NZX Governance Explorer

How Asset Plus makes money

Where APL’s revenue went in FY2015: operating costs, depreciation, interest and tax, and what was left as net profit. Built from the income statement in the filed annual report, and drawn only when the figures reconcile with each other. APL company profile

How Asset Plus makes money — FY2015

Revenue $16.5m · Net profit $6.4m (38.6% of revenue) · Financial year ending March (from the issuer record)

Asset Plus (APL) FY2015: where revenue of $16.5m wentRevenue → EBIT: $7.0mRevenue → Operating costs incl. depreciation (net of other income): $9.6mEBIT → Net profit: $6.4mEBIT → Interest: $574kOther items (net gain) → Interest: $1.9mOther items (net gain) → Income tax: $933kRevenue: $16.5mRevenue$16.5mEBIT: $7.0mEBIT$7.0mOperating costs incl. depreciation (net of other income): $9.6m (derived)Operating costs incl.depreciation (net ofother income)$9.6m · derivedOther items (net gain): $2.9m (balancing item)Other items (net gain)$2.9m · balancingNet profit: $6.4mNet profit$6.4mInterest: $2.5mInterest$2.5mIncome tax: $933kIncome tax$933k

Band widths are proportional to NZD amounts. Dashed outlines mark derived figures; the hatched node is a balancing item (net profit less every line above it).

Asset Plus FY2015 figures used in the chart
FY2015AmountStatusNote
Revenue$16.5mReported
Operating costs incl. depreciation (net of other income)−$9.6mDerived *Reported operating expenses $7.2m do not reconcile; not used.
Depreciation & amortisation—Not reported
EBIT$7.0mReported
Interest (net finance costs)−$2.5mReported
Income tax−$933kReported
Other items (net gain)+$2.9mBalancing item *Net profit less the lines above; covers fair-value movements, impairments, associates and anything else not itemised.
Net profit$6.4mReported
  • * operating costs: $9.6m = Revenue − EBIT
Checks run on these figures (5)
  • Passed: Revenue is within the scale of a column stored in thousands.
  • Passed: Revenue in the income statement ($16.5m) vs the summary table ($16.5m): agree within 2%.
  • Not met: Reported operating expenses ($7.2m) leave $9.4m, not EBIT of $7m (gap $2.4m); costs derived as revenue minus operating profit instead. No split is shown.
  • Passed: Balancing item $2.9m is 17.4% of revenue (limit 25%).
  • Not met: Segment(s) with negative revenue that are not eliminations (Property operating expenses); not drawn.

Figures extracted automatically from the annual report; check against the report. NZD thousands as stored, shown in millions. Source: annual_report_pdf · method: claude_haiku_pdf · extracted 7 March 2026.

Annual report: CLICK TO DOWNLOAD (PDF, NZX)

Year-on-year EBITDA bridge (FY2014 → FY2015)

Bridge not available: EBITDA isn't a meaningful measure for banks, insurers and property trusts; sector-specific measures (net interest margin, combined ratio, FFO) are not yet held.

Margins over time

Net profit as a share of revenue for each year whose figures passed the checks (4 of 9 years from FY2017). The shaded line is the median of 9 other listed Real Estate property trusts, using each one’s same financial year where it passed the checks; the number of companies in each median is in the table. Gaps are years that were not charted.

Net margin
APL net margin by financial year, with peer median0%40%80%FY17FY18FY20FY22FY24FY25FY2017: APL 17.9%; peer median — (0)FY2018: APL 14.5%; peer median — (0)FY2019: APL 41.6%; peer median — (1)FY2020: not charted — unexplained residualFY2021: not charted — unexplained residualFY2022: APL 24.6%; peer median 73.8% (2)FY2023: not charted — operating lossFY2024: not charted — operating lossFY2025: not charted — unexplained residual

APL   peer median   below the axis: year not charted (reason in the table).

APL margins by year with peer medians
YearNet margin: APL · peer median (n)Note
FY201717.9%— (0)
FY201814.5%— (0)
FY201941.6%— (1)
FY2020—— (0)Not charted: unexplained residual
FY2021—— (0)Not charted: unexplained residual
FY202224.6%73.8% (2)
FY2023—— (0)Not charted: operating loss
FY2024—— (1)Not charted: operating loss
FY2025—30.5% (4)Not charted: unexplained residual

Peer medians use only peer-years that passed the same checks; a median of fewer than two companies is not shown. Years are grouped by financial-year label, and year-end months differ between companies.

Not yet available: where the cash goes (operating cash flow to capex, dividends and debt) and underlying versus reported earnings. The figures they need are not yet validated.

Years not charted

These years are on file but their figures did not pass the checks, so no chart is drawn for them.

  • FY2025: After placing every reported line, -$5.4m (79% of revenue) is left unexplained between EBIT and net profit. A residual that large usually means a line was mis-extracted, so the chart is not drawn.
  • FY2024: EBIT is -$0.4m. This layout does not draw an operating loss.
  • FY2023: EBIT is -$0.5m. This layout does not draw an operating loss.
  • FY2021: After placing every reported line, $9.3m (93% of revenue) is left unexplained between EBIT and net profit. A residual that large usually means a line was mis-extracted, so the chart is not drawn.
  • FY2020: After placing every reported line, -$19.2m (175% of revenue) is left unexplained between EBIT and net profit. A residual that large usually means a line was mis-extracted, so the chart is not drawn.

All companies with a chart

Data sourced from NZX company annual reports (income statements). Our datasets may not be complete. Automated analysis can produce errors. If you believe any data on this page is incorrect, please contact us at hello@nzxplorer.co.nz.

For informational purposes only. Not investment advice.

Get NZX governance insights in your inbox

Weekly digest of board changes, insider trades, and market signals. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.