Vector Limited/Announcement
Vector Limited logo

Vector announces full year results

Full Year Results24 August 2025VCTUtilities

creating a new energy future



Vector announces full year results and continued reliability

and resilience investment

 Revenue from continuing operations, excluding contributions, is up 9% to

$893.5 million.

 Group adjusted EBITDA

1

for continuing operations $401.1 million, up 16%.

 Group net profit after tax for continuing operations $154.7 million, inclusive of a

$37 million impairment of the gas distribution network.

 Final dividend 13 cents per share

2

.

 Group capital expenditure for continuing operations $470.1 million, down 6%.

 Deployment of GridAware to optimise asset inspections, the first tool to be

deployed from our partnership with X (Google’s innovation lab) and Tapestry,

its energy moonshot.

 55% carbon emissions reduction achieved against a goal of 53.5%. This was

set in 2020, to reach by FY2030

3

.

Vector Group (NZX: VCT) today announced solid financial results, and continued investment

into the reliability and resilience of the electricity network.

Vector Group Chief Executive Simon Mackenzie said, “The year’s financial result sees

adjusted earnings for the group before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation (adjusted

EBITDA

1

), for continuing operations, up 16% to $401.1 million. Total capital expenditure for


1

EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are non-GAAP measures which the directors and

management believe provide useful information as they are used internally to evaluate

performance of business units, to establish operational goals and to allocate resources.

Adjusted EBITDA excludes the capital contributions customers pay for new connections

on the network. See the financial statements for further details or click on this link to see

Vector’s policy.

2

The dividend will be paid to shareholders who are on the register at 5 September, with

payment made on 17 September.

3

The target set in FY2020 was to reduce scope 1 and 2 emissions (excluding electricity

distribution losses) by 53.5% by FY2030 from an FY2020 baseline. The emissions

reduction target does not rely on any offsets.

market release

25 August 2025

creating a new energy future


continuing operations was $470.1 million, down $29.1 million, reflecting a number of factors

including the timing of large projects. Group net profit after tax was $154.7 million, inclusive

of a $37 million impairment of our gas distribution business, following forecasts in our gas

asset management plan that show total connections starting to decline from FY26, as a

result of significant market uncertainty, scarcity of gas and rising costs. Following the

impairment the carrying value of the gas distribution business is consistent with the

estimated value of the regulated asset base”.


The board has determined an unimputed final dividend of 13 cents per share, taking the full

year dividend to 25 cents per share. This represents an 85% payout of free cash flow, in the

mid-point of the 70-100% range as stated in our policy. Shareholders should not interpret this

year’s payout as being an indication that future dividends will be in the midpoint of the range.


“Our business portfolio has continued to evolve. The completion of the sales of Natural Gas

Trading, Vector Ongas and our shareholding in Liquigas, are examples of successful

transactions that align with the risk and future operating environment of each business. The

completed transactions enable us to concentrate on the core strengths and demands of our

regulated electricity and gas networks and explore growth opportunities such as through

Vector Technology Solutions, or our investment in metering business Bluecurrent.


“On 1 August, after balance date for these results, Vector announced via the NZX the sale of

HRV.


“We’ve seen some changes to our regulatory settings in the year. As of 1 April 2025, we

entered into the new five-yearly regulatory cycle for electricity networks, as set by the

Commerce Commission. This is known as DPP4. We’re well placed to continue our

investment approach, which is to avoid committing to high levels of capital investment in

areas where there is significant uncertainty, or to cover short demand peaks when there are

other, less capital intensive ways to use available capacity and build network resilience.


“We’ve also seen some decisions announced by the Electricity Authority on connection

processes. We support efforts to streamline and clarify these processes and we remain

creating a new energy future


committed to advocating for reforms that are fair, efficient, and do not impose undue costs on

existing customers.


“We await with great interest the release of the Frontier report which the Government has

commissioned to help with its review into the electricity market. Vector has taken an active

interest in the process and will continue to provide input into important issues such as

security of supply, and an efficient market for customers.


“The DPP4 regulatory cycle for electricity distribution networks has seen electricity network

assets being repriced by the Commerce Commission to reflect higher interest rates and

COVID-19 inflation impacts. This has resulted in price increases, which we recognise is hard

on all consumers, however in real terms our electricity lines charges remain very similar to

what they were more than ten years ago.


“Our commitment to Auckland’s growth and electrification remains strong, and the region

continues to grow despite the broader economic slowdown. While we’ve seen a softening in

the rate of new connections this year, and fewer private electric vehicles being sold, we’re

continuing to work closely with customers to ensure we understand, prepare for, and enable

their evolving needs.


“In 2020, we set a target to reduce direct emissions (Scope 1 and 2, excluding electrical line

losses) by 53.5% by 2030, aligned with the Science Based Targets initiative to limit warming

to below 1.5C. This year we recorded a reduction of 55%, which is calculated against the

businesses we have now

4

. This result was driven by innovation in technology and processes,

with successful initiatives now embedded in our operations. We’ll continue to focus on our

emissions targets and we recognise there could be some volatility in maintaining and

improving our overall emissions.”


4

Due to the completion of the sales of Vector Ongas, our shareholding in Liquigas, and

some natural gas trading contracts, our historic emissions inventory has been

recalculated to exclude these emissions. This enables our year-to-year results to reflect

our actual emission reductions. For more on the methodology, see our greenhouse gas

emissions inventory report, at vector.co.nz/reports.

creating a new energy future


Key financial and operational information


Business segment FY24 FY25 % change

Electricity

- Revenue excluding contributions

- Adjusted EBITDA

- Total connections


$687.4m

$295.1m

624,330


$762.2m

$351.9m

632,106


+11%

+19%

+1%

Gas Distribution

- Revenue excluding contributions

- Adjusted EBITDA

- Total connections


$65.1m

$44.8m

120,354


$67.2m

$46.7m

120,621


+3%

+4%

+0%


ENDS

Further details can be read in Vector’s annual report. This along with our climate-related

disclosures report, and greenhouse gas emissions inventory report are available here:

vector.co.nz/reports.



Investor contact

Jason Hollingworth, Chief Financial Officer, Vector

Jason.hollingworth@vector.co.nz, 021 312 928


Media contact

Matthew Britton, Communications Manager, Vector

Matthew.britton@vector.co.nz, 021 224 2966




About Vector

Vector is an innovative New Zealand energy company, delivering energy and communication

services to more than 630,000 residential and commercial customers across New Zealand.

Vector has a leading role in creating a new energy future through its Symphony strategy which

puts customers at the heart of the energy system. Vector is listed on the New Zealand Stock

Exchange with ticker symbol VCT. Our majority shareholder, with voting rights of 75.1%, is

Entrust. For further information, visit www.vector.co.nz.

---

Smart moves
ANNUAL REPORT 2025

Smart starts
with people

In today’s constantly changing

energy landscape, Vector is

focused on delivering what

Kiwi homes and businesses

rely on every day: safe, reliable,

resilient and affordable energy

infrastructure. We’re using smart

technology and innovation to

do this for our customers.


1

Investing
in a smarter

system


2

Vector Annual Report 2025

We’re investing in critical
infrastructure, both physical

and digital, and we’re

sharpening our focus on

data and insights, to boost

resilience in the face of

climate change, empower

our customers, and support

economic growth.


3

As we transition to an
electrified future, we’re

making a series of smart

moves to deliver affordability,

accessibility and reliability,

because this matters more

than ever to our customers

and the country.

Powering

a smarter

future


4

Vector Annual Report 2025

About this report
This report, dated 22 August 2025, is a review of Vector’s financial

and operational performance for the year ended 30 June 2025.

The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with

appropriate accounting standards and have been independently

audited by KPMG.

The financial and operational information has been compiled in line

with NZX Listing Rules and recommendations for investor reporting.

The report has drawn from a wide range of information sources. This

includes: our stakeholders, customers, communities, sustainability

framework, value drivers, risk register, board reports, asset

management plan, financial statements and our operational reports.

Performance snapshot6

Chair and group chief executive report8

Environmental, social and governance (ESG)

People, health and safety

Sustainability

12

14

18

Business segment reports

Electricity

Gas distribution

20

22

24

Vector Technology Solutions (VTS)25

Governance report26

Remuneration report36

Who we are

Our board

Our management team

Entrust, majority shareholder of Vector

44

46

48

50

Other disclosures

Operating statistics

Five-year financial performance

Non-GAAP financial information

51

52

53

55

Financials

Financial statements

Notes to the financial statements

Independent auditor’s report

56

57

63

104

Statutory information

Financial calendar and directory

109

118

Contents

This annual report is published as part of a reporting

suite, which also includes our climate-related disclosures

report and greenhouse gas emissions inventory report.

All three reports are available at vector.co.nz.

CLIMATE-RELATED

DISCLOSURES

2025

2025 REPORTING SUITE

Smart moves

ANNUAL REPORT 2025

GREENHOUSE

GAS EMISSIONS

INVENTORY

REPORT 2025


5

Performance snapshot
Financial and operational dashboard

INDICATORPERFORMANCE AND NOTES

Dividend25 cents per share full-year dividend

New dividend policy linked to cash flow and aligned

with five-yearly regulatory cycle (available at

vector.co.nz/investors/dividends)

Capital expenditure$470.1 million for continuing operations

Adjusted EBITDA

1

$401.1 million for continuing operations, up 16%

Profit$154.7 million net profit after tax

INDICATORPERFORMANCE AND NOTES

Electricity connections632,106

Gas connections120,621

Electricity resilience

and reliability

>2,000 km of network inspected by drones

12 projects completed to boost resilience and future

capacity in Auckland

INDICATORPERFORMANCE AND NOTES

Smart meter data intervals1.7 billion data intervals assessed on Diverge

platform, applying market rules to ensure accuracy,

processed significantly faster than previous systems

Customer engagement10,577 completed surveys or interviews with

customers, providing direct feedback on our

services, complementing further insights from

conversational analytics

Network inspections More than 43,000 power poles inspected using

130,000 images, along with artificial intelligence to

survey and assess condition

1. EBITDA from continuing operations adjusted for fair value changes, associates, third-party contributions, and significant one-off gains, losses, revenues and/

or expenses. Refer to the Non-GAAP reconciliation on page 55. Adjusted EBITDA excludes the capital contributions customers pay for new connections on the

network.

SHAREHOLDER:

CUSTOMER:

DATA:

Vector Annual Report 20256

Performance snapshot

ESG dashboard
Governance

– we disclose comprehensive governance information on page 26.

INDICATORPERFORMANCE AND NOTES

2030 carbon emissions

reduction target (scope 1 and 2,

excluding electricity line losses)

Achieved target five years early (55% emissions

reductions achieved in FY2025)

Scope 3 emissions744, 316 tCO

2

e (55% reduction from FY2020 baseline)

Internal carbon price$140 per tCO

2

e

Climate resilience investmentAround $300 million in climate resilience projects

in our 2025 electricity asset management plan,

including more than 50 resilience projects or

programmes of work

Electric vehicles54,135 electric vehicles on our network,

up 5,703 from FY2024

INDICATORPERFORMANCE AND NOTES

Talent pipeline64 critical roles identified, as part of our talent

pipeline development strategy

Future talent strategic collaborations established

with 3 organisations

Development and succession planning underway

Leadership development78% of people leaders attended at least

one development activity

CommunityHome energy saver programme completed on 724

households in collaboration with Auckland Council

Contractor safetyQuarterly workshops with contractors to support

an open learning environment

ENVIRONMENT:

SOCIAL:

7

Performance snapshot

Chair and group
chief executive report

New Zealand’s energy landscape has been

extremely dynamic over the past year

as a consequence of challenges such as

severe weather events, affordability, and

scrutiny on sector performance, and its

importance to businesses and households.

Alongside this, global trends for the

energy sector continue to take shape and

require agility, like technology and digital

innovation, evolving customer demand

patterns and behaviour. We’re engaging

consistently with the Government as

they, and regulators, execute reviews into

the structure, performance, and rules of

the energy sector. It’s critical that the

right policy and settings are in place to

enable the industry to manage the energy

transition effectively, and it’s clear that

change from the status quo is needed.

Our Symphony strategy remains focused on putting

the customer at the centre of our decisions. We’re

acutely aware of the importance of getting the balance

right between affordability and prudent, efficient

investment given the cost-of-living pressure many

of our customers are facing.

Our focus remains on providing a reliable, resilient,

secure energy supply and our long-term planning to

do this is influenced by rapid technological change

and shifting customer behaviour. We’ve responded

by thinking beyond traditional solutions and grasping

the opportunities that come with these developments.

We continue to focus on innovation, embracing AI,

harnessing data, and deepening our understanding

of customer needs, now and into the future.

Our business portfolio has continued to evolve. The

completion of the sales of Natural Gas Trading, Vector

Ongas and our shareholding in Liquigas are examples

of successful transactions that align with the risk and

future operating environment of each business. The

completed transactions enable us to concentrate on the

core strengths and demands of our regulated electricity

and gas networks and explore growth opportunities,

such as through Vector Technology Solutions (VTS), or

our investment in metering business Bluecurrent.

On 1 August, after balance date for these results,

Vector announced via the New Zealand Stock Exchange

(NZX) the sale of HRV.

In the reporting period, our new five-yearly default price

quality path (DPP4) for the electricity network has taken

effect, on 1 April 2025. We’ve valued the engagement

we’ve had with the Commerce Commission as they

worked through this important regulatory milestone,

and we’re pleased to see recognition of the importance of

several of our long-standing focus areas, such as uplifts in

provisions for cyber resilience and customer engagement,

and an expanded innovation allowance scheme.

We’re well placed to continue our investment approach

under the new DPP, which is to avoid committing to

high levels of capital investment in areas where there

is significant uncertainty, or to cover short demand

peaks when there are other, less capital-intensive ways

to use available capacity and build network resilience.

What this means is that we’ve prioritised how we invest

capital to areas where we can have the most impact on

customers. For example, in the past year we’ve inspected

more than 2,000 km of network using drones, and

completed 12 projects to boost resilience and future

capacity in the CBD.

Our commitment to Auckland’s growth and electrification

remains strong, and the region continues to grow despite

the broader economic slowdown. While we’ve seen a

softening in the rate of new connections this year, and

fewer private electric vehicles being sold, Auckland is

experiencing rising demand for hyperscale data centre

connections, each with significant energy requirements

(see Data Centres on p10).

In 2020, we set a target to reduce direct emissions

(scope 1 and 2, excluding electricity line losses) by 53.5%

by 2030, aligned with the Science Based Targets initiative

(SBTi) to limit warming to below 1.5°C. This year we

recorded a reduction of 55%, which is calculated against

the businesses we have now, meaning it reflects our

actual emissions reductions, not those from businesses

we’ve sold. This was driven by innovation in technology

and processes, which were mapped on our publicly

available carbon cost abatement curve, and which

we’ve progressively actioned. While some efforts fell

short, others are now embedded in our operations –

such as our gas sniffer trucks which proactively locate

leaks on our gas distribution network. We’ll continue to

focus on our emissions targets and we recognise there

could be some volatility in maintaining and improving

our overall emissions.

Vector Annual Report 20258

Chair and group chief executive report

Group financial performance
1


Earnings

FY2025 adjusted earnings before interest, tax, depreciation

and amortisation (adjusted EBITDA

2

) for continuing

operations were up $55.8 million or 16% to $401.1 million.

Capital contributions from customers for new connections

are excluded from our adjusted EBITDA figure. Our new

five-year regulatory price period began on 1 April 2025,

resulting in higher revenue in the final quarter to 30 June

2025, in line with the uplift provided by the Commerce

Commission under the new DPP; this reflects the increase

in interest rates and inflation experienced within the prior

DPP3 period. We’ve also maintained prudent financial

management across the group.

Profit

Group net profit after tax for continuing operations was

$154.7 million, inclusive of a $37 million impairment of

the gas distribution business. Underlying profit, excluding

the impairment, was $191.7 million. The impairment

recognises our latest forecasts for gas network connections,

where we see a decline in net connections from FY2026,

as a result of significant market uncertainty, scarcity of gas

and rising costs. Following the impairment, the carrying

value of the gas distribution business is consistent with

the estimated value of the regulated asset base.

DOUG MCKAY

CHAIR

SIMON MACKENZIE

GROUP CHIEF EXECUTIVE

1. During the financial year, we completed the sale of the businesses within

our prior Gas Trading segment, including Natural Gas Trading (1 July 2024),

Ongas (31 January 2025) and Liquigas (31 January 2025). These businesses

have been classified as discontinued operations in these full-year results.

2. EBITDA from continuing operations adjusted for fair value changes,

associates, third-party contributions, and significant one-off gains, losses,

revenues and/or expenses. Refer to the Non-GAAP reconciliation on page 55.

SYMPHONY STRATEGY

As we’ve noted in our previous annual reports,

our Symphony strategy helps us navigate and

shape the energy transition, aiming to deliver a

more efficient network that is reliable, safe and

ready for the future, recognising the challenge of

affordability. There are five pillars to Symphony:

leading the New Zealand energy transition;

evolving our core infrastructure; embracing data

and insights; putting our customers at the heart;

and investing in our people. During the past year

we’ve seen continued progress under each of

these pillars.

Chair and group chief executive report

9

These forecasts reflect the unprecedented uncertainty
around the future of natural gas, driven in the near

term by significant market uncertainty, scarcity of

gas and rising costs, and in the long term by lack of

clarity over how gas distribution businesses will be

impacted by New Zealand’s 2050 net-zero emissions

targets. Current regulatory settings were designed in a

more stable environment, where demand for gas was

growing, and we are urging the Commerce Commission

to update these to recognise this uncertainty and

ensure any shift away from gas protects the interests

of consumers and other stakeholders. A new draft gas

DPP is expected to be announced by the Commission

in November 2025 (with a final DPP announced in May

2026), and we are participating fully in the process so

the Commission understands our perspective both

for investors and customers.

Capital expenditure

Total capital expenditure for continuing operations was

$470.1 million, down $29.1 million, reflecting a number

of factors including the timing of large projects. Within

this capital expenditure we recognised $210.5 million

of capital contributions from customers, which is up

$15.2 million on the year before.

Dividend

As we announced in our half-year results in February

2025, the board has approved revisions to the dividend

policy, linking to cash flow. The intent is to align the

policy with the Commerce Commission’s five-yearly

regulatory cycle, as this is a large part of what determines

our revenue and earnings in each five-year period.

The board has determined an unimputed final dividend

of 13 cents per share, taking the full year dividend to

25 cents per share. This represents an 85% payout of

free cash flow, in the mid-point of the 70-100% range as

stated in our policy. Shareholders should not interpret

this year’s payout as being an indication that future

dividends will be in the midpoint of the range.

STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIPS FOR

INNOVATION

An example of embracing strategic partnerships

to innovate for better customer outcomes is the

expansion of GridAware, a new AI tool that is

reinventing the way we inspect and maintain the

electricity network. This project, developed as part

of our partnership with X (Google’s innovation lab)

and Tapestry, X’s energy moonshot, complements

the Grid Planning Tool for Distribution, another

AI tool from Tapestry that aims to transform

our forward planning by enabling much faster

scenario testing for future impacts such as EV

uptake, rooftop solar and data centre growth. How

GridAware helps boost efficiency in our network

maintenance programme is set out on page 23.

The Commerce Commission has acknowledged

the customer benefit from this innovative project,

awarding us an Innovation Project Allowance for

the GridAware project within the regulatory year to

31 March 2025.

DATA CENTRES

Auckland is experiencing rising demand for

hyperscale data centre connections, each with

significant energy requirements. These complex

projects offer major opportunities for the region,

and for New Zealand more broadly. For example,

hyperscale data centres typically request 20 Mega

Volt-Amperes (MVA) in the first phase of multi-

stage developments, which is roughly equivalent

to 8,000 homes. However, they are accompanied

by uncertainty about the rate at which electricity

demand will grow to meet the capacity requested,

since this depends on the adoption of data centre

services by the data centre’s clients. We know

these hyperscale data centre requests will drive

a need for us to invest in system growth, but we

must ensure our investment is moving in step

with demand. Because of the scale of some of

these projects, their impacts may not be confined

just to our distribution network, and may also

affect electricity generation and transmission;

so, careful and coordinated planning is critical.

Business performance

With the successful completion of a number of

transactions, we’re now reporting financial results under

a new segment structure: electricity performance is

detailed on page 22 and gas distribution on page 24.

Our investment in Bluecurrent has performed in line

with expectations, with distributions received from the

investment recognised in our financial statements within

cash flows.

We’re continuing to improve our cyber security

capabilities and make these available to others via our

Equalise product offering, with further sign-ups in the

New Zealand electricity distribution sector occurring

during the past year.

Vector Fibre has performed to expectations and is the

subject of a previously announced strategic review, with

Barrenjoey Capital Partners assisting in the process.

Highlights from the year for VTS are set out on page 25.

Electricity network regulatory performance

Our regulatory performance year runs to 31 March and

includes measures that track the reliability of service we

provide to our customers. In the most recent regulatory

period, the 12 months to 31 March 2025, our network

performance was within the regulatory limits for reliability,

for both planned service interruptions (for example, where

we shut power off temporarily to do work on the network

safely) and unplanned service interruptions (for example,

where a car hits a power pole and disables power until we

can repair it).

In the first three months of the current regulatory

period, 1 April to 30 June 2025, the Auckland region

once again experienced a significant weather event with

Cyclone Tam, which delivered torrential rain and severe

storms, followed by an intense and damaging lightning

storm. These conditions caused widespread disruption,

including power outages for our customers, and placed

considerable pressure on our network operations.

Unplanned service interruptions in this quarter were

higher than for the previous period, largely because of

the impact from this event.

Vector Annual Report 202510

Chair and group chief executive report

Regulatory reform and market structure
Recent decisions by the Electricity Authority on

connection processes mark a shift in how new

electricity network connections will be managed. We

support efforts to streamline and clarify these processes

and remain committed to advocating for reforms that

are fair, efficient and do not impose unexpected costs

on existing customers.

We await with great interest the release of the Frontier

report which the Government has commissioned to help

with its review into the electricity market. Vector has

taken an active interest in the process and will continue

to provide input into important issues such as security

of supply, and an efficient market for customers.

The DPP4 regulatory cycle for electricity distribution

networks has seen electricity network assets being

repriced by the Commerce Commission to reflect

higher interest rates and COVID-19 inflation impacts.

This has resulted in price increases, which we recognise

is hard on all consumers, however in real terms our

electricity lines charges remain very similar to what

they were more than ten years ago.

Looking ahead

We are strongly committed to helping lead

New Zealand’s energy transformation, using data

and AI to bring together commercial, customer and

operational insights, and drive better outcomes.

This view is shaping how we plan, invest and serve our

customers. We’re building our own AI capability and

attracting strong interest from applicants eager to join

our team. Our people are becoming more sophisticated

in using these tools, learning from global best practice

and applying it to local challenges.

CEO DEPARTURE

In February we announced that group chief executive

Simon Mackenzie had decided to step down.

Mr Mackenzie will depart his role at the end of 2025.

Mr Mackenzie has been Vector’s group chief

executive since 2008. In that time he has led the

development and growth of competitive businesses

such as Vector Metering (now Bluecurrent) and

Ongas, delivering significant shareholder value;

forged unique partnerships with AWS and Tapestry,

the energy moonshot at X (Google’s innovation lab)

to harness the use of technology and data; overseen

the investment in the electricity and gas networks

to meet Auckland’s growth and adapt to the impacts

of climate change; driven a culture of innovation

including participation in trials of early technologies

such as solar and batteries; grew the Vector portfolio

through acquisitions of competitive businesses

and divested for value creation and strategic

alignment; and set up VTS to pursue opportunities

in New Zealand and globally.

In announcing his departure, Mr Mackenzie said,

“The time is right for me to hand over – with Vector

in a strong position financially, and a great culture,

innovative mindset and talented leadership across

the business.”

The board thanks Mr Mackenzie for his years of

service to Vector and its shareholders. Board chair

Doug McKay said that Mr Mackenzie’s contribution

and achievements have been significant: “Simon is an

outstanding chief executive and a highly respected

Vector and industry leader. He has successfully led

Vector’s regulated and competitive businesses in a

complex environment and has contributed to the

wider energy industry through his leadership and

extensive sector experience. The board wishes him

well for the future and is grateful for his ongoing

support while the recruitment process continues.”

A recruitment process is currently underway and

the market will be updated when an appointment

is made.

We’re proud to partner with globally innovating

organisations, such as X, the moonshot factory, giving

our teams access to cutting-edge expertise and

collaborative learning. These partnerships are helping

us deepen our culture of innovation, which is grounded

in curiosity, capability and customer focus. It’s not just

about technology; it’s also about mindset, culture and the

way we work together to enable a smarter, more resilient

energy future.

Doug McKay

Chair

Simon Mackenzie

Group Chief Executive

11

Chair and group chief executive report

Environmental,
Social and

Governance

(ESG)

Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG)

12

Vector Annual Report 2025

Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG)
13

People, health and safety
Our Symphony strategy calls for

innovation and new solutions

to meet the challenges of an

increasingly complex energy

system, where demand for key

skills such as engineering, digital

and data is increasing significantly.

This is happening not just across

other energy companies within

New Zealand but globally too.

Traditional engineering is still vital

to our industry, but we must add

new capabilities to maximise the

opportunities ahead. Recognising

and staying ahead of this skill

adaptation is the basis for our people

strategy, and we’ve continued to

make progress this year.

Symphony capabilities

In our 2024 annual report we noted

the introduction of new behaviours

that supported a need to evolve

the way we work. This year, we’ve

built on these behaviours by going

further and identifying the specific

capabilities needed to deliver our

Symphony strategy, drawing on

our behaviours, global skills trends

and the critical skills needed for the

energy transition.

This has created a strong framework

for a structured approach to

strategic workforce planning, where

we’ve begun mapping the skills

and competencies of our current

workforce, identifying gaps at both

individual and functional levels,

and developing plans to address

these gaps through strategic

training, upskilling and recruitment

as vacancies become available.

We identified about 10% of roles

across Vector as critical to our core

operations, strategic goals, revenue,

compliance, and operational

continuity, and we’re focused on

ensuring there is a strong talent

pipeline for these roles.

“ The support from the

team, the open

communication, and the

overall work environment

have all contributed to a

very positive experience.

I feel valued and

motivated, and I

appreciate the

opportunities to grow

and contribute.’’

Employee feedback from Vector’s

eNPS survey

Vector Annual Report 202514

People, health and safety

Talent and leadership
development

We’ve continued a strong focus on

talent development this year, with a

multi-layered leadership programme

for new, seasoned and senior leaders

supporting the development of

leadership competencies and team

member coaching capabilities. We

had strong participation this year,

with 78% of our people leaders

taking part in development activities.

We complement this by strategic

collaborations with corporate learning

providers to design programmes to

our specific needs and run talks with

global and local speakers to engage

and upskill our people.

Strengthening our talent

pipeline

We’re proactively building a diverse

and talented pipeline of people who

want to come and work for us and

are engaged and motivated when

vacancies arise. We’re doing this with

a particular focus on specialist roles

in engineering, digital and data that

are critical to the energy transition.

Our approach includes building

relationships with universities in

support of a dynamic graduate

programme focused on strategic

capability, as well as looking further

back than recent graduates to target

talent who may still be deciding

which qualifications they want to

acquire and which fields to enter.

We’ve joined the Aruhiko Power

Engineering Excellence Trust, which

encourages students in the field of

power systems engineering with

scholarships, experiences in the

field and connections with industry

employers. We’ve also engaged in an

internship programme with Stanford

University, hosting two interns

from the Stanford Doerr School of

Sustainability. This programme was

implemented with the support of the

University of Auckland.

We recognise that the energy sector

as a whole is going through a skills

transition, and so we also participate

in industry collaborations, where

relevant for Vector and where we’re

confident we can advance our

specific needs.

Vector, along with 10 other

companies, is on the steering

committee for the electricity sector

member association, the Electricity

Engineering Association’s (EEA) Re-

Energise workforce initiative, which

focuses on preparing the workforce

for the energy transition. This project

will provide strategic and actionable

recommendations to ensure the

industry is ready to meet future

challenges and technologies.

Driving performance excellence

Our performance management

framework is focused on clarity

of direction, acknowledging our

people’s performance and reinforcing

our culture. We run a 12-month

performance management cycle with

a mid-year check-in.

To support consistency of end-of-

year reviews and ratings, we hold

calibration sessions across the

business. Employees and managers

are evaluated not only on what

they delivered but also on how they

delivered it, informed by Vector’s

behaviours.

FROM STANFORD

TO VECTOR

This winter, Vector welcomed two

interns from Stanford University.

The internship came about after

Stanford’s School of Sustainability,

together with All Birds founder

Tim Brown, went looking to

connect students with purpose-

driven companies around the

world. Four organisations were

chosen to host interns, including

Vector. Hosting interns from

top universities generates fresh

ideas and perspectives and is

a great way to showcase our

culture and the opportunities

on offer for career development.

The interns’ projects feed into

Vector’s strategic direction with

a focus on electricity demand-

response policies around the

globe, and understanding to

what extent time-of-use plans

change Aucklanders’ electricity

consumption.

“ The coaching is

definitely pushing my

thinking in both

professional and

personal development.’’

A people leader’s feedback about one

of Vector’s leadership development

programmes

15

People, health and safety

Engagement and wellbeing
In the past year our three regular

surveys, which are employee

engagement, employee Net

Promoter Score (eNPS), and wellbeing,

were all above benchmarks. Our

engagement programme is informed

by data and shaped by what our

people are telling us, and so these

results are a significant validation of

our approach and its contribution

towards our positive culture where

our people are supported to do their

best work. In our engagement survey

this year, 87% of our people said they

are proud to work for Vector.

Health safety and

environmental (HSE)

Ensuring the health and safety of our

staff, those delivering work on our

behalf and the public is paramount

at Vector. We’re committed to

continuous improvement of our health

and safety culture and performance

and we’re proud of the progress we’ve

made to support this in the past year.

This includes: scheduled quarterly

safety forums with our key contracting

partners to promote an open learning

environment focused on the most

important preventative measures to

minimise harm, enhancing in-field

critical risk control verifications and

embedding a new HSE Incident

Management System to better track

corrective actions, and improvements

in shared learning from high potential

events to ensure insights are identified

and critical controls continue to be

improved. We’ve also consulted

with key internal stakeholders and

contracting partners to inform the

revision of our HSE system.

These initiatives have contributed to

a reduction in both Lost Time Injury

Frequency Rate (LTIFR) and Total

Recordable Injury Frequency Rate

(TRIFR) compared to the year before,

and to the introduction of measurable

critical risk lead indicators for the

coming year. For the past 12 months,

the LTRIFR was 3.0 and the TRIFR 6.9

(these figures include HRV, which

was sold after balance date).

A robust audit and assurance

programme supports our approach

which includes internal first – and

second – line defence activity, third-

party assessment and retaining

our ISO accreditation in ISO45001

Health and Safety Management

Systems, ISO14001 Environmental

Management Systems and NZS7901

Public Safety.

“ Vector has demonstrated a strategic and data-driven

approach to employee wellbeing and psychosocial

risk management. Through our long-standing

partnership with them and annual wellbeing Pulse

surveys (2022 to 2025), they’ve shown consistent

improvements in resilience, organisational support,

and key work factors. Since their 2022 psychosocial

risk assessment, their practices have matured

significantly, with ongoing refinement and iteration.

Their commitment is evident in both leadership

engagement and staff feedback, positioning them

as a proactive leader in the wellbeing space. While

challenges remain, their continuous efforts to

improve are commendable and reflect a genuine

investment in their people. It is a privilege to work

with leaders who truly care about their people, are

eager to learn how to support mental health, and

are committed to helping others when they see

someone struggling.”

Dr Dougal Sutherland, Principal Psychologist, Umbrella Wellbeing

ANNUAL EMPLOYEE

SATISFACTION

SURVEY RESULTS

BENCHMARK

AMONG GLOBAL

ENERGY COMPANIES VECTOR RESULT

Employee engagement 70%


Above benchmark

eNPS (Net Promoter Score)15


Above benchmark

Vector Annual Report 202516

People, health and safety

EMPLOYEES BY ETHNICITYEMPLOYEES BY AGEEMPLOYEES BY GENDER
There were no notable movements in the year, apart from a 3% increase in the proportion of female employees following

the sale of Ongas.

* Middle East, Latin America and Africa.

11.5%

20-29

28.9%

30-39

29.1%

40-49

18.4%

50-59

10.3%

60+

1.9%

UNKNOWN

35.4%

FEMALE

64.1%

MALE

0.5%

UNDISCLOSED

31%

18%

25%

3%

2%

5%

12%

4%

ASIAN

NZ EUROPEAN

NZ

MĀORI

OTHER

PASIFIKA

UNKNOWN

EUROPEAN

MELAA*

Engagement and advocacy

We’ve been active in raising

awareness and advocating on health

and safety matters this year, making

a joint submission on the proposed

Health and Safety at Work Act reform

in conjunction with the Business

Leaders’ Health and Safety Forum,

an organisation we’re a founding

member of.

We’ve continued public engagement

around key aspects of safety

associated with our assets, business

activities and worksites. Examples of

these include our public awareness

campaigns, together with targeted

stakeholder engagement, around

keeping safe when working near

electricity or gas assets – for example

when digging near electrical or gas

assets, working at height near power

lines and what to do if you encounter

downed power lines.

We’ve also been advocating strongly

to raise awareness of the minimum

safe distances from overhead lines for

new building activity, as set out in the

New Zealand Electrical Code of Practice

for Electrical Safe Distances (ECP34). The

issue of lack of awareness is becoming

increasingly concerning because we’ve

observed a rise in non-compliance since

recent intensification planning rule

changes have enabled building closer

to property boundaries. We’re working

constructively with the planning and

building industries to raise awareness

of the issue, but our view is that more

needs to be done to address this safety

issue. A common-sense approach would

see the safe distances included in the

Building Code, as today a building project

can receive a valid building and resource

consent but still be non-compliant with

ECP34. We’re advocating for this solution

with the Government because of our

serious concerns about safety.

CHALLENGE YOURSELF

Our series of Vector-wide “challenge

yourself” events were designed to

support upskilling in digital and data

by getting people excited, inspired and

curious about how they could make

better use of it in their roles. With

a strong focus on cross-functional

collaboration, our first event saw

teams come together to solve a series

of data-driven clues by applying data

insights in creative ways. For the

second event (pictured), we hosted a

series of rapid-fire conversations where

data leads and people from around

the business would talk through data

challenges and solutions.

17

People, health and safety

Sustainability
Vector is a climate reporting entity under the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013 and

is required to produce climate statements that comply with the Aotearoa New Zealand

Climate Standards (NZCS) 1, 2 and 3 issued by the External Reporting Board (XRB).

Our climate-related disclosures report considers

our climate-related risks and opportunities,

and, together with this annual report and our

greenhouse gas emissions inventory report,

comprises our annual reporting suite, available at

vector.co.nz/investors/reports.

Resilience

As climate change drives more extreme and damaging

weather, it’s even more critical that our electricity

infrastructure is resilient. Through the work we’ve done

with external climate scientists to understand physical

climate changes, together with our own expertise in

assessing the impact on our assets, we can develop

optional pathways for improved performance against

climate impacts. But each of these optional pathways

comes at additional cost. While our approach to

resilience investment aims to remove the most risk with

the lowest capital expenditure, we’re thinking ahead

about where and how more resilience could be built,

and how the costs of doing so could be met.

In this context we were pleased this year to see the

Government’s decisions on the long-awaited reform of

the tree trimming regulations. The changes will improve

the ability of electricity distribution businesses to assess

and manage hazardous trees around lines, and issue

notices requiring that they be removed by their owner.

This will help us protect our lines from trees, and so

protect our customers’ electricity supply; however,

the cost recovery challenges of tree trimming remain

unaddressed following these changes.

Carbon emissions

2030 emissions reduction target

In FY2021 we set an absolute emissions reduction

target, aligned with a methodology published by the

Science Based Target initiative (SBTi) at the time, though

not validated by the SBTi. That target is for Vector to

reduce its scope 1 and 2 emissions (excluding electricity

distribution losses) by 53.5% by FY2030 from an FY2020

baseline. The emissions reduction target does not rely

on any offsets.

This year, we achieved a 55% emissions reduction, hitting

our 2030 target five years early. While we’re proud of

this outcome, we’re resetting our focus on maintaining

these reductions and beginning to look beyond 2030

for further opportunities to reduce emissions in a

cost-efficient way. Main contributors to our emissions

reductions have been a decrease in methane leaks on

our gas pipelines through proactive surveying, and a

reduction in diesel generation in planned maintenance

projects. For more information, please refer to our

greenhouse gas emissions inventory report available at

vector.co.nz/reports.

Vector Annual Report 202518

Sustainability

1. Market-based method for electricity consumption. For further information on where market-based and location-based electricity emissions are included, see our
greenhouse gas emissions inventory report, available at vector.co.nz/reports.

Emissions inventory

Vector’s total emissions (including Scope 3 and including

electricity distribution losses) have also decreased by

54% since our base year FY2020. This is mainly because

of a wind-down of Vector’s Natural Gas Trading contracts,

and a reduction in natural gas consumption in the

Auckland region.

EMISSIONS

REDUCTIONS

TABLE

FY2020

(BASE YEAR)

FY2025CHANGE

Scope 122,93310,449-54%

Scope 2

1

33,08739,476 19%

Scope 31,656,403744,316 -55%

Total1,712,423794,241-54%

Due to the completion of the sales of Vector Ongas,

our shareholding in Liquigas, and some natural gas

trading contracts, our historic emissions inventory has

been recalculated to exclude these emissions. For more

information on the methodology, results, and emissions

recalculations over time, please see our greenhouse gas

emissions inventory report, at vector.co.nz/reports.

Emissions abatement for our scope 1 and 2

emissions target

In FY2022 we developed a carbon abatement cost curve

to help measure and understand our emissions reduction

targets (scope 1 and 2 excluding electricity distribution

losses) and actions available to Vector to contribute to

reaching those targets. This work identifies the financial

impact of potential carbon reduction activity across

scope 1 and 2 emissions, using an internal carbon cost

of $140 per tonne of carbon dioxide equivalent (tCO

2

e)

as a comparative ‘do nothing’ cost. This cost curve

was updated in the past year to reflect the progress

we’ve made.

Abatement

cost

$/tCO₂e/year

Abatement

potential

tCO₂e

Using mobile transformers as

opposed to diesel generators for

multi-day upgrades (2024)

Hybrid generator (in trial)

Transition remaining light

vehicle fleet to EV (2020 – 2027)

Transition vans and utes to

electric (when available)

3-month gas pipeline surveying (2027)

Vector headquarters to ‘6 Green Star’

building (2023)

Annual gas pipeline

surveying (2022)

6-month gas pipeline surveying (2024)

SF6

monitoring

Renewable-only

electricity (2023)

Uncosted emissions

Third-party

gas pipeline

damage

Public engagement on dial

before you dig (2023)

Completed

In progress

Planned

Other

fugitive

methane

Other

diesel

generation

$140/

tCO₂e

53.5%

Emissions

reduction

target

3-month high-pressure gas

pipeline surveying (2025)

Reducing unnecessary diesel

generation through process

optimisation (2021)

$0

-$1,000

-$2,000

$1,000

19

Sustainability

Business
segment

reports

Business segment reports

20

Vector Annual Report 2025

21
Business segment reports

Electricity
Adjusted EBITDA

Electricity adjusted EBITDA is up

$56.8 million or 19% to $351.9 million.

This result was driven by the

higher revenue, owing to pricing

adjustments and as a result of the

new DPP period which began on

1 April 2025, as well as because of

higher pass-through and recoverable

costs. Total operating expenses,

excluding pass-through charges,

were flat. This reflects our ongoing

commitment to efficient network

management.

Connection growth

Network connection numbers

have continued to grow, with total

electricity connections up 1.2% to

632,106. The rate of growth has

declined, with new connections 21.4%

lower than for the previous year, given

the broader economic slowdown.

Volumes

Electricity distributed volume was

down 1.4% compared to FY2024.

This largely correlates with warmer

temperatures in FY2025, with fewer

days when electricity was used

for heating.

Capital investment

Gross capital investment was

$25 million lower than for the last

12 months, at $432 million, reflecting

a number of factors including the

timing of large projects. Growth

capital investment was up $7.5 million

or 3%, with the majority of growth

capital investment funded by

customers causing the need for

investment, through $195.9 million

of capital contributions.

Smart maintenance

While overall capital expenditure

was down marginally, we continued

to invest in the maintenance of

the network and enhancing the

effectiveness of this maintenance

by optimising our investments and

leveraging technology.

This year we’ve leveraged technology

and strategic partnerships to replace

traditional ground-based field

inspections with aerial surveying

that captures much more detailed

and useful information than has

been possible before. Rather than

walking the lines, network inspectors

now conduct detailed assessments

from their desks by analysing high-

resolution images, Light Detection

and Ranging (LiDAR) and thermal

scans of network assets, captured

by drones and helicopters. This rich

asset information already means we’re

better able to validate asset condition

and improve our decision-making

on where to prioritise maintenance

investment. This has been enabled

through our strategic partnership with

X and, with the use of advanced AI,

has the potential to further increase

efficiency significantly (see break-out

box on page 23).

Delivering efficiently for our

customers

We’re keeping our focus on

delivering safe and reliable electricity

for customers as we see their

expectations for service rise, driven by

costs and changing behaviour such

as working from home. Requirements

around traffic management add

significant cost and time to our

projects, so we’re involved in trialling

a new, risk-based guideline for traffic

management, where site managers

will have more power to apply safety

measures that are reasonable for a

given situation. We’re hopeful the new

guidelines, due to come into force in

2026, will dramatically reduce costs for

our customers without compromising

safety. To avoid disruptions to our work

programmes, we’ve also kept our

attention on procurement processes

that mitigate what can be long times

for network equipment.

Vector Annual Report 202522

Electricity

Enabling network access
and reinforcing capacity

While the broader economic

slowdown has led to a softening

in the rate of new connection

growth, we’re seeing strong and

dynamic activity in the data centre

market, with changing connection

requirements driven by market

dynamics, and AI advancements.

We’re enabling growth in this market

by supporting customers’ planning

and development needs, and we’re

well-positioned to handle the

complexity and demand from the

sector by maintaining our proactive

investment in core network capacity.

We work closely with all customers

on their specific network connection

requests. In April we introduced

a new flexible commercial

connection option which provides

customers with an on-ramp towards

electrification by time-shifting

future capital improvements on

the network. This provides a better

understanding of the business case

and path towards electrification

for the customer, and a more

efficient use of the existing and

planned network.

Our position on who should pay for

the growth of the network remains

that those causing the growth

should pay for it. This underpins

our 100% recovery of connection

costs from connecting customers.

We believe this position is aligned

with the Electricity Authority’s

pricing principles, however the EA

is consulting on the methodology

for connection charges across

New Zealand, as we note on page 11.

Improving customer experience

through digital and data

This year, we’ve invested in building

our data and digital capability,

both in terms of bringing in specific

skills around AI, data science

and machine learning, as well as

deploying a modern data platform

to unlock advanced analytics and

further innovation.

This investment is already delivering

greater insights that improve our

ability to deliver better customer

experiences. One way it’s doing this is

through a new tool we’ve developed

that combines datasets from various

sources such as smart meters and

Optical Network Terminals, to help

us proactively identify individual

power outages following widespread

network damage caused by storms.

We’ve begun trialling this tool to help

us improve outcomes for customers.

Work has begun on the next stage

of a significant digital project to

introduce new capabilities into our

advanced distribution management

system. These new capabilities

comprise: an automated outage

management system, which will

predict the most likely fault location

and provide relevant information to

control room operators, and switch

order management, which reduces

reactive switching times through

the use of scenario analysis tools

and automatic safety checking. In

addition to improving core network

operations, these enhancements will

improve the information we provide

to our customers through our outage

centre, especially during storms, by

making it possible to supply updated

data much faster.

Network resilience

We’re investing in network

resilience against the impacts of

storms, such as Cyclone Tam which

occurred in April this year. Our

approach remains to do this smartly,

prioritising cost-effective actions,

such as infrastructure upgrading

to improve flood resilience at key

zone substations, and strengthening

electrical conductors. We’re acutely

aware of the need to strike the

right balance between investing

for resilience and ensuring the

cost burden for our customers

remains appropriate.

DRONES AND AI LEAD A REVOLUTION FROM POLES

TO PIXELS

We’re revolutionising how we maintain our electricity networks through

a strategic partnership with X, (Google’s innovation lab) and Tapestry, its

energy moonshot. By combining aerial technology with AI, Tapestry’s

GridAware platform is transforming traditional network inspections

from a manual ground-up process into an intelligent, automated system

that can spot wear and tear before it becomes a problem. This improves

network maintenance inspections so our customers can benefit from

more reliability, and sets a new standard for how we inspect and prioritise

maintenance on our network.

The aerial survey technology – from helicopters and drones – captures

precision images of our equipment, as well as other data like thermal

scans. With lots of high-quality data to hand, our network inspectors review

this back at their desks using GridAware and mark up images when they

spot something needs fixing. Two things happen next: we assess this rich

information to improve our decision-making on where to focus maintenance

investment, and we use it to train Tapestry’s AI to automatically conduct

condition assessments as more images are captured from elsewhere on

the network. It’s a powerful example of how technology, alongside Vector’s

experts, can solve real-world challenges, while making essential services

more resilient and efficient for the people of Auckland.

23

Electricity

Gas
distribution

Adjusted EBITDA

Gas distribution adjusted EBITDA is

up $1.9 million or 4% to $46.7 million,

as a result of pricing adjustments.

Operating expenses were relatively

flat overall compared to the previous

year. However, maintenance expenses

were higher, which is in line with

our strategy to optimise our asset

management approach in response

to our most recent demand forecasts

(see the break out box below).

Capital investment

Capital investment was down

$3.2 million or 14% to $19.0 million,

with $13.3 million of that expenditure

funded by customers through

capital contributions. The decrease

was driven by lower levels of

growth investment, reflected in

capital investment net of capital

contributions being 50% lower than

for the year before at $5.7 million.

This is in line with our strategy to

optimise our asset management

approach (see break-out box below).

Connections

There has been a 0.2% increase in

connections on our gas distribution

network over the year to 30 June

2025, bringing the total number of

connections to 120,621. However, new

gas connections were down 33% on

the previous year Total connections.

Volumes

Gas distribution volume was

down 8.5% at 11.9 PJ compared

to the previous years because of

lower demand from the residential,

industrial and commercial sectors.

Network and public safety

We’re proud that the past year has

again been one without any major

safety-related incident on our gas

network. We are committed to

delivering a safe, reliable and efficient

service and we focus not just on our

own asset management practices, but

also on engaging with the public and

customers to raise awareness of safe

working practices near our network.

Over recent years we’ve boosted our

proactive leak detection programme

using vehicle-mounted gas detection

equipment. This programme helps

us locate leaks faster, enabling us to

fix them quickly before impacts are

experienced by customers.

The programme has the added benefit

of reducing carbon emissions from

these leaks.

1. Our gas asset management plan is available on our website: vector.co.nz/about-us/regulatory.

SAFETY, RELIABILITY AND SERVICE IN AN ENVIRONMENT

OF DECLINING DEMAND

As we set out in our 2025 gas asset management plan (AMP)

1

, there is

unprecedented gas market uncertainty, scarcity of gas and rising costs. This

results in our connections forecast seeing customers disconnect at a faster rate

than new customers connect from FY2026, with new connections stopping in

FY2029.

Despite this, we remain dedicated to maintaining the reliability and security

of our gas distribution network, and our view remains that a long term solution

needs to be reached between government and network operators, as we

describe on page 10.

We’ve taken prudent steps to optimise our gas asset management strategies

to maintain network safety and reliability, while reducing asset stranding risk.

One of the ways we’re doing this is by reducing capital expenditure on asset

replacements (which is recovered over the life of the asset) and replacing this

with increased operational expenditure on maintenance (which is recovered

during a single financial year). Over time, this approach will see a reduction in

capital expenditure and a corresponding increase in operational expenditure.

We’re also calling for more to be done to provide certainty to help customers

and gas distribution businesses navigate the future.


Vector Annual Report 202524

Gas distribution

Over the past two years, VTS has
been live with Diverge, its next-

generation energy data platform.

As utilities around the world evolve

to meet the needs of the energy

transition, Diverge provides visibility

and insight at the edge of electricity

networks, where this visibility had

previously been limited.

Bluecurrent has served as

the primary deployment for

Diverge, where the platform has

demonstrated its capacity to scale

with the demands of the energy

sector. Since the introduction

of 5-minute electricity market

settlement rules in Australia, Diverge

has consistently processed six times

the volume of smart meter data

at ten times the speed of legacy

systems. Diverge has also been

delivering network operational data

to electricity distribution businesses

across New Zealand providing

insights that improve operations

and planning. In parallel, in the past

year Vector’s electricity business

has used Diverge to operationalise

data science, transforming analytical

models into practical tools that

inform important decisions and

strategic planning. This has included

managing electric bus charging

dynamically within available network

capacity, proactively detecting

network anomalies, such as incorrect

phase mapping, and understanding

electric vehicle charging using

advanced algorithms.

These commercial deployments

have validated Diverge’s underlying

architecture and have guided

ongoing product refinement.

VTS is now leveraging its success

with Bluecurrent and Vector to

bring Diverge to global utilities facing

similar challenges. VTS is partnering

with Slalom, a leading technology

consulting firm and a collaboration

with EDMI, a leading global smart

metering solutions provider. These

partnerships aim to accelerate

the roll-out of Diverge, combining

expertise in data, devices and

digital enablement.

Over the past 12 months, VTS has

demonstrated its capability to solve

problems on an international stage

and this has been received positively.

As a result, VTS has been invited

to participate in multiple formal

procurement processes, reflecting

growing demand for solutions that

can enable smarter, more responsive,

and data-driven networks.

The challenges faced by overseas

utilities are similar to those VTS has

already helped us solve locally, but

the scale is much larger. Through

the engagements VTS has had

this year, we’re seeing strong signs

it is well positioned to bridge the

gap between Vector’s internal

digital transformation and an

external product commercialisation

capability that has the potential to

help utilities globally.

Vector Technology

Solutions (VTS)

25

Vector Technology Solutions (VTS)

Governance report
This section of the annual report is an

overview of Vector’s corporate governance

framework, approved by the board, for the

financial year ended 30 June 2025.

Vector’s board is committed to maintaining high

standards of corporate governance, ensuring transparency

and fairness, and recognising the interests of our

shareholders and other stakeholders.

The board has an established set of guiding principles

that state that the company will:

–Be a leading commercial enterprise in New Zealand

with a reputation for delivering results through

sound strategy

–Have entrepreneurial agility, being the first to identify

opportunities and bring them to market

–Be a great employer which values knowledge and talent

–Strive to ensure that everyone who does work for

Vector goes home healthy and safe

–Deal fairly and honestly with its customers

–Be a good corporate citizen.

Vector’s governance practices are informed by the NZX

Listing Rules (NZX Rules), the NZX Corporate Governance

Code (31 January 2025) (NZX Code), the Financial Markets

Conduct Act 2013 and the Companies Act 1993. Vector’s

governance practices are consistent with the principles

in the NZX Code, except that Vector has not adopted a

formal protocol for responding to ‘control transactions’

takeovers (NZX Code Recommendation 3.6). Vector

has not adopted a formal protocol because Entrust

holds 75.1% of Vector’s shares; this means that:

–Any takeover offer would need to involve Entrust

–Any scheme of arrangement would require Entrust’s

approval.

Vector’s key corporate governance documents, including

board and committee charters and policies, can be found

at vector.co.nz/investors/governance.

Roles and responsibilities of the board

and management

The primary objective of the board is to protect and

enhance the value of Vector in the interests of Vector and

its shareholders.

The board has overall responsibility for all decision-making

within Vector. Vector’s governance practices are designed

to:

–Enable the board to provide strategic guidance for

Vector and effective oversight of management

–Clarify the roles and responsibilities of Vector’s

directors and senior executives to facilitate board

and management accountability to both Vector

and its shareholders

–Ensure a balance of authority so that no single

individual has unfettered powers.

To ensure that Vector’s business objectives and strategies

are achieved and to deliver value to the company and

its shareholders, the board strives to understand, meet

and appropriately balance the expectations of all its

stakeholders, including its employees, customers and the

wider community.

In carrying out its responsibilities and powers, the board

recognises its overriding responsibility to always act

honestly, fairly, diligently and in accordance with the law.

The board works to promote and maintain an environment

within Vector that establishes these principles as basic

guidelines for all its employees and representatives.

Vector achieves board and management accountability

principally through its board charter, which sets out

matters reserved for the board and responsibilities

delegated to the group chief executive, and a formal

delegation of authority framework. The effect of

this framework is that, while the board has statutory

responsibility for the activities of the company, this is

exercised through the delegation to the group chief

executive, who is accountable for the day-to-day

leadership and management of the company.

Vector Annual Report 202526

Governance report

The main functions of the board include:
–Reviewing and approving the strategic, business

and financial plans prepared by management

–Monitoring performance against the strategic,

business and financial plans

–Appointing, delegating to and reviewing the

performance of the group chief executive

–Approving major investments and divestments

–Ensuring ethical behaviour by the company, board,

management and employees

–Assessing its own effectiveness in carrying out its

functions.

The board charter sets out the expectation that all directors

continuously educate themselves to ensure that they may

perform their duties appropriately and effectively.

A committee or individual director may engage separate

independent professional advice in certain situations, at

the expense of the company, with the prior approval of the

chair of the board. The board also has access to executives

within the Vector group as a means of receiving expertise

and assurance information.

Each director has a duty to act in the best interests of the

company and the directors are aware of their collective

and individual responsibilities to stakeholders for the way

Vector’s affairs are managed, controlled and operated.

The board regularly assesses its effectiveness in carrying

out its functions and responsibilities. The board chair and

the committee chairs review and evaluate the board and

committees against their respective charters. The board

chair also engages with individual directors to evaluate

and discuss performance and professional development.

Externally facilitated reviews of the board’s performance,

including its committees, are carried out from time to

time. The board last participated in an externally facilitated

review in 2024.

The group chief executive is supported by the

Vector executive team. Details of the members of

the executive team are set out in the management

team section on pages 48 and 49 of this annual

report and in the About Us section of Vector’s website

(vector.co.nz/about-us/board-executive-team). Members of

the Vector executive team have regular access to the board.

Board membership

Vector’s board comprises experienced directors from

diverse backgrounds who govern the company on

behalf of its shareholders and other stakeholders. The

directors are committed to maintaining high standards

of corporate governance, ensuring transparency and

fairness and recognising the interests of stakeholders.

Vector’s constitution and the NZX Rules set certain

requirements in relation to the board structure. The board

must have a minimum of three and a maximum of nine

directors, with at least two being ordinarily resident in

New Zealand (as explained in section 3.1.6 of the NZX’s

Governance Guidance Note (January 2025)) and at least

two being ‘Independent Directors’ (as defined in the NZX

Rules). The board currently comprises seven directors,

all of whom are non-executive. Six of Vector’s directors

ordinarily reside in New Zealand and one director

ordinarily resides in Australia. Biographies are set out on

pages 46 and 47 of this report and include information on

the year of appointment, independence, skills, experience

and background of each director. The current directors

possess an appropriate mix of skills, expertise and diversity

to enable the board to discharge its responsibilities and

deliver the company’s strategic priorities, as illustrated

in the skills and experience matrix on page 28. The board

recognises that a regular refreshment programme leads

to the introduction of new perspectives, skills, attributes

and experience and the board also has regular regard for

succession planning for its roles. As required, the board

strengthens its oversight of issues in all disciplines by

seeking expert advice.

27

Governance report

Board skills and experience
STRATEGIC FOCUSDESCRIPTIONNUMBER OF DIRECTORS

LeadershipSenior leadership experience, board director

and executive

Leadership

Strategy Strategy and commercial acumen

Strategy

CustomerCustomers and community

Customer

EnergyEnergy industry experience

Energy

ESGSocial and environmental, climate change,

ESG, sustainability

ESG

PeoplePeople and culture, workforce, remuneration

and talent

People

GovernanceGovernance, risk and compliance

Governance

RegulatoryRegulatory and government policy

Regulatory

FinanceFinancial acumen

Finance

TechnologyTechnology, cyber security, AI, data

Technology

Digital innovationDigital evolution, transformation and

innovation

Digital innovation


EXPERT


ADVANCED


CAPABLE


LIMITED

Vector Annual Report 202528

Governance report

Director independence
The nominations committee has responsibility on

behalf of the board for making determinations as to the

independence status of all directors on an ongoing basis.

The committee’s assessment of independence is guided

by the NZX Rules and NZX Code Recommendation 2.4.

The board has reviewed the position and relationships

of all directors in office and considers that five of the

non-executive directors are independent directors for

the purposes of the NZX Rules and NZX Code. Those

directors are Doug McKay (who is Vector’s chair), Vaughan

Busby, Dame Paula Rebstock, Bruce Turner and Anne

Urlwin. Dr Paul Hutchison and Alastair Bell represent

Vector’s majority shareholder Entrust and are therefore

not independent directors because of that association.

Directors are required to inform the board of all relevant

information which may affect their independence.

Only independent, non-executive directors are eligible

to be the board chair. The roles of board chair, audit

committee chair, risk and assurance committee chair,

people and remuneration committee chair and group

chief executive are each held by different people.

Ownership of Vector securities by directors is not a

requirement. Directors’ ownership interests are listed

on pages 114 and 116 of this annual report.

Director period of appointment

0-3 YEARS3-9 YEARS9 YEARS +

Number of

directors250

Board committees

There are four standing board committees: an audit

committee, a nominations committee, a people and

remuneration committee and a risk and assurance

committee. Members of each committee may be

recommended by the nominations committee and are

appointed by the board. Each committee has a written

charter that is approved by the board and sets out its

mandate. The charters are reviewed regularly (usually

biennially), with any proposed changes recommended

to the board for approval. All charters are available on

Vector’s website. The board may also form additional ad

hoc committees as needed and committees relating to

the electricity and gas asset management plans met

during the reporting period. The company secretary

has unfettered access to the chairs of the board and

the committees.

The members and chairs of each committee as at 30 June 2025:

COMMITTEEMEMBERS

Audit committeeAnne Urlwin (chair)

Alastair Bell

Paula Rebstock

Nominations committeeDoug McKay (chair)

Paula Rebstock

Paul Hutchison

People and remuneration committee Paula Rebstock (chair)

Alastair Bell

Bruce Turner

Risk and assurance committee*Bruce Turner (chair)

Paul Hutchison

Anne Urlwin

* Vaughan Busby was appointed to this committee after the reporting period, on 22 August 2025.

In addition to the committee members, the other directors have standing invitations to attend committee meetings.

The group chief executive, management and other guests are regularly invited by the relevant chair to attend board and

committee meetings also. Employees of Vector can only attend audit committee meetings by invitation.

29

Governance report

Attendance at meetings
Attendance records of board and committee meetings are provided in the table below.


COMMITTEEFULL BOARD

AUDIT

COMMITTEE

RISK AND

ASSURANCE

COMMITTEE

PEOPLE AND

REMUNERATION

COMMITTEE

NOMINATIONS

COMMITTEEAGM

TOTAL MEETINGS1364341

A Bell 13632***1

V Busby**1

B Hassall*21

P Hutchison 124***41***41

D McKay (chair) 136***4


3***41

P Rebstock 135


1***341

B Turner 135***432***1

A Urlwin 1363


1


2***1

* Retired 26 September 2024.

** Appointed 13 June 2025.

*** Director attending the committee meeting who is not a member of the committee.

† Director retired as a committee member, 24 October 2024.

‡ Director was appointed a committee member, 24 October 2024.

Note that full board meetings include ten board meetings and three ‘deep dive’ meetings.

Audit committee

The purpose of the audit committee is to assist the

board in fulfilling its responsibilities for the quality and

integrity of Vector’s external financial and climate-related

reporting, the independence and performance of the

external auditors, and effectiveness of the internal control

system for financial and climate-related reporting and

accounting records.

The audit committee provides a formal forum for

communication between the board and the external

auditors, ensures the independence of the external

auditors, has oversight of audit planning, reviews and

recommends audit fees, considers audit opinions and

evaluates the performance of the external auditors.

Oversight of the company’s external audit arrangements

to safeguard the integrity of financial reporting is the

responsibility of the audit committee. Included within the

audit committee’s responsibilities set out in its charter

is the requirement to ensure that audit independence is

maintained, both in fact and appearance.

The NZX Rules, NZX Code and the audit committee’s

charter require that the audit committee must comprise at

least three members, all being non-executive directors of

Vector, at least one of whom should be both independent

and have an adequate accounting or financial background,

and the majority of whom must be independent

as determined by the board. The chair must be an

independent director and cannot be the chair of the board.

Two members of Vector’s audit committee have specialist

financial skills and experience.

Risk and assurance committee

The purpose of the risk and assurance committee is to

assist the board in fulfilling its responsibilities to ensure

Vector manages its risks and compliance appropriately,

including through overseeing Vector’s risk management

framework and policies. The risk and assurance

committee charter requires this committee to comprise

at least three members, being directors of Vector, at least

two of whom must be independent.

People and remuneration committee

Vector has a people and remuneration committee as

discussed in the remuneration report on page 37.

Nominations committee

The purpose of the nominations committee is to

assist the board in fulfilling its responsibility to have

an efficient mechanism for the director selection,

appointment and retention practices of the company

(including coordinating director appointments with

Entrust, consistent with Entrust’s rights under Vector’s

constitution) and for the appointment and succession of

the group chief executive. All new directors enter into a

written agreement with Vector, which sets out the terms

of their appointment.

The NZX Code and the nominations committee’s charter

require that the nominations committee must comprise

at least three members, being directors of Vector, the

majority of whom should be independent directors.

Vector Annual Report 202530

Governance report

External auditor
The role of the external auditor is to audit the financial

statements of the company in accordance with applicable

auditing standards in New Zealand and to report on its

findings to the board and shareholders of the company.

While a policy of periodic rotation of external audit firm is

not mandated at Vector, the effectiveness, performance

and independence of the external auditor is reviewed

at least annually by the audit committee. The board,

after considering the recommendations of the audit

committee, considers and reviews the appointment of

external auditors. The board requires the rotation of the

key audit partner for the statutory audit after no more

than five years. The company’s external auditor is KPMG,

who has been Vector’s auditor since FY2003. Matt Diprose

has been the audit partner since FY2025 and Laura

Youdan has been the assurance partner since 2018. All

services provided by KPMG are considered on a case-by-

case basis by the audit committee to ensure there is no

actual or perceived threat to independence in accordance

with the external auditor independence policy. The audit

partner and assurance partner have provided the audit

committee with written confirmation that, in their view,

they were able to operate independently during the

year. KPMG has provided the board with the required

independence declaration for the financial year ended

30 June 2025. The audit committee has determined that

there are no matters that have affected the auditor’s

independence. The external auditor’s independence

policy also contains guidelines for what services (other

than the statutory audit role) the external auditor can

provide. It is the board’s policy that all non-audit services

proposed to be undertaken by the external auditor must

be pre-approved by the audit committee. The audit

committee considered and gave its approval for the

auditor to undertake certain non-audit-related matters.

Fees paid to KPMG are included in Note 8 of the notes

to the financial statements contained on page 73 of this

annual report. KPMG was paid $1.5 million for services in

the financial year to 30 June 2025. Of this sum, $1.4 million

was for audit-related services and $0.1 million was for non-

audit-related services. Non-audit-related work did not

exceed 25% of the amount paid for audit work. The auditor

is regularly invited to meet with the audit committee

including without management present.

The auditor has been invited to attend the annual

shareholders’ meeting and will be available to answer

questions about the audit process and the independence

of the auditor.

Risk management

Vector recognises that rigorous risk management is

essential for corporate stability, high performance and

the success of its strategic objectives and vision. To drive

sustainable growth and ensure operational resilience,

it is important to anticipate risks to its business while

capitalising on opportunities as they arise.

Vector’s enterprise risk management (ERM) framework

provides a purpose-built and flexible approach to the

application of risk management across Vector and

is consistent with the international risk management

standard ISO31000. Vector’s risk management

processes and tools are embedded within its business

operations to drive consistent, effective and accountable

decision-making.

Consistent with the ‘three lines model’, all Vector people

are responsible for applying Vector’s ERM framework

within their individual roles to proactively identify, analyse,

evaluate and treat risks. This risk mindset is promoted

through:

–The group risk function partnering with business

units to continue to enhance risk management at

operational, executive team and board levels

–Embedding of risk assessments and discussions

within key decision-making processes

–Continuous development through both internal and

external reviews.

Vector continues to review and mature its ERM

framework to reflect the evolving context within

which we work. The company engages external advisors

to assist in incorporating the latest developments in

risk management and to reflect the current operating

environment.

The board is responsible for ensuring that key strategic,

operational and financial risks are identified, and that

appropriate controls and procedures are in place to

manage those risks effectively. The risk and assurance

committee has overall responsibility for ensuring that

the company’s risk management framework and

processes are fit for purpose and effective, such that risks

are appropriately identified, considered and managed

against Vector’s objectives and strategic vision. Spanning

across Vector’s portfolio of businesses, Vector’s group risk

function is tasked with the ongoing development and

implementation of the ERM framework and risk processes.

In addition to monitoring the changing business

landscape and macro-economic trends, this function

works with Vector business units to facilitate smart risk-

based decision-making as well as risk analysis and the

evaluation of risk against Vector’s risk appetite. These

perspectives inform the development of the group key risk

profile which provides both the board and executive team

with a consolidated view of:

1) The strategically focused risks which could have

a significant impact on the long-term value and

sustainability of Vector’s business

2) The operational and financial risks which are assessed

and managed as part of meeting key business

objectives and maintaining operational resilience.

Vector’s group material risks are shown on page 32. Risks

1, 4, 5 and 6 include Vector’s risks in relation to the impacts

of climate change. Refer to Vector’s climate-related

disclosures report for information on its-related risks

and opportunities.

31

Governance report

Vector group’s material risks
1

Failure of the electricity network to adapt and

transition to changing demand in a way that achieves

affordability and efficient capital spend

2

Adverse or unanticipated government responses to

energy market failure and/or increased prices

3

Cyber security compromise

4

Adverse or unanticipated change to government policy

affecting the electricity or gas business, or legislative/

regulatory settings related to the Commerce Act 1986

(Part IV), Electricity Act 1992, Gas Act 1992, or Electricity

Industry Act 2010

5

External shock event, including natural disaster, major

weather events, pandemic and other external impacts

6

Adverse impacts, government responses and

unrealised opportunities from climate change

7

The rapid change and opportunity created from

utilising data and AI

8

Breach of SAIDI and SAIFI

9

Inability to develop, retain and recruit specialised talent

10

Serious harm or fatality event resulting from non-

performance of internal processes

11

Major/repeated disruption of electricity, gas and fibre

critical services through non-performance of internal

processes

12

Adverse mental health impacts that arise from

workplace factors

13

Failure to collect, protect or create value from

information and intellectual property

14

Reputational damage/adverse impacts on stakeholder

and customer confidence

15

Failure, poor performance and/or availability of critical

third parties (including service providers, suppliers and

partnerships)

16

Funding, liquidity, cash flow and credit risk because of

uncertain economic conditions and market risks

direct link to

Gas transition

Inability to efficiently manage peak

electricity load to avoid network

congestion

Energy platforms

Increase in extreme weather events

Refer to Vector’s climate-related disclosures report

Distributed energy resources

Climate-related risks

Climate-related opportunities

Vector Annual Report 202532

Governance report

Health and safety
Vector is committed to conducting its business activities

in such a way as to protect the health and safety of all

workers of Vector and its related companies, the public

and visitors in its work environment. Vector is committed

to continual and progressive improvement in its health

and safety performance. Page 16 of this annual report

contains Vector’s approach to performance in these areas,

including its proactive lead indicators and traditional lag

indicators of the Lost Time Injury Frequency Rate (LTIFR)

and the Total Recordable Injury Frequency Rate (TRIFR).

The board has delegated day-to-day responsibility for

the implementation of health and safety standards and

practices to management.

The board is committed to providing effective resources

and systems at all levels of the organisation to fulfil its

commitment to employees, customers, shareholders

and stakeholders.

Vector’s commitments and requirements for health and

safety are set out in the health and safety policy.

Internal audit

Vector’s business performance and internal audit function

is overseen by the risk and assurance committee, and

the audit committee, providing independent and

objective assurance on the effectiveness of governance,

risk management and internal controls across business

operations. The business performance and internal audit

team has unrestricted access to Vector’s businesses and

staff. The team liaises closely with KPMG, as Vector’s

external auditor, to share the outcomes of the internal

audit programme.

Ethical and responsible behaviour

Directors and employees are expected to act legally,

ethically, responsibly and with integrity in a manner

consistent with Vector’s policies, procedures and values.

The code of conduct and ethics covers a wide range of

areas and provides guidance regarding personal integrity,

business integrity, customers and society, people, and

assets and information. It outlines the responsibilities of

Vector’s people and explains the standards of conduct

and ethics. The code of conduct and ethics is highlighted

to new staff being inducted at Vector and is promoted

regularly within the company. The code of conduct and

ethics is generally reviewed every two years.

The procedure for advising the company of a suspected

breach is set out in the whistleblower policy. People at

Vector have a range of options to speak up if they notice

something that is not right, including raising a concern

with a relevant manager. Reporting can be in person, by

phone, email, post and online form and all options can be

done anonymously.

A comprehensive set of policies has been put in place to

assist directors, staff and contractors to act and make

decisions in an ethical and responsible manner.

The board has implemented formal procedures to handle

trading in Vector’s securities by directors and employees

of Vector in the securities trading policy, with approval

from the company secretary (on behalf of the company)

being required before trading can occur. The fundamental

rule in the policy is that trading with insider information is

prohibited at all times. The requirements of the policy are

separate from, and in addition to, the legal prohibitions on

insider trading in New Zealand. The policy provides that

shares may not be traded at any time by any individual

holding “material information” (as defined in the NZX

Rules). A blackout period prohibiting trading is imposed

for all directors, senior officers and certain other people

between the day before the half year and full year balance

dates and the first trading day after the release to NZX of

the financial results for that period.

Diversity and inclusion

The board’s commitment to creating and maintaining

both a diverse workforce and an inclusive workplace

for all employees is reflected in its diversity and

inclusion policy. A copy is available on Vector’s website

at vector.co.nz/investors/governance. A diversity,

inclusion and wellbeing council, made up of senior

management representatives, provides governance over

the implementation of the policy. Vector has dedicated

resources to drive the diversity, inclusion and wellbeing

programme of work.

The board is satisfied with the initiatives being

implemented by the Vector group and its performance

with respect to the diversity and inclusion policy.

Vector is committed to equitable pay and this does not

start and finish with gender; it also includes age and

ethnicity in the scope of annual pay equity reviews.

Remuneration at Vector is based on performance and

within this framework Vector makes adjustments when

appropriate to ensure equity across like-for-like roles.

This has become part of business as usual at Vector and

the company regularly monitors and adjusts salaries

across all three categories (gender, age, ethnicity) if any

gaps are identified. Vector reports its gender pay gap in

the remuneration report on page 42. Its overall diversity

and inclusion programme is focused on creating an

inclusive culture that attracts and retains talented people

from all parts of our communities. Vector has a continued

focus on performance and merit-based recruitment

and promotion.

33

Governance report

Gender statistics
Vector’s gender statistics are as follows:

AS AT 30 JUNE 2025AS AT 30 JUNE 2024

POSITIONFEMALEMALE

GENDER

DIVERSE

NOT

DISCLOSEDFEMALEMALE

GENDER

DIVERSE

Directors2 (28.6%)5 (71.4%)––2 (28.6%)5 (71.4%)–

Executive team1 (14.3%)6 (85.7%)––1 (14.3%)6 (85.7%)–

Direct reports to the executive team8 (20.0%)32 (80.0%)––9 (22.5%)31 (77.5%)–

Across the Vector group283 (35.4%)513 (64.1)–4 (0.50%)318 (32.6%)658 (67.4%)–

Investor engagement

Vector recognises the rights of shareholders as the owners

of the company and encourages their ongoing active

interest in the company’s affairs by:

–Communicating with them effectively

–Ensuring they have full access to information about

the company, including through the Vector website

–Conducting shareholder meetings in locations and

at times convenient to the majority of shareholders,

where possible

–Providing shareholders with adequate opportunity

to ask questions about, and comment upon, relevant

matters, and to question directly the external auditors

at shareholder meetings.

Vector’s board is committed to maintaining open and

transparent communications with investors and other

stakeholders and it supports a programme for two-way

engagement with shareholders, debt investors, the

media and the broader investment community. Annual

and interim reports, NZX releases, quarterly reports

on operational performance, governance policies and

charters and a wide variety of corporate information are

posted on Vector’s website. Vector conducts market

briefings in conjunction with the release of the annual

and interim financial results. Recordings of the briefings

are available on the annual reports page of the Investor

section of Vector’s website. Every shareholder is entitled

to receive a hard copy of each annual and interim report.

The company has a shareholder meetings page in

the Investors section of its website where documents

relating to meetings are available. Vector’s constitution

includes provisions relating to Entrust, Vector’s majority

shareholder. In addition, Vector and Entrust are parties to

a deed recording essential operating requirements, which

includes certain policy, consultation, pricing reporting and

the energy solutions programme obligations. A copy of

this deed is available on Entrust’s website.

The board is committed to reporting Vector’s financial and

non-financial information in an objective, balanced and

clear manner. The board takes an active role in overseeing

financial and non-financial reporting. The annual report

is an important document for communicating financial

reporting and also reports on strategic progress and

operational performance. It contains the financial

statements that are prepared to comply with generally

accepted accounting practice. The board contributes to

and reviews the annual report. Vector is committed to

transparent reporting of non-financial objectives, such as

environmental, social and governance factors.

The 2024 annual meeting was held as a hybrid meeting.

All shareholders had the opportunity to attend, participate

and vote either in person or online. Shareholders may raise

relevant matters for discussion at the annual shareholders’

meeting either in person or by emailing the company with

a question to be asked. Shareholders can also contact

the company to ask questions, or express views, about

matters affecting Vector. A dedicated email address

is available for shareholder/investor queries, which is:

investor@vector.co.nz. Contact details for Vector’s head

office are available on the website and at page 118 of this

annual report. Vector is committed to complying with

its obligations under the NZX Rules and the Companies

Act 1993, both of which contain specific requirements to

obtain shareholder approval for certain significant matters

affecting Vector. Where voting on a matter is required,

the board encourages investors to attend the meeting

or to send in a proxy vote. Notices of meeting are usually

available at least 20 working days prior to the meeting

on the shareholder meetings page in the Investors section

of Vector’s website. For the 2024 annual meeting, the

notice of meeting was made available and published on

the Vector website at least 20 working days before the

meeting.

Vector Annual Report 202534

Governance report

Continuous disclosure
The board is committed to:

–The provision of accurate, timely, orderly, consistent

and credible disclosure

–Compliance with the continuous disclosure

requirements of the Financial Markets Conduct Act

2013 and the NZX Rules.

The board supports the principle that high standards

of reporting and disclosure are essential for proper

accountability between the company and its investors,

employees and stakeholders. Vector achieves these

commitments, and the promotion of investor confidence,

by ensuring that trading in its securities takes place in

an efficient, competitive and informed market. Vector’s

continuous disclosure policy sets out protocols to facilitate

effective and compliant disclosure. Vector has also

established a management disclosure committee which

meets regularly to discuss continuous disclosure matters.

35

Governance report

Remuneration report
Dear Shareholders

As chair of Vector’s people and remuneration

committee, I am pleased to present our remuneration

report for the year ended 30 June 2025.

We continue to believe that Vector’s remuneration

framework supports the attraction, retention

and motivation of high-performing talent, while

aligning executive outcomes with company

strategy and shareholder and customer interests.

We have revised and introduced new internal

role bands with corresponding salary ranges.

All employees have visibility to their band level,

and we have continued to communicate our

banding methodology and embed these across

the company; otherwise, we have not made any

major changes over the past year.

A detailed overview of employee remuneration

is set out in the Remuneration approach section.

We have adopted NZX’s December 2023

remuneration reporting template recommendations

to further enhance the transparency and quality of

our remuneration disclosures. For 2025, we have

considered how we might continue to improve our

reporting and provided the additional information

in a number of areas:

–Details on the corporate short-term incentive

(STI) construct as part of the group chief

executive disclosure

–Details on the group chief executive’s

remuneration for FY2025

–Information on Vector’s gender pay gap and

gender pay equity.

Beyond remuneration, we introduced a

company-wide employee engagement survey in

October 2024. While we were pleased with the

overall results, we have used the commentary

and feedback to determine focus areas along

with comprehensive action plans, noting our

commitment to continuous improvement. We have

also focused on our talent pipeline, both internally

and externally. We have been building on our

strategic workforce planning to understand skills

and capabilities required in our critical operational

areas and align recruitment and development

programmes. In addition, we have focused on

critical roles and ensuring these positions have

comprehensive succession plans. Externally, we

are proactively building our talent pipeline and

developing strategic talent-based collaborations.

In the year ahead and beyond, Vector will consider

the extent to which we need to develop and build

upon our remuneration framework to meet new

work challenges, changing market and talent

environments, and diverging business needs.

We will continue our work to further simplify our

STI schemes – both in terms of the number of

constructs and number of key goals.

Dame Paula Rebstock

Chair, People and Remuneration Committee

22 August 2025

People and remuneration

committee chair letter

Vector Annual Report 202536

Remuneration report

Remuneration governance
The people and remuneration committee assists the

board in overseeing the performance and remuneration

of the group chief executive and executive team. It also

provides oversight of Vector’s broader people strategy,

culture and related policies.

The committee operates under a written charter, which is

available at vector.co.nz/investors/governance.

The majority of members are independent directors.

Other directors have a standing invitation to attend

committee meetings and management attends

committee meetings by invitation.

Attendance at committee meetings during the FY2025

period is shown on page 30.

NAMEDATE JOINED THE COMMITTEE

LENGTH OF MEMBERSHIP

TO 30 JUNE 2025DATE LEFT THE COMMITTEE

Paula Rebstock (chair)2 Dec 20195 years, 7 monthsN/A, current member

Alastair Bell2 Dec 20195 years, 7 monthsN/A, current member

Bruce Turner 1 Nov 20231 year, 8 monthsN/A, current member

Anne Urlwin* 1 Nov 20231 year24 Oct 2024

*

Anne Urlwin remains a director on the Vector board.

Key: Current committee member Committee member in the FY2025 period

External and independent advice

During the year, Vector engaged Pricewaterhouse

Coopers New Zealand (PwC NZ) to provide independent

advice on potential incentive scheme designs and their

implications. PwC also conducted market benchmarking

for directors, the group chief executive and executive

team remuneration. PwC did not provide any other

material services that would impact their independence

in relation to this advice.

Remuneration approach

Our remuneration framework is designed to attract

and retain high-performing individuals, support the

delivery of the company’s strategy and reward employees

appropriately. The framework is designed around four

guiding principles:

–Ensure Vector is competitively positioned in the New

Zealand employment market

–Reward high performance through pay, based on

results achieved and demonstrated behaviours and

competencies

–Reward achievement of strategic objectives and

increasing shareholder returns

–Ensure fairness and equity is applied across

remuneration decisions.

Our remuneration policy sets out our approach to

remuneration for all employees (including the group chief

executive and his direct reports). The remuneration policy

is available to view at vector.co.nz/investors/governance.

There were no material changes to Vector’s remuneration

strategy or policy in FY2025, except to combine our

employee and executive remuneration policies into one.

The group chief executive and executive team’s

remuneration consists of a base salary, standard

employee benefits and a short-term incentive (STI).

No long-term incentive (LTI) is currently offered.

Fixed remuneration

Fixed remuneration (not at risk) consists of base salary

and other benefits including KiwiSaver. Base salary is

reviewed each year in line with data from independent

remuneration specialists. Employees’ base salary is

based on a matrix of their own performance including

behaviours and their current position in their internal

remuneration band when compared to the market.

37

Remuneration report

Short-term incentives (STI)
Senior employees were invited to participate in the

FY2025 STI scheme. The FY2025 STI is an at-risk cash

incentive, calculated as a percentage of base salary

(target percentages ranging from 20% to 65%) depending

on the complexity and level of the role.

The purpose of the STI scheme is to reward behaviour

and outcomes that are considered important for Vector’s

shareholders and customers, and is measured against five

overarching goals: financial, customer, health and safety,

people, and climate change. Company performance goals

are set and reviewed annually by the board to align with

business and financial objectives. Targets and measures

may vary by business area; however, these are aligned

where appropriate.

In the FY2025 period, Vector had four distinct business

area STI constructs covering:

–Corporate

–Electricity and Gas

–HRV

–VTS.

The STI scheme is subject to financial (adjusted EBITDA)

and health and safety (no fatalities because of Vector’s

policies or processes) gates, as well as an individual

performance gate. All must be met before any payment

occurs. STI payments are determined following a review

of company performance and paid out at between 0%

and 113% for all eligible employees. As an example of how

the STI is calculated, an employee with a base salary of

$200,000 and an STI target of 20% may receive between

$0 and $45,200 (0% to 113% of their STI) depending, at

the board’s discretion, on the level of business unit and

company performance assuming the gates are met.

STI payments relating to the financial year ended 30 June

2025 are delivered as a taxable cash payment and are

payable on completion of the annual audited financial

statements. Payments relating to the 2025 financial year

are therefore paid in the 2026 financial year. The outcomes

of three of the four STI constructs are outlined below.

No payment calculations were undertaken for HRV, as

the financial gate was not achieved.

Corporate: FY2025 STI goals and results

GOALS

CORPORATE

METRIC% PAY-OUT

Financial Adjusted EBITDA (group)40.7%

CustomerCustomer satisfaction target32.5%

Health and safetyAggregate of three lag indicators (LTIFR*, TRIFR** and Severity Rate)7.5%

PeopleeNPS (shared services)0%

Climate changeDecarbonisation milestone targets10.5%

Total91.2%

* Lost Time Injury Frequency Rate

** Total Recordable Injury Frequency Rate

Electricity and Gas: FY2025 STI goals and results

GOALS

ELECTRICITY AND GAS

METRIC% PAY-OUT

Financial Adjusted EBITDA (business unit)40.9%

CustomerCustomer satisfaction target

Unplanned gas, SAIDI and SAIFI targets

32.5%

Health and safetyAggregate of three lag indicators (LTIFR*, TRIFR** and Severity Rate)7.5%

PeopleeNPS (business unit)0%

Climate changeDecarbonisation milestone targets10.5%

Total91.4%

* Lost Time Injury Frequency Rate

** Total Recordable Injury Frequency Rate

Vector Annual Report 202538

Remuneration report

VTS: FY2025 STI goals and results
GOALS

VTS

METRIC% PAY-OUT

Financial Key projects and cost management targets*

CustomerCustomer and service level agreement targets*

PeopleeNPS (business unit)*

Total*

The group chief executive and four executives are

measured on the corporate goals: the chief financial

officer, the chief legal and assurance officer, the chief

public policy and regulatory officer, and the chief

people and communications officer. The chief operating

officer (COO) of electricity, gas and fibre is measured in

accordance with the electricity and gas business area

goals and the COO of Vector Technology Solutions (VTS) in

accordance with the VTS business area goals. There is no

executive measured against the HRV business area goals.

Other remuneration

Vector has not provided a joining bonus to executives

in the last financial year. Vector does not provide

‘termination payments’ to outgoing executives, nor does it

provide retirement payments (if any at all) at greater rates

for executives than other staff members (if applicable).

* Pending board determination

39

Remuneration report

FIXED REMUNERATIONAT-RISK REMUNERATIONTOTAL REMUNERATION
EARNED IN RELATIONSALARY BENEFITS


SUBTOTALSTI

FY2025$1,609,137$0 $1,609,137$1,163,084$2,772,221

FY2024$1,554,722$0 $1,554,722$1,187,419$2,742,141

A description of the group chief executive’s at-risk remuneration for the performance period ending 30 June 2025

is set out below.

SCHEMEDESCRIPTIONPERFORMANCE MEASURES

PERCENTAGE OF

TARGET AWARDED

STICash STI is a

discretionary scheme

based on

achievement of KPIs

Corporate shared KPIs:

–40% adjusted EBITDA

–30% customer satisfaction

–10% health and safety lag indicators

–10% eNPS

–10% carbon reduction and resilience goals

59.28%

The group chief executive’s individual KPIs for the year

ending 30 June 2025 included key strategic initiatives

relating to Bluecurrent and succession planning.

13%

FY2026 group chief executive STI structure

The board has elected, in the interests of transparency, to disclose in advance the STI structure that applies for FY2026.

Given the current group chief executive is leaving at the end of December 2025, there are no individual KPIs for the year

ending 30 June 2026. In addition, the board retains its discretion to amend this STI structure in connection with the

appointment of a new group chief executive.

SCHEMEDESCRIPTIONPERFORMANCE MEASURES

STICash STI is a

discretionary scheme

based on

achievement of KPIs

Corporate shared KPIs:

–30% adjusted EBITDA

–40% customer satisfaction, SAIDI and SAIFI targets

–15% health and safety lag and lead indicators

–15% employee engagement targets

This year, we have met our 2030 emissions reduction target. As a result, no specific climate change measure has been

included in the FY2026 STI scheme. With the target achieved, our focus is now on maintaining these reductions while

advancing our broader Symphony objectives to support the energy transition. Management will also review Vector’s

climate resilience initiatives and broader climate-related activities to ensure continued alignment with evolving best

practices and stakeholder expectations.

specialists using relevant market peer benchmarks,

as is the case with the executive team and certain senior

leadership roles.

Group chief executive remuneration outcomes

The table below shows the amounts assessed as earned

in relation to a financial year but not paid in that same

financial year (as the assessment of the STI performance

is made after the balance date). For instance, the STI

earned for FY2024 was paid in FY2025 (September 2024).

The STI earned in relation to FY2025 is expected to be

paid in FY2026 (September 2025).

Group chief executive remuneration arrangements

Vector’s group chief executive is covered by

the remuneration policy that is available at

vector.co.nz/investors/governance.

The group chief executive’s total remuneration includes

fixed remuneration, and an annual at-risk STI. The STI is

based on the achievement of corporate key performance

indicators (KPIs) and individual performance objectives,

with a maximum opportunity of 78% of base salary. No

long-term incentive (LTI) plan was in place for the group

chief executive during FY2025.

The group chief executive’s base salary is reviewed

periodically by the board and by external remuneration

1. Benefits include KiwiSaver, life and income protection insurance, carpark provision, and home phone rental, tolls and internet expenses.

Vector Annual Report 202540

Remuneration report

REMUNERATION BANDGROUPCOMPANY
$100,001 - $110,000

6550

$110,001 - $120,0004535

$120,001 - $130,0004635

$130,001 - $140,0004233

$140,001 - $150,0004943

$150,001 - $160,0004134

$160,001 - $170,0003732

$170,001 - $180,0004841

$180,001 - $190,0002621

$190,001 - $200,0003226

$200,001 - $210,0001612

$210,001 - $220,0001010

$220,001 - $230,0001515

$230,001 - $240,00076

$240,001 - $250,0001514

$250,001 - $260,00055

$260,001 - $270,00011

$270,001 - $280,00032

$280,001 - $290,00033

$290,001 - $300,00044

$300,001 - $310,00011

$310,001 - $320,0001–

$320,001 - $330,00022

REMUNERATION BANDGROUPCOMPANY

$330,001 - $340,00011

$340,001 - $350,00044

$350,001 - $360,00044

$360,001 - $370,00044

$370,001 - $380,00011

$380,001 - $390,00011

$400,001 - $410,00011

$430,001 - $440,00011

$450,001 - $460,00022

$460,001 - $470,00011

$470,001 - $480,00022

$530,001 - $540,0001–

$570,001 - $580,0001–

$600,001 - $610,00011

$680,001 - $690,00011

$690,001 - $700,00011

$740,001 - $750,00011

$860,001 - $870,00011

$870,001 - $880,00011

$980,001 - $990,00011

$1,170,001 - $1,180,00011

$2,790,001 - $2,800,00011

547456

Group employees who earn over $100,000

The table below shows the number of employees and

former employees who received remuneration and other

benefits during FY2025 of at least $100,000 for the year

ended 30 June 2025. This includes 129 employees who are

no longer employed as a result of business divestments

and employee turnover.

The value of remuneration benefits analysed includes:

–Fixed remuneration including allowance/overtime

payments

–Employer KiwiSaver/superannuation contributions

–Short-term cash incentives relating to FY2024

–Relocation and other payments made at the start

of employment

–Redundancy and other payments made on

termination of employment.

The figures do not include amounts paid after 30 June

2025 that relate to the year ended 30 June 2025.

Table of employees who earn over $100,000

No employee of the group appointed as a director

of a subsidiary or associate company receives or

retains any remuneration or benefits as a director. The

remuneration and benefits of such employees, received

as employees, are included in the relevant bandings

disclosed above.

41

Remuneration report

Gender pay reporting
We are committed to fair and equitable pay practices,

and to building a workforce that reflects and includes

the diverse communities we serve across Aotearoa

New Zealand.

Understanding pay reporting

Pay reporting is broadly defined as:

Gender pay gap – identifies any difference in the

median (or average) hourly wages of men and women.

This is calculated using the following formula: (male

hourly rate – female hourly rate)/(male hourly rate)

Gender pay equity – equal pay for equal work – identifies

any difference in the median (or average) pay men and

women receive for the same or similar roles. This is

calculated using the following formula: (male PIR – female

PIR)/(male PIR), where PIR is base salary divided by the

midpoint of the relevant internal salary range.

Vector’s pay reporting

We recognise and respect that gender is not binary.

For this reporting, we have calculated our gender pay

equity and pay gap only as the difference between those

that identify as women and men.

As at May 2025, the median gender pay gap is 15.86%,

meaning woman earn $0.84 for every dollar earned

CAREER LEVEL

WORKFORCE DEMOGRAPHICGENDER PAY REPORTING

FEMALE POPULATIONMALE POPULATIONMEDIAN PAY GAPMEDIAN PAY EQUITY

Management/executive 24.80%75.20%7.60%-0.40%

Specialist33.71%66.29%3.56%2.38%

Support 68.04%31.96%5.10%-1.32%

by men. At Vector, the context behind our gender

pay gap figure is that more senior technical roles and

managerial roles are currently held by men, which is

common across the energy and utilities sectors. In

addition, higher salaries are sometimes commanded

for a specific skillset or talent shortages in some areas,

many of which are male-dominated. The increase in the

median pay gap since 2024 is primarily due to the sale

of Ongas, which had a predominately male workforce

in lower-paid roles.

Our median gender pay equity gap as at May 2025 is

1.04%. We assess all roles at Vector based on the skills

and competencies required for the role and then use

market data to apply an appropriate remuneration range

for each position. Roles are grouped into salary bands,

which cluster similar-sized roles together. The slight

increase in our median pay equity gap is also primarily

due to the sale of Ongas.

Each year, as part of our annual remuneration review,

we analyse all our data to ensure that we are maintaining

our commitment to gender pay equity, and make

adjustments if required. The table below details Vector’s

workforce demographic and gender pay gap and pay

equity as at May 2025.

Vector Annual Report 202542

Remuneration report

Directors’ remuneration
When determining the fees for non-executive directors,

the board considers the market, Vector’s remuneration

practices compared to similar companies, the

competitiveness of the prevailing levels of remuneration

and our ability to meet the primary remuneration

policy objective of attracting and retaining high-quality

directors, and any changes in directors’ workloads.

A copy of Vector’s director remuneration policy is available

at vector.co.nz/investors/governance.

Director remuneration is reviewed by the board from time

to time and normally biennially.

Fee structure

The total non-executive director remuneration pool

available to directors (in their capacity as such) in the

year ended 30 June 2025 was fixed at our 2022 annual

shareholders’ meeting at $1,087,020.

The current fees by role are summarised in the following

table. The board allocates the total annual fee pool on

a consistent basis among the directors via a base fee

plus specified fees for each of the committee chair and

member roles held (excluding the board chair). Directors

are entitled to be reimbursed for reasonable incidental

costs associated with carrying out their duties and

professional development costs may also be paid by

Vector on a case-by-case basis. Non-executive directors

do not participate in any incentive or performance-based

remuneration schemes.

The board reserves the discretion to reallocate the total

annual fee pool, by resolution of the board, should the

board need to reconstitute the number of committees or

number of members on each committee.

GOVERNANCE BODYCHAIR PER ANNUMMEMBER PER ANNUM

Board$214,000*$107,000

Audit committee$27,000$15,000

Risk and assurance committee$27,000$15,000

People and remuneration committee$20,000$10,000

Pool for additional attendances$17,020

* The board chair is not paid additional fees as chair or member of the audit committee, risk and assurance committee or people and remuneration committee.

Actual payments

Fees payable to Vector’s directors for the 2025 financial year were as follows:

DIRECTORSFEE ($)

Doug McKay$214,000.00

Alastair Bell$132,000.00

Vaughan Busby*$0

Bruce Hassell**


$34,250.00

Paul Hutchison$122,000.00

Paula Rebstock$137,000.00

Bruce Turner$144,000.00

Anne Urlwin***


$147,333.33

* Appointed on 13 June 2025; no fees have been paid in the 2025 financial year.

** Resigned on 26 September 2024.

*** Stepped down from the people and remuneration committee on 24 October 2024.

Fee structure from 1 July 2025

At the date of this annual report, a market review of director fees has been carried out by PwC NZ for the board and

an increase to the fee pool (last increased in 2022) will be sought at the forthcoming annual shareholders’ meeting

in September.

43

Remuneration report

Who
we are

Who we are

44

Vector Annual Report 2025

Who we are

Who we are
45

Who we are

Our board
Dr Paul Hutchison

MB, ChB, FRCOG, FACOG, Dip Com Health, Member of Institute of Directors

NON-INDEPENDENT NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR


Appointed on 8 December 2021

Dr Paul Hutchison was elected to the AECT (now Entrust) in 2015. He is a clinician at Local

Doctors (formerly East Tamaki Healthcare), a former member of the New Zealand Medical

Council as well as director of a number of companies and a member of the Institute of

Directors. Paul was the MP for Port Waikato, then Hūnua from 1999 to 2014. He chaired the

Health Select Committee from 2008 to 2014 and was awarded the NZ Medical Association’s

award for outstanding contribution to health services in 2014. Paul was appointed as

Honorary Consul Papua New Guinea in 2022. His other interests include science and

innovation, sport, music and fishing and he enjoys spending time with his family.

Alastair Bell

BCom, CA, CMInstD, PMP, JP

NON-INDEPENDENT NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR


Appointed on 23 September 2019

Alastair Bell is a chartered accountant, chartered director and qualified member of the

Project Management Institute. He has more than 30 years’ experience in the corporate,

public and not-for-profit sectors. Alastair balances his professional life between board

roles and leading a consultancy specialising in business and investment projects. He is an

elected Trustee of Entrust, chairing the Entrust board’s Regulation and Policy Committee.

Alastair chairs the Ōrākei Community Association. Formerly, he was deputy chair of

Foundation North and a trustee of the Motutapu Restoration Trust.

Vaughan Busby

MBA, BPharm

INDEPENDENT NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR


Appointed on 13 June 2025

Vaughan Busby is an experienced energy and infrastructure leader, bringing over 20

years of expertise to the board. He currently serves as a non-executive director for Energy

Queensland (the largest electricity distribution business in Australia) and Netlogix Australia

and is the chair of Australian entity SFV (an energy infrastructure financing company).

Previously, Vaughan was the chair of ASX-listed SciDev and has held directorships at

EnergyCo NSW, ASX-listed Energy One, Ergon Energy, Morrison and Infratil Energy

Australia.

Doug McKay

ONZM, BA, AMP (Harvard) CFInstD

INDEPENDENT NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR AND CHAIR


Appointed on 29 September 2022

Doug McKay has over 35 years’ commercial and operational experience and a deep

understanding of New Zealand and Australian markets having held managing director and

chief executive positions with Lion Nathan, Carter Holt Harvey, Goodman Fielder, Sealord,

Independent Liquor and Procter & Gamble. He was the inaugural chief executive of the

amalgamated Auckland Council from May 2010 to December 2013 and a former director of

Bank of New Zealand (chair), Trustee (chair) of the Eden Park Trust Board, Fletcher Building

Limited, Genesis Energy Limited, National Australia Bank Limited and Ryman Healthcare

Limited. In 2015, Doug was made an Officer of the New Zealand Order of Merit for services

to business and local government. He currently holds directorships with Delegat Group

and IAG New Zealand.

Vector Annual Report 202546

Our board

Bruce Turner
BE (Hons), ME, BCom

INDEPENDENT NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR


Appointed on 16 April 2019

Bruce Turner is a highly experienced senior executive with deep experience across the dairy

and energy sectors, both in New Zealand and internationally. Working in the energy industry

for more than 30 years, he was extensively involved in the development of the energy

industries in New Zealand, Singapore and Europe. Bruce was a member of the New Zealand

Electricity Market (NZEM) despatch rules working group, the NZEM Rules Committee, the

MARIA governance board and the Electricity Authority’s Security and Reliability Council. This

deep understanding of the sector is invaluable as Vector, and the energy industry, navigates

the challenges of climate change and increasing demand for clean electricity supply. As

well as the Vector board, his governance experience includes joint venture boards for both

Mercury and Fonterra. Bruce is a director of GlobalDairyTrade Holdings Limited and an

advisory board member at the University of Colorado’s JP Morgan Center for Commodities.

Anne Urlwin

BCom, FCA, CFInstD, MAICD, ACIS, FNZIM, ONZM

INDEPENDENT NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR


Appointed on 1 September 2021

Anne Urlwin is a professional director with experience in a diverse range of sectors

including construction, property development, health, infrastructure, telecommunications,

renewable energy, regulation and financial services. Her current governance roles

include chair of Precinct Properties New Zealand, and directorships of Infratil, Ventia

Services Group and City Rail Link. Anne is a former director of Summerset Group Holding,

Queenstown Airport Corporation, Tilt Renewables, Chorus, and Meridian Energy, and

a former chair of national commercial construction group Naylor Love Enterprises and

the New Zealand Blood Service. She is a chartered accountant with experience in senior

finance management roles. Anne was made an Officer of the New Zealand Order of Merit

in 2022 for services to business.

Dame Paula Rebstock

BSc (Econ), Dip & MSc (Econ)

INDEPENDENT NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR


Appointed on 16 April 2019

Dame Paula Rebstock is a leading Auckland-based economist and company director,

who was made a Dame Companion of the New Zealand Order of Merit in 2015. She is chair

of NZ Healthcare Investments (Awanui), National Hauora Coalition, and Deputy Chair of

AIA and the NZX, and a director of Bluecurrent Group, SeaLink Group and Auckland One

Rail, and she retired her directorship (chair) of Ngāti Whātua Ōrākei Whai Maia in July 2025.

Dame Paula is the former chair of the New Zealand Commerce Commission.

47

Our board

Our management team
Shailesh Manga

BTech, Optoelectronics (Hons)

CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER OF VECTOR TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS (VTS)


Shailesh Manga is responsible for leading the growth of the VTS business. Specifically,

he is charged with building relationships with key global partners to co-develop digital

platforms critical to a new energy future. Shailesh has a strong focus on local and global

customer opportunities to increase revenue and deliver key aspects of our business

strategy. His experience is unique and vast, having worked both locally and globally in

the fields of physics, telecommunications, user experience and innovation. In his last role,

Shailesh delivered innovative experiences for some of the world’s largest brands including

Google, Microsoft, Samsung, and LG.

Jason Hollingworth

MCom (Hons), FCA, CMInstD

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


Jason Hollingworth joined Vector as chief financial officer in May 2019. He has over 30 years’

experience in a range of senior corporate finance roles including being CFO of public

listed pay television company Sky TV, CFO of telecommunications company TelstraClear,

investment manager for the diversified investment company Ngāi Tahu Holdings,

executive director at Asian private power development company AsiaPower and a director

of corporate advisory firm Southpac Corporation. Jason has a Master of Commerce degree,

is a Fellow of the Institute of Chartered Accountants ANZ and a member of the Institute

of Directors.

Simon Mackenzie

Grad DipBS (Dist), DipFin, NZCE

GROUP CHIEF EXECUTIVE


Simon Mackenzie is passionate about the power of technology to transform the energy

industry and consumers’ lives. As group chief executive, he has expanded and driven

Vector’s portfolio of businesses to embrace innovative technologies and strategies to

deliver efficient, sustainable energy solutions to consumers. Simon was appointed Vector’s

group chief executive in 2008. His tertiary qualifications include engineering, finance and

business studies, and the Advanced Management Programme at the Wharton School,

University of Pennsylvania.

John Rodger

LLB, BA

CHIEF LEGAL AND ASSURANCE OFFICER AND COMPANY SECRETARY


John Rodger is Vector’s chief legal and assurance officer and company secretary.

He is responsible for Vector’s legal, corporate governance, health and safety, business

performance, internal audit, risk, compliance, privacy, government relations, and

property functions. John joined Vector in 2006 and has extensive experience of

Vector’s businesses and operations. He has worked across a range of sectors including

energy, telecommunications and financial services and previously held legal roles in

major corporates and professional services firms in London, the Cayman Islands and

New Zealand.

Vector Annual Report 202548

Our management team

Mark Toner
LLB (Hons), BCom

CHIEF PUBLIC POLICY AND REGULATORY OFFICER


With over 25 years’ experience across a range of sectors including energy,

telecommunications, aviation and technology, Mark Toner has consistently navigated

market, regulatory and policy changes across industries in disruption. Responsible for

leading the group’s regulatory, public policy, decarbonisation and data insights and

analytics functions, he combines strong stakeholder engagement and reputation

management expertise with his commercial and legal background to drive Vector’s

vision of creating a new energy future. Mark is a past recipient of the New Zealand Prime

Minister’s Business Scholarship and in 2018 completed an Advanced Management

Programme at MIT in Boston.

Peter Ryan

BE

CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER ELECTRICITY, GAS AND FIBRE


Peter Ryan leads the strategic and digital operations of Vector’s electricity, gas, and fibre

network businesses, with a clear focus on delivering exceptional outcomes for customers.

With two decades of international experience in the telecommunications and energy

sectors, he has successfully led engineering, field, and customer operations teams to

enhance service delivery and network reliability. Peter’s leadership has consistently

prioritised customer needs – ensuring the deployment, maintenance, and performance of

critical infrastructure aligns with evolving expectations.

Before joining Vector, he served as Chief Network Officer at NBNCo Australia, where he

played a pivotal role in the successful roll-out and operation of the national broadband

network, significantly improving broadband access for millions of Australians. He brings

deep expertise in operations management and performance transformation, along with

a proven ability to integrate technical, operational and commercial strategies to drive

customer-centric innovation and business success.

Sarah Williams

BA, Cert. Journalism

CHIEF PEOPLE AND COMMUNICATIONS OFFICER


Sarah Williams leads Vector Group’s people, marketing and communications business

units. Along with her teams, she is responsible for planning and delivering strategies

across these three disciplines. Sarah is a senior leader with 30 years’ experience, and has

had a range of leadership roles at an executive and board level spanning public relations

and human resources remits. She joined Vector from Porter Novelli, a public relations

and marketing agency, where she held the position of Managing Director. Her experience

encompasses crisis management, reputation and stakeholder engagement, workforce

planning, wellbeing and people development. In 2019, Sarah was inducted into the College

of Fellows of the Public Relations Institute of New Zealand in recognition of her significant

contribution to the industry and high levels of competence.

49

Our management team

Entrust, majority
shareholder of Vector

More than 300 undergrounding projects have been

completed since the programme began, in central,

east and south Auckland.

Energy consumer trust Entrust was formed over 30 years ago to ensure that

stewardship across Auckland’s electricity network remains in the hands of Aucklanders.

Entrust acts in the interests of its 368,000 (as at 2025 roll date) families and businesses

in central, east and south Auckland. Entrust protects the $2.8 billion investment in

Vector through its role in the appointment of directors to Vector’s board and requiring

regular audit of the state of the network.

Here for the community

Entrust is proud of the work it has undertaken for its

beneficiaries and all Aucklanders.

Passing on a share of Vector’s profits to

beneficiaries

Vector’s growth and operating performance enables

Entrust to distribute an annual dividend to beneficiaries

through its 75.1% stake in Vector.

Advocacy on behalf of energy consumers

Entrust regularly advocates on behalf of energy

consumers on important matters. Submissions are

available on Entrust’s website, entrustnz.co.nz.

Enabling projects with direct benefit

Entrust has an agreement with Vector that requires

an average of $12.5 million to be invested in projects in

the Entrust district of central, east and south Auckland

every year.

In the year to 30 June 2025, key undergrounding projects

have been undertaken in St Heliers, Beachlands, Newell

Street (Pt Chevalier) and Hauraki Road (Waiheke),

with further resident-initiated projects undertaken in

Lawrence Street (Herne Bay), Campbell Road (Maraetai)

and Melford Street (St Mary’s Bay).

In September 2024, each of Entrust’s 365,000

beneficiaries was eligible to receive a $350 dividend – that’s

more than $125 million going into the Auckland economy.

Entrust Trustees are (left to right):

Alastair Bell, Rachel Adams Langton, Denise Lee (Chair), Angus Ogilvie and Dr Paul Hutchison.

Vector Annual Report 202550

Entrust, majority shareholder of Vector

Other
disclosures

Other disclosures

51

Operating
statistics

YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE20252024

ELECTRICITY

Customers

1, 4

632,106624,330

New connections12,54815,959

Net movement in customers

2

7,77611,421

Volume distributed (GWh)8,6348,754

SAIDI (minutes)

3

Normal operations – unplanned76.698.4

Normal operations – planned49.255.8

Major network events16.314.1

Total142.1168.3

GAS DISTRIBUTION

Customers

1,4

120,621120,354

New connections1,2961,934

Net movement in customers2267723

Volume distributed (PJ)11.913.0

1 As at 30 June.

2. Net number of customers added during the period, includes disconnected, reconnected and decommissioned installation control points (ICPs).

3. SAIDI minutes for the regulatory year ended 31 March (audited).

4 Billable ICPs.

Vector Annual Report 202552

Operating statistics

Five-year financial
performance

YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE ($ MILLION)20252024202320222021

PROFIT OR LOSS

Total revenue – continuing operations

1

1,104.01,013.0963.9902.9844.6

Adjusted EBITDA – continuing operations

1

401.1345.3311.0316.8316.8

Depreciation and amortisation – continuing

operations

1

(231.4)(218.3)(193.7)(182.8)(168.2)

Adjusted EBIT – continuing operations

1

169.7127.0117.3134.0148.6

Net profit – continuing operations

1

154.775.6101.5137.3131.5

Total revenue – discontinued operations79.2228.6487.2436.1434.7

Adjusted EBITDA – discontinued operations12.936.5212.3193.2196.7

Depreciation and amortisation – discontinued

operations(1.6)(12.5)(64.4)(107.0)(101.9)

Adjusted EBIT – discontinued operations11.323.9147.986.294.8

Net profit – including discontinued

operations

2

167.791.01,715.8160.9194.6

BALANCE SHEET

Total equity3,600.93,776.73,958.02,430.12,335.4

Total assets6,922.37,125.67,527.66,812.26,519.5

Economic net debt

3

2,148.32,128.61,933.13,296.83,110.6

CASH FLOW

Operating cash flow515.2445.1517.1518.8499.1

Capital expenditure(474.9)(488.7)(639.0)(558.8)(516.2)

Dividends paid(268.7)(234.9)(169.9)(169.1)(165.8)

KEY FINANCIAL MEASURES

Adjusted EBITDA/total revenue

1

36.3%34.1%32.3%35.1%37.5%

Adjusted EBIT/total revenue

1

15.4%12.5%12.2%14.8%17.6%

Equity/total assets52.0%53.0%52.6%35.7%35.8%

Return on assets (adjusted EBITDA/assets)

1

5.8%4.8%4.1%4.6%4.9%

Gearing

4

37.3%36.2%33.1%58.2%56.8%

Net interest cover (adjusted EBIT/net interest

costs) (times)2.52.91.82.12.2

Earnings (NPAT) per share (cents)16.78.9171.515.919.3

Dividends declared, cents per share25.0024.0022.2516.7516.75

1. Excludes contribution from gas trading businesses (sold in year ended 30 June 2025) and the metering business (sold on 30 June 2023) for all periods presented.

2. One-off items included in total net profit: FY2025 includes a $37 million non-cash impairment, FY2024 includes a $60.6 million non-cash impairment.

FY2023 includes a $1,509.9 million gain on the 50% sale of the metering operations. FY2022 includes a $40.2 million non-cash impairment.

3. Economic net debt is borrowings and lease liabilities net of cash and cash equivalents and deposits.

4. Gearing is defined as economic net debt to economic net debt plus adjusted equity. Adjusted equity means total equity adjusted for hedge reserves.

53

Five-year financial performance

ADJUSTED EBITDA
$ MILLION


ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION


GAS DISTRIBUTION


OTHER


DISCONTINUED

OPERATIONS – GAS TRADING


DISCONTINUED

OPERATIONS – NATURAL GAS


DISCONTINUED

OPERATIONS – METERING


TOTAL GROUP


TOTAL CONTINUING

OPERATIONS

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021

513.5 509.9

523.3

381.8

414.0

316.8

316.8

311.0

345.3

401.1


ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION


GAS DISTRIBUTION


OTHER

1



DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS – GAS TRADING


DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS – NATURAL GAS


DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS – METERING


TOTAL GROUP


TOTAL CONTINUING OPERATIONS

REVENUE

$ MILLION

0

300

600

900

1200

1500

FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021

844.6

1,279.3

902.9

1,339.0

963.9

1,451.1

1,013.0

1,104.0

1,241.6

1,183.2

1. Includes eliminations of transactions between

segments, and with discontinued operations.

OPERATING CASH FLOWS

$ MILLION

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

550

FY25FY24FY23FY22FY21

499.1

518.8

517.1

445.1

515.2

4.0%

0.6%

4.0%

91.4%

F

Y

2

0

2

5

F

Y

2

0

2

4

2.1%

89.6%

4.4%

3.9%

CAPITAL EXPENDITURE


ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION


GAS DISTRIBUTION


OTHER


DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS – GAS TRADING

62.7%

37.3%

F

Y

2

0

2

5

F

Y

2

0

2

4

36.2%63.8%


ECONOMIC NET DEBT


ADJUSTED EQUITY

SOURCE OF FUNDING – GEARING

AS AT 30 JUNE

Vector Annual Report 202554

Other disclosures

Non-GAAP financial
information

Vector’s standard profit measure

prepared under New Zealand

Generally Accepted Accounting

Practice (GAAP) is net profit.

Vector has used non-GAAP profit

measures when discussing financial

performance in this document.

The directors and management

believe that these measures

provide useful information as they

are used internally to evaluate the

performance of business units, to

establish operational goals and

to allocate resources. For a more

comprehensive discussion on the use

of non-GAAP profit measures, please

refer to the policy ‘Reporting non-

GAAP profit measures’ available on

our website (vector.co.nz).

Non-GAAP profit measures are

not prepared in accordance with

New Zealand International Reporting

Standards (NZ IFRS) and are not

uniformly defined; therefore,

the non-GAAP profit measures

reported in this document may

not be comparable with those

that other companies report and

should not be viewed in isolation

from or considered as a substitute

for measures reported by Vector in

accordance with NZ IFRS.

Definitions:

EBITDA

Earnings before interest, taxation,

depreciation, amortisation,

impairment, associates and fair

value changes.

Adjusted EBITDA

EBITDA adjusted for customer

contributions, and significant one-

off gains, losses, revenues and/or

expenses.

20252024

YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE ($ MILLION)

Segment adjusted EBITDA

SEGMENT

EBITDA

LESS CAPITAL

CONTRIBUTIONS

SEGMENT

ADJUSTED

EBITDA

SEGMENT

EBITDA

LESS CAPITAL

CONTRIBUTIONS

AND OTHER

MOVEMENTS

SEGMENT

ADJUSTED

EBITDA

Electricity distribution547.8 (195.9)351.9 478.3 (183.2)295.1

Gas distribution60.0 (13.3)46.7 55.5 (10.7)44.8

Total reported segments607.8 (209.2)398.6 533.8 (193.9)339.9

Other3.8 (1.3)2.5 6.8 (1.4)5.4

Total – continuing operations611.6 (210.5)401.1 540.6 (195.3)345.3

Discontinued operations –

gas trading12.9 – 12.9 19.9 – 19.9

Discontinued operations –

natural gas– – – 16.6 – 16.6

Total discontinued operations12.9 – 12.9 36.5 – 36.5

Total group624.5 (210.5)414.0 577.1 (195.3)381.8

GAAP to Non-GAAP reconciliation

YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE ($ MILLION)

Group EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA20252024

Reported net profit for the period (GAAP) – continuing operations154.7 75.6

Add back: net interest costs72.4 52.1

Add back: tax (benefit)/expense86.5 97.7

Add back: depreciation and amortisation231.4 218.3

Add back: impairment37.0 60.0

Add back: associates (share of net (profit)/loss)21.1 24.9

Add back: fair value changes on financial instruments8.5 12.0

EBITDA611.6 540.6

Adjusted for:

Capital contributions(210.5)(195.3)

Adjusted EBITDA – continuing operations401.1 345.3

Adjusted EBITDA – discontinued operations12.9 36.5

Total group adjusted EBITDA414.0 381.8

55

Non-GAAP financial information

Financials
Vector Annual Report 202556

CONTENTS
Financial Statements

Profit or Loss 58

Other Comprehensive Income 59

Balance Sheet 60

Cash Flows 61

Changes in Equity 62

Notes to the Financial Statements 63

Independent Auditor’s Report 104

Financial Statements

2025 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

These financial statements for the year ended 30 June 2025 are dated 22 August

2025, and signed for and on behalf of Vector Limited by:

Chair 22 August 2025

Chair, audit committee 22 August 2025

And management of Vector Limited by:

Group Chief Executive 22 August 2025

Chief Financial Officer 22 August 2025

57

Financial statements

Profit or Loss
for the year ended 30 June

NOTE

2025

$M

2024

$M

Continuing operations

1

:

Revenue71,104.01,013.0

Operating expenses8(492.4)(472.4)

Depreciation and amortisation(231.4)(218.3)

Interest income925.651.7

Interest costs 10(98.0)(103.8)

Impairment of goodwill14(37.0)(60.0)

Fair value change on financial instruments24.2(8.5)(12.0)

Share of net profit/(loss) in joint ventures17.1(21.1)(24.9)

Profit/(loss) before income tax241.2173.3

Income tax benefit/(expense)18(86.5)(97.7)

Net profit/(loss) for the period from continuing operations154.775.6

Net profit/(loss) for the period from discontinued operations5, 613.015.4

Net profit/(loss) for the period 167.791.0

Net profit/(loss) for the period attributable to

Owners of the parent – continuing operations154.775.6

Owners of the parent – discontinued operations11.813.0

Non-controlling interests – discontinued operations1.22.4

Basic and diluted earnings per share (cents)

Continuing operations27.315.57.6

Discontinued operations27.31.21.3

Total16.78.9

1 The comparative information is restated due to discontinued operations. Refer to notes 5 and 6.

Vector Annual Report 202558

Financial statements

Other Comprehensive Income
for the year ended 30 June

NOTE

2025

$M

2024

$M

Net profit/(loss) for the period167.791.0

Other comprehensive income net of tax – continuing operations

Items that may be re-classified subsequently to profit or loss:

Net change in fair value of hedge reserves24.3(37.4)(29.5)

Translation of foreign operations(2.3)(1.5)

Items that will not be re-classified subsequently to profit or loss:

Share of other comprehensive income of joint ventures17.1(19.9)1.9

Fair value change on financial asset–(8.3)

Other comprehensive income for the period net of tax – continuing operations(59.6)(37.4)

Total comprehensive income for the period net of tax108.153.6

Total comprehensive income for the period attributable to

Owners of the parent – continuing operations95.138.2

Owners of the parent – discontinued operations11.813.0

Non-controlling interests – discontinued operations1.22.4

59

Financial statements

Balance Sheet
as at 30 June

NOTE

2025

$M

2024

$M

CURRENT ASSETS

Cash and cash equivalents1123.377.4

Short-term deposits11–27.2

Trade and other receivables13100.9100.0

Contract assets92.597.7

Derivatives242.53.2

Inventories11.526.4

Contingent consideration128.112.4

Intangible assets–7.6

Income tax1819.620.2

Disposal group held for sale6–9.7

Total current assets258.4381.8

NON-CURRENT ASSETS

Receivables134.41.0

Derivatives2463.883.2

Contingent consideration1220.029.9

Investment in joint venture17.1605.5684.2

Investment in private equity–0.5

Intangible assets141,051.91,132.1

Property, plant and equipment (PPE)154,807.94,667.2

Right of use assets (ROU)16.141.358.3

Income tax1869.085.3

Deferred tax190.12.1

Total non-current assets6,663.96,743.8

Total asset s6,922.37,125.6

CURRENT LIABILITIES

Trade and other payables20206.4223.1

Provisions210.92.3

Borrowings23–249.5

Derivatives240.30.5

Contract liabilities 52.673.9

Lease liabilities16.26.07.1

Income tax18–0.7

Total current liabilities266.2557.1

NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES

Provisions21–7.1

Borrowings232,049.11,789.0

Derivatives24143.6165.7

Contract liabilities2.96.8

Lease liabilities16.245.561.0

Deferred tax 19814.1762.2

Total non-current liabilities3,055.22,791.8

Total liabilities3,321.43,348.9

EQUITY

Equity attributable to owners of the parent3,600.93,761.5

Non-controlling interests in subsidiaries–15.2

Total equity3,600.93,776.7

Total equity and liabilities6,922.37,125.6

Net tangible assets per share (cents)27.3254.9262.2

Gearing ratio (%)27.337.336.2

Vector Annual Report 202560

Financial statements

Cash Flows
for the year ended 30 June

NOTE

2025

$M

2024

$M

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES

Receipts from customers973.11,053.1

Customer contributions received190.0179.3

Interest received 24.433.5

Payments to suppliers and employees(566.5)(704.6)

Interest paid(103.1)(111.4)

Income tax paid (2.7)(4.8)

Net cash flows from/(used in) operating activities26.1515.2445.1

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES

Proceeds from sale of PPE and software intangibles0.42.7

Purchase and construction of PPE (443.7)(464.7)

Purchase and development of software intangibles(31.2)(24.0)

Proceeds from contingent consideration1210.811.4

Proceeds from sale of discontinued operations5,6158.0–

Cash balance disposed in sale of discontinued operations6(5.6)–

Repayments of loans advanced36.295.6

Proceeds from sale of investment in associate–1.4

Other investing cash flows0.7(15.4)

Net cash flows from/(used in) investing activities(274.4)(393.0)

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES

Proceeds from borrowings3260.015.0

Repayments of borrowings3(305.0)(255.0)

Dividends paid 3(268.7)(234.9)

Lease liabilities payments(8.4)(9.6)

Net cash flows from/(used in) financing activities(322.1)(484.5)

Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents(81.3)(432.4)

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period104.6537.0

Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period23.3104.6

Cash and cash equivalents comprise:

Bank balances and on-call deposits23.377.4

Short-term deposits –27.2

23.3104.6

Discontinued operations

The cash flows above reflect the entire Vector group cash flows for the year ended 30 June 2025. Refer to note 6 for separately

disclosed cash flows from discontinued operations. Comparative information also includes cash flows from discontinued

operations from Vector’s natural gas and gas trading businesses, refer to notes 5 and 6 for more information.

61

Financial statements

Changes in Equity
for the year ended 30 June

NOTE

ISSUED

SHARE

CAPITAL

W$M

TREASURY

SHARES

$M

HEDGE

RESERVES

$M

OTHER

RESERVES

$M

RETAINED

EARNINGS

$M

NON-

CONTROLLING

INTERESTS

$M

TOTAL

EQUITY

$M

Balance at 30 June 2023880.0(0.1)55.7(5.0)3,012.215.23,958.0

Net profit/(loss) for the period––––88.62.491.0

Other comprehensive income––(29.5)(7.9)––(37.4)

Total comprehensive income––(29.5)(7.9)88.62.453.6

Dividends ––––(232.5)(2.4)(234.9)

Total transactions with owners––––(232.5)(2.4)(234.9)

Balance at 30 June 2024880.0(0.1)26.2(12.9)2,868.315.23,776.7

Net profit/(loss) for the period–––– 166.51.2167.7

Other comprehensive income––(37.4)(8.8)(13.4)–(59.6)

Total comprehensive income––(37.4)(8.8)153.11.2108.1

Dividends 3–––– (267.5)(1.2)(268.7)

Sale of discontinued

operations6–––––(15.2)(15.2)

Total transactions with owners–––– (267.5)(16.4)(283.9)

Balance at 30 June 2025880.0(0.1)(11.2)(21.7)2,753.9– 3,600.9

Vector Annual Report 202562

Financial statements

Notes to the Financial Statements
Note 1Company information64

Note 2Summary of material accounting policies64

Note 3Material transactions and events65

Note 4Segment information66

Note 5Discontinued operations – natural gas69

Note 6Discontinued operations – gas trading70

Note 7Revenue72

Note 8Operating expenses73

Note 9Interest income74

Note 10Interest costs74

Note 11Cash and cash equivalents and short-term deposits74

Note 12Contingent consideration75

Note 13Trade and other receivables75

Note 14Intangible assets77

Note 15Property, plant and equipment (PPE)79

Note 16Leases80

Note 17Investments82

Note 18Income tax expense/(benefit)84

Note 19Deferred tax85

Note 20Trade and other payables85

Note 21Provisions86

Note 22Fair values87

Note 23Borrowings89

Note 24Derivatives and hedge accounting91

Note 25Financial risk management 97

Note 26Cash flows100

Note 27Equity101

Note 28Related party transactions103

Note 29Contingent liabilities 103

Note 30Events after balance date103

63

Notes to the financial statements

1. Company information
Reporting entityVector Limited is a company incorporated and domiciled in New Zealand, registered under

the Companies Act 1993 and listed on the NZX Main Board (NZSX). The company is an FMC

reporting entity for the purposes of Part 7 of the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013. The

financial statements comply with this Act.

The financial statements presented are for Vector Limited Group (“Vector” or “the group”) as

at, and for the year ended 30 June 2025. The group comprises Vector Limited (“the parent”)

and its subsidiaries (together referred to as “the group”).

In accordance with the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013, where a reporting entity prepares

consolidated financial statements, parent company disclosures are not required.

Vector Limited is a 75.1% owned subsidiary of Entrust which is the ultimate parent entity for

the group.

The primary operations of the group are electricity and gas distribution, telecommunications

and new energy solutions.

2. Summary of material

accounting policies

Statement of complianceThe financial statements comply with New Zealand equivalents to International Financial

Reporting Standards (NZ IFRS), and other applicable Financial Reporting Standards, as

appropriate for Tier 1 for-profit entities. They also comply with International Financial

Reporting Standards.

Basis of preparationThe financial statements have been prepared in accordance with New Zealand Generally

Accepted Accounting Practice (NZ GAAP) as appropriate to Tier 1 for-profit entities.

They are prepared on the historical cost basis except for the following items, which are

measured at fair value:

—the identifiable assets and liabilities acquired in a business combination;

—certain financial instruments; and

—contingent consideration receivable as disclosed in the notes to the financial statements

The presentation currency is New Zealand dollars ($). All financial information has been

rounded to the nearest 100,000, unless otherwise stated.

The statements of profit or loss, other comprehensive income, cash flows and changes in

equity are stated exclusive of GST. All items in the balance sheet are stated exclusive of GST

except for trade receivables and trade payables, which include GST.

Material accounting estimates

and judgements

Vector’s management is required to make judgements, estimates, and apply assumptions that

affect the amounts reported in the financial statements. They have based these on historical

experience and other factors they believe to be reasonable. The table below lists the key areas

of judgements and estimates in preparing these financial statements:

Key areasJudgements / EstimatesNote

Valuation of contingent consideration receivableEstimates12, 22

Intangible assets: valuation of goodwill, risk of impairmentEstimates14

Property, plant and equipment: classification of costsJudgements15

Leases: assessment of lease term for perpetual leases and

leases with renewal optionsJudgements16

Valuation of derivative financial instrumentsEstimates22, 24

New standards and

interpretations adopted

A number of new standards and interpretations are effective from 1 July 2024, but they do not

have a material effect on the group’s financial statements. The financial statements for the

year ended 30 June 2025 have applied the amendment to FRS-44 Disclosure of Fees for Audit

Firms’ Services, which specifies disclosures relating to fees paid to the auditors. Refer to note 8

for further details.

A number of new standards and interpretations are effective for annual periods beginning

on or after 1 July 2025 and earlier application is permitted, however the group has not early

adopted the new or amended standards in preparing these consolidated financial statements.

Vector has considered the impact of standards and interpretations not yet effective and do not

expect any of these to have a material impact.

Vector Annual Report 202564

Notes to the financial statements

3. Material transactions
and events

Material transactions and events that have impacted the financial year ended 30 June 2025:

Sale of discontinued

operations

On 1 July 2024, Vector completed the sale of the remaining contracts in the natural gas

business to Nova Energy Limited. Refer to note 5 for further details.

On 31 January 2025, Vector completed the sale of LPG business Vector Ongas, and the

group’s shareholding in Liquigas Limited, to Elgas Limited for $150.0 million. Vector Ongas

and Liquigas were previously included in the gas trading segment. Refer to note 6 for further

details.

Commerce commission

decisions

The Commission is currently consulting on the price reset for its fourth Default Price-quality

Path (“DPP4”), which relates to the period beginning 1 October 2026 for gas distribution

businesses. They have released an open letter in February 2025, and an issues paper for

submissions was released in June 2025. Vector provided submissions to the issues paper on 24

July 2025. The draft decision is expected in November 2025, with the final decision in May 2026.

This decision will impact the future cash flows we can expect to earn from the gas distribution

business.

Regulatory quality thresholdsFor both the regulatory years to 31 March 2024 and 31 March 2025, Vector was not in breach of

its unplanned SAIDI and SAIFI quality limits.

Regulatory consultationsIn October 2024, the Electricity Authority opened two consultations.

The first of these is the Distribution connection pricing proposed code amendment

consultation, which purports to improve connection pricing methodologies, so they are more

efficient and have greater consistency across distributors.

The second consultation, the ‘Network connection project – stage one’ seeks to improve

the efficiency of connecting to the electricity distribution network and upgrading existing

connections.

The decisions of both consultations were released on 18 July 2025. These determinations

will influence how Vector manages its customer connections. The Electricity Authority has

indicated it will continue to engage with distributors regarding the level of contributions that

can be charged for customer connections, while deferring a final decision on this issue for

further consideration.

Debt programmeIn May 2025, Vector repaid $250.0 million of senior bonds.

During the year ended 30 June 2025, the group drew down $260.0 million and repaid

$55.0 million of bank facilities for a net drawdown of $205.0 million from the bank facilities

(year ended 30 June 2024: net nil movement). Refer to note 23 for more details on borrowings.

Impairment of goodwillDuring the year ended 30 June 2025, the group recognised an impairment loss of $37.0 million

in respect of goodwill allocated to the gas distribution CGU (year ended 30 June 2024:

$60.0 million).

The uncertainty of future price-quality path regulation for gas distribution poses a risk for

further impairment. The DPP4, expected in May 2026 (see Commerce commission decisions)

impacts the future cash flows we can expect to earn from the regulated gas distribution

business, and will be reflected in the impairment testing of the gas distribution CGU.

DividendsIn February 2025, the board approved an updated dividend policy, targeting distribution

of 70-100% of free cash flow in each financial year. The intent is to align the policy with the

Commission’s five-yearly regulatory cycle, as this is a large part of what determines Vector’s

revenue and earnings in each five year period.

Vector Limited’s final dividend for the year ended 30 June 2024 of 14.75 cents per share was

paid on 16 September 2024, comprising an ordinary unimputed dividend of 13.00 cents per

share and a special unimputed dividend of 1.75 cents per share. The total dividend paid was

$147.5 million.

Vector Limited’s interim dividend for the year ended 30 June 2025 of 12.00 cents per share

(unimputed) was paid on 31 March 2025. The total dividend paid was $120.0 million.

Liquigas Limited, a subsidiary of the group until the sale of the gas trading business on

31 January 2025, paid dividends of $1.2 million to the company’s non-controlling interests

during the year ended 30 June 2025.

65

Notes to the financial statements

4. Segment information
SegmentsVector report on two reportable segments in accordance with NZ IFRS 8 Operating Segments.

These segments are reported internally to the group chief executive. This reporting is used to

assess performance and make decisions about the allocation of resources.

The segments are:

Electricity distributionAuckland electricity distribution services.

Gas distributionAuckland gas distribution services.

Since Vector’s Annual Report for the year ended 30 June 2024, the gas trading businesses

within the gas trading segment have been reclassified as discontinued operations held for

sale, and the gas trading segment is no longer a reportable segment.

Following the reclassification of the gas trading segment, Vector’s reportable segments

were assessed in accordance with NZ IFRS 8 Operating Segments. This has resulted in the

electricity and gas distribution segments being recognised as separate reporting segments

for the year ended 30 June 2025. These were previously combined into the regulated networks

reportable segment.

Other includes telecommunications, digital services, energy solution services and corporate

operations. The reportable segments have also been updated to include a portion of shared

corporate costs, in line with allocations used for the most recent regulatory reporting period.

On 31 January 2025, the gas trading business was sold. Further details of the sale of the gas

trading business can be found in note 6.

Comparative information has been updated to reflect these changes. There have been no

other changes to the reportable segments and policies.

Segment profitThe measures of segment profit reported are earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) and

earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, amortisation and impairments (EBITDA). Both are

non-GAAP measures that do not have a standardised meaning under NZ IFRS.

Activities not reported in

segments

Other activities engaged by the group comprise shared services and other business activities,

and discontinued operations. Revenues generated by these activities are incidental to Vector’s

operations and/or do not meet the definition of an operating segment under NZ IFRS 8. The

results for these activities are reported in the reconciliations of segment information to the

group’s financial statements, and the discontinued operations note.

Interest income, interest costs, fair value change on financial instruments and share of net

profit/(loss) in joint venture are not allocated to the segments.

Geographical informationThe group derives the majority of its revenue from external customers in New Zealand.

Major customersVector engages with four major customers, each of which contribute greater than ten percent

of the group’s revenue. These customers are large energy retailers. For the year ended

30 June 2025, the customers contributed $222.8 million (2024: $209.7 million), $131.6 million

(2024: $118.3 million), $131.5 million (2024: $115.0 million) and $123.4 million (2024: $117.0 million)

respectively, which is reported across all segments.

Vector Annual Report 202566

Notes to the financial statements

4. Segment information continued
30 JUN 2025

12 MONTHS

ELECTRICITY

DISTRIBUTION

$M

GAS

DISTRIBUTION

$M

OTHER

$M

INTER-

SEGMENT

ELIMINATIONS

$M

TOTAL

$M

External revenue:

Sales762.267.264.1–893.5

Customer contributions195.913.31.3–210.5

Inter-segment revenue2.0–16.7(18.7)–

Segment revenue960.180.582.1(18.7)1,104.0

External expenses:

Electricity transmission expenses(200.7)–––(200.7)

Network and asset maintenance(76.5)(8.3)(2.8)–(87.6)

Employee benefit expenses(45.9)(4.5)(29.4)–(79.8)

Other expenses(76.4)(7.6)(40.3)–(124.3)

Inter-segment expenses(12.8)(0.1)(5.8)18.7–

Segment operating expenses(412.3)(20.5)(78.3)18.7(492.4)

Segment EBITDA547.860.03.8–611.6

Depreciation and amortisation(181.1)(29.2)(21.1)–(231.4)

Impairment–(37.0)––(37.0)

Segment EBIT366.7(6.2)(17.3)–343.2

Segment capital expenditure432.019.019.1–470.1

Reconciliation of segment reporting to profit or loss:

30 JUN 2025

12 MONTHS

$M

Segment EBIT reported in the segment information343.2

Interest income25.6

Interest costs(98.0)

Fair value change on financial instruments(8.5)

Share of net profit/(loss) in joint venture(21.1)

Profit before tax from continuing operations241.2

67

Notes to the financial statements

4. Segment information continued
30 JUN 2024 (restated)

12 MONTHS

ELECTRICITY

DISTRIBUTION

$M

GAS

DISTRIBUTION

$M

OTHER

$M

INTER-

SEGMENT

ELIMINATIONS

$M

TOTAL

$M

External revenue:

Sales687.465.165.2–817.7

Customer contributions183.210.71.4–195.3

Inter-segment revenue2.0–15.6(17.6)–

Segment revenue872.675.882.2(17.6)1,013.0

External expenses:

Electricity transmission expenses(188.9)–––(188.9)

Network and asset maintenance(74.5)(8.2)(3.2)–(85.9)

Employee benefit expenses(45.4)(4.7)(31.3)–(81.4)

Other expenses(72.6)(7.1)(36.5)–(116.2)

Inter-segment expenses(12.9)(0.3)(4.4)17.6–

Segment operating expenses(394.3)(20.3)(75.4)17.6(472.4)

Segment EBITDA478.355.56.8–540.6

Depreciation and amortisation(171.3)(25.1)(21.9)–(218.3)

Impairment –(60.0)––(60.0)

Segment EBIT307.0(29.6)(15.1)–262.3

Segment capital expenditure457.022.220.0–499.2

Reconciliation of segment reporting to profit or loss:

30 JUN 2024

12 MONTHS

$M

Segment EBIT reported in the segment information262.3

Interest income51.7

Interest costs(103.8)

Fair value change on financial instruments(12.0)

Share of net profit/(loss) in joint venture(24.9)

Profit before tax from continuing operations173.3

Vector Annual Report 202568

Notes to the financial statements

5. Discontinued operations – natural gas
On 1 July 2024, Vector completed the sale of the remaining contracts in the natural gas business to Nova Energy Limited

for consideration of $9.7 million, which was equal to the carrying amount of the business. No gain or loss on disposal was

recognised. At 30 June 2025, Vector had received $8.0 million of the consideration, with the last instalment due on 31 July 2025.

The disposal group was presented as discontinued operations in the interim financial statements for the six months ended

31 December 2023 as well as in the 2024 Annual Report. Comparatives show the discontinued operations separately from the

continuing operations.

Carrying value of net assets sold as at 1 July 2024$M

Intangible assets 9.7

Net assets sold9.7

Net cash consideration9.7

Gain/(loss) on sale of discontinued operations – natural gas–

PoliciesVector classifies a disposal group as held for sale if its carrying amount will be recovered

principally through a sale transaction rather than through continuing use. The disposal

group is measured at the lower of carrying amount and fair value less costs to sell.

The two criteria that must be met to classify a disposal group as held for sale are:

—The disposal group is available for immediate sale in its present condition; and

—The sale transaction is highly probable.

A disposal group that is sold or held for sale is also reported as discontinued operations if it

meets the below criteria:

—It is a component of the groups’ business, the operations and cash flows of which can be

clearly distinguished from the rest of the group; and

—It represents a separate major line of business or geographical area of operations.

Impairment on reclassification

to held for sale

The goodwill allocated to the natural gas business had been reclassified as held for sale at

30 June 2024, resulting in an impairment of $0.6 million.

69

Notes to the financial statements

6. Discontinued operations – gas trading
On 25 July 2024, Vector signed a conditional agreement for the sale of the Ongas LPG business, and shares in Liquigas Limited

(“the gas trading business”). The sale was completed on 31 January 2025.

The gas trading business was previously included in the group’s gas trading segment. For the year ended 30 June 2025, the

financial results of the disposal group are reported as discontinued operations in the profit or loss statement. Additionally, prior

year figures have been restated to clearly separate discontinued operations from continuing ones.

Profit and loss of discontinued operations – gas trading

2025

7 MONTHS

$M

2024

12 MONTHS

$M

Revenue79.2128.3

Operating expenses(66.3)(108.4)

Depreciation and amortisation(1.6)(12.5)

Interest income0.20.3

Interest cost(0.7)(0.9)

Profit/(loss) before income tax10.86.8

Income tax benefit/(expense)(1.7)(2.5)

Net profit/(loss) for the period before gain on sale9.14.3

Gain on sale (net of tax)3.9–

Net profit/(loss) for the period – discontinued operations – gas trading13.04.3

2025

7 MONTHS

$M

2024

12 MONTHS

$M

Capital expenditure of discontinued operations – gas trading2.910.9

Cash flows from discontinued operations – gas trading

2025

7 MONTHS

$M

2024

12 MONTHS

$M

Net cash flows from/(used) in operating activities14.325.7

Net cash flows from/(used in) investing activities(3.6)(8.4)

Net cash flows from/(used in) financing activities (3.4) (7.1)

Net cash inflow/(outflow)7.310.2

Revenue – gas trading sales

Sale of LPG – comprises bulk

LPG sales to commercial

customers and bottled LPG

sales to both commercial

and residential customers.

Revenue is recognised at a point in time when LPG is delivered to a customer’s site.

Billing to a customer occurs after completion of deliveries and at the end of each month

with payment terms ranging from 60 days to 90 days.

Distribution of LPG – The

group provides services in

the areas of bulk LPG storage,

distribution and management.

Revenue is recognised over time in line with a customer’s consumption of monthly tolling

and storage volumes and measured at the transaction price of the contract. The transaction

price for a monthly tolling and storage contract includes variable consideration in the

form of volume pricing and take or pay arrangements. The group estimates the amount of

variable consideration present in each contract using the expected value method.

Vector Annual Report 202570

Notes to the financial statements

6. Discontinued operations – gas trading continued
Carrying value of net assets sold as at 31 January 2025$M

Cash and cash equivalents5.6

Trade and other receivables16.9

Inventories6.5

Intangible assets (including goodwill)40.9

Property, plant, and equipment105.7

Right of use assets (ROU)11.2

Deferred tax0.6

Trade and other payables(5.0)

Provisions(7.8)

Lease liabilities(11.7)

Income tax(0.6)

Non-controlling interests in Liquigas (15.2)

Net assets sold147.1

Net cash consideration received on completion150.0

Working capital wash-up2.4

Total consideration152.4

Costs of sale(1.4)

Carrying value of net assets sold(147.1)

Gain on sale of discontinued operations – gas trading3.9

Gain on saleVector has elected to follow NZ IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial Statements in recognising

the gain on sale from the transaction.

Under NZ IFRS 10, upon the loss of control of a subsidiary, any retained interest should

be remeasured to its fair value, with any resulting gain or loss recognised in the income

statement.

ConsiderationUpon completion of the sale, the group recognised a total of $152.4 million in consideration,

representing a combination of $150.0 million in cash consideration and $2.4 million for the

final working capital wash-up.

Depreciation and

amortisation

The gas trading business was classified as held for sale in July 2024, and its assets and

liabilities were presented as a disposal group held for sale in the FY25 interim financial

statements. Depreciation and amortisation on the assets of the gas trading business ceased

from July 2024 due to the held for sale classification.

71

Notes to the financial statements

7. Revenue
7.1 Revenue from contracts with customers

2025

$M

2024

$M

Regulated networks – sale of distribution services829.4752.5

Regulated networks - third party contributions209.2193.9

Other65.466.6

Total 1,104.01,013.0

Revenue streamsSatisfaction of performance obligation

Regulated networks – sale of

distribution services

The group receives revenue from

business customers and energy

retailers who sell energy to end

customers for electricity and gas

distribution services in Auckland.


Revenue from electricity and gas distribution services is measured at the value of

consideration received, or receivable, to the extent that pricing is determined by the

regulator within a defined revenue path.

Revenue is recognised over time on a basis that corresponds with end consumers’

pattern of electricity and gas consumption. Customers are billed monthly in arrears for

distribution services, including both a fixed portion, and variable pricing measured in

units of electricity and gas distributed. Revenue from distribution services therefore

includes an accrual for services provided but not billed at the end of the month.

The accrual is determined based on the group’s estimate of volume distributed in the

month using the most recent data available. A large portion of the contract assets at

balance date consists of this accrual.

Regulated networks – third party

contributions

The group receives contributions

from residential and commercial

customers towards the construction

of distribution system assets in

the Auckland electricity or gas

distribution networks.


Third party contributions are recognised as revenue over time, reflecting the

percentage completion of the underlying construction activity. The group recognises

a contract liability to account for consideration received from the customer but where

the agreed construction activity is not completed; and conversely a contract asset is

recognised to account for activities completed not billed.

The transaction price for third party contributions is netted against estimated rebates

payable to commercial customers. A contract liability is recognised to account for

payments received from customers for construction activities completed which are

eligible for rebates in the future based on completion of developments.

In the event that a contract combines a contribution towards an agreed construction

activity with sale of electricity or gas distribution services, the group unbundles the

contract into two performance obligations and recognises revenue in accordance

with each obligation’s accounting policy.

Other revenue streamsOther revenue includes telecommunications revenue and revenue from providing

energy solution services.

Telecommunications revenue from commercial customers comprise the sale of

fibre services. Revenue is recognised at the point in time of supply and customer

consumption.

Energy solutions services comprise predominantly the sale of home and commercial

ventilation and solar services. Revenue is recognised over time, reflecting the

percentage completion of each ventilation and solar system install.

Vector Annual Report 202572

Notes to the financial statements

7. Revenue continued
7.2 Revenue in relation to contract liabilities

The following table sets out the expected timing of future recognition of revenue relating to performance obligations not

satisfied (or partially satisfied) at balance date:

2025

1 - 2 YEARS

$M

3 - 4 YEARS

$M

TOTAL

$M

Electricity distribution services0.4–0.4

Telecommunication services0.20.81.0

Total0.60.81.4

2024

1 - 2 YEARS

$M

3 - 4 YEARS

$M

TOTAL

$M

Electricity distribution services2.0–2.0

Telecommunication services1.7–1.7

Total3.7–3.7

PoliciesNo information is provided in relation to the remaining performance obligations at 30 June

2025 or 30 June 2024 that have an original duration of one year or less as permitted by NZ IFRS

15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers.

Revenue recognisedOf the revenue recognised this year, $61.2 million was included in the contract liability balance

at the beginning of the reporting period. (2024: $54.6 million).

8. Operating expenses

NOTE

2025

$M

2024

$M

Electricity transmission 4200.7188.9

Energy solutions cost of sales18.315.1

Network and asset maintenance487.685.9

Other direct expenses48.643.7

Employee benefit expenses479.881.4

Administration expenses13.212.3

Professional fees7.68.3

IT expenses32.031.7

Other indirect expenses 4.65.1

Total 492.4472.4

Fees paid to auditors

Fees were paid to KPMG as follows:

2025

$

2025

$

2024

$

2024

$

Audit or review of financial statements671,200624,500

Audit related services: Regulatory assurance378,000380,000

Regulatory agreed upon procedures121,30021,000

ESG assurance176,50080,500

Other assurance25,70024,200

Other agreed upon procedures10,30015,300

Total audit related services711,800521,000

Tax services: R&D tax credits74,000186,700

Other services: Risk management60,000–

Climate related pre-assurance–97,500

Total 1,517,0001,429,700

73

Notes to the financial statements

8. Operating expenses continued
Fees paid to auditors

continued

The audit fee includes fees for both the annual audit of the financial statements and the review

of the interim financial statements. Regulatory assurance consists of the audit of regulatory

disclosures. Regulatory agreed upon procedures includes compliance and one-off regulatory

assurance reviews. ESG assurance includes climate related disclosures and greenhouse gas

calculations. Other assurance includes the audit of guaranteeing group financial statements

and bond registers. Other agreed upon procedures includes trustee reporting and annual

general meeting vote scrutineering.

9. Interest income

NOTE

2025

$M

2024

$M

Interest income21.245.7

Unwinding of discount of contingent consideration124.46.0

Total 25.651.7

PoliciesInterest income includes income from funds invested and shareholder loans, recognised using

the effective interest rate method.

10. Interest costs`

NOTE

2025

$M

2024

$M

Interest expense95.9101.0

Amortisation of finance costs4.45.1

Capitalised interest(5.6)(5.6)

Interest on leases16.33.33.3

Total 98.0103.8

PoliciesInterest costs include interest expense on borrowings, recognised using the effective interest

rate method.

Capitalised interestVector has capitalised interest to PPE and software intangibles while under construction at an

average rate of 4.4% per annum (2024: 4.2%).

11. Cash and cash equivalents

and short-term deposits

2025

$M

2024

$M

Cash and cash equivalents 23.377.4

Short-term deposits–27.2

PoliciesCash and cash equivalents and short-term deposits are carried at amortised cost.

Cash and cash equivalents includes deposits that are on call, short-term deposits includes

deposits with a maturity date.

Vector Annual Report 202574

Notes to the financial statements

12. Contingent
consideration

NOTE

2025

$M

2024

$M

Carrying value of contingent consideration

Opening balance 42.360.9

Unwinding of discount94.46.0

Payments received26.1(10.8)(11.4)

Fair value movement24.2(7.8)(13.2)

Closing balance at 30 June28.142.3

Comprising:

Current8.112.4

Non-current20.029.9

Key accounting estimateThe fair value of the contingent consideration was estimated by calculating the present value

of the future expected cash flows payable by Todd Petroleum Mining Company Limited to

Vector. The future period of payment is not fixed by the contract but is dependent on the

remaining useful life of the Kapuni gas treatment plant (KGTP), which is directly correlated to

the volume of gas available at the Kapuni gas field and the rate at which the gas is extracted.

The values of future cash flows are highly dependent on the future sale prices of gas products

(LPG and oil) in the market. Underpinning this all is the assumption that there is an active

market for processed gas products in the future and government policy relating to the

transition of New Zealand to a low carbon economy.

Management have re-estimated the same unobservable inputs when calculating the fair value

of the contingent consideration at balance date. Refer to note 22 for details and sensitivity

analysis around material unobservable inputs used in measuring fair values.

13. Trade and other

receivables

2025

$M

2024

$M

Current

Trade receivables 75.469.7

Interest receivable11.718.0

Prepayments8.710.0

Other taxes and duties receivable–1.3

Other receivables5.11.0

Balance at 30 June100.9100.0

Non-current

Other contract receivables0.91.0

Other receivables3.5–

Balance at 30 June 4.41.0

75

Notes to the financial statements

13. Trade and other
receivables continued

At 30 June, the exposure to credit risk for trade and other contract receivables by type of

counterparty was as follows.

2025

$M

2024

$M

Not credit

impaired

Credit

impaired

Not credit

impaired

Credit

impaired

Business customers54.21.144.23.6

Mass market customers (includes

customer contributions)15.2–17.0–

Third party asset damages–10.0–8.3

Residential and other2.00.13.00.3

Total gross amount71.411.264.212.2

Loss allowance–(6.3)–(5.7)

Total carrying amount71.44.964.26.5

The following table provides information about the exposure to credit risk and expected credit

losses for trade and other receivables as at 30 June.

2025

$M

2024

$M

Gross

amount

Loss

allowance

Gross

amount

Loss

allowance

Not past due37.4(0.3)63.5–

Past due 1-30 days30.6(0.1)2.5(0.2)

Past due 31-120 days5.1(0.3)3.7(0.5)

Past due more than 120 days9.5(5.6)6.7(5.0)

Balance at 30 June82.6(6.3)76.4(5.7)

PoliciesTrade receivables are predominantly billed receivables. Sales to business customers are billed

monthly. Trade receivables from mass market, residential and other customers are recognised

as they are originated.

Other receivables represent the amount of contractual cash flows that the group expects

to collect from third parties but that did not arise from contracts with customers. Where

contractual cash flows are expected or contracted to be received after 12 months, the balance

is presented as non-current.

Expected credit lossesIn assessing credit losses for trade receivables, the group applies the simplified approach and

records lifetime expected credit losses (“ECLs”) on trade receivables. The group considers both

quantitative and qualitative inputs. Quantitative data includes past collection rates, industry

statistics, ageing of receivables, and trading outlook. Qualitative inputs include past trading

history with the group.

Lifetime ECLs result from all possible default events over the expected life of a trade

receivable. The group considers the probability of default upon initial recognition of the trade

receivable, based on reasonable and available information on the group’s customers and

groups of customers. The group’s trade receivables are monitored in two groups: business

customers, and mass market residential customers.

The group’s customer acceptance process includes a check on credit history, profitability, and

the customer’s external credit rating if available. Different levels of sale limits are also imposed

on customer accounts by nature.

Vector Annual Report 202576

Notes to the financial statements

14. Intangible assets
EASEMENTS

$M

SOFTWARE

$M

GOODWILL

$M

CAPITAL

WORK IN

PROGRESS

$M

TOTAL

$M

Carrying amount

30 June 202318.972.31,101.015.91,208.1

Cost18.9289.51,252.315.91,576.6

Accumulated amortisation–(217.2)––(217.2)

Accumulated impairment––(151.3)–(151.3)

Additions–––25.525.5

Trans fer s0.216.3–(16.5)–

Transferred to held for sale––(9.7)–(9.7)

Impairment––(60.6)–(60.6)

Amortisation for the period–(31.2)––(31.2)

Carrying amount

30 June 202419.157.41,030.724.91,132.1

Cost19.1305.71,242.624.91,592.3

Accumulated amortisation–(248.3)––(248.3)

Accumulated impairment––(211.9)–(211.9)

Additions–––28.328.3

Trans fer s0.331.7–(32.0)–

Sale of discontinued operations–(0.3)(40.6)–(40.9)

Impairment––(37.0)–(37.0)

Amortisation for the period–(30.6)––(30.6)

Carrying amount

30 June 202519.458.2953.121.21,051.9

Cost19.4327.21,202.021.21,569.8

Accumulated amortisation–(269.0)––(269.0)

Accumulated impairment––(248.9)–(248.9)

14.1 Goodwill

Goodwill by cash generating unit

2025

$M

2024

$M

Electricity881.0881.0

Gas Distribution72.1109.1

Liquigas–40.6

Total 953.11,030.7

PoliciesGoodwill represents the excess of the consideration transferred over the fair value of Vector’s

share of the net identifiable assets of an acquired subsidiary.

Goodwill is carried at cost less accumulated impairment losses.

AllocationGoodwill is monitored internally at a group level. It is allocated to the group’s cash generating

units (“CGUs”), for impairment testing purposes.

This is the highest level permissible under NZ IFRS. The CGUs within the group are: electricity,

gas distribution, communications, technology solutions and E-Co Products. The natural gas

CGU ceased to exist following sale of the business on 1 July 2024. Similarly, the Liquigas and

LPG CGUs ceased to exist following sale of the gas trading business on 31 January 2025.

Goodwill is tested at least annually for impairment, comparing the carrying value against the

recoverable amount of the CGU to which it has been allocated.

77

Notes to the financial statements

14. Intangible assets continued
14.1 Goodwill

Key accounting judgementsTo assess impairment, management must estimate the future cash flows of operating

segments including the CGUs that make up those segments. This entails making judgements

including:

—the expected rate of growth of revenues;

—margins expected to be achieved;

—the level of future maintenance expenditure required to support these outcomes; and

—the appropriate discount rate to apply when discounting future cash flows.

AssumptionsThe recoverable amounts attributed to all of the group’s CGUs are calculated on the basis of

value-in-use using discounted cash flow models.

Future cash flows are forecast based on actual results and business plans.

For the electricity, and gas distribution CGUs, a ten-year period has been used due to the

long-term nature of the group’s capital investment in these businesses and the predictable

nature of their cash flows. A five-year period has been used for the E-Co Products, technology

solutions and communications CGUs.

Projected cash flows for regulated businesses are sensitive to regulatory uncertainty.

Estimated future regulated network revenues and the related supportable levels of operating

and capital expenditure are based on default price-quality path determinations issued by the

Commerce Commission and are in line with estimates published in the asset management

plans.

Gas Distribution

The group has recognised an impairment loss of $37.0 million in respect of goodwill allocated

to the gas distribution CGU. The impairment reflects the ongoing uncertainty facing the

gas industry, lower forecast connections and the decline in gas supply in New Zealand.

The recoverable amount of the gas distribution CGU has been determined based on value in

use. A terminal growth rate of -3.0% (2024: 2.0% to 2.3%) and post-tax discount rates between

6.4% to 6.6% (2024: 6.6% to 6.9%) have been applied in determining the recoverable amount for

the gas distribution CGU.

Risk of impairment

The uncertainty of future price-quality path regulation for gas distribution poses a risk for

further impairment. In November 2025, the Commerce Commission are due to release their

draft decision for the next default price-quality path which will apply from 1 October 2026 for

gas distribution businesses. This decision impacts the future cash flows we can expect to earn

from the regulated gas distribution business and will be reflected in the impairment testing

of the gas distribution CGU. The Commission will release the final decision at the end of May

2026.

At 30 June 2025, the carrying value of the gas distribution CGU was $497.7m and is consistent

with the estimated value of the regulated asset base for gas distribution as at that date.

The carrying value of the CGU includes $72.1 million of goodwill allocated by Vector to its gas

distribution business at 30 June 2025.

Electricity

Terminal growth rates in a range of 2.0% to 2.3% (2024: 2.0% to 2.3%) and post-tax discount

rates between 6.0% to 6.3% (2024: 6.1% to 6.4%) have been applied.

14.2 Other intangible assets

PoliciesOther intangible assets are initially measured at cost and subsequently stated at cost less any

accumulated amortisation and impairment losses.

Software intangibles have been assessed as having a finite life greater than 12 months and are

amortised from the date the asset is ready for use on a straight-line basis over its estimated

useful life. The estimated useful lives (years) are as follows:

Software 3 - 10

Easements are not amortised but are tested for impairment at least annually as part of the

assessment of the carrying values of assets against the recoverable amounts of the CGUs to

which they have been allocated.

Vector Annual Report 202578

Notes to the financial statements

15. Property, plant and equipment (PPE)
DISTRIBUTION

SYSTEMS

$M

LAND,

BUILDINGS AND

IMPROVEMENTS

$M

COMPUTER

AND TELCO

EQUIPMENT

$M

OTHER

PLANT AND

EQUIPMENT

$M

CAPITAL WORK

IN PROGRESS

$M

TOTAL

$M

Carrying amount

30 June 20233,814.2189.594.3135.5151.84,385.3

Cost5,372.0238.4216.0303.8151.86,282.0

Accumulated depreciation(1,557.8)(48.9)(121.7)(168.3)–(1,896.7)

Additions––––473.5473.5

Trans fer s399.922.75.15.4(433.1)–

Disposals(10.1)(0.1)–(0.9)–(11.1)

Depreciation for the period(156.1)(3.8)(8.5)(12.1)–(180.5)

Carrying amount

30 June 20244,047.9208.390.9127.9192.24,667.2

Cost5,743.1252.6219.2308.2192.26,715.3

Accumulated depreciation(1,695.2)(44.3)(128.3)(180.3)–(2,048.1)

Additions–––4.9439.6444.5

Trans fer s435.520.418.96.0(480.8)–

Disposals(7.3)(0.3)–(5.3)–(12.9)

Sale of discontinued operations–(9.3)(0.2)(95.4)(0.8)(105.7)

Other––––(3.4)(3.4)

Depreciation for the period(163.9)(4.4)(10.3)(3.2)–(181.8)

Carrying amount

30 June 20254,312.2214.799.334.9146.84,807.9

Cost6,155.8261.6231.550.7146.86,846.4

Accumulated depreciation (1,843.6)(46.9)(132.2)(15.8)– (2,038.5)

PoliciesPPE is initially measured at cost, and subsequently stated at cost less depreciation and any

impairment losses. Cost may include:

—Consideration paid on acquisition

—Costs to bring the asset to working condition

—Materials used in construction

—Direct labour attributable to the item

—Interest costs attributable to the item

—A proportion of directly attributable overheads incurred

—If there is a future obligation to dismantle and/or remove the item, the costs of doing so

Capitalisation of costs stops when the asset is ready for use.

Subsequent expenditure that increases the economic benefits derived from the asset is

capitalised.

Uninstalled assets are stated at the lower of cost and estimated recoverable amount.

Depreciation commences when an asset becomes available for use.

Depreciation of PPE, other than freehold land and capital work in progress, is calculated on

a straight-line basis and expensed over the useful life of the asset. Useful lives are reviewed

regularly and adjusted as appropriate for the revised expectations, including technical

obsolescence, climate risk and regulatory changes.

Estimated useful lives (years) are as follows:

Buildings40 – 60

Distribution systems5 – 70Computer and telco equipment 2 – 50

Leasehold improvements5 – 20Other plant and equipment 2 – 55

79

Notes to the financial statements

15. Property, plant and
equipment (PPE) continued

Key accounting judgementsThe group’s property, plant and equipment, particularly the group’s distribution assets, are

critical to the running of the group’s business. In assessing whether the costs incurred in a

project on the group’s assets are capital in nature, management must apply the following

judgements:

—Whether the costs incurred are directly attributable to bringing an asset to the location

and condition necessary for it to be capable of operating in the manner intended by

management;

—Whether subsequent costs incurred represent an enhancement to existing assets or

maintain the current operating capability of existing assets; and

—Whether overhead costs can be reasonably allocated to the construction or acquisition of

an asset

Capital commitmentsThe estimated capital expenditure for PPE and software intangibles contracted for at balance

date but not provided is $111.7 million for the group (2024: $138.1 million).

16. Leases

16.1 Right of use assets

LAND,

BUILDINGS AND

IMPROVEMENTS

$M

OTHER

PLANT AND

EQUIPMENT

$M

TOTAL

$M

Carrying amount 30 June 202350.64.955.5

Cost68.06.974.9

Accumulated depreciation(17.4)(2.0)(19.4)

Additions12.41.313.7

Disposals(1.0)(0.1)(1.1)

Depreciation for the period(8.0)(1.8)(9.8)

Carrying amount 30 June 202454.04.358.3

Cost76.07.083.0

Accumulated depreciation(22.0)(2.7)(24.7)

Additions2.21.63.8

Disposals(0.7)(0.1)(0.8)

Sale of discontinued operations(10.5)(0.7)(11.2)

Depreciation for the period(7.3)(1.5)(8.8)

Carrying amount 30 June 202537.73.641.3

Cost62.07.669.6

Accumulated depreciation(24.3)(4.0)(28.3)

16.2 Lease liabilities maturity

analysis


MINIMUM

LEASE

PAYMENTS

$M

INTEREST

$M

PRESENT

VALUE

$M

Within one year9.0(3.0)6.0

One to five years29.2(10.6)18.6

Beyond five years29.6(2.7)26.9

Total67.8(16.3)51.5

Current portion6.0

Non-current portion45.5

Total51.5

Vector Annual Report 202580

Notes to the financial statements

16. Leases continued
16.3 Lease expenses included

in profit or loss

2025

$M

2024

$M

Short-term leases –0.1

Interest on leases3.33.3

16.4 Lease cashflows included

in statement of cash flows

2025

$M

2024

$M

Total cash outflow in relation to leases12.113.6

PoliciesRight of use (“ROU”) assets are measured at cost, less any accumulated depreciation and

impairment losses, and adjusted for any remeasurement of lease liabilities. The cost of

ROU assets includes the amount of lease liabilities recognised, initial direct costs incurred,

restoration obligations, and lease payments made at or before the commencement date less

any lease incentives received.

ROU assets are subsequently depreciated using the straight-line method from the

commencement date to the end of the lease term.

Key accounting judgementsFor leases with renewal options, management include one to all available renewal periods

in the lease term if it is reasonably certain that the renewal option or options will be exercised.

In making this judgement management consider the non-cancellable period of the lease,

other leases or assets associated with the lease in question, and other economic factors such

as availability of similar leases in the market and costs to identify and negotiate another lease

if not renewed.

Several property leases in the group’s portfolio of leases contain renewal options. The

group has estimated the impact from potential future lease payments, should it exercise

these extension options, to be an increase of $31.5 million (2024: $30.1 million) in the group’s

lease liability.

81

Notes to the financial statements

17. Investments
17.1 Investment in joint venture

BLUECURRENTPRINCIPAL ACTIVITYCOUNTRY OF INCORPORATIONEQUITY INTEREST HELD

20252024

Bluecurrent Holdings NZ LimitedMetering servicesNew Zealand50%50%

Bluecurrent Holdings (Australia) Pty LtdMetering servicesAustralia50%50%

Movement in the carrying amount of joint ventureNOTE

2025

$M

2024

$M

Opening carrying value684.2727.4

Shareholder loans28(37.7)(20.2)

Share of net profit/(loss) after tax(21.1)(24.9)

Share of other comprehensive income(19.9)1.9

Closing carrying value605.5684.2

Summary financial information

2025

$M

2024

$M

Summary information for Bluecurrent is not adjusted for the percentage ownership held by the

Group (unless stated)

Current assets115.6100.3

Non-current assets2,746.42,678.8

Total asset s2,862.02,779.1

Current liabilities40.450.5

Non-current liabilities1,956.31,782.2

Total liabilities1,996.71,832.7

Net assets (100%)865.4946.4

Group’s share of net assets432.7473.2

Revenue324.6291.1

Depreciation and amortisation(123.0)(124.2)

Interest expense(117.3)(113.9)

Income tax (expense)/benefit(3.6)6.3

Net profit/(loss) after tax(42.1)(49.7)

Other comprehensive income(39.0)3.5

Total other comprehensive income(81.1)(46.2)

Included in the summary financial information above, Bluecurrent held cash and cash equivalents at 30 June 2025 of

$55.2 million (30 June 2024: $51.4 million), and non-current financial liabilities excluding payables and provisions at 30 June 2025

of $1,827.6 million (30 June 2024: $1,644.7 million).

2025

$M

2024

$M

Reconciliation of the carrying amount of the Group’s investment in Bluecurrent:

Group’s share of net assets432.7473.2

Add: Effect of translation on foreign operations 1.62.1

Add: Shareholder loans171.2208.9

Carrying value of investment in joint venture605.5684.2

Vector Annual Report 202582

Notes to the financial statements

17.2 Investments in subsidiaries
Material entities and holding companies in the group are listed below.

PERCENTAGE HELD

PRINCIPAL ACTIVITY20252024

Trading subsidiaries

Vector Investment Holdings LimitedHolding company100%100%

Vector MeterCo LimitedHolding company100%100%

Liquigas LimitedBulk LPG storage, distribution,

and management

–60%

Vector Communications LimitedTelecommunications 100%100%

Vector ESPS Trustee LimitedTrustee company100%100%

Vector Energy Solutions LimitedHolding company100%100%

Vector Energy Solutions (Australia) Pty LimitedEnergy solutions services100%100%

E-Co Products Group LimitedHolding company100%100%

Cristal Air International LimitedVentilation, heating and water

systems sales and assembly

100%100%

Vector Technology Solutions LimitedTechnology services100%100%

Vector Auckland Property LimitedAssets holding company 100%100%

Vector Northern Property LimitedAssets holding company100%100%

Equalise Cyber Security Limited (formerly VPS Pacific Limited)Cyber security solutions100%100%

Vector Technology Solutions Holdings USA LLCHolding company100%–

VTS USA LLCTechnology services100%–

Non-trading subsidiaries

Vector Advanced Metering Assets (Australia) LimitedInvestment company100%100%

Vector Gas Trading LimitedHolding company100%100%

Vector SPV No. 1 Limited (formerly On Gas Limited)Holding company100%100%

Vector SPV No. 2 Limited (formerly PowerSmart NZ Limited)Holding company100%100%

PoliciesSubsidiaries are entities controlled directly or indirectly by the parent. Vector holds over 50% of

the voting rights in all entities reported as subsidiaries. The financial statements of subsidiaries

are consolidated into the group’s financial statements. Intra-group balances and transactions

between group subsidiary companies are eliminated on consolidation.

Overseas subsidiariesAll subsidiaries are incorporated in New Zealand, except for:

—Vector Energy Solutions (Australia) Pty Limited, which is incorporated in Australia; and

—Vector Technology Solutions Holdings USA LLC and VTS USA LLC, which are both

incorporated in the United States of America.

Sale of subsidiariesOn 1 August 2025, the group sold its shares in E-Co Products Group Limited and its

subsidiary Cristal Air International Limited.

17. Investments continued

17.1 Investment in joint venture continued

Policies

A joint venture is where Vector shares joint control over an entity or group of entities and has

rights to the net assets of the arrangement. Investments in joint ventures are accounted for

using the equity method.

Bluecurrent

Vector’s interest in Bluecurrent consists of a 50% ownership of Bluecurrent Holdings NZ

Limited and Bluecurrent Holdings (Australia) Pty Limited respectively which is jointly

controlled with QIC Private Capital Pty Limited (QIC).

Vector has assessed that the contractual arrangement governing Bluecurrent meets the criteria

of a joint venture. Given the shares of Bluecurrent are stapled, disclosure has been consolidated.

Shareholder loansThe shareholder loans receivable from the joint venture are carried at amortised cost.

83

Notes to the financial statements

18. Income tax expense/(benefit)
Reconciliation of income tax expense/(benefit) – continuing operationsNOTE

2025

$M

2024

$M

Profit/(loss) before income tax – continuing operations241.2173.3

Tax at current rate of 28% 67.548.5

Current tax adjustments:

Share of net loss in joint ventures5.97.0

Fair value movements2.13.7

Impairment of goodwill10.416.8

Other1.20.3

(Over)/under provisions in prior periods(3.3)2.6

Deferred tax adjustments:

Buildings depreciation adjustment–20.5

(Over)/under provisions in prior periods2.7(1.7)

Income tax expense/(benefit) – continuing operations86.597.7

Comprising:

Current tax18.717.4

Deferred tax 1967.880.3

PoliciesIncome tax expense/(benefit) comprises current and deferred tax and is calculated using rates

enacted or substantively enacted at balance date.

Current and deferred tax is recognised in profit or loss unless the tax relates to items in

other comprehensive income, in which case the tax is recognised as an adjustment in other

comprehensive income against the item to which it relates.

Income tax assets are not discounted, in line with the economic substance of the balance.

Income tax assetThe current tax asset has accumulated from the prepayment of the group’s tax liability and

the group’s previous policy of paying fully imputed dividends. Vector expects to realise the

current tax asset through meeting obligations from future taxable profits. Vector has a legally

enforceable right to use the tax asset to offset current tax payable.

As at 30 June 2025, Vector recognised a current income tax asset of $19.6 million

(2024: $20.2 million) and a non-current income tax asset of $69.0 million (2024: $85.3 million).

Imputation creditsThere are no imputation credits available for use as at 30 June 2025 (2024: nil), as the

imputation account has a debit balance as of that date.

Pillar Two Model RulesVector is within the scope of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development

(“OECD”) Pillar Two Model Rules (“Pillar Two”). Pillar Two legislation was enacted in

New Zealand, the jurisdiction in which Vector Limited was incorporated, from 1 July 2025.

For some entities within the group, such as subsidiaries in Australia, the Pillar Two rules came

into effect from 1 July 2024.

The group applies the exception to recognising and disclosing information about deferred

tax assets and liabilities related to Pillar Two income taxes, as provided in the amendments

to IAS 12 Income taxes issued in May 2023.

Under Pillar Two legislation, the group is liable to pay a top-up tax if the effective tax rate

(“ETR”) per jurisdiction is below the 15% minimum rate. The group has assessed its exposure

to the Pillar Two legislation in Australia and New Zealand. For the period ended 30 June 2025,

the group’s operations have satisfied the transitional safe harbour rules for all jurisdictions,

and therefore no top-up tax exposure arises in Australia or New Zealand.

Vector Annual Report 202584

Notes to the financial statements

19. Deferred tax
Deferred tax liability/(asset)

PPE AND

INTANGIBLES

$M

PROVISIONS

AND

ACCRUALS

$M

HEDGE

RESERVES

$M

ROU

ASSETS

$M

LEASE

LIABILITIES

$M

OTHER

$M

TOTAL

$M

Balance at 30 June 2023656.4(4.9)21.713.9(15.7)17.8689.2

Recognised in profit or

loss – continuing operations78.71.0––(0.7)1.380.3

Recognised in other

comprehensive income––(11.5)–––(11.5)

Deferred tax associated with

discontinued operations–2.1––––2.1

Balance at 30 June 2024735.1(1.8)10.213.9(16.4)19.1760.1

Recognised in profit or

loss – continuing operations70.4(3.1)–0.8(1.3)1.067.8

Recognised in other

comprehensive income––(14.5)–––(14.5)

Deferred tax associated with

discontinued operations(1.8)2.2–(3.1)3.3–0.6

Balance at 30 June 2025803.7(2.7)(4.3)11.6(14.4)20.1814.0

The group’s deferred tax position is presented in the balance sheet as follows:

2025

$M

2024

$M

Deferred tax asset(0.1)(2.1)

Deferred tax liability814.1762.2

Total814.0760.1

PoliciesDeferred tax is:

—Recognised on temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and

liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for taxation purposes.

—Not recognised for the initial recognition of goodwill.

—Measured at tax rates that are expected to be applied to the temporary differences when

they reverse

20. Trade and other payables

2025

$M

2024

$M

Current

Trade payables 169.4182.5

Employee benefits 17.318.1

Interest payable19.722.5

Balance at 30 June206.4223.1

Employee benefitsVector accrues employee benefits which remain unpaid or unused at balance date, and

amounts expected to be paid under short-term incentive plans.

85

Notes to the financial statements

21. Provisions
NOTE

DECOMMISSIONING

$M

PRODUCT

WARRANTY

$M

OTHER

$M

TOTAL

$M

Balance at 30 June 20247.10.71.69.4

Additions0.3–0.20.5

Impact of discounting100.4––0.4

Payments––(0.7)(0.7)

Reversed to profit or loss–(0.3)(0.6)(0.9)

Sale of discontinued operations(7.8)––(7.8)

Balance at 30 June 2025–0.40.50.9

Comprising:

Current–0.40.50.9

Non-current––––

PoliciesThe group recognises a provision when the group has a present obligation – legal or

constructive – as a result of a past event, it is more likely than not that the resulting liability will

be required to be settled, and the amount required to settle can be reliably estimated.

Decommissioning The decommissioning provisions represented the present value of the future expected

costs for dismantling the depot assets of Liquigas Limited situated at various regions in New

Zealand. Timing of economic outflows represented management’s best estimate of the end of

the useful life of the plant and associated assets.

On 31 January 2025, Vector completed the sale of the group’s 60.25% shareholding in Liquigas

Limited. The decommissioning provision was included in the disposal group. Refer to note 6

for further details.

Product warrantyThe group provides for restatement costs and warranty claims on products sold or installed.

Provisions are recognised when the product is sold, or the service is provided to the customer.

Initial recognition is based on historical experience and subsequently revisited at each

reporting date.

Other provisionsThese provisions comprise amounts that may be required to be utilised within one year or

a longer period dependent on ongoing negotiations with third parties involved. There are

currently no foreseeable uncertainties which would be reasonably expected to lead to material

changes in the amounts provided.

Vector Annual Report 202586

Notes to the financial statements

22. Fair values
NOTE

MATERIAL

OBSERVABLE

INPUTS

(LEVEL 2 INPUTS)

2025

$M

MATERIAL

UNOBSERVABLE

INPUTS

(LEVEL 3 INPUTS)

2025

$M

MATERIAL

OBSERVABLE

INPUTS

(LEVEL 2 INPUTS)

2024

$M

MATERIAL

UNOBSERVABLE

INPUTS

(LEVEL 3 INPUTS)

2024

$M

Assets measured at fair value

Derivative financial instruments2466.3–86.4–

Investment in private equity––0.5–

Contingent consideration12–28.1–42.3

Balance at 30 June66.328.186.942.3

Liabilities measured at fair value

Derivative financial instruments24(143.9)–166.2–

Balance at 30 June(143.9)–166.2–

PoliciesThe table above provides the fair value measurement hierarchy of the group’s assets and

liabilities that are measured at fair value.

The group estimates all fair values using the discounted cash flows method. All assets and

liabilities for which fair value is measured and disclosed in the financial statements are

categorised within the fair value hierarchy, described as follows:

Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities; or

Level 2: Inputs other than quoted prices included within level 1 that are observable for the

asset or liability, either directly (prices) or indirectly (derived from prices); or

Level 3: Inputs for the asset or liability that are not based on observable market data

(unobservable inputs).

Derivative financial

instruments

Fair value is calculated using the discounted cash flow method, estimated using observable

interest yield curves and/or foreign exchange market prices. The carrying values of the

financial instruments are the fair values excluding any interest receivable or payable, which is

separately presented in the balance sheet in other receivables or other payables.

Contingent considerationFair value is calculated using the discounted cash flow method. The group made assumptions

on unobservable inputs including, amongst others, future raw gas volume from the Kapuni

gas field, future LPG prices, future oil prices, foreign exchange rates, and an appropriate

discount rate. Further details on the inputs are as follows:

—Future raw gas volume from the Kapuni gas field is based on published forecasts from the

Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment;

—Future LPG prices are based on an independent financial institution’s commodity price

forecasts;

—Future oil prices are based on S&P Capital IQ forecast data;

—Future natural gas prices are based on an independent expert’s commodity price forecast;

—Future foreign exchange rates are based on an independent financial institution’s foreign

exchange rate forecasts; and

—Discount rate of 10.8% (2024: 11.0%), representing market discount rates as applicable to the

remaining life of the Kapuni gas field.

87

Notes to the financial statements

22. Fair values continued
Description of material

unobservable inputs

The table below summarises the material level 3 unobservable inputs used by the group in

measuring fair values and related sensitivity analyses.

2025

MATERIAL

UNOBSERVABLE INPUTS

RANGE AND

ESTIMATES

SENSITIVITY OF VALUATION TO CHANGES IN INPUTS

LOW

VALUATION

IMPACT

$MHIGH

VALUATION

IMPACT

$M

Contingent

consideration

Discount rate10.8%+1.0%-0.8+1.0%+0.9

Future raw gas volume98PJ-2PJ per

annum

-5.9+2PJ per

annum

+5.1

LPG pricing (long-term)US$490/

tonne

-US$50/

tonne

-2.1+US$50/

tonne

+2.1

Oil pricing (long-term)US$76/

barrel

-US$7/

barrel

-2.0+US$7/

barrel

+2.0

2024

MATERIAL

UNOBSERVABLE INPUTS

RANGE AND

ESTIMATES

SENSITIVITY OF VALUATION TO CHANGES IN INPUTS

LOW

VALUATION

IMPACT

$MHIGH

VALUATION

IMPACT

$M

Contingent

consideration

Discount rate11.0%-1.0%-1.3+1.0%+1.4

Future raw gas volume136PJ-2PJ per

annum

-7.3+2PJ per

annum

+6.7

LPG pricing (long-term)US$485/

tonne

-US$50/

tonne

-3.7+US$50/

tonne

+3.7

Oil pricing (long-term)US$83/

barrel

-US$7/

barrel

-2.6+US$7/

barrel

+2.6

Vector Annual Report 202588

Notes to the financial statements

23. Borrowings
2025CURRENCY

MATURITY

DATE

FACE

VALUE

$M

UNAMORTISED

COSTS

$M

FAIR VALUE

ADJUSTMENT

ON HEDGED

RISK

$M

CARRYING

VALUE

$M

FAIR VALUE

$M

Bank facilities – floating rateNZDJul 2026 –

Feb 2028

205.0(0.9)– 204.1205.1

Capital bonds – fixed rateNZD–307.2(0.8)– 306.4323.2

Wholesale bonds – fixed rateNZDOct 2026170.0(0.1)– 169.9166.2

Senior notes – fixed rateUSDOct 2027 –

Mar 2035

1,212.9(2.3)(66.1)1,144.51,208.8

Senior bonds – fixed rateNZDNov 2027225.0(0.3)(0.5)224.2225.8

Balance at 30 June2,120.1(4.4)(66.6)2,049.12,129.1

2024CURRENCY

MATURITY

DATE

FACE

VALUE

$M

UNAMORTISED

COSTS

$M

FAIR VALUE

ADJUSTMENT

ON HEDGED

RISK

$M

CARRYING

VALUE

$M

FAIR VALUE

$M

Bank facilities – floating rateNZDJul 2024 –

Jul 2026

–(0.3)–(0.3)–

Capital bonds – fixed rateNZD–307.2(1.1)–306.1316.5

Wholesale bonds – fixed rateNZDOct 2026170.0(0.1)–169.9157.0

Senior notes – fixed rateUSDOct 2027 –

Mar 2035

1,212.9(2.7)(118.7)1,091.51,159.7

Senior bonds – fixed rateNZDMay 2025 –

Nov 2027

475.0(1.0)(2.7)471.3460.3

Balance at 30 June2,165.1(5.2)(121.4)2,038.52,093.5

PoliciesBorrowings are initially recorded at fair value, net of transaction costs. After initial recognition,

borrowings are measured at amortised cost with any difference between the initial recognised

amount and the redemption value being recognised in interest costs in profit or loss over the

period of the borrowing using the effective interest rate method.

The carrying value of borrowings includes the principal converted at contract rates (face value),

unamortised costs and a fair value adjustment for the component of the risk that is hedged.

The fair value is calculated by discounting the future contractual cash flows at current market

interest rates that are available for similar financial instruments. The fair value of all borrowings,

calculated for disclosure purposes, are classified as level 2 on the fair value hierarchy.

89

Notes to the financial statements

23. Borrowings continued
Bank facilitiesNew floating rate bank facilities were added as part of our debt management activities.

Capital bondsCapital bonds of $307.2 million are perpetual subordinated bonds with the next election

date set as 15 June 2027. The interest rate was fixed at 6.23% at the previous election date of

15 June 2022.

Wholesale bondsWholesale bonds of $170.0 million with a fixed rate of 1.575% maturing in October 2026.

Senior bondsSenior bonds of $225.0 million with a fixed rate of 3.69% maturing in November 2027.

In May 2025, the group repaid $250.0 million of senior bonds.

Senior notesThe tranches of USD denominated senior notes and the corresponding NZD values are

shown below:

Date issuedNZ $MUS $MDate of Maturity

March 2020

573.9360.0October 2032

223.2140.0October 2035

October 2017

277.2200.0October 2027

138.6100.0October 2029

CovenantsAll borrowings are unsecured and are subject to negative pledge arrangements.

Under the terms of its borrowing arrangements, the group is subject to various lending

covenants. The key covenants include interest coverage and debt to equity gearing. The group

was in compliance with all covenant requirements for the years ended 30 June 2025 and

30 June 2024.

Vector Annual Report 202590

Notes to the financial statements

24. Derivatives and hedge accounting
CASH FLOW HEDGESFAIR VALUE HEDGESCOST OF HEDGINGTOTAL

2025

$M

2024

$M

2025

$M

2024

$M

2025

$M

2024

$M

2025

$M

2024

$M

Derivative assets

Cross currency swaps–– 57.239.6(3.0)(4.0)54.235.6

Interest rate swaps11.950.7––––11.950.7

Forward exchange contracts0.20.1––––0.20.1

Total 12.150.857.239.6(3.0)(4.0)66.386.4

Derivative liabilities

Cross currency swaps27.130.7(146.8)(183.1)(9.3)(8.6)(129.0)(161.0)

Interest rate swaps(14.1)(2.0)(0.5)(2.7)––(14.6)(4.7)

Forward exchange contracts(0.3)(0.5)––––(0.3)(0.5)

Total 12.728.2(147.3)(185.8)(9.3)(8.6)(143.9)(166.2)

Key observable market data for fair value measurement

20252024

Foreign currency exchange (FX) rates as at 30 June

NZD-USD FX rate0.60960.6086

Interest rate swap rates

NZD3.16% to 4.08%4.44% to 5.63%

USD3.40% to 4.33%3.96% to 5.33%

Sensitivity to changes

in market rates

The graphs below illustrate the impact on derivative valuations of possible changes in interest

rates and foreign exchange rates, assuming all other variables are held constant.

Impact on comprehensive income

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

 interest rates (-%/+%)

 interest rates (-%/+%)

 foreign exchange rates (-%/+%)

 foreign exchange rates (-%/+%)

Rate increaseRate decrease

Impact on profit or loss

 interest rates (-%/+%)

 interest rates (-%/+%)

 foreign exchange rates (-%/+%)

 foreign exchange rates (-%/+%)

Rate increaseRate decrease

.

..

.

.

.

.

.

91

Notes to the financial statements

24. Derivatives and hedge
accounting continued

PoliciesVector initially recognises derivatives at fair value on the date the derivative contract is entered

into, and subsequently they are re-measured to their fair value at each balance date. All

derivatives are classified as level 2 on the fair value hierarchy explained in note 22.

Vector designates certain derivatives as either:

—Fair value hedges (of the fair value of recognised assets or liabilities or firm commitments); or

—Cash flow hedges (of highly probable forecast transactions).

At inception each transaction is documented, detailing:

—The economic relationship and the hedge ratio between hedging instruments and hedged

items;

—The risk management objectives and strategy for undertaking the hedge transaction; and

—The assessment (initially and on an ongoing basis) of whether the derivatives that are used

in the hedging transaction are highly effective in offsetting changes in fair values or cash

flows of hedged items.

The underlying risk of the derivative contracts is identical to the hedged risk component (i.e.

the interest rate risk and the foreign exchange risk) therefore the group has established a one-

to-one hedge ratio. Effectiveness is assessed by comparing the changes of the hedged items

and hedging instruments.

Hedge accounting is discontinued when the hedge instrument expires or is sold, terminated,

exercised, or no longer qualifies for hedge accounting.

Fair value hedgesVector has entered into cross currency interest rate swaps and interest rate swaps (the

hedging instruments) to hedge the interest rate risk and foreign currency risk (the hedged

risk) arising in relation to its USD senior notes and NZD senior bonds (the hedged items). These

transactions have been designated into fair value hedges.

The following are recognised in profit or loss:

—The change in fair value of the hedging instruments; and

—The change in fair value of the underlying hedged items attributable to the hedged risk.

Once hedging is discontinued, the fair value adjustment to the carrying amount of the hedged

item arising from the hedged risk is amortised through profit or loss from that date through to

maturity of the hedged item.

Cash flow hedgesVector has entered into interest rate swaps and cross currency interest rate swaps (the

hedging instruments) to hedge the variability in cash flows arising from interest rate and

foreign currency exchange rate movements in relation to its NZD floating rate notes and

USD senior notes.

The effective portion of changes in the fair value of the hedging instruments are recognised in

other comprehensive income.

The following are recognised in profit or loss:

—any gain or loss relating to the ineffective portion of the hedging instrument; and

—fair value changes in the hedging instrument previously accumulated in other

comprehensive income, in the periods when the hedged item is recognised in profit or loss.

Once hedging is discontinued, any cumulative gain or loss previously recognised in other

comprehensive income is recognised in profit or loss either:

—at the same time as the forecast transaction; or

—immediately if the transaction is no longer expected to occur.

Market rate sensitivityAll derivatives are measured at fair value. A change in the market data used to determine fair

value will have an impact on Vector’s financial statements.

The graphs on the previous page show the sensitivity of the financial statements to a range of

possible changes in market data at balance date.

Vector Annual Report 202592

Notes to the financial statements

24. Derivatives and hedge
accounting continued

2025

$M

2024

$M

DERIVATIVES

POSITION AS PER

BALANCE SHEET

AMOUNT AFTER

APPLYING RIGHTS

OF OFFSET UNDER

ISDA AGREEMENTS

DERIVATIVES

POSITION AS PER

BALANCE SHEET

AMOUNT AFTER

APPLYING RIGHTS

OF OFFSET UNDER

ISDA AGREEMENTS

Derivative assets66.312.486.428.6

Derivative liabilities (143.9)(90.0)(166.2)(108.4)

Net amount(77.6)(77.6)(79.8)(79.8)

Rights to offsetVector enters into derivative transactions under International Swaps and Derivatives

Association (ISDA) master agreements. The ISDA agreements do not meet the criteria for

offsetting in the balance sheet for accounting purposes. This is because Vector does not

have any currently legally enforceable right to offset recognised amounts. Under the ISDA

agreements the right to offset is enforceable only on the occurrence of future events such as

a default on the bank loans or other credit events. The potential net impact of this offsetting

is disclosed in column ‘amount after applying rights of offset under ISDA agreements. Vector

does not hold and is not required to post collateral against its derivative positions.

93

Notes to the financial statements

24. Derivatives and hedge
accounting continued

24.1 Effects of hedge accounting on the financial position and performance

The tables below demonstrate the impact of hedged items and the hedging instruments designated in hedging relationships:

—The NZD floating rate exposure includes $1,030.0 million arising from hedging the USD senior bonds (2024: $910.0 million) as

allowable under NZ IFRS 9 Financial Instruments;

—The fixed rate interest rate swaps include $695.0 million of forward starting swaps (2024: $410.0 million).

2025

FACE

VALUE

$M

WEIGHTED

AVERAGE

RATE

ACCUMU-

LATED FAIR

VALUE

HEDGE

ADJUST-

MENTS

$M

CARRYING

AMOUNT

ASSETS/

(LIABILITIES)

$M

CHANGE IN

FAIR VALUE

USED FOR

MEASURING

INEFFECTIVE-

NESS –

CASHFLOW

HEDGE

$M

CHANGE IN

FAIR VALUE

USED FOR

MEASURING

INEFFECTIVE-

NESS – FAIR

VALUE

HEDGE

$M

HEDGING

(GAIN)

OR LOSS

RECOGNISED

IN CASH

FLOW HEDGE

RESERVE

$M

(GAIN)

OR LOSS

RECOGNISED

IN COST OF

HEDGING

$M

Cash flow hedge – Interest risk

Hedged item:

NZD floating

rate exposure on

borrowings(1,235.0) – – (2.3)– – –

Hedging instrument:

Fixed rate interest

rate swaps(1,930.0)3.0%–(2.3)(2.3)– 50.9–

Cash flow and fair value hedge – Interest and exchange risks

Hedged item: USD

fixed rate exposure

on borrowings (1,212.9) – (1,144.4)22.5(54.0)– –

Hedging instrument:

Cross currency swaps (1,212.9)floating66.1(74.8)27.154.01.60.2

Fair value hedge – Interest risk

Hedged item: NZD

fixed rate exposure

on borrowings(50.0) 0.5–– (2.2)– –

Hedging instrument:

Interest rate swap(50.0)floating– (0.5)– 2.2– –

Ineffectiveness4.6–

Vector Annual Report 202594

Notes to the financial statements

24. Derivatives and hedge
accounting continued

24.1 Effects of hedge accounting on the financial position and performance continued

2024

FACE

VALUE

$M

WEIGHTED

AVERAGE

RATE

ACCUMU-

LATED FAIR

VALUE

HEDGE

ADJUST-

MENTS

$M

CARRYING

AMOUNT

ASSETS/

(LIABILITIES)

$M

CHANGE IN

FAIR VALUE

USED FOR

MEASURING

INEFFECTIVE-

NESS –

CASHFLOW

HEDGE

$M

CHANGE IN

FAIR VALUE

USED FOR

MEASURING

INEFFECTIVE-

NESS – FAIR

VALUE

HEDGE

$M

HEDGING

(GAIN)

OR LOSS

RECOGNISED

IN CASH

FLOW HEDGE

RESERVE

$M

(GAIN)

OR LOSS

RECOGNISED

IN COST OF

HEDGING

$M

Cash flow hedge – Interest risk

Hedged item:

NZD floating

rate exposure on

borrowings(910.0) – – 48.7– – –

Hedging instrument:

Fixed rate Interest

rate swaps(1,320.0)2.5%– 48.748.7–35.1–

Cash flow and fair value hedge – Interest and exchange risks

Hedged item: USD

fixed rate exposure

on borrowings (1,212.9) – (1,091.5)25.4(2.1)– –

Hedging instrument:

Cross currency swaps (1,212.9)floating118.7(125.4)30.72.9(0.6)(6.6)

Fair value hedge – Interest risk

Hedged item: NZD

fixed rate exposure

on borrowing(50.0) 2.7–– (1.0)––

Hedging instrument:

Interest rate swap(50.0)floating– (2.7)– 1.0––

Ineffectiveness5.30.8

Hedging instruments and hedged items are included in the line items “Derivatives” and “Borrowings” respectively in the

balance sheet. The source of ineffectiveness is largely due to counterparty credit risk on the derivative instruments. Hedge

ineffectiveness is included in the “Fair value change on financial instruments” in the profit or loss. Please refer to the asset and

liability positions of the hedging instruments in Note 24 derivatives and hedge accounting table above.

24.2 Fair value changes on

financial instruments

NOTE

2025

$M

2024

$M

Recognised in profit or loss

Fair value movement on hedging instruments 56.23.9

Fair value movement on hedged items(56.2)(3.1)

Ineffectiveness from cash flow hedge relationships(0.7)0.4

Fair value change on contingent consideration12(7.8)(13.2)

Total gains/(losses)(8.5)(12.0)

95

Notes to the financial statements

24. Derivatives and hedge
accounting continued

24.3 Reconciliation of

changes in hedge reserves

Hedge reserves

2025

CASHFLOW

HEDGE

RESERVE

$M

COST OF

HEDGING

$M

TOTAL

$M

Opening balance(35.3)9.1(26.2)

Hedging gains or losses recognised in OCI –

Interest rate swaps24.5–24.5

Hedging gains or losses recognised in OCI –

Cross currency swaps41.7(0.2)41.5

Hedging gains or losses recognised in OCI –

Forward exchange contracts (0.2)–(0.2)

Transferred to profit or loss – Interest rate swaps26.4–26.4

Transferred to profit or loss – Cross currency swaps(40.1)–(40.1)

Recognised as basis adjustment to non-financial

assets(0.2)–(0.2)

Deferred tax on change in reserves(14.6)0.1(14.5)

Closing balance2.29.011.2

Hedge reserves

2024

CASH FLOW

HEDGE

RESERVE

$M

COST OF

HEDGING

$M

TOTAL

$M

Opening balance(60.0)4.3(55.7)

Hedging gains or losses recognised in OCI –

Interest rate swaps(6.3)–(6.3)

Hedging gains or losses recognised in OCI –

Cross currency swaps38.66.645.2

Hedging gains or losses recognised in OCI –

Forward exchange contracts 0.4–0.4

Transferred to profit or loss – Interest rate swaps41.5–41.5

Transferred to profit or loss – Cross currency swaps(39.1)–(39.1)

Recognised as basis adjustment to non-financial

assets(0.7)–(0.7)

Deferred tax on change in reserves(9.7)(1.8)(11.5)

Closing balance(35.3)9.1(26.2)

Vector Annual Report 202596

Notes to the financial statements

25. Financial risk management
Risk management frameworkVector has a comprehensive treasury policy, approved by the board, to manage financial risks

arising from business activity. The policy outlines the objectives and approach that the group

applies to manage:

—Interest rate risk;

—Credit risk;

—Liquidity risk;

—Foreign exchange risk; and

—Funding risk.

For each risk type, any position outside the policy limits requires the prior approval of the

board. Each risk is monitored on a regular basis and reported to the board.

25.1 Interest rate risk

Interest rate exposure

2025

< 1 YEAR

$M

1 - 2 YEARS

$M

2 - 5 YEARS

$M

> 5 YEARS

$M

TOTAL

$M

Interest rate exposure: borrowings205.0477.2640.8797.12,120.1

Derivative contracts:

Interest rate swaps(1,160.0)10.0840.0310.0–

Cross currency swaps1,212.9–(415.8)(797.1)–

Net interest rate exposure257.9487.21,065.0310.02,120.1

Interest rate exposure

2024

< 1 YEAR

$M

1 - 2 YEARS

$M

2 - 5 YEARS

$M

> 5 YEARS

$M

TOTAL

$M

Interest rate exposure: borrowings250.0–979.4935.72,165.1

Derivative contracts:

Interest rate swaps(850.0)300.0170.0380.0–

Cross currency swaps1,212.9–(277.2)(935.7)–

Net interest rate exposure612.9300.0872.2380.02,165.1

PoliciesVector is exposed to interest rate risk through its borrowing activities.

Interest rate exposures are managed primarily by entering into derivative contracts. The

main objectives are to minimise the cost of total borrowings, control variations in the interest

expense of the borrowings from year to year, and where practicable to match the interest rate

risk profile of the borrowings with the risk profile of the group’s assets.

The board has set and actively monitors maximum and minimum limits for the net interest

rate exposure profile.

25.2 Credit risk

PoliciesCredit risk represents the risk of cash flow losses arising from counterparty defaults. Vector is

exposed to credit risk in the normal course of business from:

—Trade receivable transactions with business and mass market residential customers; and

—Financial instruments transactions with financial institutions.

The carrying amounts of financial assets represent the group’s maximum exposure to credit

risk.

The group has credit policies in place to minimise the impact of exposure to credit risk and

associated financial losses:

—The board must approve placement of cash, short-term cash deposits or derivatives with

financial institutions whose credit rating is less than A+. As at 30 June 2025, all financial

instruments are held with financial institutions with credit rating above A+;

—The board sets limits and monitors exposure to financial institutions; and

—Exposure is spread across a range of financial institutions. Where we deem there is credit

exposure to energy retailers and customers, the group minimises its risk by performing

credit evaluations and/or requiring a bond or other form of security.

97

Notes to the financial statements

25. Financial risk management
continued

25.3 Liquidity risk

Contractual cash flows maturity profile

2025

PAYABLE

<1 YEAR

$M

PAYABLE

1–2 YEARS

$M

PAYABLE

2–5 YEARS

$M

PAYABLE

>5 YEARS

$M

TOTAL

CONTRACTUAL

CASH FLOWS

$M

Non-derivative financial liabilities

Trade payables169.4–––169.4

Contract liabilities0.71.6––2.3

Lease liabilities9.010.219.029.667.8

Borrowings: interest71.368.090.262.6292.1

Borrowings: principal205.0477.2717.1820.22,219.5

Derivative financial (assets)/liabilities

Cross currency swaps: inflow(39.2)(39.1)(578.2)(882.9)(1,539.4)

Cross currency swaps: outflow62.162.3581.0931.91,637.3

Forward exchange contracts: inflow(14.8)(1.0)(0.3)–(16.1)

Forward exchange contracts: outflow14.81.10.3–16.2

Net settled derivatives

Interest rate swaps (4.4)2.84.8(0.3)2.9

Group contractual cash flows473.9583.1833.9961.12,852.0

Contractual cash flows maturity profile

2024

PAYABLE

<1 YEAR

$M

PAYABLE

1-2 YEARS

$M

PAYABLE

2-5 YEARS

$M

PAYABLE

>5 YEARS

$M

TOTAL

CONTRACTUAL

CASH FLOWS

$M

Non-derivative financial liabilities

Trade payables182.5–––182.5

Contract liabilities2.23.51.1–6.8

Lease liabilities11.113.322.547.694.5

Borrowings: interest77.969.4133.587.6368.4

Borrowings: principal250.0–1,030.8985.92,266.7

Derivative financial (assets)/liabilities

Cross currency swaps: inflow(39.4)(39.3)(429.2)(1,073.5)(1,581.4)

Cross currency swaps: outflow89.579.1471.31,126.61,766.5

Forward exchange contracts: inflow(16.2)–––(16.2)

Forward exchange contracts: outflow16.7–––16.7

Net settled derivatives

Interest rate swaps (29.6)(17.5)(4.9)(0.6)(52.6)

Group contractual cash flows544.7108.51,225.11,173.63,051.9

Contractual cash flowsThe above table shows the timing of non-discounted cash flows for all financial instrument

liabilities and derivatives.

The cash flows for bank facilities, included in borrowings, are disclosed on the basis of their

contractual repayment terms for the individual drawdowns.

The cash flows for capital bonds, included in borrowings, are disclosed as payable within 1-2

years as the next election date set for the capital bonds is 15 June 2027 (2024: 2-5 years) and

the bonds have no contractual maturity date.

Vector Annual Report 202598

Notes to the financial statements

25. Financial risk management
continued

25.3 Liquidity risk continued

PoliciesVector is exposed to liquidity risk where there is a risk that the group may encounter difficulty

in meeting its day to day obligations due to the timing of cash receipts and payments.

The objective is to ensure that adequate liquid assets and funding sources are available at all

times to meet both short-term and long-term commitments. The board has set a minimum

headroom requirement for committed facilities over Vector’s anticipated 18-month peak

borrowing requirement.

At balance date, Vector has access to undrawn funds of $435.0 million (2024: $575.0 million).

25.4 Foreign exchange risk

PoliciesVector is exposed to foreign exchange risk through its borrowing activities, and foreign

currency denominated expenditure.

Foreign exchange exposure is primarily managed through entering into derivative contracts.

The board requires that all material foreign currency borrowings and expenditure are hedged

into NZD at the time of commitment to drawdown or when the exposure is highly probable.

Hence, at balance date there is no material exposure to foreign currency risk.

25.5 Funding risk

PoliciesFunding risk is the risk that Vector will have difficulty refinancing or raising new debt on

comparable terms to existing facilities. The objective is to spread the concentration of risk so

that if an event occurs the overall cost of funding is not unnecessarily increased. Details of

borrowings are shown in note 23.

The board has set the maximum amount of debt that may mature in any one financial year.

99

Notes to the financial statements

26. Cash flows
26.1 Reconciliation of net profit/

(loss) to net cash flows from/

(used in) operating activities

Reconciliation of net profit/(loss) to net cash

flows from/(used in) operating activities including

discontinued operations

NOTE

2025

$M

2024

$M

Net profit/(loss) for the period167.791.0

Items not associated with operating activities:

Gain on sale of discontinued operations classified as

investing activities(3.9)–

Cost to sell of discontinued operations (1.4)–

Contingent consideration associated with investing

activities12(10.8)(11.4)

PPE items associated with investing activities 8.6(4.7)

Movements in emission units associated with investing

activities(7.4)0.8

Lease liabilities items associated with financing

activities(0.4)(0.3)

(15.3)(15.6)

Non-cash items:

Depreciation and amortisation233.0230.8

Non-cash portion of interest costs (net)(1.4)(17.0)

Fair value change on financial instruments24.28.512.0

Share of net profit/(loss) in joint ventures21.124.9

Impairment of assets and goodwill37.060.6

Increase/(decrease) in deferred tax 68.482.4

Non-cash movements in provisions–0.3

Other non-cash items(1.3)(1.0)

365.3393.0

Changes in assets and liabilities:

Trade and other payables (16.7)(46.2)

Provisions(8.5)(17.1)

Contract liabilities(22.3)(3.0)

Contract assets11.8(12.4)

Inventories14.9(5.3)

Trade and other receivables2.142.7

Income tax 16.218.0

(2.5)(23.3)

Net cash flows from/(used in) operating activities

including discontinued operations515.2445.1

Vector Annual Report 2025100

Notes to the financial statements

26. Cash flows continued
26.2 Reconciliation of

movement of liabilities to cash

flows arising from financing

activities

Reconciliation of movement of

liabilities to cash flows arising

from financing activities

LEASE

LIABILITIESBORROWINGSDERIVATIVESTOTAL

Balance at 1 July 202468.12,038.579.82,186.4

Net repayments–(45.0)–(45.0)

Lease liabilities payments(8.4)––(8.4)

Financing cash flows(8.4)(45.0)–(53.4)

Fair value changes–54.9(2.2)52.7

Borrowing fees paid–(3.7)–(3.7)

Amortisation of borrowing costs–4.4–4.4

ROU asset additions3.8––3.8

ROU asset disposals(12.5)––(12.5)

Other0.5––0.5

As at 30 June 202551.52,049.177.62,178.2

27. Equity

27.1 Share Capital

SharesThe total number of authorised and issued shares is 1,000,000,000 (2024: 1,000,000,000).

All ordinary issued shares are fully paid, have no par value and carry equal voting rights and

equal rights to a surplus on winding up of the parent.

At balance date 26,343 shares (2024: 26,343) are allocated to the employee share purchase

scheme.

27.2 Capital Management

PoliciesVector’s objectives in managing capital are:

—To safeguard the ability of entities within the group to continue as a going concern;

—To provide an adequate return to shareholders by pricing products and services

commensurate with the level of risk; and

—Maintain an investment grade credit rating

Vector manages and may adjust its capital structure in light of changes in economic conditions

and for the risk characteristics of the underlying assets. To achieve this Vector may:

—Adjust its dividend policy;

—Return capital to shareholders; or

—Sell assets to reduce debt.

101

Notes to the financial statements

27. Equity continued
27.3 Financial ratios

Basic and diluted earnings per share

2025

$M

2024

$M

Net profit from continuing operations attributable to

owners of the parent 154.775.6

Net profit from discontinued operation attributable to

owners of the parent 11.813.0

Net profit attributable to owners of the parent166.588.6

Weighted average ordinary shares outstanding during the

period (number of shares)999,973,657999,973,657

Earnings per share from continuing operations15.5 cents7.6 cents

Earnings per share from discontinued operations1.2 cents1.3 cents

Total earnings per share16.7 cents8.9 cents

Net tangible assets per share

2025

$M

2024

$M

Net assets attributable to owners of the parent 3,600.93,761.5

Less total intangible assets (1,051.9)(1,139.7)

Total net tangible assets2,549.02,621.8

Ordinary shares outstanding (number of shares)999,973,657999,973,657

Net tangible assets per share254.9 cents262.2 cents

Economic net debt to economic net debt plus adjusted

equity ratio (“gearing ratio”)

2025

$M

2024

$M

Face value of borrowings2,120.12,165.1

Lease liabilities51.568.1

Less cash and cash equivalents and deposits(23.3)(104.6)

Economic net debt2,148.32,128.6

Total equity3,600.93,776.7

Adjusted for hedge reserves11.2(26.2)

Adjusted equity 3,612.13,750.5

Economic net debt plus adjusted equity 5,760.55,879.1

Gearing ratio37.3%36.2%

Economic net debtEconomic net debt is defined as ‘face value of borrowings and lease liabilities, less cash and

cash equivalents and deposits’.

27.4 Reserves

Hedge reservesHedge reserves comprise the cash flow hedge reserve and cost of hedging.

The cash flow hedge reserve records the effective portion of changes in the fair value of

derivatives that are designated as cash flow hedges.

The gain or loss relating to the ineffective portion is recorded in profit or loss within interest

costs (net).

During the year, a $13.7 million gain (2024: $2.4 million loss) was transferred from the cash flow

hedge reserve to interest expense.

Cost of hedging records the change in the fair value of the cost to convert foreign currency

into New Zealand dollars as required under NZ IFRS 9.

Other reservesOther reserves comprise:

—A share-based payment reserve relating to the employee share purchase scheme. When

shares are vested to the employee, the reserve is offset with a reduction in treasury shares.

—A foreign currency translation reserve to record exchange differences arising from the

translation of the group’s foreign operations.

—A reserve to record the fair value movements in the group’s investments in financial assets.

Vector Annual Report 2025102

Notes to the financial statements

28. Related party transactions
Related partiesRelated parties of the group are:

—Entrust, the group’s ultimate parent entity;

—Bluecurrent, made up of the consolidated groups of Bluecurrent NZ Holdings Limited and

Bluecurrent Holdings (Australia) Pty Limited; and

—Key management personnel, including the group’s directors and the executive team.

Transactions with related parties

2025

$M

2024

$M

Transactions with Entrust

Dividends paid 200.9174.6

Distribution to customers–10.8

Transactions with Bluecurrent

Interest from shareholder loans12.515.4

Provision of metering data services7.45.1

Provision of transitional services6.58.3

Transactions with key management personnel

Salary and other short-term employee benefits8.17.2

Directors’ fees0.91.2

Advances to related parties

2025

$M

2024

$M

Shareholder loans to Bluecurrent

Balance at start of period208.9229.0

Interest capitalised16.011.9

Repayments(51.8)(30.6)

Effect of changes in exchange rates(1.9)(1.4)

Balance at end of period171.2208.9

29. Contingent liabilities

DisclosuresThe directors are aware of claims that have been made against entities of the group and,

where appropriate, have recognised provisions for these within note 21.

No material contingent liabilities have been identified.

30. Events after balance date

Sale of subsidiaryOn 1 August 2025, Vector entered an agreement to sell E-Co Products Group Limited and its

subsidiaries, for $2.5 million. The transaction completed on 1 August 2025. No adjustment is

required to these financial statements in respect of this event.

ApprovalThe financial statements were approved by the board on 22 August 2025.

Final dividendOn 22 August 2025, the board declared a final unimputed dividend for the year ended 30

June 2025 of 13.00 cents per share. No adjustment is required to these financial statements in

respect of this event.

103

Notes to the financial statements

© 2025 KPMG, a New Zealand Partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organization of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited,
a private English company limited by guarantee. All rights reserved.


Document classification: KPMG Public

Independent Auditor’s Report

To the shareholders of Vector Limited

Report on the audit of the consolidated financial statements

Opinion

We have audited the accompanying consolidated

financial statements which comprise:

­ the consolidated balance sheet as at 30 June

2025;

­ the consolidated statements of profit or loss, other

comprehensive income, changes in equity and

cash flows for the year then ended; and

­ notes, including material accounting policy

information and other explanatory information.

In our opinion, the accompanying Company and

banking group consolidated financial statements

of Vector Limited (the Company) and its

subsidiaries (the Group) on pages 58 to 103

presents fairly in all material respects:

­ the Group’s financial position as at 30 June

2025 and its financial performance and cash

flows for the year ended on that date;

­ in accordance with New Zealand

Equivalents to International Financial

Reporting Standards (NZ IFRS) issued by

the New Zealand Accounting Standards

Board and the International Financial

Reporting Standards issued by the

International Accounting Standards Board.


Basis for opinion

We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (New Zealand) (ISAs (NZ)). We

believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.

We are independent of Vector Limited in accordance with Professional and Ethical Standard 1 International Code

of Ethics for Assurance Practitioners (Including International Independence Standards) (New Zealand) issued by

the New Zealand Auditing and Assurance Standards Board and the International Ethics Standards Board for

Accountants’ International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (including International Independence

Standards) (IESBA Code), as applicable to audits of financial statements of public interest entities. We have also

fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with Professional and Ethical Standard 1 and the IESBA

Code.

Our responsibilities under ISAs (NZ) are further described in the Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the

consolidated financial statements section of our report.

Our firm has provided other services to the Group in relation to the review of interim financial statements,

regulatory assurance over climate related disclosures and other assurance and agreed upon procedures

engagements, compliance services in relation to R&D tax credits and providing a whistleblower hotline. Subject

to certain restrictions, partners and employees of our firm may also deal with the Group on normal terms within

the ordinary course of trading activities of the business of the Group. These matters have not impaired our

independence as auditor of the Group. The firm has no other relationship with, or interest in, the Group.

© 2025 KPMG, a New Zealand Partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organization of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited,

a private English company limited by guarantee. All rights reserved.


Document classification:KPMG Public

Independent Auditor’s Report

To the shareholders of Vector Limited

Report on the audit of the consolidated financial statements

Opinion

We have audited the accompanying consolidated

financial statements which comprise:

­ the consolidatedbalance sheet as at 30 June

2025;

­ the consolidatedstatements of profit or loss, other

comprehensive income, changes in equity and

cash flows for the year then ended; and

­ notes, including material accounting policy

information and other explanatory information.

In our opinion, the accompanying Company and

banking group consolidated financial statements

of Vector Limited (the Company) and its

subsidiaries (the Group) on pages 58 to 103

presents fairlyin all material respects:

­ the Group’s financial position as at 30 June

2025 and its financial performance and cash

flows for the year ended on that date;

­ in accordance with New Zealand

Equivalents to International Financial

Reporting Standards(NZ IFRS) issued by

the New Zealand Accounting Standards

Board and the International Financial

Reporting Standards issued by the

International Accounting Standards Board.


Basis for opinion

We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (New Zealand) (ISAs (NZ)). We

believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.

We are independent of Vector Limited in accordance with Professional and Ethical Standard 1 International Code

of Ethics for Assurance Practitioners (Including International Independence Standards) (New Zealand) issued by

the New Zealand Auditing and Assurance Standards Board and the International Ethics Standards Board for

Accountants’ International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (including International Independence

Standards) (IESBA Code), as applicable to audits of financial statements of public interest entities. We have also

fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with Professional and Ethical Standard 1 and the IESBA

Code.

Our responsibilities under ISAs (NZ) are further described in the Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the

consolidated financial statements section of our report.

Our firm has provided other services to the Group in relation to the review of interim financial statements,

regulatory assurance over climate related disclosures and other assurance and agreed upon procedures

engagements, compliance services in relation to R&D tax credits and providing a whistleblower hotline. Subject

to certain restrictions, partners and employees of our firm may also deal with theGroup on normal terms within

the ordinary course of trading activities of the business of the Group. These matters have not impaired our

independence as auditor of theGroup. The firm has no other relationship with, or interest in, theGroup.

© 2024 KPMG, a New Zealand Partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organization of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a

private English company limited by guarantee. All rights reserved.

Document classification: KPMG Public

Independent Auditor’s Report

To the shareholdersof Vector Limited

Report on the audit of theconsolidatedfinancial statements

Opinion

In our opinion, the accompanying consolidatedfinancial

statements of Vector Limited (the Company) and its

subsidiaries (the Group) on pages 57 to 101 present

fairlyin all material respects:

-the Group’s financial position as at 30 June

2024 and its financial performance and cash

flows for the yearended on that date;and

-In accordance withNew Zealand Equivalents to

International Financial Reporting Standards(NZ

IFRS) issued by the New Zealand Accounting

Standards Board and the International Financial

Reporting Standards issued by the International

Accounting Standards Board.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated

financial statements which comprise:

- the consolidatedbalance sheet as at 30 June

2024;

-the consolidatedprofit or loss, statements of

other comprehensive income, changes in

equity and cash flows for the year then ended;

-notes, includingmaterial accounting policy

information and other explanatory information

Basis for opinion

W

e conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (New Zealand) (ISAs (NZ)). We

believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.

We are independent of Vector Limited in accordance with Professional and Ethical Standard 1 International Code

of Ethics for Assurance Practitioners (Including International Independence Standards) (New Zealand) issued by

the New Zealand Auditing and Assurance Standards Board and the International Ethics Standards Board for

Accountants’ International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (including International Independence

Standards) (IESBA Code), and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these

requirements and the IESBA Code.

Our responsibilities under ISAs (NZ) are further described in the Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the

consolidatedfinancial statements section of our report.

Our firm has provided other services to the Group in relation to the regulatory assurance services, other

assurance services, pre-assurance on climate related disclosures and compliance services in relation to R&D tax

credits. Subject to certain restrictions, partners and employees of our firm may also deal with theGroup on

normal terms within the ordinary course of trading activities of the business of the Group. These matters have not

impaired our independence as auditor of theGroup. The firm has no other relationship with, or interest in, the

Group.

Materiality

The scope of our audit was influenced by our application of materiality. Materiality helped us to determine the

nature, timing and extent of our audit procedures and to evaluate the effect of misstatements, both individually

and on theconsolidated financial statements as a whole. The materiality for the consolidated financial statements

as a whole was set at $11.3mdetermined with reference to a benchmark of the Group’s profit before tax. We

chose the benchmark because, in our view, this is a key measure of the Group’s performance.

Vector Annual Report 2025104

Materiality
The scope of our audit was influenced by our application of materiality. Materiality helped us to determine the

nature, timing and extent of our audit procedures and to evaluate the effect of misstatements, both individually

and on the consolidated financial statements as a whole. The materiality for the consolidated financial statements

as a whole was set at $12 million determined with reference to a benchmark of the Group’s profit before tax. We

chose the benchmark because, in our view, this is a key measure of the Group’s performance.

Key audit matters

Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgement, were of most significance in our audit of

the consolidated financial statements in the current period. We summarise below those matters and our key audit

procedures to address those matters in order that the shareholders as a body may better understand the process

by which we arrived at our audit opinion.

Our procedures were undertaken in the context of and solely for the purpose of our audit opinion on the

consolidated financial statements as a whole and we do not express discrete opinions on separate elements of

the consolidated financial statements.

The key audit matter How the matter was addressed in

our audit

Capitalisation and asset lives (Property, plant and equipment of $4,807.9 million, Software of $58.2

million, with additions during the year of $476.2 million).

Refer to Notes 14 and 15 of the financial statements.

Capitalisation of costs and useful lives assigned to

these assets are a key audit matter due to the

significance of property, plant and equipment and

software to the group’s business, and due to the

judgement involved in determining the carrying

value of these assets, principally:

•the decision to capitalise or expense costs

relating to the electricity and gas distributi

on

net

works. This decision depends on whether

the expenditure is considered to enhance th

e

net

work (and is therefore capital), or t

o

m

aintain the current operating capability of t

he

net

work (and is therefore an expense). Ther

e

i

s also judgement when estimating the extent

of recovering internal salary costs, particularly

within digital projects;

and

•the estimation of the useful life of the asset

once the costs are capitalised. Estimated lives

range between 2 and 70 years, resulting from

the diversity of property, plant and equipment

and software assets across a portfolio of

businesses. There is also judgement when

estimating asset lives due to the uncertainty of

the impact of technological change.

Our audit procedures in this area included, among

others:

•examining the operating effectiveness of controls

related to the approval of capital projects;

•assessing the nature of capitalised costs by

checking a sample of costs to invoice to determine

whether the description of the expenditure met t

he

c

apitalisation criteria in the relevant accounti

ng

s

tandards;

•assessing the useful lives stated in the accounting

pol

icies of the group by comparing to industry

benchmarks and our knowledge of the business and

its operations; and

•assessing whether the useful lives of each individual

asset capitalised in the current period was within the

stated policies.

We found no material errors in the nature and amount

capitalised in the period and that the estimated useful

lives of assets were within an acceptable range when

compared to those used in the industry.

105

Independent Auditor’s Report






3


The key audit matter How the matter was addressed in

our audit

Impairment assessment of the goodwill allocated to the Electricity distribution and Gas distribution

cash generating units ($953.1 million).

Refer to Note 14 of the financial statements.

We considered the impairment assessment of the

Electricity distribution and Gas distribution cash

generating units to be a key audit matter due to the

significance of goodwill ($953.1 million) to the

financial position of the group, the recognition of an

impairment of $37 million in connection with the

gas distribution cash generating unit and the

significant judgement used to estimate future

pricing of the regulated revenue streams beyond

the timeframe of the current Commerce

Commission regulatory price paths.

Our audit procedures in this area included, among

others:

• assessing whether the methodology adopted in the

discounted cash flow models was consistent with

accepted valuation approaches of NZ IAS 36

Impairment of Assets and within the energy industry;

• evaluating the significant future cash flow

assumptions by comparing to historical trends,

budgets and where applicable, Asset Management

Plans, and regulatory pricing models;

• comparing the discount rates applied to the

estimated future cash flows and the terminal growth

rates to relevant benchmarks using our own

valuation specialists;

• challenging the above assumptions and judgements

by performing sensitivity analysis, considering a

range of likely outcomes based on various

scenarios;

• calculating the regulated asset base (‘RAB’) multiple

implied by valuation of the respective cash

generating unit and comparing this to the range of

RAB multiples observed in the marketplace; and

• comparing the group’s net assets as at 30 June

2025 to its market capitalisation at 30 June 2025.

We found the methodology to be consistent with industry

norms, specifically:

• the discount and terminal growth rates were in an

acceptable industry range;

• future cash flow assumptions were supported by

comparison to the sources we considered above;

and

• the overall comparison of the group’s net assets to

market capitalisation did not indicate an impairment.








Vector Annual Report 2025106






4


Other information

The directors, on behalf of the Group, are responsible for the other information. The other information comprises

information included in the entity’s Annual Report, Climate Related Disclosures Report and Greenhouse Gas

Emissions Inventory Report, but does not include the financial statements and our auditor’s report thereon.

Our opinion on the consolidated financial statements does not cover any other information and we do not

express any form of assurance conclusion thereon.

In connection with our audit of the consolidated financial statements our responsibility is to read the other

information and in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the

consolidated financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit or otherwise appears materially

misstated.

If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude there is a material misstatement of this other information,

we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report in this regard.


Use of this independent auditor’s report

This independent auditor’s report is made solely to the shareholders. Our audit work has been undertaken so

that we might state to the shareholders those matters we are required to state to them in the independent

auditor’s report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, none of KPMG, any entities

directly or indirectly controlled by KPMG, or any of their respective members or employees, accept or assume

any responsibility and deny all liability to anyone other than the shareholders for our audit work, this independent

auditor’s report, or any of the opinions we have formed.


Responsibilities of directors for the consolidated financial

statements

The directors, on behalf of the Group, are responsible for:

— the preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with NZ

IFRS issued by the New Zealand Accounting Standards Board and the International Financial Reporting

Standards issued by the International Accounting Standards Board;

— implementing the necessary internal control to enable the preparation of a consolidated set of financial

statements that is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; and

— assessing the ability of the Group to continue as a going concern. This includes disclosing, as

applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless

they either intend to liquidate or to cease operations or have no realistic alternative but to do so.






107

Independent Auditor’s Report






5


Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the consolidated

financial statements

Our objective is:

— to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from

material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; and

— to issue an independent auditor’s report that includes our opinion.

Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but it is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in

accordance with ISAs NZ will always detect a material misstatement when it exists.

Misstatements can arise from fraud or error. They are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they

could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of the

consolidated financial statements.

A further description of our responsibilities for the audit of the consolidated financial statements is located at the

External Reporting Board (XRB) website at:

https://www.xrb.govt.nz/standards/assurance-standards/auditors-responsibilities/audit-report-1 -1/

This description forms part of our independent auditor’s report.

The engagement partner on the audit resulting in this independent auditor’s report is Matthew Diprose.


For and on behalf of:




KPMG

Auckland

22 August 2025



Vector Annual Report 2025108

Statutory
Information

109

Statutory information
Interests register

Each company in the group is required to maintain an interests register in which the particulars of certain transactions

and matters involving the directors must be recorded. The interests registers for Vector Limited and its subsidiaries are

available for inspection at their registered offices.

Particulars of entries in the interests registers as at 30 June 2025 are set out in this Statutory Information section.

Information used by directors

During the financial year there were no notices from directors of Vector Limited, or any subsidiary, requesting to use

information received in their capacity as a director which would not otherwise have been available to them.

Indemnification and insurance of directors and officers

As permitted by the constitution and the Companies Act 1993, Vector Limited has indemnified its directors, and those

directors who are directors of subsidiaries against potential liabilities and costs they may incur for acts or omissions

in their capacity as directors. In addition, Vector Limited has indemnified certain senior employees against potential

liabilities and costs they may incur for acts or omissions in their capacity as employees of Vector Limited, or directors

of Vector subsidiaries or associates.

During the financial year, Vector Limited paid insurance premiums in respect of directors and certain senior employees’

liability insurance which covers risks normally covered by such policies arising out of acts or omissions of directors and

employees in their capacity as such. Insurance is not provided for criminal liability or liability or costs in respect of which

an indemnity is prohibited by law.

Donations

Vector Limited made donations of $10,000 during the year ended 30 June 2025. Subsidiaries of Vector Limited made

donations of $23,000 during the year ended 30 June 2025. Vector does not make political donations, these amounts

represent donations to charitable organisations.

Credit rating

At 30 June 2025 Vector Limited had a Standard & Poor’s credit rating of BBB+.

NZX regulation waivers and rulings

Vector has not relied on any new waivers or rulings in the year ended 30 June 2025. Vector continues to rely on waivers

and rulings granted by NZ RegCo on 30 June 2020 relating to Vector’s special relationship with Entrust available to

review at https://www.nzx.com/companies/VCT/documents. Vector has a non-standard designation as a result of these

waivers, and provisions in Vector’s constitution reflecting Vector’s relationship with Entrust.

Exercise of NZX powers

NZX did not exercise any of its powers set out in Listing Rule 9.9.3 (relating to powers to cancel, suspend or censure

an issuer) with respect to Vector Limited.

Trustees of Entrust

During the year ended 30 June 2025 Vector Limited made payments to A Bell and P Hutchison, trustees of

Entrust (Vector Limited’s majority shareholder), totalling $254,000 in respect of their roles as directors on the

Vector Limited board

Subsidiaries and associates

A list of each of the Company’s subsidiaries and associates is contained on pages 82 and 83.

Vector Annual Report 2025110

Statutory Information

Directors
The following directors of Vector Limited and current group companies held office as at 30 June 2025 or resigned (R) as a

director during the year ended 30 June 2025. Directors marked (A) were appointed during the year.

PARENTDIRECTORS

Vector LimitedA Bell, V Busby (A), B Hassall (R), P Hutchison, D McKay, P Rebstock,

B Turner, A Urlwin

All of the above directors in office as at 30 June 2025 are independent directors, except for A Bell and P Hutchison who are

trustees of Entrust (Vector Limited’s majority shareholder).

SUBSIDIARIESDIRECTORS

Cristal Air International LimitedJ Hollingworth, S Mackenzie

E-Co Products Group LimitedJ Hollingworth, S Mackenzie

Equalise Cyber Security LimitedJ Hollingworth, S Mackenzie

Vector Advanced Metering Assets (Australia) LimitedJ Hollingworth, S Mackenzie

Vector Auckland Property LimitedJ Hollingworth, S Mackenzie

Vector Communications LimitedJ Hollingworth, S Mackenzie

Vector Energy Solutions (Australia) Pty LimitedJ Hollingworth, S Mackenzie, J Sheridan (R), D Van Gerrevink (A)

Vector Energy Solutions LimitedJ Hollingworth, S Mackenzie

Vector ESPS Trustee LimitedJ Hollingworth, S Mackenzie

Vector Gas Trading LimitedJ Hollingworth, S Mackenzie

Vector Investment Holdings LimitedJ Hollingworth, S Mackenzie

Vector MeterCo LimitedJ Hollingworth, S Mackenzie

Vector Northern Property LimitedJ Hollingworth, S Mackenzie

Vector SPV No. 1 LimitedJ Hollingworth, S Mackenzie

Vector SPV No.2 LimitedJ Hollingworth, S Mackenzie

Vector Technology Solutions LimitedJ Hollingworth, S Mackenzie

Vector Technology Solutions Holdings USA LLCVector Technology Solutions Limited is the manager

VTS USA LLCVector Technology Solutions Limited is the manager

ASSOCIATESDIRECTORS

Bluecurrent Holdings NZ LimitedM Angelini, S Clarke, S Farrier, A Hill, S Mackenzie, P Mulholland,

P Rebstock, M Tume

Bluecurrent Holdings (Australia) Pty LimitedA Andriopolous (R), M Angelini, S Clarke, S Farrier, A Hill, S Mackenzie,

P Mulholland, P Rebstock, M Tume

111

Statutory Information

Directors continued
Directors’ remuneration and value of other benefits received from Vector Limited for the year ended 30 June 2025 is included

in the remuneration report on page 43. Directors’ remuneration and value of other benefits received from current group

companies for the year ended 30 June 2025:

Directors of subsidiaries

PAID BY

PARENT

$

PAID BY

SUBSIDIARIES

$

B Behdin–2,917*

E Bilitzki–2,917*

S Bridge–2,917

N Hannan–2,917

G O’Brien–2,917

R Sharp–2,917*

P Thorley–2,917*

M Trigg–32,083

–52,502

* Directors’ fees relating to any Vector Limited employee are paid to the company. Note that S Bridge, P Goodeve, N Hannan, G O’Brien and M Trigg are not Vector employees.

This table lists directors or former directors of Liquigas Limited. Vector sold its shareholding of Liquigas Limited on 31 January

2025.

Directors of Vector Limited

Entries in the interests register of Vector Limited as at 30 June 2025 that are not set out elsewhere in this annual report:

DIRECTORENTITYPOSITION

A BellEntrustTrus te e

V BusbyEnergy One Limited (ASX:EOL)Shareholder

Energy Queensland LimitedDirector

Netlogix Australia Pty LimitedChair

Netlogix Group Holdings LimitedDirector

Reardon Capital Pty LimitedDirector

Scheme Financial Vehicle Limited (SFV)Chair

P HutchisonBeenz LimitedDirector and shareholder

Beenz (USA) LimitedShareholder

EntrustTrus te e

Franklin Medical Properties LimitedDirector and shareholder

Geneva Finance LimitedShareholder

Helena Bay Honey New Zealand LimitedDirector and shareholder

Helena Bay Honey Northland NZ LimitedDirector and shareholder

Helena Bay Honey NZ Partnership LimitedDirector and shareholder

Helena Health New Zealand LimitedDirector and shareholder

Paul Charles Investments LimitedDirector and shareholder

PPB Properties LimitedDirector and shareholder

Pukekohe Cinemas LimitedDirector and shareholder

South Pacific Star Cinemas Investments LimitedDirector and shareholder

D McKayContact Energy LimitedShareholder

Delegat Group LimitedDirector

IAG New Zealand LimitedDirector

IAG (NZ) Holdings LimitedDirector

Wymac Consulting LimitedDirector and shareholder

Vector Annual Report 2025112

Statutory Information

DIRECTORENTITYPOSITION
P RebstockAIA New Zealand Limited Deputy Chair

Arc Innovations LimitedDirector

Auckland One Rail LimitedDirector

Bluecurrent (Australia) Pty LimitedDirector

Bluecurrent Assets (Australia) Pty LimitedDirector

Bluecurrent Assets NZ LimitedDirector

Bluecurrent Holdings (Australia) Pty LimitedDirector

Bluecurrent Holdings NZ LimitedDirector

Bluecurrent No.2 (Australia) Pty LimitedDirector

Bluecurrent No.2 NZ LimitedDirector

Bluecurrent No.3 (Australia) Pty LimitedDirector

Bluecurrent No.3 NZ LimitedDirector

Bluecurrent NZ LimitedDirector

Bluecurrent Services NZ LimitedDirector

Freightlink LimitedDirector

National Hauora Coalition LimitedChair

Ngāti Whātua Ōrākei Whai Maia LimitedChair

NZ Healthcare Investments LimitedChair

NZX LimitedDeputy Chair

On Being Bold LimitedDirector and shareholder

Sealink New Zealand LimitedDirector

Sealink Pine Harbour LimitedDirector

Sealink Travel Group New Zealand LimitedDirector

B TurnerCommodity Insights Digest (Bayes Business School, UK)Editorial Board Member

Fonterra Co-Operative Group LimitedSenior Advisor

GlobalDairyTrade Holdings LimitedDirector

The Arapaho Springs TrustTrus te e

The Arapaho Springs Investment TrustTrus te e

A UrlwinCity Rail Link LimitedDirector

Clifton Creek LimitedDirector and shareholder

Infratil LimitedDirector

Precinct Properties New Zealand LimitedChair

Urlwin Associates LimitedDirector and shareholder

Ventia Services Group LimitedDirector

The entities listed above against each director may transact with Vector Limited and its subsidiaries in the normal course of

business. Auckland based directors (A Bell, P Hutchison, D McKay, P Rebstock, and B Turner) are Vector Limited residential

electricity customers.

Directors of subsidiaries

There are no entries in the interests register of subsidiaries up to 30 June 2025 that are not set out elsewhere in this annual

report.

Directors continued

Directors of Vector Limited continued

113

Statutory Information

Bondholder statistics
NZDX debt securities distribution as at 30 June 2025:

6.23% Capital bonds

RANGE

NUMBER OF

BONDHOLDERS

PERCENTAGE OF

BONDHOLDERS

NUMBER OF

SECURITIES HELD

PERCENTAGE OF

SECURITIES HELD

5,000 – 9,99944815.85%2,430,0000.79%

10,000 – 49,9991,76262.35%36,446,00011.86%

50,000 – 99,99939814.08%22,974,0007.48%

100,000 – 499,9991896.69%29,302,0009.54%

500,000 – 999,99990.32%5,523,0001.80%

1,000,000 plus200.71%210,530,00068.53%

2,826100.00%307,205,000100.00%

The following current directors of the parent are holders (either beneficially or non-beneficially) of Vector Limited 6.23% capital

bonds as at 30 June 2025:

DIRECTOR

NUMBER OF

BONDS

A Urlwin (as a shareholder of Clifton Creek Limited)33,000

Twenty largest registered 6.23% capital bond holders as at 30 June 2025:

BOND HOLDERBONDS HELD

PERCENTAGE OF

BONDS HELD

Custodial Services Limited <A/C 4>68,206,00022.20%

Forsyth Barr Custodians Limited <1-CUSTODY>48,842,00015.90%

JBWERE (NZ) Nominees Limited <NZ RESIDENT A/C>24,834,0008.08%

FNZ Custodians Limited19,608,0006.38%

Masfen Securities Limited5,980,0001.95%

HSBC Nominees (New Zealand) Limited – NZCSD <HKBN90>5,968,0001.94%

NZX WT Nominees Limited <CASH ACCOUNT>4,682,0001.52%

Forsyth Barr Custodians Limited <ACCOUNT 1 E>4,464,0001.45%

Forsyth Barr Custodians Limited <A/C 1 NRLAIL>4,348,0001.42%

CML Shares Limited4,200,0001.37%

Investment Custodial Services Limited <A/C C>3,281,0001.07%

PIN Twenty Limited <KINTYRE A/C>2,622,0000.85%

Catherine Ann Tuck <PUKETIHI A/C>2,300,0000.75%

Best Farm Limited2,000,0000.65%

Fletcher Building Educational Fund Limited2,000,0000.65%

ANZ Custodial Services New Zealand Limited – NZCSD <PBNK90>1,791,0000.58%

Public Trust Class 10 Nominees Limited – NZCSD1,690,0000.55%

Woolf Fisher Trust Incorporated1,500,0000.49%

KPS Society Limited1,200,0000.39%

FNZ Custodians Limited <DTA NON RESIDENT A/C>1,014,0000.33%

210,530,00068.52%

Vector Annual Report 2025114

Statutory Information

Bondholder statistics continued
3.69% Senior retail bonds

RANGE

NUMBER OF

BONDHOLDERS

PERCENTAGE OF

BONDHOLDERS

NUMBER OF

SECURITIES HELD

PERCENTAGE OF

SECURITIES HELD

5,000 – 9,999316.65%173,0000.08%

10,000 – 49,99928761.59%6,401,0002.84%

50,000 – 99,9996714.38%3,745,0001.66%

100,000 – 499,9994710.09%8,636,0003.84%

500,000 – 999,999143.00%8,686,0003.86%

1,000,000 plus204.29%197,359,00087.72%

466100.00%225,000,000100.00%

Twenty largest registered 3.69% senior retail bond holders as at 30 June 2025:

BOND HOLDERBONDS HELD

PERCENTAGE OF

BONDS HELD

Custodial Services Limited <A/C 4>72,189,00032.08%

FNZ Custodians Limited26,286,00011.68%

HSBC Nominees (New Zealand) Limited – NZCSD <HKBN90>24,103,00010.71%

Forsyth Barr Custodians Limited <1-CUSTODY>18,453,0008.20%

JBWERE (NZ) Nominees Limited <NZ RESIDENT A/C>17,761,0007.89%

BNP Paribas Nominees (Nz) Limited – NZCSD <BPSS40>5,440,0002.42%

ANZ Wholesale NZ Fixed Interest Fund – NZCSD4,332,0001.93%

Forsyth Barr Custodians Limited <ACCOUNT 1 E>3,750,0001.67%

Investment Custodial Services Limited <A/C C>3,551,0001.58%

Citibank Nominees (New Zealand) Limited – NZCSD <CNOM90>3,359,0001.49%

Forsyth Barr Custodians Limited <A/C 1 NRLAIL>2,119,0000.94%

NZX WT Nominees Limited <CASH ACCOUNT>2,095,0000.93%

Dunedin City Council2,000,0000.89%

JBWERE (NZ) Nominees Limited <A/C 31933>2,000,0000.89%

HSBC Nominees (New Zealand) Limited A/C State Street – NZCSD <HKBN45>1,958,0000.87%

Mint Nominees Limited – NZCSD <NZP440>1,903,0000.85%

Pin Twenty Limited <KINTYRE A/C>1,875,0000.83%

FNZ Custodians Limited <DTA NON RESIDENT A/C>1,581,0000.70%

Custodial Services Limited <A/C 12>1,328,0000.59%

Forsyth Barr Custodians Limited <ACCOUNT 1 NRL>1,276,0000.57%

197,359,00087.71%

115

Statutory Information

Shareholder statistics
Twenty largest registered shareholders as at 30 June 2025:

SHAREHOLDER

ORDINARY

SHARES HELD

PERCENTAGE

OF ORDINARY

SHARES HELD

Entrust751,000,00075.10%

Custodial Services Limited <A/C 4>35,545,2863.55%

ANZ Wholesale Australasian Share Fund – NZCSD <PNAS90>16,813,5071.68%

Generate KiwiSaver Public Trust Nominees Limited <NZCSD> <NZP T4 4>13,508,4291.35%

HSBC Nominees (New Zealand) Limited – NZCSD <HKBN90>11,739,2801.17%

BNP Paribas Nominees (NZ) Limited – NZCSD <BPSS40>10,723,7601.07%

Accident Compensation Corporation – NZCSD <ACCI40>8,643,5780.86%

FNZ Custodians Limited8,346,9730.83%

CITIBANK Nominees (New Zealand) Limited – NZCSD <CNOM90>7,887,4720.79%

JPMorgan Chase Bank NA NZ Branch-Segregated Clients ACCT – NZCSD <CHAM24>7,553,6620.76%

Forsyth Barr Custodians Limited <1-CUSTODY>6,001,7880.60%

New Zealand Depository Nominee Limited <A/C 1 CASH ACCOUNT>5,727,0510.57%

JBWere (NZ) Nominees Limited <NZ RESIDENT A/C>5,485,5910.55%

Tea Custodians Limited Client Property Trust Account – NZC SD <T E AC4 0 >4,951,6770.50%

HSBC Nominees (New Zealand) Limited A/C State Street – NZCSD <HKBN45>3,432,8610.34%

Simplicity Nominees Limited – NZCSD3,143,5980.31%

ANZ Custodial Services New Zealand Limited – NZCSD <PBNK90>1,894,8510.19%

Public Trust – NZCSD <THE ASPIRING FUND>1,719,8460.17%

FNZ Custodians Limited <DTA NON RESIDENT A/C>1,265,1060.13%

ANZ Wholesale NZ Share Fund – NZCSD <PNSF90>1,137,7270.11%

906,522,04390.63%

Substantial product holders as at 30 June 2025:

SHAREHOLDER

NUMBER OF

RELEVANT

INTEREST VOTING

PRODUCTS HELD

PERCENTAGE

OF VOTING

PRODUCTS HELD

Entrust 751,000,00075.10%

Alastair Bell, Paul Hutchison, Rachel Langton, Denise Lee and Angus Ogilvie are the registered holders of the shares held by

Entrust.

Vector Annual Report 2025116

Statutory Information

Shareholder statistics continued
As at 30 June 2025, voting products issued by Vector Limited totalled 1,000,000,000 ordinary shares.

Ordinary shares distribution as at 30 June 2025

RANGE

NUMBER OF

SHAREHOLDERS

PERCENTAGE OF

SHAREHOLDERS

NUMBER OF

SHARES HELD

PERCENTAGE OF

SHARES HELD

1 – 4995,77922.72%1,779,8960.18%

500 – 9992,87111.29%2,222,4760.22%

1,000 – 4,99912,83850.47%22,828,3252.28%

5,000 – 9,9991,9497.66%12,986,7691.30%

10,000 – 49,9991,7987.07%32,007,8303.20%

50,000 – 99,9991220.48%7,723,2330.77%

100,000 plus780.31%920,451,47192.05%

25,435100.00%1,000,000,000100.00%

Analysis of shareholders as at 30 June 2025:

SHAREHOLDER TYPE

NUMBER OF

SHAREHOLDERS

PERCENTAGE OF

SHAREHOLDERS

NUMBER OF

SHARES HELD

PERCENTAGE OF

SHARES HELD

Entrust10.00%751,000,00075.10%

Companies8203.22%14,835,3781.49%

Individual Holders14,26456.08%43,132,2654.31%

Joint6,89027.09%29,039,6992.90%

Nominee Companies2641.04%156,911,00515.69%

Other3,19612.57%5,081,6530.51%

25,435100.00%1,000,000,000100.00%

Alastair Bell, Paul Hutchison, Rachel Langton, Denise Lee and Angus Ogilvie are the registered holders of the 751,000,000

ordinary shares held by Entrust. Alastair Bell and Paul Hutchison are directors of Vector Limited.

The following disclosures are made pursuant to section 148 of the Companies Act 1993, in relation to dealings during the year

ended 30 June 2025 by directors of Vector Limited in the ordinary shares of Vector Limited:

There were no acquisitions or disposals of relevant interests.

117

Statutory Information

Financial calendar
2025

Final dividend paid 17 September

Annual meeting 30 September

2026

First quarter operating statistics October

Second quarter operating statistics January

Half year result and interim report February

Interim dividend* April

Third quarter operating statistics April

Fourth quarter operating statistics July

Full year result and annual report August

Final dividend* September

* Dividends are subject to Board determination.

Investor information

Ordinary shares in Vector Limited are listed and quoted on the New Zealand Stock Market (NZSX) under the company code VCT.

Vector also has capital bonds and unsubordinated fixed rate bonds listed and quoted on the New Zealand Debt Market (NZDX).

Current information about Vector’s trading performance for its shares and bonds can be obtained on the NZX website at

www.nzx.com. Further information about Vector is available on our website www.vector.co.nz.

Directory

Registered office

Vector Limited

110 Carlton Gore Road

Newmarket

Auckland 1023

New Zealand

Telephone 64-9-978 7788

Facsimile 64-9-978 7799

www.vector.co.nz

Postal address

PO Box 99882

Newmarket

Auckland 1149

New Zealand

Investor enquiries

Telephone 64-9-978 7735

Email: investor@vector.co.nz

This annual report is dated

22 August 2025 and signed

on behalf of the Board by:

Doug McKay Anne Urlwin

Chair Chair, audit committee

insight

creative.co.nz


VEC266

118

Statutory Information

Vector Annual Report 2025

VECTOR.CO.NZ

---

Financial and
Operational Results

FULL YEAR ENDING 30 JUNE 2025

Presentation Date: 25 August 2025

Disclaimer
This presentation contains forward-looking statements.

Forward-looking statements often include words such as “anticipates”, “estimates”, “expects”,

“intends”, “plans”, “believes” and similar words in connection with discussions of future operating

or financial performance.

The forward-looking statements are based on management's and directors’ current expectations

and assumptions regarding Vector’s businesses and performance, the economy and other future

conditions, circumstances and results.

As with any projection or forecast, forward-looking statements are inherently susceptible to

uncertainty and changes in circumstances. Vector’s actual results may vary materially from those

expressed or implied in its forward-looking statements.

2

Agenda
3

•Overview of Financial Performance

•Financial Performance

•Segment Performance

•Outlook & Market Commentary

•Q&A

OVERVIEW OF FINANCIAL
PERFORMANCE

4

Variance
excludes

Discontinued

Operations

Overview of financial performance

5

Adjusted EBITDA is not a GAAP measure of profit. For a reconciliation of adjusted EBITDA to EBITDA and net profit refer to the appendix of this presentation.

FY24 refers to Financial Year 24 for the twelve months ending 30 June 2024. FY25 refers to Financial Year 25 for the twelve months ending 30 June 2025.

Revenue

Adjusted

EBITDA

Gross Capital

Expenditure

Operating

Cashflow

NPAT

+9%+16%-6%+16%+105%

Figures shown in

$NZD Millions

Full Year FY25 vs Full Year FY24

Grey bars represent the discontinued operations of Gas Trading

which included Ongas, Liquigas and in prior years also Natural Gas.

The subset of Natural Gas was sold on 1 July 2024 with Ongas and

Liquigas then sold on the 31

st

of January 2025.

Blue bars represent the ongoing continuing operations of Vector.

818

894

345

401

76

155

499

470

445

515

229

79

36

13

15

13

11

3

1,046

973

382

414

91

168

510

473

445

515

FY24FY25FY24FY25FY24FY25FY24FY25FY24FY25

FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE
6

Adjusted EBITDA (from continuing operations) up $56m / 16%
7

FY25 Full Year adjusted EBITDA movement vs prior year ($M)

•With the sale of our gas trading segment, we now have a new segment reporting structure (as reported in the

half year results) of electricity, gas distribution and other.

•Other is a non-reportable segment and includes VTS, HRV, Vector Fibre, Equalise and group eliminations.

•Corporate costs are now allocated out to the revenue generating business units in line with the regulatory

allocation methodology (this was implemented for the half year results also).

345

+57

+2-3

401

FY24ElectricityGas

Distribution

OtherFY25

NPAT from continuing operations are up $79m
8

“Other” includes, share of associates, fair value changes on financial instruments and tax.

FY25 Full Year NPAT from continuing operations movement vs prior year ($M)

76

+56

+15-13

-20

+23

+18155

FY24Adj. EBITDACapital

Contributions

Depreciation

and

Amortisation

Net InterestImpairmentOtherFY25

FY24: -$60m

FY25: -$37m

Variance: +$23m

Lower gross capex and capital contributions
9

•Gross capex decrease of $29m to $470m. Net capex (after deducting contributions) down $44m / 15% to

$260m. Contributions up 8% to $211m, largely attributable to relocation projects such as SH16 Safe road Stage

1 Huapai,and system growth contributions driven by higher incremental capacity

•Year on year electricity replacement capex has decreased by $33m primarily driven by work completed last

year to improve resilience and reliability of network security and to also restore the network post the extreme

weather events in FY23

Note 1. All years adjusted to exclude discontinued operations;

Gross Capital Expenditure ($M)FY25 Full Year Gross Capex movement vs prior year ($M)

Gas D’ and

Other Capex

Electricity

Capex

264

239

219

304

304

260

86

122

152

188

195

211

350

362

370

492

499

470

FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25

Net capexCapital contributions

457

432

42

38

499

+8-33

-3

-1

470

FY24Electricity

Growth

Electricity

Replace-

ment

Gas

Distribution

OtherFY25

Strong Balance Sheet
10

Vector’s Standard and Poor’s credit rating is BBB+ with a stable outlook

Net Economic Debt ($B) and Gearing

Debt Maturity Profile ($M)

Note. Gearing is defined as economic net debt to economic net debt plus adjusted equity. Adjusted equity means total equity adjusted for hedge reserves.

2.92

3.01

3.11

3.16

3.30

3.41

1.93

2.14

2.13

2.23

2.15

56%

56%

57%

57%

58%

59%

33%

36%36%

38%

37%

JunDecJunDecJunDecJunDecJunDecJun

202020212022202320242025

Economic net debt ($B)Gearing

100

475

277

138

574

223

170

307

225

577

977

FY26FY27FY28FY29FY30FY31FY32FY33FY34FY35

Bank FacilitiesUSPP

Wholesale BondsCapital Bonds

Retail Bonds

SEGMENT PERFORMANCE
11

Electricity - adjusted EBITDA up $57m / 19%
12

•Electricity revenue is higher due to price

adjustments reflecting the impact of

high historic inflation, higher pass-

through costs such as transmission and

the DPP4 reset from 1 April;

•Higher opex costs are largely due to

increase in pass-through costs ($15.5m)

which is offset by an increase in

revenue.

•Total net connections continue to grow

with electricity connections up 1.2%

on FY24 to 632,106.

•However, new connections inFY25 have

been 3,411 lower than FY24, reflective of

the broader economic slowdown.

Adjusted EBITDA Movement ($M)

New Connections

000’s

Total Connections

000’s

Note 1. New connections refers to gross new connections. Net connections accounts for disconnections and cancellations which represents the movement in total connections.

11.1

11.0

12.2

15.0

13.5

15.9

16.0

12.5

FY

18

FY

19

FY

20

FY

21

FY

22

FY

23

FY

24

FY

25

563

571

580

591

600

613

624

632

FY

18

FY

19

FY

20

FY

21

FY

22

FY

23

FY

24

FY

25

295

+75-18

352

FY24RevenueOpexFY25

Gas Distribution - adjusted EBITDA up $2m / 4%
13

•Our Gas Distribution business builds and

maintains the gas network within the

wider Auckland region.

•Gas revenue is higher due to price

increases and prior period wash up

partially offset by lower volumes.

Volumes were 8.5% lower compared with

FY24, due to lower demand across all

sectors.

•Opex costs are consistent to prior year.

•Total connections relatively flat at 0.2%

increase but noting the continuing

decline in new connections over the last

five years.

•As mentioned earlier we have recognised

a $37m impairment in FY25. This is

recorded below Adjusted EBITDA.

Adjusted EBITDA Movement ($M)

New Connections

000’s

Total Connections

000’s

Note 1. New connections refers to gross new connections. Net connections accounts for disconnections and cancellations which represents the movement in total connections.

3.2

3.3

3.2

3.8

3.1

2.7

1.9

1.3

FY

18

FY

19

FY

20

FY

21

FY

22

FY

23

FY

24

FY

25

109

112

114

116

118

120

120

121

FY

18

FY

19

FY

20

FY

21

FY

22

FY

23

FY

24

FY

25

45

+2-0

47

FY24RevenueOpexFY25

Investment in Bluecurrent
14

•While this business is making a net loss, it is still cash

generative and performing in line with expectations.

•In FY25 we received $51.8m of distributions in

relation to our 50% shareholding.

Ke y Financials $MFY24FY25Δ

Net Book Value of Investment684606(79)

Financial statement values below at total value unless stated

Revenue29132534

Net profit/(loss) after tax(50)(42)8

Vector's 50% share of Net profit (25)(21)4

Total Assets2,7792,86283

Total Liabilities1,8331,997164

Net Assets946865(81)

OUTLOOK & MARKET COMMENTARY
15

Outlook – FY26
16

•As with the half year we will be providing guidance on adjusted EBITDA, gross capex and

capital contributions.

•For adjusted EBITDA the forecast increase on FY25 is driven primarily by the first full year

of the electricity DPP4 period. The forecast increase in capital spend is linked to expected

customer driven growth and our continued investment in the network.

•For FY26 the guidance range is as follows.

•Adjusted EBITDA: $470m - $490m

•Gross Capex: $520m - $590m

•Capital Contributions: $180m – $230m

7.50
7.75

8.00

8.258.258.258.258.258.25

9.25

12.00

8.00

8.00

8.00

8.00

8.258.25

8.508.508.50

13.00

13.00

5.50

1.75

15.50

15.75

16.00

16.25

16.5016.50

16.7516.75

22.25

24.00

25.00

FY15FY16FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25

InterimFinalSpecial

Final FY25 Dividend

17

•Final dividend of 13.00 cents per share with no

imputation.

•A total dividend for FY25 of 25.00 cents per

share up 1 cent on FY24. This represents an

85% payout of free cashflow post debt finance.

•Dividend record date of 5 September 2025

and payment date of 17 September 2025

Dividend Trend (cents per share)

FY25 D iv id e n d Ca lcu la tion$M

Operating Cashflow515.2

Investing Activities - Capex (cash)(474.9)

Investing Activities - Bluecurrent36.2

Contingent consideration10.8

Lease liabilities payments(8.4)

Fre e Ca sh flow p re D e b t. Fin a n ce7 8. 9

Gross Capex (cash)474.9

Less Capital Contributions (cash)(190.0)

N e t Ca p e x284 . 9

D e b t Fu n d in g @ 7 5% N e t Ca p e x21 3. 7

Fre e Ca sh flow p ost D e b t Fin a n ce29 2. 6

D iv id e n d Pa y ou t250 . 0

% of Fre e Ca sh flow p ost D e b t Fin a n ce85%

Q&A
ANY QUESTIONS?

18

APPENDICES
19

Segment Results – Continuing Operations
20

1. Other is not a reportable segment. Includes VTS, HRV, Vector Fibre, Equalise and inter-segment eliminations,

E le ctricity

Gas Dis tribu tion

Othe r

1

Total

FY24

FY25

Δ

FY24

FY25

Δ

FY24

FY25

Δ

FY24

FY25

Δ

Adju s te d E BI TDA

Revenue excl. Capital

Contributions

687

762

75

+11%

65

67

2.1

+3%

65

64

(1)

-2%

818

894

76

+9%

Operating Expenses

(392)

(410)

(18)

-5%

(20)

(21)

(0.2)

-1%

(60)

(62)

(2)

-3%

(472)

(492)

(20)

-4%

Ad ju ste d E B I TD A

29 5

352

57

+1 9 %

45

47

1.9

+4 %

5

3

(3)

- 54 %

34 5

4 0 1

56

+1 6 %

Cape x

Growth

219

226

8

+3%

12

10

(3)

-21%

14

15

1

+6%

245

251

6

+2%

Replacement

238

205

(33)

-14%

10

9

(1)

-6%

6

5

(2)

-28%

254

219

(35)

-14%

Gross Ca p e x

4 57

4 32

(25)

- 5%

22

19

(3)

- 1 4 %

20

19

(1 )

- 4 %

4 9 9

4 7 0

(29 )

- 6 %

Capital Contributions

(183)

(196)

(13)

-7%

(11)

(13)

(3)

-24%

(1)

(1)

0

+7%

(195)

(211)

(15)

-8%

N e t Ca p e x

27 4

236

(38)

- 1 4 %

11

6

(6 )

- 50 %

19

18

(1 )

- 4 %

30 4

26 0

(4 4 )

- 1 5%

GAAP to Non-GAAP Reconciliation
21

Vector’s standard profit measure prepared under New Zealand GAAP

is net profit. Vector has used non-GAAP profit measures when

discussing financial performance in this document. The directors and

management believe that these measures provide useful

information as they are used internally to evaluate performance of

business units, to establish operational goals and to allocate

resources. For a more comprehensive discussion on the use of non-

GAAP profit measures, please refer to the policy ‘Reporting non-

GAAP profit measures’ available on our website (vector.co.nz).

Non-GAAP profit measures are not prepared in accordance with NZ

IFRS (New Zealand International Financial Reporting Standards) and

are not uniformly defined, therefore the non-GAAP profit measures

reported in this document may not be comparable with those that

other companies report and should not be viewed in isolation or

considered as a substitute for measures reported by Vector in

accordance with NZ IFRS.

Definitions

EBITDA

Earnings before interest, taxation, depreciation, amortisation,

impairment, associates and fair value changes.

Adjusted EBITDA

EBITDA adjusted for third party contributions and significant

one-off gains, losses, revenues and/or expenses.

Extract from the financial statements

G A A P to Non- G A A P reconcilia tionFY24FY25

G roup EBITDA a nd A djusted EBITDA$M$M

Reported net profit for the period (GAAP)-

continuing operations

75.6154.7

A dd ba ck :

Net interest costs52.172.4

Tax (benefit)/expense97.786.5

Depreciation and amortisation218.3231.4

Impairment60.037.0

Associates (share of net (profit)/loss)24.921.1

Fair value changes on financial instruments12.08.5

EBITDA - continuing opera tions54 0.6611.6

A djusted for:

Capital contributions(195.3)(210.5)

A djusted EBITDA - continuing opera tions34 5.34 01.1

A djusted EBITDA - discontinued opera tions36.512.9

Tota l G roup a djusted EBITDA381.84 14 .0

END
22

---

VECTOR LIMITED
Results announcement




Results for announcement to the market

Name of issuer VECTOR LIMITED

Reporting Period 12 MONTHS TO 30 JUNE 2025

Previous Reporting Period 12 MONTHS TO 30 JUNE 2024

Currency NEW ZEALAND DOLLAR

Amount (000s) Percentage change

Revenue from continuing

operations

$1,104,000 8.9%

Total Revenue $1,183,231 (4.7%)

Net profit/(loss) from

continuing operations

$154,767 104.8%

Total net profit/(loss) $167,717 84.2%

Interim/Final Dividend

Amount per Quoted Equity

Security

$0.13000000

Imputed amount per Quoted

Equity Security

$0.00000000

Record Date 5 September 2025

Dividend Payment Date 17 September 2025

Current period Prior comparable period

Net tangible assets per

Quoted Equity Security

$2.54916715 $2.62186907

A brief explanation of any of

the figures above necessary

to enable the figures to be

understood

Refer to accompanying audited financial statements

Authority for this announcement

Name of person


authorised

to make this announcement

JOHN RODGER

Contact person for this

announcement

JOHN RODGER

Contact phone number 021 573640

Contact email address john.rodger@vector.co.nz

Date of release through MAP


25/08/2025


Audited financial statements accompany this announcement.

---

Vector Limited
Distribution Notice




Section 1: Issuer information

Name of issuer VECTOR LIMITED

Financial product name/description ORDINARY SHARES

NZX ticker code VCT

ISIN (If unknown, check on NZX

website)

NZVCTE0001S7

Type of distribution

(Please mark with an X in the

relevant box/es)

Full Year X Quarterly

Half Year Special

DRP applies

Record date 05/09/2025

Ex-Date (one business day before the

Record Date)

04/09/2025

Payment date (and allotment date for

DRP)

17/09/2025

Total monies associated with the

distribution

$130,000,000

Source of distribution (for example,

retained earnings)

RETAINED EARNINGS

Currency NEW ZEALAND DOLLARS

Section 2: Distribution amounts per financial product

Gross distribution $0.13000000

Gross taxable amount $0.13000000

Total cash distribution $0.13000000

Excluded amount (applicable to listed

PIEs)

$0.00000000

Supplementary distribution amount $0.0000000

Section 3: Imputation credits and Resident Withholding Tax

Is the distribution imputed No imputation

If fully or partially imputed, please

state imputation rate as % applied

N/A

Imputation tax credits per financial

product

$0.00000000

Resident Withholding Tax per

financial product

$0.04290000

Section 4: Distribution re-investment plan (if applicable)

NOT APPLICABLE

Section 5: Authority for this announcement
Name of person


authorised to make

this announcement

JOHN RODGER

Contact person for this

announcement

JOHN RODGER

Contact phone number

021 573 640


Contact email address John.rodger@vector.co.nz

Date of release through MAP


25/08/2025

---

CLIMATE-RELATED
DISCLOSURES

2025

About this report
This report is the Vector Limited group’s (Vector or the group)

second mandatory climate statement prepared under

New Zealand’s climate-related disclosures regime. The Vector

group comprises Vector Limited and its subsidiaries. This report

relates to the reporting period 1 July 2024 to 30 June 2025 and

constitutes Vector’s climate statement in respect of that period

under the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013 (FMCA).

Under the FMCA, Vector is required to produce climate

statements that comply with the Aotearoa New Zealand Climate

Standards (NZCS) 1, 2 and 3 issued by the External Reporting

Board (XRB). Accordingly, this document has been prepared in

compliance with NZCS 1, 2 and 3, and covers four thematic areas:

governance, strategy, risk management, and metrics and targets.

The intended primary users of this report are existing and

potential investors, lenders and other creditors.

This report is published as part of a reporting suite, which

also includes our FY2025 greenhouse gas emissions inventory

report, and annual report. All three reports are available at

vector.co.nz/investors/reports.

Given this report relates to the FMCA and NZCS requirements, it

necessarily differs from earlier Vector reports prepared voluntarily

in response to the recommendations of the Taskforce on

Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD).

Unless the context otherwise requires, all references in this report

to we, us, our and Vector should be interpreted to relate to the

Vector group.

This report has been subject to limited assurance* by KPMG;

see appendix 1, and legal review by Chapman Tripp.

Doug McKay

Chair

22 August 2025

Anne Urlwin

Chair, audit committee

22 August 2025

Adoption provisions

Vector has elected to use the following NZCS2 adoption provision

for this FY2025 report. This means the disclosures in this report do

not cover these aspects of the NZCS, though some information is

provided to maintain consistency with Vector’s wider disclosures.

Adoption provision 2: Anticipated financial impacts


* A limited assurance engagement is less in scope than a reasonable assurance engagement,

for a detailed explanation – please see page 38.

2Vector climate-related disclosures 2025

GovernanceStrategyRisksOpportunitiesMetrics

and targets

References

and Appendix

Risk

management

Disclaimer
This report is not earnings guidance or financial advice for

investors. Rather, this report provides a summary of Vector’s

current understanding of, and response to, climate-related

risks and opportunities, and Vector’s current climate-related

governance, risk management, strategy, metrics and targets.

The report reflects Vector’s current understanding as of 22

August 2025, in respect of the 12 months ended 30 June 2025.

Climate-related risk management is an emerging area, and

often uses data and methodologies that are developing and

uncertain. Vector acknowledges that the understanding of

climate risk, and the inputs to assist with this understanding

are constantly evolving.

Vector (including its directors, officers and employees) does not:

‒ Represent that the statements, intentions and/or opinions

contained in this report will not change, or will remain correct

after publishing this report, or

‒ Promise to revise or update those statements and opinions

if events or circumstances change or unanticipated events

happen after publishing this report.

Vector is committed to progressing our response to climate-

related risks and opportunities over time but is constrained

by the novel and developing nature of this subject matter.

In particular, the statements contained in this report involve

assumptions, forecasts and projections about Vector’s present

and future strategies and Vector’s future operating environment.

Such statements are inherently uncertain and subject to

limitations, particularly as inputs, available data and information

are likely to change. As such, Vector cautions reliance on climate-

related forward-looking statements that are necessarily less

reliable than other statements Vector may make in our annual

financial reporting.

The risks and opportunities described in this report, and Vector’s

strategies to achieve our targets, may not eventuate or may

be more or less significant than anticipated. There are many

factors that could cause Vector’s actual results, performance

or achievement of climate-related metrics (including targets)

to differ materially from that described, including economic

and technological viability, climatic, government, customer,

and market factors outside of Vector’s control. Vector

gives no representation, warranty or assurance that actual

outcomes or performance will not materially differ from the

forward-looking statements.

To the maximum extent possible under New Zealand law, Vector

(including its directors, officers and employees) does not accept

and expressly disclaims any liability whatsoever for any direct,

indirect or consequential loss or damage occasioned from any

use or inability to use the information contained in this report,

whether directly or indirectly resulting from inaccuracies, defects,

errors, omissions, out-of-date information or otherwise.

Vector makes no representation as to the accuracy of any

information in this report. We recommend you seek independent

advice before acting or relying on any information in this

report. Vector reserves the right to revise statements made in,

or its strategy or business activities described in, this report,

without notice.

This disclaimer should be read along with other methodologies,

assumptions and uncertainties and limitations contained in this

report, as well as in Vector’s greenhouse gas emissions inventory

report for FY2025.

Unless the context otherwise requires, all references to amounts

in $ in this report are estimates, are in New Zealand dollars and all

references to balances or amounts relate to amounts at the end

of each financial year, namely 30 June.

This report is not an offer document and does not constitute an

offer or invitation or investment recommendation to distribute

or purchase securities, shares, or other interests. Nothing in this

report should be interpreted as capital growth, earnings or any

other legal, financial tax or other advice or guidance. For detailed

information on our financial performance, please refer to our

annual report, available at vector.co.nz/investors/reports.

3

GovernanceStrategyRisksOpportunitiesMetrics

and targets

References

and Appendix

Risk

management

Glossary of terms
Table 1: Definition and glossary of terms

TERMDESCRIPTION

CO₂Carbon dioxide

CRDClimate-related disclosures that comply with Aotearoa New Zealand Climate Standards

Demand-side

orchestration

Where demand is shaped through signals (like dynamic operating envelopes) on distributed energy

resources such as electric cars and hot water load

Distributed energy

resources (DER)

Small-scale energy technologies like solar panels, batteries, and electric vehicles that either generate or

store energy

Distributed systems

operator (DSO)

An emerging concept of how the EDBs operating model may evolve

Dynamic operating

envelope

An emerging concept to maintain electricity network security by placing limits on the amount of electricity

that can be imported from, or exported to, the network at any time

EmissionsGreenhouse gas emissions

EPDEnvironmental product declaration

EVElectric vehicle

FlexibilityThe ability for electrical consumption and injection to be adjusted in response to a price signal, grid frequency

or an active signal from the network operator

FSPField service provider

FYFinancial year – 1 July to 30 June

GHGGreenhouse gas

For the purposes of this report, GHGs are the seven gases listed in the Kyoto Protocol. These are currently:

carbon dioxide (CO₂), methane (CH₄), nitrous oxide (N₂O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons

(PFCs), sulphur hexafluoride (SF₆) and nitrogen trifluoride (NF₃)

GHG ProtocolThe Greenhouse Gas Protocol, a partnership between the World Resources Institute (WRI) and the World

Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). The GHG Protocol develops standards and

guidance, such as the Corporate Standard and the Corporate Value Chain (scope 3) Standard, both used

as guidance for this report

IPCC (AR6)Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Sixth Assessment Report)

LPGLiquefied petroleum gas – a mixture of hydrocarbons, consisting primarily of propane and butane. The

higher density – in contrast to natural gas - allows it to be easily compressed to liquid, and is therefore

largely distributed in bottles

MfEMinistry for the Environment (New Zealand)

Natural gasNatural gas is a naturally occurring mixture of gaseous hydrocarbons, consisting primarily of methane.

The gas is largely distributed through piped infrastructure

NGFSNetwork for greening the financial system - an international network of central banks and supervisory

authorities including the Reserve Bank of New Zealand

(NWA) Non-wires

alternative

Solutions like batteries, demand response, or local generation that reduce the need to build or upgrade

traditional electricity infrastructure such as poles and wires

NZCSNew Zealand Climate Standards

RYRegulatory year: 1 July to 30 June for the gas distribution network; 1 April to 31 March for the electricity business

4Vector climate-related disclosures 2025

GovernanceStrategyRisksOpportunitiesMetrics

and targets

References

and Appendix

Risk

management

TERMDESCRIPTION
SAIDISystem average interruption duration index – average outage duration per customer in a regulatory year.

This metric was developed by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) and used by the

Commerce Commission to regulate electricity distribution networks

– Major event SAIDIA 24 hour period during which the cumulative SAIDI due to unplanned events exceeds a predetermined

major event boundary value

SAIFISystem average interruption frequency index – average number of interruptions per customer in a regulatory

year. This metric was developed by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) and used by the

Commerce Commission to regulate electricity distribution networks

SBTiScience Based Targets initiative

SF₆Sulphur hexafluoride – a gas used to electrically insulate electrical assets. SF₆ has a global warming potential

of 23,500 times that of CO₂

tCO₂eTonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent

Traditional

infrastructure

Physical electrical infrastructure, such as electricity cables, lines, transformers and zone substations. This is in

contrast to non-network solutions like demand-side orchestration

5

GovernanceStrategyRisksOpportunitiesMetrics

and targets

References

and Appendix

Risk

management

About Vector
Vector Limited is NZX listed and 75.1% owned by Entrust, a private community trust which represents 368,000 households and

businesses in central, east and south Auckland (as at 2025 roll date).

A breakdown of Vector’s businesses and investments as of 30 June 2025 is detailed in the table below.

VECTOR BUSINESSDESCRIPTIONREVENUE FY2025

($M)

Electricity distribution

network

Owns and operates the electricity distribution network within the wider

Auckland region. We deliver power to more than 630,000 homes and businesses

via more than 19,000 km of electricity lines (underground and overhead).

960.1

Vector Technology

Solutions

A digital solutions business that takes internally developed products to market. 12.3

HRVProvides energy-efficient solutions across New Zealand covering home

ventilation, home heating, and water filtration systems, as well as electric

vehicle charging.

We announced the sale of HRV after the FY2025 balance date, on 1 August 2025.

35.4

Vector FibreOwns and operates a fibre-optic data network within the wider Auckland region.

Vector Fibre is the subject of a previously announced strategic review.

28.8

Natural gas

distribution network

Owns and operates the gas distribution network within the wider Auckland

region, supplying gas to over 120,000 homes and businesses, through some

4,670 km of mains pipelines, distributing around 12 petajoules (PJ) of gas

per year.

80.5

VECTOR INVESTMENTSDESCRIPTION

Bluecurrent

(50% investment)

Smart metering business providing smart meter data services for electricity and

gas meters throughout New Zealand and Australia. Bluecurrent (formerly known

as Vector Metering) is jointly owned by QIC and Vector.

Changes to Vector’s business portfolio

During FY2025 Vector has:

Ceased trading of our Natural Gas Trading business as of 1 July 2024. This business has been on a wind-down since FY2020, whereby

contracts for natural gas sales were not renewed. This has led to year-on-year reductions in scope 3 emissions related to use of sold gas

product. See our greenhouse gas inventory report [1] for more details. We have also removed references in this climate statement to

climate-related risks related to owning a gas trading business.

Sold our Ongas LPG business and Liquigas investment on 31 January 2025. We have recalculated historic greenhouse gas emissions to

exclude these businesses in accordance with the Greenhouse Gas Protocol. We have also removed references in this climate statement

to climate-related risks with regard to owning LPG businesses.

Sold our 8.1% shareholding in mPrest Systems (2023) Limited on 22 August 2024. The impact of mPrest on Vector’s climate-related

disclosures was below materiality thresholds for the purposes of climate-reporting and therefore excluded from previous analysis.

As a result, sale of this investment has no impact.

6Vector climate-related disclosures 2025

GovernanceStrategyRisksOpportunitiesMetrics

and targets

References

and Appendix

Risk

management

Governance
Vector’s board oversight

Vector Limited’s board of directors is the governance body

ultimately responsible for overseeing Vector’s strategic direction

and its climate-related risks and opportunities. Key climate-

related risks and opportunities are considered as part of Vector’s

16 group-level material risks that are monitored with priority by

Vector’s board risk and assurance committee. These 16 risks were

reviewed four times in FY2025 at the group material risk review.

In FY2025 four of these 16 risks relate to climate change. Refer to

the governance report within Vector’s annual report for a list of

these group material risks [1].

The board’s role in relation to climate-related issues is supported

by two board committees: the audit committee, and the risk

and assurance committee. These committees have delegated

responsibility for managing Vector’s risks, including its climate-

related risks and opportunities.

The audit committee is responsible for oversight of climate-

related reporting. This committee meets to review key

accounting decisions which include those regarding climate-

related scenarios, materiality thresholds, consolidated risks and

opportunities, as well as greenhouse gas emissions quantification

and targets. The audit committee is responsible for reviewing and

recommending the climate-related reports, under the Financial

Markets Conduct Act (FMCA), for board approval. The audit

committee is responsible for ensuring Vector’s climate-related

disclosures comply with the New Zealand Climate Standards

(NZCS) and is responsible for external reviews and assurance in

relation to the climate-related disclosures. KPMG has provided

independent limited assurance* over Vector’s CRD, as detailed

in appendix 1. Vector’s greenhouse gas emissions inventory has

also been subject to limited assurance by KPMG, as outlined in

the greenhouse gas emissions inventory report [1]. Additionally,

our CRD has been legally reviewed by Chapman Tripp.

The risk and assurance committee is responsible for the

oversight of climate-related risks and opportunities as part

of the committee’s oversight of Vector’s enterprise risk

management framework.

These two committees are accountable to the board and each

generally meets at least four times per year. Following each

meeting the relevant committee updates the board in relation

to matters within its scope that significantly affect Vector, as

well as noting decisions of the committee and recommendations

to the board. The board notes or approves the findings or

recommendations of the committees as appropriate.

All committee papers are available to the full board and all

directors have the opportunity to submit questions and/or

attend committee meetings.

Members of Vector’s management attend the meetings of

the committees also, where relevant, to provide a two-way

engagement between the board and management. Charters

of the board and relevant committees can be found in the

governance section of Vector’s website [2].

Board of directors

Governance body ultimately responsible for overseeing Vector’s strategic direction and Vector’s climate-related risks

and opportunities. 7 Members

Board audit committee

Responsible for oversight of climate-related reporting

and key accounting judgments. 3 Members

Board risk and assurance committee

Responsible for the oversight of climate-related risks

and opportunities as part of Vector’s wider enterprise

risk management framework. 3 Members

Executive management

Executive leadership and day-to-day management for ensuring delivery

and development of the strategic objectives. 7 Members

Climate change steering committee

Normally meets monthly with senior management

to provide executive oversight of climate-change-related

topics. 5 Members

Chief public policy and

regulatory officer

Holds executive responsibility for climate-change-

related-risks and opportunities.

Group sustainability

Consults business units to explore climate-

related opportunities, climate adaptation, and

decarbonisation strategy.

Group risk

Responsible for Vector’s group enterprise

risk management framework used to identify and

assess climate-related risks and opportunities.

Group finance

Oversees and analyses financial impacts

of material risks and opportunities,

reports on group-level metrics, and manages

carbon accounting.

Group insights

Conducts scenario analysis, and

models of key risks and opportunities.

Board

Executive

Group

Level

* A limited assurance engagement is less in scope than a reasonable assurance engagement,

for a detailed explanation – please see page 38.

7

StrategyRisks

GovernanceOpportunitiesMetrics

and targets

References

and Appendix

Risk

management

The board ensures that it has the appropriate skills and
competencies by accessing expertise from within the group as

well as external advice where needed. For example, the group

sustainability team has expertise in physical and transitional

climate change trends, while the group insights team has

skills to produce and update transitional scenario models for

the electricity and gas distribution networks. The board also

holds sessions that assist in upskilling the directors on topics

relevant to Vector’s businesses. For example, in FY2025 the

board held a session with the group chief executive and the

chief operating officer of electricity, gas and fibre on the status

of the gas distribution network about uncertain gas volumes

and the incoming regulatory reset. Vector’s board charter

requires that all directors continuously educate themselves

to ensure that they can perform their duties appropriately

and effectively. A summary of key board and board committee

meetings in FY2025 is found in figure 1 below.

Vector’s executive management oversight

The group chief executive is responsible for the day-to-day

leadership and management of Vector’s businesses to ensure

the business strategy and objectives are successfully developed

and delivered. The climate change steering committee is a

subcommittee of the executive, consisting of five members, to

provide executive oversight of climate-related topics including

climate change risks and opportunities. Meetings are typically

held monthly

1

; however, when the agenda consists only of

updates, an email summary may be provided in place of a

formal meeting. The climate change steering committee is

chaired by the chief public policy and regulatory officer, who

holds overall executive responsibility for climate-related risks

and opportunities. The climate change steering committee

reports to the chief executive periodically via the chief public

policy and regulatory officer.

September 2024

Reviewed group material risks

which includes climate-related

risks - this occurs quarterly

November 2024

Update on scenarios, methods,

and judgments influencing

Vector’s FY2025 climate-related

disclosures

Reviewed group material risks

February 2025

Reviewed Vector’s greenhouse

gas commitments

March 2025

Reviewed group material risks

Approved climate-related risks

and opportunities identified

through the business unit risk

review

Approved the electricity asset

management plan which

contains 10-year investment

and maintenance

programmes over the period

1 April 2025 to 31 March 2035

Deep dive on gas distribution

May 2025

Approved short-term incentive

measures for the following

financial year

June 2025

Reviewed key judgments made

during modelling, carbon emission

calculation, and a draft of the

climate-related disclosures

Approved the gas asset

management plan which contains

10-year investment and

maintenance programmes over the

period 1 July 2025 to 30 June 2035

Reviewed group material risks.

Update on Vector Technology

Solutions

August 2025

Recommended climate-related

disclosures to the board

Recommended the greenhouse

gas emissions inventory report to

the board

Approved climate-related

disclosures

Approved greenhouse gas

emissions inventory report

Update on Vector Technology

Solutions

Approved staff incentive target for

the following financial year

B

R

A

Board audit committee

Board risk and assurance committee

Board

B

R

R

R

R

R

B

B

B

A

B

B

B

B

B

B

A

A

A

December 2024

Update on Vector Technology

Solutions - this is related to the

energy platforms opportunity

B

Figure 1: Key board and board committee meetings that occurred during FY2025 related to climate-related risks and opportunities

1. In FY2025 there were eight climate change steering committee meetings

Governance (continued)

8Vector climate-related disclosures 2025

StrategyRisksOpportunitiesMetrics

and targets

References

and Appendix

Risk

management

Governance

Tracking climate-related metrics and targets
The climate-related metrics set out in this report are prepared

by Vector’s management and discussed with the Vector board

audit committee. The metrics are monitored by management

and integrated into performance dashboards. Any noteworthy

changes in Vector’s performance against metrics can be

reported to the group chief executive via a chief public

policy and regulatory officer report. Relevant contents from the

monthly report are then reported to the board in the group

chief executive’s report.

As noted on page 26, Vector’s greenhouse gas emissions

reduction target was developed by thinkstep-anz, and approved

by the board in FY2021. In addition, Vector has targets for

customer outages which are set by Vector’s economic regulator,

the Commerce Commission.

Progress against Vector’s targets is monitored by Vector’s

management and integrated into performance dashboards.

Also, Vector’s management is responsible for updating the board

on performance against these targets. For example, customer

outage performance is presented to the board in an electricity

distribution networks operational board paper.

In FY2025 short-term incentive payments for Vector’s executive

and their direct reports included a component linked to Vector’s

performance against its emissions reduction, customer outage

targets, and a climate resilience target. These incentive targets

are designed and agreed by the executive team and approved

by the board at its discretion. Specific details can be found in

the metrics and targets section on page 34.

Vector’s group oversight

The Vector group risk team is responsible for Vector’s enterprise

risk management framework. Risks, including climate-related

risks and opportunities, are identified, assessed and managed

across the group in line with the enterprise risk management

framework and the group risk assessment criteria. This

approach to risk management is designed to ensure that there

is appropriate and regular board and management oversight

of material risks identified to drive informed decision-making.

Vector’s group sustainability team consults with Vector’s

business units to drive Vector’s climate change strategy. The

group sustainability team reports to the chief public policy and

regulatory officer and sets the agenda for the climate change

steering committee. Greenhouse gas emissions are accounted

for by group finance, with transitional scenario modelling

conducted by the group insights team or external consultants,

as needed.

Governance (continued)

9

StrategyRisks

GovernanceOpportunitiesMetrics

and targets

References

and Appendix

Risk

management

Integrating climate-related disclosures with wider disclosures
Vector’s climate-related disclosures are informed by and informs a suite of inter-related disclosures.

DISCLOSUREINTEGRATION

Electricity asset

management plan

The electricity asset management plan, as required by regulation, discloses Vector’s electricity asset

management policy, objectives, information, 10-year expenditure plans, and the context in which

expenditure decisions are made. Expenditure forecasts in the asset management plan are not

commitments as they are also scrutinised through appropriate internal governance processes, and are

subject to periodic regulatory approval of capital allowances before decisions are made.

Integration with climate-related disclosures: Information relevant to the risks – inability to efficiently

manage load to avoid network congestion, increase in extreme weather events, and the distributed

energy resources opportunity – is discussed in the electricity asset management plan in the context of

the electricity network managed by Vector. While scenario analysis informs the asset management plan,

the expenditure decisions disclosed do not necessarily relate to a specific scenario. This is explained in

further detail in figure 2 on page 14. Climate-related risks are not the sole driver of asset management

investment decisions.

Gas asset

management plan

The gas asset management plan, as required by regulation, discloses Vector’s gas asset management

policy, objectives, 10-year expenditure plans, and the context in which expenditure decisions are made.

Expenditure forecasts in the asset management plan are not commitments as they are also scrutinised

through appropriate internal governance processes, and are subject to periodic regulatory approval of

capital allowances before decisions are made.

Integration with climate-related disclosures: Gas transition risk is discussed in the gas asset management

plan. While scenario analysis informs the asset management plan, the investment decisions disclosed

do not relate to a specific scenario - rather, they are investments tested against those scenarios to deliver

a prudent asset management strategy. This is explained in further detail in figure 2 on page 14. Climate-

related risks are not the sole driver of asset management investment decisions.

Greenhouse gas

emissions inventory

report

Discloses Vector’s greenhouse gas emissions, methodology, assumptions, and emissions reduction initiatives.

Integration with climate-related disclosures: The greenhouse gas emissions accounting and target are

expressed in the greenhouse gas emissions inventory report and feed into the metrics and targets section

of the climate-related disclosures.

Vector annual

report, interim

report, and

operational

performance

updates

Discloses financial and operational information at a group level.

Integration with climate-related disclosures: Operational statistics disclosed in the operational performance

update inform the metrics and targets section of the climate-related disclosures. Some information from

the climate-related disclosures, and greenhouse gas emissions inventory report is repeated in the annual

report so that fair and accurate information is available to readers of the annual report.

Electricity and

gas distribution

information

disclosures

Annual disclosures of historical financial and non-financial performance, in accordance with regulatory

information disclosure requirements.

Integration with climate-related disclosures: Metrics disclosed here inform the metrics and targets section

of the climate-related disclosures.

Electricity and gas

distribution price

quality statements

Annual assessment of performance against price path and quality standards, in accordance with

distribution services regulatory price/quality path requirements.

Integration with climate-related disclosures: Metrics disclosed here inform the metrics and targets section

of the climate-related disclosures.

Governance (continued)

10Vector climate-related disclosures 2025

StrategyRisksOpportunitiesMetrics

and targets

References

and Appendix

Risk

management

Governance

Strategy
Vector’s transition plan

Transition planning has been a key aspect of Vector’s Symphony strategy. Symphony aims to use digital technologies, and tools such

as demand-side orchestration, to more efficiently manage the electrification during the low-carbon transition. Our strategic response

to climate-related risks and opportunities has evolved alongside our understanding of those risks and how they are likely to impact

Vector. The table below contains a summary of the transition plan aspects of Vector’s strategy, describing how we plan to respond to

our material climate-related risks and opportunities and position Vector as the economy transitions towards a low-emissions, climate-

resilient future state. Further details of Vector’s business strategy, including key assumptions and barriers, can be found under each

disclosed risk and opportunity.

STRATEGIC PRIORITYCURRENT ACTIONS

LINK TO RISK/

OPPORTUNITY

Enabling the

electrification of

Auckland

Orchestrating distributed energy resources such as electric bus charging to

reduce the need for additional infrastructure spending.

Developing and deploying digital systems, integration protocols, cyber security,

and data platforms that support the development and operation of demand-

side orchestration.

Enhancing monitoring of the low voltage network to optimise infrastructure

utilisation.

Actively engaging to influence regulatory and policy settings and standards such

as regulated standards for smart electric vehicle chargers.

Actively engaging with customers to build our understanding of preferences and

behaviours, and working with retailers to evolve their offerings that influence how

and when customers use the network.

RISK 1:

inability to

efficiently

manage load to

avoid network

congestion

OPPORTUNITY 2:

distributed 

energy resources

Mitigating

stranding risk of gas

distribution network

Actively engaging with government and regulators for a managed gas transition

to recover potential stranded value.

Reviewing and replacing some capital expenditure (such as pipe replacement at

end of life) with operational expenditure (like active pipe monitoring).

Understanding customer needs, cost concerns and attitudes related to

natural gas.

RISK 2:

gas transition

Improving climate

resilience

Modelling weather impacts on Vector assets from floods, wind, landslip, fire

and cyclones.

Analysing weather models over current assets to understand asset-specific risk.

Developing projects to mitigate risk with allocated capital expenditure.

Establishing a resilience cost curve framework to prioritise resilience projects.

Surveying customers to understand their priorities and solutions to

strengthen resilience.

RISK 3:

increase in

extreme weather

events

Enabling the

digitalisation of

energy

Further developing Diverge, an energy data management software platform

for the collection, processing, storage and delivery of smart meter and related

energy data insights.

Developing strategic partnerships, such as our partnership with Tapestry, the

energy moonshot at X (Google’s innovation lab) to enable smart electricity

networks to benefit customers.

OPPORTUNITY 1:

energy platforms

Decarbonising our

operations

Setting a target to reduce Scope 1 and 2 emissions by 53.5% from our FY2020

base year (excluding electricity distribution losses).

Developing a marginal carbon cost abatement curve to prioritise

decarbonisation projects.

Not linked to a material

risk or opportunity, but is

consistent with Vector’s

Symphony strategy to help

navigate and shape the

energy transition

2


UNDERPINNED BY VECTOR’S GROUP-LEVEL SYMPHONY STRATEGY

Information regarding the extent to which transition plan aspects of Vector’s strategy are aligned with internal capital deployment

and funding decision-making processes can be found in each risk/opportunity section later in this document. With respect to

‘decarbonising our operations’, please refer to the marginal carbon cost abatement curve on page 29.

2. Decarbonising our operations is strategically important as it aligns with global efforts to limit warming to 1.5C.

However there is no risk or opportunity linked to this priority as it does not meet our materiality thresholds.

R

R

O

O

R

11

Risks

OpportunitiesMetrics

and targets

References

and Appendix

Risk

management

StrategyGovernance

 
ORDERLY DECARBONISATION

DISORDERLY DECARBONISATION

HOTHOUSE

Our approach to asset management

As a regulated entity, Vector publishes detailed 10-year electricity

and gas asset management plans, available here [3,4]. These

plans detail our prudent asset management strategy, and are

informed by asset management specific scenario modelling – see

figure 2 on page 14. While climate-related risks are an input into

asset management planning, these are collectively one of the

many risks that are considered.

Our approach to using climate scenarios

Vector developed three group climate scenarios, as outlined in

the adjacent table, which adapt data from the Intergovernmental

Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Assessment Report Six [5] for

physical analysis, and the Network for Greening the Financial

System (NGFS) [6] (an international network of central banks

and supervisory authorities including the Reserve Bank of

New Zealand) for transitional analysis. We consider that the IPCC

scenarios [5] are best suited for New Zealand physical risk impact

analysis because of their data availability. Likewise, we consider

that the NGFS scenarios are relevant to Vector’s assessments as

they capture the customer burden on an unmanaged transition.

These group scenarios were initially developed by Vector’s

management, informed by existing scenario modelling for asset

management, globally recognised scenarios, and engagement

with the wider electricity distribution and transmission sector

in New Zealand. The scenarios were revisited in FY2025 and

were considered to remain plausible and appropriate future

pathways that are fit for purpose. However, we note that, from

a global context, both the SSP5-8.5 ‘hothouse scenario’ and

SSP1-1.9 ‘orderly 1.5°C scenario’ are being re-examined and these

may be updated in future disclosures with oversight from our

climate change steering committee and board audit committee.

Because these updates are related to physical impacts, they

will affect physical climate change modelling, but they are not

expected to have impact on the underlying process to identify

material climate-related risks and opportunities. Vector does

not include carbon removals/sequestration in its underlying

scenario assumptions.

Vector worked with the wider New Zealand energy sector to

align on scenarios. This work was finalised in June 2024 and we

may consider this in our scenarios and scenario modelling in the

future. This may result in changes to our strategy, and risk and

opportunity assessments. We have not yet integrated the wider

energy sector scenarios as it will take some time to update our

numerous models.

Select assumptions of the group scenario narratives are used in

scenario modelling as relevant to the appropriate Vector business

unit. For example, when modelling future electricity load we

consider inputs such as electric vehicle uptake, demand-side

control, energy efficiency, and gas to electricity switching, but

do not include others, like temperature forecasts. Similarly when

modelling the future gas network we include assumptions

such as the regulatory settings around gas networks, but do

not include physical climate change impacts or the transitional

impacts of the electricity network. The relationship between

scenarios and modelling is detailed in figure 2. There is no

model that combines all assumptions presented in the

scenarios narratives.

Orderly decarbonisation

• Limits global average temperature to 1.5ºC

warmer by 2100 (RCP 1.9)

• Net zero by 2050 in New Zealand and globally

• Transition includes uptake of digital platforms

for demand-side management

• Rapid electrification managed through

demand response

• Regulations aligned with decarbonisation,

and pricing models that manage whole-of-

system costs

• Ongoing efforts with energy efficiency to

reduce demand

• Managed transition away from fossil fuel gas

• SSP 1-1.9

Disorderly

decarbonisation

• Global average temperature 2.7ºC warmer

by 2100 (RCP 4.5)

• New Zealand still achieves net zero by 2050 but

via a disorderly transition

• World maintains current emissions until 2050

and net zero by 2100

• Transition focuses on large-scale renewable

supply with no demand side or digitalisation

• Rapid unmanaged electrification

• Regulations lag decarbonisation efforts and

create barriers to efficient decarbonisation

• Customers bear the cost of an expensive

unmanaged transition

• Unmanaged transition from fossil fuel gas

• SSP 2-4.5

Hothouse

• Global average temperature 4.4ºC warmer by 2100

(RCP 8.5)

• Emissions triple by 2075

• Policies revert New Zealand to the fossil fuel era

• Customers bear the cost of expensive fossil

fuel energy

• Regulations block decarbonisation spending

• SSP 5-8.5

Strategy (continued)

12Vector climate-related disclosures 2025

GovernanceStrategyRisksOpportunitiesMetrics

and targets

References

and Appendix

Risk

management

 
ORDERLY DECARBONISATION

DISORDERLY DECARBONISATION

HOTHOUSE

Under the orderly decarbonisation scenario, the world shifts

gradually but pervasively towards decarbonisation. This scenario

describes a future where global net-zero emissions are reached

by 2050, and global temperatures peak around 1.6ºC by 2050 and

then decline to 1.4ºC by 2100. This prevents the most extreme

predicted impacts of climate change (which are described in

the hothouse scenario below). However, this scenario will still

result in an increase in extreme weather impacts including

flooding, increased heavy wind events, land erosion and increased

sustained hot and dry weather.

For New Zealand, the orderly decarbonisation scenario describes

a future where domestic actions and policies are consistently

aimed at achieving net-zero domestic emissions by 2050. This

scenario sees actions and policies providing for clear and early

decarbonisation actions that integrate a whole-of-system

approach, including both the supply side and demand side of the

energy system.

In relation to the electricity sector, the orderly decarbonisation

scenario’s future provides for the New Zealand electricity grid

supplying near to 100% renewable electricity by 2050. It also

assumes regulatory settings that incentivise and prioritise

demand-side energy management solutions, distributed

generation, and energy-efficiency measures, which allow the

energy sector to manage electrification and renewable generation

while avoiding substantial increases in network congestion. In

particular, this demand-side participation by energy customers

optimises the use of the existing physical electricity distribution

network to reduce inefficient capital expenditure and assumes

regulatory settings that optimise the wholesale market to

leverage the low cost of renewable power. The combined effect

keeps electricity prices low, and therefore enables an easier

transition from fossil fuels to electricity.

Globally the need for higher-quality energy data, digital platforms,

and energy analytics increases as more electric vehicles and

distributed renewable generation enter the electricity system.

With respect to the natural gas sector, the orderly decarbonisation

scenario describes a future where gas supply networks undergo

a managed transition from fossil gas in response to reduced gas

usage. This means that capital asset costs associated with existing

gas transmission and distribution assets are recovered through

early regulatory and policy changes, thereby minimising future

customer impacts as costs are recovered over a larger current

customer base.

Under the disorderly decarbonisation scenario, the world follows

a decarbonisation pathway whereby emission trends do not shift

markedly from historical patterns, with some countries making

relatively good progress while others fall short. CO

2

emissions are

expected to remain at current levels until approximately 2050 and

then fall by 2100 causing global temperatures to reach 2.0ºC by

2050, and 2.7ºC by 2100.

Consequently, with respect to physical risks of climate change,

the increased temperatures that are assumed to occur under

the disorderly decarbonisation scenario (when compared to the

orderly decarbonisation scenario) would cause more significant

weather impacts to be felt in New Zealand. These weather impacts

include physical risks to Vector’s physical assets, including our

electricity assets in particular.

In regards to transition risks, under the disorderly decarbonisation

scenario New Zealand achieves its net-zero emissions target

by 2050. However, policy measures in the lead up to 2030 lack

cohesion and the failure to coordinate policy stringency across

sectors results in inefficient capital investments.

In the electricity sector, this delay and incoherent policy approach

results in a high cost burden on energy customers (because of

inefficient investment in physical electricity assets to respond to

higher peak energy demands), and creates energy reliability issues.

Under the disorderly decarbonisation scenario, decarbonisation

policies focus on supply-side policies which enable new large-

scale renewable electricity generation and support the rapid

electrification of transportation. The absence of demand-side

management of electric vehicle charging and industry electricity

demands results in high network congestion, needing large

infrastructural upgrades with costs largely passed on to customers.

This could result in intervention by regulators and/ or government

- therefore impacting the approval of capital allowances.

The absence of demand-side management also limits customers’

abilities to leverage technology to reduce consumption at peak

periods, increasing the strain on the wholesale market and

dependence on large-scale backup generation. This failure to

realise opportunities to reduce overall energy costs through

system efficiencies results in high electricity prices. Such high

electricity prices not only intensify energy affordability issues

but also create dependency on government subsidies and high

carbon prices to achieve the 2050 targets.

In relation to the natural gas sector, the disorderly decarbonisation

scenario presumes that gas customers take and act on the view

that the long term (between 2040 - 2050) operation of piped

gas is not viable. This leads to a wind-down without regulatory or

policy intervention to preserve cost recovery leading to an increase

in cost recovery risks. In addition, gas customers face their own

stranded asset risk.

The hothouse scenario describes a future where minimal and

fragmented efforts towards climate change mitigation have

resulted in severely increased physical impacts.

Under this scenario, the rest of the world prioritises economic

and social development over decarbonisation efforts leading

to the exploitation of fossil fuel resources. As a result, under the

hothouse scenario GHG emissions triple by 2075 and global

temperatures reach 2.4ºC by 2050 and 4.4ºC by 2100.

With respect to physical risks, there would be a significant

increase in extreme weather events leading to expensive climate

change adaptation measures and low grid reliability.

Regarding transition risks, this scenario represents a future

where there is no or minimal action towards domestic

and global emissions targets. Regulations form barriers to

decarbonisation spending, and policy incentives to facilitate

faster carbon reductions are ineffective or absent. Customers

continue to bear the cost of fossil fuel energy and ongoing

climate change adaptation.

In relation to the natural gas sector, the hothouse scenario

assumes a continuation of fossil fuels such as natural gas and

LPG beyond 2050. Likewise, the electricity network only sees a

low and manageable uptake of electric vehicles through to 2080.

Strategy (continued)

13

Risks

OpportunitiesMetrics

and targets

References

and Appendix

Risk

management

StrategyGovernance

Scenarios represent plausible descriptions of how the future may
develop based on a set of assumptions, including both physical

and transitional climate-related risks in an integrated manner.

Scenarios are used to prepare for uncertain future impacts

of climate change and test the resilience of Vector’s business

model and the Symphony strategy. Scenarios are not intended

to be probabilistic or determinative of climate change. Future

group scenarios may also change in time, given the significant

interconnection with government and regulatory decisions.

Vector’s scenario analysis covers the group and all subsidiaries.

The chosen scenarios are appropriate to Vector as they allow

us to assess the resilience of our business strategy against

different potential futures that could emerge as part of the

energy transition.

As explained above, Vector’s scenario modelling informs our

strategy including our gas and electricity asset management.

Figure 2: Interconnection of Vector’s modelling with overarching climate scenarios

Electricity network:

- Net-zero emissions by 2050 in NZ

- Includes uptake of digital platforms

and demand-side management

- Rapid electrification managed

through demand response

Gas network:

- Managed transition from fossil gas

Physical:

- 1.5°C global warming by 2100

- SSP 1-1.9

ORDERLY DECARBONISATION

Electricity Network:

- Net-zero emissions by 2050 in NZ

- No demand side or digitalisation

- Rapid unmanaged electrification

Gas Network:

- Unmanaged transition from

fossil gas

Physical:

- 2.7°C global warming by 2100

- SSP 2-4.5

DISORDERLY DECARBONISATION

- Minimal and fragmented efforts

towards climate change mitigation

Physical:

- 4.4

°C global warming by 2100

- SSP 5-8.5

HOTHOUSE

Load forecast of electricity

distribution network.

Assumptions include:

- Customer growth

- Energy efficiency

- Solar/battery

- Electric vehicles

- Hot water control

- Gas to electricity

substitution

- Demand-side control

CUSTOMER SCENARIO

MODEL

Load forecast of the gas

distribution network to

2031.

Assumptions include:

- Reduction in gas

volumes

- No government or

regulatory support/

transition plan

GAS CUSTOMER

SCENARIO MODELLING

Electricity asset

management plan

- Fire risk (based on

short-term forecasts)

- Landslip (not yet

including future

precipitation scenarios)

- Cyclone risk

STAND-ALONE

PHYSICAL MODELS

Electricity asset

management plan

Not yet in electricity

asset management plan

Gas asset

management plan

Assumptions include:

- Gas wind-down by 2050

- No government or

regulatory support/

transition plan

INDUSTRY WORKING

GROUP - GAS

TRANSITION MODELLING

- Flooding

- Wind

- Coastal inundation

SCENARIO-LINKED

PHYSICAL MODELS

Vector engagement

with government and

regulators

Physical ModellingTransitional ModellingGroup Scenarios

Strategy (continued)

14Vector climate-related disclosures 2025

GovernanceStrategyRisksOpportunitiesMetrics

and targets

References

and Appendix

Risk

management

Physical impacts modelling
Drawing on our group scenarios, Vector conducts detailed

physical modelling of both acute and chronic impacts.

Physical climate modelling highlights that electrical assets

in the Auckland region are exposed to the various physical

impacts of climate change. Assessment and management of

physical risks on Vector’s electricity distribution network have

therefore been a focus.

In FY2022 Vector began assessing specific physical risks on our

electrical infrastructure assets. We did so by prioritising those

risks with the highest expected impact, being: risks associated

with higher wind-speed, flooding, landslip, fire, and ground

temperature increases. In FY2022 Vector commissioned

ClimSystems to conduct extreme wind analysis, and analyse

coastal inundation.

In FY2023 freshwater flood analysis was conducted, and in

FY2024 the flood models were improved to include flood

depth. The flood modelling results were mapped against

our electricity zone substations. In FY2025 the models were

updated to include even more infrequent, high-impact events

such as 1–500 year and 1–1000 year probabilities.

In FY2024 the University of Auckland’s Department of Civil

and Environmental Engineering conducted a land instability

assessment in relation to our overhead electricity assets.

Geospatial landslip risk maps were then mapped against

Vector’s overhead asset base to understand asset susceptibility

to landslips.

We worked closely with Earth Sciences NZ (formerly NIWA)

and Fire and Emergency New Zealand to conduct a dry year

and associated fire zone analysis for the electricity distribution

network for the subsequent summer.

Vector engaged with international electricity distribution

companies, including Florida Power & Light Company and

San Diego Gas & Electric, to help us understand and prepare

for the impacts of extreme weather events. In the case of

Florida Power & Light, this was in response to the growing

frequency and severity of cyclones, to learn more about how

they were managing their adaptation, while the work with

San Diego Gas & Electric was around how they managed their

wildfire risk.

In FY2025 Vector commissioned Earth Sciences NZ (formerly

NIWA) to explore plausible outcomes for the Auckland region

if Ex-Tropical Cyclone Gabrielle had taken a different track and

directly impacted Auckland as opposed to Hawke’s Bay. Initial

analysis highlights that the heaviest rainfall that occurred with

the actual Gabrielle event in Hawke’s Bay was now happening

over the Coromandel and Kaimai Ranges, in effect placing

Auckland in a rain-shadow region, therefore lessening the

impact. Most parts of Auckland still received around 100mm of

rainfall, and work is underway to process this data for analysis

against our assets.

Physical climate-change impact modelling is part of our

scenario analysis and informs Vector’s climate change

strategy via the asset management process and informs

the engineering and design process for works on existing

assets. For example, we have developed an approach to

Strategy (continued)

flood abatement over zone substations within flood-risk zones

and integrated those expenditures within our electricity asset

management plan. These include activities such as the raising of

assets above flood plain levels, or relocating the assets altogether.

There is usually a time-lag between Vector’s climate modelling/

analysis, and asset management processes. For example, once

an asset is identified as having a potential vulnerability, detailed

modelling and engineering studies are often required before

appropriate action can be put forward. Note that the proposed

mitigation actions in the asset management plan are not a

commitment to spend, and also require periodic regulatory

funding decisions from Vector’s economic regulator, the

Commerce Commission.

Transitional impacts modelling

The Climate Change Commission has highlighted that

electrification will be key to the decarbonisation of New Zealand’s

economy [7]. Transitional aspects of Vector’s group climate

scenarios have been selected to identify the boundary conditions

for infrastructural demand. The scenarios help us to focus on the

strategies that can better utilise existing infrastructure - such as

regulated standards for smart electric vehicle charging, which

informs our position on wider policy and regulations concerning

the electrification transition.

Through our scenario modelling, we consider elements of

both an orderly and disorderly transition to help us understand

future demand. For example, modelling of peak load under

the disorderly decarbonisation scenario assumes misaligned

management of customer assets and appliances, resulting in

the greatest peak demand. The converse is true of the orderly

decarbonisation scenario, where peak load is minimised – such as

for example through the integration of smart digital platforms,

network visibility, the alignment of customer incentives, and

demand side orchestration of customer assets.

An example of this would be electric vehicle uptake. In

a disorderly scenario, we model a greater proportion of

unmanaged electric vehicles charging during peak periods,

which ultimately increases the capacity requirements on the

network. In an orderly scenario, demand-side orchestration

results in fewer electric vehicles being charged at peak times.

This scenario modelling has been considered within Vector’s

strategy processes including the electricity asset management

plan, which presents a detailed discussion on network growth

and security in chapter 10 [3].

Transition risks to Vector’s gas network were modelled in FY2023

as part of the wider Gas Industry Futures Working Group – a

collaboration of gas distribution and transmission companies in

New Zealand. We model the disorderly transition scenario as it

relates to gas, which presumes a 2050 network wind-down with

no regulatory or policy intervention. This is appropriate to analyse

given the significant potential asset cost recovery risks. In FY2025

Vector divided the disorderly scenario of gas into three further

sub-scenarios to test different plausible customer trends of the

disorderly scenario.

15

Risks

OpportunitiesMetrics

and targets

References

and Appendix

Risk

management

StrategyGovernance

Limitations of scenario modelling
As noted on page 3, climate-related risk management, and

scenario modelling in particular, is an emerging area, and

often relies on data and methodologies that are developing

and uncertain.

By way of example, our flood modelling is largely dependent

on precipitation forecasts, pre-storm water levels, elevation

topology based on light detection and ranging (LiDAR) scans,

ground surface roughness and infiltration. The elevation topology

represents a ‘bare earth’ model and therefore does not take into

account buildings or subsurface stormwater reticulation.

Our wind modelling does not have spatial resolution, and

therefore is not geospatially integrated into our asset analysis.

This limits our ability to incorporate wind models into targeted

asset planning.

In addition, our landslip modelling does not take into account

the impacts of future precipitation.

Vector’s transitional scenario modelling on the electricity

network is also limited. For example, it only includes transitional

customer impacts, such as electric vehicle uptake, industrial

decarbonisation, new point loads, population growth, demand

response, solar/battery uptake, and energy efficiency. It does not

consider how the physical impacts of climate change (such as

temperature change) may impact customer energy demand in

the future.

We exclude the hothouse scenario in our transitional scenario

modelling as this assumes there is no transition and therefore is

an immaterial transitional impact. Hothouse is still modelled in

our physical scenario analysis.

In addition, gas network scenario models are highly sensitive to

the current and future policy and regulatory framework, future

gas prices, availability, and customer sentiment towards fossil

fuels. These regulatory settings, market conditions, and policy

settings are not yet clear and therefore our assumptions may

prove incorrect.

Value chain

In considering Vector’s exposure to climate-related risks and

opportunities, we have also taken into account the exposure of

our value chain. As part of that assessment, we have defined our

value chain as encompassing Vector’s 50% share in Bluecurrent

(formerly known as Vector Metering). It provides smart electricity

and gas meters, and related data services. Bluecurrent operates

in Australia and New Zealand.

We have also assessed upstream risks by including consideration

of climate-related risk exposure of some of our tier 1 suppliers but

have excluded tier 2 and 3 suppliers (for example, copper mining

suppliers) because of the current difficulty in analysing such a

large and complex supply chain.

Impacts on downstream customers, such as the cost of

gas appliance conversions and gas costs, are considered.

They are relevant to our assessment of climate-related risks

and opportunities.

We have also begun exploring the intersectionality between

critical infrastructure providers as part of our value chain analysis.

In FY2025 we initiated a collaboration with Auckland Transport to

analyse Vector’s ability to access critical electrical infrastructure

in a flood event.

Current transitional impacts

Vector is already observing growth in electric vehicles and

industrial decarbonisation in the Auckland region, which impacts

the load on Vector’s electricity distribution network. We are also

observing indirect transitional impacts, such as the anticipated

rapid growth of data centres in the Auckland region. While not

directly attributed to climate change, many data companies

are drawn to New Zealand because of its high renewable

electricity supply and competitive energy costs compared to

other OECD countries.

Although electricity system growth is reflected in our electricity

asset management plan - [3], it is not possible to attribute these

financial variances specifically to climate change. For example,

while growth is driven in part by electrification, it is also driven by

housing development, and changes in industrial behaviour.

It is important to note that the current increases in Vector’s

electricity distribution network pricing are largely influenced by

an increase in the weighted average cost of capital, rather than

an increase in infrastructure expenditure.

Vector has also developed Diverge, an energy data management

software platform for the collection, processing, storage and

delivery of smart meter data and its related insights. Our

electricity distribution network uses Diverge for ingesting and

storing smart meter and related energy data which can be

used to increase visibility of customer demand on Vector’s low-

voltage network.

The Ministry of Business, Innovation, and Employment (MBIE)

have indicated that gas supply is reducing faster and sooner

than previously forecast based on their most recent petroleum

reserves data (January 2025) [8]. The ministry’s expected proven

and probable future natural gas production from 1 January 2025

onwards dropped from 1,166PJ in 2024 to 960PJ in 2025, an 18%

reduction. Natural gas distributed volumes on the Vector network

have declined from 14.4PJ in FY2019 to 11.9PJ in FY2025.

In 2022 the Commerce Commission implemented accelerated

depreciation from the start of the third default price/quality path

commencing on 1 October 2022. Shortening asset life can reduce

the risk of economic network stranding. Vector is currently

engaging with the Commerce Commission on the next price

path reset, and highlights that more focus is required to manage

stranding risk to preserve incentives to invest and ensure

remaining customers are not burdened with material price rises

in later years. For more information, see risk 2: gas transition.

In FY2025 Vector recognised an impairment loss of $37 million

in regard to goodwill allocated to the gas distribution business.

The impairment was recognised following due consideration

of updated forecasts in our gas asset management plan. These

forecasts show a decline in net connections to the gas network

from FY2026, and the overall gas volume continuing to decline,

but at a faster rate than in prior years. This follows a FY2024

goodwill impairment of $60 million. Following the impairment,

the carrying value of the gas distribution business is consistent

with the estimated value of the regulated asset base.

Strategy (continued)

16Vector climate-related disclosures 2025

GovernanceStrategyRisksOpportunitiesMetrics

and targets

References

and Appendix

Risk

management

Strategy (continued)
Current physical impacts

In recent years, including FY2025, Vector’s electricity network

has been impacted by extreme weather events. These include:

High wind-speeds, storms and cyclonic events: Responsible

for power outages, largely through vegetation falling on Vector’s

electricity distribution network, and related repair costs.

Flooding: Resulting in flood damage, asset relocation costs,

operational costs to disconnect and reconnect power for the

safety of our customers, and geo-technical instability leading

to landslips and increased vegetation fall.

In FY2025 Cyclone Tam followed by a thunderstorm caused

about 1,600 low-voltage faults, and 231 high-voltage faults

resulting in over 79,000 customers losing power. The latest

estimate is that the associated costs to Vector for electricity

maintenance as a result of Cyclone Tam resulted in a cost of

approximately $1.7 million.

For interest, the FY2023 Auckland Anniversary floods and

Cyclone Gabrielle resulted in a cost of $17.1 million.

Hot and dry weather: Reducing current capacity in electricity

assets and increasing the risk of electrical equipment failing or

causing wildfires.

Vector’s material risks and opportunities

From our scenario analysis, we have identified three risks and

two opportunities. Their mapping against our scenarios are

highlighted in figure 3, and expanded on the subsequent pages.

Orderly

decarbonisation

Disorderly

decarbonisation

Hothouse

1. Energy platforms

2. Distributed energy resources

1. Inability to efficiently manage

load to avoid network congestion

2. Gas transition

3. Increase in extreme

weather events

OPPORTUNITIES

RISKS

R

O

Figure 3: Mapping of scenarios to Vector’s risks and opportunities

17

Risks

OpportunitiesMetrics

and targets

References

and Appendix

Risk

management

StrategyGovernance

RISK 1:
Inability to efficiently manage load

to avoid network congestion

Risk description

Key scenario: disorderly decarbonisation

Type: transitional – policy risk

Sector: electricity distribution network

Geography: Auckland

In a disorderly decarbonisation scenario, an absence of

timely policy, regulatory and market changes results

in customer peak demand increasing faster than

average annual usage. Subject to network response and

planning, two different future scenarios may emerge:

a) a highly congested network with network

connection queues and reliability challenges; or

b) a strong increase in physical network investment

leading to affordability challenges for customers.

Time period

Long term: 10 – 30 years

‒ Direct integration of distributed energy resources, and their

management systems, with our network management

systems. An example of this could be a dynamic operating

envelope which could provide network limits to retailers’

systems in real-time in response to electricity constraints on

the network

‒ Enabling digital systems, integration protocols, cyber security,

and data platforms

‒ Visibility of the low-voltage network, including distribution

transformer and distributed energy resource visibility for more

efficient planning

‒ Active engagement for regulatory and policy settings and

standards such as regulated standards for smart electric

vehicle chargers

‒ Network modernisation to support whole-of-system planning,

distributed energy resource integration and detection

‒ Active customer engagement to build our understanding

of preferences and behaviours, and working with retailers to

evolve their offering that influence how and when customers

use the network.

These initiatives are incorporated into Vector’s internal capital

deployment and funding decision-making processes through

our electricity asset management plan [3].

Examples of actions to date that support Vector’s risk

management strategy include:

‒ Using data and insights from our gas network to inform

electricity demand forecast from gas to electricity switching

‒ Building capability to on-board large customers onto

Vector’s distributed energy resource management system

for demand response which can minimise the capital cost

for those customers

‒ Further developing Diverge, an energy data management

software platform for the collection, processing, storage and

delivery of smart meter data and related insights

‒ Increasing low-voltage network visibility via the aggregation

of existing smart meter data to understand remaining low-

voltage headroom

‒ Developing a load management protocol with retailers

operating customer devices, and introducing a commercial

distributed energy resource tariff to enable more efficient use

of existing network capacity by commercial customers with

flexible loads

‒ Building solutions using bespoke services, co-developed

between Vector Technology Solutions and AWS

‒ Working with Tapestry, the energy moonshot at X (Google’s

innovation lab) as one of a select group of global partners,

collaborating on the next generation of platforms for network

management. For more details, see opportunity 1: energy

platforms on page 21.

Changes to this strategy may emerge in response to regulatory,

technology and market changes, scientific developments, and

customer preferences.

Anticipated impacts

Scenario modelling highlights that under a disorderly

decarbonisation scenario the growth over the next 30 years

would result in a substantially stronger increase in peak demand

compared to an annual increase in consumption on Vector’s

network. Under this disorderly scenario, the absence of demand-

side orchestration leads to two fundamental issues as described

in the risk section above:

If network investment is lagging demand because of

unanticipated rapid peak demand growth, the network will

be increasingly congested and new connections queues will

become increasingly long. If prolonged and at scale, this could

lead to customer outages, slow down economic growth and limit

decarbonisation efforts.

Conversely, if traditional network investment is significantly

ahead of demand growth or caters to an increasingly high peak

demand, it may lead to a strong build-out of physical network

infrastructure that locks in cost and lacks flexibility.

Both issues may pose risks such as higher customer costs

and economic slowdown. This could result in intervention by

regulators and/or government, impacting the return on the

deployed assets and reputational loss.

Vector’s risk management strategy

Vector’s strategy to manage this risk over the medium-term

period to 2035 involves the effective demand-side orchestration

of distributed energy resources (such as electric vehicles and hot

water), and the deployment of non-wires alternatives to smooth

load profiles. This includes increasing our ability and capability to

manage these distributed energy resources (either ourselves, or

through third parties), and the alignment of market, regulatory

and policy settings to support and enable this. Also included

is the management of loads during critical events, such as a

network or grid emergency, to ensure electricity system stability.

To defer investment in traditional infrastructure and manage

the network securely, Vector needs certainty that customers’

demand will be shifted outside peak periods. At a high level,

delivery of our Symphony strategy to address this risk involves:

R

18Vector climate-related disclosures 2025

GovernanceStrategyRisksOpportunitiesMetrics

and targets

References

and Appendix

Risk

management

RISK 2:
Gas transition

Risk description

Key scenario: disorderly decarbonisation

Type: transitional – policy risk, market risk

Sector: gas

Geography: Auckland

An absence of timely policy and regulatory decisions on

the gas transition, combined with upstream gas supply

shortages gives rise to a disorderly decarbonisation

scenario, where gas infrastructure companies and their

connected customers are potentially exposed to material

transition costs, disruption and gas-asset stranding risk.

Time period

Short term: 0 – 5 years

Medium term: 5 – 10 years

Long term: 10 – 30 years

‒ Requiring 100% customer contributions for new gas connections

and associated network growth costs.

In FY2025 Vector began engagement with the Commerce

Commission in relation to the upcoming price path reset. This

is a regulatory framework that determines the maximum revenues of

gas distribution networks over the next period from 1 October 2026.

Vector has proposed that the Commission:

‒ Moves the form of control from a weighted average price cap to a

revenue cap

‒ Agrees that the regulated asset base should not be indexed to

inflation to avoid increasing stranding risk

‒ Implements a more aggressive approach to mitigating stranding

risk to ensure more asset value is recovered over the current larger

customer base

‒Updates the assumptions in its asset stranding model to further

accelerate depreciation

‒ Creates a step up in operational expenditure allowances to support

the transition of some capital expenditure to operational expenditure

‒ Clarifies its view on how decommissioning costs should be treated

under the regulatory framework.

Examples of actions taken by Vector as part of this strategy to reduce

capital recovery risk to date include:

‒ Informing both government and regulators as to the criticality of

preserving the principle of regulated investment cost recovery. An

example of this is Vector’s paper to government on ‘Managing the

gas transition – options preserving solutions to manage customer

risks from gas asset stranding’ in FY2024 [9]

‒Proposing that the Commerce Commission implements

accelerated depreciation from the start of the third default price/

quality path commencing 1 October 2022

‒ Requiring 100% customer contributions for new gas connections

and associated network growth costs as of 1 October 2022

‒ Not proceeding with some previously forecast capital projects,

such as future-proofing ducting

‒ Reducing system growth to zero in the RY2025 gas asset

management plan

‒ Forming the Gas Infrastructure Future Working Group alongside

Clarus and Powerco, after engagement with the Ministry of

Business Innovation and Employment. The purpose was to

explore scenarios for the end-state and transition options for gas

infrastructure [10].

This risk serves as an input into Vector’s financial planning process

via our gas network asset management plan [4]. It is important to

note that it is not possible to deploy additional capital to manage

this risk. Rather, the risk is being managed by reducing capital

expenditure where safely possible to reduce exposure to further asset

stranding risk. For example, in FY2021 the gas asset management

plan had a 10-year forecast of net capital expenditure of $86 million

(inflated to forecast 2026 dollars). In Vector’s most recent gas asset

management plan the 10-year forecast of net capital expenditure has

dropped to $43 million (inflated to forecast 2026 dollars) – which has

been partially offset through higher operational maintenance costs.

Note that the gas asset management plan discloses gross capex

which includes customer connections and asset relocations which

do not contribute to stranding risk as they are largely funded by the

customer. We chose, therefore, to disclose net capex here as this is the

portion attributed to stranding risk.

Because of the significant impact of evolving markets and

government policy, updates to this risk, relevant scenarios, and

strategy may need to be considered in future years’ climate-related

disclosures and asset management plans.

Anticipated impact

There is uncertainty over the future asset life utilisation (capacity

and longevity) of gas networks. This is driven by New Zealand’s

targets for net-zero carbon emissions by 2050, combined with a

shortage of upstream gas supply, declining gas consumption, and

inconsistent government policy direction to adequately manage the

transition. Under the disorderly decarbonisation scenario, there is a

risk that the government or regulator doesn’t honour the principle

of regulated investment cost recovery. This introduces a stranded

asset risk whereby investment recovery is not achieved over the long

term. This may also lead to further impairments of the value of the

gas business.

Vector has already experienced a 17% decline in gas volumes since

2019, and our medium-term scenario modelling under the disorderly

transition highlights that this trend will continue. This is driven by a

combination of numerous factors which include decarbonisation,

gas scarcity, and business closure or relocation from Auckland.

Vector’s risk management strategy

Vector’s short-term cash-flow risk is because of the Commerce

Commission’s approach to using a weighted average price cap,

which incentivises gas distribution companies like Vector to grow gas

demand – and therefore financially penalises gas distributors if gas

volumes are lower than the Commerce Commission’s forecasts. We

have proposed that New Zealand follows the approach of the UK, which

uses a revenue cap whereby our revenue is determined regardless of

how much gas is conveyed. Vector has also been moving our pricing

to fixed charges, which mitigates some short-term volume decline.

Mitigating long-term capital recovery risk requires action by

regulators to make timely changes that accelerate the recovery

of capital from current customers before an increased rate of

disconnections puts that capital recovery at risk.

Vector’s approach to mitigating gas stranding risk focuses on:

‒ Advocating for regulatory intervention to accelerate

depreciation of gas assets

‒ Seeking regulatory allowances for end-of-life treatment

of the gas network, such as decommissioning

‒ Reducing capital expenditure where safely possible to minimise

added stranded value. This includes substituting some capital

projects with operational projects.

R

19

GovernanceStrategyRisksOpportunitiesMetrics

and targets

References

and Appendix

Risk

management

RISK 3:
Increase in extreme weather events

Risk description

Key scenarios: orderly and disorderly

decarbonisation, hothouse

Type: physical – acute

Sector: electricity distribution network

Geography: Auckland

All scenarios identify an increase in extreme weather

events which is expected to cause disruption to the

Vector network in the Auckland region. These include

increasing wind-speeds, freshwater flooding, coastal

flooding, cyclonic activity, land erosion, and an increase

in sustained hot and dry weather leading to elevated

wildfire risk. These weather impacts are physical risks

to our assets, in particular our electricity distribution

infrastructure assets.

Time period

Short term: 0 – 5 years

Medium term: 5 – 10 years

Long term: 10 – 30 years

Climate modelling across all scenarios shows that the length

and severity of sustained hot and dry weather will increase too.

This, in combination with high wind-speeds, raises the risk of fire

start from Vector’s electricity distribution network under normal

operating conditions. Furthermore, warmer weather decreases

electrical asset capacity ratings.

Vector’s risk management strategy

Vector developed a risk scoring system which uses results

from climate change models, along with internal engineering

expertise. Each climate-related risk to specific assets is given

a risk score based on a set of specific criteria. Summing all our

analysed risks comes to a total risk score of 431 risk points. This

is not an exhaustive list, and more risks will be added as Vector’s

climate-change modelling continues to mature.

This risk serves as an input into Vector’s financial planning

process via our electricity asset management plan. We have

put forward approximately $300 million worth of projects for

inclusion in Vector’s FY2025 electricity asset management plan

[3]. These projects undergo further refinement beyond the

description included in the electricity asset management plan.

It is important to note that the electricity asset management

plan is not a commitment to spend, and projects will be

refined continually, for example with final tree regulations

being implemented.

Examples of projects in progress include:

‒Continuous asset monitoring and modernisation of our

planned maintenance programmes to identify potential

weaknesses early. This includes the use of aerial inspection

and development of artificial intelligence (AI) based condition

assessment in partnership with Tapestry, the energy

moonshot at X (Google’s innovation lab)

‒ Infrastructure upgrading to improve flood resilience at key

zone substations

‒ Transferring load from our highest flood-risk zone substation

so that it can be decommissioned (Ngātaringa Bay

zone substation)

‒ Reconfiguring parts of the electricity network to create

multiple pathways for power to flow (known as meshing),

and adding network automation to quickly re-route power.

In some cases, meshing can be substituted with standby

distributed generation

‒ Upgrading overhead lines with more resilient technologies

‒ Reducing the risk of the network starting a wildfire during

normal operations. Examples of risk reduction include the

implementation of seasonal ratings, use of safer fuses and the

potential to switch off reclosers on extreme-heat days

‒ The Government has announced a decision on the long-

awaited reform of the tree trimming regulations. These

changes will help us to better protect our lines from trees, and

so protect our customers’ electricity supply, however the cost

recovery challenges of tree trimming remain unaddressed in

these changes

‒ Ongoing engagement with Earth Sciences NZ (formerly

NIWA) and Fire and Emergency New Zealand for the

FY2025 summer.

Anticipated impact

All scenarios highlight an increase in extreme weather events

because of climate change compared with historical trends, with

the most severe impacts in the hothouse scenario. Key impacts

are customer outages, reputational risks and regulatory risks/

fines from those outages, public safety risks, and asset costs

(via either repair or reinforcing) to Vector’s network.

Our flood modelling scenario analysis conducted in FY2024

considered 113 zone substations out to the year 2100. It

highlighted 13 zone substations that are identified to be at

potential risk of flooding. Only certain assets (such as the control

gear) within these 13 zone substations are modelled as being

as vulnerable. A total of 15 projects have been identified to

mitigate these risks. Examples include the raising of assets above

flood levels. These projects need to be assessed through the

appropriate internal governance process for approval of capital

allowances before they can be actioned. In FY2025 we completed

one of our flood mitigation projects, reducing the number of

flood exposed zone substations to 12.

Regarding coastal inundation, only one zone substation

was identified as being at risk and is currently being

decommissioned.

Wind-speed models to the year 2100 highlight that the hours

of heavy wind-speeds per year are forecast to increase across

all scenarios. As heavy wind-speeds resulting in vegetation fall

are responsible for significant damage on the Vector network,

an increase in heavy wind-speed frequency would increase

unplanned outages resulting in additional expenditure for

network repair, and heighten the risk that Vector does not meet

our regulatory quality standards. In addition, the cascading

effects of floods with high wind-speeds can weaken the

geo-technical stability of the ground, leading to increased

tree fall, landslips and delayed network repair until the water

has subsided. Landslip susceptibility analysis from FY2025

highlighted 351 power poles in potentially very high landslip risk.

R

20Vector climate-related disclosures 2025

GovernanceStrategyRisksOpportunitiesMetrics

and targets

References

and Appendix

Risk

management

OPPORTUNITY 1:
Energy platforms

Opportunity description

Key scenario: orderly decarbonisation

Type: transitional – market, products

and services

Sector: electricity

Geography: global

In the orderly decarbonisation scenario, better access

to data and the use of intelligent digital platforms to

move loads to off-peak times would improve network

utilisation and efficiency. Advanced meters, the data

they provide and the accessibility of that data can be

used to increase network visibility, enable demand-

side management, and improve network operations,

customer service, and the innovation of new products

and services.

The need for Vector to build capability to process

large, varied datasets has driven our investment in

digital platforms. We have developed Diverge, an

energy data management software platform for the

collection, processing, storage and delivery of smart

meter and related energy data. Diverge is being used

by Bluecurrent (a provider of smart metering services

and solutions that is 50% owned by Vector) to provide

energy data to electricity distribution network operators

in Australia and New Zealand, to improve the visibility

of the impacts of distributed renewable generation and

electrification on their networks.

Vector’s electricity distribution network also uses Diverge

for ingesting and storing smart meter and related energy

data to provide various analytical functions and insights.

Time period

Short term: 0 – 5 years

Medium term: 5 – 10 years

Vector’s opportunity management strategy

We are building solutions using bespoke services co-developed

between Vector’s wholly owned subsidiary Vector Technology

Solutions (VTS) and AWS. This has seen VTS establish the Diverge

solution for Bluecurrent and Vector as well as launch a go-to-

market initiative for international markets.

Beyond the arrangements with Bluecurrent, Vector’s

electricity distribution network also uses Diverge for ingesting

and storing smart meter and related energy data for various

analytical functions.

We are also continuing our partnership with X (Google’s

innovation lab), contributing to their Tapestry project, as one

of a select group of global partners collaborating on next-

generation platforms for network management. These tools

include Tapestry’s ‘GridAware’, which uses new technology

including drones and applies machine learning and modern

artificial intelligence processes to survey and guide maintenance

of the network. This enhances the job of traditional network

inspection, which is much more labour intensive, through

greater efficiency and new inspection techniques. Another tool,

Tapestry’s ‘Grid Planning Tool for Distribution’, creates robust

network simulations that incorporate optimised solutions for

new technology such as solar photovoltaic installations and the

growth of customer-owned devices like batteries and electric

vehicle chargers, to ensure an efficient network.

These two partnerships support key components of our

Symphony strategy, using digital solutions and innovation to

enable more efficient use of the network, and improve our

planning capabilities. This opportunity is funded from the Vector

group’s annual budget, along with out-of-cycle requests from the

board when specific opportunities arise. We note the Commerce

Commission’s innovation and non-traditional solutions allowance

(INTSA) which could provide up to $28.4 million in research and

development during the current five-year regulatory period.

The specific internal capital deployment and funding decisions

related to this opportunity are not disclosed here because of

commercial sensitivity.

Anticipated impact

The need for more, higher-quality, and near-real-time energy

data can be expected to increase as more distributed energy

resources such as electric vehicles and intermittent renewable

generation capacity enter the electricity system. Developing

energy platforms like Diverge would allow Vector to improve

management of our electricity distribution network and offer this

capability as a service to other networks, both locally and globally.

This would therefore enable us to better serve our customers and

monetise this technology in the future.

O

21

StrategyRisks

Metrics

and targets

References

and Appendix

Risk

management

OpportunitiesGovernance

OPPORTUNITY 2:
Distributed energy resources

Opportunity description

Key scenario: orderly decarbonisation

Type: transitional – resource efficiency

Sector: electricity

Geography: Auckland

In the orderly decarbonisation scenario, distributed solar,

batteries (including vehicle-to-grid (V2G)) and micro-

grids (including utility-scale batteries) – combined with

smart, remotely manageable energy systems (such

as hot water load control and smart electric vehicle

chargers) – act as demand-side energy resources

that complement centralised large-scale electricity

generation. Efficient and effective demand-side

management of these distributed energy resources

presents an opportunity for Vector’s role to evolve to

include more advanced distribution system operation

(DSO), involving advanced integrated network planning,

evolved commercial arrangements with third parties,

and more active network management. This has the

added benefit of contributing to the mitigation of risk

1: inability to efficiently manage load to avoid network

congestion.

Time period

Short term: 0 – 5 years

Medium term: 5 – 10 years

Long term: 10 – 30 years

Vector’s opportunity management strategy

Vector’s future network road map, detailed in section 2 of

the 2024

3

electricity asset management plan, consists of

four priority areas:

‒ Achieving supportive commercial, regulatory and policy

settings. During the short term, we will continue working with

market participants, regulators, policy-makers and appliance/

network standard agencies to work towards settings that

enable the demand-side orchestration of distributed energy

resources. We expect a more rapid addition of distributed

energy resources in the medium term

‒Understanding customer needs and preferences in relation

to the management of distributed energy resources. Vector

continues to invest in analytics to understand customer needs

and behaviours, and increase communication with electricity

retailers to gather insights

‒Increasing our access to distributed energy resource capacity

– through improved visibility of distributed energy resources,

demand-side management, evolved pricing and commercial

mechanisms, continued coordination with third parties such

as electricity retailers, and direct integration of distributed

energy resources with our network management systems

‒ Building capability, by continuing to make no-regrets

investments in new enabling technologies, developing new

commercial arrangements and operating protocols with

third parties, and increasing our understanding of customer

response to load management practices and incentives.

This opportunity serves as an input into Vector’s financial

planning process via our electricity asset management plan.

Vector’s FY2025 electricity asset management plan includes

approximately $50 million of capital deployment towards

distributed energy resource management over the next 10 year

period. This forms part of the non-network digital capex forecasts

in our electricity asset management plan. This opportunity is

further supported by the platforms highlighted in opportunity 1:

energy platforms.

3. A detailed asset management plan which includes narratives such as the future network roadmap is only published every second year.

The last detailed asset management plan for electricity was in 2024. The 2025 plan was a shorter update.

Anticipated impact

Efficient demand-side management and orchestration of

distributed energy resources connected to the network has

the potential to reduce peak congestion on the network and

manage network security during emergency events (such as

storms). This may support Vector’s electricity distribution network

to reduce unnecessary capital deployment and avoid increased

customer costs.

Orchestration of distributed energy resources is also crucial after

network outages. If appropriately managed, the distributed

energy resources could support and stabilise a network restart.

However, if they are not controlled, and all demand turns

on as power is restored, it could cause a large instantaneous

spike in demand which could overload transformers and

distribution lines – and trip protection devices, therefore delaying

network restoration.

Future industry architecture, and the scope of advanced

distribution system operation (including new functions and

capability required) are currently the subject of much discussion

among the electricity industries in New Zealand and globally.

The Electricity Authority has expressed a preference to ensure

risks of potential conflicts of interest across these functions

are mitigated, which could include ring-fencing of certain

DSO functions from network ownership and operation. While

not strictly a threat to the achievement of the objectives of

Vector’s strategy, this could reduce the scope and scale of

the opportunities available to the Vector group in executing

the strategy.

O

22

22

Vector climate-related disclosures 2025

GovernanceStrategyRisksOpportunitiesMetrics

and targets

References

and Appendix

Risk

management

Communication and consultation
Establish the context

Risk assessment

Identify risk

Analyse risk

Evaluate risk

Treat risk

Monitoring and review

Risk management

Vector’s approach to risk management

Vector’s group enterprise risk management framework is

consistent with the risk management standard ISO 31000.

The framework is embedded in our business through our risk

governance, policies, guidelines and risk partnership model that

the group risk team maintains with the different business units

to support Vector’s risk management.

Figure 4: Vector’s enterprise risk management framework

We use a risk assessment criterion within our group enterprise

risk management framework to support a consistent approach

to risk management across the Vector group. Our board risk

and assurance committee has responsibility for overseeing and

reviewing our group enterprise risk management framework,

and the related policies, and Vector’s group material risks.

Our process for identifying and prioritising material

climate-related risks and opportunities

Risks or opportunities are assessed as material if their residual

risk is assessed as high to very high based on the group risk

assessment criteria – which takes into consideration severity and

likelihood. In addition to this, Vector also employs the following

two criteria specifically for the climate-related disclosure process:

‒ A risk or opportunity has a potential financial impact greater

than 5% of Vector’s market capitalisation

‒A risk or opportunity contributes to or forms a barrier to

emission reductions outside of Vector’s organisational

boundary which constitutes more than 1% of

national emissions.

If the risk or opportunity meets any of the above criteria, it is

considered material and prioritised, with oversight from the

climate change steering committee. A summary of climate-

related risks and opportunities is reviewed by the board risk and

assurance committee.

As part of our bottom-up approach, the group risk team work

to identify new climate-related risks with all business units.

While we only directly engage our internal business units in our

risk review, we consider our value chain when analysing and

managing climate-related risks and opportunities. This includes

our upstream supply chain, downstream customer impacts, and

Vector’s subsidiaries and investments (excluding investments

that fall below 20% ownership

4

). Our approach to defining our

value chain boundary and exclusions is discussed in the value

chain subsection of the strategy section on page 16.

4. At the date of this report, Vector has no investments below 20% ownership.

23

StrategyRisks

Metrics

and targets

References

and Appendix

Risk

management

OpportunitiesGovernance

Figure 5: Vector’s climate-related risk and opportunity management process flow. This process occurs annually.
Review and update existing climate-change risks

and opportunities. Identify changes in risks and

opportunities, trends and ratings.

Prioritise high-level climate-change-related risks

and opportunities.

List of prioritised climate-change-related risks and

opportunities approved by board risk and

assurance committee.

Working with operational business units to collect

data and metrics for recognised targets.

Changes to scenarios and methodology for risk

quantification presented to board audit committee.

Engagement with external advisors to identify

gaps and improve reporting.

Group sustainability and group risk and

resilience teams engage with key stakeholders

across the Vector group.

Discuss and update mitigations and

their effectiveness.

Refine inputs, assumptions and methodologies

for modelling.

High-level climate change risks and

opportunities presented to the climate

change steering committee.

Involvement of group finance to assess risks

and opportunities.

First draft of climate-related disclosures presented

to board audit committee.

Oct

Nov

March

June

Risk management (continued)

24Vector climate-related disclosures 2025

GovernanceStrategyRisksOpportunitiesMetrics

and targets

References

and Appendix

Risk

management

Our process for understanding the impacts of risks
and opportunities

Vector also conducts more detailed physical and transitional

risk modelling to understand the business impacts and

opportunities. These are described on page 15, and summarised

here for completeness.

Physical risks

Vector quantitatively and qualitatively studies physical risk,

working with the University of Auckland’s Department of Civil

and Environmental Engineering, Earth Sciences NZ (formerly

NIWA) and ClimSystems.

To date, Vector has investigated the following climate-related

physical risks:

‒ Fluvial and pluvial flood exposure across all electrical assets

‒ Flood-depth exposure at zone substations

‒ Extreme high water level from coastal inundation across

zone substations

‒ Projected increase in frequency and duration of high wind-

speeds generally (not against any specific asset type)

‒Flood and wind impacts from cyclones

‒ Landslip risk to overhead electricity assets

‒ Fire risk after extended periods of hot and dry weather,

which could be triggered by Vector’s overhead assets

under normal operating conditions.

Risk management (continued)

Transition risks

To evaluate transition risks and opportunities, the Vector

group insights team uses a customer scenario model to

estimate the impact of energy transitions, such as the uptake

of electric vehicles, on the electricity distribution network. The

model supports Vector to assess potential future load growth

requirements, plan for network flexibility requirements, and

understand the impact this may have on our customers.

Further details of this scenario model, including high-level

model assumptions, can be found in the strategy section

and are explained in section 10 of Vector’s electricity asset

management plan [3].

The Vector insights team also uses a scenario model to evaluate

different elements of the disorderly transition on the gas network.

Time frames

We use the time horizons below in our scenario analysis and

physical and transitional risks and opportunities assessment.

As explained below, each time horizon has been selected

because of its link to our asset planning horizons and capital

deployment plans:

‒ Short term (0-5 years), to reflect typical business planning

and regulated price path cycles which sets Vector’s regulated

revenue streams

‒ Medium term (5-10 years), to allow for our asset management

plans for gas and electricity networks that detail capital and

operational expenditure forecasts over a 10-year period

‒ Long term (10-30 years), to account for longer impacts over

existing and future planned assets and business activities.

25

StrategyRisks

Metrics

and targets

References

and Appendix

Risk

management

OpportunitiesGovernance

Metrics and targets
Vector uses metrics and targets to measure and manage our

climate-related risks and opportunities disclosed in the strategy

section. Within this disclosure we also include our scope 1, 2

and 3 greenhouse gas emissions, and our target to reduce

select emissions.

Greenhouse gas emissions

We have published our greenhouse gas emissions in our FY2025

greenhouse gas emission inventory (GHG inventory) report,

available here [1].

Vector measures and reports our greenhouse gas emissions in

accordance with:

‒ The greenhouse gas protocol – a corporate accounting and

reporting standard

‒ The greenhouse gas protocol – scope 2 guidance

‒ The greenhouse gas protocol’s corporate value chain (scope 3)

accounting and reporting standard

‒ Other related technical guidance issued under the

greenhouse gas protocol standard.

Together we refer to these as the greenhouse gas protocol. This

splits greenhouse gas emissions into three categories:

Scope 1 – Direct emissions from sources Vector directly owns

or controls such as emissions from our vehicle fleet’s fuel

combustion, our diesel backup generators, methane leaks from

our natural gas distribution network, and SF

6

leaks from our

electricity distribution network.

Scope 2 – Indirect emissions from Vector’s consumption of

purchased electricity, and electricity distribution losses along

the network.

Scope 3 – All other indirect value chain emissions, including

customer energy consumption, and supply chain emissions.

The greenhouse gas protocol splits scope 3 emissions into

15 categories. A breakdown of Vector’s emissions by scope

and category can be found in table 3 with bespoke emissions

intensity metrics in table 2.

All calculations are expressed in total tonnes of carbon dioxide

equivalent (tCO₂e).

Vector uses the operational control approach, as defined by

the greenhouse gas protocol, to measure and report emissions.

This allows emissions reduction efforts to focus on emissions

over which Vector has the greatest control, and thereby can

influence most.

Our base year for emissions reporting is FY2020 (1 July 2019 to

30 June 2020). Vector recalculates emissions of historic years if

the inventory is affected by changes that in aggregate total 5%

of our carbon footprint. These changes can be structural (for

example acquisitions or divestments), changes in the way the

inventory is calculated, or discovery of omissions or errors. Vector

might decide to update historic years for changes below the

threshold for other reasons, such as consistency or clarity.

Additional information on Vector’s organisational boundaries for

the purpose of emissions calculation, including the treatment of

investments, operational boundaries, emission factors, exclusions,

summary of changes to previous years, methodologies, and

results, can be found in Vector’s greenhouse gas emissions

inventory report [1].

5. Vector made a public commitment to net-zero emissions by 2030 in 2017, which contemplated the use of offsets. This commitment has

since been updated in FY2021 with an additional absolute emissions-reduction target to reduce our absolute scope 1 and 2 emissions by

53.5% by FY2030, which does not anticipate use of offsets. In FY2025 Vector has used the 53.5% target to manage our climate-related risks

and opportunities and it is against this target that we track our performance.

Independent limited assurance over Vector’s greenhouse

gas emissions inventory was provided by KPMG (see Vector’s

greenhouse gas emissions inventory report [1]).

Emissions reduction target

In FY2021 Vector set an absolute emissions reduction target.

That target is for Vector to reduce our scope 1 and 2 emissions

(excluding electricity distribution losses) by 53.5% by FY2030 from

a FY2020 baseline. The target was developed by thinkstep-anz in

2021, based on a methodology published by the Science Based

Target Initiative (SBTi) and the SBTi’s then applicable guidance

on reductions required to be consistent with keeping global

warming to 1.5°C.

Our target has not been validated by SBTi because SBTi’s

methodology provided for the inclusion of emissions related to

electricity distribution losses, which we have excluded. Further

detail regarding this exclusion is set out on page 27.

The emissions reduction target does not rely on any offsets

5

.

Vector does not have any interim targets. However, we have

internal emissions reduction targets that are weighted to staff

remuneration, which are explained in more detail on page 34.

In FY2025 we achieved our emission reduction target, five years

ahead of the original FY2030 target date, with a reduction in our

scope 1 and 2 emissions (excluding distribution losses) of 55%

compared to the FY2020 base year. This was largely because

of a reduction in natural gas fugitive emissions, along with a

reduction in diesel-generation-related emissions.

Meeting the target in FY2025 does not guarantee that the

emissions reductions can be maintained in subsequent years.

There are key risks highlighted in table 4 that could result in

Vector missing our target in any given year.

Our total emissions across all three scopes (including electricity

distribution losses) have decreased by 54% since FY2020. This is

mainly owing to a reduction in natural gas consumption in the

Auckland region, combined with a wind-down of Vector’s Natural

Gas Trading contracts.

Vector’s emissions intensity, in table 2, has also decreased across

four out of five categories, which are linked to our emissions

reductions across our gas and electricity businesses. The final

metric, ‘kgCO2e per MWh delivered – including electricity

distribution losses’ fluctuates largely owing to New Zealand’s

national electricity emission factor, however this can also change

because of characteristics on our distribution network, which

can be a result of several factors including load profiles, and

distance to load.

A breakdown of emissions by scope and a comparison of

emissions per scope since Vector’s base year in FY2020 can

be found in table 3. These summaries of emissions have been

extracted from our greenhouse gas emissions inventory report [1].

26Vector climate-related disclosures 2025

GovernanceStrategyRisksOpportunitiesMetrics

and targets

References

and Appendix

Risk

management

Metrics and targets (continued)
Table 2: GHG emissions intensity of select scope 1 and 2 emissions

EMISSIONS INTENSITYEMISSIONS SOURCES INCLUDEDFY2020FY2021 FY2022FY2023FY2024FY2025

kgCO

2

e per gas pipeline

length in m

Total natural gas fugitive emissions2.661.962.331.901.341.12

kg CO

2

e per main** lines

length in m

Natural gas fugitive emissions

attributable to main lines

1.021.091.350.780.770.53

kg CO

2

e per service** lines

length in m

Natural gas fugitive emissions

attributable to service lines

5.223.043.643.541.861.69

kgCO

2

e per MWh delivered

– excluding electricity

distribution losses***

Stationary combustion, SF

6

,

and location-based electricity

consumption of Vector’s electricity

business

0.530.540.690.580.470.26

kgCO

2

e per MWh delivered

– including electricity

distribution losses***

Stationary combustion, SF

6

, location-

based electricity consumption of

Vector’s electricity business, and

electricity distribution losses

4.434.585.365.563.544.82

** Main gas lines refer to the shared pipeline infrastructure, while service lines connect the customer to the main line.

*** Electricity distribution losses are excluded from our emissions reduction target (see explanation above).

Figure 6: (left) Emissions included in Vector’s emissions reduction target - scope 1 and 2 excluding distribution losses and their

comparison to the FY2020 base year. (right) Vector’s yearly scope 1 and 2 emissions excluding distribution losses since FY2020.

Emissions are in tCO₂e.

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

Group emissionsFY2030 target

Emissions (tCO


e)

FY30FY29FY28FY27FY26FY25FY24FY23FY22FY21FY20

FY2030 emissions

reduction target

FY2025FY2020

Emissions (tCO

e)

Electricity

consumption

(market-based)

Vehicle

fleet

Stationary

combustion

including

biogenic

carbon

Other

fugitive

emissions

SF

6

leakage

Natural gas

distribution

fugitive

emissions

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

Electricity distribution losses

Electricity distribution losses are not like a water or gas leak; they are an inherent characteristic of electricity distribution networks.

Although we can measure these losses, and report their associated emissions based on New Zealand’s published electricity generation

emission factor, we can never fully remove them. As distribution losses are largely an inevitable by-product of electrical conduction,

Vector has elected to exclude emissions associated with such losses from our emissions reduction target. This allows our target to focus

on emissions that we can more readily manage.

27

StrategyRisksOpportunitiesReferences

and Appendix

Risk

management

Metrics

and targets

Governance

Metrics and targets (continued)
Table 3: GHG inventory by scope and category in tCO

2

e. FY2025 emissions highlighted in green indicate a reduction since the base

year or year in which emissions were first reported, whereas emissions in red show increases.

EMISSIONS CATEGORYFY2020FY2021FY2022FY2023FY2024FY2025

Total scopes 1, 2 and 31,712,4231,495,0521,129,8721,090,392985,712794,241

Scope 122,93318,45722,19318,33413,85010,449

Natural gas distribution fugitive emissions18,31313,50716,21813,3239,3797,887

SF₆ leakage5241,2632,0811,299924487

Other fugitive emissions


13113111812549103

Stationary combustion


3,3422,7553,0992,8382,7331,325

Vehicle fleet


623801677749766647

Scope 233,08734,35339,40242,77426,89739,476

Electricity consumption* (market based)


582731324184539

Electricity consumption (location based)


7307218081,117619644

Electricity distribution losses32,50533,62239,07842,59026,89239,437

Scope 31,656,4031,442,2421,068,2781,029,285944,966744,316

Purchased goods and services

Upstream-purchased natural gas

§

227,569170,44235,02618,7977,024–

Fuel used by field service providers6,4756,8226,4567,2357,1276,087

Upstream-purchased materials

and products


12,8846,70911,2549,87312,3089,435

Upstream-purchased other goods

and services


72,56867,39071,09476,76076,23979,224

Fuel and energy-related activities


1,0829791,1101,1141,065642

Upstream transportation

| |

–––––

Waste generated in operations


628353

Business travel


2947065230144202

Employee commuting and working

from home


859657729

Use of sold products

Distributed natural gas Auckland – Total772,265760,185711,336735,048706,355647,278

Sold natural gas – Auckland

§

151,603115,57857,14942,32219,193–

Other distributed natural gas – Auckland

§

620,662644,607654,188692,727687,162647,278

Sold natural gas – non-Auckland

§

562,567381,871231,127178,484133,260–

Shipped natural gas – non-Auckland

§

47,002––––

Investments

Bluecurrent700771809821703666

Biogenic carbon16213415013813164


Recalculated FY2020 to FY2024 to remove emissions relating to the sale of the Ongas LPG business. For details, see sections 1 and 4 of the

greenhouse gas emissions inventory report [1].

* Market-based method for electricity consumption. While location-based electricity emissions are also included in our inventory, the amounts

summed in table 3 include only market-based emissions, as these form part of our emissions reduction target.

§

Recalculated FY2022 to FY2024 to remove emissions relating to the sold Natural Gas Trading contracts. As a result of the closure of the business

from 1 July 2024, there are no FY2025 emissions relating to purchased, sold or shipped natural gas. For details, see sections 1 and 4 of the

greenhouse gas emissions inventory report [1].

| |

Recalculated FY2020 to FY2024 to remove emissions relating to the sale of the Ongas LPG business. For details, see sections 1 and 4 of the

greenhouse gas emissions inventory report [1]. Post the Ongas sale, emissions from third-party transportation for upstream-purchased

materials and products are immaterial and are therefore excluded from reporting.

28Vector climate-related disclosures 2025

GovernanceStrategyRisksOpportunitiesMetrics

and targets

References

and Appendix

Risk

management

Marginal carbon abatement cost curve
In FY2022 Vector developed a carbon abatement cost curve to

help measure and understand our emissions reduction target

(scope 1 and 2 excluding electricity distribution losses) and

actions available to us to contribute to reaching this target.

This work identifies the financial impact of potential carbon

reduction activity across scope 1 and 2 emissions, using an

internal carbon cost of $140 per tCO

2

e. This amount was chosen

as it aligned with the Climate Change Commission’s 2021

recommendations to government to meet its 2050 targets [11],

and is consistent with our internal carbon cost since FY2022.

We consider this internal carbon cost to still be appropriate.

Through this work, we identified emissions that could be reduced

while achieving cost savings for the group (those with negative

abatement cost) and others that were close to cost neutral (those

with bars close to $0/tCO

2

e/year), with the balance assessed as

being more complex to abate given the availability of current

alternatives. While the data in the cost curve is updated based

on the latest information, it presents forward-looking estimates

of emissions reduction potential, as opposed to actual emissions

results. The estimates are also conservative, which explains

how we have already met our emissions reduction target, even

though we have not yet completed all the actions on the curve.

The cost curve was updated in FY2025 to include the sale of the

Ongas business – this removed any emissions reduction activities

associated with Ongas, along with a removal of corresponding

historic emissions.

Changes in technology, project prices, emissions cost modelling,

new business innovation and a range of other factors may

alter the marginal carbon abatement cost curve in our

future disclosures.

Abatement

cost

$/tCO₂e/year

Abatement

potential

tCO₂e

Using mobile transformers as

opposed to diesel generators for

multi-day upgrades (2024)

Hybrid generator (in trial)

Transition remaining light

vehicle fleet to EV (2020 – 2027)

Transition vans and utes to

electric (when available)

3-month gas pipeline surveying (2027)

Vector headquarters to ‘6 Green Star’

building (2023)

Annual gas pipeline

surveying (2022)

6-month gas pipeline surveying (2024)

SF6

monitoring

Renewable-only

electricity (2023)

Uncosted emissions

Third-party

gas pipeline

damage

Public engagement on dial

before you dig (2023)

Completed

In progress

Planned

Other

fugitive

methane

Other

diesel

generation

$140/

tCO₂e

53.5%

Emissions

reduction

target

3-month high-pressure gas

pipeline surveying (2025)

Reducing unnecessary diesel

generation through process

optimisation (2021)

$0

-$1,000

-$2,000

$1,000

Metrics and targets (continued)

Figure 7: Vector’s marginal carbon cost abatement curve. The horizontal axis corresponds to Vector’s total FY2020 scope 1 and 2

emissions excluding electricity distribution losses. Each bar relates to a potential emissions reduction initiative where the thickness

of the bar details the amount of emission reductions estimated to be possible as a result of the initiatives. The vertical axis

represents the estimated cost, with negative values indicating estimated cost savings. Initiatives are ordered left to right, from

the most cost saving to the most expensive.

29

StrategyRisksOpportunitiesReferences

and Appendix

Risk

management

Metrics

and targets

Governance

CARBON ABATEMENT RISKDESCRIPTION
Damage to high-pressure pipelinesDamage to Vector’s high-pressure gas pipelines can release significant

quantities of CO₂e. For example, two leaks detected in FY2022 were

responsible for the release of over 3,000 tCO₂e. While we can reduce

emissions over time on average, these high-volatility events can cause a

sudden spike in emissions for that reporting year. In addition, there is a risk

that emissions from third-party damages (such as a contractor digging into

the pipe) remain high or increase, with limited influence from Vector’s side.

Long-term SF₆ assets on Vector’s networkMany of Vector’s SF₆ assets have a lifetime beyond 2030. It is challenging

to replace all these assets before FY2030, and leaks can be largely

unpredictable. Although we have installed some monitoring devices

that alert us of leaks quickly, there is still a risk that leaks could increase

and keep occurring. SF₆ has an emission factor 23,500 times that of

CO₂; therefore, even small leaks of SF₆ can have material impacts on our

emissions inventory.

Table 4: Key risks that may form a barrier to Vector achieving our emissions reduction target

Metrics and targets (continued)

Assets vulnerable to transition risks

Vector’s assets that are vulnerable to transition risks are

our gas-related businesses and investments. This table

highlights our key gas businesses that are potentially

vulnerable to transition risks and their associated carrying

value. We are currently disclosing 100% of the total

carrying value as this represents a conservative estimate

of potential impacts. This does not include the electricity

distribution network.

The sale of the Ongas business and the investment in

Liquigas, along with the wind-down and subsequent

closure of Vector’s Natural Gas Trading business has

reduced some of our exposure to transition risks. The

main drivers behind reduction in the carrying value of

the gas network were the goodwill impairments in both

FY2025 and FY2024.

30 JUNE 202330 JUNE 202430 JUNE 2025

Gas network607.0546.4497.7

Ongas71.868.0Sold

Natural Gas

Trading

13.3Ceased trading–

Liquigas (100%)72.774.7Sold

30Vector climate-related disclosures 2025

GovernanceStrategyRisksOpportunitiesMetrics

and targets

References

and Appendix

Risk

management

Assets vulnerable to physical risks
Vector has modelled electricity distribution network

assets vulnerable to flood impacts and landslip risk. With

respect to freshwater flooding, while we have highlighted

12 zone substations at potential risk of flooding, only

some assets within those zone substations are at risk of

damage. Flood modelling conducted in FY2023 did not

take into account the depth of water, and therefore was

insufficient at assessing the true asset exposure – for

this reason we chose not to disclose data for this year.

The more comprehensive flood-depth modelling was

conducted in FY2024 and updated in FY2025 to include

more infrequent high impact events. The decrease in the

number of zone substation assets exposed to flooding

risk in FY2025 is a result of the completion of the Wairau

zone substation flood mitigation project. The increase

in the number of power poles exposed to landslip risk is

because of more poles in Vector’s asset base. We are still

awaiting data from the completion of the Earth Sciences

NZ (formerly GNS) Sliding Lands project, which may

supersede this current analysis. We do not have landslip

data for the period before FY2024.

Business activities aligned with climate-related

opportunities and capital deployment towards

climate-related risks and opportunities

The values listed here represent the total carrying

value, revenue and capital expenditure invested in the

electricity distribution network.

As we did in FY2024, we are currently disclosing 100%

of the total capital expenditure of the entire electricity

distribution business as being aligned with our

climate-related opportunities. This is because there is

currently no clear method to identify specific capital

expenditure allocated to individual climate-related

risks and opportunities; for example, the specific

capital expenditure associated with managing risk 1

(inability to efficiently manage load to avoid network

congestion), risk 3 (weather impacts), and opportunity

2 (distributed energy resources). This is the same when

related to the amount of capital deployed towards

climate-related risks and opportunities in the reporting

period. Data in FY2024 was restated to align with

changes in the segment allocation in Vector’s annual

report, with electricity distribution now recognised as a

separate reporting segment (previously combined with

gas distribution).

The increase in annual gross capex on our electricity

distribution business between FY2023 and FY2025

reflects Auckland’s growth, electrification of transport

and industry, and new types of connections such as

data centres, making trend identification more complex.

Vector’s revenue is impacted by total energy delivered,

pricing adjustments, and pass-through recoverable costs.

ASSET TYPERISK TYPE

TOTAL

ASSETS

ANALYSED

POTENTIAL

NUMBER

OF ASSETS

EXPOSED IN

FY2024

POTENTIAL

NUMBER

OF ASSETS

EXPOSED IN

FY2025

Zone

substations*

Freshwater

flooding

1131312

Zone

substations

Coastal

inundation

11311

Power polesLandslip125,950

(in FY2024)

126,513

(in FY2025)

331351

ELECTRICITY

DISTRIBUTION

CARRYING

VALUE ($M)

REVENUE

INCLUDING

CONTRIBUTIONS

($M)

ANNUAL GROSS

CAPEX ($M)

FY20234,579.9834.5389.6

FY2024

(restated)

4,863.8872.6457.0

FY20255,151.3960.1432.0

Metrics and targets (continued)

* In Vector’s voluntary FY2023 TCFD report, we disclosed 119 zone substations

as being potentially vulnerable to freshwater flooding, as complex flood

modelling, and technical engineering investigation were still in development.

The improvements in methodology and data quality noted above mean that

we can disclose more meaningful information in relation to this metric for

FY2024 and FY2025.

31

StrategyRisksOpportunitiesReferences

and Appendix

Risk

management

Metrics

and targets

Governance

Electric vehicle uptake in Auckland
Related to risk 1:

inability to efficiently manage load to avoid network

congestion

Related to opportunity 1:

energy platforms

Related to opportunity 2:

distributed energy resources

Vector monitors electric vehicle uptake in Auckland to understand

their impact on the network and emerging charging behaviours.

Electric vehicle registrations peaked in December 2023. The

uptake of electric vehicles slowed after December 2023 because

of additional costs being added to electric vehicle use (road

user charges and rebate removals), combined with a broader

economic slowdown.

0

Cumulative electric vehicles in Auckland

Number of vehicles

201320142015201620172018

2019202020212022202320242025

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

60,000

50,000

Actual gas volumes

Related to risk 2:

gas transition

Gas distribution volumes in Auckland have been trending

down since 2019. Note that COVID impacts have caused

a decrease in activity in FY2022 also. There has been a

loss of multiple large industrial loads due to business

closures or relocation from Auckland, along with a reduced

consumption per connection. The reduced consumption

can be attributed to numerous factors, including

decarbonisation, reduction in business output, and derisking

operations from supply side risk. Residential gas use per

household has been decreasing as well.

Total gas connections

Related to risk 2:

gas transition

Overall we have observed a continued slowdown in all segments

for new connections over recent years, and the connections

we are getting are typically smaller on average than historical

averages. Forecasts in our gas asset management plan (linked

to a disorderly decarbonisation scenario) show a decline in net

connections to the gas network from FY2026, and the overall

gas volume continuing to decline, but at a faster rate than in

prior years.

Gas distribution volume in Auckland

FY13FY14FY15FY16FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25

11

11.5

12

12.5

13

13.5

14.5

15

14

PJ

Total commercial gas connections

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

4,000

4,500

IndustrialSmall and Medium Enterprise

June 2015

June 2016

June 2017

June 2018

June 2019

June 2020

June 2021

June 2022

June 2023

June 2025

June 2024

Numb er of connections

Total residential gas connections

85,000

90,000

95,000

100,000

105,000

110,000

115,000

June 2015

June 2016

June 2017

June 2018

June 2019

June 2020

June 2021

June 2022

June 2023

June 2024

June 2025

Residential

Numb er of connections

Metrics and targets (continued)

32Vector climate-related disclosures 2025

GovernanceStrategyRisksOpportunitiesMetrics

and targets

References

and Appendix

Risk

management

RY2020RY2021RY2022RY2023RY2024RY2025
New capacity connected (MVA)1.84.84.1151210

Number of new connections219901582179916531106

Distributed generation uptake in Auckland

Related to risk 1:

inability to efficiently manage load to avoid network

congestion

Related to opportunity 1:

energy platforms

Related to opportunity 2:

distributed energy resources

NORMALISED UNPLANNED

SAIDI/SAIFI

RY2023RY2024RY2025REGULATORY LIMIT

6

SAIDI118.798.476.56104.83

Major event SAIDI292.314.116.3–

SAIFI1.191.130.901.337

Vector registers distributed generation – for example photovoltaic

solar-uptake in the Auckland region. This can be used to

understand the uptake of this type of distributed energy resource

within Auckland. We have disclosed the metrics by regulatory year,

which ends 31 March 2025, for simplicity and consistency with our

wider disclosures.

We have noted a 5.5-fold increase in capacity of distributed

generation connected in RY2025 compared to RY2020. The metric

refers to the electricity distribution network regulatory year, which

is from 1 April to 31 March. We have, however, noticed that both the

capacity and number of connections appear to have decreased

from RY2023.

Metrics and targets (continued)

Industry-based metrics/targets:

Electrical power outages

Related to risk 3:

increase in extreme weather events

SAIDI and SAIFI are two measures that the Commerce

Commission uses to monitor a reliable standard of service to

customers. We have disclosed the metrics in regulatory year,

which ends 31 March 2025, for simplicity and consistency with our

wider disclosures. SAIDI and SAIFI incorporate all causes of power

outages, including non-weather-related outages such as car

accidents on power lines, and asset failure. However, an increase

in the frequency of high wind-speeds, flood events, and high

temperature days can still contribute to an increase in SAIDI and

SAIFI. These two metrics are defined as:

SAIDI (system average interruption duration index) – Average

outage duration for each customer served over the course of a

regulatory year.

SAIFI (system average interruption frequency index) – Average

number of interruptions per customer per regulatory year.

Vector seeks to be below the regulatory limits set at 104.83 and

1.337 for SAIDI and SAIFI respectively.

6

Major event SAIDI – Days of severe impacts that breach the

SAIDI unplanned boundary value of 4.83 SAIDI minutes

6

. While

major event SAIDI does not have a target, it is a metric that can

indicate an increase in extreme weather events, such as cyclones.

This is noted in the significant increase in major event SAIDI in

the 2023 regulatory year, which included Cyclone Gabrielle and

the Auckland Anniversary Floods. There are no targets for major

event SAIDI.

We have maintained our performance under the regulatory limit

in RY2025.

6. Note that from 1 April 2025, Vector has moved to a new regulatory period (DPP4), where the limits have changed to 110.07 and 1.40 for SAIDI and

SAIFI respectively. The major event SAIDI unplanned boundary value has also increased to 5.79 minutes. This will impact our FY2026 disclosure.

33

StrategyRisksOpportunitiesReferences

and Appendix

Risk

management

Metrics

and targets

Governance

Remuneration: Senior staff performance goals
Remuneration targets impact the overall short-term incentive

payments to the executive team members and their eligible

direct reports. The targets are designed and agreed by the

executive team, ensuring alignment with our corporate strategy,

and approved by Vector’s people and remuneration board

committee and the full board. All payments are subject to full

board approval and discretion.

Vector’s emissions reduction goals were designed to track

towards our FY2030 emissions reduction target. In FY2023 an

additional goal to quantify supply chain emissions was added

to support the development of our scope 3 greenhouse gas

emissions inventory.

The resilience target has remained constant to prevent

exceeding the regulatory limits of SAIDI/SAIFI. In FY2025 an

additional qualitative resilience goal was set to uplift Vector’s

approach to climate-change resilience planning.

FY2023FY2024FY2025

% contribution to short-term incentive

goals

7

5 – 30%10% - 30%0% - 22%

Criteria

Emission reduction from FY2020

against scope 1 and 2 emissions

(excluding electricity line losses)

16.1% reduction

A further qualitative

emissions accounting

goal which involves

the development of a

methodology for calculating

supply chain scope 3

emissions

21.4% reduction39.2% reduction

ResilienceNot exceeding the regulatory

limits of 104.83 SAIDI, and

1.337 SAIFI

Not exceeding the regulatory

limits of 104.83 SAIDI, and

1.337 SAIFI

Not exceeding the regulatory

limits of 104.83 SAIDI, and

1.337 SAIFI

And a further qualitative

climate change resilience

goal which includes:

1) Community engagement

with customers and

communities vulnerable

8


to climate-change impacts

2) Development of a model/

framework to calculate

the trade-off between

investment options and

resilience outcomes

3) Engagement with

government and regulators

to propose financial and

investment criteria on how

Vector should consider

resilience investment.

Metrics and targets (continued)

7. The range is due to weighting differences between business units. Some business units have zero weighting to some criteria when they do not

have reasonable influence over them.

8. We used historic customer outage data during major storm events to define ‘vulnerability’.

34Vector climate-related disclosures 2025

GovernanceStrategyRisksOpportunitiesMetrics

and targets

References

and Appendix

Risk

management

Metrics and targets (continued)
Table 5: NZCS cross-referenced to Vector’s greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions inventory report. The sections referenced below form

part of the CRD.

STANDARDDETAILSLOCATION OF DISCLOSURE IN

GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS

INVENTORY REPORT

NZCS 1 (24)GHG emissions - An entity must disclose the following in

relation to its GHG emissions:

See below

NZCS 1 (24)(a)A statement describing the standard or standards that its

GHG emissions have been measured in accordance with.

Introduction, page 2

NZCS 1 (24)(b)The GHG emissions consolidation approach used: equity

share, financial control, or operational control.

Organisational boundaries, page 5

NZCS 1 (24)(c)The source of emission factors and the global warming

potential (GWP) rates used or a reference to the GWP source.

Table 4, pages 8 - 10

NZCS 1 (24)(d)A summary of specific exclusions of sources, including

facilities, operations or assets with a justification for their

exclusion.

Table 3, page 6

NZCS 3 (52)An entity must provide a description of the methods and

assumptions used to calculate or estimate GHG emissions,

and the limitations of those methods. When choices between

different methods are allowed, or entity-specific methods

are used, an entity must disclose the methods used and the

rationale for doing so.

Table 4, pages 8 - 10, and data collection

and quantification, pages 11 and 12

NZCS 3 (53)An entity must describe uncertainties relevant to the entity’s

quantification of its GHG emissions, including the effects of

these uncertainties on the GHG emissions disclosures.

Table 4, pages 8 - 10

NZCS 3 (54)An entity must provide an explanation for any base year GHG

emissions restatements.

GHG emissions calculation and results,

page 13

35

StrategyRisksOpportunitiesReferences

and Appendix

Risk

management

Metrics

and targets

Governance

1
Vector’s annual reports. Accessed 13 August 2025 <https://www.vector.co.nz/investors/reports>

2

Vector’s governance. Accessed 8 August 2025 <https://www.vector.co.nz/investors/governance>

3

Vector Limited. 2025. Vector Electricity Asset Management Plan. Accessed 8 August 2025 <https://www.vector.co.nz/about-us/

regulatory/disclosures-electricity/asset-management-plan>

4

Vector Limited. 2025. Vector Gas Asset Management Plan. Accessed 8 August 2025 <https://www.vector.co.nz/about-us/

regulatory/disclosures-gas/gas-asset-management>

5

IPCC, 2021: Summary for Policymakers. In: Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group

I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Masson-Delmotte, V, Zhai P, Pirani A,

Connors S L, Péan C, Berger S, Caud N, Chen Y, Goldfarb L, Gomis M I, Huang M, Leitzell K, Lonnoy E, Matthews J B R, Maycock T

K, Waterfield T, Yelekçi O, Yu R and Zhou B (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY,

USA, pp 3−32, doi:10.1017/9781009157896.001.

6

Network for Greening the Financial System. NGFS Scenarios. Accessed 8 August 2025 <https://www.ngfs.net/ngfs-scenarios-

portal/>

7

Climate Change Commission. 2023 Draft advice to inform the strategic direction of the Government’s second emission

reduction plan. Accessed 8 August 2025 <https://www.climatecommission.govt.nz/public/Advice-to-govt-docs/ERP2/draft-erp2/

CCC4940_Draft-ERP-Advice-2023-P02-V02-web.pdf>

8

Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment. 2025. Petroleum reserves data. Accessed 13 August 2025 <https://www.mbie.

govt.nz/building-and-energy/energy-and-natural-resources/energy-statistics-and-modelling/energy-statistics/petroleum-

reserves-data>

9

Vector Limited. 2023. Managing the gas transition - options preserving solutions to manage consumer risks from gas asset

stranding. Accessed 8 August 2025 <https://blob-static.vector.co.nz/blob/vector/media/vector-2024/vector-2023-managing-the-

gas-transition.pdf>

10

Gas Infrastructure Future Working Group. 2023. Gas Transition Analysis Paper. Accessed 8 August 2025 <https://comcom.govt.

nz/__data/assets/pdf_file/0012/323130/Gas-Infrastructure-Working-Group-GIFWG-Attachment_-Gas-Transition-Analysis-Paper-13-

June-2023-Submission-on-IM-Review-2023-Draft-Decisions-19-July-2023.pdf>

11

Climate Change Commission. 2021. Ināia tonu nei: a low emissions future for Aotearoa. Accessed 8 August 2025

<https://www.climatecommission.govt.nz/public/Inaia-tonu-nei-a-low-emissions-future-for-Aotearoa/Inaia-tonu-nei-a-low-

emissions-future-for-Aotearoa.pdf>

References

36Vector climate-related disclosures 2025

GovernanceStrategyRisksOpportunitiesMetrics

and targets

References

and Appendix

Risk

management

Appendix 1: KPMG’s Limited Assurance Report
© 2025 KPMG, a New Zealand Partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organization of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited,

a private English company limited by guarantee. All rights reserved.

Document classification: KPMG Public

Independent Limited Assurance

Report to Vector Limited

Conclusion

Our limited assurance conclusion has been formed on the basis of the matters outlined in this report.

Based on our limited assurance engagement, which is not a reasonable assurance engagement or an audit,

nothing has come to our attention that would lead us to believe that, in all material respects, the Climate-

related Disclosures of Vector Limited for the year ended 30 June 2025 are not fairly presented and prepared

in accordance with the Aotearoa New Zealand Climate Standards issued by the External Reporting Board.

Information subject to assurance

We have performed an engagement to provide limited assurance in relation to Vector Limited’s Climate-related

Disclosures for the period 1 July 2024 to 30 June 2025.

The Climate-related Disclosures includes the following:

‒ Statement of Compliance on page 2;

‒ Governance related disclosures on pages 7 to 10;

‒ Strategy related disclosures on pages 11 to 17;

‒ Risk Management related disclosures on pages 18 to 25; and

‒ Metrics and Targets related disclosures on pages 26 to 35.

The Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, additional required disclosures of those

emissions and the related method, assumptions and estimation uncertainty disclosures (GHG Disclosures) are

included within Vectors Limited’s Climate-related Disclosures as follows:

‒ Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 GHG emissions included in the Metrics and Targets related disclosures

in Table 3 on page 28; and

‒ Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 additional required disclosures and gross greenhouse gas emissions

methods, assumptions and estimation uncertainty disclosures contained within the Greenhouse Gas

Emissions Inventory report, as outlined in Table 5 on page 35.

Our assurance engagement does not extend to any other information included, or referred to, in the Vector

Climate-related disclosures (other information). We have not performed any procedures with respect to the

other information.

Criteria

The criteria used as the basis of the Company’s Climate-related Disclosures is the Aotearoa New Zealand

Climate Standards (NZCS):

37

StrategyRisksOpportunitiesMetrics

and targets

Risk

management

References

and Appendix

Governance




• NZCS 1 Climate Related Disclosures;

• NZCS 2 Adoption of Aotearoa New Zealand Climate Standards; and

• NZCS 3 General Requirements for Climate-related Disclosures.


The Scope 1, 2 and 3 Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and the GHG related disclosures required under NZCS

Greenhouse Gas emissions Disclosures, have been measured in accordance with the World Resources Institute

and World Business Council for Sustainable Development’s Greenhouse Gas Protocol standards and guidance:

• The Greenhouse Gas Protocol: A Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard (revised edition);

• The Greenhouse Gas Protocol: GHG Protocol Scope 2 Guidance: An amendment to the GHG Protocol

Corporate Standard; and

• The Greenhouse Gas Protocol: Corporate Value Chain (Scope 3) Accounting and Reporting Standard

As a result, this report may not be suitable for another purpose.

Standards we followed

We conducted our limited assurance engagement on the Climate-related Disclosures in accordance with

International Standard on Assurance engagements (New Zealand) 3000 (Revised) Assurance Engagements

Other Than Audits or Reviews of Historical Financial Information) (ISAE (NZ) 3000 (Revised) issued by the New

Zealand Auditing and Assurance Standards Board.

GHG emissions

We conducted our limited assurance engagement on the Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions and the GHG-related

disclosures required under NZCS in accordance with New Zealand Standard on Assurance Engagements 1 (NZ

SAE 1) Assurance Engagements over Greenhouse Gas Emissions Disclosures and International Standard on

Assurance Engagements (New Zealand) 3410 Assurance Engagements on Greenhouse Gas Statements (ISAE

(NZ) 3410) issued by the New Zealand Auditing and Assurance Standards Board.

We believe that the evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our conclusion.

Our responsibilities under ISAE (NZ) 3000 (Revised), NZ SAE 1 and ISAE (NZ) 3410 are further described in the

‘Our responsibility’ section of our report.

How to interpret limited assurance and material misstatement

A limited assurance engagement is substantially less in scope than a reasonable assurance engagement in

relation to both the risk assessment procedures, including an understanding of internal control, and the

procedures performed in response to the assessed risks.

Misstatements, including omissions, within the Climate-related disclosures are considered material if, individually

or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the relevant decisions of the intended users

taken on the basis of the Climate-related disclosures.

Inherent limitations

As noted in the Climate-related Disclosures page 3, forward-looking statements are subject to a number of

uncertainties and factors because of associated limitations, evolving methodology and availability of data.

As noted in the Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory Report in Table 4 on pages 8 to 10, GHG quantification is

subject to inherent uncertainty because of incomplete scientific knowledge used to determine emission factors

and the values needed to combine emissions of different gases.

38Vector climate-related disclosures 2025

GovernanceStrategyRisksOpportunitiesMetrics

and targets

References

and Appendix

Risk

management




Use of this assurance report

Our report is made solely for Vector Limited. Our assurance work has been undertaken so that we might state to

Vector Limited those matters we are required to state to them in the assurance report and for no other purpose.

Our report should not be regarded as suitable to be used or relied on by anyone other than Vector Limited for

any purpose or in any context. Any other person who obtains access to our report or a copy thereof and chooses

to rely on our report (or any part thereof) will do so at its own risk.

To the fullest extent permitted by law, none of KPMG, any entities directly or indirectly controlled by KPMG, or

any of their respective members or employees accept or assume any responsibility and deny all liability to

anyone other than Vector Limited for our work, for this independent assurance report, and/or for the opinions or

conclusions we have reached.

Our conclusion is not modified in respect of this matter.

Vector Limited’s responsibility for the Climate-related Disclosures

The Directors of Vector Limited are responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of the Climate-related

Disclosures in accordance with the criteria. This responsibility includes the design, implementation and

maintenance of such internal control as Directors determine is relevant to enable the preparation of the Climate-

related Disclosures that are free from material misstatement whether due to fraud or error.

The Directors of Vector Limited are also responsible for selecting or developing suitable criteria for preparing the

GHG disclosures and appropriately referring to or describing the criteria used.

Our responsibility

We have responsibility for:

• planning and performing the engagement to obtain limited assurance about whether the Climate-related

Disclosures are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error;

• forming an independent conclusion based on the procedures we have performed and the evidence we

have obtained; and

• reporting our conclusion to Vector Limited.

Summary of the work we performed as the basis for our conclusion

A limited assurance engagement performed in accordance with the Standard involves assessing the suitability in

the circumstances of Vector Limited’s use of the criteria as the basis for the preparation of the Climate-related

Disclosures, assessing the risks of material misstatement of the Climate-related Disclosures whether due to fraud

or error, responding to the assessed risks as necessary in the circumstances, and evaluating the overall

presentation of the Climate-related Disclosures.

We exercised professional judgement and maintained professional scepticism throughout the engagement. We

designed and performed our procedures to obtain evidence about the Climate-related Disclosures that is

sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our conclusion.

Our procedures selected depended on the understanding of the Climate-related Disclosures that is sufficient and

appropriate to provide a basis for our conclusion. The procedures we performed were based on our professional

judgment and included inquiries, observation of processes performed, inspection of documents, analytical

procedures, evaluating the appropriateness of quantification methods and reporting policies, and agreeing or

reconciling with underlying records.

In undertaking limited assurance on the Climate-related Disclosures the procedures we primarily performed

were:

39

StrategyRisksOpportunitiesMetrics

and targets

Risk

management

References

and Appendix

Governance




Climate-related Disclosures

• obtained, through inquiries, an understanding of Vector Limited’s control environment, processes and

information systems relevant to the preparation of the Climate-related Disclosures. We did not evaluate

the design of particular control activities, or obtain evidence about their implementation;

• for selected disclosures obtained documentation or agreed to source, either in total or on a sample

basis, to assess whether the disclosure was fairly presented and evidence available which substantiated

the disclosure;

• obtained, through inquiries and corroborating evidence, an understanding of the underlying process

undertaken by Vector Limited to identify material climate-related risks and opportunities and how this is

consistent with the qualitative disclosures; and

• evaluated the Climate-related Disclosures against the NZCS disclosure requirements and the fair

presentation principles.

GHG disclosures

• obtained, through inquiries and walkthroughs, an understanding of Vector Limited’s control environment,

processes and information systems relevant to the preparation of the GHG disclosures;

• evaluated whether Vector Limited’s methods for developing estimates are appropriate and had been

consistently applied. Our procedures did not include testing the data on which the estimates are based

or separately developing our own estimates against which to evaluate Vector Limited’s estimates;

• recalculated the emissions for a limited number of items;

• performed analytical procedures on particular emission categories by comparing the expected GHGs

emitted to actual GHGs emitted and made inquiries of management to obtain explanations for any

significant differences we identified; and

• considered the presentation and disclosure of the GHG disclosures against the NZCS disclosure

requirements.

The procedures performed in a limited assurance engagement vary in nature and timing from, and are less in

extent than for a reasonable assurance engagement. Consequently, the level of assurance obtained in a limited

assurance engagement is substantially lower than the assurance that would have been obtained had a

reasonable assurance engagement been performed.

Our independence and quality management

This assurance engagement was undertaken

We have complied with the independence and other ethical requirements of Professional and Ethical Standard 1

International Code of Ethics for Assurance Practitioners (including International Independence Standards) (New

Zealand) (PES 1) issued by the New Zealand Auditing and Assurance Standards Board, which is founded on

fundamental principles of integrity, objectivity, professional competence and due care, confidentiality and

professional behaviour.

The firm applies Professional and Ethical Standard 3 Quality Management for Firms that Perform Audits or

Reviews of Financial Statements, or Other Assurance or Related Services Engagements (PES 3), which requires

the firm to design, implement and operate a system of quality control including policies or procedures regarding

compliance with ethical requirements, professional standards and applicable legal and regulatory requirements.

We have also complied with Professional and Ethical Standard 4 Engagement Quality Reviews (PES 4) which

deals with the appointment and eligibility of the engagement quality reviewer and the engagement quality

reviewer’s responsibilities relating to the performance and documentation of an engagement quality review.

Our firm has also provided regulatory assurance services, other assurance services, and compliance services in

relation to R&D tax credits services to Vector Limited. Subject to certain restrictions, partners and employees of

our firm may also deal with Vector Limited on normal terms within the ordinary course of trading activities of the

business of Vector Limited. These matters have not impaired our independence as assurance providers of

Vector Limited for this engagement. The firm has no other relationship with, or interest in, Vector Limited.

40Vector climate-related disclosures 2025

GovernanceStrategyRisksOpportunitiesMetrics

and targets

References

and Appendix

Risk

management

As we are engaged to form an independent conclusion on the Climate-related Disclosures prepared by Vector
Limited, we are not permitted to be involved in the preparation of the Climate-related Disclosures as doing so

may compromise our i ndependence.

The engagement partner on the assurance engagement resulting in this independent assurance report is Matt

Diprose.


KPMG

Auckland

22 August 2025

41

StrategyRisksOpportunitiesMetrics

and targets

Risk

management

References

and Appendix

Governance

VECTOR.CO.NZ

---

GREENHOUSE
GAS EMISSIONS

INVENTORY

REPORT 2025

2Vector GHG Emissions Inventory Report FY2025
Introduction

This report is for the Vector Limited Group (Vector or the group).

The group comprises Vector Limited and its subsidiaries. Vector

Limited is NZX listed and 75.1% owned by Entrust, a private

community trust. A list of all subsidiaries can be found in

appendix 1.

The purpose of this report is to transparently disclose Vector’s

greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions: how they are quantified, how

Vector is tracking towards its reduction target and steps planned

to further reduce GHG emissions.

The inventory covered in this report is a complete and accurate

quantification of the amount of GHG emissions that can be

attributed to Vector’s operations within the declared boundary

and scope for the specified reporting period. Any exclusions from

reporting are disclosed and justified.

This report has been prepared in accordance with the

Greenhouse Gas Protocol:

‒A Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard [1]

(GHG Protocol Standard);

‒The Greenhouse Gas Protocol: Scope 2 Guidance [2];

‒The Greenhouse Gas Protocol: Corporate Value Chain

(Scope 3) Accounting and Reporting Standard [3]

(GHG Protocol Value Chain Standard); and

‒Other related technical guidance issued under the

GHG Protocol Standards.

A summary of emissions can be found in both Vector’s annual

report 2025 and climate-related disclosures 2025.

Statement of intent

Vector reports on its GHG emissions on an annual basis and has

been calculating its carbon footprint since 2017. The intended

users of this report are all interested stakeholders, including

shareholders, investors, regulators, communities, employees,

customers and contractors. The GHG inventory has been subject

to limited assurance by KPMG; see appendix 3.

Reporting period covered

This GHG inventory report covers Vector’s financial year 1 July 2024

to 30 June 2025 (FY2025).

Disclaimer

This report is not earnings guidance or financial advice for

investors. Rather, this report provides a summary of Vector’s

GHG emissions inventory. The report reflects Vector’s current

understanding as at 22 August 2025, in respect of the 12 months

ended 30 June 2025.

GHG emissions calculations use data and methodologies that

are developing. Vector acknowledges that the understanding of

climate change and the inputs to assist with this understanding

are constantly evolving.

This report contains forward-looking statements (including

targets and assumptions) that may not evolve as predicted.

Vector (including its directors, officers and employees) does not:

‒Represent that the statements, intentions and/or opinions

contained in this report will not change, or will remain correct

after publishing this report, or

‒Promise to revise or update those statements and opinions

if events or circumstances change or unanticipated events

happen after publishing this report.

The GHG emissions data described in this report, and Vector’s

strategies to achieve its GHG emissions target, may not

eventuate or may be more or less significant than anticipated.

There are many factors that could cause Vector’s actual results,

performance or achievement of climate-related targets to

differ materially from that described, including economic and

technological viability, and climatic, government, consumer

and market factors outside of Vector’s control. Vector gives no

representation, warranty or assurance that actual outcomes or

performance will not materially differ from the forward-looking

statements.

To the maximum extent possible under New Zealand law, Vector

(including its directors, officers and employees) does not accept

and expressly disclaims any liability whatsoever for any direct,

indirect or consequential loss or damage occasioned from any

use or inability to use the information contained in this report,

whether directly or indirectly resulting from inaccuracies, defects,

errors, omissions, out-of-date information or otherwise.

We recommend you seek independent advice before acting or

relying on any information in this report. Vector reserves the right

to revise statements made in, or its strategy or business activities

described in, this report, without notice.

This disclaimer should be read along with other methodologies,

assumptions and uncertainties and limitations contained in

this report, as well as in Vector’s climate-related disclosures for

FY2025. All amounts disclosed in this report are estimates and are

in New Zealand dollars, unless context otherwise requires.

This report is not an offer document and does not constitute an

offer or invitation or investment recommendation to distribute

or purchase securities, shares, or other interests. Nothing in this

report should be interpreted as capital growth, earnings or any

other legal, financial tax or other advice or guidance. For detailed

information on our financial performance, please refer to our

annual report, available at vector.co.nz/investors/reports.

Summary of

emissions

Organisational

boundaries

Operational

boundaries

Data collection

and quantification

References

and Appendix

GHG emissions

calculation

and results

GHG emissions

reductions

3
Summary of emissions

In FY2025, Vector’s greenhouse gas emissions across scopes 1, 2 and 3 amount to 794,241 tCO₂e. This is a 54% reduction from FY2020,

Vector’s base year.

Table 1: GHG inventory by scope and category in tCO₂e. FY2025 emissions highlighted in green indicate a reduction since the base

year or the year in which emissions were first reported, whereas emissions in red show increases.

EMISSIONS CATEGORYFY2020FY2021FY2022FY2023FY2024FY2025

Total scopes 1, 2 and 31,712,4231,495,0521,129,8721,090,392985,712794,241

Scope 122,93318,45722,19318,33413,85010,449

Natural gas distribution fugitive emissions18,31313,50716,21813,3239,3797,887

SF₆ leakage5241,2632,0811,299924487

Other fugitive emissions


13113111812549103

Stationary combustion


3,3422,7553,0992,8382,7331,325

Vehicle fleet


623801677749766647

Scope 233,08734,35339,40242,77426,89739,476

Electricity consumption* (market based)


582731324184539

Electricity consumption (location based)


7307218081,117619644

Electricity distribution losses32,50533,62239,07842,59026,89239,437

Scope 31,656,4031,442,2421,068,2781,029,285944,966744,316

Purchased goods and services

Upstream-purchased natural gas

§

227,569170,44235,02618,7977,024–

Fuel used by field service providers6,4756,8226,4567,2357,1276,087

Upstream-purchased materials

and products


12,8846,70911,2549,87312,3089,435

Upstream-purchased other goods

and services


72,56867,39071,09476,76076,23979,224

Fuel and energy-related activities


1,0829791,1101,1141,065642

Upstream transportation

| |

–––––

Waste generated in operations


628353

Business travel


2947065230144202

Employee commuting and working

from home


859657729

Use of sold products

Distributed natural gas Auckland – Total772,265760,185711,336735,048706,355647,278

Sold natural gas – Auckland

§

151,603115,57857,14942,32219,193–

Other distributed natural gas – Auckland

§

620,662644,607654,188692,727687,162647,278

Sold natural gas – non-Auckland

§

562,567381,871231,127178,484133,260–

Shipped natural gas – non-Auckland

§

47,002––––

Investments

Bluecurrent700771809821703666

Biogenic carbon16213415013813164


Recalculated FY2020 to FY2024 to remove emissions relating to the sale of the Ongas LPG business. For details, see sections 1 and 4.

* Market-based method for electricity consumption. While location-based electricity emissions are also included in our inventory, the amounts

summed in table 1 include only market-based emissions, as these form part of our emissions reduction target.

§

Recalculated FY2022 to FY2024 to remove emissions relating to the sold Natural Gas Trading contracts. As a result of the closure of the business

from 1 July 2024, there are no FY2025 emissions relating to purchased, sold or shipped natural gas. For details, see sections 1 and 4.

| |

Recalculated FY2020 to FY2024 to remove emissions relating to the sale of the Ongas LPG business. For details, see sections 1 and 4. Post

the Ongas sale, emissions from third-party transportation for upstream-purchased materials and products are immaterial and are therefore

excluded from reporting.

Organisational

boundaries

Operational

boundaries

Data collection

and quantification

References

and Appendix

GHG emissions

calculation

and results

GHG emissions

reductions

Summary of

emissions

4Vector GHG Emissions Inventory Report FY2025
Glossary of terms

Table 2: Definition and glossary of terms

TERMDESCRIPTION

Carbon footprintVector’s greenhouse gas emissions covered by the Kyoto Protocol, calculated in tonnes of carbon dioxide

equivalent (tCO₂e)

CO₂Carbon dioxide

CRDClimate-related disclosures that comply with Aotearoa New Zealand Climate Standards

DEFRADepartment of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (UK)

EmissionsGreenhouse gas emissions

EPDEnvironmental product declaration

FSPField service provider

FYFinancial year – 1 July to 30 June

GHGGreenhouse gas

For the purposes of this report, GHGs are the seven gases listed in the Kyoto Protocol. These are currently:

carbon dioxide (CO₂), methane (CH₄), nitrous oxide (N₂O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs),

sulphur hexafluoride (SF₆), and nitrogen trifluoride (NF₃).

GHG ProtocolThe Greenhouse Gas Protocol, a partnership between the World Resources Institute (WRI) and the World

Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). The GHG Protocol develops standards and guidance,

such as the Corporate Standard and the Corporate Value Chain (scope 3) Standard, both used as guidance for

this report.

GWPGlobal warming potential, a measure of how much energy the emissions of 1 tonne of a greenhouse gas will

absorb over a given period, relative to the emissions of 1 tonne of carbon dioxide (CO₂)

GXPGrid exit point

HVACHeating, ventilation and air conditioning

ICPInstallation control point

IPCC (AR5)Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Fifth Assessment Report)

LPGLiquefied petroleum gas – a mixture of hydrocarbons, consisting primarily of propane and butane. The

higher density – in contrast to natural gas – allows it to be easily compressed to liquid, and is therefore largely

distributed in bottles.

MfEMinistry for the Environment (New Zealand)

NZNew Zealand

NZUNew Zealand units

NZECSNew Zealand energy certificate scheme

NZ ETSNew Zealand emissions trading scheme

OGMPOil and Gas Methane Partnership

QICInvestment vehicles managed and advised by Queensland Investment Corporation

SBTiScience Based Targets initiative

SELMAStreet evaluation laser methane assessment

SF₆Sulphur hexafluoride – a gas used to electrically insulate electrical assets. SF₆ has a global warming potential

of 23,500 times that of CO₂.

T&DTransmission and distribution

tCO₂eTonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent

TPDThird-party damages

VectorVector Limited Group

WTTWell-to-tank

Summary of emissions (continued)

Organisational

boundaries

Operational

boundaries

Data collection

and quantification

References

and Appendix

GHG emissions

calculation

and results

GHG emissions

reductions

Summary of

emissions

5
Description of Vector

Vector is an innovative New Zealand energy company, delivering

energy and communication services to more than 630,000

residential and commercial customers across New Zealand.

The operations of the group are electricity and gas distribution,

telecommunications and new energy solutions. For further

information, visit vector.co.nz.

Organisational boundaries

Vector uses the operational control approach, as defined by

the GHG Protocol Standard. This approach was chosen as it

allows a focus on emissions over which the group has greatest

control, and thereby can influence most with emissions

reduction measures.

For carbon accounting purposes, emissions are categorised

into the business areas as outlined in figure 1. A detailed list

of all subsidiaries and shareholdings under Vector and their

relevance for carbon accounting can be found in appendix 1.

Treatment of investments

For carbon accounting purposes, Vector has set a threshold

for equity investments of 20%, unless significant influence can

be evidenced.

Bluecurrent (50%)

Previously fully owned by Vector as Vector Metering, Bluecurrent

manages advanced electricity and gas meters across

New Zealand and Australia. Vector has ceased operational

control of Bluecurrent and accounts for a proportional share

of Bluecurrent's scope 1 and 2 emissions under scope 3 –

category 15. Bluecurrent is jointly owned by QIC and Vector.

1. Organisational boundaries

Treatment of business closures

Natural Gas Trading

Vector’s Natural Gas Trading business has been on a wind-

down since FY2020, whereby contracts for natural gas sales

were not renewed. This has led to a year-on-year reduction in

gas sales-related scope 3 emissions, under category 11 – use of

sold products and category 1 – purchased natural gas. On 1 July

2024, Vector completed the sale of the remaining contracts in

the natural gas business, and shut down the business from then

on. As the remaining contracts were sold to a third party, for

FY2025 reporting, Vector’s GHG inventory for FY2022 to FY2024

has been rebased to remove the emissions associated with these

sold contracts. There is no impact on years before FY2022 as the

earliest start date of the contracts sold was 1 July 2021.

Treatment of business/investment sales

On Gas Limited and Liquigas Limited

On 25 July 2024, Vector signed a conditional agreement for the

sale of the Ongas LPG business, and the 60.25% shareholding in

Liquigas Limited. The sale was completed on 31 January 2025.

Emissions created by these businesses have been removed for

years FY2020 onwards.

mPrest Systems Limited (8.1%)

On 22 August 2024, Vector sold its 8.1% shareholding in mPrest

Systems (2003) Limited.

No recalculation is required as the shareholding in mPrest was

excluded from Vector’s emissions inventory as it was below

Vector’s materiality threshold for investments.

HRV

Vector announced the sale of HRV after balance date, on 1 August

2025. No adjustment to the FY2025 GHG emissions inventory

report is required as a result of this event, however the impact will

be considered for future disclosures.

Figure 1: Vector Limited’s businesses per organisational boundaries

Owns and operates the

electricity network within

the wider Auckland region.

This consists of more than

19,000 km of electricity

lines, delivering power to

over 630,000 homes and

businesses.

Owns and operates the

gas distribution network in

the wider Auckland region,

supplying gas to over 120,000

installed connection points,

through 4,670 km of mains

pipelines, distributing around

12 petajoules (PJ) of gas

per year.

Other includes

telecommunications,

digital services, energy

solution services and

corporate operations.

Vector Limited

Electricity distributionGas distributionOther

Summary of

emissions

Operational

boundaries

Data collection

and quantification

References

and Appendix

GHG emissions

calculation

and results

GHG emissions

reductions

Organisational

boundaries

6Vector GHG Emissions Inventory Report FY2025
2. Operational boundaries

Operational boundaries

The GHG Protocol Standard splits emissions into three categories:

Scope 1 – Emissions Vector directly controls, such as vehicle fleet

fuel combustion, diesel backup generators, natural gas fugitive

emissions, and SF₆ leaks.

Scope 2 – Vector’s consumption of purchased electricity, and

electricity distribution losses along the network.

Scope 3 – All other indirect value chain emissions, such as

customer energy consumption and supply chain emissions.

The GHG Protocol Value Chain Standard splits scope 3 emissions

into 15 categories. To gain a more comprehensive understanding

of our emissions, in FY2020 Vector commissioned an external

review of our carbon accounting methodology. This included a

scope 3 screening exercise to identify applicable and material

categories and activities across Vector’s supply chain. A total of

14 categories were determined as being applicable to Vector (all

but category 10 – processing of sold products), of which two were

defined as material. The threshold at which a scope 3 category is

considered as material is set to 1% of total scope 3 emissions.

During the screening process, emissions were calculated for

11 scope 3 categories, with emissions from the remaining three

categories considered to be included in other categories of

the inventory (categories 2 and 8) or to be zero (category 12).

Prior to FY2023, we chose to externally report only on emissions

categories that were material (categories 1 and 11) or where data

was deemed robust (categories 3, 4, 6 and 15). With additional

work undertaken to more accurately determine emissions

from other sources, from FY2023 we also reported on emissions

under categories 5 and 7 as well as emissions from all purchased

products and services under category 1.

Included in other categories

Category 2 – capital goods: Included in category 1 as it was not

possible to separate new infrastructure construction and other

assets from maintenance of existing infrastructure.

Category 8 – upstream leased assets: Included in scope 1 and 2,

as leased assets are expected to be under Vector’s operational

control.

Table 3: Excluded emissions sources from reporting

EXCLUDED EMISSIONS ACTIVITYREASONS FOR EXCLUSION

Emissions from FSP fuel use where fuel amount is <1% of overall FSP fuel

use (part of category 1 – fuel used by FSPs)

Emissions immaterial; data difficult to obtain

Use of sold HVAC units (part of category 11 – use of sold products)Likely immaterial; limited data availability

Emissions from cash expense claims for air travel, hotels, employee travel

in public transport and rental cars (part of category 6 – business travel)

Emissions immaterial; data difficult to obtain

Excluded scope 3 categories

Category 4 – upstream transportation: for most purchased

products, transport is covered by category 1 – upstream-

purchased other goods and services as it is included in the

purchase price. Emissions from remaining transportation are

expected to be immaterial.

Category 9 – downstream transportation and distribution:

immaterial.

Category 12 – end-of-life treatment of sold products: expected

to be zero.

Category 13 – downstream leased assets: immaterial.

Category 14 – franchises: immaterial.

GHG emissions source inclusions

Table 4 provides an overview of all emissions sources

highlighted in Vector’s GHG inventory, including their data

sources, calculation methods and an assessment of data

quality and uncertainty.

For completeness, Vector is reporting on well-to-tank (WTT)

emissions for fuel used by field service providers (FSPs) under

category 1, as well as reporting on emissions from gas distributed

via Vector’s gas network under category 11 (other distributed

natural gas).

For the FY2020 to FY2024 period, some gas sold or shipped by

Natural Gas Trading was transported via Vector’s gas distribution

network. These volumes were subtracted from the overall ‘other

distributed natural gas’ amount to avoid double counting.

Exclusions from GHG inventory

Table 3 shows scope 3 emissions sources that were excluded from

reporting (in addition to the excluded categories listed previously)

and the reasoning behind this.

Other emissions – biogenic CO₂

Vector uses a 5% biodiesel blend in generators used by Vector

Fibre and the electricity distribution network.

Summary of

emissions

Organisational

boundaries

Data collection

and quantification

References

and Appendix

GHG emissions

calculation

and results

GHG emissions

reductions

Operational

boundaries

7
Figure 2: Examples of emissions sources across Vector’s value chain

Upstream

Scope 3Scope 2Scope 1Scope 3

VectorVector

DIRECTINDIRECTINDIRECTINDIRECT

Downstream

The extraction,

production and

manufacture of

materials and

services Vector

purchases from

around the globe

create emissions

at source and

en route to us.

Field service crews

distribute and

install these

materials on

behalf of Vector.

This requires

transportation.

Because of the laws

of physics, some

electricity that

Vector distributes

is lost along the

way. Generation

emissions

associated with

this electricity loss

is included in

Vector’s footprint.

Scope 2 emissions

also include

electricity

consumption at

Vector’s offices

and substations.

Some of our assets

can leak global

warming gases

through damage

or age.

We use fuels in

vehicles to deliver

goods, and in

generators to keep

the power going

during outages.

Distributed gas

is burned by

consumers for

their everyday

activities.

2. Operational boundaries (continued)

Summary of

emissions

Organisational

boundaries

Data collection

and quantification

References

and Appendix

GHG emissions

calculation

and results

GHG emissions

reductions

Operational

boundaries

8Vector GHG Emissions Inventory Report FY2025
Table 4: Emissions calculation methods, data quality and sources for FY2025 reporting. For years before FY2025, refer to previous

GHG reports.

REPORTING

CATEGORY

EMISSIONS

ACTIVITY

CALCULATION

METHOD

DATA

SOURCE

GWP

SOURCE

DATA QUALITY

AND UNCERTAINTY

SCOPE 1

Natural gas

distribution

fugitive

emissions

Fugitive

natural

gas across

Vector’s

distribution

network

See section 3FSP records;

company

records on asset

database

MfE (2025) –

IPCC AR5

Quality-assured data on all leaks by asset

and emissions category provided by FSPs.

Multiple estimates and assumptions

made, as laid out in section 3, lead

to medium uncertainty that Vector

is continuing to improve. Vector’s

methodology has been reviewed by

GNS Science, and assessed as OGMP

2.0 Level 3 or slightly above.

SF₆ fugitive

emissions

SF₆ leaks in

switchgear

Top-up methodGas recovery

records; FSP SF₆

cylinder records’

log sheets;

nameplate

capacity

amounts

Records on gas top-ups and recoveries

provided by FSPs. Medium level of

uncertainty that Vector is working on

improving where possible.

Other fugitive

emissions

HVAC leaks

(offices,

substations,

vehicle fleet)

and CO₂

Top-up and

screening

method

for HVAC;

estimates

for CO₂

Service records;

inventory lists

Most data on HVAC top-ups available,

and when not available annual averages

for each inventory item used as specified

by MfE. CO₂ use estimated – de minimis.

High uncertainty, but emissions <1% of

scope 1 and are considered adequate.

Biodiesel

stationary

combustion

Biodiesel

used in

generators

Fuel-based

method

Provider recordsRecords on litres of diesel used in

generators supplied by lease provider

monthly. Low uncertainty.

Vehicle fleetFuel used in

vehicle fleet

Fuel-based

method

Fuel records by

lease providers

Records on diesel and petrol use sourced

from fuel card data. Low uncertainty.

SCOPE 2

Electricity

consumption

from grid

(market and

location based)

Electricity use

at offices and

substations

Location-based

method and

market-based

method,

respectively

Invoices by

retailers;

BraveTrace

website (market-

based approach)

MfE (2025)

– IPCC AR5

(location

based)

NZECS –

market based

Consumption data in kWh provided by

retailers. Records on NZECS to calculate

market-based approach provided on

BraveTrace website. Moderate uncertainty

from emission factors.

Electricity

distribution

losses

Electricity

losses along

the network

Location-based

method

Transpower

and distributed

generators

(ingoing);

retailers

(outgoing)

MfE (2025) –

IPCC AR5

Metered data at grid exit point (GXP)

provided by Transpower and distributed

generators. Data at installation control

points (ICP) level provided by retailers.

Some estimations at year-end. Low

uncertainty.

2. Operational boundaries (continued)

Summary of

emissions

Organisational

boundaries

Data collection

and quantification

References

and Appendix

GHG emissions

calculation

and results

GHG emissions

reductions

Operational

boundaries

9
2. Operational boundaries (continued)

REPORTING

CATEGORY

EMISSIONS

ACTIVITY

CALCULATION

METHOD

DATA

SOURCE

GWP

SOURCE

DATA QUALITY

AND UNCERTAINTY

SCOPE 3

C1 – fuel used

by FSPs

Fuel used

by FSPs

on behalf

of Vector,

including

WTT

Hybrid methodFuel data provided

by FSPs

MfE (2025) –

IPCC AR5

DEFRA

(2025) – IPCC

AR5

Petrol and diesel use on

behalf of Vector shared by

each FSP for relevant business

areas, in litres. Some data on

regular and premium petrol

combined. Low uncertainty.

100%

C1 – upstream-

purchased

materials and

products

Key products

purchased

across Vector

business

areas

Supplier-

specific and

average-data

method

Procurement data

on quantities (by

weight or length) of

products purchased

EPDs – IPCC

AR5

Records on quantities sourced

from internal systems. Where

supplier-specific data was

used, uncertainty is lowest.

For average-data method,

some estimations were made

and secondary data is used;

therefore, uncertainty is

relatively high. More details in

section 3.

15%

C1 – upstream-

purchased

other goods

and services

All remaining

products

and services

purchased

Spend-based

method

Procurement

spend data

Eora MRIO

2022

Spend by supplier sourced

from internal procurement

system, emission factor was

assigned based on supplier’s

main business activity. High

uncertainty. More details in

section 3.

0%

C3 – fuel- and

energy-related

activities

T&D,

upstream

and WTT

emissions

from the

group’s

electricity

and fuel use

Average-data

method

Same invoice

data as fuel and

electricity use in

scope 1 and 2

MfE (2025)

– IPCC AR5

(T&D losses)

DEFRA

(2025) – IPCC

AR5 (WTT

fuels)

DEFRA

(2021) – IPCC

AR4 (WTT

electricity)

All data based on fuel data

or location-based electricity

consumption data provided

for scope 1 and 2. T&D

emissions not calculated for

electricity consumption in

Auckland, as this is covered

under scope 2 losses.

Moderate uncertainty from

emission factors.

0%

1. Proportion of emissions calculated using calculation methods based on data specific to suppliers or other value chain partners. Remaining

emissions are calculated using internal or average data.

Table 4 (continued): Emissions calculation methods, data quality and sources for FY2025 reporting. For years before FY2025, refer

to previous GHG reports.

EMISSIONS

CALCULATED USING

DATA PROVIDED

BY VALUE CHAIN

PARTNERS

1

Summary of

emissions

Organisational

boundaries

Data collection

and quantification

References

and Appendix

GHG emissions

calculation

and results

GHG emissions

reductions

Operational

boundaries

10Vector GHG Emissions Inventory Report FY2025
REPORTING

CATEGORY

EMISSIONS

ACTIVITY

CALCULATION

METHOD

DATA

SOURCE

GWP

SOURCE

DATA QUALITY

AND UNCERTAINTY

SCOPE 3

C5 – waste

generated in

operations

Waste sent

to landfill

from Vector’s

offices

Waste-type

specific

method

Waste contractor

records

MfE (2025) –

IPCC AR5

Weight per waste category

by location provided by

waste contractors. Some

measurements use averages.

Based on information

provided by Vector’s waste

contractors, it is assumed

that all waste goes to landfills

with gas recovery. Medium

uncertainty that is considered

adequate as <1% of scope 3.

0%

C6 – business

travel

Air travel,

hotels, rental

cars, mileage

claims, and

taxis

Distance-

based method

Records provided

by booking agents

or internal expense

management

platform

MfE (2025)

– IPCC AR5

(flights

excluding

radiative

forcing)

Monthly travel details

provided by booking agents

on km flown by class of travel,

hotel nights by country, km

travelled by size of rental car,

km travelled by taxi. Employee

mileage emissions based on

km, average petrol vehicle,

and some spend base for

taxis. Medium uncertainty

that is considered adequate

as <1% of scope 3.

0%

C7 – employee

commuting

and working

from home

(WFH)

Emissions

from staff

commutes

to work and

WFH

Distance-

based method

Results from

staff survey on

commuting habits

MfE (2025) –

IPCC AR5

Data gathered on travel

modes, distance to work,

and days in office via staff

survey. Extrapolated for the

full year assuming that travel

habits are stable across the

year. Some estimations and

assumptions that lead to

high uncertainty. Considered

adequate as <1% of scope 3.

0%

C11 –

distributed

natural gas –

Auckland

Gas

distributed

via Auckland

network

Direct use-

phase method

– fuel

Firstgas OATIS

system

MfE (2025) –

IPCC AR5

Quantities of gas distributed

via Auckland network.

Calculation assumes all gas

is converted to CO₂ via either

combustion or chemical

process by consumers. Low

uncertainty.

100%

C15 –

Bluecurrent

50% of

scope 1 and

2 emissions

from

Bluecurrent

Investment-

specific

method

Invoice-and-FSP-

based records

provided by

Bluecurrent

MfE (2025) –

IPCC AR5

Actual energy consumption

provided by Bluecurrent.

Gas metering fugitive

emissions based on multiple

assumptions and estimates,

which leads to medium

uncertainty. Considered

adequate.

100%

1. Proportion of emissions calculated using calculation methods based on data specific to suppliers or other value chain partners. Remaining

emissions are calculated using internal or average data.

Table 4 (continued): Emissions calculation methods, data quality and sources for FY2025 reporting. For years before FY2025, refer

to previous GHG reports.

EMISSIONS

CALCULATED USING

DATA PROVIDED

BY VALUE CHAIN

PARTNERS

1

2. Operational boundaries (continued)

Summary of

emissions

Organisational

boundaries

Data collection

and quantification

References

and Appendix

GHG emissions

calculation

and results

GHG emissions

reductions

Operational

boundaries

11
3. Data collection and quantification

Information management procedures

Vector uses an internal process guideline for GHG emissions

accounting to ensure consistency in the preparation of our

GHG inventory. This was developed following a screening of

Vector’s full value chain emissions and setting the base year to

FY2020. The document outlines responsibilities, and defines

thresholds, calculation methods and recalculation policy, among

other details that ensure conformance with the GHG Protocol

Standards over time.

Vector uses the software solution BraveGen to collect data and

calculate our carbon footprint. Activity data is gathered and

uploaded either by Vector’s staff across all business areas, or

directly by suppliers. All data is reviewed by the GHG accounting

team before final upload onto the system. Emissions are

calculated automatically within BraveGen by multiplying the

provided activity data with each applicable emission factor.

These factors are updated every year as required by our GHG

accounting team.

Some material changes, such as the change in the GWP of

methane from 25 to 28 in FY2024, are overseen by Vector’s

board audit committee as a key judgment.

Prior to KPMG’s assurance of the GHG inventory, the inventory

is analysed by our GHG accounting team for trends and missing

data. Upon completed assurance, Vector’s executive team and

board are informed of changes in emissions over time. Both the

internal GHG emissions accounting guide as well as our emissions

reduction strategy are reviewed and updated frequently.

Methodologies

Most of Vector’s GHG emissions are calculated by multiplying

activity data with appropriate emission factors. Examples of

activity data include kilowatt-hour (kWh) of electricity used,

volume of fuel used, or gigajoules (GJ) of gas distributed. Most

activity data is based on consumption data sourced from invoices

provided by suppliers, or internal reports.

An overview of sources used per category is included in table 4.

Most emission factors used are sourced from the latest

publications (at financial year end) by New Zealand’s Ministry

for the Environment (MfE) [4] and the UK’s Department of

Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) [5]. Exceptions are

outlined below:

‒ From March 2023, the majority of Vector group’s consumed

electricity is purchased from Ecotricity, a Toitū climate-

positive certified electricity retailer. Electricity consumed

via installation control points (ICPs) included on the Ecotricity

contract can be calculated as zero under market-based

reporting.

‒ Emissions from FY2025 electricity use not purchased from

Ecotricity are calculated using the Residual Supply Mix

emission factor as disclosed by the New Zealand Energy

Certificate System [6]. The residual factor is based on the

production year period April to March.

Emission factor sources and the underlying assessment report

for each scope and category are listed in table 4. The GWP time

horizon in all cases is 100 years.

Fugitive emissions from gas distribution (scope 1) as well as

emissions from ‘upstream-purchased materials and products’

and ‘upstream-purchased other goods and services’ (scope 3

– category 1) are subject to more complex calculations that are

described in the following two subsections.

Gas distribution fugitive emissions

Methods for calculating gas distribution fugitive emissions

(methane leaks) are unique to gas distribution pipeline

companies and will be briefly described here for completeness.

In FY2021, Vector undertook a comprehensive study to model

methane leaks on our gas network. The model created a

fluid-dynamics based, quasi-digital twin of the network, which

enabled us to identify and quantify methane leaks.

Vector is aligned to the guidelines of the Technical Association

of the European Gas Industry (Marcogaz [7]), and the Oil and Gas

Methane Partnership methodology (OGMP 2.0 [8]), which are

found to be the most comprehensive and applicable to Vector’s

gas network. Marcogaz is currently in the process of integrating

these guidelines into the CEN/ TC 234 European Technical

Standard for Gas Infrastructure.

This quantification method requires Vector to split the gas

network into groups of assets and corresponding categories of

emissions that can be expected from these groups.

The emissions categories can be defined as:

Pipe permeation: Permeation of gas through the membrane

material of the polyethylene pipes

Leaks detected by systematic surveys: Found using street

evaluation laser methane assessment (SELMA), which are

conducted on a three-monthly basis for intermediate pressure

(IP) systems and six-monthly for all other sections of the pipeline

District regulator stations: Operational emissions approximated

using the American Petroleum Institute Compendium of

Greenhouse Gas Emissions [9]

Third-party damages (TPD): Leaks when gas pipelines are

damaged by third parties

Operational/maintenance emissions: Vented natural gas during

commissioning, decommissioning, and asset maintenance

Public-reported escapes: Leaks detected by members of

the public

Valves and fittings: Additional leaks from seal failures of valves

and fittings.

Summary of

emissions

Organisational

boundaries

Operational

boundaries

References

and Appendix

GHG emissions

calculation

and results

GHG emissions

reductions

Data collection

and quantification

12Vector GHG Emissions Inventory Report FY2025
Table 5: Breakdown of gas distribution fugitive emissions by category in tCO₂e

EMISSIONS SOURCEFY2020FY2021FY2022FY2023FY2024FY2025

Total 18,313 13,507 16,218 13,323 9,379 7,887

Pipe permeation 54 54 55 55 38 46

Leaks detected in systematic surveys 11,981 6,739 8,446 7,491 3,931 2,914

Operational/maintenance emissions 12 15 10 5 5 2

Third-party damages 4,698 5,242 6,245 4,353 3,958 3,325

Public-reported escapes 23 17 21 21 19 151

District regulator stations (DRS)

(maintenance and operation)

847 742 737 688 708 718

Valves and fittings 698 698 704 710 720 730

As it is not feasible to measure every variable, key assumptions

are made. The following assumptions have a material impact

on the overall data:

‒Duration of leak detected during systematic surveys: When

a leak is found on a routine survey, there is no knowledge of

when the leak started. However, we do know when the pipe

was last surveyed, and, assuming a normal distribution, can

assume that on average the duration of a leak is half the time

since the last survey. For example, Vector runs routine surveys

for most sections of the pipeline every six months. We can

therefore approximate that the average leak duration is three

months. This is in alignment with Marcogaz guidelines.

‒Average size of leak found on systematic surveys: Most of the

historical records of the detected leaks have been a result of

loose fittings. Vector has conducted several review sessions

internally and across the industry and found that the most

applicable assumption is in the RR630-HSE, UK standard.

Within that, we take a conservative estimate of a hole size

of 2 mm2.

‒Average size of leaks found from third-party damages:

Normalised across all third-party damages to 30 mm,

based on measured samples.

‒Permeability of the ground: 7,000 km of pipes run through

various ground and geological formations. An estimation of

soil permeability is made according to ISBN 0-486- 65675-6,

and based on the New Zealand soil map. We have conducted

actual field measurements to verify these assumptions.

This testing further improves our current reporting level

relative to the Marcogaz criteria and the OGMP 2.0 guidelines.

In FY2023, GNS Science conducted an independent review

of this methodology. This included a review of the Marcogaz

methodology that Vector is following in assessing emissions;

a review of Vector’s implementation of this methodology; an

assessment of Vector’s current level of reporting relative to

the Marcogaz criteria and the underlying standards; as well as

recommendations for future work that would improve Vector’s

emissions reporting and move Vector to a higher reporting level.

The key improvement opportunity identified is to obtain more

specific, local emission factors, with GNS Science’s overall finding

that Vector is currently operating at OGMP 2.0 Level 3 or slightly

above. Level 5 is the highest possible level that also requires the

use of site-level measurement to reconcile source and site-level

emission estimates.

Upstream-purchased materials and products

Methodologies to quantify emissions from purchased goods

and services vary depending on data availability from suppliers.

Those identified as key suppliers for a specific business unit,

either based on spend or the type and quantities of products

purchased, were contacted to request supplier-specific

emissions data.

Preference was given to data published in environmental

product declarations (EPDs), from which we extracted the GWP

for the manufacturing/production phase (A1 – A3; total GWP

where a breakdown was provided). Where supplier-specific EPDs

were not available, secondary emission factors from EPDs for

comparable products or underlying raw materials have been

used as proxy data.

Upstream-purchased other goods and services

Emissions from all remaining purchases were quantified using

the spend-based method. For FY2025, this calculation covers

around 32% (FY2024: 28%) of Vector’s annual spend and more

than 700 suppliers. It uses environmentally-extended input

output (EEIO) emission factors, which estimate GHG emissions

resulting from the production and upstream supply chain

activities of different products in an economy. For FY2025, we

used Eora MRIO 2022 scope 3 multipliers for New Zealand [10, 11]

and adjusted them for inflation to the midpoint of the financial

year. Emission factors were assigned based on a supplier’s main

business activity.

As more specific data becomes available, such as through

supplier release of EPDs, the emissions data for upstream-

purchased materials and products can be refined, therefore

reducing the percentage of emissions calculated using the

spend-based approach.

The approach we used for both sub-categories built on previous

work completed in FY2023 with the support of thinkstep-anz,

a trans-Tasman firm offering strategic advice on sustainability.

Note that emissions from fuel used by FSPs have been calculated

using supplier-specific data since FY2020 and have been

reported under scope 3 – category 1 in Vector’s GHG emissions

inventory since then.

3. Data collection and quantification (continued)

Summary of

emissions

Organisational

boundaries

Operational

boundaries

References

and Appendix

GHG emissions

calculation

and results

GHG emissions

reductions

Data collection

and quantification

13
7,887

Natural gas distribution

fugitive emissions

39,437

Electricity distribution losses

1,325

Stationary

combustion

647

Vehicle fleet

487

SF

6


leakage

39

Electricity

consumption

(market-based)

103

Other fugitive

emissions

4. GHG emissions calculation

and results

Base year

Vector’s base year for emissions reporting is FY2020, 1 July 2019

to 30 June 2020. This was the first year that the GHG inventory

included most material scope 3 emissions and forms the base

year for Vector’s emissions reduction target.

Changes to historic years

Vector recalculates emissions of historic years if the inventory

is affected by changes that in aggregate total 5% of our carbon

footprint. These changes can be structural (for example

acquisitions or divestments), changes in the way the inventory

is calculated, or discovery of omissions or errors. Vector might

decide to update historic years for changes below the threshold

for other reasons, such as consistency or clarity.

Recalculations were required this year as follows:

‒Because of the sale of the Ongas LPG business and shares

in Liquigas Limited, emissions created by these businesses

have been removed for all years from FY2020.

‒Emissions relating to the sold Natural Gas Trading contracts

have been removed from scope 3 for FY2022 to FY2024. There

is no impact on the base year given the earliest start date of

the sold contracts was 1 July 2021.

For an overview of all recalculations, including those from

previous years, see appendix 2.

FY2025 results

In FY2025, total GHG emissions for Vector came to 794,241 tCO

2

e.

This is a reduction of 54% from our base year in FY2020.

Scope 1

Vector’s direct emissions in FY2025 amount to 10,449 tCO

2

e,

a reduction from our base year by 54%. Explanations on the most

notable changes in emissions across scope 1 are outlined below.

Natural gas distribution fugitive emissions

Natural gas fugitive emissions have decreased by 57% between

FY2020 and FY2025. A large contributor to this reduction is

proactive pipeline surveying and other gas network operational

initiatives such as reducing response time.

Diesel use in generators

Stationary combustion decreased by 60% between FY2020 and

FY2025, largely driven by the switch from diesel generators to

mobile transformers on planned asset replacements.

SF₆ emissions

SF

6

emissions have decreased by 7% from the FY2020 base year.

Figure 3: Vector’s GHG emissions inventory FY2025, scope 1 and 2 only

Summary of

emissions

Organisational

boundaries

Operational

boundaries

Data collection

and quantification

References

and Appendix

GHG emissions

reductions

GHG emissions

calculation

and results

14Vector GHG Emissions Inventory Report FY2025
Distributed

natural gas

Upstream-purchased

other goods & services

Fuel used by field

service providers

Upstream-purchased

materials & products

Waste generated in

operations

Business travel

Employee commuting

and WFH

Bluecurrent

Fuel and energy-

related activities

647,278

Distributed natural gas

79,224

Upstream-

purchased other

goods & services

SCOPE 2 – 39,476SCOPE 1 – 10,449

53

202

666

729

642

6,0879,435

Scope 2

Scope 2 emissions are split into emissions from Vector’s own

consumption of electricity from the grid, and emissions from

distribution losses across Vector’s network.

Vector’s 21% increase in electricity distribution losses in FY2025

compared to FY2020 can be attributed to several factors,

including load profiles and distance to load. However, year-on-

year fluctuations in distributed losses are materially influenced

by the national electricity emission factor [4]. For example, the

emission factor used to calculate electricity distribution losses

rose by 38% between FY2024 and FY2025 owing to an increase in

the proportion of fossil-based generation.

Scope 3

Value chain emissions have decreased 55% relative to the FY2020

base year. The material category is the use of sold products,

which decreased 52% since FY2020, driven by the wind-down

and subsequent closure of Vector’s Natural Gas Trading business.

Further to this, there was a 16% reduction in gas distribution

emissions because of lower gas consumption in Auckland.

Figure 4: Vector’s GHG emissions inventory FY2025, scopes 1, 2 and 3

Table 6: Scope 1 and scope 2 FY2025 GHG emissions by

greenhouse gas. PFCs and NF₃ are not listed here as they

are not relevant to Vector’s activities. GWP conversion factors

are from the latest MfE guidance documents.

TOTAL FY2025tGWPtCO₂e

Scope 110,449

CO₂1,93311,933

CH₄282287,893

N₂O0.1226533

HFCS*0.05677 – 1,924103

SF₆0.0223,500487

Scope 2**39,476

CO₂38,337138,337

CH₄38281,065

N₂O0.2826574

Total tCO₂e49,925

* HFCs relate to a family of gases used in applications such as

refrigeration and air conditioning. Different applications use

different HFCs so we display a range here.

** Market-based method for electricity consumption. While location-

based electricity emissions are also included in our inventory, the

amounts in table 6 include only market-based emissions, as these

form part of our emissions reduction target.

4. GHG emissions calculation and results (continued)

Summary of

emissions

Organisational

boundaries

Operational

boundaries

Data collection

and quantification

References

and Appendix

GHG emissions

reductions

GHG emissions

calculation

and results

15
5. GHG emissions reductions

Emissions reduction target

In FY2021, Vector set an absolute emissions reduction target. That

target is for Vector to reduce our scope 1 and 2 emissions (excluding

electricity distribution losses) by 53.5% by FY2030 from a FY2020

baseline. The target was developed by thinkstep-anz in 2021, based

on a methodology published by the Science Based Target Initiative

(SBTi) and the SBTi’s then applicable guidance on reductions

required to be consistent with keeping global warming to 1.5°C.

Our target has not been validated by SBTi because SBTi’s

methodology provided for the inclusion of emissions related

to electricity distribution losses, which we have excluded.

Further detail regarding this exclusion is set out below.

The emissions reduction target does not rely on any offsets.

Vector does not have any interim targets.

In FY2025 we achieved our emissions reduction target, five years

ahead of the original FY2030 target date, with a reduction in our

scope 1 and 2 emissions (excluding distribution losses) of 55%

compared to the FY2020 base year. This was largely because of a

reduction in natural gas fugitive emissions, along with a reduction

in diesel-generation-related emissions.

Meeting the target in FY2025 does not guarantee that the

emissions reductions can be maintained in subsequent years.

There are key risks highlighted in table 7 that could result in Vector

missing our target in any given year.

Exclusion of electricity distribution losses from

our target

Electricity distribution losses are not like a water or gas leak; they

are an inherent characteristic of electricity distribution networks.

Although we can measure these losses, and report their associated

emissions based on New Zealand’s published electricity generation

emissions factor, we can never fully remove them. As distribution

losses are largely an inevitable by-product of electrical conduction,

Vector has elected to exclude emissions associated with such losses

from our emissions reduction target. This allows our target to focus

on emissions that we can more readily manage.

Additional information

Under the New Zealand Emissions Trading Scheme (NZ ETS),

Vector is obligated to surrender New Zealand Units (NZUs) for

emissions related to fugitive SF₆.

NZ ETS reporting is by calendar year, while Vector’s GHG emissions

reporting is by financial year (1 July to 30 June). For the 2024

calendar year, Vector surrendered NZUs to the value of 422 tCO₂e

related to fugitive SF₆ gases.

Assurance

Information subject to assurance by KPMG includes the summary

of emissions and sections 1 to 4. KPMG does not provide assurance

of this section of the GHG report.

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

Group emissionsFY2030 target

Emissions (tCO


e)

FY30FY29FY28FY27FY26FY25FY24FY23FY22FY21FY20

FY2030 emissions

reduction target

FY2025FY2020

Emissions (tCO

e)

Electricity

consumption

(market-based)

Vehicle

fleet

Stationary

combustion

including

biogenic

carbon

Other

fugitive

emissions

SF

6

leakage

Natural gas

distribution

fugitive

emissions

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

Figure 5: (left) Emissions included in Vector’s emissions reduction target – scope 1 and 2 excluding distribution losses and their

comparison to the FY2020 base year. (right) Vector’s yearly scope 1 and 2 emissions excluding distribution losses since FY2020.

Emissions are in tCO₂e.

Summary of

emissions

Organisational

boundaries

Operational

boundaries

Data collection

and quantification

References

and Appendix

GHG emissions

calculation

and results

GHG emissions

reductions

16Vector GHG Emissions Inventory Report FY2025
Abatement

cost

$/tCO₂e/year

Abatement

potential

tCO₂e

Using mobile transformers as

opposed to diesel generators for

multi-day upgrades (2024)

Hybrid generator (in trial)

Transition remaining light

vehicle fleet to EV (2020 – 2027)

Transition vans and utes to

electric (when available)

3-month gas pipeline surveying (2027)

Vector headquarters to ‘6 Green Star’

building (2023)

Annual gas pipeline

surveying (2022)

6-month gas pipeline surveying (2024)

SF6

monitoring

Renewable-only

electricity (2023)

Uncosted emissions

Third-party

gas pipeline

damage

Public engagement on dial

before you dig (2023)

Completed

In progress

Planned

Other

fugitive

methane

Other

diesel

generation

$140/

tCO₂e

53.5%

Emissions

reduction

target

3-month high-pressure gas

pipeline surveying (2025)

Reducing unnecessary diesel

generation through process

optimisation (2021)

$0

-$1,000

-$2,000

$1,000

Figure 6: Vector’s marginal carbon cost abatement curve. The horizontal axis corresponds to Vector’s total FY2020 scope 1 and 2

emissions excluding electricity distribution losses. Each bar relates to a potential emissions reduction initiative where the thickness

of the bar details the amount of emissions reductions estimated to be possible as a result of the initiatives. The vertical axis

represents the estimated cost, with negative values indicating estimated cost savings. Initiatives are ordered left to right, from the

most cost-saving to the most expensive.

5. GHG emissions reductions (continued)

Marginal carbon abatement cost curve

In FY2022, Vector developed a carbon abatement cost curve to

help measure and understand our emissions reduction target

(scope 1 and 2 excluding electricity distribution losses) and

actions available to us to contribute to reaching that target.

This work identifies the financial impact of potential carbon

reduction activity across scope 1 and 2 emissions, using an

internal carbon cost of $140 per tCO₂e. This amount was

chosen as it aligns with the Climate Change Commission’s 2021

recommendations to government to meet its 2050 targets [12]

and is consistent with our internal carbon cost since FY2022. We

consider this internal carbon cost to still be appropriate.

Through this work, we identified emissions that could be reduced

while achieving cost savings for the group (those with negative

abatement cost), and others that were close to cost neutral (those

with bars close to $0/tCO₂e/year), with the balance assessed as

being more complex to abate given the availability of current

alternatives. While the data in the cost curve is updated based

on the latest information, it presents forward-looking estimates

of emissions reduction potential, as opposed to actual emissions

results. The estimates are also conservative, which explains

how we have already met our emissions reduction target, even

though we have not yet completed all the actions on the curve.

The cost curve was updated in FY2025 to include the sale of the

Ongas business – this removed any emissions reduction activities

associated with Ongas, along with a removal of corresponding

historic emissions.

A summary of key risks that may form a barrier to Vector

achieving its emissions reduction target is highlighted in table 7.

Changes in technology, project prices, emissions cost modelling,

new business innovation and a range of other factors may

alter the marginal carbon abatement cost curve in our

future disclosures.

Summary of

emissions

Organisational

boundaries

Operational

boundaries

Data collection

and quantification

References

and Appendix

GHG emissions

calculation

and results

GHG emissions

reductions

17
Table 7: Key risks that may form a barrier to Vector achieving our emissions reduction target

CARBON ABATEMENT RISK DESCRIPTION 

Damage to high-

pressure pipelines 

Damage to Vector’s high-pressure gas pipelines can release significant quantities of CO₂e.

For example, two leaks detected in FY2022 were responsible for the release of over 3,000 tCO₂e.

While we can reduce emissions over time on average, these high-volatility events can cause a

sudden spike in emissions for that reporting year. In addition, there is a risk that emissions from

third-party damages (such as a contractor digging into the pipe) remain high or increase, with

limited influence from Vector’s side.

Long-term SF₆ assets on

Vector’s network

Many of Vector’s SF₆ assets have a lifetime beyond 2030. It is challenging to replace all these

assets before FY2030, and leaks can be largely unpredictable. Although we have installed some

monitoring devices that alert us of leaks quickly, there is still a risk that leaks could increase and

keep occurring. SF₆ has an emission factor 23,500 times that of CO₂; therefore, even small leaks

of SF₆ can have material impacts on our emissions inventory.

5. GHG emissions reductions (continued)

Summary of

emissions

Organisational

boundaries

Operational

boundaries

Data collection

and quantification

References

and Appendix

GHG emissions

calculation

and results

GHG emissions

reductions

18Vector GHG Emissions Inventory Report FY2025
References

1World Resources Institute and World Business Council for Sustainable Development. 2004. The Greenhouse Gas Protocol:

A Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard, USA.

2World Resources Institute and World Business Council for Sustainable Development. 2015. GHG Protocol Scope 2 guidance:

An amendment to the GHG Protocol Corporate Standard, USA.

3World Resources Institute and World Business Council for Sustainable Development. 2011. Corporate Value Chain (Scope 3)

Accounting and Reporting Standard, USA.

4New Zealand Government – Ministry for the Environment. 2025. Measuring emissions guide: 2025, Wellington: Ministry for

the Environment.

5

UK Government – Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. 2025. Greenhouse gas reporting: conversion factors

2025. Accessed 21 July 2025 gov.uk/government/publications/greenhouse-gas-reporting-conversion-factors-2025

6

BraveTrace – New Zealand Energy Certificate System. Accessed 24 July 2025

bravetrace.co.nz/residual-supply-mix/

7Technical Association of the European Natural Gas Industry (Marcogaz). 2019. Assessment of methane emissions for gas

Transmission and Distribution system operators.

8

The Oil & Gas Methane Partnership 2.0. Accessed 21 July 2025 ogmpartnership.org/resources

9 American Petroleum Institute. 2009. Compendium of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Estimation Methodologies for the Oil and

Natural Gas Industry.

10Lenzen M, Kanemoto K, Moran D and Geschke A. 2012. Mapping the structure of the world economy. Environmental Science &

Technology 46(15), pp 8374–8381.

11Lenzen M, Kanemoto K, Moran D and Geschke A. 2013. Building Eora: A Global Multi-regional Input-Output Database at High

Country and Sector Resolution. Economic Systems Research 25:1, pp 20-49.

12New Zealand Government – Climate Change Commission. 2021. Ināia tonu nei: a low emissions future for Aotearoa.


Summary of

emissions

Organisational

boundaries

Operational

boundaries

Data collection

and quantification

GHG emissions

calculation

and results

GHG emissions

reductions

References

and Appendix

19
Appendix

WHOLLY OWNED

AND JOINT

OPERATIONS

CARBON

FOOTPRINT

RELEVANT

FURTHER INFO ON

CARBON FOOTPRINT

RELEVANCE

ECONOMIC

INTEREST

HELD

PRINCIPAL

ACTIVITY

VECTOR ORG

STRUCTURE

NAME

HOLDING

COMPANY

NAME

Vector LimitedyesOperational control approach

(100% for Vector’s scopes 1,2,3)

100%Parent companyVector LimitedN/A

Vector

Investment

Holdings Limited

no No emissions from operations 100%Holding

company

N/A – Holding

company

Vector Limited

Vector Gas

Trading Limited

yes –

until 1

July 2024

Operational control approach

(100% for Vector’s scopes 1,2,3)

100%Holding

company

N/A - Holding

company

Vector

Investment

Holdings Limited

Vector Advanced

Metering Assets

(Australia)

Limited

no No emissions from operations 100%Investment

company

N/A Vector

Investment

Holdings Limited

Vector MeterCo

Limited

no No emissions from operations 100%Holding

company

N/A – Holding

company

Vector

Investment

Holdings Limited

Bluecurrent

Holdings NZ

Limited

yesNo operational control.

Proportional (50%) scope 1

and 2 emissions accounted

for under scope 3, category 15

50%Metering

services

N/AVector MeterCo

Limited

Bluecurrent

Holdings

(Australia) Pty

Limited

yesNo operational control.

Proportional (50%) scope 1

and 2 emissions accounted

for under scope 3, category 15

50%Metering

services

N/AVector MeterCo

Limited

Vector SPV No.1

Limited (formerly

On Gas Limited)

noNo emissions from operations100%Holding

company

N/A - Holding

company

Vector

Investment

Holdings Ltd

Vector

Communications

Limited

yesOperational control approach

(100% for Vector’s scopes 1,2,3)

100%Tele-

communications

Vector FibreVector Limited

Vector Energy

Solutions Limited

no No emissions from operations 100%Holding

company

N/A – Holding

company

Vector Limited

Vector Energy

Solutions

(Australia) Pty

Limited

no No emissions from operations 100%Energy solutions

services

N/AVector Energy

Solutions

Limited

Vector SPV No.2

Limited (formerly

Powersmart NZ

Limited)

yes –

until 30

December

2023*

Operational control approach

(100% for Vector’s scopes 1,2,3)

100%Holding

company

N/A - Holding

company

Vector Energy

Solutions

Limited

E-Co Products

Group Limited

no No emissions from operations 100%Holding

company

N/A – Holding

company

Vector Energy

Solutions

Limited

Appendix 1: Vector’s subsidiaries as at 30 June 2025

* Emissions from operations before the business closure are captured in Vector’s carbon footprint.

Summary of

emissions

Organisational

boundaries

Operational

boundaries

Data collection

and quantification

GHG emissions

calculation

and results

GHG emissions

reductions

References

and Appendix

20Vector GHG Emissions Inventory Report FY2025
Appendix 1 (continued): Vector’s subsidiaries as at 30 June 2025

WHOLLY OWNED

AND JOINT

OPERATIONS

CARBON

FOOTPRINT

RELEVANT

FURTHER INFO ON

CARBON FOOTPRINT

RELEVANCE

ECONOMIC

INTEREST

HELD

PRINCIPAL

ACTIVITY

VECTOR ORG

STRUCTURE

NAME

HOLDING

COMPANY

NAME

Cristal Air

International

Limited (HRV)

yesOperational control approach

(100% for Vector’s scopes 1,2,3)

100%Ventilation,

heating and

water systems

sales and

assembly

HRVE-Co Products

Group Limited

Vector

Technology

Solutions Limited

yesOperational control approach

(100% for Vector’s scopes 1,2,3)

100%Technology

services

Vector

Technology

Solutions

Vector Limited

Vector

Technology

Solutions

Holdings USA LLC

noNo emissions from operations100%Holding

company

N/A – Holding

company

Vector

Technology

Solutions

Limited

VTS USA LLCnoNo emissions from operations100%Technology

services

N/AVector

Technology

Solutions

Holdings USA

LLC

Equalise Cyber

Security Limited

yesOperational control approach

(100% for Vector’s scopes 1,2,3)

100%Cyber security

solutions

Cyber security

solutions

Vector Limited

Vector ESPS

Trustee Limited

noNo emissions from operations100%Trustee

company

N/A – Trustee

company

Vector Limited

Vector Auckland

Property Limited

noNo emissions from operations100%Assets holding

company

N/A – Holding

company

Vector Limited

Vector Northern

Property Limited

noNo emissions from operations100%Assets holding

company

N/A – Holding

company

Vector Limited

Summary of

emissions

Organisational

boundaries

Operational

boundaries

Data collection

and quantification

GHG emissions

calculation

and results

GHG emissions

reductions

References

and Appendix

21
Appendix 2: Summary of GHG emissions inventory recalculations across years

RECALCULATION

DESCRIPTION

RESULTING CHANGE

IN INVENTORY

YEAR OF

REPORTED

CHANGE

SCOPE(S) AND

YEAR(S) AFFECTED

Structural change: Divestment of

Treescape shares

Recalculation of scope 3 – category

15. Voluntary recalculation for clarity

FY2022Scope 3 – category 15

FY2020: -3,069 tCO₂e

FY2021: -2,956 tCO₂e

Structural change: Sale of a 50%

interest in Bluecurrent, with loss

of operational control

Removing Bluecurrent emissions

from scope 1, 2 and 3, and adding

proportional scope 1 and 2 emissions

in relation to the investment to

scope 3 – category 15

FY2023Removal of Bluecurrent emissions

across scopes 1, 2 and 3

FY2020: -5,017 tCO₂e

FY2021: -5,099 tCO₂e

FY2022: -4,824 tCO₂e

50% of Bluecurrent’s scope 1 and 2

moved to scope 3 – category 15

FY2020: +700 tCO₂e

FY2021: +771 tCO₂e

FY2022: +809 tCO₂e

Improvement of data quality

and data availability for material

emissions source

Inclusion of additional purchased

goods and services emissions to

scope 3 – category 1

FY2023Scope 3 – category 1

FY2020: +91,205 tCO₂e

FY2021: +83,199 tCO₂e

FY2022: +88,953 tCO₂e

Quantification of leaks identified

subsequent to year-end

Update to gas fugitive emissions to

include data quantified after financial

year-end FY2022

FY2023Scope 1

FY2022: +3,040 tCO₂e

Improvement in the accuracy of

emission factors

Increase in scope 1 emissions

resulting from the change in GWP

for CH₄ between AR4 and AR5

FY2024Scope 1

FY2020: +1,945 tCO₂e

FY2021: +1,433 tCO₂e

FY2022: +1,724 tCO₂e

FY2023: +1,415 tCO₂e

Improvement in the accuracy of

emission factors and changes to

calculation methodology

Increase in scope 1 emissions

because of the change in GWP for

SF₆ between AR4 and AR5 as well as

update to SF₆ emissions to change

from calendar year data to financial

year data

FY2024Scope 1

FY2020: +99 tCO₂e

FY2021: +671 tCO₂e

FY2022: +223 tCO₂e

FY2023: -880 tCO₂e

Structural change: Sale of

remaining Natural Gas Trading

contracts

Removing Natural Gas Trading

emissions from contracts that

were sold (as opposed to terminated

at the end of the contract) from

scope 3 under category 1 (purchased

natural gas) and category 11 (use of

sold products)

FY2025Scope 3

FY2022: -285,409 tCO₂e

FY2023: -338,869 tCO₂e

FY2024: -347,082 tCO₂e

Structural change: Sale of the

Ongas LPG business and shares

in Liquigas Limited

Removing Ongas emissions from

scopes 1, 2 and 3, and removing

Liquigas emissions from scope 3 –

category 15

FY2025Scopes 1, 2 and 3

FY2020: -188,419 tCO₂e

FY2021: -187,594 tCO₂e

FY2022: -187,674 tCO₂e

FY2023: -191,594 tCO₂e

FY2024: -197,927 tCO₂e


Summary of

emissions

Organisational

boundaries

Operational

boundaries

Data collection

and quantification

GHG emissions

calculation

and results

GHG emissions

reductions

References

and Appendix

22Vector GHG Emissions Inventory Report FY20
[TRUNCATED]

Data sourced from publicly available filings. Our datasets may not be complete. Automated analysis can produce errors. If you believe any data on this page is incorrect, please contact us at hello@nzxplorer.co.nz. For informational purposes only. Not investment advice.