Waiver from NZX LR 2.11
15 December 2021
APPLICATION FOR WAIVER FROM NZX LISTING RULE 2.11
NZX LIMITED
1. This is a decision of the Special Division of the NZ Markets Disciplinary Tribunal
(Special Division).
2. Capitalised terms that are not defined in this decision have the meanings given to
them in the NZX Listing Rules (the Rules).
Background
3. NZX Limited (NZX) is a Listed Issuer with Securities Quoted on the NZX Main Board.
4. NZX operates New Zealand's national stock exchange, including being responsible for
monitoring, enforcing and developing the market rules under which the NZX markets
operate. The exchange's regulatory functions are currently performed by NZX
Regulation Limited (NZ RegCo), a subsidiary of NZX.
5. NZ RegCo was established in August 2020 to undertake regulatory decision-making
under the various market rules that regulate New Zealand's licensed markets,
subject to delegations of authority in place with NZX and its wholly-owned
subsidiaries (the NZX Group). NZ RegCo is governed by its own board separate from
the board of NZX.
6. The Directors of NZ RegCo are appointed and removed by NZX, as the sole
shareholder of NZ RegCo, following consultation with the Financial Markets Authority.
NZX Directors may be appointed to the NZ RegCo board.
7. The NZ RegCo constitution and its board charter requires that NZ RegCo will:
(a) have a minimum of three Directors;
(b) include at least one Director who is also a director of NZX; and
(c) have a majority of Directors, including the Chair, who are independent of
the NZX Group (NZ RegCo Independent Directors).
8. NZX currently pays the NZ RegCo Independent Directors out of the NZX shareholder
approved fee pool. In doing so, it relies on Rule 2.11.3 in that when NZ RegCo was
incorporated and the NZ RegCo Independent Directors were first appointed, the
number of Directors of NZX and its subsidiaries increased.
9. NZX has sought a waiver from the requirements of Rule 2.11 to remove the
requirement that the remuneration payable to NZ RegCo Independent Directors must
be approved by NZX shareholders. In seeking the waiver, NZX advised the Special
Division that it was principally concerned to minimise the perception of any influence
over the regulatory arm that NZ RegCo provides.
Decision
10. Subject to the conditions in paragraph 11 below and on the basis that the
information provided by NZX is complete and accurate in all material respects, the
Special Division grants NZX a waiver from Rule 2.11 (the Waiver) to the extent this
Rule applies to the NZ RegCo Independent Directors specifically.
11. The Waiver is provided subject to the following conditions:
(a) in order to seek any change to the NZ RegCo Independent Director
remuneration, NZX and NZ RegCo comply with the following process:
(i) NZ RegCo seeks remuneration benchmarking advice, which is
relevant to the regulatory role which NZ RegCo performs, in
respect of the NZ RegCo Independent Directors from an
independent professional remuneration adviser (excluding NZX’s
audit firm) from time to time when it considers that it is
appropriate for remuneration to be reviewed.
(ii) The NZ RegCo board proposes remuneration for the NZ RegCo
Independent Directors to the board of NZX that is no greater than
the recommendation it has received in the benchmarking advice.
(iii) The remuneration is subject to approval by the board of NZX as the
shareholder of NZ RegCo. Such approval will not be unreasonably
withheld. Remuneration of the NZ RegCo Independent Directors
may be approved as an individual amount for directors or as a pool.
(b) the NZ RegCo board complies with the requirements under section 161 of
the Companies Act 1993 to resolve and certify that the remuneration is fair
to the company, and the grounds for that opinion;
(c) the NZ RegCo board remuneration is disclosed in the annual report of NZX
as is required under the Companies Act 1993;
(d) the Waiver only applies to the NZ RegCo Independent Directors. Any fees
paid to any NZ RegCo director who is also on the board of NZX will remain
subject to approval under Listing Rule 2.11;
(e) the Waiver, its conditions and its implications are disclosed to the market
and in each of NZX's annual reports for so long as the Waiver is relied upon;
and
(f) for the avoidance of doubt, any NZX notice of meeting to consider a
resolution under Rule 2.11.1 must include disclosure of the Waiver and the
current NZ RegCo Independent Directors’ remuneration for so long as the
Waiver is relied upon.
12. The Waiver will not apply if (a) the information provided to the Special Division is
not, or ceases to be, full and accurate in all material respects; or (b) any of the
conditions are not complied with.
13. The Rule to which this decision relates is set out in Appendix One.
Reasons
14. In coming to the decision to grant the Waiver, the Special Division has considered
the following:
(a) the purpose of Rule 2.11 is to ensure Directors of an Issuer cannot reward
themselves or their associates without the scrutiny of shareholders. The
Special Division is satisfied that granting the Waiver will not offend the
purpose of Rule 2.11 given the conditions set out in paragraph 11, including
that the remuneration will (i) be based on relevant independent
benchmarking advice; (ii) be disclosed to NZX shareholders in each annual
report enabling continued oversight; and (iii) will only apply to the NZ
RegCo Independent Directors;
(b) the nature of NZ RegCo as a separate entity responsible for performing the
regulatory functions required to meet NZX’s obligations as a licensed market
operator and as operator of the designated settlement system is unique to
NZX. NZ RegCo’s governance structure was designed to separate the
exchange’s commercial and regulatory roles and requires an Independent
Chair and a majority of Independent Directors. Other Issuers do not
typically have subsidiaries that perform regulatory functions;
(c) the Waiver, and its conditions, will likely further minimise any influence (or
perceived influence) of the commercial arm of NZX over the regulatory
functions of NZ RegCo by removing the need for the NZ RegCo Independent
Directors’ remuneration to be approved by the shareholders of NZX. Any
change to the remuneration of the NZ RegCo Independent Directors must
instead be based on independent benchmarking advice relevant to their
regulatory role and approved by the board of NZX (as shareholder of NZ
RegCo). The NZX board’s approval may not be unreasonably withheld; and
(d) the Waiver, and its conditions, will likely increase the independence of NZ
RegCo from NZX as the remuneration of the NZ RegCo Independent
Directors will be based on independent benchmarking advice relevant to
their regulatory role.
15. In coming to its decision to grant the Waiver, the Special Division notes that the
circumstances are unique to the NZ RegCo Independent Directors given the
regulatory role they perform in respect of the NZX Markets and the oversight the
Financial Markets Authority has in respect of the performance of that role.
Appendix One - Listing Rule 2.11
2.11 Directors' Remuneration
2.11.1 No remuneration may be paid by an Issuer, or its Subsidiaries (unless such
Subsidiary is Listed), to a Director in his or her capacity as a Director
without prior authorisation by an Ordinary Resolution. Such resolution
must express Directors' remuneration as either a monetary sum per
annum payable to:
(a) all Directors of the Issuer in aggregate, or
(b) any person who from time to time holds office as a Director of the
Issuer.
2.11.2 A resolution for the purposes of Rule 2.11.1:
(a) must only be approved if notice of the amount of any increase in
remuneration has been given in the notice of meeting, and
(b) may provide that the remuneration may, in whole or in part, be
through an issue of Equity Securities, provided the issue is in
compliance with Rule 4.7.
2.11.3 If remuneration is expressed in accordance with Rule 2.11.1(a) and there
is an increase in the number of Directors from the number when the
remuneration was approved by an Ordinary Resolution, the Board may,
without an Ordinary Resolution, increase the remuneration payable to all
Directors of the Issuer in aggregate. The amount of the increase per
additional Director may not exceed the amount necessary to enable the
additional Director or Directors to be paid the average amount then being
paid to each non-Executive Director (other than the chairperson) of the
Issuer.
2.11.4 A lump sum payment or pension may be made to a Director or former
Director, or to his or her dependents, on retirement or cessation of office
provided that the amount of the payment, or the method of calculation,
has been authorised by an Ordinary Resolution.
2.11.5 The resolutions referred to in this Rule 2.11 are subject to the voting
restrictions in Rule 6.3.
Data sourced from publicly available filings. Our datasets may not be complete. Automated analysis can produce errors. If you believe any data on this page is incorrect, please contact us at hello@nzxplorer.co.nz. For informational purposes only. Not investment advice.
Other issuers discussed similar conditions around this time
Matched by meaning across NZX announcement text, not keywords — based on our semantic index of announcement bodies.
- NZL — New Zealand Rural Land Company Limited: Waiver from NZX Listing Rule 5.1.1(b)2021-10-22
“NZ RegCo 18.10.2021 NZ RegCo Decision New Zealand Rural Land Company Limited (NS) (NZL) Application for waiver from NZX Listing Rule 5.1.1(b) NZ RegCo Background 1. The information on which this decision is based is set ou…”
- AIR — Air New Zealand: Waiver from NZX LR 5.1.1 and 5.2.12021-12-14
“NZ RegCo 0 14.12.2021 NZ RegCo Decision Air New Zealand Limited (AIR) Application for waivers from NZX Listing Rules 5.1.1 and 5.2.1 NZ RegCo 1 Contents Background 2 Waiver from Listing Rule 5.1.1 2 Decision 2 Reasons 3-4 Waiver from Listin…”
- AIR — Air New Zealand: Waivers from NZX Listing Rules 5.1.1 and 5.2.1.2021-09-29
“30 September 2021 NZ RegCo Decision Air New Zealand Limited (NS) ("AIR") Application for waivers from NZX Listing Rules 5.1.1 and 5.2.1 NZ RegCo 2 Background 1. The information on which this decision is based is set out in Appendix One to this decision. The…”