When NZXplorer flags governance issues via scoring systems, IR teams can provide context explaining the company's position. Approved responses appear here and inline alongside the relevant governance flags.
No companies have submitted governance flag responses yet. IR teams with an Enterprise subscription can submit responses to provide context on flagged governance issues.
NZXplorer's governance scoring systems (GRS, Remuneration Compliance, Proxy Advisory, Board Effectiveness, Activist Vulnerability) identify areas that may warrant attention based on disclosed data and defined criteria.
IR teams with an Enterprise subscription can submit context explaining their company's position on any flagged item. Responses go through an approval process before publication.
Approved responses appear inline next to the relevant governance flag throughout NZXplorer, and are listed on this page. Responses expire after 12 months to ensure ongoing relevance.
Company responses represent the company's stated position and are published as-is after approval. NZXplorer does not verify or endorse the content of responses. The underlying governance scores remain based on disclosed data and our published methodology.
Data sourced from publicly available NZX filings and annual reports. Our datasets may not be complete. Automated analysis can produce errors. Scores are calculated using disclosed methodology and are analytical tools, not investment ratings or recommendations. If you believe any data on this page is incorrect, please contact us at hello@nzxplorer.co.nz. For informational purposes only. Not investment advice.
NZ Governance Power Index — top directors, board interlocks, auditor concentration, and multi-board analysis.
Interactive force-directed visualization of board interlocks across NZX, charities, iwi, and public sector.
Auditor market concentration, tenure analysis, and director-auditor independence.