Mercury grows earnings and engagement with strong execution
NZX Appendix 1 – 30 June 2018 | Page 1 of 2
Mercury NZ Limited
Stock Exchange listings NZX (MCY) ASX (MCY)
Results for announcement to the market
1. Full year reporting periods
Reporting Period 12 months to 30 June 2018
Previous Reporting Period 12 months to 30 June 2017
NZD Amount ($M) Percentage change
Revenue from ordinary activities 1,803 +12.9%
Profit from ordinary activities after tax attributable to
security holders
234 +27.2%
Net profit attributable to security holders 234 +27.2%
Earnings before net interest expense, income tax,
depreciation, amortisation, change in fair value of
financial instruments, impairments and equity
accounted earnings (EBITDAF)
561 +7.3%
Underlying earnings after tax
1
198 +12.5%
NZD Amount Percentage change
Basic and diluted earnings per share (weighted
average number of shares)
$0.1702 +27.3%
Net tangible assets per share (excluding treasury
shares)
$2.34 +0.0%
Final Dividend Amount per security
Imputed amount per
security
Final Dividend $0.091 $0.035389
2
Appendix 1 – Full year results
NZX Appendix 1 – 30 June 2018 | Page 2 of 2
Record Date 13 September 2018
Dividend Payment Date 28 September 2018
Comments:
1. Underlying earnings after tax excludes one-off and/or
infrequently occurring events (exceeding $10 million of net
profit before tax). This is a non-GAAP measure.
2. A supplementary dividend of $0.016059 per share will be
payable on the final dividend to shareholders who are not
resident in New Zealand.
2. Control of entities gained or lost during the period
Name Date control lost
MRP NRI-Germany Holdings Limited Dissolved 5 October 2017.
MRP NRI-Peru Holdings Limited Dissolved 5 October 2017.
MRP NRI-Chile Holdings Limited Dissolved 5 October 2017.
MRP Geotermia Chile Limitada Sold 24 July 2017.
3. Dividends
See section 1 above and NZX Appendix 7 attached.
4. Dividend or distribution reinvestment plans
None.
5. Associates and joint venture entities
Refer to Annual Consolidated Financial Statements for year ended 30 June 2018.
6. Accounting Standards
Refer to Annual Consolidated Financial Statements for year ended 30 June 2018.
7. Audit
This report is derived from the audited Annual Consolidated Financial Statements. EY has provided an Audit Report on
the Financial Statements, copy attached.
Attachments:
➢ News release
➢ Results presentation
➢ Annual Report and Audited Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June 2018
➢ NZX Appendix 7 – ordinary dividend
---
Mercury grows earnings and engagement in year of strong execution
Summary
>> Operating earnings (EBITDAF) $561 million, up 7%
>> Net profit after tax $234 million, up 27%
>> Final ordinary dividend 9.1 cents per share fully imputed to be paid on 28 September 2018
21 August 2018 – Record hydro generation for a second consecutive year has driven another record financial
result for Mercury (NZX:MCY) in the 12-months to 30 June 2018. An emphasis on enabling people and their
performance saw further growth in employee engagement and the successful delivery of major reinvestment and
several key customer-focused innovations.
Mercury today reported a 7% lift in operating earnings (EBITDAF) to $561 million for the 2018 financial year ($523
million FY2017). The record result was significantly influenced by strong and timely hydro inflows across the
Waikato River catchment, and high geothermal availability was maintained. Total hydro generation of 4,947GWh
for the year was 947GWh (24%) ahead of average generation and up on FY2017’s record of 4,724 GWh. The lift in
Waikato hydro generation above average increased New Zealand’s proportion of renewable electricity by more
than 2%. Total generation including geothermal was 7,704 GWh (7,533 GWh FY2017).
Financial Results
FY2018 FY2017 FY2016 FY2015 FY2014
EBITDAF ($M) 561 523 493 482 504
NET PROFIT AFTER TAX ($M) 234 184 160 47 212
UNDERLYING EARNINGS AFTER
TAX ($M)
198 176 152 145 185
FULLY IMPUTED ORDINARY
DIVIDEND (CENTS PER SHARE)
15.1* 14.6 14.3 14.0 13.5
FULLY IMPUTED SPECIAL
DIVIDENDS
(CENTS PER SHARE)
5.0
7.5
UNIMPUTED SPECIAL DIVIDEND
(CENTS PER SHARE)
4.0
-
SHARE BUYBACK $50m
$50m
ELECTRICITY GENERATION (GWh) 7,704 7,533 6,842 6,536 6,295
* above guidance of 15.0 cps reflecting share buyback reducing the number of shares on issue.
Mercury’s chief executive, Fraser Whineray, said that sustaining high levels of operational performance while
executing a number of key strategic projects puts Mercury in a strong position for the year ahead.
Key projects during the year included a major ICT systems upgrade, completion of Metrix’s meter data project
upgrade expanding its ability to provide certified half-hourly meter reads; hydro refurbishments at Aratiatia and
Whakamaru stations (ongoing); and major maintenance outages at geothermal stations.
Employee engagement increased to 81.5% from 81% as measured by the 2018 IBM Employee Engagement
Survey Index. During the year Mercury received major honours at the IBM Best Workplace Awards and the New
Zealand HR Awards.
STOCK EXCHANGE LISTINGS: NZX (MCY) / ASX (MCY)
2
The Mercury brand maintained its trader churn (customer switching to an alternative retailer) advantage at 6.4%
compared to the rest of the market at 8.1%.
“Retail market conditions remain very competitive, however our brand and customer service activity, focused on
inspiring, rewarding and making things easy for our customers, continues to show strong results,” Mr Whineray
said.
Mercury brand activity from the prior year won the two top awards at New Zealand’s premier marketing events
during FY2018 year, claiming top spot against marketing heavyweights such as Air New Zealand and Z Energy.
“Mercury is benefitting from developing a distinctive brand. We advanced our e-bike campaign and launched a
high-profile integrated campaign utilising a converted classic ’57 Ford Fairlane to challenge misconceptions about
electric vehicles (EVs).”
Brand recognition has increased strongly to 63% from 43% since Mercury’s brand relaunch in 2016.
Mercury executed a $50m share buyback through the year. Mercury also completed the purchase of a 19.99%
stake in Tilt Renewables (NZX/ASX:TLT), a company with significant operational and consented wind generation
interests in Australasia, in May.
“Our shareholding in Tilt is an extension of our long-term growth strategy. It gives Mercury a meaningful interest in
significant development opportunities related to Australia’s accelerating transition to renewable energy sources and
is part of Mercury’s broader wind strategy which has been worked on for more than a decade,” Mr Whineray said.
Net profit after tax increased 27% to $234 million from (FY2017 $184 million), reflecting higher earnings partially
offset by higher tax expense. Underlying earnings after tax increased 13% to $198 million (FY2017 $176 million).
Operating costs were flat for the fifth consecutive year at $214 million and remain $45 million below their peak in
FY2012.
Stay-in-business capital expenditure remained elevated beyond normalised rates at $112 million (FY2017 $114
million) reflecting ongoing hydro refurbishment and ICT investment.
Dividend
Mercury Chair Joan Withers says Mercury’s nearly 85,000 owners, including the Crown, will receive a final ordinary
dividend of 9.1 cents per share, fully imputed. This brings full year final ordinary dividend payments to a total of
15.1 cents per share, fully imputed, up 3.4% on FY2017. This is above guidance and reflects the reduced number
of shares on issue following the completion of the $50 million share buyback. It is Mercury’s tenth consecutive year
of ordinary dividend growth.
“We are pleased to continue to deliver strong shareholder returns while executing on our strategy that includes
delivering sustainable growth.” Mrs Withers said.
“Execution of Mercury’s priorities this year has been impressive and I acknowledge the contribution to that of
people right through the business, along with the support of shareholders, partners and the loyalty of customers.”
FY2019 Guidance
EBITDAF guidance is $515m for FY2019, based on forecast hydro generation of 4,200 GWh. This guidance is
subject to any material events, significant one-off expenses or other unforeseeable circumstances including
hydrological conditions.
Operating expenditure is forecast to be flat versus FY2018; maintained at a similar level for the sixth year in a row.
Stay in business capital expenditure guidance is $95 million. This expenditure supports ongoing hydro and
geothermal investments that contribute to efficient generation, technology aligned to customer needs, and
investment in people and culture through Mercury’s Auckland office consolidation.
Ordinary fully imputed FY2019 dividend guidance has been issued at 15.5 cents per share, a 2.6% increase on
FY2018.
3
Mercury will continue to provide updates of its mid-point estimate of full-year hydro generation with its quarterly
operating statistics.
Outlook
Mr Whineray said that Mercury was well positioned to build momentum through developing its people, inspiring its
customers and executing on its growth strategy.
“Notwithstanding strong execution, weather can be fickle year on year, and our role is to maximise the outcomes
from the hand we are dealt,” Mr Whineray said.
“We expect continued electricity demand growth. While industrial demand decline remains a trend, we see this
being partially offset over the medium-term as industrials shift energy use away from fossil fuels.”
Mr Whineray said that the expected restarting of New Zealand Aluminium Smelter’s fourth potline at Tiwai Point,
Southland, is expected to contribute around 1% annually to demand growth.
For further information:
Media – Craig Dowling 0272 105 337
Investors – Tim Thompson 0275 173 470
ABOUT MERCURY NZ LIMITED
Mercury’s mission is energy freedom. Our purpose is to inspire New Zealanders to enjoy energy in more wonderful
ways and our goal is to be New Zealand’s leading energy brand. We focus on our customers, our people, our
partners and our country; maintain a long-term view of sustainability; and promote wonderful choices. Mercury is
energy made wonderful.
Visit us at: www.mercury.co.nz
---
Chief Financial Officer
Financial Results
for the year ended 30 June 2018
WILLIAM MEEK
FRASER WHINERAY
Chief Executive
21 August 2018
DISCLAIMER
The information in this presentation has been prepared by Mercury NZ Limited with due care and attention. However, neither the
company nor any of its directors, employees, shareholders nor any other person shall have any liability whatsoever to any personfor
any loss (including, without limitation, that arising from any fault or negligence) arising from this presentation or any information
supplied in connection with it.
This presentation may contain projections or forward-looking statements regarding a variety of items.Such projections or forward-
looking statements are based on current expectations, estimates and assumptions and are subject to a number of risks, uncertainties
and assumptions.There is no assurance that results contemplated in any projections and forward-looking statements in this
presentation will be realised.Actual results may differ materially from those projected in this presentation. No person is under any
obligation to update this presentation at any time after its release to you or to provide you with further information about Mercury NZ
Limited.
Forward-looking statements are subject to any material adverse events, significant one-off expenses or other unforeseeable
circumstances including hydrological conditions.
A number of non-GAAP financial measures are used in this presentation, which are outlined in the appendix of the presentation. You
should not consider any of these in isolation from, or as a substitute for, the information provided in the audited consolidatedfinancial
statements for the year ended 30 June 2018, which are available at www.mercury.co.nz.
The information in this presentation is of a general nature and does not constitute financial product advice, investment advice or any
recommendation. Nothing in this presentation constitutes legal, financial, tax or other advice.
DISCLAIMER
2
OUR MISSION
3
MERCURY
4
100% renewable generation
>Two low-cost complementary fuel sources
in base-load geothermal and peaking
hydro
Superior asset location
>North Island generation located near major
load centres; rain-fed hydro catchment
inflows aligned with winter peak demand
Substantial peaking capacity
>The Waikato hydro system is the largest
group of peaking stations in the
NorthIsland
High performance teams
>Dynamic company culture built on the
understanding that our people set
us apart
Track record of customer engagement
>Brand capital built through customer-led
innovation and rewarding loyalty
Long-term commercial partnerships
>With Maori landowners and other
key stakeholders
MERCURY’S COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE
FY2018 HIGHLIGHTS
5
$561m
RECORDEARNINGS
Achieved as the value of favourable
hydrological conditions was realisedby
strong execution across the business
BRAND IDENTITY
Multi-award-winning campaigns
building brand capitalto differentiate
Mercury in intensely competitive retail
market
9.1cps
FINAL DIVIDEND
Fully-imputed total ordinary dividend of
15.1cps; an increase of 3.4% versus
FY2017
7,704GWh
RECORDGENERATION
As Mercury capitalisedon opportunities
provided by hydro inflows and maintained
high geothermal availability
Customer-ledtechnology
DEVELOPMENT
Throughcompletionof Metrix meter data
project, SAP upgrade and customer
technology platform upgrades
Stay-in-business capital expenditureof
$112m
Included delivery of ICT projects and
ongoing hydro refurbishment leading to
material efficiencyand capacitygains
COMPETITION
Retail market conditions highly
competitivewith market churn at
record levelsduring the year
GROWTH
Acquisition of 19.99% stake in Tilt
Renewablesachieving exposure to
Australian renewables transition; part of
decade-longwind strategy
$50m
SHARE BUYBACK
An efficient distribution of capital to
shareholders while retaining balance
sheet strength
FY2018 HIGHLIGHTS
6
FY2018 HIGHLIGHTS
698
214
523
184
176
258
2
114
201
69
734
214
561
234
198
259
150
112
207
50
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
Energy MarginOperating
Expenditure
EBITDAFNPATUnderlying
Earnings
Free Cash FlowNew InvestmentStay-In-Business
Capital
Expenditure
Declared
Ordinary
Dividend
Other
Distributions
$m
FY2017
FY2018
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE
7
>EBITDAF, NPAT and Underlying Earnings up reflecting record total generation of 7,704GWh achieved as the value of
favourable hydro inflows was captured by continued strong execution across the business
>Free Cash Flow only up $1m due to timing of tax payments to impute prior year dividends (tax paid up $50m vs FY2017)
>Stay-in-business capex was elevated reflecting ongoing hydro refurbishment and technology investment
>$50m buyback of 15.6m shares as an efficient distribution of capital while retaining balance sheet strength
>Total ordinary dividend of 15.1cps, the 10
th
year of ordinary dividend growth; above guidance reflecting share buyback
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE
DELIVERING CUSTOMER ADVOCACY
>Relative churn advantage
>Mercury brand trader churn
1
significantly lower than market at 6.4%
2
>Trader churn for all Mercury brands increased to be comparable to market at
8.0%
2
versus 8.1% reflecting heightened market competition
>Customer-led technology investment
>SAP technology platform upgrades enabling increased functionality and flexibility
to meet customer needs and also improved efficiency and processes
>Metrix data project delivering certified half-hourly meter reads to retailers
>Sustained brand momentum
>Award-winning campaigns building strong and distinctive brand assets with
associations with E-mobility and EVs in particular
>Brand recognition steadily increasing (from 43% to 63%)
4
since relaunch
>Fulfilment of our customer promises to Reward, Inspire and Make It Easy
>~90,000 customers redeemed a Free Power Day in FY2018
>Over 155,000 customers registered to receive Airpoints™
5
>Over 93,000 customers engaging with our Good Energy Monitor each week
6
STRATEGIC DRIVERS & FY2018 OUTCOMES
8
1
Switching where a customer changes retailer without moving house
2
From EA data; 12-monthly rolling trader churn / total churn as at 30 June 2018
3
Based on Mercury’s monthly survey of residential customers, 3-monthly rolling
average to 30 June 2018 / 2017 for Mercury brand only
4
Based on Mercury commissioned TRA brand survey
5
As at 30 June 2018
6
Weekly average over 12 months to 30 June 2018
19.8%
Total churn
2
FY2017: 17.7%
Market: 21.0%
6.4%
Mercury brand
trader churn
2
FY2017: 4.4%
Market: 8.1%
63%
Customer
satisfaction
3
FY2017: 64%
FY2018 OUTCOMES
94%
Geothermal
availability
3
FY2017: 96%
Market
4
: ~97%
1.06
LWAP/GWAP
2
FY2017: 1.05
0.87
FY2018 TRIFR
1
FY2017: 1.05
LEVERAGING CORE STRENGTHS
>Goal of zero-harm
>No high-severity incidents; TRIFR
1
at 0.87 (down from 1.05 in FY2017)
>High-levels of employee engagement maintained
>High levels of employee engagement in 2017 saw Mercury being recognised at
the IBM 2017 Best Workplaces Awards and the 2018 New Zealand HR Awards
>Employee engagement increased in 2018 to 81.5%
5
from 81.0%
5
>Enterprise-wide project execution
>Completed major maintenance outages at four geothermal stations
>Metrix half-hourly reconciled data re-platform brought online
>Ongoing hydro refurbishment with the rehabilitation of the 1
st
of three units at
Aratiatia Station and the 2
nd
of four units at Whakamaru Station leading to
material increases in hydro efficiency and capacity
>Southdown grid-scale battery storage being commissioned
>Competitive advantages deliver record earnings
>Favourable hydrological conditions and strong execution across the business
enabled record generation of 7,704GWh leading to FY2018 EBITDAF of $561m
STRATEGIC DRIVERS & FY2018 OUTCOMES
9
1
Total Recordable Injury Frequency Rate per 200,000 hours; includes onsite employees
and contractors
2
Average price of purchases (LWAP) over average price of generation (GWAP)
3
Percentage of time plant able to generate after accounting for outages
4
Derived from Planned Outage Co-ordination Process New Zealand geothermal outage
data (excluding Mercury operated plant)
5
As measured by the 2018 / 2017 IBM Employee Engagement Survey Engagement Index
FY2018 OUTCOMES
DELIVERING SUSTAINABLE GROWTH
>Managing cost
>Opex flat versus FY2017 at $214m for fifth year running
>Investing in growth
>Acquired a 19.99% stake in Tilt Renewables as a strong platform for gaining
exposure to Australia’s accelerating renewables transition
>Joint takeover offer with Infratilunderway to advance Mercury’s meaningful
interest in Tilt’s operational performance and growth opportunities
>Returns to shareholders
>Efficient distribution of capital to shareholders through share buyback of 15.6m
shares for $50m (circa 3.6cps) while retaining balance sheet strength
>FY2018 total ordinary dividend up 3.4% to 15.1cps, above original guidance
>FY2019 EBITDAF guidance is $515m
1
on 4,200GWh of hydro generation, subject
to any material events, significant one-off expenses or other unforeseeable
circumstances including hydrological conditions
>FY2019 ordinary dividend guidance up 2.6% to 15.5cps, which will be the 11
th
consecutive year of ordinary dividend growth
STRATEGIC DRIVERS & FY2018 OUTCOMES
10
FY2018 OUTCOMES
$50m
Share Buyback
of 15.6m shares
15.1cps
Total Ordinary
Dividend
FY2017: 14.6cps
19.99%
Tilt
acquisition
1
Includes impact of IFRS changes, see slide 32 in
Appendix for further details
11
MARKET DYNAMICS
12
FUTURES PRICES CURRENTLY UNRESPONSIVE TO PRICE VOLATILITY
ANTICIPATED MARKET OUTCOMES
>Demand growth
>Increased wholesale price volatility
>Futures price increase
>Commercial and Industrial (C&I) upwards price pressure
>Retail churn reduction
>Upward pressure on retail price
FUNDAMENTALS: SUPPLY AND DEMAND BETTER BALANCED
✓
✓
?
MARKET DYNAMICS
Pressure on retail margins
expected if wholesale price
and volatility remains elevated
}
?
?
?
C&I market demonstrating
higher tolerance for
wholesale price risk
}
UNDERLYING FACTORS DRIVE STEADY DEMAND GROWTH
MARKET DYNAMICS
13
>Demand higher, led by increases in the urban and dairy sectors
>Up 0.8% in FY2018 (1HY2018 1.4% & 2HY2018 0.1%), 1.3% after normalising for temperature (1HY2018 2.1% & 2HY2018 0.6%)
>Industrial demand decline remains a trend –reflecting ageing plant and relative global competitiveness
>Increased focus on renewable energy may partially offset this trend as the industrial and transport sectors’ green shoots shift energy use
away from fossil fuels
>Tiwai Point 4
th
potline restart expected to contribute ~0.5% demand growth in FY2019 (+1% annualised)
Source: TranspowerSCADA data, Mercury
1
Normalised for temperature
SectorGWhSector%Total %
Urban
1
+3552.2%0.9%
Rural
1
+480.7%0.1%
Dairy processing+871.4%0.2%
Irrigation+232.0%0.1%
Industrial-20(0.2%)(0.1%)
Other+365.1%0.1%
Total+5291.3%
FY2018 NORMALISED DEMAND GROWTH BY SECTOR
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
16,000
Urban*Rural*DairyTiwaiIndustrial
(excluding
Tiwai)
Irrigation
GWh
DEMAND
FY2014FY2015FY2016
FY2017FY2018
$0
$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
$300
-1500-1000-500050010001500
OTA Wholesale Price ($/MWh)
Delta to SI Storage Average (GWh)
SI MONTHLY HYDRO STORAGE AND PRICE
Jan 1999 to Jun 2016
FY2017
FY2018
$0
$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
$300
-400-2000200400
OTA Wholesale Price ($/MWh)
Delta to NI Storage Average (GWh)
NI MONTHLY HYDRO STORAGE AND PRICE
Jan 1999 to Jun 2016
FY2017
FY2018
Graphs Source: NZX Hydro, Pricing Manager (NZX), Mercury
14
MARKET DYNAMICS
FY2018 WHOLESALE PRICES REFLECT VARIABLE NATIONAL HYDROLOGY
>Mercury benefitted from monthly price variation caused by swings in dry/wet conditions
>Above average North Island (NI) inflows coincided with periods of low South Island (SI) storage in FY2018
>Large SI hydro catchments and associated hydrology is a primary driver of wholesale prices
>Higher prices and increased volatility show effect of recent supply/demand rebalancing
~15% of annual national generation
17% of total hydro energy storage
28% of annual national inflows
~45% of annual national generation
83% of total hydro energy storage
72% of annual national inflows
Mercury benefits from high
prices and high volumes
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.3
2009201020112012201320142015201620172018
Financial Year
HYDRO GWAP / TWAP RATIO
MCY
MCY Long-Term Ratio
SI
SI Long-Term Ratio
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
2009201020112012201320142015201620172018
$ / MWh
Financial Year
EBITDAF
3
/ TOTAL GENERATION
MCYCEN
GNEMEL
>Value of low correlation of Mercury’s hydro catchment to SI hydrology shown by higher EBITDAF
3
/Generation ratio
>Also highlighted by Mercury’s consistently higher hydro generation GWAP/TWAP
1
ratio
>Long-term hydro generation GWAP/TWAP ratio is 1.10 versus 0.96 for major SI hydro generators
2
MERCURY’S HYDRO ADVANTAGE LIFTS GENERATION VALUE
15
MARKET DYNAMICS
1
Generation-Weighted Average Price / Time-Weighted
Average Price
2
Based on 10 years to 30 Jun 2018
3
Analyst consensus figures used for GNE and MEL
FY2018 EBITDAF, all other figures from company reports
Source: WITS, Pricing Manager (NZX), Mercury
Source: Company Reporting, WITS, Mercury
$0
$20
$40
$60
$80
$100
$120
$140
Apr-13Oct-13Apr-14Oct-14Apr-15Oct-15Apr-16Oct-16Apr-17Oct-17Apr-18Oct-18Apr-19
$/MWh
OTAHUHU FUTURES AND SPOT PRICES
(Monthly average 2 year price starting 3 quarters ahead)
ASX Futures
Spot (Monthly average)
$65
$70
$75
$80
$85
$90
$95
Jul-12
Jan-13
Jul-13
Jan-14
Jul-14
Jan-15
Jul-15
Jan-16
Jul-16
Jan-17
Jul-17
Jan-18
Jul-18
$/MWh
HISTORICAL ASX FUTURES PRICES
(Rolling 2 year average price starting 3 quarters ahead)
Otahuhu
Benmore
>Short-term futures prices sensitive to hydrological conditions
>Medium-term futures prices still range-bound (~$73-$83/MWh Otahuhu) despite increased wholesale price volatility
>Negative futures prices margin relative to wholesale prices in FY2018
16
FUTURES MARKET UNRESPONSIVE TO PRICE VOLATILITY
Futures pricing flat
Graphs Source: ASX, Pricing Manager (NZX)
MARKET DYNAMICS
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
Jul-16
Oct-16
Jan-17
Apr-17
Jul-17
Oct-17
Jan-18
Apr-18
Jul-18
Annual Churn
NATIONAL CHURN RATE
(12mth rolling)
All Retailers
Mercury
Mercury Brand
}
>Intense retail competition in 2H FY2018 contributed to Mercury customer numbers decreasing by 4,000 in FY2018
>Customer satisfaction
1
based on Mercury’s survey remained stable going from 64% in FY2017 to 63%
-10,000
-8,000
-6,000
-4,000
-2,000
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
Switches
NATIONAL SWITCHING
Mercury Group
Mercury Brand
Prior 12mth Mercury Switches
Net Switches
0%
10%
20%
30%
Jul-16
Oct-16
Jan-17
Apr-17
Jul-17
Oct-17
Jan-18
Apr-18
Jul-18
Switches
Withdrawn
2
RETAIL MARKET HIGHLY COMPETITIVE
17
All switches
Trader switches
3
Source: Electricity Authority, EMI –Market share trends and switching breakdown
1
Based on Mercury’s monthly survey of residential customers, 3-monthly rolling
average to 30 June for Mercury brand only
2
Switches which were initiated but not completed (inclusive of saves)
3
A trader switch is where a customer changes retailer without changing house
}
MARKET DYNAMICS
3%
6%
9%
12%
Jul-16
Oct-16
Jan-17
Apr-17
Jul-17
Oct-17
Jan-18
Apr-18
Jul-18
Annual Churn
NATIONAL TRADER CHURN
(12mth rolling)
MarketCEN
GNEMEL
TPW Ex-TaurangaTPW
MCY GroupMCY Brand
Other
Graphs source: Electricity Authority, EMI –Switching breakdown
1
Tauranga (Powerco)
2
Auckland (Vector)
MERCURY BRAND MAINTAINS CHURN ADVANTAGE
18
>Mercury brand has kept a material churn advantage compared to the rest of the market
>Mercury group churn has increased to near-market levels as smaller brands have experienced elevated churn due to
the nature of their customer base
0%
3%
6%
9%
12%
15%
18%
Jul-16
Oct-16
Jan-17
Apr-17
Jul-17
Oct-17
Jan-18
Apr-18
Jul-18
Annual Churn
AUCKLAND
2
TRADER CHURN
(12mth rolling)
MarketCEN
GNEMEL
TPWOther
MCY GroupMCY Brand
1
MARKET DYNAMICS
POLICY FOCUS OF NEW GOVERNMENT
MARKET DYNAMICS
19
Electricity Price Review
>Announced as part of coalition government agreement following September 2017 general election
>Focus on incremental changes designed to improve customer access, affordability and energy literacy
>Issues paper expected September 2018 followed by a submission process and workshops with stakeholders and consumers
Climate Change
>Legislation this year likely as some cross Party support exists for tightening NZ’s emissions reductions target, improving the
Emissions Trading Scheme and establishing an independent Climate Commission similar to the United Kingdom model
>Interim Climate Change Committee investigating options, costs and practicality of transitioning to a low emissions energy future
>Electrification across the economy key to a low carbon economy with scope to transform the transport and industrial heat sectors,
opportunity to establish economy-wide low emissions energy target and remove barriers to further investment in renewable
electricity generation
Thermal Fuel Discouraged
>New Zealand signatory to a November 2017 agreement to phase coal out of power generation by 2030
>Government announced that no new off-shore oil and gas drilling permits will be issued (April 2018)
Transmission Pricing Methodology
>Electricity Authority remains committed to a beneficiaries pay approach to transmission pricing; next update December 2018
MERCURY’S LONG-TERM WIND JOURNEY
MARKET DYNAMICS
20
Mercury must participate in wind to materially take part in renewable generation development in the medium-term
>More than decade long journey leads to optimal development options
>Large-scale development delayed by low demand growth environment over the past decade
>Acquisition of stake in Tilt Renewables is an extension of our long-term growth strategy
>Robust portfolio of operating wind farms in both Australia and New Zealand; best Australian pipeline
>Aligned with our signalled strategy for economic growth
>Allowing meaningful participation in Australia’s accelerating transition to renewable energy sources
200420052006200720082009201020112012
Projects
Consenting
processes
Milestones
0Up to 10-12 core prospects across NI & SI
Reduced to 2-3 by 2013
Puketoi
Turitea
2 (consented)
PNCC selects
MCY as developer
for Turitea
Turitea
consents
final
Puketoi
consents
final
201320142015201620172018
Tilt
Turitea landowner
agreements
signed
Puketoilandowner
agreements
signed
Investments
21
FINANCIAL SUMMARY
22
$561m
EBITDAF, up $38m, reflecting
favourable hydro inflows and continued
strong company-wide performance
$234m
NPAT, up $50m, reflecting higher
earnings, fair value gains and reduction in
impairments offset by higher tax expense
2.0x
Debt/EBITDAF, consistent with BBB+
credit rating and headroom for growth;
impacted by record earnings (2.3x after
normalising earnings for hydro variance)
$259m
Free Cash Flow, reflecting strong
cashflows from low cost 100%
renewable generation and tax
prepayments for dividend imputation
$50m
Share buyback as an efficient means of
returning capital while retaining balance
sheet strength
15.1cps
Fully-imputed full-year ordinary dividend
declared, above original guidance due
to share buyback
FINANCIAL SUMMARY
FY2018 FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
CONTINUOUS FOCUS ON CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
23
FINANCIAL SUMMARY
Investment
in growth
Repayment of debt
Capital
returns to
shareholders
Operating Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow
Stay-in-business capital expenditure
Ordinary dividend
STABLE CAPITAL STRUCTURE
FINANCIAL SUMMARY
24
1
Adjusted for S&P treatment of Mercury’s Capital Bond
>BBB+ rating is key reference point for dividend policy and an efficient and sustainable capital structure
>S&P re-affirmed Mercury’s credit rating of BBB+/stable on 11 December 2017
>One-notch upgrade given majority Crown ownership
>Capital management continuously reviewed
>Targeting gearing at low end of Debt / EBITDAF between 2.2x and 3.0x (within key ratio for stand-alone S&P credit rating BBB)
to provide debt headroom due to Government minimum equity ownership requirement
>Gearing range reflects flexibility afforded by Treasury stock retained from share buyback
>Debt / EBITDAF 2.0xat 30 June 2018
1
(2.3x after EBITDAF normalisation for above-average hydro generation)
30 June 201830 June 201730 June 201630 June 201530 June 2014
Net debt ($m)
1,2491,0381,0681,0821,031
Gearing ratio (%)
27.523.924.424.524.3
Debt/EBITDAF(x)
2.0
1
1.8
1
2.0
1
2.0
1
2.1
Capital management
priority
Capital returns
Growth
FY2019 GUIDANCE SUMMARY
FINANCIAL SUMMARY
25
>FY2019 EBITDAF guidance is $515m on 4,200GWh of hydro generation, subject to hydrological volatility, wholesale
market conditions and any material adverse events, significant one-off expenses or other unforeseeable
circumstances
>FY2019 ordinary dividend guidance is up 2.6% to 15.5cps
>FY2019 operating expenditure is forecast to be flat versus FY2018
>FY2019 stay-in-business capital expenditure guidance is $95m
>FY2019 Free Cash Flow will be positively affected by the roll-off of historical interest rate hedges (circa $20m net
annual cash flow benefit); partially offset by increased debt
562
500
515
~15
~15
62
~15
400
430
460
490
520
550
580
FY2018 ActualHydro and Other
Adjustments
(4,150GWh)
FY2018 Original
Guidance
Hydro Normalisation
(4,000GWh)
Hydro Adjustment
(4,200GWh)
OtherFY2019 Guidance
$m
INDICATIVE GUIDANCE BRIDGE
IncreaseDecrease
FY2019 GUIDANCE –UNDERLYING EARNINGS GROWTH
FINANCIAL SUMMARY
26
>FY2019 EBITDAF guidance assumes:
>4,200GWh of hydro generation (747GWh less than FY2018, 200GWh above average)
>Operating expenditure flat relative to FY2018
>Growth from technology investment to improve customer profitability, cost transparency and trading performance
1
Includes impact of IFRS changes, see
slide 32 in Appendix for further details
1
A DECADE OF ORDINARY DIVIDEND GROWTH
27
>FY2018 fully imputed ordinary final dividend of 9.1cps which will be the 10
th
consecutive year of ordinary dividend
growth
>FY2019 ordinary dividend guidance is an increase of 2.6% to 15.5cps reflecting the reduced number of shares on
issue following the completion of the share buyback
0
5
10
15
20
25
200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019F
Cents per share
Financial Year
DECLARED DISTRIBUTIONS
Interim dividendFinal dividendSpecial dividendShare buybackOrdinary dividend guidance
FINANCIAL SUMMARY
74
69
60
79
59
114
112
95
288
183
33
31
13
2
150
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
20122013201420152016201720182019F
$m
Financial Year
CAPITAL INVESTMENT
New investment
Stay-in-business
INVESTING IN LONG-TERM CAPABILITY
FINANCIAL SUMMARY
28
>Stay-in-business capital expenditure will be elevated in FY2019 primarily due to Auckland office consolidation for two
thirds of employees ($16m for office move)
>Consistent with medium-term guidance plus cost of new building development
>Planned stay-in-business capital expenditure in FY2019 also includes:
>Continued investment in long-lived asset capability as Waikato hydro system refurbishment continues at Aratiatia, Whakamaru
and Karapiro stations –resulting in material efficiency and capacity gains
>Continued technology investment to realise functionality of new systems
Stay-in-business capital expenditure for the period
FY2013 through FY2018 averages ~$80m
29
Q&A
Q&A
523
217
192
6
5
2
0
561
400
450
500
550
600
650
700
750
EBITDAF FY2017GenerationEnergy CostCFDsCustomer SalesOther RevenueOperating
Expenditure
EBITDAF FY2018
$m
Energy Margin up $36m
Improvement
Reduction
EBITDAF BRIDGE (FY2018 vs. FY2017)
APPENDIX
30
>Energy margin up $36m
>Record generation with 171GWh more generation from renewable sources
>Energy Cost increased with higher wholesale price
>Contribution from CFD sales was $40m, up $6m on FY2017
>Operating expenditure flat year-on-year
>Other revenue up $2m due to increases in revenue from metering and services provided to third parties
1
Energy cost excludes gas generation purchases and volume impacts of end user
sales, which are included within generation and customer sales respectively
2
Other revenue includes the direct costs related to metering services and the
purchase of solar equipment
12
-
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
2019202020212022202320242025202620272045
$m
Financial Year
DEBT MATURITIES AS AT 30 JUNE 2018
Domestic Wholesale BondsUS Private PlacementCapital BondDrawn Bank FacilitiesUndrawn Bank Facilities
DIVERSIFIED FUNDING PROFILE
31
>Committed bank loan facilities were $650m as at 30 June
>The average debt maturity profile for committed facilities was 7.2 years as at 30 June 2018
>Interest costs have been elevated due to interest rate hedges put in place in 2008 during the company’s domestic
geothermal investment programme. These hedges are rolling off with a circa $20m net annual cash flow benefit in
FY2019.
2
APPENDIX
1
Drawn bank facilities includes issued commercial paper
2
Assuming similar debt levels to FY2018
1
NEW IFRS STANDARDS
32
>Mercury will adopt IFRS 9 (Financial Instruments), IFRS 15 (Revenue From Contracts With Customers) and IFRS
16 (Leases) from FY2019
1
>Under IFRS 15
2
, credits awarded to customers in the form of upfront discounts will be recognised immediately
against revenue (previously recognised in expenses) and commissions directly attributable to obtaining new
customers will be capitalised to the balance sheet and amortisedback to expenses over a two year period
>IFRS 16 reclassification of operating lease payments will reduce expenses (increasing EBITDAF) but increase
depreciation and interest with no material impact on net profit
>IFRS 9 will have minimal impact on fair value movements through the income statement
APPENDIX
IMPACT ON GUIDANCE
IFRS 15IFRS 16Total
EBITDAF (Old standards)510
Revenue-4-4
Other expenses369
EBITDAF (New standards)-16515
1
Comparative financial statements for FY2018 will be restated
under new IFRS for the FY2019 Interim and Annual Reports
2
IFRS 15 will be reflected in Operating Statistics from Q1 FY2019;
Electricity Sales VWAP will be negatively impacted
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION >> TIM THOMPSON | HEAD OF TREASURY & INVESTOR RELATIONS T. 0275 173 470 E. INVESTOR@MERCURY.CO.NZ
---
OUR 2018
ANNUAL REPORT
02 OUR MISSION: ENERGY FREEDOM
04 AT A GLANCE
06 CHAIR & CHIEF EXECUTIVE UPDATES
18 OUR SUSTAINABILITY STATEMENT
22 24 HOURS OF WONDERFUL ENERGY
26 NEW THINKING AND HIGH PERFORMANCE TEAMS
30 KEEPING THE POWER COMING
34 CONNECTING WITH COMMUNITIES
38 GROWING SOLUTIONS TO CLIMATE CHANGE
42 FINANCIAL COMMENTARY
46 YOUR DIRECTORS
47 OUR EXECUTIVE TEAM
Energy Freedom is an outcome sought for all New Zealanders.
It is about New Zealand being less vulnerable economically and
better off environmentally through better use of homegrown
renewable energy.
OUR MISSION:
ENERGY FREEDOM.
REALISING
OUR PURPOSE
TO INSPIRE NEW ZEALANDERS
TO ENJOY ENERGY IN MORE
WONDERFUL WAYS
EXECUTING
OUR STRATEGY
DELIVERING CUSTOMER
ADVOCACY
LEVERAGING CORE STRENGTHS
DELIVERING SUSTAINABLE
GROWTH
BUILDING ON
OUR FOUNDATION >
WELLBEING
OF OUR PEOPLE AND
CUSTOMERS
02 // 03
FINANCIAL
COMMENTARY
OUR TEAM AND
STAKEHOLDERS
CHAIR AND
CHIEF EXECUTIVE
UPDATES
OUR
SUSTAINABILITY
STATEMENT
PILLARSCUSTOMER
PEOPLE
COMMERCIAL
PARTNERSHIPS
KAITIAKITANGA
BUSINESS
FUNDAMENTALS
LIVING
OUR ATTITUDE
ACHIEVING
OUR GOAL
TO BE NEW ZEALAND’S
LEADING ENERGY BRAND
COMMIT
& OWN IT
SHARE &
CONNECT
CURIOUS
& ORIGINAL
BUILDING ON
OUR FOUNDATION >
COMMERCIAL
COMMERCIALLY ASTUTE
DECISIONS
KAITIAKITANGA
THE CUSTODIANSHIP OF
NATURAL RESOURCES
FINANCIAL
COMMENTARY
OUR TEAM AND
STAKEHOLDERS
CHAIR AND
CHIEF EXECUTIVE
UPDATES
OUR
SUSTAINABILITY
STATEMENT
PILLARSCUSTOMER
PEOPLE
COMMERCIAL
PARTNERSHIPS
KAITIAKITANGA
BUSINESS
FUNDAMENTALS
91
EVs IN
OUR FLEET
Mercury is an electricity generator,
retailer and metering provider
whose purpose is to inspire
New Zealanders to enjoy energy
in more wonderful ways.
We have a long heritage in
renewable electricity generation.
Hydro and geothermal power
stations operated by Mercury
generate renewable energy
sufficient for 850,000 New Zealand
homes. This year we expanded our
renewable reach through the
acquisition of a 19.99% stake in Tilt
Renewables (Tilt) which has a
growing portfolio of wind and solar
projects in Australasia. We also
have our own consented windfarm
development options in the lower
North Island of New Zealand.
Mercury serves customers through
the Mercury brand and other
specialty brands, including the
leading prepay service GLOBUG.
Mercury’s smart metering
business, Metrix, enables better
energy choices through data.
We have a growing solar business,
Mercury Solar, with expertise in
battery and off-grid solutions.
Research and development is
also something we do: Mercury
is pioneering a scalable, national
grid-connected Tesla battery.
We support our people to be high
performers through a commitment
to wellbeing, inclusion and
development.
Our mission of Energy Freedom is
pursued in many ways, including
through the electrification of
transport. Four years ago, Mercury
identified the electrification of
transport as New Zealand’s
greatest opportunity for reducing
carbon emissions. We encourage
the adoption of electric vehicles
(EVs) and electric bikes (e.bikes)
and partnering on non-home
charging infrastructure and data.
Our goal is to be New Zealand’s
leading energy brand: inspiring,
rewarding and making things easy
for our customers.
388K
CUSTOMERS
2,181 solar customers
243 customers on
EV package
CUSTOMERS
341,286 residential
41,987 commercial
1,857 industrial
2,770 spot
2 geothermal joint ventures
4 formal iwi partnerships
10 community & commercial
partnerships
AT A GLANCE.
16
PARTNERSHIPS
04 // 05
> MERCURY
606 in Auckland
105 in Hamilton
18 in Taupo
57 in Rotorua
105 in rest of New Zealand
525
MALE
4,947 GWh of hydro
generation
2,757 GWh of
geothermal
generation
Services include:
> Providing electricity
consumption data
> Maintaining &
servicing assets
> Installing
infrastructure
891
EMPLOYEES
366
FEMALE
413K
SMART METERS
14
POWER
STATIONS*
19.99%
SHAREHOLDING
IN TILT
+
Not 100% owned by Mercury.
Geothermal stations
Hydro stations
R&D Centre
> INDUSTRY
FY2018 MARKET SHARE
GENERATIONSALES
14%19%
KARAPIRO
ARAPUNI
WAIPAPA
MARAETAI
I AND II
WHAKAMARU
MOKAI
+
OHAKURI
ATIAMURI
KAWERAU
ARATIATIA
NGATAMARIKI
NGA AWA
PURUA
+
LAKE TAUPO
ROTOKAWA
AUCKLAND
* Two are partnerships with Maori land trusts
FY2018FY2017
YOY
CHANGE
GENERATION VOLUME
(GWh)
770475332.3%
MARKET CAP
($bn as at 30 June)
4.594.57
NET DEBT
($bn as at 30 June)
1.251.04
HIGH QUALITY AND ALIGNED
EXECUTION ACROSS A BROAD
AND COMPLEX RANGE OF
ACTIVITIES HAS BEEN A
HALLMARK OF THIS YEAR.
JOAN WITHERS
CHAIR
06 // 07
FINANCIAL
COMMENTARY
OUR TEAM AND
STAKEHOLDERS
CHAIR AND
CHIEF EXECUTIVE
UPDATES
OUR
SUSTAINABILITY
STATEMENT
PILLARSCUSTOMER
PEOPLE
COMMERCIAL
PARTNERSHIPS
KAITIAKITANGA
BUSINESS
FUNDAMENTALS
ACROSS KEY FINANCIAL, BRAND
AND PEOPLE METRICS, WE HAVE
SET NEW RECORDS IN FY2018.
FRASER WHINERAY
CHIEF EXECUTIVE
Last year I highlighted the momentum
evident across the business under
Mercury’s new brand. That momentum
delivered record customer satisfaction
results, record employee engagement
and record financial results. This year
it is extremely heartening for me to see
a continuation of this performance, with
strong results set in these same areas.
Employee engagement was 81.5%
(FY2017 81%). Customer satisfaction
was 63% (FY2017 64%). And Mercury
has once again achieved record earnings
(EBITDAF) of $561 million, up 7% on
FY2017, following a second year of
record generation.
We made progress with our sustainable
growth strategy through the purchase
of a 19.99% stake in NZX and ASX-listed
Tilt (NZX:TLT) for nearly $144 million, or
$2.30 per share.
Mercury also completed an on-market
share buyback programme acquiring
nearly 15.6 million ordinary Mercury
shares (1.1%) for total consideration of
NZ$50 million, or NZ$3.21 per share.
Consistent with the 2014 buyback, the
shares are being held as treasury stock
to provide greater balance sheet
flexibility.
The buyback and Tilt investment have
lifted the company’s gearing. We target
a standalone rating of BBB (upgraded
to BBB+ because of the Crown’s 51%
shareholding) and at 2.0 we remain at
the conservative end of S&P’s indicative
range of 2.0x to 3.0x debt to EBITDAF
ratio. I make further comment on our
capital management initiatives later in
this report.
Concurrent with this extensive activity,
Mercury received significant external
recognition, with 22 awards won across
the organisation through the financial
year. These included awards for our
contact centre (teams and individuals);
for our marketing (two major awards for
our brand work); for our innovation (our
Auckland R&D Centre); for our legal
team; and two awards for our people:
Workplace Engagement Programme
of the Year and Best Workplace.
OUR RETURNS
Due to levels of rainfall higher than
average across almost the entire year,
Mercury’s hydro generation of 4,947GWh
was 223GWh up on FY2017, a new record.
Total Shareholder Return (TSR), or the
return from dividends paid and share
price changes, within FY2018 was 7.5%.
TSR was negatively impacted by our
removal from the MSCI global standard
index, as the significant share price
escalation of A2 Milk (NZX:ATM)
triggered its inclusion in our place. Given
the number of funds mandated to follow
the MSCI index, this event resulted in
record levels of shares transacting over a
very short period of time.
The Board is pleased to be returning
$207 million in total ordinary dividends
to our nearly 85,000 owners, including
the Crown, from cash flows generated
through the year. Details of our final
ordinary dividend are outlined later in
this update.
ALIGNED EXECUTION.
On behalf of your Board it is my pleasure to report to you,
our owners, on Mercury’s results for FY2018.
CHAIR’S UPDATE
While delivering strong financial results,
Mercury continues to play a broader role
in support of its customers, communities
and the country that distinguishes the
business in a highly competitive market.
During the year Mercury continued to
influence the national narrative on
energy and transport innovation,
promoting the electrification of transport
and initiating a scalable national grid
connected 1MW/2MWh battery trial to
be commissioned in August 2018.
As a board, we are delighted with the
role Chief Executive Fraser Whineray has
played in being a very early protagonist of
the benefits to be gained by the country
moving to a renewable energy target,
rather than just a renewable electricity
target, and the importance of the
electrification of vehicles as part of that
goal. We also influenced the regional
narrative on water, working collaboratively
with iwi and other stakeholders who desire
long-term sustainable outcomes across
the Waikato River catchment. Mercury
co-led a multi-stakeholder visit across
three Australian states to the complex
and diverse Murray Darling basin in
August 2017.
Mercury also influenced the sector’s
narrative on safety. This year the sector’s
StayLive workplace safety programme,
strongly supported by Mercury, won the
Electricity Engineers’ Association’s
workplace safety award, while Mercury
advanced its detailed process safety
programme across its Mokai, Ngatamariki
and Rotokawa geothermal sites in
collaboration with other geothermal
operators.
FINANCIAL
COMMENTARY
OUR TEAM AND
STAKEHOLDERS
CHAIR AND
CHIEF EXECUTIVE
UPDATES
OUR
SUSTAINABILITY
STATEMENT
PILLARSCUSTOMER
PEOPLE
COMMERCIAL
PARTNERSHIPS
KAITIAKITANGA
BUSINESS
FUNDAMENTALS
08 // 09
PEOPLE, LEADERSHIP
AND GOVERNANCE
High quality and aligned execution across
a broad and complex range of activity has
been a hallmark of this year, which Fraser
will outline in his update.
As a board, we are absolutely committed
to delivering the best possible governance
to the Company. Again, this year, we have
conducted an externally facilitated board
performance review. Our board has been
acknowledged in the highly regarded
Corporate Confidence Index which
measures institutional confidence in 50
major listed companies across Australia
and New Zealand as being in the top six
in critical areas such as effective board,
high standard of corporate governance
and appropriate board composition.
The composition of our board is always
under review and this year we were
delighted to have Scott St John join us.
Scott’s investment banking and wider
commercial background is a valued
addition to our mix of skills and
experience. You can see the graphical
description of those skills on page
34 of our 2018 Financial Report.
I announced at the 2016 Annual
Shareholders’ Meeting that I would not be
seeking re-election beyond my current
term which will end at the 2019 ASM.
Succession planning for my replacement
as Chair is underway and we are blessed
in that we have a number of high calibre
contenders currently sitting as directors.
Under our constitution the Minister of
Finance must approve the appointment
of the Chair and I have great confidence
your board will provide an excellent
successor for ratification.
Mercury has been and continues to be
a strong supporter of the Future
Directors programme which aims to
improve the pipeline of younger talent
coming into governance. We said
farewell to Nicky Ashton in December
and we have just appointed Anna
Lissaman, Director of People and Talent
at TVNZ, to the Future Director position
for an 18-month period from 1 July 2018.
Within the business, there has been
considerable focus on making human
capital a competitive advantage for
Mercury through the development and
implementation of a High Performance
Team framework. This has focused very
much on how formal and informal
teams interact, self-diagnose and
improve team performance.
Our commitment to the wellbeing of
people at Mercury is fundamental to the
sustainability of our business. Our goal
continues to be Zero Harm. We were
unsuccessful in that goal, though we are
very pleased to report that there were no
serious injuries this year.
$561M
RECORD EARNINGS
7.5%
TOTAL
SHAREHOLDER
RETURN
4,947GWh
A NEW RECORD
HYDRO GENERATION
MERCURY CONTINUES
TO PLAY A BROADER
ROLE IN SUPPORT OF
ITS CUSTOMERS,
COMMUNITIES AND
THE COUNTRY THAT
DISTINGUISHES THE
BUSINESS IN A HIGHLY
COMPETITIVE MARKET.
Our measure, Mercury’s total recordable
injury frequency rate (TRIFR), was 0.87
(down from 1.05 FY2017). Eighty-nine
percent of employees confirm that
Mercury cares about the wellbeing of its
people, compared with the 2017
benchmark across all New Zealand
organisations of 79%.
RETURNING VALUE
As noted earlier, your Board is pleased
to be returning a total of $207 million to
our owners, including the Crown, for the
full year.
The final ordinary dividend is 9.1 cents
per share, fully imputed. This brings
the full year fully imputed ordinary
dividend to 15.1 cents per share, up from
14.6 cents per share in FY2017.
This represents an increase of 0.1 cents
per share on guidance as a result of
fewer shares on issue following our
share buyback.
Mercury’s dividend is consistent with
our policy to make ordinary distributions
with a pay-out ratio of 70% to 85%
of free cash flow on average through
time. This return to shareholders
represents the tenth consecutive year
of ordinary dividend growth.
Mercury’s final dividend will be paid to
shareholders on 28 September 2018.
Our capital management initiatives
support Mercury’s investment-grade
credit rating (BBB+), which was
reaffirmed by S&P Global Ratings in
December 2017.
We have issued guidance for the FY2019
year based on forecast hydro generation
of 4,200GWh, 200GWh above average
based on catchment inflows and
generation year-to-date.
EBITDAF guidance for FY2019 is
$515 million, subject to any material
events, significant one-off expenses
or other unforeseeable circumstances
including hydrological conditions.
Ordinary dividend guidance has
been issued at 15.5 cents per share,
an increase of 2.6% on FY2018, again
reflecting fewer shares being on issue
following our share buyback.
Stay-in-business capital expenditure
guidance is $95 million due to planned
hydro, geothermal and technology
investments in FY2019, as well as
investment in people and culture
through Mercury’s Auckland office
consolidation to Newmarket.
CONNECTING
I look forward to providing an update
on Mercury’s business performance and
strategic priorities at our ASM in
Auckland. This year’s meeting will be held
earlier than in the past, on 28 September.
This has been arranged following
feedback, expressing a desire for us to
discuss our results with you, our owners,
in closer proximity to them having been
finalised. Owners not able to attend can
follow proceedings on a live webcast and
you can cast a proxy vote on any
resolutions by post or online.
We will also talk about our business
at a retail investor roadshow at a
number of locations around the country
late in the first half of the new financial
year.
CONCLUSION
What has heartened me most through
the year has been the strong alignment
evident across Mercury as we build on
our heritage through quality execution
of our strategic plan.
I extend my sincere thanks to my
colleagues on the board and I especially
want to pay tribute to our Chief
Executive Fraser Whineray, his executive
group and all our team members across
the country for their dedication,
commitment and contribution to
Mercury’s achievements. I gratefully
acknowledge our customers, partners,
other stakeholders and you, our owners,
for your continued trust and support.
JOAN WITHERS, CHAIR
ORDINARY DIVIDEND GUIDANCE HAS
BEEN ISSUED AT 15.5 CENTS PER SHARE,
AN INCREASE OF 2.6% ON FY2018.
10 // 1110 // 11
FINANCIAL
COMMENTARY
OUR TEAM AND
STAKEHOLDERS
CHAIR AND
CHIEF EXECUTIVE
UPDATES
OUR
SUSTAINABILITY
STATEMENT
PILLARSCUSTOMER
PEOPLE
COMMERCIAL
PARTNERSHIPS
KAITIAKITANGA
BUSINESS
FUNDAMENTALS
Across key financial, brand and people
metrics, we have set new records in
FY2018 above the previous records
achieved in FY2017. We are pleased to
have advanced these in strong
alignment with our mission of Energy
Freedom; for customers and the country.
A fundamental driver of performance
has been a clear customer-led
approach backed by a comprehensive
lift in leadership capability throughout
Mercury. The team is in very good shape,
has a clear direction and is showing
strong momentum early in FY2019. The
year ahead will see our growth strategy
take a stronger prominence, building on
our underlying core business execution.
FINANCIAL
PERFORMANCE
It rained. The resulting record Waikato
Hydro scheme generation was the
primary driver in lifting EBITDAF to
record levels. However, capturing value
from those inflows would not have been
possible without the expertise and efforts
of our people. In flood or drought, teams
throughout the company dynamically
manage planned and unplanned plant
maintenance, our portfolio and wholesale
markets positions and hundreds of
resource consent conditions as part of
environmental stewardship.
It continues to be clear that the value of
the Waikato Hydro scheme as a buffer to
nature’s volatility is as fundamental to
the Waikato community as it is for its
contribution to New Zealand’s renewable
electricity generation. Absent the
Waikato Hydro scheme, the rainfall over
the last few years, particularly with the
ex-cyclones of 2017, would have likely
resulted in extensive environmental and
public and private asset damage around
Taupo and throughout the lower Waikato.
We continue to enjoy a very strong
relationship with the Waikato Regional
Council who is the flood and drought
manager for the catchment and is the
critical co-ordinator in balancing matters
across the catchment in such events.
Stay-in-business capital expenditure
(SIB CAPEX) of $112 million reflected
high quality execution across hydro,
geothermal and technology platforms.
The reinvestment programme is critical
to our sustainability and delivery of
renewable energy over the long-term for
New Zealanders. The story of our Aratiatia
refurbishment is told later in this report.
We have continued a very strong run
on cost management with operational
expenditure (OPEX) remaining flat at
$214 million for five years. We are
forecasting to maintain the same levels
in FY2019.
TEAMWORK
We have invested in ourselves and our
teamwork this year, and the results are
strong. On the back of our FY2017
employee survey results we were assessed
as the best workplace in New Zealand
(IBM enterprise category, IBM Best
Workplace Awards). The internal aspects
of our rebranding to Mercury also resulted
in Mercury receiving recognition at the
New Zealand HR Awards 2018 for the
Workplace Engagement Programme of
the Year.
In FY2018 our people lifted their
engagement to even higher levels. Latterly,
this has been through the roll out of a High
Performance Team framework to support
inclusion, performance and alignment.
Our annual employee survey saw our
engagement index strengthen further
to 81.5% from last year’s 81%. The survey
also identified that 94% of our people
agree or strongly agree that Mercury is
committed to the health and safety of
our people. The highest employee survey
result was in response to the statement
that Mercury takes its environmental
responsibilities seriously (95.6%).
SAFETY, WELLBEING
AND INCLUSION
I am especially pleased that there were
no serious injuries for employees and
on-site contractors throughout the year,
particularly given the very high levels of
plant reinvestment activity. StayLive, a
large generator and transmission safety
information sharing group, received its
first external award. This co-operative
approach to safety, established by
Neal Barclay (now Chief Executive of
Meridian), Bob Weir (then Genesis
Energy) and myself eight years ago,
continues to provide real and growing
value to participants.
A very large safety investment was made
during the year resulting in the submission
of three geothermal safety cases to
WorkSafe for review, reflecting a process
safety approach at those sites. We are
also investing in process safety cases in
specific areas elsewhere in the business
for key customer and hydro risks.
Since rebranding two years ago, Mercury has continued to
accelerate the execution of its strategy to deliver customer
advocacy, leverage core strengths and achieve sustainable growth.
CUSTOMER,
COMMUNITY,
COUNTRY.
CHIEF EXECUTIVE’S UPDATE
FINANCIAL
COMMENTARY
OUR TEAM AND
STAKEHOLDERS
CHAIR AND
CHIEF EXECUTIVE
UPDATES
OUR
SUSTAINABILITY
STATEMENT
PILLARSCUSTOMER
PEOPLE
COMMERCIAL
PARTNERSHIPS
KAITIAKITANGA
BUSINESS
FUNDAMENTALS
12 // 13
Wellbeing and inclusion continue to
be focus areas that underpin effective
delivery of our strategy. They are reported
on further in the governance section of
this report.
On behalf of everyone at Mercury,
I acknowledge the passing during the
year of two employees who made a
wonderful contribution to Mercury,
Dave Keppel and Eucharist (Naisa)
Ng Shiu. Dave and Eucharist are
fondly remembered, and our thoughts
are with their families.
ENJOYING THE ENERGY
Our brand continues to strengthen, with
awareness and satisfaction measures
reaching record levels during FY2018.
This is in part driven by our campaign to
take the message about New Zealand’s
renewable energy advantage – and Energy
Freedom – from the head to the heart.
We have brought this to life through the
story of customers enjoying life through a
classic ’57 Ford Fairlane converted to the
wonderful energy of electricity thanks to:
a specialist Dunedin workshop, Control
Focus; a Hamilton power electronics
company, Scott Drive; a bus-strength
electric motor from Siemens, Germany;
and a lot of creativity from our marketing
team and our agency FCB.
More than 80% of New Zealanders
love our EV ad campaign which has
translated to record high positivity
toward Mercury.
There is a very important New Zealand
narrative behind Mercury’s extensive and
four-year strong campaign on electric
vehicles, namely the country’s Energy
Freedom. At our 2014 ASM we committed
to 70% of our vehicle fleet being electric in
2018. We achieved that one year early, with
one of New Zealand’s largest business
sector EV fleets of 91 vehicles. We also
predicted at the time that the number
of EV’s sold would exceed the number
of solar installations if the facts of the
environmental and economics benefits
became well known. This milestone was
reached for New Zealand in October 2017.
Mercury continues to focus on the things
our loyal customers tell us they want;
inspiring, rewarding and making things
easy for them.
WE HAVE CONTINUED A VERY
STRONG RUN ON COST MANAGEMENT
WITH OPERATIONAL EXPENDITURE
REMAINING FLAT AT $214M
FOR FIVE YEARS.
891
EMPLOYEES
94%
EMPLOYEES CONFIRM
MERCURY IS COMMITTED
TO HEALTH AND SAFETY,
COMPARED TO ALL
ORGANISATIONS
BENCHMARK OF 85%
91%
EMPLOYEES WHO CONFIRM
THAT MERCURY HAS A CLEAR
VISION OF WHERE IT IS
GOING, COMPARED TO 2017
ALL NZ ORGANISATIONS
BENCHMARK OF 76%
1
1 IBM Workplace Engagement Survey Benchmark
MORE THAN 93,000 CUSTOMERS ENJOY
DETAILED ENERGY USAGE DATA THROUGH
OUR GEM SYSTEM.
90K
CUSTOMERS ENJOYED A
JUNE FREE POWER DAY
Customers have continued to enjoy
wonderful experiences on e.bikes. More
than 1,200 people are estimated to have
ridden e.bikes at Mercury ride days, and
e.bike ownership continues to grow
strongly. A partnership with Big Street
Bikers in downtown Auckland introduced
a solar powered e.bike “rechargery”, a
bike-by-the-hour scheme, as well as
rent-to-buy options with discounts for
Mercury customers.
Mercury’s Free Power Day concept is
always well subscribed. Around 90,000
customers enjoyed a June Free Power
Day. One long-term customer and owner,
Mr Warren Johns, later in this report
wonderfully tells his story of how this day
inspired him to clean, bake and connect
with friends in his home of over 50 years.
INNOVATION
Our approach to innovation is to be
alongside our customers as
opportunities are tested and proven to
be viable, feasible and desirable – not
just one or other of these measures.
More than 93,000 customers enjoy
detailed energy usage data weekly
through our GEM system. Through GEM
our customers have, for more than five
years now, been able to understand their
energy consumption down to the
half-hour, receive estimates of their
consumption by usage in the home,
receive emails predicting their month
end bill and also weekly updates to help
them manage consumption in near real
time. We have launched a loyalty
focused customer app for smart devices,
the current release of which incorporates
access to these on-line GEM features.
Our digital experience (DX) team has
been working on smart device voice
activated services with Amazon’s Alexa,
the first energy company in New Zealand
to do so.
Many of our customers experienced
power outages during April’s storms.
Using our Incident Management Plan,
we implemented a widespread and
coordinated effort across our metering
and retail teams to minimise the
consequences to our customers. This
included placing a team from our
award-winning contact centre into a
network company to reduce its call
queues and creatively meshing smart
meter data to more accurately identify
affected homes to help network
companies with power restoration.
MEETING CUSTOMER
NEEDS
GLOBUG continues to be New Zealand’s
largest pre-pay electricity provider.
We work closely with various social
services around the provision of
this pre-pay product which, by
design, helps avoid the potential
for customers to build up
unmanageable debt.
GLOBUG gets considerable
media attention at times,
partly because of some of
the vulnerable customers
that it helps. We remain
committed to this product
for the role it plays in giving
consumers choice. GLOBUG
customer numbers, despite high
churn, are relatively flat year on year,
1,200
CUSTOMERS HAVE
ENJOYED RIDING
MERCURY E.BIKES
GLOBUG CONTINUES
TO BE NEW ZEALAND’S
LARGEST PRE-PAY
ELECTRICITY PROVIDER
FINANCIAL
COMMENTARY
OUR TEAM AND
STAKEHOLDERS
CHAIR AND
CHIEF EXECUTIVE
UPDATES
OUR
SUSTAINABILITY
STATEMENT
PILLARSCUSTOMER
PEOPLE
COMMERCIAL
PARTNERSHIPS
KAITIAKITANGA
BUSINESS
FUNDAMENTALS
14 // 15
showing that this is a very important
part of the market. The data clearly
shows that GLOBUG’s net impact is to
keep the lights on.
OUR VOICE
Consistent with my report last year, we
continue to work towards a reset of
distribution pricing settings and are
engaged in a number of trials with
network companies. We remain highly
focused on seeing New Zealand adopt
a low carbon energy target, and ideally
removing the renewable electricity target.
We will continue to promote the
electrification of transport, in its many
forms including heavy transport, as this
country’s greatest achievable opportunity
for reducing carbon emissions. We will
continue to engage with decision makers
to convey the importance of deep energy
storage for New Zealand’s security of
supply (and Energy Freedom).
We intend to ramp up our activity in
FY2019 to influence Government,
NGOs and the business sector to focus
on meaningful, scalable and connected
solutions to climate change which fit a
New Zealand context. I am concerned at
the tendency towards ‘window-dressing’
that masks big carbon emissions by
reporting small advances in reporting or
offsetting. “Every little bit” does not
always help when it results in countries
and their citizens misallocating their
time, effort and capital to tackle a global
issue which commands only our best
collective performance.
GUARDIANSHIP
Our ultra long-term approach has seen
us continue to focus on kaitiakitanga, or
guardianship, of the resources and
environment that support our
contribution to New Zealand.
During the year Mercury, working
alongside iwi partners and other
stakeholders, arranged a study tour of
Australia’s Murray/Darling catchment to
korero, grow relationships, and consider
how collaboratively we can support the
best long-term outcomes for the health
and wellbeing of New Zealand’s most
essential water catchment.
We also continue to invest in
maintaining our hydro and geothermal
assets. This important work builds on the
legacy of those who created them over
the course of nearly a century so that
they contribute the future of local
communities and to New Zealand for
many decades to come.
As but one example, at our Kawerau
geothermal station we replaced the
turbine after 10 years of service in the
largest planned shut undertaken at the
site. Ongoing curiosity, a common goal
and strong teamwork saw the plant
achieve daily records and make
sustainable production gains across the
year. On a recent visit I was delighted to
hear from Dean Cowell, who has been a
plant operator and technician of the
complex facility since opening in 2008,
express that the teamwork was the best
he had ever known it. There are many
similar stories of quality teamwork and
execution throughout Mercury.
GROWTH
In previous annual reports we have
outlined our strategy for growth. An
opportunity taken this year was the
purchase of a 19.99% stake in Tilt.
Tilt is well established in Australasia,
both in terms of its expertise and its
own growth through solar and wind
developments. This purchase allows
Mercury to benefit from Australia’s
necessary transition towards levels of
renewable electricity that New Zealand
has largely achieved. It fits within a
broader context of wind growth and
development, a journey we have been
on now for more than a decade.
Mercury also participated in AGL’s
divestment process to purchase their
smart metering business in Australia,
though we were unsuccessful.
19.99%
STAKE PURCHASED
IN TILT RENEWABLES
MARKET CONDITIONS
Wholesale market conditions have
become more volatile with the supply/
demand mix rebalancing in combination
with periods of average to below average
national hydrology. Such volatility plays
into the strengths of the Waikato Hydro
scheme, the North Island’s largest
peaking plant.
In FY2019 we look forward to New
Zealand's Aluminium Smelter (NZAS)
increasing national electricity demand
by more than 1% with the restart of its
fourth potline at Tiwai Point. This is a
positive development for New Zealand-
sourced aluminium relative to carbon
intensive Australian production.
CAPITAL STRUCTURE
We have strengthened our capital
structure by buying back $50 million
of Mercury shares for an average price
of $3.21 per share. In combination with
a buyback in 2014, we now have 2.7%
of Mercury’s shares as treasury stock,
meaning that existing shareholders
receive a larger proportion of the
company’s profits (reflected in a full
year dividend higher than guidance
for FY2018). It also enables Mercury
to re-issue those shares to more easily
raise equity capital to support both
opportunity and risk management.
Extensive hedging of interest rates
was taken out in 2008 prior to the
$1.4 billion domestic geothermal
development program. These are in
the process of rolling off, and we
expect a $20 million per annum benefit
to post-tax cashflow as interest costs
revert to current market levels.
Per our notification to all of our owners
in May, I apologise for the error which
saw owners’ email addresses and
Common Shareholder Numbers listed on
the Companies Office website for a time.
Once this error was identified we made
every effort to communicate this
transparently, quickly and clearly and
have changed the process for lodging
information to the Companies Office
to prevent a recurrence.
PARTNERSHIPS
Mercury’s partnership approach has
also created opportunities. This year we
announced a plan to trial New Zealand’s
first large scale, national grid connected,
battery electricity trading initiative.
Tesla successfully tendered for provision
of the battery, and our teams have been
working with the Electricity Authority,
Transpower and others to enable trading
back to the grid from the battery-stored
power. We look forward to sharing what
we learn over the next year following
commissioning in August 2018.
We have the largest partnerships with
commercial Maori entities of any NZX
company. The investment in geothermal
from those entities, ourselves and
Contact Energy of more than $3 billion
between 1996 and 2014 was responsible
for the displacement of large quantities
of base load thermal generation from
the New Zealand electricity system.
This drove the largest reduction in
New Zealand’s total greenhouse gas
emissions over that decade and made
geothermal, the only commercial
weather independent renewable fuel
system, the number two source of
electricity in New Zealand, behind hydro.
$112M
STAY-IN-BUSINESS CAPITAL
EXPENDITURE INCLUDED
DELIVERY OF KEY
TECHNOLOGY PROJECTS AND
PLANT REFURBISHMENT
WE HAVE THE LARGEST
PARTNERSHIPS WITH
COMMERCIAL MAORI
ENTITIES OF ANY NZX
COMPANY.
FINANCIAL
COMMENTARY
OUR TEAM AND
STAKEHOLDERS
CHAIR AND
CHIEF EXECUTIVE
UPDATES
OUR
SUSTAINABILITY
STATEMENT
PILLARSCUSTOMER
PEOPLE
COMMERCIAL
PARTNERSHIPS
KAITIAKITANGA
BUSINESS
FUNDAMENTALS
16 // 17
THIS YEAR WE ANNOUNCED A PLAN
TO TRIAL NEW ZEALAND’S FIRST
LARGE SCALE, NATIONAL GRID
CONNECTED, BATTERY ELECTRICITY
TRADING INITIATIVE.
In combination with New Zealand’s first
and largest carbon off-take tender in
2010 of circa $100 million over 15 years
covering some 10,000 hectares linked to
specific new growth forests, Mercury is
carbon positive (our carbon offsets
exceed our carbon creation). Our
approach is to address those things that
make a difference with substantive
action, and we will continue to challenge
“window dressing” by those who should
be doing more.
We acknowledge and recently celebrated
the recent 20-year anniversary of the
Rotokawa geothermal facility which was
opened on 27 June 1998 by the late
Kurupai Whata of Ngati Tahu, a mana
whenua of the area.
OUR PROGRAMME
OF WORK
Last year’s annual report (p18)
highlighted the key initiatives across our
brand, digital assets, generation assets
and people we expected to complete in
FY2018. All have been achieved.
For FY2019 we highlight the following
key activities:
• Continuing to promote New Zealand’s
competitive advantage in low-cost
renewable energy to key Government
and regulatory decision makers,
• Actively investing in material growth
strategies,
• Embedding our High Performance
Team framework,
• Ongoing development of our brand,
customer loyalty and digital offerings,
• Ongoing major hydro refurbishment
at Aratiatia, Whakamaru and Karapiro,
• Research and development
projects including the grid scale
battery, solar product development,
silica extraction from geothermal
fluids and e-mobility extensions,
• Further leverage of our metering
data services platforms,
• Resolving long-standing distribution
pricing signals for retailers that are
compatible with new technology,
• Enhancing the long-term water
quality of the Waikato Catchment.
OUTLOOK
We have started FY2019 strongly. With
quality execution against our clear
mission and strategy from an engaged
Mercury team we expect to grow value
for our consumers, communities, people,
country and owners this year.
Over the past four years we have taken
very deliberate steps to simplify and
reinvest in the business. The core
business is performing strongly, though
delivering only incremental growth in a
very challenging retail environment. We
expect to take more meaningful steps
towards growth in the next couple of
years. However, as we have demonstrated
in the last few years, a commercially
disciplined approach is essential.
We continue to listen carefully to all of
our stakeholders, in particular the new
Government, with its focus on value,
fairness and choice for customers;
renewable energy; and the regional
economy. We have been delivering in
these areas and will ensure that they
continue to be emphasised.
On behalf of everyone at Mercury I thank
you again for being part of our story.
There is much more to be done to
achieve our mission of Energy Freedom,
and progress is very encouraging.
Together we are Mercury.
Energy made wonderful.
Nga mihi nui ki a koutou katoa.
FRASER WHINERAY, CHIEF EXECUTIVE
During FY2018 Mercury reviewed its approach to integrating sustainability. The starting
point was a discussion around the need for a specific statement: something that
conveyed simply and concisely our view of sustainability as an essential element of the
way we operate, Our Direction.
The resulting statement (above) speaks of Energy Freedom, our mission, and also our
vision of sustainability, not just for Mercury, but for New Zealand. Internally it is
supported by five pillars: customer, people, commercial, partnerships and kaitiakitanga;
and associated focus areas. Our statement signals clearly that we fully intend to build
on our proud history for the next century and beyond.
SUSTAINABILITY AT MERCURY IS ABOUT
ENERGY FREEDOM, BUILT ON OUR
FIVE PILLARS OF CUSTOMER, PEOPLE,
COMMERCIAL, PARTNERSHIPS AND
KAITIAKITANGA. OUR HISTORY GOES
BACK ALMOST ONE HUNDRED YEARS
AND WE INTEND TO BE HERE FOR AT
LEAST A HUNDRED MORE.”
OUR
SUSTAINABILITY
STATEMENT.
18 // 19
FINANCIAL
COMMENTARY
OUR TEAM AND
STAKEHOLDERS
CHAIR AND
CHIEF EXECUTIVE
UPDATES
OUR
SUSTAINABILITY
STATEMENT
PILLARSCUSTOMER
PEOPLE
COMMERCIAL
PARTNERSHIPS
KAITIAKITANGA
BUSINESS
FUNDAMENTALS
FOCUS AREAS:
Brand
Loyalty
Experience
FOCUS AREAS:
Operational
Excellence
Generation Development
Sustainable Growth
FOCUS AREAS:
Natural Resources
Climate Change
Assets
FOCUS AREAS:
High Performance
Teams
Safety and
Wellbeing
Capability and
Development
FOCUS AREAS:
Industry/Research
Iwi
Government
INTEGRATED THINKING
Mercury understands that integrating sustainability means
taking an ultra long-term view which guides our thinking, our
business planning and the way we operate on a day to day basis.
In FY2018 we took a step back, conducting a detailed review of
past disclosures, included revisiting our stakeholders, their
expectations of us and the things that they consider important.
The result is a simplification of the language used to describe
our five pillars and the refinement of associated focus areas.
The focus areas are a consolidation and rationalisation of the
twenty-two elements of a materiality matrix included in our
FY2017 annual report.
The executive then challenged themselves to consider the
future and created statements, for each of the focus areas to
succinctly describe what success will look like in 2028 if we
have met stakeholder expectations. Theses ten-year forward
statements continue to be worked on and through FY2019 will
be shared and discussed more widely with our people and our
stakeholders.
PILLAR:
COMMERCIAL
PILLAR:
CUSTOMER
Inspire, reward,
make it easy
PILLAR:
PEOPLE
PILLAR:
PARTNERSHIPS
PILLAR:
KAITIAKITANGA
FINANCIAL
COMMENTARY
OUR TEAM AND
STAKEHOLDERS
CHAIR AND
CHIEF EXECUTIVE
UPDATES
OUR
SUSTAINABILITY
STATEMENT
PILLARSCUSTOMER
PEOPLE
COMMERCIAL
PARTNERSHIPS
KAITIAKITANGA
BUSINESS
FUNDAMENTALS
INTEGRATED
REPORTING <IR>
Mercury continues to integrate
sustainable business practice, refining
our approach and the language used, to
enable transparent and easily understood
disclosures. We think it important to
clearly convey our views and intentions.
To ensure our future disclosures meet
the expectations of shareholders and
investors we mapped our pillars and
focus areas against the International
Integrated Reporting Framework <IR>.
The <IR> requires organisations to reflect
on six capitals that are essential for value
creation. The capitals: natural, social and
relational, manufactured, intellectual,
human and financial, also need to be
considered from the perspective of
minimising future risks to the business
or “value destruction”.
The process resulted in Mercury being
able to map a close correlation between
our focus areas and the six capitals. It
also confirms we can continue to report
and communicate our performance in a
language that is already very familiar to
our internal and external stakeholders.
As a first step the scorecard is being
used to review all FY2019 to FY2023
business unit plans and create a
rolled-up group plan.
NEXT STEPS
The first step was to take our pillars and
focus areas and create a sustainability
scorecard. The scorecard: informs and
guides the internal business planning
process; provides a consistent approach
to shorter term, one and three-year
planning cycles and enables Mercury to
continue to embrace, and further
integrate, sustainability.
We have already started to engage our
people on integrating sustainability with
specific workshops and presentations to
enterprise and business leaders,
supported by internal communications.
They are therefore directly involved in
looking at existing and potentially new key
performance indicators (KPIs), measures
of success and targets that Mercury can
use to measure its performance.
This annual report is another example of
a channel to communicate our
intentions and inform and educate our
stakeholders, including our owners, and
we welcome any feedback you may have.
We have included the symbols that
represent our five pillars throughout this
report to reflect the integrated thinking
now underway.
We will continue to develop our use of
the integrated reporting framework and
other frameworks such as GRI and the
United Nations Sustainable Development
Goals (SDGs) to ensure our disclosures
reflect global standards.
Taking this comprehensive approach to
integrating sustainability reduces
business risks, identifies potential
opportunities and guides engagement
with all our stakeholders. We will
continue to review and report openly and
honestly on our performance on a
regular basis to ensure the utmost
transparency and we look forward to
sharing our progress with you.
<IR> capitals weighted to
Mercury’s Focus Areas
SOCIAL RELATIONAL 27%
INTELLECTUAL 4%
FINANCIAL 28%
HUMAN 11%
MANUFACTURED 15%
NATURAL 15%
20 // 21
24 HOURS OF
WONDERFUL
ENERGY.
Friday 6 June, 0005 hours. It might be the small hours of
the morning, but one home in Auckland is glowing with light.
A washing machine starts its first cycle of woolly jumpers,
bedding and tea towels.
Friday 6 June, 0010 hours. A stove switches on, and a pot
of pea and ham soup is underway.
Friday 6 June, 0025 hours. On goes a heater. It stays on
for another 19 hours. The oven starts, ready for three fruit cakes
and a loaf, all waiting to be baked.
And so begins Warren Johns’ day. He
had his Free Power Day booked for 6
June and was up at 12 o’clock that
morning to make the most of it.
Seven loads of washing completed.
Four cakes baked to share with friends.
Two hot baths while the rain pattered
outside. One batch of slow cooked
lamb shanks simmering in the oven.
All of this inside a warm toasty house
with National Radio playing in the
background.
Each of these activities by themselves
might not seem like much but together
they become something quite special
– showing how electricity really delivers
a whole host of wonderful options.
Mr Johns, who lives in his family home,
has continued the relationship his parents
had with us as the original owners of his
home. All up, they’ve been loyal Mercury
customers for nearly 20 years – right
back to day one of our company’s history.
He is also one of our investors.
Our relationship with him has grown over
time thanks to a series of inspiring,
customer-focused initiatives. Our newest
advocate for electric vehicles – a 1957
Ford Fairlane converted to plug-in electric
and christened Evie – is another great
example of “energy made wonderful”.
A self-confessed vintage and classic car
enthusiast, Mr Johns saw Evie at the
‘Galaxy of Cars’ show earlier this year. It
reminded him of his father’s 1937 Ford
V8 Coupe. So he talked to our
Mercury team, who were on site,
about Evie's vitals:
| 2.2 m wide | 5.5m long | 2.2 tonnes |
218 battery cells | 50 kWh capacity |
2 hour charging |
He has had a number of conversations
with us during his time with Mercury,
but never about a car.
It is a powerful illustration of how our
customer promise – to inspire, reward
and make things easy – has value across
the business. Through partnerships and
connecting it helps us learn about
what customers expect and value,
and that guides innovation. It also
allows us to show people the real value
of New Zealand’s renewable energy.
CUSTOMER
22 // 23
FINANCIAL
COMMENTARY
OUR TEAM AND
STAKEHOLDERS
CHAIR AND
CHIEF EXECUTIVE
UPDATES
OUR
SUSTAINABILITY
STATEMENT
PILLARSCUSTOMER
PEOPLE
COMMERCIAL
PARTNERSHIPS
KAITIAKITANGA
BUSINESS
FUNDAMENTALS
VISIT OUR FACEBOOK PAGE FOR MORE
STORIES OF WHAT OUR CUSTOMERS
DID WITH THEIR FREE POWER DAYS.
Please visit facebook.com/mercurynz
90K
FREE POWER
DAYS ENJOYED
42K
FACEBOOK
ENGAGEMENTS
420K
CONVERSATIONS
WITH OUR
CUSTOMERS
24 // 25
FINANCIAL
COMMENTARY
OUR TEAM AND
STAKEHOLDERS
CHAIR AND
CHIEF EXECUTIVE
UPDATES
OUR
SUSTAINABILITY
STATEMENT
PILLARSCUSTOMER
PEOPLE
COMMERCIAL
PARTNERSHIPS
KAITIAKITANGA
BUSINESS
FUNDAMENTALS
EVIE’S STORY
Evie is our beautiful 1957 Ford Fairlane,
converted from a gas guzzler to plug-in
electric.
She is the poster-child for electric
vehicles, and really brings Mercury’s
mission, Energy Freedom, to life. We
think she is the perfect symbol of our
escape from the cost (environmental and
financial) and reliance on fossil fuels.
We have long promoted the rational
benefits of electric vehicles to New
Zealanders. At an equivalent of 30c per
litre compared with petrol and delivering
2,000kgs in annual reductions in carbon
emissions, they’ve always been an easy
decision for the head.
WARREN’S STORY
Mr Johns’ story came to our attention
after he wrote to Fraser, Mercury’s Chief
Executive, to outline how he used his
Free Power Day, his appreciation of Evie
and the wonderful ways he has
interacted with our people.
Upon receiving the letter, Fraser called
Mr Johns to thank him for sharing the
story of his wonderful day. As part of
Mr Johns’ letter he also told us how
much he would love to go for a drive in
Evie one day. It was an opportunity we
couldn’t resist, so on 7 August we took
him for a ride around his neighbourhood.
See what happened when we picked him
up at: http://bit.ly/evieandwarren
Converting this classic was a way for us
to start capturing people’s hearts as well.
Evie helps people see how wonderful
electric vehicles can be.
We plan to use Evie to continue to
showcase the outstanding opportunity
New Zealand has to achieve energy
freedom through renewable electricity
powering our transport. If we raise our
sights beyond renewable electricity
targets to our overall renewable energy
use, particularly across the transport and
industrial sectors, our country could take
major steps towards reducing our overall
greenhouse gas emissions and
dramatically reduce the cost that
imported fuel has on households and
the New Zealand economy.
FIND OUT MORE ABOUT
EVIE’S STORY.
Please visit mercury.co.nz/evie
NEW THINKING AND
HIGH PERFORMANCE
TEAMS.
Three graduates (from AUT and MIT) joined Mercury
during the year as part of a programme to attract new
skills and thinking to our business while introducing our
sector to potential future leaders. The graduates spent
their first few months engaging directly with customers
in Mercury’s award-winning Contact Centre.
The graduates brought up-to-the-minute IT skills, fresh
thinking and energy. They gained and then have been
able to share with Mercury a fresh perspective and their
valuable understanding of our customers.
Our Contact Centre teams also benefitted from having
the IT graduates onboard. They contributed to process
improvements and a new system for working with
customers.
The Digital Experience (DX) team are early adopters of
Mercury’s High Performance Team framework and have
utilised this in integrating the graduates into their team.
Siobhan Flynn, a Mercury Information Communication
and Technology (ICT) graduate, and Maurice van
Leeuwen, Senior Business Analyst, ICT - Digital Delivery,
tell their stories.
Mercury’s Attitude (our values):
COMMIT AND OWN IT
SHARE AND CONNECT
CURIOUS AND ORIGINAL
PEOPLE
26 // 27
FINANCIAL
COMMENTARY
OUR TEAM AND
STAKEHOLDERS
CHAIR AND
CHIEF EXECUTIVE
UPDATES
OUR
SUSTAINABILITY
STATEMENT
PILLARSCUSTOMER
PEOPLE
COMMERCIAL
PARTNERSHIPS
KAITIAKITANGA
BUSINESS
FUNDAMENTALS
SIOBHAN FLYNN
ICT GRADUATE
I started as a graduate in the ICT team last August.
I’m definitely a ‘people person’. When I was at school and studying I worked for eight years
part time in retail. I loved the customers, and now I work for Mercury it’s still all about the
connections with the people I work with, as well as knowing that the work makes a positive
difference for our customers.
One of the things that attracted me to Mercury was our
commitment to renewable energy. It’s great that Mercury
cares about what’s happening in the world, and it’s
something that people of my generation particularly relate
to. It’s rewarding to see from the inside the different ways
that Mercury tries to connect with its customers and to
think about power in different ways such as through Evie,
the classic car converted to run on electricity.
Mercury seems ready to change as the world changes.
I started off with three months in Mercury’s customer
Contact Centre. This is the first time Mercury started ICT
graduates there, and it’s an amazing way of getting to
understand the business, and actually meeting (on the
phones) a lot of Mercury customers.
New Contact Centre team members have a full four-week
induction, with lots of support for learning and there’s a
really uplifting spirit evident. In all the teams I’ve been in
there’s a feeling of being able to express yourself and be
who you really are at work, and I really like the
encouragement of individuality.
Right from the beginning in the Contact Centre, we were
asked to keep a list of anything that raised a question for
us in terms of process, systems, or how they were working.
At the end of our time there we had a meeting with the
manager and the team leads and ran through the list. We
really felt that they listened.
Starting off in the Contact Centre now helps my ICT roles.
I’m able to connect what I learned about the business and
our customers with how our IT systems and processes
impact our customers. An example is knowing the
experience our customers have when they join us. It’s been
great to have that fresh knowledge that I can share with
the rest of the ICT team.
My managers also really encourage Mercury’s 'Curious and
Original' Attitude. If there’s something I don’t understand,
or something I think isn’t quite right, I ask. My managers
have told me: “you’re here to shake up the status quo and
challenge us”. I’ve felt very empowered that I can speak up.
79%
OF EMPLOYEES AGREE THAT THIS
ORGANISATION ENCOURAGES
IDEAS AND SUGGESTIONS ON HOW
TO IMPROVE THE WAY THINGS ARE
DONE, COMPARED TO 2017 NZ ALL
ORGS BENCHMARK 71%
84%
OF EMPLOYEES AGREE THAT
COOPERATION BETWEEN
TEAMS IS ENCOURAGED IN
THIS ORGANISATION,
COMPARED TO 2017 NZ ALL
ORGS BENCHMARK OF 71%
5,100
OUR ATTITUDE E-CARDS
SENT BY EMPLOYEES TO
THEIR PEERS
527
MERCURY PEOPLE
COMPLETED AT LEAST
ONE OF OUR 69
DEVELOPMENT TRAINING
EVENTS IN FY2018
87%
OF LEADERS COMPLETED
TRAINING ON BUILDING HIGH
PERFORMANCE TEAMS
A high performance
team is a diverse group
of individuals who all have
opinions and different
thinking styles, and who
are supported to give their
best to achieve great results.
We use the collective
brain power of the team
to make things easy for
our customers – faster.
28 // 29
FINANCIAL
COMMENTARY
OUR TEAM AND
STAKEHOLDERS
CHAIR AND
CHIEF EXECUTIVE
UPDATES
OUR
SUSTAINABILITY
STATEMENT
PILLARSCUSTOMER
PEOPLE
COMMERCIAL
PARTNERSHIPS
KAITIAKITANGA
BUSINESS
FUNDAMENTALS
More and more of our customers are choosing to engage with Mercury through our digital
channels. I am a member of the Digital Experience (DX) team. We work mainly on the
Mercury website and the online customer portal My Account, to make these experiences easier
and more streamlined for our customers. That’s how we connect to Mercury’s mission of
Energy Freedom. This makes business sense too, as it differentiates us from our competitors.
79%
OF EMPLOYEES AGREE THAT
THE FEEDBACK AND
COACHING THEY GET HELPS
THEM TO IMPROVE THEIR
PERFORMANCE, COMPARED
TO 2017 NZ ALL ORGS
BENCHMARK OF 67%
89%
OF EMPLOYEES CONFIRM
THAT MERCURY CARES
ABOUT THE WELLBEING OF
ITS PEOPLE, COMPARED
WITH 2017 NZ ALL ORGS
BENCHMARK OF 79%
JOIN THE TEAM AT MERCURY.
SEE OUR CAREERS PAGES.
Please visit mercury.co.nz/careers
There are seven of us in the team, representing different areas
of ICT. But it’s actually much bigger than that. The work we do
is informed by our colleagues from Marketing, Customer
Insights and the Contact Centre. They get feedback and ideas
from our customers and that filters through to us, to make the
technical changes.
I really enjoy working with the different Mercury teams,
and that the work we do has a positive impact on our
customers. It makes it easier for them to engage with Mercury.
The other thing I enjoy is the different way of working in the
DX team. In the digital world we know we need to move very
fast. With advances in technology, a year-long project might not
end up being the best solution for our customers. Our new way
of working delivers small bites of new features and continually
assesses whether we’re doing the best thing for our customers.
Every two weeks we make a plan for what we’re going to do,
with the goal to build, test and roll out something useful.
For this approach to work, the DX team members have to
have both the ability and the willingness to communicate.
This means actively contributing to discussions and also
listening respectfully to other points of view.
We also need to be able to deal with uncertainty.
Sometimes you’ve got to give something a go without
being sure of success. The two week pace of what we
deliver forces us to do that because you haven’t always
got time to explore things into the real nitty gritty detail.
The other thing is resilience. Sometimes things don’t work out.
But you learn from that and then you go forward.
I enjoy working with graduates like Siobhan. They are smart and
enthusiastic and they pick things up quickly. They’re keen to give
things a go, and they own the job and carry it through to the end.
Sometimes they’ll see things from a different perspective.
Because they’ve had experience in a different part of the
business such as the Mercury Contact Centre, they bring direct
customer focus to our team through that experience and their
conversations with customers.
The graduates ask us questions that make us question
ourselves and the way we work. It’s a real opportunity for us as a
team to talk about what we do and to learn. Sometimes you get
into a routine and it’s only when someone new comes in that
you really look at how you’re doing something. You’re delivering
stuff together, and also learning as well.
MAURICE VAN LEEUWEN
SENIOR BUSINESS ANALYST
ICT – DIGITAL DELIVERY
COMMERCIAL
KEEPING THE
POWER COMING.
A lot happens between when a raindrop falls on New Zealand’s
Central Plateau and when, 425 kilometres later after flowing
down the Waikato River, it enters the Tasman Sea. Along that
journey the water contributes to diverse ecosystems, it is enjoyed
for recreation, and some is diverted for drinking water not only for
people in towns along the way, and the city of Hamilton that it
flows through, but for New Zealand’s largest city, Auckland.
From Lake Taupo the water also drops
just over 350m to sea level: slightly more
than the height of Auckland’s Sky Tower.
That’s where Mercury comes in:
harnessing the energy as gravity exerts
its force on that water.
Mercury’s hydro generation on the
Waikato River can be traced back to
the commissioning of the Arapuni Dam
(1929), with the ninth and final station
commissioned in 1970 (Maraetai II).
The Waikato Hydro system feeds
electricity to the national grid to meet
around 10% of the New Zealand’s
electricity needs. The hydro stations,
along with our geothermal stations, are
also the commercial backbone of our
business. Over the past five financial
years, hydro has contributed 58% of
our total generation. With a view to
our overall ultra-long term sustainability
we understand our duty of care to this
critical infrastructure.
This year our multi-year, multi-million
dollar reinvestment in the Waikato Hydro
scheme passed several milestones,
including completing the successful
upgrade of the first of three units at the
Aratiatia hydro power station.
The 78MW Aratiatia station,
13 kilometres downstream from Taupo
township, was commissioned in 1964.
The Aratiatia Rapids above the station,
which have functioned as the dam’s
spillway since commissioning, are rated
as one of Taupo's top tourist sights,
showcasing a fraction of the power
harnessed by the station's three
generating units. From the beginning,
extra work and innovation has been
needed to optimise the station’s output.
Paul Betschart, Lead Engineer to the
project, has been with Mercury for 10
years, and joined the Aratiatia upgrade
project in 2015.
“We’re at the point now where a lot of the
original equipment has given all that we
could have expected in terms of service
life,” says Paul. “Replacement of parts
was identified as the best way forward for
reliability, risk avoidance and efficiency.”
Improving the station’s long-term
performance and sustainability
motivated the way the project was
implemented. The overhaul focused on
the huge machinery that harnesses the
energy from the water, turning it into
I selected my degree at
university knowing that I
was interested in science
and engineering. I joined
Mercury as a graduate,
and now I’m a Senior
Engineer on our hydro
power stations. I’ve been
here 10 years and I can’t
think of anything else that
I’d rather be doing.
PAUL BETSCHART
LEAD ENGINEER
30 // 31
FINANCIAL
COMMENTARY
OUR TEAM AND
STAKEHOLDERS
CHAIR AND
CHIEF EXECUTIVE
UPDATES
OUR
SUSTAINABILITY
STATEMENT
PILLARSCUSTOMER
PEOPLE
COMMERCIAL
PARTNERSHIPS
KAITIAKITANGA
BUSINESS
FUNDAMENTALS
G2 HAS 31.5MW
GENERATOR CAPABILITY
and discharges over
100 tonnes of water per
second at full load
150TONNES
OF ROTATING EQUIPMENT
IN EACH OF THE THREE
GENERATING UNITS
OVER
The Aratiatia upgrade project is supported
by Mercury teams from our Taupo,
Hamilton, Rotorua and Auckland offices.
An extra 40 engineers and other specialists
will call the Taupo District home while
they partner with us on this project, and
around 20 businesses in and around the
Taupo area supply painting, transport,
welding, engineering, machining
and catering services.
There have been no
notifiable injuries.
FULL PROJECT
COMPLETION:
2020
TOTAL EXPENDITURE:
$49M
1008
TECHNICAL DOCUMENTS
SUBMITTED BY ANDRITZ
Including 444 drawings, and
5243 email communications
between Andritz and the
Mercury team
32 // 33
FINANCIAL
COMMENTARY
OUR TEAM AND
STAKEHOLDERS
CHAIR AND
CHIEF EXECUTIVE
UPDATES
OUR
SUSTAINABILITY
STATEMENT
PILLARSCUSTOMER
PEOPLE
COMMERCIAL
PARTNERSHIPS
KAITIAKITANGA
BUSINESS
FUNDAMENTALS
THE MERCURY PROJECT TEAM
OWN THE LONGER-TERM VIEW.
WE UNDERSTAND WHAT WE
WANT AS A WHOLE PLANT,
OVER A 50-YEAR LIFE.
members worked with Andritz in Austria
to discuss the preliminary design.
Manufacturing took place in foundries
and factories across the globe: Austria,
Germany, China, Czech Republic,
Hungary, Italy and India. And once
manufacture started the quality
assurance process started too.
“This is mechanically and electrically
stressed equipment. Safety and
performance depends on the design, the
materials and the execution. We had
reviewed the design, and then we
reviewed the materials and execution,”
says Paul.
Raw performance in terms of
megawatt (MW) output is guaranteed
in the contract. A lot of the work
throughout the design, manufacture
and installation of the machinery goes
beyond output, however, Paul says.
It’s about long-term performance,
making sure this plant will run as long
as possible, be easy to maintain, be safe
and be as reliable as possible.
Paul explains: “Our project partners
are on the same page and focused
on delivering a quality product. But we,
as the Mercury project team, own the
longer-term view. We understand what
we want as a whole plant, over a 50-year
life. Sometimes our experience and our
preferences lead to a different approach.
But it was all about teams working
together to get the best outcome.”
Installation of the first unit, G2, began
in October 2017, with return to service
completed in June 2018. Turning the
unit back on was itself a month-long
project. “Commissioning is pretty full on.
It’s both very well planned and managed,
and at the same time there’s quite a lot
of initiative required when you deal with
issues in real time.”
The three-year installation project means
there’s not a lot of time to pause and
contemplate the progress so far. Each of
the three units to be overhauled takes
around six months. Balancing complex
commercial, consumer and country
imperatives mean these stages are
timed to avoid having machines out of
action during New Zealand’s winter
energy demand peak, while working with
scheduled maintenance of other stations
on the river. Parts for Aratiatia’s next unit
to be overhauled arrived in July for
assembly. The G1 generator with its new
optimised low-flow turbine is scheduled
to return to service May 2019, and the
final unit, G3, will start its overhaul in
spring that year.
“Commissioning G2 was a huge
milestone,” says Paul. “Most of us were
looking forward to some downtime to
recharge. But everyone’s keen to take
what we learned and apply it to the
next two units.”
The outcome is a well-planned, safely
delivered project that returns the
generating units to operational service
with optimised capability incorporating
appropriate technology, resulting in long-
term reliability and sustainable operations
at Aratiatia for many years to come.
mechanical power and then electrical
power. After over 50 years of innovation,
tweaks and fixes, the project’s aim is to
safely restore and reconfigure the station
to deliver maximum value from current
and expected future operating
conditions. This has involved some very
creative approaches.
Paul explains: “The generators were
getting more prone to faults. That can
cost us generation time. The governors
that control the speed and output of the
turbine (like setting cruise control on a
modern car) could be updated with new
technology. And the turbines themselves,
the spinning water wheels and all the
equipment around them, were also in
need of attention.”
Long term, commercial thinking led to
the decision to replace one of the
station’s three turbines with a unit
specially configured to run at a lower
rate of water flow than that sustainable
with the old turbine design. This means
water use can be optimised when low
station flows are required, while still
retaining over 90% of the maximum
power capability of the old turbines and
also delivering a significant increase in
energy conversion efficiency. It was
decided to defer investment on replacing
the other two turbines until 2036, with
this long date giving Mercury additional
flexibility in its long-term planning.
Effective modernisation and
enhancement projects take time.
The contract was awarded to partner
Andritz in October 2015, two years of
assessment, planning, design, testing
and manufacture before the installation
of components. Paul and other team
GO SOLAR.
GET A QUOTE ONLINE OR
PHONE 0800 676 527.
Please visit mercury.co.nz/solar
For many of these individuals, our pre-pay brand GLOBUG is
sought as a tool to manage electricity – it breaks down
the barriers to reconnection, helps people avoid the spiral of
debt and can be paid for in small, manageable amounts.
While initially a sceptic of GLOBUG (and the sector in
general), continuous engagement with Brian has allowed our
relationship to evolve into one of collaboration. Together, we find
better solutions for our mutual customers, with dignity always
at the heart.
Brian is fundamental to our understanding of how we can best
support these individuals. In short, he is our eyes and ears, and
a voice for those who sometimes struggle to be heard.
Most recently Brian drew our attention to an increase in people
seeking support from the Fund, coinciding with the onslaught of
some bracingly cold winter weather. These insights allowed us to
work with the Mayor’s Welfare Fund on a solution for GLOBUG
customers. We ensured no disconnections occurred while working
with the Mayor’s fund at this critical time.
It is not the first time we’ve done this with Brian’s intel, and we do
not expect it to be the last.
Well-informed decisions like these enable us to maintain the
integrity of one of our core foundations – the wellbeing of our
customers. It is a value entirely aligned with Brian’s own
imperatives.
It is also a commercially astute decision, helping our customers
see the value of continuing to choose GLOBUG as their electricity
provider.
“I have worked with vulnerable people for years. Without GLOBUG
many of the at-risk households I support would be without
electricity and further disadvantaged. Electricity is a basic human
need – it is absolutely vital to our health, wellbeing and income.”
CONNECTING
WITH
COMMUNITIES.
Brian Pegler works for the Christchurch City Council’s Mayor’s Welfare Fund, which plays an integral
role in supporting vulnerable people in Christchurch.
PARTNERSHIPS
34 // 35
FINANCIAL
COMMENTARY
OUR TEAM AND
STAKEHOLDERS
CHAIR AND
CHIEF EXECUTIVE
UPDATES
OUR
SUSTAINABILITY
STATEMENT
PILLARSCUSTOMER
PEOPLE
COMMERCIAL
PARTNERSHIPS
KAITIAKITANGA
BUSINESS
FUNDAMENTALS
ELECTRICITY IS A BASIC
HUMAN NEED – IT IS
ABSOLUTELY VITAL TO
OUR HEALTH, WELLBEING
AND INCOME.
DONATE TO STARSHIP
Please visit
starship.org.nz/mercury
BRIAN PEGLER
CHRISTCHURCH CITY COUNCIL
MAYOR’S WELFARE FUND
Helen joined Mercury twenty years ago as an analyst,
helping the business transition onto a new data
platform. However, the trajectory of her career changed
dramatically when she realised her passion was in
supporting individuals and families who needed help.
Now, Helen leads Mercury’s community relations team and is
tasked with helping improve the wellbeing of our most vulnerable
customers by partnering with other groups like Christchurch’s
Mayor’s Welfare Fund.
Her role is unique, in that it covers customer support at an
individual level, grassroots community involvement, and also
engagement with key government agencies and stakeholders.
Helen believes having flexibility to navigate these multiple
touchpoints with fluidity sets Mercury apart in its community
engagement practices.
With a nationwide focus, Helen sees first-hand how diverse
communities across the country are. Each has its own unique set
of challenges and opportunities. A common thread is the
unconditional love, care and support for the families in these
close-knit groups. These insights highlight that a one-size-fits-all
approach doesn’t serve these families and individuals as well as
targeted and focused support.
Essential to achieving better outcomes is a fulsome view of the
different pressure points a family may be facing, along with the
acceptance that electricity accessibility is often one of the many
balls these families are struggling to keep in the air.
“Partnerships are a path we follow. Along that path there are
gates we go through and each gate is another organisation with
information to help us get to our destination – helping a family
get back on track. These voices are important to us finding
collective solutions that ease pressure in a more holistic and
sustainable way.”
HELEN TUA
MERCURY
COMMUNITY RELATIONS MANAGER
36 // 37
FINANCIAL
COMMENTARY
OUR TEAM AND
STAKEHOLDERS
CHAIR AND
CHIEF EXECUTIVE
UPDATES
OUR
SUSTAINABILITY
STATEMENT
PILLARSCUSTOMER
PEOPLE
COMMERCIAL
PARTNERSHIPS
KAITIAKITANGA
BUSINESS
FUNDAMENTALS
In a world where environmental, social and
economic systems are inextricably linked, no
organisation can operate successfully in isolation.
This interconnectivity means the actions we take
create far-reaching ripples, and seemingly small
decisions are easily magnified. That is why
‘partnerships’ is one of our five pillars.
Mercury’s approach to partnerships is extensively
applied across our business. Whether it is
operating our hydro and geothermal assets,
serving our customers or looking after our people,
working with others contributes to better, more
sustainable outcomes.
$100K
DONATED THROUGH
OUR EMPLOYEE
COMMUNITY FUND
$900K
DONATED TO STARSHIP
94%
OF OUR PEOPLE SAY
WE MAKE A POSITIVE
CONTRIBUTION TO
OUR COMMUNITIES
FIND OUT MORE ABOUT HOW
WE WORK IN PARTNERSHIP
WITH IWI, STARSHIP, WAIKATO RIVER
TRAILS AND MANY OTHERS.
Please visit mercury.co.nz/partnerships
Plump kererū (wood pigeon),
rare kārearea (New Zealand
falcon), kōtare (kingfisher),
ruru (morepork) and
pīwakawaka (fantail) call
through the thick regenerating
scrubby bush, secondary
beech and broadleaf forest,
manuka and remnant stands
of beech and northern rata
trees of Pigeon Bush Reserve.
Remote and isolated, the 1,157-hectare
reserve lies between the Remutaka and
Tararua Conservation Parks west of
Featherston in the South Wairarapa.
This steep, rugged land had been almost
completely cleared and intensively
farmed since the 1860s, but is returning
to dense forest after being bought,
protected and managed by the Native
Forest Restoration Trust since 1995.
The Trust is a leading organisation
in the protection and restoration of
New Zealand’s native forest. It is
committed to promoting the
regeneration of forests, protecting
native species and restoring their
habitats, and to improving the quality
of New Zealand’s waterways. Through a
ground-breaking commercial agreement
in 2012, Mercury has supported the
Trust’s work in this and some of the
other 7,000 hectares of native forests
and wetlands throughout New Zealand
it has purchased and protected.
The carbon credits that Mercury
purchases from the Trust come from the
regenerating native forest in Pigeon
Bush Reserve. The trees in the Reserve
are regularly measured and the extra
growth is calculated and converted into
carbon units, based on the age, size,
and type of tree.
Mercury has ten agreements that
support different New Zealand forestry
projects to offset carbon produced by
Mercury. The contract with the Native
Forest Restoration Trust was not only
commercially attractive, it stood out for its
strong alignment to Mercury’s ultra-long-
term view of kaitiakitanga (guardianship)
through the Trust’s objective of restoring
native forests so that New Zealanders
can enjoy them forever.
The Trust was born in 1980 out of direct
action taken by people protesting the
felling of giant totara in Pureora Forest.
Since that time, the Trust has continued
to protect New Zealand forests and has
rallied, purchased and protected well
over 7,000 hectares for the ongoing
benefit of all New Zealanders.
Sandy Crichton, Trust Manager, is clear
about the wider impact of the Trust.
“Protecting and restoring nature is an
important part of our climate change
response here in New Zealand.”
Through partnering with the Trust,
Mercury is supporting the Trust’s
stewardship of regenerating New
Zealand forest, and contributing to a
positive impact on climate change.
Sandy explains “From small beginnings,
founded on genuine passion to protect
and restore New Zealand’s native forest,
the Trust has gone on to become one of
the leading organisations involved in
native forest restoration. The Trust is still
relatively small, but we put the rallying
call out and huge numbers of passionate
people who really care a lot come
together. Our recent fundraising in
Northland and Taranaki is testament to
this, along with everyone who gives their
time on a volunteer basis.”
The Trust uses the extra income from
its contract with Mercury for reserve
management, including pest predator
control, weed control, track cutting,
signage and planting.
“Our relationship with Mercury is one of
our oldest and most important business
relationships,” says Sandy. “This was our
first contracted relationship around carbon
so it really paved the way in terms of other
relationships that we’ve since put in place.”
It was forward thinking at the time, it
is important now, and its value will be
experienced by all New Zealanders into
the future.
“The Trust recognises the efforts of
companies who have measured their
carbon footprint and then taken action
to try and reduce emissions, as well as
supporting native forest restoration to
reduce the impact of unavoidable
emissions,” says Sandy.
“The Trust’s work is only possible through
our incredible supporters and more
recently through ongoing carbon income
from organisations such as Mercury.”
GROWING SOLUTIONS
TO CLIMATE CHANGE
FIND OUT MORE ABOUT
THE NATIVE FOREST
RESTORATION TRUST
Please visit nfrt.org.nz
KAITIAKITANGA
38 // 39
FINANCIAL
COMMENTARY
OUR TEAM AND
STAKEHOLDERS
CHAIR AND
CHIEF EXECUTIVE
UPDATES
OUR
SUSTAINABILITY
STATEMENT
PILLARSCUSTOMER
PEOPLE
COMMERCIAL
PARTNERSHIPS
KAITIAKITANGA
BUSINESS
FUNDAMENTALS
A GLOBAL ISSUE
The impacts of climate
change are a significant
global challenge that is
arguably starting to play
out locally in many parts
of New Zealand.
The Kyoto Protocol is an
international treaty aimed at
reducing greenhouse gas
emissions, whereby countries
can reduce emissions and/or
purchase carbon credits to cover
any excess emissions. In 2020
New Zealand’s obligations under
Kyoto are replaced for the
following decade by Paris
Accord targets.
The New Zealand Emissions
Trading Scheme (ETS)
was launched in 2008,
and Mercury and other
electricity generators were
entered into the Scheme in
2010. The ETS puts a price
on emissions to provide an
incentive to reduce
emissions.
Mercury has contracts
with foresters that
enable us to buy
carbon units at a given
price in order to offset
our carbon liability
under the ETS.
FIND OUT MORE ABOUT OUR COMMITMENT
TO RENEWABLE GENERATION.
Please visit mercury.co.nz/renewables
40 // 41
FINANCIAL
COMMENTARY
OUR TEAM AND
STAKEHOLDERS
CHAIR AND
CHIEF EXECUTIVE
UPDATES
OUR
SUSTAINABILITY
STATEMENT
PILLARSCUSTOMER
PEOPLE
COMMERCIAL
PARTNERSHIPS
KAITIAKITANGA
BUSINESS
FUNDAMENTALS
MANAGING CLIMATE CHANGE RISKS
Mercury is aware climate change has the potential to create physical risks, as well as regulatory and financial,
for our operations well into the future. These could include more intense rainfall events in the Waikato catchment
and increasing average temperatures where we generate electricity.
We have undertaken preliminary modelling of various future climate change scenarios to 2050 and beyond.
Initial findings indicate increasing rainfall will provide the opportunity for increased generation. However, if the
intensity of rainfall events increases then more water may need to be spilled rather than used for generation.
Geothermal generation could also be reduced as increasing average temperatures will reduce the efficiency of
our cooling towers and the generation process. We will continue to monitor and manage climate change risks
and invest in a wide range of the most appropriate solutions.
CARBON IN OUR BUSINESS
Mercury carefully measures and manages its greenhouse gas emissions and has maintained a robust forestry
investment programme for the past eight years. An outcome of the programme is that Mercury has become
‘carbon positive’ in the past three years, where the forestry we invest in absorbs more carbon than Mercury
contributes to the environment.
Moving away from
thermal generation has
seen our total emissions
from generation
decrease by 47% over
the past three years.
The emissions intensity
of the electricity we put
into the NZ grid has
decreased by 55% over
the same period.
• While geothermal generation is a renewable energy
source, it is not emissions free. During the generation
process, greenhouse gas is released from the
geothermal fluid extracted from our geothermal
reservoirs. We closely monitor and report on the
amount of greenhouse gas released from our
geothermal power stations as required by the
Emissions Trading Scheme.
• Mercury takes responsibility for the carbon produced
by all the energy we provide, including the gas
consumed by our dual-fuel customers. We calculate
the carbon emissions associated with this fuel each
year and offset that along with what we directly emit.
• Mercury is actively reducing carbon emissions
from our business. We mothballed our thermal
(gas-fired) power station in 2015. This reduced our
carbon emissions, and associated financial liabilities,
by 47% over the past three years.
• We believe that electric transport offers the best
solution for cutting national greenhouse gas
emissions, as well as curbing transport related air
and noise pollution. We have already replaced every
possible vehicle in our fleet (91 out of 129) with
Electric Vehicles (EVs) and plug-in hybrid EVs (PHEVs).
Total reported carbon emissions include proportionate emissions
from our Tuaropaki Trust and Nga Awa Purua partnerships.
0
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
700,000
5,800
6,000
6,200
6,400
6,600
6,800
7,000
7, 200
7,400
7,600
7,800
GWhEmissions
CARBON EMISSIONS (TONNES C0
2
e)
FY15
FY16FY17FY18
GENERATION (GWh)
FINANCIAL
COMMENTARY
OUR TEAM AND
STAKEHOLDERS
CHAIR AND
CHIEF EXECUTIVE
UPDATES
OUR
SUSTAINABILITY
STATEMENT
PILLARSCUSTOMER
PEOPLE
COMMERCIAL
PARTNERSHIPS
KAITIAKITANGA
BUSINESS
FUNDAMENTALS
$734M
ENERGY MARGIN
(UP $36 MILLION
FROM FY2017)
Mercury’s financial performance for the
12 months to 30 June 2018 set another
record, with EBITDAF of $561 million,
an increase of $38 million on the
previous financial year. This record result
was underpinned by the highest North
Island hydro inflows and total generation
in the company’s history, the disciplined
management of costs and strong
execution of work programmes across
the business.
In May FY2018, Mercury completed a
$50 million share buyback (15.6 million
shares) at an average price of $3.21 per
share, bringing total shares held as
treasury stock to 39.1 million (2.7 %).
Mercury also completed the purchase
of a 19.99% stake in NZX and ASX listed
generator, Tilt Renewables Limited, for
$144 million or $2.30 per share. Post
year end, Mercury announced with
Infratil a joint takeover offer for all
the shares in Tilt. If the takeover is
successful, Mercury’s equity interest
in Tilt will remain at 19.99%.
Energy margin
Our energy margin of $734 million was
$36 million higher than the prior year.
Wet weather in the North Island, resulted
in record hydro generation of 4,947GWh
an increase of 223GWh, or 4.7%, on
FY2017. Record generation production
also coincided and benefited from
higher average wholesale prices (FY2018:
$82/MWh versus FY2017: $55/MWh at
Whakamaru) due to drier than normal
South Island hydrology and peakier
demand for electricity.
Despite increasing competition, the
Mercury brand continues to experience
below market average customer churn,
reflecting our focus on growing customer
promises. Growing our customer-led
digital offerings and capability and
upgrading key customer systems to a
fully-supported cloud-based
environment also contributed to this
year’s strong result.
Other income
Other income increased by $7 million to
$47 million, once the impacts of carbon
sales from the prior year are considered,.
This includes a $3 million increase in
revenue generated by our metering
business Metrix, land sales, proceeds
from insurance and dividends received
from our investment in Tilt.
Operating costs
Operating costs remained flat for the
fifth year in a row at $214 million due to
our ongoing focus on managing costs
and improved procurement practices.
This included major planned outages at
most of our geothermal sites, including a
22-day shut at our Kawerau station to
change out the steam turbine rotor and
refurbish the cooling towers (the biggest
shut in the plant’s history). Operating
costs represent the company’s indirect
costs of sales, including salaries and
wages, maintenance costs, and all other
corporate overheads.
FINANCIAL COMMENTARY.
$M
FINANCIAL YEAR
2014
2015201620172018
800
600
400
200
700
500
300
100
0
> FIGURE 1: ENERGY MARGIN
42 // 43
Operating earnings (EBITDAF)
As previously noted, EBITDAF for the year
was $561 million up $61 million on initial
guidance for the year and up $38 million
on FY2017, primarily due to the higher
hydro generation output and a focus on
capturing the value from higher and
more volatile wholesale electricity prices.
We have continued to execute well in our
core business by focusing on growing
customer loyalty, managing costs and
maintaining our strong regional
partnerships – all of which are reflected
in this record financial performance.
Profit for the year
Profit for the year was $234 million
up $50 million versus FY2017. Profit
increased due to higher operating
earnings, favourable fair value
movements in financial instruments
due largely to higher valuations of
non-hedge accounted electricity
derivative contracts, a roll down of the
group’s historic out of the money interest
rate swaps, and lower interest expense,
partially offset by higher depreciation
charges, mostly due to current year asset
additions and geothermal generation
asset revaluations in the prior year,
coupled with higher tax expense
because of higher operating earnings.
There were no impairments recognised
in FY2018.
2014
2015201620172018
FINANCIAL YEAR
$M
250
200
150
100
50
0
> FIGURE 2: OPERATING COSTS
2014
2015201620172018
FINANCIAL YEAR
$M
600
500
300
100
400
200
0
> FIGURE 3: OPERATING EARNINGS (EBITDAF)
$
561M
$
234M
PROFIT FOR
THE YEAR
(UP $50 MILLION)
RESULT
OPERATING EARNINGS
(EBITDAF)
Capital structure and dividends
As noted, Mercury completed an
on-market share buyback programme
acquiring nearly 15.6 million ordinary
Mercury shares (1.1%) for total
consideration of NZ$50 million.
Consistent with the 2014 buyback, the
shares are being held as treasury stock
providing future balance sheet flexibility.
The share buyback and Tilt investment
lifted the company’s gearing level to 2.0
at the top (good) end of Mercury’s target
range of 2.0x to 3.0x debt/EBITDAF ratio
for our S&P credit rating of BBB+, which
was reaffirmed in December 2017.
In line with Mercury’s dividend policy,
targeting a pay-out ratio of 70% to 85%
of Free Cash Flow on average over time,
a fully imputed 9.1 cents per share final
dividend has been declared. This brings
the full-year ordinary dividend to
15.1 cents per share, up from 14.6 cents
per share in FY2017, and marks our
10th consecutive year of ordinary
dividend growth. The final dividend will
be paid on the 28th September 2018.
Underlying earnings after tax
Underlying earnings is presented to enable
stakeholders to make an assessment
and comparison of earnings after
removing one-off and/or infrequently
occurring events (exceeding $10 million
of profit before tax), impairments and
any changes in the fair value of derivative
financial instruments. Underlying Earnings
after tax increased by $22 million to
$198 million reflecting the company’s
stronger EBITDAF performance partially
offset by higher depreciation costs on
the previous year.
Net cash flows from operating
activities
Net cash provided by operating
activities represents the cash flows from
the sale of electricity and metering
services, along with the costs associated
with their sale and the cash costs of
interest and taxes. This decreased by
$1 million in FY2018 to $371 million.
Significantly higher cash taxes in FY2018
of $102 million versus $52 million in
FY2017 were due to tax prepayments
made in FY2016 and FY2018 for
dividend imputation reasons.
15.1 CENTS
FULL YEAR ORDINARY DIVIDEND
9.1 CENTS
FINAL DIVIDEND
BBB+
OUR S&P CREDIT
RATING
$198M
UNDERLYING EARNINGS AFTER TAX
> FIGURE 4: CAPITAL EXPENDITURE
NEW INVESTMENT
STAY-IN-BUSINESS
$M
FINANCIAL YEAR
2014
2015201620172018
120
80
40
100
60
20
0
> FIGURE 5: DIVIDENDS
SPECIAL
FINAL
INTERIM
CENTS/SHARE
FINANCIAL YEAR
2014
2015201620172018
25
15
5
20
10
0
44 // 45
FINANCIAL
COMMENTARY
OUR TEAM AND
STAKEHOLDERS
CHAIR AND
CHIEF EXECUTIVE
UPDATES
OUR
SUSTAINABILITY
STATEMENT
PILLARSCUSTOMER
PEOPLE
COMMERCIAL
PARTNERSHIPS
KAITIAKITANGA
BUSINESS
FUNDAMENTALS
Balance Sheet
Total assets of the company increased by
$94 million in the financial year largely
due to the investment in Tilt. Net debt at
the end of the year rose to $1,249 million
compared to $1,038 million in FY2017.
The company invested $118 million
in capital expenditure (CAPEX),
comprising SIB CAPEX of $112 million
and $6 million of growth capex spent
mostly on new smart meter deployment.
The company invested $112 million of
SIB CAPEX in major hydro refurbishment
projects at our Aratiatia and Whakamaru
hydro stations. The second refurbished
generator and turbine at Whakamaru
lifted its capacity by 23% to 31MW. At
Ngatamariki the drilling of a replacement
well ensured the facility has continued
access to “fuel” to maintain its full
generation capacity.
Mercury continues to invest in its
technology systems and completed
projects across the business including a
new system to deliver certified half-
hourly data to Metrix’s customers,
improvements to our core SAP customer
and financial system, implementation of
SAP Hybris Service Cloud a new
cloud-based customer relationship
management system , the movement to
cloud-based data centres and the
upgrade of the generation asset
management system Maximo.
> FIGURE 6: UNDERLYING EARNINGS AFTER TAX
$M
FINANCIAL YEAR
2014
2015201620172018
200
100
150
50
0
$112M
STAY-IN-BUSINESS CAPEX
YOUR DIRECTORS.
> JOAN WITHERS
CHAIR
> JAMES MILLER
DIRECTOR
> MIKE TAITOKO
DIRECTOR
> KEITH SMITH
DIRECTOR
> ANNA LISSAMAN
FUTURE DIRECTOR
> SCOTT ST JOHN
DIRECTOR
> PRUE FLACKS
DIRECTOR
> PATRICK STRANGE
DIRECTOR
> ANDY LARK
DIRECTOR
46 // 47
FINANCIAL
COMMENTARY
OUR TEAM AND
STAKEHOLDERS
CHAIR AND
CHIEF EXECUTIVE
UPDATES
OUR
SUSTAINABILITY
STATEMENT
PILLARSCUSTOMER
PEOPLE
COMMERCIAL
PARTNERSHIPS
KAITIAKITANGA
BUSINESS
FUNDAMENTALS
OUR EXECUTIVE TEAM.
> FRASER WHINERAY
CHIEF EXECUTIVE
> MATTHEW OLDE
METRIX CHIEF EXECUTIVE
> TONY NAGEL
GENERAL MANAGER CORPORATE AFFAIRS
>
MARLENE STRAWSON
GENERAL MANAGER PEOPLE & PERFORMANCE
> NICK CLARKE
GENERAL MANAGER GEOTHERMAL & SAFETY
> PHIL GIBSON
GENERAL MANAGER HYDRO & WHOLESALE
>
KEVIN ANGLAND
GENERAL MANAGER DIGITAL SERVICES
> WILLIAM MEEK
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
> JULIA JACK
CHIEF MARKETING OFFICER
PLEASE SEE OUR WEBSITE
FOR FULL BIOGRAPHIES
mercury.co.nz/leadership
SEE OUR GREAT ELECTRIC
VEHICLES AND FUEL PACKAGES AT
mercury.co.nz/evs
OUR 2018 FINANCIAL REPORT
$561M
EBITDAF UP $38M, REFLECTING ANOTHER
YEAR OF RECORD GENERATION FROM STRONG
HYDRO INFLOWS.
$234M
NET PROFIT AFTER TAX $50M HIGHER,
ACHIEVED THROUGH STRONG EXECUTION
ACROSS THE BUSINESS.
$259M
FREE CASH FLOW FLAT YEAR ON YEAR
FROM HIGHER CASH RECEIPTS OFFSET
BY PREPAYMENT OF TAX.
15.1CPS
ORDINARY DIVIDEND UP 3.4%.
01 REPORT CARD
02 FINANCIAL TRACK RECORD
03 INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT
06 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
33 GOVERNANCE AT MERCURY
40 REMUNERATION REPORT
46 DISCLOSURES
54 GLOSSARY
55 DIRECTORY
Mercury NZ Limited
ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2018
The Directors are pleased to present Mercury NZ Limited’s
annual report and fi nancial statements for the year ended
30 June 2018.
The Auditor-General is required to be the company’s
auditor, and has appointed Simon O’Connor of Ernst &
Young to undertake the audit on his behalf.
The Directors are not aware of any circumstances since the
end of the year that have signifi cantly or may signifi cantly
affect the operations of the Group.
This annual report is dated 21 August 2018 and is signed
on behalf of the Board by:
Joan Withers, Chair
Keith Smith, Director
STATEMENT FROM THE DIRECTORS
REPORT CARD.
> FINANCIALS
$561M
EBITDAF UP $38M, REFLECTING ANOTHER
YEAR OF RECORD GENERATION FROM STRONG
HYDRO INFLOWS.
$234M
NET PROFIT AFTER TAX $50M HIGHER,
ACHIEVED THROUGH STRONG EXECUTION
ACROSS THE BUSINESS.
$259M
FREE CASH FLOW FLAT YEAR ON YEAR
FROM HIGHER CASH RECEIPTS OFFSET
BY PREPAYMENT OF TAX.
15.1CPS
ORDINARY DIVIDEND UP 3.4%.
01 REPORT CARD
02 FINANCIAL TRACK RECORD
03 INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT
06 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
33 GOVERNANCE AT MERCURY
40 REMUNERATION REPORT
46 DISCLOSURES
54 GLOSSARY
55 DIRECTORY
Mercury NZ Limited
ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2018
The Directors are pleased to present Mercury NZ Limited’s
annual report and fi nancial statements for the year ended
30 June 2018.
The Auditor-General is required to be the company’s
auditor, and has appointed Simon O’Connor of Ernst &
Young to undertake the audit on his behalf.
The Directors are not aware of any circumstances since the
end of the year that have signifi cantly or may signifi cantly
affect the operations of the Group.
This annual report is dated 21 August 2018 and is signed
on behalf of the Board by:
Joan Withers, Chair
Keith Smith, Director
STATEMENT FROM THE DIRECTORS
REPORT CARD.
> FINANCIALS
ZERO
HIGH SEVERITY INCIDENTS.
63%
OF MERCURY CUSTOMERS RATING
AS ‘HIGHLY SATISFIED’.
$214M
OPERATING EXPENDITURE FLAT FOR THE
FIFTH STRAIGHT YEAR.
6.4%
MERCURY BRAND TRADER SWITCH CHURN,
LOWER THAN MARKET AVERAGE.
> LEVERAGING CORE STRENGTHS
> DELIVERING SUSTAINABLE GROWTH
> DELIVERING CUSTOMER ADVOCACY
19.99%
STAKE IN TILT RENEWABLES, CREATING PLATFORM FOR
EXPOSURE TO AUSTRALIA’S TRANSITION TO RENEWABLE
ELECTRICITY GENERATION.
7, 7 0 4GWh
RECORD GENERATION FROM FAVOURABLE HYDROLOGICAL
CONDITIONS AND STRONG EXECUTION OF KEY PROJECTS.
02 // 03
Financial Performance Trends
For the year ended 30 June ($ million)20182017201620152014
Income statement
Energy margin734698660650690
EBITDAF561523493482504
Net profit for the year23418416047212
Balance sheet
Total shareholders’ equity3,2863,3083,3153,3373,219
Total assets 6,0915,9976,0856,0585,689
Total liabilities2,8052,6892,7702,7212,470
Cash flow
Operating cash flow371372280309317
Investing cash flow(260)(90)(37)(103)(99)
Financing cash flow(136)(298)(228)(195)(213)
Capital expenditure
Total capital expenditure1181167211093
Growth capital expenditure62133133
Stay-in-business capital expenditure112114597960
Other financial measures
Underlying earnings after tax198176152145185
Free cash flow259258221230257
Ordinary and special declared dividends207270252296186
Ordinary dividends per share (cents)15.114.614.314.013.5
Special dividends per share (cents)–5.04.07. 5–
Basic and diluted earnings per share (cents)17.0213.3711.63.415.3
Net debt1,2491,0381,0681,0821,031
Gearing (net debt/net debt+equity, %)2 7. 523.924.424.524.3
Debt/EBITDAF (x)
1
2.01.82.02.02.1
Operational measures
Total recordable injury frequency rate (TRIFR)
2
0.871.050.741.250.84
Sales to customers (FPVV, GWh)4,4774,6064,3974,4864,844
Electricity customers (‘000)388392376382382
Electricity generation (GWh)7,7 0 47,5336,8426,5636,295
1 Adjusted for S&P treatment of subordinated debt issued in FY2015.
2 Per 200,000 hours; includes onsite employees and contractors.
FINANCIAL TRACK RECORD
TO THE SHAREHOLDERS OF MERCURY NZ LIMITED
REPORT ON THE AUDIT OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2018
The Auditor-General is the auditor of Mercury NZ Limited (‘the entity’) and its subsidiaries and other controlled entities (collectively
referred to as ‘the Group’). The Auditor-General has appointed me, Simon O’Connor, using the staff and resources of Ernst & Young,
to carry out the audit of the consolidated financial statements of the Group on his behalf.
Opinion
We have audited the financial statements of the Group on pages 6 to 32 of the Financial Report, that comprise the consolidated
balance sheet as at 30 June 2018, the consolidated income statement, consolidated statement of comprehensive income,
consolidated statement of changes in equity and consolidated cash flow statement for the year then ended on that date, and notes
to the consolidated financial statements that include accounting policies and other explanatory information.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements of the Group present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial
position of the Group as at 30 June 2018, and its consolidated financial performance and cash flows for the year then ended in
accordance with New Zealand Equivalents to International Financial Reporting Standards and International Financial Reporting
Standards.
The basis of our opinion is explained below. In addition, we outline the responsibilities of the Board of Directors and our responsibilities,
and explain our independence.
Basis for Opinion
We carried out our audit in accordance with the Auditor-General’s Auditing Standards, which incorporate the Professional and Ethical
Standards and the International Standards on Auditing (New Zealand) issued by the New Zealand Auditing and Assurance Standards
Board. Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the
Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial
Statements
section of our report.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.
We are independent of the Group in accordance with the Auditor-General’s Auditing Standards, which incorporate Professional and
Ethical Standard 1 (Revised)
Code of Ethics for Assurance Practitioners issued by the New Zealand Auditing and Assurance Standards
Board, and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements.
In addition to the audit we have carried out assignments including a review of the Group’s consolidated financial statements for the
six months ended 31 December 2017, payroll advisory services, along with tax compliance services in the United States, which are
compatible with those independence requirements. These services have not impaired our independence as auditor of the Group.
Partners and employees of our firm may deal with the Group on normal terms within the ordinary course of trading activities of the
business of the Group. Other than the audit and these assignments and trading activities, we have no relationship with, or interests in,
the Group.
Key Audit Matters
Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgement, were of most significance in our audit of the consolidated
financial statements of the current period. These matters were addressed in the context of our audit of the consolidated financial
statements as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, and we do not provide a separate opinion on these matters.
We have fulfilled the responsibilities described in the
Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements section of the
audit report, including in relation to these matters. Accordingly, our audit included the performance of procedures designed to respond
to our assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements. The results of our audit procedures, including the
procedures performed to address the matters below, provide the basis for our audit opinion on the accompanying consolidated
financial statements.
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT
04 // 05
How our audit addressed key audit matters
Key audit matterHow we addressed the key audit matter
Valuation of Generation Assets
Generation assets were revalued at 30 June 2018 as set out in
note 8 of the consolidated financial statements to $5,215 million.
The Group engages an independent external party to estimate
the fair value of generation assets using a discounted cash flow
model. The significant inputs used to calculate the fair value of
the generation assets include the wholesale electricity price path,
generation volumes, and the discount rate. The wholesale
electricity price path is estimated by the Group’s valuation
specialist as described in note 8 of the consolidated financial
statements and also considers Mercury NZ Limited’s own internal
five year forecast electricity price path. The model used to
estimate the wholesale electricity price path is complex and
includes a number of significant assumptions. The estimate of
the wholesale electricity price path is the most significant input in
estimating the fair values determined for the generation assets.
Our audit procedures included assessing the key inputs to
the model used to estimate the fair value of the generation
assets. Our procedures, which included the use of our valuation
specialists, were primarily focused on evaluating the process
undertaken by the Group’s valuation specialist and the Group
in forecasting the wholesale electricity price path and assessing
whether the forecast was consistent with internal and external data.
We assessed the professional competence, independence and
objectivity of the Group’s valuation specialist in the modelling of
the electricity price path and valuation of the generation assets.
We also compared budgeted performance information from
prior periods to historical data to assess the accuracy of the
forecasting process.
We further assessed the adequacy of the related financial
statement disclosures as described in note 8.
Valuation of Electricity Derivative, Currency and Interest Rate Derivative Financial Instruments
The Group’s activities expose it to electricity market price,
currency and interest rate risk which are managed using
derivative financial instruments. At 30 June 2018 derivative
assets total $141 million and derivative liabilities were $97 million
as set out in note 15 of the consolidated financial statements.
The valuations of the interest rate derivatives, foreign exchange
derivatives, and certain electricity price derivatives which are
prepared by The Group are based primarily on observable inputs
and are measured using standard valuation techniques. Certain
other electricity price derivatives are valued using inputs for
which inputs are not readily available in active primary or
secondary markets and require more complex valuation models
involving the wholesale electricity price path forecast by the
Group. The wholesale electricity price path forecast requires
significant judgement.
Our audit procedures included agreeing underlying data to the
contract terms on a sample basis, evaluating the
appropriateness of the valuation methodologies, assessing key
assumptions and inputs and recalculating the fair value of a
sample of electricity derivatives. We also performed procedures
on the wholesale electricity price path as explained above under
the section entitled ‘Valuation of Generation Assets’.
We further assessed the adequacy of the related financial
statement disclosures as described in note 15.
Information other than in the Financial Statements and Auditor’s report
The Board of Directors are responsible on behalf of the entity for the Annual Report and the Financial Report, which includes
information other than the consolidated financial statements and auditor’s report.
Our opinion on the consolidated financial statements does not cover the other information and we do not express any form of
assurance conclusion thereon.
In connection with our audit of the consolidated financial statements, our responsibility is to read the other information and, in doing
so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the consolidated financial statements or our knowledge
obtained in the audit or otherwise appears to be materially misstated. If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude that there
is a material misstatement of this other information, we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report in this regard.
Directors’ Responsibilities for the Financial Statements
The directors are responsible on behalf of the entity for the preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements
for the Group that comply with, New Zealand Equivalents to International Financial Reporting Standards and International Financial
Reporting Standards.
The directors responsibilities arise from the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013.
The directors are also responsible for such internal control as it determines is necessary to enable the preparation of financial
statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error and for the publication of the financial statements,
whether in printed or electronic form.
In preparing the consolidated financial statements, the directors are responsible, on behalf of the entity, for assessing the Group’s ability
to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of
accounting unless the Directors either intend to liquidate the Group or to cease operations, or have no realistic alternative but to do so.
Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material
misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report that includes our opinion.
Our responsibilities arise from the Public Audit Act 2001. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee
that an audit conducted in accordance with the Auditor-General’s Auditing Standards will always detect a material misstatement when
it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could
reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these financial statements.
As part of an audit in accordance with the Auditor-General’s Auditing Standards, we exercise professional judgement and maintain
professional scepticism throughout the audit. We also:
• Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to fraud or error,
design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks, and obtain audit evidence that is sufficient and appropriate to
provide a basis for our opinion. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one
resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal
control.
• Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Group’s internal control.
• Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates and related disclosures
made by management.
• Conclude on the appropriateness of the use of the going concern basis of accounting by the directors and, based on the audit
evidence obtained, whether a material uncertainty exists related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the
Group’s ability to continue as a going concern. If we conclude that a material uncertainty exists, we are required to draw attention
in our auditor’s report to the related disclosures in the financial statements or, if such disclosures are inadequate, to modify our
opinion. Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of our auditor’s report. However, future events or
conditions may cause the Group to cease to continue as a going concern.
• Evaluate the overall presentation, structure and content of the consolidated financial statements, including the disclosures, and
whether the consolidated financial statements represent the underlying transactions and events in a manner that achieves fair
presentation.
• Obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding the financial information of the entities or business activities within the
Group to express an opinion on the consolidated financial statements. We are responsible for the direction, supervision and
performance of the group audit. We remain solely responsible for our audit opinion.
• We did not examine every transaction, nor do we guarantee complete accuracy of the financial statements. Also, we did not
evaluate the security and controls over the electronic publication of the financial statements.
We communicate with the directors regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit and significant audit
findings, including any significant deficiencies in internal control that we identify during our audit.
We also provide the directors with a statement that we have complied with relevant ethical requirements regarding independence, and
to communicate with them all relationships and other matters that may reasonably be thought to bear on our independence, and
where applicable, related safeguards.
From the matters communicated with the directors, we determine those matters that were of most significance in the audit of the
financial statements of the current period and are therefore the key audit matters. We describe these matters in our auditor’s report
unless law or regulation precludes public disclosure about the matter or when, in extremely rare circumstances, we determine that a
matter should not be communicated in our report because the adverse consequences of doing so would reasonably be expected to
outweigh the public interest benefits of such communication.
> SIMON O’CONNOR
ERNST & YOUNG
ON BEHALF OF THE AUDITOR-GENERAL
AUCKLAND, NEW ZEALAND
21 AUGUST 2018
06 // 07
CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENT
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2018
Note
2018
$M
2017
$M
Total revenue41,803 1,597
Total expenses4(1,242)(1,074)
EBITDAF
1
561 523
Depreciation and amortisation8, 9(197)(189)
Change in the fair value of financial instruments1549 31
Impairments– (18)
Earnings of associates and joint ventures102 6
Net interest expense4(90)(95)
Profit before tax325258
Tax expense6(91)(74)
Profit for the year attributable to owners of the parent234184
Basic and diluted earnings per share (cents) 17.02 13.37
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2018
2018
$M
2017
$M
Profit for the year234184
Other comprehensive income
Items that will not be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss
Movement in asset revaluation reserve5555
Movement in cash flow hedge reserve transferred to balance sheet155–
Share of movements in associates’ and joint ventures’ reserves10 14 (14)
Tax effect (17) (15)
Items that may be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss
Movement in cash flow hedge reserve15 3336
Movement in other reserves (64)11
Tax effect (9)(11)
Other comprehensive income for the year, net of taxation17 62
Total comprehensive income for the year attributable to owners of the parent251246
1 EBITDAF: Earnings before net interest expense, income tax, depreciation and amortisation, change in the fair value of financial instruments, impairments and equity
accounted earnings of associates and joint ventures
The accompanying notes form an integral part of these financial statements.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
AS AT 30 JUNE 2018
Note
2018
$M
2017
$M
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Issued capital 378 378
Treasury shares5 (101) (51)
Reserves 3,009 2,981
Total shareholders’ equity 3,2863,308
ASSETS
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents 5 30
Receivables11 226 240
Inventories7 35 39
Derivative financial instruments15 31 18
Total current assets 297 327
Non-current assets
Property, plant and equipment8 5,358 5,388
Intangible assets9 101 87
Investments 10 130 –
Investment and advances to associates10 88 76
Advances to joint operations10 7 8
Derivative financial instruments15 110 111
Total non-current assets 5,794 5,670
Total assets 6,091 5,997
LIABILITIES
Current liabilities
Payables and accruals11 198 202
Provisions12 – 1
Borrowings13 345 83
Derivative financial instruments15 24 49
Taxation payable6 17 23
Total current liabilities584 358
Non-current liabilities
Payables and accruals11 6 4
Provisions12 51 53
Derivative financial instruments15 73 139
Borrowings13960 1,024
Deferred tax6 1,131 1,111
Total non-current liabilities 2,221 2,331
Total liabilities 2,805 2,689
Net assets 3,286 3,308
For and on behalf of the Board of Directors who authorised the issue of the Financial Statements on 21 August 2018.
Joan Withers Keith Smith
Chair Director
21 August 2018 21 August 2018
The accompanying notes form an integral part of these financial statements.
08 // 09
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2018
Issued
capital
$M
Retained
earnings
$M
Asset
revaluation
reserve
$M
Cash flow
hedge
reserve
$M
Other
reserves
$M
Total
equity
$M
Balance as at 1 July 2016378 253 2,821 (76)(61) 3,315
Movement in asset revaluation reserve, net of taxation – – 38 – – 38
Movement in cash flow hedge reserve, net of taxation – – – 25 – 25
Movements in other reserves – – – – 11 11
Share of movements in associates’ and joint ventures’
reserves – – (12) (2) – (14)
Release of asset revaluation reserve, net of taxation – – 2 – – 2
Other comprehensive income – – 28 23 11 62
Net profit for the year – 184 – – – 184
Total comprehensive income for the year – 184 28 23 11 246
Dividend – (253) – – – (253)
Balance as at 30 June 2017378 184 2,849 (53)(50)3,308
Balance as at 1 July 2017 378 184 2,849 (53) (50) 3,308
Movement in asset revaluation reserve, net of taxation – – 40 – – 40
Movement in cash flow hedge reserve, net of taxation – – – 27 – 27
Movements in other reserves – – – – (14) (14)
Share of movements in associates’ and joint ventures’
reserves – – 12 2 – 14
Acquisition of treasury shares––––(50)(50)
Other comprehensive income – – 52 29 (64) 17
Net profit for the year – 234 – – – 234
Total comprehensive income for the year – 234 52 29 (64)251
Dividend – (273) – – – (273)
Balance as at 30 June 2018378 145 2,901 (24)(114)3,286
The accompanying notes form an integral part of these financial statements.
CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOW STATEMENT
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2018
2018
$M
2017
$M
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Receipts from customers 1,800 1,539
Payments to suppliers and employees (1,237)(1,022)
Interest received 2 2
Interest paid (92)(95)
Taxes paid (102)(52)
Net cash provided by operating activities 371 372
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Acquisition of property, plant and equipment (94)(103)
Acquisition of intangibles (33)(20)
Acquisition of investment (144)–
Disposal of intangibles – 26
Disposal of land and associated real property 5 –
Distributions received from and advances repaid to associates and joint ventures 6 7
Net cash used in investing activities (260)(90)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Acquisition of treasury shares (50) –
Proceeds from loans 262 75
Repayment of loans (75) (120)
Dividends paid (273)(253)
Net cash used in financing activities (136)(298)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents held (25)(16)
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year 30 46
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year 5 30
Cash balance comprises:
Cash balance at the end of the year 5 30
The accompanying notes form an integral part of these financial statements.
10 // 11
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2018
NOTE 1. ACCOUNTING POLICIES
(1) Reporting entity
Mercury NZ Limited (“the Company”) is incorporated in New Zealand, registered under the Companies Act 1993, an FMC
reporting entity under the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013, and is listed on the NZSX and ASX.
The consolidated financial statements (“Group financial statements”) are for Mercury NZ Limited Group (“the Group”). The
Group financial statements comprise the Company and its subsidiaries, including its investments in associates and interests in
joint arrangements.
The majority shareholder of Mercury NZ Limited is Her Majesty the Queen in Right of New Zealand (“the Government”),
providing it with significant potential influence over the Group. The liabilities of the Group are not guaranteed in any way by the
Government or by any other shareholder.
(2) Basis of preparation
The Group financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the Financial Reporting Act 2013, the Companies Act
1993 and in accordance with New Zealand Generally Accepted Accounting Practice (“NZ GAAP”). They comply with New
Zealand equivalents to International Financial Reporting Standards (“NZ IFRS”) as appropriate for profit-oriented entities.
These financial statements also comply with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”).
The Group financial statements are prepared on the basis of historical cost, with the exception of financial instruments and
generation assets which are measured at fair value.
The Group financial statements have been prepared so that all components are stated exclusive of GST, with the exception of
receivables and payables that include GST invoiced.
Functional and presentation currency
These financial statements are presented in New Zealand Dollars ($) which is the Group’s functional currency, apart from
Mighty Geothermal Power Limited and its direct subsidiaries as their functional currency is the United States Dollar. Unless
otherwise stated, financial information has been rounded to the nearest million dollars ($M).
The assets and liabilities of entities whose functional currency is not the New Zealand Dollar, are translated at the exchange
rates ruling at balance date. Revenue and expense items are translated at the spot rate at the transaction date or a rate
approximating that rate. Exchange differences are taken to the foreign currency translation reserve.
Estimates and judgements
The preparation of financial statements requires judgements and estimates that impact the application of policies and the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities, income and expenses. Actual results may differ from these estimates.
The areas of significant estimates and judgements are as follows:
Generation plant and equipment (refer note 8)
Retail revenue accruals (refer note 11)
Restoration and environmental rehabilitation (refer note 12)
Valuation of financial instruments (refer note 14 and note 15)
Accounting policies and standards
No changes to accounting policies have been made during the year and policies have been consistently applied to all years
presented. Certain comparatives have been restated where needed to conform to current year classification and presentation.
Implementation of new accounting standards
New international financial reporting standards relating to Financial Instruments (NZ IFRS 9), Revenue from Contracts with
Customers (NZ IFRS 15), and Leases (NZ IFRS 16) will be adopted by the Group for the reporting period ending 30 June 2019.
The Group has reviewed its existing and future contracts and arrangements, and undertaken an assessment of the impact of
the new standards.
NZ IFRS 9 Financial instruments
NZ IFRS 9 addresses the classification, measurement and recognition of financial assets and liabilities through a simplified
mixed measurement model and establishes three primary measurement categories for financial assets, being (i) amortised
cost (ii) fair value through other comprehensive income and (iii) fair value through profit or loss.
The basis of classification depends on the entity’s business model and the contractual cash flow characteristics of the
financial asset. The expected credit losses model replaces the incurred loss impairment model used in NZ IAS 39. NZ IFRS 9
also expands the eligibility for hedge accounting by focusing on the economic relationship between hedged items and
hedging instruments.
This treatment may result in the increased ability for Mercury to hedge account for financial arrangements. Adopting this
approach will result in greater fair value movements recognised through the cash flow hedge reserve as opposed to the
income statement. On adoption, there are no additional financial derivatives that will be hedge accounted under the new
standard.
NZ IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers
The core principle of NZ IFRS 15 is that an entity must recognise revenue at an amount that reflects the consideration it
expects to be entitled for transferring goods or services to a customer. This is achieved through the core principles of the
standard, including identification of performance obligations in a contract, and allocation of a contract’s transaction price to
each of those performance obligations as they are satisfied. NZ IFRS 15 also specifies the accounting treatment for costs
incurred to obtain and fulfil contracts with customers. Specific presentation and disclosure requirements are also provided,
which are more detailed than under current standards.
Generally, revenue received by Mercury will continue to be recognised over time, as consideration due equates to contract
performance completed to date. For expedience, Mercury will apply NZ IFRS 15 to portfolios of customer contracts (e.g.
end-user sales), as these contracts have similar characteristics, and the effects on financial statements do not differ materially
from applying current standards to individual contracts.
Certain items will require differential treatment from that which is applicable under current standards. The main items
impacted are:
• Customer credits in the form of discounts allocated to customers will be recognised against revenue. This is a departure
from current treatment of recognising through expenses.
• Incremental costs of acquiring contracts with customers (e.g. commissions) will be capitalised to the balance sheet and
amortised over a period of two years.
• Disclosure requirements will increase. Revenue items will be disaggregated, contract balances disclosed and contract
performance obligations described via the notes to the financial statements.
While the timing of revenue recognition is similar to current standards, the Group will generally recognise a greater amount of
contract costs within revenue as opposed to its current practice of recognising within expenses.
NZ IFRS 16 Leases
NZ IFRS 16 will bring most leases on-balance sheet with the aim of providing more transparency around the impact of leases
on the Group. The standard provides a single lease accounting model, requiring the recognition of assets and liabilities for all
leases unless the lease term is 12 months or less or the underlying asset has a low value.
The presentation of Mercury’s financial statements will be significantly impacted by NZ IFRS 16. Operating leases with a term
of greater than one year (as shown in note 18) will be recognised on the balance sheet as right-of-use assets and lease
liabilities. An additional interest expense relating to the lease liability will be recognised over the lease term, and the right-of-
use asset will be depreciated via the income statement.
At the date of adoption, the Group will have leases relating mainly to building accommodation, with terms of up to 17 years.
The approximate impact on the 30 June 2018 financial statements of the three new standards is an immaterial impact on net
profit before tax (being increase in EBITDAF of $5 million and an increase in depreciation and interest costs of $5 million),
an increase in assets of $15 million, an increase in liabilities of $20 million, with a corresponding decrease in reserves of
$5 million.
12 // 13
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2018
NOTE 2. SEGMENT REPORTING
Identification of reportable segments
The operating segments are identified by management based on the nature of the products and services provided. Discrete
financial information about each of these operating businesses is reported to the Chief Executive, being the chief operating
decision-maker, on at least a monthly basis, who assesses the performance of the operating segments on a measure of
EBITDAF. Segment EBITDAF represents profit earned by each segment exclusive of any allocation of central administration
costs, share of earnings of associates, change in fair value of financial instruments, depreciation, amortisation, impairments,
finance costs and tax expense. Operating segments are aggregated into reportable segments only if they share similar
economic characteristics.
Types of products and services
Energy Markets
The energy markets segment encompasses activity associated with the electricity production, electricity trading, and sale of
energy and related services and products to customers, and generation development activities.
Other Segments
Other operating segments that are not considered to be reporting segments are grouped together as “Other Segments”.
Activities include metering, sales of solar equipment, and international geothermal operations.
Unallocated
Represents corporate support services and related elimination adjustments.
Inter-segment
Transactions between segments are carried out on normal commercial terms and represent charges by Other Segments to
Energy Markets.
Segment results
June 2018
Energy
Markets
$M
Other
Segments
$M
Unallocated
$M
Inter–
segment
$M
To t a l
$M
Total segment revenue 1,773 53 2 (25) 1,803
Direct costs (1,047) (6) – 25 (1,028)
Other operating expenses (134) (18) (62) – (214)
Segment EBITDAF 592 29 (60) – 561
June 2017
Energy
Markets
$M
Other
Segments
$M
Unallocated
$M
Inter–
segment
$M
To t a l
$M
Total segment revenue1,571 52 1 (27)1,597
Direct costs(881)(6) – 27 (860)
Other operating expenses(133)(19)(62) – (214)
Segment EBITDAF557 27 (61) – 523
NOTE 3. NON STATUTORY MEASURE – UNDERLYING EARNINGS
Underlying earnings is presented to enable stakeholders to make an assessment and comparison of earnings after removing
one-off and/or infrequently occurring events (exceeding $10 million of net profit before tax), impairments and any changes in
the fair value of derivative financial instruments or any equity accounted share of changes in the fair value of derivative
financial instruments.
2018
$M
2017
$M
Profit for the year234184
Change in the fair value of financial instruments(49)(31)
Equity accounted share of the change in the fair value of financial instruments of associate entities (1) (4)
Impairments – 18
Adjustments before tax expense(50)(17)
Tax expense 14 9
Adjustments after tax expense(36)(8)
Underlying earnings after tax198176
Tax has been applied on all taxable adjustments at 28%.
NOTE 4. OTHER INCOME STATEMENT DISCLOSURES
2018
$M
2017
$M
Sales 1,756 1,552
Other revenue 47 45
Total revenue1,803 1,597
Energy costs (527)(358)
Line charges (437)(440)
Other direct cost of sales, excluding third party metering (33)(32)
Direct costs of other revenue (6)(6)
Third party metering (25)(24)
Employee compensation and benefits (87)(83)
Maintenance expenses (51)(48)
Other expenses (76)(83)
Total expenses (1,242)(1,074)
Interest expense (92) (97)
Interest income 2 2
Net interest expense (90)(95)
Audit fees
Fees payable to Ernst & Young, who are appointed by the Auditor General, for the audit and review of the financial statements
were $590,000 (2017: $580,000). Non audit services in relation to payroll advisory services were $71,000 (2017: $26,000).
EY (US) also provided US tax compliance services in the amount of $247,000 (2017: $198,000).
14 // 15
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2018
NOTE 5. SHARE CAPITAL AND DISTRIBUTION
The share capital of the Company is represented by 1,400,012,517 ordinary shares (2017: 1,400,012,517) issued and fully paid.
The weighted average number of shares on issue during the year, on both a basic and diluted basis, was 1,374,982,137 (2017:
1,376,302,303). These shares do not have a par value, have equal voting rights and share equally in dividends and any surplus
on winding up.
2018
Number of
shares (M)
2018
$M
2017
Number of
shares (M)
2017
$M
Treasury shares
Balance at the beginning of the year 24 51 24 52
Acquisition of treasury shares 15 50 – –
Balance at the end of the year 39 101 24 51
Cents
per share
2018
$M
2017
$M
Dividends declared and paid
Final dividend for 2016 8.6 – 118
Special dividend paid September 2016 4.0 – 55
Interim dividend for 2017 5.8 – 80
Final dividend for 2017 8.8 121 –
Special dividend paid September 2017 5.0 69 –
Interim dividend for 2018 6.0 83 –
273253
No imputation credits are available at 30 June 2018 (2017: $nil) as the imputation credit account has a deficit of $24 million.
The imputation credit account is required to have a surplus balance at 31 March each year.
NOTE 6. TAXATION
2018
$M
2017
$M
Income Tax
(i) Tax expense
Profit before tax 325258
Prima facie tax expense at 28% on the profit before tax (91)(72)
Increase/(decrease) in tax expense due to:
• share of associates’ and joint ventures’ tax paid earnings 1 2
• capital gain – 1
• non-deductible impairments – (4)
• other differences (1)(1)
Tax expense attributable to profit from ordinary activities (91) (74)
Represented by:
Current tax expense (97)(80)
Deferred tax recognised in the income statement 6 6
The tax expense charged to the income statement includes both the current year’s provision and the income tax effect of:
• taxable temporary differences, except those arising from initial recognition of goodwill; and
• deductible temporary differences to the extent that it is probable that they will be utilised.
Deferred Tax
Deferred tax is provided in full, using the liability method, on temporary differences arising between the tax and accounting
bases of the Group’s assets and liabilities. A deferred tax asset is only recognised to the extent that there will be future taxable
profit to utilise the temporary difference.
Property, plant and equipment is held on capital account for income tax purposes. Where assets are revalued, with no similar
adjustment to the tax base, a taxable temporary difference is created that is recognised in deferred tax. The deferred tax
liability on these revaluations is unlikely to crystallise in the foreseeable future under existing income tax legislation.
Assets
2018
$M
Assets
2017
$M
Liabilities
2018
$M
Liabilities
2017
$M
Net
2018
$M
Net
2017
$M
(i) Recognised deferred tax assets and liabilities
Property, plant and equipment – – (1,151) (1,156) (1,151) (1,156)
Financial instruments 5 29 – – 5 29
Employee benefits and provisions 2 2 – – 2 2
Other 13 14 – – 13 14
20 45 (1,151) (1,156) (1,131) (1,111)
Property,
plant and
equipment
$M
Financial
instruments
$M
Employee
entitlements
$M
Other
$M
To t a l
$M
(ii) Movement in deferred tax
Balance as at 1 July 2016 (1,158) 51 2 12 (1,093)
Charged/(credited) to the income statement 17 (10) – (1) 6
Charged/(credited) to other comprehensive income (15) (11) – – (26)
Other movements – (1) – 3 2
Balance as at 30 June 2017 (1,156) 29 2 14 (1,111)
Balance as at 1 July 2017 (1,156) 29 2 14 (1,111)
Charged/(credited) to the income statement 21 (14) – (1) 6
Charged/(credited) to other comprehensive income (17) (9) – – (26)
Balance as at 30 June 2018 (1,152) 6 2 13 (1,131)
Tax deductions for building depreciation were disallowed by the Inland Revenue from 1 July 2011. Since then, the Group has
maintained the view that both hydro-electric and geothermal powerhouse assets are plant and not buildings and therefore
should not be captured by this change. Inland Revenue has accepted the Group’s view in respect of hydro-electric powerhouse
assets, but not in respect of geothermal powerhouse assets.
During the period ended 30 June 2017, the Group filed proceedings with the High Court to challenge the Inland Revenue’s
position in relation to geothermal powerhouse assets. The case is expected to be heard in the period ending 30 June 2019.
In the event the Group is unsuccessful, this could result in an additional deferred tax liability (and tax expense) of up to
$6 million at that time.
NOTE 7. INVENTORIES
Cost is determined on a weighted average basis and includes expenditure incurred in acquiring inventories and bringing them
to their final condition and location. Consumable stores of $26 million (2017: $28 million) are held to service and repair
operating plant. Meter stock of $9 million (2017: $11 million) is held in inventory until it is deployed into the field at which time
it is transferred into property, plant and equipment.
16 // 17
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2018
NOTE 8. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
Generation
assets at fair
value
$M
Meters at
cost
$M
Other assets
at cost
$M
Capital work
in progress
at cost
$M
To t a l
$M
Year ended 30 June 2017
Opening net book value 5,269 60 45 45 5,419
Additions 60 5 1 32 98
Transfers 18 – 3 (21) –
Charged to the Income Statement – – – (1) (1)
Net revaluation movement 52 – – – 52
Impairments (4) – – – (4)
Depreciation charge for the year (154) (12) (10) – (176)
Closing net book value 5,241 53 39 55 5,388
Balance at 30 June 2017
Cost or valuation 5,241 172 131 55 5,599
Accumulated depreciation – (119) (92) – (211)
Net book value 5,241 53 39 55 5,388
Year ended 30 June 2018
Opening net book value 5,241 53 39 55 5,388
Additions 52 6 5 31 94
Transfers 25 – 3 (28) –
Net revaluation movement55 – – – 55
Depreciation charge for the year (158) (11) (10) – (179)
Closing net book value 5,215 48 37 58 5,358
Balance at 30 June 2018
Cost or valuation 5,215 178 137 58 5,588
Accumulated depreciation – (130) (100) – (230)
Net book value 5,215 48 37 58 5,358
Assets carrying values
The cost of property, plant and equipment purchased comprises the consideration given to acquire the assets plus other
directly attributable costs incurred in bringing the assets to the location and condition necessary for their intended use.
The cost of property, plant and equipment constructed by the Group, including capital work in progress, includes the cost of all
materials used in construction, associated direct labour and an appropriate proportion of variable and fixed overheads.
Financing costs attributable to a project are capitalised at the Group’s specific project finance interest rate, where these meet
certain time and monetary materiality limits. Costs of testing whether the assets are functioning properly, after deducting the
net proceeds from power generation, are also capitalised. Costs cease to be capitalised as soon as an asset is ready for
productive use.
Costs incurred in obtaining resource consents are capitalised and recognised as a non-current asset where it is probable they
will give rise to future economic benefits. These costs are depreciated over the life of the consent on a straight-line basis.
Generation plant and equipment is measured at fair value less accumulated depreciation. Any surplus on revaluation of an
individual item of property, plant and equipment is transferred directly to the asset revaluation reserve unless it offsets a
previous decrease in value recognised in the income statement, in which case it is recognised in the income statement. A
deficit on revaluation of an individual item of property, plant and equipment is recognised in the income statement in the
period it arises where it exceeds any surplus previously transferred to the asset revaluation reserve. Any accumulated
depreciation at the date of the revaluation is eliminated against the gross carrying amount of the asset and the net amount is
restated to the revalued amount of the asset. Additions to property, plant and equipment stated at valuation subsequent to the
most recent valuation are recorded at cost. All other items of property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost less
depreciation and impairments.
Capital work in progress at cost relating to intangible assets is now shown within note 9. Historic comparatives have been
restated as a result of this change.
Assets carried at fair value
All generation assets shown at valuation (except Resource Management Act consents) were revalued using a net present value
methodology by PricewaterhouseCoopers, an independent valuer, as at 30 June 2018. This resulted in an increase to the
carrying value of the Group’s geothermal generation assets of $55 million in the current year. This is in addition to the
$52 million revaluation increase recognised across the Group’s geothermal generation assets in 2017. As a consequence of the
revaluation, accumulated depreciation on these geothermal assets has been reset to nil.
The key assumptions that are used in the valuation include the forecast of the future wholesale electricity price path, volumes,
projected operational and capital expenditure, capacity and life assumptions and discount rate. In all cases there is an element
of judgement required as they make use of unobservable inputs including wholesale electricity prices of between $63/MWh
and $105/MWh (2017: $70/MWh and $104/MWh), average operational expenditure of $160 million p.a. (2017: $158 million
p.a.), net average production volumes of 6,620/GWh p.a. (2017: 6,567/GWh p.a.) and a post-tax discount rate of between 7.5%
and 7.9% (2017: 7.5% and 7.9%). The valuation also assumed the on-going operation of New Zealand Aluminium Smelters
Limited at Tiwai Point and that the current regulatory environment (including any changes to the cost of fuel) is maintained.
The discounted cash flow valuation approach assumes 100% control and consequently a control premium should be applied if
using an equity valuation technique to derive comparative asset values.
The following table outlines the valuation impact of changes to assumptions, keeping all other valuation inputs constant, that
the valuation is most sensitive to.
SensitivityValuation impact
2018
$M
2017
$M
Future wholesale electricity price path+/- 10%$783 / ($790)$781 / ($790)
Discount rate+/- 0.5%($496) / $592($502) / $599
Operational expenditure+/- 10%($231) / $230($231) / $231
The carrying amount of revalued generation assets, had they been recognised at cost, would have been $1,977 million (2017:
$1,978 million).
Depreciation
Depreciation is provided on a straight-line basis on all property, plant and equipment other than freehold land, capital work in
progress and exploration and evaluation assets, so as to write down the assets to their estimated residual value over their
expected useful lives.
The annual depreciation rates are as follows:
20182017
Office fixture and fittings, including fitout2-50%2-50%
Generation assets:
• Hydro and thermal generation1-33%1-33%
• Other generation2-33%2-33%
Meters3-33%3-33%
Computer hardware and tangible software5-50%5-50%
Other plant and equipment2-50%2-50%
Vehicles5-33%5-33%
18 // 19
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2018
NOTE 9. INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Intangible
software
$M
Rights
$M
Emissions
units
$M
Work In
Progress
$M
To t a l
$M
Year ended 30 June 2017
Opening net book value 17 23 28 22 90
Additions 7 – 7 20 34
Transfers 5 1 – (6) –
Charged to the Income Statement – – – (2) (2)
Disposals – – (21) – (21)
Impaired assets – (1) – – (1)
Amortisation for the year (12) (1) – – (13)
Closing net book amount 17 22 14 34 87
Balance at 30 June 2017
Cost 140 34 14 34 222
Accumulated amortisation (123) (12) – – (135)
Net book value 17 22 14 34 87
Year ended 30 June 2018
Opening net book value 17 22 14 34 87
Additions 20 – 7 10 37
Transfers 34 – – (34) –
Surrendered units – – (5) – (5)
Amortisation for the year (16) (2) – – (18)
Closing net book amount 55 20 16 10 101
Balance at 30 June 2018
Cost 194 34 16 10 254
Accumulated amortisation (139) (14) – – (153)
Net book value 55 20 16 10 101
Software
Acquired computer software licenses are capitalised on the basis of the costs incurred to acquire and bring to use. These costs
are amortised over their remaining estimated useful lives of between 2 to 15 years (2017: between 2 to 15 years). As these
assets are deemed to have a finite life, impairment testing will only be performed when there is an indication that the
intangible asset may be impaired.
Rights
Rights, of which land access rights are the most significant, acquired to further the Group’s generation development
programme are stated at cost less accumulated amortisation and any accumulated impairment losses. Rights, which have a
finite life, are amortised over the life of the rights, which range from 3 to 25 years (2017: 3 to 25 years). Testing for impairment
will only arise when there is an indication that the asset may be impaired.
Emissions units and emissions obligations
Emissions units that have been allocated by the Government under the Projects to Reduce Emissions scheme are recorded at
nominal value (nil value). Purchased emissions units are recorded at cost (purchase price). Emissions units, whether allocated
or purchased, are recorded as intangible assets. Emissions units are not revalued subsequent to initial recognition.
Emissions units that are surrendered to creditors in compensation for their emissions obligations are recognised as an
expense in the income statement and a reduction to intangible assets in the balance sheet, based on the weighted average
cost of the units surrendered.
Emissions obligations are recognised as a current liability as the obligation is incurred. Up to the level of units held, the liability
is recorded at the carrying value of those units intended to settle the liability. Forward contracts for the purchase of emissions
units are recognised when the contracts are settled.
NOTE 10. INVESTMENT AND ADVANCES TO ASSOCIATES AND JOINT ARRANGEMENTS (JOINT
VENTURES AND JOINT OPERATIONS)
The Group financial statements include the following:
Interest held
Name of entityPrincipal activityType20182017Country
TPC Holdings LimitedInvestment holdingAssociate25.00%25.00%New Zealand
RotokawaSteamfield operationJoint operation64.80%64.80%New Zealand
Nga Awa PuruaElectricity generationJoint operation65.00%65.00%New Zealand
EnergySource LLCInvestment holdingJoint venture20.86%20.86%United States
EnergySource Minerals LLCMineral extractionJoint venture20.84%–United States
Hudson Ranch I Holdings LLCElectricity generationJoint venture75.00%75.00%United States
AssociatesJoint ventures
2018
$M
2017
$M
2018
$M
2017
$M
Balance at the beginning of the year76 77 – 15
Share of earnings2 6 – –
Share of movement in other comprehensive income 14 (2) – (12)
Distributions received during the year (4) (5) – (2)
Impaired advance to joint venture – – – (1)
Balance at the end of the year 88 76 – –
At the end of the year the Group had outstanding advances to its Rotokawa joint venture partner in the amount of $7 million
(2017: $8 million) and its associate TPC Holdings Limited of $4 million (2017: $4 million). For terms and conditions of these
related party receivables refer to note 17.
Due to the nature of the contractual arrangements that surround the joint venture entities, which allow for a reduction in the
Group’s economic interest once prescribed preferred returns have been achieved, the share of movements in earnings and
reserves has been calculated based on the Hypothetical Liquidation at Book Value method. This method more closely aligns
the recognition of earnings through time with the expected contractually agreed economic outcomes compared to the
recognition of earnings based on a strict percentage of ownership.
In compliance with the equity method under NZ IAS 28 - Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures, the Group has yet to
recognise its share of losses relating to Energy Source LLC amounting to US$3 million (2017: US$3 million).
During the period, the Group acquired a 19.99% shareholding in Tilt Renewables Limited for $144 million or $2.30 per share.
Tilt is a listed company on the NZSX and ASX. The shareholding is recognised as an available for sale investment, and had a
market value of $2.07 per share or $130 million at 30 June 2018 (refer to note 20 for further information).
NOTE 11. RECEIVABLES, PAYABLES AND ACCRUALS
2018
$M
2017
$M
Receivables
Trade receivables and accruals 219 233
Allowance for impairment loss (2) (2)
Net trade receivables and accruals 217 231
Prepayments 9 9
226 240
Revenue accruals for unread gas and electricity meters at balance date involves an estimate of consumption for each unread
meter, based on the customer’s past consumption history.
Trade receivables are non-interest bearing and are generally on 30 day terms. For terms and conditions of related party
receivables refer to note 17.
20 // 21
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2018
The Group recognises an allowance for impairment loss when there is objective evidence that the Group will not be able to
collect amounts due according to the original terms of the receivable. An allowance charge of $3 million (2017: $3 million) was
recognised during the year. Receivables of $3 million (2017: $3 million) which were deemed uncollectable were written off.
2018
$M
2017
$M
Receivables past due but not considered impaired:
Less than one month past due 6 7
Greater than one month past due 2 2
8 9
2018
$M
2017
$M
Payables and accruals
Trade payables and accruals 179 194
Employee entitlements 8 7
Sundry creditors 17 5
204 206
Trade payables are non-interest bearing and are normally settled on 30 to 60 day terms.
NOTE 12. PROVISIONS
2018
$M
2017
$M
Balance at the beginning of the year 54 54
Provisions made during the year 1 1
Provisions used during the year (2) (4)
Provisions reversed during the year (3) –
Discounting movement 1 3
Balance at the end of the year 51 54
Current – 1
Non-current 51 53
51 54
Provisions have been recognised for the abandonment and subsequent restoration of areas from which geothermal resources
have been utilised. The provision is calculated based on the present value of Management’s best estimate of the expenditure
required, and the likely timing of settlement. Changes in these estimates made during the year are reported as an increase in
provisions and a reduction in revaluation reserves. The increase in provision resulting from the passage of time (the discount
effect) is recognised as an interest expense.
NOTE 11. RECEIVABLES, PAYABLES AND ACCRUALS (CONTINUED)
NOTE 13. BORROWINGS
Borrowing
currency
denominationMaturity Coupon
2018
$M
2017
$M
Bank facilitiesNZDVariousFloating 91 –
Commercial paper programmeNZD< 3 monthsFloating170 75
Wholesale bondsNZDMar–20195.03%76 76
Wholesale bondsNZDFeb–20208.21%31 31
USPP – US$125mUSDDec–20204.25%163 164
Wholesale / credit wrapperNZDSep–2021Floating300 301
USPP – US$30mUSDDec–20224.35%39 39
Wholesale bondsNZDMar–20235.79%25 25
USPP – US$45mUSDDec–20254.60%59 58
Capital bondsNZDJul–20446.90%305 305
Deferred financing costs(5) (6)
Fair value adjustments51 39
Carrying value of loans1,305 1,107
Current345 83
Non-current960 1,024
1,305 1,107
The Group has entered into a Master Trust Deed and Supplementary Trust Deeds for all its NZD denominated Senior Fixed
and Floating Rate Bonds with the New Zealand Guardian Trust Group Limited, acting as trustee for the holders. The Group has
agreed, subject to certain exceptions, not to create or permit to exist a security interest over or affecting its assets to secure
indebtedness, and to maintain certain financial covenants. There has been no breach of the terms of these deeds.
The Group has entered into a negative pledge deed in favour of its bank financiers in which the Group has agreed, subject
to certain exceptions, not to create or permit to exist a security interest over or affecting its assets to secure its indebtedness,
and to maintain certain financial ratios in relation to the Group. These undertakings and covenants also apply to the US Private
Placement terms and conditions. There has been no breach of the terms of this deed or the terms and conditions of the US
Private Placement.
The Group has $650 million of committed and unsecured bank loan facilities as at 30 June 2018 (30 June 2017:
$350 million) of which $100 million was not available for drawdown until August 2018. Subsequent to the reporting period,
the Company has cancelled $100 million of facilities and had $100 million of facilities mature. Of the loan facilities of
$450 million available in August 2018, $50 million expires in September 2019, $100 million expires in June 2021, $100
million expires in August 2022 and a rolling bank loan of $200 million currently expires in December 2019.
The Group has a $200m Commercial Paper programme which is fully backed by committed and undrawn bank facilities.
Notes issued under the programme are short-term money market instruments, unsecured and unsubordinated and targeted
at professional investors. The programme is rated A2 by S&P.
22 // 23
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2018
NOTE 14. FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT
The Group’s overall risk management programme focuses on the unpredictability of financial markets and seeks to proactively
manage these risks with the aim of protecting shareholder wealth. Exposure to price, credit, foreign exchange, liquidity and
interest rate risks arise in the normal course of the Group’s business. The Group’s principal financial instruments comprise
cash and cash equivalents, trade receivables and accruals (not prepayments), advances, payables and accruals, borrowings
and derivative financial instruments.
(A) MARKET RISK
Price risk – energy contracts
The Group enters into energy contracts that establish a fixed price at which future specified quantities of electricity are
purchased and sold. The energy contracts are periodically settled with any difference between the contract price and the spot
market price settled between the parties. At balance date, the principal value of energy contracts, including both buy and sell
contracts, with remaining terms of up to 13 years (2017: 14 years), were $1,520 million (2017: $1,674 million).
Foreign exchange risk
The Group is exposed to foreign exchange risk as a result of transactions denominated in a currency other than the Group’s
functional currency. The currencies giving rise to this risk are primarily US Dollar, Japanese Yen and Euro.
Foreign exchange risk arises from future commercial transactions (including the purchase of capital equipment and
maintenance services), recognised assets and liabilities (including borrowings) and net investments in foreign operations. It is
the Group’s policy to enter into forward exchange contracts to hedge its committed expenditure programme. At balance date
the principal or contract amounts of foreign currency forward exchange contracts were $21 million (2017: $42 million).
Interest rate risk
The Group has exposure to interest rate risk to the extent that it borrows for fixed terms at floating interest rates. The Group
uses interest rate swaps and interest rate options to manage this exposure. At balance date, the contract principal amount of
interest rate swaps outstanding (including forward starts) was $2,466 million (2017: $2,976 million).
Sensitivity analysis
The following summarises the potential impact of increases or decreases in the relevant market risk exposures of the Group
on post tax profit and on other components of equity. The analysis does not take into account dynamic market response over
time, which could be material.
Price risk
Sensitivity analysis is based on an assessment of the reasonably possible movements in forward price.
Impact on post tax profitImpact on equity
2018
$M
2017
$M
2018
$M
2017
$M
Group
Electricity forward price increased by 10%(8)(6)(26)(34)
Electricity forward price decreased by 10%8 6 21 33
Foreign exchange risk
Sensitivity analysis is based on the impact of the New Zealand Dollar weakening or strengthening against the most significant
currencies for which the Group has foreign exchange exposure, allowing for reasonably possible movements in foreign
exchange rates over a one year period based on the average actual movements experienced over the prior 10 years.
Impact on post tax profitImpact on equity
2018
$M
2017
$M
2018
$M
2017
$M
New Zealand Dollar – Euro
Currency strengthens by 10% – – (1) (2)
Currency weakens by 10% – – 1 2
Interest rate risk
Sensitivity analysis is based on an assessment of the reasonably possible movement in the 10 year swap rate over a one year
period based on actual movements over the last 10 years. The movement in post tax profits are due to higher/lower interest
costs from variable rate debt and cash balances combined with the result of fair value changes in interest rate swaps and
options that are valid economic hedges but which do not qualify for hedge accounting under NZ IAS 39. The movements in
other components of equity result from fair value changes in interest rate swaps and options that have qualified for hedge
accounting.
Impact on post tax profitImpact on equity
2018
$M
2017
$M
2018
$M
2017
$M
Interest rates higher by 100 bps (13)(2)20 19
Interest rates lower by 100 bps14 2 (21)(20)
(B) CREDIT RISK
The Group manages its exposure to credit risk under policies approved by the Board of Directors. The Group performs credit
assessments on all electricity customers and normally requires a bond from commercial customers who have yet to establish
a suitable credit history. Customer bonds are held in a separate bank account.
It is the Group’s policy to only enter into derivative transactions with banks that it has signed an ISDA master agreement with,
and which have a minimum long-term S&P (or Moody’s equivalent) credit rating of A- or higher.
With respect to energy contracts, the Group has potential credit risk exposure to the counterparty dependent on the current
market price relative to contracted price until maturity.
In the event of a failure by a retailer to settle its obligations to the Energy Clearing House, following the exhaustion of its
prudential security, a proportionate share of the shortfall will be assumed by all generator class market participants. The Group
consequently will be impacted in the event that this occurs.
The carrying amounts of financial assets recognised in the balance sheet best represent the Group’s maximum exposure to
credit risk at the reporting date without taking account of any collateral held by way of customer bonds.
(C) LIQUIDITY RISK
The Group manages its exposure to liquidity risk under policies approved by the Board of Directors. Policies require that
prescribed headroom is available in undrawn and committed facilities to cover unanticipated needs and that a limited amount
of facilities mature over the immediate 12 month forward-looking period. The Group’s objective is to maintain a balance
between continuity of funding and flexibility through the use of various funding sources.
Non-derivative financial liabilities
The following liquidity risk disclosures reflect all contractually fixed payoffs, repayments and interest from recognised non-
derivative financial liabilities. The timing of cash flows for non-derivative financial liabilities is based on the contractual terms
of the underlying contract. It should be noted that the amounts presented are contractual undiscounted cash flows,
consequently the totals will not reconcile with the amounts recognised in the balance sheet.
24 // 25
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2018
While the tables below give the impression of a liquidity shortfall, the analysis does not take into account expected future
operating cash flows or committed and undrawn debt facilities that will provide additional liquidity support.
Less than 6
months
$M
6 to 12
months
$M
1 to 5
years
$M
Later than
5 years
$M
To t a l
$M
June 2018
Liquid financial assets
Cash and cash equivalents 5 – – – 5
Receivables 226 – – – 226
231 – – – 231
Financial liabilities
Payables and accruals (198) – (6) – (204)
Loans (285) (98) (668) (770) (1,821)
(483) (98) (674) (770) (2,025)
Net inflow/(outflow) (252) (98) (674) (770) (1,794)
Less than 6
months
$M
6 to 12
months
$M
1 to 5 years
$M
Later than 5
years
$M
To t a l
$M
June 2017
Liquid financial assets
Cash and cash equivalents 30 – – – 30
Receivables 240 – – – 240
270 – – – 270
Financial liabilities
Payables and accruals (202) – (4) – (206)
Loans (99) (24) (724) (905) (1,752)
(301) (24) (728) (905) (1,958)
Net inflow/(outflow) (31) (24) (728) (905) (1,688)
The comparative liquidity risk disclosures for 1 to 5 years and later than 5 years have been amended to reflect the contracted
maturity date of the capital bonds, and an estimate of associated interest on the capital bonds to maturity. The future interest
cost is based on the forecast floating rate plus the contracted margin. The company has the option to redeem all or some of
the bonds on the reset date, July 2019.
Derivative financial liabilities
The table below details the liquidity risk arising from derivative liabilities held by the Group at balance date. Net settled
derivatives include interest rate derivatives and electricity price derivatives. Gross settled derivatives relate to foreign exchange
derivatives that are used to hedge future purchase commitments. Foreign exchange derivatives may be rolled on an
instalment basis until the underlying transaction occurs. While the maturity of these derivatives are short-term the underlying
expenditure is forecast to occur over different time periods. The table also summarise the payments that are expected to be
made in relation to derivative liabilities. The Group also expects to receive funds relating to derivative asset settlements. The
expectation of cash receipts in relation to derivative assets should also be considered when assessing the ability of the Group
to meet its obligations.
NOTE 14. FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT (CONTINUED)
Less than 6
months
$M
6 to 12
months
$M
1 to 5 years
$M
Later than 5
years
$M
To t a l
$M
June 2018
Derivative liabilities – net settled (27) (12) (52) (15) (106)
Derivative liabilities – gross settled
Inflows 19 1 –– 20
Outflows (19) (1)–– (20)
Net maturity (27) (12) (52) (15) (106)
Less than 6
months
$M
6 to 12
months
$M
1 to 5 years
$M
Later than 5
years
$M
To t a l
$M
June 2017
Derivative liabilities – net settled(54)(31)(62)(25) (172)
Derivative liabilities – gross settled
Inflows 41 – – – 41
Outflows (42) – – – (42)
Net maturity (55) (31) (62) (25) (173)
(D) FAIR VALUE ESTIMATION
Fair values
The carrying amount of financial assets and liabilities recorded in the financial statements approximates their fair values
except for: (i) the Fixed Rate Bonds, the Floating Rate Bonds and the US Private Placement, the fair values for which have been
calculated at $138 million (2017: $140 million), $293 million (2017: $287 million) and $301 million (2017: $289 million)
respectively; and (ii) the Capital Bonds, the fair value for which has been calculated at $313 million (2017: $317 million). Fair
values are based on quoted market prices and inputs for each bond issue.
Valuation techniques
The Group uses various methods in estimating the fair value of a financial instrument. The methods comprise:
• Level 1 – the fair value is calculated using quoted prices in active markets;
• Level 2 – the fair value is estimated using inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the
asset or liability, either directly (as prices) or indirectly (derived from prices); and
• Level 3 – the fair value is estimated using inputs that are not based on observable market data.
As at 30 June 2018 all of the Group’s financial instruments carried at fair value were categorised as level 2, except for
electricity price derivatives. Electricity price derivative assets of $21 million were categorised as level 1 (2017: $8 million) and
$63 million were categorised as level 3 (2017: $63 million). Electricity price derivative liabilities of $1 million were categorised as
level 1 (2017: $6 million) and $9 million were categorised as level 3 (2017: $55 million).
Financial instruments that are measured using a valuation technique with only observable market inputs, or unobservable
inputs that are not significant to the overall valuation, include interest rate derivatives and foreign exchange derivatives not
traded on a recognised exchange.
Financial instruments that use a valuation technique which includes non-market observable data include non-exchange
traded electricity contracts which are valued using a discounted cash flow methodology using a combination of ASX market
prices for the first three years, combined with Management’s internal view of forward prices for the remainder of the contract’s
term. Management’s internal view of forward prices incorporates a minimum price of $63/MWh and a maximum price of
$105/MWh (2017: minimum price of $70/MWh and a maximum price of $104/MWh) over the period in question (in real
terms) and is determined by a demand supply based fundamental model which takes account of current hydrological
conditions, future inflows, an assessment of thermal fuel costs, anticipated demand and supply conditions and future
committed generation capacity.
Where the fair value of a derivative is calculated as the present value of the estimated future cash flows of the instrument
there are two key inputs being used: the forward price curve and the discount rate. Where the derivative is an option, then the
volatility of the forward price is another key input. The selection of inputs requires significant judgement, and therefore there is
a range of reasonably possible assumptions in respect of these inputs that could be used in estimating the fair values of these
derivatives. Maximum use is made of observable market data when selecting inputs and developing assumptions for the
valuation technique.
26 // 27
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2018
Level 3 sensitivity analysis
The following summarises the potential impact of increases or decreases in price risk exposures of the Group on post tax
profit. Sensitivity analysis is based on an assessment of the reasonably possible movements in forward price.
Impact on post tax profit
2018
$M
2017
$M
Group
Electricity forward price increased by 10%(1)1
Electricity forward price decreased by 10%1 (1)
2018
$M
2017
$M
Reconciliation of level 3 fair value movements
Opening balance 7 (12)
New contracts 2 (4)
Matured contracts 8 –
Gains and losses
Through the income statement (7) (1)
Through other comprehensive income 44 24
Closing balance 54 7
Level 3 fair value movements recognised within the income statement of the Group are recognised within ‘change in the fair
value of financial instruments’. Comparative movements have been reclassified to reflect new and matured contracts that do
not qualify for hedge accounting.
Deferred ‘inception’ gains/(losses)
There is a presumption that when derivative contracts are entered into on an arm’s length basis, fair value at inception would
be zero. The contract price of non exchange traded electricity derivative contracts are agreed on a bilateral basis, the pricing
for which may differ from the prevailing derived market price curve for a variety of reasons. In these circumstances an
inception adjustment is made to bring the initial fair value of the contract to zero at inception. This inception adjustment is
amortised over the life of the contract by adjusting the future price path used to determine the fair value of the derivatives by
a constant amount to return the initial fair value to zero.
The table below details the movements in inception value gains/(losses) included in the fair value of derivative financial assets
and liabilities as at 30 June.
2018
$M
2017
$M
Electricity price derivatives
Opening deferred inception gains/(losses) (6) (4)
Deferred inception gains (losses) on new hedges (6) 3
Deferred inception losses realised during the year (16) (5)
Closing inception gains/(losses) (28) (6)
(E) CAPITAL RISK MANAGEMENT
Management seeks to maintain a sustainable financial structure for the Group having regard to the risks from predicted short
and medium-term economic, market and hydrological conditions along with estimated financial performance. Capital is
managed to provide sufficient funds to undertake required asset reinvestment as well as to finance new generation
development projects and other growth opportunities to increase shareholder value at a rate similar to comparable private
sector companies.
In order to maintain or adjust the capital structure, changes may be made to the amount paid as dividends to shareholders,
capital may be returned or injected or assets sold to reduce borrowings.
NOTE 14. FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT (CONTINUED)
Consistent with other companies in the industry, the Group monitors capital on the basis of its gearing ratio. This ratio is
calculated as net debt divided by total capital. Net debt is calculated as total borrowings (both current and non-current) less
cash and cash equivalents. Total capital is calculated as shareholders’ equity plus net debt. The gearing ratio is calculated
below:
2018
$M
2017
$M
Borrowings at carrying value1,305 1,107
Fair value adjustments US Private Placement(51)(39)
Less cash and cash equivalents(5)(30)
Net debt1,249 1,038
Total equity3,2863,308
Total capital4,5354,346
27.5%23.9%
Gearing ratio
Under the negative pledge deed in favour of its bank financiers the Group must, in addition to not exceeding its maximum
gearing ratio, exceed minimum interest cover ratios and a minimum shareholder equity threshold.
The Group seeks to maintain a debt to EBITDAF ratio of less than 3.0 times, on average through time, to maintain credit
metrics sufficient to support its credit rating on an on-going basis. For the purpose of calculating this ratio and consistent with
the rating agency treatment, the calculation of debt is deemed to be all senior debt and 50% of subordinated debt. For the
year ended 30 June 2018, the Group had a debt to EBITDAF ratio of 2.0 times (2017: 1.8 times).
NOTE 15. DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The fair values of derivative financial instruments together with the designation of their hedging relationship are summarised
below, based on maturity date:
2018
$M
2017
$M
CURRENT ASSETS
Interest rate derivative 11 8
Electricity price derivative 19 10
Cross currency interest rate derivative 1 –
31 18
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Interest rate derivative 18 29
Electricity price derivative 5 18
Foreign exchange derivative – 1
Cross currency interest rate derivative 1 1
24 49
NON-CURRENT ASSETS
Interest rate derivative 11 27
Electricity price derivative 64 61
Cross currency interest rate derivative 35 23
110 111
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES
Interest rate derivative 65 90
Cross currency interest rate derivative – margin 3 5
Electricity price derivative 5 44
73 139
28 // 29
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2018
The majority of interest rate derivatives, short-term low value foreign exchange derivatives, and short-term low value exchange
traded energy contracts, while economic hedges, are not designated as hedges under NZ IAS 39 but are treated as at fair
value through profit and loss. All other interest rate derivatives (predominantly forward starting derivatives), foreign exchange
and electricity prices derivatives (except those described below) are designated as cash flow hedges under NZ IAS 39.
Cross currency interest rate swaps, which are used to manage the combined interest and foreign currency risk on borrowings
issued in foreign currency, have been split into two components for the purpose of hedge designation. The hedge of the
benchmark interest rate is designated as a fair value hedge and the hedge of the issuance margin is designated as a cash
flow hedge.
Electricity contracts not designated as hedges for accounting purposes
The Group has an electricity hedge contract with the Tuaropaki Power Company. The contract settles against a moving hedge
index rather than wholesale electricity prices.
Basis swaps: The Group has entered into a number of contracts to hedge wholesale electricity price risk between North and
South Island generically called basis swaps. The most significant is a contract with Meridian Energy which has a remaining life
of 7 years.
The changes in fair values of derivative financial instruments recognised in the income statement and other comprehensive
income are summarised below:
Income statement
Other comprehensive
income
2018
$M
2017
$M
2018
$M
2017
$M
Cross currency interest rate derivatives 12 (23) – –
Borrowings – fair value change (12) 24 – –
– 1 – –
Interest rate derivatives 40 38 (18) 13
Cross currency interest rate derivatives – margin – – 2 1
Electricity price derivatives 12 (9)49 23
Foreign exchange rate derivatives – – – (1)
Ineffectiveness of cash flow hedges recognised in the income statement (3) 1 – –
Total change in fair value of financial instruments 49 31 33 36
Movement in cash flow hedge reserve
2018
$M
2017
$M
Opening balance (53) (76)
The effective portion of cash flow hedges recognised in the reserve 33 36
Amortisation of fair values
1
(1) (1)
The amount transferred to balance sheet5 1
Equity accounted share of associates’ movement in other comprehensive income 2 (2)
Tax effect of movements(10) (11)
Closing balance (24) (53)
1 Amounts reclassified to the income statement recognised in amortisation.
NOTE 15. DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (CONTINUED)
NOTE 16. RECONCILIATION OF PROFIT FOR THE YEAR TO NET CASH FLOWS
FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
2018
$M
2017
$M
Profit for the year234 184
Items classified as investing or financing activities
• Foreign exchange movements – –
• Net interest accrual1 1
Adjustments for:
Depreciation and amortisation 197 189
Carbon costs 4 –
Dividend income received from the investment in Tilt Renewables (1) –
Net (gain)/loss on sale of property, plant and equipment (2) 2
Net gain on disposal of emission units – (5)
Change in the fair value of financial instruments (49) (31)
Impaired assets – 18
Movement in effect of discounting on long-term provisions(3) 2
Share of earnings of associates and joint ventures (2) (6)
Other non-cash items(1) (1)
Net cash provided by operating activities before change in assets and liabilities378 353
Change in assets and liabilities during the year:
• Decrease/(increase) in trade receivables and prepayments 12 (42)
• (Increase)/decrease in consumable inventories(1) 3
• (Decrease)/increase in trade payables and accruals (6) 40
• (Decrease)/increase in provision for tax (6) 26
• Decrease in deferred tax (6) (8)
Net cash inflow from operating activities 371 372
30 // 31
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2018
NOTE 17. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Majority shareholder
The majority shareholder of Mercury NZ Limited is the Government. All transactions with the Government and other entities
wholly or partly owned by the Government are on normal commercial terms. Transactions cover a variety of services including
trading energy, postal, travel and tax.
Transactions with related parties
Mercury NZ Limited has investments in subsidiaries, associates and joint arrangements, all of which are considered related parties.
As these are consolidated financial statements, transactions between related parties within the Group have been eliminated.
Consequently, only those transactions between entities which have some owners external to the Group have been reported below:
Transaction value
2018
$M
2017
$M
Associates
Management fees and service agreements received 14 12
Energy contract settlements received/(paid) 6 (1)
Joint operations
Management fees and service agreements received 11 15
Energy contract settlements received/(paid) 2 (9)
Interest income 1 1
Payments for inventory – (1)
Energy contracts, management and other services are made on normal commercial terms.
An advance to TPC Holdings Limited of $4 million (2017: $4 million) is interest free and repayable on demand subject to
certain conditions being met.
The long-term advance to our Rotokawa Joint Venture partner carries a floating interest rate. Repayments under the advance
are linked to the level of receipts under the geothermal energy supply agreement. There is no fixed repayment date, the
agreement will terminate on full payment of the outstanding balance.
No related party debts have been written off, forgiven, or any impairment charge booked.
Transaction value
2018
$000
2017
$000
Key management personnel compensation (paid and payable) comprised:
Directors’ fees 960 885
Benefits for the Chief Executive and Senior Management:
Salary and other short-term benefits 6,275 6,175
Share-based payments 553 430
7,788 7,4 9 0
The year-on-year increase in directors’ fees is due to the appointment of an additional director to bring the Board to its full
complement.
Other transactions with key management personnel
Key management personnel are those people with responsibility and authority for planning, directing and controlling the
activities of the entity. Key management personnel for the Group are considered to be the Directors and Senior Management.
Directors and employees of the Group deal with Mercury NZ Limited as electricity consumers on normal terms and conditions,
with staff discounts for employees, within the ordinary course of trading activities. A number of key management personnel
also provide directorship services to other third party entities. A number of these entities transacted with the Group, in all
circumstances on normal commercial terms during the reporting period.
A number of key management personnel provide directorship services to direct subsidiaries and other third party entities as
part of their employment without receiving any additional remuneration. Again, a number of these entities transacted with the
Group, in all circumstances on normal commercial terms in the reporting period.
The Group purchases directors and officers insurance for the benefit of key management personnel in relation to the services
they provide to the Group.
NOTE 18. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Capital Operating lease
Other operating
commitments
Commitments
2018
$M
2017
$M
2018
$M
2017
$M
2018
$M
2017
$M
Within one year 40 46 7 6 7 7
One to five years 42 54 33 31 17 9
Later than five years 24 28 63 73 63 64
106 128 103 110 87 80
Capital commitments include both commitments to purchase property, plant and equipment as well as intangible
commitments. Intangible commitments include commitments to purchase emissions units. In the event the New Zealand
emissions trading scheme (NZ ETS) is terminated, the existing forward purchase agreements for the acquisition of emissions
units which cover the 9 year period from the end of the reporting period, will also terminate.
Operating leases are of a rental nature and are on normal commercial terms and conditions. The majority of the lease
commitments are for building accommodation, the leases for which have remaining terms of between 1 and 17 years and
include an allowance for either annual, biennial or triennial reviews. The remainder of the operating leases relate to vehicles
and plant and equipment.
Contingencies
The Group holds land and has interests in fresh water and geothermal resources that are subject to claims that have been
brought against the Government. On 29 August 2014, the Supreme Court gave its decision in Paki v Attorney-General and
dismissed the claimants’ action seeking a declaration that the Government holds those parts of the bed of the Waikato River
which adjoin former Pouakani land on trust for the Pouakani people on the basis it was incorrectly advanced. The Supreme
Court decision has left open the possibility of further litigation in respect of ownership of that land currently held by the Group.
The Group has received advice that it may proceed with a high degree of confidence that future decisions on the matter will
not impair the Group’s ability to operate its hydro assets. A separate claim by the New Zealand Maori Council relating to fresh
water and geothermal resources was lodged in 2012 with the Waitangi Tribunal. The Tribunal concluded that Maori have
residual (but as yet undefined) proprietary rights in fresh water and geothermal resources and it will be for the Government to
determine how any such rights and interests may best be addressed. The impact of this claim on the Group’s operations is
unknown at this time.
From time to time the Group will issue letters of credit and guarantees to various suppliers in the normal course of business.
However, there is no expectation that any outflow of resource relating to these letters of credit or guarantees will be required as
a consequence.
The Group has no other material contingent assets or liabilities.
NOTE 19. SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS
Long-term incentive plan
The Group operates an equity-settled share based long-term incentive (LTI) plan for senior executives. The plan is designed to
enhance the alignment between shareholders and those executives most able to influence the performance of the Group.
Under the plan the senior executives purchase shares at market value funded by an interest free loan from the Group, with the
shares held on trust by the Trustee of the LTI plan until the end of the vesting period. Vesting of shares is dependent on
continued employment through the vesting period and the Group’s relative total shareholder return. If the shares vest,
executives are entitled to a cash amount which, after deduction for tax, is equal to the initial loan balance for the shares which
have vested. That cash amount must be applied towards repayment of their loan balance and the corresponding shares are
released by the trustee to the individual. The vesting periods for the plan are June 2018, June 2019 and June 2020. Under the
plan, a relative total shareholder return measure is used. Performance is measured against a combination of: i) other electricity
generators who are listed on the NZSX; and (ii) all NZX50 companies, both as at the start of the vesting period.
The LTI plan represents the grant of in-substance nil-price options to executives. During the year the Group expensed
$552,990 in relation to equity-settled share based payment transactions (2017: $430,375).
32 // 33
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2018
Movements in the number of share options are as follows:
20182017
Balance at the beginning of the year 668,810 493,912
Options granted 260,118 286,118
Options expired (3,660) (24,468)
Options exercised (179,297) (86,752)
Balance at the end of the year745,971 668,810
199,735 options were exercisable at the end of the year (2017: 182,957) with the remaining options under the plan having a
weighted average life of 1.5 years (2017: 1.6 years).
NOTE 20. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On 15 August 2018, the Company announced it would be partnering with majority shareholder Infratil in a takeover offer for all
shares in Tilt Renewables. If successful, Mercury would retain its 19.99% share in Tilt, and secure the right to appoint a director
to the Board of Tilt. This would result in the investment being reclassified from available for sale to being equity accounted.
The Board of Directors has approved a fully imputed final dividend of 9.1 cents per share to be paid on 28 September 2018.
There are no other material events subsequent to balance date that would affect the fair presentation of these financial
statements.
NOTE 19. SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS (CONTINUED)
GOVERNANCE AT MERCURY
Shareholders
Chief Executive
Executive Management Team
MERCURY PEOPLE
Risk Assurance &
Audit Committee
People & Performance
Committee
Nominations
Committee
MERCURY BOARD
At Mercury, we are focussed on safeguarding our assets and
securing long term value for our shareholders. We are
committed to maintaining the highest standards of corporate
governance and accountability. Mercury’s Board adopts
corporate governance policies and practices that reflect
contemporary standards in New Zealand and Australia,
incorporating the corporate governance recommendations
of the NZX and the ASX.
Our corporate governance practices comply with the ASX
Corporate Governance Principles (third edition) (ASX Principles)
and are in substantial compliance with the NZX Corporate
Governance Code 2017: the only two exceptions relate to
Recommendation 3.3 (Remuneration Committee) and
Recommendation 3.6 (Takeover Protocol). These exceptions
are explained in our full Corporate Governance Statement,
available in the Corporate Governance section of our website
at www.mercury.co.nz.
In this section we give an overview of our Board composition and
experience, how we manage risks, our commitment to acting
ethically and responsibly and our approach to inclusion and
diversity.
Mercury’s Board
Composition and characteristics
The Board currently comprises eight directors: Joan Withers
(Chair), Prue Flacks, Andy Lark, James Miller, Keith Smith, Scott
St John, Patrick Strange and Mike Taitoko. Each of the Directors
is non-executive and independent. Details of our Directors are
available in the Leadership section of our website.
The Board supports the Institute of Directors’ Future Directors
Programme which offers candidates valuable experience sitting
at the Board table of a New Zealand company for 12 or more
months. The programme is designed to increase the pipeline of
board-ready younger directors through giving them exposure to
real-life governance in action along with valuable mentorship.
Our third and current future director, Anna Lissaman,
commenced on 1 July 2018 and her tenure will conclude on
31 December 2019. Anna participates in discussions in all Board
meetings but does not participate in decision-making.
The Board is structured to ensure that as a collective group it has
the skills, experience, knowledge, diversity and perspective to
fulfil its purpose and responsibilities. The responsibilities of the
Board are set out in Mercury’s Board Charter. The Board Charter
is available in the Corporate Governance section of our website.
Our Board characteristics are set out in the diagram on page 34.
Committees
The Board has three standing Committees: the Risk Assurance
& Audit Committee (RAAC), the People & Performance
Committee (formerly the Human Resources Committee)
(PPC), and the Nominations Committee. Each Committee
focusses on specific areas of governance. Together they
strengthen the Board’s oversight of Mercury. As an exception
to Recommendation 3.3 of the NZX Corporate Governance
Code 2017, the Board does not have a separate Remuneration
Committee; rather the functions which would ordinarily be
allocated to that committee are shared between the PPC in
respect of the Chief Executive and the Executive Management
Team (EMT), and the Nominations Committee in respect of the
Directors. The current members of the Committees are as follows:
CommitteeMembers
Risk Assurance &
Audit Committee
Keith Smith (Chair), James Miller and
Patrick Strange. Joan Withers is also a
member by virtue of her position as Board
Chair.
People &
Performance
Committee
Prue Flacks (Chair), Andy Lark, Mike
Taitoko and Scott St John*. Joan Withers
is also a member by virtue of her position
as Board Chair.
Nominations
Committee
Joan Withers (Chair), Prue Flacks and
James Miller.
* Scott St John joined the People & Performance Committee during the reporting
period. His first meeting on this Committee was on 25 June 2018.
GOVERNANCE AT MERCURY
(CONTINUED)
Digitisation/T
echnology
Male
Retail, marketing and brand experience
Governance experience
Large company leadership experience
Electricit
y industr
y operational
experience
Regulato
ry knowledge and experience
Business strategy experience
Innovation and growth,
entrepreneurialis
m
Finance/
Accounting/
Audit Committee
experience
100%
50%
100%
50%
25%
25%
75%
75%
0-3 years
3-6 years
6+ year
s
Female
Human resources, health and
safety experience
Commodit
y or financial
markets trading
Australian Energy Market
experience
Government relationships
Iwi relationships/
connectivit
y
Shareholder/investment
communit
y relationships
S
K
I
L
L
S
T
E
N
U
R
E
D
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
Y
G
E
N
D
E
R
0%
Board Characteristics
Each standing Committee operates in accordance with a written
Charter approved by the Board. The Committee Charters are
available in the Corporate Governance section of our website.
Mercury assesses whether additional committees are required
on a regular basis. During the past financial year, the Board
established two temporary committees for discrete projects.
Skills and reviewing performance
The Nominations Committee has developed a matrix
setting out the ideal mix of skills and diversity of the Board.
The matrix is used to evaluate whether the collective skills and
experience of the Directors meets Mercury’s current and future
requirements. If the Board determines that new or additional
skills are required, training is completed or a formal recruitment
process is undertaken. In addition to having the right mix of
skills, the Board is focused on ensuring that it has the right
culture that takes advantage of, and benefits from, the
diversity of skills, background and experiences of the Board.
The Board fosters a culture of collaborative and open discussion
where each Director as a high performing individual is expected
to make a valuable contribution and to provide an alternative
perspective, even where the topic is outside that Director’s
attributed skills and experience. By applying this philosophy, the
Board as a collective group exceeds the individual contributions
of its members.
Evaluations are regularly conducted to review the performance
of the Board and each Director, and the effectiveness of Board
processes and committees. This is undertaken using a variety of
techniques including external consultants, questionnaires and
Board discussion. The last full Board review, with the assistance
of an external facilitator, was completed in June 2018. The
review found that Mercury’s Board remains in the top tier and
continues to hold many strong attributes identified in 2014 and
2016 reviews, including holding highly relevant board capability
and governance processes. Some opportunities were identified
for Board focus to maintain and extend that performance.
The Board also completed a comprehensive analysis of the skills
and tenure of the Board in mid-2018.
WE ARE COMMITTED
TO MAINTAINING THE
HIGHEST STANDARDS
OF CORPORATE
GOVERNANCE AND
ACCOUNTABILITY.
34 // 35
Primary SkillsSecondary Skills
The table below highlights those skills which the Board considers to be connected with the governance of Mercury’s strategy.
Skill AttributeJoan
Withers
Andy
Lark
James
Miller
Mike
Taitoko
Patrick
Strange
Prue
Flacks
Keith
Smith
Scott
St John
Delivering Customer Advocacy
Digitisation/technology
A detailed understanding of ICT and disruptive
technologies and their potential impact to provide
our customers with choice and freedom
Retail, marketing and brand experience
Senior experience in retail, marketing and brand
development as we seek to positively differentiate
our offering
Leveraging Core Strengths
Governance experience
Commitment to the highest standards of
governance and an ability to assess the
effectiveness of senior management
Large company leadership experience
Sustainable success in business at a senior
executive level
Electricity industry operational experience
Senior executive experience within the electricity
industry together with a deep understanding of
operational excellence
Finance/accounting/audit committee/risk
management experience
Senior executive or board experience in financial
accounting and reporting, corporate finance and
internal controls, and developing and overseeing
an appropriate risk framework and culture
Regulatory knowledge and experience
An understanding of the evolving regulatory
environment in which we operate and the role that
plays in ensuring sustainable custodianship of our
assets and providing benefit to our customers
Human resources, health and safety experience
Familiarity with people and performance issues to
provide an environment for personal and business
growth and an appropriate understanding of
health and safety and wellness concerns
Table continued on next page.
Skill AttributeJoan
Withers
Andy
Lark
James
Miller
Mike
Taitoko
Patrick
Strange
Prue
Flacks
Keith
Smith
Scott
St John
Delivering Sustainable Growth
Business strategy experience
A track record of developing and implementing a
successful and sustainable strategy
Innovation and growth, entrepreneurism
A track record of demonstrated entrepreneurialism
and/or demonstrated understanding and
commitment to innovation and a clear record of
achieving organisational growth
Commodity or financial markets trading
Experience and understanding of commodity and
financial markets
Australian Energy Market experience
Familiarity with the Australian energy market and
the opportunities and challenges of doing
business in that market
Building and maintaining relationships
Government relationships
An understanding of the functioning of
Government and experience developing and
maintaining constructive relationships and
interactions with Government and regulators
Iwi relationships/connectivity
An understanding and appreciation of Maori
culture, the ability to build and foster deep trusting
relationships with iwi and a deep connection with
iwi concerns and aspirations
Shareholder/investment community relationships
Experience in and understanding of shareholder
and investment community concerns and
developing constructive relationships
GOVERNANCE AT MERCURY
(CONTINUED)
Primary SkillsSecondary Skills
36 // 37
Acting Ethically and Responsibly
At Mercury, doing what’s right is something all our people strive
to achieve. We strive to ensure that our people know what the
‘right thing to do’ is. We have put in place the Mercury Code
which establishes our culture and the behaviours we consider
are required for the successful delivery of our strategy and the
achievement of our Purpose of inspiring New Zealanders to
enjoy energy in more wonderful ways. The Mercury Code
requires all Mercury people, including Directors and employees,
to act honestly and with integrity and fairness at all times. The
Mercury Code and associated policy framework underpin our
ethical and behavioural standards. They support our promises to
each other and define our commitment to our customers, our
people and communities, and our investors. The Mercury Code
is available in the Corporate Governance section of our website.
We also want to ensure that we work with suppliers who
share our commitment to acting ethically and doing the
right thing. We have therefore introduced our Supplier Guiding
Principles which describe the way we will work with our suppliers
and what we expect in return. Our Supplier Guiding Principles
set out our commitments to treating people fairly, wellbeing,
protecting our business and our reputation, protection of
personal information and sustainability. Our Supplier Guiding
Principles are available in the Corporate Governance section of
our website.
Managing Risk and Assurance
Risk management is an integral part of Mercury’s business.
Mercury has in place an overarching Risk Management Policy
(available in the Corporate Governance section of our website)
supported by a suite of risk management policies appropriate for
its business which together form our Risk Management
framework.
The purpose of the Risk Management Policy is to embed
a comprehensive, holistic, Group-wide capability in risk
management which provides a consistent method of identifying,
assessing, controlling, monitoring and reporting existing and
potential risks to Mercury’s business and to the achievement of
its plans. The Policy sets out the risk management objectives and
requirements of Mercury within which management is expected
to operate. The Policy is reviewed annually by the RAAC and
approved by the Board.
The Risk Management framework supports a comprehensive
approach to risk, encompassing financial, strategic,
environmental, operational, regulatory, reputational, social and
governance risks. The framework involves actively identifying
and managing risk and taking measures to reduce the likelihood
of risk, contain potential hazards and take mitigating action to
reduce impacts in line with risk tolerances.
Mercury has a Risk Assurance Officer who has the independence
to determine the effectiveness of risk management, assurance
and internal audit. The Risk Assurance Officer has a dual reporting
line to the Chief Financial Officer and the RAAC Chair. The RAAC
tasks the Risk Assurance Officer to ensure healthy and robust
debate and interaction between management, risk assurance
and audit providers.
Mercury operates a Risk Management Committee, comprised
of representatives from the EMT and chaired by the Chief
Executive. Its mandate is to promote risk awareness and
appropriate risk management to all employees, and to monitor
and review risk activities as circumstances and our strategic and
operational objectives change. The Committee meets at least
four times each year.
Mercury must accept some risks in order to achieve its strategic
objectives and to deliver shareholder value. These are embodied in
Mercury’s Risk Appetite Statements which are set and regularly
reviewed by the Board and are set out in more detail in Mercury’s
Corporate Governance Statement, available in the Corporate
Governance section of our website.
The RAAC is responsible for overseeing, reviewing and providing
advice to the Board on Mercury’s risk management policies and
processes. The Risk Assurance Officer reports regularly to the
RAAC on the effectiveness of Mercury’s management of material
business risks. In addition, the RAAC annually reviews the Risk
Management framework. The last review of the Risk Management
framework took place in FY2018. The Auditor–General is the
external auditor of Mercury and each of its subsidiaries (together,
the “Group”), under the Public Audit Act 2001. The Auditor–
General has appointed Simon O’Connor of Ernst & Young to carry
out the FY2018 audit on his behalf.
The NZX Main Board Listing Rules require rotation of the lead
audit partner at least every five years. The next rotation is for the
FY2019 audit. The Auditor–General has appointed Lloyd Bunyan
of Ernst & Young as Mercury’s next lead audit partner. The
provision of external audit services is guided by the Audit
Independence Policy which is available on our website. The
external auditor attends all RAAC meetings and consistent with
the Stakeholder Communications Policy, attends the Annual
Shareholders’ Meeting and is available to shareholders to answer
questions relevant to the audit.
GOVERNANCE AT MERCURY
(CONTINUED)
Inclusion and Diversity
Mercury embraces and celebrates diversity in all its forms. A key
pillar of the Mercury Attitude is that we encourage our people to
share and connect. We believe that the best way to create value
in our business and deliver the best customer experience is
through high performance teams. We aim to make Mercury a
great and safe place to work, where our employees feel engaged
and motivated to live up to their full potential, and also the full
potential of their teams. Being part of a team that celebrates
different backgrounds, views, experience and capability helps
create an inclusive workplace where our people grow and thrive,
leading to better business performance.
Our commitment to inclusion and diversity starts with our
Inclusion and Diversity Policy and framework. Our Policy is
available in the Corporate Governance section of our website.
Mercury’s approach to inclusion and diversity focuses on gender,
age, ethnicity and flexibility. Activity is aligned to the following
principles:
• increasing the diversity of our workforce at senior levels
• creating a flexible and inclusive work environment that
values difference and enhances business outcomes
• harnessing diversity of thought and capitalising on
individual differences
• promoting leadership behaviours that reflect our belief in
the value of inclusion and diversity
• retaining and attracting a talented workforce through
increasing the diversity of the candidate pool and
maintaining a recruitment strategy that is attractive to
all candidates.
Our progress against inclusion and diversity goals is measured
against objectives set by the Board. These objectives are made
up of a mixture of targets and benchmarks. Generally, targets
exist where we believe that achieving diversity in that area is
aided by us working towards a specific measure. In other areas
we use benchmarks where comparison against those identified
data points will help inform our view of how our work towards
diversity in that area is progressing.
38 // 39
Our performance against measurable objectives set by the Board is set out below:
Area of focusObjectiveTargetActual
GenderImprove representation
of women at senior
leadership levels
2020
Employees38%
Leaders33%
EMT33%
Board33%
20172018
Employees41%41%
Leaders30%30%
EMT22%22%
Board29%25%
AgeWork towards an age
profile for our team
that is suitable for our
business taking into
account the population
that we work in
Benchmark against the national
median age of the labour force in the
New Zealand National Labour Force
Projections
Our average age across the workforce is
41, which is consistent with the national median
age of the labour force in the New Zealand
National Labour Force Projections
EthnicityWork towards aligning
the ethnicity of our
team with the
population and
communities that we
work in
Benchmark against National Statistics
(Census data) that show the ethnicity of
the population and communities that
we work in
EthnicityMercury
2018
Ethnicity*
NZ
Population
2013
Census
NZ European (364)45%69%
Maori (32)4%13%
Pacific (55)7%7%
Asian (137)17%9%
Other European (53)7%n/a
Other (77)10%2%
Not selected10%n/a
Ensure that our
leadership reflects the
diversity of our teams
Targeting ethnicity distribution of our
Leader population equal to the ethnicity
distribution of the total company
EthnicityMercury
2018
Ethnicity*
Mercury
People
Leaders by
Ethnicity
NZ European (364)45%62%
Maori (32)4%3%
Pacific (55)7%3%
Asian (137)17%3%
Other European (53)7%5%
Other (77)10%8%
Not selected 10%5%
InclusionEnsure that our team
are supported to do
their best work and
they engage fully as
part of our team
Targeting better performance than the
Average Large Organisation score for
this question of 72%
In response to our 2018 Employee Engagement
Survey, 80% of employees confirmed that they
are treated fairly, regardless of age, ethnicity,
gender or physical capabilities, compared to
2017 All NZ Organisations Benchmark of 78%
FlexibilityFacilitate flexible
workplace
arrangements to
enable employees to
balance responsibilities
appropriately
Targeting better performance than the
Average Large Organisation score for
this question of 80%
In response to our 2018 Employee Engagement
Survey, 85% of employees confirm that they
have the freedom and flexibility to do their job
effectively, compared to 2017 All NZ
Organisations Benchmark of 84%
* Mercury 2018 Ethnicity data based on responses to Mercury’s 2018 Employee Engagement Survey.
At the balance date, the proportion of women on the EMT (including the Chief Executive) was 22%, or two out of nine (as at 30 June
2017 this was 22% or two out of nine). The proportion of women on the Board at balance date was 25% or two out of eight, including
the Chair (as at 30 June 2017 this was 29% or two out of seven).
The Board believes that for this reporting period Mercury has made progress towards achieving its inclusiveness and diversity
objectives and against its Inclusion and Diversity Policy generally. However, the Board notes that continued focus is required over the
next two financial years in order for Mercury to achieve its 2020 gender diversity targets.
DIRECTOR AND EXECUTIVE EMPLOYEE REMUNERATION
Dear Shareholder
As Chair of the People & Performance Committee (PPC)
of the Board, it is my pleasure to present our Remuneration
Report for the year ending 30 June 2018 (FY2018).
This report outlines Mercury’s approach and strategy to
remuneration and in particular for its executives. It sets out
remuneration information for the Chief Executive, direct reports
to the Chief Executive and Directors.
Mercury’s Board is committed to a remuneration
framework that promotes a high performance culture and
aligns executive reward to the achievement of strategies and
objectives to create sustainable value for shareholders.
The Board is committed to demonstrating transparency in
its remuneration policy and practice.
The Board is supported by the PPC for these activities.
The role and membership of the PPC is set out in the Corporate
Governance section.
Mercury’s remuneration approach aims to retain, attract,
develop and motivate high calibre employees at all levels of the
organisation. It is based on a practical set of guiding principles
that provide for consistency, fairness and transparency. This
strategy aligns with Mercury’s strong focus on high performance
teams and growing a human capital advantage, as well as
promoting behaviours and values to support customer centricity
and sustainable growth in shareholder value.
Mercury’s long term incentive (LTI) scheme is currently under
review to determine its continuing effectiveness to motivate,
retain and align the effort of executives, in line with the
company’s priorities. The review of the long term incentive
scheme will also consider the Government’s new taxation rules
for employee share schemes and how this will impact on any
future LTI grants. Any key long term incentive plan changes will
be summarised in next year’s Annual Report.
Finally, I would like to recognise Mercury’s achievement of
winning the Best Enterprise Workplace (750+ employees)
in the 2017 IBM Best Workplaces Awards and also winning the
Workplace Engagement Programme of the Year at the NZ HR
awards. Both awards recognise Mercury’s commitment to its
people and aligning them under one brand purpose: to inspire
New Zealanders to enjoy energy in more wonderful ways.
PRUE FLACKS
CHAIR, PEOPLE & PERFORMANCE COMMITTEE
Executive remuneration
Mercury’s remuneration policy for the Executive Management
Team (EMT) provides the opportunity for them to receive, where
performance has been exceptional, a total remuneration
package in the upper quartile for equivalent market-matched
roles.
The PPC reviews the annual performance appraisal outcomes
for all members of the EMT and approves the outcomes for
all EMT members other than the Chief Executive. The Chief
Executive’s remuneration is approved by the Board on the
recommendation of the PPC. The review takes into account
external benchmarking from PwC to ensure competitiveness
with comparable market peers, along with consideration of an
individual’s performance, skills, expertise and experience.
External benchmarking is commissioned by the PPC from an
expert independent party, PwC, and PwC is required to declare
independence of any management influence in the collation of
the information provided. External benchmarking for non-
Executive remuneration is requested by Mercury management
and provided by Ernst and Young.
Total remuneration is made up of three components: fixed
remuneration, short-term performance incentives and long-term
performance incentives. Short and long-term performance
incentives are deemed ‘at-risk’ because the outcome is
determined by performance against a combination of pre-
determined financial and non-financial objectives.
Fixed remuneration
Fixed remuneration consists of base salary and benefits.
Mercury’s policy is to pay fixed remuneration with reference
to the fixed pay market median.
Short term performance incentives
Short term incentives (STIs) are at-risk payments designed
to motivate and reward for performance typically in that
financial year.
The target value of an STI payment is set annually, usually
as a percentage of the executive’s base salary. For FY2018 the
relevant target percentage for the Chief Executive was 50% and
for all the other executives it was 25% to 35%.
A proportion (80% for the Chief Executive in FY2018, 70% from
FY2019; 50% for other EMT members) of the STI is related to a
shared set of KPIs based on business priorities for the next 12
months, with the objective of aligning the EMT’s focus to the
company’s priorities.
The shared KPIs in FY2018 covered the areas of finance,
customer, wellbeing, people and long-term platform with
respective weightings applied across areas as outlined below.
The financial KPI is normalised for positive and negative annual
variations in hydrology as these are beyond management’s
control. The criteria are selected to closely align with Mercury’s
strategic objectives, purpose and goal and Mercury’s five key
pillars. For FY2019 the weightings have been adjusted as shown.
40 // 41
Target AreaFY2018 Weighting %FY2019 Weighting %Key Pillar
Financial: EBITDAF
1
3030Leading Economic
Performance
People2030
2
High Performance Teams
Wellbeing20
Customer 2020Growing Customer Loyalty
Long term platform10N/AN/A
PartnershipsN/A10Stronger Together
KaitiakitangaN/A10Enhanced Natural Resources
Note 1: EBITDAF is normalised for positive and negative annual variations in Waikato hydro generation.
Note 2: People and Wellbeing have been combined in FY2019 to be People.
For FY2018 there are three performance levels within each
target area, ‘threshold’, ‘on-plan’ and ‘stretch’, except for
long term platform, with 100% of the amount allocated
to that target area being payable when the on-plan level is
achieved. The stretch performance levels allow employees
to be rewarded for exceptional performance. The maximum
amount of a STI payment for an EMT member is 178% of
the STI on-plan amount for that EMT member.
The balance of the STI is related to individual (in the case of
the Chief Executive) or business unit and individual (in the case
of other EMT members) performance measures.
In the event all five performance thresholds are not met,
no STI payment will be made.
Long term performance incentives
LTIs are at-risk payments designed to align the reward of certain
executives with the enhancement of shareholder value over a
multi-year period.
The current LTI plan commenced on 1 July 2015 under
which grants are made annually with performance measured
over a three year period. The face value less tax is used to
determine the number of shares held in trust for each grant and
is set at the date of the grant. The plan’s performance is
measured based on Mercury’s total shareholder return (TSR)
relative to two performance hurdles designed to ensure an
appropriate long term performance comparison.
Each grant under the current LTI plan is divided into two
tranches having different performance hurdles:
• 50% of the grant is based on Mercury’s TSR relative to
the NZX 50 and is subject to a gate that Mercury’s TSR
over that period must be at least positive;
• 50% of the grant is based on Mercury’s TSR relative
to the performance of an industry peer group (comprising
Meridian Energy, Genesis Energy, Contact Energy and
Trustpower). There is no positive TSR performance gate
on this tranche but Mercury’s TSR must be at the 50th
percentile of the comparator group for any award to be
made on this component of the LTI plan.
For the FY2018 grant commencing 1 July 2017 the value
represents between 27% - 35% of an executive’s base salary.
LTI payments are made in shares rather than cash.
The maximum number of shares which an executive may
receive for each grant is determined by dividing the value of
the grant less tax by the market value of one Mercury share as
at the date of the grant.
The Board retains discretion over the final outcome, to allow
appropriate adjustments where unanticipated circumstances
may impact performance, positively or negatively, over a three
year period.
Chief Executive remuneration
Chief Executive remuneration (FY2018 and FY2017)
Salary $Benefits
1
$Subtotal $Pay for performance $
Total
remuneration
$
STILT ISubtotal
FY20181,108,655*62,1001,170,755632,5280632,5281,803,283
FY20171,058,779*50,4551,109,234575,960195,998771,9581,881,192
*Actual salary paid includes holiday pay paid as per NZ legislation. The base salary for FY2018 was $1,054,212.50 and for FY2017 $1,028,500.
Five year summary – Chief Executive remuneration
Total
remuneration
paid
2
$
Percentage STI
against maximum
4
%
Percentage
vested LTI against
maximum %
Span of LTI
performance
period
Chief Executive –
Fraser WhinerayFY20181,803,2836702015 – 2018
FY20171,881,19263982014 – 2017
FY20161,501,43457782013 – 2016
FY20151,427,932471002013 – 2015
Chief Executive –
Doug HeffernanFY20151,985,791871002011 – 2014
3
FY20141,302,754
3
N/A
3
N/A
3
2011 – 2014
3
Explanation of above items
Note 1: Benefits include KiwiSaver, insurance and carpark.
Note 2: Total remuneration paid including Salary, Benefits, STI and LTI payments.
Note 3: LTI and STI payments for FY2014 are included in the FY2015 year as schemes ended 31 August 2014.
Note 4: Maximum STI is 178% of ‘on-plan’ performance pay.
Breakdown of Chief Executive pay for performance (FY2018)
DescriptionPerformance measures
Percentage
achieved %
STI
1
Set at 50% of base salary. Based on a
combination of key financial and
non-financial performance measures.
80% based on the five Company Shared KPIs (see table
above for weightings).
117.5
20% based on individual measures.130
LT I
1
Shares issued and rewarded under the
long term incentive scheme. Shares
issued 1 July 2015 at $200,000 gross.
50% weighting relative TSR performance against NZX 50
(fixed at date of grant) with 50% vesting at 50th percentile
and 100% at 75th percentile; pro rata vesting in between.
0
50% weighting relative TSR performance against industry
peer group (comprising Meridian Energy, Genesis Energy,
Contact Energy and Trustpower) with 50% vesting at 50th
percentile and 100% at 75th percentile; pro rata vesting in
between.
Note 1: The above STI and LTI payments for FY2018 were paid in FY2019.
DIRECTOR AND EXECUTIVE EMPLOYEE REMUNERATION (CONTINUED)
42 // 43
Five year summary – TSR Performance (company vs peer)
MERCURY
PEER
NZX 50
TSR %
30 June 2014
30 June 201530 June 201730 June 201830 June 2016
40
30
20
10
5
35
25
15
0
KiwiSaver
The Chief Executive is a member of KiwiSaver. As a member of this scheme, the Chief Executive is eligible to contribute and receive
a matching company contribution of 3% of gross taxable earnings (including short and long term incentives). For FY2018 the
Company’s contribution was $56,418.
FY2019 Chief Executive remuneration structure
The Board has elected, in the interests of transparency, to disclose in advance the structure and package that will apply for FY2019.
FY2019Base Salary $Benefits
1
$Subtotal $Pay for performance “on-plan” $Total remuneration $
STILTI granted
2
Subtotal
Chief Executive1,054,21237,3081,091,521527,106421,685948,7912,040,312
Note 1: Benefits include KiwiSaver, insurance and carpark.
Note 2: This LTI is granted in FY2019 and if hurdles are met, paid in shares in 2021. The LTI tranche which has the potential to vest in FY2019 is $359,975 and dates from
FY2017-FY2019.
Chief Executive remuneration performance pay for FY2019
LONG TERM INCENTIVES
GRANTED (2021 VESTING)
ANNUAL VARIABLE
BASE SALARY & BENEFITS
$000
Fixed
On-planMaximum
2,500
1,500
500
2,000
1,000
0
Chief Financial Officer remuneration
In the interests of providing greater transparency of executive remuneration, the Board has elected to provide details regarding
total remuneration paid to the Chief Financial Officer.
In FY2018, the Chief Financial Officer received remuneration totalling $823,978. This amount included a $170,165 STI payment and
$137,196 LTI payment for FY2017 paid in FY2018, with the remaining $516,617 being a combination of fixed remuneration and benefits.
Share ownership
The Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer’s ownership of shares as at 30 June 2018 are:
Executive
Number of shares owned (excludes
shares held in Trust for the LTI scheme)
Change in shares owned
from 30 June 2017
Chief Executive233,351
1
54,085
Chief Financial Officer245,4753 7, 8 5 9
Balance of EMT
2
152,30587,353
Note1: The Chief Executive’s shares are held in family trust.
Note2: Balance of shares owned by other EMT members and excludes shares owned by Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer.
Employee remuneration
The Group paid remuneration in excess of $100,000 including
benefits to 363 employees (not including directors) during the
FY2018 year in the following bands:
Remuneration BandCurrently
employed
No longer
employed
To t a l
$100,001-$110,00058361
$110,001-$120,00063871
$120,001-$130,00042244
$130,001-$140,00041142
$140,001-$150,0003939
$150,001-$160,0002323
$160,001-$170,0001717
$170,001-$180,0001010
$180,001-$190,00099
$190,001-$200,0001111
$200,001-$210,00077
$210,001-$220,00088
$220,001-$230,000112
$230,001-$240,00022
$240,001-$250,00033
$250,001-$260,00011
$260,001-$270,00055
$270,001-$280,00066
$280,001-$290,00011
$290,001-$300,00022
$310,001-$320,00033
$320,001-$330,00022
$490,001-$500,00011
$500,001-$510,00011
$550,001-$560,00022
$590,001-$600,00011
$660,001-$670,00011
$670,001-$680,00011
$820,001-$830,00011
$1,940,001-$1,950,00011
Total36315378
Note: The remuneration bands above include 3 employees who
received redundancy payments in FY2018.
The total remuneration ratio for FY2018 between Employee (median)
and Chief Executive was 1:28. The ratio of Employee (median)
remuneration and Chief Executive base salary was 1:15. Note: These
ratios are based on actual remuneration paid in FY2018.
DIRECTOR AND EXECUTIVE EMPLOYEE REMUNERATION (CONTINUED)
44 // 45
Directors’ remuneration
The directors’ remuneration is paid in the form of directors’ fees. Additional fees are paid to the Chair and in respect of work carried
out by directors on various Board committees to reflect the additional time involved and responsibilities of these positions.
The total pool of fees able to be paid to directors is subject to shareholder approval and currently stands at $991,000. Mercury meets
directors’ reasonable travel and other costs associated with Mercury business. The following people held office as directors during the
year to 30 June 2018 and received the following remuneration during the period. The number of meetings and attendance rate by
director during the year to 30 June 2018 was as follows:
DirectorBoard
Risk Assurance
& Audit Committee
People &
Performance
Committee
Nominations
CommitteeOther
1
To t a l
2
No. of meetings1244323
Fees $
Meetings
Attended Fees $
Meetings
Attended Fees $
Meetings
Attended Fees $
Meetings
Attended FeesFees $
Joan Withers
(Chair)
180,000
(Chair)
3
1244 (Chair)3180,000
Prue Flacks98,00012
20,000
(Chair)44,00032,750124,750
Andrew Lark98,000128,0004106,000
James Miller98,0001210,00044,00035,500117,500
Keith Smith98,00011
26,000
(Chair)4124,000
Patrick Strange98,0001210,00042,750110,750
Mike Taitoko98,000128,0004106,000
Scott St John
4
81,66710–12,75084,417
To t a l849,66746,00036,0008,00013,750953,417
Note 1: Two temporary committees were established during the reporting period. The fees listed in this column are aggregate fees. James Miller participated in both committees.
Note 2: Disclosure Committee is not reported on as these occur as adhoc and on an as required basis.
Note 3: Joan Withers’ fees cover attendance at all Committee meetings.
Note 4: Scott St John was appointed director effective from 1 September 2017 and his first meeting on the People & Performance Committee was on 25 June 2018.
Scott’s attendance rates are based on attendance at meetings during his directorship and appointment to the Committee only. Scott’s fee of $667 for June
attendance at the People & Performance Committee was paid after the end of the reporting period.
Note 5: Future Director Nicky Ashton was paid $10,000 in FY2018.
DIRECTORS’ DISCLOSURES
Interests Register
Disclosure of Directors’ Interests
Section 140(1) of the New Zealand Companies Act 1993 requires a director of a company to disclose certain interests. Under
subsection (2) a director can make disclosure by giving a general notice in writing to the Company of a position held by a director in
another named company or entity. The following are particulars included in the Company’s Interests Register as at 30 June 2018:
Joan Withers
The Warehouse Group LimitedChair
ANZ Bank New Zealand LimitedDirector
The Louise Perkins Foundation
(Sweet Louise)
Trustee
Pure Advantage
2
Trustee
Economic Development Challenge GroupMember
On Being Bold LimitedDirector
Auckland Mayoral Advisory Group
1
Member
Prue Flacks
Bank of New Zealand LimitedDirector
Planboe LimitedDirector
Chorus LimitedDirector
Queenstown Airport Corporation Limited
1
Chair
Andy Lark
SLI Systems LimitedDirector
Group LarkChair
Simple
2
Director and
Interim Chair
Foxtel Limited
1
Chief Marketing and
Digital Officer
James Miller
NZX LimitedChair/Shareholder
ACCDirector
Auckland International Airport LimitedDirector/Shareholder
St Cuthbert’s College Trust BoardTrustee
Keith Smith
Healthcare Holdings Ltd and
subsidiaries and associates
Chair
Enterprise Motor Group Ltd and
subsidiaries
Chair
Mobile Surgical Services Limited and
subsidiaries
Chair
Goodman (NZ) Limited and subsidiariesChair
The Warehouse Group Limited and
subsidiaries
Deputy Chair
H J Asmuss & Co LimitedChair
Community Financial Services LimitedDirector
Electronic Navigation Limited
and subsidiaries
Director
K One W One Limited and subsidiaries
2
Director
Westland Dairy Cooperative LimitedDirector
Harpers Gold Limited and subsidiariesDirector/Shareholder
James Raymond Holdings Limited
(private family investment company)
Director/Shareholder
Gwendoline Holdings Limited
(private family investment company)
Director/Shareholder
Tilt Renewables LimitedShareholder
Cornwall Park Trust BoardTrustee
Sir John Logan Campbell
Residuary Estate
Trustee
The Selwyn TrustTrustee
Advisory board of Tax Traders Limited
(formerly The New Zealand Tax Trading
Company)
Member
Anderson & O’Leary LimitedChair
The Warehouse Financial
Services Limited
2
Director
Tree Scape LimitedDirector
Scott St John
Fisher & Paykel Healthcare Corporation
Limited
1
Director
Fonterra Cooperative Group Limited
(and Fonterra Shareholders Fund)
1
Director
Next Foundation (and associated
entities)
1
Director
Te Awanga Terraces Limited
1
Director
First NZ Capital Holdings Limited
1
Director
University of Auckland
1
Chancellor
Butland Medical Foundation
1
Trustee
Patrick Strange
Chorus LimitedChair
Essential Energy, NSWDirector
NZX LimitedDirector
New Zealand Clearing and Depository
Corporation Limited
2
Director
Auckland International Airport LimitedDirector
Waitahoata Farms LimitedDirector
Mike Taitoko
Waiora Consulting LimitedDirector/Shareholder
Takiwa Health Limited
2
Director
Takiwa Limited (formerly Waiora
Pacific Limited)
Director/Shareholder
Cognition Education Limited
2
Director
Committee for Auckland Limited
2
Director
Bioresource Processing AllianceDirector
Auckland Tourism Events and Economic
Development Limited (ATEED)
Director
Maratini Holdings LimitedDirector/Shareholder
Canvasland Holdings LimitedDirector/Shareholder
Digital Economy and Digital Inclusion
Ministerial Advisory Group
1
Member
1 Entries added by notices given by the directors during the year ended
30 June 2018
2 Entries removed by notices given by the directors during the year ended
30 June 2018
46 // 47
Directors’ and Officers’ Indemnities
Indemnities have been given to, and insurance has been effected for, directors and senior managers of the Group to cover acts or
omissions of those persons in carrying out their duties and responsibilities as directors and senior managers.
Disclosure of Directors’ Interests in Share Transactions
Directors disclosed, pursuant to section 148 of the New Zealand Companies Act 1993, the following acquisitions and disposals of
relevant interests in Shares during the period to 30 June 2018:
Name of director
Date of
acquisition/disposal
of relevant interest
Nature of
relevant interest
Consideration
NZD
Shares in which a
relevant interest was
acquired/(disposed)
Scott St John4 September 2017On market purchase of shares17,199.005,000
Scott St John28 February 2018On market purchase of shares5,383.841,672
Scott St John28 February 2018Off market purchase of shares10,716.163,328
Scott St John28 May 2018On market acquisition of shares9,600.003,000
Disclosure of Directors’ Interests in Mercury’s Securities
Directors disclosed the following relevant interests in
Mercury’s securities as at 30 June 2018:
DirectorNumber of SharesNumber of Bonds
Joan Withers39,900–
Prue Flacks23,47440,000
Andy Lark3,300–
James Miller40,320–
Keith Smith2 7, 8 6 8–
Scott St John 13,000–
Patrick Strange14,1608,600
Mike Taitoko2,200–
SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION
Twenty largest registered shareholders as at 30 June 2018
Name
Number
of shares
% of shares
1
Her Majesty The Queen In Right Of New Zealand 716,140,52851.15
New Zealand Central Securities Depository Limited 287,402,52520.52
Mercury NZ Limited 37,988,5852.71
HSBC Custody Nominees (Australia) Limited 17,384,8381.24
Forsyth Barr Custodians Limited12,001,8010.85
Custodial Services Limited 8,198,7150.58
FNZ Custodians Limited 7,132,1670.50
JBWere (NZ) Nominees Limited6,759,5780.48
New Zealand Depository Nominee Limited6,128,4200.43
Citicorp Nominees Pty Limited 4,867,5890.34
Custodial Services Limited 4,237,4550.30
Custodial Services Limited 3,769,9440.26
Investment Custodial Services Limited3,418,1790.24
JP Morgan Nominees Australia Limited 3,085,6770.22
Custodial Services Limited2,565,7820.18
Richard Wallace Shapero 2,015,0000.14
National Nominees Limited 1,520,2290.10
Deutsche Securities Australia Limited 1,442,7300.10
Custodial Services Limited1,205,6690.08
Forsyth Barr Custodians Limited910,9280.06
Total1,128,176,33980.48
1. Percentage calculated on the basis of Mercury having 1,400,012,517 ordinary shares on issue as at 30 June 2018, which included 37,988,585 ordinary shares held as
treasury shares.
New Zealand Central Securities Depository Limited (NZCSD) provides a custodian depository service that allows electronic trading of
securities to its members and does not have a beneficial interest in these shares. As at 30 June 2018, the largest shareholdings in the
Company held through NZCSD were:
Shareholder
Number
of shares
% of NZCSD
holding
% of total
Mercury shares
1
HSBC Nominees (New Zealand) Limited 97,030,98233.766.93
Citibank Nominees (New Zealand) Limited 39,770,85513.842.84
HSBC Nominees (New Zealand) Limited A/C State Street33,517,86811.662.39
JPMorgan Chase Bank NA NZ Branch-Segregated Clients Acct25,291,1008.801.81
Accident Compensation Corporation24,879,4198.661.78
HSBC Nominees A/C NZ Superannuation Fund Nominees Limited15,642,0625.441.12
National Nominees New Zealand Limited 12,516,8034.360.89
BNP Paribas Nominees (NZ) Limited 8,576,4322.980.61
BNP Paribas Nominees (NZ) Limited 6,939,3672.410.50
ANZ Wholesale Australasian Share Fund 4,040,9531.410.29
1. Percentage calculated on the basis of Mercury having 1,400,012,517 ordinary shares on issue as at 30 June 2018, which included 37,988,585 ordinary shares held as
treasury shares.
48 // 49
Substantial product holders of the Company as at 30 June 2018
Class of
securities
Number of
securities in
substantial
holding
Total number
of securities
in class
Her Majesty The Queen in Right of New ZealandOrdinary shares731,850,590
1
1,400,012,517
2
1. This comprises (a) 716,140, 528 shares held by the Crown on its own account; (b) 15,642,062 shares forming part of the New Zealand Superannuation Fund which are
the property of the Crown; and (c) $68,000 shares held by Public Trust on trust for the Crown and certain iwi.
2. As at 30 June 2018, Mercury had 1,400,012,517 ordinary shares on issue, which included 37,988,585 ordinary shares held as treasury shares.
Distribution of shareholders and holdings as at 30 June 2018
Size of holding
Number of
shareholders%
Number of
shares
Holding
quantity %
1 to 1,00030,82636.6121,530,8531.54
1,001 to 5,00042,30250.2498,601,7997. 0 4
5,001 to 10,0007,1 2 68.4652,381,3853.74
10,001 to 100,0003,8454.5778,564,7525.61
100,001 and above 1060.131,148,933,72882.07
Total84,2051001,400,012,517100
Distribution of bondholders and holdings as at 30 June 2018
Size of holding
Number of
bondholders%
Number of
capital bonds
Holding
quantity %
1,001 to 5,0003659.921,819,0000.61
5,001 to 10,00078921.457,538,0002.51
10,001 to 100,0002,3546484,066,00028.02
100,001 and above 1704.62206,577,00068.86
Total3,678100300,000,000100
COMPANY DISCLOSURES
Stock Exchange Listings
Mercury NZ Limited is listed on both the New Zealand and
Australian stock exchanges.
In New Zealand, the Company is listed with a “non-standard”
(NS) designation. This is due to particular provisions of the
Constitution, including the requirements regulating ownership
and transfer of Ordinary Shares.
ASX approved a change in Mercury NZ Limited’s ASX admission
category from an ASX Listing to an ASX Foreign Exempt Listing,
effective from the commencement of trading on 19 February
2016.
The Company continues to have a full listing on the NZX Main
Board, and the Company’s shares are still listed on the ASX. The
Company is primarily regulated by the NZX, complies with the
NZX Listing Rules, and is exempt from complying with most of
the ASX Listing Rules (based on the principle of substituted
compliance).
Mercury NZ Limited
The following persons held office as Directors of Mercury NZ
Limited as at the end of the 2017/2018 financial year, being
30 June 2018: Joan Withers, Prue Flacks, James Miller, Mike
Taitoko, Keith Smith, Patrick Strange, Andy Lark and Scott
St John. Scott St John was appointed as a Director on
1 September 2017 and was elected as a Director by shareholders
on 7 November 2017.
Subsidiary Companies
The following persons held office as directors of subsidiaries of
Mercury NZ Limited during FY2018:
Company nameDirectors
Bosco Connect LimitedFraser Whineray
William Meek
Tony Nagel
Glo-Bug LimitedFraser Whineray
William Meek
Tony Nagel
Kawerau Geothermal LimitedFraser Whineray
William Meek
Tony Nagel
Mercury Energy LimitedFraser Whineray
William Meek
Tony Nagel
Metrix LimitedFraser Whineray
William Meek
Tony Nagel
Mighty Geothermal Power International
Limited
Fraser Whineray
William Meek
Tony Nagel
Mighty Geothermal Power LimitedFraser Whineray
William Meek
Tony Nagel
Company nameDirectors
Mercury ESPP LimitedWilliam Meek
Tony Nagel
Marlene Strawson
Mercury Geothermal LimitedFraser Whineray
William Meek
Tony Nagel
Mercury LTI LimitedPrue Flacks
Mike Taitoko
Howard Thomas
Ngatamariki Geothermal LimitedFraser Whineray
William Meek
Tony Nagel
Rotokawa Generation LimitedWilliam Meek
Nicholas Clarke
Michael Stevens
Rotokawa Geothermal LimitedFraser Whineray
William Meek
Tony Nagel
Michael Stevens
Rotokawa Joint Venture Limited (50%)Aroha Campbell
Kevin McLoughlin
3
William Meek
3
Nicholas Clarke
Mana Newton
2
Mark Thompson
Michael Stevens
Natasha Strong
2
Special General Partner LimitedFraser Whineray
William Meek
Tony Nagel
Mighty River Power LimitedFraser Whineray
William Meek
Tony Nagel
Blockchain Energy LimitedFraser Whineray
William Meek
Tony Nagel
MRP NRI-Chile Holdings Limited
1
Samuel Moore
John Carbone
Nikolai de Giorgio
MRP NRI-Peru Holdings Limited
1
Samuel Moore
John Carbone
Nikolai de Giorgio
MRP NRI-Germany Holdings Limited
1
Samuel Moore
John Carbone
Nikolai de Giorgio
Mercury Solar LimitedFraser Whineray
William Meek
Tony Nagel
What Power Crisis (2016) LimitedFraser Whineray
William Meek
Tony Nagel
1 Company dissolved during FY2018
2 Directors who have been appointed during FY2018
3 Directors who have resigned during FY2018
50 // 51
OTHER DISCLOSURES
Waivers from the New Zealand and Australian
Stock Exchanges
ASX
ASX has granted waivers in respect of the ASX Listing Rules to
allow the Constitution to contain provisions reflecting the
ownership restrictions imposed by the Public Finance Act and to
allow the Crown to cancel the sale of shares to applicants who
acquire shares under the General Offer and are not New Zealand
Applicants.
The majority of the waivers that ASX previously granted to the
Company are no longer relevant following the change to the
Company’s admission category to an ASX Foreign Exempt
Listing. The waivers from ASX Listing Rules 8.10 and 8.11
continue to apply. These waivers permit the Constitution to
contain provisions:
• allowing the Crown and the Company to enforce the 10%
limit; and
• enabling the Company to prevent shareholders who
acquired shares under the General Offer and are not New
Zealand applicants from transferring those shares and to
enable the Company to sell those shares.
Information about Mercury NZ Limited Ordinary Shares
This statement sets out information about the rights, privileges,
conditions and limitations, including restrictions on transfer, that
attach to shares in the Company.
Rights and privileges
Under the Constitution and the Companies Act 1993
(“Companies Act”), each share gives the holder a right to:
• attend and vote at a meeting of shareholders, including the
right to cast one vote per share on a poll on any resolution,
such as a resolution to:
– appoint or remove a director;
– adopt, revoke or alter the Constitution;
– approve a major transaction (as that term is defined in
the Companies Act);
– approve the amalgamation of the Company under
section 221 of the Companies Act; or
– place the Company in liquidation;
• receive an equal share in any distribution, including
dividends, if any, authorised by the Board and declared and
paid by the Company in respect of that share;
• receive an equal share with other shareholders in the
distribution of surplus assets in any liquidation of the
Company;
• be sent certain information, including notices of meeting
and Company reports sent to shareholders generally; and
• exercise the other rights conferred upon a shareholder by
the Companies Act and the Constitution.
Restrictions on ownership and transfer
The Public Finance Act 1989 (“Public Finance Act”) includes
restrictions on the ownership of certain types of securities issued
by the Company and consequences for breaching those
restrictions. The Constitution incorporates these restrictions and
mechanisms for monitoring and enforcing them.
A summary of the restrictions on the ownership of shares under
the Public Finance Act and the Constitution is set out below. If
the Company issues any other class of shares, or other securities
which confer voting rights, in the future, the restrictions
summarised below would also apply to those other classes of
shares or voting securities.
51% Holding
The Crown must hold at least 51% of the shares on issue.
The Company must not issue, acquire or redeem any shares if
such issue, acquisition or redemption would result in the Crown
falling below this 51% holding.
10% Limit
No person (other than the Crown) may have a ‘relevant interest’
in more than 10% of the shares on issue (“10% Limit”).
The Company must not issue, acquire or redeem any shares if it
has actual knowledge that such issue, acquisition or redemption
will result in any person other than the Crown exceeding the
10% Limit.
Ascertaining whether a breach has occurred
If a holder of shares breaches the 10% Limit or knows or
believes that a person who has a relevant interest in shares held
by that holder may have a relevant interest in shares in breach
of the 10% Limit, the holder must notify the Company of the
breach or potential breach.
The Company may require a holder of shares to provide it with a
statutory declaration if the Board knows or believes that a
person is, or is likely to be, in breach of the 10% Limit. That
statutory declaration is required to include, where applicable,
details of all persons who have a relevant interest in any shares
held by that holder.
Determining whether a breach has occurred
The Company has the power to determine whether a breach of
the 10% Limit has occurred and, if so, to enforce the 10% Limit.
In broad terms, if:
• the Company considers that a person may be in breach of
the 10% Limit; or
• a holder of shares fails to lodge a statutory declaration when
required to do so or lodges a declaration that has not been
completed to the reasonable satisfaction of the Company,
then the Company is required to determine whether or not the
10% Limit has been breached and, if so, whether or not that
breach was inadvertent. The Company must give the affected
shareholder the opportunity to make representations to the
Company before it makes a determination on these matters.
Effect of exceeding the 10% Limit
A person who is in breach of the 10% Limit must:
• comply with any notice received from the Company
requiring them to dispose of shares or their relevant interest
in shares, or take any other steps that are specified in the
notice, for the purpose of remedying the breach; and
• ensure that they are no longer in breach within 60 days
after the date on which they became aware, or ought to
have been aware, of the breach. If the breach is not
remedied within that timeframe, the Company may arrange
for the sale of the relevant number of shares on behalf of
the relevant holder. In those circumstances, the Company
will pay the net proceeds of sale, after the deduction of any
other costs incurred by the Company in connection with the
sale (including brokerage and the costs of investigating the
breach of the 10% Limit), to the relevant holder as soon as
practicable after the sale has been completed.
If a relevant interest is held in any shares in breach of the
10% Limit then, for so long as that breach continues:
• no votes may be cast in respect of any of the shares in
which a relevant interest is held in excess of the 10% Limit;
and
• the registered holder(s) of shares in which a relevant interest
is held in breach of the 10% Limit will not be entitled to
receive, in respect of the shares in which a relevant interest
is held in excess of the 10% Limit, any dividend or other
distribution authorised by the Board in respect of the shares.
However, if the Board determines that a breach of the 10% Limit
was not inadvertent, or that it does not have sufficient
information to determine that the breach was not inadvertent,
the registered holder may not exercise the votes attached to,
and will not be entitled to receive any dividends or other
distributions in respect of, any of its shares.
An exercise of a voting right attached to a share held in breach
of the 10% Limit must be disregarded in counting the votes
concerned. However, a resolution passed at a meeting is not
invalid where votes exercised in breach of the voting restriction
were counted by the Company in good faith and without
knowledge of the breach.
The Board may refuse to register a transfer of shares if it knows
or believes that the transfer will result in a breach of the 10%
Limit or where the transferee has failed to lodge a statutory
declaration requested from it by the Board within the prescribed
timeframe.
Crown directions
The Crown has the power to direct the Board to exercise certain
of the powers conferred on it under the Constitution (for
example, where the Crown suspects that the 10% Limit has
been breached but the Board has not taken steps to investigate
the suspected breach).
Trustee corporations and nominee companies
Trustee corporations and nominee companies (that hold
securities on behalf of a large number of separate underlying
beneficial holders) are exempt from the 10% Limit provided that
certain conditions are satisfied.
Share Cancellation
In certain circumstances, shares could be cancelled by the
Company through a reduction of capital, share buy back or
other form of capital reconstruction approved by the Board and,
where applicable, the shareholders.
Sale of less than a Minimum Holding
The Company may at any time give notice to a shareholder
holding less than a Minimum Holding of shares (as that term is
defined in the NZX Main Board Listing Rules) that if, at the end
of 3 months after the date the notice is given, shares then
registered in the name of the holder are less than a Minimum
Holding, the Company may sell those shares through the NZX
Main Board or in some other manner approved by NZX Limited,
and the holder is deemed to have authorised the Company to
act on behalf of the holder and to sign all necessary documents
relating to the sale.
For the purposes of the sale and of Rule 5.12 of the ASX
Settlement Operating Rules, where the Company has given a
notice that complies with Rule 5.12.2 of the ASX Settlement
Operating Rules, the Company may, after the end of the time
specified in the notice, initiate a Holding Adjustment to move
the relevant shares from that CHESS Holding to an Issuer
Sponsored Holding (as those terms are defined in the ASX
Settlement Operating Rules) or to take any other action the
Company considers necessary or desirable to effect the sale.
The proceeds of the sale of any shares sold for being less than
a Minimum Holding will be applied as follows:
• first, in payment of any reasonable sale expenses.
• second, in satisfaction of any unpaid calls or any other
amounts owing to the Company in respect of the shares.
• the residue, if any, must be paid to the person who was the
holder immediately before the sale or his or her executors,
administrators or assigns.
OTHER DISCLOSURES
(CONTINUED)
52 // 53
Cancellation of sale of shares
The Crown may cancel the sale of shares to an applicant under
the offer of shares by the Crown (the Offer) in the Mighty River
Power Share Offer Investment Statement and Prospectus if the
applicant misrepresented its entitlement to be allocated shares
under the Offer as a ‘New Zealand Applicant’ (as that term is
defined in the Share Offer Investment Statement and
Prospectus). If the Crown cancels a sale of shares on those
grounds:
• the Company must sell shares held by that applicant, up to
the number of shares sold to it under the Offer, irrespective
of whether or not those shares were acquired by the
applicant under the Offer (unless the applicant had
previously sold, transferred or disposed of all of its shares
to a person who was not an associated person of the
applicant); and
• the applicant will receive from the sale the lesser of:
– the sale price for the shares less the costs incurred by
the Crown and the Company; and
– the aggregate price paid for the shares less those costs,
with any excess amount being payable to the Crown.
If an applicant who misrepresented their entitlement to shares
has sold, transferred or otherwise disposed of shares to an
associated person, then the power of sale will extend to shares
held by that associated person, up to the number of shares
transferred, sold or otherwise disposed of to the associated
person by the relevant applicant.
Donations
Donations of $203,069 were made by the Group during the
year ended 30 June 2018 ($126,090 during the year ended
30 June 2017). Under Mercury’s Delegation Policy, donations
to political parties are prohibited.
Other Disclosures
Mercury NZ Limited is incorporated in New Zealand and is not
subject to Chapters 6, 6A, 6B and 6C of the Corporations Act
2001 (Australia). Mercury will not acquire any classified assets in
circumstances in which the ASX Listing Rules would require the
issue of restricted securities, without the written consent of ASX.
On 21 August 2018 the Board declared a fully imputed final
dividend of 9.1 cents per share to all shareholders who are on
the Company’s share register at 5.00pm on the record date
of 13 September 2018. The dividends will be imputed at a
corporate tax rate of 28% which amounts to an imputation
credit of $3.54 cents per share for the final dividend. The
Company will also pay a supplementary dividend of 1.61 cents
per share relating to the final dividend to non-resident
shareholders. The Company will receive from the New Zealand
Inland Revenue Department a tax credit equivalent to
supplementary dividends.
These dividends together with the interim dividend of
$82.6 million (6.0 cents per share) paid to shareholders on
3 April 2018 brings total declared dividends to $206.6 million
(or 15.1 cents per share).
As at the date of this annual report, the Company has a S&P’s
BBB+ rating with a stable outlook. The Company benefits from a
one notch uplift due to the Crown’s majority ownership.
The Company’s Net Tangible Assets per Share (excluding
treasury stock) as at 30 June 2018 was $2.34, compared
with $2.34 at 30 June 2017.
SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION
GLOSSARY
Shareholder enquiries
Changes in address, dividend payment details and
investment portfolios can be viewed and updated online:
www.investorcentre.com/nz. You will need your CSN and FIN
numbers to access this service.
Enquiries may be addressed to the Share Registrar
(see Directory for contact details).
Investor information
Our website at www.mercury.co.nz is an excellent source of
information about what’s happening within the company.
Our Investor Centre allows you to view all regular investor
communications, information on our latest operating and
financial results, dividend payments, news and share price history.
Electronic shareholder communication
It is quick and easy to make the change to receiving your reports
electronically. This can be done either:
• Online at www.investorcentre.com/nz by using your CSN
and FIN numbers (when you log in for the first time). Select
‘View Portfolio’ and log in. Then select ‘Update My Details’
and select ‘Communication Options’; or
• By contacting Computershare Investor Services Limited by
email, fax or post.
Free Cash FlowIs net cash flow from operating
activities less stay-in-business capital
expenditure
Generation-
weighted Average
Price (GWAP)
Generation Weighted Average Price of
electricity generated and sold to the
wholesale electricity market
GWhGigawatt hour. One gigawatt hour is
equal to one million kilowatt hours
Load-weighted
Average Price
(LWAP)
Load Weighted Average Price of
electricity purchased from the
wholesale electricity market
Lost-time Injury
Frequency Rate
(LTIFR)
A measure of the number of injuries
resulting in lost time per 200,000
hours worked, including employees
and on-site contractors
MWhMegawatt hour. One megawatt hour is
equal to 1,000 kilowatt hours. A
megawatt hour is the metering
standard unit for the wholesale
market
Smart metersAdvanced electricity meters that are a
replacement for analogue meters, and
send electronic meter readings to
your energy retailer automatically
Spot market/
wholesale market
The buying and selling of wholesale
electricity is done via a ‘pool’, where
electricity generators offer electricity
to the market and retailers bid to buy
the electricity. This market is called
the spot or physical wholesale market
Total Recordable
Injury Frequency
Rate (TRIFR)
A record of the number of reported
medical treatment, restricted work,
lost time and serious harm injuries
per 200,000 hours, including
employees and on-site contractors
54 // 55
DIRECTORY
Board of Directors
Joan Withers, Chair
Prue Flacks
Andy Lark
James Miller
Keith Smith
Scott St John
Patrick Strange
Mike Taitoko
Executive Team
Fraser Whineray,
Chief Executive
Kevin Angland,
General Manager Digital Services
Nick Clarke,
General Manager Geothermal & Safety
Phil Gibson,
General Manager Hydro & Wholesale
Julia Jack,
Chief Marketing Officer
William Meek,
Chief Financial Officer
Tony Nagel,
General Manager Corporate Affairs
Matthew Olde,
Metrix Chief Executive
Marlene Strawson,
General Manager People & Performance
Company Secretary
Howard Thomas
Investor Relations & Sustainability Enquiries
Tim Thompson
Head of Treasury & Investor Relations
Mercury NZ Limited
P O Box 90399
Auckland 1142
New Zealand
Phone: +64 27 517 3470
Email: investor@mercury.co.nz
Registered Office in New Zealand
Level 3, 109 Carlton Gore Road, Auckland 1023
Registered Office in Australia
c/– TMF Corporate Services
(Australia) Pty Limited
Level 16, 201 Elizabeth Street
Sydney NSW 2000
Phone: +61 2 8988 5800
Legal Advisors
Chapman Tripp
Level 35, ANZ Centre
23-29 Albert Street, Auckland 1010
PO Box 2206, Auckland
Phone: +64 9 357 9000
Bankers
ANZ Bank
ASB Bank
Bank of New Zealand
MUFG Bank
Mizuho Bank
Westpac
Credit Rating (reaffirmed December 2017)
Long term: BBB+
Outlook: Stable
Share Register – New Zealand
Computershare Investor Services Ltd
Level 2, 159 Hurstmere Road, Takapuna,
Auckland 0622
Private Bag 92119
Auckland 1142
New Zealand
Phone: +64 9 488 8777
Email: enquiry@computershare.co.nz
Web: www.investorcentre.com/nz
Share Register – Australia
Computershare Investor Services Pty Ltd
Yarra Falls, 452 Johnston Street, Abbotsford, VIC 3067
GPO Box 3329
Melbourne, VIC 3001
Australia
Phone: 1 800 501 366 (within Australia)
Phone: +61 3 9415 4083 (outside Australia)
Email: enquiry@computershare.co.nz
SWITCH TO MERCURY.
CALL 0800 456 534 OR
GO TO mercury.co.nz/join
---
APPENDIX 7 – NZSX Listing Rules
Number of pages including this one
(Please provide any other relevant
NZSX Listing Rule 7.12.2. For rights, NZSX Listing Rules 7.10.9 and 7.10.10. details on additional pages)
For change to allotment, NZSX Listing Rule 7.12.1, a separate advice is required.
Full name
of Issuer
Name of officer authorised to
Authority for event,
make this notice
e.g. Directors' resolution
Contact phone
Contact fax
numbernumber
Date
Nature of event
BonusIf ticked,
Rights Issue
Tick as appropriate
Issue
state whether:Taxable
/ Non TaxableConversionInterestRenouncable
Rights IssueCapitalCallDividend
If ticked, stateFull
non-renouncable
change
X
whether:
InterimYear
X
SpecialDRP Applies
EXISTING securities affected by this
If more than one security is affected by the event, use a separate form.
Description of theISIN
class of securities
If unknown, contact NZX
Details of securities issued pursuant to this eventIf more than one class of security is to be issued, use a separate form for each class.
Description of theISIN
class of securities
If unknown, contact NZX
Number of Securities toMinimum
Ratio, e.g
be issued following eventEntitlement
1 for 2 for
Conversion, Maturity, Call
Treatment of Fractions
Payable or Exercise Date
Tick if
provide an
pari passu
OR explanation
Strike price per security for any issue in lieu or date
of the
Strike Price available.
ranking
Monies Associated with Event
Dividend payable, Call payable, Exercise price, Conversion price, Redemption price, Application money.
Source of
Amount per securityPayment
(does not include any excluded income)
Excluded income per security
(only applicable to listed PIEs)
SupplementaryAmount per security
Currencydividendin dollars and cents
details -
NZSX Listing Rule 7.12.7
Total monies
TaxationAmount per Security in Dollars and cents to six decimal places
In the case of a taxable bonusResident
Imputation Credits
issue state strike priceWithholding Tax(Give details)
Foreign
FDP Credits
Withholding Tax(Give details)
Timing
(Refer Appendix 8 in the NZSX Listing Rules)
Record Date 5pmApplication Date
For calculation of entitlements -Also, Call Payable, Dividend /
Interest Payable, Exercise Date,
Conversion Date.
Notice DateAllotment Date
Entitlement letters, call notices,For the issue of new securities.
conversion notices mailedMust be within 5 business days
of application closing date.
OFFICE USE ONLY
Ex Date:
Commence Quoting Rights:Security Code:
Cease Quoting Rights 5pm:
Commence Quoting New Securities:Security Code:
Cease Quoting Old Security 5pm:
13 September, 201828 September, 2018
New Zealand Dollars$0.016059
$123,916,272.30
Date Payable
28 September, 2018
$$0.006319$0.035389
$
In dollars and cents
Income available for distribution
$0.091
not applicable
Enter N/A if not
applicable
Mercury NZ Limited ordinary sharesNZMRPE0001S2
+64 9 308 8200+64 9 308 820921082018
EMAIL: announce@nzx.com
Notice of event affecting securities
1
Mercury NZ Limited
Howard Thomas, Company SecretaryDirectors' resolution
---
CSN/Security Holder number:
XXXXXXXXX
DEAR SHAREHOLDER,
Mercury is pleased to share with you highlights of our annual results for 2018.
We invite you to view our 2018 Annual Report, along with Mercury's investor
presentation and news release.
VIEW OUR ONLINE
2018 ANNUAL REPORT
SEE OUR INVESTOR
PRESENTATION & NEWS RELEASE
HIGHLIGHTS OF THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2018
OPERATING EARNINGS (EBITDAF)
7% lift to $561 million
reflecting strong and timely hydro inflows across the Waikato River catchment, and
high geothermal availability.
NET PROFIT AFTER TAX
up $50 million to $234 million
FINAL ORDINARY DIVIDEND
9.1 cents per share fully-imputed
This brings the full year fully-imputed ordinary dividend to 15.1 cents per share up
from 14.6 cents per share in FY2017. It is Mercury's tenth consecutive year of
ordinary dividend growth.
Mercury successfully executed a number of key strategic projects through the year.
These included a major technology systems upgrade, completion of Metrix’s meter
data project, hydro refurbishments at Aratiatia and Whakamaru stations (ongoing) and
major maintenance outages at geothermal stations.
Mercury also completed the purchase of a 19.99% stake in Tilt Renewables
(NZX/ASX:TLT) in May, a company with significant operational and consented wind
generation interests in Australasia.
Our brand and customer service activity focused on inspiring, rewarding and making
things easy for customers continues to show strong results, though retail market
conditions remain very competitive.
The Mercury brand maintained its trader churn (customer switching to an alternative
retailer) advantage of 6.4% compared to the rest of the market at 8.1%.
Employee engagement increased to 81.5% from 81% as measured by the 2018 IBM
Employee Engagement Survey. During the year Mercury received major honours at
the IBM Best Workplace Awards and the New Zealand HR Awards.
Mercury is well positioned to build further on its momentum through a focus on
developing its people, inspiring its customers and executing on its growth strategy.
EBITDAF guidance for the year ending 30 June 2019 is $515 million, based on
forecast hydro generation of 4,200 GWh and subject to any material events,
significant one-off expenses or other unforeseeable circumstances including
hydrological conditions. Ordinary fully-imputed FY2019 dividend guidance has been
issued at 15.5 cents per share, a 2.6% increase on FY2018.
Kind regards,
Joan Withers | Chair, Mercury NZ Limited
Customers choose Mercury
FIND OUT MORE
NOTICE OF REPORT AVAILABILITY
Our most recent and future Annual and Interim Reports are, or will be, available on
our website www.mercury.co.nz/investors
If you would like to receive free printed copies or electronic copies of our most recent
and future Annual and Interim Reports, please email ecomms@computershare.co.nz
at any time.
You are receiving this email because you have signed up for electronic security holder communications.
You can unsubscribe to email notifications at any time by logging into Computershare's Investor Centre
http://www.investorcentre.com/nz.
Select 'My profile' and click on the 'update' button on the communication preferences tile.
This email was sent to you by Mercury NZ Limited, Level 3, 109 Carlton Gore Road, Auckland 1023.
© Copyright 2018 Mercury NZ Ltd.
COMPUTERSHARE INVESTOR SERVICES LTD
---
CSN/Security Holder number:
XXXXXXXXX
DEAR BONDHOLDER,
Mercury is pleased to share with you details of our annual results for 2018.
We invite you to view our 2018 Annual Report, along with Mercury's investor presentation
and news release.
VIEW OUR ONLINE
2018 ANNUAL REPORT
SEE OUR INVESTOR PRESENTATION &
NEWS RELEASE
HIGHLIGHTS OF THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2018
OPERATING EARNINGS (EBITDAF)
7% lift to $561 million
reflecting strong and timely hydro inflows across the Waikato River catchment, and high
geothermal availability.
NET PROFIT AFTER TAX
up $50 million to $234 million
S&P Credit Rating
BBB+ re-affirmed in December 2017
Mercury successfully executed a number of key strategic projects through the year. These
included a major technology systems upgrade, completion of Metrix’s meter data project,
hydro refurbishments at Aratiatia and Whakamaru stations (ongoing) and major maintenance
outages at geothermal stations.
Mercury also completed the purchase of a 19.99% stake in Tilt Renewables (NZX/ASX:TLT) in
May, a company with significant operational and consented wind generation interests in
Australasia.
Our brand and customer service activity focused on inspiring, rewarding and making things
easy for customers continues to show strong results, though retail market conditions remain
very competitive.
The Mercury brand maintained its trader churn (customer switching to an alternative retailer)
advantage of 6.4% compared to the rest of the market at 8.1%.
Employee engagement increased to 81.5% from 81% as measured by the 2018 IBM Employee
Engagement Survey. During the year Mercury received major honours at the IBM Best
Workplace Awards and the New Zealand HR Awards.
Mercury is well positioned to build further on its momentum through a focus on developing
its people, inspiring its customers and executing on its growth strategy.
EBITDAF guidance for the year ending 30 June 2019 is $515 million, based on forecast hydro
generation of 4,200 GWh and subject to any material events, significant one-off expenses or
other unforeseeable circumstances including hydrological conditions.
Kind regards,
Joan Withers | Chair, Mercury NZ Limited
Customers choose Mercury
FIND OUT MORE
NOTICE OF REPORT AVAILABILITY
Our most recent and future Annual and Interim Reports are, or will be, available on our
website www.mercury.co.nz/investors
If you would like to receive free printed copies or electronic copies of our most recent and
future Annual and Interim Reports, please email ecomms@computershare.co.nz at any time.
You are receiving this email because you have signed up for electronic security holder communications.
You can unsubscribe to email notifications at any time by logging into Computershare's Investor Centre
http://www.investorcentre.com/nz.
Select 'My profile' and click on the 'update' button on the communication preferences tile.
This email was sent to you by Mercury NZ Limited, Level 3, 109 Carlton Gore Road, Auckland 1023.
© Copyright 2018 Mercury NZ Ltd.
COMPUTERSHARE INVESTOR SERVICES LTD
Data sourced from publicly available filings. Our datasets may not be complete. Automated analysis can produce errors. If you believe any data on this page is incorrect, please contact us at hello@nzxplorer.co.nz. For informational purposes only. Not investment advice.
Other issuers discussed similar conditions around this time
Matched by meaning across NZX announcement text, not keywords — based on our semantic index of announcement bodies.
- MEL — Meridian Energy Limited: Meridian Energy Limited 2018 Full Year Financial Results2018-08-21
“PG 1 Meridian delivers growth and becomes net zero carbon 22 August 2018 Meridian Energy has achieved its highest level of earnings, while overcoming the company’s lowest New Zealand generation since 2013. Group EBITDAF has increased 1.4% to $666 million, thanks to better…”
- FPH — Fisher & Paykel Healthcare Corporation Limited: Fisher & Paykel Healthcare Reports Record Full Year Result2018-05-28
“NZX Appendix 1 Information Results for announcement to the market FULL YEAR REPORTING Reporting Period 12 months to 31 March 2018 Previous Reporting Period 12 months to 31 March 2017 EARNINGS Amount (NZ$000) Percentage change Operating revenue from ordinary activities $…”
- EBO — EBOS Group Limited: ASX Appendix 4E2018-08-22
“2 Dividends Amount per security Franked amount per security to 30% tax rate Final dividend payable 12 October 2018 Final dividend – previous corresponding period 35.5c 33.0c 35.5c 33.0c Key dates for the 2018 Final Dividend: Ex-dividend date Record date:…”