NZX Governance Explorer

How Scott Technology Limited makes money

Where SCT’s revenue went in FY2025: operating costs, depreciation, interest and tax, and what was left as net profit. Built from the income statement in the filed annual report, and drawn only when the figures reconcile with each other. SCT company profile

How Scott Technology Limited makes money — FY2025

Revenue $275.3m · EBITDA $31.5m (11.5% of revenue) · Net profit $14.2m (5.2% of revenue) · Financial year ending August (from the issuer record)

Scott Technology Limited (SCT) FY2025: where revenue of $275.3m wentRevenue → EBITDA: $31.5mRevenue → Operating costs (net of other income): $243.7mEBITDA → EBIT: $20.8mEBITDA → Depreciation & amortisation: $10.7mEBIT → Net profit: $14.2mEBIT → Interest: $3.8mEBIT → Income tax: $2.8mOther items (net gain) → Income tax: $365kRevenue: $275.3mRevenue$275.3mEBITDA: $31.5mEBITDA$31.5mOperating costs (net of other income): $243.7m (derived)Operating costs (net ofother income)$243.7m · derivedEBIT: $20.8mEBIT$20.8mDepreciation & amortisation: $10.7mDepreciation &amortisation$10.7mOther items (net gain): $365k (balancing item)Other items (net gain)$365k · balancingNet profit: $14.2mNet profit$14.2mInterest: $3.8mInterest$3.8mIncome tax: $3.2mIncome tax$3.2m

Band widths are proportional to NZD amounts. Dashed outlines mark derived figures; the hatched node is a balancing item (net profit less every line above it).

Scott Technology Limited FY2025 figures used in the chart
FY2025AmountStatusNote
Revenue$275.3mReported
Operating costs (net of other income)−$243.7mDerived *Reported operating expenses $86.4m do not reconcile; not used.
EBITDA$31.5mReported
Depreciation & amortisation−$10.7mReported
EBIT$20.8mReported
Interest (net finance costs)−$3.8mReported
Income tax−$3.2mReported
Other items (net gain)+$365kBalancing item *Net profit less the lines above; covers fair-value movements, impairments, associates and anything else not itemised.
Net profit$14.2mReported
  • * operating costs: $243.7m = Revenue − EBITDA
Checks run on these figures (6)
  • Passed: Revenue is within the scale of a column stored in thousands.
  • Passed: Revenue in the income statement ($275.3m) vs the summary table ($275.3m): agree within 2%.
  • Passed: EBITDA − D&A = $20.8m vs reported EBIT $20.8m: reconciles.
  • Not met: Reported operating expenses ($86.4m) leave $188.9m, not EBITDA of $31.5m (gap $157.4m); costs derived as revenue minus operating profit instead. No split is shown.
  • Passed: Balancing item $0.4m is 0.1% of revenue (limit 25%).
  • Not met: No operating segments recorded for this year.

Figures extracted automatically from the annual report; check against the report. NZD thousands as stored, shown in millions. Source: annual_report_pdf · method: claude_haiku_pdf · extracted 7 March 2026.

Annual report: Scott Technology Limited Annual Report (PDF, NZX)

EBITDA bridge, FY2024 → FY2025

What moved EBITDA between the two years: the change in revenue, less the change in operating costs (revenue less EBITDA, net of other income; not a reported line). The costs are one net figure; no split by type is held, so none is shown.

SCT EBITDA bridge FY2024 to FY2025FY2024 EBITDA: $26.4m$26.4mFY2024 EBITDARevenue change: −$0.9m−$0.9mRevenue changeCost change (derived): +$6.0m+$6.0mCost change (derived)FY2025 EBITDA: $31.5m$31.5mFY2025 EBITDA
SCT EBITDA bridge FY2024 to FY2025: figures
StepFY2024FY2025Effect on EBITDAStatus
FY2024 EBITDA$26.4m$26.4mAs charted
Revenue$276.1m$275.3m−$0.9mReported
Operating costs (net, derived)$249.7m$243.7m+$6.0mDerived: revenue − EBITDA
FY2025 EBITDA$31.5m$31.5mAs charted

$26.4m −$0.9m +$6.0m = $31.5m, which equals FY2025 EBITDA of $31.5m. EBITDA is the figure stored from each statement; companies that headline an adjusted measure (EBITDAF, underlying EBITDA) can report a different number.

What changed from FY2024 to FY2025

MeasureFY2024FY2025ChangeChange %
Revenue$276.1m$275.3m−$852k−0.3%
EBITDA$26.4m$31.5m+$5.1m+19.3%
Net profit$7.7m$14.2m+$6.5m+84.2%
EBITDA margin9.6%11.5%+1.9 pts—
Net margin2.8%5.2%+2.4 pts—

Both years passed the same checks. Margins are shares of revenue; their change is in percentage points. n/m = not meaningful (prior-year figure at or below zero). Each year holds the figures from its own annual report; restated comparatives are not applied.

Margins over time

EBITDA, EBIT and net profit as a share of revenue for each year whose figures passed the checks (8 of 9 years from FY2017). The shaded line is the median of 22 other listed Industrials operating companies, using each one’s same financial year where it passed the checks; the number of companies in each median is in the table. Gaps are years that were not charted.

EBITDA margin
SCT ebitda margin by financial year, with peer median0%10%20%FY17FY18FY20FY22FY24FY25FY2017: SCT 12.4%; peer median 13.9% (5)FY2018: SCT 10.9%; peer median 11.5% (7)FY2019: SCT 8.9%; peer median 8.7% (7)FY2020: not charted — no EBITDA/EBIT splitFY2021: SCT 10.2%; peer median 13.2% (8)FY2022: SCT 10.8%; peer median 14.4% (7)FY2023: SCT 11.1%; peer median 16.3% (11)FY2024: SCT 9.6%; peer median 15.1% (9)FY2025: SCT 11.5%; peer median 16.8% (12)
EBIT margin
SCT ebit margin by financial year, with peer median0%10%20%FY17FY18FY20FY22FY24FY25FY2017: SCT 10.1%; peer median 7.8% (5)FY2018: SCT 2.7%; peer median 8.0% (7)FY2019: SCT 4.9%; peer median 6.4% (9)FY2020: not charted — no EBITDA/EBIT splitFY2021: SCT 6.1%; peer median 5.9% (10)FY2022: SCT 7.2%; peer median 9.6% (9)FY2023: SCT 7.8%; peer median 7.5% (12)FY2024: SCT 5.5%; peer median 7.1% (10)FY2025: SCT 7.6%; peer median 7.7% (12)
Net margin
SCT net margin by financial year, with peer median0%10%20%FY17FY18FY20FY22FY24FY25FY2017: SCT 7.7%; peer median 4.4% (5)FY2018: SCT 8.3%; peer median 4.6% (7)FY2019: SCT 3.8%; peer median 4.7% (9)FY2020: not charted — no EBITDA/EBIT splitFY2021: SCT 4.4%; peer median 5.1% (10)FY2022: SCT 0.0%; peer median 6.8% (9)FY2023: SCT 5.8%; peer median 6.1% (12)FY2024: SCT 2.8%; peer median 2.9% (10)FY2025: SCT 5.2%; peer median 4.8% (12)

SCT   peer median   below the axis: year not charted (reason in the table). All panels share one scale.

SCT margins by year with peer medians
YearEBITDA margin: SCT · peer median (n)EBIT margin: SCT · peer median (n)Net margin: SCT · peer median (n)Note
FY201712.4%13.9% (5)10.1%7.8% (5)7.7%4.4% (5)
FY201810.9%11.5% (7)2.7%8.0% (7)8.3%4.6% (7)
FY20198.9%8.7% (7)4.9%6.4% (9)3.8%4.7% (9)
FY2020—14.0% (7)—6.7% (8)—6.3% (8)Not charted: no EBITDA/EBIT split
FY202110.2%13.2% (8)6.1%5.9% (10)4.4%5.1% (10)
FY202210.8%14.4% (7)7.2%9.6% (9)0.0%6.8% (9)
FY202311.1%16.3% (11)7.8%7.5% (12)5.8%6.1% (12)
FY20249.6%15.1% (9)5.5%7.1% (10)2.8%2.9% (10)
FY202511.5%16.8% (12)7.6%7.7% (12)5.2%4.8% (12)

Peer medians use only peer-years that passed the same checks; a median of fewer than two companies is not shown. Years are grouped by financial-year label, and year-end months differ between companies.

Not yet available: where the cash goes (operating cash flow to capex, dividends and debt) and underlying versus reported earnings. The figures they need are not yet validated.

Years not charted

These years are on file but their figures did not pass the checks, so no chart is drawn for them.

  • FY2020: EBITDA is recorded but neither EBIT nor depreciation is, so the step from operating profit to net profit cannot be placed.
  • FY2016: Figures were not read from a filed annual report (source: not recorded).
  • FY2015: Figures were not read from a filed annual report (source: not recorded).
  • FY2014: Figures were not read from a filed annual report (source: not recorded).

All companies with a chart

Data sourced from NZX company annual reports (income statements). Our datasets may not be complete. Automated analysis can produce errors. If you believe any data on this page is incorrect, please contact us at hello@nzxplorer.co.nz.

For informational purposes only. Not investment advice.

Get NZX governance insights in your inbox

Weekly digest of board changes, insider trades, and market signals. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.