How Allied Farmers Limited makes money

Where ALF’s revenue went in FY2022: operating costs, depreciation, interest and tax, and what was left as net profit. Built from the income statement in the filed annual report, and drawn only when the figures reconcile with each other. ALF company profile

How Allied Farmers Limited makes money — FY2022

Revenue $26.8m · EBITDA $5.4m (20.3% of revenue) · Net profit $3.5m (13.2% of revenue) · Financial year ending June (from the issuer record)

Allied Farmers Limited (ALF) FY2022: where revenue of $26.8m wentRevenue → EBITDA: $5.4mRevenue → Operating costs (net of other income): $21.4mEBITDA → EBIT: $4.6mEBITDA → Depreciation & amortisation: $892kEBIT → Net profit: $3.5mEBIT → Interest: $292kEBIT → Income tax: $24kEBIT → Other items (net cost): $707kRevenue: $26.8mRevenue$26.8mEBITDA: $5.4mEBITDA$5.4mOperating costs (net of other income): $21.4m (derived)Operating costs (net ofother income)$21.4m · derivedEBIT: $4.6m (derived)EBIT$4.6m · derivedDepreciation & amortisation: $892kDepreciation &amortisation$892kNet profit: $3.5mNet profit$3.5mInterest: $292kInterest$292kIncome tax: $24kIncome tax$24kOther items (net cost): $707k (balancing item)Other items (net cost)$707k · balancing

Band widths are proportional to NZD amounts. Dashed outlines mark derived figures; the hatched node is a balancing item (net profit less every line above it).

Allied Farmers Limited FY2022 figures used in the chart
FY2022AmountStatusNote
Revenue$26.8mReported
Operating costs (net of other income)−$21.4mDerived *Reported operating expenses $4.7m do not reconcile; not used.
EBITDA$5.4mReported
Depreciation & amortisation−$892kReported
EBIT$4.6mDerived *Reported EBIT $3.6m does not reconcile to EBITDA − D&A.
Interest (net finance costs)−$292kReported
Income tax−$24kReported
Other items (net cost)−$707kBalancing item *Net profit less the lines above; covers fair-value movements, impairments, associates and anything else not itemised.
Net profit$3.5mReported
  • * ebit: $4.6m = EBITDA − D&A (reported EBIT $3.6m differs; the gap falls into Other items)
  • * operating costs: $21.4m = Revenue − EBITDA
Checks run on these figures (6)
  • Passed: Revenue is within the scale of a column stored in thousands.
  • Passed: Revenue in the income statement ($26.8m) vs the summary table ($26.8m): agree within 2%.
  • Not met: EBITDA − D&A = $4.6m vs reported EBIT $3.6m: does not reconcile.
  • Not met: Reported operating expenses ($4.7m) leave $22.2m, not EBITDA of $5.4m (gap $16.7m); costs derived as revenue minus operating profit instead. No split is shown.
  • Passed: Balancing item -$0.7m is 2.6% of revenue (limit 25%).
  • Not met: No operating segments recorded for this year.

Figures extracted automatically from the annual report; check against the report. NZD thousands as stored, shown in millions. Source: annual_report_pdf · method: claude_haiku_pdf · extracted 7 March 2026.

Annual report: FY22 Annual Report (PDF, NZX)

EBITDA bridge, FY2021 → FY2022

What moved EBITDA between the two years: the change in revenue, less the change in operating costs (revenue less EBITDA, net of other income; not a reported line). The costs are one net figure; no split by type is held, so none is shown.

ALF EBITDA bridge FY2021 to FY2022FY2021 EBITDA: $3.3m$3.3mFY2021 EBITDARevenue change: +$5.2m+$5.2mRevenue changeCost change (derived): −$3.0m−$3.0mCost change (derived)FY2022 EBITDA: $5.4m$5.4mFY2022 EBITDA
ALF EBITDA bridge FY2021 to FY2022: figures
StepFY2021FY2022Effect on EBITDAStatus
FY2021 EBITDA$3.3m$3.3mAs charted
Revenue$21.7m$26.8m+$5.2mReported
Operating costs (net, derived)$18.4m$21.4m−$3.0mDerived: revenue − EBITDA
FY2022 EBITDA$5.4m$5.4mAs charted

$3.3m +$5.2m −$3.0m = $5.4m, which equals FY2022 EBITDA of $5.4m. EBITDA is the figure stored from each statement; companies that headline an adjusted measure (EBITDAF, underlying EBITDA) can report a different number.

What changed from FY2021 to FY2022

MeasureFY2021FY2022ChangeChange %
Revenue$21.7m$26.8m+$5.2m+23.8%
EBITDA$3.3m$5.4m+$2.1m+64.7%
Net profit$2.6m$3.5m+$956k+37.1%
EBITDA margin15.3%20.3%+5.0 pts—
Net margin11.9%13.2%+1.3 pts—

Both years passed the same checks. Margins are shares of revenue; their change is in percentage points. n/m = not meaningful (prior-year figure at or below zero). Each year holds the figures from its own annual report; restated comparatives are not applied.

Margins over time

EBITDA, EBIT and net profit as a share of revenue for each year whose figures passed the checks (8 of 10 years from FY2017). The shaded line is the median of 5 other listed Financials operating companies, using each one’s same financial year where it passed the checks; the number of companies in each median is in the table. Gaps are years that were not charted.

EBITDA margin
ALF ebitda margin by financial year, with peer median0%15%30%FY17FY18FY20FY22FY24FY26FY2017: not charted — not from annual reportFY2018: ALF 16.0%; peer median — (1)FY2019: ALF 13.4%; peer median — (1)FY2020: ALF 9.4%; peer median — (0)FY2021: ALF 15.3%; peer median — (1)FY2022: ALF 20.3%; peer median 15.5% (4)FY2023: ALF 18.3%; peer median 15.9% (4)FY2024: ALF 15.4%; peer median 18.7% (3)FY2025: ALF 16.9%; peer median 18.0% (4)FY2026: not charted — no EBITDA/EBIT split
EBIT margin
ALF ebit margin by financial year, with peer median0%15%30%FY17FY18FY20FY22FY24FY26FY2017: not charted — not from annual reportFY2018: ALF 13.0%; peer median — (1)FY2019: ALF 10.4%; peer median — (1)FY2020: ALF 5.5%; peer median — (0)FY2021: ALF 11.5%; peer median — (1)FY2022: ALF 17.0%; peer median 9.8% (4)FY2023: ALF 15.0%; peer median 10.0% (4)FY2024: ALF 11.2%; peer median 9.7% (3)FY2025: ALF 12.9%; peer median 13.0% (4)FY2026: not charted — no EBITDA/EBIT split
Net margin
ALF net margin by financial year, with peer median0%15%30%FY17FY18FY20FY22FY24FY26FY2017: not charted — not from annual reportFY2018: ALF 8.2%; peer median — (1)FY2019: ALF 9.4%; peer median — (1)FY2020: ALF 6.1%; peer median — (0)FY2021: ALF 11.9%; peer median — (1)FY2022: ALF 13.2%; peer median 10.1% (4)FY2023: ALF 15.8%; peer median 7.2% (4)FY2024: ALF 18.8%; peer median 3.7% (3)FY2025: ALF 9.4%; peer median 7.3% (4)FY2026: not charted — no EBITDA/EBIT split

ALF   peer median   below the axis: year not charted (reason in the table). All panels share one scale.

ALF margins by year with peer medians
YearEBITDA margin: ALF · peer median (n)EBIT margin: ALF · peer median (n)Net margin: ALF · peer median (n)Note
FY2017—— (1)—— (1)—— (1)Not charted: not from annual report
FY201816.0%— (1)13.0%— (1)8.2%— (1)
FY201913.4%— (1)10.4%— (1)9.4%— (1)
FY20209.4%— (0)5.5%— (0)6.1%— (0)
FY202115.3%— (1)11.5%— (1)11.9%— (1)
FY202220.3%15.5% (4)17.0%9.8% (4)13.2%10.1% (4)
FY202318.3%15.9% (4)15.0%10.0% (4)15.8%7.2% (4)
FY202415.4%18.7% (3)11.2%9.7% (3)18.8%3.7% (3)
FY202516.9%18.0% (4)12.9%13.0% (4)9.4%7.3% (4)
FY2026—— (1)—— (1)—— (1)Not charted: no EBITDA/EBIT split

Peer medians use only peer-years that passed the same checks; a median of fewer than two companies is not shown. Years are grouped by financial-year label, and year-end months differ between companies.

Not yet available: where the cash goes (operating cash flow to capex, dividends and debt) and underlying versus reported earnings. The figures they need are not yet validated.

Years not charted

These years are on file but their figures did not pass the checks, so no chart is drawn for them.

  • FY2026: Neither EBITDA nor EBIT is recorded, so operating profit cannot be placed.
  • FY2017: Figures were not read from a filed annual report (source: not recorded).
  • FY2014: Neither EBITDA nor EBIT is recorded, so operating profit cannot be placed.

All companies with a chart

Data sourced from NZX company annual reports (income statements). Our datasets may not be complete. Automated analysis can produce errors. If you believe any data on this page is incorrect, please contact us at hello@nzxplorer.co.nz.

For informational purposes only. Not investment advice.

Get NZX governance insights in your inbox

Weekly digest of board changes, insider trades, and market signals. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.