How Oceania Healthcare Limited makes money

Where OCA’s revenue went in FY2018: operating costs, depreciation, interest and tax, and what was left as net profit. Built from the income statement in the filed annual report, and drawn only when the figures reconcile with each other. OCA company profile

How Oceania Healthcare Limited makes money — FY2018

Revenue $180.0m · EBITDA $87.5m (48.6% of revenue) · Net profit $77.0m (42.8% of revenue) · Financial year ending March (from the issuer record)

Oceania Healthcare Limited (OCA) FY2018: where revenue of $180.0m wentRevenue → EBITDA: $87.5mRevenue → Operating costs (net of other income): $92.6mEBITDA → EBIT: $78.7mEBITDA → Depreciation & amortisation: $8.8mEBIT → Net profit: $76.8mEBIT → Interest: $1.8mIncome tax credit → Interest: $1.1mRevenue: $180.0mRevenue$180.0mEBITDA: $87.5mEBITDA$87.5mOperating costs (net of other income): $92.6m (derived)Operating costs (net ofother income)$92.6m · derivedEBIT: $78.7m (derived)EBIT$78.7m · derivedDepreciation & amortisation: $8.8mDepreciation &amortisation$8.8mIncome tax credit: $1.1mIncome tax credit$1.1mNet profit: $77.0mNet profit$77.0mInterest: $2.9mInterest$2.9m

Band widths are proportional to NZD amounts. Dashed outlines mark derived figures; the hatched node is a balancing item (net profit less every line above it).

Oceania Healthcare Limited FY2018 figures used in the chart
FY2018AmountStatusNote
Revenue$180.0mReported
Operating costs (net of other income)−$92.6mDerived *Reported operating expenses $165.8m do not reconcile; not used.
EBITDA$87.5mReported
Depreciation & amortisation−$8.8mReported
EBIT$78.7mDerived *Reported EBIT $83.5m does not reconcile to EBITDA − D&A.
Interest (net finance costs)−$2.9mReported
Income tax credit+$1.1mReported
Other items (net gain)+$165kBalancing item *Net profit less the lines above; covers fair-value movements, impairments, associates and anything else not itemised.
Net profit$77.0mReported
  • * ebit: $78.7m = EBITDA − D&A (reported EBIT $83.5m differs; the gap falls into Other items)
  • * operating costs: $92.6m = Revenue − EBITDA
Checks run on these figures (6)
  • Passed: Revenue is within the scale of a column stored in thousands.
  • Passed: Revenue in the income statement ($180m) vs the summary table ($180m): agree within 2%.
  • Not met: EBITDA − D&A = $78.7m vs reported EBIT $83.5m: does not reconcile.
  • Not met: Reported operating expenses ($165.8m) leave $14.2m, not EBITDA of $87.5m (gap -$73.3m); costs derived as revenue minus operating profit instead. No split is shown.
  • Passed: Balancing item $0.2m is 0.1% of revenue (limit 25%).
  • Not met: No operating segments recorded for this year.

Figures extracted automatically from the annual report; check against the report. NZD thousands as stored, shown in millions. Source: annual_report_pdf · method: claude_haiku_pdf · extracted 7 March 2026.

Annual report: FY2018 Annual Report (PDF, NZX)

EBITDA bridge, FY2017 → FY2018

What moved EBITDA between the two years: the change in revenue, less the change in operating costs (revenue less EBITDA, net of other income; not a reported line). The costs are one net figure; no split by type is held, so none is shown.

OCA EBITDA bridge FY2017 to FY2018FY2017 EBITDA: $75.3m$75.3mFY2017 EBITDARevenue change: +$8.2m+$8.2mRevenue changeCost change (derived): +$4.0m+$4.0mCost change (derived)FY2018 EBITDA: $87.5m$87.5mFY2018 EBITDA
OCA EBITDA bridge FY2017 to FY2018: figures
StepFY2017FY2018Effect on EBITDAStatus
FY2017 EBITDA$75.3m$75.3mAs charted
Revenue$171.9m$180.0m+$8.2mReported
Operating costs (net, derived)$96.6m$92.6m+$4.0mDerived: revenue − EBITDA
FY2018 EBITDA$87.5m$87.5mAs charted

$75.3m +$8.2m +$4.0m = $87.5m, which equals FY2018 EBITDA of $87.5m. EBITDA is the figure stored from each statement; companies that headline an adjusted measure (EBITDAF, underlying EBITDA) can report a different number.

What changed from FY2017 to FY2018

MeasureFY2017FY2018ChangeChange %
Revenue$171.9m$180.0m+$8.2m+4.7%
EBITDA$75.3m$87.5m+$12.2m+16.1%
Net profit$44.9m$77.0m+$32.1m+71.5%
EBITDA margin43.8%48.6%+4.8 pts—
Net margin26.1%42.8%+16.6 pts—

Both years passed the same checks. Margins are shares of revenue; their change is in percentage points. n/m = not meaningful (prior-year figure at or below zero). Each year holds the figures from its own annual report; restated comparatives are not applied.

Margins over time

EBITDA, EBIT and net profit as a share of revenue for each year whose figures passed the checks (8 of 9 years from FY2017). The shaded line is the median of 11 other listed Healthcare operating companies, using each one’s same financial year where it passed the checks; the number of companies in each median is in the table. Gaps are years that were not charted.

EBITDA margin
OCA ebitda margin by financial year, with peer median0%25%50%FY17FY18FY20FY22FY24FY25FY2017: OCA 43.8%; peer median — (0)FY2018: OCA 48.6%; peer median 6.1% (2)FY2019: OCA 14.4%; peer median 9.0% (3)FY2020: not charted — unexplained residualFY2021: OCA 32.0%; peer median 16.8% (3)FY2022: OCA 33.0%; peer median 17.7% (4)FY2023: OCA 32.4%; peer median 11.4% (5)FY2024: OCA 31.1%; peer median 12.2% (7)FY2025: OCA 33.0%; peer median 13.2% (7)
EBIT margin
OCA ebit margin by financial year, with peer median0%25%50%FY17FY18FY20FY22FY24FY25FY2017: OCA 39.2%; peer median — (1)FY2018: OCA 43.7%; peer median 5.6% (3)FY2019: OCA 12.1%; peer median 7.1% (4)FY2020: not charted — unexplained residualFY2021: OCA 24.2%; peer median 9.5% (5)FY2022: OCA 28.6%; peer median 13.8% (4)FY2023: OCA 25.1%; peer median 6.9% (5)FY2024: OCA 24.0%; peer median 6.4% (7)FY2025: OCA 28.4%; peer median 8.8% (7)
Net margin
OCA net margin by financial year, with peer median0%25%50%FY17FY18FY20FY22FY24FY25FY2017: OCA 26.1%; peer median — (1)FY2018: OCA 42.8%; peer median 3.8% (3)FY2019: OCA 24.0%; peer median 3.0% (4)FY2020: not charted — unexplained residualFY2021: OCA 48.8%; peer median 2.0% (5)FY2022: OCA 26.5%; peer median 7.9% (4)FY2023: OCA 6.2%; peer median 2.9% (5)FY2024: OCA 11.9%; peer median 3.1% (7)FY2025: OCA 11.7%; peer median 5.5% (7)

OCA   peer median   below the axis: year not charted (reason in the table). All panels share one scale.

OCA margins by year with peer medians
YearEBITDA margin: OCA · peer median (n)EBIT margin: OCA · peer median (n)Net margin: OCA · peer median (n)Note
FY201743.8%— (0)39.2%— (1)26.1%— (1)
FY201848.6%6.1% (2)43.7%5.6% (3)42.8%3.8% (3)
FY201914.4%9.0% (3)12.1%7.1% (4)24.0%3.0% (4)
FY2020—9.3% (4)—12.8% (6)—7.9% (6)Not charted: unexplained residual
FY202132.0%16.8% (3)24.2%9.5% (5)48.8%2.0% (5)
FY202233.0%17.7% (4)28.6%13.8% (4)26.5%7.9% (4)
FY202332.4%11.4% (5)25.1%6.9% (5)6.2%2.9% (5)
FY202431.1%12.2% (7)24.0%6.4% (7)11.9%3.1% (7)
FY202533.0%13.2% (7)28.4%8.8% (7)11.7%5.5% (7)

Peer medians use only peer-years that passed the same checks; a median of fewer than two companies is not shown. Years are grouped by financial-year label, and year-end months differ between companies.

Not yet available: where the cash goes (operating cash flow to capex, dividends and debt) and underlying versus reported earnings. The figures they need are not yet validated.

Years not charted

These years are on file but their figures did not pass the checks, so no chart is drawn for them.

  • FY2020: After placing every reported line, -$71m (37% of revenue) is left unexplained between EBIT and net profit. A residual that large usually means a line was mis-extracted, so the chart is not drawn.

All companies with a chart

Data sourced from NZX company annual reports (income statements). Our datasets may not be complete. Automated analysis can produce errors. If you believe any data on this page is incorrect, please contact us at hello@nzxplorer.co.nz.

For informational purposes only. Not investment advice.

Get NZX governance insights in your inbox

Weekly digest of board changes, insider trades, and market signals. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.