Contact Energy Limited logo

Contact31+ Strategy, Capital Markets Day 2025

Investor Presentation24 November 2025CENUtilities

Contact Energy Limited Level 2 Harbour City Tower, 29 Brandon Street, Wellington 6011 | PO Box 10742, Wellington 6143
P: +64 4 499 4001 | W: contactenergy.co.nz


25 November 2025


Contact31+ Strategy, Capital Markets Day 2025

Contact Energy (Contact) has released its strategy to lead New Zealand’s renewable energy

future; Contact31+.

Contact has outlined its plans to extend its advantage as New Zealand’s geothermal leader,

lead on new flexibility in New Zealand, build into new demand with wind and solar and lead

the energy transition at home.

“Over the last five years, we have delivered strongly against our Contact26 strategy, with

this past year being one of the most significant in Contact’s history,” said CEO Mr Mike

Fuge.

“We have to keep the momentum going. New Zealand needs more renewable energy and

flexibility as the energy transition continues. We have a clear plan to deliver this with

Contact31+.”

Contact is hosting its Capital Markets Day 2025 today. The presentation materials are

attached, focusing on the Contact31+ strategy.

Presentations will run from 10am to 2.30pm NZDT. A livestream of the day can be accessed

by registering here.

A recording will also be posted to the investor presentations page of the Contact website.



Investor enquiries Media enquiries

Shelley Hollingsworth Louise Wright

Head of Strategy and Investor Relations Head of Communications and Reputation

+64 27 227 2429 +64 21 840 313

investor.centre@contactenergy.co.nz media@contactenergy.co.nz

---

1
Contact Energy

Capital Markets Day

25


November 2025

2
Disclaimer and important information

While all reasonable care has been taken in compiling this presentation, neither Contact

nor any of its directors, employees, shareholders nor any other person gives any

representation as to the accuracy or completeness of this information or accepts any

liability for any errors or omissions.

This presentation may contain certain forward-looking statements with respect of a variety

of matters. All such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks,

significant uncertainties, assumptions, contingencies, and other factors, many of which are

outside the control of Contact, which may cause the actual results or performance of

Contact to be materially different from any future results or performance expressed or

implied by such forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements speak only

as of the date of this presentation. Except as required by law or regulation (including the

NZX Listing Rules and the ASX Listing Rules), Contact undertakes no obligation to update

these forward-looking statements for events or circumstances that occur subsequent to

the date of this presentation or to update or keep current any of the information

contained herein.

Any estimates or projections as to events that may occur in the future (including

projections of revenue, expense, net income and performance) are based upon the best

judgement of Contact from the information available as of the date of this presentation.

EBITDAF, free cash flow and operating free cash flow are financial measures that are “non-

GAAP (generally accepted accounting practice) financial information” under Guidance

Note 2017: “Disclosing non-GAAP financial information” published by the New Zealand

Financial Markets Authority, “non-IFRS financial information” under ASIC Regulatory Guide

230: “Disclosing non-IFRS financial information” and “non-GAAP financial measures” within

the meaning of Regulation G under the U.S. Exchange Act of 1934.

Such financial information and financial measures (including EBITDAF, free cash flow and

operating free cash flow) do not have standardised meanings prescribed under New Zealand

equivalents to International Financial Reporting Standards (“NZ IFRS”), Australian Accounting

Standards (“AAS”) or International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) and therefore, may

not be comparable to similarly titled measures presented by other entities, and should not be

construed as an alternative to other financial measures determined in accordance with NZ

IFRS, AAS or IFRS accounting practice) measures. Information regarding the usefulness,

calculation and reconciliation of these measures is provided in the supporting material.

This presentation does not constitute financial or investment advice. This presentation does

not constitute an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy, Contact securities and may

not be relied on in connection with any purchase of a Contact security.

Numbers in the presentation have not all been rounded and might not appear to add.

All references to $ are New Zealand dollar unless stated otherwise.

All trademarks, service marks and company names are the property of their respective

owners. All company, product and service names used in this presentation are for

identification purposes only. Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply

endorsement or that they are or will be customers of Contact and reflects public

announcements of intention only.

3
Financial framework

for growth

Matt Forbes

Chief Financial Officer

Tech advantage

John Clark

Chief Generation Officer

Tighe Wall

Chief Technology Officer

Agenda

Welcome

Introducing Contact31+

Mike Fuge

Chief Executive Officer

Relationships with

our stakeholders

Chris Abbott

Chief Corporate Affairs Officer

Renewables

and flexibility

Dorian Devers

Chief Renewable Growth Officer

Leading the energy

transition at home

Carolyn Luey

Chief Retail Officer

Jan Bibby

Chief People Experience Officer

Matt Bolton

Manawa Integration Director

John Clark

Chief Generation Officer

Manawa integration

update

4
Introducing

Contact31+

Mike Fuge

Chief Executive Officer

5
Key messages

Contact26 has transformed us into a

bigger, cleaner and stronger company

The market needs more renewables and

flexibility as New Zealand’s energy transition

continues

We are well positioned to capture the

market opportunity, with clear advantages

that distinguish us from competitors

We have a clear plan to go after this

opportunity – introducing Contact31+

5

6
3

2

4

Investment and earnings performance

Decarbonisation and renewable growth

1

Contact26: Leading decarbonisation, renewable

growth and delivering value for our investors

Shareholder returns

Retail

Total retail

connections

4


Contact Mobile

connections

Households on

Time of Use plans

3 projects under

construction,

battery, solar

and geothermal

2 new major

geothermal plants

online adding

~2TWh of generation

11.8+ TWh p.a.

of generation

expected from FY26

>95% renewable

1

Maintained market leading cost-to-serve

30% lower than next competitor

5


1. Assuming mean hydrology and wind conditions. | 2. Normalised and expected earnings, assuming mean hydrology and wind conditions and excluding one-off Manawa transaction and

integration costs of $35M. | 3.


Includes forecast growth capex spend in FY26. | 4. Excludes Simply Energy connections. | 5. Based on total retail opex per connection in FY25. | 6. Dividend

indication only. All dividend decisions are a matter for the Board at the conclusion of each reporting period.

EBITDAF

2

$980M

FY26e, up $427M

77% from FY21

Dividend 40cps

FY26e

6

, up 5cps

14% from FY21

202020212022202320242025

Accumulated capital gain

Accumulated dividend

Total shareholder return (FY21 – FY25)

4%

5%

4%

4%

4%

%

Dividend yield

Normalised and expected

642k13k144k

$2B

Cumulative growth capex

invested FY21 – FY26e

3

30 June

2025

7
2

Contact in FY26

Contact in FY21

1

Contact26: Contact is now bigger, cleaner and stronger

New Zealand’s most diversified renewable generator

post Manawa Energy and renewable builds

81% renewable generation

EBITDAF $553M

NPAT $187m

Normalised and expected EBITDAF $980M

1

$945M after one-off Manawa costs​ FY26e

FY26 generation is expected to be

>95% renewable

1

Retail multi-product offerings now include mobile

642k total connections as at start of year

3

8.4TWh of generation across hydro,

geothermal and thermal plants

FY26 expected generation 11.8TWh across hydro,

geothermal, solar and thermal plants and wind PPAs

1

Strong generation portfolio but with limited

geographic and tech diversity

5x geothermal

stations

1x hydro

scheme

2x thermal baseload

2x peaking stations

3x thermal

peaking stations

4

26 x hydro

schemes

7x geothermal

stations

1x battery1x solar

In construction:

Retail multi-product offerings across

broadband, gas and electricity

508k total connections as at start of year

2

FY21

1. Assuming mean hydrology and wind conditions and excluding any short-term acquired generation purchases e.g. fuel replacement via ASX, which will reflect the renewable mix of the market. | 2. As at

30 June 2020. | 3. As at 30 June 2025. Excludes Simply Energy connections. | 4. While, in addition, Contact still owns its baseload Taranaki Combined Cycle gas plant (TCC), preparations are underway for

plant closure in the next 2-3 months.

Wind

PPAs

FY26

1x geothermal

8
There is a compelling market opportunity

supporting Contact31+ ambitions

1. New Zealand Aluminium Smelters Ltd at Tiwai Point.

3-5TWh of new demand over the next 5 years is

expected to underpin new development, driven

largely by gas electrification

The energy transition is leading to

increasingly volatile renewable supply

that requires more intra-day firming

Customer needs and behaviours are

changing, as they electrify and increasingly

manage their energy use

We have better clarity on key market risks

(e.g., NZAS

1

operations, government policy)

providing confidence to grow and invest

40

45

50

55

60

65

70

202520302035204020452050

TWh of electricity demand

Disorderly decarbonisationAccelerated renewables

Slow transitionMBIE EDGS reference

Next ~5 years

~5-10 years

~10+ years

Key trends:

•Accelerated renewables: significant growth in demand as New Zealand

electrifies at pace

•Disorderly decarbonisation: slower demand growth scenario, reflecting

demand exit and delay to committed decarbonisation projects

•Slow transition: sharp slow-down in transition and cancellation of near-

term committed projects

We considered the key trends under Contact’s three

market scenarios:

9
The impacts of the energy transition have become more

evident, with increasing wholesale price volatility

0

100

200

300

400

500

FY16FY18FY20FY22FY24

Monthly average spot price

Source: EMI wholesale price data (OTA node), MBIE electricity & gas statistics and 2P reserves.

1. Forecast under Contact’s disorderly decarbonisation scenario.

Wind and solar expected

to comprise ~10TWh by

FY35

Annual gas production, PJ

Gas supply is declining

~20% year-on-year

Wholesale electricity spot price, monthly

average, $/MWh

This is driving more volatile

prices across seasons

Grid electricity production (including supply,

demand and losses), TWh

There is increasing investment

in renewables to meet demand

Seasonal spread

is widening

199020002010202020302040

0

50

100

150

200

250

Winter peak

Summer low

Actual production, PJ

Future

projection, PJ

9

10

10

10

6

3

3

3

4

5

6

7

1

1

FY25

1

1

FY27

1

1

2

FY31

1

1

2

FY35

1

4343

45

47

OtherWindSolarThermalGeothermalHydro

10
At the same time, customers are accelerating electrification

and increasingly managing their energy use

1. Growth in BEV from 2021 to 2024 was 32.1% (27,495 BEV in 2021 to 83,806 in 2024). EVDB EV Market Stats (2025), EECA.

$500M

Committed

investment in

electrification by

major industry

players towards FY30

4x

Good Plans (Time of Use)

customers since 2022, as

customers increasingly

participate in their energy

management

~30%

Cumulative

annual growth

in EV sales in

2021-2024

1

~1

TWh

Demand response now in

the market, with industrial

take-up of flexible, seasonal

and/or off-peak structures

increasing

New Zealand Aluminium Smelter at Tiwai Point

Contact’s EV charging partnership with bp

More than

More than

11
Grid electricity demand forecast is

to grow by 3-5TWh to 2030

Electricity demand is expected to grow by up to ~5TWh

by FY30, with >3TWh tied to known and committed sources

1. MBIE EDGS reference case used as a proxy for market expectations given its use by Transpower for capital investment planning. | 2. Forecast does not

include assumptions around potential industrial demand loss or line losses. | 3. Includes residential EV charging.

41

42

43

44

45

46

47

CY20CY21CY22CY23CY24CY25CY26CY27CY28CY29CY30

41.6

1.2

1.1

0.9

1.2

0.2

CY30

46.1

Actual demand data (EMI)

Contracted / under construction demand

MBIE EDGS 2024 – Reference scenario

New Zealand grid electricity demand growth over time

1

, TWh/year

Additional

demand growth

forecasted by

MBIE

Known and

committed

new demand

CY24 demand

Breakdown of new-to-grid electricity demand in 2030

2

, TWh/year

Dairy, data centres, metals and residential

sector expected to drive new demand

Residential

3

Data centres

Metals

Dairy electrification

12
We have better clarity across key market

risks, providing confidence to grow and invest

NZAS extended

operations

NZAS to remain

operational under

new long-term deal,

alongside an innovative

demand response

agreement creating

additional flexibility to

improve New Zealand’s

energy security

Stable outcome from

Government-led review

Government

commissioned Frontier

Economics report, found

current market design is

working well to promote

investment in additional

generation

BCG: Energy to Grow

report released

Report shows New

Zealand is developing

renewable generation

at the fastest rate in its

history and highlights

market challenges are

largely due to the rapid

decline of the gas

market

Huntly Firming

Option signed

Agreement signed

between major

generators to secure

the long-term future

of Huntly and manage

dry year risk through

the energy transition

Market

evolution

Effect

MAY

2024

AUG

2025

OCT

2025

NOV

2025

New Zealand will have a general election in 2026 and the electricity sector is likely to remain in focus. While radical proposals may be floated, we expect

mainstream parties to draw on the Government-led review and the BCG report to understanding the challenges faced by the sector and the investment required.

13
Contact is well positioned to capture the market opportunity

1. Reflects FY26e output by technology as indicated in August 2025. Assumes mean hydrology and wind conditions. | 2. Excludes under construction projects. Also excludes 3rd party solar purchases, pre-pipeline

opportunities and other prospects where access is not yet secured. The large majority of options in these pipelines remain subject to resource consent approvals. | 3. Based on total retail opex per connection in

FY25. | 4. Consumer NZ retailer survey April 2025.

New Zealand’s leader

in geothermal

operations and capabilities

Trusted retailer

with leading

cost-to-serve

Most diversified

portfolio in New Zealand

Largest national

renewable pipeline

43%

50%

5%

2%

Only New Zealand player

with geothermal, thermal,

hydro and wind generation

Geothermal

Hydro

Thermal

Wind (PPAs)

Contact’s portfolio

1

GeothermalWindSolar

Renewable energy

generation pipeline

2

, TWh

~50%

of national

geothermal

generation FY25

~30%

lower cost-to-serve

than peers

3

~80%

of national

geothermal output

growth since FY15

3rd

Most Loved &

Trusted

Energy Brand

4

+ solar, battery and

geothermal builds underway

49% of total

Battery capacity pipeline

2

, MW

62% of total

Competitor

1

Competitor

2

Competitor

3

Competitor

3

Competitor

1

Competitor

2

173732

900100300150

14
Empowered

people and leaders

Unite our people behind Contact31+

and develop New Zealand’s

best energy leaders

Relationships

with our stakeholders

Maintain enduring trust with

stakeholders, investing for secure,

affordable renewable energy while

upholding our environmental

commitment

Productivity

Drive disciplined growth by

simplifying processes and

deploying automation

Tech advantage

Establish a distinctive edge in

data and AI on a simplified and

secure technology platform

Extend our advantage

as New Zealand’s

geothermal leader

Scale on high-quality existing

fields, explore new options,

and continue to improve our

cost-leadership position​

Build into new demand

with wind and solar

Deliver lowest-cost diversified wind

and rapidly deploy solar, anchored on

long-term industrial partnerships​

Lead the energy

transition at home

Empower our customers to shift

energy use, while making every

interaction easy and personal

Lead on new flexibility

in New Zealand

Accelerate batteries, build

advantage in hydro flex and

maintain gas flex, optimising our

portfolio in real time​​

Underpinned by continued operational excellence across our diverse and resilient portfolio

Leading New Zealand’s renewable energy future

Contact31+

Enablers

Strategic pillars

15
Contact31+ will deliver the highest value

outcomes for our investors and New Zealand

250MW+

geothermal

delivered / committed

500MW

batteries

online

500MW+

wind

delivered / committed

450MWac

solar

delivered

Target

renewable

energy

outcomes

Target

financial

outcomes

Select target FY31 outcomes under Contact31+

Subject to future investment decisions

1

$90 per

customer

retail cost-to-serve

2

$1.3-1.4B

EBITDAF

fully-ramped

on exit

3


+300bps

ROIC

versus

historical

>50cps

dividend

4


1. These outcomes are dependent on a number of future investment decisions which will be considered by the Board in isolation with all

information available at the time. Pending appropriate market conditions and projects meeting returns thresholds. | 2. Our cost-to-serve target

under Contact26 was on a per connection basis. Under Contact31+ we measure cost-to-serve on a per customer basis to enable a customer-centric

view of cost and facilitating comparison with global benchmarks. Cost-to-serve in FY25 was $113/customer and $83/connection. | 3. In-year FY31

EBITDAF target $1.2-$1.3B. | 4. All future dividend decisions are at the discretion of the Board at the time.

15

16
Renewables

and flexibility

Dorian Devers

Chief Renewable

Growth Officer

17
Contact26: We honed our project execution muscle

and are primed for continued renewable growth

Sequenced execution across technologies

Attractive returns on completed projects

101

102

103

104

105

Technology: Steam

Online: May 2024


Cost: $931M

Technology: Binary

Online: December 2024


Cost: $305M

20222023

Tauhara

Kōwhai

Park

Tauhara

online

Te Huka 3

20212025

Te Mihi Stage 2

+ Wairakei

extension

Glenbrook-

Ohurua

Te Huka 3

online

Tauhara

Te Huka 3

Tracking to plan on new builds

Glenbrook-Ohurua

Grid-scale battery

100MW / 200MWh

Target online Q1 CY26

Target IRR ~8-9% at FID

Te Mihi Stage 2

Geothermal plant

101MW / ~830GWh

Target online Q3 CY27

Target IRR ~10% at FID

Hydro refurbishment projects

(Clyde, Roxburgh, Manawa)

174MW

~1,450GWh

~13% IRR

1

51MW

2


~430GWh

~14% IRR

1

Post construction

1. Expected IRR over the life of the plant updated for actual construction costs, electricity price assumptions and output. | 2. Reflects maximum rated capacity (MCR). The plant has been producing at 54MW.

Post construction

FIDs:

Completion:

Kōwhai Park

Solar farm

150MWac / ~275GWh

Target online Q2 CY26

Target IRR ~12% at FID

2024

18
Largest renewable energy pipeline in New Zealand

Contact26: We built New Zealand’s largest renewable

energy pipeline – with premium attributes

Key advantages

Large scale projects:

With multiple 300+ MW wind and

150+ MWac solar options

Prime locations: Close to key

load centers (e.g., Auckland),

resulting in favourable location

factors and high capture rates

Source: Media, company websites and publications.

1. Excludes under construction projects. Also excludes 3rd party solar purchases, pre-pipeline opportunities and other prospects where access is not yet secured.

The large majority of options in these pipelines remain subject to resource consent approvals.

High-capacity factors:

Driven by high quality

renewable energy resources

~2~5~8

GeothermalWindSolar

Renewable energy generation pipeline

1

, TWh

Grid-scale battery pipeline

1

, MW

62%

49%

Competitor #1

Competitor #3

Competitor #2

Competitor #1

Competitor #3

Competitor #2

of total

Gentailer pipeline

of total

Gentailer pipeline

173732

900100300150

19
We are New Zealand’s leading geothermal

operator and developer

oBenefits of geo,

oTitle We are New Zealand’s leading geothermal operator & developer, has a

combination of:

▪Baseload energy regardless of weather

▪Renewable

▪Low -carbon with programme to go to no carbon

▪Low SRMC

▪Long -life plants (Wairakei plant operational since 1951 – phased

replacement underway,

▪X % of new zealand

▪Geo capabilities (reservoir management, development & design) banner

on the bottom

We have a suite of

capabilities across the

geothermal value chain that

we will leverage to capture

new opportunities

Reservoir management

•Operating experience on

the world’s second longest

electricity-producing field

•Dedicated, internationally

recognised sub-surface team

Well drilling and optimisation

•Continued R&D to lower cost

of operations

•Western Energy

3

is a leading

provider of well solutions

in New Zealand and offshore

Plant design and operations

•Our projects accounted for 88%

of New Zealand’s new

geothermal capacity brought

online FY21-25

Geothermal is an attractive source of firm,

baseload powerregardless of the weather,

with an average capacity factor of ~95%

1

Geothermal is long-lived and resilient. Contact’s

Wairakei station has been operational since 1958

Operating 7 geothermal stations

producing ~5TWh p.a. (12% of

New Zealand’s total generation)

Tauhara, 174MW

Te Huka 1&2, 26MW

Te Huka 3, 51MW

Ohaaki, 41MW

We are New Zealand’s

largest geothermal producer

Wairakei, 138MW

Te Mihi, 166MW

Poihipi, 53MW

Geothermal is renewable and low-carbon

with the potential to be zero-carbon with

reinjection technology

Geothermal has a low operating

cost of ~$10/MWh on average

2

Note: Capacity is shown as the maximum rated capacity (MCR or nameplate capacity) for each plant, which may differ from actual operating capacity in a range of circumstances.

1. Estimated average capacity factor for new stations. | 2. Reflects operating expense. Total cost including operating expense, carbon and maintenance capex is ~$20/MWh on average. |

3. Contact subsidiary company.

20
Priorities over next 5 years

Target milestones and outcomes

FY27

FY31

Contact31+ pillar:

Extend our advantage as New Zealand’s geothermal leader

Build out our existing consents

on Tauhara and Wairakei fields

Extend our high-quality, existing fields

by sustainablyincreasing consented fuel

Continue to improve our cost

leadershipposition through several

targeted initiatives

Explore new opportunities in New

Zealandwith landowners and

tangatawhenua

•Te Mihi Stage 2 on track

(for delivery FY28)

•Tauhara 2 FID taken

1

•Tauhara 3 option progressed

•Tauhara 2 delivered

1

•Te Mihi Stage 3 on track

(for delivery FY32)

1

•FID on Tauhara 3

1

•50+ MW greenfield options

1. Each FID to be considered in isolation with all information available at the time. Pending appropriate market conditions and projects meeting returns thresholds.

20

21
We will sustainably take existing geothermal fields

to their full potential over the next 5 years

~50MW / 415GWh

Under

construction

Up to 100MW / 830GWh

1

Target online Q3-CY27Earliest FID FY27

2. Tauhara 24. Tauhara 33. Te Mihi Stage 31. Te Mihi Stage 2

Earliest FID FY28Earliest FID FY30

Fluid take and (steam)

plant consented

Plant consented, fluid partially

consented. Assessment underway

to increase current fluid consent

Fluid partially consented.

Discussions underway to

increase consent on new areas

101MW / 830GWh

Project status

Location / type

Capacity / output

Project cost

Wairakei field

Partial replacement with

incremental uplift

Tauhara field

All new generation

Wairakei field

Partial replacement with

incremental uplift

Innovative procurement

Introducing greater competition

to OEMs in New Zealand

Innovative design

Focusing on a reduction

in steamfield costs

Efficiency - size and enthalpy

Maximising plant capacity factors

Cost

reduction

levers

Up to 100MW / 830GWh

2

$712M

3

$6.5 – 7.5M / MW

Tauhara field

All new generation

Incremental

uplift GWh (p.a)

~200GWh

Up to ~300GWh

415GWh

Up to 830GWh

Note: All capacity, output, uplift and cost figures for pre-FID projects are indicative only and subject to refinement.

1. Current fluid consent is expected to support an ~80MW plant. Capacity and output figures assume successful extension of the Wairakei field fluid take consent. | 2. Following the build of Tauhara 2, current

consents would leave fluid take of ~30MW equivalent. To expand operations, additional land access and consent is required. Plant capacity and output assumes successful extension of consent and additional

land access is secured. Cost of Tauhara 3 project may be elevated by transmission requirements. | 3. Includes all pre-FID sunk costs. Excludes capitalised interest.

Timing

22
And we’ll explore greenfield sites, identifying options to extend

our geothermal leadership beyond FY31

Current geothermal electricity generation, sites

in the Taupo Volcanic Zone

1

Approach to greenfield exploration

Apply our

leading

capabilities

and tech

Stage-gated

exploration process

Iwi

engagement

≤50

50-100

100-150

>150

Capacity, GWh:

Competitor

Contact

(existing site)

Plant owner:

1. Excludes Ngāwhā (which is in Northland) and embedded / industrial plants at Kawerau.

Targeting 50+ MW greenfield options by FY31 in the Taupo volcanic region

Stage-gated exploration process:

Negotiating access with landowners

Exploration / drilling

Applying for consent

Front-end engineering design

Taupo Volcanic Zone

Waikato region

Te Mihi

Poihipi

Te Huka

Wairakei

Tauhara

Ohaaki

Contact operates

New Zealand’s

largest geothermal

capacity (~650MW /

~50% of total

capacity)

There is room to expand, with

several high-quality greenfield

opportunities identified to meet

or exceed our 50+ MW target

23
Build into new demand with wind and solar

•Kōwhai Park solar delivered

1

•FID on 1-2 additional solar farms

2

•1+ wind farms consented

•0.5TWh industrial energy

demand electrified

•500+ MW wind delivered or

committed

2

•450MWac solar delivered

2

•1+ TWh industrial energy

demand electrified

Consent and bring to market large scale,

lowest cost, diversified wind to support New

Zealand’s economic growth and new demand

Rapidly deploy solar in the near term,backed

by summer-weighted demand

Deploy wind and solaroff-balancesheetand

with development partners to lower costs,

enhance returns and share expertise

Partner with customers in decarbonising

energy useby electrifying heat demand

Apply innovative procurement methods to

improve OEM competition in New Zealand

1. Expected online Q2 CY26. | 2. Each FID to be considered in isolation with all information available at the time. Pending appropriate market conditions and projects meeting returns thresholds.

Priorities over next 5 years

Target milestones and outcomes

FY27

FY31

Contact31+ pillar:

24
Overview of priority wind sites

Contact’s wind farm options are ~2-3x larger than New Zealand average.

Economies of scale are available in design and construction execution

We will use four key levers to deliver New

Zealand’s largest, and lowest cost wind farms

120MW

250 –

300MW

275MW

Average NZ

wind farm size

1


Southland

Huriwaka

Contact pipeline

average

>325MW

~2-3x

Others

Contact

1. Average of existing, committed, and (gentailer) consented wind farms in New Zealand. | 2. Kaihiku is 50:50 JV with Pioneer Energy. | 3. Legacy Manawa development options. |

4. Earliest FID dates are both shown as FY27 reflecting site optionality. Actual investment decisions will be sequenced.

Huriwaka

3


250 - 300MW

Earliest

FID: FY27

4

Source: Media, company websites and publications.

Pouto

>400MW

Hapuakohe

3


250 - 300MW

Kaihiku

2,3

300MW

Next-in-line sites

Other priority sites

Leading offtakers

Working with industrials to

provide economically

compelling renewable

electricity

Project finance

Off-balance sheet

funding to improve

project returns to

Contact by 200-300bps

2

3

4

Innovative

procurement

Introducing greater

competition to New

Zealand

1

Southland

>325MW

Earliest

FID: FY27

4

25
We will draw on our expanded wind development

capabilities and a maturity-driven partnership approach

Project development phase

Construction

Operations

Infrastructure funds

Developer (IPPs)

Iwi

Large scale industrials

OEM

Suitability of a development partner for wind will differ depending on the stage in the project life cycle at which the partnership is entered

Infrastructure plus funds

1


OEM

Developer (IPPs)

Contact’s wind development capabilities have been enhanced with the acquisition of Manawa

Combined Contact and

Manawa wind

development team

Roaring40s wind

development exclusive

consultancy

Collective

expertise of

Contact’s

wind team

•4.2GW of operational wind projects in Australia and

New Zealand, 40% of all operational installed capacity

•Average experience of 22 years (across development,

construction and operations)

Artist’s impression of Southland Wind

Project maturity

Intended partnering

stage for Southland Wind

Infrastructure plus funds

1


1. Infrastructure funds that seek involvement earlier in project maturity.

26
Our food processing electrification proposition aligns

solar generation with customer demand in summer

Dairy gas consumption aligns to

seasonal solar generation patterns

Our food processing electrification proposition is widely beneficial

Targeting 1+ TWh of electrified process heat demand by FY31

Decarbonisation of

industrial sector, shifting

off gas reliance

Grid impact limited by

matching demand with

renewable supply

New

Zealand

Low cost, economically

attractive, reliable new

renewable electricity

Supporting

decarbonisation of

operations

Our food

processing

customers

Contact

Retain winter and peak

merchant exposure to

capture GWAP

De-risk solar deployment

through high quality

offtake, enabling project

finance

Benefits

Illustrative shape

1

1. Demand and irradiance curves are not to scale. Dairy gas demand is based on actual Fonterra natural gas usage as published by the Gas Industry Co. Solar irradiance is illustrative based on average

New Zealand general irradiance data – Global Solar Atlas. | 2. Solar generation numbers provided represent 80% of expected generation from each respective project in line with Contact’s actual and

expected contracted offtake from JVs.

Dairy gas demandSolar irradiance

Jun

Jun

Jan

Jan

Jan

WinterWinter

68

540

1,070

19

Summer load

opportunity

220

224

240

144

Priority

Contact solar

Christchurch Airport & BP

Synlait

Fonterra (Whareroa)

Food processing opportunities

Summer load and output opportunity (GWh)

Party

Argyle

Stratford

Glorit

Kōwhai Park

Priority Contact solar

(output at 80%)

2

27
Attractive consented solar options are being

advanced through our JV with Lightsource bp

In

development

ConsentedUnder

construction

Total

pipeline

3.0

Status of key solar projects and development options

In development

In development - near consent outcome

Consented

Under construction

Kōwhai park

Stratford

Potential for

battery co-location

(100MW consented)

Status

Expected online

end Q2 CY26

Capacity

150MWac

FIDEnergisation

Start of

construction

Status

Earliest FID

FY27

Capacity

~150MWac

Consent

lodged

FID

preparation

Consent under

assessment

Solar generation pipeline, TWh

Located near industrial

load improving location

factor

Argyle

2

High-capacity

factor, existing

connection

Status

Earliest FID

FY26

Annual output

~180GWh

Consent

lodged

FID

preparation

Consent

obtained

Capacity

~80MWac

Glorit

Upper North Island

generation benefits

GWAP

Status

Earliest FID

FY26

Capacity

~150MWac

Consent

obtained

FID

preparation

Consent under

appeal

1

Annual output

~280GWh

Annual output

~275GWh

Annual output

~300GWh

Expecting

Stratford

consent

outcome in

FY26

1

1. Glorit Consent, initially granted in October 2025, is now under appeal. | 2. Argyle is a legacy Manawa solar development option and does not fall under the joint venture with Lightsource bp at this time.

2.02.0

0.6

0.2

0.3

0.6

0.2

0.3

28
Priorities over next 5 years

Target milestones and outcomes

FY27

FY31

Lead on new flexibility in New Zealand

1. Expected online end Q1 CY26. | 2. Each FID to be considered in isolation with all information available at the time. Pending appropriate

market conditions and projects meeting returns thresholds.

Lead and accelerate batterydevelopment to

firm renewables intraday

Become New Zealand’s leading digital trader,

extending our digital platforms and optimising

ourgrowing and diverse portfolio

Leverage our contracted gas,access to gas

storage and our peaking plant to support

continued security of energy supply

Realise the value from our expanded hydro

portfoliobuilding an advantage in hydro

flexibility

Evaluate a portfolio of long-term flex

development options(e.g. hydro) for FY31+

•Glenbrook-Ohurua

100MW battery delivered

1


•Additional 200MW battery under

construction

2

•Manawa portfolio benefits of

$10-20M p.a. delivered

•500MW of batteries online, a further

500MW consented

2

•Long-term renewable flex

options developed

•FY31+ peaking strategy developed

28

Contact31+ pillar:

29
Battery opportunity to reach 900-1,200MW by 2030, driven by

thermal displacement, renewable growth and rising peak demand

...leading to an expected battery market

opportunity of 900-1,200MW by 2030

Battery market opportunity (Contact’s disorderly

decarbonisation scenario), cumulative, MW

202520262030

135

700-900

900-1,200

LowHighActual

1. Stratford peakers, McKee, Whirinaki, Huntly Unit 6. | 2. TCC (energy, but not dispatchability, replaced by new baseload

geothermal).


| 3. Thermal generation dispatchability is not entirely replaced by battery.

6.0

6.5

7.0

7.5

2019202020212022202320242025

YTD

~900MW

thermal displacement

opportunity

3

~1.6GW

of new intermittent

wind and solar to be

deployed by 2030

~25-50

MW/year

peak demand increase

Battery market opportunity is driven by three main factors...

Fast start and winter

peak coverage

generation capacity,

MW

600

600

Fast start

generation

1

300

Announced

thermal (CCGT)

closure

2

300

Total

900

1.1

0.5

SolarWind

Wind and solar

capacity growth, in

Contact’s disorderly

decarbonisation

scenario, GW

Thermal generation displacement

Intermittent renewable growth forecast, cumulative GW, FY26-30

Rising peak demand

Current peak

demand, GW

Average of top 100 peaks

Top 100 peaks

Thermal plant is still needed to support winter energy demand, however, batteries can

shift energy to efficiently meet short-term peak dispatch requirements

Source: EMI, Transpower.

30
We are expecting our first battery online in Q1 CY26 and

accelerating options from our pipeline

Glenbrook-Ohurua battery updateContact

battery

pipeline

Wellington

Glenbrook-Ohurua battery

Under construction: 100MW

Glenbrook 200 battery

Development: Consent filed for

incremental 400MW

1

Stratford battery

Consented: 100MW

Development: Consent

filed for incremental

400MW

Prime locations,

near growing

customer base

and transmission

grid access

Approach for future deployment

Experience building

grid scale batteries

in New Zealand

giving us a repeatable

low-cost playbook

On track to be online by end Q1 CY26

Battery dispatch algorithm under development

In-house capability in

battery development

and proprietary

dispatch optimisation

model (BatMan)

•Leverage execution playbook from first battery for faster

execution, lower costs and higher value

•Option to continue with Tesla for consistency across operating

procedures and plant

•Interest growing from a variety of offtakers (e.g., gentailers, IPPs,

retailers) for battery-related risk management products

Competitive advantages

Portfolio is

complementary with

batteries, providing

firming benefits across

our portfolio and solar

pipeline

100MW in construction

100MW consented

800MW in consenting

Auckland

Large scale

pipeline, brings

procurement

benefits and other

efficiencies e.g., on

grid connection

1. A draft consent for 400MW incremental capacity at Glenbrook has been received from Auckland City Council.

31
Dry years expose New Zealand to a ~4TWh supply

gap from reduced hydro output

We will explore options to support cost effective

seasonal flexibility and security of supply

We are exploring long-term options to displace dry year

energy sources that carry a high cost of dispatch

Optimising utility of thermal fleet

and storage

800

1,200

300

1,000

300

335

Contingent

hydro

storage

Industry

HFOs

Ahuroa

Gas

Storage

(AGS)

Demand

response

Methanex

flex

Whirinaki

diesel

Dry year

swing

Current cross-market energy

sources to support dry years, GWh

The above options (ex-hydro) have a dispatch cost >$200/MWh

Developing and augmenting hydro,

including consenting additional flexibility

Optimising renewable generation with

targeted solar, wind and battery

development – freeing up hydro and

thermal fuel for when it’s most needed

1. Short Run Marginal Cost.

3,900 – 4,000

32
We will explore long-term options to support cost-

effective seasonal flexibility and security of supply

Brownfield hydro augmentation

Optimising utility of gas across thermal fleet and storage

Clyde refurbishment

Potential annual uplift:

30-50GWh

1

Roxburgh runners

upgrade (units 5 and 6)

Potential annual uplift:

~12GWh

1

Contact31+ strategy window:

•Optimise use of annual gas supply contracts of ~10PJ

4

, storage of

~3.5PJ at AGS and peaking fleet at Stratford

•Provides the transitional support for periods of low renewable (wind,

hydro) generation while further renewable options are developed

•Potential for AGS to be applied to market-developed LNG solutions

•FY31+ peaking strategy to be developed

Early concepts – Clutha hydro scheme

1. In mean hydro conditions. | 2. Potential annual uplift available from refurbishments across Manawa schemes, over and above the Manawa hydro refurbishment programme already announced and

underway. | 3. Option utilises existing Clutha scheme storage i.e. no change in storage. | 4. Contact retains some optionality on a portion of this gas. Contracted gas sales for the next 12 months total ~5PJ,

including the recently announced All-of-Government contract.

Clutha

Residual flow

Developing and augmenting hydro, examples for feasibility-testing within Contact31+ strategy window

Optimising renewable generation

Consenting additional flexibilityPumped hydro

Hawea

Operating range

Solar development

offsetting summer

hydro

Lakes able to

be held higher

into winter

New wind

deployed with

low geographic

correlation

Increases

wind

‘firmness’

Large scale

battery use

for short-term

dispatch

Gas retained

for periods of

low renewable

generation

Catchment

Capacity

MW

Storage

GWh

Flex /

storage

1~90Existing

3

Daily /

seasonal

275 – 200150-200

Development timelines: 7+ years post-feasibility

Manawa schemes

Potential annual uplift:

50-100GWh

1,2

33
Relationships

with our

stakeholders

Chris Abbott

Chief Corporate Affairs Officer

34
Contact31+ takes a focused approach

to our stakeholder relationships

Relationships

withour

stakeholders,

enabling

renewable energy

generation for all

of New Zealand

Tangata whenua,

iwi,hapū

Landowners

Local

communities

Environmental

stewards

(local councils, DOC

2

, etc.)

Customers

(household, SME

and industry)

Government

and regulators

Contact31+ is designed to deliver

energy for all of New Zealand,

engaging with a broad set of key

external stakeholders

Contact’s transparent and proactive

approach to stakeholders supports

collaboration with specific groups,

while providing renewable electricity

at a competitiveLRMC

1

1. Long Run Marginal Cost. | 2. Department of Conservation.

35
Long-term PPAs with customers, backed by Tauhara

Long-term supply deals to support decarbonisation

Renewable heat ROI currently in-market, seeking

interest in conversion of process heat

2

Demand response prioritised in new contracts e.g. NZAS

We continue to respond to gas and electricity

market challenges for our customers

Market challenges

Energy hardship for

household and industrial

customers has increased

Energy cost increases have

been exacerbated by gas

decline and higher energy

distribution costs

1

Price volatility has increased

with the increase in

intermittent renewable

generation

Ability for businesses and

critical users to contract gas

has been impacted by

declining availability

What we’re doing

Household customers

Supporting vulnerable

customers

Helping households

shift their load shape

Time of Use products (e.g., Good Plans)

Flex / virtual power plant (e.g., Hot Water Sorter)

Energy Wellbeing (e.g., The Good Initiative)

Removal of disconnection and reconnection fees

1. From 1 April 2025, Commerce Commission-approved changes to network charges began to take effect, increasing household bills by $10-$25 per month on average (depending on region

and usage profile). | 2. Contact is seeking interest from process heat customers who are looking to switch from natural gas to renewable electricity, given current gas supply constraints.

Industrial customers

Supporting New

Zealand’s industry to

transition

Businesses and core

service providers

Keeping businesses and

critical services operating

Gas of up to 10PJ p.a. secured, enabling support of

gas-reliant businesses and core service providers

All-of-Government gas supply deal to support

~100 government agencies and institutions (e.g.,

schools, hospitals)

36
We remain committed and are charting strong

progress to Net Zero generation by 2035

-100

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

FY25Additional

geothermal

generation

1

Hydro

normalisation

TCC closureBatteriesTe Mihi 2 & 3

re-injection

Potential

future

initiatives

Forestry

offset

Potential buffer for increased emissions due to dry conditions

Contact’s Net Zero (Scope 1&2) Carbon Waterfall, tCO

2

e Initiatives

Contact is developing new and

updated externally-validated near-

and long-term science-based targets

•We are preparing to close our

remaining baseload gas generation

plant, Taranaki Combined Cycle (TCC),

within the next 2-3 months

•Carbon reduction through

displacement of thermal peaker usage

by current and pipeline battery assets

•Reduction in geothermal emissions

from carbon reinjection at Te Mihi 2 & 3

2

•Geothermal capture and re-injection

across the fleet and long-term hydro

optimisation. All potential initiatives are

subject to feasibility and may extend

beyond Contact31+ window

A

B

C

D

ABC

Note: Assumes future geothermal builds include carbon capture and reinjection. Subject to feasibility at FID.

1. Additional geothermal generation emissions related to a full year of operations at Tauhara and Te Huka 3 i.e., incremental to emissions from these new stations in FY25. | 2. Te Mihi Stage 3 remains subject to FID.

D

SBTI 2026

37
We are reducing the environmental impact of

aspired growth

Principles-guided approach

Geothermal

•Tauhara 2

•Te Mihi Stage 3

Battery

•Glenbrook 200

•Stratford

Wind

•Southland

•Huriwaka

Solar

•Glorit

•Argyle

•Stratford

Nearer-term pipelineApplication across proposed development

Glorit

Solar

Te Mihi

Stages 2 & 3

Southland

Wind

Contact’s consenting

conditions support

surrounding biodiversity

2

Contact’s replacement

of Wairakei station will stop

geothermal discharge

into the Waikato River

Contact’s proposed

long-term protection of

the surrounding wetland

would deliver conservation

benefitsotherwise unavailable

(e.g., pest control,fencing)

Early assessments: Sustainability

assessments included at pre-site

development stage

Targeted local engagement:

Targeted initiatives with local

communities and tangata whenua

Managing impact: RMA

1

and consent

conditions to mitigate ecological impact

‘Win-win’ outcomes: Initiatives

with positive outcomes not possible

without asset development

Resilient solutions: Leveraging

nature-based solutions

1. Resource Management Act. | 2. Contact was granted consent for Glorit in October 2025. This consent is now under appeal.

38
Our development plans necessitate an effective consenting

approach, using both Fast Track and traditional pathways

Our consenting approach balances factors

relevant to each project to determine the best

and most effective strategy available, using

traditional consenting pathways alongside Fast

Track processes when most appropriate

We continue to utilise regularconsent

pathways for straightforward projects

(e.g., Glenbrook battery development) with

limited visual and ecological impact

Engaging

stakeholders

We adopt a purpose-led approach to the

Fast Track process, focusing on cases where

we can accelerate nationally critical projects

and increase efficiency across our pipeline

7

Targeted

approach to

consenting

projects currently in or

submitted for Fast Track

We adopt a purposeful approach to consenting, balancing what is right for New Zealand through a tailored approach

for each site and situation, and recognising the importance of pace to support New Zealand’s renewable energy transition

39
Q&A:

Dorian Devers

Chris Abbott

40
Manawa

integration

update

Jan Bibby

Chief People Experience Officer

Matt Bolton

Manawa Integration Director

John Clark

Chief Generation Officer

41
Leading the

energy

transition

at home

Carolyn Luey

Chief Retail Officer

42
Contact26: Results demonstrate strong performance

as the lowest cost-to-serve energy retailer

Multi-services provider

Trusted retail provider

Lowest cost-to-serve

energy retailer

150k multi-product customers (+61%)

8x gas and 3x telco EBITDAF growthFY22-25

34% of electricity base now on Time of Use plans

3 flex products in-market

1. The Good Initiative helps Contact partner with social agencies and heartland community groups to cover their energy costs, focusedon the Northland, Gisborne and central North Island areas. | 2. Cost-to-serve

measured here on a per connection basis in line with Contact26 strategy targets. Defined as: (Direct Retail opex + indirect opex – customer acquisition cost) / total connections at the end of June.

No contracts or disconnection fees

TheGood Initiative launched

1

to amplify

Energy Wellbeing programme

~80% of customer interactions

were digitalin FY25

Cost-to-serve per connection down 14%

2

96

83

83

81

83

FY23FY24FY25FY21FY22

-14%

93

114

125

139

150

FY21FY23FY24FY25FY22

+61%

35

37

40

37

40

FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25

Multi-product customers, 000’s

Contact Net Promoter Score

Cost-to-Serve per connection, $

43
Increasing regulatory

presence

Customers seeking

value and participation

Shifting tech-enabled

competitor landscape

Regulatory oversight of energy

affordability is increasing as cost-of-

living pressures continue

Growing compliance requirements

to improve ease of plan comparison

(e.g. bill standardisation)

Policymakers are taking an active

role in driving customer choice

(e.g., retailers must offer Time of Use

products from June 2026)

Energy retailers globally are

transforming their operating

models, leveraging AI

New Zealand energy retailers are

adopting new technologies at

pace, to improve customer

experience, cost-to-serve and

speed to market

Customers are actively seeking value

and changing energy consumption

behaviours in the face of rising energy

prices (including regulated lines

charges)

Expectations for convenient and

streamlined customer experience are

growing, driven by digitisation

Growing segment of customers

participating in the energy transition

with EVs, solar and batteries

Regulation, competition, and

customer preferences are shifting

44
Priorities over next 5 years

Target milestones and outcomes

FY27

FY31

Lead the energy transition at home

1. Cost-to-serve per customer. Calculated as total retail opex, excluding acquisition costs and indirect technology costs not directly related to customer service,

divided by total number of customers. This differs from $/connection historically reported. Cost-to-serve in FY25 was $113/customer and $83/connection.

Future technology stack selected

and execution commenced

Cost-to-serve $110 per customer

1

15 – 20MW retail demand flex

under management

All customers live on new platform

Cost-to-serve $90 per customer

1

65MW retail demand flex under

management

Attract and reward key customer energy

profiles,locations and product bundles to

optimise lifetime value

Harness digital and AI technology to make

every interaction easy and personal, while

reducing cost-to-serve

Empower customers to shift usage to off-

peak through demand flex, VPPs and

Contact's Good Plans

44

Contact31+ pillar:

45
We will expand on our cost-to-serve advantage

through a modernised retail technology platform

Tools to achieve reduction in cost-to-serve per

customer will target operational efficiency

Reduction in cost-to-serve per customer through

specific levers

1


103

104

105

Current total

cost-to-serve

per customer

Target future

cost-to-serve

per customer

~$113

~$90

~20%

Use AI to

automate and

digitise

customer service

Develop

people

capabilities

Simplify

product

suite

Modernise

Contact’s

retail tech

platform

1. Calculated as total retail opex, excluding acquisition costs and indirect technology costs not directly related to customer service, divided by total number of customers. Cost-to-serve measured

per customer indicates a shift in measurement approach vs Contact26. Assessing cost per customer aligns with our customer-centric approach, considering each customer’s relationship with

Contact, and facilitates comparison with global benchmarks. Cost-to-serve in FY25 was $113/customer and $83/connection.

Retail platform modernisation & cost-to-serve

delivery approach

Continuous delivery

based on experience,

ensuring margins and

customer satisfaction

are maintained

FY27FY27 - 30FY30+

Indicative timings

Iterative approach

to implementation,

minimising business

and customer disruption

Right size ambition

by advancing Initial

Business Casing and

competitive tender

46
Contact can leverage existing Time of

Use products to help customers

manage energy usage, while reducing

pressure on the grid

Our strategy includes enhancing our

current products (e.g., expanding to

dynamic Hot Water Sorter), while

piloting new retail flex products

Overall retail flex

opportunity in

New Zealand was

~500-600MW

in FY25

Hot Water Sorter reached

>20k homes in FY25,

shifting 4GWh of residential

demand off-peak

Total marketIncreased TAM for growing digital load Total market

Retail demand flex provides shared value, supporting customer

ownership over energy use and improving Contact’s load shape

Hot Water Sorter

is a key example

of value creation

for customers

Illustrative retail flex capacity across total addressable New

Zealand market FY25, MW

We will continue

to unlock value

through broader

retail flex products

We will continue piloting our EV

trial with Kinergy (began June

2025), using AI to automatically

charge EVs during low-demand

Hot water sorterEVBatteryTotal market

500 - 600

Sources: ECCA, New Zealand Transport agency, EMI.

Current dynamic load

control trials can increase

value for customers and

Contact, leaning into a

growing market

47
Our comprehensive energy, mobile and broadband offerings meet

expanding customer needs, with gas supporting customers transitioning

their energy footprint

We are leaning into customers’ increasing ownership of their energy

usage, offering flex products and Time of Use plans that allow customers to

shift their load and save (and supporting the grid)

Our energy wellbeing initiatives support vulnerable customers, through

The Good Initiative, with partnerships with community groups and

wellbeing credits

Enhanced customer

experience

Our retail business is focussed on supporting all

New Zealanders through the energy transition

Great customer choice

Multi-product offering

Energy wellbeing

We are expanding our digital and AI capabilities to deliver a more

personal customer experience, reduce the number of interactions and

time to resolve

48
Tech

advantage

Tighe Wall

Chief Technology Officer

John Clark

Chief Generation Officer

49
Contact26 laid the groundwork for a leading,

digitally-enabled Contact Energy

Contact26

achievements

•Launched plant

optimisation tools

including geothermal well

health solution

•Piloting AI agents for HSE

and Process Safety

Generation

•Upgraded trading

optimisation capabilities

(e.g., algorithmic trading)

•Implemented modernised

ETRM (Energy Trading and

Risk Management) system

Trading and flex

•Developed early

strategic partnerships

with leading providers

•Built strong

foundations and

security practices

Data and

enterprise tech

•Delivered process, data

and automation

improvements

•Enabling value-add

procurement practices

CorporateRetail

•Developed New Zealand-

leading customer data

capability

•Drove migration to self-

service enabling market-

leading cost-to-Serve

50
Technology will now accelerate while

simplifying the tech stack

Leading in advanced

analytics and AI

Establish a distinctive competitive

advantage in advanced analytics to

drive enterprise productivity

Lean, flexible and

efficient technology

Further streamline the technology

landscape enabling faster, more cost-

effective and scalable operations

Stable and secure

systems

Maintain a simple and reliable

enterprise system, safeguarding the

business with best practice cybersecurity

Key activities

Accelerate the delivery of data

analytics and AI agents to surface

insights and automate workflows and

processes

Continuous improvement in data and

AI capabilities

Key activities

Simplify enterprise architecture and

technology stack, including trading

and retail platforms

Unify the technology operating model

Key activities

Enhance cybersecurity and

compliance for IT and OT

1

assets​

Develop best practice technology

foundations

Continuous improvement in

operational performance

1. Operational Technology.

Contact31+ builds on this progress
Generation

Drive plant efficiency

and boost productivity

through digitisation

and automation (e.g.,

predictive analytics)

Trading and flex

Establish lead in trading:

Real-time spottrading,

portfolio modelling and

derivatives trading

(including AI and ML

1

)

Data and

enterprise tech

Simplify enterprise

architecture and

technology stack

Corporate

Deliver productivity-

enhancing tools, process

re-engineering and

intelligent automation

Retail

Modernise the retail

platform including

enabling advanced

customer segmentation

and call centre efficiency

Indicative

timings of

initiatives

Underpinning our technology leadership aspirations is the need to deliver on a

smooth and secure technology transition for Manawa employees and plants

FY

27

Asset management optimisation

programme

Develop best practice technology

foundations (TAM

2

, architecture, etc.)

Continue to identify and deliver AI use

cases

FY

27-30

Productivity uplift

through iterative scaling

of data and AI use cases

Enhance real time trading

and portfolio analytics

FY

30+

Tools iterated to remain

up to date, secure and

responsive to market

changes

Continuous improvement

in capabilities and

delivering business value

Deliver retail re-platforming iteratively

51

1. Machine Learning. | 2. Technology Asset Management.

52
{

0

500

1,000

1,500

HOWARD suggests changes to dispatch profile (reduce / increase water dispatched)

based on forward price forecast. In this illustration, a more shaped hydro dispatch

profile would be more optimal than the current flat profile to match the price volatility

Source: Illustrative HOWARD tool output applied to Contact’s Clutha hydro scheme.

GeothermalHydro (pre-optimisation)Hydro (reduce)Hydro (increase)TCCPeakers

Generation,

MW

23-7-2022 AM23-7-2022 PM24-7-2022 AM24-7-2022 PM

Price

forecast,

$/MWh

Advanced hydro optimisation

tool, improving price exposure

through optimal intraday

dispatch

Expected to yield an

average 1 – 2% asset revenue

improvement once fully

implemented

Following strong results in real

time testing conditions we are

moving to embed HOWARD

with completion targeted for

2H FY26

Case study: Digitally enabled and real-time hydro dispatch

(HOWARD)

We will expand HOWARD’s

capabilities and application,

adding smart forecasting of

demand, intermittent

renewables, and prices as well

as applying the same principles

across other flexible assets

0

100

200

300

400

500

53
{

Source: Illustrative BatMan outputs.

Works to co-optimise

battery dispatch across

energy and ancillary

services and automate

market bids and offers

Targeting Percentage of

Perfect (PoP) metrics

aligned with OEM

algorithms

PoP is a measure of

algorithm performance

against perfect foresight

operations

Contact developed BatMan

in-house, strengthening our

internal capabilities, as no

Battery OEMs offered

autobidder solutions in New

Zealand

Case study: Battery Manager (BatMan)

$0

$50

$100

$150

$200

$250

$300

$350

-100

-50

0

50

100

Price ($/MWh)

ChargeDischargeSpot price

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

Generation,

MW

&

Price

forecast,

$/MWh

Battery

state of

charge, %

BatMan will identify the optimal charge and discharge of the battery based on prices

and co-optimisation with reserve markets. It also uses advanced techniques to

determine the ‘value of storage’ to form a bid/offer strategy into the market.

Gate closure

54
Q&A:

Carolyn Luey

Tighe Wall

John Clark

55
Financial

framework

for growth

Matt Forbes

Chief Financial Officer

56
Geothermal

leadership

Baseload renewable

generation, with capacity

factors ~95%

1

and low

marginal cost

Manawa

integration benefits

Integration brings wind

development capability and

distributed generation reach,

supported by Contact’s proven

delivery track record


Portfolio diversity

Contact combines

geothermal, hydro and

flexible thermal for risk

management and price

optimisation

We are strategically differentiated from our peers – leading

the transition, not following it

Customer

offerings and digital

leadership

National footprint with a

range of products, lowest

cost-to-serve and

leadership in demand

flexibility for customers

Energy

transition enabler

Deep relationships

with industrial

customers to electrify

process heat – critical

for decarbonisation

Capital discipline and

partnership model

Clear opex / capex targets

and structural cost-down

programmes, contrasting

with peers’ higher exposure

to hydro variability and

consent delays

1. Estimated average capacity factors for new stations.

57
Relative valuation

Attractive EV/EBITDAF

vs peers despite

superior growth

pipeline and

execution track record

Sustainable finance

leadership

Green bonds and

strong sustainability

ratings

Predictable cash

flows

Geothermal baseload

reduces volatility vs

hydro-heavy peers

Dividend strength

+ growth

Consistent payout

with upside from new

projects

Capital structure

strength

Investment-grade

rating and leverage

discipline

Risk mitigation

Balanced portfolio and

hedging strategy vs hydro

variability

Investment in Contact offers clear value for investors

58
Financial

performance

and context

59
We have outperformed indicative project returns and market

earnings expectations under Contact26

Sustained earnings uplift

$500M uplift in normalised and expected EBITDAF

Contact26 market expectation

FY25 consensus EBITDAF

expectations as at May 2021

1

$588M

480

520

550

600

770

553

546

573

663

774

FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25

Guidance vs Actual EBITDAF, $M

945

FY26e

980

Guidance at start of the year (normalised hydrology)Integration and transaction costs

Normalised and

expected EBITDAF

Attractive returns from growth investment

Total growth capex FY21-FY25: >$1.6 billion

Project IRRs on new plants (expected)

Tauhara

$931M invested

Te Huka 3

$305M invested

At final investment

decision

Post

construction

2

~13%

~14%

~10%

~10%

2%

Competitor 1

8%

Competitor 2

10%

Competitor 3

13%

Contact

Total shareholder return (FY21 – 25), % p.a.

3

1. Bloomberg consensus EBITDAF expectations for FY25 as at 31 May 2021. | 2. Expected IRR over the life of the plant updated for actual construction costs, electricity price assumptions and output.

All IRRs on this slide are unlevered project returns. | 3. Annual equivalent returns shown on a gross basis and assuming dividends are reinvested at market price. Source Bloomberg.

Actual result (underlying)

Compelling total shareholder return

60
3.1

4.5

FY21FY25

Geothermal output, TWh

1.3

1.7

FY21FY25

1.6

1.1

FY21FY25

Thermal generation, TWh

$200/MWh

118

158

FY21FY25

Price, $/MWh

9.4

9.0

TWh:

Fuel cost:

2626

FY21FY25

Opex / gross margin, %

EBITDAF outperformance under Contact26 resulted from

delivering on short- and long-term value drivers

Industrial customer PPAs (long-term contracts) signed.

Tauhara-backed PPAs to major energy users (Oji Fibre,

PanPac) and thermal substitution (Genesis) – supporting

supply and demand balance

Renewable output from the new Tauhara and Te Huka 3

geothermal plants was 1.5TWh in FY25, contributing

$120M to EBITDAF

Thermal-backed risk management supported stability of

earnings during dry periods. Contact FY25 performance was

101% of initial guidance (and consensus) vs peers ~80%

1

Reduced thermal generation from 1.6TWh to 1.1TWh,

avoiding thermal costs of ~$100M

Pricing increased from $118/MWh to $158/MWh reflecting

channel mix changes and repricing to market, partially

offset by higher thermal costs ($101/MWh to $200/MWh)

Operational efficiencies (opex / gross margin) of

26% flat from FY21 to FY25, maintaining opex

efficiency during period of growth

1

2

1

2

3

Short-term

value

drivers

Fuel mix

and risk

management

Pricing

and

channels

Operational

and capital

efficiency

Long-term

value

drivers

Invest in

renewable

supply

Decarb.

growth

opportunities

2

1

1

2

3

Strategic fixed-price sales, TWh

1. Average of FY25 EBITDAF result over consensus (at start of FY25) across Contact’s three closest competitors.

60

61
Notes: Assumes repricing at 2027-2029 ASX futures, 50% BEN, 50% OTA as at 3

rd

November ($160/MWh). | Long run hydro post enhancement programme completions. | Fully ramped cost synergies. |

Enterprise value of $2,559M as per Manawa Energy Scheme booklet.

154

250

218

42

26

28

FY26e Manawa

standalone

1

Sales channel repricing

2

Generation normalisation

and enhancements

2

Cost synergies (100%)

Average contribution

from Manawa (at ASX)

Normalised at $120/MWh

+96

Transaction

EV/EBITDAF

We expect a $96M increase on Manawa’s standalone FY26

EBITDAF contribution when contracts reprice to market

Net uplift from contract repricing, $/MWh

Applying current ASX futures for 2027 - 2029

Cost synergies, on track to meet top end of opex reduction range

138

160

FY26e

1

At current ASX

Contracted

+22

Now

$28M

100% within 12-18 months

of completion

At announcement

$23-28M

100% within 18-24 months

of completion

At completion

$25-28M

100% within 12-18 months

of completion

Generation normalisation and enhancements, GWh p.a.

10.2x

Manawa EBITDAF contribution, $M

Combination of the businesses reduces risk, resulting in a lower combined WACC

1,850

1,990

FY26e

1

115

Outages

3

25

Enhancements

4

Normalised

output

1. Standalone contribution from Manawa within Contact’s FY26 normalised and expected EBITDAF as indicated in August 2025. | 2. Portfolio benefits of $10-20M p.a. are captured within sales channel

repricing and generation enhancements. | 3. Highbank and Coleridge unit G1 are on outage for the completion of announced asset enhancements. | 4. Represents remaining uplift in annual output to

be delivered in FY27 and FY28 from completion of the announced asset enhancement programme.

62
Capital

allocation

framework

63
Contact31+ capital allocation framework – resilient and accretive

Capital allocation priorities

Growth investment commitments

Investor metrics

Resilient through the cycle: How we manage risk and protect growth

Preserve financial

strength

Fund core

operations

Invest for growth

and transition

Deliver dividends

from cash flows

Maintain BBB credit rating; net

debt/EBITDAF target 2.6–2.8x

(upper limit 3.0x)

BAU sustaining

capex $110–120M p.a.

(2025 real)

Allocate to projects exceeding

target returns; prioritise

renewables and flexibility +

$140M timebound

enhancements (see page 78)

Payout 80–100% rolling four-year

OFCF

1

; consider buybacks when

leverage sustainably below target and

if further dividends are unimputed

Issue hybrids

Moderate payout within

80–100% dividend policy

1

Further steps to

protect BBB rating

Phase discretionary growth

+300bps uplift

by FY31

Maintain

55% - 60% of

EBITDAF

Operating Free

Cash Flow

ROIC

trajectory

Hurdle

rates

Project

returns >10%

(or WACC + 200–

300bps+)

Investments to exceed

target return thresholds

and respond to market

signals (including demand

for PPAs and strong

business performance)

Maintain

investment discipline

and flexibility

Prioritise

balance sheet

Strategic assets held

on-balance sheet to

preserve control

Non-core assets

financed off-balance

sheet to share risk and

improve returns

1. Contact’s dividend policy is to pay dividends of 80-100% of average Operating Free Cash Flow of the preceding four years. As the historic measure will not capture the operating free cash flow contribution from

Manawa within the history, the Board will apply discretion in the first few years post-acquisition, if the measure is temporarily above 100%, so that it is not constrained in delivering the expected DPS uplift.

64
We will prioritise the balance sheet, maintaining funding

flexibility and investing in projects that exceed target returns

Value of control (illustrative)

High

Low

LowHigh

Contact return

(illustrative)

Illustrative expected return vs value of control, by asset type

Held on-balance sheet to

preserve strategic control

Strategic assets held on-balance sheet

Non-core assets financed

off-balance sheet to share risk

Improve returns

Maximum 50% ownership

S&P

guardrails

Asset

class

Target

project

IRR

2

, %

Financing

strategy

Solar9%+

SPV/JV (50%)

Off-balance sheet

Wind

9%+

SPV/JV (50%)

Off-balance sheet

Geothermal

10-12%

On-balance sheet

Brownfield

development

(incl. hydro)

1

WACC+

On-balance sheet

Batteries

10%+

On-balance sheet

12%+

12%+

10-12%

WACC+

10%+

Target

return to

Contact

3

, %

Separate operations

and management

Project debt non-

recourse to Contact

Non-core part of business –

less than ~10% of EBITDAF

Solar and wind:

Financed off-balance

sheet to reduce capital

outlay improving

returns where control

adds limited value

Geothermal

and hydro:

Core strategic

asset classes

where control

delivers long-

term value

Battery: Integral to

portfolio optimisation and

value-driven dispatch

1. Across all asset classes. | 2. IRR represents targeted unlevered project returns. | 3. IRR represents the targeted returns from the project to Contact. For

off-balance sheet investments this includes an equity IRR for Contact’s share of JV profits and the value of the sale of Contact’s share of project offtake.

65
Diversified approach to funding underpins

efficient access to capital and strong liquidity

•Institutional retail split remains largely consistent over time at ~55% / 45%

•Geographic split remains similar to 2021 but with greater exposure to US

institutional investors after continued engagement by the executive team:

•US (targeted regional fund engagement),

•London,

•Hong Kong, Singapore, Tokyo (Semi-annual roadshows),

•Australia (Semi-annual roadshows, conferences)

Deep diversification

Inaugural EUR MTN

note issued

November 2025

(€500M / $1B NZD)

to replace Manawa

acquisition finance

Contact now targets

4 international debt

markets to ensure

stable and lowest

cost access to capital

Sources of funding, $M

Funding Dashboard

•Cost of debt (weighted average maturity)

5.8% (7.7 yrs) in FY25

•Fixed / floating mix

75% / 25% (12-month forward)

Benchmarked at ~60% fixed

•Liquidity runway

4

$1,089M (undrawn bank facilities $760M + cash $329M)

•Rating headroom

Current pro forma net debt / EBITDAF 2.7x

3

Estimated 30 Jun 2026 net debt / EBITDAF 2.9x vs upper limit 3.0x

100% of debt certified green under our sustainable finance programme

Maturities managed with

limits on <25% maturing

within a 12-month period

224

USPP

869

AUD MTN

1,012

EUR MTN

18

NEXI

2

550

NZD retail bonds

475

Capital bonds

(hybrids)

850

Bank facilities

6%

22%

25%

47%

USAAustraliaEuropeJapanNZ

$3,998M

1

Sources of balance sheet capacity to fund growth

Strong, diversified balance sheet

1. Facilities as at November 2025. | 2. NEXI: Export credit loan facility. | 3. As at 31 October 2025. | 4. Reflects pro forma net debt in September 2025 and FY26 normalised and expected EBITDAF.

Grow EBITDAF for

higher debt market

capacity

Operating Free

Cash Flow in excess of

committed dividends

Hybrids for

equity credit

Additional equity – DRP

66
Looking

forward

67
Our sales channels will adjust as Mercury and NZAS volumes step

down and prices revert to short- and long-run expectations

Channels to market, TWh

3.8

4.0

1.8

1.7

FY26 normalised

and expected

11.2

Retail

CFDs

C&I

Strategic

fixed price

Pricing linkage

Channel net

price, FY26e

Contact31+ expectations by channel

VolumeNet price

$155/

MWh

Reversion to long-run

wholesale price

expectations. Volume mix

adjusts based on load

and fuel positions.

$165/

MWh

Based on long-run

wholesale price

expectations (when

contracted),

adjusted for shape

and load. Inflation-

index linked

$95/

MWh

Offsetting impacts from

the step down in MCY

and NZAS volumes as

Fonterra and NZSteel

volumes commence.

Closely linked

to ASX futures

(short-term)

Closely linked to ASX

futures (short-term)

Long-run view of wholesale price

$115-125/MWh

2

2025 real terms

Base price at Otahuhu

Contracting accounts for many factors

including load shape and location

Note: All FY26e net price and volume assumptions are referenced to Contact’s normalised and expected EBITDAF view for FY26 as shown on slide 29 of the FY25 results presentation.

1. ASX prices as at 3 November 2025. | 2. This is a through-the-cycle measure in a balanced market. Prices achieved are a function of the market at a point in time. | 3. Net price excludes

retail operating cost-to-serve.

Reversion to long-run

wholesale price

expectations. Volume mix

adjusts based on load

and fuel positions.

Long-term channel

generally tracking to

inflation over time.

Limited linkage to

short-term futures

$164/

MWh

3

Energy price increases

linked to inflation.

Volumes steady, with

potential uplift linked to

retail gas penetration.

ASX linked

ASX futures prices,

Otahuhu, FY27 to FY30

1

68

237

225

138

175

218

210

119

163

206

201

117

157

196

192

114

Jan-26Jan-27Jan-28Jan-29Jan-30

178

OTA quarterly

68
Contact31+ productivity strategy extends on the Manawa

synergies, providing efficiency in the underlying cost base

FY26 – FY27 total opex pathway, $M

Target operating expense

Reduce underlying opex cost base by

$38M (run-rate savings) by FY27, through:

•$28M of Manawa cost synergies

•$10M in further productivity

improvements

FY31 underlying opex reduction target

being refined, to be disclosed post FY27

1. Accounts for expected inflation and opex associated with growth investment.

Our productivity pathway

383

373

348

363

-50

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

Productivity

improvement

11

FY27e

12

3

Inflation and

growth

1

FY27e

35

13

FY26e

(indicated

August

2025)

10

Reclassification

to fixed costs

35

13

FY26e

15

Manawa

synergies

(in-year)

10

405

395

359

15

374

11

•Leverage technology and AI

solutions to streamline work

•Enhance process efficiency

•Maintain commercial and capital

discipline as business scales

•Transform retail operating model,

continuing to lead in cost-to-serve

Underlying opex

Manawa transaction and

integration costs (one-off)

Inflation

New plant - battery

Manawa cost synergies

Contact31+ productivity drivers:

69
Target FY31+ fully ramped exit EBITDAF, $M

1

,

Subject to future investment decisions

Targeting $1.3-1.4B FY31+ fully ramped exit EBITDAF from

investment in renewable energy, retail and trading

Note: FY31+ fully ramped exit EBITDAF refers to the exit run-rate EBITDAF (full-year benefits) once all Contact31+ planned / targeted investments are completed and any later-phased plants are online.

1. EBITDAF targets assume mean hydro and wind generation. | 2. FY26 EBITDAF is underlying i.e. excluding one-off transaction and integration costs and is on a normalised and expected basis (mean

hydrology and wind conditions). | 3. JV assumptions include offtake to Contact at ~80% of generation. EBITDAF includes share of profits from JV. | 4. Assumes ~$20M in-year cost synergies and portfolio

benefits in FY26, being the mid-point of the range indicated in August 2025. | 5. FY31 range includes further upside of $0-50M EBITDAF from phase 2 productivity initiatives, retail and trading.

Net debt /

EBITDAF

~2.9x

2.6x - 2.8x

~1,300 – 1,400

FY26

(underlying)

2

Kōwhai

Park

3

Glenbrook-

Ohurua

battery

Te Mihi stage

2 (uplift)

Manawa

benefits

Phase 1

productivity

GeothermalSolar

3

Wind

3

BESSRetail

1,200 – 1,300

FY31+ fully

ramped exit

EBITDAF

5

980

8 - 10

10 - 15

20 - 25

15 - 20

45 - 75

~75

70 - 80

60 - 80

20 - 25

Committed growth projects

Growth projects subject to FID

Glenbrook 200

Stratford

Glorit

Argyle

Stratford

Southland

Huriwaka

Te Mihi Stage 3

uplift

Tauhara 2

Total $15-20M,

including FY26

initial contribution

Total $96M,

including FY26 initial

contribution

4

15.2TWh

11.8TWh

Generation

FY31 in-year

EBITDAF

10

70
Contact31+ growth investment is

supported by a range of funding levers

•Institutional retail split remains largely consistent over time at ~55% / 45%

•Geographic split remains similar to 2021 but with greater exposure to US

institutional investors after continued engagement by the executive team:

•US (targeted regional fund engagement),

•London,

•Hong Kong, Singapore, Tokyo (Semi-annual roadshows),

•Australia (Semi-annual roadshows, conferences)

Sources of balance sheet capacity to fund growth

Grow EBITDAF for

higher debt market

capacity

Operating Free

Cash Flow in excess of

committed dividends

Hybrids for

equity credit

Additional equity – DRP

Revenue CAGR 5-10%

EBITDAF margin 24-26%

Operating free cash flow

conversion 55-60%

80-100% is paid out as dividends

Up to $600M ($300M

equity credit) available

for new hybrids

~35% DRP take-up

Targets and assumptions

Committed

Potential

FY26 FIDs

All other projects

subject to FID

Growth

investment

FY27 to FY31,

Contact’s

contribution

Debt supported

by increased EBITDAF

$750-850M

DRP

$750-850M

Balance from OFCF

$600-700M

Funding

sources

1


FY27 to

FY31

Growth

capex

Investment in

associates

(ie. wind, solar)

~$2,250M

~$2,250M

~$2,250M

1. Illustrates funding sources for growth investment only.

71
Q&A:

Matt Forbes

Mike Fuge

72
Closing

comments

Mike Fuge

Chief Executive Officer

73
We’ve laid the groundwork and have a

clear vision for success through Contact31+

The market and our strong competitive position present an

opportunity to build on our Contact26 achievements

Contact31+ will see Contact lead New Zealand’s renewable energy

future, extending our geothermal advantage, leading in new

flexibility and building into new demand with wind and solar

We will continue to lead the energy transition at home,

empowering our customers to shift energy use while making

every interaction easy and personal

Delivering on our strategy will be enabled by empowered

people and leaders, stakeholder relationships, our tech

advantage and productivity

73

74
Contact31+ will deliver the highest value

outcomes for our investors and for NZ

•500MW of batteries online

1

, with a further 500MW consented

•Long-term renewable flex options developed

•FY31+ peaking strategy developed

Flex

...

•500+ MW wind delivered or committed

1

•450 MWac solar delivered

1

•1+ TWh industrial energy demand electrified

Wind and solar

•All customers live on modern retail platform

•Cost-to-serve $90 per customer

2

•65MW retail demand flex under management

Home

•ROIC +300bps on historical

•$1.2-1.3B EBITDAF (fully-ramped exit run-rate $1.3-1.4B)

•Dividend >50cps

Financial

•Tauhara 2 delivered

1

•Te Mihi Stage 3 on track (for delivery FY32)

1

•FID on Tauhara 3

1

•50MW+ greenfield options

Geothermal

FY31 Target

Subject to future investment decisions

Strategic pillar

1. Each FID to be considered in isolation with all information available at the time. Pending appropriate market conditions and projects meeting returns

thresholds. | 2. Cost-to-serve per customer. Calculated as total retail opex, excluding acquisition costs and indirect technology costs not directly related to

customer service, divided by total number of customers. This differs from $/connection previously measured under Contact26.

74

75
We are focused on delivering on our

commitments over the next 18 months

Te Mihi Stage 2

geothermal

on track

(for delivery FY28)

Glenbrook-

Ohurua

battery

online

Kōwhai

Park solar

delivered

1+ wind

farm

consented

Deliver

committed

renewable

energy

outcomes

Deliver

committed

financial

outcomes

Performance pre-requisites to unlock full growth potential

1

Benefits of

productivity

programme clear

Manawa

benefits

delivered

41-42cps

dividend in

FY27

2

1. All future investment decisions will be considered by the Board in isolation with all information available at the time. Pending appropriate

market conditions and projects meeting returns thresholds. | 2. All future dividend decisions are at the discretion of the Board at the time.

75

76
Thank you

77
Appendix

78
Contact’s efficient maintenance capex programme will include

targeted timebound enhancements to enable Contact31+

$140M

Timebound

enhancements,

FY27 to FY31

Hydro refurbishment

Wairakei extension

Tauhara spare rotor

Contact31+ enablement

BAU maintenance capex, FY27+

$110-

120M

Annual BAU

maintenance

capex (2025 real)

Potential annual

well drilling

(fuelling) cost

Geothermal fuelling (unconfirmed), FY27+

$2-3 /

MWh

(up to)

Note: See p42 of Contact’s FY25 results presentation for a breakdown of expected FY26 SIB capex.

12

1010

FY27FY28FY29FY30FY31

65-70

40-45

Indicative phasing, $M

Contact31+ enablement:

•Digital trading

•Modern retail platform

•Productivity

Wairakei & TCC decommissioning

Data sourced from publicly available filings. Our datasets may not be complete. Automated analysis can produce errors. If you believe any data on this page is incorrect, please contact us at hello@nzxplorer.co.nz. For informational purposes only. Not investment advice.

Other issuers discussed similar conditions around this time

Matched by meaning across NZX announcement text, not keywords — based on our semantic index of announcement bodies.

  • MEL — Meridian Energy Limited: Meridian Investor Day Presentation
    2025-11-19

    Release Meridian Energy Limited (ARBN 151 800 396) A company incorporated in New Zealand Level 2, 98 Customhouse Quay, Wellington 6011 meridianenergy.co.nz Stock Exchange Listings NZX (MEL) ASX (MEZ) Meridian Investor Day Presentation 20 November 2025 Att…”