How Enprise Group Limited makes money

Where ENS’s revenue went in FY2016: operating costs, depreciation, interest and tax, and what was left as net profit. Built from the income statement in the filed annual report, and drawn only when the figures reconcile with each other. ENS company profile

How Enprise Group Limited makes money — FY2016

Revenue $7.3m · EBITDA $733k (10.1% of revenue) · Net profit $683k (9.4% of revenue) · Financial year ending June (from the issuer record)

Enprise Group Limited (ENS) FY2016: where revenue of $7.3m wentRevenue → EBITDA: $733kRevenue → Operating costs (net of other income): $6.5mEBITDA → EBIT: $604kEBITDA → Depreciation & amortisation: $129kEBIT → Net profit: $604kIncome tax credit → Net profit: $79kIncome tax credit → Interest: $30kOther items (net gain) → Interest: $11kRevenue: $7.3mRevenue$7.3mEBITDA: $733kEBITDA$733kOperating costs (net of other income): $6.5m (derived)Operating costs (net ofother income)$6.5m · derivedEBIT: $604kEBIT$604kDepreciation & amortisation: $129kDepreciation &amortisation$129kIncome tax credit: $109kIncome tax credit$109kOther items (net gain): $11k (balancing item)Other items (net gain)$11k · balancingNet profit: $683kNet profit$683kInterest: $41kInterest$41k

Band widths are proportional to NZD amounts. Dashed outlines mark derived figures; the hatched node is a balancing item (net profit less every line above it).

Enprise Group Limited FY2016 figures used in the chart
FY2016AmountStatusNote
Revenue$7.3mReported
Operating costs (net of other income)−$6.5mDerived *Reported operating expenses $4.1m do not reconcile; not used.
EBITDA$733kReported
Depreciation & amortisation−$129kReported
EBIT$604kReported
Interest (net finance costs)−$41kReported
Income tax credit+$109kReported
Other items (net gain)+$11kBalancing item *Net profit less the lines above; covers fair-value movements, impairments, associates and anything else not itemised.
Net profit$683kReported
  • * operating costs: $6.5m = Revenue − EBITDA
Checks run on these figures (6)
  • Passed: Revenue is within the scale of a column stored in thousands.
  • Passed: Revenue in the income statement ($7.3m) vs the summary table ($7.3m): agree within 2%.
  • Passed: EBITDA − D&A = $0.6m vs reported EBIT $0.6m: reconciles.
  • Not met: Reported operating expenses ($4.1m) leave $3.2m, not EBITDA of $0.7m (gap $2.4m); costs derived as revenue minus operating profit instead. No split is shown.
  • Passed: Balancing item $0m is 0.2% of revenue (limit 25%).
  • Not met: No operating segments recorded for this year.

Figures extracted automatically from the annual report; check against the report. NZD thousands as stored, shown in millions. Source: annual_report_pdf · method: claude_haiku_pdf · extracted 7 March 2026.

Annual report: 2016 Annual Report (Enprise Group) (PDF, NZX)

EBITDA bridge, FY2015 → FY2016

What moved EBITDA between the two years: the change in revenue, less the change in operating costs (revenue less EBITDA, net of other income; not a reported line). The costs are one net figure; no split by type is held, so none is shown.

ENS EBITDA bridge FY2015 to FY2016FY2015 EBITDA: $0.4m$0.4mFY2015 EBITDARevenue change: +$0.3m+$0.3mRevenue changeCost change (derived): +$0.1m+$0.1mCost change (derived)FY2016 EBITDA: $0.7m$0.7mFY2016 EBITDA
ENS EBITDA bridge FY2015 to FY2016: figures
StepFY2015FY2016Effect on EBITDAStatus
FY2015 EBITDA$0.4m$0.4mAs charted
Revenue$7.0m$7.3m+$0.3mReported
Operating costs (net, derived)$6.6m$6.5m+$0.1mDerived: revenue − EBITDA
FY2016 EBITDA$0.7m$0.7mAs charted

$0.4m +$0.3m +$0.1m = $0.7m, which equals FY2016 EBITDA of $0.7m. EBITDA is the figure stored from each statement; companies that headline an adjusted measure (EBITDAF, underlying EBITDA) can report a different number.

What changed from FY2015 to FY2016

MeasureFY2015FY2016ChangeChange %
Revenue$7.0m$7.3m+$281k+4.0%
EBITDA$354k$733k+$379k+107.1%
Net profit$232k$683k+$451k+194.4%
EBITDA margin5.1%10.1%+5.0 pts—
Net margin3.3%9.4%+6.1 pts—

Both years passed the same checks. Margins are shares of revenue; their change is in percentage points. n/m = not meaningful (prior-year figure at or below zero). Each year holds the figures from its own annual report; restated comparatives are not applied.

Margins over time

EBITDA, EBIT and net profit as a share of revenue for each year whose figures passed the checks (4 of 8 years from FY2018). The shaded line is the median of 6 other listed Information Technology operating companies, using each one’s same financial year where it passed the checks; the number of companies in each median is in the table. Gaps are years that were not charted.

EBITDA margin
ENS ebitda margin by financial year, with peer median-10%5%20%FY18FY20FY22FY24FY25FY2018: ENS 9.0%; peer median — (1)FY2019: ENS 11.6%; peer median — (1)FY2020: ENS 18.4%; peer median — (0)FY2021: ENS 12.5%; peer median — (0)FY2022: not charted — operating lossFY2023: not charted — operating lossFY2024: not charted — operating lossFY2025: not charted — operating loss
EBIT margin
ENS ebit margin by financial year, with peer median-10%5%20%FY18FY20FY22FY24FY25FY2018: ENS 7.7%; peer median — (1)FY2019: ENS 9.9%; peer median — (1)FY2020: ENS 12.7%; peer median — (0)FY2021: ENS 4.2%; peer median — (0)FY2022: not charted — operating lossFY2023: not charted — operating lossFY2024: not charted — operating lossFY2025: not charted — operating loss
Net margin
ENS net margin by financial year, with peer median-10%5%20%FY18FY20FY22FY24FY25FY2018: ENS 1.7%; peer median — (1)FY2019: ENS -9.0%; peer median — (1)FY2020: ENS 10.9%; peer median — (0)FY2021: ENS 4.8%; peer median — (0)FY2022: not charted — operating lossFY2023: not charted — operating lossFY2024: not charted — operating lossFY2025: not charted — operating loss

ENS   peer median   below the axis: year not charted (reason in the table). All panels share one scale.

ENS margins by year with peer medians
YearEBITDA margin: ENS · peer median (n)EBIT margin: ENS · peer median (n)Net margin: ENS · peer median (n)Note
FY20189.0%— (1)7.7%— (1)1.7%— (1)
FY201911.6%— (1)9.9%— (1)-9.0%— (1)
FY202018.4%— (0)12.7%— (0)10.9%— (0)
FY202112.5%— (0)4.2%— (0)4.8%— (0)
FY2022—— (1)—— (1)—— (1)Not charted: operating loss
FY2023—— (0)—— (0)—— (0)Not charted: operating loss
FY2024—13.8% (3)—5.4% (3)—4.5% (3)Not charted: operating loss
FY2025—15.0% (3)—5.9% (3)—7.6% (3)Not charted: operating loss

Peer medians use only peer-years that passed the same checks; a median of fewer than two companies is not shown. Years are grouped by financial-year label, and year-end months differ between companies.

Not yet available: where the cash goes (operating cash flow to capex, dividends and debt) and underlying versus reported earnings. The figures they need are not yet validated.

Years not charted

These years are on file but their figures did not pass the checks, so no chart is drawn for them.

  • FY2025: EBIT is -$0.1m. This layout does not draw an operating loss.
  • FY2024: EBIT is -$0.3m. This layout does not draw an operating loss.
  • FY2023: EBIT is -$2.8m. This layout does not draw an operating loss.
  • FY2022: EBITDA is -$0.4m. This layout draws revenue flowing into profit and does not draw an operating loss.
  • FY2014: EBITDA is -$0.1m. This layout draws revenue flowing into profit and does not draw an operating loss.
  • FY2013: EBITDA is -$0.4m. This layout draws revenue flowing into profit and does not draw an operating loss.

All companies with a chart

Data sourced from NZX company annual reports (income statements). Our datasets may not be complete. Automated analysis can produce errors. If you believe any data on this page is incorrect, please contact us at hello@nzxplorer.co.nz.

For informational purposes only. Not investment advice.

Get NZX governance insights in your inbox

Weekly digest of board changes, insider trades, and market signals. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.