Infratil Full Year Results for the year ended 31 March 2026
Infratil Limited 5 Market Lane, PO Box 320, Wellington, New Zealand Tel +64-4-473 3663 www.infratil.com
26 May 2026
Infratil delivers 11% earnings lift and confirms strong growth outlook
• Proportionate operational EBITDAF[1] up 11% to NZ$989 million (FY25: NZ$895 million)
• Proportionate capital expenditure up 17% to NZ$2.7 billion (FY25: NZ$2.3 million)
• Total asset value up 13% to NZ$20.6 billion (FY25: NZ$18.3 billion)
• Over NZ$600 million of assets divested to focus on larger-scale growth opportunities
• Net parent surplus of NZ$550 million (FY25: loss of NZ$295 million)
• Final dividend of 13.65cps unimputed; total FY26 dividend of 20.9cps
• Guidance for FY27 Proportionate operational EBITDAF (excluding corporate costs) to
increase 21% at the mid-point vs FY26 $1,114 million, on a like-for-like basis
Infratil (NZX/ASX:IFT) today announced an 11% uplift in earnings to NZ$989 million for FY26, primarily
driven by investments in Australasian data centre business CDC and United States renewable energy
business Longroad Energy. It has also announced a strong growth outlook as both these businesses
convert investment supported by unprecedented sector demand, into a strong trajectory of future
revenue growth.
Infratil Chief Executive Jason Boyes said the infrastructure investor was very pleased to deliver a 13.9%
total shareholder return across FY26, despite ongoing market noise and volatility.
“Demand for efficient AI infrastructure is striking and may be the investment opportunity of a lifetime,”
Mr Boyes said.
“CDC’s announcement in early May of Australasia’s largest ever data centre contract has swept aside
the market ups and downs of FY26, adding approximately 35% of returns since 31 March. CDC has
demonstrated Australasia’s opportunity to attract global computing capacity, supported by regional
stability, competitive build costs and access to renewable energy,” he said.
CDC is now a global scale data centre operator with over one gigawatt of capacity contracted and is
forecasting its EBITDAF will grow more than 150% to over A$1 billion in FY28.
Longroad Energy is also benefitting from the AI thematic, with a project to supply a Meta data centre
and with further opportunities emerging.
Longroad Energy’s EBITDAF increased 170% to US$121 million in FY26 and is forecast to grow
strongly as more generation enters operation. It has lifted its solar and battery projects under
construction to a record 2GW in FY26 which combined with the 3.5GW already in operation, will deliver
total generation capacity equivalent to about half of New Zealand’s current capacity.
With electricity demand in the USA projected to increase by about 30% to 50% by 2040, Infratil has
agreed to provide a further US$300 million to support Longroad’s acceleration over the next two years.
The business is targeting US$1 billion run-rate EBITDAF by CY29/30, based on lifting its development
cadence to ~2GW annually. This is underpinned by the recent acquisition of a very large scale ~2.8GW
solar and battery development project, which is subject to regulatory approvals.
Infratil Limited 5 Market Lane, PO Box 320, Wellington, New Zealand Tel +64-4-473 3663 www.infratil.com
Data centres and renewable energy remain growth focus
Infratil is continually scanning for potential new opportunities to create shareholder value. Mr Boyes
says the strongest of these continue to be in data centres and renewable energy.
“We’re exploring more opportunities to bring power and data centre expertise together — delivering
integrated solutions for customers in a way that is more efficient and at greater scale. Longroad, for
example, has established a dedicated data centre team and is progressing options to develop more
than 4GW of grid-connected data centres, co-located with its solar and battery storage projects.
These options could include simply providing the sites as powered land, or with powered shells
developed by Longroad or with other partners.”
In the United Kingdom, Kao Data is also seeing increased data centre demand and secured a 10-
year agreement with an international neocloud provider for a 22MW deployment. In March, it acquired
a greenfield site at Park Royal in West London which will help accommodate further growth.
Decarbonisation and data centre electricity demand are both drivers for Infratil’s Asian renewable
energy business, Gurīn Energy. In March, its project to deliver solar energy from Indonesia to
Singapore received an Indonesian permit to generate, distribute and sell electricity. However, bilateral
government discussions to enable cross-border renewable energy trade and investment are taking
longer than hoped.
Other sectors largely resilient
Infratil’s telecommunications business, One NZ, increased its free cash flow and its distributions to
Infratil more than doubled, to NZ$180 million in the year. This was a credible performance given the
soft economic conditions in New Zealand and extent of market competition. Total connections on its
mobile network increased to almost 2 million and EonFibre is gaining traction as a wholesale high-
capacity bandwidth provider, having recently secured a material subsea capacity contract with a
hyperscaler.
Wellington Airport also remained resilient, delivering a 2% increase in EBITDAF despite weak
macroeconomic conditions and ongoing domestic airline fleet availability issues reducing total
passenger numbers. Significant investment during the year included a runway safety upgrade to
enable modern widebody aircraft to connect Wellington directly to hubs in Asia.
Australian medical imaging provider Qscan achieved 12% EBITDAF growth despite sector-wide
inflationary pressures. In New Zealand, RHCNZ also completed more scans, but EBITDAF reduced
slightly due to heightened costs and competition.
In Europe, renewable energy business Galileo has seen the value attributed to earlier stage
development projects fall and it has reset its strategy to focus on fewer nearer term projects in a
smaller number of markets.
Infratil Limited 5 Market Lane, PO Box 320, Wellington, New Zealand Tel +64-4-473 3663 www.infratil.com
Divestments and credit rating
Infratil sold more than $600 million of assets over the last year to focus on larger-scale investment
opportunities. A sale process is currently underway for its share of Australian medical imaging
provider Qscan, and last week it sold a NZ$495 million stake in listed investment Contact Energy.
There is the potential for another $1 billion or more of divestments over the medium term as Infratil
assesses the growth outlook and scale opportunities of its existing assets.
An inaugural BBB+ credit rating, assigned by S&P Global Ratings in December 2025, provides Infratil
with further financial flexibility by giving access to new debt markets, improved borrowing terms and
reduced financing costs. Infratil intends to lodge a Product Disclosure Statement for an inaugural offer
of capital bonds today[2] , which are expected to carry a BBB- S&P issue rating and intermediate equity
treatment (50% equity credit).
FY27 guidance and final FY26 dividend
Guidance for FY27:
• Proportionate Operational EBITDAF of NZ$1,300 to $1,400 million (excluding Corporate
Costs) up 21% at the mid-point on FY26 on a like-for-like basis
• Corporate costs of NZ$150 to $170 million
• Proportionate Development Spend of NZ$95 to $110 million
• Proportionate capital expenditure of NZ$3,800 to $4,400 million
Infratil confirmed it will pay an unimputed final dividend of 13.65 cents per share on 29 June 2026,
bringing total FY26 dividends to 20.9 cents per share. The dividend reinvestment plan (DRP)
will operate for the final dividend, with a 2% discount applied to the DRP strike price. A copy of the
DRP Offer Document is included with today’s announcement.
Virtual investor briefing: from 11.00am (NZT) at https://infratil.com/for-investors/results/
Notes:
[1] EBITDAF is an unaudited non-GAAP measure of consolidated net earnings before interest, tax, depreciation,
amortisation, financial derivative movements, impairments, revaluations, and gains or losses on the sale of investments.
EBITDAF also excludes acquisition and sale-related transaction costs, management incentive fees, and one-off project
costs. EBITDAF does not have a standardised meaning and should not be viewed in isolation, nor considered a substitute
for measures reported in accordance with NZ IFRS, as it may not be comparable to similar financial information presented
by other entities. Proportionate Operational EBITDAF represents Infratil’s share of EBITDAF from its investee companies,
excluding Contact Energy. It also excludes corporate costs and early-stage, non-capitalised Development Spend incurred by
Infratil’s early-stage renewables businesses. A reconciliation of net profit after tax to Proportionate EBITDAF is provided in
the FY26 Annual Results Presentation.
[2] Investors can register interest in the offer by contacting a Joint Lead Manager or their usual financial adviser. Indications
of interest will not constitute an obligation or commitment of any kind. No money is currently being sought and applications
for the Capital Bonds cannot currently be made. If Infratil offers the Capital Bonds, the Offer will be made in accordance with
the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013.
Infratil Limited 5 Market Lane, PO Box 320, Wellington, New Zealand Tel +64-4-473 3663 www.infratil.com
Enquiries should be directed to:
Brett Jackson
Infratil Investor Relations Director
Email: brett.jackson@infratil.com
Emma Myers
Communications Manager
Email: media@morrisonglobal.com
Authorised for release by:
Andrew Carroll
Infratil Chief Financial Officer
---
ANNUAL
RESULTS
PRESENTATION
FOR THE
YEAR ENDED
31 MARCH 2026
This presentation has been prepared by Infratil Limited (NZ company number 597366, NZX:IFT; ASX:IFT) (the ‘Company’)
To the maximum extent permitted by law, the Company, its affiliates and each of their respective affiliates, related bodies corporate, directors, officers, partners, employees and agents will not be liable
(whether in tort (including negligence) or otherwise) to you or any other person in relation to this presentation.
Information
This presentation contains summary information about the Company and its activities which is current as at the date of this presentation. The information in this presentation is of a general nature and does
not purport to be complete nor does it contain all the information which a prospective investor may require in evaluating a possible investment in the Company or that would be required in a product
disclosure statement under the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013 or the Australian Corporations Act 2001 (Cth). This presentation should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Annual Report for
the period ended 31 March 2026, market releases and other periodic and continuous disclosure announcements, which are available at www.nzx.com, www.asx.com.au or infratil.com/for-investors/.
Not financial product advice
This presentation is for information purposes only and is not financial, legal, tax, investment or other advice or a recommendation to acquire the Company’s securities and has been prepared without taking
into account the objectives, financial situation or needs of prospective investors.
Future Performance
This presentation may contain certain “forward-looking statements” about the Company and the environment in which the Company operates, such as indications of, and guidance on, future earnings,
financial position and performance. Forward-looking information is inherently uncertain and subject to contingencies outside of the Company’s control, and the Company gives no representation, warranty
or assurance that actual outcomes or performance will not materially differ from the forward-looking statements.
Non-GAAP Financial Information
This presentation contains certain financial information and measures that are “non-GAAP financial information” under the FMA Guidance Note on disclosing non-GAAP financial information, "non‐IFRS
financial information" under Regulatory Guide 230: ‘Disclosing non‐IFRS financial information’ published by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) and are not recognised under New
Zealand equivalents to International Financial Reporting Standards (NZ IFRS), Australian Accounting Standards (AAS) or International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). The non-IFRS/GAAP financial
information and financial measures include Proportionate EBITDAF, EBITDAF and EBITDA. The non-IFRS/GAAP financial information and financial measures do not have a standardised meaning prescribed
by the NZ IFRS, AAS or IFRS, should not be viewed in isolation and should not be construed as an alternative to other financial measures determined in accordance with NZ IFRS, AAS or IFRS, and therefore,
may not be comparable to similarly titled measures presented by other entities. Although Infratil believes the non-IFRS/GAAP financial information and financial measures provide useful information to
users in measuring the financial performance and condition of Infratil, you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any non-IFRS/GAAP financial information or financial measures included in this
presentation.
EBITDAF represents consolidated net earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, amortisation, financial derivative movements, impairments, revaluations, and gains or losses on the sale of investments.
EBITDAF also excludes acquisition and sale-related transaction costs, management incentive fees, and one-off project costs. Proportionate Operational EBITDAF represents Infratil’s share of EBITDAF from
its investee companies, excluding development spend associated with earlier-stage renewables businesses (Gurīn Energy, Galileo, and Mint Renewables), and excluding corporate costs and listed
company Contact Energy. Development Spend represents early-stage, non-capitalised expenditure incurred by Infratil’s earlier-stage renewables businesses. Further information on how Infratil calculates
Proportionate EBITDAF can be found in the Appendix.
No part of this presentation may be reproduced or provided to any person or used for any other purpose without express permission.
DISCLAIMER
1
AGENDA
INFRATIL ANNUAL RESULTS PRESENTATION
P O R T F O L I O O V E R V I E W & F U L L Y E A R H I G H L I G H T S
P O R T F O L I O P E R F O R M A N C E
G R O U P F I N A N C I A L P E R F O R M A N C E
Supporting MATERIALS
S U P P O R T I N G M AT E R I A L S
PA G E 3
PA G E 21
PA G E 27
PA G E 8
PORTFOLIO STRATEGY OUTLOOK
P O R T F O L I O S T R AT E GY & O U T L O O K
PA G E 31
2
ANNUAL
RESULTS
PRESENTATION
PORTFOLIO
OVERVIEW & FULL
YEAR HIGHLIGHTS
-50
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
550
600
650
FY16FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
Infratil (IFT.NZX, IFT.ASX)
•Market capitalisation of NZ$16.0bn
1
(US$9.3bn)
•Included in S&P NZX 50, ASX 200, and
MSCI Global Standard Index
•Our target: shareholder returns of 11-15% per annum
on a rolling 10-year basis
A value-add infrastructure investment company
•Active portfolio construction and management with
multiple pillars of value creation over time
•Management partnership leverages Morrison’s
extensive global capabilities
A strong track record: 18.9% TSR
2
since 1994
3
Cumulative annual return (%)
Period
2
IFT TSR
5 – year 18.5%
10 – year21.0%
20 – year 15.1%
Since inception18.9%
Notes: (1) Market capitalisation as at 25 May 2026; (2) Infratil Returns are calculated to 25 May 2026; (3) Chart source: Capital IQ
(NZX50, ASX 200).
An infrastructure investment company that actively invests in ideas that matter
INFRATIL OVERVIEW
IFT
NZX50
ASX200
4
PORTFOLIO UPDATE
A diverse portfolio with significant growth opportunities
Portfolio changes
•Manawa Energy sold July 2025
•Contact Energy stake received July 2025
•RetireAustralia sold December 2025
•Infratil Property sold December 2025
•Anytime Radiology established December 2025
•Fortysouth sold April 2026
Portfolio composition (31 March 2026
1
)
Notes: (1) Based on a combination of independent valuation, market and book value. Chart excludes Fortysouth following its
subsequent sale.
5
Despite continued market ‘noise’, Proportionate Operational EBITDAF of $989.4 million was delivered, up 11% on FY25 and
towards the top end of the $960–$1,000 million guidance range
CDC nowa global scale data centre operator, with more than 1GW of contracted capacity and growth outlook supporting a
step change in future earnings. Its Moody’s Baa2 (stable) public credit rating provides additional flexibility to fund growth
Longroad Energy's growth is accelerating, supported by strong demand drivers and opportunities to scale. Developments
in other markets are taking more time (Gurīn Energy), or proving more challenging (Galileo)
Our largest New Zealand businesseswere resilient, with Wellington Airport and One NZ delivering positive EBITDAF
growth despite challenging market conditions in their respective sectors
On track to achieve the initial $1 billion divestment target, with $600 million of assets sold and a sale process underway for
Qscan. Post balance date, a $500 million stake in Contact has been sold to support future growth
Infratil’s inaugural S&P BBB+ (stable) credit rating gives access to new debt markets, improved borrowing terms and
reduced financing costs
Strong ESG performance is translating into higher ratings, such as MSCI AA, and inclusion in additional indices, including
the Dow Jones Best in Class Australia Index
Delivering growth in volatile markets
FY26 HIGHLIGHTS
6
(200)02004006008001,0001,200
FY24
FY25
FY26
05,00010,00015,00020,00025,000
FY24
FY25
FY26
Notes: (1) FY26 Proportionate operational EBITDAF includes corporate costs for the purposes of comparison to guidance and excludes
discontinued operations; (2) Assets are valued at either independent valuations, book values, or market values.
Portfolio momentum evident in key financial metrics
FY26 FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
$989 million
Proportionate Operational EBITDAF
1
$2.7 billion
Proportionate Capital Expenditure
$20.6 billion
Total Asset Value
$16.26 per share
Net Asset Value (post management fees)
20.9 cents per share
FY26 Dividend Declared
11%
17%
13%
5%
2%
CDC
One NZ
Kao Data
Longroad Energy
Contact Energy
Other renewables
Healthcare
Wellington Airport
Sold
Other
Corporate
Proportionate Operational EBITDAF
1
(NZ$m)
Asset value
2
(NZ$m)
7
ANNUAL
RESULTS
PRESENTATION
PORTFOLIO
PERFORMANCE
220
200
200
400
CDC Contracted Capacity (ICT MW)
1
Earnings step-change underway with over 1GW now contracted
CDC
FY26FY27FY28FY29Total
1GW+
Year in Review
•FY26 EBITDAF of A$393m, up A$63m (19%) from FY25
–220MW of invoiced ICT capacity at FY26 end
–555MW contract signed on 5 May lifts contracted ICT capacity
to 1GW+
–FY26 capex of A$2.11bn, up from A$1.76bn in FY25
–353MW of built operating capacity added during the year
–572MW under construction at FY26 end
–Capex per ICT MW varies by site, with current $/MW averages in
the mid-teens (excluding land)
•Well-capitalised balance sheet supports ongoing growth
–All major shareholders contributed A$500m in February 2026 to
support current growth plans
–CDC Australia assigned a public Baa2 credit rating (stable outlook)
on 21 April 2026
–FY26 actual weighted average cost of debt of ~6%
–Mandate announced for a hybrid AMTN wholesale bond on
25 May 2026
Notes: (1) MW expected to be invoiced by the end of each financial year. Timing for conversion of contracted capacity to billing is subject
to both site completion and customer activation.
9
Unprecedented demand continues, strong outlook for further growth
CDC
Outlook
•EBITDAF¹ expected to step up significantly as contracted capacity
comes online
–FY27 EBITDAF guidance of A$680m–A$720m
–EBITDAF expected to exceed A$1bn in FY28, subject to build
delivery timing and customer activation
–Fully deployed 1GW of contracted capacity is expected to deliver
~A$2bn of annualised contracted EBITDAF
•Capex steps up and continued development of the future pipeline
–FY27 capex guidance of A$3.8bn–A$4.2bn (excluding land), with
disciplined capital deployment aligned to revenue generation
–Ongoing acquisition of power and land to meet customer demand
–Densification also expected to support further capacity growth as
customer requirements and site opportunities evolve
•Growth outlook and demand remains very strong
–Contracting discussions progressing well for signings in H1 FY27
and beyond for further medium and large-scale deployments
–Actively progressing 1GW+ extension of growth pipeline to
accommodate future demand
EBITDAF
1
Growth (A$m)
271
330
392
FY24FY25FY26FY27GFY28F
680-720
$1bn+
+155%
Notes: (1) EBITDAF includes the straight-lining of lease revenue for contracts with fixed indexation over the term of the arrangement.
10
Well positioned to capture an outsized share of ongoing growth
CDC
Contracted earnings visibility and premium customer base
•Contracted earnings provide strong visibility over future cash flows
•Customer base dominated by government and hyperscale counterparties
Scale and efficient development economics
•Benefits from scale and demand-driven modular development
•Densification and technology evolution support attractive returns
Superior access to funding
•IG credit rating supports efficient pricing and broad access to debt markets
•Supportive long-term institutional shareholders committed to growth
Technology and sustainability advantage
•Design supports increased computing density and liquid cooling solutions
•Minimal water usage is a key differentiator in site development
237MW
Sydney
308MW
156MW
Canberra
20MW
181MW
Melbourne
210MW
98MW
Auckland
34MW
Perth
Data Centres
Under construction572MW
Operating capacity671MW
6715721,663
05001,0001,5002,0002,5003,000
Operating capacityUnder constructionFuture build
2.9GW capacity pipeline as at 31 March
1
Notes: (1) Built MW.
11
Delivering strong earnings growth as construction lifts to record 2GW
LONGROAD ENERGY
Year in Review
•EBITDAF of US$121m, up US$76m (170%) from FY25, including
contributions from Serrano (434MW, from April 25) and
Sun Streams 4 (677MW, from March 25)
•Opco run-rate EBITDAF of US$367m up US$93m (34%) from FY25
•3.5GW operational at FY26 end, with a further 2GW under
construction including:
–Sun Pond (Arizona solar + storage, 197MW, COD
1
achieved
in April 2026)
–1,000 Mile (Texas solar, 400MW, COD CY26)
–Milford Solar 2 (Utah solar, 392MW, COD CY27)
–Big Creek (Arkansas solar, 533MW, COD CY27)
•A further 1.7GW is expected to commence construction in FY27
•>6GW of projects qualified for tax credits, to support our
development targets out to 2030
–Solar projects required to be placed in service by the end of 2030
to maintain eligibility
–Battery storage tax credits accessible through 2037
Notes: (1) Commercial Operation Date; (2) Opco run-rate EBITDAF is calculated based on the five-year average EBITDAF once projects reach operational
status. Projects are included in Opco run-rate EBITDAF based on the year of financial close, with all corporate overheads and development-related costs added
back; (3) addback of all Longroad corporate overheads and development-related expenses, as well as normalisation for differences between actual operating
performance and the expected five-year average, and adjustments for non-controlling interests in projects.
FY26 EBITDAF to Opco run-rate EBITDAF
2
(US$m)
GenerationSolarBatteryWindTransmission
Operating assets2.3GW0.7GW0.5GW-
Under construction1.7GW0.2GW0.1GW
45
121
367
40
144
62
FY25 EBITDAFFY26 EBITDAFCorporate
overheads &
Development
expenses
3
Projects under
construction
OpCo run-rate
EBITDAF FY26
102
Corporate
Development
12
490
640
770
860
70
140
CY25CY26FCY27FCY28FCY29F
350
840
1,000
New very large-scale project, robust demand ups annual cadence to avg. 2GW p.a.
LONGROAD ENERGY
•Following years of modest growth in U.S. electricity consumption,
demand is projected to increase by ~30-50% by 2040, driven by
data centres, electrification, and growth in domestic manufacturing
1
•In April, agreed to acquire a ~2.8GW solar + storage project, which
would deliver targeted uptick in development cadence on its own:
–PPA in place; expected to begin construction in two phases in
CY28 and CY29
–progress contingent on state regulatory approval of the
acquisition and PPA, and land lease extension which is subject
to federal approval
•CY25 target projects contracted or in late stage discussions, with
ongoing robust demand, >6GW tax qualified pipeline and new very
large-scale project underpinning our targeted increase in
development cadence to reach US$1 billion in run rate earnings by
CY29/30
New data centre strategy
•Actively progressing options to develop 4GW+ of grid connected
data centres co-located with Longroad solar + storage projects.
Options to develop powered shell, alone or with partners, or
monetise as powered land
Opco run-rate EBITDAF
2
Notes: (1) Source: American Clean Power Association; (2) Opco run-rate EBITDAF is calculated based on the five-year average EBITDAF once projects reach
operational status. Projects are included in Opco run-rate EBITDAF based on the year of financial close, with all corporate overheads and development-
related costs added back. (3) An additional 2GW has been evenly spread over CY28 and CY29 to reflect targeted upsize in development cadence.
GenerationCY25CY26FCY27FCY28F
3
CY29F
3
Operating assets3.5GW4.2GW5.9GW6.4GW8.0GW
Under construction1.8GW2.9GW2.8GW4.8GW5.7GW
Total Portfolio5.3GW7.1GW8.7GW11.2GW13.7GW
Annual growth forecast+1.5GW+1.8GW+1.6GW+2.5GW+2.5GW
Illustrative impact of increasing avg. cadence to 2.0GW p.a.
September 25 investor day Opco run-rate EBITDAF guidance
13
Under construction
3
Operating
3
2,347MW
Solar
1,665MW
729MW
Battery
210MW
458MW
Wind
Transmission
100MW
Infratilhas agreed to invest further US$300m to supportLongroad’s acceleration
LONGROAD ENERGY
Arizona
111MW
1,093MW
729MW
85MW
Texas
121MW
723MW
400MW
Arkansas
533MW
New Mexico
67MW
Minnesota
31MW
California
282MW
98MW
75MW
Maine
184MW
50
20
210
80
FY27F EBITDAFCorporate overheads
& Development
expenses
2
Full year contribution
from projects
comissioned in year
Projects under
construction
OpCo run-rate
EBITDAF FY27F
120 - 135
490
130
FY27F EBITDAF to Opco run-rate EBITDAF
Guidance
•FY27 EBITDAF guidance of US$120m–US$135m
1
. Modest uplift
as constructioncompletes in the back end of FY27 and in FY28,
and due to increased development expenses
•FY27 Opco run-rate EBITDAF on track for ~US$490m across the
7.1GW operating and under construction fleet
Funding
•Infratil has agreed to provide an additional US$300m of equity
funding to support Longroad’s acceleration, to be deployed over
the next ~2 years
Notes: (1) Guidance prepared in alignment with the Infratil financial year of 31 March 2027; (2) addback of all Longroad corporate overheads and
development-related expenses, as well as normalisation for differences between actual operating performance and the expected five-year average, and
adjustments for non-controlling interests in projects; (3) Total figures include rounding.
Utah
522MW
306MW
50MW
100MW
14
Corporate
Development
GURIN ENERGY GALILEO
Project Vanda awaiting key approval Market headwinds encourage a reset
•Project Vanda: Indonesia to Singapore utility-scale solar
–Land secured for solar ~2GW + ~1GW battery
–Indonesia granted production licence in March; still awaiting
export licence as key gate to final investment decision
–Ownership: 75% Gurīn Energy; 25% Gentari
–Expected capex US$2-3bn, requiring ~US$500m equity
•Malaysia: projects for data centre supply opportunities
•Philippines: Zambales 75MW solar delivered US$6m revenue;
Tarlac 39MW project expected to be operational Q3 FY27
•Japan: 240MW battery storage project reached ready-to-build
status
•South Korea: acquired 300MW wind + solar pipeline
•Many individual European markets reaching maturity
–Moving away from high values for earlier stage projects
–Targeted returns more difficult to achieve at any point in the project
lifecycle
•Strategy reset in H2 FY26 to position Galileo as an independentpower
producer and take projects through construction and operations
–Focus on fewer markets where power demand, power prices,
connection conditions and regulation allow pipeline deployment at
attractive returns
–Focus on sales in other markets to allow capital recycling and
focused effort
•Write-offs and write-downs of €61.2 million (IFT share €23.3 million)
recognised to reflect a narrower strategic focus and reduced values of
early-stage projects
•Target is 700–900MW operational, or in construction, by 2030
–First project operational: 3MW solar in Lombardy, Italy
–Second Lombardy 5MW solar project starting construction
Notes: (1) Prior to shareholder equity injections.
15
Delivering revenue growth in a challenging market
ONE NZ
Year in Review
•EBITDAF +$4m to $609m with mobile momentum
balancingincreased costs and strategic spend
•Mobile performing well in higher-value segments
–Mobile connections grew, lifting network utilisation
–Postpaid expansion; mobile ARPU $36.60 vs $35.50 (FY25)
–One Wallet phone redemptions up ~5x vs FY25, reducing churn
–Handset & Other revenue +$74m
•5G up to 70% pop. coverage: 3G network exit unlocks spectrum
•EonFibre's first full year of operation, delivering ~$65m EBITDAF
•IT investment and simplification continuing to drive benefits
–Free cash flow +$67m vs FY25, with reduced capex
andinvestment, andinclusive of one-off property incentives
–$183m distributions to IFT made up of $159m of shareholder
loan interest and repayments and $24m of subvention payments
(up from $91 million in FY25)
801
831
847
424
325
399
212
223
225
212
203
202
348
340
325
FY24FY25FY26
1,996
1,921
1,998
Consumer FixedEnterpriseWholesaleHandset & OtherMobile
1,982
1,963
1,979
379
364
347
FY24FY25FY26
2,361
2,3272,325
Fixed connectionsMobile Connections
Revenue (NZ$m)
Connections (000’s)
16
Ongoing focus on delivery and simplification
ONE NZ
Outlook
•NZ markets remain low growth, with weak net migration and ongoing
macroeconomic headwinds
–Enterprise and fixed markets challenging
–Annual price increase implemented across mobile + fixed in April
•EonFibre gaining traction as wholesale high-capacity
bandwidth provider, with good data centre demandand a material
hyperscaler contract (subsea) in Q4 FY26
•Investment in mobile growth, IT and AI-first initiatives continues,
accompanied by careful cost discipline
–50+ AI solutions in operation; focus on short-term payback
Guidance
•FY27 EBITDAF $600m to $640m
–Target: EBITDAF margin mid-30% in medium term through mobile
growth, increased wholesale revenues, simplification and cost
efficiency
•FY27 capex $235m to $265m (excl. spectrum)
–Target: capex intensity ~11% in medium term as network and IT
modernisation spend tapers
600
605
609
30%
31%
30%
37
61
128
82
91
183
FY24FY25FY26
Free cash flowDistributions
Notes: (1) For free cash flow calculation refer to the Detailed Financial Information & Operating Metrics – March 2026 disclosure.
Free cash flow (NZ$m) & Distributions (NZ$m)
EBITDAF (NZ$m) & Margin (%)
17
FY24FY25FY26
Resilient EBITDAF in challenging domestic market
WELLINGTON AIRPORT
Year in Review
•EBITDAF increased 2.3% to $133m, supported by strong international
growth, further diversification of commercial operations, disciplined
cost control, and higher aeronautical pricing
•International passengers grew 4% to 823k (FY25: 791k)
•Domestic passengers declined 6% to 4.26m (FY25: 4.53m), reflecting
a weak economy and airline capacity constraints
•$112m invested in infrastructure, including the runway safety upgrade
(completed March), a new 800-space car park, a new fire station, and
enhanced terminal hospitality areas
Outlook
•FY27 EBITDAF guidance $130m to $140 million
•Runway safety upgrade enables long-haul flights to Asia and beyond
•MoU signed with Guangzhou Baiyun International Airport (China) to
explore partnership opportunities
•Despite easing capacity constraints, fuel cost pressures are limiting
expansion, with airlines scaling back domestic schedules amid
ongoing Middle East uncertainty
Passengers (m)
0.7
0.80.8
4.74.5
4.3
FY24FY25FY26
5.4
5.3
5.1
Passengers DomesticPassengers International
107
130
133
71%
FY24
74%
FY25
74%
FY26
EBITDAF (NZ$m) & Margin (%)
18
Doubled contracted capacity, new prime London site added
KAO DATA
Year in Review
•Revenue
1
of £48m, up 28% from £38m in FY25 as previously
contracted capacity came online
–EBITDAF of £4.7m, up 9% (£0.4m) from FY25
•Operating capacity increased from 29MW to 37MW, with additions
at Harlow and Slough
•Construction of KLON-03 (17.6MW) progressing, designed for
GPU-driven AI workloads and rack densities up to 130kW, with
capacity online from early 2027
•Strong contracting momentum, with materially all operating and
under construction capacity contracted at year-end, including
KLON-03
Outlook
•London market remains constrained by land and power,
supporting pricing and development value
•With all current capacity contracted, Kao acquired a 4.7-acre West
London greenfield site for development
–New 30MW+ West London site targeted for 2029 delivery, in a
prime availability zone expected to attract broad demand,
including hyperscale customers
23
29
37
26
18
64
72
106
9
FY24FY25FY26
96
127
161
Future buildUnder constructionOperating
Kao Data built capacity pipeline (MW)
25
38
48
Revenue
1
(£m)
Notes: (1) Excludes energy pass through revenue.
19
FY24FY25FY26
HEALTHCARE
•EBITDAF of $121m, down 4% ($5m) from
FY25
1
–1.02m scans completed, up from 1.01m
–Radiologist workforce: 170 (up 6)
–Standalone clinics: 66 (down 6)
•Cost and competition pressures, together
with a mix shift to lower margin work drove
the reduction in EBITDAF
•Performance improvement
programme focused on pricing, productivity
and cost-saving initiatives
•Focus on supporting public and private
healthcare systems as imaging demand
continues to grow
•FY27 EBITDAF guidance of NZ$115-$135m
•EBITDAF of A$87m, up 12% (A$10m) from FY25
1
–1.5m scans completed, up from 1.45m
–Radiologist workforce: 192 (up 28)
–Standalone clinics: 80 (up 6)
•Earnings growth supported by rising
demand, pricing discipline, higher margin
work and strong execution
•Expanded footprint and capability through
organic growth and integrating seven
practices
•Investing in advanced imaging and digital
tools, including AI-enabled reporting, to
improve productivity and clinical outcomes
•Business performing strongly, providing a
solid base for the strategic review currently
underway; update expected in H1 FY27
•FY27 EBITDAF guidance of A$90-$105m
•Standalone teleradiology provider established
from RHCNZ and Qscan
•Dedicated management team alongside Infratil
and doctor shareholders
•Pure-play teleradiology model servicing 57
acute hospitals across Australasia
•Provides dedicated capacity for urgent and
overflow studies, improving utilisation and
reporting throughput
•Well positioned to benefit from ongoing
technology advances, including AI
•Active discussions with public and private
counterparties to grow third-party revenue
•First full quarter of operations materially in line
with forecast and investment case
•Expected to deliver annual EBITDAF of
~A$10m
Note: (1) EBITDAF has been presented aligned to FY26 guidance.
20
ANNUAL
RESULTS
PRESENTATION
GROUP FINANCIAL
PERFORMANCE
Increased operational capacity at CDC and Longroad drove EBITDAF growth in FY26
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE HIGHLIGHTS
47
3
50
2
2
1
CDCOne NZLongroad
Energy
Qscan
Group
Wellington
Airport
Other
(12)
Corporate
989
FY26
EBITDAF
895
FY25
EBITDAF
Notes: (1) Further information on how Infratil calculates Proportionate EBITDAF can be found in the supporting materials including a
reconciliation to net profit after tax; (2) excludes EBITDAF contributions from Manawa Energy, RetireAustralia, Fortysouth and Infratil Property.
$2,687 million
Up 17% from FY25
Proportionate capital expenditure
($70 million)
Up 2% from FY25
Proportionate development spend
$1,336 million
Up 42% from FY25
Infratil investment
$549.8 million
Up $845m from FY25
Net parent surplus
Highlights
•Proportionate operational EBITDAF was $989.4m, up $94.1m
(10.5%) on FY25, as CDC and Longroad capacity growth drove
increased contributions
•Proportionate development spend was $70.1m, up $1.5m
(2.2%) on FY25 reflecting continued spend across renewables
development platforms
•Proportionate capex was $2.7bn, up $392.2m (17.1%) on
FY25, driven by increased expenditure at CDC and Kao Data,
partially offset by decreases at One NZ and Longroad
•Infratil direct investment was $1.3bn, up $397.2m (42.3%) on
FY25. The largest investment in the period was $556m into
CDC reflecting completion of our increased shareholding and
subsequent funding of future growth.
Proportionate Operational EBITDAF
2
(NZ$m)
22
Growth reflects growth performance alongside continued equity investment
VALUATION UPDATE
1,685
31
164
606
277
60
22
136
114
137
35
AnytimeQscan Group
(73)
Mint RenewablesGurīn EnergyGalileo
(69)
Longroad EnergyContact EnergyKao DataOne NZ
(327)
CDC
FY25
portfolio
asset
value
18,304
FortySouth
3
(477)
Clearvision VenturesDivested asets
2
FY26
portfolio
asset
value
Wellington AirportRHCNZ
20,624
Movements in Infratil’s share of valuations
•Infratil’s total asset value increased to $20.6bn, up $2.3bn on
FY25, including$1.3bn investment by Infratil
•CDC’s valuation increased $1.7bn, including the acquisition of
an additional 1.58% in early FY25 and A$250m capital
injection in February 2026
•One NZ’s valuation reduced by $327m, reflecting
macroeconomic and competitive conditions
•Contact Energy replaced Manawa Energy in the portfolio (July
2025) with another 4.92% acquired in October 2025
•Longroad’s valuation increased $277m, driven by new
operational capacity
•Galileo decreased $69m reflecting softening values across
early-stage development projects, with write-downs/offs of
projects across its pipeline partially offset by $53m of equity
contributions (IFT share)
•RHCNZ decreased $73m, reflecting challenging trading and
revised long term growth assumptions
Asset Valuations (NZ$m)
1
Notes: (1) Reflecting Infratil’s share of valuations as at 31 March 2026. Based on a combination of independent valuation, market and
book value; (2) Divested assets includes RetireAustralia and Infratil Property; (3) Fortysouth was divested in April 2026.
23
Moderate dividend growth balanced with capital needs of the portfolio
DIVIDEND
13.00
7.00
FY24
13.25
7.25
FY25
13.65
7.25
FY26
Final dividendInterim dividend
Final Dividend
•13.65 cents per share, with no imputation credits attached
•Record date: 10 June 2026 (ex-dividend date:9 June)
•Payment date: 29 June 2026
•NZD/AUD rate to be set on 10 June 2026 and announced on
11 June 2026
Dividend reinvestment plan (DRP)
•Available for the final FY26 dividend with 2% discount
•DRP elections must be made by 11 June 2026
•10-day VWAP period is 12 to 25 June 2026 (inclusive)
•Strike price announced 26 June 2026
Infratil net dividend (cents per share)
24
Investment grade profile unlocks material benefits and resilience
FUNDING AND LIQUIDITY
156
102
146
273
365
204
123
371
500
371
175
107
625
4
120
220
232
FY27FY28FY29FY30FY31FY32FY33>FY33
BondsBank Debt DrawnBank Debt UndrawnAcquisition FacilitiesIFTHA
Highlights
•Inaugural S&P BBB+ (stable) credit rating secured in December 2025,
enables reduced funding costs and broader access to diverse capital
sources
•Bank debt refinance completed in May 2026, realising cost savings
and improved terms that enhance financial flexibility
•Infratil intends to lodge a PDS for an inaugural offer of capital bonds
today, which are expected to carry a BBB- S&P issue rating and
intermediate equity treatment (50% equity credit). Enhances funding
flexibility and supports investment grade credit profile of Infratil
•Further activity expected to diversify funding sources, adding long-
term balance sheet resilience
•Investment grade rating is expected to deliver savings of ~$7m per
annum in FY27, increasing to ~$10m over time.
•$1.1 billion of available liquidity supports future growth, further
enhanced by ~$495m of proceeds realised post balance date from
Contact Energy partial sell-down
Capital Bonds PDS: Investors can register interest in the offer by contacting a Joint Lead
Manager or their usual financial adviser. Indications of interest will not constitute an
obligation or commitment of any kind. No money is currently being sought and
applications for the Capital Bonds cannot currently be made. If Infratil offers the Capital
Bonds, the Offer will be made in accordance with the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013.
Notes: (1) Funding and Liquidity metrics are based on the methodologies set out on slide 41, aligned to S&P treatment. Net debt includes
pro forma adjustment for unconditional Fortysouth divestment proceeds receivable at 31 March 2026.
Funding and Liquidity (NZ$m)
1
Debt maturity profile (NZ$m)
25
725
2265
2188
2988
89
135
151
161
1492
820
1438
1109
8%
17%
13%
15%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
18%
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
FY23FY24FY25FY26
Net debtRecourse letters of credit issuedLiquidity availableLoan to Value
FY27 Proportionate Operational EBITDAF guidance range set at NZ$1,300 to $1,400 million
FY27 GUIDANCE
Capital Expenditure (100%)
Component Guidance
CDCA$3,800-$4,200m
One NZNZ$235-$265m
Kao Data£175-£195m
Longroad EnergyUS$1,500-$1,700m
Wellington AirportNZ$50-$80m
RHCNZ
NZ$30-$50m (IFT Share)
Qscan Group
Gurīn, Galileo, and MintNZ$115-$135m (IFT Share)
Notes: (1) Guidance is based on Infratil management’s current expectations and assumptions about trading performance, is subject to risks
and uncertainties, and dependent on prevailing market conditions continuing throughout the outlook period.
EBITDAF (100%)Component Guidance
CDCA$680-$720m
One NZNZ$600-$640m
Longroad EnergyUS$120-$135m
RHCNZNZ$115-$135m
Qscan GroupA$90-$105m
Wellington AirportNZ$130-$140m
Development SpendNZ$95-$110m (IFT share)
Corporate costsNZ$150-$170m
Guidance
•Proportionate Operational EBITDAF guidance range of:
NZ$1,300–NZ$1,400 million
–An increase of ~21% on FY26 on a like-for-like basis
–Proportionate Operational EBITDAF guidance has been prepared
excluding Corporate Costs
•Proportionate Development Spend guidance range of:
NZ$95–NZ$110 million
–An increase of ~46% on FY26
•Corporate costs guidance range of NZ$150-NZ$170 million,
•Proportionate Capital Expenditure guidance range of
$3,800 million - $4,400 million
–An increase of ~53% on FY26 on a like-for-like basis
•Forecast exchange rates to NZD used in setting Group guidance:
AUD 0.8382, USD 0.5769, EUR 0.4958, and GBP 0.4368
26
ANNUAL
RESULTS
PRESENTATION
PORTFOLIO
STRATEGY &
OUTLOOK
Portfolio Health and Safety
•No fatalities
•LTIFR
2
0.6; TRIFR
2
1.2, in line with FY25
CDC
•WUE less than 0.02
•100% renewable electricity offered
Portfolio coverage SBTi
•Target: 60% by 2028
•As at 31 March 2026: 23.4%
Longroad Energy
•14 weeks paid parental leave
•29 burrowing owls fledged
Community investment
•Proportionate portfolio investment,
including Infratil: $2.4m
One NZ
•1st rooftop solar project
•91t operational e-waste, 99% recycled
Notes: (1) Visit Infratil's website for: Climate Related Disclosures, Modern Slavery Report, and ESG Data Book; (2) Total Recordable Injury
and Loss Time Injury Frequency Rates, based on 200,000 hours on a weighted average basis by employees.
SUSTAINABILITY HIGHLIGHTS
ESG Rating uplift driven by disclosure and delivery
Rating bodyLatest
rating
Previous
rating
GRESB9486
MSCI ESGAAA
S&P CSA3823
Sustainalytics ESG Risk6.68.5
Forsyth Barr Climate & ESGA-B+
CDPBC
External Ratings Assessments
28
Inclusion in S&P Dow Jones
Best in Class Australia Index
Solid progress against strategy
MEDIUM-TERM STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES
Divest businesses unlikely to scale
under our ownership and reinvest
•$600m of sales completed; Qscan process underway
•Potential for another $1 billion+ of divestments over the medium term
Balance Infratil’s cash flow and
dividends
•On track with One NZ's improved distributionprofile; growth expected from
CDC and Longroad as earnings and future distribution capacity grows
Identify and scale our growth
platforms beyond CDC and
Longroad Energy
•CDC and Longroad have accelerated materially, setting a high bar; however
interesting adjacent opportunities are emerging across these platforms
•Gurīn Energy still awaiting key approval
Continue to broaden our
shareholder base and support
future scale
•ASX 200 inclusion has seen ASX trading volume lift to ~30%
•Increased analyst coverage helping grow interest, work in progress
29
CDC has a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to develop AI infrastructure at globally relevant scale, with strong
demand, project pipeline, capability and funding flexibility to continue to accelerate
Longroad is also capitalising on the opportunity, targeting increased development and US$1bn run-rate
EBITDAF by CY29/30, backed by new very large-scale project, subject to regulatory approvals
Continuing to develop other potentially material growth opportunities including Longroad’s data centre
options and Gurin’s Vanda project
Infratil has significant flexibility to support that growth, supported by improved cash flow profile, ongoing
divestment programme and inaugural S&P BBB+ credit rating
Continued focus on lifting operational performance across the portfolio, with strong progress by One NZ
and Qscan, and improvement plans in place for RHCNZ and Galileo
We have navigated the noise of 2025, are realistic about the challenges that persist, and are as positive as
ever about the opportunities and options for the portfolio ahead
Portfolio positioning for further step changes in growth
LOOKING AHEAD
30
SUPPORTING
MATERIALS
1
1
2
5
4
3
1
2
4
3
United States: 13%Europe: 5%Asia: 3%Australia: 47%New Zealand: 32%
1
3
4
3
21
5
22
4
1
1
1
2
3
3
ASSET LOCATIONS
32
NET ASSET VALUES
Commentary
•The table represents Infratil’s proportionate share of an asset's
independent valuation, market value, or book value
•CDC, One NZ, Kao Data, Longroad Energy, Galileo, Gurīn Energy, Mint
Renewables, RHCNZ Medical Imaging, Qscan Group, and Wellington
Airport reflect the midpoint 31 March 2026 independent valuations
•The fair value of Contact Energy is shown based on the market price of
$9.25 as at 31 March 2026, based on Infratil’s shareholding at that date
•Clearvision and Anytime Radiology reflect their accounting book values
as at 31 March 2026
•The carrying value of Fortysouth reflects the final sale price, which
completed in April 2026
•An illustrative estimate of thepresent value of the management
agreement is presented here, based on an assumption that Infratil’s
total shareholder return is in the middle of its target return range of 11 –
15%, withincentive fees on international assets calculated to accrue at
the same rate. These fees are discounted over a 5 year period.
1
31 March ($Millions)20252026
CDC$7,248.5 $8,933.2
One NZ$3,713.5 $3,386.7
FortySouth$186.3 $217.0
Kao Data$701.6 $865.4
Manawa Energy$788.8 -
Contact Energy- $1,394.5
Longroad Energy$2,111.9 $2,389.3
Galileo$326.0 $257.1
Gurīn Energy$493.0 $553.3
Mint Renewables$22.8 $44.8
RHCNZ Medical Imaging$689.3 $616.4
Qscan Group$454.5 $590.1
Anytime Radiology-$114.0
RetireAustralia$404.3 -
Wellington Airport$933.9 $1,070.7
Clearvision Ventures$156.2 $191.5
Property$73.1 -
Portfolio asset value$18,303.7 $20,624.0
Wholly owned group net debt($2,187.8)($3,204.6)
PV of management agreement($1,128.5)($1,168.4)
Net asset value$14,987.4 $16,251.0
Shares on issue (m)968.1 999.3
Net asset value per share$15.48 $16.26
33
Notes: (1) The illustrative fees model used to estimate the present value of the management agreement is available on Infratil’s website.
PORTFOLIO RETURNS AS AT 31 MARCH 2026
AssetSegmentGeography
Month of Initial
Investment
Duration
(years)
Total capital
invested
1
(NZD)
Total realised
proceeds
2
(NZD)
Total unrealised
proceeds
3
(NZD)
Total value
4
(NZD)
IRR
(NZD)
CDCDigital InfrastructureAustralasia
September 20169.6 1,588 169 8,933 9,102 35.8%
One NZDigital InfrastructureNew Zealand
July 20196.7 2,852 1,386 3,387 4,773 16.5%
Kao DataDigital InfrastructureUnited Kingdom
August 20214.6 574 - 865 865 15.4%
FortysouthDigital InfrastructureNew Zealand
October 20223.4 212 9 217 226 1.8%
Clearvision VenturesDigital InfrastructureUnited States
March 201610.1 105 2 192 193 13.0%
Longroad EnergyRenewable EnergyUnited States
October 20169.4 830 308 2,389 2,698 47.3%
Manawa Energy
5
Renewable EnergyNew Zealand
April 199431.3 395 2,607 - 2,607 18.0%
Contact Energy
7
Renewable EnergyNew Zealand
July 20250.7 1,356 44 1,395 1,439 7.5%
Gurīn EnergyRenewable EnergyAsia
July 20214.7 265 1 553 554 44.4%
GalileoRenewable EnergyEurope
February 20206.1 205 - 257 257 9.9%
Mint RenewablesRenewable EnergyAustralia
December 20223.3 36 - 45 45 14.4%
RHCNZ Medical Imaging
6
HealthcareNew Zealand
May 20214.8 576 149 616 765 8.6%
Qscan Group
6
HealthcareAustralia
December 20205.3 385 103 590 693 14.1%
Anytime RadiologyHealthcareAustralasia
December 20250.3 119 6 114 120 N/M
RetireAustraliaHealthcareAustralia
December 201411.0 370 373 - 373 0.1%
Wellington AirportAirportsNew Zealand
November 199827.4 96 696 1,071 1,767 17.4%
Infratil PropertyOtherNew Zealand
December 200718.0 91 162 - 162 8.4%
Notes:
1.Total capital invested is equal to the sum of all capital invested by Infratil into the asset during the holding period, and consists of initial capital contributions, shareholder loan contributions, capital calls, and acquisition of management
shares vesting under LTI schemes
2.Total realised proceeds is equal to the sum of all distributions received by Infratil during the holding period and consists of capital returns, shareholder loan interest payments, shareholder loan principal payments, dividends, and
subvention payments.
3.Total unrealised proceeds is equal to the valuation of Infratil’s stake in each of its assets. These valuations are aligned to Infratil asset values as summarised on page 35
4.Total value is equal to total realised proceeds plus total unrealised proceeds
5.A non-cash benefit equal to the value of Infratil’s share of Tilt on split from Trustpower has been recognised in Total realised proceeds for Manawa to capture the value of the embedded option within Manawa
6.A non-cash benefit equal to the value of Infratil's capital contributions into Qscan and RHCNZ which reflected the purchase of Teleradiology assets by Anytime Radiology has been recognised
7.As Contact Energy has been held for less than a year its IRR has been de-annualised to reflect the shorter holding period
34
INCENTIVE FEES
•The incentive fee is calculated based on 20% of the outperformance of an international asset’s valuation above a 12% hurdle
•As at 31 March 2026, a realised incentive fee of negative $21.2 million and an annual incentive fee of negative $18.2 million have been calculated
•The realised negative fee has been offset against the current incentive fee bank and will reduce the fee payable as at 31 March 2026
•The $18.2 million negative annual fee will be carried forward to the next fiscal year and be used to reduce any positive fees earned
31 March ($millions)FY25 Valuation
2
CapitalFXDistributionsHurdleFY26 Valuation
1
OutperformanceIncentive Fee
Annual Incentive Fee
CDC(7,212.2) (555.7)- 6.9 (894.6)8,888.5 232.9 46.6
Kao Data(694.5) (98.3)(10.7)- (88.0)856.7 (34.8)(7.0)
Longroad Energy(1,728.2) (48.7)(1.9)- (212.1)1,886.9 (104.0)(20.8)
Galileo(321.1) (53.4)(0.4)- (42.0)253.2 (163.7)(32.7)
Gurin Energy(485.6) (92.8)(4.1)- (65.2)545.0 (102.7)(20.5)
Mint Renewables(22.6) (14.5)- - (3.6)44.3 3.6 0.7
Qscan(450.0) - - - (54.0)581.8 77.8 15.6
Annual Total(10,914.3) (863.5)(17.0)6.9 (1,359.5)13,056.5 (90.9)(18.2)
Realised Incentive Fee
RetireAustralia(404.2) - - - (35.0)333.0 (106.2)(21.2)
(11,318.6) (863.5)(17.0)6.9 (1,394.5)13,389.5 (197.1)(39.4)
Notes: (1) Valuations for the purposes of the incentive fee are calculated net of estimated costs of disposal and any potential capital gains
taxes; (2) Signs are negative to enable calculation across to determine outperformance.
35
Year ended 31 March ($Millions) Share20252026
CDC49.7% $173.9 $220.4
One NZ99.8% $604.0 $607.4
Kao Data54.7% $4.9 $5.8
Longroad Energy42.0% $27.3 $77.5
RHCNZ Medical Imaging 56.8% $63.2 $63.6
Qscan Group59.5% $48.7 $50.9
Wellington Airport66.0% $86.1 $88.1
Operational EBITDAF$1,008.1$1,113.7
Galileo38.0% ($26.7)($24.6)
Gurīn Energy95.0% ($32.0)($30.6)
Mint Renewables73.0% ($9.9)($14.9)
Development Spend($68.6)($70.1)
Corporate costs100%($112.8)($124.3)
Proportionate EBITDAF (continuing)$826.7 $919.3
Fortysouth20.0% $13.6 $15.6
Manawa Energy51.1% $46.6 $12.5
RetireAustralia50.0% $21.6 $20.1
Infratil Property100.0% $9.3 $6.5
Total Proportionate EBITDAF$917.8 $974.0
•Proportionate Operational EBITDAF presented earlier is on the FY26 guidance basis and includes
corporate costs. From FY27, guidance will be provided excluding corporate costs, which will be provided
separately. Proportionate Operational EBITDAF is Infratil’s share of the EBITDAF of the companies it has
invested in and is before interest, tax, depreciation, amortisation, financial derivative movements,
impairments, revaluations, and gains or losses on the sales of investments
•Proportionate capital expenditure shows Infratil’s share of the investment spending of investee companies.
PROPORTIONATE EBITDAF AND CAPITAL EXPENDITURE
Year ended 31 March ($Millions)20252026
CDC$928.2 $1,181.9
One NZ$269.3 $245.2
Kao Data$82.8 $251.7
Longroad Energy$805.6 $777.7
Gurīn Energy$39.5 $68.2
Galileo$52.6 $42.7
Mint Renewables$0.5 $0.3
RHCNZ Medical Imaging$25.3 $26.6
Qscan Group$13.1 $18.6
Wellington Airport$77.5 $73.7
Capital expenditure (continuing)$2,294.4$2,686.6
Fortysouth$4.8$9.1
Manawa Energy$26.5$5.0
RetireAustralia$62.8 $49.4
Proportionate capital expenditure$2,388.5$2,750.1
Proportionate EBITDAFProportionate Capital Expenditure
36
Year ended 31 March ($Millions)20252026
CDC$494.2 $555.7
One NZ$20.9 $0.6
Kao Data$82.9 $98.3
Longroad Energy$163.4 $48.7
Gurīn Energy$67.5 $92.8
Galileo$41.9 $53.4
Contact Energy-$293.9
Mint Renewables$11.7 $14.5
RHCNZ Medical Imaging$48.1 $49.1
Anytime Radiology-$119.5
Clearvision$8.0 $9.3
Infratil Investments$938.6 $1,335.8
Commentary
•Direct investment reflects capital deployed by Infratil to acquire new
investments, increase holdings in existing assets, or fund capital
contributions to investee companies.
•CDC investment reflects settlement of the acquisition of an additional
1.58% of ordinary shares in May 2025, alongside Infratil’s participation
in CDC’s A$500 million capital raise in February 2026.
•Kao Data investment primarily supports continued development of the
Harlow data centre campus and acquisition of a new West London
greenfield site for development.
•Contact Energy investment reflects a 50% cash payment to acquire
TECT Holdings’ 4.92% stake in October 2025 (the remaining 50% was
funded through the issuance of Infratil shares), alongside participation
in Contact’s February equity raise.
•Anytime Radiology investment relates to the carve-out of the
teleradiology businesses from Qscan and RHCNZ Medical Imaging.
•Longroad Energy equity injections have supported new projects as they
reach financial close and commence construction.
•Gurīn Energy, Galileo, and Mint Renewables investments support
platform growth and development of their respective pipelines.
INFRATIL DIRECT INVESTMENT
37
Commentary
•This table reflects the cash flow of the Infratil wholly-owned group
and reconciles opening and closing cash balances.
•A breakdown of distributions received and capital invested by asset
is provided in the Detailed Financial Information and Operating
Metrics tables released alongside this presentation.
•International Portfolio Incentive fees paid during the period include
Tranche 1 of the FY25 annual incentive fee of $116.9 million, Tranche
2 of the FY24 annual incentive fee of $30.4 million, and Tranche 3 of
the FY23 annual incentive fee of $54.6 million, of which $80.0 million
was paid in scrip to Infratil’s Manager.
INFRATIL CORPORATE CASH FLOW
Year ended 31 March ($Millions)20252026
Distributions received from portfolio companies$258.0$336.8
Management fees($109.3)($122.8)
Net interest($115.1)($144.5)
Other corporate operating cash flows($29.7)($16.3)
Net cash inflow/(outflow) from operating activities$3.9$53.2
Infratil direct investment($938.6)($1,335.8)
Proceeds from portfolio divestments-$567.1
Other investment costs($16.3)($7.8)
Incentive fees paid($106.8)($122.0)
Net cash inflow/(outflow) from investing activities($1,061.7)($895.5)
Dividends paid($124.1)($140.7)
Net bond issuance$170.0($41.1)
Debt drawdown/(repayment)($194.4)$1,010.4
Equity raised$1,258.8-
Net cash inflow/(outflow) from financing cashflows$1,110.3$828.6
Net increase/(decrease) in cash$52.5($16.7)
Cash and equivalents at the beginning of the year$19.2$71.9
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents$52.5($16.7)
FX gains/(losses) on cash and cash equivalents$0.2($19.0)
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year$71.9$36.2
38
EARNINGS RECONCILIATION
Year ended 31 March ($Millions)
20252026
Net profit after tax (‘NPAT’)
($269.8)$574.3
Less: Associates equity accounted earnings
($493.7)($442.2)
Plus: Associates proportionate EBITDAF
$179.4$279.1
Less: Minority share of subsidiary EBITDAF
($138.2)($131.8)
Less: Income received fair value assets through OCI
-($45.7)
Plus: Acquisition/sale-related transaction costs
$7.6$12.8
Plus: One-off restructuring costs
$7.6$3.5
Net loss/(gain) on foreign exchange and derivatives
$39.4($16.9)
Net realisations, revaluations and impairments
$107.3$99.3
Discontinued operations
($0.2)($280.2)
Underlying earnings
($560.6)$52.2
Plus: Depreciation & amortisation
$602.0$580.4
Plus: Net interest
$401.4$453.3
Plus: Tax
$46.3($138.9)
Plus: International Portfolio Incentive fee
$346.9($21.2)
Proportionate EBITDAF
$836.0$925.8
less: Discontinued operations($9.3)($6.5)
Proportionate EBITDAF (continuing operations)
$826.7$919.3
Commentary
•Proportionate EBITDAF is an unaudited non-GAAP (‘Generally
Accepted Accounting Principles’) measure of financial performance,
presented to provide additional insight into management’s view of
the underlying business performance.
•Proportionate EBITDAF is shown from continuing operations and
includes corporate and management costs, however, excludes
incentive fees, transaction costs and contributions from businesses
sold, or held for sale.
•Specifically, in the context of operating businesses, Proportionate
EBITDAF provides a metric that can be used to report on the
operations of the business (as distinct from investing and other
valuation movements).
39
Commentary
•Loan to value (LTV) calculation = adjusted net debt / fair value of
portfolio
•LTV approach consistent with S&P approach to assessing Infratil’s
stressed leverage under the Alternative Investment Funds methodology
•Fair value of portfolio represent Infratil’s proportionate share of an
asset's independent valuation, market value, or book value
•Net debt is corporate net debt (financial debt obligations of Infratil
Limited and Infratil Finance Limited) adjusted for:
–Infratil’s proportionate share of Letter of Credits issued by portfolio
companies with recourse to shareholders
–Unconditional Fortysouth divestment proceeds receivable at 31
March 2026
•Liquidity available includes:
–undrawn corporate bank facilities
–corporate cash
–unconditional Fortysouth divestment proceeds
•Weighted average cost of drawn debt of 5.20% and a weighted average
tenor of debt of 2.7 years
Notes: (1) Drawn debt excluding Perpetual IFTHAs, including drawn Acquisition Facilities.
31 March ($Millions)20252026
Net bank debt$544.8$1,602.6
Infrastructure bonds$1,411.1$1,370.0
Perpetual bonds$231.9$231.9
Total net debt drawn$2,187.8$3,204.5
Adjustments:
Recourse Letters of Credit issued$150.9$161.0
Fortysouth proceeds-($217.0)
Adjusted net debt$2,338.7$3,148.5
Fair value of portfolio$18,303.7$20,407.0
Loan to value12.8%15.4%
Liquidity available (adjusted)$1,437.5 $1,108.5
40
DEBT & LIQUIDITY
31 March 2026Gearing
1
Net Debt / EBITDA
2
% of drawn debt
hedged
3
CDC
4
24.2%9.493%
One NZ30.6%2.974%
Kao Data26.8%n/a99%
Longroad Energy
5
14.3%n/a92%
Galileo
6
n/a n/a n/a
Gurīn Energy
7
n/a n/a n/a
Mint Renewables
8
n/a n/a n/a
RHCNZ Medical Imaging28.1%4.172%
Qscan Group23.2%3.163%
Anytime Radiology8.8%n/an/a
Wellington Airport33.7%6.079%
Value Weighted Average of
Portfolio Companies
9
24.2%85%
Notes:
1.Gearing calculated as total net debt / total capital based on most recent independent valuations, listed equity value or book value at 31 March 2026
2.Unless otherwise stated EBITDA definitions based on pre IFRS16 and allowable pro forma adjustments under financing arrangements for each Portfolio Company rounded to one decimal place
3.Calculated as floating rate drawn debt plus active ‘pay fixed’ interest rate swaps / total drawn debt as at 31 March 2026
4.CDC leverage metric applies March 2026 run rate EBITDA annualised, consistent with Moody’s calculation
5.Longroad gearing calculation reflects holding company Net Debt position and excludes non-recourse project financing, % of drawn debt hedged is based on non-recourse term debt but excludes construction and working capital facilities
6. 7. 8. Holding company Net Debt position, excludes non-recourse project finance borrowing
9. Calculated based on IFT’s value weighted, proportionate share of Total Net Debt /Total Capital and % of drawn debt hedged across all portfolio companies excluding Fortysouth
Commentary
•Gearing and credit metrics are monitored both at a portfolio level
and within individual portfolio companies.
•In addition to these metrics, CDC’s Australian business was assigned
a Baa2 (Stable) investment grade rating by Moody’s on 21 April 2026,
reflecting its strong financial position and disciplined growth
strategy. Wellington Airport maintains a BBB credit rating from S&P
with a stable outlook.
•EBITDAF-based leverage metrics are not considered appropriate for
Longroad Energy and Kao Data, given their industry segments and
current operating models.
•Interest rate exposure is monitored at each portfolio company and
managed within approved treasury policy limits.
•Hedging: 85% of drawn debt was hedged on a fixed-rate basis as at
31 March 2026 (89% at 31 March 2025).
PORTFOLIO COMPANY DEBT
41
---
ANNUAL
REPORT
2026
INVESTING
WISELY IN IDEAS
THAT MATTER
Contents
Financial overview 1
Report of the Chair 2
Report of the Chief Executive 5
Management model 11
Sustainability 14
Portfolio 16
Financial performance 33
Corporate governance 97
Directory 114
At Longroad Energy’s solar farms, sustainability extends beyond clean
power generation. A wildlife and habitat assessment is conducted for
each renewable energy project to formulate strategies to reduce wildlife
risk and identify measures to enhance ecological services.
This approach reflects Infratil’s purpose of investing wisely in ideas that
matter, where progress is measured not only by short term outputs, but
also by the enduring value created for communities and the natural
world alike.
In Arizona, Longroad Energy voluntarily funded research supporting the
relocation of Western Burrowing Owls into desert areas near solar farms.
This involved partnering with a conservation group, Wild at Heart, to
create artificial burrows where adult owls are now raising young owls
due to this innovative approach.
The initiative achieves a thoughtful balance between energy generation
infrastructure and ecological benefits for a declining wildlife species in
the desert. It is a considered intervention, grounded in long-term
thinking and respect for place.
Further afield, Longroad Energy supports research into agrivoltaics
(solar agriculture integration) and participates in collaborative studies
through the Renewable Energy Wildlife Institute, to advance research
into “managed ecosystems” and enhance wildlife at energy sites.
Disclaimer
This Annual Report has been prepared by Infratil Limited (NZ company number 597366, NZX:IFT; ASX:IFT). To the maximum extent permitted by law, Infratil Limited, its affiliates
and each of their respective affiliates, related bodies corporate, directors, officers, partners, employees and agents will not be liable (whether in tort (including negligence) or
otherwise) to you or any other person in relation to this Annual Report. It contains summary information about Infratil Limited and its activities which is current as at the date of
this report.
This report should be read in conjunction with Infratil Limited’s FY26 Results Investor Presentation, market releases and other periodic and continuous disclosure
announcements, which are available at www.nzx.com, www.asx.com.au or infratil.com/for-investors/. This report is for information purposes only and is not financial, legal, tax,
investment or other advice or a recommendation to acquire Infratil Limited securities and has been prepared without taking into account the objectives, financial situation or
needs of prospective investors. This report may contain certain “forward-looking statements” about Infratil Limited and the environment in which it operates, such as indications
of, and guidance on, future earnings, financial position and performance. Forward-looking information is inherently uncertain and subject to contingencies outside of Infratil
Limited’s control, and it gives no representation, warranty or assurance that actual outcomes or performance will not materially differ from the forward-looking statements.
ContentsInfratil Annual Report
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
Financial OverviewInfratil Annual Report
FY26 OVERVIEW
A STRONG TRACK RECORD: 18% TSR SINCE INCEPTION IN 1994
02004006008001,200 1,000
NZ$m
FY22
FY25
FY24
FY23
FY26
5001,0001,5002,0002,5003,0000
NZ$m
5,00010,00015,00020,00025,0000
NZ$m
FY22
FY25
FY24
FY23
FY26
FY22
FY25
FY24
FY23
FY26
17.5018.0018.5019.0019.5020.0020.5021.0021.5017.00
CPS
FY22
FY25
FY24
FY23
FY26
PROPORTIONATE OPERATIONAL EBITDAF
1
02004006008001,200 1,000
NZ$m
FY22
FY25
FY24
FY23
FY26
5001,0001,5002,0002,5003,0000
NZ$m
5,00010,00015,00020,00025,0000
NZ$m
FY22
FY25
FY24
FY23
FY26
FY22
FY25
FY24
FY23
FY26
17.5018.0018.5019.0019.5020.0020.5021.0021.5017.00
CPS
FY22
FY25
FY24
FY23
FY26
PROPORTIONATE CAPITAL EXPENDITURE
2
02004006008001,200 1,000
NZ$m
FY22
FY25
FY24
FY23
FY26
5001,0001,5002,0002,5003,0000
NZ$m
5,00010,00015,00020,00025,0000
NZ$m
FY22
FY25
FY24
FY23
FY26
FY22
FY25
FY24
FY23
FY26
17.5018.0018.5019.0019.5020.0020.5021.0021.5017.00
CPS
FY22
FY25
FY24
FY23
FY26
TOTAL ASSET VALUE
02004006008001,200 1,000
NZ$m
FY22
FY25
FY24
FY23
FY26
5001,0001,5002,0002,5003,0000
NZ$m
5,00010,00015,00020,00025,0000
NZ$m
FY22
FY25
FY24
FY23
FY26
FY22
FY25
FY24
FY23
FY26
17.50
18.0018.5019.0019.5020.0020.5021.0021.5017.00
CPS
FY22
FY25
FY24
FY23
FY26
DIVIDEND
$989 M
Proportionate Operational EBITDAF
1
11%
$2.7 B
Proportionate Capital Expenditure
2
17%
$20.6 B
Total Asset Value
13%
$16.26 per share
Net Asset Value (post fees)
5%
20.9 cents per share
Dividend Declared
2%
94/100
GRESB
3
Sustainability Score
9%
1
1. EBITDAF is an unaudited non-GAAP measure of consolidated net earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, amortisation, financial derivative movements, impairments, revaluations, and gains or losses on the sale of investments. EBITDAF also excludes acquisition
and sale-related transaction costs, management incentive fees, and one-off project costs. EBITDAF does not have a standardised meaning and should not be viewed in isolation, nor considered a substitute for measures reported in accordance with NZ IFRS, as it
may not be comparable to similar financial information presented by other entities. Proportionate Operational EBITDAF represents Infratil’s share of EBITDAF from its investee companies, excluding Contact Energy. It also excludes corporate costs and early-stage,
non-capitalised Development Spend incurred by Infratil’s early-stage renewables businesses. A reconciliation of net profit after tax to Proportionate EBITDAF is provided in the FY26 Annual Results Presentation.
2. Proportionate Capital Expenditure is Infratil’s share of the capital expenditure of all portfolio companies held during the year, excluding listed company Contact Energy.
3. The Global Real Estate Sustainability Benchmark (GRESB).
REPORT OF THE
BOARD CHAIR
United States 13%Europe 5%Asia 3%Australia 47%New Zealand 32%
49.7%
Infratil Share
99.8%
54.7%
42.0%
56.8%
14.1%
95.0%
38.0%
73.0%
On behalf of your Board, I’m pleased to
report a total shareholder return of 13.9%
and proportionate operational EBITDAF
growth of 11% for FY26.
Kia ora koutou,
Infratil began in New Zealand 31 years ago and our cornerstone goal is
to deliver shareholders 11 to 15% returns, after fees and taxes, over a
10-year period. Our performance against this measure is 17.3% from
FY17 to FY26.
For FY26, from 1 April 2025 to 31 March 2026, we delivered a return of
13.9% based on share price growth and assuming dividends were
reinvested. While our share price performance during FY26 was positive,
it continued to be affected by global market noise. This included market
concerns about financial returns on AI investment and the Middle East
conflict. Even so, our conviction in our growth opportunities is stronger
than ever.
Longroad Energy emerged from the regulatory uncertainty
overshadowing United States renewable investment a year ago, with a
positive outcome on tax incentives and a market backdrop of growing
electricity demand. Similarly, CDC is expanding its data centre footprint
in Australasia as fast as it can to meet the unprecedented demand for
computing capacity. Its 5 May 2026 announcement of a massive
555 megawatts (MW) contract propelled Infratil’s share price to an
all-time high above $15.
Infratil is more than a single asset and the geographic and multi-sector
diversity of our portfolio again provided added strength. We grew
proportionate operational EBITDAF across the portfolio by 11% to
NZ$989 million in FY26, despite our New Zealand businesses
continuing to be constrained by weakness in the domestic economy.
This year-on-year EBITDAF growth was very positive given we also sold
some businesses during the year.
Infratil’s ongoing growth enabled us to confirm a dividend payout of
20.9 cents per share, unimputed. This was up from 20.5 cents per share
in FY25.
1
23
1
2
5
3
2
1
1
4
3
4
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
5
1
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
Report of the ChairInfratil Annual Report
Total shareholder return (TSR) is the
overall gain from an investment over
time, including share price increases and
dividends. It assumes any dividends are
reinvested.
PeriodInfratil TSR
1 year13.9%
5 years13.1%
10 years17.3%
Since inception17.9%
Returns calculated to 31 March 2026
Share priceNZ$
31 March 202510.38
31 March 202611.65
Cumulative Annual Return (%)
FY16FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
-100%
0%
100%
200%
300%
400%
500%
600%
Infratil TSR NZX 50ASX 200
TOTAL SHAREHOLDER RETURN – 10 YEARS
66.0%
59.4%
3
1
59.5%
2
Anytime Radiology
2
MARKET PERSPECTIVES ON VALUE
Infratil’s returns compare favourably against our target 11-15% range,
as well as the NZX 50 and ASX 200, over multiple timeframes as shown
to the left.
Another measure that we follow closely is our calculated net asset
value (NAV) per share, after fees, which grew from $15.48 to $16.26
over the year. The NAV represents the estimated value of our underlying
investment portfolio, plus cash and other assets, less net debt and other
liabilities. It is typically calculated using independent or market based
valuation methods for our portfolio companies.
We recognise that market views on value can differ for reasons such as
interest rate movements, market sentiment and different perspectives
on asset valuations. This means, for example, that the share price can
lag our NAV per share where Infratil’s valuations incorporate growth that
is longer dated than equity markets are willing to value.
Infratil’s share price discount to NAV widened to about 25% across
FY25 and FY26. Market sentiment was a significant driver of this
discount. At the end of FY25, we experienced the noise of potential
changes to American renewable energy policy and uncertainty about
data centre demand following the release of the Deep Seek AI model.
Positive outcomes through the first half of FY26 were then eroded when
AI bubble concerns resurfaced and the Middle East conflict drove
broader uncertainty.
Pleasingly, CDC’s massive contract announcement in May 2026 has
seen the share price discount to NAV reduce to about 10% at recent
$15 levels.
We’ll keep working to reduce this market discount to our NAV by helping
our portfolio companies to realise their growth opportunities and by
communicating our insights on future value to the market. If there is a
material sustained discount to NAV, the Board does also have the option
of implementing share buybacks of up to 20 million shares annually. This
would need to be weighed up against growth opportunities requiring
capital in the near term.
A SHARPENED STRATEGIC FOCUS
Infratil’s strength is our ability to evolve, spot thematic opportunities, and
to act decisively with exceptional management teams. It is what sets us
apart and has enabled our long-term success. As part of our continued
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
Report of the ChairInfratil Annual Report
Balance Infratil’s cash flow and dividends
Identify and scale our growth platforms
beyond CDC and Longroad Energy
Continue to broaden our shareholder base
and support future scale
Divest businesses unlikely to scale under
our ownership and reinvest
INFRATIL TSR COMPARISON
INFRATIL NET ASSET VALUE (NAV) PER SHARE
16
14
12
20
18
10
8
6
4
2
0
NZ$
31 Mar 2430 Sep 2431 Mar 2530 Sep 2531 Mar 26
Infratil NAV per shareInfratil share price
18%
16%
14%
12%
10%
8%
6%
4%
2%
1 year
Infratil
5 years10 years20 years
NZX 50
Our target is an 11-15% return over 10 years
ASX 200
0%
evolution, and increasing size, we sharpened the clarity provided to
investors about our strategic priorities. This entailed setting four
medium-term objectives for investors to track. Jason Boyes, Infratil’s
CEO, provides more detail on the progress made against these
measures in his following report.
We articulated these strategic priorities for several reasons. First,
Infratil’s growing scale and maturity brings new challenges and
opportunities. This increases the need for discipline in how we allocate
shareholder capital. The market volatility through FY26 has been a good
reminder of the need to be agile and to continually look ahead.
As we’ve said before, the best strategy in the face of uncertainty is to
back quality. That quality comes from high-performing assets, strong
management, and sectors underpinned by enduring demand.
Portfolio strategy has been a key area of focus for the Board as we look
ahead to the type and scale of assets needed to drive continuing
out-performance and growth. We’re concentrating our efforts on
thematics with the greatest potential to create long-term value.
That has meant a shift to refining our portfolio, improving operating
performance, and ensuring that every investment supports our
strategic direction.
1. Infratil’s Net Asset Value (NAV) is the total value of its investments, based on
independent valuations, book values or market prices, less Infratil’s total net
debt and an estimate of management and incentive fees. Fees are calculated
assuming that Infratil’s share price grows at the bottom end of its target return
range of 11–15%, and that incentive fees on international assets reflect the
mid-point rate of growth. These fees are discounted over a five-year period.
3
Second, we believe transparency of what we’re focused on helps build
confidence in our long-term strategy. In addition to publishing our
strategic priorities, we’ve implemented various initiatives to improve
our disclosure and help investors better understand our business.
These have included:
• continued evolution of our reporting materials with an emphasis
on clarity and simplicity
• developing renewables valuation modelling to assist understanding
of Longroad Energy’s business
• publication of a simple fees model to explain the key components
of the Morrison fees.
We’re also formalising key elements of our investment approach — the
Infratil Way — that are critical to sustaining future performance as we
scale. This includes codifying our approach and processes for portfolio
company board performance assessments, remuneration reviews and
sustainability practices.
Work is underway to embed these principles and unlock synergies
through greater collaboration between portfolio companies – where
it makes sense to do so. Newer businesses can benefit from the
experience of more mature ones, and that’s vital as we grow.
OUR RELATIONSHIP WITH MORRISON
The day-to-day management of Infratil is delegated by your Board
to Morrison. This means the people working for Infratil are Morrison
employees, but we retain oversight and make key decisions on the
strategic direction of the business.
Our relationship with Morrison enables Infratil to draw on the global
expertise that Morrison is growing across multiple infrastructure
sectors. That growth supports Infratil and Morrison’s wider clients and
investment funds. This global exposure is becoming increasingly
important for Infratil as we seek larger and new sector investment
opportunities.
As Morrison’s largest client, we are well positioned. Infratil management
sees all ideas being germinated at Morrison and the Infratil Board sees
relevant opportunities. This means we aren’t limited for choice. The
challenge is more about balancing opportunities with our current
priorities and the returns we are seeking.
One of the Board’s key roles is to monitor the performance of Morrison.
The Board has been working to ensure there is an evolving mix of
qualitative and quantitative measures that align with Infratil’s growth
and drive strong performance from Morrison. We believe shareholders
do get good value under our agreements with Morrison and there is a
healthy tension in our relationship. This tension is reflected in our review
of costs allocated to Infratil in recent years and the evolution of our
management agreement.
While Morrison is paid management fees annually, incentive fees can
only be earned on non-New Zealand assets for out-performance above
a 12% hurdle for asset valuation growth. If incentive fees are earned, as
they were in FY25, they are paid over three years and there is a clawback
mechanism if the asset valuations reduce below the initial qualifying
amount. During the year, the Board chose to pay $80 million of
Morrison’s existing incentive fees in Infratil shares. This was considered
better value for shareholders than a cash payment and increases
Morrison’s alignment with Infratil’s shareholders in an ownership sense.
In FY26, the incentive fee hurdle wasn’t achieved and Morrison didn’t
qualify for a new incentive fee. Instead, a negative $18 million amount
will be carried forward into the FY27 fee calculation and netted off future
positive fees.
1
This shows the model is working.
BOARD EVOLUTION
I’m proud to chair a high-functioning and well-balanced Infratil Board.
We have strong capabilities and skills around the board table, and we
constantly challenge ourselves to ensure we’re making the best
decisions on behalf of shareholders.
Board succession is a focus as several of us are approaching generally
accepted time limits for service. Our goal through director succession is
to ensure that we replace the core skills of retiring directors and maintain
a strong, diverse, board culture.
Peter Springford has confirmed that he will retire from the Board at
the end of his current term at the Annual Meeting in August. We’re in
the process of recruiting a director to join before he retires. For my
part, having reached 12 years of tenure, I have said that I expect to
retire from the Board at the Annual Meeting in 2028. We’ll ensure a
smooth transition and will update investors in due course.
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
Report of the ChairInfratil Annual Report
LOOKING AHEAD
Infratil’s strength, as always, lies in our commitment to active
management, strategic clarity, and long-term value creation. S&P
Global Ratings recognised the strength, quality and resilience of our
business and track record with an inaugural BBB+ credit rating.
I believe we are well positioned with the current vintage of Infratil assets
the strongest yet. We have enviable exposure to very strong demand
drivers across the renewable and digital sectors, and this year’s results
show CDC and Longroad Energy beginning to deliver meaningful
returns.
These may be uncertain times, but they are also exciting times for
ideas that matter.
Thank you for your continued support.
Nga mihi nui,
Alison Gerry
Chair
1. See page 35 of Infratil’s FY26 Annual Results Presentation for more detail.
4
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
Report of the Chief ExecutiveInfratil Annual Report
REPORT OF THE
CHIEF EXECUTIVE
Dear Investors,
How quickly things change. When initially thinking about the themes
for this letter in April, FY26 hadn’t exactly been the steadier year we’d
hoped for. After navigating the market noise of the prior year, we
made good progress in the first half with strong updates from Longroad
Energy and CDC. However, we then saw negative AI sentiment, along
with expectations of longer dated growth and rising rates, drive the
share price lower. With a large weighting of our portfolio in data
centres, market views on AI have become a meaningful driver of
Infratil’s share price.
Sentiment shifted our way again late in the last quarter as the Middle
East conflict encouraged investors to seek defensive stocks and global
hyperscalers announced capital expenditure plans totalling about
US$650 billion of AI-related investment. In February, we also
experienced the ‘SaaS-pocalypse’, as investors worried about AI’s
effect on tech businesses.
Given this volatile market backdrop, we’re very pleased to have
delivered a 13.9% total shareholder return for the year.
CDC MOVES THE GROWTH NEEDLE, MASSIVELY
Just five weeks on from year-end and the ups and downs of FY26 have
been swept aside by CDC’s announcement of Australasia’s largest ever
data centre contract. At our institutional investor event in Sydney in
September 2025, CDC’s founder and CEO Greg Boorer had talked
about an impending tsunami of demand. Massive, mega, super-sized,
and monster, were some of the superlatives used by media and analysts
to describe the 555MW deal.
The market responded positively to the announcement and Infratil’s
share price lifted to over $15 for the first time ever, equating to an
approximately 30% gain in this brief period. This demonstrates the point
in Chair Alison Gerry’s letter that equity markets can take time to
recognise longer dated growth. In March, our independent valuation for
CDC included forecasts for expected demand. There should be some
further uplift in the next valuation for the crystallisation of that demand
into an actual contract and the acceleration of the future demand it
represents.
With CDC making up about 40% of our portfolio, this kind of market
reaction has an amplified effect. That can go both ways, and we do
get asked when we will sell CDC given the potential concentration risk.
As I said last year, we’re comfortable with its position today.
Half of CDC’s valuation is relatively low risk, comprising lengthy leases
to some of the world’s most creditworthy companies. The rest is growth,
and we monitor the growth prospects of data centres around the world.
While there is a lot of AI hype that needs to be screened out, it is clear
we are in the midst, arguably still near the beginning, of one of the
largest technological developments and infrastructure build outs we’re
likely to see in our lifetimes.
We’re lucky enough to have a front row seat and the recent contract
announcement puts us well ahead of the investment case that
underpinned our decision in early 2025 to lift our CDC shareholding to
49.7%. For a long time, we’ve wondered if CDC should expand offshore
to capture some of the oversized growth we see there, from arguably
less capable businesses. Instead, we’re now seeing oversized overseas
demand coming to Australasia, where we are strongest and feel well
positioned to continue to win.
66%
23%
6%
5%
$8,933m
$3,387m
$865m
$192m
$1,395m
$2,389m
$590m
$616m
$114m
$1,071m
$257m
$553m
$45m
Anytime
Radiology
TOTAL ASSET VALUE NZ$20.6 BILLION AT 31 MARCH 2026
1
1. Based on a combination of independent valuation, market and book values. Chart excludes Fortysouth following its subsequent sale.
Healthcare Infrastructure
Airport
Digital Infrastructure
Renewable Energy
5
MORE THAN JUST A DATA CENTRE BUSINESS
We don’t see Infratil becoming all data centres. Just over half our net
asset value comes from businesses spanning renewable energy, telco
networks, medical imaging and an airport. Happily, the growth of data
centres and their need for electricity is providing a tailwind for some of
our renewable energy development businesses, along with
longstanding decarbonisation drivers. The Middle East conflict has also
helped turn sentiment back towards renewable energy.
We’re very positive about Longroad Energy’s outlook in the United
States. While regulatory changes drove negative sentiment about the
prospects for renewable energy in the United States at the start of FY26,
all the previous regulatory support mechanisms for solar investment
remain in place until 2030, and even longer for batteries. This has been
positive for well capitalised operators, like Longroad Energy, that have
been very effective in qualifying their projects early. At the same time,
strong power demand and prices have offset higher delivery costs. This
has maintained their attractive development returns.
Renewables development outside the United States has been more
difficult. Power demand and prices haven’t risen as much to offset
higher project delivery and platform costs, as the complexity and time
of developments has increased in many of the markets we’re active in.
This has seen returns compress.
Consequently, in Europe we’ve seen the value attributed to earlier stage
projects fall dramatically. This is largely why Galileo’s valuation has
reduced in FY26, along with some longer dated projects being written
down or off. Although the amounts are relatively small for Infratil, this is
obviously not what we hoped for our investment. We’re working closely
with Galileo to reset the business for future growth. It will now focus on
fewer nearer term projects in a smaller number of markets.
Gurīn Energy is active in a number of Asian markets with significant
renewable energy development potential. Some of these markets
have also seen development returns reduce and Gurīn is managing
its prioritisation of markets and opportunities carefully. Last year, for
example, I said we were particularly focused on Gurīn’s large-scale,
Singapore-focused solar and battery energy storage project based in
Indonesia. It is one of a small number of Indonesian projects that the
Singapore Government has supported by issuing a conditional import
licence.
PROPORTIONATE CAPEX
PROPORTIONATE EBITDAF
1
ASSET VALUE
Contact EnergyKao DataCDC
One NZ
Wellington Airport
HealthcareSold
Corporate
Other renewables
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
Report of the Chief ExecutiveInfratil Annual Report
It still requires Indonesian Government approval and while Government-
to-Government discussions appear to be progressing, they are taking
longer than we’d hoped. We’re confident the project can play a key role
in supporting Singapore’s energy needs and create significant benefits
for Indonesia. However, some of our investment to date could be lost if
approvals aren’t received.
This is the nature of the renewable energy development business. It has
always been exposed to regulatory changes and market dynamics. We
have platforms and projects in multiple jurisdictions, to take advantage
of where regulatory and economic settings are positive. Or, to minimise
our downside where they are not.
As the charts above show, Longroad Energy has invested heavily in
recent years as it builds out its generating capacity. Investment in the
development pipeline for our other renewables businesses has been
much smaller. Longroad Energy’s investment is beginning to deliver a
meaningful uplift in EBITDAF, while our other renewables businesses
are still at an early development stage and are yet to deliver positive
earnings growth.
6
Longroad Energy
FY24
FY25
FY26
050010001500200025003000
NZ$m
0500010000150002000025000
FY24
NZ$m
FY25
FY26
FY24
NZ$m
FY25
FY26
-200020040060080010001200
FY24
FY25
FY26
050010001500200025003000
NZ$m
0500010000150002000025000
FY24
NZ$m
FY25
FY26
FY24
NZ$m
FY25
FY26
-200020040060080010001200
FY24
FY25
FY26
050010001500200025003000
NZ$m
0500010000150002000025000
FY24
NZ$m
FY25
FY26
FY24
NZ$m
FY25
FY26
-200020040060080010001200
1. The calculation of proportionate EBITDAF is outlined on page 1 of this report. The figures exclude the contribution of divested assets.
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
Report of the Chief ExecutiveInfratil Annual Report
SOLID PROGRESS AGAINST OUR STRATEGIC
OBJECTIVES
As the Chair’s letter notes, we’ve been focused on a very clear set of
medium-term strategic objectives through the year. These objectives
have guided a wide range of activity through FY26, and this activity has
delivered positive outcomes.
While we always make an investment decision with a view to holding an
asset for the long-term, one of our new strategic objectives in FY26 was
to divest businesses unlikely to scale under our ownership. This followed
a strategic review to consider the role of the various businesses within
the ‘pillars’ of our portfolio, and Infratil’s scale if we achieve our target
returns and grow our market cap to NZ$20 billion by 2030.
The outcome of this review was a decision to refine the portfolio and
divest those businesses unlikely to scale, or deliver meaningful returns,
under our ownership. Our initial goal was a medium-term target of
$1 billion from divestments. As at 26 May 2026 we were over halfway to
this target with more than NZ$600 million in sale proceeds received,
including:
• $55 million for a legacy property asset
• $217 million for our 20% stake in Fortysouth
• $333 million for our 50% stake in RetireAustralia
While Fortysouth is a high-quality business, it was a relatively small
position in our portfolio and was no longer a fit with our need for scaled
businesses with high target returns. RetireAustralia had not grown as
we’d hoped because of construction cost inflation in its core markets,
and a slower than expected transition in the operating model toward
more care and development. While progress had been made, the
timeframe required for better returns meant it made more sense to
redeploy our capital to near term opportunities.
We recently commenced a sale process for digital imaging business
Qscan. It is performing well and its projected returns look attractive, but
it is also unlikely to achieve the scale needed in our evolving portfolio.
While our portfolio companies are continuing to invest in growth
opportunities, one of our strategic goals is to balance our operating
cash flows and dividends in the medium term. We made good progress
in FY26, as income from our portfolio companies began to increase.
This narrowed our operating cash flow deficit, after cash dividends, to
$90 million from $120 million in FY25.
Our core ‘pillar 1’ assets – One NZ and Wellington Airport – have a clear
role as cash flow generators, with optimisation of those businesses to
drive continued distributions. As the charts on page 8 show, both
businesses are well established, with EBITDAF above their capital
expenditure requirements.
This stands in contrast to CDC and Longroad Energy where we are
beginning to see significant investment begin to deliver an uplift in
EBITDAF. While both businesses are currently designated as ‘pillar 2’
mature growth assets, our expectation is that they will also become
significant cash flow generators and graduate into pillar 1.
Over time, this earnings growth should enable them to fund their own
investment and distributions to Infratil. CDC, for example, is forecasting
its EBITDAF to exceed A$1 billion in FY28. Once fully deployed by the
end of FY29, its 1 gigawatt of contracted capacity is expected to deliver
annualised EBITDAF of approximately A$2 billion.
One NZ’s free cash flow is increasing and its distributions to Infratil more
than doubled to approximately NZ$180 million in the year. Although this
is two years later than we hoped, it is a creditable performance given
the soft economic conditions in New Zealand and increased market
competition.
ATTRACTIVE GLOBAL THEMATICSINFRASTRUCTURE CHARACTERISTICS
IDEAS
THAT
MATTER
PORTFOLIO
CONSTRUCTION
APPROACH
PILLAR 1
Cashflow generators
Scaled business with
enough diversity for
stability
PILLAR 2
Mature growth platforms
Scaled business, more
concentrated to drive
returns
PILLAR 3
Future growth platforms
Multiple smaller businesses
that can scale to $1bn+
over 3-5 years
*
Divest businesses unlikely to scale under
our ownership and reinvest
Balance Infratil’s cash flow and dividends
* Subject to a sale process at 31 March 2026.
7
Report of the Chief ExecutiveInfratil Annual Report
CDC and Longroad Energy have accelerated strongly throughout the
year and have compelling growth ahead of them. However, all good
things must come to an end, and our growth engines when we began
30 years ago were quite different. That cycle will continue. Renewing
our growth engines for the future is a continuous, long-term activity.
Our ‘pillar 3’ assets are those smaller businesses that we are looking to
develop into $1 billion-plus businesses over three to five years. We’re
continually reviewing this part of the portfolio to determine whether
these businesses can grow to this kind of scale. As I’ve mentioned,
Gurīn Energy is an example of one of these businesses that could be on
the cusp of success. The size of its proposed Indonesia to Singapore
solar and battery storage project means that, if it proceeds, it will
become a large-scale business very quickly. This would provide further
balance to CDC’s current concentration in the portfolio.
We’re always scanning for new infrastructure businesses that we could
add to this part of the portfolio, or in other pillars. Our investment in
Clearvision Ventures, for example, helps us identify and engage with
technology changes that could impact our businesses’ activities.
Clearvision is investing in companies that can drive meaningful
disruptions in energy and infrastructure sustainability.
I mentioned in my letter last year that we were interested in automated
logistics. We completed a lot of work on this idea, and we’re still
interested because returns appear attractive. However, it feels early for
us to be confident we can achieve the scale we need in a timeframe
that’s relevant, while introducing more complexity to the portfolio.
These considerations are front of mind at a time when we are still
refining the portfolio and we already have strong growth opportunities
across our existing investments.
As Infratil grows and our portfolio businesses become more global,
we’re seeing more international investor interest. This will help diversify
our shareholder base, benefitting all investors over time by deepening
the pool of potential investors.
ONE NZ
CDC
WELLINGTON AIRPORT
LONGROAD ENERGY
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
100
80
60
40
20
0
FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
1,400
800
1,0 00
1,200
600
400
200
0
NZ$m
NZ$m
NZ$m
NZ$m
FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
Proportionate capital expenditureProportionate EBITDAF
1,000
800
600
400
200
0
FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
Total capital invested Total realised proceeds Total unrealised proceeds
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
100
80
60
40
20
0
FY22
FY23FY24FY25FY26
1,400
800
1,0 00
1,200
600
400
200
0
NZ$m
NZ$m
NZ$m
NZ$m
FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
Proportionate capital expenditureProportionate EBITDAF
1,000
800
600
400
200
0
FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
Total capital invested Total realised proceeds Total unrealised proceeds
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
100
80
60
40
20
0
FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
1,400
800
1,0 00
1,200
600
400
200
0
NZ$m
NZ$m
NZ$m
NZ$m
FY22
FY23FY24FY25FY26
Proportionate capital expenditureProportionate EBITDAF
1,000
800
600
400
200
0
FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
Total capital invested Total realised proceeds Total unrealised proceeds
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
100
80
60
40
20
0
FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
1,400
800
1,0 00
1,200
600
400
200
0
NZ$m
NZ$m
NZ$m
NZ$m
FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
Proportionate capital expenditureProportionate EBITDAF
1,000
800
600
400
200
0
FY22
FY23FY24FY25FY26
Total capital invested Total realised proceeds Total unrealised proceeds
Those dynamics, and lower market valuations for One NZ’s closest
market comparator, Spark, have in turn driven a reduction in One NZ’s
independent valuation. We and the One NZ team have a strong set of
initiatives underway to recover that value. As you can see on page 10,
we have a solid track record of revealing value in large, integrated
businesses like One NZ over the years. This has included spinning out
One NZ’s towers business and Manawa Energy’s renewable energy
development business, Tilt.
Our cash flow will also be helped by our inaugural issuer credit rating
from S&P Global Ratings. The BBB+ credit rating reflects Infratil’s stable
funding, underpinned by substantial permanent capital and a track
record of strong investment performance. The rating will enable us to
broaden our funding options, enhance borrowing terms and reduce
financing costs.
Identify and scale our growth platforms
beyond CDC and Longroad Energy
Continue to broaden our shareholder base
and support future scale
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
We have a substantial investor relations programme that is raising
awareness of Infratil in Australia and beyond, while also continuing to
engage with our New Zealand investor base through direct and online
activity. Our inclusion in the S&P/ASX 200 from mid-2025 provided a
welcome boost to Australian investor interest, as well as from
international index and active investors. We’ve seen ASX trading
volumes grow significantly, and Australasian analyst coverage has
increased with about a dozen analysts now publishing research on
Infratil.
CDC’s success should encourage more Australian investors to consider
Infratil as an investment, although we have more work to do on helping
investors understand our model and that we’re more than just a data
centre business.
8
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
100
80
60
40
20
0
FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
1,400
800
1,0 00
1,200
600
400
200
0
NZ$m
NZ$m
NZ$m
NZ$m
FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
Proportionate capital expenditureProportionate EBITDAF
1,000
800
600
400
200
0
FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
Total capital invested Total realised proceeds Total unrealised proceeds
OUTLOOK
As we look to FY27, I’m confident in both our portfolio and the
opportunities ahead.
A key strength of our model is the discipline with which we keep testing
what we own against what else is out there. As Will Smales, Morrison’s
Chief Investment Officer, told our institutional investor audience in
September 2025, we’d reviewed several hundred investment ideas in
the prior year alone. This constant comparison helps ensure we’re
allocating capital to the opportunities we believe will deliver the best
long-term returns. In a fast changing world, that discipline matters.
Artificial intelligence is clearly front of mind. Our focus is on sifting
through the noise to understand what really matters for our existing
investments. We’re in a good position to do that. We see demand and
customer behaviour first-hand at CDC, we see the implications for
energy demand through Longroad Energy, and we’re seeing practical
applications of AI scale in One NZ and in teleradiology.
Through all that work, today, our core investment themes haven’t
changed. We continue to see the strongest opportunities in data
centres and renewable energy. They can meet our target returns in a
way that turns up in the share price (that is, at scale) and that growth
can be supported by our internally generated cash flows.
The growth in demand for efficient AI infrastructure is striking and may
be the investment opportunity of a lifetime. While computing chip
supply is well understood as a constraint, energy availability, supply
chain and labour shortages are emerging in the United States in
particular.
Longroad and CDC are established, scaled platforms with the capability
and experience to help meet this demand. Longroad has already signed
one project to supply a data centre and is establishing a dedicated data
centre development team. CDC’s new large-scale contract has
demonstrated Australasia’s opportunity to attract global computing
capacity, supported by regional stability, competitive build costs and
access to renewable energy.
Report of the Chief ExecutiveInfratil Annual Report
We’re exploring more opportunities to bring power and data centre
expertise together — delivering integrated solutions for customers in
a way that is more efficient and at greater scale. These opportunities
would require further funding and that may come from our existing
portfolio. As we assess the growth outlook and scale opportunities
for our existing assets, there is the potential for another $1 billion+ of
divestments over the medium term.
Across the portfolio, the near-term outlook is exciting. CDC is on track
to meet its target of doubling FY25 earnings by FY27. Solar and battery
storage remain the lowest-cost sources of new generation in many
markets, and we’ve agreed to provide a further US$300 million of equity
to Longroad to accelerate its growth. Gurīn Energy has an important
year ahead, with clarity on Indonesia’s export licence a potentially
transformational moment.
While those markets remain the most attractive for renewable
development today, we’re continuing to position our other platforms,
so they are ready to benefit as conditions improve in other regions.
As always, there’s plenty to be done and we’ll continue to invest wisely
to create further shareholder value.
Nga mihi nui,
Jason Boyes
Chief Executive
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
9
35.8% 5.7x9.6
16.5% 1.7x6.7
47.3% 3.3x9.4
17.4% 18.4x27.4
7.5% 1.1x0.7
15.4% 1.5x4.6
8.6% 1.3x4.8
44.4% 2.1x4.7
14.1% 1.8x5.3
9.9% 1.3x6.1
13.0% 1.8x10.1
N/M 1.0x0.3
14.4% 1.2x3.3
18.0% 6.6x31.3
0.1% 1.0x11.0
1.8% 1.1x3.4
8.4% 1.8x18.0
This page shows our track record of returns on investments that we held
or divested in FY26.
The first column shows our calculated Internal Rate of Return (IRR) on
each asset up to 31 March 2026. It is expressed as a percentage per
year return, based on the capital invested, cash flows, and the most
recent asset valuation.
The Money Multiple metric shows the total value generated by an
investment relative to the total capital invested. It does not consider the
duration of investment, which is shown in the third column. Manawa
Energy is our longest held investment at 31 years.
One of the reasons we have been able to achieve strong long-term
returns is our willingness to prioritise value over asset accumulation.
Where other owners may be unwilling to question the status quo, we’ll
embrace opportunities to reshape businesses where shareholder value
can be unlocked.
Notes:
1. Total capital invested is equal to the sum of all capital invested by Infratil into the
asset during the holding period, and consists of initial capital contributions,
shareholder loan contributions, capital calls, and acquisition of management
shares vesting under LTI schemes.
2. Total realised proceeds are equal to the sum of all distributions received by Infratil
during the holding period and consists of capital returns, shareholder loan interest
payments, shareholder loan principal payments, dividends, and subvention
payments.
3. Total unrealised proceeds are equal to the valuation of Infratil’s stake in each of
its assets.
4. A non-cash benefit equal to the value of Infratil’s share of Tilt on split from
Trustpower has been recognised in the total realised proceeds for Manawa Energy
to capture the value of the embedded option within Manawa.
5. A non-cash benefit equal to the value of Infratil's Anytime Radiology investment
has been recognised in Qscan and RHCNZ. This reflects the purchase of
teleradiology assets by Anytime Radiology and the value of the embedded
option within Qscan and RHCNZ.
6. As Contact Energy has been held for less than a year its IRR has been
de-annualised to reflect the shorter holding period.
Report of the Chief ExecutiveInfratil Annual Report
Total capital invested Total realised proceeds Total unrealised proceeds
Anytime Radiology
Infratil Infrastructure
Property
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
8,0009,0007,0006,0005,0004,0003,0002,0001,0000NZ$m
INFRATIL TRACK RECORD
10
Investment
Duration
(years)IRR
Money
Multiple
Divested assets - FY26
OUR MANAGEMENT MODEL
Global reach to identify new ideas that matter,
with offices across North America, Europe,
Asia and Australasia
Ongoing search for potential new infrastructure
opportunities
Access to larger-scale opportunities through
co-investment by multiple clients
Infratil invested alongside other Morrison clients in
assets such as Longroad Energy and CDC
Aligned interests through management
contract and maintaining a strong global
investment track record
Alignment with shareholders through incentives for
out-performance, and with Morrison entities and
related individuals holding ~6.5% of Infratil shares
~NZ$57 billion
Assets under management supported by a team
of 200+ professionals
~NZ$20.6 billion
Infratil leverages wider Morrison staff to manage
its 13 portfolio companies
Morrison has been Infratil’s manager since our
inception in 1994. Over this time, Morrison has
grown from being a New Zealand focused
infrastructure investor to managing a global
platform across private and listed markets.
This includes NZ$20.6 billion in assets managed for Infratil, along with
other large scale institutional clients and unlisted infrastructure funds.
Morrison’s global capability and scale is becoming more important as
Infratil grows and looks to develop new, larger investment opportunities.
Infratil’s Board oversees the strategic direction of the company,
including capital management, capital structure, risk management and
approving all investments and divestments. The Board has delegated
management responsibilities of Infratil to Morrison, with specific goals
and objectives set to align management efforts with Infratil’s strategic
priorities.
This management model has helped Infratil deliver superior shareholder
outcomes by providing:
• scale and sector expertise beyond Infratil’s independent capacity
• growing global reach and access to investment opportunities
• the ability to co-invest with other Morrison clients in larger assets
• strong alignment through Morrison shareholdings in Infratil and
performance incentives.
Management modelInfratil Annual Report
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
11
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
Management modelInfratil Annual Report
Finance
Tax & IR
Oversee Morrison investment
and asset management activity
Infratil CEO & CFO
Portfolio
Strategy
Legal & Risk
Morrison portfolio management team for InfratilMorrison Global Investment &
Asset Management Committees
Committees
include Infratil CEO/CFO
Sustainability
AN ACTIVE MANAGER
Active asset management is fundamental
to the preservation of capital and our
delivery of strong investment returns.
We take a hands-on approach to driving long-term business
performance to create shareholder value. We do this by creating
teams around each asset that bring to bear Morrison’s operational
and industry expertise, including sector specialists, tax, legal,
sustainability and research teams.
Infratil portfolio companies
DigitalRenewablesHealthcareAirports
Monitor Morrison, portfolio, and
portfolio company performance
Oversee capital allocation to
deliver shareholder returns
Review and approve strategy
Infratil Board
Morrison Global Investment & Asset Management functions
• Provide financial, strategy & research, management and governance expertise
• Originate new investment ideas
• Work closely with portfolio company Boards and Management
• Supplemented by a bench of 20+ sector experts and operating partners
Active management to maintain portfolio growth through cycles
• Drive financial and operational performance of portfolio companies
• Assist portfolio companies with strategic growth and value creation
• Dynamically allocate capital from cash flow generators to best 15%+ IRR opportunities
• Identify new investment opportunities to optimise portfolio cash flow and growth pillars
• Manage balance of cash flow and growth pillars and overall portfolio diversification and complexity as assets evolve
12
Management fee Incentive fee
• only for non-NZ assets
• hurdle: 12% increase in asset value
• fee: 20% of the outperformance above
the
hurdle
Infratil’s relationship with Morrison is governed
by an investment management agreement
that outlines Morrison’s responsibilities, and
the fee arrangements for its services.
The Board continually monitors Morrison’s performance to ensure
it is delivering value for shareholders and positioning Infratil for
continued success.
Morrison receives an annual management fee, with the fee varying
depending on whether an asset is part of the New Zealand or
international portfolio. An incentive fee may be payable where a
company has more than half of its assets outside New Zealand and a
minimum performance hurdle of 12% growth in asset value is achieved.
A high-level fee summary is shown in the diagram and a more detailed
fee model is available at https://infratil.com/for-investors/investor-
days/.
The management agreement includes a modified high-water mark
for incentive fees. This means that, in most instances, incentive
fees are not paid on one category without the recovery of any
underperformance of other fee categories.
An increase in incentive fees paid in recent years has reflected the
strong outperformance of our investments in Longroad Energy and
CDC, as determined by independent asset valuations. Independent
valuers are usually appointed by the Infratil Board for a three-year term
and are required to provide auditable, objective and market-based
assessments of fair value.
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
Management modelInfratil Annual Report
MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT
13
New Zealand portfolio fee
• calculated at varying rates on Infratil’s
company value (i.e. market capitalisation
+ book value of Australasian debt)
• FY26 fee equated to an average of ~0.88%
International portfolio fee
• calculated on 1.50% of acquisition cost
and Infratil’s debt for non-Australasian
companies
Annual fee
• applicable from fourth Infratil balance date
• calculated on qualifying assets’ valuation
growth from the prior year
• under-performance of individual assets is
netted off positive performance
Initial asset fee
• an asset is eligible on the third balance
date held by Infratil
• hurdle calculated on contributed capital
after being acquired
Realised asset fee
• calculated on gain from sale or other
realisation process
Single instalment
Single instalment
Paid in three annual
instalments and years 2-3
may be scaled down if the
fair value reduces from
the initial qualifying value
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
SustainabilityInfratil Annual Report
OUR SUSTAINABILITY STRATEGY
Governance
Have robust business and governance
processes to understand, actively manage and
be accountable for the ESG issues that matter.
Leadership
Be transparent, collaborative and follow
credible ESG standards and frameworks,
and influence for positive outcomes over the
long term.
Define the ideas that matter and find the opportunities where
ESG is evident eg: energy transition and social licence
Build conviction – ESG screening using Infratil’s Exclusion PolicyBuild conviction – ESG due diligence to inform decisions
Identify the value - investment decision and onboarding
including ESG considerations and plans
For example, considering ESG as part of:
• Shareholder agreements
• Onboarding plans
• Setting expectations
• Portfolio company reporting.
Invest wisely – active management, including ESG risks and
opportunities
We encourage our companies to identify and manage their material
ESG issues. On an ongoing basis, we assess and engage on:
• climate and environmental risks and opportunities
• ESG governance (including policy oversight), and
• ESG matters relating to people, communities and supply chains.
Benchmarking and reporting on material ESG matters
Infratil produces its own ESG & climate reports and increasingly
so do its portfolio companies:
• all companies report emissions and complete GRESB
assessments
• Infratil targets 60% of its portfolio having SBTi targets by end
of FY28 and 100% by end of FY30: FY26 = 23%
• $2.4m proportionate community investment, including Infratil.
Climate and Nature
Catalyse a rapid and efficient transition to a
low-carbon, resilient future, while protecting
and restoring nature.
People
Support our people and communities to thrive
from an intellectual, physical, cultural and
economic perspective.
POST-INVESTMENT
Material ESG issues are integrated across the investment process.
PRE-INVESTMENT
Material ESG issues are considered prior to committing capital.
We believe investing wisely means taking a long-term view and meeting the expectations of customers, communities and capital providers. It also requires the development of infrastructure that is resilient, sustainable and
well governed and managed. As well as focusing on sustainability at an Infratil level, we work closely with our portfolio businesses to support their own sustainability efforts and deliver real world outcomes. Our activity is
focused across the four pillars of our sustainability strategy.
Ultimately, decisions grounded in responsible stewardship are part of creating long-term value and managing risk. That’s why we also integrate sustainability considerations through our investment process.
14
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
SustainabilityInfratil Annual Report
SUSTAINABILITY IN ACTION
CDC DATA CENTRES
Not all data centres are created equal. CDC was born during Australia’s
‘Millennium Drought’, and this drove a focus on sustainability. Today,
CDC is a sector leader in this space. In FY26, CDC achieved Net Zero
emissions within its defined target boundary which includes scope 1,
scope 2 and defined scope 3 emissions (travel, waste and customer
electricity).
As part of achieving this in FY26, CDC and its customers volume-
matched all electricity used in its facilities with 100% renewable
electricity. CDC’s data centres are energy efficient supporting a range
of technologies including liquid-to-chip cooling systems which require
less energy for cooling than traditional methods. CDC also works with
grid operators to support grid stability and capacity by investing in the
development of electricity infrastructure, such as substations.
CDC is also a sector leader in water conservation. Unlike traditional data
centres that consume large volumes of water for cooling, CDC has
implemented a closed-loop liquid cooling system from day one across
all CDC-built facilities, resulting in near-zero ongoing water
consumption for primary cooling, whilst remaining energy efficient. This
means CDC does not consume up to billions of litres of water every
year when compared to traditional evaporative cooling methods. This
provides an advantage for CDC’s resilience and sustainability, as well
as a commercial and social licence advantage, helping expedite
consenting for new CDC sites in areas where water supply is limited.
GURĪN ENERGY
Gurīn Energy integrates sustainability across the full project lifecycle.
Environmental and social risks - such as biodiversity, Indigenous
Peoples, resettlement, land acquisition, community safety and
security, and physical climate exposure - are assessed from early
site screening through development and delivery.
Where projects proceed, impact assessments are aligned with
international frameworks including the Equator Principles 4 (EP4) and
the International Finance Corporation (IFC) Performance Standards
on Environmental and Social Sustainability. Risks are managed using
a hierarchy of management measures – avoid, minimise, mitigate –
and where residual impacts remain, compensate, offset or remedy.
For example, the environmental permit for the Zambales project in the
Philippines required replacement trees (50-100 times the number
Gurīn Energy removed) to be planted in a designated area.
Gurīn Energy maintains an environmental and social management
system aligned with the IFC Performance Standards, ILO conventions
and other relevant international frameworks. The system is integrated
into all business activities at every stage of project development,
construction and operation. These activities include land acquisition,
community engagement, labour management and contractor
practices. Expectations for employees, contractors and suppliers are
set by Gurīn Energy’s Code of Conduct, Human Rights Policy and
Supplier Code of Conduct.
MEASURING OUR PROGRESS
We measure and report our progress on the ESG issues that matter in
the Sustainability Reporting section of our website. Our key governance
documents, policies and Modern Slavery reporting are in the
Governance section of our website.
Our ESG performance is assessed by a range of external frameworks
shown in the table below. The ratings are used by our investors and
stakeholders in their capital allocation and engagement decisions, and
they support inclusion in ESG indices. Reflecting our progress, in May
2026, Infratil was included in the Dow Jones Best in Class Australia
Index for the first time.
Each year, our portfolio companies participate in the globally
recognised, independent GRESB Infrastructure assessment. Infratil’s
overall GRESB Fund score has continued to increase, with our 2025
management score ranking first globally, out of 135 peers. Wellington
Airport achieved a GRESB five-star rating and 98/100 score in their
sector, while One NZ scored 93/100 and ranked second in Oceania.
Rating bodyLatest ratingPrior ratingRating range
GRESB94860-100
MSCI ESGAAACCC to AAA
S&P CSA38230-100; industry
average 29
Sustainalytics
ESG Risk
6.68.50-10 = negligible risk;
40+ = severe risk
Forsyth Barr (NZ)
Climate & ESG
A-B+D to A+
CDPBCD to A
15
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Our management model
Sustainability
Our portfolio
Financial Performance
Corporate governance
Directory
16
Report of the Chief ExecutiveInfratil Annual Report
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
PortfolioInfratil Annual Report
ENABLING
IDEAS THAT
MATTER
16
CDC Data Centres (CDC) is a leading Australasian provider of data
centre infrastructure, with 25 operating and under construction
facilities across Canberra, Sydney, Melbourne, Perth and Auckland.
The business has built a strong track record of delivering large-scale,
future-ready and sustainable campuses for customers, with more than
90% of revenue derived from investment-grade rated counterparties
and a weighted average lease expiry of about 27 years, including
options. CDC is a trusted provider to Australian government agencies,
operating facilities designed to meet stringent federal security and
sovereignty requirements.
CDC continues to benefit from rising demand for secure, resilient,
high-quality data centre capacity, supported by the ongoing
densification of computing equipment, which enables greater
computing power within the same physical footprint. To meet this
demand, CDC is investing significantly in new capacity, with
construction progressing at its second Sydney and Melbourne
campuses. CDC recently celebrated the opening of its Brooklyn
campus in Melbourne and commenced construction of its first Perth
campus.
As its footprint has expanded, CDC has delivered strong earnings
growth, underpinned by long-term customer contracts, a high-quality
tenant base and favourable structural trends in digital infrastructure
demand. This saw its EBITDAF lift almost 20% in FY26, with growth
expected to accelerate further in FY27.
Construction at CDC’s Laverton
campus, Melbourne.
2016$8.9b49.7%35.8%
First investedValuation NZ$Infratil ownershipIRR
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Digital
Renewables
Airports
Healthcare
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
Portfolio / Digital infrastructureCDCInfratil Annual Report
17
FY26 Developments
• Strong, growing demand with 220MW ICT capacity invoiced at
the end of FY26
• 671MW built operating capacity and 572MW under construction
at end of FY26
• Future build pipeline capacity of 1,663MW to FY34
• Densification is enabling CDC to deploy more capacity within
the same building envelope, extracting greater value from land,
building and infrastructure investments
CDC enters FY27 with strong momentum
following the award of a 555MW contract,
the largest data centre contract in
Australia’s history, in May 2026.
This took CDC’s total contracted capacity to more than 1GW and
materially improved medium-term earnings visibility. This new capacity
is scheduled to come online through FY28 and FY29, supporting
expectations that EBITDAF will exceed A$1 billion in FY28 and reach
approximately A$2 billion on an annualised basis when fully deployed.
Demand fundamentals for Australasian data centre space remain
compelling, driven by cloud, AI and increasing computing density.
Customers are seeking scalable, efficient and sustainable
infrastructure, with CDC’s demand-led, agile development model
helping manage execution and utilisation risk. It is a trusted provider to
Australian government agencies, operating facilities designed to meet
stringent federal security and sovereignty requirements.
Its competitive position is further strengthened by its in-house design
innovation expertise that enables the deployment of liquid cooling
technology for computing equipment and CDC’s industry-leading
closed loop cooling technology, which minimises water consumption to
near zero. This also enhances operational resilience and lowers risks for
customers because CDC builds data centres that are not reliant on
mains water availability for cooling.
With significant contracted demand, a differentiated product offering
and supportive long-term investors, CDC is well positioned to continue
scaling earnings and cash flow over the medium term. With CDC
Australia being assigned a public Baa2 (Stable) credit rating by Moody’s
Ratings in April 2026, CDC has the added ability to access global debt
and hybrid capital markets to help fund this growth.
Operating capacity 671MW
Under construction 572MW
Data Centres
Perth
Sydney
Melbourne
Canberra
Auckland
34MW
210MW
181MW
20MW
156MW
237MW
308MW
98MW
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Digital
Renewables
Airports
Healthcare
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
Portfolio / Digital infrastructureCDCInfratil Annual Report
18
Key financials – 31 March A$m20262025
Revenue534446
EBITDAF393330
EBITDAF margin74%74%
Capital expenditure2,1131,760
Net Debt4,8813,499
Credit ratingBaa2 (stable)
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Digital
Renewables
Airports
Healthcare
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
One NZ is a leading telecommunications provider in New Zealand,
offering mobile, broadband and enterprise connectivity services to
consumer, business and government customers. It operates a
nationwide mobile network serving about 2 million connections and
offers fixed line services through a combination of its own EonFibre
business and wholesale providers’ networks.
Infratil’s history with One NZ began in 2019, as part of a consortium
that purchased the business from Vodafone Group plc. This marked
Infratil’s first significant investment in telecommunications
infrastructure and services. In 2023, Infratil acquired control of the
rebranded One NZ.
Today, One NZ has a strong market position, underpinned by its brand,
distribution channels and customer base. Ongoing investments in 5G
and fibre are supporting revenue resilience and future growth, while the
business is focused on disciplined cost management and sustainable
cash generation.
One NZ performed well in mobile in FY26, maintaining its Pay Monthly
mobile share despite competitive pressure. This was supported by its
One Wallet and One NZ Satellite differentiation. Customers have also
embraced One Wallet as the way to upgrade to their next phone, with
most of One NZ’s interest free phone sales now going through the
scheme.
FY26 Developments
• Achieved 4% revenue growth in challenging, low growth market
• 5G network investment achieved 70% population coverage
• 2G and 3G networks shut down, enabling spectrum re-use
• One NZ Satellite capability expanded from messaging to include
data and voice calling via select apps on eligible phones
• EonFibre growing high-capacity demand as a standalone
network business
• FY26 free cash flow up $67m (vs FY25) with reduced investment
and working capital discipline
• ‘Medium Company of the Year Award’ in the Global Sustainability
Awards
Key financials – 31 March NZ$m20262025
Revenue1,9981,921
EBITDAF609605
EBITDAF margin30%31%
Capital expenditure246270
Net Debt1,4931,438
Image from One NZ’s multi-year
brand advertising campaign ‘Let’s Get
Connected’, voted New Zealand’s
favourite campaign of the summer.
2019$3.4b99.8%16.5%
First investedValuation NZ$Infratil ownershipIRR
Portfolio / Digital infrastructureOne NZInfratil Annual Report
19
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Digital
Renewables
Airports
Healthcare
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
One NZ mobile Pay Monthly connections
have proved resilient in a highly competitive
market, underpinning steady revenue
growth. Innovative propositions, such as
One NZ Satellite and One Wallet, are
helping improve service options and
affordability, while reducing customer
churn.
The final switch-off of legacy 2G and 3G networks in March 2026
enables more efficient use of spectrum for 4G and 5G connectivity,
supporting improved speeds, coverage, and reliability. Ongoing
investment in mobile coverage has extended 5G coverage to 70% of
the population, along with upgrades to strengthen network resilience
and performance. At the same time, One NZ Satellite functionality has
expanded beyond messaging to include data and voice calling via
select apps on eligible phones, further strengthening coverage in
remote areas, with customers sending over 15 million messages
through space since launch in December 2024.
One NZ has continued to successfully transform itself into an ‘AI first,
human where it matters most’ organisation at the forefront of
innovation in the sector, working with global partners to embed AI
across the organisation. This year One NZ moved beyond feasibility
pilots which have helped drive adoption, to making strategic
investments – including upskilling employees – intended to scale AI
solutions to all parts of the telco value chain.
Portfolio / Digital infrastructureOne NZInfratil Annual Report
The recently opened
One New Zealand Stadium at
Te Kaha, in Christchurch.
20
With over 50 AI solutions live, One NZ is rewiring the organisation. It
is seeing improvements in delivering software, operational efficiency
through process automation, and customer experience improvements
through agentic support in the call centres. Better network
management has also been achieved with improved ability to spot
and respond to network anomalies.
One NZ’s “sector-leading, purpose-led sustainability” received
international recognition during the year when it won the ‘Medium
Company of the Year Award’ in the Global Sustainability Awards.
One NZ has continued to invest in infrastructure in ways to support
sustainability, including with reduced electricity usage through AI
driven network optimisation. Rooftop solar generation was installed
at a Christchurch data centre to support site operations and network
assets at the neighbouring One New Zealand Stadium.
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Digital
Renewables
Airports
Healthcare
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
Portfolio / Digital infrastructureKao DataInfratil Annual Report
Kao Data continues to grow as a specialist developer and operator of
advanced, highly sustainable colocation data centres across the United
Kingdom. The business remains focused on hosting technically
demanding workloads, with a client base spanning high-performance
computing and AI, enterprise, and cloud providers.
Kao’s flagship asset is its 15-acre campus in Harlow, located within the
“Innovation Corridor” between London and Cambridge. The campus
has land, power and planning consent for four data centres, of which
two are currently operational and serving customers, with a third under
construction. During the period, Kao secured a 10-year agreement
with an international neocloud provider for a 22MW deployment at
Harlow, further evidencing strong demand for AI and high-density
computing capacity.
Kao continues to expand its development pipeline. In March 2026, the
business completed the acquisition of a 4.7-acre greenfield site at Park
Royal in West London. The site will be redeveloped into a new, highly
efficient and sustainable data centre, with a targeted ready-for-service
date of 2029. The project represents a strategic growth option,
providing near-term capacity and strengthening Kao’s presence in one
of Europe’s most sought-after data centre markets. As the site sits
within a prime West London availability zone, it is expected to be
attractive across all customer segments, including hyperscale.
Sustainability and energy resilience remain central to Kao’s strategy.
At Harlow, the business has entered into an agreement to procure up
to 40MW of solar power via a private wire arrangement, supporting
its pathway to net zero operations by 2030 while improving long-term
energy security and cost visibility.
FY26 Developments
• Operating capacity increased from 29MW to 37MW
• New contracts driving revenue growth
• Further 18MW under construction at Harlow campus
• Future build pipeline lifted to 106MW with addition of West
London sites
Key financials – 31 March £m20262025
Revenue4838
EBITDAF54
EBITDAF margin10%11%
Capital expenditure20273
Net Debt252110
Kao Data’s Harlow Campus, located
between London and Cambridge,
United Kingdom.
2021$865m54.7%15.4%
First investedValuation NZ$Infratil ownershipIRR
21
2016$2.4b42.5%47.3%
First investedValuation NZ$Infratil ownershipIRR
Longroad Energy develops, owns and operates utility-scale solar,
battery storage and wind projects across the United States. Its
operating capacity is increasing rapidly, supported by record underlying
demand for new electricity supply. This demand is driven by
electrification, data centre development, manufacturing onshoring
and decarbonisation.
Longroad generates revenue through long-term contracted
arrangements for electricity supply and generation or storage capacity
with utility, corporate and municipal counterparties. During the year,
434MW of new capacity entered operation, taking owned operating
capacity to 3.5GW, with another 2GW under construction at year end.
Longroad also advanced its development pipeline, qualifying more
projects for tax credits. This is expected to facilitate a higher
development cadence in the medium term.
The increasing scale of the operating portfolio is contributing to
stronger earnings, with EBITDAF up 170% in FY26.
FY26 Developments
• Serrano (Utah), a 434MW solar and battery storage project,
entered operation
• Operating owned capacity increased to 3.5GW
• 2GW of projects were under construction at year end, up from
1GW in FY25
• More than 6GW of solar and storage projects now tax
credit qualified
Key financials – 31 March US$m20262025
Revenue356222
EBITDAF12145
EBITDAF margin34%20%
Capital expenditure1,0871,485
Net Debt3,7953,270
The Sun Pond solar and battery
project in Arizona.
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Digital
Renewables
Airports
Healthcare
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
Portfolio / Renewable infrastructureLongroad EnergyInfratil Annual Report
22
Operating 2,347MW 729MW 458MW
Under construction 1,665MW 210MW 100MW
Arizona
SolarBatteryWindTransmission
Texas
Arkansas
New Mexico
California
Utah
Minnesota
Maine
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Digital
Renewables
Airports
Healthcare
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
533MW
723MW
121MW
400MW
67MW
1,093MW
729MW
306MW
111MW
85MW
75MW
50MW
100MW
522MW
98MW
282MW
31MW
184MW
Despite what some media headlines might
suggest, renewable energy is doing the
heavy lifting when it comes to meeting the
growth in United States’ electricity demand.
After years of modest growth in U.S. electricity consumption, the
American Clean Power Association projects demand to increase by
~30% to 50% by 2040. The U.S. Energy Information Administration
expects a record 86GW of new utility-scale generating capacity to
be added in 2026, with 93% of this coming from solar, battery storage
and wind.
Communities are benefitting, with the Sun Pond solar and storage
project recently beginning to deliver 111MW solar power and 85MW
battery storage for several not-for-profit power providers. The project
will generate enough electricity to power about 35,000 average
American homes. Sun Pond is projected to avoid over 145,000 metric
tons of CO₂ emissions annually, the equivalent of taking nearly 34,000
petrol-powered passenger cars off the road each year.
Sun Pond is part of the larger Longroad Sun Streams Complex, a
four-project complex totalling nearly 1.6GW of solar and storage
capacity located in Maricopa County, Arizona. The entire complex is
providing more than US$300 million in benefits to Arizona schools and
communities through its long-term leases with the Arizona State Land
Department and tax remittances.
Portfolio / Renewable infrastructureLongroad EnergyInfratil Annual Report
23
Data centres are an increasingly important source of incremental
electricity demand. Longroad’s 1,000 Mile project is being developed
to supply a Meta data centre, and the business is increasing its focus
on this segment. To create opportunities for co-located data centre
development, by Longroad or partners, Longroad has submitted
multiple applications to connect data centre loads to transmission
networks. These applications are at existing project sites for multi-
gigawatts of load.
Longroad is seeking to increase its future contracted revenues by
continuing to advance its development pipeline, including through
selective large-scale acquisitions. The time is right for well positioned
and well capitalised businesses in this sector to grow. Infratil has
agreed to provide an additional US$300 million of equity in FY27 to
help Longroad take up this opportunity and accelerate its growth.
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Digital
Renewables
Airports
Healthcare
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
Portfolio / Renewable infrastructureContact EnergyInfratil Annual Report
2025$1.4b14.1%7.5%
First investedValuation NZ$Infratil ownershipIRR (nine months)
Contact Energy is a listed company within Infratil’s portfolio. One of
New Zealand’s largest energy generators and retailers, Contact has
over 650,000 customer connections across electricity, gas,
broadband and mobile plans.
Infratil held 14.1% of Contact shares at the end of FY26, after first
acquiring about 9.5% in July 2025, as part of the sale of Infratil’s 51%
stake in Manawa Energy. On 20 May 2026, Infratil announced it had
reduced its holding by 5% to support future growth opportunities across
its portfolio. Infratil remains confident in Contact and the sector’s
outlook.
Contact operates 11 power stations across New Zealand, using
geothermal, hydro and thermal energy. With 3–5TWh of new grid
demand expected in the next five years, its Contact31+ strategy will
see it invest in the infrastructure required to support a more renewable,
resilient and affordable energy future for New Zealand.
Contact’s merger of Manawa Energy’s assets, together with a full
period of generation at the new Te Huka 3 geothermal plant, helped
drive a lift in Contact’s half-year earnings announced in February 2026.
Renewable generation was 97% of total electricity generation in the
half-year and Contact plans to use funding from its $575 million equity
raise to advance various battery storage, solar farm and geothermal
projects.
Contact's geothermal steam turbine
power station at Tauhara, in Taupō,
New Zealand.
24
Contact HY26 Developments
• $500 million EBITDAF in the 6-months to 31 December 2025
• Manawa Energy acquisition added 1.3TWh via hydro generation and
PPA contracts
• >80% of identified Manawa acquisition cost synergies secured in the
first six months of ownership
• Te Huka 3 plant online, supporting higher geothermal generation
Gurīn Energy has established a pipeline of ~8GW of solar, wind and
energy storage projects across a number of Asian markets. It is taking
a disciplined approach, balancing growth with regulatory, market and
execution risk, while developing assets aligned to long term demand
fundamentals.
Its flagship development is the large utility-scale Vanda RE solar and
battery project to deliver power from Indonesia to Singapore. Gurīn
Energy has a 75% stake in the project.
In mid-March 2026, the Indonesian Government granted Vanda RE
a permit to generate, distribute and sell electricity. This coincided
with bilateral discussions between the Indonesian and Singaporean
governments aimed at finalising a framework for cross border
renewable energy trade and investment. This process is taking longer
than we’d hoped and an Indonesian export licence is a key approval
required before we can make a final investment decision.
Another key development is the 240MW/960MWh battery storage
project in Japan which has reached ready-to-build status, having
secured a grid connection and the requisite land.
In the meantime, Gurīn Energy’s Zambales Province solar project has
completed its first year of operations in the Philippines and another
39MW solar plant is under construction in Tarlac Province.
FY26 Developments
• 100% of private land secured for Vanda RE; received domestic
Indonesian electricity production licence
• 240MW/960MWh battery storage project in Japan reached
ready-to-build status
• Acquired South Korean ~300MW wind + solar pipeline in
October 2025
• Tarlac Province solar project (39MW) expected to be operational
Q3 FY27
• Advanced projects with associated data centre supply
opportunities in Malaysia
2021$553m95.0%44.4%
First investedValuation NZ$Infratil ownershipIRR
Operating capacity 75MW
In development 5,449MW 2,678MW 112MW
Philippines
Malaysia
SolarWindBattery
Japan
South Korea
Thailand
Indonesia
Singapore
Project Vanda
75MW
105MW
2,072MW
25MW
818MW
2,200MW
1,250MW
614MW
458MW
112MW
585MW
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Digital
Renewables
Airports
Healthcare
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
Portfolio / Renewable infrastructureGurīn EnergyInfratil Annual Report
25
Mint Renewables was established in late 2022 to develop
renewable energy projects, including large scale solar and
energy storage, in Australia. Mint’s project pipeline is
early-stage with around 3GW of wind, solar and storage
opportunities across Australia and New Zealand.
In August 2025, Mint announced its entry into New Zealand,
through a strategic partnership with Ngāi Tahu Holdings.
Mint Aotearoa is targeting large-scale renewable energy
developments across Aotearoa, with an initial NZ$100 million
investment programme. It combines Mint’s technical
expertise and deep development experience in renewable
energy with Ngāi Tahu Holdings’ strong regional leadership
and relationships, rooted in Ngāi Tahu values and iwi
governance structures.
FY26 Developments
• Secured environmental approval for large-scale battery
energy storage system in Victoria, Australia
• Establishment of Mint Aotearoa (Mint Renewables, Ngai
Tahu Holdings JV) and commencement of development in
New Zealand market
• Progressed a number of Australian projects towards
lodgement of environmental approvals expected in FY27
First invested2022
Infratil ownership73.00%
Net asset value NZ$m45
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Digital
Renewables
Airports
Healthcare
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
Portfolio / Renewable infrastructureGalileoInfratil Annual Report
2020
First invested
$257m
Valuation NZ$
38.0%
Infratil ownership
9.9%
IRR
Galileo is a European renewable energy development platform with a
pipeline exceeding 16GW across 10 markets, spanning solar, battery
storage, and offshore and onshore wind. To date, Galileo has focused
on originating and scaling a diversified, high-quality development
portfolio, leveraging its development capability and selected
partnerships.
Historically, value has been realised through project advancement,
preconstruction asset sales, and capital recycling as projects mature.
As European renewable energy markets have evolved, with returns
affected by higher delivery costs, Galileo has begun refining its strategy
toward a build-to-own model. This will see it focus on fewer markets
where power demand, power prices, connection conditions and
regulation allow pipeline deployment at attractive returns
The change in Galileo’s development approach seeks to follow the
evolution of some of Infratil’s other renewable energy investments,
where their markets have matured.
In the meantime, the softening values across early stage development
projects, together with write offs or write downs following the strategy
reset, meant Galileo’s independent valuation reduced during the year.
As the new strategy is implemented, we expect to see Galileo improve
portfolio quality, support long-term value creation and provide greater
exposure to contracted operating assets.
During the year, Galileo completed construction of its first solar farm in
Lombardy, Italy, and executed construction contracts for a further 5MW
project in Lombardy, with construction scheduled to commence in
mid-2026.
26
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Digital
Renewables
Airports
Healthcare
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
Portfolio / AirportsWellington AirportInfratil Annual Report
Wellington Airport continued to demonstrate its resilience in a
challenging operating environment. Strong performance across the
international and commercial (non-aeronautical) businesses, together
with a continued focus on efficiencies, delivered increased EBITDAF
for the year.
This was achieved despite weak macroeconomic conditions and
ongoing domestic airline fleet availability issues, which resulted in
a decline in total passenger numbers from 5.3 million in FY25 to
5.1 million. Domestic passenger volumes fell by around 6%, partly
offset by a 4% increase in international passengers, supported by
expanded trans-Tasman services and stronger inbound demand.
Significant investment was made during the year, including upgrades
to runway safety, terminal enhancements, and the construction of a
new fire station. These investments position the airport for improved
connectivity and future growth. In particular, the runway safety
upgrade enables modern widebody aircraft to connect Wellington
directly to hubs in Asia.
Wellington Airport installed the
engineered materials arresting
system (EMAS) safety zones at each
end of the runway.
1998$1.07b66.0%17.4%
First investedValuation NZ$Infratil ownershipIRR
27
FY26 Developments
• EBITDAF increased 2% to $133 million
• Strong growth in international demand partly offset reduced
domestic passenger volumes
• $112 million invested in infrastructure improvements
• Runway upgrade enhances safety and enables long-haul flights
• New car park providing 800 additional spaces
• 98/100 score in the GRESB sustainability assessment
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Digital
Renewables
Airports
Healthcare
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
Portfolio / AirportsWellington AirportInfratil Annual Report
Wellington Airport is well positioned for
sustainable long-term growth as a critical
gateway for the Wellington region and
New Zealand.
A highlight of the year was the completion of the Engineered Materials
Arresting System (EMAS) in March 2026. This technological upgrade
provides enhanced runway safety performance for aircraft operators
while adding to the capability of the runway. The installation of the
system achieved a 143 metre increase in landing distance and a
37 metre increase in take-off distance which can now be utilised by
operators. Combined with more fuel-efficient next-generation aircraft,
these enhancements create opportunities for new services and routes
to major hubs in Asia and North America.
International demand remains strong, with travel to and from Australia
and Fiji, and onward connections to Asia, showing robust growth.
Domestic aviation headwinds persisted throughout the year, with airline
fleet capacity constraints dampening demand. As these constraints
begin to ease, aviation fuel prices more than doubled during the final six
weeks of the financial year due to the latest Middle East conflict. This
has prompted domestic airlines to trim future flight schedules and is
likely to continue until there is a clear resolution to the conflict.
Commercial upgrades across the terminal included the opening of
Good Day, a new multi-level bar and café. Several specialty stores also
opened, and new tenancies were added to the investment property
portfolio. These initiatives have helped diversify and strengthen
Wellington Airport’s financial position ahead of what is likely to be
another challenging year for the aviation sector.
28
The new Good Day cafe, bar and
dining space in Wellington Airport’s
terminal.
Key financials – 31 March NZ$m20262025
Revenue181177
EBITDAF133130
EBITDAF margin74%74%
Capital expenditure112117
Net Debt826736
Credit ratingBBB (stable)BBB (stable)
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Digital
Renewables
Airports
Healthcare
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
Portfolio / HealthcareRHCNZInfratil Annual Report
RHCNZ Medical Imaging is New Zealand’s
largest private diagnostic imaging provider,
comprising Pacific Radiology, Auckland
Radiology and Bay Radiology.
It operates a nationwide network of 66 clinics and offers a full range of
imaging services including X ray, ultrasound, CT, MRI and PET-CT scans.
These services play a critical role in early diagnosis and treatment
planning, supporting both public and private healthcare systems.
RHCNZ is increasingly positioned as a scaled and integrated healthcare
platform. Its growth is underpinned by strong structural tailwinds,
including an ageing population, rising prevalence of chronic disease,
increased utilisation of imaging services, and system-wide demand for
more efficient and accessible diagnostic solutions. The group benefits
from its national footprint, clinical reputation, and strong relationships
with referrers and funders, enabling it to deliver consistent, high-quality
care across regions.
In FY26, RHCNZ continued to strengthen its clinical capacity and
operational performance. The radiologist workforce increased during
the year, supporting higher scan volumes, with the group delivering
approximately 10,000 additional scans compared to FY25. Two new
flagship clinics were opened in Auckland and Dunedin during the year.
Both sites are equipped with state-of-the-art PET-CT scanners, while
the Auckland clinic also features the Southern Hemisphere’s most
advanced analogue SPECT-CT scanner.
RHCNZ is also targeting growth in under-served regions, with plans to
expand imaging services into Wānaka, Masterton, Palmerston North
and Rangiora to strengthen regional healthcare infrastructure and
improve access to high-quality diagnostics.
EBITDAF reduced due to a combination of cost inflation, heightened
competitive dynamics, and changes in service mix. The group is
actively managing these pressures through ongoing cost discipline,
pricing strategies, and operational efficiency initiatives.
Key financials – 31 March NZ$m20262025
Revenue373370
EBITDAF121126
EBITDAF margin32%34%
Capital expenditure4749
Net Debt425428
2021
First invested
$616m
Valuation NZ$
56.8%
Infratil ownership
8.6%
IRR
29
FY26 developments
• 1.02 million scans, up from 1.01 million in FY25
• Radiologist workforce increased by six to 170
• New clinics in Auckland and Dunedin delivering advanced
diagnostic imaging
• Increase in imaging machines, located across 66 standalone clinics
Anytime Radiology is a dedicated teleradiology platform
established in late 2025, formed by separating and
combining the respective teleradiology capabilities of the
RHCNZ and Qscan businesses to enhance the delivery,
reliability, and performance of diagnostic imaging services
across Australasia.
Formed in response to growing demand for high-quality,
around-the-clock reporting, the business focuses on
providing urgent after-hours and remote radiology services
to hospitals and healthcare providers. It operates a global
network of radiologists, enabling continuous coverage
through a distributed model with hubs in London, Sydney,
Auckland, and Christchurch. This network supports
approximately 57 acute hospitals across Australia and
New Zealand, providing scalable access to diagnostic
expertise regardless of location or time of day.
The platform offers a comprehensive range of services,
including 24/7 after-hours reporting, overflow capacity
support, and access to subspecialist expertise. Its operating
model ensures consistent turnaround times and integrates
seamlessly with hospital workflows, supported by a robust
technology and clinical governance framework that prioritises
accuracy, security, and reliability.
Anytime Radiology is expected to play an increasingly
important role in supporting healthcare systems facing
workforce constraints and growing imaging demand,
improving access to timely diagnosis and contributing to
better patient outcomes across the region.
First invested2025
Infratil ownership59.40%
Net asset value NZ$m114
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Digital
Renewables
Airports
Healthcare
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
30
Portfolio / HealthcareQscanInfratil Annual Report
Qscan Group (Qscan) is one of Australia’s largest diagnostic imaging
providers and operates a national network of 80 clinics across
metropolitan and regional Australia. It delivers a full suite of imaging
services including X ray, ultrasound, CT, MRI and PET. The business is
recognised for clinical excellence and subspecialty expertise,
particularly in high value and complex imaging (CT, MRI, and PET).
Qscan is a strong performer, delivering double digit EBITDAF growth
despite sector-wide inflationary pressures. This growth has been
supported by increasing demand, pricing discipline, a focus on complex
modalities, and leveraging the business’ differentiated technology
platform as it scales.
In FY26, Qscan continued to expand its footprint and capability. This
included both organic expansion of existing clinics and the integration
of seven additional practices into the platform. The business is also
investing in advanced imaging modalities and digital tools. This includes
AI-assisted scanning and reporting to improve productivity and clinical
outcomes.
2026 developments
• Launch of advanced AI tools in both clerical and clinical domains,
improving productivity, quality of bookings, and clinical outcomes
• Divestment of teleradiology business to Anytime Radiology, enabling
stronger focus on core business growth and capabilities
• 1.50 million scans, up from 1.45 million in FY25, with strong growth in
complex modalities
• Radiologist headcount increased by 28 to 192
• 80 standalone clinics, up 6 from FY25
2020
First invested
$590m
Valuation NZ$
59.5%
Infratil ownership
14.1%
IRR
Anytime Radiology
Key financials – 31 March A$m20262025
Revenue354316
EBITDAF8777
EBITDAF margin24%24%
Capital expenditure2821
Net Debt250275
HOW INFRATIL ACCOUNTS FOR ITS INVESTMENTS
The front section of this Annual Report
describes the operational performance
and strategic progress of Infratil’s material
investments over the year.
This overview is provided to help readers navigate from that operational
commentary to the financial statements that follow.
Infratil’s portfolio includes investments with different ownership
structures, and the way each investment is reflected in the financial
statements depends on the level of control or influence Infratil has over
that business. As a result, different accounting treatments apply, which
affects how revenue, profits, assets and liabilities are presented.
Infratil prepares its financial statements using New Zealand accounting
standards (NZ IFRS) and reports in New Zealand dollars (NZD). The
accounts are prepared on a consolidated basis, meaning they present
Infratil together with the businesses it controls as a single group, rather
than as separate companies.
Because Infratil invests internationally, some portfolio companies
prepare their accounts in other currencies or under different
accounting standards (such as US GAAP). In these cases,
management translates the results back into NZD and adjusts them
so they are presented consistently under NZ IFRS.
Together, these factors mean that operational performance discussed
earlier in the report may be reflected differently in the financial
statements, depending on the ownership structure of each investment.
This overview explains how those connections are made and provides
context for understanding the financial results that follow.
Broadly, Infratil’s investments fall into three categories:
1. Subsidiary companies (where Infratil has control)
2. Associate companies (where Infratil has significant influence but
not control)
3. Investments measured at fair value (where Infratil has neither
significant influence or control)
Infratil generally seeks to invest in companies where it has control or
significant influence, allowing it to influence strategy and long term
value creation.
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
31
PortfolioInfratil Annual Report
SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES – FULLY CONSOLIDATED
Where Infratil controls a business, it is treated as part of the Group.
How this appears in the financial statements
• All of the subsidiary’s revenue and costs are included line by line in
the Statement of Comprehensive Income (SOCI).
• All assets and liabilities are included line by line on the Balance Sheet.
• If there are other shareholders, their share is shown as a Non
Controlling Interest (NCI), with total profit split between Infratil
shareholders and minority shareholders at the bottom of the
primary statements.
What this means for readers
• The Group results show the full operating performance of the
business, not just Infratil’s share.
• Changes from year to year in revenue, profit and net assets are
more clearly visible.
ASSOCIATE COMPANIES – EQUITY ACCOUNTED
Where Infratil does not control a business but can still influence key
decisions, the investment is treated as an associate.
How this appears in the financial statements
• Infratil’s share of the associate’s net profit after tax (NPAT) is shown
as a single line in the SOCI.
• This includes all items at the associate level, such as financing costs,
tax and valuation movements.
• The Balance Sheet shows a single investment line, representing
Infratil’s net investment into the associate (original investment, annual
share of earnings and distributions).
• Dividends received reduce the value of the investment rather than
being shown as revenue.
What this means for readers
• The primary financial statements show limited detail about the
associate’s operations, such as revenue or expenses.
• More detail (including 100% revenue, NPAT and Other Comprehensive
Income (OCI)) is provided in note 6, Investments in associates.
INVESTMENTS MEASURED AT FAIR VALUE
Where Infratil has no control and no significant influence, the
investment is treated as a financial investment and measured at
fair value.
How this appears in the financial statements
• No operating revenue or profit from the investment is included
in NPAT.
• Changes in value are recorded in OCI rather than profit.
• The investment is shown on the Balance Sheet as a single line
at fair value, often based on a quoted market price.
• Dividends received are shown separately in the SOCI.
• Value changes are tracked in an OCI reserve, not in retained
earnings.
What this means for readers
• These investments do not contribute to operating profit, other
than dividends received.
• Performance is mainly reflected through changes in valuation,
rather than earnings.
Taken together, these accounting approaches mean that Infratil’s
financial results reflect both the performance of its infrastructure
investments and the level of ownership and control it has over each
business. Where Infratil controls or has significant influence over an
investment, results are reported based on the underlying accounting
performance of those businesses and do not generally reflect changes
in their fair value from year to year (unless the investment is impaired).
By contrast, investments measured at fair value reflect changes in
market valuation directly. As a result, book values in the financial
statements and underlying fair values may differ, and the notes provide
important additional context for understanding the Group’s overall
performance and value creation.
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Our management model
Sustainability
Our portfolio
Financial Performance
Corporate governance
Directory
32
Report of the Chief ExecutiveInfratil Annual Report
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Financial Performance
Corporate governance
Directory
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report
32
CONNECTING
IDEAS THAT
MATTER
33
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
Notes
2026
$Millions
Restated
2025
$Millions
Operating revenue10 2,999.1 2,855.8
Dividends
45.8
-
Total revenue3,044.9 2,855.8
Share of earnings of associate companies6 442.2493.7
Total income3,487.13,349.5
Depreciation14, 16(409.9)(431.3)
Amortisation of intangibles18 (170.5)(170.7)
Employee benefits(706.4)(643.1)
Operating expenses12 (1,509.4)(1,780.0)
Total operating expenditure(2,796.2)(3,025.1)
Operating surplus before financing, derivatives, realisations
and impairments690.9324.4
Net gain/(loss) on foreign exchange and derivatives16.9 (39.4)
Net realisations, revaluations and impairments11(99.3)(107.3)
Interest income5.7 36.3
Interest expense(459.0)(437.7)
Net financing expense(453.3)(401.4)
Net surplus/(loss) before taxation155.2(223.7)
Taxation credit/(expense)13 138.9(46.3)
Net surplus/(loss) for the year from continuing operations294.1(270.0)
Net surplus/(loss) from discontinued operations after tax9 280.2 0.2
Net surplus/(loss) for the year574.3(269.8)
Net surplus/(loss) attributable to owners of the Company549.8(294.8)
Net surplus/(loss) attributable to non-controlling interests24.5 25.0
The accompanying notes form part of these consolidated financial statements.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
For the year ended 31 March 2026
Notes
2026
$Millions
Restated
2025
$Millions
Other comprehensive income, after tax
Items that will not be reclassified to profit and loss:
Fair value change of property, plant and equipment 15.4 229.6
Share of associates’ other comprehensive income(46.2)29.2
Fair value change of equity investments 61.8 (1.0)
Income tax effect of the above items(5.7)(37.4)
Items that may subsequently be reclassified to profit and loss:
Differences arising on translation of foreign operations350.176.7
Effective portion of changes in fair value of cash flow hedges147.0 (170.1)
Realisations on disposal of subsidiary, reclassified to profit and loss(674.6)(3.5)
Ineffective portion of hedges taken to profit and loss3.4 (1.4)
Income tax effect of the above items(44.9)51.4
Total other comprehensive income after tax(193.7)173.5
Total comprehensive income for the year380.6(96.3)
Total comprehensive income for the year attributable to:
Owners of the Company991.7(157.7)
Non-controlling interests(611.1)61.4
Earnings per share
Basic and diluted (cents per share) from continuing operations4 27.4(31.6)
Basic and diluted (cents per share) 4 55.8(31.5)
34
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
Notes
2026
$Millions
Restated
2025
$Millions
Cash and cash equivalents22.1 312.6 293.7
Trade and other accounts receivable and prepayments22.1 499.7 425.2
Electricity market security deposits - 26.2
Derivative financial instruments22.4 6.6 80.5
Inventories44.1 42.6
Income tax receivable23.1 0.2
Assets held for sale9 179.1 140.1
Current assets1,065.2 1,008.5
Trade and other accounts receivable and prepayments22.1 128.4 120.0
Property, plant and equipment14 3,144.6 5,047.3
Investment properties15 114.0 103.1
Right of use assets16.1 1,209.2 1,130.1
Derivative financial instruments22.4 54.3 93.2
Intangible assets18 734.1 811.9
Goodwill 17 4,726.5 4,682.0
Investments in associates6 4,971.23,592.7
Shareholder loans to associates6 291.7 245.7
Deferred tax asset13.3 117.2 -
Other investments7 1,619.1 198.0
Non-current assets17,110.316,024.0
Total assets18,175.517,032.5
The accompanying notes form part of these consolidated financial statements.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION
As at 31 March 2026
Notes
2026
$Millions
Restated
2025
$Millions
Accounts payable, accruals and other liabilities834.8 862.1
Interest bearing loans and borrowings19 397.0 105.4
Deferred payments for associates6 451.8-
Lease liabilities16.2 87.5 82.7
Derivative financial instruments22.4 14.1 132.4
Income tax payable4.9 17.7
Infratil Infrastructure bonds20 156.1 161.5
Wellington International Airport bonds21 100.0 70.0
Liabilities directly associated with the assets held for sale9 - 69.1
Current liabilities2,046.21,500.9
Interest bearing loans and borrowings19 3,860.5 3,082.2
Accounts payable, accruals and other liabilities268.2 381.9
Deferred payments for associates6 139.9-
Lease liabilities16.2 1,237.7 1,086.8
Deferred tax liability13.3 - 204.4
Derivative financial instruments22.4 13.6 234.7
Infratil Infrastructure bonds20 1,204.7 1,239.7
Perpetual Infratil Infrastructure bonds20 231.9 231.9
Manawa Energy bonds - 373.4
Wellington International Airport bonds and senior notes21 643.7 615.7
Non-current liabilities7,600.27,450.7
Attributable to owners of the Company7,677.26,527.2
Non-controlling interest in subsidiaries851.9 1,553.7
Total equity8,529.18,080.9
Total equity and liabilities18,175.517,032.5
Approved on behalf of the Board on 25 May 2026
Alison Gerry Anne Urlwin
Director Director
35
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
Notes
2026
$Millions
2025
$Millions
Cash flows from operating activities
Cash was provided from:
Receipts from customers3,112.7 3,305.6
Distributions received from associates1.6 7.2
Other dividends45.7 1.4
Interest received17.4 18.1
3,177.4 3,332.3
Cash was disbursed to:
Payments to suppliers and employees(2,486.2)(2,497.4)
Interest paid(445.3)(395.9)
Taxation paid(50.9)(52.6)
(2,982.4)(2,945.9)
Net cash inflow / (outflow) from operating activities25 195.0 386.4
Cash flows from investing activities
Cash was provided from:
Proceeds from sale of associates333.2 -
Capital returned from associates - 25.9
Proceeds of shareholder and management loans11.8 1.8
Proceeds from sale of subsidiaries (net of cash sold)179.2 -
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment0.6 2.5
Proceeds from sale of investment property53.8 -
Proceeds from sale of investments - 9.1
Return of security deposits24.7 172.3
603.3 211.6
Cash was disbursed to:
Purchase of investments(707.4)(813.4)
Issue of shareholder loans(42.7)(7.6)
Lodgement of security deposits(15.8)(168.3)
Purchase of intangible assets(106.7)(140.0)
Purchase of other investments(303.6)(2.6)
Purchase of shares in subsidiaries, net of cash acquired(56.7)(10.0)
Purchase of property, plant and equipment(443.9)(458.3)
(1,676.8)(1,600.2)
Net cash inflow / (outflow) from investing activities(1,073.5)(1,388.6)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
For the year ended 31 March 2026
Notes
2026
$Millions
2025
$Millions
Cash flows from financing activities
Cash was provided from:
Proceeds from issue of shares - 1,258.8
Proceeds from issue of shares to non-controlling interests89.6 38.5
Bank borrowings2,592.8 2,034.2
Issue of bonds225.0 250.0
Lease incentives42.0 -
2,949.4 3,581.5
Cash was disbursed to:
Repayment of bank debt(1,445.9)(2,007.7)
Repayment of lease liabilities(91.3)(105.3)
Loan establishment costs(3.0)(32.1)
Repayment of bonds(211.3)(140.0)
Infrastructure bond issue expenses(1.6)(4.0)
Shares acquired from non-controlling shareholders in subsidiaries(108.7)(45.5)
Dividends paid to non-controlling shareholders in subsidiaries(56.9)(66.3)
Dividends paid to equity holders3 (138.4)(122.4)
(2,057.1)(2,523.3)
Net cash inflow / (outflow) from financing activities26892.3 1,058.2
Net increase / (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents13.8 56.0
Foreign exchange gains / (losses) on cash and cash equivalents9.6 1.5
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the year293.7 236.2
Cash balances on acquisition - -
Adjustment for cash disposed of on sale of subsidiary9(4.5) -
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the year312.6 293.7
The accompanying notes form part of these consolidated financial statements.
36
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
Capital
$Millions
Revaluation
reserve
$Millions
Foreign currency
translation reserve
$Millions
Other
reserves
$Millions
Retained
earnings
$Millions
Total attributable
to owners of the
Company
$Millions
Non-controlling
$Millions
Total
equity
$Millions
Balance as at 1 April 2025 (restated)3,409.2 763.0 150.7 32.5 2,171.8 6,527.2 1,553.7 8,080.9
Net surplus/(loss) for the year - - - - 549.8549.824.5 574.3
Other comprehensive income, after tax
Realisations on disposal of subsidiary, reclassified to profit and loss - - - - - - - -
Fair value change of property, plant & equipment - 9.7 - - - 9.7 - 9.7
Share of associates other comprehensive income - - - (46.2) - (46.2) - (46.2)
Fair value change of equity investments - - - 61.8 - 61.8 - 61.8
Differences arising on translation of foreign operations - - 352.7 - - 352.7 - 352.7
Effective portion of changes in fair value of cash flow hedges - - - 71.1 - 71.1 31.8 102.9
Items reclassified to profit and loss on disposal of subsidiaries(7.2) - - (0.7)0.7 (7.2)(667.4)(674.6)
Items reclassified to retained earnings on disposal of subsidiaries - (318.3) - - 318.3 - - -
Total other comprehensive income(7.2)(308.6)352.786.0 319.0 441.9(635.6)(193.7)
Total comprehensive income for the year(7.2)(308.6)352.786.0 868.8991.7(611.1)380.6
Contributions by and distributions to non-controlling interest
Distributions to outside equity interest in associates - - - - - - - -
Non-controlling interest arising on acquisition of subsidiary - - - - - - - -
Issue of shares to non-controlling interests - - - - - - 99.8 99.8
Issue/(acquisition) of shares held by outside equity interest - - - - (1.7)(1.7)(1.1)(2.8)
Total contributions by and distributions to non-controlling interest - - - - (1.7)(1.7)98.7 97.0
Contributions by and distributions to owners
Shares issued298.4 - - - - 298.4 - 298.4
Share buybacks - - - - - - (100.9)(100.9)
Shares issued under dividend reinvestment plan63.2 - - - - 63.2 - 63.2
Dividends to owners of the Company - - - - (201.6)(201.6)(88.5)(290.1)
Total contributions by and distributions to owners361.6 - - - (201.6)160.0 (189.4)(29.4)
Balance at 31 March 20263,763.6 454.4 503.4118.5 2,837.37,677.2851.9 8,529.1
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
For the year ended 31 March 2026
The accompanying notes form part of these consolidated financial statements.
37
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
Capital
$Millions
Revaluation
reserve
$Millions
Restated
Foreign currency
translation reserve
$Millions
Other
reserves
$Millions
Restated
Retained
earnings
$Millions
Total attributable
to owners of the
Company
$Millions
Non-controlling
$Millions
Total
equity
$Millions
Balance as at 1 April 20242,043.9 660.4 71.7 78.0 2,786.7 5,640.7 1,548.4 7,189.1
Restatement - Note 1 - - (1.0) - (140.4)(141.4) - (141.4)
Total comprehensive income for the year
Net surplus for the year (restated) - - - - (294.8)(294.8)25.0 (269.8)
Other comprehensive income, after tax
Items reclassified to profit and loss on disposal of subsidiaries - - - - - - (3.5)(3.5)
Fair value change of property, plant and equipment - 102.6 - - - 102.6 89.6 192.2
Share of associates’ other comprehensive income - - - 29.2 - 29.2 - 29.2
Fair value change of equity investments - - - (1.0) - (1.0) - (1.0)
Differences arising on translation of foreign operations - - 80.0 - - 80.0 0.5 80.5
Effective portion of changes in fair value of cash flow hedges - - - (73.7) - (73.7)(50.2)(123.9)
Total other comprehensive income - 102.6 80.0 (45.5) - 137.1 36.4 173.5
Total comprehensive income for the year - 102.6 80.0 (45.5)(294.8)(157.7)61.4 (96.3)
Contributions by and distributions to non-controlling interest
Distributions to outside equity interest in associates - - - - (0.8)(0.8) - (0.8)
Non-controlling interest arising on acquisition of subsidiary - - - - - - - -
Issue of shares to non-controlling interests - - - - - - 19.6 19.6
Issue/(acquisition) of shares held by outside equity interest - - - - - - (10.0)(10.0)
Total contributions by and distributions to non-controlling interest - - - - (0.8)(0.8)9.6 8.8
Contributions by and distributions to owners
Shares issued1,308.7 - - - - 1,308.7 - 1,308.7
Share buybacks - - - - - - - -
Shares issued under dividend reinvestment plan56.6 - - - - 56.6 - 56.6
Dividends to owners of the Company - - - - (178.9)(178.9)(65.7)(244.6)
Total contributions by and distributions to owners1,365.3 - - - (178.9)1,186.4 (65.7)1,120.7
Balance at 31 March 20253,409.2 763.0 150.7 32.5 2,171.8 6,527.2 1,553.7 8,080.9
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
For the year ended 31 March 2025
The accompanying notes form part of these consolidated financial statements.
38
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the year ended 31 March 2026
(1) ACCOUNTING POLICIES
(A) REPORTING ENTITY
Infratil Limited ('the Company') is a company domiciled in New Zealand and registered under the Companies
Act 1993. The Company is listed on the NZX Main Board ('NZX') and Australian Securities Exchange ('ASX'),
and is an FMC Reporting Entity in terms of Part 7 of the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013.
(B) BASIS OF PREPARATION
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with New Zealand Generally
Accepted Accounting Principles (‘NZ GAAP’) and comply with New Zealand equivalents to International
Financial Reporting Standards ('NZ IFRS') and other applicable financial reporting standards as appropriate
for profit-oriented entities. The consolidated financial statements comprise the Company, its subsidiaries,
associates and investments held at fair value ('the Group'). The presentation currency used in the
preparation of these consolidated financial statements is New Zealand dollars and is presented in $Millions
unless otherwise stated. The principal accounting policies adopted in the preparation of these consolidated
financial statements are set out below. These policies have been consistently applied to all the periods
presented, unless otherwise stated. Comparative figures have been restated where appropriate to ensure
consistency with the current period.
The consolidated financial statements comprise statements of the following: comprehensive income;
financial position; changes in equity; cash flows; significant accounting policies; and the notes to those
statements. The consolidated financial statements are prepared on the basis of historical cost, except
certain property, plant and equipment which is valued in accordance with accounting policy (E), investment
property valued in accordance with accounting policy (F), financial derivatives valued in accordance with
accounting policy (L) and equity investments designated at fair value through other comprehensive income
(FVOCI) (S).
The Group owns and operates infrastructure businesses and investments in New Zealand, Australia, the
United States, Asia, United Kingdom and Europe. Below is the basis of preparation for its investments across
the portfolio.
.
2026
Holding
2025
Holding Nature of InvestmentPrincipal activity
New Zealand
One NZ Capital Limited (One NZ)99.8% 99.9% Subsidiary - NZ IFRS 10Telecommunications
Infratil Finance Limited100% 100% Subsidiary - NZ IFRS 10Group Financing
Infratil Infrastructure Property
Limited
100%100%Subsidiary - NZ IFRS 10Property
Mahi Tahi Towers Limited
(Fortysouth)
20.0% 20.0% Held for Sale - NZ IFRS 5*Mobile Towers
Manawa Energy Limited - 51.1% Subsidiary - NZ IFRS 10Renewable Energy
RHCNZ Group Limited56.8% 51.7% Subsidiary - NZ IFRS 10Diagnostic Imaging
Wellington International Airport
Limited
66.0% 66.0% Subsidiary - NZ IFRS 10Airport
Contact Energy Limited14.1% - Fair Value - NZ IFRS 9Renewable Energy
Australia
CDC Group Holdings Pty Ltd49.7%48.2%Associate - NZ IAS 28Data Centres
Mint Renewables Limited73.0%73.0% Subsidiary - NZ IFRS 10Renewable Energy
Qscan Group Holdings Newco Pty59.5%57.2% Subsidiary - NZ IFRS 10Diagnostic Imaging
RA (Holdings) 2014 Pty Limited
(RetireAustralia)
- 50.0% Associate - NZ IAS 28Retirement Living
Anytime Radiology Limited59.4%- Subsidiary - NZ IFRS 10Teleradiology
Asia
Gurīn Energy Pte. Limited95.0% 95.0% Subsidiary - NZ IFRS 10Renewable Energy
United States
Clearvision Ventures
(31 December year end)Fair Value - NZ IFRS 9Venture Capital
Longroad Energy Holdings, LLC
(31 December year end)42.0% 37.0% Associate - NZ IAS 28Renewable Energy
Europe
Galileo Green Energy, GmbH38.0%38.0%Associate - NZ IAS 28Renewable Energy
United Kingdom
Kao Data Limited54.7%54.0%Associate - NZ IAS 28Data Centres
* In the prior year, Fortysouth was equity-accounted for under NZ IAS 28.
39
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
(B) BASIS OF PREPARATION CONTINUED
Accounting estimates and judgements
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with NZ IFRS requires management to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the
consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting
period. Future outcomes could differ from those estimates. The principal areas of judgement in preparing
these consolidated financial statements are set out below.
Valuation of property, plant and equipment
Where property, plant and equipment is recorded at fair value, valuations can include an assessment of the
net present value of the future earnings of the assets, the depreciated replacement cost, and other
market-based information in accordance with asset valuation standards. The key inputs and assumptions
that are used in valuations, that require judgement, can include projections of future revenues, volumes,
operational and capital expenditure profiles, capacity, terminal values, the application of discount rates and
replacement values. Key inputs and assumptions are reassessed at each balance date to ensure there has
been no material change that may impact the valuation.
With respect to assets held at cost, judgements are made about whether costs incurred relate to bringing an
asset to its working condition for its intended use, and therefore are appropriate for capitalisation as part of
the cost of the asset. The determination of the appropriate life for a particular asset requires judgements
about, among other factors, the expected future economic benefits of the asset and the likelihood of
obsolescence.
Assessing whether an asset is impaired involves estimating the future cash flows that the asset is expected
to generate. This will, in turn, involve a number of assumptions, including the assessment of the key inputs
that impact the valuation.
Valuation of investments including Associates
Infratil completes an assessment of the carrying value of investments at least annually and considers
objective evidence for impairment on each investment, taking into account observable data on the
investment, the status or context of markets, its own view of fair value, and its long term investment
intentions. Infratil notes the following matters which are specifically considered in terms of objective
evidence of impairment of its investments, and whether there is a significant or prolonged decline from
cost, which should be recorded as an impairment, and taken to profit and loss: any known loss events that
have occurred since the initial recognition date of the investments, including its investment performance,
its long term investment horizon, specific initiatives which reflect the strategic or influential nature of its
existing investment position and internal valuations; and the state of markets. The assessment also requires
judgements about the expected future performance and cash flows of the investment.
Goodwill impairment testing
Judgement is applied in identifying cash-generating units (CGUs), including assessing the lowest level at
which cash inflows are largely independent and goodwill is monitored for internal management purposes.
Judgement is also applied in determining the appropriate methodology used to estimate recoverable
amount, defined as the higher of value in use (VIU) and fair value less costs of disposal (FVLCD), depending
on the characteristics of the CGU and available observable market information. Where VIU calculations are
used, judgement is required in forecasting future cash flows and selecting appropriate discount rates and
long-term growth assumptions. Where FVLCD is used, judgement is required in determining the price that
would be received from the sale of the CGU in an orderly transaction between market participants, including
the selection of market-based assumptions for cash flows, discount rates, and growth expectations.
40
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
(C) RESTATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS IN ASSOCIATES
Longroad Energy
Longroad Energy Holdings (LEH) has three share classes (A, B, and C). The Class A shares issued at inception
to Longroad Energy Partners were previously all classified as equity. LEH management subsequently
identified that a subset of these Class A shares should have been classified as financial liabilities in the LEH
financial statements prepared under NZ IFRS. The holder of this subset of shares has the right to put them
back to LEH at their fair value on the date when the right is exercised. Accordingly, these shares are treated
as a financial liability and are measured at the present value of the redemption price that LEH may need to
pay, which represents the fair value of this subset of shares. Any subsequent changes in carrying amount
arising from remeasurement of the redemption amount are recognised in profit or loss. This was identified as
part of a further review to translate accounting policies from US GAAP to NZ IFRS for the purpose of Infratil
applying equity accounting.
This correction has therefore impacted LEH's financial results under NZ IFRS and consequently the amount
recognised by Infratil through its share of LEH's profit or loss and has led to a restatement of prior years.
The restatement impacts the Share of Earnings of Associate Companies and differences arising on
translation of foreign operations within the Statement of Comprehensive Income, and the Investment in
Associates within the Statement of Financial Position. The adjustment to share of associates other
comprehensive income is unrelated to the restatement of the Class A share. The following tables summarise
the impacts on the Group's consolidated financial statements.
(i) Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income
For the period ended31 March 2025
Previously
reportedLongroad As restated
Share of earnings of associate companies505.0 (11.3)493.7
Taxation expense(49.1)2.8 (46.3)
Others(717.2)-(717.2)
Net surplus/(loss) for the period(261.3)(8.5)(269.8)
Share of associates other comprehensive income6.5 22.7 29.2
Differences arising on translation of foreign operations83.6 (6.9)76.7
Others67.6 -67.6
Total other comprehensive income after tax157.7 15.8 173.5
Total comprehensive income for the period(103.6)7.3 (96.3)
Earnings per share
Basic and diluted (cents per share) from continuing operations(30.6)(1.0)(31.6)
Basic and diluted (cents per share)(30.6)(0.9)(31.5)
(ii) Consolidated Statement of Financial Position
For the period ended31 March 2025
Previously
reportedLongroad As restated
Investments in associates3,803.1 (210.4)3,592.7
Others13,439.8 -13,439.8
Total assets17,242.9 (210.4)17,032.5
Deferred tax liability(280.7)76.3 (204.4)
Others(8,747.2)-(8,747.2)
Total liabilities(9,027.9)76.3 (8,951.6)
Foreign currency translation reserve(158.6)7.9 (150.7)
Other reserves(9.8)(22.7)(32.5)
Retained earnings(2,320.7)148.9 (2,171.8)
Other equity(5,725.9)-(5,725.9)
Total equity(8,215.0)134.1(8,080.9)
For the comparative period opening 1 April 2024
Previously
reportedLongroad As restated
Investments in associates2,519.3 (211.5)2,307.8
Others13,204.9 -13,204.9
Total assets15,724.2 (211.5)15,512.7
Deferred tax liability(324.6)70.1 (254.5)
Others(8,210.5)-(8,210.5)
Total liabilities(8,535.1)70.1 (8,465.0)
Foreign currency translation reserve(71.7)1.0 (70.7)
Other reserves(78.0)-(78.0)
Retained earnings(2,786.7)140.4 (2,646.3)
Other equity(4,252.7)-(4,252.7)
Total equity(7,189.1)141.4 (7,047.7)
41
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
(D) BASIS OF PREPARING CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Principles of consolidation
The consolidated financial statements are prepared by combining the financial statements of all the entities
that comprise the consolidated Group. A list of significant subsidiaries and associates is shown in Note 1.
Consistent accounting policies are employed in the preparation and presentation of the Group consolidated
financial statements.
(E) PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
Property, plant and equipment (‘PPE’) is recorded at cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment
losses, or at fair value less accumulated depreciation and impairment losses. PPE that is revalued, is revalued
to its fair value determined by an independent valuer or by management with reference to independent
experts, in accordance with NZ IAS 16 Property, Plant and Equipment. Where the assets are of a specialised
nature and do not have observable market values in their existing use, depreciated replacement cost is used
as the basis of the valuation. Depreciated replacement cost measures net current value as the most
efficient, lowest cost which would replace existing assets and offer the same amount of utility in their
present use. For non-specialised assets where there is no observable market an income-based approach is
used.
Depreciation is provided on a straight line basis and the major depreciation periods (in years) are:
Buildings and civil works2-120
Vehicles and plant and equipment1-40
Renewable generation12-200
Office and IT equipment2-5
Leasehold improvements4-40
Land not depreciated
Capital work in progress not depreciated until asset in use
Communication and network equipment1-35
(F) INVESTMENT PROPERTIES
Investment properties are property (either owned or leased) held to earn rental income. Investment
properties are measured at fair value with any change therein recognised in profit or loss. Property that
is being constructed for future use as investment property is measured at fair value and classified as
investment properties. Where a leased property is held to earn rental income, the right of use asset is
included within Investment properties.
(G) RECEIVABLES
Receivables are initially recognised at fair value and subsequently measured at amortised cost, less any
provision for expected credit losses. The Group applies the simplified approach to measuring expected
credit losses using a lifetime expected loss allowance for all trade receivables and contract assets. These
provisions take into account known commercial factors impacting specific customer accounts, as well as
the overall profile of the debtor portfolio. In assessing the provision, factors such as past collection history,
the age of receivable balances, the level of activity in customer accounts, as well as general macro-
economic trends, are also taken into account.
(H) INVESTMENTS IN ASSOCIATES
Associates are those entities in which the Group has significant influence, but not control, over the financial
and operating policies. Investments in associates are accounted for using the equity method. Under the
equity method, the investment in the associate is carried at cost plus the Group’s share of post-acquisition
changes in the net assets of the associate and any impairment losses. The Group's share of the associates’
post-acquisition profits or losses is recognised in profit or loss, and the Group’s share of post-acquisition
movements in reserves is recognised in other comprehensive income.
(I) GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Goodwill
The carrying value of goodwill is subject to an annual impairment test to ensure the carrying value does
not exceed the recoverable amount at balance date. For the purpose of impairment testing, goodwill is
allocated to the individual cash-generating units to which it relates. Any impairment losses are recognised
in the statement of comprehensive income. In determining the recoverable amount of goodwill, fair value
is assessed, including the use of valuation models to calculate the present value of expected future cash
flows of the cash-generating units, and where available with reference to listed prices.
Intangible assets
Intangible assets include software, customer contracts, radio spectrum licences, fibre capacity agreements
and brands.
Amortisation is calculated to write off the cost of intangible assets less their estimated residual values using
the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives, and is generally recognised in profit or loss.
The estimated useful lives for current and comparative periods are as follows:
Software3 - 7 years
Customer contracts1 - 10 years
Radio spectrum licences15 - 20 years
Fibre capacity agreements15 - 20 years
Indefeasible rights of use25 years
Amortisation methods, useful lives and residual values are reviewed at each reporting date and adjusted
if appropriate.
42
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
Brand names
Brand names that are acquired as part of a business combination are recognised separately from goodwill
and included in intangible assets. These assets are carried at their fair value at the date of acquisition less
impairment losses. Brand names are valued using the relief from royalty method. Brand names are
determined to have indefinite useful lives and therefore do not attract amortisation. Key factors taken into
account in concluding this was the ongoing strong recognition of the brands, and the absence of any legal,
technical or commercial factors indicating that a finite life would be more appropriate. However, some
brands have definite useful lives and are amortised accordingly to their estimated useful life.
The carrying value of a brand is subject to an annual impairment test (with goodwill) to ensure the carrying
value does not exceed the recoverable amount at balance date.
(J) ASSETS AND DISPOSAL GROUPS HELD FOR SALE
Assets and disposal groups classified as held for sale are measured at the lower of carrying amount or fair
value less costs to sell. Assets and disposal groups are classified as held for sale if their carrying amount will
be recovered through a sale transaction rather than through continuing use. This condition is regarded as
met only when the sale is highly probable and the asset (or disposal group) is available for immediate sale in
its present condition and the sale of the asset (or disposal group) is expected to be completed within one
year from the date of classification.
(K) TAXATION
Income tax comprises both current and deferred tax. Current tax is the expected tax payable on the taxable
income for the year, using tax rates enacted or substantively enacted at the balance date, and any
adjustment to tax payable in respect of previous years. Deferred tax is recognised in respect of the
differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the
carrying amounts used for taxation purposes.
The amount of deferred tax provided is based on the expected manner of realisation or settlement of the
carrying amount of assets and liabilities, using tax rates enacted or substantively enacted at the balance
sheet date. A deferred tax asset is recognised only to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profits
will be available against which the asset can be utilised, or there are deferred tax liabilities to offset it.
Preparation of the consolidated financial statements requires estimates of the amount of tax that will
ultimately be payable, the availability and recognition of losses to be carried forward and the amount of
foreign tax credits that will be received.
(L) DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
When appropriate, the Group enters into agreements to manage its interest rate, foreign exchange,
operating and investment risks.
In accordance with the Group's risk management policies, the Group does not hold or issue derivative
financial instruments for speculative purposes. However, certain derivatives do not qualify for hedge
accounting and are required to be accounted for at fair value through profit or loss. Derivative financial
instruments are recognised initially at fair value at the date they are entered into. Subsequent to initial
recognition, derivative financial instruments are stated at fair value at each balance sheet date. The resulting
gain or loss is recognised in the profit or loss immediately unless the derivative is designated effective as a
hedging instrument, in which event, recognition of any resultant gain or loss depends on the nature of
the hedging relationship. The Group identifies certain derivatives as hedges of highly probable forecast
transactions to the extent the hedge meets the hedge designation tests.
Hedge accounting
The Group designates certain hedging instruments as either cash flow hedges or hedges of net investments
in equity. At the inception of the hedge relationship the Group documents the relationship between the
hedging instrument and hedged item, along with its risk management objectives and its strategy for
undertaking various hedge transactions. Furthermore, at the inception of the hedge and on an on-going
basis, the Group documents whether the hedging instrument that is used in the hedging relationship is
highly effective in offsetting changes in fair values or cash flows of the hedged item.
The effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives that are designated and qualify as cash flow
hedges are recognised in other comprehensive income and presented in equity. The gain or loss relating to
the ineffective portion is recognised in profit or loss. The amounts presented in equity are recognised in profit
or loss in the periods when the hedged item is recognised in profit or loss.
Hedge accounting is discontinued when the Group revokes the hedging relationship, the hedging instrument
expires or is sold, terminated, or exercised, or no longer qualifies for hedge accounting. Any cumulative gain
or loss recognised in equity at that time remains in equity and is recognised when the forecast transaction is
ultimately recognised in profit or loss. When a forecast transaction is no longer expected to occur, the
cumulative gain or loss that was recognised in equity is recognised in profit or loss.
Foreign currency differences arising on the retranslation of a financial liability designated as a hedge of a net
investment in a foreign operation are recognised directly in equity, in the foreign currency translation reserve,
to the extent that the hedge is effective. To the extent that the hedge is ineffective, such differences are
recognised in profit or loss. When the hedged net investment is disposed of, the cumulative amount in equity
is transferred to profit or loss as an adjustment to the profit or loss on disposal.
(M) FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSACTIONS
Transactions in foreign currencies are translated to the respective functional currencies of Group entities
at exchange rates at the dates of the transactions. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign
currencies at the reporting date are translated to the functional currency at the exchange rate at that date.
The foreign currency gain or loss on monetary items is the difference between amortised cost in the
functional currency at the beginning of the period, adjusted for interest and payments during the period,
and the amortised cost in foreign currency translated at the exchange rate at the end of the period.
Non-monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies that are measured at fair value are
translated to the functional currency at the exchange rate at the date that the fair value was determined.
Foreign currency differences arising on translation are recognised in profit or loss, except for differences
arising on the translation of the net investment in a foreign operation.
Foreign operations
The assets and liabilities of foreign operations including goodwill and fair value adjustments arising on
acquisition, are translated to New Zealand dollars at exchange rates at the reporting date. The income
and expenses of foreign operations are translated to New Zealand dollars at the average rate for the
reporting period.
43
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
(N) IMPAIRMENT OF ASSETS
At each reporting date, the Group reviews the carrying amounts of its assets to determine whether there
is any indication that those assets have suffered an impairment loss. If any such indication exists, the
recoverable amount of the asset is estimated in order to determine the extent of the impairment loss (if any).
Where the asset does not generate cash flows that are independent from other assets, the Group estimates
the recoverable amount of the cash-generating unit to which the asset belongs. Goodwill, intangible assets
with indefinite useful lives and intangible assets not yet available for use are tested for impairment annually
and whenever there is an indication that the asset may be impaired.
(O) REVENUE RECOGNITION
Revenue is measured based on the consideration specified in a contract with a customer. A description of
the nature and timing of the various performance obligations in the Group’s contracts with customers and
when revenue is recognised is outlined at Note 10.
Interest revenues are recognised as accrued, taking into account the effective yield of the financial asset.
Revenue from services is recognised in the profit or loss over the period of service. Dividend income is
recognised when the right to receive the payment is established.
(P) BORROWINGS
Borrowings are recorded initially at fair value, net of transaction costs. Subsequent to initial recognition,
borrowings are measured at amortised cost with any difference between the initial recognised amount and
the redemption value being recognised in profit or loss over the period of the borrowing using the effective
interest rate. Bond and bank debt issue expenses, fees and other costs incurred in arranging finance are
capitalised and amortised over the term of the relevant debt instrument or debt facility.
(Q) DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
Classification as a discontinued operation occurs on disposal, or when the operation meets the criteria to
be classified as a non-current asset or disposal group held for sale (see paragraph (J)), and represents a
separate major line of business or geographical area of operations. When an operation is classified as a
discontinued operation, the comparative statement of comprehensive income is re-presented as if the
operation had been discontinued from the start of the comparative year.
(R) SEGMENT REPORTING
An operating segment is a component of the Group that engages in business activities from which it may
earn revenues and incur expenses, including revenues and expenses that relate to transactions with any
of the Group's other components. All operating segments' operating results are reviewed regularly by the
Group's Board of Directors to make decisions about resources to be allocated to the segment and assess
its performance, and for which discrete financial information is available.
The Group is organised into ten main business segments, Manawa Energy (sold during the period), Mint
Renewables, Wellington International Airport, Qscan Group, RHCNZ Medical Imaging, Anytime Radiology
Group, Gurīn Energy, One NZ, Associate Companies and Other. Other comprises investment activity not
included in the specific categories.
(S) EQUITY INVESTMENTS DESIGNATED AT FAIR VALUE THROUGH OTHER
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (FVOCI)
Equity investments are those investments that meet the definition of equity instruments under NZ IFRS 9
and over which the Group does not have control or significant influence. Equity investments that are not held
for trading may be irrevocably designated at fair value through other comprehensive income (FVOCI) at
initial recognition.
Equity investments designated at FVOCI are measured at fair value at each reporting date. Changes in fair
value are recognised in other comprehensive income. Dividends received from these investments are
recognised in profit or loss when the Group’s right to receive payment is established. Amounts recognised in
other comprehensive income in respect of equity investments designated at FVOCI are not reclassified to
profit or loss on derecognition. Instead, the cumulative gain or loss is transferred directly within equity.
(T) COMMON CONTROL TRANSACTIONS
Business combinations and transfers of businesses between entities that are ultimately controlled by the
Group both before and after the transaction are considered common control transactions and are outside
the scope of NZ IFRS 3 Business Combinations. The Group accounts for such transactions in accordance
with NZ IAS 8, applying an approach that reflects the continuation of control rather than a change in
ownership.
The Group applies predecessor (book value) accounting to common control transactions in its consolidated
financial statements. The assets and liabilities transferred are recognised at their existing carrying amounts,
and no goodwill or fair value uplift is recognised. Comparative information is not restated, as the Group
already controls both parties to the transaction and there is no change in the consolidated economic
substance of the Group.
(U) NEW STANDARDS, AMENDMENTS AND PRONOUNCEMENTS NOT YET ADOPTED
BY THE GROUP
NZ IFRS 18 - Presentation and Disclosure in Financial Statements is effective for periods beginning on or
after 1 January 2027 and applies retrospectively. The new standard aims to provide greater consistency in
presentation of the income and cash flow statements, and more disaggregated information. This is expected
to result in significant changes to how the Group presents the income statement and what information will
need to be disclosed on management-defined performance measures.
(2) NATURE OF BUSINESS
The Group owns and operates infrastructure businesses and investments in New Zealand, Australia,
the United States, Asia, United Kingdom and Europe. The Company is a limited liability company
incorporated and domiciled in New Zealand. The address of its registered office is 5 Market Lane,
Wellington, New Zealand.
More information on the individual businesses is contained in Note 5 (Operating segments) and Note 6
(Investments in associates) including the relative contributions to total revenue and expenses of the Group.
44
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
(3) INFRATIL SHARES AND DIVIDENDS
Ordinary shares (fully paid)20262025
Total authorised and issued shares at the beginning of the year968,086,132 832,567,631
Movements during the year:
New shares issued25,347,575 130,322,236
New shares issued under dividend reinvestment plan5,878,763 5,196,265
Treasury stock reissued under dividend reinvestment plan - -
Share buyback - -
Total authorised and issued shares at the end of the year 999,312,470 968,086,132
The Group’s capital comprises share capital, reserves, retained earnings and non-controlling interests.
All fully paid ordinary shares carry the same voting rights and rank equally for dividends and distributions
of equity.
On 28 May 2025, Infratil issued 7.7 million new shares to Morrison to settle $80.0 million of incentive fees for
management services. On 20 October 2025, Infratil also issued 17.6 million new shares as part payment for
the acquisition of 48.9 million Contact Energy shares from TECT Holdings Limited.
From time to time, the Company may purchase its own shares on market where this is considered to be in
shareholders’ interests and permitted under applicable trading windows. Shares purchased may be held
as treasury stock, reissued under the Dividend Reinvestment Plan, or cancelled. During the year, the Group
issued 5,878,763 shares under the Dividend Reinvestment Plan. At 31 March 2026, the Group held
1,662,617 shares as treasury stock, unchanged from 31 March 2025.
Dividends paid on ordinary shares
2026
cents per
share
2025
cents per
share
2026
$Millions
2025
$Millions
Final dividend prior year
13.25 13.00 129.3 108.8
Interim dividend current year7.25 7.25 72.3 70.1
Dividends paid to owners of the Company20.50 20.25 201.6 178.9
(4) EARNINGS PER SHARE
2026
$Millions
Restated
2025
$Millions
Net surplus/(loss) from continuing operations attributable to
ordinary shareholders
269.6(295.0)
Basic and diluted earnings per share (cps) from continuing
operations
27.4(31.6)
Net surplus/(loss) attributable to ordinary shareholders
549.8(294.8)
Basic and diluted earnings per share (cps)
55.8(31.5)
Weighted average number of ordinary shares
Issued ordinary shares at 1 April
968.1 832.6
Effect of new shares issued
14.1 99.5
Effect of new shares issued under dividend reinvestment plan
3.4 3.2
Effect of Treasury stock reissued under dividend reinvestment plan
- -
Effect of shares bought back - -
Weighted average number of ordinary shares at end of year 985.6 935.3
(5) OPERATING SEGMENTS
Gurīn Energy, Manawa Energy and Mint Renewables are renewable generation investments, Wellington
International Airport is an airport investment, Qscan Group, RHCNZ Medical Imaging and Anytime Radiology
Group are diagnostic imaging investments, and One NZ is a digital infrastructure investment. Infratil accounts
for these companies as subsidiaries. Associates comprises Infratil's investments that are not consolidated for
financial reporting purposes including CDC Data Centres, Fortysouth, Galileo, Kao Data, Longroad Energy and
RetireAustralia. Further information on these investments is outlined in Note 6. During the period, Infratil
disposed of Manawa Energy and RetireAustralia as outlined in Note 9. All other segments and corporate
predominately includes the activities of the Parent Company. The group has no significant reliance on any
one customer. Inter-segment revenue primarily comprises dividends from portfolio companies to the Parent
Company.
The Group operates in two principal areas, New Zealand and Australia, as well as having investments in the
United States, the United Kingdom, Asia and Europe. The Group’s geographical segments are based on the
location of both customers and assets.
45
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
For the year ended 31 March 2026
Gurīn
Energy
Asia
$Millions
Manawa
Energy
New Zealand
$Millions
Mint
Renewables
Australia
$Millions
Wellington
International
Airport
New Zealand
$Millions
Qscan
Group
Australia
$Millions
RHCNZ
Medical
Imaging
New Zealand
$Millions
Anytime
Radiology
Group
Australia
$Millions
One NZ
New Zealand
$Millions
Associates
$Millions
All other
segments and
corporate
New Zealand
$Millions
Eliminations &
discontinued
operations
$Millions
Total
$Millions
Total revenue10.7 125.5 0.2 194.2 399.7 373.2 16.3 1,998.7 - 87.1 (160.7)3,044.9
Share of earnings of associate companies - - - - - - - - 442.2 - - 442.2
Inter-segment revenue - - - - - - - - - 55.5 (55.5) -
Total income10.7 125.5 0.2 194.2 399.7 373.2 16.3 1,998.7 442.2 142.6 (216.2)3,487.1
Depreciation(3.4)(5.6)(0.5)(34.9)(38.8)(32.3)(0.1)(299.9) - - 5.6 (409.9)
Amortisation of intangibles - (0.2) - - (0.7)(2.5)(0.1)(167.2) - - 0.2 (170.5)
Employee benefits(25.2)(12.9)(6.6)(17.2)(216.5)(184.7)(2.9)(254.6) - - 14.2 (706.4)
Operating expenses(17.7)(105.7)(14.0)(99.1)(99.0)(70.0)(20.3)(1,162.1) - (113.9)192.4 (1,509.4)
Total operating expenditure(46.3)(124.4)(21.1)(151.2)(355.0)(289.5)(23.4)(1,883.8) - (113.9)212.4 (2,796.2)
Operating surplus before financing, derivatives, realisations
and impairments(35.6)1.1 (20.9)43.0 44.7 83.7 (7.1)114.9 442.2 28.7 (3.8)690.9
Net gain/(loss) on foreign exchange and derivatives(0.4)23.1 - (0.6)(0.4)5.3 1.4 - - 18.1 (29.6)16.9
Net realisations, revaluations and impairments(0.2) - 0.3 6.6 52.9 31.2 - (4.0) - (109.5)(76.6)(99.3)
Interest income1.5 - 0.2 0.9 2.9 1.2 -(4.3) - 22.6 (19.3)5.7
Interest expense(6.8)(6.8) - (37.7)(37.4)(53.1)(1.1)(190.4) - (151.8)26.1 (459.0)
Net financing expense(5.3)(6.8)0.2 (36.8)(34.5)(51.9)(1.1)(194.7) - (129.2)6.8 (453.3)
Net surplus/(loss) before taxation(41.5)17.4 (20.4)12.2 62.7 68.3 (6.8)(83.8)442.2 (191.9)(103.2)155.2
Taxation credit/(expense)(1.0)(9.8) - 3.5 (20.4)(11.1)2.0 41.3 - 124.6 9.8 138.9
Net surplus/(loss) for the year(42.5)7.6 (20.4)15.7 42.3 57.2 (4.8)(42.5)442.2 (67.3)(93.4)294.1
Net surplus/(loss) attributable to owners of the company(39.4)2.4 (14.7)(8.5)48.5 45.9 (3.5)(42.6)442.2 (67.3)(88.2)274.8
Net surplus/(loss) attributable to non-controlling interests(3.1)5.2 (5.7)24.2 (6.2)11.3 (1.3)0.1 - - (5.2)19.3
Current assets58.3 - 4.3 65.4 154.3 65.9 23.5 360.8 - 349.0 (16.3)1,065.2
Non-current assets232.0 - 2.9 1,954.5 1,028.9 1,469.2 1.6 5,332.0 5,262.8 1,829.0 (2.6)17,110.3
Current liabilities66.0 - 3.7 154.3 213.4 43.9 51.5 715.5 - 948.8 (150.9)2,046.2
Non-current liabilities124.0 - 0.1 950.5 522.4 627.7 (2.0)2,634.4 - 2,587.6 155.5 7,600.2
Net assets100.3 - 3.4 915.1 447.4 863.5 (24.4)2,342.9 5,262.8 (1,358.4)(23.5)8,529.1
Net debt33.6 - (3.2)822.9 299.7 425.1 22.3 1,487.2 - 3,193.7 - 6,281.3
Non-controlling interest percentage 5.0% - 27.0% 34.0% 40.5%
43.2% 40.6% 0.2% - - -
Capital expenditure and investments71.8 9.8 0.4 111.6 31.2 46.8 - 245.7 843.0 9.3 - 1,369.6
OPERATING SEGMENTS
46
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
For the year ended 31 March 2025
Gurīn
Energy
Asia
$Millions
Manawa
Energy
New Zealand
$Millions
Mint
Renewables
Australia
$Millions
Wellington
International
Airport
New Zealand
$Millions
Qscan
Group
Australia
$Millions
RHCNZ
Medical
Imaging
New Zealand
$Millions
Anytime
Radiology
Group
Australia
$Millions
One NZ
New Zealand
$Millions
Restated
Associates
$Millions
All other
segments and
corporate
New Zealand
$Millions
Eliminations &
discontinued
operations
$Millions
Total
$Millions
Total revenue 5.9 491.0 0.3 185.3 345.6 369.9 -1,924.5 - 154.6 (523.4)2,953.7
Share of earnings of associate companies - - - - - - - - 493.7 - - 493.7
Inter-segment revenue - - - - - - - - - (97.9) - (97.9)
Total income5.9 491.0 0.3 185.3 345.6 369.9 -1,924.5 493.7 56.7 (523.4) 3,349.5
Depreciation(0.7)(21.7)(0.4)(29.9)(36.1)(26.0)-(338.2) - - 21.7 (431.3)
Amortisation of intangibles - (1.2) - - (0.4)(2.5)-(167.8) - - 1.2 (170.7)
Employee benefits(22.0)(38.8)(5.7)(15.9)(171.3)(173.6)-(254.2) - (0.4)38.8 (643.1)
Operating expenses(17.7)(368.0)(8.1)(77.9)(89.8)(70.3)-(1,071.8) - (385.2)308.8 (1,780.0)
Total operating expenditure(40.4)(429.7)(14.2)(123.7)(297.6)(272.4)-(1,832.0) - (385.6)370.5 (3,025.1)
Operating surplus before financing, derivatives, realisations
and impairments(34.5)61.3 (13.9)61.6 48.0 97.5 -92.5 493.7 (328.9)(152.9)324.4
Net gain/(loss) on foreign exchange and derivatives 1.1 (30.0) - 0.2 (0.7)(10.4)- - - (159.8)160.2 (39.4)
Net realisations, revaluations and impairments(0.1)(3.6) - (0.9) 5.3 (0.1)-(1.3) - (110.2)3.6 (107.3)
Interest income - 1.8 0.2 2.5 2.7 2.2 -18.1 - 10.7 (1.9)36.3
Interest expense(1.7)(29.2) - (35.6)(32.7)(46.9)-(228.4) - (124.6)61.4 (437.7)
Net financing expense(1.7)(27.4)0.2 (33.1)(30.0)(44.7)-(210.3)-(113.9)59.5 (401.4)
Net surplus/(loss) before taxation(35.2)0.3 (13.7)27.8 22.6 42.3 -(119.1)493.7 (712.8)70.4 (223.7)
Taxation credit/(expense)(0.6)(0.1) - (1.9)(6.3)(12.2)-30.8 - (56.1)0.1 (46.3)
Net surplus/(loss) for the year(35.8)0.2 (13.7)25.9 16.3 30.1 -(88.3)493.7 (768.9)70.5 (270.0)
Net surplus/(loss) attributable to owners of the company(33.2)(0.4)(9.9)17.1 9.3 15.3 -(88.5)493.7 (768.9)71.1 (294.4)
Net surplus/(loss) attributable to non-controlling interests(2.6)0.6 (3.8)8.8 7.0 14.8 -0.2 - - (0.6)24.4
Current assets 51.7 156.6 3.8 57.5 80.2 46.2 -373.3 - 239.2 - 1,008.5
Non-current assets 151.7 2,140.8 2.6 1,839.7 924.1 1,486.1 -5,038.1 3,838.3 247.7 354.9 16,024.0
Current liabilities 58.7 173.1 2.6 185.1 83.0 72.4 -517.6 - 45.0 363.4 1,500.9
Non-current liabilities 78.3 885.1 0.3 811.9 460.0 569.6 -2,519.6 - 2,296.2 (170.3)7,450.7
Net assets66.4 1,239.2 3.5 900.2 461.3 890.3 -2,374.2 3,838.3 (1,854.3)161.8 8,080.9
Net debt 21.6 501.1 (3.2)732.7 301.9 427.5 -1,428.7 - 2,175.8 - 5,586.1
Non-controlling interest percentage 5.0% 48.9% 27.0% 34.0%
42.8% 48.3% - 0.1% ----
Capital expenditure and investments 42.3 51.8 0.7 117.4 23.0 48.8 -269.6 791.0 8.7 - 1,353.3
OPERATING SEGMENTS
47
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
For the year ended 31 March 2026
New Zealand
$Millions
Australia
$Millions
Asia
$Millions
United States
$Millions
United Kingdom
& Europe
$Millions
Eliminations &
discontinued
operations
$Millions
Total
$Millions
Total revenue2,778.7 416.2 10.7 - - (160.7)3,044.9
Share of earnings of associate companies(7.8)762.7 - (205.7)(107.0) - 442.2
Inter-segment revenue55.5 - - - - (55.5) -
Total income2,826.4 1,178.9 10.7 (205.7)(107.0)(216.2)3,487.1
Depreciation(372.7)(39.4)(3.4) - - 5.6 (409.9)
Amortisation of intangibles(169.9)(0.8) - - - 0.2 (170.5)
Employee benefits(469.4)(226.0)(25.2) - - 14.2 (706.4)
Operating expenses(1,550.7)(133.4)(17.7) - - 192.4 (1,509.4)
Total operating expenditure(2,562.7)(399.6)(46.3) - - 212.4 (2,796.2)
Operating surplus before financing, derivatives, realisations and impairments263.7 779.3 (35.6)(205.7)(107.0)(3.8)690.9
Net gain/(loss) on foreign exchange and derivatives45.9 1.0 (0.4) - - (29.6)16.9
Net realisations, revaluations and impairments(75.7)53.2 (0.2) - - (76.6)(99.3)
Interest income20.4 3.11.5 - - (19.3)5.7
Interest expense(439.8)(38.5)(6.8) - - 26.1 (459.0)
Net financing expense(419.4)(35.4)(5.3) - - 6.8 (453.3)
Net surplus/(loss) before taxation(185.5)798.1 (41.5)(205.7)(107.0)(103.2)155.2
Taxation credit/(expense)148.5 (18.4)(1.0) - - 9.8 138.9
Net surplus/(loss) for the year(37.0)779.7 (42.5)(205.7)(107.0)(93.4)294.1
Current assets841.1 182.1 58.3 - - (16.3)1,065.2
Non-current assets10,393.1 5,006.0 232.0 771.9 709.8 (2.5)17,110.3
Current liabilities1,862.5 268.6 66.0 - - (150.9)2,046.2
Non-current liabilities6,800.2 520.5 124.0 - - 155.5 7,600.2
Net assets2,571.5 4,399.0 100.3 771.9 709.8 (23.4)8,529.1
Net debt5,928.9 318.8 33.6 - - - 6,281.3
Capital expenditure and investments413.8 588.7 71.8 177.9 117.4 - 1,369.6
OPERATING SEGMENTS - GEOGRAPHICAL
48
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
For the year ended 31 March 2025
Restated
New Zealand
$Millions
Australia
$Millions
Asia
$Millions
Restated
United States
$Millions
United Kingdom
& Europe
$Millions
Eliminations &
discontinued
operations
$Millions
Total
$Millions
Total revenue3,125.3 345.8 5.9 - - (523.3)2,953.7
Share of earnings of associate companies(7.1)548.9 - (30.1)(18.0) - 493.7
Inter-segment revenue(97.9) - - - - - (97.9)
Total income3,020.3 894.7 5.9 (30.1)(18.0)(523.3)3,349.5
Depreciation(415.8)(36.4)(0.7) - - 21.6 (431.3)
Amortisation of intangibles(171.4)(0.5) - - - 1.2 (170.7)
Employee benefits(482.9)(177.0)(22.0) - - 38.8 (643.1)
Operating expenses(1,973.3)(97.9)(17.7) - - 308.9 (1,780.0)
Total operating expenditure(3,043.4)(311.8)(40.4) - - 370.5 (3,025.1)
Operating surplus before financing, derivatives, realisations and impairments(23.1)582.9 (34.5)(30.1)(18.0)(152.8)324.4
Net gain/(loss) on foreign exchange and derivatives(200.1)(0.7)1.1 - - 160.3 (39.4)
Net realisations, revaluations and impairments(30.2)(80.6)(0.1) - - 3.6 (107.3)
Interest income35.2 2.9 - - - (1.8)36.3
Interest expense(464.7)(32.7)(1.7) - - 61.4 (437.7)
Net financing expense(429.5)(29.8)(1.7) - - 59.6 (401.4)
Net surplus/(loss) before taxation(682.9)471.8 (35.2)(30.1)(18.0)70.7 (223.7)
Taxation credit/(expense)(39.5)(6.3)(0.6) - - 0.1 (46.3)
Net surplus/(loss) for the year(722.4)465.5 (35.8)(30.1)(18.0)70.8 (270.0)
Current assets872.8 84.0 51.7 - - - 1,008.5
Non-current assets 10,804.1 3,733.6 151.7 320.6 680.6 333.4 16,024.0
Current liabilities 993.0 85.8 58.7 - - 363.4 1,500.9
Non-current liabilities7,082.2 460.5 78.3 - - (170.3)7,450.7
Net assets3,601.7 3,271.3 66.4 320.6 680.6 140.3 8,080.9
Net debt5,265.8 298.7 21.6 - - - 5,586.1
Capital expenditure and investments487.6 517.9 42.3 177.3 128.2 - 1,353.3
OPERATING SEGMENTS - GEOGRAPHICAL
49
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
(6) INVESTMENTS IN ASSOCIATES
Associates are those entities in which the Group has significant influence, but not control, over the financial
and operating policies. The Group’s investments in associates are made through a combination of equity,
and in certain instances shareholder loans to those entities.
Notes
2026
$Millions
Restated
2025
$Millions
Investments in associates are as follows:
Equity investments in associates4,971.23,592.7
Shareholder loans to associates291.7 245.7
Investments in associates5,262.93,838.4
Investments in associates are as follows:
CDC Data Centres6.13,972.6 2,402.6
RetireAustralia6.2 - 404.3
Longroad Energy 6.3580.5164.4
Kao Data6.4556.9 537.4
Galileo6.5152.9 143.4
Fortysouth6.6 - 186.3
Investments in associates5,262.93,838.4
Share of earnings of associate companies
are as follows:
CDC Data Centres6.1756.4 494.8
RetireAustralia6.26.3 54.1
Longroad Energy 6.3(205.7)(30.1)
Kao Data6.4(57.2)(10.0)
Galileo6.5(49.8)(8.0)
Fortysouth6.6(7.8)(7.1)
Share of earnings of associate companies442.2493.7
DEFERRED PAYMENTS FOR ASSOCIATES
The Group’s US$338 million capital commitment to Longroad is recognised as a financial liability. This
reflects that, upon execution of the agreement, the Group became unconditionally obligated to subscribe
for the full amount and received the associated shares at that time, with settlement structured to occur in
instalments. Accordingly, the arrangement represents a present obligation to deliver cash under NZ IAS 32,
rather than a commitment recognised as capital is called.
50
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
(6.1) CDC DATA CENTRES
CDC Data Centres ('CDC') is an owner, operator and developer of data centres, with operations in Canberra,
Sydney, Auckland and Melbourne. Infratil holds a 49.72% shareholding (31 March 2025: 48.17%) in CDC Group
Holdings Pty Ltd (the ultimate parent company of CDC Data Centres), alongside investment partners the
Commonwealth Superannuation Corporation (12.04%), Future Fund (34.53%) and CDC Data Centres
management (3.71%).
Infratil recognises its share of the associate's profit or loss based on its percentage holding of the shares
classified as equity under NZ IFRS. This may differ to the economic shareholding when certain shares are
classified as financial liabilities rather than equity under NZ IFRS.
Movement in the carrying amount of the Group’s
investment in CDC:
2026
$Millions
2025
$Millions
Carrying value at 1 April
2,402.6 1,416.4
Capital contributions557.0 494.2
Shareholder loans5.4 -
Capitalised transaction costs - 0.1
Total capital contributions during the year562.4 494.3
Interest on shareholder loan (including accruals)7.6 7.2
Share of associate’s surplus/(loss) before income tax1,184.6 757.2
Share of associate’s income tax (expense)(435.8)(281.5)
add: share of associate’s share capital issue, net of dilution
- 11.9
Total share of associate’s earnings during the year756.4 494.8
Share of associate’s other comprehensive income(18.2)(5.2)
less: Distributions received - -
less: Shareholder loan repayments including interest(9.9)(24.5)
less: WHT on shareholder loans(0.1)(1.1)
FX movements recognised in other comprehensive income279.427.9
Carrying value of investment in associate3,972.62,402.6
Summary financial information
2026
A$Millions
2025
A$Millions
Summary information for CDC is not adjusted for the percentage
ownership held by the Group (unless stated)
Current assets
479.2 238.3
Non-current assets
14,033.9 10,014.7
Total assets14,513.1 10,253.0
Current liabilities
856.3 1,245.9
Non-current liabilities
7,849.2 4,956.9
Total liabilities8,705.5 6,202.8
Net assets (100%)5,807.6 4,050.2
Group’s share of net assets2,999.1 2,025.1
Revenues
765.8 533.6
Net surplus/(loss) after tax
1,261.0 888.8
Total other comprehensive income
(32.3)(9.5)
2026
$Millions
2025
$Millions
Reconciliation of the Group’s investment in CDC:
Group’s share of net assets in NZD
3,594.5 2,224.2
Goodwill
194.2 12.3
add: Shareholder loan
165.8 149.5
add: Capitalised transaction costs
18.1 16.6
Carrying value of investment in associate3,972.62,402.6
CDC's functional currency is Australian Dollars (A$) and the summary financial information shown is presented in this
currency. The NZD/AUD exchange rates used to convert the summary financial information to the Group's functional
currency (NZ$) were 0.8344 (Spot rate) (2025: Spot rate 0.9105).
51
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
(6.2) RETIREAUSTRALIA
RetireAustralia is an owner, operator and developer of retirement villages, with villages in New South Wales,
Queensland and South Australia. Infratil held a 50% shareholding in RA (Holdings) 2014 Pty Limited (the
ultimate parent company of RetireAustralia), with investment partner the New Zealand Superannuation
Fund holding the other 50% until the sale in December 2025 (see note 9.3).
Movement in the carrying amount of the Group’s
investment in RetireAustralia:
2026
$Millions
2025
$Millions
Carrying value at 1 April404.3 436.6
Capital contributions - -
Total capital contributions during the year - -
Share of associate’s surplus/(loss) before income tax9.1 83.5
Share of associate’s income tax (expense)(2.8)(29.4)
Total share of associate’s earnings during the year6.3 54.1
Share of associate’s other comprehensive income - -
less: Distributions received - (5.4)
less: Impairment(92.5)(85.8)
FX movements recognised in other comprehensive income12.8 4.8
Transfer to held for sale(330.9) -
Carrying value of investment in associate - 404.3
Summary financial information
2026
A$Millions
2025
A$Millions
Summary information for RetireAustralia is not adjusted for the
percentage ownership held by the Group (unless stated)
Current assets361.3 342.5
Non-current assets3,559.6 3,468.1
Total assets3,920.9 3,810.6
Current liabilities2,602.8 2,535.2
Non-current liabilities414.2 383.1
Total liabilities3,017.0 2,918.3
Net assets (100%)903.9 892.3
Group’s share of net assets452.1 446.2
Group's share of net assets and carrying value of investment (NZ$)423.4 490.1
less: Impairment (NZ$)(92.5)(85.8)
Less: movement to asssets held for sale ($NZ)(330.9) -
Carrying value of investment in associate (NZ$) - 404.3
Revenues182.1
Net surplus/(loss) after tax100.8
Total other comprehensive income -
RetireAustralia's functional currency is Australian Dollars (A$) and the summary financial information shown is presented in
this currency. Unaudited Summary financial information is shown through to 31 July 2025 when the asset was moved to
held for sale prior to its disposal in December 2025. The NZD/AUD exchange rates used to convert the summary financial
information to the Group's functional currency (NZ$) were 0.8344 (Spot rate) (2025: Spot rate 0.9105).
52
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
(6.3) LONGROAD ENERGY
Longroad Energy Holdings, LLC ('Longroad Energy'), is a Boston, MA, headquartered renewable energy
developer focused on the development, ownership, and operation of utility-scale wind and solar energy
projects throughout North America. As at 31 December 2025 Infratil held a 37.17% (2025: 37.01%)
shareholding in Longroad Energy, alongside investment partners the New Zealand Superannuation Fund
(37.17%), MEAG (10.41%) and Longroad Energy management (15.25%).
Infratil recognises its share of the associate's profit or loss based on its percentage holding of the shares
classified as equity under NZ IFRS. This may differ to the economic shareholding when certain shares are
classified as financial liabilities rather than equity under NZ IFRS.
Movement in the carrying amount of the Group’s
investment in Longroad Energy: Notes
2026
$Millions
Restated
2025
$Millions
Carrying value at 1 April164.4 211.5
Restatement - (286.5)
Losses not recognised - 75.0
Capital contributions643.2168.5
Shareholder loans - -
Total capital contributions during the year643.2168.5
Share of associate’s surplus/(loss) before income tax(205.7)(30.1)
Share of associate’s income tax (expense) - -
Gain/(loss) on sale of interest - -
Total share of associate’s earnings during the year(205.7)(30.1)
Share of associate’s other comprehensive income(29.4)5.2
Share of associate’s other reserves - 22.7
Fair value movements - -
less: Distributions received - -
less: Capital returned - -
FX movements recognised in other comprehensive income8.0(1.9)
Carrying value of investment in associate580.5164.4
Summary financial information
31 December
2025
US$Millions
Restated
31 December
2024
US$Millions
Summary information for Longroad is not adjusted for the percentage
ownership held by the Group (unless stated)
Current assets544.8295.7
Non-current assets6,598.7 5,778.6
Total assets7,143.56,074.3
Current liabilities501.0 352.2
Non-current liabilities6,582.8 5,783.4
Total liabilities7,083.8 6,135.6
Net assets (100%)59.7(61.3)
Net assets attributable to owners of Longroad as at 31 December59.7(61.3)
Group’s share of net assets at 31 December26.2(26.9)
Group’s share of net assets at 31 December (NZ$)45.8(47.0)
Losses not recognised-74.9
Movements between 31 December and 31 March 202.982.6
Goodwill 331.853.9
Carrying value of investment in associate (NZ$)580.5164.4
Revenues579.6 401.2
Net surplus/(loss) after tax(81.5)(46.6)
Total other comprehensive income(39.1)36.4
Longroad's functional currency is United States Dollars (US$) and the summary financial information shown is presented in
this currency. The NZD/USD exchange rates used to convert the summary financial information to the Group's functional
currency (NZ$) were 0.5717 (Spot rate) (2025: Spot rate 0.5723). The summary information presented is derived from
the most recent audited annual financial statements of Longroad Energy Holdings, LLC (“LEH”), which are prepared in
accordance with NZ IFRS and have a reporting date of 31 December.
Letter of credit facility
Longroad has obtained an uncommitted secured letter of credit facility of up to US$200 million from HSBC
Bank. Letters of credit under the Facility are on issue to beneficiaries to support the development and
continued operations of Longroad. Infratil has provided shareholder backing of the Longroad Letter of Credit
facility, specifically, Infratil (the New Zealand Superannuation Fund and MEAG) have collectively agreed to
meet up to US$200 million of capital calls (i.e. subscribe for additional units) equal to Longroad’s
reimbursement obligation in the event that a Letter of Credit is called and Longroad cannot fund the call,
taking into account immediately available working capital. As at 31 March 2026, Infratil's share of Longroad's
Letter of Credit facility is 43.4% (31 March 2025: 43.4%). Letters of Credit on issue under the Longroad Letter
of Credit facility at 31 March 2026 are US$135.8 million (Infratil share: US$58.9 million) (31 March 2025:
US$139.7 million (Infratil share: US$60.6 million)).
53
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
(6.4) KAO DATA
Kao Data is an owner, operator and developer of data centres in the United Kingdom. Infratil holds a
54.7% (31 March 2025: 54.0%) shareholding in Kao Data, alongside Legal & General Group 33.4% and
Goldacre 11.7%.
Although Infratil holds a 54.7% interest in Kao Data, the Group does not have the current ability to direct the
relevant activities unilaterally nor is it required to make unanimous decisions with the same party. Accordingly
the Group does not control Kao Data under NZ IFRS 10 nor does it have joint control under NZ IFRS 11.
Movement in the carrying amount of the Group’s investment
in Kao Data:
2026
$Millions
2025
$Millions
Carrying value at 1 April537.4 431.8
Capital contributions64.5 83.0
Shareholder loans -
Capitalised transaction costs -
Total capital contributions during the year
64.5
83.0
Interest on shareholder loan (including accruals) - 4.6
Share of associate’s surplus/(loss) before income tax(45.6)(14.6)
Share of associate’s income tax (expense)(11.6)-
Total share of associate’s earnings in the year
(57.2)(10.0)
Share of associate’s other comprehensive income - -
less: Distributions received - -
less: Shareholder loan repayments including interest - -
FX movements recognised in other comprehensive income12.2 32.6
Carrying value of investment in associate
556.9 537.4
Summary financial information
2026
£Millions
2025
£Millions
Summary information for Kao Data is not adjusted for the
percentage ownership held by the Group (unless stated)
Current assets70.8 39.1
Non-current assets717.3 503.8
Total assets788.1 542.9
Current liabilities305.4 13.4
Non-current liabilities117.2 163.9
Total liabilities422.6 177.3
Net assets (100%)365.5 365.6
Group’s share of net assets199.8 197.5
Revenues73.7 63.8
Net profit/(loss) after tax(26.8)(11.3)
Total other comprehensive income - -
2026
$Millions
2025
$Millions
Reconciliation of the Group’s investment in Kao Data:
Group’s share of net assets in NZD460.7 446.2
Goodwill89.1 84.1
add: Shareholder loan - -
add: Capitalised transaction costs7.1 7.1
Carrying value of investment in associate556.9 537.4
Kao Data's functional currency is the Pound Sterling (GBP) and the summary financial information shown is presented in
this currency. The NZD/GBP exchange rates used to convert the summary financial information to the Group's functional
currency (NZ$) were 0.4336 (Spot rate) (2025: Spot rate 0.4427).
At 31 March 2026, Infratil has contributed £274.6 million (31 March 2025: £231.2 million).
54
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
(6.5) GALILEO
Galileo develops renewable energy projects across Europe. Infratil holds a 38% (31 March 2025: 38%)
shareholding in Galileo, alongside the New Zealand Superannuation Fund (19%), Commonwealth
Superannuation Corporation (19%), the Morrison & Co Growth Infrastructure Fund (19%) and Galileo
Management (5%).
Movement in the carrying amount of the Group’s
investment in Galileo:
2026
$Millions
2025
$Millions
Carrying value at 1 April143.4 99.1
Capital contributions33.8 13.3
Shareholder loans19.1 31.9
Capitalised transaction costs - -
Total capital contributions during the year
52.9
45.2
Interest on shareholder loan (including accruals)3.6 1.8
Share of associate’s surplus/(loss) before income tax(54.4)(9.6)
Share of associate’s income tax (expense)1.0 (0.2)
Total share of associate’s earnings in the year
(49.8)(8.0)
Share of associate’s other comprehensive income - -
Share of associate’s other reserves(2.5)3.9
less: Distributions received - -
less: Shareholder loan repayments including interest - -
FX movements recognised in other comprehensive income
8.9 3.2
Carrying value of investment in associate
152.9 143.4
Letter of credit facility
Galileo has obtained an uncommitted standby letter of credit facility of €90 million from ANZ (London
Branch), executed on 9 October 2020. Letters of credit under the facility are issued to beneficiaries to
support the development and construction of Galileo’s energy projects in Europe. Infratil has provided
shareholder backing of the Galileo Letter of Credit facility, specifically, Infratil (together with its co-investors)
has collectively agreed to meet up to €100 million of capital calls (i.e. subscribe for additional units) equal to
Galileo’s reimbursement obligation in the event that a Letter of Credit is called and Galileo cannot fund the
call. As at 31 March 2026, €46.0 million of Letters of Credit have been issued under the facility (Infratil
share: €17.5 million) (31 March 2025: €45.9 million (Infratil share: €17.4 million)).
Summary financial information
2026
€Millions
2025
€Millions
Summary information for Galileo is not adjusted for the
percentage ownership held by the Group (unless stated)
Current assets160.0 172.6
Non-current assets68.7 67.0
Total assets228.7 239.6
Current liabilities12.415.2
Non-current liabilities147.9117.0
Total liabilities160.3132.2
Net assets (100%)68.4107.4
Group’s share of net assets13.0 24.5
Revenues1.80.6
Net profit/(loss) after tax(71.9)(14.5)
Total other comprehensive income - (14.6)
2026
$Millions
2025
$Millions
Reconciliation of the carrying amount of the Group’s
investment in Galileo:
Group’s share of net assets in NZD26.1 46.3
add: Shareholder loan125.9 96.2
add: Capitalised transaction costs0.9 0.9
Carrying value of investment in associate152.9 143.4
Galileo's functional currency is the Euro (EUR) and the summary financial information shown is presented in this currency.
The NZD/EUR exchange rates used to convert the summary financial information to the Group's functional currency (NZ$)
were 0.4988 (Spot rate) (2025: Spot rate 0.5290).
At 31 March 2026, Infratil has contributed €117.2 million in total (2025: €89.2 million), in the form of shareholder loan
drawdowns (€59.4 million), management loan (€3.2 million) and capital contributions (€54.5 million) (31 March 2025:
shareholder loan drawdowns: €49.4 million, management loan drawdowns: €2.0 million, and capital contributions:
€37.8 million).
55
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
(6.6) FORTYSOUTH
Fortysouth is an owner, operator and developer of passive mobile tower infrastructure. Infratil holds a 20.0%
shareholding (31 March 2025: 20.0%) in Mahi Tahi Towers Limited (the ultimate parent company of
Fortysouth), alongside investment partners InfraRed Capital Partners (40.0%) and Northleaf Capital Partners
(40.0%). During the period, Fortysouth was moved to held for sale, see Note 9.4 for further information.
Movement in the carrying amount of the Group’s
investment in Fortysouth:
2026
$Millions
2025
$Millions
Carrying value at 1 April186.3 195.2
Capital contributions - -
Capitalised transaction costs - -
Total capital contributions during the period - -
Interest on shareholder loan (including accruals) - -
Share of associate’s surplus/(loss) before income tax(7.8)(25.4)
Share of associate’s income tax (expense) - 18.3
Total share of associate’s earnings in the period(7.8)(7.1)
Share of associate’s other comprehensive income - -
less: Distributions received(1.6)(1.8)
less: Investment transferred to held for sale(176.9)
Carrying value of investment in associate - 186.3
Summary financial information
2026
$Millions
2025
$Millions
Summary information for Fortysouth is not adjusted for the
percentage ownership held by the Group (unless stated)
Current assets15.7 15.3
Non-current assets2,104.5 2,107.1
Total assets2,120.2 2,122.4
Current liabilities20.3 20.2
Non-current liabilities1,217.0 1,172.7
Total liabilities1,237.3 1,192.9
Net assets (100%)882.9 929.5
Group’s share of net assets176.5 185.9
Revenues88.4
Net profit/(loss) after tax(67.1)
Total other comprehensive income-
2026
$Millions
2025
$Millions
Reconciliation of the carrying amount of the Group’s
investment in Fortysouth:
Group’s share of net assets176.5 185.9
Goodwill - -
add: Shareholder loan - -
add: Capitalised transaction costs0.4 0.4
less: movement to Assets for Sale ($NZ)(176.9)-
Carrying value of investment in associate - 186.3
Unaudited Summary financial information is shown through to 31 October 2025 when the asset was moved
to held for sale.
56
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
(7) OTHER INVESTMENTS
2026
$Millions
2025
$Millions
Contact Energy1,394.5 -
Clearvision Ventures191.5 156.2
Other33.1 41.8
Other investments1,619.1 198.0
Contact Energy
On 11 July 2025, as part consideration for Contact Energy’s ('Contact') acquisition of Manawa Energy, Infratil
received 93.3 million Contact shares with a fair value of $843.2 million ($9.04 per share) at the transaction
date. Infratil has elected to measure its investment in Contact at fair value through other comprehensive
income ('FVOCI') in accordance with NZ IFRS 9. The investment is classified as level 1 under the fair value
hierarchy as the valuation is based on the listed share price.
On 20 October 2025, Infratil acquired an additional 48.9 million shares in Contact Energy from the Tauranga
Energy Consumer Trust (TECT) for $437.7 million ($8.95 per share). The acquisition was funded using a
combination of existing debt capacity ($218.8 million) and the issue of $218.8 million of new Infratil shares
to TECT at $12.43 per share. On 19 February 2026, Infratil also participated in Contact Energy’s equity raise,
acquiring an additional 8.6 million shares for $75.1 million ($8.75 per share).
As at 31 March 2026, the fair value of Infratil’s investment in Contact Energy was $1,394.5 million, based
on Contact Energy’s closing share price of $9.25 on that date. The increase in fair value of $38.5 million has
been recognised in other comprehensive income. In addition, dividends of $44.2 million were recognised
in profit or loss during the period.
Clearvision Ventures
In February 2016, Infratil made an initial commitment of US$25 million to the California-based Clearvision
Ventures (‘Clearvision’). Further commitments of US$25 million and US$50 million were made in May 2020
and May 2022 respectively, bringing Infratil’s total commitments to US$100 million. The strategic objective
of the investment is to assist Infratil’s businesses to identify and engage with technological developments
that may impact their activities.
Infratil has elected to measure its investment in Clearvision at fair value through other comprehensive
income (‘FVOCI’) in accordance with NZ IFRS 9. The investment is held as an unlisted limited partner interest
and does not confer control or significant influence over the underlying funds.
Fair value is determined by reference to Infratil’s proportionate share of the net asset value of the Clearvision
funds, based on quarterly financial information provided by the fund manager. The underlying portfolio
investments are valued by Clearvision using market-based valuation techniques, including recent
arm’s-length funding transactions and, where appropriate, market comparable analyses.
While observable information is used where available, judgement is required in assessing the relevance
of recent transactions, selecting appropriate comparable companies, and determining adjustments for
differences in scale, growth expectations, liquidity and prevailing market conditions. Accordingly, the
valuation incorporates significant unobservable inputs and the investment is classified as a Level 3 fair
value measurement within the fair value hierarchy.
As at 31 March 2026, Infratil has made total contributions of US$68.2 million (31 March 2025:
US$62.7 million), with the remaining US$31.8 million commitment uncalled at that date.
57
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
(8) ACQUISITION OF SUBSIDIARIES
(8.1) ANYTIME RADIOLOGY
On 19 December 2025, Infratil invested A$104.3 million in Anytime Radiology Group (“Anytime”),
comprising A$89.3 million of equity, a A$5.0 million shareholder loan and a A$10.0 million convertible loan.
These funds, together with funding from other investors, were used by Anytime to acquire the teleradiology
businesses of RHCNZ and Qscan.
Following the transaction, Infratil held a 62.1% interest in Anytime. After assessing control, Infratil determined
that Anytime should be consolidated from the acquisition date.
Because Infratil controlled the teleradiology assets both before the transaction, through RHCNZ and Qscan,
and after the transaction, through Anytime, the transaction has been accounted for as a common control
transaction. It is therefore outside the scope of NZ IFRS 3 Business Combinations. The accounting policy for
common control transactions is set out in Note 1.
From Infratil’s consolidated perspective, the transaction represents a transfer of assets between
subsidiaries. Consolidation adjustments have therefore been made to eliminate the effects of the
transaction recorded by the individual subsidiaries and to present the transaction appropriately in the
Group financial statements.
(9) DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS AND ASSETS HELD FOR SALE
Summary of results of discontinued operations
2026
$Millions
2025
$Millions
Manawa Energy280.2 0.2
Net surplus from discontinued operations after tax280.2 0.2
(9.1) MANAWA ENERGY
On 7 May 2025, the New Zealand Commerce Commission (’NZCC’) granted Contact Energy (’Contact’)
clearance to acquire all the shares in Manawa Energy ('Manawa') under the Scheme of Arrangement
(’Scheme’) that was announced on 11 September 2024. On 11 July 2025, the acquisition of Manawa
by Contact was completed. The Group's 51.1% stake in Manawa was acquired for gross proceeds of
$1,022.4 million comprising cash consideration of $179.2 million and shares in Contact valued at
$843.2 million on completion date. The gain on sale was $272.6 million after transactions costs.
As the carrying amount of the Group’s investment in Manawa has been recovered through the sale
transaction, the investment in Manawa has been classified as a discontinued operation at 31 March 2026.
The comparative consolidated statement of comprehensive income and respective notes have been
restated to show the discontinued operation separately from continuing operations. The results from
discontinued operations are presented separately below.
2026
$Millions
2025
$Millions
Operating revenue125.5 491.0
Total income
125.5 491.0
Depreciation
(5.6)(21.7)
Amortisation of intangibles
(0.2)(1.2)
Employee benefits
(12.9)(38.8)
Operating expenses
(105.7)(368.0)
Total operating expenditure
(124.4)(429.7)
Operating surplus before financing, derivatives, realisations
and impairments1.1 61.3
Net gain/(loss) on foreign exchange and derivatives
23.1 (30.0)
Net realisations, revaluations and impairments
- (3.6)
Interest income
-1.8
Interest expense
(6.8)(29.2)
Net financing expense
(6.8)(27.4)
Net surplus/(loss) before taxation
17.4 0.3
Taxation credit/(expense)
(9.8)(0.1)
Net surplus/(loss) for the period
7.6 0.2
Net realisations, revaluations and impairments
272.6 -
Net surplus/(loss) from discontinued operations
280.2 0.2
Basic and diluted earnings per share (cents per share) from
discontinuing operations28.5 -
Total assets
-2,297.4
Total liabilities
-1,058.2
Net assets of discontinued operation
-1,239.2
The net gain on sale is calculated as follows:
Gross sale proceeds
1,022.4
Infratil carrying amount of assets and liabilities as at the
date of sale (including Goodwill)(748.3)
Gain on sale
274.1
Transaction costs
(1.5)
Net gain on sale272.6
58
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
The profit from the discontinued operation is 51.1% attributable to the owners of the Company in line with
the Group's ownership percentage in Manawa.
2026
$Millions
2025
$Millions
Cash flows from/(used in) discontinued operation
Net cash from/(used in) operating activities3.3 49.5
Net cash from/(used in) investing activities0.3 (48.7)
Net cash from/(used in) financing activities(1.3) -
Net cash flows for the period2.3 0.8
(9.2) INFRATIL INFRASTRUCTURE PROPERTY
In June 2022, the Board of Infratil Infrastructure Property Limited (IIPL) approved the marketing of IIPL’s
investment property at 100 Halsey Street, known as Wynyard 100, for potential sale. The property has
been classified as held for sale since that date.
On 30 November 2025, the sale of Wynyard 100 completed for $54.8 million, subject to final completion
adjustments. The investment property, right-of-use asset and lease liability were derecognised on
completion.
Wynyard 100 has not been classified as a discontinued operation, as it does not represent a separate major
line of business or geographical area of operation for the Group.
(9.3) RETIREAUSTRALIA
On 7 August 2025, Infratil and the New Zealand Superannuation Fund announced that they had entered into
a binding agreement to sell RetireAustralia to Invesco Real Estate, the global real estate investment business
of Invesco Ltd. The sale was subject to a limited number of conditions. At that date, the sale was assessed as
highly probable and the investment was classified as held for sale.
As a result, Infratil stopped equity accounting for RetireAustralia and measured the investment at fair value.
Fair value was based on the expected final sale proceeds. The sale completed on 19 December 2025. Infratil
received A$290.8 million, or NZ$333.2 million, after transaction costs, and derecognised its investment in
RetireAustralia. RetireAustralia has not been presented as a discontinued operation, as it does not represent
a separate major line of business or geographical area of operation for the Group.
(9.4) FORTYSOUTH
On 10 November 2025, Infratil entered into a conditional agreement to sell its 20% shareholding in
Fortysouth to InfraRed Capital Partners and Pantheon for a proposed consideration of $212.5 million. Based
on the terms of the transaction and the status at that date, the sale was assessed as highly probable and the
investment in Fortysouth was accordingly classified as held for sale.
Following classification as held for sale, Infratil ceased equity accounting for Fortysouth. The investment was
measured at the lower of its carrying value and fair value less costs to sell, based on the expected proceeds
from the transaction.
Fortysouth has not been presented as a discontinued operation, as it does not represent a separate major
line of business or geographical area of operation for the Group.
59
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
(10) REVENUE
2026
$Millions
2025
$Millions
Mobile service revenue1,020.1 965.3
Fixed service revenue
654.2 680.0
Device and other revenue
306.6 268.4
Other telecommunications revenue
20.6 8.1
Aircraft movement and terminal charges
112.2 110.4
Transport, hotel and other trading activities
52.1 51.4
Radiology practice services
182.9 189.4
Radiology services
585.3 521.8
Other
65.1 61.0
Total operating revenue2,999.1 2,855.8
Revenue Recognition Policies
The nature and timing of the various performance obligations in the Group’s contracts with customers and
property leases and when revenue is recognised is outlined below:
Description of performance obligations Timing and satisfaction of performance obligations
Mobile and fixed service revenue
This category includes One NZ's revenue from
mobile services, fixed line broadband and home
phone revenues.
Service revenue is recognised over time, when or
as One NZ performs the related service during the
agreed service period (usually monthly).
Customers typically pay in advance for prepay
mobile services and are billed and pay monthly for
other communication services. Fixed services
customers are billed and pay in arrears.
Description of performance obligations Timing and satisfaction of performance obligations
Device and other revenue
This category includes One NZ's device sales of,
mainly, handsets and modems.
For device sales made to customers, revenue is
recognised when the device is delivered to the end
customer. Customers typically pay for handsets
and other equipment either up-front at the time of
sale or over the term of the related service
agreement (usually 12 to 36 months), as the Group
performs the related service (usually monthly).
For device sales made to intermediaries such as
indirect channel dealers, revenue is recognised if
control of the device has transferred to the
intermediary and the intermediary has no right to
return the device to receive a refund; otherwise
revenue recognition is deferred until sale of the
device to an end customer by the intermediary or
the expiry of any right of return.
Aircraft movement and terminal charges
Aircraft movement and terminal charges consists
of Wellington International Airport's airfield
income, passenger service charges and terminal
service charges.
Airfield income consists of landing charges and
aircraft parking charges.
Landing charges and aircraft parking charges are
paid by the airlines and recognised as revenue at the
point in time the airport facilities are used by the
arriving or departing aircraft.
Passenger services charges and terminal service
charges relating to arriving, departing and transiting
passengers are paid by the airlines and recognised
as revenue at the point in time when the passenger
travels or the airport facilities are used.
Transport, hotel and other trading activities
Transport, hotel and other trading activities
includes Wellington International Airport's hotel
and access to the airport’s car parking facilities.
This category also includes income from the hotel
and carpark owned by Infratil Infrastructure
Property Limited.
Revenue from car parking is recognised at the point
in time where the utilisation of car parking facilities
has been completed.
Revenue from the hotels is recognised at the point in
time the service is delivered.
60
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
Description of performance obligations Timing and satisfaction of performance obligations
Radiology practice services
Radiology practice services revenue is derived by
Qscan Group from services to medical
practitioners. Revenue is recognised net of
amounts payable to doctors under Practice
Management Agreements.
Radiology practice services revenue is recognised
at the point in time when the services are delivered
to the medical practitioner.
Radiology services
Radiology services revenue is derived by Qscan
Group, RHCNZ Medical Imaging and Anytime
Radiology Group from providing radiology
services to patients.
Radiology services revenue is recognised at the
point in time when the radiology or other medical
imaging services are provided to a patient and a
charge is levied for this service.
Other revenue includes Wellington International Airport's retail concession fees and rental income. Retail
concession fees are recognised as revenue based upon passenger throughput or the turnover of the
concessionaires and in accordance with the related agreements. Rental income is recognised as revenue
on a straight-line basis over the term of the leases on leases where the group is the lessor.
(11) NET REALISATIONS, REVALUATIONS AND IMPAIRMENTS
2026
$Millions
2025
$Millions
Impairment of assets(92.7)(85.8)
Assets held for sale revaluation(15.5)(24.1)
Investment property revaluation6.3 1.6
Other realisations, revaluations and (impairments)2.6 1.0
Total other operating expenses(99.3)(107.3)
The current year impairment of assets primarily relates to the remeasurement of RetireAustralia to its final
sale value (refer Note 9.3). The investment in RetireAustralia was impaired in the prior year ($85.8 million)
following a review of the asset valuation, including comparisons to market-based comparables, where the
recoverable amount was determined to be lower than the carrying value.
(12) OPERATING EXPENSES
Notes
2026
$Millions
2025
$Millions
Trading operations
Line and generation asset maintenance costs - 8.2
Other electricity business costs29.7 16.0
Telecommunications - interconnect and access costs286.1 293.8
Telecommunications - device and other product costs335.7 295.4
Telecommunications - other direct and variable costs166.4 144.4
Telecommunications - outsourced services60.6 56.1
Telecommunications - IT and network costs158.3 139.1
Telecommunications - other operating business costs117.4 123.4
Diagnostic imaging costs168.5 158.2
Airport business costs42.6 38.0
Bad debts written off1.3 0.4
Increase/(Decrease) in expected credit losses22.1 6.0 14.2
Directors’ fees27 4.5 4.2
Administration and other corporate costs28.6 29.1
Management fee (to related party Morrison Infrastructure
Management Limited)29 101.4 456.2
Donations2.3 3.3
Total other operating expenses1,509.4 1,780.0
61
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
Fees paid to auditors (including fees paid by Associates)
2026
Fees paid to the
Group auditor
$000’s
2025
Audit fees paid to
other auditors
$000's
Audit and review of financial statements3,698.43,472.9
Regulatory audit work90.0 43.0
Other assurance services50.3 321.4
Taxation services - 71.7
Other services 73.0 59.5
3,911.73,968.5
Audit fees paid to the Group auditor recognised through associates1,363.5 1,860.2
Other fees paid to the Group auditor recognised through associates352.1 398.8
Total fees paid to the Group auditor
5,627.36,227.5
In the above table the audit fee includes the fees for both the annual audit of the financial statements and
the review of the interim financial statements. Regulatory audit work consists of the audit of regulatory
disclosures. Other assurance services comprise of agreed upon procedures, climate related assurance and
audit of compliance reports. Other services relate to an engineering contract advisory service provided to a
subsidiary of the group. Tax services relate to tax compliance work and tax advisory services provided to a
subsidiary of the group.
(13) TAXATION
(13.1) TAX RECONCILIATION
2026
$Millions
Restated
2025
$Millions
Net surplus before taxation from continuing operations155.2(223.7)
Taxation on the surplus for the year @ 28%
(43.5)62.6
Plus/(less) taxation adjustments:
Effect of tax rates in foreign jurisdictions
(21.5)(6.1)
Net benefit of imputation credits
7.0 -
Foreign tax credits
(0.2) -
Exempt dividends
- -
Tax losses
(12.5)(9.1)
Effect of equity accounted earnings of associates
176.9 143.5
Recognition of previously unrecognised deferred tax
5.5 -
(Over)/under provision in prior periods
83.9 2.9
Net investment realisations
(42.7)(6.7)
Other permanent differences
(14.0)(233.4)
Taxation credit/(expense)138.9(46.3)
Current taxation (13.7)(83.3)
Deferred taxation 152.637.0
Tax on discontinued operations(9.8)(0.1)
The Group is headquartered in New Zealand. The Group is within the scope of the OECD Pillar Two Model
Rules for all of the jurisdictions that it operates in for the financial reporting period ended 31 March 2026.
The Group has applied a temporary mandatory relief from deferred tax accounting in respect of the Pillar Two
Model Rules and will account for it as a current tax arising under the Pillar Two Model Rules when it is incurred.
Under Pillar Two legislation, the Group may be liable to pay a top-up tax where the effective tax rate per
jurisdiction, based on the specific Pillar Two calculation requirements, is below the 15% minimum rate. The
Group has assessed the exposure to Pillar Two income taxes and has no current tax exposure for the period
ended 31 March 2026.
62
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
(13.2) INCOME TAX RECOGNISED IN OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
2026
Before tax
$Millions
Tax
(expense) /
benefit
$Millions
Net of tax
$Millions
Differences arising on translation of foreign operations350.12.6352.7
Realisations on disposal of subsidiary, reclassified to profit
and loss(674.6) - (674.6)
Fair value change of equity investments61.8 - 61.8
Ineffective portion of hedges taken to profit and loss3.4 (3.4) -
Effective portion of changes in fair value of cash flow hedges147.0 (44.1)102.9
Fair value movements in relation to executive share scheme - - -
Net change in fair value of property, plant and equipment
recognised in equity 15.4 (5.7)9.7
Share of associates’ other comprehensive income(46.2) - (46.2)
Balance at the end of the year(143.1)(50.6)(193.7)
2025
Restated
Before tax
$Millions
Restated Tax
(expense) /
benefit
$Millions
Restated
Net of tax
$Millions
Differences arising on translation of foreign operations76.7 3.8 80.5
Realisations on disposal of subsidiary, reclassified to profit
and loss(3.5) - (3.5)
Fair value change of equity investments(1.0) - (1.0)
Ineffective portion of hedges taken to profit and loss(1.4)1.4 -
Effective portion of changes in fair value of cash flow hedges(170.1)46.2 (123.9)
Net change in fair value of property, plant and equipment
recognised in equity 229.6(37.4)192.2
Share of associates’ other comprehensive income29.2 - 29.2
Balance at the end of the year159.514.0 173.5
(13.3) DEFERRED TAX
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset on the Statement of Financial Position where they relate to
entities with a legally enforceable right to offset tax.
2026
$Millions
Restated
2025
$Millions
Balance at the beginning of the year(204.4)(254.4)
Charge for the year
142.537.0
Charge relating to discontinued operations
0.5 3.5
Deferred tax recognised in OCI
(50.6)10.3
Acquired with Business Combination
0.1 -
Reclassification of prior year difference
10.1 (3.9)
Effect of movements in foreign exchange rates
(3.2)7.1
Tax losses recognised/(utilised)
(13.2)(4.0)
Transfers on disposal of subsidiaries
235.4 -
Balance at the end of the year117.2(204.4)
The Infratil New Zealand Group is forecasting to derive taxable profits in future periods, sufficient to utilise
the tax losses carried forward and deductible temporary differences. As a result, deferred tax assets and
liabilities have been recognised where they arise, including deferred tax on tax losses carried forward.
63
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
(13.4) RECOGNISED DEFERRED TAX ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
31 March 2026
Assets
$Millions
Liabilities
$Millions
Net
$Millions
Property, plant and equipment30.2 (223.9)(193.7)
Investment properties - (2.6)(2.6)
Derivative financial instruments0.5 (3.7)(3.2)
Employee benefits19.8 - 19.8
Customer base assets - (107.1)(107.1)
Provisions30.9 - 30.9
Tax losses carried forward145.4 - 145.4
Lease liabilities358.8 - 358.8
Right of use assets - (336.3)(336.3)
Other items206.1(0.9)205.2
Total791.7(674.5)117.2
31 March 2025 Restated
Property, plant and equipment14.7 (442.0)(427.3)
Investment properties - (1.7)(1.7)
Derivative financial instruments43.1 (1.1)42.0
Employee benefits21.1 - 21.1
Customer base assets - (122.4)(122.4)
Provisions35.3 - 35.3
Tax losses carried forward90.9 (22.7)68.2
Lease liabilities353.7 (3.0)350.7
Right of use assets2.8 (330.0)(327.2)
Other items79.0 77.9 156.9
Total640.6 (845.0)(204.4)
(13.5) CHANGES IN TEMPORARY DIFFERENCES AFFECTING TAX EXPENSE
Tax expense/(credit)Other comprehensive income
2026
$Millions
Restated
2025
$Millions
2026
$Millions
Restated
2025
$Millions
Property, plant and equipment10.3 54.7 (5.7)(10.6)
Investment properties(0.9)0.4 - -
Derivative financial instruments(6.1)13.9 (44.1)39.2
Employee benefits0.4 2.6 - -
Customer base assets16.5 (5.7)(3.4)8.4
Provisions(4.4)(12.9) - -
Tax losses carried forward90.2 (89.7) - -
Lease liabilities2.8 51.1 - -
Right of use assets(3.7)(32.3) - -
Other items47.554.9 2.6(23.0)
152.637.0 (50.6)14.0
(13.6) IMPUTATION CREDITS AVAILABLE TO BE USED BY INFRATIL LIMITED
2026
$Millions
2025
$Millions
Balance at the end of the year8.5 5.6
Imputation credits that will arise on the payment/(refund)
of tax provided for
- -
Imputation credits that will arise on the (payment)/receipt
of dividends accrued at year end
- -
Imputation credits available for use8.5 5.6
64
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
(14) PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
2026
Communication and
network equipment
$Millions
Land and
civil works
$Millions
Buildings
$Millions
Vehicles, plant
and equipment
$Millions
Capital work
in progress
$Millions
Leasehold
improvements
$Millions
Renewable
generation assets
$Millions
Total
$Millions
Cost or valuation
Balance at beginning of year1,243.0 921.6 694.2 431.4 399.5 139.1 1,948.7 5,777.5
Additions91.4 18.9 - 56.7 281.9 4.2 0.1 453.2
Additions on acquisition of subsidiary - - - 1.4 10.7 1.0 - 13.1
Capitalised interest and financing costs - - - - - - - -
Disposals(3.6)(0.6) - (15.2) - (4.7) - (24.1)
Disposal of subsidiaries - (25.7)(2.2)(32.7)(92.9) - (1,948.7)(2,102.2)
Impairment - 0.4 - - - - - 0.4
Revaluation - 3.2 17.3 - - - - 20.5
Transfers between categories48.1 76.9 57.9 31.3 (334.1)33.4 86.5 -
Transfers to assets classified as held for sale(17.0) - - - - - - (17.0)
Transfer to right of use assets - - - - - - - -
Transfers to intangible assets - - - - (0.1)0.1 - -
Transfers from/(to) investment properties - - - - (4.6) - - (4.6)
Transfers from / (to) cost and accumulated depreciation(40.0) - - (3.6)0.5 - - (43.1)
Effect of movements in foreign exchange rates - (1.0) - 13.2 (5.7)5.6 (0.6)11.5
Balance at end of year1,321.9 993.7 767.2 482.5 255.2 178.7 86.0 4,085.2
Accumulated depreciation
Balance at beginning of year475.4 3.6 35.4 190.8 - 25.0 - 730.2
Depreciation for the year211.2 10.2 18.1 52.6 - 10.4 6.0 308.5
Transfer from/(to) cost and accumulated depreciation(41.8) - - (1.4) - - - (43.2)
Revaluation - - - - - - - -
Disposals(3.7) - - (14.5) - (2.8) - (21.0)
Disposal of subsidiaries - (4.0)(0.9)(17.5) - - (4.2)(26.6)
Transfers between categories - - - - - - - -
Transfer to assets classified as held for sale
(14.8) - - - - - - (14.8)
Effect of movements in foreign exchange rates - - - 6.2 - 1.3 - 7.5
Balance at end of year626.3 9.8 52.6 216.2 - 33.9 1.8 940.6
Carrying value at 31 March 2026695.6 983.9 714.6 266.3 255.2 144.8 84.2 3,144.6
65
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
Carrying value by Subsidiary
2026
Communication and
network equipment
$Millions
Land and
civil works
$Millions
Buildings
$Millions
Vehicles, plant
and equipment
$Millions
Capital work
in progress
$Millions
Leasehold
improvements
$Millions
Renewable
generation assets
$Millions
Total
$Millions
Gurīn Energy - 12.3 - 1.7 90.4 - 84.2 188.6
Anytime Radiology - - - (0.1)0.2 - - 0.1
Mint Renewables - - - 2.0 0.2 - - 2.2
One NZ695.6 - - 40.6 68.7 - - 804.9
Qscan Group - - - 94.8 6.8 55.0 - 156.6
RHCNZ Medical Imaging - - - 98.6 4.4 89.8 - 192.8
Wellington International Airport - 971.6 714.6 28.7 84.5 - - 1,799.4
Carrying value at 31 March 2026 695.6 983.9 714.6 266.3 255.2 144.8 84.2 3,144.6
66
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
(14) PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT CONTINUED
2025
Communication and
network equipment
$Millions
Land and
civil works
$Millions
Buildings
$Millions
Vehicles, plant
and equipment
$Millions
Capital work
in progress
$Millions
Leasehold
improvements
$Millions
Renewable
generation assets
$Millions
Total
$Millions
Cost or valuation
Balance at beginning of year1,053.2 914.8 660.1 372.7 404.7 113.7 1,705.7 5,224.9
Additions - 16.3 - 42.5 298.7 2.8 52.4 412.7
Additions on acquisition of subsidiary - - - - 4.5 - - 4.5
Capitalised interest and financing costs - - - - - - - -
Disposals(1.3)0.1 - (14.5) - (1.9)(0.1)(17.7)
Impairment - - - - - - (3.3)(3.3)
Revaluation - (30.0)25.4 - - - 194.0 189.4
Transfers between categories207.7 28.5 14.0 31.1 (305.3)24.0 - -
Transfers to assets classified as held for sale - - - - - - - -
Transfer to right of use assets - - - - - - - -
Transfers to intangible assets(16.6) - - (1.4)(6.1) - - (24.1)
Transfers from/(to) investment properties - (8.1)(5.3) - - - - (13.4)
Effect of movements in foreign exchange rates - - - 1.0 3.0 0.5 - 4.5
Balance at end of year1,243.0 921.6 694.2 431.4 399.5 139.1 1,948.7 5,777.5
Accumulated depreciation
Balance at beginning of year227.9 36.9 17.9 146.4 - 17.1 14.9 461.1
Depreciation for the year248.3 9.1 16.9 53.4 - 8.7 16.9 353.3
Depreciation and amortisation on
acquisition of subsidiary - - - - - - - -
Transfer from/(to) investment properties - - - - - - - -
Revaluation - (42.4) - - - - (31.8)(74.2)
Disposals(0.8) - 0.6 (9.2) - (0.9) - (10.3)
Transfers to assets classified as held for sale - - - - - - - -
Effect of movements in foreign exchange rates - - - 0.2 - 0.1 - 0.3
Balance at end of year475.4 3.6 35.4 190.8 - 25.0 - 730.2
Carrying value at 31 March 2025767.6 918.0 658.8 240.6 399.5 114.1 1,948.7 5,047.3
67
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
Carrying value by Subsidiary
2025
Communication and
network equipment
$Millions
Land and
civil works
$Millions
Buildings
$Millions
Vehicles, plant
and equipment
$Millions
Capital work
in progress
$Millions
Leasehold
improvements
$Millions
Renewable
generation assets
$Millions
Total
$Millions
Gurīn Energy - - - 0.5 111.3 - - 111.8
Manawa Energy - 17.0 1.4 15.5 89.1 - 1,948.7 2,071.7
Mint Renewables - - - 1.8 - - - 1.8
One NZ767.6 - - 33.7 57.1 - - 858.4
Qscan Group - - - 79.6 3.5 50.7 - 133.8
RHCNZ Medical Imaging - - - 88.1 17.0 63.4 - 168.5
Wellington International Airport - 901.0 657.4 21.4 121.5 - - 1,701.3
Carrying value at 31 March 2025767.6 918.0 658.8 240.6 399.5 114.1 1,948.7 5,047.3
For assets held at fair value less accumulated depreciation valuations are undertaken on a systematic basis
at least every five years. In years where a valuation is not undertaken, a material change assessment of each
asset class is performed to assess whether carrying amounts differ materially from fair value. This
assessment is undertaken with assistance from independent experts and includes reference to projections
of future revenues, volumes, operational and capital expenditure profiles, capacity, terminal values, the
application of discount rates and replacement values (as relevant to each class of asset) as an indicator of a
possible material change in fair value. Where a material change in fair value is identified, the carrying value is
adjusted to bring carrying value materially in line with fair value.
As at 31 March 2026, for Wellington International Airport assets measured at fair value less accumulated
depreciation, where no external valuation was undertaken, a material change assessment was performed.
A summary of the fair value considerations are provided below.
Wellington International Airport’s property, plant and equipment
Wellington Airport’s Land, Civil Assets and Buildings are measured at fair value.
Land
The Group's assessment of land includes reference to NZ and Wellington house price indices published by
Real Estate Institute of NZ, changes in commercial and industrial property values and consideration of other
key inputs. Using the last independent external valuation performed for the year ended 31 March 2023 as
a base, further work was performed to estimate fair value including an assessment of key inputs into land
value. Based on this assessment, there is no material change in the estimated fair value of Land compared
to the prior year ended 31 March 2025 (2025: no material change).
Civil Assets
Civil Assets were valued based on the Group's assessment which includes reference to the Capital Goods
Price Index and the Producers Price Index, a fair value increase of $3.2m has been made to the carrying
value of these assets in the Asset Revaluation Reserve and Other Comprehensive Income (2025: a full
revaluation was undertaken with a net increase of $12.4 million).
Buildings
The Buildings asset class is comprised of three main sub-components; (a) Specialised buildings, (b) Vehicle
business assets and (c) Hotel business assets.
(a) Specialised buildings
Based on the Group's assessment which includes reference to the capital goods price index and consumer
price index, a fair value increase of $6.9 million has been made to the carrying value of these assets in the
Asset Revaluation Reserve and Other Comprehensive Income (2025: $5.7 million).
(b) Vehicle business assets
Based on the Group's assessment which includes reference to passenger forecasts and discounted cash
flow modelling, a fair value increase of $9.9 million has been made to the carrying value of these assets in
the Asset Revaluation Reserve and Other Comprehensive Income (2025: $17.4 million).
(c) Hotel business assets
Based on the Group's assessment which includes reference to passenger forecasts and discounted cash
flow modelling, a fair value increase of $0.5 million has been made to the carrying value of these assets in
the Asset Revaluation Reserve and Other Comprehensive Income (2025: $2.3 million).
68
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
The following table summarises the valuation approach and key assumptions used by the independent
valuers to arrive at fair value at the date of the last independent external valuation. Where there have been
fair value adjustments in the year ended 31 March 2026, further detail has been provided under the
respective asset classes below.
Asset classification and description
Valuation
approachKey valuation assumptions
+/- 5%
Valuation
impact
Land
Aeronautical land - used for airport
activities and specialised aeronautical
assets.
Non-aeronautical land - used for
non-aeronautical purposes e.g.
industrial, service, retail, residential
and land associated with the vehicle
business.
Market
Value for
Existing Use
(’MVEU’)
Average
MVAU rate
per hectare
$2.74 million
per hectare
+/- $28.0m
Developer’s
WACC rate
12.20%+/- $15.0m
Holding
period
6 years+/- $22.0m
Last external valuation undertaken as at 31 March 2023 by independent valuers, CBRE Limited. For the
year ended 31 March 2026, a material change assessment has been undertaken, and further work carried
out which indicates no material change in fair value compared to 31 March 2025. In relation to the value
at 31 March 2026, a 5% change in the indices referenced equates to +/- $29.0 million in fair value. A 5%
change in developers WACC rate equates to +/- $16.0 million in fair value.
Asset classification and description
Valuation
approachKey valuation assumptions
+/- 5%
Valuation
impact
Civil
Civil works includes sea
protection and site services,
excluding such site services
to the extent that they would
otherwise create duplication
of value.
Optimised
Depreciated
Replacement
Cost (’ODRC’)
Average cost
rates per sqm
for concrete,
asphalt, base
course and
foundations
Concrete $163
Asphalt $191
Basecourse
$142
Foundations
$30
+/- $4.5m
Estimated
remaining
useful life
Average
remaining useful
life 23.5 years
+/- $7.1m
Last external valuation undertaken as at 31 March 2025 by independent valuers, Beca Limited valued civil
assets at $291.4 million. For the year ended 31 March 2026, a material change assessment has been
undertaken, and for the further work carried out which resulted in a fair value increase of $3.2 million. In
relation to the value at 31 March 2026, a 5% change in the indices referenced equates to +/- $2.1 million
in fair value. .
Asset classification and description
Valuation
approachKey valuation assumptions
+/- 5%
Valuation
impact
Buildings
Specialised buildings used for
identified airport activities.
Non-specialised buildings used
for purposes other than
for identified airport activities,
including space allocated within
the main terminal building for
retail activities, offices and
storage.
Optimised
Depreciated
Replacement
Cost (’ODRC’)
Average
modern
equivalent
asset rate
(per sqm)
$9,273
$2,089
+/- $15.7m
+/- $0.2m
Vehicle business assets
associated with car parking and
taxi, shuttle and bus services
(excluding land and civil).
Discounted
Cash flows
(’DCF’) and
Capitalisation
Rate
Revenue
growth
Cost growth
Discount rate
Capitalisation
2.20%
2.12%
9.75%
7.75%
+/- $0.5m
+/- $0.5m
+/- $4.8m
+/- $7.5m
Last external valuation undertaken as at 31 March 2023 by independent valuers, CBRE Limited. For the
year ended 31 March 2026, a material change assessment has been undertaken, and further work carried
out which resulted in a fair value increase of $17.3 million. In relation to the value of specialised buildings
at 31 March 2026, a 5% change in the indices referenced equates to +/- $0.5 million in fair value. In
relation to the value of vehicle business assets, a 2% change in passenger cashflow forecasts equates
to +/- $10.0 million in fair value.
69
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
Asset classification and description
Valuation
approachKey valuation assumptions
+/- 5%
Valuation
impact
Hotel business assets
Discounted
Cash flows
(’DCF’) and
Capitalisation
Rate
Capitalisation
rate
7.25%+/- $1.6m
Discount rate9.25%+/- $0.8m
Last external valuation undertaken as at 31 March 2023 by independent valuers, CBRE Limited. For the year
ended 31 March 2026, a material change assessment has been undertaken, and further work carried out
which resulted in a fair value increase of $0.5 million. In relation to the value at 31 March 2026, a 5% change
in the indices referenced equates to +/- $1.2 million in fair value.
Effect of level 3 fair value measurements on profit or loss and other comprehensive income
The following table summarises for property, plant and equipment measured at fair value, classified as level 3
in the fair value hierarchy, the effect of the fair value movements on profit or loss and other comprehensive
income for the year. Items classified as level 3 contain valuation inputs for the asset that are not based on
observable market data.
2026
Recognised in
profit or loss
$Millions
Recognised
in OCI
$Millions
Total
$Millions
Level 3 fair value movements
Renewable generation assets - - -
Land and civil works - 3.2 3.2
Buildings
- 17.3 17.3
- 20.5 20.5
2025
Recognised in
profit or loss
$Millions
Recognised
in OCI
$Millions
Total
$Millions
Level 3 fair value movements
Renewable generation assets(3.3)225.8 222.5
Land and civil works - 12.4 12.4
Buildings
- 25.4 25.4
(3.3)263.6 260.3
There were no transfers between property, plant and equipment assets classified as level 1 or level 2, and
level 3 of the fair value hierarchy during the year ended 31 March 2026 (2025: nil).
Revalued assets at deemed cost
For each revalued class the carrying amount that would have been recognised had the assets been carried
on a historical cost basis are as follows:
2026
Cost
$Millions
Accumulated
depreciation
$Millions
Net book
value
$Millions
Renewable generation assets -
-
-
Land and civil works516.5
(82.7)
433.8
Buildings655.7
(224.8)
430.9
1,172.2 (307.5)864.7
2025
Cost
$Millions
Accumulated
depreciation
$Millions
Net book
value
$Millions
Renewable generation assets766.9
-
766.9
Land and civil works440.2 (82.4)357.8
Buildings777.1 (300.6)476.5
1,984.2 (383.0)1,601.2
70
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
(15) INVESTMENT PROPERTIES
2026
Owned
property
$Millions
Right of use
assets
$Millions
Total
$Millions
Balance at beginning of year103.1
-
103.1
Additions -
-
-
Disposals -
-
-
Transfers from/(to) property, plant and equipment4.6
-
4.6
Investment properties revaluation net increase/(decrease)6.3
-
6.3
Transfers to assets held for sale -
-
-
Balance at end of year114.0 - 114.0
2025
Owned
property
$Millions
Right of use
assets
$Millions
Total
$Millions
Balance at beginning of year90.0 35.2 125.2
Additions - - -
Disposals(2.0)(35.2) (37.2)
Transfers from/(to) property, plant and equipment13.4 - 13.4
Investment properties revaluation net increase/(decrease)(22.3)(0.2) (22.5)
Transfers to assets held for sale
24.0 0.2 24.2
Balance at end of year103.1 - 103.1
The Group’s investment properties relate to properties held by Wellington International Airport for the
primary purpose of earning rental income. The fair value of these properties is estimated each year by an
independent valuer, Jones Lang LaSalle, and reflects market conditions at balance date. Changes in market
conditions, or in the assumptions used to estimate fair value, may result in changes to the fair value of the
investment properties.
The valuation of Wellington International Airport’s investment properties is based on a discounted cash
flow and capitalisation rate approach. The fair value at 31 March 2026 was $114.0 million (31 March 2025:
$103.1 million).
Where a lease relates to property held to earn rental income, the right-of-use asset is included within
investment properties and measured at fair value.
Rental income from investment properties of $14.1 million was recognised in profit or loss during the year
(2025: $15.1 million). Direct operating expenses arising from investment properties of $1.6 million were also
recognised in profit or loss during the year (2025: $3.3 million).
The following table summarises the valuation approach and key assumptions used by the independent
valuer to determine fair value. The most recent external valuation was undertaken by Jones Lang LaSalle
as at 31 March 2026.
Description
Valuation
approach
Fair value
hierarchy
levelSignificant unobservable inputs
Relationship of
unobservable inputs
to fair value
Wellington
International
Airport
Airport Retail
Park and other
properties held
to earn rental
income.
DCF and
Cap rate
3 Weighted
average
discount rate
7.85%
(2025: 7.63%)
An increase in the
discount rate will
decrease the fair
value.
Weighted
average
income
capitalisation
rate
6.69+%
(2025: 7.04%)
An increase
in the capitalisation
rate will decrease the
fair value.
Weighted
average lease
term
3.173 years
(2025: 3.13
years)
An increase in the
average lease term
will ordinarily increase
the fair value.
Last external valuation undertaken as at 31 March 2026 by independent valuers, Jones Lang LaSalle.
71
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
(16) LEASES
(16.1) RIGHT OF USE ASSETS
Right of use assets related to leased properties that do not meet the definition of investment properties are
summarised below. Land and buildings right of use assets include land held under ground leases and rental of
office space.
2026
Cell sites
$Millions
Land and
Buildings
$Millions
Plant and
equipment
$Millions
Total
$Millions
Cost
Balance at beginning of year
802.4 475.6 145.1 1,423.1
Additions
71.7 122.3 2.6 196.6
Additions on acquisition of subsidiary
- 10.0 - 10.0
Disposals
(10.7)(59.6)(4.3)(74.6)
Disposals - discontinued operations
- (11.6)(0.2)(11.8)
Remeasurements
- 0.9 - 0.9
Effect of movements in exchange rates
- 13.2 - 13.2
Transfers to assets held for sale - - - -
Balance at end of year863.4 550.8 143.2 1,557.4
Accumulated depreciation
Balance at beginning of year88.2 178.9 25.9 293.0
Depreciation for the year51.4 49.0 6.6 107.0
Effect of movements in exchange rates - 6.5 -6.5
Disposals(2.3)(48.8)(4.3)(55.4)
Disposals - discontinued operations - (2.7)(0.2)(2.9)
Transfers to assets held for sale - - - -
Balance at end of year137.3 182.9 28.0 348.2
Carrying value at 31 March 2026726.1 367.9 115.2 1,209.2
2025
Cell sites
$Millions
Land and
Buildings
$Millions
Plant and
equipment
$Millions
Total
$Millions
Cost
Balance at beginning of year
749.8
407.6 140.4 1,297.8
Additions
66.0
42.5 5.7 114.2
Additions on acquisition of subsidiary
-
- - -
Disposals
(13.4)
(12.7)(1.0)(27.1)
Remeasurements
-
36.9 - 36.9
Effect of movements in exchange rates
-
1.3 - 1.3
Transfers to assets held for sale
- -
- -
Balance at end of year802.4 475.6 145.1 1,423.1
Accumulated depreciation
Balance at beginning of year
42.9 139.8 20.2
202.9
Depreciation for the year
47.8 45.5 6.4 99.7
Effect of movements in exchange rates
- 0.4 - 0.4
Disposals
(2.5)(6.8)(0.7)(10.0)
Transfers to assets held for sale
- - - -
Balance at end of year88.2 178.9 25.9 293.0
Carrying value at 31 March 2025714.2 296.7 119.2 1,130.1
Lease liabilities relate to the Group’s obligations to make lease payments for leased assets recognised on
the balance sheet. The following table presents a maturity analysis of these lease liabilities, showing the
undiscounted lease payments payable after the reporting date.
72
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
(16.2) LEASE LIABILITIES
2026
$Millions
2025
$Millions
Maturity analysis - contractual undiscounted cash flows
Between 0 to 1 year
172.7 156.1
Between 1 to 2 years
165.2 158.2
Between 2 to 5 years
445.9 379.8
More than 5 years
1,514.3 1,526.6
Change attributable to held for sale
- (207.0)
Total undiscounted lease liabilities2,298.1 2,013.7
2026
$Millions
2025
$Millions
Lease liabilities included in the statement of financial position
Split as follows:
Current
87.5 82.7
Non-current
1,237.7 1,086.8
1,325.2 1,169.5
2026
$Millions
2025
$Millions
Amounts recognised in the consolidated statement of comprehensive
income
Interest on lease liabilities
92.215.2
Variable lease payments not included in the measurement of lease
liabilities
0.6 -
Income from sub-leasing right of use assets
0.5 0.5
Expenses relating to short-term leases
3.2 0.6
Expenses relating to leases of low-value assets, excluding short-term
leases of low-value assets 0.4 0.2
The weighted average incremental borrowing cost applied to lease liabilities at 1 April 2025 was 7.32%
(1 April 2024: 7.02%). Total cash outflow for leases for the year ended 31 March 2026 was $164.4 million
(2025: $169.4 million).
(16.3) LEASES AS A LESSOR
The Group has receivables from operating leases relating to the lease of premises. The following table sets
out a maturity analysis of lease payments, showing the undiscounted lease payments to be received after
the reporting date.
2026
$Millions
2025
$Millions
Operating lease receivables as lessor
Between 0 to 1 year
29.8 26.0
Between 1 to 2 years
22.3 22.7
Between 2 to 5 years
34.4 36.3
More than 5 years27.2 33.3
Total undiscounted lease payments
113.7 118.3
73
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
(17) GOODWILL
2026
$Millions
2025
$Millions
Balance at beginning of the year4,682.0 4,677.0
Goodwill arising on acquisitions46.5 0.5
Goodwill disposed of during the year(61.9) -
Goodwill impaired during the year(0.2) -
Transfers to disposal group assets classified as held for sale - -
Fair value adjustments on finalisation of goodwill - (1.2)
Effects of movements in exchange rates60.1 5.7
Balance at the end of the year4,726.5 4,682.0
The aggregate carrying amounts of goodwill allocated to each
investment are as follows:
Manawa Energy - 61.9
Anytime Radiology103.1 -
One NZ2,880.4 2,880.1
Qscan Group727.3 659.0
RHCNZ Medical Imaging1,015.7 1,081.0
4,726.5 4,682.0
ANYTIME RADIOLOGY GROUP
During the period, the teleradiology businesses of RHCNZ and Qscan were transferred to Anytime
Radiology, as disclosed in Note 8.1, including associated goodwill of $103.1 million. This transfer resulted in
the recognition of a new single CGU for the purposes of goodwill impairment testing.
QSCAN GROUP
Cash Generating Units
Goodwill is allocated to a single consolidated cash-generating unit (CGU) within Qscan. The business
generates cash inflows through a single cohort of doctors operating across the entire network, and cash
flows cannot be separately identified by geography or individual clinics.
Impairment testing
Goodwill was tested for impairment at 31 March 2026 using a fair value less costs of disposal (FVLCD)
approach, being the higher of FVLCD and value in use (VIU).
The recoverable amount was determined using a discounted cash flow model based on portfolio company
board -approved forecasts over a five-year forecast period with a terminal value thereafter. Future cash flows
were discounted using a post-tax weighted average cost of capital (WACC) of 10.84% (31 March 2025:
11.13%). A terminal growth rate of 3.5% (31 March 2025: 3.5%) was applied.
Key assumptions underpinning the cash flow forecasts include historical revenue growth and EBITDA margins,
industry trends, new clinic growth and associated capital expenditure, strategic growth initiatives, and
execution of key operational strategies.
As the recoverable amount exceeded the carrying value, no impairment was recognised. Reasonably possible
changes in key assumptions underpinning the valuation models do not lead to impairment.
RHCNZ MEDICAL IMAGING
Cash Generating Units
Goodwill is allocated across the following cash-generating units within RHCNZ: Pacific Radiology (PRG),
Auckland Radiology (ARG), and Bay Radiology (BRL). Each CGU represents a separately identifiable
operational unit with distinct cash inflows.
Impairment testing
Goodwill was tested for impairment at 31 March 2026 using a value in use (VIU) approach.
The recoverable amounts were determined using discounted cash flow models based on portfolio company
board-approved forecasts over a ten-year forecast period with a terminal value thereafter. Future cash
flows were discounted using a pre-tax WACC of 9.7% (31 March 2025: 9.5%). A terminal growth rate of 3.5%
(31 March 2025: 3.5%) was applied.
Key assumptions underpinning the cash flow forecasts include revenue growth, EBITDA margins, WACC
and terminal growth.
As the recoverable amount exceeded the carrying value, no impairment was recognised. Reasonably
possible changes in key assumptions underpinning the valuation models do not lead to impairment.
ONE NZ
Cash Generating Units
Goodwill in One NZ Limited is allocated across the two separate cash-generating units of
Telecommunications and Fibre.
Impairment testing
Goodwill was tested for impairment at 31 March 2026 using a FVLCD approach, being the higher of
FVLCD and VIU.
The recoverable amounts were determined using discounted cash flow models based on portfolio company
board-approved forecasts over a ten-year forecast period with a terminal value thereafter. Future cash flows
were discounted using blended post-tax weighted average costs of capital (WACC) ranging from 7.9% to
8.2% (mid-point 8.1%) (31 March 2025: 7.8% - 8.2%, mid-point of 8.0%) for Telecommunications and from
7.1% to 7.5% (mid-point 7.3%) (31 March 2025: 7.0% - 7.4%, mid-point of 7.2%) for EonFibre. A terminal growth
rate of 2.25% (31 March 2025: 2.25%) was applied for both CGUs.
Key assumptions underpinning the cash flow forecasts include revenue growth, operating expense
forecasts, customer numbers and churn, capital expenditure, discount rates and terminal growth.
As the recoverable amount exceeded the carrying value, no impairment was recognised. Reasonably
possible changes in key assumptions underpinning the valuation models do not lead to impairment.
74
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
(18) INTANGIBLES
2026
Radio
spectrum
licences
$Millions
Software
$Millions
Construction
in progress
$Millions
Customer
contracts
$Millions
Brands
$Millions
Total
$Millions
Cost or valuation
Balance at beginning of the year145.1 336.0 56.6 443.4 169.1 1,150.2
Additions at cost - 33.5 58.4 - - 91.9
Additions on acquisition of subsidiary - - - - - -
Disposals - - - - - -
Disposal of subsidiary - (10.4) - (2.0) - (12.4)
Impairment - - - - - -
Transfers between categories - 59.3 (59.3) - - -
Transfers from property, plant and equipment - 0.1 (0.1) - - -
Transfers to assets classified as held for sale
- - - - - -
Transfer between cost and accumulated depreciation
0.3 (6.6)4.8 - 25.5 24.0
Effect of movements in exchange rates - - - 0.4 4.0 4.4
Balance at end of year145.4 411.9 60.4 441.8 198.6 1,258.1
Amortisation and impairment losses
Balance at beginning of the year(27.2)(180.0) - (121.0)(10.1)(338.3)
Amortisation for the year(17.0)(84.8) - (61.0)(7.9)(170.7)
Disposals - - - - - -
Disposal of subsidiary - 8.5 - 0.2 - 8.7
Impairment - - - - - -
Transfers - - - - - -
Transfer between cost and accumulated depreciation - (6.1) - - (17.8)(23.9)
Effect of movements in exchange rates - - - 0.2 - 0.2
Balance at end of year(44.2)(262.4) - (181.6)(35.8)(524.0)
Carrying value 31 March 2026101.2 149.5 60.4 260.2 162.8 734.1
75
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
(18) INTANGIBLES CONTINUED
2025
Radio
spectrum
licences
$Millions
Software
$Millions
Construction
in progress
$Millions
Customer
contracts
$Millions
Brands
$Millions
Total
$Millions
Cost or valuation
Balance at beginning of the year
125.1 234.5 41.8 441.3 168.7 1,011.4
Additions at cost
- 5.0 87.5 2.0 - 94.5
Additions on acquisition of subsidiary
20.0 - - - - 20.0
Disposals
- (0.1)(0.2) - - (0.3)
Impairment
- - - - - -
Transfers between categories
- 76.8 (76.8) - - -
Transfers from property, plant and equipment
- 19.8 4.3 - - 24.1
Effect of movements in exchange rates
- - - 0.1 0.4 0.5
Balance at end of year
145.1 336.0 56.6 443.4 169.1 1,150.2
Amortisation and impairment losses
Balance at beginning of the year
(10.6)(92.5) - (58.8)(4.6)(166.5)
Amortisation for the year
(16.6)(87.6) - (62.2)(5.5)(171.9)
Disposals
- 0.1 - - - 0.1
Impairment
- - - - - -
Transfers
- - - - - -
Effect of movements in exchange rates
- - - - - -
Balance at end of year
(27.2)(180.0) - (121.0)(10.1)(338.3)
Carrying value 31 March 2025
117.9 156.0 56.6 322.4 159.0 811.9
76
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
(19) LOANS AND BORROWINGS
This note provides information about the contractual terms of the Group’s interest bearing loans and
borrowings.
2026
$Millions
2025
$Millions
Current liabilities
Unsecured bank loans
- 94.1
Secured bank loans
400.2 17.5
less: Loan establishment costs capitalised and amortised over term
(3.2)(6.2)
397.0 105.4
Non-current liabilities
Unsecured bank loans
100.0 712.5
Secured bank loans
3,784.6 2,389.3
less: Loan establishment costs capitalised and amortised over term
(24.1)(19.6)
3,860.5 3,082.2
Facilities utilised at reporting date
Unsecured bank loans
100.0 806.6
Unsecured guarantees
- -
Secured bank loans
4,184.8 2,406.8
Secured guarantees
7.1 5.5
Facilities not utilised at reporting date
Unsecured bank loans
225.0 1,680.7
Unsecured guarantees
- -
Secured bank loans
1,385.3 510.8
Secured guarantees
- -
Facilities utilised at reporting date
Interest bearing loans and borrowings - current
397.0 105.4
Interest bearing loans and borrowings - non-current
3,860.5 3,082.2
Total interest bearing loans and borrowings
4,257.5 3,187.6
2026
$Millions
2025
$Millions
Maturity profile for bank facilities (excluding secured guarantees):
Between 0 to 1 year
482.1 373.3
Between 1 to 2 years
2,261.6 556.0
Between 2 to 5 years
3,053.5 4,421.1
Over 5 years
71.1 54.5
Total bank facilities
5,868.3 5,404.9
FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS
Wholly owned subsidiaries
Infratil Finance Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, has entered into bank facility
arrangements with a negative pledge agreement, which, with limited exceptions does not permit the Infratil
Guaranteeing Group (‘IGG’) to grant any security over its assets. The IGG comprises entities subject to a
cross guarantee and comprises Infratil Limited, Infratil Finance Limited and certain other wholly owned
subsidiaries. These facilities are primarily used to fund the corporate and investment activities of the
Company. The IGG does not incorporate the underlying assets of the Company’s non-wholly owned
subsidiaries and associates. The IGG bank facilities also include restrictions over the sale or disposal of
certain assets without bank agreement. Liability under the cross guarantee is limited to the amount of debt
drawn under the IGG facilities, plus any unpaid interest and costs of recovery.
At 31 March 2026 there was $1,637.5 million of drawn debt under the IGG facilities (31 March 2025:
$616.6 million) and undrawn IGG facilities totalled $855.3 million (31 March 2025: $1,365.7 million).
Non-wholly owned subsidiaries
The Group’s non-wholly owned subsidiaries also enter into bank facility arrangements. Amounts outstanding
under these facilities are included within loans and borrowings in the table above. Wellington International
Airport’s facilities are subject to negative pledge arrangements, which, with limited exceptions does not
permit those entities to grant security over their respective assets. One NZ, Qscan Group and RHCNZ
Medical Imaging borrow under syndicated bank debt facilities, under which security is granted over their
respective assets. All non-wholly owned subsidiary facilities are subject to restrictions over the sale or
disposal of certain assets without bank agreement.
The various bank facilities across the Group require the relevant borrowing group to operate within defined
performance and gearing ratios as is typical of debt facilities of this nature. Throughout the period the Group
has complied with all debt covenant requirements as imposed by the respective lenders.
Interest rates
Interest rates payable on bank loan facilities are floating rate determined by reference to prevailing money
market rates at the time of draw-down plus a margin. Interest rates paid during the year ranged from 3.30%
to 7.91% (31 March 2025: 4.64% to 8.98%).
77
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
(20) INFRATIL INFRASTRUCTURE BONDS
2026
$Millions
2025
$Millions
Balance at the beginning of the year1,633.1 1,464.9
Issued during the year
122.6 326.2
Exchanged during the year
(22.6)(76.2)
Matured during the year
(141.1)(80.0)
Purchased by Infratil during the year
- -
Bond issue costs capitalised during the year
(1.6)(3.9)
Bond issue costs amortised during the year
2.6 2.4
Issue premium amortised during the year
(0.3)(0.3)
Balance at the end of the year
1,592.7 1,633.1
Current
156.1 161.5
Non-current fixed coupon
1,081.5 1,117.6
Non-current variable coupon
123.2 122.1
Non-current perpetual variable coupon
231.9 231.9
Balance at the end of the year
1,592.7 1,633.1
2026
$Millions
2025
$Millions
Repayment terms and interest rates:
IFT250 maturing in June 2025, 6.15% p.a. fixed coupon rate
- 43.4
IFT270 maturing in December 2028, 6.78% p.a. fixed coupon rate
146.2 146.2
IFT280 maturing in December 2026, 3.35% p.a. fixed coupon rate
156.3 156.3
IFT300 maturing in March 2026, 3.35% p.a. fixed coupon rate
- 120.3
IFT310 maturing in December 2027, 3.60% p.a. fixed coupon rate
102.4 102.4
IFT320 maturing in June 2030, 5.93% p.a. fixed coupon rate until
June 2026
115.9 115.9
IFT330 maturing in July 2029, 6.90% p.a. fixed coupon rate
150.0 150.0
IFT340 maturing in March 2031, 7.08% p.a. fixed coupon rate
127.2 127.2
IFT350 maturing in December 2031, 7.06% p.a. fixed coupon rate
204.5 204.5
IFT360 maturing in December 2030, 6.00% p.a. fixed coupon rate
121.7 121.7
IFT370 maturing in June 2032, 6.16% p.a fixed coupon rate
122.6 -
IFTHC maturing in December 2029, 5.20% p.a. variable coupon rate,
reset annually
123.2 123.2
IFTHA Perpetual Infratil infrastructure bonds
231.9 231.9
less: issue costs capitalised and amortised over term
(9.2)(10.2)
add: issue premium capitalised and amortised over term
- 0.3
Balance at the end of the year
1,592.7 1,633.1
Fixed coupon
The fixed coupon bonds the Company has on issue are at a face value of $1.00 per bond. Interest is
payable quarterly on the bonds.
IFTHC bonds
The IFTHC bonds the Company has on issue are at a face value of $1.00 per bond. Interest is payable
quarterly on the bonds. The coupon for the IFTHC bonds for the 1-year period from (but excluding)
15 December 2025 was fixed at 5.20% per annum (for the 1-year period to 15 December 2025 the
coupon was 6.24%). Thereafter the rate will be reset annually at 2.50% per annum over the then one
year swap rate for quarterly payments.
78
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
IFT320 bonds
The interest rate of the IFT320 bonds is fixed at 5.93% for the first four years and will then reset on 15 June
2026 for a further four years. The interest rate for the IFT320 bonds for the period from (but excluding)
15 June 2026 until the maturity date will be the sum of the four year swap rate on 15 June 2026 plus a
margin of 2.00% per annum.
Perpetual Infratil infrastructure bonds (’PIIBs’)
The Company has 231,917,000 (31 March 2025: 231,917,000) PIIBs on issue at a face value of $1.00
per bond. Interest is payable quarterly on the bonds. On 15 November 2025 the coupon was set at 3.90%
per annum until the next reset date, being 15 November 2026 (2025: 5.15%). Thereafter the rate will be
reset annually at 1.50% per annum over the then one year swap rate for quarterly payments, unless Infratil's
gearing ratio exceeds certain thresholds, in which case the margin increases. These infrastructure bonds
have no fixed maturity date. No PIIBs (2025: nil) were repurchased by Infratil Limited during the year.
Throughout the year the Company complied with all debt covenant requirements as imposed by its bond
supervisor.
At 31 March 2026 Infratil Infrastructure bonds (including PIIBs) had a fair value of $1,545.2 million
(31 March 2025: $1,572.6 million).
(21) WELLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BONDS AND USPP NOTES
2026
$Millions
2025
$Millions
Repayment terms and interest rates:
WIA050 Retail bonds maturing June 2025, 5.00% p.a. fixed coupon rate
- 70.0
WIA060 Retail bonds maturing April 2030, 5.63% p.a. fixed coupon rate
100.0 100.0
WIA070 Retail bonds maturing August 2026, 2.50% p.a. fixed coupon rate
100.0 100.0
WIA080 Retail bonds maturing September 2031, 3.32% p.a. fixed coupon rate
124.8 123.9
WIA090 Retail bonds maturing August 2028, 5.78% p.a. fixed coupon rate
75.0 75.0
WIA100 Retail bonds maturing September 2030, 6.02% p.a. fixed coupon rate
100.0 100.0
WIA110 Retail bonds maturing April 2031, 5.09% p.a. fixed coupon rate
125.8 -
USPP Notes - Series A (US$36 million)
60.4 60.1
USPP Notes - Series B (US$36 million)
60.3 60.0
less: Issue costs capitalised and amortised over term
(2.6)(3.3)
Balance at the end of the year
743.7 685.7
Current
100.0 70.0
Non-current
643.7 615.7
Balance at the end of the year
743.7 685.7
The Trust Deed for the retail bonds requires Wellington International Airport (’Wellington Airport’) to operate
within defined performance and debt gearing ratios. The arrangements under the Trust Deed creates
restrictions over the sale or disposal of certain assets. Throughout the year Wellington Airport complied
with all debt covenant requirements as imposed by the retail bond supervisor.
Wellington Airport’s USPP comprised two equal tranches, Series A of US$36 million 10 year Note with a
coupon of 3.47%, maturing July 2027 and Series B of US$36 million 12 year Note with a coupon of 3.59%,
maturing July 2029. In conjunction with the USPP issuance, Wellington Airport entered into cross currency
interest rate swaps (’CCIRS’) to hedge the exposure to foreign currency risk over the term of the notes.
At 31 March 2026 Wellington Airport's bonds had a fair value of $634.5 million (2025: $580.0 million),
and Wellington Airport's USPP Notes had a fair value of $125.1 million (2025: $126.0 million).
The USPP notes are measured at amortised cost, translated to New Zealand dollars using the spot rate at
balance date.
As at 31 March 2026, included in Note 19, are Wellington International Airport's bank facilities amounting
to $325 million (31 March 2025: $200 million), with $110 million drawn (31 March 2025: $60 million).
These facilities and the US$72 million USPP Notes have certain financial covenants which were all met as
at 31 March 2026.
79
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
(22) FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT
This note provides information about the Group’s financial instruments and its exposure to financial risks,
including credit risk, liquidity risk and market risk. These risks are managed in accordance with the Group's
treasury and risk management policies, with oversight from management and the Audit and Risk
Committee. The following sections describe the Group’s exposure to each financial risk, the policies and
processes used to manage those risks, the fair value of financial instruments and the Group’s approach
to capital management.
(22.1) CREDIT RISK
Credit risk is the risk that a counterparty will default on its contractual obligations, resulting in financial loss
to the Group. The Group is exposed to credit risk in the normal course of business including those arising
from trade receivables with its customers, financial derivatives and transactions (including cash balances)
with financial institutions. The Group minimises its exposure to credit risk of trade receivables through the
adoption of counterparty credit limits and standard payment terms. Derivative counterparties and cash
transactions are limited to high-credit-quality financial institutions and organisations in the relevant industry.
The Group’s exposure and the credit ratings of significant counterparties are monitored, and the aggregate
value of exposures are spread across approved counterparties. The carrying amounts of financial assets
recognised in the Statement of Financial Position best represent the Group’s maximum exposure to credit
risk at the reporting date. Generally no security is held on these amounts.
Cash and cash equivalents
2026
$Millions
2025
$Millions
The Group had exposure to credit risk with financial institutions at
balance date from cash deposits held as follows:
Financial institutions with ’AA’ credit ratings
- -
Financial institutions with ’AA-’ credit ratings
259.0 244.2
Financial institutions with ’A+’ credit ratings
28.3 28.3
Financial institutions with ’A’ credit ratings
0.3 0.1
Unrated financial institutions
25.0 21.1
Total cash deposits with financial institutions
312.6 293.7
Cash on hand
- -
Total Cash and cash equivalents
312.6 293.7
No cash was included in assets held for sale at 31 March 2026 (31 March 2025: nil). Credit ratings are from
S&P Global Ratings or equivalent rating agencies.
Trade and other receivables
The Group has exposure to various counterparties. Concentration of credit risk with respect to trade and
other receivables is limited due to the Group’s large customer base in a diverse range of industries and
geographies.
Ageing of trade receivables
2026
$Millions
2025
$Millions
The ageing analysis of trade receivables is as follows:
Not past due
248.2 204.5
Past due 0-30 days
39.3 36.8
Past due 31-90 days
9.1 6.6
Greater than 90 days
16.0 17.0
Total
312.6 264.9
The ageing analysis of impaired trade receivables is as follows:
Not past due
(2.0)(2.4)
Past due 0-30 days
(0.9)(1.3)
Past due 31-90 days
(0.8)(1.2)
Greater than 90 days
(6.3)(10.0)
Total
(10.0)(14.9)
Movement in the provision for expected credit loss for the year
was as follows:
Balance as at 1 April
14.9 15.5
Acquired through acquisition of subsidiary
(1.3)(0.9)
Expected credit loss recognised (charged to operating expenses)
(14.1)10.0
Bad debts recovered
(6.0)3.4
Provisions made/(utilised)
17.1 (13.1)
Disposed through disposal of subsidiary
(0.6) -
Balance as at 31 March
10.0 14.9
Other prepayments and receivables
325.5 295.2
Total Trade, accounts receivable and prepayments
628.1 545.2
80
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
(22.2) LIQUIDITY RISK
Liquidity risk is the risk that the Group cannot meet its contracted cash flow obligations as they fall due. The
Group monitors liquidity risk by forecasting cash flows and assessing the maturity profile of its financial
assets, liabilities and funding facilities.
The Group’s approach is to maintain sufficient liquidity to meet its obligations under both normal and stress
conditions, without incurring unacceptable losses or risking damage to the Group’s reputation. This is
supported by maintaining sufficient cash and committed credit facilities, managing the spread of debt
maturities, and maintaining access to capital markets as required.
The Group also manages maturity concentration by regularly assessing its funding maturity profile and
maintaining aggregate maturities within acceptable limits. Refinancing discussions for debt facilities
typically commence at least six months before maturity. Facilities are maintained with highly rated financial
institutions and across a diversified group of bank counterparties.
The tables below analyses the Group's financial liabilities, excluding gross settled derivative financial
liabilities and deferred tax, into relevant maturity groupings based on the earliest possible contractual
maturity date at year end. The amounts in the tables below are contractual undiscounted cash flows, which
include interest through to maturity. Perpetual Infratil Infrastructure Bonds interest cash flows have been
determined by reference to the longest dated Infratil bond maturity in the year 2032. Contractual cash flows
exclude liabilities held for sale at 31 March 2026.
Contractual cash flows
31 March 2026
Balance
sheet
$Millions
Contractual
cash flows
$Millions
6 months
or less
$Millions
6 to 12
months
$Millions
1 to 2
years
$Millions
2 to 5
years
$Millions
5 +
years
$Millions
Accounts payable, accruals and other liabilities 1,103.0 1,073.7 780.6 44.5 170.5 38.2 39.9
Deferred payments for associates591.7591.7189.4262.4 139.9 - -
Lease liabilities 1,325.2 2,298.1 86.4 86.3 165.2 445.9 1,514.3
Unsecured & secured bank facilities 4,257.5 4,773.6209.0351.21,532.32,593.587.6
Infratil Infrastructure bonds 1,360.8 1,707.1 40.4 195.4 177.0 947.0 347.3
Perpetual Infratil Infrastructure bonds 231.9 56.4 4.5 4.5 9.0 27.1 11.3
Wellington International Airport bonds 743.7 897.8 116.8 16.8 95.5 412.2 256.5
Derivative financial instruments 27.7 43.8 17.5 8.2 6.5 12.9 (1.3)
9,641.511,442.21,444.6969.32,295.94,476.82,255.6
31 March 2025
Accounts payable, accruals and other liabilities 1,244.0 1,133.9 705.8 47.4 188.6 117.4 74.7
Lease liabilities 1,169.5 2,013.7 76.2 75.7 153.9 367.8 1,340.1
Unsecured & secured bank facilities 3,187.6 3,586.1147.4 70.1856.22,512.4 -
Infratil Infrastructure bonds 1,401.2 1,602.7 80.8 156.8 220.3 540.5 604.3
Perpetual Infratil Infrastructure bonds 231.9 85.76.4 6.4 12.8 38.3 21.8
Wellington International Airport bonds 685.7 837.1 85.4 13.6 127.3 269.9 340.9
Manawa Energy bonds 373.4 413.2 8.1 8.1 397.0 - -
Derivative financial instruments 367.1 431.6224.453.4115.029.0 9.8
8,660.4 10,104.0 1,334.5431.52,071.13,875.3 2,391.6
81
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
(22.3) MARKET RISK
Market risk is the risk that changes in market prices, such as interest rates and foreign exchange rates, will
affect the Group’s income or the value of its holdings of financial assets and liabilities. The objective of
market risk management is to manage and control market risk exposures within acceptable parameters,
while minimising the volatility in the Group's NZD cashflows.
(22.3.1) Interest rate risk (cash flow and fair value)
Interest rate risk is the risk of interest rate volatility negatively affecting the Group's interest expense cash
flow and earnings. Infratil mitigates this risk by managing it's interest rate exposures in accordance with the
Group's treasury policies, which sets out defined maximum and minimum hedging levels that are maintained
as a proportion of forecast total drawn debt. Infratil achieves compliance with these thresholds by issuing
fixed rate bonds or entering into interest rate derivatives to adjust its fixed rate exposure profile. Borrowings
issued at fixed rates expose the Group to fair value interest rate risk.
2026
$Millions
2025
$Millions
At balance date the face value of interest rate contracts outstanding
were:
Interest rate swaps - notional value
4,783.6 5,402.9
Fair value of interest rate swaps
14.6 (10.7)
Fair value adjustments
9.4 (13.2)
Cross currency interest rate swaps - notional value
99.8 99.8
Fair value of cross currency interest rate swaps
20.8 20.2
The termination dates for the interest rate swaps are as follows:
Between 0 to 1 year
370.0 1,175.9
Between 1 to 2 years
869.8 795.0
Between 2 to 5 years
2,618.9 2,096.0
Over 5 years
925.0 1,336.0
The termination dates for the cross currency interest rate swaps are
as follows:
Between 0 to 1 year
- -
Between 1 to 2 years
49.9 -
Between 2 to 5 years
49.9 99.8
Over 5 years
- -
Interest rate sensitivity analysis
The following table shows the impact on post-tax profit and equity of a movement in bank interest rates of
100 basis points higher/lower with all other variables held constant.
2026
$Millions
2025
$Millions
Profit or loss
100 bp increase
6.3 25.1
100 bp decrease
(8.5)(27.4)
Other comprehensive income
100 bp increase
47.4 36.0
100 bp decrease
(49.7)(35.7)
Assumptions used in the interest rate sensitivity analysis include:
Reasonably possible movements in interest rates were determined based on a review of historical
movements. A movement of 100 basis points higher/lower is considered appropriate to demonstrate the
sensitivity of the Group to movements in interest rates. The sensitivity was calculated by taking interest rate
instruments including loans and borrowings, bonds, interest rate swaps and cross currency interest rate
swaps at balance date and adjusting the interest rate upwards and downwards to quantify the resulting
impact to profit or loss and other comprehensive income.
82
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
(22.3.2) Foreign currency risk
The Group has exposure to foreign currency risk on the value of its net investment in foreign investments,
assets and liabilities, future investment obligations and future income. Decisions to enter into forward cover
for foreign currency cash flows are recognised once the underlying cash flows are expected to occur.
Decisions on buying forward cover to hold against foreign currency investments are subject to the Group’s
expectations of the fair value of the relevant exchange rate.
The Group may enter into forward exchange contracts to reduce the risk from price fluctuations of foreign
currency commitments and to hedge the risk of its net investment in foreign operations. Any resulting
differential to be paid or received as a result of the currency hedging of the asset is reflected in the final cost
of the asset.
The following table shows the impact on post-tax profit and equity if the New Zealand dollar had weakened
or strengthened by 10% against the currencies with which the Group has foreign currency risk with, all other
variables held constant.
20262025
+ 10%
$Millions
- 10%
$Millions
+ 10%
$Millions
- 10%
$Millions
Profit or loss
AUD
(8.4)8.4 (11.8) 11.8
EUR
(1.6)1.5 (2.0) 2.0
GBP
-- - -
USD
1.9 (2.4)(0.3) 0.3
Other comprehensive income
AUD
(282.8)282.8 (197.6) 197.6
EUR
0.1 (0.2)(12.8) 15.4
GBP
(10.5)10.5 (10.5) 10.5
USD
(34.7)39.3(49.6)52.1
Assumptions used in the foreign currency exposure sensitivity analysis include:
Reasonably possible movements in foreign exchange rates were determined based on a review of historical
movements. A movement of plus or minus 10% has been applied to the NZD/AUD, NZD/USD, NZD/EUR
and NZD/GBP exchange rates to demonstrate the sensitivity of foreign currency risk of the company’s
investment in foreign operations and associated derivative financial instruments. The sensitivity was
calculated by taking each currency pair's spot rate as at balance date, moving this spot rate by plus and
minus 10% and then reconverting the foreign currency balances with the ‘new spot-rate’.
Unhedged foreign currency exposures
At balance date the Group has the following unhedged exposure to foreign currency risk arising on foreign
currency monetary assets and liabilities that fall due within the next twelve months:
2026
$Millions
2025
$Millions
Cash, short term deposits and trade receivables
United States Dollars (USD)
1.6 3.8
Australian Dollars (AUD)
2.9 48.9
Euro (EUR)
1.0 2.0
Pound Sterling (GBP)
0.7 0.1
Bank overdraft, bank debt and accounts payable
United States Dollars (USD)
0.1 -
Australian Dollars (AUD)
1.1 1.2
83
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
(22.4) FAIR VALUE OF DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
In certain circumstances, the Group uses derivatives to manage exposure to market risks. These derivatives
are measured and disclosed at fair value. The carrying values of derivative financial assets and liabilities
recognised in the statement of financial position are set out below:
Assets
2026
$Millions
2025
$Millions
Derivative financial instruments - energy - 114.3
Derivative financial instruments - cross currency interest rate swaps
20.8 20.2
Derivative financial instruments - foreign exchange
4.1 3.3
Derivative financial instruments - interest rate
36.0 35.9
60.9 173.7
Split as follows:
Current
6.6 80.5
Non-current
54.3 93.2
60.9 173.7
Liabilities
Derivative financial instruments - energy - 298.5
Derivative financial instruments - cross currency interest rate swaps
- -
Derivative financial instruments - foreign exchange
6.3 22.0
Derivative financial instruments - interest rate
21.4 46.6
27.7 367.1
Split as follows:
Current
14.1 132.4
Non-current
13.6 234.7
27.7 367.1
Determination of fair value
The fair value of derivative financial instruments is determined using quoted market prices where available.
Where quoted prices are not available, fair value is estimated using discounted cash flow analysis, based on
the applicable yield curve or available forward price data for the term of the instrument.
For derivatives valued using discounted cash flow analysis, the key valuation inputs are:
• forward price curve (for the relevant underlying interest rates, foreign exchange rates or commodity
prices); and.
• discount rates.
The selection of valuation inputs requires judgement. As a result, a range of reasonably possible assumptions
could be used to estimate the fair value of these derivatives. The Group maximises the use of observable
market data when selecting inputs and developing assumptions for valuation techniques.
A summary of common valuation inputs and their sources is set out below:
Valuation inputSource
Interest rate forward price curvePublished market swap rates
Foreign exchange forward pricesPublished spot foreign exchange rates
Electricity forward price curveMarket quoted prices where available and
management’s best estimate based on
its view of the long run marginal cost of new
generation where no market quoted prices are
available
Discount rate for valuing interest rate derivativesPublished market interest rates as applicable to
the remaining life of the instrument
Discount rate for valuing forward foreign exchange
contracts
Published market rates as applicable to the
remaining life of the instrument
The selection of variables requires significant judgement and therefore there is a range of reasonably
possible assumptions in respect of these variables that could be used in estimating the fair value of these
derivatives. Maximum use is made of observable market data when selecting variables and developing
assumptions for the valuation techniques.
84
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
Fair value hierarchy
The table below analyses financial instruments carried at fair value, by valuation method. The different levels
have been defined as follows:
• Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (level 1)
• Inputs other than quoted prices included within level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either
directly (that is, as prices) or indirectly (that is, derived from prices) (level 2)
• Inputs for the asset or liability that are not based on observable market data (that is, unobservable inputs)
(level 3).
The following tables present the Group’s financial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value.
31 March 2026
Level 1
$Millions
Level 2
$Millions
Level 3
$Millions
Total
$Millions
Assets per the statement of financial position
Derivative financial instruments - energy - - - -
Derivative financial instruments - cross currency
interest rate swaps - 20.8 - 20.8
Derivative financial instruments - foreign exchange1.8 2.3 - 4.1
Derivative financial instruments - interest rate4.9 31.1 - 36.0
Total6.7 54.2 - 60.9
Liabilities per the statement of financial position
Derivative financial instruments - energy - - - -
Derivative financial instruments - cross currency
interest rate swaps - - - -
Derivative financial instruments - foreign exchange - 6.3 - 6.3
Derivative financial instruments - interest rate - 21.4 - 21.4
Total - 27.7 - 27.7
31 March 2025
Level 1
$Millions
Level 2
$Millions
Level 3
$Millions
Total
$Millions
Assets per the statement of financial position
Derivative financial instruments - energy - - 114.3 114.3
Derivative financial instruments - cross currency
interest rate swaps - 20.2 - 20.2
Derivative financial instruments - foreign exchange0.2 3.1 - 3.3
Derivative financial instruments - interest rate0.4 35.5 - 35.9
Total0.6 58.8 114.3 173.7
Liabilities per the statement of financial position
Derivative financial instruments - energy - - 298.5 298.5
Derivative financial instruments - cross currency
interest rate swaps
- - - -
Derivative financial instruments - foreign exchange - 22.0 - 22.0
Derivative financial instruments - interest rate0.3 46.3 - 46.6
Total0.3 68.3 298.5 367.1
There were no transfers between derivative financial instrument assets or liabilities classified as level 1 or
level 2, and level 3 of the fair value hierarchy during the year ended 31 March 2026 (31 March 2025: none).
85
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
(23) CLIMATE RISK ASSESSMENT AND MITIGATION
Infratil recognises the importance of assessing and managing climate-related risks. As a responsible investor
in infrastructure assets, Infratil acknowledges the potential impacts of climate change on its portfolio and is
committed to taking proactive measures to address these risks.
Assessment of Climate Risks
Infratil has conducted an assessment of climate-related risks, considering both physical risks and transition
risks associated with climate change.
As of 1 April 2023, the Group is a Climate Reporting Entity for the purpose of the Financial Markets Conduct
Act 2013 (‘FMCA’). On 31 July 2025, Infratil released its mandatory Climate Related Disclosures, covering
the FY2025 period. Further information on the Group’s response to climate-related risks and disclosures is
available here https://infratil.com/for-investors/reports-results-meetings-investor-days/#sustainability-
reports-page. Infratil will release its FY2026 mandatory Climate Risk Disclosure report by 31 July 2026.
The Group reviews its investments against independent external valuation reports to determine whether
there is any indication that those assets have suffered an impairment loss. Independent external valuations
also form the basis for the International Portfolio Incentive Fees paid to Morrison annually. The valuers have
considered the impact of climate change on the investments but have made no explicit adjustments in
respect of climate change matters. However, the Group and valuers anticipate that climate change could
have a greater influence on valuations in the future as investment markets place a greater emphasis on this
topic.
(24) CAPITAL COMMITMENTS
2026
$Millions
2025
$Millions
Group capital commitments
Committed but not contracted for
55.8 31.6
Contracted but not provided for
299.4 226.3
Capital commitments
355.2 257.9
Group capital commitments are primarily associated with RHCNZ Medical Imaging's capital expenditure in
relation to completion costs for new branches and branch expansion, Qscan and One NZ's open capital
expenditure purchase orders and Gurin Energy's expenditure on new battery energy storage systems.
Infratil capital commitments
Capital commitments from Infratil are primarily associated with Infratil’s capital contributions to development
phase subsidiaries and associates. Total committed capital by Infratil and total uncalled commitment to date
is designated in the entity’s local currency.
Local currency
Total
commitment at
31 March 2026
$Millions
Uncalled
commitment at
31 March 2026
$Millions
Uncalled
commitment at
31 March 2026
(NZD) $Millions
Longroad EnergyUSD757.8 338.3 588.6
GalileoEUR114.0 - -
Gurīn EnergyUSD237.5 76.5 133.1
Kao DataGBP355.9 81.3 187.1
Mint Renewables AUD219.0 186.0 223.3
ClearvisionUSD100.0 31.9 55.4
Total 1,187.5
The uncalled commitment at 31 March 2025: $834.5 million. Infratil’s shareholding allows it to control
the timing and quantum of any capital call.
Subsequent to balance date, on 9 April 2026, Infratil committed to an additional €20.0 million in
shareholder loans to Galileo Green Energy.
86
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
(25) RECONCILIATION OF NET SURPLUS WITH CASH FLOW FROM
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
2026
$Millions
2025
$Millions
Net surplus for the year574.3(269.8)
(Add)/Less items classified as investing activity:
(Gain)/Loss on investment realisations, impairments and disposals
of discontinued operations
(186.7)81.9
Payables relating to investing activities
0.6 0.1
Add items not involving cash flows:
Movement in financial derivatives taken to the profit or loss
(41.2)69.4
Decrease in deferred tax liability excluding transfers to reserves
(136.5)(53.1)
Changes in fair value of investment properties
10.6 24.9
Equity accounted earnings of associate net of distributions received
(436.8)(458.9)
Depreciation
415.5 453.0
Movement in provision for bad debts
5.9 15.0
Amortisation of intangibles
170.7 171.9
Other
50.937.4
Movements in working capital:
Change in receivables
(82.1)62.7
Change in inventories
10.0 5.9
Change in trade payables
15.6 (68.0)
Change in accruals and other liabilities
(129.8)274.1
Change in current and deferred taxation
(46.0)39.9
Net cash flow from operating activities
195.0 386.4
87
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
(26) RECONCILIATION OF CASH FLOW FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
LiabilitiesEquity
Interest bearing
loans and
borrowings
$Millions
Bonds
$Millions
Lease
liabilities
$Millions
Derivative
financial
instruments
$Millions
Share
Capital
$Millions
Reserves
$Millions
Retained
earnings
$Millions
Non-controlling
interest in
subsidiaries
$Millions
Total
$Millions
Balance as at 1 April 2025(3,187.6)(2,692.2)(1,169.5)(367.1)(3,409.2)(946.2)(2,171.8)(1,553.7)(15,497.3)
Changes from financing cash flows -
Proceeds from issue of shares and shareholder loans - - - - - - - - -
Proceeds from issues of shares to non-controlling interest - - - - - - - (89.6)(89.6)
Bank borrowings(2,592.8) - - - - - - - (2,592.8)
Issue of bonds - (225.0) - - - - - - (225.0)
Repayment of bank debt/commercial paper1,445.9 - - - - - - - 1,445.9
Repayment of lease liabilities - - 91.3 - - - - - 91.3
Lease incentives received - - (42.0) - - - - - (42.0)
Loan establishment costs3.0 - - - - - - - 3.0
Repayment of bonds/PIIB buyback - 211.3 - - - - - - 211.3
Infrastructure bond issue expenses - 1.6 - - - - - - 1.6
Share buyback - - - - - - - - -
Share buyback of non-wholly owned subsidiaries - - - - - - - 108.7 108.7
Dividends paid to non-controlling shareholders in subsidiary companies - - - - - - - 56.9 56.9
Dividends paid to owners of the Company - - - - (63.2) - 201.6 - 138.4
Total changes from financing cash flows(1,143.9)(12.1)49.3 - (63.2) - 201.6 76.0 (892.3)
Changes arising from acquisition or disposal of subsidiaries 129.6 373.5 9.5 87.9 7.2 319.0 (319.0)667.4 1,275.1
The effect of changes in foreign exchange rates(41.2) - (6.9)(1.0) - (352.7) - - (401.8)
Changes in fair value - - - 252.5 - (142.6) - (31.8)78.1
Liability-related -
Lease additions/(disposals) - - (236.1) - - - - - (236.1)
Capitalised borrowing costs0.3 (5.6) - - - - - - (5.3)
Interest expense(0.2) - (87.2) - - - - - (87.4)
Other(14.5) - 115.7 - - - - - 101.2
Total liability-related other changes(14.4)(5.6)(207.6) - - - - - (227.6)
Total equity-related other changes - - - - (298.4)46.2(548.1)(9.8)(810.1)
Balance at 31 March 2026(4,257.5)(2,336.4)(1,325.2)(27.7)(3,763.6)(1,076.3)(2,837.3)(851.9)(16,475.9)
88
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
LiabilitiesEquity
Interest bearing
loans and
borrowings
$Millions
Bonds
$Millions
Lease
liabilities
$Millions
Derivative
financial
instruments
$Millions
Share
Capital
$Millions
Reserves
$Millions
Retained
earnings
$Millions
Non-controlling
interest in
subsidiaries
$Millions
Total
$Millions
Balance as at 1 April 2024(3,138.9)(2,569.5)(1,149.4)(149.6)(2,043.9)(811.1)(2,646.3)(1,548.4)(14,057.1)
Changes from financing cash flows -
Proceeds from issue of shares and shareholder loans - - - - (1,258.8) - - - (1,258.8)
Proceeds from issues of shares to non-controlling interest - - - - - - - (38.5)(38.5)
Bank borrowings(2,034.2) - - - - - - - (2,034.2)
Issue of bonds - (250.0) - - - - - - (250.0)
Repayment of bank debt/commercial paper2,007.7 - - - - - - - 2,007.7
Repayment of lease liabilities - - 105.3 - - - - - 105.3
Lease incentives received - - - - - - - - -
Loan establishment costs32.1 - - - - - - - 32.1
Repayment of bonds/PIIB buyback - 140.0 - - - - - - 140.0
Infrastructure bond issue expenses - 4.0 - - - - - - 4.0
Share buyback - - - - - - - - -
Share buyback of non-wholly owned subsidiaries - - - - - - - 45.5 45.5
Dividends paid to non-controlling shareholders in subsidiary companies - - - - - - - 66.3 66.3
Dividends paid to owners of the Company - - - - (56.5) - 178.9 - 122.4
Total changes from financing cash flows5.6 (106.0)105.3 - (1,315.3) - 178.9 73.3 (1,058.2)
Changes arising from acquisition or disposal of subsidiaries - - - - - - - - -
The effect of changes in foreign exchange rates(10.6)(0.3)(1.6)(3.1) - (77.8) - (1.1)(94.5)
Changes in fair value - (13.6) - (231.8) - (124.5) - (89.6)(459.5)
Liability-related -
Lease additions/(disposals) - - (103.8) - - - - - (103.8)
Capitalised borrowing costs(32.4)(2.8) - - - - - - (35.2)
Interest expense(1.8) - (15.6)(0.2) - - - - (17.6)
Other(9.5) - (4.4)17.6 - - - - 3.7
Total liability-related other changes(43.7)(2.8)(123.8)17.4 - - - - (152.9)
Total equity-related other changes - - - - (50.0)67.2 295.6 12.1 324.9
Balance at 31 March 2025(3,187.6)(2,692.2)(1,169.5)(367.1)(3,409.2)(946.2)(2,171.8)(1,553.7)(15,497.3)
89
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
(27) KEY MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL DISCLOSURES
Key management personnel have been defined as the Chief Executives and direct reports for the Group’s
operating subsidiaries (including executive Directors).
2026
$Millions
2025
$Millions
Key management personnel remuneration comprised:
Short-term employee benefits
33.4 26.9
Post employment benefits
- -
Termination benefits
1.0 1.3
Other long-term benefits
6.0 8.5
Share based payments
1.2 (0.5)
41.6 36.2
Directors fees paid to directors of Infratil Limited and its subsidiaries during the year were $4.5 million
(2025: $5.0 million).
(28) RELATED PARTIES
Morrison Infrastructure Management Limited ('Morrison') is the management company for the Company
and receives management fees in accordance with the applicable management agreement. Morrison is
owned by H.R.L Morrison & Co Group Limited Partnership, in which Jason Boyes, a director and Chief
Executive of Infratil, has a beneficial interest.
The passive mobile tower assets sold by One NZ to Fortysouth during the year ended 31 March 2023 have
been leased back to One NZ as part of the 20-year master service agreement. Following the One NZ
acquisition, the right-of-use asset and lease liability attributable to agreements with Fortysouth are held on
the Balance Sheet at $778.3 million and $827.0 million, respectively. Additionally, interest expense was
$66.5 million and right-of-use asset depreciation was $45.9 million for the 12 months to 31 March 2026
within the Statement of Comprehensive Income. The Group’s share of the operating revenue for Fortysouth
is included within share of associate earnings line in the Statement of Comprehensive Income. Infratil has
deemed that any unrealised gains or losses for transactions between One NZ and Fortysouth are not
material and will not be eliminated.
There are other related party transactions between companies within the Group. These are carried out in the
ordinary course of business at the appropriate market rate. The arrangements are not deemed material for
separate disclosure.
Management and other fees paid by the Group (including associates) to Mo
rrison or its related
parties during the year were:
Note
2026
$Millions
2025
$Millions
Management fees29 101.4 456.2
Executive secondment and consulting0.6 0.1
Directors’ fees2.0 2.8
Directors' fees rebate(1.7) -
Financial management, accounting, treasury,
compliance and administrative services0.2 1.6
Other0.9 0.2
Total management and other fees103.4 460.9
As at 31 March 2026 $0.1 million included in the above table related to discontinued operations
(2025: $0.3 million).
At 31 March 2026 amounts owing to Morrison of $10.8 million (excluding GST) are included in trade
creditors (2025: $9.1 million).
Morrison, or Employees of Morrison received directors fees from the Company, subsidiaries or
associates as follows:
2026
$000’s
2025
$000’s
CDC354.2 309.1
Galileo 414.4 380.5
Gurīn Energy383.2 380.7
Infratil Infrastructure Property30.0 15.0
Longroad Energy 255.4 287.6
RHCNZ Medical Imaging100.0 120.0
Manawa Energy 83.4 310.0
Mint Renewables - 203.6
RetireAustralia - 341.0
Wellington International Airport342.7 463.5
1,963.3 2,811.0
A loan has been provided to the co-investor of Gurīn Energy. Given this entity represents the key
management personnel of Gurīn Energy, it has been identified as a related party loan. The loan balance at
31 March 2026 is $18.5 million (31 March 2025: $11.5 million) and is included within trade and other
receivables at 31 March 2026.
90
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
(29) MANAGEMENT FEES PAID UNDER THE MANAGEMENT
AGREEMENT WITH MORRISON INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEMENT
LIMITED
The day-to-day management responsibilities of the Company have been delegated to Morrison
Infrastructure Management Limited (’Morrison’) under a Management Agreement. The Management
Agreement specifies the duties and powers of Morrison, and the management fees payable to Morrison for
delivering those services. These include a New Zealand Portfolio Management Fee, International Portfolio
Management Fee and International Portfolio Incentive Fees.
Management fees paid under the Management Agreement during the year were:
2026
$Millions
2025
$Millions
New Zealand & International Portfolio Management Fees122.6 109.3
International Portfolio Incentive Fees
(21.2)346.9
101.4 456.2
New Zealand Portfolio Management Fee
The New Zealand base management fee is paid on the 'New Zealand Company Value' at 0.80% p.a. on
the New Zealand Company Value above $150 million, 1.00% p.a. on the New Zealand Company Value
between $50 million and $150 million and 1.125% p.a. on New Zealand Company value up to $50 million.
The New Zealand Company Value is defined as:
• the Company's market capitalisation as defined in the Management Agreement (the aggregated market
value of the Company's listed securities, being ordinary shares, partly paid shares and, Infratil
Infrastructure bonds);
• plus the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries' net debt (excluding listed debt securities and the
book value of the debt in any non-Australasian investments);
• minus the cost price of any non-Australasian investments; and,
• an adjustment for foreign exchange gains or losses related to non-New Zealand investments.
International Portfolio Management Fee
The international fund management fee is paid at the rate of 1.50% per annum on:
• the cost price of any non-Australasian investments; and,
• the book value of the debt in any wholly owned non-Australasian investments.
International Portfolio Incentive Fee
International Investments are eligible for International Portfolio incentive fees (‘Incentive fees’) under the
Management Agreement between Morrison and Infratil. The Agreement allows for incentives to be payable
for performance in excess of a minimum hurdle of 12% per annum in three separate areas:
• Initial Incentive Fees;
• Annual Incentive Fees; and,
• Realised Incentive Fees.
To the extent that there are assets that meet these criterion, independent valuations are performed on the
respective International Investments to determine whether any Incentive Fees are payable.
International Portfolio Initial Incentive Fee
International Investments become eligible for the Initial Incentive Fee assessment on the third balance
date (31 March) that they have been held continuously by the Company. All International Investments
that are acquired in any one financial year are grouped together for the purposes of the Initial Incentive
Fee, and an Initial Incentive Fee is payable at 20% of the outperformance of those assets against a
benchmark of 12% p.a. after tax, compounding.
There are no International Portfolio Initial Incentive Fee assessments as at 31 March 2026 (31 March 2025:
($0.5) million from Mint Renewables).
International Portfolio Annual Incentive Fee
Thereafter International Investments are grouped together, and an Annual Incentive Fee is payable at 20% of
the outperformance of those assets against the higher of, a benchmark of 12% p.a. after tax, relative to the
most recent 31 March valuation, or cost.
The Company’s investments in CDC, Galileo, Gurīn Energy, Kao Data, Longroad Energy, Mint Renewables
and Qscan Group are eligible for the International Portfolio Annual Incentive fee assessment as at 31 March
2026 (31 March 2025: CDC, Galileo, Gurīn Energy, Kao Data, Longroad Energy, RetireAustralia and Qscan).
Based on independent valuations obtained as at 31 March 2026, no Annual Incentive Fee was accrued
(31 March 2025: $347.4 million).
International Portfolio Annual and Initial Incentive Fees
2026
$Millions
2025
$Millions
CDC - 359.9
Galileo - 2.4
Gurīn Energy - 29.9
Kao Data - (3.5)
Longroad Energy - (25.2)
Qscan - 3.7
RetireAustralia - (19.8)
Mint Renewables - (0.5)
- 346.9
Payment of Annual Incentive Fees
Any Annual Incentive Fee calculated in respect of a Financial Year is earned and paid in three annual
instalments, with the second and third instalments being scaled down if the fair value of the relevant asset
(including distributions, if any) is less than fair value or cost as at the 31 March for which the Incentive Fee
was first calculated.
91
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
International Portfolio Realised Incentive Fee
Realised Incentive Fees are payable on the realised gains from the sale, or other realisation of International
Investments at 20% of the outperformance (since the last valuation date) against the higher of, a benchmark
of 12% p.a. after tax, relative to the most recent 31 March valuation, or cost.
As at 31 March 2026, the International Portfolio realised incentive fee was negative $21.2 million as a result
of the transaction price of the RetireAustralia sale. The realised negative fee will be offset against Tranche 2
of the FY2025 annual incentive fee payment (31 March 2025: nil).
(30) CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
The Company and certain wholly owned subsidiaries are guarantors of the bank debt facilities of Infratil
Finance Limited under a Deed of Negative Pledge, Guarantee and Subordination and the Company is a
guarantor to certain obligations of subsidiary companies.
(31) EVENTS AFTER BALANCE DATE
Dividend
On 25 May 2026, the Directors approved an unimputed final dividend of 13.65 cents per share to holders of
fully paid ordinary shares to be paid on 29 June 2026.
Fortysouth
As outlined in Note 9.4, the sale of Fortysouth was announced on 10 November 2025, with completion
subject to the Overseas Investment Office approval. Accordingly, the investment in Fortysouth was classified
as held for sale as at 31 March 2026. The sale completed on 10 April 2026, with final sale proceeds of
$217.1 million received on that date. Infratil will recognise the disposal of the investment on completion,
with sale proceeds (net of transaction costs) in excess of the carrying value recognised as a gain on sale,
expected to be approximately $40.0 million which will be recognised in the year ended 31 March 2027.
Infratil Finance Limited Refinancing
Subsequent to 31 March 2026, Infratil Finance Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company,
completed a refinancing of its core bank debt facilities as part of a broader reset of the Group’s debt
platform.
Under the refinancing, total committed bank facilities increased from those balance outlined in Note 19
to approximately $2.1 billion, comprising approximately $1.6 billion of syndicated bank facilities and
$0.5 billion of bilateral facilities.
The new facilities introduce a more flexible covenant and legal structure consistent with the Group’s
investment grade credit profile and extend the Group’s debt maturity profile through a combination of 1-year
(plus 1-year extension), 3-year and 5-year tenors across facilities denominated in NZD, AUD and USD.
This refinancing is a non-adjusting event after the reporting period and does not result in any adjustment to
the amounts recognised in the financial statements at 31 March 2026.
Reduction in Contact stake
On 20 May 2026, Infratil Limited announced that it had agreed to sell 53,531,358 ordinary shares in Contact
Energy Limited (“Contact"), representing approximately 5.0% of Contact’s issued share capital, via a fully
underwritten block trade. The shares are to be sold at $9.25 per share, generating expected gross proceeds
of approximately $495 million. Settlement of the transaction is expected to occur on 25 May 2026 with no
significant revaluation expected to be recognised in OCI. Following completion of the transaction, Infratil’s
shareholding in Contact is expected to reduce to approximately 9.08%.
92
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
© 2025 KPMG, a New Zealand Partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organization of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited,
a private English company limited by guarantee. All rights reserved.
Document classification: KPMG Confidential
Independent Auditor’s Report
To the shareholders of Infratil Limited (G roup)
Report on the audit of the consolidated financial statements
Opinion
We have audited the accompanying consolidated
financial statements which comprise:
the consolidated statement of financial position as
at 31 March 2025;
the consolidated statements of comprehensive
income, changes in equity and cash flows for the
year then ended; and
notes, including material accounting policy
information and other explanatory information.
In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated
financial statements of Infratil Limited (the Company)
and its subsidiaries (the Group) on pages 54 to 118
present fairly in all material respects:
the Group’s financial position as at 31 March
2025 and its financial performance and cash
flows for the year ended on that date;
In accordance with New Zealand Equivalents to
International Financial Reporting Standards (NZ
IFRS) issued by the New Zealand Accounting
Standards Board and the International Financial
Reporting Standards issued by the International
Accounting Standards Board.
Basis for opinion
We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (New Zealand) (ISAs (NZ)). We
believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.
We are independent of Infratil Limited in accordance with Professional and Ethical Standard 1 International Code
of Ethics for Assurance Practitioners (Including International Independence Standards) (New Zealand) issued by
the New Zealand Auditing and Assurance Standards Board and the International Ethics Standards Board for
Accountants’ International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (including International Independence
Standards) (IESBA Code), as applicable to audits of financial statements of public interest entities. We have also
fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with Professional and Ethical Standards 1 and the IESBA
Code.
Our responsibilities under ISAs (NZ)(Revised) are further described in the Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit
of the consolidated financial statements section of our report.
Our firm has also provided other services to the Group in relation to climate related assurance, taxation services,
audit of regulatory disclosures and other assurance and advisory engagements. Subject to certain restrictions,
partners and employees of our firm may also deal with the Group on normal terms within the ordinary course of
trading activities of the business of the Group. These matters have not impaired our independence as auditor of
the Group. The firm has no other relationship with, or interest in, the Group.
Scoping
© 2025 KPMG, a New Zealand Partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organization of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited,
a private English company limited by guarantee. All rights reserved.
Document classification: KPMG Confidential
Independent Auditor’s Report
To the shareholders of Infratil Limited (G roup)
Report on the audit of the consolidated financial statements
Opinion
We have audited the accompanying consolidated
financial statements which comprise:
the consolidated statement of financial position as
at 31 March 2025;
the consolidated statements of comprehensive
income, changes in equity and cash flows for the
year then ended; and
notes, including material accounting policy
information and other explanatory information.
In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated
financial statements of Infratil Limited (the Company)
and its subsidiaries (the Group) on pages 54 to 118
present fairly in all material respects:
the Group’s financial position as at 31 March
2025 and its financial performance and cash
flows for the year ended on that date;
In accordance with New Zealand Equivalents to
International Financial Reporting Standards (NZ
IFRS) issued by the New Zealand Accounting
Standards Board and the International Financial
Reporting Standards issued by the International
Accounting Standards Board.
Basis for opinion
We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (New Zealand) (ISAs (NZ)). We
believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.
We are independent of Infratil Limited in accordance with Professional and Ethical Standard 1 International Code
of Ethics for Assurance Practitioners (Including International Independence Standards) (New Zealand) issued by
the New Zealand Auditing and Assurance Standards Board and the International Ethics Standards Board for
Accountants’ International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (including International Independence
Standards) (IESBA Code), as applicable to audits of financial statements of public interest entities. We have also
fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with Professional and Ethical Standards 1 and the IESBA
Code.
Our responsibilities under ISAs (NZ)(Revised) are further described in the Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit
of the consolidated financial statements section of our report.
Our firm has also provided other services to the Group in relation to climate related assurance, taxation services,
audit of regulatory disclosures and other assurance and advisory engagements. Subject to certain restrictions,
partners and employees of our firm may also deal with the Group on normal terms within the ordinary course of
trading activities of the business of the Group. These matters have not impaired our independence as auditor of
the Group. The firm has no other relationship with, or interest in, the Group.
Scoping
© 2025 KPMG, a New Zealand Partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organization of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited,
a private English company limited by guarantee. All rights reserved.
Document classification: KPMG Confidential
Independent Auditor’s Report
To the shareholders of Infratil Limited (G roup)
Report on the audit of the consolidated financial statements
Opinion
We have audited the accompanying consolidated
financial statements which comprise:
the consolidated statement of financial position as
at 31 March 2025;
the consolidated statements of comprehensive
income, changes in equity and cash flows for the
year then ended; and
notes, including material accounting policy
information and other explanatory information.
In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated
financial statements of Infratil Limited (the Company)
and its subsidiaries (the Group) on pages 54 to 118
present fairly in all material respects:
the Group’s financial position as at 31 March
2025 and its financial performance and cash
flows for the year ended on that date;
In accordance with New Zealand Equivalents to
International Financial Reporting Standards (NZ
IFRS) issued by the New Zealand Accounting
Standards Board and the International Financial
Reporting Standards issued by the International
Accounting Standards Board.
Basis for opinion
We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (New Zealand) (ISAs (NZ)). We
believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.
We are independent of Infratil Limited in accordance with Professional and Ethical Standard 1 International Code
of Ethics for Assurance Practitioners (Including International Independence Standards) (New Zealand) issued by
the New Zealand Auditing and Assurance Standards Board and the International Ethics Standards Board for
Accountants’ International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (including International Independence
Standards) (IESBA Code), as applicable to audits of financial statements of public interest entities. We have also
fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with Professional and Ethical Standards 1 and the IESBA
Code.
Our responsibilities under ISAs (NZ)(Revised) are further described in the Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit
of the consolidated financial statements section of our report.
Our firm has also provided other services to the Group in relation to climate related assurance, taxation services,
audit of regulatory disclosures and other assurance and advisory engagements. Subject to certain restrictions,
partners and employees of our firm may also deal with the Group on normal terms within the ordinary course of
trading activities of the business of the Group. These matters have not impaired our independence as auditor of
the Group. The firm has no other relationship with, or interest in, the Group.
Scoping
To the shareholders of Infratil Limited
Report on the audit of the consolidated financial statements
Opinion
We have audited the accompanying consolidated financial statements which
comprise:
– the consolidated statement of financial position as at 31 March 2026;
– the consolidated statements of comprehensive income, changes in equity and
cash flows for the year then ended; and
– notes, including material accounting policy information and other explanatory
information.
In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated financial statements of Infratil Limited
(the Company) and its subsidiaries (the Group) on pages 33 to 91 present fairly in all
material respects:
– the Group’s financial position as at 31 March 2026 and its financial performance
and cash flows for the year ended on that date;
In accordance with New Zealand Equivalents to International Financial Reporting
Standards (NZ IFRS) issued by the New Zealand Accounting Standards Board and
the International Financial Reporting Standards issued by the International
Accounting Standards Board.
We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (New Zealand)
(ISAs (NZ)). We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate
to provide a basis for our opinion.
We are independent of Infratil Limited in accordance with Professional and Ethical Standard 1
International Code of Ethics for Assurance Practitioners (Including International Independence
Standards) (New Zealand) issued by the New Zealand Auditing and Assurance Standards Board
and the International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants’ International Code of Ethics for
Professional Accountants (including International Independence Standards) (IESBA Code), as
applicable to audits of financial statements of public interest entities. We have also fulfilled our
other ethical responsibilities in accordance with Professional and Ethical Standards 1 and the
IESBA Code.
Our responsibilities under ISAs (NZ) are further described in the
Auditor’s responsibilities for the
audit of the consolidated financial statements
section of our report.
Our firm has also provided other services to the Group in relation to climate related assurance,
taxation services, audit of regulatory disclosures, other assurance and advisory engagements.
Subject to certain restrictions, partners and employees of our firm may also deal with the Group
on normal terms within the ordinary course of trading activities of the business of the Group.
These matters have not impaired our independence as auditor of the Group. The firm has no
other relationship with, or interest in, the Group.
© 2025 KPMG, a New Zealand Partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organization of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited,
a private English company limited by guarantee. All rights reserved.
Document classification: KPMG Confidential
Independent Auditor’s Report
To the shareholders of Infratil Limited (G roup)
Report on the audit of the consolidated financial statements
Opinion
We have audited the accompanying consolidated
financial statements which comprise:
the consolidated statement of financial position as
at 31 March 2025;
the consolidated statements of comprehensive
income, changes in equity and cash flows for the
year then ended; and
notes, including material accounting policy
information and other explanatory information.
In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated
financial statements of Infratil Limited (the Company)
and its subsidiaries (the Group) on pages 54 to 118
present fairly in all material respects:
the Group’s financial position as at 31 March
2025 and its financial performance and cash
flows for the year ended on that date;
In accordance with New Zealand Equivalents to
International Financial Reporting Standards (NZ
IFRS) issued by the New Zealand Accounting
Standards Board and the International Financial
Reporting Standards issued by the International
Accounting Standards Board.
Basis for opinion
We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (New Zealand) (ISAs (NZ)). We
believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.
We are independent of Infratil Limited in accordance with Professional and Ethical Standard 1 International Code
of Ethics for Assurance Practitioners (Including International Independence Standards) (New Zealand) issued by
the New Zealand Auditing and Assurance Standards Board and the International Ethics Standards Board for
Accountants’ International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (including International Independence
Standards) (IESBA Code), as applicable to audits of financial statements of public interest entities. We have also
fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with Professional and Ethical Standards 1 and the IESBA
Code.
Our responsibilities under ISAs (NZ)(Revised) are further described in the Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit
of the consolidated financial statements section of our report.
Our firm has also provided other services to the Group in relation to climate related assurance, taxation services,
audit of regulatory disclosures and other assurance and advisory engagements. Subject to certain restrictions,
partners and employees of our firm may also deal with the Group on normal terms within the ordinary course of
trading activities of the business of the Group. These matters have not impaired our independence as auditor of
the Group. The firm has no other relationship with, or interest in, the Group.
Scoping
© 2025 KPMG, a New Zealand Partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organization of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited,
a private English company limited by guarantee. All rights reserved.
Document classification: KPMG Confidential
Independent Auditor’s Report
To the shareholders of Infratil Limited (G roup)
Report on the audit of the consolidated financial statements
Opinion
We have audited the accompanying consolidated
financial statements which comprise:
the consolidated statement of financial position as
at 31 March 2025;
the consolidated statements of comprehensive
income, changes in equity and cash flows for the
year then ended; and
notes, including material accounting policy
information and other explanatory information.
In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated
financial statements of Infratil Limited (the Company)
and its subsidiaries (the Group) on pages 54 to 118
present fairly in all material respects:
the Group’s financial position as at 31 March
2025 and its financial performance and cash
flows for the year ended on that date;
In accordance with New Zealand Equivalents to
International Financial Reporting Standards (NZ
IFRS) issued by the New Zealand Accounting
Standards Board and the International Financial
Reporting Standards issued by the International
Accounting Standards Board.
Basis for opinion
We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (New Zealand) (ISAs (NZ)). We
believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.
We are independent of Infratil Limited in accordance with Professional and Ethical Standard 1 International Code
of Ethics for Assurance Practitioners (Including International Independence Standards) (New Zealand) issued by
the New Zealand Auditing and Assurance Standards Board and the International Ethics Standards Board for
Accountants’ International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (including International Independence
Standards) (IESBA Code), as applicable to audits of financial statements of public interest entities. We have also
fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with Professional and Ethical Standards 1 and the IESBA
Code.
Our responsibilities under ISAs (NZ)(Revised) are further described in the Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit
of the consolidated financial statements section of our report.
Our firm has also provided other services to the Group in relation to climate related assurance, taxation services,
audit of regulatory disclosures and other assurance and advisory engagements. Subject to certain restrictions,
partners and employees of our firm may also deal with the Group on normal terms within the ordinary course of
trading activities of the business of the Group. These matters have not impaired our independence as auditor of
the Group. The firm has no other relationship with, or interest in, the Group.
Scoping
© 2026 KPMG, a New Zealand Partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a private English company limited by guarantee. All rights reserved.
Document classification: KPMG Confidential
93
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
© 2025 KPMG, a New Zealand Partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organization of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited,
a private English company limited by guarantee. All rights reserved.
Document classification: KPMG Confidential
Independent Auditor’s Report
To the shareholders of Infratil Limited (G roup)
Report on the audit of the consolidated financial statements
Opinion
We have audited the accompanying consolidated
financial statements which comprise:
the consolidated statement of financial position as
at 31 March 2025;
the consolidated statements of comprehensive
income, changes in equity and cash flows for the
year then ended; and
notes, including material accounting policy
information and other explanatory information.
In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated
financial statements of Infratil Limited (the Company)
and its subsidiaries (the Group) on pages 54 to 118
present fairly in all material respects:
the Group’s financial position as at 31 March
2025 and its financial performance and cash
flows for the year ended on that date;
In accordance with New Zealand Equivalents to
International Financial Reporting Standards (NZ
IFRS) issued by the New Zealand Accounting
Standards Board and the International Financial
Reporting Standards issued by the International
Accounting Standards Board.
Basis for opinion
We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (New Zealand) (ISAs (NZ)). We
believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.
We are independent of Infratil Limited in accordance with Professional and Ethical Standard 1 International Code
of Ethics for Assurance Practitioners (Including International Independence Standards) (New Zealand) issued by
the New Zealand Auditing and Assurance Standards Board and the International Ethics Standards Board for
Accountants’ International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (including International Independence
Standards) (IESBA Code), as applicable to audits of financial statements of public interest entities. We have also
fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with Professional and Ethical Standards 1 and the IESBA
Code.
Our responsibilities under ISAs (NZ)(Revised) are further described in the Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit
of the consolidated financial statements section of our report.
Our firm has also provided other services to the Group in relation to climate related assurance, taxation services,
audit of regulatory disclosures and other assurance and advisory engagements. Subject to certain restrictions,
partners and employees of our firm may also deal with the Group on normal terms within the ordinary course of
trading activities of the business of the Group. These matters have not impaired our independence as auditor of
the Group. The firm has no other relationship with, or interest in, the Group.
Scoping
The scope of our audit is designed to ensure that we perform adequate work to be able to give
an opinion on the consolidated financial statements as a whole, taking into account the structure
of the Group, the financial reporting systems, processes and controls, and the industry in which
it operates.
The context of our audit is set by the Group’s major activities in the financial year ended
31 March 2026. In establishing the overall approach to the Group audit, we determined the type
of work that needed to be performed at the component level by us, as the Group engagement
team, or component auditors operating under our instruction.
A full scope audit was performed on the most significant investments for the Group using
component materialities which were lower than Group materiality. The component materiality
considered the size and the risk profile of each component.
Where the work was performed by component auditors, we determined the level of involvement
we needed to have in the audit work at those investments to be able to conclude whether
sufficient appropriate audit evidence had been obtained as a basis for our opinion on the Group
financial statements as a whole. We kept in regular communication with component audit teams
throughout the year with phone calls, discussions and written instructions and ensured that the
component audit teams had the appropriate skills and competencies which are needed for the
audit. We reviewed the work undertaken by component auditors in order to ensure the quality
and adequacy of their work.
2
The scope of our audit is designed to ensure that we perform adequate work to be able to give an opinion on the
consolidated financial statements as a whole, taking into account the structure of the Group, the financial
reporting systems, processes and controls, and the industry in which it operates.
The context of our audit is set by the Group’s major activities in the financial year ended 31 March 2025. In
establishing the overall approach to the Group audit, we determined the type of work that needed to be
performed at the component level by us, as the Group engagement team, or component auditors operating under
our instruction.
A full scope audit was performed on the most significant investments for the Group using component materialities
which were lower than Group materiality. The component materiality considered the size and the risk profile of
each component.
Where the work was performed by component auditors, we determined the level of involvement we needed to
have in the audit work at those investments to be able to conclude whether sufficient appropriate audit evidence
had been obtained as a basis for our opinion on the Group financial statements as a whole. We kept in regular
communication with component audit teams throughout the year with phone calls, discussions and written
instructions and ensured that the component audit teams had the appropriate skills and competencies which are
needed for the audit. We reviewed the work undertaken by component auditors in order to ensure the quality and
adequacy of their work.
Materiality
The scope of our audit was influenced by our application of materiality. Materiality helped us to determine the
nature, timing and extent of our audit procedures and to evaluate the effect of misstatements, both individually
and on the consolidated financial statements as a whole. The materiality for the consolidated financial statements
as a whole was set at $120 million, determined with reference to a benchmark of the Group’s total assets. We
chose the benchmark because, in our view, this is a key measure of the Group’s performance.
Key audit matters
Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgement, were of most significance in our audit of
the consolidated financial statements in the current period. We summarise below those matters and our key audit
procedures to address those matters in order that the shareholders as a body may better understand the process
by which we arrived at our audit opinion.
Our procedures were undertaken in the context of and solely for the purpose of our audit opinion on the
consolidated financial statements as a whole and we do not express discrete opinions on separate elements of
the consolidated financial statements.
The key audit matter How the matter was addressed in our audit
Carrying value of goodwill
As disclosed in note 16, the carrying value of the
Group’s goodwill as at 31 March 2025 was $4.7
billion. Key goodwill balances relate to One NZ,
$2.9 billion, RHCNZ Group, $1.1 billion, and
Qscan Group, $0.7 billion.
The goodwill is tested for impairment using
discounted cash flow models, which include a
range of judgemental assumptions about the
Our audit procedures over the goodwill included:
Assessing the appropriateness of the CGUs
determined;
Comparing the methodology adopted in the valuation
models to accepted valuation approaches;
2
The scope of our audit is designed to ensure that we perform adequate work to be able to give an opinion on the
consolidated financial statements as a whole, taking into account the structure of the Group, the financial
reporting systems, processes and controls, and the industry in which it operates.
The context of our audit is set by the Group’s major activities in the financial year ended 31 March 2025. In
establishing the overall approach to the Group audit, we determined the type of work that needed to be
performed at the component level by us, as the Group engagement team, or component auditors operating under
our instruction.
A full scope audit was performed on the most significant investments for the Group using component materialities
which were lower than Group materiality. The component materiality considered the size and the risk profile of
each component.
Where the work was performed by component auditors, we determined the level of involvement we needed to
have in the audit work at those investments to be able to conclude whether sufficient appropriate audit evidence
had been obtained as a basis for our opinion on the Group financial statements as a whole. We kept in regular
communication with component audit teams throughout the year with phone calls, discussions and written
instructions and ensured that the component audit teams had the appropriate skills and competencies which are
needed for the audit. We reviewed the work undertaken by component auditors in order to ensure the quality and
adequacy of their work.
Materiality
The scope of our audit was influenced by our application of materiality. Materiality helped us to determine the
nature, timing and extent of our audit procedures and to evaluate the effect of misstatements, both individually
and on the consolidated financial statements as a whole. The materiality for the consolidated financial statements
as a whole was set at $120 million, determined with reference to a benchmark of the Group’s total assets. We
chose the benchmark because, in our view, this is a key measure of the Group’s performance.
Key audit matters
Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgement, were of most significance in our audit of
the consolidated financial statements in the current period. We summarise below those matters and our key audit
procedures to address those matters in order that the shareholders as a body may better understand the process
by which we arrived at our audit opinion.
Our procedures were undertaken in the context of and solely for the purpose of our audit opinion on the
consolidated financial statements as a whole and we do not express discrete opinions on separate elements of
the consolidated financial statements.
The key audit matter How the matter was addressed in our audit
Carrying value of goodwill
As disclosed in note 16, the carrying value of the
Group’s goodwill as at 31 March 2025 was $4.7
billion. Key goodwill balances relate to One NZ,
$2.9 billion, RHCNZ Group, $1.1 billion, and
Qscan Group, $0.7 billion.
The goodwill is tested for impairment using
discounted cash flow models, which include a
range of judgemental assumptions about the
Our audit procedures over the goodwill included:
Assessing the appropriateness of the CGUs
determined;
Comparing the methodology adopted in the valuation
models to accepted valuation approaches;
The scope of our audit was influenced by our application of materiality. Materiality helped us
to determine the nature, timing and extent of our audit procedures and to evaluate the effect
of misstatements, both individually and on the consolidated financial statements as a whole.
The materiality for the consolidated financial statements as a whole was set at $130 million,
determined with reference to a benchmark of the Group’s total assets. We chose the benchmark
because, in our view, this is a key measure of the Group’s performance.
Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgement, were of most
significance in our audit of the consolidated financial statements in the current period. We
summarise below those matters and our key audit procedures to address those matters in order
that the shareholders as a body may better understand the process by which we arrived at our
audit opinion.
Our procedures were undertaken in the context of and solely for the purpose of our audit opinion
on the consolidated financial statements as a whole and we do not express discrete opinions on
separate elements of the consolidated financial statements.
© 2025 KPMG, a New Zealand Partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organization of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited,
a private English company limited by guarantee. All rights reserved.
Document classification: KPMG Confidential
Independent Auditor’s Report
To the shareholders of Infratil Limited (G roup)
Report on the audit of the consolidated financial statements
Opinion
We have audited the accompanying consolidated
financial statements which comprise:
the consolidated statement of financial position as
at 31 March 2025;
the consolidated statements of comprehensive
income, changes in equity and cash flows for the
year then ended; and
notes, including material accounting policy
information and other explanatory information.
In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated
financial statements of Infratil Limited (the Company)
and its subsidiaries (the Group) on pages 54 to 118
present fairly in all material respects:
the Group’s financial position as at 31 March
2025 and its financial performance and cash
flows for the year ended on that date;
In accordance with New Zealand Equivalents to
International Financial Reporting Standards (NZ
IFRS) issued by the New Zealand Accounting
Standards Board and the International Financial
Reporting Standards issued by the International
Accounting Standards Board.
Basis for opinion
We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (New Zealand) (ISAs (NZ)). We
believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.
We are independent of Infratil Limited in accordance with Professional and Ethical Standard 1 International Code
of Ethics for Assurance Practitioners (Including International Independence Standards) (New Zealand) issued by
the New Zealand Auditing and Assurance Standards Board and the International Ethics Standards Board for
Accountants’ International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (including International Independence
Standards) (IESBA Code), as applicable to audits of financial statements of public interest entities. We have also
fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with Professional and Ethical Standards 1 and the IESBA
Code.
Our responsibilities under ISAs (NZ)(Revised) are further described in the Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit
of the consolidated financial statements section of our report.
Our firm has also provided other services to the Group in relation to climate related assurance, taxation services,
audit of regulatory disclosures and other assurance and advisory engagements. Subject to certain restrictions,
partners and employees of our firm may also deal with the Group on normal terms within the ordinary course of
trading activities of the business of the Group. These matters have not impaired our independence as auditor of
the Group. The firm has no other relationship with, or interest in, the Group.
Scoping
94
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
© 2025 KPMG, a New Zealand Partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organization of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited,
a private English company limited by guarantee. All rights reserved.
Document classification: KPMG Confidential
Independent Auditor’s Report
To the shareholders of Infratil Limited (G roup)
Report on the audit of the consolidated financial statements
Opinion
We have audited the accompanying consolidated
financial statements which comprise:
the consolidated statement of financial position as
at 31 March 2025;
the consolidated statements of comprehensive
income, changes in equity and cash flows for the
year then ended; and
notes, including material accounting policy
information and other explanatory information.
In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated
financial statements of Infratil Limited (the Company)
and its subsidiaries (the Group) on pages 54 to 118
present fairly in all material respects:
the Group’s financial position as at 31 March
2025 and its financial performance and cash
flows for the year ended on that date;
In accordance with New Zealand Equivalents to
International Financial Reporting Standards (NZ
IFRS) issued by the New Zealand Accounting
Standards Board and the International Financial
Reporting Standards issued by the International
Accounting Standards Board.
Basis for opinion
We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (New Zealand) (ISAs (NZ)). We
believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.
We are independent of Infratil Limited in accordance with Professional and Ethical Standard 1 International Code
of Ethics for Assurance Practitioners (Including International Independence Standards) (New Zealand) issued by
the New Zealand Auditing and Assurance Standards Board and the International Ethics Standards Board for
Accountants’ International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (including International Independence
Standards) (IESBA Code), as applicable to audits of financial statements of public interest entities. We have also
fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with Professional and Ethical Standards 1 and the IESBA
Code.
Our responsibilities under ISAs (NZ)(Revised) are further described in the Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit
of the consolidated financial statements section of our report.
Our firm has also provided other services to the Group in relation to climate related assurance, taxation services,
audit of regulatory disclosures and other assurance and advisory engagements. Subject to certain restrictions,
partners and employees of our firm may also deal with the Group on normal terms within the ordinary course of
trading activities of the business of the Group. These matters have not impaired our independence as auditor of
the Group. The firm has no other relationship with, or interest in, the Group.
Scoping
2
The scope of our audit is designed to ensure that we perform adequate work to be able to give an opinion on the
consolidated financial statements as a whole, taking into account the structure of the Group, the financial
reporting systems, processes and controls, and the industry in which it operates.
The context of our audit is set by the Group’s major activities in the financial year ended 31 March 2025. In
establishing the overall approach to the Group audit, we determined the type of work that needed to be
performed at the component level by us, as the Group engagement team, or component auditors operating under
our instruction.
A full scope audit was performed on the most significant investments for the Group using component materialities
which were lower than Group materiality. The component materiality considered the size and the risk profile of
each component.
Where the work was performed by component auditors, we determined the level of involvement we needed to
have in the audit work at those investments to be able to conclude whether sufficient appropriate audit evidence
had been obtained as a basis for our opinion on the Group financial statements as a whole. We kept in regular
communication with component audit teams throughout the year with phone calls, discussions and written
instructions and ensured that the component audit teams had the appropriate skills and competencies which are
needed for the audit. We reviewed the work undertaken by component auditors in order to ensure the quality and
adequacy of their work.
Materiality
The scope of our audit was influenced by our application of materiality. Materiality helped us to determine the
nature, timing and extent of our audit procedures and to evaluate the effect of misstatements, both individually
and on the consolidated financial statements as a whole. The materiality for the consolidated financial statements
as a whole was set at $120 million, determined with reference to a benchmark of the Group’s total assets. We
chose the benchmark because, in our view, this is a key measure of the Group’s performance.
Key audit matters
Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgement, were of most significance in our audit of
the consolidated financial statements in the current period. We summarise below those matters and our key audit
procedures to address those matters in order that the shareholders as a body may better understand the process
by which we arrived at our audit opinion.
Our procedures were undertaken in the context of and solely for the purpose of our audit opinion on the
consolidated financial statements as a whole and we do not express discrete opinions on separate elements of
the consolidated financial statements.
The key audit matter How the matter was addressed in our audit
Carrying value of goodwill
As disclosed in note 16, the carrying value of the
Group’s goodwill as at 31 March 2025 was $4.7
billion. Key goodwill balances relate to One NZ,
$2.9 billion, RHCNZ Group, $1.1 billion, and
Qscan Group, $0.7 billion.
The goodwill is tested for impairment using
discounted cash flow models, which include a
range of judgemental assumptions about the
Our audit procedures over the goodwill included:
Assessing the appropriateness of the CGUs
determined;
Comparing the methodology adopted in the valuation
models to accepted valuation approaches;
2
The scope of our audit is designed to ensure that we perform adequate work to be able to give an opinion on the
consolidated financial statements as a whole, taking into account the structure of the Group, the financial
reporting systems, processes and controls, and the industry in which it operates.
The context of our audit is set by the Group’s major activities in the financial year ended 31 March 2025. In
establishing the overall approach to the Group audit, we determined the type of work that needed to be
performed at the component level by us, as the Group engagement team, or component auditors operating under
our instruction.
A full scope audit was performed on the most significant investments for the Group using component materialities
which were lower than Group materiality. The component materiality considered the size and the risk profile of
each component.
Where the work was performed by component auditors, we determined the level of involvement we needed to
have in the audit work at those investments to be able to conclude whether sufficient appropriate audit evidence
had been obtained as a basis for our opinion on the Group financial statements as a whole. We kept in regular
communication with component audit teams throughout the year with phone calls, discussions and written
instructions and ensured that the component audit teams had the appropriate skills and competencies which are
needed for the audit. We reviewed the work undertaken by component auditors in order to ensure the quality and
adequacy of their work.
Materiality
The scope of our audit was influenced by our application of materiality. Materiality helped us to determine the
nature, timing and extent of our audit procedures and to evaluate the effect of misstatements, both individually
and on the consolidated financial statements as a whole. The materiality for the consolidated financial statements
as a whole was set at $120 million, determined with reference to a benchmark of the Group’s total assets. We
chose the benchmark because, in our view, this is a key measure of the Group’s performance.
Key audit matters
Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgement, were of most significance in our audit of
the consolidated financial statements in the current period. We summarise below those matters and our key audit
procedures to address those matters in order that the shareholders as a body may better understand the process
by which we arrived at our audit opinion.
Our procedures were undertaken in the context of and solely for the purpose of our audit opinion on the
consolidated financial statements as a whole and we do not express discrete opinions on separate elements of
the consolidated financial statements.
The key audit matter How the matter was addressed in our audit
Carrying value of goodwill
As disclosed in note 16, the carrying value of the
Group’s goodwill as at 31 March 2025 was $4.7
billion. Key goodwill balances relate to One NZ,
$2.9 billion, RHCNZ Group, $1.1 billion, and
Qscan Group, $0.7 billion.
The goodwill is tested for impairment using
discounted cash flow models, which include a
range of judgemental assumptions about the
Our audit procedures over the goodwill included:
Assessing the appropriateness of the CGUs
determined;
Comparing the methodology adopted in the valuation
models to accepted valuation approaches;
Carrying value of goodwill
As disclosed in note 17, the carrying value of the Group’s goodwill as at 31 March 2026 was
$4.7 billion. Key goodwill balances relate to One NZ, $2.9 billion, RHCNZ Group, $1.0 billion,
and Qscan Group, $0.7 billion.
The goodwill is tested for impairment using discounted cash flow models, which include a range
of judgemental assumptions about the future performance of the relevant cash generating unit
(CGU).
The impairment testing focuses on those assumptions which have the most impact on value
and therefore are associated with a higher risk of impairment.
Given the significance of the goodwill to the Group, we consider this to be a key audit matter.
Our audit procedures over the goodwill included:
– Assessing the appropriateness of the CGUs determined;
– Comparing the methodology adopted in the valuation models to accepted valuation
approaches;
– Comparing the cash flow forecasts to Board approved budgets;
– Challenging future cash flow forecasts by comparing to historic growth rates achieved
and other relevant support, including independent market research;
– Using our valuation specialists to assess the reasonableness of the discount and terminal
growth rates used for each CGU; and
– Performing sensitivity analysis, considering a range of likely outcomes for various scenarios.
Carrying Value of investments in associates
As disclosed in Note 6, the carrying value of the Group’s investments in associates as at
31 March 2026 was $5.0 billion. Investments in associates contribute a significant portion
of the Group’s net surplus and total assets.
We consider this to be a key audit matter given the significance of these investments to the
Group, and due to the complexity of the restatement of the share of associate earnings, other
Comprehensive Income and the Investment in Associates balances during the year, as outlined
in Note 1.
Our procedures performed to assess the carrying value of associates included, amongst
others:
– Recalculating the share of profit from equity accounted investments using investee
financial information;
– Agreeing material investment additions, capital calls and distributions during the year
to bank statements and relevant shareholder agreements;
– Assessing the appropriateness of the prior period restatement relating to Longroad
Energy; and
– Considering the associate’s performance to date with reference to the most recent
audited financial statements and assessing relevant indicators of impairment.
95
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
© 2025 KPMG, a New Zealand Partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organization of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited,
a private English company limited by guarantee. All rights reserved.
Document classification: KPMG Confidential
Independent Auditor’s Report
To the shareholders of Infratil Limited (G roup)
Report on the audit of the consolidated financial statements
Opinion
We have audited the accompanying consolidated
financial statements which comprise:
the consolidated statement of financial position as
at 31 March 2025;
the consolidated statements of comprehensive
income, changes in equity and cash flows for the
year then ended; and
notes, including material accounting policy
information and other explanatory information.
In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated
financial statements of Infratil Limited (the Company)
and its subsidiaries (the Group) on pages 54 to 118
present fairly in all material respects:
the Group’s financial position as at 31 March
2025 and its financial performance and cash
flows for the year ended on that date;
In accordance with New Zealand Equivalents to
International Financial Reporting Standards (NZ
IFRS) issued by the New Zealand Accounting
Standards Board and the International Financial
Reporting Standards issued by the International
Accounting Standards Board.
Basis for opinion
We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (New Zealand) (ISAs (NZ)). We
believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.
We are independent of Infratil Limited in accordance with Professional and Ethical Standard 1 International Code
of Ethics for Assurance Practitioners (Including International Independence Standards) (New Zealand) issued by
the New Zealand Auditing and Assurance Standards Board and the International Ethics Standards Board for
Accountants’ International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (including International Independence
Standards) (IESBA Code), as applicable to audits of financial statements of public interest entities. We have also
fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with Professional and Ethical Standards 1 and the IESBA
Code.
Our responsibilities under ISAs (NZ)(Revised) are further described in the Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit
of the consolidated financial statements section of our report.
Our firm has also provided other services to the Group in relation to climate related assurance, taxation services,
audit of regulatory disclosures and other assurance and advisory engagements. Subject to certain restrictions,
partners and employees of our firm may also deal with the Group on normal terms within the ordinary course of
trading activities of the business of the Group. These matters have not impaired our independence as auditor of
the Group. The firm has no other relationship with, or interest in, the Group.
Scoping
2
The scope of our audit is designed to ensure that we perform adequate work to be able to give an opinion on the
consolidated financial statements as a whole, taking into account the structure of the Group, the financial
reporting systems, processes and controls, and the industry in which it operates.
The context of our audit is set by the Group’s major activities in the financial year ended 31 March 2025. In
establishing the overall approach to the Group audit, we determined the type of work that needed to be
performed at the component level by us, as the Group engagement team, or component auditors operating under
our instruction.
A full scope audit was performed on the most significant investments for the Group using component materialities
which were lower than Group materiality. The component materiality considered the size and the risk profile of
each component.
Where the work was performed by component auditors, we determined the level of involvement we needed to
have in the audit work at those investments to be able to conclude whether sufficient appropriate audit evidence
had been obtained as a basis for our opinion on the Group financial statements as a whole. We kept in regular
communication with component audit teams throughout the year with phone calls, discussions and written
instructions and ensured that the component audit teams had the appropriate skills and competencies which are
needed for the audit. We reviewed the work undertaken by component auditors in order to ensure the quality and
adequacy of their work.
Materiality
The scope of our audit was influenced by our application of materiality. Materiality helped us to determine the
nature, timing and extent of our audit procedures and to evaluate the effect of misstatements, both individually
and on the consolidated financial statements as a whole. The materiality for the consolidated financial statements
as a whole was set at $120 million, determined with reference to a benchmark of the Group’s total assets. We
chose the benchmark because, in our view, this is a key measure of the Group’s performance.
Key audit matters
Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgement, were of most significance in our audit of
the consolidated financial statements in the current period. We summarise below those matters and our key audit
procedures to address those matters in order that the shareholders as a body may better understand the process
by which we arrived at our audit opinion.
Our procedures were undertaken in the context of and solely for the purpose of our audit opinion on the
consolidated financial statements as a whole and we do not express discrete opinions on separate elements of
the consolidated financial statements.
The key audit matter How the matter was addressed in our audit
Carrying value of goodwill
As disclosed in note 16, the carrying value of the
Group’s goodwill as at 31 March 2025 was $4.7
billion. Key goodwill balances relate to One NZ,
$2.9 billion, RHCNZ Group, $1.1 billion, and
Qscan Group, $0.7 billion.
The goodwill is tested for impairment using
discounted cash flow models, which include a
range of judgemental assumptions about the
Our audit procedures over the goodwill included:
Assessing the appropriateness of the CGUs
determined;
Comparing the methodology adopted in the valuation
models to accepted valuation approaches;
2
The scope of our audit is designed to ensure that we perform adequate work to be able to give an opinion on the
consolidated financial statements as a whole, taking into account the structure of the Group, the financial
reporting systems, processes and controls, and the industry in which it operates.
The context of our audit is set by the Group’s major activities in the financial year ended 31 March 2025. In
establishing the overall approach to the Group audit, we determined the type of work that needed to be
performed at the component level by us, as the Group engagement team, or component auditors operating under
our instruction.
A full scope audit was performed on the most significant investments for the Group using component materialities
which were lower than Group materiality. The component materiality considered the size and the risk profile of
each component.
Where the work was performed by component auditors, we determined the level of involvement we needed to
have in the audit work at those investments to be able to conclude whether sufficient appropriate audit evidence
had been obtained as a basis for our opinion on the Group financial statements as a whole. We kept in regular
communication with component audit teams throughout the year with phone calls, discussions and written
instructions and ensured that the component audit teams had the appropriate skills and competencies which are
needed for the audit. We reviewed the work undertaken by component auditors in order to ensure the quality and
adequacy of their work.
Materiality
The scope of our audit was influenced by our application of materiality. Materiality helped us to determine the
nature, timing and extent of our audit procedures and to evaluate the effect of misstatements, both individually
and on the consolidated financial statements as a whole. The materiality for the consolidated financial statements
as a whole was set at $120 million, determined with reference to a benchmark of the Group’s total assets. We
chose the benchmark because, in our view, this is a key measure of the Group’s performance.
Key audit matters
Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgement, were of most significance in our audit of
the consolidated financial statements in the current period. We summarise below those matters and our key audit
procedures to address those matters in order that the shareholders as a body may better understand the process
by which we arrived at our audit opinion.
Our procedures were undertaken in the context of and solely for the purpose of our audit opinion on the
consolidated financial statements as a whole and we do not express discrete opinions on separate elements of
the consolidated financial statements.
The key audit matter How the matter was addressed in our audit
Carrying value of goodwill
As disclosed in note 16, the carrying value of the
Group’s goodwill as at 31 March 2025 was $4.7
billion. Key goodwill balances relate to One NZ,
$2.9 billion, RHCNZ Group, $1.1 billion, and
Qscan Group, $0.7 billion.
The goodwill is tested for impairment using
discounted cash flow models, which include a
range of judgemental assumptions about the
Our audit procedures over the goodwill included:
Assessing the appropriateness of the CGUs
determined;
Comparing the methodology adopted in the valuation
models to accepted valuation approaches;
Revenue Recognition
As disclosed in Note 10, the Group reported revenue of $3.0 billion for the year ended
31 March 2026. Management recognises revenue according to the principles of IFRS 15
Revenue from Contracts with Customers, including following the 5-step model therein.
Revenue recognition is a key audit matter for Mobile and fixed services, and device revenue
earned by One NZ, as there is an inherent risk around the accuracy and timing of revenue
recognition given the complexity of systems, the large volume of data processed and manual
adjustments made. Moreover, significant management judgements and estimates are required
for multiple element arrangements. This risk is most pronounced for new bundled product
offerings or changing product plans and prices.
Our procedures over revenue recognition included, amongst others:
– Obtaining an understanding of billing systems and arrangements (including IT systems,
applications and control points).
– On a sample basis, testing underlying revenue transactions to invoice and receipt of cash
and evaluating the appropriateness of the allocation of the transaction price, including
variable consideration, to performance obligations.
– Reviewing the reconciliation between the underlying billing stacks to revenue reported in
the general ledger. Reconciling items and related journals were evaluated for accuracy and
appropriateness based on the nature of the manual entries posted.
– Deploying AI-enabled transaction scoring to identity higher-risk billed items for testing.
– Deploying KPMG AI Data and Analytics tools to identify unexpected ‘account pairings’ for
journal entries and inspected the underlying records to evaluate the appropriateness of
these journal entries.
– Evaluating revenue transactions either side of the reporting date to assess if these are
recognised in the correct period.
6
The key audit matter How the matter was addressed in our audit
Evaluating revenue transactions either side of the
reporting date to assess if these are recognised in the
correct period.
Other information
The Directors, on behalf of the Group, are responsible for the other information. The other information comprises
information included in the Annual Report, but does not include the financial statements and our auditor’s report
thereon. Other information includes discussion and analysis of the business on pages 1 to 51 and corporate
governance disclosures on pages 126 to 140.
Our opinion on the consolidated financial statements does not cover any other information and we do not
express any form of assurance conclusion thereon.
In connection with our audit of the consolidated financial statements our responsibility is to read the other
information and in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the
consolidated financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit or otherwise appears materially
misstated.
If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude there is a material misstatement of this other information,
we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report in this regard.
Use of this independent auditor’s report
This independent auditor’s report is made solely to the shareholders. Our audit work has been undertaken so
that we might state to the shareholders those matters we are required to state to them in the independent
auditor’s report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, none of KPMG, any entities
directly or indirectly controlled by KPMG, or any of their respective members or employees, accept or assume
any responsibility and deny all liability to anyone other than the shareholders for our audit work, this independent
auditor’s report, or any of the opinions we have formed.
Responsibilities of Directors for the consolidated financial
statements
The Directors, on behalf of the Group, are responsible for:
— the preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with NZ
IFRS issued by the New Zealand Accounting Standards Board and the International Financial Reporting
Standards issued by the International Accounting Standards Board;
— implementing the necessary internal control to enable the preparation of a consolidated set of financial
statements that is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; and
— assessing the ability of the Group to continue as a going concern. This includes disclosing, as
applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless
they either intend to liquidate or to cease operations or have no realistic alternative but to do so.
The Directors, on behalf of the Group, are responsible for the other information. The other
information comprises information included in the Annual Report, but does not include the
financial statements and our auditor’s report thereon. Other information includes discussion
and analysis of the business on pages 1 to 32 and corporate governance disclosures on
pages 98 to 114.
Our opinion on the consolidated financial statements does not cover any other information
and we do not express any form of assurance conclusion thereon.
In connection with our audit of the consolidated financial statements our responsibility is to
read the other information and in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially
inconsistent with the consolidated financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit
or otherwise appears materially misstated.
If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude there is a material misstatement of this
other information, we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report in this regard.
96
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
© 2025 KPMG, a New Zealand Partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organization of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited,
a private English company limited by guarantee. All rights reserved.
Document classification: KPMG Confidential
Independent Auditor’s Report
To the shareholders of Infratil Limited (G roup)
Report on the audit of the consolidated financial statements
Opinion
We have audited the accompanying consolidated
financial statements which comprise:
the consolidated statement of financial position as
at 31 March 2025;
the consolidated statements of comprehensive
income, changes in equity and cash flows for the
year then ended; and
notes, including material accounting policy
information and other explanatory information.
In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated
financial statements of Infratil Limited (the Company)
and its subsidiaries (the Group) on pages 54 to 118
present fairly in all material respects:
the Group’s financial position as at 31 March
2025 and its financial performance and cash
flows for the year ended on that date;
In accordance with New Zealand Equivalents to
International Financial Reporting Standards (NZ
IFRS) issued by the New Zealand Accounting
Standards Board and the International Financial
Reporting Standards issued by the International
Accounting Standards Board.
Basis for opinion
We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (New Zealand) (ISAs (NZ)). We
believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.
We are independent of Infratil Limited in accordance with Professional and Ethical Standard 1 International Code
of Ethics for Assurance Practitioners (Including International Independence Standards) (New Zealand) issued by
the New Zealand Auditing and Assurance Standards Board and the International Ethics Standards Board for
Accountants’ International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (including International Independence
Standards) (IESBA Code), as applicable to audits of financial statements of public interest entities. We have also
fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with Professional and Ethical Standards 1 and the IESBA
Code.
Our responsibilities under ISAs (NZ)(Revised) are further described in the Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit
of the consolidated financial statements section of our report.
Our firm has also provided other services to the Group in relation to climate related assurance, taxation services,
audit of regulatory disclosures and other assurance and advisory engagements. Subject to certain restrictions,
partners and employees of our firm may also deal with the Group on normal terms within the ordinary course of
trading activities of the business of the Group. These matters have not impaired our independence as auditor of
the Group. The firm has no other relationship with, or interest in, the Group.
Scoping
The Directors, on behalf of the Group, are responsible for:
– the preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance
with NZ IFRS issued by the New Zealand Accounting Standards Board and the International
Financial Reporting Standards issued by the International Accounting Standards Board;
– implementing the necessary internal control to enable the preparation of a consolidated set
of financial statements that is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or
error; and
– assessing the ability of the Group to continue as a going concern. This includes disclosing,
as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of
accounting unless they either intend to liquidate or to cease operations or have no realistic
alternative but to do so.
Our objective is:
– to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are
free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; and
– to issue an independent auditor’s report that includes our opinion.
Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but it is not a guarantee that an audit
conducted in accordance with ISAs NZ will always detect a material misstatement when
it exists.
Misstatements can arise from fraud or error. They are considered material if, individually or in
the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of
users taken on the basis of the consolidated financial statements.
A further description of our responsibilities for the audit of the consolidated financial statements
is located at the External Reporting Board (XRB) website at:
https://www.xrb.govt.nz/standards/assurance-standards/auditors-responsibilities/audit-
report-1-1/
This description forms part of our independent auditor’s report.
The engagement partner on the audit resulting in this independent auditor’s report is Ed Louden.
For and on behalf of:
KPMG
Wellington
25 May 2026
6
The key audit matter How the matter was addressed in our audit
Evaluating revenue transactions either side of the
reporting date to assess if these are recognised in the
correct period.
Other information
The Directors, on behalf of the Group, are responsible for the other information. The other information comprises
information included in the Annual Report, but does not include the financial statements and our auditor’s report
thereon. Other information includes discussion and analysis of the business on pages 1 to 51 and corporate
governance disclosures on pages 126 to 140.
Our opinion on the consolidated financial statements does not cover any other information and we do not
express any form of assurance conclusion thereon.
In connection with our audit of the consolidated financial statements our responsibility is to read the other
information and in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the
consolidated financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit or otherwise appears materially
misstated.
If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude there is a material misstatement of this other information,
we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report in this regard.
Use of this independent auditor’s report
This independent auditor’s report is made solely to the shareholders. Our audit work has been undertaken so
that we might state to the shareholders those matters we are required to state to them in the independent
auditor’s report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, none of KPMG, any entities
directly or indirectly controlled by KPMG, or any of their respective members or employees, accept or assume
any responsibility and deny all liability to anyone other than the shareholders for our audit work, this independent
auditor’s report, or any of the opinions we have formed.
Responsibilities of Directors for the consolidated financial
statements
The Directors, on behalf of the Group, are responsible for:
— the preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with NZ
IFRS issued by the New Zealand Accounting Standards Board and the International Financial Reporting
Standards issued by the International Accounting Standards Board;
— implementing the necessary internal control to enable the preparation of a consolidated set of financial
statements that is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; and
— assessing the ability of the Group to continue as a going concern. This includes disclosing, as
applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless
they either intend to liquidate or to cease operations or have no realistic alternative but to do so.
6
The key audit matter How the matter was addressed in our audit
Evaluating revenue transactions either side of the
reporting date to assess if these are recognised in the
correct period.
Other information
The Directors, on behalf of the Group, are responsible for the other information. The other information comprises
information included in the Annual Report, but does not include the financial statements and our auditor’s report
thereon. Other information includes discussion and analysis of the business on pages 1 to 51 and corporate
governance disclosures on pages 126 to 140.
Our opinion on the consolidated financial statements does not cover any other information and we do not
express any form of assurance conclusion thereon.
In connection with our audit of the consolidated financial statements our responsibility is to read the other
information and in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the
consolidated financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit or otherwise appears materially
misstated.
If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude there is a material misstatement of this other information,
we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report in this regard.
Use of this independent auditor’s report
This independent auditor’s report is made solely to the shareholders. Our audit work has been undertaken so
that we might state to the shareholders those matters we are required to state to them in the independent
auditor’s report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, none of KPMG, any entities
directly or indirectly controlled by KPMG, or any of their respective members or employees, accept or assume
any responsibility and deny all liability to anyone other than the shareholders for our audit work, this independent
auditor’s report, or any of the opinions we have formed.
Responsibilities of Directors for the consolidated financial
statements
The Directors, on behalf of the Group, are responsible for:
— the preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with NZ
IFRS issued by the New Zealand Accounting Standards Board and the International Financial Reporting
Standards issued by the International Accounting Standards Board;
— implementing the necessary internal control to enable the preparation of a consolidated set of financial
statements that is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; and
— assessing the ability of the Group to continue as a going concern. This includes disclosing, as
applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless
they either intend to liquidate or to cease operations or have no realistic alternative but to do so.
6
The key audit matter How the matter was addressed in our audit
Evaluating revenue transactions either side of the
reporting date to assess if these are recognised in the
correct period.
Other information
The Directors, on behalf of the Group, are responsible for the other information. The other information comprises
information included in the Annual Report, but does not include the financial statements and our auditor’s report
thereon. Other information includes discussion and analysis of the business on pages 1 to 51 and corporate
governance disclosures on pages 126 to 140.
Our opinion on the consolidated financial statements does not cover any other information and we do not
express any form of assurance conclusion thereon.
In connection with our audit of the consolidated financial statements our responsibility is to read the other
information and in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the
consolidated financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit or otherwise appears materially
misstated.
If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude there is a material misstatement of this other information,
we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report in this regard.
Use of this independent auditor’s report
This independent auditor’s report is made solely to the shareholders. Our audit work has been undertaken so
that we might state to the shareholders those matters we are required to state to them in the independent
auditor’s report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, none of KPMG, any entities
directly or indirectly controlled by KPMG, or any of their respective members or employees, accept or assume
any responsibility and deny all liability to anyone other than the shareholders for our audit work, this independent
auditor’s report, or any of the opinions we have formed.
Responsibilities of Directors for the consolidated financial
statements
The Directors, on behalf of the Group, are responsible for:
— the preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with NZ
IFRS issued by the New Zealand Accounting Standards Board and the International Financial Reporting
Standards issued by the International Accounting Standards Board;
— implementing the necessary internal control to enable the preparation of a consolidated set of financial
statements that is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; and
— assessing the ability of the Group to continue as a going concern. This includes disclosing, as
applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless
they either intend to liquidate or to cease operations or have no realistic alternative but to do so.
6
The key audit matter How the matter was addressed in our audit
Evaluating revenue transactions either side of the
reporting date to assess if these are recognised in the
correct period.
Other information
The Directors, on behalf of the Group, are responsible for the other information. The other information comprises
information included in the Annual Report, but does not include the financial statements and our auditor’s report
thereon. Other information includes discussion and analysis of the business on pages 1 to 51 and corporate
governance disclosures on pages 126 to 140.
Our opinion on the consolidated financial statements does not cover any other information and we do not
express any form of assurance conclusion thereon.
In connection with our audit of the consolidated financial statements our responsibility is to read the other
information and in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the
consolidated financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit or otherwise appears materially
misstated.
If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude there is a material misstatement of this other information,
we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report in this regard.
Use of this independent auditor’s report
This independent auditor’s report is made solely to the shareholders. Our audit work has been undertaken so
that we might state to the shareholders those matters we are required to state to them in the independent
auditor’s report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, none of KPMG, any entities
directly or indirectly controlled by KPMG, or any of their respective members or employees, accept or assume
any responsibility and deny all liability to anyone other than the shareholders for our audit work, this independent
auditor’s report, or any of the opinions we have formed.
Responsibilities of Directors for the consolidated financial
statements
The Directors, on behalf of the Group, are responsible for:
— the preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with NZ
IFRS issued by the New Zealand Accounting Standards Board and the International Financial Reporting
Standards issued by the International Accounting Standards Board;
— implementing the necessary internal control to enable the preparation of a consolidated set of financial
statements that is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; and
— assessing the ability of the Group to continue as a going concern. This includes disclosing, as
applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless
they either intend to liquidate or to cease operations or have no realistic alternative but to do so.
6
The key audit matter How the matter was addressed in our audit
Evaluating revenue transactions either side of the
reporting date to assess if these are recognised in the
correct period.
Other information
The Directors, on behalf of the Group, are responsible for the other information. The other information comprises
information included in the Annual Report, but does not include the financial statements and our auditor’s report
thereon. Other information includes discussion and analysis of the business on pages 1 to 51 and corporate
governance disclosures on pages 126 to 140.
Our opinion on the consolidated financial statements does not cover any other information and we do not
express any form of assurance conclusion thereon.
In connection with our audit of the consolidated financial statements our responsibility is to read the other
information and in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the
consolidated financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit or otherwise appears materially
misstated.
If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude there is a material misstatement of this other information,
we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report in this regard.
Use of this independent auditor’s report
This independent auditor’s report is made solely to the shareholders. Our audit work has been undertaken so
that we might state to the shareholders those matters we are required to state to them in the independent
auditor’s report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, none of KPMG, any entities
directly or indirectly controlled by KPMG, or any of their respective members or employees, accept or assume
any responsibility and deny all liability to anyone other than the shareholders for our audit work, this independent
auditor’s report, or any of the opinions we have formed.
Responsibilities of Directors for the consolidated financial
statements
The Directors, on behalf of the Group, are responsible for:
— the preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with NZ
IFRS issued by the New Zealand Accounting Standards Board and the International Financial Reporting
Standards issued by the International Accounting Standards Board;
— implementing the necessary internal control to enable the preparation of a consolidated set of financial
statements that is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; and
— assessing the ability of the Group to continue as a going concern. This includes disclosing, as
applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless
they either intend to liquidate or to cease operations or have no realistic alternative but to do so.
7
Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the consolidated
financial statements
Our objective is:
— to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from
material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; and
— to issue an independent auditor’s report that includes our opinion.
Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but it is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in
accordance with ISAs NZ will always detect a material misstatement when it exists.
Misstatements can arise from fraud or error. They are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they
could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of the
consolidated financial statements.
A further description of our responsibilities for the audit of the consolidated financial statements is located at the
External Reporting Board (XRB) website at:
https://www.xrb.govt.nz/standards/assurance-standards/auditors-responsibilities/audit-report-1 -1/
This description forms part of our independent auditor’s report.
The engagement partner on the audit resulting in this independent auditor’s report is Ed Louden.
For and on behalf of:
KPMG
Wellington
27 May 2025
6
The key audit matter How the matter was addressed in our audit
Evaluating revenue transactions either side of the
reporting date to assess if these are recognised in the
correct period.
Other information
The Directors, on behalf of the Group, are responsible for the other information. The other information comprises
information included in the Annual Report, but does not include the financial statements and our auditor’s report
thereon. Other information includes discussion and analysis of the business on pages 1 to 51 and corporate
governance disclosures on pages 126 to 140.
Our opinion on the consolidated financial statements does not cover any other information and we do not
express any form of assurance conclusion thereon.
In connection with our audit of the consolidated financial statements our responsibility is to read the other
information and in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the
consolidated financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit or otherwise appears materially
misstated.
If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude there is a material misstatement of this other information,
we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report in this regard.
Use of this independent auditor’s report
This independent auditor’s report is made solely to the shareholders. Our audit work has been undertaken so
that we might state to the shareholders those matters we are required to state to them in the independent
auditor’s report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, none of KPMG, any entities
directly or indirectly controlled by KPMG, or any of their respective members or employees, accept or assume
any responsibility and deny all liability to anyone other than the shareholders for our audit work, this independent
auditor’s report, or any of the opinions we have formed.
Responsibilities of Directors for the consolidated financial
statements
The Directors, on behalf of the Group, are responsible for:
— the preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with NZ
IFRS issued by the New Zealand Accounting Standards Board and the International Financial Reporting
Standards issued by the International Accounting Standards Board;
— implementing the necessary internal control to enable the preparation of a consolidated set of financial
statements that is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; and
— assessing the ability of the Group to continue as a going concern. This includes disclosing, as
applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless
they either intend to liquidate or to cease operations or have no realistic alternative but to do so.
This independent auditor’s report is made solely to the shareholders. Our audit work has been
undertaken so that we might state to the shareholders those matters we are required to state
to them in the independent auditor’s report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent
permitted by law, none of KPMG, any entities directly or indirectly controlled by KPMG, or any
of their respective members or employees, accept or assume any responsibility and deny all
liability to anyone other than the shareholders for our audit work, this independent auditor’s
report, or any of the opinions we have formed.
Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the consolidated
financial statements
Our objective is:
— to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from
material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; and
— to issue an independent auditor’s report that includes our opinion.
Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but it is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in
accordance with ISAs NZ will always detect a material misstatement when it exists.
Misstatements can arise from fraud or error. They are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they
could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of the
consolidated financial statements.
A further description of our responsibilities for the audit of the consolidated financial statements is located at the
External Reporting Board (XRB) website at:
https://www.xrb.govt.nz/standards/assurance-standards/auditors-responsibilities/audit-report-1-1/
This description forms part of our independent auditor’s report.
The engagement partner on the audit resulting in this independent auditor’s report is Ed Louden.
For and on behalf of:
KPMG
Wellington
25 May 2026
© 2025 KPMG, a New Zealand Partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organization of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited,
a private English company limited by guarantee. All rights reserved.
Document classification: KPMG Confidential
Independent Auditor’s Report
To the shareholders of Infratil Limited (G roup)
Report on the audit of the consolidated financial statements
Opinion
We have audited the accompanying consolidated
financial statements which comprise:
the consolidated statement of financial position as
at 31 March 2025;
the consolidated statements of comprehensive
income, changes in equity and cash flows for the
year then ended; and
notes, including material accounting policy
information and other explanatory information.
In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated
financial statements of Infratil Limited (the Company)
and its subsidiaries (the Group) on pages 54 to 118
present fairly in all material respects:
the Group’s financial position as at 31 March
2025 and its financial performance and cash
flows for the year ended on that date;
In accordance with New Zealand Equivalents to
International Financial Reporting Standards (NZ
IFRS) issued by the New Zealand Accounting
Standards Board and the International Financial
Reporting Standards issued by the International
Accounting Standards Board.
Basis for opinion
We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (New Zealand) (ISAs (NZ)). We
believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.
We are independent of Infratil Limited in accordance with Professional and Ethical Standard 1 International Code
of Ethics for Assurance Practitioners (Including International Independence Standards) (New Zealand) issued by
the New Zealand Auditing and Assurance Standards Board and the International Ethics Standards Board for
Accountants’ International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (including International Independence
Standards) (IESBA Code), as applicable to audits of financial statements of public interest entities. We have also
fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with Professional and Ethical Standards 1 and the IESBA
Code.
Our responsibilities under ISAs (NZ)(Revised) are further described in the Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit
of the consolidated financial statements section of our report.
Our firm has also provided other services to the Group in relation to climate related assurance, taxation services,
audit of regulatory disclosures and other assurance and advisory engagements. Subject to certain restrictions,
partners and employees of our firm may also deal with the Group on normal terms within the ordinary course of
trading activities of the business of the Group. These matters have not impaired our independence as auditor of
the Group. The firm has no other relationship with, or interest in, the Group.
Scoping
The Directors, on behalf of the Group, are responsible for:
– the preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance
with NZ IFRS issued by the New Zealand Accounting Standards Board and the International
Financial Reporting Standards issued by the International Accounting Standards Board;
– implementing the necessary internal control to enable the preparation of a consolidated set
of financial statements that is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or
error; and
– assessing the ability of the Group to continue as a going concern. This includes disclosing,
as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of
accounting unless they either intend to liquidate or to cease operations or have no realistic
alternative but to do so.
Our objective is:
– to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are
free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; and
– to issue an independent auditor’s report that includes our opinion.
Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but it is not a guarantee that an audit
conducted in accordance with ISAs NZ will always detect a material misstatement when
it exists.
Misstatements can arise from fraud or error. They are considered material if, individually or in
the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of
users taken on the basis of the consolidated financial statements.
A further description of our responsibilities for the audit of the consolidated financial statements
is located at the External Reporting Board (XRB) website at:
https://www.xrb.govt.nz/standards/assurance-standards/auditors-responsibilities/audit-
report-1-1/
This description forms part of our independent auditor’s report.
The engagement partner on the audit resulting in this independent auditor’s report is Ed Louden.
For and on behalf of:
KPMG
Wellington
25 May 2026
6
The key audit matter How the matter was addressed in our audit
Evaluating revenue transactions either side of the
reporting date to assess if these are recognised in the
correct period.
Other information
The Directors, on behalf of the Group, are responsible for the other information. The other information comprises
information included in the Annual Report, but does not include the financial statements and our auditor’s report
thereon. Other information includes discussion and analysis of the business on pages 1 to 51 and corporate
governance disclosures on pages 126 to 140.
Our opinion on the consolidated financial statements does not cover any other information and we do not
express any form of assurance conclusion thereon.
In connection with our audit of the consolidated financial statements our responsibility is to read the other
information and in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the
consolidated financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit or otherwise appears materially
misstated.
If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude there is a material misstatement of this other information,
we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report in this regard.
Use of this independent auditor’s report
This independent auditor’s report is made solely to the shareholders. Our audit work has been undertaken so
that we might state to the shareholders those matters we are required to state to them in the independent
auditor’s report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, none of KPMG, any entities
directly or indirectly controlled by KPMG, or any of their respective members or employees, accept or assume
any responsibility and deny all liability to anyone other than the shareholders for our audit work, this independent
auditor’s report, or any of the opinions we have formed.
Responsibilities of Directors for the consolidated financial
statements
The Directors, on behalf of the Group, are responsible for:
— the preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with NZ
IFRS issued by the New Zealand Accounting Standards Board and the International Financial Reporting
Standards issued by the International Accounting Standards Board;
— implementing the necessary internal control to enable the preparation of a consolidated set of financial
statements that is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; and
— assessing the ability of the Group to continue as a going concern. This includes disclosing, as
applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless
they either intend to liquidate or to cease operations or have no realistic alternative but to do so.
6
The key audit matter How the matter was addressed in our audit
Evaluating revenue transactions either side of the
reporting date to assess if these are recognised in the
correct period.
Other information
The Directors, on behalf of the Group, are responsible for the other information. The other information comprises
information included in the Annual Report, but does not include the financial statements and our auditor’s report
thereon. Other information includes discussion and analysis of the business on pages 1 to 51 and corporate
governance disclosures on pages 126 to 140.
Our opinion on the consolidated financial statements does not cover any other information and we do not
express any form of assurance conclusion thereon.
In connection with our audit of the consolidated financial statements our responsibility is to read the other
information and in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the
consolidated financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit or otherwise appears materially
misstated.
If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude there is a material misstatement of this other information,
we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report in this regard.
Use of this independent auditor’s report
This independent auditor’s report is made solely to the shareholders. Our audit work has been undertaken so
that we might state to the shareholders those matters we are required to state to them in the independent
auditor’s report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, none of KPMG, any entities
directly or indirectly controlled by KPMG, or any of their respective members or employees, accept or assume
any responsibility and deny all liability to anyone other than the shareholders for our audit work, this independent
auditor’s report, or any of the opinions we have formed.
Responsibilities of Directors for the consolidated financial
statements
The Directors, on behalf of the Group, are responsible for:
— the preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with NZ
IFRS issued by the New Zealand Accounting Standards Board and the International Financial Reporting
Standards issued by the International Accounting Standards Board;
— implementing the necessary internal control to enable the preparation of a consolidated set of financial
statements that is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; and
— assessing the ability of the Group to continue as a going concern. This includes disclosing, as
applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless
they either intend to liquidate or to cease operations or have no realistic alternative but to do so.
6
The key audit matter How the matter was addressed in our audit
Evaluating revenue transactions either side of the
reporting date to assess if these are recognised in the
correct period.
Other information
The Directors, on behalf of the Group, are responsible for the other information. The other information comprises
information included in the Annual Report, but does not include the financial statements and our auditor’s report
thereon. Other information includes discussion and analysis of the business on pages 1 to 51 and corporate
governance disclosures on pages 126 to 140.
Our opinion on the consolidated financial statements does not cover any other information and we do not
express any form of assurance conclusion thereon.
In connection with our audit of the consolidated financial statements our responsibility is to read the other
information and in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the
consolidated financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit or otherwise appears materially
misstated.
If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude there is a material misstatement of this other information,
we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report in this regard.
Use of this independent auditor’s report
This independent auditor’s report is made solely to the shareholders. Our audit work has been undertaken so
that we might state to the shareholders those matters we are required to state to them in the independent
auditor’s report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, none of KPMG, any entities
directly or indirectly controlled by KPMG, or any of their respective members or employees, accept or assume
any responsibility and deny all liability to anyone other than the shareholders for our audit work, this independent
auditor’s report, or any of the opinions we have formed.
Responsibilities of Directors for the consolidated financial
statements
The Directors, on behalf of the Group, are responsible for:
— the preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with NZ
IFRS issued by the New Zealand Accounting Standards Board and the International Financial Reporting
Standards issued by the International Accounting Standards Board;
— implementing the necessary internal control to enable the preparation of a consolidated set of financial
statements that is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; and
— assessing the ability of the Group to continue as a going concern. This includes disclosing, as
applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless
they either intend to liquidate or to cease operations or have no realistic alternative but to do so.
6
The key audit matter How the matter was addressed in our audit
Evaluating revenue transactions either side of the
reporting date to assess if these are recognised in the
correct period.
Other information
The Directors, on behalf of the Group, are responsible for the other information. The other information comprises
information included in the Annual Report, but does not include the financial statements and our auditor’s report
thereon. Other information includes discussion and analysis of the business on pages 1 to 51 and corporate
governance disclosures on pages 126 to 140.
Our opinion on the consolidated financial statements does not cover any other information and we do not
express any form of assurance conclusion thereon.
In connection with our audit of the consolidated financial statements our responsibility is to read the other
information and in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the
consolidated financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit or otherwise appears materially
misstated.
If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude there is a material misstatement of this other information,
we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report in this regard.
Use of this independent auditor’s report
This independent auditor’s report is made solely to the shareholders. Our audit work has been undertaken so
that we might state to the shareholders those matters we are required to state to them in the independent
auditor’s report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, none of KPMG, any entities
directly or indirectly controlled by KPMG, or any of their respective members or employees, accept or assume
any responsibility and deny all liability to anyone other than the shareholders for our audit work, this independent
auditor’s report, or any of the opinions we have formed.
Responsibilities of Directors for the consolidated financial
statements
The Directors, on behalf of the Group, are responsible for:
— the preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with NZ
IFRS issued by the New Zealand Accounting Standards Board and the International Financial Reporting
Standards issued by the International Accounting Standards Board;
— implementing the necessary internal control to enable the preparation of a consolidated set of financial
statements that is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; and
— assessing the ability of the Group to continue as a going concern. This includes disclosing, as
applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless
they either intend to liquidate or to cease operations or have no realistic alternative but to do so.
6
The key audit matter How the matter was addressed in our audit
Evaluating revenue transactions either side of the
reporting date to assess if these are recognised in the
correct period.
Other information
The Directors, on behalf of the Group, are responsible for the other information. The other information comprises
information included in the Annual Report, but does not include the financial statements and our auditor’s report
thereon. Other information includes discussion and analysis of the business on pages 1 to 51 and corporate
governance disclosures on pages 126 to 140.
Our opinion on the consolidated financial statements does not cover any other information and we do not
express any form of assurance conclusion thereon.
In connection with our audit of the consolidated financial statements our responsibility is to read the other
information and in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the
consolidated financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit or otherwise appears materially
misstated.
If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude there is a material misstatement of this other information,
we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report in this regard.
Use of this independent auditor’s report
This independent auditor’s report is made solely to the shareholders. Our audit work has been undertaken so
that we might state to the shareholders those matters we are required to state to them in the independent
auditor’s report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, none of KPMG, any entities
directly or indirectly controlled by KPMG, or any of their respective members or employees, accept or assume
any responsibility and deny all liability to anyone other than the shareholders for our audit work, this independent
auditor’s report, or any of the opinions we have formed.
Responsibilities of Directors for the consolidated financial
statements
The Directors, on behalf of the Group, are responsible for:
— the preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with NZ
IFRS issued by the New Zealand Accounting Standards Board and the International Financial Reporting
Standards issued by the International Accounting Standards Board;
— implementing the necessary internal control to enable the preparation of a consolidated set of financial
statements that is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; and
— assessing the ability of the Group to continue as a going concern. This includes disclosing, as
applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless
they either intend to liquidate or to cease operations or have no realistic alternative but to do so.
7
Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the consolidated
financial statements
Our objective is:
— to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from
material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; and
— to issue an independent auditor’s report that includes our opinion.
Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but it is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in
accordance with ISAs NZ will always detect a material misstatement when it exists.
Misstatements can arise from fraud or error. They are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they
could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of the
consolidated financial statements.
A further description of our responsibilities for the audit of the consolidated financial statements is located at the
External Reporting Board (XRB) website at:
https://www.xrb.govt.nz/standards/assurance-standards/auditors-responsibilities/audit-report-1 -1/
This description forms part of our independent auditor’s report.
The engagement partner on the audit resulting in this independent auditor’s report is Ed Louden.
For and on behalf of:
KPMG
Wellington
27 May 2025
6
The key audit matter How the matter was addressed in our audit
Evaluating revenue transactions either side of the
reporting date to assess if these are recognised in the
correct period.
Other information
The Directors, on behalf of the Group, are responsible for the other information. The other information comprises
information included in the Annual Report, but does not include the financial statements and our auditor’s report
thereon. Other information includes discussion and analysis of the business on pages 1 to 51 and corporate
governance disclosures on pages 126 to 140.
Our opinion on the consolidated financial statements does not cover any other information and we do not
express any form of assurance conclusion thereon.
In connection with our audit of the consolidated financial statements our responsibility is to read the other
information and in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the
consolidated financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit or otherwise appears materially
misstated.
If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude there is a material misstatement of this other information,
we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report in this regard.
Use of this independent auditor’s report
This independent auditor’s report is made solely to the shareholders. Our audit work has been undertaken so
that we might state to the shareholders those matters we are required to state to them in the independent
auditor’s report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, none of KPMG, any entities
directly or indirectly controlled by KPMG, or any of their respective members or employees, accept or assume
any responsibility and deny all liability to anyone other than the shareholders for our audit work, this independent
auditor’s report, or any of the opinions we have formed.
Responsibilities of Directors for the consolidated financial
statements
The Directors, on behalf of the Group, are responsible for:
— the preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with NZ
IFRS issued by the New Zealand Accounting Standards Board and the International Financial Reporting
Standards issued by the International Accounting Standards Board;
— implementing the necessary internal control to enable the preparation of a consolidated set of financial
statements that is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; and
— assessing the ability of the Group to continue as a going concern. This includes disclosing, as
applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless
they either intend to liquidate or to cease operations or have no realistic alternative but to do so.
This independent auditor’s report is made solely to the shareholders. Our audit work has been
undertaken so that we might state to the shareholders those matters we are required to state
to them in the independent auditor’s report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent
permitted by law, none of KPMG, any entities directly or indirectly controlled by KPMG, or any
of their respective members or employees, accept or assume any responsibility and deny all
liability to anyone other than the shareholders for our audit work, this independent auditor’s
report, or any of the opinions we have formed.
Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the consolidated
financial statements
Our objective is:
— to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from
material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; and
— to issue an independent auditor’s report that includes our opinion.
Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but it is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in
accordance with ISAs NZ will always detect a material misstatement when it exists.
Misstatements can arise from fraud or error. They are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they
could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of the
consolidated financial statements.
A further description of our responsibilities for the audit of the consolidated financial statements is located at the
External Reporting Board (XRB) website at:
https://www.xrb.govt.nz/standards/assurance-standards/auditors-responsibilities/audit-report-1-1/
This description forms part of our independent auditor’s report.
The engagement partner on the audit resulting in this independent auditor’s report is Ed Louden.
For and on behalf of:
KPMG
Wellington
25 May 2026
96
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
© 2025 KPMG, a New Zealand Partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organization of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited,
a private English company limited by guarantee. All rights reserved.
Document classification: KPMG Confidential
Independent Auditor’s Report
To the shareholders of Infratil Limited (G roup)
Report on the audit of the consolidated financial statements
Opinion
We have audited the accompanying consolidated
financial statements which comprise:
the consolidated statement of financial position as
at 31 March 2025;
the consolidated statements of comprehensive
income, changes in equity and cash flows for the
year then ended; and
notes, including material accounting policy
information and other explanatory information.
In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated
financial statements of Infratil Limited (the Company)
and its subsidiaries (the Group) on pages 54 to 118
present fairly in all material respects:
the Group’s financial position as at 31 March
2025 and its financial performance and cash
flows for the year ended on that date;
In accordance with New Zealand Equivalents to
International Financial Reporting Standards (NZ
IFRS) issued by the New Zealand Accounting
Standards Board and the International Financial
Reporting Standards issued by the International
Accounting Standards Board.
Basis for opinion
We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (New Zealand) (ISAs (NZ)). We
believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.
We are independent of Infratil Limited in accordance with Professional and Ethical Standard 1 International Code
of Ethics for Assurance Practitioners (Including International Independence Standards) (New Zealand) issued by
the New Zealand Auditing and Assurance Standards Board and the International Ethics Standards Board for
Accountants’ International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (including International Independence
Standards) (IESBA Code), as applicable to audits of financial statements of public interest entities. We have also
fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with Professional and Ethical Standards 1 and the IESBA
Code.
Our responsibilities under ISAs (NZ)(Revised) are further described in the Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit
of the consolidated financial statements section of our report.
Our firm has also provided other services to the Group in relation to climate related assurance, taxation services,
audit of regulatory disclosures and other assurance and advisory engagements. Subject to certain restrictions,
partners and employees of our firm may also deal with the Group on normal terms within the ordinary course of
trading activities of the business of the Group. These matters have not impaired our independence as auditor of
the Group. The firm has no other relationship with, or interest in, the Group.
Scoping
The Directors, on behalf of the Group, are responsible for:
– the preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance
with NZ IFRS issued by the New Zealand Accounting Standards Board and the International
Financial Reporting Standards issued by the International Accounting Standards Board;
– implementing the necessary internal control to enable the preparation of a consolidated set
of financial statements that is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or
error; and
– assessing the ability of the Group to continue as a going concern. This includes disclosing,
as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of
accounting unless they either intend to liquidate or to cease operations or have no realistic
alternative but to do so.
Our objective is:
– to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are
free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; and
– to issue an independent auditor’s report that includes our opinion.
Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but it is not a guarantee that an audit
conducted in accordance with ISAs NZ will always detect a material misstatement when
it exists.
Misstatements can arise from fraud or error. They are considered material if, individually or in
the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of
users taken on the basis of the consolidated financial statements.
A further description of our responsibilities for the audit of the consolidated financial statements
is located at the External Reporting Board (XRB) website at:
https://www.xrb.govt.nz/standards/assurance-standards/auditors-responsibilities/audit-
report-1-1/
This description forms part of our independent auditor’s report.
The engagement partner on the audit resulting in this independent auditor’s report is Ed Louden.
For and on behalf of:
KPMG
Wellington
25 May 2026
6
The key audit matter How the matter was addressed in our audit
Evaluating revenue transactions either side of the
reporting date to assess if these are recognised in the
correct period.
Other information
The Directors, on behalf of the Group, are responsible for the other information. The other information comprises
information included in the Annual Report, but does not include the financial statements and our auditor’s report
thereon. Other information includes discussion and analysis of the business on pages 1 to 51 and corporate
governance disclosures on pages 126 to 140.
Our opinion on the consolidated financial statements does not cover any other information and we do not
express any form of assurance conclusion thereon.
In connection with our audit of the consolidated financial statements our responsibility is to read the other
information and in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the
consolidated financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit or otherwise appears materially
misstated.
If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude there is a material misstatement of this other information,
we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report in this regard.
Use of this independent auditor’s report
This independent auditor’s report is made solely to the shareholders. Our audit work has been undertaken so
that we might state to the shareholders those matters we are required to state to them in the independent
auditor’s report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, none of KPMG, any entities
directly or indirectly controlled by KPMG, or any of their respective members or employees, accept or assume
any responsibility and deny all liability to anyone other than the shareholders for our audit work, this independent
auditor’s report, or any of the opinions we have formed.
Responsibilities of Directors for the consolidated financial
statements
The Directors, on behalf of the Group, are responsible for:
— the preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with NZ
IFRS issued by the New Zealand Accounting Standards Board and the International Financial Reporting
Standards issued by the International Accounting Standards Board;
— implementing the necessary internal control to enable the preparation of a consolidated set of financial
statements that is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; and
— assessing the ability of the Group to continue as a going concern. This includes disclosing, as
applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless
they either intend to liquidate or to cease operations or have no realistic alternative but to do so.
6
The key audit matter How the matter was addressed in our audit
Evaluating revenue transactions either side of the
reporting date to assess if these are recognised in the
correct period.
Other information
The Directors, on behalf of the Group, are responsible for the other information. The other information comprises
information included in the Annual Report, but does not include the financial statements and our auditor’s report
thereon. Other information includes discussion and analysis of the business on pages 1 to 51 and corporate
governance disclosures on pages 126 to 140.
Our opinion on the consolidated financial statements does not cover any other information and we do not
express any form of assurance conclusion thereon.
In connection with our audit of the consolidated financial statements our responsibility is to read the other
information and in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the
consolidated financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit or otherwise appears materially
misstated.
If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude there is a material misstatement of this other information,
we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report in this regard.
Use of this independent auditor’s report
This independent auditor’s report is made solely to the shareholders. Our audit work has been undertaken so
that we might state to the shareholders those matters we are required to state to them in the independent
auditor’s report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, none of KPMG, any entities
directly or indirectly controlled by KPMG, or any of their respective members or employees, accept or assume
any responsibility and deny all liability to anyone other than the shareholders for our audit work, this independent
auditor’s report, or any of the opinions we have formed.
Responsibilities of Directors for the consolidated financial
statements
The Directors, on behalf of the Group, are responsible for:
— the preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with NZ
IFRS issued by the New Zealand Accounting Standards Board and the International Financial Reporting
Standards issued by the International Accounting Standards Board;
— implementing the necessary internal control to enable the preparation of a consolidated set of financial
statements that is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; and
— assessing the ability of the Group to continue as a going concern. This includes disclosing, as
applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless
they either intend to liquidate or to cease operations or have no realistic alternative but to do so.
6
The key audit matter How the matter was addressed in our audit
Evaluating revenue transactions either side of the
reporting date to assess if these are recognised in the
correct period.
Other information
The Directors, on behalf of the Group, are responsible for the other information. The other information comprises
information included in the Annual Report, but does not include the financial statements and our auditor’s report
thereon. Other information includes discussion and analysis of the business on pages 1 to 51 and corporate
governance disclosures on pages 126 to 140.
Our opinion on the consolidated financial statements does not cover any other information and we do not
express any form of assurance conclusion thereon.
In connection with our audit of the consolidated financial statements our responsibility is to read the other
information and in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the
consolidated financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit or otherwise appears materially
misstated.
If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude there is a material misstatement of this other information,
we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report in this regard.
Use of this independent auditor’s report
This independent auditor’s report is made solely to the shareholders. Our audit work has been undertaken so
that we might state to the shareholders those matters we are required to state to them in the independent
auditor’s report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, none of KPMG, any entities
directly or indirectly controlled by KPMG, or any of their respective members or employees, accept or assume
any responsibility and deny all liability to anyone other than the shareholders for our audit work, this independent
auditor’s report, or any of the opinions we have formed.
Responsibilities of Directors for the consolidated financial
statements
The Directors, on behalf of the Group, are responsible for:
— the preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with NZ
IFRS issued by the New Zealand Accounting Standards Board and the International Financial Reporting
Standards issued by the International Accounting Standards Board;
— implementing the necessary internal control to enable the preparation of a consolidated set of financial
statements that is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; and
— assessing the ability of the Group to continue as a going concern. This includes disclosing, as
applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless
they either intend to liquidate or to cease operations or have no realistic alternative but to do so.
6
The key audit matter How the matter was addressed in our audit
Evaluating revenue transactions either side of the
reporting date to assess if these are recognised in the
correct period.
Other information
The Directors, on behalf of the Group, are responsible for the other information. The other information comprises
information included in the Annual Report, but does not include the financial statements and our auditor’s report
thereon. Other information includes discussion and analysis of the business on pages 1 to 51 and corporate
governance disclosures on pages 126 to 140.
Our opinion on the consolidated financial statements does not cover any other information and we do not
express any form of assurance conclusion thereon.
In connection with our audit of the consolidated financial statements our responsibility is to read the other
information and in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the
consolidated financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit or otherwise appears materially
misstated.
If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude there is a material misstatement of this other information,
we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report in this regard.
Use of this independent auditor’s report
This independent auditor’s report is made solely to the shareholders. Our audit work has been undertaken so
that we might state to the shareholders those matters we are required to state to them in the independent
auditor’s report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, none of KPMG, any entities
directly or indirectly controlled by KPMG, or any of their respective members or employees, accept or assume
any responsibility and deny all liability to anyone other than the shareholders for our audit work, this independent
auditor’s report, or any of the opinions we have formed.
Responsibilities of Directors for the consolidated financial
statements
The Directors, on behalf of the Group, are responsible for:
— the preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with NZ
IFRS issued by the New Zealand Accounting Standards Board and the International Financial Reporting
Standards issued by the International Accounting Standards Board;
— implementing the necessary internal control to enable the preparation of a consolidated set of financial
statements that is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; and
— assessing the ability of the Group to continue as a going concern. This includes disclosing, as
applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless
they either intend to liquidate or to cease operations or have no realistic alternative but to do so.
6
The key audit matter How the matter was addressed in our audit
Evaluating revenue transactions either side of the
reporting date to assess if these are recognised in the
correct period.
Other information
The Directors, on behalf of the Group, are responsible for the other information. The other information comprises
information included in the Annual Report, but does not include the financial statements and our auditor’s report
thereon. Other information includes discussion and analysis of the business on pages 1 to 51 and corporate
governance disclosures on pages 126 to 140.
Our opinion on the consolidated financial statements does not cover any other information and we do not
express any form of assurance conclusion thereon.
In connection with our audit of the consolidated financial statements our responsibility is to read the other
information and in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the
consolidated financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit or otherwise appears materially
misstated.
If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude there is a material misstatement of this other information,
we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report in this regard.
Use of this independent auditor’s report
This independent auditor’s report is made solely to the shareholders. Our audit work has been undertaken so
that we might state to the shareholders those matters we are required to state to them in the independent
auditor’s report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, none of KPMG, any entities
directly or indirectly controlled by KPMG, or any of their respective members or employees, accept or assume
any responsibility and deny all liability to anyone other than the shareholders for our audit work, this independent
auditor’s report, or any of the opinions we have formed.
Responsibilities of Directors for the consolidated financial
statements
The Directors, on behalf of the Group, are responsible for:
— the preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with NZ
IFRS issued by the New Zealand Accounting Standards Board and the International Financial Reporting
Standards issued by the International Accounting Standards Board;
— implementing the necessary internal control to enable the preparation of a consolidated set of financial
statements that is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; and
— assessing the ability of the Group to continue as a going concern. This includes disclosing, as
applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless
they either intend to liquidate or to cease operations or have no realistic alternative but to do so.
7
Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the consolidated
financial statements
Our objective is:
— to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from
material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; and
— to issue an independent auditor’s report that includes our opinion.
Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but it is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in
accordance with ISAs NZ will always detect a material misstatement when it exists.
Misstatements can arise from fraud or error. They are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they
could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of the
consolidated financial statements.
A further description of our responsibilities for the audit of the consolidated financial statements is located at the
External Reporting Board (XRB) website at:
https://www.xrb.govt.nz/standards/assurance-standards/auditors-responsibilities/audit-report-1 -1/
This description forms part of our independent auditor’s report.
The engagement partner on the audit resulting in this independent auditor’s report is Ed Louden.
For and on behalf of:
KPMG
Wellington
27 May 2025
6
The key audit matter How the matter was addressed in our audit
Evaluating revenue transactions either side of the
reporting date to assess if these are recognised in the
correct period.
Other information
The Directors, on behalf of the Group, are responsible for the other information. The other information comprises
information included in the Annual Report, but does not include the financial statements and our auditor’s report
thereon. Other information includes discussion and analysis of the business on pages 1 to 51 and corporate
governance disclosures on pages 126 to 140.
Our opinion on the consolidated financial statements does not cover any other information and we do not
express any form of assurance conclusion thereon.
In connection with our audit of the consolidated financial statements our responsibility is to read the other
information and in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the
consolidated financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit or otherwise appears materially
misstated.
If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude there is a material misstatement of this other information,
we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report in this regard.
Use of this independent auditor’s report
This independent auditor’s report is made solely to the shareholders. Our audit work has been undertaken so
that we might state to the shareholders those matters we are required to state to them in the independent
auditor’s report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, none of KPMG, any entities
directly or indirectly controlled by KPMG, or any of their respective members or employees, accept or assume
any responsibility and deny all liability to anyone other than the shareholders for our audit work, this independent
auditor’s report, or any of the opinions we have formed.
Responsibilities of Directors for the consolidated financial
statements
The Directors, on behalf of the Group, are responsible for:
— the preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with NZ
IFRS issued by the New Zealand Accounting Standards Board and the International Financial Reporting
Standards issued by the International Accounting Standards Board;
— implementing the necessary internal control to enable the preparation of a consolidated set of financial
statements that is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; and
— assessing the ability of the Group to continue as a going concern. This includes disclosing, as
applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless
they either intend to liquidate or to cease operations or have no realistic alternative but to do so.
This independent auditor’s report is made solely to the shareholders. Our audit work has been
undertaken so that we might state to the shareholders those matters we are required to state
to them in the independent auditor’s report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent
permitted by law, none of KPMG, any entities directly or indirectly controlled by KPMG, or any
of their respective members or employees, accept or assume any responsibility and deny all
liability to anyone other than the shareholders for our audit work, this independent auditor’s
report, or any of the opinions we have formed.
Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the consolidated
financial statements
Our objective is:
— to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from
material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; and
— to issue an independent auditor’s report that includes our opinion.
Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but it is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in
accordance with ISAs NZ will always detect a material misstatement when it exists.
Misstatements can arise from fraud or error. They are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they
could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of the
consolidated financial statements.
A further description of our responsibilities for the audit of the consolidated financial statements is located at the
External Reporting Board (XRB) website at:
https://www.xrb.govt.nz/standards/assurance-standards/auditors-responsibilities/audit-report-1-1/
This description forms part of our independent auditor’s report.
The engagement partner on the audit resulting in this independent auditor’s report is Ed Louden.
For and on behalf of:
KPMG
Wellington
25 May 2026
97
Financial performanceInfratil Annual Report
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
DELIVERING
IDEAS THAT
MATTER
97
Infratil Annual ReportCorporate governance
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
98
Corporate governanceInfratil Annual Report
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
ALISON GERRY
Joined
11 July 2014
Last elected
2025 Annual Meeting
Status
Independent
Infratil role
Chair (since May 2022)
Qualifications
BMS(Hons), MAppFin
Experience
Alison has over 35 years’ experience in the
infrastructure and financial services sectors.
She has worked in trading, finance and risk
roles for corporates and financial institutions
in Australia, Asia and London.
Previous roles
Group Treasurer at Lion Nathan. Board roles since
2007 have included NZX, Spark, Vero Insurance,
Kiwibank, and Sharesies NZ. Visiting Fellow at
Macquarie University for the Master of Applied
Finance programme for 12 years.
Current roles outside Infratil
Director of Air New Zealand, Sharesies Australia,
ANZ Group Holdings and Australia and New Zealand
Banking Group Ltd.
JASON BOYES
Joined
1 April 2021
Last elected
2024 Annual Meeting
Status
Non-independent
Infratil role
Chief Executive
Qualifications
BCA, LLB(Hons)
Experience
Jason joined Morrison in 2011 after a 15-year
legal career in corporate finance and M&A in
New Zealand and London.
Previous roles
Executive roles as Head of Legal, Chief Commercial
Officer and Chief Financial Officer for Morrison.
Director of various Infratil portfolio companies
(including CDC and Longroad Energy).
Current roles outside Infratil
Jason has an interest in, and is a partner at, Morrison
which has the Management Agreement with Infratil.
ANDREW CLARK
Joined
1 June 2022
Last elected
2025 Annual Meeting
Status
Independent
Infratil role
Non-executive director, Audit & Risk and
Nomination & Remuneration Committees
Qualifications
MBA, BEng, BSc
Experience
Andrew is an experienced strategist and
transformation executive with over 30 years of
diverse management consulting experience.
Previous roles
Senior roles within the Boston Consulting Group
including CEO of ANZ, CEO of Indonesia, APAC
leader of the Corporate Finance and Industrial
Goods practices, APAC Partner Evaluation Chair.
Chief Transformation Officer at NAB.
Current roles outside Infratil
Chair of RESN: Regional Education Support Network
(Australia).
PAUL GOUGH
Joined
5 December 2012
Last elected
2024 Annual Meeting
Status
Independent
Infratil role
Non-executive director, Manager Engagement
and Nomination & Remuneration Committees
Qualifications
BCom(Hons)
Experience
Paul has over 20 years’ experience in international
acquisitions, investment and fund management.
Previous roles
Corporate finance roles with Credit Suisse in New
Zealand, Australia and London. Director of a range
of transport, infrastructure, fund management and
financial-services related businesses.
Current roles outside Infratil
Managing Partner of European private equity fund
STAR Capital focused on the acquisition and
development of asset-based businesses. Director
of STAR Asset Finance, Rail Operations Group,
V Group, ASL Airlines and FlySafair. Founder and
Partner of SURE Capital, a sustainable urban real
estate investor.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
99
Corporate governanceInfratil Annual Report
Contents
Financial overview
Report of the Chair
Report of the Chief Executive
Management model
Sustainability
Portfolio
Financial performance
Corporate governance
Directory
KIRSTY MACTAGGART
Joined
25 March 2019
Last elected
2025 Annual Meeting
Status
Independent
Infratil role
Non-executive director, Audit & Risk and Nomination
& Remuneration Committees, Chair of Manager
Engagement Committee
Qualifications
BAcc, CA
Experience
Kirsty has over 25 years of global equity market
experience and brings a strong investor perspective
and a focus on governance.
Previous roles
Head of Equity Capital Markets and Corporate
Governance for Fidelity International in Asia.
Managing Director at Citigroup based in Hong Kong
and London.
Current roles outside Infratil
Director of Foundry NZ Limited and Luxury Stays
Limited.
PETER SPRINGFORD
Joined
1 November 2016
Last elected
2023 Annual Meeting
Status
Independent
Infratil role
Non-executive director, Nomination &
Remuneration and Manager Engagement
Committees
Qualifications
MBA
Experience
Peter has extensive experience in managing
companies in Australia, New Zealand and Asia.
Previous roles
President of International Paper (Asia) Limited,
CEO and Managing Director of Carter Holt Harvey
Limited. Chair of Nuplex Industries, Hung Hing
Limited (Hong Kong) and Interplex Holdings Limited
(Singapore). Director of Zespri, Rakon, NZ Refining.
Current roles outside Infratil
Director of several private companies involved in
horticulture, forestry and building
[TRUNCATED]
Data sourced from publicly available filings. Our datasets may not be complete. Automated analysis can produce errors. If you believe any data on this page is incorrect, please contact us at hello@nzxplorer.co.nz. For informational purposes only. Not investment advice.
Other issuers discussed similar conditions around this time
Matched by meaning across NZX announcement text, not keywords — based on our semantic index of announcement bodies.
- TEM — Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust PLC: Statement of Annual Results2026-06-02
“TEM | Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust PLC | 2026-06-02 | FLLYR | Statement of Annual Results…”