Get NZX governance insights in your inbox

Weekly digest of board changes, insider trades, and market signals. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Corporate Risk Score

Composite 0-100 risk score aggregating litigation, regulatory actions, governance, accounting quality, and audit independence

Export Risk Scores Pro Risk Change Alerts Pro

131

Companies Scored

Average Score

Low Risk

Moderate/Elevated

High/Critical

Risk by Sector

Sector	Companies	Avg Score
Energy	1	27
Materials	10	22
Information Technology	8	22
Real Estate	15	19
Financials	22	19
Healthcare	12	18
Utilities	7	18
Industrials	23	16
Consumer Staples	14	16
Consumer Discretionary	15	16
Communication Services	4	16

All Companies — Risk Leaderboard

Sorted by composite risk score (highest risk first). Score range: 0 (lowest risk) to 100 (highest risk).

Ticker	Company	Sector	Score	Rating	Lit	Reg	Gov	Fin	Top Signals
TCM	Taiko Critical Minerals Limited	Materials	39	Moderate	0	0	83	100

Methodology

The Corporate Risk Score aggregates 6 risk dimensions into a single 0-100 composite score. Higher scores indicate more risk signals detected. Scores are computed on-the-fly from the latest available data.

Litigation

20%

Court cases linked to issuer

Regulatory

20%

FMA/regulatory enforcement actions

Governance

20%

Inverted Governance Risk Score (GRS v2)

Financial Risk

20%

M-score, Z-score, F-score analysis

Audit Independence

10%

Non-audit fee ratio

Disclosure

10%

Filing completeness (placeholder)

Low

0-20

Moderate

21-40

Elevated

See also: Accounting Quality — M-score, Z-score, F-score analysis. · Regulatory Enforcement — FMA and regulatory actions database. · Court Litigation — court cases linked to NZX issuers. · Audit Independence — non-audit fee ratios and auditor changes.

Related Insights

Regulatory Enforcement & Prohibited Directors

Track FMA, Commerce Commission, and NZX enforcement actions against listed companies. Includes prohibited directors from Companies Office.

Court Litigation History

Track court cases involving NZX-listed companies and their directors from High Court, Court of Appeal, and Supreme Court. Includes case type, outcome, damages, and party roles.

Governance Red Flags Report

Companies with multiple governance indicators below common thresholds. Flags include: low board independence (<50%), no female directors, resolutions not passed, directors with 12+ year tenure (NZX independence threshold), and low GRS scores (<50).

Data sourced from NZX governance data, court records, regulatory actions, and financial statement analysis. Our datasets may not be complete. Automated analysis can produce errors. If you believe any data on this page is incorrect, please contact us at hello@nzxplorer.co.nz.

For informational purposes only. Not investment advice.