How The Bankers Investment Trust PLC makes money

Where BIT’s revenue went in FY2019: operating costs, depreciation, interest and tax, and what was left as net profit. Built from the income statement in the filed annual report, and drawn only when the figures reconcile with each other. BIT company profile

How The Bankers Investment Trust PLC makes money — FY2019

Revenue $30.5m · Net profit $7.6m (24.8% of revenue) · Financial year ending October (from the issuer record)

The Bankers Investment Trust PLC (BIT) FY2019: where revenue of $30.5m wentRevenue → EBIT: $12.5mRevenue → Operating costs incl. depreciation (net of other income): $18.1mEBIT → Net profit: $7.6mEBIT → Interest: $3.1mEBIT → Income tax: $1.8mRevenue: $30.5mRevenue$30.5mEBIT: $12.5mEBIT$12.5mOperating costs incl. depreciation (net of other income): $18.1m (derived)Operating costs incl.depreciation (net ofother income)$18.1m · derivedNet profit: $7.6mNet profit$7.6mInterest: $3.1mInterest$3.1mIncome tax: $1.8mIncome tax$1.8m

Band widths are proportional to NZD amounts. Dashed outlines mark derived figures; the hatched node is a balancing item (net profit less every line above it).

The Bankers Investment Trust PLC FY2019 figures used in the chart
FY2019AmountStatusNote
Revenue$30.5mReported
Operating costs incl. depreciation (net of other income)−$18.1mDerived *Reported operating expenses $5.5m do not reconcile; not used.
Depreciation & amortisation—Not reported
EBIT$12.5mReported
Interest (net finance costs)−$3.1mReported
Income tax−$1.8mReported
Other items (net gain)+$0Balancing item *Net profit less the lines above; covers fair-value movements, impairments, associates and anything else not itemised.
Net profit$7.6mReported
  • * operating costs: $18.1m = Revenue − EBIT
Checks run on these figures (5)
  • Passed: Revenue is within the scale of a column stored in thousands.
  • Passed: Revenue in the income statement ($30.5m) vs the summary table ($30.5m): agree within 2%.
  • Not met: Reported operating expenses ($5.5m) leave $25.1m, not EBIT of $12.5m (gap $12.6m); costs derived as revenue minus operating profit instead. No split is shown.
  • Passed: Balancing item $0m is 0.0% of revenue (limit 25%).
  • Not met: No operating segments recorded for this year.

Figures extracted automatically from the annual report; check against the report. NZD thousands as stored, shown in millions. Source: annual_report_pdf · method: claude_haiku_pdf · extracted 10 March 2026.

Year-on-year EBITDA bridge (FY2018 → FY2019)

Bridge not available: EBITDA isn't a meaningful measure for banks, insurers and property trusts; sector-specific measures (net interest margin, combined ratio, FFO) are not yet held.

Margins over time

Net profit as a share of revenue for each year whose figures passed the checks (1 of 7 years from FY2017). The shaded line is the median of 9 other listed Financials funds and investment companies, using each one’s same financial year where it passed the checks; the number of companies in each median is in the table. Gaps are years that were not charted.

Net margin
BIT net margin by financial year, with peer median0%45%90%FY17FY18FY20FY22FY23FY2017: not charted — no revenueFY2018: not charted — no annual statement on fileFY2019: BIT 24.8%; peer median — (1)FY2020: not charted — no annual statement on fileFY2021: not charted — unexplained residualFY2022: not charted — unexplained residualFY2023: not charted — profit exceeds revenue

BIT   peer median   below the axis: year not charted (reason in the table).

BIT margins by year with peer medians
YearNet margin: BIT · peer median (n)Note
FY2017—— (0)Not charted: no revenue
FY2018—— (1)Not charted: no annual statement on file
FY201924.8%— (1)
FY2020—— (1)Not charted: no annual statement on file
FY2021—81.5% (2)Not charted: unexplained residual
FY2022—— (1)Not charted: unexplained residual
FY2023—— (1)Not charted: profit exceeds revenue

Peer medians use only peer-years that passed the same checks; a median of fewer than two companies is not shown. Years are grouped by financial-year label, and year-end months differ between companies.

Not yet available: where the cash goes (operating cash flow to capex, dividends and debt) and underlying versus reported earnings. The figures they need are not yet validated.

Years not charted

These years are on file but their figures did not pass the checks, so no chart is drawn for them.

  • FY2023: EBIT ($72.2m) exceeds revenue ($40.4m); the figures probably include gains that are not in revenue, or one is mis-extracted.
  • FY2022: After placing every reported line, $303.3m (802% of revenue) is left unexplained between EBIT and net profit. A residual that large usually means a line was mis-extracted, so the chart is not drawn.
  • FY2021: After placing every reported line, $31.3m (89% of revenue) is left unexplained between EBIT and net profit. A residual that large usually means a line was mis-extracted, so the chart is not drawn.
  • FY2017: Revenue is not recorded for this year.
  • FY2016: Figures were not read from a filed annual report (source: not recorded).
  • FY2015: Figures were not read from a filed annual report (source: not recorded).

All companies with a chart

Data sourced from NZX company annual reports (income statements). Our datasets may not be complete. Automated analysis can produce errors. If you believe any data on this page is incorrect, please contact us at hello@nzxplorer.co.nz.

For informational purposes only. Not investment advice.

Get NZX governance insights in your inbox

Weekly digest of board changes, insider trades, and market signals. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.