How Allied Farmers Limited makes money

Where ALF’s revenue went in FY2023: operating costs, depreciation, interest and tax, and what was left as net profit. Built from the income statement in the filed annual report, and drawn only when the figures reconcile with each other. ALF company profile

How Allied Farmers Limited makes money — FY2023

Revenue $27.1m · EBITDA $5.0m (18.3% of revenue) · Net profit $4.3m (15.8% of revenue) · Financial year ending June (from the issuer record)

Allied Farmers Limited (ALF) FY2023: where revenue of $27.1m wentRevenue → EBITDA: $5.0mRevenue → Operating costs (net of other income): $22.2mEBITDA → EBIT: $4.1mEBITDA → Depreciation & amortisation: $902kEBIT → Net profit: $4.1mIncome tax credit → Net profit: $207kOther items (net gain) → Interest: $276kRevenue: $27.1mRevenue$27.1mEBITDA: $5.0mEBITDA$5.0mOperating costs (net of other income): $22.2m (derived)Operating costs (net ofother income)$22.2m · derivedEBIT: $4.1mEBIT$4.1mDepreciation & amortisation: $902kDepreciation &amortisation$902kIncome tax credit: $207kIncome tax credit$207kOther items (net gain): $276k (balancing item)Other items (net gain)$276k · balancingNet profit: $4.3mNet profit$4.3mInterest: $276kInterest$276k

Band widths are proportional to NZD amounts. Dashed outlines mark derived figures; the hatched node is a balancing item (net profit less every line above it).

Allied Farmers Limited FY2023 figures used in the chart
FY2023AmountStatusNote
Revenue$27.1mReported
Operating costs (net of other income)−$22.2mDerived *Reported operating expenses $14.7m do not reconcile; not used.
EBITDA$5.0mReported
Depreciation & amortisation−$902kReported
EBIT$4.1mReported
Interest (net finance costs)−$276kReported
Income tax credit+$207kReported
Other items (net gain)+$276kBalancing item *Net profit less the lines above; covers fair-value movements, impairments, associates and anything else not itemised.
Net profit$4.3mReported
  • * operating costs: $22.2m = Revenue − EBITDA
Checks run on these figures (6)
  • Passed: Revenue is within the scale of a column stored in thousands.
  • Passed: Revenue in the income statement ($27.1m) vs the summary table ($27.1m): agree within 2%.
  • Passed: EBITDA − D&A = $4.1m vs reported EBIT $4.1m: reconciles.
  • Not met: Reported operating expenses ($14.7m) leave $12.4m, not EBITDA of $5m (gap $7.4m); costs derived as revenue minus operating profit instead. No split is shown.
  • Passed: Balancing item $0.3m is 1.0% of revenue (limit 25%).
  • Not met: Operating segments sum to $30.6m, 12.9% away from revenue of $27.1m (limit 2%); shown as one Revenue figure.

Figures extracted automatically from the annual report; check against the report. NZD thousands as stored, shown in millions. Source: annual_report_pdf · method: claude_haiku_pdf · extracted 7 March 2026.

Annual report: FY23 Annual Report (PDF, NZX)

EBITDA bridge, FY2022 → FY2023

What moved EBITDA between the two years: the change in revenue, less the change in operating costs (revenue less EBITDA, net of other income; not a reported line). The costs are one net figure; no split by type is held, so none is shown.

ALF EBITDA bridge FY2022 to FY2023FY2022 EBITDA: $5.4m$5.4mFY2022 EBITDARevenue change: +$0.3m+$0.3mRevenue changeCost change (derived): −$0.8m−$0.8mCost change (derived)FY2023 EBITDA: $5.0m$5.0mFY2023 EBITDA
ALF EBITDA bridge FY2022 to FY2023: figures
StepFY2022FY2023Effect on EBITDAStatus
FY2022 EBITDA$5.4m$5.4mAs charted
Revenue$26.8m$27.1m+$0.3mReported
Operating costs (net, derived)$21.4m$22.2m−$0.8mDerived: revenue − EBITDA
FY2023 EBITDA$5.0m$5.0mAs charted

$5.4m +$0.3m −$0.8m = $5.0m, which equals FY2023 EBITDA of $5.0m. EBITDA is the figure stored from each statement; companies that headline an adjusted measure (EBITDAF, underlying EBITDA) can report a different number.

What changed from FY2022 to FY2023

MeasureFY2022FY2023ChangeChange %
Revenue$26.8m$27.1m+$321k+1.2%
EBITDA$5.4m$5.0m−$474k−8.7%
Net profit$3.5m$4.3m+$746k+21.1%
EBITDA margin20.3%18.3%−2.0 pts—
Net margin13.2%15.8%+2.6 pts—

Both years passed the same checks. Margins are shares of revenue; their change is in percentage points. n/m = not meaningful (prior-year figure at or below zero). Each year holds the figures from its own annual report; restated comparatives are not applied.

Margins over time

EBITDA, EBIT and net profit as a share of revenue for each year whose figures passed the checks (8 of 10 years from FY2017). The shaded line is the median of 5 other listed Financials operating companies, using each one’s same financial year where it passed the checks; the number of companies in each median is in the table. Gaps are years that were not charted.

EBITDA margin
ALF ebitda margin by financial year, with peer median0%15%30%FY17FY18FY20FY22FY24FY26FY2017: not charted — not from annual reportFY2018: ALF 16.0%; peer median — (1)FY2019: ALF 13.4%; peer median — (1)FY2020: ALF 9.4%; peer median — (0)FY2021: ALF 15.3%; peer median — (1)FY2022: ALF 20.3%; peer median 15.5% (4)FY2023: ALF 18.3%; peer median 15.9% (4)FY2024: ALF 15.4%; peer median 18.7% (3)FY2025: ALF 16.9%; peer median 18.0% (4)FY2026: not charted — no EBITDA/EBIT split
EBIT margin
ALF ebit margin by financial year, with peer median0%15%30%FY17FY18FY20FY22FY24FY26FY2017: not charted — not from annual reportFY2018: ALF 13.0%; peer median — (1)FY2019: ALF 10.4%; peer median — (1)FY2020: ALF 5.5%; peer median — (0)FY2021: ALF 11.5%; peer median — (1)FY2022: ALF 17.0%; peer median 9.8% (4)FY2023: ALF 15.0%; peer median 10.0% (4)FY2024: ALF 11.2%; peer median 9.7% (3)FY2025: ALF 12.9%; peer median 13.0% (4)FY2026: not charted — no EBITDA/EBIT split
Net margin
ALF net margin by financial year, with peer median0%15%30%FY17FY18FY20FY22FY24FY26FY2017: not charted — not from annual reportFY2018: ALF 8.2%; peer median — (1)FY2019: ALF 9.4%; peer median — (1)FY2020: ALF 6.1%; peer median — (0)FY2021: ALF 11.9%; peer median — (1)FY2022: ALF 13.2%; peer median 10.1% (4)FY2023: ALF 15.8%; peer median 7.2% (4)FY2024: ALF 18.8%; peer median 3.7% (3)FY2025: ALF 9.4%; peer median 7.3% (4)FY2026: not charted — no EBITDA/EBIT split

ALF   peer median   below the axis: year not charted (reason in the table). All panels share one scale.

ALF margins by year with peer medians
YearEBITDA margin: ALF · peer median (n)EBIT margin: ALF · peer median (n)Net margin: ALF · peer median (n)Note
FY2017—— (1)—— (1)—— (1)Not charted: not from annual report
FY201816.0%— (1)13.0%— (1)8.2%— (1)
FY201913.4%— (1)10.4%— (1)9.4%— (1)
FY20209.4%— (0)5.5%— (0)6.1%— (0)
FY202115.3%— (1)11.5%— (1)11.9%— (1)
FY202220.3%15.5% (4)17.0%9.8% (4)13.2%10.1% (4)
FY202318.3%15.9% (4)15.0%10.0% (4)15.8%7.2% (4)
FY202415.4%18.7% (3)11.2%9.7% (3)18.8%3.7% (3)
FY202516.9%18.0% (4)12.9%13.0% (4)9.4%7.3% (4)
FY2026—— (1)—— (1)—— (1)Not charted: no EBITDA/EBIT split

Peer medians use only peer-years that passed the same checks; a median of fewer than two companies is not shown. Years are grouped by financial-year label, and year-end months differ between companies.

Not yet available: where the cash goes (operating cash flow to capex, dividends and debt) and underlying versus reported earnings. The figures they need are not yet validated.

Years not charted

These years are on file but their figures did not pass the checks, so no chart is drawn for them.

  • FY2026: Neither EBITDA nor EBIT is recorded, so operating profit cannot be placed.
  • FY2017: Figures were not read from a filed annual report (source: not recorded).
  • FY2014: Neither EBITDA nor EBIT is recorded, so operating profit cannot be placed.

All companies with a chart

Data sourced from NZX company annual reports (income statements). Our datasets may not be complete. Automated analysis can produce errors. If you believe any data on this page is incorrect, please contact us at hello@nzxplorer.co.nz.

For informational purposes only. Not investment advice.

Get NZX governance insights in your inbox

Weekly digest of board changes, insider trades, and market signals. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.