Vector announces full year results
creating a new energy future
Vector announces full year results and continued reliability
and resilience investment
Revenue from continuing operations, excluding contributions, is up 9% to
$893.5 million.
Group adjusted EBITDA
1
for continuing operations $401.1 million, up 16%.
Group net profit after tax for continuing operations $154.7 million, inclusive of a
$37 million impairment of the gas distribution network.
Final dividend 13 cents per share
2
.
Group capital expenditure for continuing operations $470.1 million, down 6%.
Deployment of GridAware to optimise asset inspections, the first tool to be
deployed from our partnership with X (Google’s innovation lab) and Tapestry,
its energy moonshot.
55% carbon emissions reduction achieved against a goal of 53.5%. This was
set in 2020, to reach by FY2030
3
.
Vector Group (NZX: VCT) today announced solid financial results, and continued investment
into the reliability and resilience of the electricity network.
Vector Group Chief Executive Simon Mackenzie said, “The year’s financial result sees
adjusted earnings for the group before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation (adjusted
EBITDA
1
), for continuing operations, up 16% to $401.1 million. Total capital expenditure for
1
EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are non-GAAP measures which the directors and
management believe provide useful information as they are used internally to evaluate
performance of business units, to establish operational goals and to allocate resources.
Adjusted EBITDA excludes the capital contributions customers pay for new connections
on the network. See the financial statements for further details or click on this link to see
Vector’s policy.
2
The dividend will be paid to shareholders who are on the register at 5 September, with
payment made on 17 September.
3
The target set in FY2020 was to reduce scope 1 and 2 emissions (excluding electricity
distribution losses) by 53.5% by FY2030 from an FY2020 baseline. The emissions
reduction target does not rely on any offsets.
market release
25 August 2025
creating a new energy future
continuing operations was $470.1 million, down $29.1 million, reflecting a number of factors
including the timing of large projects. Group net profit after tax was $154.7 million, inclusive
of a $37 million impairment of our gas distribution business, following forecasts in our gas
asset management plan that show total connections starting to decline from FY26, as a
result of significant market uncertainty, scarcity of gas and rising costs. Following the
impairment the carrying value of the gas distribution business is consistent with the
estimated value of the regulated asset base”.
The board has determined an unimputed final dividend of 13 cents per share, taking the full
year dividend to 25 cents per share. This represents an 85% payout of free cash flow, in the
mid-point of the 70-100% range as stated in our policy. Shareholders should not interpret this
year’s payout as being an indication that future dividends will be in the midpoint of the range.
“Our business portfolio has continued to evolve. The completion of the sales of Natural Gas
Trading, Vector Ongas and our shareholding in Liquigas, are examples of successful
transactions that align with the risk and future operating environment of each business. The
completed transactions enable us to concentrate on the core strengths and demands of our
regulated electricity and gas networks and explore growth opportunities such as through
Vector Technology Solutions, or our investment in metering business Bluecurrent.
“On 1 August, after balance date for these results, Vector announced via the NZX the sale of
HRV.
“We’ve seen some changes to our regulatory settings in the year. As of 1 April 2025, we
entered into the new five-yearly regulatory cycle for electricity networks, as set by the
Commerce Commission. This is known as DPP4. We’re well placed to continue our
investment approach, which is to avoid committing to high levels of capital investment in
areas where there is significant uncertainty, or to cover short demand peaks when there are
other, less capital intensive ways to use available capacity and build network resilience.
“We’ve also seen some decisions announced by the Electricity Authority on connection
processes. We support efforts to streamline and clarify these processes and we remain
creating a new energy future
committed to advocating for reforms that are fair, efficient, and do not impose undue costs on
existing customers.
“We await with great interest the release of the Frontier report which the Government has
commissioned to help with its review into the electricity market. Vector has taken an active
interest in the process and will continue to provide input into important issues such as
security of supply, and an efficient market for customers.
“The DPP4 regulatory cycle for electricity distribution networks has seen electricity network
assets being repriced by the Commerce Commission to reflect higher interest rates and
COVID-19 inflation impacts. This has resulted in price increases, which we recognise is hard
on all consumers, however in real terms our electricity lines charges remain very similar to
what they were more than ten years ago.
“Our commitment to Auckland’s growth and electrification remains strong, and the region
continues to grow despite the broader economic slowdown. While we’ve seen a softening in
the rate of new connections this year, and fewer private electric vehicles being sold, we’re
continuing to work closely with customers to ensure we understand, prepare for, and enable
their evolving needs.
“In 2020, we set a target to reduce direct emissions (Scope 1 and 2, excluding electrical line
losses) by 53.5% by 2030, aligned with the Science Based Targets initiative to limit warming
to below 1.5C. This year we recorded a reduction of 55%, which is calculated against the
businesses we have now
4
. This result was driven by innovation in technology and processes,
with successful initiatives now embedded in our operations. We’ll continue to focus on our
emissions targets and we recognise there could be some volatility in maintaining and
improving our overall emissions.”
4
Due to the completion of the sales of Vector Ongas, our shareholding in Liquigas, and
some natural gas trading contracts, our historic emissions inventory has been
recalculated to exclude these emissions. This enables our year-to-year results to reflect
our actual emission reductions. For more on the methodology, see our greenhouse gas
emissions inventory report, at vector.co.nz/reports.
creating a new energy future
Key financial and operational information
Business segment FY24 FY25 % change
Electricity
- Revenue excluding contributions
- Adjusted EBITDA
- Total connections
$687.4m
$295.1m
624,330
$762.2m
$351.9m
632,106
+11%
+19%
+1%
Gas Distribution
- Revenue excluding contributions
- Adjusted EBITDA
- Total connections
$65.1m
$44.8m
120,354
$67.2m
$46.7m
120,621
+3%
+4%
+0%
ENDS
Further details can be read in Vector’s annual report. This along with our climate-related
disclosures report, and greenhouse gas emissions inventory report are available here:
vector.co.nz/reports.
Investor contact
Jason Hollingworth, Chief Financial Officer, Vector
Jason.hollingworth@vector.co.nz, 021 312 928
Media contact
Matthew Britton, Communications Manager, Vector
Matthew.britton@vector.co.nz, 021 224 2966
About Vector
Vector is an innovative New Zealand energy company, delivering energy and communication
services to more than 630,000 residential and commercial customers across New Zealand.
Vector has a leading role in creating a new energy future through its Symphony strategy which
puts customers at the heart of the energy system. Vector is listed on the New Zealand Stock
Exchange with ticker symbol VCT. Our majority shareholder, with voting rights of 75.1%, is
Entrust. For further information, visit www.vector.co.nz.
---
Smart moves
ANNUAL REPORT 2025
Smart starts
with people
In today’s constantly changing
energy landscape, Vector is
focused on delivering what
Kiwi homes and businesses
rely on every day: safe, reliable,
resilient and affordable energy
infrastructure. We’re using smart
technology and innovation to
do this for our customers.
1
Investing
in a smarter
system
2
Vector Annual Report 2025
We’re investing in critical
infrastructure, both physical
and digital, and we’re
sharpening our focus on
data and insights, to boost
resilience in the face of
climate change, empower
our customers, and support
economic growth.
3
As we transition to an
electrified future, we’re
making a series of smart
moves to deliver affordability,
accessibility and reliability,
because this matters more
than ever to our customers
and the country.
Powering
a smarter
future
4
Vector Annual Report 2025
About this report
This report, dated 22 August 2025, is a review of Vector’s financial
and operational performance for the year ended 30 June 2025.
The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with
appropriate accounting standards and have been independently
audited by KPMG.
The financial and operational information has been compiled in line
with NZX Listing Rules and recommendations for investor reporting.
The report has drawn from a wide range of information sources. This
includes: our stakeholders, customers, communities, sustainability
framework, value drivers, risk register, board reports, asset
management plan, financial statements and our operational reports.
Performance snapshot6
Chair and group chief executive report8
Environmental, social and governance (ESG)
People, health and safety
Sustainability
12
14
18
Business segment reports
Electricity
Gas distribution
20
22
24
Vector Technology Solutions (VTS)25
Governance report26
Remuneration report36
Who we are
Our board
Our management team
Entrust, majority shareholder of Vector
44
46
48
50
Other disclosures
Operating statistics
Five-year financial performance
Non-GAAP financial information
51
52
53
55
Financials
Financial statements
Notes to the financial statements
Independent auditor’s report
56
57
63
104
Statutory information
Financial calendar and directory
109
118
Contents
This annual report is published as part of a reporting
suite, which also includes our climate-related disclosures
report and greenhouse gas emissions inventory report.
All three reports are available at vector.co.nz.
CLIMATE-RELATED
DISCLOSURES
2025
2025 REPORTING SUITE
Smart moves
ANNUAL REPORT 2025
GREENHOUSE
GAS EMISSIONS
INVENTORY
REPORT 2025
5
Performance snapshot
Financial and operational dashboard
INDICATORPERFORMANCE AND NOTES
Dividend25 cents per share full-year dividend
New dividend policy linked to cash flow and aligned
with five-yearly regulatory cycle (available at
vector.co.nz/investors/dividends)
Capital expenditure$470.1 million for continuing operations
Adjusted EBITDA
1
$401.1 million for continuing operations, up 16%
Profit$154.7 million net profit after tax
INDICATORPERFORMANCE AND NOTES
Electricity connections632,106
Gas connections120,621
Electricity resilience
and reliability
>2,000 km of network inspected by drones
12 projects completed to boost resilience and future
capacity in Auckland
INDICATORPERFORMANCE AND NOTES
Smart meter data intervals1.7 billion data intervals assessed on Diverge
platform, applying market rules to ensure accuracy,
processed significantly faster than previous systems
Customer engagement10,577 completed surveys or interviews with
customers, providing direct feedback on our
services, complementing further insights from
conversational analytics
Network inspections More than 43,000 power poles inspected using
130,000 images, along with artificial intelligence to
survey and assess condition
1. EBITDA from continuing operations adjusted for fair value changes, associates, third-party contributions, and significant one-off gains, losses, revenues and/
or expenses. Refer to the Non-GAAP reconciliation on page 55. Adjusted EBITDA excludes the capital contributions customers pay for new connections on the
network.
SHAREHOLDER:
CUSTOMER:
DATA:
Vector Annual Report 20256
Performance snapshot
ESG dashboard
Governance
– we disclose comprehensive governance information on page 26.
INDICATORPERFORMANCE AND NOTES
2030 carbon emissions
reduction target (scope 1 and 2,
excluding electricity line losses)
Achieved target five years early (55% emissions
reductions achieved in FY2025)
Scope 3 emissions744, 316 tCO
2
e (55% reduction from FY2020 baseline)
Internal carbon price$140 per tCO
2
e
Climate resilience investmentAround $300 million in climate resilience projects
in our 2025 electricity asset management plan,
including more than 50 resilience projects or
programmes of work
Electric vehicles54,135 electric vehicles on our network,
up 5,703 from FY2024
INDICATORPERFORMANCE AND NOTES
Talent pipeline64 critical roles identified, as part of our talent
pipeline development strategy
Future talent strategic collaborations established
with 3 organisations
Development and succession planning underway
Leadership development78% of people leaders attended at least
one development activity
CommunityHome energy saver programme completed on 724
households in collaboration with Auckland Council
Contractor safetyQuarterly workshops with contractors to support
an open learning environment
ENVIRONMENT:
SOCIAL:
7
Performance snapshot
Chair and group
chief executive report
New Zealand’s energy landscape has been
extremely dynamic over the past year
as a consequence of challenges such as
severe weather events, affordability, and
scrutiny on sector performance, and its
importance to businesses and households.
Alongside this, global trends for the
energy sector continue to take shape and
require agility, like technology and digital
innovation, evolving customer demand
patterns and behaviour. We’re engaging
consistently with the Government as
they, and regulators, execute reviews into
the structure, performance, and rules of
the energy sector. It’s critical that the
right policy and settings are in place to
enable the industry to manage the energy
transition effectively, and it’s clear that
change from the status quo is needed.
Our Symphony strategy remains focused on putting
the customer at the centre of our decisions. We’re
acutely aware of the importance of getting the balance
right between affordability and prudent, efficient
investment given the cost-of-living pressure many
of our customers are facing.
Our focus remains on providing a reliable, resilient,
secure energy supply and our long-term planning to
do this is influenced by rapid technological change
and shifting customer behaviour. We’ve responded
by thinking beyond traditional solutions and grasping
the opportunities that come with these developments.
We continue to focus on innovation, embracing AI,
harnessing data, and deepening our understanding
of customer needs, now and into the future.
Our business portfolio has continued to evolve. The
completion of the sales of Natural Gas Trading, Vector
Ongas and our shareholding in Liquigas are examples
of successful transactions that align with the risk and
future operating environment of each business. The
completed transactions enable us to concentrate on the
core strengths and demands of our regulated electricity
and gas networks and explore growth opportunities,
such as through Vector Technology Solutions (VTS), or
our investment in metering business Bluecurrent.
On 1 August, after balance date for these results,
Vector announced via the New Zealand Stock Exchange
(NZX) the sale of HRV.
In the reporting period, our new five-yearly default price
quality path (DPP4) for the electricity network has taken
effect, on 1 April 2025. We’ve valued the engagement
we’ve had with the Commerce Commission as they
worked through this important regulatory milestone,
and we’re pleased to see recognition of the importance of
several of our long-standing focus areas, such as uplifts in
provisions for cyber resilience and customer engagement,
and an expanded innovation allowance scheme.
We’re well placed to continue our investment approach
under the new DPP, which is to avoid committing to
high levels of capital investment in areas where there
is significant uncertainty, or to cover short demand
peaks when there are other, less capital-intensive ways
to use available capacity and build network resilience.
What this means is that we’ve prioritised how we invest
capital to areas where we can have the most impact on
customers. For example, in the past year we’ve inspected
more than 2,000 km of network using drones, and
completed 12 projects to boost resilience and future
capacity in the CBD.
Our commitment to Auckland’s growth and electrification
remains strong, and the region continues to grow despite
the broader economic slowdown. While we’ve seen a
softening in the rate of new connections this year, and
fewer private electric vehicles being sold, Auckland is
experiencing rising demand for hyperscale data centre
connections, each with significant energy requirements
(see Data Centres on p10).
In 2020, we set a target to reduce direct emissions
(scope 1 and 2, excluding electricity line losses) by 53.5%
by 2030, aligned with the Science Based Targets initiative
(SBTi) to limit warming to below 1.5°C. This year we
recorded a reduction of 55%, which is calculated against
the businesses we have now, meaning it reflects our
actual emissions reductions, not those from businesses
we’ve sold. This was driven by innovation in technology
and processes, which were mapped on our publicly
available carbon cost abatement curve, and which
we’ve progressively actioned. While some efforts fell
short, others are now embedded in our operations –
such as our gas sniffer trucks which proactively locate
leaks on our gas distribution network. We’ll continue to
focus on our emissions targets and we recognise there
could be some volatility in maintaining and improving
our overall emissions.
Vector Annual Report 20258
Chair and group chief executive report
Group financial performance
1
Earnings
FY2025 adjusted earnings before interest, tax, depreciation
and amortisation (adjusted EBITDA
2
) for continuing
operations were up $55.8 million or 16% to $401.1 million.
Capital contributions from customers for new connections
are excluded from our adjusted EBITDA figure. Our new
five-year regulatory price period began on 1 April 2025,
resulting in higher revenue in the final quarter to 30 June
2025, in line with the uplift provided by the Commerce
Commission under the new DPP; this reflects the increase
in interest rates and inflation experienced within the prior
DPP3 period. We’ve also maintained prudent financial
management across the group.
Profit
Group net profit after tax for continuing operations was
$154.7 million, inclusive of a $37 million impairment of
the gas distribution business. Underlying profit, excluding
the impairment, was $191.7 million. The impairment
recognises our latest forecasts for gas network connections,
where we see a decline in net connections from FY2026,
as a result of significant market uncertainty, scarcity of gas
and rising costs. Following the impairment, the carrying
value of the gas distribution business is consistent with
the estimated value of the regulated asset base.
DOUG MCKAY
CHAIR
SIMON MACKENZIE
GROUP CHIEF EXECUTIVE
1. During the financial year, we completed the sale of the businesses within
our prior Gas Trading segment, including Natural Gas Trading (1 July 2024),
Ongas (31 January 2025) and Liquigas (31 January 2025). These businesses
have been classified as discontinued operations in these full-year results.
2. EBITDA from continuing operations adjusted for fair value changes,
associates, third-party contributions, and significant one-off gains, losses,
revenues and/or expenses. Refer to the Non-GAAP reconciliation on page 55.
SYMPHONY STRATEGY
As we’ve noted in our previous annual reports,
our Symphony strategy helps us navigate and
shape the energy transition, aiming to deliver a
more efficient network that is reliable, safe and
ready for the future, recognising the challenge of
affordability. There are five pillars to Symphony:
leading the New Zealand energy transition;
evolving our core infrastructure; embracing data
and insights; putting our customers at the heart;
and investing in our people. During the past year
we’ve seen continued progress under each of
these pillars.
Chair and group chief executive report
9
These forecasts reflect the unprecedented uncertainty
around the future of natural gas, driven in the near
term by significant market uncertainty, scarcity of
gas and rising costs, and in the long term by lack of
clarity over how gas distribution businesses will be
impacted by New Zealand’s 2050 net-zero emissions
targets. Current regulatory settings were designed in a
more stable environment, where demand for gas was
growing, and we are urging the Commerce Commission
to update these to recognise this uncertainty and
ensure any shift away from gas protects the interests
of consumers and other stakeholders. A new draft gas
DPP is expected to be announced by the Commission
in November 2025 (with a final DPP announced in May
2026), and we are participating fully in the process so
the Commission understands our perspective both
for investors and customers.
Capital expenditure
Total capital expenditure for continuing operations was
$470.1 million, down $29.1 million, reflecting a number
of factors including the timing of large projects. Within
this capital expenditure we recognised $210.5 million
of capital contributions from customers, which is up
$15.2 million on the year before.
Dividend
As we announced in our half-year results in February
2025, the board has approved revisions to the dividend
policy, linking to cash flow. The intent is to align the
policy with the Commerce Commission’s five-yearly
regulatory cycle, as this is a large part of what determines
our revenue and earnings in each five-year period.
The board has determined an unimputed final dividend
of 13 cents per share, taking the full year dividend to
25 cents per share. This represents an 85% payout of
free cash flow, in the mid-point of the 70-100% range as
stated in our policy. Shareholders should not interpret
this year’s payout as being an indication that future
dividends will be in the midpoint of the range.
STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIPS FOR
INNOVATION
An example of embracing strategic partnerships
to innovate for better customer outcomes is the
expansion of GridAware, a new AI tool that is
reinventing the way we inspect and maintain the
electricity network. This project, developed as part
of our partnership with X (Google’s innovation lab)
and Tapestry, X’s energy moonshot, complements
the Grid Planning Tool for Distribution, another
AI tool from Tapestry that aims to transform
our forward planning by enabling much faster
scenario testing for future impacts such as EV
uptake, rooftop solar and data centre growth. How
GridAware helps boost efficiency in our network
maintenance programme is set out on page 23.
The Commerce Commission has acknowledged
the customer benefit from this innovative project,
awarding us an Innovation Project Allowance for
the GridAware project within the regulatory year to
31 March 2025.
DATA CENTRES
Auckland is experiencing rising demand for
hyperscale data centre connections, each with
significant energy requirements. These complex
projects offer major opportunities for the region,
and for New Zealand more broadly. For example,
hyperscale data centres typically request 20 Mega
Volt-Amperes (MVA) in the first phase of multi-
stage developments, which is roughly equivalent
to 8,000 homes. However, they are accompanied
by uncertainty about the rate at which electricity
demand will grow to meet the capacity requested,
since this depends on the adoption of data centre
services by the data centre’s clients. We know
these hyperscale data centre requests will drive
a need for us to invest in system growth, but we
must ensure our investment is moving in step
with demand. Because of the scale of some of
these projects, their impacts may not be confined
just to our distribution network, and may also
affect electricity generation and transmission;
so, careful and coordinated planning is critical.
Business performance
With the successful completion of a number of
transactions, we’re now reporting financial results under
a new segment structure: electricity performance is
detailed on page 22 and gas distribution on page 24.
Our investment in Bluecurrent has performed in line
with expectations, with distributions received from the
investment recognised in our financial statements within
cash flows.
We’re continuing to improve our cyber security
capabilities and make these available to others via our
Equalise product offering, with further sign-ups in the
New Zealand electricity distribution sector occurring
during the past year.
Vector Fibre has performed to expectations and is the
subject of a previously announced strategic review, with
Barrenjoey Capital Partners assisting in the process.
Highlights from the year for VTS are set out on page 25.
Electricity network regulatory performance
Our regulatory performance year runs to 31 March and
includes measures that track the reliability of service we
provide to our customers. In the most recent regulatory
period, the 12 months to 31 March 2025, our network
performance was within the regulatory limits for reliability,
for both planned service interruptions (for example, where
we shut power off temporarily to do work on the network
safely) and unplanned service interruptions (for example,
where a car hits a power pole and disables power until we
can repair it).
In the first three months of the current regulatory
period, 1 April to 30 June 2025, the Auckland region
once again experienced a significant weather event with
Cyclone Tam, which delivered torrential rain and severe
storms, followed by an intense and damaging lightning
storm. These conditions caused widespread disruption,
including power outages for our customers, and placed
considerable pressure on our network operations.
Unplanned service interruptions in this quarter were
higher than for the previous period, largely because of
the impact from this event.
Vector Annual Report 202510
Chair and group chief executive report
Regulatory reform and market structure
Recent decisions by the Electricity Authority on
connection processes mark a shift in how new
electricity network connections will be managed. We
support efforts to streamline and clarify these processes
and remain committed to advocating for reforms that
are fair, efficient and do not impose unexpected costs
on existing customers.
We await with great interest the release of the Frontier
report which the Government has commissioned to help
with its review into the electricity market. Vector has
taken an active interest in the process and will continue
to provide input into important issues such as security
of supply, and an efficient market for customers.
The DPP4 regulatory cycle for electricity distribution
networks has seen electricity network assets being
repriced by the Commerce Commission to reflect
higher interest rates and COVID-19 inflation impacts.
This has resulted in price increases, which we recognise
is hard on all consumers, however in real terms our
electricity lines charges remain very similar to what
they were more than ten years ago.
Looking ahead
We are strongly committed to helping lead
New Zealand’s energy transformation, using data
and AI to bring together commercial, customer and
operational insights, and drive better outcomes.
This view is shaping how we plan, invest and serve our
customers. We’re building our own AI capability and
attracting strong interest from applicants eager to join
our team. Our people are becoming more sophisticated
in using these tools, learning from global best practice
and applying it to local challenges.
CEO DEPARTURE
In February we announced that group chief executive
Simon Mackenzie had decided to step down.
Mr Mackenzie will depart his role at the end of 2025.
Mr Mackenzie has been Vector’s group chief
executive since 2008. In that time he has led the
development and growth of competitive businesses
such as Vector Metering (now Bluecurrent) and
Ongas, delivering significant shareholder value;
forged unique partnerships with AWS and Tapestry,
the energy moonshot at X (Google’s innovation lab)
to harness the use of technology and data; overseen
the investment in the electricity and gas networks
to meet Auckland’s growth and adapt to the impacts
of climate change; driven a culture of innovation
including participation in trials of early technologies
such as solar and batteries; grew the Vector portfolio
through acquisitions of competitive businesses
and divested for value creation and strategic
alignment; and set up VTS to pursue opportunities
in New Zealand and globally.
In announcing his departure, Mr Mackenzie said,
“The time is right for me to hand over – with Vector
in a strong position financially, and a great culture,
innovative mindset and talented leadership across
the business.”
The board thanks Mr Mackenzie for his years of
service to Vector and its shareholders. Board chair
Doug McKay said that Mr Mackenzie’s contribution
and achievements have been significant: “Simon is an
outstanding chief executive and a highly respected
Vector and industry leader. He has successfully led
Vector’s regulated and competitive businesses in a
complex environment and has contributed to the
wider energy industry through his leadership and
extensive sector experience. The board wishes him
well for the future and is grateful for his ongoing
support while the recruitment process continues.”
A recruitment process is currently underway and
the market will be updated when an appointment
is made.
We’re proud to partner with globally innovating
organisations, such as X, the moonshot factory, giving
our teams access to cutting-edge expertise and
collaborative learning. These partnerships are helping
us deepen our culture of innovation, which is grounded
in curiosity, capability and customer focus. It’s not just
about technology; it’s also about mindset, culture and the
way we work together to enable a smarter, more resilient
energy future.
Doug McKay
Chair
Simon Mackenzie
Group Chief Executive
11
Chair and group chief executive report
Environmental,
Social and
Governance
(ESG)
Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG)
12
Vector Annual Report 2025
Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG)
13
People, health and safety
Our Symphony strategy calls for
innovation and new solutions
to meet the challenges of an
increasingly complex energy
system, where demand for key
skills such as engineering, digital
and data is increasing significantly.
This is happening not just across
other energy companies within
New Zealand but globally too.
Traditional engineering is still vital
to our industry, but we must add
new capabilities to maximise the
opportunities ahead. Recognising
and staying ahead of this skill
adaptation is the basis for our people
strategy, and we’ve continued to
make progress this year.
Symphony capabilities
In our 2024 annual report we noted
the introduction of new behaviours
that supported a need to evolve
the way we work. This year, we’ve
built on these behaviours by going
further and identifying the specific
capabilities needed to deliver our
Symphony strategy, drawing on
our behaviours, global skills trends
and the critical skills needed for the
energy transition.
This has created a strong framework
for a structured approach to
strategic workforce planning, where
we’ve begun mapping the skills
and competencies of our current
workforce, identifying gaps at both
individual and functional levels,
and developing plans to address
these gaps through strategic
training, upskilling and recruitment
as vacancies become available.
We identified about 10% of roles
across Vector as critical to our core
operations, strategic goals, revenue,
compliance, and operational
continuity, and we’re focused on
ensuring there is a strong talent
pipeline for these roles.
“ The support from the
team, the open
communication, and the
overall work environment
have all contributed to a
very positive experience.
I feel valued and
motivated, and I
appreciate the
opportunities to grow
and contribute.’’
Employee feedback from Vector’s
eNPS survey
Vector Annual Report 202514
People, health and safety
Talent and leadership
development
We’ve continued a strong focus on
talent development this year, with a
multi-layered leadership programme
for new, seasoned and senior leaders
supporting the development of
leadership competencies and team
member coaching capabilities. We
had strong participation this year,
with 78% of our people leaders
taking part in development activities.
We complement this by strategic
collaborations with corporate learning
providers to design programmes to
our specific needs and run talks with
global and local speakers to engage
and upskill our people.
Strengthening our talent
pipeline
We’re proactively building a diverse
and talented pipeline of people who
want to come and work for us and
are engaged and motivated when
vacancies arise. We’re doing this with
a particular focus on specialist roles
in engineering, digital and data that
are critical to the energy transition.
Our approach includes building
relationships with universities in
support of a dynamic graduate
programme focused on strategic
capability, as well as looking further
back than recent graduates to target
talent who may still be deciding
which qualifications they want to
acquire and which fields to enter.
We’ve joined the Aruhiko Power
Engineering Excellence Trust, which
encourages students in the field of
power systems engineering with
scholarships, experiences in the
field and connections with industry
employers. We’ve also engaged in an
internship programme with Stanford
University, hosting two interns
from the Stanford Doerr School of
Sustainability. This programme was
implemented with the support of the
University of Auckland.
We recognise that the energy sector
as a whole is going through a skills
transition, and so we also participate
in industry collaborations, where
relevant for Vector and where we’re
confident we can advance our
specific needs.
Vector, along with 10 other
companies, is on the steering
committee for the electricity sector
member association, the Electricity
Engineering Association’s (EEA) Re-
Energise workforce initiative, which
focuses on preparing the workforce
for the energy transition. This project
will provide strategic and actionable
recommendations to ensure the
industry is ready to meet future
challenges and technologies.
Driving performance excellence
Our performance management
framework is focused on clarity
of direction, acknowledging our
people’s performance and reinforcing
our culture. We run a 12-month
performance management cycle with
a mid-year check-in.
To support consistency of end-of-
year reviews and ratings, we hold
calibration sessions across the
business. Employees and managers
are evaluated not only on what
they delivered but also on how they
delivered it, informed by Vector’s
behaviours.
FROM STANFORD
TO VECTOR
This winter, Vector welcomed two
interns from Stanford University.
The internship came about after
Stanford’s School of Sustainability,
together with All Birds founder
Tim Brown, went looking to
connect students with purpose-
driven companies around the
world. Four organisations were
chosen to host interns, including
Vector. Hosting interns from
top universities generates fresh
ideas and perspectives and is
a great way to showcase our
culture and the opportunities
on offer for career development.
The interns’ projects feed into
Vector’s strategic direction with
a focus on electricity demand-
response policies around the
globe, and understanding to
what extent time-of-use plans
change Aucklanders’ electricity
consumption.
“ The coaching is
definitely pushing my
thinking in both
professional and
personal development.’’
A people leader’s feedback about one
of Vector’s leadership development
programmes
15
People, health and safety
Engagement and wellbeing
In the past year our three regular
surveys, which are employee
engagement, employee Net
Promoter Score (eNPS), and wellbeing,
were all above benchmarks. Our
engagement programme is informed
by data and shaped by what our
people are telling us, and so these
results are a significant validation of
our approach and its contribution
towards our positive culture where
our people are supported to do their
best work. In our engagement survey
this year, 87% of our people said they
are proud to work for Vector.
Health safety and
environmental (HSE)
Ensuring the health and safety of our
staff, those delivering work on our
behalf and the public is paramount
at Vector. We’re committed to
continuous improvement of our health
and safety culture and performance
and we’re proud of the progress we’ve
made to support this in the past year.
This includes: scheduled quarterly
safety forums with our key contracting
partners to promote an open learning
environment focused on the most
important preventative measures to
minimise harm, enhancing in-field
critical risk control verifications and
embedding a new HSE Incident
Management System to better track
corrective actions, and improvements
in shared learning from high potential
events to ensure insights are identified
and critical controls continue to be
improved. We’ve also consulted
with key internal stakeholders and
contracting partners to inform the
revision of our HSE system.
These initiatives have contributed to
a reduction in both Lost Time Injury
Frequency Rate (LTIFR) and Total
Recordable Injury Frequency Rate
(TRIFR) compared to the year before,
and to the introduction of measurable
critical risk lead indicators for the
coming year. For the past 12 months,
the LTRIFR was 3.0 and the TRIFR 6.9
(these figures include HRV, which
was sold after balance date).
A robust audit and assurance
programme supports our approach
which includes internal first – and
second – line defence activity, third-
party assessment and retaining
our ISO accreditation in ISO45001
Health and Safety Management
Systems, ISO14001 Environmental
Management Systems and NZS7901
Public Safety.
“ Vector has demonstrated a strategic and data-driven
approach to employee wellbeing and psychosocial
risk management. Through our long-standing
partnership with them and annual wellbeing Pulse
surveys (2022 to 2025), they’ve shown consistent
improvements in resilience, organisational support,
and key work factors. Since their 2022 psychosocial
risk assessment, their practices have matured
significantly, with ongoing refinement and iteration.
Their commitment is evident in both leadership
engagement and staff feedback, positioning them
as a proactive leader in the wellbeing space. While
challenges remain, their continuous efforts to
improve are commendable and reflect a genuine
investment in their people. It is a privilege to work
with leaders who truly care about their people, are
eager to learn how to support mental health, and
are committed to helping others when they see
someone struggling.”
Dr Dougal Sutherland, Principal Psychologist, Umbrella Wellbeing
ANNUAL EMPLOYEE
SATISFACTION
SURVEY RESULTS
BENCHMARK
AMONG GLOBAL
ENERGY COMPANIES VECTOR RESULT
Employee engagement 70%
Above benchmark
eNPS (Net Promoter Score)15
Above benchmark
Vector Annual Report 202516
People, health and safety
EMPLOYEES BY ETHNICITYEMPLOYEES BY AGEEMPLOYEES BY GENDER
There were no notable movements in the year, apart from a 3% increase in the proportion of female employees following
the sale of Ongas.
* Middle East, Latin America and Africa.
11.5%
20-29
28.9%
30-39
29.1%
40-49
18.4%
50-59
10.3%
60+
1.9%
UNKNOWN
35.4%
FEMALE
64.1%
MALE
0.5%
UNDISCLOSED
31%
18%
25%
3%
2%
5%
12%
4%
ASIAN
NZ EUROPEAN
NZ
MĀORI
OTHER
PASIFIKA
UNKNOWN
EUROPEAN
MELAA*
Engagement and advocacy
We’ve been active in raising
awareness and advocating on health
and safety matters this year, making
a joint submission on the proposed
Health and Safety at Work Act reform
in conjunction with the Business
Leaders’ Health and Safety Forum,
an organisation we’re a founding
member of.
We’ve continued public engagement
around key aspects of safety
associated with our assets, business
activities and worksites. Examples of
these include our public awareness
campaigns, together with targeted
stakeholder engagement, around
keeping safe when working near
electricity or gas assets – for example
when digging near electrical or gas
assets, working at height near power
lines and what to do if you encounter
downed power lines.
We’ve also been advocating strongly
to raise awareness of the minimum
safe distances from overhead lines for
new building activity, as set out in the
New Zealand Electrical Code of Practice
for Electrical Safe Distances (ECP34). The
issue of lack of awareness is becoming
increasingly concerning because we’ve
observed a rise in non-compliance since
recent intensification planning rule
changes have enabled building closer
to property boundaries. We’re working
constructively with the planning and
building industries to raise awareness
of the issue, but our view is that more
needs to be done to address this safety
issue. A common-sense approach would
see the safe distances included in the
Building Code, as today a building project
can receive a valid building and resource
consent but still be non-compliant with
ECP34. We’re advocating for this solution
with the Government because of our
serious concerns about safety.
CHALLENGE YOURSELF
Our series of Vector-wide “challenge
yourself” events were designed to
support upskilling in digital and data
by getting people excited, inspired and
curious about how they could make
better use of it in their roles. With
a strong focus on cross-functional
collaboration, our first event saw
teams come together to solve a series
of data-driven clues by applying data
insights in creative ways. For the
second event (pictured), we hosted a
series of rapid-fire conversations where
data leads and people from around
the business would talk through data
challenges and solutions.
17
People, health and safety
Sustainability
Vector is a climate reporting entity under the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013 and
is required to produce climate statements that comply with the Aotearoa New Zealand
Climate Standards (NZCS) 1, 2 and 3 issued by the External Reporting Board (XRB).
Our climate-related disclosures report considers
our climate-related risks and opportunities,
and, together with this annual report and our
greenhouse gas emissions inventory report,
comprises our annual reporting suite, available at
vector.co.nz/investors/reports.
Resilience
As climate change drives more extreme and damaging
weather, it’s even more critical that our electricity
infrastructure is resilient. Through the work we’ve done
with external climate scientists to understand physical
climate changes, together with our own expertise in
assessing the impact on our assets, we can develop
optional pathways for improved performance against
climate impacts. But each of these optional pathways
comes at additional cost. While our approach to
resilience investment aims to remove the most risk with
the lowest capital expenditure, we’re thinking ahead
about where and how more resilience could be built,
and how the costs of doing so could be met.
In this context we were pleased this year to see the
Government’s decisions on the long-awaited reform of
the tree trimming regulations. The changes will improve
the ability of electricity distribution businesses to assess
and manage hazardous trees around lines, and issue
notices requiring that they be removed by their owner.
This will help us protect our lines from trees, and so
protect our customers’ electricity supply; however,
the cost recovery challenges of tree trimming remain
unaddressed following these changes.
Carbon emissions
2030 emissions reduction target
In FY2021 we set an absolute emissions reduction
target, aligned with a methodology published by the
Science Based Target initiative (SBTi) at the time, though
not validated by the SBTi. That target is for Vector to
reduce its scope 1 and 2 emissions (excluding electricity
distribution losses) by 53.5% by FY2030 from an FY2020
baseline. The emissions reduction target does not rely
on any offsets.
This year, we achieved a 55% emissions reduction, hitting
our 2030 target five years early. While we’re proud of
this outcome, we’re resetting our focus on maintaining
these reductions and beginning to look beyond 2030
for further opportunities to reduce emissions in a
cost-efficient way. Main contributors to our emissions
reductions have been a decrease in methane leaks on
our gas pipelines through proactive surveying, and a
reduction in diesel generation in planned maintenance
projects. For more information, please refer to our
greenhouse gas emissions inventory report available at
vector.co.nz/reports.
Vector Annual Report 202518
Sustainability
1. Market-based method for electricity consumption. For further information on where market-based and location-based electricity emissions are included, see our
greenhouse gas emissions inventory report, available at vector.co.nz/reports.
Emissions inventory
Vector’s total emissions (including Scope 3 and including
electricity distribution losses) have also decreased by
54% since our base year FY2020. This is mainly because
of a wind-down of Vector’s Natural Gas Trading contracts,
and a reduction in natural gas consumption in the
Auckland region.
EMISSIONS
REDUCTIONS
TABLE
FY2020
(BASE YEAR)
FY2025CHANGE
Scope 122,93310,449-54%
Scope 2
1
33,08739,476 19%
Scope 31,656,403744,316 -55%
Total1,712,423794,241-54%
Due to the completion of the sales of Vector Ongas,
our shareholding in Liquigas, and some natural gas
trading contracts, our historic emissions inventory has
been recalculated to exclude these emissions. For more
information on the methodology, results, and emissions
recalculations over time, please see our greenhouse gas
emissions inventory report, at vector.co.nz/reports.
Emissions abatement for our scope 1 and 2
emissions target
In FY2022 we developed a carbon abatement cost curve
to help measure and understand our emissions reduction
targets (scope 1 and 2 excluding electricity distribution
losses) and actions available to Vector to contribute to
reaching those targets. This work identifies the financial
impact of potential carbon reduction activity across
scope 1 and 2 emissions, using an internal carbon cost
of $140 per tonne of carbon dioxide equivalent (tCO
2
e)
as a comparative ‘do nothing’ cost. This cost curve
was updated in the past year to reflect the progress
we’ve made.
Abatement
cost
$/tCO₂e/year
Abatement
potential
tCO₂e
Using mobile transformers as
opposed to diesel generators for
multi-day upgrades (2024)
Hybrid generator (in trial)
Transition remaining light
vehicle fleet to EV (2020 – 2027)
Transition vans and utes to
electric (when available)
3-month gas pipeline surveying (2027)
Vector headquarters to ‘6 Green Star’
building (2023)
Annual gas pipeline
surveying (2022)
6-month gas pipeline surveying (2024)
SF6
monitoring
Renewable-only
electricity (2023)
Uncosted emissions
Third-party
gas pipeline
damage
Public engagement on dial
before you dig (2023)
Completed
In progress
Planned
Other
fugitive
methane
Other
diesel
generation
$140/
tCO₂e
53.5%
Emissions
reduction
target
3-month high-pressure gas
pipeline surveying (2025)
Reducing unnecessary diesel
generation through process
optimisation (2021)
$0
-$1,000
-$2,000
$1,000
19
Sustainability
Business
segment
reports
Business segment reports
20
Vector Annual Report 2025
21
Business segment reports
Electricity
Adjusted EBITDA
Electricity adjusted EBITDA is up
$56.8 million or 19% to $351.9 million.
This result was driven by the
higher revenue, owing to pricing
adjustments and as a result of the
new DPP period which began on
1 April 2025, as well as because of
higher pass-through and recoverable
costs. Total operating expenses,
excluding pass-through charges,
were flat. This reflects our ongoing
commitment to efficient network
management.
Connection growth
Network connection numbers
have continued to grow, with total
electricity connections up 1.2% to
632,106. The rate of growth has
declined, with new connections 21.4%
lower than for the previous year, given
the broader economic slowdown.
Volumes
Electricity distributed volume was
down 1.4% compared to FY2024.
This largely correlates with warmer
temperatures in FY2025, with fewer
days when electricity was used
for heating.
Capital investment
Gross capital investment was
$25 million lower than for the last
12 months, at $432 million, reflecting
a number of factors including the
timing of large projects. Growth
capital investment was up $7.5 million
or 3%, with the majority of growth
capital investment funded by
customers causing the need for
investment, through $195.9 million
of capital contributions.
Smart maintenance
While overall capital expenditure
was down marginally, we continued
to invest in the maintenance of
the network and enhancing the
effectiveness of this maintenance
by optimising our investments and
leveraging technology.
This year we’ve leveraged technology
and strategic partnerships to replace
traditional ground-based field
inspections with aerial surveying
that captures much more detailed
and useful information than has
been possible before. Rather than
walking the lines, network inspectors
now conduct detailed assessments
from their desks by analysing high-
resolution images, Light Detection
and Ranging (LiDAR) and thermal
scans of network assets, captured
by drones and helicopters. This rich
asset information already means we’re
better able to validate asset condition
and improve our decision-making
on where to prioritise maintenance
investment. This has been enabled
through our strategic partnership with
X and, with the use of advanced AI,
has the potential to further increase
efficiency significantly (see break-out
box on page 23).
Delivering efficiently for our
customers
We’re keeping our focus on
delivering safe and reliable electricity
for customers as we see their
expectations for service rise, driven by
costs and changing behaviour such
as working from home. Requirements
around traffic management add
significant cost and time to our
projects, so we’re involved in trialling
a new, risk-based guideline for traffic
management, where site managers
will have more power to apply safety
measures that are reasonable for a
given situation. We’re hopeful the new
guidelines, due to come into force in
2026, will dramatically reduce costs for
our customers without compromising
safety. To avoid disruptions to our work
programmes, we’ve also kept our
attention on procurement processes
that mitigate what can be long times
for network equipment.
Vector Annual Report 202522
Electricity
Enabling network access
and reinforcing capacity
While the broader economic
slowdown has led to a softening
in the rate of new connection
growth, we’re seeing strong and
dynamic activity in the data centre
market, with changing connection
requirements driven by market
dynamics, and AI advancements.
We’re enabling growth in this market
by supporting customers’ planning
and development needs, and we’re
well-positioned to handle the
complexity and demand from the
sector by maintaining our proactive
investment in core network capacity.
We work closely with all customers
on their specific network connection
requests. In April we introduced
a new flexible commercial
connection option which provides
customers with an on-ramp towards
electrification by time-shifting
future capital improvements on
the network. This provides a better
understanding of the business case
and path towards electrification
for the customer, and a more
efficient use of the existing and
planned network.
Our position on who should pay for
the growth of the network remains
that those causing the growth
should pay for it. This underpins
our 100% recovery of connection
costs from connecting customers.
We believe this position is aligned
with the Electricity Authority’s
pricing principles, however the EA
is consulting on the methodology
for connection charges across
New Zealand, as we note on page 11.
Improving customer experience
through digital and data
This year, we’ve invested in building
our data and digital capability,
both in terms of bringing in specific
skills around AI, data science
and machine learning, as well as
deploying a modern data platform
to unlock advanced analytics and
further innovation.
This investment is already delivering
greater insights that improve our
ability to deliver better customer
experiences. One way it’s doing this is
through a new tool we’ve developed
that combines datasets from various
sources such as smart meters and
Optical Network Terminals, to help
us proactively identify individual
power outages following widespread
network damage caused by storms.
We’ve begun trialling this tool to help
us improve outcomes for customers.
Work has begun on the next stage
of a significant digital project to
introduce new capabilities into our
advanced distribution management
system. These new capabilities
comprise: an automated outage
management system, which will
predict the most likely fault location
and provide relevant information to
control room operators, and switch
order management, which reduces
reactive switching times through
the use of scenario analysis tools
and automatic safety checking. In
addition to improving core network
operations, these enhancements will
improve the information we provide
to our customers through our outage
centre, especially during storms, by
making it possible to supply updated
data much faster.
Network resilience
We’re investing in network
resilience against the impacts of
storms, such as Cyclone Tam which
occurred in April this year. Our
approach remains to do this smartly,
prioritising cost-effective actions,
such as infrastructure upgrading
to improve flood resilience at key
zone substations, and strengthening
electrical conductors. We’re acutely
aware of the need to strike the
right balance between investing
for resilience and ensuring the
cost burden for our customers
remains appropriate.
DRONES AND AI LEAD A REVOLUTION FROM POLES
TO PIXELS
We’re revolutionising how we maintain our electricity networks through
a strategic partnership with X, (Google’s innovation lab) and Tapestry, its
energy moonshot. By combining aerial technology with AI, Tapestry’s
GridAware platform is transforming traditional network inspections
from a manual ground-up process into an intelligent, automated system
that can spot wear and tear before it becomes a problem. This improves
network maintenance inspections so our customers can benefit from
more reliability, and sets a new standard for how we inspect and prioritise
maintenance on our network.
The aerial survey technology – from helicopters and drones – captures
precision images of our equipment, as well as other data like thermal
scans. With lots of high-quality data to hand, our network inspectors review
this back at their desks using GridAware and mark up images when they
spot something needs fixing. Two things happen next: we assess this rich
information to improve our decision-making on where to focus maintenance
investment, and we use it to train Tapestry’s AI to automatically conduct
condition assessments as more images are captured from elsewhere on
the network. It’s a powerful example of how technology, alongside Vector’s
experts, can solve real-world challenges, while making essential services
more resilient and efficient for the people of Auckland.
23
Electricity
Gas
distribution
Adjusted EBITDA
Gas distribution adjusted EBITDA is
up $1.9 million or 4% to $46.7 million,
as a result of pricing adjustments.
Operating expenses were relatively
flat overall compared to the previous
year. However, maintenance expenses
were higher, which is in line with
our strategy to optimise our asset
management approach in response
to our most recent demand forecasts
(see the break out box below).
Capital investment
Capital investment was down
$3.2 million or 14% to $19.0 million,
with $13.3 million of that expenditure
funded by customers through
capital contributions. The decrease
was driven by lower levels of
growth investment, reflected in
capital investment net of capital
contributions being 50% lower than
for the year before at $5.7 million.
This is in line with our strategy to
optimise our asset management
approach (see break-out box below).
Connections
There has been a 0.2% increase in
connections on our gas distribution
network over the year to 30 June
2025, bringing the total number of
connections to 120,621. However, new
gas connections were down 33% on
the previous year Total connections.
Volumes
Gas distribution volume was
down 8.5% at 11.9 PJ compared
to the previous years because of
lower demand from the residential,
industrial and commercial sectors.
Network and public safety
We’re proud that the past year has
again been one without any major
safety-related incident on our gas
network. We are committed to
delivering a safe, reliable and efficient
service and we focus not just on our
own asset management practices, but
also on engaging with the public and
customers to raise awareness of safe
working practices near our network.
Over recent years we’ve boosted our
proactive leak detection programme
using vehicle-mounted gas detection
equipment. This programme helps
us locate leaks faster, enabling us to
fix them quickly before impacts are
experienced by customers.
The programme has the added benefit
of reducing carbon emissions from
these leaks.
1. Our gas asset management plan is available on our website: vector.co.nz/about-us/regulatory.
SAFETY, RELIABILITY AND SERVICE IN AN ENVIRONMENT
OF DECLINING DEMAND
As we set out in our 2025 gas asset management plan (AMP)
1
, there is
unprecedented gas market uncertainty, scarcity of gas and rising costs. This
results in our connections forecast seeing customers disconnect at a faster rate
than new customers connect from FY2026, with new connections stopping in
FY2029.
Despite this, we remain dedicated to maintaining the reliability and security
of our gas distribution network, and our view remains that a long term solution
needs to be reached between government and network operators, as we
describe on page 10.
We’ve taken prudent steps to optimise our gas asset management strategies
to maintain network safety and reliability, while reducing asset stranding risk.
One of the ways we’re doing this is by reducing capital expenditure on asset
replacements (which is recovered over the life of the asset) and replacing this
with increased operational expenditure on maintenance (which is recovered
during a single financial year). Over time, this approach will see a reduction in
capital expenditure and a corresponding increase in operational expenditure.
We’re also calling for more to be done to provide certainty to help customers
and gas distribution businesses navigate the future.
Vector Annual Report 202524
Gas distribution
Over the past two years, VTS has
been live with Diverge, its next-
generation energy data platform.
As utilities around the world evolve
to meet the needs of the energy
transition, Diverge provides visibility
and insight at the edge of electricity
networks, where this visibility had
previously been limited.
Bluecurrent has served as
the primary deployment for
Diverge, where the platform has
demonstrated its capacity to scale
with the demands of the energy
sector. Since the introduction
of 5-minute electricity market
settlement rules in Australia, Diverge
has consistently processed six times
the volume of smart meter data
at ten times the speed of legacy
systems. Diverge has also been
delivering network operational data
to electricity distribution businesses
across New Zealand providing
insights that improve operations
and planning. In parallel, in the past
year Vector’s electricity business
has used Diverge to operationalise
data science, transforming analytical
models into practical tools that
inform important decisions and
strategic planning. This has included
managing electric bus charging
dynamically within available network
capacity, proactively detecting
network anomalies, such as incorrect
phase mapping, and understanding
electric vehicle charging using
advanced algorithms.
These commercial deployments
have validated Diverge’s underlying
architecture and have guided
ongoing product refinement.
VTS is now leveraging its success
with Bluecurrent and Vector to
bring Diverge to global utilities facing
similar challenges. VTS is partnering
with Slalom, a leading technology
consulting firm and a collaboration
with EDMI, a leading global smart
metering solutions provider. These
partnerships aim to accelerate
the roll-out of Diverge, combining
expertise in data, devices and
digital enablement.
Over the past 12 months, VTS has
demonstrated its capability to solve
problems on an international stage
and this has been received positively.
As a result, VTS has been invited
to participate in multiple formal
procurement processes, reflecting
growing demand for solutions that
can enable smarter, more responsive,
and data-driven networks.
The challenges faced by overseas
utilities are similar to those VTS has
already helped us solve locally, but
the scale is much larger. Through
the engagements VTS has had
this year, we’re seeing strong signs
it is well positioned to bridge the
gap between Vector’s internal
digital transformation and an
external product commercialisation
capability that has the potential to
help utilities globally.
Vector Technology
Solutions (VTS)
25
Vector Technology Solutions (VTS)
Governance report
This section of the annual report is an
overview of Vector’s corporate governance
framework, approved by the board, for the
financial year ended 30 June 2025.
Vector’s board is committed to maintaining high
standards of corporate governance, ensuring transparency
and fairness, and recognising the interests of our
shareholders and other stakeholders.
The board has an established set of guiding principles
that state that the company will:
–Be a leading commercial enterprise in New Zealand
with a reputation for delivering results through
sound strategy
–Have entrepreneurial agility, being the first to identify
opportunities and bring them to market
–Be a great employer which values knowledge and talent
–Strive to ensure that everyone who does work for
Vector goes home healthy and safe
–Deal fairly and honestly with its customers
–Be a good corporate citizen.
Vector’s governance practices are informed by the NZX
Listing Rules (NZX Rules), the NZX Corporate Governance
Code (31 January 2025) (NZX Code), the Financial Markets
Conduct Act 2013 and the Companies Act 1993. Vector’s
governance practices are consistent with the principles
in the NZX Code, except that Vector has not adopted a
formal protocol for responding to ‘control transactions’
takeovers (NZX Code Recommendation 3.6). Vector
has not adopted a formal protocol because Entrust
holds 75.1% of Vector’s shares; this means that:
–Any takeover offer would need to involve Entrust
–Any scheme of arrangement would require Entrust’s
approval.
Vector’s key corporate governance documents, including
board and committee charters and policies, can be found
at vector.co.nz/investors/governance.
Roles and responsibilities of the board
and management
The primary objective of the board is to protect and
enhance the value of Vector in the interests of Vector and
its shareholders.
The board has overall responsibility for all decision-making
within Vector. Vector’s governance practices are designed
to:
–Enable the board to provide strategic guidance for
Vector and effective oversight of management
–Clarify the roles and responsibilities of Vector’s
directors and senior executives to facilitate board
and management accountability to both Vector
and its shareholders
–Ensure a balance of authority so that no single
individual has unfettered powers.
To ensure that Vector’s business objectives and strategies
are achieved and to deliver value to the company and
its shareholders, the board strives to understand, meet
and appropriately balance the expectations of all its
stakeholders, including its employees, customers and the
wider community.
In carrying out its responsibilities and powers, the board
recognises its overriding responsibility to always act
honestly, fairly, diligently and in accordance with the law.
The board works to promote and maintain an environment
within Vector that establishes these principles as basic
guidelines for all its employees and representatives.
Vector achieves board and management accountability
principally through its board charter, which sets out
matters reserved for the board and responsibilities
delegated to the group chief executive, and a formal
delegation of authority framework. The effect of
this framework is that, while the board has statutory
responsibility for the activities of the company, this is
exercised through the delegation to the group chief
executive, who is accountable for the day-to-day
leadership and management of the company.
Vector Annual Report 202526
Governance report
The main functions of the board include:
–Reviewing and approving the strategic, business
and financial plans prepared by management
–Monitoring performance against the strategic,
business and financial plans
–Appointing, delegating to and reviewing the
performance of the group chief executive
–Approving major investments and divestments
–Ensuring ethical behaviour by the company, board,
management and employees
–Assessing its own effectiveness in carrying out its
functions.
The board charter sets out the expectation that all directors
continuously educate themselves to ensure that they may
perform their duties appropriately and effectively.
A committee or individual director may engage separate
independent professional advice in certain situations, at
the expense of the company, with the prior approval of the
chair of the board. The board also has access to executives
within the Vector group as a means of receiving expertise
and assurance information.
Each director has a duty to act in the best interests of the
company and the directors are aware of their collective
and individual responsibilities to stakeholders for the way
Vector’s affairs are managed, controlled and operated.
The board regularly assesses its effectiveness in carrying
out its functions and responsibilities. The board chair and
the committee chairs review and evaluate the board and
committees against their respective charters. The board
chair also engages with individual directors to evaluate
and discuss performance and professional development.
Externally facilitated reviews of the board’s performance,
including its committees, are carried out from time to
time. The board last participated in an externally facilitated
review in 2024.
The group chief executive is supported by the
Vector executive team. Details of the members of
the executive team are set out in the management
team section on pages 48 and 49 of this annual
report and in the About Us section of Vector’s website
(vector.co.nz/about-us/board-executive-team). Members of
the Vector executive team have regular access to the board.
Board membership
Vector’s board comprises experienced directors from
diverse backgrounds who govern the company on
behalf of its shareholders and other stakeholders. The
directors are committed to maintaining high standards
of corporate governance, ensuring transparency and
fairness and recognising the interests of stakeholders.
Vector’s constitution and the NZX Rules set certain
requirements in relation to the board structure. The board
must have a minimum of three and a maximum of nine
directors, with at least two being ordinarily resident in
New Zealand (as explained in section 3.1.6 of the NZX’s
Governance Guidance Note (January 2025)) and at least
two being ‘Independent Directors’ (as defined in the NZX
Rules). The board currently comprises seven directors,
all of whom are non-executive. Six of Vector’s directors
ordinarily reside in New Zealand and one director
ordinarily resides in Australia. Biographies are set out on
pages 46 and 47 of this report and include information on
the year of appointment, independence, skills, experience
and background of each director. The current directors
possess an appropriate mix of skills, expertise and diversity
to enable the board to discharge its responsibilities and
deliver the company’s strategic priorities, as illustrated
in the skills and experience matrix on page 28. The board
recognises that a regular refreshment programme leads
to the introduction of new perspectives, skills, attributes
and experience and the board also has regular regard for
succession planning for its roles. As required, the board
strengthens its oversight of issues in all disciplines by
seeking expert advice.
27
Governance report
Board skills and experience
STRATEGIC FOCUSDESCRIPTIONNUMBER OF DIRECTORS
LeadershipSenior leadership experience, board director
and executive
Leadership
Strategy Strategy and commercial acumen
Strategy
CustomerCustomers and community
Customer
EnergyEnergy industry experience
Energy
ESGSocial and environmental, climate change,
ESG, sustainability
ESG
PeoplePeople and culture, workforce, remuneration
and talent
People
GovernanceGovernance, risk and compliance
Governance
RegulatoryRegulatory and government policy
Regulatory
FinanceFinancial acumen
Finance
TechnologyTechnology, cyber security, AI, data
Technology
Digital innovationDigital evolution, transformation and
innovation
Digital innovation
EXPERT
ADVANCED
CAPABLE
LIMITED
Vector Annual Report 202528
Governance report
Director independence
The nominations committee has responsibility on
behalf of the board for making determinations as to the
independence status of all directors on an ongoing basis.
The committee’s assessment of independence is guided
by the NZX Rules and NZX Code Recommendation 2.4.
The board has reviewed the position and relationships
of all directors in office and considers that five of the
non-executive directors are independent directors for
the purposes of the NZX Rules and NZX Code. Those
directors are Doug McKay (who is Vector’s chair), Vaughan
Busby, Dame Paula Rebstock, Bruce Turner and Anne
Urlwin. Dr Paul Hutchison and Alastair Bell represent
Vector’s majority shareholder Entrust and are therefore
not independent directors because of that association.
Directors are required to inform the board of all relevant
information which may affect their independence.
Only independent, non-executive directors are eligible
to be the board chair. The roles of board chair, audit
committee chair, risk and assurance committee chair,
people and remuneration committee chair and group
chief executive are each held by different people.
Ownership of Vector securities by directors is not a
requirement. Directors’ ownership interests are listed
on pages 114 and 116 of this annual report.
Director period of appointment
0-3 YEARS3-9 YEARS9 YEARS +
Number of
directors250
Board committees
There are four standing board committees: an audit
committee, a nominations committee, a people and
remuneration committee and a risk and assurance
committee. Members of each committee may be
recommended by the nominations committee and are
appointed by the board. Each committee has a written
charter that is approved by the board and sets out its
mandate. The charters are reviewed regularly (usually
biennially), with any proposed changes recommended
to the board for approval. All charters are available on
Vector’s website. The board may also form additional ad
hoc committees as needed and committees relating to
the electricity and gas asset management plans met
during the reporting period. The company secretary
has unfettered access to the chairs of the board and
the committees.
The members and chairs of each committee as at 30 June 2025:
COMMITTEEMEMBERS
Audit committeeAnne Urlwin (chair)
Alastair Bell
Paula Rebstock
Nominations committeeDoug McKay (chair)
Paula Rebstock
Paul Hutchison
People and remuneration committee Paula Rebstock (chair)
Alastair Bell
Bruce Turner
Risk and assurance committee*Bruce Turner (chair)
Paul Hutchison
Anne Urlwin
* Vaughan Busby was appointed to this committee after the reporting period, on 22 August 2025.
In addition to the committee members, the other directors have standing invitations to attend committee meetings.
The group chief executive, management and other guests are regularly invited by the relevant chair to attend board and
committee meetings also. Employees of Vector can only attend audit committee meetings by invitation.
29
Governance report
Attendance at meetings
Attendance records of board and committee meetings are provided in the table below.
COMMITTEEFULL BOARD
AUDIT
COMMITTEE
RISK AND
ASSURANCE
COMMITTEE
PEOPLE AND
REMUNERATION
COMMITTEE
NOMINATIONS
COMMITTEEAGM
TOTAL MEETINGS1364341
A Bell 13632***1
V Busby**1
B Hassall*21
P Hutchison 124***41***41
D McKay (chair) 136***4
†
3***41
P Rebstock 135
‡
1***341
B Turner 135***432***1
A Urlwin 1363
‡
1
†
2***1
* Retired 26 September 2024.
** Appointed 13 June 2025.
*** Director attending the committee meeting who is not a member of the committee.
† Director retired as a committee member, 24 October 2024.
‡ Director was appointed a committee member, 24 October 2024.
Note that full board meetings include ten board meetings and three ‘deep dive’ meetings.
Audit committee
The purpose of the audit committee is to assist the
board in fulfilling its responsibilities for the quality and
integrity of Vector’s external financial and climate-related
reporting, the independence and performance of the
external auditors, and effectiveness of the internal control
system for financial and climate-related reporting and
accounting records.
The audit committee provides a formal forum for
communication between the board and the external
auditors, ensures the independence of the external
auditors, has oversight of audit planning, reviews and
recommends audit fees, considers audit opinions and
evaluates the performance of the external auditors.
Oversight of the company’s external audit arrangements
to safeguard the integrity of financial reporting is the
responsibility of the audit committee. Included within the
audit committee’s responsibilities set out in its charter
is the requirement to ensure that audit independence is
maintained, both in fact and appearance.
The NZX Rules, NZX Code and the audit committee’s
charter require that the audit committee must comprise at
least three members, all being non-executive directors of
Vector, at least one of whom should be both independent
and have an adequate accounting or financial background,
and the majority of whom must be independent
as determined by the board. The chair must be an
independent director and cannot be the chair of the board.
Two members of Vector’s audit committee have specialist
financial skills and experience.
Risk and assurance committee
The purpose of the risk and assurance committee is to
assist the board in fulfilling its responsibilities to ensure
Vector manages its risks and compliance appropriately,
including through overseeing Vector’s risk management
framework and policies. The risk and assurance
committee charter requires this committee to comprise
at least three members, being directors of Vector, at least
two of whom must be independent.
People and remuneration committee
Vector has a people and remuneration committee as
discussed in the remuneration report on page 37.
Nominations committee
The purpose of the nominations committee is to
assist the board in fulfilling its responsibility to have
an efficient mechanism for the director selection,
appointment and retention practices of the company
(including coordinating director appointments with
Entrust, consistent with Entrust’s rights under Vector’s
constitution) and for the appointment and succession of
the group chief executive. All new directors enter into a
written agreement with Vector, which sets out the terms
of their appointment.
The NZX Code and the nominations committee’s charter
require that the nominations committee must comprise
at least three members, being directors of Vector, the
majority of whom should be independent directors.
Vector Annual Report 202530
Governance report
External auditor
The role of the external auditor is to audit the financial
statements of the company in accordance with applicable
auditing standards in New Zealand and to report on its
findings to the board and shareholders of the company.
While a policy of periodic rotation of external audit firm is
not mandated at Vector, the effectiveness, performance
and independence of the external auditor is reviewed
at least annually by the audit committee. The board,
after considering the recommendations of the audit
committee, considers and reviews the appointment of
external auditors. The board requires the rotation of the
key audit partner for the statutory audit after no more
than five years. The company’s external auditor is KPMG,
who has been Vector’s auditor since FY2003. Matt Diprose
has been the audit partner since FY2025 and Laura
Youdan has been the assurance partner since 2018. All
services provided by KPMG are considered on a case-by-
case basis by the audit committee to ensure there is no
actual or perceived threat to independence in accordance
with the external auditor independence policy. The audit
partner and assurance partner have provided the audit
committee with written confirmation that, in their view,
they were able to operate independently during the
year. KPMG has provided the board with the required
independence declaration for the financial year ended
30 June 2025. The audit committee has determined that
there are no matters that have affected the auditor’s
independence. The external auditor’s independence
policy also contains guidelines for what services (other
than the statutory audit role) the external auditor can
provide. It is the board’s policy that all non-audit services
proposed to be undertaken by the external auditor must
be pre-approved by the audit committee. The audit
committee considered and gave its approval for the
auditor to undertake certain non-audit-related matters.
Fees paid to KPMG are included in Note 8 of the notes
to the financial statements contained on page 73 of this
annual report. KPMG was paid $1.5 million for services in
the financial year to 30 June 2025. Of this sum, $1.4 million
was for audit-related services and $0.1 million was for non-
audit-related services. Non-audit-related work did not
exceed 25% of the amount paid for audit work. The auditor
is regularly invited to meet with the audit committee
including without management present.
The auditor has been invited to attend the annual
shareholders’ meeting and will be available to answer
questions about the audit process and the independence
of the auditor.
Risk management
Vector recognises that rigorous risk management is
essential for corporate stability, high performance and
the success of its strategic objectives and vision. To drive
sustainable growth and ensure operational resilience,
it is important to anticipate risks to its business while
capitalising on opportunities as they arise.
Vector’s enterprise risk management (ERM) framework
provides a purpose-built and flexible approach to the
application of risk management across Vector and
is consistent with the international risk management
standard ISO31000. Vector’s risk management
processes and tools are embedded within its business
operations to drive consistent, effective and accountable
decision-making.
Consistent with the ‘three lines model’, all Vector people
are responsible for applying Vector’s ERM framework
within their individual roles to proactively identify, analyse,
evaluate and treat risks. This risk mindset is promoted
through:
–The group risk function partnering with business
units to continue to enhance risk management at
operational, executive team and board levels
–Embedding of risk assessments and discussions
within key decision-making processes
–Continuous development through both internal and
external reviews.
Vector continues to review and mature its ERM
framework to reflect the evolving context within
which we work. The company engages external advisors
to assist in incorporating the latest developments in
risk management and to reflect the current operating
environment.
The board is responsible for ensuring that key strategic,
operational and financial risks are identified, and that
appropriate controls and procedures are in place to
manage those risks effectively. The risk and assurance
committee has overall responsibility for ensuring that
the company’s risk management framework and
processes are fit for purpose and effective, such that risks
are appropriately identified, considered and managed
against Vector’s objectives and strategic vision. Spanning
across Vector’s portfolio of businesses, Vector’s group risk
function is tasked with the ongoing development and
implementation of the ERM framework and risk processes.
In addition to monitoring the changing business
landscape and macro-economic trends, this function
works with Vector business units to facilitate smart risk-
based decision-making as well as risk analysis and the
evaluation of risk against Vector’s risk appetite. These
perspectives inform the development of the group key risk
profile which provides both the board and executive team
with a consolidated view of:
1) The strategically focused risks which could have
a significant impact on the long-term value and
sustainability of Vector’s business
2) The operational and financial risks which are assessed
and managed as part of meeting key business
objectives and maintaining operational resilience.
Vector’s group material risks are shown on page 32. Risks
1, 4, 5 and 6 include Vector’s risks in relation to the impacts
of climate change. Refer to Vector’s climate-related
disclosures report for information on its-related risks
and opportunities.
31
Governance report
Vector group’s material risks
1
Failure of the electricity network to adapt and
transition to changing demand in a way that achieves
affordability and efficient capital spend
2
Adverse or unanticipated government responses to
energy market failure and/or increased prices
3
Cyber security compromise
4
Adverse or unanticipated change to government policy
affecting the electricity or gas business, or legislative/
regulatory settings related to the Commerce Act 1986
(Part IV), Electricity Act 1992, Gas Act 1992, or Electricity
Industry Act 2010
5
External shock event, including natural disaster, major
weather events, pandemic and other external impacts
6
Adverse impacts, government responses and
unrealised opportunities from climate change
7
The rapid change and opportunity created from
utilising data and AI
8
Breach of SAIDI and SAIFI
9
Inability to develop, retain and recruit specialised talent
10
Serious harm or fatality event resulting from non-
performance of internal processes
11
Major/repeated disruption of electricity, gas and fibre
critical services through non-performance of internal
processes
12
Adverse mental health impacts that arise from
workplace factors
13
Failure to collect, protect or create value from
information and intellectual property
14
Reputational damage/adverse impacts on stakeholder
and customer confidence
15
Failure, poor performance and/or availability of critical
third parties (including service providers, suppliers and
partnerships)
16
Funding, liquidity, cash flow and credit risk because of
uncertain economic conditions and market risks
direct link to
Gas transition
Inability to efficiently manage peak
electricity load to avoid network
congestion
Energy platforms
Increase in extreme weather events
Refer to Vector’s climate-related disclosures report
Distributed energy resources
Climate-related risks
Climate-related opportunities
Vector Annual Report 202532
Governance report
Health and safety
Vector is committed to conducting its business activities
in such a way as to protect the health and safety of all
workers of Vector and its related companies, the public
and visitors in its work environment. Vector is committed
to continual and progressive improvement in its health
and safety performance. Page 16 of this annual report
contains Vector’s approach to performance in these areas,
including its proactive lead indicators and traditional lag
indicators of the Lost Time Injury Frequency Rate (LTIFR)
and the Total Recordable Injury Frequency Rate (TRIFR).
The board has delegated day-to-day responsibility for
the implementation of health and safety standards and
practices to management.
The board is committed to providing effective resources
and systems at all levels of the organisation to fulfil its
commitment to employees, customers, shareholders
and stakeholders.
Vector’s commitments and requirements for health and
safety are set out in the health and safety policy.
Internal audit
Vector’s business performance and internal audit function
is overseen by the risk and assurance committee, and
the audit committee, providing independent and
objective assurance on the effectiveness of governance,
risk management and internal controls across business
operations. The business performance and internal audit
team has unrestricted access to Vector’s businesses and
staff. The team liaises closely with KPMG, as Vector’s
external auditor, to share the outcomes of the internal
audit programme.
Ethical and responsible behaviour
Directors and employees are expected to act legally,
ethically, responsibly and with integrity in a manner
consistent with Vector’s policies, procedures and values.
The code of conduct and ethics covers a wide range of
areas and provides guidance regarding personal integrity,
business integrity, customers and society, people, and
assets and information. It outlines the responsibilities of
Vector’s people and explains the standards of conduct
and ethics. The code of conduct and ethics is highlighted
to new staff being inducted at Vector and is promoted
regularly within the company. The code of conduct and
ethics is generally reviewed every two years.
The procedure for advising the company of a suspected
breach is set out in the whistleblower policy. People at
Vector have a range of options to speak up if they notice
something that is not right, including raising a concern
with a relevant manager. Reporting can be in person, by
phone, email, post and online form and all options can be
done anonymously.
A comprehensive set of policies has been put in place to
assist directors, staff and contractors to act and make
decisions in an ethical and responsible manner.
The board has implemented formal procedures to handle
trading in Vector’s securities by directors and employees
of Vector in the securities trading policy, with approval
from the company secretary (on behalf of the company)
being required before trading can occur. The fundamental
rule in the policy is that trading with insider information is
prohibited at all times. The requirements of the policy are
separate from, and in addition to, the legal prohibitions on
insider trading in New Zealand. The policy provides that
shares may not be traded at any time by any individual
holding “material information” (as defined in the NZX
Rules). A blackout period prohibiting trading is imposed
for all directors, senior officers and certain other people
between the day before the half year and full year balance
dates and the first trading day after the release to NZX of
the financial results for that period.
Diversity and inclusion
The board’s commitment to creating and maintaining
both a diverse workforce and an inclusive workplace
for all employees is reflected in its diversity and
inclusion policy. A copy is available on Vector’s website
at vector.co.nz/investors/governance. A diversity,
inclusion and wellbeing council, made up of senior
management representatives, provides governance over
the implementation of the policy. Vector has dedicated
resources to drive the diversity, inclusion and wellbeing
programme of work.
The board is satisfied with the initiatives being
implemented by the Vector group and its performance
with respect to the diversity and inclusion policy.
Vector is committed to equitable pay and this does not
start and finish with gender; it also includes age and
ethnicity in the scope of annual pay equity reviews.
Remuneration at Vector is based on performance and
within this framework Vector makes adjustments when
appropriate to ensure equity across like-for-like roles.
This has become part of business as usual at Vector and
the company regularly monitors and adjusts salaries
across all three categories (gender, age, ethnicity) if any
gaps are identified. Vector reports its gender pay gap in
the remuneration report on page 42. Its overall diversity
and inclusion programme is focused on creating an
inclusive culture that attracts and retains talented people
from all parts of our communities. Vector has a continued
focus on performance and merit-based recruitment
and promotion.
33
Governance report
Gender statistics
Vector’s gender statistics are as follows:
AS AT 30 JUNE 2025AS AT 30 JUNE 2024
POSITIONFEMALEMALE
GENDER
DIVERSE
NOT
DISCLOSEDFEMALEMALE
GENDER
DIVERSE
Directors2 (28.6%)5 (71.4%)––2 (28.6%)5 (71.4%)–
Executive team1 (14.3%)6 (85.7%)––1 (14.3%)6 (85.7%)–
Direct reports to the executive team8 (20.0%)32 (80.0%)––9 (22.5%)31 (77.5%)–
Across the Vector group283 (35.4%)513 (64.1)–4 (0.50%)318 (32.6%)658 (67.4%)–
Investor engagement
Vector recognises the rights of shareholders as the owners
of the company and encourages their ongoing active
interest in the company’s affairs by:
–Communicating with them effectively
–Ensuring they have full access to information about
the company, including through the Vector website
–Conducting shareholder meetings in locations and
at times convenient to the majority of shareholders,
where possible
–Providing shareholders with adequate opportunity
to ask questions about, and comment upon, relevant
matters, and to question directly the external auditors
at shareholder meetings.
Vector’s board is committed to maintaining open and
transparent communications with investors and other
stakeholders and it supports a programme for two-way
engagement with shareholders, debt investors, the
media and the broader investment community. Annual
and interim reports, NZX releases, quarterly reports
on operational performance, governance policies and
charters and a wide variety of corporate information are
posted on Vector’s website. Vector conducts market
briefings in conjunction with the release of the annual
and interim financial results. Recordings of the briefings
are available on the annual reports page of the Investor
section of Vector’s website. Every shareholder is entitled
to receive a hard copy of each annual and interim report.
The company has a shareholder meetings page in
the Investors section of its website where documents
relating to meetings are available. Vector’s constitution
includes provisions relating to Entrust, Vector’s majority
shareholder. In addition, Vector and Entrust are parties to
a deed recording essential operating requirements, which
includes certain policy, consultation, pricing reporting and
the energy solutions programme obligations. A copy of
this deed is available on Entrust’s website.
The board is committed to reporting Vector’s financial and
non-financial information in an objective, balanced and
clear manner. The board takes an active role in overseeing
financial and non-financial reporting. The annual report
is an important document for communicating financial
reporting and also reports on strategic progress and
operational performance. It contains the financial
statements that are prepared to comply with generally
accepted accounting practice. The board contributes to
and reviews the annual report. Vector is committed to
transparent reporting of non-financial objectives, such as
environmental, social and governance factors.
The 2024 annual meeting was held as a hybrid meeting.
All shareholders had the opportunity to attend, participate
and vote either in person or online. Shareholders may raise
relevant matters for discussion at the annual shareholders’
meeting either in person or by emailing the company with
a question to be asked. Shareholders can also contact
the company to ask questions, or express views, about
matters affecting Vector. A dedicated email address
is available for shareholder/investor queries, which is:
investor@vector.co.nz. Contact details for Vector’s head
office are available on the website and at page 118 of this
annual report. Vector is committed to complying with
its obligations under the NZX Rules and the Companies
Act 1993, both of which contain specific requirements to
obtain shareholder approval for certain significant matters
affecting Vector. Where voting on a matter is required,
the board encourages investors to attend the meeting
or to send in a proxy vote. Notices of meeting are usually
available at least 20 working days prior to the meeting
on the shareholder meetings page in the Investors section
of Vector’s website. For the 2024 annual meeting, the
notice of meeting was made available and published on
the Vector website at least 20 working days before the
meeting.
Vector Annual Report 202534
Governance report
Continuous disclosure
The board is committed to:
–The provision of accurate, timely, orderly, consistent
and credible disclosure
–Compliance with the continuous disclosure
requirements of the Financial Markets Conduct Act
2013 and the NZX Rules.
The board supports the principle that high standards
of reporting and disclosure are essential for proper
accountability between the company and its investors,
employees and stakeholders. Vector achieves these
commitments, and the promotion of investor confidence,
by ensuring that trading in its securities takes place in
an efficient, competitive and informed market. Vector’s
continuous disclosure policy sets out protocols to facilitate
effective and compliant disclosure. Vector has also
established a management disclosure committee which
meets regularly to discuss continuous disclosure matters.
35
Governance report
Remuneration report
Dear Shareholders
As chair of Vector’s people and remuneration
committee, I am pleased to present our remuneration
report for the year ended 30 June 2025.
We continue to believe that Vector’s remuneration
framework supports the attraction, retention
and motivation of high-performing talent, while
aligning executive outcomes with company
strategy and shareholder and customer interests.
We have revised and introduced new internal
role bands with corresponding salary ranges.
All employees have visibility to their band level,
and we have continued to communicate our
banding methodology and embed these across
the company; otherwise, we have not made any
major changes over the past year.
A detailed overview of employee remuneration
is set out in the Remuneration approach section.
We have adopted NZX’s December 2023
remuneration reporting template recommendations
to further enhance the transparency and quality of
our remuneration disclosures. For 2025, we have
considered how we might continue to improve our
reporting and provided the additional information
in a number of areas:
–Details on the corporate short-term incentive
(STI) construct as part of the group chief
executive disclosure
–Details on the group chief executive’s
remuneration for FY2025
–Information on Vector’s gender pay gap and
gender pay equity.
Beyond remuneration, we introduced a
company-wide employee engagement survey in
October 2024. While we were pleased with the
overall results, we have used the commentary
and feedback to determine focus areas along
with comprehensive action plans, noting our
commitment to continuous improvement. We have
also focused on our talent pipeline, both internally
and externally. We have been building on our
strategic workforce planning to understand skills
and capabilities required in our critical operational
areas and align recruitment and development
programmes. In addition, we have focused on
critical roles and ensuring these positions have
comprehensive succession plans. Externally, we
are proactively building our talent pipeline and
developing strategic talent-based collaborations.
In the year ahead and beyond, Vector will consider
the extent to which we need to develop and build
upon our remuneration framework to meet new
work challenges, changing market and talent
environments, and diverging business needs.
We will continue our work to further simplify our
STI schemes – both in terms of the number of
constructs and number of key goals.
Dame Paula Rebstock
Chair, People and Remuneration Committee
22 August 2025
People and remuneration
committee chair letter
Vector Annual Report 202536
Remuneration report
Remuneration governance
The people and remuneration committee assists the
board in overseeing the performance and remuneration
of the group chief executive and executive team. It also
provides oversight of Vector’s broader people strategy,
culture and related policies.
The committee operates under a written charter, which is
available at vector.co.nz/investors/governance.
The majority of members are independent directors.
Other directors have a standing invitation to attend
committee meetings and management attends
committee meetings by invitation.
Attendance at committee meetings during the FY2025
period is shown on page 30.
NAMEDATE JOINED THE COMMITTEE
LENGTH OF MEMBERSHIP
TO 30 JUNE 2025DATE LEFT THE COMMITTEE
Paula Rebstock (chair)2 Dec 20195 years, 7 monthsN/A, current member
Alastair Bell2 Dec 20195 years, 7 monthsN/A, current member
Bruce Turner 1 Nov 20231 year, 8 monthsN/A, current member
Anne Urlwin* 1 Nov 20231 year24 Oct 2024
*
Anne Urlwin remains a director on the Vector board.
Key: Current committee member Committee member in the FY2025 period
External and independent advice
During the year, Vector engaged Pricewaterhouse
Coopers New Zealand (PwC NZ) to provide independent
advice on potential incentive scheme designs and their
implications. PwC also conducted market benchmarking
for directors, the group chief executive and executive
team remuneration. PwC did not provide any other
material services that would impact their independence
in relation to this advice.
Remuneration approach
Our remuneration framework is designed to attract
and retain high-performing individuals, support the
delivery of the company’s strategy and reward employees
appropriately. The framework is designed around four
guiding principles:
–Ensure Vector is competitively positioned in the New
Zealand employment market
–Reward high performance through pay, based on
results achieved and demonstrated behaviours and
competencies
–Reward achievement of strategic objectives and
increasing shareholder returns
–Ensure fairness and equity is applied across
remuneration decisions.
Our remuneration policy sets out our approach to
remuneration for all employees (including the group chief
executive and his direct reports). The remuneration policy
is available to view at vector.co.nz/investors/governance.
There were no material changes to Vector’s remuneration
strategy or policy in FY2025, except to combine our
employee and executive remuneration policies into one.
The group chief executive and executive team’s
remuneration consists of a base salary, standard
employee benefits and a short-term incentive (STI).
No long-term incentive (LTI) is currently offered.
Fixed remuneration
Fixed remuneration (not at risk) consists of base salary
and other benefits including KiwiSaver. Base salary is
reviewed each year in line with data from independent
remuneration specialists. Employees’ base salary is
based on a matrix of their own performance including
behaviours and their current position in their internal
remuneration band when compared to the market.
37
Remuneration report
Short-term incentives (STI)
Senior employees were invited to participate in the
FY2025 STI scheme. The FY2025 STI is an at-risk cash
incentive, calculated as a percentage of base salary
(target percentages ranging from 20% to 65%) depending
on the complexity and level of the role.
The purpose of the STI scheme is to reward behaviour
and outcomes that are considered important for Vector’s
shareholders and customers, and is measured against five
overarching goals: financial, customer, health and safety,
people, and climate change. Company performance goals
are set and reviewed annually by the board to align with
business and financial objectives. Targets and measures
may vary by business area; however, these are aligned
where appropriate.
In the FY2025 period, Vector had four distinct business
area STI constructs covering:
–Corporate
–Electricity and Gas
–HRV
–VTS.
The STI scheme is subject to financial (adjusted EBITDA)
and health and safety (no fatalities because of Vector’s
policies or processes) gates, as well as an individual
performance gate. All must be met before any payment
occurs. STI payments are determined following a review
of company performance and paid out at between 0%
and 113% for all eligible employees. As an example of how
the STI is calculated, an employee with a base salary of
$200,000 and an STI target of 20% may receive between
$0 and $45,200 (0% to 113% of their STI) depending, at
the board’s discretion, on the level of business unit and
company performance assuming the gates are met.
STI payments relating to the financial year ended 30 June
2025 are delivered as a taxable cash payment and are
payable on completion of the annual audited financial
statements. Payments relating to the 2025 financial year
are therefore paid in the 2026 financial year. The outcomes
of three of the four STI constructs are outlined below.
No payment calculations were undertaken for HRV, as
the financial gate was not achieved.
Corporate: FY2025 STI goals and results
GOALS
CORPORATE
METRIC% PAY-OUT
Financial Adjusted EBITDA (group)40.7%
CustomerCustomer satisfaction target32.5%
Health and safetyAggregate of three lag indicators (LTIFR*, TRIFR** and Severity Rate)7.5%
PeopleeNPS (shared services)0%
Climate changeDecarbonisation milestone targets10.5%
Total91.2%
* Lost Time Injury Frequency Rate
** Total Recordable Injury Frequency Rate
Electricity and Gas: FY2025 STI goals and results
GOALS
ELECTRICITY AND GAS
METRIC% PAY-OUT
Financial Adjusted EBITDA (business unit)40.9%
CustomerCustomer satisfaction target
Unplanned gas, SAIDI and SAIFI targets
32.5%
Health and safetyAggregate of three lag indicators (LTIFR*, TRIFR** and Severity Rate)7.5%
PeopleeNPS (business unit)0%
Climate changeDecarbonisation milestone targets10.5%
Total91.4%
* Lost Time Injury Frequency Rate
** Total Recordable Injury Frequency Rate
Vector Annual Report 202538
Remuneration report
VTS: FY2025 STI goals and results
GOALS
VTS
METRIC% PAY-OUT
Financial Key projects and cost management targets*
CustomerCustomer and service level agreement targets*
PeopleeNPS (business unit)*
Total*
The group chief executive and four executives are
measured on the corporate goals: the chief financial
officer, the chief legal and assurance officer, the chief
public policy and regulatory officer, and the chief
people and communications officer. The chief operating
officer (COO) of electricity, gas and fibre is measured in
accordance with the electricity and gas business area
goals and the COO of Vector Technology Solutions (VTS) in
accordance with the VTS business area goals. There is no
executive measured against the HRV business area goals.
Other remuneration
Vector has not provided a joining bonus to executives
in the last financial year. Vector does not provide
‘termination payments’ to outgoing executives, nor does it
provide retirement payments (if any at all) at greater rates
for executives than other staff members (if applicable).
* Pending board determination
39
Remuneration report
FIXED REMUNERATIONAT-RISK REMUNERATIONTOTAL REMUNERATION
EARNED IN RELATIONSALARY BENEFITS
SUBTOTALSTI
FY2025$1,609,137$0 $1,609,137$1,163,084$2,772,221
FY2024$1,554,722$0 $1,554,722$1,187,419$2,742,141
A description of the group chief executive’s at-risk remuneration for the performance period ending 30 June 2025
is set out below.
SCHEMEDESCRIPTIONPERFORMANCE MEASURES
PERCENTAGE OF
TARGET AWARDED
STICash STI is a
discretionary scheme
based on
achievement of KPIs
Corporate shared KPIs:
–40% adjusted EBITDA
–30% customer satisfaction
–10% health and safety lag indicators
–10% eNPS
–10% carbon reduction and resilience goals
59.28%
The group chief executive’s individual KPIs for the year
ending 30 June 2025 included key strategic initiatives
relating to Bluecurrent and succession planning.
13%
FY2026 group chief executive STI structure
The board has elected, in the interests of transparency, to disclose in advance the STI structure that applies for FY2026.
Given the current group chief executive is leaving at the end of December 2025, there are no individual KPIs for the year
ending 30 June 2026. In addition, the board retains its discretion to amend this STI structure in connection with the
appointment of a new group chief executive.
SCHEMEDESCRIPTIONPERFORMANCE MEASURES
STICash STI is a
discretionary scheme
based on
achievement of KPIs
Corporate shared KPIs:
–30% adjusted EBITDA
–40% customer satisfaction, SAIDI and SAIFI targets
–15% health and safety lag and lead indicators
–15% employee engagement targets
This year, we have met our 2030 emissions reduction target. As a result, no specific climate change measure has been
included in the FY2026 STI scheme. With the target achieved, our focus is now on maintaining these reductions while
advancing our broader Symphony objectives to support the energy transition. Management will also review Vector’s
climate resilience initiatives and broader climate-related activities to ensure continued alignment with evolving best
practices and stakeholder expectations.
specialists using relevant market peer benchmarks,
as is the case with the executive team and certain senior
leadership roles.
Group chief executive remuneration outcomes
The table below shows the amounts assessed as earned
in relation to a financial year but not paid in that same
financial year (as the assessment of the STI performance
is made after the balance date). For instance, the STI
earned for FY2024 was paid in FY2025 (September 2024).
The STI earned in relation to FY2025 is expected to be
paid in FY2026 (September 2025).
Group chief executive remuneration arrangements
Vector’s group chief executive is covered by
the remuneration policy that is available at
vector.co.nz/investors/governance.
The group chief executive’s total remuneration includes
fixed remuneration, and an annual at-risk STI. The STI is
based on the achievement of corporate key performance
indicators (KPIs) and individual performance objectives,
with a maximum opportunity of 78% of base salary. No
long-term incentive (LTI) plan was in place for the group
chief executive during FY2025.
The group chief executive’s base salary is reviewed
periodically by the board and by external remuneration
1. Benefits include KiwiSaver, life and income protection insurance, carpark provision, and home phone rental, tolls and internet expenses.
Vector Annual Report 202540
Remuneration report
REMUNERATION BANDGROUPCOMPANY
$100,001 - $110,000
6550
$110,001 - $120,0004535
$120,001 - $130,0004635
$130,001 - $140,0004233
$140,001 - $150,0004943
$150,001 - $160,0004134
$160,001 - $170,0003732
$170,001 - $180,0004841
$180,001 - $190,0002621
$190,001 - $200,0003226
$200,001 - $210,0001612
$210,001 - $220,0001010
$220,001 - $230,0001515
$230,001 - $240,00076
$240,001 - $250,0001514
$250,001 - $260,00055
$260,001 - $270,00011
$270,001 - $280,00032
$280,001 - $290,00033
$290,001 - $300,00044
$300,001 - $310,00011
$310,001 - $320,0001–
$320,001 - $330,00022
REMUNERATION BANDGROUPCOMPANY
$330,001 - $340,00011
$340,001 - $350,00044
$350,001 - $360,00044
$360,001 - $370,00044
$370,001 - $380,00011
$380,001 - $390,00011
$400,001 - $410,00011
$430,001 - $440,00011
$450,001 - $460,00022
$460,001 - $470,00011
$470,001 - $480,00022
$530,001 - $540,0001–
$570,001 - $580,0001–
$600,001 - $610,00011
$680,001 - $690,00011
$690,001 - $700,00011
$740,001 - $750,00011
$860,001 - $870,00011
$870,001 - $880,00011
$980,001 - $990,00011
$1,170,001 - $1,180,00011
$2,790,001 - $2,800,00011
547456
Group employees who earn over $100,000
The table below shows the number of employees and
former employees who received remuneration and other
benefits during FY2025 of at least $100,000 for the year
ended 30 June 2025. This includes 129 employees who are
no longer employed as a result of business divestments
and employee turnover.
The value of remuneration benefits analysed includes:
–Fixed remuneration including allowance/overtime
payments
–Employer KiwiSaver/superannuation contributions
–Short-term cash incentives relating to FY2024
–Relocation and other payments made at the start
of employment
–Redundancy and other payments made on
termination of employment.
The figures do not include amounts paid after 30 June
2025 that relate to the year ended 30 June 2025.
Table of employees who earn over $100,000
No employee of the group appointed as a director
of a subsidiary or associate company receives or
retains any remuneration or benefits as a director. The
remuneration and benefits of such employees, received
as employees, are included in the relevant bandings
disclosed above.
41
Remuneration report
Gender pay reporting
We are committed to fair and equitable pay practices,
and to building a workforce that reflects and includes
the diverse communities we serve across Aotearoa
New Zealand.
Understanding pay reporting
Pay reporting is broadly defined as:
Gender pay gap – identifies any difference in the
median (or average) hourly wages of men and women.
This is calculated using the following formula: (male
hourly rate – female hourly rate)/(male hourly rate)
Gender pay equity – equal pay for equal work – identifies
any difference in the median (or average) pay men and
women receive for the same or similar roles. This is
calculated using the following formula: (male PIR – female
PIR)/(male PIR), where PIR is base salary divided by the
midpoint of the relevant internal salary range.
Vector’s pay reporting
We recognise and respect that gender is not binary.
For this reporting, we have calculated our gender pay
equity and pay gap only as the difference between those
that identify as women and men.
As at May 2025, the median gender pay gap is 15.86%,
meaning woman earn $0.84 for every dollar earned
CAREER LEVEL
WORKFORCE DEMOGRAPHICGENDER PAY REPORTING
FEMALE POPULATIONMALE POPULATIONMEDIAN PAY GAPMEDIAN PAY EQUITY
Management/executive 24.80%75.20%7.60%-0.40%
Specialist33.71%66.29%3.56%2.38%
Support 68.04%31.96%5.10%-1.32%
by men. At Vector, the context behind our gender
pay gap figure is that more senior technical roles and
managerial roles are currently held by men, which is
common across the energy and utilities sectors. In
addition, higher salaries are sometimes commanded
for a specific skillset or talent shortages in some areas,
many of which are male-dominated. The increase in the
median pay gap since 2024 is primarily due to the sale
of Ongas, which had a predominately male workforce
in lower-paid roles.
Our median gender pay equity gap as at May 2025 is
1.04%. We assess all roles at Vector based on the skills
and competencies required for the role and then use
market data to apply an appropriate remuneration range
for each position. Roles are grouped into salary bands,
which cluster similar-sized roles together. The slight
increase in our median pay equity gap is also primarily
due to the sale of Ongas.
Each year, as part of our annual remuneration review,
we analyse all our data to ensure that we are maintaining
our commitment to gender pay equity, and make
adjustments if required. The table below details Vector’s
workforce demographic and gender pay gap and pay
equity as at May 2025.
Vector Annual Report 202542
Remuneration report
Directors’ remuneration
When determining the fees for non-executive directors,
the board considers the market, Vector’s remuneration
practices compared to similar companies, the
competitiveness of the prevailing levels of remuneration
and our ability to meet the primary remuneration
policy objective of attracting and retaining high-quality
directors, and any changes in directors’ workloads.
A copy of Vector’s director remuneration policy is available
at vector.co.nz/investors/governance.
Director remuneration is reviewed by the board from time
to time and normally biennially.
Fee structure
The total non-executive director remuneration pool
available to directors (in their capacity as such) in the
year ended 30 June 2025 was fixed at our 2022 annual
shareholders’ meeting at $1,087,020.
The current fees by role are summarised in the following
table. The board allocates the total annual fee pool on
a consistent basis among the directors via a base fee
plus specified fees for each of the committee chair and
member roles held (excluding the board chair). Directors
are entitled to be reimbursed for reasonable incidental
costs associated with carrying out their duties and
professional development costs may also be paid by
Vector on a case-by-case basis. Non-executive directors
do not participate in any incentive or performance-based
remuneration schemes.
The board reserves the discretion to reallocate the total
annual fee pool, by resolution of the board, should the
board need to reconstitute the number of committees or
number of members on each committee.
GOVERNANCE BODYCHAIR PER ANNUMMEMBER PER ANNUM
Board$214,000*$107,000
Audit committee$27,000$15,000
Risk and assurance committee$27,000$15,000
People and remuneration committee$20,000$10,000
Pool for additional attendances$17,020
* The board chair is not paid additional fees as chair or member of the audit committee, risk and assurance committee or people and remuneration committee.
Actual payments
Fees payable to Vector’s directors for the 2025 financial year were as follows:
DIRECTORSFEE ($)
Doug McKay$214,000.00
Alastair Bell$132,000.00
Vaughan Busby*$0
Bruce Hassell**
$34,250.00
Paul Hutchison$122,000.00
Paula Rebstock$137,000.00
Bruce Turner$144,000.00
Anne Urlwin***
$147,333.33
* Appointed on 13 June 2025; no fees have been paid in the 2025 financial year.
** Resigned on 26 September 2024.
*** Stepped down from the people and remuneration committee on 24 October 2024.
Fee structure from 1 July 2025
At the date of this annual report, a market review of director fees has been carried out by PwC NZ for the board and
an increase to the fee pool (last increased in 2022) will be sought at the forthcoming annual shareholders’ meeting
in September.
43
Remuneration report
Who
we are
Who we are
44
Vector Annual Report 2025
Who we are
Who we are
45
Who we are
Our board
Dr Paul Hutchison
MB, ChB, FRCOG, FACOG, Dip Com Health, Member of Institute of Directors
NON-INDEPENDENT NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
―
Appointed on 8 December 2021
Dr Paul Hutchison was elected to the AECT (now Entrust) in 2015. He is a clinician at Local
Doctors (formerly East Tamaki Healthcare), a former member of the New Zealand Medical
Council as well as director of a number of companies and a member of the Institute of
Directors. Paul was the MP for Port Waikato, then Hūnua from 1999 to 2014. He chaired the
Health Select Committee from 2008 to 2014 and was awarded the NZ Medical Association’s
award for outstanding contribution to health services in 2014. Paul was appointed as
Honorary Consul Papua New Guinea in 2022. His other interests include science and
innovation, sport, music and fishing and he enjoys spending time with his family.
Alastair Bell
BCom, CA, CMInstD, PMP, JP
NON-INDEPENDENT NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
―
Appointed on 23 September 2019
Alastair Bell is a chartered accountant, chartered director and qualified member of the
Project Management Institute. He has more than 30 years’ experience in the corporate,
public and not-for-profit sectors. Alastair balances his professional life between board
roles and leading a consultancy specialising in business and investment projects. He is an
elected Trustee of Entrust, chairing the Entrust board’s Regulation and Policy Committee.
Alastair chairs the Ōrākei Community Association. Formerly, he was deputy chair of
Foundation North and a trustee of the Motutapu Restoration Trust.
Vaughan Busby
MBA, BPharm
INDEPENDENT NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
―
Appointed on 13 June 2025
Vaughan Busby is an experienced energy and infrastructure leader, bringing over 20
years of expertise to the board. He currently serves as a non-executive director for Energy
Queensland (the largest electricity distribution business in Australia) and Netlogix Australia
and is the chair of Australian entity SFV (an energy infrastructure financing company).
Previously, Vaughan was the chair of ASX-listed SciDev and has held directorships at
EnergyCo NSW, ASX-listed Energy One, Ergon Energy, Morrison and Infratil Energy
Australia.
Doug McKay
ONZM, BA, AMP (Harvard) CFInstD
INDEPENDENT NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR AND CHAIR
―
Appointed on 29 September 2022
Doug McKay has over 35 years’ commercial and operational experience and a deep
understanding of New Zealand and Australian markets having held managing director and
chief executive positions with Lion Nathan, Carter Holt Harvey, Goodman Fielder, Sealord,
Independent Liquor and Procter & Gamble. He was the inaugural chief executive of the
amalgamated Auckland Council from May 2010 to December 2013 and a former director of
Bank of New Zealand (chair), Trustee (chair) of the Eden Park Trust Board, Fletcher Building
Limited, Genesis Energy Limited, National Australia Bank Limited and Ryman Healthcare
Limited. In 2015, Doug was made an Officer of the New Zealand Order of Merit for services
to business and local government. He currently holds directorships with Delegat Group
and IAG New Zealand.
Vector Annual Report 202546
Our board
Bruce Turner
BE (Hons), ME, BCom
INDEPENDENT NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
―
Appointed on 16 April 2019
Bruce Turner is a highly experienced senior executive with deep experience across the dairy
and energy sectors, both in New Zealand and internationally. Working in the energy industry
for more than 30 years, he was extensively involved in the development of the energy
industries in New Zealand, Singapore and Europe. Bruce was a member of the New Zealand
Electricity Market (NZEM) despatch rules working group, the NZEM Rules Committee, the
MARIA governance board and the Electricity Authority’s Security and Reliability Council. This
deep understanding of the sector is invaluable as Vector, and the energy industry, navigates
the challenges of climate change and increasing demand for clean electricity supply. As
well as the Vector board, his governance experience includes joint venture boards for both
Mercury and Fonterra. Bruce is a director of GlobalDairyTrade Holdings Limited and an
advisory board member at the University of Colorado’s JP Morgan Center for Commodities.
Anne Urlwin
BCom, FCA, CFInstD, MAICD, ACIS, FNZIM, ONZM
INDEPENDENT NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
―
Appointed on 1 September 2021
Anne Urlwin is a professional director with experience in a diverse range of sectors
including construction, property development, health, infrastructure, telecommunications,
renewable energy, regulation and financial services. Her current governance roles
include chair of Precinct Properties New Zealand, and directorships of Infratil, Ventia
Services Group and City Rail Link. Anne is a former director of Summerset Group Holding,
Queenstown Airport Corporation, Tilt Renewables, Chorus, and Meridian Energy, and
a former chair of national commercial construction group Naylor Love Enterprises and
the New Zealand Blood Service. She is a chartered accountant with experience in senior
finance management roles. Anne was made an Officer of the New Zealand Order of Merit
in 2022 for services to business.
Dame Paula Rebstock
BSc (Econ), Dip & MSc (Econ)
INDEPENDENT NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
―
Appointed on 16 April 2019
Dame Paula Rebstock is a leading Auckland-based economist and company director,
who was made a Dame Companion of the New Zealand Order of Merit in 2015. She is chair
of NZ Healthcare Investments (Awanui), National Hauora Coalition, and Deputy Chair of
AIA and the NZX, and a director of Bluecurrent Group, SeaLink Group and Auckland One
Rail, and she retired her directorship (chair) of Ngāti Whātua Ōrākei Whai Maia in July 2025.
Dame Paula is the former chair of the New Zealand Commerce Commission.
47
Our board
Our management team
Shailesh Manga
BTech, Optoelectronics (Hons)
CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER OF VECTOR TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS (VTS)
―
Shailesh Manga is responsible for leading the growth of the VTS business. Specifically,
he is charged with building relationships with key global partners to co-develop digital
platforms critical to a new energy future. Shailesh has a strong focus on local and global
customer opportunities to increase revenue and deliver key aspects of our business
strategy. His experience is unique and vast, having worked both locally and globally in
the fields of physics, telecommunications, user experience and innovation. In his last role,
Shailesh delivered innovative experiences for some of the world’s largest brands including
Google, Microsoft, Samsung, and LG.
Jason Hollingworth
MCom (Hons), FCA, CMInstD
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
―
Jason Hollingworth joined Vector as chief financial officer in May 2019. He has over 30 years’
experience in a range of senior corporate finance roles including being CFO of public
listed pay television company Sky TV, CFO of telecommunications company TelstraClear,
investment manager for the diversified investment company Ngāi Tahu Holdings,
executive director at Asian private power development company AsiaPower and a director
of corporate advisory firm Southpac Corporation. Jason has a Master of Commerce degree,
is a Fellow of the Institute of Chartered Accountants ANZ and a member of the Institute
of Directors.
Simon Mackenzie
Grad DipBS (Dist), DipFin, NZCE
GROUP CHIEF EXECUTIVE
―
Simon Mackenzie is passionate about the power of technology to transform the energy
industry and consumers’ lives. As group chief executive, he has expanded and driven
Vector’s portfolio of businesses to embrace innovative technologies and strategies to
deliver efficient, sustainable energy solutions to consumers. Simon was appointed Vector’s
group chief executive in 2008. His tertiary qualifications include engineering, finance and
business studies, and the Advanced Management Programme at the Wharton School,
University of Pennsylvania.
John Rodger
LLB, BA
CHIEF LEGAL AND ASSURANCE OFFICER AND COMPANY SECRETARY
―
John Rodger is Vector’s chief legal and assurance officer and company secretary.
He is responsible for Vector’s legal, corporate governance, health and safety, business
performance, internal audit, risk, compliance, privacy, government relations, and
property functions. John joined Vector in 2006 and has extensive experience of
Vector’s businesses and operations. He has worked across a range of sectors including
energy, telecommunications and financial services and previously held legal roles in
major corporates and professional services firms in London, the Cayman Islands and
New Zealand.
Vector Annual Report 202548
Our management team
Mark Toner
LLB (Hons), BCom
CHIEF PUBLIC POLICY AND REGULATORY OFFICER
―
With over 25 years’ experience across a range of sectors including energy,
telecommunications, aviation and technology, Mark Toner has consistently navigated
market, regulatory and policy changes across industries in disruption. Responsible for
leading the group’s regulatory, public policy, decarbonisation and data insights and
analytics functions, he combines strong stakeholder engagement and reputation
management expertise with his commercial and legal background to drive Vector’s
vision of creating a new energy future. Mark is a past recipient of the New Zealand Prime
Minister’s Business Scholarship and in 2018 completed an Advanced Management
Programme at MIT in Boston.
Peter Ryan
BE
CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER ELECTRICITY, GAS AND FIBRE
―
Peter Ryan leads the strategic and digital operations of Vector’s electricity, gas, and fibre
network businesses, with a clear focus on delivering exceptional outcomes for customers.
With two decades of international experience in the telecommunications and energy
sectors, he has successfully led engineering, field, and customer operations teams to
enhance service delivery and network reliability. Peter’s leadership has consistently
prioritised customer needs – ensuring the deployment, maintenance, and performance of
critical infrastructure aligns with evolving expectations.
Before joining Vector, he served as Chief Network Officer at NBNCo Australia, where he
played a pivotal role in the successful roll-out and operation of the national broadband
network, significantly improving broadband access for millions of Australians. He brings
deep expertise in operations management and performance transformation, along with
a proven ability to integrate technical, operational and commercial strategies to drive
customer-centric innovation and business success.
Sarah Williams
BA, Cert. Journalism
CHIEF PEOPLE AND COMMUNICATIONS OFFICER
―
Sarah Williams leads Vector Group’s people, marketing and communications business
units. Along with her teams, she is responsible for planning and delivering strategies
across these three disciplines. Sarah is a senior leader with 30 years’ experience, and has
had a range of leadership roles at an executive and board level spanning public relations
and human resources remits. She joined Vector from Porter Novelli, a public relations
and marketing agency, where she held the position of Managing Director. Her experience
encompasses crisis management, reputation and stakeholder engagement, workforce
planning, wellbeing and people development. In 2019, Sarah was inducted into the College
of Fellows of the Public Relations Institute of New Zealand in recognition of her significant
contribution to the industry and high levels of competence.
49
Our management team
Entrust, majority
shareholder of Vector
More than 300 undergrounding projects have been
completed since the programme began, in central,
east and south Auckland.
Energy consumer trust Entrust was formed over 30 years ago to ensure that
stewardship across Auckland’s electricity network remains in the hands of Aucklanders.
Entrust acts in the interests of its 368,000 (as at 2025 roll date) families and businesses
in central, east and south Auckland. Entrust protects the $2.8 billion investment in
Vector through its role in the appointment of directors to Vector’s board and requiring
regular audit of the state of the network.
Here for the community
Entrust is proud of the work it has undertaken for its
beneficiaries and all Aucklanders.
Passing on a share of Vector’s profits to
beneficiaries
Vector’s growth and operating performance enables
Entrust to distribute an annual dividend to beneficiaries
through its 75.1% stake in Vector.
Advocacy on behalf of energy consumers
Entrust regularly advocates on behalf of energy
consumers on important matters. Submissions are
available on Entrust’s website, entrustnz.co.nz.
Enabling projects with direct benefit
Entrust has an agreement with Vector that requires
an average of $12.5 million to be invested in projects in
the Entrust district of central, east and south Auckland
every year.
In the year to 30 June 2025, key undergrounding projects
have been undertaken in St Heliers, Beachlands, Newell
Street (Pt Chevalier) and Hauraki Road (Waiheke),
with further resident-initiated projects undertaken in
Lawrence Street (Herne Bay), Campbell Road (Maraetai)
and Melford Street (St Mary’s Bay).
In September 2024, each of Entrust’s 365,000
beneficiaries was eligible to receive a $350 dividend – that’s
more than $125 million going into the Auckland economy.
Entrust Trustees are (left to right):
Alastair Bell, Rachel Adams Langton, Denise Lee (Chair), Angus Ogilvie and Dr Paul Hutchison.
Vector Annual Report 202550
Entrust, majority shareholder of Vector
Other
disclosures
Other disclosures
51
Operating
statistics
YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE20252024
ELECTRICITY
Customers
1, 4
632,106624,330
New connections12,54815,959
Net movement in customers
2
7,77611,421
Volume distributed (GWh)8,6348,754
SAIDI (minutes)
3
Normal operations – unplanned76.698.4
Normal operations – planned49.255.8
Major network events16.314.1
Total142.1168.3
GAS DISTRIBUTION
Customers
1,4
120,621120,354
New connections1,2961,934
Net movement in customers2267723
Volume distributed (PJ)11.913.0
1 As at 30 June.
2. Net number of customers added during the period, includes disconnected, reconnected and decommissioned installation control points (ICPs).
3. SAIDI minutes for the regulatory year ended 31 March (audited).
4 Billable ICPs.
Vector Annual Report 202552
Operating statistics
Five-year financial
performance
YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE ($ MILLION)20252024202320222021
PROFIT OR LOSS
Total revenue – continuing operations
1
1,104.01,013.0963.9902.9844.6
Adjusted EBITDA – continuing operations
1
401.1345.3311.0316.8316.8
Depreciation and amortisation – continuing
operations
1
(231.4)(218.3)(193.7)(182.8)(168.2)
Adjusted EBIT – continuing operations
1
169.7127.0117.3134.0148.6
Net profit – continuing operations
1
154.775.6101.5137.3131.5
Total revenue – discontinued operations79.2228.6487.2436.1434.7
Adjusted EBITDA – discontinued operations12.936.5212.3193.2196.7
Depreciation and amortisation – discontinued
operations(1.6)(12.5)(64.4)(107.0)(101.9)
Adjusted EBIT – discontinued operations11.323.9147.986.294.8
Net profit – including discontinued
operations
2
167.791.01,715.8160.9194.6
BALANCE SHEET
Total equity3,600.93,776.73,958.02,430.12,335.4
Total assets6,922.37,125.67,527.66,812.26,519.5
Economic net debt
3
2,148.32,128.61,933.13,296.83,110.6
CASH FLOW
Operating cash flow515.2445.1517.1518.8499.1
Capital expenditure(474.9)(488.7)(639.0)(558.8)(516.2)
Dividends paid(268.7)(234.9)(169.9)(169.1)(165.8)
KEY FINANCIAL MEASURES
Adjusted EBITDA/total revenue
1
36.3%34.1%32.3%35.1%37.5%
Adjusted EBIT/total revenue
1
15.4%12.5%12.2%14.8%17.6%
Equity/total assets52.0%53.0%52.6%35.7%35.8%
Return on assets (adjusted EBITDA/assets)
1
5.8%4.8%4.1%4.6%4.9%
Gearing
4
37.3%36.2%33.1%58.2%56.8%
Net interest cover (adjusted EBIT/net interest
costs) (times)2.52.91.82.12.2
Earnings (NPAT) per share (cents)16.78.9171.515.919.3
Dividends declared, cents per share25.0024.0022.2516.7516.75
1. Excludes contribution from gas trading businesses (sold in year ended 30 June 2025) and the metering business (sold on 30 June 2023) for all periods presented.
2. One-off items included in total net profit: FY2025 includes a $37 million non-cash impairment, FY2024 includes a $60.6 million non-cash impairment.
FY2023 includes a $1,509.9 million gain on the 50% sale of the metering operations. FY2022 includes a $40.2 million non-cash impairment.
3. Economic net debt is borrowings and lease liabilities net of cash and cash equivalents and deposits.
4. Gearing is defined as economic net debt to economic net debt plus adjusted equity. Adjusted equity means total equity adjusted for hedge reserves.
53
Five-year financial performance
ADJUSTED EBITDA
$ MILLION
ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION
GAS DISTRIBUTION
OTHER
DISCONTINUED
OPERATIONS – GAS TRADING
DISCONTINUED
OPERATIONS – NATURAL GAS
DISCONTINUED
OPERATIONS – METERING
TOTAL GROUP
TOTAL CONTINUING
OPERATIONS
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021
513.5 509.9
523.3
381.8
414.0
316.8
316.8
311.0
345.3
401.1
ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION
GAS DISTRIBUTION
OTHER
1
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS – GAS TRADING
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS – NATURAL GAS
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS – METERING
TOTAL GROUP
TOTAL CONTINUING OPERATIONS
REVENUE
$ MILLION
0
300
600
900
1200
1500
FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021
844.6
1,279.3
902.9
1,339.0
963.9
1,451.1
1,013.0
1,104.0
1,241.6
1,183.2
1. Includes eliminations of transactions between
segments, and with discontinued operations.
OPERATING CASH FLOWS
$ MILLION
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
550
FY25FY24FY23FY22FY21
499.1
518.8
517.1
445.1
515.2
4.0%
0.6%
4.0%
91.4%
F
Y
2
0
2
5
F
Y
2
0
2
4
2.1%
89.6%
4.4%
3.9%
CAPITAL EXPENDITURE
ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION
GAS DISTRIBUTION
OTHER
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS – GAS TRADING
62.7%
37.3%
F
Y
2
0
2
5
F
Y
2
0
2
4
36.2%63.8%
ECONOMIC NET DEBT
ADJUSTED EQUITY
SOURCE OF FUNDING – GEARING
AS AT 30 JUNE
Vector Annual Report 202554
Other disclosures
Non-GAAP financial
information
Vector’s standard profit measure
prepared under New Zealand
Generally Accepted Accounting
Practice (GAAP) is net profit.
Vector has used non-GAAP profit
measures when discussing financial
performance in this document.
The directors and management
believe that these measures
provide useful information as they
are used internally to evaluate the
performance of business units, to
establish operational goals and
to allocate resources. For a more
comprehensive discussion on the use
of non-GAAP profit measures, please
refer to the policy ‘Reporting non-
GAAP profit measures’ available on
our website (vector.co.nz).
Non-GAAP profit measures are
not prepared in accordance with
New Zealand International Reporting
Standards (NZ IFRS) and are not
uniformly defined; therefore,
the non-GAAP profit measures
reported in this document may
not be comparable with those
that other companies report and
should not be viewed in isolation
from or considered as a substitute
for measures reported by Vector in
accordance with NZ IFRS.
Definitions:
EBITDA
Earnings before interest, taxation,
depreciation, amortisation,
impairment, associates and fair
value changes.
Adjusted EBITDA
EBITDA adjusted for customer
contributions, and significant one-
off gains, losses, revenues and/or
expenses.
20252024
YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE ($ MILLION)
Segment adjusted EBITDA
SEGMENT
EBITDA
LESS CAPITAL
CONTRIBUTIONS
SEGMENT
ADJUSTED
EBITDA
SEGMENT
EBITDA
LESS CAPITAL
CONTRIBUTIONS
AND OTHER
MOVEMENTS
SEGMENT
ADJUSTED
EBITDA
Electricity distribution547.8 (195.9)351.9 478.3 (183.2)295.1
Gas distribution60.0 (13.3)46.7 55.5 (10.7)44.8
Total reported segments607.8 (209.2)398.6 533.8 (193.9)339.9
Other3.8 (1.3)2.5 6.8 (1.4)5.4
Total – continuing operations611.6 (210.5)401.1 540.6 (195.3)345.3
Discontinued operations –
gas trading12.9 – 12.9 19.9 – 19.9
Discontinued operations –
natural gas– – – 16.6 – 16.6
Total discontinued operations12.9 – 12.9 36.5 – 36.5
Total group624.5 (210.5)414.0 577.1 (195.3)381.8
GAAP to Non-GAAP reconciliation
YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE ($ MILLION)
Group EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA20252024
Reported net profit for the period (GAAP) – continuing operations154.7 75.6
Add back: net interest costs72.4 52.1
Add back: tax (benefit)/expense86.5 97.7
Add back: depreciation and amortisation231.4 218.3
Add back: impairment37.0 60.0
Add back: associates (share of net (profit)/loss)21.1 24.9
Add back: fair value changes on financial instruments8.5 12.0
EBITDA611.6 540.6
Adjusted for:
Capital contributions(210.5)(195.3)
Adjusted EBITDA – continuing operations401.1 345.3
Adjusted EBITDA – discontinued operations12.9 36.5
Total group adjusted EBITDA414.0 381.8
55
Non-GAAP financial information
Financials
Vector Annual Report 202556
CONTENTS
Financial Statements
Profit or Loss 58
Other Comprehensive Income 59
Balance Sheet 60
Cash Flows 61
Changes in Equity 62
Notes to the Financial Statements 63
Independent Auditor’s Report 104
Financial Statements
2025 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
These financial statements for the year ended 30 June 2025 are dated 22 August
2025, and signed for and on behalf of Vector Limited by:
Chair 22 August 2025
Chair, audit committee 22 August 2025
And management of Vector Limited by:
Group Chief Executive 22 August 2025
Chief Financial Officer 22 August 2025
57
Financial statements
Profit or Loss
for the year ended 30 June
NOTE
2025
$M
2024
$M
Continuing operations
1
:
Revenue71,104.01,013.0
Operating expenses8(492.4)(472.4)
Depreciation and amortisation(231.4)(218.3)
Interest income925.651.7
Interest costs 10(98.0)(103.8)
Impairment of goodwill14(37.0)(60.0)
Fair value change on financial instruments24.2(8.5)(12.0)
Share of net profit/(loss) in joint ventures17.1(21.1)(24.9)
Profit/(loss) before income tax241.2173.3
Income tax benefit/(expense)18(86.5)(97.7)
Net profit/(loss) for the period from continuing operations154.775.6
Net profit/(loss) for the period from discontinued operations5, 613.015.4
Net profit/(loss) for the period 167.791.0
Net profit/(loss) for the period attributable to
Owners of the parent – continuing operations154.775.6
Owners of the parent – discontinued operations11.813.0
Non-controlling interests – discontinued operations1.22.4
Basic and diluted earnings per share (cents)
Continuing operations27.315.57.6
Discontinued operations27.31.21.3
Total16.78.9
1 The comparative information is restated due to discontinued operations. Refer to notes 5 and 6.
Vector Annual Report 202558
Financial statements
Other Comprehensive Income
for the year ended 30 June
NOTE
2025
$M
2024
$M
Net profit/(loss) for the period167.791.0
Other comprehensive income net of tax – continuing operations
Items that may be re-classified subsequently to profit or loss:
Net change in fair value of hedge reserves24.3(37.4)(29.5)
Translation of foreign operations(2.3)(1.5)
Items that will not be re-classified subsequently to profit or loss:
Share of other comprehensive income of joint ventures17.1(19.9)1.9
Fair value change on financial asset–(8.3)
Other comprehensive income for the period net of tax – continuing operations(59.6)(37.4)
Total comprehensive income for the period net of tax108.153.6
Total comprehensive income for the period attributable to
Owners of the parent – continuing operations95.138.2
Owners of the parent – discontinued operations11.813.0
Non-controlling interests – discontinued operations1.22.4
59
Financial statements
Balance Sheet
as at 30 June
NOTE
2025
$M
2024
$M
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents1123.377.4
Short-term deposits11–27.2
Trade and other receivables13100.9100.0
Contract assets92.597.7
Derivatives242.53.2
Inventories11.526.4
Contingent consideration128.112.4
Intangible assets–7.6
Income tax1819.620.2
Disposal group held for sale6–9.7
Total current assets258.4381.8
NON-CURRENT ASSETS
Receivables134.41.0
Derivatives2463.883.2
Contingent consideration1220.029.9
Investment in joint venture17.1605.5684.2
Investment in private equity–0.5
Intangible assets141,051.91,132.1
Property, plant and equipment (PPE)154,807.94,667.2
Right of use assets (ROU)16.141.358.3
Income tax1869.085.3
Deferred tax190.12.1
Total non-current assets6,663.96,743.8
Total asset s6,922.37,125.6
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Trade and other payables20206.4223.1
Provisions210.92.3
Borrowings23–249.5
Derivatives240.30.5
Contract liabilities 52.673.9
Lease liabilities16.26.07.1
Income tax18–0.7
Total current liabilities266.2557.1
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES
Provisions21–7.1
Borrowings232,049.11,789.0
Derivatives24143.6165.7
Contract liabilities2.96.8
Lease liabilities16.245.561.0
Deferred tax 19814.1762.2
Total non-current liabilities3,055.22,791.8
Total liabilities3,321.43,348.9
EQUITY
Equity attributable to owners of the parent3,600.93,761.5
Non-controlling interests in subsidiaries–15.2
Total equity3,600.93,776.7
Total equity and liabilities6,922.37,125.6
Net tangible assets per share (cents)27.3254.9262.2
Gearing ratio (%)27.337.336.2
Vector Annual Report 202560
Financial statements
Cash Flows
for the year ended 30 June
NOTE
2025
$M
2024
$M
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Receipts from customers973.11,053.1
Customer contributions received190.0179.3
Interest received 24.433.5
Payments to suppliers and employees(566.5)(704.6)
Interest paid(103.1)(111.4)
Income tax paid (2.7)(4.8)
Net cash flows from/(used in) operating activities26.1515.2445.1
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from sale of PPE and software intangibles0.42.7
Purchase and construction of PPE (443.7)(464.7)
Purchase and development of software intangibles(31.2)(24.0)
Proceeds from contingent consideration1210.811.4
Proceeds from sale of discontinued operations5,6158.0–
Cash balance disposed in sale of discontinued operations6(5.6)–
Repayments of loans advanced36.295.6
Proceeds from sale of investment in associate–1.4
Other investing cash flows0.7(15.4)
Net cash flows from/(used in) investing activities(274.4)(393.0)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from borrowings3260.015.0
Repayments of borrowings3(305.0)(255.0)
Dividends paid 3(268.7)(234.9)
Lease liabilities payments(8.4)(9.6)
Net cash flows from/(used in) financing activities(322.1)(484.5)
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents(81.3)(432.4)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period104.6537.0
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period23.3104.6
Cash and cash equivalents comprise:
Bank balances and on-call deposits23.377.4
Short-term deposits –27.2
23.3104.6
Discontinued operations
The cash flows above reflect the entire Vector group cash flows for the year ended 30 June 2025. Refer to note 6 for separately
disclosed cash flows from discontinued operations. Comparative information also includes cash flows from discontinued
operations from Vector’s natural gas and gas trading businesses, refer to notes 5 and 6 for more information.
61
Financial statements
Changes in Equity
for the year ended 30 June
NOTE
ISSUED
SHARE
CAPITAL
W$M
TREASURY
SHARES
$M
HEDGE
RESERVES
$M
OTHER
RESERVES
$M
RETAINED
EARNINGS
$M
NON-
CONTROLLING
INTERESTS
$M
TOTAL
EQUITY
$M
Balance at 30 June 2023880.0(0.1)55.7(5.0)3,012.215.23,958.0
Net profit/(loss) for the period––––88.62.491.0
Other comprehensive income––(29.5)(7.9)––(37.4)
Total comprehensive income––(29.5)(7.9)88.62.453.6
Dividends ––––(232.5)(2.4)(234.9)
Total transactions with owners––––(232.5)(2.4)(234.9)
Balance at 30 June 2024880.0(0.1)26.2(12.9)2,868.315.23,776.7
Net profit/(loss) for the period–––– 166.51.2167.7
Other comprehensive income––(37.4)(8.8)(13.4)–(59.6)
Total comprehensive income––(37.4)(8.8)153.11.2108.1
Dividends 3–––– (267.5)(1.2)(268.7)
Sale of discontinued
operations6–––––(15.2)(15.2)
Total transactions with owners–––– (267.5)(16.4)(283.9)
Balance at 30 June 2025880.0(0.1)(11.2)(21.7)2,753.9– 3,600.9
Vector Annual Report 202562
Financial statements
Notes to the Financial Statements
Note 1Company information64
Note 2Summary of material accounting policies64
Note 3Material transactions and events65
Note 4Segment information66
Note 5Discontinued operations – natural gas69
Note 6Discontinued operations – gas trading70
Note 7Revenue72
Note 8Operating expenses73
Note 9Interest income74
Note 10Interest costs74
Note 11Cash and cash equivalents and short-term deposits74
Note 12Contingent consideration75
Note 13Trade and other receivables75
Note 14Intangible assets77
Note 15Property, plant and equipment (PPE)79
Note 16Leases80
Note 17Investments82
Note 18Income tax expense/(benefit)84
Note 19Deferred tax85
Note 20Trade and other payables85
Note 21Provisions86
Note 22Fair values87
Note 23Borrowings89
Note 24Derivatives and hedge accounting91
Note 25Financial risk management 97
Note 26Cash flows100
Note 27Equity101
Note 28Related party transactions103
Note 29Contingent liabilities 103
Note 30Events after balance date103
63
Notes to the financial statements
1. Company information
Reporting entityVector Limited is a company incorporated and domiciled in New Zealand, registered under
the Companies Act 1993 and listed on the NZX Main Board (NZSX). The company is an FMC
reporting entity for the purposes of Part 7 of the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013. The
financial statements comply with this Act.
The financial statements presented are for Vector Limited Group (“Vector” or “the group”) as
at, and for the year ended 30 June 2025. The group comprises Vector Limited (“the parent”)
and its subsidiaries (together referred to as “the group”).
In accordance with the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013, where a reporting entity prepares
consolidated financial statements, parent company disclosures are not required.
Vector Limited is a 75.1% owned subsidiary of Entrust which is the ultimate parent entity for
the group.
The primary operations of the group are electricity and gas distribution, telecommunications
and new energy solutions.
2. Summary of material
accounting policies
Statement of complianceThe financial statements comply with New Zealand equivalents to International Financial
Reporting Standards (NZ IFRS), and other applicable Financial Reporting Standards, as
appropriate for Tier 1 for-profit entities. They also comply with International Financial
Reporting Standards.
Basis of preparationThe financial statements have been prepared in accordance with New Zealand Generally
Accepted Accounting Practice (NZ GAAP) as appropriate to Tier 1 for-profit entities.
They are prepared on the historical cost basis except for the following items, which are
measured at fair value:
—the identifiable assets and liabilities acquired in a business combination;
—certain financial instruments; and
—contingent consideration receivable as disclosed in the notes to the financial statements
The presentation currency is New Zealand dollars ($). All financial information has been
rounded to the nearest 100,000, unless otherwise stated.
The statements of profit or loss, other comprehensive income, cash flows and changes in
equity are stated exclusive of GST. All items in the balance sheet are stated exclusive of GST
except for trade receivables and trade payables, which include GST.
Material accounting estimates
and judgements
Vector’s management is required to make judgements, estimates, and apply assumptions that
affect the amounts reported in the financial statements. They have based these on historical
experience and other factors they believe to be reasonable. The table below lists the key areas
of judgements and estimates in preparing these financial statements:
Key areasJudgements / EstimatesNote
Valuation of contingent consideration receivableEstimates12, 22
Intangible assets: valuation of goodwill, risk of impairmentEstimates14
Property, plant and equipment: classification of costsJudgements15
Leases: assessment of lease term for perpetual leases and
leases with renewal optionsJudgements16
Valuation of derivative financial instrumentsEstimates22, 24
New standards and
interpretations adopted
A number of new standards and interpretations are effective from 1 July 2024, but they do not
have a material effect on the group’s financial statements. The financial statements for the
year ended 30 June 2025 have applied the amendment to FRS-44 Disclosure of Fees for Audit
Firms’ Services, which specifies disclosures relating to fees paid to the auditors. Refer to note 8
for further details.
A number of new standards and interpretations are effective for annual periods beginning
on or after 1 July 2025 and earlier application is permitted, however the group has not early
adopted the new or amended standards in preparing these consolidated financial statements.
Vector has considered the impact of standards and interpretations not yet effective and do not
expect any of these to have a material impact.
Vector Annual Report 202564
Notes to the financial statements
3. Material transactions
and events
Material transactions and events that have impacted the financial year ended 30 June 2025:
Sale of discontinued
operations
On 1 July 2024, Vector completed the sale of the remaining contracts in the natural gas
business to Nova Energy Limited. Refer to note 5 for further details.
On 31 January 2025, Vector completed the sale of LPG business Vector Ongas, and the
group’s shareholding in Liquigas Limited, to Elgas Limited for $150.0 million. Vector Ongas
and Liquigas were previously included in the gas trading segment. Refer to note 6 for further
details.
Commerce commission
decisions
The Commission is currently consulting on the price reset for its fourth Default Price-quality
Path (“DPP4”), which relates to the period beginning 1 October 2026 for gas distribution
businesses. They have released an open letter in February 2025, and an issues paper for
submissions was released in June 2025. Vector provided submissions to the issues paper on 24
July 2025. The draft decision is expected in November 2025, with the final decision in May 2026.
This decision will impact the future cash flows we can expect to earn from the gas distribution
business.
Regulatory quality thresholdsFor both the regulatory years to 31 March 2024 and 31 March 2025, Vector was not in breach of
its unplanned SAIDI and SAIFI quality limits.
Regulatory consultationsIn October 2024, the Electricity Authority opened two consultations.
The first of these is the Distribution connection pricing proposed code amendment
consultation, which purports to improve connection pricing methodologies, so they are more
efficient and have greater consistency across distributors.
The second consultation, the ‘Network connection project – stage one’ seeks to improve
the efficiency of connecting to the electricity distribution network and upgrading existing
connections.
The decisions of both consultations were released on 18 July 2025. These determinations
will influence how Vector manages its customer connections. The Electricity Authority has
indicated it will continue to engage with distributors regarding the level of contributions that
can be charged for customer connections, while deferring a final decision on this issue for
further consideration.
Debt programmeIn May 2025, Vector repaid $250.0 million of senior bonds.
During the year ended 30 June 2025, the group drew down $260.0 million and repaid
$55.0 million of bank facilities for a net drawdown of $205.0 million from the bank facilities
(year ended 30 June 2024: net nil movement). Refer to note 23 for more details on borrowings.
Impairment of goodwillDuring the year ended 30 June 2025, the group recognised an impairment loss of $37.0 million
in respect of goodwill allocated to the gas distribution CGU (year ended 30 June 2024:
$60.0 million).
The uncertainty of future price-quality path regulation for gas distribution poses a risk for
further impairment. The DPP4, expected in May 2026 (see Commerce commission decisions)
impacts the future cash flows we can expect to earn from the regulated gas distribution
business, and will be reflected in the impairment testing of the gas distribution CGU.
DividendsIn February 2025, the board approved an updated dividend policy, targeting distribution
of 70-100% of free cash flow in each financial year. The intent is to align the policy with the
Commission’s five-yearly regulatory cycle, as this is a large part of what determines Vector’s
revenue and earnings in each five year period.
Vector Limited’s final dividend for the year ended 30 June 2024 of 14.75 cents per share was
paid on 16 September 2024, comprising an ordinary unimputed dividend of 13.00 cents per
share and a special unimputed dividend of 1.75 cents per share. The total dividend paid was
$147.5 million.
Vector Limited’s interim dividend for the year ended 30 June 2025 of 12.00 cents per share
(unimputed) was paid on 31 March 2025. The total dividend paid was $120.0 million.
Liquigas Limited, a subsidiary of the group until the sale of the gas trading business on
31 January 2025, paid dividends of $1.2 million to the company’s non-controlling interests
during the year ended 30 June 2025.
65
Notes to the financial statements
4. Segment information
SegmentsVector report on two reportable segments in accordance with NZ IFRS 8 Operating Segments.
These segments are reported internally to the group chief executive. This reporting is used to
assess performance and make decisions about the allocation of resources.
The segments are:
Electricity distributionAuckland electricity distribution services.
Gas distributionAuckland gas distribution services.
Since Vector’s Annual Report for the year ended 30 June 2024, the gas trading businesses
within the gas trading segment have been reclassified as discontinued operations held for
sale, and the gas trading segment is no longer a reportable segment.
Following the reclassification of the gas trading segment, Vector’s reportable segments
were assessed in accordance with NZ IFRS 8 Operating Segments. This has resulted in the
electricity and gas distribution segments being recognised as separate reporting segments
for the year ended 30 June 2025. These were previously combined into the regulated networks
reportable segment.
Other includes telecommunications, digital services, energy solution services and corporate
operations. The reportable segments have also been updated to include a portion of shared
corporate costs, in line with allocations used for the most recent regulatory reporting period.
On 31 January 2025, the gas trading business was sold. Further details of the sale of the gas
trading business can be found in note 6.
Comparative information has been updated to reflect these changes. There have been no
other changes to the reportable segments and policies.
Segment profitThe measures of segment profit reported are earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) and
earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, amortisation and impairments (EBITDA). Both are
non-GAAP measures that do not have a standardised meaning under NZ IFRS.
Activities not reported in
segments
Other activities engaged by the group comprise shared services and other business activities,
and discontinued operations. Revenues generated by these activities are incidental to Vector’s
operations and/or do not meet the definition of an operating segment under NZ IFRS 8. The
results for these activities are reported in the reconciliations of segment information to the
group’s financial statements, and the discontinued operations note.
Interest income, interest costs, fair value change on financial instruments and share of net
profit/(loss) in joint venture are not allocated to the segments.
Geographical informationThe group derives the majority of its revenue from external customers in New Zealand.
Major customersVector engages with four major customers, each of which contribute greater than ten percent
of the group’s revenue. These customers are large energy retailers. For the year ended
30 June 2025, the customers contributed $222.8 million (2024: $209.7 million), $131.6 million
(2024: $118.3 million), $131.5 million (2024: $115.0 million) and $123.4 million (2024: $117.0 million)
respectively, which is reported across all segments.
Vector Annual Report 202566
Notes to the financial statements
4. Segment information continued
30 JUN 2025
12 MONTHS
ELECTRICITY
DISTRIBUTION
$M
GAS
DISTRIBUTION
$M
OTHER
$M
INTER-
SEGMENT
ELIMINATIONS
$M
TOTAL
$M
External revenue:
Sales762.267.264.1–893.5
Customer contributions195.913.31.3–210.5
Inter-segment revenue2.0–16.7(18.7)–
Segment revenue960.180.582.1(18.7)1,104.0
External expenses:
Electricity transmission expenses(200.7)–––(200.7)
Network and asset maintenance(76.5)(8.3)(2.8)–(87.6)
Employee benefit expenses(45.9)(4.5)(29.4)–(79.8)
Other expenses(76.4)(7.6)(40.3)–(124.3)
Inter-segment expenses(12.8)(0.1)(5.8)18.7–
Segment operating expenses(412.3)(20.5)(78.3)18.7(492.4)
Segment EBITDA547.860.03.8–611.6
Depreciation and amortisation(181.1)(29.2)(21.1)–(231.4)
Impairment–(37.0)––(37.0)
Segment EBIT366.7(6.2)(17.3)–343.2
Segment capital expenditure432.019.019.1–470.1
Reconciliation of segment reporting to profit or loss:
30 JUN 2025
12 MONTHS
$M
Segment EBIT reported in the segment information343.2
Interest income25.6
Interest costs(98.0)
Fair value change on financial instruments(8.5)
Share of net profit/(loss) in joint venture(21.1)
Profit before tax from continuing operations241.2
67
Notes to the financial statements
4. Segment information continued
30 JUN 2024 (restated)
12 MONTHS
ELECTRICITY
DISTRIBUTION
$M
GAS
DISTRIBUTION
$M
OTHER
$M
INTER-
SEGMENT
ELIMINATIONS
$M
TOTAL
$M
External revenue:
Sales687.465.165.2–817.7
Customer contributions183.210.71.4–195.3
Inter-segment revenue2.0–15.6(17.6)–
Segment revenue872.675.882.2(17.6)1,013.0
External expenses:
Electricity transmission expenses(188.9)–––(188.9)
Network and asset maintenance(74.5)(8.2)(3.2)–(85.9)
Employee benefit expenses(45.4)(4.7)(31.3)–(81.4)
Other expenses(72.6)(7.1)(36.5)–(116.2)
Inter-segment expenses(12.9)(0.3)(4.4)17.6–
Segment operating expenses(394.3)(20.3)(75.4)17.6(472.4)
Segment EBITDA478.355.56.8–540.6
Depreciation and amortisation(171.3)(25.1)(21.9)–(218.3)
Impairment –(60.0)––(60.0)
Segment EBIT307.0(29.6)(15.1)–262.3
Segment capital expenditure457.022.220.0–499.2
Reconciliation of segment reporting to profit or loss:
30 JUN 2024
12 MONTHS
$M
Segment EBIT reported in the segment information262.3
Interest income51.7
Interest costs(103.8)
Fair value change on financial instruments(12.0)
Share of net profit/(loss) in joint venture(24.9)
Profit before tax from continuing operations173.3
Vector Annual Report 202568
Notes to the financial statements
5. Discontinued operations – natural gas
On 1 July 2024, Vector completed the sale of the remaining contracts in the natural gas business to Nova Energy Limited
for consideration of $9.7 million, which was equal to the carrying amount of the business. No gain or loss on disposal was
recognised. At 30 June 2025, Vector had received $8.0 million of the consideration, with the last instalment due on 31 July 2025.
The disposal group was presented as discontinued operations in the interim financial statements for the six months ended
31 December 2023 as well as in the 2024 Annual Report. Comparatives show the discontinued operations separately from the
continuing operations.
Carrying value of net assets sold as at 1 July 2024$M
Intangible assets 9.7
Net assets sold9.7
Net cash consideration9.7
Gain/(loss) on sale of discontinued operations – natural gas–
PoliciesVector classifies a disposal group as held for sale if its carrying amount will be recovered
principally through a sale transaction rather than through continuing use. The disposal
group is measured at the lower of carrying amount and fair value less costs to sell.
The two criteria that must be met to classify a disposal group as held for sale are:
—The disposal group is available for immediate sale in its present condition; and
—The sale transaction is highly probable.
A disposal group that is sold or held for sale is also reported as discontinued operations if it
meets the below criteria:
—It is a component of the groups’ business, the operations and cash flows of which can be
clearly distinguished from the rest of the group; and
—It represents a separate major line of business or geographical area of operations.
Impairment on reclassification
to held for sale
The goodwill allocated to the natural gas business had been reclassified as held for sale at
30 June 2024, resulting in an impairment of $0.6 million.
69
Notes to the financial statements
6. Discontinued operations – gas trading
On 25 July 2024, Vector signed a conditional agreement for the sale of the Ongas LPG business, and shares in Liquigas Limited
(“the gas trading business”). The sale was completed on 31 January 2025.
The gas trading business was previously included in the group’s gas trading segment. For the year ended 30 June 2025, the
financial results of the disposal group are reported as discontinued operations in the profit or loss statement. Additionally, prior
year figures have been restated to clearly separate discontinued operations from continuing ones.
Profit and loss of discontinued operations – gas trading
2025
7 MONTHS
$M
2024
12 MONTHS
$M
Revenue79.2128.3
Operating expenses(66.3)(108.4)
Depreciation and amortisation(1.6)(12.5)
Interest income0.20.3
Interest cost(0.7)(0.9)
Profit/(loss) before income tax10.86.8
Income tax benefit/(expense)(1.7)(2.5)
Net profit/(loss) for the period before gain on sale9.14.3
Gain on sale (net of tax)3.9–
Net profit/(loss) for the period – discontinued operations – gas trading13.04.3
2025
7 MONTHS
$M
2024
12 MONTHS
$M
Capital expenditure of discontinued operations – gas trading2.910.9
Cash flows from discontinued operations – gas trading
2025
7 MONTHS
$M
2024
12 MONTHS
$M
Net cash flows from/(used) in operating activities14.325.7
Net cash flows from/(used in) investing activities(3.6)(8.4)
Net cash flows from/(used in) financing activities (3.4) (7.1)
Net cash inflow/(outflow)7.310.2
Revenue – gas trading sales
Sale of LPG – comprises bulk
LPG sales to commercial
customers and bottled LPG
sales to both commercial
and residential customers.
Revenue is recognised at a point in time when LPG is delivered to a customer’s site.
Billing to a customer occurs after completion of deliveries and at the end of each month
with payment terms ranging from 60 days to 90 days.
Distribution of LPG – The
group provides services in
the areas of bulk LPG storage,
distribution and management.
Revenue is recognised over time in line with a customer’s consumption of monthly tolling
and storage volumes and measured at the transaction price of the contract. The transaction
price for a monthly tolling and storage contract includes variable consideration in the
form of volume pricing and take or pay arrangements. The group estimates the amount of
variable consideration present in each contract using the expected value method.
Vector Annual Report 202570
Notes to the financial statements
6. Discontinued operations – gas trading continued
Carrying value of net assets sold as at 31 January 2025$M
Cash and cash equivalents5.6
Trade and other receivables16.9
Inventories6.5
Intangible assets (including goodwill)40.9
Property, plant, and equipment105.7
Right of use assets (ROU)11.2
Deferred tax0.6
Trade and other payables(5.0)
Provisions(7.8)
Lease liabilities(11.7)
Income tax(0.6)
Non-controlling interests in Liquigas (15.2)
Net assets sold147.1
Net cash consideration received on completion150.0
Working capital wash-up2.4
Total consideration152.4
Costs of sale(1.4)
Carrying value of net assets sold(147.1)
Gain on sale of discontinued operations – gas trading3.9
Gain on saleVector has elected to follow NZ IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial Statements in recognising
the gain on sale from the transaction.
Under NZ IFRS 10, upon the loss of control of a subsidiary, any retained interest should
be remeasured to its fair value, with any resulting gain or loss recognised in the income
statement.
ConsiderationUpon completion of the sale, the group recognised a total of $152.4 million in consideration,
representing a combination of $150.0 million in cash consideration and $2.4 million for the
final working capital wash-up.
Depreciation and
amortisation
The gas trading business was classified as held for sale in July 2024, and its assets and
liabilities were presented as a disposal group held for sale in the FY25 interim financial
statements. Depreciation and amortisation on the assets of the gas trading business ceased
from July 2024 due to the held for sale classification.
71
Notes to the financial statements
7. Revenue
7.1 Revenue from contracts with customers
2025
$M
2024
$M
Regulated networks – sale of distribution services829.4752.5
Regulated networks - third party contributions209.2193.9
Other65.466.6
Total 1,104.01,013.0
Revenue streamsSatisfaction of performance obligation
Regulated networks – sale of
distribution services
The group receives revenue from
business customers and energy
retailers who sell energy to end
customers for electricity and gas
distribution services in Auckland.
Revenue from electricity and gas distribution services is measured at the value of
consideration received, or receivable, to the extent that pricing is determined by the
regulator within a defined revenue path.
Revenue is recognised over time on a basis that corresponds with end consumers’
pattern of electricity and gas consumption. Customers are billed monthly in arrears for
distribution services, including both a fixed portion, and variable pricing measured in
units of electricity and gas distributed. Revenue from distribution services therefore
includes an accrual for services provided but not billed at the end of the month.
The accrual is determined based on the group’s estimate of volume distributed in the
month using the most recent data available. A large portion of the contract assets at
balance date consists of this accrual.
Regulated networks – third party
contributions
The group receives contributions
from residential and commercial
customers towards the construction
of distribution system assets in
the Auckland electricity or gas
distribution networks.
Third party contributions are recognised as revenue over time, reflecting the
percentage completion of the underlying construction activity. The group recognises
a contract liability to account for consideration received from the customer but where
the agreed construction activity is not completed; and conversely a contract asset is
recognised to account for activities completed not billed.
The transaction price for third party contributions is netted against estimated rebates
payable to commercial customers. A contract liability is recognised to account for
payments received from customers for construction activities completed which are
eligible for rebates in the future based on completion of developments.
In the event that a contract combines a contribution towards an agreed construction
activity with sale of electricity or gas distribution services, the group unbundles the
contract into two performance obligations and recognises revenue in accordance
with each obligation’s accounting policy.
Other revenue streamsOther revenue includes telecommunications revenue and revenue from providing
energy solution services.
Telecommunications revenue from commercial customers comprise the sale of
fibre services. Revenue is recognised at the point in time of supply and customer
consumption.
Energy solutions services comprise predominantly the sale of home and commercial
ventilation and solar services. Revenue is recognised over time, reflecting the
percentage completion of each ventilation and solar system install.
Vector Annual Report 202572
Notes to the financial statements
7. Revenue continued
7.2 Revenue in relation to contract liabilities
The following table sets out the expected timing of future recognition of revenue relating to performance obligations not
satisfied (or partially satisfied) at balance date:
2025
1 - 2 YEARS
$M
3 - 4 YEARS
$M
TOTAL
$M
Electricity distribution services0.4–0.4
Telecommunication services0.20.81.0
Total0.60.81.4
2024
1 - 2 YEARS
$M
3 - 4 YEARS
$M
TOTAL
$M
Electricity distribution services2.0–2.0
Telecommunication services1.7–1.7
Total3.7–3.7
PoliciesNo information is provided in relation to the remaining performance obligations at 30 June
2025 or 30 June 2024 that have an original duration of one year or less as permitted by NZ IFRS
15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers.
Revenue recognisedOf the revenue recognised this year, $61.2 million was included in the contract liability balance
at the beginning of the reporting period. (2024: $54.6 million).
8. Operating expenses
NOTE
2025
$M
2024
$M
Electricity transmission 4200.7188.9
Energy solutions cost of sales18.315.1
Network and asset maintenance487.685.9
Other direct expenses48.643.7
Employee benefit expenses479.881.4
Administration expenses13.212.3
Professional fees7.68.3
IT expenses32.031.7
Other indirect expenses 4.65.1
Total 492.4472.4
Fees paid to auditors
Fees were paid to KPMG as follows:
2025
$
2025
$
2024
$
2024
$
Audit or review of financial statements671,200624,500
Audit related services: Regulatory assurance378,000380,000
Regulatory agreed upon procedures121,30021,000
ESG assurance176,50080,500
Other assurance25,70024,200
Other agreed upon procedures10,30015,300
Total audit related services711,800521,000
Tax services: R&D tax credits74,000186,700
Other services: Risk management60,000–
Climate related pre-assurance–97,500
Total 1,517,0001,429,700
73
Notes to the financial statements
8. Operating expenses continued
Fees paid to auditors
continued
The audit fee includes fees for both the annual audit of the financial statements and the review
of the interim financial statements. Regulatory assurance consists of the audit of regulatory
disclosures. Regulatory agreed upon procedures includes compliance and one-off regulatory
assurance reviews. ESG assurance includes climate related disclosures and greenhouse gas
calculations. Other assurance includes the audit of guaranteeing group financial statements
and bond registers. Other agreed upon procedures includes trustee reporting and annual
general meeting vote scrutineering.
9. Interest income
NOTE
2025
$M
2024
$M
Interest income21.245.7
Unwinding of discount of contingent consideration124.46.0
Total 25.651.7
PoliciesInterest income includes income from funds invested and shareholder loans, recognised using
the effective interest rate method.
10. Interest costs`
NOTE
2025
$M
2024
$M
Interest expense95.9101.0
Amortisation of finance costs4.45.1
Capitalised interest(5.6)(5.6)
Interest on leases16.33.33.3
Total 98.0103.8
PoliciesInterest costs include interest expense on borrowings, recognised using the effective interest
rate method.
Capitalised interestVector has capitalised interest to PPE and software intangibles while under construction at an
average rate of 4.4% per annum (2024: 4.2%).
11. Cash and cash equivalents
and short-term deposits
2025
$M
2024
$M
Cash and cash equivalents 23.377.4
Short-term deposits–27.2
PoliciesCash and cash equivalents and short-term deposits are carried at amortised cost.
Cash and cash equivalents includes deposits that are on call, short-term deposits includes
deposits with a maturity date.
Vector Annual Report 202574
Notes to the financial statements
12. Contingent
consideration
NOTE
2025
$M
2024
$M
Carrying value of contingent consideration
Opening balance 42.360.9
Unwinding of discount94.46.0
Payments received26.1(10.8)(11.4)
Fair value movement24.2(7.8)(13.2)
Closing balance at 30 June28.142.3
Comprising:
Current8.112.4
Non-current20.029.9
Key accounting estimateThe fair value of the contingent consideration was estimated by calculating the present value
of the future expected cash flows payable by Todd Petroleum Mining Company Limited to
Vector. The future period of payment is not fixed by the contract but is dependent on the
remaining useful life of the Kapuni gas treatment plant (KGTP), which is directly correlated to
the volume of gas available at the Kapuni gas field and the rate at which the gas is extracted.
The values of future cash flows are highly dependent on the future sale prices of gas products
(LPG and oil) in the market. Underpinning this all is the assumption that there is an active
market for processed gas products in the future and government policy relating to the
transition of New Zealand to a low carbon economy.
Management have re-estimated the same unobservable inputs when calculating the fair value
of the contingent consideration at balance date. Refer to note 22 for details and sensitivity
analysis around material unobservable inputs used in measuring fair values.
13. Trade and other
receivables
2025
$M
2024
$M
Current
Trade receivables 75.469.7
Interest receivable11.718.0
Prepayments8.710.0
Other taxes and duties receivable–1.3
Other receivables5.11.0
Balance at 30 June100.9100.0
Non-current
Other contract receivables0.91.0
Other receivables3.5–
Balance at 30 June 4.41.0
75
Notes to the financial statements
13. Trade and other
receivables continued
At 30 June, the exposure to credit risk for trade and other contract receivables by type of
counterparty was as follows.
2025
$M
2024
$M
Not credit
impaired
Credit
impaired
Not credit
impaired
Credit
impaired
Business customers54.21.144.23.6
Mass market customers (includes
customer contributions)15.2–17.0–
Third party asset damages–10.0–8.3
Residential and other2.00.13.00.3
Total gross amount71.411.264.212.2
Loss allowance–(6.3)–(5.7)
Total carrying amount71.44.964.26.5
The following table provides information about the exposure to credit risk and expected credit
losses for trade and other receivables as at 30 June.
2025
$M
2024
$M
Gross
amount
Loss
allowance
Gross
amount
Loss
allowance
Not past due37.4(0.3)63.5–
Past due 1-30 days30.6(0.1)2.5(0.2)
Past due 31-120 days5.1(0.3)3.7(0.5)
Past due more than 120 days9.5(5.6)6.7(5.0)
Balance at 30 June82.6(6.3)76.4(5.7)
PoliciesTrade receivables are predominantly billed receivables. Sales to business customers are billed
monthly. Trade receivables from mass market, residential and other customers are recognised
as they are originated.
Other receivables represent the amount of contractual cash flows that the group expects
to collect from third parties but that did not arise from contracts with customers. Where
contractual cash flows are expected or contracted to be received after 12 months, the balance
is presented as non-current.
Expected credit lossesIn assessing credit losses for trade receivables, the group applies the simplified approach and
records lifetime expected credit losses (“ECLs”) on trade receivables. The group considers both
quantitative and qualitative inputs. Quantitative data includes past collection rates, industry
statistics, ageing of receivables, and trading outlook. Qualitative inputs include past trading
history with the group.
Lifetime ECLs result from all possible default events over the expected life of a trade
receivable. The group considers the probability of default upon initial recognition of the trade
receivable, based on reasonable and available information on the group’s customers and
groups of customers. The group’s trade receivables are monitored in two groups: business
customers, and mass market residential customers.
The group’s customer acceptance process includes a check on credit history, profitability, and
the customer’s external credit rating if available. Different levels of sale limits are also imposed
on customer accounts by nature.
Vector Annual Report 202576
Notes to the financial statements
14. Intangible assets
EASEMENTS
$M
SOFTWARE
$M
GOODWILL
$M
CAPITAL
WORK IN
PROGRESS
$M
TOTAL
$M
Carrying amount
30 June 202318.972.31,101.015.91,208.1
Cost18.9289.51,252.315.91,576.6
Accumulated amortisation–(217.2)––(217.2)
Accumulated impairment––(151.3)–(151.3)
Additions–––25.525.5
Trans fer s0.216.3–(16.5)–
Transferred to held for sale––(9.7)–(9.7)
Impairment––(60.6)–(60.6)
Amortisation for the period–(31.2)––(31.2)
Carrying amount
30 June 202419.157.41,030.724.91,132.1
Cost19.1305.71,242.624.91,592.3
Accumulated amortisation–(248.3)––(248.3)
Accumulated impairment––(211.9)–(211.9)
Additions–––28.328.3
Trans fer s0.331.7–(32.0)–
Sale of discontinued operations–(0.3)(40.6)–(40.9)
Impairment––(37.0)–(37.0)
Amortisation for the period–(30.6)––(30.6)
Carrying amount
30 June 202519.458.2953.121.21,051.9
Cost19.4327.21,202.021.21,569.8
Accumulated amortisation–(269.0)––(269.0)
Accumulated impairment––(248.9)–(248.9)
14.1 Goodwill
Goodwill by cash generating unit
2025
$M
2024
$M
Electricity881.0881.0
Gas Distribution72.1109.1
Liquigas–40.6
Total 953.11,030.7
PoliciesGoodwill represents the excess of the consideration transferred over the fair value of Vector’s
share of the net identifiable assets of an acquired subsidiary.
Goodwill is carried at cost less accumulated impairment losses.
AllocationGoodwill is monitored internally at a group level. It is allocated to the group’s cash generating
units (“CGUs”), for impairment testing purposes.
This is the highest level permissible under NZ IFRS. The CGUs within the group are: electricity,
gas distribution, communications, technology solutions and E-Co Products. The natural gas
CGU ceased to exist following sale of the business on 1 July 2024. Similarly, the Liquigas and
LPG CGUs ceased to exist following sale of the gas trading business on 31 January 2025.
Goodwill is tested at least annually for impairment, comparing the carrying value against the
recoverable amount of the CGU to which it has been allocated.
77
Notes to the financial statements
14. Intangible assets continued
14.1 Goodwill
Key accounting judgementsTo assess impairment, management must estimate the future cash flows of operating
segments including the CGUs that make up those segments. This entails making judgements
including:
—the expected rate of growth of revenues;
—margins expected to be achieved;
—the level of future maintenance expenditure required to support these outcomes; and
—the appropriate discount rate to apply when discounting future cash flows.
AssumptionsThe recoverable amounts attributed to all of the group’s CGUs are calculated on the basis of
value-in-use using discounted cash flow models.
Future cash flows are forecast based on actual results and business plans.
For the electricity, and gas distribution CGUs, a ten-year period has been used due to the
long-term nature of the group’s capital investment in these businesses and the predictable
nature of their cash flows. A five-year period has been used for the E-Co Products, technology
solutions and communications CGUs.
Projected cash flows for regulated businesses are sensitive to regulatory uncertainty.
Estimated future regulated network revenues and the related supportable levels of operating
and capital expenditure are based on default price-quality path determinations issued by the
Commerce Commission and are in line with estimates published in the asset management
plans.
Gas Distribution
The group has recognised an impairment loss of $37.0 million in respect of goodwill allocated
to the gas distribution CGU. The impairment reflects the ongoing uncertainty facing the
gas industry, lower forecast connections and the decline in gas supply in New Zealand.
The recoverable amount of the gas distribution CGU has been determined based on value in
use. A terminal growth rate of -3.0% (2024: 2.0% to 2.3%) and post-tax discount rates between
6.4% to 6.6% (2024: 6.6% to 6.9%) have been applied in determining the recoverable amount for
the gas distribution CGU.
Risk of impairment
The uncertainty of future price-quality path regulation for gas distribution poses a risk for
further impairment. In November 2025, the Commerce Commission are due to release their
draft decision for the next default price-quality path which will apply from 1 October 2026 for
gas distribution businesses. This decision impacts the future cash flows we can expect to earn
from the regulated gas distribution business and will be reflected in the impairment testing
of the gas distribution CGU. The Commission will release the final decision at the end of May
2026.
At 30 June 2025, the carrying value of the gas distribution CGU was $497.7m and is consistent
with the estimated value of the regulated asset base for gas distribution as at that date.
The carrying value of the CGU includes $72.1 million of goodwill allocated by Vector to its gas
distribution business at 30 June 2025.
Electricity
Terminal growth rates in a range of 2.0% to 2.3% (2024: 2.0% to 2.3%) and post-tax discount
rates between 6.0% to 6.3% (2024: 6.1% to 6.4%) have been applied.
14.2 Other intangible assets
PoliciesOther intangible assets are initially measured at cost and subsequently stated at cost less any
accumulated amortisation and impairment losses.
Software intangibles have been assessed as having a finite life greater than 12 months and are
amortised from the date the asset is ready for use on a straight-line basis over its estimated
useful life. The estimated useful lives (years) are as follows:
Software 3 - 10
Easements are not amortised but are tested for impairment at least annually as part of the
assessment of the carrying values of assets against the recoverable amounts of the CGUs to
which they have been allocated.
Vector Annual Report 202578
Notes to the financial statements
15. Property, plant and equipment (PPE)
DISTRIBUTION
SYSTEMS
$M
LAND,
BUILDINGS AND
IMPROVEMENTS
$M
COMPUTER
AND TELCO
EQUIPMENT
$M
OTHER
PLANT AND
EQUIPMENT
$M
CAPITAL WORK
IN PROGRESS
$M
TOTAL
$M
Carrying amount
30 June 20233,814.2189.594.3135.5151.84,385.3
Cost5,372.0238.4216.0303.8151.86,282.0
Accumulated depreciation(1,557.8)(48.9)(121.7)(168.3)–(1,896.7)
Additions––––473.5473.5
Trans fer s399.922.75.15.4(433.1)–
Disposals(10.1)(0.1)–(0.9)–(11.1)
Depreciation for the period(156.1)(3.8)(8.5)(12.1)–(180.5)
Carrying amount
30 June 20244,047.9208.390.9127.9192.24,667.2
Cost5,743.1252.6219.2308.2192.26,715.3
Accumulated depreciation(1,695.2)(44.3)(128.3)(180.3)–(2,048.1)
Additions–––4.9439.6444.5
Trans fer s435.520.418.96.0(480.8)–
Disposals(7.3)(0.3)–(5.3)–(12.9)
Sale of discontinued operations–(9.3)(0.2)(95.4)(0.8)(105.7)
Other––––(3.4)(3.4)
Depreciation for the period(163.9)(4.4)(10.3)(3.2)–(181.8)
Carrying amount
30 June 20254,312.2214.799.334.9146.84,807.9
Cost6,155.8261.6231.550.7146.86,846.4
Accumulated depreciation (1,843.6)(46.9)(132.2)(15.8)– (2,038.5)
PoliciesPPE is initially measured at cost, and subsequently stated at cost less depreciation and any
impairment losses. Cost may include:
—Consideration paid on acquisition
—Costs to bring the asset to working condition
—Materials used in construction
—Direct labour attributable to the item
—Interest costs attributable to the item
—A proportion of directly attributable overheads incurred
—If there is a future obligation to dismantle and/or remove the item, the costs of doing so
Capitalisation of costs stops when the asset is ready for use.
Subsequent expenditure that increases the economic benefits derived from the asset is
capitalised.
Uninstalled assets are stated at the lower of cost and estimated recoverable amount.
Depreciation commences when an asset becomes available for use.
Depreciation of PPE, other than freehold land and capital work in progress, is calculated on
a straight-line basis and expensed over the useful life of the asset. Useful lives are reviewed
regularly and adjusted as appropriate for the revised expectations, including technical
obsolescence, climate risk and regulatory changes.
Estimated useful lives (years) are as follows:
Buildings40 – 60
Distribution systems5 – 70Computer and telco equipment 2 – 50
Leasehold improvements5 – 20Other plant and equipment 2 – 55
79
Notes to the financial statements
15. Property, plant and
equipment (PPE) continued
Key accounting judgementsThe group’s property, plant and equipment, particularly the group’s distribution assets, are
critical to the running of the group’s business. In assessing whether the costs incurred in a
project on the group’s assets are capital in nature, management must apply the following
judgements:
—Whether the costs incurred are directly attributable to bringing an asset to the location
and condition necessary for it to be capable of operating in the manner intended by
management;
—Whether subsequent costs incurred represent an enhancement to existing assets or
maintain the current operating capability of existing assets; and
—Whether overhead costs can be reasonably allocated to the construction or acquisition of
an asset
Capital commitmentsThe estimated capital expenditure for PPE and software intangibles contracted for at balance
date but not provided is $111.7 million for the group (2024: $138.1 million).
16. Leases
16.1 Right of use assets
LAND,
BUILDINGS AND
IMPROVEMENTS
$M
OTHER
PLANT AND
EQUIPMENT
$M
TOTAL
$M
Carrying amount 30 June 202350.64.955.5
Cost68.06.974.9
Accumulated depreciation(17.4)(2.0)(19.4)
Additions12.41.313.7
Disposals(1.0)(0.1)(1.1)
Depreciation for the period(8.0)(1.8)(9.8)
Carrying amount 30 June 202454.04.358.3
Cost76.07.083.0
Accumulated depreciation(22.0)(2.7)(24.7)
Additions2.21.63.8
Disposals(0.7)(0.1)(0.8)
Sale of discontinued operations(10.5)(0.7)(11.2)
Depreciation for the period(7.3)(1.5)(8.8)
Carrying amount 30 June 202537.73.641.3
Cost62.07.669.6
Accumulated depreciation(24.3)(4.0)(28.3)
16.2 Lease liabilities maturity
analysis
MINIMUM
LEASE
PAYMENTS
$M
INTEREST
$M
PRESENT
VALUE
$M
Within one year9.0(3.0)6.0
One to five years29.2(10.6)18.6
Beyond five years29.6(2.7)26.9
Total67.8(16.3)51.5
Current portion6.0
Non-current portion45.5
Total51.5
Vector Annual Report 202580
Notes to the financial statements
16. Leases continued
16.3 Lease expenses included
in profit or loss
2025
$M
2024
$M
Short-term leases –0.1
Interest on leases3.33.3
16.4 Lease cashflows included
in statement of cash flows
2025
$M
2024
$M
Total cash outflow in relation to leases12.113.6
PoliciesRight of use (“ROU”) assets are measured at cost, less any accumulated depreciation and
impairment losses, and adjusted for any remeasurement of lease liabilities. The cost of
ROU assets includes the amount of lease liabilities recognised, initial direct costs incurred,
restoration obligations, and lease payments made at or before the commencement date less
any lease incentives received.
ROU assets are subsequently depreciated using the straight-line method from the
commencement date to the end of the lease term.
Key accounting judgementsFor leases with renewal options, management include one to all available renewal periods
in the lease term if it is reasonably certain that the renewal option or options will be exercised.
In making this judgement management consider the non-cancellable period of the lease,
other leases or assets associated with the lease in question, and other economic factors such
as availability of similar leases in the market and costs to identify and negotiate another lease
if not renewed.
Several property leases in the group’s portfolio of leases contain renewal options. The
group has estimated the impact from potential future lease payments, should it exercise
these extension options, to be an increase of $31.5 million (2024: $30.1 million) in the group’s
lease liability.
81
Notes to the financial statements
17. Investments
17.1 Investment in joint venture
BLUECURRENTPRINCIPAL ACTIVITYCOUNTRY OF INCORPORATIONEQUITY INTEREST HELD
20252024
Bluecurrent Holdings NZ LimitedMetering servicesNew Zealand50%50%
Bluecurrent Holdings (Australia) Pty LtdMetering servicesAustralia50%50%
Movement in the carrying amount of joint ventureNOTE
2025
$M
2024
$M
Opening carrying value684.2727.4
Shareholder loans28(37.7)(20.2)
Share of net profit/(loss) after tax(21.1)(24.9)
Share of other comprehensive income(19.9)1.9
Closing carrying value605.5684.2
Summary financial information
2025
$M
2024
$M
Summary information for Bluecurrent is not adjusted for the percentage ownership held by the
Group (unless stated)
Current assets115.6100.3
Non-current assets2,746.42,678.8
Total asset s2,862.02,779.1
Current liabilities40.450.5
Non-current liabilities1,956.31,782.2
Total liabilities1,996.71,832.7
Net assets (100%)865.4946.4
Group’s share of net assets432.7473.2
Revenue324.6291.1
Depreciation and amortisation(123.0)(124.2)
Interest expense(117.3)(113.9)
Income tax (expense)/benefit(3.6)6.3
Net profit/(loss) after tax(42.1)(49.7)
Other comprehensive income(39.0)3.5
Total other comprehensive income(81.1)(46.2)
Included in the summary financial information above, Bluecurrent held cash and cash equivalents at 30 June 2025 of
$55.2 million (30 June 2024: $51.4 million), and non-current financial liabilities excluding payables and provisions at 30 June 2025
of $1,827.6 million (30 June 2024: $1,644.7 million).
2025
$M
2024
$M
Reconciliation of the carrying amount of the Group’s investment in Bluecurrent:
Group’s share of net assets432.7473.2
Add: Effect of translation on foreign operations 1.62.1
Add: Shareholder loans171.2208.9
Carrying value of investment in joint venture605.5684.2
Vector Annual Report 202582
Notes to the financial statements
17.2 Investments in subsidiaries
Material entities and holding companies in the group are listed below.
PERCENTAGE HELD
PRINCIPAL ACTIVITY20252024
Trading subsidiaries
Vector Investment Holdings LimitedHolding company100%100%
Vector MeterCo LimitedHolding company100%100%
Liquigas LimitedBulk LPG storage, distribution,
and management
–60%
Vector Communications LimitedTelecommunications 100%100%
Vector ESPS Trustee LimitedTrustee company100%100%
Vector Energy Solutions LimitedHolding company100%100%
Vector Energy Solutions (Australia) Pty LimitedEnergy solutions services100%100%
E-Co Products Group LimitedHolding company100%100%
Cristal Air International LimitedVentilation, heating and water
systems sales and assembly
100%100%
Vector Technology Solutions LimitedTechnology services100%100%
Vector Auckland Property LimitedAssets holding company 100%100%
Vector Northern Property LimitedAssets holding company100%100%
Equalise Cyber Security Limited (formerly VPS Pacific Limited)Cyber security solutions100%100%
Vector Technology Solutions Holdings USA LLCHolding company100%–
VTS USA LLCTechnology services100%–
Non-trading subsidiaries
Vector Advanced Metering Assets (Australia) LimitedInvestment company100%100%
Vector Gas Trading LimitedHolding company100%100%
Vector SPV No. 1 Limited (formerly On Gas Limited)Holding company100%100%
Vector SPV No. 2 Limited (formerly PowerSmart NZ Limited)Holding company100%100%
PoliciesSubsidiaries are entities controlled directly or indirectly by the parent. Vector holds over 50% of
the voting rights in all entities reported as subsidiaries. The financial statements of subsidiaries
are consolidated into the group’s financial statements. Intra-group balances and transactions
between group subsidiary companies are eliminated on consolidation.
Overseas subsidiariesAll subsidiaries are incorporated in New Zealand, except for:
—Vector Energy Solutions (Australia) Pty Limited, which is incorporated in Australia; and
—Vector Technology Solutions Holdings USA LLC and VTS USA LLC, which are both
incorporated in the United States of America.
Sale of subsidiariesOn 1 August 2025, the group sold its shares in E-Co Products Group Limited and its
subsidiary Cristal Air International Limited.
17. Investments continued
17.1 Investment in joint venture continued
Policies
A joint venture is where Vector shares joint control over an entity or group of entities and has
rights to the net assets of the arrangement. Investments in joint ventures are accounted for
using the equity method.
Bluecurrent
Vector’s interest in Bluecurrent consists of a 50% ownership of Bluecurrent Holdings NZ
Limited and Bluecurrent Holdings (Australia) Pty Limited respectively which is jointly
controlled with QIC Private Capital Pty Limited (QIC).
Vector has assessed that the contractual arrangement governing Bluecurrent meets the criteria
of a joint venture. Given the shares of Bluecurrent are stapled, disclosure has been consolidated.
Shareholder loansThe shareholder loans receivable from the joint venture are carried at amortised cost.
83
Notes to the financial statements
18. Income tax expense/(benefit)
Reconciliation of income tax expense/(benefit) – continuing operationsNOTE
2025
$M
2024
$M
Profit/(loss) before income tax – continuing operations241.2173.3
Tax at current rate of 28% 67.548.5
Current tax adjustments:
Share of net loss in joint ventures5.97.0
Fair value movements2.13.7
Impairment of goodwill10.416.8
Other1.20.3
(Over)/under provisions in prior periods(3.3)2.6
Deferred tax adjustments:
Buildings depreciation adjustment–20.5
(Over)/under provisions in prior periods2.7(1.7)
Income tax expense/(benefit) – continuing operations86.597.7
Comprising:
Current tax18.717.4
Deferred tax 1967.880.3
PoliciesIncome tax expense/(benefit) comprises current and deferred tax and is calculated using rates
enacted or substantively enacted at balance date.
Current and deferred tax is recognised in profit or loss unless the tax relates to items in
other comprehensive income, in which case the tax is recognised as an adjustment in other
comprehensive income against the item to which it relates.
Income tax assets are not discounted, in line with the economic substance of the balance.
Income tax assetThe current tax asset has accumulated from the prepayment of the group’s tax liability and
the group’s previous policy of paying fully imputed dividends. Vector expects to realise the
current tax asset through meeting obligations from future taxable profits. Vector has a legally
enforceable right to use the tax asset to offset current tax payable.
As at 30 June 2025, Vector recognised a current income tax asset of $19.6 million
(2024: $20.2 million) and a non-current income tax asset of $69.0 million (2024: $85.3 million).
Imputation creditsThere are no imputation credits available for use as at 30 June 2025 (2024: nil), as the
imputation account has a debit balance as of that date.
Pillar Two Model RulesVector is within the scope of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
(“OECD”) Pillar Two Model Rules (“Pillar Two”). Pillar Two legislation was enacted in
New Zealand, the jurisdiction in which Vector Limited was incorporated, from 1 July 2025.
For some entities within the group, such as subsidiaries in Australia, the Pillar Two rules came
into effect from 1 July 2024.
The group applies the exception to recognising and disclosing information about deferred
tax assets and liabilities related to Pillar Two income taxes, as provided in the amendments
to IAS 12 Income taxes issued in May 2023.
Under Pillar Two legislation, the group is liable to pay a top-up tax if the effective tax rate
(“ETR”) per jurisdiction is below the 15% minimum rate. The group has assessed its exposure
to the Pillar Two legislation in Australia and New Zealand. For the period ended 30 June 2025,
the group’s operations have satisfied the transitional safe harbour rules for all jurisdictions,
and therefore no top-up tax exposure arises in Australia or New Zealand.
Vector Annual Report 202584
Notes to the financial statements
19. Deferred tax
Deferred tax liability/(asset)
PPE AND
INTANGIBLES
$M
PROVISIONS
AND
ACCRUALS
$M
HEDGE
RESERVES
$M
ROU
ASSETS
$M
LEASE
LIABILITIES
$M
OTHER
$M
TOTAL
$M
Balance at 30 June 2023656.4(4.9)21.713.9(15.7)17.8689.2
Recognised in profit or
loss – continuing operations78.71.0––(0.7)1.380.3
Recognised in other
comprehensive income––(11.5)–––(11.5)
Deferred tax associated with
discontinued operations–2.1––––2.1
Balance at 30 June 2024735.1(1.8)10.213.9(16.4)19.1760.1
Recognised in profit or
loss – continuing operations70.4(3.1)–0.8(1.3)1.067.8
Recognised in other
comprehensive income––(14.5)–––(14.5)
Deferred tax associated with
discontinued operations(1.8)2.2–(3.1)3.3–0.6
Balance at 30 June 2025803.7(2.7)(4.3)11.6(14.4)20.1814.0
The group’s deferred tax position is presented in the balance sheet as follows:
2025
$M
2024
$M
Deferred tax asset(0.1)(2.1)
Deferred tax liability814.1762.2
Total814.0760.1
PoliciesDeferred tax is:
—Recognised on temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and
liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for taxation purposes.
—Not recognised for the initial recognition of goodwill.
—Measured at tax rates that are expected to be applied to the temporary differences when
they reverse
20. Trade and other payables
2025
$M
2024
$M
Current
Trade payables 169.4182.5
Employee benefits 17.318.1
Interest payable19.722.5
Balance at 30 June206.4223.1
Employee benefitsVector accrues employee benefits which remain unpaid or unused at balance date, and
amounts expected to be paid under short-term incentive plans.
85
Notes to the financial statements
21. Provisions
NOTE
DECOMMISSIONING
$M
PRODUCT
WARRANTY
$M
OTHER
$M
TOTAL
$M
Balance at 30 June 20247.10.71.69.4
Additions0.3–0.20.5
Impact of discounting100.4––0.4
Payments––(0.7)(0.7)
Reversed to profit or loss–(0.3)(0.6)(0.9)
Sale of discontinued operations(7.8)––(7.8)
Balance at 30 June 2025–0.40.50.9
Comprising:
Current–0.40.50.9
Non-current––––
PoliciesThe group recognises a provision when the group has a present obligation – legal or
constructive – as a result of a past event, it is more likely than not that the resulting liability will
be required to be settled, and the amount required to settle can be reliably estimated.
Decommissioning The decommissioning provisions represented the present value of the future expected
costs for dismantling the depot assets of Liquigas Limited situated at various regions in New
Zealand. Timing of economic outflows represented management’s best estimate of the end of
the useful life of the plant and associated assets.
On 31 January 2025, Vector completed the sale of the group’s 60.25% shareholding in Liquigas
Limited. The decommissioning provision was included in the disposal group. Refer to note 6
for further details.
Product warrantyThe group provides for restatement costs and warranty claims on products sold or installed.
Provisions are recognised when the product is sold, or the service is provided to the customer.
Initial recognition is based on historical experience and subsequently revisited at each
reporting date.
Other provisionsThese provisions comprise amounts that may be required to be utilised within one year or
a longer period dependent on ongoing negotiations with third parties involved. There are
currently no foreseeable uncertainties which would be reasonably expected to lead to material
changes in the amounts provided.
Vector Annual Report 202586
Notes to the financial statements
22. Fair values
NOTE
MATERIAL
OBSERVABLE
INPUTS
(LEVEL 2 INPUTS)
2025
$M
MATERIAL
UNOBSERVABLE
INPUTS
(LEVEL 3 INPUTS)
2025
$M
MATERIAL
OBSERVABLE
INPUTS
(LEVEL 2 INPUTS)
2024
$M
MATERIAL
UNOBSERVABLE
INPUTS
(LEVEL 3 INPUTS)
2024
$M
Assets measured at fair value
Derivative financial instruments2466.3–86.4–
Investment in private equity––0.5–
Contingent consideration12–28.1–42.3
Balance at 30 June66.328.186.942.3
Liabilities measured at fair value
Derivative financial instruments24(143.9)–166.2–
Balance at 30 June(143.9)–166.2–
PoliciesThe table above provides the fair value measurement hierarchy of the group’s assets and
liabilities that are measured at fair value.
The group estimates all fair values using the discounted cash flows method. All assets and
liabilities for which fair value is measured and disclosed in the financial statements are
categorised within the fair value hierarchy, described as follows:
Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities; or
Level 2: Inputs other than quoted prices included within level 1 that are observable for the
asset or liability, either directly (prices) or indirectly (derived from prices); or
Level 3: Inputs for the asset or liability that are not based on observable market data
(unobservable inputs).
Derivative financial
instruments
Fair value is calculated using the discounted cash flow method, estimated using observable
interest yield curves and/or foreign exchange market prices. The carrying values of the
financial instruments are the fair values excluding any interest receivable or payable, which is
separately presented in the balance sheet in other receivables or other payables.
Contingent considerationFair value is calculated using the discounted cash flow method. The group made assumptions
on unobservable inputs including, amongst others, future raw gas volume from the Kapuni
gas field, future LPG prices, future oil prices, foreign exchange rates, and an appropriate
discount rate. Further details on the inputs are as follows:
—Future raw gas volume from the Kapuni gas field is based on published forecasts from the
Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment;
—Future LPG prices are based on an independent financial institution’s commodity price
forecasts;
—Future oil prices are based on S&P Capital IQ forecast data;
—Future natural gas prices are based on an independent expert’s commodity price forecast;
—Future foreign exchange rates are based on an independent financial institution’s foreign
exchange rate forecasts; and
—Discount rate of 10.8% (2024: 11.0%), representing market discount rates as applicable to the
remaining life of the Kapuni gas field.
87
Notes to the financial statements
22. Fair values continued
Description of material
unobservable inputs
The table below summarises the material level 3 unobservable inputs used by the group in
measuring fair values and related sensitivity analyses.
2025
MATERIAL
UNOBSERVABLE INPUTS
RANGE AND
ESTIMATES
SENSITIVITY OF VALUATION TO CHANGES IN INPUTS
LOW
VALUATION
IMPACT
$MHIGH
VALUATION
IMPACT
$M
Contingent
consideration
Discount rate10.8%+1.0%-0.8+1.0%+0.9
Future raw gas volume98PJ-2PJ per
annum
-5.9+2PJ per
annum
+5.1
LPG pricing (long-term)US$490/
tonne
-US$50/
tonne
-2.1+US$50/
tonne
+2.1
Oil pricing (long-term)US$76/
barrel
-US$7/
barrel
-2.0+US$7/
barrel
+2.0
2024
MATERIAL
UNOBSERVABLE INPUTS
RANGE AND
ESTIMATES
SENSITIVITY OF VALUATION TO CHANGES IN INPUTS
LOW
VALUATION
IMPACT
$MHIGH
VALUATION
IMPACT
$M
Contingent
consideration
Discount rate11.0%-1.0%-1.3+1.0%+1.4
Future raw gas volume136PJ-2PJ per
annum
-7.3+2PJ per
annum
+6.7
LPG pricing (long-term)US$485/
tonne
-US$50/
tonne
-3.7+US$50/
tonne
+3.7
Oil pricing (long-term)US$83/
barrel
-US$7/
barrel
-2.6+US$7/
barrel
+2.6
Vector Annual Report 202588
Notes to the financial statements
23. Borrowings
2025CURRENCY
MATURITY
DATE
FACE
VALUE
$M
UNAMORTISED
COSTS
$M
FAIR VALUE
ADJUSTMENT
ON HEDGED
RISK
$M
CARRYING
VALUE
$M
FAIR VALUE
$M
Bank facilities – floating rateNZDJul 2026 –
Feb 2028
205.0(0.9)– 204.1205.1
Capital bonds – fixed rateNZD–307.2(0.8)– 306.4323.2
Wholesale bonds – fixed rateNZDOct 2026170.0(0.1)– 169.9166.2
Senior notes – fixed rateUSDOct 2027 –
Mar 2035
1,212.9(2.3)(66.1)1,144.51,208.8
Senior bonds – fixed rateNZDNov 2027225.0(0.3)(0.5)224.2225.8
Balance at 30 June2,120.1(4.4)(66.6)2,049.12,129.1
2024CURRENCY
MATURITY
DATE
FACE
VALUE
$M
UNAMORTISED
COSTS
$M
FAIR VALUE
ADJUSTMENT
ON HEDGED
RISK
$M
CARRYING
VALUE
$M
FAIR VALUE
$M
Bank facilities – floating rateNZDJul 2024 –
Jul 2026
–(0.3)–(0.3)–
Capital bonds – fixed rateNZD–307.2(1.1)–306.1316.5
Wholesale bonds – fixed rateNZDOct 2026170.0(0.1)–169.9157.0
Senior notes – fixed rateUSDOct 2027 –
Mar 2035
1,212.9(2.7)(118.7)1,091.51,159.7
Senior bonds – fixed rateNZDMay 2025 –
Nov 2027
475.0(1.0)(2.7)471.3460.3
Balance at 30 June2,165.1(5.2)(121.4)2,038.52,093.5
PoliciesBorrowings are initially recorded at fair value, net of transaction costs. After initial recognition,
borrowings are measured at amortised cost with any difference between the initial recognised
amount and the redemption value being recognised in interest costs in profit or loss over the
period of the borrowing using the effective interest rate method.
The carrying value of borrowings includes the principal converted at contract rates (face value),
unamortised costs and a fair value adjustment for the component of the risk that is hedged.
The fair value is calculated by discounting the future contractual cash flows at current market
interest rates that are available for similar financial instruments. The fair value of all borrowings,
calculated for disclosure purposes, are classified as level 2 on the fair value hierarchy.
89
Notes to the financial statements
23. Borrowings continued
Bank facilitiesNew floating rate bank facilities were added as part of our debt management activities.
Capital bondsCapital bonds of $307.2 million are perpetual subordinated bonds with the next election
date set as 15 June 2027. The interest rate was fixed at 6.23% at the previous election date of
15 June 2022.
Wholesale bondsWholesale bonds of $170.0 million with a fixed rate of 1.575% maturing in October 2026.
Senior bondsSenior bonds of $225.0 million with a fixed rate of 3.69% maturing in November 2027.
In May 2025, the group repaid $250.0 million of senior bonds.
Senior notesThe tranches of USD denominated senior notes and the corresponding NZD values are
shown below:
Date issuedNZ $MUS $MDate of Maturity
March 2020
573.9360.0October 2032
223.2140.0October 2035
October 2017
277.2200.0October 2027
138.6100.0October 2029
CovenantsAll borrowings are unsecured and are subject to negative pledge arrangements.
Under the terms of its borrowing arrangements, the group is subject to various lending
covenants. The key covenants include interest coverage and debt to equity gearing. The group
was in compliance with all covenant requirements for the years ended 30 June 2025 and
30 June 2024.
Vector Annual Report 202590
Notes to the financial statements
24. Derivatives and hedge accounting
CASH FLOW HEDGESFAIR VALUE HEDGESCOST OF HEDGINGTOTAL
2025
$M
2024
$M
2025
$M
2024
$M
2025
$M
2024
$M
2025
$M
2024
$M
Derivative assets
Cross currency swaps–– 57.239.6(3.0)(4.0)54.235.6
Interest rate swaps11.950.7––––11.950.7
Forward exchange contracts0.20.1––––0.20.1
Total 12.150.857.239.6(3.0)(4.0)66.386.4
Derivative liabilities
Cross currency swaps27.130.7(146.8)(183.1)(9.3)(8.6)(129.0)(161.0)
Interest rate swaps(14.1)(2.0)(0.5)(2.7)––(14.6)(4.7)
Forward exchange contracts(0.3)(0.5)––––(0.3)(0.5)
Total 12.728.2(147.3)(185.8)(9.3)(8.6)(143.9)(166.2)
Key observable market data for fair value measurement
20252024
Foreign currency exchange (FX) rates as at 30 June
NZD-USD FX rate0.60960.6086
Interest rate swap rates
NZD3.16% to 4.08%4.44% to 5.63%
USD3.40% to 4.33%3.96% to 5.33%
Sensitivity to changes
in market rates
The graphs below illustrate the impact on derivative valuations of possible changes in interest
rates and foreign exchange rates, assuming all other variables are held constant.
Impact on comprehensive income
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
interest rates (-%/+%)
interest rates (-%/+%)
foreign exchange rates (-%/+%)
foreign exchange rates (-%/+%)
Rate increaseRate decrease
Impact on profit or loss
interest rates (-%/+%)
interest rates (-%/+%)
foreign exchange rates (-%/+%)
foreign exchange rates (-%/+%)
Rate increaseRate decrease
.
..
.
.
.
.
.
91
Notes to the financial statements
24. Derivatives and hedge
accounting continued
PoliciesVector initially recognises derivatives at fair value on the date the derivative contract is entered
into, and subsequently they are re-measured to their fair value at each balance date. All
derivatives are classified as level 2 on the fair value hierarchy explained in note 22.
Vector designates certain derivatives as either:
—Fair value hedges (of the fair value of recognised assets or liabilities or firm commitments); or
—Cash flow hedges (of highly probable forecast transactions).
At inception each transaction is documented, detailing:
—The economic relationship and the hedge ratio between hedging instruments and hedged
items;
—The risk management objectives and strategy for undertaking the hedge transaction; and
—The assessment (initially and on an ongoing basis) of whether the derivatives that are used
in the hedging transaction are highly effective in offsetting changes in fair values or cash
flows of hedged items.
The underlying risk of the derivative contracts is identical to the hedged risk component (i.e.
the interest rate risk and the foreign exchange risk) therefore the group has established a one-
to-one hedge ratio. Effectiveness is assessed by comparing the changes of the hedged items
and hedging instruments.
Hedge accounting is discontinued when the hedge instrument expires or is sold, terminated,
exercised, or no longer qualifies for hedge accounting.
Fair value hedgesVector has entered into cross currency interest rate swaps and interest rate swaps (the
hedging instruments) to hedge the interest rate risk and foreign currency risk (the hedged
risk) arising in relation to its USD senior notes and NZD senior bonds (the hedged items). These
transactions have been designated into fair value hedges.
The following are recognised in profit or loss:
—The change in fair value of the hedging instruments; and
—The change in fair value of the underlying hedged items attributable to the hedged risk.
Once hedging is discontinued, the fair value adjustment to the carrying amount of the hedged
item arising from the hedged risk is amortised through profit or loss from that date through to
maturity of the hedged item.
Cash flow hedgesVector has entered into interest rate swaps and cross currency interest rate swaps (the
hedging instruments) to hedge the variability in cash flows arising from interest rate and
foreign currency exchange rate movements in relation to its NZD floating rate notes and
USD senior notes.
The effective portion of changes in the fair value of the hedging instruments are recognised in
other comprehensive income.
The following are recognised in profit or loss:
—any gain or loss relating to the ineffective portion of the hedging instrument; and
—fair value changes in the hedging instrument previously accumulated in other
comprehensive income, in the periods when the hedged item is recognised in profit or loss.
Once hedging is discontinued, any cumulative gain or loss previously recognised in other
comprehensive income is recognised in profit or loss either:
—at the same time as the forecast transaction; or
—immediately if the transaction is no longer expected to occur.
Market rate sensitivityAll derivatives are measured at fair value. A change in the market data used to determine fair
value will have an impact on Vector’s financial statements.
The graphs on the previous page show the sensitivity of the financial statements to a range of
possible changes in market data at balance date.
Vector Annual Report 202592
Notes to the financial statements
24. Derivatives and hedge
accounting continued
2025
$M
2024
$M
DERIVATIVES
POSITION AS PER
BALANCE SHEET
AMOUNT AFTER
APPLYING RIGHTS
OF OFFSET UNDER
ISDA AGREEMENTS
DERIVATIVES
POSITION AS PER
BALANCE SHEET
AMOUNT AFTER
APPLYING RIGHTS
OF OFFSET UNDER
ISDA AGREEMENTS
Derivative assets66.312.486.428.6
Derivative liabilities (143.9)(90.0)(166.2)(108.4)
Net amount(77.6)(77.6)(79.8)(79.8)
Rights to offsetVector enters into derivative transactions under International Swaps and Derivatives
Association (ISDA) master agreements. The ISDA agreements do not meet the criteria for
offsetting in the balance sheet for accounting purposes. This is because Vector does not
have any currently legally enforceable right to offset recognised amounts. Under the ISDA
agreements the right to offset is enforceable only on the occurrence of future events such as
a default on the bank loans or other credit events. The potential net impact of this offsetting
is disclosed in column ‘amount after applying rights of offset under ISDA agreements. Vector
does not hold and is not required to post collateral against its derivative positions.
93
Notes to the financial statements
24. Derivatives and hedge
accounting continued
24.1 Effects of hedge accounting on the financial position and performance
The tables below demonstrate the impact of hedged items and the hedging instruments designated in hedging relationships:
—The NZD floating rate exposure includes $1,030.0 million arising from hedging the USD senior bonds (2024: $910.0 million) as
allowable under NZ IFRS 9 Financial Instruments;
—The fixed rate interest rate swaps include $695.0 million of forward starting swaps (2024: $410.0 million).
2025
FACE
VALUE
$M
WEIGHTED
AVERAGE
RATE
ACCUMU-
LATED FAIR
VALUE
HEDGE
ADJUST-
MENTS
$M
CARRYING
AMOUNT
ASSETS/
(LIABILITIES)
$M
CHANGE IN
FAIR VALUE
USED FOR
MEASURING
INEFFECTIVE-
NESS –
CASHFLOW
HEDGE
$M
CHANGE IN
FAIR VALUE
USED FOR
MEASURING
INEFFECTIVE-
NESS – FAIR
VALUE
HEDGE
$M
HEDGING
(GAIN)
OR LOSS
RECOGNISED
IN CASH
FLOW HEDGE
RESERVE
$M
(GAIN)
OR LOSS
RECOGNISED
IN COST OF
HEDGING
$M
Cash flow hedge – Interest risk
Hedged item:
NZD floating
rate exposure on
borrowings(1,235.0) – – (2.3)– – –
Hedging instrument:
Fixed rate interest
rate swaps(1,930.0)3.0%–(2.3)(2.3)– 50.9–
Cash flow and fair value hedge – Interest and exchange risks
Hedged item: USD
fixed rate exposure
on borrowings (1,212.9) – (1,144.4)22.5(54.0)– –
Hedging instrument:
Cross currency swaps (1,212.9)floating66.1(74.8)27.154.01.60.2
Fair value hedge – Interest risk
Hedged item: NZD
fixed rate exposure
on borrowings(50.0) 0.5–– (2.2)– –
Hedging instrument:
Interest rate swap(50.0)floating– (0.5)– 2.2– –
Ineffectiveness4.6–
Vector Annual Report 202594
Notes to the financial statements
24. Derivatives and hedge
accounting continued
24.1 Effects of hedge accounting on the financial position and performance continued
2024
FACE
VALUE
$M
WEIGHTED
AVERAGE
RATE
ACCUMU-
LATED FAIR
VALUE
HEDGE
ADJUST-
MENTS
$M
CARRYING
AMOUNT
ASSETS/
(LIABILITIES)
$M
CHANGE IN
FAIR VALUE
USED FOR
MEASURING
INEFFECTIVE-
NESS –
CASHFLOW
HEDGE
$M
CHANGE IN
FAIR VALUE
USED FOR
MEASURING
INEFFECTIVE-
NESS – FAIR
VALUE
HEDGE
$M
HEDGING
(GAIN)
OR LOSS
RECOGNISED
IN CASH
FLOW HEDGE
RESERVE
$M
(GAIN)
OR LOSS
RECOGNISED
IN COST OF
HEDGING
$M
Cash flow hedge – Interest risk
Hedged item:
NZD floating
rate exposure on
borrowings(910.0) – – 48.7– – –
Hedging instrument:
Fixed rate Interest
rate swaps(1,320.0)2.5%– 48.748.7–35.1–
Cash flow and fair value hedge – Interest and exchange risks
Hedged item: USD
fixed rate exposure
on borrowings (1,212.9) – (1,091.5)25.4(2.1)– –
Hedging instrument:
Cross currency swaps (1,212.9)floating118.7(125.4)30.72.9(0.6)(6.6)
Fair value hedge – Interest risk
Hedged item: NZD
fixed rate exposure
on borrowing(50.0) 2.7–– (1.0)––
Hedging instrument:
Interest rate swap(50.0)floating– (2.7)– 1.0––
Ineffectiveness5.30.8
Hedging instruments and hedged items are included in the line items “Derivatives” and “Borrowings” respectively in the
balance sheet. The source of ineffectiveness is largely due to counterparty credit risk on the derivative instruments. Hedge
ineffectiveness is included in the “Fair value change on financial instruments” in the profit or loss. Please refer to the asset and
liability positions of the hedging instruments in Note 24 derivatives and hedge accounting table above.
24.2 Fair value changes on
financial instruments
NOTE
2025
$M
2024
$M
Recognised in profit or loss
Fair value movement on hedging instruments 56.23.9
Fair value movement on hedged items(56.2)(3.1)
Ineffectiveness from cash flow hedge relationships(0.7)0.4
Fair value change on contingent consideration12(7.8)(13.2)
Total gains/(losses)(8.5)(12.0)
95
Notes to the financial statements
24. Derivatives and hedge
accounting continued
24.3 Reconciliation of
changes in hedge reserves
Hedge reserves
2025
CASHFLOW
HEDGE
RESERVE
$M
COST OF
HEDGING
$M
TOTAL
$M
Opening balance(35.3)9.1(26.2)
Hedging gains or losses recognised in OCI –
Interest rate swaps24.5–24.5
Hedging gains or losses recognised in OCI –
Cross currency swaps41.7(0.2)41.5
Hedging gains or losses recognised in OCI –
Forward exchange contracts (0.2)–(0.2)
Transferred to profit or loss – Interest rate swaps26.4–26.4
Transferred to profit or loss – Cross currency swaps(40.1)–(40.1)
Recognised as basis adjustment to non-financial
assets(0.2)–(0.2)
Deferred tax on change in reserves(14.6)0.1(14.5)
Closing balance2.29.011.2
Hedge reserves
2024
CASH FLOW
HEDGE
RESERVE
$M
COST OF
HEDGING
$M
TOTAL
$M
Opening balance(60.0)4.3(55.7)
Hedging gains or losses recognised in OCI –
Interest rate swaps(6.3)–(6.3)
Hedging gains or losses recognised in OCI –
Cross currency swaps38.66.645.2
Hedging gains or losses recognised in OCI –
Forward exchange contracts 0.4–0.4
Transferred to profit or loss – Interest rate swaps41.5–41.5
Transferred to profit or loss – Cross currency swaps(39.1)–(39.1)
Recognised as basis adjustment to non-financial
assets(0.7)–(0.7)
Deferred tax on change in reserves(9.7)(1.8)(11.5)
Closing balance(35.3)9.1(26.2)
Vector Annual Report 202596
Notes to the financial statements
25. Financial risk management
Risk management frameworkVector has a comprehensive treasury policy, approved by the board, to manage financial risks
arising from business activity. The policy outlines the objectives and approach that the group
applies to manage:
—Interest rate risk;
—Credit risk;
—Liquidity risk;
—Foreign exchange risk; and
—Funding risk.
For each risk type, any position outside the policy limits requires the prior approval of the
board. Each risk is monitored on a regular basis and reported to the board.
25.1 Interest rate risk
Interest rate exposure
2025
< 1 YEAR
$M
1 - 2 YEARS
$M
2 - 5 YEARS
$M
> 5 YEARS
$M
TOTAL
$M
Interest rate exposure: borrowings205.0477.2640.8797.12,120.1
Derivative contracts:
Interest rate swaps(1,160.0)10.0840.0310.0–
Cross currency swaps1,212.9–(415.8)(797.1)–
Net interest rate exposure257.9487.21,065.0310.02,120.1
Interest rate exposure
2024
< 1 YEAR
$M
1 - 2 YEARS
$M
2 - 5 YEARS
$M
> 5 YEARS
$M
TOTAL
$M
Interest rate exposure: borrowings250.0–979.4935.72,165.1
Derivative contracts:
Interest rate swaps(850.0)300.0170.0380.0–
Cross currency swaps1,212.9–(277.2)(935.7)–
Net interest rate exposure612.9300.0872.2380.02,165.1
PoliciesVector is exposed to interest rate risk through its borrowing activities.
Interest rate exposures are managed primarily by entering into derivative contracts. The
main objectives are to minimise the cost of total borrowings, control variations in the interest
expense of the borrowings from year to year, and where practicable to match the interest rate
risk profile of the borrowings with the risk profile of the group’s assets.
The board has set and actively monitors maximum and minimum limits for the net interest
rate exposure profile.
25.2 Credit risk
PoliciesCredit risk represents the risk of cash flow losses arising from counterparty defaults. Vector is
exposed to credit risk in the normal course of business from:
—Trade receivable transactions with business and mass market residential customers; and
—Financial instruments transactions with financial institutions.
The carrying amounts of financial assets represent the group’s maximum exposure to credit
risk.
The group has credit policies in place to minimise the impact of exposure to credit risk and
associated financial losses:
—The board must approve placement of cash, short-term cash deposits or derivatives with
financial institutions whose credit rating is less than A+. As at 30 June 2025, all financial
instruments are held with financial institutions with credit rating above A+;
—The board sets limits and monitors exposure to financial institutions; and
—Exposure is spread across a range of financial institutions. Where we deem there is credit
exposure to energy retailers and customers, the group minimises its risk by performing
credit evaluations and/or requiring a bond or other form of security.
97
Notes to the financial statements
25. Financial risk management
continued
25.3 Liquidity risk
Contractual cash flows maturity profile
2025
PAYABLE
<1 YEAR
$M
PAYABLE
1–2 YEARS
$M
PAYABLE
2–5 YEARS
$M
PAYABLE
>5 YEARS
$M
TOTAL
CONTRACTUAL
CASH FLOWS
$M
Non-derivative financial liabilities
Trade payables169.4–––169.4
Contract liabilities0.71.6––2.3
Lease liabilities9.010.219.029.667.8
Borrowings: interest71.368.090.262.6292.1
Borrowings: principal205.0477.2717.1820.22,219.5
Derivative financial (assets)/liabilities
Cross currency swaps: inflow(39.2)(39.1)(578.2)(882.9)(1,539.4)
Cross currency swaps: outflow62.162.3581.0931.91,637.3
Forward exchange contracts: inflow(14.8)(1.0)(0.3)–(16.1)
Forward exchange contracts: outflow14.81.10.3–16.2
Net settled derivatives
Interest rate swaps (4.4)2.84.8(0.3)2.9
Group contractual cash flows473.9583.1833.9961.12,852.0
Contractual cash flows maturity profile
2024
PAYABLE
<1 YEAR
$M
PAYABLE
1-2 YEARS
$M
PAYABLE
2-5 YEARS
$M
PAYABLE
>5 YEARS
$M
TOTAL
CONTRACTUAL
CASH FLOWS
$M
Non-derivative financial liabilities
Trade payables182.5–––182.5
Contract liabilities2.23.51.1–6.8
Lease liabilities11.113.322.547.694.5
Borrowings: interest77.969.4133.587.6368.4
Borrowings: principal250.0–1,030.8985.92,266.7
Derivative financial (assets)/liabilities
Cross currency swaps: inflow(39.4)(39.3)(429.2)(1,073.5)(1,581.4)
Cross currency swaps: outflow89.579.1471.31,126.61,766.5
Forward exchange contracts: inflow(16.2)–––(16.2)
Forward exchange contracts: outflow16.7–––16.7
Net settled derivatives
Interest rate swaps (29.6)(17.5)(4.9)(0.6)(52.6)
Group contractual cash flows544.7108.51,225.11,173.63,051.9
Contractual cash flowsThe above table shows the timing of non-discounted cash flows for all financial instrument
liabilities and derivatives.
The cash flows for bank facilities, included in borrowings, are disclosed on the basis of their
contractual repayment terms for the individual drawdowns.
The cash flows for capital bonds, included in borrowings, are disclosed as payable within 1-2
years as the next election date set for the capital bonds is 15 June 2027 (2024: 2-5 years) and
the bonds have no contractual maturity date.
Vector Annual Report 202598
Notes to the financial statements
25. Financial risk management
continued
25.3 Liquidity risk continued
PoliciesVector is exposed to liquidity risk where there is a risk that the group may encounter difficulty
in meeting its day to day obligations due to the timing of cash receipts and payments.
The objective is to ensure that adequate liquid assets and funding sources are available at all
times to meet both short-term and long-term commitments. The board has set a minimum
headroom requirement for committed facilities over Vector’s anticipated 18-month peak
borrowing requirement.
At balance date, Vector has access to undrawn funds of $435.0 million (2024: $575.0 million).
25.4 Foreign exchange risk
PoliciesVector is exposed to foreign exchange risk through its borrowing activities, and foreign
currency denominated expenditure.
Foreign exchange exposure is primarily managed through entering into derivative contracts.
The board requires that all material foreign currency borrowings and expenditure are hedged
into NZD at the time of commitment to drawdown or when the exposure is highly probable.
Hence, at balance date there is no material exposure to foreign currency risk.
25.5 Funding risk
PoliciesFunding risk is the risk that Vector will have difficulty refinancing or raising new debt on
comparable terms to existing facilities. The objective is to spread the concentration of risk so
that if an event occurs the overall cost of funding is not unnecessarily increased. Details of
borrowings are shown in note 23.
The board has set the maximum amount of debt that may mature in any one financial year.
99
Notes to the financial statements
26. Cash flows
26.1 Reconciliation of net profit/
(loss) to net cash flows from/
(used in) operating activities
Reconciliation of net profit/(loss) to net cash
flows from/(used in) operating activities including
discontinued operations
NOTE
2025
$M
2024
$M
Net profit/(loss) for the period167.791.0
Items not associated with operating activities:
Gain on sale of discontinued operations classified as
investing activities(3.9)–
Cost to sell of discontinued operations (1.4)–
Contingent consideration associated with investing
activities12(10.8)(11.4)
PPE items associated with investing activities 8.6(4.7)
Movements in emission units associated with investing
activities(7.4)0.8
Lease liabilities items associated with financing
activities(0.4)(0.3)
(15.3)(15.6)
Non-cash items:
Depreciation and amortisation233.0230.8
Non-cash portion of interest costs (net)(1.4)(17.0)
Fair value change on financial instruments24.28.512.0
Share of net profit/(loss) in joint ventures21.124.9
Impairment of assets and goodwill37.060.6
Increase/(decrease) in deferred tax 68.482.4
Non-cash movements in provisions–0.3
Other non-cash items(1.3)(1.0)
365.3393.0
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Trade and other payables (16.7)(46.2)
Provisions(8.5)(17.1)
Contract liabilities(22.3)(3.0)
Contract assets11.8(12.4)
Inventories14.9(5.3)
Trade and other receivables2.142.7
Income tax 16.218.0
(2.5)(23.3)
Net cash flows from/(used in) operating activities
including discontinued operations515.2445.1
Vector Annual Report 2025100
Notes to the financial statements
26. Cash flows continued
26.2 Reconciliation of
movement of liabilities to cash
flows arising from financing
activities
Reconciliation of movement of
liabilities to cash flows arising
from financing activities
LEASE
LIABILITIESBORROWINGSDERIVATIVESTOTAL
Balance at 1 July 202468.12,038.579.82,186.4
Net repayments–(45.0)–(45.0)
Lease liabilities payments(8.4)––(8.4)
Financing cash flows(8.4)(45.0)–(53.4)
Fair value changes–54.9(2.2)52.7
Borrowing fees paid–(3.7)–(3.7)
Amortisation of borrowing costs–4.4–4.4
ROU asset additions3.8––3.8
ROU asset disposals(12.5)––(12.5)
Other0.5––0.5
As at 30 June 202551.52,049.177.62,178.2
27. Equity
27.1 Share Capital
SharesThe total number of authorised and issued shares is 1,000,000,000 (2024: 1,000,000,000).
All ordinary issued shares are fully paid, have no par value and carry equal voting rights and
equal rights to a surplus on winding up of the parent.
At balance date 26,343 shares (2024: 26,343) are allocated to the employee share purchase
scheme.
27.2 Capital Management
PoliciesVector’s objectives in managing capital are:
—To safeguard the ability of entities within the group to continue as a going concern;
—To provide an adequate return to shareholders by pricing products and services
commensurate with the level of risk; and
—Maintain an investment grade credit rating
Vector manages and may adjust its capital structure in light of changes in economic conditions
and for the risk characteristics of the underlying assets. To achieve this Vector may:
—Adjust its dividend policy;
—Return capital to shareholders; or
—Sell assets to reduce debt.
101
Notes to the financial statements
27. Equity continued
27.3 Financial ratios
Basic and diluted earnings per share
2025
$M
2024
$M
Net profit from continuing operations attributable to
owners of the parent 154.775.6
Net profit from discontinued operation attributable to
owners of the parent 11.813.0
Net profit attributable to owners of the parent166.588.6
Weighted average ordinary shares outstanding during the
period (number of shares)999,973,657999,973,657
Earnings per share from continuing operations15.5 cents7.6 cents
Earnings per share from discontinued operations1.2 cents1.3 cents
Total earnings per share16.7 cents8.9 cents
Net tangible assets per share
2025
$M
2024
$M
Net assets attributable to owners of the parent 3,600.93,761.5
Less total intangible assets (1,051.9)(1,139.7)
Total net tangible assets2,549.02,621.8
Ordinary shares outstanding (number of shares)999,973,657999,973,657
Net tangible assets per share254.9 cents262.2 cents
Economic net debt to economic net debt plus adjusted
equity ratio (“gearing ratio”)
2025
$M
2024
$M
Face value of borrowings2,120.12,165.1
Lease liabilities51.568.1
Less cash and cash equivalents and deposits(23.3)(104.6)
Economic net debt2,148.32,128.6
Total equity3,600.93,776.7
Adjusted for hedge reserves11.2(26.2)
Adjusted equity 3,612.13,750.5
Economic net debt plus adjusted equity 5,760.55,879.1
Gearing ratio37.3%36.2%
Economic net debtEconomic net debt is defined as ‘face value of borrowings and lease liabilities, less cash and
cash equivalents and deposits’.
27.4 Reserves
Hedge reservesHedge reserves comprise the cash flow hedge reserve and cost of hedging.
The cash flow hedge reserve records the effective portion of changes in the fair value of
derivatives that are designated as cash flow hedges.
The gain or loss relating to the ineffective portion is recorded in profit or loss within interest
costs (net).
During the year, a $13.7 million gain (2024: $2.4 million loss) was transferred from the cash flow
hedge reserve to interest expense.
Cost of hedging records the change in the fair value of the cost to convert foreign currency
into New Zealand dollars as required under NZ IFRS 9.
Other reservesOther reserves comprise:
—A share-based payment reserve relating to the employee share purchase scheme. When
shares are vested to the employee, the reserve is offset with a reduction in treasury shares.
—A foreign currency translation reserve to record exchange differences arising from the
translation of the group’s foreign operations.
—A reserve to record the fair value movements in the group’s investments in financial assets.
Vector Annual Report 2025102
Notes to the financial statements
28. Related party transactions
Related partiesRelated parties of the group are:
—Entrust, the group’s ultimate parent entity;
—Bluecurrent, made up of the consolidated groups of Bluecurrent NZ Holdings Limited and
Bluecurrent Holdings (Australia) Pty Limited; and
—Key management personnel, including the group’s directors and the executive team.
Transactions with related parties
2025
$M
2024
$M
Transactions with Entrust
Dividends paid 200.9174.6
Distribution to customers–10.8
Transactions with Bluecurrent
Interest from shareholder loans12.515.4
Provision of metering data services7.45.1
Provision of transitional services6.58.3
Transactions with key management personnel
Salary and other short-term employee benefits8.17.2
Directors’ fees0.91.2
Advances to related parties
2025
$M
2024
$M
Shareholder loans to Bluecurrent
Balance at start of period208.9229.0
Interest capitalised16.011.9
Repayments(51.8)(30.6)
Effect of changes in exchange rates(1.9)(1.4)
Balance at end of period171.2208.9
29. Contingent liabilities
DisclosuresThe directors are aware of claims that have been made against entities of the group and,
where appropriate, have recognised provisions for these within note 21.
No material contingent liabilities have been identified.
30. Events after balance date
Sale of subsidiaryOn 1 August 2025, Vector entered an agreement to sell E-Co Products Group Limited and its
subsidiaries, for $2.5 million. The transaction completed on 1 August 2025. No adjustment is
required to these financial statements in respect of this event.
ApprovalThe financial statements were approved by the board on 22 August 2025.
Final dividendOn 22 August 2025, the board declared a final unimputed dividend for the year ended 30
June 2025 of 13.00 cents per share. No adjustment is required to these financial statements in
respect of this event.
103
Notes to the financial statements
© 2025 KPMG, a New Zealand Partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organization of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited,
a private English company limited by guarantee. All rights reserved.
Document classification: KPMG Public
Independent Auditor’s Report
To the shareholders of Vector Limited
Report on the audit of the consolidated financial statements
Opinion
We have audited the accompanying consolidated
financial statements which comprise:
the consolidated balance sheet as at 30 June
2025;
the consolidated statements of profit or loss, other
comprehensive income, changes in equity and
cash flows for the year then ended; and
notes, including material accounting policy
information and other explanatory information.
In our opinion, the accompanying Company and
banking group consolidated financial statements
of Vector Limited (the Company) and its
subsidiaries (the Group) on pages 58 to 103
presents fairly in all material respects:
the Group’s financial position as at 30 June
2025 and its financial performance and cash
flows for the year ended on that date;
in accordance with New Zealand
Equivalents to International Financial
Reporting Standards (NZ IFRS) issued by
the New Zealand Accounting Standards
Board and the International Financial
Reporting Standards issued by the
International Accounting Standards Board.
Basis for opinion
We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (New Zealand) (ISAs (NZ)). We
believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.
We are independent of Vector Limited in accordance with Professional and Ethical Standard 1 International Code
of Ethics for Assurance Practitioners (Including International Independence Standards) (New Zealand) issued by
the New Zealand Auditing and Assurance Standards Board and the International Ethics Standards Board for
Accountants’ International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (including International Independence
Standards) (IESBA Code), as applicable to audits of financial statements of public interest entities. We have also
fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with Professional and Ethical Standard 1 and the IESBA
Code.
Our responsibilities under ISAs (NZ) are further described in the Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the
consolidated financial statements section of our report.
Our firm has provided other services to the Group in relation to the review of interim financial statements,
regulatory assurance over climate related disclosures and other assurance and agreed upon procedures
engagements, compliance services in relation to R&D tax credits and providing a whistleblower hotline. Subject
to certain restrictions, partners and employees of our firm may also deal with the Group on normal terms within
the ordinary course of trading activities of the business of the Group. These matters have not impaired our
independence as auditor of the Group. The firm has no other relationship with, or interest in, the Group.
© 2025 KPMG, a New Zealand Partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organization of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited,
a private English company limited by guarantee. All rights reserved.
Document classification:KPMG Public
Independent Auditor’s Report
To the shareholders of Vector Limited
Report on the audit of the consolidated financial statements
Opinion
We have audited the accompanying consolidated
financial statements which comprise:
the consolidatedbalance sheet as at 30 June
2025;
the consolidatedstatements of profit or loss, other
comprehensive income, changes in equity and
cash flows for the year then ended; and
notes, including material accounting policy
information and other explanatory information.
In our opinion, the accompanying Company and
banking group consolidated financial statements
of Vector Limited (the Company) and its
subsidiaries (the Group) on pages 58 to 103
presents fairlyin all material respects:
the Group’s financial position as at 30 June
2025 and its financial performance and cash
flows for the year ended on that date;
in accordance with New Zealand
Equivalents to International Financial
Reporting Standards(NZ IFRS) issued by
the New Zealand Accounting Standards
Board and the International Financial
Reporting Standards issued by the
International Accounting Standards Board.
Basis for opinion
We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (New Zealand) (ISAs (NZ)). We
believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.
We are independent of Vector Limited in accordance with Professional and Ethical Standard 1 International Code
of Ethics for Assurance Practitioners (Including International Independence Standards) (New Zealand) issued by
the New Zealand Auditing and Assurance Standards Board and the International Ethics Standards Board for
Accountants’ International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (including International Independence
Standards) (IESBA Code), as applicable to audits of financial statements of public interest entities. We have also
fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with Professional and Ethical Standard 1 and the IESBA
Code.
Our responsibilities under ISAs (NZ) are further described in the Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the
consolidated financial statements section of our report.
Our firm has provided other services to the Group in relation to the review of interim financial statements,
regulatory assurance over climate related disclosures and other assurance and agreed upon procedures
engagements, compliance services in relation to R&D tax credits and providing a whistleblower hotline. Subject
to certain restrictions, partners and employees of our firm may also deal with theGroup on normal terms within
the ordinary course of trading activities of the business of the Group. These matters have not impaired our
independence as auditor of theGroup. The firm has no other relationship with, or interest in, theGroup.
© 2024 KPMG, a New Zealand Partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organization of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a
private English company limited by guarantee. All rights reserved.
Document classification: KPMG Public
Independent Auditor’s Report
To the shareholdersof Vector Limited
Report on the audit of theconsolidatedfinancial statements
Opinion
In our opinion, the accompanying consolidatedfinancial
statements of Vector Limited (the Company) and its
subsidiaries (the Group) on pages 57 to 101 present
fairlyin all material respects:
-the Group’s financial position as at 30 June
2024 and its financial performance and cash
flows for the yearended on that date;and
-In accordance withNew Zealand Equivalents to
International Financial Reporting Standards(NZ
IFRS) issued by the New Zealand Accounting
Standards Board and the International Financial
Reporting Standards issued by the International
Accounting Standards Board.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated
financial statements which comprise:
- the consolidatedbalance sheet as at 30 June
2024;
-the consolidatedprofit or loss, statements of
other comprehensive income, changes in
equity and cash flows for the year then ended;
-notes, includingmaterial accounting policy
information and other explanatory information
Basis for opinion
W
e conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (New Zealand) (ISAs (NZ)). We
believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.
We are independent of Vector Limited in accordance with Professional and Ethical Standard 1 International Code
of Ethics for Assurance Practitioners (Including International Independence Standards) (New Zealand) issued by
the New Zealand Auditing and Assurance Standards Board and the International Ethics Standards Board for
Accountants’ International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (including International Independence
Standards) (IESBA Code), and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these
requirements and the IESBA Code.
Our responsibilities under ISAs (NZ) are further described in the Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the
consolidatedfinancial statements section of our report.
Our firm has provided other services to the Group in relation to the regulatory assurance services, other
assurance services, pre-assurance on climate related disclosures and compliance services in relation to R&D tax
credits. Subject to certain restrictions, partners and employees of our firm may also deal with theGroup on
normal terms within the ordinary course of trading activities of the business of the Group. These matters have not
impaired our independence as auditor of theGroup. The firm has no other relationship with, or interest in, the
Group.
Materiality
The scope of our audit was influenced by our application of materiality. Materiality helped us to determine the
nature, timing and extent of our audit procedures and to evaluate the effect of misstatements, both individually
and on theconsolidated financial statements as a whole. The materiality for the consolidated financial statements
as a whole was set at $11.3mdetermined with reference to a benchmark of the Group’s profit before tax. We
chose the benchmark because, in our view, this is a key measure of the Group’s performance.
Vector Annual Report 2025104
Materiality
The scope of our audit was influenced by our application of materiality. Materiality helped us to determine the
nature, timing and extent of our audit procedures and to evaluate the effect of misstatements, both individually
and on the consolidated financial statements as a whole. The materiality for the consolidated financial statements
as a whole was set at $12 million determined with reference to a benchmark of the Group’s profit before tax. We
chose the benchmark because, in our view, this is a key measure of the Group’s performance.
Key audit matters
Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgement, were of most significance in our audit of
the consolidated financial statements in the current period. We summarise below those matters and our key audit
procedures to address those matters in order that the shareholders as a body may better understand the process
by which we arrived at our audit opinion.
Our procedures were undertaken in the context of and solely for the purpose of our audit opinion on the
consolidated financial statements as a whole and we do not express discrete opinions on separate elements of
the consolidated financial statements.
The key audit matter How the matter was addressed in
our audit
Capitalisation and asset lives (Property, plant and equipment of $4,807.9 million, Software of $58.2
million, with additions during the year of $476.2 million).
Refer to Notes 14 and 15 of the financial statements.
Capitalisation of costs and useful lives assigned to
these assets are a key audit matter due to the
significance of property, plant and equipment and
software to the group’s business, and due to the
judgement involved in determining the carrying
value of these assets, principally:
•the decision to capitalise or expense costs
relating to the electricity and gas distributi
on
net
works. This decision depends on whether
the expenditure is considered to enhance th
e
net
work (and is therefore capital), or t
o
m
aintain the current operating capability of t
he
net
work (and is therefore an expense). Ther
e
i
s also judgement when estimating the extent
of recovering internal salary costs, particularly
within digital projects;
and
•the estimation of the useful life of the asset
once the costs are capitalised. Estimated lives
range between 2 and 70 years, resulting from
the diversity of property, plant and equipment
and software assets across a portfolio of
businesses. There is also judgement when
estimating asset lives due to the uncertainty of
the impact of technological change.
Our audit procedures in this area included, among
others:
•examining the operating effectiveness of controls
related to the approval of capital projects;
•assessing the nature of capitalised costs by
checking a sample of costs to invoice to determine
whether the description of the expenditure met t
he
c
apitalisation criteria in the relevant accounti
ng
s
tandards;
•assessing the useful lives stated in the accounting
pol
icies of the group by comparing to industry
benchmarks and our knowledge of the business and
its operations; and
•assessing whether the useful lives of each individual
asset capitalised in the current period was within the
stated policies.
We found no material errors in the nature and amount
capitalised in the period and that the estimated useful
lives of assets were within an acceptable range when
compared to those used in the industry.
105
Independent Auditors Report
3
The key audit matter How the matter was addressed in
our audit
Impairment assessment of the goodwill allocated to the Electricity distribution and Gas distribution
cash generating units ($953.1 million).
Refer to Note 14 of the financial statements.
We considered the impairment assessment of the
Electricity distribution and Gas distribution cash
generating units to be a key audit matter due to the
significance of goodwill ($953.1 million) to the
financial position of the group, the recognition of an
impairment of $37 million in connection with the
gas distribution cash generating unit and the
significant judgement used to estimate future
pricing of the regulated revenue streams beyond
the timeframe of the current Commerce
Commission regulatory price paths.
Our audit procedures in this area included, among
others:
• assessing whether the methodology adopted in the
discounted cash flow models was consistent with
accepted valuation approaches of NZ IAS 36
Impairment of Assets and within the energy industry;
• evaluating the significant future cash flow
assumptions by comparing to historical trends,
budgets and where applicable, Asset Management
Plans, and regulatory pricing models;
• comparing the discount rates applied to the
estimated future cash flows and the terminal growth
rates to relevant benchmarks using our own
valuation specialists;
• challenging the above assumptions and judgements
by performing sensitivity analysis, considering a
range of likely outcomes based on various
scenarios;
• calculating the regulated asset base (‘RAB’) multiple
implied by valuation of the respective cash
generating unit and comparing this to the range of
RAB multiples observed in the marketplace; and
• comparing the group’s net assets as at 30 June
2025 to its market capitalisation at 30 June 2025.
We found the methodology to be consistent with industry
norms, specifically:
• the discount and terminal growth rates were in an
acceptable industry range;
• future cash flow assumptions were supported by
comparison to the sources we considered above;
and
• the overall comparison of the group’s net assets to
market capitalisation did not indicate an impairment.
Vector Annual Report 2025106
4
Other information
The directors, on behalf of the Group, are responsible for the other information. The other information comprises
information included in the entity’s Annual Report, Climate Related Disclosures Report and Greenhouse Gas
Emissions Inventory Report, but does not include the financial statements and our auditor’s report thereon.
Our opinion on the consolidated financial statements does not cover any other information and we do not
express any form of assurance conclusion thereon.
In connection with our audit of the consolidated financial statements our responsibility is to read the other
information and in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the
consolidated financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit or otherwise appears materially
misstated.
If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude there is a material misstatement of this other information,
we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report in this regard.
Use of this independent auditor’s report
This independent auditor’s report is made solely to the shareholders. Our audit work has been undertaken so
that we might state to the shareholders those matters we are required to state to them in the independent
auditor’s report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, none of KPMG, any entities
directly or indirectly controlled by KPMG, or any of their respective members or employees, accept or assume
any responsibility and deny all liability to anyone other than the shareholders for our audit work, this independent
auditor’s report, or any of the opinions we have formed.
Responsibilities of directors for the consolidated financial
statements
The directors, on behalf of the Group, are responsible for:
— the preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with NZ
IFRS issued by the New Zealand Accounting Standards Board and the International Financial Reporting
Standards issued by the International Accounting Standards Board;
— implementing the necessary internal control to enable the preparation of a consolidated set of financial
statements that is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; and
— assessing the ability of the Group to continue as a going concern. This includes disclosing, as
applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless
they either intend to liquidate or to cease operations or have no realistic alternative but to do so.
107
Independent Auditors Report
5
Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the consolidated
financial statements
Our objective is:
— to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from
material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; and
— to issue an independent auditor’s report that includes our opinion.
Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but it is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in
accordance with ISAs NZ will always detect a material misstatement when it exists.
Misstatements can arise from fraud or error. They are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they
could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of the
consolidated financial statements.
A further description of our responsibilities for the audit of the consolidated financial statements is located at the
External Reporting Board (XRB) website at:
https://www.xrb.govt.nz/standards/assurance-standards/auditors-responsibilities/audit-report-1 -1/
This description forms part of our independent auditor’s report.
The engagement partner on the audit resulting in this independent auditor’s report is Matthew Diprose.
For and on behalf of:
KPMG
Auckland
22 August 2025
Vector Annual Report 2025108
Statutory
Information
109
Statutory information
Interests register
Each company in the group is required to maintain an interests register in which the particulars of certain transactions
and matters involving the directors must be recorded. The interests registers for Vector Limited and its subsidiaries are
available for inspection at their registered offices.
Particulars of entries in the interests registers as at 30 June 2025 are set out in this Statutory Information section.
Information used by directors
During the financial year there were no notices from directors of Vector Limited, or any subsidiary, requesting to use
information received in their capacity as a director which would not otherwise have been available to them.
Indemnification and insurance of directors and officers
As permitted by the constitution and the Companies Act 1993, Vector Limited has indemnified its directors, and those
directors who are directors of subsidiaries against potential liabilities and costs they may incur for acts or omissions
in their capacity as directors. In addition, Vector Limited has indemnified certain senior employees against potential
liabilities and costs they may incur for acts or omissions in their capacity as employees of Vector Limited, or directors
of Vector subsidiaries or associates.
During the financial year, Vector Limited paid insurance premiums in respect of directors and certain senior employees’
liability insurance which covers risks normally covered by such policies arising out of acts or omissions of directors and
employees in their capacity as such. Insurance is not provided for criminal liability or liability or costs in respect of which
an indemnity is prohibited by law.
Donations
Vector Limited made donations of $10,000 during the year ended 30 June 2025. Subsidiaries of Vector Limited made
donations of $23,000 during the year ended 30 June 2025. Vector does not make political donations, these amounts
represent donations to charitable organisations.
Credit rating
At 30 June 2025 Vector Limited had a Standard & Poor’s credit rating of BBB+.
NZX regulation waivers and rulings
Vector has not relied on any new waivers or rulings in the year ended 30 June 2025. Vector continues to rely on waivers
and rulings granted by NZ RegCo on 30 June 2020 relating to Vector’s special relationship with Entrust available to
review at https://www.nzx.com/companies/VCT/documents. Vector has a non-standard designation as a result of these
waivers, and provisions in Vector’s constitution reflecting Vector’s relationship with Entrust.
Exercise of NZX powers
NZX did not exercise any of its powers set out in Listing Rule 9.9.3 (relating to powers to cancel, suspend or censure
an issuer) with respect to Vector Limited.
Trustees of Entrust
During the year ended 30 June 2025 Vector Limited made payments to A Bell and P Hutchison, trustees of
Entrust (Vector Limited’s majority shareholder), totalling $254,000 in respect of their roles as directors on the
Vector Limited board
Subsidiaries and associates
A list of each of the Company’s subsidiaries and associates is contained on pages 82 and 83.
Vector Annual Report 2025110
Statutory Information
Directors
The following directors of Vector Limited and current group companies held office as at 30 June 2025 or resigned (R) as a
director during the year ended 30 June 2025. Directors marked (A) were appointed during the year.
PARENTDIRECTORS
Vector LimitedA Bell, V Busby (A), B Hassall (R), P Hutchison, D McKay, P Rebstock,
B Turner, A Urlwin
All of the above directors in office as at 30 June 2025 are independent directors, except for A Bell and P Hutchison who are
trustees of Entrust (Vector Limited’s majority shareholder).
SUBSIDIARIESDIRECTORS
Cristal Air International LimitedJ Hollingworth, S Mackenzie
E-Co Products Group LimitedJ Hollingworth, S Mackenzie
Equalise Cyber Security LimitedJ Hollingworth, S Mackenzie
Vector Advanced Metering Assets (Australia) LimitedJ Hollingworth, S Mackenzie
Vector Auckland Property LimitedJ Hollingworth, S Mackenzie
Vector Communications LimitedJ Hollingworth, S Mackenzie
Vector Energy Solutions (Australia) Pty LimitedJ Hollingworth, S Mackenzie, J Sheridan (R), D Van Gerrevink (A)
Vector Energy Solutions LimitedJ Hollingworth, S Mackenzie
Vector ESPS Trustee LimitedJ Hollingworth, S Mackenzie
Vector Gas Trading LimitedJ Hollingworth, S Mackenzie
Vector Investment Holdings LimitedJ Hollingworth, S Mackenzie
Vector MeterCo LimitedJ Hollingworth, S Mackenzie
Vector Northern Property LimitedJ Hollingworth, S Mackenzie
Vector SPV No. 1 LimitedJ Hollingworth, S Mackenzie
Vector SPV No.2 LimitedJ Hollingworth, S Mackenzie
Vector Technology Solutions LimitedJ Hollingworth, S Mackenzie
Vector Technology Solutions Holdings USA LLCVector Technology Solutions Limited is the manager
VTS USA LLCVector Technology Solutions Limited is the manager
ASSOCIATESDIRECTORS
Bluecurrent Holdings NZ LimitedM Angelini, S Clarke, S Farrier, A Hill, S Mackenzie, P Mulholland,
P Rebstock, M Tume
Bluecurrent Holdings (Australia) Pty LimitedA Andriopolous (R), M Angelini, S Clarke, S Farrier, A Hill, S Mackenzie,
P Mulholland, P Rebstock, M Tume
111
Statutory Information
Directors continued
Directors’ remuneration and value of other benefits received from Vector Limited for the year ended 30 June 2025 is included
in the remuneration report on page 43. Directors’ remuneration and value of other benefits received from current group
companies for the year ended 30 June 2025:
Directors of subsidiaries
PAID BY
PARENT
$
PAID BY
SUBSIDIARIES
$
B Behdin–2,917*
E Bilitzki–2,917*
S Bridge–2,917
N Hannan–2,917
G O’Brien–2,917
R Sharp–2,917*
P Thorley–2,917*
M Trigg–32,083
–52,502
* Directors’ fees relating to any Vector Limited employee are paid to the company. Note that S Bridge, P Goodeve, N Hannan, G O’Brien and M Trigg are not Vector employees.
This table lists directors or former directors of Liquigas Limited. Vector sold its shareholding of Liquigas Limited on 31 January
2025.
Directors of Vector Limited
Entries in the interests register of Vector Limited as at 30 June 2025 that are not set out elsewhere in this annual report:
DIRECTORENTITYPOSITION
A BellEntrustTrus te e
V BusbyEnergy One Limited (ASX:EOL)Shareholder
Energy Queensland LimitedDirector
Netlogix Australia Pty LimitedChair
Netlogix Group Holdings LimitedDirector
Reardon Capital Pty LimitedDirector
Scheme Financial Vehicle Limited (SFV)Chair
P HutchisonBeenz LimitedDirector and shareholder
Beenz (USA) LimitedShareholder
EntrustTrus te e
Franklin Medical Properties LimitedDirector and shareholder
Geneva Finance LimitedShareholder
Helena Bay Honey New Zealand LimitedDirector and shareholder
Helena Bay Honey Northland NZ LimitedDirector and shareholder
Helena Bay Honey NZ Partnership LimitedDirector and shareholder
Helena Health New Zealand LimitedDirector and shareholder
Paul Charles Investments LimitedDirector and shareholder
PPB Properties LimitedDirector and shareholder
Pukekohe Cinemas LimitedDirector and shareholder
South Pacific Star Cinemas Investments LimitedDirector and shareholder
D McKayContact Energy LimitedShareholder
Delegat Group LimitedDirector
IAG New Zealand LimitedDirector
IAG (NZ) Holdings LimitedDirector
Wymac Consulting LimitedDirector and shareholder
Vector Annual Report 2025112
Statutory Information
DIRECTORENTITYPOSITION
P RebstockAIA New Zealand Limited Deputy Chair
Arc Innovations LimitedDirector
Auckland One Rail LimitedDirector
Bluecurrent (Australia) Pty LimitedDirector
Bluecurrent Assets (Australia) Pty LimitedDirector
Bluecurrent Assets NZ LimitedDirector
Bluecurrent Holdings (Australia) Pty LimitedDirector
Bluecurrent Holdings NZ LimitedDirector
Bluecurrent No.2 (Australia) Pty LimitedDirector
Bluecurrent No.2 NZ LimitedDirector
Bluecurrent No.3 (Australia) Pty LimitedDirector
Bluecurrent No.3 NZ LimitedDirector
Bluecurrent NZ LimitedDirector
Bluecurrent Services NZ LimitedDirector
Freightlink LimitedDirector
National Hauora Coalition LimitedChair
Ngāti Whātua Ōrākei Whai Maia LimitedChair
NZ Healthcare Investments LimitedChair
NZX LimitedDeputy Chair
On Being Bold LimitedDirector and shareholder
Sealink New Zealand LimitedDirector
Sealink Pine Harbour LimitedDirector
Sealink Travel Group New Zealand LimitedDirector
B TurnerCommodity Insights Digest (Bayes Business School, UK)Editorial Board Member
Fonterra Co-Operative Group LimitedSenior Advisor
GlobalDairyTrade Holdings LimitedDirector
The Arapaho Springs TrustTrus te e
The Arapaho Springs Investment TrustTrus te e
A UrlwinCity Rail Link LimitedDirector
Clifton Creek LimitedDirector and shareholder
Infratil LimitedDirector
Precinct Properties New Zealand LimitedChair
Urlwin Associates LimitedDirector and shareholder
Ventia Services Group LimitedDirector
The entities listed above against each director may transact with Vector Limited and its subsidiaries in the normal course of
business. Auckland based directors (A Bell, P Hutchison, D McKay, P Rebstock, and B Turner) are Vector Limited residential
electricity customers.
Directors of subsidiaries
There are no entries in the interests register of subsidiaries up to 30 June 2025 that are not set out elsewhere in this annual
report.
Directors continued
Directors of Vector Limited continued
113
Statutory Information
Bondholder statistics
NZDX debt securities distribution as at 30 June 2025:
6.23% Capital bonds
RANGE
NUMBER OF
BONDHOLDERS
PERCENTAGE OF
BONDHOLDERS
NUMBER OF
SECURITIES HELD
PERCENTAGE OF
SECURITIES HELD
5,000 – 9,99944815.85%2,430,0000.79%
10,000 – 49,9991,76262.35%36,446,00011.86%
50,000 – 99,99939814.08%22,974,0007.48%
100,000 – 499,9991896.69%29,302,0009.54%
500,000 – 999,99990.32%5,523,0001.80%
1,000,000 plus200.71%210,530,00068.53%
2,826100.00%307,205,000100.00%
The following current directors of the parent are holders (either beneficially or non-beneficially) of Vector Limited 6.23% capital
bonds as at 30 June 2025:
DIRECTOR
NUMBER OF
BONDS
A Urlwin (as a shareholder of Clifton Creek Limited)33,000
Twenty largest registered 6.23% capital bond holders as at 30 June 2025:
BOND HOLDERBONDS HELD
PERCENTAGE OF
BONDS HELD
Custodial Services Limited <A/C 4>68,206,00022.20%
Forsyth Barr Custodians Limited <1-CUSTODY>48,842,00015.90%
JBWERE (NZ) Nominees Limited <NZ RESIDENT A/C>24,834,0008.08%
FNZ Custodians Limited19,608,0006.38%
Masfen Securities Limited5,980,0001.95%
HSBC Nominees (New Zealand) Limited – NZCSD <HKBN90>5,968,0001.94%
NZX WT Nominees Limited <CASH ACCOUNT>4,682,0001.52%
Forsyth Barr Custodians Limited <ACCOUNT 1 E>4,464,0001.45%
Forsyth Barr Custodians Limited <A/C 1 NRLAIL>4,348,0001.42%
CML Shares Limited4,200,0001.37%
Investment Custodial Services Limited <A/C C>3,281,0001.07%
PIN Twenty Limited <KINTYRE A/C>2,622,0000.85%
Catherine Ann Tuck <PUKETIHI A/C>2,300,0000.75%
Best Farm Limited2,000,0000.65%
Fletcher Building Educational Fund Limited2,000,0000.65%
ANZ Custodial Services New Zealand Limited – NZCSD <PBNK90>1,791,0000.58%
Public Trust Class 10 Nominees Limited – NZCSD1,690,0000.55%
Woolf Fisher Trust Incorporated1,500,0000.49%
KPS Society Limited1,200,0000.39%
FNZ Custodians Limited <DTA NON RESIDENT A/C>1,014,0000.33%
210,530,00068.52%
Vector Annual Report 2025114
Statutory Information
Bondholder statistics continued
3.69% Senior retail bonds
RANGE
NUMBER OF
BONDHOLDERS
PERCENTAGE OF
BONDHOLDERS
NUMBER OF
SECURITIES HELD
PERCENTAGE OF
SECURITIES HELD
5,000 – 9,999316.65%173,0000.08%
10,000 – 49,99928761.59%6,401,0002.84%
50,000 – 99,9996714.38%3,745,0001.66%
100,000 – 499,9994710.09%8,636,0003.84%
500,000 – 999,999143.00%8,686,0003.86%
1,000,000 plus204.29%197,359,00087.72%
466100.00%225,000,000100.00%
Twenty largest registered 3.69% senior retail bond holders as at 30 June 2025:
BOND HOLDERBONDS HELD
PERCENTAGE OF
BONDS HELD
Custodial Services Limited <A/C 4>72,189,00032.08%
FNZ Custodians Limited26,286,00011.68%
HSBC Nominees (New Zealand) Limited – NZCSD <HKBN90>24,103,00010.71%
Forsyth Barr Custodians Limited <1-CUSTODY>18,453,0008.20%
JBWERE (NZ) Nominees Limited <NZ RESIDENT A/C>17,761,0007.89%
BNP Paribas Nominees (Nz) Limited – NZCSD <BPSS40>5,440,0002.42%
ANZ Wholesale NZ Fixed Interest Fund – NZCSD4,332,0001.93%
Forsyth Barr Custodians Limited <ACCOUNT 1 E>3,750,0001.67%
Investment Custodial Services Limited <A/C C>3,551,0001.58%
Citibank Nominees (New Zealand) Limited – NZCSD <CNOM90>3,359,0001.49%
Forsyth Barr Custodians Limited <A/C 1 NRLAIL>2,119,0000.94%
NZX WT Nominees Limited <CASH ACCOUNT>2,095,0000.93%
Dunedin City Council2,000,0000.89%
JBWERE (NZ) Nominees Limited <A/C 31933>2,000,0000.89%
HSBC Nominees (New Zealand) Limited A/C State Street – NZCSD <HKBN45>1,958,0000.87%
Mint Nominees Limited – NZCSD <NZP440>1,903,0000.85%
Pin Twenty Limited <KINTYRE A/C>1,875,0000.83%
FNZ Custodians Limited <DTA NON RESIDENT A/C>1,581,0000.70%
Custodial Services Limited <A/C 12>1,328,0000.59%
Forsyth Barr Custodians Limited <ACCOUNT 1 NRL>1,276,0000.57%
197,359,00087.71%
115
Statutory Information
Shareholder statistics
Twenty largest registered shareholders as at 30 June 2025:
SHAREHOLDER
ORDINARY
SHARES HELD
PERCENTAGE
OF ORDINARY
SHARES HELD
Entrust751,000,00075.10%
Custodial Services Limited <A/C 4>35,545,2863.55%
ANZ Wholesale Australasian Share Fund – NZCSD <PNAS90>16,813,5071.68%
Generate KiwiSaver Public Trust Nominees Limited <NZCSD> <NZP T4 4>13,508,4291.35%
HSBC Nominees (New Zealand) Limited – NZCSD <HKBN90>11,739,2801.17%
BNP Paribas Nominees (NZ) Limited – NZCSD <BPSS40>10,723,7601.07%
Accident Compensation Corporation – NZCSD <ACCI40>8,643,5780.86%
FNZ Custodians Limited8,346,9730.83%
CITIBANK Nominees (New Zealand) Limited – NZCSD <CNOM90>7,887,4720.79%
JPMorgan Chase Bank NA NZ Branch-Segregated Clients ACCT – NZCSD <CHAM24>7,553,6620.76%
Forsyth Barr Custodians Limited <1-CUSTODY>6,001,7880.60%
New Zealand Depository Nominee Limited <A/C 1 CASH ACCOUNT>5,727,0510.57%
JBWere (NZ) Nominees Limited <NZ RESIDENT A/C>5,485,5910.55%
Tea Custodians Limited Client Property Trust Account – NZC SD <T E AC4 0 >4,951,6770.50%
HSBC Nominees (New Zealand) Limited A/C State Street – NZCSD <HKBN45>3,432,8610.34%
Simplicity Nominees Limited – NZCSD3,143,5980.31%
ANZ Custodial Services New Zealand Limited – NZCSD <PBNK90>1,894,8510.19%
Public Trust – NZCSD <THE ASPIRING FUND>1,719,8460.17%
FNZ Custodians Limited <DTA NON RESIDENT A/C>1,265,1060.13%
ANZ Wholesale NZ Share Fund – NZCSD <PNSF90>1,137,7270.11%
906,522,04390.63%
Substantial product holders as at 30 June 2025:
SHAREHOLDER
NUMBER OF
RELEVANT
INTEREST VOTING
PRODUCTS HELD
PERCENTAGE
OF VOTING
PRODUCTS HELD
Entrust 751,000,00075.10%
Alastair Bell, Paul Hutchison, Rachel Langton, Denise Lee and Angus Ogilvie are the registered holders of the shares held by
Entrust.
Vector Annual Report 2025116
Statutory Information
Shareholder statistics continued
As at 30 June 2025, voting products issued by Vector Limited totalled 1,000,000,000 ordinary shares.
Ordinary shares distribution as at 30 June 2025
RANGE
NUMBER OF
SHAREHOLDERS
PERCENTAGE OF
SHAREHOLDERS
NUMBER OF
SHARES HELD
PERCENTAGE OF
SHARES HELD
1 – 4995,77922.72%1,779,8960.18%
500 – 9992,87111.29%2,222,4760.22%
1,000 – 4,99912,83850.47%22,828,3252.28%
5,000 – 9,9991,9497.66%12,986,7691.30%
10,000 – 49,9991,7987.07%32,007,8303.20%
50,000 – 99,9991220.48%7,723,2330.77%
100,000 plus780.31%920,451,47192.05%
25,435100.00%1,000,000,000100.00%
Analysis of shareholders as at 30 June 2025:
SHAREHOLDER TYPE
NUMBER OF
SHAREHOLDERS
PERCENTAGE OF
SHAREHOLDERS
NUMBER OF
SHARES HELD
PERCENTAGE OF
SHARES HELD
Entrust10.00%751,000,00075.10%
Companies8203.22%14,835,3781.49%
Individual Holders14,26456.08%43,132,2654.31%
Joint6,89027.09%29,039,6992.90%
Nominee Companies2641.04%156,911,00515.69%
Other3,19612.57%5,081,6530.51%
25,435100.00%1,000,000,000100.00%
Alastair Bell, Paul Hutchison, Rachel Langton, Denise Lee and Angus Ogilvie are the registered holders of the 751,000,000
ordinary shares held by Entrust. Alastair Bell and Paul Hutchison are directors of Vector Limited.
The following disclosures are made pursuant to section 148 of the Companies Act 1993, in relation to dealings during the year
ended 30 June 2025 by directors of Vector Limited in the ordinary shares of Vector Limited:
There were no acquisitions or disposals of relevant interests.
117
Statutory Information
Financial calendar
2025
Final dividend paid 17 September
Annual meeting 30 September
2026
First quarter operating statistics October
Second quarter operating statistics January
Half year result and interim report February
Interim dividend* April
Third quarter operating statistics April
Fourth quarter operating statistics July
Full year result and annual report August
Final dividend* September
* Dividends are subject to Board determination.
Investor information
Ordinary shares in Vector Limited are listed and quoted on the New Zealand Stock Market (NZSX) under the company code VCT.
Vector also has capital bonds and unsubordinated fixed rate bonds listed and quoted on the New Zealand Debt Market (NZDX).
Current information about Vector’s trading performance for its shares and bonds can be obtained on the NZX website at
www.nzx.com. Further information about Vector is available on our website www.vector.co.nz.
Directory
Registered office
Vector Limited
110 Carlton Gore Road
Newmarket
Auckland 1023
New Zealand
Telephone 64-9-978 7788
Facsimile 64-9-978 7799
www.vector.co.nz
Postal address
PO Box 99882
Newmarket
Auckland 1149
New Zealand
Investor enquiries
Telephone 64-9-978 7735
Email: investor@vector.co.nz
This annual report is dated
22 August 2025 and signed
on behalf of the Board by:
Doug McKay Anne Urlwin
Chair Chair, audit committee
insight
creative.co.nz
VEC266
118
Statutory Information
Vector Annual Report 2025
VECTOR.CO.NZ
---
Financial and
Operational Results
FULL YEAR ENDING 30 JUNE 2025
Presentation Date: 25 August 2025
Disclaimer
This presentation contains forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking statements often include words such as “anticipates”, “estimates”, “expects”,
“intends”, “plans”, “believes” and similar words in connection with discussions of future operating
or financial performance.
The forward-looking statements are based on management's and directors’ current expectations
and assumptions regarding Vector’s businesses and performance, the economy and other future
conditions, circumstances and results.
As with any projection or forecast, forward-looking statements are inherently susceptible to
uncertainty and changes in circumstances. Vector’s actual results may vary materially from those
expressed or implied in its forward-looking statements.
2
Agenda
3
•Overview of Financial Performance
•Financial Performance
•Segment Performance
•Outlook & Market Commentary
•Q&A
OVERVIEW OF FINANCIAL
PERFORMANCE
4
Variance
excludes
Discontinued
Operations
Overview of financial performance
5
Adjusted EBITDA is not a GAAP measure of profit. For a reconciliation of adjusted EBITDA to EBITDA and net profit refer to the appendix of this presentation.
FY24 refers to Financial Year 24 for the twelve months ending 30 June 2024. FY25 refers to Financial Year 25 for the twelve months ending 30 June 2025.
Revenue
Adjusted
EBITDA
Gross Capital
Expenditure
Operating
Cashflow
NPAT
+9%+16%-6%+16%+105%
Figures shown in
$NZD Millions
Full Year FY25 vs Full Year FY24
Grey bars represent the discontinued operations of Gas Trading
which included Ongas, Liquigas and in prior years also Natural Gas.
The subset of Natural Gas was sold on 1 July 2024 with Ongas and
Liquigas then sold on the 31
st
of January 2025.
Blue bars represent the ongoing continuing operations of Vector.
818
894
345
401
76
155
499
470
445
515
229
79
36
13
15
13
11
3
1,046
973
382
414
91
168
510
473
445
515
FY24FY25FY24FY25FY24FY25FY24FY25FY24FY25
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE
6
Adjusted EBITDA (from continuing operations) up $56m / 16%
7
FY25 Full Year adjusted EBITDA movement vs prior year ($M)
•With the sale of our gas trading segment, we now have a new segment reporting structure (as reported in the
half year results) of electricity, gas distribution and other.
•Other is a non-reportable segment and includes VTS, HRV, Vector Fibre, Equalise and group eliminations.
•Corporate costs are now allocated out to the revenue generating business units in line with the regulatory
allocation methodology (this was implemented for the half year results also).
345
+57
+2-3
401
FY24ElectricityGas
Distribution
OtherFY25
NPAT from continuing operations are up $79m
8
“Other” includes, share of associates, fair value changes on financial instruments and tax.
FY25 Full Year NPAT from continuing operations movement vs prior year ($M)
76
+56
+15-13
-20
+23
+18155
FY24Adj. EBITDACapital
Contributions
Depreciation
and
Amortisation
Net InterestImpairmentOtherFY25
FY24: -$60m
FY25: -$37m
Variance: +$23m
Lower gross capex and capital contributions
9
•Gross capex decrease of $29m to $470m. Net capex (after deducting contributions) down $44m / 15% to
$260m. Contributions up 8% to $211m, largely attributable to relocation projects such as SH16 Safe road Stage
1 Huapai,and system growth contributions driven by higher incremental capacity
•Year on year electricity replacement capex has decreased by $33m primarily driven by work completed last
year to improve resilience and reliability of network security and to also restore the network post the extreme
weather events in FY23
Note 1. All years adjusted to exclude discontinued operations;
Gross Capital Expenditure ($M)FY25 Full Year Gross Capex movement vs prior year ($M)
Gas D’ and
Other Capex
Electricity
Capex
264
239
219
304
304
260
86
122
152
188
195
211
350
362
370
492
499
470
FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25
Net capexCapital contributions
457
432
42
38
499
+8-33
-3
-1
470
FY24Electricity
Growth
Electricity
Replace-
ment
Gas
Distribution
OtherFY25
Strong Balance Sheet
10
Vector’s Standard and Poor’s credit rating is BBB+ with a stable outlook
Net Economic Debt ($B) and Gearing
Debt Maturity Profile ($M)
Note. Gearing is defined as economic net debt to economic net debt plus adjusted equity. Adjusted equity means total equity adjusted for hedge reserves.
2.92
3.01
3.11
3.16
3.30
3.41
1.93
2.14
2.13
2.23
2.15
56%
56%
57%
57%
58%
59%
33%
36%36%
38%
37%
JunDecJunDecJunDecJunDecJunDecJun
202020212022202320242025
Economic net debt ($B)Gearing
100
475
277
138
574
223
170
307
225
577
977
FY26FY27FY28FY29FY30FY31FY32FY33FY34FY35
Bank FacilitiesUSPP
Wholesale BondsCapital Bonds
Retail Bonds
SEGMENT PERFORMANCE
11
Electricity - adjusted EBITDA up $57m / 19%
12
•Electricity revenue is higher due to price
adjustments reflecting the impact of
high historic inflation, higher pass-
through costs such as transmission and
the DPP4 reset from 1 April;
•Higher opex costs are largely due to
increase in pass-through costs ($15.5m)
which is offset by an increase in
revenue.
•Total net connections continue to grow
with electricity connections up 1.2%
on FY24 to 632,106.
•However, new connections inFY25 have
been 3,411 lower than FY24, reflective of
the broader economic slowdown.
Adjusted EBITDA Movement ($M)
New Connections
000’s
Total Connections
000’s
Note 1. New connections refers to gross new connections. Net connections accounts for disconnections and cancellations which represents the movement in total connections.
11.1
11.0
12.2
15.0
13.5
15.9
16.0
12.5
FY
18
FY
19
FY
20
FY
21
FY
22
FY
23
FY
24
FY
25
563
571
580
591
600
613
624
632
FY
18
FY
19
FY
20
FY
21
FY
22
FY
23
FY
24
FY
25
295
+75-18
352
FY24RevenueOpexFY25
Gas Distribution - adjusted EBITDA up $2m / 4%
13
•Our Gas Distribution business builds and
maintains the gas network within the
wider Auckland region.
•Gas revenue is higher due to price
increases and prior period wash up
partially offset by lower volumes.
Volumes were 8.5% lower compared with
FY24, due to lower demand across all
sectors.
•Opex costs are consistent to prior year.
•Total connections relatively flat at 0.2%
increase but noting the continuing
decline in new connections over the last
five years.
•As mentioned earlier we have recognised
a $37m impairment in FY25. This is
recorded below Adjusted EBITDA.
Adjusted EBITDA Movement ($M)
New Connections
000’s
Total Connections
000’s
Note 1. New connections refers to gross new connections. Net connections accounts for disconnections and cancellations which represents the movement in total connections.
3.2
3.3
3.2
3.8
3.1
2.7
1.9
1.3
FY
18
FY
19
FY
20
FY
21
FY
22
FY
23
FY
24
FY
25
109
112
114
116
118
120
120
121
FY
18
FY
19
FY
20
FY
21
FY
22
FY
23
FY
24
FY
25
45
+2-0
47
FY24RevenueOpexFY25
Investment in Bluecurrent
14
•While this business is making a net loss, it is still cash
generative and performing in line with expectations.
•In FY25 we received $51.8m of distributions in
relation to our 50% shareholding.
Ke y Financials $MFY24FY25Δ
Net Book Value of Investment684606(79)
Financial statement values below at total value unless stated
Revenue29132534
Net profit/(loss) after tax(50)(42)8
Vector's 50% share of Net profit (25)(21)4
Total Assets2,7792,86283
Total Liabilities1,8331,997164
Net Assets946865(81)
OUTLOOK & MARKET COMMENTARY
15
Outlook – FY26
16
•As with the half year we will be providing guidance on adjusted EBITDA, gross capex and
capital contributions.
•For adjusted EBITDA the forecast increase on FY25 is driven primarily by the first full year
of the electricity DPP4 period. The forecast increase in capital spend is linked to expected
customer driven growth and our continued investment in the network.
•For FY26 the guidance range is as follows.
•Adjusted EBITDA: $470m - $490m
•Gross Capex: $520m - $590m
•Capital Contributions: $180m – $230m
7.50
7.75
8.00
8.258.258.258.258.258.25
9.25
12.00
8.00
8.00
8.00
8.00
8.258.25
8.508.508.50
13.00
13.00
5.50
1.75
15.50
15.75
16.00
16.25
16.5016.50
16.7516.75
22.25
24.00
25.00
FY15FY16FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25
InterimFinalSpecial
Final FY25 Dividend
17
•Final dividend of 13.00 cents per share with no
imputation.
•A total dividend for FY25 of 25.00 cents per
share up 1 cent on FY24. This represents an
85% payout of free cashflow post debt finance.
•Dividend record date of 5 September 2025
and payment date of 17 September 2025
Dividend Trend (cents per share)
FY25 D iv id e n d Ca lcu la tion$M
Operating Cashflow515.2
Investing Activities - Capex (cash)(474.9)
Investing Activities - Bluecurrent36.2
Contingent consideration10.8
Lease liabilities payments(8.4)
Fre e Ca sh flow p re D e b t. Fin a n ce7 8. 9
Gross Capex (cash)474.9
Less Capital Contributions (cash)(190.0)
N e t Ca p e x284 . 9
D e b t Fu n d in g @ 7 5% N e t Ca p e x21 3. 7
Fre e Ca sh flow p ost D e b t Fin a n ce29 2. 6
D iv id e n d Pa y ou t250 . 0
% of Fre e Ca sh flow p ost D e b t Fin a n ce85%
Q&A
ANY QUESTIONS?
18
APPENDICES
19
Segment Results – Continuing Operations
20
1. Other is not a reportable segment. Includes VTS, HRV, Vector Fibre, Equalise and inter-segment eliminations,
E le ctricity
Gas Dis tribu tion
Othe r
1
Total
FY24
FY25
Δ
FY24
FY25
Δ
FY24
FY25
Δ
FY24
FY25
Δ
Adju s te d E BI TDA
Revenue excl. Capital
Contributions
687
762
75
+11%
65
67
2.1
+3%
65
64
(1)
-2%
818
894
76
+9%
Operating Expenses
(392)
(410)
(18)
-5%
(20)
(21)
(0.2)
-1%
(60)
(62)
(2)
-3%
(472)
(492)
(20)
-4%
Ad ju ste d E B I TD A
29 5
352
57
+1 9 %
45
47
1.9
+4 %
5
3
(3)
- 54 %
34 5
4 0 1
56
+1 6 %
Cape x
Growth
219
226
8
+3%
12
10
(3)
-21%
14
15
1
+6%
245
251
6
+2%
Replacement
238
205
(33)
-14%
10
9
(1)
-6%
6
5
(2)
-28%
254
219
(35)
-14%
Gross Ca p e x
4 57
4 32
(25)
- 5%
22
19
(3)
- 1 4 %
20
19
(1 )
- 4 %
4 9 9
4 7 0
(29 )
- 6 %
Capital Contributions
(183)
(196)
(13)
-7%
(11)
(13)
(3)
-24%
(1)
(1)
0
+7%
(195)
(211)
(15)
-8%
N e t Ca p e x
27 4
236
(38)
- 1 4 %
11
6
(6 )
- 50 %
19
18
(1 )
- 4 %
30 4
26 0
(4 4 )
- 1 5%
GAAP to Non-GAAP Reconciliation
21
Vector’s standard profit measure prepared under New Zealand GAAP
is net profit. Vector has used non-GAAP profit measures when
discussing financial performance in this document. The directors and
management believe that these measures provide useful
information as they are used internally to evaluate performance of
business units, to establish operational goals and to allocate
resources. For a more comprehensive discussion on the use of non-
GAAP profit measures, please refer to the policy ‘Reporting non-
GAAP profit measures’ available on our website (vector.co.nz).
Non-GAAP profit measures are not prepared in accordance with NZ
IFRS (New Zealand International Financial Reporting Standards) and
are not uniformly defined, therefore the non-GAAP profit measures
reported in this document may not be comparable with those that
other companies report and should not be viewed in isolation or
considered as a substitute for measures reported by Vector in
accordance with NZ IFRS.
Definitions
EBITDA
Earnings before interest, taxation, depreciation, amortisation,
impairment, associates and fair value changes.
Adjusted EBITDA
EBITDA adjusted for third party contributions and significant
one-off gains, losses, revenues and/or expenses.
Extract from the financial statements
G A A P to Non- G A A P reconcilia tionFY24FY25
G roup EBITDA a nd A djusted EBITDA$M$M
Reported net profit for the period (GAAP)-
continuing operations
75.6154.7
A dd ba ck :
Net interest costs52.172.4
Tax (benefit)/expense97.786.5
Depreciation and amortisation218.3231.4
Impairment60.037.0
Associates (share of net (profit)/loss)24.921.1
Fair value changes on financial instruments12.08.5
EBITDA - continuing opera tions54 0.6611.6
A djusted for:
Capital contributions(195.3)(210.5)
A djusted EBITDA - continuing opera tions34 5.34 01.1
A djusted EBITDA - discontinued opera tions36.512.9
Tota l G roup a djusted EBITDA381.84 14 .0
END
22
---
VECTOR LIMITED
Results announcement
Results for announcement to the market
Name of issuer VECTOR LIMITED
Reporting Period 12 MONTHS TO 30 JUNE 2025
Previous Reporting Period 12 MONTHS TO 30 JUNE 2024
Currency NEW ZEALAND DOLLAR
Amount (000s) Percentage change
Revenue from continuing
operations
$1,104,000 8.9%
Total Revenue $1,183,231 (4.7%)
Net profit/(loss) from
continuing operations
$154,767 104.8%
Total net profit/(loss) $167,717 84.2%
Interim/Final Dividend
Amount per Quoted Equity
Security
$0.13000000
Imputed amount per Quoted
Equity Security
$0.00000000
Record Date 5 September 2025
Dividend Payment Date 17 September 2025
Current period Prior comparable period
Net tangible assets per
Quoted Equity Security
$2.54916715 $2.62186907
A brief explanation of any of
the figures above necessary
to enable the figures to be
understood
Refer to accompanying audited financial statements
Authority for this announcement
Name of person
authorised
to make this announcement
JOHN RODGER
Contact person for this
announcement
JOHN RODGER
Contact phone number 021 573640
Contact email address john.rodger@vector.co.nz
Date of release through MAP
25/08/2025
Audited financial statements accompany this announcement.
---
Vector Limited
Distribution Notice
Section 1: Issuer information
Name of issuer VECTOR LIMITED
Financial product name/description ORDINARY SHARES
NZX ticker code VCT
ISIN (If unknown, check on NZX
website)
NZVCTE0001S7
Type of distribution
(Please mark with an X in the
relevant box/es)
Full Year X Quarterly
Half Year Special
DRP applies
Record date 05/09/2025
Ex-Date (one business day before the
Record Date)
04/09/2025
Payment date (and allotment date for
DRP)
17/09/2025
Total monies associated with the
distribution
$130,000,000
Source of distribution (for example,
retained earnings)
RETAINED EARNINGS
Currency NEW ZEALAND DOLLARS
Section 2: Distribution amounts per financial product
Gross distribution $0.13000000
Gross taxable amount $0.13000000
Total cash distribution $0.13000000
Excluded amount (applicable to listed
PIEs)
$0.00000000
Supplementary distribution amount $0.0000000
Section 3: Imputation credits and Resident Withholding Tax
Is the distribution imputed No imputation
If fully or partially imputed, please
state imputation rate as % applied
N/A
Imputation tax credits per financial
product
$0.00000000
Resident Withholding Tax per
financial product
$0.04290000
Section 4: Distribution re-investment plan (if applicable)
NOT APPLICABLE
Section 5: Authority for this announcement
Name of person
authorised to make
this announcement
JOHN RODGER
Contact person for this
announcement
JOHN RODGER
Contact phone number
021 573 640
Contact email address John.rodger@vector.co.nz
Date of release through MAP
25/08/2025
---
CLIMATE-RELATED
DISCLOSURES
2025
About this report
This report is the Vector Limited group’s (Vector or the group)
second mandatory climate statement prepared under
New Zealand’s climate-related disclosures regime. The Vector
group comprises Vector Limited and its subsidiaries. This report
relates to the reporting period 1 July 2024 to 30 June 2025 and
constitutes Vector’s climate statement in respect of that period
under the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013 (FMCA).
Under the FMCA, Vector is required to produce climate
statements that comply with the Aotearoa New Zealand Climate
Standards (NZCS) 1, 2 and 3 issued by the External Reporting
Board (XRB). Accordingly, this document has been prepared in
compliance with NZCS 1, 2 and 3, and covers four thematic areas:
governance, strategy, risk management, and metrics and targets.
The intended primary users of this report are existing and
potential investors, lenders and other creditors.
This report is published as part of a reporting suite, which
also includes our FY2025 greenhouse gas emissions inventory
report, and annual report. All three reports are available at
vector.co.nz/investors/reports.
Given this report relates to the FMCA and NZCS requirements, it
necessarily differs from earlier Vector reports prepared voluntarily
in response to the recommendations of the Taskforce on
Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD).
Unless the context otherwise requires, all references in this report
to we, us, our and Vector should be interpreted to relate to the
Vector group.
This report has been subject to limited assurance* by KPMG;
see appendix 1, and legal review by Chapman Tripp.
Doug McKay
Chair
22 August 2025
Anne Urlwin
Chair, audit committee
22 August 2025
Adoption provisions
Vector has elected to use the following NZCS2 adoption provision
for this FY2025 report. This means the disclosures in this report do
not cover these aspects of the NZCS, though some information is
provided to maintain consistency with Vector’s wider disclosures.
Adoption provision 2: Anticipated financial impacts
* A limited assurance engagement is less in scope than a reasonable assurance engagement,
for a detailed explanation – please see page 38.
2Vector climate-related disclosures 2025
GovernanceStrategyRisksOpportunitiesMetrics
and targets
References
and Appendix
Risk
management
Disclaimer
This report is not earnings guidance or financial advice for
investors. Rather, this report provides a summary of Vector’s
current understanding of, and response to, climate-related
risks and opportunities, and Vector’s current climate-related
governance, risk management, strategy, metrics and targets.
The report reflects Vector’s current understanding as of 22
August 2025, in respect of the 12 months ended 30 June 2025.
Climate-related risk management is an emerging area, and
often uses data and methodologies that are developing and
uncertain. Vector acknowledges that the understanding of
climate risk, and the inputs to assist with this understanding
are constantly evolving.
Vector (including its directors, officers and employees) does not:
‒ Represent that the statements, intentions and/or opinions
contained in this report will not change, or will remain correct
after publishing this report, or
‒ Promise to revise or update those statements and opinions
if events or circumstances change or unanticipated events
happen after publishing this report.
Vector is committed to progressing our response to climate-
related risks and opportunities over time but is constrained
by the novel and developing nature of this subject matter.
In particular, the statements contained in this report involve
assumptions, forecasts and projections about Vector’s present
and future strategies and Vector’s future operating environment.
Such statements are inherently uncertain and subject to
limitations, particularly as inputs, available data and information
are likely to change. As such, Vector cautions reliance on climate-
related forward-looking statements that are necessarily less
reliable than other statements Vector may make in our annual
financial reporting.
The risks and opportunities described in this report, and Vector’s
strategies to achieve our targets, may not eventuate or may
be more or less significant than anticipated. There are many
factors that could cause Vector’s actual results, performance
or achievement of climate-related metrics (including targets)
to differ materially from that described, including economic
and technological viability, climatic, government, customer,
and market factors outside of Vector’s control. Vector
gives no representation, warranty or assurance that actual
outcomes or performance will not materially differ from the
forward-looking statements.
To the maximum extent possible under New Zealand law, Vector
(including its directors, officers and employees) does not accept
and expressly disclaims any liability whatsoever for any direct,
indirect or consequential loss or damage occasioned from any
use or inability to use the information contained in this report,
whether directly or indirectly resulting from inaccuracies, defects,
errors, omissions, out-of-date information or otherwise.
Vector makes no representation as to the accuracy of any
information in this report. We recommend you seek independent
advice before acting or relying on any information in this
report. Vector reserves the right to revise statements made in,
or its strategy or business activities described in, this report,
without notice.
This disclaimer should be read along with other methodologies,
assumptions and uncertainties and limitations contained in this
report, as well as in Vector’s greenhouse gas emissions inventory
report for FY2025.
Unless the context otherwise requires, all references to amounts
in $ in this report are estimates, are in New Zealand dollars and all
references to balances or amounts relate to amounts at the end
of each financial year, namely 30 June.
This report is not an offer document and does not constitute an
offer or invitation or investment recommendation to distribute
or purchase securities, shares, or other interests. Nothing in this
report should be interpreted as capital growth, earnings or any
other legal, financial tax or other advice or guidance. For detailed
information on our financial performance, please refer to our
annual report, available at vector.co.nz/investors/reports.
3
GovernanceStrategyRisksOpportunitiesMetrics
and targets
References
and Appendix
Risk
management
Glossary of terms
Table 1: Definition and glossary of terms
TERMDESCRIPTION
CO₂Carbon dioxide
CRDClimate-related disclosures that comply with Aotearoa New Zealand Climate Standards
Demand-side
orchestration
Where demand is shaped through signals (like dynamic operating envelopes) on distributed energy
resources such as electric cars and hot water load
Distributed energy
resources (DER)
Small-scale energy technologies like solar panels, batteries, and electric vehicles that either generate or
store energy
Distributed systems
operator (DSO)
An emerging concept of how the EDBs operating model may evolve
Dynamic operating
envelope
An emerging concept to maintain electricity network security by placing limits on the amount of electricity
that can be imported from, or exported to, the network at any time
EmissionsGreenhouse gas emissions
EPDEnvironmental product declaration
EVElectric vehicle
FlexibilityThe ability for electrical consumption and injection to be adjusted in response to a price signal, grid frequency
or an active signal from the network operator
FSPField service provider
FYFinancial year – 1 July to 30 June
GHGGreenhouse gas
For the purposes of this report, GHGs are the seven gases listed in the Kyoto Protocol. These are currently:
carbon dioxide (CO₂), methane (CH₄), nitrous oxide (N₂O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons
(PFCs), sulphur hexafluoride (SF₆) and nitrogen trifluoride (NF₃)
GHG ProtocolThe Greenhouse Gas Protocol, a partnership between the World Resources Institute (WRI) and the World
Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). The GHG Protocol develops standards and
guidance, such as the Corporate Standard and the Corporate Value Chain (scope 3) Standard, both used
as guidance for this report
IPCC (AR6)Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Sixth Assessment Report)
LPGLiquefied petroleum gas – a mixture of hydrocarbons, consisting primarily of propane and butane. The
higher density – in contrast to natural gas - allows it to be easily compressed to liquid, and is therefore
largely distributed in bottles
MfEMinistry for the Environment (New Zealand)
Natural gasNatural gas is a naturally occurring mixture of gaseous hydrocarbons, consisting primarily of methane.
The gas is largely distributed through piped infrastructure
NGFSNetwork for greening the financial system - an international network of central banks and supervisory
authorities including the Reserve Bank of New Zealand
(NWA) Non-wires
alternative
Solutions like batteries, demand response, or local generation that reduce the need to build or upgrade
traditional electricity infrastructure such as poles and wires
NZCSNew Zealand Climate Standards
RYRegulatory year: 1 July to 30 June for the gas distribution network; 1 April to 31 March for the electricity business
4Vector climate-related disclosures 2025
GovernanceStrategyRisksOpportunitiesMetrics
and targets
References
and Appendix
Risk
management
TERMDESCRIPTION
SAIDISystem average interruption duration index – average outage duration per customer in a regulatory year.
This metric was developed by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) and used by the
Commerce Commission to regulate electricity distribution networks
– Major event SAIDIA 24 hour period during which the cumulative SAIDI due to unplanned events exceeds a predetermined
major event boundary value
SAIFISystem average interruption frequency index – average number of interruptions per customer in a regulatory
year. This metric was developed by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) and used by the
Commerce Commission to regulate electricity distribution networks
SBTiScience Based Targets initiative
SF₆Sulphur hexafluoride – a gas used to electrically insulate electrical assets. SF₆ has a global warming potential
of 23,500 times that of CO₂
tCO₂eTonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent
Traditional
infrastructure
Physical electrical infrastructure, such as electricity cables, lines, transformers and zone substations. This is in
contrast to non-network solutions like demand-side orchestration
5
GovernanceStrategyRisksOpportunitiesMetrics
and targets
References
and Appendix
Risk
management
About Vector
Vector Limited is NZX listed and 75.1% owned by Entrust, a private community trust which represents 368,000 households and
businesses in central, east and south Auckland (as at 2025 roll date).
A breakdown of Vector’s businesses and investments as of 30 June 2025 is detailed in the table below.
VECTOR BUSINESSDESCRIPTIONREVENUE FY2025
($M)
Electricity distribution
network
Owns and operates the electricity distribution network within the wider
Auckland region. We deliver power to more than 630,000 homes and businesses
via more than 19,000 km of electricity lines (underground and overhead).
960.1
Vector Technology
Solutions
A digital solutions business that takes internally developed products to market. 12.3
HRVProvides energy-efficient solutions across New Zealand covering home
ventilation, home heating, and water filtration systems, as well as electric
vehicle charging.
We announced the sale of HRV after the FY2025 balance date, on 1 August 2025.
35.4
Vector FibreOwns and operates a fibre-optic data network within the wider Auckland region.
Vector Fibre is the subject of a previously announced strategic review.
28.8
Natural gas
distribution network
Owns and operates the gas distribution network within the wider Auckland
region, supplying gas to over 120,000 homes and businesses, through some
4,670 km of mains pipelines, distributing around 12 petajoules (PJ) of gas
per year.
80.5
VECTOR INVESTMENTSDESCRIPTION
Bluecurrent
(50% investment)
Smart metering business providing smart meter data services for electricity and
gas meters throughout New Zealand and Australia. Bluecurrent (formerly known
as Vector Metering) is jointly owned by QIC and Vector.
Changes to Vector’s business portfolio
During FY2025 Vector has:
Ceased trading of our Natural Gas Trading business as of 1 July 2024. This business has been on a wind-down since FY2020, whereby
contracts for natural gas sales were not renewed. This has led to year-on-year reductions in scope 3 emissions related to use of sold gas
product. See our greenhouse gas inventory report [1] for more details. We have also removed references in this climate statement to
climate-related risks related to owning a gas trading business.
Sold our Ongas LPG business and Liquigas investment on 31 January 2025. We have recalculated historic greenhouse gas emissions to
exclude these businesses in accordance with the Greenhouse Gas Protocol. We have also removed references in this climate statement
to climate-related risks with regard to owning LPG businesses.
Sold our 8.1% shareholding in mPrest Systems (2023) Limited on 22 August 2024. The impact of mPrest on Vector’s climate-related
disclosures was below materiality thresholds for the purposes of climate-reporting and therefore excluded from previous analysis.
As a result, sale of this investment has no impact.
6Vector climate-related disclosures 2025
GovernanceStrategyRisksOpportunitiesMetrics
and targets
References
and Appendix
Risk
management
Governance
Vector’s board oversight
Vector Limited’s board of directors is the governance body
ultimately responsible for overseeing Vector’s strategic direction
and its climate-related risks and opportunities. Key climate-
related risks and opportunities are considered as part of Vector’s
16 group-level material risks that are monitored with priority by
Vector’s board risk and assurance committee. These 16 risks were
reviewed four times in FY2025 at the group material risk review.
In FY2025 four of these 16 risks relate to climate change. Refer to
the governance report within Vector’s annual report for a list of
these group material risks [1].
The board’s role in relation to climate-related issues is supported
by two board committees: the audit committee, and the risk
and assurance committee. These committees have delegated
responsibility for managing Vector’s risks, including its climate-
related risks and opportunities.
The audit committee is responsible for oversight of climate-
related reporting. This committee meets to review key
accounting decisions which include those regarding climate-
related scenarios, materiality thresholds, consolidated risks and
opportunities, as well as greenhouse gas emissions quantification
and targets. The audit committee is responsible for reviewing and
recommending the climate-related reports, under the Financial
Markets Conduct Act (FMCA), for board approval. The audit
committee is responsible for ensuring Vector’s climate-related
disclosures comply with the New Zealand Climate Standards
(NZCS) and is responsible for external reviews and assurance in
relation to the climate-related disclosures. KPMG has provided
independent limited assurance* over Vector’s CRD, as detailed
in appendix 1. Vector’s greenhouse gas emissions inventory has
also been subject to limited assurance by KPMG, as outlined in
the greenhouse gas emissions inventory report [1]. Additionally,
our CRD has been legally reviewed by Chapman Tripp.
The risk and assurance committee is responsible for the
oversight of climate-related risks and opportunities as part
of the committee’s oversight of Vector’s enterprise risk
management framework.
These two committees are accountable to the board and each
generally meets at least four times per year. Following each
meeting the relevant committee updates the board in relation
to matters within its scope that significantly affect Vector, as
well as noting decisions of the committee and recommendations
to the board. The board notes or approves the findings or
recommendations of the committees as appropriate.
All committee papers are available to the full board and all
directors have the opportunity to submit questions and/or
attend committee meetings.
Members of Vector’s management attend the meetings of
the committees also, where relevant, to provide a two-way
engagement between the board and management. Charters
of the board and relevant committees can be found in the
governance section of Vector’s website [2].
Board of directors
Governance body ultimately responsible for overseeing Vector’s strategic direction and Vector’s climate-related risks
and opportunities. 7 Members
Board audit committee
Responsible for oversight of climate-related reporting
and key accounting judgments. 3 Members
Board risk and assurance committee
Responsible for the oversight of climate-related risks
and opportunities as part of Vector’s wider enterprise
risk management framework. 3 Members
Executive management
Executive leadership and day-to-day management for ensuring delivery
and development of the strategic objectives. 7 Members
Climate change steering committee
Normally meets monthly with senior management
to provide executive oversight of climate-change-related
topics. 5 Members
Chief public policy and
regulatory officer
Holds executive responsibility for climate-change-
related-risks and opportunities.
Group sustainability
Consults business units to explore climate-
related opportunities, climate adaptation, and
decarbonisation strategy.
Group risk
Responsible for Vector’s group enterprise
risk management framework used to identify and
assess climate-related risks and opportunities.
Group finance
Oversees and analyses financial impacts
of material risks and opportunities,
reports on group-level metrics, and manages
carbon accounting.
Group insights
Conducts scenario analysis, and
models of key risks and opportunities.
Board
Executive
Group
Level
* A limited assurance engagement is less in scope than a reasonable assurance engagement,
for a detailed explanation – please see page 38.
7
StrategyRisks
GovernanceOpportunitiesMetrics
and targets
References
and Appendix
Risk
management
The board ensures that it has the appropriate skills and
competencies by accessing expertise from within the group as
well as external advice where needed. For example, the group
sustainability team has expertise in physical and transitional
climate change trends, while the group insights team has
skills to produce and update transitional scenario models for
the electricity and gas distribution networks. The board also
holds sessions that assist in upskilling the directors on topics
relevant to Vector’s businesses. For example, in FY2025 the
board held a session with the group chief executive and the
chief operating officer of electricity, gas and fibre on the status
of the gas distribution network about uncertain gas volumes
and the incoming regulatory reset. Vector’s board charter
requires that all directors continuously educate themselves
to ensure that they can perform their duties appropriately
and effectively. A summary of key board and board committee
meetings in FY2025 is found in figure 1 below.
Vector’s executive management oversight
The group chief executive is responsible for the day-to-day
leadership and management of Vector’s businesses to ensure
the business strategy and objectives are successfully developed
and delivered. The climate change steering committee is a
subcommittee of the executive, consisting of five members, to
provide executive oversight of climate-related topics including
climate change risks and opportunities. Meetings are typically
held monthly
1
; however, when the agenda consists only of
updates, an email summary may be provided in place of a
formal meeting. The climate change steering committee is
chaired by the chief public policy and regulatory officer, who
holds overall executive responsibility for climate-related risks
and opportunities. The climate change steering committee
reports to the chief executive periodically via the chief public
policy and regulatory officer.
September 2024
Reviewed group material risks
which includes climate-related
risks - this occurs quarterly
November 2024
Update on scenarios, methods,
and judgments influencing
Vector’s FY2025 climate-related
disclosures
Reviewed group material risks
February 2025
Reviewed Vector’s greenhouse
gas commitments
March 2025
Reviewed group material risks
Approved climate-related risks
and opportunities identified
through the business unit risk
review
Approved the electricity asset
management plan which
contains 10-year investment
and maintenance
programmes over the period
1 April 2025 to 31 March 2035
Deep dive on gas distribution
May 2025
Approved short-term incentive
measures for the following
financial year
June 2025
Reviewed key judgments made
during modelling, carbon emission
calculation, and a draft of the
climate-related disclosures
Approved the gas asset
management plan which contains
10-year investment and
maintenance programmes over the
period 1 July 2025 to 30 June 2035
Reviewed group material risks.
Update on Vector Technology
Solutions
August 2025
Recommended climate-related
disclosures to the board
Recommended the greenhouse
gas emissions inventory report to
the board
Approved climate-related
disclosures
Approved greenhouse gas
emissions inventory report
Update on Vector Technology
Solutions
Approved staff incentive target for
the following financial year
B
R
A
Board audit committee
Board risk and assurance committee
Board
B
R
R
R
R
R
B
B
B
A
B
B
B
B
B
B
A
A
A
December 2024
Update on Vector Technology
Solutions - this is related to the
energy platforms opportunity
B
Figure 1: Key board and board committee meetings that occurred during FY2025 related to climate-related risks and opportunities
1. In FY2025 there were eight climate change steering committee meetings
Governance (continued)
8Vector climate-related disclosures 2025
StrategyRisksOpportunitiesMetrics
and targets
References
and Appendix
Risk
management
Governance
Tracking climate-related metrics and targets
The climate-related metrics set out in this report are prepared
by Vector’s management and discussed with the Vector board
audit committee. The metrics are monitored by management
and integrated into performance dashboards. Any noteworthy
changes in Vector’s performance against metrics can be
reported to the group chief executive via a chief public
policy and regulatory officer report. Relevant contents from the
monthly report are then reported to the board in the group
chief executive’s report.
As noted on page 26, Vector’s greenhouse gas emissions
reduction target was developed by thinkstep-anz, and approved
by the board in FY2021. In addition, Vector has targets for
customer outages which are set by Vector’s economic regulator,
the Commerce Commission.
Progress against Vector’s targets is monitored by Vector’s
management and integrated into performance dashboards.
Also, Vector’s management is responsible for updating the board
on performance against these targets. For example, customer
outage performance is presented to the board in an electricity
distribution networks operational board paper.
In FY2025 short-term incentive payments for Vector’s executive
and their direct reports included a component linked to Vector’s
performance against its emissions reduction, customer outage
targets, and a climate resilience target. These incentive targets
are designed and agreed by the executive team and approved
by the board at its discretion. Specific details can be found in
the metrics and targets section on page 34.
Vector’s group oversight
The Vector group risk team is responsible for Vector’s enterprise
risk management framework. Risks, including climate-related
risks and opportunities, are identified, assessed and managed
across the group in line with the enterprise risk management
framework and the group risk assessment criteria. This
approach to risk management is designed to ensure that there
is appropriate and regular board and management oversight
of material risks identified to drive informed decision-making.
Vector’s group sustainability team consults with Vector’s
business units to drive Vector’s climate change strategy. The
group sustainability team reports to the chief public policy and
regulatory officer and sets the agenda for the climate change
steering committee. Greenhouse gas emissions are accounted
for by group finance, with transitional scenario modelling
conducted by the group insights team or external consultants,
as needed.
Governance (continued)
9
StrategyRisks
GovernanceOpportunitiesMetrics
and targets
References
and Appendix
Risk
management
Integrating climate-related disclosures with wider disclosures
Vector’s climate-related disclosures are informed by and informs a suite of inter-related disclosures.
DISCLOSUREINTEGRATION
Electricity asset
management plan
The electricity asset management plan, as required by regulation, discloses Vector’s electricity asset
management policy, objectives, information, 10-year expenditure plans, and the context in which
expenditure decisions are made. Expenditure forecasts in the asset management plan are not
commitments as they are also scrutinised through appropriate internal governance processes, and are
subject to periodic regulatory approval of capital allowances before decisions are made.
Integration with climate-related disclosures: Information relevant to the risks – inability to efficiently
manage load to avoid network congestion, increase in extreme weather events, and the distributed
energy resources opportunity – is discussed in the electricity asset management plan in the context of
the electricity network managed by Vector. While scenario analysis informs the asset management plan,
the expenditure decisions disclosed do not necessarily relate to a specific scenario. This is explained in
further detail in figure 2 on page 14. Climate-related risks are not the sole driver of asset management
investment decisions.
Gas asset
management plan
The gas asset management plan, as required by regulation, discloses Vector’s gas asset management
policy, objectives, 10-year expenditure plans, and the context in which expenditure decisions are made.
Expenditure forecasts in the asset management plan are not commitments as they are also scrutinised
through appropriate internal governance processes, and are subject to periodic regulatory approval of
capital allowances before decisions are made.
Integration with climate-related disclosures: Gas transition risk is discussed in the gas asset management
plan. While scenario analysis informs the asset management plan, the investment decisions disclosed
do not relate to a specific scenario - rather, they are investments tested against those scenarios to deliver
a prudent asset management strategy. This is explained in further detail in figure 2 on page 14. Climate-
related risks are not the sole driver of asset management investment decisions.
Greenhouse gas
emissions inventory
report
Discloses Vector’s greenhouse gas emissions, methodology, assumptions, and emissions reduction initiatives.
Integration with climate-related disclosures: The greenhouse gas emissions accounting and target are
expressed in the greenhouse gas emissions inventory report and feed into the metrics and targets section
of the climate-related disclosures.
Vector annual
report, interim
report, and
operational
performance
updates
Discloses financial and operational information at a group level.
Integration with climate-related disclosures: Operational statistics disclosed in the operational performance
update inform the metrics and targets section of the climate-related disclosures. Some information from
the climate-related disclosures, and greenhouse gas emissions inventory report is repeated in the annual
report so that fair and accurate information is available to readers of the annual report.
Electricity and
gas distribution
information
disclosures
Annual disclosures of historical financial and non-financial performance, in accordance with regulatory
information disclosure requirements.
Integration with climate-related disclosures: Metrics disclosed here inform the metrics and targets section
of the climate-related disclosures.
Electricity and gas
distribution price
quality statements
Annual assessment of performance against price path and quality standards, in accordance with
distribution services regulatory price/quality path requirements.
Integration with climate-related disclosures: Metrics disclosed here inform the metrics and targets section
of the climate-related disclosures.
Governance (continued)
10Vector climate-related disclosures 2025
StrategyRisksOpportunitiesMetrics
and targets
References
and Appendix
Risk
management
Governance
Strategy
Vector’s transition plan
Transition planning has been a key aspect of Vector’s Symphony strategy. Symphony aims to use digital technologies, and tools such
as demand-side orchestration, to more efficiently manage the electrification during the low-carbon transition. Our strategic response
to climate-related risks and opportunities has evolved alongside our understanding of those risks and how they are likely to impact
Vector. The table below contains a summary of the transition plan aspects of Vector’s strategy, describing how we plan to respond to
our material climate-related risks and opportunities and position Vector as the economy transitions towards a low-emissions, climate-
resilient future state. Further details of Vector’s business strategy, including key assumptions and barriers, can be found under each
disclosed risk and opportunity.
STRATEGIC PRIORITYCURRENT ACTIONS
LINK TO RISK/
OPPORTUNITY
Enabling the
electrification of
Auckland
Orchestrating distributed energy resources such as electric bus charging to
reduce the need for additional infrastructure spending.
Developing and deploying digital systems, integration protocols, cyber security,
and data platforms that support the development and operation of demand-
side orchestration.
Enhancing monitoring of the low voltage network to optimise infrastructure
utilisation.
Actively engaging to influence regulatory and policy settings and standards such
as regulated standards for smart electric vehicle chargers.
Actively engaging with customers to build our understanding of preferences and
behaviours, and working with retailers to evolve their offerings that influence how
and when customers use the network.
RISK 1:
inability to
efficiently
manage load to
avoid network
congestion
OPPORTUNITY 2:
distributed
energy resources
Mitigating
stranding risk of gas
distribution network
Actively engaging with government and regulators for a managed gas transition
to recover potential stranded value.
Reviewing and replacing some capital expenditure (such as pipe replacement at
end of life) with operational expenditure (like active pipe monitoring).
Understanding customer needs, cost concerns and attitudes related to
natural gas.
RISK 2:
gas transition
Improving climate
resilience
Modelling weather impacts on Vector assets from floods, wind, landslip, fire
and cyclones.
Analysing weather models over current assets to understand asset-specific risk.
Developing projects to mitigate risk with allocated capital expenditure.
Establishing a resilience cost curve framework to prioritise resilience projects.
Surveying customers to understand their priorities and solutions to
strengthen resilience.
RISK 3:
increase in
extreme weather
events
Enabling the
digitalisation of
energy
Further developing Diverge, an energy data management software platform
for the collection, processing, storage and delivery of smart meter and related
energy data insights.
Developing strategic partnerships, such as our partnership with Tapestry, the
energy moonshot at X (Google’s innovation lab) to enable smart electricity
networks to benefit customers.
OPPORTUNITY 1:
energy platforms
Decarbonising our
operations
Setting a target to reduce Scope 1 and 2 emissions by 53.5% from our FY2020
base year (excluding electricity distribution losses).
Developing a marginal carbon cost abatement curve to prioritise
decarbonisation projects.
Not linked to a material
risk or opportunity, but is
consistent with Vector’s
Symphony strategy to help
navigate and shape the
energy transition
2
UNDERPINNED BY VECTOR’S GROUP-LEVEL SYMPHONY STRATEGY
Information regarding the extent to which transition plan aspects of Vector’s strategy are aligned with internal capital deployment
and funding decision-making processes can be found in each risk/opportunity section later in this document. With respect to
‘decarbonising our operations’, please refer to the marginal carbon cost abatement curve on page 29.
2. Decarbonising our operations is strategically important as it aligns with global efforts to limit warming to 1.5C.
However there is no risk or opportunity linked to this priority as it does not meet our materiality thresholds.
R
R
O
O
R
11
Risks
OpportunitiesMetrics
and targets
References
and Appendix
Risk
management
StrategyGovernance
ORDERLY DECARBONISATION
DISORDERLY DECARBONISATION
HOTHOUSE
Our approach to asset management
As a regulated entity, Vector publishes detailed 10-year electricity
and gas asset management plans, available here [3,4]. These
plans detail our prudent asset management strategy, and are
informed by asset management specific scenario modelling – see
figure 2 on page 14. While climate-related risks are an input into
asset management planning, these are collectively one of the
many risks that are considered.
Our approach to using climate scenarios
Vector developed three group climate scenarios, as outlined in
the adjacent table, which adapt data from the Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Assessment Report Six [5] for
physical analysis, and the Network for Greening the Financial
System (NGFS) [6] (an international network of central banks
and supervisory authorities including the Reserve Bank of
New Zealand) for transitional analysis. We consider that the IPCC
scenarios [5] are best suited for New Zealand physical risk impact
analysis because of their data availability. Likewise, we consider
that the NGFS scenarios are relevant to Vector’s assessments as
they capture the customer burden on an unmanaged transition.
These group scenarios were initially developed by Vector’s
management, informed by existing scenario modelling for asset
management, globally recognised scenarios, and engagement
with the wider electricity distribution and transmission sector
in New Zealand. The scenarios were revisited in FY2025 and
were considered to remain plausible and appropriate future
pathways that are fit for purpose. However, we note that, from
a global context, both the SSP5-8.5 ‘hothouse scenario’ and
SSP1-1.9 ‘orderly 1.5°C scenario’ are being re-examined and these
may be updated in future disclosures with oversight from our
climate change steering committee and board audit committee.
Because these updates are related to physical impacts, they
will affect physical climate change modelling, but they are not
expected to have impact on the underlying process to identify
material climate-related risks and opportunities. Vector does
not include carbon removals/sequestration in its underlying
scenario assumptions.
Vector worked with the wider New Zealand energy sector to
align on scenarios. This work was finalised in June 2024 and we
may consider this in our scenarios and scenario modelling in the
future. This may result in changes to our strategy, and risk and
opportunity assessments. We have not yet integrated the wider
energy sector scenarios as it will take some time to update our
numerous models.
Select assumptions of the group scenario narratives are used in
scenario modelling as relevant to the appropriate Vector business
unit. For example, when modelling future electricity load we
consider inputs such as electric vehicle uptake, demand-side
control, energy efficiency, and gas to electricity switching, but
do not include others, like temperature forecasts. Similarly when
modelling the future gas network we include assumptions
such as the regulatory settings around gas networks, but do
not include physical climate change impacts or the transitional
impacts of the electricity network. The relationship between
scenarios and modelling is detailed in figure 2. There is no
model that combines all assumptions presented in the
scenarios narratives.
Orderly decarbonisation
• Limits global average temperature to 1.5ºC
warmer by 2100 (RCP 1.9)
• Net zero by 2050 in New Zealand and globally
• Transition includes uptake of digital platforms
for demand-side management
• Rapid electrification managed through
demand response
• Regulations aligned with decarbonisation,
and pricing models that manage whole-of-
system costs
• Ongoing efforts with energy efficiency to
reduce demand
• Managed transition away from fossil fuel gas
• SSP 1-1.9
Disorderly
decarbonisation
• Global average temperature 2.7ºC warmer
by 2100 (RCP 4.5)
• New Zealand still achieves net zero by 2050 but
via a disorderly transition
• World maintains current emissions until 2050
and net zero by 2100
• Transition focuses on large-scale renewable
supply with no demand side or digitalisation
• Rapid unmanaged electrification
• Regulations lag decarbonisation efforts and
create barriers to efficient decarbonisation
• Customers bear the cost of an expensive
unmanaged transition
• Unmanaged transition from fossil fuel gas
• SSP 2-4.5
Hothouse
• Global average temperature 4.4ºC warmer by 2100
(RCP 8.5)
• Emissions triple by 2075
• Policies revert New Zealand to the fossil fuel era
• Customers bear the cost of expensive fossil
fuel energy
• Regulations block decarbonisation spending
• SSP 5-8.5
Strategy (continued)
12Vector climate-related disclosures 2025
GovernanceStrategyRisksOpportunitiesMetrics
and targets
References
and Appendix
Risk
management
ORDERLY DECARBONISATION
DISORDERLY DECARBONISATION
HOTHOUSE
Under the orderly decarbonisation scenario, the world shifts
gradually but pervasively towards decarbonisation. This scenario
describes a future where global net-zero emissions are reached
by 2050, and global temperatures peak around 1.6ºC by 2050 and
then decline to 1.4ºC by 2100. This prevents the most extreme
predicted impacts of climate change (which are described in
the hothouse scenario below). However, this scenario will still
result in an increase in extreme weather impacts including
flooding, increased heavy wind events, land erosion and increased
sustained hot and dry weather.
For New Zealand, the orderly decarbonisation scenario describes
a future where domestic actions and policies are consistently
aimed at achieving net-zero domestic emissions by 2050. This
scenario sees actions and policies providing for clear and early
decarbonisation actions that integrate a whole-of-system
approach, including both the supply side and demand side of the
energy system.
In relation to the electricity sector, the orderly decarbonisation
scenario’s future provides for the New Zealand electricity grid
supplying near to 100% renewable electricity by 2050. It also
assumes regulatory settings that incentivise and prioritise
demand-side energy management solutions, distributed
generation, and energy-efficiency measures, which allow the
energy sector to manage electrification and renewable generation
while avoiding substantial increases in network congestion. In
particular, this demand-side participation by energy customers
optimises the use of the existing physical electricity distribution
network to reduce inefficient capital expenditure and assumes
regulatory settings that optimise the wholesale market to
leverage the low cost of renewable power. The combined effect
keeps electricity prices low, and therefore enables an easier
transition from fossil fuels to electricity.
Globally the need for higher-quality energy data, digital platforms,
and energy analytics increases as more electric vehicles and
distributed renewable generation enter the electricity system.
With respect to the natural gas sector, the orderly decarbonisation
scenario describes a future where gas supply networks undergo
a managed transition from fossil gas in response to reduced gas
usage. This means that capital asset costs associated with existing
gas transmission and distribution assets are recovered through
early regulatory and policy changes, thereby minimising future
customer impacts as costs are recovered over a larger current
customer base.
Under the disorderly decarbonisation scenario, the world follows
a decarbonisation pathway whereby emission trends do not shift
markedly from historical patterns, with some countries making
relatively good progress while others fall short. CO
2
emissions are
expected to remain at current levels until approximately 2050 and
then fall by 2100 causing global temperatures to reach 2.0ºC by
2050, and 2.7ºC by 2100.
Consequently, with respect to physical risks of climate change,
the increased temperatures that are assumed to occur under
the disorderly decarbonisation scenario (when compared to the
orderly decarbonisation scenario) would cause more significant
weather impacts to be felt in New Zealand. These weather impacts
include physical risks to Vector’s physical assets, including our
electricity assets in particular.
In regards to transition risks, under the disorderly decarbonisation
scenario New Zealand achieves its net-zero emissions target
by 2050. However, policy measures in the lead up to 2030 lack
cohesion and the failure to coordinate policy stringency across
sectors results in inefficient capital investments.
In the electricity sector, this delay and incoherent policy approach
results in a high cost burden on energy customers (because of
inefficient investment in physical electricity assets to respond to
higher peak energy demands), and creates energy reliability issues.
Under the disorderly decarbonisation scenario, decarbonisation
policies focus on supply-side policies which enable new large-
scale renewable electricity generation and support the rapid
electrification of transportation. The absence of demand-side
management of electric vehicle charging and industry electricity
demands results in high network congestion, needing large
infrastructural upgrades with costs largely passed on to customers.
This could result in intervention by regulators and/ or government
- therefore impacting the approval of capital allowances.
The absence of demand-side management also limits customers’
abilities to leverage technology to reduce consumption at peak
periods, increasing the strain on the wholesale market and
dependence on large-scale backup generation. This failure to
realise opportunities to reduce overall energy costs through
system efficiencies results in high electricity prices. Such high
electricity prices not only intensify energy affordability issues
but also create dependency on government subsidies and high
carbon prices to achieve the 2050 targets.
In relation to the natural gas sector, the disorderly decarbonisation
scenario presumes that gas customers take and act on the view
that the long term (between 2040 - 2050) operation of piped
gas is not viable. This leads to a wind-down without regulatory or
policy intervention to preserve cost recovery leading to an increase
in cost recovery risks. In addition, gas customers face their own
stranded asset risk.
The hothouse scenario describes a future where minimal and
fragmented efforts towards climate change mitigation have
resulted in severely increased physical impacts.
Under this scenario, the rest of the world prioritises economic
and social development over decarbonisation efforts leading
to the exploitation of fossil fuel resources. As a result, under the
hothouse scenario GHG emissions triple by 2075 and global
temperatures reach 2.4ºC by 2050 and 4.4ºC by 2100.
With respect to physical risks, there would be a significant
increase in extreme weather events leading to expensive climate
change adaptation measures and low grid reliability.
Regarding transition risks, this scenario represents a future
where there is no or minimal action towards domestic
and global emissions targets. Regulations form barriers to
decarbonisation spending, and policy incentives to facilitate
faster carbon reductions are ineffective or absent. Customers
continue to bear the cost of fossil fuel energy and ongoing
climate change adaptation.
In relation to the natural gas sector, the hothouse scenario
assumes a continuation of fossil fuels such as natural gas and
LPG beyond 2050. Likewise, the electricity network only sees a
low and manageable uptake of electric vehicles through to 2080.
Strategy (continued)
13
Risks
OpportunitiesMetrics
and targets
References
and Appendix
Risk
management
StrategyGovernance
Scenarios represent plausible descriptions of how the future may
develop based on a set of assumptions, including both physical
and transitional climate-related risks in an integrated manner.
Scenarios are used to prepare for uncertain future impacts
of climate change and test the resilience of Vector’s business
model and the Symphony strategy. Scenarios are not intended
to be probabilistic or determinative of climate change. Future
group scenarios may also change in time, given the significant
interconnection with government and regulatory decisions.
Vector’s scenario analysis covers the group and all subsidiaries.
The chosen scenarios are appropriate to Vector as they allow
us to assess the resilience of our business strategy against
different potential futures that could emerge as part of the
energy transition.
As explained above, Vector’s scenario modelling informs our
strategy including our gas and electricity asset management.
Figure 2: Interconnection of Vector’s modelling with overarching climate scenarios
Electricity network:
- Net-zero emissions by 2050 in NZ
- Includes uptake of digital platforms
and demand-side management
- Rapid electrification managed
through demand response
Gas network:
- Managed transition from fossil gas
Physical:
- 1.5°C global warming by 2100
- SSP 1-1.9
ORDERLY DECARBONISATION
Electricity Network:
- Net-zero emissions by 2050 in NZ
- No demand side or digitalisation
- Rapid unmanaged electrification
Gas Network:
- Unmanaged transition from
fossil gas
Physical:
- 2.7°C global warming by 2100
- SSP 2-4.5
DISORDERLY DECARBONISATION
- Minimal and fragmented efforts
towards climate change mitigation
Physical:
- 4.4
°C global warming by 2100
- SSP 5-8.5
HOTHOUSE
Load forecast of electricity
distribution network.
Assumptions include:
- Customer growth
- Energy efficiency
- Solar/battery
- Electric vehicles
- Hot water control
- Gas to electricity
substitution
- Demand-side control
CUSTOMER SCENARIO
MODEL
Load forecast of the gas
distribution network to
2031.
Assumptions include:
- Reduction in gas
volumes
- No government or
regulatory support/
transition plan
GAS CUSTOMER
SCENARIO MODELLING
Electricity asset
management plan
- Fire risk (based on
short-term forecasts)
- Landslip (not yet
including future
precipitation scenarios)
- Cyclone risk
STAND-ALONE
PHYSICAL MODELS
Electricity asset
management plan
Not yet in electricity
asset management plan
Gas asset
management plan
Assumptions include:
- Gas wind-down by 2050
- No government or
regulatory support/
transition plan
INDUSTRY WORKING
GROUP - GAS
TRANSITION MODELLING
- Flooding
- Wind
- Coastal inundation
SCENARIO-LINKED
PHYSICAL MODELS
Vector engagement
with government and
regulators
Physical ModellingTransitional ModellingGroup Scenarios
Strategy (continued)
14Vector climate-related disclosures 2025
GovernanceStrategyRisksOpportunitiesMetrics
and targets
References
and Appendix
Risk
management
Physical impacts modelling
Drawing on our group scenarios, Vector conducts detailed
physical modelling of both acute and chronic impacts.
Physical climate modelling highlights that electrical assets
in the Auckland region are exposed to the various physical
impacts of climate change. Assessment and management of
physical risks on Vector’s electricity distribution network have
therefore been a focus.
In FY2022 Vector began assessing specific physical risks on our
electrical infrastructure assets. We did so by prioritising those
risks with the highest expected impact, being: risks associated
with higher wind-speed, flooding, landslip, fire, and ground
temperature increases. In FY2022 Vector commissioned
ClimSystems to conduct extreme wind analysis, and analyse
coastal inundation.
In FY2023 freshwater flood analysis was conducted, and in
FY2024 the flood models were improved to include flood
depth. The flood modelling results were mapped against
our electricity zone substations. In FY2025 the models were
updated to include even more infrequent, high-impact events
such as 1–500 year and 1–1000 year probabilities.
In FY2024 the University of Auckland’s Department of Civil
and Environmental Engineering conducted a land instability
assessment in relation to our overhead electricity assets.
Geospatial landslip risk maps were then mapped against
Vector’s overhead asset base to understand asset susceptibility
to landslips.
We worked closely with Earth Sciences NZ (formerly NIWA)
and Fire and Emergency New Zealand to conduct a dry year
and associated fire zone analysis for the electricity distribution
network for the subsequent summer.
Vector engaged with international electricity distribution
companies, including Florida Power & Light Company and
San Diego Gas & Electric, to help us understand and prepare
for the impacts of extreme weather events. In the case of
Florida Power & Light, this was in response to the growing
frequency and severity of cyclones, to learn more about how
they were managing their adaptation, while the work with
San Diego Gas & Electric was around how they managed their
wildfire risk.
In FY2025 Vector commissioned Earth Sciences NZ (formerly
NIWA) to explore plausible outcomes for the Auckland region
if Ex-Tropical Cyclone Gabrielle had taken a different track and
directly impacted Auckland as opposed to Hawke’s Bay. Initial
analysis highlights that the heaviest rainfall that occurred with
the actual Gabrielle event in Hawke’s Bay was now happening
over the Coromandel and Kaimai Ranges, in effect placing
Auckland in a rain-shadow region, therefore lessening the
impact. Most parts of Auckland still received around 100mm of
rainfall, and work is underway to process this data for analysis
against our assets.
Physical climate-change impact modelling is part of our
scenario analysis and informs Vector’s climate change
strategy via the asset management process and informs
the engineering and design process for works on existing
assets. For example, we have developed an approach to
Strategy (continued)
flood abatement over zone substations within flood-risk zones
and integrated those expenditures within our electricity asset
management plan. These include activities such as the raising of
assets above flood plain levels, or relocating the assets altogether.
There is usually a time-lag between Vector’s climate modelling/
analysis, and asset management processes. For example, once
an asset is identified as having a potential vulnerability, detailed
modelling and engineering studies are often required before
appropriate action can be put forward. Note that the proposed
mitigation actions in the asset management plan are not a
commitment to spend, and also require periodic regulatory
funding decisions from Vector’s economic regulator, the
Commerce Commission.
Transitional impacts modelling
The Climate Change Commission has highlighted that
electrification will be key to the decarbonisation of New Zealand’s
economy [7]. Transitional aspects of Vector’s group climate
scenarios have been selected to identify the boundary conditions
for infrastructural demand. The scenarios help us to focus on the
strategies that can better utilise existing infrastructure - such as
regulated standards for smart electric vehicle charging, which
informs our position on wider policy and regulations concerning
the electrification transition.
Through our scenario modelling, we consider elements of
both an orderly and disorderly transition to help us understand
future demand. For example, modelling of peak load under
the disorderly decarbonisation scenario assumes misaligned
management of customer assets and appliances, resulting in
the greatest peak demand. The converse is true of the orderly
decarbonisation scenario, where peak load is minimised – such as
for example through the integration of smart digital platforms,
network visibility, the alignment of customer incentives, and
demand side orchestration of customer assets.
An example of this would be electric vehicle uptake. In
a disorderly scenario, we model a greater proportion of
unmanaged electric vehicles charging during peak periods,
which ultimately increases the capacity requirements on the
network. In an orderly scenario, demand-side orchestration
results in fewer electric vehicles being charged at peak times.
This scenario modelling has been considered within Vector’s
strategy processes including the electricity asset management
plan, which presents a detailed discussion on network growth
and security in chapter 10 [3].
Transition risks to Vector’s gas network were modelled in FY2023
as part of the wider Gas Industry Futures Working Group – a
collaboration of gas distribution and transmission companies in
New Zealand. We model the disorderly transition scenario as it
relates to gas, which presumes a 2050 network wind-down with
no regulatory or policy intervention. This is appropriate to analyse
given the significant potential asset cost recovery risks. In FY2025
Vector divided the disorderly scenario of gas into three further
sub-scenarios to test different plausible customer trends of the
disorderly scenario.
15
Risks
OpportunitiesMetrics
and targets
References
and Appendix
Risk
management
StrategyGovernance
Limitations of scenario modelling
As noted on page 3, climate-related risk management, and
scenario modelling in particular, is an emerging area, and
often relies on data and methodologies that are developing
and uncertain.
By way of example, our flood modelling is largely dependent
on precipitation forecasts, pre-storm water levels, elevation
topology based on light detection and ranging (LiDAR) scans,
ground surface roughness and infiltration. The elevation topology
represents a ‘bare earth’ model and therefore does not take into
account buildings or subsurface stormwater reticulation.
Our wind modelling does not have spatial resolution, and
therefore is not geospatially integrated into our asset analysis.
This limits our ability to incorporate wind models into targeted
asset planning.
In addition, our landslip modelling does not take into account
the impacts of future precipitation.
Vector’s transitional scenario modelling on the electricity
network is also limited. For example, it only includes transitional
customer impacts, such as electric vehicle uptake, industrial
decarbonisation, new point loads, population growth, demand
response, solar/battery uptake, and energy efficiency. It does not
consider how the physical impacts of climate change (such as
temperature change) may impact customer energy demand in
the future.
We exclude the hothouse scenario in our transitional scenario
modelling as this assumes there is no transition and therefore is
an immaterial transitional impact. Hothouse is still modelled in
our physical scenario analysis.
In addition, gas network scenario models are highly sensitive to
the current and future policy and regulatory framework, future
gas prices, availability, and customer sentiment towards fossil
fuels. These regulatory settings, market conditions, and policy
settings are not yet clear and therefore our assumptions may
prove incorrect.
Value chain
In considering Vector’s exposure to climate-related risks and
opportunities, we have also taken into account the exposure of
our value chain. As part of that assessment, we have defined our
value chain as encompassing Vector’s 50% share in Bluecurrent
(formerly known as Vector Metering). It provides smart electricity
and gas meters, and related data services. Bluecurrent operates
in Australia and New Zealand.
We have also assessed upstream risks by including consideration
of climate-related risk exposure of some of our tier 1 suppliers but
have excluded tier 2 and 3 suppliers (for example, copper mining
suppliers) because of the current difficulty in analysing such a
large and complex supply chain.
Impacts on downstream customers, such as the cost of
gas appliance conversions and gas costs, are considered.
They are relevant to our assessment of climate-related risks
and opportunities.
We have also begun exploring the intersectionality between
critical infrastructure providers as part of our value chain analysis.
In FY2025 we initiated a collaboration with Auckland Transport to
analyse Vector’s ability to access critical electrical infrastructure
in a flood event.
Current transitional impacts
Vector is already observing growth in electric vehicles and
industrial decarbonisation in the Auckland region, which impacts
the load on Vector’s electricity distribution network. We are also
observing indirect transitional impacts, such as the anticipated
rapid growth of data centres in the Auckland region. While not
directly attributed to climate change, many data companies
are drawn to New Zealand because of its high renewable
electricity supply and competitive energy costs compared to
other OECD countries.
Although electricity system growth is reflected in our electricity
asset management plan - [3], it is not possible to attribute these
financial variances specifically to climate change. For example,
while growth is driven in part by electrification, it is also driven by
housing development, and changes in industrial behaviour.
It is important to note that the current increases in Vector’s
electricity distribution network pricing are largely influenced by
an increase in the weighted average cost of capital, rather than
an increase in infrastructure expenditure.
Vector has also developed Diverge, an energy data management
software platform for the collection, processing, storage and
delivery of smart meter data and its related insights. Our
electricity distribution network uses Diverge for ingesting and
storing smart meter and related energy data which can be
used to increase visibility of customer demand on Vector’s low-
voltage network.
The Ministry of Business, Innovation, and Employment (MBIE)
have indicated that gas supply is reducing faster and sooner
than previously forecast based on their most recent petroleum
reserves data (January 2025) [8]. The ministry’s expected proven
and probable future natural gas production from 1 January 2025
onwards dropped from 1,166PJ in 2024 to 960PJ in 2025, an 18%
reduction. Natural gas distributed volumes on the Vector network
have declined from 14.4PJ in FY2019 to 11.9PJ in FY2025.
In 2022 the Commerce Commission implemented accelerated
depreciation from the start of the third default price/quality path
commencing on 1 October 2022. Shortening asset life can reduce
the risk of economic network stranding. Vector is currently
engaging with the Commerce Commission on the next price
path reset, and highlights that more focus is required to manage
stranding risk to preserve incentives to invest and ensure
remaining customers are not burdened with material price rises
in later years. For more information, see risk 2: gas transition.
In FY2025 Vector recognised an impairment loss of $37 million
in regard to goodwill allocated to the gas distribution business.
The impairment was recognised following due consideration
of updated forecasts in our gas asset management plan. These
forecasts show a decline in net connections to the gas network
from FY2026, and the overall gas volume continuing to decline,
but at a faster rate than in prior years. This follows a FY2024
goodwill impairment of $60 million. Following the impairment,
the carrying value of the gas distribution business is consistent
with the estimated value of the regulated asset base.
Strategy (continued)
16Vector climate-related disclosures 2025
GovernanceStrategyRisksOpportunitiesMetrics
and targets
References
and Appendix
Risk
management
Strategy (continued)
Current physical impacts
In recent years, including FY2025, Vector’s electricity network
has been impacted by extreme weather events. These include:
High wind-speeds, storms and cyclonic events: Responsible
for power outages, largely through vegetation falling on Vector’s
electricity distribution network, and related repair costs.
Flooding: Resulting in flood damage, asset relocation costs,
operational costs to disconnect and reconnect power for the
safety of our customers, and geo-technical instability leading
to landslips and increased vegetation fall.
In FY2025 Cyclone Tam followed by a thunderstorm caused
about 1,600 low-voltage faults, and 231 high-voltage faults
resulting in over 79,000 customers losing power. The latest
estimate is that the associated costs to Vector for electricity
maintenance as a result of Cyclone Tam resulted in a cost of
approximately $1.7 million.
For interest, the FY2023 Auckland Anniversary floods and
Cyclone Gabrielle resulted in a cost of $17.1 million.
Hot and dry weather: Reducing current capacity in electricity
assets and increasing the risk of electrical equipment failing or
causing wildfires.
Vector’s material risks and opportunities
From our scenario analysis, we have identified three risks and
two opportunities. Their mapping against our scenarios are
highlighted in figure 3, and expanded on the subsequent pages.
Orderly
decarbonisation
Disorderly
decarbonisation
Hothouse
1. Energy platforms
2. Distributed energy resources
1. Inability to efficiently manage
load to avoid network congestion
2. Gas transition
3. Increase in extreme
weather events
OPPORTUNITIES
RISKS
R
O
Figure 3: Mapping of scenarios to Vector’s risks and opportunities
17
Risks
OpportunitiesMetrics
and targets
References
and Appendix
Risk
management
StrategyGovernance
RISK 1:
Inability to efficiently manage load
to avoid network congestion
Risk description
Key scenario: disorderly decarbonisation
Type: transitional – policy risk
Sector: electricity distribution network
Geography: Auckland
In a disorderly decarbonisation scenario, an absence of
timely policy, regulatory and market changes results
in customer peak demand increasing faster than
average annual usage. Subject to network response and
planning, two different future scenarios may emerge:
a) a highly congested network with network
connection queues and reliability challenges; or
b) a strong increase in physical network investment
leading to affordability challenges for customers.
Time period
Long term: 10 – 30 years
‒ Direct integration of distributed energy resources, and their
management systems, with our network management
systems. An example of this could be a dynamic operating
envelope which could provide network limits to retailers’
systems in real-time in response to electricity constraints on
the network
‒ Enabling digital systems, integration protocols, cyber security,
and data platforms
‒ Visibility of the low-voltage network, including distribution
transformer and distributed energy resource visibility for more
efficient planning
‒ Active engagement for regulatory and policy settings and
standards such as regulated standards for smart electric
vehicle chargers
‒ Network modernisation to support whole-of-system planning,
distributed energy resource integration and detection
‒ Active customer engagement to build our understanding
of preferences and behaviours, and working with retailers to
evolve their offering that influence how and when customers
use the network.
These initiatives are incorporated into Vector’s internal capital
deployment and funding decision-making processes through
our electricity asset management plan [3].
Examples of actions to date that support Vector’s risk
management strategy include:
‒ Using data and insights from our gas network to inform
electricity demand forecast from gas to electricity switching
‒ Building capability to on-board large customers onto
Vector’s distributed energy resource management system
for demand response which can minimise the capital cost
for those customers
‒ Further developing Diverge, an energy data management
software platform for the collection, processing, storage and
delivery of smart meter data and related insights
‒ Increasing low-voltage network visibility via the aggregation
of existing smart meter data to understand remaining low-
voltage headroom
‒ Developing a load management protocol with retailers
operating customer devices, and introducing a commercial
distributed energy resource tariff to enable more efficient use
of existing network capacity by commercial customers with
flexible loads
‒ Building solutions using bespoke services, co-developed
between Vector Technology Solutions and AWS
‒ Working with Tapestry, the energy moonshot at X (Google’s
innovation lab) as one of a select group of global partners,
collaborating on the next generation of platforms for network
management. For more details, see opportunity 1: energy
platforms on page 21.
Changes to this strategy may emerge in response to regulatory,
technology and market changes, scientific developments, and
customer preferences.
Anticipated impacts
Scenario modelling highlights that under a disorderly
decarbonisation scenario the growth over the next 30 years
would result in a substantially stronger increase in peak demand
compared to an annual increase in consumption on Vector’s
network. Under this disorderly scenario, the absence of demand-
side orchestration leads to two fundamental issues as described
in the risk section above:
If network investment is lagging demand because of
unanticipated rapid peak demand growth, the network will
be increasingly congested and new connections queues will
become increasingly long. If prolonged and at scale, this could
lead to customer outages, slow down economic growth and limit
decarbonisation efforts.
Conversely, if traditional network investment is significantly
ahead of demand growth or caters to an increasingly high peak
demand, it may lead to a strong build-out of physical network
infrastructure that locks in cost and lacks flexibility.
Both issues may pose risks such as higher customer costs
and economic slowdown. This could result in intervention by
regulators and/or government, impacting the return on the
deployed assets and reputational loss.
Vector’s risk management strategy
Vector’s strategy to manage this risk over the medium-term
period to 2035 involves the effective demand-side orchestration
of distributed energy resources (such as electric vehicles and hot
water), and the deployment of non-wires alternatives to smooth
load profiles. This includes increasing our ability and capability to
manage these distributed energy resources (either ourselves, or
through third parties), and the alignment of market, regulatory
and policy settings to support and enable this. Also included
is the management of loads during critical events, such as a
network or grid emergency, to ensure electricity system stability.
To defer investment in traditional infrastructure and manage
the network securely, Vector needs certainty that customers’
demand will be shifted outside peak periods. At a high level,
delivery of our Symphony strategy to address this risk involves:
R
18Vector climate-related disclosures 2025
GovernanceStrategyRisksOpportunitiesMetrics
and targets
References
and Appendix
Risk
management
RISK 2:
Gas transition
Risk description
Key scenario: disorderly decarbonisation
Type: transitional – policy risk, market risk
Sector: gas
Geography: Auckland
An absence of timely policy and regulatory decisions on
the gas transition, combined with upstream gas supply
shortages gives rise to a disorderly decarbonisation
scenario, where gas infrastructure companies and their
connected customers are potentially exposed to material
transition costs, disruption and gas-asset stranding risk.
Time period
Short term: 0 – 5 years
Medium term: 5 – 10 years
Long term: 10 – 30 years
‒ Requiring 100% customer contributions for new gas connections
and associated network growth costs.
In FY2025 Vector began engagement with the Commerce
Commission in relation to the upcoming price path reset. This
is a regulatory framework that determines the maximum revenues of
gas distribution networks over the next period from 1 October 2026.
Vector has proposed that the Commission:
‒ Moves the form of control from a weighted average price cap to a
revenue cap
‒ Agrees that the regulated asset base should not be indexed to
inflation to avoid increasing stranding risk
‒ Implements a more aggressive approach to mitigating stranding
risk to ensure more asset value is recovered over the current larger
customer base
‒Updates the assumptions in its asset stranding model to further
accelerate depreciation
‒ Creates a step up in operational expenditure allowances to support
the transition of some capital expenditure to operational expenditure
‒ Clarifies its view on how decommissioning costs should be treated
under the regulatory framework.
Examples of actions taken by Vector as part of this strategy to reduce
capital recovery risk to date include:
‒ Informing both government and regulators as to the criticality of
preserving the principle of regulated investment cost recovery. An
example of this is Vector’s paper to government on ‘Managing the
gas transition – options preserving solutions to manage customer
risks from gas asset stranding’ in FY2024 [9]
‒Proposing that the Commerce Commission implements
accelerated depreciation from the start of the third default price/
quality path commencing 1 October 2022
‒ Requiring 100% customer contributions for new gas connections
and associated network growth costs as of 1 October 2022
‒ Not proceeding with some previously forecast capital projects,
such as future-proofing ducting
‒ Reducing system growth to zero in the RY2025 gas asset
management plan
‒ Forming the Gas Infrastructure Future Working Group alongside
Clarus and Powerco, after engagement with the Ministry of
Business Innovation and Employment. The purpose was to
explore scenarios for the end-state and transition options for gas
infrastructure [10].
This risk serves as an input into Vector’s financial planning process
via our gas network asset management plan [4]. It is important to
note that it is not possible to deploy additional capital to manage
this risk. Rather, the risk is being managed by reducing capital
expenditure where safely possible to reduce exposure to further asset
stranding risk. For example, in FY2021 the gas asset management
plan had a 10-year forecast of net capital expenditure of $86 million
(inflated to forecast 2026 dollars). In Vector’s most recent gas asset
management plan the 10-year forecast of net capital expenditure has
dropped to $43 million (inflated to forecast 2026 dollars) – which has
been partially offset through higher operational maintenance costs.
Note that the gas asset management plan discloses gross capex
which includes customer connections and asset relocations which
do not contribute to stranding risk as they are largely funded by the
customer. We chose, therefore, to disclose net capex here as this is the
portion attributed to stranding risk.
Because of the significant impact of evolving markets and
government policy, updates to this risk, relevant scenarios, and
strategy may need to be considered in future years’ climate-related
disclosures and asset management plans.
Anticipated impact
There is uncertainty over the future asset life utilisation (capacity
and longevity) of gas networks. This is driven by New Zealand’s
targets for net-zero carbon emissions by 2050, combined with a
shortage of upstream gas supply, declining gas consumption, and
inconsistent government policy direction to adequately manage the
transition. Under the disorderly decarbonisation scenario, there is a
risk that the government or regulator doesn’t honour the principle
of regulated investment cost recovery. This introduces a stranded
asset risk whereby investment recovery is not achieved over the long
term. This may also lead to further impairments of the value of the
gas business.
Vector has already experienced a 17% decline in gas volumes since
2019, and our medium-term scenario modelling under the disorderly
transition highlights that this trend will continue. This is driven by a
combination of numerous factors which include decarbonisation,
gas scarcity, and business closure or relocation from Auckland.
Vector’s risk management strategy
Vector’s short-term cash-flow risk is because of the Commerce
Commission’s approach to using a weighted average price cap,
which incentivises gas distribution companies like Vector to grow gas
demand – and therefore financially penalises gas distributors if gas
volumes are lower than the Commerce Commission’s forecasts. We
have proposed that New Zealand follows the approach of the UK, which
uses a revenue cap whereby our revenue is determined regardless of
how much gas is conveyed. Vector has also been moving our pricing
to fixed charges, which mitigates some short-term volume decline.
Mitigating long-term capital recovery risk requires action by
regulators to make timely changes that accelerate the recovery
of capital from current customers before an increased rate of
disconnections puts that capital recovery at risk.
Vector’s approach to mitigating gas stranding risk focuses on:
‒ Advocating for regulatory intervention to accelerate
depreciation of gas assets
‒ Seeking regulatory allowances for end-of-life treatment
of the gas network, such as decommissioning
‒ Reducing capital expenditure where safely possible to minimise
added stranded value. This includes substituting some capital
projects with operational projects.
R
19
GovernanceStrategyRisksOpportunitiesMetrics
and targets
References
and Appendix
Risk
management
RISK 3:
Increase in extreme weather events
Risk description
Key scenarios: orderly and disorderly
decarbonisation, hothouse
Type: physical – acute
Sector: electricity distribution network
Geography: Auckland
All scenarios identify an increase in extreme weather
events which is expected to cause disruption to the
Vector network in the Auckland region. These include
increasing wind-speeds, freshwater flooding, coastal
flooding, cyclonic activity, land erosion, and an increase
in sustained hot and dry weather leading to elevated
wildfire risk. These weather impacts are physical risks
to our assets, in particular our electricity distribution
infrastructure assets.
Time period
Short term: 0 – 5 years
Medium term: 5 – 10 years
Long term: 10 – 30 years
Climate modelling across all scenarios shows that the length
and severity of sustained hot and dry weather will increase too.
This, in combination with high wind-speeds, raises the risk of fire
start from Vector’s electricity distribution network under normal
operating conditions. Furthermore, warmer weather decreases
electrical asset capacity ratings.
Vector’s risk management strategy
Vector developed a risk scoring system which uses results
from climate change models, along with internal engineering
expertise. Each climate-related risk to specific assets is given
a risk score based on a set of specific criteria. Summing all our
analysed risks comes to a total risk score of 431 risk points. This
is not an exhaustive list, and more risks will be added as Vector’s
climate-change modelling continues to mature.
This risk serves as an input into Vector’s financial planning
process via our electricity asset management plan. We have
put forward approximately $300 million worth of projects for
inclusion in Vector’s FY2025 electricity asset management plan
[3]. These projects undergo further refinement beyond the
description included in the electricity asset management plan.
It is important to note that the electricity asset management
plan is not a commitment to spend, and projects will be
refined continually, for example with final tree regulations
being implemented.
Examples of projects in progress include:
‒Continuous asset monitoring and modernisation of our
planned maintenance programmes to identify potential
weaknesses early. This includes the use of aerial inspection
and development of artificial intelligence (AI) based condition
assessment in partnership with Tapestry, the energy
moonshot at X (Google’s innovation lab)
‒ Infrastructure upgrading to improve flood resilience at key
zone substations
‒ Transferring load from our highest flood-risk zone substation
so that it can be decommissioned (Ngātaringa Bay
zone substation)
‒ Reconfiguring parts of the electricity network to create
multiple pathways for power to flow (known as meshing),
and adding network automation to quickly re-route power.
In some cases, meshing can be substituted with standby
distributed generation
‒ Upgrading overhead lines with more resilient technologies
‒ Reducing the risk of the network starting a wildfire during
normal operations. Examples of risk reduction include the
implementation of seasonal ratings, use of safer fuses and the
potential to switch off reclosers on extreme-heat days
‒ The Government has announced a decision on the long-
awaited reform of the tree trimming regulations. These
changes will help us to better protect our lines from trees, and
so protect our customers’ electricity supply, however the cost
recovery challenges of tree trimming remain unaddressed in
these changes
‒ Ongoing engagement with Earth Sciences NZ (formerly
NIWA) and Fire and Emergency New Zealand for the
FY2025 summer.
Anticipated impact
All scenarios highlight an increase in extreme weather events
because of climate change compared with historical trends, with
the most severe impacts in the hothouse scenario. Key impacts
are customer outages, reputational risks and regulatory risks/
fines from those outages, public safety risks, and asset costs
(via either repair or reinforcing) to Vector’s network.
Our flood modelling scenario analysis conducted in FY2024
considered 113 zone substations out to the year 2100. It
highlighted 13 zone substations that are identified to be at
potential risk of flooding. Only certain assets (such as the control
gear) within these 13 zone substations are modelled as being
as vulnerable. A total of 15 projects have been identified to
mitigate these risks. Examples include the raising of assets above
flood levels. These projects need to be assessed through the
appropriate internal governance process for approval of capital
allowances before they can be actioned. In FY2025 we completed
one of our flood mitigation projects, reducing the number of
flood exposed zone substations to 12.
Regarding coastal inundation, only one zone substation
was identified as being at risk and is currently being
decommissioned.
Wind-speed models to the year 2100 highlight that the hours
of heavy wind-speeds per year are forecast to increase across
all scenarios. As heavy wind-speeds resulting in vegetation fall
are responsible for significant damage on the Vector network,
an increase in heavy wind-speed frequency would increase
unplanned outages resulting in additional expenditure for
network repair, and heighten the risk that Vector does not meet
our regulatory quality standards. In addition, the cascading
effects of floods with high wind-speeds can weaken the
geo-technical stability of the ground, leading to increased
tree fall, landslips and delayed network repair until the water
has subsided. Landslip susceptibility analysis from FY2025
highlighted 351 power poles in potentially very high landslip risk.
R
20Vector climate-related disclosures 2025
GovernanceStrategyRisksOpportunitiesMetrics
and targets
References
and Appendix
Risk
management
OPPORTUNITY 1:
Energy platforms
Opportunity description
Key scenario: orderly decarbonisation
Type: transitional – market, products
and services
Sector: electricity
Geography: global
In the orderly decarbonisation scenario, better access
to data and the use of intelligent digital platforms to
move loads to off-peak times would improve network
utilisation and efficiency. Advanced meters, the data
they provide and the accessibility of that data can be
used to increase network visibility, enable demand-
side management, and improve network operations,
customer service, and the innovation of new products
and services.
The need for Vector to build capability to process
large, varied datasets has driven our investment in
digital platforms. We have developed Diverge, an
energy data management software platform for the
collection, processing, storage and delivery of smart
meter and related energy data. Diverge is being used
by Bluecurrent (a provider of smart metering services
and solutions that is 50% owned by Vector) to provide
energy data to electricity distribution network operators
in Australia and New Zealand, to improve the visibility
of the impacts of distributed renewable generation and
electrification on their networks.
Vector’s electricity distribution network also uses Diverge
for ingesting and storing smart meter and related energy
data to provide various analytical functions and insights.
Time period
Short term: 0 – 5 years
Medium term: 5 – 10 years
Vector’s opportunity management strategy
We are building solutions using bespoke services co-developed
between Vector’s wholly owned subsidiary Vector Technology
Solutions (VTS) and AWS. This has seen VTS establish the Diverge
solution for Bluecurrent and Vector as well as launch a go-to-
market initiative for international markets.
Beyond the arrangements with Bluecurrent, Vector’s
electricity distribution network also uses Diverge for ingesting
and storing smart meter and related energy data for various
analytical functions.
We are also continuing our partnership with X (Google’s
innovation lab), contributing to their Tapestry project, as one
of a select group of global partners collaborating on next-
generation platforms for network management. These tools
include Tapestry’s ‘GridAware’, which uses new technology
including drones and applies machine learning and modern
artificial intelligence processes to survey and guide maintenance
of the network. This enhances the job of traditional network
inspection, which is much more labour intensive, through
greater efficiency and new inspection techniques. Another tool,
Tapestry’s ‘Grid Planning Tool for Distribution’, creates robust
network simulations that incorporate optimised solutions for
new technology such as solar photovoltaic installations and the
growth of customer-owned devices like batteries and electric
vehicle chargers, to ensure an efficient network.
These two partnerships support key components of our
Symphony strategy, using digital solutions and innovation to
enable more efficient use of the network, and improve our
planning capabilities. This opportunity is funded from the Vector
group’s annual budget, along with out-of-cycle requests from the
board when specific opportunities arise. We note the Commerce
Commission’s innovation and non-traditional solutions allowance
(INTSA) which could provide up to $28.4 million in research and
development during the current five-year regulatory period.
The specific internal capital deployment and funding decisions
related to this opportunity are not disclosed here because of
commercial sensitivity.
Anticipated impact
The need for more, higher-quality, and near-real-time energy
data can be expected to increase as more distributed energy
resources such as electric vehicles and intermittent renewable
generation capacity enter the electricity system. Developing
energy platforms like Diverge would allow Vector to improve
management of our electricity distribution network and offer this
capability as a service to other networks, both locally and globally.
This would therefore enable us to better serve our customers and
monetise this technology in the future.
O
21
StrategyRisks
Metrics
and targets
References
and Appendix
Risk
management
OpportunitiesGovernance
OPPORTUNITY 2:
Distributed energy resources
Opportunity description
Key scenario: orderly decarbonisation
Type: transitional – resource efficiency
Sector: electricity
Geography: Auckland
In the orderly decarbonisation scenario, distributed solar,
batteries (including vehicle-to-grid (V2G)) and micro-
grids (including utility-scale batteries) – combined with
smart, remotely manageable energy systems (such
as hot water load control and smart electric vehicle
chargers) – act as demand-side energy resources
that complement centralised large-scale electricity
generation. Efficient and effective demand-side
management of these distributed energy resources
presents an opportunity for Vector’s role to evolve to
include more advanced distribution system operation
(DSO), involving advanced integrated network planning,
evolved commercial arrangements with third parties,
and more active network management. This has the
added benefit of contributing to the mitigation of risk
1: inability to efficiently manage load to avoid network
congestion.
Time period
Short term: 0 – 5 years
Medium term: 5 – 10 years
Long term: 10 – 30 years
Vector’s opportunity management strategy
Vector’s future network road map, detailed in section 2 of
the 2024
3
electricity asset management plan, consists of
four priority areas:
‒ Achieving supportive commercial, regulatory and policy
settings. During the short term, we will continue working with
market participants, regulators, policy-makers and appliance/
network standard agencies to work towards settings that
enable the demand-side orchestration of distributed energy
resources. We expect a more rapid addition of distributed
energy resources in the medium term
‒Understanding customer needs and preferences in relation
to the management of distributed energy resources. Vector
continues to invest in analytics to understand customer needs
and behaviours, and increase communication with electricity
retailers to gather insights
‒Increasing our access to distributed energy resource capacity
– through improved visibility of distributed energy resources,
demand-side management, evolved pricing and commercial
mechanisms, continued coordination with third parties such
as electricity retailers, and direct integration of distributed
energy resources with our network management systems
‒ Building capability, by continuing to make no-regrets
investments in new enabling technologies, developing new
commercial arrangements and operating protocols with
third parties, and increasing our understanding of customer
response to load management practices and incentives.
This opportunity serves as an input into Vector’s financial
planning process via our electricity asset management plan.
Vector’s FY2025 electricity asset management plan includes
approximately $50 million of capital deployment towards
distributed energy resource management over the next 10 year
period. This forms part of the non-network digital capex forecasts
in our electricity asset management plan. This opportunity is
further supported by the platforms highlighted in opportunity 1:
energy platforms.
3. A detailed asset management plan which includes narratives such as the future network roadmap is only published every second year.
The last detailed asset management plan for electricity was in 2024. The 2025 plan was a shorter update.
Anticipated impact
Efficient demand-side management and orchestration of
distributed energy resources connected to the network has
the potential to reduce peak congestion on the network and
manage network security during emergency events (such as
storms). This may support Vector’s electricity distribution network
to reduce unnecessary capital deployment and avoid increased
customer costs.
Orchestration of distributed energy resources is also crucial after
network outages. If appropriately managed, the distributed
energy resources could support and stabilise a network restart.
However, if they are not controlled, and all demand turns
on as power is restored, it could cause a large instantaneous
spike in demand which could overload transformers and
distribution lines – and trip protection devices, therefore delaying
network restoration.
Future industry architecture, and the scope of advanced
distribution system operation (including new functions and
capability required) are currently the subject of much discussion
among the electricity industries in New Zealand and globally.
The Electricity Authority has expressed a preference to ensure
risks of potential conflicts of interest across these functions
are mitigated, which could include ring-fencing of certain
DSO functions from network ownership and operation. While
not strictly a threat to the achievement of the objectives of
Vector’s strategy, this could reduce the scope and scale of
the opportunities available to the Vector group in executing
the strategy.
O
22
22
Vector climate-related disclosures 2025
GovernanceStrategyRisksOpportunitiesMetrics
and targets
References
and Appendix
Risk
management
Communication and consultation
Establish the context
Risk assessment
Identify risk
Analyse risk
Evaluate risk
Treat risk
Monitoring and review
Risk management
Vector’s approach to risk management
Vector’s group enterprise risk management framework is
consistent with the risk management standard ISO 31000.
The framework is embedded in our business through our risk
governance, policies, guidelines and risk partnership model that
the group risk team maintains with the different business units
to support Vector’s risk management.
Figure 4: Vector’s enterprise risk management framework
We use a risk assessment criterion within our group enterprise
risk management framework to support a consistent approach
to risk management across the Vector group. Our board risk
and assurance committee has responsibility for overseeing and
reviewing our group enterprise risk management framework,
and the related policies, and Vector’s group material risks.
Our process for identifying and prioritising material
climate-related risks and opportunities
Risks or opportunities are assessed as material if their residual
risk is assessed as high to very high based on the group risk
assessment criteria – which takes into consideration severity and
likelihood. In addition to this, Vector also employs the following
two criteria specifically for the climate-related disclosure process:
‒ A risk or opportunity has a potential financial impact greater
than 5% of Vector’s market capitalisation
‒A risk or opportunity contributes to or forms a barrier to
emission reductions outside of Vector’s organisational
boundary which constitutes more than 1% of
national emissions.
If the risk or opportunity meets any of the above criteria, it is
considered material and prioritised, with oversight from the
climate change steering committee. A summary of climate-
related risks and opportunities is reviewed by the board risk and
assurance committee.
As part of our bottom-up approach, the group risk team work
to identify new climate-related risks with all business units.
While we only directly engage our internal business units in our
risk review, we consider our value chain when analysing and
managing climate-related risks and opportunities. This includes
our upstream supply chain, downstream customer impacts, and
Vector’s subsidiaries and investments (excluding investments
that fall below 20% ownership
4
). Our approach to defining our
value chain boundary and exclusions is discussed in the value
chain subsection of the strategy section on page 16.
4. At the date of this report, Vector has no investments below 20% ownership.
23
StrategyRisks
Metrics
and targets
References
and Appendix
Risk
management
OpportunitiesGovernance
Figure 5: Vector’s climate-related risk and opportunity management process flow. This process occurs annually.
Review and update existing climate-change risks
and opportunities. Identify changes in risks and
opportunities, trends and ratings.
Prioritise high-level climate-change-related risks
and opportunities.
List of prioritised climate-change-related risks and
opportunities approved by board risk and
assurance committee.
Working with operational business units to collect
data and metrics for recognised targets.
Changes to scenarios and methodology for risk
quantification presented to board audit committee.
Engagement with external advisors to identify
gaps and improve reporting.
Group sustainability and group risk and
resilience teams engage with key stakeholders
across the Vector group.
Discuss and update mitigations and
their effectiveness.
Refine inputs, assumptions and methodologies
for modelling.
High-level climate change risks and
opportunities presented to the climate
change steering committee.
Involvement of group finance to assess risks
and opportunities.
First draft of climate-related disclosures presented
to board audit committee.
Oct
Nov
March
June
Risk management (continued)
24Vector climate-related disclosures 2025
GovernanceStrategyRisksOpportunitiesMetrics
and targets
References
and Appendix
Risk
management
Our process for understanding the impacts of risks
and opportunities
Vector also conducts more detailed physical and transitional
risk modelling to understand the business impacts and
opportunities. These are described on page 15, and summarised
here for completeness.
Physical risks
Vector quantitatively and qualitatively studies physical risk,
working with the University of Auckland’s Department of Civil
and Environmental Engineering, Earth Sciences NZ (formerly
NIWA) and ClimSystems.
To date, Vector has investigated the following climate-related
physical risks:
‒ Fluvial and pluvial flood exposure across all electrical assets
‒ Flood-depth exposure at zone substations
‒ Extreme high water level from coastal inundation across
zone substations
‒ Projected increase in frequency and duration of high wind-
speeds generally (not against any specific asset type)
‒Flood and wind impacts from cyclones
‒ Landslip risk to overhead electricity assets
‒ Fire risk after extended periods of hot and dry weather,
which could be triggered by Vector’s overhead assets
under normal operating conditions.
Risk management (continued)
Transition risks
To evaluate transition risks and opportunities, the Vector
group insights team uses a customer scenario model to
estimate the impact of energy transitions, such as the uptake
of electric vehicles, on the electricity distribution network. The
model supports Vector to assess potential future load growth
requirements, plan for network flexibility requirements, and
understand the impact this may have on our customers.
Further details of this scenario model, including high-level
model assumptions, can be found in the strategy section
and are explained in section 10 of Vector’s electricity asset
management plan [3].
The Vector insights team also uses a scenario model to evaluate
different elements of the disorderly transition on the gas network.
Time frames
We use the time horizons below in our scenario analysis and
physical and transitional risks and opportunities assessment.
As explained below, each time horizon has been selected
because of its link to our asset planning horizons and capital
deployment plans:
‒ Short term (0-5 years), to reflect typical business planning
and regulated price path cycles which sets Vector’s regulated
revenue streams
‒ Medium term (5-10 years), to allow for our asset management
plans for gas and electricity networks that detail capital and
operational expenditure forecasts over a 10-year period
‒ Long term (10-30 years), to account for longer impacts over
existing and future planned assets and business activities.
25
StrategyRisks
Metrics
and targets
References
and Appendix
Risk
management
OpportunitiesGovernance
Metrics and targets
Vector uses metrics and targets to measure and manage our
climate-related risks and opportunities disclosed in the strategy
section. Within this disclosure we also include our scope 1, 2
and 3 greenhouse gas emissions, and our target to reduce
select emissions.
Greenhouse gas emissions
We have published our greenhouse gas emissions in our FY2025
greenhouse gas emission inventory (GHG inventory) report,
available here [1].
Vector measures and reports our greenhouse gas emissions in
accordance with:
‒ The greenhouse gas protocol – a corporate accounting and
reporting standard
‒ The greenhouse gas protocol – scope 2 guidance
‒ The greenhouse gas protocol’s corporate value chain (scope 3)
accounting and reporting standard
‒ Other related technical guidance issued under the
greenhouse gas protocol standard.
Together we refer to these as the greenhouse gas protocol. This
splits greenhouse gas emissions into three categories:
Scope 1 – Direct emissions from sources Vector directly owns
or controls such as emissions from our vehicle fleet’s fuel
combustion, our diesel backup generators, methane leaks from
our natural gas distribution network, and SF
6
leaks from our
electricity distribution network.
Scope 2 – Indirect emissions from Vector’s consumption of
purchased electricity, and electricity distribution losses along
the network.
Scope 3 – All other indirect value chain emissions, including
customer energy consumption, and supply chain emissions.
The greenhouse gas protocol splits scope 3 emissions into
15 categories. A breakdown of Vector’s emissions by scope
and category can be found in table 3 with bespoke emissions
intensity metrics in table 2.
All calculations are expressed in total tonnes of carbon dioxide
equivalent (tCO₂e).
Vector uses the operational control approach, as defined by
the greenhouse gas protocol, to measure and report emissions.
This allows emissions reduction efforts to focus on emissions
over which Vector has the greatest control, and thereby can
influence most.
Our base year for emissions reporting is FY2020 (1 July 2019 to
30 June 2020). Vector recalculates emissions of historic years if
the inventory is affected by changes that in aggregate total 5%
of our carbon footprint. These changes can be structural (for
example acquisitions or divestments), changes in the way the
inventory is calculated, or discovery of omissions or errors. Vector
might decide to update historic years for changes below the
threshold for other reasons, such as consistency or clarity.
Additional information on Vector’s organisational boundaries for
the purpose of emissions calculation, including the treatment of
investments, operational boundaries, emission factors, exclusions,
summary of changes to previous years, methodologies, and
results, can be found in Vector’s greenhouse gas emissions
inventory report [1].
5. Vector made a public commitment to net-zero emissions by 2030 in 2017, which contemplated the use of offsets. This commitment has
since been updated in FY2021 with an additional absolute emissions-reduction target to reduce our absolute scope 1 and 2 emissions by
53.5% by FY2030, which does not anticipate use of offsets. In FY2025 Vector has used the 53.5% target to manage our climate-related risks
and opportunities and it is against this target that we track our performance.
Independent limited assurance over Vector’s greenhouse
gas emissions inventory was provided by KPMG (see Vector’s
greenhouse gas emissions inventory report [1]).
Emissions reduction target
In FY2021 Vector set an absolute emissions reduction target.
That target is for Vector to reduce our scope 1 and 2 emissions
(excluding electricity distribution losses) by 53.5% by FY2030 from
a FY2020 baseline. The target was developed by thinkstep-anz in
2021, based on a methodology published by the Science Based
Target Initiative (SBTi) and the SBTi’s then applicable guidance
on reductions required to be consistent with keeping global
warming to 1.5°C.
Our target has not been validated by SBTi because SBTi’s
methodology provided for the inclusion of emissions related to
electricity distribution losses, which we have excluded. Further
detail regarding this exclusion is set out on page 27.
The emissions reduction target does not rely on any offsets
5
.
Vector does not have any interim targets. However, we have
internal emissions reduction targets that are weighted to staff
remuneration, which are explained in more detail on page 34.
In FY2025 we achieved our emission reduction target, five years
ahead of the original FY2030 target date, with a reduction in our
scope 1 and 2 emissions (excluding distribution losses) of 55%
compared to the FY2020 base year. This was largely because
of a reduction in natural gas fugitive emissions, along with a
reduction in diesel-generation-related emissions.
Meeting the target in FY2025 does not guarantee that the
emissions reductions can be maintained in subsequent years.
There are key risks highlighted in table 4 that could result in
Vector missing our target in any given year.
Our total emissions across all three scopes (including electricity
distribution losses) have decreased by 54% since FY2020. This is
mainly owing to a reduction in natural gas consumption in the
Auckland region, combined with a wind-down of Vector’s Natural
Gas Trading contracts.
Vector’s emissions intensity, in table 2, has also decreased across
four out of five categories, which are linked to our emissions
reductions across our gas and electricity businesses. The final
metric, ‘kgCO2e per MWh delivered – including electricity
distribution losses’ fluctuates largely owing to New Zealand’s
national electricity emission factor, however this can also change
because of characteristics on our distribution network, which
can be a result of several factors including load profiles, and
distance to load.
A breakdown of emissions by scope and a comparison of
emissions per scope since Vector’s base year in FY2020 can
be found in table 3. These summaries of emissions have been
extracted from our greenhouse gas emissions inventory report [1].
26Vector climate-related disclosures 2025
GovernanceStrategyRisksOpportunitiesMetrics
and targets
References
and Appendix
Risk
management
Metrics and targets (continued)
Table 2: GHG emissions intensity of select scope 1 and 2 emissions
EMISSIONS INTENSITYEMISSIONS SOURCES INCLUDEDFY2020FY2021 FY2022FY2023FY2024FY2025
kgCO
2
e per gas pipeline
length in m
Total natural gas fugitive emissions2.661.962.331.901.341.12
kg CO
2
e per main** lines
length in m
Natural gas fugitive emissions
attributable to main lines
1.021.091.350.780.770.53
kg CO
2
e per service** lines
length in m
Natural gas fugitive emissions
attributable to service lines
5.223.043.643.541.861.69
kgCO
2
e per MWh delivered
– excluding electricity
distribution losses***
Stationary combustion, SF
6
,
and location-based electricity
consumption of Vector’s electricity
business
0.530.540.690.580.470.26
kgCO
2
e per MWh delivered
– including electricity
distribution losses***
Stationary combustion, SF
6
, location-
based electricity consumption of
Vector’s electricity business, and
electricity distribution losses
4.434.585.365.563.544.82
** Main gas lines refer to the shared pipeline infrastructure, while service lines connect the customer to the main line.
*** Electricity distribution losses are excluded from our emissions reduction target (see explanation above).
Figure 6: (left) Emissions included in Vector’s emissions reduction target - scope 1 and 2 excluding distribution losses and their
comparison to the FY2020 base year. (right) Vector’s yearly scope 1 and 2 emissions excluding distribution losses since FY2020.
Emissions are in tCO₂e.
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
Group emissionsFY2030 target
Emissions (tCO
₂
e)
FY30FY29FY28FY27FY26FY25FY24FY23FY22FY21FY20
FY2030 emissions
reduction target
FY2025FY2020
Emissions (tCO
e)
Electricity
consumption
(market-based)
Vehicle
fleet
Stationary
combustion
including
biogenic
carbon
Other
fugitive
emissions
SF
6
leakage
Natural gas
distribution
fugitive
emissions
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
Electricity distribution losses
Electricity distribution losses are not like a water or gas leak; they are an inherent characteristic of electricity distribution networks.
Although we can measure these losses, and report their associated emissions based on New Zealand’s published electricity generation
emission factor, we can never fully remove them. As distribution losses are largely an inevitable by-product of electrical conduction,
Vector has elected to exclude emissions associated with such losses from our emissions reduction target. This allows our target to focus
on emissions that we can more readily manage.
27
StrategyRisksOpportunitiesReferences
and Appendix
Risk
management
Metrics
and targets
Governance
Metrics and targets (continued)
Table 3: GHG inventory by scope and category in tCO
2
e. FY2025 emissions highlighted in green indicate a reduction since the base
year or year in which emissions were first reported, whereas emissions in red show increases.
EMISSIONS CATEGORYFY2020FY2021FY2022FY2023FY2024FY2025
Total scopes 1, 2 and 31,712,4231,495,0521,129,8721,090,392985,712794,241
Scope 122,93318,45722,19318,33413,85010,449
Natural gas distribution fugitive emissions18,31313,50716,21813,3239,3797,887
SF₆ leakage5241,2632,0811,299924487
Other fugitive emissions
‡
13113111812549103
Stationary combustion
‡
3,3422,7553,0992,8382,7331,325
Vehicle fleet
‡
623801677749766647
Scope 233,08734,35339,40242,77426,89739,476
Electricity consumption* (market based)
‡
582731324184539
Electricity consumption (location based)
‡
7307218081,117619644
Electricity distribution losses32,50533,62239,07842,59026,89239,437
Scope 31,656,4031,442,2421,068,2781,029,285944,966744,316
Purchased goods and services
Upstream-purchased natural gas
§
227,569170,44235,02618,7977,024–
Fuel used by field service providers6,4756,8226,4567,2357,1276,087
Upstream-purchased materials
and products
‡
12,8846,70911,2549,87312,3089,435
Upstream-purchased other goods
and services
‡
72,56867,39071,09476,76076,23979,224
Fuel and energy-related activities
‡
1,0829791,1101,1141,065642
Upstream transportation
| |
–––––
Waste generated in operations
‡
628353
Business travel
‡
2947065230144202
Employee commuting and working
from home
‡
859657729
Use of sold products
Distributed natural gas Auckland – Total772,265760,185711,336735,048706,355647,278
Sold natural gas – Auckland
§
151,603115,57857,14942,32219,193–
Other distributed natural gas – Auckland
§
620,662644,607654,188692,727687,162647,278
Sold natural gas – non-Auckland
§
562,567381,871231,127178,484133,260–
Shipped natural gas – non-Auckland
§
47,002––––
Investments
Bluecurrent700771809821703666
Biogenic carbon16213415013813164
‡
Recalculated FY2020 to FY2024 to remove emissions relating to the sale of the Ongas LPG business. For details, see sections 1 and 4 of the
greenhouse gas emissions inventory report [1].
* Market-based method for electricity consumption. While location-based electricity emissions are also included in our inventory, the amounts
summed in table 3 include only market-based emissions, as these form part of our emissions reduction target.
§
Recalculated FY2022 to FY2024 to remove emissions relating to the sold Natural Gas Trading contracts. As a result of the closure of the business
from 1 July 2024, there are no FY2025 emissions relating to purchased, sold or shipped natural gas. For details, see sections 1 and 4 of the
greenhouse gas emissions inventory report [1].
| |
Recalculated FY2020 to FY2024 to remove emissions relating to the sale of the Ongas LPG business. For details, see sections 1 and 4 of the
greenhouse gas emissions inventory report [1]. Post the Ongas sale, emissions from third-party transportation for upstream-purchased
materials and products are immaterial and are therefore excluded from reporting.
28Vector climate-related disclosures 2025
GovernanceStrategyRisksOpportunitiesMetrics
and targets
References
and Appendix
Risk
management
Marginal carbon abatement cost curve
In FY2022 Vector developed a carbon abatement cost curve to
help measure and understand our emissions reduction target
(scope 1 and 2 excluding electricity distribution losses) and
actions available to us to contribute to reaching this target.
This work identifies the financial impact of potential carbon
reduction activity across scope 1 and 2 emissions, using an
internal carbon cost of $140 per tCO
2
e. This amount was chosen
as it aligned with the Climate Change Commission’s 2021
recommendations to government to meet its 2050 targets [11],
and is consistent with our internal carbon cost since FY2022.
We consider this internal carbon cost to still be appropriate.
Through this work, we identified emissions that could be reduced
while achieving cost savings for the group (those with negative
abatement cost) and others that were close to cost neutral (those
with bars close to $0/tCO
2
e/year), with the balance assessed as
being more complex to abate given the availability of current
alternatives. While the data in the cost curve is updated based
on the latest information, it presents forward-looking estimates
of emissions reduction potential, as opposed to actual emissions
results. The estimates are also conservative, which explains
how we have already met our emissions reduction target, even
though we have not yet completed all the actions on the curve.
The cost curve was updated in FY2025 to include the sale of the
Ongas business – this removed any emissions reduction activities
associated with Ongas, along with a removal of corresponding
historic emissions.
Changes in technology, project prices, emissions cost modelling,
new business innovation and a range of other factors may
alter the marginal carbon abatement cost curve in our
future disclosures.
Abatement
cost
$/tCO₂e/year
Abatement
potential
tCO₂e
Using mobile transformers as
opposed to diesel generators for
multi-day upgrades (2024)
Hybrid generator (in trial)
Transition remaining light
vehicle fleet to EV (2020 – 2027)
Transition vans and utes to
electric (when available)
3-month gas pipeline surveying (2027)
Vector headquarters to ‘6 Green Star’
building (2023)
Annual gas pipeline
surveying (2022)
6-month gas pipeline surveying (2024)
SF6
monitoring
Renewable-only
electricity (2023)
Uncosted emissions
Third-party
gas pipeline
damage
Public engagement on dial
before you dig (2023)
Completed
In progress
Planned
Other
fugitive
methane
Other
diesel
generation
$140/
tCO₂e
53.5%
Emissions
reduction
target
3-month high-pressure gas
pipeline surveying (2025)
Reducing unnecessary diesel
generation through process
optimisation (2021)
$0
-$1,000
-$2,000
$1,000
Metrics and targets (continued)
Figure 7: Vector’s marginal carbon cost abatement curve. The horizontal axis corresponds to Vector’s total FY2020 scope 1 and 2
emissions excluding electricity distribution losses. Each bar relates to a potential emissions reduction initiative where the thickness
of the bar details the amount of emission reductions estimated to be possible as a result of the initiatives. The vertical axis
represents the estimated cost, with negative values indicating estimated cost savings. Initiatives are ordered left to right, from
the most cost saving to the most expensive.
29
StrategyRisksOpportunitiesReferences
and Appendix
Risk
management
Metrics
and targets
Governance
CARBON ABATEMENT RISKDESCRIPTION
Damage to high-pressure pipelinesDamage to Vector’s high-pressure gas pipelines can release significant
quantities of CO₂e. For example, two leaks detected in FY2022 were
responsible for the release of over 3,000 tCO₂e. While we can reduce
emissions over time on average, these high-volatility events can cause a
sudden spike in emissions for that reporting year. In addition, there is a risk
that emissions from third-party damages (such as a contractor digging into
the pipe) remain high or increase, with limited influence from Vector’s side.
Long-term SF₆ assets on Vector’s networkMany of Vector’s SF₆ assets have a lifetime beyond 2030. It is challenging
to replace all these assets before FY2030, and leaks can be largely
unpredictable. Although we have installed some monitoring devices
that alert us of leaks quickly, there is still a risk that leaks could increase
and keep occurring. SF₆ has an emission factor 23,500 times that of
CO₂; therefore, even small leaks of SF₆ can have material impacts on our
emissions inventory.
Table 4: Key risks that may form a barrier to Vector achieving our emissions reduction target
Metrics and targets (continued)
Assets vulnerable to transition risks
Vector’s assets that are vulnerable to transition risks are
our gas-related businesses and investments. This table
highlights our key gas businesses that are potentially
vulnerable to transition risks and their associated carrying
value. We are currently disclosing 100% of the total
carrying value as this represents a conservative estimate
of potential impacts. This does not include the electricity
distribution network.
The sale of the Ongas business and the investment in
Liquigas, along with the wind-down and subsequent
closure of Vector’s Natural Gas Trading business has
reduced some of our exposure to transition risks. The
main drivers behind reduction in the carrying value of
the gas network were the goodwill impairments in both
FY2025 and FY2024.
30 JUNE 202330 JUNE 202430 JUNE 2025
Gas network607.0546.4497.7
Ongas71.868.0Sold
Natural Gas
Trading
13.3Ceased trading–
Liquigas (100%)72.774.7Sold
30Vector climate-related disclosures 2025
GovernanceStrategyRisksOpportunitiesMetrics
and targets
References
and Appendix
Risk
management
Assets vulnerable to physical risks
Vector has modelled electricity distribution network
assets vulnerable to flood impacts and landslip risk. With
respect to freshwater flooding, while we have highlighted
12 zone substations at potential risk of flooding, only
some assets within those zone substations are at risk of
damage. Flood modelling conducted in FY2023 did not
take into account the depth of water, and therefore was
insufficient at assessing the true asset exposure – for
this reason we chose not to disclose data for this year.
The more comprehensive flood-depth modelling was
conducted in FY2024 and updated in FY2025 to include
more infrequent high impact events. The decrease in the
number of zone substation assets exposed to flooding
risk in FY2025 is a result of the completion of the Wairau
zone substation flood mitigation project. The increase
in the number of power poles exposed to landslip risk is
because of more poles in Vector’s asset base. We are still
awaiting data from the completion of the Earth Sciences
NZ (formerly GNS) Sliding Lands project, which may
supersede this current analysis. We do not have landslip
data for the period before FY2024.
Business activities aligned with climate-related
opportunities and capital deployment towards
climate-related risks and opportunities
The values listed here represent the total carrying
value, revenue and capital expenditure invested in the
electricity distribution network.
As we did in FY2024, we are currently disclosing 100%
of the total capital expenditure of the entire electricity
distribution business as being aligned with our
climate-related opportunities. This is because there is
currently no clear method to identify specific capital
expenditure allocated to individual climate-related
risks and opportunities; for example, the specific
capital expenditure associated with managing risk 1
(inability to efficiently manage load to avoid network
congestion), risk 3 (weather impacts), and opportunity
2 (distributed energy resources). This is the same when
related to the amount of capital deployed towards
climate-related risks and opportunities in the reporting
period. Data in FY2024 was restated to align with
changes in the segment allocation in Vector’s annual
report, with electricity distribution now recognised as a
separate reporting segment (previously combined with
gas distribution).
The increase in annual gross capex on our electricity
distribution business between FY2023 and FY2025
reflects Auckland’s growth, electrification of transport
and industry, and new types of connections such as
data centres, making trend identification more complex.
Vector’s revenue is impacted by total energy delivered,
pricing adjustments, and pass-through recoverable costs.
ASSET TYPERISK TYPE
TOTAL
ASSETS
ANALYSED
POTENTIAL
NUMBER
OF ASSETS
EXPOSED IN
FY2024
POTENTIAL
NUMBER
OF ASSETS
EXPOSED IN
FY2025
Zone
substations*
Freshwater
flooding
1131312
Zone
substations
Coastal
inundation
11311
Power polesLandslip125,950
(in FY2024)
126,513
(in FY2025)
331351
ELECTRICITY
DISTRIBUTION
CARRYING
VALUE ($M)
REVENUE
INCLUDING
CONTRIBUTIONS
($M)
ANNUAL GROSS
CAPEX ($M)
FY20234,579.9834.5389.6
FY2024
(restated)
4,863.8872.6457.0
FY20255,151.3960.1432.0
Metrics and targets (continued)
* In Vector’s voluntary FY2023 TCFD report, we disclosed 119 zone substations
as being potentially vulnerable to freshwater flooding, as complex flood
modelling, and technical engineering investigation were still in development.
The improvements in methodology and data quality noted above mean that
we can disclose more meaningful information in relation to this metric for
FY2024 and FY2025.
31
StrategyRisksOpportunitiesReferences
and Appendix
Risk
management
Metrics
and targets
Governance
Electric vehicle uptake in Auckland
Related to risk 1:
inability to efficiently manage load to avoid network
congestion
Related to opportunity 1:
energy platforms
Related to opportunity 2:
distributed energy resources
Vector monitors electric vehicle uptake in Auckland to understand
their impact on the network and emerging charging behaviours.
Electric vehicle registrations peaked in December 2023. The
uptake of electric vehicles slowed after December 2023 because
of additional costs being added to electric vehicle use (road
user charges and rebate removals), combined with a broader
economic slowdown.
0
Cumulative electric vehicles in Auckland
Number of vehicles
201320142015201620172018
2019202020212022202320242025
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
60,000
50,000
Actual gas volumes
Related to risk 2:
gas transition
Gas distribution volumes in Auckland have been trending
down since 2019. Note that COVID impacts have caused
a decrease in activity in FY2022 also. There has been a
loss of multiple large industrial loads due to business
closures or relocation from Auckland, along with a reduced
consumption per connection. The reduced consumption
can be attributed to numerous factors, including
decarbonisation, reduction in business output, and derisking
operations from supply side risk. Residential gas use per
household has been decreasing as well.
Total gas connections
Related to risk 2:
gas transition
Overall we have observed a continued slowdown in all segments
for new connections over recent years, and the connections
we are getting are typically smaller on average than historical
averages. Forecasts in our gas asset management plan (linked
to a disorderly decarbonisation scenario) show a decline in net
connections to the gas network from FY2026, and the overall
gas volume continuing to decline, but at a faster rate than in
prior years.
Gas distribution volume in Auckland
FY13FY14FY15FY16FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25
11
11.5
12
12.5
13
13.5
14.5
15
14
PJ
Total commercial gas connections
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
IndustrialSmall and Medium Enterprise
June 2015
June 2016
June 2017
June 2018
June 2019
June 2020
June 2021
June 2022
June 2023
June 2025
June 2024
Numb er of connections
Total residential gas connections
85,000
90,000
95,000
100,000
105,000
110,000
115,000
June 2015
June 2016
June 2017
June 2018
June 2019
June 2020
June 2021
June 2022
June 2023
June 2024
June 2025
Residential
Numb er of connections
Metrics and targets (continued)
32Vector climate-related disclosures 2025
GovernanceStrategyRisksOpportunitiesMetrics
and targets
References
and Appendix
Risk
management
RY2020RY2021RY2022RY2023RY2024RY2025
New capacity connected (MVA)1.84.84.1151210
Number of new connections219901582179916531106
Distributed generation uptake in Auckland
Related to risk 1:
inability to efficiently manage load to avoid network
congestion
Related to opportunity 1:
energy platforms
Related to opportunity 2:
distributed energy resources
NORMALISED UNPLANNED
SAIDI/SAIFI
RY2023RY2024RY2025REGULATORY LIMIT
6
SAIDI118.798.476.56104.83
Major event SAIDI292.314.116.3–
SAIFI1.191.130.901.337
Vector registers distributed generation – for example photovoltaic
solar-uptake in the Auckland region. This can be used to
understand the uptake of this type of distributed energy resource
within Auckland. We have disclosed the metrics by regulatory year,
which ends 31 March 2025, for simplicity and consistency with our
wider disclosures.
We have noted a 5.5-fold increase in capacity of distributed
generation connected in RY2025 compared to RY2020. The metric
refers to the electricity distribution network regulatory year, which
is from 1 April to 31 March. We have, however, noticed that both the
capacity and number of connections appear to have decreased
from RY2023.
Metrics and targets (continued)
Industry-based metrics/targets:
Electrical power outages
Related to risk 3:
increase in extreme weather events
SAIDI and SAIFI are two measures that the Commerce
Commission uses to monitor a reliable standard of service to
customers. We have disclosed the metrics in regulatory year,
which ends 31 March 2025, for simplicity and consistency with our
wider disclosures. SAIDI and SAIFI incorporate all causes of power
outages, including non-weather-related outages such as car
accidents on power lines, and asset failure. However, an increase
in the frequency of high wind-speeds, flood events, and high
temperature days can still contribute to an increase in SAIDI and
SAIFI. These two metrics are defined as:
SAIDI (system average interruption duration index) – Average
outage duration for each customer served over the course of a
regulatory year.
SAIFI (system average interruption frequency index) – Average
number of interruptions per customer per regulatory year.
Vector seeks to be below the regulatory limits set at 104.83 and
1.337 for SAIDI and SAIFI respectively.
6
Major event SAIDI – Days of severe impacts that breach the
SAIDI unplanned boundary value of 4.83 SAIDI minutes
6
. While
major event SAIDI does not have a target, it is a metric that can
indicate an increase in extreme weather events, such as cyclones.
This is noted in the significant increase in major event SAIDI in
the 2023 regulatory year, which included Cyclone Gabrielle and
the Auckland Anniversary Floods. There are no targets for major
event SAIDI.
We have maintained our performance under the regulatory limit
in RY2025.
6. Note that from 1 April 2025, Vector has moved to a new regulatory period (DPP4), where the limits have changed to 110.07 and 1.40 for SAIDI and
SAIFI respectively. The major event SAIDI unplanned boundary value has also increased to 5.79 minutes. This will impact our FY2026 disclosure.
33
StrategyRisksOpportunitiesReferences
and Appendix
Risk
management
Metrics
and targets
Governance
Remuneration: Senior staff performance goals
Remuneration targets impact the overall short-term incentive
payments to the executive team members and their eligible
direct reports. The targets are designed and agreed by the
executive team, ensuring alignment with our corporate strategy,
and approved by Vector’s people and remuneration board
committee and the full board. All payments are subject to full
board approval and discretion.
Vector’s emissions reduction goals were designed to track
towards our FY2030 emissions reduction target. In FY2023 an
additional goal to quantify supply chain emissions was added
to support the development of our scope 3 greenhouse gas
emissions inventory.
The resilience target has remained constant to prevent
exceeding the regulatory limits of SAIDI/SAIFI. In FY2025 an
additional qualitative resilience goal was set to uplift Vector’s
approach to climate-change resilience planning.
FY2023FY2024FY2025
% contribution to short-term incentive
goals
7
5 – 30%10% - 30%0% - 22%
Criteria
Emission reduction from FY2020
against scope 1 and 2 emissions
(excluding electricity line losses)
16.1% reduction
A further qualitative
emissions accounting
goal which involves
the development of a
methodology for calculating
supply chain scope 3
emissions
21.4% reduction39.2% reduction
ResilienceNot exceeding the regulatory
limits of 104.83 SAIDI, and
1.337 SAIFI
Not exceeding the regulatory
limits of 104.83 SAIDI, and
1.337 SAIFI
Not exceeding the regulatory
limits of 104.83 SAIDI, and
1.337 SAIFI
And a further qualitative
climate change resilience
goal which includes:
1) Community engagement
with customers and
communities vulnerable
8
to climate-change impacts
2) Development of a model/
framework to calculate
the trade-off between
investment options and
resilience outcomes
3) Engagement with
government and regulators
to propose financial and
investment criteria on how
Vector should consider
resilience investment.
Metrics and targets (continued)
7. The range is due to weighting differences between business units. Some business units have zero weighting to some criteria when they do not
have reasonable influence over them.
8. We used historic customer outage data during major storm events to define ‘vulnerability’.
34Vector climate-related disclosures 2025
GovernanceStrategyRisksOpportunitiesMetrics
and targets
References
and Appendix
Risk
management
Metrics and targets (continued)
Table 5: NZCS cross-referenced to Vector’s greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions inventory report. The sections referenced below form
part of the CRD.
STANDARDDETAILSLOCATION OF DISCLOSURE IN
GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS
INVENTORY REPORT
NZCS 1 (24)GHG emissions - An entity must disclose the following in
relation to its GHG emissions:
See below
NZCS 1 (24)(a)A statement describing the standard or standards that its
GHG emissions have been measured in accordance with.
Introduction, page 2
NZCS 1 (24)(b)The GHG emissions consolidation approach used: equity
share, financial control, or operational control.
Organisational boundaries, page 5
NZCS 1 (24)(c)The source of emission factors and the global warming
potential (GWP) rates used or a reference to the GWP source.
Table 4, pages 8 - 10
NZCS 1 (24)(d)A summary of specific exclusions of sources, including
facilities, operations or assets with a justification for their
exclusion.
Table 3, page 6
NZCS 3 (52)An entity must provide a description of the methods and
assumptions used to calculate or estimate GHG emissions,
and the limitations of those methods. When choices between
different methods are allowed, or entity-specific methods
are used, an entity must disclose the methods used and the
rationale for doing so.
Table 4, pages 8 - 10, and data collection
and quantification, pages 11 and 12
NZCS 3 (53)An entity must describe uncertainties relevant to the entity’s
quantification of its GHG emissions, including the effects of
these uncertainties on the GHG emissions disclosures.
Table 4, pages 8 - 10
NZCS 3 (54)An entity must provide an explanation for any base year GHG
emissions restatements.
GHG emissions calculation and results,
page 13
35
StrategyRisksOpportunitiesReferences
and Appendix
Risk
management
Metrics
and targets
Governance
1
Vector’s annual reports. Accessed 13 August 2025 <https://www.vector.co.nz/investors/reports>
2
Vector’s governance. Accessed 8 August 2025 <https://www.vector.co.nz/investors/governance>
3
Vector Limited. 2025. Vector Electricity Asset Management Plan. Accessed 8 August 2025 <https://www.vector.co.nz/about-us/
regulatory/disclosures-electricity/asset-management-plan>
4
Vector Limited. 2025. Vector Gas Asset Management Plan. Accessed 8 August 2025 <https://www.vector.co.nz/about-us/
regulatory/disclosures-gas/gas-asset-management>
5
IPCC, 2021: Summary for Policymakers. In: Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group
I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Masson-Delmotte, V, Zhai P, Pirani A,
Connors S L, Péan C, Berger S, Caud N, Chen Y, Goldfarb L, Gomis M I, Huang M, Leitzell K, Lonnoy E, Matthews J B R, Maycock T
K, Waterfield T, Yelekçi O, Yu R and Zhou B (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY,
USA, pp 3−32, doi:10.1017/9781009157896.001.
6
Network for Greening the Financial System. NGFS Scenarios. Accessed 8 August 2025 <https://www.ngfs.net/ngfs-scenarios-
portal/>
7
Climate Change Commission. 2023 Draft advice to inform the strategic direction of the Government’s second emission
reduction plan. Accessed 8 August 2025 <https://www.climatecommission.govt.nz/public/Advice-to-govt-docs/ERP2/draft-erp2/
CCC4940_Draft-ERP-Advice-2023-P02-V02-web.pdf>
8
Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment. 2025. Petroleum reserves data. Accessed 13 August 2025 <https://www.mbie.
govt.nz/building-and-energy/energy-and-natural-resources/energy-statistics-and-modelling/energy-statistics/petroleum-
reserves-data>
9
Vector Limited. 2023. Managing the gas transition - options preserving solutions to manage consumer risks from gas asset
stranding. Accessed 8 August 2025 <https://blob-static.vector.co.nz/blob/vector/media/vector-2024/vector-2023-managing-the-
gas-transition.pdf>
10
Gas Infrastructure Future Working Group. 2023. Gas Transition Analysis Paper. Accessed 8 August 2025 <https://comcom.govt.
nz/__data/assets/pdf_file/0012/323130/Gas-Infrastructure-Working-Group-GIFWG-Attachment_-Gas-Transition-Analysis-Paper-13-
June-2023-Submission-on-IM-Review-2023-Draft-Decisions-19-July-2023.pdf>
11
Climate Change Commission. 2021. Ināia tonu nei: a low emissions future for Aotearoa. Accessed 8 August 2025
<https://www.climatecommission.govt.nz/public/Inaia-tonu-nei-a-low-emissions-future-for-Aotearoa/Inaia-tonu-nei-a-low-
emissions-future-for-Aotearoa.pdf>
References
36Vector climate-related disclosures 2025
GovernanceStrategyRisksOpportunitiesMetrics
and targets
References
and Appendix
Risk
management
Appendix 1: KPMG’s Limited Assurance Report
© 2025 KPMG, a New Zealand Partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organization of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited,
a private English company limited by guarantee. All rights reserved.
Document classification: KPMG Public
Independent Limited Assurance
Report to Vector Limited
Conclusion
Our limited assurance conclusion has been formed on the basis of the matters outlined in this report.
Based on our limited assurance engagement, which is not a reasonable assurance engagement or an audit,
nothing has come to our attention that would lead us to believe that, in all material respects, the Climate-
related Disclosures of Vector Limited for the year ended 30 June 2025 are not fairly presented and prepared
in accordance with the Aotearoa New Zealand Climate Standards issued by the External Reporting Board.
Information subject to assurance
We have performed an engagement to provide limited assurance in relation to Vector Limited’s Climate-related
Disclosures for the period 1 July 2024 to 30 June 2025.
The Climate-related Disclosures includes the following:
‒ Statement of Compliance on page 2;
‒ Governance related disclosures on pages 7 to 10;
‒ Strategy related disclosures on pages 11 to 17;
‒ Risk Management related disclosures on pages 18 to 25; and
‒ Metrics and Targets related disclosures on pages 26 to 35.
The Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, additional required disclosures of those
emissions and the related method, assumptions and estimation uncertainty disclosures (GHG Disclosures) are
included within Vectors Limited’s Climate-related Disclosures as follows:
‒ Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 GHG emissions included in the Metrics and Targets related disclosures
in Table 3 on page 28; and
‒ Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 additional required disclosures and gross greenhouse gas emissions
methods, assumptions and estimation uncertainty disclosures contained within the Greenhouse Gas
Emissions Inventory report, as outlined in Table 5 on page 35.
Our assurance engagement does not extend to any other information included, or referred to, in the Vector
Climate-related disclosures (other information). We have not performed any procedures with respect to the
other information.
Criteria
The criteria used as the basis of the Company’s Climate-related Disclosures is the Aotearoa New Zealand
Climate Standards (NZCS):
37
StrategyRisksOpportunitiesMetrics
and targets
Risk
management
References
and Appendix
Governance
• NZCS 1 Climate Related Disclosures;
• NZCS 2 Adoption of Aotearoa New Zealand Climate Standards; and
• NZCS 3 General Requirements for Climate-related Disclosures.
The Scope 1, 2 and 3 Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and the GHG related disclosures required under NZCS
Greenhouse Gas emissions Disclosures, have been measured in accordance with the World Resources Institute
and World Business Council for Sustainable Development’s Greenhouse Gas Protocol standards and guidance:
• The Greenhouse Gas Protocol: A Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard (revised edition);
• The Greenhouse Gas Protocol: GHG Protocol Scope 2 Guidance: An amendment to the GHG Protocol
Corporate Standard; and
• The Greenhouse Gas Protocol: Corporate Value Chain (Scope 3) Accounting and Reporting Standard
As a result, this report may not be suitable for another purpose.
Standards we followed
We conducted our limited assurance engagement on the Climate-related Disclosures in accordance with
International Standard on Assurance engagements (New Zealand) 3000 (Revised) Assurance Engagements
Other Than Audits or Reviews of Historical Financial Information) (ISAE (NZ) 3000 (Revised) issued by the New
Zealand Auditing and Assurance Standards Board.
GHG emissions
We conducted our limited assurance engagement on the Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions and the GHG-related
disclosures required under NZCS in accordance with New Zealand Standard on Assurance Engagements 1 (NZ
SAE 1) Assurance Engagements over Greenhouse Gas Emissions Disclosures and International Standard on
Assurance Engagements (New Zealand) 3410 Assurance Engagements on Greenhouse Gas Statements (ISAE
(NZ) 3410) issued by the New Zealand Auditing and Assurance Standards Board.
We believe that the evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our conclusion.
Our responsibilities under ISAE (NZ) 3000 (Revised), NZ SAE 1 and ISAE (NZ) 3410 are further described in the
‘Our responsibility’ section of our report.
How to interpret limited assurance and material misstatement
A limited assurance engagement is substantially less in scope than a reasonable assurance engagement in
relation to both the risk assessment procedures, including an understanding of internal control, and the
procedures performed in response to the assessed risks.
Misstatements, including omissions, within the Climate-related disclosures are considered material if, individually
or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the relevant decisions of the intended users
taken on the basis of the Climate-related disclosures.
Inherent limitations
As noted in the Climate-related Disclosures page 3, forward-looking statements are subject to a number of
uncertainties and factors because of associated limitations, evolving methodology and availability of data.
As noted in the Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory Report in Table 4 on pages 8 to 10, GHG quantification is
subject to inherent uncertainty because of incomplete scientific knowledge used to determine emission factors
and the values needed to combine emissions of different gases.
38Vector climate-related disclosures 2025
GovernanceStrategyRisksOpportunitiesMetrics
and targets
References
and Appendix
Risk
management
Use of this assurance report
Our report is made solely for Vector Limited. Our assurance work has been undertaken so that we might state to
Vector Limited those matters we are required to state to them in the assurance report and for no other purpose.
Our report should not be regarded as suitable to be used or relied on by anyone other than Vector Limited for
any purpose or in any context. Any other person who obtains access to our report or a copy thereof and chooses
to rely on our report (or any part thereof) will do so at its own risk.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, none of KPMG, any entities directly or indirectly controlled by KPMG, or
any of their respective members or employees accept or assume any responsibility and deny all liability to
anyone other than Vector Limited for our work, for this independent assurance report, and/or for the opinions or
conclusions we have reached.
Our conclusion is not modified in respect of this matter.
Vector Limited’s responsibility for the Climate-related Disclosures
The Directors of Vector Limited are responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of the Climate-related
Disclosures in accordance with the criteria. This responsibility includes the design, implementation and
maintenance of such internal control as Directors determine is relevant to enable the preparation of the Climate-
related Disclosures that are free from material misstatement whether due to fraud or error.
The Directors of Vector Limited are also responsible for selecting or developing suitable criteria for preparing the
GHG disclosures and appropriately referring to or describing the criteria used.
Our responsibility
We have responsibility for:
• planning and performing the engagement to obtain limited assurance about whether the Climate-related
Disclosures are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error;
• forming an independent conclusion based on the procedures we have performed and the evidence we
have obtained; and
• reporting our conclusion to Vector Limited.
Summary of the work we performed as the basis for our conclusion
A limited assurance engagement performed in accordance with the Standard involves assessing the suitability in
the circumstances of Vector Limited’s use of the criteria as the basis for the preparation of the Climate-related
Disclosures, assessing the risks of material misstatement of the Climate-related Disclosures whether due to fraud
or error, responding to the assessed risks as necessary in the circumstances, and evaluating the overall
presentation of the Climate-related Disclosures.
We exercised professional judgement and maintained professional scepticism throughout the engagement. We
designed and performed our procedures to obtain evidence about the Climate-related Disclosures that is
sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our conclusion.
Our procedures selected depended on the understanding of the Climate-related Disclosures that is sufficient and
appropriate to provide a basis for our conclusion. The procedures we performed were based on our professional
judgment and included inquiries, observation of processes performed, inspection of documents, analytical
procedures, evaluating the appropriateness of quantification methods and reporting policies, and agreeing or
reconciling with underlying records.
In undertaking limited assurance on the Climate-related Disclosures the procedures we primarily performed
were:
39
StrategyRisksOpportunitiesMetrics
and targets
Risk
management
References
and Appendix
Governance
Climate-related Disclosures
• obtained, through inquiries, an understanding of Vector Limited’s control environment, processes and
information systems relevant to the preparation of the Climate-related Disclosures. We did not evaluate
the design of particular control activities, or obtain evidence about their implementation;
• for selected disclosures obtained documentation or agreed to source, either in total or on a sample
basis, to assess whether the disclosure was fairly presented and evidence available which substantiated
the disclosure;
• obtained, through inquiries and corroborating evidence, an understanding of the underlying process
undertaken by Vector Limited to identify material climate-related risks and opportunities and how this is
consistent with the qualitative disclosures; and
• evaluated the Climate-related Disclosures against the NZCS disclosure requirements and the fair
presentation principles.
GHG disclosures
• obtained, through inquiries and walkthroughs, an understanding of Vector Limited’s control environment,
processes and information systems relevant to the preparation of the GHG disclosures;
• evaluated whether Vector Limited’s methods for developing estimates are appropriate and had been
consistently applied. Our procedures did not include testing the data on which the estimates are based
or separately developing our own estimates against which to evaluate Vector Limited’s estimates;
• recalculated the emissions for a limited number of items;
• performed analytical procedures on particular emission categories by comparing the expected GHGs
emitted to actual GHGs emitted and made inquiries of management to obtain explanations for any
significant differences we identified; and
• considered the presentation and disclosure of the GHG disclosures against the NZCS disclosure
requirements.
The procedures performed in a limited assurance engagement vary in nature and timing from, and are less in
extent than for a reasonable assurance engagement. Consequently, the level of assurance obtained in a limited
assurance engagement is substantially lower than the assurance that would have been obtained had a
reasonable assurance engagement been performed.
Our independence and quality management
This assurance engagement was undertaken
We have complied with the independence and other ethical requirements of Professional and Ethical Standard 1
International Code of Ethics for Assurance Practitioners (including International Independence Standards) (New
Zealand) (PES 1) issued by the New Zealand Auditing and Assurance Standards Board, which is founded on
fundamental principles of integrity, objectivity, professional competence and due care, confidentiality and
professional behaviour.
The firm applies Professional and Ethical Standard 3 Quality Management for Firms that Perform Audits or
Reviews of Financial Statements, or Other Assurance or Related Services Engagements (PES 3), which requires
the firm to design, implement and operate a system of quality control including policies or procedures regarding
compliance with ethical requirements, professional standards and applicable legal and regulatory requirements.
We have also complied with Professional and Ethical Standard 4 Engagement Quality Reviews (PES 4) which
deals with the appointment and eligibility of the engagement quality reviewer and the engagement quality
reviewer’s responsibilities relating to the performance and documentation of an engagement quality review.
Our firm has also provided regulatory assurance services, other assurance services, and compliance services in
relation to R&D tax credits services to Vector Limited. Subject to certain restrictions, partners and employees of
our firm may also deal with Vector Limited on normal terms within the ordinary course of trading activities of the
business of Vector Limited. These matters have not impaired our independence as assurance providers of
Vector Limited for this engagement. The firm has no other relationship with, or interest in, Vector Limited.
40Vector climate-related disclosures 2025
GovernanceStrategyRisksOpportunitiesMetrics
and targets
References
and Appendix
Risk
management
As we are engaged to form an independent conclusion on the Climate-related Disclosures prepared by Vector
Limited, we are not permitted to be involved in the preparation of the Climate-related Disclosures as doing so
may compromise our i ndependence.
The engagement partner on the assurance engagement resulting in this independent assurance report is Matt
Diprose.
KPMG
Auckland
22 August 2025
41
StrategyRisksOpportunitiesMetrics
and targets
Risk
management
References
and Appendix
Governance
VECTOR.CO.NZ
---
GREENHOUSE
GAS EMISSIONS
INVENTORY
REPORT 2025
2Vector GHG Emissions Inventory Report FY2025
Introduction
This report is for the Vector Limited Group (Vector or the group).
The group comprises Vector Limited and its subsidiaries. Vector
Limited is NZX listed and 75.1% owned by Entrust, a private
community trust. A list of all subsidiaries can be found in
appendix 1.
The purpose of this report is to transparently disclose Vector’s
greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions: how they are quantified, how
Vector is tracking towards its reduction target and steps planned
to further reduce GHG emissions.
The inventory covered in this report is a complete and accurate
quantification of the amount of GHG emissions that can be
attributed to Vector’s operations within the declared boundary
and scope for the specified reporting period. Any exclusions from
reporting are disclosed and justified.
This report has been prepared in accordance with the
Greenhouse Gas Protocol:
‒A Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard [1]
(GHG Protocol Standard);
‒The Greenhouse Gas Protocol: Scope 2 Guidance [2];
‒The Greenhouse Gas Protocol: Corporate Value Chain
(Scope 3) Accounting and Reporting Standard [3]
(GHG Protocol Value Chain Standard); and
‒Other related technical guidance issued under the
GHG Protocol Standards.
A summary of emissions can be found in both Vector’s annual
report 2025 and climate-related disclosures 2025.
Statement of intent
Vector reports on its GHG emissions on an annual basis and has
been calculating its carbon footprint since 2017. The intended
users of this report are all interested stakeholders, including
shareholders, investors, regulators, communities, employees,
customers and contractors. The GHG inventory has been subject
to limited assurance by KPMG; see appendix 3.
Reporting period covered
This GHG inventory report covers Vector’s financial year 1 July 2024
to 30 June 2025 (FY2025).
Disclaimer
This report is not earnings guidance or financial advice for
investors. Rather, this report provides a summary of Vector’s
GHG emissions inventory. The report reflects Vector’s current
understanding as at 22 August 2025, in respect of the 12 months
ended 30 June 2025.
GHG emissions calculations use data and methodologies that
are developing. Vector acknowledges that the understanding of
climate change and the inputs to assist with this understanding
are constantly evolving.
This report contains forward-looking statements (including
targets and assumptions) that may not evolve as predicted.
Vector (including its directors, officers and employees) does not:
‒Represent that the statements, intentions and/or opinions
contained in this report will not change, or will remain correct
after publishing this report, or
‒Promise to revise or update those statements and opinions
if events or circumstances change or unanticipated events
happen after publishing this report.
The GHG emissions data described in this report, and Vector’s
strategies to achieve its GHG emissions target, may not
eventuate or may be more or less significant than anticipated.
There are many factors that could cause Vector’s actual results,
performance or achievement of climate-related targets to
differ materially from that described, including economic and
technological viability, and climatic, government, consumer
and market factors outside of Vector’s control. Vector gives no
representation, warranty or assurance that actual outcomes or
performance will not materially differ from the forward-looking
statements.
To the maximum extent possible under New Zealand law, Vector
(including its directors, officers and employees) does not accept
and expressly disclaims any liability whatsoever for any direct,
indirect or consequential loss or damage occasioned from any
use or inability to use the information contained in this report,
whether directly or indirectly resulting from inaccuracies, defects,
errors, omissions, out-of-date information or otherwise.
We recommend you seek independent advice before acting or
relying on any information in this report. Vector reserves the right
to revise statements made in, or its strategy or business activities
described in, this report, without notice.
This disclaimer should be read along with other methodologies,
assumptions and uncertainties and limitations contained in
this report, as well as in Vector’s climate-related disclosures for
FY2025. All amounts disclosed in this report are estimates and are
in New Zealand dollars, unless context otherwise requires.
This report is not an offer document and does not constitute an
offer or invitation or investment recommendation to distribute
or purchase securities, shares, or other interests. Nothing in this
report should be interpreted as capital growth, earnings or any
other legal, financial tax or other advice or guidance. For detailed
information on our financial performance, please refer to our
annual report, available at vector.co.nz/investors/reports.
Summary of
emissions
Organisational
boundaries
Operational
boundaries
Data collection
and quantification
References
and Appendix
GHG emissions
calculation
and results
GHG emissions
reductions
3
Summary of emissions
In FY2025, Vector’s greenhouse gas emissions across scopes 1, 2 and 3 amount to 794,241 tCO₂e. This is a 54% reduction from FY2020,
Vector’s base year.
Table 1: GHG inventory by scope and category in tCO₂e. FY2025 emissions highlighted in green indicate a reduction since the base
year or the year in which emissions were first reported, whereas emissions in red show increases.
EMISSIONS CATEGORYFY2020FY2021FY2022FY2023FY2024FY2025
Total scopes 1, 2 and 31,712,4231,495,0521,129,8721,090,392985,712794,241
Scope 122,93318,45722,19318,33413,85010,449
Natural gas distribution fugitive emissions18,31313,50716,21813,3239,3797,887
SF₆ leakage5241,2632,0811,299924487
Other fugitive emissions
‡
13113111812549103
Stationary combustion
‡
3,3422,7553,0992,8382,7331,325
Vehicle fleet
‡
623801677749766647
Scope 233,08734,35339,40242,77426,89739,476
Electricity consumption* (market based)
‡
582731324184539
Electricity consumption (location based)
‡
7307218081,117619644
Electricity distribution losses32,50533,62239,07842,59026,89239,437
Scope 31,656,4031,442,2421,068,2781,029,285944,966744,316
Purchased goods and services
Upstream-purchased natural gas
§
227,569170,44235,02618,7977,024–
Fuel used by field service providers6,4756,8226,4567,2357,1276,087
Upstream-purchased materials
and products
‡
12,8846,70911,2549,87312,3089,435
Upstream-purchased other goods
and services
‡
72,56867,39071,09476,76076,23979,224
Fuel and energy-related activities
‡
1,0829791,1101,1141,065642
Upstream transportation
| |
–––––
Waste generated in operations
‡
628353
Business travel
‡
2947065230144202
Employee commuting and working
from home
‡
859657729
Use of sold products
Distributed natural gas Auckland – Total772,265760,185711,336735,048706,355647,278
Sold natural gas – Auckland
§
151,603115,57857,14942,32219,193–
Other distributed natural gas – Auckland
§
620,662644,607654,188692,727687,162647,278
Sold natural gas – non-Auckland
§
562,567381,871231,127178,484133,260–
Shipped natural gas – non-Auckland
§
47,002––––
Investments
Bluecurrent700771809821703666
Biogenic carbon16213415013813164
‡
Recalculated FY2020 to FY2024 to remove emissions relating to the sale of the Ongas LPG business. For details, see sections 1 and 4.
* Market-based method for electricity consumption. While location-based electricity emissions are also included in our inventory, the amounts
summed in table 1 include only market-based emissions, as these form part of our emissions reduction target.
§
Recalculated FY2022 to FY2024 to remove emissions relating to the sold Natural Gas Trading contracts. As a result of the closure of the business
from 1 July 2024, there are no FY2025 emissions relating to purchased, sold or shipped natural gas. For details, see sections 1 and 4.
| |
Recalculated FY2020 to FY2024 to remove emissions relating to the sale of the Ongas LPG business. For details, see sections 1 and 4. Post
the Ongas sale, emissions from third-party transportation for upstream-purchased materials and products are immaterial and are therefore
excluded from reporting.
Organisational
boundaries
Operational
boundaries
Data collection
and quantification
References
and Appendix
GHG emissions
calculation
and results
GHG emissions
reductions
Summary of
emissions
4Vector GHG Emissions Inventory Report FY2025
Glossary of terms
Table 2: Definition and glossary of terms
TERMDESCRIPTION
Carbon footprintVector’s greenhouse gas emissions covered by the Kyoto Protocol, calculated in tonnes of carbon dioxide
equivalent (tCO₂e)
CO₂Carbon dioxide
CRDClimate-related disclosures that comply with Aotearoa New Zealand Climate Standards
DEFRADepartment of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (UK)
EmissionsGreenhouse gas emissions
EPDEnvironmental product declaration
FSPField service provider
FYFinancial year – 1 July to 30 June
GHGGreenhouse gas
For the purposes of this report, GHGs are the seven gases listed in the Kyoto Protocol. These are currently:
carbon dioxide (CO₂), methane (CH₄), nitrous oxide (N₂O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs),
sulphur hexafluoride (SF₆), and nitrogen trifluoride (NF₃).
GHG ProtocolThe Greenhouse Gas Protocol, a partnership between the World Resources Institute (WRI) and the World
Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). The GHG Protocol develops standards and guidance,
such as the Corporate Standard and the Corporate Value Chain (scope 3) Standard, both used as guidance for
this report.
GWPGlobal warming potential, a measure of how much energy the emissions of 1 tonne of a greenhouse gas will
absorb over a given period, relative to the emissions of 1 tonne of carbon dioxide (CO₂)
GXPGrid exit point
HVACHeating, ventilation and air conditioning
ICPInstallation control point
IPCC (AR5)Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Fifth Assessment Report)
LPGLiquefied petroleum gas – a mixture of hydrocarbons, consisting primarily of propane and butane. The
higher density – in contrast to natural gas – allows it to be easily compressed to liquid, and is therefore largely
distributed in bottles.
MfEMinistry for the Environment (New Zealand)
NZNew Zealand
NZUNew Zealand units
NZECSNew Zealand energy certificate scheme
NZ ETSNew Zealand emissions trading scheme
OGMPOil and Gas Methane Partnership
QICInvestment vehicles managed and advised by Queensland Investment Corporation
SBTiScience Based Targets initiative
SELMAStreet evaluation laser methane assessment
SF₆Sulphur hexafluoride – a gas used to electrically insulate electrical assets. SF₆ has a global warming potential
of 23,500 times that of CO₂.
T&DTransmission and distribution
tCO₂eTonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent
TPDThird-party damages
VectorVector Limited Group
WTTWell-to-tank
Summary of emissions (continued)
Organisational
boundaries
Operational
boundaries
Data collection
and quantification
References
and Appendix
GHG emissions
calculation
and results
GHG emissions
reductions
Summary of
emissions
5
Description of Vector
Vector is an innovative New Zealand energy company, delivering
energy and communication services to more than 630,000
residential and commercial customers across New Zealand.
The operations of the group are electricity and gas distribution,
telecommunications and new energy solutions. For further
information, visit vector.co.nz.
Organisational boundaries
Vector uses the operational control approach, as defined by
the GHG Protocol Standard. This approach was chosen as it
allows a focus on emissions over which the group has greatest
control, and thereby can influence most with emissions
reduction measures.
For carbon accounting purposes, emissions are categorised
into the business areas as outlined in figure 1. A detailed list
of all subsidiaries and shareholdings under Vector and their
relevance for carbon accounting can be found in appendix 1.
Treatment of investments
For carbon accounting purposes, Vector has set a threshold
for equity investments of 20%, unless significant influence can
be evidenced.
Bluecurrent (50%)
Previously fully owned by Vector as Vector Metering, Bluecurrent
manages advanced electricity and gas meters across
New Zealand and Australia. Vector has ceased operational
control of Bluecurrent and accounts for a proportional share
of Bluecurrent's scope 1 and 2 emissions under scope 3 –
category 15. Bluecurrent is jointly owned by QIC and Vector.
1. Organisational boundaries
Treatment of business closures
Natural Gas Trading
Vector’s Natural Gas Trading business has been on a wind-
down since FY2020, whereby contracts for natural gas sales
were not renewed. This has led to a year-on-year reduction in
gas sales-related scope 3 emissions, under category 11 – use of
sold products and category 1 – purchased natural gas. On 1 July
2024, Vector completed the sale of the remaining contracts in
the natural gas business, and shut down the business from then
on. As the remaining contracts were sold to a third party, for
FY2025 reporting, Vector’s GHG inventory for FY2022 to FY2024
has been rebased to remove the emissions associated with these
sold contracts. There is no impact on years before FY2022 as the
earliest start date of the contracts sold was 1 July 2021.
Treatment of business/investment sales
On Gas Limited and Liquigas Limited
On 25 July 2024, Vector signed a conditional agreement for the
sale of the Ongas LPG business, and the 60.25% shareholding in
Liquigas Limited. The sale was completed on 31 January 2025.
Emissions created by these businesses have been removed for
years FY2020 onwards.
mPrest Systems Limited (8.1%)
On 22 August 2024, Vector sold its 8.1% shareholding in mPrest
Systems (2003) Limited.
No recalculation is required as the shareholding in mPrest was
excluded from Vector’s emissions inventory as it was below
Vector’s materiality threshold for investments.
HRV
Vector announced the sale of HRV after balance date, on 1 August
2025. No adjustment to the FY2025 GHG emissions inventory
report is required as a result of this event, however the impact will
be considered for future disclosures.
Figure 1: Vector Limited’s businesses per organisational boundaries
Owns and operates the
electricity network within
the wider Auckland region.
This consists of more than
19,000 km of electricity
lines, delivering power to
over 630,000 homes and
businesses.
Owns and operates the
gas distribution network in
the wider Auckland region,
supplying gas to over 120,000
installed connection points,
through 4,670 km of mains
pipelines, distributing around
12 petajoules (PJ) of gas
per year.
Other includes
telecommunications,
digital services, energy
solution services and
corporate operations.
Vector Limited
Electricity distributionGas distributionOther
Summary of
emissions
Operational
boundaries
Data collection
and quantification
References
and Appendix
GHG emissions
calculation
and results
GHG emissions
reductions
Organisational
boundaries
6Vector GHG Emissions Inventory Report FY2025
2. Operational boundaries
Operational boundaries
The GHG Protocol Standard splits emissions into three categories:
Scope 1 – Emissions Vector directly controls, such as vehicle fleet
fuel combustion, diesel backup generators, natural gas fugitive
emissions, and SF₆ leaks.
Scope 2 – Vector’s consumption of purchased electricity, and
electricity distribution losses along the network.
Scope 3 – All other indirect value chain emissions, such as
customer energy consumption and supply chain emissions.
The GHG Protocol Value Chain Standard splits scope 3 emissions
into 15 categories. To gain a more comprehensive understanding
of our emissions, in FY2020 Vector commissioned an external
review of our carbon accounting methodology. This included a
scope 3 screening exercise to identify applicable and material
categories and activities across Vector’s supply chain. A total of
14 categories were determined as being applicable to Vector (all
but category 10 – processing of sold products), of which two were
defined as material. The threshold at which a scope 3 category is
considered as material is set to 1% of total scope 3 emissions.
During the screening process, emissions were calculated for
11 scope 3 categories, with emissions from the remaining three
categories considered to be included in other categories of
the inventory (categories 2 and 8) or to be zero (category 12).
Prior to FY2023, we chose to externally report only on emissions
categories that were material (categories 1 and 11) or where data
was deemed robust (categories 3, 4, 6 and 15). With additional
work undertaken to more accurately determine emissions
from other sources, from FY2023 we also reported on emissions
under categories 5 and 7 as well as emissions from all purchased
products and services under category 1.
Included in other categories
Category 2 – capital goods: Included in category 1 as it was not
possible to separate new infrastructure construction and other
assets from maintenance of existing infrastructure.
Category 8 – upstream leased assets: Included in scope 1 and 2,
as leased assets are expected to be under Vector’s operational
control.
Table 3: Excluded emissions sources from reporting
EXCLUDED EMISSIONS ACTIVITYREASONS FOR EXCLUSION
Emissions from FSP fuel use where fuel amount is <1% of overall FSP fuel
use (part of category 1 – fuel used by FSPs)
Emissions immaterial; data difficult to obtain
Use of sold HVAC units (part of category 11 – use of sold products)Likely immaterial; limited data availability
Emissions from cash expense claims for air travel, hotels, employee travel
in public transport and rental cars (part of category 6 – business travel)
Emissions immaterial; data difficult to obtain
Excluded scope 3 categories
Category 4 – upstream transportation: for most purchased
products, transport is covered by category 1 – upstream-
purchased other goods and services as it is included in the
purchase price. Emissions from remaining transportation are
expected to be immaterial.
Category 9 – downstream transportation and distribution:
immaterial.
Category 12 – end-of-life treatment of sold products: expected
to be zero.
Category 13 – downstream leased assets: immaterial.
Category 14 – franchises: immaterial.
GHG emissions source inclusions
Table 4 provides an overview of all emissions sources
highlighted in Vector’s GHG inventory, including their data
sources, calculation methods and an assessment of data
quality and uncertainty.
For completeness, Vector is reporting on well-to-tank (WTT)
emissions for fuel used by field service providers (FSPs) under
category 1, as well as reporting on emissions from gas distributed
via Vector’s gas network under category 11 (other distributed
natural gas).
For the FY2020 to FY2024 period, some gas sold or shipped by
Natural Gas Trading was transported via Vector’s gas distribution
network. These volumes were subtracted from the overall ‘other
distributed natural gas’ amount to avoid double counting.
Exclusions from GHG inventory
Table 3 shows scope 3 emissions sources that were excluded from
reporting (in addition to the excluded categories listed previously)
and the reasoning behind this.
Other emissions – biogenic CO₂
Vector uses a 5% biodiesel blend in generators used by Vector
Fibre and the electricity distribution network.
Summary of
emissions
Organisational
boundaries
Data collection
and quantification
References
and Appendix
GHG emissions
calculation
and results
GHG emissions
reductions
Operational
boundaries
7
Figure 2: Examples of emissions sources across Vector’s value chain
Upstream
Scope 3Scope 2Scope 1Scope 3
VectorVector
DIRECTINDIRECTINDIRECTINDIRECT
Downstream
The extraction,
production and
manufacture of
materials and
services Vector
purchases from
around the globe
create emissions
at source and
en route to us.
Field service crews
distribute and
install these
materials on
behalf of Vector.
This requires
transportation.
Because of the laws
of physics, some
electricity that
Vector distributes
is lost along the
way. Generation
emissions
associated with
this electricity loss
is included in
Vector’s footprint.
Scope 2 emissions
also include
electricity
consumption at
Vector’s offices
and substations.
Some of our assets
can leak global
warming gases
through damage
or age.
We use fuels in
vehicles to deliver
goods, and in
generators to keep
the power going
during outages.
Distributed gas
is burned by
consumers for
their everyday
activities.
2. Operational boundaries (continued)
Summary of
emissions
Organisational
boundaries
Data collection
and quantification
References
and Appendix
GHG emissions
calculation
and results
GHG emissions
reductions
Operational
boundaries
8Vector GHG Emissions Inventory Report FY2025
Table 4: Emissions calculation methods, data quality and sources for FY2025 reporting. For years before FY2025, refer to previous
GHG reports.
REPORTING
CATEGORY
EMISSIONS
ACTIVITY
CALCULATION
METHOD
DATA
SOURCE
GWP
SOURCE
DATA QUALITY
AND UNCERTAINTY
SCOPE 1
Natural gas
distribution
fugitive
emissions
Fugitive
natural
gas across
Vector’s
distribution
network
See section 3FSP records;
company
records on asset
database
MfE (2025) –
IPCC AR5
Quality-assured data on all leaks by asset
and emissions category provided by FSPs.
Multiple estimates and assumptions
made, as laid out in section 3, lead
to medium uncertainty that Vector
is continuing to improve. Vector’s
methodology has been reviewed by
GNS Science, and assessed as OGMP
2.0 Level 3 or slightly above.
SF₆ fugitive
emissions
SF₆ leaks in
switchgear
Top-up methodGas recovery
records; FSP SF₆
cylinder records’
log sheets;
nameplate
capacity
amounts
Records on gas top-ups and recoveries
provided by FSPs. Medium level of
uncertainty that Vector is working on
improving where possible.
Other fugitive
emissions
HVAC leaks
(offices,
substations,
vehicle fleet)
and CO₂
Top-up and
screening
method
for HVAC;
estimates
for CO₂
Service records;
inventory lists
Most data on HVAC top-ups available,
and when not available annual averages
for each inventory item used as specified
by MfE. CO₂ use estimated – de minimis.
High uncertainty, but emissions <1% of
scope 1 and are considered adequate.
Biodiesel
stationary
combustion
Biodiesel
used in
generators
Fuel-based
method
Provider recordsRecords on litres of diesel used in
generators supplied by lease provider
monthly. Low uncertainty.
Vehicle fleetFuel used in
vehicle fleet
Fuel-based
method
Fuel records by
lease providers
Records on diesel and petrol use sourced
from fuel card data. Low uncertainty.
SCOPE 2
Electricity
consumption
from grid
(market and
location based)
Electricity use
at offices and
substations
Location-based
method and
market-based
method,
respectively
Invoices by
retailers;
BraveTrace
website (market-
based approach)
MfE (2025)
– IPCC AR5
(location
based)
NZECS –
market based
Consumption data in kWh provided by
retailers. Records on NZECS to calculate
market-based approach provided on
BraveTrace website. Moderate uncertainty
from emission factors.
Electricity
distribution
losses
Electricity
losses along
the network
Location-based
method
Transpower
and distributed
generators
(ingoing);
retailers
(outgoing)
MfE (2025) –
IPCC AR5
Metered data at grid exit point (GXP)
provided by Transpower and distributed
generators. Data at installation control
points (ICP) level provided by retailers.
Some estimations at year-end. Low
uncertainty.
2. Operational boundaries (continued)
Summary of
emissions
Organisational
boundaries
Data collection
and quantification
References
and Appendix
GHG emissions
calculation
and results
GHG emissions
reductions
Operational
boundaries
9
2. Operational boundaries (continued)
REPORTING
CATEGORY
EMISSIONS
ACTIVITY
CALCULATION
METHOD
DATA
SOURCE
GWP
SOURCE
DATA QUALITY
AND UNCERTAINTY
SCOPE 3
C1 – fuel used
by FSPs
Fuel used
by FSPs
on behalf
of Vector,
including
WTT
Hybrid methodFuel data provided
by FSPs
MfE (2025) –
IPCC AR5
DEFRA
(2025) – IPCC
AR5
Petrol and diesel use on
behalf of Vector shared by
each FSP for relevant business
areas, in litres. Some data on
regular and premium petrol
combined. Low uncertainty.
100%
C1 – upstream-
purchased
materials and
products
Key products
purchased
across Vector
business
areas
Supplier-
specific and
average-data
method
Procurement data
on quantities (by
weight or length) of
products purchased
EPDs – IPCC
AR5
Records on quantities sourced
from internal systems. Where
supplier-specific data was
used, uncertainty is lowest.
For average-data method,
some estimations were made
and secondary data is used;
therefore, uncertainty is
relatively high. More details in
section 3.
15%
C1 – upstream-
purchased
other goods
and services
All remaining
products
and services
purchased
Spend-based
method
Procurement
spend data
Eora MRIO
2022
Spend by supplier sourced
from internal procurement
system, emission factor was
assigned based on supplier’s
main business activity. High
uncertainty. More details in
section 3.
0%
C3 – fuel- and
energy-related
activities
T&D,
upstream
and WTT
emissions
from the
group’s
electricity
and fuel use
Average-data
method
Same invoice
data as fuel and
electricity use in
scope 1 and 2
MfE (2025)
– IPCC AR5
(T&D losses)
DEFRA
(2025) – IPCC
AR5 (WTT
fuels)
DEFRA
(2021) – IPCC
AR4 (WTT
electricity)
All data based on fuel data
or location-based electricity
consumption data provided
for scope 1 and 2. T&D
emissions not calculated for
electricity consumption in
Auckland, as this is covered
under scope 2 losses.
Moderate uncertainty from
emission factors.
0%
1. Proportion of emissions calculated using calculation methods based on data specific to suppliers or other value chain partners. Remaining
emissions are calculated using internal or average data.
Table 4 (continued): Emissions calculation methods, data quality and sources for FY2025 reporting. For years before FY2025, refer
to previous GHG reports.
EMISSIONS
CALCULATED USING
DATA PROVIDED
BY VALUE CHAIN
PARTNERS
1
Summary of
emissions
Organisational
boundaries
Data collection
and quantification
References
and Appendix
GHG emissions
calculation
and results
GHG emissions
reductions
Operational
boundaries
10Vector GHG Emissions Inventory Report FY2025
REPORTING
CATEGORY
EMISSIONS
ACTIVITY
CALCULATION
METHOD
DATA
SOURCE
GWP
SOURCE
DATA QUALITY
AND UNCERTAINTY
SCOPE 3
C5 – waste
generated in
operations
Waste sent
to landfill
from Vector’s
offices
Waste-type
specific
method
Waste contractor
records
MfE (2025) –
IPCC AR5
Weight per waste category
by location provided by
waste contractors. Some
measurements use averages.
Based on information
provided by Vector’s waste
contractors, it is assumed
that all waste goes to landfills
with gas recovery. Medium
uncertainty that is considered
adequate as <1% of scope 3.
0%
C6 – business
travel
Air travel,
hotels, rental
cars, mileage
claims, and
taxis
Distance-
based method
Records provided
by booking agents
or internal expense
management
platform
MfE (2025)
– IPCC AR5
(flights
excluding
radiative
forcing)
Monthly travel details
provided by booking agents
on km flown by class of travel,
hotel nights by country, km
travelled by size of rental car,
km travelled by taxi. Employee
mileage emissions based on
km, average petrol vehicle,
and some spend base for
taxis. Medium uncertainty
that is considered adequate
as <1% of scope 3.
0%
C7 – employee
commuting
and working
from home
(WFH)
Emissions
from staff
commutes
to work and
WFH
Distance-
based method
Results from
staff survey on
commuting habits
MfE (2025) –
IPCC AR5
Data gathered on travel
modes, distance to work,
and days in office via staff
survey. Extrapolated for the
full year assuming that travel
habits are stable across the
year. Some estimations and
assumptions that lead to
high uncertainty. Considered
adequate as <1% of scope 3.
0%
C11 –
distributed
natural gas –
Auckland
Gas
distributed
via Auckland
network
Direct use-
phase method
– fuel
Firstgas OATIS
system
MfE (2025) –
IPCC AR5
Quantities of gas distributed
via Auckland network.
Calculation assumes all gas
is converted to CO₂ via either
combustion or chemical
process by consumers. Low
uncertainty.
100%
C15 –
Bluecurrent
50% of
scope 1 and
2 emissions
from
Bluecurrent
Investment-
specific
method
Invoice-and-FSP-
based records
provided by
Bluecurrent
MfE (2025) –
IPCC AR5
Actual energy consumption
provided by Bluecurrent.
Gas metering fugitive
emissions based on multiple
assumptions and estimates,
which leads to medium
uncertainty. Considered
adequate.
100%
1. Proportion of emissions calculated using calculation methods based on data specific to suppliers or other value chain partners. Remaining
emissions are calculated using internal or average data.
Table 4 (continued): Emissions calculation methods, data quality and sources for FY2025 reporting. For years before FY2025, refer
to previous GHG reports.
EMISSIONS
CALCULATED USING
DATA PROVIDED
BY VALUE CHAIN
PARTNERS
1
2. Operational boundaries (continued)
Summary of
emissions
Organisational
boundaries
Data collection
and quantification
References
and Appendix
GHG emissions
calculation
and results
GHG emissions
reductions
Operational
boundaries
11
3. Data collection and quantification
Information management procedures
Vector uses an internal process guideline for GHG emissions
accounting to ensure consistency in the preparation of our
GHG inventory. This was developed following a screening of
Vector’s full value chain emissions and setting the base year to
FY2020. The document outlines responsibilities, and defines
thresholds, calculation methods and recalculation policy, among
other details that ensure conformance with the GHG Protocol
Standards over time.
Vector uses the software solution BraveGen to collect data and
calculate our carbon footprint. Activity data is gathered and
uploaded either by Vector’s staff across all business areas, or
directly by suppliers. All data is reviewed by the GHG accounting
team before final upload onto the system. Emissions are
calculated automatically within BraveGen by multiplying the
provided activity data with each applicable emission factor.
These factors are updated every year as required by our GHG
accounting team.
Some material changes, such as the change in the GWP of
methane from 25 to 28 in FY2024, are overseen by Vector’s
board audit committee as a key judgment.
Prior to KPMG’s assurance of the GHG inventory, the inventory
is analysed by our GHG accounting team for trends and missing
data. Upon completed assurance, Vector’s executive team and
board are informed of changes in emissions over time. Both the
internal GHG emissions accounting guide as well as our emissions
reduction strategy are reviewed and updated frequently.
Methodologies
Most of Vector’s GHG emissions are calculated by multiplying
activity data with appropriate emission factors. Examples of
activity data include kilowatt-hour (kWh) of electricity used,
volume of fuel used, or gigajoules (GJ) of gas distributed. Most
activity data is based on consumption data sourced from invoices
provided by suppliers, or internal reports.
An overview of sources used per category is included in table 4.
Most emission factors used are sourced from the latest
publications (at financial year end) by New Zealand’s Ministry
for the Environment (MfE) [4] and the UK’s Department of
Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) [5]. Exceptions are
outlined below:
‒ From March 2023, the majority of Vector group’s consumed
electricity is purchased from Ecotricity, a Toitū climate-
positive certified electricity retailer. Electricity consumed
via installation control points (ICPs) included on the Ecotricity
contract can be calculated as zero under market-based
reporting.
‒ Emissions from FY2025 electricity use not purchased from
Ecotricity are calculated using the Residual Supply Mix
emission factor as disclosed by the New Zealand Energy
Certificate System [6]. The residual factor is based on the
production year period April to March.
Emission factor sources and the underlying assessment report
for each scope and category are listed in table 4. The GWP time
horizon in all cases is 100 years.
Fugitive emissions from gas distribution (scope 1) as well as
emissions from ‘upstream-purchased materials and products’
and ‘upstream-purchased other goods and services’ (scope 3
– category 1) are subject to more complex calculations that are
described in the following two subsections.
Gas distribution fugitive emissions
Methods for calculating gas distribution fugitive emissions
(methane leaks) are unique to gas distribution pipeline
companies and will be briefly described here for completeness.
In FY2021, Vector undertook a comprehensive study to model
methane leaks on our gas network. The model created a
fluid-dynamics based, quasi-digital twin of the network, which
enabled us to identify and quantify methane leaks.
Vector is aligned to the guidelines of the Technical Association
of the European Gas Industry (Marcogaz [7]), and the Oil and Gas
Methane Partnership methodology (OGMP 2.0 [8]), which are
found to be the most comprehensive and applicable to Vector’s
gas network. Marcogaz is currently in the process of integrating
these guidelines into the CEN/ TC 234 European Technical
Standard for Gas Infrastructure.
This quantification method requires Vector to split the gas
network into groups of assets and corresponding categories of
emissions that can be expected from these groups.
The emissions categories can be defined as:
Pipe permeation: Permeation of gas through the membrane
material of the polyethylene pipes
Leaks detected by systematic surveys: Found using street
evaluation laser methane assessment (SELMA), which are
conducted on a three-monthly basis for intermediate pressure
(IP) systems and six-monthly for all other sections of the pipeline
District regulator stations: Operational emissions approximated
using the American Petroleum Institute Compendium of
Greenhouse Gas Emissions [9]
Third-party damages (TPD): Leaks when gas pipelines are
damaged by third parties
Operational/maintenance emissions: Vented natural gas during
commissioning, decommissioning, and asset maintenance
Public-reported escapes: Leaks detected by members of
the public
Valves and fittings: Additional leaks from seal failures of valves
and fittings.
Summary of
emissions
Organisational
boundaries
Operational
boundaries
References
and Appendix
GHG emissions
calculation
and results
GHG emissions
reductions
Data collection
and quantification
12Vector GHG Emissions Inventory Report FY2025
Table 5: Breakdown of gas distribution fugitive emissions by category in tCO₂e
EMISSIONS SOURCEFY2020FY2021FY2022FY2023FY2024FY2025
Total 18,313 13,507 16,218 13,323 9,379 7,887
Pipe permeation 54 54 55 55 38 46
Leaks detected in systematic surveys 11,981 6,739 8,446 7,491 3,931 2,914
Operational/maintenance emissions 12 15 10 5 5 2
Third-party damages 4,698 5,242 6,245 4,353 3,958 3,325
Public-reported escapes 23 17 21 21 19 151
District regulator stations (DRS)
(maintenance and operation)
847 742 737 688 708 718
Valves and fittings 698 698 704 710 720 730
As it is not feasible to measure every variable, key assumptions
are made. The following assumptions have a material impact
on the overall data:
‒Duration of leak detected during systematic surveys: When
a leak is found on a routine survey, there is no knowledge of
when the leak started. However, we do know when the pipe
was last surveyed, and, assuming a normal distribution, can
assume that on average the duration of a leak is half the time
since the last survey. For example, Vector runs routine surveys
for most sections of the pipeline every six months. We can
therefore approximate that the average leak duration is three
months. This is in alignment with Marcogaz guidelines.
‒Average size of leak found on systematic surveys: Most of the
historical records of the detected leaks have been a result of
loose fittings. Vector has conducted several review sessions
internally and across the industry and found that the most
applicable assumption is in the RR630-HSE, UK standard.
Within that, we take a conservative estimate of a hole size
of 2 mm2.
‒Average size of leaks found from third-party damages:
Normalised across all third-party damages to 30 mm,
based on measured samples.
‒Permeability of the ground: 7,000 km of pipes run through
various ground and geological formations. An estimation of
soil permeability is made according to ISBN 0-486- 65675-6,
and based on the New Zealand soil map. We have conducted
actual field measurements to verify these assumptions.
This testing further improves our current reporting level
relative to the Marcogaz criteria and the OGMP 2.0 guidelines.
In FY2023, GNS Science conducted an independent review
of this methodology. This included a review of the Marcogaz
methodology that Vector is following in assessing emissions;
a review of Vector’s implementation of this methodology; an
assessment of Vector’s current level of reporting relative to
the Marcogaz criteria and the underlying standards; as well as
recommendations for future work that would improve Vector’s
emissions reporting and move Vector to a higher reporting level.
The key improvement opportunity identified is to obtain more
specific, local emission factors, with GNS Science’s overall finding
that Vector is currently operating at OGMP 2.0 Level 3 or slightly
above. Level 5 is the highest possible level that also requires the
use of site-level measurement to reconcile source and site-level
emission estimates.
Upstream-purchased materials and products
Methodologies to quantify emissions from purchased goods
and services vary depending on data availability from suppliers.
Those identified as key suppliers for a specific business unit,
either based on spend or the type and quantities of products
purchased, were contacted to request supplier-specific
emissions data.
Preference was given to data published in environmental
product declarations (EPDs), from which we extracted the GWP
for the manufacturing/production phase (A1 – A3; total GWP
where a breakdown was provided). Where supplier-specific EPDs
were not available, secondary emission factors from EPDs for
comparable products or underlying raw materials have been
used as proxy data.
Upstream-purchased other goods and services
Emissions from all remaining purchases were quantified using
the spend-based method. For FY2025, this calculation covers
around 32% (FY2024: 28%) of Vector’s annual spend and more
than 700 suppliers. It uses environmentally-extended input
output (EEIO) emission factors, which estimate GHG emissions
resulting from the production and upstream supply chain
activities of different products in an economy. For FY2025, we
used Eora MRIO 2022 scope 3 multipliers for New Zealand [10, 11]
and adjusted them for inflation to the midpoint of the financial
year. Emission factors were assigned based on a supplier’s main
business activity.
As more specific data becomes available, such as through
supplier release of EPDs, the emissions data for upstream-
purchased materials and products can be refined, therefore
reducing the percentage of emissions calculated using the
spend-based approach.
The approach we used for both sub-categories built on previous
work completed in FY2023 with the support of thinkstep-anz,
a trans-Tasman firm offering strategic advice on sustainability.
Note that emissions from fuel used by FSPs have been calculated
using supplier-specific data since FY2020 and have been
reported under scope 3 – category 1 in Vector’s GHG emissions
inventory since then.
3. Data collection and quantification (continued)
Summary of
emissions
Organisational
boundaries
Operational
boundaries
References
and Appendix
GHG emissions
calculation
and results
GHG emissions
reductions
Data collection
and quantification
13
7,887
Natural gas distribution
fugitive emissions
39,437
Electricity distribution losses
1,325
Stationary
combustion
647
Vehicle fleet
487
SF
6
leakage
39
Electricity
consumption
(market-based)
103
Other fugitive
emissions
4. GHG emissions calculation
and results
Base year
Vector’s base year for emissions reporting is FY2020, 1 July 2019
to 30 June 2020. This was the first year that the GHG inventory
included most material scope 3 emissions and forms the base
year for Vector’s emissions reduction target.
Changes to historic years
Vector recalculates emissions of historic years if the inventory
is affected by changes that in aggregate total 5% of our carbon
footprint. These changes can be structural (for example
acquisitions or divestments), changes in the way the inventory
is calculated, or discovery of omissions or errors. Vector might
decide to update historic years for changes below the threshold
for other reasons, such as consistency or clarity.
Recalculations were required this year as follows:
‒Because of the sale of the Ongas LPG business and shares
in Liquigas Limited, emissions created by these businesses
have been removed for all years from FY2020.
‒Emissions relating to the sold Natural Gas Trading contracts
have been removed from scope 3 for FY2022 to FY2024. There
is no impact on the base year given the earliest start date of
the sold contracts was 1 July 2021.
For an overview of all recalculations, including those from
previous years, see appendix 2.
FY2025 results
In FY2025, total GHG emissions for Vector came to 794,241 tCO
2
e.
This is a reduction of 54% from our base year in FY2020.
Scope 1
Vector’s direct emissions in FY2025 amount to 10,449 tCO
2
e,
a reduction from our base year by 54%. Explanations on the most
notable changes in emissions across scope 1 are outlined below.
Natural gas distribution fugitive emissions
Natural gas fugitive emissions have decreased by 57% between
FY2020 and FY2025. A large contributor to this reduction is
proactive pipeline surveying and other gas network operational
initiatives such as reducing response time.
Diesel use in generators
Stationary combustion decreased by 60% between FY2020 and
FY2025, largely driven by the switch from diesel generators to
mobile transformers on planned asset replacements.
SF₆ emissions
SF
6
emissions have decreased by 7% from the FY2020 base year.
Figure 3: Vector’s GHG emissions inventory FY2025, scope 1 and 2 only
Summary of
emissions
Organisational
boundaries
Operational
boundaries
Data collection
and quantification
References
and Appendix
GHG emissions
reductions
GHG emissions
calculation
and results
14Vector GHG Emissions Inventory Report FY2025
Distributed
natural gas
Upstream-purchased
other goods & services
Fuel used by field
service providers
Upstream-purchased
materials & products
Waste generated in
operations
Business travel
Employee commuting
and WFH
Bluecurrent
Fuel and energy-
related activities
647,278
Distributed natural gas
79,224
Upstream-
purchased other
goods & services
SCOPE 2 – 39,476SCOPE 1 – 10,449
53
202
666
729
642
6,0879,435
Scope 2
Scope 2 emissions are split into emissions from Vector’s own
consumption of electricity from the grid, and emissions from
distribution losses across Vector’s network.
Vector’s 21% increase in electricity distribution losses in FY2025
compared to FY2020 can be attributed to several factors,
including load profiles and distance to load. However, year-on-
year fluctuations in distributed losses are materially influenced
by the national electricity emission factor [4]. For example, the
emission factor used to calculate electricity distribution losses
rose by 38% between FY2024 and FY2025 owing to an increase in
the proportion of fossil-based generation.
Scope 3
Value chain emissions have decreased 55% relative to the FY2020
base year. The material category is the use of sold products,
which decreased 52% since FY2020, driven by the wind-down
and subsequent closure of Vector’s Natural Gas Trading business.
Further to this, there was a 16% reduction in gas distribution
emissions because of lower gas consumption in Auckland.
Figure 4: Vector’s GHG emissions inventory FY2025, scopes 1, 2 and 3
Table 6: Scope 1 and scope 2 FY2025 GHG emissions by
greenhouse gas. PFCs and NF₃ are not listed here as they
are not relevant to Vector’s activities. GWP conversion factors
are from the latest MfE guidance documents.
TOTAL FY2025tGWPtCO₂e
Scope 110,449
CO₂1,93311,933
CH₄282287,893
N₂O0.1226533
HFCS*0.05677 – 1,924103
SF₆0.0223,500487
Scope 2**39,476
CO₂38,337138,337
CH₄38281,065
N₂O0.2826574
Total tCO₂e49,925
* HFCs relate to a family of gases used in applications such as
refrigeration and air conditioning. Different applications use
different HFCs so we display a range here.
** Market-based method for electricity consumption. While location-
based electricity emissions are also included in our inventory, the
amounts in table 6 include only market-based emissions, as these
form part of our emissions reduction target.
4. GHG emissions calculation and results (continued)
Summary of
emissions
Organisational
boundaries
Operational
boundaries
Data collection
and quantification
References
and Appendix
GHG emissions
reductions
GHG emissions
calculation
and results
15
5. GHG emissions reductions
Emissions reduction target
In FY2021, Vector set an absolute emissions reduction target. That
target is for Vector to reduce our scope 1 and 2 emissions (excluding
electricity distribution losses) by 53.5% by FY2030 from a FY2020
baseline. The target was developed by thinkstep-anz in 2021, based
on a methodology published by the Science Based Target Initiative
(SBTi) and the SBTi’s then applicable guidance on reductions
required to be consistent with keeping global warming to 1.5°C.
Our target has not been validated by SBTi because SBTi’s
methodology provided for the inclusion of emissions related
to electricity distribution losses, which we have excluded.
Further detail regarding this exclusion is set out below.
The emissions reduction target does not rely on any offsets.
Vector does not have any interim targets.
In FY2025 we achieved our emissions reduction target, five years
ahead of the original FY2030 target date, with a reduction in our
scope 1 and 2 emissions (excluding distribution losses) of 55%
compared to the FY2020 base year. This was largely because of a
reduction in natural gas fugitive emissions, along with a reduction
in diesel-generation-related emissions.
Meeting the target in FY2025 does not guarantee that the
emissions reductions can be maintained in subsequent years.
There are key risks highlighted in table 7 that could result in Vector
missing our target in any given year.
Exclusion of electricity distribution losses from
our target
Electricity distribution losses are not like a water or gas leak; they
are an inherent characteristic of electricity distribution networks.
Although we can measure these losses, and report their associated
emissions based on New Zealand’s published electricity generation
emissions factor, we can never fully remove them. As distribution
losses are largely an inevitable by-product of electrical conduction,
Vector has elected to exclude emissions associated with such losses
from our emissions reduction target. This allows our target to focus
on emissions that we can more readily manage.
Additional information
Under the New Zealand Emissions Trading Scheme (NZ ETS),
Vector is obligated to surrender New Zealand Units (NZUs) for
emissions related to fugitive SF₆.
NZ ETS reporting is by calendar year, while Vector’s GHG emissions
reporting is by financial year (1 July to 30 June). For the 2024
calendar year, Vector surrendered NZUs to the value of 422 tCO₂e
related to fugitive SF₆ gases.
Assurance
Information subject to assurance by KPMG includes the summary
of emissions and sections 1 to 4. KPMG does not provide assurance
of this section of the GHG report.
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
Group emissionsFY2030 target
Emissions (tCO
₂
e)
FY30FY29FY28FY27FY26FY25FY24FY23FY22FY21FY20
FY2030 emissions
reduction target
FY2025FY2020
Emissions (tCO
e)
Electricity
consumption
(market-based)
Vehicle
fleet
Stationary
combustion
including
biogenic
carbon
Other
fugitive
emissions
SF
6
leakage
Natural gas
distribution
fugitive
emissions
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
Figure 5: (left) Emissions included in Vector’s emissions reduction target – scope 1 and 2 excluding distribution losses and their
comparison to the FY2020 base year. (right) Vector’s yearly scope 1 and 2 emissions excluding distribution losses since FY2020.
Emissions are in tCO₂e.
Summary of
emissions
Organisational
boundaries
Operational
boundaries
Data collection
and quantification
References
and Appendix
GHG emissions
calculation
and results
GHG emissions
reductions
16Vector GHG Emissions Inventory Report FY2025
Abatement
cost
$/tCO₂e/year
Abatement
potential
tCO₂e
Using mobile transformers as
opposed to diesel generators for
multi-day upgrades (2024)
Hybrid generator (in trial)
Transition remaining light
vehicle fleet to EV (2020 – 2027)
Transition vans and utes to
electric (when available)
3-month gas pipeline surveying (2027)
Vector headquarters to ‘6 Green Star’
building (2023)
Annual gas pipeline
surveying (2022)
6-month gas pipeline surveying (2024)
SF6
monitoring
Renewable-only
electricity (2023)
Uncosted emissions
Third-party
gas pipeline
damage
Public engagement on dial
before you dig (2023)
Completed
In progress
Planned
Other
fugitive
methane
Other
diesel
generation
$140/
tCO₂e
53.5%
Emissions
reduction
target
3-month high-pressure gas
pipeline surveying (2025)
Reducing unnecessary diesel
generation through process
optimisation (2021)
$0
-$1,000
-$2,000
$1,000
Figure 6: Vector’s marginal carbon cost abatement curve. The horizontal axis corresponds to Vector’s total FY2020 scope 1 and 2
emissions excluding electricity distribution losses. Each bar relates to a potential emissions reduction initiative where the thickness
of the bar details the amount of emissions reductions estimated to be possible as a result of the initiatives. The vertical axis
represents the estimated cost, with negative values indicating estimated cost savings. Initiatives are ordered left to right, from the
most cost-saving to the most expensive.
5. GHG emissions reductions (continued)
Marginal carbon abatement cost curve
In FY2022, Vector developed a carbon abatement cost curve to
help measure and understand our emissions reduction target
(scope 1 and 2 excluding electricity distribution losses) and
actions available to us to contribute to reaching that target.
This work identifies the financial impact of potential carbon
reduction activity across scope 1 and 2 emissions, using an
internal carbon cost of $140 per tCO₂e. This amount was
chosen as it aligns with the Climate Change Commission’s 2021
recommendations to government to meet its 2050 targets [12]
and is consistent with our internal carbon cost since FY2022. We
consider this internal carbon cost to still be appropriate.
Through this work, we identified emissions that could be reduced
while achieving cost savings for the group (those with negative
abatement cost), and others that were close to cost neutral (those
with bars close to $0/tCO₂e/year), with the balance assessed as
being more complex to abate given the availability of current
alternatives. While the data in the cost curve is updated based
on the latest information, it presents forward-looking estimates
of emissions reduction potential, as opposed to actual emissions
results. The estimates are also conservative, which explains
how we have already met our emissions reduction target, even
though we have not yet completed all the actions on the curve.
The cost curve was updated in FY2025 to include the sale of the
Ongas business – this removed any emissions reduction activities
associated with Ongas, along with a removal of corresponding
historic emissions.
A summary of key risks that may form a barrier to Vector
achieving its emissions reduction target is highlighted in table 7.
Changes in technology, project prices, emissions cost modelling,
new business innovation and a range of other factors may
alter the marginal carbon abatement cost curve in our
future disclosures.
Summary of
emissions
Organisational
boundaries
Operational
boundaries
Data collection
and quantification
References
and Appendix
GHG emissions
calculation
and results
GHG emissions
reductions
17
Table 7: Key risks that may form a barrier to Vector achieving our emissions reduction target
CARBON ABATEMENT RISK DESCRIPTION
Damage to high-
pressure pipelines
Damage to Vector’s high-pressure gas pipelines can release significant quantities of CO₂e.
For example, two leaks detected in FY2022 were responsible for the release of over 3,000 tCO₂e.
While we can reduce emissions over time on average, these high-volatility events can cause a
sudden spike in emissions for that reporting year. In addition, there is a risk that emissions from
third-party damages (such as a contractor digging into the pipe) remain high or increase, with
limited influence from Vector’s side.
Long-term SF₆ assets on
Vector’s network
Many of Vector’s SF₆ assets have a lifetime beyond 2030. It is challenging to replace all these
assets before FY2030, and leaks can be largely unpredictable. Although we have installed some
monitoring devices that alert us of leaks quickly, there is still a risk that leaks could increase and
keep occurring. SF₆ has an emission factor 23,500 times that of CO₂; therefore, even small leaks
of SF₆ can have material impacts on our emissions inventory.
5. GHG emissions reductions (continued)
Summary of
emissions
Organisational
boundaries
Operational
boundaries
Data collection
and quantification
References
and Appendix
GHG emissions
calculation
and results
GHG emissions
reductions
18Vector GHG Emissions Inventory Report FY2025
References
1World Resources Institute and World Business Council for Sustainable Development. 2004. The Greenhouse Gas Protocol:
A Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard, USA.
2World Resources Institute and World Business Council for Sustainable Development. 2015. GHG Protocol Scope 2 guidance:
An amendment to the GHG Protocol Corporate Standard, USA.
3World Resources Institute and World Business Council for Sustainable Development. 2011. Corporate Value Chain (Scope 3)
Accounting and Reporting Standard, USA.
4New Zealand Government – Ministry for the Environment. 2025. Measuring emissions guide: 2025, Wellington: Ministry for
the Environment.
5
UK Government – Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. 2025. Greenhouse gas reporting: conversion factors
2025. Accessed 21 July 2025 gov.uk/government/publications/greenhouse-gas-reporting-conversion-factors-2025
6
BraveTrace – New Zealand Energy Certificate System. Accessed 24 July 2025
bravetrace.co.nz/residual-supply-mix/
7Technical Association of the European Natural Gas Industry (Marcogaz). 2019. Assessment of methane emissions for gas
Transmission and Distribution system operators.
8
The Oil & Gas Methane Partnership 2.0. Accessed 21 July 2025 ogmpartnership.org/resources
9 American Petroleum Institute. 2009. Compendium of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Estimation Methodologies for the Oil and
Natural Gas Industry.
10Lenzen M, Kanemoto K, Moran D and Geschke A. 2012. Mapping the structure of the world economy. Environmental Science &
Technology 46(15), pp 8374–8381.
11Lenzen M, Kanemoto K, Moran D and Geschke A. 2013. Building Eora: A Global Multi-regional Input-Output Database at High
Country and Sector Resolution. Economic Systems Research 25:1, pp 20-49.
12New Zealand Government – Climate Change Commission. 2021. Ināia tonu nei: a low emissions future for Aotearoa.
Summary of
emissions
Organisational
boundaries
Operational
boundaries
Data collection
and quantification
GHG emissions
calculation
and results
GHG emissions
reductions
References
and Appendix
19
Appendix
WHOLLY OWNED
AND JOINT
OPERATIONS
CARBON
FOOTPRINT
RELEVANT
FURTHER INFO ON
CARBON FOOTPRINT
RELEVANCE
ECONOMIC
INTEREST
HELD
PRINCIPAL
ACTIVITY
VECTOR ORG
STRUCTURE
NAME
HOLDING
COMPANY
NAME
Vector LimitedyesOperational control approach
(100% for Vector’s scopes 1,2,3)
100%Parent companyVector LimitedN/A
Vector
Investment
Holdings Limited
no No emissions from operations 100%Holding
company
N/A – Holding
company
Vector Limited
Vector Gas
Trading Limited
yes –
until 1
July 2024
Operational control approach
(100% for Vector’s scopes 1,2,3)
100%Holding
company
N/A - Holding
company
Vector
Investment
Holdings Limited
Vector Advanced
Metering Assets
(Australia)
Limited
no No emissions from operations 100%Investment
company
N/A Vector
Investment
Holdings Limited
Vector MeterCo
Limited
no No emissions from operations 100%Holding
company
N/A – Holding
company
Vector
Investment
Holdings Limited
Bluecurrent
Holdings NZ
Limited
yesNo operational control.
Proportional (50%) scope 1
and 2 emissions accounted
for under scope 3, category 15
50%Metering
services
N/AVector MeterCo
Limited
Bluecurrent
Holdings
(Australia) Pty
Limited
yesNo operational control.
Proportional (50%) scope 1
and 2 emissions accounted
for under scope 3, category 15
50%Metering
services
N/AVector MeterCo
Limited
Vector SPV No.1
Limited (formerly
On Gas Limited)
noNo emissions from operations100%Holding
company
N/A - Holding
company
Vector
Investment
Holdings Ltd
Vector
Communications
Limited
yesOperational control approach
(100% for Vector’s scopes 1,2,3)
100%Tele-
communications
Vector FibreVector Limited
Vector Energy
Solutions Limited
no No emissions from operations 100%Holding
company
N/A – Holding
company
Vector Limited
Vector Energy
Solutions
(Australia) Pty
Limited
no No emissions from operations 100%Energy solutions
services
N/AVector Energy
Solutions
Limited
Vector SPV No.2
Limited (formerly
Powersmart NZ
Limited)
yes –
until 30
December
2023*
Operational control approach
(100% for Vector’s scopes 1,2,3)
100%Holding
company
N/A - Holding
company
Vector Energy
Solutions
Limited
E-Co Products
Group Limited
no No emissions from operations 100%Holding
company
N/A – Holding
company
Vector Energy
Solutions
Limited
Appendix 1: Vector’s subsidiaries as at 30 June 2025
* Emissions from operations before the business closure are captured in Vector’s carbon footprint.
Summary of
emissions
Organisational
boundaries
Operational
boundaries
Data collection
and quantification
GHG emissions
calculation
and results
GHG emissions
reductions
References
and Appendix
20Vector GHG Emissions Inventory Report FY2025
Appendix 1 (continued): Vector’s subsidiaries as at 30 June 2025
WHOLLY OWNED
AND JOINT
OPERATIONS
CARBON
FOOTPRINT
RELEVANT
FURTHER INFO ON
CARBON FOOTPRINT
RELEVANCE
ECONOMIC
INTEREST
HELD
PRINCIPAL
ACTIVITY
VECTOR ORG
STRUCTURE
NAME
HOLDING
COMPANY
NAME
Cristal Air
International
Limited (HRV)
yesOperational control approach
(100% for Vector’s scopes 1,2,3)
100%Ventilation,
heating and
water systems
sales and
assembly
HRVE-Co Products
Group Limited
Vector
Technology
Solutions Limited
yesOperational control approach
(100% for Vector’s scopes 1,2,3)
100%Technology
services
Vector
Technology
Solutions
Vector Limited
Vector
Technology
Solutions
Holdings USA LLC
noNo emissions from operations100%Holding
company
N/A – Holding
company
Vector
Technology
Solutions
Limited
VTS USA LLCnoNo emissions from operations100%Technology
services
N/AVector
Technology
Solutions
Holdings USA
LLC
Equalise Cyber
Security Limited
yesOperational control approach
(100% for Vector’s scopes 1,2,3)
100%Cyber security
solutions
Cyber security
solutions
Vector Limited
Vector ESPS
Trustee Limited
noNo emissions from operations100%Trustee
company
N/A – Trustee
company
Vector Limited
Vector Auckland
Property Limited
noNo emissions from operations100%Assets holding
company
N/A – Holding
company
Vector Limited
Vector Northern
Property Limited
noNo emissions from operations100%Assets holding
company
N/A – Holding
company
Vector Limited
Summary of
emissions
Organisational
boundaries
Operational
boundaries
Data collection
and quantification
GHG emissions
calculation
and results
GHG emissions
reductions
References
and Appendix
21
Appendix 2: Summary of GHG emissions inventory recalculations across years
RECALCULATION
DESCRIPTION
RESULTING CHANGE
IN INVENTORY
YEAR OF
REPORTED
CHANGE
SCOPE(S) AND
YEAR(S) AFFECTED
Structural change: Divestment of
Treescape shares
Recalculation of scope 3 – category
15. Voluntary recalculation for clarity
FY2022Scope 3 – category 15
FY2020: -3,069 tCO₂e
FY2021: -2,956 tCO₂e
Structural change: Sale of a 50%
interest in Bluecurrent, with loss
of operational control
Removing Bluecurrent emissions
from scope 1, 2 and 3, and adding
proportional scope 1 and 2 emissions
in relation to the investment to
scope 3 – category 15
FY2023Removal of Bluecurrent emissions
across scopes 1, 2 and 3
FY2020: -5,017 tCO₂e
FY2021: -5,099 tCO₂e
FY2022: -4,824 tCO₂e
50% of Bluecurrent’s scope 1 and 2
moved to scope 3 – category 15
FY2020: +700 tCO₂e
FY2021: +771 tCO₂e
FY2022: +809 tCO₂e
Improvement of data quality
and data availability for material
emissions source
Inclusion of additional purchased
goods and services emissions to
scope 3 – category 1
FY2023Scope 3 – category 1
FY2020: +91,205 tCO₂e
FY2021: +83,199 tCO₂e
FY2022: +88,953 tCO₂e
Quantification of leaks identified
subsequent to year-end
Update to gas fugitive emissions to
include data quantified after financial
year-end FY2022
FY2023Scope 1
FY2022: +3,040 tCO₂e
Improvement in the accuracy of
emission factors
Increase in scope 1 emissions
resulting from the change in GWP
for CH₄ between AR4 and AR5
FY2024Scope 1
FY2020: +1,945 tCO₂e
FY2021: +1,433 tCO₂e
FY2022: +1,724 tCO₂e
FY2023: +1,415 tCO₂e
Improvement in the accuracy of
emission factors and changes to
calculation methodology
Increase in scope 1 emissions
because of the change in GWP for
SF₆ between AR4 and AR5 as well as
update to SF₆ emissions to change
from calendar year data to financial
year data
FY2024Scope 1
FY2020: +99 tCO₂e
FY2021: +671 tCO₂e
FY2022: +223 tCO₂e
FY2023: -880 tCO₂e
Structural change: Sale of
remaining Natural Gas Trading
contracts
Removing Natural Gas Trading
emissions from contracts that
were sold (as opposed to terminated
at the end of the contract) from
scope 3 under category 1 (purchased
natural gas) and category 11 (use of
sold products)
FY2025Scope 3
FY2022: -285,409 tCO₂e
FY2023: -338,869 tCO₂e
FY2024: -347,082 tCO₂e
Structural change: Sale of the
Ongas LPG business and shares
in Liquigas Limited
Removing Ongas emissions from
scopes 1, 2 and 3, and removing
Liquigas emissions from scope 3 –
category 15
FY2025Scopes 1, 2 and 3
FY2020: -188,419 tCO₂e
FY2021: -187,594 tCO₂e
FY2022: -187,674 tCO₂e
FY2023: -191,594 tCO₂e
FY2024: -197,927 tCO₂e
Summary of
emissions
Organisational
boundaries
Operational
boundaries
Data collection
and quantification
GHG emissions
calculation
and results
GHG emissions
reductions
References
and Appendix
22Vector GHG Emissions Inventory Report FY20
[TRUNCATED]
Data sourced from publicly available filings. Our datasets may not be complete. Automated analysis can produce errors. If you believe any data on this page is incorrect, please contact us at hello@nzxplorer.co.nz. For informational purposes only. Not investment advice.