

Our cash flows for the year 10

Changes in our position for the year 11

More details 12

Accounting policies 12

Business analysis 13

Our core assets 14

Our funding 18

Risk and Other assets 19

Tax 20

Other expenses and Other liabilities 21

Transactions with Related Parties, Cash flow

reconciliation and Subsequent events 22

Independent auditor's report 23

Corporate Governance Report 27

Key Metrics
Results at a glance

Underlying

earnings*

R&D expense

Operating

cashflow

Dividend

Revenue

Underlying earnings*

Return on equity

*Non-GAAP financial information

$

21.7

m

$

22.5

m

$

56.4

m

12.22c

$

295.1

m

7.3%

Net profit

after tax (NPAT)

Underlying earnings*

per share

$

30.6

m

15c

From $7.7m

From 10 cents

From $267.3m

From 5.0%

From $13.9m

From $21.2m

From $40.1m

From 5.84 cents

4 Livestock Improvement Corporation Consolidated Annual Report 2024/25

Financial Trends
These charts represent the key financial metrics for LIC to provide a

historical summary of our performance.

* Excludes discontinued operations - the Automation business was divested in June 2021.

** Non-GAAP financial information: excludes bull team and nil paid share revaluations and discontinued operations.

*** The full year dividend declared is paid in the subsequent year, while special dividends are paid within the year.

22.9

26.7

27.4

7.7

30.6

20212022202320242025

Net profit after tax ($m)*

0.16

0.18

0.17

0.10

0.15

20212022202320242025

Underlying Earnings** per share (cents)

22.3

25.7

23.7

13.9

21.7

20212022202320242025

Underlying earnings ($m)**

17.1

18.2

18.6

21.2

22.5

20212022202320242025

R&D expense ($m)*

249.0

263.2

276.5

267.3

295.1

20212022202320242025

Revenue ($m)*

7.6%

8.8%

8.0%

5.0%

7.3%

20212022202320242025

Underlying Earnings** Return on equity %

40.5

57.1

36.8

40.1

56.4

20212022202320242025

Operating cashflow ($m)*

12.51

28.43

16.38

18.84

12.22

Total Dividends (cents per share)***

20212022202320242025

Full year dividend declaredSpecial dividend paid

Livestock Improvement Corporation Consolidated Annual Report 2024/25 5

Directors' Report 2024-25
LIC reports positive full year results with increased dividend for shareholders

The LIC Board announces a positive year-

end financial result as it continues to invest in

innovations for its farmer shareholders. The

co-operative ends the 2024-25 financial year

with a solid profit and Directors have declared a

dividend of 12.22 cents per share.

Summary of financials:

• Total Revenue: $295.1 million, up 10.4% from

$267.3 million last year

• Net Profit After Tax (NPAT): $30.6 million, up

significantly from $7.7 million last year

• Underlying Earnings: $21.7 million, up 56.9%

from $13.9 million last year

• Dividend: $17.4 million – 12.22 cents per share,

representing 80% of Underlying Earnings

• Total assets: $392.0 million, up 9.3% from

$358.6 million last year

• Strong balance sheet with no debt at year-end

The Board is pleased to deliver such a positive

result for farmer owners, especially one which

reflects the hard work that has been put in to

deliver value behind the farm gate. In the past

12 months we have seen Non-Return Rates

(NRR) of our fresh sexed semen lift to within

1% of conventional semen, we have had close

to 1.5 million animals genotyped through our

GeneMark™ Genomics programme and we have

continued to work with our industry partners to

increase the number of integrations available

through our MINDA herd improvement platform.

Whether it’s allowing farmers to generate more

replacement heifers from their top performing

cows, increased certainty around parentage

or reducing time spent on paperwork our co-

operative is focused on putting farmers and their

herds at the heart of everything we do.

Revenue has increased by 10.4% as farmer

owners invested further into their herds and the

co-operative achieved a 14.8% improvement

in underlying earnings, excluding the one-off

negative impacts of the semen quality issue and

the tax deductibility on commercial buildings

change included in last year’s financial result.

6 Livestock Improvement Corporation Consolidated Annual Report 2024/25

Recent years’ investments in digital capability
have resulted in a $4.0m increase in depreciation

and amortisation compared to last year and

operating cashflows increased by $16.3m year on

year on the back of improved underlying earnings

and prudent capital management.

The co-operative continued to invest into

Research and Development, representing a 6.3%

increase on last year at $22.5m.

With robust underlying earnings of 15 cents per

share and a strong cash position, the Board

declares an annual dividend of 12.22 cents per

share, which equates to a fully imputed cash

distribution of $17.4m.

Outlook

The co-operative expects underlying earnings

for 2025-26 to be in the range of $18-22 million,

assuming no significant events, including climate

events, or milk price change takes place between

now and then.

From the 2025-26 year, LIC is planning a multi-

year investment into customer facing systems

and process improvements. This is an important

initiative to replace aging systems and improve

customer experience for our farmers, making the

co-operative easier to work with. This investment

is predominantly into Software as a Service (SaaS)

tools, the costs of which are generally expensed

as incurred, rather than amortised over future

financial periods. For the purpose of determining

the underlying earnings of LIC, this expenditure

will be excluded. Reported Net Profit After

Tax (NPAT) will be negatively impacted by the

implementation costs incurred within a given year.

The co-operative will also continue to invest in

R&D with the next stage of its methane research

due to get underway in the last quarter of 2025.

Livestock Improvement Corporation Consolidated Annual Report 2024/25 7

STATEMENT OF RESULTS FOR THE YEAR
For the year ended 31 May 2025

In thousands of New Zealand dollars

Note20252024

Revenue1295,107 267,288

Purchased materials(46,266)(41,255)

People costs(128,559)(119,758)

Depreciation and amortisation3,4,5(28,051)(24,047)

Other expenses10(65,217)(60,516)

Net finance income/(costs)924 647

Bull team revaluation212,292 (8,768)

Fair value change in Nil Paid Share receivable647 191

Profit/(loss) before tax expense40,277 13,782

Tax expense9(9,634)(6,048)

Profit/(loss) for the year30,643 7,734

Profit per Ordinary Share (excl. treasury stock) $0.22 $0.05

Other comprehensive income

Items that will not be reclassified to profit or loss

Investment revaluations6196 8,805

Land and buildings revaluations3,61,482 3,715

Tax effect of building revaluations9(348)(784)

Items that are or may be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss

Hedge revaluations6(208)(251)

Tax effect of hedge revaluations958 -

Foreign currency translation movements6(48)25

1,132 11,510

Comprehensive income for the year 31,775 19,244

Supplementary non-GAAP note to the results for the year:

Profit/(loss) for the year30,643 7,734

Plus/(less): Bull team revaluation(12,292)8,768

Tax effect on Bull team revaluation3,442 (2,455)

Less: Fair value change in Nil Paid Share receivable(47)(191)

Underlying earnings21,746 13,856

Underlying earnings per Ordinary Share (excl. treasury stock) $0.15 $0.10

Key Results and Position

8 Livestock Improvement Corporation Consolidated Annual Report 2024/25

Key results and position
STATEMENT OF POSITION FOR THE YEAR

As at 31 May 2025

In thousands of New Zealand dollars

Note20252024

Cash and cash equivalents57,127 42,341

Debtors836,705 34,952

Other assets822,774 26,557

Nil Paid Shares receivable6722 972

Bull team2101,164 88,872

Land, buildings and equipment - owned & leased3,5125,845 118,997

Software, goodwill and other intangible assets447,697 45,917

Total assets392,034 358,608

Creditors725,187 23,831

Borrowings7- -

Deferred tax933,323 30,645

Other liabilities1135,152 29,221

Total liabilities93,662 83,697

Net assets298,372 274,911

Share capital676,737 76,737

Retained earnings6172,896 150,567

Other reserves648,739 47,607

Total equity298,372 274,911

Director

Date: 17 July 2025

Director

Date: 17 July 2025

Livestock Improvement Corporation Consolidated Annual Report 2024/25 9

Key results and position
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE YEAR

For the year ended 31 May 2025

In thousands of New Zealand dollars

Note20252024

Customer receipts289,434 264,919

Supplier payments(233,163)(223,940)

Net tax payments(382)(2,189)

Other operating cash flows498 1,262

Net operating cash flows1356,387 40,052

Software development(13,593)(16,097)

Net sales/(purchases) of land, buildings and equipment(14,216)(11,570)

Sale of investments- 19,130

Purchase of investments(8)(100)

Net investment cash flows(27,817)(8,637)

Payment of principal portion of lease liabilities(5,948)(5,408)

Nil Paid Share receipts78 165

Dividends paid(8,095)(38,446)

Net financing cash flows(13,965)(43,689)

Movement in cash for year14,605 (12,274)

Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year42,341 54,596

Currency movement on cash holdings181 19

Cash and cash equivalents at end of the year57,127 42,341

Components of cash and cash equivalents include:

Cash1 1

Bank balances22,126 22,340

Term deposits35,000 20,000

10 Livestock Improvement Corporation Consolidated Annual Report 2024/25

In thousands of New Zealand dollarsNoteShare capitalRetained earningsOther reserves Total equity
Balance at 1 June 202476,737 150,567 47,607 274,911

Profit/(loss) for the year- 30,643 - 30,643

Dividends paid- (8,314)- (8,314)

Hedge revaluations- - (150)(150)

Foreign currency translation movements- - (48)(48)

Investment revaluations- - 196 196

Land and buildings revaluations3,6- - 1,134 1,134

Balance at 31 May 202576,737 172,896 48,739 298,372

Balance at 1 June 202376,737 170,742 50,015 297,494

Profit/(loss) for the year- 7,734 - 7,734

Dividends paid- (41,827)- (41,827)

Hedge revaluations- - (251)(251)

Foreign currency translation movements- - 25 25

Investment revaluations- - 8,805 8,805

Land and buildings revaluations3,6- - 2,931 2,931

Reclassification of investment revaluations on

divestment

6-13,918 (13,918)-

Balance at 31 May 202476,737 150,567 47,607 274,911

Key results and position

STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN POSITION FOR THE YEAR

For the year ended 31 May 2025

Livestock Improvement Corporation Consolidated Annual Report 2024/25 11

More Details
These financial statements set out the performance, position

and cash flows of Livestock Improvement Corporation Limited

("LIC" or the "Company") and its subsidiaries (the "Group") for

the year ended 31 May 2025.


LIC is domiciled in New Zealand, registered under the

Companies Act 1993 and the Co-operative Companies Act

1996, and listed on the Main Board of NZX Ltd. LIC is an FMC

Reporting Entity for the purposes of the Financial Reporting Act

2013 and the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013.

Basis of Preparation

i. Statement of compliance

These financial statements comply with NZ GAAP as

appropriate for Tier 1, for-profit entities, NZIFRS and IFRS.

ii. Basis of measurement

The financial statements have been prepared on a GST

exclusive basis, with the exception of trade receivables and

trade payables, which are reported inclusive of GST. The

financial statements have been prepared on a historical

cost basis, except for the Bull team, Land & Buildings and

Investments, which are all measured at fair value.

The majority of the Group's business does not follow a

clearly identifiable operating cycle, therefore the balance

sheet is presented in order of liquidity as it is more relevant

to the users of the financial statements.

iii. Functional and presentation currency

The functional currency of the Company and the

presentation currency of the financial statements is New

Zealand Dollars ("NZD"), with amounts rounded to the

nearest thousand.

iv. Use of estimates and judgements

The key estimations and judgements made in preparing

these financial statements are the valuation of the Bull

team and the impairment testing of software and other

intangible assets.

v. New or amended standards adopted in current year and

standards issued but not yet effective

Accounting policies have been applied consistently

with prior periods. No new or amended standards were

adopted in the current year that had a significant impact.

NZ IFRS 18 Presentation and Disclosure in Financial

Statements is effective for the year ending 31 May 2028

and will impact the presentation of the Statement of

Results for the Year, with an allocation of income and

expenses between operating, investing and financing

categories, and new sub-totals such as Operating profit.

Financial performance measures used to explain the

Group financial performance in public communications

outside the financial statements will also be required to

be disclosed, and there is enhanced guidance on the

aggregation and disaggregation of information. The Group

is assessing the effect of applying NZ IFRS 18.

vi. Climate risk

Climate change and how farmer shareholders, regulators

and others respond may have an impact on the Group’s

future revenue and the recognised amounts of assets

and liabilities. While the effects of climate change are a

continuing source of uncertainty, climate-related risks have

been assessed as not having a material impact on these

financial statements. Reviews of accounting estimates

(including the valuation of the bull team in Note 2, and

the valuation of land and buildings in Note 3), judgements

and impairment testing assumptions (refer to note 4) have

considered potential future impacts of climate change.

Accounting policies


Accounting entity

12 Livestock Improvement Corporation Consolidated Annual Report 2024/25

(i) Operating segments
The Group operates in four key operating segments, and across four key geographies as set out below. The information below reflects

the information regularly reported to the Chief Executive on those key operating segments:

• NZ market genetics: provides bovine genetic breeding material and related services, predominately to dairy farmers

• Testing: herd testing, on-farm support and DNA and animal health testing services

• Farm software: data recording, tags and farm management information services

• International: provides bovine genetic breeding material and related services to offshore markets

NZ Market Genetics revenue is primarily recognised at a point in time, upon delivery of product to the customer. All other revenue lines

are primarily recognised over time, as the service to the customer is provided.

In thousands of New Zealand dollars

2025

NZ market

genetics

Testing

Farm

software

InternationalOtherEliminationsTotal

External revenue119,933 79,442 61,800 16,037 17,895 - 295,107

Inter-segment revenue- - - - 2,133 (2,133)-

Total revenue119,933 79,442 61,800 16,037 20,028 (2,133)295,107

Depreciation & amortisation(3,476)(10,377)(3,742)(169)(10,287)- (28,051)

Segment gross profit before tax31,138 11,609 33,232 2,963 2,263 - 81,205

Bull team revaluation12,292

Unallocated amounts(53,220)

Profit/(loss) before tax expense40,277

2024

NZ market

genetics

Testing

Farm

software

InternationalOtherEliminationsTotal

External revenue110,784 69,415 56,437 15,050 15,602 - 267,288

Inter-segment revenue- - - - 2,247 (2,247)-

Total revenue110,784 69,415 56,437 15,050 17,849 (2,247)267,288

Depreciation & amortisation(3,465)(9,752)(3,383)(157)(7,290)- (24,047)

Segment gross profit before tax27,966 6,026 31,477 1,901 1,675 - 69,045

Bull team revaluation(8,768)

Unallocated amounts(46,495)

Profit/(loss) before tax expense13,782

The Other operating segment includes research & development and support services. Unallocated amounts include personnel costs,

other expenses and net finance costs. Operating segments have been updated, including comparatives, to more closely align with

LIC's strategy. The changes consolidate LIC's testing services and provide greater insight on the performance of LIC's international

business.

Notes to the Financial Statements

1. Business analysis

Livestock Improvement Corporation Consolidated Annual Report 2024/25 13

Notes to the Financial Statements
1. Business analysis (cont.)

Key drivers of the model:

Forecasted Fonterra Farmgate Milk Price*$9.50$8.85

WACC annualised post tax rate7.25% - 8.74%8.11% - 8.76%

Number of bulls in the team122124

Average % of run-off profile (years 2-5)45%42%

*This is the short term Milk Price outlook.

(ii) Geographic analysis

In thousands of New Zealand dollars

2025

New ZealandAustraliaIrelandUKOtherTotal

Revenues275,211 8,857 4,049 2,961 4,029 295,107

Non-current assets274,888 4,560 1,075 51 - 280,574

2024

Revenues248,420 8,999 3,545 2,337 3,987 267,288

Non-current assets254,087 4,397 1,157 59 - 259,700

2. Bull Team

The bull team is the cornerstone asset of LIC's genetics business. The 826 total bulls (2024: 810 bulls) from which the bull team

are selected are carried at their fair value, which is based on LIC's modelling of future cash flows from the bulls (a "Level 3

valuation"). Changes in their fair value are reported in profit/(loss) for the year. The fair value from the bulls is partly dependent

on the future sales mix of LIC's genetics products, which correlates to movements in the cow population and Farmgate Milk

Price. The valuation is also sensitive to a change in the WACC rate used to discount future cash flows and the run-off profile of

bulls (revenue attributable) that make up the bull team.

Non-current assets includes the Bull team, Land, buildings & equipment, Software, goodwill and other intangible assets, Nil Paid Share

receivable and investments.

The Group's significant subsidiaries are:

• New Zealand: LIC Agritechnology Company Limited (100%)

• Australia: Livestock Improvement Pty Ltd (100%), Beacon Automation Pty Ltd (100%)

• Ireland: LIC Ireland Limited (100%)

• United Kingdom: Livestock Improvement Corporation (UK) Ltd (100%)

The Group is not dependent on any one major customer in any of its reportable segments. New Zealand revenues include government

grants and R&D tax incentive income of $7.685 million (2024: $8.179 million).

In thousands of New Zealand dollars

20252024

Opening balance88,872 97,640

Bull team revaluation12,292(8,768)

Closing balance101,164 88,872

The impact on the fair value of a change to these key drivers is summarised below:

Change in the bull run-off profile $8.4m - average of a 5% shift across years 2-5

Reduction of 5% in sales demand (due to unforeseen reduction in milk price,

cow population or other significant events)

$7.4m$3.1m

WACC moves 100 basis points$3.0m$2.5m

14 Livestock Improvement Corporation Consolidated Annual Report 2024/25

In thousands of New Zealand dollars
20252024

Land BuildingsEquipmentTotalLand BuildingsEquipmentTotal

Opening balance38,733 55,701 24,563 118,997 37,990 51,500 24,057 113,547

Additions- 5,133 9,532 14,665 - 4,852 7,331 12,183

Disposals- (451)(73)(524)- -(126)(126)

Depreciation- (3,362)(7,158)(10,520)- (3,048)(6,906)(9,954)

Revaluation360 1,232 - 1,592 743 2,650 - 3,393

Foreign exchange- - 18 18 - -(2)(2)

Right of use leased assets

movement - note 5

- 2,426 (809)1,617 - (253)209 (44)

Closing balance39,093 60,679 26,073 125,845 38,733 55,701 24,563 118,997

Value if carried at cost11,726 24,456 N/A 11,726 23,135 N/A

Estimated useful lives N/A 10-60 years 3-10 years N/A 10-60 years 3-10 years

Land and buildings are carried at fair value, determined by an independent valuer as at April 2025 (most recent full valuation as at

April 2024). Fair value is based on comparable sales for land and based on depreciated replacement cost for buildings. Revaluations

are primarily reflected in the revaluation reserve. Equipment includes plant, vehicles, furniture and fittings and IT hardware, and is

carried at depreciated cost. Buildings and equipment are depreciated on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives, and

are reviewed annually for any indications of impairment.

4. Software and other intangibles

(i) Software and other intangible asset balances

Software development expenditure is capitalised only where costs are directly attributable, and once the product or process is

commercially feasible, the benefits are probable, and the Group intends to sell or use the completed software.

Software assets are amortised over their useful lives of up to seven years on a straight line basis, and are reviewed annually for

indicators of impairment.

Intellectual property (IP) assets are amortised over their estimated useful lives of up to 13 years.

The genetic data in the LIC database increases with each successive generation. Both goodwill and the LIC database have indefinite

useful lives. They are recognised at cost and are not amortised, are allocated to a cash generating unit ("CGU") and tested for

impairment annually.

Notes to the Financial Statements

3. Land, buildings and equipment

In thousands of New Zealand dollars

20252024

Software

& IP

GoodwillDatabaseTotal

Software

& IP

GoodwillDatabaseTotal

Opening balance33,046 2,371 10,500 45,917 25,798 2,363 10,500 38,661

Additions13,808 - - 13,808 16,081 - - 16,081

Disposals/impairment(183)- - (183)- - - -

Amortisation(11,813)- - (11,813)(8,842)- - (8,842)

Foreign exchange(20)(12)- (32)9 8 - 17

Closing balance34,838 2,359 10,500 47,697 33,046 2,371 10,500 45,917

Livestock Improvement Corporation Consolidated Annual Report 2024/25 15

Notes to the Financial Statements
4. Software and other intangibles (cont.)

In thousands of New Zealand dollars

20252024

NZ Market Genetics,

Farm software and

Testing CGU

International

CGU

Total

NZ Market Genetics,

Farm software and

Testing CGU

International

CGU

Total

LIC database10,500 - 10,500 10,500 - 10,500

Goodwill- 2,359 2,359 - 2,371 2,371

Total10,500 2,359 12,859 10,500 2,371 12,871

At reporting date, software includes $8.024 million (2024: $11.595 million) of work in progress, which is not being amortised until it is

ready for use.

(ii) Impairment testing of intangible assets

Allocation of Goodwill and the LIC Database to CGUs:

International CGU relates to two separate CGU's - LIC Ireland and Beacon Automation. The LIC database and each of the

International CGU Goodwill recoverable amounts have been separately tested using a value in use method.

For the LIC database and International CGU Goodwill, a discounted cash flow model is used for impairment testing based on expected

results and capital expenditure from the current year forecast, Board approved budgets and a projection for further periods using

a terminal growth rate. A five year cash flow projection period is used. The terminal growth rate used is 1.5% (2024: 1.5%) for the LIC

database and International CGU Goodwill. The discount rate applied is reviewed and updated annually for movements in published

Treasury risk-free rates and is 8.5-10.6% for the LIC database and International CGU Goodwill (2024: 8.7-10.9% for the LIC database

and International CGU Goodwill).

(i) LIC as a lessee

The Group has lease contracts for buildings, equipment and vehicles used in its operations. The Group’s obligations under its leases

are secured by the lessor’s title to the leased assets. Several lease contracts include extension and termination options. The Group's

discount or incremental borrowing rate applicable to leases is 5.2% (2024: 5.1%).

The Group also has certain leases of machinery with lease terms of 12-months or less and leases of office equipment with low value.

The Group applies the ‘short-term lease’ and ‘lease of low-value assets’ recognition exemptions for these leases.

5. Leases

16 Livestock Improvement Corporation Consolidated Annual Report 2024/25

Notes to the Financial Statements
5. Leases (cont.)

Lease liabilities

Set out below are the carrying amounts of lease liabilities recognised at 31 May (included in Other liabilities):

The Group had total non-variable cash outflows for leases of $6.782 million in 2025 ($6.086 million in 2024).

(iii) Lease related amounts in the Statement of Results

(ii) Lease balances in the Statement of Position

Right of use assets

Set out below are the carrying amounts of right-of-use assets recognised (under Land, buildings and equipment) and the movements

during the period:

In thousands of New Zealand dollars

20252024

Buildings EquipmentVehiclesTotalBuildings EquipmentVehiclesTotal

Opening Balance12,399 385 7,327 20,111 12,652 180 7,323 20,155

Depreciation(1,591)(166)(3,961)(5,718)(1,471)(142)(3,638)(5,251)

Additions4,010 337 3,216 7,563 1,420 347 3,871 5,638

Disposals/modifications7 (139)(96)(228)(202)- (229)(431)

Closing balance14,825 417 6,486 21,728 12,399 385 7,327 20,111

Lease terms 3-28 years 1-9 years 1-7 years 2-28 years 2-5 years 2-8 years

In thousands of New Zealand dollars

20252024

Buildings EquipmentVehiclesTotalBuildings EquipmentVehiclesTotal

Within 1 year1,490 164 3,390 5,044 1,341 72 3,549 4,962

Between 1 to 5 years6,017 262 3,403 9,682 4,612 161 4,301 9,074

More than 5 years8,587 - - 8,587 7,662 - - 7,662

Closing balance16,094 426 6,793 23,313 13,615 233 7,850 21,698

In thousands of New Zealand dollars

20252024

Buildings EquipmentVehiclesTotalBuildings EquipmentVehiclesTotal

Depreciation1,591 166 3,961 5,718 1,471 142 3,638 5,251

Interest expense636 24 489 1,149 621 17 479 1,117

Variable lease payments- - 852 852 - - 980 980

Short-term and low-value leases- 7 - 7 - 1 - 1

Total amount 2,227 197 5,302 7,726 2,092 160 5,097 7,349

Livestock Improvement Corporation Consolidated Annual Report 2024/25 17

Notes to the Financial Statements
6. Funding

The Group's funding comes from Share Capital, Retained earnings, Other reserves and Borrowings.

(i) Ordinary Shares

All Ordinary Shares have voting rights and the right to receive dividends based on the profits of the Company.

At reporting date there were 142,344,836 Ordinary Shares on issue, excluding 5,337,584 shares held as treasury stock

(2024: 142,344,836 Ordinary Shares, excluding 5,337,584 shares held as treasury stock).

(ii) Nil Paid Shares

Ordinary Shares includes both fully paid shares and shares on which full payment has not yet been made. These Nil Paid Shares must

be paid up over time by Shareholders via a combination of dividend payments forgone, voluntary payments and payments made

on exit as a Shareholder. At year-end the outstanding amount on Nil Paid Shares has been recorded in the Statement of Position

as a receivable, valued at $0.722 million (2024: $0.972 million) using a discounted cash flow model. The model uses assumptions on

expected future dividends, voluntary and compulsory payments and applies a discount rate of 6.5% (2024: 8.6%).

(iv) Market capitalisation

As at 31 May 2025, the Group's market capitalisation of $134.501 million (2024: $172.365 million) was below the carrying value of net

assets of $298.372 million (2024: $274.911 million). The share price is not considered an accurate reflection of the fair value of the

Group's net assets for a number of reasons, including the nature of the co-operative and its restricted capital structure. Accounting

standards consider market capitalisation below net assets to be an indicator of possible impairment and an impairment test has

therefore been performed. The Group recoverable amount has been determined using a value in use method as with the impairment

tests in Note 4, a discounted cash flow model has been used based on Board approved budgets and a projection covering five

years using a terminal growth rate of 1.5% (2024: 1.5%). The discount rate applied is reviewed and updated annually for movements

in published Treasury risk-free rates and is 8.5% (2024: 8.7%). The calculated recoverable amount of the group was higher than the

carrying value of the net assets, and therefore no impairment was recognised.

(v) Bank debt

Bank loans for seasonal funding requirements are secured by a Negative Pledge granted to Westpac and Rabobank over certain

New Zealand-based subsidiaries.

(iii) Other reserves and equity



In thousands of New Zealand dollars

Hedge

revaluation

reserve

Investment

revaluation

reserve

Land & building

revaluation reserve

Foreign currency

translation reserve

Other

reserves

Balance at 1 June 2024(80)1,456 46,291 (60)47,607

Revaluations(150)196 1,134 (48)1,132

Balance at 31 May 2025(230)1,652 47,425 (108)48,739

Balance at 1 June 2023171 6,569 43,360 (85)50,015

Revaluations(251)8,805 2,931 25 11,510

Reclassification of investment revaluations

on divestment*

- (13,918)- - (13,918)

Balance at 31 May 2024(80)1,456 46,291 (60)47,607

*In the 2024 year, LIC sold it's shareholding in National Milk Records Plc for £9.019 million (NZD $18.963 million). Associated accumulated

revaluations were reclassified from Other reserves to Retained earnings on divestment.

18 Livestock Improvement Corporation Consolidated Annual Report 2024/25

Notes to the Financial Statements
7. Liquidity and interest rate risk

(i) Debtors

Bad debts of $0.053 million have been expensed during the year (2024: $0.020 million), and 91.3% of trade receivables are not past

due (2024: 87.8%).

(ii) Interest rate risk

Interest rate risk is the risk that changes in interest rates will impact the Group's results or position. The weighted average effective

interest rate paid on borrowings in 2025 was 6.5% (2024: 7.3%). A 1.0% increase in interest rates would increase interest paid and

reduce profit after tax by approximately $0.018 million (2024: $0.001 million).

(i) Liquidity risk

Liquidity risk is the risk of having insufficient liquid assets to pay the Group's debts as they fall due. The Group manages the risk

by monitoring forecast cash flows and holding sufficient bank facilities to meet the Group's needs. The contractual maturity of the

Group's funding is shown below.

The Group has bank funding facilities in place until February 2026 and expects to be able to meet any obligations which fall due.

In thousands of New Zealand dollars

20252024

Demand to

6 months

6 months

to 1 year

1 year

plus

Total

Demand to

6 months

6 months

to 1 year

1 year

plus

Total

Creditors25,187 - - 25,187 23,831 - - 23,831

Total25,187 - - 25,187 23,831 - - 23,831

(ii) Other assets

Inventories utilised and expensed during the period amounted to $31.613 million (2024: $29.176 million). Net inventories written

on in 2025 totalled $0.201 million (2024: $0.095 million written off), and comprised of $0.396 million of stock written off and

$0.597 million of previously written off stock written back on into inventory.

Investments are non-current assets and are held at fair values based on available share prices and other market information.

Gains and losses are recognised in other comprehensive income, as investments are not held for trading. Investments include

Figured Limited $3.358 million (2024: $3.358 million).

In thousands of New Zealand dollars

20252024

Inventories16,703 20,808

Investments5,145 4,941

Other livestock926 808

Total22,774 26,557

8. Debtors and other assets

Livestock Improvement Corporation Consolidated Annual Report 2024/25 19

Notes to the Financial Statements
9. Tax

Tax expense is recognised for items arising this year that are either taxable this year (current tax) or in other years (deferred tax).

The main items giving rise to deferred tax are revaluations of the Bull team and Buildings.

(i) Tax expense

In March 2024, legislation was enacted which removed the deductibility of depreciation on long-life commercial buildings for tax

purposes.  At 31 May 2024, the impact of this change decreased the tax base for these assets, giving rise to an increased temporary

difference between the carrying cost and tax base and resulted in a one-off, non-cash, increase in both deferred tax liability and tax

expense of $3.643 million.

Given the Group's current turnover, and the lack of significant operations in foreign jurisdictions with tax rates below 15%, it does not

expect to be impacted by Pillar II tax reforms and the move towards global minimum tax rates of 15%.

LIC claims credits under the R&D Tax Incentive scheme. Claims include eligible core research expenditure and technology

development, as well as expenses that support R&D, and the credits are recorded as non-taxable revenue.

In thousands of New Zealand dollars

20252024

Profit/(loss) for the year30,6437,734

Tax expense9,634 6,048

Profit/(loss) before tax expense40,277 13,782

Tax at 28% NZ company tax rate11,278 3,859

Effect of overseas income(93)(34)

Non-deductible items(1,449)(521)

Adjustments from prior periods(102)(899)

Impact of changes to building depreciation- 3,643

Tax expense9,634 6,048

Current tax expense7,2463,919

Deferred tax expense2,388 2,129

Imputation credits available13,1179,468

In thousands of

New Zealand dollars

As at 31 May

2025

Through

Profit/(loss)

Through

Other reserves

As at 31 May

2024

Through

Profit/(loss)

Through

Other reserves

As at

31 May 2023

Bull team & livestock27,741 3,320 - 24,421 (2,414)- 26,835

Buildings & equipment

6,433 235 348 5,850 3,304 784 1,762

Intangible assets

2,940 - - 2,940 1,480 - 1,460

Other

(3,791)(1,167)(58)(2,566)(241)- (2,325)

Total33,323 2,388 290 30,645 2,129 784 27,732

(ii) Deferred tax liability

20 Livestock Improvement Corporation Consolidated Annual Report 2024/25

Notes to the Financial Statements
10. Other expenses

Other expenses includes the following amounts paid to the Group's auditors, KPMG:

The provision for sire proving rebate represents a rolling three years of expected rebate payments, with between $0.8 - $1.0 million

due to be paid in each of the next three years, discounted to 31 May 2025.

In thousands of New Zealand dollars

20252024

Provisions for employee entitlements10,194 7,596

Provision for sire proving rebate2,441 2,522

Derivatives used for hedging295 87

Provision for tax(1,712)(3,259)

Lease liabilities - current5,044 4,962

Lease liabilities - non-current18,269 16,736

Other621 577

Total35,15229,221

11. Other liabilities

In thousands of New Zealand dollars

20252024

Research & Development expenses22,549 21,215

As part of business activities, LIC incurs research and development expenses while working on a number of projects.

*Agreed upon procedures relate to the R&D Tax Incentive scheme and disclosure of historical financial data in the sustainability report.

In thousands of New Zealand dollars20252024

Audit and audit related services

Audit of the financial statements232 222

Agreed upon procedures*

26 24

GHG scope 1 & 2 assurance as it relates to year end

25 -

Total audit and audit related services283246

Tax - compliance services78-

Total361 246

Livestock Improvement Corporation Consolidated Annual Report 2024/25 21

In thousands of New Zealand dollars
20252024

Remuneration of key Management and Directors 4,622 4,960

Sale of goods and services to key Management and Directors996 468

Purchases of goods and services from key Management and Directors- 3

Notes to the Financial Statements

12. Transactions with Related Parties - Directors and Management

After 31 May 2025, a dividend of 12.22 cents per Ordinary Share was proposed by the Directors in relation to the 2025 year, or $17.397

million (2024: 5.84 cents per Ordinary Share, or $8.314 million).

14. Subsequent events

Directors of the Company and their related entities hold 617,474 Ordinary Shares, representing 0.42% of shares on issue (2024: 378,001

Ordinary Shares, representing 0.26%).

There are no loans or deposits with related entities outside of the consolidated Group.

The Group has had the following short-term transactions with key Management and Directors during the year:

13. Reconciliation of the Profit/(loss) for the year to Net operating cash flows

In thousands of New Zealand dollars

20252024

Profit/(loss) for the year30,643 7,734

Adjusted for:

Depreciation and amortisation on all assets28,051 24,047

Bull team revaluation(12,292)8,768

Deferred tax expense2,388 2,129

Working capital movements and other non-cash items7,597 (2,626)

Net operating cash flows56,387 40,052

22 Livestock Improvement Corporation Consolidated Annual Report 2024/25

© 2025 KPMG, a New Zealand Partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organization of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited,
a private English company limited by guarantee. All rights reserved.

Document classification: KPMG Public

Independent Auditor’s Report

To the shareholders of Livestock Improvement Corporation Limited

Report on the audit of the consolidated financial statements

Opinion

We have audited the accompanying consolidated

financial statements which comprise:

­ the consolidated statement of financial

position as at 31 May 2025;

­ the consolidated statements of results,

changes in position and cash flows for the

year then ended; and

­ notes, including material accounting policy

information and other explanatory information.

In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated

financial statements of Livestock Improvement

Corporation Limited (the Company) and its

subsidiaries (the Group) on pages 8 to 22 present

fairly in all material respects:

­ the Group’s financial position as at 31 May

2025 and its financial performance and cash

flows for the year ended on that date;

­ In accordance with New Zealand Equivalents

to International Financial Reporting

Standards (NZ IFRS) issued by the New

Zealand Accounting Standards Board and

the International Financial Reporting

Standards issued by the International

Accounting Standards Board.

Basis for opinion

We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (New Zealand) (ISAs (NZ)). We

believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.

We are independent of Livestock Improvement Corporation Limited in accordance wit h Professional and Ethical

Standard 1 International Code of E thics for Assurance Practitioners (Including International Independence

Standards) (New Zealand) issued by the New Zealand Auditi ng and Assurance Standards Boar d and the

International Ethics Standards Boar d for Accountants’ International Cod e of E thics for Professional Accountants

(including International Independence Standards) (IESBA Code), as applicable to audits of financial statements

of p ublic interest entities. We hav e als o fulfill ed our other ethical responsibilities in accordance wit h Professional

and Ethical Standards 1 and the IESBA Code.

Our responsibilities under ISAs (NZ) are further described in the Auditor’s responsibilities for t he audit of the

consolidated financial statements section of our report.

Our firm has provided other services to the Group in relation to assurance services, agreed upon procedures

engagements, and taxation compliance services for the R&D tax incentive scheme. Subject to certain

restrictions, partners and employees of our firm may also deal with the G roup on normal terms within the

ordinary course of t rading activities of t he business of t he Group. These matters have not impaired our

independence as auditor of t he Group. The firm has no other relationship with, or interest in, t he Group.

Livestock Improvement Corporation Financial Statements 2024/25 23

Independent Auditor's Report

Livestock Improvement Corporation Consolidated Annual Report 2024/25 23

Materiality
The scope of our audit was influenced by our application of materiality. Materiality helped us to determine the

nature, timing and extent of our audit procedures and to evaluate the effect of misstatements, both individually

and on the consolidated financial statements as a whole. The materiality for the consolidated financial statements

as a whole was set at $1,310,000 determined with reference to a benchmark of the Group’s profit/(loss) for the

year before tax (excluding bull team revaluation movements). We chose the benchmark because, in our view,

this is a key measure of the Group’s performance.

Key audit matters

Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgement, were of most significance in our audit of

the consolidated financial statements in the current period. We summarise below those matters and our key audit

procedures to address those matters in order that the shareholders as a body may better understand the process

by which we arrived at our audit opinion.

Our procedures were undertaken in the context of and solely for the purpose of our audit opinion on the

consolidated financial statements as a whole and we do not express discrete opinions on separate elements of

the consolidated financial statements.

The key audit matter How the matter was addressed in our

audit

Valuation of the Bull Team

Refer to Note 2 to the Financial Statements.

Determining the valuation of the bull team,

which is the core asset to both the domestic

and international genetics operations of the

Group, is a highly judgemental and complex

area. Management prepares a model that

projects the number and types of straws that

the current team can produce and will be sold

over the useful life of the bulls. The valuation

model factors the cost of rearing, animal and

farm management costs, and forecasts of

processing costs to make sales. The calculated

surplus is discounted to reflect the time value of

money.

Our audit procedures included challenge of management’s

significant assumptions such as:

‒ Projected sales volumes and pricing;

‒ Discount rates applied; and

‒ Runoff Profile of the bulls.

We compared sales and costs growth, and inflation rates to

historical data and published market forecast data where

available.

We utilised our valuation specialists to review market and

industry data to assess management’s discount rate applied

to the valuation model.

We assessed the runoff profile of the bulls against historical

data and found the inputs to be comparable.

We c onsidered the adequacy of the related financial

statement disclosures.

We had no matters to report as a result of our procedures.

Carrying Value of Intangible Assets

Refer to Note 4 to the Financial Statements

The Group has a Database intangible asset of

$10.5m with an indefinite useful life.

The significant cash generating unit (CGU)

holding this asset is tested twice a year for

We challenged management on the reasonableness of the

assumptions included in the cashflow forecast models, with

particular attention paid to the following:

‒ Assessing management’s future sales and growth

assumptions compared to external market and industry

data and historical performance of the CGU and the

24Livestock Improvement Corporation Financial Statements 2024/25

24 Livestock Improvement Corporation Consolidated Annual Report 2024/25

The key audit matter How the matter was addressed in our
audit

impairment using a discounted cashflow model

to determine the recoverable amount.

The market capitalisation deficit that exists at

balance date is an indicator of impairment at a

Group level and has therefore been tested for

impairment using a discounted cashflow model

to determine the recoverable amount of the

Group.

The annual impairment tests performed by the

Group were significant to our audit due to the

magnitude of the intangible assets and because

the discounted cashflow models involve

judgement about the future performance of the

CGU and the Group, including considering

future economic and market conditions.

Group. We used our own valuation specialists to assist

us with the consideration of the discount rates;

‒ Comparing management’s previous forecasts to actual

results achieved in the CGU and the Group; and

‒ Performing sensitivity analysis around the key

assumptions used in the model.

We had no matters to report as a result of our procedures.

Other information

The directors, on behalf of the Group, are responsible for the other information. The other information comprises

the Key Metrics, Financial Trends and the Directors Report (but does not include the consolidated financial

statements and our auditor’s report thereon), which we obtained prior to the date of this auditor’s report, and the

Annual Report, which is expected to be made available to us after that date.

Our opinion on the consolidated financial statements does not cover any other information and we do not

express any form of assurance conclusion thereon.

In connection with our audit of the consolidated financial statements our responsibility is to read the other

information and in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the

consolidated financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit or otherwise appears materially

misstated.

If, based on the work we have performed on the other information that we obtained prior to the date of this

auditor’s report, we conclude there is a material misstatement of this other information, we are required to report

that fact. We have nothing to report in this regard.

When we read the Annual Report , if we conclude that there is a material misstatement therein, we are required to

communicate the matter to directors.

Use of this independent auditor’s report

This independent auditor’s report is made solely to the shareholders. Our audit work has been undertaken so

that we might state to the shareholders those matters we are required to state to them in the independent

auditor’s report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, none of KPMG, any entities

directly or indirectly controlled by KPMG, or any of their respective members or employees, accept or assume

any responsibility and deny all liability to anyone other than the shareholders for our audit work, this independent

auditor’s report, or any of the opinions we have formed.

Livestock Improvement Corporation Financial Statements 2024/25 25

Livestock Improvement Corporation Consolidated Annual Report 2024/25 25

Responsibilities of directors for the consolidated financial
statements

The directors, on behalf of the Group, are responsible for:

— the preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with NZ

IFRS issued by the New Zealand Accounting Standards Board and the International Financial Reporting

Standards issued by the International Accounting Standards Board;

— i mplementing the necessary internal control to enable the preparation of a consolidated set of financial

statements that is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; and

— assessing the ability of the Group to continue as a going concern. This includes disclosing, as

applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless

they either intend to liquidate or to cease operations or have no realistic alternative but to do so.

Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the consolidated

financial statements

Our objective is:

— to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from

material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; and

— to issue an independent auditor’s report that includes our opinion.

Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but it is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in

accordance with ISAs NZ will always detect a material misstatement when it exists.

Misstatements can arise from fraud or error. They are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they

could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of the

consolidated financial statements.

A further description of our responsibilities for the audit of the consolidated financial statements is located at the

External Reporting Board (XRB) website at:

https://www.xrb.govt.nz/standards/assurance-standards/auditors-responsibilities/audit-report-1-1/

This description forms part of our independent auditor’s report.

The engagement partner on the audit resulting in this independent auditor’s report is David Gates.

For and on behalf of:

KPMG

Wellington

17 Jul y 2025

26Livestock Improvement Corporation Financial Statements 2024/25

26 Livestock Improvement Corporation Consolidated Annual Report 2024/25

Corporate Governance Report
Corporate Governance Statement

Livestock Improvement Corporation (“LIC” or

the “Company”) is a New Zealand Co-operative

Company, owned by New Zealand dairy farmers.

Its shares are quoted on the Main Board of the

New Zealand Stock Exchange (NZX) and it is a

Climate Reporting Entity (as defined under The

Financial Sector (Climate-related Disclosures and

Other Matters) Amendment Act 2021). LIC’s Climate

Statements for the year ended 31 May 2025 can be

accessed on LIC’s website at:

lic.co.nz/about/environment-and-sustainability/

climate-disclosure-reporting/

In this section of the Annual Report we report

against the Principles and Recommendations

of the NZX Corporate Governance Code

dated 31 January 2025 (the NZX Code) and the

extent that LIC has followed the NZX Code’s

recommendations. LIC has a high degree of

compliance with the NZX Code. This statement is

current to 31 May 2025 and has been approved by

the Directors of LIC.

LIC is primarily involved in the development,

production and marketing of artificial breeding,

genetics, farm software, diagnostic, animal health

and herd testing services in the New Zealand dairy

sector, as well as research relating to dairy herd

improvement.

On LIC's website (lic.co.nz/shareholders/

corporategovernance) you will find the following

corporate governance documents:

• Constitution of Livestock Improvement

Corporation Limited

Charters

• LIC Board Charter

• Audit, Finance & Risk Committee Charter

• People and Culture Committee Charter

• Disclosure Committee Charter

• LIC Shareholder Reference Group, Board and

Management Engagement Charter

Other Corporate Governance Documents

• Code of Conduct and Ethics

• Share Trading & Continuous Disclosure Policy

• Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Policy

• Dividend Policy

• External Auditor Independence Policy

• Honoraria Committee Terms of Reference

• Terms of Reference Shareholder

Reference Group

• Share Trading and Disclosure Policy

Our latest Sustainability Report can also be

accessed on LIC’s website at:

lic.co.nz/about/environment-and-sustainability/

sustainability

Livestock Improvement Corporation Consolidated Annual Report 2024/25 27

Co-operative Principles
LIC’s co-operative principles are set out in its

Constitution and are:

a) The Company will remain a Co-operative

Company;

b) The Company is “User Controlled” meaning

that eligible Users of the Company’s qualifying

products and services hold 60% or more of its

voting rights;

c) Core products and services are made

available to all Shareholders at fair

commercial prices;

d) Products and services which benefit

Shareholders, and which otherwise might not

be made available, are developed and made

available to Shareholders, provided that the

company receives a commercial return; and

e) Shareholders co-operate with the Company

and each other, including the sharing of

information to promote their common

interests.

NZX Code Principle 1, Ethical standards: Directors should set high standards of

ethical behaviour, model this behaviour and hold management accountable for these

standards being followed throughout the organisation.

Code of Conduct and Ethics

LIC's Code of Conduct and Ethics (the Code)

sets out the ethical and behaviour standards

expected of Directors, members of the Shareholder

Reference Group (SRG), employees and contractors

of LIC. The Code is reviewed biennially (or as

required) to keep it up to date with employee,

shareholder and other stakeholder expectations.

New Directors and employees receive training

on the Code as part of their induction process.

Directors and employees are also expected to

uphold LIC's values of integrity, innovation, being

in-tune with our farmers, passion and spirit of

cooperation.

Avoiding conflicts of interest

The Code of Conduct and Ethics includes direction

on disclosing and managing conflicts of interest.

The Board updates changes in interests and any

potential conflicts at each meeting. LIC’s General

Counsel holds a Directors' interests register and

the Board reviews the register at each meeting.

The register records relevant transactions and

disclosures of interests. The Directors’ interests are

set out on page 45.

Whistleblowing

The Code of Conduct and Ethics and the

Company's Employment Relations Policy, which are

available to employees on LIC's intranet, include

guidance on specific action to be taken by a

person who suspects a serious wrongdoing.

Trading in securities

The Company has a Share Trading and Disclosure

Policy for Directors, members of the SRG, Restricted

Persons and other employees wanting to deal in

the securities of the Company.

The Policy outlines:

• when Directors, members of the SRG,

Restricted Persons and other employees

of the Company may deal in the shares of

the Company;

• procedures to reduce the risk of insider

trading; and

• disclosure requirements.

The Policy records the Company's procedures for

compliance with the Financial Markets Conduct

Act 2013 (FMC Act), the NZX Listing Rules and other

relevant legislation/regulation for the trading and

disclosure of trading in the shares of the Company

and details the exemption granted by the Financial

Markets Authority from certain provisions of

the FMC Act.

28 Livestock Improvement Corporation Consolidated Annual Report 2024/25

The exemption ensures that LIC Directors and
employees can comply with the Company’s

constitutional and co-operative requirements and

the Rules of its Employee Share Scheme without

technically infringing the insider trading provisions

of the FMC Act.

The Policy aims to protect Directors, members of

the SRG, Restricted Persons and employees, as well

as the Company and the Company's Shareholders,

against acts of insider trading that could

disadvantage holders of the Company's shares.

An Elected Director must hold the minimum

shareholding requirement and can hold additional

shares in accordance with the Company’s

Constitution.

NZX Code Principle 2, Board composition and performance: To ensure an effective

board, there should be a balance of independence, skills, knowledge, experience and

perspectives.

Role of the Board

Legislation, the NZX Listing Rules and the

Company’s Constitution establish the Board's

responsibilities and include provisions for how the

Company will operate. The structure of the Board

and its governance arrangements are set out in

the Company's Constitution and in the Board's

written Charter, which outlines and distinguishes

the Board and Management's respective roles and

responsibilities. The Board is responsible for the

direction and control of LIC's activities. It is also

committed to the guiding values of the Company.

Board responsibilities

The Board is responsible for setting the strategy

of LIC and monitoring delivery against that

strategy, recognising the Company’s economic,

environmental and social responsibilities.

LIC’s strategy is to help farmers breed better cows

for their future herd now, using the best tools,

insights and genetics by focussing on the following:

What's the

herd of the

future?

How we'll

breed it

faster

The role of

our people

Working with farmers to breed for that future herd now - using the best tools,

insights and genetics we can offer

Breeding

better cows

faster with:

Why this

matters

High-preforming herds

through world-class breeding

programmes

Smarter tools that connect data,

insights and systems farmers use

A generational co-operative

that's easy to work with

Our Strategy

Customer

experience

that makes LIC

easy to deal with

Genetics

that continue

to deliver value

on farm

Testing

to predict

performance and

health issues

Farm software

to make herd

and breeding

decisions easier

International

markets

to strengthen our

breeding scheme

With world leading herd improvement

Highly efficient,

producing more

from less

Aligned with the

needs of processors

and global markets

Lower-emitting and

environmentally

fit-for-purpose

Livestock Improvement Corporation Consolidated Annual Report 2024/25 29

The Board is also responsible for approval of
significant expenditures, policy determination,

selection of Appointed Directors, oversight of risk

(including climate-related risks and opportunities

and setting risk appetite for all risk categories) and

stewardship of the Company's assets.

Management is responsible for implementing

the strategic objectives, operating within the risk

appetite set by the Board, and for all other day-to-

day running of the Company. The Board delegates

the day-to-day leadership and management of

the Company to the Chief Executive (CE). The

delegations are set out in the Board Charter and in

a Delegated Authorities Policy, which also sets out

authority levels for types of commitments that the

Company's management can make. A copy of the

Board Charter is available on LIC's website.

Notwithstanding the responsibilities of the Board,

the Board and Shareholders will not, except with

the written consent of the Minister for Primary

Industries, or other relevant Minister, exercise any

of their rights, directions and powers under, or

alter the Constitution so as to cause or permit the

Company to cease to be a co-operative supplying

goods and services to Shareholders.

Board composition

The Board is comprised of six Elected and four

Appointed Directors. The current Board of Directors

is made up as follows:

• Elected Directors: Corrigan Sowman (Chair),

Ben Dickie, Duncan Coull, Tony Coltman,

Victoria Trayner and Mike O’Connor.

• Appointed Directors: Tim Gibson, Sophie

Haslem, Hamish Rumbold and Blair O’Keeffe.

Information about each Director, including

their independence, ownership interests and

attendance at board meetings, is included in this

section. A profile of each Director's experience,

including the length of their service, can be found

on the LIC website. See also page 36 for further

information about the Company’s Diversity, Equity

and Inclusion policy.

30 Livestock Improvement Corporation Consolidated Annual Report 2024/25

Nomination, election and appointment of Directors
The nomination, election and appointment of

Directors to the Board of LIC is also governed by

the LIC Constitution. The relevant NZX Rulings and

waivers to the NZX Listing Rules are set out on

pages 51 and 52.

Elected Directors are nominated and elected

by Shareholders within the region each Director

represents (two regions in total). Once elected they

will hold office for a period of approximately three

years. The term of that director’s tenure will be in

accordance with the Rotation Schedule.

All recommendations and deliberations on the

selection of Appointed Directors are undertaken by

the full Board. Appointed Directors hold office for

approximately three years, unless a shorter term is

approved by Shareholders.

A retiring Director is eligible for re-election or

re-appointment as a Director of the Company. All

Directors enter into written agreements setting out

the terms of their engagement.

In relation to the nomination and appointment of

Directors, appropriate checks are undertaken by

an external party, Propero Consulting Limited. The

process includes the provision of key information

about candidates to Shareholders and/or the

Board, such as relevant skills, experience and

directorships and any material adverse information

of which the Company has become aware.

In this year’s Director elections, North Island

Director Ben Dickie and South Island Director

Corrigan Sowman are due to retire by rotation

at the Annual Meeting. Ben Dickie has decided,

after eight years on the LIC Board, not to seek

re-election. Ben Dickie will be replaced by

a nominated Shareholder that is elected by

Shareholders. The Election will be held at the 2025

Annual Meeting.

With no nominations received other than Corrigan

Sowman for the South Island Region, Corrigan

Sowman is deemed appointed as a Director for

another term from the 2025 Annual Meeting.

Hamish Rumbold was appointed as a Director on

28 January 2025.

Appointed Director Tim Gibson is due to retire by

rotation at this year’s Annual Meeting. After eight

years on the LIC Board, he has decided not to seek

re-appointment.

On 7 July 2025 the Board appointed Blair O’Keeffe

to replace Tim Gibson.

Meetings

The Board met ten times in 2024/25 with three

additional strategy days.

Livestock Improvement Corporation Consolidated Annual Report 2024/25 31

Director training
Directors each undertake appropriate education to

remain current in how to best perform their duties

as Directors. Directors maintain memberships of

relevant bodies such as the Institute of Directors

and receive information individually and from

management in relation to specific issues relevant

to LIC, the markets in which it operates and the

dairy sector. Directors also undertake in-market

and stakeholder visits.

The Chair revises development plans for each of

the Directors annually. These plans specifically

focus on areas that will not only develop the

individual Director but will also enhance overall

Board capability. In addition, budget provision

is in place for Directors who want to undertake

approved specific higher-level study, the cost of

which is shared on a 50:50 basis.

Board, Committee and Director

Performance

The Board uses an external party to assist with

reviewing the performance of the Board, individual

Directors and its committees on a regular basis.

Independent consultants Propero Consulting

Limited were last engaged in 2025 and undertook

a pulse check evaluation of the performance of

the Board. The evaluation provided the Board

with additional support as part of the transition

to a new Chair and also highlighted the continued

improvement in communication between the Board

and Senior Leadership Team to support strong

decision making.

Director Independence

Directors are appointed in accordance with the

Constitution. The current Appointed Directors are

not Shareholders and are appointed to bring their

external expertise to the Board.

For the purposes of the Listing Rules, the Board has

determined all of the Directors to be independent.

While all Elected Directors are Shareholders and

purchase from and sell goods and services to

LIC, the Board does not consider them to have a

relationship that could reasonably influence, or

be perceived to influence, their ability to bring an

independent view to decisions in relation to LIC, to

act in the best interest of LIC or to represent the

interests of LIC Shareholders generally.

Board Attendance:

Board MeetingsSpecial Board MeetingsBoard Strategy Days

No of meetingsHeldAttendedHeld AttendedHeldAttended

Current directors

Ben Dickie773333

Tim Gibson763333

Sophie Haslem773333

Corrigan Sowman773333

Duncan Coull773333

Victoria Trayner763332

Mike O’Connor**743132

Tony Coltman**743133

Hamish Rumbold***723-33

Departed directors

Candace Kinser*73323-

Matt Ross*73323-

Alison Watters*73323-

*retired at the 2024 Annual Meeting

**elected at the 2024 Annual Meeting

*** appointed on 28 January 2025

32 Livestock Improvement Corporation Consolidated Annual Report 2024/25

NZX Code Principle 3, Board committees: The board should use committees where this
will enhance its effectiveness in key areas, while still retaining board responsibility.

Committees

LIC Board committees review and consider in

detail the policies and proposals developed

by management and make recommendations

to the Board. They do not take action or make

decisions on behalf of the Board unless specifically

mandated to do so. A committee or an individual

Director can engage independent legal counsel

at LIC's expense with the prior approval of the

Board Chair.

The Board will occasionally appoint a committee

of Directors to consider or approve a specific

proposal or action if the timing of meetings or

availability of Directors means the matter cannot

be considered by the full Board. Their deliberations

and decisions are reported back to the Board no

later than the next meeting.


Audit, Finance & Risk Committee

A Sub-Committee of the Board, the Audit, Finance

& Risk Committee, ensures the Company complies

with its audit, financial and risk management

responsibilities. It operates under a written

charter, which is available on the LIC website. The

Committee is chaired by Appointed Director Sophie

Haslem, with the other members being:

All current members of the Committee are

considered to be independent. Management only

attend Committee meetings at the invitation of the

Committee.

The Committee meets at least four times a year

and met eight times in 2024/25.

As at 1 June 2024Ben Dickie, Victoria Trayner and

Corrigan Sowman

As at 28 January 2025Ben Dickie, Victoria Trayner,

Corrigan Sowman and

Hamish Rumbold

Chair

As noted above, LIC's Chair is assessed to be an

independent Director. LIC's Board also endorses

the separation of the roles of the Chair and

Chief Executive (CE) and a Director should not

simultaneously hold both roles. For the avoidance

of doubt, the positions of Board Chair and CE are

currently held by two separate individuals.

To ensure appropriate management where

necessary, the LIC Board Charter sets out an

exception to this whereby the Board may appoint a

Director to assume the post of CE concurrently on

a temporary basis when the post of CE is vacant,

for a period of no longer than six months. This

can be extended, only where the position of CE

is still vacant, for a further maximum period of six

months. At the termination of that further period,

that Director shall resign from the Board.

Livestock Improvement Corporation Consolidated Annual Report 2024/25 33

People and Culture Committee
A Sub-Committee of the Board, the People and

Culture Committee, approves appointments and

terms of remuneration of the Chief Executive,

oversees the people policies for LIC and also

considers and assists the Board in its director

appointment process and, where appropriate,

recommends to the Board any wage and salary

percentage adjustments for the Co-operative's

employees. It operates under a written charter,

which is available on the LIC website. The

Committee is chaired by Appointed Director Tim

Gibson with the other members being:

All current members of the Committee are

considered to be independent. Management only

attends Committee meetings at the invitation of

the Committee.

The Committee meets at least four times a year

and met four times in 2024/25. For completeness,

the Company does not have a nomination

committee as recommendations and decisions

relating to Director appointments are made by the

full Board as outlined on page 31.

Disclosure Committee

A Sub-Committee of the Board, the Disclosure

Committee assists the Board and Company in

ensuring that all material information is identified,

reported for review by the Disclosure Committee

and, if required, disclosed promptly and without

delay to the NZX. It operates under a written

charter, which is available on the LIC website.

The Disclosure Committee is chaired by Board

Chair Corrigan Sowman with the other members

being AFRC Chair Sophie Haslem, the Chief

Executive, Chief Financial Officer, General Counsel

and Communications and Brand Engagement

Manager. Disclosure Committee meetings are

also attended by other members of management

as required.

The Committee meets as and when required and

met once in 2024/25.

As at 1 June 2024Corrigan Sowman, Matt Ross,

Duncan Coull and Alison Watters

As at 1 October 2024Corrigan Sowman, Tony Coltman,

Duncan Coull and Mike O’Connor

34 Livestock Improvement Corporation Consolidated Annual Report 2024/25

Takeovers
Due to LIC’s co-operative company status, its

Constitution and the Dairy Industry Restructuring

Act 2001 (DIRA) based shareholding restrictions,

LIC considers it is not necessary to have takeover

protocols in place. Under LIC’s Constitution no

person shall hold a relevant interest of more

than 5% of the total number of ordinary shares in

the Company.

Board Committee attendance:

Audit, Finance & Risk

Committee

People and Culture

Committee

Disclosure

Committee

No of meetingsHeldAttendedHeld AttendedHeldAttended

Current directors

Ben Dickie87

Tim Gibson44

Sophie Haslem8811

Corrigan Sowman884411

Duncan Coull44

Victoria Trayner88

Mike O’Connor**42

Tony Coltman**43

Hamish Rumbold***82

Departed directors

Matt Ross*41

Alison Watters*41

*retired at the 2024 Annual Meeting

**elected at the 2024 Annual Meeting

*** appointed on 28 January 2025

Livestock Improvement Corporation Consolidated Annual Report 2024/25 35

NZX Code Principle 4, Reporting and disclosure: The Board should demand integrity in
financial and non-financial reporting, and in the timeliness and balance of corporate

disclosures.

Financial reporting

The Board is responsible overall for ensuring

the integrity of the Company's reporting to

Shareholders, including financial statements

that comply with generally accepted accounting

practice (NZ GAAP).

The Board's Audit, Finance & Risk Committee

oversees the quality, reliability and accuracy of the

financial statements and related documents and

its role is more fully described in its Charter, which is

available on the LIC website. In undertaking its role,

the Committee makes enquiries of management

and the external auditors, including requiring

management representations so that the Directors

can be satisfied as to the validity and accuracy of

all aspects of LIC's financial reporting.

Disclosure to the market

LIC has a written disclosure policy: the Continuous

Disclosure Policy can be found on our website. It

sets out requirements for disclosure promptly and

without delay to the market of material information,

so that all stakeholders have equal access to

information. The Board specifically considers with

management at each board meeting whether

there are any issues which might require disclosure

to the market under the NZX continuous disclosure

requirements.

Non-financial reporting

Sustainability

LIC’s annual sustainability report is prepared in

accordance with the core option of the Global

Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standards.

Diversity, Equity and Inclusion

The Company fosters an inclusive working

environment that promotes employment equity and

workforce diversity at all levels, including within

the Senior Leadership Team and the Board. The

Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Policy is available

on LIC's website at lic.co.nz/shareholders/

corporategovernance.

As at the 2024/25 year-end, members of the

Board and Senior Leadership Team self-identified

as follows:

The Diversity, Equity & Inclusion Committee aims

to foster a workplace culture that values and

promotes diversity, equity and inclusion.

For 2024/25 the Committee focused on

topics such as:

• Te Ao Māori Strategy

• Women in Leadership

• Cultural Celebration

• Neurodiversity

20252024

MFGDMFGD

LIC Board72-54-

LIC Senior

Leadership

Team

62-53-

Key: M = Male / F = Female / GD = Gender Diverse

36 Livestock Improvement Corporation Consolidated Annual Report 2024/25

LIC continues to collect baseline data from its
employees on an opt-in basis, which includes

religion, gender identity and disability, in

addition to age and ethnicity. This information

has highlighted that LIC is a reasonably diverse

company. The aim is to continually update our

baseline data so that targeted initiatives can be

completed.

In support of initiatives that foster an inclusive

working environment, all external advertising

for positions at LIC are worded to encourage a

diverse range of applicants and state LIC’s desire

to drive for diversity, equity and inclusion within our

workplace. Management appointment interviews

are conducted by a panel that represents diversity

of thought. Training for employees is provided on

the benefits of diversity, equity and inclusion and

has been developed and implemented to drive an

understanding of unconscious bias.

Non-financial risks

LIC's assessment of exposure to non-financial risks,

including economic, environmental and health and

safety risks, is included in LIC's risk assessment

process described under Principle 6.

NZX Code Principle 5, Remuneration: The remuneration of directors and executives

should be transparent, fair and reasonable.

Directors Remuneration

Under LIC's Constitution, LIC has an Honoraria

Committee tasked with considering and

recommending to Shareholders the form and

amount of fees paid to LIC’s Directors. The

Honoraria Committee is made up of between

two and four Shareholders, elected by their

fellow Shareholders. The Honoraria Committee’s

Terms of Reference are on the LIC website. LIC

does not have a directors’ remuneration policy,

relying instead on the Honoraria Committee to

recommend to Shareholders the remuneration to

be paid to the Directors.

The total remuneration for LIC's Directors is

approved by Shareholders at the Annual Meeting

and the current pool of $783,000 for all nine

Directors was approved at the Annual Meeting held

in September 2024.

Directors of the Company received the following

remuneration for the twelve months ending

31 May 2025:

In thousands of New Zealand dollars

BoardAFRCP & C

Total

Fees

Current directors

Corrigan Sowman144144

Ben Dickie6969

Tim Gibson681381

Sophie Haslem682088

Duncan Coull6969

Victoria Trayner6969

Mike O’Connor**5050

Tony Coltman**5050

Hamish Rumbold***2424

Departed directors

Candace Kinser*1717

Matt Ross*2020

Alison Watters*2020

701

*retired at the 2024 Annual Meeting

**elected at the 2024 Annual Meeting

*** appointed on 28 January 2025

Livestock Improvement Corporation Consolidated Annual Report 2024/25 37

In addition to the above remuneration, and in
accordance with the Constitution, Directors

are reimbursed for any actual and reasonable

expenses incurred while on LIC business. This is

paid in the form of a standard annual incidental

allowance with any further actual and reasonable

expenses incurred while on LIC business also

reimbursed. The standard annual incidental

allowance is set at $1,200 for each Director and

$6,000 for the Chair. The payment of a standard

incidental allowance reduces the administrative

effort required in submitting and processing

transactions of a relatively low value.

The Directors receive no other benefits.

No Directors of subsidiaries received any

remuneration or other benefits in their role as

a Director of that subsidiary. The remuneration

of employees that receive more than $100,000

as a result of employee remuneration (and

other benefits) is included in the Employees'

Remuneration table on page 39.

Chief Executive Remuneration

Chief Executive (CE) David Chin’s remuneration

package is made up of a combination of base

salary and annual performance payments. His

performance is assessed based on a range of

factors including:

• Overall financial performance (40%): delivery

of the annual plan and financial budget

• Overall strategic performance (60%), including:

-Improve delivery of products and services

to customers including growing MINDA

integrations and a target to improve the

customer Net Promoter Score;

-Conduct a review of LIC’s strategy; and

-Continue to build a highly motivated

workforce where talent and leadership skills

are developed.

The remuneration paid to LIC’s CE for the year

ending 31 May 2025 is set out below:

The CE’s current remuneration package consists

of $563,000 TPV and short-term incentive

target of achieving both budget goals and other

standard objectives (20% of TPV) as well as stretch

objectives in relation to strategy (20% of TPV)

and does not include any long-term incentives or

share options.

Base Salary (TPV)

563

2023/24 year short-term incentive

payment received

90

Total

653

38 Livestock Improvement Corporation Consolidated Annual Report 2024/25

Employee Remuneration
LIC has a transparent Remuneration Policy for all

employees, which is approved by the People and

Culture Committee. This is an internal policy and is

available to all employees on LIC's intranet.

LIC aims to have a remuneration framework

and policies to attract and retain talented and

motivated people. The Company wants to:

1. Be recognised as a great place to work;

2. Recognise and reward successes, while

encouraging teamwork and a high

performance culture;

3. Be fair and consistent; and

4. Be true to our values of integrity, innovation,

spirit of co-operation, in tune and passion.

We use market data to determine fair remuneration

levels for all staff. Short-term incentives apply

to executive and certain management roles for

achievement of specific objectives and in relation

to achievement of project initiatives and are paid in

the following period. During the period 1 June 2024

to 31 May 2025 the following numbers of employees

(not being Directors) received total remuneration,

including benefits and short-term incentives

relating to the 2023/24 year, of at least $100,000:

Remuneration Range (Gross)Current EmployeesExited EmployeesTotal

100,000 – 109,99980282

110,000 – 119,99961162

120,000 – 129,99948351

130,000 – 139,99929130

140,000 – 149,99939140

150,000 – 159,99926127

160,000 – 169,99916117

170,000 – 179,99913417

180,000 – 189,999718

190,000 – 199,9996-6

200,000 – 209,9994-4

210,000 – 219,9996-6

220,000 – 229,9992-2

230,000 – 239,9995-5

240,000 – 249,9994-4

250,000 – 259,9992-2

260,000 - 269,9991-1

270,000 - 279,9994-4

280,000 - 289,9991-1

290,000 - 299,999112

310,000 - 319,9991-1

390,000 – 399,9991-1

400,000 – 409,9991-1

430,000 – 439,9991-1

480,000 - 489,9991-1

500,000 – 509,9991-1

510,000 – 519,9991-1

650,000 – 659,9991-1

36316379

Livestock Improvement Corporation Consolidated Annual Report 2024/25 39

NZX Code Principle 6, Risk management: Directors should have a sound understanding
of the material risks faced by the issuer and how to manage them. The Board should

regularly verify that the issuer has appropriate processes that identify and manage

potential and material risks.

Managing Risk

LIC has a risk management framework in place

to support the identification, quantification and

management of risk. LIC’s risk management

framework fosters improved ownership of risk

identification and management across all levels of

the business and an online risk tool supports this

occurring in real time. Key risk indicators provide

management with early warning of any risks

requiring increased focus. LIC’s risk ratings against

appetite are reported to the Senior Leadership

Team and the Audit, Finance & Risk Committee

on a regular basis, with each risk category and

its associated risk causes and controls reviewed

periodically by the Senior Leadership Team and the

Audit, Finance & Risk Committee.

Biosecurity & Animal Health

A biosecurity or animal health event

impacts LIC’s livestock or its ability

to provide products or services to its

customers.

Information Security

The availability, integrity or confidentiality of

information managed by LIC is compromised

due to a malicious or unintentional

information security incident.

Brand Damage

Continued short-term reputational

damage results in damage to LIC’s brand.

Financial Risk

Failure to manage LIC’s debts and financial

leverage or to identify fraud, internal errors

or money owed results in LIC being unable

to cover operational costs and/or pay back

its debts.

Compliance

Breaches of laws, regulations, licences,

standards, NZX continuous disclosure

requirements or Overseas Market Access

Requirements result in restrictions,

penalties, or loss.

People & Capability

Availability, capability and engagement of

our people and key vendors to effectively

execute LIC's strategic plan.

Disruption to Production or Service

Any disruption caused by processes, people,

equipment, systems, software availability or

external events which affects LIC’s ability to

deliver quality semen or other products and

services to its customers.

Strategic Risk

An inability to deliver LIC’s agreed strategy

due to disruption, planning, risk, resourcing

and other barriers not identified or managed.

Market Disruption

The inability to commercialise innovations

or respond quickly to market disruption or

emerging technologies causes reduced

use by Shareholders of existing products or

services with a resultant reduction in revenue.

Health & Safety

The potential for injury or loss of life for

employees, contractors or visitors engaged

in LIC business activities or on LIC sites or

prosecution of the organisation.

LIC’s risk categories are:

40 Livestock Improvement Corporation Consolidated Annual Report 2024/25

Of particular interest to Shareholders and
stakeholders will be the following updates on LIC’s

key risk categories:

Health and safety

The health and safety of people, our staff,

customers, contractors and anyone we come

into contact with, is of utmost importance to LIC

and remains our highest priority, regardless of

the country they are based in, or which site they

are based at.

Regular reporting to the Senior Leadership Team

and the Board provides assurance that LIC’s health

and safety system is operating effectively. Directors

and senior leaders are required to visit sites to

verify for themselves that critical risk controls are in

place and operating as expected.

LIC has identified ten critical health and safety

risks: high-risk hazards we believe have a high

likelihood of causing death or life-changing injuries

if uncontrolled. These are:

• Adverse customer behaviour

• Bull drafting

• Bull handling in yards/barns

• Driving on national roads

• Farm vehicles (tractors)

• Lone work (working alone/remotely)

• Other animal handling in yards/barns (eg

cows, heifers, calves)

• Psychosocial factors – work design,

interpersonal relationships, work environment

• Quad bikes and side-by-sides

• Working at heights

These hazards are well-controlled and risk reviews

are conducted regularly to ensure the controls

remain in place and are working.

All Business units have elected health and safety

representatives and there is a quarterly formal

governance forum, chaired by LIC’s CE. Each

business unit is also required to develop a bespoke

health and safety plan to continually improve

health and safety management in their area.

Progress against these plans is reviewed at the

Health and Safety Governance Forum meeting.

LIC uses the Lost Time Injury Frequency Rate (LTIFR)

as its main safety metric. The LTIFR is not LIC’s sole

safety measure – it complements a range of other

leading and lagging safety measures, which are

regularly reported to the Senior Leadership Team

and the Board.

LIC reported two notifiable incidents and one

notifiable illness to Worksafe NZ. These incidents

were internally comprehensively investigated and

corrective actions implemented. Worksafe NZ

chose not to investigate the incidents further.

Fewer critical risk related events (including near-

miss and incident reports) were reported this year

when compared to last year. LIC’s lost time injuries

have increased when compared to last year.

Animal handling and driving remain the biggest

source of critical risk-related event reports.

Significant areas of focus during 2024/25 include:

• Improving the management and control of

risks associated with customer violence,

threatening or inappropriate behaviour

towards our staff.

• Improving worker safety on customer facilities

by ceasing the delivery of artificial breeding

services from a herringbone shed platform,

following the earlier cessation of services

from trolleys.

• Improving lone worker safety when working in

remote locations.

• A review of LIC’s health and exposure

monitoring procedures to ensure that hazards

that could adversely impact worker health is

identified, managed and the workers’ health is

monitored, where required.

LIC’s continued focus on health and safety has

seen LIC retain its secondary level status following

the annual ACC audit.

2024/252023/24

LTIFR (200,000 h)4.332.35

Notifiable Events/

Illnesses

32

Livestock Improvement Corporation Consolidated Annual Report 2024/25 41

Disruption to production or service
The Company’s ability to provide sufficient quality

bull semen during a season relies on several

factors, including the maintenance and operation

of key equipment, staff, training and adherence to

approved procedures and processes. An inability

to meet demand for the Company’s semen would

result in significant reputational damage as well

as a reduction in New Zealand revenue. Standard

operating procedures are well documented and

regularly reviewed. Semen quality is monitored

daily and non-return rates are monitored

weekly during the peak of the season. A crisis

management framework is in place, supported

by defined key roles and alternates and business

continuance plans, and these are reviewed

and tested regularly including an annual crisis

simulation exercise.

Information security

Reliance on technology, IT systems and services

increases the impact of system outages and

data loss should a significant adverse technology

event occur. LIC’s toolsets and visibility across

the technology environment provide the ability to

detect potential threats. Business continuity and

disaster recovery plans are in place (including for

cyber attacks), reviewed regularly and backups

are performed regularly to support LIC’s recovery

should it be needed. LIC regularly undertakes

phishing simulations and training to assess staff

preparedness and vigilance.

Financial Risk

LIC has stringent processes in place to ensure

budgets, forecasts and financial reporting are

accurate and timely. LIC maintains internal controls

to manage delegated authority and remove the

opportunity for fraudulent activity through the

segregation of duties.

The Company’s revenue may be reduced as

farmers decrease expenditure as a consequence

of reduced returns, availability of cash or an

increased cost of production. Reductions in New

Zealand’s milk price will affect returns paid to

Shareholders: as a net exporter of milk, New

Zealand’s milk price is heavily influenced by

reference to the price set by the Global Dairy Trade.

Rural lenders’ approach to their lending portfolio

may result in a tightening in policy and in turn less

cash on farm. As a result, farmers may look to

reduce both their capital spend as well as farm

working expenses, including herd improvement.

Biosecurity and animal health

Quarantine procedures are in place in all LIC

controlled locations with quarantine bulls

maintained separately to production bulls.

Controls are in place on LIC’s bull farms, including

segregation of bulls and double fencing, for safety

and to reduce the risk of unwanted organisms,

such as Mycoplasma bovis (M.bovis). Bulls are

regularly inspected and undergo health testing.

Business continuity plans are in place and tested.

LIC has veterinary and epidemiological expertise

within the Company.

42 Livestock Improvement Corporation Consolidated Annual Report 2024/25

Market disruption
The inability to commercialise innovations

and/or respond quickly to market disruption or

emerging technologies could cause reduced use by

Shareholders of existing products and services with

a resultant reduction in revenue.

LIC maintains a watching brief on the innovation

and technology landscape and follows agile

product development methodologies to enable

quicker commercialisation of new and improved

products and services and the Board prioritises

capital spend to ensure developments align with

farmer needs.

Compliance

Breaches of laws, regulations, licences, standards,

NZX continuous disclosure requirements, or market

access requirements, could result in restrictions,

penalties, or loss. LIC uses the New Zealand legal

compliance software tool ComplyWith to ensure

clarity of obligations across the organisation

and for tracking adherence to compliance

requirements.

Strategic risk

Disruption, planning, risk, resourcing or other

barriers not identified or managed could lead to an

inability to deliver on LIC’s strategy, as would the

lack of availability, capability and engagement of

our people and key vendors. LIC regularly reviews

progress against strategic objectives and has

developed key metrics to ensure delivery of the

commitments made to Shareholders.

The Board and Management continue to explore

growth opportunities and ways to improve

efficiency within LIC and for dairy farmers through

innovative products and solutions. There is

also a continued focus on genomic evaluation,

appropriate selection principles and careful

monitoring of the elite portion of the national herd

to ensure LIC’s breeding scheme continues to

deliver superior dairy genetics to assist farmers in

improving productivity. Off-shore business activity

also provides a buffer for NZ-specific impacts.

Climate

Climate risk is a sub-category risk in LIC’s risk

management tool as it impacts more than one of

LIC's key risk areas. LIC has identified transition

and physical risks related to climate change.

LIC measures and publicly reports our greenhouse

gas emissions, has set emissions reduction targets,

and works with our staff and suppliers to build

sustainability into our purchasing decisions. LIC

continues to offer farmers the tools and genetics

they need to breed more efficient cows and drive

sustainability improvements on-farm.

Livestock Improvement Corporation Consolidated Annual Report 2024/25 43

NZX Code Principle 7, Auditors: The Board should ensure the quality and independence
of the external audit process.

External Audit

LIC has an External Auditor Independence

Policy that requires the external auditor to be

independent and to be seen as independent.

This policy can be found on the LIC website. The

Board is satisfied that there is no relationship

between the auditor and LIC or any related

person at this time that could compromise the

auditor's independence. The Board also obtains

confirmation of independence formally from

the auditor.

To ensure full and frank discussion between

the Audit, Finance & Risk Committee and the

auditors, the auditor's senior representatives meet

separately with the Committee.

The External Auditor Independence Policy sets

out restrictions on non-audit work that can be

performed by the auditor and the Audit, Finance

& Risk Committee is required to approve all

engagements with the auditor. The policy requires

rotation of the key audit partner every five years, a

requirement that we are fully compliant with. LIC’s

external auditor attends its Annual Meeting each

year to answer questions from Shareholders in

relation to the audit.

Internal Audit

LIC does not have a separate internal audit

function. The Risk & Assurance Team performs,

reviews and arranges for external audit resource

to perform internal audits as agreed with the Audit,

Finance & Risk Committee. The Risk & Assurance

Manager reports to the Audit, Finance & Risk

Committee on internal audit or review issues

and incidents, improvements and changes to

internal controls.

NZX Code Principle 8, Shareholder rights and relations: The Board should respect the

rights of shareholders and foster constructive relationships with shareholders that

encourage them to engage with the issuer.

The Board recognises that, as its Shareholders

are the Company’s owners, customers and

stakeholders, it is responsible for overseeing

Shareholder engagement. Shareholder

engagement reflects LIC’s co-operative ownership

structure and values and aims to be efficient,

effective, fit for purpose and meet Shareholder

expectations regarding increased transparency

about LIC’s activities.

The LIC website is the key place for LIC's financial

and operational information, including the

Company's presentations, reports, announcements

and media releases. The website is updated

immediately when any announcement is made

to the NZX. Important corporate governance

documents such as the charters and policies

referred to in this section of the Annual Report can

also be found on the LIC website and the Annual

Report is available in both electronic and hard

copy formats.

LIC provides half-year and annual reporting to the

NZX to keep Shareholders informed and discloses

information to the NZX to meet its continuous

disclosure obligations as required. The Company

communicates with Shareholders through its

Annual Report, half-year financial statements

and at Shareholder meetings, as well as through a

range of media channels on topics which it believes

will be of interest to Shareholders.

LIC encourages all Shareholders to receive

communications electronically but can provide

hard copies of information as and when required.

All Shareholders have the right to vote on

major decisions which may change the nature

of the Company, and the Board encourages

all Shareholders to attend and participate in

Shareholder meetings.

This year the LIC Annual Meeting will be held both

virtually and in person on Wednesday 17 September

at 6pm at LIC Newstead, Hamilton and online (lic.

co.nz/annualmeeting). LIC welcomes Shareholders'

attendance either on-line or in person. A Notice of

Meeting was sent to Shareholders in July 2025.

44 Livestock Improvement Corporation Consolidated Annual Report 2024/25

Statutory Requirements
Entries in the interests register

Directors

All Elected Directors are customers and Shareholders of Livestock Improvement Corporation Limited and

purchase products and services for their farming operations on an ongoing basis.

Directorships and Memberships

Benjamin John Dickie:

Director of:

• Taranaki Veterinary Centre Limited (Ceased 28

September 2024)

Timothy Dunlop Gibson:

Director of:

• The Equanut Company Limited

• Port Otago Limited and subsidiaries:

• Chalmers Properties Limited

• Fiordland Pilot Services Limited

• Port Chalmers Container Terminal Limited

• Te Rapa Gateway Limited

• Silver Fern Farms Co-Operative Limited

• Silver Fern Farms Limited and subsidiaries:

• Silver Fern Farms Joint Ventures Limited

• Silver Fern Farms Holdings Limited

• The Skills Group Trust (Chair)

• Tūhana Business & Human Rights Limited

• Tūhana Consulting Limited

Sophie Haslem:

Director of:

• Centreport Limited and subsidiaries:

• Centreport Captive Insurance Limited

• Centreport Properties Limited

• Kordia Group Limited and subsidiaries:

• Kordia Limited

• Kordia New Zealand Limited

• nib NZ Limited

• nib NZ Insurance Limited

• nib NZ Holdings Limited

• Payments NZ Limited

• Rangatira Limited

Shareholder of:

• CH4 Global Inc

Blair Albert O’Keeffe

Director of:

• Unison Networks Limited

• Central Air Ambulance Rescue Limited

• Port of Napier Limited (Chair)

• Director of Clarus Group companies, including:

• Rockgas Limited

• First Gas Limited

• First Gas Midco Limited

• First Gas Topco Limited

• First Renewables Power Limited

• First Renewables Power Midco Limited

• First Renewables Power Topco Limited

• Firstlight Network Limited

• First Sunrise Holdco Limited

• First Sunrise Bidco Limited

• First Sunrise Midco Limited

• First Sunrise Topco Limited

• Gas Services NZ Limited, including:

• First Renewables Limited

• Gas Services NZ Midco Limited

Director and Shareholder of:

• Napier Port Holdings Limited (Chair)

Chair of:

• Hawke’s Bay Rescue Helicopter Trust

• Hawke’s Bay Regional Recovery Agency

Hamish John Rumbold

Director of:

• House of Travel Holdings Limited

• Perigee Holdco Limited (Chair) (as of 21 July 2025)

Livestock Improvement Corporation Consolidated Annual Report 2024/25 45

Antony Paul Coltman
Director of

• ATS Fuel Limited (ceased as of 28 February 2025)

• Pro-Active NZ Limited (ceased as of 28 February 2025)

• Ruralco NZ Limited (ceased as of 28 February 2025)

Director and Shareholder of:

• Band 4 Water Limited

• Canlac Holdings 2014 Limited

• Central Plains Water Limited

Shareholder of:

• Global Farming Trust

Advisory roles/member of:

• Rimanui Dairy Advisory Committee

• Fortuna Production Advisory Committee

• Puduhue Advisor (Chile)

Corrigan George Sowman:

Member of:

• Fonterra Sustainability Advisory Panel (Ceased

September 2024)

• Craigmore Sustainables Performance Committee

(Uruwhenua Farms Limited Consultancy)

Michael John O’Connor

Director of:

• Harapepe Dairies Limited

• Spectrum Group Services Limited

Director and Shareholder of:

• Spectrum Dairies GP Limited

• Finbar Farm Limited

Duncan James Bruce Coull

Director and Shareholder of:

• RBS (2015) Limited

• RBS Invest Limited

• Ballance Agri-Nutrients Limited

• Ngutunui Dairies Limited

Director of:

• New Zealand Phosphate Company Limited

Victoria Jean Trayner

Director of:

• Waimakariri Irrigation Limited

• North Canterbury Land Holding Limited

• INZ Accreditation Limited

• Irrigation New Zealand Incorporated Society

Director and Shareholder of:

• Platinum Farming Limited

Senior Staff

In addition to the directorships of LIC subsidiaries

as detailed below, senior members of staff have

recorded the following interests:

David Luk Chin (Chief Executive)

Director of:

• Safer Farms

Paul Ferguson Dunbar (GM International)

Director of:

• Eurogene AI Services (Ireland) Limited (in which LIC has

a shareholding)


Brent Denis Mealings (Chief Financial Officer)

Director of:

• Figured Limited (in which LIC has a shareholding)

Dhaya Paran Sivakumar (Chief Information Officer)

Director of:

• Kordia Group Limited

46 Livestock Improvement Corporation Consolidated Annual Report 2024/25

The Directors of the Company’s subsidiaries as at
31 May 2025 are set out below:

• LIC Agritechnology Company Limited: Ben

Dickie, Tim Gibson, Sophie Haslem, Tony

Coltman, Corrigan Sowman, Duncan Coull,

Victoria Trayner and Mike O’Connor.

• Livestock Improvement (New Zealand)

Corporation Limited: David Chin and

Brent Mealings

• LIC Ventures No. 1 Limited: David Chin and

Brent Mealings

• LIC Ventures No.3 Limited: David Chin and

Brent Mealings

• Agrigate GP Limited: Brent Mealings and

Dhaya Sivakumar

• Livestock Improvement Pty Limited:

Michael Rose

• Beacon Automation Pty Limited: Brent

Mealings and Michael Rose

• Livestock Improvement Corporation (UK)

Limited: Brent Mealings and James Simpson

• LIC Ireland Limited:

Brent Mealings and James Simpson

Emma Blott resigned from the following subsidiaries

of the Company during 2024/25:

• Agrigate GP Limited

• Beacon Automation Pty Limited

• Livestock Improvement Pty Limited

• Livestock Improvement (UK) Limited

• LIC Ireland Limited

Livestock Improvement Corporation Consolidated Annual Report 2024/25 47

Entries in the interest register
a) Participation in the Company’s Contract

Mating Scheme could lead to the potential

sale of bull calves to LIC in the 2026/27

season. Directors participating in the

scheme include:

b) Share Dealings by Directors

As at 31 May 2025 the Directors other than the

Appointed Directors (either in their own names

and/or in the name(s) of their dairy farming

entities) as qualifying users of LIC’s products

and services are holders of, or control the

exercise of the right to vote or the acquisition

or disposal of, the following shares (including

Nil Paid Shares):

Ordinary Shares include fully paid shares

which are quoted on the NZX and Nil Paid

Shares, which must be paid up over time by

Shareholders.

c) Loans to Directors of the Parent and

Subsidiaries

There have been no loans during the year.

d) Directors Indemnity and Insurance

The Company has issued a Deed of

Indemnity and insured all its Directors and

Senior Managers against liabilities to third

parties for any acts or omissions in their

capacity as Directors of the Company and its

Related Parties.

e) Use of Company Information

There were no notices from Directors of

the Company requesting to use Company

Information received in their capacity as

Directors, which would not otherwise have

been available to them.

DirectorPotential Calf

Sales

Potential Value

Corrigan Sowman3$65,550

Tony Coltman2$43,700

31 May 2025

DirectorOrdinary Shares

Ben Dickie*61,190

Mike O'Connor273,144

Corrigan Sowman80,488

Tony Coltman123,820

Duncan Coull**8,100

Victoria Trayner5,600

*Includes shares purchased through participation in the Voluntary

Investment Scheme and shares compulsorily purchased to meet

LIC’s Shareholding Requirements

**Includes shares compulsorily purchased to meet LIC’s

Shareholding Requirements

48 Livestock Improvement Corporation Consolidated Annual Report 2024/25

RESOLUTION OF DIRECTORS
DATED 17 JULY 2025 CONFIRMING THE CO-OPERATIVE STATUS OF LIVESTOCK

IMPROVEMENT CORPORATION LIMITED

RESOLVED THAT:

Livestock Improvement Corporation Limited

(Company) was registered as a Co-operative

Company under the provisions of the Co-operative

Companies Act 1996 (Act) on 1 March 2002.

In the opinion of the Board of Directors, the

Company has been a Co-operative Company from

that date to the end of the accounting year ended

31 May 2025.

The grounds for this opinion are:

1. The principal activity of the Company involves

supplying artificial breeding, herd testing, herd

recording and other services to transacting

Shareholders (as that term is defined in

section 4 of the Act). Accordingly, the principal

activity of the Company is, and is stated in

the Constitution of the Company as being, a

co-operative activity (as the term is defined in

section 3 of the Act); and

2. Not less than 60 percent of the voting rights

attached to shares in the Company are held by

transacting Shareholders.

Size of ShareholdingNumber of Shareholders*Shares Held% of Total

1 - 999552359,6770.24%

1,000 - 1,9997971,247,4640.84%

2,000 - 2,9997971,940,3111.31%

3,000 - 3,9996172,043,2721.38%

4,000 - 4,9998223,611,5922.45%

5,000 - 5,9994092,267,9531.54%

6,000 - 6,9993932,538,1281.72%

7,000 - 7,9993502,594,0221.76%

8,000 - 8,9994303,629,1392.46%

9,000 - 9,9992682,556,5191.73%

10,000 - 14,9991,03712,682,4408.59%

15,000 - 19,99964611,180,8497.57%

20,000 - 24,9993958,810,0845.97%

25,000 - 29,9992777,540,0425.11%

30,000 - 34,9991956,294,6214.26%

35,000 - 39,9991314,862,3393.29%

40,000 - 49,9991948,666,9175.87%

50,000 - 99,99928018,488,57812.52%

100,000 - 199,999618,364,0135.66%

200,000 - 299,999153,627,5712.46%

300,000 - 499,99972,636,8741.79%

500,000 - 999,99964,531,3943.07%

1,000,000 +1227,208,62118.42%

*The number of Shareholders above is based on the number of separate/individual farms. The table below setting out the twenty largest shareholdings

amalgamates Shareholders with multiple farms.

Spread of Shareholders as at 30 June 2025

(including treasury stock and nil paid shares)

Livestock Improvement Corporation Consolidated Annual Report 2024/25 49

Twenty Largest Shareholdings as at 30 June 2025
(including treasury stock and nil paid shares)

ShareholderShares held% of total shares

Trinity Lands Limited7,315,625 4.95%

LIC Treasury Stock5,337,584 3.61%

Kotare Futures Limited3,025,000 2.05%

Sim Brothers Limited2,937,218 1.99%

David Lockhart Easton & Anthea Clare Easton & RFH Trustees2,233,014 1.51%

Melrose Dairy Limited1,600,087 1.08%

Anglesea Agriculture Limited1,517,203 1.03%

Cayuga Limited1,220,443 0.83%

Robert Laurentius Johannes Bruin & Annemarie Bruin1,154,651 0.78%

Kotare Pastoral Limited1,063,942 0.72%

CIP Nominees No 1 Limited (Employee Share Scheme)1,038,072 0.70%

Mangatarata Farms Limited850,000 0.58%

DB Douglas Limited816,956 0.55%

Mark Braden Neil Dewdney & Anne Heather Dewdney & Victoria Ann Dewdney785,471 0.53%

Christopher John Stark & Graham Carr718,372 0.49%

Pilsen 2021 Limited616,944 0.42%

Malrose Properties Limited575,2410.39%

J D & R D Wallace General Partnership Limited566,288 0.38%

Bishop Farms Oxford Limited 474,572 0.32%

Kaimanawa Farms Limited443,502 0.30%

Noremac Developments Limited437,7720.30%

Landcorp Farming Limited419,540 0.28%

Credit Rating Status

LIC currently does not have a credit rating.

Substantial product holders

Based on substantial product holder notices

received by the Company from shareholders, as at

31 May 2025, the following parties were substantial

product holders of the Company:

LIC understands that David Gregory Turner’s

substantial product holder disclosure is in relation

to financial products held by Trinity Lands Limited,

also disclosed here. David Gregory Turner’s

substantial product holding notice states his

interest arises because he has the power to

exercise, or to control the exercise of, a right to vote

attached to the financial products held by Trinity

Lands Limited and has the power to acquire or

dispose of, or to control the acquisition or disposal

of, the same financial products held by Trinity

Lands Limited.

As noted above, these substantial product holder

notices were disclosed on 17 September 2024. The

Company has not received any other substantial

product holder notices since that date.

Substantial

product holders

Number of

shares

Percentage

of shares

Date of

notice

Trinity Lands

Limited

7,313,0735.168%17/09/2024

David Gregory

Turner

7,313,0735.168%17/09/2024

Key:

Number of shares = Number of quoted fully paid ordinary shares in substantial

holding at date of notice

Percentage of shares = Percentage of quoted fully paid ordinary shares in

substantial holding at date of notice

50 Livestock Improvement Corporation Consolidated Annual Report 2024/25

Based on the Company’s records, as at 31 May
2025, no shareholder holds more than 5% of the

total shares in the Company (comprising the only

class of quoted voting products of the Company).

Where a person holds a relevant interest in shares

other than by virtue of being the legal holder of

shares, the Company may not be aware of that

person’s relevant interest and would be reliant

on their lodgement of a substantial product

holder notice.

LIC notes that the disclosures made at the date of

the original notice are also available on nzx.com

under LIC’s announcements.

Donations

The Company made donations totalling $11,126

during the year ended 31 May 2025.

No political contributions are made by

the Company.

Non-Standard Listing

Livestock Improvement Corporation Limited has

been classified as a Non-Standard NZX Issuer

by the NZX, pursuant to NZX Listing Rule 1.18, by

reason of it being a Co-operative Company having

a Constitution which includes provisions with the

following effect:

The acquiring of Ordinary Shares is restricted

to New Zealand dairy farmers who derive

an income from the farming of dairy cows in

New Zealand, whose milk is supplied to a New

Zealand milk processor and who purchase

qualifying products and services from

Livestock Improvement Corporation Limited.

WAIVERS AND APPROVALS GRANTED BY NZX REGULATION LIMITED

On 29 August 2023, NZX Regulation Limited (NZ RegCo) released an Amended and restated waivers,

approvals and Rulings decision in relation to the Company in respect of the following NZX Listing Rules:

1. A Ruling that treats the “Shareholding

Requirement” as defined in LIC’s Constitution

as the "Minimum Holding" requirement for LIC

for the purposes of the Listing Rules.

2. A Ruling to the extent that the definition of

“Renounceable” refers to a Right or an offer

of securities by LIC that is transferrable to any

person entitled to hold those securities under

the Constitution. This reflects the ownership

restrictions on shares, resulting from the co-

operative nature of LIC.

3. A waiver in respect of Rules 2.3.1 and 2.3.2,

to allow for the following aspects of the

Company’s corporate governance structure:

a) Director nominations for Elected Directors

by Ordinary Shareholders to be restricted

by region, as set out in clause 22.4(b) of the

Constitution and qualification, as set out in

Schedule 3 of the Constitution;

b) the nomination procedures for Appointed

and Elected Directors (including casually

appointed directors) as set out in Schedule

3 of the Constitution;

4. A waiver in respect of Rule 3.13.1 to allow LIC

to release to the NZX details of the Nil Paid

Shares that have been converted into Fully

Paid Shares on a monthly basis, in the form as

required under Rule 3.13.1, on the first business

day of each month, aggregating the number

of Nil Paid Shares that have been paid up (if

any) in the preceding month.

Livestock Improvement Corporation Consolidated Annual Report 2024/25 51

5. A waiver from Rule 4.15.1 to allow LIC to provide
financial assistance to an Approved Holding

Entity, for the purposes of, or in connection

with, the acquisition of Equity Securities

issued, or to be issued, under the Voluntary

Investment Scheme.

6. A waiver in respect of Rule 6.2.4 to allow Nil

Paid Ordinary Shares to carry full voting rights.

Without this waiver, the Nil Paid Shares could

only carry voting rights in proportion to which

the Share is paid up.

7. A waiver in respect of Rule 6.6.1 to allow the

lien provision in clause 18 in the Constitution to

be read in place of this Rule.

8. An approval under Rule 8.1.6(b) to include the

following restrictions in the Constitution:

a) LIC is restricted in relation to the voting

securities that may be issued, as set out in

clause 3.2(b) of the Constitution, thereby

maintaining its co-operative structure;

b) ordinary shares in LIC may only be held by

or transferred to certain persons, as set out

in clause 3.2(c) of the Constitution;

c) ordinary shares in LIC shall not be held

or acquired for the benefit of any person

who is not a User, unless an exception is

provided, as set out in clause 3.2(d) of the

Constitution;

d) no person shall hold a relevant interest

in more than 5% of the total number of

ordinary shares in LIC on issue, as set out in

clause 6.3(a) of the Constitution;

e) LIC may require Users who have spent

in excess of the Minimum Purchase

Amount to compulsorily acquire sufficient

ordinary shares to meet the Shareholding

Requirement, as set out in clause 7.1 of the

Constitution;

f) LIC may require Users who no longer

spend the Minimum Purchase Amount

to compulsorily dispose of their ordinary

shares, as set out in clause 7.2 of the

Constitution; and

g) While the Dairy Industry Restructuring Act

2001 restricts voting rights in LIC, no person

can exercise, or control the exercise of,

more than 1% of the maximum number of

votes exercisable at any meeting of LIC, as

outlined at clause 20.4 of the Constitution.

52 Livestock Improvement Corporation Consolidated Annual Report 2024/25

DISCLOSURE OF FINANCIAL
ASSISTANCE AS REQUIRED UNDER THE

COMPANIES ACT 1993

A) Dividend Reinvestment Plan:

LIC proposes to provide financial assistance to

those Shareholders who elect to participate in the

Dividend Reinvestment Plan (DRP) by agreeing

to pay to the Guardian Trust Company of New

Zealand Limited (Guardian Trust), as the Approved

Holding Entity, the services and administration

fees and brokerage and commission costs incurred

for the purposes of the DRP. Craigs Investment

Partners Limited (Craigs) has been appointed as

the Broker to purchase Ordinary Shares on the

NZX market for the purposes of the DRP, and the

moneys paid by LIC to Guardian Trust as Approved

Holding Entity will include the administration fee,

brokerage and commission costs of Craigs.

LIC is required to make disclosures to all Share-

holders in respect of this financial assistance. The

exact amount of the net costs depends upon the

extent to which Shareholders participate in the

DRP. However, the total amount of net costs in the

next twelve months is estimated to be in the region

of $15,000.

In relation to the financial assistance provided for

the DRP, the LIC Board resolved on 17 July 2025 that

LIC should provide the financial assistance referred

to above (DRP Financial Assistance), for the period

of 12 months commencing 10 working days after

sending its Notice of Meeting to Shareholders

on 31 July 2025, and that the giving of the DRP

Financial Assistance is in the best interest of LIC

and is of benefit to Shareholders not receiving

that financial assistance; and that the terms

and conditions under which the DRP Financial

Assistance is given are fair and reasonable to

LIC and to the Shareholders not receiving that

financial assistance. The grounds for the Board’s

conclusions are:

a) The DRP Financial Assistance enables LIC to

provide Shareholders with an efficient means

of acquiring additional Shares in LIC without

incurring transaction costs which they would

otherwise incur;

b) The DRP Financial Assistance is available to all

eligible Shareholders, giving equal opportunity

to participate in the benefits of the DRP;

c) The additional Shares will be acquired by

Craigs through on-market transactions, or the

issue of Shares from treasury stock.

d) Shareholders who do not participate will not

be diluted or otherwise disadvantaged as no

new Shares are being issued under the DRP;

e) Participating Shareholders will pay no greater

than the higher of:

i) the volume-weighted average price of

shares trading on the NZX market during

the 20 Business Days prior to the date that

the Board determines to issue shares from

treasury stock;

ii) the average price paid by Craigs on behalf

of Participants for on-market acquisitions;

f) The DRP will enhance the liquidity in the market

for the Shares, providing a more liquid market

for both participating and non-participating

Shareholders wishing to trade in LIC Shares;

g) The DRP enables LIC to offer Shareholders

a mechanism to reinvest dividends in Shares

without resulting in unnecessary new capital

being raised through the issue of new

shares; and

h) The amount of DRP Financial Assistance is

minimal in comparison to the benefits arising

out of the DRP for Shareholders and LIC.

B) Voluntary Investment Scheme:

LIC proposes to provide financial assistance to

those Directors and Senior Managers who are

eligible and elect to participate in the Voluntary

Investment Scheme (VIS) by agreeing to pay to the

Guardian Trust, as the Approved Holding Entity, the

services and administration fees and brokerage

and commission costs incurred for the purposes of

the VIS. Craigs has been appointed as the Broker

to purchase Ordinary Shares on the NZX market for

the purposes of the VIS, and the moneys paid by

LIC to Guardian Trust as Approved Holding Entity

will include the administration fee, brokerage and

commission costs of Craigs.

LIC is required to make disclosures to all Share-

holders in respect of this financial assistance. The

exact costs depends upon the extent to which

eligible Directors and Senior Managers participate

in the VIS. However, the total costs in the next

twelve months is estimated to be in the region

of $7,000.

Livestock Improvement Corporation Consolidated Annual Report 2024/25 53

In relation to the financial assistance provided
for the VIS, the LIC Board resolved on 17 July 2025

that LIC should provide the financial assistance

referred to above (“VIS Assistance”), for the period

of 12 months commencing 10 working days after

sending its Notice of Meeting to Shareholders

on 31 July 2025, and that the giving of the VIS

Assistance is in the best interest of LIC and is of

benefit to Shareholders not receiving that financial

assistance; and that the terms and conditions

under which the VIS Assistance is given are fair

and reasonable to LIC and to the Shareholders not

receiving that financial assistance. The grounds for

the Board’s conclusions are:

a) The VIS Assistance enables LIC to provide

eligible Directors and Senior Managers a

means of acquiring additional shares in LIC

through a fixed trading plan, given the risk

they will often be information insiders, and

without incurring transaction costs which they

would otherwise incur;

b) The additional shares will be acquired by

Craigs either through on-market transactions

or the issue of Shares by LIC from treasury

stock. Participating Directors and Senior

Managers will pay the average NZX

market price paid by Craigs on market for

those Shares;

c) Participating Directors and Senior Managers

will pay a uniform price in relation to a season;

d) The VIS will enhance the liquidity in the

market for the Shares, providing a more liquid

market for both participating Directors and

Senior Managers and non- participating

Shareholders wishing to trade in LIC shares;

e) The VIS enables LIC to offer eligible Directors

and Senior Managers a mechanism to invest

in LIC Shares without resulting in unnecessary

new capital being raised through the issue of

new shares; and

f) The amount of financial assistance is

minimal in comparison to the benefits arising

out of the VIS for participating Directors

and Senior Managers, non-participating

Shareholders and LIC.

C) LIC Employee Share Scheme:

LIC proposes to provide financial assistance to

those employees who elect to participate in the

LIC Employee Share Scheme (ESS) which from 1

April 2011 has been managed by Craigs, with CIP

Nominees No. 1 Limited acting as custodian. LIC

proposes to pay the Manager's and Custodian's

fees and expenses (including brokerage). The

amount of the fees will depend on how many

employees participate in the ESS and the level of

their contributions. However, it is estimated that

the total fees in the next twelve months will be in

the region of $22,000.

In relation to the financial assistance provided

for the ESS, the Board of LIC resolved on 17

July 2025 that LIC should provide the financial

assistance referred to above (ESS Assistance)

for the period of 12 months commencing 10

working days after the date of sending its Notice

of Meeting to Shareholders on 31 July 2025, and

that the giving of the ESS Assistance is in the best

interests of LIC, and is of benefit to Shareholders

not receiving that financial assistance; and that

the terms and conditions under which the ESS

Assistance is given are fair and reasonable, to

LIC, and to the Shareholders not receiving that

financial assistance. The grounds for the Board’s

conclusions are:

a) The Employee Scheme is a valuable addition

to the benefits available to the employees

of LIC and will assist in retaining them as

valuable staff;

b) The Employee Scheme is a method of aligning

the interests of employees with the interests

of Shareholders and is an effective means

of motivating future performance of the

employees;

c) Shareholders will not be diluted or otherwise

disadvantaged as no new Shares are being

issued under the Employee Scheme;

d) The additional shares will be purchased

through Craigs at the market price;

e) The Employee Scheme will enhance the

liquidity in the market for the Shares, providing

a more liquid market for Shareholders wishing

to trade in LIC Shares; and

f) The amount of financial assistance is minimal

in comparison to the benefits arising out of the

Employee Scheme for Shareholders and LIC.

54 Livestock Improvement Corporation Consolidated Annual Report 2024/25

605 Ruakura Road
Newstead 3286

Hamilton

New Zealand

07 856 0700 | lic.co.nz

---

There's always room for improvement
Livestock Improvement Corporation Limited (LIC or the Co-operative)

Climate Statements

For the year ended 31 May 2025

About these Climate Statements
As a large, listed issuer on the New Zealand Stock Exchange (NZX), LIC is a

Climate Reporting Entity (CRE). The scope of the LIC reporting entity includes

all subsidiaries and aligns to the scope used for LIC’s consolidated financial

statements included in LIC’s Annual Report 2025, available here www.lic.co.nz/

shareholders/financial-results-announcements. This is LIC’s second set of Climate

Statements prepared under the Aotearoa New Zealand Climate Standards

published by the External Reporting Board (XRB). The Climate Statements are for

the year ended 31 May 2025 and have been reviewed by LIC’s Board of Directors.

This is still early in LIC’s climate reporting journey as we continue to integrate

climate change considerations into governance, strategy and risk management

processes. The disclosures comprising these Climate Statements comply in

all respects with Aotearoa New Zealand Climate Standard 1, Climate-related

Disclosures (NZ CS 1), in conjunction with adoption exemptions (and applicable

conditions for relying on those adoption exemptions) available under Aotearoa

New Zealand Climate Standard 2, Adoption of Aotearoa New Zealand Climate

Standards (NZ CS 2), and are presented in accordance with Aotearoa New

Zealand Climate Standard 3 (NZ CS 3), General Requirements for Climate-related

Disclosures (together the NZ CS). For example, information is disclosed in these

Climate Statements where it is considered to be material, as defined in NZ CS 3,

namely that “information is material if omitting, misstating or obscuring it could

reasonably be expected to influence decisions that primary users make on the

basis of an entity’s climate-related disclosures”. Primary users are defined as

LIC’s current and future farmer shareholders, lenders and other creditors. Given

the nature of climate-related information, we recognise that a single uniform

quantitative threshold for determining materiality is not appropriate and therefore

have applied judgment using qualitative and quantitative factors to identify,

assess, organise and review whether climate-related information is material to our

primary users.

NZ CS 2 recognises that it may take time to develop capability to produce high-

quality climate-related disclosures. LIC has adopted certain exemptions available

under NZ CS 2 for these second Climate Statements:

• Adoption provision 2, paragraph 12: Anticipated financial impacts of climate-

related risks and opportunities reasonably expected by the entity, NZ CS 1

paragraphs 15(b), 15(c) and 15(d);

• Adoption provision 4, paragraph 17: Scope 3 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, NZ

CS 1 paragraph 22(a)(iii);

• Adoption provision 5, paragraph 18: Comparatives for Scope 3 GHG emissions, NZ

CS 3 paragraph 40;

• Adoption provision 6, paragraph 21: Comparatives for metrics in an entity’s

second reporting period, NZ CS 3 paragraph 40;

• Adoption provision 7, paragraph 22: Analysis of trends in an entity’s second

reporting period, NZ CS 3 paragraph 42; and

• Adoption provision 8, paragraph 24: Scope 3 GHG emissions assurance, NZ CS 1

paragraphs 25, 26(a)(iii) and 26(c).

Approved on behalf of the Board on 20 August 2025

DirectorDirector

LIC Climate Statements

Important notice
These Climate Statements contain forward-looking statements, including climate-

related metrics, climate scenarios, climate-related risks and opportunities,

estimated climate projections, targets, assumptions, forecasts, and statements of

LIC’s future intentions.

The information within these Climate Statements reflects LIC’s best estimate

and current understanding of future climate-related events, risks, opportunities,

impacts and strategies as at 20 August 2025. LIC has sought to provide accurate

disclosures as at publication. Given the novel and developing nature of the

information contained in these Climate Statements, as well as the inherent

uncertainty of the subject matter, “accurate” does not entail certainty of outcome.

It means that LIC has undertaken appropriate measures and implemented

adequate controls such that the information presented is believed to be free from

material error or misstatement and is otherwise fairly presented.

LIC cautions that forward-looking statements are not facts but rather estimates

and judgements regarding future results that are based on current estimates,

and on current views of LIC which may be subject to change, and are necessarily

subject to risks, uncertainties and/or assumptions. Estimates may prove to be

incorrect due to unforeseen risks and general uncertainties of the business and

environment we operate in, as well as due to the inherent uncertainty in the future

impacts of climate change on our business and the dairy sector. LIC has used its

best efforts to provide a reasonable basis for forward-looking statements but is

constrained by the novel and developing nature of this subject matter. Climate-

related forward-looking statements may therefore be less reliable than other

statements LIC may make in its external reporting.

Descriptions of the qualitative and quantitative current and anticipated impacts

and current financial impacts of climate change draw on and/or represent

estimated figures only and have been developed using methodologies currently

considered by LIC to be the most suitable. They are necessarily subject to risks,

limitations, uncertainties and/or assumptions and change. In particular, the risks

and opportunities described in this document, and the target emissions reductions,

may not eventuate or may be more or less significant than anticipated. There are

many factors that could cause LIC’s actual results, performance, or achievement of

climate-related metrics (including targets) to differ materially from that described,

including economic and technological viability, as well as climate, government, and

market factors outside of LIC’s control.

Other than as provided in the limited assurance report that has been provided

with these Climate Statements, these Climate Statements, including any financial

information included, have not been subject to an external audit.

Nothing in these Climate Statements should be interpreted as an offer of interests

in financial products or earnings, capital growth, or any other legal, financial, tax,

or other advice or guidance.

Unless otherwise expressly stated, where external documents are referred to in

these Climate Statements, these do not form part of the disclosures but are simply

general and/or contextual information to direct the reader to further information,

should they wish to read more.

To the greatest extent possible under New Zealand law, LIC expressly disclaims all

liability for any direct, indirect or consequential loss or damage arising directly or

indirectly out of the use of or inability to use, or the information contained within,

these Climate Statements.

For the year ended 31 May 2025

LIC Climate Statements
4

Contents
Introduction 6

Governance 7

Strategy 12

Business model and strategy 12

Climate-related risks and opportunities and decision making 15

Current climate-related impacts 16

Scenario analysis 18

Climate-related risks and opportunities 24

Transition planning 28

Risk Management 30

Metrics and Targets 32

Independent Assurance 40

Appendices 41

One - Scenario analysis archetypes 41

Two - GHG emissions methods, assumptions and estimation uncertainty 43

Three - Independent assurance report

relating to 2024/25 Scope 1 & 2 GHG emissions 46

For the year ended 31 May 2025

5

Introduction
LIC is a New Zealand dairy farmer-owned co-

operative and a leader in pasture-based dairy

genetics and herd management. We exist to deliver

superior genetics and technological innovation to

help our shareholders sustainably farm profitable

animals and this is even more relevant to farmers

today given the growing climate challenges we’re

facing. Who we are and what we do has never been

more important for Kiwi farmers, our sector and

New Zealand as our future depends on protecting

the natural environment. The dairy sector needs to

continue to evolve, for climate change and because of

it, to retain ongoing market access.

At LIC, we are committed to reducing the emissions of

our business. LIC previously set emissions reduction

targets based on methodologies using SBTi (Science

Based Target initiatives) tools and guided by the

biogenic methane emissions reduction target in the

Climate Change Response Act 2002, with the intention

of reducing our greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and

contributing proportionately to the efforts to limit the

global average temperature increase to 1.5°C above

pre-industrial levels. While we have been working

hard on reducing emissions, the organisation has

now reviewed and revised our emissions reduction

targets to ensure that they are achievable given the

challenges the sector is currently facing with novel

technology that is being developed to mitigate

emissions not yet being feasible or available to

achieve targeted emissions reduction. Please see the

Metrics and Targets section for the updated targets.

The physical effects of climate change are

already intensifying and becoming more common,

demonstrating the need for our business to be flexible

and resilient in providing critical on-farm services to

our farmer shareholders. Climate-related transition

risks also present a potential challenge, including the

risk of regulation and legislation change, impacts of

innovation and maintaining dairy sector reputation

and market access. LIC’s business is largely driven

by the size of the national dairy herd, which has been

reducing over time and may continue to reduce in

response to climate-related transition risk pressures.

If the dairy sector is milking fewer cows, those cows

need to be better ones. This creates a climate-related

opportunity for LIC to more widely help farmers

identify and breed from their more emissions-efficient

and profitable cows. Using our genomic breeding

worth data relating to the national dairy herd, LIC

has been able to model the genetic potential enteric

methane emissions relative to milk solids

production, indicating an improved trend over more

than ten years.

LIC recognises the importance of identifying climate-

related scenarios in a consistent and comparable

way within the dairy sector. To this end, Fonterra,

LIC and Silver Fern Farms collaborated during the

reporting period to develop core scenario elements

that were common across our businesses, such as

driving forces, temperature outcomes, emissions

pathways, and high-level narratives. This joint output

was then iterated by LIC to make it more specific to

our strategy and business model. These scenarios are

not predictions of the future, rather they challenge

us to consider our strategy and business model using

plausible political, economic, social, technological,

and environmental drivers of change. These insights

can help us build resilience, prepare for potential risks

and uncertainties, and identify opportunities to lead

the way in innovation and herd improvement.

LIC Climate Statements

6

Governance
Figure 1

Governance Body

LIC Board of Directors (the Board)

Audit Finance & Risk

Committee

People & Culture

Committee

Climate governance and reporting

structure at LIC

LIC Board of Directors

The primary responsibility of the Board in relation to risk management is to ensure

that it develops a clear understanding of the fundamental risks inherent under LIC’s

business model and strategy, overseeing and holding management accountable and

setting appropriate risk appetite levels for LIC. As part of their governance duties,

our Board has visibility and oversight of sustainability and climate-related risks

and opportunities. The Board approves and is ultimately responsible for our overall

climate strategy, material initiatives, frameworks, targets, metrics, and policies.

The Board monitors progress against and oversees achievement of climate-related

metrics and targets. Governance responsibility in relation to climate has been kept at

the full Board level, although the Audit, Finance and Risk Committee (AFRC) oversees

elements of climate-related risk, and the People & Culture Committee has the

responsibility for the remuneration terms of the Chief Executive and oversees People

policies (for more information in relation to how metrics and targets are included

in remuneration policies, refer to the Metrics and Targets section of these Climate

Statements).

LIC’s commitment to managing the environmental impact of our products,

services, and work activities, enhancing our environmental performance and

achieving continual improvement, including in relation to our farmer shareholders,

is documented in an Environmental Policy, which is approved by the Board every

two years.

More information on our Board and Board committees can be found in our Annual

Report 2025

1

.

1

LIC’s Annual Reports are available at www.lic.co.nz/shareholders/financial-results-announcements

Management

LIC Senior Leadership Team (SLT) members with specific climate responsibilities

(refer to Table 2 for further detail). The Chief Executive reports to the Board, and

the other SLT members report to the Chief Executive.

Chief

Executive

Officer

Chief People

Officer (CPO)

Chief

Scientist

Chief Financial

Officer (CFO)

Other management roles with specific climate-related responsibility:

General

Counsel

(reports to

CFO)

Health, Safety

& Environment

Manager (reports

to CPO)

Senior

Environmental

Advisor (reports

to Health, Safety

& Environment

Manager)

Group Financial

Controller

(reports to CFO)

Representatives

from each LIC

business unit

(reporting lines

vary)

Environment & Sustainability Management Committee (ESMC),

also includes CPO & Chief Scientist (ESMC reports to the CPO)

For the year ended 31 May 2025

7

The Board’s oversight of climate-related risks and opportunities (Table 1):
Processes and frequency by which the Board

is informed about climate-related risks and

opportunities

During the reporting period, the Board met ten times, with three additional strategy days. Climate-related risks,

opportunities and/or reporting requirements were discussed at all of those meetings. The AFRC met eight times during

the reporting period. Climate-related risks and/or reporting requirements were discussed at seven of those meetings.

The Board has previously endorsed the approach of climate risk being a sub-category risk in LIC’s risk management tool

as it impacts more than one of LIC’s key risk areas. Updates on LIC’s key risk categories (including, where identified,

climate-related risks) are presented to at least three meetings per year of the Audit, Finance and Risk Committee. The

status (red/amber/green and a description of any issues) of material climate-related risks or opportunity initiatives

being focussed on during the reporting period is reported by management to the Board at every regular Board meeting

through an Environmental Management report and Enterprise Annual Plan report. Individual papers with project

proposals and funding requests are presented to Board as required under LIC’s Delegated Authority Policy. The

Environmental Management Report annually includes GHG metrics.

How the Board ensures that appropriate skills and

competencies are available to provide oversight

As part of the Director election process, skills are considered such as Sustainability on Farm, which includes climate

change expertise related to the dairy sector. Some Directors and members of management have also taken individual

responsibility for increasing their understanding of climate risk through attending relevant conferences and courses and

climate-related matters are being considered in planning Director development. New Directors during the reporting

period have been provided with separate induction sessions on climate risk management and disclosure reporting

requirements. Management have worked with the Board on ensuring that skills within the team and compliance

requirements are well understood.

The Board Chair and Chair of the People & Culture Committee work with the Chief People Officer on a forward program

of development for the Board and individual directors.

How the Board considers climate-related risks and

opportunities when developing and overseeing

implementation of strategy

LIC’s strategy is centred on breeding for a highly efficient, lower-emitting national dairy herd. Material climate-related

risk and opportunity initiatives are considered as part of the annual planning and budgeting process, including

Transition Plan initiatives (refer to page 28). Material climate-related risks and opportunities that have been identified

during the course of the year are discussed by the Board and the Board incorporates these discussions into strategic

planning by evaluating how climate-related risks and opportunities may impact LIC’s long-term business model,

financial performance and operational resilience. The Board engages with management to assess proposed mitigation

and adaptation strategies and to ensure that climate considerations are embedded into investment decisions, capital

allocation and enterprise risk management frameworks.

For example, this year’s capital spend included installation of a barn for measuring methane of lactating cows and

the Research and Development (R&D) operational budget included planned spend on climate-related opportunity

initiatives.

For further information in relation to LIC’s climate-related risk and opportunity initiatives, refer to section titled “climate-

related risks and decision making” in the strategy section of this climate statement.

LIC Climate Statements

8

How the Board sets, monitors progress and oversees
achievement of metrics and targets

LIC’s board sets the GHG emissions reduction targets and climate-related metrics for the company based on

recommendations made by management on what is considered achievable and what is useful to measure. Management

forecasts GHG emissions reductions based on initiatives underway and planned where it is known that reductions are

achievable and cost effective. Management identifies appropriate metrics by considering what is relevant to the dairy

sector and useful to measure.

GHG emissions target results and progress relative to the baseline year are presented to the Board annually by the Chief

People Officer and Health, Safety & Environment Manager and the Board discusses and sets further initiatives, metrics,

or targets that may be required based on those results and progress. Environmental Strategy, Transition Plan and

Energy Strategy documents, which are all foundation documents used for documenting and managing climate-related

risk and capitalising on climate-related opportunities, are also reviewed by the Board.

Progress on material climate-related risk and opportunity initiatives is reported to the Board at every regular meeting

by the Chief People Officer and Health, Safety & Environment Manager as part of an Environmental Management

Report and Enterprise Annual Plan traffic light report by the Chief Executive, giving the Board the opportunity to provide

feedback or request a change in approach.

During the reporting period the Board reviewed GHG emissions targets, approved updated GHG emissions targets and

discussed transition planning. Our metrics were reviewed and it was concluded that they remain fit for purpose.

For further information in relation to the metrics and targets that LIC currently has in place (including the results of the

review noted above) and whether these are incorporated into remuneration policies, refer to the metrics and targets

section of this climate statement.

For the year ended 31 May 2025

9

LIC Senior Leadership Team
Day-to-day management of risks and opportunities (including climate-related risks

and opportunities) within the Co-operative is delegated to members of LIC’s Senior

Leadership Team (SLT) and other senior leaders, as shown in Table 2 and Figure 2.

While the wider SLT monitors and discusses climate-related risks and opportunities

and endorses content to go to Board meetings, the members identified in Table 2

have specific responsibilities related to climate-related risks and opportunities.

The SLT meets fortnightly, with quarterly strategy offsites, and those meetings have

included consideration of a range of environmental topics throughout the reporting

period, including updates on climate-related risks and opportunities and related

initiatives, climate scenarios, climate statements, transition planning and review of

GHG emissions targets.

Management

The Environment and Sustainability Management Committee (ESMC) includes

two SLT representatives, meets quarterly and focusses on identifying and driving

environmental risks and opportunities for improvement across the business.

Any new climate-related risks identified within any business unit by management

can be integrated into LIC’s enterprise risk register after assessment and

endorsement by the Risk & Assurance Manager. Controls and/or mitigation

identification and material risks would then form part of management discussions,

with material risks included in AFRC reporting.

SLT members with specific climate-related responsibilities (Table 2):

Chief Executive• Responsible for managing and delivering the Co-op’s

strategy and performance

• Responsible for management of climate-related risks

and opportunities

• Attends all Board and sub-committee meetings

• Reports directly to the Board Chair – informal

discussions as frequently as needed

Chief People Officer• Oversees Environmental Policy, environment and

energy strategic plans, transition planning, GHG

data management

• Regular environment reporting to Board, including

the annual GHG emissions results, presenting any

proposed changes in the policy, strategy or GHG

emissions targets for approval

• Attends ESMC

• Attends People & Culture Committee

• Attend Board and AFRC meetings as required

Chief Scientist• Oversees climate-related R&D initiatives, presents to

the SLT and Board on material initiatives as required

• Attends ESMC

Chief Financial Officer• Oversees climate disclosure reporting and

sustainability reporting

• Considers financial implications of climate-related

risks and opportunities in financial planning, capital

allocation and financial reporting, including funding

requests raised by business units

• Oversees risk management, including climate-

related risks captured as recommended by Risk &

Assurance Manager and Group Financial Controller

• Attends all Board and AFRC meetings, including

presenting interim and full year financial statements

and climate statements for review and approval

LIC Climate Statements

10

Other management roles with climate-related responsibility (Figure 2):
Environment & Sustainability Management Committee (ESMC), also includes the Chief People Officer & Chief Scientist

General Counsel

Health, Safety &

Environment Manager

Senior Environmental AdvisorGroup Financial Controller

Representatives from each LIC

business unit

Oversees sustainability and

climate-related legal risk.

Attends all Board meetings and,

where required, attends sub-

committee meetings. Monitors

upcoming legislative change

and reports potential impacts to

AFRC.

Drives compliance with

environment legislation,

development and execution of

environment policy and strategy

to provide a framework for

managing climate-related risk,

oversees GHG reporting, Chairs

ESMC. Attends Board with CPO

to present any climate-related

environment papers.

Drafts, implements and

maintains environment policy,

transition planning, systems

and strategy, manages GHG

data gathering and reporting,

facilitates ESMC and works

with business unit members on

initiatives.

Oversees climate and

sustainability reporting,

considers financial implications

of climate-related risks and

opportunities in budgeting and

financial reporting. Together

with CFO, presents climate

statements to AFRC and Board.

Employees passionate about

driving continuous improvement

to reduce waste and reduce our

environmental impact, including

GHG emissions.

• LIC’s Transformation Office reporting tool enables centralised oversight of all relevant

environmental or sustainability initiatives, including key project milestones.

• LIC’s Investment Committee considers requests for funding and approves the internal emissions

price: business cases for initiatives are required to include any environmental considerations

and a monetary impact using the internal emissions price if GHG emissions are estimated to be

impacted by more than 10 tCO

2

-equivalent emissions per year.

• LIC’s R&D team includes scientists with relevant skills and experience working on climate-related

opportunities.

For the year ended 31 May 2025

11

Business Model
LIC is a New Zealand dairy farmer-owned co-

operative and LIC shares are listed on the NZX. To

be a shareholder in LIC, you must farm dairy cows in

New Zealand, supply a New Zealand milk processor

and buy a minimum amount of qualifying products

and services from LIC in any one year. As a farmer-

owned co-operative, all profit is returned to our farmer

shareholders in dividends or reinvested into new

solutions and research and development (R&D).

LIC’s headquarters are in the Waikato, along with

laboratories, herd testing facilities, a dairy farm and

bull farms. Additional bull farms are in the Central

North Island. Herd testing and Artificial Breeding

depots are located throughout the North and

South Islands, as well as herd testing facilities in

Christchurch.

LIC’s principal activities are carried out in New

Zealand, including artificial breeding products and

services, herd testing of milk samples, DNA testing,

animal health testing, herd management software,

on-farm support, sale of heat detection and animal

tag products and research and development (R&D).

The majority of LIC’s customers are dairy farmers,

or professionals such as vets providing our services

to dairy farmers. LIC is structured to best support

farmers and our operational teams to effectively

supply products and services to customers, which

results in a significant volume of vehicle travel to dairy

farms in rural areas. For semen production and R&D

purposes, LIC owns or utilises a large volume of bulls,

a dairy herd and trial animals.

LIC has smaller business operations in Australia, UK

and Ireland, mainly for the purpose of selling artificial

breeding products produced in New Zealand and

owns a small business that manufactures bovine heat

detection products in Australia.

Strategy

LIC Climate Statements

12

Strategy
The Board is responsible for setting the strategy of

LIC and monitoring delivery against that strategy,

recognising the Company’s economic, environmental

and social responsibilities. During the reporting period

the Board completed a check-in on LIC’s strategy

and emphasised the importance of our focus on herd

improvement, with five priority areas being focussed

on as key enablers of herd improvement (refer

Figure 3).

In terms of climate-related opportunities specifically,

herd improvement is at the heart of LIC’s strategy

and is LIC’s most significant opportunity for emissions

reduction, which will benefit the whole of the dairy

sector and New Zealand by enabling reduction in

emissions intensity.

Our three-year plan (which runs to 31 May 2028)

includes climate-related initiatives, some of which will

bring long-term genetic benefit, such as breeding

lower methane emitting dairy animals. Working with

dairy farmers, including via milk processors such

as Fonterra, to help farmers accelerate their herd

improvement to breed better cows faster is important

to help the sector to reduce its overall emissions

intensity. This can include using LIC services to

identify the best cows to breed from (eg herd testing

and DNA testing), using sexed semen to produce more

replacement cows from the best cows and, in the

future, being able to select lower methane-emitting

bulls for breeding decisions.

What's the

herd of the

future?

How we'll

breed it

faster

The role of

our people

Working with farmers to breed for that future herd now - using the best tools,

insights and genetics we can offer

Breeding

better cows

faster with:

Why this

matters

High-preforming herds

through world-class breeding

programmes

Smarter tools that connect data,

insights and systems farmers use

A generational co-operative

that's easy to work with

Our Strategy

Customer

experience

that makes LIC

easy to deal with

Genetics

that continue

to deliver value

on farm

Testing

to predict

performance and

health issues

Farm software

to make herd

and breeding

decisions easier

International

markets

to strengthen our

breeding scheme

With world leading herd improvement

Highly efficient,

producing more

from less

Aligned with the

needs of processors

and global markets

Lower-emitting and

environmentally

fit-for-purpose

LIC’s strategy on a page (Figure 3):

For the year ended 31 May 2025

13

LIC is running a number of long-term research trials, resulting in a significantly
higher volume of trial animals included in our biogenic emissions results compared

to our 2018/19 emissions base year. This will likely continue while there are still

opportunities identified to reduce emissions intensity through genetic improvement

requiring a R&D focus, or other areas of genetic improvement needed within the

dairy sector. As a result, it is uncertain if LIC’s own Scope 1 biogenic and farm-

related emissions will reduce while there remains a high need to hold additional

research animals, which in turn produce more emissions. LIC’s GHG emissions

reduction targets therefore exclude those emissions related to animals owned or

used, including for research purposes, by LIC. Improving genetics is a long game,

but we are confident that our initiatives will result in benefits to the sector and

New Zealand through cows that produce more milk solids with either the same or

less methane emissions, resulting in lower emissions-intensity, as well as breeding

options for animals that are more heat tolerant.

The Board has endorsed our climate-related strategic intent to transition

towards a low-GHG emission, climate-resilient economy, along with contributing

to decreasing methane emissions intensity from the national dairy herd. We are

committed to achieving this through the following objectives and priorities:

1. Reducing GHG emissions: reduce our carbon footprint by implementing

innovative technologies and sustainable practices across our operations.

2. Enhancing climate resilience: building resilience to climate impacts by

integrating climate risk assessments into our decision-making processes and

investing in adaptive infrastructure.

3. Driving innovation through R&D: enable enhancement of the genetic potential

and sustainability of the national dairy herd.

4. Capturing opportunities: leverage opportunities arising from the transition to a

low-carbon economy.

5. Avoiding adverse impacts: maintain transparent communication and engaging

with farmers to address their concerns.

6. Safeguarding the natural environment: protect and preserve natural

ecosystems on LIC properties by adopting sustainable resource management

practices and supporting biodiversity conservation initiatives.

By pursuing these objectives and priorities, we aim to contribute positively to New

Zealand’s climate goals while fostering sustainable growth and creating long-term

value for our farmer shareholders.

While LIC is committed to ongoing reduction of emissions, we recognise that new

technologies will be required to fully reduce our emissions based on methodologies

using SBTi (Science Based Target initiatives) tools, creating uncertainty around

how we will continue to reduce emissions by way of reduction or removal activities

without using some form of carbon credit offset in future. For example, much of

LIC’s vehicle travel is over long distances in rural areas; cost-effective feasible

alternatives to diesel-fuelled light trucks being made widely available across New

Zealand will be important.

LIC Climate Statements

14

Climate-related risks and opportunities and decision making
Climate-related risks fall into two main categories: physical and transition risks.

These have the potential to affect LIC’s entire business, including through the

impacts of those risks on our dairy farmer customers, and are taken into account

as an input to LIC’s internal capital deployment and funding decision-making

processes, along with climate-related opportunities, as described below.

Climate-related opportunities that result from the dairy sector needing to reduce

emissions intensity have been identified by the Board, SLT and other senior leaders

within the business through discussions with our farmer shareholders and milk

processors, strategic analysis and R&D.

LIC’s budget and annual plan for the following three years is coordinated annually

by the CFO. Each business unit has the opportunity to put forward funding requests

to be included in the three-year plan, which is then prioritised and agreed by the

SLT before being presented to the Board by the CFO and CE for approval. Any

funding requests for climate-related risk and opportunity initiatives is part of this

process. LIC has a Delegated Authority Policy which also outlines approval levels

required for unbudgeted funding requests outside of the annual plan process in the

event that a new or unforeseen climate-related risk or opportunity emerges.

Physical risk

Physical risk factors are those related to the impacts of the changing climate and

environment and can be further categorised as acute or chronic:

• Acute risk factors are those related to more frequent and intense extreme climate

events such as heatwaves, droughts, bushfires, floods and storms; and

• Chronic risk factors are those related to gradual changes in climatic conditions

such as increasing temperatures, changes in precipitation patterns and sea-

level rises.

Transition risk

Transition risk factors are those related to the process of transitioning towards a

climate-resilient and lower emissions society where transition pathways may vary

and can be further categorised as arising from these changes:

• Political changes, including policies and regulations, access to land, geopolitics

and food security changes impacting both the broad economy as well as those

impacting the dairy sector

• Economic changes, including access to banking and insurance services,

customer demand, energy security and carbon pricing

• Social changes, including labour force and consumer behaviour and preferences

• Technological changes, including developments in farming practices, food

production and energy/distribution; and

• Legal changes, including sustainability litigation.

The number of cows in the national herd is a key assumption considered as part of

LIC’s strategic planning process and underpins our expected five-year activity level

in relation to product sales. In addition, the biggest asset on LIC’s balance sheet is

our bull team. There is a complex, inter-related mix of factors impacting the number

of cows (including climate-related risks and opportunities), such as volatility of milk

price, farmers seeking to diversify their operations, changing land use, the high

cost of capital for new entrants and challenges with succession planning on farm.

Seasonal milk prices are a key assumption: a low milk price can generally result in

lower levels of activity with farmers seeking to reduce costs. The risk of low milk

price could be increased by climate-related factors, such as market or reputation

transition risk, but can also have an inverse relationship. Where weather conditions

contribute to global supply being lower than demand, milk price could be stronger.

LIC’s Investment Committee has also set an internal emissions price to be used as

a tool to calculate a financial impact when considering climate-related opportunity

or risk initiatives. The results factor into capital investment and funding decisions

to ensure that decarbonisation opportunities are considered in a similar way to any

other initiative. The financial analysis template LIC uses for considering costs and

benefits of proposed initiatives, including climate-related risks or opportunities,

has been updated to include a financial impact of GHG emissions reduction using

the internal emissions price. Where an initiative will change LIC’s Scope 1 or Scope 2

GHG emissions by more than 10 tCO

2

-equivalent per year, the business is required

to include a GHG monetary impact factor in the financial analysis calculated by

multiplying the change in emissions by the internal emissions price.

Previously LIC went through a process to identify the most material physical and

transition climate-related risks relevant to LIC and ensured that those risks were

included in LIC’s enterprise risk register, and the Board endorsed that climate-

related risk should be represented as a sub-category risk in LIC’s risk management

tool. This was on the basis that there are a range of different climate-related risks

that impact more than one of LIC’s key risk areas, enabling risk appetite for the

different types of climate risk to continue to be set for those overarching key risk

categories.

LIC’s material climate-related risks and opportunities are detailed on page 24.

For the year ended 31 May 2025

15

Current climate-related impacts
Current material climate-related physical impacts

While the effects of climate change are expected to intensify over the coming decades, a number of impacts are already being observed.

Impacts over and above historical seasonal weather variations are becoming more frequent, although not all climate events or impacts

experienced translate into material impacts for LIC.

ImpactDescription of impactCurrent financial impacts

Drought or dry summer

conditions

Early dry-off of cows assessed as being

likely in part due to dry conditions in some

areas. Early dry-off impacts LIC’s activity

levels, for example re-booking pressure or

cancelled herd testing of milk.

Cannot be quantified / no material financial impact.

It is not possible to identify lost revenue in the reporting period that is

specifically attributable to drought or summer conditions exacerbated by

climate change as farmers may have had multiple reasons for cancelling

a product or service, including the stock of additional feed on hand or the

cost of feed outweighing the benefits of extra days in milk. Overall, there

has not been a material financial impact as herd test revenue is higher

than the budget for the year.

Weather eventsExtreme weather events caused minor

disruption to LIC production and services

due to disrupted farmer operations,

resulting in some reorganisation of LIC

services. For example, South Island

flooding impacted some farmers during

the reporting period.

No material financial impact.

Weather events during the period were sufficiently temporary to not

materially impact LIC services provided on farm or result in a material

financial impact for LIC but are nevertheless material impacts in that they

indicate a trend of increasing volatility in weather and therefore have

an influence on LIC’s planning for its exposure to this risk on an ongoing

basis.

LIC has not made any material weather-related insurance claims during

the reporting period.

LIC Climate Statements

16

Current material climate-related transition impacts
ImpactDescription of impactCurrent financial impacts

Legislation and

regulation

• LIC is impacted by regulatory change and uncertainty in NZ relating to

climate policy, as well as general emissions reduction policies.

• Resources allocated to collate data, perform analysis, prepare and

review Climate Statements.

No material financial impact.

Efforts to reduce

LIC’s emissions or

reduce environmental

impact risk

• Ongoing transition of vehicles to electric vehicles (EVs) and hybrids to

further reduce LIC’s fuel emissions.

• Further additions to LIC EV charging station network.

• Ongoing discussions with suppliers to reduce waste, increase

recycling, improve efficiency and access to emissions data.

• Other asset replacements to reduce climate impacts.

• Resources allocated to prepare Transition Plan.

No material financial impact.

Not all costs are able to be separately

identified, such as electricity supply for EV

charging stations, change in costs solely

due to increased electrification of vehicle

fleet, employee time, which have been

partially offset by lower fuel costs and

power costs.

Investments in climate-

related research

Continued investment in climate-related opportunity research projects

to assist farmers to reduce emissions or adapt to climate change through

improved genetics in future, including methane validation trials, a new

barn and associated equipment for measuring methane from lactating

cows, and a heat tolerance breeding programme.

$3.4 million cost (excludes external funding,

includes both operational and capital

expenditure, does not include all employee

time).

For the year ended 31 May 2025

17

Scenario analysis
Scenario analysis is the process of exploring how an entity might perform under

a range of plausible futures. In a world of uncertainty, scenario analysis is meant

to challenge ‘business as usual’ assumptions. Climate-related scenario analysis

does not predict the future but rather provides a range of hypothetical outcomes

to enable an entity to better assess how physical and transition risks and

opportunities associated with climate change could impact its operations.

The Aotearoa Circle Agriculture Sector Scenarios

2

were previously used as LIC’s

foundation for developing climate-related scenarios. The sector scenario work

programmes led by the Aotearoa Circle were influential in bringing together sectors

across New Zealand to support climate reporting entities and encourage greater

comparability of reporting and key members of LIC’s executive team participated in

that process.

In the current reporting period we collaborated with Fonterra and Silver Fern

Farms to develop core scenario elements that were more specific to the dairy

and beef sectors and common across the three cooperatives, such as driving

forces, temperature outcomes, emissions pathways, and high-level narratives. In

particular, we moved away from using the description of ‘orderly’ transition in our

1.5°C scenario, noting that an orderly transition to limiting warming to 1.5°C above

pre-industrial levels seems increasingly unlikely. This joint output was then refined

by LIC to make it more specific to our strategy and business model.

LIC’s scenario analysis process involved engagement and governance at a number

of levels of the organisation:

• Delegation by the Board and SLT to the Group Financial Controller and Senior

Environmental Advisor to work with Fonterra and Silver Fern Farms to collaborate

on developing scenarios;

• Analysis and input by management to the collaboration with Fonterra and Silver

Fern Farms;

• Updates to impact pathways and analysis of them to identify potential

climate related risks and impacts on LIC, as well as to identify climate-related

opportunities (noting that SLT and the Board were involved in developing the

previous impact pathways);

• Review and feedback of the scenarios and impact pathways by other

management representatives across the business, including the Senior

Environmental Advisor and the Risk & Assurance Manager;

• Presentation of the draft scenarios, climate related risks and opportunities

identified to both SLT and the Board for review and discussion; and

• Final endorsement of outputs by the Board.

Other than the collaboration with Fonterra and Silver Fern Farms, LIC did not enlist

the help of external partners, and no external stakeholders were involved, with

the exception of elected directors, who are farmer shareholders in LIC. No specific

modelling was undertaken as part of the scenario analysis.

LIC determined that the scenario results (ie our chosen scenarios below) following

adaptation of the collaboration with Fonterra and Silver Fern Farms was the most

relevant and appropriate scenarios because they have been created specifically

for the dairy sector within New Zealand’s agricultural sector and therefore will be

most useful for identifying and assessing the most material risks and opportunities

relevant to LIC, its operations, business model, and strategy and have been further

adapted to be specific to our strategy and business model. The scenarios were also

aligned to the temperature requirements in NZ CS 1, including to have a 1.5 degree

scenario, a 3 degree or greater scenario, and a third climate-related scenario:

• Sharp Corrections, temperature rise limited to 1.5°C (mandated)

• Slow Followers, temperature rise over 2.5°C

• Hothouse, temperature rise increases past 3°C (mandated)

Scenario narratives

Climate-related scenario narratives are plausible, challenging descriptions of

how the future may unfold and provide the parameters in which an entity conducts

scenario analysis to test overall strategic resilience based on a coherent and

internally consistent set of assumptions about key driving forces and relationships

covering both physical and transition risks in an integrated manner. Climate-

related scenarios are not intended to be probabilistic or predictive, or to identify

the ‘most likely’ outcome(s) of climate change. They are intended to provide an

opportunity for entities to develop their internal capacity to better understand

and prepare for the uncertain future impacts of climate change. Accordingly, all

outcomes described in our climate-related scenarios are only insights to assist

in resilience testing and strategy development and are not predictions of actual

future outcomes.

2

The Aotearoa Circle Agriculture Sector Scenarios

LIC Climate Statements

18

Scenario narratives are determined by the interaction of key political, economic,
social, technological, legal and environmental ‘drivers of change’ (collectively

referred to as the PESTLE framework) that may influence an entity’s operating

environment. These narratives include assumptions and logical relationships to

help identify potential impacts and severity of the impacts, on operations, strategy,

and financial planning.

LIC has adapted the narratives developed with Fonterra and Silver Fern Farms

to reflect LIC’s role in the dairy sector specifically, which was completed by

management and reviewed and endorsed by both SLT and the Board. This has

been a standalone process, although the LIC strategy check-in was completed

at the same time and LIC’s most material climate-related risk and opportunity is

at the heart of the updated strategy: enabling dairy farmers to reduce emissions

intensity within the national dairy herd in the face of a decreasing cow population.

Table 3 summarises the three scenario narratives and the key assumptions

underlying each.

These scenarios are designed intentionally to be challenging and are not meant to

be perceived as ‘most likely’ outcomes, nor do they reflect LIC’s strategic beliefs or

anticipated views of the future.

Scenario assumptions and narratives – Table 3

Sharp CorrectionsSlow FollowersHothouse

SummaryThe Sharp Corrections scenario depicts a world

where policy action on climate is delayed until a

severe natural disaster near 2030 shifts public

opinion, leading to a swift and robust response

to limit global warming to 1.5°C by 2100. Co-

ordinated global efforts drive technological

advances however the abrupt policy changes are

a strain on emissions-intensive sectors. This is a

costly, disruptive transition.

The Slow Followers scenario is a future where the

world is divided on climate policy, with varying

levels of ambition among countries. Global efforts

are insufficient to limit warming to 1.5°C, with

temperatures set to rise over 2.5°C by century’s

end. The EU and China adopt aggressive policies,

while New Zealand lags, making slower progress,

leading to reputational damage. New Zealand’s

transition is ultimately driven by economic factors

that favour positive climate action.

The Hothouse scenario depicts a world where

unchecked emissions and lack of climate

policies lead to a rise in global temperatures of

3.6°C above pre-industrial levels by 2100. The

physical impacts of climate change are severe

and irreversible. Paris Agreement targets are

abandoned by 2035, leading to protectionism

and mass food production. Adaptation to climate

change is the priority, not mitigation.

Key climate

scenarios

architecture

pathways used

3

• IPCC SSP1 ‘Taking the Green Road’, RCP 1.9

• NGFS ‘Sudden Wake Up Call’ & ‘Net Zero

Emissions’

• SPANZ ‘100% Smart’

• Climate Change Commission 2021 dataset

(CCC) ‘Further Behaviour Change’ and

‘Tailwinds’

• IPCC SSP2 ‘Middle of the Road’, RCP 4.5

• NGFS ‘Low Policy Ambition’ & ‘Fragmented

World’

• SPANZ ‘Kicking & Screaming’

• CCC ‘Headwinds’

• IPCC SSP3 ‘Regional Rivalry’, RCP 7.0

• NGFS ‘Diverging Realities’ & ‘Current Policies’

• SPANZ ‘Unspecific Pacific’

• CCC ‘Current Policy Reference’

Temperature

outcome by 2100

1.5°C2.7°C3.6°C

3

Refer to Appendix One for further detail

For the year ended 31 May 2025

19

Sharp CorrectionsSlow FollowersHothouse
Time horizonShort (to 2027/28), medium (2027-2035), long (2036-2050) and very long (2051-2100) term, with 2100 being the endpoint for each scenario

Physical risk

severity compared

to today

Low to moderateModerate to high Extreme

Transition risk

severity compared

to today

Low then highModerateLow

• Policy

reaction

• Delayed then blunt• Slow and lagging in NZ, varied globally• No new policies to drive emissions reductions

• Technology

advancements

• Slow then fast changes• Moderate• Slow changes

• Consumer

behaviour change

• Slow then fast changes• Regionally differentiated (maintains

momentum in EU, rapid in China, slow in US)

• Slow changes

• Demand for dairy• Increased demand for alternatives to bridge

gap left by dairy destocking

• Similar to today; locally produced dairy

alongside alternatives

• High demand for low-cost nutrition, with dairy

out of reach of many budgets

Scope of operations The climate scenario analysis was focused on LIC’s New Zealand operations. International factors were considered where material, such as consumables

manufactured offshore or shipping of product sold to international markets.

Dairy herd impact –

critical assumption/

uncertainty

• 30% smaller dairy herd than 2020 by 2050• 17% smaller dairy herd than 2020 by 2050• 13% smaller dairy herd than 2020 by 2050

LIC Climate Statements

20

Sharp CorrectionsSlow FollowersHothouse
Policy &

Socioeconomic

assumptions

• As the physical impacts of climate change

become apparent, from 2030 governments

around the world, including NZ, implement

aggressive policies to curb emissions.

• Dairy farmers are required to adopt methane-

reducing technologies, and dairy herd sizes

are required to reduce to meet methane caps.

• From the 2030s stricter environmental policies

on nitrogen limits, supplementary feeds,

and fertilisers are enforced, while genetic

modification regulations relax to allow novel

climate solutions.

• There is a significant shift in diets away

from animal-based proteins toward readily

available plant-based and lab-grown

alternative proteins from the early 2030s

and consumers are unable to access scale,

affordable animal proteins following sharp

action on methane.

• There is moderate ambition to decarbonise

globally, with emissions peaking around 2040.

The world is not on track to reach net zero this

century and many countries remain reliant on

fossil fuels to power their development. As it

becomes clear that Paris Agreement targets

will not be met, global policies diverge.

• NZ climate policy lags global peers and NZ

is perceived as a slow follower in the global

fight against climate change. From 2050,

international pressure gradually pushes NZ to

prioritise emissions reductions.

• Trade agreements are established between

countries that are committed to transitioning

to low-carbon economies and trade

relationships are dominated by power blocs.

• Dairy remains a key part of most global diets,

albeit with plant-based and insect protein

alternatives also available and by 2040 some

novel alternatives emerging.

• Global government priorities change from

sustainability to food and energy security,

with Paris Agreement targets largely

abandoned by 2035. While existing policies

remain in place, at least in the near term,

limited additional measures are enacted

and proposed policies are placed on hold or

substantially weakened.

• Certain sustainability-related regulations

are relaxed as a means of the government

reducing pressures on farming communities.

• Significant dietary change occurs as people

become open to cheaper, new proteins

(e.g. lab-grown dairy, insects, plant-based).

Traditional dairy becomes a luxury.

• From late 2030s, geopolitical tensions

and hostilities rise in response to resource

scarcity, leading to greater border controls

and trade barriers. Heightened civil unrest

and widespread conflicts occur in relation to

immigration, resource allocation and water

availability, disrupting supply chains.

Macro-

economic trends

• Insurance and financing is increasingly only

easily accessible for organisations that show

strong sustainability credentials and climate

resilience.

• From 2030, there is strong demand from

customers for dairy suppliers with aggressive

emissions reductions targets and credible

transition plans.

• Agricultural emissions are now priced, leading

to large-scale destocking as farmers struggle

with the cost of capital and continuing

operations.

• Financing and insurance are increasingly

expensive and sometimes impossible to

access for those exposed to high climate risks

(like many dairy farms and companies) and/or

not reducing emissions.

• Customer demand is divided, with some

developed country customers demanding

dairy products with sustainability credentials

while others prioritise functionality and cost.

• Insurance premiums continue to rise or

insurance is increasingly hard to access;

for some hard-hit areas, insurance is not

available. Self-insurance becomes common.

• While the demand for dairy protein continues

to grow, there is a noticeable shift in focus

from quality, sustainability, and traceability to

quantity.

For the year ended 31 May 2025

21

Sharp CorrectionsSlow FollowersHothouse
Energy pathways• Energy availability remains stable in NZ, with

hydroelectric power levels adequate and

increased investment in new technology.

• The NZ Government disincentivises and in

some cases prohibits the use of fossil fuels and

accelerates policy to phase-out natural gas.

• In NZ, companies that chose to transition

early despite little upfront incentive retain a

relatively stable energy supply while those

that did not face high costs and limited supply.

• There is a lack of coordinated international

policy to support a net-zero transition, with

fossil fuel resources continuing to be exploited.

• Energy sector supply chains suffer disruption

due to climate impacts and energy prices

surge due to the continued global demand for

fossil fuels and increasing capacity concerns

at NZ’s hydro stations, which are frequently

affected by drought.

Carbon

sequestration

and afforestation

• The government prioritises carbon reduction

through afforestation initiatives.

• Focus on emissions reductions leads to large

areas of pine monocultures. Rushed and costly

global push for more carbon capture and

storage tech, though not really seen in NZ.

• Little use of carbon capture and storage

globally due to cost. Pines continue to be

planted for timber in New Zealand, but native

forestry is not incentivised.

Nature

based solutions

• Tougher resource consents for water, land,

and farming on peatland were introduced,

placing severe limits on dairying in some

regions.

• There is increased demand for nature-related

credentials, biodiversity and nature-related

reporting from the 2030s.

• There is limited emphasis on nature-based

solutions in the dairy sector due to the

reliance on fossil fuels and slower transition to

sustainable development.

• Adaptation is the priority.

• Tighter biosecurity controls are implemented

to limit the influx of pests and diseases

associated with warming.

Technology

assumptions,

including negative

emissions

technology

• Technology innovation to help dairy

farmers optimise resource use and improve

productivity are subsidised and supported

by large food companies and public sector

investment by 2030s, aiming to reduce

on-farm emissions and keep dairy farms

profitable at lower stocking rates.

• Government and private sector investment

in methane inhibitor development is limited in

the 2020s, then increases rapidly from 2030

as the world’s focus turns to methane. By 2040

methane inhibitors are cost effective and

accessible to most farmers.

• The government unlocks gene-editing policy

and invests in R&D to develop climate-resilient

crops and livestock, to be deployed on farm in

the 2030s.

• From the 2030s food companies invest in

precision agriculture technologies to help

farmers optimise resource use and improve

productivity in the face of increasingly

challenging climactic conditions. There is

limited government funding available for

these technologies.

• NZ R&D includes gene editing/modification

and is focussed on breeding more resilient,

regenerative pasture and dairy animals,

particularly from the 2040s as climate impacts

become more severe.

• New interest and investment in sustainable

dairy farming dries up. Capital and resources

are redirected into adaptation.

• There is an increased focus on breeding to

encourage growth and improve the climate

resiliency of the national dairy herd, with

a heavier use of steroids, antibiotics and

genetic modification considered acceptable

to maintain milk production.

• Investments in on-farm research and

technology continue, shifting from emissions

reduction tools to climate resilience and

adaptation interventions.

LIC Climate Statements

22

Scenario analysis insights
LIC’s analysis of climate-related risks and opportunities through building out

impact pathways using drivers of change found varying degrees of impact on the

co-op across the three scenarios and time horizons. The above narratives are

intended to bring to life the critical uncertainties in how LIC’s operating context

could evolve over time under possible futures, by describing relevant narratives

and comparing them across scenarios, with the most significant factor being the

potential impact of climate change on the size of the national dairy herd.

While the scenarios are shaped by global and New Zealand scenario methods

and assumptions, which make specific assumptions about how the context will

evolve, they are still qualitative and exploratory in nature. Climate scenarios are

not predictive, they are not forecasts, nor do they represent any preferred options.

Rather, they test a broad range of plausible and challenging outcomes to generate

useful insights on potential climate risks, threats and opportunities.

Our key findings in each scenario are as follows:

• In a Sharp Corrections scenario, LIC would be particularly exposed to transition

risks given the scale and pace of change required to reduce emissions in the

short to medium term, with the most significant outcome explored in the narrative

for LIC being a 30% smaller dairy herd than 2020 by 2050.

• A Slow Followers scenario represents a more volatile and uncertain operating

context for LIC, with a potential reduction in the dairy herd of 17% by 2050

(as compared to 2020). In this scenario, a slow approach by others to reduce

emissions would mean the Co-operative’s ability to maintain profitability in

the face of transition changes would be challenging due to rapidly increased

operating and capital costs, particularly as greater exposure to physical risks

are experienced with higher global temperature increases by this point and

beyond to 2100.

• In a Hothouse scenario, although the dairy herd may have had a smaller

reduction by 2050 of 13% (as compared to 2020), LIC and dairy farmers would

be particularly exposed to the physical risks of climate change by this point and

beyond to 2100 given New Zealand’s reliance on a stable, temperate climate

for dairy farming. Unfavourable climate conditions under this scenario could

challenge the productivity of our pasture-based system without significant

farmer adaptation and our ability to access farms to provide critical services

could be severely disrupted by major weather events.

We will continue to develop our climate scenario analysis to help inform strategy

over time.

Sharp CorrectionsSlow FollowersHothouse

Data sources for

each scenario

Data sources for each scenario can be found at Appendix One

For the year ended 31 May 2025

23

Climate-related risks and opportunities
LIC’s material climate-related risks and opportunities and the anticipated impacts

that we currently consider we can reasonably expect over time are detailed in

Tables 4 and 5. Management used the insights from the above scenarios to update

impact pathways specific to LIC and review the risks previously identified in FY24.

The anticipated impacts are described in qualitative terms and linked to a series of

risk responses and/or mitigations.

The time horizons LIC considers for strategic planning and capital deployment

and the time horizons that LIC used to assess its climate-related risks and

opportunities are:

• Short-term – risk over the next 3 years to 2027/28, in line with LIC’s three-year

plan cycle

• Medium-term – risk within the horizon from 2028 to 2035

• Long-term – risk within the time horizon from 2036 to 2050 and beyond

Global population growth is a critical assumption in relation to the dairy sector,

with an indirect potential impact on LIC products and services – growth in demand

for dairy could reduce the risk of a decrease in NZ’s cow population. Shared

Socioeconomic Pathways

4

(SSP) developed for differing climate scenarios suggest

that the global population could continue to grow until at least 2050 and, with

increasing focus on healthy food options, the global demand for dairy will also likely

increase, albeit with the risk of increasing demand for non-animal products.

Although we expect that the national dairy herd could continue to decline, LIC’s

products and services have become more important and relevant than ever to

ensure that farmers can keep increasing productivity on farm with less cows,

and those cows need to be more emissions efficient. We expect that demand for

some LIC products and services will increase, such as animal health testing given

the importance of animal welfare under nature-based principles and to ensure

optimum, healthy efficient animals.

Climate-related risks – Table 4

RiskRisk DescriptionRisk typeTime horizonAnticipated impactsStrategic mitigations

Government

policy and

regulations

Actions could be taken to constrain

emissions-intensive activities,

including:

• de-stocking or land use regulation

• farmgate emissions pricing

• additional tax on emissions-heavy

inputs (e.g. fuel)

TransitionMedium

Long

• Reduction in cows or farmer

profitability could lead to reduced

LIC revenue

• Potential for climate-related

litigation as a result of climate

activism

• Increased costs related to

compliance and farmgate emissions

pricing

• Monitor regulatory change

• Continue to participate in policy

consultations

• Continue to promote importance of

herd improvement

• Collaboration on R&D methane

reduction programme

• Taking action to reduce LIC’s

emissions, Farm Environment Plans

for LIC farms

4

SSP Database (Shared Socioeconomic Pathways) Scenario Explorer

LIC Climate Statements

24

RiskRisk DescriptionRisk typeTime horizonAnticipated impactsStrategic mitigations
InnovationEmerging technology and R&D to

enable a lower-carbon industry

creates a challenge to keep up with

the rate of global change, risk that

novel technology development fails to

deliver or is not affordable to LIC

TransitionMedium

Long

• Cost of adopting could reduce

farmer profitability, which could lead

to reduced LIC revenue

• Risk of falling behind in innovation if

LIC is not a fast follower

• Potential for insufficient innovation

to support achievement of

aspirational climate targets and

timeframes

• Increasing technology costs,

particularly in relation to rapidly

growing data

• LIC continues to invest heavily in

R&D and IT development

• Monitor both NZ and global

innovation progress

• Work cooperatively on agricultural

emissions reductions with others in

the sector

• LIC Strategy check-in during the

reporting period – updates are

centred around herd improvement

Market and

reputation

Shifts in supply and demand as

consumer preferences change,

regardless of population growth,

including increased use of non-

animal products, market access and

reputation risk if dairy farmers do not

achieve emissions intensity reductions

TransitionMedium

Long

• Reduction in farmer profitability

could lead to reduced LIC revenue

• Potential for carbon border

adjustments could reduce farmer

profitability, which could lead to

reduced LIC revenue

• Working closely with milk processors

to promote herd improvement

importance

• Continue to report sustainability

performance and climate

disclosures

• R&D initiatives (eg breeding for

methane reduction and heat

tolerance)

Decrease in

viability of dairy

farms & sector

Potential for decrease in productivity

and output of the dairy sector due

to changes in mean rainfall and

temperature, seasonality, weather

extremes. Impact of heat stress or

changes in the distribution of invasive

species and diseases increasing

animal health issues

Physical Medium

Long

• Early dry-off of cows due to

drought can result in LIC service

cancellations, such as herd testing

• Reduction in number of cows, farmer

profitability or cancelled services

could lead to reduced LIC revenue

• Increasing challenge for both LIC

and farmers to secure financing and

insurance, increase in cost

• Serving remote areas where dairy

is less viable in future may become

unprofitable leading to reduced LIC

revenue from those sources

• Continue to promote importance of

herd improvement

• R&D investment, including improving

animal heat tolerance, and data

integration investment

• Taking action to reduce LIC’s

emissions

• Continued review of crisis plans and

annual crisis simulations

• Continue to report sustainability

performance and share with

banking and insurance partners

For the year ended 31 May 2025

25

RiskRisk DescriptionRisk typeTime horizonAnticipated impactsStrategic mitigations
Supply chain

and distribution

disruption

Increasing frequency and severity of

extreme weather events impacting

LIC’s supply chain, which may result in

a major business disruption, increased

operating costs and/or an inability to

meet customer requirements

PhysicalMedium

Long

• Reduction in farmer profitability and/

or disrupted services could lead to

reduced LIC revenue

• Flight cancellations during artificial

insemination peak season would

have a material NZ dairy sector

impact

• Increased shipping and airfreight

costs of supplies and overseas

distribution, challenges with getting

international product to market on a

timely basis

• LIC mitigates supplier risk where

possible by advance ordering and

delivery of critical consumables, at

least a year in advance for inputs

used in peak season products and

services, supplies of back-up frozen

semen straws

• Crisis and business continuity

planning

Road access,

electricity and/

or water supply

disruption

Extreme weather events could result

in more frequent and lengthy road

closures, power outages and water

supply, as well as potential restrictions

due to drought

PhysicalMedium

Long

• Reduction in farmer profitability and/

or disrupted services could lead to

reduced LIC revenue

• Lengthy road closures could impact

time-critical on-farm services,

particularly artificial insemination

• Increased cost of electricity/water

leading to higher overhead costs for

LIC

• Installation of solar panels,

together with battery systems, and

generators to support continuation

of critical services during and

following extreme weather events

• Crisis and business continuity

planning

PeopleHealth impacts for some LIC workers

and in the dairy sector generally from

exposure to more extreme weather,

potential for increased heat stress

Physical Medium

Long

• Dairy sector may become less

attractive to work in

• Heat stress risk included in health

and safety policy and procedures for

relevant business units

• Continue sponsorship and support

of sector, including dairy industry

awards

LIC’s material risks relate to the dairy sector and New Zealand, unless stated otherwise above.

LIC Climate Statements

26

Climate-related opportunities – Table 5
OpportunityOpportunity descriptionTypeTime horizonsAnticipated impactsSpecific initiatives

The power

of herd

improvement

Increased use of premium genetics,

DNA, animal health and milk testing

by farmers to identify and maximise

productive and healthy animals and

reduce emissions intensity of dairy

animals in the national herd.

Potential for change in regulations in

relation to gene editing and cloning to

provide more R&D opportunity.

TransitionShort

Medium

Long

• The results some farmers are

achieving show that if we continue

to sharpen our focus on herd

improvement, we can reduce

intensity of emissions

• Potential to increase LIC revenue

to help offset reductions related to

decrease in cow numbers

• Farmer shareholder engagement

on how LIC can improve herd

productivity and reduce emissions

intensity

• R&D initiatives, including current

methane emissions reduction

breeding programme in

collaboration with CRV and Pāmu,

with funding to date from the

NZ Agricultural Greenhouse Gas

Research Centre

• Working closely with milk processors

to promote herd improvement

importance

Reduce use

of natural

mating bulls

Where dairy farmers increasingly

solely use artificial breeding there is

the opportunity to reduce the number

of NZ natural mating bulls

TransitionShort

Medium

• Reduced emissions from less natural

mating bulls

• Potential for LIC to increase sales,

particularly through use of Short

Gestation Length (SGL) product

• Increased use of SGL will result in

additional days of milk for farmers,

which improves emissions intensity

per kg of milk solids

• Farmer shareholder engagement

on how LIC can improve herd

productivity and reduce emissions

intensity

Improve heat

tolerance of

dairy animals

Heat stress has significant welfare

implications for animals. For dairy

cows it can also impact feed intake,

milk production, fertility, and calf birth

weight. Introducing the ‘slick’ (heat

tolerant) gene into the country’s dairy

herd could allow for a significant

improvement in dairy cow heat

tolerance in hotter temperatures over

the long term

PhysicalMedium

Long

• Increased heat resilience of the

national dairy herd over time

• Potential for new LIC international

sales in the longer-term

• R&D heat tolerant breeding initiative

Increase

genetics inter-

national sales

Where pastoral-based systems

become more cost effective in other

countries, NZ genetics can be seen as

more attractive

Transition

Physical

Short

Medium

Long

• Potential to increase LIC’s

proportion of international revenue

• Monitor international markets

and work with our distributors on

opportunities to increase genetics

sales offshore

LIC’s material opportunities relate to the dairy sector and New Zealand, unless stated otherwise above.

For the year ended 31 May 2025

27

Transition planning
During the reporting period LIC has put a Transition Plan in place to record how

LIC’s business model and strategy will change to address its climate-related risks

and opportunities. LIC’s business model and strategy is not currently anticipated to

change but aspects of how we will continue to implement our strategy to respond

to the identified climate-related risks and opportunities will change as described in

the summary of key aspects of that Transition Plan and progress made during the

reporting period is included in Figure 4.

Material components of the transition plan out to 2050 are summarised in Figure 5.

Decisions about capital deployment and funding for climate-related risk and

opportunity initiatives (including those within the Transition Plan) are considered as

part of the annual planning and budgeting process within each relevant business

unit. Initiatives with a material one-off spend are considered by Investment

Committee and Board where required under LIC’s Delegated Authorities Policy.

Refer to page 15 for more information of how this works in practice.

Key aspects of LIC’s transition planning and progress during the reporting period (Figure 4):

PrinciplesAmbitionActionAccountability

Disclosure

Elements

FoundationsImplementation strategyEngagement strategyMetrics & targetsGovernance

Sub-elements

Board completed strategy

check-in, resulting in

increased focus on herd

improvement to breed

lower-emitting dairy cows,

which is the most material

contribution LIC can make

to an economy-wide

transition to a low emissions,

climate-resilient future

state and to address LIC’s

climate-related risks and

opportunities

• Transition Plan,

Environment &

Sustainability Strategy

and Energy Strategy are

in place and have been

shared internally with LIC

employees

• LIC’s dairy farm and

bull farms have Farm

Environment Plans

• Refer to Figure 5 for

material actions planned

out to 2050

Engagement with:

• Milk processors

and farmers on

herd improvement

opportunities

• Sector scenario analysis

• Suppliers on improving

sustainability

• Employees – education,

regular newsletters,

annual survey and

options to engage

• Scope 1 & 2 GHG

emissions reduction

targets were reset out

to 2035

• Regular Environment

reporting to Board is

in place

• Climate disclosure

reporting sessions held

with new directors

• Transition planning

and GHG target setting

presentations to Board

LIC Climate Statements

28

LIC’s transition to low-carbon future timeframe – material actions (Figure 5):
2050

Our energy

Our farms

Our transport

Our people and

suppliers

Today

2027

2031

2035

•LIC-owned sites self-reliant on

clean energy

•Solar installed where possible on

leased properties*

•75% LIC-owned sites self-reliant on

clean energy

•Solar installed where possible on

leased properties*

•Reticulated gas removed

•50% LIC-owned sites

self-reliant on clean energy

•Solar installed where

possible on leased

properties*

•Further solar panel

installation on owned

buildings

•Consider options for leased

properties*

Short Term

Medium Term

Medium-long Term

Long Term

•Optimise practices on LIC

farms: e.g. planting, low/no

till practices, fertiliser &

effluent use, rainwater

capture

•Methane and heat

tolerance research

•Optimise practices on LIC

farms

•Lower methane and heat

tolerant LIC breeding

options become

commercially available

•Optimise practices on LIC farms

•Evidence of lower methane emitting

animals in national herd from breeding

•Increased heat tolerant genetics in LIC

bulls and growing in national herd

•Optimise practices on LIC farms

•Significant increase in lower methane

emitting animals in national herd from

breeding

•Increased heat tolerant genetics in

national herd

•Continue to move vehicle

fleet to EV and hybrid

options, reduce fleet

where possible

•All small passenger vehicles

are EV or hybrid

•Trial hydrogen/diesel light

truck option

•Majority of LIC vehicles are powered

by clean energy sources**

•Low-emission air travel**

*Dependent on external parties

**Requires novel technologies to be proven and cost-effective

•Transition fleet light trucks to

hydrogen fuelled option**

•Support and encourage

employees to transition to

low-carbon options, e.g.

providing free EV and bike

charging on site

•Work with suppliers on

improving sustainability*

•Support and encourage

employees to transition to

low-carbon options

•Work with suppliers on

improving sustainability*

•Support and encourage employees to

transition to low-carbon options

•Work with suppliers on improving

sustainability*

•Support and encourage employees to

transition to low-carbon options

•Work with suppliers on improving

sustainability*

For the year ended 31 May 2025

29

Risk Management
As a pasture-based dairy co-operative, the importance of identifying and

managing impacts of weather patterns that have the potential to drive financial

and strategic impacts on our business has long been part of our business practices.

Regular assessment of potential impacts of climate-related risk is part of our

forecasting quarterly, or as needed, as well as during annual business continuity

plan reviews for assessing available resilience options for our business.

Refer to the Strategy section for detail on the scenario analysis process and the

time horizons LIC considers for strategic planning and to assess its climate-related

risks and opportunities.

The AFRC, on behalf of the Board, is responsible for ensuring that management has

established a risk management framework that includes policies and procedures

to effectively identify, mitigate and monitor key enterprise risks. The AFRC regularly

reviews LIC’s key enterprise risks and receives risk updates at AFRC meetings.

Risk owners review risks at least annually to check that they are still relevant,

appropriately risk-assessed and to review the control and mitigations in place.

LIC’s Risk Management Policy sets our approach to risk management. LIC is

committed to a proactive approach to the identification, quantification and

management of risk and has implemented a structured risk management

framework to assist management and the Board to identify, manage and mitigate

key enterprise-wide risks. Once identified, risks are captured in an online tool,

assessed using a combination of the likelihood and consequence of the risk

occurring and controls and key risk indicators identified. Risks are reviewed

and controls self-assessed at least annually, or as needed, and internal audit

reviews are completed on key controls on a rotating basis over time. LIC also

has a separate Legislative Compliance Policy under which potential and actual

legislation and regulation changes are monitored and changes material to LIC are

reported to AFRC at least annually.

In 2023, we used the National Climate Change Risk Assessment for Aotearoa

New Zealand

5

to identify the most material physical climate risks relevant to LIC.

We also considered the climate-related transitional risks as defined in NZ CS 3. We

cross-referenced those risks to LIC’s risk register and identified any gaps where

risks needed to be added to the register. Most of the risks were found to already be

covered within existing risks. Climate transition or physical risk was added as a sub-

category to those risks to be able to separately report on climate-related risks from

the risk register. LIC also has a separate health & safety risk register, which includes

people-specific climate-related health risks for sub-business unit areas, such as the

risk of heat stress.

The Board endorsed that climate risk would be a sub-category risk in LIC’s risk

management tool as it impacts more than one of LIC’s key risk areas, enabling risk

appetite for the different types of climate risk to continue be set for those over-

arching key risk categories. All categories of risks are considered equally and using

a sub-category for climate-related risks means the appropriate risk appetite for

an overall risk category can be consistently applied to different types of climate-

related risk.

As part of the scenario analysis process, high level impact pathways developed in

relation to climate-related physical and transition risks helped to identify potential

impacts and opportunities specific to LIC. No material parts of the value chain were

specifically excluded for the purposes of scenario analysis and the identification of

climate-related risks and opportunities.

LIC runs a crisis simulation exercise at least annually and scenarios have included

major weather events or power outages materially affecting our operations.

The results of these exercises are reported to AFRC and help further assess the

potential impacts and/or support proactive changes to strengthen resilience.

Global megatrends and emerging risks are monitored on an ongoing basis by

management and the Risk & Assurance team, reported to the Board and AFRC and

are used to review key risks identified.

Further detail on the components of LIC’s risk framework is outlined in Table 6,

including how climate-related risk is integrated into the components.

5

National climate change risk assessment for New Zealand - Main report | Ministry for the Environment

LIC Climate Statements

30

Integration of climate risk within LIC’s risk management framework – Table 6
LIC StrategyLIC’s strategic direction is set by the Board and implemented by the SLT, including consideration and management of

climate-related risks and opportunities.

Risk Management PolicyLIC’s Risk Management Policy sets our approach to risk management and risk appetite settings across ten key

categories: Health & Safety, Disruption to Product or Service, Brand Damage, Compliance Risk, Financial Risk,

Bio-Security & Animal Health, Market Disruption, Strategic Risk, People & Capability and Information Security Risk.

Climate-related risks are a sub-category across these categories. This policy is reviewed at least every two years and

was reviewed within this reporting period.

Risk AppetiteThe Board sets risk appetite for LIC’s key risk categories, enabling risk appetite in relation to different types of

climate-related risk to still be set based on the overall category of risk. For example, LIC’s Board has set a low-risk

appetite for Compliance risk, which includes non-compliance with climate and environment related legislation and

regulation. Disruption to Product or Service risk appetite is set for low risk during LIC’s Artificial Breeding peak season,

which includes disruption from weather events, resulting in concentrated crisis and business continuity planning for a

potential event during peak season.

Risk management toolsLIC uses a digital tool to manage risk and internal audit points. Climate-related physical and transition risk are

used as risk sub-categories. Another digital tool is used for managing health & safety and environment regulation

compliance risk, including heat stress risk, and our environmental aspects register is also being transferred to this tool.

Controls and actions resulting from reviews, audits or events are also tracked in these tools. Critical LIC processes are

documented in a Business Impact Assessment, LIC has a crisis management framework, runs at least annual crisis

simulations and all business units have business continuity plans and health & safety plans. Risks are updated for any

known changes or reviewed at least annually.

Risk assessment and

prioritisation

Each risk is assessed using a combination of the likelihood and consequence of the risk occurring under a risk matrix

framework. The combination of likelihood and consequence results in a low, medium, high or extreme risk rating. An

assessment is done for both the inherent risk and the residual risk after taking into account controls and mitigations.

The residual risk rating is then compared to the category risk appetite.

Business processesRisk management updates are provided to SLT and AFRC on a regular basis, including any risk categories outside of

risk appetite or key risk indicators outside of limits, as well as corresponding actions being taken. Risk environment

monitoring is included in forecasting and budgeting processes and reported to the Board as part of those processes.

For the year ended 31 May 2025

31

Metrics and Targets
The following section presents LIC’s metrics and

targets. No specific industry-based metrics or other

key performance indicators were used in relation to

setting GHG targets or to otherwise measure and

manage climate-related risks and opportunities.

For the prior year, the New Zealand Government

Climate Change Response Act (2002) 2030 methane

reduction target was used to set a biogenic methane

reduction target.

All other metrics and targets are set out in

Table 9 below.

LIC uses the GHG Protocol’s categorisation of

Scopes and Categories (Figure 6) and we measure

our Scope 1 and 2 emissions using an operational

control approach.

We have measured and reported on LIC’s GHG

emissions since setting a baseline of the 2018/19

financial year (base year) and follow the principles

of the World Resources Institute and World Business

Council for Sustainable Development’s Greenhouse

Gas Protocol standards and guidance (collectively,

the GHG Protocol):

• Scope 1 emissions have been measured in

accordance with The Greenhouse Gas Protocol:

A Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard

(revised edition); and

• Scope 2 emissions have been measured in

accordance with The Greenhouse Gas Protocol:

GHG Protocol Scope 2 Guidance: An amendment to

the GHG Protocol Corporate Standard.

Scope 2

Indirect

Scope 3

Indirect

Scope 1

Direct

Scope 3

Indirect

Purchased

electricity,

steam, heat

and cooling

Leased assets

Employee

commuting

Business travel

Waste generated

in operations

Transportation

and distribution

Capital goods

Transportation

and distribution

Processing of

sold products

Use of sold

products

End-of-life

treatment of

sold product

Leased assets

Company

facilities

Purchased

goods and

services

Fuel and

energy

related

activities

FranchisesInvestments

Reporting companyDownstream activitesUpstream activities

CO

2

CH

4

N

2

OHFC

5

PFC

5

SF

6

Company

vehicles

Figure 6

LIC Climate Statements

32

To compile GHG data we use Toitū Envirocare’s external carbon calculator. Toitū’s
calculator provides updates of GHG emission factors as well as online guidance

and support.

During the reporting period, LIC’s GHG emissions absolute reduction targets were

reviewed by management and approved by the Board.

While we have been working hard on reducing emissions (see our progress as

set out in table 8 below), the targets previously set were not achievable given

challenges with sufficient novel technology not being available to achieve the

targeted emissions reduction. Our original targets were based on the assumption

that certain novel technologies would become available in the short to medium

term and would be cost-effective, enabling LIC to reduce its emissions. However,

these technologies are now unlikely to be available within the necessary timeframe

or timing and cost of availability is uncertain.

The previous targets set also did not reflect the measures required in order to

proceed with LIC’s unique opportunity to assist the New Zealand dairy sector

to reduce methane emissions intensity through genetic improvement R&D. This

opportunity has resulted in LIC increasing our trial animals and, accordingly, our

Scope 1 biogenic emissions for a period to conduct R&D. This is done to help drive

long-term reduction in methane emissions intensity for the New Zealand dairy

sector. LIC may also potentially need to hold a higher level of bulls over time if there

is a significant reduction in natural mating bulls across the dairy sector, which could

result in higher emissions for LIC but a lower level of methane emissions across the

dairy sector through breeding for lower-emitting cows.

The updated targets below apply for the entire current reporting period, do not

include any assumption for offsetting of emissions and, although SBTi methodology

has been considered, have not been accredited by SBTi.

GHG emissions – absolute

reduction targets

Updated target to

2035 (% below base

2018/19 year)

Previous target to

2030 (% below base

2018/19 year)

Basis for determination of target contribution to limiting global warming to 1.5°C

Scope 1 – Direct emissions,

excluding biogenic

emissions and emissions

related to animals

36.8%46.2%The previous target was recalculated to 2035 using SBTi methodology* (resulting in 67.2%),

then adjusted to exclude reductions we had assumed would be achievable based on the

development of novel technology, because it is too uncertain as to whether such technology

will be feasible or cost-effective (e.g. hydrogen fuel in rural areas) to enable LIC to achieve the

previous target.

Scope 2 – Indirect emissions46.2%46.2%The previous target was recalculated to 2035 using SBTi methodology* (resulting in 67.2%),

then adjusted to exclude reductions we had assumed would be achievable through installing

solar panels on leased properties, because it is too uncertain whether lease-owners will do

this. Although not factored into the new target, we also note that year-to-year LIC’s Scope 2

emissions could be subject to volatility related to the energy emissions factor.

Scope 1 – Direct biogenic

emissions

No target10%The previous target was based on NZ Government target, section 5Q(1)(b)(i) Climate Change

Response Act 2002 (target for 2030). This target has been withdrawn as LIC may need to hold

additional animals to support reduction of emissions across the NZ dairy herd.

*SBTi methodology has been used as a key input to the basis for our determination of targets contributing to limiting global warming to 1.5°C as it provides a framework for setting emissions

reduction targets aligned with climate science and the aim of limiting warming to 1.5°C above industrial levels.

For the year ended 31 May 2025

33

How our targets contribute to limiting global warming to 1.5°C
LIC considers that we will contribute proportionately to the efforts to limit

the global average temperature increase to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels

collectively through:

• LIC’s own GHG emissions absolute reduction targets which have been calculated

to the extent currently achievable based on adjustments to SBTi methodology for

Scope 1 and 2; and

• LIC’s contribution to reducing methane emissions intensity in the national dairy

herd through assisting dairy farmers and supporting milk processors to breed

for the future herd now, using the best tools, insights and genetics, including

breeding for lower methane emitting bulls and cows and reducing the demand for

natural mating bulls.

Note that LIC has not sought third party verification or opinion in relation to the

above statement and is not relying on carbon offsets to contribute proportionately.

Scope 1 & 2 GHG emissions

LIC uses the operational control approach to define emissions from Scope 1 and

2, including transportation, stationary combustion, agricultural emissions, onsite

wastewater treatment, and energy. LIC has used an absolute approach over

intensity-based emissions. We note that GHG quantification is subject to inherent

uncertainty because of incomplete scientific knowledge used to determine

emission factors and the values needed to combine emissions of different gases.

LIC Climate Statements

34

GHG emissions detail - table 7
Category and Source

2018/19

Base year

tCO

2

-e

2023/24

tCO

2

-e

2024/25*

tCO

2

-e

Change from

Base year

to 2024/25

tCO

2

-e

Change from

Base year

to 2024/25

%

Change from

2023/24

to 2024/25

tCO

2

-e

Change from

2023/24

to 2024/25

%

Scope 1 – Direct emissions**

Transport Fuel3,324.02,668.22,593.6-730.4-22.0%-74.6-2.8%

Diesel & gas stationary combustion175.1188.4180.85.73.2%-7.6-4.0%

Agricultural emissions***312.4390.1323.411.03.6%-66.7-17.1%

Total Scope 1 – Direct emissions**3,811.53,246.73,097.8-713.7-18.7%-148.9-4.6%

Scope 1 – Direct biogenic emissions

Agricultural emissions****3,920.34,010.93,689.9-230.4-5.9%-321.0-8.0%

Wastewater treatment1.61.01.60.01.9%0.663.1%

Total Scope 1 – Direct biogenic emissions3,921.94,011.93,691.5-230.4-5.9%-320.4-8.0%

Scope 2 – Indirect emissions

Electricity (location-based)377.1218.3295.0-82.1-21.8%76.735.1%

Total Scope 2 – Indirect emissions377.1218.3295.0-82.1-21.8%76.735.1%

Total Scope 1 & 2 emissions – tCO

2

-e8,110.57,476.97,084.3-1,026.2-12.7%-392.6-5.3%

* Only data for 2024/25 has been within the scope of limited assurance

** Excluding biogenic emissions and other agricultural emissions relating to animals

*** Emissions relating to crops, fertiliser use, and indirect N

2

O emissions

**** Emissions relating to effluent, excreta, and enteric fermentation

For the year ended 31 May 2025

35

Emission exclusions
Our focus has been on accurately reporting the emissions directly associated with

our operations and activities, as well as those emissions that occur upstream and

downstream of our value chain where we have significant influence. LIC has not yet

materially established our full value chain. Accordingly, LIC has adopted NZ CS 2

adoption exemption provisions 4 and 8 in relation to Scope 3 emissions disclosure

and assurance.

Scope 1 and 2 emission exclusions are detailed below:

6

Measuring emissions: A guide for organisations: 2025 detailed guide | Ministry for the Environment

GHG emissions

source or sink

GHG emissions categoryReason for exclusion

Refrigeration

Gases

Scope 1: Direct emissionsLIC used the Ministry for the Environment screening method

6

to calculate

an estimate and determined that R-gases are below the de minimis

threshold under Ministry for the Environment guidance material

6

. LIC will

include in future if actual data becomes available or estimated R-gases

exceed the de minimis threshold.

LPG gas

BBQ bottles

Scope 1: Direct emissionsLIC has a few 9kg LPG BBQ cylinders on site. These are excluded from the

inventory as they are below the de minimis threshold under Ministry for the

Environment guidance material

6

.

LIC international

subsidiaries -

all emissions

All categoriesLIC excluded international site data from the GHG inventory report as

emissions data is not readily available. A significance assessment has

been completed which indicated that the emissions are not currently

material. LIC will continue to conduct significance screening and intends

to source data in future where possible.

LIC Climate Statements

36

Overall performance against updated GHG emissions reduction targets
In the 2024/25 reporting year, LIC has reduced our Scope 1 emissions (excluding

biogenic emissions) by 18.7% against our 2018/19 base year. This reduction is better

than our projected 13.8% reduction required for this reporting year to meet our 2035

target of 36.8% Scope 1 reduction and includes no offsets.

Our Scope 2 emissions reduced by 21.8% from our 2018/19 base year. This reduction

is better than our projected 17.3% reduction required this year to keep us on track to

meet our 2035 target of 46.2% Scope 2 reduction and includes no offsets. Electricity

emissions increases compared to 2023/24 related to the change in the NZ energy

emission factor, which increased by 38.7% in the reporting year. LIC’s overall

electricity consumption reduced in the 2024/25 reporting year.

Our Scope 1 biogenic emissions decreased by 5.9% against our 2018/19 base year.

The previous target set in relation to biogenic emissions has been withdrawn and

no new target has been set based on LIC’s role in assisting the dairy sector to

reduce emissions intensity in the national dairy herd where increases could result

from a higher level of bulls and/or trial animals for climate-related initiatives,

including breeding for reduced methane emissions in the national dairy herd.

GHG emissions performance against target for 2024/25 and for prior period restated for updated targets - table 8

GHG EmissionsBaseline periodTarget date

Type of target

2024/25

performance

tCO

2

e*

2024/25

performance

% below base year

Expected annual

reduction 2024/25

%***

Target

2024/25

tCO

2

e

Scope 1 - Direct emissions**

2018/19 season2035Absolute 3,097.8-18.7%-13.8%3,285.5

Scope 2 - Indirect emissions

2018/19 season2035Absolute295.0-21.8%-17.3%311.8

* Only data for 2024/25 has been within the scope of limited assurance

** Excluding biogenic emissions and other agricultural emissions relating to animals

*** Annual reduction required based on linear allocation of target to 2035

GHG EmissionsBaseline periodTarget date

Type of target

2023/24

performance

tCO

2

e

2023/24

performance

% below base year

Expected annual

reduction 2024/25

%***

Target

2024/25

tCO

2

e

Scope 1 - Direct emissions**

2018/19 season2035Absolute3,246.7-14.8%-11.5%3,373.2

Scope 2 - Indirect emissions

2018/19 season2035Absolute218.3-42.1%-14.4%322.8

** Excluding biogenic emissions and other agricultural emissions relating to animals

*** Annual reduction required based on linear allocation of target to 2035

For the year ended 31 May 2025

37

Other Climate-related metrics – table 9
Required metrics2024/25 Metrics2023/24 MetricsTargetComments

GHG emissions intensity24.0 tonnes of Scope 1

& 2 CO

2

emissions per

NZD million revenue

28.0 tonnes of Scope 1

& 2 CO

2

emissions per

NZD million revenue

N /ARevenue is considered to be the most appropriate intensity metric

for LIC and emissions intensity has improved year-on-year with

revenue increasing at the same time as emissions decreasing. For

comparison, the Base year emissions intensity was 32.9 tonnes of

Scope 1 & 2 CO

2

emissions per NZD million revenue.

$ or % of assets/ business activity

vulnerable to transition risks

30% of business

activity due to smaller

dairy herd risk

30% of business

activity due to smaller

dairy herd risk

N /AFrom 2021 modelling by the Climate Change Commission – Tailwinds

scenario dataset. There is a high level of uncertainty in this metric

related to potential future dairy animal destocking regulation.

$ or % of assets/ business activity

vulnerable to physical risks

47% of business activity 46% of business activityN /AThis is the percentage of 2024/25 product/service revenue

representing business activity that could be impacted by LIC not

being able to access farms on a timely basis to perform services; not

a material change year-on-year. There is a high level of uncertainty

in this metric related to the proportion of business activity that could

be impacted by future material climate events and dependent on

timing of material climate events.

$ or % of assets/ business activity

aligned with climate-related

opportunities

32% of business activity 31% of business activity N /AThis is the percentage of 2024/25 product/service revenue that

is considered to be linked to climate-related opportunities; not a

material change year-on-year. There is a high level of uncertainty in

this metric related to potential changes in dairy farmer purchasing

activity and outcomes of current and future R&D on climate-related

opportunities.

$ Capital funding climate-related

risks/opportunities

$2.2 million$0.9 millionN /ACapitalised spend during the reporting period on climate-related

risks/opportunities, with the largest spend for 2024/25 relating to

build of a barn to use for measuring methane from lactating cows.

LIC’s Scope 1 – Direct emissions are largely derived from transportation fuel from

the company’s fleet (FY25: 84%, FY24: 82%) and on-farm agricultural emissions

(FY25: 10%, FY24: 12%). Much work has been done to reduce transport emissions by

continuing to electrify our fleet. The purchase of Tauwhare Farm in 2019 has meant

we have increased our fertiliser use since the 2018/19 base year. However, ongoing

fertiliser management routines have seen a decrease in emissions since the 2019/20

reporting year to 2024/25 of 41.5% (FY24: 13.1%).

The 2018/19 Scope 1 direct emissions base year and 2023/24 have been restated

to more appropriately re-categorise effluent and excreta N

2

O from Scope 1

direct emissions to Scope 1 direct biogenic emissions and the presentation of the

individual types of emissions consolidated. The overall total Scope 1 emissions for

2018/19 and 2023/24 are unchanged.

In the 2023/24 Climate Statements we disclosed that Liquid Nitrogen emissions

were excluded emissions as previously there has not been an emission factor for

this source in the New Zealand Ministry for the Environment guidance. During the

current reporting period emissions relating to Liquid Nitrogen were considered, with

the conclusion that LIC’s use of inert Liquid Nitrogen falls under Scope 3 emissions,

so are not required to be included in Scope 1 emissions.

Refer to Appendix Two for further information on LIC’s GHG emissions methods,

assumptions and estimation uncertainty.

LIC Climate Statements

38

7
Genomic records, ancestry information and technology allow us to accurately identify elite bulls at a young age by way of a calculated genomic Breeding Worth so we can start using those animals to breed the next

generation of cows sooner. The use of genomics in our breeding programme means we can reduce the generation interval from five years to two.

Required metrics2024/25 Metrics2023/24 MetricsTargetComments

Internal emissions price$68 per 1 tonne CO

2

-e

(or CH

4

for Biogenic

Methane converted to

CO

2

-e)

$80.64 per 1 tonne

CO2-e (or CH

4

for

Biogenic Methane

converted to CO

2

-e)

N /AThis was set for the year ended 31 May 2025 based on the 2024 ETS

Auction Price Floor (ie the prescribed minimum price for auctions of

New Zealand units in the Emissions Trading Scheme to clear) under

the Climate Change (Auctions, Limits and Price Controls for Units)

Regulations 2020 (in force as at 1 January 2025) and will be updated

annually. Although no auctions have cleared for some time, LIC

considers this is the most easily accessible public information as LIC

does not directly purchase offsets.

The internal emissions price is only required to be used in our

decision-making if there is expected to be more than 10 tonne CO

2

-e

annual impact with respect to the decision.

In the previous period the ETS Trigger Pricing for the release of

reserve units into auctions of New Zealand units in the Emissions

Trading Scheme was used as a base, which is no longer closely

correlated to prior clearing prices.

Management remuneration linked to

climate-related risks/ opportunities

Not specifically linked/

no specific KPIs,

strategic initiatives

include climate-related

risks/opportunities,

achievement of

which are part

of management

objectives broadly

Not specifically linked/

no specific KPIs,

strategic initiatives

include climate-related

risks/opportunities,

achievement of

which are part

of management

objectives broadly

N /AN /A

Industry/other metrics2024/25 Metrics2023/24 MetricsTargetComments

Bull team genetic gain – LIC metric34.6%34.0%34.4%

(current

year, FY24:

31.7%)

3-year rolling average rate of increase in the genomic Breeding

Worth

7

(gBW) of the Premier Sires bull teams to exceed the 10 year

historical average rate of increase by 20%

% change in cows – Industry metric0.57% increase to 4.70

million cows (2023/24

vs 2022/23)

3.46% decrease to 4.67

million cows (2022/23

vs 2021/22)

N /ASource: New Zealand Dairy Statistics 2023-24

Milk production efficiency – rolling

three-year average kilogram milk

solids per cow – Industry metric

0.3% increase to 395.6

per cow from 394.5

(three-year rolling

average to 2023/24 vs

average to 2022/23)

1.3% increase to 394.5

per cow from 389.4

(three-year rolling

average to 2022/23 vs

average to 2021/22)

N /ASource: New Zealand Dairy Statistics 2023-24

For the year ended 31 May 2025

39

We have engaged KPMG to undertake limited assurance over Scope 1 and 2 GHG
emissions for FY25. The limited assurance conclusion provided by KPMG is included

at Appendix Three.

Independent assurance

LIC Climate Statements

40

Climate Scenario Archetypes – the extent to which LIC’s scenarios rely on the various external
scenario archetypes

Appendix One

Sharp CorrectionsSlow FollowersHothouse

Intergovernmental Panel

on Climate Change (IPCC)

IPCC RCPs and SSPs provide a basis for global scenarios and pathways such as global socioeconomics. The SSP-RCP scenarios combine baseline

socio-economic narratives (the SSPs) with different emissions trajectories (based on the RCPs). Based on IPCC Assessment Reports 5 and 6.

• Representative

Concentration Pathways

(RCP)

RCP 1.9 RCP 4.5RCP 7.0

Relied upon for global emissions trajectories and level of global warming (in conjunction with SSPs).

• Shared Socioeconomic

Pathways (SSP)

SSP 1; Sustainability - Taking the green roadSSP 2; Middle of the RoadSSP 3; Regional Rivalry

Relied upon for global socioeconomic narratives including global GDP, population, technological change and consumption patterns.

Network for Greening the

Financial System (NGFS)

Short term: Sudden wakeup call

Long term: Net Zero 2050

Short term: Low policy ambition

Long term: Fragmented world

Short term: Diverging realities

Long term: Current Policies

Relied upon for understanding how economies may evolve under different assumptions. Use of both short- and long-term scenarios allowed for

better assumptions to be drawn from and provide validity at various time horizons.

Shared Policy Assumptions

for New Zealand (SPANZ)

100% SmartKicking & ScreamingUnspecific Pacific

Relied upon for specific New Zealand related assumptions, drawing from SSP and RCP assumptions. Used to describe potential mitigation and

adaptation policies for New Zealand.

New Zealand Climate

Change Commission (CCC)

2021 datasets

Further Behaviour Change, TailwindsHeadwindsCurrent Policy Reference

Relied upon for data specifically relating to each scenario, particularly dairy herd % change.

For the year ended 31 May 2025

41

Data Sources:
1. IIASA SSP (Shared Socioeconomic Pathways) Database SSP1-1.9, SSP2-4.5, SSP3-7.0.

2. Stats NZ, National population projections: 2022(base)–2073, 95th percentile, 75th percentile, 50th percentile.

3. Treasury New Zealand, (2023), Central projection, High projection.

4. Ministry for the Environment, NIWA (2024) Aotearoa New Zealand Climate Projections.

5. He Pou a Rangi, Climate Change Commission. (2021). Scenarios dataset for the Commission’s 2021 Final Advice

(output from ENZ model). Further Behaviour Change, Tailwinds, Headwinds and Current Policy Reference

6. Ministry for the Environment (2024) Coastal hazards and climate change guidance

Sharp CorrectionsSlow FollowersHothouse

Global Temp Increase

1

Best estimate relative to

pre-industrial levels by 2100

1.5°C2.7°C3.6°C

NZ Population increase

2

For 2073 relative to 2022

30%38%53%

NZ Carbon Price

3

For 2070, per tonne

$557$369$35

5

NZ emissions

5

For 2050 relative to 2005

20 MtCO

2

-e24 MtCO

2

-e40 MtCO

2

-e

Electricity from renewable sources

5

By 2050

96%96%92%

NZ sea level rise

6


For 2050 relative to 2005

0.20m0.22m0.32m

NZ extreme rainfall

4

For 2100 relative to 1986-2005 baseline

+13%+25%+30%

NZ extreme heat (>30°C)

4

For 2100 relative to 1986-2005 baseline

+7 days+16 days+28 days

NZ native forestry

5

For 2050 relative to 2005

0.8Mha0.5Mha0.2Mha

NZ potential evapotranspiration deficit

4


For 2100 relative to 1986-2005 baseline

103mm165mm223mm

LIC Climate Statements

42

GHG emissions methods, assumptions and estimation uncertainty
LIC uses an operational control consolidation approach to account for emissions.

Organisational boundaries were set with reference to the methodology described in

the GHG Protocol. The GHG protocol allows two distinct approaches to consolidate

GHG emissions: equity share or control approaches (financial or operations).

LIC has opted to disclose our GHG emissions using the operational control

consolidation approach for our New Zealand operations for Scopes 1 and 2 of our

GHG inventory. The operational control consolidation approach was chosen as LIC

recognises that all our operations may have a direct impact on the environment.

LIC has excluded the following business entities from our GHG inventory:

• Ireland

• Australia; and

• UK.

LIC excluded international site data from the GHG inventory report as emissions

data is not readily available. A significance assessment has been completed which

indicated that the emissions are not currently material.

A calculation methodology has been used for quantifying the emissions inventory

based on the following calculation approach unless otherwise stated below:

Emissions = activity data x emissions factor

LIC uses actual data to calculate GHG emissions provided by service providers

unless otherwise stated in the following table. Emissions were calculated using Toitū

emanage, OverseerFM and LIC scientists using IPCC Global Warming Potentials

(GWP). Toitū updated their emission factors on 26 May 2025 with the updated

national emission factors used for greenhouse gas inventories in Aotearoa New

Zealand released by the Ministry for the Environment 16 May 2025. The updated

emissions factors were applied to LIC’s data within Toitū’s emanage software prior

to this reporting years inventory being compiled.

LIC has systems and procedures in place that will ensure applied quantification

methodologies will continue in future GHG emissions inventories, or that material

changes will be managed and disclosed.

8

www.ipcc.ch/assessment-report/ar5/

GHG

emissions Scope

GHG emissions

source or sink

subcategory

GHG

emissions included

Explanation of uncertainties or assumptions

around your data and evidence

Emission factor source detail and Global

Warming Potential (GWP)

Scope 1: Direct

emissions

and removals

Diesel & Gas

stationary

combustion

LPG stationary

commercial, Natural

Gas distributed

commercial,

Diesel stationary

combustion

Data sourced from supplier invoices and

spreadsheets of actual use. Missing some data

occasionally from unavailable emails/ invoices

misfiled. When that has occurred data average

for the period is used for that month. Data set is

materially complete.

Estimates of diesel fuel in the generators. No

reporting on top-ups. Fuel use determined using

formula 75% power 1 hour run time per month *12

months per year *L/hr based off specification sheets

for each generator. Data set not complete.

Calculated in emanage using New Zealand

Ministry for the Environment Measuring emissions:

A guide for organisations: 2025 Emission factors

workbook.

IPCC AR5

8

Appendix Two

For the year ended 31 May 2025

43

9
www.ipcc.ch/assessment-report/ar4/

GHG emissions

Scope

GHG emissions

source or sink

subcategory

GHG emissions

included

Explanation of uncertainties or assumptions

around your data and evidence

Emission factor source detail and Global

Warming Potential (GWP)

Scope 1: Direct

emissions

and removals

Transport fuelDiesel, Petrol

premium, Petrol

regular

Rely on Levno, SG Fleet, and Toyota data. LIC’s

policy is that fuel cards can only be used to purchase

fuel, (unless a remote location without our preferred

provider) and as such we have good reporting on fuel

litres purchased. Data set is complete.

Calculated in emanage using New Zealand

Ministry for the Environment Measuring emissions:

A guide for organisations: 2025 Emission factors

workbook.

IPCC AR5

8

Scope 1: Direct

emissions

and removals

Agricultural emissionsFertiliser dissolution,

and fertiliser N

2

O

Farm data is determined using stocking rates,

fertiliser applications, feed etc. Ravensdown enters

data into Overseer. Human error when transferring

data can lead to miscalculations. Data set is

complete.

Data is published from OverseerFM into Toitū my

farms and then downloaded and entered into the

emanage software as precalculated emissions.

Emissions from animals not in OverseerFM are

determined by an LIC scientist using internal

methodology (from IPCC fourth assessment report

AR4

9

), so may have a higher level of uncertainty.

Scope 1: Direct/

direct biogenic

emissions

and removals

Agricultural emissionsCrop N

2

O, and indirect

N

2

O emissions

Farm data is determined using stocking rates,

fertiliser applications, feed etc. Ravensdown enters

data into Overseer. Human error when transferring

data can lead to miscalculations. Data set is

complete.

Data is published from OverseerFM into Toitū my

farms and then downloaded and entered into the

emanage software as precalculated emissions.

Emissions from animals not in OverseerFM are

determined by an LIC scientist using internal

methodology (from IPCC fourth assessment report

AR4

9

), so may have a higher level of uncertainty.

Scope 1: Direct

biogenic

emissions

and removals

Wastewater

treatment

Wastewater for

treatment plants

(average)

Assume that water samples taken monthly are

accurate and that the water meters are functioning

correctly. The system is maintained regularly. Data

set is complete.

Calculated in emanage using New Zealand

Ministry for the Environment Measuring emissions:

A guide for organisations: 2025 Emission factors

workbook.

IPCC AR5

8

LIC Climate Statements

44

GHG emissions
Scope

GHG emissions

source or sink

subcategory

GHG emissions

included

Explanation of uncertainties or assumptions

around your data and evidence

Emission factor source detail and Global

Warming Potential (GWP)

Scope 1: Direct

biogenic

emissions

and removals

Agricultural emissionsEffluent methane

and excreta

methane, Effluent

N

2

O, excreta N

2

O,

Enteric fermentation

methane

Farm data is determined using stocking rates,

fertiliser applications, feed etc. Ravensdown enters

data into Overseer. Human error when transferring

data can lead to miscalculations. Data set is

complete.

Data is published from OverseerFM into Toitū my

farms and then downloaded and entered into the

emanage software as precalculated emissions.

Emissions from animals not in OverseerFM are

determined by an LIC Scientist using internal

methodology (from IPCC fourth assessment report

AR4

9

), so may have a higher level of uncertainty.

Overall assessment of uncertainty for

Scope 1 emissions and removals*

Medium

Scope 2: Indirect

emissions from

imported energy

ElectricityElectricityAssume that supplier invoices and provided

spreadsheets are correct. Calculated using the

location-based method. The market-based method

is not materially different: 250 tCO

2

vs 295.1 (FY24:

219.2 tCO

2

emissions vs 218.3). Averages were used to

calculate four sites where a minor number of invoices

were missing. All other data was complete.

Calculated in emanage using New Zealand

Ministry for the Environment Measuring emissions:

A guide for organisations: 2025 Emission factors

workbook.

IPCC AR5

8

Overall assessment of uncertainty for

Scope 2 emissions and removals*

Low

* Uncertainties are determined by emission factor uncertainties and overall data quality calculated in emanage:

• Low uncertainty – high quality complete data set and low to medium emission factor uncertainty

• Medium uncertainty – data set incomplete, some estimation required and medium emission factor uncertainty

• High uncertainty – large use of estimated data and medium to high emission factor uncertainty.

For the year ended 31 May 2025

45

Independent assurance report
Appendix Three


© 2025 KPMG, a New Zealand Partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organization of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a private English company limited by guarantee. All rights reserved.


Document classification: KPMG Public


Independent Limited Assurance Report to

Livestock Improvement Corporation


Conclusion

Our limited assurance conclusion has been formed on the basis of the matters outlined in this report.

Based on our limited assurance engagement, which is not a reasonable assurance engagement or an audit, nothing has come to our attention that would lead us

to believe that, in all material respects, the scope 1 and 2 gross greenhouse gas emissions, additional required disclosures and methods, assumptions and

estimation uncertainty disclosures included in the Climate Statements on pages 32 to 38 and 43 to 45 (GHG disclosures) are not fairly presented and prepared

in accordance with the Aotearoa New Zealand Climate Standards (NZ CSs) issued by the External Reporting Board (the criteria) for the period 1 June 2024 to

31 May 2025.

Information subject to assurance

We have performed an engagement to provide limited assurance in relation to Livestock Improvement Corporation’s (the Company) GHG disclosures for the

period 1 June 2024 to 31 May 2025.

Our conclusion on the GHG disclosures does not extend to any other information included, or referred to, in the Climate Statements on pages 32 to 38 and 43 to 45

or other information that accompanies or contains the Climate Statements and our assurance report (other information). We have not performed any procedures

with respect to the other information.

© 2025 KPMG, a New Zealand Partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organization of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a private English company limited by guarantee. All rights reserved.

Document classification: KPMG Public

Independent Limited Assurance Report to

Livestock Improvement Corporation

Conclusion

Our limited assurance conclusion has been formed on the basis of the matters outlined in this report.

Based on our limited assurance engagement, which is not a reasonable assurance engagement or an audit, nothing has come to our attention that would lead us

to believe that, in all material respects, the scope 1 and 2 gross greenhouse gas emissions, additional required disclosures and methods, assumptions and

estimation uncertainty disclosures, included in the Climate Statements on pages 32 to 38 and 43 to 45 (GHG disclosures) are not fairly presented and prepared

in accordance with the Aotearoa New Zealand Climate Standards (NZ CSs) issued by the External Reporting Board (the criteria) for the period 1 June 2024 to 31

May 2025.

Information subject to assurance

We have performed an engagement to provide limited assurance in relation to Livestock Improvement Corporation’s (the Company) GHG disclosures for the

period 1 June 2024 to 31 May 2025.

Our conclusion on the GHG disclosures does not extend to any other information included, or referred to, in the Climate Statements on pages 32 to 38 and 43 to

45 or other information that accompanies or contains the Climate Statements and our assurance report (other information). We have not performed any

procedures with respect to the other information.

DRAFT

© 2025 KPMG, a New Zealand Partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organization of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a private English company limited by guarantee. All rights reserved.

Document classification: KPMG Public

Independent Limited Assurance Report to

Livestock Improvement Corporation

Conclusion

Our limited assurance conclusion has been formed on the basis of the matters outlined in this report.

Based on our limited assurance engagement, which is not a reasonable assurance engagement or an audit, nothing has come to our attention that would lead us

to believe that, in all material respects, the scope 1 and 2 gross greenhouse gas emissions, additional required disclosures and methods, assumptions and

estimation uncertainty disclosures, included in the Climate Statements on pages 32 to 38 and 43 to 45 (GHG disclosures) are not fairly presented and prepared

in accordance with the Aotearoa New Zealand Climate Standards (NZ CSs) issued by the External Reporting Board (the criteria) for the period 1 June 2024 to 31

May 2025.

Information subject to assurance

We have performed an engagement to provide limited assurance in relation to Livestock Improvement Corporation’s (the Company) GHG disclosures for the

period 1 June 2024 to 31 May 2025.

Our conclusion on the GHG disclosures does not extend to any other information included, or referred to, in the Climate Statements on pages 32 to 38 and 43 to

45 or other information that accompanies or contains the Climate Statements and our assurance report (other information). We have not performed any

procedures with respect to the other information.

DRAFT

LIC Climate Statements

46




Criteria

The criteria used as the basis of reporting include the NZ CSs. As disclosed on page 32 of the Climate Statement, the greenhouse gas emissions have been

measured in accordance with the World Resources Institute and World Business Council for Sustainable Development’s Greenhouse Gas Protocol standards and

guidance (collectively, the GHG Protocol):

• The Greenhouse Gas Protocol: A Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard (revised edition); and

• Scope 2 emissions have been measured in accordance with The Greenhouse Gas Protocol: GHG Protocol Scope 2 Guidance: An amendment to the GHG

Protocol Corporate Standard.

As a result, this report may not be suitable for another purpose.

Standards we followed

We conducted our limited assurance engagement in accordance with New Zealand Standard on Assurance Engagements 1 (NZ SAE 1) Assurance Engagements

over Greenhouse Gas Emissions Disclosures and International Standard on Assurance Engagements (New Zealand) 3410 Assurance Engagements on

Greenhouse Gas Statements (ISAE (NZ) 3410) issued by the New Zealand Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (Standard). We believe that the evidence we

have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our conclusion.

Our responsibilities under the Standard are further described in the ‘Our responsibility’ section of our report.


Other Matter – Prior year comparatives not assured

The GHG disclosures for the period 1 June 2023 to 31 May 2024 and 1 June 2018 to 31 May 2019 (also referred to as the ‘Base year’) were not subject to our

limited assurance engagement and, accordingly, we do not express a conclusion, or provide any assurance on such information.

Our conclusion is not modified in respect of this matter.

How to interpret limited assurance and material misstatement

A limited assurance engagement is substantially less in scope than a reasonable assurance engagement in relation to both the risk assessment procedures,

including an understanding of internal control, and the procedures performed in response to the assessed risks.

Misstatements, including omissions, within the GHG disclosures are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to

influence the relevant decisions of the intended users taken on the basis of the GHG disclosures.




Inherent limitations

As noted in the GHG disclosures page 35 and 42 to 44, GHG quantification is subject to inherent uncertainty because of incomplete scientific knowledge used to

determine emission factors and the values needed to combine emissions of different gases.

Use of this assurance report

Our report is made solely for the Company. Our assurance work has been undertaken so that we might state to the Company those matters we are required to

state to them in the assurance report and for no other purpose.

Our report should not be regarded as suitable to be used or relied on by anyone other than the Company for any purpose or in any context. Any other person who

obtains access to our report or a copy thereof and chooses to rely on our report (or any part thereof) will do so at its own risk.

To the fullest extent permitted by law, none of KPMG, any entities directly or indirectly controlled by KPMG, or any of their respective members or employees

accept or assume any responsibility and deny all liability to anyone other than the Company for our work, for this independent assurance report, and/or for the

opinions or conclusions we have reached.

Our conclusion is not modified in respect of this matter.

The Company’s responsibility for the GHG disclosures

The Directors of the Company are responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of the GHG disclosures in accordance with the criteria. This responsibility

includes the design, implementation and maintenance of such internal control as Directors determine is relevant to enable the preparation of the GHG disclosures

that are free from material misstatement whether due to fraud or error.

The Directors of the Company are also responsible for selecting or developing suitable criteria for preparing the GHG disclosures and appropriately referring to or

describing the criteria used.

Our responsibility

We have responsibility for:

• planning and performing the engagement to obtain limited assurance about whether the GHG disclosures are free from material misstatement, whether

due to fraud or error;

• forming an independent conclusion based on the procedures we have performed and the evidence we have obtained; and

• reporting our conclusion to the Company.

DRAFT

For the year ended 31 May 2025

47




Inherent limitations

As noted in the GHG disclosures page 34 and 43 to 45, GHG quantification is subject to inherent uncertainty because of incomplete scientific knowledge used to

determine emission factors and the values needed to combine emissions of different gases.

Use of this assurance report

Our report is made solely for the Company. Our assurance work has been undertaken so that we might state to the Company those matters we are required to

state to them in the assurance report and for no other purpose.

Our report should not be regarded as suitable to be used or relied on by anyone other than the Company for any purpose or in any context. Any other person who

obtains access to our report or a copy thereof and chooses to rely on our report (or any part thereof) will do so at its own risk.

To the fullest extent permitted by law, none of KPMG, any entities directly or indirectly controlled by KPMG, or any of their respective members or employees

accept or assume any responsibility and deny all liability to anyone other than the Company for our work, for this independent assurance report, and/or for the

opinions or conclusions we have reached.

Our conclusion is not modified in respect of this matter.

The Company’s responsibility for the GHG disclosures

The Directors of the Company are responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of the GHG disclosures in accordance with the criteria. This responsibility

includes the design, implementation and maintenance of such internal control as Directors determine is relevant to enable the preparation of the GHG disclosures

that are free from material misstatement whether due to fraud or error.

The Directors of the Company are also responsible for selecting or developing suitable criteria for preparing the GHG disclosures and appropriately referring to or

describing the criteria used.

Our responsibility

We have responsibility for:

• planning and performing the engagement to obtain limited assurance about whether the GHG disclosures are free from material misstatement, whether

due to fraud or error;

• forming an independent conclusion based on the procedures we have performed and the evidence we have obtained; and

• reporting our conclusion to the Company.




Inherent limitations

As noted in the GHG disclosures page 35 and 42 to 44, GHG quantification is subject to inherent uncertainty because of incomplete scientific knowledge used to

determine emission factors and the values needed to combine emissions of different gases.

Use of this assurance report

Our report is made solely for the Company. Our assurance work has been undertaken so that we might state to the Company those matters we are required to

state to them in the assurance report and for no other purpose.

Our report should not be regarded as suitable to be used or relied on by anyone other than the Company for any purpose or in any context. Any other person who

obtains access to our report or a copy thereof and chooses to rely on our report (or any part thereof) will do so at its own risk.

To the fullest extent permitted by law, none of KPMG, any entities directly or indirectly controlled by KPMG, or any of their respective members or employees

accept or assume any responsibility and deny all liability to anyone other than the Company for our work, for this independent assurance report, and/or for the

opinions or conclusions we have reached.

Our conclusion is not modified in respect of this matter.

The Company’s responsibility for the GHG disclosures

The Directors of the Company are responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of the GHG disclosures in accordance with the criteria. This responsibility

includes the design, implementation and maintenance of such internal control as Directors determine is relevant to enable the preparation of the GHG disclosures

that are free from material misstatement whether due to fraud or error.

The Directors of the Company are also responsible for selecting or developing suitable criteria for preparing the GHG disclosures and appropriately referring to or

describing the criteria used.

Our responsibility

We have responsibility for:

• planning and performing the engagement to obtain limited assurance about whether the GHG disclosures are free from material misstatement, whether

due to fraud or error;

• forming an independent conclusion based on the procedures we have performed and the evidence we have obtained; and

• reporting our conclusion to the Company.

DRAFT

LIC Climate Statements

48




Summary of the work we performed as the basis for our conclusion

A limited assurance engagement performed in accordance with the Standard involves assessing the suitability in the circumstances of the Company’s use of the

criteria as the basis for the preparation of the GHG disclosures, assessing the risks of material misstatement of the GHG disclosures whether due to fraud or error,

responding to the assessed risks as necessary in the circumstances, and evaluating the overall presentation of the GHG disclosures.

We exercised professional judgment and maintained professional scepticism throughout the engagement. We designed and performed our procedures to obtain

evidence about the GHG disclosures that is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our conclusion.

Our procedures selected depended on the understanding of the GHG disclosures that is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our conclusion. The

procedures we performed were based on our professional judgment and included inquiries, observation of processes performed, inspection of documents,

analytical procedures, evaluating the appropriateness of quantification methods and reporting policies, and agreeing or reconciling with underlying records.

In undertaking limited assurance on the GHG disclosures the procedures we primarily performed were:

• obtained, through inquiries and walkthroughs, an understanding of the Company’s control environment, processes and information systems relevant to the

preparation of the GHG disclosures. We did not evaluate the design of particular control activities, or obtain evidence about their implementation;

• evaluated whether the Company’s methods for developing estimates are appropriate and had been consistently applied. Our procedures did not include

testing the data on which the estimates are based or separately developing our own estimates against which to evaluate the Company’s estimates;

• recalculated the emissions for a limited number of items;

• performed analytical procedures on particular emission categories by comparing the expected GHGs emitted to actual GHGs emitted and made inquiries

of management to obtain explanations for any significant differences we identified; and

• considered the presentation and disclosure of the GHG disclosures against the NZCS disclosure requirements.

The procedures performed in a limited assurance engagement vary in nature and timing from, and are less in extent than for a reasonable assurance engagement.

Consequently, the level of assurance obtained in a limited assurance engagement is substantially lower than the assurance that would have been obtained had a

reasonable assurance engagement been performed.

Our independence and quality management

This assurance engagement was undertaken in accordance with NZ SAE 1. NZ SAE 1 is founded on the fundamental principles of independence, integrity,

objectivity, professional competence and due care, confidentiality and professional behaviour.

We have complied with the independence and other ethical requirements of Professional and Ethical Standard 1 International Code of Ethics for Assurance

Practitioners (including International Independence Standards) (New Zealand) (PES 1) issued by the New Zealand Auditing and Assurance Standards Board,

which is founded on fundamental principles of integrity, objectivity, professional competence and due care, confidentiality and professional behaviour.

The firm applies Professional and Ethical Standard 3 Quality Management for Firms that Perform Audits or Reviews of Financial Statements, or Other Assurance or

Related Services Engagements (PES 3), which requires the firm to design, implement and operate a system of quality control including policies or procedures

regarding compliance with ethical requirements, professional standards and applicable legal and regulatory requirements.




Inherent limitations

As noted in the GHG disclosures page 35 and 42 to 44, GHG quantification is subject to inherent uncertainty because of incomplete scientific knowledge used to

determine emission factors and the values needed to combine emissions of different gases.

Use of this assurance report

Our report is made solely for the Company. Our assurance work has been undertaken so that we might state to the Company those matters we are required to

state to them in the assurance report and for no other purpose.

Our report should not be regarded as suitable to be used or relied on by anyone other than the Company for any purpose or in any context. Any other person who

obtains access to our report or a copy thereof and chooses to rely on our report (or any part thereof) will do so at its own risk.

To the fullest extent permitted by law, none of KPMG, any entities directly or indirectly controlled by KPMG, or any of their respective members or employees

accept or assume any responsibility and deny all liability to anyone other than the Company for our work, for this independent assurance report, and/or for the

opinions or conclusions we have reached.

Our conclusion is not modified in respect of this matter.

The Company’s responsibility for the GHG disclosures

The Directors of the Company are responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of the GHG disclosures in accordance with the criteria. This responsibility

includes the design, implementation and maintenance of such internal control as Directors determine is relevant to enable the preparation of the GHG disclosures

that are free from material misstatement whether due to fraud or error.

The Directors of the Company are also responsible for selecting or developing suitable criteria for preparing the GHG disclosures and appropriately referring to or

describing the criteria used.

Our responsibility

We have responsibility for:

• planning and performing the engagement to obtain limited assurance about whether the GHG disclosures are free from material misstatement, whether

due to fraud or error;

• forming an independent conclusion based on the procedures we have performed and the evidence we have obtained; and

• reporting our conclusion to the Company.

DRAFT

For the year ended 31 May 2025

49




We have also complied with Professional and Ethical Standard 4 Engagement Quality Reviews (PES 4) which deals with the appointment and eligibility of the

engagement quality reviewer and the engagement quality reviewer’s responsibilities relating to the performance and documentation of an engagement quality

review.

Our firm has also provided financial audit services and taxation compliance and agreed upon procedure services for the R&D tax incentive scheme to the

Company. Subject to certain restrictions, partners and employees of our firm may also deal with the Company on normal terms within the ordinary course of trading

activities of the business of Livestock Improvement Corporation. These matters have not impaired our independence as assurance providers of the Company for

this engagement. The firm has no other relationship with, or interest in, the Company.

As we are engaged to form an independent conclusion on the GHG disclosures prepared by the Company, we are not permitted to be involved in the preparation of

the GHG disclosures as doing so may compromise our independence.

The engagement partner on the assurance engagement resulting in this independent assurance report is David Gates.



KPMG

Wellington

20 August 2025




Inherent limitations

As noted in the GHG disclosures page 35 and 42 to 44, GHG quantification is subject to inherent uncertainty because of incomplete scientific knowledge used to

determine emission factors and the values needed to combine emissions of different gases.

Use of this assurance report

Our report is made solely for the Company. Our assurance work has been undertaken so that we might state to the Company those matters we are required to

state to them in the assurance report and for no other purpose.

Our report should not be regarded as suitable to be used or relied on by anyone other than the Company for any purpose or in any context. Any other person who

obtains access to our report or a copy thereof and chooses to rely on our report (or any part thereof) will do so at its own risk.

To the fullest extent permitted by law, none of KPMG, any entities directly or indirectly controlled by KPMG, or any of their respective members or employees

accept or assume any responsibility and deny all liability to anyone other than the Company for our work, for this independent assurance report, and/or for the

opinions or conclusions we have reached.

Our conclusion is not modified in respect of this matter.

The Company’s responsibility for the GHG disclosures

The Directors of the Company are responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of the GHG disclosures in accordance with the criteria. This responsibility

includes the design, implementation and maintenance of such internal control as Directors determine is relevant to enable the preparation of the GHG disclosures

that are free from material misstatement whether due to fraud or error.

The Directors of the Company are also responsible for selecting or developing suitable criteria for preparing the GHG disclosures and appropriately referring to or

describing the criteria used.

Our responsibility

We have responsibility for:

• planning and performing the engagement to obtain limited assurance about whether the GHG disclosures are free from material misstatement, whether

due to fraud or error;

• forming an independent conclusion based on the procedures we have performed and the evidence we have obtained; and

• reporting our conclusion to the Company.

DRAFT

LIC Climate Statements

50

605 Ruakura Road
Newstead 3286

Hamilton

New Zealand

07 856 0700 | lic.co.nz

Data sourced from publicly available filings. Our datasets may not be complete. Automated analysis can produce errors. If you believe any data on this page is incorrect, please contact us at hello@nzxplorer.co.nz. For informational purposes only. Not investment advice.

Other issuers discussed similar conditions around this time

Matched by meaning across NZX announcement text, not keywords — based on our semantic index of announcement bodies.