Infratil Limited/Announcement
Infratil Limited logo

Infratil Full Year Results for the year ended 31 March 2026

Full Year Results25 May 2026IFTUtilities

Infratil Limited 5 Market Lane, PO Box 320, Wellington, New Zealand Tel +64-4-473 3663 www.infratil.com

26 May 2026


Infratil delivers 11% earnings lift and confirms strong growth outlook

• Proportionate operational EBITDAF[1] up 11% to NZ$989 million (FY25: NZ$895 million)

• Proportionate capital expenditure up 17% to NZ$2.7 billion (FY25: NZ$2.3 million)

• Total asset value up 13% to NZ$20.6 billion (FY25: NZ$18.3 billion)

• Over NZ$600 million of assets divested to focus on larger-scale growth opportunities

• Net parent surplus of NZ$550 million (FY25: loss of NZ$295 million)

• Final dividend of 13.65cps unimputed; total FY26 dividend of 20.9cps

• Guidance for FY27 Proportionate operational EBITDAF (excluding corporate costs) to

increase 21% at the mid-point vs FY26 $1,114 million, on a like-for-like basis


Infratil (NZX/ASX:IFT) today announced an 11% uplift in earnings to NZ$989 million for FY26, primarily

driven by investments in Australasian data centre business CDC and United States renewable energy

business Longroad Energy. It has also announced a strong growth outlook as both these businesses

convert investment supported by unprecedented sector demand, into a strong trajectory of future

revenue growth.

Infratil Chief Executive Jason Boyes said the infrastructure investor was very pleased to deliver a 13.9%

total shareholder return across FY26, despite ongoing market noise and volatility.

“Demand for efficient AI infrastructure is striking and may be the investment opportunity of a lifetime,”

Mr Boyes said.

“CDC’s announcement in early May of Australasia’s largest ever data centre contract has swept aside

the market ups and downs of FY26, adding approximately 35% of returns since 31 March. CDC has

demonstrated Australasia’s opportunity to attract global computing capacity, supported by regional

stability, competitive build costs and access to renewable energy,” he said.

CDC is now a global scale data centre operator with over one gigawatt of capacity contracted and is

forecasting its EBITDAF will grow more than 150% to over A$1 billion in FY28.

Longroad Energy is also benefitting from the AI thematic, with a project to supply a Meta data centre

and with further opportunities emerging.

Longroad Energy’s EBITDAF increased 170% to US$121 million in FY26 and is forecast to grow

strongly as more generation enters operation. It has lifted its solar and battery projects under

construction to a record 2GW in FY26 which combined with the 3.5GW already in operation, will deliver

total generation capacity equivalent to about half of New Zealand’s current capacity.

With electricity demand in the USA projected to increase by about 30% to 50% by 2040, Infratil has

agreed to provide a further US$300 million to support Longroad’s acceleration over the next two years.

The business is targeting US$1 billion run-rate EBITDAF by CY29/30, based on lifting its development

cadence to ~2GW annually. This is underpinned by the recent acquisition of a very large scale ~2.8GW

solar and battery development project, which is subject to regulatory approvals.




Infratil Limited 5 Market Lane, PO Box 320, Wellington, New Zealand Tel +64-4-473 3663 www.infratil.com

Data centres and renewable energy remain growth focus

Infratil is continually scanning for potential new opportunities to create shareholder value. Mr Boyes

says the strongest of these continue to be in data centres and renewable energy.

“We’re exploring more opportunities to bring power and data centre expertise together — delivering

integrated solutions for customers in a way that is more efficient and at greater scale. Longroad, for

example, has established a dedicated data centre team and is progressing options to develop more

than 4GW of grid-connected data centres, co-located with its solar and battery storage projects.

These options could include simply providing the sites as powered land, or with powered shells

developed by Longroad or with other partners.”

In the United Kingdom, Kao Data is also seeing increased data centre demand and secured a 10-

year agreement with an international neocloud provider for a 22MW deployment. In March, it acquired

a greenfield site at Park Royal in West London which will help accommodate further growth.

Decarbonisation and data centre electricity demand are both drivers for Infratil’s Asian renewable

energy business, Gurīn Energy. In March, its project to deliver solar energy from Indonesia to

Singapore received an Indonesian permit to generate, distribute and sell electricity. However, bilateral

government discussions to enable cross-border renewable energy trade and investment are taking

longer than hoped.

Other sectors largely resilient

Infratil’s telecommunications business, One NZ, increased its free cash flow and its distributions to

Infratil more than doubled, to NZ$180 million in the year. This was a credible performance given the

soft economic conditions in New Zealand and extent of market competition. Total connections on its

mobile network increased to almost 2 million and EonFibre is gaining traction as a wholesale high-

capacity bandwidth provider, having recently secured a material subsea capacity contract with a

hyperscaler.

Wellington Airport also remained resilient, delivering a 2% increase in EBITDAF despite weak

macroeconomic conditions and ongoing domestic airline fleet availability issues reducing total

passenger numbers. Significant investment during the year included a runway safety upgrade to

enable modern widebody aircraft to connect Wellington directly to hubs in Asia.

Australian medical imaging provider Qscan achieved 12% EBITDAF growth despite sector-wide

inflationary pressures. In New Zealand, RHCNZ also completed more scans, but EBITDAF reduced

slightly due to heightened costs and competition.

In Europe, renewable energy business Galileo has seen the value attributed to earlier stage

development projects fall and it has reset its strategy to focus on fewer nearer term projects in a

smaller number of markets.




Infratil Limited 5 Market Lane, PO Box 320, Wellington, New Zealand Tel +64-4-473 3663 www.infratil.com

Divestments and credit rating

Infratil sold more than $600 million of assets over the last year to focus on larger-scale investment

opportunities. A sale process is currently underway for its share of Australian medical imaging

provider Qscan, and last week it sold a NZ$495 million stake in listed investment Contact Energy.

There is the potential for another $1 billion or more of divestments over the medium term as Infratil

assesses the growth outlook and scale opportunities of its existing assets.

An inaugural BBB+ credit rating, assigned by S&P Global Ratings in December 2025, provides Infratil

with further financial flexibility by giving access to new debt markets, improved borrowing terms and

reduced financing costs. Infratil intends to lodge a Product Disclosure Statement for an inaugural offer

of capital bonds today[2] , which are expected to carry a BBB- S&P issue rating and intermediate equity

treatment (50% equity credit).

FY27 guidance and final FY26 dividend

Guidance for FY27:

• Proportionate Operational EBITDAF of NZ$1,300 to $1,400 million (excluding Corporate

Costs) up 21% at the mid-point on FY26 on a like-for-like basis

• Corporate costs of NZ$150 to $170 million

• Proportionate Development Spend of NZ$95 to $110 million

• Proportionate capital expenditure of NZ$3,800 to $4,400 million


Infratil confirmed it will pay an unimputed final dividend of 13.65 cents per share on 29 June 2026,

bringing total FY26 dividends to 20.9 cents per share. The dividend reinvestment plan (DRP)

will operate for the final dividend, with a 2% discount applied to the DRP strike price. A copy of the

DRP Offer Document is included with today’s announcement.

Virtual investor briefing: from 11.00am (NZT) at https://infratil.com/for-investors/results/



Notes:

[1] EBITDAF is an unaudited non-GAAP measure of consolidated net earnings before interest, tax, depreciation,

amortisation, financial derivative movements, impairments, revaluations, and gains or losses on the sale of investments.

EBITDAF also excludes acquisition and sale-related transaction costs, management incentive fees, and one-off project

costs. EBITDAF does not have a standardised meaning and should not be viewed in isolation, nor considered a substitute

for measures reported in accordance with NZ IFRS, as it may not be comparable to similar financial information presented

by other entities. Proportionate Operational EBITDAF represents Infratil’s share of EBITDAF from its investee companies,

excluding Contact Energy. It also excludes corporate costs and early-stage, non-capitalised Development Spend incurred by

Infratil’s early-stage renewables businesses. A reconciliation of net profit after tax to Proportionate EBITDAF is provided in

the FY26 Annual Results Presentation.

[2] Investors can register interest in the offer by contacting a Joint Lead Manager or their usual financial adviser. Indications

of interest will not constitute an obligation or commitment of any kind. No money is currently being sought and applications

for the Capital Bonds cannot currently be made. If Infratil offers the Capital Bonds, the Offer will be made in accordance with

the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013.




Infratil Limited 5 Market Lane, PO Box 320, Wellington, New Zealand Tel +64-4-473 3663 www.infratil.com

Enquiries should be directed to:


Brett Jackson

Infratil Investor Relations Director

Email: brett.jackson@infratil.com


Emma Myers

Communications Manager

Email: media@morrisonglobal.com


Authorised for release by:


Andrew Carroll

Infratil Chief Financial Officer

---

ANNUAL
RESULTS

PRESENTATION

FOR THE

YEAR ENDED

31 MARCH 2026

This presentation has been prepared by Infratil Limited (NZ company number 597366, NZX:IFT; ASX:IFT) (the ‘Company’)
To the maximum extent permitted by law, the Company, its affiliates and each of their respective affiliates, related bodies corporate, directors, officers, partners, employees and agents will not be liable

(whether in tort (including negligence) or otherwise) to you or any other person in relation to this presentation.

Information

This presentation contains summary information about the Company and its activities which is current as at the date of this presentation. The information in this presentation is of a general nature and does

not purport to be complete nor does it contain all the information which a prospective investor may require in evaluating a possible investment in the Company or that would be required in a product

disclosure statement under the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013 or the Australian Corporations Act 2001 (Cth). This presentation should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Annual Report for

the period ended 31 March 2026, market releases and other periodic and continuous disclosure announcements, which are available at www.nzx.com, www.asx.com.au or infratil.com/for-investors/.

Not financial product advice

This presentation is for information purposes only and is not financial, legal, tax, investment or other advice or a recommendation to acquire the Company’s securities and has been prepared without taking

into account the objectives, financial situation or needs of prospective investors.

Future Performance

This presentation may contain certain “forward-looking statements” about the Company and the environment in which the Company operates, such as indications of, and guidance on, future earnings,

financial position and performance. Forward-looking information is inherently uncertain and subject to contingencies outside of the Company’s control, and the Company gives no representation, warranty

or assurance that actual outcomes or performance will not materially differ from the forward-looking statements.

Non-GAAP Financial Information

This presentation contains certain financial information and measures that are “non-GAAP financial information” under the FMA Guidance Note on disclosing non-GAAP financial information, "non‐IFRS

financial information" under Regulatory Guide 230: ‘Disclosing non‐IFRS financial information’ published by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) and are not recognised under New

Zealand equivalents to International Financial Reporting Standards (NZ IFRS), Australian Accounting Standards (AAS) or International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). The non-IFRS/GAAP financial

information and financial measures include Proportionate EBITDAF, EBITDAF and EBITDA. The non-IFRS/GAAP financial information and financial measures do not have a standardised meaning prescribed

by the NZ IFRS, AAS or IFRS, should not be viewed in isolation and should not be construed as an alternative to other financial measures determined in accordance with NZ IFRS, AAS or IFRS, and therefore,

may not be comparable to similarly titled measures presented by other entities. Although Infratil believes the non-IFRS/GAAP financial information and financial measures provide useful information to

users in measuring the financial performance and condition of Infratil, you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any non-IFRS/GAAP financial information or financial measures included in this

presentation.

EBITDAF represents consolidated net earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, amortisation, financial derivative movements, impairments, revaluations, and gains or losses on the sale of investments.

EBITDAF also excludes acquisition and sale-related transaction costs, management incentive fees, and one-off project costs. Proportionate Operational EBITDAF represents Infratil’s share of EBITDAF from

its investee companies, excluding development spend associated with earlier-stage renewables businesses (Gurīn Energy, Galileo, and Mint Renewables), and excluding corporate costs and listed

company Contact Energy. Development Spend represents early-stage, non-capitalised expenditure incurred by Infratil’s earlier-stage renewables businesses. Further information on how Infratil calculates

Proportionate EBITDAF can be found in the Appendix.

No part of this presentation may be reproduced or provided to any person or used for any other purpose without express permission.

DISCLAIMER

1

AGENDA
INFRATIL ANNUAL RESULTS PRESENTATION

P O R T F O L I O O V E R V I E W & F U L L Y E A R H I G H L I G H T S

P O R T F O L I O P E R F O R M A N C E

G R O U P F I N A N C I A L P E R F O R M A N C E

Supporting MATERIALS

S U P P O R T I N G M AT E R I A L S

PA G E 3

PA G E 21

PA G E 27

PA G E 8

PORTFOLIO STRATEGY OUTLOOK

P O R T F O L I O S T R AT E GY & O U T L O O K

PA G E 31

2

ANNUAL
RESULTS

PRESENTATION

PORTFOLIO

OVERVIEW & FULL

YEAR HIGHLIGHTS

-50
0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

550

600

650

FY16FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

Infratil (IFT.NZX, IFT.ASX)

•Market capitalisation of NZ$16.0bn

1

(US$9.3bn)

•Included in S&P NZX 50, ASX 200, and

MSCI Global Standard Index

•Our target: shareholder returns of 11-15% per annum

on a rolling 10-year basis

A value-add infrastructure investment company

•Active portfolio construction and management with

multiple pillars of value creation over time

•Management partnership leverages Morrison’s

extensive global capabilities

A strong track record: 18.9% TSR

2

since 1994

3

Cumulative annual return (%)

Period

2

IFT TSR

5 – year 18.5%

10 – year21.0%

20 – year 15.1%

Since inception18.9%

Notes: (1) Market capitalisation as at 25 May 2026; (2) Infratil Returns are calculated to 25 May 2026; (3) Chart source: Capital IQ

(NZX50, ASX 200).

An infrastructure investment company that actively invests in ideas that matter

INFRATIL OVERVIEW

IFT

NZX50

ASX200

4

PORTFOLIO UPDATE
A diverse portfolio with significant growth opportunities

Portfolio changes

•Manawa Energy sold July 2025

•Contact Energy stake received July 2025

•RetireAustralia sold December 2025

•Infratil Property sold December 2025

•Anytime Radiology established December 2025

•Fortysouth sold April 2026

Portfolio composition (31 March 2026

1

)

Notes: (1) Based on a combination of independent valuation, market and book value. Chart excludes Fortysouth following its

subsequent sale.

5

Despite continued market ‘noise’, Proportionate Operational EBITDAF of $989.4 million was delivered, up 11% on FY25 and
towards the top end of the $960–$1,000 million guidance range

CDC nowa global scale data centre operator, with more than 1GW of contracted capacity and growth outlook supporting a

step change in future earnings. Its Moody’s Baa2 (stable) public credit rating provides additional flexibility to fund growth

Longroad Energy's growth is accelerating, supported by strong demand drivers and opportunities to scale. Developments

in other markets are taking more time (Gurīn Energy), or proving more challenging (Galileo)

Our largest New Zealand businesseswere resilient, with Wellington Airport and One NZ delivering positive EBITDAF

growth despite challenging market conditions in their respective sectors

On track to achieve the initial $1 billion divestment target, with $600 million of assets sold and a sale process underway for

Qscan. Post balance date, a $500 million stake in Contact has been sold to support future growth

Infratil’s inaugural S&P BBB+ (stable) credit rating gives access to new debt markets, improved borrowing terms and

reduced financing costs

Strong ESG performance is translating into higher ratings, such as MSCI AA, and inclusion in additional indices, including

the Dow Jones Best in Class Australia Index

Delivering growth in volatile markets

FY26 HIGHLIGHTS

6

(200)02004006008001,0001,200
FY24

FY25

FY26

05,00010,00015,00020,00025,000

FY24

FY25

FY26

Notes: (1) FY26 Proportionate operational EBITDAF includes corporate costs for the purposes of comparison to guidance and excludes

discontinued operations; (2) Assets are valued at either independent valuations, book values, or market values.

Portfolio momentum evident in key financial metrics

FY26 FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

$989 million

Proportionate Operational EBITDAF

1

$2.7 billion

Proportionate Capital Expenditure

$20.6 billion

Total Asset Value

$16.26 per share

Net Asset Value (post management fees)

20.9 cents per share

FY26 Dividend Declared

11%

17%

13%

5%

2%

CDC

One NZ

Kao Data

Longroad Energy

Contact Energy

Other renewables

Healthcare

Wellington Airport

Sold

Other

Corporate

Proportionate Operational EBITDAF

1

(NZ$m)

Asset value

2

(NZ$m)

7

ANNUAL
RESULTS

PRESENTATION

PORTFOLIO

PERFORMANCE

220
200

200

400

CDC Contracted Capacity (ICT MW)

1

Earnings step-change underway with over 1GW now contracted

CDC

FY26FY27FY28FY29Total

1GW+

Year in Review

•FY26 EBITDAF of A$393m, up A$63m (19%) from FY25

–220MW of invoiced ICT capacity at FY26 end

–555MW contract signed on 5 May lifts contracted ICT capacity

to 1GW+

–FY26 capex of A$2.11bn, up from A$1.76bn in FY25

–353MW of built operating capacity added during the year

–572MW under construction at FY26 end

–Capex per ICT MW varies by site, with current $/MW averages in

the mid-teens (excluding land)

•Well-capitalised balance sheet supports ongoing growth

–All major shareholders contributed A$500m in February 2026 to

support current growth plans

–CDC Australia assigned a public Baa2 credit rating (stable outlook)

on 21 April 2026

–FY26 actual weighted average cost of debt of ~6%

–Mandate announced for a hybrid AMTN wholesale bond on

25 May 2026

Notes: (1) MW expected to be invoiced by the end of each financial year. Timing for conversion of contracted capacity to billing is subject

to both site completion and customer activation.

9

Unprecedented demand continues, strong outlook for further growth
CDC

Outlook

•EBITDAF¹ expected to step up significantly as contracted capacity

comes online

–FY27 EBITDAF guidance of A$680m–A$720m

–EBITDAF expected to exceed A$1bn in FY28, subject to build

delivery timing and customer activation

–Fully deployed 1GW of contracted capacity is expected to deliver

~A$2bn of annualised contracted EBITDAF

•Capex steps up and continued development of the future pipeline

–FY27 capex guidance of A$3.8bn–A$4.2bn (excluding land), with

disciplined capital deployment aligned to revenue generation

–Ongoing acquisition of power and land to meet customer demand

–Densification also expected to support further capacity growth as

customer requirements and site opportunities evolve

•Growth outlook and demand remains very strong

–Contracting discussions progressing well for signings in H1 FY27

and beyond for further medium and large-scale deployments

–Actively progressing 1GW+ extension of growth pipeline to

accommodate future demand

EBITDAF

1

Growth (A$m)

271

330

392

FY24FY25FY26FY27GFY28F

680-720

$1bn+

+155%

Notes: (1) EBITDAF includes the straight-lining of lease revenue for contracts with fixed indexation over the term of the arrangement.

10

Well positioned to capture an outsized share of ongoing growth
CDC

Contracted earnings visibility and premium customer base

•Contracted earnings provide strong visibility over future cash flows

•Customer base dominated by government and hyperscale counterparties

Scale and efficient development economics

•Benefits from scale and demand-driven modular development

•Densification and technology evolution support attractive returns

Superior access to funding

•IG credit rating supports efficient pricing and broad access to debt markets

•Supportive long-term institutional shareholders committed to growth

Technology and sustainability advantage

•Design supports increased computing density and liquid cooling solutions

•Minimal water usage is a key differentiator in site development

237MW

Sydney

308MW

156MW

Canberra

20MW

181MW

Melbourne

210MW

98MW

Auckland

34MW

Perth

Data Centres

Under construction572MW

Operating capacity671MW

6715721,663

05001,0001,5002,0002,5003,000

Operating capacityUnder constructionFuture build

2.9GW capacity pipeline as at 31 March

1

Notes: (1) Built MW.

11

Delivering strong earnings growth as construction lifts to record 2GW
LONGROAD ENERGY

Year in Review

•EBITDAF of US$121m, up US$76m (170%) from FY25, including

contributions from Serrano (434MW, from April 25) and

Sun Streams 4 (677MW, from March 25)

•Opco run-rate EBITDAF of US$367m up US$93m (34%) from FY25

•3.5GW operational at FY26 end, with a further 2GW under

construction including:

–Sun Pond (Arizona solar + storage, 197MW, COD

1

achieved

in April 2026)

–1,000 Mile (Texas solar, 400MW, COD CY26)

–Milford Solar 2 (Utah solar, 392MW, COD CY27)

–Big Creek (Arkansas solar, 533MW, COD CY27)

•A further 1.7GW is expected to commence construction in FY27

•>6GW of projects qualified for tax credits, to support our

development targets out to 2030

–Solar projects required to be placed in service by the end of 2030

to maintain eligibility

–Battery storage tax credits accessible through 2037

Notes: (1) Commercial Operation Date; (2) Opco run-rate EBITDAF is calculated based on the five-year average EBITDAF once projects reach operational

status. Projects are included in Opco run-rate EBITDAF based on the year of financial close, with all corporate overheads and development-related costs added

back; (3) addback of all Longroad corporate overheads and development-related expenses, as well as normalisation for differences between actual operating

performance and the expected five-year average, and adjustments for non-controlling interests in projects.

FY26 EBITDAF to Opco run-rate EBITDAF

2

(US$m)

GenerationSolarBatteryWindTransmission

Operating assets2.3GW0.7GW0.5GW-

Under construction1.7GW0.2GW0.1GW

45

121

367

40

144

62

FY25 EBITDAFFY26 EBITDAFCorporate

overheads &

Development

expenses

3

Projects under

construction

OpCo run-rate

EBITDAF FY26

102

Corporate

Development

12

490
640

770

860

70

140

CY25CY26FCY27FCY28FCY29F

350

840

1,000

New very large-scale project, robust demand ups annual cadence to avg. 2GW p.a.

LONGROAD ENERGY

•Following years of modest growth in U.S. electricity consumption,

demand is projected to increase by ~30-50% by 2040, driven by

data centres, electrification, and growth in domestic manufacturing

1

•In April, agreed to acquire a ~2.8GW solar + storage project, which

would deliver targeted uptick in development cadence on its own:

–PPA in place; expected to begin construction in two phases in

CY28 and CY29

–progress contingent on state regulatory approval of the

acquisition and PPA, and land lease extension which is subject

to federal approval

•CY25 target projects contracted or in late stage discussions, with

ongoing robust demand, >6GW tax qualified pipeline and new very

large-scale project underpinning our targeted increase in

development cadence to reach US$1 billion in run rate earnings by

CY29/30

New data centre strategy

•Actively progressing options to develop 4GW+ of grid connected

data centres co-located with Longroad solar + storage projects.

Options to develop powered shell, alone or with partners, or

monetise as powered land

Opco run-rate EBITDAF

2

Notes: (1) Source: American Clean Power Association; (2) Opco run-rate EBITDAF is calculated based on the five-year average EBITDAF once projects reach

operational status. Projects are included in Opco run-rate EBITDAF based on the year of financial close, with all corporate overheads and development-

related costs added back. (3) An additional 2GW has been evenly spread over CY28 and CY29 to reflect targeted upsize in development cadence.

GenerationCY25CY26FCY27FCY28F

3

CY29F

3

Operating assets3.5GW4.2GW5.9GW6.4GW8.0GW

Under construction1.8GW2.9GW2.8GW4.8GW5.7GW

Total Portfolio5.3GW7.1GW8.7GW11.2GW13.7GW

Annual growth forecast+1.5GW+1.8GW+1.6GW+2.5GW+2.5GW

Illustrative impact of increasing avg. cadence to 2.0GW p.a.

September 25 investor day Opco run-rate EBITDAF guidance

13

Under construction
3

Operating

3

2,347MW

Solar

1,665MW

729MW

Battery

210MW

458MW

Wind

Transmission

100MW

Infratilhas agreed to invest further US$300m to supportLongroad’s acceleration

LONGROAD ENERGY

Arizona

111MW

1,093MW

729MW

85MW

Texas

121MW

723MW

400MW

Arkansas

533MW

New Mexico

67MW

Minnesota

31MW

California

282MW

98MW

75MW

Maine

184MW

50

20

210

80

FY27F EBITDAFCorporate overheads

& Development

expenses

2

Full year contribution

from projects

comissioned in year

Projects under

construction

OpCo run-rate

EBITDAF FY27F

120 - 135

490

130

FY27F EBITDAF to Opco run-rate EBITDAF

Guidance

•FY27 EBITDAF guidance of US$120m–US$135m

1

. Modest uplift


as constructioncompletes in the back end of FY27 and in FY28,

and due to increased development expenses

•FY27 Opco run-rate EBITDAF on track for ~US$490m across the

7.1GW operating and under construction fleet

Funding

•Infratil has agreed to provide an additional US$300m of equity

funding to support Longroad’s acceleration, to be deployed over

the next ~2 years

Notes: (1) Guidance prepared in alignment with the Infratil financial year of 31 March 2027; (2) addback of all Longroad corporate overheads and

development-related expenses, as well as normalisation for differences between actual operating performance and the expected five-year average, and

adjustments for non-controlling interests in projects; (3) Total figures include rounding.

Utah

522MW

306MW

50MW

100MW

14

Corporate

Development

GURIN ENERGY GALILEO
Project Vanda awaiting key approval Market headwinds encourage a reset

•Project Vanda: Indonesia to Singapore utility-scale solar

–Land secured for solar ~2GW + ~1GW battery

–Indonesia granted production licence in March; still awaiting

export licence as key gate to final investment decision

–Ownership: 75% Gurīn Energy; 25% Gentari

–Expected capex US$2-3bn, requiring ~US$500m equity

•Malaysia: projects for data centre supply opportunities

•Philippines: Zambales 75MW solar delivered US$6m revenue;

Tarlac 39MW project expected to be operational Q3 FY27

•Japan: 240MW battery storage project reached ready-to-build

status

•South Korea: acquired 300MW wind + solar pipeline

•Many individual European markets reaching maturity

–Moving away from high values for earlier stage projects

–Targeted returns more difficult to achieve at any point in the project

lifecycle

•Strategy reset in H2 FY26 to position Galileo as an independentpower

producer and take projects through construction and operations

–Focus on fewer markets where power demand, power prices,

connection conditions and regulation allow pipeline deployment at

attractive returns

–Focus on sales in other markets to allow capital recycling and

focused effort

•Write-offs and write-downs of €61.2 million (IFT share €23.3 million)

recognised to reflect a narrower strategic focus and reduced values of

early-stage projects

•Target is 700–900MW operational, or in construction, by 2030

–First project operational: 3MW solar in Lombardy, Italy

–Second Lombardy 5MW solar project starting construction

Notes: (1) Prior to shareholder equity injections.

15

Delivering revenue growth in a challenging market
ONE NZ

Year in Review

•EBITDAF +$4m to $609m with mobile momentum

balancingincreased costs and strategic spend

•Mobile performing well in higher-value segments

–Mobile connections grew, lifting network utilisation

–Postpaid expansion; mobile ARPU $36.60 vs $35.50 (FY25)

–One Wallet phone redemptions up ~5x vs FY25, reducing churn

–Handset & Other revenue +$74m

•5G up to 70% pop. coverage: 3G network exit unlocks spectrum

•EonFibre's first full year of operation, delivering ~$65m EBITDAF

•IT investment and simplification continuing to drive benefits

–Free cash flow +$67m vs FY25, with reduced capex

andinvestment, andinclusive of one-off property incentives

–$183m distributions to IFT made up of $159m of shareholder

loan interest and repayments and $24m of subvention payments

(up from $91 million in FY25)

801

831

847

424

325

399

212

223

225

212

203

202

348

340

325

FY24FY25FY26

1,996

1,921

1,998

Consumer FixedEnterpriseWholesaleHandset & OtherMobile

1,982

1,963

1,979

379

364

347

FY24FY25FY26

2,361

2,3272,325

Fixed connectionsMobile Connections

Revenue (NZ$m)

Connections (000’s)

16

Ongoing focus on delivery and simplification
ONE NZ

Outlook

•NZ markets remain low growth, with weak net migration and ongoing

macroeconomic headwinds

–Enterprise and fixed markets challenging

–Annual price increase implemented across mobile + fixed in April

•EonFibre gaining traction as wholesale high-capacity

bandwidth provider, with good data centre demandand a material

hyperscaler contract (subsea) in Q4 FY26

•Investment in mobile growth, IT and AI-first initiatives continues,

accompanied by careful cost discipline

–50+ AI solutions in operation; focus on short-term payback

Guidance

•FY27 EBITDAF $600m to $640m

–Target: EBITDAF margin mid-30% in medium term through mobile

growth, increased wholesale revenues, simplification and cost

efficiency

•FY27 capex $235m to $265m (excl. spectrum)

–Target: capex intensity ~11% in medium term as network and IT

modernisation spend tapers

600

605

609

30%

31%

30%

37

61

128

82

91

183

FY24FY25FY26

Free cash flowDistributions

Notes: (1) For free cash flow calculation refer to the Detailed Financial Information & Operating Metrics – March 2026 disclosure.

Free cash flow (NZ$m) & Distributions (NZ$m)

EBITDAF (NZ$m) & Margin (%)

17

FY24FY25FY26

Resilient EBITDAF in challenging domestic market
WELLINGTON AIRPORT

Year in Review

•EBITDAF increased 2.3% to $133m, supported by strong international

growth, further diversification of commercial operations, disciplined

cost control, and higher aeronautical pricing

•International passengers grew 4% to 823k (FY25: 791k)

•Domestic passengers declined 6% to 4.26m (FY25: 4.53m), reflecting

a weak economy and airline capacity constraints

•$112m invested in infrastructure, including the runway safety upgrade

(completed March), a new 800-space car park, a new fire station, and

enhanced terminal hospitality areas

Outlook

•FY27 EBITDAF guidance $130m to $140 million

•Runway safety upgrade enables long-haul flights to Asia and beyond

•MoU signed with Guangzhou Baiyun International Airport (China) to

explore partnership opportunities

•Despite easing capacity constraints, fuel cost pressures are limiting

expansion, with airlines scaling back domestic schedules amid

ongoing Middle East uncertainty

Passengers (m)

0.7

0.80.8

4.74.5

4.3

FY24FY25FY26

5.4

5.3

5.1

Passengers DomesticPassengers International

107

130

133

71%

FY24

74%

FY25

74%

FY26

EBITDAF (NZ$m) & Margin (%)

18

Doubled contracted capacity, new prime London site added
KAO DATA

Year in Review

•Revenue

1

of £48m, up 28% from £38m in FY25 as previously

contracted capacity came online

–EBITDAF of £4.7m, up 9% (£0.4m) from FY25

•Operating capacity increased from 29MW to 37MW, with additions

at Harlow and Slough

•Construction of KLON-03 (17.6MW) progressing, designed for

GPU-driven AI workloads and rack densities up to 130kW, with

capacity online from early 2027

•Strong contracting momentum, with materially all operating and

under construction capacity contracted at year-end, including

KLON-03

Outlook

•London market remains constrained by land and power,

supporting pricing and development value

•With all current capacity contracted, Kao acquired a 4.7-acre West

London greenfield site for development

–New 30MW+ West London site targeted for 2029 delivery, in a

prime availability zone expected to attract broad demand,

including hyperscale customers

23

29

37

26

18

64

72

106

9

FY24FY25FY26

96

127

161

Future buildUnder constructionOperating

Kao Data built capacity pipeline (MW)

25

38

48

Revenue

1

(£m)

Notes: (1) Excludes energy pass through revenue.

19

FY24FY25FY26

HEALTHCARE
•EBITDAF of $121m, down 4% ($5m) from

FY25

1

–1.02m scans completed, up from 1.01m

–Radiologist workforce: 170 (up 6)

–Standalone clinics: 66 (down 6)

•Cost and competition pressures, together

with a mix shift to lower margin work drove

the reduction in EBITDAF

•Performance improvement

programme focused on pricing, productivity

and cost-saving initiatives

•Focus on supporting public and private

healthcare systems as imaging demand

continues to grow

•FY27 EBITDAF guidance of NZ$115-$135m

•EBITDAF of A$87m, up 12% (A$10m) from FY25

1

–1.5m scans completed, up from 1.45m

–Radiologist workforce: 192 (up 28)

–Standalone clinics: 80 (up 6)

•Earnings growth supported by rising

demand, pricing discipline, higher margin

work and strong execution

•Expanded footprint and capability through

organic growth and integrating seven

practices

•Investing in advanced imaging and digital

tools, including AI-enabled reporting, to

improve productivity and clinical outcomes

•Business performing strongly, providing a

solid base for the strategic review currently

underway; update expected in H1 FY27

•FY27 EBITDAF guidance of A$90-$105m

•Standalone teleradiology provider established

from RHCNZ and Qscan

•Dedicated management team alongside Infratil

and doctor shareholders

•Pure-play teleradiology model servicing 57

acute hospitals across Australasia

•Provides dedicated capacity for urgent and

overflow studies, improving utilisation and

reporting throughput

•Well positioned to benefit from ongoing

technology advances, including AI

•Active discussions with public and private

counterparties to grow third-party revenue

•First full quarter of operations materially in line

with forecast and investment case

•Expected to deliver annual EBITDAF of

~A$10m

Note: (1) EBITDAF has been presented aligned to FY26 guidance.

20

ANNUAL
RESULTS

PRESENTATION

GROUP FINANCIAL

PERFORMANCE

Increased operational capacity at CDC and Longroad drove EBITDAF growth in FY26
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE HIGHLIGHTS

47

3

50

2

2

1

CDCOne NZLongroad

Energy

Qscan

Group

Wellington

Airport

Other

(12)

Corporate

989

FY26

EBITDAF

895

FY25

EBITDAF

Notes: (1) Further information on how Infratil calculates Proportionate EBITDAF can be found in the supporting materials including a

reconciliation to net profit after tax; (2) excludes EBITDAF contributions from Manawa Energy, RetireAustralia, Fortysouth and Infratil Property.

$2,687 million

Up 17% from FY25

Proportionate capital expenditure

($70 million)

Up 2% from FY25

Proportionate development spend

$1,336 million

Up 42% from FY25

Infratil investment

$549.8 million

Up $845m from FY25

Net parent surplus

Highlights

•Proportionate operational EBITDAF was $989.4m, up $94.1m

(10.5%) on FY25, as CDC and Longroad capacity growth drove

increased contributions

•Proportionate development spend was $70.1m, up $1.5m

(2.2%) on FY25 reflecting continued spend across renewables

development platforms

•Proportionate capex was $2.7bn, up $392.2m (17.1%) on

FY25, driven by increased expenditure at CDC and Kao Data,

partially offset by decreases at One NZ and Longroad

•Infratil direct investment was $1.3bn, up $397.2m (42.3%) on

FY25. The largest investment in the period was $556m into

CDC reflecting completion of our increased shareholding and

subsequent funding of future growth.

Proportionate Operational EBITDAF

2

(NZ$m)

22

Growth reflects growth performance alongside continued equity investment
VALUATION UPDATE

1,685

31

164

606

277

60

22

136

114

137

35

AnytimeQscan Group

(73)

Mint RenewablesGurīn EnergyGalileo

(69)

Longroad EnergyContact EnergyKao DataOne NZ

(327)

CDC

FY25

portfolio

asset

value

18,304

FortySouth

3

(477)

Clearvision VenturesDivested asets

2

FY26

portfolio

asset

value

Wellington AirportRHCNZ

20,624

Movements in Infratil’s share of valuations

•Infratil’s total asset value increased to $20.6bn, up $2.3bn on

FY25, including$1.3bn investment by Infratil

•CDC’s valuation increased $1.7bn, including the acquisition of

an additional 1.58% in early FY25 and A$250m capital

injection in February 2026

•One NZ’s valuation reduced by $327m, reflecting

macroeconomic and competitive conditions

•Contact Energy replaced Manawa Energy in the portfolio (July

2025) with another 4.92% acquired in October 2025

•Longroad’s valuation increased $277m, driven by new

operational capacity

•Galileo decreased $69m reflecting softening values across

early-stage development projects, with write-downs/offs of

projects across its pipeline partially offset by $53m of equity

contributions (IFT share)

•RHCNZ decreased $73m, reflecting challenging trading and

revised long term growth assumptions

Asset Valuations (NZ$m)

1

Notes: (1) Reflecting Infratil’s share of valuations as at 31 March 2026. Based on a combination of independent valuation, market and

book value; (2) Divested assets includes RetireAustralia and Infratil Property; (3) Fortysouth was divested in April 2026.


23

Moderate dividend growth balanced with capital needs of the portfolio
DIVIDEND

13.00

7.00

FY24

13.25

7.25

FY25

13.65

7.25

FY26

Final dividendInterim dividend

Final Dividend

•13.65 cents per share, with no imputation credits attached

•Record date: 10 June 2026 (ex-dividend date:9 June)

•Payment date: 29 June 2026

•NZD/AUD rate to be set on 10 June 2026 and announced on

11 June 2026

Dividend reinvestment plan (DRP)

•Available for the final FY26 dividend with 2% discount

•DRP elections must be made by 11 June 2026

•10-day VWAP period is 12 to 25 June 2026 (inclusive)

•Strike price announced 26 June 2026

Infratil net dividend (cents per share)

24

Investment grade profile unlocks material benefits and resilience
FUNDING AND LIQUIDITY

156

102

146

273

365

204

123

371

500

371

175

107

625

4

120

220

232

FY27FY28FY29FY30FY31FY32FY33>FY33

BondsBank Debt DrawnBank Debt UndrawnAcquisition FacilitiesIFTHA

Highlights

•Inaugural S&P BBB+ (stable) credit rating secured in December 2025,

enables reduced funding costs and broader access to diverse capital

sources

•Bank debt refinance completed in May 2026, realising cost savings

and improved terms that enhance financial flexibility

•Infratil intends to lodge a PDS for an inaugural offer of capital bonds

today, which are expected to carry a BBB- S&P issue rating and

intermediate equity treatment (50% equity credit). Enhances funding

flexibility and supports investment grade credit profile of Infratil

•Further activity expected to diversify funding sources, adding long-

term balance sheet resilience

•Investment grade rating is expected to deliver savings of ~$7m per

annum in FY27, increasing to ~$10m over time.

•$1.1 billion of available liquidity supports future growth, further

enhanced by ~$495m of proceeds realised post balance date from

Contact Energy partial sell-down

Capital Bonds PDS: Investors can register interest in the offer by contacting a Joint Lead

Manager or their usual financial adviser. Indications of interest will not constitute an

obligation or commitment of any kind. No money is currently being sought and

applications for the Capital Bonds cannot currently be made. If Infratil offers the Capital

Bonds, the Offer will be made in accordance with the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013.

Notes: (1) Funding and Liquidity metrics are based on the methodologies set out on slide 41, aligned to S&P treatment. Net debt includes

pro forma adjustment for unconditional Fortysouth divestment proceeds receivable at 31 March 2026.

Funding and Liquidity (NZ$m)

1

Debt maturity profile (NZ$m)

25

725

2265

2188

2988

89

135

151

161

1492

820

1438

1109

8%

17%

13%

15%

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

16%

18%

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

4500

FY23FY24FY25FY26

Net debtRecourse letters of credit issuedLiquidity availableLoan to Value

FY27 Proportionate Operational EBITDAF guidance range set at NZ$1,300 to $1,400 million
FY27 GUIDANCE

Capital Expenditure (100%)

Component Guidance

CDCA$3,800-$4,200m

One NZNZ$235-$265m

Kao Data£175-£195m

Longroad EnergyUS$1,500-$1,700m

Wellington AirportNZ$50-$80m

RHCNZ

NZ$30-$50m (IFT Share)

Qscan Group

Gurīn, Galileo, and MintNZ$115-$135m (IFT Share)

Notes: (1) Guidance is based on Infratil management’s current expectations and assumptions about trading performance, is subject to risks

and uncertainties, and dependent on prevailing market conditions continuing throughout the outlook period.

EBITDAF (100%)Component Guidance

CDCA$680-$720m

One NZNZ$600-$640m

Longroad EnergyUS$120-$135m

RHCNZNZ$115-$135m

Qscan GroupA$90-$105m

Wellington AirportNZ$130-$140m

Development SpendNZ$95-$110m (IFT share)

Corporate costsNZ$150-$170m

Guidance

•Proportionate Operational EBITDAF guidance range of:

NZ$1,300–NZ$1,400 million

–An increase of ~21% on FY26 on a like-for-like basis

–Proportionate Operational EBITDAF guidance has been prepared

excluding Corporate Costs

•Proportionate Development Spend guidance range of:

NZ$95–NZ$110 million

–An increase of ~46% on FY26

•Corporate costs guidance range of NZ$150-NZ$170 million,

•Proportionate Capital Expenditure guidance range of

$3,800 million - $4,400 million

–An increase of ~53% on FY26 on a like-for-like basis

•Forecast exchange rates to NZD used in setting Group guidance:

AUD 0.8382, USD 0.5769, EUR 0.4958, and GBP 0.4368

26

ANNUAL
RESULTS

PRESENTATION

PORTFOLIO

STRATEGY &

OUTLOOK

Portfolio Health and Safety
•No fatalities

•LTIFR

2

0.6; TRIFR

2

1.2, in line with FY25

CDC

•WUE less than 0.02

•100% renewable electricity offered

Portfolio coverage SBTi

•Target: 60% by 2028

•As at 31 March 2026: 23.4%

Longroad Energy

•14 weeks paid parental leave

•29 burrowing owls fledged

Community investment

•Proportionate portfolio investment,

including Infratil: $2.4m

One NZ

•1st rooftop solar project

•91t operational e-waste, 99% recycled

Notes: (1) Visit Infratil's website for: Climate Related Disclosures, Modern Slavery Report, and ESG Data Book; (2) Total Recordable Injury

and Loss Time Injury Frequency Rates, based on 200,000 hours on a weighted average basis by employees.

SUSTAINABILITY HIGHLIGHTS

ESG Rating uplift driven by disclosure and delivery

Rating bodyLatest

rating

Previous

rating

GRESB9486

MSCI ESGAAA

S&P CSA3823

Sustainalytics ESG Risk6.68.5

Forsyth Barr Climate & ESGA-B+

CDPBC

External Ratings Assessments

28

Inclusion in S&P Dow Jones

Best in Class Australia Index

Solid progress against strategy
MEDIUM-TERM STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES

Divest businesses unlikely to scale

under our ownership and reinvest

•$600m of sales completed; Qscan process underway

•Potential for another $1 billion+ of divestments over the medium term

Balance Infratil’s cash flow and

dividends

•On track with One NZ's improved distributionprofile; growth expected from

CDC and Longroad as earnings and future distribution capacity grows

Identify and scale our growth

platforms beyond CDC and

Longroad Energy

•CDC and Longroad have accelerated materially, setting a high bar; however

interesting adjacent opportunities are emerging across these platforms

•Gurīn Energy still awaiting key approval

Continue to broaden our

shareholder base and support

future scale

•ASX 200 inclusion has seen ASX trading volume lift to ~30%

•Increased analyst coverage helping grow interest, work in progress

29

CDC has a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to develop AI infrastructure at globally relevant scale, with strong
demand, project pipeline, capability and funding flexibility to continue to accelerate

Longroad is also capitalising on the opportunity, targeting increased development and US$1bn run-rate

EBITDAF by CY29/30, backed by new very large-scale project, subject to regulatory approvals

Continuing to develop other potentially material growth opportunities including Longroad’s data centre

options and Gurin’s Vanda project

Infratil has significant flexibility to support that growth, supported by improved cash flow profile, ongoing

divestment programme and inaugural S&P BBB+ credit rating

Continued focus on lifting operational performance across the portfolio, with strong progress by One NZ

and Qscan, and improvement plans in place for RHCNZ and Galileo

We have navigated the noise of 2025, are realistic about the challenges that persist, and are as positive as

ever about the opportunities and options for the portfolio ahead

Portfolio positioning for further step changes in growth

LOOKING AHEAD

30

SUPPORTING
MATERIALS

1
1

2

5

4

3

1

2

4

3

United States: 13%Europe: 5%Asia: 3%Australia: 47%New Zealand: 32%

1

3

4

3

21

5

22

4

1

1

1

2

3

3

ASSET LOCATIONS

32

NET ASSET VALUES
Commentary

•The table represents Infratil’s proportionate share of an asset's

independent valuation, market value, or book value

•CDC, One NZ, Kao Data, Longroad Energy, Galileo, Gurīn Energy, Mint

Renewables, RHCNZ Medical Imaging, Qscan Group, and Wellington

Airport reflect the midpoint 31 March 2026 independent valuations

•The fair value of Contact Energy is shown based on the market price of

$9.25 as at 31 March 2026, based on Infratil’s shareholding at that date

•Clearvision and Anytime Radiology reflect their accounting book values

as at 31 March 2026

•The carrying value of Fortysouth reflects the final sale price, which

completed in April 2026

•An illustrative estimate of thepresent value of the management

agreement is presented here, based on an assumption that Infratil’s

total shareholder return is in the middle of its target return range of 11 –

15%, withincentive fees on international assets calculated to accrue at

the same rate. These fees are discounted over a 5 year period.

1

31 March ($Millions)20252026

CDC$7,248.5 $8,933.2

One NZ$3,713.5 $3,386.7

FortySouth$186.3 $217.0

Kao Data$701.6 $865.4

Manawa Energy$788.8 -

Contact Energy- $1,394.5

Longroad Energy$2,111.9 $2,389.3

Galileo$326.0 $257.1

Gurīn Energy$493.0 $553.3

Mint Renewables$22.8 $44.8

RHCNZ Medical Imaging$689.3 $616.4

Qscan Group$454.5 $590.1

Anytime Radiology-$114.0

RetireAustralia$404.3 -

Wellington Airport$933.9 $1,070.7

Clearvision Ventures$156.2 $191.5

Property$73.1 -

Portfolio asset value$18,303.7 $20,624.0

Wholly owned group net debt($2,187.8)($3,204.6)

PV of management agreement($1,128.5)($1,168.4)

Net asset value$14,987.4 $16,251.0

Shares on issue (m)968.1 999.3

Net asset value per share$15.48 $16.26

33

Notes: (1) The illustrative fees model used to estimate the present value of the management agreement is available on Infratil’s website.

PORTFOLIO RETURNS AS AT 31 MARCH 2026
AssetSegmentGeography

Month of Initial

Investment

Duration

(years)

Total capital

invested

1


(NZD)

Total realised

proceeds

2

(NZD)

Total unrealised

proceeds

3


(NZD)

Total value

4


(NZD)

IRR

(NZD)

CDCDigital InfrastructureAustralasia

September 20169.6 1,588 169 8,933 9,102 35.8%

One NZDigital InfrastructureNew Zealand

July 20196.7 2,852 1,386 3,387 4,773 16.5%

Kao DataDigital InfrastructureUnited Kingdom

August 20214.6 574 - 865 865 15.4%

FortysouthDigital InfrastructureNew Zealand

October 20223.4 212 9 217 226 1.8%

Clearvision VenturesDigital InfrastructureUnited States

March 201610.1 105 2 192 193 13.0%

Longroad EnergyRenewable EnergyUnited States

October 20169.4 830 308 2,389 2,698 47.3%

Manawa Energy

5

Renewable EnergyNew Zealand

April 199431.3 395 2,607 - 2,607 18.0%

Contact Energy

7

Renewable EnergyNew Zealand

July 20250.7 1,356 44 1,395 1,439 7.5%

Gurīn EnergyRenewable EnergyAsia

July 20214.7 265 1 553 554 44.4%

GalileoRenewable EnergyEurope

February 20206.1 205 - 257 257 9.9%

Mint RenewablesRenewable EnergyAustralia

December 20223.3 36 - 45 45 14.4%

RHCNZ Medical Imaging

6

HealthcareNew Zealand

May 20214.8 576 149 616 765 8.6%

Qscan Group

6

HealthcareAustralia

December 20205.3 385 103 590 693 14.1%

Anytime RadiologyHealthcareAustralasia

December 20250.3 119 6 114 120 N/M

RetireAustraliaHealthcareAustralia

December 201411.0 370 373 - 373 0.1%

Wellington AirportAirportsNew Zealand

November 199827.4 96 696 1,071 1,767 17.4%

Infratil PropertyOtherNew Zealand

December 200718.0 91 162 - 162 8.4%

Notes:

1.Total capital invested is equal to the sum of all capital invested by Infratil into the asset during the holding period, and consists of initial capital contributions, shareholder loan contributions, capital calls, and acquisition of management

shares vesting under LTI schemes

2.Total realised proceeds is equal to the sum of all distributions received by Infratil during the holding period and consists of capital returns, shareholder loan interest payments, shareholder loan principal payments, dividends, and

subvention payments.

3.Total unrealised proceeds is equal to the valuation of Infratil’s stake in each of its assets. These valuations are aligned to Infratil asset values as summarised on page 35

4.Total value is equal to total realised proceeds plus total unrealised proceeds

5.A non-cash benefit equal to the value of Infratil’s share of Tilt on split from Trustpower has been recognised in Total realised proceeds for Manawa to capture the value of the embedded option within Manawa

6.A non-cash benefit equal to the value of Infratil's capital contributions into Qscan and RHCNZ which reflected the purchase of Teleradiology assets by Anytime Radiology has been recognised

7.As Contact Energy has been held for less than a year its IRR has been de-annualised to reflect the shorter holding period

34

INCENTIVE FEES
•The incentive fee is calculated based on 20% of the outperformance of an international asset’s valuation above a 12% hurdle

•As at 31 March 2026, a realised incentive fee of negative $21.2 million and an annual incentive fee of negative $18.2 million have been calculated

•The realised negative fee has been offset against the current incentive fee bank and will reduce the fee payable as at 31 March 2026

•The $18.2 million negative annual fee will be carried forward to the next fiscal year and be used to reduce any positive fees earned

31 March ($millions)FY25 Valuation

2

CapitalFXDistributionsHurdleFY26 Valuation

1

OutperformanceIncentive Fee

Annual Incentive Fee

CDC(7,212.2) (555.7)- 6.9 (894.6)8,888.5 232.9 46.6

Kao Data(694.5) (98.3)(10.7)- (88.0)856.7 (34.8)(7.0)

Longroad Energy(1,728.2) (48.7)(1.9)- (212.1)1,886.9 (104.0)(20.8)

Galileo(321.1) (53.4)(0.4)- (42.0)253.2 (163.7)(32.7)

Gurin Energy(485.6) (92.8)(4.1)- (65.2)545.0 (102.7)(20.5)

Mint Renewables(22.6) (14.5)- - (3.6)44.3 3.6 0.7

Qscan(450.0) - - - (54.0)581.8 77.8 15.6

Annual Total(10,914.3) (863.5)(17.0)6.9 (1,359.5)13,056.5 (90.9)(18.2)

Realised Incentive Fee

RetireAustralia(404.2) - - - (35.0)333.0 (106.2)(21.2)

(11,318.6) (863.5)(17.0)6.9 (1,394.5)13,389.5 (197.1)(39.4)

Notes: (1) Valuations for the purposes of the incentive fee are calculated net of estimated costs of disposal and any potential capital gains

taxes; (2) Signs are negative to enable calculation across to determine outperformance.

35

Year ended 31 March ($Millions) Share20252026
CDC49.7% $173.9 $220.4

One NZ99.8% $604.0 $607.4

Kao Data54.7% $4.9 $5.8

Longroad Energy42.0% $27.3 $77.5

RHCNZ Medical Imaging 56.8% $63.2 $63.6

Qscan Group59.5% $48.7 $50.9

Wellington Airport66.0% $86.1 $88.1

Operational EBITDAF$1,008.1$1,113.7

Galileo38.0% ($26.7)($24.6)

Gurīn Energy95.0% ($32.0)($30.6)

Mint Renewables73.0% ($9.9)($14.9)

Development Spend($68.6)($70.1)

Corporate costs100%($112.8)($124.3)

Proportionate EBITDAF (continuing)$826.7 $919.3

Fortysouth20.0% $13.6 $15.6

Manawa Energy51.1% $46.6 $12.5

RetireAustralia50.0% $21.6 $20.1

Infratil Property100.0% $9.3 $6.5

Total Proportionate EBITDAF$917.8 $974.0

•Proportionate Operational EBITDAF presented earlier is on the FY26 guidance basis and includes

corporate costs. From FY27, guidance will be provided excluding corporate costs, which will be provided

separately. Proportionate Operational EBITDAF is Infratil’s share of the EBITDAF of the companies it has

invested in and is before interest, tax, depreciation, amortisation, financial derivative movements,

impairments, revaluations, and gains or losses on the sales of investments

•Proportionate capital expenditure shows Infratil’s share of the investment spending of investee companies.

PROPORTIONATE EBITDAF AND CAPITAL EXPENDITURE

Year ended 31 March ($Millions)20252026

CDC$928.2 $1,181.9

One NZ$269.3 $245.2

Kao Data$82.8 $251.7

Longroad Energy$805.6 $777.7

Gurīn Energy$39.5 $68.2

Galileo$52.6 $42.7

Mint Renewables$0.5 $0.3

RHCNZ Medical Imaging$25.3 $26.6

Qscan Group$13.1 $18.6

Wellington Airport$77.5 $73.7

Capital expenditure (continuing)$2,294.4$2,686.6

Fortysouth$4.8$9.1

Manawa Energy$26.5$5.0

RetireAustralia$62.8 $49.4

Proportionate capital expenditure$2,388.5$2,750.1

Proportionate EBITDAFProportionate Capital Expenditure

36

Year ended 31 March ($Millions)20252026
CDC$494.2 $555.7

One NZ$20.9 $0.6

Kao Data$82.9 $98.3

Longroad Energy$163.4 $48.7

Gurīn Energy$67.5 $92.8

Galileo$41.9 $53.4

Contact Energy-$293.9

Mint Renewables$11.7 $14.5

RHCNZ Medical Imaging$48.1 $49.1

Anytime Radiology-$119.5

Clearvision$8.0 $9.3

Infratil Investments$938.6 $1,335.8

Commentary

•Direct investment reflects capital deployed by Infratil to acquire new

investments, increase holdings in existing assets, or fund capital

contributions to investee companies.

•CDC investment reflects settlement of the acquisition of an additional

1.58% of ordinary shares in May 2025, alongside Infratil’s participation

in CDC’s A$500 million capital raise in February 2026.

•Kao Data investment primarily supports continued development of the

Harlow data centre campus and acquisition of a new West London

greenfield site for development.

•Contact Energy investment reflects a 50% cash payment to acquire

TECT Holdings’ 4.92% stake in October 2025 (the remaining 50% was

funded through the issuance of Infratil shares), alongside participation

in Contact’s February equity raise.

•Anytime Radiology investment relates to the carve-out of the

teleradiology businesses from Qscan and RHCNZ Medical Imaging.

•Longroad Energy equity injections have supported new projects as they

reach financial close and commence construction.

•Gurīn Energy, Galileo, and Mint Renewables investments support

platform growth and development of their respective pipelines.

INFRATIL DIRECT INVESTMENT

37

Commentary
•This table reflects the cash flow of the Infratil wholly-owned group

and reconciles opening and closing cash balances.

•A breakdown of distributions received and capital invested by asset

is provided in the Detailed Financial Information and Operating

Metrics tables released alongside this presentation.

•International Portfolio Incentive fees paid during the period include

Tranche 1 of the FY25 annual incentive fee of $116.9 million, Tranche

2 of the FY24 annual incentive fee of $30.4 million, and Tranche 3 of

the FY23 annual incentive fee of $54.6 million, of which $80.0 million

was paid in scrip to Infratil’s Manager.

INFRATIL CORPORATE CASH FLOW

Year ended 31 March ($Millions)20252026

Distributions received from portfolio companies$258.0$336.8

Management fees($109.3)($122.8)

Net interest($115.1)($144.5)

Other corporate operating cash flows($29.7)($16.3)

Net cash inflow/(outflow) from operating activities$3.9$53.2

Infratil direct investment($938.6)($1,335.8)

Proceeds from portfolio divestments-$567.1

Other investment costs($16.3)($7.8)

Incentive fees paid($106.8)($122.0)

Net cash inflow/(outflow) from investing activities($1,061.7)($895.5)

Dividends paid($124.1)($140.7)

Net bond issuance$170.0($41.1)

Debt drawdown/(repayment)($194.4)$1,010.4

Equity raised$1,258.8-

Net cash inflow/(outflow) from financing cashflows$1,110.3$828.6

Net increase/(decrease) in cash$52.5($16.7)

Cash and equivalents at the beginning of the year$19.2$71.9

Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents$52.5($16.7)

FX gains/(losses) on cash and cash equivalents$0.2($19.0)

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year$71.9$36.2

38

EARNINGS RECONCILIATION
Year ended 31 March ($Millions)

20252026

Net profit after tax (‘NPAT’)

($269.8)$574.3

Less: Associates equity accounted earnings

($493.7)($442.2)

Plus: Associates proportionate EBITDAF

$179.4$279.1

Less: Minority share of subsidiary EBITDAF

($138.2)($131.8)

Less: Income received fair value assets through OCI

-($45.7)

Plus: Acquisition/sale-related transaction costs

$7.6$12.8

Plus: One-off restructuring costs

$7.6$3.5

Net loss/(gain) on foreign exchange and derivatives

$39.4($16.9)

Net realisations, revaluations and impairments

$107.3$99.3

Discontinued operations

($0.2)($280.2)

Underlying earnings

($560.6)$52.2

Plus: Depreciation & amortisation

$602.0$580.4

Plus: Net interest

$401.4$453.3

Plus: Tax

$46.3($138.9)

Plus: International Portfolio Incentive fee

$346.9($21.2)

Proportionate EBITDAF

$836.0$925.8

less: Discontinued operations($9.3)($6.5)

Proportionate EBITDAF (continuing operations)

$826.7$919.3

Commentary

•Proportionate EBITDAF is an unaudited non-GAAP (‘Generally

Accepted Accounting Principles’) measure of financial performance,

presented to provide additional insight into management’s view of

the underlying business performance.

•Proportionate EBITDAF is shown from continuing operations and

includes corporate and management costs, however, excludes

incentive fees, transaction costs and contributions from businesses

sold, or held for sale.

•Specifically, in the context of operating businesses, Proportionate

EBITDAF provides a metric that can be used to report on the

operations of the business (as distinct from investing and other

valuation movements).

39

Commentary
•Loan to value (LTV) calculation = adjusted net debt / fair value of

portfolio

•LTV approach consistent with S&P approach to assessing Infratil’s

stressed leverage under the Alternative Investment Funds methodology

•Fair value of portfolio represent Infratil’s proportionate share of an

asset's independent valuation, market value, or book value

•Net debt is corporate net debt (financial debt obligations of Infratil

Limited and Infratil Finance Limited) adjusted for:

–Infratil’s proportionate share of Letter of Credits issued by portfolio

companies with recourse to shareholders

–Unconditional Fortysouth divestment proceeds receivable at 31

March 2026

•Liquidity available includes:

–undrawn corporate bank facilities

–corporate cash

–unconditional Fortysouth divestment proceeds

•Weighted average cost of drawn debt of 5.20% and a weighted average

tenor of debt of 2.7 years

Notes: (1) Drawn debt excluding Perpetual IFTHAs, including drawn Acquisition Facilities.

31 March ($Millions)20252026

Net bank debt$544.8$1,602.6

Infrastructure bonds$1,411.1$1,370.0

Perpetual bonds$231.9$231.9

Total net debt drawn$2,187.8$3,204.5

Adjustments:

Recourse Letters of Credit issued$150.9$161.0

Fortysouth proceeds-($217.0)

Adjusted net debt$2,338.7$3,148.5

Fair value of portfolio$18,303.7$20,407.0

Loan to value12.8%15.4%

Liquidity available (adjusted)$1,437.5 $1,108.5

40

DEBT & LIQUIDITY

31 March 2026Gearing
1

Net Debt / EBITDA

2

% of drawn debt

hedged

3

CDC

4

24.2%9.493%

One NZ30.6%2.974%

Kao Data26.8%n/a99%

Longroad Energy

5

14.3%n/a92%

Galileo

6

n/a n/a n/a

Gurīn Energy

7

n/a n/a n/a

Mint Renewables

8

n/a n/a n/a

RHCNZ Medical Imaging28.1%4.172%

Qscan Group23.2%3.163%

Anytime Radiology8.8%n/an/a

Wellington Airport33.7%6.079%

Value Weighted Average of

Portfolio Companies

9

24.2%85%

Notes:

1.Gearing calculated as total net debt / total capital based on most recent independent valuations, listed equity value or book value at 31 March 2026

2.Unless otherwise stated EBITDA definitions based on pre IFRS16 and allowable pro forma adjustments under financing arrangements for each Portfolio Company rounded to one decimal place

3.Calculated as floating rate drawn debt plus active ‘pay fixed’ interest rate swaps / total drawn debt as at 31 March 2026

4.CDC leverage metric applies March 2026 run rate EBITDA annualised, consistent with Moody’s calculation

5.Longroad gearing calculation reflects holding company Net Debt position and excludes non-recourse project financing, % of drawn debt hedged is based on non-recourse term debt but excludes construction and working capital facilities

6. 7. 8. Holding company Net Debt position, excludes non-recourse project finance borrowing

9. Calculated based on IFT’s value weighted, proportionate share of Total Net Debt /Total Capital and % of drawn debt hedged across all portfolio companies excluding Fortysouth

Commentary

•Gearing and credit metrics are monitored both at a portfolio level

and within individual portfolio companies.

•In addition to these metrics, CDC’s Australian business was assigned

a Baa2 (Stable) investment grade rating by Moody’s on 21 April 2026,

reflecting its strong financial position and disciplined growth

strategy. Wellington Airport maintains a BBB credit rating from S&P

with a stable outlook.

•EBITDAF-based leverage metrics are not considered appropriate for

Longroad Energy and Kao Data, given their industry segments and

current operating models.

•Interest rate exposure is monitored at each portfolio company and

managed within approved treasury policy limits.

•Hedging: 85% of drawn debt was hedged on a fixed-rate basis as at

31 March 2026 (89% at 31 March 2025).

PORTFOLIO COMPANY DEBT

41

---

ANNUAL
REPORT

2026

INVESTING

WISELY IN IDEAS

THAT MATTER

Contents
Financial overview 1

Report of the Chair 2

Report of the Chief Executive 5

Management model 11

Sustainability 14

Portfolio 16

Financial performance 33

Corporate governance 97

Directory 114

At Longroad Energy’s solar farms, sustainability extends beyond clean

power generation. A wildlife and habitat assessment is conducted for

each renewable energy project to formulate strategies to reduce wildlife

risk and identify measures to enhance ecological services.

This approach reflects Infratil’s purpose of investing wisely in ideas that

matter, where progress is measured not only by short term outputs, but

also by the enduring value created for communities and the natural

world alike.

In Arizona, Longroad Energy voluntarily funded research supporting the

relocation of Western Burrowing Owls into desert areas near solar farms.

This involved partnering with a conservation group, Wild at Heart, to

create artificial burrows where adult owls are now raising young owls

due to this innovative approach.

The initiative achieves a thoughtful balance between energy generation

infrastructure and ecological benefits for a declining wildlife species in

the desert. It is a considered intervention, grounded in long-term

thinking and respect for place.

Further afield, Longroad Energy supports research into agrivoltaics

(solar agriculture integration) and participates in collaborative studies

through the Renewable Energy Wildlife Institute, to advance research

into “managed ecosystems” and enhance wildlife at energy sites.

Disclaimer

This Annual Report has been prepared by Infratil Limited (NZ company number 597366, NZX:IFT; ASX:IFT). To the maximum extent permitted by law, Infratil Limited, its affiliates

and each of their respective affiliates, related bodies corporate, directors, officers, partners, employees and agents will not be liable (whether in tort (including negligence) or

otherwise) to you or any other person in relation to this Annual Report. It contains summary information about Infratil Limited and its activities which is current as at the date of

this report.

This report should be read in conjunction with Infratil Limited’s FY26 Results Investor Presentation, market releases and other periodic and continuous disclosure

announcements, which are available at www.nzx.com, www.asx.com.au or infratil.com/for-investors/. This report is for information purposes only and is not financial, legal, tax,

investment or other advice or a recommendation to acquire Infratil Limited securities and has been prepared without taking into account the objectives, financial situation or

needs of prospective investors. This report may contain certain “forward-looking statements” about Infratil Limited and the environment in which it operates, such as indications

of, and guidance on, future earnings, financial position and performance. Forward-looking information is inherently uncertain and subject to contingencies outside of Infratil

Limited’s control, and it gives no representation, warranty or assurance that actual outcomes or performance will not materially differ from the forward-looking statements.

ContentsInfratil Annual Report

Contents
Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

Financial OverviewInfratil Annual Report

FY26 OVERVIEW

A STRONG TRACK RECORD: 18% TSR SINCE INCEPTION IN 1994

02004006008001,200 1,000

NZ$m

FY22

FY25

FY24

FY23

FY26

5001,0001,5002,0002,5003,0000

NZ$m

5,00010,00015,00020,00025,0000

NZ$m

FY22

FY25

FY24

FY23

FY26

FY22

FY25

FY24

FY23

FY26

17.5018.0018.5019.0019.5020.0020.5021.0021.5017.00

CPS

FY22

FY25

FY24

FY23

FY26

PROPORTIONATE OPERATIONAL EBITDAF

1

02004006008001,200 1,000

NZ$m

FY22

FY25

FY24

FY23

FY26

5001,0001,5002,0002,5003,0000

NZ$m

5,00010,00015,00020,00025,0000

NZ$m

FY22

FY25

FY24

FY23

FY26

FY22

FY25

FY24

FY23

FY26

17.5018.0018.5019.0019.5020.0020.5021.0021.5017.00

CPS

FY22

FY25

FY24

FY23

FY26

PROPORTIONATE CAPITAL EXPENDITURE

2

02004006008001,200 1,000

NZ$m

FY22

FY25

FY24

FY23

FY26

5001,0001,5002,0002,5003,0000

NZ$m

5,00010,00015,00020,00025,0000

NZ$m

FY22

FY25

FY24

FY23

FY26

FY22

FY25

FY24

FY23

FY26

17.5018.0018.5019.0019.5020.0020.5021.0021.5017.00

CPS

FY22

FY25

FY24

FY23

FY26

TOTAL ASSET VALUE

02004006008001,200 1,000

NZ$m

FY22

FY25

FY24

FY23

FY26

5001,0001,5002,0002,5003,0000

NZ$m

5,00010,00015,00020,00025,0000

NZ$m

FY22

FY25

FY24

FY23

FY26

FY22

FY25

FY24

FY23

FY26

17.50

18.0018.5019.0019.5020.0020.5021.0021.5017.00

CPS

FY22

FY25

FY24

FY23

FY26

DIVIDEND

$989 M

Proportionate Operational EBITDAF

1

11%

$2.7 B

Proportionate Capital Expenditure

2

17%

$20.6 B

Total Asset Value

13%

$16.26 per share

Net Asset Value (post fees)

5%

20.9 cents per share

Dividend Declared

2%

94/100

GRESB

3

Sustainability Score

9%

1

1. EBITDAF is an unaudited non-GAAP measure of consolidated net earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, amortisation, financial derivative movements, impairments, revaluations, and gains or losses on the sale of investments. EBITDAF also excludes acquisition

and sale-related transaction costs, management incentive fees, and one-off project costs. EBITDAF does not have a standardised meaning and should not be viewed in isolation, nor considered a substitute for measures reported in accordance with NZ IFRS, as it

may not be comparable to similar financial information presented by other entities. Proportionate Operational EBITDAF represents Infratil’s share of EBITDAF from its investee companies, excluding Contact Energy. It also excludes corporate costs and early-stage,

non-capitalised Development Spend incurred by Infratil’s early-stage renewables businesses. A reconciliation of net profit after tax to Proportionate EBITDAF is provided in the FY26 Annual Results Presentation.

2. Proportionate Capital Expenditure is Infratil’s share of the capital expenditure of all portfolio companies held during the year, excluding listed company Contact Energy.

3. The Global Real Estate Sustainability Benchmark (GRESB).

REPORT OF THE
BOARD CHAIR

United States 13%Europe 5%Asia 3%Australia 47%New Zealand 32%

49.7%

Infratil Share

99.8%

54.7%

42.0%

56.8%

14.1%

95.0%

38.0%

73.0%

On behalf of your Board, I’m pleased to

report a total shareholder return of 13.9%

and proportionate operational EBITDAF

growth of 11% for FY26.

Kia ora koutou,

Infratil began in New Zealand 31 years ago and our cornerstone goal is

to deliver shareholders 11 to 15% returns, after fees and taxes, over a

10-year period. Our performance against this measure is 17.3% from

FY17 to FY26.

For FY26, from 1 April 2025 to 31 March 2026, we delivered a return of

13.9% based on share price growth and assuming dividends were

reinvested. While our share price performance during FY26 was positive,

it continued to be affected by global market noise. This included market

concerns about financial returns on AI investment and the Middle East

conflict. Even so, our conviction in our growth opportunities is stronger

than ever.

Longroad Energy emerged from the regulatory uncertainty

overshadowing United States renewable investment a year ago, with a

positive outcome on tax incentives and a market backdrop of growing

electricity demand. Similarly, CDC is expanding its data centre footprint

in Australasia as fast as it can to meet the unprecedented demand for

computing capacity. Its 5 May 2026 announcement of a massive

555 megawatts (MW) contract propelled Infratil’s share price to an

all-time high above $15.

Infratil is more than a single asset and the geographic and multi-sector

diversity of our portfolio again provided added strength. We grew

proportionate operational EBITDAF across the portfolio by 11% to

NZ$989 million in FY26, despite our New Zealand businesses

continuing to be constrained by weakness in the domestic economy.

This year-on-year EBITDAF growth was very positive given we also sold

some businesses during the year.

Infratil’s ongoing growth enabled us to confirm a dividend payout of

20.9 cents per share, unimputed. This was up from 20.5 cents per share

in FY25.

1

23

1

2

5

3

2

1

1

4

3

4

1

2

3

4

1

2

3

4

5

1

Contents

Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

Report of the ChairInfratil Annual Report

Total shareholder return (TSR) is the

overall gain from an investment over

time, including share price increases and

dividends. It assumes any dividends are

reinvested.

PeriodInfratil TSR

1 year13.9%

5 years13.1%

10 years17.3%

Since inception17.9%

Returns calculated to 31 March 2026

Share priceNZ$

31 March 202510.38

31 March 202611.65

Cumulative Annual Return (%)

FY16FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

-100%

0%

100%

200%

300%

400%

500%

600%

Infratil TSR NZX 50ASX 200

TOTAL SHAREHOLDER RETURN – 10 YEARS

66.0%

59.4%

3

1

59.5%

2

Anytime Radiology

2

MARKET PERSPECTIVES ON VALUE
Infratil’s returns compare favourably against our target 11-15% range,

as well as the NZX 50 and ASX 200, over multiple timeframes as shown

to the left.

Another measure that we follow closely is our calculated net asset

value (NAV) per share, after fees, which grew from $15.48 to $16.26

over the year. The NAV represents the estimated value of our underlying

investment portfolio, plus cash and other assets, less net debt and other

liabilities. It is typically calculated using independent or market based

valuation methods for our portfolio companies.

We recognise that market views on value can differ for reasons such as

interest rate movements, market sentiment and different perspectives

on asset valuations. This means, for example, that the share price can

lag our NAV per share where Infratil’s valuations incorporate growth that

is longer dated than equity markets are willing to value.

Infratil’s share price discount to NAV widened to about 25% across

FY25 and FY26. Market sentiment was a significant driver of this

discount. At the end of FY25, we experienced the noise of potential

changes to American renewable energy policy and uncertainty about

data centre demand following the release of the Deep Seek AI model.

Positive outcomes through the first half of FY26 were then eroded when

AI bubble concerns resurfaced and the Middle East conflict drove

broader uncertainty.

Pleasingly, CDC’s massive contract announcement in May 2026 has

seen the share price discount to NAV reduce to about 10% at recent

$15 levels.

We’ll keep working to reduce this market discount to our NAV by helping

our portfolio companies to realise their growth opportunities and by

communicating our insights on future value to the market. If there is a

material sustained discount to NAV, the Board does also have the option

of implementing share buybacks of up to 20 million shares annually. This

would need to be weighed up against growth opportunities requiring

capital in the near term.

A SHARPENED STRATEGIC FOCUS

Infratil’s strength is our ability to evolve, spot thematic opportunities, and

to act decisively with exceptional management teams. It is what sets us

apart and has enabled our long-term success. As part of our continued

Contents

Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

Report of the ChairInfratil Annual Report

Balance Infratil’s cash flow and dividends

Identify and scale our growth platforms

beyond CDC and Longroad Energy

Continue to broaden our shareholder base

and support future scale

Divest businesses unlikely to scale under

our ownership and reinvest

INFRATIL TSR COMPARISON

INFRATIL NET ASSET VALUE (NAV) PER SHARE

16

14

12

20

18

10

8

6

4

2

0

NZ$

31 Mar 2430 Sep 2431 Mar 2530 Sep 2531 Mar 26

Infratil NAV per shareInfratil share price

18%

16%

14%

12%

10%

8%

6%

4%

2%

1 year

Infratil

5 years10 years20 years

NZX 50

Our target is an 11-15% return over 10 years

ASX 200

0%

evolution, and increasing size, we sharpened the clarity provided to

investors about our strategic priorities. This entailed setting four

medium-term objectives for investors to track. Jason Boyes, Infratil’s

CEO, provides more detail on the progress made against these

measures in his following report.

We articulated these strategic priorities for several reasons. First,

Infratil’s growing scale and maturity brings new challenges and

opportunities. This increases the need for discipline in how we allocate

shareholder capital. The market volatility through FY26 has been a good

reminder of the need to be agile and to continually look ahead.

As we’ve said before, the best strategy in the face of uncertainty is to

back quality. That quality comes from high-performing assets, strong

management, and sectors underpinned by enduring demand.

Portfolio strategy has been a key area of focus for the Board as we look

ahead to the type and scale of assets needed to drive continuing

out-performance and growth. We’re concentrating our efforts on

thematics with the greatest potential to create long-term value.

That has meant a shift to refining our portfolio, improving operating

performance, and ensuring that every investment supports our

strategic direction.

1. Infratil’s Net Asset Value (NAV) is the total value of its investments, based on

independent valuations, book values or market prices, less Infratil’s total net

debt and an estimate of management and incentive fees. Fees are calculated

assuming that Infratil’s share price grows at the bottom end of its target return

range of 11–15%, and that incentive fees on international assets reflect the

mid-point rate of growth. These fees are discounted over a five-year period.

3

Second, we believe transparency of what we’re focused on helps build
confidence in our long-term strategy. In addition to publishing our

strategic priorities, we’ve implemented various initiatives to improve

our disclosure and help investors better understand our business.

These have included:

• continued evolution of our reporting materials with an emphasis

on clarity and simplicity

• developing renewables valuation modelling to assist understanding

of Longroad Energy’s business

• publication of a simple fees model to explain the key components

of the Morrison fees.

We’re also formalising key elements of our investment approach — the

Infratil Way — that are critical to sustaining future performance as we

scale. This includes codifying our approach and processes for portfolio

company board performance assessments, remuneration reviews and

sustainability practices.

Work is underway to embed these principles and unlock synergies

through greater collaboration between portfolio companies – where

it makes sense to do so. Newer businesses can benefit from the

experience of more mature ones, and that’s vital as we grow.

OUR RELATIONSHIP WITH MORRISON

The day-to-day management of Infratil is delegated by your Board

to Morrison. This means the people working for Infratil are Morrison

employees, but we retain oversight and make key decisions on the

strategic direction of the business.

Our relationship with Morrison enables Infratil to draw on the global

expertise that Morrison is growing across multiple infrastructure

sectors. That growth supports Infratil and Morrison’s wider clients and

investment funds. This global exposure is becoming increasingly

important for Infratil as we seek larger and new sector investment

opportunities.

As Morrison’s largest client, we are well positioned. Infratil management

sees all ideas being germinated at Morrison and the Infratil Board sees

relevant opportunities. This means we aren’t limited for choice. The

challenge is more about balancing opportunities with our current

priorities and the returns we are seeking.

One of the Board’s key roles is to monitor the performance of Morrison.

The Board has been working to ensure there is an evolving mix of

qualitative and quantitative measures that align with Infratil’s growth

and drive strong performance from Morrison. We believe shareholders

do get good value under our agreements with Morrison and there is a

healthy tension in our relationship. This tension is reflected in our review

of costs allocated to Infratil in recent years and the evolution of our

management agreement.

While Morrison is paid management fees annually, incentive fees can

only be earned on non-New Zealand assets for out-performance above

a 12% hurdle for asset valuation growth. If incentive fees are earned, as

they were in FY25, they are paid over three years and there is a clawback

mechanism if the asset valuations reduce below the initial qualifying

amount. During the year, the Board chose to pay $80 million of

Morrison’s existing incentive fees in Infratil shares. This was considered

better value for shareholders than a cash payment and increases

Morrison’s alignment with Infratil’s shareholders in an ownership sense.

In FY26, the incentive fee hurdle wasn’t achieved and Morrison didn’t

qualify for a new incentive fee. Instead, a negative $18 million amount

will be carried forward into the FY27 fee calculation and netted off future

positive fees.

1

This shows the model is working.

BOARD EVOLUTION

I’m proud to chair a high-functioning and well-balanced Infratil Board.

We have strong capabilities and skills around the board table, and we

constantly challenge ourselves to ensure we’re making the best

decisions on behalf of shareholders.

Board succession is a focus as several of us are approaching generally

accepted time limits for service. Our goal through director succession is

to ensure that we replace the core skills of retiring directors and maintain

a strong, diverse, board culture.

Peter Springford has confirmed that he will retire from the Board at

the end of his current term at the Annual Meeting in August. We’re in

the process of recruiting a director to join before he retires. For my

part, having reached 12 years of tenure, I have said that I expect to

retire from the Board at the Annual Meeting in 2028. We’ll ensure a

smooth transition and will update investors in due course.

Contents

Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

Report of the ChairInfratil Annual Report

LOOKING AHEAD

Infratil’s strength, as always, lies in our commitment to active

management, strategic clarity, and long-term value creation. S&P

Global Ratings recognised the strength, quality and resilience of our

business and track record with an inaugural BBB+ credit rating.

I believe we are well positioned with the current vintage of Infratil assets

the strongest yet. We have enviable exposure to very strong demand

drivers across the renewable and digital sectors, and this year’s results

show CDC and Longroad Energy beginning to deliver meaningful

returns.

These may be uncertain times, but they are also exciting times for

ideas that matter.

Thank you for your continued support.

Nga mihi nui,

Alison Gerry

Chair

1. See page 35 of Infratil’s FY26 Annual Results Presentation for more detail.

4

Contents
Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

Report of the Chief ExecutiveInfratil Annual Report

REPORT OF THE

CHIEF EXECUTIVE

Dear Investors,

How quickly things change. When initially thinking about the themes

for this letter in April, FY26 hadn’t exactly been the steadier year we’d

hoped for. After navigating the market noise of the prior year, we

made good progress in the first half with strong updates from Longroad

Energy and CDC. However, we then saw negative AI sentiment, along

with expectations of longer dated growth and rising rates, drive the

share price lower. With a large weighting of our portfolio in data

centres, market views on AI have become a meaningful driver of

Infratil’s share price.

Sentiment shifted our way again late in the last quarter as the Middle

East conflict encouraged investors to seek defensive stocks and global

hyperscalers announced capital expenditure plans totalling about

US$650 billion of AI-related investment. In February, we also

experienced the ‘SaaS-pocalypse’, as investors worried about AI’s

effect on tech businesses.

Given this volatile market backdrop, we’re very pleased to have

delivered a 13.9% total shareholder return for the year.

CDC MOVES THE GROWTH NEEDLE, MASSIVELY

Just five weeks on from year-end and the ups and downs of FY26 have

been swept aside by CDC’s announcement of Australasia’s largest ever

data centre contract. At our institutional investor event in Sydney in

September 2025, CDC’s founder and CEO Greg Boorer had talked

about an impending tsunami of demand. Massive, mega, super-sized,

and monster, were some of the superlatives used by media and analysts

to describe the 555MW deal.

The market responded positively to the announcement and Infratil’s

share price lifted to over $15 for the first time ever, equating to an

approximately 30% gain in this brief period. This demonstrates the point

in Chair Alison Gerry’s letter that equity markets can take time to

recognise longer dated growth. In March, our independent valuation for

CDC included forecasts for expected demand. There should be some

further uplift in the next valuation for the crystallisation of that demand

into an actual contract and the acceleration of the future demand it

represents.

With CDC making up about 40% of our portfolio, this kind of market

reaction has an amplified effect. That can go both ways, and we do

get asked when we will sell CDC given the potential concentration risk.

As I said last year, we’re comfortable with its position today.

Half of CDC’s valuation is relatively low risk, comprising lengthy leases

to some of the world’s most creditworthy companies. The rest is growth,

and we monitor the growth prospects of data centres around the world.

While there is a lot of AI hype that needs to be screened out, it is clear

we are in the midst, arguably still near the beginning, of one of the

largest technological developments and infrastructure build outs we’re

likely to see in our lifetimes.

We’re lucky enough to have a front row seat and the recent contract

announcement puts us well ahead of the investment case that

underpinned our decision in early 2025 to lift our CDC shareholding to

49.7%. For a long time, we’ve wondered if CDC should expand offshore

to capture some of the oversized growth we see there, from arguably

less capable businesses. Instead, we’re now seeing oversized overseas

demand coming to Australasia, where we are strongest and feel well

positioned to continue to win.

66%

23%

6%

5%

$8,933m

$3,387m

$865m

$192m

$1,395m

$2,389m

$590m

$616m

$114m

$1,071m

$257m

$553m

$45m

Anytime

Radiology

TOTAL ASSET VALUE NZ$20.6 BILLION AT 31 MARCH 2026

1

1. Based on a combination of independent valuation, market and book values. Chart excludes Fortysouth following its subsequent sale.

Healthcare Infrastructure

Airport

Digital Infrastructure

Renewable Energy

5

MORE THAN JUST A DATA CENTRE BUSINESS
We don’t see Infratil becoming all data centres. Just over half our net

asset value comes from businesses spanning renewable energy, telco

networks, medical imaging and an airport. Happily, the growth of data

centres and their need for electricity is providing a tailwind for some of

our renewable energy development businesses, along with

longstanding decarbonisation drivers. The Middle East conflict has also

helped turn sentiment back towards renewable energy.

We’re very positive about Longroad Energy’s outlook in the United

States. While regulatory changes drove negative sentiment about the

prospects for renewable energy in the United States at the start of FY26,

all the previous regulatory support mechanisms for solar investment

remain in place until 2030, and even longer for batteries. This has been

positive for well capitalised operators, like Longroad Energy, that have

been very effective in qualifying their projects early. At the same time,

strong power demand and prices have offset higher delivery costs. This

has maintained their attractive development returns.

Renewables development outside the United States has been more

difficult. Power demand and prices haven’t risen as much to offset

higher project delivery and platform costs, as the complexity and time

of developments has increased in many of the markets we’re active in.

This has seen returns compress.

Consequently, in Europe we’ve seen the value attributed to earlier stage

projects fall dramatically. This is largely why Galileo’s valuation has

reduced in FY26, along with some longer dated projects being written

down or off. Although the amounts are relatively small for Infratil, this is

obviously not what we hoped for our investment. We’re working closely

with Galileo to reset the business for future growth. It will now focus on

fewer nearer term projects in a smaller number of markets.

Gurīn Energy is active in a number of Asian markets with significant

renewable energy development potential. Some of these markets

have also seen development returns reduce and Gurīn is managing

its prioritisation of markets and opportunities carefully. Last year, for

example, I said we were particularly focused on Gurīn’s large-scale,

Singapore-focused solar and battery energy storage project based in

Indonesia. It is one of a small number of Indonesian projects that the

Singapore Government has supported by issuing a conditional import

licence.

PROPORTIONATE CAPEX

PROPORTIONATE EBITDAF

1

ASSET VALUE

Contact EnergyKao DataCDC

One NZ

Wellington Airport

HealthcareSold

Corporate

Other renewables

Contents

Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

Report of the Chief ExecutiveInfratil Annual Report

It still requires Indonesian Government approval and while Government-

to-Government discussions appear to be progressing, they are taking

longer than we’d hoped. We’re confident the project can play a key role

in supporting Singapore’s energy needs and create significant benefits

for Indonesia. However, some of our investment to date could be lost if

approvals aren’t received.

This is the nature of the renewable energy development business. It has

always been exposed to regulatory changes and market dynamics. We

have platforms and projects in multiple jurisdictions, to take advantage

of where regulatory and economic settings are positive. Or, to minimise

our downside where they are not.

As the charts above show, Longroad Energy has invested heavily in

recent years as it builds out its generating capacity. Investment in the

development pipeline for our other renewables businesses has been

much smaller. Longroad Energy’s investment is beginning to deliver a

meaningful uplift in EBITDAF, while our other renewables businesses

are still at an early development stage and are yet to deliver positive

earnings growth.

6

Longroad Energy

FY24

FY25

FY26

050010001500200025003000

NZ$m

0500010000150002000025000

FY24

NZ$m

FY25

FY26

FY24

NZ$m

FY25

FY26

-200020040060080010001200

FY24

FY25

FY26

050010001500200025003000

NZ$m

0500010000150002000025000

FY24

NZ$m

FY25

FY26

FY24

NZ$m

FY25

FY26

-200020040060080010001200

FY24

FY25

FY26

050010001500200025003000

NZ$m

0500010000150002000025000

FY24

NZ$m

FY25

FY26

FY24

NZ$m

FY25

FY26

-200020040060080010001200

1. The calculation of proportionate EBITDAF is outlined on page 1 of this report. The figures exclude the contribution of divested assets.

Contents
Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

Report of the Chief ExecutiveInfratil Annual Report

SOLID PROGRESS AGAINST OUR STRATEGIC

OBJECTIVES

As the Chair’s letter notes, we’ve been focused on a very clear set of

medium-term strategic objectives through the year. These objectives

have guided a wide range of activity through FY26, and this activity has

delivered positive outcomes.

While we always make an investment decision with a view to holding an

asset for the long-term, one of our new strategic objectives in FY26 was

to divest businesses unlikely to scale under our ownership. This followed

a strategic review to consider the role of the various businesses within

the ‘pillars’ of our portfolio, and Infratil’s scale if we achieve our target

returns and grow our market cap to NZ$20 billion by 2030.

The outcome of this review was a decision to refine the portfolio and

divest those businesses unlikely to scale, or deliver meaningful returns,

under our ownership. Our initial goal was a medium-term target of

$1 billion from divestments. As at 26 May 2026 we were over halfway to

this target with more than NZ$600 million in sale proceeds received,

including:

• $55 million for a legacy property asset

• $217 million for our 20% stake in Fortysouth

• $333 million for our 50% stake in RetireAustralia

While Fortysouth is a high-quality business, it was a relatively small

position in our portfolio and was no longer a fit with our need for scaled

businesses with high target returns. RetireAustralia had not grown as

we’d hoped because of construction cost inflation in its core markets,

and a slower than expected transition in the operating model toward

more care and development. While progress had been made, the

timeframe required for better returns meant it made more sense to

redeploy our capital to near term opportunities.

We recently commenced a sale process for digital imaging business

Qscan. It is performing well and its projected returns look attractive, but

it is also unlikely to achieve the scale needed in our evolving portfolio.

While our portfolio companies are continuing to invest in growth

opportunities, one of our strategic goals is to balance our operating

cash flows and dividends in the medium term. We made good progress

in FY26, as income from our portfolio companies began to increase.

This narrowed our operating cash flow deficit, after cash dividends, to

$90 million from $120 million in FY25.

Our core ‘pillar 1’ assets – One NZ and Wellington Airport – have a clear

role as cash flow generators, with optimisation of those businesses to

drive continued distributions. As the charts on page 8 show, both

businesses are well established, with EBITDAF above their capital

expenditure requirements.

This stands in contrast to CDC and Longroad Energy where we are

beginning to see significant investment begin to deliver an uplift in

EBITDAF. While both businesses are currently designated as ‘pillar 2’

mature growth assets, our expectation is that they will also become

significant cash flow generators and graduate into pillar 1.

Over time, this earnings growth should enable them to fund their own

investment and distributions to Infratil. CDC, for example, is forecasting

its EBITDAF to exceed A$1 billion in FY28. Once fully deployed by the

end of FY29, its 1 gigawatt of contracted capacity is expected to deliver

annualised EBITDAF of approximately A$2 billion.

One NZ’s free cash flow is increasing and its distributions to Infratil more

than doubled to approximately NZ$180 million in the year. Although this

is two years later than we hoped, it is a creditable performance given

the soft economic conditions in New Zealand and increased market

competition.

ATTRACTIVE GLOBAL THEMATICSINFRASTRUCTURE CHARACTERISTICS

IDEAS

THAT

MATTER

PORTFOLIO

CONSTRUCTION

APPROACH

PILLAR 1

Cashflow generators

Scaled business with

enough diversity for

stability

PILLAR 2

Mature growth platforms

Scaled business, more

concentrated to drive

returns

PILLAR 3

Future growth platforms

Multiple smaller businesses

that can scale to $1bn+

over 3-5 years

*

Divest businesses unlikely to scale under

our ownership and reinvest

Balance Infratil’s cash flow and dividends

* Subject to a sale process at 31 March 2026.

7

Report of the Chief ExecutiveInfratil Annual Report
CDC and Longroad Energy have accelerated strongly throughout the

year and have compelling growth ahead of them. However, all good

things must come to an end, and our growth engines when we began

30 years ago were quite different. That cycle will continue. Renewing

our growth engines for the future is a continuous, long-term activity.

Our ‘pillar 3’ assets are those smaller businesses that we are looking to

develop into $1 billion-plus businesses over three to five years. We’re

continually reviewing this part of the portfolio to determine whether

these businesses can grow to this kind of scale. As I’ve mentioned,

Gurīn Energy is an example of one of these businesses that could be on

the cusp of success. The size of its proposed Indonesia to Singapore

solar and battery storage project means that, if it proceeds, it will

become a large-scale business very quickly. This would provide further

balance to CDC’s current concentration in the portfolio.

We’re always scanning for new infrastructure businesses that we could

add to this part of the portfolio, or in other pillars. Our investment in

Clearvision Ventures, for example, helps us identify and engage with

technology changes that could impact our businesses’ activities.

Clearvision is investing in companies that can drive meaningful

disruptions in energy and infrastructure sustainability.

I mentioned in my letter last year that we were interested in automated

logistics. We completed a lot of work on this idea, and we’re still

interested because returns appear attractive. However, it feels early for

us to be confident we can achieve the scale we need in a timeframe

that’s relevant, while introducing more complexity to the portfolio.

These considerations are front of mind at a time when we are still

refining the portfolio and we already have strong growth opportunities

across our existing investments.

As Infratil grows and our portfolio businesses become more global,

we’re seeing more international investor interest. This will help diversify

our shareholder base, benefitting all investors over time by deepening

the pool of potential investors.

ONE NZ

CDC

WELLINGTON AIRPORT

LONGROAD ENERGY

700

600

500

400

300

200

100

0

FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

100

80

60

40

20

0

FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

1,400

800

1,0 00

1,200

600

400

200

0

NZ$m

NZ$m

NZ$m

NZ$m

FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

Proportionate capital expenditureProportionate EBITDAF

1,000

800

600

400

200

0

FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

Total capital invested Total realised proceeds Total unrealised proceeds

700

600

500

400

300

200

100

0

FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

100

80

60

40

20

0

FY22

FY23FY24FY25FY26

1,400

800

1,0 00

1,200

600

400

200

0

NZ$m

NZ$m

NZ$m

NZ$m

FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

Proportionate capital expenditureProportionate EBITDAF

1,000

800

600

400

200

0

FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

Total capital invested Total realised proceeds Total unrealised proceeds

700

600

500

400

300

200

100

0

FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

100

80

60

40

20

0

FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

1,400

800

1,0 00

1,200

600

400

200

0

NZ$m

NZ$m

NZ$m

NZ$m

FY22

FY23FY24FY25FY26

Proportionate capital expenditureProportionate EBITDAF

1,000

800

600

400

200

0

FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

Total capital invested Total realised proceeds Total unrealised proceeds

700

600

500

400

300

200

100

0

FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

100

80

60

40

20

0

FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

1,400

800

1,0 00

1,200

600

400

200

0

NZ$m

NZ$m

NZ$m

NZ$m

FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

Proportionate capital expenditureProportionate EBITDAF

1,000

800

600

400

200

0

FY22

FY23FY24FY25FY26

Total capital invested Total realised proceeds Total unrealised proceeds

Those dynamics, and lower market valuations for One NZ’s closest

market comparator, Spark, have in turn driven a reduction in One NZ’s

independent valuation. We and the One NZ team have a strong set of

initiatives underway to recover that value. As you can see on page 10,

we have a solid track record of revealing value in large, integrated

businesses like One NZ over the years. This has included spinning out

One NZ’s towers business and Manawa Energy’s renewable energy

development business, Tilt.

Our cash flow will also be helped by our inaugural issuer credit rating

from S&P Global Ratings. The BBB+ credit rating reflects Infratil’s stable

funding, underpinned by substantial permanent capital and a track

record of strong investment performance. The rating will enable us to

broaden our funding options, enhance borrowing terms and reduce

financing costs.

Identify and scale our growth platforms

beyond CDC and Longroad Energy

Continue to broaden our shareholder base

and support future scale

Contents

Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

We have a substantial investor relations programme that is raising

awareness of Infratil in Australia and beyond, while also continuing to

engage with our New Zealand investor base through direct and online

activity. Our inclusion in the S&P/ASX 200 from mid-2025 provided a

welcome boost to Australian investor interest, as well as from

international index and active investors. We’ve seen ASX trading

volumes grow significantly, and Australasian analyst coverage has

increased with about a dozen analysts now publishing research on

Infratil.

CDC’s success should encourage more Australian investors to consider

Infratil as an investment, although we have more work to do on helping

investors understand our model and that we’re more than just a data

centre business.

8

700

600

500

400

300

200

100

0

FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

100

80

60

40

20

0

FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

1,400

800

1,0 00

1,200

600

400

200

0

NZ$m

NZ$m

NZ$m

NZ$m

FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

Proportionate capital expenditureProportionate EBITDAF

1,000

800

600

400

200

0

FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

Total capital invested Total realised proceeds Total unrealised proceeds

OUTLOOK
As we look to FY27, I’m confident in both our portfolio and the

opportunities ahead.

A key strength of our model is the discipline with which we keep testing

what we own against what else is out there. As Will Smales, Morrison’s

Chief Investment Officer, told our institutional investor audience in

September 2025, we’d reviewed several hundred investment ideas in

the prior year alone. This constant comparison helps ensure we’re

allocating capital to the opportunities we believe will deliver the best

long-term returns. In a fast changing world, that discipline matters.

Artificial intelligence is clearly front of mind. Our focus is on sifting

through the noise to understand what really matters for our existing

investments. We’re in a good position to do that. We see demand and

customer behaviour first-hand at CDC, we see the implications for

energy demand through Longroad Energy, and we’re seeing practical

applications of AI scale in One NZ and in teleradiology.

Through all that work, today, our core investment themes haven’t

changed. We continue to see the strongest opportunities in data

centres and renewable energy. They can meet our target returns in a

way that turns up in the share price (that is, at scale) and that growth

can be supported by our internally generated cash flows.

The growth in demand for efficient AI infrastructure is striking and may

be the investment opportunity of a lifetime. While computing chip

supply is well understood as a constraint, energy availability, supply

chain and labour shortages are emerging in the United States in

particular.

Longroad and CDC are established, scaled platforms with the capability

and experience to help meet this demand. Longroad has already signed

one project to supply a data centre and is establishing a dedicated data

centre development team. CDC’s new large-scale contract has

demonstrated Australasia’s opportunity to attract global computing

capacity, supported by regional stability, competitive build costs and

access to renewable energy.

Report of the Chief ExecutiveInfratil Annual Report

We’re exploring more opportunities to bring power and data centre

expertise together — delivering integrated solutions for customers in

a way that is more efficient and at greater scale. These opportunities

would require further funding and that may come from our existing

portfolio. As we assess the growth outlook and scale opportunities

for our existing assets, there is the potential for another $1 billion+ of

divestments over the medium term.

Across the portfolio, the near-term outlook is exciting. CDC is on track

to meet its target of doubling FY25 earnings by FY27. Solar and battery

storage remain the lowest-cost sources of new generation in many

markets, and we’ve agreed to provide a further US$300 million of equity

to Longroad to accelerate its growth. Gurīn Energy has an important

year ahead, with clarity on Indonesia’s export licence a potentially

transformational moment.

While those markets remain the most attractive for renewable

development today, we’re continuing to position our other platforms,

so they are ready to benefit as conditions improve in other regions.

As always, there’s plenty to be done and we’ll continue to invest wisely

to create further shareholder value.

Nga mihi nui,


Jason Boyes

Chief Executive

Contents

Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

9

35.8% 5.7x9.6
16.5% 1.7x6.7

47.3% 3.3x9.4

17.4% 18.4x27.4

7.5% 1.1x0.7

15.4% 1.5x4.6

8.6% 1.3x4.8

44.4% 2.1x4.7

14.1% 1.8x5.3

9.9% 1.3x6.1

13.0% 1.8x10.1

N/M 1.0x0.3

14.4% 1.2x3.3

18.0% 6.6x31.3

0.1% 1.0x11.0

1.8% 1.1x3.4

8.4% 1.8x18.0

This page shows our track record of returns on investments that we held

or divested in FY26.

The first column shows our calculated Internal Rate of Return (IRR) on

each asset up to 31 March 2026. It is expressed as a percentage per

year return, based on the capital invested, cash flows, and the most

recent asset valuation.

The Money Multiple metric shows the total value generated by an

investment relative to the total capital invested. It does not consider the

duration of investment, which is shown in the third column. Manawa

Energy is our longest held investment at 31 years.

One of the reasons we have been able to achieve strong long-term

returns is our willingness to prioritise value over asset accumulation.

Where other owners may be unwilling to question the status quo, we’ll

embrace opportunities to reshape businesses where shareholder value

can be unlocked.

Notes:

1. Total capital invested is equal to the sum of all capital invested by Infratil into the

asset during the holding period, and consists of initial capital contributions,

shareholder loan contributions, capital calls, and acquisition of management

shares vesting under LTI schemes.

2. Total realised proceeds are equal to the sum of all distributions received by Infratil

during the holding period and consists of capital returns, shareholder loan interest

payments, shareholder loan principal payments, dividends, and subvention

payments.

3. Total unrealised proceeds are equal to the valuation of Infratil’s stake in each of

its assets.

4. A non-cash benefit equal to the value of Infratil’s share of Tilt on split from

Trustpower has been recognised in the total realised proceeds for Manawa Energy

to capture the value of the embedded option within Manawa.

5. A non-cash benefit equal to the value of Infratil's Anytime Radiology investment

has been recognised in Qscan and RHCNZ. This reflects the purchase of

teleradiology assets by Anytime Radiology and the value of the embedded

option within Qscan and RHCNZ.

6. As Contact Energy has been held for less than a year its IRR has been

de-annualised to reflect the shorter holding period.

Report of the Chief ExecutiveInfratil Annual Report

Total capital invested Total realised proceeds Total unrealised proceeds

Anytime Radiology

Infratil Infrastructure

Property

Contents

Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

8,0009,0007,0006,0005,0004,0003,0002,0001,0000NZ$m

INFRATIL TRACK RECORD

10

Investment

Duration

(years)IRR

Money

Multiple

Divested assets - FY26

OUR MANAGEMENT MODEL
Global reach to identify new ideas that matter,

with offices across North America, Europe,

Asia and Australasia

Ongoing search for potential new infrastructure

opportunities


Access to larger-scale opportunities through

co-investment by multiple clients


Infratil invested alongside other Morrison clients in

assets such as Longroad Energy and CDC


Aligned interests through management

contract and maintaining a strong global

investment track record

Alignment with shareholders through incentives for

out-performance, and with Morrison entities and

related individuals holding ~6.5% of Infratil shares

~NZ$57 billion

Assets under management supported by a team

of 200+ professionals

~NZ$20.6 billion

Infratil leverages wider Morrison staff to manage

its 13 portfolio companies

Morrison has been Infratil’s manager since our

inception in 1994. Over this time, Morrison has

grown from being a New Zealand focused

infrastructure investor to managing a global

platform across private and listed markets.

This includes NZ$20.6 billion in assets managed for Infratil, along with

other large scale institutional clients and unlisted infrastructure funds.

Morrison’s global capability and scale is becoming more important as

Infratil grows and looks to develop new, larger investment opportunities.

Infratil’s Board oversees the strategic direction of the company,

including capital management, capital structure, risk management and

approving all investments and divestments. The Board has delegated

management responsibilities of Infratil to Morrison, with specific goals

and objectives set to align management efforts with Infratil’s strategic

priorities.

This management model has helped Infratil deliver superior shareholder

outcomes by providing:

• scale and sector expertise beyond Infratil’s independent capacity

• growing global reach and access to investment opportunities

• the ability to co-invest with other Morrison clients in larger assets

• strong alignment through Morrison shareholdings in Infratil and

performance incentives.

Management modelInfratil Annual Report

Contents

Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

11

Contents
Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

Management modelInfratil Annual Report

Finance

Tax & IR

Oversee Morrison investment

and asset management activity

Infratil CEO & CFO

Portfolio

Strategy

Legal & Risk

Morrison portfolio management team for InfratilMorrison Global Investment &

Asset Management Committees

Committees

include Infratil CEO/CFO

Sustainability

AN ACTIVE MANAGER

Active asset management is fundamental

to the preservation of capital and our

delivery of strong investment returns.

We take a hands-on approach to driving long-term business

performance to create shareholder value. We do this by creating

teams around each asset that bring to bear Morrison’s operational

and industry expertise, including sector specialists, tax, legal,

sustainability and research teams.

Infratil portfolio companies

DigitalRenewablesHealthcareAirports

Monitor Morrison, portfolio, and

portfolio company performance

Oversee capital allocation to

deliver shareholder returns

Review and approve strategy

Infratil Board

Morrison Global Investment & Asset Management functions

• Provide financial, strategy & research, management and governance expertise

• Originate new investment ideas

• Work closely with portfolio company Boards and Management

• Supplemented by a bench of 20+ sector experts and operating partners

Active management to maintain portfolio growth through cycles

• Drive financial and operational performance of portfolio companies

• Assist portfolio companies with strategic growth and value creation

• Dynamically allocate capital from cash flow generators to best 15%+ IRR opportunities

• Identify new investment opportunities to optimise portfolio cash flow and growth pillars

• Manage balance of cash flow and growth pillars and overall portfolio diversification and complexity as assets evolve

12

Management fee Incentive fee
• only for non-NZ assets

• hurdle: 12% increase in asset value

• fee: 20% of the outperformance above

the

hurdle

Infratil’s relationship with Morrison is governed

by an investment management agreement

that outlines Morrison’s responsibilities, and

the fee arrangements for its services.

The Board continually monitors Morrison’s performance to ensure

it is delivering value for shareholders and positioning Infratil for

continued success.

Morrison receives an annual management fee, with the fee varying

depending on whether an asset is part of the New Zealand or

international portfolio. An incentive fee may be payable where a

company has more than half of its assets outside New Zealand and a

minimum performance hurdle of 12% growth in asset value is achieved.

A high-level fee summary is shown in the diagram and a more detailed

fee model is available at https://infratil.com/for-investors/investor-

days/.

The management agreement includes a modified high-water mark

for incentive fees. This means that, in most instances, incentive

fees are not paid on one category without the recovery of any

underperformance of other fee categories.

An increase in incentive fees paid in recent years has reflected the

strong outperformance of our investments in Longroad Energy and

CDC, as determined by independent asset valuations. Independent

valuers are usually appointed by the Infratil Board for a three-year term

and are required to provide auditable, objective and market-based

assessments of fair value.

Contents

Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

Management modelInfratil Annual Report

MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT

13

New Zealand portfolio fee

• calculated at varying rates on Infratil’s

company value (i.e. market capitalisation

+ book value of Australasian debt)

• FY26 fee equated to an average of ~0.88%

International portfolio fee

• calculated on 1.50% of acquisition cost

and Infratil’s debt for non-Australasian

companies

Annual fee

• applicable from fourth Infratil balance date

• calculated on qualifying assets’ valuation

growth from the prior year

• under-performance of individual assets is

netted off positive performance

Initial asset fee

• an asset is eligible on the third balance

date held by Infratil

• hurdle calculated on contributed capital

after being acquired

Realised asset fee

• calculated on gain from sale or other

realisation process

Single instalment

Single instalment

Paid in three annual

instalments and years 2-3

may be scaled down if the

fair value reduces from

the initial qualifying value

Contents
Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

SustainabilityInfratil Annual Report

OUR SUSTAINABILITY STRATEGY

Governance

Have robust business and governance

processes to understand, actively manage and

be accountable for the ESG issues that matter.

Leadership

Be transparent, collaborative and follow

credible ESG standards and frameworks,

and influence for positive outcomes over the

long term.

Define the ideas that matter and find the opportunities where

ESG is evident eg: energy transition and social licence

Build conviction – ESG screening using Infratil’s Exclusion PolicyBuild conviction – ESG due diligence to inform decisions

Identify the value - investment decision and onboarding

including ESG considerations and plans

For example, considering ESG as part of:

• Shareholder agreements

• Onboarding plans

• Setting expectations

• Portfolio company reporting.

Invest wisely – active management, including ESG risks and

opportunities

We encourage our companies to identify and manage their material

ESG issues. On an ongoing basis, we assess and engage on:

• climate and environmental risks and opportunities

• ESG governance (including policy oversight), and

• ESG matters relating to people, communities and supply chains.

Benchmarking and reporting on material ESG matters

Infratil produces its own ESG & climate reports and increasingly

so do its portfolio companies:

• all companies report emissions and complete GRESB

assessments

• Infratil targets 60% of its portfolio having SBTi targets by end

of FY28 and 100% by end of FY30: FY26 = 23%

• $2.4m proportionate community investment, including Infratil.

Climate and Nature

Catalyse a rapid and efficient transition to a

low-carbon, resilient future, while protecting

and restoring nature.

People

Support our people and communities to thrive

from an intellectual, physical, cultural and

economic perspective.

POST-INVESTMENT

Material ESG issues are integrated across the investment process.

PRE-INVESTMENT

Material ESG issues are considered prior to committing capital.

We believe investing wisely means taking a long-term view and meeting the expectations of customers, communities and capital providers. It also requires the development of infrastructure that is resilient, sustainable and

well governed and managed. As well as focusing on sustainability at an Infratil level, we work closely with our portfolio businesses to support their own sustainability efforts and deliver real world outcomes. Our activity is

focused across the four pillars of our sustainability strategy.

Ultimately, decisions grounded in responsible stewardship are part of creating long-term value and managing risk. That’s why we also integrate sustainability considerations through our investment process.

14

Contents
Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

SustainabilityInfratil Annual Report

SUSTAINABILITY IN ACTION

CDC DATA CENTRES

Not all data centres are created equal. CDC was born during Australia’s

‘Millennium Drought’, and this drove a focus on sustainability. Today,

CDC is a sector leader in this space. In FY26, CDC achieved Net Zero

emissions within its defined target boundary which includes scope 1,

scope 2 and defined scope 3 emissions (travel, waste and customer

electricity).

As part of achieving this in FY26, CDC and its customers volume-

matched all electricity used in its facilities with 100% renewable

electricity. CDC’s data centres are energy efficient supporting a range

of technologies including liquid-to-chip cooling systems which require

less energy for cooling than traditional methods. CDC also works with

grid operators to support grid stability and capacity by investing in the

development of electricity infrastructure, such as substations.

CDC is also a sector leader in water conservation. Unlike traditional data

centres that consume large volumes of water for cooling, CDC has

implemented a closed-loop liquid cooling system from day one across

all CDC-built facilities, resulting in near-zero ongoing water

consumption for primary cooling, whilst remaining energy efficient. This

means CDC does not consume up to billions of litres of water every

year when compared to traditional evaporative cooling methods. This

provides an advantage for CDC’s resilience and sustainability, as well

as a commercial and social licence advantage, helping expedite

consenting for new CDC sites in areas where water supply is limited.

GURĪN ENERGY

Gurīn Energy integrates sustainability across the full project lifecycle.

Environmental and social risks - such as biodiversity, Indigenous

Peoples, resettlement, land acquisition, community safety and

security, and physical climate exposure - are assessed from early

site screening through development and delivery.

Where projects proceed, impact assessments are aligned with

international frameworks including the Equator Principles 4 (EP4) and

the International Finance Corporation (IFC) Performance Standards

on Environmental and Social Sustainability. Risks are managed using

a hierarchy of management measures – avoid, minimise, mitigate –

and where residual impacts remain, compensate, offset or remedy.

For example, the environmental permit for the Zambales project in the

Philippines required replacement trees (50-100 times the number

Gurīn Energy removed) to be planted in a designated area.

Gurīn Energy maintains an environmental and social management

system aligned with the IFC Performance Standards, ILO conventions

and other relevant international frameworks. The system is integrated

into all business activities at every stage of project development,

construction and operation. These activities include land acquisition,

community engagement, labour management and contractor

practices. Expectations for employees, contractors and suppliers are

set by Gurīn Energy’s Code of Conduct, Human Rights Policy and

Supplier Code of Conduct.

MEASURING OUR PROGRESS

We measure and report our progress on the ESG issues that matter in

the Sustainability Reporting section of our website. Our key governance

documents, policies and Modern Slavery reporting are in the

Governance section of our website.

Our ESG performance is assessed by a range of external frameworks

shown in the table below. The ratings are used by our investors and

stakeholders in their capital allocation and engagement decisions, and

they support inclusion in ESG indices. Reflecting our progress, in May

2026, Infratil was included in the Dow Jones Best in Class Australia

Index for the first time.

Each year, our portfolio companies participate in the globally

recognised, independent GRESB Infrastructure assessment. Infratil’s

overall GRESB Fund score has continued to increase, with our 2025

management score ranking first globally, out of 135 peers. Wellington

Airport achieved a GRESB five-star rating and 98/100 score in their

sector, while One NZ scored 93/100 and ranked second in Oceania.

Rating bodyLatest ratingPrior ratingRating range

GRESB94860-100

MSCI ESGAAACCC to AAA

S&P CSA38230-100; industry

average 29

Sustainalytics

ESG Risk

6.68.50-10 = negligible risk;

40+ = severe risk

Forsyth Barr (NZ)

Climate & ESG

A-B+D to A+

CDPBCD to A

15

Contents
Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Our management model

Sustainability

Our portfolio

Financial Performance

Corporate governance

Directory

16

Report of the Chief ExecutiveInfratil Annual Report

Contents

Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

PortfolioInfratil Annual Report

ENABLING

IDEAS THAT

MATTER

16

CDC Data Centres (CDC) is a leading Australasian provider of data
centre infrastructure, with 25 operating and under construction

facilities across Canberra, Sydney, Melbourne, Perth and Auckland.

The business has built a strong track record of delivering large-scale,

future-ready and sustainable campuses for customers, with more than

90% of revenue derived from investment-grade rated counterparties

and a weighted average lease expiry of about 27 years, including

options. CDC is a trusted provider to Australian government agencies,

operating facilities designed to meet stringent federal security and

sovereignty requirements.

CDC continues to benefit from rising demand for secure, resilient,

high-quality data centre capacity, supported by the ongoing

densification of computing equipment, which enables greater

computing power within the same physical footprint. To meet this

demand, CDC is investing significantly in new capacity, with

construction progressing at its second Sydney and Melbourne

campuses. CDC recently celebrated the opening of its Brooklyn

campus in Melbourne and commenced construction of its first Perth

campus.

As its footprint has expanded, CDC has delivered strong earnings

growth, underpinned by long-term customer contracts, a high-quality

tenant base and favourable structural trends in digital infrastructure

demand. This saw its EBITDAF lift almost 20% in FY26, with growth

expected to accelerate further in FY27.

Construction at CDC’s Laverton

campus, Melbourne.

2016$8.9b49.7%35.8%

First investedValuation NZ$Infratil ownershipIRR

Contents

Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Digital

Renewables

Airports

Healthcare

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

Portfolio / Digital infrastructureCDCInfratil Annual Report

17

FY26 Developments

• Strong, growing demand with 220MW ICT capacity invoiced at

the end of FY26

• 671MW built operating capacity and 572MW under construction

at end of FY26

• Future build pipeline capacity of 1,663MW to FY34

• Densification is enabling CDC to deploy more capacity within

the same building envelope, extracting greater value from land,

building and infrastructure investments

CDC enters FY27 with strong momentum
following the award of a 555MW contract,

the largest data centre contract in

Australia’s history, in May 2026.

This took CDC’s total contracted capacity to more than 1GW and

materially improved medium-term earnings visibility. This new capacity

is scheduled to come online through FY28 and FY29, supporting

expectations that EBITDAF will exceed A$1 billion in FY28 and reach

approximately A$2 billion on an annualised basis when fully deployed.

Demand fundamentals for Australasian data centre space remain

compelling, driven by cloud, AI and increasing computing density.

Customers are seeking scalable, efficient and sustainable

infrastructure, with CDC’s demand-led, agile development model

helping manage execution and utilisation risk. It is a trusted provider to

Australian government agencies, operating facilities designed to meet

stringent federal security and sovereignty requirements.

Its competitive position is further strengthened by its in-house design

innovation expertise that enables the deployment of liquid cooling

technology for computing equipment and CDC’s industry-leading

closed loop cooling technology, which minimises water consumption to

near zero. This also enhances operational resilience and lowers risks for

customers because CDC builds data centres that are not reliant on

mains water availability for cooling.

With significant contracted demand, a differentiated product offering

and supportive long-term investors, CDC is well positioned to continue

scaling earnings and cash flow over the medium term. With CDC

Australia being assigned a public Baa2 (Stable) credit rating by Moody’s

Ratings in April 2026, CDC has the added ability to access global debt

and hybrid capital markets to help fund this growth.

Operating capacity 671MW

Under construction 572MW

Data Centres

Perth

Sydney

Melbourne

Canberra

Auckland

34MW

210MW

181MW

20MW

156MW

237MW

308MW

98MW

Contents

Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Digital

Renewables

Airports

Healthcare

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

Portfolio / Digital infrastructureCDCInfratil Annual Report

18

Key financials – 31 March A$m20262025

Revenue534446

EBITDAF393330

EBITDAF margin74%74%

Capital expenditure2,1131,760

Net Debt4,8813,499

Credit ratingBaa2 (stable)

Contents
Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Digital

Renewables

Airports

Healthcare

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

One NZ is a leading telecommunications provider in New Zealand,

offering mobile, broadband and enterprise connectivity services to

consumer, business and government customers. It operates a

nationwide mobile network serving about 2 million connections and

offers fixed line services through a combination of its own EonFibre

business and wholesale providers’ networks.

Infratil’s history with One NZ began in 2019, as part of a consortium

that purchased the business from Vodafone Group plc. This marked

Infratil’s first significant investment in telecommunications

infrastructure and services. In 2023, Infratil acquired control of the

rebranded One NZ.

Today, One NZ has a strong market position, underpinned by its brand,

distribution channels and customer base. Ongoing investments in 5G

and fibre are supporting revenue resilience and future growth, while the

business is focused on disciplined cost management and sustainable

cash generation.

One NZ performed well in mobile in FY26, maintaining its Pay Monthly

mobile share despite competitive pressure. This was supported by its

One Wallet and One NZ Satellite differentiation. Customers have also

embraced One Wallet as the way to upgrade to their next phone, with

most of One NZ’s interest free phone sales now going through the

scheme.

FY26 Developments

• Achieved 4% revenue growth in challenging, low growth market

• 5G network investment achieved 70% population coverage

• 2G and 3G networks shut down, enabling spectrum re-use

• One NZ Satellite capability expanded from messaging to include

data and voice calling via select apps on eligible phones

• EonFibre growing high-capacity demand as a standalone

network business

• FY26 free cash flow up $67m (vs FY25) with reduced investment

and working capital discipline

• ‘Medium Company of the Year Award’ in the Global Sustainability

Awards

Key financials – 31 March NZ$m20262025

Revenue1,9981,921

EBITDAF609605

EBITDAF margin30%31%

Capital expenditure246270

Net Debt1,4931,438

Image from One NZ’s multi-year

brand advertising campaign ‘Let’s Get

Connected’, voted New Zealand’s

favourite campaign of the summer.

2019$3.4b99.8%16.5%

First investedValuation NZ$Infratil ownershipIRR

Portfolio / Digital infrastructureOne NZInfratil Annual Report

19

Contents
Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Digital

Renewables

Airports

Healthcare

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

One NZ mobile Pay Monthly connections

have proved resilient in a highly competitive

market, underpinning steady revenue

growth. Innovative propositions, such as

One NZ Satellite and One Wallet, are

helping improve service options and

affordability, while reducing customer

churn.

The final switch-off of legacy 2G and 3G networks in March 2026

enables more efficient use of spectrum for 4G and 5G connectivity,

supporting improved speeds, coverage, and reliability. Ongoing

investment in mobile coverage has extended 5G coverage to 70% of

the population, along with upgrades to strengthen network resilience

and performance. At the same time, One NZ Satellite functionality has

expanded beyond messaging to include data and voice calling via

select apps on eligible phones, further strengthening coverage in

remote areas, with customers sending over 15 million messages

through space since launch in December 2024.

One NZ has continued to successfully transform itself into an ‘AI first,

human where it matters most’ organisation at the forefront of

innovation in the sector, working with global partners to embed AI

across the organisation. This year One NZ moved beyond feasibility

pilots which have helped drive adoption, to making strategic

investments – including upskilling employees – intended to scale AI

solutions to all parts of the telco value chain.

Portfolio / Digital infrastructureOne NZInfratil Annual Report

The recently opened

One New Zealand Stadium at

Te Kaha, in Christchurch.

20

With over 50 AI solutions live, One NZ is rewiring the organisation. It

is seeing improvements in delivering software, operational efficiency

through process automation, and customer experience improvements

through agentic support in the call centres. Better network

management has also been achieved with improved ability to spot

and respond to network anomalies.

One NZ’s “sector-leading, purpose-led sustainability” received

international recognition during the year when it won the ‘Medium

Company of the Year Award’ in the Global Sustainability Awards.

One NZ has continued to invest in infrastructure in ways to support

sustainability, including with reduced electricity usage through AI

driven network optimisation. Rooftop solar generation was installed

at a Christchurch data centre to support site operations and network

assets at the neighbouring One New Zealand Stadium.

Contents
Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Digital

Renewables

Airports

Healthcare

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

Portfolio / Digital infrastructureKao DataInfratil Annual Report

Kao Data continues to grow as a specialist developer and operator of

advanced, highly sustainable colocation data centres across the United

Kingdom. The business remains focused on hosting technically

demanding workloads, with a client base spanning high-performance

computing and AI, enterprise, and cloud providers.

Kao’s flagship asset is its 15-acre campus in Harlow, located within the

“Innovation Corridor” between London and Cambridge. The campus

has land, power and planning consent for four data centres, of which

two are currently operational and serving customers, with a third under

construction. During the period, Kao secured a 10-year agreement

with an international neocloud provider for a 22MW deployment at

Harlow, further evidencing strong demand for AI and high-density

computing capacity.

Kao continues to expand its development pipeline. In March 2026, the

business completed the acquisition of a 4.7-acre greenfield site at Park

Royal in West London. The site will be redeveloped into a new, highly

efficient and sustainable data centre, with a targeted ready-for-service

date of 2029. The project represents a strategic growth option,

providing near-term capacity and strengthening Kao’s presence in one

of Europe’s most sought-after data centre markets. As the site sits

within a prime West London availability zone, it is expected to be

attractive across all customer segments, including hyperscale.

Sustainability and energy resilience remain central to Kao’s strategy.

At Harlow, the business has entered into an agreement to procure up

to 40MW of solar power via a private wire arrangement, supporting

its pathway to net zero operations by 2030 while improving long-term

energy security and cost visibility.

FY26 Developments

• Operating capacity increased from 29MW to 37MW

• New contracts driving revenue growth

• Further 18MW under construction at Harlow campus

• Future build pipeline lifted to 106MW with addition of West

London sites

Key financials – 31 March £m20262025

Revenue4838

EBITDAF54

EBITDAF margin10%11%

Capital expenditure20273

Net Debt252110

Kao Data’s Harlow Campus, located

between London and Cambridge,

United Kingdom.

2021$865m54.7%15.4%

First investedValuation NZ$Infratil ownershipIRR

21

2016$2.4b42.5%47.3%
First investedValuation NZ$Infratil ownershipIRR

Longroad Energy develops, owns and operates utility-scale solar,

battery storage and wind projects across the United States. Its

operating capacity is increasing rapidly, supported by record underlying

demand for new electricity supply. This demand is driven by

electrification, data centre development, manufacturing onshoring

and decarbonisation.

Longroad generates revenue through long-term contracted

arrangements for electricity supply and generation or storage capacity

with utility, corporate and municipal counterparties. During the year,

434MW of new capacity entered operation, taking owned operating

capacity to 3.5GW, with another 2GW under construction at year end.

Longroad also advanced its development pipeline, qualifying more

projects for tax credits. This is expected to facilitate a higher

development cadence in the medium term.

The increasing scale of the operating portfolio is contributing to

stronger earnings, with EBITDAF up 170% in FY26.

FY26 Developments

• Serrano (Utah), a 434MW solar and battery storage project,

entered operation

• Operating owned capacity increased to 3.5GW

• 2GW of projects were under construction at year end, up from

1GW in FY25

• More than 6GW of solar and storage projects now tax

credit qualified

Key financials – 31 March US$m20262025

Revenue356222

EBITDAF12145

EBITDAF margin34%20%

Capital expenditure1,0871,485

Net Debt3,7953,270

The Sun Pond solar and battery

project in Arizona.

Contents

Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Digital

Renewables

Airports

Healthcare

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

Portfolio / Renewable infrastructureLongroad EnergyInfratil Annual Report

22

Operating 2,347MW 729MW 458MW
Under construction 1,665MW 210MW 100MW

Arizona

SolarBatteryWindTransmission

Texas

Arkansas

New Mexico

California

Utah

Minnesota

Maine

Contents

Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Digital

Renewables

Airports

Healthcare

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

533MW

723MW

121MW

400MW

67MW

1,093MW

729MW

306MW

111MW

85MW

75MW

50MW

100MW

522MW

98MW

282MW

31MW

184MW

Despite what some media headlines might

suggest, renewable energy is doing the

heavy lifting when it comes to meeting the

growth in United States’ electricity demand.

After years of modest growth in U.S. electricity consumption, the

American Clean Power Association projects demand to increase by

~30% to 50% by 2040. The U.S. Energy Information Administration

expects a record 86GW of new utility-scale generating capacity to

be added in 2026, with 93% of this coming from solar, battery storage

and wind.

Communities are benefitting, with the Sun Pond solar and storage

project recently beginning to deliver 111MW solar power and 85MW

battery storage for several not-for-profit power providers. The project

will generate enough electricity to power about 35,000 average

American homes. Sun Pond is projected to avoid over 145,000 metric

tons of CO₂ emissions annually, the equivalent of taking nearly 34,000

petrol-powered passenger cars off the road each year.

Sun Pond is part of the larger Longroad Sun Streams Complex, a

four-project complex totalling nearly 1.6GW of solar and storage

capacity located in Maricopa County, Arizona. The entire complex is

providing more than US$300 million in benefits to Arizona schools and

communities through its long-term leases with the Arizona State Land

Department and tax remittances.

Portfolio / Renewable infrastructureLongroad EnergyInfratil Annual Report

23

Data centres are an increasingly important source of incremental

electricity demand. Longroad’s 1,000 Mile project is being developed

to supply a Meta data centre, and the business is increasing its focus

on this segment. To create opportunities for co-located data centre

development, by Longroad or partners, Longroad has submitted

multiple applications to connect data centre loads to transmission

networks. These applications are at existing project sites for multi-

gigawatts of load.

Longroad is seeking to increase its future contracted revenues by

continuing to advance its development pipeline, including through

selective large-scale acquisitions. The time is right for well positioned

and well capitalised businesses in this sector to grow. Infratil has

agreed to provide an additional US$300 million of equity in FY27 to

help Longroad take up this opportunity and accelerate its growth.

Contents
Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Digital

Renewables

Airports

Healthcare

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

Portfolio / Renewable infrastructureContact EnergyInfratil Annual Report

2025$1.4b14.1%7.5%

First investedValuation NZ$Infratil ownershipIRR (nine months)

Contact Energy is a listed company within Infratil’s portfolio. One of

New Zealand’s largest energy generators and retailers, Contact has

over 650,000 customer connections across electricity, gas,

broadband and mobile plans.

Infratil held 14.1% of Contact shares at the end of FY26, after first

acquiring about 9.5% in July 2025, as part of the sale of Infratil’s 51%

stake in Manawa Energy. On 20 May 2026, Infratil announced it had

reduced its holding by 5% to support future growth opportunities across

its portfolio. Infratil remains confident in Contact and the sector’s

outlook.

Contact operates 11 power stations across New Zealand, using

geothermal, hydro and thermal energy. With 3–5TWh of new grid

demand expected in the next five years, its Contact31+ strategy will

see it invest in the infrastructure required to support a more renewable,

resilient and affordable energy future for New Zealand.

Contact’s merger of Manawa Energy’s assets, together with a full

period of generation at the new Te Huka 3 geothermal plant, helped

drive a lift in Contact’s half-year earnings announced in February 2026.

Renewable generation was 97% of total electricity generation in the

half-year and Contact plans to use funding from its $575 million equity

raise to advance various battery storage, solar farm and geothermal

projects.

Contact's geothermal steam turbine

power station at Tauhara, in Taupō,

New Zealand.

24

Contact HY26 Developments

• $500 million EBITDAF in the 6-months to 31 December 2025

• Manawa Energy acquisition added 1.3TWh via hydro generation and

PPA contracts

• >80% of identified Manawa acquisition cost synergies secured in the

first six months of ownership

• Te Huka 3 plant online, supporting higher geothermal generation

Gurīn Energy has established a pipeline of ~8GW of solar, wind and
energy storage projects across a number of Asian markets. It is taking

a disciplined approach, balancing growth with regulatory, market and

execution risk, while developing assets aligned to long term demand

fundamentals.

Its flagship development is the large utility-scale Vanda RE solar and

battery project to deliver power from Indonesia to Singapore. Gurīn

Energy has a 75% stake in the project.

In mid-March 2026, the Indonesian Government granted Vanda RE

a permit to generate, distribute and sell electricity. This coincided

with bilateral discussions between the Indonesian and Singaporean

governments aimed at finalising a framework for cross border

renewable energy trade and investment. This process is taking longer

than we’d hoped and an Indonesian export licence is a key approval

required before we can make a final investment decision.

Another key development is the 240MW/960MWh battery storage

project in Japan which has reached ready-to-build status, having

secured a grid connection and the requisite land.

In the meantime, Gurīn Energy’s Zambales Province solar project has

completed its first year of operations in the Philippines and another

39MW solar plant is under construction in Tarlac Province.

FY26 Developments

• 100% of private land secured for Vanda RE; received domestic

Indonesian electricity production licence

• 240MW/960MWh battery storage project in Japan reached

ready-to-build status

• Acquired South Korean ~300MW wind + solar pipeline in

October 2025

• Tarlac Province solar project (39MW) expected to be operational

Q3 FY27

• Advanced projects with associated data centre supply

opportunities in Malaysia

2021$553m95.0%44.4%

First investedValuation NZ$Infratil ownershipIRR

Operating capacity 75MW

In development 5,449MW 2,678MW 112MW

Philippines

Malaysia

SolarWindBattery

Japan

South Korea

Thailand

Indonesia

Singapore

Project Vanda

75MW

105MW

2,072MW

25MW

818MW

2,200MW

1,250MW

614MW

458MW

112MW

585MW

Contents

Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Digital

Renewables

Airports

Healthcare

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

Portfolio / Renewable infrastructureGurīn EnergyInfratil Annual Report

25

Mint Renewables was established in late 2022 to develop
renewable energy projects, including large scale solar and

energy storage, in Australia. Mint’s project pipeline is

early-stage with around 3GW of wind, solar and storage

opportunities across Australia and New Zealand.

In August 2025, Mint announced its entry into New Zealand,

through a strategic partnership with Ngāi Tahu Holdings.

Mint Aotearoa is targeting large-scale renewable energy

developments across Aotearoa, with an initial NZ$100 million

investment programme. It combines Mint’s technical

expertise and deep development experience in renewable

energy with Ngāi Tahu Holdings’ strong regional leadership

and relationships, rooted in Ngāi Tahu values and iwi

governance structures.

FY26 Developments

• Secured environmental approval for large-scale battery

energy storage system in Victoria, Australia

• Establishment of Mint Aotearoa (Mint Renewables, Ngai

Tahu Holdings JV) and commencement of development in

New Zealand market

• Progressed a number of Australian projects towards

lodgement of environmental approvals expected in FY27

First invested2022

Infratil ownership73.00%

Net asset value NZ$m45

Contents

Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Digital

Renewables

Airports

Healthcare

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

Portfolio / Renewable infrastructureGalileoInfratil Annual Report

2020

First invested

$257m

Valuation NZ$

38.0%

Infratil ownership

9.9%

IRR

Galileo is a European renewable energy development platform with a

pipeline exceeding 16GW across 10 markets, spanning solar, battery

storage, and offshore and onshore wind. To date, Galileo has focused

on originating and scaling a diversified, high-quality development

portfolio, leveraging its development capability and selected

partnerships.

Historically, value has been realised through project advancement,

preconstruction asset sales, and capital recycling as projects mature.

As European renewable energy markets have evolved, with returns

affected by higher delivery costs, Galileo has begun refining its strategy

toward a build-to-own model. This will see it focus on fewer markets

where power demand, power prices, connection conditions and

regulation allow pipeline deployment at attractive returns

The change in Galileo’s development approach seeks to follow the

evolution of some of Infratil’s other renewable energy investments,

where their markets have matured.

In the meantime, the softening values across early stage development

projects, together with write offs or write downs following the strategy

reset, meant Galileo’s independent valuation reduced during the year.

As the new strategy is implemented, we expect to see Galileo improve

portfolio quality, support long-term value creation and provide greater

exposure to contracted operating assets.

During the year, Galileo completed construction of its first solar farm in

Lombardy, Italy, and executed construction contracts for a further 5MW

project in Lombardy, with construction scheduled to commence in

mid-2026.

26

Contents
Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Digital

Renewables

Airports

Healthcare

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

Portfolio / AirportsWellington AirportInfratil Annual Report

Wellington Airport continued to demonstrate its resilience in a

challenging operating environment. Strong performance across the

international and commercial (non-aeronautical) businesses, together

with a continued focus on efficiencies, delivered increased EBITDAF

for the year.

This was achieved despite weak macroeconomic conditions and

ongoing domestic airline fleet availability issues, which resulted in

a decline in total passenger numbers from 5.3 million in FY25 to

5.1 million. Domestic passenger volumes fell by around 6%, partly

offset by a 4% increase in international passengers, supported by

expanded trans-Tasman services and stronger inbound demand.

Significant investment was made during the year, including upgrades

to runway safety, terminal enhancements, and the construction of a

new fire station. These investments position the airport for improved

connectivity and future growth. In particular, the runway safety

upgrade enables modern widebody aircraft to connect Wellington

directly to hubs in Asia.

Wellington Airport installed the

engineered materials arresting

system (EMAS) safety zones at each

end of the runway.

1998$1.07b66.0%17.4%

First investedValuation NZ$Infratil ownershipIRR

27

FY26 Developments

• EBITDAF increased 2% to $133 million

• Strong growth in international demand partly offset reduced

domestic passenger volumes

• $112 million invested in infrastructure improvements

• Runway upgrade enhances safety and enables long-haul flights

• New car park providing 800 additional spaces

• 98/100 score in the GRESB sustainability assessment

Contents
Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Digital

Renewables

Airports

Healthcare

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

Portfolio / AirportsWellington AirportInfratil Annual Report

Wellington Airport is well positioned for

sustainable long-term growth as a critical

gateway for the Wellington region and

New Zealand.

A highlight of the year was the completion of the Engineered Materials

Arresting System (EMAS) in March 2026. This technological upgrade

provides enhanced runway safety performance for aircraft operators

while adding to the capability of the runway. The installation of the

system achieved a 143 metre increase in landing distance and a

37 metre increase in take-off distance which can now be utilised by

operators. Combined with more fuel-efficient next-generation aircraft,

these enhancements create opportunities for new services and routes

to major hubs in Asia and North America.

International demand remains strong, with travel to and from Australia

and Fiji, and onward connections to Asia, showing robust growth.

Domestic aviation headwinds persisted throughout the year, with airline

fleet capacity constraints dampening demand. As these constraints

begin to ease, aviation fuel prices more than doubled during the final six

weeks of the financial year due to the latest Middle East conflict. This

has prompted domestic airlines to trim future flight schedules and is

likely to continue until there is a clear resolution to the conflict.

Commercial upgrades across the terminal included the opening of

Good Day, a new multi-level bar and café. Several specialty stores also

opened, and new tenancies were added to the investment property

portfolio. These initiatives have helped diversify and strengthen

Wellington Airport’s financial position ahead of what is likely to be

another challenging year for the aviation sector.

28

The new Good Day cafe, bar and

dining space in Wellington Airport’s

terminal.

Key financials – 31 March NZ$m20262025

Revenue181177

EBITDAF133130

EBITDAF margin74%74%

Capital expenditure112117

Net Debt826736

Credit ratingBBB (stable)BBB (stable)

Contents
Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Digital

Renewables

Airports

Healthcare

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

Portfolio / HealthcareRHCNZInfratil Annual Report

RHCNZ Medical Imaging is New Zealand’s

largest private diagnostic imaging provider,

comprising Pacific Radiology, Auckland

Radiology and Bay Radiology.

It operates a nationwide network of 66 clinics and offers a full range of

imaging services including X ray, ultrasound, CT, MRI and PET-CT scans.

These services play a critical role in early diagnosis and treatment

planning, supporting both public and private healthcare systems.

RHCNZ is increasingly positioned as a scaled and integrated healthcare

platform. Its growth is underpinned by strong structural tailwinds,

including an ageing population, rising prevalence of chronic disease,

increased utilisation of imaging services, and system-wide demand for

more efficient and accessible diagnostic solutions. The group benefits

from its national footprint, clinical reputation, and strong relationships

with referrers and funders, enabling it to deliver consistent, high-quality

care across regions.

In FY26, RHCNZ continued to strengthen its clinical capacity and

operational performance. The radiologist workforce increased during

the year, supporting higher scan volumes, with the group delivering

approximately 10,000 additional scans compared to FY25. Two new

flagship clinics were opened in Auckland and Dunedin during the year.

Both sites are equipped with state-of-the-art PET-CT scanners, while

the Auckland clinic also features the Southern Hemisphere’s most

advanced analogue SPECT-CT scanner.

RHCNZ is also targeting growth in under-served regions, with plans to

expand imaging services into Wānaka, Masterton, Palmerston North

and Rangiora to strengthen regional healthcare infrastructure and

improve access to high-quality diagnostics.

EBITDAF reduced due to a combination of cost inflation, heightened

competitive dynamics, and changes in service mix. The group is

actively managing these pressures through ongoing cost discipline,

pricing strategies, and operational efficiency initiatives.

Key financials – 31 March NZ$m20262025

Revenue373370

EBITDAF121126

EBITDAF margin32%34%

Capital expenditure4749

Net Debt425428

2021

First invested

$616m

Valuation NZ$

56.8%

Infratil ownership

8.6%

IRR

29

FY26 developments

• 1.02 million scans, up from 1.01 million in FY25

• Radiologist workforce increased by six to 170

• New clinics in Auckland and Dunedin delivering advanced

diagnostic imaging

• Increase in imaging machines, located across 66 standalone clinics

Anytime Radiology is a dedicated teleradiology platform
established in late 2025, formed by separating and

combining the respective teleradiology capabilities of the

RHCNZ and Qscan businesses to enhance the delivery,

reliability, and performance of diagnostic imaging services

across Australasia.

Formed in response to growing demand for high-quality,

around-the-clock reporting, the business focuses on

providing urgent after-hours and remote radiology services

to hospitals and healthcare providers. It operates a global

network of radiologists, enabling continuous coverage

through a distributed model with hubs in London, Sydney,

Auckland, and Christchurch. This network supports

approximately 57 acute hospitals across Australia and

New Zealand, providing scalable access to diagnostic

expertise regardless of location or time of day.

The platform offers a comprehensive range of services,

including 24/7 after-hours reporting, overflow capacity

support, and access to subspecialist expertise. Its operating

model ensures consistent turnaround times and integrates

seamlessly with hospital workflows, supported by a robust

technology and clinical governance framework that prioritises

accuracy, security, and reliability.

Anytime Radiology is expected to play an increasingly

important role in supporting healthcare systems facing

workforce constraints and growing imaging demand,

improving access to timely diagnosis and contributing to

better patient outcomes across the region.

First invested2025

Infratil ownership59.40%

Net asset value NZ$m114

Contents

Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Digital

Renewables

Airports

Healthcare

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

30

Portfolio / HealthcareQscanInfratil Annual Report

Qscan Group (Qscan) is one of Australia’s largest diagnostic imaging

providers and operates a national network of 80 clinics across

metropolitan and regional Australia. It delivers a full suite of imaging

services including X ray, ultrasound, CT, MRI and PET. The business is

recognised for clinical excellence and subspecialty expertise,

particularly in high value and complex imaging (CT, MRI, and PET).

Qscan is a strong performer, delivering double digit EBITDAF growth

despite sector-wide inflationary pressures. This growth has been

supported by increasing demand, pricing discipline, a focus on complex

modalities, and leveraging the business’ differentiated technology

platform as it scales.

In FY26, Qscan continued to expand its footprint and capability. This

included both organic expansion of existing clinics and the integration

of seven additional practices into the platform. The business is also

investing in advanced imaging modalities and digital tools. This includes

AI-assisted scanning and reporting to improve productivity and clinical

outcomes.

2026 developments

• Launch of advanced AI tools in both clerical and clinical domains,

improving productivity, quality of bookings, and clinical outcomes

• Divestment of teleradiology business to Anytime Radiology, enabling

stronger focus on core business growth and capabilities

• 1.50 million scans, up from 1.45 million in FY25, with strong growth in

complex modalities

• Radiologist headcount increased by 28 to 192

• 80 standalone clinics, up 6 from FY25

2020

First invested

$590m

Valuation NZ$

59.5%

Infratil ownership

14.1%

IRR

Anytime Radiology

Key financials – 31 March A$m20262025

Revenue354316

EBITDAF8777

EBITDAF margin24%24%

Capital expenditure2821

Net Debt250275

HOW INFRATIL ACCOUNTS FOR ITS INVESTMENTS
The front section of this Annual Report

describes the operational performance

and strategic progress of Infratil’s material

investments over the year.

This overview is provided to help readers navigate from that operational

commentary to the financial statements that follow.

Infratil’s portfolio includes investments with different ownership

structures, and the way each investment is reflected in the financial

statements depends on the level of control or influence Infratil has over

that business. As a result, different accounting treatments apply, which

affects how revenue, profits, assets and liabilities are presented.

Infratil prepares its financial statements using New Zealand accounting

standards (NZ IFRS) and reports in New Zealand dollars (NZD). The

accounts are prepared on a consolidated basis, meaning they present

Infratil together with the businesses it controls as a single group, rather

than as separate companies.

Because Infratil invests internationally, some portfolio companies

prepare their accounts in other currencies or under different

accounting standards (such as US GAAP). In these cases,

management translates the results back into NZD and adjusts them

so they are presented consistently under NZ IFRS.

Together, these factors mean that operational performance discussed

earlier in the report may be reflected differently in the financial

statements, depending on the ownership structure of each investment.

This overview explains how those connections are made and provides

context for understanding the financial results that follow.

Broadly, Infratil’s investments fall into three categories:

1. Subsidiary companies (where Infratil has control)

2. Associate companies (where Infratil has significant influence but

not control)

3. Investments measured at fair value (where Infratil has neither

significant influence or control)

Infratil generally seeks to invest in companies where it has control or

significant influence, allowing it to influence strategy and long term

value creation.

Contents

Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

31

PortfolioInfratil Annual Report

SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES – FULLY CONSOLIDATED

Where Infratil controls a business, it is treated as part of the Group.

How this appears in the financial statements

• All of the subsidiary’s revenue and costs are included line by line in

the Statement of Comprehensive Income (SOCI).

• All assets and liabilities are included line by line on the Balance Sheet.

• If there are other shareholders, their share is shown as a Non

Controlling Interest (NCI), with total profit split between Infratil

shareholders and minority shareholders at the bottom of the

primary statements.

What this means for readers

• The Group results show the full operating performance of the

business, not just Infratil’s share.

• Changes from year to year in revenue, profit and net assets are

more clearly visible.

ASSOCIATE COMPANIES – EQUITY ACCOUNTED

Where Infratil does not control a business but can still influence key

decisions, the investment is treated as an associate.

How this appears in the financial statements

• Infratil’s share of the associate’s net profit after tax (NPAT) is shown

as a single line in the SOCI.

• This includes all items at the associate level, such as financing costs,

tax and valuation movements.

• The Balance Sheet shows a single investment line, representing

Infratil’s net investment into the associate (original investment, annual

share of earnings and distributions).

• Dividends received reduce the value of the investment rather than

being shown as revenue.

What this means for readers

• The primary financial statements show limited detail about the

associate’s operations, such as revenue or expenses.

• More detail (including 100% revenue, NPAT and Other Comprehensive

Income (OCI)) is provided in note 6, Investments in associates.

INVESTMENTS MEASURED AT FAIR VALUE

Where Infratil has no control and no significant influence, the

investment is treated as a financial investment and measured at

fair value.

How this appears in the financial statements

• No operating revenue or profit from the investment is included

in NPAT.

• Changes in value are recorded in OCI rather than profit.

• The investment is shown on the Balance Sheet as a single line

at fair value, often based on a quoted market price.

• Dividends received are shown separately in the SOCI.

• Value changes are tracked in an OCI reserve, not in retained

earnings.

What this means for readers

• These investments do not contribute to operating profit, other

than dividends received.

• Performance is mainly reflected through changes in valuation,

rather than earnings.

Taken together, these accounting approaches mean that Infratil’s

financial results reflect both the performance of its infrastructure

investments and the level of ownership and control it has over each

business. Where Infratil controls or has significant influence over an

investment, results are reported based on the underlying accounting

performance of those businesses and do not generally reflect changes

in their fair value from year to year (unless the investment is impaired).

By contrast, investments measured at fair value reflect changes in

market valuation directly. As a result, book values in the financial

statements and underlying fair values may differ, and the notes provide

important additional context for understanding the Group’s overall

performance and value creation.

Contents
Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Our management model

Sustainability

Our portfolio

Financial Performance

Corporate governance

Directory

32

Report of the Chief ExecutiveInfratil Annual Report

Contents

Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Financial Performance

Corporate governance

Directory

Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report

32

CONNECTING

IDEAS THAT

MATTER

33
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report

Contents

Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

Notes

2026

$Millions

Restated

2025

$Millions

Operating revenue10 2,999.1 2,855.8

Dividends

45.8

-

Total revenue3,044.9 2,855.8

Share of earnings of associate companies6 442.2493.7

Total income3,487.13,349.5

Depreciation14, 16(409.9)(431.3)

Amortisation of intangibles18 (170.5)(170.7)

Employee benefits(706.4)(643.1)

Operating expenses12 (1,509.4)(1,780.0)

Total operating expenditure(2,796.2)(3,025.1)

Operating surplus before financing, derivatives, realisations

and impairments690.9324.4

Net gain/(loss) on foreign exchange and derivatives16.9 (39.4)

Net realisations, revaluations and impairments11(99.3)(107.3)

Interest income5.7 36.3

Interest expense(459.0)(437.7)

Net financing expense(453.3)(401.4)

Net surplus/(loss) before taxation155.2(223.7)

Taxation credit/(expense)13 138.9(46.3)

Net surplus/(loss) for the year from continuing operations294.1(270.0)

Net surplus/(loss) from discontinued operations after tax9 280.2 0.2

Net surplus/(loss) for the year574.3(269.8)

Net surplus/(loss) attributable to owners of the Company549.8(294.8)

Net surplus/(loss) attributable to non-controlling interests24.5 25.0

The accompanying notes form part of these consolidated financial statements.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

For the year ended 31 March 2026

Notes

2026

$Millions

Restated

2025

$Millions

Other comprehensive income, after tax

Items that will not be reclassified to profit and loss:

Fair value change of property, plant and equipment 15.4 229.6

Share of associates’ other comprehensive income(46.2)29.2

Fair value change of equity investments 61.8 (1.0)

Income tax effect of the above items(5.7)(37.4)

Items that may subsequently be reclassified to profit and loss:

Differences arising on translation of foreign operations350.176.7

Effective portion of changes in fair value of cash flow hedges147.0 (170.1)

Realisations on disposal of subsidiary, reclassified to profit and loss(674.6)(3.5)

Ineffective portion of hedges taken to profit and loss3.4 (1.4)

Income tax effect of the above items(44.9)51.4

Total other comprehensive income after tax(193.7)173.5

Total comprehensive income for the year380.6(96.3)

Total comprehensive income for the year attributable to:

Owners of the Company991.7(157.7)

Non-controlling interests(611.1)61.4

Earnings per share

Basic and diluted (cents per share) from continuing operations4 27.4(31.6)

Basic and diluted (cents per share) 4 55.8(31.5)

34
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report

Contents

Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

Notes

2026

$Millions

Restated

2025

$Millions

Cash and cash equivalents22.1 312.6 293.7

Trade and other accounts receivable and prepayments22.1 499.7 425.2

Electricity market security deposits - 26.2

Derivative financial instruments22.4 6.6 80.5

Inventories44.1 42.6

Income tax receivable23.1 0.2

Assets held for sale9 179.1 140.1

Current assets1,065.2 1,008.5

Trade and other accounts receivable and prepayments22.1 128.4 120.0

Property, plant and equipment14 3,144.6 5,047.3

Investment properties15 114.0 103.1

Right of use assets16.1 1,209.2 1,130.1

Derivative financial instruments22.4 54.3 93.2

Intangible assets18 734.1 811.9

Goodwill 17 4,726.5 4,682.0

Investments in associates6 4,971.23,592.7

Shareholder loans to associates6 291.7 245.7

Deferred tax asset13.3 117.2 -

Other investments7 1,619.1 198.0

Non-current assets17,110.316,024.0

Total assets18,175.517,032.5

The accompanying notes form part of these consolidated financial statements.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION

As at 31 March 2026

Notes

2026

$Millions

Restated

2025

$Millions

Accounts payable, accruals and other liabilities834.8 862.1

Interest bearing loans and borrowings19 397.0 105.4

Deferred payments for associates6 451.8-

Lease liabilities16.2 87.5 82.7

Derivative financial instruments22.4 14.1 132.4

Income tax payable4.9 17.7

Infratil Infrastructure bonds20 156.1 161.5

Wellington International Airport bonds21 100.0 70.0

Liabilities directly associated with the assets held for sale9 - 69.1

Current liabilities2,046.21,500.9

Interest bearing loans and borrowings19 3,860.5 3,082.2

Accounts payable, accruals and other liabilities268.2 381.9

Deferred payments for associates6 139.9-

Lease liabilities16.2 1,237.7 1,086.8

Deferred tax liability13.3 - 204.4

Derivative financial instruments22.4 13.6 234.7

Infratil Infrastructure bonds20 1,204.7 1,239.7

Perpetual Infratil Infrastructure bonds20 231.9 231.9

Manawa Energy bonds - 373.4

Wellington International Airport bonds and senior notes21 643.7 615.7

Non-current liabilities7,600.27,450.7

Attributable to owners of the Company7,677.26,527.2

Non-controlling interest in subsidiaries851.9 1,553.7

Total equity8,529.18,080.9

Total equity and liabilities18,175.517,032.5

Approved on behalf of the Board on 25 May 2026

Alison Gerry Anne Urlwin

Director Director

35
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report

Contents

Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

Notes

2026

$Millions

2025

$Millions

Cash flows from operating activities

Cash was provided from:

Receipts from customers3,112.7 3,305.6

Distributions received from associates1.6 7.2

Other dividends45.7 1.4

Interest received17.4 18.1

3,177.4 3,332.3

Cash was disbursed to:

Payments to suppliers and employees(2,486.2)(2,497.4)

Interest paid(445.3)(395.9)

Taxation paid(50.9)(52.6)

(2,982.4)(2,945.9)

Net cash inflow / (outflow) from operating activities25 195.0 386.4

Cash flows from investing activities

Cash was provided from:

Proceeds from sale of associates333.2 -

Capital returned from associates - 25.9

Proceeds of shareholder and management loans11.8 1.8

Proceeds from sale of subsidiaries (net of cash sold)179.2 -

Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment0.6 2.5

Proceeds from sale of investment property53.8 -

Proceeds from sale of investments - 9.1

Return of security deposits24.7 172.3

603.3 211.6

Cash was disbursed to:

Purchase of investments(707.4)(813.4)

Issue of shareholder loans(42.7)(7.6)

Lodgement of security deposits(15.8)(168.3)

Purchase of intangible assets(106.7)(140.0)

Purchase of other investments(303.6)(2.6)

Purchase of shares in subsidiaries, net of cash acquired(56.7)(10.0)

Purchase of property, plant and equipment(443.9)(458.3)

(1,676.8)(1,600.2)

Net cash inflow / (outflow) from investing activities(1,073.5)(1,388.6)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

For the year ended 31 March 2026

Notes

2026

$Millions

2025

$Millions

Cash flows from financing activities

Cash was provided from:

Proceeds from issue of shares - 1,258.8

Proceeds from issue of shares to non-controlling interests89.6 38.5

Bank borrowings2,592.8 2,034.2

Issue of bonds225.0 250.0

Lease incentives42.0 -

2,949.4 3,581.5

Cash was disbursed to:

Repayment of bank debt(1,445.9)(2,007.7)

Repayment of lease liabilities(91.3)(105.3)

Loan establishment costs(3.0)(32.1)

Repayment of bonds(211.3)(140.0)

Infrastructure bond issue expenses(1.6)(4.0)

Shares acquired from non-controlling shareholders in subsidiaries(108.7)(45.5)

Dividends paid to non-controlling shareholders in subsidiaries(56.9)(66.3)

Dividends paid to equity holders3 (138.4)(122.4)

(2,057.1)(2,523.3)

Net cash inflow / (outflow) from financing activities26892.3 1,058.2

Net increase / (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents13.8 56.0

Foreign exchange gains / (losses) on cash and cash equivalents9.6 1.5

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the year293.7 236.2

Cash balances on acquisition - -

Adjustment for cash disposed of on sale of subsidiary9(4.5) -

Cash and cash equivalents at end of the year312.6 293.7

The accompanying notes form part of these consolidated financial statements.

36
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report

Contents

Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

Capital

$Millions

Revaluation

reserve

$Millions

Foreign currency

translation reserve

$Millions


Other

reserves

$Millions


Retained

earnings

$Millions

Total attributable

to owners of the

Company

$Millions

Non-controlling

$Millions

Total

equity

$Millions

Balance as at 1 April 2025 (restated)3,409.2 763.0 150.7 32.5 2,171.8 6,527.2 1,553.7 8,080.9

Net surplus/(loss) for the year - - - - 549.8549.824.5 574.3

Other comprehensive income, after tax

Realisations on disposal of subsidiary, reclassified to profit and loss - - - - - - - -

Fair value change of property, plant & equipment - 9.7 - - - 9.7 - 9.7

Share of associates other comprehensive income - - - (46.2) - (46.2) - (46.2)

Fair value change of equity investments - - - 61.8 - 61.8 - 61.8

Differences arising on translation of foreign operations - - 352.7 - - 352.7 - 352.7

Effective portion of changes in fair value of cash flow hedges - - - 71.1 - 71.1 31.8 102.9

Items reclassified to profit and loss on disposal of subsidiaries(7.2) - - (0.7)0.7 (7.2)(667.4)(674.6)

Items reclassified to retained earnings on disposal of subsidiaries - (318.3) - - 318.3 - - -

Total other comprehensive income(7.2)(308.6)352.786.0 319.0 441.9(635.6)(193.7)

Total comprehensive income for the year(7.2)(308.6)352.786.0 868.8991.7(611.1)380.6

Contributions by and distributions to non-controlling interest

Distributions to outside equity interest in associates - - - - - - - -

Non-controlling interest arising on acquisition of subsidiary - - - - - - - -

Issue of shares to non-controlling interests - - - - - - 99.8 99.8

Issue/(acquisition) of shares held by outside equity interest - - - - (1.7)(1.7)(1.1)(2.8)

Total contributions by and distributions to non-controlling interest - - - - (1.7)(1.7)98.7 97.0

Contributions by and distributions to owners

Shares issued298.4 - - - - 298.4 - 298.4

Share buybacks - - - - - - (100.9)(100.9)

Shares issued under dividend reinvestment plan63.2 - - - - 63.2 - 63.2

Dividends to owners of the Company - - - - (201.6)(201.6)(88.5)(290.1)

Total contributions by and distributions to owners361.6 - - - (201.6)160.0 (189.4)(29.4)

Balance at 31 March 20263,763.6 454.4 503.4118.5 2,837.37,677.2851.9 8,529.1

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY

For the year ended 31 March 2026

The accompanying notes form part of these consolidated financial statements.

37
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report

Contents

Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

Capital

$Millions

Revaluation

reserve

$Millions

Restated

Foreign currency

translation reserve

$Millions


Other

reserves

$Millions

Restated

Retained

earnings

$Millions

Total attributable

to owners of the

Company

$Millions

Non-controlling

$Millions

Total

equity

$Millions

Balance as at 1 April 20242,043.9 660.4 71.7 78.0 2,786.7 5,640.7 1,548.4 7,189.1

Restatement - Note 1 - - (1.0) - (140.4)(141.4) - (141.4)

Total comprehensive income for the year

Net surplus for the year (restated) - - - - (294.8)(294.8)25.0 (269.8)

Other comprehensive income, after tax

Items reclassified to profit and loss on disposal of subsidiaries - - - - - - (3.5)(3.5)

Fair value change of property, plant and equipment - 102.6 - - - 102.6 89.6 192.2

Share of associates’ other comprehensive income - - - 29.2 - 29.2 - 29.2

Fair value change of equity investments - - - (1.0) - (1.0) - (1.0)

Differences arising on translation of foreign operations - - 80.0 - - 80.0 0.5 80.5

Effective portion of changes in fair value of cash flow hedges - - - (73.7) - (73.7)(50.2)(123.9)

Total other comprehensive income - 102.6 80.0 (45.5) - 137.1 36.4 173.5

Total comprehensive income for the year - 102.6 80.0 (45.5)(294.8)(157.7)61.4 (96.3)

Contributions by and distributions to non-controlling interest

Distributions to outside equity interest in associates - - - - (0.8)(0.8) - (0.8)

Non-controlling interest arising on acquisition of subsidiary - - - - - - - -

Issue of shares to non-controlling interests - - - - - - 19.6 19.6

Issue/(acquisition) of shares held by outside equity interest - - - - - - (10.0)(10.0)

Total contributions by and distributions to non-controlling interest - - - - (0.8)(0.8)9.6 8.8

Contributions by and distributions to owners

Shares issued1,308.7 - - - - 1,308.7 - 1,308.7

Share buybacks - - - - - - - -

Shares issued under dividend reinvestment plan56.6 - - - - 56.6 - 56.6

Dividends to owners of the Company - - - - (178.9)(178.9)(65.7)(244.6)

Total contributions by and distributions to owners1,365.3 - - - (178.9)1,186.4 (65.7)1,120.7

Balance at 31 March 20253,409.2 763.0 150.7 32.5 2,171.8 6,527.2 1,553.7 8,080.9

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY

For the year ended 31 March 2025

The accompanying notes form part of these consolidated financial statements.

38
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report

Contents

Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the year ended 31 March 2026

(1) ACCOUNTING POLICIES

(A) REPORTING ENTITY

Infratil Limited ('the Company') is a company domiciled in New Zealand and registered under the Companies

Act 1993. The Company is listed on the NZX Main Board ('NZX') and Australian Securities Exchange ('ASX'),

and is an FMC Reporting Entity in terms of Part 7 of the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013.

(B) BASIS OF PREPARATION

The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with New Zealand Generally

Accepted Accounting Principles (‘NZ GAAP’) and comply with New Zealand equivalents to International

Financial Reporting Standards ('NZ IFRS') and other applicable financial reporting standards as appropriate

for profit-oriented entities. The consolidated financial statements comprise the Company, its subsidiaries,

associates and investments held at fair value ('the Group'). The presentation currency used in the

preparation of these consolidated financial statements is New Zealand dollars and is presented in $Millions

unless otherwise stated. The principal accounting policies adopted in the preparation of these consolidated

financial statements are set out below. These policies have been consistently applied to all the periods

presented, unless otherwise stated. Comparative figures have been restated where appropriate to ensure

consistency with the current period.

The consolidated financial statements comprise statements of the following: comprehensive income;

financial position; changes in equity; cash flows; significant accounting policies; and the notes to those

statements. The consolidated financial statements are prepared on the basis of historical cost, except

certain property, plant and equipment which is valued in accordance with accounting policy (E), investment

property valued in accordance with accounting policy (F), financial derivatives valued in accordance with

accounting policy (L) and equity investments designated at fair value through other comprehensive income

(FVOCI) (S).

The Group owns and operates infrastructure businesses and investments in New Zealand, Australia, the

United States, Asia, United Kingdom and Europe. Below is the basis of preparation for its investments across

the portfolio.

.


2026

Holding

2025

Holding Nature of InvestmentPrincipal activity

New Zealand

One NZ Capital Limited (One NZ)99.8% 99.9% Subsidiary - NZ IFRS 10Telecommunications

Infratil Finance Limited100% 100% Subsidiary - NZ IFRS 10Group Financing

Infratil Infrastructure Property

Limited

100%100%Subsidiary - NZ IFRS 10Property

Mahi Tahi Towers Limited

(Fortysouth)

20.0% 20.0% Held for Sale - NZ IFRS 5*Mobile Towers

Manawa Energy Limited - 51.1% Subsidiary - NZ IFRS 10Renewable Energy

RHCNZ Group Limited56.8% 51.7% Subsidiary - NZ IFRS 10Diagnostic Imaging

Wellington International Airport

Limited

66.0% 66.0% Subsidiary - NZ IFRS 10Airport

Contact Energy Limited14.1% - Fair Value - NZ IFRS 9Renewable Energy

Australia

CDC Group Holdings Pty Ltd49.7%48.2%Associate - NZ IAS 28Data Centres

Mint Renewables Limited73.0%73.0% Subsidiary - NZ IFRS 10Renewable Energy

Qscan Group Holdings Newco Pty59.5%57.2% Subsidiary - NZ IFRS 10Diagnostic Imaging

RA (Holdings) 2014 Pty Limited

(RetireAustralia)

- 50.0% Associate - NZ IAS 28Retirement Living

Anytime Radiology Limited59.4%- Subsidiary - NZ IFRS 10Teleradiology

Asia

Gurīn Energy Pte. Limited95.0% 95.0% Subsidiary - NZ IFRS 10Renewable Energy

United States

Clearvision Ventures

(31 December year end)Fair Value - NZ IFRS 9Venture Capital

Longroad Energy Holdings, LLC

(31 December year end)42.0% 37.0% Associate - NZ IAS 28Renewable Energy

Europe

Galileo Green Energy, GmbH38.0%38.0%Associate - NZ IAS 28Renewable Energy

United Kingdom

Kao Data Limited54.7%54.0%Associate - NZ IAS 28Data Centres

* In the prior year, Fortysouth was equity-accounted for under NZ IAS 28.

39
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report

Contents

Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

(B) BASIS OF PREPARATION CONTINUED

Accounting estimates and judgements

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with NZ IFRS requires management to

make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the

consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting

period. Future outcomes could differ from those estimates. The principal areas of judgement in preparing

these consolidated financial statements are set out below.

Valuation of property, plant and equipment

Where property, plant and equipment is recorded at fair value, valuations can include an assessment of the

net present value of the future earnings of the assets, the depreciated replacement cost, and other

market-based information in accordance with asset valuation standards. The key inputs and assumptions

that are used in valuations, that require judgement, can include projections of future revenues, volumes,

operational and capital expenditure profiles, capacity, terminal values, the application of discount rates and

replacement values. Key inputs and assumptions are reassessed at each balance date to ensure there has

been no material change that may impact the valuation.

With respect to assets held at cost, judgements are made about whether costs incurred relate to bringing an

asset to its working condition for its intended use, and therefore are appropriate for capitalisation as part of

the cost of the asset. The determination of the appropriate life for a particular asset requires judgements

about, among other factors, the expected future economic benefits of the asset and the likelihood of

obsolescence.

Assessing whether an asset is impaired involves estimating the future cash flows that the asset is expected

to generate. This will, in turn, involve a number of assumptions, including the assessment of the key inputs

that impact the valuation.

Valuation of investments including Associates

Infratil completes an assessment of the carrying value of investments at least annually and considers

objective evidence for impairment on each investment, taking into account observable data on the

investment, the status or context of markets, its own view of fair value, and its long term investment

intentions. Infratil notes the following matters which are specifically considered in terms of objective

evidence of impairment of its investments, and whether there is a significant or prolonged decline from

cost, which should be recorded as an impairment, and taken to profit and loss: any known loss events that

have occurred since the initial recognition date of the investments, including its investment performance,

its long term investment horizon, specific initiatives which reflect the strategic or influential nature of its

existing investment position and internal valuations; and the state of markets. The assessment also requires

judgements about the expected future performance and cash flows of the investment.

Goodwill impairment testing

Judgement is applied in identifying cash-generating units (CGUs), including assessing the lowest level at

which cash inflows are largely independent and goodwill is monitored for internal management purposes.

Judgement is also applied in determining the appropriate methodology used to estimate recoverable

amount, defined as the higher of value in use (VIU) and fair value less costs of disposal (FVLCD), depending

on the characteristics of the CGU and available observable market information. Where VIU calculations are

used, judgement is required in forecasting future cash flows and selecting appropriate discount rates and

long-term growth assumptions. Where FVLCD is used, judgement is required in determining the price that

would be received from the sale of the CGU in an orderly transaction between market participants, including

the selection of market-based assumptions for cash flows, discount rates, and growth expectations.

40
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report

Contents

Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

(C) RESTATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS IN ASSOCIATES

Longroad Energy

Longroad Energy Holdings (LEH) has three share classes (A, B, and C). The Class A shares issued at inception

to Longroad Energy Partners were previously all classified as equity. LEH management subsequently

identified that a subset of these Class A shares should have been classified as financial liabilities in the LEH

financial statements prepared under NZ IFRS. The holder of this subset of shares has the right to put them

back to LEH at their fair value on the date when the right is exercised. Accordingly, these shares are treated

as a financial liability and are measured at the present value of the redemption price that LEH may need to

pay, which represents the fair value of this subset of shares. Any subsequent changes in carrying amount

arising from remeasurement of the redemption amount are recognised in profit or loss. This was identified as

part of a further review to translate accounting policies from US GAAP to NZ IFRS for the purpose of Infratil

applying equity accounting.

This correction has therefore impacted LEH's financial results under NZ IFRS and consequently the amount

recognised by Infratil through its share of LEH's profit or loss and has led to a restatement of prior years.

The restatement impacts the Share of Earnings of Associate Companies and differences arising on

translation of foreign operations within the Statement of Comprehensive Income, and the Investment in

Associates within the Statement of Financial Position. The adjustment to share of associates other

comprehensive income is unrelated to the restatement of the Class A share. The following tables summarise

the impacts on the Group's consolidated financial statements.

(i) Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income

For the period ended31 March 2025

Previously

reportedLongroad As restated

Share of earnings of associate companies505.0 (11.3)493.7

Taxation expense(49.1)2.8 (46.3)

Others(717.2)-(717.2)

Net surplus/(loss) for the period(261.3)(8.5)(269.8)

Share of associates other comprehensive income6.5 22.7 29.2

Differences arising on translation of foreign operations83.6 (6.9)76.7

Others67.6 -67.6

Total other comprehensive income after tax157.7 15.8 173.5

Total comprehensive income for the period(103.6)7.3 (96.3)

Earnings per share

Basic and diluted (cents per share) from continuing operations(30.6)(1.0)(31.6)

Basic and diluted (cents per share)(30.6)(0.9)(31.5)

(ii) Consolidated Statement of Financial Position

For the period ended31 March 2025

Previously

reportedLongroad As restated

Investments in associates3,803.1 (210.4)3,592.7

Others13,439.8 -13,439.8

Total assets17,242.9 (210.4)17,032.5

Deferred tax liability(280.7)76.3 (204.4)

Others(8,747.2)-(8,747.2)

Total liabilities(9,027.9)76.3 (8,951.6)

Foreign currency translation reserve(158.6)7.9 (150.7)

Other reserves(9.8)(22.7)(32.5)

Retained earnings(2,320.7)148.9 (2,171.8)

Other equity(5,725.9)-(5,725.9)

Total equity(8,215.0)134.1(8,080.9)

For the comparative period opening 1 April 2024

Previously

reportedLongroad As restated

Investments in associates2,519.3 (211.5)2,307.8

Others13,204.9 -13,204.9

Total assets15,724.2 (211.5)15,512.7

Deferred tax liability(324.6)70.1 (254.5)

Others(8,210.5)-(8,210.5)

Total liabilities(8,535.1)70.1 (8,465.0)

Foreign currency translation reserve(71.7)1.0 (70.7)

Other reserves(78.0)-(78.0)

Retained earnings(2,786.7)140.4 (2,646.3)

Other equity(4,252.7)-(4,252.7)

Total equity(7,189.1)141.4 (7,047.7)

41
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report

Contents

Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

(D) BASIS OF PREPARING CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Principles of consolidation

The consolidated financial statements are prepared by combining the financial statements of all the entities

that comprise the consolidated Group. A list of significant subsidiaries and associates is shown in Note 1.

Consistent accounting policies are employed in the preparation and presentation of the Group consolidated

financial statements.

(E) PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

Property, plant and equipment (‘PPE’) is recorded at cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment

losses, or at fair value less accumulated depreciation and impairment losses. PPE that is revalued, is revalued

to its fair value determined by an independent valuer or by management with reference to independent

experts, in accordance with NZ IAS 16 Property, Plant and Equipment. Where the assets are of a specialised

nature and do not have observable market values in their existing use, depreciated replacement cost is used

as the basis of the valuation. Depreciated replacement cost measures net current value as the most

efficient, lowest cost which would replace existing assets and offer the same amount of utility in their

present use. For non-specialised assets where there is no observable market an income-based approach is

used.

Depreciation is provided on a straight line basis and the major depreciation periods (in years) are:

Buildings and civil works2-120

Vehicles and plant and equipment1-40

Renewable generation12-200

Office and IT equipment2-5

Leasehold improvements4-40

Land not depreciated

Capital work in progress not depreciated until asset in use

Communication and network equipment1-35

(F) INVESTMENT PROPERTIES

Investment properties are property (either owned or leased) held to earn rental income. Investment

properties are measured at fair value with any change therein recognised in profit or loss. Property that

is being constructed for future use as investment property is measured at fair value and classified as

investment properties. Where a leased property is held to earn rental income, the right of use asset is

included within Investment properties.

(G) RECEIVABLES

Receivables are initially recognised at fair value and subsequently measured at amortised cost, less any

provision for expected credit losses. The Group applies the simplified approach to measuring expected

credit losses using a lifetime expected loss allowance for all trade receivables and contract assets. These

provisions take into account known commercial factors impacting specific customer accounts, as well as

the overall profile of the debtor portfolio. In assessing the provision, factors such as past collection history,

the age of receivable balances, the level of activity in customer accounts, as well as general macro-

economic trends, are also taken into account.

(H) INVESTMENTS IN ASSOCIATES

Associates are those entities in which the Group has significant influence, but not control, over the financial

and operating policies. Investments in associates are accounted for using the equity method. Under the

equity method, the investment in the associate is carried at cost plus the Group’s share of post-acquisition

changes in the net assets of the associate and any impairment losses. The Group's share of the associates’

post-acquisition profits or losses is recognised in profit or loss, and the Group’s share of post-acquisition

movements in reserves is recognised in other comprehensive income.

(I) GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Goodwill

The carrying value of goodwill is subject to an annual impairment test to ensure the carrying value does

not exceed the recoverable amount at balance date. For the purpose of impairment testing, goodwill is

allocated to the individual cash-generating units to which it relates. Any impairment losses are recognised

in the statement of comprehensive income. In determining the recoverable amount of goodwill, fair value

is assessed, including the use of valuation models to calculate the present value of expected future cash

flows of the cash-generating units, and where available with reference to listed prices.

Intangible assets

Intangible assets include software, customer contracts, radio spectrum licences, fibre capacity agreements

and brands.

Amortisation is calculated to write off the cost of intangible assets less their estimated residual values using

the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives, and is generally recognised in profit or loss.

The estimated useful lives for current and comparative periods are as follows:

Software3 - 7 years

Customer contracts1 - 10 years

Radio spectrum licences15 - 20 years

Fibre capacity agreements15 - 20 years

Indefeasible rights of use25 years

Amortisation methods, useful lives and residual values are reviewed at each reporting date and adjusted

if appropriate.

42
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report

Contents

Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

Brand names

Brand names that are acquired as part of a business combination are recognised separately from goodwill

and included in intangible assets. These assets are carried at their fair value at the date of acquisition less

impairment losses. Brand names are valued using the relief from royalty method. Brand names are

determined to have indefinite useful lives and therefore do not attract amortisation. Key factors taken into

account in concluding this was the ongoing strong recognition of the brands, and the absence of any legal,

technical or commercial factors indicating that a finite life would be more appropriate. However, some

brands have definite useful lives and are amortised accordingly to their estimated useful life.

The carrying value of a brand is subject to an annual impairment test (with goodwill) to ensure the carrying

value does not exceed the recoverable amount at balance date.

(J) ASSETS AND DISPOSAL GROUPS HELD FOR SALE

Assets and disposal groups classified as held for sale are measured at the lower of carrying amount or fair

value less costs to sell. Assets and disposal groups are classified as held for sale if their carrying amount will

be recovered through a sale transaction rather than through continuing use. This condition is regarded as

met only when the sale is highly probable and the asset (or disposal group) is available for immediate sale in

its present condition and the sale of the asset (or disposal group) is expected to be completed within one

year from the date of classification.

(K) TAXATION

Income tax comprises both current and deferred tax. Current tax is the expected tax payable on the taxable

income for the year, using tax rates enacted or substantively enacted at the balance date, and any

adjustment to tax payable in respect of previous years. Deferred tax is recognised in respect of the

differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the

carrying amounts used for taxation purposes.

The amount of deferred tax provided is based on the expected manner of realisation or settlement of the

carrying amount of assets and liabilities, using tax rates enacted or substantively enacted at the balance

sheet date. A deferred tax asset is recognised only to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profits

will be available against which the asset can be utilised, or there are deferred tax liabilities to offset it.

Preparation of the consolidated financial statements requires estimates of the amount of tax that will

ultimately be payable, the availability and recognition of losses to be carried forward and the amount of

foreign tax credits that will be received.

(L) DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

When appropriate, the Group enters into agreements to manage its interest rate, foreign exchange,

operating and investment risks.

In accordance with the Group's risk management policies, the Group does not hold or issue derivative

financial instruments for speculative purposes. However, certain derivatives do not qualify for hedge

accounting and are required to be accounted for at fair value through profit or loss. Derivative financial

instruments are recognised initially at fair value at the date they are entered into. Subsequent to initial

recognition, derivative financial instruments are stated at fair value at each balance sheet date. The resulting

gain or loss is recognised in the profit or loss immediately unless the derivative is designated effective as a

hedging instrument, in which event, recognition of any resultant gain or loss depends on the nature of

the hedging relationship. The Group identifies certain derivatives as hedges of highly probable forecast

transactions to the extent the hedge meets the hedge designation tests.

Hedge accounting

The Group designates certain hedging instruments as either cash flow hedges or hedges of net investments

in equity. At the inception of the hedge relationship the Group documents the relationship between the

hedging instrument and hedged item, along with its risk management objectives and its strategy for

undertaking various hedge transactions. Furthermore, at the inception of the hedge and on an on-going

basis, the Group documents whether the hedging instrument that is used in the hedging relationship is

highly effective in offsetting changes in fair values or cash flows of the hedged item.

The effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives that are designated and qualify as cash flow

hedges are recognised in other comprehensive income and presented in equity. The gain or loss relating to

the ineffective portion is recognised in profit or loss. The amounts presented in equity are recognised in profit

or loss in the periods when the hedged item is recognised in profit or loss.

Hedge accounting is discontinued when the Group revokes the hedging relationship, the hedging instrument

expires or is sold, terminated, or exercised, or no longer qualifies for hedge accounting. Any cumulative gain

or loss recognised in equity at that time remains in equity and is recognised when the forecast transaction is

ultimately recognised in profit or loss. When a forecast transaction is no longer expected to occur, the

cumulative gain or loss that was recognised in equity is recognised in profit or loss.

Foreign currency differences arising on the retranslation of a financial liability designated as a hedge of a net

investment in a foreign operation are recognised directly in equity, in the foreign currency translation reserve,

to the extent that the hedge is effective. To the extent that the hedge is ineffective, such differences are

recognised in profit or loss. When the hedged net investment is disposed of, the cumulative amount in equity

is transferred to profit or loss as an adjustment to the profit or loss on disposal.

(M) FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSACTIONS

Transactions in foreign currencies are translated to the respective functional currencies of Group entities

at exchange rates at the dates of the transactions. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign

currencies at the reporting date are translated to the functional currency at the exchange rate at that date.

The foreign currency gain or loss on monetary items is the difference between amortised cost in the

functional currency at the beginning of the period, adjusted for interest and payments during the period,

and the amortised cost in foreign currency translated at the exchange rate at the end of the period.

Non-monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies that are measured at fair value are

translated to the functional currency at the exchange rate at the date that the fair value was determined.

Foreign currency differences arising on translation are recognised in profit or loss, except for differences

arising on the translation of the net investment in a foreign operation.

Foreign operations

The assets and liabilities of foreign operations including goodwill and fair value adjustments arising on

acquisition, are translated to New Zealand dollars at exchange rates at the reporting date. The income

and expenses of foreign operations are translated to New Zealand dollars at the average rate for the

reporting period.

43
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report

Contents

Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

(N) IMPAIRMENT OF ASSETS

At each reporting date, the Group reviews the carrying amounts of its assets to determine whether there

is any indication that those assets have suffered an impairment loss. If any such indication exists, the

recoverable amount of the asset is estimated in order to determine the extent of the impairment loss (if any).

Where the asset does not generate cash flows that are independent from other assets, the Group estimates

the recoverable amount of the cash-generating unit to which the asset belongs. Goodwill, intangible assets

with indefinite useful lives and intangible assets not yet available for use are tested for impairment annually

and whenever there is an indication that the asset may be impaired.

(O) REVENUE RECOGNITION

Revenue is measured based on the consideration specified in a contract with a customer. A description of

the nature and timing of the various performance obligations in the Group’s contracts with customers and

when revenue is recognised is outlined at Note 10.

Interest revenues are recognised as accrued, taking into account the effective yield of the financial asset.

Revenue from services is recognised in the profit or loss over the period of service. Dividend income is

recognised when the right to receive the payment is established.

(P) BORROWINGS

Borrowings are recorded initially at fair value, net of transaction costs. Subsequent to initial recognition,

borrowings are measured at amortised cost with any difference between the initial recognised amount and

the redemption value being recognised in profit or loss over the period of the borrowing using the effective

interest rate. Bond and bank debt issue expenses, fees and other costs incurred in arranging finance are

capitalised and amortised over the term of the relevant debt instrument or debt facility.

(Q) DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

Classification as a discontinued operation occurs on disposal, or when the operation meets the criteria to

be classified as a non-current asset or disposal group held for sale (see paragraph (J)), and represents a

separate major line of business or geographical area of operations. When an operation is classified as a

discontinued operation, the comparative statement of comprehensive income is re-presented as if the

operation had been discontinued from the start of the comparative year.

(R) SEGMENT REPORTING

An operating segment is a component of the Group that engages in business activities from which it may

earn revenues and incur expenses, including revenues and expenses that relate to transactions with any

of the Group's other components. All operating segments' operating results are reviewed regularly by the

Group's Board of Directors to make decisions about resources to be allocated to the segment and assess

its performance, and for which discrete financial information is available.

The Group is organised into ten main business segments, Manawa Energy (sold during the period), Mint

Renewables, Wellington International Airport, Qscan Group, RHCNZ Medical Imaging, Anytime Radiology

Group, Gurīn Energy, One NZ, Associate Companies and Other. Other comprises investment activity not

included in the specific categories.

(S) EQUITY INVESTMENTS DESIGNATED AT FAIR VALUE THROUGH OTHER

COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (FVOCI)

Equity investments are those investments that meet the definition of equity instruments under NZ IFRS 9

and over which the Group does not have control or significant influence. Equity investments that are not held

for trading may be irrevocably designated at fair value through other comprehensive income (FVOCI) at

initial recognition.

Equity investments designated at FVOCI are measured at fair value at each reporting date. Changes in fair

value are recognised in other comprehensive income. Dividends received from these investments are

recognised in profit or loss when the Group’s right to receive payment is established. Amounts recognised in

other comprehensive income in respect of equity investments designated at FVOCI are not reclassified to

profit or loss on derecognition. Instead, the cumulative gain or loss is transferred directly within equity.

(T) COMMON CONTROL TRANSACTIONS

Business combinations and transfers of businesses between entities that are ultimately controlled by the

Group both before and after the transaction are considered common control transactions and are outside

the scope of NZ IFRS 3 Business Combinations. The Group accounts for such transactions in accordance

with NZ IAS 8, applying an approach that reflects the continuation of control rather than a change in

ownership.

The Group applies predecessor (book value) accounting to common control transactions in its consolidated

financial statements. The assets and liabilities transferred are recognised at their existing carrying amounts,

and no goodwill or fair value uplift is recognised. Comparative information is not restated, as the Group

already controls both parties to the transaction and there is no change in the consolidated economic

substance of the Group.

(U) NEW STANDARDS, AMENDMENTS AND PRONOUNCEMENTS NOT YET ADOPTED

BY THE GROUP

NZ IFRS 18 - Presentation and Disclosure in Financial Statements is effective for periods beginning on or

after 1 January 2027 and applies retrospectively. The new standard aims to provide greater consistency in

presentation of the income and cash flow statements, and more disaggregated information. This is expected

to result in significant changes to how the Group presents the income statement and what information will

need to be disclosed on management-defined performance measures.

(2) NATURE OF BUSINESS

The Group owns and operates infrastructure businesses and investments in New Zealand, Australia,

the United States, Asia, United Kingdom and Europe. The Company is a limited liability company

incorporated and domiciled in New Zealand. The address of its registered office is 5 Market Lane,

Wellington, New Zealand.

More information on the individual businesses is contained in Note 5 (Operating segments) and Note 6

(Investments in associates) including the relative contributions to total revenue and expenses of the Group.

44
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report

Contents

Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

(3) INFRATIL SHARES AND DIVIDENDS

Ordinary shares (fully paid)20262025

Total authorised and issued shares at the beginning of the year968,086,132 832,567,631

Movements during the year:

New shares issued25,347,575 130,322,236

New shares issued under dividend reinvestment plan5,878,763 5,196,265

Treasury stock reissued under dividend reinvestment plan - -

Share buyback - -

Total authorised and issued shares at the end of the year 999,312,470 968,086,132

The Group’s capital comprises share capital, reserves, retained earnings and non-controlling interests.

All fully paid ordinary shares carry the same voting rights and rank equally for dividends and distributions

of equity.

On 28 May 2025, Infratil issued 7.7 million new shares to Morrison to settle $80.0 million of incentive fees for

management services. On 20 October 2025, Infratil also issued 17.6 million new shares as part payment for

the acquisition of 48.9 million Contact Energy shares from TECT Holdings Limited.

From time to time, the Company may purchase its own shares on market where this is considered to be in

shareholders’ interests and permitted under applicable trading windows. Shares purchased may be held

as treasury stock, reissued under the Dividend Reinvestment Plan, or cancelled. During the year, the Group

issued 5,878,763 shares under the Dividend Reinvestment Plan. At 31 March 2026, the Group held

1,662,617 shares as treasury stock, unchanged from 31 March 2025.

Dividends paid on ordinary shares

2026

cents per

share

2025

cents per

share

2026

$Millions

2025

$Millions

Final dividend prior year

13.25 13.00 129.3 108.8

Interim dividend current year7.25 7.25 72.3 70.1

Dividends paid to owners of the Company20.50 20.25 201.6 178.9

(4) EARNINGS PER SHARE

2026

$Millions

Restated

2025

$Millions

Net surplus/(loss) from continuing operations attributable to

ordinary shareholders

269.6(295.0)

Basic and diluted earnings per share (cps) from continuing

operations

27.4(31.6)

Net surplus/(loss) attributable to ordinary shareholders

549.8(294.8)

Basic and diluted earnings per share (cps)

55.8(31.5)

Weighted average number of ordinary shares

Issued ordinary shares at 1 April

968.1 832.6

Effect of new shares issued

14.1 99.5

Effect of new shares issued under dividend reinvestment plan

3.4 3.2

Effect of Treasury stock reissued under dividend reinvestment plan

- -

Effect of shares bought back - -

Weighted average number of ordinary shares at end of year 985.6 935.3

(5) OPERATING SEGMENTS

Gurīn Energy, Manawa Energy and Mint Renewables are renewable generation investments, Wellington

International Airport is an airport investment, Qscan Group, RHCNZ Medical Imaging and Anytime Radiology

Group are diagnostic imaging investments, and One NZ is a digital infrastructure investment. Infratil accounts

for these companies as subsidiaries. Associates comprises Infratil's investments that are not consolidated for

financial reporting purposes including CDC Data Centres, Fortysouth, Galileo, Kao Data, Longroad Energy and

RetireAustralia. Further information on these investments is outlined in Note 6. During the period, Infratil

disposed of Manawa Energy and RetireAustralia as outlined in Note 9. All other segments and corporate

predominately includes the activities of the Parent Company. The group has no significant reliance on any

one customer. Inter-segment revenue primarily comprises dividends from portfolio companies to the Parent

Company.

The Group operates in two principal areas, New Zealand and Australia, as well as having investments in the

United States, the United Kingdom, Asia and Europe. The Group’s geographical segments are based on the

location of both customers and assets.

45
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report

Contents

Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

For the year ended 31 March 2026

Gurīn

Energy

Asia

$Millions

Manawa

Energy

New Zealand

$Millions

Mint

Renewables

Australia

$Millions

Wellington

International

Airport

New Zealand

$Millions

Qscan

Group

Australia

$Millions

RHCNZ

Medical

Imaging

New Zealand

$Millions

Anytime

Radiology

Group

Australia

$Millions

One NZ

New Zealand

$Millions

Associates

$Millions

All other

segments and

corporate

New Zealand

$Millions

Eliminations &

discontinued

operations

$Millions

Total

$Millions

Total revenue10.7 125.5 0.2 194.2 399.7 373.2 16.3 1,998.7 - 87.1 (160.7)3,044.9

Share of earnings of associate companies - - - - - - - - 442.2 - - 442.2

Inter-segment revenue - - - - - - - - - 55.5 (55.5) -

Total income10.7 125.5 0.2 194.2 399.7 373.2 16.3 1,998.7 442.2 142.6 (216.2)3,487.1

Depreciation(3.4)(5.6)(0.5)(34.9)(38.8)(32.3)(0.1)(299.9) - - 5.6 (409.9)

Amortisation of intangibles - (0.2) - - (0.7)(2.5)(0.1)(167.2) - - 0.2 (170.5)

Employee benefits(25.2)(12.9)(6.6)(17.2)(216.5)(184.7)(2.9)(254.6) - - 14.2 (706.4)

Operating expenses(17.7)(105.7)(14.0)(99.1)(99.0)(70.0)(20.3)(1,162.1) - (113.9)192.4 (1,509.4)

Total operating expenditure(46.3)(124.4)(21.1)(151.2)(355.0)(289.5)(23.4)(1,883.8) - (113.9)212.4 (2,796.2)

Operating surplus before financing, derivatives, realisations

and impairments(35.6)1.1 (20.9)43.0 44.7 83.7 (7.1)114.9 442.2 28.7 (3.8)690.9

Net gain/(loss) on foreign exchange and derivatives(0.4)23.1 - (0.6)(0.4)5.3 1.4 - - 18.1 (29.6)16.9

Net realisations, revaluations and impairments(0.2) - 0.3 6.6 52.9 31.2 - (4.0) - (109.5)(76.6)(99.3)

Interest income1.5 - 0.2 0.9 2.9 1.2 -(4.3) - 22.6 (19.3)5.7

Interest expense(6.8)(6.8) - (37.7)(37.4)(53.1)(1.1)(190.4) - (151.8)26.1 (459.0)

Net financing expense(5.3)(6.8)0.2 (36.8)(34.5)(51.9)(1.1)(194.7) - (129.2)6.8 (453.3)

Net surplus/(loss) before taxation(41.5)17.4 (20.4)12.2 62.7 68.3 (6.8)(83.8)442.2 (191.9)(103.2)155.2

Taxation credit/(expense)(1.0)(9.8) - 3.5 (20.4)(11.1)2.0 41.3 - 124.6 9.8 138.9

Net surplus/(loss) for the year(42.5)7.6 (20.4)15.7 42.3 57.2 (4.8)(42.5)442.2 (67.3)(93.4)294.1

Net surplus/(loss) attributable to owners of the company(39.4)2.4 (14.7)(8.5)48.5 45.9 (3.5)(42.6)442.2 (67.3)(88.2)274.8

Net surplus/(loss) attributable to non-controlling interests(3.1)5.2 (5.7)24.2 (6.2)11.3 (1.3)0.1 - - (5.2)19.3

Current assets58.3 - 4.3 65.4 154.3 65.9 23.5 360.8 - 349.0 (16.3)1,065.2

Non-current assets232.0 - 2.9 1,954.5 1,028.9 1,469.2 1.6 5,332.0 5,262.8 1,829.0 (2.6)17,110.3

Current liabilities66.0 - 3.7 154.3 213.4 43.9 51.5 715.5 - 948.8 (150.9)2,046.2

Non-current liabilities124.0 - 0.1 950.5 522.4 627.7 (2.0)2,634.4 - 2,587.6 155.5 7,600.2

Net assets100.3 - 3.4 915.1 447.4 863.5 (24.4)2,342.9 5,262.8 (1,358.4)(23.5)8,529.1

Net debt33.6 - (3.2)822.9 299.7 425.1 22.3 1,487.2 - 3,193.7 - 6,281.3

Non-controlling interest percentage 5.0% - 27.0% 34.0% 40.5%

43.2% 40.6% 0.2% - - -

Capital expenditure and investments71.8 9.8 0.4 111.6 31.2 46.8 - 245.7 843.0 9.3 - 1,369.6

OPERATING SEGMENTS

46
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report

Contents

Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

For the year ended 31 March 2025

Gurīn

Energy

Asia

$Millions

Manawa

Energy

New Zealand

$Millions

Mint

Renewables

Australia

$Millions

Wellington

International

Airport

New Zealand

$Millions

Qscan

Group

Australia

$Millions

RHCNZ

Medical

Imaging

New Zealand

$Millions

Anytime

Radiology

Group

Australia

$Millions

One NZ

New Zealand

$Millions

Restated

Associates

$Millions

All other

segments and

corporate

New Zealand

$Millions

Eliminations &

discontinued

operations

$Millions

Total

$Millions

Total revenue 5.9 491.0 0.3 185.3 345.6 369.9 -1,924.5 - 154.6 (523.4)2,953.7

Share of earnings of associate companies - - - - - - - - 493.7 - - 493.7

Inter-segment revenue - - - - - - - - - (97.9) - (97.9)

Total income5.9 491.0 0.3 185.3 345.6 369.9 -1,924.5 493.7 56.7 (523.4) 3,349.5

Depreciation(0.7)(21.7)(0.4)(29.9)(36.1)(26.0)-(338.2) - - 21.7 (431.3)

Amortisation of intangibles - (1.2) - - (0.4)(2.5)-(167.8) - - 1.2 (170.7)

Employee benefits(22.0)(38.8)(5.7)(15.9)(171.3)(173.6)-(254.2) - (0.4)38.8 (643.1)

Operating expenses(17.7)(368.0)(8.1)(77.9)(89.8)(70.3)-(1,071.8) - (385.2)308.8 (1,780.0)

Total operating expenditure(40.4)(429.7)(14.2)(123.7)(297.6)(272.4)-(1,832.0) - (385.6)370.5 (3,025.1)

Operating surplus before financing, derivatives, realisations

and impairments(34.5)61.3 (13.9)61.6 48.0 97.5 -92.5 493.7 (328.9)(152.9)324.4

Net gain/(loss) on foreign exchange and derivatives 1.1 (30.0) - 0.2 (0.7)(10.4)- - - (159.8)160.2 (39.4)

Net realisations, revaluations and impairments(0.1)(3.6) - (0.9) 5.3 (0.1)-(1.3) - (110.2)3.6 (107.3)

Interest income - 1.8 0.2 2.5 2.7 2.2 -18.1 - 10.7 (1.9)36.3

Interest expense(1.7)(29.2) - (35.6)(32.7)(46.9)-(228.4) - (124.6)61.4 (437.7)

Net financing expense(1.7)(27.4)0.2 (33.1)(30.0)(44.7)-(210.3)-(113.9)59.5 (401.4)

Net surplus/(loss) before taxation(35.2)0.3 (13.7)27.8 22.6 42.3 -(119.1)493.7 (712.8)70.4 (223.7)

Taxation credit/(expense)(0.6)(0.1) - (1.9)(6.3)(12.2)-30.8 - (56.1)0.1 (46.3)

Net surplus/(loss) for the year(35.8)0.2 (13.7)25.9 16.3 30.1 -(88.3)493.7 (768.9)70.5 (270.0)

Net surplus/(loss) attributable to owners of the company(33.2)(0.4)(9.9)17.1 9.3 15.3 -(88.5)493.7 (768.9)71.1 (294.4)

Net surplus/(loss) attributable to non-controlling interests(2.6)0.6 (3.8)8.8 7.0 14.8 -0.2 - - (0.6)24.4

Current assets 51.7 156.6 3.8 57.5 80.2 46.2 -373.3 - 239.2 - 1,008.5

Non-current assets 151.7 2,140.8 2.6 1,839.7 924.1 1,486.1 -5,038.1 3,838.3 247.7 354.9 16,024.0

Current liabilities 58.7 173.1 2.6 185.1 83.0 72.4 -517.6 - 45.0 363.4 1,500.9

Non-current liabilities 78.3 885.1 0.3 811.9 460.0 569.6 -2,519.6 - 2,296.2 (170.3)7,450.7

Net assets66.4 1,239.2 3.5 900.2 461.3 890.3 -2,374.2 3,838.3 (1,854.3)161.8 8,080.9

Net debt 21.6 501.1 (3.2)732.7 301.9 427.5 -1,428.7 - 2,175.8 - 5,586.1

Non-controlling interest percentage 5.0% 48.9% 27.0% 34.0%

42.8% 48.3% - 0.1% ----

Capital expenditure and investments 42.3 51.8 0.7 117.4 23.0 48.8 -269.6 791.0 8.7 - 1,353.3

OPERATING SEGMENTS

47
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report

Contents

Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

For the year ended 31 March 2026

New Zealand

$Millions

Australia

$Millions

Asia

$Millions

United States

$Millions

United Kingdom

& Europe

$Millions

Eliminations &

discontinued

operations

$Millions

Total

$Millions

Total revenue2,778.7 416.2 10.7 - - (160.7)3,044.9

Share of earnings of associate companies(7.8)762.7 - (205.7)(107.0) - 442.2

Inter-segment revenue55.5 - - - - (55.5) -

Total income2,826.4 1,178.9 10.7 (205.7)(107.0)(216.2)3,487.1

Depreciation(372.7)(39.4)(3.4) - - 5.6 (409.9)

Amortisation of intangibles(169.9)(0.8) - - - 0.2 (170.5)

Employee benefits(469.4)(226.0)(25.2) - - 14.2 (706.4)

Operating expenses(1,550.7)(133.4)(17.7) - - 192.4 (1,509.4)

Total operating expenditure(2,562.7)(399.6)(46.3) - - 212.4 (2,796.2)

Operating surplus before financing, derivatives, realisations and impairments263.7 779.3 (35.6)(205.7)(107.0)(3.8)690.9

Net gain/(loss) on foreign exchange and derivatives45.9 1.0 (0.4) - - (29.6)16.9

Net realisations, revaluations and impairments(75.7)53.2 (0.2) - - (76.6)(99.3)

Interest income20.4 3.11.5 - - (19.3)5.7

Interest expense(439.8)(38.5)(6.8) - - 26.1 (459.0)

Net financing expense(419.4)(35.4)(5.3) - - 6.8 (453.3)

Net surplus/(loss) before taxation(185.5)798.1 (41.5)(205.7)(107.0)(103.2)155.2

Taxation credit/(expense)148.5 (18.4)(1.0) - - 9.8 138.9

Net surplus/(loss) for the year(37.0)779.7 (42.5)(205.7)(107.0)(93.4)294.1

Current assets841.1 182.1 58.3 - - (16.3)1,065.2

Non-current assets10,393.1 5,006.0 232.0 771.9 709.8 (2.5)17,110.3

Current liabilities1,862.5 268.6 66.0 - - (150.9)2,046.2

Non-current liabilities6,800.2 520.5 124.0 - - 155.5 7,600.2

Net assets2,571.5 4,399.0 100.3 771.9 709.8 (23.4)8,529.1

Net debt5,928.9 318.8 33.6 - - - 6,281.3

Capital expenditure and investments413.8 588.7 71.8 177.9 117.4 - 1,369.6

OPERATING SEGMENTS - GEOGRAPHICAL

48
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report

Contents

Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

For the year ended 31 March 2025

Restated

New Zealand

$Millions

Australia

$Millions

Asia

$Millions

Restated

United States

$Millions

United Kingdom

& Europe

$Millions

Eliminations &

discontinued

operations

$Millions

Total

$Millions

Total revenue3,125.3 345.8 5.9 - - (523.3)2,953.7

Share of earnings of associate companies(7.1)548.9 - (30.1)(18.0) - 493.7

Inter-segment revenue(97.9) - - - - - (97.9)

Total income3,020.3 894.7 5.9 (30.1)(18.0)(523.3)3,349.5

Depreciation(415.8)(36.4)(0.7) - - 21.6 (431.3)

Amortisation of intangibles(171.4)(0.5) - - - 1.2 (170.7)

Employee benefits(482.9)(177.0)(22.0) - - 38.8 (643.1)

Operating expenses(1,973.3)(97.9)(17.7) - - 308.9 (1,780.0)

Total operating expenditure(3,043.4)(311.8)(40.4) - - 370.5 (3,025.1)

Operating surplus before financing, derivatives, realisations and impairments(23.1)582.9 (34.5)(30.1)(18.0)(152.8)324.4

Net gain/(loss) on foreign exchange and derivatives(200.1)(0.7)1.1 - - 160.3 (39.4)

Net realisations, revaluations and impairments(30.2)(80.6)(0.1) - - 3.6 (107.3)

Interest income35.2 2.9 - - - (1.8)36.3

Interest expense(464.7)(32.7)(1.7) - - 61.4 (437.7)

Net financing expense(429.5)(29.8)(1.7) - - 59.6 (401.4)

Net surplus/(loss) before taxation(682.9)471.8 (35.2)(30.1)(18.0)70.7 (223.7)

Taxation credit/(expense)(39.5)(6.3)(0.6) - - 0.1 (46.3)

Net surplus/(loss) for the year(722.4)465.5 (35.8)(30.1)(18.0)70.8 (270.0)

Current assets872.8 84.0 51.7 - - - 1,008.5

Non-current assets 10,804.1 3,733.6 151.7 320.6 680.6 333.4 16,024.0

Current liabilities 993.0 85.8 58.7 - - 363.4 1,500.9

Non-current liabilities7,082.2 460.5 78.3 - - (170.3)7,450.7

Net assets3,601.7 3,271.3 66.4 320.6 680.6 140.3 8,080.9

Net debt5,265.8 298.7 21.6 - - - 5,586.1

Capital expenditure and investments487.6 517.9 42.3 177.3 128.2 - 1,353.3

OPERATING SEGMENTS - GEOGRAPHICAL

49
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report

Contents

Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

(6) INVESTMENTS IN ASSOCIATES

Associates are those entities in which the Group has significant influence, but not control, over the financial

and operating policies. The Group’s investments in associates are made through a combination of equity,

and in certain instances shareholder loans to those entities.

Notes

2026

$Millions

Restated

2025

$Millions

Investments in associates are as follows:

Equity investments in associates4,971.23,592.7

Shareholder loans to associates291.7 245.7

Investments in associates5,262.93,838.4

Investments in associates are as follows:

CDC Data Centres6.13,972.6 2,402.6

RetireAustralia6.2 - 404.3

Longroad Energy 6.3580.5164.4

Kao Data6.4556.9 537.4

Galileo6.5152.9 143.4

Fortysouth6.6 - 186.3

Investments in associates5,262.93,838.4

Share of earnings of associate companies

are as follows:

CDC Data Centres6.1756.4 494.8

RetireAustralia6.26.3 54.1

Longroad Energy 6.3(205.7)(30.1)

Kao Data6.4(57.2)(10.0)

Galileo6.5(49.8)(8.0)

Fortysouth6.6(7.8)(7.1)

Share of earnings of associate companies442.2493.7

DEFERRED PAYMENTS FOR ASSOCIATES

The Group’s US$338 million capital commitment to Longroad is recognised as a financial liability. This

reflects that, upon execution of the agreement, the Group became unconditionally obligated to subscribe

for the full amount and received the associated shares at that time, with settlement structured to occur in

instalments. Accordingly, the arrangement represents a present obligation to deliver cash under NZ IAS 32,

rather than a commitment recognised as capital is called.

50
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report

Contents

Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

(6.1) CDC DATA CENTRES

CDC Data Centres ('CDC') is an owner, operator and developer of data centres, with operations in Canberra,

Sydney, Auckland and Melbourne. Infratil holds a 49.72% shareholding (31 March 2025: 48.17%) in CDC Group

Holdings Pty Ltd (the ultimate parent company of CDC Data Centres), alongside investment partners the

Commonwealth Superannuation Corporation (12.04%), Future Fund (34.53%) and CDC Data Centres

management (3.71%).

Infratil recognises its share of the associate's profit or loss based on its percentage holding of the shares

classified as equity under NZ IFRS. This may differ to the economic shareholding when certain shares are

classified as financial liabilities rather than equity under NZ IFRS.

Movement in the carrying amount of the Group’s

investment in CDC:

2026

$Millions

2025

$Millions

Carrying value at 1 April

2,402.6 1,416.4

Capital contributions557.0 494.2

Shareholder loans5.4 -

Capitalised transaction costs - 0.1

Total capital contributions during the year562.4 494.3

Interest on shareholder loan (including accruals)7.6 7.2

Share of associate’s surplus/(loss) before income tax1,184.6 757.2

Share of associate’s income tax (expense)(435.8)(281.5)

add: share of associate’s share capital issue, net of dilution

- 11.9

Total share of associate’s earnings during the year756.4 494.8

Share of associate’s other comprehensive income(18.2)(5.2)

less: Distributions received - -

less: Shareholder loan repayments including interest(9.9)(24.5)

less: WHT on shareholder loans(0.1)(1.1)

FX movements recognised in other comprehensive income279.427.9

Carrying value of investment in associate3,972.62,402.6

Summary financial information

2026

A$Millions

2025

A$Millions

Summary information for CDC is not adjusted for the percentage

ownership held by the Group (unless stated)

Current assets

479.2 238.3

Non-current assets

14,033.9 10,014.7

Total assets14,513.1 10,253.0

Current liabilities

856.3 1,245.9

Non-current liabilities

7,849.2 4,956.9

Total liabilities8,705.5 6,202.8

Net assets (100%)5,807.6 4,050.2

Group’s share of net assets2,999.1 2,025.1

Revenues

765.8 533.6

Net surplus/(loss) after tax

1,261.0 888.8

Total other comprehensive income

(32.3)(9.5)

2026

$Millions

2025

$Millions

Reconciliation of the Group’s investment in CDC:

Group’s share of net assets in NZD

3,594.5 2,224.2

Goodwill

194.2 12.3

add: Shareholder loan

165.8 149.5

add: Capitalised transaction costs

18.1 16.6

Carrying value of investment in associate3,972.62,402.6

CDC's functional currency is Australian Dollars (A$) and the summary financial information shown is presented in this

currency. The NZD/AUD exchange rates used to convert the summary financial information to the Group's functional

currency (NZ$) were 0.8344 (Spot rate) (2025: Spot rate 0.9105).

51
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report

Contents

Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

(6.2) RETIREAUSTRALIA

RetireAustralia is an owner, operator and developer of retirement villages, with villages in New South Wales,

Queensland and South Australia. Infratil held a 50% shareholding in RA (Holdings) 2014 Pty Limited (the

ultimate parent company of RetireAustralia), with investment partner the New Zealand Superannuation

Fund holding the other 50% until the sale in December 2025 (see note 9.3).

Movement in the carrying amount of the Group’s

investment in RetireAustralia:

2026

$Millions

2025

$Millions

Carrying value at 1 April404.3 436.6

Capital contributions - -

Total capital contributions during the year - -

Share of associate’s surplus/(loss) before income tax9.1 83.5

Share of associate’s income tax (expense)(2.8)(29.4)

Total share of associate’s earnings during the year6.3 54.1

Share of associate’s other comprehensive income - -

less: Distributions received - (5.4)

less: Impairment(92.5)(85.8)

FX movements recognised in other comprehensive income12.8 4.8

Transfer to held for sale(330.9) -

Carrying value of investment in associate - 404.3

Summary financial information

2026

A$Millions

2025

A$Millions

Summary information for RetireAustralia is not adjusted for the

percentage ownership held by the Group (unless stated)

Current assets361.3 342.5

Non-current assets3,559.6 3,468.1

Total assets3,920.9 3,810.6

Current liabilities2,602.8 2,535.2

Non-current liabilities414.2 383.1

Total liabilities3,017.0 2,918.3

Net assets (100%)903.9 892.3

Group’s share of net assets452.1 446.2

Group's share of net assets and carrying value of investment (NZ$)423.4 490.1

less: Impairment (NZ$)(92.5)(85.8)

Less: movement to asssets held for sale ($NZ)(330.9) -

Carrying value of investment in associate (NZ$) - 404.3

Revenues182.1

Net surplus/(loss) after tax100.8

Total other comprehensive income -

RetireAustralia's functional currency is Australian Dollars (A$) and the summary financial information shown is presented in

this currency. Unaudited Summary financial information is shown through to 31 July 2025 when the asset was moved to

held for sale prior to its disposal in December 2025. The NZD/AUD exchange rates used to convert the summary financial

information to the Group's functional currency (NZ$) were 0.8344 (Spot rate) (2025: Spot rate 0.9105).

52
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report

Contents

Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

(6.3) LONGROAD ENERGY

Longroad Energy Holdings, LLC ('Longroad Energy'), is a Boston, MA, headquartered renewable energy

developer focused on the development, ownership, and operation of utility-scale wind and solar energy

projects throughout North America. As at 31 December 2025 Infratil held a 37.17% (2025: 37.01%)

shareholding in Longroad Energy, alongside investment partners the New Zealand Superannuation Fund

(37.17%), MEAG (10.41%) and Longroad Energy management (15.25%).

Infratil recognises its share of the associate's profit or loss based on its percentage holding of the shares

classified as equity under NZ IFRS. This may differ to the economic shareholding when certain shares are

classified as financial liabilities rather than equity under NZ IFRS.

Movement in the carrying amount of the Group’s

investment in Longroad Energy: Notes

2026

$Millions

Restated

2025

$Millions

Carrying value at 1 April164.4 211.5

Restatement - (286.5)

Losses not recognised - 75.0

Capital contributions643.2168.5

Shareholder loans - -

Total capital contributions during the year643.2168.5

Share of associate’s surplus/(loss) before income tax(205.7)(30.1)

Share of associate’s income tax (expense) - -

Gain/(loss) on sale of interest - -

Total share of associate’s earnings during the year(205.7)(30.1)

Share of associate’s other comprehensive income(29.4)5.2

Share of associate’s other reserves - 22.7

Fair value movements - -

less: Distributions received - -

less: Capital returned - -

FX movements recognised in other comprehensive income8.0(1.9)

Carrying value of investment in associate580.5164.4

Summary financial information

31 December

2025

US$Millions

Restated

31 December

2024

US$Millions

Summary information for Longroad is not adjusted for the percentage

ownership held by the Group (unless stated)

Current assets544.8295.7

Non-current assets6,598.7 5,778.6

Total assets7,143.56,074.3

Current liabilities501.0 352.2

Non-current liabilities6,582.8 5,783.4

Total liabilities7,083.8 6,135.6

Net assets (100%)59.7(61.3)

Net assets attributable to owners of Longroad as at 31 December59.7(61.3)

Group’s share of net assets at 31 December26.2(26.9)

Group’s share of net assets at 31 December (NZ$)45.8(47.0)

Losses not recognised-74.9

Movements between 31 December and 31 March 202.982.6

Goodwill 331.853.9

Carrying value of investment in associate (NZ$)580.5164.4

Revenues579.6 401.2

Net surplus/(loss) after tax(81.5)(46.6)

Total other comprehensive income(39.1)36.4

Longroad's functional currency is United States Dollars (US$) and the summary financial information shown is presented in

this currency. The NZD/USD exchange rates used to convert the summary financial information to the Group's functional

currency (NZ$) were 0.5717 (Spot rate) (2025: Spot rate 0.5723). The summary information presented is derived from

the most recent audited annual financial statements of Longroad Energy Holdings, LLC (“LEH”), which are prepared in

accordance with NZ IFRS and have a reporting date of 31 December.

Letter of credit facility

Longroad has obtained an uncommitted secured letter of credit facility of up to US$200 million from HSBC

Bank. Letters of credit under the Facility are on issue to beneficiaries to support the development and

continued operations of Longroad. Infratil has provided shareholder backing of the Longroad Letter of Credit

facility, specifically, Infratil (the New Zealand Superannuation Fund and MEAG) have collectively agreed to

meet up to US$200 million of capital calls (i.e. subscribe for additional units) equal to Longroad’s

reimbursement obligation in the event that a Letter of Credit is called and Longroad cannot fund the call,

taking into account immediately available working capital. As at 31 March 2026, Infratil's share of Longroad's

Letter of Credit facility is 43.4% (31 March 2025: 43.4%). Letters of Credit on issue under the Longroad Letter

of Credit facility at 31 March 2026 are US$135.8 million (Infratil share: US$58.9 million) (31 March 2025:

US$139.7 million (Infratil share: US$60.6 million)).

53
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report

Contents

Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

(6.4) KAO DATA

Kao Data is an owner, operator and developer of data centres in the United Kingdom. Infratil holds a

54.7% (31 March 2025: 54.0%) shareholding in Kao Data, alongside Legal & General Group 33.4% and

Goldacre 11.7%.

Although Infratil holds a 54.7% interest in Kao Data, the Group does not have the current ability to direct the

relevant activities unilaterally nor is it required to make unanimous decisions with the same party. Accordingly

the Group does not control Kao Data under NZ IFRS 10 nor does it have joint control under NZ IFRS 11.

Movement in the carrying amount of the Group’s investment

in Kao Data:

2026

$Millions

2025

$Millions

Carrying value at 1 April537.4 431.8

Capital contributions64.5 83.0

Shareholder loans -

Capitalised transaction costs -

Total capital contributions during the year

64.5

83.0

Interest on shareholder loan (including accruals) - 4.6

Share of associate’s surplus/(loss) before income tax(45.6)(14.6)

Share of associate’s income tax (expense)(11.6)-

Total share of associate’s earnings in the year

(57.2)(10.0)

Share of associate’s other comprehensive income - -

less: Distributions received - -

less: Shareholder loan repayments including interest - -

FX movements recognised in other comprehensive income12.2 32.6

Carrying value of investment in associate

556.9 537.4

Summary financial information

2026

£Millions

2025

£Millions

Summary information for Kao Data is not adjusted for the

percentage ownership held by the Group (unless stated)

Current assets70.8 39.1

Non-current assets717.3 503.8

Total assets788.1 542.9

Current liabilities305.4 13.4

Non-current liabilities117.2 163.9

Total liabilities422.6 177.3

Net assets (100%)365.5 365.6

Group’s share of net assets199.8 197.5

Revenues73.7 63.8

Net profit/(loss) after tax(26.8)(11.3)

Total other comprehensive income - -

2026

$Millions

2025

$Millions

Reconciliation of the Group’s investment in Kao Data:

Group’s share of net assets in NZD460.7 446.2

Goodwill89.1 84.1

add: Shareholder loan - -

add: Capitalised transaction costs7.1 7.1

Carrying value of investment in associate556.9 537.4

Kao Data's functional currency is the Pound Sterling (GBP) and the summary financial information shown is presented in

this currency. The NZD/GBP exchange rates used to convert the summary financial information to the Group's functional

currency (NZ$) were 0.4336 (Spot rate) (2025: Spot rate 0.4427).

At 31 March 2026, Infratil has contributed £274.6 million (31 March 2025: £231.2 million).

54
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report

Contents

Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

(6.5) GALILEO

Galileo develops renewable energy projects across Europe. Infratil holds a 38% (31 March 2025: 38%)

shareholding in Galileo, alongside the New Zealand Superannuation Fund (19%), Commonwealth

Superannuation Corporation (19%), the Morrison & Co Growth Infrastructure Fund (19%) and Galileo

Management (5%).

Movement in the carrying amount of the Group’s

investment in Galileo:

2026

$Millions

2025

$Millions

Carrying value at 1 April143.4 99.1

Capital contributions33.8 13.3

Shareholder loans19.1 31.9

Capitalised transaction costs - -

Total capital contributions during the year

52.9

45.2

Interest on shareholder loan (including accruals)3.6 1.8

Share of associate’s surplus/(loss) before income tax(54.4)(9.6)

Share of associate’s income tax (expense)1.0 (0.2)

Total share of associate’s earnings in the year

(49.8)(8.0)

Share of associate’s other comprehensive income - -

Share of associate’s other reserves(2.5)3.9

less: Distributions received - -

less: Shareholder loan repayments including interest - -

FX movements recognised in other comprehensive income

8.9 3.2

Carrying value of investment in associate

152.9 143.4

Letter of credit facility

Galileo has obtained an uncommitted standby letter of credit facility of €90 million from ANZ (London

Branch), executed on 9 October 2020. Letters of credit under the facility are issued to beneficiaries to

support the development and construction of Galileo’s energy projects in Europe. Infratil has provided

shareholder backing of the Galileo Letter of Credit facility, specifically, Infratil (together with its co-investors)

has collectively agreed to meet up to €100 million of capital calls (i.e. subscribe for additional units) equal to

Galileo’s reimbursement obligation in the event that a Letter of Credit is called and Galileo cannot fund the

call. As at 31 March 2026, €46.0 million of Letters of Credit have been issued under the facility (Infratil

share: €17.5 million) (31 March 2025: €45.9 million (Infratil share: €17.4 million)).

Summary financial information

2026

€Millions

2025

€Millions

Summary information for Galileo is not adjusted for the

percentage ownership held by the Group (unless stated)

Current assets160.0 172.6

Non-current assets68.7 67.0

Total assets228.7 239.6

Current liabilities12.415.2

Non-current liabilities147.9117.0

Total liabilities160.3132.2

Net assets (100%)68.4107.4

Group’s share of net assets13.0 24.5

Revenues1.80.6

Net profit/(loss) after tax(71.9)(14.5)

Total other comprehensive income - (14.6)

2026

$Millions

2025

$Millions

Reconciliation of the carrying amount of the Group’s

investment in Galileo:

Group’s share of net assets in NZD26.1 46.3

add: Shareholder loan125.9 96.2

add: Capitalised transaction costs0.9 0.9

Carrying value of investment in associate152.9 143.4

Galileo's functional currency is the Euro (EUR) and the summary financial information shown is presented in this currency.

The NZD/EUR exchange rates used to convert the summary financial information to the Group's functional currency (NZ$)

were 0.4988 (Spot rate) (2025: Spot rate 0.5290).

At 31 March 2026, Infratil has contributed €117.2 million in total (2025: €89.2 million), in the form of shareholder loan

drawdowns (€59.4 million), management loan (€3.2 million) and capital contributions (€54.5 million) (31 March 2025:

shareholder loan drawdowns: €49.4 million, management loan drawdowns: €2.0 million, and capital contributions:

€37.8 million).


55
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report

Contents

Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

(6.6) FORTYSOUTH

Fortysouth is an owner, operator and developer of passive mobile tower infrastructure. Infratil holds a 20.0%

shareholding (31 March 2025: 20.0%) in Mahi Tahi Towers Limited (the ultimate parent company of

Fortysouth), alongside investment partners InfraRed Capital Partners (40.0%) and Northleaf Capital Partners

(40.0%). During the period, Fortysouth was moved to held for sale, see Note 9.4 for further information.

Movement in the carrying amount of the Group’s

investment in Fortysouth:

2026

$Millions

2025

$Millions

Carrying value at 1 April186.3 195.2

Capital contributions - -

Capitalised transaction costs - -

Total capital contributions during the period - -

Interest on shareholder loan (including accruals) - -

Share of associate’s surplus/(loss) before income tax(7.8)(25.4)

Share of associate’s income tax (expense) - 18.3

Total share of associate’s earnings in the period(7.8)(7.1)

Share of associate’s other comprehensive income - -

less: Distributions received(1.6)(1.8)

less: Investment transferred to held for sale(176.9)

Carrying value of investment in associate - 186.3

Summary financial information

2026

$Millions

2025

$Millions

Summary information for Fortysouth is not adjusted for the

percentage ownership held by the Group (unless stated)

Current assets15.7 15.3

Non-current assets2,104.5 2,107.1

Total assets2,120.2 2,122.4

Current liabilities20.3 20.2

Non-current liabilities1,217.0 1,172.7

Total liabilities1,237.3 1,192.9

Net assets (100%)882.9 929.5

Group’s share of net assets176.5 185.9

Revenues88.4

Net profit/(loss) after tax(67.1)

Total other comprehensive income-

2026

$Millions

2025

$Millions

Reconciliation of the carrying amount of the Group’s

investment in Fortysouth:

Group’s share of net assets176.5 185.9

Goodwill - -

add: Shareholder loan - -

add: Capitalised transaction costs0.4 0.4

less: movement to Assets for Sale ($NZ)(176.9)-

Carrying value of investment in associate - 186.3

Unaudited Summary financial information is shown through to 31 October 2025 when the asset was moved

to held for sale.

56
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report

Contents

Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

(7) OTHER INVESTMENTS

2026

$Millions

2025

$Millions

Contact Energy1,394.5 -

Clearvision Ventures191.5 156.2

Other33.1 41.8

Other investments1,619.1 198.0

Contact Energy

On 11 July 2025, as part consideration for Contact Energy’s ('Contact') acquisition of Manawa Energy, Infratil

received 93.3 million Contact shares with a fair value of $843.2 million ($9.04 per share) at the transaction

date. Infratil has elected to measure its investment in Contact at fair value through other comprehensive

income ('FVOCI') in accordance with NZ IFRS 9. The investment is classified as level 1 under the fair value

hierarchy as the valuation is based on the listed share price.

On 20 October 2025, Infratil acquired an additional 48.9 million shares in Contact Energy from the Tauranga

Energy Consumer Trust (TECT) for $437.7 million ($8.95 per share). The acquisition was funded using a

combination of existing debt capacity ($218.8 million) and the issue of $218.8 million of new Infratil shares

to TECT at $12.43 per share. On 19 February 2026, Infratil also participated in Contact Energy’s equity raise,

acquiring an additional 8.6 million shares for $75.1 million ($8.75 per share).

As at 31 March 2026, the fair value of Infratil’s investment in Contact Energy was $1,394.5 million, based

on Contact Energy’s closing share price of $9.25 on that date. The increase in fair value of $38.5 million has

been recognised in other comprehensive income. In addition, dividends of $44.2 million were recognised

in profit or loss during the period.

Clearvision Ventures

In February 2016, Infratil made an initial commitment of US$25 million to the California-based Clearvision

Ventures (‘Clearvision’). Further commitments of US$25 million and US$50 million were made in May 2020

and May 2022 respectively, bringing Infratil’s total commitments to US$100 million. The strategic objective

of the investment is to assist Infratil’s businesses to identify and engage with technological developments

that may impact their activities.

Infratil has elected to measure its investment in Clearvision at fair value through other comprehensive

income (‘FVOCI’) in accordance with NZ IFRS 9. The investment is held as an unlisted limited partner interest

and does not confer control or significant influence over the underlying funds.

Fair value is determined by reference to Infratil’s proportionate share of the net asset value of the Clearvision

funds, based on quarterly financial information provided by the fund manager. The underlying portfolio

investments are valued by Clearvision using market-based valuation techniques, including recent

arm’s-length funding transactions and, where appropriate, market comparable analyses.

While observable information is used where available, judgement is required in assessing the relevance

of recent transactions, selecting appropriate comparable companies, and determining adjustments for

differences in scale, growth expectations, liquidity and prevailing market conditions. Accordingly, the

valuation incorporates significant unobservable inputs and the investment is classified as a Level 3 fair

value measurement within the fair value hierarchy.

As at 31 March 2026, Infratil has made total contributions of US$68.2 million (31 March 2025:

US$62.7 million), with the remaining US$31.8 million commitment uncalled at that date.

57
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report

Contents

Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

(8) ACQUISITION OF SUBSIDIARIES

(8.1) ANYTIME RADIOLOGY

On 19 December 2025, Infratil invested A$104.3 million in Anytime Radiology Group (“Anytime”),

comprising A$89.3 million of equity, a A$5.0 million shareholder loan and a A$10.0 million convertible loan.

These funds, together with funding from other investors, were used by Anytime to acquire the teleradiology

businesses of RHCNZ and Qscan.

Following the transaction, Infratil held a 62.1% interest in Anytime. After assessing control, Infratil determined

that Anytime should be consolidated from the acquisition date.

Because Infratil controlled the teleradiology assets both before the transaction, through RHCNZ and Qscan,

and after the transaction, through Anytime, the transaction has been accounted for as a common control

transaction. It is therefore outside the scope of NZ IFRS 3 Business Combinations. The accounting policy for

common control transactions is set out in Note 1.

From Infratil’s consolidated perspective, the transaction represents a transfer of assets between

subsidiaries. Consolidation adjustments have therefore been made to eliminate the effects of the

transaction recorded by the individual subsidiaries and to present the transaction appropriately in the

Group financial statements.

(9) DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS AND ASSETS HELD FOR SALE

Summary of results of discontinued operations

2026

$Millions

2025

$Millions

Manawa Energy280.2 0.2

Net surplus from discontinued operations after tax280.2 0.2

(9.1) MANAWA ENERGY

On 7 May 2025, the New Zealand Commerce Commission (’NZCC’) granted Contact Energy (’Contact’)

clearance to acquire all the shares in Manawa Energy ('Manawa') under the Scheme of Arrangement

(’Scheme’) that was announced on 11 September 2024. On 11 July 2025, the acquisition of Manawa

by Contact was completed. The Group's 51.1% stake in Manawa was acquired for gross proceeds of

$1,022.4 million comprising cash consideration of $179.2 million and shares in Contact valued at

$843.2 million on completion date. The gain on sale was $272.6 million after transactions costs.

As the carrying amount of the Group’s investment in Manawa has been recovered through the sale

transaction, the investment in Manawa has been classified as a discontinued operation at 31 March 2026.

The comparative consolidated statement of comprehensive income and respective notes have been

restated to show the discontinued operation separately from continuing operations. The results from

discontinued operations are presented separately below.

2026

$Millions

2025

$Millions

Operating revenue125.5 491.0

Total income

125.5 491.0

Depreciation

(5.6)(21.7)

Amortisation of intangibles

(0.2)(1.2)

Employee benefits

(12.9)(38.8)

Operating expenses

(105.7)(368.0)

Total operating expenditure

(124.4)(429.7)

Operating surplus before financing, derivatives, realisations

and impairments1.1 61.3

Net gain/(loss) on foreign exchange and derivatives

23.1 (30.0)

Net realisations, revaluations and impairments

- (3.6)

Interest income

-1.8

Interest expense

(6.8)(29.2)

Net financing expense

(6.8)(27.4)

Net surplus/(loss) before taxation

17.4 0.3

Taxation credit/(expense)

(9.8)(0.1)

Net surplus/(loss) for the period

7.6 0.2

Net realisations, revaluations and impairments

272.6 -

Net surplus/(loss) from discontinued operations

280.2 0.2

Basic and diluted earnings per share (cents per share) from

discontinuing operations28.5 -

Total assets

-2,297.4

Total liabilities

-1,058.2

Net assets of discontinued operation

-1,239.2

The net gain on sale is calculated as follows:

Gross sale proceeds

1,022.4

Infratil carrying amount of assets and liabilities as at the

date of sale (including Goodwill)(748.3)

Gain on sale

274.1

Transaction costs

(1.5)

Net gain on sale272.6

58
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report

Contents

Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

The profit from the discontinued operation is 51.1% attributable to the owners of the Company in line with

the Group's ownership percentage in Manawa.

2026

$Millions

2025

$Millions

Cash flows from/(used in) discontinued operation

Net cash from/(used in) operating activities3.3 49.5

Net cash from/(used in) investing activities0.3 (48.7)

Net cash from/(used in) financing activities(1.3) -

Net cash flows for the period2.3 0.8

(9.2) INFRATIL INFRASTRUCTURE PROPERTY

In June 2022, the Board of Infratil Infrastructure Property Limited (IIPL) approved the marketing of IIPL’s

investment property at 100 Halsey Street, known as Wynyard 100, for potential sale. The property has

been classified as held for sale since that date.

On 30 November 2025, the sale of Wynyard 100 completed for $54.8 million, subject to final completion

adjustments. The investment property, right-of-use asset and lease liability were derecognised on

completion.

Wynyard 100 has not been classified as a discontinued operation, as it does not represent a separate major

line of business or geographical area of operation for the Group.

(9.3) RETIREAUSTRALIA

On 7 August 2025, Infratil and the New Zealand Superannuation Fund announced that they had entered into

a binding agreement to sell RetireAustralia to Invesco Real Estate, the global real estate investment business

of Invesco Ltd. The sale was subject to a limited number of conditions. At that date, the sale was assessed as

highly probable and the investment was classified as held for sale.

As a result, Infratil stopped equity accounting for RetireAustralia and measured the investment at fair value.

Fair value was based on the expected final sale proceeds. The sale completed on 19 December 2025. Infratil

received A$290.8 million, or NZ$333.2 million, after transaction costs, and derecognised its investment in

RetireAustralia. RetireAustralia has not been presented as a discontinued operation, as it does not represent

a separate major line of business or geographical area of operation for the Group.

(9.4) FORTYSOUTH

On 10 November 2025, Infratil entered into a conditional agreement to sell its 20% shareholding in

Fortysouth to InfraRed Capital Partners and Pantheon for a proposed consideration of $212.5 million. Based

on the terms of the transaction and the status at that date, the sale was assessed as highly probable and the

investment in Fortysouth was accordingly classified as held for sale.

Following classification as held for sale, Infratil ceased equity accounting for Fortysouth. The investment was

measured at the lower of its carrying value and fair value less costs to sell, based on the expected proceeds

from the transaction.

Fortysouth has not been presented as a discontinued operation, as it does not represent a separate major

line of business or geographical area of operation for the Group.

59
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report

Contents

Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

(10) REVENUE

2026

$Millions

2025

$Millions

Mobile service revenue1,020.1 965.3

Fixed service revenue

654.2 680.0

Device and other revenue

306.6 268.4

Other telecommunications revenue

20.6 8.1

Aircraft movement and terminal charges

112.2 110.4

Transport, hotel and other trading activities

52.1 51.4

Radiology practice services

182.9 189.4

Radiology services

585.3 521.8

Other

65.1 61.0

Total operating revenue2,999.1 2,855.8

Revenue Recognition Policies

The nature and timing of the various performance obligations in the Group’s contracts with customers and

property leases and when revenue is recognised is outlined below:

Description of performance obligations Timing and satisfaction of performance obligations

Mobile and fixed service revenue

This category includes One NZ's revenue from

mobile services, fixed line broadband and home

phone revenues.

Service revenue is recognised over time, when or

as One NZ performs the related service during the

agreed service period (usually monthly).

Customers typically pay in advance for prepay

mobile services and are billed and pay monthly for

other communication services. Fixed services

customers are billed and pay in arrears.

Description of performance obligations Timing and satisfaction of performance obligations

Device and other revenue

This category includes One NZ's device sales of,

mainly, handsets and modems.

For device sales made to customers, revenue is

recognised when the device is delivered to the end

customer. Customers typically pay for handsets

and other equipment either up-front at the time of

sale or over the term of the related service

agreement (usually 12 to 36 months), as the Group

performs the related service (usually monthly).

For device sales made to intermediaries such as

indirect channel dealers, revenue is recognised if

control of the device has transferred to the

intermediary and the intermediary has no right to

return the device to receive a refund; otherwise

revenue recognition is deferred until sale of the

device to an end customer by the intermediary or

the expiry of any right of return.

Aircraft movement and terminal charges

Aircraft movement and terminal charges consists

of Wellington International Airport's airfield

income, passenger service charges and terminal

service charges.

Airfield income consists of landing charges and

aircraft parking charges.

Landing charges and aircraft parking charges are

paid by the airlines and recognised as revenue at the

point in time the airport facilities are used by the

arriving or departing aircraft.

Passenger services charges and terminal service

charges relating to arriving, departing and transiting

passengers are paid by the airlines and recognised

as revenue at the point in time when the passenger

travels or the airport facilities are used.

Transport, hotel and other trading activities

Transport, hotel and other trading activities

includes Wellington International Airport's hotel

and access to the airport’s car parking facilities.

This category also includes income from the hotel

and carpark owned by Infratil Infrastructure

Property Limited.

Revenue from car parking is recognised at the point

in time where the utilisation of car parking facilities

has been completed.

Revenue from the hotels is recognised at the point in

time the service is delivered.

60
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report

Contents

Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

Description of performance obligations Timing and satisfaction of performance obligations

Radiology practice services

Radiology practice services revenue is derived by

Qscan Group from services to medical

practitioners. Revenue is recognised net of

amounts payable to doctors under Practice

Management Agreements.

Radiology practice services revenue is recognised

at the point in time when the services are delivered

to the medical practitioner.

Radiology services

Radiology services revenue is derived by Qscan

Group, RHCNZ Medical Imaging and Anytime

Radiology Group from providing radiology

services to patients.

Radiology services revenue is recognised at the

point in time when the radiology or other medical

imaging services are provided to a patient and a

charge is levied for this service.

Other revenue includes Wellington International Airport's retail concession fees and rental income. Retail

concession fees are recognised as revenue based upon passenger throughput or the turnover of the

concessionaires and in accordance with the related agreements. Rental income is recognised as revenue

on a straight-line basis over the term of the leases on leases where the group is the lessor.

(11) NET REALISATIONS, REVALUATIONS AND IMPAIRMENTS

2026

$Millions

2025

$Millions

Impairment of assets(92.7)(85.8)

Assets held for sale revaluation(15.5)(24.1)

Investment property revaluation6.3 1.6

Other realisations, revaluations and (impairments)2.6 1.0

Total other operating expenses(99.3)(107.3)

The current year impairment of assets primarily relates to the remeasurement of RetireAustralia to its final

sale value (refer Note 9.3). The investment in RetireAustralia was impaired in the prior year ($85.8 million)

following a review of the asset valuation, including comparisons to market-based comparables, where the

recoverable amount was determined to be lower than the carrying value.


(12) OPERATING EXPENSES

Notes

2026

$Millions

2025

$Millions

Trading operations

Line and generation asset maintenance costs - 8.2

Other electricity business costs29.7 16.0

Telecommunications - interconnect and access costs286.1 293.8

Telecommunications - device and other product costs335.7 295.4

Telecommunications - other direct and variable costs166.4 144.4

Telecommunications - outsourced services60.6 56.1

Telecommunications - IT and network costs158.3 139.1

Telecommunications - other operating business costs117.4 123.4

Diagnostic imaging costs168.5 158.2

Airport business costs42.6 38.0

Bad debts written off1.3 0.4

Increase/(Decrease) in expected credit losses22.1 6.0 14.2

Directors’ fees27 4.5 4.2

Administration and other corporate costs28.6 29.1

Management fee (to related party Morrison Infrastructure

Management Limited)29 101.4 456.2

Donations2.3 3.3

Total other operating expenses1,509.4 1,780.0

61
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report

Contents

Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

Fees paid to auditors (including fees paid by Associates)

2026

Fees paid to the

Group auditor

$000’s

2025

Audit fees paid to

other auditors

$000's

Audit and review of financial statements3,698.43,472.9

Regulatory audit work90.0 43.0

Other assurance services50.3 321.4

Taxation services - 71.7

Other services 73.0 59.5

3,911.73,968.5

Audit fees paid to the Group auditor recognised through associates1,363.5 1,860.2

Other fees paid to the Group auditor recognised through associates352.1 398.8

Total fees paid to the Group auditor

5,627.36,227.5

In the above table the audit fee includes the fees for both the annual audit of the financial statements and

the review of the interim financial statements. Regulatory audit work consists of the audit of regulatory

disclosures. Other assurance services comprise of agreed upon procedures, climate related assurance and

audit of compliance reports. Other services relate to an engineering contract advisory service provided to a

subsidiary of the group. Tax services relate to tax compliance work and tax advisory services provided to a

subsidiary of the group.

(13) TAXATION

(13.1) TAX RECONCILIATION

2026

$Millions

Restated

2025

$Millions

Net surplus before taxation from continuing operations155.2(223.7)

Taxation on the surplus for the year @ 28%

(43.5)62.6

Plus/(less) taxation adjustments:

Effect of tax rates in foreign jurisdictions

(21.5)(6.1)

Net benefit of imputation credits

7.0 -

Foreign tax credits

(0.2) -

Exempt dividends

- -

Tax losses

(12.5)(9.1)

Effect of equity accounted earnings of associates

176.9 143.5

Recognition of previously unrecognised deferred tax

5.5 -

(Over)/under provision in prior periods

83.9 2.9

Net investment realisations

(42.7)(6.7)

Other permanent differences

(14.0)(233.4)

Taxation credit/(expense)138.9(46.3)

Current taxation (13.7)(83.3)

Deferred taxation 152.637.0

Tax on discontinued operations(9.8)(0.1)

The Group is headquartered in New Zealand. The Group is within the scope of the OECD Pillar Two Model

Rules for all of the jurisdictions that it operates in for the financial reporting period ended 31 March 2026.

The Group has applied a temporary mandatory relief from deferred tax accounting in respect of the Pillar Two

Model Rules and will account for it as a current tax arising under the Pillar Two Model Rules when it is incurred.

Under Pillar Two legislation, the Group may be liable to pay a top-up tax where the effective tax rate per

jurisdiction, based on the specific Pillar Two calculation requirements, is below the 15% minimum rate. The

Group has assessed the exposure to Pillar Two income taxes and has no current tax exposure for the period

ended 31 March 2026.

62
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report

Contents

Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

(13.2) INCOME TAX RECOGNISED IN OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

2026

Before tax

$Millions

Tax

(expense) /

benefit

$Millions

Net of tax

$Millions

Differences arising on translation of foreign operations350.12.6352.7

Realisations on disposal of subsidiary, reclassified to profit

and loss(674.6) - (674.6)

Fair value change of equity investments61.8 - 61.8

Ineffective portion of hedges taken to profit and loss3.4 (3.4) -

Effective portion of changes in fair value of cash flow hedges147.0 (44.1)102.9

Fair value movements in relation to executive share scheme - - -

Net change in fair value of property, plant and equipment

recognised in equity 15.4 (5.7)9.7

Share of associates’ other comprehensive income(46.2) - (46.2)

Balance at the end of the year(143.1)(50.6)(193.7)

2025

Restated

Before tax

$Millions

Restated Tax

(expense) /

benefit

$Millions

Restated

Net of tax

$Millions

Differences arising on translation of foreign operations76.7 3.8 80.5

Realisations on disposal of subsidiary, reclassified to profit

and loss(3.5) - (3.5)

Fair value change of equity investments(1.0) - (1.0)

Ineffective portion of hedges taken to profit and loss(1.4)1.4 -

Effective portion of changes in fair value of cash flow hedges(170.1)46.2 (123.9)

Net change in fair value of property, plant and equipment

recognised in equity 229.6(37.4)192.2

Share of associates’ other comprehensive income29.2 - 29.2

Balance at the end of the year159.514.0 173.5

(13.3) DEFERRED TAX

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset on the Statement of Financial Position where they relate to

entities with a legally enforceable right to offset tax.

2026

$Millions

Restated

2025

$Millions

Balance at the beginning of the year(204.4)(254.4)

Charge for the year

142.537.0

Charge relating to discontinued operations

0.5 3.5

Deferred tax recognised in OCI

(50.6)10.3

Acquired with Business Combination

0.1 -

Reclassification of prior year difference

10.1 (3.9)

Effect of movements in foreign exchange rates

(3.2)7.1

Tax losses recognised/(utilised)

(13.2)(4.0)

Transfers on disposal of subsidiaries

235.4 -

Balance at the end of the year117.2(204.4)

The Infratil New Zealand Group is forecasting to derive taxable profits in future periods, sufficient to utilise

the tax losses carried forward and deductible temporary differences. As a result, deferred tax assets and

liabilities have been recognised where they arise, including deferred tax on tax losses carried forward.

63
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report

Contents

Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

(13.4) RECOGNISED DEFERRED TAX ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

31 March 2026

Assets

$Millions

Liabilities

$Millions

Net

$Millions

Property, plant and equipment30.2 (223.9)(193.7)

Investment properties - (2.6)(2.6)

Derivative financial instruments0.5 (3.7)(3.2)

Employee benefits19.8 - 19.8

Customer base assets - (107.1)(107.1)

Provisions30.9 - 30.9

Tax losses carried forward145.4 - 145.4

Lease liabilities358.8 - 358.8

Right of use assets - (336.3)(336.3)

Other items206.1(0.9)205.2

Total791.7(674.5)117.2

31 March 2025 Restated

Property, plant and equipment14.7 (442.0)(427.3)

Investment properties - (1.7)(1.7)

Derivative financial instruments43.1 (1.1)42.0

Employee benefits21.1 - 21.1

Customer base assets - (122.4)(122.4)

Provisions35.3 - 35.3

Tax losses carried forward90.9 (22.7)68.2

Lease liabilities353.7 (3.0)350.7

Right of use assets2.8 (330.0)(327.2)

Other items79.0 77.9 156.9

Total640.6 (845.0)(204.4)

(13.5) CHANGES IN TEMPORARY DIFFERENCES AFFECTING TAX EXPENSE

Tax expense/(credit)Other comprehensive income

2026

$Millions

Restated

2025

$Millions

2026

$Millions

Restated

2025

$Millions

Property, plant and equipment10.3 54.7 (5.7)(10.6)

Investment properties(0.9)0.4 - -

Derivative financial instruments(6.1)13.9 (44.1)39.2

Employee benefits0.4 2.6 - -

Customer base assets16.5 (5.7)(3.4)8.4

Provisions(4.4)(12.9) - -

Tax losses carried forward90.2 (89.7) - -

Lease liabilities2.8 51.1 - -

Right of use assets(3.7)(32.3) - -

Other items47.554.9 2.6(23.0)

152.637.0 (50.6)14.0

(13.6) IMPUTATION CREDITS AVAILABLE TO BE USED BY INFRATIL LIMITED

2026

$Millions

2025

$Millions

Balance at the end of the year8.5 5.6

Imputation credits that will arise on the payment/(refund)

of tax provided for

- -

Imputation credits that will arise on the (payment)/receipt

of dividends accrued at year end

- -

Imputation credits available for use8.5 5.6

64
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report

Contents

Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

(14) PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

2026

Communication and

network equipment

$Millions

Land and

civil works

$Millions

Buildings

$Millions

Vehicles, plant

and equipment

$Millions

Capital work

in progress

$Millions

Leasehold

improvements

$Millions

Renewable

generation assets

$Millions

Total

$Millions

Cost or valuation

Balance at beginning of year1,243.0 921.6 694.2 431.4 399.5 139.1 1,948.7 5,777.5

Additions91.4 18.9 - 56.7 281.9 4.2 0.1 453.2

Additions on acquisition of subsidiary - - - 1.4 10.7 1.0 - 13.1

Capitalised interest and financing costs - - - - - - - -

Disposals(3.6)(0.6) - (15.2) - (4.7) - (24.1)

Disposal of subsidiaries - (25.7)(2.2)(32.7)(92.9) - (1,948.7)(2,102.2)

Impairment - 0.4 - - - - - 0.4

Revaluation - 3.2 17.3 - - - - 20.5

Transfers between categories48.1 76.9 57.9 31.3 (334.1)33.4 86.5 -

Transfers to assets classified as held for sale(17.0) - - - - - - (17.0)

Transfer to right of use assets - - - - - - - -

Transfers to intangible assets - - - - (0.1)0.1 - -

Transfers from/(to) investment properties - - - - (4.6) - - (4.6)

Transfers from / (to) cost and accumulated depreciation(40.0) - - (3.6)0.5 - - (43.1)

Effect of movements in foreign exchange rates - (1.0) - 13.2 (5.7)5.6 (0.6)11.5

Balance at end of year1,321.9 993.7 767.2 482.5 255.2 178.7 86.0 4,085.2

Accumulated depreciation

Balance at beginning of year475.4 3.6 35.4 190.8 - 25.0 - 730.2

Depreciation for the year211.2 10.2 18.1 52.6 - 10.4 6.0 308.5

Transfer from/(to) cost and accumulated depreciation(41.8) - - (1.4) - - - (43.2)

Revaluation - - - - - - - -

Disposals(3.7) - - (14.5) - (2.8) - (21.0)

Disposal of subsidiaries - (4.0)(0.9)(17.5) - - (4.2)(26.6)

Transfers between categories - - - - - - - -

Transfer to assets classified as held for sale

(14.8) - - - - - - (14.8)

Effect of movements in foreign exchange rates - - - 6.2 - 1.3 - 7.5

Balance at end of year626.3 9.8 52.6 216.2 - 33.9 1.8 940.6

Carrying value at 31 March 2026695.6 983.9 714.6 266.3 255.2 144.8 84.2 3,144.6

65
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report

Contents

Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

Carrying value by Subsidiary

2026

Communication and

network equipment

$Millions

Land and

civil works

$Millions

Buildings

$Millions

Vehicles, plant

and equipment

$Millions

Capital work

in progress

$Millions

Leasehold

improvements

$Millions

Renewable

generation assets

$Millions

Total

$Millions

Gurīn Energy - 12.3 - 1.7 90.4 - 84.2 188.6

Anytime Radiology - - - (0.1)0.2 - - 0.1

Mint Renewables - - - 2.0 0.2 - - 2.2

One NZ695.6 - - 40.6 68.7 - - 804.9

Qscan Group - - - 94.8 6.8 55.0 - 156.6

RHCNZ Medical Imaging - - - 98.6 4.4 89.8 - 192.8

Wellington International Airport - 971.6 714.6 28.7 84.5 - - 1,799.4

Carrying value at 31 March 2026 695.6 983.9 714.6 266.3 255.2 144.8 84.2 3,144.6

66
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report

Contents

Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

(14) PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT CONTINUED

2025

Communication and

network equipment

$Millions

Land and

civil works

$Millions

Buildings

$Millions

Vehicles, plant

and equipment

$Millions

Capital work

in progress

$Millions

Leasehold

improvements

$Millions

Renewable

generation assets

$Millions

Total

$Millions

Cost or valuation

Balance at beginning of year1,053.2 914.8 660.1 372.7 404.7 113.7 1,705.7 5,224.9

Additions - 16.3 - 42.5 298.7 2.8 52.4 412.7

Additions on acquisition of subsidiary - - - - 4.5 - - 4.5

Capitalised interest and financing costs - - - - - - - -

Disposals(1.3)0.1 - (14.5) - (1.9)(0.1)(17.7)

Impairment - - - - - - (3.3)(3.3)

Revaluation - (30.0)25.4 - - - 194.0 189.4

Transfers between categories207.7 28.5 14.0 31.1 (305.3)24.0 - -

Transfers to assets classified as held for sale - - - - - - - -

Transfer to right of use assets - - - - - - - -

Transfers to intangible assets(16.6) - - (1.4)(6.1) - - (24.1)

Transfers from/(to) investment properties - (8.1)(5.3) - - - - (13.4)

Effect of movements in foreign exchange rates - - - 1.0 3.0 0.5 - 4.5

Balance at end of year1,243.0 921.6 694.2 431.4 399.5 139.1 1,948.7 5,777.5

Accumulated depreciation

Balance at beginning of year227.9 36.9 17.9 146.4 - 17.1 14.9 461.1

Depreciation for the year248.3 9.1 16.9 53.4 - 8.7 16.9 353.3

Depreciation and amortisation on

acquisition of subsidiary - - - - - - - -

Transfer from/(to) investment properties - - - - - - - -

Revaluation - (42.4) - - - - (31.8)(74.2)

Disposals(0.8) - 0.6 (9.2) - (0.9) - (10.3)

Transfers to assets classified as held for sale - - - - - - - -

Effect of movements in foreign exchange rates - - - 0.2 - 0.1 - 0.3

Balance at end of year475.4 3.6 35.4 190.8 - 25.0 - 730.2

Carrying value at 31 March 2025767.6 918.0 658.8 240.6 399.5 114.1 1,948.7 5,047.3

67
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report

Contents

Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

Carrying value by Subsidiary

2025

Communication and

network equipment

$Millions

Land and

civil works

$Millions

Buildings

$Millions

Vehicles, plant

and equipment

$Millions

Capital work

in progress

$Millions

Leasehold

improvements

$Millions

Renewable

generation assets

$Millions

Total

$Millions

Gurīn Energy - - - 0.5 111.3 - - 111.8

Manawa Energy - 17.0 1.4 15.5 89.1 - 1,948.7 2,071.7

Mint Renewables - - - 1.8 - - - 1.8

One NZ767.6 - - 33.7 57.1 - - 858.4

Qscan Group - - - 79.6 3.5 50.7 - 133.8

RHCNZ Medical Imaging - - - 88.1 17.0 63.4 - 168.5

Wellington International Airport - 901.0 657.4 21.4 121.5 - - 1,701.3

Carrying value at 31 March 2025767.6 918.0 658.8 240.6 399.5 114.1 1,948.7 5,047.3

For assets held at fair value less accumulated depreciation valuations are undertaken on a systematic basis

at least every five years. In years where a valuation is not undertaken, a material change assessment of each

asset class is performed to assess whether carrying amounts differ materially from fair value. This

assessment is undertaken with assistance from independent experts and includes reference to projections

of future revenues, volumes, operational and capital expenditure profiles, capacity, terminal values, the

application of discount rates and replacement values (as relevant to each class of asset) as an indicator of a

possible material change in fair value. Where a material change in fair value is identified, the carrying value is

adjusted to bring carrying value materially in line with fair value.

As at 31 March 2026, for Wellington International Airport assets measured at fair value less accumulated

depreciation, where no external valuation was undertaken, a material change assessment was performed.

A summary of the fair value considerations are provided below.

Wellington International Airport’s property, plant and equipment

Wellington Airport’s Land, Civil Assets and Buildings are measured at fair value.

Land

The Group's assessment of land includes reference to NZ and Wellington house price indices published by

Real Estate Institute of NZ, changes in commercial and industrial property values and consideration of other

key inputs. Using the last independent external valuation performed for the year ended 31 March 2023 as

a base, further work was performed to estimate fair value including an assessment of key inputs into land

value. Based on this assessment, there is no material change in the estimated fair value of Land compared

to the prior year ended 31 March 2025 (2025: no material change).

Civil Assets

Civil Assets were valued based on the Group's assessment which includes reference to the Capital Goods

Price Index and the Producers Price Index, a fair value increase of $3.2m has been made to the carrying

value of these assets in the Asset Revaluation Reserve and Other Comprehensive Income (2025: a full

revaluation was undertaken with a net increase of $12.4 million).

Buildings

The Buildings asset class is comprised of three main sub-components; (a) Specialised buildings, (b) Vehicle

business assets and (c) Hotel business assets.

(a) Specialised buildings

Based on the Group's assessment which includes reference to the capital goods price index and consumer

price index, a fair value increase of $6.9 million has been made to the carrying value of these assets in the

Asset Revaluation Reserve and Other Comprehensive Income (2025: $5.7 million).

(b) Vehicle business assets

Based on the Group's assessment which includes reference to passenger forecasts and discounted cash

flow modelling, a fair value increase of $9.9 million has been made to the carrying value of these assets in

the Asset Revaluation Reserve and Other Comprehensive Income (2025: $17.4 million).

(c) Hotel business assets

Based on the Group's assessment which includes reference to passenger forecasts and discounted cash

flow modelling, a fair value increase of $0.5 million has been made to the carrying value of these assets in

the Asset Revaluation Reserve and Other Comprehensive Income (2025: $2.3 million).

68
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report

Contents

Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

The following table summarises the valuation approach and key assumptions used by the independent

valuers to arrive at fair value at the date of the last independent external valuation. Where there have been

fair value adjustments in the year ended 31 March 2026, further detail has been provided under the

respective asset classes below.

Asset classification and description

Valuation

approachKey valuation assumptions

+/- 5%

Valuation

impact

Land

Aeronautical land - used for airport

activities and specialised aeronautical

assets.

Non-aeronautical land - used for

non-aeronautical purposes e.g.

industrial, service, retail, residential

and land associated with the vehicle

business.

Market

Value for

Existing Use

(’MVEU’)

Average

MVAU rate

per hectare

$2.74 million

per hectare

+/- $28.0m

Developer’s

WACC rate

12.20%+/- $15.0m

Holding

period

6 years+/- $22.0m

Last external valuation undertaken as at 31 March 2023 by independent valuers, CBRE Limited. For the

year ended 31 March 2026, a material change assessment has been undertaken, and further work carried

out which indicates no material change in fair value compared to 31 March 2025. In relation to the value

at 31 March 2026, a 5% change in the indices referenced equates to +/- $29.0 million in fair value. A 5%

change in developers WACC rate equates to +/- $16.0 million in fair value.

Asset classification and description

Valuation

approachKey valuation assumptions

+/- 5%

Valuation

impact

Civil

Civil works includes sea

protection and site services,

excluding such site services

to the extent that they would

otherwise create duplication

of value.

Optimised

Depreciated

Replacement

Cost (’ODRC’)

Average cost

rates per sqm

for concrete,

asphalt, base

course and

foundations

Concrete $163

Asphalt $191

Basecourse

$142

Foundations

$30

+/- $4.5m

Estimated

remaining

useful life

Average

remaining useful

life 23.5 years

+/- $7.1m

Last external valuation undertaken as at 31 March 2025 by independent valuers, Beca Limited valued civil

assets at $291.4 million. For the year ended 31 March 2026, a material change assessment has been

undertaken, and for the further work carried out which resulted in a fair value increase of $3.2 million. In

relation to the value at 31 March 2026, a 5% change in the indices referenced equates to +/- $2.1 million

in fair value. .

Asset classification and description

Valuation

approachKey valuation assumptions

+/- 5%

Valuation

impact

Buildings

Specialised buildings used for

identified airport activities.

Non-specialised buildings used

for purposes other than

for identified airport activities,

including space allocated within

the main terminal building for

retail activities, offices and

storage.

Optimised

Depreciated

Replacement

Cost (’ODRC’)

Average

modern

equivalent

asset rate

(per sqm)

$9,273


$2,089

+/- $15.7m


+/- $0.2m

Vehicle business assets

associated with car parking and

taxi, shuttle and bus services

(excluding land and civil).

Discounted

Cash flows

(’DCF’) and

Capitalisation

Rate

Revenue

growth

Cost growth

Discount rate

Capitalisation


2.20%

2.12%

9.75%

7.75%


+/- $0.5m

+/- $0.5m

+/- $4.8m

+/- $7.5m

Last external valuation undertaken as at 31 March 2023 by independent valuers, CBRE Limited. For the

year ended 31 March 2026, a material change assessment has been undertaken, and further work carried

out which resulted in a fair value increase of $17.3 million. In relation to the value of specialised buildings

at 31 March 2026, a 5% change in the indices referenced equates to +/- $0.5 million in fair value. In

relation to the value of vehicle business assets, a 2% change in passenger cashflow forecasts equates

to +/- $10.0 million in fair value.

69
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report

Contents

Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

Asset classification and description

Valuation

approachKey valuation assumptions

+/- 5%

Valuation

impact

Hotel business assets

Discounted

Cash flows

(’DCF’) and

Capitalisation

Rate

Capitalisation

rate

7.25%+/- $1.6m

Discount rate9.25%+/- $0.8m

Last external valuation undertaken as at 31 March 2023 by independent valuers, CBRE Limited. For the year

ended 31 March 2026, a material change assessment has been undertaken, and further work carried out

which resulted in a fair value increase of $0.5 million. In relation to the value at 31 March 2026, a 5% change

in the indices referenced equates to +/- $1.2 million in fair value.

Effect of level 3 fair value measurements on profit or loss and other comprehensive income

The following table summarises for property, plant and equipment measured at fair value, classified as level 3

in the fair value hierarchy, the effect of the fair value movements on profit or loss and other comprehensive

income for the year. Items classified as level 3 contain valuation inputs for the asset that are not based on

observable market data.

2026

Recognised in

profit or loss

$Millions

Recognised

in OCI

$Millions

Total

$Millions

Level 3 fair value movements

Renewable generation assets - - -

Land and civil works - 3.2 3.2

Buildings

- 17.3 17.3

- 20.5 20.5

2025

Recognised in

profit or loss

$Millions

Recognised

in OCI

$Millions

Total

$Millions

Level 3 fair value movements

Renewable generation assets(3.3)225.8 222.5

Land and civil works - 12.4 12.4

Buildings

- 25.4 25.4

(3.3)263.6 260.3

There were no transfers between property, plant and equipment assets classified as level 1 or level 2, and

level 3 of the fair value hierarchy during the year ended 31 March 2026 (2025: nil).

Revalued assets at deemed cost

For each revalued class the carrying amount that would have been recognised had the assets been carried

on a historical cost basis are as follows:

2026

Cost

$Millions

Accumulated

depreciation

$Millions

Net book

value

$Millions

Renewable generation assets -

-

-

Land and civil works516.5

(82.7)

433.8

Buildings655.7

(224.8)

430.9

1,172.2 (307.5)864.7

2025

Cost

$Millions

Accumulated

depreciation

$Millions

Net book

value

$Millions

Renewable generation assets766.9

-

766.9

Land and civil works440.2 (82.4)357.8

Buildings777.1 (300.6)476.5

1,984.2 (383.0)1,601.2

70
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report

Contents

Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

(15) INVESTMENT PROPERTIES

2026

Owned

property

$Millions

Right of use

assets

$Millions

Total

$Millions

Balance at beginning of year103.1

-

103.1

Additions -

-

-

Disposals -

-

-

Transfers from/(to) property, plant and equipment4.6

-

4.6

Investment properties revaluation net increase/(decrease)6.3

-

6.3

Transfers to assets held for sale -

-

-

Balance at end of year114.0 - 114.0

2025

Owned

property

$Millions

Right of use

assets

$Millions

Total

$Millions

Balance at beginning of year90.0 35.2 125.2

Additions - - -

Disposals(2.0)(35.2) (37.2)

Transfers from/(to) property, plant and equipment13.4 - 13.4

Investment properties revaluation net increase/(decrease)(22.3)(0.2) (22.5)

Transfers to assets held for sale

24.0 0.2 24.2

Balance at end of year103.1 - 103.1

The Group’s investment properties relate to properties held by Wellington International Airport for the

primary purpose of earning rental income. The fair value of these properties is estimated each year by an

independent valuer, Jones Lang LaSalle, and reflects market conditions at balance date. Changes in market

conditions, or in the assumptions used to estimate fair value, may result in changes to the fair value of the

investment properties.

The valuation of Wellington International Airport’s investment properties is based on a discounted cash

flow and capitalisation rate approach. The fair value at 31 March 2026 was $114.0 million (31 March 2025:

$103.1 million).

Where a lease relates to property held to earn rental income, the right-of-use asset is included within

investment properties and measured at fair value.

Rental income from investment properties of $14.1 million was recognised in profit or loss during the year

(2025: $15.1 million). Direct operating expenses arising from investment properties of $1.6 million were also

recognised in profit or loss during the year (2025: $3.3 million).

The following table summarises the valuation approach and key assumptions used by the independent

valuer to determine fair value. The most recent external valuation was undertaken by Jones Lang LaSalle

as at 31 March 2026.

Description

Valuation

approach

Fair value

hierarchy

levelSignificant unobservable inputs

Relationship of

unobservable inputs

to fair value

Wellington

International

Airport

Airport Retail

Park and other

properties held

to earn rental

income.

DCF and

Cap rate

3 Weighted

average

discount rate

7.85%

(2025: 7.63%)

An increase in the

discount rate will

decrease the fair

value.

Weighted

average

income

capitalisation

rate

6.69+%

(2025: 7.04%)

An increase

in the capitalisation

rate will decrease the

fair value.

Weighted

average lease

term

3.173 years

(2025: 3.13

years)

An increase in the

average lease term

will ordinarily increase

the fair value.

Last external valuation undertaken as at 31 March 2026 by independent valuers, Jones Lang LaSalle.

71
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report

Contents

Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

(16) LEASES

(16.1) RIGHT OF USE ASSETS

Right of use assets related to leased properties that do not meet the definition of investment properties are

summarised below. Land and buildings right of use assets include land held under ground leases and rental of

office space.

2026

Cell sites

$Millions

Land and

Buildings

$Millions

Plant and

equipment

$Millions

Total

$Millions

Cost

Balance at beginning of year

802.4 475.6 145.1 1,423.1

Additions

71.7 122.3 2.6 196.6

Additions on acquisition of subsidiary

- 10.0 - 10.0

Disposals

(10.7)(59.6)(4.3)(74.6)

Disposals - discontinued operations

- (11.6)(0.2)(11.8)

Remeasurements

- 0.9 - 0.9

Effect of movements in exchange rates

- 13.2 - 13.2

Transfers to assets held for sale - - - -

Balance at end of year863.4 550.8 143.2 1,557.4

Accumulated depreciation

Balance at beginning of year88.2 178.9 25.9 293.0

Depreciation for the year51.4 49.0 6.6 107.0

Effect of movements in exchange rates - 6.5 -6.5

Disposals(2.3)(48.8)(4.3)(55.4)

Disposals - discontinued operations - (2.7)(0.2)(2.9)

Transfers to assets held for sale - - - -

Balance at end of year137.3 182.9 28.0 348.2

Carrying value at 31 March 2026726.1 367.9 115.2 1,209.2

2025

Cell sites

$Millions

Land and

Buildings

$Millions

Plant and

equipment

$Millions

Total

$Millions

Cost

Balance at beginning of year

749.8

407.6 140.4 1,297.8

Additions

66.0

42.5 5.7 114.2

Additions on acquisition of subsidiary

-

- - -

Disposals

(13.4)

(12.7)(1.0)(27.1)

Remeasurements

-

36.9 - 36.9

Effect of movements in exchange rates

-

1.3 - 1.3

Transfers to assets held for sale

- -

- -

Balance at end of year802.4 475.6 145.1 1,423.1

Accumulated depreciation

Balance at beginning of year

42.9 139.8 20.2

202.9

Depreciation for the year

47.8 45.5 6.4 99.7

Effect of movements in exchange rates

- 0.4 - 0.4

Disposals

(2.5)(6.8)(0.7)(10.0)

Transfers to assets held for sale

- - - -

Balance at end of year88.2 178.9 25.9 293.0

Carrying value at 31 March 2025714.2 296.7 119.2 1,130.1

Lease liabilities relate to the Group’s obligations to make lease payments for leased assets recognised on

the balance sheet. The following table presents a maturity analysis of these lease liabilities, showing the

undiscounted lease payments payable after the reporting date.

72
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report

Contents

Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

(16.2) LEASE LIABILITIES

2026

$Millions

2025

$Millions

Maturity analysis - contractual undiscounted cash flows

Between 0 to 1 year

172.7 156.1

Between 1 to 2 years

165.2 158.2

Between 2 to 5 years

445.9 379.8

More than 5 years

1,514.3 1,526.6

Change attributable to held for sale

- (207.0)

Total undiscounted lease liabilities2,298.1 2,013.7

2026

$Millions

2025

$Millions

Lease liabilities included in the statement of financial position

Split as follows:

Current

87.5 82.7

Non-current

1,237.7 1,086.8

1,325.2 1,169.5

2026

$Millions

2025

$Millions

Amounts recognised in the consolidated statement of comprehensive

income

Interest on lease liabilities

92.215.2

Variable lease payments not included in the measurement of lease

liabilities

0.6 -

Income from sub-leasing right of use assets

0.5 0.5

Expenses relating to short-term leases

3.2 0.6

Expenses relating to leases of low-value assets, excluding short-term

leases of low-value assets 0.4 0.2

The weighted average incremental borrowing cost applied to lease liabilities at 1 April 2025 was 7.32%

(1 April 2024: 7.02%). Total cash outflow for leases for the year ended 31 March 2026 was $164.4 million

(2025: $169.4 million).

(16.3) LEASES AS A LESSOR

The Group has receivables from operating leases relating to the lease of premises. The following table sets

out a maturity analysis of lease payments, showing the undiscounted lease payments to be received after

the reporting date.

2026

$Millions

2025

$Millions

Operating lease receivables as lessor

Between 0 to 1 year

29.8 26.0

Between 1 to 2 years

22.3 22.7

Between 2 to 5 years

34.4 36.3

More than 5 years27.2 33.3

Total undiscounted lease payments

113.7 118.3

73
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report

Contents

Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

(17) GOODWILL

2026

$Millions

2025

$Millions

Balance at beginning of the year4,682.0 4,677.0

Goodwill arising on acquisitions46.5 0.5

Goodwill disposed of during the year(61.9) -

Goodwill impaired during the year(0.2) -

Transfers to disposal group assets classified as held for sale - -

Fair value adjustments on finalisation of goodwill - (1.2)

Effects of movements in exchange rates60.1 5.7

Balance at the end of the year4,726.5 4,682.0

The aggregate carrying amounts of goodwill allocated to each

investment are as follows:

Manawa Energy - 61.9

Anytime Radiology103.1 -

One NZ2,880.4 2,880.1

Qscan Group727.3 659.0

RHCNZ Medical Imaging1,015.7 1,081.0

4,726.5 4,682.0

ANYTIME RADIOLOGY GROUP

During the period, the teleradiology businesses of RHCNZ and Qscan were transferred to Anytime

Radiology, as disclosed in Note 8.1, including associated goodwill of $103.1 million. This transfer resulted in

the recognition of a new single CGU for the purposes of goodwill impairment testing.

QSCAN GROUP

Cash Generating Units

Goodwill is allocated to a single consolidated cash-generating unit (CGU) within Qscan. The business

generates cash inflows through a single cohort of doctors operating across the entire network, and cash

flows cannot be separately identified by geography or individual clinics.

Impairment testing

Goodwill was tested for impairment at 31 March 2026 using a fair value less costs of disposal (FVLCD)

approach, being the higher of FVLCD and value in use (VIU).

The recoverable amount was determined using a discounted cash flow model based on portfolio company

board -approved forecasts over a five-year forecast period with a terminal value thereafter. Future cash flows

were discounted using a post-tax weighted average cost of capital (WACC) of 10.84% (31 March 2025:

11.13%). A terminal growth rate of 3.5% (31 March 2025: 3.5%) was applied.

Key assumptions underpinning the cash flow forecasts include historical revenue growth and EBITDA margins,

industry trends, new clinic growth and associated capital expenditure, strategic growth initiatives, and

execution of key operational strategies.

As the recoverable amount exceeded the carrying value, no impairment was recognised. Reasonably possible

changes in key assumptions underpinning the valuation models do not lead to impairment.


RHCNZ MEDICAL IMAGING

Cash Generating Units

Goodwill is allocated across the following cash-generating units within RHCNZ: Pacific Radiology (PRG),

Auckland Radiology (ARG), and Bay Radiology (BRL). Each CGU represents a separately identifiable

operational unit with distinct cash inflows.

Impairment testing

Goodwill was tested for impairment at 31 March 2026 using a value in use (VIU) approach.

The recoverable amounts were determined using discounted cash flow models based on portfolio company

board-approved forecasts over a ten-year forecast period with a terminal value thereafter. Future cash

flows were discounted using a pre-tax WACC of 9.7% (31 March 2025: 9.5%). A terminal growth rate of 3.5%

(31 March 2025: 3.5%) was applied.

Key assumptions underpinning the cash flow forecasts include revenue growth, EBITDA margins, WACC

and terminal growth.

As the recoverable amount exceeded the carrying value, no impairment was recognised. Reasonably

possible changes in key assumptions underpinning the valuation models do not lead to impairment.


ONE NZ

Cash Generating Units

Goodwill in One NZ Limited is allocated across the two separate cash-generating units of

Telecommunications and Fibre.

Impairment testing

Goodwill was tested for impairment at 31 March 2026 using a FVLCD approach, being the higher of

FVLCD and VIU.

The recoverable amounts were determined using discounted cash flow models based on portfolio company

board-approved forecasts over a ten-year forecast period with a terminal value thereafter. Future cash flows

were discounted using blended post-tax weighted average costs of capital (WACC) ranging from 7.9% to

8.2% (mid-point 8.1%) (31 March 2025: 7.8% - 8.2%, mid-point of 8.0%) for Telecommunications and from

7.1% to 7.5% (mid-point 7.3%) (31 March 2025: 7.0% - 7.4%, mid-point of 7.2%) for EonFibre. A terminal growth

rate of 2.25% (31 March 2025: 2.25%) was applied for both CGUs.

Key assumptions underpinning the cash flow forecasts include revenue growth, operating expense

forecasts, customer numbers and churn, capital expenditure, discount rates and terminal growth.

As the recoverable amount exceeded the carrying value, no impairment was recognised. Reasonably

possible changes in key assumptions underpinning the valuation models do not lead to impairment.

74
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report

Contents

Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

(18) INTANGIBLES

2026

Radio

spectrum

licences

$Millions

Software

$Millions

Construction

in progress

$Millions

Customer

contracts

$Millions

Brands

$Millions

Total

$Millions

Cost or valuation

Balance at beginning of the year145.1 336.0 56.6 443.4 169.1 1,150.2

Additions at cost - 33.5 58.4 - - 91.9

Additions on acquisition of subsidiary - - - - - -

Disposals - - - - - -

Disposal of subsidiary - (10.4) - (2.0) - (12.4)

Impairment - - - - - -

Transfers between categories - 59.3 (59.3) - - -

Transfers from property, plant and equipment - 0.1 (0.1) - - -

Transfers to assets classified as held for sale

- - - - - -

Transfer between cost and accumulated depreciation

0.3 (6.6)4.8 - 25.5 24.0

Effect of movements in exchange rates - - - 0.4 4.0 4.4

Balance at end of year145.4 411.9 60.4 441.8 198.6 1,258.1

Amortisation and impairment losses

Balance at beginning of the year(27.2)(180.0) - (121.0)(10.1)(338.3)

Amortisation for the year(17.0)(84.8) - (61.0)(7.9)(170.7)

Disposals - - - - - -

Disposal of subsidiary - 8.5 - 0.2 - 8.7

Impairment - - - - - -

Transfers - - - - - -

Transfer between cost and accumulated depreciation - (6.1) - - (17.8)(23.9)

Effect of movements in exchange rates - - - 0.2 - 0.2

Balance at end of year(44.2)(262.4) - (181.6)(35.8)(524.0)

Carrying value 31 March 2026101.2 149.5 60.4 260.2 162.8 734.1

75
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report

Contents

Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

(18) INTANGIBLES CONTINUED

2025

Radio

spectrum

licences

$Millions

Software

$Millions

Construction

in progress

$Millions

Customer

contracts

$Millions

Brands

$Millions

Total

$Millions

Cost or valuation

Balance at beginning of the year

125.1 234.5 41.8 441.3 168.7 1,011.4

Additions at cost

- 5.0 87.5 2.0 - 94.5

Additions on acquisition of subsidiary

20.0 - - - - 20.0

Disposals

- (0.1)(0.2) - - (0.3)

Impairment

- - - - - -

Transfers between categories

- 76.8 (76.8) - - -

Transfers from property, plant and equipment

- 19.8 4.3 - - 24.1

Effect of movements in exchange rates

- - - 0.1 0.4 0.5

Balance at end of year

145.1 336.0 56.6 443.4 169.1 1,150.2

Amortisation and impairment losses

Balance at beginning of the year

(10.6)(92.5) - (58.8)(4.6)(166.5)

Amortisation for the year

(16.6)(87.6) - (62.2)(5.5)(171.9)

Disposals

- 0.1 - - - 0.1

Impairment

- - - - - -

Transfers

- - - - - -

Effect of movements in exchange rates

- - - - - -

Balance at end of year

(27.2)(180.0) - (121.0)(10.1)(338.3)

Carrying value 31 March 2025

117.9 156.0 56.6 322.4 159.0 811.9

76
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report

Contents

Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

(19) LOANS AND BORROWINGS

This note provides information about the contractual terms of the Group’s interest bearing loans and

borrowings.

2026

$Millions

2025

$Millions

Current liabilities

Unsecured bank loans

- 94.1

Secured bank loans

400.2 17.5

less: Loan establishment costs capitalised and amortised over term

(3.2)(6.2)

397.0 105.4

Non-current liabilities

Unsecured bank loans

100.0 712.5

Secured bank loans

3,784.6 2,389.3

less: Loan establishment costs capitalised and amortised over term

(24.1)(19.6)

3,860.5 3,082.2

Facilities utilised at reporting date

Unsecured bank loans

100.0 806.6

Unsecured guarantees

- -

Secured bank loans

4,184.8 2,406.8

Secured guarantees

7.1 5.5

Facilities not utilised at reporting date

Unsecured bank loans

225.0 1,680.7

Unsecured guarantees

- -

Secured bank loans

1,385.3 510.8

Secured guarantees

- -

Facilities utilised at reporting date

Interest bearing loans and borrowings - current

397.0 105.4

Interest bearing loans and borrowings - non-current

3,860.5 3,082.2

Total interest bearing loans and borrowings

4,257.5 3,187.6

2026

$Millions

2025

$Millions

Maturity profile for bank facilities (excluding secured guarantees):

Between 0 to 1 year

482.1 373.3

Between 1 to 2 years

2,261.6 556.0

Between 2 to 5 years

3,053.5 4,421.1

Over 5 years

71.1 54.5

Total bank facilities

5,868.3 5,404.9

FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS

Wholly owned subsidiaries

Infratil Finance Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, has entered into bank facility

arrangements with a negative pledge agreement, which, with limited exceptions does not permit the Infratil

Guaranteeing Group (‘IGG’) to grant any security over its assets. The IGG comprises entities subject to a

cross guarantee and comprises Infratil Limited, Infratil Finance Limited and certain other wholly owned

subsidiaries. These facilities are primarily used to fund the corporate and investment activities of the

Company. The IGG does not incorporate the underlying assets of the Company’s non-wholly owned

subsidiaries and associates. The IGG bank facilities also include restrictions over the sale or disposal of

certain assets without bank agreement. Liability under the cross guarantee is limited to the amount of debt

drawn under the IGG facilities, plus any unpaid interest and costs of recovery.

At 31 March 2026 there was $1,637.5 million of drawn debt under the IGG facilities (31 March 2025:

$616.6 million) and undrawn IGG facilities totalled $855.3 million (31 March 2025: $1,365.7 million).

Non-wholly owned subsidiaries

The Group’s non-wholly owned subsidiaries also enter into bank facility arrangements. Amounts outstanding

under these facilities are included within loans and borrowings in the table above. Wellington International

Airport’s facilities are subject to negative pledge arrangements, which, with limited exceptions does not

permit those entities to grant security over their respective assets. One NZ, Qscan Group and RHCNZ

Medical Imaging borrow under syndicated bank debt facilities, under which security is granted over their

respective assets. All non-wholly owned subsidiary facilities are subject to restrictions over the sale or

disposal of certain assets without bank agreement.

The various bank facilities across the Group require the relevant borrowing group to operate within defined

performance and gearing ratios as is typical of debt facilities of this nature. Throughout the period the Group

has complied with all debt covenant requirements as imposed by the respective lenders.

Interest rates

Interest rates payable on bank loan facilities are floating rate determined by reference to prevailing money

market rates at the time of draw-down plus a margin. Interest rates paid during the year ranged from 3.30%

to 7.91% (31 March 2025: 4.64% to 8.98%).

77
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report

Contents

Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

(20) INFRATIL INFRASTRUCTURE BONDS

2026

$Millions

2025

$Millions

Balance at the beginning of the year1,633.1 1,464.9

Issued during the year

122.6 326.2

Exchanged during the year

(22.6)(76.2)

Matured during the year

(141.1)(80.0)

Purchased by Infratil during the year

- -

Bond issue costs capitalised during the year

(1.6)(3.9)

Bond issue costs amortised during the year

2.6 2.4

Issue premium amortised during the year

(0.3)(0.3)

Balance at the end of the year

1,592.7 1,633.1

Current

156.1 161.5

Non-current fixed coupon

1,081.5 1,117.6

Non-current variable coupon

123.2 122.1

Non-current perpetual variable coupon

231.9 231.9

Balance at the end of the year

1,592.7 1,633.1

2026

$Millions

2025

$Millions

Repayment terms and interest rates:

IFT250 maturing in June 2025, 6.15% p.a. fixed coupon rate

- 43.4

IFT270 maturing in December 2028, 6.78% p.a. fixed coupon rate

146.2 146.2

IFT280 maturing in December 2026, 3.35% p.a. fixed coupon rate

156.3 156.3

IFT300 maturing in March 2026, 3.35% p.a. fixed coupon rate

- 120.3

IFT310 maturing in December 2027, 3.60% p.a. fixed coupon rate

102.4 102.4

IFT320 maturing in June 2030, 5.93% p.a. fixed coupon rate until

June 2026

115.9 115.9

IFT330 maturing in July 2029, 6.90% p.a. fixed coupon rate

150.0 150.0

IFT340 maturing in March 2031, 7.08% p.a. fixed coupon rate

127.2 127.2

IFT350 maturing in December 2031, 7.06% p.a. fixed coupon rate

204.5 204.5

IFT360 maturing in December 2030, 6.00% p.a. fixed coupon rate

121.7 121.7

IFT370 maturing in June 2032, 6.16% p.a fixed coupon rate

122.6 -

IFTHC maturing in December 2029, 5.20% p.a. variable coupon rate,

reset annually

123.2 123.2

IFTHA Perpetual Infratil infrastructure bonds

231.9 231.9

less: issue costs capitalised and amortised over term

(9.2)(10.2)

add: issue premium capitalised and amortised over term

- 0.3

Balance at the end of the year

1,592.7 1,633.1

Fixed coupon

The fixed coupon bonds the Company has on issue are at a face value of $1.00 per bond. Interest is

payable quarterly on the bonds.

IFTHC bonds

The IFTHC bonds the Company has on issue are at a face value of $1.00 per bond. Interest is payable

quarterly on the bonds. The coupon for the IFTHC bonds for the 1-year period from (but excluding)

15 December 2025 was fixed at 5.20% per annum (for the 1-year period to 15 December 2025 the

coupon was 6.24%). Thereafter the rate will be reset annually at 2.50% per annum over the then one

year swap rate for quarterly payments.

78
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report

Contents

Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

IFT320 bonds

The interest rate of the IFT320 bonds is fixed at 5.93% for the first four years and will then reset on 15 June

2026 for a further four years. The interest rate for the IFT320 bonds for the period from (but excluding)

15 June 2026 until the maturity date will be the sum of the four year swap rate on 15 June 2026 plus a

margin of 2.00% per annum.

Perpetual Infratil infrastructure bonds (’PIIBs’)

The Company has 231,917,000 (31 March 2025: 231,917,000) PIIBs on issue at a face value of $1.00

per bond. Interest is payable quarterly on the bonds. On 15 November 2025 the coupon was set at 3.90%

per annum until the next reset date, being 15 November 2026 (2025: 5.15%). Thereafter the rate will be

reset annually at 1.50% per annum over the then one year swap rate for quarterly payments, unless Infratil's

gearing ratio exceeds certain thresholds, in which case the margin increases. These infrastructure bonds

have no fixed maturity date. No PIIBs (2025: nil) were repurchased by Infratil Limited during the year.

Throughout the year the Company complied with all debt covenant requirements as imposed by its bond

supervisor.

At 31 March 2026 Infratil Infrastructure bonds (including PIIBs) had a fair value of $1,545.2 million

(31 March 2025: $1,572.6 million).

(21) WELLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BONDS AND USPP NOTES

2026

$Millions

2025

$Millions

Repayment terms and interest rates:

WIA050 Retail bonds maturing June 2025, 5.00% p.a. fixed coupon rate

- 70.0

WIA060 Retail bonds maturing April 2030, 5.63% p.a. fixed coupon rate

100.0 100.0

WIA070 Retail bonds maturing August 2026, 2.50% p.a. fixed coupon rate

100.0 100.0

WIA080 Retail bonds maturing September 2031, 3.32% p.a. fixed coupon rate

124.8 123.9

WIA090 Retail bonds maturing August 2028, 5.78% p.a. fixed coupon rate

75.0 75.0

WIA100 Retail bonds maturing September 2030, 6.02% p.a. fixed coupon rate

100.0 100.0

WIA110 Retail bonds maturing April 2031, 5.09% p.a. fixed coupon rate

125.8 -

USPP Notes - Series A (US$36 million)

60.4 60.1

USPP Notes - Series B (US$36 million)

60.3 60.0

less: Issue costs capitalised and amortised over term

(2.6)(3.3)

Balance at the end of the year

743.7 685.7

Current

100.0 70.0

Non-current

643.7 615.7

Balance at the end of the year

743.7 685.7

The Trust Deed for the retail bonds requires Wellington International Airport (’Wellington Airport’) to operate

within defined performance and debt gearing ratios. The arrangements under the Trust Deed creates

restrictions over the sale or disposal of certain assets. Throughout the year Wellington Airport complied

with all debt covenant requirements as imposed by the retail bond supervisor.

Wellington Airport’s USPP comprised two equal tranches, Series A of US$36 million 10 year Note with a

coupon of 3.47%, maturing July 2027 and Series B of US$36 million 12 year Note with a coupon of 3.59%,

maturing July 2029. In conjunction with the USPP issuance, Wellington Airport entered into cross currency

interest rate swaps (’CCIRS’) to hedge the exposure to foreign currency risk over the term of the notes.

At 31 March 2026 Wellington Airport's bonds had a fair value of $634.5 million (2025: $580.0 million),

and Wellington Airport's USPP Notes had a fair value of $125.1 million (2025: $126.0 million).

The USPP notes are measured at amortised cost, translated to New Zealand dollars using the spot rate at

balance date.

As at 31 March 2026, included in Note 19, are Wellington International Airport's bank facilities amounting

to $325 million (31 March 2025: $200 million), with $110 million drawn (31 March 2025: $60 million).

These facilities and the US$72 million USPP Notes have certain financial covenants which were all met as

at 31 March 2026.

79
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report

Contents

Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

(22) FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT

This note provides information about the Group’s financial instruments and its exposure to financial risks,

including credit risk, liquidity risk and market risk. These risks are managed in accordance with the Group's

treasury and risk management policies, with oversight from management and the Audit and Risk

Committee. The following sections describe the Group’s exposure to each financial risk, the policies and

processes used to manage those risks, the fair value of financial instruments and the Group’s approach

to capital management.

(22.1) CREDIT RISK

Credit risk is the risk that a counterparty will default on its contractual obligations, resulting in financial loss

to the Group. The Group is exposed to credit risk in the normal course of business including those arising

from trade receivables with its customers, financial derivatives and transactions (including cash balances)

with financial institutions. The Group minimises its exposure to credit risk of trade receivables through the

adoption of counterparty credit limits and standard payment terms. Derivative counterparties and cash

transactions are limited to high-credit-quality financial institutions and organisations in the relevant industry.

The Group’s exposure and the credit ratings of significant counterparties are monitored, and the aggregate

value of exposures are spread across approved counterparties. The carrying amounts of financial assets

recognised in the Statement of Financial Position best represent the Group’s maximum exposure to credit

risk at the reporting date. Generally no security is held on these amounts.

Cash and cash equivalents

2026

$Millions

2025

$Millions

The Group had exposure to credit risk with financial institutions at

balance date from cash deposits held as follows:

Financial institutions with ’AA’ credit ratings

- -

Financial institutions with ’AA-’ credit ratings

259.0 244.2

Financial institutions with ’A+’ credit ratings

28.3 28.3

Financial institutions with ’A’ credit ratings

0.3 0.1

Unrated financial institutions

25.0 21.1

Total cash deposits with financial institutions

312.6 293.7

Cash on hand

- -

Total Cash and cash equivalents

312.6 293.7

No cash was included in assets held for sale at 31 March 2026 (31 March 2025: nil). Credit ratings are from

S&P Global Ratings or equivalent rating agencies.

Trade and other receivables

The Group has exposure to various counterparties. Concentration of credit risk with respect to trade and

other receivables is limited due to the Group’s large customer base in a diverse range of industries and

geographies.

Ageing of trade receivables

2026

$Millions

2025

$Millions

The ageing analysis of trade receivables is as follows:

Not past due

248.2 204.5

Past due 0-30 days

39.3 36.8

Past due 31-90 days

9.1 6.6

Greater than 90 days

16.0 17.0

Total

312.6 264.9

The ageing analysis of impaired trade receivables is as follows:

Not past due

(2.0)(2.4)

Past due 0-30 days

(0.9)(1.3)

Past due 31-90 days

(0.8)(1.2)

Greater than 90 days

(6.3)(10.0)

Total

(10.0)(14.9)

Movement in the provision for expected credit loss for the year

was as follows:

Balance as at 1 April

14.9 15.5

Acquired through acquisition of subsidiary

(1.3)(0.9)

Expected credit loss recognised (charged to operating expenses)

(14.1)10.0

Bad debts recovered

(6.0)3.4

Provisions made/(utilised)

17.1 (13.1)

Disposed through disposal of subsidiary

(0.6) -

Balance as at 31 March

10.0 14.9

Other prepayments and receivables

325.5 295.2

Total Trade, accounts receivable and prepayments

628.1 545.2

80
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report

Contents

Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

(22.2) LIQUIDITY RISK

Liquidity risk is the risk that the Group cannot meet its contracted cash flow obligations as they fall due. The

Group monitors liquidity risk by forecasting cash flows and assessing the maturity profile of its financial

assets, liabilities and funding facilities.

The Group’s approach is to maintain sufficient liquidity to meet its obligations under both normal and stress

conditions, without incurring unacceptable losses or risking damage to the Group’s reputation. This is

supported by maintaining sufficient cash and committed credit facilities, managing the spread of debt

maturities, and maintaining access to capital markets as required.

The Group also manages maturity concentration by regularly assessing its funding maturity profile and

maintaining aggregate maturities within acceptable limits. Refinancing discussions for debt facilities

typically commence at least six months before maturity. Facilities are maintained with highly rated financial

institutions and across a diversified group of bank counterparties.

The tables below analyses the Group's financial liabilities, excluding gross settled derivative financial

liabilities and deferred tax, into relevant maturity groupings based on the earliest possible contractual

maturity date at year end. The amounts in the tables below are contractual undiscounted cash flows, which

include interest through to maturity. Perpetual Infratil Infrastructure Bonds interest cash flows have been

determined by reference to the longest dated Infratil bond maturity in the year 2032. Contractual cash flows

exclude liabilities held for sale at 31 March 2026.

Contractual cash flows

31 March 2026

Balance

sheet

$Millions

Contractual

cash flows

$Millions

6 months

or less

$Millions

6 to 12

months

$Millions

1 to 2

years

$Millions

2 to 5

years

$Millions

5 +

years

$Millions

Accounts payable, accruals and other liabilities 1,103.0 1,073.7 780.6 44.5 170.5 38.2 39.9

Deferred payments for associates591.7591.7189.4262.4 139.9 - -

Lease liabilities 1,325.2 2,298.1 86.4 86.3 165.2 445.9 1,514.3

Unsecured & secured bank facilities 4,257.5 4,773.6209.0351.21,532.32,593.587.6

Infratil Infrastructure bonds 1,360.8 1,707.1 40.4 195.4 177.0 947.0 347.3

Perpetual Infratil Infrastructure bonds 231.9 56.4 4.5 4.5 9.0 27.1 11.3

Wellington International Airport bonds 743.7 897.8 116.8 16.8 95.5 412.2 256.5

Derivative financial instruments 27.7 43.8 17.5 8.2 6.5 12.9 (1.3)

9,641.511,442.21,444.6969.32,295.94,476.82,255.6

31 March 2025

Accounts payable, accruals and other liabilities 1,244.0 1,133.9 705.8 47.4 188.6 117.4 74.7

Lease liabilities 1,169.5 2,013.7 76.2 75.7 153.9 367.8 1,340.1

Unsecured & secured bank facilities 3,187.6 3,586.1147.4 70.1856.22,512.4 -

Infratil Infrastructure bonds 1,401.2 1,602.7 80.8 156.8 220.3 540.5 604.3

Perpetual Infratil Infrastructure bonds 231.9 85.76.4 6.4 12.8 38.3 21.8

Wellington International Airport bonds 685.7 837.1 85.4 13.6 127.3 269.9 340.9

Manawa Energy bonds 373.4 413.2 8.1 8.1 397.0 - -

Derivative financial instruments 367.1 431.6224.453.4115.029.0 9.8

8,660.4 10,104.0 1,334.5431.52,071.13,875.3 2,391.6

81
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report

Contents

Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

(22.3) MARKET RISK

Market risk is the risk that changes in market prices, such as interest rates and foreign exchange rates, will

affect the Group’s income or the value of its holdings of financial assets and liabilities. The objective of

market risk management is to manage and control market risk exposures within acceptable parameters,

while minimising the volatility in the Group's NZD cashflows.

(22.3.1) Interest rate risk (cash flow and fair value)

Interest rate risk is the risk of interest rate volatility negatively affecting the Group's interest expense cash

flow and earnings. Infratil mitigates this risk by managing it's interest rate exposures in accordance with the

Group's treasury policies, which sets out defined maximum and minimum hedging levels that are maintained

as a proportion of forecast total drawn debt. Infratil achieves compliance with these thresholds by issuing

fixed rate bonds or entering into interest rate derivatives to adjust its fixed rate exposure profile. Borrowings

issued at fixed rates expose the Group to fair value interest rate risk.

2026

$Millions

2025

$Millions

At balance date the face value of interest rate contracts outstanding

were:

Interest rate swaps - notional value

4,783.6 5,402.9

Fair value of interest rate swaps

14.6 (10.7)

Fair value adjustments

9.4 (13.2)

Cross currency interest rate swaps - notional value

99.8 99.8

Fair value of cross currency interest rate swaps

20.8 20.2

The termination dates for the interest rate swaps are as follows:

Between 0 to 1 year

370.0 1,175.9

Between 1 to 2 years

869.8 795.0

Between 2 to 5 years

2,618.9 2,096.0

Over 5 years

925.0 1,336.0

The termination dates for the cross currency interest rate swaps are

as follows:

Between 0 to 1 year

- -

Between 1 to 2 years

49.9 -

Between 2 to 5 years

49.9 99.8

Over 5 years

- -

Interest rate sensitivity analysis

The following table shows the impact on post-tax profit and equity of a movement in bank interest rates of

100 basis points higher/lower with all other variables held constant.

2026

$Millions

2025

$Millions

Profit or loss

100 bp increase

6.3 25.1

100 bp decrease

(8.5)(27.4)

Other comprehensive income

100 bp increase

47.4 36.0

100 bp decrease

(49.7)(35.7)

Assumptions used in the interest rate sensitivity analysis include:

Reasonably possible movements in interest rates were determined based on a review of historical

movements. A movement of 100 basis points higher/lower is considered appropriate to demonstrate the

sensitivity of the Group to movements in interest rates. The sensitivity was calculated by taking interest rate

instruments including loans and borrowings, bonds, interest rate swaps and cross currency interest rate

swaps at balance date and adjusting the interest rate upwards and downwards to quantify the resulting

impact to profit or loss and other comprehensive income.

82
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report

Contents

Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

(22.3.2) Foreign currency risk

The Group has exposure to foreign currency risk on the value of its net investment in foreign investments,

assets and liabilities, future investment obligations and future income. Decisions to enter into forward cover

for foreign currency cash flows are recognised once the underlying cash flows are expected to occur.

Decisions on buying forward cover to hold against foreign currency investments are subject to the Group’s

expectations of the fair value of the relevant exchange rate.

The Group may enter into forward exchange contracts to reduce the risk from price fluctuations of foreign

currency commitments and to hedge the risk of its net investment in foreign operations. Any resulting

differential to be paid or received as a result of the currency hedging of the asset is reflected in the final cost

of the asset.

The following table shows the impact on post-tax profit and equity if the New Zealand dollar had weakened

or strengthened by 10% against the currencies with which the Group has foreign currency risk with, all other

variables held constant.

20262025

+ 10%

$Millions

- 10%

$Millions

+ 10%

$Millions

- 10%

$Millions

Profit or loss

AUD

(8.4)8.4 (11.8) 11.8

EUR

(1.6)1.5 (2.0) 2.0

GBP

-- - -

USD

1.9 (2.4)(0.3) 0.3

Other comprehensive income

AUD

(282.8)282.8 (197.6) 197.6

EUR

0.1 (0.2)(12.8) 15.4

GBP

(10.5)10.5 (10.5) 10.5

USD

(34.7)39.3(49.6)52.1

Assumptions used in the foreign currency exposure sensitivity analysis include:

Reasonably possible movements in foreign exchange rates were determined based on a review of historical

movements. A movement of plus or minus 10% has been applied to the NZD/AUD, NZD/USD, NZD/EUR

and NZD/GBP exchange rates to demonstrate the sensitivity of foreign currency risk of the company’s

investment in foreign operations and associated derivative financial instruments. The sensitivity was

calculated by taking each currency pair's spot rate as at balance date, moving this spot rate by plus and

minus 10% and then reconverting the foreign currency balances with the ‘new spot-rate’.

Unhedged foreign currency exposures

At balance date the Group has the following unhedged exposure to foreign currency risk arising on foreign

currency monetary assets and liabilities that fall due within the next twelve months:

2026

$Millions

2025

$Millions

Cash, short term deposits and trade receivables

United States Dollars (USD)

1.6 3.8

Australian Dollars (AUD)

2.9 48.9

Euro (EUR)

1.0 2.0

Pound Sterling (GBP)

0.7 0.1

Bank overdraft, bank debt and accounts payable

United States Dollars (USD)

0.1 -

Australian Dollars (AUD)

1.1 1.2

83
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report

Contents

Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

(22.4) FAIR VALUE OF DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

In certain circumstances, the Group uses derivatives to manage exposure to market risks. These derivatives

are measured and disclosed at fair value. The carrying values of derivative financial assets and liabilities

recognised in the statement of financial position are set out below:

Assets

2026

$Millions

2025

$Millions

Derivative financial instruments - energy - 114.3

Derivative financial instruments - cross currency interest rate swaps

20.8 20.2

Derivative financial instruments - foreign exchange

4.1 3.3

Derivative financial instruments - interest rate

36.0 35.9

60.9 173.7

Split as follows:

Current

6.6 80.5

Non-current

54.3 93.2

60.9 173.7

Liabilities

Derivative financial instruments - energy - 298.5

Derivative financial instruments - cross currency interest rate swaps

- -

Derivative financial instruments - foreign exchange

6.3 22.0

Derivative financial instruments - interest rate

21.4 46.6

27.7 367.1

Split as follows:

Current

14.1 132.4

Non-current

13.6 234.7

27.7 367.1

Determination of fair value

The fair value of derivative financial instruments is determined using quoted market prices where available.

Where quoted prices are not available, fair value is estimated using discounted cash flow analysis, based on

the applicable yield curve or available forward price data for the term of the instrument.

For derivatives valued using discounted cash flow analysis, the key valuation inputs are:

• forward price curve (for the relevant underlying interest rates, foreign exchange rates or commodity

prices); and.

• discount rates.

The selection of valuation inputs requires judgement. As a result, a range of reasonably possible assumptions

could be used to estimate the fair value of these derivatives. The Group maximises the use of observable

market data when selecting inputs and developing assumptions for valuation techniques.

A summary of common valuation inputs and their sources is set out below:

Valuation inputSource

Interest rate forward price curvePublished market swap rates

Foreign exchange forward pricesPublished spot foreign exchange rates

Electricity forward price curveMarket quoted prices where available and

management’s best estimate based on

its view of the long run marginal cost of new

generation where no market quoted prices are

available

Discount rate for valuing interest rate derivativesPublished market interest rates as applicable to

the remaining life of the instrument

Discount rate for valuing forward foreign exchange

contracts

Published market rates as applicable to the

remaining life of the instrument

The selection of variables requires significant judgement and therefore there is a range of reasonably

possible assumptions in respect of these variables that could be used in estimating the fair value of these

derivatives. Maximum use is made of observable market data when selecting variables and developing

assumptions for the valuation techniques.

84
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report

Contents

Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

Fair value hierarchy

The table below analyses financial instruments carried at fair value, by valuation method. The different levels

have been defined as follows:

• Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (level 1)

• Inputs other than quoted prices included within level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either

directly (that is, as prices) or indirectly (that is, derived from prices) (level 2)

• Inputs for the asset or liability that are not based on observable market data (that is, unobservable inputs)

(level 3).

The following tables present the Group’s financial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value.

31 March 2026

Level 1

$Millions

Level 2

$Millions

Level 3

$Millions

Total

$Millions

Assets per the statement of financial position

Derivative financial instruments - energy - - - -

Derivative financial instruments - cross currency

interest rate swaps - 20.8 - 20.8

Derivative financial instruments - foreign exchange1.8 2.3 - 4.1

Derivative financial instruments - interest rate4.9 31.1 - 36.0

Total6.7 54.2 - 60.9

Liabilities per the statement of financial position

Derivative financial instruments - energy - - - -

Derivative financial instruments - cross currency

interest rate swaps - - - -

Derivative financial instruments - foreign exchange - 6.3 - 6.3

Derivative financial instruments - interest rate - 21.4 - 21.4

Total - 27.7 - 27.7

31 March 2025

Level 1

$Millions

Level 2

$Millions

Level 3

$Millions

Total

$Millions

Assets per the statement of financial position

Derivative financial instruments - energy - - 114.3 114.3

Derivative financial instruments - cross currency

interest rate swaps - 20.2 - 20.2

Derivative financial instruments - foreign exchange0.2 3.1 - 3.3

Derivative financial instruments - interest rate0.4 35.5 - 35.9

Total0.6 58.8 114.3 173.7

Liabilities per the statement of financial position

Derivative financial instruments - energy - - 298.5 298.5

Derivative financial instruments - cross currency

interest rate swaps

- - - -

Derivative financial instruments - foreign exchange - 22.0 - 22.0

Derivative financial instruments - interest rate0.3 46.3 - 46.6

Total0.3 68.3 298.5 367.1

There were no transfers between derivative financial instrument assets or liabilities classified as level 1 or

level 2, and level 3 of the fair value hierarchy during the year ended 31 March 2026 (31 March 2025: none).

85
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report

Contents

Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

(23) CLIMATE RISK ASSESSMENT AND MITIGATION

Infratil recognises the importance of assessing and managing climate-related risks. As a responsible investor

in infrastructure assets, Infratil acknowledges the potential impacts of climate change on its portfolio and is

committed to taking proactive measures to address these risks.

Assessment of Climate Risks

Infratil has conducted an assessment of climate-related risks, considering both physical risks and transition

risks associated with climate change.

As of 1 April 2023, the Group is a Climate Reporting Entity for the purpose of the Financial Markets Conduct

Act 2013 (‘FMCA’). On 31 July 2025, Infratil released its mandatory Climate Related Disclosures, covering

the FY2025 period. Further information on the Group’s response to climate-related risks and disclosures is

available here https://infratil.com/for-investors/reports-results-meetings-investor-days/#sustainability-

reports-page. Infratil will release its FY2026 mandatory Climate Risk Disclosure report by 31 July 2026.

The Group reviews its investments against independent external valuation reports to determine whether

there is any indication that those assets have suffered an impairment loss. Independent external valuations

also form the basis for the International Portfolio Incentive Fees paid to Morrison annually. The valuers have

considered the impact of climate change on the investments but have made no explicit adjustments in

respect of climate change matters. However, the Group and valuers anticipate that climate change could

have a greater influence on valuations in the future as investment markets place a greater emphasis on this

topic.

(24) CAPITAL COMMITMENTS

2026

$Millions

2025

$Millions

Group capital commitments

Committed but not contracted for

55.8 31.6

Contracted but not provided for

299.4 226.3

Capital commitments

355.2 257.9

Group capital commitments are primarily associated with RHCNZ Medical Imaging's capital expenditure in

relation to completion costs for new branches and branch expansion, Qscan and One NZ's open capital

expenditure purchase orders and Gurin Energy's expenditure on new battery energy storage systems.

Infratil capital commitments

Capital commitments from Infratil are primarily associated with Infratil’s capital contributions to development

phase subsidiaries and associates. Total committed capital by Infratil and total uncalled commitment to date

is designated in the entity’s local currency.

Local currency

Total

commitment at

31 March 2026

$Millions

Uncalled

commitment at

31 March 2026

$Millions

Uncalled

commitment at

31 March 2026

(NZD) $Millions

Longroad EnergyUSD757.8 338.3 588.6

GalileoEUR114.0 - -

Gurīn EnergyUSD237.5 76.5 133.1

Kao DataGBP355.9 81.3 187.1

Mint Renewables AUD219.0 186.0 223.3

ClearvisionUSD100.0 31.9 55.4

Total 1,187.5

The uncalled commitment at 31 March 2025: $834.5 million. Infratil’s shareholding allows it to control

the timing and quantum of any capital call.

Subsequent to balance date, on 9 April 2026, Infratil committed to an additional €20.0 million in

shareholder loans to Galileo Green Energy.

86
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report

Contents

Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

(25) RECONCILIATION OF NET SURPLUS WITH CASH FLOW FROM

OPERATING ACTIVITIES

2026

$Millions

2025

$Millions

Net surplus for the year574.3(269.8)

(Add)/Less items classified as investing activity:

(Gain)/Loss on investment realisations, impairments and disposals

of discontinued operations

(186.7)81.9

Payables relating to investing activities

0.6 0.1

Add items not involving cash flows:

Movement in financial derivatives taken to the profit or loss

(41.2)69.4

Decrease in deferred tax liability excluding transfers to reserves

(136.5)(53.1)

Changes in fair value of investment properties

10.6 24.9

Equity accounted earnings of associate net of distributions received

(436.8)(458.9)

Depreciation

415.5 453.0

Movement in provision for bad debts

5.9 15.0

Amortisation of intangibles

170.7 171.9

Other

50.937.4

Movements in working capital:

Change in receivables

(82.1)62.7

Change in inventories

10.0 5.9

Change in trade payables

15.6 (68.0)

Change in accruals and other liabilities

(129.8)274.1

Change in current and deferred taxation

(46.0)39.9

Net cash flow from operating activities

195.0 386.4

87
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report

Contents

Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

(26) RECONCILIATION OF CASH FLOW FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES

LiabilitiesEquity

Interest bearing

loans and

borrowings

$Millions

Bonds

$Millions

Lease

liabilities

$Millions

Derivative

financial

instruments

$Millions

Share

Capital

$Millions

Reserves

$Millions

Retained

earnings

$Millions

Non-controlling

interest in

subsidiaries

$Millions

Total

$Millions

Balance as at 1 April 2025(3,187.6)(2,692.2)(1,169.5)(367.1)(3,409.2)(946.2)(2,171.8)(1,553.7)(15,497.3)

Changes from financing cash flows -

Proceeds from issue of shares and shareholder loans - - - - - - - - -

Proceeds from issues of shares to non-controlling interest - - - - - - - (89.6)(89.6)

Bank borrowings(2,592.8) - - - - - - - (2,592.8)

Issue of bonds - (225.0) - - - - - - (225.0)

Repayment of bank debt/commercial paper1,445.9 - - - - - - - 1,445.9

Repayment of lease liabilities - - 91.3 - - - - - 91.3

Lease incentives received - - (42.0) - - - - - (42.0)

Loan establishment costs3.0 - - - - - - - 3.0

Repayment of bonds/PIIB buyback - 211.3 - - - - - - 211.3

Infrastructure bond issue expenses - 1.6 - - - - - - 1.6

Share buyback - - - - - - - - -

Share buyback of non-wholly owned subsidiaries - - - - - - - 108.7 108.7

Dividends paid to non-controlling shareholders in subsidiary companies - - - - - - - 56.9 56.9

Dividends paid to owners of the Company - - - - (63.2) - 201.6 - 138.4

Total changes from financing cash flows(1,143.9)(12.1)49.3 - (63.2) - 201.6 76.0 (892.3)

Changes arising from acquisition or disposal of subsidiaries 129.6 373.5 9.5 87.9 7.2 319.0 (319.0)667.4 1,275.1

The effect of changes in foreign exchange rates(41.2) - (6.9)(1.0) - (352.7) - - (401.8)

Changes in fair value - - - 252.5 - (142.6) - (31.8)78.1

Liability-related -

Lease additions/(disposals) - - (236.1) - - - - - (236.1)

Capitalised borrowing costs0.3 (5.6) - - - - - - (5.3)

Interest expense(0.2) - (87.2) - - - - - (87.4)

Other(14.5) - 115.7 - - - - - 101.2

Total liability-related other changes(14.4)(5.6)(207.6) - - - - - (227.6)

Total equity-related other changes - - - - (298.4)46.2(548.1)(9.8)(810.1)

Balance at 31 March 2026(4,257.5)(2,336.4)(1,325.2)(27.7)(3,763.6)(1,076.3)(2,837.3)(851.9)(16,475.9)

88
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report

Contents

Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

LiabilitiesEquity

Interest bearing

loans and

borrowings

$Millions

Bonds

$Millions

Lease

liabilities

$Millions

Derivative

financial

instruments

$Millions

Share

Capital

$Millions

Reserves

$Millions

Retained

earnings

$Millions

Non-controlling

interest in

subsidiaries

$Millions

Total

$Millions

Balance as at 1 April 2024(3,138.9)(2,569.5)(1,149.4)(149.6)(2,043.9)(811.1)(2,646.3)(1,548.4)(14,057.1)

Changes from financing cash flows -

Proceeds from issue of shares and shareholder loans - - - - (1,258.8) - - - (1,258.8)

Proceeds from issues of shares to non-controlling interest - - - - - - - (38.5)(38.5)

Bank borrowings(2,034.2) - - - - - - - (2,034.2)

Issue of bonds - (250.0) - - - - - - (250.0)

Repayment of bank debt/commercial paper2,007.7 - - - - - - - 2,007.7

Repayment of lease liabilities - - 105.3 - - - - - 105.3

Lease incentives received - - - - - - - - -

Loan establishment costs32.1 - - - - - - - 32.1

Repayment of bonds/PIIB buyback - 140.0 - - - - - - 140.0

Infrastructure bond issue expenses - 4.0 - - - - - - 4.0

Share buyback - - - - - - - - -

Share buyback of non-wholly owned subsidiaries - - - - - - - 45.5 45.5

Dividends paid to non-controlling shareholders in subsidiary companies - - - - - - - 66.3 66.3

Dividends paid to owners of the Company - - - - (56.5) - 178.9 - 122.4

Total changes from financing cash flows5.6 (106.0)105.3 - (1,315.3) - 178.9 73.3 (1,058.2)

Changes arising from acquisition or disposal of subsidiaries - - - - - - - - -

The effect of changes in foreign exchange rates(10.6)(0.3)(1.6)(3.1) - (77.8) - (1.1)(94.5)

Changes in fair value - (13.6) - (231.8) - (124.5) - (89.6)(459.5)

Liability-related -

Lease additions/(disposals) - - (103.8) - - - - - (103.8)

Capitalised borrowing costs(32.4)(2.8) - - - - - - (35.2)

Interest expense(1.8) - (15.6)(0.2) - - - - (17.6)

Other(9.5) - (4.4)17.6 - - - - 3.7

Total liability-related other changes(43.7)(2.8)(123.8)17.4 - - - - (152.9)

Total equity-related other changes - - - - (50.0)67.2 295.6 12.1 324.9

Balance at 31 March 2025(3,187.6)(2,692.2)(1,169.5)(367.1)(3,409.2)(946.2)(2,171.8)(1,553.7)(15,497.3)

89
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report

Contents

Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

(27) KEY MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL DISCLOSURES

Key management personnel have been defined as the Chief Executives and direct reports for the Group’s

operating subsidiaries (including executive Directors).

2026

$Millions

2025

$Millions

Key management personnel remuneration comprised:

Short-term employee benefits

33.4 26.9

Post employment benefits

- -

Termination benefits

1.0 1.3

Other long-term benefits

6.0 8.5

Share based payments

1.2 (0.5)

41.6 36.2

Directors fees paid to directors of Infratil Limited and its subsidiaries during the year were $4.5 million

(2025: $5.0 million).

(28) RELATED PARTIES

Morrison Infrastructure Management Limited ('Morrison') is the management company for the Company

and receives management fees in accordance with the applicable management agreement. Morrison is

owned by H.R.L Morrison & Co Group Limited Partnership, in which Jason Boyes, a director and Chief

Executive of Infratil, has a beneficial interest.

The passive mobile tower assets sold by One NZ to Fortysouth during the year ended 31 March 2023 have

been leased back to One NZ as part of the 20-year master service agreement. Following the One NZ

acquisition, the right-of-use asset and lease liability attributable to agreements with Fortysouth are held on

the Balance Sheet at $778.3 million and $827.0 million, respectively. Additionally, interest expense was

$66.5 million and right-of-use asset depreciation was $45.9 million for the 12 months to 31 March 2026

within the Statement of Comprehensive Income. The Group’s share of the operating revenue for Fortysouth

is included within share of associate earnings line in the Statement of Comprehensive Income. Infratil has

deemed that any unrealised gains or losses for transactions between One NZ and Fortysouth are not

material and will not be eliminated.

There are other related party transactions between companies within the Group. These are carried out in the

ordinary course of business at the appropriate market rate. The arrangements are not deemed material for

separate disclosure.

Management and other fees paid by the Group (including associates) to Mo

rrison or its related

parties during the year were:

Note

2026

$Millions

2025

$Millions

Management fees29 101.4 456.2

Executive secondment and consulting0.6 0.1

Directors’ fees2.0 2.8

Directors' fees rebate(1.7) -

Financial management, accounting, treasury,

compliance and administrative services0.2 1.6

Other0.9 0.2

Total management and other fees103.4 460.9

As at 31 March 2026 $0.1 million included in the above table related to discontinued operations

(2025: $0.3 million).

At 31 March 2026 amounts owing to Morrison of $10.8 million (excluding GST) are included in trade

creditors (2025: $9.1 million).

Morrison, or Employees of Morrison received directors fees from the Company, subsidiaries or

associates as follows:

2026

$000’s

2025

$000’s

CDC354.2 309.1

Galileo 414.4 380.5

Gurīn Energy383.2 380.7

Infratil Infrastructure Property30.0 15.0

Longroad Energy 255.4 287.6

RHCNZ Medical Imaging100.0 120.0

Manawa Energy 83.4 310.0

Mint Renewables - 203.6

RetireAustralia - 341.0

Wellington International Airport342.7 463.5

1,963.3 2,811.0

A loan has been provided to the co-investor of Gurīn Energy. Given this entity represents the key

management personnel of Gurīn Energy, it has been identified as a related party loan. The loan balance at

31 March 2026 is $18.5 million (31 March 2025: $11.5 million) and is included within trade and other

receivables at 31 March 2026.

90
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report

Contents

Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

(29) MANAGEMENT FEES PAID UNDER THE MANAGEMENT

AGREEMENT WITH MORRISON INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEMENT

LIMITED

The day-to-day management responsibilities of the Company have been delegated to Morrison

Infrastructure Management Limited (’Morrison’) under a Management Agreement. The Management

Agreement specifies the duties and powers of Morrison, and the management fees payable to Morrison for

delivering those services. These include a New Zealand Portfolio Management Fee, International Portfolio

Management Fee and International Portfolio Incentive Fees.

Management fees paid under the Management Agreement during the year were:

2026

$Millions

2025

$Millions

New Zealand & International Portfolio Management Fees122.6 109.3

International Portfolio Incentive Fees

(21.2)346.9

101.4 456.2

New Zealand Portfolio Management Fee

The New Zealand base management fee is paid on the 'New Zealand Company Value' at 0.80% p.a. on

the New Zealand Company Value above $150 million, 1.00% p.a. on the New Zealand Company Value

between $50 million and $150 million and 1.125% p.a. on New Zealand Company value up to $50 million.

The New Zealand Company Value is defined as:

• the Company's market capitalisation as defined in the Management Agreement (the aggregated market

value of the Company's listed securities, being ordinary shares, partly paid shares and, Infratil

Infrastructure bonds);

• plus the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries' net debt (excluding listed debt securities and the

book value of the debt in any non-Australasian investments);

• minus the cost price of any non-Australasian investments; and,

• an adjustment for foreign exchange gains or losses related to non-New Zealand investments.

International Portfolio Management Fee

The international fund management fee is paid at the rate of 1.50% per annum on:

• the cost price of any non-Australasian investments; and,

• the book value of the debt in any wholly owned non-Australasian investments.

International Portfolio Incentive Fee

International Investments are eligible for International Portfolio incentive fees (‘Incentive fees’) under the

Management Agreement between Morrison and Infratil. The Agreement allows for incentives to be payable

for performance in excess of a minimum hurdle of 12% per annum in three separate areas:

• Initial Incentive Fees;

• Annual Incentive Fees; and,

• Realised Incentive Fees.

To the extent that there are assets that meet these criterion, independent valuations are performed on the

respective International Investments to determine whether any Incentive Fees are payable.

International Portfolio Initial Incentive Fee

International Investments become eligible for the Initial Incentive Fee assessment on the third balance

date (31 March) that they have been held continuously by the Company. All International Investments

that are acquired in any one financial year are grouped together for the purposes of the Initial Incentive

Fee, and an Initial Incentive Fee is payable at 20% of the outperformance of those assets against a

benchmark of 12% p.a. after tax, compounding.

There are no International Portfolio Initial Incentive Fee assessments as at 31 March 2026 (31 March 2025:

($0.5) million from Mint Renewables).

International Portfolio Annual Incentive Fee

Thereafter International Investments are grouped together, and an Annual Incentive Fee is payable at 20% of

the outperformance of those assets against the higher of, a benchmark of 12% p.a. after tax, relative to the

most recent 31 March valuation, or cost.

The Company’s investments in CDC, Galileo, Gurīn Energy, Kao Data, Longroad Energy, Mint Renewables

and Qscan Group are eligible for the International Portfolio Annual Incentive fee assessment as at 31 March

2026 (31 March 2025: CDC, Galileo, Gurīn Energy, Kao Data, Longroad Energy, RetireAustralia and Qscan).

Based on independent valuations obtained as at 31 March 2026, no Annual Incentive Fee was accrued

(31 March 2025: $347.4 million).

International Portfolio Annual and Initial Incentive Fees

2026

$Millions

2025

$Millions

CDC - 359.9

Galileo - 2.4

Gurīn Energy - 29.9

Kao Data - (3.5)

Longroad Energy - (25.2)

Qscan - 3.7

RetireAustralia - (19.8)

Mint Renewables - (0.5)

- 346.9

Payment of Annual Incentive Fees

Any Annual Incentive Fee calculated in respect of a Financial Year is earned and paid in three annual

instalments, with the second and third instalments being scaled down if the fair value of the relevant asset

(including distributions, if any) is less than fair value or cost as at the 31 March for which the Incentive Fee

was first calculated.

91
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report

Contents

Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

International Portfolio Realised Incentive Fee

Realised Incentive Fees are payable on the realised gains from the sale, or other realisation of International

Investments at 20% of the outperformance (since the last valuation date) against the higher of, a benchmark

of 12% p.a. after tax, relative to the most recent 31 March valuation, or cost.

As at 31 March 2026, the International Portfolio realised incentive fee was negative $21.2 million as a result

of the transaction price of the RetireAustralia sale. The realised negative fee will be offset against Tranche 2

of the FY2025 annual incentive fee payment (31 March 2025: nil).

(30) CONTINGENT LIABILITIES

The Company and certain wholly owned subsidiaries are guarantors of the bank debt facilities of Infratil

Finance Limited under a Deed of Negative Pledge, Guarantee and Subordination and the Company is a

guarantor to certain obligations of subsidiary companies.

(31) EVENTS AFTER BALANCE DATE

Dividend

On 25 May 2026, the Directors approved an unimputed final dividend of 13.65 cents per share to holders of

fully paid ordinary shares to be paid on 29 June 2026.

Fortysouth

As outlined in Note 9.4, the sale of Fortysouth was announced on 10 November 2025, with completion

subject to the Overseas Investment Office approval. Accordingly, the investment in Fortysouth was classified

as held for sale as at 31 March 2026. The sale completed on 10 April 2026, with final sale proceeds of

$217.1 million received on that date. Infratil will recognise the disposal of the investment on completion,

with sale proceeds (net of transaction costs) in excess of the carrying value recognised as a gain on sale,

expected to be approximately $40.0 million which will be recognised in the year ended 31 March 2027.

Infratil Finance Limited Refinancing

Subsequent to 31 March 2026, Infratil Finance Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company,

completed a refinancing of its core bank debt facilities as part of a broader reset of the Group’s debt

platform.

Under the refinancing, total committed bank facilities increased from those balance outlined in Note 19

to approximately $2.1 billion, comprising approximately $1.6 billion of syndicated bank facilities and

$0.5 billion of bilateral facilities.

The new facilities introduce a more flexible covenant and legal structure consistent with the Group’s

investment grade credit profile and extend the Group’s debt maturity profile through a combination of 1-year

(plus 1-year extension), 3-year and 5-year tenors across facilities denominated in NZD, AUD and USD.

This refinancing is a non-adjusting event after the reporting period and does not result in any adjustment to

the amounts recognised in the financial statements at 31 March 2026.

Reduction in Contact stake

On 20 May 2026, Infratil Limited announced that it had agreed to sell 53,531,358 ordinary shares in Contact

Energy Limited (“Contact"), representing approximately 5.0% of Contact’s issued share capital, via a fully

underwritten block trade. The shares are to be sold at $9.25 per share, generating expected gross proceeds

of approximately $495 million. Settlement of the transaction is expected to occur on 25 May 2026 with no

significant revaluation expected to be recognised in OCI. Following completion of the transaction, Infratil’s

shareholding in Contact is expected to reduce to approximately 9.08%.

92
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report

Contents

Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory




© 2025 KPMG, a New Zealand Partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organization of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited,

a private English company limited by guarantee. All rights reserved.


Document classification: KPMG Confidential


Independent Auditor’s Report

To the shareholders of Infratil Limited (G roup)

Report on the audit of the consolidated financial statements

Opinion

We have audited the accompanying consolidated

financial statements which comprise:

­ the consolidated statement of financial position as

at 31 March 2025;

­ the consolidated statements of comprehensive

income, changes in equity and cash flows for the

year then ended; and

­ notes, including material accounting policy

information and other explanatory information.


In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated

financial statements of Infratil Limited (the Company)

and its subsidiaries (the Group) on pages 54 to 118

present fairly in all material respects:

­ the Group’s financial position as at 31 March

2025 and its financial performance and cash

flows for the year ended on that date;

­ In accordance with New Zealand Equivalents to

International Financial Reporting Standards (NZ

IFRS) issued by the New Zealand Accounting

Standards Board and the International Financial

Reporting Standards issued by the International

Accounting Standards Board.



Basis for opinion

We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (New Zealand) (ISAs (NZ)). We

believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.

We are independent of Infratil Limited in accordance with Professional and Ethical Standard 1 International Code

of Ethics for Assurance Practitioners (Including International Independence Standards) (New Zealand) issued by

the New Zealand Auditing and Assurance Standards Board and the International Ethics Standards Board for

Accountants’ International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (including International Independence

Standards) (IESBA Code), as applicable to audits of financial statements of public interest entities. We have also

fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with Professional and Ethical Standards 1 and the IESBA

Code.

Our responsibilities under ISAs (NZ)(Revised) are further described in the Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit

of the consolidated financial statements section of our report.

Our firm has also provided other services to the Group in relation to climate related assurance, taxation services,

audit of regulatory disclosures and other assurance and advisory engagements. Subject to certain restrictions,

partners and employees of our firm may also deal with the Group on normal terms within the ordinary course of

trading activities of the business of the Group. These matters have not impaired our independence as auditor of

the Group. The firm has no other relationship with, or interest in, the Group.


Scoping




© 2025 KPMG, a New Zealand Partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organization of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited,

a private English company limited by guarantee. All rights reserved.


Document classification: KPMG Confidential


Independent Auditor’s Report

To the shareholders of Infratil Limited (G roup)

Report on the audit of the consolidated financial statements

Opinion

We have audited the accompanying consolidated

financial statements which comprise:

­ the consolidated statement of financial position as

at 31 March 2025;

­ the consolidated statements of comprehensive

income, changes in equity and cash flows for the

year then ended; and

­ notes, including material accounting policy

information and other explanatory information.


In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated

financial statements of Infratil Limited (the Company)

and its subsidiaries (the Group) on pages 54 to 118

present fairly in all material respects:

­ the Group’s financial position as at 31 March

2025 and its financial performance and cash

flows for the year ended on that date;

­ In accordance with New Zealand Equivalents to

International Financial Reporting Standards (NZ

IFRS) issued by the New Zealand Accounting

Standards Board and the International Financial

Reporting Standards issued by the International

Accounting Standards Board.



Basis for opinion

We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (New Zealand) (ISAs (NZ)). We

believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.

We are independent of Infratil Limited in accordance with Professional and Ethical Standard 1 International Code

of Ethics for Assurance Practitioners (Including International Independence Standards) (New Zealand) issued by

the New Zealand Auditing and Assurance Standards Board and the International Ethics Standards Board for

Accountants’ International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (including International Independence

Standards) (IESBA Code), as applicable to audits of financial statements of public interest entities. We have also

fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with Professional and Ethical Standards 1 and the IESBA

Code.

Our responsibilities under ISAs (NZ)(Revised) are further described in the Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit

of the consolidated financial statements section of our report.

Our firm has also provided other services to the Group in relation to climate related assurance, taxation services,

audit of regulatory disclosures and other assurance and advisory engagements. Subject to certain restrictions,

partners and employees of our firm may also deal with the Group on normal terms within the ordinary course of

trading activities of the business of the Group. These matters have not impaired our independence as auditor of

the Group. The firm has no other relationship with, or interest in, the Group.


Scoping




© 2025 KPMG, a New Zealand Partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organization of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited,

a private English company limited by guarantee. All rights reserved.


Document classification: KPMG Confidential


Independent Auditor’s Report

To the shareholders of Infratil Limited (G roup)

Report on the audit of the consolidated financial statements

Opinion

We have audited the accompanying consolidated

financial statements which comprise:

­ the consolidated statement of financial position as

at 31 March 2025;

­ the consolidated statements of comprehensive

income, changes in equity and cash flows for the

year then ended; and

­ notes, including material accounting policy

information and other explanatory information.


In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated

financial statements of Infratil Limited (the Company)

and its subsidiaries (the Group) on pages 54 to 118

present fairly in all material respects:

­ the Group’s financial position as at 31 March

2025 and its financial performance and cash

flows for the year ended on that date;

­ In accordance with New Zealand Equivalents to

International Financial Reporting Standards (NZ

IFRS) issued by the New Zealand Accounting

Standards Board and the International Financial

Reporting Standards issued by the International

Accounting Standards Board.



Basis for opinion

We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (New Zealand) (ISAs (NZ)). We

believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.

We are independent of Infratil Limited in accordance with Professional and Ethical Standard 1 International Code

of Ethics for Assurance Practitioners (Including International Independence Standards) (New Zealand) issued by

the New Zealand Auditing and Assurance Standards Board and the International Ethics Standards Board for

Accountants’ International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (including International Independence

Standards) (IESBA Code), as applicable to audits of financial statements of public interest entities. We have also

fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with Professional and Ethical Standards 1 and the IESBA

Code.

Our responsibilities under ISAs (NZ)(Revised) are further described in the Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit

of the consolidated financial statements section of our report.

Our firm has also provided other services to the Group in relation to climate related assurance, taxation services,

audit of regulatory disclosures and other assurance and advisory engagements. Subject to certain restrictions,

partners and employees of our firm may also deal with the Group on normal terms within the ordinary course of

trading activities of the business of the Group. These matters have not impaired our independence as auditor of

the Group. The firm has no other relationship with, or interest in, the Group.


Scoping

To the shareholders of Infratil Limited

Report on the audit of the consolidated financial statements

Opinion

We have audited the accompanying consolidated financial statements which

comprise:

– the consolidated statement of financial position as at 31 March 2026;

– the consolidated statements of comprehensive income, changes in equity and

cash flows for the year then ended; and

– notes, including material accounting policy information and other explanatory

information.

In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated financial statements of Infratil Limited

(the Company) and its subsidiaries (the Group) on pages 33 to 91 present fairly in all

material respects:

– the Group’s financial position as at 31 March 2026 and its financial performance

and cash flows for the year ended on that date;

In accordance with New Zealand Equivalents to International Financial Reporting

Standards (NZ IFRS) issued by the New Zealand Accounting Standards Board and

the International Financial Reporting Standards issued by the International

Accounting Standards Board.

We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (New Zealand)

(ISAs (NZ)). We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate

to provide a basis for our opinion.

We are independent of Infratil Limited in accordance with Professional and Ethical Standard 1

International Code of Ethics for Assurance Practitioners (Including International Independence

Standards) (New Zealand) issued by the New Zealand Auditing and Assurance Standards Board

and the International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants’ International Code of Ethics for

Professional Accountants (including International Independence Standards) (IESBA Code), as

applicable to audits of financial statements of public interest entities. We have also fulfilled our

other ethical responsibilities in accordance with Professional and Ethical Standards 1 and the

IESBA Code.

Our responsibilities under ISAs (NZ) are further described in the

Auditor’s responsibilities for the

audit of the consolidated financial statements

section of our report.

Our firm has also provided other services to the Group in relation to climate related assurance,

taxation services, audit of regulatory disclosures, other assurance and advisory engagements.

Subject to certain restrictions, partners and employees of our firm may also deal with the Group

on normal terms within the ordinary course of trading activities of the business of the Group.

These matters have not impaired our independence as auditor of the Group. The firm has no

other relationship with, or interest in, the Group.




© 2025 KPMG, a New Zealand Partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organization of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited,

a private English company limited by guarantee. All rights reserved.


Document classification: KPMG Confidential


Independent Auditor’s Report

To the shareholders of Infratil Limited (G roup)

Report on the audit of the consolidated financial statements

Opinion

We have audited the accompanying consolidated

financial statements which comprise:

­ the consolidated statement of financial position as

at 31 March 2025;

­ the consolidated statements of comprehensive

income, changes in equity and cash flows for the

year then ended; and

­ notes, including material accounting policy

information and other explanatory information.


In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated

financial statements of Infratil Limited (the Company)

and its subsidiaries (the Group) on pages 54 to 118

present fairly in all material respects:

­ the Group’s financial position as at 31 March

2025 and its financial performance and cash

flows for the year ended on that date;

­ In accordance with New Zealand Equivalents to

International Financial Reporting Standards (NZ

IFRS) issued by the New Zealand Accounting

Standards Board and the International Financial

Reporting Standards issued by the International

Accounting Standards Board.



Basis for opinion

We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (New Zealand) (ISAs (NZ)). We

believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.

We are independent of Infratil Limited in accordance with Professional and Ethical Standard 1 International Code

of Ethics for Assurance Practitioners (Including International Independence Standards) (New Zealand) issued by

the New Zealand Auditing and Assurance Standards Board and the International Ethics Standards Board for

Accountants’ International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (including International Independence

Standards) (IESBA Code), as applicable to audits of financial statements of public interest entities. We have also

fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with Professional and Ethical Standards 1 and the IESBA

Code.

Our responsibilities under ISAs (NZ)(Revised) are further described in the Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit

of the consolidated financial statements section of our report.

Our firm has also provided other services to the Group in relation to climate related assurance, taxation services,

audit of regulatory disclosures and other assurance and advisory engagements. Subject to certain restrictions,

partners and employees of our firm may also deal with the Group on normal terms within the ordinary course of

trading activities of the business of the Group. These matters have not impaired our independence as auditor of

the Group. The firm has no other relationship with, or interest in, the Group.


Scoping




© 2025 KPMG, a New Zealand Partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organization of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited,

a private English company limited by guarantee. All rights reserved.


Document classification: KPMG Confidential


Independent Auditor’s Report

To the shareholders of Infratil Limited (G roup)

Report on the audit of the consolidated financial statements

Opinion

We have audited the accompanying consolidated

financial statements which comprise:

­ the consolidated statement of financial position as

at 31 March 2025;

­ the consolidated statements of comprehensive

income, changes in equity and cash flows for the

year then ended; and

­ notes, including material accounting policy

information and other explanatory information.


In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated

financial statements of Infratil Limited (the Company)

and its subsidiaries (the Group) on pages 54 to 118

present fairly in all material respects:

­ the Group’s financial position as at 31 March

2025 and its financial performance and cash

flows for the year ended on that date;

­ In accordance with New Zealand Equivalents to

International Financial Reporting Standards (NZ

IFRS) issued by the New Zealand Accounting

Standards Board and the International Financial

Reporting Standards issued by the International

Accounting Standards Board.



Basis for opinion

We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (New Zealand) (ISAs (NZ)). We

believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.

We are independent of Infratil Limited in accordance with Professional and Ethical Standard 1 International Code

of Ethics for Assurance Practitioners (Including International Independence Standards) (New Zealand) issued by

the New Zealand Auditing and Assurance Standards Board and the International Ethics Standards Board for

Accountants’ International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (including International Independence

Standards) (IESBA Code), as applicable to audits of financial statements of public interest entities. We have also

fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with Professional and Ethical Standards 1 and the IESBA

Code.

Our responsibilities under ISAs (NZ)(Revised) are further described in the Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit

of the consolidated financial statements section of our report.

Our firm has also provided other services to the Group in relation to climate related assurance, taxation services,

audit of regulatory disclosures and other assurance and advisory engagements. Subject to certain restrictions,

partners and employees of our firm may also deal with the Group on normal terms within the ordinary course of

trading activities of the business of the Group. These matters have not impaired our independence as auditor of

the Group. The firm has no other relationship with, or interest in, the Group.


Scoping

© 2026 KPMG, a New Zealand Partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a private English company limited by guarantee. All rights reserved.

Document classification: KPMG Confidential

93
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report

Contents

Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory




© 2025 KPMG, a New Zealand Partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organization of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited,

a private English company limited by guarantee. All rights reserved.


Document classification: KPMG Confidential


Independent Auditor’s Report

To the shareholders of Infratil Limited (G roup)

Report on the audit of the consolidated financial statements

Opinion

We have audited the accompanying consolidated

financial statements which comprise:

­ the consolidated statement of financial position as

at 31 March 2025;

­ the consolidated statements of comprehensive

income, changes in equity and cash flows for the

year then ended; and

­ notes, including material accounting policy

information and other explanatory information.


In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated

financial statements of Infratil Limited (the Company)

and its subsidiaries (the Group) on pages 54 to 118

present fairly in all material respects:

­ the Group’s financial position as at 31 March

2025 and its financial performance and cash

flows for the year ended on that date;

­ In accordance with New Zealand Equivalents to

International Financial Reporting Standards (NZ

IFRS) issued by the New Zealand Accounting

Standards Board and the International Financial

Reporting Standards issued by the International

Accounting Standards Board.



Basis for opinion

We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (New Zealand) (ISAs (NZ)). We

believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.

We are independent of Infratil Limited in accordance with Professional and Ethical Standard 1 International Code

of Ethics for Assurance Practitioners (Including International Independence Standards) (New Zealand) issued by

the New Zealand Auditing and Assurance Standards Board and the International Ethics Standards Board for

Accountants’ International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (including International Independence

Standards) (IESBA Code), as applicable to audits of financial statements of public interest entities. We have also

fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with Professional and Ethical Standards 1 and the IESBA

Code.

Our responsibilities under ISAs (NZ)(Revised) are further described in the Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit

of the consolidated financial statements section of our report.

Our firm has also provided other services to the Group in relation to climate related assurance, taxation services,

audit of regulatory disclosures and other assurance and advisory engagements. Subject to certain restrictions,

partners and employees of our firm may also deal with the Group on normal terms within the ordinary course of

trading activities of the business of the Group. These matters have not impaired our independence as auditor of

the Group. The firm has no other relationship with, or interest in, the Group.


Scoping

The scope of our audit is designed to ensure that we perform adequate work to be able to give

an opinion on the consolidated financial statements as a whole, taking into account the structure

of the Group, the financial reporting systems, processes and controls, and the industry in which

it operates.

The context of our audit is set by the Group’s major activities in the financial year ended

31 March 2026. In establishing the overall approach to the Group audit, we determined the type

of work that needed to be performed at the component level by us, as the Group engagement

team, or component auditors operating under our instruction.

A full scope audit was performed on the most significant investments for the Group using

component materialities which were lower than Group materiality. The component materiality

considered the size and the risk profile of each component.

Where the work was performed by component auditors, we determined the level of involvement

we needed to have in the audit work at those investments to be able to conclude whether

sufficient appropriate audit evidence had been obtained as a basis for our opinion on the Group

financial statements as a whole. We kept in regular communication with component audit teams

throughout the year with phone calls, discussions and written instructions and ensured that the

component audit teams had the appropriate skills and competencies which are needed for the

audit. We reviewed the work undertaken by component auditors in order to ensure the quality

and adequacy of their work.






2


The scope of our audit is designed to ensure that we perform adequate work to be able to give an opinion on the

consolidated financial statements as a whole, taking into account the structure of the Group, the financial

reporting systems, processes and controls, and the industry in which it operates.

The context of our audit is set by the Group’s major activities in the financial year ended 31 March 2025. In

establishing the overall approach to the Group audit, we determined the type of work that needed to be

performed at the component level by us, as the Group engagement team, or component auditors operating under

our instruction.

A full scope audit was performed on the most significant investments for the Group using component materialities

which were lower than Group materiality. The component materiality considered the size and the risk profile of

each component.

Where the work was performed by component auditors, we determined the level of involvement we needed to

have in the audit work at those investments to be able to conclude whether sufficient appropriate audit evidence

had been obtained as a basis for our opinion on the Group financial statements as a whole. We kept in regular

communication with component audit teams throughout the year with phone calls, discussions and written

instructions and ensured that the component audit teams had the appropriate skills and competencies which are

needed for the audit. We reviewed the work undertaken by component auditors in order to ensure the quality and

adequacy of their work.


Materiality

The scope of our audit was influenced by our application of materiality. Materiality helped us to determine the

nature, timing and extent of our audit procedures and to evaluate the effect of misstatements, both individually

and on the consolidated financial statements as a whole. The materiality for the consolidated financial statements

as a whole was set at $120 million, determined with reference to a benchmark of the Group’s total assets. We

chose the benchmark because, in our view, this is a key measure of the Group’s performance.



Key audit matters

Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgement, were of most significance in our audit of

the consolidated financial statements in the current period. We summarise below those matters and our key audit

procedures to address those matters in order that the shareholders as a body may better understand the process

by which we arrived at our audit opinion.

Our procedures were undertaken in the context of and solely for the purpose of our audit opinion on the

consolidated financial statements as a whole and we do not express discrete opinions on separate elements of

the consolidated financial statements.

The key audit matter How the matter was addressed in our audit

Carrying value of goodwill

As disclosed in note 16, the carrying value of the

Group’s goodwill as at 31 March 2025 was $4.7

billion. Key goodwill balances relate to One NZ,

$2.9 billion, RHCNZ Group, $1.1 billion, and

Qscan Group, $0.7 billion.

The goodwill is tested for impairment using

discounted cash flow models, which include a

range of judgemental assumptions about the

Our audit procedures over the goodwill included:

­ Assessing the appropriateness of the CGUs

determined;

­ Comparing the methodology adopted in the valuation

models to accepted valuation approaches;






2


The scope of our audit is designed to ensure that we perform adequate work to be able to give an opinion on the

consolidated financial statements as a whole, taking into account the structure of the Group, the financial

reporting systems, processes and controls, and the industry in which it operates.

The context of our audit is set by the Group’s major activities in the financial year ended 31 March 2025. In

establishing the overall approach to the Group audit, we determined the type of work that needed to be

performed at the component level by us, as the Group engagement team, or component auditors operating under

our instruction.

A full scope audit was performed on the most significant investments for the Group using component materialities

which were lower than Group materiality. The component materiality considered the size and the risk profile of

each component.

Where the work was performed by component auditors, we determined the level of involvement we needed to

have in the audit work at those investments to be able to conclude whether sufficient appropriate audit evidence

had been obtained as a basis for our opinion on the Group financial statements as a whole. We kept in regular

communication with component audit teams throughout the year with phone calls, discussions and written

instructions and ensured that the component audit teams had the appropriate skills and competencies which are

needed for the audit. We reviewed the work undertaken by component auditors in order to ensure the quality and

adequacy of their work.



Materiality

The scope of our audit was influenced by our application of materiality. Materiality helped us to determine the

nature, timing and extent of our audit procedures and to evaluate the effect of misstatements, both individually

and on the consolidated financial statements as a whole. The materiality for the consolidated financial statements

as a whole was set at $120 million, determined with reference to a benchmark of the Group’s total assets. We

chose the benchmark because, in our view, this is a key measure of the Group’s performance.


Key audit matters

Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgement, were of most significance in our audit of

the consolidated financial statements in the current period. We summarise below those matters and our key audit

procedures to address those matters in order that the shareholders as a body may better understand the process

by which we arrived at our audit opinion.

Our procedures were undertaken in the context of and solely for the purpose of our audit opinion on the

consolidated financial statements as a whole and we do not express discrete opinions on separate elements of

the consolidated financial statements.

The key audit matter How the matter was addressed in our audit

Carrying value of goodwill

As disclosed in note 16, the carrying value of the

Group’s goodwill as at 31 March 2025 was $4.7

billion. Key goodwill balances relate to One NZ,

$2.9 billion, RHCNZ Group, $1.1 billion, and

Qscan Group, $0.7 billion.

The goodwill is tested for impairment using

discounted cash flow models, which include a

range of judgemental assumptions about the

Our audit procedures over the goodwill included:

­ Assessing the appropriateness of the CGUs

determined;

­ Comparing the methodology adopted in the valuation

models to accepted valuation approaches;

The scope of our audit was influenced by our application of materiality. Materiality helped us

to determine the nature, timing and extent of our audit procedures and to evaluate the effect

of misstatements, both individually and on the consolidated financial statements as a whole.

The materiality for the consolidated financial statements as a whole was set at $130 million,

determined with reference to a benchmark of the Group’s total assets. We chose the benchmark

because, in our view, this is a key measure of the Group’s performance.

Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgement, were of most

significance in our audit of the consolidated financial statements in the current period. We

summarise below those matters and our key audit procedures to address those matters in order

that the shareholders as a body may better understand the process by which we arrived at our

audit opinion.

Our procedures were undertaken in the context of and solely for the purpose of our audit opinion

on the consolidated financial statements as a whole and we do not express discrete opinions on

separate elements of the consolidated financial statements.




© 2025 KPMG, a New Zealand Partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organization of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited,

a private English company limited by guarantee. All rights reserved.


Document classification: KPMG Confidential


Independent Auditor’s Report

To the shareholders of Infratil Limited (G roup)

Report on the audit of the consolidated financial statements

Opinion

We have audited the accompanying consolidated

financial statements which comprise:

­ the consolidated statement of financial position as

at 31 March 2025;

­ the consolidated statements of comprehensive

income, changes in equity and cash flows for the

year then ended; and

­ notes, including material accounting policy

information and other explanatory information.


In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated

financial statements of Infratil Limited (the Company)

and its subsidiaries (the Group) on pages 54 to 118

present fairly in all material respects:

­ the Group’s financial position as at 31 March

2025 and its financial performance and cash

flows for the year ended on that date;

­ In accordance with New Zealand Equivalents to

International Financial Reporting Standards (NZ

IFRS) issued by the New Zealand Accounting

Standards Board and the International Financial

Reporting Standards issued by the International

Accounting Standards Board.



Basis for opinion

We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (New Zealand) (ISAs (NZ)). We

believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.

We are independent of Infratil Limited in accordance with Professional and Ethical Standard 1 International Code

of Ethics for Assurance Practitioners (Including International Independence Standards) (New Zealand) issued by

the New Zealand Auditing and Assurance Standards Board and the International Ethics Standards Board for

Accountants’ International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (including International Independence

Standards) (IESBA Code), as applicable to audits of financial statements of public interest entities. We have also

fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with Professional and Ethical Standards 1 and the IESBA

Code.

Our responsibilities under ISAs (NZ)(Revised) are further described in the Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit

of the consolidated financial statements section of our report.

Our firm has also provided other services to the Group in relation to climate related assurance, taxation services,

audit of regulatory disclosures and other assurance and advisory engagements. Subject to certain restrictions,

partners and employees of our firm may also deal with the Group on normal terms within the ordinary course of

trading activities of the business of the Group. These matters have not impaired our independence as auditor of

the Group. The firm has no other relationship with, or interest in, the Group.


Scoping

94
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report

Contents

Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory




© 2025 KPMG, a New Zealand Partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organization of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited,

a private English company limited by guarantee. All rights reserved.


Document classification: KPMG Confidential


Independent Auditor’s Report

To the shareholders of Infratil Limited (G roup)

Report on the audit of the consolidated financial statements

Opinion

We have audited the accompanying consolidated

financial statements which comprise:

­ the consolidated statement of financial position as

at 31 March 2025;

­ the consolidated statements of comprehensive

income, changes in equity and cash flows for the

year then ended; and

­ notes, including material accounting policy

information and other explanatory information.


In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated

financial statements of Infratil Limited (the Company)

and its subsidiaries (the Group) on pages 54 to 118

present fairly in all material respects:

­ the Group’s financial position as at 31 March

2025 and its financial performance and cash

flows for the year ended on that date;

­ In accordance with New Zealand Equivalents to

International Financial Reporting Standards (NZ

IFRS) issued by the New Zealand Accounting

Standards Board and the International Financial

Reporting Standards issued by the International

Accounting Standards Board.



Basis for opinion

We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (New Zealand) (ISAs (NZ)). We

believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.

We are independent of Infratil Limited in accordance with Professional and Ethical Standard 1 International Code

of Ethics for Assurance Practitioners (Including International Independence Standards) (New Zealand) issued by

the New Zealand Auditing and Assurance Standards Board and the International Ethics Standards Board for

Accountants’ International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (including International Independence

Standards) (IESBA Code), as applicable to audits of financial statements of public interest entities. We have also

fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with Professional and Ethical Standards 1 and the IESBA

Code.

Our responsibilities under ISAs (NZ)(Revised) are further described in the Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit

of the consolidated financial statements section of our report.

Our firm has also provided other services to the Group in relation to climate related assurance, taxation services,

audit of regulatory disclosures and other assurance and advisory engagements. Subject to certain restrictions,

partners and employees of our firm may also deal with the Group on normal terms within the ordinary course of

trading activities of the business of the Group. These matters have not impaired our independence as auditor of

the Group. The firm has no other relationship with, or interest in, the Group.


Scoping






2


The scope of our audit is designed to ensure that we perform adequate work to be able to give an opinion on the

consolidated financial statements as a whole, taking into account the structure of the Group, the financial

reporting systems, processes and controls, and the industry in which it operates.

The context of our audit is set by the Group’s major activities in the financial year ended 31 March 2025. In

establishing the overall approach to the Group audit, we determined the type of work that needed to be

performed at the component level by us, as the Group engagement team, or component auditors operating under

our instruction.

A full scope audit was performed on the most significant investments for the Group using component materialities

which were lower than Group materiality. The component materiality considered the size and the risk profile of

each component.

Where the work was performed by component auditors, we determined the level of involvement we needed to

have in the audit work at those investments to be able to conclude whether sufficient appropriate audit evidence

had been obtained as a basis for our opinion on the Group financial statements as a whole. We kept in regular

communication with component audit teams throughout the year with phone calls, discussions and written

instructions and ensured that the component audit teams had the appropriate skills and competencies which are

needed for the audit. We reviewed the work undertaken by component auditors in order to ensure the quality and

adequacy of their work.



Materiality

The scope of our audit was influenced by our application of materiality. Materiality helped us to determine the

nature, timing and extent of our audit procedures and to evaluate the effect of misstatements, both individually

and on the consolidated financial statements as a whole. The materiality for the consolidated financial statements

as a whole was set at $120 million, determined with reference to a benchmark of the Group’s total assets. We

chose the benchmark because, in our view, this is a key measure of the Group’s performance.



Key audit matters

Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgement, were of most significance in our audit of

the consolidated financial statements in the current period. We summarise below those matters and our key audit

procedures to address those matters in order that the shareholders as a body may better understand the process

by which we arrived at our audit opinion.

Our procedures were undertaken in the context of and solely for the purpose of our audit opinion on the

consolidated financial statements as a whole and we do not express discrete opinions on separate elements of

the consolidated financial statements.

The key audit matter How the matter was addressed in our audit

Carrying value of goodwill

As disclosed in note 16, the carrying value of the

Group’s goodwill as at 31 March 2025 was $4.7

billion. Key goodwill balances relate to One NZ,

$2.9 billion, RHCNZ Group, $1.1 billion, and

Qscan Group, $0.7 billion.

The goodwill is tested for impairment using

discounted cash flow models, which include a

range of judgemental assumptions about the

Our audit procedures over the goodwill included:

­ Assessing the appropriateness of the CGUs

determined;

­ Comparing the methodology adopted in the valuation

models to accepted valuation approaches;






2


The scope of our audit is designed to ensure that we perform adequate work to be able to give an opinion on the

consolidated financial statements as a whole, taking into account the structure of the Group, the financial

reporting systems, processes and controls, and the industry in which it operates.

The context of our audit is set by the Group’s major activities in the financial year ended 31 March 2025. In

establishing the overall approach to the Group audit, we determined the type of work that needed to be

performed at the component level by us, as the Group engagement team, or component auditors operating under

our instruction.

A full scope audit was performed on the most significant investments for the Group using component materialities

which were lower than Group materiality. The component materiality considered the size and the risk profile of

each component.

Where the work was performed by component auditors, we determined the level of involvement we needed to

have in the audit work at those investments to be able to conclude whether sufficient appropriate audit evidence

had been obtained as a basis for our opinion on the Group financial statements as a whole. We kept in regular

communication with component audit teams throughout the year with phone calls, discussions and written

instructions and ensured that the component audit teams had the appropriate skills and competencies which are

needed for the audit. We reviewed the work undertaken by component auditors in order to ensure the quality and

adequacy of their work.



Materiality

The scope of our audit was influenced by our application of materiality. Materiality helped us to determine the

nature, timing and extent of our audit procedures and to evaluate the effect of misstatements, both individually

and on the consolidated financial statements as a whole. The materiality for the consolidated financial statements

as a whole was set at $120 million, determined with reference to a benchmark of the Group’s total assets. We

chose the benchmark because, in our view, this is a key measure of the Group’s performance.



Key audit matters

Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgement, were of most significance in our audit of

the consolidated financial statements in the current period. We summarise below those matters and our key audit

procedures to address those matters in order that the shareholders as a body may better understand the process

by which we arrived at our audit opinion.

Our procedures were undertaken in the context of and solely for the purpose of our audit opinion on the

consolidated financial statements as a whole and we do not express discrete opinions on separate elements of

the consolidated financial statements.

The key audit matter How the matter was addressed in our audit

Carrying value of goodwill

As disclosed in note 16, the carrying value of the

Group’s goodwill as at 31 March 2025 was $4.7

billion. Key goodwill balances relate to One NZ,

$2.9 billion, RHCNZ Group, $1.1 billion, and

Qscan Group, $0.7 billion.

The goodwill is tested for impairment using

discounted cash flow models, which include a

range of judgemental assumptions about the

Our audit procedures over the goodwill included:

­ Assessing the appropriateness of the CGUs

determined;

­ Comparing the methodology adopted in the valuation

models to accepted valuation approaches;

Carrying value of goodwill

As disclosed in note 17, the carrying value of the Group’s goodwill as at 31 March 2026 was

$4.7 billion. Key goodwill balances relate to One NZ, $2.9 billion, RHCNZ Group, $1.0 billion,

and Qscan Group, $0.7 billion.

The goodwill is tested for impairment using discounted cash flow models, which include a range

of judgemental assumptions about the future performance of the relevant cash generating unit

(CGU).

The impairment testing focuses on those assumptions which have the most impact on value

and therefore are associated with a higher risk of impairment.

Given the significance of the goodwill to the Group, we consider this to be a key audit matter.

Our audit procedures over the goodwill included:

– Assessing the appropriateness of the CGUs determined;

– Comparing the methodology adopted in the valuation models to accepted valuation

approaches;

– Comparing the cash flow forecasts to Board approved budgets;

– Challenging future cash flow forecasts by comparing to historic growth rates achieved

and other relevant support, including independent market research;

– Using our valuation specialists to assess the reasonableness of the discount and terminal

growth rates used for each CGU; and

– Performing sensitivity analysis, considering a range of likely outcomes for various scenarios.

Carrying Value of investments in associates

As disclosed in Note 6, the carrying value of the Group’s investments in associates as at

31 March 2026 was $5.0 billion. Investments in associates contribute a significant portion

of the Group’s net surplus and total assets.

We consider this to be a key audit matter given the significance of these investments to the

Group, and due to the complexity of the restatement of the share of associate earnings, other

Comprehensive Income and the Investment in Associates balances during the year, as outlined

in Note 1.

Our procedures performed to assess the carrying value of associates included, amongst

others:

– Recalculating the share of profit from equity accounted investments using investee

financial information;

– Agreeing material investment additions, capital calls and distributions during the year

to bank statements and relevant shareholder agreements;

– Assessing the appropriateness of the prior period restatement relating to Longroad

Energy; and

– Considering the associate’s performance to date with reference to the most recent

audited financial statements and assessing relevant indicators of impairment.

95
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report

Contents

Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory




© 2025 KPMG, a New Zealand Partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organization of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited,

a private English company limited by guarantee. All rights reserved.


Document classification: KPMG Confidential


Independent Auditor’s Report

To the shareholders of Infratil Limited (G roup)

Report on the audit of the consolidated financial statements

Opinion

We have audited the accompanying consolidated

financial statements which comprise:

­ the consolidated statement of financial position as

at 31 March 2025;

­ the consolidated statements of comprehensive

income, changes in equity and cash flows for the

year then ended; and

­ notes, including material accounting policy

information and other explanatory information.


In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated

financial statements of Infratil Limited (the Company)

and its subsidiaries (the Group) on pages 54 to 118

present fairly in all material respects:

­ the Group’s financial position as at 31 March

2025 and its financial performance and cash

flows for the year ended on that date;

­ In accordance with New Zealand Equivalents to

International Financial Reporting Standards (NZ

IFRS) issued by the New Zealand Accounting

Standards Board and the International Financial

Reporting Standards issued by the International

Accounting Standards Board.



Basis for opinion

We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (New Zealand) (ISAs (NZ)). We

believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.

We are independent of Infratil Limited in accordance with Professional and Ethical Standard 1 International Code

of Ethics for Assurance Practitioners (Including International Independence Standards) (New Zealand) issued by

the New Zealand Auditing and Assurance Standards Board and the International Ethics Standards Board for

Accountants’ International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (including International Independence

Standards) (IESBA Code), as applicable to audits of financial statements of public interest entities. We have also

fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with Professional and Ethical Standards 1 and the IESBA

Code.

Our responsibilities under ISAs (NZ)(Revised) are further described in the Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit

of the consolidated financial statements section of our report.

Our firm has also provided other services to the Group in relation to climate related assurance, taxation services,

audit of regulatory disclosures and other assurance and advisory engagements. Subject to certain restrictions,

partners and employees of our firm may also deal with the Group on normal terms within the ordinary course of

trading activities of the business of the Group. These matters have not impaired our independence as auditor of

the Group. The firm has no other relationship with, or interest in, the Group.


Scoping






2


The scope of our audit is designed to ensure that we perform adequate work to be able to give an opinion on the

consolidated financial statements as a whole, taking into account the structure of the Group, the financial

reporting systems, processes and controls, and the industry in which it operates.

The context of our audit is set by the Group’s major activities in the financial year ended 31 March 2025. In

establishing the overall approach to the Group audit, we determined the type of work that needed to be

performed at the component level by us, as the Group engagement team, or component auditors operating under

our instruction.

A full scope audit was performed on the most significant investments for the Group using component materialities

which were lower than Group materiality. The component materiality considered the size and the risk profile of

each component.

Where the work was performed by component auditors, we determined the level of involvement we needed to

have in the audit work at those investments to be able to conclude whether sufficient appropriate audit evidence

had been obtained as a basis for our opinion on the Group financial statements as a whole. We kept in regular

communication with component audit teams throughout the year with phone calls, discussions and written

instructions and ensured that the component audit teams had the appropriate skills and competencies which are

needed for the audit. We reviewed the work undertaken by component auditors in order to ensure the quality and

adequacy of their work.



Materiality

The scope of our audit was influenced by our application of materiality. Materiality helped us to determine the

nature, timing and extent of our audit procedures and to evaluate the effect of misstatements, both individually

and on the consolidated financial statements as a whole. The materiality for the consolidated financial statements

as a whole was set at $120 million, determined with reference to a benchmark of the Group’s total assets. We

chose the benchmark because, in our view, this is a key measure of the Group’s performance.



Key audit matters

Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgement, were of most significance in our audit of

the consolidated financial statements in the current period. We summarise below those matters and our key audit

procedures to address those matters in order that the shareholders as a body may better understand the process

by which we arrived at our audit opinion.

Our procedures were undertaken in the context of and solely for the purpose of our audit opinion on the

consolidated financial statements as a whole and we do not express discrete opinions on separate elements of

the consolidated financial statements.

The key audit matter How the matter was addressed in our audit

Carrying value of goodwill

As disclosed in note 16, the carrying value of the

Group’s goodwill as at 31 March 2025 was $4.7

billion. Key goodwill balances relate to One NZ,

$2.9 billion, RHCNZ Group, $1.1 billion, and

Qscan Group, $0.7 billion.

The goodwill is tested for impairment using

discounted cash flow models, which include a

range of judgemental assumptions about the

Our audit procedures over the goodwill included:

­ Assessing the appropriateness of the CGUs

determined;

­ Comparing the methodology adopted in the valuation

models to accepted valuation approaches;






2


The scope of our audit is designed to ensure that we perform adequate work to be able to give an opinion on the

consolidated financial statements as a whole, taking into account the structure of the Group, the financial

reporting systems, processes and controls, and the industry in which it operates.

The context of our audit is set by the Group’s major activities in the financial year ended 31 March 2025. In

establishing the overall approach to the Group audit, we determined the type of work that needed to be

performed at the component level by us, as the Group engagement team, or component auditors operating under

our instruction.

A full scope audit was performed on the most significant investments for the Group using component materialities

which were lower than Group materiality. The component materiality considered the size and the risk profile of

each component.

Where the work was performed by component auditors, we determined the level of involvement we needed to

have in the audit work at those investments to be able to conclude whether sufficient appropriate audit evidence

had been obtained as a basis for our opinion on the Group financial statements as a whole. We kept in regular

communication with component audit teams throughout the year with phone calls, discussions and written

instructions and ensured that the component audit teams had the appropriate skills and competencies which are

needed for the audit. We reviewed the work undertaken by component auditors in order to ensure the quality and

adequacy of their work.



Materiality

The scope of our audit was influenced by our application of materiality. Materiality helped us to determine the

nature, timing and extent of our audit procedures and to evaluate the effect of misstatements, both individually

and on the consolidated financial statements as a whole. The materiality for the consolidated financial statements

as a whole was set at $120 million, determined with reference to a benchmark of the Group’s total assets. We

chose the benchmark because, in our view, this is a key measure of the Group’s performance.



Key audit matters

Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgement, were of most significance in our audit of

the consolidated financial statements in the current period. We summarise below those matters and our key audit

procedures to address those matters in order that the shareholders as a body may better understand the process

by which we arrived at our audit opinion.

Our procedures were undertaken in the context of and solely for the purpose of our audit opinion on the

consolidated financial statements as a whole and we do not express discrete opinions on separate elements of

the consolidated financial statements.

The key audit matter How the matter was addressed in our audit

Carrying value of goodwill

As disclosed in note 16, the carrying value of the

Group’s goodwill as at 31 March 2025 was $4.7

billion. Key goodwill balances relate to One NZ,

$2.9 billion, RHCNZ Group, $1.1 billion, and

Qscan Group, $0.7 billion.

The goodwill is tested for impairment using

discounted cash flow models, which include a

range of judgemental assumptions about the

Our audit procedures over the goodwill included:

­ Assessing the appropriateness of the CGUs

determined;

­ Comparing the methodology adopted in the valuation

models to accepted valuation approaches;

Revenue Recognition

As disclosed in Note 10, the Group reported revenue of $3.0 billion for the year ended

31 March 2026. Management recognises revenue according to the principles of IFRS 15

Revenue from Contracts with Customers, including following the 5-step model therein.

Revenue recognition is a key audit matter for Mobile and fixed services, and device revenue

earned by One NZ, as there is an inherent risk around the accuracy and timing of revenue

recognition given the complexity of systems, the large volume of data processed and manual

adjustments made. Moreover, significant management judgements and estimates are required

for multiple element arrangements. This risk is most pronounced for new bundled product

offerings or changing product plans and prices.

Our procedures over revenue recognition included, amongst others:

– Obtaining an understanding of billing systems and arrangements (including IT systems,

applications and control points).

– On a sample basis, testing underlying revenue transactions to invoice and receipt of cash

and evaluating the appropriateness of the allocation of the transaction price, including

variable consideration, to performance obligations.

– Reviewing the reconciliation between the underlying billing stacks to revenue reported in

the general ledger. Reconciling items and related journals were evaluated for accuracy and

appropriateness based on the nature of the manual entries posted.

– Deploying AI-enabled transaction scoring to identity higher-risk billed items for testing.

– Deploying KPMG AI Data and Analytics tools to identify unexpected ‘account pairings’ for

journal entries and inspected the underlying records to evaluate the appropriateness of

these journal entries.

– Evaluating revenue transactions either side of the reporting date to assess if these are

recognised in the correct period.






6


The key audit matter How the matter was addressed in our audit

­ Evaluating revenue transactions either side of the

reporting date to assess if these are recognised in the

correct period.



Other information

The Directors, on behalf of the Group, are responsible for the other information. The other information comprises

information included in the Annual Report, but does not include the financial statements and our auditor’s report

thereon. Other information includes discussion and analysis of the business on pages 1 to 51 and corporate

governance disclosures on pages 126 to 140.

Our opinion on the consolidated financial statements does not cover any other information and we do not

express any form of assurance conclusion thereon.

In connection with our audit of the consolidated financial statements our responsibility is to read the other

information and in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the

consolidated financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit or otherwise appears materially

misstated.

If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude there is a material misstatement of this other information,

we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report in this regard.



Use of this independent auditor’s report

This independent auditor’s report is made solely to the shareholders. Our audit work has been undertaken so

that we might state to the shareholders those matters we are required to state to them in the independent

auditor’s report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, none of KPMG, any entities

directly or indirectly controlled by KPMG, or any of their respective members or employees, accept or assume

any responsibility and deny all liability to anyone other than the shareholders for our audit work, this independent

auditor’s report, or any of the opinions we have formed.



Responsibilities of Directors for the consolidated financial

statements

The Directors, on behalf of the Group, are responsible for:

— the preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with NZ

IFRS issued by the New Zealand Accounting Standards Board and the International Financial Reporting

Standards issued by the International Accounting Standards Board;

— implementing the necessary internal control to enable the preparation of a consolidated set of financial

statements that is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; and

— assessing the ability of the Group to continue as a going concern. This includes disclosing, as

applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless

they either intend to liquidate or to cease operations or have no realistic alternative but to do so.


The Directors, on behalf of the Group, are responsible for the other information. The other

information comprises information included in the Annual Report, but does not include the

financial statements and our auditor’s report thereon. Other information includes discussion

and analysis of the business on pages 1 to 32 and corporate governance disclosures on

pages 98 to 114.

Our opinion on the consolidated financial statements does not cover any other information

and we do not express any form of assurance conclusion thereon.

In connection with our audit of the consolidated financial statements our responsibility is to

read the other information and in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially

inconsistent with the consolidated financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit

or otherwise appears materially misstated.

If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude there is a material misstatement of this

other information, we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report in this regard.

96
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report

Contents

Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory




© 2025 KPMG, a New Zealand Partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organization of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited,

a private English company limited by guarantee. All rights reserved.


Document classification: KPMG Confidential


Independent Auditor’s Report

To the shareholders of Infratil Limited (G roup)

Report on the audit of the consolidated financial statements

Opinion

We have audited the accompanying consolidated

financial statements which comprise:

­ the consolidated statement of financial position as

at 31 March 2025;

­ the consolidated statements of comprehensive

income, changes in equity and cash flows for the

year then ended; and

­ notes, including material accounting policy

information and other explanatory information.


In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated

financial statements of Infratil Limited (the Company)

and its subsidiaries (the Group) on pages 54 to 118

present fairly in all material respects:

­ the Group’s financial position as at 31 March

2025 and its financial performance and cash

flows for the year ended on that date;

­ In accordance with New Zealand Equivalents to

International Financial Reporting Standards (NZ

IFRS) issued by the New Zealand Accounting

Standards Board and the International Financial

Reporting Standards issued by the International

Accounting Standards Board.



Basis for opinion

We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (New Zealand) (ISAs (NZ)). We

believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.

We are independent of Infratil Limited in accordance with Professional and Ethical Standard 1 International Code

of Ethics for Assurance Practitioners (Including International Independence Standards) (New Zealand) issued by

the New Zealand Auditing and Assurance Standards Board and the International Ethics Standards Board for

Accountants’ International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (including International Independence

Standards) (IESBA Code), as applicable to audits of financial statements of public interest entities. We have also

fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with Professional and Ethical Standards 1 and the IESBA

Code.

Our responsibilities under ISAs (NZ)(Revised) are further described in the Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit

of the consolidated financial statements section of our report.

Our firm has also provided other services to the Group in relation to climate related assurance, taxation services,

audit of regulatory disclosures and other assurance and advisory engagements. Subject to certain restrictions,

partners and employees of our firm may also deal with the Group on normal terms within the ordinary course of

trading activities of the business of the Group. These matters have not impaired our independence as auditor of

the Group. The firm has no other relationship with, or interest in, the Group.


Scoping

The Directors, on behalf of the Group, are responsible for:

– the preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance

with NZ IFRS issued by the New Zealand Accounting Standards Board and the International

Financial Reporting Standards issued by the International Accounting Standards Board;

– implementing the necessary internal control to enable the preparation of a consolidated set

of financial statements that is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or

error; and

– assessing the ability of the Group to continue as a going concern. This includes disclosing,

as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of

accounting unless they either intend to liquidate or to cease operations or have no realistic

alternative but to do so.

Our objective is:

– to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are

free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; and

– to issue an independent auditor’s report that includes our opinion.

Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but it is not a guarantee that an audit

conducted in accordance with ISAs NZ will always detect a material misstatement when

it exists.

Misstatements can arise from fraud or error. They are considered material if, individually or in

the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of

users taken on the basis of the consolidated financial statements.

A further description of our responsibilities for the audit of the consolidated financial statements

is located at the External Reporting Board (XRB) website at:

https://www.xrb.govt.nz/standards/assurance-standards/auditors-responsibilities/audit-

report-1-1/

This description forms part of our independent auditor’s report.

The engagement partner on the audit resulting in this independent auditor’s report is Ed Louden.

For and on behalf of:

KPMG

Wellington

25 May 2026






6


The key audit matter How the matter was addressed in our audit

­ Evaluating revenue transactions either side of the

reporting date to assess if these are recognised in the

correct period.



Other information

The Directors, on behalf of the Group, are responsible for the other information. The other information comprises

information included in the Annual Report, but does not include the financial statements and our auditor’s report

thereon. Other information includes discussion and analysis of the business on pages 1 to 51 and corporate

governance disclosures on pages 126 to 140.

Our opinion on the consolidated financial statements does not cover any other information and we do not

express any form of assurance conclusion thereon.

In connection with our audit of the consolidated financial statements our responsibility is to read the other

information and in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the

consolidated financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit or otherwise appears materially

misstated.

If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude there is a material misstatement of this other information,

we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report in this regard.



Use of this independent auditor’s report

This independent auditor’s report is made solely to the shareholders. Our audit work has been undertaken so

that we might state to the shareholders those matters we are required to state to them in the independent

auditor’s report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, none of KPMG, any entities

directly or indirectly controlled by KPMG, or any of their respective members or employees, accept or assume

any responsibility and deny all liability to anyone other than the shareholders for our audit work, this independent

auditor’s report, or any of the opinions we have formed.


Responsibilities of Directors for the consolidated financial

statements

The Directors, on behalf of the Group, are responsible for:

— the preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with NZ

IFRS issued by the New Zealand Accounting Standards Board and the International Financial Reporting

Standards issued by the International Accounting Standards Board;

— implementing the necessary internal control to enable the preparation of a consolidated set of financial

statements that is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; and

— assessing the ability of the Group to continue as a going concern. This includes disclosing, as

applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless

they either intend to liquidate or to cease operations or have no realistic alternative but to do so.







6


The key audit matter How the matter was addressed in our audit

­ Evaluating revenue transactions either side of the

reporting date to assess if these are recognised in the

correct period.


Other information

The Directors, on behalf of the Group, are responsible for the other information. The other information comprises

information included in the Annual Report, but does not include the financial statements and our auditor’s report

thereon. Other information includes discussion and analysis of the business on pages 1 to 51 and corporate

governance disclosures on pages 126 to 140.

Our opinion on the consolidated financial statements does not cover any other information and we do not

express any form of assurance conclusion thereon.

In connection with our audit of the consolidated financial statements our responsibility is to read the other

information and in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the

consolidated financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit or otherwise appears materially

misstated.

If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude there is a material misstatement of this other information,

we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report in this regard.



Use of this independent auditor’s report

This independent auditor’s report is made solely to the shareholders. Our audit work has been undertaken so

that we might state to the shareholders those matters we are required to state to them in the independent

auditor’s report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, none of KPMG, any entities

directly or indirectly controlled by KPMG, or any of their respective members or employees, accept or assume

any responsibility and deny all liability to anyone other than the shareholders for our audit work, this independent

auditor’s report, or any of the opinions we have formed.



Responsibilities of Directors for the consolidated financial

statements

The Directors, on behalf of the Group, are responsible for:

— the preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with NZ

IFRS issued by the New Zealand Accounting Standards Board and the International Financial Reporting

Standards issued by the International Accounting Standards Board;

— implementing the necessary internal control to enable the preparation of a consolidated set of financial

statements that is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; and

— assessing the ability of the Group to continue as a going concern. This includes disclosing, as

applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless

they either intend to liquidate or to cease operations or have no realistic alternative but to do so.







6


The key audit matter How the matter was addressed in our audit

­ Evaluating revenue transactions either side of the

reporting date to assess if these are recognised in the

correct period.


Other information

The Directors, on behalf of the Group, are responsible for the other information. The other information comprises

information included in the Annual Report, but does not include the financial statements and our auditor’s report

thereon. Other information includes discussion and analysis of the business on pages 1 to 51 and corporate

governance disclosures on pages 126 to 140.

Our opinion on the consolidated financial statements does not cover any other information and we do not

express any form of assurance conclusion thereon.

In connection with our audit of the consolidated financial statements our responsibility is to read the other

information and in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the

consolidated financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit or otherwise appears materially

misstated.

If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude there is a material misstatement of this other information,

we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report in this regard.



Use of this independent auditor’s report

This independent auditor’s report is made solely to the shareholders. Our audit work has been undertaken so

that we might state to the shareholders those matters we are required to state to them in the independent

auditor’s report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, none of KPMG, any entities

directly or indirectly controlled by KPMG, or any of their respective members or employees, accept or assume

any responsibility and deny all liability to anyone other than the shareholders for our audit work, this independent

auditor’s report, or any of the opinions we have formed.



Responsibilities of Directors for the consolidated financial

statements

The Directors, on behalf of the Group, are responsible for:

— the preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with NZ

IFRS issued by the New Zealand Accounting Standards Board and the International Financial Reporting

Standards issued by the International Accounting Standards Board;

— implementing the necessary internal control to enable the preparation of a consolidated set of financial

statements that is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; and

— assessing the ability of the Group to continue as a going concern. This includes disclosing, as

applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless

they either intend to liquidate or to cease operations or have no realistic alternative but to do so.







6


The key audit matter How the matter was addressed in our audit

­ Evaluating revenue transactions either side of the

reporting date to assess if these are recognised in the

correct period.



Other information

The Directors, on behalf of the Group, are responsible for the other information. The other information comprises

information included in the Annual Report, but does not include the financial statements and our auditor’s report

thereon. Other information includes discussion and analysis of the business on pages 1 to 51 and corporate

governance disclosures on pages 126 to 140.

Our opinion on the consolidated financial statements does not cover any other information and we do not

express any form of assurance conclusion thereon.

In connection with our audit of the consolidated financial statements our responsibility is to read the other

information and in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the

consolidated financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit or otherwise appears materially

misstated.

If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude there is a material misstatement of this other information,

we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report in this regard.



Use of this independent auditor’s report

This independent auditor’s report is made solely to the shareholders. Our audit work has been undertaken so

that we might state to the shareholders those matters we are required to state to them in the independent

auditor’s report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, none of KPMG, any entities

directly or indirectly controlled by KPMG, or any of their respective members or employees, accept or assume

any responsibility and deny all liability to anyone other than the shareholders for our audit work, this independent

auditor’s report, or any of the opinions we have formed.



Responsibilities of Directors for the consolidated financial

statements

The Directors, on behalf of the Group, are responsible for:

— the preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with NZ

IFRS issued by the New Zealand Accounting Standards Board and the International Financial Reporting

Standards issued by the International Accounting Standards Board;

— implementing the necessary internal control to enable the preparation of a consolidated set of financial

statements that is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; and

— assessing the ability of the Group to continue as a going concern. This includes disclosing, as

applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless

they either intend to liquidate or to cease operations or have no realistic alternative but to do so.







6


The key audit matter How the matter was addressed in our audit

­ Evaluating revenue transactions either side of the

reporting date to assess if these are recognised in the

correct period.



Other information

The Directors, on behalf of the Group, are responsible for the other information. The other information comprises

information included in the Annual Report, but does not include the financial statements and our auditor’s report

thereon. Other information includes discussion and analysis of the business on pages 1 to 51 and corporate

governance disclosures on pages 126 to 140.

Our opinion on the consolidated financial statements does not cover any other information and we do not

express any form of assurance conclusion thereon.

In connection with our audit of the consolidated financial statements our responsibility is to read the other

information and in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the

consolidated financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit or otherwise appears materially

misstated.

If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude there is a material misstatement of this other information,

we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report in this regard.



Use of this independent auditor’s report

This independent auditor’s report is made solely to the shareholders. Our audit work has been undertaken so

that we might state to the shareholders those matters we are required to state to them in the independent

auditor’s report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, none of KPMG, any entities

directly or indirectly controlled by KPMG, or any of their respective members or employees, accept or assume

any responsibility and deny all liability to anyone other than the shareholders for our audit work, this independent

auditor’s report, or any of the opinions we have formed.



Responsibilities of Directors for the consolidated financial

statements

The Directors, on behalf of the Group, are responsible for:

— the preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with NZ

IFRS issued by the New Zealand Accounting Standards Board and the International Financial Reporting

Standards issued by the International Accounting Standards Board;

— implementing the necessary internal control to enable the preparation of a consolidated set of financial

statements that is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; and

— assessing the ability of the Group to continue as a going concern. This includes disclosing, as

applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless

they either intend to liquidate or to cease operations or have no realistic alternative but to do so.







7


Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the consolidated

financial statements

Our objective is:

— to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from

material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; and

— to issue an independent auditor’s report that includes our opinion.

Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but it is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in

accordance with ISAs NZ will always detect a material misstatement when it exists.

Misstatements can arise from fraud or error. They are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they

could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of the

consolidated financial statements.

A further description of our responsibilities for the audit of the consolidated financial statements is located at the

External Reporting Board (XRB) website at:

https://www.xrb.govt.nz/standards/assurance-standards/auditors-responsibilities/audit-report-1 -1/


This description forms part of our independent auditor’s report.

The engagement partner on the audit resulting in this independent auditor’s report is Ed Louden.


For and on behalf of:



KPMG

Wellington

27 May 2025






6


The key audit matter How the matter was addressed in our audit

­ Evaluating revenue transactions either side of the

reporting date to assess if these are recognised in the

correct period.


Other information

The Directors, on behalf of the Group, are responsible for the other information. The other information comprises

information included in the Annual Report, but does not include the financial statements and our auditor’s report

thereon. Other information includes discussion and analysis of the business on pages 1 to 51 and corporate

governance disclosures on pages 126 to 140.

Our opinion on the consolidated financial statements does not cover any other information and we do not

express any form of assurance conclusion thereon.

In connection with our audit of the consolidated financial statements our responsibility is to read the other

information and in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the

consolidated financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit or otherwise appears materially

misstated.

If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude there is a material misstatement of this other information,

we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report in this regard.


Use of this independent auditor’s report

This independent auditor’s report is made solely to the shareholders. Our audit work has been undertaken so

that we might state to the shareholders those matters we are required to state to them in the independent

auditor’s report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, none of KPMG, any entities

directly or indirectly controlled by KPMG, or any of their respective members or employees, accept or assume

any responsibility and deny all liability to anyone other than the shareholders for our audit work, this independent

auditor’s report, or any of the opinions we have formed.



Responsibilities of Directors for the consolidated financial

statements

The Directors, on behalf of the Group, are responsible for:

— the preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with NZ

IFRS issued by the New Zealand Accounting Standards Board and the International Financial Reporting

Standards issued by the International Accounting Standards Board;

— implementing the necessary internal control to enable the preparation of a consolidated set of financial

statements that is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; and

— assessing the ability of the Group to continue as a going concern. This includes disclosing, as

applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless

they either intend to liquidate or to cease operations or have no realistic alternative but to do so.


This independent auditor’s report is made solely to the shareholders. Our audit work has been

undertaken so that we might state to the shareholders those matters we are required to state

to them in the independent auditor’s report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent

permitted by law, none of KPMG, any entities directly or indirectly controlled by KPMG, or any

of their respective members or employees, accept or assume any responsibility and deny all

liability to anyone other than the shareholders for our audit work, this independent auditor’s

report, or any of the opinions we have formed.









Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the consolidated

financial statements

Our objective is:

— to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from

material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; and

— to issue an independent auditor’s report that includes our opinion.

Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but it is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in

accordance with ISAs NZ will always detect a material misstatement when it exists.

Misstatements can arise from fraud or error. They are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they

could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of the

consolidated financial statements.

A further description of our responsibilities for the audit of the consolidated financial statements is located at the

External Reporting Board (XRB) website at:

https://www.xrb.govt.nz/standards/assurance-standards/auditors-responsibilities/audit-report-1-1/

This description forms part of our independent auditor’s report.

The engagement partner on the audit resulting in this independent auditor’s report is Ed Louden.


For and on behalf of:


KPMG

Wellington

25 May 2026






© 2025 KPMG, a New Zealand Partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organization of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited,

a private English company limited by guarantee. All rights reserved.


Document classification: KPMG Confidential


Independent Auditor’s Report

To the shareholders of Infratil Limited (G roup)

Report on the audit of the consolidated financial statements

Opinion

We have audited the accompanying consolidated

financial statements which comprise:

­ the consolidated statement of financial position as

at 31 March 2025;

­ the consolidated statements of comprehensive

income, changes in equity and cash flows for the

year then ended; and

­ notes, including material accounting policy

information and other explanatory information.


In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated

financial statements of Infratil Limited (the Company)

and its subsidiaries (the Group) on pages 54 to 118

present fairly in all material respects:

­ the Group’s financial position as at 31 March

2025 and its financial performance and cash

flows for the year ended on that date;

­ In accordance with New Zealand Equivalents to

International Financial Reporting Standards (NZ

IFRS) issued by the New Zealand Accounting

Standards Board and the International Financial

Reporting Standards issued by the International

Accounting Standards Board.



Basis for opinion

We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (New Zealand) (ISAs (NZ)). We

believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.

We are independent of Infratil Limited in accordance with Professional and Ethical Standard 1 International Code

of Ethics for Assurance Practitioners (Including International Independence Standards) (New Zealand) issued by

the New Zealand Auditing and Assurance Standards Board and the International Ethics Standards Board for

Accountants’ International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (including International Independence

Standards) (IESBA Code), as applicable to audits of financial statements of public interest entities. We have also

fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with Professional and Ethical Standards 1 and the IESBA

Code.

Our responsibilities under ISAs (NZ)(Revised) are further described in the Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit

of the consolidated financial statements section of our report.

Our firm has also provided other services to the Group in relation to climate related assurance, taxation services,

audit of regulatory disclosures and other assurance and advisory engagements. Subject to certain restrictions,

partners and employees of our firm may also deal with the Group on normal terms within the ordinary course of

trading activities of the business of the Group. These matters have not impaired our independence as auditor of

the Group. The firm has no other relationship with, or interest in, the Group.


Scoping

The Directors, on behalf of the Group, are responsible for:

– the preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance

with NZ IFRS issued by the New Zealand Accounting Standards Board and the International

Financial Reporting Standards issued by the International Accounting Standards Board;

– implementing the necessary internal control to enable the preparation of a consolidated set

of financial statements that is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or

error; and

– assessing the ability of the Group to continue as a going concern. This includes disclosing,

as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of

accounting unless they either intend to liquidate or to cease operations or have no realistic

alternative but to do so.

Our objective is:

– to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are

free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; and

– to issue an independent auditor’s report that includes our opinion.

Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but it is not a guarantee that an audit

conducted in accordance with ISAs NZ will always detect a material misstatement when

it exists.

Misstatements can arise from fraud or error. They are considered material if, individually or in

the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of

users taken on the basis of the consolidated financial statements.

A further description of our responsibilities for the audit of the consolidated financial statements

is located at the External Reporting Board (XRB) website at:

https://www.xrb.govt.nz/standards/assurance-standards/auditors-responsibilities/audit-

report-1-1/

This description forms part of our independent auditor’s report.

The engagement partner on the audit resulting in this independent auditor’s report is Ed Louden.

For and on behalf of:

KPMG

Wellington

25 May 2026






6


The key audit matter How the matter was addressed in our audit

­ Evaluating revenue transactions either side of the

reporting date to assess if these are recognised in the

correct period.


Other information

The Directors, on behalf of the Group, are responsible for the other information. The other information comprises

information included in the Annual Report, but does not include the financial statements and our auditor’s report

thereon. Other information includes discussion and analysis of the business on pages 1 to 51 and corporate

governance disclosures on pages 126 to 140.

Our opinion on the consolidated financial statements does not cover any other information and we do not

express any form of assurance conclusion thereon.

In connection with our audit of the consolidated financial statements our responsibility is to read the other

information and in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the

consolidated financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit or otherwise appears materially

misstated.

If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude there is a material misstatement of this other information,

we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report in this regard.



Use of this independent auditor’s report

This independent auditor’s report is made solely to the shareholders. Our audit work has been undertaken so

that we might state to the shareholders those matters we are required to state to them in the independent

auditor’s report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, none of KPMG, any entities

directly or indirectly controlled by KPMG, or any of their respective members or employees, accept or assume

any responsibility and deny all liability to anyone other than the shareholders for our audit work, this independent

auditor’s report, or any of the opinions we have formed.


Responsibilities of Directors for the consolidated financial

statements

The Directors, on behalf of the Group, are responsible for:

— the preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with NZ

IFRS issued by the New Zealand Accounting Standards Board and the International Financial Reporting

Standards issued by the International Accounting Standards Board;

— implementing the necessary internal control to enable the preparation of a consolidated set of financial

statements that is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; and

— assessing the ability of the Group to continue as a going concern. This includes disclosing, as

applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless

they either intend to liquidate or to cease operations or have no realistic alternative but to do so.







6


The key audit matter How the matter was addressed in our audit

­ Evaluating revenue transactions either side of the

reporting date to assess if these are recognised in the

correct period.


Other information

The Directors, on behalf of the Group, are responsible for the other information. The other information comprises

information included in the Annual Report, but does not include the financial statements and our auditor’s report

thereon. Other information includes discussion and analysis of the business on pages 1 to 51 and corporate

governance disclosures on pages 126 to 140.

Our opinion on the consolidated financial statements does not cover any other information and we do not

express any form of assurance conclusion thereon.

In connection with our audit of the consolidated financial statements our responsibility is to read the other

information and in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the

consolidated financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit or otherwise appears materially

misstated.

If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude there is a material misstatement of this other information,

we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report in this regard.



Use of this independent auditor’s report

This independent auditor’s report is made solely to the shareholders. Our audit work has been undertaken so

that we might state to the shareholders those matters we are required to state to them in the independent

auditor’s report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, none of KPMG, any entities

directly or indirectly controlled by KPMG, or any of their respective members or employees, accept or assume

any responsibility and deny all liability to anyone other than the shareholders for our audit work, this independent

auditor’s report, or any of the opinions we have formed.



Responsibilities of Directors for the consolidated financial

statements

The Directors, on behalf of the Group, are responsible for:

— the preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with NZ

IFRS issued by the New Zealand Accounting Standards Board and the International Financial Reporting

Standards issued by the International Accounting Standards Board;

— implementing the necessary internal control to enable the preparation of a consolidated set of financial

statements that is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; and

— assessing the ability of the Group to continue as a going concern. This includes disclosing, as

applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless

they either intend to liquidate or to cease operations or have no realistic alternative but to do so.







6


The key audit matter How the matter was addressed in our audit

­ Evaluating revenue transactions either side of the

reporting date to assess if these are recognised in the

correct period.



Other information

The Directors, on behalf of the Group, are responsible for the other information. The other information comprises

information included in the Annual Report, but does not include the financial statements and our auditor’s report

thereon. Other information includes discussion and analysis of the business on pages 1 to 51 and corporate

governance disclosures on pages 126 to 140.

Our opinion on the consolidated financial statements does not cover any other information and we do not

express any form of assurance conclusion thereon.

In connection with our audit of the consolidated financial statements our responsibility is to read the other

information and in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the

consolidated financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit or otherwise appears materially

misstated.

If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude there is a material misstatement of this other information,

we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report in this regard.



Use of this independent auditor’s report

This independent auditor’s report is made solely to the shareholders. Our audit work has been undertaken so

that we might state to the shareholders those matters we are required to state to them in the independent

auditor’s report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, none of KPMG, any entities

directly or indirectly controlled by KPMG, or any of their respective members or employees, accept or assume

any responsibility and deny all liability to anyone other than the shareholders for our audit work, this independent

auditor’s report, or any of the opinions we have formed.



Responsibilities of Directors for the consolidated financial

statements

The Directors, on behalf of the Group, are responsible for:

— the preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with NZ

IFRS issued by the New Zealand Accounting Standards Board and the International Financial Reporting

Standards issued by the International Accounting Standards Board;

— implementing the necessary internal control to enable the preparation of a consolidated set of financial

statements that is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; and

— assessing the ability of the Group to continue as a going concern. This includes disclosing, as

applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless

they either intend to liquidate or to cease operations or have no realistic alternative but to do so.







6


The key audit matter How the matter was addressed in our audit

­ Evaluating revenue transactions either side of the

reporting date to assess if these are recognised in the

correct period.



Other information

The Directors, on behalf of the Group, are responsible for the other information. The other information comprises

information included in the Annual Report, but does not include the financial statements and our auditor’s report

thereon. Other information includes discussion and analysis of the business on pages 1 to 51 and corporate

governance disclosures on pages 126 to 140.

Our opinion on the consolidated financial statements does not cover any other information and we do not

express any form of assurance conclusion thereon.

In connection with our audit of the consolidated financial statements our responsibility is to read the other

information and in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the

consolidated financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit or otherwise appears materially

misstated.

If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude there is a material misstatement of this other information,

we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report in this regard.



Use of this independent auditor’s report

This independent auditor’s report is made solely to the shareholders. Our audit work has been undertaken so

that we might state to the shareholders those matters we are required to state to them in the independent

auditor’s report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, none of KPMG, any entities

directly or indirectly controlled by KPMG, or any of their respective members or employees, accept or assume

any responsibility and deny all liability to anyone other than the shareholders for our audit work, this independent

auditor’s report, or any of the opinions we have formed.



Responsibilities of Directors for the consolidated financial

statements

The Directors, on behalf of the Group, are responsible for:

— the preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with NZ

IFRS issued by the New Zealand Accounting Standards Board and the International Financial Reporting

Standards issued by the International Accounting Standards Board;

— implementing the necessary internal control to enable the preparation of a consolidated set of financial

statements that is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; and

— assessing the ability of the Group to continue as a going concern. This includes disclosing, as

applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless

they either intend to liquidate or to cease operations or have no realistic alternative but to do so.







6


The key audit matter How the matter was addressed in our audit

­ Evaluating revenue transactions either side of the

reporting date to assess if these are recognised in the

correct period.



Other information

The Directors, on behalf of the Group, are responsible for the other information. The other information comprises

information included in the Annual Report, but does not include the financial statements and our auditor’s report

thereon. Other information includes discussion and analysis of the business on pages 1 to 51 and corporate

governance disclosures on pages 126 to 140.

Our opinion on the consolidated financial statements does not cover any other information and we do not

express any form of assurance conclusion thereon.

In connection with our audit of the consolidated financial statements our responsibility is to read the other

information and in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the

consolidated financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit or otherwise appears materially

misstated.

If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude there is a material misstatement of this other information,

we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report in this regard.



Use of this independent auditor’s report

This independent auditor’s report is made solely to the shareholders. Our audit work has been undertaken so

that we might state to the shareholders those matters we are required to state to them in the independent

auditor’s report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, none of KPMG, any entities

directly or indirectly controlled by KPMG, or any of their respective members or employees, accept or assume

any responsibility and deny all liability to anyone other than the shareholders for our audit work, this independent

auditor’s report, or any of the opinions we have formed.



Responsibilities of Directors for the consolidated financial

statements

The Directors, on behalf of the Group, are responsible for:

— the preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with NZ

IFRS issued by the New Zealand Accounting Standards Board and the International Financial Reporting

Standards issued by the International Accounting Standards Board;

— implementing the necessary internal control to enable the preparation of a consolidated set of financial

statements that is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; and

— assessing the ability of the Group to continue as a going concern. This includes disclosing, as

applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless

they either intend to liquidate or to cease operations or have no realistic alternative but to do so.







7


Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the consolidated

financial statements

Our objective is:

— to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from

material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; and

— to issue an independent auditor’s report that includes our opinion.

Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but it is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in

accordance with ISAs NZ will always detect a material misstatement when it exists.

Misstatements can arise from fraud or error. They are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they

could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of the

consolidated financial statements.

A further description of our responsibilities for the audit of the consolidated financial statements is located at the

External Reporting Board (XRB) website at:

https://www.xrb.govt.nz/standards/assurance-standards/auditors-responsibilities/audit-report-1 -1/


This description forms part of our independent auditor’s report.

The engagement partner on the audit resulting in this independent auditor’s report is Ed Louden.


For and on behalf of:



KPMG

Wellington

27 May 2025






6


The key audit matter How the matter was addressed in our audit

­ Evaluating revenue transactions either side of the

reporting date to assess if these are recognised in the

correct period.


Other information

The Directors, on behalf of the Group, are responsible for the other information. The other information comprises

information included in the Annual Report, but does not include the financial statements and our auditor’s report

thereon. Other information includes discussion and analysis of the business on pages 1 to 51 and corporate

governance disclosures on pages 126 to 140.

Our opinion on the consolidated financial statements does not cover any other information and we do not

express any form of assurance conclusion thereon.

In connection with our audit of the consolidated financial statements our responsibility is to read the other

information and in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the

consolidated financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit or otherwise appears materially

misstated.

If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude there is a material misstatement of this other information,

we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report in this regard.


Use of this independent auditor’s report

This independent auditor’s report is made solely to the shareholders. Our audit work has been undertaken so

that we might state to the shareholders those matters we are required to state to them in the independent

auditor’s report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, none of KPMG, any entities

directly or indirectly controlled by KPMG, or any of their respective members or employees, accept or assume

any responsibility and deny all liability to anyone other than the shareholders for our audit work, this independent

auditor’s report, or any of the opinions we have formed.



Responsibilities of Directors for the consolidated financial

statements

The Directors, on behalf of the Group, are responsible for:

— the preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with NZ

IFRS issued by the New Zealand Accounting Standards Board and the International Financial Reporting

Standards issued by the International Accounting Standards Board;

— implementing the necessary internal control to enable the preparation of a consolidated set of financial

statements that is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; and

— assessing the ability of the Group to continue as a going concern. This includes disclosing, as

applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless

they either intend to liquidate or to cease operations or have no realistic alternative but to do so.


This independent auditor’s report is made solely to the shareholders. Our audit work has been

undertaken so that we might state to the shareholders those matters we are required to state

to them in the independent auditor’s report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent

permitted by law, none of KPMG, any entities directly or indirectly controlled by KPMG, or any

of their respective members or employees, accept or assume any responsibility and deny all

liability to anyone other than the shareholders for our audit work, this independent auditor’s

report, or any of the opinions we have formed.









Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the consolidated

financial statements

Our objective is:

— to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from

material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; and

— to issue an independent auditor’s report that includes our opinion.

Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but it is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in

accordance with ISAs NZ will always detect a material misstatement when it exists.

Misstatements can arise from fraud or error. They are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they

could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of the

consolidated financial statements.

A further description of our responsibilities for the audit of the consolidated financial statements is located at the

External Reporting Board (XRB) website at:

https://www.xrb.govt.nz/standards/assurance-standards/auditors-responsibilities/audit-report-1-1/

This description forms part of our independent auditor’s report.

The engagement partner on the audit resulting in this independent auditor’s report is Ed Louden.


For and on behalf of:


KPMG

Wellington

25 May 2026



96

Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report

Contents

Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory




© 2025 KPMG, a New Zealand Partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organization of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited,

a private English company limited by guarantee. All rights reserved.


Document classification: KPMG Confidential


Independent Auditor’s Report

To the shareholders of Infratil Limited (G roup)

Report on the audit of the consolidated financial statements

Opinion

We have audited the accompanying consolidated

financial statements which comprise:

­ the consolidated statement of financial position as

at 31 March 2025;

­ the consolidated statements of comprehensive

income, changes in equity and cash flows for the

year then ended; and

­ notes, including material accounting policy

information and other explanatory information.


In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated

financial statements of Infratil Limited (the Company)

and its subsidiaries (the Group) on pages 54 to 118

present fairly in all material respects:

­ the Group’s financial position as at 31 March

2025 and its financial performance and cash

flows for the year ended on that date;

­ In accordance with New Zealand Equivalents to

International Financial Reporting Standards (NZ

IFRS) issued by the New Zealand Accounting

Standards Board and the International Financial

Reporting Standards issued by the International

Accounting Standards Board.



Basis for opinion

We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (New Zealand) (ISAs (NZ)). We

believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.

We are independent of Infratil Limited in accordance with Professional and Ethical Standard 1 International Code

of Ethics for Assurance Practitioners (Including International Independence Standards) (New Zealand) issued by

the New Zealand Auditing and Assurance Standards Board and the International Ethics Standards Board for

Accountants’ International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (including International Independence

Standards) (IESBA Code), as applicable to audits of financial statements of public interest entities. We have also

fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with Professional and Ethical Standards 1 and the IESBA

Code.

Our responsibilities under ISAs (NZ)(Revised) are further described in the Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit

of the consolidated financial statements section of our report.

Our firm has also provided other services to the Group in relation to climate related assurance, taxation services,

audit of regulatory disclosures and other assurance and advisory engagements. Subject to certain restrictions,

partners and employees of our firm may also deal with the Group on normal terms within the ordinary course of

trading activities of the business of the Group. These matters have not impaired our independence as auditor of

the Group. The firm has no other relationship with, or interest in, the Group.


Scoping

The Directors, on behalf of the Group, are responsible for:

– the preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance

with NZ IFRS issued by the New Zealand Accounting Standards Board and the International

Financial Reporting Standards issued by the International Accounting Standards Board;

– implementing the necessary internal control to enable the preparation of a consolidated set

of financial statements that is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or

error; and

– assessing the ability of the Group to continue as a going concern. This includes disclosing,

as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of

accounting unless they either intend to liquidate or to cease operations or have no realistic

alternative but to do so.

Our objective is:

– to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are

free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; and

– to issue an independent auditor’s report that includes our opinion.

Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but it is not a guarantee that an audit

conducted in accordance with ISAs NZ will always detect a material misstatement when

it exists.

Misstatements can arise from fraud or error. They are considered material if, individually or in

the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of

users taken on the basis of the consolidated financial statements.

A further description of our responsibilities for the audit of the consolidated financial statements

is located at the External Reporting Board (XRB) website at:

https://www.xrb.govt.nz/standards/assurance-standards/auditors-responsibilities/audit-

report-1-1/

This description forms part of our independent auditor’s report.

The engagement partner on the audit resulting in this independent auditor’s report is Ed Louden.

For and on behalf of:

KPMG

Wellington

25 May 2026






6


The key audit matter How the matter was addressed in our audit

­ Evaluating revenue transactions either side of the

reporting date to assess if these are recognised in the

correct period.



Other information

The Directors, on behalf of the Group, are responsible for the other information. The other information comprises

information included in the Annual Report, but does not include the financial statements and our auditor’s report

thereon. Other information includes discussion and analysis of the business on pages 1 to 51 and corporate

governance disclosures on pages 126 to 140.

Our opinion on the consolidated financial statements does not cover any other information and we do not

express any form of assurance conclusion thereon.

In connection with our audit of the consolidated financial statements our responsibility is to read the other

information and in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the

consolidated financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit or otherwise appears materially

misstated.

If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude there is a material misstatement of this other information,

we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report in this regard.



Use of this independent auditor’s report

This independent auditor’s report is made solely to the shareholders. Our audit work has been undertaken so

that we might state to the shareholders those matters we are required to state to them in the independent

auditor’s report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, none of KPMG, any entities

directly or indirectly controlled by KPMG, or any of their respective members or employees, accept or assume

any responsibility and deny all liability to anyone other than the shareholders for our audit work, this independent

auditor’s report, or any of the opinions we have formed.


Responsibilities of Directors for the consolidated financial

statements

The Directors, on behalf of the Group, are responsible for:

— the preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with NZ

IFRS issued by the New Zealand Accounting Standards Board and the International Financial Reporting

Standards issued by the International Accounting Standards Board;

— implementing the necessary internal control to enable the preparation of a consolidated set of financial

statements that is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; and

— assessing the ability of the Group to continue as a going concern. This includes disclosing, as

applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless

they either intend to liquidate or to cease operations or have no realistic alternative but to do so.







6


The key audit matter How the matter was addressed in our audit

­ Evaluating revenue transactions either side of the

reporting date to assess if these are recognised in the

correct period.


Other information

The Directors, on behalf of the Group, are responsible for the other information. The other information comprises

information included in the Annual Report, but does not include the financial statements and our auditor’s report

thereon. Other information includes discussion and analysis of the business on pages 1 to 51 and corporate

governance disclosures on pages 126 to 140.

Our opinion on the consolidated financial statements does not cover any other information and we do not

express any form of assurance conclusion thereon.

In connection with our audit of the consolidated financial statements our responsibility is to read the other

information and in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the

consolidated financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit or otherwise appears materially

misstated.

If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude there is a material misstatement of this other information,

we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report in this regard.



Use of this independent auditor’s report

This independent auditor’s report is made solely to the shareholders. Our audit work has been undertaken so

that we might state to the shareholders those matters we are required to state to them in the independent

auditor’s report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, none of KPMG, any entities

directly or indirectly controlled by KPMG, or any of their respective members or employees, accept or assume

any responsibility and deny all liability to anyone other than the shareholders for our audit work, this independent

auditor’s report, or any of the opinions we have formed.



Responsibilities of Directors for the consolidated financial

statements

The Directors, on behalf of the Group, are responsible for:

— the preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with NZ

IFRS issued by the New Zealand Accounting Standards Board and the International Financial Reporting

Standards issued by the International Accounting Standards Board;

— implementing the necessary internal control to enable the preparation of a consolidated set of financial

statements that is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; and

— assessing the ability of the Group to continue as a going concern. This includes disclosing, as

applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless

they either intend to liquidate or to cease operations or have no realistic alternative but to do so.







6


The key audit matter How the matter was addressed in our audit

­ Evaluating revenue transactions either side of the

reporting date to assess if these are recognised in the

correct period.


Other information

The Directors, on behalf of the Group, are responsible for the other information. The other information comprises

information included in the Annual Report, but does not include the financial statements and our auditor’s report

thereon. Other information includes discussion and analysis of the business on pages 1 to 51 and corporate

governance disclosures on pages 126 to 140.

Our opinion on the consolidated financial statements does not cover any other information and we do not

express any form of assurance conclusion thereon.

In connection with our audit of the consolidated financial statements our responsibility is to read the other

information and in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the

consolidated financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit or otherwise appears materially

misstated.

If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude there is a material misstatement of this other information,

we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report in this regard.



Use of this independent auditor’s report

This independent auditor’s report is made solely to the shareholders. Our audit work has been undertaken so

that we might state to the shareholders those matters we are required to state to them in the independent

auditor’s report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, none of KPMG, any entities

directly or indirectly controlled by KPMG, or any of their respective members or employees, accept or assume

any responsibility and deny all liability to anyone other than the shareholders for our audit work, this independent

auditor’s report, or any of the opinions we have formed.



Responsibilities of Directors for the consolidated financial

statements

The Directors, on behalf of the Group, are responsible for:

— the preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with NZ

IFRS issued by the New Zealand Accounting Standards Board and the International Financial Reporting

Standards issued by the International Accounting Standards Board;

— implementing the necessary internal control to enable the preparation of a consolidated set of financial

statements that is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; and

— assessing the ability of the Group to continue as a going concern. This includes disclosing, as

applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless

they either intend to liquidate or to cease operations or have no realistic alternative but to do so.







6


The key audit matter How the matter was addressed in our audit

­ Evaluating revenue transactions either side of the

reporting date to assess if these are recognised in the

correct period.



Other information

The Directors, on behalf of the Group, are responsible for the other information. The other information comprises

information included in the Annual Report, but does not include the financial statements and our auditor’s report

thereon. Other information includes discussion and analysis of the business on pages 1 to 51 and corporate

governance disclosures on pages 126 to 140.

Our opinion on the consolidated financial statements does not cover any other information and we do not

express any form of assurance conclusion thereon.

In connection with our audit of the consolidated financial statements our responsibility is to read the other

information and in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the

consolidated financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit or otherwise appears materially

misstated.

If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude there is a material misstatement of this other information,

we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report in this regard.



Use of this independent auditor’s report

This independent auditor’s report is made solely to the shareholders. Our audit work has been undertaken so

that we might state to the shareholders those matters we are required to state to them in the independent

auditor’s report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, none of KPMG, any entities

directly or indirectly controlled by KPMG, or any of their respective members or employees, accept or assume

any responsibility and deny all liability to anyone other than the shareholders for our audit work, this independent

auditor’s report, or any of the opinions we have formed.



Responsibilities of Directors for the consolidated financial

statements

The Directors, on behalf of the Group, are responsible for:

— the preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with NZ

IFRS issued by the New Zealand Accounting Standards Board and the International Financial Reporting

Standards issued by the International Accounting Standards Board;

— implementing the necessary internal control to enable the preparation of a consolidated set of financial

statements that is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; and

— assessing the ability of the Group to continue as a going concern. This includes disclosing, as

applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless

they either intend to liquidate or to cease operations or have no realistic alternative but to do so.







6


The key audit matter How the matter was addressed in our audit

­ Evaluating revenue transactions either side of the

reporting date to assess if these are recognised in the

correct period.



Other information

The Directors, on behalf of the Group, are responsible for the other information. The other information comprises

information included in the Annual Report, but does not include the financial statements and our auditor’s report

thereon. Other information includes discussion and analysis of the business on pages 1 to 51 and corporate

governance disclosures on pages 126 to 140.

Our opinion on the consolidated financial statements does not cover any other information and we do not

express any form of assurance conclusion thereon.

In connection with our audit of the consolidated financial statements our responsibility is to read the other

information and in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the

consolidated financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit or otherwise appears materially

misstated.

If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude there is a material misstatement of this other information,

we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report in this regard.



Use of this independent auditor’s report

This independent auditor’s report is made solely to the shareholders. Our audit work has been undertaken so

that we might state to the shareholders those matters we are required to state to them in the independent

auditor’s report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, none of KPMG, any entities

directly or indirectly controlled by KPMG, or any of their respective members or employees, accept or assume

any responsibility and deny all liability to anyone other than the shareholders for our audit work, this independent

auditor’s report, or any of the opinions we have formed.



Responsibilities of Directors for the consolidated financial

statements

The Directors, on behalf of the Group, are responsible for:

— the preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with NZ

IFRS issued by the New Zealand Accounting Standards Board and the International Financial Reporting

Standards issued by the International Accounting Standards Board;

— implementing the necessary internal control to enable the preparation of a consolidated set of financial

statements that is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; and

— assessing the ability of the Group to continue as a going concern. This includes disclosing, as

applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless

they either intend to liquidate or to cease operations or have no realistic alternative but to do so.







7


Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the consolidated

financial statements

Our objective is:

— to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from

material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; and

— to issue an independent auditor’s report that includes our opinion.

Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but it is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in

accordance with ISAs NZ will always detect a material misstatement when it exists.

Misstatements can arise from fraud or error. They are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they

could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of the

consolidated financial statements.

A further description of our responsibilities for the audit of the consolidated financial statements is located at the

External Reporting Board (XRB) website at:

https://www.xrb.govt.nz/standards/assurance-standards/auditors-responsibilities/audit-report-1 -1/


This description forms part of our independent auditor’s report.

The engagement partner on the audit resulting in this independent auditor’s report is Ed Louden.


For and on behalf of:



KPMG

Wellington

27 May 2025






6


The key audit matter How the matter was addressed in our audit

­ Evaluating revenue transactions either side of the

reporting date to assess if these are recognised in the

correct period.


Other information

The Directors, on behalf of the Group, are responsible for the other information. The other information comprises

information included in the Annual Report, but does not include the financial statements and our auditor’s report

thereon. Other information includes discussion and analysis of the business on pages 1 to 51 and corporate

governance disclosures on pages 126 to 140.

Our opinion on the consolidated financial statements does not cover any other information and we do not

express any form of assurance conclusion thereon.

In connection with our audit of the consolidated financial statements our responsibility is to read the other

information and in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the

consolidated financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit or otherwise appears materially

misstated.

If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude there is a material misstatement of this other information,

we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report in this regard.


Use of this independent auditor’s report

This independent auditor’s report is made solely to the shareholders. Our audit work has been undertaken so

that we might state to the shareholders those matters we are required to state to them in the independent

auditor’s report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, none of KPMG, any entities

directly or indirectly controlled by KPMG, or any of their respective members or employees, accept or assume

any responsibility and deny all liability to anyone other than the shareholders for our audit work, this independent

auditor’s report, or any of the opinions we have formed.



Responsibilities of Directors for the consolidated financial

statements

The Directors, on behalf of the Group, are responsible for:

— the preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with NZ

IFRS issued by the New Zealand Accounting Standards Board and the International Financial Reporting

Standards issued by the International Accounting Standards Board;

— implementing the necessary internal control to enable the preparation of a consolidated set of financial

statements that is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; and

— assessing the ability of the Group to continue as a going concern. This includes disclosing, as

applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless

they either intend to liquidate or to cease operations or have no realistic alternative but to do so.


This independent auditor’s report is made solely to the shareholders. Our audit work has been

undertaken so that we might state to the shareholders those matters we are required to state

to them in the independent auditor’s report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent

permitted by law, none of KPMG, any entities directly or indirectly controlled by KPMG, or any

of their respective members or employees, accept or assume any responsibility and deny all

liability to anyone other than the shareholders for our audit work, this independent auditor’s

report, or any of the opinions we have formed.









Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the consolidated

financial statements

Our objective is:

— to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from

material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; and

— to issue an independent auditor’s report that includes our opinion.

Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but it is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in

accordance with ISAs NZ will always detect a material misstatement when it exists.

Misstatements can arise from fraud or error. They are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they

could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of the

consolidated financial statements.

A further description of our responsibilities for the audit of the consolidated financial statements is located at the

External Reporting Board (XRB) website at:

https://www.xrb.govt.nz/standards/assurance-standards/auditors-responsibilities/audit-report-1-1/

This description forms part of our independent auditor’s report.

The engagement partner on the audit resulting in this independent auditor’s report is Ed Louden.


For and on behalf of:


KPMG

Wellington

25 May 2026


97
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report

Contents

Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

DELIVERING

IDEAS THAT

MATTER

97

Infratil Annual ReportCorporate governance

Contents

Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

98
Corporate governanceInfratil Annual Report

Contents

Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

ALISON GERRY

Joined

11 July 2014

Last elected

2025 Annual Meeting

Status

Independent

Infratil role

Chair (since May 2022)

Qualifications

BMS(Hons), MAppFin

Experience

Alison has over 35 years’ experience in the

infrastructure and financial services sectors.

She has worked in trading, finance and risk

roles for corporates and financial institutions

in Australia, Asia and London.

Previous roles

Group Treasurer at Lion Nathan. Board roles since

2007 have included NZX, Spark, Vero Insurance,

Kiwibank, and Sharesies NZ. Visiting Fellow at

Macquarie University for the Master of Applied

Finance programme for 12 years.

Current roles outside Infratil

Director of Air New Zealand, Sharesies Australia,

ANZ Group Holdings and Australia and New Zealand

Banking Group Ltd.

JASON BOYES

Joined

1 April 2021

Last elected

2024 Annual Meeting

Status

Non-independent

Infratil role

Chief Executive

Qualifications

BCA, LLB(Hons)

Experience

Jason joined Morrison in 2011 after a 15-year

legal career in corporate finance and M&A in

New Zealand and London.

Previous roles

Executive roles as Head of Legal, Chief Commercial

Officer and Chief Financial Officer for Morrison.

Director of various Infratil portfolio companies

(including CDC and Longroad Energy).

Current roles outside Infratil

Jason has an interest in, and is a partner at, Morrison

which has the Management Agreement with Infratil.

ANDREW CLARK

Joined

1 June 2022

Last elected

2025 Annual Meeting

Status

Independent

Infratil role

Non-executive director, Audit & Risk and

Nomination & Remuneration Committees

Qualifications

MBA, BEng, BSc

Experience

Andrew is an experienced strategist and

transformation executive with over 30 years of

diverse management consulting experience.

Previous roles

Senior roles within the Boston Consulting Group

including CEO of ANZ, CEO of Indonesia, APAC

leader of the Corporate Finance and Industrial

Goods practices, APAC Partner Evaluation Chair.

Chief Transformation Officer at NAB.

Current roles outside Infratil

Chair of RESN: Regional Education Support Network

(Australia).

PAUL GOUGH

Joined

5 December 2012

Last elected

2024 Annual Meeting

Status

Independent

Infratil role

Non-executive director, Manager Engagement

and Nomination & Remuneration Committees

Qualifications

BCom(Hons)

Experience

Paul has over 20 years’ experience in international

acquisitions, investment and fund management.

Previous roles

Corporate finance roles with Credit Suisse in New

Zealand, Australia and London. Director of a range

of transport, infrastructure, fund management and

financial-services related businesses.

Current roles outside Infratil

Managing Partner of European private equity fund

STAR Capital focused on the acquisition and

development of asset-based businesses. Director

of STAR Asset Finance, Rail Operations Group,

V Group, ASL Airlines and FlySafair. Founder and

Partner of SURE Capital, a sustainable urban real

estate investor.

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

99
Corporate governanceInfratil Annual Report

Contents

Financial overview

Report of the Chair

Report of the Chief Executive

Management model

Sustainability

Portfolio

Financial performance

Corporate governance

Directory

KIRSTY MACTAGGART

Joined

25 March 2019

Last elected

2025 Annual Meeting

Status

Independent

Infratil role

Non-executive director, Audit & Risk and Nomination

& Remuneration Committees, Chair of Manager

Engagement Committee

Qualifications

BAcc, CA

Experience

Kirsty has over 25 years of global equity market

experience and brings a strong investor perspective

and a focus on governance.

Previous roles

Head of Equity Capital Markets and Corporate

Governance for Fidelity International in Asia.

Managing Director at Citigroup based in Hong Kong

and London.

Current roles outside Infratil

Director of Foundry NZ Limited and Luxury Stays

Limited.

PETER SPRINGFORD

Joined

1 November 2016

Last elected

2023 Annual Meeting

Status

Independent

Infratil role

Non-executive director, Nomination &

Remuneration and Manager Engagement

Committees

Qualifications

MBA

Experience

Peter has extensive experience in managing

companies in Australia, New Zealand and Asia.

Previous roles

President of International Paper (Asia) Limited,

CEO and Managing Director of Carter Holt Harvey

Limited. Chair of Nuplex Industries, Hung Hing

Limited (Hong Kong) and Interplex Holdings Limited

(Singapore). Director of Zespri, Rakon, NZ Refining.

Current roles outside Infratil

Director of several private companies involved in

horticulture, forestry and building

[TRUNCATED]

Data sourced from publicly available filings. Our datasets may not be complete. Automated analysis can produce errors. If you believe any data on this page is incorrect, please contact us at hello@nzxplorer.co.nz. For informational purposes only. Not investment advice.

Other issuers discussed similar conditions around this time

Matched by meaning across NZX announcement text, not keywords — based on our semantic index of announcement bodies.