How Scott Technology Limited makes money

Where SCT’s revenue went in FY2017: operating costs, depreciation, interest and tax, and what was left as net profit. Built from the income statement in the filed annual report, and drawn only when the figures reconcile with each other. SCT company profile

How Scott Technology Limited makes money — FY2017

Revenue $132.6m · EBITDA $16.4m (12.4% of revenue) · Net profit $10.3m (7.7% of revenue) · Financial year ending August (from the issuer record)

Scott Technology Limited (SCT) FY2017: where revenue of $132.6m wentRevenue → EBITDA: $16.4mRevenue → Operating costs (net of other income): $116.2mEBITDA → EBIT: $13.4mEBITDA → Depreciation & amortisation: $3.0mEBIT → Net profit: $10.3mEBIT → Interest: $67kEBIT → Income tax: $3.1mOther items (net gain) → Income tax: $1.6mRevenue: $132.6mRevenue$132.6mEBITDA: $16.4mEBITDA$16.4mOperating costs (net of other income): $116.2m (derived)Operating costs (net ofother income)$116.2m · derivedEBIT: $13.4m (derived)EBIT$13.4m · derivedDepreciation & amortisation: $3.0mDepreciation &amortisation$3.0mOther items (net gain): $1.6m (balancing item)Other items (net gain)$1.6m · balancingNet profit: $10.3mNet profit$10.3mInterest: $67kInterest$67kIncome tax: $4.6mIncome tax$4.6m

Band widths are proportional to NZD amounts. Dashed outlines mark derived figures; the hatched node is a balancing item (net profit less every line above it).

Scott Technology Limited FY2017 figures used in the chart
FY2017AmountStatusNote
Revenue$132.6mReported
Operating costs (net of other income)−$116.2mDerived *Reported operating expenses $40.1m do not reconcile; not used.
EBITDA$16.4mReported
Depreciation & amortisation−$3.0mReported
EBIT$13.4mDerived *Reported EBIT $14.9m does not reconcile to EBITDA − D&A.
Interest (net finance costs)−$67kReported
Income tax−$4.6mReported
Other items (net gain)+$1.6mBalancing item *Net profit less the lines above; covers fair-value movements, impairments, associates and anything else not itemised.
Net profit$10.3mReported
  • * ebit: $13.4m = EBITDA − D&A (reported EBIT $14.9m differs; the gap falls into Other items)
  • * operating costs: $116.2m = Revenue − EBITDA
Checks run on these figures (6)
  • Passed: Revenue is within the scale of a column stored in thousands.
  • Passed: Revenue in the income statement ($132.6m) vs the summary table ($132.6m): agree within 2%.
  • Not met: EBITDA − D&A = $13.4m vs reported EBIT $14.9m: does not reconcile.
  • Not met: Reported operating expenses ($40.1m) leave $92.5m, not EBITDA of $16.4m (gap $76.1m); costs derived as revenue minus operating profit instead. No split is shown.
  • Passed: Balancing item $1.6m is 1.2% of revenue (limit 25%).
  • Not met: No operating segments recorded for this year.

Figures extracted automatically from the annual report; check against the report. NZD thousands as stored, shown in millions. Source: annual_report_pdf · method: claude_haiku_pdf · extracted 10 March 2026.

Annual report: Scott Technology 2017 Annual Report (PDF, NZX)

Year-on-year EBITDA bridge (FY2016 → FY2017)

Bridge not available: FY2016 is not charted: Figures were not read from a filed annual report (source: not recorded).

Margins over time

EBITDA, EBIT and net profit as a share of revenue for each year whose figures passed the checks (8 of 9 years from FY2017). The shaded line is the median of 22 other listed Industrials operating companies, using each one’s same financial year where it passed the checks; the number of companies in each median is in the table. Gaps are years that were not charted.

EBITDA margin
SCT ebitda margin by financial year, with peer median0%10%20%FY17FY18FY20FY22FY24FY25FY2017: SCT 12.4%; peer median 13.9% (5)FY2018: SCT 10.9%; peer median 11.5% (7)FY2019: SCT 8.9%; peer median 8.7% (7)FY2020: not charted — no EBITDA/EBIT splitFY2021: SCT 10.2%; peer median 13.2% (8)FY2022: SCT 10.8%; peer median 14.4% (7)FY2023: SCT 11.1%; peer median 16.3% (11)FY2024: SCT 9.6%; peer median 15.1% (9)FY2025: SCT 11.5%; peer median 16.8% (12)
EBIT margin
SCT ebit margin by financial year, with peer median0%10%20%FY17FY18FY20FY22FY24FY25FY2017: SCT 10.1%; peer median 7.8% (5)FY2018: SCT 2.7%; peer median 8.0% (7)FY2019: SCT 4.9%; peer median 6.4% (9)FY2020: not charted — no EBITDA/EBIT splitFY2021: SCT 6.1%; peer median 5.9% (10)FY2022: SCT 7.2%; peer median 9.6% (9)FY2023: SCT 7.8%; peer median 7.5% (12)FY2024: SCT 5.5%; peer median 7.1% (10)FY2025: SCT 7.6%; peer median 7.7% (12)
Net margin
SCT net margin by financial year, with peer median0%10%20%FY17FY18FY20FY22FY24FY25FY2017: SCT 7.7%; peer median 4.4% (5)FY2018: SCT 8.3%; peer median 4.6% (7)FY2019: SCT 3.8%; peer median 4.7% (9)FY2020: not charted — no EBITDA/EBIT splitFY2021: SCT 4.4%; peer median 5.1% (10)FY2022: SCT 0.0%; peer median 6.8% (9)FY2023: SCT 5.8%; peer median 6.1% (12)FY2024: SCT 2.8%; peer median 2.9% (10)FY2025: SCT 5.2%; peer median 4.8% (12)

SCT   peer median   below the axis: year not charted (reason in the table). All panels share one scale.

SCT margins by year with peer medians
YearEBITDA margin: SCT · peer median (n)EBIT margin: SCT · peer median (n)Net margin: SCT · peer median (n)Note
FY201712.4%13.9% (5)10.1%7.8% (5)7.7%4.4% (5)
FY201810.9%11.5% (7)2.7%8.0% (7)8.3%4.6% (7)
FY20198.9%8.7% (7)4.9%6.4% (9)3.8%4.7% (9)
FY2020—14.0% (7)—6.7% (8)—6.3% (8)Not charted: no EBITDA/EBIT split
FY202110.2%13.2% (8)6.1%5.9% (10)4.4%5.1% (10)
FY202210.8%14.4% (7)7.2%9.6% (9)0.0%6.8% (9)
FY202311.1%16.3% (11)7.8%7.5% (12)5.8%6.1% (12)
FY20249.6%15.1% (9)5.5%7.1% (10)2.8%2.9% (10)
FY202511.5%16.8% (12)7.6%7.7% (12)5.2%4.8% (12)

Peer medians use only peer-years that passed the same checks; a median of fewer than two companies is not shown. Years are grouped by financial-year label, and year-end months differ between companies.

Not yet available: where the cash goes (operating cash flow to capex, dividends and debt) and underlying versus reported earnings. The figures they need are not yet validated.

Years not charted

These years are on file but their figures did not pass the checks, so no chart is drawn for them.

  • FY2020: EBITDA is recorded but neither EBIT nor depreciation is, so the step from operating profit to net profit cannot be placed.
  • FY2016: Figures were not read from a filed annual report (source: not recorded).
  • FY2015: Figures were not read from a filed annual report (source: not recorded).
  • FY2014: Figures were not read from a filed annual report (source: not recorded).

All companies with a chart

Data sourced from NZX company annual reports (income statements). Our datasets may not be complete. Automated analysis can produce errors. If you believe any data on this page is incorrect, please contact us at hello@nzxplorer.co.nz.

For informational purposes only. Not investment advice.

Get NZX governance insights in your inbox

Weekly digest of board changes, insider trades, and market signals. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.