GNZ and GNZ Bond Issuer Limited Annual Report
Goodman NZ
Annual Report 2026
GNZ Bond Issuer Limited
Annual Report 2026
Goodman NZ
STRATEGIC
FOCUS
Following the successful completion of the internalisation
in 2024 and bringing our management in-house, we
have strengthened alignment across the business.
Post balance date, on 7 April 2026, following Unitholder
approval on 31 March 2026, Goodman Property Trust
(GMT) transitioned to a corporatised and stapled
structure, GNZ.
Given GNZ’s strategic direction, expanding property
funds
management platform, and increased active
investment opportunities, this structure offers the
most effective framework to support the delivery of
our long-term investment strategy.
Goodman NZ (GNZ), the Stapled Group comprises
Goodman New Zealand Limited (GNZL) and
Goodman Property Services (NZ) Limited (GPS),
and subsidiaries of GNZL and GPS.
Goodman NZ
GNZ
GNZ Bond Issuer Limited
Annual Report 2026
Goodman NZ
Annual Report 2026
54
Goodman NZ
Annual Report 2026
GNZ Bond Issuer Limited
Annual Report 2026
5
Financial and operational highlights 6
Chair’s report 8
Management report 13
FY26 Financial commentary 16
Five-year summary 20
Year In Review
Our business 22
Investment strategy 24
Portfolio statistics 24
Property portfolio and key customers 26
Our People 28
Our Business
Our sustainability strategy 31
Focused on what matters 32
Sustainable properties 34
Corporate performance 36
People and culture 38
Goodman NZ community 40
Sustainability
Climate-related Disclosures 43
Climate-related Disclosures at a glance 44
Governance 46
Risk management 47
Strategy 48
Climate-related risks and opportunities 51
Transition plan 54
Metrics & Targets 56
Independent Assurance Report 75
Climate-Related Disclosures
Goodman NZ
Financial Statements 79
GNZ Bond Issuer Limited
Financial Statements 127
Financial Results
Corporate governance 140
Remuneration report 152
Investor relations 169
Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Index 172
Glossary 174
Business directory 175
Other Information
Contents
This document comprises the Annual Reports of Goodman NZ and
GNZ Bond Issuer Limited for the year ended 31 March 2026 and
contains the information required to be disclosed pursuant to the
NZX Listing Rules. The report includes non-GAAP financial measures
that may not be calculated in a manner consistent with other entities.
Please see the FY26 Financial commentary section of this report for
more information on how these are calculated.
Recorp – aluminium can manufacturer
M20 Business Park
FINANCIAL
AND OPERATIONAL
HIGHLIGHTS
GNZ’s FY26 financial results were delivered in line
with guidance, reflecting strong performance across
the business. GNZ continues to generate underlying
cash flow growth in excess of 5% per annum,
supported by rental reversions exceeding 20%.
NZ Post’s 5 Green Star As Built rated facility
at Roma Road, Mt Roskill.
1
External partners’ share of $632 million.
2
Look-through measure that reflects GNZ’s proportionate share of HLP, the limited partnership that owns Highbrook Business Park.
PROFIT
A F T E R TA X
compared to
$109.6M in FY25
$24 8.0 M
PORTFOLIO
REVALUATION
Increase in property
asset valuations
2
$111.2M
CASH
EARNINGS
5.7% increase
7. 9 8 c p s
TOTAL PORTFOLIO
VA LU E
Including partnership
AUM
1
$4.9BN
LOAN TO VALUE
R AT I O
On a look-through basis
2
19.8%
NET TANGIBLE
ASSET
At 31 March 2026
211.9 cps
CAPITAL
RECYCLED
Through the settlement of the Highbrook
Partnership and the sale of Bush Road Estate
$700M
LEASING
TRANSACTIONS
Space secured on
updated terms
132,522 sqm
DISTRIBUTIONS
DECLARED
5.0% increase
6.825 cps
PORTFOLIO
OCCUPANCY
1.2 million sqm
Total Portfolio size
96.9%
PORTFOLIO
UNDER-RENTING
Potential rent
reversion to market
19.5%
FY27 DIVIDEND
GUIDANCE
5.0% increase
expected
7.1 7 c p s
76
Financial Results
Goodman NZ
Annual Report 2026
GNZ Bond Issuer Limited
Annual Report 2026
ContentsYear in ReviewOur BusinessSustainabilityClimate-related DisclosuresOther InformationYear in Review
GNZ’s solid result reflects the
quality of its warehouse and logistics
portfolio, underpinned by an operating
model that supports sustainable
earnings and distribution growth.
Increased property asset valuations have contributed
to an improved statutory result, with an after-tax profit
of $248.0
million, compared to $109.6 million in FY25,
up 126.3%.
The Board acknowledges this sound financial performance,
and the progress made across GNZ’s strategic initiatives
during the year.
Establishing a complementary property funds management
business, capital recycling, ongoing sustainability efforts, and
more recently effecting a corporatised and stapled structure
for the business have all strengthened our business and
positioned GNZ for sustainable long
-term growth.
Framework to support GNZ’s strategic direction
Post balance date, we completed the transition of Goodman
Property Trust to a corporatised and stapled structure.
Approval from Unitholders was received on 31 March 2026,
reflecting endorsement for our business and support of GNZ’s
strategic direction, growth in our property funds management
platform and a greater level of active investment opportunities.
Bondholders also passed special resolutions on 31 March
2026 to approve amendments to the Bond documents
in connection with GMT’s transition to a corporatised and
stapled structure.
All other conditions to proceed with the transaction were
satisfied prior to 7 April 2026.
John Dakin
Chair and Non-executive Director
CHAIR’S REPORT
Suntory Oceania
uses Laser-guided vehicles (LGVs) at “The Vault”, M20 Business Park.
98
Financial Results
Goodman NZ
Annual Report 2026
GNZ Bond Issuer Limited
Annual Report 2026
ContentsYear in ReviewOur BusinessSustainabilityClimate-related DisclosuresOther InformationYear in Review
The quality and scale of GNZ’s warehouse
and logistics portfolio, together with a proven
development capability, position the business
to deliver sustained earnings growth.
GNZ now has a company structure, like most other businesses
listed on the NZX and the stapled securities are trading on the
NZX under a single ticker code, “GNZ”.
This contemporary corporate structure provides the most
effective framework to support the delivery of GNZ’s long-
term investment strategy while retaining Portfolio Investment
Entity (PIE) status for the investment property portion of
the
business.
With a substantial warehouse and logistics portfolio valued
at $4.9 billion, including external partnership assets under
management, GNZ’s investment strategy remains focused on
high quality real estate in core industrial property markets.
Growth initiatives
The successful launch of the Highbrook Partnership in
September 2025 has been a significant achievement during
the year. GNZ’s capital partners acquired a 28.9% interest
in the limited partnership that now owns Highbrook Business
Park, with GNZ retaining a 71.1% interest.
Establishing a complementary property funds management
business has extended the scope of GNZ’s operations and
enhanced financial flexibility for the business. The Highbrook
Partnership reflects an important first step in building a
property funds management business of scale.
This platform has enabled income diversification and
allowed
GNZ to recycle capital for reinvestment into
higher-yielding opportunities.
Director changes
During the period, Keith Smith retired from the Board
on 25 July 2025 after 20 years of valued service as an
Independent Director, including 13 years as Board Chair.
His tenure included the repositioning of our business as an
industrial property specialist.
Steve Jurkovich joined the Board as an Independent Director
on 1 July 2025. He is CEO of Kiwibank and has over two
decades of leadership and governance experience in
New
Zealand’s financial services sector.
Keith’s retirement and Steve’s appointment maintain the
size of the Board at six directors and, in line with governance
best practice, ensures it continues to have a majority of
Independent Directors.
At the Annual Meeting of GMT on 28 August 2025,
Gregory
Goodman, Steve Jurkovich and I were each
reappointed as
Directors for a further three-years.
We consider the Board’s collective skills, experience and
backgrounds provide balanced oversight and effective
governance of GNZ.
Sustainability overview
Sustainability continues to be embedded within our business
strategy and decision-making. Our focus is on the built
environment and the delivery of sustainable property solutions.
By adopting a robust approach to managing our
environmental, social and governance matters, we ensure
regulatory compliance while contributing to the broader
sustainability efforts across the property sector.
With a commitment to deliver positive outcomes including a
lower carbon and more resilient portfolio, we continue to work
in partnership with all our stakeholders.
Over the last 12 months we have achieved Green Star
Performance ratings
1
across $358 million of properties and
we continued to work towards our FY30 targets which were
adopted last year, including targets for Scope 3 emissions.
Through our partnerships with community organisations,
Goodman NZ Community, our social investment programme
continues to support and strengthen the communities
where
we invest.
You can read more in our FY26 sustainability report and
climate-related disclosures included later in this report.
Roma Road Estate
is home to Signify, NZ Post, Cotton On and Sika.
NZ Blood is a 6 Green Star Built rated building,
Highbrook Business Park.
CUSTOMERS
220+
PROPERTIES
15
FY27 guidance and outlook
The quality and scale of GNZ’s warehouse and logistics
portfolio, together with a proven development capability,
position the business to deliver sustained earnings growth.
Full year cash earnings are expected to grow by around 5%
in
FY27 with dividends for the year expected to be 7.17 cents
per share reflecting a 5% increase on FY26.
A detailed summary of GNZ’s FY26 financial result, including
the calculation of cash earnings is provided on pages 16 to 18.
On behalf of the Board, we thank shareholders for their ongoing
support and investment in GNZ.
John Dakin
Chair and Non-executive Director
1
This rating relates to the New Zealand Green Building Council’s Green Star
Performance Energy & Water pathway, rather than a full building certification
and includes Highbrook assets.
1110
Financial Results
Goodman NZ
Annual Report 2026
GNZ Bond Issuer Limited
Annual Report 2026
ContentsYear in ReviewOur BusinessSustainabilityClimate-related DisclosuresOther InformationYear in Review
With a substantial warehouse and logistics portfolio
valued at $4.9 billion, including external partnership
assets under management, GNZ’s investment
strategy remains focused on high quality real
estate in core industrial property markets.
FY26 financial results were delivered in line with guidance,
reflecting solid performance across the business. GNZ
continues to generate underlying cash earnings growth of
more than 5% per annum, supported by rental reversions
exceeding 20%.
We advanced a number of strategic growth initiatives, including
establishing an investment management platform through
the Highbrook Partnership, securing 5.1 hectares of land on
Felix
Street in Onehunga, and progressing development activity
at Mt Wellington, Waitomokia and Penrose.
GNZ has a modern corporate structure that will facilitate the
delivery of an active business strategy focused on sustainable
earnings growth.
Development is expected to remain a significant component
of GNZ’s business as we expand into the development and
sale of land
-parcel and turn-key assets to meet demand in
markets where investment and owner-occupier opportunities
are limited.
A measured allocation of invested capital into develop-to-sell
opportunities introduces more active income streams, while
remaining modest relative to the scale of GNZ’s core business.
MANAGEMENT
REPORT
James Spence
Chief Executive Officer
Andy Eakin
Chief Financial Officer
INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL SPACE
Developed by GNZ over the past 10 years
400,000 sqm
LEASING TRANSACTIONS SECURED
132,522 sqm
CAPITAL RECYCLED
$700M
Mt Wellington Estate
Stage One – artist impression.
GNZ’s Core Portfolio has performed well and delivered
positive leasing results with 132,522 sqm of space secured
on updated terms. Average portfolio occupancy of 97.7%
was achieved throughout the year, with a weighted average
lease term of 4.9 years at 31 March 2026.
Rent reviews and new leasing has contributed to like-for like
rental growth of 5.3%. Consistent with independent valuers’
assessments, the potential rent reversion within the portfolio
remains significant at around 19.5% which GNZ expects to
capture over time.
Strong balance sheet capacity supports
growth
Prudent financial management has continued to support
GNZ’s sustainable growth.
During the period, nearly $700 million of capital was recycled,
reducing GNZ’s look
-t
hrough loan
-t
o
-v
alue ratio to 19.8%,
with committed gearing at 24.0%.
We remain focused on maintaining a strong capital position,
with ample forward-looking capacity to capture opportunities,
particularly in an environment of increasing capital scarcity.
Reflecting GNZ pursuing more active earnings opportunities,
our preferred look-through gearing range has been
broadened to 15-30%, lowering the minimum from 20%
while maintaining the upper limit at 30%.
1312
Financial Results
Goodman NZ
Annual Report 2026
GNZ Bond Issuer Limited
Annual Report 2026
ContentsYear in ReviewOur BusinessSustainabilityClimate-related DisclosuresOther InformationYear in Review
We continue to execute our targeted development strategy to deliver new product
into prime Auckland industrial locations with limited new supply. GNZ has a significant
development pipeline within the Value Add portfolio that supports a broad range of
flexible property requirements.
NXP Business Supplies
Highbrook Business Park
Wiggins and Waterco
Highbrook Business Park
Development update
During the period, we progressed our development
programme, commencing the first stage of regeneration at
our Mt Wellington estate. Demolition and enabling works are
complete and above ground construction is now underway.
The multi
-un
it, build-to-lease development will provide around
21,850 sqm of high-quality, Green Star rated warehouse
space. The project remains on schedule for completion in the
first half of 2027. Work on site is advancing, with foundations
and the structural frame progressing.
Development plans at Felix Street in Onehunga are
well progressed, with the $53.5 million acquisition now
settled. Featuring a combination of multi-un
it buildings and
standalone facilities, the estate is being designed to high
specification and targeting a 5 Green Star rating. Works
are planned to commence in the second half of FY27. The
project represents a unique opportunity for owner-occupiers,
investors and lessees, providing flexibility to accommodate a
broad range of modern warehousing requirements.
At Penrose Industrial Estate, we continue to prepare the site for
data centre use and have committed to preliminary design and
infrastructure works. Our focus remains on key workstreams
to have a development-ready site with power and design
flexibility to provide optionality to meet the requirements of
data centre customers. With a works agreement for a 32MVA
power connection now signed, we anticipate an on-site power
connection in the first half of 2028.
We believe New
Zealand is well positioned to capture
data centre investment supported by a strong renewable
electricity grid and growing demand for digital infrastructure.
Our investment at Penrose reflects a disciplined, staged
approach that is consistent with our broader capital
allocation.
At Waitomokia in Māngere, earthworks are progressing
with the first development site ready for above ground
construction in the second half of FY27.
On-market buyback
In February 2026, a $125 million on market buyback was
launched. $15.9 million of shares were purchased before
Balance Date, at a weighted average price of $1.94, an 8.3%
discount to NTA at 31 March 2026.
A buyback of Stapled Shares at current prices presents an
attractive risk adjusted return, offering a well-defined, value
driven opportunity, accretive to both net tangible assets and
cash earnings per share.
The buyback programme is strongly aligned with our
investment strategy, and we will seek shareholder approval
for
the continuation of the buyback at GNZ’s Annual
Shareholder Meeting later in 2026. Shareholder approval
of the buyback will ensure that the buyback does not result
in any shareholder being forced to sell as a result of the
Takeovers Code. The final terms of the buyback will be
detailed in the Notice of Meeting.
Our current projects are progressing well, and we continue to actively assess
opportunities including options to undertake develop-to-sell projects which we
expect to further support earnings growth.
James Spence Andy Eakin
Chief Executive Officer
C
hief Financial Officer
Sustainable growth
While broader geopolitical and economic volatility continues
to impact activity over the short to medium term, GNZ’s
investment strategy is well supported by substantial balance
sheet capacity and a disciplined approach to capital allocation.
Executing on strategic initiatives during the year including the
establishment of our property funds management business
has extended the scope of our operations and enhanced
financial flexibility for the business.
Supply
-constrained Auckland industrial locations reinforce
the execution of our targeted strategy to deliver new product.
Our in-house expertise, proven track record and GNZ’s in-
built development pipeline of more than $1 billion underpins
future opportunities.
1514
Financial Results
Goodman NZ
Annual Report 2026
GNZ Bond Issuer Limited
Annual Report 2026
ContentsYear in ReviewOur BusinessSustainabilityClimate-related DisclosuresOther InformationYear in Review
FY26
FINANCIAL
COMMENTARY
It has been a successful FY26, with GNZ’s financial
performance demonstrating that it is a robust and resilient
business. The Highbrook Partnership has strengthened
the balance sheet and supported income diversification.
PROFIT BEFORE
TA X
$258.4m
PROFIT
A F T E R TA X
$24 8.0m
CASH
EARNINGS
7. 9 8 c p s
DISTRIBUTIONS
6.825 cps
Strong balance sheet
During the period, nearly $700 million of capital was recycled.
At 31 March 2026, GNZ had a balance sheet committed
gearing of 16.2%. On a look-through basis, incorporating its
71.1% proportionate share of the Highbrook Partnership,
GNZ’s loan to value ratio was 19.8% with committed gearing
o f 24.0%.
These capital inflows also enabled a restructuring of GNZ’s
bank debt facilities. With $700 million retained in wholesale
and retail bonds, bank debt was fully repaid and undrawn
facilities reduced to $95 million. GNZ has substantial liquidity
with cash balances (including short-term deposits) of more
than $485 million.
GNZ Bond Issuer Limited
GNZ Bond Issuer Limited received $26.9 million of interest
income (FY25 $23.8 million) and incurred $26.9 million of
interest expense (FY25 $23.8 million).
The increase on the previous year reflects the full year of
interest on the $150 million wholesale green bond issued on
8 October 2024.
S&P Global Ratings Australia Pty Limited, which rates each
series of Bonds, maintained the credit rating of all bonds
issued by GNZ Bond Issuer Limited at BBB+. This is one
notch higher than GNZ’s investment grade credit rating of
BBB/stable that was assigned following the completion of the
corporatisation and stapling transaction in April 2026.
No dividends or distributions have been paid by GNZ Bond
Issuer Limited.
Robust financial performance with increased
statutory
result
The strength of GNZ’s operating performance reflects the
quality of its warehouse and logistics portfolio, delivering a
statutory profit after tax of $248.0 million. This compares
with $109.6 million in FY25.
New fee revenue stream from the Highbrook Partnership
is contributing to a 3.6% increase in operating earnings
before tax, to $159.8 million. Operating earnings after tax of
$127.6
million, compared to $125.0 million in FY25, up 2.1%.
Net interest costs have significantly decreased with bank
debt repaid and cash deposits generating interest income.
This offsets increases from higher interest expense on
lease liabilities and lower borrowings costs capitalised to
developments. GNZ’s weighted average cost of debt was
4.2% for FY26, compared to 4.8% in the prior year
In FY26 GNZ recorded a revaluation uplift with $111.2 million
of fair value gains. This includes GNZ’s share of revaluations
in HLP, the limited partnership that owns Highbrook Business
Park and compared to fair value gains of $11.1 million in
FY25. This increase in property valuations, in addition to a
positive movement in the fair value of financial instruments
within HLP, have contributed to the uplift in profit after tax.
At 31 March 2026, GNZ’s total properties under management
are valued at $4.9 billion.
Net tangible assets have increased 9.7 cents per share from
31 March 2025 to 211.9 cents per share.
Cotton On
Roma Road Estate
William Main, Development Director, and Stephanie Clarkson,
Development Project Manager, at the Mt Wellington Estate.
KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
FY26F Y25
Profit before tax $258.4m$130.9m
Profit after tax $248.0 m$109.6 m
Property asset revaluation gain
1
$111.2m$11.1m
Operating earnings per share before tax 10.39 cps10.03 cps
Operating earnings per share after tax
2
8.29 cps8.12 cps
Cash earnings
3
7.98 cps7.55 cps
Cash distribution 6.825 cps6.50 cps
Loan to value ratio
4
19.8%31.8%
Net tangible assets 211.9 c p s202.2 cps
1
Includes GNZ’s share of HLP revaluations, the limited partnership that owns Highbrook Business Park.
2
Operating earnings is a non-GAAP financial measure included to provide an assessment of the performance of GNZ’s principal operating activities.
The calculation is set out in note 5.1 of GNZ’s 2026 Financial Statements.
3
Cash earnings is a non-GAAP financial measure that assesses free cash flow, on a per share basis, after adjusting for certain items. Calculation of
GNZ’s cash earnings is set out on page 18.
4
Loan to value ratio is a non-GAAP financial measure used to assess the strength of GNZ’s balance sheet. Look-through measure that reflects GNZ’s
proportionate share of HLP.
1716
Financial Results
Goodman NZ
Annual Report 2026
GNZ Bond Issuer Limited
Annual Report 2026
ContentsYear in ReviewOur BusinessSustainabilityClimate-related DisclosuresOther InformationYear in Review
CASH EARNINGS
AND DISTRIBUTIONS
Cash earnings is our preferred measure of underlying
operating performance. This is a non-GAAP financial
measure that assesses free cash flow, on a per share basis,
after adjusting for certain items. The calculation is set out
in
the table below.
Cash earnings of 7.98 cents per share was consistent
with market guidance for the full year of around 8.0 cents
per share increasing 5.7% on a like-for-like basis, from
7.55
cents per share.
Cash distributions totalled 6.825 cents per share for FY26,
5% higher than FY25. The level of distributions represents
85.5% of cash earnings.
Full year cash earnings are expected to grow by around
5% in FY27 with dividends for the year expected to be
7.17 cents per share, reflecting a 5% increase on FY26,
with all expected to be paid from GNZL.
CASH EARNINGS $m
FY26F Y25% change
Operating earnings before tax 159.8154.33.6
Current tax on operating earnings (32.2)(29.3)(9.9)
Operating earnings after tax 1 2 7. 6125.02.1
Share based payment expense4.21.2250
Straight line rent adjustments – GNZ and HLP(4.5)(5.0)10.0
Capitalised borrowing costs on land(0.5)( 0 .7 )28.6
Maintenance capex – GNZ and HLP(3.4)(4.3)20.9
Fee and underwrite adjustment( 0 .7 )––
Cash earnings 1 2 2 .7116.25.6
Weighted shares on issue (million) 1,538.31,538.8(0.03)
Cash earnings per share (cps)7. 9 87. 5 55.7
Distributions per share (cps)6.8256.505.0
Distributions % of cash earnings85.5%8 6 .1%( 0 .7 )
OPERATING
EARNINGS
A F T E R TA X
$ 1 2 7. 6 M
CASH
EARNINGS
$122.7M
CASH
EARNINGS
CENTS
7. 9 8 c p s
NXP Business Supplies
Highbrook Business Park
1918
Financial Results
Goodman NZ
Annual Report 2026
GNZ Bond Issuer Limited
Annual Report 2026
ContentsYear in ReviewOur BusinessSustainabilityClimate-related DisclosuresOther InformationYear in Review
FIVE-YEAR SUMMARY
$ millionFY26F Y25F Y24F Y23F Y22
Net property income 184.5230.520 3.117 7. 01 5 7. 1
Fee income 10.8 – – – –
Share of HLP operating earnings 22.3 ––––
Net interest costs(39.8)(6 4.1)( 4 6 .7 )(29.5)( 1 9 .7 )
Net corporate costs (including Manager’s base fee)(13.8)(10.9)(20.8)(21.0)(19.1)
Share based payment expense (4.2)(1.2)– – –
Operating earnings before other income/(expenses)
and
income tax
159.8 154.3135.6126.5118.3
Movement in fair value of investment property5 9 .7 11.1(478.4)( 2 3 7.7 )660.4
Movement in fair value of financial instruments ( 7. 0 )( 17. 1 )(8.2)(14.8)0.8
Movement in valuation of pre-existing employee benefits (10.3)( 1 3 .7 )– – –
Transitional services (1.1)(1.1)– – –
Transaction costs & internalisation transaction(5.1)(2.6)(275.5) – –
Share of other income from associates62.4 – –– –
Manager’s performance fee expected to be reinvested in units –– – – (15.7)
Profit/(loss) before tax 258.4 130.9(626.5)(126.0)763.8
Current tax on operating earnings(32.2) (29.3)(14.2)(15.4)(19.0)
Current tax on non-operating earnings1.64.21 5 .7–4.4
Deferred tax less tax losses utilised20.23.86 0.16.0(0.6)
Profit/(loss) after tax248.0109.6(564.9)(135.4)74 8 .6
Operating earnings before tax per share (cps)10.39 10.039.659.018.47
Operating earnings after tax per share (cps)8.29 8.128.6 47. 9 27. 1 1
Cash earnings per share (cps)7. 9 8 7. 5 57. 1 87. 1 06.66
Cash distributions per share (cps) 6.8256.506.205.905.50
Distributions % of cash earnings85.586.186.483.182.6
Balance sheet
Investment property 2,671.5 4,689.14,533.94 ,7 91. 24 ,7 73 . 2
Investment in associates974 . 9 ––––
Total assets4,221.4 4 ,78 5. 44 ,716 . 94,853.94,814.3
Total liabilities 9 7 7. 8 1,6 74 . 41 , 6 17. 81,413.21,156.9
Total equity 3,243.6 3,111.03,0 99.13 , 4 4 0 .73 , 6 5 7. 4
Loan to value ratio (%)19.8 31.831.525.921.3
NTA per share (cps)211.9 202.2201.4245.2260.6
Share price at 31 March (cents)189.51 8 7. 0228.0214.0236.0
Total Portfolio
Total property portfolio value 4,861.24,689.1 4,535.3 4 ,7 91. 2 4 ,7 73 . 2
Net lettable area (sqm)1 ,17 3 ,7 5 5 1,209,581 1,152,5461 , 0 7 7, 4 7 31,071,0 0 4
Weighted average capitalisation rate (%) 5.9 5.96.05.24.2
Investment portfolio occupancy (%) 97 99999999
Weighted average lease term (years) 4.9 5.66.26.46.3
Customers 221220209235226
PROFITLOSS BEFORE TAX
$ million
()
()
---
F Y
F Y
F Y
F Y
F Y
NTA
cps
050100150200250
FY
FY
FY
FY
FY
TOTAL EQUITY
$ million
01000200030004000
F Y
F Y
F Y
F Y
F Y
TOTAL PROPERTY PORTFOLIO VALUE
$ million
010002000300040005000
F Y
F Y
F Y
F Y
F Y
OPERATING EARNINGS BEFORE TAX
$ million
050100150200250
F Y
F Y
F Y
F Y
F Y
LOAN TO VALUE RATIO
%
010203040
F Y
F Y
F Y
F Y
F Y
PROFITLOSS AFTER TAX
$ million
()
()
---
F Y
F Y
F Y
F Y
F Y
CASH EARNINGS
cps
02468
F Y
F Y
F Y
F Y
F Y
2120
Financial Results
Goodman NZ
Annual Report 2026
GNZ Bond Issuer Limited
Annual Report 2026
ContentsYear in ReviewOur BusinessSustainabilityClimate-related DisclosuresOther InformationYear in Review
2322
Financial Results
Goodman NZ
Annual Report 2026
GNZ Bond Issuer Limited
Annual Report 2026
ContentsYear in ReviewOur BusinessSustainabilityClimate-related DisclosuresOther Information
OUR
BUSINESS
WHO WE ARE
GNZ’s $4.9 billion urban logistics portfolio
provides essential supply chain infrastructure,
facilitating the efficient storage and distribution
of goods and materials, and the digital services
we rely
on.
GNZ is managed by a dedicated team of
over 70 professionals, who are responsible
for all business activities and stakeholder
relationships. Our values reflect innovation,
determination, integrity and sustainability –
and we strive to make space for greatness in
everything we do.
WHAT WE DO
GNZ invests in well-located, warehouse and
logistics facilities in Auckland, New Zealand’s
gateway city.
By owning, developing and managing high-
quality properties in key locations close to
transport networks and digital infrastructure,
we
provide customers with facilities that help
their businesses succeed.
Through our funds management business, we
manage real estate on behalf of capital partners
and we may acquire selective acquisitions for
resale, undertake develop-to-sell projects, or
engage in land subdivision.
OUR PURPOSE
Making space for greatness describes our
purpose. It recognises our stakeholders’
needs
and drives us to help them reach their
full potential, whether they are team members,
customers, investors, suppliers or community
partners.
OUR SUSTAINABILITY
COMMITMENT
As a leading property investment group, our
focus is on the built environment and the
delivery of more sustainable and resource
efficient property solutions for our
customers.
We acknowledge the impacts of climate change
and are taking action to reduce greenhouse
gas (GHG) emissions and develop green
buildings. We also partner with organisations to
strengthen our local communities and enable
long-term positive
change.
OWN
We invest in well-located and
operationally efficient, warehouse
and
logistics facilities in Auckland.
DEVELOP
Our strategic land holdings and
proven development capability
enable us to deliver sustainable
properties to lease or sell.
MANAGE
We manage all aspects of
our business directly, taking
responsibility for all our
stakeholder relationships.
Ranked in the top 20 of all stocks on
the NZX by market capitalisation,
GNZ is New Zealand’s largest listed
property investment group. With
a history spanning 25 years, it is a
successful business built around a
substantial portfolio, a wide customer
base, a proven development
capability, and a committed team.
Our Business
Fackelmann
Highbrook Business Park
GNZ STRATEGY
INVESTMENT
+
GNZ’s conviction on the Auckland
industrial market remains strong.
As New Zealand’s key gateway
city, Auckland is a critical
distribution hub servicing the
country’s largest population
+
Following global trends, infill
markets remain land constrained
with limited new supply, creating
significant barriers to entry,
and making the GNZ portfolio
increasingly difficult to
replicate
+
Active portfolio optimisation
through disciplined capital
recycling
+
With significant under renting
following 30% market rental
growth over the last 5 years
– GNZ’s high quality portfolio
is producing underlying cash
earnings growth in excess of
5% per annum
DEVELOPMENT
+
GNZ’s in-house team brings deep
expertise across planning, design
and delivery, supporting intricate
projects and site regeneration
+
Track record of over
400,000 sqm of industrial and
commercial space developed
over the past 10 years
+
Development pipeline exceeding
$1 billion across develop-to-hold
and develop-to-sell opportunities
+
The development programme
is expected to increasingly shift
towards infrastructure, supporting
growing power demands of
automated warehousing and
potential data centre uses
FUNDS
MANAGEMENT
+
With a significant portfolio of
assets, access to Goodman
Group’s global relationships,
a proven track record of
managing partnerships and local
operational expertise, GNZ has
the foundation to build a funds
management platform of scale
+
The successful establishment of
the Highbrook Partnership has
created a scalable platform that
diversifies revenue and unlocks
access to third party capital
+
Growth in our property funds
management business will further
broaden revenue streams and
enhance capital deployment
flexibility
INVESTMENT STRATEGY
PORTFOLIO
STATISTICS
GNZ’s urban logistics portfolio provides
essential supply chain infrastructure
for more than 220 customers.
TOTAL PORTFOLIO
SIZE
Net lettable area1.2m sqm
TOTAL PORTFOLIO
VA LU E
Including partnership AUM$4.9 BN
CAPITALISATION
R AT E
Weighted average5.9%
AV ER AG E
BUILDING AGE
Core Portfolio13.0 yrs
AV ER AG E
LEASE TERM
Weighted average4.9 yrs
R E N TA L
GROWTH
On a like-for-like basis5.3%
AV ER AG E
OCCUPANCY
Over the last 12 months9 7.7 %
CUSTOMERS
Employing 10,000+ people220+
WAITOMOKIA
WESTNEY
ROMA
FAVO N A
THE GATE
FELIXCONNECT
SAVILL LINK
ŌTĀHUHU
LEONARD
PENROSE
M20
HIGHBROOK
TĀMAKI
MT WELLINGTON
2524
Financial Results
Goodman NZ
Annual Report 2026
GNZ Bond Issuer Limited
Annual Report 2026
ContentsYear in ReviewOur BusinessSustainabilityClimate-related DisclosuresOther InformationOur Business
Property and key customersLocationClassification
Market Cap
RateNLA (sqm)Buildings
Occupancy
%
WALT
years
Highbrook Business Park
NZ Post, Freightways,
DHL, OfficeMax
East Tāmaki Core 5 . 0 –7. 54 96,524 78 974.0
Savill Link
Mainfreight,
NZ National Logistics,
Coda
Ōtāhuhu C o re/ Va l u e Ad d5.38–6.38162,6 08 16 944.4
M20 Business Park
Recorp, Suntory,
Ingram Micro
Wiri Core/Value Add 5 . 1 3 –7. 2 5122,020 13 965.5
Westney Industry Park
Fliway, DSL, Linfox
Māngere Core 6 .7 5 – 9 . 0114,96 9 11 10 05.2
The Gate Industry Park
Essity Australasia,
Oji Fibre Solutions
Penrose Core/Value Add 5.4–6.25102,155 18 944.0
Roma Road Estate
NZ Post, Cotton On
Mt Roskill Core 5.0-5.6344,282 4 10 012.3
Favona Road Estate
Mainfreight
Māngere Core 5 .7 5 – 6 . 539,658 3 10 011.2
Penrose Industrial Estate
Winstone Wallboards,
Independent Traffic Control
Penrose Value Add 6.025,803 12 10 03.0
Tāmaki Estate
Containerco, Camelspace
Panmure Value Add 6 .7 52 3,6 74 7 951 .7
Connect Industrial Estate
Fletcher Building
Penrose Value Add 6.2521,0 02 7 10 05 .7
Leonard Road Estate
Sky Network Television
Mt Wellington Value Add 6.8815,0 4 8 3 964.6
Mt Wellington Estate
Tesla, Acrow
Mt Wellington Value Add n /a6,011 2 10 00.4
Great South Road Estate
Sleepyhead
Ōtāhuhu Value Add 6 .7 5– 1 10 01.6
Look-through portfolio
1
1 , 17 3 ,75 5 175 96.9%4.9
1
Weighted based on GNZ’s ownership interest except for NLA which reflects total unweighted lettable area and building count.
PROPERTY PORTFOLIO
AND KEY CUSTOMERS
2726
Financial Results
Goodman NZ
Annual Report 2026
GNZ Bond Issuer Limited
Annual Report 2026
ContentsYear in ReviewOur BusinessSustainabilityClimate-related DisclosuresOther InformationOur Business
BOARD OF DIRECTORSEXECUTIVES
James Spence
Chief Executive Officer
James is Chief Executive Officer. He is responsible
for delivering GNZ’s investment strategy and
managing all other business functions. James
joined Goodman in 2006 and has around 20 years
of corporate, property and funds management
experience in Europe and New Zealand. James
holds a Bachelor of Property from the University of
Auckland as well as a Graduate Diploma in Applied
Finance from Kaplan Education in Australia.
Andy Eakin
Chief Financial Officer
Andy’s role as Chief Financial Officer involves
managing the finance and treasury activities of
GNZ. He is also the Chair of the ESG Committee
which encompasses ESG matters material to
GNZ including providing sustainability leadership
across the business. Andy joined Goodman in
March 2011, has more than 30 years’ experience in
finance roles in Ireland, Scotland and New Zealand,
and is a Fellow of Chartered Accountants Ireland.
Anton Shead
General Counsel and Company Secretary
Anton is responsible for the provision of legal and
compliance support to the business. With a Bachelor
of Commerce and Bachelor of Laws (Hons) from
the University of Auckland, Anton has over 25
years’ legal experience. Prior to joining Goodman,
Anton worked for Bell Gully. Anton has also worked
for international law firm Herbert Smith LLP in its
London office, Carey Olsen, a specialist corporate
law firm in the Channel Islands and Buddle Findlay.
John Dakin
Chair and Non-Executive Director
John’s career in the property industry spans over 30 years
and he has developed extensive experience across the real
estate, funds management and corporate sectors. John
joined Goodman Group in 2004 and along with his role as
Chair of GNZ he is also a member of the Group Operations
Committee and a Director of the Goodman Foundation.
He holds a Bachelor of Commerce (VPM) from Lincoln
University and a Graduate Diploma in Applied Finance
and Investment from the Australian Securities Institute.
David Gibson
Deputy Chair and Independent Director
David is a professional director and investor. His
current directorships include Contact Energy Limited
and Freightways Limited. David has over 25 years’
corporate finance and capital markets experience
having held senior positions and governance roles with
Deutsche Craigs and Deutsche Bank, in New Zealand.
He holds a Bachelor of Laws (Honours) and Bachelor
of Commerce from the University of Canterbury.
Kimberley Richards
Director – Investment Management
and Capital Transactions
Kimberley is the Director of Investment Management
and Capital Transactions, responsible for the
acquisitions and disposals of GNZ and its Funds
Management business. She has over 20 years’
experience and previously worked in London
for Europa Capital covering transactions across
Northern Europe. Kimberley holds a Bachelor of
Commerce and a Bachelor of Property from the
University of Auckland as well as a Masters in Real
Estate Finance from the University of Cambridge, UK.
Mandy Waldin
Marketing Director
As Marketing Director, Mandy is responsible for
branding and marketing. Mandy has almost 30 years’
experience in brand development and marketing,
holding various senior management positions in
electronics, publishing and office products sectors.
She was co-owner and director of a marketing &
graphic design company where she developed and
implemented communication strategies for various
NZX listed companies. Mandy has a Bachelor
of Business Studies from Massey University.
Mike Gimblett
General Manager – Development
As General Manager Development, Mike is
responsible for GNZ’s development programme,
including stakeholder relationships. With 25 years
of experience in the property industry, Mike has
a proven track record in leasing, project delivery,
and managing complex transactions. Since joining
Goodman in 2005, Mike has held various roles
within acquisition, portfolio management, and
development management. He holds a Bachelor
of Business Studies in Property Management
and Valuation from Massey University.
Evan Sanders
General Manager – Property Services
Evan is the General Manager of Property
Services. His key responsibilities include leading
the property services team and overseeing the
management of GNZ’s substantial property
portfolio. Evan joined the business in 2009 and
has over 18 years’ experience in the property
industry, including roles in property finance and
investment. He has a Business Administration
degree from the University of Bath, UK.
Sophie Bowden
General Manager – People
Sophie is General Manager People. She works
with the leadership team to implement strategic
people and culture initiatives, with a focus on
performance and development, diversity and
inclusion, and employee experience. Sophie
joined Goodman in August 2021 having held HR
roles in FMCG and retail. She has a Bachelor of
Commerce from the University of Auckland.
Laurissa Cooney
Chair, Audit and Risk Committee
and Independent Director
Laurissa is a professional director with extensive experience
in both governance and finance. Her current directorships
include Independent Director for Air New Zealand Limited,
Rabobank NZ Limited and Metlifecare Ltd. She is also
Co-Chair for Aotearoa Circle, a committee member of
the Chapter Zero NZ steering group and Chair of Ngai
Tai Ki Tāmaki Audit & Risk Committee. Prior to these
governance roles Laurissa was Chief Financial Officer
of Te Whare Wānanga o Awanuiārangi. Her professional
career has also included senior auditing and consulting
roles with Deloitte. She holds a Bachelor of Management
Studies (Hons) from Waikato University, is a Fellow of
the Chartered Accountants Australia and New Zealand
and a Chartered Member of the Institute of Directors.
Leonie Freeman
Independent Director
Leonie is the CEO of the Property Council New Zealand.
Prior to this she has been an entrepreneur, business futurist
and speaker who has broad experience across a range of
property disciplines having held senior development, property
management, strategic and education roles. Her 35-year
career has also included advisory positions with local and
central government. Leonie holds a Masters of Commerce
(Hons) and has previously held board positions with the
New Zealand Institute of Valuers, the Massey University
Property Foundation and Government Property Services.
Steve Jurkovich
Independent Director
Steve is a banking executive with over two decades of
leadership and governance experience in New Zealand’s
financial services sector. Chief Executive of Kiwibank
since July 2018, his career has also included senior
positions with ASB, Commonwealth Bank and Westpac.
Steve practiced as a commercial lawyer for six years
before moving into banking. He holds an Executive MBA
from the University of Sydney and Bachelor of Laws
from the University of Otago. Steve is a Founding Trustee
of the Tania Dalton Foundation Charitable Trust and a
Board Member of the Banking Ombudsman Service.
Gregory Goodman
Non-Executive Director
Gregory is the Chief Executive Officer of Goodman Group
and is responsible for Goodman’s overall operations and
the implementation of its strategic plan. He has over 30
years of experience in the property industry with significant
expertise in the industrial property arena. Gregory was
a co-founder of Goodman, playing an integral role in
establishing its specialist global position in the property
market through various corporate transactions, including
takeovers, mergers and acquisitions. He is a director of GNZ
and director and/or representative on other subsidiaries,
management companies and Partnerships of Goodman.
2928
Financial Results
Goodman NZ
Annual Report 2026
GNZ Bond Issuer Limited
Annual Report 2026
ContentsYear in ReviewOur BusinessSustainabilityClimate-related DisclosuresOther Information
Our People
Our Business
Well established Highbrook ngahere
with the Goodman team having planted 3,500 native plants in 2022.
OUROUR
SUSTAINABILITYSUSTAINABILITY
STRATEGYSTRATEGY
As a long-term property investor, our decision
making is guided by a business strategy that
aims to deliver positive outcomes for all our
stakeholders. It
includes targets for a lower
carbon
and
more resilient portfolio.
Our sustainability strategy is built
upon the following three pillars.
SUSTAINABLE
PROPERTIES
We invest in and develop sustainable properties
that are designed to be adaptable, resource
efficient and resilient, targeting green star
ratings
certifications.
Located close to key transport networks and utility
infrastructure, these facilities help our customers
improve productivity and reduce emissions.
High-quality workspaces and a range of amenity
features
also contribute to the wellbeing of the
people
working in these
businesses.
PEOPLE
AND CULTURE
We believe that a sustainable business, positively
connected with its people and the wider
community, delivers superior long-term results.
CORPORATE
PERFORMANCE
A sustainable investment strategy, strong
governance and commitment
to ESG principles
give our investors, regulators, customers, and
community partners confidence in our business.
SUSTAINABILITY
3130
Financial Results
Goodman NZ
Annual Report 2026
GNZ Bond Issuer Limited
Annual Report 2026
ContentsYear in ReviewOur BusinessSustainabilityClimate-related DisclosuresOther InformationSustainability
The material factors presented in the
materiality matrix remain unchanged
since last surveyed in FY24. These
factors are expected to be re-
evaluated ahead of our FY27 annual
report and will include both internal
and external stakeholder feedback.
The 10 material factors reflect the range of criteria applied
by our customers, investors, suppliers, community partners
and our own people when assessing the success of our
business. Understanding these factors and the relative
importance attributed to each, informs and helps prioritise
our sustainability initiatives.
An internal review of our material factors confirmed the
scope, relevance and relative rankings of the existing
factors
remains appropriate.
The 10 factors are categorised under the three pillars of
our
sustainability strategy and are described below.
SUSTAINABLE PROPERTIES
1 Customer attraction and retention
To attract customers and maximise rental
revenue GNZ’s properties need to be
well-located, sustainable and operationally
efficient. They also need to be well maintained
with ongoing investment in new building
technologies. Superior service supports strong
customer retention levels and helps build long
term relationships with these businesses.
2 Sustainable design
and management
All new industrial developments to be
New Zealand Green Building Council (NZGBC)
Green Star certified, targeting a 5 Green Star
Built or Buildings rating, with the construction
process carefully managed to reduce
embodied carbon, building waste and other
environmental impacts. Adopting an internal
carbon price in the development feasibility for
future projects will provide funding to invest
in new, sustainable building technologies.
3 Flexible, adaptable and
resilient properties
Around 97% of the investment portfolio is
independently assessed as being low risk
from the physical impacts of climate change.
The warehousing and logistics focus makes
GNZ’s properties suitable for a range of
business uses. They are designed to be flexible,
resource efficient and can be easily adapted
to meet specific customer requirements.
4 Emission reduction and energy
efficiency strategies
Our FY30 Scope 3 emissions reduction targets
align with criteria defined by the Science
Based Targets Initiative and limiting global
warming to 1.5°C or less. We are investing in
lower carbon developments and undertaking
resource efficiency and building upgrade
projects to improve the operational and
environmental performance of the portfolio.
CORPORATE PERFORMANCE
5 Sustainable structure, operations,
and results
Disciplined financial management has enabled
sustainable growth. A corporatised and stapled
group structure provides the most effective
framework to support the delivery of our long-
term investment strategy. With an objective
to provide shareholders with a consistent
and stable dividend stream while maintaining
financial flexibility through the property cycle,
we continue to manage the business prudently.
6 ESG reporting and stakeholder
engagement
Engagement with our stakeholders on
environmental, social and governance
matters is a priority. Our corporate
reporting includes detailed information
on all aspects of our business operations,
including Climate-related Disclosures.
We have adopted the GRI framework in our
reporting and benchmark ourselves through
various sustainability rating
services.
7 Responsible and environmentally
sensitive investment
The Board is committed to delivering a
sustainable business strategy, focused on
long term value creation. It includes a risk
management framework that considers non-
financial issues, such as climate change impacts
on new investment initiatives. A Sustainable
Finance Framework supports investment
in
sustainable property solutions for customers.
PEOPLE AND CULTURE
8 Health, safety and wellbeing
The health, safety and wellbeing of our
people, our customers, our contractors
and the wider community is fundamental
to our business. We adhere to strict safety
protocols and encourage a culture of safety
awareness. Health and safety KPI’s are also
a feature of all employees’ remuneration.
High retention levels and engagement scores
confirm we are creating a positive and
supportive work environment for our people.
9 Diversity and inclusiveness
We celebrate individual differences and
have a comprehensive inclusion and
diversity policy that includes strategies to
improve representation over time. We want
a positive culture that is free of harassment,
victimisation and discrimination and have
adopted flexible work practices that
help reduce bias and ensure we are an
inclusive and progressive organisation.
10 Social equity
A contemporary remuneration framework
ensures we continue to attract and retain
the best people. To encourage wider
participation in our industry we provide an
annual scholarship for a University of Auckland
property student. We invest in social initiatives
through Goodman Community and encourage
social procurement in new construction
contracts and supplier
agreements.
HIGH
HIGHEST
Significance of environmental, economic and/or social impact
Influence on assessments and decisions
0
5
Sustainable structure,
operations, and results
Customer attraction
and retention
3
Flexible, adaptable and
resilient properties
2
Sustainable design and management
4
Emission reduction and
energy efficiency strategies
Social equity
7
Responsible and environmentally
sensitive investment
6
ESG reporting and
stakeholder engagement
9
Diversity and inclusiveness
8
Health, safety and wellbeing
FOCUSED ON
WHAT MATTERS
MATERIALITY MATRIX
Water collection
is standard in new
Goodman developments.
3332
Financial Results
Goodman NZ
Annual Report 2026
GNZ Bond Issuer Limited
Annual Report 2026
ContentsYear in ReviewOur BusinessSustainabilityClimate-related DisclosuresOther InformationSustainability
ACC and Dicker Data
M20 Business Park
Active management of our portfolio includes
maintaining our properties to a high standard
and investing in upgrade programmes that
improve the operational and environmental
performance of our buildings.
FOCUS
EMISSIONS
REDUCTION
PAT H WAY
ACTION
+FY30 corporate emissions
target
1
on track with 19.6%
reduction from our FY20
base year
+Completion of core portfolio
HVAC upgrade programme
1
Corporate emissions include Scope 1,
Scope 2 and Scope 3 categories 3-7.
FOCUS
IMPROVING
BIODIVERSITY
ACTION
+44 mature pohutakawa
trees relocated with
24 transplanted within
Waitomokia during
infrastructure works and
20 relocated off site for
Auckland Council and other
projects
+Over 5,500 native specimens
planted at first stage of the
Waitomokia ngahere
+ A
pproximately 700 native
plants planted at the rear
of
Savill Link multi units
FOCUS
ENERGY
EFFICIENCY
FOCUS
GREEN STAR
R AT E D
DEVELOPMENT
ACTION
+Customers continue to
benefit from LED lighting
across core portfolio
+5 o
r 5.5 Star NABERSNZ
ratings achieved for all
eligible office buildings
at Highbrook and M20
Business Park
+10 assets awarded Green
Star Performance during the
period
+S
ubmetering programme
now 71% installed or in
progress
ACTION
+94% of waste diverted from
landfill for Mount Wellington
demolition
+The first project funded by
Goodman NZ’s Embodied
Carbon Innovation Fund
(ECIF) has been completed,
supporting the use of
alternative construction
techniques
FOCUS
RENEWABLE
ENERGY
ACTION
+Renewable electricity
certificates
2
supplied by
Meridian Energy and Mercury
+2
.9 MWp of solar installed
to date
2
Through the purchase of New Zealand
Energy Certificates (NZ-ECs) from
Meridian Energy’s and Mercury
Certified Renewable Energy product,
Goodman is able to utilise a ‘0’
emission factor, reflecting Meridian’s
and Mercury’s renewable electricity
generation.
3534
Financial Results
Goodman NZ
Annual Report 2026
GNZ Bond Issuer Limited
Annual Report 2026
ContentsYear in ReviewOur BusinessSustainabilityClimate-related DisclosuresOther Information
A resource-efficient portfolio that
supports our customers in meeting
their own climate goals is helping
create a sustainable business.
The following highlights summarise
our progress toward our targets.
SUSTAINABLE
PROPERTIES
Enhancing operational efficiency
Our properties can help businesses achieve their own climate
targets and contribute to greater productivity and reduced
operating costs.
Active management of our portfolio includes maintaining
our properties to a high standard and investing in upgrade
programmes that improve the operational and environmental
performance of our buildings.
It’s a strategy that helps attract and retain customers with
these businesses benefitting from lower emissions, more
resource efficient and resilient buildings.
Our sustainability initiatives have included the installation of
electrical submetering, customer and public EV chargers,
LED lighting upgrades, rooftop solar energy systems, and
water saving technologies.
We also completed the replacement of R22 refrigerants
in building HVAC systems with lower GWP alternatives
to reduce the climate impacts of fugitive emissions from
system
failures.
Developing sustainably
Our commitment to sustainable development includes
targeting a minimum 5 Green Star Built or Buildings rating
from the NZGBC for all new projects.
The first stage of the Mt Wellington warehouse development
project, consisting of 21,850 sqm is targeting a 6 Green Star
Built rating.
Corporate emissions
Corporate emissions relate to our general business activities
and include the buildings and spaces within the portfolio
where we have operational control. Toitū net carbonzero
certification confirms that our corporate emissions have
been measured in accordance with the ISO 14064-1:2018
standard and matched with locally sourced carbon credits
(Category 1-4), and certified renewable energy certificates
(Category 2) from Meridian and Mercury.
Scope 3 emissions
Scope 3 emissions make up the majority of our carbon
footprint and are the main focus of our sustainability efforts.
The largest contributors to these are our capital expenditure
programme and in use carbon emissions as a result of our
customers leasing space within the portfolio.
Refer to detailed disclosure of Scope 3 emissions in the Full
Greenhouse Gas Emission inventory included in our climate-
related disclosures on page 58 later in this report.
Sustainability
FOCUS
FINANCIALLY
SUSTAINABLE
ACTION
+Portfolio occupancy
of 96.9%
+Investment grade credit
rating of BBB
+Look through loan to
value ratio of 19.8% and
committed gearing of 24.0%
+Cash distributions for FY26
reflecting a pay-out ratio of
around 85.5%
FOCUS
EXTERNAL
CERTIFICATION
ACTION
+PwC limited assurance of
FY26 GHG emissions
+Toitū net carbonzero
certification for corporate
emissions
+Goodman New Zealand
Limited and Goodman
Property Services (NZ)
Limited adopted the new
Sustainable Finance
Framework
FOCUS
COMMUNITY
SUPPORT
ACTION
+$0.5 million distributed
through Goodman NZ
Community
+D
irect and indirect support
to 15 organisations
FOCUS
GOVERNANCE
AND DISCLOSURE
ACTION
+Streamlined governance
and compliance processes
following the corporatisation
of GMT and the move to
a stapled structure for the
business
+A
lignment with the NZX
Corporate Governance
Code
+Climate-related Disclosures
incorporated into FY26
Annual Report
+G
RI reporting framework
3736
Financial Results
Goodman NZ
Annual Report 2026
GNZ Bond Issuer Limited
Annual Report 2026
ContentsYear in ReviewOur BusinessSustainabilityClimate-related DisclosuresOther Information
We believe that a sustainable operating model is
essential for an organisation to be successful over
the long-term. We have continued to pursue initiatives
that enhance our business, extend our reporting
and provide transparency to our stakeholders.
CORPORATE
PERFORMANCE
Environmental, social and governance (ESG)
Engagement with our stakeholders on environmental, social
and governance matters is a priority for our business.
Effective and transparent governance structures gives
stakeholders confidence in the delivery of our business
strategy. The GRI index on page 172 assists those
focused on
our sustainability performance, with links to
key disclosures.
Our Climate-related Disclosures on page 43 include a
full emissions inventory with assurance provided by PwC.
The disclosures also describe how we govern and manage
climate-related risks and opportunities. They form part of a
wider enterprise risk management framework that includes
climate, compliance, financial, health and safety, operational,
people, regulatory, strategic and other risks.
The corporate governance section on page 140 compares our
current practices against the principles and recommendations
of the NZX Corporate Governance Code. GNZ’s suite
of governance documents has been updated following
corporatisation and stapling and is available online: https://
nz.goodman.com/about-goodman/corporate-governance
Communication and industry participation
Listed on the NZX, we have an obligation to provide the market
with timely, balanced and easily accessible information.
We
engage with our stakeholders on a regular basis, through
a
variety of communication channels, including formal
reporting, market announcements and briefings, and more
directly through, presentations and meetings. We extend our
reach through the use of social media.
We are an active industry participant, supporting initiatives
and organisations aligned with our business.
Our corporate memberships and partnerships include
New
Zealand Shareholders’ Association, Property Council
New Zealand, NZ Green Building Council, Greater East Tāmaki
Business Association, Te Uru Tāngata Centre for Workplace
Inclusion and Australasian Investor Relations Association.
Financially sustainable
To build a long-term business, we need to be financially
sustainable. We achieve this through prudent capital
management and by maintaining high occupancy rates.
The strength of our customers supports our own financial
performance, providing the strong rental cash flows that
underpin earnings and dividend growth.
Low gearing and substantial liquidity add resilience to our
business and the flexibility to invest in new growth and active
investment opportunities when they arise. The establishment
of a property funds management platform provides GNZ with
additional capital management options.
Our Sustainable Finance Framework is a treasury initiative
that enables the business to issue bonds and establish loans
to support the delivery of sustainable property solutions.
GNZ’s investment grade credit rating of BBB/stable has
been
assigned by S&P Global Ratings. GNZ’s senior secured
debt facilities, including its bonds, are rated one notch higher
at BBB+.
Community engagement
Recognising the needs of our stakeholders and actively
engaging with our communities continues to foster positive
relationships.
Our relationship with tangata whenua is one of the most
important of these connections. We celebrate Māori culture
and work alongside local Iwi in our investment and social
initiatives.
Pictured above is the model replica of the mahi toi
(sculpture) designed by artist Tessa Harris, Director
of
Taonga Toi, in collaboration with Ngāi Tai. It is a
tribute to Maungarei, one of the tallest
and most
significant maunga in Tāmaki.
The finished sculpture in the Highbrook Ngahere
will stand nearly
2 metres tall. A second, larger work
located on Highbrook Drive in front of Tawharau Lane
will be
5
metres tall and illuminated.
Zilch has partnered with Goodman NZ to bring
flexible
electric vehicle access to Highbrook Business
Park. The new Zilch Highbrook Hub provides
businesses, customers and the wider community
with an easier way to use zero-emission transport,
without the cost or complexity of vehicle ownership.
It’s a smart, sustainable solution for commuting,
client meetings, site visits or day-to-day travel across
Auckland.
Through Goodman NZ Community we continue
to support programmes that help build inclusive,
resilient, and sustainable communities. You can
read more on Goodman NZ Community on page 40.
Ngāi Tai ki Tāmaki artist Tessa Harris
and Goodman’ Landscape Manager
Shane Everett with the mahi toi model.
Zilch electric hire cars
are located at Highbrook.
Sustainability
FOCUS
INVESTING IN
OUR PEOPLE
ACTION
+390 training hours
completed in FY26
+T
eam events that celebrate
diversity and support
inclusion, wellbeing and
workplace culture
+Long-term incentive plan
which rewards permanent
team members, aligning
their interests with those of
our investors
FOCUS
HEATH AND
SAFETY AT WORK
ACTION
+Workplace wellbeing and
people care programme,
provided by Sonder
+Free flu vaccine and skin
checks for team members
+E
nhanced board reporting
+R
obust overlapping duties
framework in response to
Whakaari Management Ltd
High Court decision
+N
o serious harm injuries
recorded in FY26
FOCUS
SOCIAL
PROCUREMENT
AND SUPPLY
CHAIN ETHICS
ACTION
+Social procurement
encouraged in new
construction contracts and
supplier agreements
+Team members trained to
assess potential risks in
our supply chain in relation
to money laundering and
modern slavery
3938
Financial Results
Goodman NZ
Annual Report 2026
GNZ Bond Issuer Limited
Annual Report 2026
ContentsYear in ReviewOur BusinessSustainabilityClimate-related DisclosuresOther Information
The Goodman team planting
natives at Waitomokia.
By investing in our people, our culture and
in positive community outcomes we are
creating a more sustainable business
that benefits all our stakeholders.
PEOPLE AND
CULTURE
Supporting our people
Our workplaces support the health, safety and wellbeing
of our people while our brand values guide how we interact
with each other, represent our business, and engage with
stakeholders.
An engagement score of 83% and a high employee retention
rate over the last year, reflect a positive and supportive work
environment.
We continue to promote wellbeing through initiatives that
support mental and physical health.
Through initiatives such as Fareshare and Workride, our team
can access benefits that support commuting to and from
work, helping promote wellbeing, reduce costs, and align with
our commitment to sustainability.
The Fareshare benefit is designed to support sustainable
commuting by subsidising public transport costs via bus, train
and ferry travel to and from work. Workride is New
Zealand’s
bike benefit programme providing employees with an easy and
flexible option to support their commute to and from work.
Various sporting, recreational and cultural events are also
supported throughout the year.
Developing our people in an inclusive and
diverse
workplace
Developing our people is a continual focus for our business.
To help our people reach their potential we provide career
pathways. This includes formal induction programmes, regular
reviews, annual development plans and training objectives.
To encourage wider participation in our industry we award an
annual scholarship to a University of Auckland property student,
participate in the University’s property buddy programme and
support the Keystone Trust through Goodman NZ Community.
Highbrook FunRunWalk 2026
The Fareshare benefit encourages
employees to use more public transport.
FOCUS
DIVERSE AND
INCLUSIVE
WORKPLACE
ACTION
+A diverse team of over 70
that includes 13 different
ethnicities, with speakers of
14 languages
+An engagement score
of 83%, reflecting a high
level of connection and
motivation among our
people
+Board and executive
diversity reflect 33.3%
and 37.5% female
representation, respectively
We believe an inclusive and diverse team enhances the way
we think and work, contributing to better business outcomes.
Our Inclusion and Diversity policy sets targets for 2030
across gender, ethnicity and age. These objectives guide
our behaviour and help ensure we are a representative and
inclusive workplace. We value each person’s uniqueness and
want our people to feel supported.
Our flexible and progressive employment policies reduce bias
and promote work life balance. Further information on our
workplace demographics can be found on page 142.
Prioritising health and safety
The Board is fully committed to providing and maintaining
safe work environments for all who work at or visit our sites.
This is achieved by adhering to all health and safety legal
requirements, providing pragmatic and effective systems,
ensuring people have the right skills, and partnering with
our customers, contractors and other key stakeholders to
support safe work practices.
We monitor a range of performance measures which are
presented to the Board on a quarterly basis. During the year,
there were 95 recorded events (incidents and near misses),
compared to 75 in FY25, with no serious harm injuries
recorded. The increase in recorded events reflects our
improved reporting, an area of focus during the year, with the
majority resulting in little to no harm.
We support the protection of human rights and equity and
fairness in our operations and supply chain. Mandatory
modern slavery risk training is completed annually by all
team
members.
We believe an inclusive and
diverse team enhances the way
we think and work, contributing
to better business outcomes.
Sustainability
We aim to help build inclusive, resilient, and sustainable
communities where we operate to provide people
with the opportunity to reach their full potential.
Through dynamic partnerships with community organisations,
we aim to make a sustained and tangible difference that
strengthens communities and enables long-term positive change.
We support community
organisations that are enabling
food and housing security
and providing access to
household goods and clothing.
KiwiHarvest
As New Zealand’s leading food rescue
organisation, KiwiHarvest collects nutritious
but perishable food that would otherwise go to
landfill and redirects it to those in need.
We are extremely proud to be a founding
partner and supporter since 2015 with
KiwiHarvest being our largest community
partnership.
During the year, Goodman NZ Community
funding has enabled KiwiHarvest to deliver over
500,000 meals to those in need. This includes
food banks and other recipient agencies. This is
equivalent to 396,816 kg of food rescued.
Our support also includes the provision of
KiwiHarvest’s warehouse facilities at Highbrook
Business Park where our team take part in
regular volunteering to help process and pack
produce and other food items for distribution.
GOODMAN NZ
COMMUNITY
MEETING
ESSENTIAL
NEEDS
https://www.kiwiharvest.org.nz/
We partner with organisations that offer education
and employment pathways in our communities.
ENABLING
EDUCATION &
EMPLOYMENT
Goodman NZ’s partnership with Duffy Books in Homes
continues to make a meaningful difference for tamariki
with support across four schools.
KiwiHarvest
Highbrook Business Park
We focus on initiatives that improve
psychosocial wellbeing and create space
for people and communities to flourish.
Ongoing support is provided through our Give Back initiative,
discretionary grants and other fundraising, financial support
was also provided to organisations and events which include:
+Daffodil Day – Cancer Society New Zealand
+IDFNZ The Kids Foundation
+Orange Sky
+R
onald McDonald House
+S
pringboard Community Works
+Starship Foundation
We support organisations
equipped to deliver immediate
response and initiate
recovery to natural disasters
and
extreme
events.
During the year, support was made to
organisations equipped to respond quickly
and
to assist communities in early recovery
which include:
+R
apid Relief Team
+Tauranga Land Search and Rescue
PROMOTING
SOCIAL AND
MENTAL WELLBEING
PROVIDING
DISASTER
RELIEF
Duffy Books in Homes
Founded by author Alan Duff,
Duffy Books is a national literacy
programme that promotes reading
through book ownership. Since its
launch in 1995, the programme has
grown to support more than 520
schools and 280 early childhood
centres, distributing over 15
million
books to more than 100,000
students in communities throughout
New
Zealand.
Duffy Books is our longest-running
community partnership, supporting
Fairburn School, Sir Edmund Hillary
Collegiate, Wiri Central Primary and
Ōtāhuhu Primary School.
Keystone Trust
The Keystone Trust is focused on
promoting opportunities and lifting
the
participation of young people in
the New
Zealand property industry.
Since 1994, the trust has granted
over 376 scholarships and awarded
$3.3 million in scholarship funding
to help young people held back by
inequality to take up tertiary studies in
the property and construction sector.
The scholarship recipients also
receive broader support including
mentoring, networking opportunities,
site visits and paid work experience.
For the 2026 intake, there were
38
scholarships awarded (the largest
intake in its 22-year history), lifting
the total number of students on the
programme to 74.
Tania Dalton Foundation
The Tania Dalton Foundation (TDF) is
helping the next generation of female
athletes thrive. With an aim to award
up to 14 scholarships each year,
the TDF Scholarship
Programme
provides support, mentorship, and
creates long-term opportunity, helping
girls from all backgrounds reach their
full potential. They believe in equity,
inclusion and the value
of backing
someone who may not otherwise get
the chance.
We have proudly supported the TDF
programme since 2018, with Trinity
Waiwiri
-Toka our current scholarship
recipient. Trinity is a talented softball
player from Rosehill College who
has represented New
Zealand
internationally and is now in her final
year of the three-year programme.
www.booksinhomes.org.nz
www.keystonetrust.org.nz
www.taniadaltonfoundation.org.nz
4140
Financial Results
Goodman NZ
Annual Report 2026
GNZ Bond Issuer Limited
Annual Report 2026
ContentsYear in ReviewOur BusinessSustainabilityClimate-related DisclosuresOther InformationSustainability
These climate statements are voluntary
statements for the year ending
31
March 2026 for the GNZ group.
The Financial Markets Conduct
Amendment Bill proposes reforms that
would remove managed investment
scheme (MIS) managers from
mandatory climate reporting, and raise
the listed issuer thresholds (to $1bn
for
equity and debt).
While the Bill is still progressing, the
Financial Markets Authority has
announced a “no action” approach
for affected entities that expect their
climate reporting obligations to cease
once the legislative changes are
enacted.
The Bill, as proposed, will have the
following effects:
+
GPS would cease to be a CRE in
respect of the GMT once the Bill is
enacted, because the Bill proposes
to remove MIS managers from the
regime.
+
G
MB would cease to be a CRE
once the Bill is enacted, because
the listed debt issuer threshold is
proposed to increase to $1bn and
GMB is below that threshold.
GNZL is a newly incorporated entity and,
on that basis, will not meet the definition
of a CRE in (at least) its first or second
accounting periods. Both GPS and GMB
are relying on the FMA’s “no action” relief
and are not preparing mandatory climate
statements for the financial year ending
31 March 2026.
Recognising that our stakeholders are
interested in our approach to climate
change, we have prepared voluntary
climate statements for the year ending
31 March 2026 in respect of the GNZ
group on a consolidated basis. These
voluntary climate statements have
been prepared by reference to the
GNZ group following completion of the
corporatisation and stapling transaction
described on page 149.
This is to ensure that investors in the
GNZ group are receiving information
that is most relevant to their investments
going forward, and to support
consistency with any mandatory
reporting that may be required in
future
years.
These voluntary climate statements
have been prepared by reference to the
disclosures required by the Aotearoa
New Zealand Climate Standards (NZ CS)
issued by the External Reporting Board.
These voluntary climate statements
are not required to comply, and are not
represented as complying, with the
NZ
CS.
In preparing this report, Goodman
NZ has elected not to disclose its
assessment of the anticipated financial
impacts of the physical and transition
impacts of the climate-related risks
and opportunities it has identified. In
the context of mandatory disclosures,
excluding this information is permitted by
adoption provision 2 in an entity’s first to
fourth reporting periods.
Forward looking statements
These disclosures summarise
Goodman NZ’s assessment of future
climate
-r
elated risks and opportunities
and how these are integrated into our
broader business strategy. They include
forward-l
ooking statements relating to
climate-related goals, targets, pathways,
ambitions, risks and opportunities, and
current transition plans.
These statements are based on
assumptions that involve inherent
risks and uncertainties, many of
which are beyond our control. As a
result, actual outcomes may differ
from our predictions or expectations,
assumptions may prove incorrect, and
our objectives, targets and strategies to
mitigate and adapt to climate-r
elated
risks and opportunities may not be
achieved.
The basis and limitations of our
analysis are outlined, and we reserve
the right to revisit assumptions as our
understanding evolves.
CLIMATE-RELATED
Viridian
Highbrook Business Park
DISCLOSURES
4342
Financial Results
Goodman NZ
Annual Report 2026
GNZ Bond Issuer Limited
Annual Report 2026
ContentsYear in ReviewOur BusinessSustainabilityClimate-related DisclosuresOther InformationClimate-related Disclosures
GHG EMISSIONS SNAPSHOT (tCO
2
e) FY26F Y25F Y24
Corporate emissions (location based)8 9 7. 6 729.66 3 8 .7
S
cope 3 emissions – variable investment impacts1 , 476 .723,831.026,436.8
Scope 3 emissions – other20,040.217,272.3 14,313.2
Total emissions (location based)22,414.5 41,832.9 41 ,3 8 8 .7
Emissions from variable investments include the impact of developed and sold assets. These emissions will therefore
fluctuate year on year depending on the timing of these activities.
To make underlying trends clearer, emissions are reported including and excluding variable investment impacts.
CLIMATE-RELATED RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES SUMMARY
OpportunitiesStrategyRisks
Extreme WeatherNot materialAsset selection
and adaptation
Flooding and increased
temperatures
Customer PreferencesCollaborate to reduce
customer carbon
Energy efficient upgradesProperties may not meet
sustainability targets
Stranded AssetsPurchase and redevelop
stranded properties
Adapt at risk assetsPolicy changes affect
leasability
Cost of InsuranceLower insurance costAdapt at risk assetsInsurer scrutiny increases
Cost of CapitalImprove investment case
in
GNZ
Implement sustainability
strategy
ESG expectations not met
EnergyProvide resilient, efficient
properties
Solar upgrade programmeNot material
Cost of DevelopmentNot materialSupplier engagementSlow decarbonisation of
construction sector
Reporting boundaries
The scope of our reporting includes Goodman New Zealand
Limited (GNZL) and Goodman Property Services (NZ)
Limited (GPS), (together, Goodman NZ), and subsidiaries of
GNZL and GPS. Their subsidiaries include GNZ Bond Issuer
Limited and all other property owning and management
related entities. The boundary also includes HLP, the limited
partnership that owns Highbrook Business Park. For the
purposes of this report, we either refer to these entities
specifically or collectively as Goodman NZ or GNZ.
Governance and risk management
Climate considerations are embedded in Goodman NZ’s
strategic and investment decision
-ma
king. The Board has
ultimate responsibility for climate strategy, and adopted the
current three-year strategic plan and transition plan. Climate
performance towards targets is reviewed quarterly, and
climate impacts are assessed as part of all new investment
and development approvals. Executive management is
responsible for delivering the climate strategy, supported
by
a
dedicated sustainability team.
Climate-related risks are managed through the enterprise
risk management framework and assessed across short,
medium and long-t
erm horizons.
Science-aligned targets
In 2025, the Board approved science
-aligned emissions
reduction targets, covering approximately 80% of our FY25
base year emissions.
All targets are to be achieved by FY30, from a FY25 base
year, and include:
+30.4% reduction in developments’ embodied carbon
intensity
+26.9% reduction in leased warehousing in-use emissions
intensity, applying a location-based approach
+3
7.6% reduction in leased whole portfolio in-use
emissions intensity, applying a market-based approach
Transition plan
On pages 54-55, the transition plan outlines GNZ’s strategy
for achieving a climate-r
esilient future, including new pathways
that detail how we aim to meet our embodied
-c
arbon and
in-use emissions targets. This includes forecast reductions
in embodied carbon intensity as we work with suppliers of
building materials. It also reflects the expected impact on
in-use emissions from lighting upgrades, submetering and
solar along with emission factor changes from the ongoing
decarbonisation of the electricity grid.
Capital deployment associated with this transition totalled
$16.8m in FY26.
Assurance and sign off
The Board has overseen the preparation of this year’s Annual
Report and the Climate-related Disclosures it contains. PwC
have provided limited assurance over the emissions inventory
as described on pages 75-77.
The full Board have reviewed the completed Annual Report,
including the Climate-related Disclosures, and approved
these for release on 25 June 2026.
Absolute emissions
Total emissions decreased 46% from FY25 to FY26,
primarily due to no developments completing in FY26.
Developments accounted for 57% of emissions in
FY25.
Beyond developments, the sale of Bush Road in May 2025
accounted for 5.7% of total emissions (1,279 tCO
2
e),
capturing emissions from the asset’s ongoing use, as well as
end-of-life impacts. Demolition waste from the Mt Wellington
redevelopment contributed a further 0.9% (197.2 tCO
2
e).
Excluding these variable investment activities, total emissions
increased by 16% from FY25 to FY26, primarily due to higher
capex spend across the stabilised portfolio.
Emissions intensity
Emissions intensity is calculated based on portfolio NLA
(sqm) and net property income ($pa). Reporting emissions
intensity helps normalise for changes in portfolio size and
earnings, making year
-on-year trends more comparable.
Total emissions intensity reduced by 45% (NLA) and 43%
(rental income) from FY25 to FY26. Excluding variable
investment activity, intensity increased by 20% (NLA) and
23% (rental income).
In-use emissions intensity decreased by 17% for warehousing
(location-based) and 15% across the total portfolio (market-
based), supporting progress towards our FY30 in-use
emissions intensity reduction targets.
John Dakin Laurissa Cooney
Chair Chair, Audit and Risk Committee
Our climate-related risks and opportunities
In FY24, a detailed assessment process was undertaken
to identify our climate-related risks and opportunities. This
involved scenario analysis across three climate futures:
Orderly, Disorderly, and Hot House World.
From this, we identified six risks and five opportunities, across
seven climate-related impacts as material to GNZ’s long-term
success. These are summarised in the table below. Of the
eleven identified risks and opportunities, ten are transition-
related, with the remaining physical risk detailed separately
below. Management assessed the FY26 impacts of these
items and considered there to be no material financial impact.
A comprehensive review of our climate-related risks and
opportunities will be undertaken in FY27 as part of our
regular review cycle.
Physical risks – extreme weather
Independent specialists have assessed the financial impact
of physical risks from extreme weather events across our
portfolio as low.
By rental income, 97% of the portfolio is classified as low risk,
with 2.3% having moderate fluvial risk and 0.7% high pluvial
risk. The pluvial risk relates to a property earmarked for
redevelopment in the short to medium term. Redevelopment
is expected to mitigate the impact of future pluvial flooding at
this property.
CLIMATE-RELATED
DISCLOSURES
AT A GLANCE
4544
Financial Results
Goodman NZ
Annual Report 2026
GNZ Bond Issuer Limited
Annual Report 2026
ContentsYear in ReviewOur BusinessSustainabilityClimate-related DisclosuresOther InformationClimate-related Disclosures
Sustainability is a permanent agenda
item at each quarterly Board meeting,
where Directors review progress
towards established targets and
approve new climate-related initiatives.
Long-term
2050+
A future time horizon
that represents the
economic lifespan
of GNZ’s industrial
portfolio.
Identifying, assessing, and managing climate-related risks
Goodman NZ has adopted a risk management framework
that considers climate, compliance, financial, health and
safety, operational, people, regulatory, strategic and other
risks. Established processes govern the identification,
assessment and management of these enterprise risks.
In line with Aotearoa New
Zealand Climate Standards,
climate-related risks are evaluated under three climate
scenarios and time horizons. The process to establish
the
detailed climate-related risks and opportunities disclosed
on pages 52-53 was fully described on page 28 of the 2024
Sustainability Report at gmtcrd24.co.nz.
Our adopted climate scenarios will be reviewed periodically, to
reflect changes in
underlying climate models. There were no
material changes to the underlying climate scenarios in FY26.
The climate-r
elated risks identified in FY24 are
comprehensively reassessed on a three
-year cycle, with the
next review scheduled for FY27. The full assessment can
be found on page 31 of the 2024 Sustainability Report at
gmtcrd24.co.nz. Between reviews, management and the
Board assess annually whether any material changes have
occurred. No material changes were identified in FY26.
The assessment encompasses
both
physical and transition risks.
Aon Global Risk Consultants
conducted the physical risk
assessment, which included
a comprehensive review of
the entire value chain, from
upstream development
to internal
operations and
downstream customer activities.
Integrating climate-related risks into risk management
A detailed risk register, maintained by management, forms
the foundation of the business’s risk management framework.
Quarterly reviews and a comprehensive annual risk
assessment process evaluate changes to the business
or operating environment, assessing existing risks and
identifying new ones.
These assessments include consideration of the impact
and likelihood of each material risk, with priority reflecting
the severity of potential impacts, together with the agreed
mitigation approach. The outcome of the annual risk
assessment process is presented to the Board for approval.
Environmental sustainability and climate change are among
the areas of significant risk previously identified. Business
planning incorporates strategies to manage and mitigate these
risks, such as setting carbon reduction targets and achieving a
minimum 5
Green Star certification for new developments.
Climate impacts on new investments are assessed during
due diligence, with the Board considering these factors when
approving new property acquisitions or development initiatives.
RISK MANAGEMENT MATRIX
Shor t-term
Present – 2030
Reflecting the average
lease term within
the portfolio, and detailed
business budgeting
timeframes.
Medium-term
2030 – 2050
Consistent with
longer-term business
planning, capital
expenditure projects and
re-development plans.
GOVERNANCE HIERARCHY
Board of
Directors
Audit and Risk
Committee
Executive
Management
Team
Head of
Environmental
Sustainability
GOVERNANCE
Board oversight
The Boards of Goodman New Zealand Limited and Goodman
Property Services (NZ) Limited govern the business
operations and strategic direction of GNZ. This oversight
includes ensuring that all commercial activities are aligned
with the sustainability objectives and
climate-related targets
contained in its three-year strategic plan.
The Board considered and adopted the current three-year
strategic plan in March 2026. This process included a review
of the business’s transition plan and previously identified
climate-related risks and opportunities. The transition
plan presented on pages 54-55 summarises the strategic
response to these risks and opportunities, and the FY30
emission reduction targets.
Sustainability is a permanent agenda item at each quarterly
Board meeting, where Directors review progress towards
established targets and approve new climate-related
initiatives. Climate risk assessments are also a requirement of
new investment approvals.
Our Directors have a complementary set of skills, with
sustainability one of the core competencies represented on
the Board. Specialist external advice and ongoing training
help ensure Directors are well-informed on developments in
climate science and climate
governance.
Board composition changed during the year, with Keith
Smith’s retirement and Steve Jurkovich’s appointment. An
internal skills matrix, developed in FY24, maps competencies
across the Board, including climate and sustainability
expertise. The Nomination Committee references this matrix
when evaluating Board composition and recruiting new
directors, ensuring the Board maintains appropriate skills and
competencies to provide oversight of climate-related risks
and opportunities.
The role of Management
The executive management group, led by the Chief Executive
Officer, is responsible for delivering a business strategy that
includes the goal of becoming a sustainable, resilient, and low-
carbon real estate provider.
The Chief Financial Officer, as Head of Sustainability,
oversees the sustainability programme, including climate
reporting and initiatives to enhance environmental
performance and resilience, primarily by reducing upfront
embodied carbon emissions and in-use carbon emissions.
The Head of Environmental Sustainability, one of four
dedicated sustainability roles, reports directly to the
Head
of Sustainability.
RISK MANAGEMENT
4746
Financial Results
Goodman NZ
Annual Report 2026
GNZ Bond Issuer Limited
Annual Report 2026
ContentsYear in ReviewOur BusinessSustainabilityClimate-related DisclosuresOther Information
The Viridis ecology team measuring and
benchmarking biodiversity at Waitomokia.
Climate-related Disclosures
STRATEGY
This section describes the climate
scenario analysis undertaken by
Goodman NZ, the key climate-related risks
and opportunities including anticipated
business impacts and how this has
influenced Goodman NZ’s transition plan
for a low-emissions, climate-resilient future.
Goodman NZ’s business strategy is focused on the delivery of
sustainable property solutions for its customers. Exclusively
investing in the Auckland industrial market, our warehouse and
logistics facilities provide these businesses with well-located
and operationally efficient facilities that provide critical supply
chain infrastructure for the New
Zealand economy.
Goodman NZ has been monitoring and disclosing its
corporate emissions since 2006. These disclosures
have been extended over the last three years to include a
comprehensive assessment of all Scope 3 emissions.
The potential impacts of climate change are far-reaching, with
current behaviours and actions expected to have significant
consequences on the future operating environment. The
three climate scenarios that have been adopted reflect a
range of outcomes, aiding in the understanding of specific
risks and opportunities the business may encounter over
short, medium, and long-term time horizons.
The business’s current strategic plan incorporates the
objectives of the transition plan presented on pages 54-55.
These
objectives focus on mitigating climate change impacts,
including reducing the intensity of upfront embodied carbon and
in-use carbon emissions, and adapting the business to support
the climate goals of its
customers.
In 2025, Scope 3 emissions reduction targets were set for
FY30. Toitū Envirocare have independently verified that
these short-term targets align with SBTi’s criteria for limiting
global warming to no more than 1.5°C.
Selecting climate scenarios
The three climate scenarios established by the NZGBC for the
Construction and Property Sector were adopted in 2024. While
there have been no revisions to these scenarios over the past
12 months, they continue to represent the most appropriate
framework for New Zealand-based real estate investment
entities such as Goodman NZ. We acknowledge that climate
science is evolving and remain alert to new developments that
may shape future scenarios.
The current scenarios are fully described in the NZGBC
Climate Scenarios for the Construction and Property Sector.
Please review the full report to understand the assumptions
and limitations underpinning these scenarios. https://nzgbc.
org.nz/research-and-reports
CLIMATE SCENARIO SUMMARIES
SCENARIO 1
ORDERLY
NGFS
1
: ‘Net Zero 2050’
Policy reaction: Immediate/Smooth
Policy ambition: 1.5°C
Technology and
behaviour
change:
Fa
st
Physical risk severity:
M
oderate
Average sea levels:
+0
.39m
Mean temperature:
+1
.4° C
Rainfall intensity:
+6%
N
umber of hot days:
+
40%
SCENARIO 2
DISORDERLY
NGFS: ‘Delayed Transition’
Policy reaction: Delayed
Policy ambition: <2.0°C
Technology and
behaviour change:
S
low/Fast
P
hysical risk severity:
M
oderate
Average sea levels:
+
0.60m
Mean temperature:
+1
.8 ° C
Rainfall intensity:
+6%
N
umber of hot days:
+
40%
SCENARIO 3
HOT HOUSE WORLD
NGFS: ‘Current Policies’
Policy reaction: None
Policy ambition: >3.0°C
Technology and
behaviour change:
S
low
P
hysical risk severity:
E
xtreme
Average sea levels:
+1
.0 8 m
Mean temperature:
+
3.6°C
Rainfall intensity:
+
2 6 . 1%
Number of hot days:
+
300%
Timely policy change prompts
organisations to quickly adopt
carbon reduction strategies.
In the short to medium-term the shadow cost
of carbon rises, driving demand for low carbon
building materials. These materials are in short
supply. Building costs rise.
Behavioural change and energy caps see
demand for more energy efficient buildings.
A
shortage of energy efficient space drives
demand for assets with on-site electricity
generation and low carbon technologies, like
those found in Green Star rated properties.
The scale of retrofit activities is significant
with building upgrades for energy efficiency
supporting occupier emissions reduction targets
in the short-term. Technology changes quickly
and lower carbon materials become more cost
and time effective in the medium-term.
The grid becomes fully renewable in the
medium-term and buildings become more
energy efficient as occupiers and property
owners play their part in achieving a Net Zero
2050 outcome.
Policy, technology and behaviour
change is slow up until 2030.
Around 2030 there are a series of abrupt
and stringent decarbonisation policies.
The
electricity sector is unprepared for the
rapid demand for electrification. Assets with
on-site generation surge in demand while
New
Zealand experiences frequent blackouts
and electricity price fluctuations in the
medium-term.
The rapid increase in demand for lower
carbon materials sees significant disruption
for the sector with competition for materials
and expertise leading to
significant price
escalations.
Early movers get the opportunity to access
these materials and subject matter experts
before others in the sector.
No policies are introduced to
curb emissions. Regulatory
change is slow with a
focus on adaptation and
managing climate driven
immigration/refugees.
There is limited innovation around lower carbon
materials and technologies due to low demand.
Building codes become more stringent as they
look to address the physical impacts of climate
change with more frequent storm events,
heatwaves, floods and heavier rainfall. Assets
that are unable to meet the new codes risk
becoming stranded.
Mandates are introduced to conserve energy for
critical functions as infrastructure is damaged
by climate change. Demand for buildings
resilient to direct climate-related physical events
and electrical network failures increases.
A breakdown in social cohesion occurs with
heat stress, mental health impacts and food
insecurity from climate change prompting a
retreat from Auckland and other cities.
4948
Financial Results
Goodman NZ
Annual Report 2026
GNZ Bond Issuer Limited
Annual Report 2026
ContentsYear in ReviewOur BusinessSustainabilityClimate-related DisclosuresOther InformationClimate-related Disclosures
1
The Network for Greening the Financial System
Electrical Submetering
Goodman Energy Management (GEM) system allows customers to measure,
monitor and manage usage, to minimise power and report energy spikes.
5150
Financial Results
Goodman NZ
Annual Report 2026
GNZ Bond Issuer Limited
Annual Report 2026
ContentsYear in ReviewOur BusinessSustainabilityClimate-related DisclosuresOther InformationClimate-related Disclosures
CLIMATE-RELATED RISKS
AND OPPORTUNITIES
Following a comprehensive assessment process, we have
identified six risks and five opportunities across seven
climate-related impacts as material to GNZ’s long-term
success. These were first reported in our 2024 Climate-
related Disclosures, with full details of the assessment
process set out
on page 28 of the 2024 Sustainability
Report at gmtcrd24.co.nz.
These risks and opportunities are comprehensively reassessed
on a three-year cycle, with the next review scheduled for FY27.
The following table presents the expected impact areas against
the corresponding risks and opportunities.
Current year Financial Impact
In FY26, the Board assessed these climate-related impacts
to be unchanged as part of strategic planning, a finding
independently confirmed by Aon Global Risk Consultants,
who identified no material change to the portfolio’s physical
risks. Management also assessed the FY26 impacts for each
of these climate-related risks and opportunities and found no
material financial impact.
Further detail on how these climate
-related impacts relate to
our environmental sustainability objectives is provided in the
2024 Sustainability Report at gmtcrd24.co.nz.
OpportunitiesImpactStrategyRisksImpact
PHYSICAL
Extreme
Weather
Not materialAsset selection
and adaptation
Pluvial flooding
and increasing
temperatures
Capex
TRANSITION
Customer
Preferences
Collaborating with
customers to reduce
their operational
carbon
Opex
Rental
income
Energy efficiency
upgrade programme
Properties not
suited to customers’
sustainability targets
Rental
income
TRANSITION
Stranded
Assets
Purchasing and
redeveloping stranded
properties
Revenue
from new
assets
Adapt at risk assetsPolicy change affects
leasability of non-
compliant properties
Capex
TRANSITION
Cost of
Insurance
Lower insurance cost
for assets with lower
physical risks
Opex
Rental
income
Adapt at risk assetsInsurers apply
more scrutiny
following climate-
related losses
Insurance
premiums
TRANSITION
Cost of
Capital
Increase investment
case in GNZ
Funding
costs
Develop and implement
sustainability strategy
Failure to meet ESG
expectations and
climate standards
Funding
costs
TRANSITION
Energy Provide energy efficient
and grid resilient
properties
Leasability
Rental
income
Solar upgrade
programme
Not material
TRANSITION
Cost of
Development
Not materialSupplier engagementConstruction sector
slow to decarbonise /
supply chain disruption
Cost of
carbon,
material
and labour
Climate-related risks and opportunities (continued)
OpportunitiesStrategyRisks
Cost of
Insurance
Transition – Market
Hothouse (Long-term).
All lower-risk properties.
As insurance premiums increasingly
reflect physical risk exposure, a
multi-tiered market is likely to emerge.
Lower-risk assets will benefit from
reduced insurance costs, translating
to lower operating expenses for
customers and stronger rental
growth
potential.
+ Assess and address both physical
and transition risks in new
investments.
+
Enhance existing assets and
development specifications to
improve resilience against the
growing frequency and severity
of extreme weather events.
Transition – Market
Hothouse (Long-term).
All properties.
The growing frequency and intensity
of extreme weather events linked
to climate change are expected to
significantly impact the insurance and
reinsurance sectors. This may drive up
premiums across the board, even for
low-risk assets, while high-risk assets
could face steep premium hikes or
difficulty securing coverage.
Cost of
Capital
Transition – Market
Disorderly (Short-term).
Hothouse (Short/Medium/Long-term).
Whole portfolio.
Form a robust sustainability strategy
that positions our business for a low-
emissions, climate-resilient future,
aligned with investor direction. Meeting
investor demand for these assets can
attract more capital, potentially at a
lower cost.
+
Leverage our Sustainable Finance
Framework to fund sustainable
property initiatives.
+
Develop energy-efficient,
high-quality workplaces targeting
Green
Star certification.
+ Incorporate site-specific nature
and biodiversity targets into
project
planning.
Transition – Reputation
Orderly (Short/Medium/Long-term).
Disorderly (Medium/Long-term).
Whole portfolio.
ESG performance is increasingly
integral to investor decision-making,
influencing WACC and target price.
As
energy and carbon regulations
tighten, failure to keep pace may
directly impact GNZ’s access to
competitively priced funding.
Energy
Transition
– Resilience/Energy Source
Orderly (Short-term).
Disorderly (Medium-term).
Hothouse (Long-term).
Core Portfolio & developments.
Blackouts caused by aging energy
infrastructure will drive demand
for energy-efficient, grid-resilient
properties. Assets with onsite
renewable energy will experience fewer
disruptions, boosting leasing demand
and rental growth.
+
Create energy-efficient,
Green Star-certified workplaces.
+
T
ailor solar installations to meet
customer energy needs.
+
P
repare assets for electrification,
including EV charging
infrastructure.
While there are energy-related risks to
our customers’ operations, we do not
consider these to be a material risk
to
GNZ.
Cost of
Development
We do not consider opportunities
relating to development costs to be
material to GNZ.
+ Collaborate with the construction
sector to identify, test, and adopt
lower-carbon alternatives to
traditional building materials
through GNZ’s Embodied Carbon
Innovation Fund.
+
Prioritise brownfield opportunities
by conserving, reusing, and
recycling materials, and exploring
circular economy solutions in
Value Add properties before
deconstruction.
+
Invest in resource-flexible buildings
designed for easy repurposing at
the end of their economic life.
Transition – Market
Orderly (Short/Medium-term).
Disorderly (Medium-term).
Developments.
The construction sector faces
challenges in rapidly decarbonising.
As
climate-resilient materials and
designs emerge to meet stricter
regulations, limited supply will drive up
material and labour costs.
5352
Financial Results
Goodman NZ
Annual Report 2026
GNZ Bond Issuer Limited
Annual Report 2026
ContentsYear in ReviewOur BusinessSustainabilityClimate-related DisclosuresOther InformationClimate-related Disclosures
OpportunitiesStrategyRisks
Extreme
Weather
We do not consider opportunities
arising from more extreme weather
to be material to GNZ.
+ Enhance asset resilience through
adaptation, landscaping practices
and updated development
specifications.
+
Plan redevelopment for high-risk
buildings.
+ Focus on expanding resilient
locations through intensified
development.
+
Assess and mitigate physical
risks in new investments
while implementing proactive
maintenance plans and supporting
infrastructure to prevent future
damage.
+
Monitor planning and infrastructure
changes across regions of interest.
Physical Risk – Acute/Chronic
Hothouse (Long-term).
Few susceptible assets.
New
Zealand’s climate is evolving,
with more extreme weather patterns
expected, including hotter days, fewer
frost days, and more intense rainfall.
Coastal areas will face rising sea
levels, heightening the risk of flooding
and storm damage. As these climate
challenges intensify, GNZ’s assets in
vulnerable locations will be increasingly
exposed to operational disruptions and
physical damage requiring more capital
expenditure.
Customer
Preferences
Transition – Market
Disorderly (Short-term).
Hothouse (Short & Medium-term).
Core Portfolio & development.
Seven of GNZ’s ten largest customers
have public carbon reduction targets,
with more expected to follow. As supply
of sustainable properties continues to
lag, leading occupiers are expected
to favour energy-efficient, climate-
resilient properties. Investing in these
assets supports customers in meeting
their carbon goals and underpins
stronger rental growth.
+
Partner with customers to reduce
emissions using submetering data.
+
Deliver energy-efficient, Green
Star-certified or equivalent spaces
and introduce green leases.
+
Support customer demand for on-
site solar.
+
Future-proof assets with
EV infrastructure.
Transition – Market
Orderly (Short-term).
Disorderly (Medium-term).
Whole portfolio.
Shifting consumption and global
trade patterns may also reduce
logistics demand. These factors risk
suppressing rental growth.
Stranded
Assets
Transition – Market/Resilience
Hothouse (Long-term).
Value Add assets.
An increasing mismatch between
outdated building stock and evolving
occupier needs is emerging. This
dynamic may drive rent repricing
and open opportunities for GNZ to
reposition, acquire, and redevelop
assets – unlocking new revenue and
strengthening the portfolio.
+
Enhance development and
maintenance strategies to
withstand extreme weather and
safeguard assets from physical
climate risks.
+
E
mbed both physical and
transitional consideration into all
investment decisions.
+
Design and invest in resource-
flexible buildings that support
adaptive reuse at the end of their
economic life.
+
P
repare assets for electrification,
including scalable EV infrastructure.
+
R
educe reliance on external utilities
through efficient systems.
Transition – Market/Regulatory
Hothouse (Long-term).
All properties.
Climate change may render some
buildings obsolete or too expensive to
upgrade. Not adapting our base build
and building upgrade works to meet
sustainability and resilience standards,
could greatly reduce demand and lead
to stranded assets.
Where considered material, the table below shows the risk or opportunity
type (e.g. Transition – Market), the impacted scenario and timeframe
(e.g. Orderly, Short term), the scope of the impact (e.g. Whole portfolio)
and the primary impact assessment. The table also shows the strategy
we have adopted to realise these opportunities and mitigate these risks.
TRANSITION PLAN
Goodman NZ’s first emissions reduction plan in FY21 set out
a clear pathway for lowering corporate emissions with targets
aligned with the objectives of the Paris Agreement. Our
targets now include the reduction of corporate emissions by
43% from 2020 to 2030 and the science-aligned reduction
of our most significant Scope 3 emissions.
In 2025, the Board set new Scope 3 emission reduction
targets, covering around 80% of GNZ’s base year greenhouse
gas inventory. These relate to embodied carbon within
developments and the operational emissions from buildings
within the portfolio.
This climate transition plan summarises our strategic response
to the preceding climate risks. The overarching strategy,
targets and execution included in the plan are grouped into
four categories below: Corporate Activity, Building Materials,
Customer Footprints, Climate Resilience.
The plan also includes the steps we are taking to transition to
a lower carbon economy.
Corporate ActivityBuilding MaterialsCustomer FootprintsClimate Resilience
AimReduce emissions within
Goodman NZ’s direct control.
Use materials and
construction techniques
focused on reducing
upfront embodied carbon.
Support the reduction of
customers’ carbon and other
footprints.
Decarbonise, adapt
assets, and mitigate
risks to be resilient to the
impacts of climate change.
Significance4% of total FY26 emissions.
The most significant corporate
emission sources have
been diesel, electricity, staff
commuting and refrigerant loss,
accounting for over 80%.
Embodied carbon from our
developments accounted
for 57% of total emissions
in FY25. None in FY26.
Our customers’ operational
energy use accounted for
48% of total FY26 emissions
on a location-based
approach.
3% of GNZ’s assets
by rental income have
been assessed to be at
risk to moderate or high
potential for damage from
extreme weather events.
StrategyReduce fugitive emissions by
renewing older HVAC systems.
Reduce the use of fossil fuels
through renewable energy
and promoting low emission
company transport.
Measure embodied carbon
for all developments.
Specify lower GWP
materials and minimise
waste to landfill.
Measure in-use emissions.
Create energy efficient
workplaces with more
advanced lighting, electrical
submetering and on-site
solar.
Invest in low risk locations.
Mitigate and adapt
climate risks.
Adapt at risk assets.
Ta r g e t sReduce corporate emissions
by 43% by FY30 from a base
year of FY20.
Reduce upfront embodied
emissions intensity by 30%
by FY30 from a base year
of F Y25.
Reduce in-use emissions
intensity by 38% by FY30
using a market-based
approach.
Reduce warehouse in-use
emissions intensity by 27%
by 2030 using a location-
based approach.
Minimise number of at risk
assets.
ExecutionRefrigerant replacement
programme now complete.
Electrification of vehicle fleet
and employee incentive scheme
has resulted in 40% of
staff
driving electric vehicles.
Support for AT Fareshare and
Workride schemes from FY26.
GWP targets included in
build specification.
94% of demolition waste
from the Mt Wellington
development was diverted
from landfill.
Energy benchmarking for
core assets.
Collaborate with customers
to understand and reduce
footprint.
Upgrade or redevelop
buildings to improve energy
efficiency.
Complete physical
climate risk assessments
on each new investment.
Adapt or redevelop
assets that are at risk.
Capital
deployment
We have spent $4.9m in
FY23-26 replacing older
refrigerant systems with
lower
GWP refrigerant.
Rebates totalling $360,000
issued to staff through the EV
incentive scheme.
Carbon allocations from
developments to ECIF
totalled $0.9m in FY26.
A five year $27+
million
building upgrade programme
to retrofit our Core Portfolio.
Investment in Green Star
development programme of
$422m since 2021.
Budgeting for risk
assessments on
acquisitions.
Redevelop brownfield
sites that are at risk.
ChallengesLower GWP HVAC systems
still produce fugitive emissions.
The
technology to eliminate
fugitive emissions is still in its
early stages.
Heavily reliant on the
advancement, availability
and lower cost of supply
chain technologies,
specifically around
concrete and steel.
Occupier operations are
outside of our control. Will
rely on collaborating with
customers around the use of
smart building features.
Adaptation reliant
on the
viability of
redevelopment of at
risk
sites.
The charts below show the pathways to transitioning
to lower carbon operations and achieving our
science-aligned carbon reduction targets.
We have published policies for these sustainability objectives at https://nz.goodman.com/about-goodman/corporate-governance
Embodied emissions (developments)
Goodman NZ has engaged with Beca and key
materials suppliers to establish a plausible
reduction pathway for the most significant
contributors to Goodman NZ’s embodied
carbon. Over the next four years, procurement
will focus on lower GWP materials that align with
our 2030
target.
Supplier engagement has been positive with
support for the GWP targets for each element.
The first project funded by Goodman NZ’s
Embodied Carbon Innovation Fund (ECIF) has
resulted in design efficiencies that have been
implemented in new development projects.
In-use emissions (stabilised portfolio)
Goodman NZ targets a minimum 5 Green Star
rating for all new developments, which are on
average 41% more energy efficient than existing
warehouses. As the Green Star development
programme progresses, these buildings will
make up a greater share of the portfolio, and
overall emissions intensity will fall.
Lighting across the Core Portfolio is now 98%
LED following a rolling upgrade programme,
with over 339,000 sqm of space upgraded
over the last 3 years. Customer demand is
expected to drive an increase to the 2.9 MWp
of solar already installed. Submetering installed
or in progress across 71% of the Core Portfolio
enables customers to identify and address
energy inefficiencies.
As the grid transitions to more renewable
generation, the electricity emission factor is
expected to decrease, further reducing
emissions
associated with customer electricity use.
Around 70% of Goodman NZ’s largest
customers have public carbon reduction targets
and many already purchase New
Zealand Energy
Certificates (NZ-ECs). Under a market-based
approach, NZ-ECs allow electricity usage to be
reported with a zero emission factor, directly
reducing the portfolio’s reported emissions
intensity. NZ-EC coverage across the portfolio
has grown from approximately 8% in FY25 to
12% this
year, with further uptake expected.
5554
Financial Results
Goodman NZ
Annual Report 2026
GNZ Bond Issuer Limited
Annual Report 2026
ContentsYear in ReviewOur BusinessSustainabilityClimate-related DisclosuresOther Information
REDUCTION PATHWAY – EMBODIED CARBON
kgCO
2
e/sqm
REDUCTION PATHWAY – WAREHOUSING PORTFOLIO
kgCO
2
e/sqm
REDUCTION PATHWAY – WHOLE PORTFOLIO
kgCO
2
e/sqm
BaselineGreen
Star
LED
upgrades
SolarSub-
metering
Emission
factor
RECsTa r g e t
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
9.0
10.0
BaselineGreen
Star
LED
upgrades
SolarSub-
metering
Emission
factor
Ta r g e t
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
BaseConcreteHot rolled
steel
Welded
steel
ReinforcingCladdingTa r g e t
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
Climate-related Disclosures
5756
Financial Results
Goodman NZ
Annual Report 2026
GNZ Bond Issuer Limited
Annual Report 2026
ContentsYear in ReviewOur BusinessSustainabilityClimate-related DisclosuresOther Information
Rainwater harvesting, low-flow fittings and other water-saving
technologies are key features of new developments.
Pictured is Tāwharau Lane, Highbrook Business Park,
which achieved a 6 Green Star Built rating.
Climate-related Disclosures
A summary of Goodman NZ’s FY26 greenhouse
gas emissions is presented below, together
with FY30 emission reduction targets.
22,415
TONNES CO
2
e
METRICS & TARGETS
1
Warehousing assets excludes users classified as data centres, cold storage, manufacturing, retail, office, cafeteria and parking.
CORPORATE EMISSIONS
4.0%
8 97. 6 tC O
2
e
Direct and indirect emissions
— Scope 1, 2 and 3
+ Fuel, fugitive refrigerants
+
P
urchased electricity
+
Waste generated in operations
+
Bus
iness travel
+
Couriers
+
E
mployee commuting
+
Transmission and
distribution
losses
FY30 Target
+ 43% reduction against
a 2020 base year
UPSTREAM EMISSIONS
41.9%
9,380.9 tCO
2
e
Indirect emissions
— Scope 3
+ Operating expenses on portfolio
+
C
apital expenditure on portfolio
+ Waste from demolitions
FY30 Target
+ 30% embodied carbon
intensity reduction
against a FY25 base year
DOWNSTREAM EMISSIONS
54.1%
12,136.0 tCO
2
e
Indirect emissions
— Scope 3
+ Customer energy consumption
+
P
ublic EV charging
+
End-of-life waste from sold assets
+
R
emaining lifetime energy use
of
sold assets
FY30 Target
+ Whole portfolio:
38% intensity reduction against
a FY25 base year using a
market-based approach
+
Warehousing assets
1
:
27% intensity reduction against
a
FY25 base year using a
location-based approach
APPROACH TO REPORTING SCOPE 3 EMISSIONS
We report Scope 3 emissions
both including and excluding variable
investment impacts to give a clearer
picture of our emissions performance.
Total Scope 3 emissions
This includes all indirect emissions across our value chain, including emissions related to
variable investment activity such as new developments embodied carbon, demolition waste,
the estimated future use and end
-of-life impacts of sold products. These emissions can vary
significantly from year to year depending on the amount of development or product sales
in
a given year.
Scope 3 emissions excluding variable investment impacts
This excludes variable investment-related, one
-off items and focuses on emissions from
our
ongoing operations. This disclosure helps make year-on-year trends more comparable.
FULL GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSION INVENTORY
Below is our FY26 inventory, covering our Scope 1,
Scope 2, and Scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions.
Where
available, the data includes comparisons to prior
periods. We use two base years – FY20 for corporate
emissions and FY25 for remaining Scope 3 emissions.
The FY26 emissions figures have been assured by PwC
1
.
Additional details on Goodman NZ’s calculation
approach, organisational boundary and consolidation
approach, base year and restatements and assumptions
and methodologies can be found in the ‘Measuring our
Emissions’ and ‘Inclusions and Methodologies’ sections
on
pages 66-73.
ScopeCorporate
emissionsScope 1 and 2 emissions
Gross tCO
2
e
FY26F Y25
2
F Y24
2
F Y20
1
Direct emissionsIncludes stationary diesel,
refrigerants
4 8 7.7192.3 255.0 482.0
2
Purchased electricityLocation-based method166.8 235.8 159.2 199.2
2
Purchased electricityMarket-based method3.80.0 2.4 n/a
Total location-based Scope 1 & 2 emissions654.5 428.2 414.2 681.2
Total market-based Scope 1 & 2 emissions491.5 192.3 2 5 7. 4 n/a
CatScope 3 emissions
1P
urchased goods and servicesOperating expenses across
the
stabilised portfolio
1,547.91,498.8 1 , 2 3 6 .7 n/a
2Capital goods (stabilised)Capital expenditure across
the
stabilised portfolio
3
7, 6 3 5 . 85,350.9 5 , 8 8 2 .7 n/a
3
Transmission and distribution losses12.517. 4 18.4 n/a
4
Freight transport agenciesCouriers 0.50.3 n/an/a
5
Waste generated in operationsWaste from management offices6 8 .768.4 33.9 4 0.6
6
Business travelIncludes flights, taxis, car hire59.65 7. 4 6 7. 9 181.9
7
Employee commutingIncludes working from home 102.0 158.0 10 4.3 212.3
11Use of sold products Public EV charging on GNZ
owned chargers
4 9.3 4 4.9 22.6 n/a
13Downstream leased assetsCustomer consumption across
GNZ’s stabilised portfolio
1 0 , 8 0 7. 3 1 0 , 3 7 7.7 7, 17 1 . 2 n/a
Total Scope 3 emissions excluding variable investment impacts20,283.417, 5 7 3 .7 1 4 , 5 3 7.7 434.8
2Capital goods (developments)Upfront embodied carbon for
development completions
0.0 23,831.0 26,436.8 n/a
5Waste generated in operationsWaste from demolitions1 9 7. 2n/an/an/a
11Use of sold products Remaining lifetime energy
consumption from a sold asset
1 , 0 3 7. 4 n/an/an/a
12End-of-life treatment of
sold products
Waste disposal at the end of life
of sold asset
242.1 n/an/an/a
T
otal Scope 3 emissions 21 ,76 0.0 41 , 4 0 4 .7 40,974.5 434.8
T
otal emissions (location-based)22,414.5 41,832.9 41 ,3 8 8 .7 1,116.0
Total emissions excluding variable investment impacts (location-based)20,937.818,001.914,951.91,116.0
Total corporate emissions (location-based)8 9 7. 6729.66 3 8 .71,116.0
T
otal corporate emissions (market-based)7 3 4 .7 493.84 81.9n/a
Market-based approach for customer operational energy
13Downstream leased assetsCustomer consumption across
GNZ’s stabilised portfolio
8,851.91 0 , 6 4 7. 0n/an/a
1
PwC has provided limited assurance over the FY26 total scope 1, scope 2 (location-based), scope 2 (market-based) and scope 3 emissions.
The PwC assurance report is on pages 75-77.
2
These figures have been restated from FY25 disclosures. Refer to the Restatements section on pages 66-67 for details on the nature,
reason, and impact of each restatement.
3
Emissions from the Highbrook Crossing upgrade are included under this line item.
INVENTORY OVERVIEW
Sold products, Scope 3 Category 11 and 12
This year we are reporting sold product emissions for the first
time. These emissions capture the future greenhouse gas
impacts of buildings sold in the year and account for 5.7% of
total emissions (1,279 tCO
2
e).
Emissions from electricity use over the building’s remaining
life are reported under Scope 3 Category 11, while emissions
associated with demolition and disposal at the end of the
building’s life are reported under Scope 3 Category 12.
These emissions are estimates and may vary over time due
to long asset lifespans and uncertainty around future use and
end
-of-life treatment.
Demolition waste, Scope 3 Category 5
The demolition of older buildings ahead of the redevelopment
at Mt Wellington generated 197 tCO
2
e. 94% of this
demolition waste was diverted from landfill and accounted for
105 t C O
2
e. 6% of waste to landfill accounted for 92 tCO
2
e.
In-use emissions, Scope 3 Category 13
In-use emissions are our largest source of emissions in FY26,
generated from electricity and gas consumed by customers
in leased spaces outside our operational control.
In FY26, 72% of in-use emissions data was sourced from
utility bills and submeter readings. Where direct data was
unavailable, estimates were derived using benchmarks from
the New
Zealand Green Building Council (NZGBC) or data
from U.S. commercial building surveys. Further detail on this
methodology can be found on pages 72-73.
The emissions profile varies significantly across customer
types. Customers with the highest energy intensity include
cool stores, a data centre and manufacturing facilities. These
make up 21% of the leased portfolio by NLA but account for
64% of in-use emissions. Key levers for reducing emissions
from these customers include electrification, large-scale solar
and renewable energy instruments.
Warehousing makes up 73% of the leased portfolio by NLA
and 30% by in-use emissions. Emission reduction across
the warehousing portfolio is influenced more by base build
energy efficiency. Building upgrades that include lighting,
submetering and solar are expected to deliver meaningful
reductions for these customers.
Metrics & Targets (continued)
49.4
kgCO
2
e
24.5
kgCO
2
e
3 .7
kgCO
2
e
10.7
kgCO
2
e
1,200,432 sqm10,807 t C O
2
e
9.2
kgCO
2
e
FY26 SCOPE 3 CATEGORY 13 SUMMARY
High Intensity
1,476 t C O
2
e
Manufacturing
5,395 t C O
2
e
Warehousing
3,208 t C O
2
e
Other 729 tCO
2
e
Manufacturing
220,613 s q m
Warehousing
855,995 sqm
Other 68,100 sqm
Vacan cy
High Intensity 29,892 sqm
5958
Financial Results
Goodman NZ
Annual Report 2026
GNZ Bond Issuer Limited
Annual Report 2026
ContentsYear in ReviewOur BusinessSustainabilityClimate-related DisclosuresOther InformationClimate-related Disclosures
Portfolio areaIntensityEnergy use
Emissions intensity and trends
Emissions intensity is presented using denominators that reflect the net lettable area (NLA) and revenue of our properties.
For
upfront embodied carbon from completed developments (Scope 3 Category 2), intensity is calculated using the
developments’ NLA and associated rental income at completion. For in-use emissions, intensity is based on leased area
across the portfolio and rental income. This leased area includes Great South Road Estate, which is excluded from NLA due to
the
ground lease nature of the improvements. All other intensity metrics use NLA and rental income across the total portfolio.
EMISSIONS INTENSITY BY SCOPE
kgCO
2
e per sqm NLAtCO
2
e per $m rental income
FY26F Y25F Y24F Y20FY26F Y25F Y24F Y20
Scope 10.420.160.22 0.46 2.20.81.33.3
Scope 20.140.190.14 0.19 0.81.00.81.4
Scope 318.5434.23 35.55 n /a10 0.0 17 9. 6 2 0 1 .7 n /a
Total emissions19.1034.58 35.91 n /a103.0 181.5 203.8 n /a
Total excluding variable investments 17. 8 4 14.88 12.97 n /a96.2 78.1 73.6 n /a
KEY EMISSIONS INTENSITY METRICS
Corporate emissions0 .760.60 0.55 1.05 4.13.23.17.7
Embodied emissions, Scope 3 Cat 2
(developments)
n /a474 428 n /an /a2,3202,188 n /a
In-use emissions, Scope 3 Cat 13
Whole portfolio, location-based9.28.6 6.2 n /a4 9 .7 45.0 35.3 n /a
Warehousing, location-based3 .74.54 .7n /a
Whole portfolio, market-based7. 58.8n /an /a
BASIS FOR CALCULATING INTENSITY
NLA (sqm)Net operating income ($m)
FY26F Y25F Y24F Y20FY26F Y25F Y24F Y20
Total portfolio
1
1 ,17 3 ,7 5 5
2
1,209,581 1,152,546 1,059,263 2 17. 6230.520 3.114 5.3
Development completionsn /a50,2866 1,73 7 n /an /a10.3 12.1 n /a
1
Portfolio metrics reflect 100% of Highbrook properties.
2
The leased area used as a basis for in-use emissions is 1,174,600 for FY26.
EMISSIONS INTENSITY TRENDS AND DRIVERS
Scope 11.2% above FY20 base year on an absolute basis. 9% below FY20 base year on an NLA intensity basis.
Subject to fluctuation due to timing of refrigerant leaks and use of diesel generators. The trend has been
downwards but rose in FY26 due to a number of R410A refrigerant leaks.
Scope 216% below FY20 base year on an absolute basis. 24% below FY20 base year on an NLA intensity basis.
The reduction is principally attributed to solar installations on office assets’
common areas.
Scope 3Subject to fluctuation due to volume and timing of investment activity and reporting of embodied carbon
and in-use emissions from sold assets. The 47% reduction in absolute emissions and 46% reduction on
an NLA intensity basis of emissions from FY25 was a result of no embodied carbon from developments
(Scope 3, Category 2) as there were no development completions in FY26.
Total emissionsCombination of the above – most influenced by Scope 3 emissions which made up 97% of total emissions
in FY26. Intensity (over NLA) was 45% lower than FY25 due to the lack of development completions.
Total emissions
excluding
variable
investment activity
Most influenced by customers’ in-use emissions and portfolio capex and opex. The 16% increase on
an
absolute basis from FY25 to FY26 was mostly due to higher capex across the stabilised portfolio in
the
period.
Metrics & Targets (continued)
CORPORATE
EMISSIONS TARGETS
CORPORATE EMISSIONS (ABSOLUTE)
Target
REDUCE BY
43% by F Y30
The target is to reduce corporate emissions by 43%
by FY30, from a base year of FY20.
Coverage
Scope 1, Scope 2, Scope 3 Categories 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7
– 4.0% of all GHG emissions for FY26.
Progress
In FY26, Goodman NZ achieved a 19.6% reduction in
corporate emissions from its FY20 base year, resulting in total
gross emissions of 897.6 tCO
2
e.
As part of our commitment to reducing corporate emissions,
we have obtained Toitū net carbonzero certification for FY26.
This certification confirms that our emissions have been
accurately measured and verified in accordance with the
ISO
14064-1:2018 standard for the purpose of achieving
the Toitū certification. These emissions have been matched
with locally sourced carbon credits for residual Scope 1 and
3 emissions, New Zealand Energy Certificates (NZ-ECs)
from
Meridian and Mercury for Scope 2 electricity use,
and carbon credits for any residual Scope 2 emissions not
covered by NZ-ECs.
The approach for achieving this target can be seen in our
Transition Plan on pages 54-55.
Efficient LED lighting to reduce
operational energy consumption.
6160
Financial Results
Goodman NZ
Annual Report 2026
GNZ Bond Issuer Limited
Annual Report 2026
ContentsYear in ReviewOur BusinessSustainabilityClimate-related DisclosuresOther InformationClimate-related Disclosures
The Board set near-term science-aligned reduction targets
for GNZ’s Scope 3 emissions in 2025. While absolute
emissions may increase with development activity or portfolio
growth, these targets focus on reducing the intensity of
our emissions. Toitū
has provided an independent review
confirming that these targets have been set using the SBTi’s
Building Sector Science-Based Target Setting
Criteria. Our
targets do not rely on offsets, except for our market-based
approach target for in-use emissions intensity.
The FY25 baselines have been restated for embodied
carbon, following completion of final life cycle assessments,
and for in-use emissions, following the release of updated
emission factors from the Ministry for the Environment and
Bravetrace, and updated gas emissions data. For in-use
emissions, the higher baselines have resulted in revised
reduction targets. These have been restated to the right.
The pathways and approach for achieving these targets
can
be seen in our Transition Plan on pages 54-55.
SCIENCE-ALIGNED TARGETS
EMBODIED EMISSIONS INTENSITY
Target
REDUCE BY
30.4% by F Y30
The target includes reducing the upfront embodied GHG
emissions intensity of new building developments by 30.4%
by FY30, from a base year of FY25.
Coverage and Baseline
Scope 3 Category 2 – Capital goods (developments).
FY25 baseline intensity: 474 kgCO
2
e per sqm.
FY26 intensity:
0 k
gCO
2
e per sqm
(no developments completed in FY26).
IN-USE EMISSIONS INTENSITY
Target
REDUCE BY
3 7. 6 % using a market-based approach
by F Y30
The target is to reduce in-use operational GHG emissions
intensity for the leased building portfolio by 37.6% by the
end of FY30, from a base year of FY25 and applying a
market-based approach.
Coverage and Baseline
Scope 3 Category 13 – Downstream leased assets
(whole portfolio) – 43.6% of all GHG emissions for FY26.
FY25 baseline intensity: 8.8 kgCO
2
e per sqm.
FY26 intensity:
7
.5 kgCO
2
e per sqm
15% reduction from FY25.
Target
REDUCE FOR WAREHOUSING BY
26.9% using a location-based approach
by F Y30
The target is to reduce in-use GHG emissions intensity for
the leased warehouse portfolio by 26.9% by the end of
FY30, from a base year of FY25 and applying a location-
based approach.
Coverage and Baseline
Scope 3 Category 13 – Downstream leased assets
(warehouse portfolio) – 14.3% of all GHG emissions for FY26.
FY25 baseline intensity: 4.5 kgCO
2
e per sqm.
FY26 intensity: 3.7 kgCO
2
e per sqm
17% reduction from FY25.
Capital deployment
In FY26, we invested in projects addressing climate risks and opportunities, focusing on energy efficiency, carbon
reduction, and climate resilience. The table below outlines our progress and capital allocation, which aligns with our
transition plan to capture climate-related opportunities and manage associated risks. Total capital deployment in FY25
was $52.8 million, which has decreased to $16.8 million in FY26 due to lower development volumes.
TargetF Y26 ProgressFY26 SpendLink to transition plan
Minimum 5 Green Star
rating targeted for all
new
developments
Mt Wellington redevelopment further
progressed this financial year, and is
targeting a 6
Green Star Built rating.
$13.1mThis spend supports the Building
Materials and Climate Resilience
pillars by promoting low-carbon
construction methods and
delivering high-performance
developments that are better
equipped to withstand climate-
related risks.
Reduction in upfront
embodied carbon of
10% to 20% for new
developments compared
to similar reference building
Collaboration with MSC, Beca and
BQH has led to updated building
specifications and lower
-carbon
material targets, which have
been applied at the Mt Wellington
development.
$23kThis aligns with the Building
Materials pillar of the transition
plan, supporting the use of lower
GWP materials and promoting
innovation in construction
practices.
Replace 100% of R22
HVAC systems in the Core
Portfolio with lower GWP
Removal of higher
-GWP HVAC
systems reduces the risk of assets
becoming stranded. All 43 systems
have now been upgraded, completing
the renewal programme (100%).
$0.4mThis spend supports the
Corporate Emissions pillar by
reducing the GWP associated
with refrigerant leaks, which are
currently a significant source
of Goodman NZ’s corporate
emissions.
Submetering for 100%
of
the Core Portfolio
The submetering programme helps
customers measure energy use and
identify opportunities for emission
reduction. Including completed
developments, over 710,000 sqm of
space now has submetering installed,
or in progress equating to 71% of the
Core Portfolio.
$2mThis supports the Customer
Footprints pillar by enabling
customers to monitor and reduce
their operational emissions.
LED lighting for 100%
of
Core Portfolio
By ensuring that the Core Portfolio
is more energy efficient, customers
can reduce their operational
emissions. 98% of the Core Portfolio
now features LED lighting as of
31
March 2026.
$1.2mThis spend supports the
Customer Footprints pillar by
improving energy efficiency
across the Core Portfolio.
Solar installations total
at
least 2.0 MWp
Over 350,000 sqm of GNZ’s
portfolio now benefits from over
2.9 MWp onsite renewable
generation, ensuring reduced
reliance on the grid and more
energy resilience for customers.
$50kThis initiative supports both the
Customer Footprints and Climate
Resilience pillar by reducing
reliance on grid electricity and
enhancing energy resilience.
Metrics & Targets (continued)
EV charging stations
to promote sustainable commuting and reduce carbon emissions.
6362
Financial Results
Goodman NZ
Annual Report 2026
GNZ Bond Issuer Limited
Annual Report 2026
ContentsYear in ReviewOur BusinessSustainabilityClimate-related DisclosuresOther InformationClimate-related Disclosures
OTHER CLIMATE-RELATED METRICS
Climate-related risks
We have undertaken an assessment of assets’ vulnerability to
physical and transitional risks, and the opportunities arising.
A quantitative approach for physical risks, and a qualitative
approach for transition risks and opportunities has been used.
Climate-related opportunities
The identification of climate-related risks for our business
also highlighted corresponding opportunities to build a more
resource efficient and resilient property portfolio, boost
customer productivity and grow our business sustainably
through green financing initiatives. These are all strategic
objectives, that if achieved would make GNZ a leader in
sustainable warehouse and logistics property
solutions.
By integrating sustainability features such as solar panels,
electrical submetering, and LED lighting, and prioritising
the reduction of embodied carbon through the use of
lower-carbon materials and innovative building methods,
Goodman
NZ continues to strengthen its commitment to
climate-related opportunities across both new developments
and existing assets.
Approximately 84% of the Core Portfolio has been upgraded
with new Smart LEDs, lower GWP refrigerant, electrical
submetering and solar over the last five years. Properties eligible
for Sustainable Finance now make up 14% of the Core Portfolio.
Internal emissions price
From FY26, Goodman NZ replaced the use of carbon credits
to offset upfront embodied carbon from developments
with an internal cost of carbon allocated to the Embodied
Carbon Innovation Fund (ECIF). Rather than retiring credits
to match embodied emissions, development budgets now
include a cost of carbon allowance that is pooled into the
ECIF and directed towards trialling materials and construction
techniques that target lower upfront embodied carbon
intensity over the longer term.
The internal cost of carbon has been set at $50 per tCO
2
e
for the past five years, providing a consistent basis for project
feasibility assessments and investment decisions. For FY26,
this rate was reaffirmed and informed by the contracted cost
of high-quality carbon credits acquired for recently completed
development projects (23,831 credits purchased based
on finalised Life Cycle Assessments, averaging $50.60 per
tCO
2
e) alongside prevailing New Zealand Emissions Trading
Scheme (ETS) carbon unit pricing. Internal carbon prices
adopted by peer organisations were also considered, and
Goodman NZ’s adopted price was found to be consistent with
the
range observed across comparable entities.
The internal cost of carbon will be reviewed annually by the
Board.
Goodman NZ’s Toitū net carbonzero certification continues
to require the purchase and retirement of carbon credits
to match remaining corporate emissions. We choose
New
Zealand Permanent Forest Sink Initiative (PFSI) carbon
credits and in FY26 the cost of these was $90.13 per tCO
2
e.
MetricEvaluationCommentaryResponse
Assets vulnerable
to physical risks
Physical climate-risk
assessment conducted
by
Aon Risk Consultants
Climate change is expected to
increase hazard levels, with pluvial
(rainfall-induced) flooding identified
as the most prevalent physical risk to
Goodman NZ’s portfolio. Under the
most extreme scenario, Aon
modelled
four assets susceptible to damage
impacts with ‘moderate or high
exposure’. As at 31st March 2026,
these assets represent 3.5% of the
portfolio by Net Lettable Area (NLA).
This is lower by 0.3% compared to
31st March 2025. By rental income,
the exposure reduced from 3.2% in
FY25 to 3.0% in FY26. Adjusting for
ownership share of Highbrook, these
assets represent 4% of the portfolio
with a rental exposure rate of 3%.
To mitigate these risks,
Goodman NZ have implemented
comprehensive building and
income
protection insurance,
regular maintenance
programmes, and plans for future
resilient developments. These
measures are part
of a broader
strategy to build long-term
climate risk readiness.
Assets vulnerable
to transitional risks
As analysed in the
strategy section of this
report (pages
48-53),
Goodman NZ faces
one or more transition
risks, identified in its risk
assessment
Among the risks identified, market
and regulatory risks were the most
significant, influencing property
investment choices, development
processes, and portfolio and
supply chain management. Value-
add assets are considered most
at risk of becoming stranded due
to these
transitional risks. Due to
the sale of an asset this year, the
proportion of Value Add assets
has increased from 14.5% in FY25
to
15.3% of NLA this year.
Goodman NZ will address these
transition risks by implementing
the transition plan and actions
outlined on pages 54-55. By
prioritising the development of
low-carbon, energy-efficient
assets, we believe Goodman NZ
is well-positioned to
manage the
identified transition risks.
EXCLUSIONS FROM EMISSIONS INVENTORY
Scope + CategoryGHG Emissions SourceReason for Exclusion
Excluded as not applicable to GNZ’s business activities
Scope 3 – Category 9Downstream Transportation
& Distribution
Scope 3 – Category 10Processing of Sold Products
Scope 3 – Category 14Franchises
Scope 3 – Category 15Investments
Excluded due to other reasons
Scope 3 – Category 6Hotel StaysHotel stays are an optional inclusion under the GHG
Protocol and have not been included.
Scope 3 – Category 13Tenant Waste and WaterExcluded due to the wide variability in waste and water use
across our industrial customer base. Reliable estimates
are not practical given the range of customer operations.
Performance linked remuneration
Sustainability is one of our four core values as a business and
an area of individual and collective responsibility. All 67 eligible
employees are assessed against these values as part of the
annual performance review process.
For FY26 (effective 1 April 2025), GNZ implemented a
Short-Term Incentive framework that provides a robust and
transparent structure for the Board to recognise and reward
performance for all eligible employees. The framework links
discretionary cash payments directly to the achievement of
annual business and individual performance outcomes.
Sustainability was integrated as one of seven business
performance measures in the FY26 STI scorecard under the
strategic objectives pillar, specifically focused on advancing
sustainability upgrades across the Core Portfolio and making
measurable progress toward FY30 embodied and in-use
emission reduction targets. For FY26, strategic objectives
determined 50% of the STI for the CEO and 30% of the
STI for executives. The Board assessed the FY26 strategic
pillar (including sustainability objectives) at a solid level
of performance, with 84% of that pillar achieved. Further
information about the short-term incentive scorecard can be
found on pages 158-159 within the remuneration report.
Individual performance is another pillar of the FY26 STI
scorecard. 10 employees had specific environmental
sustainability objectives assigned to their roles, with varying
weightings, for FY26. Individual performance determines
between 40% and 70% of the STI.
By integrating sustainability features such
as solar panels, electrical submetering,
and LED lighting, and prioritising the
reduction of embodied carbon through
the use of lower-carbon materials and
innovative building methods, Goodman NZ
continues to strengthen its commitment to
climate-related opportunities across both
new developments and existing assets.
Tāwharau Lane
Rooftop 83 kWp solar energy systems forecast
to cover over 50% of the building’s baseload.
6564
Financial Results
Goodman NZ
Annual Report 2026
GNZ Bond Issuer Limited
Annual Report 2026
ContentsYear in ReviewOur BusinessSustainabilityClimate-related DisclosuresOther InformationClimate-related Disclosures
Stanley Black and Decker,
Highbrook Business Park,
achieved a 6 Green Star Built rating.
6766
Financial Results
Goodman NZ
Annual Report 2026
GNZ Bond Issuer Limited
Annual Report 2026
ContentsYear in ReviewOur BusinessSustainabilityClimate-related DisclosuresOther InformationClimate-related Disclosures
MEASURING
OUR EMISSIONS
Calculation Approach
Our GHG emissions have been calculated in accordance
with Aotearoa New
Zealand Climate Standards (NZ CS) and
the Greenhouse Gas Protocol – A Corporate Accounting
and Reporting
Standard (2004) (‘GHG Protocol’) and the
Greenhouse
Gas Protocol, Scope 2 Guidance (2015).
Emission factors use the 100-year time horizon GWP values
from the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report and IPCC Fifth
Assessment Report.
Organisational Boundary and Consolidation Approach
Goodman NZ applies an operational control approach to
define the boundary of its greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions
reporting. Under this approach, we account for emissions
and removals from facilities where we have the authority
to implement operational policies. This allows us to focus
on emission sources we can directly influence and take
action on, ensuring our emissions reduction efforts align
with
Goodman NZ’s broader sustainability strategy.
Our organisational boundary includes all facilities and
activities over which Goodman NZ has operational control,
covering investment, development, and property services.
The definition of control for climate-related disclosures
differs from the definition of control applied in preparing the
financial statements included in this Annual Report. During
FY26, a 28.9% interest in Highbrook Business Park was sold
to investors via a limited partnership. The transaction led
to Highbrook Business Park being derecognised from the
FY26
Financial Results, however, for the purposes of climate-
related disclosures, as Goodman NZ retains management
authority over operating policies, utility accounts and
site contracts, Highbrook remains within Goodman
NZ’s
organisational boundary.
Base Year
Our base year for corporate emissions is the 12-month
period from 1 April 2019 to 31 March 2020, in alignment
with New
Zealand’s standard financial reporting calendar.
Our base year for all other Scope 3 emissions, including
upfront embodied carbon (Scope 3, Category 2,
developments) and in-use emissions (Scope 3 Category 13)
is 1 April 2024 to 31 March 2025, as this reporting period
aligns with the new targets established.
Restatements
In FY26, we restated emissions for eight categories to reflect
updated emission factors, the finalisation of documents,
and improve the accuracy of our previously estimated gas
consumption data. These restatements were made to
improve the
accuracy and consistency of our emissions
inventory.
Details of Gas Consumption Data Update
The method used to identify and estimate gas use in customers’
properties was updated in FY26 using more complete data.
Comparative reporting for FY24 and FY25 has been updated
to align with the revised estimation method.
Scope 3 Category 13 (Location-based approach for
downstream leased assets)
Emissions relating to gas consumption have been restated
for FY25, increasing location-based Scope 3 Category 13
emissions by 1,840.3 tCO
2
e.
FY24 emissions have also been restated, increasing location-
based Scope 3 Category 13 emissions by 1,067.2 tCO
2
e.
Scope 3 Category 13 (Market-based approach for
downstream leased assets)
Emissions relating to gas consumption have been restated
for FY25, increasing market-based Scope 3 Category 13
emissions by 1,916.5 tCO
2
e.
Details of Updated Emission Factor Restatements
When GNZ’s FY25 disclosures were published, the Ministry
for the Environment and BraveTrace had not yet released
their 2025 emission factors, and 2024 factors were
therefore applied. FY25 emissions have since been restated
using the 2025 emission factors to improve accuracy and
ensure consistency.
Scope 2 (Location-based)
Purchased electricity emissions have been restated for FY25,
adding 71.4 tCO
2
e to Scope 2 location-based emissions.
Scope 3 Category 3 (Transmission and distribution losses)
Emissions related to transmission and distribution losses
have been restated for FY25, adding 7.9 tCO
2
e to Scope 3
Category
3 emissions.
Scope 3 Category 5 (Waste generated in operations,
management offices)
Waste generated from Goodman NZ offices has been
restated for FY25, decreasing Scope 3 Category 5 emissions
by 4.3
tCO
2
e.
Scope 3 Category 6 (Business travel)
Business travel emissions have been restated for FY25,
adding 0.2 tCO
2
e to Scope 3 Category 6 emissions.
Scope 3 Category 11 (Use of sold products)
Emissions related to public EV charging on GNZ-owned
chargers have been restated for FY25, increasing Scope 3
Category 11 emissions by 12.5 tCO
2
e.
Scope 3 Category 13 (Location-based approach for
downstream leased assets)
Emissions relating to customer electricity and gas
consumption across Goodman NZ’s portfolio have been
restated for FY25, increasing location-based Scope 3
Category 13 emissions by 2,322.1 tCO
2
e.
Scope 3 Category 13 (Market-based approach for
downstream leased assets)
Emissions relating to customer electricity and gas
consumption across Goodman NZ’s portfolio have been
restated for FY25, increasing market-based Scope 3
Category 13 emissions by 2,438.4 tCO
2
e.
Details of the Embodied Carbon Restatement
Scope 3 Category 2 (Capital Goods – Developments)
Due to the finalisation of documents, Scope 3 Category 2
for development capital goods has been restated for FY25.
This revision follows a decrease of 739 tCO
2
e realised
after the Whole of Life As Built LCA’s were finalised and
independently peer-reviewed in the first half of FY26.
To calculate our corporate emissions, we employed
Toitū’s carbon emissions assessment and reporting tool,
eManage. Within this system, a mix of emission factors
were utilised, including:
1
Ministry for the Environment (2025).
Measuring emissions: A guide for organisations:
2025 detailed guide
1
.
2 BraveTrace (2025). Annual Production Year Report:
Including Residual Supply Mix (RSM) for New Zealand.
2
3 Turner, David & Williams, Ian & Kemp, Simon (2015).
Greenhouse gas emission factors for recycling of
source-segregated waste materials. Resources,
Conservation and Recycling. 2015, pages 186-191.
4
M
arket Economics Limited (2023).
Consumption Emissions Modelling, report prepared
for Auckland
Council.
5 Climalife. Climalife IDS Refrigeration Ltd
6 New Zealand Energy Certificate System (2025/2026).
Remaining emissions, not calculated in eManage were
calculated using the following emission factors:
7 Ministry for the Environment (2025).
Measuring emissions: A guide for organisations:
2025 detailed guide
1
.
8 Market Economics Limited (2023).
Consumption Emissions Modelling, report prepared
for Auckland
Council.
9
N
ew Zealand Energy Certificate System
(2025/2026).
10 One Click LCA Ltd. Global LCA database.
11 Bullen, L (2020). Life cycle-based environmental
impacts of
future New Zealand electricity supply.
12 UK BEIS (2022). Greenhouse gas reporting:
conversion factors.
13 New Zealand Green Building Council (2024).
Embodied Carbon Methodology – v2.0.
14
B
RANZ (2021). NZ grid electricity factors
(Module
B6, MBIE/ICCC 2019 scenarios).
15
B
raveTrace. (2025). NZECS Production Year
2025 Annual
Report.
1
The Ministry for the Environment released its 2026 guidance in
May 2026, after completion of our inventory and with insufficient time
and resources available to update the emissions factors. Our FY26
inventory therefore applies emission factors from the 2025 guidance.
The 2026 guidance includes emission factors that are materially
different to those in the 2025 guidance and would likely have a material
impact on our GHG emission disclosures.
2
BraveTrace has yet to release its 2026 Annual Production Year Report.
Interim factors for FY26 have been published but have not been applied,
as market-based emission factors are updated only upon release of the
finalised BraveTrace report.
6968
Financial Results
Goodman NZ
Annual Report 2026
GNZ Bond Issuer Limited
Annual Report 2026
ContentsYear in ReviewOur BusinessSustainabilityClimate-related DisclosuresOther InformationClimate-related Disclosures
INCLUSIONS AND METHODOLOGIES
CategoryGHG Emissions SourceData Source Assumptions and MethodologyEmission FactorData QualityUncertainty
1
SCOPE 1
Fugitive
emissions
Leakage and replacement
quantities to top up
the refrigerants of air
conditioning systems.
Supplier recordsBuilding managers meet with HVAC contractors monthly and
report on refrigerant leak data, specifying the refrigerant type and
quantity. For any data gaps, the supplier is approached directly.
All properties within the portfolio where the HVAC is owned and
maintained by Goodman NZ are recorded. An emission factor is
then applied against the kg recorded.
1
5
MEDIUM:
Supplier-provided records are considered generally
reliable, however, accuracy in the monthly reports may be
affected by manual data entry.
MEDIUM:
Relies on manual reporting by the contractor.
SCOPE 1
Stationary
combustion
Diesel fuel used to top up
sprinkler systems.
Internal property
management
system
For properties within the portfolio where Goodman NZ owns and
maintains diesel-powered sprinkler systems, jobs are extracted
from the asset management software, with descriptions that
include the volume (litres) of diesel used. Emissions from these
diesel top-ups are recognised based on the Work Order entry
date, which is when the job is logged in the financial system,
rather than the physical refuelling date. This approach aligns with
Goodman
NZ’s methodology from previous reporting years and
provides a consistent basis for emissions reporting. An emission
factor is then applied against the litres recorded.
1
MEDIUM:
Internal asset management system is generally accurate,
however accuracy may be affected by manual data entry.
MEDIUM:
Relies on manually entered job descriptions.
SCOPE 2
Purchased
electricity
(location-
based)
Electricity used
in common areas,
Goodman
NZ offices and
vacant property space.
Supplier records
managed by third
par ty.
Records of electricity consumed sourced from an independent
third party. A location-based emission factor is then applied
against
this kWh.
1
HIGH:
Supplier-provided records are considered generally reliable.
LOW:
Actual kWh is recorded, there is a low reliance on
estimation.
SCOPE 2
Purchased
electricity
(market-
based)
Electricity used
in common areas,
Goodman
NZ offices and
vacant property space.
Supplier records
and New Zealand
Energy Attribute
Certificates.
Records of electricity consumed are sourced from an independent
third party. New Zealand Energy Certificates (NZ
-ECs) are
redeemed through the New Zealand Energy Certificate System
(NZECS) against a portion of the kWh consumed, allowing that
electricity usage to be reported with a zero emission factor.
For
remaining electricity not covered by NZ-ECs, an emission
factor is applied.
2
6
HIGH:
Supplier-provided records are considered generally reliable.
LOW:
Actual kWh is recorded, there is a low reliance on
estimation.
Purchased
electricity
(location-
based)
Electricity used to charge
electric vehicles.
Supplier reportRecords of electricity consumed in pool car charging are
downloaded from both supplier websites. An emission factor
is
applied against this kWh.
1
HIGH:
Supplier-provided reports are considered generally reliable.
LOW:
Actual kWh is recorded, there is a low reliance on
estimation.
SCOPE 3
C AT EG O R Y 1
Purchased
goods and
services
Purchased goods and
services
Expenses report
extracted from
Goodman NZ’s
accounting
software.
Operational expenditure data is sourced from Goodman
NZ’s
finance system and mapped to emission factors from a
New Zealand consumption-based model. Emissions are calculated
by applying these factors to the relevant spend categories. As a
spend-based approach, results are
indicative only and depend
on the quality of the underlying model data and alignment with
Goodman NZ’s accounting codes.
8
HIGH:
Internal finance system is considered reliable.
HIGH:
Spend-based model relies on assumptions around
categorisations.
SCOPE 3
C AT EG O R Y 2
Capital goods
(stabilised)
Capital expenditure at
Goodman NZ’s properties
Expenses report
extracted from
Goodman NZ’s
accounting
software.
Capital goods expenditure is sourced from Goodman NZ’s finance
system and mapped to emission factors from a New
Zealand
consumption-based model. Emissions are calculated by applying
these factors to the relevant spend categories so that emissions
are recorded as the capital spend is incurred. As a spend-based
approach, results are indicative only and depend on the quality
of the underlying model data and alignment with Goodman NZ’s
accounting codes.
8
HIGH:
Internal finance system is considered reliable.
HIGH:
Spend-based model relies on assumptions around
categorisations.
1
GHG quantification is subject to inherent uncertainty due to incomplete scientific knowledge used to determine emissions factors and the values required
to
combine emissions from different gases.
Inclusions and Methodologies (continued)
7170
Financial Results
Goodman NZ
Annual Report 2026
GNZ Bond Issuer Limited
Annual Report 2026
ContentsYear in ReviewOur BusinessSustainabilityClimate-related DisclosuresOther InformationClimate-related Disclosures
CategoryGHG Emissions SourceData Source Assumptions and MethodologyEmission FactorData QualityUncertainty
1
SCOPE 3
C AT EG O R Y 2
Capital goods
(developments)
Upfront embodied carbon
in developments
Third party
Life Cycle
Assessments
(LCAs)
A whole-of-life carbon assessment is used to quantify the potential
carbon emissions impacts of a project including its upfront embodied
carbon. This comprises emissions from the extraction of raw
materials, transport of these materials and construction. The upfront
carbon emissions are derived from the One Click LCA Database
and follow the ISO 14040, ISO 14044 and EN 15978 standards.
Contractors provide Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs) for
materials where possible to improve data integrity which is relayed to a
third party and reviewed. Emissions are recognised for a development
in the period in which it completes using as
-built data as per the final
LCA. This approach aligns with the Ministry for the Environment’s
Embodied emissions of buildings guidance. As a result, capital
expenditure recognised in the financial results does not necessarily
align with the timing of embodied emissions recognition.
10
HIGH:
Data is prepared by industry experts and subject to peer
review.
LOW:
An independent industry expert used building quantities
and
a reputable embodied carbon database.
SCOPE 3
C AT EG O R Y 3
Transmission
and distribution
losses
Electricity lost during the
process of transporting and
distributing
Supplier reportsElectricity usage (kWh) from supplier records is multiplied by the
national average emissions factor for losses.
1
HIGH:
Supplier-provided records are considered generally
reliable.
MEDIUM:
Calculated using supplier data and standard emissions
factors. Minimal estimation required.
C AT EG O R Y 4
Freight
transport
agencies
CouriersInternal finance
system
Total spend from courier invoices is extracted from our internal
finance system and is multiplied by the relevant emission factor.
4
HIGH:
Internal finance system is considered reliable.
HIGH:
Spend-based model relies on assumptions around
categorisations.
C AT EG O R Y 5
Waste
generated in
operations
Waste from Goodman NZ’s
head
offices
Supplier reportsQuantities of waste (tonnes) from the two office sites are sourced
from supplier records. All landfill sites are assumed to utilise landfill
gas recovery. At one office with multiple tenancies, the waste data is
pro-rated on a floor area basis. The relevant emission factor is
then
applied to this tonnage.
1
3
HIGH:
Supplier-provided records are considered generally
reliable.
MEDIUM:
Floor area has apportioned data, introducing estimation.
Demolition waste
Supplier reportsQuantities of waste (tonnes) from development sites are sourced
from demolition supplier reports. The relevant emission factor is
then applied to this tonnage depending on waste typology.
7
12
13
HIGH:
Supplier-provided records are considered generally
reliable.
LOW:
Calculated using supplier data and standard emissions
factors. Minimal estimation required.
C AT EG O R Y 6
Business travel
FlightsSupplier reportsRecords from invoices and travelcards confirm the destination
travelled to/from and number of passengers. Using the my climate
flight calculator, distance each way is obtained, and an emission
factor is applied against this.
1
HIGH:
Supplier invoices and the myclimate website are generally
considered reliable.
LOW:
Based on actual travel data and class of travel known.
Minimal
estimation required.
Ta x i sInternal finance
system
Total spend from supplier invoices is extracted from our internal
finance system and is multiplied by the relevant emission factor.
1
HIGH:
Internal finance system is considered reliable.
HIGH:
Spend-based model relies on assumptions around
categorisations and vehicle type not captured.
RidesharesSupplier reportReport downloaded directly from supplier website. Distance is
recorded in miles, which is converted to km and an emission factor
is applied against this.
1
HIGH:
Supplier invoices and summaries are generally considered
reliable.
LOW:
Based on actual distance data. Minimal estimation
required.
MileageInternal finance
system
A report detailing the costs of mileage claims is downloaded.
These costs are converted into kilometres travelled using the IRD’s
published kilometre rates, and an average car emission factor is
then applied to calculate emissions.
1
HIGH:
Internal finance system is considered reliable when
calculating kilometres travelled.
MEDIUM:
Based on IRD rates and average emission factors, as
actual car type is not known.
Fuel cardsSupplier reportMonthly reports are generated by the supplier, detailing
the total volume and type of fuel used by employees.
The appropriate emission factor is then applied to this literage.
1
HIGH:
Supplier invoices and summaries are generally considered
reliable.
LOW:
Based on actual fuel volumes with minimal estimation.
C AT EG O R Y 7
Employee
commuting
Employee commutingEmployee surveyA 2025 staff survey captured commuting distance, mode,
frequency, and work-from-home days. Survey responses
were used to estimate typical commuting behaviour for FY26.
Average annual commuting distances were calculated by transport
mode, adjusted to reflect time spent working from home, and
applied across the workforce. Emissions were then calculated
using relevant emissions factors.
7
MEDIUM:
Impacted by number of responses and interpretation
of survey questions.
MEDIUM:
Based on survey responses and extrapolation.
C AT EG O R Y 11
Use of sold
products
Public EV charging on
Goodman NZ owned
chargers
Supplier reportsReport downloaded directly from supplier website. Electricity (kWh)
is recorded and an emission factor is applied against this.
7
HIGH:
Supplier invoices and summaries are generally considered
reliable.
LOW:
Based on actual electricity consumption data with minimal
assumptions.
1
GHG quantification is subject to inherent uncertainty due to incomplete scientific knowledge used to determine emissions factors and the values required
to
combine emissions from different gases.
Inclusions and Methodologies (continued)
7372
Financial Results
Goodman NZ
Annual Report 2026
GNZ Bond Issuer Limited
Annual Report 2026
ContentsYear in ReviewOur BusinessSustainabilityClimate-related DisclosuresOther InformationClimate-related Disclosures
CategoryGHG Emissions SourceData Source Assumptions and MethodologyEmission FactorData QualityUncertainty
1
SCOPE 3
C AT EG O R Y 11
Use of sold
products
Remaining lifetime energy
consumption from a sold
asset
Supplier reports
and modelling
Annual electricity consumption for the sold asset is based on the
historical average consumption of the sold property in the two years
prior to its sale. Emissions from the year of sale to 2050 are calculated
by applying projected NZ grid electricity emission factors derived
from BRANZ electricity datasets (BRANZ, 2019), based on a life
cycle model developed by Bullen (2020), under the ‘Environmental’
decarbonisation pathway. These factors are applied as a straight
-l
ine
annual reduction to the latest MfE electricity emission factor, with
the projected factor then multiplied by annual kWh consumption.
A
60-year building life and consistent kWh consumption are assumed,
with 58 years remaining at the point of sale. Electricity emissions after
2050 are assumed to be zero due to New
Zealand’s net-zero 2050
target. There is a higher level of estimation uncertainty around the
forecast emissions factor reaching net-zero by 2050, including the
trajectory of reduction across the period as used in our calculations.
The forecast emission factor is subject to many variables around the
future of New
Zealand’s sources of electricity and the grid mix that
are outside of our control.
7
11
14
HIGH:
Electricity consumption is based on actual data.
HIGH:
Results rely on multiple long-term assumptions.
SCOPE 3
C AT EG O R Y 12
End-of-life
treatment of
sold products
End of life treatment from
a sold asset
Third party
Life Cycle
Assessments
(LCAs)
A whole
-of-life carbon assessment for the sold asset was prepared
by a third-party consultant and subject to peer review. These
assessments are derived from the One Click LCA database and
aligned with ISO 14040, ISO 14044, and EN 15978 standards.
End
-of-life emissions for the sold asset were calculated as part of
this based on emission factors within the database.
10
HIGH:
Data is prepared by industry experts and subject to peer
review.
MEDIUM:
Assumptions are required due to long asset lifespans and
the difficulty of predicting future waste practices.
C AT EG O R Y 13
Downstream
leased assets
Customer electricity
consumption
Data downloaded
from online
submetering
system
For properties with submetering, monthly electricity consumption
(kWh) is extracted from the online platform. Where submetering data
is unavailable for part of the year, usage is estimated using the average
of available months. The kWh calculated includes grid feed-in and
solar self-consumption. The solar self-consumption is recorded at a
zero emission factor. An appropriate emission factor is then applied.
7
15
HIGH:
Assumed submetering records are correct.
LOW:
Actual submetered data is used with minimal estimation.
Customer electricity and
gas
consumption
Supplier records
managed by
third party
In most cases, for properties that are not submetered and we have
permission to access their utility records, this data is used. A third
party collates this data for us and uploads it to an online portal.
kWh
usage can directly be downloaded by property, and an
emission factor is applied against this for gas and electricity.
For
properties where data was not available for the full year, data
from FY25 was used where available. If this data was not available,
an average of FY24 data was used.
7
15
HIGH:
Assumed utility data records are correct.
MEDIUM:
Based on partial year data and use of prior year averages
where current data was unavailable.
Customer gas
consumption
Supplier recordsFor properties where gas supplier records were not available from
the
third party (above), we reached out directly to the gas supplier to
obtain usage data. The relevant emission factor was then applied to this.
7
HIGH:
Assumed utility data records are correct.
LOW:
Based on actual gas data with minimal estimation.
Customer electricity
consumption
Benchmarks
from
NZGBC
For properties where neither of the above options was available,
electricity consumption was estimated using industrial benchmarks
from the New Zealand Green Building Council (NZGBC) for average
kWh/m²/year. Properties were classified as either non-refrigeration
or distribution types, and the corresponding benchmark was applied
based on this classification. Net Lettable Area (NLA), obtained from
internal lease tracking software, was used to calculate the estimated
electricity usage. The relevant emission factor was then applied to
this.
7
15
MEDIUM:
National benchmarks are generally considered reliable,
however, they will not reflect the usage of customers as
accurately as real data.
HIGH:
Due to use of industry benchmarks and assumptions
based on property classification and floor area.
Customer electricity and
gas consumption
Study from
U.S. Energy
Information
Administration
(EIA)
For properties where none of the above options were available,
electricity and gas consumption were estimated using data from a
study by the U.S. Energy Information Administration. Each property
was classified into one of 13 categories aligned with those defined in
the EIA study. Energy intensities were converted from kWh per square
foot to kWh/sqm for electricity, and from thousand Btu per square
foot to kWh/sqm for gas. These intensity estimates were refined,
where appropriate, by our Engineering and Building Services Manager,
who used local knowledge of New
Zealand warehouse operations.
Total
energy consumption was then estimated using floor area data,
with appropriate emission factors applied to calculate emissions.
The
2018 report is the most recent version.
7
15
LOW:
While the estimates are generally considered reliable, in
this case they are based on international building data and
may not reflect the specific characteristics of the actual
buildings. As such, they are less accurate than estimates
derived from site-specific data.
HIGH:
This approach relies on international benchmarks,
adjusted intensity factors, and assumptions regarding
building classification and energy use intensity.
For Scope 3, Category 13 in FY26, 37.6% of electricity data was from submetering, 34.8% was from supplier records,
2.2% was from NZGBC benchmarking and 25.4% was from EIA estimates.
1
GHG quantification is subject to inherent uncertainty due to incomplete scientific knowledge used to determine emissions factors and the values required
to
combine emissions from different gases.
To the Directors of Goodman New Zealand Limited and Goodman Property Services (NZ) Limited
Limited Assurance Report on Goodman’s Scope 1, Scope 2 (location-based), Scope 3
Greenhouse Gas Emissions and the Scope 2 Market-based Disclosures
We have undertaken a limited assurance engagement of the accompanying Scope 1, Scope 2 (location-based), Scope 3
Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions, the additional required disclosures of gross GHG emissions, and gross GHG emissions
methods, assumptions and estimation uncertainty (the GHG Disclosures) and the Scope 2 (calculated using the market-based
method) emissions and related disclosures (together, the Scope 2 Market-based Disclosures) of Goodman New Zealand Limited
(GNZL) and its subsidiaries and Goodman Property Services (NZ) Limited (GPS) (collectively referred to as Goodman NZ) for
the year ended 31 March 2026, as disclosed in the Climate-Related Disclosures report.
Based on the procedures we have performed and the evidence we have obtained, nothing has come to our attention that causes
us to believe that Goodman NZ’s GHG Disclosures and the Scope 2 Market-based Disclosures for the year ended 31 March 2026
are not prepared, in all material respects, in accordance with Management’s Criteria (the Criteria) as explained in the Calculation
Approach on page 66 to the Climate-Related Disclosures report.
We conducted our limited assurance engagement in accordance with International Standard on Assurance Engagements
(New Zealand) 3410 Assurance Engagements on Greenhouse Gas Statements (ISAE (NZ) 3410), issued by the New Zealand
Auditing and Assurance Standards Board. That standard requires that we plan and perform this engagement to obtain limited
assurance about whether the GHG Disclosures and the Scope 2 Market-based Disclosures are free from material misstatement.
We assessed the GHG Disclosures and the Scope 2 Market-based Disclosures against the Criteria. The GHG Disclosures and
the Scope 2 Market-based Disclosures need to be read and understood together with the Criteria. The GHG Disclosures and the
Scope 2 Market-based Disclosures comprise the following metrics and assertions:
—gross GHG emissions
− Scope 1 Direct Emissions of 487.7 tCO
2
e on page 58;
− Scope 2 Purchased Electricity (location-based method) of 166.8 tCO
2
e on page 58; and
− Total Scope 3 emissions of 21,760.0 tCO
2
e on page 58;
—additional required disclosures of gross Scope 1, Scope 2 (location-based method) and Scope 3 GHG emissions on
pages 65 and 66; and
—gross GHG emissions methods, assumptions and estimation uncertainty on pages 67 and 68 to 73.
We have also undertaken a limited assurance engagement over the Scope 2 Market-based Disclosures for the year ended
31 March 2026 as follows:
—Scope 2 Purchased Electricity (market-based method) of 3.8 tCO
2
e on page 58; and
—related disclosures on pages 68 and 69.
Our assurance engagement does not extend to any other information included, or referred to, in the Climate-related Disclosures
report. We have not performed any procedures with respect to the excluded information and, therefore, no conclusion is expressed
on it. The comparative information for the years ended 31 March 2020, 31 March 2024 and 31 March 2025 disclosed in
Goodman NZ’s Climate-related Disclosures report is not covered by the assurance conclusion expressed in this report.
PricewaterhouseCoopers, PwC Tower, 15 Customs Street West, Private Bag 92162, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand
T: +64 9 355 8000, www.pwc.co.nz
7574
Financial Results
Goodman NZ
Annual Report 2026
GNZ Bond Issuer Limited
Annual Report 2026
ContentsYear in ReviewOur BusinessSustainabilityClimate-related DisclosuresOther InformationClimate-related Disclosures
The comparative information (that is, the GHG Disclosures and Scope 2 Market-based Disclosures for the years ended
31 March 2020, 31 March 2024 and 31 March 2025) were previously disclosed in the Climate-related Disclosures report
of Goodman Property Trust for the year ended 31 March 2025 for the purpose of meeting part 7A of the Financial Markets
Conduct Act (2013) (the Act).
We issued an unmodified assurance report in accordance with NZ SAE 1 Assurance Engagements over Greenhouse Gas
Emissions and ISAE (NZ) 3410 dated 23 June 2025 on the GHG Disclosures and Scope 2 Market-based Disclosures for the
year ended 31 March 2025, prepared in accordance with New Zealand Climate Standards and disclosed in the Climate-related
Disclosures report of Goodman Property Trust for the year ended 31 March 2025.
The GHG Disclosures and the Scope 2 Market-based Disclosures for the years ended 31 March 2024 and 31 March 2020
have not been subject to assurance.
There have been no adjustments to the comparative GHG Disclosures and Scope 2 Market-based Disclosures as a result of
Goodman Property Trusts corporatisation into Goodman New Zealand Limited.
We draw attention to the fact that this limited assurance engagement has been undertaken on a voluntary basis at the discretion
of the Directors. Goodman NZ’s Climate-related Disclosures report for the period ended 31 March 2026 is not intended to, and
does not, meet any legislative requirements within Part 7A of the Act. Goodman NZ’s Climate-related Disclosures report has not
been prepared in accordance with Aotearoa New Zealand Climate Standards. Our assurance engagement is therefore intended
solely for the Directors of GNZL and GPS.
The Directors are responsible on behalf of GNZL and GPS for the preparation of the GHG Disclosures and the Scope 2 Market-
based Disclosures in accordance with the Criteria, applied as explained on page 66 of the Climate-Related Disclosures report.
This responsibility includes the design, implementation and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation of the GHG
Disclosures and the Scope 2 Market-based Disclosures that is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
We have complied with the independence and other ethical requirements of Professional and Ethical Standard 1 International
Code of Ethics for Assurance Practitioners (including International Independence Standards) (New Zealand) issued by the
New Zealand Auditing and Assurance Standards Board, which is founded on the fundamental principles of integrity, objectivity,
professional competence and due care, confidentiality and professional behaviour.
We apply Professional and Ethical Standard 3 Quality Management for Firms that Perform Audits or Reviews of Financial
Statements, or Other Assurance or Related Services Engagements, which requires our firm to design, implement and operate
a system of quality management including policies or procedures regarding compliance with ethical requirements, professional
standards and applicable legal and regulatory requirements.
In our capacity as auditor and assurance practitioners, our firm also provides audit, review, agreed-upon procedures and other
assurance services. The firm has no other relationship with, or interests in Goodman NZ.
Our responsibility is to express a limited assurance conclusion on the GHG Disclosures and the Scope 2 Market-based Disclosures
based on the procedures we have performed and the evidence we have obtained. We conducted our limited assurance engagement
in accordance with ISAE (NZ) 3410. That standard requires that we plan and perform this engagement to obtain limited assurance
about whether the GHG Disclosures and the Scope 2 Market-based Disclosures are free from material misstatement.
A limited assurance engagement undertaken in accordance with ISAE (NZ) 3410 involves assessing the suitability in the
circumstances of Goodman NZ’s use of the Criteria as the basis for the preparation of GHG Disclosures and the Scope 2
Market-based Disclosures, assessing the risks of material misstatement of the GHG Disclosures and the Scope 2 Market-based
Disclosures whether due to fraud or error, responding to the assessed risks as necessary in the circumstances, and evaluating
the overall presentation of the GHG Disclosures and the Scope 2 Market-based Disclosures. A limited assurance engagement
is substantially less in scope than a reasonable assurance engagement in relation to both the risk assessment procedures,
including an understanding of internal control, and the procedures performed in response to the assessed risks.
The procedures we performed were based on our professional judgement and included enquiries, observation of processes
performed, inspection of documents, analytical procedures, evaluating the appropriateness of quantification methods and
reporting policies, and agreeing or reconciling with underlying records.
Given the circumstances of the engagement, in performing the procedures listed above we:
—Evaluated Goodman NZ’s assessment of organisational and operational boundaries;
—Obtained, through enquiries, an understanding of Goodman NZ’s control environment, processes and information systems
relevant to the preparation of the GHG Disclosures and the Scope 2 Market-based Disclosures. We did not evaluate the
design of particular control activities, or obtain evidence about their implementation;
—Evaluated whether Goodman NZ’s methods for developing estimates are appropriate and had been consistently applied.
Where we considered it to be appropriate, we tested, on a limited sample basis, the data on which certain estimates are
based. In some instances, we separately developed our own estimates against which to evaluate Goodman NZ’s estimates;
—Assessed a limited number of emission factor sources and reperformed a limited number of emissions calculations for
mathematical accuracy;
—For particular emission sources we confirmed activity data directly with the supplier;
—Reconciled data used in the calculation of certain emission sources to other records with Goodman NZ;
—Tested a limited number of items to, or from, supporting records, as appropriate;
—Performed analytical procedures on particular emission categories by comparing expected spend or activity data to actual
data used in the calculation of GHGs emitted and made enquiries of management to obtain explanations for any significant
differences we identified; and
—Considered the presentation and disclosure of the GHG Disclosures and the Scope 2 Market-based Disclosures.
The procedures performed in a limited assurance engagement vary in nature and timing from, and are less in extent than for,
a reasonable assurance engagement. Consequently, the level of assurance obtained in a limited assurance engagement is
substantially lower than the assurance that would have been obtained had we performed a reasonable assurance engagement.
Accordingly, we do not express a reasonable assurance opinion about whether Goodman NZ’s GHG Disclosures and the Scope 2
Market-based Disclosures have been prepared, in all material respects, in accordance with the Criteria applied as explained on
page 66 of the Climate-Related Disclosures report.
Because of the inherent limitations of an assurance engagement, together with the internal control structure, it is possible that
fraud, error or non-compliance may occur and not be detected.
As discussed on pages 69-73 of the Climate-Related Disclosures report, the GHG quantification is subject to inherent uncertainty
because of incomplete scientific knowledge used to determine emissions factors and the values needed to combine emissions of
different gases.
This report, including our conclusions, has been prepared solely for the Directors of GNZL and GPS.
Our report should not be used for any other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, we do not accept or assume
responsibility for any reliance on this report to anyone other than the Directors of GNZL and GPS, as a body, or for any purpose
other than that for which it was prepared.
For and on behalf of:
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Auckland
25 June 2026
PwCPwC
7776
Financial Results
Goodman NZ
Annual Report 2026
GNZ Bond Issuer Limited
Annual Report 2026
ContentsYear in ReviewOur BusinessSustainabilityClimate-related DisclosuresOther InformationClimate-related Disclosures
Independent Assurance Report (continued)
7978
Bosch
Highbrook Crossing Units, Highbrook Business Park
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
GOODMAN NZ
Financial Statements
For the year ended 31 March 2026
The Boards of Goodman New Zealand Limited and
Goodman Property Services (NZ) Limited authorised
these financial statements for issue on 25 May 2026.
For and on behalf of the Boards:
John Dakin
L
aurissa Cooney
Chair Chair, Audit and Risk Committee
Financial Results
Goodman NZ
Annual Report 2026
ContentsYear in ReviewOur BusinessSustainabilityClimate-related DisclosuresOther Information
Statement of comprehensive income 80
Balance sheet
81
S
tatement of cash flows
82
S
tatement of changes in equity
83
G
eneral information
84
N
otes to the financial statements
87
1
.
I
nvestment property
8
7
2.
I
nvestment in associates
9
2
3. Borrowings
9
4
4.
C
ontributed equity and distributions
9
9
5.
O
perating earnings and earnings per share
1
00
6.
T
ransaction costs
1
01
7.
F
inancial instruments
1
02
8.
N
et corporate costs
1
03
9.
E
mployee benefits liabilities
1
04
10.
Re
lated party assets
1
06
11.
E
mployee compensation reserve
1
07
12.
D
ebtors and other assets
1
09
13.
C
reditors and other liabilities
1
09
14. Tax
1
10
15.
Re
lated party disclosures
1
12
16.
C
ommitments and contingencies
1
15
17.
Re
conciliation of profit after tax
to net cash flows from operating activities
1
15
18.
F
inancial risk management
1
16
19.
M
ajor customer disclosure
1
18
20.
O
perating segments
1
18
Independent auditor’s report
1
21
STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
For the year ended 31 March 2026
$ millionNote20262025
Property income1.1223.12 7 7. 9
Property expenses(38.6)( 4 7. 4 )
Net property income184.5230.5
Fee income
1510.8–
Interest cost
3.1(48.3)(64.9)
Interest income
3.18.50.8
Net interest cost(39.8)(6 4.1)
Net corporate costs
8(13.8)(10.9)
Share based payments expense
11(4.2)(1.2)
Profit before other expenses and tax137.5154.3
Other income / (expenses)
Share of earnings from associates
28 4 .7–
Movement in fair value of investment property
1.35 9 .711.1
Movement in fair value of financial instruments
7. 1( 7. 0 )( 17. 1 )
Movement in fair value of legacy employee benefits
9(10.3)( 1 3 .7 )
Transitional services(1.1)(1.1)
Transaction costs
6(5.1)(2.6)
Profit before tax258.4130.9
Tax expense
14.1(10.4)(21.3)
Profit after tax attributable to equity holders248.0109.6
Other comprehensive income––
Total comprehensive income for the year attributable to equity holders248.0109.6
For 2026, total comprehensive income for the year is attributable to equity holders of Goodman New Zealand Limited
only, with no comprehensive income attributable to equity holders of Goodman Property Services (NZ) Limited.
Refer
to note 20 for further details.
For 2025, total comprehensive income for the year was attributable to equity holders of Goodman Property Trust.
CentsNote20262025
Basic and diluted earnings per share after tax
5.2
16.127. 1 2
For 2026, basic and diluted earnings per share after tax is attributable to equity holders of Goodman New Zealand
Limited only, with no basic and diluted earnings per share after tax attributable to equity holders of Goodman
Property Services (NZ) Limited.
For 2025, basic and diluted earnings per share after tax was attributable to equity holders of Goodman Property
Trust on a per unit basis.
The above statement should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.
BALANCE SHEET
As at 31 March 2026
$ millionNote20262025
Non-current assets
Investment property
1.3
2,671.52,524.0
Investment in associates
2.3
974 . 9–
Financial instruments
7. 2
5.45.1
Property, plant and equipment11.11.1
Tax receivable7. 06.9
Deferred tax assets
14.2
8.310.6
Related party assets
10
23.44 0.5
Total non-current assets3,701 .62,588.2
Investment properties held for sale
1.5
–2,165.1
Current assets
Cash10.58.2
Short-term deposits475.0–
Financial instruments
7. 2
–0.2
Debtors and other assets
12
17. 26 .7
Tax receivable–0.9
Related party assets
10
17. 116.1
Total current assets519.832.1
Total assets4,221.44 ,78 5. 4
Non-current liabilities
Borrowings
3.2
70 4.01,132.8
Lease liabilities
3.5
185.2126.0
Financial instruments
7. 2
–14.3
Creditors and other liabilities
13
2 .7–
Deferred tax liabilities
14.2
9.9–
Employee benefits liabilities
9
11.317. 8
Total non-current liabilities913.11,290.9
Current liabilities
Borrowings
3.2
–325.0
Creditors and other liabilities
13
35.138.9
Current tax payable–1.8
Lease liabilities
3.5
9.40 .7
Employee benefits liabilities
9
20.217. 1
Total current liabilities6 4 .7383.5
Total liabilities9 7 7. 81 ,6 74 . 4
Net assets3,243.63,111.0
Equity
Contributed equity
4
1,939.11,955.0
Retained earnings1,299.11,15 4.8
Employee compensation reserve
11
5.41.2
To t a l e q u i t y
20
3,243.63,111.0
GNZ equity3 , 2 3 7. 03,111.0
GPS equity
4.2
6.6–
To t a l e q u i t y3,243.63,111.0
The above statement should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.
8180
Financial Statements of
Goodman NZ
Financial Results
Goodman NZ
Annual Report 2026
ContentsYear in ReviewOur BusinessSustainabilityClimate-related DisclosuresOther Information
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
For the year ended 31 March 2026
$ millionNote20262025
Cash flows from operating activities
Property income received223.1275.9
Property expenses paid(37.1)(48.4)
Fee income10.8–
Interest income received8.50.8
Interest costs paid on borrowings(46.5)(56.3)
Interest costs paid on lease liabilities(4.9)(4.5)
Corporate costs paid(10.1)( 7. 6 )
Net GST (paid) / received( 1 .7 )2.3
Tax refund received0.81.4
Transaction costs paid(6.4)(2.3)
Payments for the acquisition of other assets( 2 .7 )–
Net cash flows from operating activities
17133.8161.3
Cash flows from investing activities
Proceeds from the sale of investment properties1,297.51.4
Capital expenditure payments for investment properties(56.5)(80.1)
Payments for property, plant and equipment(3.1)–
Holding costs capitalised to investment properties(8.1)(9.2)
Dividends from associates9 .7–
Investments in short-term deposits(475.0)–
Net cash flows from investing activities764.5(87.9)
Cash flows from financing activities
Proceeds from borrowings385.09 17. 0
Repayments of borrowings(1,14 0.0)( 8 7 7.7 )
Settlement of financial instruments(21.4)(15.0)
Distributions paid
4( 1 0 3 .7 )(98.9)
Equity buyback and cancellation
4(15.9)–
Net cash flows from financing activities(896.0)( 74 .6)
Net movement in cash2.3(1.2)
Cash at the beginning of the year8.29.4
Cash at the end of the year10.58.2
The above statement should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.
The sale of Highbrook Business Park for $2,109.7 million and the concurrent investment in associate of $899.9 million
were settled on a net basis, with $1,209.8 million of cash received which is included in proceeds from the sale of
investment properties above.
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
For the year ended 31 March 2026
Note
Contributed
equity
($ million)
Employee
compensation
reserve
($ million)
Retained
earnings
($ million)
To t a l
equity
($ million)
As at 1 April 20241,955.0–1,14 4.13,099.1
Total comprehensive income for the year––109.6109.6
Distributions paid
4––(98.9)(98.9)
Share based payment expense
11–1.2–1.2
As at 31 March 20251,955.01.21,154.83,111.0
Total comprehensive income for the year––248.0248.0
Distributions paid
4––( 1 0 3 .7 )(10 3 .7 )
Share based payment expense
11–4.2–4.2
Equity buyback and cancellation
4(15.9)––(15.9)
As at 31 March 20261,939.15.41,299.13,243.6
The above statement should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.
8382
Financial Statements of
Goodman NZ
Financial Results
Goodman NZ
Annual Report 2026
ContentsYear in ReviewOur BusinessSustainabilityClimate-related DisclosuresOther Information
GENERAL INFORMATION
For the year ended 31 March 2026
Reporting entity
Goodman New Zealand Limited (GNZL or the Company)
is a company incorporated on 18 February 2026 and
domiciled in New
Zealand. GNZL was established as part
of the corporatisation of Goodman Property Trust (GMT
or the Trust) which was implemented following unitholder
approval of the corporatisation and stapling transaction
on 31 March 2026. Refer to the significant transactions
section on the following page for further details.
Goodman Property Services (NZ) Limited (GPS) is
a company incorporated on 28 March 2003 and
domiciled in New
Zealand.
The address of the registered office for both entities is
Level 8, 124 Halsey Street, Auckland.
The financial statements presented are consolidated
financial statements of Goodman New
Zealand Limited
and its wholly-owned subsidiaries and Goodman
Property Services (NZ) Limited, each of GNZL and GPS
being a “stapled entity”, and together Goodman NZ
(GNZ
or the Group).
The stapling transaction results in the combination
of GNZL and GPS into a consolidated group. For the
purposes of financial reporting, one of the stapled
entities is required to be identified as the parent entity
of the consolidated group. GNZL has been identified as
the parent for the purposes of preparing these financial
statements and, consequently, the equity interest
attributable to GPS is presented as a non
-controlling
interest in the consolidated financial statements.
GNZ holds an investment in the Goodman NZ Highbrook
Limited Partnership (HLP) and GNZ Highbrook General
Partner Limited, which are both accounted for as
associates using the equity method of accounting.
The Group is an FMC reporting entity for the purposes
of the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013 (FMCA)
and the Financial Reporting Act 2013 and is an Equity
Security for the purposes of the New
Zealand Stock
Exchange (NZX) Main Board Listing Rules. Shares of
GNZL and GPS are stapled (on a one for one basis) and
therefore cannot be traded separately and can only be
traded as stapled securities. They are quoted on the
Main Board equity securities market of NZX under the
ticker code GNZ.
GNZL’s principal activity is to invest in real estate in
New
Zealand and GPS’s principal activity involves the
management of real estate investments in New
Zealand.
Basis of preparation and measurement
The financial statements of the Group have been
prepared in accordance with the Financial Markets
Conduct (Financial Reporting -Goodman New
Zealand
Group) Exemption Notice 2026, issued by the Financial
Markets Authority on 18 February 2026, and waivers
granted to the Group by the NZX on 7 April 2026
in connection with the corporatisation and stapling
transaction. These regulatory exemptions and waivers
permit the preparation and publication of consolidated
financial statements for the stapled group. The
exemptions and waivers remain subject to ongoing
conditions, including the requirement that GNZL and
GPS remain stapled.
The financial statements have been prepared in
accordance with New
Zealand Generally Accepted
Accounting Practice (NZ GAAP), comply with
New Zealand Equivalents to International Financial
Reporting Standards (NZ IFRS), other New
Zealand
accounting standards and authoritative notices that are
applicable to entities that apply NZ IFRS. The Group is
a for-profit tier one entity for the purposes of complying
with NZ GAAP. The financial statements comply with
International Financial Reporting Standards Accounting
Standards (IFRS Accounting Standards).
The financial statements have been prepared on the
historical cost basis except for assets and liabilities
stated at fair value as disclosed.
As the corporatisation and stapling transaction has
been treated as an internal reorganisation, the financial
statements for the current reporting period reflect a
full year of operations of GNZ (including the results of
GMT and its subsidiaries up to the transaction date).
Comparative information presented is the financial
statements of GMT and its subsidiaries for the year
ended 31 March 2025.
The financial statements are in New
Zealand dollars,
the
Group’s functional currency.
Basis of consolidation
The financial statements have eliminated in full all
intercompany transactions, intercompany balances and
gains or losses on transactions between Group entities.
Significant estimates and judgements
Management is required to make judgements, estimates,
and apply assumptions that affect the amounts reported
in the financial statements. These have been based on
historical experience and other factors Management
believes to be reasonable. Actual results may differ from
these estimates and the difference may be material.
Estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on
an ongoing basis. Revisions to accounting estimates are
recognised in the period in which the estimate is revised
and in the future periods affected.
The significant judgements made in the preparation of
these financial statements are detailed in the following
notes:
+Investment property (note 1.4)
+I
nvestment in associates (note 2)
+E
mployee benefits liabilities (note 9)
+Corporatisation and stapling (Significant
transactions page 86)
Material accounting policies
Shares are classified as equity. If new shares are issued
in the year, any external costs directly attributable to the
issue are deducted from the proceeds received.
Distributions are recognised in equity in the period in
which they are paid.
Other material accounting policies are disclosed in the
relevant notes.
C
hanges in accounting policy
The accounting policies and methods of computation
used in the preparation of these financial statements are
consistent with those used in the financial statements for
the year ended 31 March 2025.
New accounting policies
Short-t
erm deposits are financial assets recognised
initially at fair value and subsequently measured at
amortised cost using the effective interest method.
Short
-t
erm deposits comprise deposits with banks
that originally had maturities longer than three months.
Interest income is recognised in profit or loss as it
accrues using the effective interest method.
New accounting standards now adopted
There have been no new accounting standards that are
applicable to these financial statements.
Standards issued but not yet effective
The new and amended standards and interpretations
that are issued, but not yet effective, up to the date
of issuance of the Group’s financial statements are
disclosed below. The Group intends to adopt these
new and amended standards and interpretations, if
applicable, when they become effective.
NZ IFRS 18 Presentation and Disclosure
in
Financial Statements
This standard becomes effective for reporting periods
beginning on or after 1 January 2027. NZ IFRS 18
introduces new requirements on presentation within
the statement of comprehensive income, including
specified totals and subtotals. It also requires disclosure
of management-defined performance measures and
includes new requirements for the aggregation and
disaggregation of financial information based on the
identified ‘roles’ of the primary financial statements and
the notes. The Group is currently assessing the potential
impact of this standard.
Significant transactions
Sale of Highbrook Business Park to Goodman NZ
Highbrook Limited Partnership
On 30 September 2025, the Goodman NZ Highbrook
Limited Partnership was established between GNZ,
Goodman Group (a related party, see note 15) and
Mercer to co-invest in Highbrook Business Park. GNZ
acquired a 71.1% interest in HLP, with Goodman Group
and Mercer acquiring 15.8% and 13.1% respectively.
As
part of the establishment of HLP, GNZ sold Highbrook
Business Park to HLP for $2.1 billion in exchange for
$1.2 billion of cash and a non-cash investment in HLP
of
$0.9 billion.
HLP is managed by GPS under a long-term management
agreement. GPS provides investment, property
management and other services to HLP under agreed
fee structures.
8584
Financial Statements of
Goodman NZ
Financial Results
Goodman NZ
Annual Report 2026
ContentsYear in ReviewOur BusinessSustainabilityClimate-related DisclosuresOther Information
General information (continued)
Corporatisation and stapling
On 31 March 2026, unitholders approved the
corporatisation of GMT which, in effect, became GNZL,
and the stapling of shares in GNZL and GPS. The
transaction resulted in GMT unitholders exchanging each
unit in GMT that they held for one ordinary share in each
of GNZL and GPS which have been permanently stapled
and may only be traded together as a single security.
The transaction represents an internal reorganisation
of entities under common control as GMT controlled
both GNZL and GPS immediately before and after the
reorganisation, with their shares held for the benefit
of GMT unitholders until the stapled securities were
distributed. The transaction has therefore not been
accounted for as a business combination, with the assets
and liabilities of the Group recognised at their existing
carrying values immediately prior to the transaction.
GNZL has been determined to be the parent entity as
the holder of the Group’s substantive property ownership
activities, reflecting the continuation of the existing
reporting entity following the reorganisation.
GNZL is the Group’s portfolio investment entity (PIE) and
holds the Group’s property investment activities. GPS is a
non
-PIE entity and undertakes the Group’s management
of real estate investment activities.
Unitholders approved the corporatisation and stapling
transaction on 31 March 2026 (at a special meeting
of unitholders) and the financial statements have been
prepared on that basis. The transaction date has been
determined as 31 March 2026, being the date on
which all substantive conditions were satisfied and the
transaction became legally binding on all parties. Legal
completion of the transaction, including the cancellation
of trust units, stapling of GNZL and GPS shares, the
transfer of stapled securities to equity holders and
quotation of the stapled securities on the NZX occurred
after balance date on 7 April 2026. Following the
distribution of its assets by GMT on 7
April 2026, the
Trust ceased to exist at law. GMT remains a registered
Managed Investment Scheme under FMCA and is
expected to be deregistered within six months of the date
of distribution of the assets of the
Trust.
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the year ended 31 March 2026
1. Investment property
1.1 Property income
Property income is earned from investment property leased to customers.
$ million20262025
Gross lease receipts1 9 6 .724 4.0
Service charge income29.63 7. 5
Straight-line rental adjustments3.05.0
Amortisation of capitalised lease incentives(6.2)(8.6)
Property income223.12 7 7. 9
Property income from investment property leased to customers under operating leases is recognised on a straight-line
basis over the term of the lease to the extent that future rental increases are known with certainty. Straight-line rental
adjustments are accounted for to achieve straight-line income recognition. Where lease incentives are provided to
customers, the cost of incentives is amortised over the lease term on a straight-line basis as a reduction to rental income.
Service charge income is recognised for the recoverable portion of customers’ property operating expenses incurred in
the year.
1.2 Future contracted gross lease receipts
Gross lease receipts that the Group has contracted to receive in future years are set out below. These leases cannot
be cancelled by the customer.
$ million20262025
Ye a r 11 3 2 .72 3 7. 4
Ye a r 2125.4214.4
Ye a r 3112.1191.2
Ye a r 49 7. 2162.0
Ye a r 586.514 0.4
Year 6 and later358.9599.9
Total future contracted gross lease receipts912.81,545.3
The disposal of the Highbrook Business Park to HLP during the year resulted in a $470.5 million reduction in gross
future contracted gross lease receipts as at 31 March 2026.
8786
Financial Statements of
Goodman NZ
Financial Results
Goodman NZ
Annual Report 2026
ContentsYear in ReviewOur BusinessSustainabilityClimate-related DisclosuresOther Information
1. Investment property (continued)
1.3 Investment property
The Group’s investment property is classified as follows.
CoreThose estates within the portfolio which largely consist of modern, high-quality
logistics and industrial properties.
Value-addThose estates which generally consist of older properties that are likely to have
redevelopment potential. Redevelopment of the properties to realise their maximum
future value may require a change in use.
Investment property
under development (IPUD)
Developments under construction and land held for future development, either held at
fair value or held at cost.
Movements in the year for each category is detailed in the following table.
$ millionCoreValue-addStabilisedIPUDTo t a l
Carrying value 31 March 20243,669.8604.44,274.22 5 9 .74,533.9
Transfers in214.8–214.8–214.8
Right of use asset changes
for lease modifications62.3–62.3–62.3
Net expenditure26.98.935.846.081.8
Fair value movement(2.1)0.5(1.6)0.4(1.2)
Transfers out–––(214.8)(214.8)
Transferred to assets held for sale(2,152.8)(2,152.8)–(2,152.8)
Carrying value 31 March 20251,818.9613.82 , 4 3 2 .791.32,524.0
Transfers in3.1–3.145.448.5
Right of use asset changes
for lease modifications54.2–54.2–54.2
Net expenditure10.15.015.118.533.6
Fair value movement60.52.362.8(3.1)5 9.7
Transfers out–(45.4)(45.4)(3.1)(48.5)
Carrying value 31 March 20261,946.8575.72,522.5149.02,671.5
Valuation firms used for property valuations in the current year are Colliers, JLL, CBRE & Bayleys. In the prior year
valuation firms used for property valuations were Colliers, JLL, Savills, Bayleys & CBRE.
Included within stabilised properties is a gross-up equivalent to lease liabilities of $186.6 million (2025:
$125.8
million).
Included within investment property under development is $10.1 million of land held at fair value (2025:
$13.3
million), $71.0 million of developments under construction recorded at fair value (2025: $78.0 million),
and
$67.9 million of developments under construction recorded at cost (2025: nil).
1. Investment property (continued)
1.4 Valuation of investment property
The carrying value of stabilised properties, substantially completed developments and land is the fair value of the
property as determined by an expert independent valuer, from a panel of valuation companies comprising Bayleys
Valuations Limited, CBRE Limited, Colliers International New Zealand Limited, Jones Lang LaSalle Limited & Savills
(NZ) Limited, who are all members of the New Zealand Institute of Valuers.
Fair value reflects the Board’s assessment of highest and best use of each property at the end of the reporting period.
If the Board’s view of highest and best use has changed any impact on value will be assessed by independent valuations.
Management reviews the valuations performed by the independent valuers for financial reporting purposes. Discussions
of valuation processes and results are held between various combinations of the Board, the Chief Executive Officer, the
Chief Financial Officer, the Valuation Committee, and the independent valuers at least twice every year in line with the
Group’s reporting dates. Full independent valuations are completed for stabilised properties, developments held at fair
value and land at least annually. Developments where fair value is not able to be reliably determined are carried at cost
less any impairment. Additionally, at each financial year end all major inputs to the independent valuation reports are
verified and an assessment undertaken of all property valuation movements by management.
The fair values presented are based on market values, being the estimated amount for which a property could be
exchanged on the date of valuation between a willing buyer and a willing seller in an arm’s length transaction after
proper marketing wherein the parties had each acted knowledgeably, prudently and without compulsion. If this
information is not available, alternative valuation methods are used, such as; recent prices on less active markets;
the capitalisation method, which determines fair value by capitalising a property’s sustainable net income at a
market derived capitalisation rate with capital adjustments made where appropriate; or discounted cash flow
projections (DCF), which discount estimates of future cash flows by an appropriate discount rate to derive the fair
value. The key assumptions used in the valuations are derived from recent comparable transactions to the greatest
extent possible; however, all three of the valuation methods rely upon unobservable inputs in determining fair value for
all investment property.
Valuations also reflect the following unobservable inputs, where appropriate: the quality of customers in occupation
or responsible for meeting lease commitments or likely to be in occupation after letting vacant accommodation, and
the market’s general perception of their creditworthiness; the allocation of maintenance and insurance responsibilities
between the Group and the customer; and the remaining economic life of the property. When rent reviews or lease
renewals are pending with anticipated reversionary increases, it is assumed that all notices and where appropriate
counter-notices have been served validly and within the appropriate time.
The Group has considered the impact of climate change on the business and the valuation of investment property.
To date, the panel of independent valuers used have made no explicit adjustments to valuations in respect of climate
change matters. The Group acknowledges that climate change considerations will likely have a greater influence on
valuations in the future as markets place a greater emphasis on these matters. All investment property is categorised
as level 3 in the fair value hierarchy. Refer to note 18.6 for details of the fair value hierarchy (applicable to all items
measured at fair value) and the Group’s transfer policy. During the year, there were no transfers of properties between
levels of the fair value hierarchy.
8988
Financial Statements of
Goodman NZ
Notes to the Financial Statements (continued)
Financial Results
Goodman NZ
Annual Report 2026
ContentsYear in ReviewOur BusinessSustainabilityClimate-related DisclosuresOther Information
1. Investment property (continued)
1.4 Valuation of investment property (continued)
The key valuation inputs used to measure fair value of investment property are disclosed below, along with the
weighted average value for each input:
Weighted average valuation
input value
Measurement
sensitivity
Key valuation inputDescription20262025
Increase
in the input
Decrease
in the input
Market
capitalisation rate
The capitalisation rate applied to the
market rental to assess a property’s value.
Derived from similar transactional evidence
considering location, weighted average lease
term, customer covenant, size and quality
of the property. Used in the capitalisation
method.
6.0%6.0%DecreaseIncrease
Market rentalThe valuer’s assessment of the annual net
market income per square metre (psm)
attributable to the property; includes both
leased and vacant areas. Used in both the
capitalisation method and the DCF method.
$193 psm$186 psmIncreaseDecrease
Discount rateThe rate applied to future cash flows; it
reflects transactional evidence from similar
types of property assets. Used in the DCF
method.
8 .1%8.0%DecreaseIncrease
Rental growth rateThe rate applied to the market rental over
the 10-year cash flow projection. Used in the
DCF method.
2.8% p . a .2.8% p . a .IncreaseDecrease
Terminal
capitalisation rate
The rate used to assess the terminal value of
the property. Used in the DCF method.
6.3%6.2%DecreaseIncrease
The market capitalisation rate is the main determinant of value in the valuation of investment property. The impact
of a 0.5% increase in the market capitalisation rate from 6.0% to 6.5%, assuming all other valuation inputs remain
unchanged, would be equivalent to a decrease of $194.0 million / 7.7% in the fair value of investment property.
For the comparative 2025 year, the impact of a 0.5% increase in the market capitalisation rate from 6.0% to 6.5%,
assuming all other valuation inputs remain unchanged, was equivalent to a decrease of $187.1 million / 7.7% in the fair
value of investment property. This impact excludes investment properties held for sale in the prior year.
Land is valued based on recent comparable transactions, resulting in land values ranging between $184 psm and
$201 psm (2025: between $184 psm and $650 psm).
1. Investment property (continued)
1.4 Valuation of investment property (continued)
Stabilised properties are investment properties which are held to earn rental income. They are recorded initially at cost,
including related transaction costs. After initial recognition, stabilised properties are carried at fair value. A panel of
expert independent valuers value the portfolio at least once each year, generally at 31 March. Fair values are based on
estimated market values. If this information is not available, alternative valuation methods such as recent prices in less
active markets, the capitalisation method, or discounted cash flow projections are used.
Stabilised property that is being redeveloped is carried at fair value and holding costs are capitalised to the property
during redevelopment. Expenditure is capitalised to a property when it is probable that it will provide future economic
benefits to the Group. All other repairs and maintenance costs are charged to the statement of comprehensive income.
Any gain or loss arising from a change in fair value is recognised in the statement of comprehensive income.
When sold, the net gain or loss on disposal of stabilised property is included in the statement of comprehensive income
in the period in which the sale occurred. The gain or loss on disposal is calculated as the difference between the carrying
amount of the stabilised property on the balance sheet and the proceeds from sale net of any costs associated with
the sale.
For leases where the Group is a lessee, the Group recognises a right of use asset at the commencement date of the
lease, being the date that the underlying asset is available for use. Investment property is defined to include both owned
investment property and investment property held by a lessee as a right of use asset. The Group therefore measures all
investment property using the same measurement basis, being the fair value model. The value of the right of use assets
represents the fair value of a freehold interest in the land subject to ground lease interests held by the Group. Investment
property is adjusted for cash flows relating to lease liabilities already recognised separately on the balance sheet and
also reflected in the investment property valuations.
Investment property under development includes properties that are being constructed for future use as stabilised
property and land to be developed as stabilised property in the future. On acquisition, investment property under
development is recorded at cost, including related transaction costs. Stabilised property to be redeveloped is
transferred at the carrying value prior to transfer. All subsequent costs and capital expenditure directly associated
with investment property under development is capitalised.
Holding costs are capitalised if they are directly attributable to the development of a property. The most significant
component of holding costs is borrowing costs. Capitalisation of borrowing costs commences when the activities to
prepare the property for its intended use are in progress and expenditure and borrowing costs are being incurred.
The amount capitalised is determined by applying the weighted average cost of debt to borrowings attributed to the
investment property under development. Capitalisation of borrowing costs continues until the development of the
property is completed.
Employees costs are capitalised if they are directly attributable to the development of a property.
If the fair value of a development can be reliably determined during the course of its construction, then the development
will be recorded at fair value (adjusted for percentage of completion) in the same manner as stabilised properties.
Commenced developments held at the land transfer value plus subsequent capital expenditure are tested for
impairment. An indication of impairment requires an assessment of the recoverable amount of the commenced
development, with the full value of any applicable impairment immediately recognised.
Land is carried at fair value, independently valued at least annually, with any changes in valuation recognised in the
statement of comprehensive income.
9190
Financial Statements of
Goodman NZ
Notes to the Financial Statements (continued)
Financial Results
Goodman NZ
Annual Report 2026
ContentsYear in ReviewOur BusinessSustainabilityClimate-related DisclosuresOther Information
1. Investment property (continued)
1.5 Investment properties held for sale
Investment properties held for sale in the prior year comprised investment properties actively marketed for sale that
were subsequently contracted for sale. These properties settled in the current financial year.
$ million20262025
Carrying value at start of year2,165.1–
Transfers in–2,152.8
Fair value movement–12.3
Disposals(2,165.1)–
Carrying value at end of year–2,165.1
Investment property is classified as held for sale if the property or group of properties is available for immediate sale in
its present condition subject only to terms that are usual and customary for sales of such assets and it is highly likely to
be sold within one year.
The carrying value of the property is the proposed sale price or the most recent valuation if the investment property is
not contracted for sale. Where the carrying value is the proposed sale price, the carrying value is adjusted for specific
provisions made within the proposed sale agreement. Investment properties held for sale continue to be measured at
fair value with assessment made as to whether the agreed selling price reflects fair value.
In July 2726, the Group settled the disposal of a core property in Albany, Auckland for 159.7 million.
On 87 September 2726, the Group settled the disposal of Highbrook Business Park, Auckland for 12.4 billion.
2. Investment in associates
GNZL has investments in two associate entities, being Goodman NZ Highbrook Limited Partnership (HLP) and GNZ
Highbrook General Partner Limited (HGP), the general partner of HLP. Both entities have the same ownership, with
GNZL owning 71.1%, Goodman Group owning 15.8% and Mercer owning 13.1%.
HLP is domiciled in New
Zealand, holds a portfolio of industrial real estate and is managed by GPS.
HGP is domiciled in New Zealand and acts as the general partner for HLP, with GPS providing management services.
2. Investment in associates (continued)
Financials of HLP are detailed as follows representing 100% of HLP values. HGP has no assets or liabilities with no
profit for the period.
2.1 HLP statement of comprehensive income
$ million
HLP
2026
Net property income5 7. 4
Net interest cost( 17. 5 )
Corporate costs(5.0)
Operating income34.9
Movement in fair value of investment property72.3
Movement in fair value of financial instruments15.5
Other income8 7. 8
Net profit1 2 2 .7
2.2 HLP balance sheet
$ million
HLP
2026
Stabilised properties2 , 1 8 9 .7
Financial instruments 17. 2
Current assets4.8
Total assets2 , 211 .7
Borrowings (non-current)822.8
Current liabilities14.9
Total liabilities8 3 7.7
Net assets1 , 3 74 . 0
2.3 Investment in HLP associate
$ million
GNZ share
2026
GNZ ownership %71.15%
Investments899.9
HLP net profit8 7. 3
Elimination of unrealised fee recognition(2.6)
Dividends received( 9 .7 )
Investment in HLP associate9 74 . 9
9392
Financial Statements of
Goodman NZ
Notes to the Financial Statements (continued)
Financial Results
Goodman NZ
Annual Report 2026
ContentsYear in ReviewOur BusinessSustainabilityClimate-related DisclosuresOther Information
2. Investment in associate (continued)
2.3 Investment in HLP associate (continued)
The terms of the Limited Partnership agreement for HLP ensure that control does not exist as the Group does not
have unilateral power to direct HLP’s key activities. Key decisions are subject to investor approval thresholds, including
‘Fundamental Matters’ requiring 90% approval and ‘Majority Plus Matters’ requiring approval from more than one
investor. Accordingly, the Group has concluded it has significant influence but not control of HLP, and similarly HGP,
and therefore accounts for its investments using the equity method.
An associate is an entity over which the Group has significant influence, but neither control nor joint control, over the
financial and operating policies of the entity.
Investments in associates are accounted for using the equity method. Under the equity method, the investment is
initially recognised at cost, including any directly attributable transaction costs. After initial recognition, the carrying
amount of the investment is adjusted to recognise the Group’s share of the associate’s profit or loss and other
comprehensive income, which is recognised in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income, respectively. No
income tax expense is recognised at the associate level for HLP and the Group accounts for its share of income tax in
its own income tax expense. Unrealised profits and losses on transactions between the Group and its associates are
eliminated to the extent of the Group’s interest.
The Group’s investment in HLP is subject to restrictions on the transfer of funds to the Group. These arise from HLP’s
financing arrangements, including bank covenants that, if not met, may restrict or prevent distributions to investors.
Accordingly, the Group’s ability to access cash flows from the associate is dependent on HLP maintaining compliance
with these covenants. These restrictions did not impact any distributions made by HLP during the year.
3. Borrowings
3.1
I
nterest
$ million20262025
Interest expense on borrowings(41.6)( 6 2 .7 )
Interest expense on lease liabilities(10.0)( 4 .7 )
Amortisation of borrowing costs(3.0)( 6 .7 )
Borrowing costs capitalised
(1)
6.39.2
Total interest cost(48.3)(64.9)
Interest income8.50.8
Net interest cost(39.8)(64.1)
(1)
Borrowing costs are capitalised at the weighted average cost of borrowing of 4.2% (2025: 4.8%). Borrowing costs of $0.5 million were capitalised to
land (2025: $0.7 million).
Interest costs charged on borrowings are recognised as incurred. Costs associated with the establishment of
borrowings are amortised over the term of the relevant borrowings.
3. Borrowings (continued)
3.2 Borrowings
$ million20262025
Current
Syndicated bank facilities–325.0
Total current borrowings–325.0
Non-current
Syndicated bank facilities5.0285.0
Bilateral bank facilities–150.0
Green retail bonds150.0150.0
Wholesale bonds4 00.04 00.0
Wholesale green bonds150.0150.0
Total non-current705.01,135.0
Unamortised borrowings establishment costs(1.0)(2.2)
Total non-current borrowings704.01,132.8
Total borrowings704.01 , 4 5 7. 8
Borrowings are recorded initially at fair value, net of debt establishment transaction costs. Subsequent to initial
recognition, borrowings are carried at amortised cost using the effective interest method.
Syndicated bank facilities drawn are considered non-current due to adequate undrawn capacity in the longer dated
tranches, allowing these to be utilised to fund the amount drawn from short term tranches.
In June 2726, a 1567 million green bilateral bank facility was cancelled, which had an expiry date of 95 December 2726.
In July 2726, a 15.6 million bilateral bank facility was cancelled, which had an expiry date of 95 March 2728.
On 97 September 2726, following the settlement of the Highbrook transaction, all syndicated bank facilities
(1647 million) and the remaining green bilateral bank facility (1567 million) were cancelled.
On 97 September 2726, 1577 million of new syndicated bank facilities, expiring in September 272., were provided
by Bank of New Zealand and Westpac New Zealand Limited.
9594
Financial Statements of
Goodman NZ
Notes to the Financial Statements (continued)
Financial Results
Goodman NZ
Annual Report 2026
ContentsYear in ReviewOur BusinessSustainabilityClimate-related DisclosuresOther Information
3. Borrowings (continued)
3.3 Composition of borrowings
Weighted
average
remaining
term (years)
$ million
2026
Date
issuedExpiry
Interest
rate
Drawn
amount
Undrawn
facility
Syndicated bank facilities–S e p 271.5Floating5.095.0
Green retail bonds – GMB060Apr 22A p r 271.04 .74 0 %150.0–
Wholesale bonds – 6 yearsDec 21Dec 271 .73.656%200.0–
Wholesale bonds – 8 yearsSep 20Sep 282.42.262%50.0–
Wholesale bonds – 10 yearsSep 20Sep 304.42.559%150.0–
Green wholesale bonds – 5 yearsO c t 24Oct 293.55.012%150.0–
Weighted
average
remaining
term (years)
$ million
2025
Date
issuedExpiry
Interest
rate
Drawn
amount
Undrawn
facility
Syndicated bank facilities–Jun 26 – Jun 282.1Floating285.0305.0
Green bank facility – Bank of New Zealand–Dec 250 .7Floating150.0–
Bank facility
– Commonwealth Bank of Australia–Mar 261.0Floating17 5 . 0–
Green bank facility
– Westpac New
Zealand Limited–Dec 261 .7Floating150.0–
Bank facility – Bank of New Zealand–Jun 294.3Floating–10 0.0
Green retail bonds – GMB060Apr 22A p r 272.04 .74 0 %150.0–
Wholesale bonds – 6 yearsDec 21Dec 272 .73.656%200.0–
Wholesale bonds – 8 yearsSep 20Sep 283.42.262%50.0–
Wholesale bonds – 10 yearsSep 20Sep 305.42.559%150.0–
Green wholesale bonds – 5 yearsO c t 24Oct 294.55.012%150.0–
As at 31 March 2026, $100.0 million of syndicated bank facilities were provided by Westpac New
Zealand Limited
($50.0 million) and Bank of New
Zealand ($50.0 million).
As at 31 March 2025, $590.0 million of syndicated bank facilities were provided by Commonwealth Bank of Australia
($150.0 million), Westpac New
Zealand Limited ($135.0 million), The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation
Limited ($110.0 million), ANZ Bank New Zealand Limited ($100.0 million), Industrial and Commercial Bank of China
Limited ($70.0 million) and Bank of New
Zealand ($25.0 million).
As at 31 March 2026, GNZ’s drawn borrowings had a weighted average remaining term of 2.4 years (2025:
2.5
years), with 99% being drawn from non-bank sources (2025: 48%). As at 31 March 2025, calculation of the
weighted average remaining term assumes syndicated bank facilities utilise the longest dated facilities.
3. Borrowings (continued)
3.4 Security and covenants
All borrowing facilities are secured on an equal ranking basis over the property assets of the Group. A loan to value
ratio covenant restricts total borrowings incurred by the Group to 50% of the value of the secured property portfolio.
The Group has given a negative pledge to not create or permit any security interest over its property assets.
The principal financial ratios which must be met are the ratio of earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and
amortisation to interest expense, and the ratio of financial indebtedness to the value of the property portfolio. Further
negative and positive undertakings have been given as to the nature of the Group’s business. The Group has been
compliant with the covenants throughout both years.
3.5 Lease liabilities
Investment properties Office leases
$ million2026202520262025
Opening balance125.863.60.92.6
Changes in liability 54.462.37. 9(0.9)
Interest expense on lease liabilities9 .74.60.30.1
Payments made(3.3)(4.8)(1.1)(0.9)
Amortisation of incentives received–0.1––
Total lease liabilities186.6125.88.00.9
The lease liabilities are for perpetually renewable ground leases at Westney Industry Park for 276715 million (9.98:
279814 million) and The Gate Industry Park for 2819 million (9.98: 2.17 million). The calculation of the lease liabilities
assumes lease terms of between 3. and 30 years and utilises discount rates based on an assessment of GNZ’s
long-term borrowing costs at the time of the renewal, which range from 819ā to 416ā.
For the year ended 07 March 9.93, there were two further properties at Westney Industry Park which have ground
lease renewals with associated market rent reviews (in September 9.98 and March 9.93), yet to be agreed. For the
purposes of these financial statements, an estimated implied land rate has been used as the basis for the calculation
of the lease liability relating to that property. This rate is the approximate midpoint between the rate;
— per the independent valuation advice obtained by the Group; and
— the rate as served by the lessor of the property for which the review has yet to be agreed.
Sensitivities as applied to either option above would result in a change to the value of the lease liabilities being
,/-2991. million.
For the year ended 07 March 9.93, ground lease renewals have resulted in an increase to lease liabilities of
28515 million.
The Group has operating leases for its offices at 795 Halsey Street and 3. Highbrook Drive, Auckland. The Group has
recognised right of use assets (2418 million included within plant, property and equipment) and corresponding lease
liabilities in relation to these leases (9.98: 2.15 million). The office leases assume a lease term of 7. years with an
incremental borrowing rate of between 818ā – 319ā.
At the commencement date of a lease the Group recognises lease liabilities measured at the present value of lease
payments to be made over the lease term, including expected lease renewals. The lease payments include fixed
payments, less any lease incentives receivable.
9796
Financial Statements of
Goodman NZ
Notes to the Financial Statements (continued)
Financial Results
Goodman NZ
Annual Report 2026
ContentsYear in ReviewOur BusinessSustainabilityClimate-related DisclosuresOther Information
3. Borrowings (continued)
3.6 Net borrowings reconciliation
The table below details the annual movements in net debt.
$ million2025ProceedsRepaymentsOther2026
2026
Bank facilities76 0.0385.0(1,14 0.0)–5.0
Green retail bonds150.0–––150.0
Green wholesale bonds150.0–––150.0
Wholesale bonds4 00.0–––4 00.0
Unamortised costs(2.2)––1.2(1.0)
Total borrowings1 , 4 5 7. 8385.0(1,140.0)1.2704.0
Lease liabilities125.8––60.8186.6
Cash(8.2)––(2.3)(10.5)
Net borrowings1,575.4385.0(1,140.0)5 9.7880.1
$ million2024FX impactProceedsRepaymentsOther2025
2025
Bank facilities610.0–7 6 7. 0( 6 17. 0 )–76 0.0
Green retail bonds150.0––––150.0
Retail bonds10 0.0––(10 0.0)––
Green wholesale bonds––150.0––150.0
Wholesale bonds4 00.0––––4 00.0
US Private Placement notes200.9(4 0.2)–( 16 0 .7 )––
Unamortised costs(2.9)–––0 .7(2.2)
Total borrowings1,458.0(40.2)9 17. 0( 8 7 7.7 )0 .71 , 4 5 7. 8
Lease liabilities66.2–––59.6125.8
Cash(9.4)–––1.2(8.2)
Net borrowings1,514.8(40.2)9 17. 0( 8 7 7.7 )61.51,575.4
4. Contributed equity and distributions
The corporatisation and stapling transaction date has been determined as 31 March 2026, following which there is
only one class of share for each of GNZL and GPS, being ordinary shares, and they rank equally with each other. All
issued shares are fully paid, carry full voting rights, have no redemption rights, have no par value and are subject to the
terms of the constitution.
The shares in GNZL and GPS are “stapled” on a one-for-one basis. Stapling is a contractual and constitutional
arrangement under which the shares of the stapled entities are inseparably linked, held by the same shareholders, and
cannot be traded or transferred independently, with the stapled shares trading as a single economic unit with a single
quoted price.
Prior to 31 March 2026, the Group operated as GMT, a unit trust, with unitholders holding units in the Trust that
represented their beneficial interest in the underlying assets and operations of the Group.
4.1 Contributed equity
The table below details the annual movements for the Group in issued units / shares, weighted units / shares used in
earnings per share calculations and the value of issued units / shares.
Issued units / shares
Million
Weighted units / shares
Million
Value of units / shares
$ million
202620252026202520262025
Units at start of year1,538.81,538.81,538.81,538.81,955.01,955.0
Buyback and cancellation
of G
MT units(8.2)–(0.5)–(15.9)–
Units prior to
corporatisation and stapling1,530.61,538.81,538.31,538.81,939.11,955.0
GMT units cancelled
1
(1,530.6)–(1,538.3)–(1,939.1)–
GNZL / GPS shares
transferred to equity holders
1
1,530.6–1,538.3–1,939.1–
Total at end of year1,530.61,538.81,538.31,538.81,939.11,955.0
1
The transaction date has been determined as 31 March 2026. Legal completion of the transaction, including the cancellation of GMT units and the
transfer of stapled GNZL / GPS shares to equity holders, occurred after balance date on 7 April 2026.
In February 2026, the Board approved an on-market unit buyback program. Under the program, the Group
repurchased and cancelled 8.2 million GMT units for total consideration of $15.9 million.
4.2 GPS equity (non-controlling interest)
The table below details the total equity movements for GPS as a non-controlling interest, applicable for the 2026
financial year following the corporatisation and stapling transaction.
$ million20262025
Opening balance––
Non-controlling interests recognised in stapling transaction
Share capital33.5–
Retained earnings(32.3)–
Employee compensation reserve5.4–
Total at end of year6.6–
9998
Financial Statements of
Goodman NZ
Notes to the Financial Statements (continued)
Financial Results
Goodman NZ
Annual Report 2026
ContentsYear in ReviewOur BusinessSustainabilityClimate-related DisclosuresOther Information
4. Contributed equity and distributions (continued)
4.3 Distributions
20262025
Distribution per unit declared and paid during the year by GMT (cents per unit)6 .74 3 7 56.42500
Distributions value ($ million)1 0 3 .798.9
On 25 May 2026, combined cash dividends of 1.70625 cents per share were declared comprising a dividend from
GNZL of 1.70625 cents per share with no imputation credits attached and no dividend from GPS. The record date is
11 June 2026 and payment will be made on 18 June 2026.
5. Operating earnings and earnings per share
5.1 Operating earnings
Operating earnings is a non-GAAP financial measure included to provide an assessment of the performance of the
Group’s principal operating activities. This non-GAAP financial measure may not be consistent with its calculation by
other similar entities.
The calculation of operating earnings is set out below.
$ millionNote20262025
Profit before tax258.4130.9
Adjusting items:
Movement in fair value of investment property( 5 9 .7 )(11.1)
Movement in fair value of financial instruments7. 017. 1
Movement in fair value of legacy employee benefits10.31 3 .7
Transitional services1.11.1
Transaction costs5.12.6
Share of other income from associates
2.1(62.4)–
Operating earnings before tax159.8154.3
Current tax on operating earnings
14.1(32.2)(29.3)
Operating earnings after tax1 2 7. 6125.0
5. Operating earnings and earnings per share (continued)
5.2 Earnings per share
Earnings per share measures are calculated as set out below, with comparatives on a per unit basis. The weighted
average number of shares includes an adjustment for those acquired and cancelled under the on
-m
arket buyback
program.
Operating earnings before tax per share
Operating earnings per share metrics are reported for the stapled group only, being GNZ.
20262025
Operating earnings before tax ($ million)159.8154.3
Weighted shares (million)1,538.31,538.8
Operating earnings per share before tax (cents)10.3910.03
Operating earnings after tax per share
20262025
Operating earnings after tax ($ million)1 2 7. 6125.0
Weighted shares (million)1,538.31,538.8
Operating earnings per share after tax (cents)8.298.12
Basic and diluted earnings per share
Basic and diluted earnings per share for the current year is fully attributable to GNZL, with no earnings from GPS.
20262025
Profit after tax attributable to equity holders ($ million)248.0109.6
Weighted shares (million)1,538.31,538.8
Basic and diluted earnings per share after tax (cents)16.127. 1 2
6. Transaction costs
Transaction costs are costs incurred for the establishment of Goodman NZ Highbrook Limited Partnership and the
corporatisation and stapling transaction.
10110 0
Financial Statements of
Goodman NZ
Notes to the Financial Statements (continued)
Financial Results
Goodman NZ
Annual Report 2026
ContentsYear in ReviewOur BusinessSustainabilityClimate-related DisclosuresOther Information
7. Financial instruments
Financial instruments are used to manage exposure to interest rate risks and foreign exchange risks arising from
GNZ’s borrowings.
7. 1 Movement in fair value of financial instruments
$ million20262025
Interest rate derivatives( 7. 0 )(15.9)
Cross currency interest rate derivatives relating to US Private Placement notes–(41.4)
Total movement in fair value of derivative financial instruments(7.0)( 5 7. 3 )
Foreign exchange rate movement on US Private Placement notes–4 0.2
Total movement in fair value of financial instruments(7.0)( 17. 1 )
Financial instruments are initially recognised at fair value on the date a derivative contract is entered into and are
subsequently measured at fair value at each reporting date. Financial instruments are classified as current or non-
current based on their date of maturity.
Movements in the fair value of financial instruments are recognised through the statement of comprehensive income.
The Group does not apply hedge accounting.
The fair values of financial instruments are determined from valuations using Level 2 valuation techniques. These are
based on the present value of estimated future cash flows, taking account of the terms and maturity of each contract
and the current market interest rates at the reporting date. Fair values also reflect the creditworthiness of the derivative
counterparty and GNZ at balance date. The valuations were based on market rates at 76 March 2125 of between
29.84 for the 31-day BKBM and 89604 for the 0-year swap rate (212.: 79564 for the 31-day BKBM and 89614
61-year swap rate). There were no changes to these valuation techniques during the year.
7. 2 Financial instruments
$ million20262025
Non-current assets5.45.1
Current assets–0.2
Non-current liabilities–(14.3)
Net financial instruments5.4(9.0)
7. Financial instruments (continued)
7. 3 Additional derivative information
20262025
Weighted average term of fixed borrowings, including bonds (years)3.53.6
Percentage of borrowings fixed, including bonds97%83%
Interest rate derivatives
Notional contract value as fixed rate payer ($ million)255.0610.0
Interest rate range as fixed rate payer0.6% – 4.4% 0.4% – 5.0%
Notional contract value as fixed rate receiver ($ million)10 0.010 0.0
Interest rate range as fixed rate receiver4 .74%4 .74%
Interest rate caps
Notional contract value ($ million)50.0–
Interest rate cap 4.00%–
8. Net corporate costs
Net corporate costs are incurred to manage the operational activity of the Group.
$ million20262025
Salaries and other short-term benefits(14.3)(13.4)
Other administrative expenses(9.0)(8.6)
Less: Costs recognised in property expenses6.26.8
Less: Costs recognised in transaction costs1.11.4
Less: Costs capitalised to properties being developed2.22.9
Net corporate costs(13.8)(10.9)
All costs directly associated with the acquisition and development of a property are capitalised.
Fees paid to auditor
$20262025
Audit and review of financial statements(594,200)(696,900)
Audit or review related services
Agreed upon procedures(10,6 0 0)(14,8 0 0)
Other assurance services and agreed-upon procedures engagements
Climate and sustainability reporting related services(142,850)(157,000)
Other agreed upon procedures(34,000)–
Other services
Provision of remuneration benchmarking data–(74,000)
Total fees paid to auditor(781,650)(9 42 ,70 0)
103102
Financial Statements of
Goodman NZ
Notes to the Financial Statements (continued)
Financial Results
Goodman NZ
Annual Report 2026
ContentsYear in ReviewOur BusinessSustainabilityClimate-related DisclosuresOther Information
8. Net corporate costs (continued)
Audit or review related
services
Fees for audit or review related services of $10,600 comprise agreed-upon
procedures on the financial covenants of the bank facilities and reporting to the
supervisor of GNZ Bond Issuer Limited (2025: $14,800 comprise agreed upon
procedures on the financial covenants of the bank facilities, agreed upon procedures
on the NTA of GPS, and reporting to the supervisor of GNZ Bond Issuer Limited).
Other assurance services
and agreed-upon
procedures engagements
Fees for other assurance related services of $176,850 comprise $142,850
(2025:
$157,000) relating to climate related disclosures reporting and assurance
in regard to the use of proceeds for the Group’s green lending arrangements and
$34,000 (2025:
nil) relating to agreed-upon procedures acting in the role of
scrutineer in relation to special meetings of unitholders and bondholders.
Other servicesNo other services have been provided during the year. (2025: $74,000 for the
provision of remuneration benchmarking data).
9. Employee benefits liabilities
The legacy Goodman Group LTIP (legacy GMG LTIP) employee benefit expense relates to performance rights
previously awarded to employees under the Goodman Group (GMG) long-term incentive plan. All full-time and
part-time permanent employees were eligible to participate. The performance rights entitle an employee to acquire
GMG stapled securities for nil consideration, subject to the vesting conditions having been satisfied. At vesting,
settlement will be made directly by GMG with no additional financial impact to the Group than the value attributed to
the indemnification asset. The future performance and settlement of this award is a responsibility of GMG until the
vesting
conditions around the service period cease.
The legacy Goodman NZ LTIP (legacy NZ LTIP) share based payments expense relates to performance rights
previously awarded to employees under the legacy NZ LTIP. All full-time and part-time permanent employees
were eligible to participate. The performance rights entitle an employee to acquire GNZ stapled securities for nil
consideration, subject to the vesting conditions having been satisfied. These rights are vested subject to meeting
performance hurdles based on the achievement of operating earnings targets by GNZ and the relevant total
shareholder return from holding GNZ shares compared to other New
Zealand Stock Exchange (NZX) property vehicles.
At vesting, settlement will be made by a cash payment equivalent to the value of shares, with the financial impact to
the Group to be reimbursed by GMG as per the terms of the sale of the GPS to GNZ.
$ million20262025
Current
Employee entitlements4.63.4
Employee benefits liabilities – legacy GMG LTIP9.38.4
Employee benefits liabilities – legacy NZ LTIP6.35.3
Total current employee benefits liabilities20.217. 1
Non-current
Employee benefits liabilities – legacy GMG LTIP6.810.5
Employee benefits liabilities – legacy NZ LTIP4.57. 3
Total non-current employee benefits liabilities11.317. 8
Total employee benefits liabilities31.534.9
9. Employee benefits liabilities (continued)
Employee entitlements are initially recognised at fair value and subsequently measured at amortised cost. Items
recorded as current are expected to be settled within the next twelve months.
The Group has recognised an employee benefit expense in relation to the legacy GMG LTIP and a cash-settled share-
based payment in relation to the legacy NZ LTIP.
The legacy GMG LTIP performance rights are settled directly between GMG and employees of the Group. The liability
is calculated over the period to the vesting date and is adjusted to reflect the actual number of rights for which the
related service and non-market vesting conditions are expected to be met. The liability recognised is remeasured at
each balance date using the GMG market price and AUD / NZD exchange rate, with the movement in liability recorded
through the statement of comprehensive income.
The liability for the legacy NZ LTIP performance rights is calculated over the period to the vesting date and is adjusted
to reflect the actual number of rights for which the related service and non-market vesting conditions are expected to
be met. The liability recognised is remeasured at each balance date using the GNZ market price, with the movement in
liability recorded through the statement of comprehensive income.
The fair value of services received in return for performance rights granted under the legacy LTIPs is measured by
reference to the fair value of the performance rights granted. The fair value of these legacy LTIP performance rights is
measured as follows:
2 Operating earnings per share (EPS) hurdles: these are assessed using estimates of achieving these targets.
These estimates are based on information regarding the expected performance for GMG as publicly reported
and are consistent with the valuation approach taken by GMG for recognition of LTIPs in its financial statements or
based on internal forecast information in the business plan for GNZ as presented to the Board, both risk-adjusted
for the passage of time.
+ Relative total shareholder return (TSR) tranches: these rights were valued using a Monte Carlo model which
simulated total returns for each of the ASX 100 stocks / NZX property vehicle stocks and discounted the future
value of any potential future vesting performance rights to arrive at a present value. The model uses statistical
analysis to forecast total returns, based on expected parameters of variance and co-variance.
The movement in the number of legacy LTIP performance rights is as follows:
Legacy GMG LTIPLegacy NZ LTIP
Number of performance rights2026202520262025
Outstanding at the beginning of the year1,189,8801,4 89,6 0111,521,51914,021,851
Ve ste d(329,388)(295,029)(3,070,695)(2,454,911)
Cancelled( 2 7, 5 6 4 )(4,692)(35,424)(45,421)
Outstanding at the end of the year832,9281,189,8808,415,40011,521,519
10510 4
Financial Statements of
Goodman NZ
Notes to the Financial Statements (continued)
Financial Results
Goodman NZ
Annual Report 2026
ContentsYear in ReviewOur BusinessSustainabilityClimate-related DisclosuresOther Information
9. Employee benefits liabilities (continued)
The model inputs for the remeasurement of legacy LTIPs as at 31 March 2026 include the following:
Legacy GMG rightsLegacy NZ rights
Remeasurement inputs 31 March 2026
Issued in
F Y24
Issued in
F Y23
Issued in
F Y22
Issued in
F Y24
Issued in
F Y23
Issued in
F Y22
Fair value at measurement date ($)11.0230.6730.671.901.901.90
Security price ($)30.6730.6730.671.901.901.90
Exercise price ($)––––––
Expected volatility (%)22.38–––––
Rights’ expected weighted average life (years)1.40.4–1.20.2–
Dividend yield per annum (%)––––––
NZD / AUD exchange rate1.201.201.20–––
Average risk-free rate of interest per annum (%)4.13–––––
The model inputs for the remeasurement of legacy LTIPs as at 31 March 2025 include the following:
Legacy GMG rightsLegacy NZ rights
Remeasurement inputs 31 March 2025
Issued in
F Y24
Issued in
F Y23
Issued in
F Y22
Issued in
F Y21
Issued in
F Y24
Issued in
F Y23
Issued in
F Y22
Issued in
F Y21
Fair value at measurement date ($)18.2817. 2 231.2731.270.611.871.871.87
Security price ($)31.2731.2731.2731.271.871.871.871.87
Exercise price ($)––––––––
Expected volatility (%)27.012 7. 4 6––13.99–––
Rights’ expected weighted average life (years)2.41.40.4–2.21.20.2–
Dividend yield per annum (%)––––3 .7 5–––
NZD / AUD exchange rate1.101.101.101.10n /an /an /an /a
Average risk-free rate of interest per annum (%)3.804.01––3.50–––
10. Related party assets
Goodman Group has indemnified the Group for the settlement of the existing legacy LTIPs that GPS staff are entitled
to. All costs and liabilities owing to the employees relating to awards granted before settlement of the internalisation
of GMT in March 2024 will be met by Goodman Group. An indemnification payment of $5.9 million in relation to the
legacy NZ LTIP was received from Goodman Group in the year (2025: $5.3 million).
$ million20262025
Current
Co-operation Services Agreement1.11.1
Indemnification assets6.49.5
Prepayment assets9.65.5
Total current related party assets17. 116.1
Non-current
Co-operation Services Agreement7. 89.0
Indemnification assets3 .79 .7
Prepayment assets11.921.8
Total non-current related party assets23.440.5
Total related party assets40.556.6
10. Related party assets (continued)
The Co-operation Services Agreement with Goodman Group is initially recognised at fair value and subsequently
measured at amortised cost (over an initial 27-year amortisation period).
The indemnification assets are recognised as part of the business combination in relation to the past service
component of the legacy LTIPs. The value of the indemnification assets is therefore equal to the legacy LTIP liabilities
recognised at acquisition date and is subsequently measured on the same basis as the corresponding LTIP liability
(see note 6) with the movements recognised through the statement of comprehensive income.
Prepayment assets are recognised for the years remaining on the legacy LTIP schemes in relation to the component of
the total consideration paid, being the future service element. As part of the internalisation transaction, a prepayment
has been recognised in return for Goodman Limited assuming the liability for the legacy LTIPs for which GPS receives
the benefit of the future service from the employees. This asset is initially recognised at cost, being the fair value at the
date of settlement and subsequently measured at cost less impairment over the term of the prepayment.
11 . Employee compensation reserve
GNZ Long-term incentive plan (Equity-settled)
The Group’s equity settled scheme (GNZ LTIP) offers performance rights to all permanent employees, with vesting
determined at the end of a 3-year vesting period. Vesting is subject to the achievement of certain financial hurdles set
by the Board and included in the annual offer of participation to employees. Once it has been determined how many
performance rights have vested, each performance right will convert to one fully paid ordinary share in each of GNZL
and GPS, vesting into three equally sized tranches after three, four and five years from grant date.
The key terms and conditions related to the shares under the GNZ LTIP are as follows:
+The shares are granted for nil consideration and have a nil exercise price.
+The participant must remain an employee of the Group as at the relevant vesting date for each tranche of shares.
+The vesting conditions include performance hurdles that must be met over a three-year testing period, with
vesting in equal tranches, annually, from the end of year three to the end of year five.
— Relative Total Shareholder Return (TSR) – 25% weighting. The 2025 and 2026 grants will be tested
against the relative TSR for GNZ compared with the total shareholder returns of participants of the S&P/
NZX50 and GNZ’s cash earnings per share over the three-year performance testing period to March 2027
and March 2028.
— Cash Earnings Per Share (EPS) – 75% weighting. The EPS portion of the 2025 and 2026 grants align
with annualised cash earnings growth targets for GNZ which have been set between 5% and 7% compound
annual growth rate within a three-year period.
107106
Financial Statements of
Goodman NZ
Notes to the Financial Statements (continued)
Financial Results
Goodman NZ
Annual Report 2026
ContentsYear in ReviewOur BusinessSustainabilityClimate-related DisclosuresOther Information
11. Employee compensation reserve (continued)
The performance rights are measured at fair value at the grant date and expensed with a corresponding increase
in equity over the period during which the participant becomes unconditionally entitled to the shares, based on
an estimate of shares that will eventually vest. The fair value of the performance rights which are vested and the
corresponding shares which are issued are transferred from the ‘employee compensation reserve’ to ‘shares’ upon
issue of the shares.
The fair value of services received in return for performance rights granted under the LTIP is measured by reference to
the fair value of the performance rights granted. The fair value of these LTIP performance rights is measured as follows:
2 EPS hurdles: are assessed using estimates of achieving these targets. These estimates are based on internal
forecast information in the business plan for GNZ as presented to the Board, both risk adjusted for the passage
of time.
2 Relative TSR tranches: these rights are valued using a Monte Carlo model which simulates total returns for each
of the NZX76 stocks and discounts the future value of any potential future vesting performance rights to arrive
at a present value. The model uses statistical analysis to forecast total returns, based on expected parameters of
variance and co-variance.
The movement in the number of performance rights is as follows:
Number of performance rights
G N Z LT I P
2026
G N Z LT I P
2025
Outstanding at the beginning of the year10,054,090–
Granted11,221,10 010,114,4 4 0
Cancelled(55,555)(60,350)
Outstanding at the end of the year21,219,63510,054,090
The model inputs for the GNZ LTIP at issuance date includes the following:
Measurement inputs at issuance date
Rights
issued in
FY26
Rights
issued in
F Y25
Fair value at measurement date ($)0.800.81
Security price ($)1.922.05
Exercise price ($)––
Expected volatility15.6716.58
Rights’ expected weighted average life (years)3.203.20
Distribution yield per annum (%)3.90%3.8 4%
Average risk-free rate of interest per annum (%)3.56%3 .76 %
12. Debtors and other assets
$ million20262025
Debtors1.00.5
Prepayments4.02.5
Interest receivable9.42.9
Other assets2.80.8
Total debtors and other assets17. 26 .7
Debtors and other assets are initially recognised at fair value and subsequently measured at amortised cost. They are
adjusted for expected impairment losses. Discounting is not applied to receivables where collection is expected to
occur within the next twelve months.
A provision for impairment is recognised when there is objective evidence that the Group will be unable to collect
amounts due. The simplified approach to providing for expected credit losses has been applied, permitting the use of
a lifetime expected loss provision for all trade receivables. The amount provided is the difference between the carrying
amount and expected recoverable amount.
13. Creditors and other liabilities
$ million20262025
Non-current
Highbrook disposal provisions2 .7–
Total non-current creditors and other liabilities2 .7–
Current
Trade creditors0.91.9
Interest payable10.213.1
Accrued capital expenditure11.512.8
Highbrook disposal provisions6.5–
Other liabilities6.011.1
Total current creditors and other liabilities35.138.9
Total creditors and other liabilities3 7. 838.9
Creditors and other liabilities are initially recognised at fair value and subsequently measured at amortised cost.
10 9108
Financial Statements of
Goodman NZ
Notes to the Financial Statements (continued)
Financial Results
Goodman NZ
Annual Report 2026
ContentsYear in ReviewOur BusinessSustainabilityClimate-related DisclosuresOther Information
14. Tax
14.1 Tax expense
$ million20262025
Profit before tax258.4130.9
Tax at 28%(72.4)(3 6 .7 )
Depreciation of investment property9.08.5
Movement in fair value of investment property31.23.1
Movement in fair value of legacy employee benefits(2.9)(3.8)
Share based payments expense(1.2)(0.3)
Deductible net expenditure for investment property4.24.1
Financial instruments1.2(4.5)
Transaction costs(1.3)(0.6)
Investment in associates fee recognition( 0 .7 )–
Prior year adjustments0 .70.9
Current tax on operating earnings(32.2)(29.3)
Depreciation recovered on disposed investment property(8.6)–
Financial instruments5.84.2
Legacy employee benefit deductions3.5–
Prior year adjustments0.9–
Current tax on non-operating earnings1.64.2
Tax losses utilised32.423.3
Total current tax1.8(1.8)
Depreciation of investment property(9.1)(8.5)
Reduction of liability in respect of depreciation recovery income9.19.4
Depreciation released for investment property sold 11.5–
Deferred expenses9.3(1.2)
Financial instruments( 7. 3 )0.3
Employee benefits liabilities4.23.8
Investment in associates fee recognition0 .7–
Prior period adjustment1.8–
Tax losses (32.4)(23.3)
Deferred tax(12.2)(19.5)
Total tax expense(10.4)(21.3)
Current tax on operating earnings is a non-GAAP measure included to provide an assessment of current tax for the
Group’s principal operating activities. This non-GAAP financial measure may not be consistent with its calculation by
other similar entities.
14. Tax (continued)
14.1 Tax expense (continued)
Tax expense for the year comprises current and deferred tax recognised in the statement of comprehensive income.
Current tax is the expected tax payable on the taxable income for the year, using tax rates enacted or substantively
enacted at balance date, and includes any adjustment to tax payable in respect of previous years.
Deferred tax is provided in full using the liability method, providing for temporary differences between the carrying
amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and their tax bases.
Deferred tax is not accounted for if it arises from the initial recognition of assets or liabilities in a transaction, other
than a business combination, that affects neither accounting nor taxable profit or loss nor to differences relating to
investments in subsidiaries to the extent that they will probably not reverse in the foreseeable future, and do not give
rise to equal deductible and taxable temporary differences.
14.2 Deferred tax
$ million20262025
Deferred tax assets
Tax losses6.236.8
Employee compensation reserve1.30.2
Lease liabilities2.2–
Employee benefits liabilities8.09.5
Investment in associates fee recognition0 .7–
Total deferred tax assets18.446.5
Deferred tax liabilities
Investment properties – depreciation recoverable(5.5)( 17. 0 )
Investment properties – deferred expenses(6.2)(15.5)
Financial instruments( 4 .7 )2.6
Borrowings issue costs(0.1)(0.1)
Indemnification assets(1.3)(5.9)
Right of use assets(2.2)–
Total deferred tax liabilities(20.0)(35.9)
Net deferred tax (liability) / asset(1.6)10.6
Deferred tax assets and liabilities have not been offset on the balance sheet as they relate to separate taxable
entities. Accordingly, the net deferred tax liability of $1.6 million is presented as a deferred tax asset of $8.3 million
(relating to GPS) and a deferred tax liability of $9.9 million (relating to GNZL).
111110
Financial Statements of
Goodman NZ
Notes to the Financial Statements (continued)
Financial Results
Goodman NZ
Annual Report 2026
ContentsYear in ReviewOur BusinessSustainabilityClimate-related DisclosuresOther Information
14. Tax (continued)
14.2 Deferred tax (continued)
The amount of deferred tax provided is based on the expected manner of realisation or settlement of the carrying
amount of assets and liabilities, using tax rates enacted or substantively enacted at the balance date.
A deferred tax asset is recognised only to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profits will be available
against which the asset can be utilised. Deferred tax assets are reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that
the related tax benefit will be realised.
For deferred tax liabilities potentially arising on investment property measured at fair value there is a rebuttable
presumption that the carrying amount of the investment property asset will be recovered through sale. In estimating
this deferred tax liability, the Group has made reference to its experience of tax depreciation recovered when
properties of a similar nature have been sold.
15. Related party disclosures
Related party assets are disclosed in note 10. Goodman Group (a stapled entity comprising Goodman Limited,
Goodman Industrial Trust and Goodman Logistics (HK) Limited) and its entities continue to be related parties of
the Group as GIH and GIT are significant shareholders, with Goodman NZ being equity accounted in the financial
statements of Goodman Group.
EntityNature of related party relationship
Goodman Investment Holdings (NZ) LimitedGIHShareholder in the Group.
Goodman Industrial TrustGITShareholder in the Group through
Goodman Funds Management Limited
as responsible entity for the Goodman
Industrial Trust.
Goodman LimitedGLParent entity of GIH and provider of
support services to the Group under a
co-operation services agreement.
Goodman NZ Highbrook Limited PartnershipHLPEquity accounted associate in which
GNZL
is a partner and GPS is the Manager.
Refer to note 2 for more details.
GNZ Highbrook General Partner LimitedHGPEquity accounted associate in which
GNZL is a shareholder and GPS provides
management services. Refer to note 2
for
more details.
15. Related party disclosures (continued)
15.1 Transactions with related parties
RecordedOutstanding
$ millionRelated party2026202520262025
Investment management fee incomeHLP4.3–2.3–
Property management fee incomeHLP2.2–0.4–
Establishment fee incomeHLP4.3–––
Total fee income10.8–2 .7–
Distributions receivedHLP9 .7–––
Disposal of investment propertiesHLP2 , 1 0 9 .7–––
Other assets associated with
disposal
of investment propertiesHLP1.2–––
Gross lease paymentsHLP(0.2)–––
Disposal provisions paymentsHLP(1.5)–––
Transitional servicesGL(1.1)(1.1)––
Distributions paidGIT( 16 .7 )(13.5)––
Distributions paidGIH(16.3)( 17. 9 )––
On 30 September 2025, Highbrook Business Park was sold to HLP, a related party, for $2.1 billion.
The following table details the transactions between GNZL (GMT prior to 31 March 2026) and GPS, which are
eliminated on consolidation.
$ million 20262025
Charged by GPS to GNZL
Property management fees5.46 .7
Cost recovery income3.51 9 .7
Cost recharges0.50.3
Total charged9.42 6 .7
Charged by GNZL to GPS
Gross lease receipts 0.10.2
The following balances were receivable / (payable) between GNZL and GPS
GPS – related party payable (recognised in GNZL)(8.9)(10.0)
GPS – related party receivable (recognised in GNZL)4.314.1
GNZL – related party payable (recognised in GPS)(4.3)(14.1)
GNZL – related party receivable (recognised in GPS)8.910.0
GPS provided management services to GNZL / GMT on a cost recovery basis prior to 31 March 2026.
113112
Financial Statements of
Goodman NZ
Notes to the Financial Statements (continued)
Financial Results
Goodman NZ
Annual Report 2026
ContentsYear in ReviewOur BusinessSustainabilityClimate-related DisclosuresOther Information
15. Related party disclosures (continued)
15.2 Other related party transactions
Key management personnel
Key management personnel are those people with the responsibility and authority for planning, directing and
controlling the activities of an entity. The key management personnel are considered to be the Directors, the Chief
Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer and the General Counsel. Total key management personnel expenses
are detailed in the table below:
$ million 20262025
Short-term employee benefits2.12.4
Share based payments – GNZ LTIP 1.30.3
Share based payments – legacy LTIPs4 .74.8
Directors’ fees0.60.5
To t a l 8 .78.0
For the year ended 31 March 2026 there were no post-employment benefits, other long-term benefits or termination
benefits (2025: none).
Related party investment in the Group
At 31 March 2026, Goodman Group, through its subsidiary Goodman Investment Holdings (NZ) Limited, held
241,863,312 shares in each of GNZL and GPS out of a total 1,530,611,273 shares on issue in each of GNZL and
GPS (31 March 2025: 241,863,312 units in GMT out of a total 1,538,768,535 units).
At 31 March 2026, Goodman Group, through Goodman Funds Management Limited (as the responsible entity for
Goodman Industrial Trust), held 247,071,396 shares in each of GNZL and GPS out of a total 1,530,611,273 shares
on issue in each of GNZL and GPS (31 March 2025: 247,071,396 units in GMT out of a total 1,538,768,535 units).
Licence to use Goodman brand
Goodman Group have granted GNZL and GPS a non-exclusive, non-transferable licence to continue to use the
“Goodman” brand for so long as Goodman Group holds at least 10% of the shares in the Group. There is no ongoing
fee payable for use of the Goodman brand under the Brand Licence Agreement.
In using the Goodman brand, GNZL and GPS are required to follow Goodman Group brand guidelines and Goodman
Group may terminate the licence in customary circumstances, including in the event of a serious unremedied breach.
There is a two-month transition period to cease using the brand once the Group is no longer entitled to do so.
16. Commitments and contingencies
16.1 Capital commitments
These commitments are amounts payable for contractually agreed services for capital expenditure.
$ million20262025
Completion of developments48.418.0
Property acquisition50.8–
Office fit-out –1.5
Total capital commitments99.219.5
16.2 Contingent liabilities
The Group has no material contingent liabilities (2025: none).
17. Reconciliation of profit after tax to net cash flows from operating activities
$ million20262025
Profit after tax248.0109.6
Non-cash items:
Movement in fair value of investment property( 5 9 .7 )(11.1)
Deferred lease incentives and leasing costs9.42 .7
Fixed rental income adjustments(3.0)(5.0)
Issue costs and subsequent amortisation for non-bank borrowings1.20 .7
Movement in fair value of financial instruments7. 017. 1
Movement in valuation of legacy employee benefits10.31 3 .7
Transitional services1.11.1
Share based payment expense4.21.2
Tax expense(12.2)(3.8)
Share of earnings from associates( 8 4 .7 )–
Net cash flows from operating activities before changes in assets and liabilities121.6126.2
Movements in working capital from:
Debtors and other assets(0.5)7. 1
Creditors and other liabilities1.55.3
Tax liabilities11.22 2 .7
Movements in working capital12.235.1
Net cash flows from operating activities133.8161.3
115114
Financial Statements of
Goodman NZ
Notes to the Financial Statements (continued)
Financial Results
Goodman NZ
Annual Report 2026
ContentsYear in ReviewOur BusinessSustainabilityClimate-related DisclosuresOther Information
18. Financial risk management
In addition to business risk associated with the Group’s principal activity of investing in and managing real estate in
New Zealand, the Group is also exposed to financial risk for the financial instruments that it holds. Financial risk can be
classified in the following categories: interest rate risk, credit risk, liquidity risk and capital management risk.
18.1 Financial instruments
The following items in the balance sheet are classified as financial instruments: Cash, short-term deposits, debtors
and other assets (excluding prepayments), financial instruments, creditors and other liabilities, lease liabilities and
borrowings. All items are recorded at amortised cost with the exception of derivative financial instruments, which are
recorded at fair value through profit or loss.
Financial instruments are classified dependent on the purpose for which the financial instrument was acquired or
assumed. Management determines the classification of its financial instruments at initial recognition between two
categories:
+ Amortised cost: Instruments recorded at amortised cost are those with fixed or determined receipts / payments
that are recorded at their expected value at balance date.
+ Fair value through profit or loss: Instruments recorded at fair value through the statement of comprehensive
income have their fair value measured via active market inputs, or by using valuation techniques if no active
market exists.
18.2 Interest rate risk
The Group’s interest rate risk arises from borrowings. The Group manages its interest rate risk in accordance with its
Financial Risk Management policy. The principal objective of the Group’s interest rate risk management process is to
mitigate negative interest rate volatility adversely affecting financial performance.
The Group manages its interest rate risk by using floating-to-fixed interest rate swaps and interest rate caps. Interest
rate swaps and interest rate caps (when effective) have the economic effect of converting borrowings from floating rates
to fixed rates. Generally, the Group raises long-term borrowings at floating rates and swaps them into fixed rates that are
lower than those available if the Group borrowed directly at fixed rates. Under the interest rate swaps, the Group agrees
with other parties to exchange, at specified intervals (primarily quarterly), the difference between fixed contract rates
and floating-rate interest amounts calculated by reference to the agreed notional amounts. Under interest rate caps,
the Group agrees to pay the floating rate up to the cap limit at which point it replicates an interest rate swap. Where the
Group raises long-term borrowings at fixed rates, it may enter into fixed-to-floating interest rate swaps or interest rate
caps to enable the cash flow interest rate risk to be managed in conjunction with its floating rate borrowings.
The table below considers the direct impact to interest costs of a 1% change to interest rates.
$ million20262025
Impact of a 1% increase in interest rates(0.3)(2.5)
Impact of a 1% decrease in interest rates0.32.5
1 17116
Financial Statements of
Goodman NZ
Notes to the Financial Statements (continued)
18. Financial risk management (continued)
18.3 Credit risk
Credit risk arises from cash, short-term deposits, financial instruments, credit exposures to customers and credit
exposure to banks. For banks and financial institutions only independently credit rated parties are accepted, and
when short-term deposits or derivative contracts are entered into their credit risk is assessed. For customers and
related parties, the Group assesses the credit quality, considering its financial position, past experience and any other
relevant factors. The overall credit risk is managed with a credit policy that monitors exposures and ensures that the
Group does not bear unacceptable concentrations of credit risk.
The Group’s maximum exposure to credit risk is best represented by the total of its debtors, financial instrument assets,
short-term deposits and cash as shown in the balance sheet. To mitigate credit risk the Group holds security deposits,
bank guarantees, parent company guarantees or personal guarantees from customers as deemed appropriate.
18.4 Liquidity risk
Liquidity risk is the risk that the Group will encounter difficulty in meeting obligations from its financial liabilities.
The Group’s approach to management of liquidity risk is to ensure that it will always have sufficient liquidity to meet
its liabilities when due, under both normal and stressed conditions, without incurring unacceptable losses or risking
damage to the Group’s reputation. The Group manages this risk through active monitoring of the Group’s liquidity
position and availability of borrowings from committed facilities.
The following table outlines the Group’s financial liabilities by their relevant contractual maturity date. Values are the
contractual undiscounted cash flows and include both principal and interest where applicable. Contractual maturity
dates for lease liabilities are presented based on the relevant five
-year periods in which the underlying leases are
subject to market rent reviews.
$ millionYe a r 1Ye a r 2Ye a r 3Ye a r 4Ye a r 5
Ye a r 6
and later
To t a l
cash flows
Carrying
value
2026
Borrowings2 7. 1373.161.81 5 7. 81 51 .7–771.5705.0
Financial instruments––––––––
Lease liabilities12.01 1 .711.19.43.2–4 7. 4194.6
Creditors and other liabilities35.1–––––35.135.1
To t a l74.2384.872.91 6 7. 2154.9–854.09 3 4 .7
2025
Borrowings383.6194.6526.0198.41 5 7. 81 51 .71,612.11,460.0
Financial instruments2.52.52.21.41.00 .710.314.3
Lease liabilities8 .77.77. 46.95.1–35.81 2 6 .7
Creditors and other liabilities38.9–––––38.938.9
To t a l4 3 3 .7204.8535.62 0 6 .7163.9152.41 , 6 9 7. 11,639.9
18.5 Capital management risk
The Group’s policy is to maintain a strong capital base to maintain investor, creditor and market confidence, while
maximising the return to investors through optimising the mix of debt and equity. The Group meets its objectives
for managing capital through its investment decisions on the acquisition, development and disposal of assets, its
distribution policy, buyback of equity and raising new equity. The Group’s policies in respect of capital management
are reviewed regularly by the Board of Directors.
The Group’s capital structure includes bank debt, retail bonds, wholesale bonds and shareholders’ equity. A loan to
value ratio covenant restricts total borrowings incurred by the Group to 50% of the aggregate value of its property
assets. The Group complied with this requirement during this year and the prior year.
Financial Results
Goodman NZ
Annual Report 2026
ContentsYear in ReviewOur BusinessSustainabilityClimate-related DisclosuresOther Information
119118
Financial Statements of
Goodman NZ
Notes to the Financial Statements (continued)
18. Financial risk management (continued)
18.6 Fair value of financial instruments
Except for the green retail bonds, wholesale bonds and green wholesale bonds, the carrying values of all balance
sheet financial instruments approximate their estimated fair value. The fair values of green retail bonds, wholesale
bonds and green wholesale bonds are as follows:
$ millionFair value hierarchy20262025
Green retail bondsLevel 1151.4150.2
Wholesale bondsLevel 2373.1368.0
Green wholesale bondsLevel 214 5.314 6.1
The Group classifies its fair value measurements using a fair value hierarchy that reflects the significance of the inputs
used in making the measurements. The fair value hierarchy has the following levels:
+ Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
+ Level 2: Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either
directly (i.e. as prices) or indirectly (i.e. derived from prices).
+ L
evel 3: Inputs for the asset or liability that are not based on observable market data (i.e. unobservable inputs).
The fair value of financial instruments classified as Level 2, being wholesale bonds and green wholesale bonds is measured
using a present value calculation of the future cash flows using the relevant term swap rate as the discount
factor.
The level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement is categorised is determined on the basis
of the lowest input to the fair value measurement. If a fair value measurement uses observable inputs that require
significant adjustment based on unobservable inputs, the measurement is a Level 3 measurement.
The Group’s policy is to recognise transfers into and transfers out of fair value hierarchy levels at the date of the event
or change in circumstances that caused the transfer. During the year, there were no transfers between levels of the fair
value hierarchy.
19. Major customer disclosure
The Group is required to provide information about the extent of its reliance on its major customers (being 10 per cent
or more of the Group’s revenues). For the year ended 31 March 2026, the Group had one customer with total revenue
of $24.5 million, being 11.0% of the Group’s revenue (2025: one customer with total revenue of $33.9 million, being
12.3% of the Group’s revenue).
20. Operating segments
The Group determines and presents operating segments based on the information that is provided internally to the
Chief Operating Decision Maker (CODM), which is responsible for allocating resources and assessing performance.
The CODM has been identified as the respective boards of GNZL and GPS.
20. Operating segments (continued)
Following the corporatisation and stapling transaction on 31 March 2026, the Group comprises two principal components:
+GNZL (GMT prior to 31 March 2026) – is a PIE and holds the Group’s property investment activities and its
investments in associates.
+G
PS – is not a PIE and undertakes the Group’s property management and funds management activities.
Elimination – transactions between GNZL and GPS that are eliminated for the Group.
These components reflect how the Group is structured and managed internally. The following section provides an
analysis of the Group’s results by reportable segment.
Segment profit or loss 2026
$ millionGNZLGPSElimination2026
Property income223.1––223.1
Property expenses(4 4.0)–5.4(38.6)
Net property income17 9 . 1–5.4184.5
Fee income–16.2(5.4)10.8
Cost recovery income–3.5(3.5)–
Interest cost(48.0)(0.3)–(48.3)
Interest income8.40.1–8.5
Net interest cost(39.6)(0.2)–(39.8)
Net corporate costs3.3(20.6)3.5(13.8)
Share based payments expense–(4.2)–(4.2)
Profit before other expenses and tax142.8(5.3)–137.5
Other income / (expenses)
Share of earnings from associates8 4 .7––8 4 .7
Movement in fair value of investment property5 9 .7––5 9.7
Movement in fair value of financial instruments( 7. 0 )––(7.0)
Movement in fair value of legacy employee benefits(8.5)(1.8)–(10.3)
Transitional services–(1.1)–(1.1)
Transaction costs(5.1)––(5.1)
Profit before tax266.6(8.2)–258.4
Tax expense(18.6)8.2–(10.4)
Profit after tax attributable to equity holders248.0––248.0
Other comprehensive income––––
Total comprehensive income for the year attributable
to
equity holders248.0––248.0
Financial Results
Goodman NZ
Annual Report 2026
ContentsYear in ReviewOur BusinessSustainabilityClimate-related DisclosuresOther Information
121120
Financial Statements of
Goodman NZ
Notes to the Financial Statements (continued)
To the shareholders of Goodman New Zealand Limited and Goodman Property Services (NZ) Limited
In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated financial statements (the financial statements) of Goodman New Zealand
Limited (GNZL) and its subsidiaries and Goodman Property Services (NZ) Limited (GPS), together Goodman NZ or the Group,
present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Group as at 31 March 2026, its financial performance, and its
cash flows for the year then ended in accordance with New Zealand Equivalents to International Financial Reporting Standards
(NZ IFRS) and International Financial Reporting Standards Accounting Standards (IFRS Accounting Standards).
The Group’s financial statements comprise:
—the balance sheet as at 31 March 2026;
—the statement of comprehensive income for the year then ended;
—the statement of changes in equity for the year then ended;
—the statement of cash flows for the year then ended; and
—the notes to the financial statements, comprising material accounting policy information and other explanatory information.
We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (New Zealand) (ISAs (NZ)) and International
Standards on Auditing (ISAs). Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the Auditor’s responsibilities
for the audit of the financial statements section of our report.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.
We are independent of the Group in accordance with Professional and Ethical Standard 1 International Code of Ethics for
Assurance Practitioners (including International Independence Standards) (New Zealand) issued by the New Zealand Auditing
and Assurance Standards Board (PES 1) and the International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (including
International Independence Standards) issued by the International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants (IESBA Code), as
applicable to audits of financial statements of public interest entities. We have also fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in
accordance with PES 1 and the IESBA Code.
In our capacity as auditor and assurance practitioner, our firm also provides review, agreed-upon procedures and other
assurance services. The firm has no other relationship with, or interests in, the Group.
20. Operating segments (continued)
Segment profit or loss 2025
$ millionGMTGPSElimination2025
Property income2 7 7. 9––2 7 7. 9
Property expenses(5 4.1)–6 .7( 4 7. 4 )
Net property income223.8–6 .7230.5
Fee income–6 .7( 6 .7 )–
Cost recovery income–1 9 .7( 1 9 .7 )–
Interest cost(64.9)––(64.9)
Interest income0.8––0.8
Net interest cost(64.1)––(64.1)
Net corporate costs(11.6)(19.0)1 9 .7(10.9)
Share based payments expense–(1.2)–(1.2)
Profit before other expenses and tax148.16.2–154.3
Other income / (expenses)
Movement in fair value of investment property11.1––11.1
Movement in fair value of financial instruments( 17. 1 )––( 17. 1 )
Movement in fair value of legacy employee benefits( 8 .7 )(5.0)–(13 .7 )
Transitional services–(1.1)–(1.1)
Transaction costs(2.6)––(2.6)
Profit before tax130.80.1–130.9
Tax expense(21.2)(0.1)–(21.3)
Profit after tax attributable to equity holders109.6––109.6
Other comprehensive income––––
Total comprehensive income for the year attributable
to
equity holders109.6––109.6
Segment assets and liabilities 2026
$ millionGNZLGPSElimination2026
Assets4,190.54 4.1(13.2)4,221.4
Liabilities (953.5)( 3 7. 5 )13.2( 9 7 7. 8 )
Net assets3,237.06.6–3,243.6
Segment assets and liabilities 2025
$ millionGMTGPSElimination2025
Assets4,777.132.4(24.1)4 ,78 5. 4
Liabilities (1,668.5)(30.0)24.1(1 ,6 74 . 4)
Net assets3,108.62.4–3,111.0
PricewaterhouseCoopers, PwC Tower, 15 Customs Street West, Private Bag 92162, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand
T: +64 9 355 8000, www.pwc.co.nz
Financial Results
Goodman NZ
Annual Report 2026
ContentsYear in ReviewOur BusinessSustainabilityClimate-related DisclosuresOther Information
123122
Accounting for the corporatisation and stapling
Refer to the general information section of the financial
statements.
During the year, the Group completed a corporatisation
and stapling transaction, resulting in a fundamental
change to its legal and operating structure. This
included the replacement of units in Goodman Property
Trust (GMT) with ordinary shares in GNZL and the
establishment of a stapled security structure with GPS.
The accounting for this transaction required significant
judgement, and these judgements are complex due to the
absence of specific guidance in NZ IFRS 10 Consolidated
Financial Statements for common control transactions
and stapled structures. This included determining
whether the transaction is within the scope of NZ IFRS 3
Business Combinations or represented a common control
reorganisation, identifying GNZL as the parent entity in
the stapled structure, and determining the appropriate
transaction date for accounting purposes.
We considered this to be a key audit matter due to the
complexity of the transaction, the significant judgement
involved, and the audit effort required to evaluate
management’s accounting conclusions.
Our procedures included, among others:
—Obtaining an understanding of management’s process
over the accounting for the corporatisation and stapling
transaction.
—Evaluating management’s assessment of the transaction
as a common control reorganisation by considering the
substance of the transaction and the control retained by
GMT throughout, and, as part of this assessment, assessing
management’s accounting analysis against the requirements
of the relevant accounting standards.
—Assessing key legal documentation, including the stapling
deed between GNZL and GPS and relevant trust deed
amendments, to understand the legal form and substance of
the transaction.
—Evaluating management’s determination of GNZL as the
parent entity in the stapled structure, by considering the
common control arrangement and the relative size and role
of the entities involved. We also assessed the consolidation
implications arising from the stapled structure.
—Evaluating the determination of the transaction date by
reference to unitholder approvals, board resolutions and other
supporting legal documentation.
—Considering the appropriateness of disclosures made in the
financial statements.
Determining the treatment for the investment
in
associates
Refer to note 2 and the general information section of
the financial statements.
On 30 September 2025, the Group sold its investment
in Highbrook Business Park to Goodman NZ Highbrook
Limited Partnership (HLP) for a gross price of
$2,109.7 million and, as part of the transaction, acquired
a 71.1% interest in HLP and GNZ Highbrook General
Partner Limited (HGP) for consideration comprising
equity of $899.9 million and cash.
The accounting for this transaction involved significant
judgement, particularly in assessing whether the Group
controls HLP and HGP or has significant influence, and
therefore whether the investment should be accounted
for as a subsidiary or an associate in accordance with
NZ IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial Statements and
NZ IAS 28 Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures.
We considered this to be a key audit matter due to the size
of the transaction, and the significant judgement involved
in determining the appropriate accounting treatment.
Our procedures included, among others:
—Assessing key agreements to understand the rights and
obligations of the parties.
—Recalculating the gain on disposal by comparing the
consideration received to the carrying value of the investment
properties at the date of disposal.
—Assessed the Group’s conclusion that it does not control
HLP or HGP by evaluating the governance structure,
decision-making rights, and relevant contractual
arrangements against the requirements of NZ IFRS 10.
—Tested the application of the equity method of accounting
for HLP and HGP to supporting documents, including
whether profits on transactions with the associate had been
appropriately eliminated.
—Considering the appropriateness of disclosures made in the
financial statements.
Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgement, were of most significance in our audit of the financial
statements of the current year. These matters were addressed in the context of our audit of the financial statements as a whole,
and in forming our opinion thereon, and we do not provide a separate opinion on these matters.
Valuation of investment property
Refer to note 1 to the financial statements.
As at 31 March 2026, the Group’s investment
property portfolio comprised stabilised properties
of $2,522.5 million and investment property under
development of $149.0 million, with a total carrying
value of $2,671.5 million.
The valuation of investment property is inherently
subjective. Small changes in key assumptions, when
aggregated across the portfolio, could result in a material
change in the carrying value. Key assumptions applied
include, but are not limited to, market capitalisation rates,
discount rates, market rental, rental growth rates and
terminal capitalisation rates. These assumptions are
influenced by market conditions and property-specific
factors such as tenancy arrangements and the quality
and location of assets.
Management engaged independent registered valuers
to assist in determining the fair value of the investment
property portfolio. The valuers engaged by management
are experienced in the markets in which the Group
operates and are rotated across the portfolio, with the
lead valuer rotated on a three-year cycle. The valuers
applied valuation methodologies consistent with
International Valuation Standards and Australia and
New Zealand Valuation and Property Standards, using
market evidence and property-specific inputs.
In determining a property’s valuation, the valuers
predominantly used two approaches to determine
the fair value of an investment property: the income
capitalisation approach and the discounted cash flow
approach to arrive at a range of valuation outcomes,
from which the valuers derive a point estimate. For
properties reported as under development, the residual
or land value approaches were also used.
We considered this to be a key audit matter due to the
significant estimation uncertainty involved, the size of
the balance, and the level of audit effort and judgement
required, including the involvement of an auditor’s
valuation expert.
Our procedures included, among others:
—Obtaining an understanding of management’s processes and
controls relating to the valuation of investment properties
through walkthroughs and discussions with management.
We also met with management and the independent
registered valuers to understand portfolio movements,
changes in market conditions, climate change-related risks,
and other factors influencing the key assumptions applied in
the valuations.
—Evaluating the appropriateness of the valuation
methodologies and the reasonableness of key assumptions,
including capitalisation rates, discount rates and market rents,
by benchmarking these against external market data and
recent comparable transactions.
—Holding discussions with the independent registered valuers
to understand the methodologies, estimates and key
assumptions applied in the valuations, and assessing their
competence, capabilities, and objectivity. We also evaluated
whether there was any evidence of bias in the determination
of significant assumptions used in the individual valuations.
—On a sample basis:
− agreeing forecast contractual rental income and lease
terms to executed lease agreements with tenants;
− evaluating whether property-specific factors,
such as capital expenditure requirements, seismic
considerations and ground lease obligations, had been
appropriately reflected in the valuations by inspecting
supporting documentation; and
− using an auditor’s valuation expert to assist us to
assess methodologies and assumptions, including
benchmarking selected inputs against market data.
—Evaluating whether the valuation approach applied for each
property was consistent with the valuation methodology
described in note 1 and suitable for determining the fair value
of the investment property portfolio as at 31 March 2026.
—Considering the appropriateness of disclosures made in the
financial statements.
PwCPwC
Financial Results
Goodman NZ
Annual Report 2026
ContentsYear in ReviewOur BusinessSustainabilityClimate-related DisclosuresOther Information
Independent auditor’s report (continued)
125124
The Directors of GNZL and GPS are responsible for the other information. The other information comprises the information
included in the Annual Report, but does not include the financial statements and our auditor’s report thereon. The Annual Report
is expected to be made available to us after the date of this auditor’s report.
Our opinion on the financial statements does not cover the other information and we will not express any form of audit opinion or
assurance conclusion thereon.
In connection with our audit of the financial statements, our responsibility is to read the other information and, in doing so,
consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the
audit, or otherwise appears to be materially misstated.
When we read the other information not yet received, if we conclude that there is a material misstatement therein, we are
required to communicate the matter to the Directors of GNZL and GPS and use our professional judgement to determine the
appropriate action to take.
The Directors are responsible, on behalf of GNZL and GPS, for the preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in
accordance with NZ IFRS and IFRS Accounting Standards, and for such internal control as the Directors determine is necessary to
enable the preparation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
In preparing the financial statements, the Directors of GNZL and GPS are responsible for assessing the Group’s ability to
continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern, and using the going concern basis of
accounting unless the Directors of GNZL and GPS either intend to liquidate the Group or to cease operations, or have no realistic
alternative but to do so.
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements, as a whole, are free from material
misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is
a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with ISAs (NZ) and ISAs will always detect
a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually
or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these
financial statements.
A further description of our responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements is located at the External Reporting Board’s
website at:
https://www.xrb.govt.nz/standards/assurance-standards/auditors-responsibilities/audit-report-ff-ff/
This description forms part of our auditor’s report.
This report is made solely to the shareholders of GNZL and GPS, as a body. Our audit work has been undertaken so that we
might state those matters which we are required to state to them in an auditor’s report and for no other purpose. To the fullest
extent permitted by law, we do not accept or assume responsibility to anyone other than the Group and the shareholders of
GNZL and GPS, as a body, for our audit work, for this report, or for the opinions we have formed.
The engagement partner on the audit resulting in this independent auditor’s report is Lisa Crooke.
For and on behalf of:
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Au
ckland
25 May 2026
Overview
Overall group materiality: $7.75 million, which represents approximately 5% of profit before tax excluding
movements in fair value of investment property and financial instruments (including the Group’s share
of earnings from associates arising from movements in fair value of investment property and financial
instruments) and movements in fair value of legacy employee benefits.
We have chosen this benchmark because in our view, it is the benchmark against which the performance
of the Group is most commonly measured by users of the financial statements.
We performed a full scope audit over the financial information of all components of the Group.
As reported above, we have three key audit matters, being:
—Valuation of investment property;
—Accounting for the corporatisation and stapling; and
— Determining the treatment for the investment in associates.
As part of designing our audit, we determined materiality and assessed the risks of material misstatement in the financial
statements. In particular, we considered where management made subjective judgements; for example, in respect of significant
accounting estimates that involved making assumptions and considering future events that are inherently uncertain. As in all of
our audits, we also addressed the risk of management override of internal controls, including among other matters, consideration
of whether there was evidence of bias that represented a risk of material misstatement due to fraud.
The scope of our audit was influenced by our application of materiality. An audit is designed to obtain reasonable assurance
about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement. Misstatements may arise due to fraud or error.
They are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic
decisions of users taken on the basis of the financial statements.
Based on our professional judgement, we determined certain quantitative thresholds for materiality, including the overall group
materiality for the financial statements as a whole as set out above. These, together with qualitative considerations, helped
us to determine the scope of our audit, the nature, timing and extent of our audit procedures, and to evaluate the effect of
misstatements, both individually and in the aggregate, on the financial statements as a whole.
We tailored the scope of our audit in order to perform sufficient work to enable us to provide an opinion on the financial
statements as a whole, taking into account the structure of the Group, the accounting processes and controls, and the industry
in which the Group operates.
PwCPwC
Materiality
Group
Scoping
Key Audit
Matters
Financial ResultsContentsYear in ReviewOur BusinessSustainabilityClimate-related DisclosuresOther Information
Goodman NZ
Annual Report 2026
Independent auditor’s report (continued)
127126
Jost
Highbrook Drive, Highbrook Business Park
GNZ BOND
ISSUER
LIMITED
Financial Statements
For the year ended 31 March 2026
The Board of GNZ Bond Issuer Limited, authorised
these financial statements for issue on 25 May 2026.
For and on
behalf of the Board:
John Dakin
L
aurissa Cooney
Chair Chair, Audit and Risk Committee
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(FORMERLY GMT BOND ISSUER LIMITED)
Financial Results
GNZ Bond Issuer Limited
Annual Report 2026
ContentsYear in ReviewOur BusinessSustainabilityClimate-related DisclosuresOther Information
Statement of comprehensive income 128
Balance sheet 128
Statement of cash flows 129
Statement of changes in equity
12
9
General information
13
0
Notes to the financial statements
13
2
1. Borrowings
1
32
2.
A
dvances to related parties
1
32
3.
A
dministrative expenses
1
33
4.
C
ommitments and contingencies
1
33
5.
Re
conciliation of profit after tax
to net cash flows from operating activities
1
33
6.
F
inancial risk management
1
33
7. Equity
1
35
Independent auditor’s report
13
6
129128
STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
For the year ended 31 March 2026
$ millionNote20262025
Interest income226.923.8
Interest cost
1(26.9)(23.8)
Profit before tax––
Ta x––
Profit after tax attributable to shareholder––
Other comprehensive income––
Total comprehensive income for the year attributable to shareholder––
BALANCE SHEET
As at 31 March 2026
$ millionNote20262025
Non-current assets
Advances to related parties
270 0.0 70 0.0
Current assets
Interest receivable from related parties9.3 9.3
Cash0.1 0.1
Total assets709.4 709.4
Non-current liabilities
Borrowings
170 0.0 70 0.0
Current liabilities
Interest payable9.4 9.4
Total liabilities709.4 709.4
Net assets––
Equity
Contributed equity
7––
Retained earnings ––
To t a l e q u i t y––
The above statements should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.
Financial Statements of
GNZ Bond Issuer Limited
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
For the year ended 31 March 2026
$ millionNote20262025
Cash flows from operating activities
Interest income received
226.9 21.6
Interest costs paid
1(26.9)(21.6)
Net cash flows from operating activities
5– –
Cash flows from investing activities
Repayment of related party advances–10 0.0
Related party advances made–(150.0)
Net cash flows from investing activities–(50.0)
Cash flows from financing activities
Proceeds received from issue of green retail bonds–150.0
Repayment of retail bonds–(10 0.0)
Net cash flows from financing activities– 50.0
Net movement in cash––
Cash at the beginning of the year0.10.1
Cash at the end of the year0.10.1
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
For the year ended 31 March 2026
$ million
Contributed
equity
Retained
earningsTo t a l
As at 1 April 2024–––
Total comprehensive income for the year–––
As at 31 March 2025–––
Total comprehensive income for the year–––
As at 31 March 2026–––
The above statements should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.
Financial Results
GNZ Bond Issuer Limited
Annual Report 2026
ContentsYear in ReviewOur BusinessSustainabilityClimate-related DisclosuresOther Information
131130
GENERAL INFORMATION
For the year ended 31 March 2026
Reporting entity
The financial statements are for GNZ Bond Issuer
Limited (the Company).
The Company was incorporated on 5 November 2009.
The address of its registered office is Beca House,
Level 8, 124 Halsey Street, Auckland. GNZ Bond Issuer
Limited is an issuer for the purposes of the Financial
Reporting Act 2013 as its issued green retail bond is
listed on the New
Zealand Debt Exchange (NZDX). GNZ
Bond Issuer Limited is a registered company under the
Companies Act 1993.
GNZ Bond Issuer Limited is a profit-oriented company
incorporated and domiciled in New Zealand. The
Company was incorporated to undertake issues of debt
securities with the purpose of on lending the proceeds
to Goodman New
Zealand Limited (GNZL) (previously
to Goodman Property Trust (GMT or Trust)) by way of
interest-bearing advances.
On 31 March 2026, unitholders in GMT approved the
corporatisation of the Trust which, in effect, became
GNZL. As part of the transaction, GNZL replaced GMT
as the borrower under the on
-lending arrangements
entered into by the Company in respect of each series
of
bonds on issue.
The transaction required approvals from holders of
bonds issued by the Company to amend the bond
documents and related arrangements to reflect the
new group structure. These amendments included
the novation of the relevant loan agreements, the
replacement of existing bond guarantees with
guarantees from GNZL and Goodman Property Services
(NZ) Limited (GPS), and consequential amendments to
the master trust deed, supplemental trust deeds and
security documents. Bondholder approval of these
amendments was obtained prior to completion of the
transaction.
The shares of GNZL and GPS have been permanently
stapled forming a new consolidated group (Goodman
NZ
or GNZ).
In connection with the transaction, and following approval
by bondholders, on 7 April 2026 the Company changed
its name from GMT Bond Issuer Limited to GNZ Bond
Issuer Limited on completion of the transaction.
Basis of preparation and measurement
The principal accounting policies applied in the
preparation of the financial report are set out below.
These policies have been consistently applied to all
periods presented unless otherwise stated.
The financial statements of the Company have been
prepared in accordance with the requirements of
Part 7 of the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013.
The financial statements have been prepared in
accordance with New
Zealand Generally Accepted
Accounting Practice (NZ GAAP), comply with New
Zealand equivalents to International Financial Reporting
Standards (NZ IFRS), other New Zealand accounting
standards and authoritative notices that are applicable
to entities that apply NZ IFRS. The Company is a for-
profit tier one entity for the purposes of complying
with NZ GAAP. The financial statements comply with
International Financial Reporting Standards Accounting
Standards (IFRS Accounting Standards).
The financial statements have been prepared on the
historical cost basis.
The financial statements are in New Zealand dollars,
the Company’s functional currency.
Significant estimates and judgements
Estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on
an ongoing basis. Revisions to accounting estimates are
recognised in the period in which the estimate is revised
and in the future periods affected. The Company has no
significant estimates or judgements that are applicable to
these financial statements.
Financial Statements of
GNZ Bond Issuer Limited
Material accounting policies
Interest income
Interest income from advances to related parties is
recognised using the effective interest method.
Interest cost
Interest expense charged on borrowings is recognised
as
incurred using the effective interest method.
Advances to related parties
Advances to related parties are recorded initially at fair
value, net of transaction costs. Subsequent to initial
recognition, they are carried at amortised cost using the
effective interest method.
Interest receivable from related parties
These amounts represent the value of interest income
recognised but not yet due for payment. They are
recognised at amortised cost using effective interest
rate
method.
Borrowings
Borrowings are recorded initially at fair value, net of
transaction costs. Subsequent to initial recognition,
borrowings are carried at amortised cost using the
effective interest method.
Interest payable
Interest payable represents interest costs recognised
as
an expense but not yet due for payment.
Financial risk management
Financial instruments are classified dependent on the
purpose for which the financial instrument was acquired
or assumed. Management determine the classification of
its financial instruments at amortised cost. Instruments
recorded at amortised cost are those with fixed or
determined receipts / payments that are recorded at their
expected value at balance date.
Changes in accounting policy
There have been no changes in accounting policies
made during the financial year.
Standards issued but not yet effective
The new and amended standards and interpretations that
are issued, but not yet effective, up to the date of issuance
of the Company’s financial statements are disclosed
below. The Company intends to adopt these new and
amended standards and interpretations, if applicable,
when they become effective.
NZ IFRS 18 Presentation and Disclosure in Financial
Statements. This standard becomes effective for
reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2027.
NZ IFRS 18 introduces new requirements on presentation
within the statement of comprehensive income, including
specified totals and subtotals.
Financial Results
GNZ Bond Issuer Limited
Annual Report 2026
ContentsYear in ReviewOur BusinessSustainabilityClimate-related DisclosuresOther Information
133132
Financial Statements of
GNZ Bond Issuer Limited
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the year ended 31 March 2026
1. Borrowings
1.1 Composition of borrowings
Carried atDate issuedMaturityInterest rate
2026
$ million
2025
$ million
Green retail bonds – GMB060Amortised costApr 22A p r 274 .74 0 %150.0150.0
Wholesale bonds – 8 yearsAmortised costSep 20Sep 282.262%50.050.0
Wholesale bonds – 10 yearsAmortised costSep 20Sep 302.559%150.0150.0
Wholesale bonds – 6 yearsAmortised costDec 21Dec 273.656%200.0200.0
Wholesale bonds – 5 yearsAmortised costO c t 24Oct 295.012%150.0150.0
To t a l
700.0700.0
1.2 Security and covenants
All borrowing facilities are secured on an equal ranking basis over the property assets of Goodman NZ. A loan to value
covenant restricts total borrowings incurred by Goodman NZ to 50% of the value of the secured property portfolio.
Goodman NZ has given a negative pledge which provides that it will not create or permit any security interest over its
assets. The principal financial ratio which must be met is the ratio of financial indebtedness to the value of the property
portfolio. Further negative and positive undertakings have been given as to the nature of Goodman NZ’s business.
All borrowings are classified as non-current with the earliest maturity being the green retail bonds in April 2027.
2. Advances to related parties
GNZ Bond Issuer Limited is a wholly-owned subsidiary of GNZL with GNZL being the ultimate parent. All members of
Goodman NZ are considered to be related parties of the Company.
2.1 Composition of advances to related parties
Carried atDate issuedMaturityInterest rate
2026
$ million
2025
$ million
Advance to GNZLAmortised costApr 22A p r 274 .74 0 %150.0150.0
Advance to GNZLAmortised costSep 20Sep 282.262%50.050.0
Advance to GNZLAmortised costSep 20Sep 302.559%150.0150.0
Advance to GNZLAmortised costDec 21Dec 273.656%200.0200.0
Advance to GNZLAmortised costO c t 24Oct 295.012%150.0150.0
To t a l
700.0700.0
2.2 Guarantee
Goodman NZ unconditionally and irrevocably guarantees all of the obligations of GNZ Bond Issuer Limited under its
Bond Trust Documents.
3. Administrative expenses
Goodman New Zealand Limited, the Company’s parent, paid all fees for audit services provided to the Company
(2026: $19,800, 2025: $19,200) and audit related services of reporting to the Supervisor (2026: $4,000, 2025:
$3,800). Agreed-upon procedures engagements included scrutineering fees of $24,000 in relation to the special
meetings of bondholders. There are no other services provided.
4. Commitments and contingencies
4.1 Capital commitments payable
GNZ Bond Issuer Limited has no capital commitments.
4.2 Contingent liabilities
GNZ Bond Issuer Limited has no material contingent liabilities.
5. Reconciliation of profit after tax to net cash flows from operating activities
$ million20262025
Profit after tax––
Movements in working capital from:
Interest receivable from related parties–(2.2)
Interest payable–2.2
Movements in working capital––
Net cash flows from operating activities––
6. Financial risk management
The Company is exposed to financial risk for the financial instruments that it holds. Financial risk can be classified in
the following categories; interest rate risk, credit risk, liquidity risk and capital management risk.
The Board has delegated to the Audit and Risk Committee of Goodman NZ the responsibility to review the
effectiveness and efficiency of management processes, risk management and internal financial controls and systems
as part of their duties.
6.1 Financial instruments
The following items in the balance sheet are classified as financial instruments: advances to related parties, cash,
interest receivable from related parties, borrowings and interest payable. All items are recorded at amortised cost.
Financial Results
GNZ Bond Issuer Limited
Annual Report 2026
ContentsYear in ReviewOur BusinessSustainabilityClimate-related DisclosuresOther Information
135134
Financial Statements of
GNZ Bond Issuer Limited
Notes to the Financial Statements (continued)
6. Financial risk management (continued)
6.2 Interest rate risk
Interest rate risk is the risk that the value or future value of cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate because
of changes in interest rates. The Board is responsible for the management of the interest rate risk arising from the
external borrowings.
To mitigate interest rate risk all advances to related parties have fixed interest rates receivable that match the fixed
interest rates payable on borrowings.
6.3 Credit risk
Credit risk is the risk of loss that arises from a counterparty failing to meet their contractual commitment in full and on
time, or from losses arising from the change in value of a trading financial instrument as a result of changes in credit
risk of that instrument.
The Company’s exposure to credit risk is limited to cash and deposits held with banks and credit exposure for the
advances to related parties.
The credit quality of financial assets that are neither past due nor impaired can be assessed by reference to external
credit ratings (if applicable) or to historical information about counterparty default rates. All financial assets are with
Goodman New Zealand Limited. Goodman NZ has a rating of BBB with S&P Global Ratings.
6.4 Liquidity risk
Liquidity risk is the risk that the Company will encounter difficulty in meeting obligations from its financial liabilities.
The Company’s approach to management of liquidity risk is to ensure that it will always have sufficient liquidity to meet
its liabilities when due, under both normal and stressed conditions, without incurring unacceptable losses or risking
damage to the Company’s reputation.
The following table outlines the Company’s financial assets and liabilities by their relevant contractual maturity date.
Values are the contractual undiscounted cash flows and include both principal and interest where applicable.
$ millionYe a r 1Ye a r 2Ye a r 3Ye a r 4Ye a r 5
Ye a r 6
and later
To t a l
cash flows
Carrying
value
2026
Cash
0.1 – – – – – 0.1 0.1
Financial assets
– Advances to related parties
26.8368.061.81 5 7. 81 51 .7–76 6.170 9.3
Financial liabilities
– Borrowings
(26.9)(368.0)(61.8)( 1 5 7. 8 )( 1 51 .7 )–(766.2)(70 9.4)
To t a l––––––––
2025
Cash
0.1 – – – – – 0.1 0.1
Financial assets
– Advances to related parties
26.826.9368.061.81 5 7. 81 51 .7793.070 9.3
Financial liabilities
– Borrowings
(26.9)(26.9)(368.0)(61.8)( 1 5 7. 8 )( 1 51 .7 )(793.1)(70 9.4)
To t a l––––––––
6. Financial risk management (continued)
6.5 Capital management risk
The Company’s policy is to match the value, term and maturity of external borrowings to the value, term and maturity
of advances made to related parties. This minimises capital management risk for the Company.
6.6 Fair value of financial instruments
The fair value of financial instruments has been estimated as follows:
$ millionFair value hierarchy20262025
Related party receivablesLevel 2669.8664.3
Green retail bondsLevel 1(151.4)(150.2)
Green wholesale bondsLevel 2(145.3)(14 6.1)
Wholesale bondsLevel 2(373.1)(368.0)
For instruments where there is no active market, the Company may use internally developed models which are usually
based on valuation methods and techniques generally recognised as standard within the industry. Some of the inputs
to these models may not be market observable and are therefore estimated based on assumptions.
The Company classifies its fair value measurements using a fair value hierarchy that reflects the significance of the
inputs used in making the measurements. The fair value hierarchy has the following levels:
—
L
evel 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
—
L
evel 2:
I
nputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either
directly (i.e. as prices) or indirectly (i.e. derived from prices).
—
L
evel 3: Inputs for the asset or liability that are not based on observable market data (i.e. unobservable inputs).
The fair value of wholesale bonds and green wholesale bonds, classified as Level 2, is measured using a present value
calculation of the future cash flows using the relevant term swap rate as the discount factor. The fair value of related
party receivables, classified as Level 2, is measured using the quoted prices of the green retail bonds liability, the fair
value of the wholesale bonds and the fair value of the green wholesale bonds.
The level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement is categorised is determined on the basis
of the lowest input to the fair value measurement. If a fair value measurement uses observable inputs that require
significant adjustment based on unobservable inputs, the measurement is a Level 3 measurement. All other financial
instruments fair value approximates carrying value due to short term nature (i.e. cash, interest receivable and interest
payable).
The Company’s policy is to recognise transfers into and transfers out of fair value hierarchy levels as of the date of the
event or change in circumstances that caused the transfer. During the year, there were no transfers between levels of
the fair value hierarchy.
7. Equity
As at 31 March 2026, 100 ordinary shares had been issued for nil consideration (2025: 100 ordinary shares for nil
consideration). All shares rank equally with one vote attached to each share.
The Company has tangible assets of $0.1 million (2025: $0.1 million), and its net assets are nil. Consequently, the net
tangible assets per bond at 31 March 2026 are nil (2025: nil).
Financial Results
GNZ Bond Issuer Limited
Annual Report 2026
ContentsYear in ReviewOur BusinessSustainabilityClimate-related DisclosuresOther Information
137136
To the shareholder of GNZ Bond Issuer Limited (formerly GMT Bond Issuer Limited)
In our opinion, the accompanying financial statements of GNZ Bond Issuer Limited (the Company), present fairly, in all material
respects, the financial position of the Company as at 31 March 2026, its financial performance, and its cash flows for the
year then ended in accordance with New Zealand Equivalents to International Financial Reporting Standards (NZ IFRS) and
International Financial Reporting Standards Accounting Standards (IFRS Accounting Standards).
The Company’s financial statements comprise:
—the balance sheet as at 31 March 2026;
—the statement of comprehensive income for the year then ended;
—the statement of changes in equity for the year then ended;
—the statement of cash flows for the year then ended; and
—the notes to the financial statements, comprising material accounting policy information and other explanatory information.
We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (New Zealand) (ISAs (NZ)) and International
Standards on Auditing (ISAs). Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the Auditor’s responsibilities
for the audit of the financial statements section of our report.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.
We are independent of the Company in accordance with Professional and Ethical Standard 1 International Code of Ethics
for Assurance Practitioners (including International Independence Standards) (New Zealand) issued by the New Zealand
Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (PES 1) and the International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (including
International Independence Standards) issued by the International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants (IESBA Code), as
applicable to audits of financial statements of public interest entities. We have also fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in
accordance with PES 1 and the IESBA Code.
In our capacity as auditor, our firm also provides review and agreed-upon procedures services. The firm has no other relationship
with, or interests in, the Company.
Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgement, were of most significance in our audit of the financial
statements of the current year. The Company obtains funds from the issue of debt securities and then lends the proceeds to
Goodman New Zealand Limited at the same cost. Given the nature of the Company’s operations, we have determined that there
are no key audit matters to communicate in our report.
PricewaterhouseCoopers, PwC Tower, 15 Customs Street West, Private Bag 92162, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand
T: +64 9 355 8000, www.pwc.co.nz
Overview
MaterialityOverall materiality: $269,000, which represents 1% of interest cost.
We chose interest cost as the benchmark because, in our view, it is the benchmark against which the
performance of the Company is most commonly measured by users.
Key audit mattersAs reported above, we have not identified any key audit matters from our audit. Refer to the Key audit
matters section of our report.
As part of designing our audit, we determined materiality and assessed the risks of material misstatement in the financial
statements. In particular, we considered where management made subjective judgements; for example, in respect of significant
accounting estimates that involved making assumptions and considering future events that are inherently uncertain. As in all of
our audits, we also addressed the risk of management override of internal controls, including among other matters, consideration
of whether there was evidence of bias that represented a risk of material misstatement due to fraud.
We tailored the scope of our audit in order to perform sufficient work to enable us to provide an opinion on the financial
statements as a whole, taking into account the structure of the Company, the accounting processes and controls, and the
industry in which the Company operates.
The scope of our audit was influenced by our application of materiality. An audit is designed to obtain reasonable assurance
about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement. Misstatements may arise due to fraud or error.
They are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic
decisions of users taken on the basis of the financial statements.
Based on our professional judgement, we determined certain quantitative thresholds for materiality, including the overall
materiality for the financial statements as a whole as set out above. These, together with qualitative considerations, helped
us to determine the scope of our audit, the nature, timing and extent of our audit procedures, and to evaluate the effect of
misstatements, both individually and in the aggregate, on the financial statements as a whole.
The Directors are responsible for the other information. The other information comprises the information included in the Annual
Report, but does not include the financial statements and our auditor’s report thereon. The Annual Report is expected to be
made available to us after the date of this auditor’s report.
Our opinion on the financial statements does not cover the other information and we will not express any form of audit opinion or
assurance conclusion thereon.
In connection with our audit of the financial statements, our responsibility is to read the other information and, in doing so,
consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the
audit, or otherwise appears to be materially misstated.
When we read the other information not yet received, if we conclude that there is a material misstatement therein, we are
required to communicate the matter to the Directors and use our professional judgement to determine the appropriate action
to
take.
PwC
Financial Results
GNZ Bond Issuer Limited
Annual Report 2026
ContentsYear in ReviewOur BusinessSustainabilityClimate-related DisclosuresOther Information
139138
The Directors are responsible, on behalf of the Company, for the preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in
accordance with NZ IFRS and IFRS Accounting Standards, and for such internal control as the Directors determine is necessary
to enable the preparation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
In preparing the financial statements, the Directors are responsible for assessing the Company’s ability to continue as a going
concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern, and using the going concern basis of accounting unless the
Directors either intend to liquidate the Company or to cease operations, or have no realistic alternative but to do so.
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements, as a whole, are free from material
misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is
a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with ISAs (NZ) and ISAs will always detect
a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually
or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these
financial statements.
A further description of our responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements is located at the External Reporting Board’s
website at:
https://www.xrb.govt.nz/assurance-standards/auditors-responsibilities/audit-report-ff/
This description forms part of our auditor’s report.
This report is made solely to the Company’s shareholder. Our audit work has been undertaken so that we might state those
matters which we are required to state to them in an auditor’s report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by
law, we do not accept or assume responsibility to anyone other than the Company and the Company’s shareholder, for our audit
work, for this report, or for the opinions we have formed.
The engagement partner on the audit resulting in this independent auditor’s report is Lisa Crooke.
For and on behalf of:
PricewaterhouseCoopers Auckland
25 May 2026
PwC
DHL Supply Chain
Highbrook Drive, Highbrook Business Park
GNZ Bond Issuer Limited
Annual Report 2026
ContentsYear in ReviewOur BusinessSustainabilityClimate-related DisclosuresOther InformationFinancial Results
Corporate governance 140
Remuneration report 152
Investor relations
1
69
GRI Index
17
2
Glossary
17
4
Business directory
17
5
OTHER
INFORMATION
Independent auditor’s report (continued)
Other Information
CORPORATE
GOVERNANCE
Introduction
Corporate governance is the system by which organisations
are directed and managed. It influences how an organisation’s
objectives are achieved, how its risks are monitored and
assessed, and how its performance is optimised.
The Boards of Goodman Property Services (NZ) Limited
(GPS) and Goodman New
Zealand Limited (GNZL, and
together with GPS, GNZ) have adopted an overall corporate
governance framework that is designed to meet best
practice standards. It recognises that an effective corporate
governance culture is critical to success.
At all times, the Boards of the companies strive to achieve
governance outcomes which effectively balance the needs of
GPS, GNZL and their subsidiaries, investors, regulators and
the wider market.
The governance section of the GNZ website contains all the
relevant policies, charters and other documents described in
this report.
GNZ and GNZ Bond Issuer Limited
On 7 April 2026, GMT changed its legal structure from
a managed investment scheme into a company. GNZL
replaced Goodman Property Trust (GMT) as a corporatised
version of GMT. The shares in GNZL were contractually
and constitutionally stapled to the shares in GPS to form
“Stapled Shares”, a single saleable security that trades on
the NZX Main Board under a single ticker code, “GNZ”. GNZL
and GPS were listed at the same time. Eligible unitholders in
GMT became Shareholders in GNZL and GPS. GNZL and
GPS are described on the NZX Main Board as “Goodman
New
Zealand Limited and Goodman Property Services (NZ)
Limited (NS)”.
In this report, a reference to “Stapled Shares” or “Shares” in
GNZ means:
(a)
p
rior to 7 April 2026, Units;
(b)
o
n or after 7 April 2026, Stapled Shares.
GNZ Bond Issuer Limited (previously named GMT Bond
Issuer Limited) (GMB) is a wholly owned subsidiary of GNZL
and special purpose financing company.
GMB has issued several series of fixed rate senior secured
bonds guaranteed by GNZL and GPS. As at 31 March 2026,
one series of green bonds is quoted on the NZX Debt Market
under the ticker code GMB060. GMB has no activities other
than those necessary or incidental to the issuing of bonds,
maintaining the bonds, on-lending bond issuance proceeds
to GNZL and complying with its obligations at law or under the
Listing Rules.
Relationship with Goodman Group
Goodman Group is GNZ’s largest investor, owning
approximately 31.9% of Units on issue as at 31 March 2026
(pre-corporatisation and stapling).
Following the completion of GMT’s corporatisation and
stapling on 7 April 2026, Goodman Group owned 31.9%
of
Stapled Shares on issue.
GPS and Goodman Group are also parties to the following
long-term agreements which were put in place on completion
of the Internalisation:
+A co-operation and services agreement for the provision
of certain investment management, information
technology, insurance, human resources, marketing,
treasury and risk services by Goodman Group to GPS;
and
+A
brand licence agreement, granting GPS a non-exclusive,
non-transferable licence to use the “Goodman” brand.
Goodman Group’s cornerstone investment and long-term
contractual arrangements with GNZ support close alignment of
interests between Goodman Group and other Shareholders.
On 30 September 2025, Goodman NZ Highbrook Limited
Partnership was established. Goodman Group is a co-investor
in Highbrook Business Park.
Goodman Group holds no bonds issued by GMB.
NZX Corporate Governance Code
GNZ is required to report against the NZX Corporate
Governance Code (NZX Code). The following section
assesses GNZ’s corporate governance framework against
the principles and recommendations set out in the NZX
Code as at 7 April 2026. Other than as identified below,
GNZ complies in all material respects with the principles and
recommendations set out in the NZX Code.
PRINCIPLE 1
Ethical standards
Code of Ethical Behaviour
The highest standards of behaviour are expected from the
Directors and employees of GPS. These expectations are
formalised in the following policies, practices and processes.
Induction training and regular refresher sessions are provided
to Directors and employees on these policies, practices and
processes.
Code of Conduct
The Code of Conduct establishes the standards of ethical
and personal conduct expected of Directors and employees.
It is consistent with the wider corporate values of GNZ and
compliance with the policy is a condition of employment.
The policy requires all Directors and employees to act with
honesty and integrity in a professional and respectful manner
and in accordance with the law. Directors and employees are
required to advise the CEO or General Counsel of any actual,
apparent or perceived conflicts, maintain confidentiality and
ensure proper use of non-public information.
In accordance with the Ethical Concerns (Whistleblower)
Policy, all Directors and employees are responsible for
reporting unethical or corrupt behaviour and GNZ will take
whatever disciplinary action it considers appropriate in the
circumstances, including dismissal.
Ethical Concerns (Whistleblower) Policy
This policy sets out the common principles and minimum
standards for the disclosure and investigation of improper
conduct. All Directors and employees are required to comply
with this policy.
Political Donations Policy
This policy sets out the procedure for the giving of gifts and
political donations. All Directors and employees are required
to comply with this policy.
Financial Products Trading Policy
This policy raises awareness about the insider trading
provisions in the FMCA and strengthens those requirements
with additional compliance standards and procedures which
Directors and employees who wish to trade in Stapled Shares
or Bonds must comply with.
GNZ imposes trading windows through this policy as well as
requiring written approval of the CEO or Chair prior to any
trade. Speculative trading is also prohibited with a minimum
holding period of three months imposed.
GNZ provides email advice of trading window status (and a
constant reminder to employees via the home page of GNZ’s
intranet site).
PRINCIPLE 2
Board composition and performance
Board Composition & Performance
The Boards of GPS and GNZL work with Management to
formulate and implement their strategy for GNZ, monitoring
their performance against set objectives. The Boards are
also responsible for ensuring business risks are appropriately
identified and managed and that the statutory, financial and
social responsibilities of GNZ are complied with.
The performance of the Boards is reviewed regularly with
such process being managed by the Chair. As part of the
review, the Boards assess if appropriate training has been
received by the Boards.
Board Charter
The Board Charter sets out the roles and responsibilities of
the Boards.
To facilitate the effective execution of its responsibilities,
the Boards have developed a schedule of delegations for
Management. This statement clarifies which matters are dealt
with by the Boards and which matters are the responsibility of
Management and includes areas such as finance, corporate
matters and property transactions.
A copy of the Boards’ approved mandate and Board
Charter can be found on GNZ’s website within the corporate
governance section.
Board Composition
The Boards of GPS and GNZL are identical and comprise six
Directors, with a majority being independent (as defined in
the Listing Rules). John Dakin and Gregory Goodman are not
considered independent due to their relationship with Goodman
Group. The Boards regularly review the independence of each
of the Directors, based on information provided by Directors.
The factors the Boards consider when determining the
independence of a Director, including the requirements of the
NZX Corporate Governance Code, are set out in full in the Board
Charter. Directors are expected to volunteer information as and
when it becomes available to them.
The biographies of the Directors can be found on page 28
of this report and online at: https://nz.goodman.com/about-
goodman/board-of-directors.
Directors have an average tenure of 10.2 years at 31 March
2026. They are encouraged to undertake training to ensure
they have the market knowledge and governance expertise
to perform their roles and duties, including completing the
continuing education requirements of the Institute of Directors
New
Zealand and other relevant professional bodies. Both
Gregory Goodman and John Dakin, as employees of Goodman
Group, also participate in, and have access to, training and
development opportunities provided by Goodman Group. Any
new Director receives a comprehensive induction that includes
a tour of GNZ’s assets.
All Directors are appointed for three-year terms, after which
they are eligible for reappointment.
14114 0
Financial Results
Goodman NZ
Annual Report 2026
GNZ Bond Issuer Limited
Annual Report 2026
ContentsYear in ReviewOur BusinessSustainabilityClimate-related DisclosuresOther InformationOther Information
PRINCIPLE 2 (continued)
Board composition and performance (continued)
Leonie has served on the Board for 14 years. The Board
recognises that extended tenure is a factor that may be
perceived to affect independence under the NZX Corporate
Governance Code.
Notwithstanding this, the Board has determined that Leonie
remains independent, having undertaken a comprehensive
assessment of all relevant relationships and interests.
In particular:
+L
eonie has no material business, financial or advisory
relationship with GNZ, management, or any substantial
shareholder that could reasonably influence their
judgement.
+The Board formally reassesses independence on
an annual basis and is satisfied that no interests or
relationships have arisen that would compromise
independence.
+The Board considers that Leonie’s market knowledge
continues to enhance Board effectiveness without
impairing independence, and that an appropriate mix of
tenure exists across the Board.
Accordingly, the Board is satisfied that the factor of tenure
does not give rise to a disqualifying relationship and that Leonie
continues to meet the definition of an independent director.
The Board Charter includes provisions relating to the
structure of the Boards and appointment of Directors.
The Listing Rules also apply in relation to the appointment,
rotation and removal of Directors.
There are written agreements with each Director setting out
the terms and conditions of their appointment.
Inclusion and Diversity
The Directors are engaged by GNZ. Employees are employed
by GPS.
An Inclusion and Diversity policy was originally adopted in
FY18 in respect of GMT and last updated in April 2026
following the corporatisation and stapling transaction. It
recognises that an inclusive and diverse culture provides a
greater variety of views and ideas that lead to better business
outcomes. Under this policy, GNZ undertakes to measure
gender, ethnicity, and age on a regular basis and to report
progress against future targets.
Strategies to broaden representation across the business
have delivered positive results, although with a stable team it
has been a graduated change.
The lower table shows the gender split between the various
business segments and compares this against the FY30
targets, included in the Inclusion and Diversity policy.
GNZ seeks to maintain a diverse Board for GPS and GNZL
with the appropriate mix of skills, gender and geographic
representation. Specifically in relation to diversity, GNZ has a
target of achieving greater than 40% female representation
on the Boards by 2030. As at 31 March 2026, of the six
Directors that comprise the Boards, two identify as female
and four identify as male. This is unchanged from last year.
PRINCIPLE 2 (continued)
Board composition and performance (continued)
Of the eight executives, three identify as female and five
identify as male. This has changed from last year. Included
in the group of eight executives are the three Officers of
the company, being the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief
Financial Officer and the General Counsel and Company
Secretary. All three Officers identify as male and this is
unchanged from last year.
Of the 71 people that make up the business, 49% identify as
female and 48% identify as male, 1.5% identified as ‘other
identity’ and 1.5% chose not to answer. 6% of our people
identify as being part of the rainbow community.
On average, a Goodman team member has been with the
business for eight years and ten months and is approximately
40 years old. It’s a team that includes 13 different ethnicities,
with speakers of 14 different languages.
The Chair and the Chief Executive Officer
As recommended by the NZX Code, the roles of Chair and
CEO are separated. This separation avoids concentrations of
influence and increases accountability. John Dakin is the Chair
and James Spence is the Chief Executive Officer of GNZ.
The NZX Code further recommends that an issuer has an
independent chair of the board. GNZ does not adopt this
recommendation, as John Dakin, who has been the chair
of the Board of GPS and GNZL (and previously, Goodman
(NZ) Limited in its capacity as manager of GMT prior to
the Internalisation) since 29 May 2023, is an employee of
Goodman Group and therefore is not an Independent Director.
This decision was made on the basis that John Dakin was
considered the best candidate for the role, due to his tenure
and expertise in the property sector and that the objectives
of the NZX Code are achieved by the Boards maintaining a
majority of Independent Directors and by the appointment of
David Gibson, Independent Director, as Deputy Chair.
Board Meetings
The Boards typically have four scheduled meetings a year,
together with a business planning and strategy meeting. In
addition, there are ad-hoc meetings as required.
During FY26, all Directors attended each Board meeting they
were entitled to attend, with the exception of Steve Jurkovich
who was an apology for the 12 February 2026 meeting and
Gregory Goodman who was an apology for the 26 February
2026 meeting. The Board had a 100% attendance record
in
F Y25.
The Independent Directors are encouraged to meet separately
when necessary and, in any event, not less than once a year.
They are also entitled to take independent legal advice at
GNZ’s expense should they believe it necessary to adequately
perform their role.
Company Secretary
The company secretarial function is performed by Anton Shead,
GNZ’s General Counsel and Company Secretary. Refer to
page
29 for Anton’s biography.
PRINCIPLE 3
Board committees
Board Committees
The Boards establish committees to assist in the exercise
of their functions and duties and to ensure that all risks are
effectively monitored and managed.
Audit and Risk Committee
The Audit and Risk Committee is a permanent committee
which meets four times per year and more frequently if
necessary. As at the date of this Report, the Audit and Risk
Committee only comprises Independent non-executive
Directors, being Laurissa Cooney (Chair), Leonie Freeman
and David Gibson. The Boards have determined that Laurissa
Cooney has an adequate accounting or financial background
as recommended under the NZX Code.
The Audit and Risk Committee operates under the terms of a
formal charter, a copy of which is available on GNZ’s website within
the corporate governance section. The duties and responsibilities
of the Audit and Risk Committee include the following:
+Reviewing with the external auditor the audit plan, their
evaluation of the system of internal accounting controls,
their audit report, and their management letter (if any) and
Management’s response.
+Reviewing the assistance given by Management to the
external auditor.
+R
eviewing and monitoring the scope and results of the
audit, its cost effectiveness, and the independence and
objectivity of the external auditor.
+R
eviewing and discussing with the external auditor any
suspected fraud, irregularity, or break-down of GNZ’s
internal controls or suspected infringement of any
law, rules, or regulations, which has or is likely to have
a material impact on GNZ’s financial performance, or
financial position, and Management’s response.
+A
pproving the annual plan and associated fees to be paid
to the auditor.
+C
onsidering and recommending to the Boards the
appointment or re-appointment of the independent
external auditor and matters relating to the resignation or
dismissal of the auditor and ensuring that the lead audit
partner is changed at least every 5 years.
+R
eviewing the half-year and annual financial statements
before submission to the Boards for approval and
overseeing the auditing and compliance of Goodman
NZ’s annual financial statements (including the financial
statements of GNZ Bond Issuer Limited).
+D
eveloping and monitoring related party procedures,
the internal audit programme, and arrangements by
which employees may raise concerns about financial
improprieties, and investigating certain matters.
+R
eviewing climate-related disclosures.
+R
eviewing corporate governance issues.
+A
dvising the Boards in relation to accounting, audit,
and
certain risk management matters.
The Boards during the year included:
BOARD COMPOSITION AT 31 MARCH 2026
1
NameClassification
Original appointment
to GPS Board
Original appointment
to GNZL BoardExpiry of current term
John Dakin (Chair)Non-executive Director1 July 201218 February 2026The date of the annual meeting of shareholders in 2028
Laurissa CooneyIndependent Director4 November 202018 February 2026The date of the annual meeting of shareholders in 2027
Leonie FreemanIndependent Director11 O c t o b e r 201118 February 2026The date of the annual meeting of shareholders in 2027
David Gibson
(Deputy Chair)
Independent Director2 February 202118 February 2026The date of the annual meeting of shareholders in 2027
Steve Jurkovich Independent Director1 July 202518 February 2026The date of the annual meeting of shareholders in 2028
Gregory GoodmanNon-executive Director23 December 200318 February 2026The date of the annual meeting of
s
hareholders in 2028
1
Independent Director Keith Smith retired from the Board of GPS on 25 July 2025.
DIVERSITY AND INCLUSION
Gender diversityTotal persons
Survey ResultsRepresentation Targets
MaleFemaleFemale
FY26F Y25FY26F Y25F Y30
Board66 6 .7 %6 6 .7 %33.3%33.3%>40%
Executive862.5%6 6 .7 %3 7. 5 %33.3%>45%
Managerial1369.0%63.6%31.0%36.4%>45%
Note: The proportion of male and female team members may not sum to 100% as individuals may identify as ‘other identity’ or choose not to answer.
14 3142
Financial Results
Goodman NZ
Annual Report 2026
GNZ Bond Issuer Limited
Annual Report 2026
ContentsYear in ReviewOur BusinessSustainabilityClimate-related DisclosuresOther InformationOther Information
PRINCIPLE 3 (continued)
Board committees (continued)
Management and other employees may only attend an Audit
and Risk Committee meeting at the invitation of the Audit and
Risk Committee.
Remuneration Committee
The Boards have established a Remuneration Committee,
which meets at least twice a year and more frequently if
necessary. As at the date of this Report, the Remuneration
Committee has a majority of Independent Directors, and
comprises David Gibson (Chair), Steve Jurkovich and
Gregory Goodman.
All Directors are entitled to attend the Remuneration
Committee meetings. Management and other employees
may only attend a Remuneration Committee meeting in
accordance with the Remuneration Committee Charter or at
the invitation of the Remuneration Committee.
The duties and responsibilities of the Remuneration
Committee include the following:
+Overseeing and reviewing the implementation of, and
recommending any changes to, GNZ’s remuneration
policy and practices, including for remuneration of
directors and employees.
+Reviewing and recommending to the Boards for approval
the design and structure of employee and executive
discretionary short-term incentive structure and equity
long-term incentive plans.
+Overseeing disclosure obligations in relation to
remuneration.
Nomination Committee
Nomination and appointment of Directors is managed by
the Boards. The Boards will, when they consider appropriate
(including to appoint a Director, whether as the result of a
retirement or otherwise), constitute a Nomination Committee
to consider and administer the relevant matter or appointment.
The conduct of the Nomination Committee will be governed
by a Nomination Committee Charter which will be produced
and agreed as required. A Nomination Committee was formed
during the period to identify and recommend a new director for
appointment. As previously announced, Steve Jurkovich joined
the Board from 1 July 2025.
Other committees
The Boards may from time to time establish other committees
for a specific purpose. These committees are ad-hoc
committees and the terms of reference for each committee
is agreed by the Boards as part of the establishment process.
Examples include:
+D
ue Diligence Committee
The Boards will typically establish a Due Diligence
Committee to oversee and report to the Boards on the
due diligence process for any transaction of a significant
size and/or complexity. Examples of such transactions
are major acquisitions funded by an equity raising or a
new issuance of bonds by GMB.
A Due Diligence Committee will usually include at least
one Independent Director, relevant external consultants
and members of Management considered appropriate
for the transaction in question.
+In
dependent Board Committee
An Independent Board Committee comprising the
Independent Directors will be established when considered
appropriate by the Boards. For example, an Independent
Board Committee was established to consider and
negotiate with Goodman Group the internalisation of
GMT
on behalf of Unitholders during FY24.
Takeover Protocol
GNZ has a Takeover Response Manual, which establishes
the procedure to be followed if there is an unsolicited offer or
approach by a potential acquirer for a controlling stake in GNZ,
including the procedure for any communication between the
Boards and Management, and the bidder, and establishment of
an independent committee to manage the response obligations
for the transaction.
PRINCIPLE 4
Reporting & Disclosure
Reporting & Disclosure
A fully informed and efficient market builds investor
confidence which ultimately contributes to the investment
performance of GNZ and its ability to raise capital.
GNZ is committed to keeping Shareholders, regulators and
other stakeholders fully and promptly informed of all material
information relevant to GNZ and GMB. GNZ has policies
and procedures that govern the behaviour of the Directors
and employees, ensuring balanced and timely information
is provided to the market. These policies can be viewed on
GNZ’s website in the corporate governance section.
Continuous Disclosure Policy
GNZ has a Continuous Disclosure Policy, which explains the
relevant legal requirements and sets out the procedures put
in place to ensure compliance with them.
Related Party Policy
GNZ believes that having Boards with a majority of
experienced Independent Directors effectively manages any
related party issues or conflicts that could arise.
A comprehensive Related Party Policy summarises the
relevant restrictions contained in the Listing Rules, the law
and relevant contractual commitments, and how these issues
are managed.
GNZ uses this policy as a tool to ensure that:
+M
anagement and the Boards are properly briefed and
educated on the relevant restrictions and the processes
put in place to ensure compliance with these restrictions.
PRINCIPLE 4 (continued)
Reporting & Disclosure (continued)
+Shareholders and the investment market recognise that
GNZ deals with related party issues in an appropriate,
transparent and robust manner.
Other reporting
Corporate reporting in recent years has extended to provide
a broader overview of the business, explaining how GNZ (and
formerly GMT) creates long-term value for all its stakeholders.
It includes additional information about GNZ’s investment
strategy and how its sustainability objectives are integrated
into the business.
For the financial year ending 31 March 2026:
+G
PS is a climate reporting entity in respect of GMT for the
purposes of Part 7A of the FMCA; and
+GMB is a climate reporting entity for the purposes of Part
7A of the FMCA, as a large listed issuer of debt securities.
In December 2025, the New Zealand Government
announced proposed changes to the climate-related
disclosures regime in Part 7A of the FMCA, including lifting
the threshold at which issuers of debt securities will become
climate reporting entities and removing fund managers from
the regime entirely. As a result of these proposed changes,
GNZ expects the climate-reporting obligations for both
entities to cease once the relevant legislation is passed.
Accordingly, both entities are relying on the Financial Markets
Authority’s “no action” relief and are not preparing mandatory
climate statements for the financial year ending 31 March 2026.
We recognise, however, that our stakeholders are interested
in our approach to climate change, and have accordingly
prepared voluntary climate statements for the period
ending 31 March 2026 in respect of the GNZ group on a
consolidated basis. To ensure that these voluntary climate
statements are most helpful for stakeholders, we have
prepared the climate statements by reference to the GNZ
group following completion of the corporatisation and stapling
transaction described on page 140.
Beginning on page 43, these climate disclosures include the
emissions inventory of the business, the three climate scenarios
we have evaluated, the risks and opportunities that have been
identified, the emission reduction targets that we have adopted
and the transition plan that has been developed.
Our disclosures are also available online as a separate,
standalone document here: https://nz.goodman.com/
sustainability/reports.
We have also included a comprehensive remuneration report,
see page 152.
Access to key governance documents
The governance section of the website, https://nz.goodman.
com/about-goodman/corporate-governance contains all the
relevant policies, charters and other documents described in
this report including:
+Constitution of Goodman Property Services (NZ) Limited
+Constitution of Goodman New Zealand Limited
+Constitution of GNZ Bond Issuer Limited
+Goodman Property Services (NZ) Limited and Goodman
New Zealand Limited Audit and Risk Committee Charter
+Goodman Property Services (NZ) Limited and Goodman
New Zealand Limited Board Charter
+G
oodman Property Services (NZ) Limited and Goodman
New
Zealand Limited Remuneration Committee Charter
+Building Materials Policy
+C
limate Resilience Policy
+Code of Conduct
+C
ontinuous Disclosure Policy
+Customer Footprints Policy
+E
mbodied Carbon Innovation Policy
+Ethical Concerns Policy
+F
inancial Products Trading Policy
+Health and Safety Policy Statement
+I
nclusion and Diversity Policy
+Modern Slavery Policy
+N
ature and Biodiversity Policy
+R
elated Party Policy
+R
emuneration Framework
+R
emuneration Policy
+Goodman Property Services (NZ) Limited and
Goodman
New
Zealand Limited Board Mandate
+P
wC Benchmark Report
Financial reporting
Effective management of all types of risk (financial and non-
financial) is a fundamental part of the GNZ’s business strategy.
GNZ maintains a risk management framework which includes
regular reporting to both the Audit and Risk Committee and
the Boards and the undertaking of an annual risk assessment
for GNZ.
Non-financial disclosure
Please refer to the sustainability section and the Climate-
related Disclosures within this report for GNZ’s non-financial
disclosure on environmental, economic and social sustainability
risks, measurement of those risks and risk management.
14 514 4
Financial Results
Goodman NZ
Annual Report 2026
GNZ Bond Issuer Limited
Annual Report 2026
ContentsYear in ReviewOur BusinessSustainabilityClimate-related DisclosuresOther InformationOther Information
PRINCIPLE 5
Remuneration
Remuneration
The Remuneration Committee has responsibility for
managing the remuneration of Directors and employees.
The FY26 Remuneration Report on page 152 details the
remuneration framework that has been adopted by GNZ
in respect of Directors, executives and employees and the
amounts paid by GPS during the year ended 31 March 2026,
including details of the nature and amount of each major
element of the remuneration of the CEO. By aligning individual
outcomes with the interests of GNZ and its Shareholders, we
believe the remuneration framework provides a transparent,
fair and reasonable structure.
Director remuneration was benchmarked during FY25 by
independent advisers, PwC. At GMT’s Annual Meeting of
Unitholders in July 2024, Unitholders approved an increase
in the fee pool available to directors from $815,000 to
$1,070,000. Following the corporatisation and stapling
transaction, this fee pool applies to the total remuneration to
be provided to Directors of both GNZL and GPS.
These remuneration practices and disclosures are compliant
with the NZX Code recommendations.
As no remuneration payments are made by GNZ Bond Issuer
Limited it does not maintain a remuneration policy.
PRINCIPLE 6
Risk Management
Risk Management
Effective management of all types of risk (financial and non-
financial) is a fundamental part of GNZ’s business strategy.
GNZ maintains a risk management framework that includes
regular reporting to both the Audit and Risk Committee and
the Boards and the undertaking of an annual risk assessment
for GNZ. Further detail in relation to this assessment is
provided below.
The Boards have the overall responsibility for ensuring that
risk is managed effectively. This includes consideration of all
material risks to the business. The Audit and Risk Committee
reviews the effectiveness of the risk management process,
including through the internal audit programme.
Risk register
The register identifies the material risks to the business,
assessing the impact and likelihood of each risk along with the
steps taken to mitigate possible adverse impacts. Climate,
compliance, financial, health and safety, operational, people,
regulatory, strategic and other risks are all considered.
Risk assessment
GNZ undertakes a comprehensive annual risk review process.
This process commences with an initial assessment being
undertaken by GNZ’s business risk function, which then
presents to Management for comment and review. The process
is intended to identify key risks to the business. Existing risks
are reassessed, and new risks considered during the review.
These assessments include consideration of the impact and
likelihood of each material risk, and the agreed mitigation
approach.
The outcome of the annual risk assessment process is
presented to the Boards for approval.
Management also engages external consultants from
time to time to assess, through survey and engagement
with key stakeholders, the key risks that are relevant to
GNZ stakeholders to ensure that GNZ understands the
perspective of all stakeholders.
Financial Risk Management policy
The Financial Risk Management policy reflects the Boards’
approach to managing financial risks. It includes policies,
controls relating to:
+L
iquidity risk
+I
nterest rate risk
+F
oreign exchange risk
+Counterparty credit risk
+O
perational risk
This policy is reviewed by the Boards annually.
PRINCIPLE 6 (continued)
Risk Management (continued)
Health and Safety
The health, safety and wellbeing of employees, customers,
contractors and the wider community is a business priority
of GNZ. GNZ maintains an Operational Committee and a
Leadership Committee with a focus on reducing harm.
Since the introduction of the Health and Safety at Work Act
2015, GNZ (previously GMT) has worked closely with the
Boards, staff and contractors to develop a culture of greater
safety awareness. The emphasis on proper processes,
vigilance and personal responsibility is consistent with the aim
of being free of serious harm accidents.
GNZ’s health and safety programme includes regular training
for all relevant staff.
Detailed reporting of health and safety incidents, including
trend analysis, is provided to management and the Boards on
a regular basis and used to identify and mitigate future health
and safety risks.
There were no serious harm accidents recorded in the last
financial year.
Further information on GNZ’s management and initiatives in
relation to health and safety is included in the sustainability
section of this report.
PRINCIPLE 7
Auditors
External auditor
The Audit and Risk Committee charter establishes a framework
for the issuer’s relationship with its external auditor.
Please refer to commentary under Principle 3 (Board
Committees) for the composition and duties of the Audit
and Risk Committee.
The Audit and Risk Committee ensures the quality and
independence of the external audit process. The Committee
ensures the annual audit is carried out independently and
without impairment, maintaining the credibility and reliability
of Goodman NZ’s financial reporting.
PricewaterhouseCoopers have been auditor of GMT since
FY04 and are now the auditor of GNZ. Lisa Crooke has been
the lead audit partner since FY23.
Annual meeting attendance
To maximise the effectiveness of communication at the
annual meeting, GNZ requires the auditor to attend the
annual meeting to answer Shareholders’ questions about the
conduct of the audit, as well as the preparation and content of
the independent auditor’s report.
Internal audit
The internal audit programme for GNZ is agreed annually by
BDO (as internal auditor), Management, and the Audit and
Risk Committee Chair, before being submitted to the Audit
and Risk Committee for approval.
The content of the internal audit programme varies from year
to year depending on the outcome of the risk assessment
process described in Principle 6.
The outcome of each internal audit review is presented to the
Audit and Risk Committee. Each member of Management
responsible for the area of the business in question is required
(at the invitation of the Audit and Risk Committee) to attend
the Audit and Risk Committee meeting to discuss the findings
of the report and respond to queries.
Any recommendations for improvement are discussed and
the responsible member of Management is required to agree
a timetable for the implementation of the changes. The
internal auditor reports back on implementation of the agreed
improvements.
14714 6
Financial Results
Goodman NZ
Annual Report 2026
GNZ Bond Issuer Limited
Annual Report 2026
ContentsYear in ReviewOur BusinessSustainabilityClimate-related DisclosuresOther InformationOther Information
PRINCIPLE 8
Shareholder rights and relations
Shareholder Rights & Relations
Ensuring investors are well informed and easily able to
manage their investment is a key priority of the GNZ’s
investor
relations team.
The Boards and GNZ encourage investor engagement
and facilitate this through regular communication (either
printed or by email) and meeting opportunities. GNZ’s
investor relations resource is responsible for delivering
this
programme. It typically includes:
+An annual meeting
+Investor tours and open days throughout the year
+Annual reports
+Live webcasts of the interim and annual result
presentations
+Regular institutional investor and analyst meetings
+Investor briefings
Information
The investor relations section of GNZ’s website is the
repository of important information about GNZ and GMB.
It includes NZX releases, financial result and meeting
presentations, reports and newsletters, and dividend
(previously distribution) histories. It also allows investors to
view current prices and link to the Registrar to check their
holding, update details and download forms.
Investors have the option of receiving communication in
printed or electronic format and live webcasting is provided
for the annual meeting and financial result presentations.
For
Shareholders and Bondholders who elect to receive a
printed copy, the Annual Report is typically mailed around
June of each year.
A dedicated toll-free investor line is also available for any
investment related queries, 0800 000 656
(+64 9 375 6073 from outside New
Zealand).
Transactions
No capital raising transactions were conducted by GMT
during the year ended 31 March 2026.
On 17 February 2026, GMT announced an on-market unit
buyback programme. Any units bought back prior to the end
of the trading day on 30 March 2026 were cancelled upon
acquisition.
A total of 8.1m units (pre-corporatisation) at a weighted
average price of $1.94 were purchased during the year
ended 31 March 2026. All relevant Capital Change Notice
disclosures under NZX Listing Rule 3.13.1 were made
accordingly.
Annual meeting of Shareholders
The Constitutions of each of GPS and GNZL require an
annual meeting of Shareholders every year. The Boards
encourage the participation of Shareholders at these
meetings to ensure accountability and familiarity with the
objectives of its investment strategy.
The next annual meeting is to be held later in 2026. Further
details will be contained in the Notice of Meeting.
When required, voting on resolutions is done by poll and
online proxy voting is provided for investors unable to attend.
Shareholders have one vote per Stapled Share they hold.
OTHER STATUTORY AND LISTING RULE DISCLOSURES
NZX Waivers
NZX has granted waivers to GMT, GPS, GNZL and GMB at
various times, some of which have been relied upon by GMT,
GNZL and GPS during the year ended 31 March 2026.
A complete copy of the waivers provided by NZX can be
found at www.nzx.com under the GNZ code.
GMT
Fund Establishment
On 29 May 2025, being the date a new capital partnership
with Mercer and Goodman Group was announced, NZ
RegCo granted GMT a waiver from NZX Listing Rule (Rule)
5.2.1. The implication of the waiver is to allow GMT to enter
into agreements with Goodman Group (a “Related Party” of
GMT, as defined under the Listing Rules), to effect the Fund
Establishment without having to obtain unitholder approval in
accordance with Listing Rule 5.2.1.
The purpose behind Listing Rule 5.2.1 is to provide
unitholders with the opportunity to consider, and vote
on, Material Transactions (as defined in the Listing Rules)
where there is, or may be a perception of, the potential for
undue influence by a Related Party on an issuer’s decision
to enter into a transaction or agree to its terms. In applying
for the waiver, GMT submitted that the policy behind Listing
Rule 5.2.1 is not offended by granting a waiver as the Fund
Establishment had been negotiated on arm’s length terms
and while Goodman Group is a Related Party of GMT,
Goodman Group has not influenced the terms of, or the value
of, the transaction, nor GMT’s decision to enter into it.
The waiver was granted on the following conditions:
(a)
the non-interested directors of GPS certify to NZX that:
i) the terms of the Fund Establishment have been
entered into, and negotiated, on an arm’s length
commercial basis;
i
i)
G
MT was not influenced to enter into the Fund
Establishment by Goodman Group;
(b)
t
he non-interested directors of GPS certifying to NZX that
the granting of the waiver is in the best interests of:
i
) GMT; and
ii) GMT’s unitholders who are not precluded from voting
under Rule 6.3;
(c)
t
he non-interested directors of GPS certifying to NZX
that the entry into the Fund Establishment is in the best
interests of:
i
)
G M T;
i
i)
G
MT’s unitholders; and
i
ii)
G
MT’s unitholders who are not precluded from voting
under Rule 6.3;
(d)
t
he non-interested directors of GPS including in the
certificate a summary of the core grounds of the
certifications given under each limb of conditions (a),
(b)
and (c) described above; and
(e)
t
he waiver, its conditions and implications being disclosed
in GMT’s next annual report.
Corporatisation and stapling transaction
NZ RegCo agreed that, in respect of the corporatisation and
stapling transaction, certain provisions of the Listing Rules will
not apply to GMT, or will apply in a different manner than is
usual for listed unit trusts.
NZ RegCo granted GMT a waiver from the provisions of Listing
Rule 2.10.1 (Transaction Waiver), to permit the then current
GPS Directors to vote on any resolution necessary to consider,
progress or give effect to the corporatisation and stapling
transaction and be counted in the quorum of any meeting of the
GPS Board for the consideration of such matters.
The Transaction Waiver only applied to the extent that a
GPS Director would be unable to vote because they are
“interested” in the corporatisation and stapling transaction,
solely due to being a director of GPS and/or a related
company of GPS and will become a GNZL Director if the
corporatisation and stapling transaction proceeds. GPS
Directors were not permitted to vote on matters related to
the corporatisation and stapling transaction in which they are
“interested” by virtue of a relationship or interest other than
their directorship of GPS or a related company of GPS or their
potential directorship of GNZL.
Additionally, the Transaction Waiver was granted on the
condition that the GPS Directors are only permitted to
vote on such resolutions as are necessary to put the
corporatisation and stapling transaction proposal before a
meeting of the Unitholders and, where Unitholders approve
the corporatisation and stapling transaction, give effect to the
corporatisation and stapling transaction.
GNZL and GPS
NZ RegCo agreed that, following completion of the
corporatisation and stapling transaction, certain provisions
of the Listing Rules will not apply to GNZ, or will apply in a
different manner than is usual for listed companies.
NZ RegCo granted GNZ waivers and rulings (Stapled Group
Waivers), which are, subject to conditions, waivers from, rulings
in respect of and approvals to amendments to, the following
Listing Rules in respect of the GNZ following completion of the
corporatisation and stapling transaction:
+A r
uling that, for the purposes of the definition of “Material
Information” in the Listing Rules, any reference to “Quoted
Financial Products of the Listed Issuer” shall be a reference
to “Quoted Financial Products of the Stapled Group” (with
“Stapled Group” being a reference to GPS and GNZL).
+A r
uling that, for the purposes of the definitions of
“Average Market Capitalisation” and “Average Market
Price” in the Listing Rules:
— a
ny reference to “Issuer” shall be a reference to
“Stapled Group”; and
— any reference to “Quoted Equity Securities” refers to
the Stapled Shares.
14 914 8
Financial Results
Goodman NZ
Annual Report 2026
GNZ Bond Issuer Limited
Annual Report 2026
ContentsYear in ReviewOur BusinessSustainabilityClimate-related DisclosuresOther InformationOther Information
OTHER STATUTORY AND LISTING RULE DISCLOSURES (continued)
+A ruling that, for the purposes of the definition of
“Disqualifying Relationship” in the Listing Rules, any
reference to “Issuer” shall be a reference to the Stapled
Group, in order to allow the Independent Directors of GPS
to also be Independent Directors of GNZL, as required by
the Listing Rules.
+A waiver from the provisions of Listing Rules 2.2 to 2.5
and 2.7 to 2.8 to permit:
— the GNZL Board and the GPS Board to be made up of
the same people;
— t
he GPS Board members to be deemed to be
appointed (or removed) if appointed to (or removed
from) the GNZL Board; and
— the GPS Board members to retire from the GPS
Board by rotation at the same time as they retire from
the GNZL Board.
+A ruling that, for the purposes of Listing Rule 2.11, any
reference to “Issuer” shall be a reference to GNZL or GPS,
so as to permit the pooling of director remuneration for
the Stapled Group and permit the approval of director
remuneration by either the Shareholders of GNZL or GPS.
+A w
aiver from the provisions of Listing Rule 2.10.1, to
the extent that a director of one stapled entity would be
unable to vote because they are “interested” in the matter,
solely due to being a director of the other stapled entity.
Directors will not be permitted to vote on matters in which
they are “interested” by virtue of a relationship or interest
other than their directorship of GNZL or GPS.
+A ruling that, for the purposes of paragraph (f) of the
definition of “Related Party” in the Listing Rules, the word
“Issuer” be interpreted as a reference to either GNZL
or GPS. In effect, this ruling permits GNZL and GPS
or their respective subsidiaries to enter into “Material
Transactions” as “Related Parties” within the Stapled
Group without requiring the approval of Shareholders.
+A r
uling that, for the purposes of Listing Rule 4.6.1,
any reference to “Employees” will be a reference to
“Employees” of any of GNZL, GPS or their respective
subsidiaries, so as to enable Stapled Shares to be issued
to any employee of the Stapled Group.
+A w
aiver from Listing Rules 3.13, 3.14 and 3.15 to permit
the Stapled Group to announce, via NZX, any issues,
acquisitions, redemptions, distributions, conversions and
calls in respect of Stapled Shares on a consolidated basis.
+A w
aiver from Listing Rules 2.14.1, 2.14.2, 7.8 and
7.9, to the extent required, such that GNZL and GPS
are not required to issue their own notices, reports and
communications to holders of their shares. Instead,
GNZL and GPS shall provide joint notices, reports and
communications to holders of the Stapled Shares as a
Stapled Group. Any notice, report or communication
which relates to only one of GNZL or GPS will clearly
explain which of GNZL or GPS is the source.
+A w
aiver from Listing Rules 3.5, 3.6, 3.7 and 3.8, to
permit the Stapled Group to provide the information
required in annual reports and half-yearly results
announcements on a consolidated basis. This waiver is
subject to the additional condition that GNZL and GPS
release financial statements of the Stapled Group with
any annual report of the Stapled Group and any other
financial statements required by the FMCA.
+A waiver from Listing Rule 8.3, to permit GNZL and
GPS to provide joint statements of shareholdings to
Shareholders which shows their Stapled Group holding.
Any statement which relates to only one of GNZL or GPS
will clearly explain which of GNZL or GPS is the source.
In addition to the conditions set out above, the Stapled Group
Waivers have all been granted on the additional conditions that:
+GNZL and GPS remain a Stapled Group;
+GNZL and GPS will each be given a “Non-Standard”
designation (NS Designation) upon the Stapled Group’s
listing and quotation (as those terms are defined in the
Listing Rules); and
+o
ffer documents and annual reports provided by the
Stapled Group will disclose the NS Designation and
include the implications of investing in the Stapled Shares.
As each share in GNZL is constitutionally and contractually
stapled to each share in GPS, the key implication for investors
is that the shares in GNZL and GPS must be acquired and
sold together.
The waivers and rulings of the Stapled Group Waivers which
relate to the directors and boards of GNZL and GPS are also
generally subject to the additional condition that at all times
the GNZL Board and GPS Board mirror each other.
GNZ Bond Issuer Limited
No waivers were relied upon during the period.
Register of Directors’ holdings as at the Balance Date
(to
31 March 2026)
The table below shows all relevant interests of Directors in
Stapled Shares and Bonds under the FMCA, which include
legal and beneficial interests in Stapled Shares.
Register of Directors Holdings
DirectorStapled SharesBonds
John Dakin (Chair)
1
2 ,70 3, 4 5 8Nil
Laurissa Cooney
2
58,872Nil
Leonie Freeman
3
4 0 8 ,75 0Nil
David Gibson
4
126,330Nil
Steipo (Steve) JurkovichNilNil
Gregory GoodmanNilNil
1
John holds his Stapled Shares through the SGH Investment Trust of which he
is a trustee and beneficiary.
2
Laurissa has a beneficial interest in 58,872 Stapled Shares through her
membership in the Craigs KiwiSaver Scheme.
3
Leonie holds a beneficial interest in 173,750 Stapled Shares through the
Wave Trust. She is a trustee of that trust. Leonie has an interest in a further
235,000 Stapled Shares held in her own name.
4
David has a beneficial interest in 126,330 Stapled Shares through his
membership in the Craigs KiwiSaver Scheme.
OTHER STATUTORY AND LISTING RULE DISCLOSURES (continued)
GNZ
Current Directors’ disclosure in addition to GNZL and GPS,
and any subsidiaries of GNZL and GPS are shown below.
During the year ended 31 March 2026, Directors disclosed
interests (indicated by (D) or cessation of interests (indicated
by (C)), in the following entities pursuant to section 140 of the
Companies Act 1993.
Laurissa Cooney
Air New Zealand (Director)
Le Rissa Limited (Director)
Rabobank New
Zealand Limited (Director)
Asia Pacific Village Holdings Limited (Director) (D)
Asia Pacific Village Group Limited (Director) (D)
MetlifeCare Limited (Director) (D)
David Gibson
F
reightways Group Limited (Director)
DG Advisory Limited (Director and Shareholder)
ALP Studios Limited (Director and Shareholder)
Contact Energy Limited (Director)
Harker Herbal Products Limited (Shareholder)
Arka Modular Limited (Shareholder)
Eat Shop Do Limited (Shareholder)
Gregory Goodman
T
rison Corporate Services Limited (Director and
Shareholder)
Nelson Trust Services Limited (Director and Shareholder)
Nelson Corporate Services Limited (Director)
Trison Management Services Limited (Director and
Shareholder)
Closeburn Station Management Limited (Shareholder)
Kingston Village Limited (Director)
Glen Nevis Finance Limited (Director)
Kingston Village Finance Limited (Director)
Trevally Finance Limited (Director)
Trevally Investments Limited (Director)
McCarthy Finance Limited (Director)
Glen Nevis Station Limited (Director)
Leonie Freeman
C
rest Consultancy Limited (Director and Shareholder)
Steipo (Steve) Jurkovich
Banking Ombudsman Scheme Limited (Director)
John Dakin
O
rmiston Surgical and Endoscopy Limited (Shareholder)
Other Disclosures for Goodman New Zealand Limited,
Goodman Property Services (NZ) Limited and
GNZ Bond Issuer Limited
Interests register
GNZL, GPS and GMB are each required to maintain an interests
register in which the particulars of certain transactions and
matters involving the Directors must be recorded. The interests
register is available for inspection on request.
Specific disclosures of interests
During the financial year, none of GNZL, GPS nor GMB
entered into any transactions in which their Directors had an
interest. Accordingly, no disclosures of interest were made.
Indemnity and insurance
In accordance with section 162 of the Companies Act 1993
and the constitutions, each of GNZL, GPS and GMB have
provided insurance for, and indemnities to, its Directors for
losses from actions undertaken in the course of their duties.
The insurance includes indemnity costs and expenses
incurred to defend an action that falls outside the scope of
the indemnity. The cost of such insurance has been certified
as fair by the Directors of each of GNZL, GPS and GMB (as
applicable). Particulars have been entered in the interests
register pursuant to section 162 of the Companies Act 1993.
Use of company information by Directors
No member of any of the Boards issued a notice requesting
to use information received in his or her capacity as a Director
which would not have otherwise been available to that
Director.
Donations
GNZL and GPS made total donations of $0.5 million during
the financial year. GMB did not make any donations during the
financial year.
Audit fees
All audit fees and fees for other services provided by
PricewaterhouseCoopers are paid by GNZ.
151150
Financial Results
Goodman NZ
Annual Report 2026
GNZ Bond Issuer Limited
Annual Report 2026
ContentsYear in ReviewOur BusinessSustainabilityClimate-related DisclosuresOther InformationOther Information
This has been a year of significant
progress for Goodman NZ. The transition
to a corporatised and stapled structure,
the establishment of our new funds
management business, and the full
implementation of our revised
Short-Term Incentive (STI) Framework
represent meaningful milestones
— and our remuneration outcomes
for FY26 reflect the performance
that underpinned them.
Remuneration Framework
The Board recognises the need to attract, retain, and
incentivise our people who deliver GNZ’s strategy, while
meeting the expectations of our stakeholders.
Prior to the commencement of FY26, the GPS Board
reviewed the STI Framework to enhance transparency and
strengthen the alignment between business performance,
individual performance and STI outcomes. The revised
framework was applied by the Remuneration Committee
in determining STI outcomes for FY26, with performance
assessed against a combination of financial, strategic and
individual measures, including:
+e
stablishing a new property funds management business;
+achieving portfolio performance across leasing targets;
and
+completing the transition of GMT to a corporatised and
stapled structure.
Full details of the FY26 STI scorecard, including the relevant
performance measures, weightings and outcomes, together
with the incentive paid to the CEO are set out on page 158
a n d 16 0 .
The GPS Board reviewed the CEO’s remuneration
arrangements during the year and determined that they
remained appropriate and aligned with the interests
of shareholders. No changes were made to the CEO’s
remuneration structure during the reporting period.
Cash earnings
Cash earnings is a key measure of the successful execution
of GNZ’s strategy and, therefore, employee performance.
It
is a performance measure in both the GNZ Long-Term
Incentive Plan (LTIP) and the STI
framework.
In February 2026, GNZ commenced an on-market share
buyback of up to NZ$125 million, with shares to be cancelled
upon acquisition.
The GPS Board obtained independent external advice on how
buybacks should be treated for remuneration performance
measures and after considering that advice decided not to
adjust the cash earnings measure for either the FY26 STI or
the legacy NZ LTIP vesting
in June 2026.
Going forward the Board will have discretion to adjust if it is
deemed appropriate to do so.
Committee membership changes
Following the retirement of Keith Smith in July 2025,
Steve
Jurkovich was appointed to the Remuneration Committee
in March 2026, bringing extensive remuneration governance
and financial services experience to the Committee.
Gender Pay Gap
We believe that a diverse team with different backgrounds
creates a more dynamic work environment. We set diversity
and inclusion targets to monitor and report on our progress.
A gender pay gap assessment was undertaken during the year.
Goodman NZ’s gender pay gap is 24.1%, which primarily reflects
workforce composition, including the distribution of roles across
the organisation, tenure, and representation at senior levels.
The Board and Management remain focused on improving
gender representation over time through targeted succession
planning, talent development and leadership initiatives, and
will continue to monitor and disclose progress annually.
Directors’ fees review
Non-executive directors’ fees were last reviewed in
July
2024. The next remuneration review will be considered
by the Remuneration Committee in 2027 and any
recommended changes will be proposed to shareholders
for
approval at the Annual Shareholder Meeting in 2027.
Looking ahead
Growth in GNZ’s property funds management platform,
together with increased active investment opportunities
provides opportunities for both our business and our people.
The Board remains focused on ensuring that remuneration
structure continues to support the attraction and retention
of talent with the skills and capabilities to deliver on an active
business strategy, while maintaining strong alignment with
shareholder outcomes.
On behalf of the Remuneration Committee, I am pleased to
present GNZ’s Remuneration Report for the financial year
ended 31 March 2026.
David Gibson
Independent Director and Chair of the Remuneration Committee
REMUNERATION REPORT
REMUNERATION
GOVERNANCE
Employees are employed by Goodman Property Services
(NZ) Limited. Accordingly, remuneration disclosures will be
made for GPS.
R
emuneration Committee
The Board has established a Remuneration Committee,
which meets at least twice a year. As at the date of this
Report, the Remuneration Committee has a majority of
Independent Directors, and comprises David Gibson (Chair),
Steve Jurkovich, and Gregory Goodman. David and Gregory
have been members of the Committee since its formation in
April 2024. Steve Jurkovich joined the Committee in March
2026, following the retirement of Keith Smith.
A
ll Directors are entitled to attend the Remuneration
Committee meetings. Management and other employees
may only attend a Remuneration Committee meeting in
accordance with the Remuneration Committee Charter or at
the invitation of the Remuneration Committee.
The duties and responsibilities of the Remuneration
Committee include the following:
+O
verseeing and reviewing the implementation of,
and recommending any changes to, Goodman NZ’s
remuneration policy and practices, including for
remuneration of directors and employees.
+Reviewing and recommending to the Boards for approval
the design and structure of the employee and executive
discretionary short-term incentive plan and equity long-
term incentive plans.
+Overseeing disclosure obligations in relation to
remuneration.
In FY26, the Committee convened three times, primarily
focusing on the implementation of the remuneration structure
and the outcomes of the 2026 remuneration review.
The Remuneration Committee operates under the terms
of a formal charter and has established a Remuneration
Policy for GNZ directors and employees, these are available
on Goodman NZ’s website https://nz.goodman.com/about-
goodman/corporate-governance.
Directors’ Securities Acquisition Policy
The Directors’ Securities Acquisition Policy requires
that within three years of appointment to the Board, an
Independent Director is expected to accumulate and hold a
stake in Goodman NZ with a value equivalent to their pre-tax
annual base fee.
Non-Independent Directors are employees of Goodman
Group and are considered aligned with the interests of
shareholders due to the investment in Goodman NZ by
Goodman Group, a substantial product holder, which has
resulted in the Director being deemed not Independent.
In the event that the base fees are adjusted at any time, the
Directors shall have a period of three-months from the date
of the adjustment to ensure their continued compliance with
this policy.
REMUNERATION POLICY
GNZ Remuneration Framework
Total remuneration for all permanent employees comprises
fixed remuneration, discretionary STI, discretionary LTI,
and
other benefits.
A
cross all levels there is a high weighting towards
performance-based and at-risk remuneration components
which are linked to the successful delivery of Goodman NZ’s
strategy. The performance hurdles for the Goodman NZ
LTIP are reviewed by the Board on an annual basis prior to
each grant, to ensure the hurdles are ambitious and require
significant financial performance for Goodman NZ before
any vesting to employees occurs. This structure drives strong
performance outcomes and aligns the interests of our people
with those of shareholders.
The weightings for each remuneration component for the
CEO, executives, and all other employees during the reporting
period are illustrated on page 154.
Fixed Remuneration
Fixed remuneration is determined with consideration of the
scope, complexity, experience, individual performance, and
market comparisons for individual roles. Fixed remuneration
is kept low relative to market on average and is reviewed
annually.
Short-Term Incentive
STI remuneration is a fully discretionary cash reward for
performance against performance objectives of the individual
employee, and Goodman NZ. In addition, employees must
meet behavioural expectations in line with Goodman’s values
and the Code of Conduct.
153152
Financial Results
Goodman NZ
Annual Report 2026
GNZ Bond Issuer Limited
Annual Report 2026
ContentsYear in ReviewOur BusinessSustainabilityClimate-related DisclosuresOther InformationOther Information
Short-Term Incentive (continued)
STI outcomes for the CEO during the reporting period
were determined with consideration of the achievement
of Goodman NZ’s strategy, the financial performance of
Goodman NZ outlined on page 18, and progress towards
sustainability targets outlined on page 35.
F
rom 1 April 2025, the revised STI framework has been
in place, providing a robust and transparent structure for
the GPS Board to recognise and reward performance with
a discretionary cash payment to eligible employees. All
potential individual STI outcomes are wholly discretionary
and reflect the achievement of business and individual
performance measures. The STI structure is detailed on
page
157 and the business performance targets and
weightings for the CEO and executives for FY26 and FY27
are outlined on pages 158 to 159.
L
ong-Term Incentive
The Board considers that the LTIP has been fundamental
in rewarding long-term performance and is a powerful
incentive and driver of operational resilience and retention
of talent. The establishment of Goodman NZ LTIP, in which
all permanent employees are eligible to participate, fully
aligns our people’s LTI outcomes with those of Goodman NZ
shareholders and remains a key component of Goodman
NZ’s remuneration strategy.
E
ligible employees are awarded performance rights, which are
a “right” to receive Goodman NZ Securities for nil consideration
or to receive a cash award (at the Board’s Discretion) if the
vesting conditions are met. The vesting conditions include
performance hurdles that must be met over a three-year
testing
period, with vesting in equal tranches, annually, from
the end of year three to the end of year five. The LTI will be a
material component of remuneration for all employees if the
hurdles are met or exceeded.
Remuneration Report (continued)
Remuneration Mix
The Board believes that the alignment between remuneration and long-term performance is evidenced by the significant
portion of total remuneration that is made up of LTI. The charts below illustrate the total remuneration for the CEO,
executives, and all other permanent employees and the significant weighting towards long-term and performance-based
remuneration outcomes. The information contained below comprises the outcomes from the remuneration review
undertaken during the reporting period and includes base salaries, discretionary short-term incentive paid (full-year
equivalent), and the vested value of the legacy NZ and GMG LTIP during the reporting period.
1
Base salaries paid in the year ending 31 March 2026.
2
STI paid in May 2025, reflecting the performance period. 1 July 2024 to 31 March 2025, and translated to a full-year equivalent STI for the purposes
of the annualised remuneration mix.
3
Based on the vested value of the legacy NZ and GMG LTIP in the year ending 31 March 2026.
CEO
REMUNERATION MIX
EXECUTIVE REMUNERATION
MIX AVERAGE
OTHER EMPLOYEE
REMUNERATION MIX AVERAGE
0%
13%
73%
14%
16%
69%15%
44%44%
12%
LT I vested
3
Base Salary
1
STI
2
A further grant of performance rights under the new
Goodman NZ LTIP was made in June 2025 (the FY26 grant),
being the second annual grant under the plan. The FY26
grant will be tested against the relative total shareholder
returns (TSR) for Goodman NZ compared with the total
shareholder returns of participants of the S&P/NZX50 and
Goodman NZ’s cash earnings per Share (EPS) over the
three-year performance testing period from 1
April 2025
to
31 March 2028. Further details relating to the performance
hurdles for the FY25 and FY26 LTI grants are outlined on
page 160 and page 161.
Currently 70 employees participate in the Goodman NZ LTIP.
Other Benefits
Employees are eligible for non-cash benefits which may
include life, total permanent disability, salary continuance,
and trauma insurances. Employees enrolled in KiwiSaver
received employer contributions of 3% on top of base salary,
and any discretionary cash STI received, increased to 3.5%
from 1
April 2026. Some employees are also eligible for a
car
park and company vehicle.
External Benchmarking
Benchmarking for all roles in the business was conducted
in late 2024. The Remuneration Committee intends to
undertake benchmarking again in 2027. All benchmarking
data will be extracted from comparator groups selected by
the Committee with a range of NZX comparators of a similar
size, complexity, and scale to Goodman NZ.
Remuneration timings
The chart below illustrates the three key remuneration components, the performance period the reward relates to,
and the timing each component is received by eligible employees. Prior to internalisation, the performance period
was
based on a July to June year, consistent with Goodman Group, the owner of GPS at that time. From 1 April 2025,
the performance period transitioned to reflect GNZ’s financial year April to March. The Goodman NZ LTIP performance
testing period and
vesting timings will be the same as the now legacy NZ LTIP.
Fixed
Remuneration
100% of fixed pay
(awarded in cash)
At-risk and performance based remuneration
STI
Performance period
(awarded in cash)
LT IPerformance period
(grant of performance rights)
75% of award tested against a cash
earnings per share hurdle over the three
year
performance testing period.
25% of award tested against a relative
TSR hurdle measured at the end of the
three year performance testing period.
34% of the LTI award (subject to the level
of achievement against the performance
hurdles and service requirements) vests
shortly after the end of year three.
33% of the LTI award (subject to the level of achievement
against the performance hurdles and service
requirements) vests shortly after the end of year four.
33% of the LTI award (subject to the level of achievement against
the
performance hurdles and service requirements) vests shortly
after
the end of year five.
F Y26Ye a r O n eYe a r Tw oYe a r T h r e eYear FourYear Five
155154
Financial Results
Goodman NZ
Annual Report 2026
GNZ Bond Issuer Limited
Annual Report 2026
ContentsYear in ReviewOur BusinessSustainabilityClimate-related DisclosuresOther InformationOther Information
REMUNERATION FRAMEWORK
BASE
SALARIES
K I W I S AV E R
AND OTHER BENEFITS
GNZ adopts a total remuneration’ approach where levels of f ixed remuneration are set
relatively low against the market, but variable pay delivered in the form of STI and LTI
rewards exceptional performance to strongly align our people’s outcomes with those
of
shareholders.
Base salaries are reviewed annually, and any changes are effective from - April each year.
Employees enrolled in KiwiSaver received employer contributions of -( on top of base
salary and any discretionary cash STI received. From ) April , employer KiwiSaver
contributions increased to -(. Permanent employees and those on f ixed-term
employment agreements over ) months are eligible for life, total permanent disability,
trauma and salary continuance insurances. Some employees are eligible for a car park
and company vehicle.
GNZ Long Term Incentive Plan FY-( Performance Hurdles
Cash Earnings per Share (EPS)
() weighting
Relative Total Shareholder Return
(TSR) -)
For the FY27 grant, this is GNZ’s cash
earnings growth of 4% to 8% CAGR
over the three-year performance
testing period.
Threshold level of performance 4%
CAGR in EPS (8.98 cps) – 10% vests.
5% CAGR in EPS (9.24 cps)
– 25% vests
7% CAGR in EPS (9.78 cps) 85% vests
Upper Level of performance 8% CAGR
in EPS (10.05 cps) – 100% vests
with straight-line vesting in between.
GNZ’s TSR compared with the total
shareholder returns of
participants of
the S&P / NZX50.
Less than 51st percentile – 0% vesting
At 51st percentile – 50% vesting
Greater than 51st percentile but less
than 90th percentile, straight-line scale of
satisfying the hurdle.
At 90th percentile or above 100% vesting.
FY27 Grant Testing period
1 A
pril 2026 to 31 March 2029
FY27 Grant Vesting period
1 J
une 2029, 1 June 2030,
or 1 June 2031 (or the next business day)
SHORT-TERM
INCENTIVE
Annual and
awarded in cash
LONG-TERM
INCENTIVE
Performance rights
are a “right” to receive
GNZ securities for nil
consideration if the
vesting conditions are
met. Vesting is subject
to the satisfaction of the
performance hurdles
over a three-year testing
period, with vesting in
three equal tranches,
annually, from the end
of year three to the end
of year five.
Overall Board discretion and cash earnings gate (90% of budget)
Maximum Potential
STI % base salary
Performance Pillars and Weightings (FY26 and FY27)
Business
Performance
Cash Earnings
per share to budget
Business
Performance
Strategic Objectives
Individual
Performance
Objectives
Chief Executive Officer110%50%50%–
Executives 55% to 120%30%30%40%
Other team members10% to 85%15% to 30%15% to 30%40% to 70%
At-risk and performance based remuneration
SHORT-TERM INCENTIVE FRAMEWORK
From 1 April 2025, the revised STI framework provides a
robust and transparent structure for the Board to recognise
and reward performance with a discretionary cash payment
to eligible employees.
Board discretion and gate
Under the framework, the Board maintains absolute
discretion as to whether to make an STI pool available, the
value of any payment or not to make any payment at all, even
if performance targets are met or not met. Achieving cash
earnings per share at 90% of the budget or above is the gate
to the establishment of a total STI pool, unless the Board,
at its absolute discretion, determines there are exceptional
circumstances.
STI Determination
All employees have a maximum potential STI based on their
role and band. The actual STI payable to eligible employees
under the framework will be determined based on the
level of achievement of business outcomes and individual
performance, with the weighting towards business and
individual performance determined based on bands.
For the CEO in FY26, the Board approved a maximum
potential STI of 110% of base salary, with 50% of the
maximum measured against cash earnings per share and
50% of the maximum measured against the achievement
of
strategic objectives.
Details of the achievement of the FY26 business performance
measures, including cash earnings and strategic objectives,
are outlined on page 158.
The Board has assessed the performance against the FY26
strategic objectives as solid performance, including:
+the establishment of a new property funds management
business;
+portfolio performance across leasing targets; and
+the transition of GMT to a corporatised and stapled
structure.
Details of the strategic objectives set by the Board for the
determination of the business performance pillar for FY27
STIs are outlined on page 159.
OVERALL BOARD DISCRETION AND CASH EARNINGS GATE
Business Performance
Cash earnings per share to budget
Business Performance
Strategic objectives
Individual
Performance Objectives
Cash earnings budget determined by the Board
each year.
Strategic objectives set by the
Board each year.
The level of achievement will
be determined by the Board at
the end of the financial year.
Objectives set each year and
measured as part of the end of
year
performance review process.
Achieved at or above budget
– 100%
Partially achieved at 97% to 99.9% of budget
– 75%
Not achieved at less than 97% of budget
– 0%
Outstanding performance
– 90% to 100%
Solid performance
– 80 to 89%
Partially achieved
– 0 to 79%
Did not meet – Nil
The portion of the STI outcome
measured by individual
performance will be determined
based on the individual
performance rating from the
annual
reviews.
157156
Financial Results
Goodman NZ
Annual Report 2026
GNZ Bond Issuer Limited
Annual Report 2026
ContentsYear in ReviewOur BusinessSustainabilityClimate-related DisclosuresOther InformationOther Information
SHORT-TERM INCENTIVE SCORECARD
FY26 Short-Term Incentive Scorecard
For FY26, Goodman NZ achieving cash earnings per share
at 90% of the budget or above is the gate for establishing an
STI pool. Cash earnings for FY26 were 7.98 cps, comfortably
exceeding the STI gate. The Board has exercised their
discretion to make a pool available. The STI quantum was
assessed based on the level of business performance and
individual performance.
The table below outlines the business performance metrics
and achievement levels for FY26. These metrics were used
by the Board to determine the level of payment for the
business performance component of the discretionary STI for
the CEO and other eligible employees for FY26 performance.
FY26 SHORT-TERM INCENTIVE SCORECARD
Business Performance
Cash earnings per share
to budget WeightingLevel of Achievement
Cash earnings
budget
CEO – 50%
Executives – 30%
Cash earnings were 7.98 cps, which
was 100.1% of the budget of 7.97 cps.
This results in 100% of the
portion of the STI measured
against cash earnings being
achieved.
Business Performance
FY26 Strategic ObjectivesWeightingLevel of Achievement
CEO – 50%
Executives – 30%
Portfolio
Performance
Occupancy averaged 97.7% across FY26 (96.9% at 31 March),
customer retention exceeded target at 69%, with arrears and NPI.
Solid performance – low
DevelopmentMt Wellington stage one redevelopment is underway and
resource
consent lodged for a 24MW/IT facility and stage one
Vector power connection underway.
Solid performance – low
Capital
Transactions
Bush Road was disposed of at 0.7% above book value and
Felix Street was acquired for $53.5 million.
Solid performance – medium
Funds and Capital
Management
All key fund targets were met or exceeded, including on-time
settlement
at $2.106 billion, with $365 million in external capital,
$860
million in debt funding.
Outstanding performance
FinancialS&P BBB/Stable rating reaffirmed and PIE status maintained.
Corporatisation and stapling completed.
Solid performance – high
People and safetyVoluntary turnover of 7.4%. Active
participation in health
and safety is on track.
Solid performance – medium
SustainabilityLighting and refrigerant upgrades reached 98% and 100%
completion, respectively and submetering 71% complete
or underway.
Solid performance – medium
The Board assessed the performance against the FY26 strategic objectives as solid performance, resulting in 84% of the
portion of the STI measured against strategic objectives being achieved.
FY27 Short-Term Incentive Scorecard
For FY27, GNZ achieving cash earnings per share at 90% of
the budget or above is the gate for establishing an STI pool.
Subject to the Board exercising their discretion to make a
pool available and the STI gate being met, the STI quantum will
be assessed based on the level of business performance and
individual performance. The table below outlines the business
performance metrics for FY27. These metrics will be used to
determine the level of payment for the business performance
component of the discretionary STI for the CEO and other
eligible employees.
FY27 SHORT-TERM INCENTIVE SCORECARD
Business Performance
Cash earnings per share
to budget WeightingLevel of Achievement
Cash earnings
budget
CEO – 50%
Executives – 30%
All other employees
– determined by band
Cash EarningsNot achieved
At less than 97%
of budget
Partially achieved
97% to 99.9%
of
budget
Achieved
At or above
budget
Potential STI
Outcome
0%75%10 0%
Business Performance
FY27 Strategic ObjectivesWeighting
CEO – 50%
Executives – 30%
Portfolio
Performance
Maintaining high occupancy and customer retention, while capturing underlying reversion and
cash
flow growth.
DevelopmentWhere appropriate, commence and execute on value-add developments within Goodman NZ.
Progress towards Goodman NZ’s data centre strategy.
Capital
Transactions
Deployment of capital opportunities, balancing disciplined acquisitions and disposals, and capital
management initiatives to support sustained earnings growth.
Funds ManagementStrengthen performance and positioning of the GNZ funds platform through effective execution,
active asset management, and development of future growth initiatives.
FinancialDisciplined capital allocation to optimise returns and maintain balance sheet strength.
People and safetyAttraction and retention of talent with the skills and knowledge to deliver Goodman NZ’s strategy.
Active participation in health and safety to enhance culture and strive towards safety excellence.
SustainabilityCompletion of core energy efficiency upgrades, progressing science aligned emissions pathways,
and solar.
159158
Financial Results
Goodman NZ
Annual Report 2026
GNZ Bond Issuer Limited
Annual Report 2026
ContentsYear in ReviewOur BusinessSustainabilityClimate-related DisclosuresOther InformationOther Information
REMUNERATION FRAMEWORK
Long-Term Incentive
Prior to internalisation, all permanent employees were eligible to
participate in the Goodman Group and NZ LTIPs. The obligation
for any vesting for these legacy plans is met by Goodman Group
(not GNZ). Continued employment is a condition of vesting, so
these schemes provide an employee retention benefit to GNZ.
A new Goodman NZ LTIP was established in 2024, ensuring our
people are now fully aligned to the strategy and performance of
Goodman NZ. Under the Goodman NZ LTIP, performance rights
may be granted to eligible employees on an annual basis at
the
discretion of the Board.
The key features of the Goodman NZ LTIP include:
1)
p
erformance rights are granted to eligible employees for nil
consideration;
2)
vesting is subject to the satisfaction of certain performance
hurdles and employment conditions;
3)
performance rights do not confer voting rights or the right to
participate in bonus issues or rights issues by Goodman NZ.
The Board has set a policy cap for the maximum potential
Performance Rights which can be issued and outstanding to
employees under the Goodman NZ LTIP, which equates to 3%
of
Goodman NZ Securities on issue.
There have been three grants made to eligible employees under
the Goodman NZ LTIP. As a result of these grants, 32.37 million
performance rights, which equates to 2.11% of securities on
issue as at 31 March 2026, is below the policy cap of 3%.
The performance hurdles, testing and vesting periods, and
quantum of each of the three grants are outlined in the table.
CEO REMUNERATION
CEO Remuneration
James Spence is the Chief Executive Officer of GPS.
The CEO’s remuneration comprises fixed remuneration,
discretionary STI, and participation in the LTI schemes.
The CEO’s remuneration arrangements reflect the Board’s
philosophy of keeping fixed remuneration low compared
to market and placing a stronger focus and weighting on
performance-based and at-risk remuneration components.
Whilst the CEO’s potential total remuneration is higher than
market, there is a substantial portion of remuneration linked to
the LTI grant, requiring significant performance by Goodman
NZ for maximum total remuneration to be achieved.
This section sets out the CEO’s remuneration arrangements in
FY26, LTI vesting outcomes, and FY27 remuneration structure.
The notice period for James Spence in
his role as CEO is
nine
months.
The total remuneration paid to the CEO during the financial
year comprises:
+Base salary of $500,000 unchanged.
+A cash STI of $386,720 paid in May 2025, reflecting
performance for the period 1 July 2024 to 31
March
2025 (nine-month transitional period).
+L
TI grant of 1,412,460 performance rights in September
2025, which equates to $2.74m face value based on
Goodman NZ’s five-day VWAP on 20 May 2025. Subject
to the level of performance against the hurdles, the FY26
LTIP grant will vest in three equal tranches in June 2028,
2029, and 2030.
+O
ther benefits include car park, insurances, and mobile
phone valued at $8,790.
+T
he CEO earned an STI of $506,000 for FY26
performance to be paid in FY27.
LONG-TERM INCENTIVE FRAMEWORK
EPS – 75% weightingRelative TSR – 25% weightingGrant DateTesting PeriodVesting Period Quantum
FY27Threshold level of performance 4% CAGR
in EPS (8.98 cps) – 10% vests
5% CAGR in EPS (9.24 cps) – 25% vests
7% CAGR in EPS (9.78 cps) 85% vests
Upper Level of performance 8% CAGR
in EPS (10.05 cps) – 100% vests
with straight-line vesting in between.
The relative TSR for GNZ
compared with
the TSR of
participants of the S&P/
NZX50 over the performance
testing
period.
The vesting of performance
rights tested against the
relative TSR performance
hurdle
will be based upon
the following formula:
+ Less than 51st percentile
– 0% vests
+
At 51st percentile
– 50% vests
+
At 90th percentile or
above – 100% vests
With a straight-line scale of
vesting in between 51st
and 90th percentile.
For the TSR portion of the
grants, GNZ
will need to
outperform half the participants
of the S&P/NZX50 over
the
performance testing period
for any
vesting to occur.
2 June 20261 April 2026 to
31 March 2029
1 June 2029 to
1 June 2031
The FY27 grant of 11.22 million
performance rights are
expected to be granted to
eligible employees equates to
0.73% of securities on issue as
at
31 March 2026.
With a five-day VWAP of $1.949
cents per Share at market close
on 22 May 2026 the face value of
this award was $21.9 million.
FY26Threshold Level of performance 5%
CAGR in EPS (8.74 cps) – 25% vests
Target Level of performance 6% CAGR
in EPS (8.99 cps) – 62.5% vests
Upper Level of performance 7% CAGR
in EPS (9.25 cps) – 100% vest
4 June 20251 April 2025 to
31 March 2028
1 June 2028 to
1 June 2030
As a result of the FY26 grant,
11.15 million performance rights
equates to 0.73% of securities on
issue as at 31
March 2026.
With a five-day VWAP of
$1.942
cents per Share at the
time of the grant, the face value
of
this award was $21.8 million.
FY25Threshold Level of performance 5%
CAGR in EPS (8.31 cps) – 25% vests
Target Level of performance 6% CAGR
in EPS (8.55 cps) – 62.5% vests
Upper Level of performance 7% CAGR
in EPS (8.80 cps) – 100% vest
September 20241 April 2024 to
31 March 2027
1 June 2027 to
1 June 2029
As a result of the FY25 grant,
10 million performance rights
equates to 0.65% of securities
on
issue as at 31 March 2026.
With a five-day VWAP of
$2.1158 cents per Share at the
time of grant, the face value of
this
award was $21.4 million.
CEO Remuneration Outcomes
The following disclosures relate to the actual remuneration
paid to James Spence for his time as CEO in the year
to 31
March 2026 and for one-year prior comparative
information. The STI paid to the CEO during each financial
year relates to performance during the year prior.
Prior to GNZ’s internalisation, the CEO participated in legacy
LTI plans designed to maximise long-term alignment with
shareholders of Goodman (NZ) Limited (NZ LTIP) and the
shareholders of Goodman Group (GMG LTIP). The following
explains how those grants were structured and the vesting
outcomes in
FY26.
Legacy LTIP Grant Performance Hurdles
Under the GMG LTIP, 25% of each grant was tested against
a relative TSR performance hurdle and 75% of each grant
against an EPS performance hurdle.
Under the NZ
LTIP 25% of each grant was tested against a
relative total unitholder return (TUR) performance hurdle
and the remaining 75% of each grant against an aggregate
operating earnings before tax per Unit (EPU) performance
hurdle.
GNZ Long-Term Incentive Plan Grant
The Board has made two grants to the CEO under the new
Goodman NZ LTIP since it was established. 25% of each
grant is tested against the relative TSR performance hurdle
and 75% of each grant is measured against a cash earnings
per share performance hurdle.
16116 0
Financial Results
Goodman NZ
Annual Report 2026
GNZ Bond Issuer Limited
Annual Report 2026
ContentsYear in ReviewOur BusinessSustainabilityClimate-related DisclosuresOther InformationOther Information
CEO Remuneration Arrangements for FY27
The Board has elected, in the interests of transparency, to
disclose in advance the structure and package that will apply
to the CEO for FY27.
Total potential cash-based remuneration includes KiwiSaver
of 3.5% on base salary and STI.
A grant of 1.38 million performance rights were made to
the CEO in June 2026. The face value of the FY27 grant
is $1.949 per Share based on the five-day VWAP on
22
May 2026.
The total potential remuneration for the CEO for FY27
comprises:
+$500,000 base salary, which remains unchanged.
The maximum potential STI for FY27 performance for James
Spence is 110% of base salary. The actual amount paid will
be determined in accordance with the STI framework, with the
business performance targets determining the STI outcome
for the CEO. The CEO’s potential STI for FY26 and FY27 is
110% of base salary.
CEO Remuneration Outcomes
The following tables detail the nature and amount of remuneration paid to James Spence in his position as CEO during the
financial year and the prior period for context.
$ million
Base Salary
$
Other Benefits
$
Short-Term Incentive paid
(cash) $
KiwiSaver
$
Fixed Rem +
STI paid+
KiwiSaver $
31 March 2026
James Spence500,0008 ,7 9 0
3 8 6 ,72 0
nine-month transitional STI26,6 02922,112
LT I Ve s t e d
G M G LT I PN Z LT I PTo t a l
Grant year and
tranche vested
Number of
performance
rights vested
% of
maximum
awarded
Market price
at vesting date
$
Number of
performance
rights vested
% of
maximum
awarded
Market price
at vesting date
$
Fixed Rem +
STI paid +
KiwiSaver +
LT I v e s t e d
$
31 March 2026
James Spence
2020
Tranche Three8,6 0788%54,83575%
2021
Tranche Two9,66710 0%AU D33.9894,22710 0%N Z D1.9168
2022
Tranche One31,4 679 4%342,45510 0%
To t a l 4 9,74194%4 91 , 51796%3 ,741 , 3 8 7
LTI vested in the period ending 31 March 2026 comprises 49,741 Goodman Group performance rights valued at
$1,877,135 on vesting date, based on the GMG market price of AUD33.98 and the AUD/NZD exchange rate of 1.1106 on
vesting date, plus 491,517 performance rights valued at $942,140 on vesting date under the NZ LTIP, based on the GMT
market price of $1.9168.
LT I A w a r d e d
Goodman NZ LTIP
Number of
performance
rights
Face value
per unit
1
$Testing PeriodVesting Period
31 March 2026
James Spence1,412,4601.9421 April 2025 to 31 March 2028
Three equal tranches
1 June 2028, 2029, and 2030
1
The face value of the FY26 LTI grant is Goodman NZ’s five-day VWAP of $1.942 per share on 20 May 2025, the date the Board approved the grant to the CEO.
The performance hurdles for the FY26 grant are outlined on page 160 of this report.
$ million
Base Salary
$
Other Benefits
$
Short-Term Incentive paid
(cash) $
KiwiSaver
$
Fixed Rem +
STI paid+
KiwiSaver $
31 March 2025
James Spence4 8 7, 3 0 87, 8 5 7550,00031,1191,076,28 4
LT I Ve s t e d
G M G LT I PN Z LT I PTo t a l
Grant year and
tranche vested
Number of
performance
rights vested
% of
maximum
awarded
Market price
at vesting date
$
Number of
performance
rights vested
% of
maximum
awarded
Market price
at vesting date
$
Fixed Rem +
STI paid +
KiwiSaver +
LT I v e s t e d
$
31 March 2025
James Spence
2019
Tranche Three9,38996%79,55698.5%
2020
Tranche Two8,6 0688%AUD33.3354,83475%NZD2.156
2021
Tranche One9,66710 0%94,22710 0%
To t a l 2 7, 6 6 295%2 2 8 ,6 1792%2,571,829
LTI vested in the period ending 31 March 2025 comprises 27,662 Goodman Group performance rights valued at
$1,002,647 on vesting date, based on the GMG market price of AUD33.33 and the AUD/NZD exchange rate of 1.0875 on
vesting date, plus 228,617 performance rights valued at $492,898 on vesting date under the NZ LTIP, based on the GMT
market price of $2.156.
LT I A w a r d e d
Goodman NZ LTIP
Number of
performance
rights
Face value
per unit
1
$Testing PeriodVesting Period
31 March 2025
James Spence1,296,4352.11581 April 2024 to 31 March 2027
Three equal tranches
1 June 2027, 2028, and 2029
1
One-day VWAP on 30 August 2024.
CEO POTENTIAL REMUNERATION FY27
Other
Benefits +
KiwiSaver
$
Maximum Potential STI
Total Potential
cash-based
remuneration
$
Goodman NZ LTIP Awarded
Total Potential
Remuneration
$
Base
Salary
$
Cash
$
% of base
salary
Number of
Performance
Rights
Face value
per unit
$
31 March 2027
James Spence500,00045,54 0550,000110%1,095,54 01,376,603$1.94 93,7 78 ,5 4 0
16 3162
Financial Results
Goodman NZ
Annual Report 2026
GNZ Bond Issuer Limited
Annual Report 2026
ContentsYear in ReviewOur BusinessSustainabilityClimate-related DisclosuresOther InformationOther Information
CEO OUTSTANDING PERFORMANCE RIGHTS
The table sets out the movement in the CEO’s performance share rights during the reporting period, including opening
balances, awards granted, lapsed, and vested.
LT I P l a n
Performance rights vesting and lapsed during FY26
Grant dateVesting Date
Opening
balance
31 March
2025
Number of
performance
rights vested
Market price at
vesting dateLapsed
Closing balance
31 March 2026
Goodman NZ
LT I P l a n
September 20241 June 20274 32,14 5––4 32,14 5
1 June 20284 32,14 5––4 32,14 5
1 June 20294 32,14 5––4 32,14 5
June 20251 June 2028470,820––470,820
1 June 2029470,820––470,820
1 June 2030470,820––470,820
To t a l 2,708,895–––2,708,895
LT I P l a n
Shares vesting and lapsed during FY26
Grant dateVesting Date
Opening
balance
31 March 2025
Number of
performance
rights vested
Market price at
vesting dateLapsed
Closing balance
31 March 2026
NZ LTI Plan
(legacy)
28 August 2020 1 June 202554,83554,835N Z$1.9168––
30 August 20211 June 202594,22794,227$1.9168––
1 June 202694,228––94,228
29 August 20221 June 2025342,455342,455$1.9168––
1 June 2026342,455––342,455
1 June 2027342,456––342,456
30 August 20231 June 2026363,986––363,986
1 June 2027363,986––363,986
1 June 2028363,987––363,987
To t a l 2,362,6154 91 , 517–1,871,098
Shares vesting and lapsed during FY26
Grant dateVesting Date
Opening
balance
31 March 2025
Number of
performance
rights vested
Market price at
vesting dateLapsed
Closing balance
31 March 2026
GMG LTI Plan
(legacy)
30 September
2020
1 September 20258,6 078,6 07AU D$33.98–
30 September
2021
1 September 20259,6679,667AU D$33.98–
1 September 20269,666–9,666
29 September
2022
1 September 202533,33331,4 67AU D$33.981,866–
1 September 202633,3331,86631,4 67
1 September 202733,3341,86631,4 68
29 September
2023
1 September 20263 7, 5 0 03 7, 5 0 0
1 September 20273 7, 5 0 03 7, 5 0 0
1 September 20283 7, 5 0 03 7, 5 0 0
To t a l 240,4404 9,7415,598185,101
REMUNERATION BANDS
The following table notes the number of employees or
former employees of GPS, not being directors of GPS, who,
during the reporting period, received remuneration and any
other benefits in their capacity as employees, the value of
which was or exceeded $100,000 per annum, in brackets
of $10,000. For the purposes of this table, remuneration
comprises base salary for the period, STI paid during the
period, LTI vested during the period, KiwiSaver contributions
and other contractual benefits including insurances,
allowances, car parks, company vehicle personal use, and
business fuel card personal use. The CEO is not included in
this table as his remuneration is detailed elsewhere.
REMUNERATION BANDS
Remuneration BandEmployees
$100,000 – $109,9993
$110,0 0 0 – $119,9993*
$120,0 0 0 – $129,9993
$130,0 0 0 – $139,9994
$140,000 – $149,9992
$150,0 0 0 – $159,9991
$16 0,0 0 0 – $16 9,9992
$ 17 0 , 0 0 0 – $ 17 9, 9 9 92
$180,000 – $189,9993
$190,000 – $199,9992
$200,000 – $209,9993
$210,000 – $219,9991
$220,000 – $229,9991
$230,000 – $239,9994*
$250,000 – $259,9992
$260,000 – $269,9991
$290,000 – $299,9991
$360,000 – $369,9991
$450,000 – $459,9992
$460,000 – $469,9991
$ 470,0 0 0 – $ 479,9991
$530,000 – $539,9991
$540,000 – $549,9991
$570,000 – $579,9991*
$670,000 – $679,9991
$730,0 0 0 – $739,9991
$740,000 – $749,9991
$76 0,0 0 0 – $76 9,9 9 91
$800,000 – $809,9991
$880,000 – $889,9991
$920,000 – $929,9991*
$930,000 – $939,9992
$970,000 – $979,9991
$1,580,0 0 0 – $1,589,9991
$2,030,000 – $2,039,9991
$2,080,000 – $2,089,9991
$2,110,0 0 0 – $2,119,9991
* One of these is a former employee.
16516 4
Financial Results
Goodman NZ
Annual Report 2026
GNZ Bond Issuer Limited
Annual Report 2026
ContentsYear in ReviewOur BusinessSustainabilityClimate-related DisclosuresOther InformationOther Information
DIRECTOR REMUNERATION
Director Remuneration Policy
The Directors are paid fees that reflect the responsibility of
governing Goodman NZ, implementing a strategy that creates
value for Goodman NZ investors.
Goodman NZ considers it desirable to attract and retain high
performing Directors whose skills and experience are well suited
to business requirements and reflective of market conditions.
The policy for Directors’ remuneration is an aggregate fee
pool which comprises a base fee for non-executive directors,
together with additional fees for the Chair of the board of each
GPS and GNZL (“Boards”, and each, a “Board”) and for the
Chair and members of the following Committees:
+Audit and Risk Committee
+R
emuneration Committee
+Ad-hoc Committees
The Boards determine the fees paid to Directors from the
approved aggregate fee pool. A copy of the remuneration
policy relating to Directors is available on the Corporate
governance section of the Goodman NZ website.
Directors fees were last approved at the 2024 Annual
Meeting, taking effect from 1 September 2024.
Following the corporatisation and stapling transaction, the fee
pool approved by unitholders applies to the total remuneration
to be provided to Directors of both GNZL and GPS.
VOLUNTARY DISCLOSURES
Gender Pay Gap Reporting
We believe that a diverse team with different backgrounds
creates a dynamic work environment. We build an inclusive
and psychologically safe environment where diverse thinking is
leveraged to identify risks and opportunities. We set diversity
and inclusion targets and monitor and report on our progress.
As part of this commitment, Goodman NZ is electing to disclose
the gender pay gap for our business.
Understanding our Gender Pay Gap
Goodman NZ defines the gender pay gap as the difference
between the pay of females and the pay of males. For the
purposes of this analysis, Goodman NZ calculates the pay gap
as the median male hourly rate less the median female hourly
rate, divided by the median male hourly rate.
Goodman NZ recognises that gender identity is diverse and not
limited to binary definitions. For the purposes of this disclosure,
the gender pay gap has been calculated using data voluntarily
provided by employees who identify as female or male.
There are three key drivers of Goodman NZ’s gender pay gap:
+The higher portion of males in our executive and managerial
roles, with long tenure at these levels which have higher
remuneration relative to individual contributors.
+A higher proportion of females in individual contributor
roles, which carry lower remuneration relative to senior
positions. Addressing this requires sustained focus on
development pathways and progression opportunities for
women across all levels of the business.
+Base salaries are determined with consideration of the
duties and responsibilities of each role, as well as the
incumbent’s experience, qualifications, and tenure. The
gender pay gap by level is influenced in part by longer
tenure, particularly among employees in senior roles.
The Chair is entitled to receive $210,000 per annum,
the Deputy Chair, $150,000 per annum, the Chair of the
Audit and Risk Committee $25,000 per annum and each
other Director $120,000 per annum. In addition, the new
maximum aggregate amount includes a pool of $150,000
from which Directors are paid $500 per hour for any time
spent in relation to ad hoc committees, such as due diligence
committees or a one-off project committees.
None of the Directors were paid performance related fees
relating to their directorships. Any amount of the pool which
is
unused is not carried forward to future years.
Gregory Goodman and John Dakin are remunerated by way
of salary paid by Goodman Group for their executive roles in
Goodman Group. Whilst entitled to Directors fees, they do not
claim any remuneration for their positions as Directors on the
Boards. Although Gregory and John do not currently receive
any Director’s fees for their roles on the Boards, an amount
is allocated for Director’s fees in relation to their positions
in the event that replacement Directors (or a new chair) are
appointed and choose to claim their Director’s fees, e.g. if
Gregory or John was not re-elected or needed to be replaced
due to illness or other incapacitation.
As no remuneration payments are made by GNZ Bond Issuer
Limited it does not maintain a remuneration policy.
Continued focus on improving representation and balance at
senior levels will lead to further reductions in future.
As part of our annual remuneration review, we review all our
remuneration data to ensure that we are maintaining our
commitment to pay equity. The following disclosure is based
on base salaries for our permanent and fixed-term employees
as part of the 2026 remuneration review.
Career Level
Workforce Demographic
Base salary
pay gap
FemaleMaleMedian
Executive43%57%39%
Manager 27%73%14%
Specialist 52%43%11%
Team members65%32%11%
Overall50%47%2 4 . 1%
CEO to Worker Pay Ratio
The pay ratio represents the number of times greater the Chief
Executive Officer’s remuneration is to the remuneration of an
employee paid at the median of all other employees. For the
purposes of determining the median, all permanent full-time,
permanent part-time, and fixed-term employees are included,
with part-time remuneration adjusted to a full-time equivalent.
As at 31 March 2026, the Chief Executive Officer’s base salary
of $500,000 was 4 times that of the median employee at
$128,000 per annum.
DIRECTOR REMUNERATION OUTCOMES
Details of the total remuneration paid to each director for the reporting period are as follows:
DirectorsBoard Fees
Audit and Risk
Committee
Remuneration
Committee
Ad hoc
committee fees
To t a l
Remuneration
Received
Laurissa Cooney120,00025,000–145,000
Leonie Freeman120,00010,000–10,000140,000
David Gibson150,00010,00010,00021,575191,575
Keith Smith70,0005,8754,37580,250
Steve Jurkovich60,0003 ,75 06 3 ,75 0
John Dakin–––––
Gregory Goodman–––––
To t a l520,00050,87518,12531,575620,575
Governance BodyPositionFee entitlement from 1 September 2024
BoardChair$210,000
Deputy Chair$150,000
Director$120,000
Audit and Risk CommitteeChair$25,000
Member$10,000
Remuneration CommitteeChair$10,000
Member$ 7, 5 0 0
Ad hoc committee roles$150,000
167166
Financial Results
Goodman NZ
Annual Report 2026
GNZ Bond Issuer Limited
Annual Report 2026
ContentsYear in ReviewOur BusinessSustainabilityClimate-related DisclosuresOther InformationOther Information
INVESTOR
RELATIONS
Introduction
Ensuring Shareholders and Bondholders are well informed and
easily able to manage their investment is a key priority of the
investor relations team. Regular meetings and communications,
its website and a dedicated toll-free contact number provide
investors with the means to make informed decisions.
Investor centre
Our website, https://nz.goodman.com enables Shareholders
and Bondholders to view information about their investment,
check current Share prices and view publications and
announcements.
Helpline
A dedicated toll-free number, 0800 000 656
(+64 9 375 6073 from outside New Zealand), will connect
Shareholders and Bondholders directly with the investor
relations
team who will assist with any queries.
Registrar
Computershare Investor Services Limited is the registrar
with
responsibility for administering and maintaining the Share
and Bond Registers.
If you have a question about the administration of your
investment, Computershare can be contacted directly:
+b
y phone, on their toll-free number 0800 359 999
(+64 9 488 8777 from outside New Zealand)
+ b
y email, to enquiry@computershare.co.nz
+b
y mail, to Computershare Investor Services Limited,
Private Bag 92119, Auckland 1142.
Complaints procedure
As a financial service provider registered under the Financial
Service Providers (Registration and Dispute Resolution)
Act
2008, GNZ Bond Issuer Limited is a member of the
Financial Dispute Resolution Service (registration number
FS P36625).
Complaints may be made to GNZ Bond Issuer Limited. If GNZ
Bond Issuer Limited is unable to resolve your complaint you
may refer it to the dispute resolution scheme.
Contact details of both are included in the corporate directory
at the end of this document.
16 916 8
Financial Results
Goodman NZ
Annual Report 2026
GNZ Bond Issuer Limited
Annual Report 2026
ContentsYear in ReviewOur BusinessSustainabilityClimate-related DisclosuresOther Information
SHAREHOLDER DISTRIBUTION As at 30 April 2026
Shareholding Range
Number of
Shareholders
Number of
Stapled Shares
1 to 9,9992,4271 1 , 1 3 7,7 0 4
10,000 to 49,9992 ,73 659,226,578
50,000 to 99,99938625,468,787
100,000 to 499,99925546,886,422
500,000 to 999,9991612,019,6 05
1,000,000 and above 371,375,872,177
To t a l5,8571,530,611,273
SUBSTANTIAL UNITHOLDERS As at 31 March 2026
It is a requirement of the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013
1
that each listed issuer makes available the following
information in its Annual Report.
Unitholder
Number of
Units Held
2
Goodman Funds Management Limited247,071,396
3
Goodman Investment Holdings (NZ) Limited 241,86 3,312
3
Accident Compensation Corporation84,378,208
1
The table is at 31 March 2026 balance date and therefore reflect Unitholders in GMT and reference Units (pre-corporatisation). The numbers of Units listed
above are according to our records and disclosures made under section 280(1)(b) of the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013. As these disclosures and
notices are required to be filed only if the total holding of a Unitholder changes by 1% or more since the last notice filed, the numbers noted in this table may
differ from those shown in the list of top 20 Shareholders at 30 April 2026.
2
The total number of Units on issue as at 31 March 2026 was 1,530,611,273.
3
Due to the breadth of the definition of ‘Substantial Product Holder’ in the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013 and the nature of Goodman Group’s
corporate structure, the list above requires Goodman Group’s holding in GMT (pre-corporatisation and stapling) to be shown through multiple entities each
holding differing (i.e. legal or beneficial) interests. The total holding of Goodman Group as at 31 March 2026 was 488,934,708 Units.
BONDHOLDER DISTRIBUTION As at 30 April 2026
GMB060
Number of
Bondholders
Number
of Bonds
1 to 9,99948264,000
10,000 to 49,9992595,302,000
50,000 to 99,999271,639,000
100,000 to 499,999224,686,000
500,000 to 999,99932,205,000
1,000,000 and above10
135,904,000
To t a l 369150,000,000
TOP 20 SHAREHOLDERS As at 30 April 2026
Rank Registered name Holding balance Percentage
1Goodman Funds Management Limited 247,071,39616.14
2Goodman Investment Holdings (NZ) Limited 241,86 3,31215.80
3BNP Paribas Nominees (NZ) Limited141,1 8 3 ,7 759.22
4Accident Compensation Corporation 102,324,8186.69
5HSBC Nominees (New Zealand) Limited 85,321,9125.57
6Custodial Services Limited6 1,7 76 , 4 0 74.04
7Apex Custodian Nominees (NZ) Limited6 0,699,8983.97
8Citibank Nominees (New Zealand) Limited 59,225,6383.87
9FNZ Custodians Limited 49,948,5553.26
10HSBC Nominees (New Zealand) Limited A/C State Street46,523,5243.0 4
11JPMorgan Chase Bank NA NZ Branch-Segregated Clients Acct 4 3,373,6 0 02.83
12Forsyth Barr Custodians Limited32,926,5812.15
13New Zealand Depository Nominee Limited2 3 , 2 9 7, 6 2 41.52
14HSBC Nominees A/C NZ Superannuation Fund Nominees Limited 23,023,2311.50
15BNP Paribas Nominees (NZ) Limited20,228,5101.32
16JBWere (NZ) Nominees Limited 18,572,3231.21
17Simplicity Nominees Limited 17,013,0 451.11
18Adminis Custodial Nominees Limited15,595,5361.02
19Generate Kiwisaver Public Trust Nominees Limited 1 2 , 9 2 7, 0 8 20.84
20PT (Booster Investments) Nominees Limited11,334,0050 .74
Stapled Shares held by Top 20 Shareholders1,314,230,77285.86
Balance of Stapled Shares held 216,380,50114.14
Total of issued Stapled Shares 1,530,611,273100.00
TOP 20 BONDHOLDERS As at 30 April 2026
GMB060
Rank Registered name Holding balance Percentage
1Custodial Services Limited42,397,00028.26
2HSBC Nominees (New Zealand) Limited 25,466,00016.98
3Forsyth Barr Custodians Limited16,144,0001 0 .76
4BNP Paribas Nominees (NZ) Limited15,34 4,00010.23
5Apex Custodian Nominees (NZ) Limited15,025,00010.02
6FNZ Custodians Limited 11,0 43,0007. 3 6
7Investment Custodial Services Limited3,279,0002.19
8Forsyth Barr Custodians Limited2,779,0001.85
9JBWere (NZ) Nominees Limited 2,277,0001.52
10Forsyth Barr Custodians Limited2,150,0001.4 3
11ANZ Bank New Zealand Limited 853,0000.57
12Adminis Custodial Nominees Limited807,0000.54
13NZX WT Nominees Limited 545,0000.36
14CML Shares Limited 450,0000.30
15Westpac Banking Corporate NZ Financial Markets Group 372,0000.25
16Forsyth Barr Custodians Limited360,0000.24
17Public Trust RIF Nominees Limited 355,0000.24
18Queen Street Nominees Ltd No.3354,0000.24
19Custodial Services Limited308,0000.21
20HSBC Nominees (New Zealand) Limited A/C State Street 300,0000.20
Bonds held by Top 20 Bondholders140,608,0009 3 .74
Balance of Bonds held 9,392,0006.26
Total of issued Bonds150,000,000100.00
Investor Relations (continued)
17117 0
Financial Results
Goodman NZ
Annual Report 2026
GNZ Bond Issuer Limited
Annual Report 2026
ContentsYear in ReviewOur BusinessSustainabilityClimate-related DisclosuresOther InformationOther Information
GLOBAL REPORTING INITIATIVE (GRI) INDEX
The GRI Standards are the world’s most widely used sustainability reporting standard. The GRI INDEX shows
where information can be found about the indicators that are relevant to our business operations.
GENERAL DISCLOSURES
Disclosure titleGRILocation or reference
Organisational details2-1Pages 84, 175
Entities included in the organisation’s sustainability reporting2-2Pages 44, 175
Reporting period, frequency and contact point2-3
1 April 2025 to 31 March 2026
Annual
info-nz@goodman.com
Restatements of information2- 4Pa ge 67
External assurance2-5Pa ge 75
Activities, value chain and other business relationships2-6
https://nz.goodman.com/who-we-are/about-us
P a g e s 22-27, 4 3, 112-113
Employees2-7P a g e s 38-39, 142-14 3
Workers who are not employees2-8We have workers who are independent contractors
Governance structure and composition2-9Pages 28-29, 140-144
Nomination and selection of the highest governance body2-1 0
P a g e s 141-14 4
https://nz.goodman.com/about-goodman/
corporate-governance
Chair of the highest governance body2-11Pa ge 28
Role of the highest governance body in overseeing
the
management of impacts
2-1 2Pages 44-45
Delegation of responsibility for managing impacts2-1 3Pages 44-45
Role of the highest governance body in sustainability reporting2-14Pages 44-45
Conflicts of interest2-1 5P a g e s 141, 14 4 -15 0
Communication of critical concerns2-16Regular Board reporting from the Health
and
Safety committee
Collective knowledge of the highest governance body2-17P a g e 141
Evaluation of the performance of the highest governance body2-1 8P a g e s 3 4 -39, 141-14 4
Remuneration policies2-1 9Pages 64, 152-167
Process to determine remuneration2-20P a g e s 1 5 2 -1 6 7
Annual total compensation ratio2-21P a g e 166
Statement on sustainable development strategy2-22Pages 34-35, 54
Policy commitments2-23P a g e s 47- 5 4 , 141-14 4
Embedding policy commitments2-24Pages 38-39, 46-47
Processes to remediate negative impacts2-25Pages 34-35, 54
Mechanisms for seeking advice and raising concerns2-26
Ethical Concerns (Whistleblower) Policy,
https://nz.goodman.com/about-goodman/
corporate-governance
Compliance with laws and regulations2-27No non-compliance
Membership associations2-28Page 36
Approach to stakeholder engagement2-29Pages 32-33, 36-37
Collective bargaining agreements2-30No collective agreements, all employees are
on
individual employment agreements
TOPIC SPECIFIC DISCLOSURES
Disclosure titleGRILocation or reference
Material Topics
Process to determine material topics3 -1P a g e s 32-33
List of material topics3-2Pages 32-33
Biodiversity
Disclosure on management approach3-3P a g e s 22-23, 34 -35
Management of biodiversity impacts101-2 Page 53
Energy
Disclosure on management approach3-3Pages 34-35, 54-63
Energy intensity302-3Page 60
Emissions
Disclosure on management approach3-3Pages 34-35, 54-63
GHG emissions intensity305-4Page 60
Occupational health & safety
Disclosure on management approach3-3Pages 38-39, 146-147
Work related injuries403-9 Page 38
Diversity and equal opportunity
Disclosure on management approach3-3Pages 38-39
Diversity of governance bodies and employees4 0 5 -1P a g e s 141-14 4
Sustainable design and management – non GRI
Disclosure on management approach3-3P a g e s 32-35
Customer attraction and retention – non GRI
Disclosure on management approach3-3Pages 32-35, 36-37
Flexible, adaptable and resilient properties – non GRI
Disclosure on management approach3-3Pages 32-35, 54
Social equity – non GRI
Disclosure on management approach3-3Pages 32-33, 38-39, 40-41
Sustainable structure, operations and results – non GRI
Disclosure on management approach3-3Pages 32-33, 36-37
Responsible and environmentally sensitive investment – non GRI
Disclosure on management approach 3-3Pages 32-33, 36-37, 54
ESG reporting and stakeholder engagement – non GRI
Disclosure on management approach3-3Pages 32-33, 36-37
Goodman NZ has chosen to prepare its Annual Report in accordance with the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Universal Standards.
17 317 2
Financial Results
Goodman NZ
Annual Report 2026
GNZ Bond Issuer Limited
Annual Report 2026
ContentsYear in ReviewOur BusinessSustainabilityClimate-related DisclosuresOther InformationOther Information
$ and cents
New Zealand currency.
AUM
Assets Under Management
Balance date
31 March 2026.
Board
(a)
prior to 7 April 2026, the Board of Directors of GPS
(in its capacity as manager of GMT) and/or GMB
(as
applicable); and
(b) on or after 7 April 2026,the Board of Directors of
GNZL, GPS and/or GMB (as applicable),and “GNZL
Board”
and “GPS Board” have corresponding meanings.
Bond
a bond issued by GMB.
Bondholder
a person whose name is recorded in the Bond register
as
a holder of a Bond.
Cash earnings
Cash earnings is a non-GAAP measure that assesses
free cash flow, on a per share basis, after adjusting for
certain items. Calculation of GNZ’s cash earnings is set
out on page 18.
Capex
Capital expenditure to acquire, upgrade, or extend the
life of property assets
CEO
Chief Executive Officer of GNZ.
CFO
Chief Financial Officer of GNZ.
Chair
the Chair of the Board of GNZL, GPS and/or GMB
(as
applicable).
Core Portfolio
those estates within the Total Portfolio which largely
consist of modern, high quality warehouse and logistics
properties.
Corporatisation
On 7 April 2026, GMT changed its legal structure from
a managed investment scheme into a company. GNZL
replaced GMT as a corporatised version of
GMT.
cps
cents per share.
CRE
Climate Reporting Entity.
Embodied carbon
total carbon emissions involved in the creation of a
building including extraction of materials from the
ground, transport, refining, processing and construction.
Director
(a)
prior to 7 April 2026, a director of GPS (in its capacity
as manager of GMT) and/or GMB (as applicable); and
(b) on or after 7 April 2026, a director of GNZL, GPS
and/or GMB (as applicable).
ESG
Environmental, Social, Governance.
Executives or Management
the senior executives of GNZ.
Fund Establishment
The establishment of the Highbrook Partnership.
FMCA
Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013.
Funds management
The management of third-party property funds.
FY
Financial Year.
GHG Protocol
a Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard and
Greenhouse Gas
Protocol: Corporate Value Chain
(Scope 3) Accounting and Reporting Standard.
GIT
Goodman Industrial Trust and its controlled entities,
as the context requires.
GL
Goodman Limited and its controlled entities, as
the context requires.
GMB
GNZ Bond Issuer Limited (formerly GMT Bond Issuer
Limited), is a wholly owned subsidiary of Goodman
New Zealand Limited.
GMT
Goodman Property Trust, which was a listed property
trust.
Goodman NZ or GNZ
The stapled group comprising GNZL and GPS together,
and subsidiaries of GNZL and GPS.
Goodman Group or GMG
means Goodman Limited, Goodman Funds Management
Limited as responsible entity for GIT, Goodman Logistics
(HK) Limited and each of their respective related entities,
operating together as a stapled group.
Goodman (NZ) Limited or GNZ
the former Manager of GMT prior to Internalisation.
GNZL
Goodman New Zealand Limited
GPS
Goodman Property Services (NZ) Limited
Green Star
Green Star is a voluntary sustainability rating system
for non-residential buildings, fitouts and
communities.
Administered by the NZGBC, the system provides
a rating of up to six stars based on a
building’s key
sustainability credentials.
GRI
Global Reporting Initiative.
GWP
Global Warming Potential is a measure of how much heat
a greenhouse gas traps in the atmosphere over a given
time period, relative to carbon dioxide.
Highbrook Partnership or HLP
Goodman NZ Highbrook Limited Partnership.
H VAC
Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning.
Independent Director
has the meaning given to that term in the Listing Rules
which, for GNZL, GPS, together GNZ, are those
persons
listed on the following page.
Internalisation
means the internalisation approved by GMT Unitholders
at the Special Meeting held on 26 March 2024.
ISO
International Organisation for Standardisation.
I SO 14064-1:2018
standard for quantification and reporting of greenhouse
gas emissions and removals.
kgCO
2
e
Kilogrammes of Carbon Dioxide Equivalent.
KPI
Key Performance Indicators.
LED
Light Emitting Diode.
Listing Rules
The Listing Rules dated 31
January 2025 and ‘LR’
is
a reference to any of those rules.
Loan to value ratio or LVR
Loan to value ratio is a non-GAAP financial measure
used to assess the strength of GNZ’s balance sheet.
The
loan amount in this measure is net of cash and
short-term deposits.
M VA
Mega Volt-Amperes.
MWh
Megawatt hours.
MWp
Megawatt peak.
NGFS
Network for Greening the Financial System.
NLA
Net Lettable Area.
N TA
net tangible assets includes the value of investments
in associates.
NZ IFRS
New
Zealand equivalents to International Financial
Reporting Standards.
NZDX
the New
Zealand debt market operated by NZX.
NZGBC
New
Zealand Green Building Council.
NZ RegCo
NZX Regulation Limited.
NZX
means NZX Limited.
NZX Code
means the NZX Corporate Governance Code dated
31
January 2025.
Operating earnings
Operating earnings is a non-GAAP financial measure
included to provide an assessment of the performance
of GNZ’s principal operating activities.
Opex
Operating expenses incurred to run and maintain
property operations.
Registrar
Computershare Investor Services Limited.
RECs
Renewable Energy Certificates.
SBTi
Science Based Targets initiative.
Shareholder or shareholder
any holder of a Share whose name is recorded in the
reg iste r.
Stabilised Portfolio
includes the properties or estates within the portfolio
that
are developed and able to be leased, ie not under
active development.
Stapled Security or Share
One GNZL share and one GPS share that are
contractually and constitutionally stapled together
such that one cannot be traded, or otherwise dealt
with, without the other. Stapled Shares or Shares in
GNZ means prior to 7 April 2026, Units; on or after
7
April 2026, Stapled Shares.
Stapled Share or Share
(a) prior to 7 April 2026, a unit; and
(b)
o
n or after 7 April 2026, one GNZL share and one
GPS share that are contractually and constitutionally
stapled together such that one cannot be traded,
or otherwise dealt with, without the other.
sqm
square metres.
tCO
2
e
Tonnes of Carbon Dioxide Equivalent.
To i t ū
Toitū Envirocare, is a provider of carbon management
and neutral certifications for New
Zealand businesses.
The organisation is a subsidiary of Crown Research
Institute, Manaaki Whenua – Landcare
Research.
Total Portfolio
total property portfolio, including external partnership
assets under management.
Unitholder or unitholder
any holder of a Unit whose name was recorded in the
register (pre-corporatisation).
Unit or unit
a unit in GMT (pre-corporatisation).
Value Add
those properties or estates within the portfolio
which
generally consist of older improvements,
offering
future redevelopment opportunity.
V WAP
Volume weighted average price.
WACC
Weighted Average Cost of Capital.
W A LT
Weighted Average Lease Term.
GLOSSARY
BUSINESS
DIRECTORY
Directors of Goodman New Zealand Limited,
Goodman Property Services (NZ) Limited
and GNZ Bond Issuer Limited
Non-executive Directors
John Dakin (Chair)
Gregory Goodman
Independent Directors
Laurissa Cooney (Chair, Audit and Risk Committee)
Leonie Freeman
David Gibson (Deputy Chair)
Steve Jurkovich (appointed 1 July 2025)
Keith Smith (retired 25 July 2025)
Executives of Goodman NZ
Chief Executive Officer
James Spence
Chief Financial Officer
Andy Eakin
General Counsel and Company Secretary
Anton Shead
General Manager – Property Services
Evan Sanders
General Manager – Development
Mike Gimblett
Director – Investment Management
and Capital Transactions
Kimberley Richards
Marketing Director
Mandy Waldin
General Manager – People
Sophie Bowden
Goodman NZ
Goodman Property Services (NZ) Limited
and Goodman New Zealand Limited
Level 8, Beca House
124 Halsey Street Auckland 1010
PO Box 90940
Victoria Street West Auckland 1142
Toll free: 0800 000 656
Telephone: +64 9 375 6060
Email: info-nz@goodman.com
Website: https://nz.goodman.com
Issuer of Bonds
GNZ Bond Issuer Limited
Level 8, Beca House
124 Halsey Street Auckland 1010
PO Box 90940
Victoria Street West Auckland 1142
Toll free: 0800 000 656
Telephone: +64 9 375 6060
Email: info-nz@goodman.com
Website: https://nz.goodman.com
Dispute Resolution Scheme
Financial Dispute Resolution Service
Freepost 231075
PO Box 2272 Wellington 6140
Toll free: 0508 337 337
Telephone: +64 4 910 9952
Email: enquiries@fdr.org.nz
Auditor
PricewaterhouseCoopers
PwC Tower
15 Customs Street West
Au c k l a n d 1010
Private Bag 92162
Auckland
Telephone: +64 9 355 8000
Facsimile: +64 9 355 8001
Registrar
Computershare Investor Services Limited
Level 2, 159 Hurstmere Road
Takapuna
Private Bag 92119
Victoria Street West
Auckland 1142
Toll free: 0800 359 999
Telephone: +64 9 488 8777
Facsimile: +64 9 488 8787
Email: enquiry@computershare.co.nz
Legal advisors
Russell McVeagh
Vero Centre, Level 30
48 Shortland Street
PO Box 8
Auckland 1140
Telephone: +64 9 367 8000
Facsimile: +64 9 367 8163
Bond supervisor
Public Trust
Level 9
34 Shortland Street
PO Box 1598 Shortland Street
Auckland 1140
Toll free: 0800 371 471
Telephone: +64 9 985 5300
17 5174
Financial Results
Goodman NZ
Annual Report 2026
GNZ Bond Issuer Limited
Annual Report 2026
ContentsYear in ReviewOur BusinessSustainabilityClimate-related DisclosuresOther InformationOther Information
This annual report of Goodman NZ and GNZ Bond Issuer Limited is dated
25 June 2026 and is signed on behalf of the Board of Directors by:
John Dakin
L
aurissa Cooney
Chair Chair, Audit and Risk Committee
nz.goodman.com
---
Goodman Property Services (NZ) Limited and Goodman New Zealand Limited, Level 8, Beca House, 124 Halsey Street, Wynyard
Quarter, Auckland 1010, New Zealand | PO Box 90940, Victoria Street West, Auckland 1142, New Zealand
Tel +64 9 375 6060 | Info-nz@goodman.com | https://nz.goodman.com
nzx release+
GNZ and GNZ Bond Issuer Limited Annual Report
Date 25 June 2026
Release Immediate
Goodman NZ (GNZ) has provided the NZX with the GNZ and GNZ Bond Issuer Limited
2026 Annual Report. It incorporates GNZ’s sustainability report, remuneration report and
Climate-related Disclosures.
The report encompasses GNZ, the Stapled Group comprising Goodman New Zealand
Limited (GNZL) and Goodman Property Services (NZ) Limited (GPS), and subsidiaries of
GNZL and GPS including GNZ Bond Issuer Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary of GNZL.
The report is available online at https://goodmanreport.co.nz/
For further information, please contact:
James Spence Andy Eakin
Chief Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer
(09) 903 3269 (09) 375 6077
Attachments provided to NZX:
1. Goodman NZ and GNZ Bond Issuer Limited 2026 Annual Report
About Goodman NZ:
Goodman NZ is New Zealand's leading warehouse and logistics space provider, managing a high-quality industrial property
portfolio valued at $4.9 billion (including assets under management) as at 31 March 2026. GNZ has more than 200
customers, a proven development capability and is focused on core industrial property markets in Auckland. GNZ is one of
the NZX’s largest listed issuers and holds an investment grade credit rating of BBB from S&P Global Ratings.
GNZ has a stapled group structure. The Stapled Group comprises of Goodman New Zealand Limited (GNZL) and Goodman
Property Services (NZ) Limited (GPS), and subsidiaries of GNZL and GPS.
Data sourced from publicly available filings. Our datasets may not be complete. Automated analysis can produce errors. If you believe any data on this page is incorrect, please contact us at hello@nzxplorer.co.nz. For informational purposes only. Not investment advice.