Rakon Limited/Announcement
Rakon Limited logo

Rakon FY2019 Results Announcement

Full Year Results15 May 2019RAKInformation Technology

RESULTS ANNOUNCEMENT

0

Results for announcement to the market

Name of issuer

Rakon Limited (RAK)

Reporting Period

12 months to 31 March 2019

Previous Reporting Period

12 months to 31 March 2018

Currency NZD


Amount (000s) Percentage change

Revenue from continuing

operations

$113,985 12.7%

Total Revenue

$113,985 12.7%

Net profit/(loss) from continuing

operations

$3,364 -66.4%

Total net profit/(loss)

$3,364 -66.4%

Interim/Final Dividend

Amount per Quoted Equity Security

No dividends are proposed to be paid.

Imputed amount per Quoted Equity

Security

Not Applicable

Record Date

Not Applicable

Dividend Payment Date

Not Applicable

Current period Prior comparable period

Net tangible assets per Quoted

Equity Security

$0.35 $0.34

A brief explanation of any of the

figures above necessary to enable

the figures to be understood

Please refer to the comments on the following pages and the audited

financial statements released in conjunction with this announcement

Authority for this announcement

Name of person


authorised

to make this announcement

Maureen Shaddick

Contact person for this

announcement

Anand Rambhai

Contact phone number (09) 571 9225

Contact email address anand.rambhai@rakon.com

Date of release through MAP


16/05/2019


Audited financial statements accompany this announcement.

RESULTS ANNOUNCEMENT

1

COMMENTS

16 May 2019

Steady growth in core business drives improving results


1

All amounts are in NZ$ unless otherwise indicated.


2

Refer to Note B1 of the FY2019 audited consolidated financial statements for an explanation of how ‘Non-GAAP Financial Information’ is used,

including a definition of ‘Underlying EBITDA’ and reconciliation to NPAT.


High technology company Rakon Limited (‘Rakon’ or the ‘Group’) posted a net profit after tax of $3.4m (FY18:

$10.0m), and Underlying EBITDA of $13.3m (FY18: $12.1m) for the year ended 31 March 2019. The Group’s

Underlying EBITDA was in line with earlier guidance provided of between $12m to $14m.

The prior year’s $10m net profit after tax included $8.8m of gains recognised in relation to the sale of property in

Argenteuil France. It also included the dilution gain and sale of shares in Thinxtra Pty Limited.

Managing Director Brent Robinson said, when the one-off gains are excluded it was pleasing to see the year on year

growth in core net profit on the back of stronger 4.5/5G telecommunications infrastructure demand and continuing

growth in the Defence segment.

“The roll-out of 5G continues to be our biggest opportunity and challenge. Rakon is well positioned with a good

share of business awarded by Tier 1 customers. The challenge for Rakon is to meet existing demand and continue to

bring to market new products which meet the higher specifications demanded by 5G applications.

“A key event during the year was the acquisition in May 2018 of the remaining 51% of our previous joint venture

Rakon India Private Limited (previously called ‘Centum Rakon India Private Limited’). With Rakon now having full

decision-making control of India’s low cost manufacturing operation, it was pleasing to see India’s positive

contribution to the Group’s full year result,” he said.

The current year showed higher operating costs with the inclusion of Rakon India from May 2018 and one-off costs

relating to integrating Rakon India into the wider Group.

Net debt was $7.7m (FY18: was a net cash position of $7.4m). This movement was due to the impact of higher

working capital requirements to support growing revenue, the acquisition of Rakon India, and the investment in

additional manufacturing capacity during the year.

The value of Rakon’s investment in Thinxtra changed from $5.3m at March 2018 to $4.5m at March 2019. Thinxtra’s

impact on Rakon’s net profit after tax for the year is -$0.3m. Further explanation is provided in notes B4 d) of the

audited financial statements.

The Directors confirm that this FY2019 results announcement is based on audited results.



Brent Robinson

Chief Executive Officer & Managing Director


NZ$m

1

, audited

FY2019

FY2018

% Change

Revenue

114.0

101.1

13%

Underlying EBITDA

2

13.3

12.1

10%

Net profit/(loss) after tax

3.4

10.0

-66%

Operating expenses

47.3

41.6

14%

Operating cash flow

(1.8)

7.9

-122%

Net cash/(debt)

(7.7)

7.4

-203%

RESULTS ANNOUNCEMENT

2

-ends-


Contact:

Anand Rambhai (CFO)

09 571 9225


Media Liaison:

Louise Howe

021 206 0985



www.rakon.com


About Rakon

Rakon is a global high technology company and a world leader in its field. The company designs and manufactures advanced

frequency control and timing solutions. Its three core markets are Telecommunications, Global Positioning and Space and

Defence. Rakon products are found at the forefront of communications where speed and reliability are paramount. The

company’s products create extremely accurate electric signals which are used to generate radio waves and synchronise time in

the most demanding communication applications. Rakon has six manufacturing plants, including two joint venture plants, and

has six research and development centres. Customer support personnel are located in fifteen offices worldwide.

Rakon is proud of its New Zealand heritage; it was founded in Auckland in 1967. It is a public company listed on the New Zealand

stock exchange, NZSX, ticker code RAK.

RESULTS ANNOUNCEMENT

3

Other Information

A. Dividends (NZX Listing Rules Appendix 2)

The Board of Directors has declared that no dividend is to be paid for FY2019. Rakon maintains a dividend policy

such that it will pay a dividend of up to 50% of the after tax profit, if considered fiscally appropriate. The payment

of dividends is subject to the approval of Rakon’s bank, ASB Bank, under its facility arrangement.

B. Control gained and lost over Entities (NZX Listing Rules Appendix 2)

Rakon Limited has gained control over the following entities during the period:

On 2 May 2018, Rakon acquired the remaining 51% interest in Rakon India that it did not previously own.

C. Associates & Joint Ventures (NZX Listing Rules Appendix 2)

Rakon Limited has the following associate entities and joint venture arrangements.


Shareholding

Rakon India (up to 2 May 2018) 49%

Chengdu Timemaker Crystal Technology Co. Limited 40%

Shenzhen Taixiang Wafer Co, Limited 40%

Thinxtra Pty Limited (up to 31 May 2018) 21.4%


Rakon India ceased being a joint venture on 2 May 2018 when Rakon acquired the remaining 51% of securities

that it did not previously own. For the period to 2 May 2018 Rakon India’s contribution to Rakon Limited’s net

results from ordinary activities is a net profit after tax of $76,000 (March 2018: net loss after tax of $550,000).

The contribution of Chengdu Timemaker and Shenzhen Taixiang (together the Timemaker group) to Rakon

Limited’s net results from ordinary activities is a net profit after tax of $1,050,000 (March 2018: net profit after

tax $908,000).

On 1 June 2018, Rakon irrevocably waived its right to appoint a director to Thinxtra’s board and concurrently

Rakon’s appointed director resigned. Accordingly, it was concluded that Rakon lost significant influence in

Thinxtra on 1 June 2018 and therefore ceased equity accounting the investment. The contribution of Thinxtra

to Rakon Limited’s net results from ordinary activities for the period to 31 May 2018 is a net loss after tax of

$287,000 (March 2018: net loss after tax $2,123,000). From 1 June 2018, Rakon’s investment in Thinxtra was

accounted for as a financial asset.

D. Audit (NZX Listing Rules Appendix 2)

The financial statements have been audited and are not subject to any qualification.

E. Business Changes (NZX Listing Rules Appendix 2)


Acquisition of remaining shares in Rakon India

On 2 May 2018, Rakon Limited acquired the remaining 51% of the issued shares it did not own in Rakon India,

a previously held joint venture which provides products and services to the frequency control industry.

Consideration was US$5.5m and the acquisition was part of the Group’s overall manufacturing strategy,

providing a low cost manufacturing platform and, in addition, access to the local Indian market in the longer

term. Consideration of US$4.1m was paid on 2 May 2018 with US$1.4m payable within 18 months of

acquisition date.

F. Directors’ Declaration (NZX Listing Rules Appendix 2 )

The Directors declare that the financial statements released in conjunction with this announcement have been

prepared in compliance with applicable financial reporting standards. The accounting policies the Directors

consider critical to the portrayal of Rakon Limited’s financial condition and results which require judgements

RESULTS ANNOUNCEMENT

4

and estimates about matters which are inherently uncertain are disclosed in each note of the audited financial

statements that form part of this announcement.

---

PricewaterhouseCoopers, 188 Quay Street, Private Bag 92162, Auckland 1142, New Zealand
T: +64 9 355 8000, F: +64 9 355 8001, pwc.co.nz



Independent auditor’s report

To the shareholders of Rakon Limited

We have audited the financial statements which comprise:

 the balance sheet as at 31 March 2019;

 the statement of comprehensive income for the year then ended;

 the statement of changes in equity for the year then ended;

 the statement of cash flows for the year then ended; and

 the notes to the financial statements, which include significant accounting policies.


Our opinion

In our opinion, the accompanying financial statements of Rakon Limited (the Company), including its

subsidiaries (the Group), present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Group as

at 31 March 2019, its financial performance and its cash flows for the year then ended in accordance

with New Zealand Equivalents to International Financial Reporting Standards (NZ IFRS) and

International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS).

Basis for opinion

We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (New Zealand) (ISAs

(NZ)) and International Standards on Auditing (ISAs). Our responsibilities under those standards are

further described in the Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements section of

our report.

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for

our opinion.

We are independent of the Group in accordance with Professional and Ethical Standard 1 (Revised)

Code of Ethics for Assurance Practitioners (PES 1) issued by the New Zealand Auditing and Assurance

Standards Board and the International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants’ Code of Ethics for

Professional Accountants (IESBA Code), and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in

accordance with these requirements.

Our firm carries out other services for the Group in the areas of treasury advisory services, agreed

upon procedures in relation to the Annual General Meeting and half year financial statements, as well

as review procedures over the confirmation of the Eligible Research and Development Expense

claimed under the Growth Grant. The provision of these other services has not impaired our

independence as auditor of the Group.


PwC

52



Our audit approach

Overview


An audit is designed to obtain reasonable assurance whether the

financial statements are free from material misstatement.

Overall Group materiality: $1,140,000, which represents 1% of

revenue.

Given the changes in the business during recent years, in our

judgement, revenue provided a more stable measure for establishing

our materiality benchmark.

We have determined that there are three key audit matters:

 Impairment risk for non-financial assets

 Valuation of research and development costs associated with the

development of new products

 Accounting for the investment in Thinxtra Limited.

Materiality

The scope of our audit was influenced by our application of materiality.

Based on our professional judgement, we determined certain quantitative thresholds for materiality,

including the overall Group materiality for the financial statements as a whole as set out above. These,

together with qualitative considerations, helped us to determine the scope of our audit, the nature,

timing and extent of our audit procedures and to evaluate the effect of misstatements, both

individually and in aggregate on the financial statements as a whole.

Audit scope

We designed our audit by assessing the risks of material misstatement in the financial statements and

our application of materiality. As in all of our audits, we also addressed the risk of management

override of internal controls including among other matters, consideration of whether there was

evidence of bias that represented a risk of material misstatement due to fraud.

We tailored the scope of our audit in order to perform sufficient work to enable us to provide an

opinion on the financial statements as a whole, taking into account the structure of the Group, the

accounting processes and controls, and the industry in which the Group operates.

We conducted a full scope audit over two segments, New Zealand, including the investment in

Thinxtra, and France and a limited review was conducted for India. Together these make up 100% of

external revenue. We conducted specific audit procedures for the UK subsidiary and for the

investment in Timemaker.

Key audit matters

Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgment, were of most significance in

our audit of the financial statements of the current year. These matters were addressed in the context

of our audit of the financial statements as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, and we do not

provide a separate opinion on these matters.



PwC

53




Key audit matter How our audit addressed the key audit matter

Impairment risk for non-financial assets

As noted in note C1a, the Directors assess

assets annually for impairment. The

Directors look initially for indicators of

impairment which requires a level of

judgement.

When the market capitalisation is lower

than the net asset value of the Group this

can be an indicator of potential

impairment of non-financial assets held by

the Group. Market capitalisation of the

Group at 31 March 2019 was $75.6 million

compared to the carrying value of the net

assets of $90 million.

The Directors performed an assessment of

impairment on an asset class basis as well

as performing a business valuation for the

Group as a whole. The business valuation

was prepared on a value in use basis using

a discounted cash flow model.

The key assumptions used by the

Directors in the discounted cash flow

model are included in note C1a of the

financial statements which include:

 Annual sales growth rate

 Gross margin

 Terminal growth rates

 Discount rates

The results of the Directors’ assessment

are detailed in note C1a.


Our audit procedures included the following:

We updated our understanding of business processes

and controls applied in the assessment of indicators of

impairment of non-financial assets and determining

any impairment required.

In considering the results of the Directors’ assessment

of impairment on an asset class basis we have:

 Considered the historical recoverability of

inventory balances and whether there is any

indication of impairment.

 Assessed whether there were indicators of

impairment for intangible R&D assets, which has

been discussed in the key audit matter below.

 Considered the recoverability of deferred tax

assets.

In considering the discounted cash flow model used for

the assessment of impairment of the business as a

whole we have:

 Compared cash flow forecasts used in the

discounted cash flow models to the latest Board

approved budgets and long-term forecasts.

 Tested the mathematical accuracy of the

underlying model and agreed the carrying value of

each CGU to the audited financial records.

 Assessed the reliability of forecasts by performing

a look back analysis of historical forecasts against

actual results.

 Considered key assumptions used in the

discounted cash flow models, in particular the

estimated sales growth rates, by agreeing to

supporting evidence of:

- Historical sales

- Current orders in place

- Communications with customers

- External market forecast reports.

 Engaged our valuation expert to assess and

challenge the assumptions for terminal growth

rates and discount rates used by management by

comparing them to relevant industry rates and

performing sensitivity analysis on those rates.


PwC

54





Key audit matter How our audit addressed the key audit matter


 Performed a sensitivity analysis on the cash flows

to determine whether a reasonably possible

change in assumptions could lead to a conclusion

that the assets are impaired.

 Assessed the adequacy of disclosures in the

financial statements to ensure that they are

compliant with the requirements of NZ IFRS.

As a result of these procedures we did not propose any

adjustments.

Valuation of research and development

costs associated with the development of

new products

Rakon incurs costs with respect to

developing new products. This is included

within the product development and

assets under construction categories of

intangible assets (note B5b of the financial

statements) and amounts to $6.8 million

at 31 March 2019. There is a risk that the

costs that are being capitalised for

development may not meet the criteria for

capitalisation as an intangible asset under

NZ IFRS.

In particular, there is judgement and often

uncertainty around the potential for

success of new projects as well as the

technical feasibility and probable future

economic benefits associated with new

and existing projects primarily with

respect to telecommunications

infrastructure products.

The Directors assessed the future income

generating ability of capitalised

development expenditure by referring to

current demand for the products now in

production and to the business case for

future sales of products not yet in

production.




Our audit procedures included the following:

 We updated our understanding of how the costs

for research and development are captured and

approved for capitalisation and the controls over

these processes.

 We obtained an understanding of the projects

which have been capitalised during the year and,

on a sample basis, agreed costs incurred to

supporting documentation and approval.

 We assessed overall costs capitalised for

compliance with Group policies and the

requirements defined in NZ IFRS for capitalisation

of research and development costs.

 For those products in production, where costs

have been capitalised, we challenged the Directors’

assessment of the future income expected from

those products by comparing the estimate with the

level of sales currently being achieved.

 We challenged the Directors’ assessment of the

future income expected from new

telecommunications infrastructure products by

comparing the estimate with the level of sales of

previous generations of telecommunications

infrastructure products and with market forecast

reports.

As a result of these procedures we did not propose any

adjustments.


PwC

55




Key audit matter How our audit addressed the key audit matter

Accounting for the investment in Thinxtra

Limited

Rakon holds ordinary shares in Thinxtra

Limited (“Thinxtra”), which was an equity

accounted associate investment in the

prior year. On 1 June 2018, Rakon lost

significant influence triggering a change in

the accounting method from equity

accounting to a financial asset carried at

fair value.

We considered the valuation of the

investment in Thinxtra a key audit matter

because of the uncertainty involved in the

estimation process and the significant

judgements the Directors make in

determining the fair value. Changes in the

assumptions applied as part of the

estimation process can lead to significant

movements in the fair value of the

investment.

The Directors developed a valuation

methodology based on a range of

valuation techniques with different

assigned probabilities based on the

available information and Directors’

judgement, as disclosed in note B4d. This

methodology was applied to estimate the

fair value of the investment as at

1 June 2018 and as at 31 March 2019.

The Directors also considered sensitivity

by determining other reasonably possible

scenarios and assessing the impact on the

valuation of these scenarios.

The results of the Directors’ assessment

and sensitivity analysis is detailed in note

B4d.




Our audit procedures included:

 We obtained an understanding of the valuation

methodology developed by the Directors and the

key assumptions they applied in determining the

fair value of investment in Thinxtra as at 1 June

2018 and 31 March 2019.

 We agreed the key inputs in the valuation model to

unaudited information obtained by management

from Thinxtra.

 We considered the discounted cash flow model

approach which formed part of the Directors’ basis

of valuation. We determined the underlying

forecasts used in the model were not sufficiently

reliable due to Thinxtra’s business being at an

early stage of development, the history of not

meeting budgeted results and the reliance on

raising additional funding to achieve those

forecasts. Accordingly, this required us to take a

different valuation approach to that taken by the

Directors.

 We engaged our valuation expert to provide

support in our assessment of the fair value of the

investment as at 1 June 2018 and 31 March 2019.

Our expert’s assessment was based on the

following valuation approaches:

- Consideration of the share price achieved in

Thinxtra’s capital raise that closed on 18 April

2019, adjusted for an estimated discount to

fair value that would be expected in the

circumstances of that capital raise.

- Cost to replicate approach based on the

capital contributed and the losses incurred to

date on the basis that a purchaser would avoid

those costs to reach the position that Thinxtra

is currently in.

- Look-back assessment of the fair value at

1 June 2018 given the circumstances and

events between 1 June 2018 and

31 March 2019.

 We considered a range of reasonably possible

alternative scenarios. For each scenario, we

assessed whether the changes were reasonably

possible and tested the impact of those changes on

the valuation.


PwC

56




Information other than the financial statements and auditor’s report

The Directors are responsible for the annual report. Our opinion on the financial statements does not

cover the other information included in the annual report and we do not and will not express any form

of assurance conclusion on the other information.

In connection with our audit of the financial statements, our responsibility is to read the other

information and, in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with

the financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit, or otherwise appears to be materially

misstated. If, based on the work we have performed on the other information that we obtained prior to

the date of this auditor’s report, we conclude that there is a material misstatement of this other

information, we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report in this regard, except that

not all other information was available to us at the date of our signing. Prior to the date of this report

we had received and read the Directors’ Report. The Shareholder Information and Corporate

Governance sections of the annual report are expected to be made available to us after the date of our

report.

Responsibilities of the Directors for the financial statements

The Directors are responsible, on behalf of the Company, for the preparation and fair presentation of

the financial statements in accordance with NZ IFRS and IFRS, and for such internal control as the

Directors determine is necessary to enable the preparation of financial statements that are free from

material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

In preparing the financial statements, the Directors are responsible for assessing the Group’s ability to

continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the

going concern basis of accounting unless the Directors either intend to liquidate the Group or to cease

operations, or have no realistic alternative but to do so.

Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements

Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements, as a whole,

are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report

that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee

that an audit conducted in accordance with ISAs (NZ) and ISAs will always detect a material

misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material

if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic

decisions of users taken on the basis of these financial statements.


Key audit matter How our audit addressed the key audit matter


 We assessed the adequacy of disclosures in the

financial statements to ensure that this is compliant

with the requirements of NZ IFRS.

Based on our work we consider that, given the

estimation uncertainty for an investment in a business

of this nature, the fair value determined by the

Directors at 1 June 2018 and at 31 March 2019 is

within the range of reasonable expected outcomes.


PwC

57




A further description of our responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements is located at the

External Reporting Board’s website at:

https://www.xrb.govt.nz/standards-for-assurance-practitioners/auditors-responsibilities/audit-

report-1/


This description forms part of our auditor’s report.

Who we report to

This report is made solely to the Company’s shareholders, as a body. Our audit work has been

undertaken so that we might state those matters which we are required to state to them in an auditor’s

report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, we do not accept or assume

responsibility to anyone other than the Company and the Company’s shareholders, as a body, for our

audit work, for this report or for the opinions we have formed.

The engagement partner on the audit resulting in this independent auditor’s report is Lisa Crooke.

For and on behalf of:





Chartered Accountants

16 May 2019

Auckland

Data sourced from publicly available filings. Our datasets may not be complete. Automated analysis can produce errors. If you believe any data on this page is incorrect, please contact us at hello@nzxplorer.co.nz. For informational purposes only. Not investment advice.